The Habsburg Myth: Austria in the Writing CurriculumAuthor(s): Katherine ArensSource: Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, Vol. 29, No. 2, Austria (Autumn, 1996), pp.174-187Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Association of Teachers of GermanStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3531827Accessed: 23/08/2010 22:27

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Blackwell Publishing and American Association of Teachers of German are collaborating with JSTOR todigitize, preserve and extend access to Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German.

http://www.jstor.org

The Habsburg Myth: Austria in the Writing Curriculum

Katherine Arens University of Texas at Austin

While there is little debate that German de- partments are changing, in part because of de- clining enrollments in basic language studies, less consensus exists about what form those changes should take. Worries about the "integrity" of the German curriculum are growing, a set of concerns about students' declining mastery of the language, and about how the traditional palette of major courses can still be taught in German. In order to counter this insistence on language first, the idea of "German across the curriculum" (GAC) has emerged to direct possible curricular innovations 1 - the idea that language competence must be integrated into more places in the undergraduate curriculum: "While foreign language teaching, by its very 'foreignness,' often occupies the margins of a college curriculum, less commonly taught lan- guages (LCTLs) are likely to be isolated even from the mainstream of the foreign language enter- prise."2 The hope is that, if language studies are integrated with other studies, they will become more relevant, which can spur students to set higher goals of language achievement.

What is often absent from these suggestions, however, is an alternative view of what language departments would have to offer the average col- lege-level curriculum. Even in the extant GAC model, it is primarily language-teaching that in- structors of German import into the more general curriculum, often as ancillary instructors for con- tent courses that instructors of other disciplines offer (for instance, extra credit hours attached to a course in modern European history, where stu- dents read documents in the original, for in- stance).

In what follows, I detail a course entitled "The Habsburg Myth" in order to suggest a new role for the teacher of German or "Austrian studies" in the curriculum. While the content of the course

may itself attract students, I will focus instead on how this course teaches students how to think about cultural and disciplinary discourses - that is, about how language functions in cultural con- texts and according to the needs of particular dis- ciplines, and how "facts" and "meaning" are de- pendent upon these two contexts.

Curricular and Intellectual Redefinitions: A New Need

My point of departure in designing the course on the "Habsburg Myth" was, as noted, current debates in GAC/WAC. My rationale for describ- ing it here is to argue that we need to define GAC/WAC initiatives more broadly than has been done heretofore. Namely, GAC or WAC teachers have more than their expertise in a par- ticular language skill (German or writing) or in a particular content area to offer students: the GAC/WAC teacher is also an expert in the con- ventions for problem-solving and thinking, and in the conventions of writing about issues vari- ous disciplines use. GAC and WAC projects have to this point provided innovative ways for the teacher to implement the first two kinds of exper- tise (content and language skills, written narrowly) into the undergraduate curriculum, and they have concomitantly made great strides in justifying the existence of language departments as area studies departments and cultural studies departments rather than simply as language-teaching depart- ments. However, I believe that the future of lan- guage departments as central to humanistic edu- cation lies in exploiting a third initiative - in teaching how to think and articulate themselves according to the discourse norms of particular dis- ciplines, as each discipline prefers to formulate

174

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

problems, construct arguments, and formulate es- says. In fact, unless "language learning" and "writ- ing" are tied to such broader curricular concerns, the language curriculum cannot continue to claim to be a full partner in the post-secondary institu- tion.

An alternate vision of what it means to imple- ment studies of "German" into the curriculum is therefore necessary. My discussions in the follow- ing sections of this essay will center around a course that I designed to foster the study of Ger- man in another way: by fulfilling one institution's requirements for a course in writing across the curriculum (WAC).3 Many undergraduate curric- ula have such requirements, where students must take a certain number of courses designed to fos- ter critical writing and thinking skills. Often, these critical skills are practiced in the context of indi- vidual disciplines' requirements for writing. As such, WAC represents an initiative to integrate English composition training into various points in the undergraduate curriculum - an initiative equivalent to GAC in many ways. The teacher of "Austrian/German studies" who can offer a course like this will create a new kind of market for language and literary/cultural studies that have been the backbones of German departments to this date. Moreover, by redefining GAC and WAC courses as parallel ways to teach cultural literacy rather than simply skills, both language and writ- ing courses can justify their existence as equal partners in the undergraduate curriculum.

First and foremost, the existence of such courses makes a strong case to students (even those with few or no foreign-language skills) for the need to deal with cultures in the languages of those cultures, because crossing language boundaries means crossing conceptual bounda- ries. Just as any text providing a "history of a foreign country in translation" outlines a different vision of history than that written for a "native" culture, so, too, does any area of enterprise. Stu- dents must learn how to negotiate that conceptual gap, just as much as they do a language gap - to be "literate" in any discipline as it moves across cultures means that a professional must under- stand these conceptual differences in order to reach conclusions with as little ethnocentric bias as possible. Therefore, business people who want to work in Germany need German - not because the vast majority of German business people do not speak English (they do), but because Germans analyze business situations differently, even in a

purportedly value-neutral fiscal analysis. Learning to read how texts reflect that bias (in German or English) is thus critical in establishing a profes- sional's credibility as an "expert," even if their foreign language skills in speaking or writing never become near-native.

Second, such courses make the case for hu- manistic education as practice in types of critical thinking that are not present in the sciences (or, unfortunately, in the social sciences). Textuality and the conventions of reading in a culture affect the meaning of the text, whether that text is a business report or a novel. For example, until very recently, the German managerial class probably had a classical education, while its US equivalent probably learned economics, law, or business, in- stead. This education gap will create differences in the business people's analytical skills - e.g., a tendency on the part of Germans to think meta- phorically, whereas U.S. businesspeople tend to think fiscally or in terms of litigation. When read- ing reports from these two cultural milieus, then, the reader will not understand the significance of messages unless they can weight these commu- nicative strategies. Similarly, to evaluate the credi- bility of the writer, readers must register the sub- text against which "the numbers" are intended to be read. If a German businessman refers to a par- ticular deal as a trip to Canossa (Canossagang), for instance, the irony may well be lost on an outsider who does not realize that Canossa is the mountain pass where the emperor had to submit to the pope's authority after crawling up to the top of the pass on his knees in the snow. And that irony may be an intended part of future negotia- tions - more than a simple point-of-information joke, such a reference may set the tone for the whole further discourse in which the negotiations take place by designating the partners as pope and emperor.

When humanities teachers point out such items in the context of a writing course, it can seem like the teacher is proposing a political agenda or overreading single points of informa- tion on the basis of impossible levels of insider expertise. Yet the irony signaled by the Canossa metaphor will pervade the rest of the text of the negotiations, which the student can recover as part of that cultural setting ("Germans construe negotiations as if they reflected great moments in history"), not as the teacher's bias or as cultural trivia. A course highlighting how discourse and content markers in language work in this way thus

175

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

has the potential of importing the humanities into non-humanistic contexts: our humanities courses develop skills in critical reading and analysis on which other departments rely on, not just "foreign language" and vague "knowledge of foreign cul- tures." In many ways, students can learn this kind of critical reading more easily using comparisons across cultures or historical eras than within their own discipline: it is often easier to acknowledge that "Germans are not Irish" in comparing the roles played by political parties and religion in the two countries than to analyze where class or party biases run through a text on party politics from their own country.

Third, by crossing disciplines and the thought conventions of disciplines in this way, a course like "The Habsburg Myth" opens up possibilities for GAC that will increase the preparedness of our own majors, and of majors in related human- istic disciplines. We will not be delaying content until "students' language abilities are up to snuff," but rather teaching our students the higher-levels of critical language use in general (such as biasing narratives through acts of foregrounding or back- grounding certain material). This will sensitize them to more complex language use, even if that language is, for the present, simply compre- hended rather than actively controlled (compre- hension facilitates later production). We may thus offer our students early visions of why humanistic disciplines can be interesting specializiations. More than just mastery of a language or a litera- ture, they contain a microcosm of a whole spec- trum of life problems, negotiated through lan- guage in historical context.

To move toward fulfilling at least some of these goals, I designed this course as an introduction to an area of Austrian studies that is very attractive to students: nineteenth-century Habsburg history. A "German professor" could add this subject to the curriculum outside the narrow parameters of the German department, for instance as a sup- plemental history-area course for a campus lack- ing more than basic courses resources on Central Europe. However, this course most emphatically does not represent simply a history course, even while using history (and historiography) as a major content focus. Instead, it highlights a distinctive problem in the humanities, one that is central to literary studies but which influences many neigh- boring disciplines: the status of the "text" and how "historical facts" change their faces in a narrative constitutes a problem crucial to much current

thought in historiography, as well. Therefore, I will describe the composition of

the course as defined by disciplinary thinking (not simply by the content), and explain how I taught that content and discourse area to upper-division undergraduate students as a WAC course. After that, I will turn to how one could modify this course for more specific contexts, including GAC initia- tives. My hope is that this exposition will open a new space not only for Austria in the "German" curriculum, but also for teachers of small lan- guages to assume more central roles as part of humanities education in the colleges and univer- sities.

The Habsburg Myth: The Course

In my institution, the "Habsburg Myth: Politics and Family Drama" fulfilled the requirements for a so-called "significant writing component" course.4 It was thus designed for a general public of junior/senior students who were interested in filling their graduation writing requirements - students accustomed to college-level reading, but who had not necessarily had any earlier exposure to Austro-Hungarian culture. Because there is a comparative dearth of European history courses on my campus (which focuses heavily on US and British history, and on post-Soviet studies in East- ern Europe), I hoped to capitalize on current me- dia interest in the Balkans to introduce a new course on Austria, as the heart of Central Europe and the origin of the Bosnian/Croatian conflicts being played out today. This hope also explains the rather melodramatic course description (see Appendix), which I wrote to be eye-catching, and to overcome both the unfamiliarity of the materi- als and the competition with any number of other courses that fulfill the same requirement.

The organization of the course materials is strictly chronological, starting with a brief intro- duction on Metternich's Austrian Empire after 1812, but concentrating on the reign of the Em- peror Franz Joseph (1848-1916), and ending with the breakup of Austria-Hungary after World War I. However, I organized the sequences of readings and student assignments to highlight critical thinking and writing about history as story- telling. The historical "facts" emerged as students compared and contrasted points of view in read- ings; I held my lectures to an absolute minimum (mostly in the first week, and at transitions be-

176

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

tween historical epochs), so that students would argue out the points of view in history texts in class discussions instead. The students therefore always focused on a task of critical reading rather than on any definitive collection of dates or facts.

1. Readings and Critical Reading Skills

Most daily assignments on the course syllabus (see Appendix) contain readings from more than one source so that students confront the issue of perspective in history-writing. To introduce a par- ticular period or moment in Austro-Hungarian history, pairs of readings first focused on the pre- dominant kind of history-writing: on political and economic histories. I instructed students to read for the similarities and differences between two or more accounts of the evolution of an era. In class, students helped assemble those differences and comparisons in parallel columns of facts on the board (parallel time lines, with the teacher as recorder), and to speculate about the points of view underlying these time lines.

For example, A.J.P. Taylor's classic The Habsburg Monarchy, 1809-1918 offers mainly a political account of the empire and its peoples, highlighting differences between German-Aus- trian and Hungarian points of view on the evolu- tion of the Dual Monarchy. Alan Sked's much more recent The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire 1815-1918 incorporates much more economic data, to throw more light on everyday life in the empire. 5 The classic history by A.J.P. Taylor is thus more consistent in includ- ing Hungarian reactions to political events than is Sked's more recent entry. In consequence, Tay- lor generally evaluates events (like the 1867 Com- promise [Ausgleich]) that enhance Hungarian power as increases in democracy within the em- pire, while Sked will treat it as a centripetal devel- opment that threatens the political unity and power of the Empire as a whole. Such perspec- tives emerge clearly in titles, charts, and lists of significant dates, as much as they do in the prose of the narrative and the data mustered for the reader.

Students become familiar with the idea of his- tory as story-telling and with critical reading in a more formal way as well in a lecture at the start of the course, backed up by an optional essay on historiography by the French historian Michel de Certeau.6 The point of this lecture/reading was

that history is actually history-writing, that all his- torical narratives are actually interpretations of the facts presented therein, assembled in that form to serve particular ends, to privilege certain points of view. Working through the similar but conflict- ing narratives in a pair of histories like Sked and Taylor allows students to realize the practical con- sequences of point of view for writing.

To bring this point home in a different way, I added another set of "historical" texts to the mix. After the students were familiar with the general outlines of historical development over a decade or two, they were directed to read about major figures in those developments: to readings from biographies of the actors in the Habsburg "family drama." Biographies present additional problems in critical reading, because they often connect documentation with historical context in ways that overarching national histories do not.

The typical biography of Franz Joseph will, for instance, contain excerpts from his letters to his family and to his ministers, as well as the texts of legislation he sponsored. Historians do use such material in their narratives about nations, but in different ways. In these texts, an historian will use a letter from Franz Joseph to Elisabeth to substan- tiate her interest in the Hungarian cause (or to prove that his reasons for marrying her were un- suitable). Yet such a use of a letter does not exhaust its contents as discourse. A letter also reveals much about the social status of its writer, social expectations and protocol, norms of behavior or values, and personal motivation. One can easily address a central issue of historiography by help- ing students recognize how historical "facts" have a different status in a letter than in government statistics. Each has its own style, its own credibility, its own claims to validity. In this case, students must reconcile, for example, Franz Joseph's let- ters with his image as a leader that the official histories present. Again by comparing how the facts are presented and shaded, students become sensitive to the communicative strategies inherent in genres, much as in literary texts.

The whole syllabus functions to undercut the seemingly "natural" presentation of facts in any one type of historical narrative. Through these juxtapositions and through daily comparisons of their reading experiences, students learned how texts work as discourse, identifying what biases, assumptions, priorities, models of nationhood and ethnicity, legal systems, underlie the writing of each account. Some of their conclusions point

177

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

to ways in which authors write for different audi- ences (Taylor wrote when Hungary was behind the Iron Curtain, and so he was arguing for its legitimacy as a historical culture of Europe in a way different than Sked did). Other conclusions point to the fact that familiar genres may have had different communicative functions in the nine- teenth century than in the twentieth: "personal" letters then were as worth intercepting as media events and cellular phone calls are today, and so our assumption that they are "private" commu- nication may well not be the case in an Austria- Hungary with an active secret police (as is evident in the Mayerling situation). The simple task of answering whom each account addressed, and why it included or excluded certain information (as a "natural" consequence of the audience), fa- miliarizes students both with historicized forms of discourse, as well as with the facts about Austria- Hungary. After a very few attempts, students be- come very adept at spotting the discrepancies of each text, and of understanding how each text has chosen to tell its story.

As an additional move in this direction, the course included other materials not normally treated as part of official history, but in frequent use by students of popular culture: tell-all or "as told to" memoirs, historically-adequate "docu- dramas" (like Morton's A Nervous Splendour, which approaches 1888/89 as a kind of historical travelogue), fiction (novels like Joseph Roth's Radetzky March, which re-approaches history with fictional characters), and films (as alternative biographies, like Mayerling or Szabo's Oberst Redl7). Beyond the comparative critical reading assignments described above, students have a fur- ther assignment when they read these texts: to ascertain what whole regions of facts are included or excluded from a narrative like Morton's, by comparing it to formal historical accounts like Sked's or Taylor's.

Each of these texts was well-received as ex- pressing a certain kind of "historical truth," but what kind of truth this is can remain somewhat unclear unless readers become sensitive to the role of argumentation in writing, just as they have with issues of literary discourse or genre. Each plausible historical narrative relies on a different kind of argumentation strategy than does the overarching national narrative, which is usually causal in its argument. Finding out what regions of data support which points of view is also an exercise in critical thinking. In addressing these

issues, students practice the kind of problem-solv- ing that professional historians need to do every- day, when they enter archives or look to govern- ment documents.

For instance, Habsburg biographies are par- ticularly interesting in terms of historical evidence- gathering because much official (but personal) ma- terial is still in family hands, or has been released in segments, under circumstances heavily in- volved with political issues that do not appear in the text at all. Can we know "the truth" about Mayerling before the deathbed letters purportedly in the hand of the family are released, or not? Is the "historical truth" reported about Crown Prince Rudolf's death in Judtman an account of the facts, or of a carefully wrought cover-up (a question that often arises when one considers how certain classes of information have been ex- punged from the record - including the exact layout of the hunting lodge, which could be used to invalidate the credibility of certain ear-wit- nesses). On another level, a tell-all memoir by an anonymous "R" who purports to be a Habsburg, He Did Not Die at Mayerling, offers another problem of documentation. It is probably total fic- tion (an account written by someone "hidden in the death chamber"), but it reflected a prevalent suspicion about a government cover-up. Add the fact that it was a tell-all book written in the 1930s for a US audience, and other kinds of facts about the Habsburgs emerge: it was written for profit, but it could also have been written to stir up re- sistance against Hitler by suggesting the possibility of a Habsburg restoration (the family is officially silent on that possibility, but since it was deposed, it has remained active in European politics, mak- ing such a restoration plausible up to this day).

In approaching more marginal historical facts like those in this book, students must apply their knowledge of contemporary popular culture to be critical of formal history-writing as it typically pre- sents incomplete arguments. Trading in "insider information" and reporting tell-all memoirs seems to be characteristic of almost any political figure in the media age - and Austria-Hungary was thickly populated with newspapers and with jour- nalists trying to scoop each other as the West is today with telejournalists and paparazzi. When these issues are put on the table when students read such texts, they explore new ways of calling official histories into question. For example, most histories of all sorts concur that Emperor Franz Joseph went out of his way to portray himself as

178

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

"first bureaucrat of the state" instead of autocratic monarch (with the latter being a better description of any monarch who decides to be his own prime minister, as Franz Joseph was). Yet what if the monarch was consciously trading in this image- if he were using it to manipulate the media in ways that his contemporaries recognized as fiction in- stead of fact?

This type of question may originate in popular history or culture, but it potentially creates prob- lems in official historiography as well. For exam- ple, Franz Joseph's emphasis on his role as bu- reaucrat has made many remember him as such, and attribute a purely reactive quality to all his political decisions - a bureaucrat, after all, doesn't make policy so much as react to situations. Is that true, or merely media spin imposed on generally unpopular political decisions by a ruler who went out of his way to underscore his be- nevolence? Fiction, tell-all memoirs, and docu- dramas may thus have limited "true history" claims, while making great claims of authenticity about how they represent the experiences of the age.8

To foster critical thinking, then, it becomes important for students to work through the credi- bility status of texts and arguments from the stand- point of evidence, just as it was for them to work through issues of discourse. The syllabus for "The Habsburg Myth" was thus constructed to foster two different kinds of critical analysis: the dis- courses of history (how history is told) and histori- cal analyses (how historical data is used in argu- mentation). These assignments in critical reading, however, also needed to be integrated into the course by parallel writing assignments, and in the evaluation strategies applied to student work: comprehension leads to production, and student success must be evaluated in appropriate terms.

2. Writing about Reading: WAC and GAC

As noted above, this course was designed to fulfill a university's requirements for a "significant writing component, which presented an automat- ic framework for assignments and evaluation that I adapted to the course goals. To do so, I required two extended (5-7 pp.) book reviews (the first with a rewrite) as counting for 70% of the course grade (again, see the course description in the Appen- dix).

The two book reviews were constructed as

two different variants of a straightforward task in expository prose writing, and as representative of a genre historians use - as part of the profes- sional discourse of history. On the formal end, then, each had to conform to these professional standards, with formal notes and bibliography (University of Chicago style, or any other useful one for students in related disciplines).

The first paper was a simple book review (stu- dents were sent to a selection of magazines to see how they are constructed), assessing one of the texts read as it would appeal to a particular audi- ence. Students had a compulsory rewrite to im- prove their prose, and their final grade on this assignment was an average of the two attempts. The assignment was evaluated not only on stand- ard technical criteria, but also on the student's ability to uncover and convey the importance of the specific book's point of view. A retelling of the contents ("it did x, y, and z"), however com- petent, would never receive higher than a "B" grade, since such a retelling would not live up to the critical standards I have been suggesting for reading assignments. The retelling would need to explain perspective and bias by referring to how the text presents its issues (its discourse) and to problems or idiosyncrasies in data and argument (its argumentation strategies). Concomitantly, a critical personal reaction to the book reviewed ("I find it inadequate because... ") would also achieve at best a "B" grade because the norm against which the writer's judgment was made was not clarified and woven into evaluation criteria ("An economic historian would like it because ..., but a sociologist would object because ...").

The second paper offered students practice in a more difficult variant of this task because it required students to compare two texts, one from history and one not, in order to show how one supports or contradicts the other's argument. This task requires the student to assess the validity or credibility of historical evidence, to construct a case with historical evidence, and to suggest gaps in the picture of the situation that could bear fur- ther research. In this sense, the goal of the assign- ment was a "state of the field" analysis which points to further work to uncover or do.

The final 30% of the grade was for a final examination representing another kind of writing that checked students' mastery of the two analyti- cal strategies they had practiced during the semes- ter (see the Appendix for the exact examination; it could easily be adapted to a three-hour, in-class

179

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

final). The first question, evaluating Franz Joseph as a monarch, required the student to replicate the kind of argumentation that a historian would practice in writing a formal history. While it tested student mastery of central facts in Habsburg his- tory, it also required a specific type of expository writing. Note that the successful completion of the assignment would depend as much on argu- mentation as on the mastery of historical facts -

all facts had to be inserted into a coherent context, before they were given full credit as meaningful. The second question responded directly to the

gap between genres in history-writing, especially to the differences in biography and histories. By asking students to critique the differing images of two historical figures (one female, and one male), this question tested their ability to negotiate the various kinds of historical knowledge, and to use data from popular culture to question official his- tory (and the reverse). Finally, the third question inverted the first in many ways: it required students to tell a non-official history of Austro-Hungary from the point of view of a Hungarian - a task which required a student to change the list of "most important moments" in Franz Joseph's reign in very distinctive ways, stressing the differ- ent points of view held by various cultures, and probably with an eye toward everyday life as op- posed to high or elite culture.

All three of these questions thus tested stu- dents in critical writing and critical thinking in ways that echoed the daily reading assignments. More- over, by setting questions with explicit discourse requirements (speak as a Hungarian, as a female, as an historian) rather than the more conventional "discuss the reign of Franz Joseph," evaluation of the students' answers rested both on students' ability to hold a critical point of view (a discourse criterion) and on their knowledge of the historical facts and their significance as historical debates (an argumentation criterion). It was definitely an

essay test appropriate to a writing class, but also went beyond what would ordinarily be included in a beginning or intermediate history class, by di-

recting students towards the kind of analytic writ-

ing skills they need in their upper-division history classes.

If my institutional situation had been different, the "Habsburg Myth" could easily be a GAC course instead of a WAC one, opening other op- tions for assignments that would help students negotiate the gaps between cultures in more ways than I have already suggested. Each deserves a

brief special note as a kind of analytic assignment.

For example:

A review or an essay assignment could ask the student to contrast how a German, an Austrian, and an Anglo-American historical narrative treat the same issue. This task could highlight how either discourse norms or analytic habits between cultures vary. It would in any case reveal national biases.

Students could also compare other types of primary texts in a foreign language to official ac- counts of a situation, stressing how specific dis- courses are weighted in the original context, as opposed to how we or a particular historian evalu- ate them. For example, the Empress Elisabeth wrote poetry, which some scholars consider evi- dence of her madness. Yet (except for minor be- ginnings by the biographer Brigitte Hamann) no one has examined that poetry as it relates to the tradition of Heine and the Young Germans, from where she drew her inspiration. Those intellectual links may, in turn, be a key to how the English- inspired Wittelsbach family differed from the Habsburgs, despite their intermarriage.

A student could compare the translation of a history book with its original (as in the case of Robert Kann's seminal book), to uncover what changes have been made to accommodate na- tional spins or audience identification.

Students with even limited competence in the foreign language could work through the dialogue and subtitles of a film, or the sets, sociology, cloth- ing, and rooms portrayed in them - as exercises in how the "authentic" semiotics of two cultures differ.

Students could view the French and US filmic takes on Mayerling to show what they say about the various audiences' sense of historical appro- priateness (not just as different versions of the plots).

Such assignments again would stress the stu- dents' ability to negotiate differences that exist between cultures. They are exercises in various cultural literacies (of discourse, of analytical strate- gies, or even of disciplinary standards as they vary across language borders), each of which under- scores the practical implications of meanings as they are anchored in specific cultural contexts. By basing such exercises on a bilingual or bicultural set of materials, however, the teacher adds an

180

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

additional element of cultural literacy to the as- signments (one that again can help convince the students that learning the foreign language may be useful for other pursuits). In these exercises, student-readers are confronted in graphic ways with various cognitive and organizational ap- proaches that different cultures use to frame their own histories. In this way, courses with "language components" become exercises in critical think- ing that supplement the learning in other disci- plines in central ways.

Conclusion

What I have hoped to highlight about this course is that it is interdisciplinary in traditional terms, in that it includes texts from history, film, literature, and popular culture, i.e. its content is interdisciplinary. However, it is also interdiscipli- nary in a more crucial way: it is an interdisciplinary approach to cultural literacy.

If "The Habsburg Myth" had been a course in literature or general cultural history, the historical documentation would most likely have provided as a framework in which to discuss the cultural production of the Habsburg Empire. The course would have highlighted themes that characterize the culture in that epoch. For an intellectual his- tory approach, the students would have learned how to recover these themes out of that frame- work in political and cultural history and to char- acterize how various groups were affected by events in history. (Note that this approach is very much the tack taken in Morton's work, which tells the story of "everything" that happened in and around Vienna in 1888/89.) In such a framing, for instance, Roth's Radetzky March would ap- pear as a document of how a multi-ethnic nation causes confusions of identities for individuals within it.

In contrast, if these materials represented part of a more traditional history course, the political and economic narratives would be primary (espe- cially as represented in the prevailing canons of Austro-Hungarian history). The other materials would be used to clarify how economic, political, and social situations interacted and were mutu- ally-determining. In this case, the Radetzky March would be a source for explanations of the military hierarchy, and for the economics of the far end of the empire.

As the kind of course, however, that exports

analytic strategies as well as content areas into the general curricula, as I have described it here, "The Habsburg Myth" uses literary/textual con- cerns in historical context (a part of the literary curriculum at least since the initial publication of Hayden White's Metahistory), in order to have students practice at least two particular kinds of critical thinking, a set of concerns about textuality that may have originated in literary studies, but which have also animated the vanguard of histo- riographic thinking. The course teaches students the implications of narratives ([hi]story-telling), texts, and various culturally-based systems of meaning. It shows how cultures represent and ar- ticulate themselves, perpetuate their value and power systems by making certain accounts of his- tory seem "natural," despite how constructed they are.

More critically, a course like "The Habsburg Myth" makes a strong case for language-learning as a type of learning central to any humanities curriculum. The "language teacher" or "writing teacher" turns into a resource person in cultural semiotics and culturally-bound norms for commu- nication; she builds bridges between literacy, cul- tural literacy, and various historical and cultural studies (including the humanities and social sci- ences) instead of pleading on the single and im- precise note that "writing/language is impor- tant." GAC/WAC thus can point the way to a whole new role for the "language arts" in the un- dergraduate curriculum: for teaching and learning critical writing and thinking about texts in cultural contexts.

Notes

lThe classic collection on content-based instruction in the foreign-language curriculum (which includes "lan- guage across the curriculum"), see Merle Krueger and Frank Ryan, eds., Language and Content: Discipline- and Content-Based Approaches to Language Study (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1993). It includes reports from the marquis German across the curriculum programs in the US: Richard Jurasek on the Earlham College Project (85-102); Keith O. Anderson, Wendy Allen, and Le6n NarvAez on St. Olaf's College (103-13); Michael F. Metcalf on the Minnesota Project (114-19); John M. Grandin on the University of Rhode Island's International Engineering Program (130-37); and Benjamin W. Palmer on Eastern Michigan Univer- sity's International Business program (138-47).

2Elizabeth B. Welles, "From the Editor, "ADFL Bul-

181

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

letin 27, 2 (Winter 1996): 1. 3For a classic set of discussions about WAC, see

Anne Herrington and Charles Moran, Writing, Teach- ing, and Learning in the Disciplines, Research and Scholarship in Composition 1 (New York: Modern Lan- guage Association, 1992).

4In the Spring of 1993. This designation at the University of Texas at Austin means that there is a total of 16 pages of writing activities that must be spaced throughout the semester (15 weeks in length) rather than in a single end-semester writing assignment, so that regular feedback be provided. The type of writing activ- ity is not specified, since it is supposed to reflect the type of writing practiced in the individual disciplines. Each student receiving a bachelor's degree must pass two three-hour (-credit) courses as part of graduation re- quirements. The courses that fulfill these requirements are approved by a separate college-wide curriculum committee.

5For complete information on these and other texts used in the course, see the Appendix.

6A more recent set of essays collected by Peter Burke, New Perspectives on Historical Writing, may be an even better substitute. The essays are more di- verse, and could be scattered throughout the semester rather than being clustered. Or if one prefers a detailed, readable, and consistent account, another choice is Robert F. Berkhofer, Jr., Beyond the Great Story: His- tory as Text and Discourse.

7For the complete list of films, see the end of the book list in the Appendix. When the course was origi- nally given, the Deneuve/Sharif Mayerling was not available on tape. It now is, opening the option of com- paring two film versions of the same biography, as an additional exercise in narrative/historical bias.

8The parallel case can be made for the incusion of fiction that I just made for pseudo-history. Roth's novels, for example, present the lived experience of individuals who participated in Habsburg history - people who could have existed, even if they did not. A fiction like Roth's initially seems less challenging of the official nar- ratives than is biography, but both can point to the lacunae in official history, just as a popular culture per- spective can. Roth's novels present at least two genera- tions of the same non-German family making a career as part of the official bureaucracies of the Austro-Hun- garian empire. Their experiences and interactions point to sociological, economic, and political facts of life that were familiar to the inhabitants of the monarchy's non- German peripheries, but which may seem insignificant to later historians who recognize that the German-Aus- trians were the hegemonic class. In this way, the reports of real people ("little people") question official history. Moreover, such views below the level of official scrutiny can also lead readers to different avenues of research. Students will understand the fundamental problem of historiography when they realize that totally other kinds of history could be written off a single set of facts. Al-

ternate approaches to history, such as the history of everyday life or the history of technology, all use "just the facts" while actually (and sometimes covertly) argu- ing various points of view or supporting particular agen- das.

Note, too, that for students who can read Ger- man, Milo Dor's Schusse von Sarajevo offers a Serbian perspective on the era, an interesting vari- ant of Roth's more German-Austrian point of view.

APPENDIX A. Course Description

Department of Germanic Languages The Habsburg Myth: Politics and Family Drama

TTH 9:30-11 Spring, 1993

Course Description:

The Habsburg Dynasty celebrated 700 years of European rule in 1982, with its main creation, the Habsburg Empire, lasting from 1526 to 1918; at times, it also ruled over Spain (from 1558-1700), the Nether- lands, and large portions of Italy. It was a noble family, then, of almost unprecedented political influence and power.

This course will focus on the "last act" of what can rightly be called a political "family drama" - on the Emperor Franz Joseph I, who ruled from 1848-1916. Why this reign remains of interest is its attention to the role of image in politics - its use, one may say, of the "media" to further its political ends (political ends that ranged from nationalistic imperialism in Mexico to sup- pression of terrorism in today's Serbia and Croatia).

Biographies are the key to this family's political management strategies. Each member played out a life in relation to major political events of the early modern era, and the interpretations of these lives were often used as coverups for unpleasant political realities:

Franz Joseph was "the first bureaucrat of his state," but a canny internationalist in politics.

His mother, Sophie, was the power behind the throne, "the only man in the Hofburg."

His wife, Elisabeth (Sisi) of Bavaria, ("the only original thing Franz Joseph ever did") was supposed to be mad: she built a castle on Corfu, spent more time foxhunting in England than with her husband, and was single-handedly responsible for keeping Hungarian separatists within the Habsburg hegemony.

His brother, Maximilian, was more popular in the northern Italian states and with the navy than he was. Maximilian was, therefore, "elected" Emperor of Mex- ico by the European powers, and sent to almost certain death - sent to claim his country, without a promised mili- tary escort. Max was assassinated there by Juarez's men.

182

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

His son, Rudolf, the Crown Prince of Austria, re- portedly committed suicide at Mayerling with his mis- tress, Mary Vetsera - while he was working with Slavic separatists.

His nephew, Franz Ferdinand, was the unex- pected heir to the throne. His marriage was declared morganatic (his children could not inherit the throne) - and he and his wife died at Sarajevo, victims of a plot by the "Black Hand" and the incompetence of the Se- cret Service.

The rest of the cast of characters was just as inter- esting, and politically significant: Col. Redl (who sold out the Eastern Front battle emplacements to the Russians), Kaiser Karl ("the last Habsburg"), and minor nobility and bureaucrats.

By mixing readings in history, biography, and litera- ture this class will seek to demonstrate how public figures can obscure politics - in effect, how the media is used to manipulate the political process.

Books

Michel de Certeau. Heterologies. Minneapolis: U of Min- nesota P, 1986.

Brigitte Hamann. The Reluctant Empress. Trans. Ruth Hein. New York: Knopf, 1986.

William M. Johnston. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History 1848-1938. Berkeley: U of Cali- fornia P, 1972.

Frederic Morton. A Nervous Splendor: Vienna 1888- 1889. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1979.

. Thunder at Twilight: Vienna 1913-1914. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1989.

Joseph Roth. The Radetzky March. Trans. Eva Tucker and Geoffrey Dunlop. Woodstock, NY: Overlook P, 1974.

Alan Sked. The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire 1815-1918. London: Longman, 1989.

A.J.P. Taylor. The Habsburg Monarchy, 1809-1918: A History of the Austrian Empire and Austria-Hun- gary. Chicago: U of Chicago, 1974 [1948].

+ other texts on reserve at main library; excerpts on sale at copy center

Assignments/Grading:

** This course fulfills the University's requirements for courses with a "significant writing component."

1 final (on historical dates and identifications) = 30% of grade

*2 five- to seven-page papers, the first with a rewrite (week 6 and week 14) = 35% each (first paper, average of original and rewrite)

**No late work accepted without prior clearance or medical excuse.

APPENDIX B. Course Syllabus

The Habsburg Myth - Politics and Family Drama Syllabus, Spring 1993 Week 1: January 19, 21 Tues: Introduction to the Course Thur: Historiography: de Certeau, Heterologies,

"History: Science and Fiction," 99-221

SECTION 1: From Napoleon through Metternich: Sophie and Habsburg Hegemony

Week 2: January 26, 28 Tues: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy,

"The Dynasty," 9-21 "The Peoples," 22-32 "Old Absolutism," 33-46 "Pre-March," 47-56 Sked, Decline, "Metternich and his

System," 8-40

Thur: Haslip, Crown of Mexico, Chap. 1, ("The Family"), 1-17; Chap. 2

("Revolution of 1848"), 18-35 Haslip, Lonely Empress, Chap. 2 ("The Only Man in the Hofburg"), 21-30; Chap. 3 ("Supreme Autocrat"), 31-40

SECTION 2: Revolution and Habsburg Restora- tion: Franz Joseph

Week 3: February 2, 4 Tues: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Radical

Outbreak," 57-70 "Liberal Episode," 71-82 Sked, Decline, "1848: The Causes,"

41-88 "Failure of the Revolutions of 1848,"

89-136 Sugar, ed., History, Chap. 12 ("Revolu-

tion and the War of Independence"), 209-34

Chap. 13 ("Age of Neoabsolutism"), 235-51

Thur: Johnston, Austrian Mind, Chap. 2 ("Emperor and his Court"), 30-44

Crankshaw, Fall, Chap. 6 ("I Command"), 78-98; Chap. 7 ("Heavenly Empress"), 99-109

Hamann, Reluctant Empress, Chaps. 1 & 2 ("Engagement" and "Wedding"), 3-65

SECTION 3: Habsburg Retrencdulelt: Maximilian and the Decline of Catholic Empires

Week 4: February 9, 11 Tues: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy,

"New Absolutism," 83-94 "Struggle between Federalism and

183

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

Centralism," 95-108 "Constitutional Absolutism," 109-22 "End of Old Austria," 123-29

Thur: Sked, Decline, "From the Counter- Revolution to the Compromise," 137-86

Johnston, Austrian Mind, Chap. 3 ("An Empire of Bureaucrats"), 45-75

Roth, Radetzky March, Chaps. 1-3, 1-46 (esp. 1)

Week 5: February 16, 18 Tues: Max in Italy

Haslip, Crown of Mexico, Chap. 5 ("Admiral of the Fleet"), 56-74

Chap. 7 ("Princess Charlotte"), 75-85 Chap. 8 ("New Responsibilities"), 86-106 Chap. 9 ("End of Venetia-Lombardy"),

107-21

Thur: Max in Mexico Haslip, Crown of Mexico, Chaps. 11-14,

140-202 Chap. 17 ("Emperor of Mexico"),

242-53

Week 6: February 23, 25 Tues: Max and Juarez

Haslip, Crown of Mexico, Chaps. 28-32, 414-98

**Paper 1 due

SECTION 4: To the Compromise: Elisabeth and Hungary

Thur: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Making of Dualism," 130-40

"Hungary after 1867," 185-95 Sked, Decline, "Dual Monarchy,"

187-238 Sugar, ed., History, Chap. 14 ("Hungary

and the Dual Monarchy"), 252-66

Week 7: March 2, 4 Tues: Jaszi, Dissolution, Part V ("Dynamics of

Centrifugal Forces"), 271-375 Crankshaw, Fall, Chap. 10 ("Autocracy"),

169-86 Hamann, The Reluctant Empress,

Chapter 6 ("Hungary"), 143-82

SECTION 5: Reorientation and Isolation in Europe: Imperial Personal Lives

Thur: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Liberal Failure," 141-55

"Habsburg Recovery," 156-68 Crankshaw, Fall, Chap. 11

("Prussia Takes All"), 187-230

Week 8: March 9, 11 Tues: Hamann, The Reluctant Empress,

Chaps. 7 ("Burdens of Public Appearance") and Chap. 8 ("Queen Rides to Hounds"), 183-246

Chap. 12 ("Katharina Schratt"), 306-20

Thur: Gainham, Habsburg Twilight, "Katharina Schratt," 117-41

Haslip, Emperor and the Actress, "Number Nine Gloriettengasse," 119-29 "Empress Relies on Katharina," 183-94 "End of an Epoch," 262-72

**March 13-21, Spring Break

SECTION 6: Dualism vs. Trialism: Rudolf, Hun- gary, and Slavic Sepairatii

Week 9: March 23, 25 Tues: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Years of

Confusion," 169-84 Johnston, Austrian Mind, Chap. 18

("Marcionists at Prague"), 265-73 Chap. 24 ("Institutions and Intellectuals in

Hungary"), 335-56 **Paper One rewrite due (resubmit original, too)

Thur: Jaszi, Dissolution, Part VI ("The Danger of Irredenta"), 379-429

May, Hapsburg Monarchy, Chap. 10 ("Royal Hungary"), 227-51

Chap. 11 ("Coloman Tisza"), 252-69 Chap. 12 ("Triple Alliance"), 270-304 Chap. 16 ("Magyar Culture"), 362-85 Chap. 20 ("Hungary Militant"), 439-49

Week 10: March 30, April 1 Tues: Hamann, The Reluctant Empress,

Chap. 13 ("Rudolf and Valerie"), 321-49 Gainham, Habsburg Twilight,

"Mayerling," 11-64 Judtmann, Mayerling, Chap. 1, "Sinister

Silence," 13-36

Thur: Morton, Neruous Splendor, passim Mayerling (movie, d. A. Litvak, 1936)

Week 11: April 6, 8 Tues: Mayerling Schlock: The Myth

Barkeley, Mayerling, Chaps. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 73-204

"R," He Did Not Die, Chap. 8, 85-118, & Chap. 21, 358-71

SECTION 7: Rot from within: Redl Thur: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Demo-

cratic Pretense," 196-213

184

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

Gainham, Habsburg Twilight, "Caught in his own Trap - Alfred Redl," 142-60

Asprey, Panther's Feast, 11-14, 180-294 (=Part 2, Chap. 8-Part 3)

Morton, Thunder at Twilight, 63-108

Week 12: April 13, 15 Tues: Colonel Redl (movie, d. Istvan Szabo)

SECTION 8: Danger in the Balkacns: Franz Ferdi- nand and Slavic Sepa-atism

Thur: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Solution by Violence," 214-32

"Violence Rewarded," 233-51 Sked, Decline, "Road to Disaster,"

239-72 Crankshaw, Fall, Chap. 15 ("Germans,

Slavs and Magyars"), 294-320

Week 13: April 20, 22 Tues: Morton, Thunder at Twilight, 1-62,

109-264 (to end, passim, for war outbreak)

Sugar, ed., History, Chap. 15 ("Hungary through World War I"), 267-94

Thur: Brook-Shepherd, Victims at Sarajevo, "Sophie," 39-59

"Scandal," 61-83; "The Monarchy," 125-51 "Climbing Up," 183-210 "Two Paths," 211-37 "Two Pistol Shots," 239-52

SECTION 9: Last Act: Emperor Karl Week 14: April 27, 29 Tues: Taylor, Habsburg Monarchy, "Peoples

without the Dynasty," 252-61 Kraus, "The Last Days of Mankind," In

These Great Times, Prologue & Act I excerpts, 159-86 Act 3 excerpts, 245-58

**Paper 2 due

Thur: Brook-Shepherd, Last Habsburg, "Crippling Legacy," 28-40

"The Throne," 41-47 "Young Emperor," 48-61 "Sch6nbrunn," 191-216 "Madeira," 315-30

Week 15: May 4, 6 Tues: Roth, Radetzky March or Emperor's

Tomb

Thur: Closing Discussion

APPENDIX C. Book and Film List

Books: Ordered (* = optional, available in excerpt as copy)

*Johnston, William M. The Austrian Mind: An Intellec- tual and Social History 1848-1938. Berkeley: U of California P, 1972.

Morton, Frederic. A Nervous Splendor: Vienna 1888/1889. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1979.

. Thunder at Twilight: Vienna 1913/1914. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1989.

*Roth, Joseph. The Radetzky March. Trans. Eva Tur and Geoffrey Dunop. Woodstock, NY: Oerook P, 1974.

Sked, Alan. The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Em- pire 1815-1918. London: Longman, 1989.

Taylor, A.J.P. The Habsburg Monarchy, 1809-1918: A History of the Austrian Empire and Austria-Hun- gary. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1974 [1948].

Options:

Berkhofer, Robert F, Jr. Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard UP, 1995.

Burke, Peter, ed. New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.

Books: Reserve (*= copies of excerpts available singly at copy shop on order)

*Asprey, Robert B. The Panther's Feast. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1959; Carroll & Graff, 1986.

*Barkeley, Richard. The Road to Mayerling: Life and Death of Crown Prince Rudolph of Austria. Lon- don/New York: Macmillan & Co., 1958.

*Brook-Shepherd, Gordon. Archduke of Sarajevo: The Romance and Tragedy of Franz Ferdinand of Aus- tria. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1984.

Victims at Sarajevo: The Romance and Tragedy of Franz Ferdinand and Sophie. London: Havill Press, 1984. (British edition.)

*- . The Last Habsburg [Emperor Charles 1]. New York: Weybright and Talley, 1968.

*Crankshaw, Edward. The Fall of the House of Habsburg. New York: Viking, 1963; Penguin, 1983.

*Certeau, Michel de. Heterologies. Minneapolis: U of Min- nesota P, 1986.

*Gainham, Sarah. The Habsburg Twilight: Tales from Vienna. New York: Athenaeum, 1979.

*Hamann, Brigitte. The Reluctant Empress. Trans. Ruth Hein. New York: Knopf, 1986.

*Haslip, Joan. The Crown of Mexico: Maximilian and His Empress Carlota. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

185

UP 29.2 (Fall 1996)

* . The Emperor and the Actress: The Love Story of Emperor Franz Josef and Katharina Schratt. Lon- don: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1982.

* - . The Lonely Empress: A Biography of Elizabeth

of Austria. Cleveland and New York: World Publishing Co., 1965.

*JAszi, Oscar. The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monar- chy. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1971 [1929].

*Judtmann, Fritz. Mayerling: The Facts behind the Leg- end. Trans. Ewald Osers. London: George G. Harrap &Co., 1971.

*Kraus, Karl. In These Great Times: A Karl Kraus Reader. Ed. Harry Zohn. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990 [1976].

*May, Arthur J. The Hapsburg Monarchy 1867-1914. New York: W.W. Norton, 1951.

*"R.," written in collaboration with Henry Wysham Lanier. He Did Not Die at Meyerling: The Autobiography of "R, " A Habsburg Who Becomes an American. Phila- delphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1937.

Roth, Joseph. The Emperor's Tomb. Trans. John Hoare. Woodstock, NY: Overlook P, 1984.

*Sugar, Peter F, and Peter Hanak, eds. A History of Hun- gary. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1990.

Books: General Background

Corti, Egon Caesar Count. Maximilian and Charlotte of Mexico. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1928.

Dor, Milo. Die Schusse von Sarajewo (= Der letzte Sonntag: Bericht uiber das Attentat uon Sarajewo). Munchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1989 [19821.

Jelavich, Barbara. Modern Austria: Empire and Repub- lic, 1815-1986. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.

Kann, Robert A. A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526-1918. Berkeley: U of California P, 1977.

Magris, Caudio. Danube. Trans. Patrick Creagh. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1989.

Osborne, John. A Patriot for Me. London: Faber & Faber, 1965 [play about Redl].

Palmer, Alan. The Twilight of the Habsburgs: The Life and Times of the Emperor Francis Joseph. New York: Grove P, 1994.

Pauley, Bruce F. The Habsburg Legacy 1867-1939. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger, 1972.

Wheatcroft, Andrew. The Habsburg: Embodying Em- pire. New York: Viking, 1995.

Books: Good Pictures

Johnston, William M. Vienna Vienna: The Golden Age 1815-1914. New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1981.

Spiel, Hilde. Vienna's Golden Autumn 1866-1938. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987.

Films

On the days feature-length movies are shown in class, class will begin at 9:00 instead of 9:30; arrive when you can, if you have an earlier class. If you want to see parts you missed, or would like to see them again to use them for your papers, both films are available for individual viewing at the Batts Hall Language Labora- tory on the second floor; check them out by title and by my class name, "Habsburg Myth."

Mayerling (1936, d. Antole Litvak): in French with English subtitles, 90 min.

* Charles Boyer as Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria, com- mitting suicide over his lack of political influence and his love for a woman (Baroness Mary Vetsera, not his wife, played by Danielle Darrieux). "In the tradition of Wuthering Heights."

Colonel Redl (1987, d. Istvan Szab6): in German with English subtitles, 144 min.

* Klaus Maria Brandauer as Colonel Alfred Redl, "the son of a poor railway worker who, through driving am- bition, became the head of military intelligence and commander of the 8th army in Prague" and who sold out the Austrian/Central European battle plans to the Russians in the years just prior to World War I: "a sweep- ing historical epic of power, intrigue, love and lust."

Mayerling (MGM, 1969, d. Terence Young): with Omar Sharif and Catherine Deneuve, James Mason and Ava Gardner, in English, 127 minutes.

* "The Crown Prince defies his father by leaving his royal lifestyle and joining in student protests during the Hun- garian Revolution. When he falls in love with the young and wealthy Catherine Deneuve, their plans of marriage are thwarted by the king, which leads to tragedy."

* "An international all-star cast, featuring Omar Sharif (Doctor Zhivago), Catherine Deneuve (Belle de Jour), James Mason (Lolita), and Ava Gardner (The Barefoot Contessa) delivers stunning performances as they un- mask the turmoil, decadence and quest for power of one of the last great European dynasties. ... Rudolph must make a choice - to live for love, for country ... or not to live at all. Brilliantly photographed on location in the ornate palaces of Vienna and featuring magnifi- cent period costumes ..."

APPENDIX D. Sample Final Examination

Habsburg Myth Final: Timed Take- Home

1. Write an essay evaluating Franz Joseph's tenure as the Emperor of Austria-Hungary, from 1848-1916. In this essay, be sure you mention both political incidents and personal incidents; the goal of the essay is to decide, on the whole, if he was a benefit or a curse for his country.

186

ARENS: HABSBURG MYTH

Prepare as long as you want, but write for only one hour after you sit down. Handwritten essays are accept- able, if legible; otherwise try writing into a computer or typewriter (typos accepted).

2. Pick one person from Group A below, and one person from Group B. For each of your choices, write an essay explaining this person's public image, and then showing what political problems are covered up when a biographer or historian stresses the image rather than the historical realities of their lives and times.

Again, prepare as long as you want, but write for only 30 minutes on each of your choices (for a total of 1 hour for this question).

GROUP A Archduchess Sophie, mother of Franz Joseph Empress Elisabeth Charlotte/Carlota of Mexico, wife of Maximilian The Mistresses: Katharina Schratt and Mary Vetsera (treat as a pair)

Traveling to Europe?

GROUP B Prince Metternich Crown Prince Rudolf Colonel Alfred Redl Archduke Franz Ferdinand 3. It is 1919. Imagine you are a Hungarian who has

witnessed the whole of Franz Joseph's reign. Tell your son or daughter what the big political moments were in the history of Hungary between 1848 and World War I. Explain why each event was important, and helped Hungary become an independent sovereign nation after 1918. Here you will be telling a story, but get names and dates right!

Think for as long as you want, but write for only 30 minutes.

Have an Exchange Program?

Travel Pro is a Lufthansa authorized GAPP travel agency We work with you on your schedule nights or weekends are no problem

mention this ad and receive $25 per student spending money

We offer non GAPP and individuals excellent prices on group or individual travel to Europe

Travel Pro is an authorized German Rail and Rail Europe ticket office for rail passes and tickets

We offer customized individual and group hotel, hostel, motorcoach and tour services

Travel Pro is a US reservation center for the Goethe Institute language courses in Germany

Contact us for our complete brochure

Travel Pro Daniel Minter DS CTC

PO Box 186 Belmond, IA 50421 800-765-0112 fax 515-444-7170 e-mail one-stop@ten-io.com

187