Teaching Evaluation (BA in Chinese Program)

Evidence of CHINESE Teaching Excellence

TEACHING EVALUATION CHINESE Language Teaching, Editing and Researching

2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 01

Summary of CHINESE Teaching Evaluations

• COURSE TITLE: Chinese Language and Culture • COURSE CODES: CHN-101, CHN-102 & CHIN-103 taught by Intern Teacher -- Hugo

(Fall 2007, Fall 2008 & Spring 2009) • LEVEL of COURSE: Beginning-Intermediate level Mandarin-Chinese • # (Mean) of Students: 30

Quantitative Measures of Student Evaluation

Complete Student Numerical Evaluation Rate the amount of work you do in this language program

More than just what was assigned

97%

Rate the level of your participations in the classroom activities of this language program

Enthusiastically involved 100%

As a student and foreign language learner, how much useful knowledge and skills you gain from this language program

A great deal 100%

General Evaluation of the Language Program Designed and Developed by Hugo

The objective of this language program is clear Strongly agree 100% The program procedures and assignments support course content and language objectives

Strongly agree 100%

The amount of reading and writing you are assigned to do is appropriate

Strongly agree

90%

What overall rating you would give to this language program

Excellent 100%

General Evaluation of the Instructor

Can you give clear answers to any questions asked by this instructor?

Always

95%

Is this instructor considerate to you? Always 100%

Is this instructor effective in teaching this course? Always 100%

Is the instructor enthusiastic about this course? Always 100%

What overall rating you would give to this instructor? Excellent 100%



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 02

PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES

RECOGNITION OF CHINESE TEACING EXCELLENCE BY A SUPERVISING PROFESSOR (in U.S.A.)

Members of the EALC Graduate Committee Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures Goodbody Hall 250, 1011 E. Third Street Bloomington, IN 47405-7005

To Whom It May Concern: It is a real pleasure to write this letter of recommendation for Yu-Hsiu Lee in support of his application for a position as an Associate Instructor in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Indiana University. I have known Yu-Hsiu since 2007 and I am currently his academic advisor. Yu-Hsiu is a third year doctoral student in the Department of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education at the School of Education. In the fall of 2007, Yu-Hsiu worked under my supervision in the EDUC-L650 Internship Program. As part of this Internship, he taught Chinese at the Beginning Level Chinese Program at the Asian Culture Center at Indiana University. In this capacity, Yu- Hsiu performed an outstanding job. He is a passionate, dynamic and engaging instructor, who can easily motivate and encourage students to learn the Chinese language and culture. In addition to this, Yu-Hsiu designed an innovative syllabus and he also incorporated current methodologies and strategies in his teaching practices. He is technologically savvy and because of this talent, he has successfully implemented new technologies in the classroom. He also encourages his students to work in pairs and small groups, so they can fulfill the assignments and tasks in a collaborative and cooperative way. He is very effective in giving feedback to his students and he maintains a good rapport with them. While he was teaching Chinese at the Asian Culture Center under my direction, he took this opportunity to write a Chinese textbook entitled Culturally Responsive Chinese Literacy and Pedagogy, which consists of a Teacher’s Manual and a Student Workbook. This textbook was published by Amazon.com, and it will also be published in China, Taiwan and Thailand.



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 03

In short, Yu-Hsiu is a very intelligent, well-centered, energetic, talented and tenacious young scholar and educator. I really enjoyed working with him. Apart from his teaching experience, he possesses a solid training in Language Education in the School of Education, and Second Language Studies in the School of Arts and Science at Indiana University. He is also pursuing a Ph.D. minor in Biblical Literature in Comparative Literature in the School of Arts and Science. All these magnificent skills and scholastic accomplishments make him an excellent candidate for a position as an Associate Instructor in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Indiana University, so I highly recommend him for this teaching position. If you have any further questions or would like more details or clarification about this letter of recommendation, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,

----------------------------------------------------- Serafín M. Coronel-Molina, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education W.W. Wright Education Building 201 N. Rose Avenue, Room #3044 Bloomington Indiana, IN 47405-1006 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (812) 856-8270



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 04

(PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES, continued) RECOGNITION OF CHINESE TEACING EXCELLENCE

BY A SUPERVISING PROFESSOR (in U.S.A.)

INDIANA UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF EDUCATOIN Department of Literacy, Culture,

and Language Education

James Damico, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Indiana University Department of Literacy, Culture & Language Education 3028 W. W. Wright School of Education 201 North Rose Avenue Bloomington, IN 47405-1006 812-856-8267 U.S.A. [email protected] It is my pleasure to write this letter on behalf of Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu Lee. Hugo was a student in my doctoral seminar and I have served on his research committee here at Indiana University. I have come to know and appreciate Hugo's capabilities and talents. Hugo brings experience, knowledge, and passion to his work as a researcher and an educator.

His experience teaching Chinese is significant. He has taught college level Chinese courses here in the United States and is the founder of the Chinese Circle within the Asian Cultural Center at Indiana University. In this capacity, Hugo has honed key management skills in working with United States undergraduate students, primarily Chinese second-language learners.

Hugo also has an established publication record with an emphasis on creating resources that Chinese language educators can use to guide their students in becoming proficient with Chinese. In particular, his book, Culturally Responsive Chinese Literacy Pedagogy: Teacher's Manual, provides an invaluable resource to help educators develop a stance and enact specific activities with students in which culture is inextricably linked with language. Rather than view language learning solely in terms of traditional Chinese phonetic letters, Hugo also focuses on the knowledge, resources, and skills that learners bring with them into the teaching and learning situation. While Hugo has a strong knowledge of complex or traditional as well as simplified Chinese characters, he connects this knowledge with explicit attention to cultural backgrounds and experiences of learners.

Hugo also possesses a great deal of knowledge and facility with technology. I'm thinking specifically of his Internet-based instruction of Chinese using Skype and his online teaching project in which he worked with students in Thailand (who were majoring in Chinese) in support of hospital workers and other rescue workers with the Tsunami recovery efforts.

Hugo is a capable, highly committed and very passionate educator. He deserves serious consideration for the position of Instructor of Chinese. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 05

Respectfully, James Damico, Ph.D.



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 06

(PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES, continued) RECOGNITION OF CHINESE TEACHING EXCELLENCE

BY A PEER TEACHER (in U.S.A.)

Peer Evaluation for Chinese Language Teaching for Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu Lee

I have known and interacted with Hugo for the past 3 years. I first met him at an English conversation class, and since then we have become friends and both participate in several of the same extracurricular international activities. I have also attended Hugo’s class for beginning Chinese at the Asian Culture Center. Hugo is a talented, intelligent, and resourceful teacher. I have been impressed with his ability to accommodate his teaching to different situations. He has pursued and achieved many educational goals in the time I have known him. Besides his own tutoring, he has written and published an introductory textbook for Chinese, he has generated and managed a tutoring organization in the same language, and he has lead Chinese classes for Americans in the US, immigrants in Taiwan, and various other language speakers on-line. When I attended Hugo’s class, I found him to be a very congenial teacher. I found myself easily learning various Chinese words and expressions through his teaching skills and his materials from his book. I noticed that Hugo’s teaching style was very friendly to American learners, that he was very enthusiastic when teaching, and he had a passion for his students’ learning. His class was a very pleasant experience for me. As a language teacher, I can appreciate Hugo’s teaching style and his goals for his class. Hugo is interested in interacting with his students, and his English skills are excellent. He will be able to fit in very well and contribute a great deal to any program that engages him. I highly recommend him. Sincerely, Vicki Woodward, Master Teacher Intensive English Program Center for English Language Department of Second Language Studies (current) /TESOL and Applied Linguistics (former) Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405 U.S.A. (812) 856-1195 [email protected]



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 07

(PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES, continued)

PEER COMMENTS ON CHINESE TEACHING EXCELLENCE (in U.S.A.) “Hugo is very passionate about teaching Chinese. And he used different strategies to help students effectively learn Chinese as well as remember and apply what they’ve learned. He was well-organized in his teaching, too,” commented by a co-teacher in beginning level Chinese language & cultural studies course in spring 2009/former bilingual program producer in Central China TV (CCTV). “Hugo has the passion for teaching. He is always very enthusiastic and knowledgeable enough to answer various questions. It's a great experience to co-teaching with Hugo. He inspired me a lot by conducting novice Chinese teaching methods such as using building blocks to explain the structure of Chinese characters. It's my honor to write this peer evaluation for him,” commented by a co-teacher in beginning level Chinese language & cultural studies course at Indiana University in fall 2008. “Hugo has deepened knowledge regarding Chinese pedagogy. I really like the way he organized the class. He applied various teaching methods to motivate Chinese learners. It’s a wonderful experience to join his class!” commented by a co-teacher in beginning level Chinese language & cultural studies course in fall 2008/Chinese language tutor of Summer Intensive Chinese Language Flagship Program at Indiana University in summer 2009.

STUDENT COMMENTS ON CHINESE TEACHING EXCELLENCE (in U.S.A.) "Since Chinese is a new language for most people to learn, I like the fact that Hugo teaches each lesson slowly. Hugo doesn't rush and Hugo makes sure that each student has a chance to practice each new word, phrase and sentence. Teaching a difficult language such as Chinese is a challenge, but in my opinion I think Hugo has done a great job in educating students Chinese," commented by a Canadian Chinese L2 student in beginning level Chinese language & cultural studies course at Indiana University in spring 2009. “I like the way/program how Chinese is taught in this class,” commented by a German student in first year Chinese language program at Indiana University in spring 2009. “I greatly appreciate how the teacher practices with students and helps us to improve language” and “Native speaker teacher of Chinese is fluent in English” commented by a movie director and third year Chinese as foreign language learner who plans to film a movie in China. “The games are quite creative and the teaching plan is well organized,” commented by an associate professor of foreign language teaching/coordinator of Confucius Institute in Kentucky during her one-on-one Chinese language tutor orientation in fall 2009. “The orientation gives us a very clear and efficient outline and offers a couple of useful specific techniques,” commented by a 1-on-1 Chinese Language Tutor Association member during her tutor orientation at Indiana University in fall 2009.

“Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu is very compassionate, friendly, and willing to go out a limb for people he wants to help. He is also very open to different cultures as evident in our interaction when I revealed that I am a Malaysian Chinese and my major is Communication and Culture, and Dr. Yu-Hsiu was very keen in learning more about my cultural and education background. Based on the largely clear communication we had in exchanging ideas, I think he is an intelligent man too.”

On February 9, 2011 by Jolin Kwok, A Creative-Writing Auteur, Indiana, U.S.A.



2005-2014

Chi

ne

se L

ect

ure

r in

U.S

.A.

| 08

PEER COMMENTS ON PROOFREADING OF MASTER’S DISSERTATION (in U.K.)

“I've just been informed the results of my Masters degree yesterday, I've been awarded MA with Merit. I got 68 (Merit) for the dissertation that you helped me to proofread the Chinese

translation, I'm really happy. （話説很可惜，還差 2 分我就能拿到 Distinction（70+）了） Thank you very very much for your kindness, you are a big part of my success, Dr. Hugo! Should you need any helps, please do not hesitate to let me know.”

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011, by Jane Petcharat Mphil & PhD in Translation Studies

School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University of London, U.K.

COMMENTS ON RESEARCH IN APPLIED CHINESE LINGUISTICS (in Taiwan)

“Asst Prof. Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu Lee is a young scholar with ambition. I congratulate him on his new position.”

-- Dr. Chin-Chin Tseng (PhD, Linguistics, University of Hawaii, USA) President, Association of Teaching Chinese as a Second Language

FMR Dean, Graduate Institute of Teaching Chinese as a Second Language Professor, Department of Chinese as a Second Language

National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Teaching Evaluation (Undergraduate Courses in Chinese, 2010-2014)

Asst Prof. Dr. Hugo Y-H. Lee, Adjunct Faculty of Foreign Language (Chinese), Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Intergovernmental Organization

9

No. Course Code Course Title Credit Lecture Hrs. Lab Hrs. Course Type Section

1. UG308 Foreign Language I (Chinese)

2 30 0 General A Evaluation Result

Excellent

2. UG313 Foreign Language II (Chinese)


Excellent

Instructor 's list of courses in semester January, 2012



Excellent

Instructor 's list of courses in semester September, 2013



Excellent




Excellent




Excellent

Source



10

ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Course Evaluation: Final January, 2014 Compiled Date: 29-May-2014 :13:52:31

Foreign Language II (Chinese) (UG313 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 37 Forms Received:36 Participation: 97.3% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Course Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 1. The course objectives were explained. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 19.44 % 61.11 % 2. The course outline provided accurate description of the course.

0 % 0 % 25 % 33.33 % 41.67 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 38.89 % 41.67 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 0 % 0 % 25 % 36.11 % 38.89 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

0 % 0 % 25 % 41.67 % 33.33 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 38.89 % 38.89 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 0 % 0 % 25 % 30.56 % 44.44 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 0 % 0 % 25 % 36.11 % 38.89 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

0 % 0 % 25 % 30.56 % 44.44 %

Comments on Course Characteristics:

• course is well prepared by Dr hugo • Very interesting and knowledgeable course

Course Delivery/Teaching Methods/Resource Materials: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

10. The teaching methods were effective. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 41.67 % 38.89 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 0 % 0 % 27.78 % 36.11 % 36.11 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 0 % 0 % 25 % 27.78 % 47.22 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 0 % 0 % 16.67 % 47.22 % 36.11 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 0 % 0 % 16.67 % 47.22 % 36.11 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 33.33 % 47.22 %

Comments on Course Delivery/Teaching Methods/Resour ce Materials:

• Teaching method was very effective • Interesting teaching methods.

Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 33.33 % 47.22 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 0 % 0 % 19.44 % 38.89 % 41.67 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 25 % 25 % 50 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 38.89 % 38.89 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 27.78 % 50 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 33.33 % 44.44 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 0 % 0 % 25 % 38.89 % 36.11 %



11

23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 33.33 % 41.67 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 0 % 0 % 22.22 % 33.33 % 44.44 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 0 % 2.78 % 25 % 30.56 % 41.67 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 0 % 2.78 % 25 % 27.78 % 44.44 %

Comments:

• Great instructor.

Laboratory Sessions: (if applicable) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 27. The laboratory classes were well integrated into the course. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %

28. Help is available. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 29. Allocated time is adequate. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 30. Condition of equipment is acceptable/appropriate. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %

31. Equipment is available. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 32. Laboratory experiment instructions are available. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %

Overall Assessment: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33. I learned a lot from this course. 0 % 0 % 16.67 % 44.44 % 38.89 % 34. You would recommend the course to other students.

0 % 0 % 25 % 33.33 % 41.67 %

35. Overall, I am satisfied with the course. 0 % 0 % 16.67 % 38.89 % 44.44 %

Overall Assessment/Areas for Improvement:

• Great.



12

ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Course Evaluation: Final January, 2013 Compiled Date: 16-Jul-2014 :12:54:11

Foreign Language II (Chinese) (UG313 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 24 Forms Received:24 Participation: 100% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Course Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 1. The course objectives were explained. 4.17 % 0 % 16.67 % 41.67 % 37.5 % 2. The course outline provided accurate description of the course.

4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 29.17 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 45.83 % 25 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 29.17 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

4.17 % 0 % 25 % 45.83 % 25 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 45.83 % 25 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 50 % 25 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 4.17 % 0 % 29.17 % 37.5 % 29.17 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

4.17 % 4.17 % 29.17 % 37.5 % 20.83 %

Comments on Course Characteristics: Course Delivery/Teaching Methods/Resource Materials: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

10. The teaching methods were effective. 4.17 % 0 % 29.17 % 41.67 % 25 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 54.17 % 20.83 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 54.17 % 20.83 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 50 % 25 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 50 % 20.83 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 50 % 25 %

Comments on Course Delivery/Teaching Methods/Resour ce Materials: Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 25 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 4.17 % 0 % 16.67 % 45.83 % 29.17 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 25 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 4.17 % 0 % 16.67 % 54.17 % 20.83 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 4.17 % 0 % 16.67 % 50 % 25 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 4.17 % 4.17 % 16.67 % 54.17 % 16.67 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 50 % 16.67 % 23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 41.67 % 25 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 25 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 4.17 % 0 % 25 % 41.67 % 25 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 4.17 % 0 % 20.83 % 45.83 % 20.83 %

Comments: Laboratory Sessions: (if applicable) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 27. The laboratory classes were well integrated into the course. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %

28. Help is available. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 29. Allocated time is adequate. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %



13

30. Condition of equipment is acceptable/appropriate. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %


Overall Assessment: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33. I learned a lot from this course. 4.17 % 8.33 % 20.83 % 41.67 % 25 % 34. You would recommend the course to other students.

4.17 % 0 % 33.33 % 41.67 % 20.83 %

35. Overall, I am satisfied with the course. 4.17 % 0 % 33.33 % 37.5 % 20.83 %




14

ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Course Evaluation: Final September, 2013

Compiled Date: 27-Jan-2014 :09:17:42

Foreign Language I (Chinese) (UG308 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 41 Forms Received:40 Participation: 97.56% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Course Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 1. The course objectives were explained. 0 % 0 % 20 % 27.5 % 52.5 % 2. The course outline provided accurate description of the course.

0 % 0 % 22.5 % 35 % 42.5 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 30 % 47.5 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 35 % 42.5 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

0 % 0 % 27.5 % 22.5 % 50 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 30 % 47.5 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 30 % 47.5 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 0 % 0 % 30 % 25 % 45 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

0 % 0 % 27.5 % 22.5 % 47.5 %

Comments on Course Characteristics:

• The course characteristics is good. • Good. • course content is sufficient.

Course Delivery/Teaching Methods/Resource Materials: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

10. The teaching methods were effective. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 37.5 % 40 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 37.5 % 40 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 0 % 0 % 20 % 35 % 45 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 30 % 47.5 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 0 % 0 % 20 % 35 % 45 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter.

0 % 0 % 22.5 % 37.5 % 40 %


• Good for all. • Materials were very helpful. Teaching methods were

great. • his teaching method is very effective.


Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 0 % 0 % 25 % 27.5 % 47.5 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 0 % 0 % 20 % 40 % 40 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 25 % 52.5 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 25 % 50 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 0 % 0 % 25 % 32.5 % 42.5 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 2.5 % 2.5 % 22.5 % 30 % 42.5 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 0 % 0 % 25 % 30 % 45 %



15

23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 25 % 30 % 45 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 0 % 0 % 25 % 27.5 % 47.5 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 25 % 52.5 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 0 % 0 % 25 % 20 % 52.5 %

Comments:

• Dr. Hugo makes this course fun and interesting to learn.

• Interesting teaching methods. Very good lecturer • very good lecturer. his teaching style is really

interesting.

Laboratory Sessions: (if applicable) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 27. The laboratory classes were well integrated into the course. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %



Overall Assessment: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33. I learned a lot from this course. 0 % 0 % 25 % 30 % 45 % 34. You would recommend the course to other students. 0 % 0 % 25 % 25 % 50 %

35. Overall, I am satisfied with the course. 0 % 0 % 22.5 % 22.5 % 55 %


• Very nice overall. • I learned Chinese. • I learned a lot from this course



16

ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Course Evaluation: Final January, 2012 Compiled Date: 29-May-2012 :10:31:53

Foreign Language I (Chinese) (UG308 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 45 Forms Received:37 Participation: 82.22% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu

Course Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 1. The course objectives were explained. 0 % 0 % 0 % 62.16 % 37.84 % 2. The course outline provided accurate description of the course.

0 % 0 % 0 % 64.86 % 35.14 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 0 % 0 % 8.11 % 62.16 % 29.73 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 67.57 % 27.03 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

0 % 0 % 2.7 % 67.57 % 29.73 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 70.27 % 24.32 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 2.7 % 0 % 2.7 % 67.57 % 27.03 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 0 % 0 % 13.51 % 59.46 % 27.03 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

0 % 0 % 8.11 % 62.16 % 29.73 %


10. The teaching methods were effective. 0 % 0 % 0 % 59.46 % 40.54 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 54.05 % 40.54 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 56.76 % 37.84 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 59.46 % 32.43 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 56.76 % 37.84 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 64.86 % 29.73 %


• The professor communicate via personal email which is far better than AIT webmail.


Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 0 % 0 % 5.41 % 56.76 % 35.14 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 0 % 0 % 10.81 % 48.65 % 37.84 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 8.11 % 56.76 % 32.43 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 64.86 % 29.73 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 56.76 % 37.84 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 0 % 0 % 10.81 % 54.05 % 32.43 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 0 % 0 % 13.51 % 54.05 % 29.73 % 23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 8.11 % 54.05 % 32.43 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 54.05 % 40.54 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 48.65 % 43.24 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 0 % 0 % 2.7 % 51.35 % 43.24 %

Comments: Laboratory Sessions: (if applicable) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree



17

27. The laboratory classes were well integrated into the course. 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %




0 % 0 % 0 % 64.86 % 35.14 %



• Very good teacher

• Nice class. Useful, applicable, and interesting.



18



Foreign Language II (Chinese) (UG313 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 21 Forms Received:21 Participation: 100% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu


0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 61.9 % 28.57 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 71.43 % 19.05 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 66.67 % 19.05 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 66.67 % 23.81 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 0 % 9.52 % 9.52 % 61.9 % 19.05 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 71.43 % 19.05 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 71.43 % 19.05 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

0 % 4.76 % 9.52 % 66.67 % 19.05 %


10. The teaching methods were effective. 0 % 4.76 % 0 % 66.67 % 28.57 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 0 % 4.76 % 0 % 66.67 % 28.57 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 0 % 4.76 % 0 % 61.9 % 33.33 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 66.67 % 23.81 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 71.43 % 19.05 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter. 0 % 4.76 % 4.76 % 71.43 % 19.05 %


Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 0 % 4.76 % 0 % 71.43 % 23.81 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 61.9 % 33.33 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 52.38 % 42.86 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 66.67 % 28.57 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 57.14 % 38.1 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 57.14 % 28.57 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 0 % 0 % 9.52 % 66.67 % 23.81 % 23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 76.19 % 19.05 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 61.9 % 33.33 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 61.9 % 33.33 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 0 % 0 % 4.76 % 66.67 % 28.57 %





19




0 % 0 % 9.52 % 61.9 % 28.57 %





20



Foreign Language I (Chinese) (UG308 - Section A) Total Students (Credit) : 25 Forms Received:14 Participation: 56% Faculty 1: Dr. Hugo Yu-Hsiu


0 % 7.14 % 0 % 35.71 % 57.14 %

3. Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth. 0 % 7.14 % 7.14 % 28.57 % 57.14 % 4. The course fulfilled my expectations. 0 % 7.14 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 42.86 % 5. The requirements of the course (projects, papers, exams) were adequately explained.

0 % 7.14 % 0 % 50 % 42.86 %

6. The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate. 0 % 7.14 % 0 % 50 % 42.86 %

7. The workload was appropriate. 0 % 7.14 % 0 % 50 % 42.86 % 8. The grading policy was clearly explained. 0 % 7.14 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 42.86 % 9. Assessment methods were appropriate and effective.

0 % 7.14 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 42.86 %


10. The teaching methods were effective. 0 % 0 % 0 % 57.14 % 42.86 % 11. The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 %

12. The course materials were presented in an organized manner. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 %

13. The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 %

14. The assignments were relevant and useful. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 42.86 % 42.86 % 15. The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 %


Instructor(s) Characteristics: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 16. Was effective in achieving the course objectives. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 % 17. Stimulated my interest in the subject. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 % 18. English communication skills are satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 % 19. Was responsive toward student needs. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 % 20. Treated student with due respect. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 % 21. Was accessible to students outside the class. 0 % 0 % 14.29 % 35.71 % 50 % 22. Provided timely feedback to the class. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 % 23. Overall performance of instructor was satisfactory. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 %

24. Enthusiastic toward teaching. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 50 % 25. Sufficient knowledge of subject area. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 42.86 % 26. I would recommend this instructor to other students. 0 % 0 % 7.14 % 42.86 % 42.86 %





21



Overall Assessment: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33. I learned a lot from this course. 0 % 7.14 % 0 % 57.14 % 35.71 % 34. You would recommend the course to other students.

0 % 0 % 7.14 % 57.14 % 35.71 %



Teaching Evaluation (BA in Chinese Program)

Documents

Transcript of Teaching Evaluation (BA in Chinese Program)