Swiss in the French Foreign Legion Life and warfare in Algeria 1831-1962
-
Upload
wasfuereineurl -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Swiss in the French Foreign Legion Life and warfare in Algeria 1831-1962
Swiss in the French Foreign Legion
Life and warfare in Algeria 1831-1962
Seminararbeit for the Seminar: The Algerian War. History and Memory of a Conflict, 1954-1962.
FS 14 // Historisches Seminar Basel, Professor Patrick Harries.
Author: Wieland Schmid, St. Jakobsstr. 82, 4052 Basel
E-Mail: [email protected]
Number of semesters: 8
1
Contents
1. Introduction 3
2. From the „Reisläufertum“ to the conquest of Algeria
2.1. Swiss in French service
2.2. Creation of the French Foreign Legion and the conquest of Algeria
5
6
3. „Sent there to die“- The starting years for the Swiss legionnaires
3.1. Cultivating Algeria under Swiss command
3.2. Lieutenant Cham and missing adaptation to Arab tactics of war
3.3. Number of Swiss serving in the French Foreign Legion
3.4. Bugeaud and the „razzia“
8
10
12
13
4. From consolidation to loss. Life in Algeria from 1856 to 1962
4.1. The Swiss Legion
4.2. Armée d'Afrique
4.3. Le cafard and the daily life in the Legion
4.4. Moroccon border incidents and interwar period
4.5. Algerian War of Independence
16
17
20
22
25
5. Conclusion 31
6. Appendix
6.1. Tables
6.2. Photos
33
33
7. Selected Bibliography
7.1. Books
7.2. Articles and encyclopedias
7.3. Photos and Pictures
35
36
36
2
1. Introduction
„Comme nos anciens nous défendrons l'Algérie contre le diable et les fellaghas avec nos
drapeaux, HONNEUR, FIDELITE nous tomberons ou nous vaincrons au combat.“1 As heroic this
songtext of the French Foreign Legion may seem it still offers a certain amount of information.
This country seemed to have had a long history as well as an exceptional importance for the
Legion as the men were even ready to sacrifice their lives for it. Another observation not as
obvious without the knowledge of the history of this unit can also be made: Honour and fidelity as
the maxim stated on the flags of the Legion since 1920, had originally been taken from the Swiss
régiment de Diesbach having served the French crown for almost 100 years.2 As we shall see this
is only one of several examples of the ties between the Swiss and the Legion. In one of the most
myth-ranked and respected military units, where foreigners from all over the world offered their
blood, the Swiss did not stand behind. Following the Legion to every corner of the world the Swiss
legionnaires also fought in Algeria, home to the Legion for 130 years.
This term paper will illustrate different aspects of the life Swiss legionnaires led in Algeria from
1831 to 1962. As foreign soldiers the Swiss offer an interesting view on a country colonized and
occupied by France. The Legion offered them the possibility to enter a field of experience outside
of Europe and to make contact with the inhabitans as well as an „exotic“ environment. This
happened in manifold ways martially or peacefully. What led to the forming of the French Foreign
Legion and their deployment in Algeria? What was the legionnaire's life in Algeria like from a
Swiss point of view? What was their involvement in combat actions? What were their feelings and
reactions towards the local population of Algeria?
These questions will be answered with the help of mostly self-made documents of former Swiss
legionnaires which include autobiographies as well as memoirs, letters, literature with an
autobiographic background and even court records which will gain importance towards the end of
the research period. It will only include a selection of available self-made documents of Swiss
legionnaires who served from 1855 to 1965.
The micro-perspective which these sources offer have to be considered carefully. Problematic areas
are the temporal gap between experience and record, memory gaps, ghostwriting and deliberate
modifications. Certain motives like money, sensationalism and politics, which also involved pro
and contra Legion opinions, influenced the perspectives of the Swiss legionnaires. To ensure a
1 Lordick, Volker: Unter der Sonne Nordafrikas. Legionär in Algerien. Stuttgart 2012, p.121. Even the most famous Legion song „le boudin“ (the bloodsausage) mentions the Swiss in the refrain: „Tiens, voilà du boudin, voilà du boudin, voilà du boudin! Pour les Alsaciens, les Suisses et les Lorrains!”2 Bodin, Jérôme: Les Suisses au service de la France. De Louis XI à la Légion étrangère. Paris 1988, p. 358.
3
historical approach the sources must be compared with each other and always have to be
considered under the aspect of their environment.3 Secondary literature will help to fill the gaps
which the accounts of Swiss legionnaires do not cover, especially in the starting years of the
Legion.
The subject of Swiss in the Foreign Legion has already been in the focus of some historians,
however with different time frames and key aspects. Eveline Maradan gives us a good summary of
the history of Swiss in the Legion with her licentiate paper „Les suisses et la legion étrangère de
1831 à 1861.“ In „Endstation Algerien“ Vincenz Oertle covered the lives of Swiss legionnaires in
Algeria during the 1950s with the help of court files. The most important book concerning the
history of the French Foreign Legion is Douglas Porch's „The French Foreign Legion. A Complete
History of the Legendary Fighting Force“ for it covers and links topics like training, battles, rituals
and social environment with a great richness of details. He was able to use the archives of the
Legion in Aubagne which are usually not open for external research. Christian Koller with his
article in Tanja Bührers „Imperialkriege“ and his book „Die Fremdenlegion. Kolonialismus,
Söldnertum, Gewalt“ offers us the results of the latest research into lives of legionnaires.
Similar to Koller this paper includes primarily a view of the lives of Swiss legionnaires, but tries to
embed it in a historical context. The reason for this is because the subject overlaps with numerous
historical fields such as colonial, military, French and Swiss history.
The paper will be arranged in three parts. The Swiss have already had a long history of military
collaboration with France, which will be briefly sketched before the conditions are described
which led to the forming of the Foreign Legion and its deployment to Algeria. Thus the Swiss
involvement and their role during the French engagement in North Africa can be better understood.
In the second part the starting years of the Legion will be covered as it slowly settled into and
adapted to the Algerian warfare. The third and most important part will present the micro-
perspectives of the Swiss legionnaires concerning their experiences in Algeria until the retreat to
mainland France.
3 Koller, Christian: Die Fremdenlegion. Kolonialismus, Söldnertum, Gewalt. Paderborn 2013, pp. 14-16.
4
2. From the „ Reisläufertum“ to the conquest of Algeria
2.1. Swiss in French service
The Kings of France had a particular interest in two strategic goods in Switzerland: the passes over
the Alps and the military potential formed by the inhabitants.4
The first Kapitulation between France and the Swiss Confederation was arranged in 1474. These
Kapitulationen were contracts which allowed the French to recruit troops on confederate territory.
These written contracts were important because they brought a certain control and order into the
Swiss mercenary business. The former Reisläufer5 who individually looked for employment
became a mercenary in an organized unit and was promised proper treatment and payment.6
The military migration of young Swiss males had mostly economic reasons. Due to population
growth, food shortages and poverty many Reisläufer looked for foreign service. But they were not
only attracted by money and loot but also by glory and adventure.7
During the reign of Louis XIV the Swiss regiments which stood in French service were not in
mercenary service like the German or the Scottish regiments but rather a paid ally. They were
under the jurisdiction of their cantons, whose representatives were the officers, and they had a free
choice of religion. The Swiss knew how to use their special status in France and many known
Swiss became famous field marshals or generals in French service,8 although the path of an officer
was only open to certain aristocratic or rich and influential families. Some posts were even
inheritable and this also led to a secluded and exclusive officer caste.9
On August 10, 1792, about 650 Swiss died while defending King Louis XVI during the siege of
the Tuileries Palace.10 Their courage and obedience to the crown induced the Constituent Assembly
4 Führer, Hans Rudolf / Eyer, Robert-Peter: Schweizer in "Fremden Diensten". Verherrlicht und verurteilt. Zürich2006, p. 63. 5 Reisläufer, came from the middle high German „die reis louffen“. Translated into English it would mean, go to war.The Reisläufer individually looked for employment as his service was not regulated by official contracts and thus hewas not under any control of the authorities, contrary to the mercenary who committed himself to a service approvedand mostly organized by the authorities. See: Czouz-Tornare, Alain-Jacques: „Reisläufer.“ In: Historisches Lexikonder Schweiz s. v., e-HLS, access January 10, 2014 (Printversion: Basel 2011).6 Führer: Schweizer in "Fremden Diensten", p. 60. The Kapitulation of 1474 was the first one with an official charactereven though there were already similar arrangements with different barons and German or Italian cities. See:Hochheimer, Albert: Verraten und verkauft. Die Geschichte der europäischen Söldner. Stuttgart 1967, p. 54.7 Führer: Schweizer in "Fremden Diensten", pp. 39-40.8 Hochheimer: Verraten und verkauft, pp. 166-170.9 Führer: Schweizer in "Fremden Diensten", p. 111.10 Bodin: Les Suisses, p. 268. Already in 1497 King Charles VIII established the Compagnie des Cent-Suisses, hisprivate guard which was more a show-piece than a military corps. The Swiss Guards was the unit which did the actualfighting on numerous battlefields. The French kings offered high pensions, economic concessions and toll freedom.See: Bodin: Les suisses, pp. 69-70 and Henry, Philippe: „Schweizergarden.“ In: Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz s.v.,e-HLS, access January 10, 2014 (Printversion: Basel 2012).
5
of the Revolution to prohibit foreign units to serve in the „new“ French Army. But under the
pressure of the Austrian invasion and under the threat of losing Paris, the government called back
4000 Swiss who had only been discharged a month before. They were placed in the Légion franche
étrangère and the Légion germanique. Under the rule of the Directory the recruitment of foreigners
was continued and a further Kapitulation brought a new wave of Swiss mercenaries. Napoleon also
depended on foreign mercenaries to cover his losses and even after the Bourbonic Restoration in
1814 the French still continued to rely on foreign soldiers.11
2.2. Creation of the French Foreign Legion and the conquest of Algeria
The Legion itself and some of its historians like to see it as a continuation of France's reliance on
foreign and especially Swiss troops12. Albert Hochheimer thinks that the Legion is most likely
comparable to the Swiss Guards regiments under Louis XIV and Louis XV13. Paul de Vallière
sees the reason of the creation of the French Foreign Legion in keeping some of the Swiss soldiers
who were dismissed by Charles X14. The Bourbonic Restoration relied in part on foreign
mercenaries to enforce the king's authority. These were at that time six Swiss regiments and the
regiment of Hohenlohe, in which all nationalities could serve. The Swiss Guards particularly
became the hated symbols of royal authority. Even in the French Army the Swiss were not popular
as they earned double to triple the wages of their counterparts in French regiments. Swiss officers
also occupied one rank above the equivalent command position in a line regiment. These positions
were mostly aquired by court intrigue and money and not by ability.15 The resentments towards the
Swiss exploded in November 1828 into a small battle between a French grenadier regiment and
the Swiss at Versailles. Two years later, during the end of the July 1830 Revolution which toppled
the Bourbonic Restoration, the civilians took vengeance on the Swiss who lost 300 men in the
uprising.16
The revolution woke the hope among many European liberals and nationalists that the new Citizen
King Louis Philippe would spread liberty and equality through Europe. But after an initial period
11 Boyd, Douglas: Die französische Fremdenlegion. Hamburg 2009, p. 79. An estimated 90'000 Swiss soldiers foughtfor France during the Napoleonic Wars. See: Bodin: Les Suisses, p. 287.12 Porch, Douglas: The French Foreign Legion. A Complete History of the Legendary Fighting Force, New York 1991, p. 2.13 Hochheimer: Verraten und Verkauft, p. 292.14 de Vallière, Paul: Treue und Ehre. Geschichte der Schweizer in Fremden Diensten. Lausanne 1940, p.721 and p. 743.15 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 3.16 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 80, and de Vallière: Treue und Ehre, p .720. There were already fights between Swiss and Parisian workers in July 1827 and June 1828 as well as police reports of mistreated civilians in October 1829. See: Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 3.
6
of surprise with uprisings throughout the continent the monarchies of Europe had restored
themselves and secured their reign again everywhere.17 From every part of Europe the unsuccessful
revolutionaries, deserters and dissidents fled to France. The post revolutionary government had
unilaterally renounced extradition treaties which had been arranged in the shadow of the Congress
of Vienna in 1815. These foreigners had no money, no home and no work, which made them a
ticking time bomb for the French government under Louis Philippe.18
Porch rather sees the tradition of France offering asylum to foreign refugees, especially to those
escaping political repression, than that of hiring foreign mercenaries, which to de Vallière and
Hochheimer the légion étrangère appears to owe its existence. For him the Legion was created in
response to a short-term refugee crisis. Although he admits that the mercenary tradition offered a
solution to the crisis, the Foreign Legion was still „[...] not conceived as a corps that would
'continue the traditions' of the Swiss and the Hohenlohe regiment.“19
This opinion is supported by the fact that on August 14, 1830 the Swiss regiments were officially
disbanded and with the Treaty of Lucerne April 24, 1831 France renouced its Kapitulationen with
the Swiss Republic. The Hohenlohe regiment followed the disbandment on January 5, 1831. It
seems that the tradition of France hiring foreign mercenaries had ended. Active recruitment
through French recruiters in the Swiss cantons had stopped and this ended a more than 300-year-
old tradition. The new French government was not interested in long term employment of
foreigners any longer and was certainly not going to look for more of them outside of France.
The Legion was to be used as an outlet for the unwelcome and an asylum for the misfortunate as
War Minister Marshal Soult wrote in a letter.20 Marshal Nicolas Jean-de-Dieu Soult was a veteran
of the Napoleonic wars and the French Foreign Legion was his idea of dealing with the refugee
problem. On March 10, 1831 King Louis-Philippe decided to create the French Foreign Legion by
signing the decree which the House of Representatives had passed a day earlier. Soult combined
the idea of a regiment which was exclusively for use abroad with a still intact navy and hoped to
gain an overseas empire which could substitute the lost European Empire under Napoleon.21 Even
though there were different options for an assignment overseas the Legion was most likely to see
its first action in Algeria22 because of an incident called the Bacri Affair. This made clear that the
17 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 1-2.18 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 83.19 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 5.20 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 3-5. A depot was ordered to receive refugees and foreign deserters only. Foreign workers employed in France as well as non-naturalized soldiers of the Hohenlohe regiment were to be turned down.21 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 83, and Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 1.22 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 1. For example: Guadaloupe, Martinique, Greece or Italy.
7
Legion was going to be primarily one thing: a tool of imperialism.23
In 1796 two Jewish merchants from Algiers, Bacri and Busnach shipped grain to the Directory to
prevent a famine in France. They sold the French debt to Dey Omar, the Turkish governor of
Algiers. The promissory notes were passed down to every successor until Dey Hussein took over
power. On the eve of a Muslim feast in April 1827, the French consul was visiting the Dey in his
palace to bring greetings of the French government as it was the custom. Hussein reminded the
consul of the unpaid debts whereupon he received a rude answer, which tempted the Dey to hit the
consul with his fly flap.24
The incident became a major diplomatic crisis and the French press clamoured for revenge. Next to
economical interests the Bourbonic King Charles X thought that a foreign adventure would distract
the people from his unpopular government. A blockade was installed but it soon became clear that
this would have little impact and so an invasion was launched on June 14, 1830. In a little more
than a year the invasion force was joined by the Foreign Legion.25
Instead of the Kapitulationen the Foreign Legion offered the Swiss the possibility to still continue
and serve France as Reisläufer. A number of mostly Swiss patricians and rich bourgois used this
option.26
3. „Sent there to die“- The starting years for the Swiss legionnaires
3.1 Cultivating Algeria under Swiss command
The first commander of the Foreign Legion was the Swiss Baron Christoph Anton Stoffel. Born in
July 1780 in Madrid he was the offspring of Jacob Stoffel, an officer in the service of Spain from
Arbon, Canton Thurgau.27 Christoph Stoffel had served France since 1807 and taken part in
campaigns throughout Europe.28 After the Napoleonic Wars he participated in the Spanish
Campaign in 1823 and retired in 1826.29
The denunciations of officers who allegedly were not faithful to the July-Monarchy led to
thousands of dismissals. The lack of officers and non-commissioned officers caused the
23 Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 31.24 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 81.25 Evans, Martin: Algeria. France's Undeclared War, New York 2012, pp. 8-9.26 Bodin: Les Suisses, p. 310.27 Bodin: Les Suisses, pp. 306-307.28 Oertle, Vincenz: Endstation Algerien. Schweizer Fremdenlegionäre. Dreizehn Lebensbilder der 1950er Jahre. Appenzell 2007, p. 22.29 Maradan, Eveline: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère de 1831 à 1861. Fribourg 1987, p. 24.
8
government to reinlist the demi-soldes, officers of the Napoleonic era like Stoffel who were mostly
rather old and not really up to date with new drills and tactics.30 There were diverging sentiments
about Stoffel. Some French officers described him as ignorant, inept and not worthy of a
command. Others thought that he was a brave and energetic commander and a skillful organiser.31
Nonetheless Stoffel was appointed to command the légion étrangère in May 1831 and had to try
and form a fighting unit out of these foreign revolutionaries and dissidents from different social
backgrounds. They were kept in different camps in the country to avoid any problems with French
citizens.32 In June 1831 he already complained:
„Among the 26 officers who are here, only eight are competent at their job. The others have been retired fromthe service for a long time, are foreigners or from the cavalry. It is of the utmost urgency that we be sent goodline officers who can speak German.“33
In August he asked the Minister of War to promote Swiss officers and non-commissioned officers
(NCO) to instructors, because in his eyes they were already familiar with the French administration
and could speak German. His request was not followed and so he looked for good Swiss officers
and NCOs himself. Though Stoffel found a couple of Swiss from former Swiss Guards regiments
who were willing to join, the Legion was still lacking good officers.34
By 1835, 107 foreign officers, mostly Swiss, German, Polish and Spanish served in the Legion.
The heterogeneous command and the lack of enough officers led to poor organisation, so it was no
wonder that discipline was very bad. Because of drunken brawls it was common that community
prisons had to keep up to 56 legionnaires in custody. Until the middle of May 1831 the Legion was
on the eve of mutiny and the battalion commanders had to call in the national guard to help the
police arrest the ringleaders. The decision to send the Legion to Algeria had nothing to do with its
usefulness as a military unit. Stoffel's men were sent there to die.35 In November 1831 the Legion
set foot on the land that would become its home for the next 130 years.36 The Legion was going to
form a part of the evolving Armée d'Afrique, but it only represented a minority of the soldiers.37
The overall situation in Algeria did not look good for France. The original troops who performed
30 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 85.31 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 25.32 Hornung, Peter: Die Legion. Europas letzte Söldner. München 1989, pp. 20-22.33 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 7-8. Cited in: SHAT, Xb 726, 30 June 1831.34 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 25.35 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 83, and Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 8.36 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 11. We already find Swiss settlers in Algeria by 1830 mostly interested inagriculture. See: Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 149.37 Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 32. At the turn of the century the Legion counted about 12000 men out of 83000 ofthe Armée d' Afrique.
9
the invasion in summer 1830 were demoralized and eager to go home.38 The National Assembly
was not sure what to do with Algeria and public support was fading. Different options were
possible: withdrawal, limited occupation or full-scale conquest. But there was a lack of consensus
and nobody came up with a clear answer what to do.39
To occupy the newly arrived Legion the commanding officer in Algeria, General Savary, Duc de
Rovigo split the Legion up, gave the various parts the least desirable jobs and sent them to the most
disease-ridden posts. For example parts of the Legion were sent into a swamp between the towns
of Boufarik and Duala, where they were to build streets. With daily hard work in breast deep dark
water, swarmed by clouds of mosquitos the legionnaires finished the work under the watchful eyes
of Stoffel in only five weeks.40 This was to be the kind of occupation which the Legion was to
perform most of the time during its first years in Algeria: building roads, tunnels or generally
doing construction work41. After only one year Stoffel was replaced by the French Colonel
Combes42.
3.2. Lieutenant Cham and missing adaptation to Arab tactics of war
From the military point of view France was in an unfavourable position. Originally the soldiers
camped outside of Algiers but were relocated behind the city walls for security reasons. Only then
Algiers became a besieged town, so General Savary decided to set up blockhouses at strategic
points to give the city some breathing space. On May 23, 1832 27 legionnaires and 25 Chasseur d'
Afrique were attacked near such a blockhouse. The Swiss commanding officer, Salomon de Musis
and the cavalry disappeared in order to get reinforcements, leaving the legionnaires under the
command of the Swiss Lieutenant Cham.43 The muzzleloaders which the Legion used at that time
only worked well at a range of 100 meters. The best effect was achieved when the men were
disciplined and stood still while one row was firing on the enemy and the other was reloading.44
After the cavalry had left, the legionnaires only shot one volley on the approaching Arabs45 and
38 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 11.39 Evans, Martin: Algeria. France's Undeclared War. New York 2012, p. 9.40 Hornung: Die Legion, p. 24.41 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 95.42 Bodin: Les Suisses, p. 308.43 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 16.44 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 93.45 The reports of the Swiss legionnaires mostly label the enemy with the term Arab although they were not alwaysnecessarily fighting against Arabs. From the Algerian War of Independence on the term changed to rebel, fellagha orfell. Heinrich Spinner was able to distinguish the different people and highlighted specific charateristics. See: Spinner,Heinrich: Algier, Mexiko, Rom. Schicksale eines Schweizers in fremden Kriegsdiensten. Zürich 1901, p. 34- 35. PaulStrupler also makes a difference between Arabs, Kabyles, and Berbers. Strupler, Paul: Fünf Jahre Fremdenlegion.
10
then broke line to reach a small forest nearby. This proved to be a fatal mistake, for the men were
quickly caught up with and surrounded. The survivors were offered the choice of converting to
Islam or getting killed one by one. Except for one prisoner all refused and were massacred.
Lieutenant Cham had the doubtful honor of being the first Legion officer to die in combat.46
Apart from the Arab resistance which was led by the young Abd el-Kadr, who was declared Sultan
of the West by three tribes, the Legion had to cope with the difficult terrain.47 Algeria was a country
of glaring extremes. The coastal plain was often an unbearably hot zone of marshland, flooding,
and malaria. It lay in front of the Tell Atlas ranges, with a high plain behind it. Further south were
the Saharan Atlas mountain ranges, and then the inhospitable desert.48
But during the months of January to March the Swiss legionnaire Heinrich Spinner described the
climate at the coastal region as „healthy“.49 Frequently two extremes were still common. Either
extreme heat, which made marching with field pack a torture, or extreme cold, especially at night,
and in winter snowfall was not uncommon.50
Much of the fighting between 1830 and 1847 took place in the northern Tell Atlas, which was
formed of deep valleys, narrow passes and high mountain peaks. So it was the ideal terrain for
ambushes and hit and run tactics where local knowledge could be used to deadly effect.51
Until 1840 the strategy of the French army was to launch their heavy columns from their coastal
enclaves into the back country to counter the Algerian resistance. This strategy only worked when
the Algerians accepted the battle, which mostly did not happen. They let the French columns
exhaust themselves as they pushed their artillery and supply wagons through the roadless bled, as
the back country of North Africa was called. As soon as the French started to turn home the Arabs
attacked the demoralized and exhausted troops. Porch states:
„This was a marvelous tactical approach, for it denied to the French their superiority in firepower and disciplinewhile exploiting the superior mobility and resilience of the Arabs. The native resistance retained the advantageof surprise and was able to control the level of its casualties.“52
Frauenfeld 1928, p. 54.46 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 16. Next to Lieutenant Cham three others Swiss officers died before 1850 inthe Legion: In 1836 Second Lieutenant Roussillon, in 1837 Captain Seyboz and in 1843 Second Lieutenant Berset.See: Bodin: Les Suisses, p. 310.47 Bührer, Tanja (publ.): Imperialkriege von 1500 bis heute. Strukturen-Akteure-Lernprozesse. Paderborn 2011, p. 436, and Julien, Charles-André; Ageron, Charles-Robert: Histoire de l'Algérie contemporaine. Vol.1. La conquête et les débuts de la colonisation (1827-1871). Paris 1979, p. 97.48 Evans: Algeria, p. 10.49 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 34.50 Moser, Jean: In der Fremdenlegion. Erlebnisse in der Wüste Sahara und auf Madagskar. Bern 1911, p. 20, andSeiler, Hans: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion. Aus meinen Tagebuchblättern. Abgedruckt in: NeueZürcher Zeitung Jg: 1914, Nr. 117.51 Evans: Algeria, p. 10.52 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 19.
11
The French later slowly learnt and adapted themselves to this kind of guerilla warfare, but for the
time being the desperate efforts of chasing a nomadic enemy and trying to force it to fight
European-style field battles, led France to make diplomatic advances. The French Governor of
Oran recognized Abd el-Kadr's status as an Emir over the tribes in Oranais and Abd el-Kadr
accepted French sovereignty over the parts of Algeria that had already been occupied.53
But the deadlier enemy than the natives were diseases, then called „fever“, which covered typhoid,
pneumonia and malaria. From 1831 to 1835 about 3200 legionnaires either died or were released
from service because they were too weak to serve.54
3.3. Number of Swiss serving in the French Foreign Legion
In December 1832 the Legion was organised in seven national battalions, of which the first
battalion consisted of Swiss and former members of the Hohenlohe Regiment and the second and
third battalions consisted of Swiss and Germans. The other four were Spanish, Italian, Dutch-
Belgian and Polish.55 The first batallion was commanded by the Swiss Salomon de Musis and the
second by Commander Moret, son of Swiss parents.56 Although there were three battalions called
Swiss the total number of Swiss soldiers was very low compared to the total of 3168 legionnaires
stationed at Mustapha during an inspection in that month. The inspector noted that the 94 Swiss
from the former Swiss Guards of the Bourbons were zealous. Compared to the 2196 Germans in
these battalions the number of Swiss was almost negligible. But in the eyes of the inspector they
formed the better part because the Germans were deserters, political refugees, medical students,
lawyers or obscure solicitors and therefore they had to be closely watched.57
But how come there were three battalions for Swiss and only 94 Swiss serving in the Legion? Jean
Paul Hallo's chart shows, that shortly before the departure of the Legion to Spain in 1835 the Swiss
approximately made up a quarter of its soldiers58. So how can this difference in numbers be
explained? The concept of national battalions was not watertight. For example many of the 6 th
Dutch-Belgian Battalion consisted mostly of Germans who had deserted over the Belgian frontier
and were then directed to French barracks by the authorities.59 So it is possible that a part of the
Swiss legionnaires were counted as Germans. This theory is supported by the fact, that like the
53 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 95.54 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 16.55 Montagnon, Pierre: Histoire de la Légion. De 1831 à nos jours, Paris 2012, p. 21.56 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 36.57 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 14.58 Hallo, Jean Paul: Monsieur Légionnaire. L'homme et ses tradition. Paris 1994, p. 151.59 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 14.
12
French the Swiss needed a special permission and those who still liked to serve France and not
willing to get a permit probably signed in as Germans.60 There is still a huge mismatch between the
94 Swiss including the few who presumably signed as Germans and the 12'37861 Swiss serving the
French King in 1816. On the basis of pure numbers the idea must be abandoned that the Swiss
formed a recruitment base for the French Foreign Legion in the beginning.
Nevertheless the national battalions caused problems. After the disaster at the battle of Macta
which ended the tenuous peace with Abd el-Kadr, the Italian and the Polish battalions accused one
another of being incompetent. So Colonel Bernelle decided to mix up the national battalions. This
decision was also backed by the fact, that with the unreliable nature of national recruitment, it was
impossible to keep the battalions at full strength.62 Already in 1835 Stoffel noted: „Es war ein
Fehler, nationale Batallions aufzustellen. Die Fremden hätten sofort in gemischten Einheiten
aufgestellt werden müssen.“63
During the first few years in Algeria the Legion had spent more time in hospitals, draining swamps
or building roads than in combat thus preparing the way for colonization. After only four years in
Algeria the Legion already left its new home to find itself in a new war which almost cost its
existence. On August 17, 1835 the Legion disembarked at Tarragona to enter a new adventure in
Spain.64
3.4. Bugeaud and the „razzia“
After the ancienne Légion was almost completely sacrificed in the civil war between Don Carlos
and Isabella II. the remnants of this Legion returned to France in 1839 where most of the soldiers
reinlisted for the nouvelle Légion, which had been created on December 16, 1835. This new
formation arrived in Algeria in 1836 and was given the task to ensure the security of the Mitidja
plain south of Algiers.
The treaty of Tafna with Abd el-Kadr in 1837 gave the French time to capture Constantine, an
attempt which the French had already undertaken in 1836. During this siege against a formidable
fortified town the Legion performed outstandingly, but it was not the first time that the Legion was
praised for an exceptional combat performance.65
60 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 36.61 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 72. Maradan shows that the Legion attracted more Swiss at the endof century than at the beginning.62 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 98.63 Hornung: Die Legion, p. 25.64 Porch: The French Foreign Legion. p. 21.65 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 51-52. The new Legion was recruited in haste, poorly trained and not used to
13
Abd el-Kadr continued establishing his dominion, which led to the war being resumed in
November 1839. Parallel to establishing a statelike organisation he transformed the hit and run
tactics, ambushes and sieges of isolated French outposts into a coherent strategic system. With the
nomination of Thomas Bugeaud as governor-general in 1840, the French Army finally started to
adapt to the North African warfare.66 Bugeaud showed his flexibility during the siege of a French
base at the Tafnas river which had been attacked by tribes who were allied with Abd el-Kadr in
April 1836.67 Bugeaud was given the task of reinforcing that camp and he did so by using methods
which he had learnt in the Spanish War of Independence where he had operated against guerrillas.
His views on how to fight this war were adapted for the Legion. First of all he stopped using heavy
artillery and heavy waggons. He only allowed supplies and light artillery which could be
transported by mules.68 Bugeaud stated the necessity of the mules in a letter to the Minister of War
on June 16, 1836:
„Ce qu'il faut aussi pour faire la guerre avec succès, ce sont des brigades de mulets militairement organisés, afinde ne dépendre pas des habitants du pays, de pouvoir se porter partout avec légèreté pour suivre l'ennemi surtous les points où il se retire [...]”.69
He introduced a new kind of mobile warfare different from the standard European-style battles.
This gave the initiative back to the French. The Emir was surprised by the new flexibility of the
columns and also by the massed infantry fire which replaced the heavy artillery. To make the
infantry fire more effective Bugeaud introduced a trick which he had learnt in Spain. The musket
shot was cut into four parts which were rammed down the barral on to a normal shot. This kind of
grapeshot was devastating at close range and proved very useful against an enemy who liked to
work at knife-point. With these new tactics he ended the siege and was able to defeat Abd el-Kadr
in the battle of the Sikkak river.70
When Bugeaud became general-governor he transformed his tactics into an overall strategic
system. In order to keep the operating distance of his light columns high, he set up a chain of
fortified supply depots. One of these depots was at Sidi-bel-Abbès, a town 100 kilometers south of
Oran. This town was to be transformed into a city which became the headquarters of the Legion,
linchpin and home in Algeria until 1962.71
campaigning in the African climate so that of 1600 men only about 1200 were able to fight.66 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 70.67 Bührer: Imperialkriege, p.437. Before his appointment as governor Bugeaud criticized the French policy in Algeriaand pledged for a force of at least 100'000 soldiers and a colonization by European settlers.68 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, pp. 109- 110.69 Azan, Paul: Par l'épée et par la charrue. Ecrits et discours du Général Bugeaud. Paris 1948, p. 4.70 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 73.71 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 118.
14
Bugeaud's new strategy meant two things for the Legion: marching and fighting. Before Bugeaud
took over as general-governor, the Legion had been spread out all over the country in fixed
garrisons guarded by blockhouses like sitting ducks. Now the Legion left these disease-ridden
posts and went on the road outmanoeuvering the enemy. At that time mules were rare in Algeria so
the soldiers had to shoulder most of their equipment themselves. In spite of the streamlining of the
40kg European satchel, it was still a torture to march in blistering heat. The most important thing
was to keep up with the marching column in spite of holes in the shoes and bloody feet covered in
blisters. To fall back meant to risk a painful death by the enemy.72
Because of this new mobile warfare which Bugeaud had introduced, Abd el-Kadr became even
more cautious and elusive. Bugeaud tried to make his columns even more agile and they were able
to operate for days on short rations. But if the Emir did not attack or Bugeaud could not hunt him
down he just took the battle to his „backyard“ by making war on the livelihood of the natives.73 He
introduced the razzia, a style of warfare which was going to affect the future conflicts in Algeria.
The word razzia came from the Algerian-Arabic word ghāziya which meant something like war-
raid. It was defined as a campaign of punishment or vengeance against native tribes, which were
guilty of committing a crime against France or who were otherwise unruly.74 Bugeaud made it his
strategy. He wrote:
„[...] pour les réduire, il faut attaquer leurs intérêts.: [...]; il faut s'appesantir sur le territoire de chaque tribu; ilfaut s'arranger de manière à avoir assez de vivres pour y rester le temps nécessaire pour détruire les villages,couper les arbres fruitiers, brûler ou arracher les récoltes, vider les silos, fouiller les ravins, les roches et lesgrottes, pour y saisir les femmes, les enfants, les vieillards, les troupeaux et le mobilier; ce n'est qu'ainsi qu'onpeut faire capituler ces fiers montagnards.“75
To devastate the country for years even date palms were chopped down and the wells were
poisoned. Some of the cattle was slaughtered immediatly for consumption, the rest was taken along
or scattered. For Douglas Boyd this was total war. Porch thought of the razzia more as „a form of
economic warfare“.76 It was also the start of a war of relocation which found its peak in the
Algerian War of Independence under a strategy called the guerre révolutionnaire. Those who
survived or could not hide from the razzia were taken back to the base. Young women were also
used as wives77.
The year of 1847 proved to be a big moment for the conquest because Abd el-Kadr finally
72 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 119. 73 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 74.74 Bührer: Imperialkriege, p.435.75 Azan: Par l'épée, p. 112.76 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 74, and Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 118.77 Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 118.
15
surrendered and was exiled. But there was still resistance in the mountainous regions of the
Kabyles.78
4. From consolidation to loss. Life in Algeria from 1856 to 1962
4.1. The Swiss Legion
The Legion took part in the Crimean campaign, a war ignited by the new emperor Napoleon III. It
was a controversial decision to deploy the Foreign Legion because the conquest of Algeria was so
recent. During the war a second Légion étrangère was founded which mainly consisted of Swiss
soldiers. Put under the leadership of the former federal council Ulrich Ochsenbein this „Swiss
Legion“ revived some of the traditions of the former Kapitulationen with the Ancien Régime. For
example it was commanded by Swiss officers, who had a distinct green and red uniform. As in the
old Kapitulationen Ochsenbein's men enjoyed privileges, particularly the benefit of the military
court established by the Swiss laws. Ochsenbein chose officers from influential and aristocratic
families and sent them to Switzerland hoping that they would recruit further volunteers.79
One of these volunteers was the young Emil Fischer-Miville, who was born in Basel and in 1855
worked in Paris. While in Paris he watched French troops parade and this aroused his interest in
the French Army. „Dies erregte in mir den Wunsch, Soldat zu werden, [...] um unser Glück im
Soldatenleben zu suchen und Abenteuer zu erleben, denn fremde Länder zu sehen war stets mein
Ideal.”80 When he heard that in March 1855 the French Ministry of War was forming a „Swiss
Legion“ he joined it. With 1300 other volunteers, mostly from the cantons of Bern, Vaud and
Geneva, the Swiss Legion never reached the required strength to be deployed in the Crimean War.
So on April 16, 1856 it became the 1er Régiment étranger which was sent to Algeria in the same
year. With their new Swiss Colonel Meyer from the town of Olten they were garrisoned in
Philippeville and fought campaigns in Kabylia.81
At the beginning Fischer-Miville's regiment had to fight dysentery caused by bad water and fruit.
He also suffered from dysentery but was warned by his captain not to go to the hospital in
78 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 74, Boyd: Die französische Fremdenlegion, p. 120, and Evans: Algeria, p. 14.79 Bodin: Les Suisses, pp. 311-312, and Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 45. Green and red are still considered the house colors of the Legion. See: Oertle: Endstation Algerien, p. 23.80 Nordmann, Theodor: Emil Fischer-Miville als Unteroffizier in der französischen Fremdenlegion. (1855-1858). Basel1931, p. 211.81 Bodin: Les Suisses, pp. 312-313, and Nordmann: Emil Fischer-Miville, pp. 211-228. Unfortunately Fischer's storyends in the middle of his period of service in Algeria. The second half of his story was announced but not included forthe Basler Jahrbuch of 1932 .
16
Philippeville as he would not return alive. He described the suffering in the hospitals: „Es starben
auch wirklich viele unserer Leute und meistens die kräftigsten. Die Latrinen waren ständig
belagert, und nachts lagen Dutzende in deren Nähe, die vor Leibschmerzen nicht mehr gehen
konnten.”82 Fortunately he recovered and was able to join his company which was digging out
water pipelines in the bled. There Fischer-Miville's writings show romantic scenes at the camp fire
indicating a certain grade of homesickness and melancholia among the Swiss: „Allabendlich
versammelten wir uns um das Wachtfeuer und mit Begleitung der Musik sangen wir unsere
schönen Schweizerlieder, worüber unsere Offiziere grosse Freude bezeugten.”83
4.2. Armée d'Afrique
Already in 1848 with the founding of Swiss Federal State, the government had forbidden the
arrangement of new Kapitulationen. In 1859 it passed a law forbiding Swiss to serve in non-
national parts of foreign armies such as foreign regiments because of the competition between
France and Britain enticing new Swiss recruits in course of the Crimean War . So it was still
possible for Swiss to join the national army of a nation. Because it was not clear how to classify
the French Foreign Legion, enlistment in it was tolerated as it counted as a „foreign national
troop“.84
Apart from adventures as we have seen with Fischer-Miville, the reasons for a Swiss to join the
Legion were usually as manifold as the number of the people who signed the contract. These were
mostly unemployement, poverty, wanderlust, depressions, escape from prosecution and
lovesickness. Sometimes cases were described where Swiss had signed contracts after being
intoxicated by recruiters.85 After medical examinations and a short stay at Fort Saint-Jean at
Marseille the volunteers were transferred to North Africa by ship. This trip over the Mediterranean
was often very emotional. Heinrich Spinner, who boarded the steamboat on January 16, 1864,
described these feelings:
„Obschon ich all' meinen Mut zusammen nahm, um die in meiner Brust wogenden Gefühle zurückzudrängen,und alles, was hinter mir lag, in das Meer der Vergessenheit zu versenken, so konnte ich dennoch nicht umhin,wehmütige Blicke nach der schönen Seestadt zurückzusenden, von der ich jetzt und damit zugleich von Europa,und wer weiss, vielleicht auf immer, Abschied nahm.“86
82 Nordmann: Emil Fischer-Miville, p. 230.83 Nordmann: Emil Fischer-Miville, p. 231. A similiar mood is also expressed in Gottfried Keller's poem „Schlafwandel“.84 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, pp. 99-101, Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 133, and Oertle:Endstation Algerien, pp. 29-30.85 Oertle: Endstation Algerien, pp. 40-57, and Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 177- 186.86 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 27.
17
The departure from the European mainland meant a big breach in his life, as there was no turning
back because of the geographical barrier which the Mediterranean represented. After the arrival in
Mers-el-Kebir near Oran a new period began in Spinner's life. In Oran, a town of 20'000
inhabitants, he was fascinated by all the different cultures. He described the big cultural diversity
between Arabs, Moors, Berbers, Kabyles, Sub-Saharan Africans and Jews. Among the European
colonists he distinguished between Spaniards, Italians, Alsatians, French and even Swiss87. He
described the living together of all these different cultures as follows:
„Im Ganzen genommen und abgesehen von den zeitweiligen Aufständen und vereinzelten Anfällen, welchenhauptsächlich Kolonisten zum Opfer fallen, kann gesagt werden, dass die Eingeborenen sich mit denEingewanderten ziemlich friedlich vertragen.“88
In his eyes Algeria had a relatively peaceful time, which did not mean that there were no more
conflicts between the colonists and the original inhabitants. Spinner had a certain admiration for
the Arabs and Kabyles. He described them as very frugal and tough, easily bearing with hunger
and thirst. They were: „[...] abgehärtete Natursöhne, gegenüber denen wir Nordländer ein
verweichlichtes Geschlecht genannt werden müssen.”89
The recruits were quartered in a tent camp near Oran, where training began immediatly. They had
to learn the twelve movements of loading and fireing a muzzleloader. On guard duty they were
reminded that Algeria was far from being a safe and peaceful country: „[...] wobei man uns
einschärfte, die grösste Wachsamkeit zu entfalten, da die Araber schon öfters Schildwachen
überfallen und ihnen ohne weiteres den Kopf abgeschnitten hätten [...]“.90 Apart from military
training, guard duty and cleaning Spinner had also spare time to explore Oran. He described
military concerts in public parks and also wanted to visit a mosque: „[...] einmal kam mir sogar
der Einfall, das Innere einer Moschee zu besichtigen, was jedoch an meiner Weigerung, die
Schuhe auszuziehen scheiterte. Andere Länder, andere Sitten!“91
Spinner showed himself fascinated by other units who fought alongside the Foreign Legion in
Algeria. The Zouaves recruited from Kabyles, other tribes and colonists were very successful and
had a good reputation on the battlefield. He praised their excellent esprit de corps, and thought that
they got along well with the legionnaires. In contrast he saw in the Turcos, descendants of Turks
from the Ottoman Empire and North African women, half savages:
87 By 1830 there were Swiss colonists in Algeria who were particularly interested in agriculture. But this individualcolonization cost a lot of lives See: Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 149.88 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 36. „Anfälle“ could mean „incidents“.89 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 35.90 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 38.91 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 39.
18
„Physisch sind die Turcos meist hohe, kräftige Gestalten, mit blitzenden Augen, schneeweissen Zähnen,zugleich aber auch einem Ausdruck im Gesicht, der unverkennbar etwas Bestialisches an sich hat; derkahlgeschorene, nur mit einem in Form eines Büschels hervorspringenden Zopf versehene Kopf erinnertunwillkürlich an die Pfahlbautenbewohner Helvetiens.“92
They were commanded by French officers and in Spinner's eyes not very sociable. „Der Disziplin
unhold, sind es streit- und händelsüchtige Gesellen, mit denen nicht gut Kirschen essen ist und die
bei der geringsten Veranlassung zur Waffe greifen. Sie werden deshalb auch gemieden.“93
In his eyes both the Chasseur d'Afrique and the Spahis were excellent cavalry. The Chasseur
d'Afrique were a light cavalry which consisted mostly of French volunteers who were looking for a
quick advancement. The Spahis were a light cavalry made up of indigenous men used for
reconnaissance, espionage, police work and capturing deserters. Their loyalty was problematic and
not always guaranteed.94
After less than three months in Algeria Spinner and his comrades were sent to Mexico on April 1,
1864.They had looked forward to this trip but were sorely diappointed as many of them died of
various diseases and fighting against the guerillas.95
As soon as the Foreign Legion returned to Algeria from their Mexican campaign the French
government ordered a reduction of strength and by August 1867 the Legion only counted 3000
men. These were scattered among isolated posts in eastern Algeria and used in the old Legion
tradition of building roads and fortifying posts.
One who was eager to get out of Mexico was Theodore du Plessis from Nyon. In January 1865 he
had joined the Legion and been sent directly to Mexico. After the end of the Mexican campaign he
had high expectations of Algeria: „Oh! joie, nous voguions vers cette Algérie de nos rêves, terre
française où la vie serait relativement facile, où tout était à bon marché, et la vision de la patrie
rapprochée, mettait du soleil dans les coeurs.“96
Fighting and life in Mexico must have been very harsh that he praised a country in such a manner
which he had never visited before and counted as part of French soil.
Algeria was still under a primarily military and monarchist administration reflecting an
„aggressive nature of the colonial occupation“.97 Du Plessis describes how in his eyes the
92 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 41, and Bührer: Imperialkriege, p. 374.93 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 41.94 Julien: Histoire de l'Algérie contemporaine. Vol.1, pp. 273-279.95 Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, pp. 42-43.96 du Plessis, Théodore: Souvenirs de mes campagnes à la Légion étrangère. Mexique et Afrique. 1865-1868. Genf1923, p. 188.97 The administration of Algeria from 1830-1914 had two phases. First a primarily military and monarchistadministration from 1830 to 1870, then a civilian, pro-settler administration from 1870 to 1914. See: Steele, Murray:Algeria: Government and Administration. 1830-1914. In: Encyclopedia of African History, Bd. 1. New York 2005, pp.50- 52.
19
government treated the local people: „Le gouvernement trop exclusivement soldatesque était
brutal, trop laissé aux chefs militaire dont la plupart traitaient les Arabes comme des chiens.“98
Unfortunately for him he just arrived in Algeria during a cholera epidemic killing 500 men from
his garrison. The population was terrified, but in his eyes they were doing nothing except yelling
„god is great“. After the disease came the famine of 1867 which depopulated parts of the country.
This famine left the worst pictures in du Plessis's head that he had ever seen: „Les routes, les rues
des villes, jonchées de cadavres de femmes et d'enfants absolument nus, car pour se procurer leur
dernier morceau de pain, ces malheureux vendaient jusqu'à leurs dernières guenilles.“99
Different from his high anticipations of Algeria it did not prove to be a better place for a Swiss
legionnaire than Mexico.
4.3. „Le cafard“ and the daily life in the Legion
After the German-French War 1870/ 1871 and its deployment against the Paris Commune the
Legion changed its recruitment policy. To reduce the large number of Germans it only accepted
Swiss, Alsatians and men from Lorraine until 1880. In 1897 the Legion counted 573 Swiss but it is
possible that a substantial number of them were actually French100.
According to Porch the French Foreign Legion entered its „golden age“ in 1871. It lasted until the
beginning of World War I. As the French instrument of imperialistic warfare the Legion saw
further action in almost every operation to obtain or secure French colonial rule.101
On August 26, 1881 the French government announced that Algeria was to be administered as a
sovereign territory under the control of the Ministry of the Interior. It was declared to be French in
the same way as Normandy, Brittany or the Savoy.102
During this time an unhappy Charles Durval, a licentiate from the canton of Vaud was serving his
time in Sidi-bel-Abbès with the first regiment. Expulsed by his family because he was not willing
to agree to an arranged marriage, he left his home to find work in Paris. Broke and desolate he
decided to join the Legion. For him this action was nothing but a suitable way to commit suicide.
His time as bleu, as the new recruits were called, was very hard. Always being derided because of
his academic degree he finally tried to desert but was captured by a goum, an arabic gendarme who
98 du Plessis: Souvenirs de mes campagnes, p. 191.99 du Plessis: Souvenirs de mes campagnes, p. 193.100 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 183- 184. Frenchmen who had finished military service were allowed tojoin the Legion „à tître étranger“ in 1897.101 Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 34. From 1883 to 1897 conquest of Indochina, 1892 subjugation of Dahomey, 1895conquest of Madagascar.102 Evans: Algeria, p. 19.
20
was rewarded 25 francs per deserter.103 Charles got le cafard104 in Legion slang. Similar to a
depression or a feeling of pointlessness it could originate from physical demands, harsh discipline,
the unfamiliar environment or just boredom. It was compared to a kind of heavy homesickness but
usually passed after a while.105
The usual way of fighting le cafard was spending the pay on alcohol and women. The pay of 35
centimes for five days of sevice was in Durval's eyes very low. With the pay the legionnaires had to
buy consumable supplies so that they could wash and service their equipement. It is notable that in
the seventeen years between Charles Durval's and Heinrich Spinner's service the pay was still the
same.106
Sidi-bel-Abbès offered a lot of other possibilities to spend a soldier's pay. As soon as the
legionnaires had a day's leave used the Avenue de Mascara which was a straight street under big
shady trees to get into the town centre. Durval was not only impressed by the town but also by its
cultural diversity. Like Spinner he was fascinated by all the different people living and working
together. Most of his comrades visited the numerous Jewish and Christian taverns where they could
invest their money in alcohol. The soldiers were able to get a liter of wine for four sous, that is 20
centimes, or a drink called babali, which is described as a sort of absinth made out of figs.107 Even
Durval who had „[...] die instinktive Abneigung des gebildeten Mannes gegen den übermässigen
Alkohol“108 started drinking. He got into fights in the forbidden quarter of the village nègre and
was put into prison. The village nègre could also be called brothel town, where the access was
forbidden until the start of World War I when the Legion opened three supervised brothels in order
to control the contact between locals and legionnaires and to contain the spread of sexually
transmitted diseases.109 Durval took his chance to die in Indochina and he was shipped out to
Tonkin, where he survived with an injury.110
Hans Seiler, who joined the Legion in 1896, gave a description of what life in the second regiment
was like, which was based in Saida. A usual week started on Monday with a marche militaire
followed on Tuesday by an exercise général. Wednesday and Thursday were reserved for
exercices des sections and service de campagne while Friday was devoted to an exercice de la
103 Randin, Léon: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion. Zürich 1910, pp. 188-189.104 Literally „le cafard“ means the cockroach.105 Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 138.106 Randin: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion, p. 145, and Spinner: Algier, Mexiko, Rom, p. 37. For example anAmerican Private or a British soldier was paid about twenty-five cents a day. See: Porch: The French Foreign Legion,p. 188.107 Randin: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion, p. 152.108 Randin: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion, p. 196.109 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 387, and Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 145.110 Randin: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion, pp. 197- 208.
21
compagnie. Saturday was usually the day for cleaning, maintenance and inspection, while on
Sunday the legionnaires had leave. Seiler describes these activities with the boredom of daily
routine. Peeling potatoes is „mehr eine weibliche als eine männliche Arbeit“ while the field duty
exercises were more like a children's birthday party. The only thing he found challenging were the
marches with the twenty kilogram backpack.111 Physical training formed a big share in the life of
the legionnaires. Almost every day they had to do gymnastics, boxing, obstacle courses, bayonet
training or foil fencing, „[...] um die Glieder und Gelenke der Soldaten zu formen und zu
stählen.“112
Seiler was glad that in his garrison the Basler Mission had set up a station where the legionnaire
could relax, read books or newspapers of his home country. The local population did not have a
very good opinion of the legionnaires but this was mutual as Seiler saw it: „Jeder Legionär freut
sich aber riesig, wenn es ihm gelingt, irgend einem Araber ein Schnippchen zu schlagen [...]“.113 A
legionnaire did not pamper an Arab and disregarded European property concepts. Stealing from
Arabs at the market was normal for him. As Arabs often gambled in circles in the streets the
legionnaries would rush up to them and steal their money. The Arabs would only yell insults at the
fleeing soldiers, because they were probably to afraid to chase them.
In order to get rid of the boredom of guard duty and garrison life, Seiler hoped to be chosen for
duty in the French colonies. Unfortunately for him this did not happen because his remaining time
of service was too short. He was assigned to guard duty at a military prison called Ain-el-Hadjar
with inmates mostly of the Oran division. At this point Seiler wanted to clean up the rumour that
the Legion was constantly used as a pool of cheap construction workers. In his view the prisoners
did this kind of work. „[...] sie sind es auch, welche die Arbeiten ausführen, die stets den
Legionären zugeschrieben werden; sie bauen Strassen, Kanäle, Häuser, sie treiben Ackerbau, sie
machen Kies, Schotter, Pflastersteine, kurz alles mögliche.“114
4.4. Moroccon border incidents and interwar period
While France and Germany were in a political dispute over the future of Morocco at the beginning
of the new century, the Legion was guarding the border to its western neighbor in the Sud Oranais.
Morocco itself was in political disarray and nomadic tribes were regularly penetrating into
Algeria. These fast horsemen evaded almost every attempt of capture. Chasing after these bandits
111 Seiler: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion, Nr. 81.112 Seiler: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion, Nr. 152.113 Seiler: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion, Nr. 152.114 Seiler: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion, Nr. 190.
22
proved to be a dilemma for the French cavalry. Either it had to leave the support of the infantry,
thereby risking ambush and attrition or it had to stay with the infantry leaving the initiative to the
enemy. What was missing was an intermediate between cavalry and infantry.115 On the initiative of
Lieutenant Jaeglé from Appenzell, mounted companies would fill the tactical gap. In fact the idea
was not totally new, rather an improvement of Bugeauds idea of the light columns. Francois-Oscar
de Négrier also experimented with mounted forces on mules which accompanied the Chasseurs
d'Afrique. His aim was not necessarily to move faster but further.116
Quicker than normal infantery but not as vulnerable as cavalry the mounted companies were
equipped with mules. Mules were very important in the Säntis region where Lieutenant Jaeglé was
from, because they could carry the heaviest loads under harsh climatic conditions. Jean Moser,
who joined the Legion in the early 1890s was assigned to such a mounted company in the Sud
Oranais. He described the mules as surer-footed than horses and more persistent as well as more
frugal. It took quite a time to learn how to work and ride with these stubborn animals. Per two men
there was one mule which carried the equipment, supplies and also one soldier. Every hour the
order „change of rider“ was given and so one legionnaire could always rest his feet without
slowing down the company. These „centaur-warriors“ could cover a distance up to 150 kilometers
in two days, but that took legionnaires and animals to their limits. In case of an alarm the marchers
were used as skirmishers to scout the area, while during an enemy engagement they formed the
first firing line. The riders left the mules with a small guard and moved up to support the first
line.117
Riding through the extensions of the Sahara, Moser experienced the landscapes of sand dunes and
small hidden paradises, oases, with green date trees where Arabs traded dates and figs not for
money but for tools and other useful equipment. Naturally for him „wurden sie schwer betrogen
oder vielmehr bestohlen.“118 Four months after their arrival in Ain-Sefra Moser left his company
and was made an orderly for a captain who had to draw a construction plan for the train line from
Oran to the oasis of Figuig. This work also involved fighting and chasing bandits who mostly came
from the Moroccon side. That there was no place for mercy is shown by the handling of prisoners
and wounded: „Die Gefangenen wurden auf dem Platze gerichtet, und zwar sofort erschossen,
ebenso die Verwundeten.“119 Those who were „lucky“ enough to be taken back to the Arab
administration building which was also used as prison, could choose to be prosecuted according to
115 Hornung: Die Legion, pp. 181-185, and Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 315.116 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 316-317.117 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, pp. 186-189.118 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, p. 21.119 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, p. 24.
23
Arab or French law. Depending on the crime a hand, an ear or the nose was cut off. When Moser
once passed such a building he saw six ears nailed to the entrace gate. Prisoners were held in holes
shaped like funnels which were covered by an iron plate. „[...] wenn sie Wasser oder zu essen
verlangen, so schüttet man es einfach hinunter in das Loch, wo doch die Leute auch ihre Notdurft
verrichten müssen.”120 He was shocked by this kind of treatment.
As seen with other Swiss legionnaires Mosers colonial view is visible but still rather complex. On
one hand he had pity with the life of the Arabs. The houses built of clay reminded him of holes and
naturally there were no beds. He wondered how the people could bear the cold only with some rags
and barefoot. On the other hand with a mixture of disgust and respect he called the Arabs
“bärenstarke Tagediebe” who rode on their horses while their wives had to walk and carry the
heaviest loads. All in all Moser described the Arabs as: „[...] sehr starke Leute; ihre Arbeit besteht
aber aus nichts anderem als Jagen und Stehlen.”121
Eventually Moser's battalion was ordered to Madagascar. The legionnaires rejoiced upon this news
as well as Moser: „[...] auch ich freute mich ungemein; denn die Reise interessierte mich sehr,
und hauptsächlich lockten uns die fernen Kolonien, von denen uns die älteren Soldaten so manches
Abenteuer erzählten [...].”122
During the interwar period the Legion was still used as a tool of the French colonial imperialism
especially in Morocco.123
Although General Paul Rollet wanted to regroup the Legion in Morocco he later turned Sidi-bel-
Abbès into „the Legion's shrine and holy city“.124 In spite of the focus on Morocco the Legion was
still used in Algeria and contrary to Seiler's account the men were also used as building labourers.
Paul Strupler and his comrades had to continue the work of German prisoners of war. They had to
finish the train line from Tlemcen to Beni-Saf. Strupler assumed that there was a reason why they
had to build the train line: „Wieviel die Militärverwaltung und der Hauptmann an uns verdienten,
wurde uns nicht gesagt; aber jedenfalls war es genügend, sonst hätten sie uns sicher im Jahre
1924, als im Rif Leutemangel herrschte, nach Marokko geschickt.“125 So the Legion was still used
as cheap labour which did not mean that Strupler did not engage in combat. But the worst thing
120 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, p. 26. Already Emil Fischer-Miville described similiar prisons for soldiers andlegionnaires: „Die mit „prison“ bestraften Soldaten wurden in trichterförmige Gruben, Silos genannt, gesperrt,welche feucht und voll Ungeziefer waren. Der Aufenthalt darin war also nichts weniger wie angenehm.“ See:Nordmann: Emil Fischer-Miville, p. 231.121 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, pp. 21-22.122 Moser: In der Fremdenlegion, p. 32.123 Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 35. During World War I France and the Legion could rely on a new wave of Swiss volunteers of about 14'000 men. See: Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 47. 124 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 383. 125 Strupler: Fünf Jahre Fremdenlegion, pp. 154-155.
24
which could happen was to fall in the hands of the rebels alone.
„Wehe Dem, der den Beduinen oder Kabylen in die Hände fällt; unter den grausamsten Martern haucht er seinLeben aus, am grausamsten sind die Weiber, haben wir doch schon Kameraden aufgefunden mitabgeschnittenen Ohren, der Leib aufgeschlitzt, mit Steinen angefüllt und wieder zugenäht; auch werden sienoch entmannt.“126
4.5. Algerian War of Independence
Following the introduction of military law on June 13, 1927, Swiss could be prosecuted if they had
joined foreign service.127
This proved unfortunate for returning Swiss legionnaires but offered a new collection of sources as
the military justice opened and filed cases of every legionnaire that they could fetch. Even if not all
the returners were prosecuted the numbers of convictions can give a rough idea about the total
number. The convictions from 1949 to 1954 ran to about 200 a year. Oertle estimated that with
those not convicted about 300 Swiss joined the Legion every year and that about 2000 Swiss
served the Legion in the 1950s. This made up around 5.88% of a total of around 34'000 men
serving at the beginning of the Algerian War of Independence.128 Maradans data support these
numbers as she assumes that about 6'800 Swiss served from 1942 to 1953. They formed about 5%
of the strength of the Legion during that period.129
The files also offer a better view on motivation and professional background of the volunteers. For
example of 125 analyzed sentences 13% of the men joined because of adventurousness and
romantic enthusiasm. Like Ernst Speck who remembered with a certain nostalgia: „Getreu der
Devise unserer Vorahnen, die im Solde eines Königs von Frankreich oder eines andern
Landesherrn gedient haben , war mir Ehre und Treue ein Begriff.“ 130 So even in the 1950s some
Swiss still liked to see themselves in the old tradition of the Kapitulationen.
After World War II and the defeat in Indochina against the Viet Minh, the Legion had to handle
another insurgency in Algeria against the Front de Libération National (FLN). The growing
Muslim frustration had already been illustrated in the Sétif uprising on May 8, 1945, where the
126 Strupler: Fünf Jahre Fremdenlegion, p. 54.127 Bundeskanzlei: Militärstrafgesetz (MstG). January 1, 2014. Art. 94, sect. 1 states that: 1. Der Schweizer, der ohneErlaubnis des Bundesrates in fremden Militärdienst eintritt, wird mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder Geldstrafebestraft.128 Oertle: Endstation Algerien, p. 107 and Hallo: Monsieur Légionnaire, pp. 168-169. 129 Maradan: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère, p. 72. She estimates that from 1831 to 1942 20'000 Swiss served the Legion, approxomatly 6% of its strength. 130 Keller, Hans: Die Wahrheit über die französische Fremdenlegion. Aarau 1954, p. 52 and Oertle: Endstation Algerien, p. 14. For further reasons see appedix 1.
25
anger against the French rule exploded. 102 Europeans were killed in a brutal manner, but the
French retaliation cost the lives of several thousand Muslims. Martin Evans saw three reasons for
the violence: Algerian nationalism, settlers acting on their own initiative and a French state which
tried to reassert national sovereignty.131 Ultimately the FLN started a new uprising on November 1,
1954 willing to secure independence by the means of armed struggle. France tried to learn from the
Maoist influenced insurgency of the Viet Minh and attempted to apply these lessons against the
FLN by formulating a new doctrine, the guerre révolutionaire, which denoted the insurgency as
well as the counter-insurgency. Analyzing the success of the Viet Minh the French found two
crucial components, guerilla warfare and psychological warfare. The weakness appeared to be the
vulnerability of the insurgents in the initial phase of the conflict, before any deeply rooted support
among the population could be established, and the highly likely dependence on logistic bases in
neighbouring states. Therefore the aim was to separate the population as soon as possible from the
insurgents through resettlement and to secure the borders to prevent the flow of supplies.
Principally the counter-insurgency also involved two possibly overlapping phases, destruction and
construction.132
Stefan Küttel, a Swiss volunteer, quickly noticed the kind of warfare the Legion instructed in basic
training: „Bald schon merkte ich, dass die Kriegsführung, auf die ich nun mit meinen Kameraden
gedrillt wurde, mit dem was ich in meiner Heimat gelernt hatte, nur wenig Ähnlichkeit hatte. Hier
wurde einzig die Guerillabekämpfung geübt.“133
Joining the Legion in 1956, Küttel quickly got a taste of how this war was fought. Rushing to help
an attacked farm of a pied noir, the legionnaires had to discover that they were too late and the
Fellaghas had already disappeared:
„Die Frau des Aufgefundenen wurde unweit dieser Stelle entdeckt. Die Leiche war aufgeschlitzt und daserwartete Baby,[...] lag neben ihr. Zwei Buben, ungefähr vier und sechs Jahre alt, lagen mit durchschnittenerKehle, keine zehn Meter von ihrer Mutter entfernt.”134
In pursuit of the suspects the village nearby was controlled house for house with the help of the
gendarmerie. It was obvious for Küttel that all the young men had already fled the village and left
behind only the women, elderly and children, who were only answering „manharf”- we don't
know, to all the questions asked. As the interrogation turned out to be useless, the gendarmerie
131 Evans: Algeria, pp. 85-92.132 Beckett, Ian F.W.: Modern Insurgencies and Counter-Insurgencies. Guerillas and their opponents since 1750. NewYork 2001, pp. 159-161, and Bührer: Imperialkriege, pp. 465- 470. Important exponents of the guerre révolutionnaire:Paul Aussaresses, Marcel Bigeard, Georges Bonnet, Andrés Souyris, Charles Lacheroy and Jacques Hogard.133 Küttel, Stefan: Auf dem falschen Zug. Im Dienste der französischen Fremdenlegion während des Freiheitskampfes in Algerien. Altdorf 2002, p. 44.134 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 62.
26
started to distribute provisions and the medics to treat the sick, thus executing the phase of
construction.135 From 1955 onwards the Sections Administratives Spécialisées (SAS) and the
Sections Administratives Urbaines (SAU) implemented a number of programmes to improve the
infrastructure and daily life of the civilian Muslim population. Hand in hand with this
psychological campaign went a large-scale resettlement which affected two to three million
civilians. The aim of these Camps de Regroupement were on one side to isolate the local
population from the insurgents, on the other side to offer it a better standard of life. However, due
to poor preparation and lacking of funds the French could not win the trust of a Muslim population
which had been ripped out of its social structures.136
Shortly after Küttel was involved in the phase of destruction and received his baptism of fire. His
battalion swarmed out in order to sweep the hills around Mascara to find and fight Fellaghas who
were hiding on a densely wooded hill. After finally making contact with a group of 30 insurgents,
fierce fighting broke out and under the support of two T-6 air fighters his group had to advance and
encircled the enemy. The planes ensured the end of the battle:
„Nun zogen die Maschinen hintereinander direkt auf den umkämpften Hügel zu. Die erste liess etwas Grosses,Eiförmiges und Glänzendes fallen, bevor sie wieder steil hochzog.[...] keine Explosion war zu vernehmen beimAufschlag dieser Napalmbomben. Lediglich eine Druckwelle war zu verspüren. Gleich darauf legte sich eine infernalische Hitze über den Hügel. Meterhohe Flammen und mächtige Rauchpilze schossen in die Höhe.”137
The result of the attack was that the Fellaghas ran towards the legionnaires either surrendering or
firing until shot dead. The air support was an important factor against the FLN and their military
arm the ALN (Armée de la Libération Nationale), since they did not really possess any anti-aircraft
guns or missiles. It also ensured the mobility of the French forces with the deployment of
helicopters as well as the fast evacuation of wounded.138
Another prominent phase of destruction was the Battle of Algiers where the FLN leadership under
Ramdane Abbane opened a campaign of urban terrorism. Algiers was shaken by regular bombings
and the murder of the mayor of Boufarik, a town 20km south of Algiers. The answer was the
deployment of General Jacques Massu and the 10th Parachute Division which was given extensive
police power. 139
Massu and his men had to anticipate the FLN strategy, to take the lessons learnt in rural guerilla
warfare and to apply them to an urban context. For this Massu employed a system called
135 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 64.136 Bührer: Imperialkriege, p. 472, and Beckett: Modern Insurgencies, p. 164.137 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, pp. 71-72.138 Beckett: Modern Insurgencies, p. 165.139 Evans: Algeria, pp. 189-191, and Horne, Alistair: A Savage War of Peace. Algeria 1954-1962. London 1996,, pp.183- 192.
27
Quadrillage offensif. Algier was divided into squares, each under the control of a regimental
command. The paras set up checkpoints around theses squares to control everyone leaving and
entering.140 With large-scale razzias, mass arrests and interrogations often including torture the FLN
suffered a major deafeat.141But the torture proved to be a two-edged sword, as the usage had an
influence on the reputation of France and the FLN could win international sympathies. From the
environment of urban warfare torture was transported on the battlefield.
After his return to Switzerland the legionnaire K.C. stated in his interrogation report:
„Im Kampf gefangene FLN-Leute wurden auch gefoltert, um Informationen herauszubekommen. SolcheFolterungen fanden auf dem Kampffeld statt. Was später mit diesen Gefangenen geschehen ist, weiss ich nicht.An solchen Folterungen war ich ebenfalls beteiligt gewesen, und zwar gezwungenermassen.”142
He frankly admits that he had also tortured but not on his own initiative, rather presumably by
executing an order, a statement often used to disclaim responsibility. He continues describing the
techniques used: „Man folterte die Leute, indem man sie mit Wasser auffüllte, unter Strom setzte
oder ihnen die Ohren abschnitt. Damit die Gefolterten später nichts aussagen konnten, wurden sie
nachher getötet.”143 Various forms of water torture were used during the war but the favorite form
was the gégéne, electrodes which could be attached to any part of the body, often on genitals.144
That the war was fought with great brutality and even children were not safe of violence was
reported by E.S., a deserted Swiss legionnaire. During a razzia on a village near Batna a radiopost
was found in a house where only an old woman and a ten year old girl were present:
„Aber man musste doch einen Schuldigen haben und so nahm man kurzerhand das 10-jährige Mädchen mitund Kapitän Bollmann befahl mir,... das Kind zu erschiessen. Natürlich zögerte ich, ein solches Verbrechenauszuführen, aber der Kapitän trat mich in den Rücken und drohte mir, wenn ich das Kind nicht erschiessenwerde, dann stelle man mich an die Wand... Ich erschoss darauf das Kind mit einem Kopfschuss, es war soforttot.”145
The question arises, why E.S. would confess to such a crime? Can he be believed? The case forced
the French to intervene. They did not only call the specific crime an invention of E.S. but also
other statements about his career in the Legion. Since he could prove the truth of other incidents
during his time in the Legion the Swiss court believed his side of the story, because it knew that
the French authorities would not offer legal aid or truthful information. From testimonies of other
140 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 583.141 Bührer: Imperialkriege, p. 469.142 Oertle: Endstation Algerien, p. 190. On torture during the Battle of Algiers: Horne: A Savage War of Peace, pp.195-207.143 Oertle: Endstation Algerien, p. 190.144 Horne: A Savage War of Peace, pp. 199- 200.145 Oertle: Endstation Algerien. p. 233.
28
former Swiss legionnaires the court was sure that atrocities were committed in Algeria but found it
highly unfair to call E.S. to account while others were acquitted because they kept their crimes for
themselves. Again a legionnaire passed the responsibility to a superior and tried to claim to have
acted under a direct order. He had every reason to keep this crime a secret but still chose to confess
it.146 So its very possible that his story was true, but it also showed that the French authorities had
no interest in investigating and uncovering a war crime committed during the Algerian War of
Independence.
In the rural areas of Algeria, France enjoyed considerable military success which was achieved by
closing off the Tunisian border with help of the Morice line and thus preventing the flow of ALN
fighters and supplies. An eight-foot electrified fence backed with minefields and 80'000 men had a
reported kill ratio of 85 per cent at the Algerian- Tunisian border by April 1958.147
Stefan Küttel, then Corporal in the 2nd Régiment étrangère de cavalerie (2nd REC) described that
for his unit the time at the Morice Line passed rather slowly so the legionnaires distracted
themselves with alcohol and officers were mostly occupied dissolving brawls. On the other hand
another company of the 2nd REC had to engage small groups of trespassers almost every night.148
After Maurice Challe took over as commander-in-chief in Algeria he applied new tactics. Challe
created the commandos de chasse. Accompanied by harkis149 they had the task to pin down FLN
units. After that Paras and legionnaires were called in transported by helicopters or tanks to
encircle the enemy units. When this was done an artillery or an airstrike was conducted and the
encircling troops would finish the job.150
On March 24, 1959 together with regular units Küttel and his regiment were involved in one of
these „search and destroy“ operations north of the 2nd REC new base in Djelfa. The regular troops
mostly consisted of young French conscripts who were not in Algeria by choice. They looked at
the legionnaires with a certain amount of admiration and thankfulness as the Legion was doing a
lot of the „dirty work“. When Küttel spoke to some artillerists he had the feeling that they were
talking to a supernatural being and that they were honored that he spent time with them.151
Together they encircled the Djebel Zemra, a mountain were FLN units where entrenched and
146 Oertle: Endstation Algerien, pp. 234- 237.147 Horne: A Savage War of Peace, pp. 263- 265, and Beckett: Modern Insurgencies, p. 164. A similiar line was built onthe Moroccan border.148 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 191149 Up to 60'000 harkis, as the local armed auxiliary forces were called, served France in 1958. See: Evans: Algeria, p. 250.150 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, p. 594.151 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 67, and p. 107. Only two percent of the total French soldiers were legionnaires butthe legionnaires formed eight percent of the dead. About 26'500 legionnaires fought in 1956 then the number fell on21'000 legionnaires between the years 1958 and 1961. See Koller: Die Fremdenlegion, p. 37.
29
waiting for the attack. Until nightfall Küttel described fierce fighting again with close air support.
According to Challe's strategy that neither the mountain or the night would be left to the fellaghas
the legionnaires kept the encirclement during the night so nobody could escape. The next day
Küttel reported that they had taken only 20 prisoners and that there were 200 dead fighters.152
Parts of the French officer corps slowly grew unhappy with the politics of Charles de Gaulle
concerning the Algerian question. Finally with the help of the 1st Régiment étranger de
parachutistes (1st REP) and other paratrooper regiments the officers and generals sympathizing
with the pied noir cause tried to overthrow Charles de Gaulle's government on April 22, 1961.
From a legionnaire's point of view Küttel described the situation as follows:
„Zu viel Kompromisse wurden eingegangen. Der bis anhin erbrachte Blutzoll schien vergebens gewesen zusein. Ein unmittelbar bevorstehender Sieg der französischen Armee und der Einheiten der Fremdenlegionwurde gefährdet. An diesem Putsch beteiligten sich, passiv oder aktiv, verschiedene Einheiten.“153
The coup tourned out to be a disaster as the regular conscript army , the navy and even the air force
refused to follow the paras and their officers. Officers who did not go into captivity joined the
Organisation Armée Sécret (OAS) to keep on fighting for an Algérie française. The 1st REP and the
regiments which followed it were dissolved. 154 The regimental command of Küttels 2nd REC was
also relieved because of showing sympathy for the revolutionaries which shows that big parts of
the Legion were not happy with de Gaulle. For Küttel the war ended in protecting oil prospectors
and hunting gazelles. It hurt him as the proud and glorious picture of the French Foreign Legion
crumbled as one officer after another was put on trial. For him a world collapsed and he decided to
desert the Legion. After crossing the border in Basel he drew an ambivalent balance of his time
with the Legion. The Legion offered him a experience which he could never have had elsewhere.
But he also had to pay a high price. He concluded: „Du hast alles verloren, was du noch zu
verlieren hattest. Deine ganze Jugend.“155
152 Evans: Algeria, pp. 189-191, Horne: A Savage War of Peace, p. 245, and Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, pp. 200-203.153 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 220.154 Porch: The French Foreign Legion, pp. 609- 613.155 Küttel: Auf dem falschen Zug, p. 230.
30
5. Conclusion
Since the French Foreign Legion had set foot on Algerian soil, the Swiss had been part of its
history. During the first years the Swiss were prominently represented by a number of officers and
its first commander, Baron Stoffel. The number of the Swiss legionnaires was surprisingly low, if it
is taken into consideration that the Swiss Guards had produced a high number of unemployed
soldiers. Two reasons can be given: The French were not interested in rehiring the just discharged
and unpopular soldiers of the foreign regiments as the Legion was thought of as an outlet to fight
the refugees and deserters streaming to France from all over Europe. It can also be assumed that a
part of Swiss were either counted as Germans or joined the Legion pretending to be Germans. With
the forming of the second Légion étrangère a short revival of the Kapitulationen took place which
ended with the transformation into the 1er Régiment étranger and the deployment to Algeria. As
part of the Legion Swiss legionnaires were involved in forming the country for colonization and
also protecting it. Nonetheless they had to go through the same hardships as the other legionnaires.
Through the history of the Legion up to 1962 the Swiss legionnaires accepted the French claim for
Algeria without questioning it. They did not mention or discuss the claims of the indigenous tribes
although du Plessis noticed that they were treated like dogs. But this was rather a description of
their status than an expression of pity. The reason for that seems to lie in the picture which they had
of the inhabitants of Algeria which proved ambivalent. The Swiss legionnaires considered
themselves superior while considering the native population as savages or bandits. They did not
offer them the same property claims as for Europeans as they regularly tried to steal from or cheat
the locals. But they still considered them as strong and frugal thus offering them a certain amount
of respect and admiration.
For those Swiss with a desire of experiencing adventure and exotic countries, Algeria did not
suffice and most dreamt with pleasant anticipation of being deployed to a more „exotic” colony.
The brutality which runs like a red line through the stories the Swiss legionnaires described in
Algeria is striking. Numerous atrocities were perfomed by both sides from shooting prisoners and
civilians to torturing. The accounts show how brutally the colonization and occupation of Algeria
was conducted and that the Swiss legionnaires were also involved.
Conducting war in Algeria was very challenging throughout the years of French presence.
Conventional warfare moved to the backround and adaptation to counterinsurgency became vital
for the French to keep control in Algeria. More flexibility and mobility were crucial in this kind of
warfare and were achieved either by adapting to enemy tactics or by technological improvements.
The razzia was kept as an instrument of fighting insurgency and was taken with adjustments into
31
an urban environment during the Battle of Algiers. The reliance on native troops had always been
another instrument of fighting insurgency as we have seen with the Zouaves, the Turcos and the
Harkis.
Küttel is a good example in what kind of dilemma the Swiss legionnaires were stuck at the end of
the Algerian War of Independence. Loyal to their officers and failing to see why a successful army
should give up certain victory the Swiss legionnaires were left with the shattered remains of a once
glorious Legion. This was reason enough for Küttel to desert.
As the presented documents of the Swiss legionnaires represent only a selection of available
material there is still space for a further examination of the life of Swiss legionnaires in Algeria.
The accounts of Swiss legionnaires also offer the possibility to throw a light on other times and
areas of French history apart from Algeria.
32
6. Appendix
6.1. Tables
Reason for entry Quantity in %
1. Different offences, for example burglary, robbery, fraud, counterfeit, defalcation,bilking, act of indecency etc.
63 50
2. Poverty, hard and joyless youth, love conflicts. 22 17
3. Adventroussnes, romantic enthusiasm. 16 13
4. Miscellaneous, no obvious reasons. 11 10
5. Unemployment, low income. 5 4
6. Marriage problems. 4 3
7. Conflict with parents. 4 3
Total 125 100
Profession Quantity in %
1. Without profession (henchman, unskilled laborer, runner). 73 59
2. Industrial professions. 23 19
3. Apprentices. 14 11
4. Commercial professions. 7 5
5. Miscellaneous (bartender, nurse, farm laborer). 7 5
6. Students 1 1
Total 125 100
Both tables from: Keller, Hans: Die Wahrheit über die französische Fremdenlegion. Aarau 1954, pp. 52-54.
6.2. Photos
33
Sidi-bel-Abbès in the 1950s
34
Stefan Küttel in Djelfa Heinrich Spinner
Emil Fischer-Miville
Bombardement of the Djebel Bou-Kahil
7. Selected Bibliography
7.1. Books
- Azan, Paul: Par l'épée et par la charrue. Ecrits et discours du Général Bugeaud. Paris 1948.
- Bodin, Jérôme: Les Suisses aus service de la France. De Louis XI à la Légion étrangère. Paris
1988.
- Boyd, Douglas: Die französische Fremdenlegion. Hamburg 2009.
- Bührer, Tanja (Hrsg.): Imperialkriege von 1500 bis heute. Strukturen-Akteure-Lernprozesse.
Paderborn 2011.
- de Vallière, Paul: Treue und Ehre. Geschichte der Schweizer in Fremden Diensten. Lausanne
1940.
- du Plessis, Théodore: Souvenirs de mes campagnes à la Légion étrangère. Mexique et Afrique,
1865-1868. Genf 1923.
- Evans, Martin: Algeria. France's Undeclared War. New York 2012.
- Führer, Hans Rudolf / Eyer, Robert-Peter: Schweizer in "Fremden Diensten". Verherrlicht und
verurteilt. Zürich 2006.
- Hallo, Jean Paul: Monsieur Légionnaire. L'homme et ses tradition. Paris 1994.
- Hochheimer, Albert: Verraten und verkauft. Die Geschichte der europäischen Söldner. Stuttgart
1967.
- Horne, Alistair: A Savage War of Peace. Algeria 1954-1962. London 1996.
- Hornung, Peter: Die Legion. Europas letzte Söldner. München 1989.
- Julien, Charles-André; Ageron, Charles-Robert: Histoire de l'Algérie contemporaine. Vol.1. La
conquête et les débuts de la colonisation (1827-1871). Paris 1979.
- Keller, Hans: Die Wahrheit über die französische Fremdenlegion. Aarau 1954.
- Koller, Christian: Die Fremdenlegion. Kolonialismus, Söldnertum, Gewalt. Paderborn 2013.
- Küttel, Stefan: Auf dem falschen Zug. Im Dienste der französischen Fremdenlegion während des
Freiheitskampfes in Algerien. Altdorf 2002.
- Lordick, Volker: Unter der Sonne Nordafrikas. Legionär in Algerien. Stuttgart 2012.
- Maradan, Eveline: Les Suisses et la Légion étrangère de 1831 à 1861. Fribourg 1987.
- Montagnon, Pierre: Histoire de la Légion. De 1831 à nos jours. Paris 2012.
- Moser, Jean: In der Fremdenlegion. Erlebnisse in der Wüste Sahara und auf Madagskar. Bern
1911.
35
- Nordmann, Theodor: Emil Fischer-Miville als Unteroffizier in der französischen Fremdenlegion.
(1855-1858). Basel 1931.
- Oertle, Vincenz: Endstation Algerien. Schweizer Fremdenlegionäre. Dreizehn Lebensbilder der
1950er Jahre. Appenzell 2007.
- Porch, Douglas: The French Foreign Legion. A Complete History. New York 2010.
- Randin, Léon: Ein Schweizer in der Fremdenlegion. Zürich 1910.
- Sessions, Jennifer E.: By sword and plow. France and the conquest of Algeria. Ithaca 2013.
- Spinner, Heinrich: Algier, Mexiko, Rom. Schicksale eines Schweizers in fremden Kriegsdiensten.
Zürich 1901.
- Strupler, Paul: Fünf Jahre Fremdenlegion. Frauenfeld 1928.
7.2. Articles and encyclopedias
- Czouz-Tornare, Alain-Jacques: „Reisläufer.“ In: Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz s. v., e-HLS,
access January 10, 2014 (Printversion: Basel 2011).
- Frémeaux, Jacques: The French Experience in Algeria: Doctrine, Violence
and Lessons Learnt. In: Civil Wars. 14:1 (2012), S. 49-62.
- Henry, Philippe: „ Fremde Dienste.“ In: Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz s. v., e-HLS, access
January 10, 2014 (Printversion: Basel 2005).
- Henry, Philippe: „Schweizergarden.“ In In Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz s.v., e-HLS, access
4. July 2013 (Printversion: Basel 2012).
- Seiler, Hans: Fünf Jahre in der französischen Fremdenlegion. Aus meinen Tagebuchblättern.
Printed in: Neue Zürcher Zeitung Jg: 1914, Nr. 13, 45, 81, 117, 152, 190.
- Steele, Murray: Algeria: Government and Administration. 1830-1914. In: Encyclopedia of
African History, Bd. 1. New York 2005, S. 50- 52.
- Bundeskanzlei: Militärstrafgesetz (MstG), January 1, 2014. Art. 94.
7.3. Photos and Pictures
- Sidi-bel-Abbès in the 1950s: Oertle, Vincenz: Endstation Algerien. Schweizer Fremdenlegionäre.
Dreizehn Lebensbilder der 1950er Jahre. Appenzell 2007, p. 267.
- Stefan Küttel in Djelfa: Küttel, Stefan: Auf dem falschen Zug. Im Dienste der französischen
Fremdenlegion während des Freiheitskampfes in Algerien. Altdorf 2002, p. 166.
- Heinrich Spinner: Spinner, Heinrich: Algier, Mexiko, Rom. Schicksale eines Schweizers in
36
fremden Kriegsdiensten. Zürich 1901, backside of the book cover.
- Emil Fischer-Miville: Nordmann, Theodor: Emil Fischer-Miville als Unteroffizier in der
französischen Fremdenlegion. (1855-1858). Basel 1931, extra page between p. 210 and p. 211.
- Bombardement of the Djebel Bou-Kahil: Küttel, Stefan: Auf dem falschen Zug. Im Dienste der
französischen Fremdenlegion während des Freiheitskampfes in Algerien. Altdorf 2002, p. 162.
- Frontpage: top: https://plus.google.com/117611090721430985028/posts and access January 18,
2014; bottom: Prise d'armes with Stefan Küttel (left). Küttel, Stefan: Auf dem falschen Zug. Im
Dienste der französischen Fremdenlegion während des Freiheitskampfes in Algerien. Altdorf 2002,
p. 164.
37