Sri B Athaulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 May, 2017

Karnataka High CourtSri B Athaulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 May, 2017Author: Aravind Kumar 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MAY, 2017

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

W.P.NOS.49713-49720/2015

C/W

W.P.NOS.27986-27990/2012 & 27991-993/2012, 33818- 33822/2015 & 33823-825/2015 & 34039/2015,33837/2015, 34265-34279/2015, 34522-34533/2015,34666-34670/2015 & 34672-676/2015, 34728/2015 &35649/2015, 34831-34835/2015, 35014-35026/2015, 35822-35825/2015, 35869-35871/2015, 36177- 36181/2015 & 36182-184/2015, 36186-36189/2015,36225/2015, 36226-36227/2015, 36383/2015, 36511-36515/2015 & 36516/2015, 36528-36533/2015, 36667- 36671/2015 & 36672-676/2015, 36683-36684/2015, 36685-36688/2015, 36770-36774/2015 & 36776- 780/2015, 36793/2015, 36795/2015, 37015-37019/2015 & 37020-37021/2015, 37026-37035/2015, 37055-37079/2015, 37080-37084/2015 & 37085- 89/2015, 37255-37259/2015 & 37260-261/2015, 37263-37267/2015 & 37268-270/2015, 37419- 37423/2015 & 37424-427/2015 & 37583-592/2015, 37428/2015, 37429/2015, 37431-37436/2015, 2

37440/2015, 37445/2015, 37447/2015, 37451/2015, 37455/2015, 37456/2015, 37551-37552/2015 & 37725/2015, 37577/2015, 37578/2015, 37664/2015,37711-37713/2015, 37714-37715/2015, 37746/2015,37747/2015 & 37945/2015, 37931/2015, 37932/2015,37976/2015, 38042-38044/2015, 38051-38052/2015,38053/2015, 38054-38057/2015, 38247-38259/2015, 38260-38264/2015 & 38265-269/2015, 38270-38271/2015, 38272-38273/2015, 38341-38352/2015,38354/2015, 38360-38362/2015, 38386/2015, 38478-38502/2015, 38528-38530/2015, 38546-38548/2015, 38790-38808/2015, 38809-38812/2015, 38813-38815/2015, 38836-38837/2015, 38899/2015 & 38900-38901/2015 & 38952-38953/2015, 38903/2015, 38904-

Sri B Athaulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 May, 2017

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/62564772/ 1

38923/2015, 38924-38925/2015 38927-38949/2015 & 38950-51/2015 & 42696- 706/2015, 38984-38986/2015, 39131-39142/2015, 39232-39238/2015, 39343-39347/2015 & 39348- 351/2015, 39354-39358/2015 & 39359-363/2015, 39364-39368/2015 & 39369-373/2015, 39639-39642/2015, 39643/2015, 39842-39843/2015, 39844-39848/2015, 40107-40123/2015, 40124-40130/2015, 40148-40152/2015 & 40153-154/2015, 40155-40167/2015, 40213/2015, 40265-40269/2015, 40270-40274/2015 & 40275-40279/2015, 40281-40339/2015, 40340-40354/2015, 40355-40365/2015 & 40572- 3

40576/2015 & 40577-40581/2015, 40367-40368/2015, 40369-40371/2015, 40417-40431/2015, 40496-40500/2015, 40904-40918/2015, 40954-40955/2015, 40956-40976/2015, 41016-41017/2015, 41055-41080/2015, 41082/2015, 41115-41117/2015, 41138- 41139/2015, 41141/2015, 41233/2015, 41330-41340/2015, 41482-41505/2015, 41523-41524/2015,41614/2015, 41615-41617/2015, 41856-41860/2015 & 42035-42039/2015 & 42040-42042/2015 & 42043-42047/2015, 41876-41888/2015, 41893/2015, 41894-41898/2015, 42398-42399/2015, 42517-42521/2015 & 42522-524/2015, 42625-42629/2015 & 43118-119/2015 & 43122/2015, 42719-42723/2015 & 42724- 728/2015, 42794-42815/2015, 42901-42902/2015,42999-43009/2015, 43107-43111/2015 & 43112/2015,43178-43179/2015, 43219-43223/2015 & 43224/2015,43467-43469/2015 & 45171/2015, 43607-43608/2015,43846-43850/2015 & 43851/2015, 43909-43916/2015,43924-43926/2015, 44539-44543/2015 & 44544/2015, 44566-44570/2015, 45088-45092/2015, 45550- 45554/2015 & 45555/2015, 45753/2015, 45902-45904/2015, 45975-45977/2015, 47006-47009/2015,47253-47254/2015, 47369-47371/2015, 47464/2015,47606-47607/2015, 47608/2015, 49463-49464/2015, 49743-49747/2015 & 49748-751/2015, 50170-50173/2015, 50411/2015, 50457-50458/2015, 50460- 4

50472/2015, 50531/2015, 50534-50535/2015, 51742/2015, 52182-52183/2015, 52787/2015 & 52788-791/2015 & 52792-794/2015, 52922-52924/2015, 53163-53165/2015, 53204- 53207/2015 & 54555-561/2015, 54233/2015, 54756-54759/2015, 54761-54765/2015 & 54766-54767/2015, 54879-54881/2015, 56055-56059/2015 & 56060-



64/2015, 56885/2015, 57343-57347/2015 & 57348- 349/2015, 57481-57491/2015, 57492-57494/2015, 59372/2015, 59773/2015, 119-122/2016, 325- 327/2016, 922-923/2016, 1671-1675/2016 & 1676-1677/2016, 1916-1917/2016, 2145/2016, 2204/2016 & 2205-08/2016 & 2209/2016, 2211/2016, 3064/2016, 3413/2016, 3629-3633/2016 & 3634-3635/2016, 5302/2016, 6193-6194/2016, 7250-7260/2016,7435/2016, 7532/2016, 7616-7617/2016, 9047/2016,9077/2016, 9145/2016, 9254-9255/2016, 9342/2016,9357-9359/2016, 9943-9947/2016 & 9950-9952/2016, 9969/2016, 9970-9971/2016, 19590-19591/2016, 30412-30448/2016, 33024/2016, 35351/2016, 37273/2016, 30637-30644/2016 & 30647-651/2016,8606/2017, 117-118/2016, 74-75/2015, 28047/2015, 28807/2015, 28887/2015, 29614-29615/2015,32417/2015, 32501/2015, 33150/2015, 33151/2015,33262-33263/2015, 33268-33269/2015, 33270/2015,33271-33272/2015, 33834-33835/2015, 33836/2015, 5

46698/2015, 52472-52473/2015, 54805-54808/2015, 59047/2015 & 378/2016, 123/2016, 191/2016, 2704- 2705/2016, 2804-2805/2016, 2806-2807/2016, 3807- 3808/2016, 3830-3831/2016, 4210/2016, 4284/2016, 5451-5455/2016, 5516/2016, 5518/2016, 5593- 5594/2016, 6195/2016, 6486/2016, 6765/20166766/2016, 6769/2016 & 7341-7342/2016, 6773/2016, 8241-8244/2016, 8415/2016, 8514-8515/2016, 8990/2016, 9231-9235/2016, 9285-9286/2016, 9305- 9308/2016, 9603-9604/2016, 9662-9663/2016, 9727- 9728/2016, 9741/2016, 9912/2016, 10252- 10253/2016, 10254/2016, 10256/2016, 10267/2016, 10429/2016, 10442/2016, 10701/2016, 10813- 10814/2016, 13201/2016, 19432-19435/2016, 22654- 22661/2016, 23186/2016, 24721-24722/2016, 25489/2016, 26615/2016, 28647-28648/2016, 28649- 28653/2016 & 28654-55/2016, 29681/2016, 30450/2016, 58692/2016, 18565-566/2016

WP Nos. 49713-49720/2015

BETWEEN:

1. SRI B ATHAULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, N.T.R.ASSOCIATES, NO.13/11 P.M.K ROAD, SHANKARPURA, BENGALURU-560004. 6



2. SRI K P VENUGOPAL S/O.K.C.PUTTVEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROP. MAHADESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, KIRUGAVALU, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571424.

3. SRI AYUB KHAN S/O ABDUL SALAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, KUTHAGAHATHA VILLAGE, SHIVANGANGA POST, NELAMANGALA, BENGLURU RURAL DISTRICT. PIN-562 123.

4. SMT MARIYAMMA W/O LATE M.S.MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, MATHA VILLAGE, ATHIMGERE POST, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561201, (REPRESENTING BY M.SIDDRAJEGOWDA) S/O SMT.MARIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER.

5. SRI RAMATHULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROP. RAMATHULLA KHAN ASSOCIATE, NO.13/11, P.M.K.ROAD, SHANKARPURA, BANGALORE-560004.

6. SRI SAYEED AHMED S/O S.NAZEER AHMED, 7

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, HAVELI MOHALLA, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101.

7. SRI MADHUSUDANA S/O GOPAL RAO. B.R. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,



NO.7, BOMMAVARA VILLAGE, UGANAVADI POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

8. SRI SRINIVAS MURTHY S/O HANUMADASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, VISANI ROAD WARD, NO.1, KALYA GATE, MAGADI TOWN, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-51201. ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SIDDANANJAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGLAORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATH RAJ (HEARING AUTHORITY), M.S.BUILDING, 8

AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BEGNALURU-560001.

3. KARNATAKA STAE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027, REP:BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALURU RURAL BY ITS SECRETARY, BDA COMPOLEX, KORMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT



AUTHORITY MYSURU BY ITS SECRETARY RTO OFFICE, MYSURU DISTRICT-570005.

6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGAR BY ITS SECRETARY, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-56259.

7. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR BY ITS SECRETARY, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101.

8. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR BY ITS SECRETARY, 9

KOLAR DISTRICT-563101. ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. ADITYA SONDHI, ADDL.A.G. ALONG WITH SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, 2, 4-8;SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF R-1DTD:5.8.2015 AT ANNEXURE-B.

WP NOS. 27986-27990/2012 & W.P.NOS.27991- 27993/2012 BETWEEN

1. SRI. P T VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SRI P G THYAGARAJAN NO.12/11, 4THMAIN MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION BANGALORE .

2. SRI A VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.12/11, 4TH MAIN MADIWALA NEWEXTENSION BANGALORE.

3. SMT LAKSHMI DEVI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS W/O SRI UMAPATHI NO.12/11, 4TH MAIN,MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION BANGALORE.

4. SMT SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS W/O LATE SRI RAJASHEKAR NO.230, SECONDCROSS, SECOND STAGE, 7TH BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI BANGALORE.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL B D A COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BANGALORE- 560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BANGALORE -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. MR ARIFULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MR A BARIKULLAH KHANNO.21/4, TSP ROAD, KALASIPALAYAM BANGALORE- 560002.

.. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA SONDHI, AAG A/W SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1; SRI.HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI C.V. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESEWRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAPRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL IN REVISION PETITIONS NO.314 TO 316 & 320/07 & 362 TO 365/07 DT.26.2.10,MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-E BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

WP NOS. 33818-822/2015 & W.P.NOS.33823-825/2015 & W.P.NO.34039/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI G C SHIVAMURTHY S/O SRI R K CHENNABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARSKODIRANGAVVANAHALLI BARAMASAGARA POST CHITRADURGA DISTRICT PIN - 577501

2. SRI M R SATHISH S/O SRI M C RENUKAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AMARESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE HOLALKERE ROAD CHITRADURGA - 577501

3. SRI SATHISH S/O SRI LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S P MOTOR SERVICE MANDYA -571401

4. SRI G V SATHISH REDDY S/O SRI G T VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARSNO 11/12, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD KALASIPALAYAM BENGALURU - 560002

5. SMT. N ROOPASHREE W/O SRI P SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS NO 369/C, 5THCROSS LAKSHMI ROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU - 560027

6. SRI G V CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SRI G T VENKATASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARSVINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE NO 11/12, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD KALASIPALYAM BENGALURU- 560002

7. SRI J V SHIVA GANESH S/O SRI J VENKATACHALAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARSPROPRIETOR BAMBOO BAZAAR BALAJI MOTOR SERVICE CHINTAMANI - 563125

8. MS. AZEEMUNNISSA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS AND HER SON MR NADEEB AHMEDAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS WIFE AND SON LATE MR NISSAR AHMED JOINT OWNERS S K STRAVELS, NO 502, 6TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560095 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B R SUNDARA RAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORYED BUILDINGS DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI



BENGALURU - 560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BENGALURU METROPLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION(BMTC), KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-27.

4. NORTH EAST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE DOUBLEROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

SRI S PRAKASH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIMORDER TO STAY OF THE GOVT. ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D PENDING DISPOSAL OFTHE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.

WP NO.33837/ 2015 BETWEEN:

MR ABDUL JAVED S/O MR.ABDUL WAHID AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.479, MOSQUESTREET, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURUR-560 068 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.BR SUNDARA RAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HUNUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECOTR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.NO.536 OF 2012DTD.18.4.2015 VIDE ANNEX-C.

WP NOS. 34265-34279/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. R.V. SUBHASHCHANDRA BOSE S/O VENKATESHCHETTY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S VS MOTORS, GANDHI NAGAR KOLAR, PIN- 563 101.



2. SRI R V BALAJI S/O VENKATESHCHETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S V S MOTORS GANDHINAGAR KOLAR, PIN- 563 101.

3. SMT KALIVANI AMMAR W/O A M MUNIRATHNAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS SRI BHARATHIBUS SERVICE GANDHI NAGAR, KOLAR, PIN -563 101.

4. SRI JAGADISHREDDY S/O T N RAMALINGAREDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PROPR.MADANAPALLI MOTORS MADANAPALLI CHITTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE PIN-517 325.

5. SMT J C UMAREDDY W/O J C PRABHAKARREDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.15/311,SANJEEVNAGAR TADAPATRI, A.P.STATE ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560 001

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY / ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGE M S BUILDING BENGALURU -560 001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGBENGALURU- 560 001

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE METROPLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATIONK.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI HARISH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYTHE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DT.5.8.2015 AS PERANNX-F.

WP NOS. 34522-34533/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. K.R. SANJAY S/O SRI K P RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PROPRIETORRAJKUMAR MOTOR SERVICE NO.140, M B C ROAD, CHIKKBALLAPURA-562 101.

2. MS. NAUSHEEN NAZ W/O MR. B A MUSHEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, V MMOTORS, NO.179, UDHANI LAYOUT, CAMBRIDGE ROAD, ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 008.



3. SRI V GEETHESH S/O SRI A V C VEERABADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562135.

4. SRI B CHOKKA REDDY, MAJOR BY AGE, PROPRIETOR, VEERANJANEYA ENTERPRISES,CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, PIN:563 125.

5. SRI G V PALAKSHA MAJOR BY AGE, PROPRIETOR, VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE, ALBERTVICTOR ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560 002.

6. SRI G V NAGARAJA REDDY, S/O SRI G T VENKATASWAMY REDDY, MAJOR BY AGE,PROPRIETOR, VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE, NO.11/12, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD,KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560 002.

7. MR. K MUBARAK BASHA, MAJOR BY AGE, NO.26, 11TH CORSS, SOMESHWARA NAGAR,JAYANAGAR, I BLOCK, BENGALURU.

8. SRI C ANANTHASHANKAR MAJOR BY AGE, MANAGING PARTNER, S K M S TRAVELS ,ANEKAL, BENGALURU DISTRICT, PIN:562 106.

9. SRI A M MUNIRATHNAM MUDALIAR S/O SRI A MUDALIANDA MUDALIAR, BHARATHIMOTOR SERVICE, NO.1008, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU -560 010.

10. MR MOHAMMED TIPPU QURESHI S/O LATE MR. T MOHAMMED ISQ KURESHI, MAJORBY AGE, SHAHEEN EXPRESS, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, KOLAR-563 101.

11. SRI D M SHIVA PRASAD S/O SRI E MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,KALPAVRUKSHA TRAVELS, CHELUR ROAD, CHINTAMANI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT,PIN:563 125.

12. SRI N SREENIVASA NAIDU, S/O SRI NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU, MAJOR BY AGE,ANNAPOORNESHWARI NILAYA, ANJANI EXTENSION, CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURADISTRICT, PIN:563 125.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORYED BUILDINGS DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU - 560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR



3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BENGALURU METROPLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION(BMTC), KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-27.

4. NORTH EAST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE DOUBLEROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027.


SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

SRI S PRAKASH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 MARKED UNDER ANNX-DAND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 34666-34670/2015 & 34672-676/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI VENKATESWARA TRANSPORT NO.13/286, AVENUE ROAD, MADANAPALLI, ANDHRAPRADESH STATE PIN-517325 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.NAVAZ BASHA, AGE 42YEARS, S/O LATE M.AKBAR SAHEB

2. VENSON TRANSPORTS PVT. LTD.

NO.25/197, REDDYGUNTA CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE PIN-517001 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR, S.GUNASHEKAR S/O LATE V.SRINIVASAN, AGE 45 YEARS

3. SAMIULLA S/O M.ABDUL KADHAR, AGE 68 YEARS, M.B.S.EXPRESS, PADMAGHATTAPOST, MULUBAGAL TALUK KOLAR, PIN-563101

4. D.V.CHANDRASHEKAR S/O VENKATARAMANAIAH, AGE 60 YEARS, NO.1038, NEWEXTENSION KOLAR PIN-563101

5. M/S SIRADI SAI ENTERPRISES D.NO11/1/68, ARVIND NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, ANANTHPUR,ANDHRA PRADESH STATE REPTD., BY SUNKU RAJESH KUMAR

6. Y.REDDY BHASKAR GUPTA S/O Y.RATHNAM SETTY, AGE 48 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,BYRIGANAHALLI POST, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT PIN-563135

7. N.RAMESHKUMAR S/O N.RAMEGOWDA AGE 55 YEARS, VENKATESWARA TALIKIESKOLAR, PIN-563101

8. SMT. N.ARUNA W/O N. RAMESHKUMAR, AGE 48 YEARS, VENKATESWARA TALIKIESKOLAR, PIN-563 101



9. ABDUL SARDAR S/O IBRAHIM SABEB, AGE 68 YEARS, M.B.S. EXPRESS, PADMAGHATTAPOST, MULUBAGAL TALUK KOLAR-PIN-563101

10. NISAR AHMED S/O MUSA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, GOWRIPET, KOLARPIN-563101 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAY SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TOR3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-F.

WP NO. 34728/2015 & W.P.NO.35649/2015 BETWEEN:

B S U KASHI VISHWANATH S/O.SRI SRIKANTAIAH B, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.17-3-20,PENUKONDA ROAD, HINDUPUR, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIKANTH A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.SINDIRESH, AGA FOR R1) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO RE-CONSIDER THEMATTER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AFTER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANDPERMITTED TO OPERATE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONER TILL CONSIDERATION BYTHE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA.

WP NOS. 34831-34835/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SRI. KUMARASWAMY MUDALIYAR S/O KUPPUSWAMY MUDALIYAR, AGED ABOUT 52YEARS, PROP:VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE, THYAMAGONDLU, NELAMANGALA TALUKBANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

2. SRI.UDAY KUMAR S/O KUPPUSWAMY MUDALIYAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,PROP:VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE, THYAMAGONDLU, NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORERURAL DISTRICT.

3. SRI.K.P.RAMACHANDRAIAH S/O LATE PUTTARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, KOLALA, KORATAGERE TUMKUR DISTRICT

4. SRI.R PARI S/O M.RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PROP: VIJAYALAKSHMIMOTORS, CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE STREET, TUMKUR-572 101.

5. SR.S.GNANENDRA S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.192, TANK BUND ROAD,INDIRANAGAR, ITTIGEGUD, MYSORE-570 010 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARAKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD:5.8.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-D.

WP NOS. 35014-35026/2015 BETWEEN:

1. MR LIYAKATH ALI KHAN S/O.S.K.KHAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT. NO.26, 11THCROSS, SOMESHWARANAGAR, JAYAANGAR, I BLOCK, BANGALORE-560011.

2. SRI N JAGADEESH S/O.NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 32 YARS, R/AT. NO.26, 11TH CROSS,SOMESHWARANAGAR, JAYAANGAR, I BLOCK, BANGALORE-560011.



3. SMT R SUMATHI W/O.N.RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 48 YARS, NO.20/1, SWAMY COMPLEX,A.V.ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

4. SRI S KUMARVEL S/O.SENGUTTAN VALLIAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SRIDEVI BUSSERVICE, NO.270/3, BEGUR HOUSING BOARD, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560068.

5. SMT C FAZILATH W/O.LATE.CHAND BASHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO.17/62, 4TH "A"CROSS, LALGINAGAR, LAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU.

6. SRI D MANOGARAN S/O.DORESWAMY, AGED 56 YEARS, NO.18/3, MARIYAMMA KOILSTREET, JAI BHARATHNAGAR, BENGALURU-560033.

7. SRI S C SREENIVASA S/O. S. CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARRS, NO.23,SREE GANESH, 17TH MAIN, BTM II STAGE, N.S.PALYA, BENGALURU-560076.

8. SRI S PRADEEP S/O.K.SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.23, SREEGANESH,17TH MAIN, BTM II STAGE, N.S.PALYA, BENGALURU-560076.

9. SRI H N HANUME GOWDA S/O.H.C.NARAYANAPPA, AGED 56 YEARS, NO.18, 18TH CROSS,7TH MAIN, N S PALYA, BTM II STAGE, BENGALURU-560076.

10. SMT SUMATHY VENKATESAN W/O.SRI.S.C VENKATESAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,NO.4/289, SIPCOT HOUSING COLONY, MOOKANDAPALLI POST, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRIDISTRICT, TAMILNADU-635126.

11. SRI VIGNESH CHELLAPPAN V S/O.S.C. VENKATESAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, NO.4/289,SIPCOT HOUSING COLONY, MOOKANDAPALLI POST, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT,TAMILNADU-635126.

12. SRI K PRASHANTH S/O.KODANDARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.B-49, A VROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

13. SMT PUSHPA REDDY S/O.KODANDARAMA REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.B-49, AV ROAD,KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C V KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.



3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, REP:BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER OF THE R-1 DTD:5.08.2015 (ANNEXURE-D).

WP NOS. 35822-35825/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI D M SHIVA PRASAD S/O SRI.D.S.MALLIKARJUNAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,KALPAVRUKSHA TRAVELS, CHELUR ROAD, CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICTPIN:563 125

2. MR.ABDUL MAJEED S/O MR.D.ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, O.P.O. ROAD,HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN: 562 114 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M ENAGESH AND SRI B. R.SUNDARARAJ GUPTA, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4. SRI.V.GOPI S/O SRI. J.VENKATACHALAMAIAH, BALAJI TRANSPORTS, BAMBOO BAZAAR,CHINTAMANI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN: 563 125

5. SMT. R.MEGHANA W/O SRI.J.SHIVA GANESH, PROPRIETRIX, BALAJI TRANSPORTS,NO.1903, MYSURU ROAD, N.T.PET, BENGALURU-560 032 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE R3;

R4 & R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-H AND THEORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INREVISION PETITIONS NO. 711 OF 2012 AND 1471 OF 2012 DATED 26.11.2014 VIDE ANN-C ANDTHE ORDER PASSED ON 6.8.2015 IN MISC. PETITIONS NO. 36 AND 37 OF 2015 VIDE ANN-E



AND F AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS.

WP NOS. 35869-35871/2015 BETWEEN:

1. MR.MOINUDDIN S/O MR.SHABBIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.14/1, SECONDCROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN, SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027

2. MS.ZEENATH KAUSER W/O MR.SHABBIR AHMED, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.14/1,SECOND CROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN, SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT ANINTERIM ORDER TO STAY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-N ANDPERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO OPERATE THE SERVICES.

WP NOS. 36177-36181/2015 & 36182-184/2015 BETWEEN:

1. MR ABDUL MAJEED S/O MR ABDUL KHADER AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OLD POST OFFICEROAD HOSAKOTE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN : 562114

2. MS MAIMUNNISA D/O MR ABDUL AZEER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S K S TRAVELS, OLDPOST OFFICE ROAD, HOSAKOTE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN : 562114 . . .PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARA RAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, B D A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY



3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

4. MS REHANA BEGUM W/O MR SHAIK SHAFIULLA MAJOR BY AGE NO.33, SECOND MAINSHAMPUR MAIN ROAD NEXT TO ASHRAFIA MOSQUE R T NAGAR BENGALURU-560032 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI HARISH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

SRI A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT ANINTERIM ORDER TO STAY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-O ANDPERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO OPERATE THE SERVICES PENDING DISPOSAL OF THEABOVE WRIT PETITION.

WP NOS. 36186-36189/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI. SAMPANGIRAMAIAH K.C. S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT KOPPA VILLAGE,HULIMANGALA POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 105.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI LOKESH R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

4. SRI.V.RAVICHANDRA S/O FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGEDMAJOR, NO.42/2, 8TH CROSS, WAILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

SRI C.V. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS OFTHE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D TO THEABOVE W.P.



WP NO.36225/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI. ANNAYAPPA S/O LATE SEENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, VINAYAKA MOTORSERVICE, KAMMAVARPET, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BYSRI. VIJAYASHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,BENGALURU- 560001

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU -560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1-R4;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY FOR THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT ANDPANCHAYATH RAJ DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-G.

WP NOS. 36226-36227/2015 BETWEEN:

SMT. REHANA BEGUM C/O SHEIKH SHAFIULLA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.33 11TH CROSS,S H A M P U R A M A I N R O A D , N E X T T O A S H R A F I A M O S Q U E R . T N A G A R P O S T ,BENGALURU-560032 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.


4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL BDA.,COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU -560034, BY ITS SECRETARY



5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1TO R-4;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY FOR THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT ANDPANCHAYATH RAJ DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-G.

W.P. NO. 36383/2015 BETWEEN:

SMT. FATHIMA BEGUM W/O C NASRULLA SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP: S BTRANSPORTS ALI MOHALLA, 3RD BLOCK CHITRADURGA.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDIITONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGBENGALURU-560 001

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC COMPLEX K H ROADBENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

6. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER SHIMOGA REGION RTO OFFICE COMPLEXSAVALANGA ROAD SHIMOGA-577 204.

7. B.G. MRUTHRUJAYA S/O LATE GURAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS BEHIND VISWA FUELNEAR KSRTC BUS STAND PB ROAD, DAVANAGERE.

8. SRI B.G. MANOHAR S/O LATE B.M. GURAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDENT OF M/SVISWAS FUELS, OPP. TO FIRE STATION, PB ROAD DAVANAGERE-577 001.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R4 & R6;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI SIDDANANJAIAH,ADVOCATE, FOR R-7;



SRI R LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-8) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-E.

WP NOS.36511-36515/2015 & W.P.NO.36516/2015 BETWEEN SRI M PRAKASHA RAO S/O LATES R I M U N I R A O A G E D A B O U T 6 1 Y E A R S N O . 5 , C U B B O N P E T M A I N R O A DBENGALURU-560002.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU- 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL B D A COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BENGALURU- 560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU- 560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-KAND THE ORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSEDIN R.P.NO.333 OF 2013, 337 OF 2013, 1215 OF 2012, 88 OF 2015, 100 OF 2015 & 104 OF 2015DTD.6.4.2015, 9.6.2015 AND 5.6.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G, H & J AND QUASH THE IMPUGNEDORDERS BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

WP NOS. 36528-36533/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI M D MUKTHIAR S/O ABDUL GAFFOR, AGED 44 YEARS, TALUK OFFICE ROAD,DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT- 562110

2. SRI G K MANJUNATH S/O G M MANJUNATH, AGED 47 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKASANHALLI,DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT -562110

3. SRI K SRINIVAS S/O CHAMARADA KRISHNAPPA, AGED 45 YEARS, R/A, MARALUBAGILU,DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU DISTRICT- 562110

4. SMT M GIRIJA W/O CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED 49 YEARS, R/A NO.551, SHIVAJYOTHINILAYA, FORT ROAD, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT -562110



5. SMT NOOR JAHAN W/O M D MUKTHIAR, AGED 38 YEARS, TALUK OFFICE ROAD,DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT -562110 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R LOKESH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU -560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORMANGALA, BENGALURU -560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNEX-H.

WP NOS. 36667-36671/2015 & W.P.NO.36672-676/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. A.V.C. VEERABADRAPPA S/O SRI CHICKAPPAIANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YFEARS, POSTOFFICE ROAD, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562135

2. SRI A.S.SHIVAKUMAR S/O SRI A.V. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,PROPRIETOR, VIJAYA MOTORS, VIJAYAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562135

3. SRI S.M. MANJUNATH S/O SRI MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, NO.2, NAGARTHPET,SIDLAGHATTA, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT- 562105

4. SRI A. VENKATESH S/O LATE SRI ACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, "VRUSHABENDRACOMPLEX" SIDLAGHATTA, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT- 562105

5. SMT. SUNITHA W/O LATE SRI. YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX,BASAVESHWARA MOTORS, B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU -572101

6. SRI ANANDAKUMAR S/O SRI M. RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO.2,NAGARTHPET, SIDLAGHATTA, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT- 562105

7. MR. ALLAH BAKASH S/O MR. AMANULLA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, TOMOTO MERCHANT,M.B. ROAD, KOLAR- 563101



8. SRI K. MAHABADRAPPA S/O SRI K. VEERABADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,MALLIKARJUNA MOTOR SERVICE, GANDHINAGAR, CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGADISTRICT -577 522

9. SRI T.B. NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O SRI T.Y. BASAVA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,SRINIVASA MOTORS, NEAR AKASHAVANI, C.K PURA, CHITRADURGA- 577501

10. MR. SYED IBRAHIM S/O MR. SYED KAREEM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, NO.672, MASJIDROAD, 31ST CROSS, THILAK NAGAR, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560041 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.B R SUNDARARAJ GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU -560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-P ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OF DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 36683-36684/2015 BETWEEN:

S R I . N . S I D D A R A M A P P A S / O L A T E K . N I N G A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 6 6 Y E A R S ,PROPRIETOR-S.R.M.S., R/O KADUR, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577548.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S V KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.




SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD:05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED ATANNEXURE-A AND THE NOTIFICATION DTD:07.02.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENTPRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C.

WP NOS. 36685-36688/2015 BETWEEN:

1 . S R I . S . V . M A N J U N A T H S / O S . M . V E E R A N N A , A G E D A B O U T 5 0 Y E A S ,PROPRIETOR-SUMALATHA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O KELAKOTE, CHITRADURGA-577501.

2. SRI S BASAVARAJ S/O LATE S.MALLIKARJUNA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,P R O P R I E T O R - G A N E S H T R A V E L S , N A N D H I , 2 N D C R O S S , F I R S T L I N K R O A D ,PARVATHINAGAR, BELLARY-583103.

3. SRI S C CHANDRASHEKAR S/O CEHNNAVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,P R O P R I E T O R - M R U T H A N J E N A Y A M O T O R S E R V I C E , R / O V . P . E X T E N S I O N ,CHITRADURGA-577501.

4 . S R I R H S U R E S H S / O H A T T I R U D R A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 4 5 Y E A R S ,PROPRIETOR-SHIVAPRASAD MOTOR SERVICE, R/O BANGALORE ROAD, CHALLAKERE,CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD:05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED ATANNEXURE-A AND THE NOTIFICATION DTD:07.02.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENTPRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C.

WP NOS. 36770-36774/2015 & W.P.NOS. 36776- 36780/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SRI. G. MADAN MOHANA REDDY S/O SRI.GURAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,GUNJUR POST, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT PIN: 560087,

2. SRI G V VASANTHA KUMAR S/O.LATE SRI G.V.APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, M/S.VANI TRAVELS, NO.1, AREKEMPANAHALLI, 10TH CROSS, OPPOSITE WILSON GARDEN,BENGALURU.

3. MR SYED FAYAZ AHMED S/O.MR.ABDUL RAZK SAB, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,CHENNASANDRA VILLAGE, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,PIN:563125.

4 . SRI GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O.SRI DODDAMUNI REDDY,"VIJAYALAKSHMI NILAYA" ANJANI LAYOUT, CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,PIN:563125.

5. MR RAFIULLA S/O.MR.REHAMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.3387, 5TH CROSS,GAYATHRINAGAR, BENGALURU-560021.

6. SRI VENKATESH S/O.SRI ERANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.45/2, HESARAGHATTA,BENGALURU-560088.

7. SRI AKMAL SHERIFF S/O. MR.AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.13/8, 2ND MAIN,5TH CROSS, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

8. SRI V RAJANNA S/O.SRI VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.E-25/47,KAMMASANDRA, CHANDAPURA CIRCLE, ELECTRONIC CITY POST, ANEKAL TALUK,BENGALURU DISTRICT, PIN:560100.

9. MR SYED AFSAR S/O.MR.SYED AHMED, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.21, MASJID BILALROAD, NEW PETER, ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN:562106.

10. MR ALTHAFULLA KHAN S/O.MR.PYAREJAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ATTIBELE,BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN:562107.

11. SRI M KUMAR S/O.SRI MUNI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO.24, GIRIJA SHANKARAUTOMOBILES, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560002.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.




SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NO. 36793/2015 BETWEEN:

MR M VENKATESH S/O B P GANGADHAR, AGED 52 YEARS, SRI VENKATESHWARA MOTORSERVICE, NO.94, RACE COURSE ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560001.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S V KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY), NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001

3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, KSTA,BANGALORE, TTMC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFTHE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 (ANNX-D).

WP NO. 36795/ 2015 BETWEEN:

P N NAGENDRA S/O P NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO 12, KAVERINILAYAD - STREET FORT BANGALORE - 560002 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C V KUMAR, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATHRAJ DEPARTMENT HEARING AUTHORITY NO 229, II FLOOR II STAGE, M



S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001.

3 . KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027 BY ITS CHAIRMAN

4. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027 BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE - 560027 BANGALORE BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

6. BANGALORE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION TTMC BUILDING, K H ROADSHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R5;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-1DT.5.8.2015 (ANNX-F).

WP NOS. 37015-37019/ 2015 & WP NOS. 37020- 37021/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI J SATHYANARAYANA S/O. LATE SRI JAI MUNI RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO.174,1ST MAIN ROAD, ST. LAWRENCE HIGH SCHOOL, KAMAKSHIPALAYA, BENGALURU-560 079.

2. SRI.M.P. SANTHOSH KUMAR S/O. SRI. M.V. PRAKASHA BABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,R/AT NO.320/4, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560 002.

3. SRI. S.N. GOPI S/O. LATE SRI NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO.1221, 8TH CROSS,18TH MAIN, FIRST STAGE, B.T.M. LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 029.

4. MR. ABDUL REHAMAN S/O. MR. ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OLD POSTOFFICE ROAD, KUMBARAPETE, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562 114.

5. MR. ABDUL KHAYUM S/O. MR. ABDUL KHADER, AGED BOUT 31 YEARS, OLD POST OFFICEROAD, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562 114.

6. SRI. P.R. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, HANUMAN MOTORSERVICE, SIRA, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN: 572 137.

7. SRI. P.R. SRIRANGA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE,SIRA, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN: 572 137.




1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 37026-37035/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI T RAMESH S/O TIRUMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, 17TH CROSS,7TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 076.

2. SRI.T.VENKATESAN S/O TIRUMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, 17THCROSS, 7TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 076.

3. SMT.PRAMILA.T W/O VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, 17THCROSS, 7TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 076.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESH R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY I FLOOR, A BLOCK, TTMC BUILDINGS,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS SECRETARY.

4 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y B E N G A L U R U R U R A L D I V I S I O N ,KORAMANGALA COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.



5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, SARIGE BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R4;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THEORDER OF THE R-1 GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015, MARKED ANNX-D TO THE W.P.

WP NOS. 37055-37079/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI A.P. GOPI KRISHNA S/O LATE A.M.POONURANGA MUDALIAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARSNO.47, MOHAN MANSION, KASTURABHA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.

2. M/S. NAGARJUNA MOTOR SERVICE NO.597, S.S.TEMPLE STREET, V.V.PURAM,BENGALURU-560004, REPTD. BY SRI H.N.HARI. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

3. SRI B J RAJA S/O.LATE D.V.JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BANGALORETRANSPORTS, NO.507, ASWATHAKATTA ROAD, V.V.PRUAM, BENGALURU-560004.

4. SRI B V SOMASHEKAR REDDY S/O VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,UMASHANKAR ROADWAYS, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU.

5. SRI D L SADASHIVA REDDY S/O LAKSHMAIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,SUVARNAMUKHI EXPRESS, NO.607, 10TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR, 7TH BLOCK WEST,BENGALURU-560082.

6. SRI R SUBRAMANYAM S/O THIRU RAMASWAMY GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARSNO.42E, 4TH CROSS, SHANTINAGAR, HOSUR, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADUSTATE.

7. SRI M GANESHAN S/O R.MUTHUSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.20/1, SWAMYCOMPLEX, A.V.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027.

8. SRI DAYANANDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE G.A.RAMAIAH REDDY, GAJANANAMOTOR SERVICE, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560027.

9. SMT SHAKUNTALA J REDDY W/O LATE J.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,J.N.R. MOTOR SERVICE, AVENUE ROAD, MADANAPALLI, CHITTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRAPRADESH STATE.

10. SRI C VENUGOPAL RAO S/O LATE HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARD, 17-4-6,RPGT ROAD, HINDUPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.



... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S V KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING,BENGALURU-560001.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-F.

WP NOS.37080-37084/2015 & W.P.NOS.37085- 37089/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI B.A. LINGA REDDY S/O B.ANANTHA REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, S.R.EXPRESS,CHITRADURGA, PIN-577 501.

2. SRI.D.T. MAHABALESH S/O D.THIPPESWAMY, AGE 52 YEARS, KARNATAKA MOTORSERVICE, CHURCH LAYOUT, CHITRADURGA PIN-577 501.

3. SRI.P.R.MANJUNATH S/O P.M.RANGANATH, AGE 52 YEARS, HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE,SIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT PIN-572 137.

4. SRI H.KOTRESH S/O GURUBASAPPA, AGE 55 YEARS, MOHINI MOTORS, C.K.PURA ROAD,CHITRADURGA PIN-577 501.

5. SRI.B.S. DEVENDRAPPA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA, AGE 48 YEARS, CHICKKAHOBANAHALLI,MOLAKALMUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DIST PIN-577 504.

6. SRI.H.V. GOVINDARAJ SETTY S/O G.S. VENKATACHALPATHI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SLRTRAVELLS, HIRIYUR, C.N.HALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DIST PIN-572 104.

7. MOHAMMED ASLAM S/O ABDUL SATTAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S.S.P. MOTORSERVICE, BILICHUR, JAGALUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DIST PIN-577 528.



8. SRI.S.V.NAGARAJ S/O M.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, MAHANTESWARAINDUSTRIES, B.G.KERE, CHITRADURGA DIST. PIN 577 527.

9. SRI V.H.KUMAR S/O THIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, GITAANJANEYA MOTORSERVICE, 11TH CROSS, MCC-B BLOCK, P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE, PIN-577 001.

10. SRI M.MANJUNATH S/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,BADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DIST PIN-577 301 .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:




4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDATED 05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-F.

WP NOS. 37255-37259/2015 & W.P.NOS.37260- 261/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI P VENKATACHALUM PROP. MAHADEVA MOTORS AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS K BBADAVANE DAVANAGERE- 577 003

2. SRI L SHIVAKUMAR S/O LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PROP. MAHADEVA MOTORS#116/88, D, KIRUWADI LAYOUT K B BADAVANE DAVANAGERE- 577 003

3. J R ZAFRULLA KHAN S/O LATE RASHEED KHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP: DADAEXPRESS 4TH CROSS, AZAD NAGAR NEAR WATER TANK CHITRADURGA -577 501

4. J R SHAFIULLA KHAN S/O LATE RASHEED KHAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PROP: ISLAMIAMOTOR SERVICE , HORAPETE NEAR BASAWESHWARA TALKIES CHITRADURGA -577 501



5. N M IRSHAD BASHA S/O S ABDUL MUNAF SAB BUS OPERATOR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARSNAYAKANAHATTI -577 536 CHALLAKERE (TALUK) CHITRADURGA (DIST)

6. C MOHAMMED NASRULLA SHARIFF S/O C SHAIK AMEER SAB AGED ABOUT 64 YEARSPROP: S B TRANSPORT ALI MOHALLA CHITRADURGA

7. C MOHAMMED IRFANULLA SHARIFF S/O C SHAIK AMEER SAB AGED ABOUT 58 YEARSPROP: S B TRANSPORT ALI MOHALLA CHITRADURGA ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C M SSHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY / ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGE M S BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGBENGALURU- 560 001

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION KONDAJJI ROADDAVANAGERE- 577 003 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA- 577 501 BYITS SECRETARY

6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1-R5;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-L.

WP NOS. 37263-37267/2015 & W.P.NO.37268- 37270/2015 BETWEEN:

1. M.KRISHNAMURTHY S/O M. MUNI RAJ, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.120/1, 2ND FLOORCUBBONPET MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 002.

2. R.L. LAKSHMI NARAYAN S/O LATE N. RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.15, 6THCROSS, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 069.

3. SMT. HEMAVATHI W/O LAKSHMI NARAYAN, AGE MAJOR, NO.15, 6TH CROSS,JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 069.



4. B. RAJANNA AGE MAJOR, S/O LATE BASAPPA, SAJJAN RAO ROAD, V.V. PURAM,BENGALURU-560 019.

5. MASTARI JAN BEGUM W/O S. SALALHUDDIN AGE MAJOR, R.V. ROAD CROSS,BASAVANGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004.

6. NAGARAJ M.H.

AGE MAJOR S/O KALLEGOWDA NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND, IJUR, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT.

7. SMT. M.D. GAYATHRI AGE MAJOR, W/O LATE H.D. KESAVA MURTHY, PROP: SNMS,HEBBUR, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

8. MANJUNATH AGE MAJOR S/O DODDAMALLAPPA, NO.565, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS,THIMMENAHALLI, GOVINDARAJA NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 027.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034. BY ITS SECRETARY.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3 & R5;

SRI. HARISH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-G.

WP NOS. 37419-37423/2015 & W.P.NOS.37424- 427/2015 & W.P.NOS. 37583-592/2015BETWEEN:



1. AGHA KHAN AGE 56 YEARS, S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, NO.98/101, R.V. COMPLEX,KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002.

2. AHAFFIZ KHAN AGE 58 YEARS, S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, NO.98/101, R.V. COMPLEX,KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, BENALURU-560 002.

3. SALEEM KHAN AGE 54 YEARS, S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, NO.98/101, R.V. COMPLEX,KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002.

4. KHAYUM KHAN AGE 60 YEARS, S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, NO.98/101, R.V. COMPLEX,KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002.

5. MANJUNATH PRASANNA S/O APPANNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO.C-104,GOLDEN STREET APARTMENT, HOODI, BENGALURU-560 036.

6. SAMPANGI RAMEGOWDA AGE 37 YEARS, S/O LATE D.RAMEGOWDA BUS OPERATOR,DOMMASANDRA, KOLAR DISTRICT.

7. SRINIVASAGOWDA AGE 36 YEARS, S/O LATE D. RAMEGOWDA BUS OPERATOR,DOMMASANDRA, KOLAR DISTRICT.

8. SMT. REHANA BUGUM AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS W/O SHAKE SAFIULLA, NO.33, 11TH CROSS,SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU -560 032.

9. ANNAYAPPA AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE SEENAPPA, VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE,KAMMAVARPET, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING,BENGALURU-560001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY .. . RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3 & R5;



SRI HARISH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-G.

WP NO. 37428/ 2015 BETWEEN:

SRI G.A. SANAULLA S/O G AMANULLA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.89, MAHALAKSHMILAYOUT, KHUTUB SHAHIN SHA NAGAR, KOLAR-563101.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. SMT. REHANA BEGUM W/O SHAIK SHAFIULLA, NO.33, 11TH CROSS, SHOMPURA MAINROAD, NEXT TO ASHRAFIYA MASAJID, R T NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION , K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-H.


SRI G.A. SANAULLA S/O G AMANULLA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.89, MAHALAKSHMILAYOUT, KHUTUB SHAHIN SHA NAGAR, KOLAR-563101 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C M SSHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY



3. SMT REHANA BEGUM W/O SHAIK SHAFIULLA, NO.33, 11TH CROSS, SHOMPURA MAINROAD, NEXT TO ASHRAFIYA MASAJID, R T NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R-2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4;

SRI. A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTCILE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THER-1 DTD: 05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-H.

WP NOS. 37431-37436/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI S. MANOHAR S/O. SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SANDHYA TOURS &TRAVELS, NO.21/14, T.S.P. ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560 002.

2. SRI. M. SHARATH S/O. SRI. S. MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, SANDHYA TOURS &TRAVELS, NO.21/14, T.S.P. ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560 002.

3. SRI. J. MUNIRAJU S/O. B.A. JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.5, GROVER ROAD,BANGALORE-560 005.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C NARASIMHACHAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027. REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4. MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.


SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4) THESE WRITPETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-1 DTD: 05.08.2015



(ANNEXURE-C).


SMT.H.R.MANJULA W/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGE 35 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, DANADAMMADEVI ROAD, HENNUR VILLAGE, KALYANANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 043.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA.,COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THER-1 DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.


SRI.ZABIULLA S/O SHEIK AHAMED, AGED 55 YEARS NEW VIJAYALAKSMI TRANSPORT,MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR, CHITRADURGA.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, T.T.M.C COMPLEX,"A"BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 &R2;



SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E.


SRI.N.S. RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE H SRIKANTHAIAH AGED 60 YEARS NO.178, TEACHERSCOLONY CHANDAPURA CIRCLE ANEKAL ROAD BENGALURU 560081 ... PETITIONER (BYSRI.B R SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU -560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU- 560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1& R2;

SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.


SRI.G.DHARANESH S/O LATE N GOVIDRAO, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.422, 56TH CROSS,3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA, BENGALURU -560010.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.B R SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-G.




SRI B.R. NANDISH S/O B RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS NO.18, 665/A, SAJJAN RAOROAD, V V PURAM, BENGALURU-560 004 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.B R SHAILENDRA,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 &R2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-G.


SMT.MAQBOOL W/O SIRAJ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 17, 3RD CROSS, 8THMAIN, 3RD BLOCK, EAST JAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560011 .. . PETITIONER (BYSRI.SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETASRY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR REGION, KOLAR 533101 BY ITSSECRETARY

3 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THER-1 DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.

WP NOS. 37551-37552/2015 & W.P.NO. 37725/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.N.S. SHIVAKUMAR S/O SARABAPPA SOGI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 1ST CROSS,RAVINDRA NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577 202.



2. SRI. H.C. CHIDANANDA REDDY S/O SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,S.R.EXPRESS, N.H.4, CHITRADURGA, PIN-577 501.





4. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TTMC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD,BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS SECRETARY.

5 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRSH, AGA FOR R1-R4;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE FILES ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYTHE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DATED 5.8.2015VIDE ANN-G.


SMT.NAFISA SULATNA D/O SRI B ABDUL LATIF AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.03, RATNAVIALS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560004 .. . PETITIONER (BY SRI.B RSHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU- 560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHADNARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE



R-1 DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-G.


SRI N.S.PRABHU S/O LATE H SRIKANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.178, TEACHERSCOLONY, NELLURU (POST)-562 106 ANEKAL (TALUK) BENGALURU (DIST.) ... PETITIONER(BY SRI. B R SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 &R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDAPRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.


SRI. S. MANOHAR S/O SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.24/13, AZEEMABUILDING, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560 002. (REPRESENTED BY THE TRANSFAREE)SRI S.NAJEEB AHMED, S/O LATE S.MUNEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, #13/2, KHAZISTREET CROSS, BEHIND KHALEEL PLAZA, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEXKORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 0034 BY ITS SECRETARY.


... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;

SRI.T HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-G.

WP NOS. 37711-37713/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SRI S V RAGHUNANDAN S/O S M VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, PROPRIETORSUMALATHA MOTORS, R/O B G KERE, MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577535

2. SRI M R ABDUL MAJEED S/O ABDUL RAHEEM AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, PROPRIETOR S RM S R/O MOLAKALMURU, MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577535

3. SRI R P ABDUL RAHMAN SAB S/O ABDUL AZIZ SAHEB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,PROPRIETOR ELAHI MOTOR SERVICE, R/O ELAHI LANE, BELLARY, BELLARY DISTRICT-583102.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING DR AMBEDKARVEEDHI, BENGALURU -560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDINGK H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 ) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEX-A ANDTHE NOTIFICATION DTD.7.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEX-C.

WP NOS. 37714-37715/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI VENKATESAN T S/O LATE THIRUMALAPPA PROPRIETOR:

VENKATESHWARA TRAVELS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O NO. 6, 17TH CROSS 7TH MAIN,BTM 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560076 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.A SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT BY ITS SECRETARY M S BUIDINGDR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001

2. THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJDEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560001



3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY TTMC BUILDING KH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY BENGALURU RURAL B D ACOMPLEX KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560034

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY BENGALURU URBAN TTMCBUILDING 2ND FLOOR, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560011

6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R5;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-BAND THE NOTIFICATION DTD.7.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED ATANNEXURE-C.


SRI. P.R. MANJUNATH S/O LATE P M RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS PROP :HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE, SIRA - 572137 TUMKUR (DIST).

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR REGION REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE PUNE- BENGALURU - ROAD TUMKURU - 572101 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1& R2; SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.

WP NO. 37747/2015 & W.P.NO.37945/2015 BETWEEN:

S R I . P . R . M A N J U N A T H S / O L A T E P M R A N G A N A T H , A G E D A B O U T 5 2 Y E A R S ,PROP:HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE, SIRA -572137 TUMKUR (DIST).

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:



1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY , T T M C COMPLEX, 'A'BLOCK, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-500027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINGAR,BANGALORE 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.


SRI. N.S. RAMAKRISHA S/O LATE H SRIKANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO.178,TEACHERS COLONY, CHANDAPURA CIRCLE, ANEKAL ROAD, BENGALURU-560 081.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEXKORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P S O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.


SMT. G.H. BHAGYALAKSHMI W/O. P.R. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP:HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE SIRA-572 137, TUMKUR DISTRICT.





2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A"BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNXURE-E.


SRI B A LINGAREDDY S/O ANANTHAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROP: SRE TRAVELSHEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPLE SECRTARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A"BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-500 027

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 &R2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DATED 5.8.2015 AS PER ANNXURE-E.

WP NOS. 38042-38044/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI M KRISHNAPPA @ MUNIRAJU S/O MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.88,RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE WHITEFIELD POST, BENGALURU-560066.

2. SRI.G.M.ASHWATHA REDDY S/O LATE SRI.V.MUNISWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 39YEARS, JAI BHARATH MOTOR SERVICE, GUNJUR, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560087.




1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERT1IORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 38051-38052/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI R KATHIRESAN PROPRIETOR, SHIVARAJ TRANSPORTS, NO.19/20, MANASARA ROAD,ITTIGEGUD, INDIRA NAGAR, MYSORE-570 010 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SRI VANANTHARAMU S/O LATE VENKATESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS NO.7/1, THANDANTARMILK CENTRE DEWANS ROAD, DEVARAJ MOHALLA, MYSORE

2. SRIRAM TRANSPORTS 19/20, MANASARA ROAD, ITTIGEGUD ,INDIRA NAGARMYSORE-570 010 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI R KATHIRESAN REPRESENTED BYHIS GPA HOLDER, SRI V ANANTHARAMU S/O LATE VENKATESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71YEARS NO.7/1, THANDANTAR MILK CENTRE, DEWANS ROAD, DEVARAJ MOHALLA,MYSORE .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT.

TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.M.T.C. COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R4;



SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-F.


SRI Y N SRINIVAS S/O SRI.NARAYAN SWAMY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, INDIRA NAGAR,BEHIND T.B., CHIKKABALLAPURA CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A SPARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229,2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BANGALORE-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (BANGALORE RURAL) B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEUNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DT.5.8.2015 AS PERANNX-F.

WP NOS.38054-38057/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAFI S/O ABDUL RAWOOF SAB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3RD MAIN, BISMILLANAGAR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-560029

2. SRI.N.VENKATESH S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.577, ESHWARATEMPLE ROAD, WARD NO.16, CHIKKABALLAPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT

3. SRI.D.A.MANJUNATH S/O SRI.ASHWATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, WARD NO.29,CHAMARAJPET, CHIKKABALLAPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT



4. SRI. PRASHANTH.B.V.

S/O VENKATARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR BANAHALLI, NEARYELLAMMA TEMPLE CHANDAPURA POST, ANEKAL TALUK-562106 BANGALORE RURALDISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND REGISTERING AUTHORITY, B.D.A.COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-F.

WP NOS. 38247-38259/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI N CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SRI K NIGAPPA PROP. SIDARAMESHWARA MOTOR SERVICEAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS KADUR -577 548 CHIKAMANGALURU (DIST).

2. SRI M D SALEEM S/O M D ABID AGED ABOUT 51 YERS PROP. MERCHANT TRANSPORTKOBARIPETE HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

3. SMT R S SHASHIKALA W/O R K VEERABASSANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS GURUKOTRESHWARA NILAYA CHIKAGONDANNAHALLI CHITRADURGA -577 501

4. SRI M S SHIVAKUMAR S/O M SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP:THIPPESWAMY TRANSPORT CHITRADURGA -577 501

5. SRI H VENKATESH S/O HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PROP: SLR TRANSPORTBUMBOO DEPO ROAD BUMBOO BAZAR HIRIYUR- 572 143



6. SMT D SAILAKSHMI W/O M G KUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS PROP: SLR TRANSPORTNEW SANTHEMAIDANA, 4TH BLOCK CHITRADURGA- 577 501

7. SRI B THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS PROP: THIPPESWAMY TRANSPORTDODDASIDDAVANAHALLI CHITRADURGA -577 501

8. SRI H B JAGADEESH S/O SRI PARAMESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROP:KALLESHWARA MOTORS HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

9. SRI J SRINIVASKUMAR S/O SRI JAYADEVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS PROP:VENKATESHWARA TRANSPORT CHITRADURGA- 577 501

10. SRI K B RAMESH S/O SRI SIDDAPPA BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS PROP:VENKATESHWARA TRANSPORT CHITRADURGA- 577 501

11. SRI A S RAGHU S/O SRI SIDDAPPA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS BUS OPERATORJYOTINAGARA HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST) ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M SSHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING BENGALURU- 560 001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA -577501 BYITS SECRETARY

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R4;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD:05.08.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-P.

W.P. Nos. 38260-38264/2015 & 38265-38269/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI J R ZAFRULLA KHAN S/O LATE RASHEED KHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP:DADAEXPRESS 4TH CROSS, AZAD NAGAR NEAR WATER TANK CHITRDURGA-577501.



2. SRI J R RAHIM KHAN S/O LATE RASHEED KHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROP: RTSMOTOR SERVICE JAGALURU-577528 DAVANAGERE (DIST).

3. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O T S HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BASAVANAKOTE(POST) JAGALURU-577528 DAVANAGERE (DIST) (REP. BY GPA HOLDER SRI K.G.M.KALLINATH)

4. SRI A MANJUNATH S/O A SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PROP: SRI GAYATHRIMOTORS HOLALKERE ROAD CHITRADURGA-577501 (REP. BY GPA HOLDER SRI K.S.ILLIYAZ)

5. SRI M S GANDHI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER PROP: SRI DEVTRANSPORT # 734/1, KRISHNA ENGINEERING COMPLEX, OPPSITE OLD BUS STAND,DAVANAGERE-5 (REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SRI S IMTIYAZ)

6. SRI M V RAMESH S/O VITHOB RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PROP: MALASAMBHA MOTORSERVICE, BHADRAVATHI.

7. SRI R NASEER AHAMED S/O GAFFAR SHARIEFF AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS BUS OPERATORNEAR R K MEDICALS M G ROAD, CHINTAMANI-563125 CHICKABALLAPUR (DIST) ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGBENGALURU-560001.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION KONDAJJI ROADDAVANAGERE-577003 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A" BLOCK K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS SECRETARY

6 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INIRESH,AGA FOR R1-R5;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-K.



W.P. NOS. 38270-38271/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K ANANTHARAJ S/O LATE KRISHNAMRAJ, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, MADHUSUDANMOTOR SERVICE, GULPET, KOLAR PIN-563 101

2. SRI.K.RAMAKRISHNA RAJU S/O K.ANANTHARAJ, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, MADHUSUDANMOTOR SERVICE, GULPET, KOLAR PIN-563 101 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALAURU-560 001.



4. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BMTC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMNETDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G.

W.P. NOS. 38272-38273/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAJGOPAL GOWDA S/O B SAKKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.446, 14THCROSS LAKKASANDRA AUDUGODI POST BANGALORE-560 030.

2. SMT. USHARANI W/O RAJAGOPAL GOWDA AGEDA BOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.446, 14THCROSS LAKKASANDRA AUDUGODI POST BANGALORE-560 030.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.



2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE (RURAL), BANGALORE BDACOMPLEX, KORMANGALA BANGALORE, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE-560 027 REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DTD:5/8/2015 (ANNEXURE-E).

W.P. NOS. 38341-38352/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI T.M. GANESHAN S/O P. MARAPPA GOUDAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP:VIJAYALAKSHMI TRANSPORT, B.B. ROAD, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT

2. SRI. ZABIULLA S/O SHEIK AHAMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NEW VIJAYALAKSHMITRANSPORT, MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA-577501

3. SRI. M.S. SHIVAKUMAR S/O M. SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP:THIPPESWAMY TRANSPORT, CHITRADURGA-577501

4. SRI. MOHAMMED ALTAF S/O ABDUL HAFEEZ SAB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROP: NEWVIJAYALAKSHMI TRANSPORT, B.B. ROAD, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT

5. SRI. F. RHAMATULLA S/O H.M. FAQRUDDIN SAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PROP: NEWVIJAYALAKSHMI TRANSPORT, B.B. ROAD, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT

6. SRI.N. SHANAMUGAM S/O NACHIYANNA GOUNDER AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP:VIJAYALAKSHMI MOTOR SERVICE, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-01.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501 BYITS SECRETARY



3. THE KARNTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-27 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI HAREESH KUMAR, M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-J.

W.P. NO. 38354/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI N.S.RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE H SRIKANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NO.178,TEACHERS COLONY CHANDAPURA CIRCLE ANEKAL ROAD, BENGALURU - 560081.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BENGALURU- 560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 &2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S. ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-G.

W.P. NOS. 38360-38362/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K.S. SIDDARAJE URS S/O B M SIDDARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/ANANJANGUD ROAD, T N PURA, MYSORE DISTRICT-571124

2. SRI P PUTTARAJU S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 47 YEASR, THIRAMAKUDALU, TN PURA, MYSORE DISTRICT -571124

3. SRI R R SHANMUGAM S/O DASAPPA GOUDAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KUVEMPUBADAVANE, SATTI ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.LOKESH R,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTI-STOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSORE REGIOANL, BY ITS SECRETARY,MYSORE-570001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNX-A TO THE ABOVE WRIT PETITIONS BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. NO. 38386/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI KRISHNOJI RAO S/O SHANKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.422, 56TH CROSS 3RDBLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA BENGALURU- 560010.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BENGALURU- 560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1& 2;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-G.

W.P. Nos. 38478-38502/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. SAMPANGIRAMA S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS NO. 258, 24TH 'A' CROSS1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560009.

2. SRI S MANOJ KUMAR S/O SAMPANGIRAMA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS NO 258, 24TH 'A'CROSS 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560009.

3. SRI K V HARISH S/O R KRISHNA REDDY AGE: MAJOR HARI KRUPA, MIRJA ROADANEKAL, BANGALORE DIST., PIN - 562106



4. SRI SUNIL V S/O VENKATESH REDDY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS NO. 101, SAMPANGI NILAYASUNDERRAJ LAYOUT ANEKAL.

5. SRI K V SRINIVASA S/O R KRISHNAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS HARI KRUPA, MIRJAROAD ANEKAL, BANGALORE DIST ., PIN - 562106

6. SRI T SATYA NARAYANA S/O LATE TANGAVELU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS MARUTHIMOTOR SERVICE VINAYA MARGA, SIDARTHA NAGAR MYSURU - 570002.

7. RANI SATYANARAYANA W/O T SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS MARUTHIMOTOR SERVICE VINAYA MARGA, SIDARTHA NAGAR MYSURU - 570002.

8. SWARAJ AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O T SATYANARAYANA MARUTHI MOTOR SERVICEVINAYA MARGA, SIDARTHA NAGAR MYSURU - 570002

9. N MUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH PROP: SLNS MOTORSERVICE NO. 1649, SRIRAMAPURA BENGALURU - 560021

10. M JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O N MUDDAPPA PROP: SLNS MOTOR SERVICENO. 1649, SRIRAMAPURA BENGALURU - 560021

11. K S RAVI KUMAR AGE MAJOR S/O SEETHAPPA NO 550/620, VENKATAPPA LAYOUTSUNKADAKATTE, MAGADI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU.

12. K S HANUMANTHAPPA S/O GANGAPPA BUS OPERATOR DODDABALLAPUR, BENGALURU.

13. R GURURAJ AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O RAMANATHAN NO. 2, DEVANAGAR STREETCHAMARAJNAGAR PIN - 571313

14. P S P CHANDIRAN S/O P S PALINISAMY CHETTIAR NO. 2, DEVANGAR STREETCHAMARAJNAGAR PIN - 571313

15. B S VENKATANAGAPPA SHETTY S/O B S VENKATARANTAM SHETTY AGED ABOUT 40YEARS BSV MOTOR SERVICE BIG BAZAR STREET CHAMARAJNAGAR - 571313

16. P GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O A PERUMAL, NO. 83, BEML LAYOUT,KOLAR.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001.



2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGBENGALURU - 560001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1-R3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-F.

W.P.NOS. 38528-38530/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. P. DHANALAKSHMI W/O SRI M.K PONNUSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,ATHIGULIURA, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT- 571313

2. SMT. KOKILAMANI W/O. R. DORAI SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, ATTIGULIPURAPOST, H.D. FOREST, DOLLIPURA- 571 127 CHAMARAJANAGAR.

3. SRI M.B.MEHABOOB SHERIEF AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP: S.R.M.S VARADHIMOHALLA, MOLAKALMUR, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.V.KRISHNAMURTHY AND SRI A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE- 560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTI-STORIEDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE- 560001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY B.M.T.C COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, K.HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE -560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE- 560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;



SRI M S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-F.

W.P. NOS. 38546-38548/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI B S SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE P. SUBBARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING ATNO.76 III MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHAN SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) BANGALORE RURAL BDA COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROADBANGALORE-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR-572 101 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE SECRETARY AND CHAIRMAN REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR -572101.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 & R5;

SRI HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-H.

W.P. NOS. 38790-38808/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI E V VIJAYAKUMAR S/O SRI E VAJRAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS PROP: VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE HOSADURGA- 577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST)

2. SRI E V PURUSHOTHAM S/O SRI E VAJRAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS PROP: VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST)

3. SRI E V AJAPPA S/O SRI E VAJRAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP: VIJAYA MOTORSERVICE HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

4. E V SHEETAL KUMAR S/O SRI E VAJRAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PROP: VIJAYA MOTORSERVICE HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).



5. SRI E V VARDHAMAN S/O SRI E VAJRAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROP: VIJAYA MOTORSERVICE HOSADURGA- 577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

6. SRI E V JEETENDRA S/O SRI E V VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PROP: VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE HOSADURGA -577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

7. SRI E V CHETANKUMAR A/O E D VASANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PROP: VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE HOSADURGA- 577 527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560 001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY / ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTNO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING BENGALURU- 560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING,BENGALURU -560 001.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION KONDAJJI ROADDAVANAGERE- 577 003 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA- 577 501 BYITS SECRETARY

6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TOR5;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-K.

W.P. NOS. 38809-38812/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI S SACHIDANANDA CHATRA S/O LATE GOVINDA CHATRA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS SRIDURGAMBA MAIN ROAD, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001.



2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,BENGALURU-560001.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-D.

W.P. NOS. 38813-38815/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT NOOR TAJ W/O IQBAL AHAMED AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D. NO. 2, 1ST 'B' MAIN ROADSUDHAM NAGAR BENGALURU - 560027

2. IQBAL AHAMED S/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS D. NO. 2, 1ST MAINROAD SUDHAM NAGAR BENGALURU - 560027.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING,BENGALURU - 560001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1-3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-D.

W.P. Nos. 38836-38837/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SMT ARUNA KUMARI C/O ASHOK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS KUNDANAHALLIHURALAGUND POST MALUR TALUK KOLAR DIST.- 563 130

2. SRI K M ASHOK KUMAR S/O MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS KUNDANAHALLIMALUR TALUK- 563 130 KOLAR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H B NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE- 560 001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) BANGALORE RURAL B D A COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BANGALORE -560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR K H ROAD,BANGALORE- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G.

WP NO. 38899/2015 & W.P.NOs.38900-901/2015 & W.P.NOs.38952-953/2015 BETWEEN

1. SRI S.V. NAGARAJ S/O S.M.VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:SUMALATHAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O HOUSING BOARD COLONY, CHITRADURGA-577506.

2 . S R I B S D E V E N D R A P P A S / O B . S H I V A L I N G A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 4 3 Y E A R S ,CHIKKOBANAHALLI, MOLAKALMURU T, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT- 577535.

3. SRI V H KUMAR S/O R.K.CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YERS, SRI GEETHANJENEYAMOTORS, R/O 3245, 11TH MAIN, MCC "B" BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577006.

4. SRI M R SATISH S/O.M.C.RENUKARYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SRI AMARESWARAEXPRES, R/O 3RD CROSS, HOLALKERE ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501.

5. SRI MOHD. ASLAM S/O ABDUL SATTAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, SHIVAPRAKASHMOTOR SERVICE, R/O BILICHODU, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577553.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE-577001.

3 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y R E P . B Y I T S S E C R E T A R Y ,CHITRADURGA-577501.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP.BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DTD:05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED ATANNEXURE-A.

W.P. NO. 38903/2015 BETWEEN:

SMT. SIDDAMMA W/O LATE M REVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS PROPRIETRIXREPUBLIC MOTOR SERVICE R/O SIRIGERE CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT-57541 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M. S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DAVANAGERE-577001.

3 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y , R E P . B Y I T S S E C R E T A R YCHITRADURGA-577501.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONDATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A.

W.P.NOS. 38904-38923/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI G.B. SHEKARAPPA S/O BASAVANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RAGHAVENDRAAGENCIES, R/O HOLALKERE ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501

2 . S R I K A N A N D S / O K U M A R A S W A M Y S E T T Y A G E D A B O U T 5 7 Y E A R S , S R IKARTHIKESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O GOPALPURA ROAD, 2ND CROSS, DHARJI



COLONY, CHITRADURGA-577501

3. SRI R M SHIVSHANKARAPPA S/O R MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, REVANASIDDESHWARA, R/O HIREHALLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501

4 . S M T D T S O W B H A G Y A W / O R M T H I P P E S W A M Y A G E D A B O U T 4 5 Y E A R S ,PROPRIETRIX-REVANA SIDDESHWARA, R/O HIREHALLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK,CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501

5 . S M T G M S U D H A W / O R M S H I V A S H A N K A R A G E D A B O U T 4 0 Y E A R S ,PROPRIETRIX-REVANA SIDDESHWARA, R/O HIREHALLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK,CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501

6. SRI P VENKATACHALAM S/O PALANIYAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MAHADEVAMOTORS, R/O NO.116/88D, KIRUWADI LAYOUT, K B BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577002 REP.BY ITS GPA HOLDER MD. ABUBEKAR SIDDIQ S/O IBRAHIM SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/OOPP. CANARA BANK PROP: BHARATH MOTORS SERVICE NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE(T) CHITRADURGA (DIST.)

7. SRI N RAVI S/O NALLATHAMBI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, DHANALAXMI MOTORS, R/ONO.116/88D, KIRUWADI LAYOUT, K B BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577002 REP. BY THE GPAHOLDER MD. ABUBEKAR SIDDIQ S/O IBRAHIM SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O OPP.CANARA BANK PROP: BHARATH MOTORS SERVICE NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE (T)CHITRADURGA (DIST)

8. SRI MOHD ABUBEKAR SIDDIQ S/O IBRAHAIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OWNERR/O NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577536

9. SRI G C THIPPESWAMY S/O R K CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,GEETHANJENEYA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O NO.3245/2, 2ND MAIN, M C C, 'B' BLOCK,DAVANAGERE-577002

10. SRI M ESHWARAIAH S/O BASAIAH , AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, MARULA SIDDESHWARAMOTORS, R/O HURLIHAL, KUDLIGI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583126

11 . SRI H M SIDDALINGAIAH S/O BASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, MARULASIDDESHWARA MOTORS, R/O HURLIHAL, KUDLIGI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583126

12. SRI G LOKESHAPPA S/O S HALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SRI AMARESWARAMOTORS, R/O DEVIKERE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577528 REP. BY ITSGPA HOLDER M.R. SATHISH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O M.C. RENUKARYA PROP:AMARESHWARA MOTORS HOLALKERE ROAD CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT.



13. SRI B S VEERESH S/O LOKANATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OWNER R/O NO.560/10,7TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, SHIVAKUMARSWAMY BADAVANE,DAVANAGERE-577002

14. SRI G T VIJAYAKUMAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, 14(a) SATHVIK G V S/O LATE G.T.V I J A Y A K U M A R A G E D A B O U T 4 0 Y E A R S , S R I V I J A Y A T R A N S P O R T S , R / OCHIKKAGONDANAHALLI, CHITRADURGA-577501

15. SRI B V SURENDRAPPA S/O L VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BUS OWNER, R/ORAMAGONDANAHALLI, DAVANAGERE TK & DISTRICT-577002

16. SRI M PARAMESHWARAPPA S/O MARALASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, REPUBLICMOTOR SERVICE, R/O P B ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501

17. SRI G S RAJU S/O SHIVAMURTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, REPUBLIC MOTORSERVICE, R/O P B ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501

18. SMT M P SUDHA D/O PARAMESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, REPUBLICMOTORS, R/O OPP. TO OLD BUS STAND, KRISHNA ENGG.BUILDING, DAVANAGERE-577002

19. SRI ABDUL AZEEM S/O K IMAM SAB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROPRIETOR-S.M.M.S R/OBILICHODU, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577553

20. SRI S N MANJUNATHA SHARMA S/O M S NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SRS MOTORSERVICE, R/O KURAGATTI, ARALAHALLI, HB HALLI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583104 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M. S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE-577001


4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BELLARY/HOSPETREGION, BELLARY-583101

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-14(a);

SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-4;



SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-1 DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENTPRODUCED AT ANNX-A.

W.P. NOS. 38924-38925/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K.R. SHIVAPRAKASH S/O K RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS PROP : JAYAPADMAMOTOR SERVICE R/O CHITRADURGA - 577501

2. SRI G K VENKATASHIVA REDDY S/O KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARSVENKATESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE VENKATESHWARA EXTENSION CHINTHAMANIKOLAR DISTRICT - 563125 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M SBUILDING , DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TTMCBUILDING K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 027

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY CHITRADURGA -577501

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

WP NOS. 38927-38949/2015 & W.P.NOS.38950- 951/2015 & W.P.NO.42696-706/2015BETWEEN:

1. SRI M.N HARISH S/O M NAGRAJ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE,R/O NO.3734/7, VENKATESHWARA EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 002

2. SMT POORNIMA MANJUNATH W/O MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/ONO.1855/17,VIVEKANANDA BADAVANE, 3RD CROSS, DAVANAGERE-577 002

3. SRI M NAGARAJ S/O LATE MUREGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS VENKATESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O 1ST CROSS, RIGHT SIDE, BHADRAVATHI-577 302



4. SRI B K BALAKRISHNA RAO S/O KHANDOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS PROP:MAHADEVA MOTORS, R/O NO.55, 6TH CROSS, "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT,DAVANAGERE-577 002

5. SRI B K VITTAL RAO S/O KHANDOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROP: MAHADEVAMOTORS, R/O NO.55, 6TH CROSS, "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, DAVANAGERE-577002

6. SRI T PALANISWAMY S/O THIRUMALAI GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS PROP:MAHADEVA MOTORS, R/O P.B. ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 002

7. SRI C CHINNASWAMY S/O CHINNA GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS PROP:MAHADEVA MOTORS, R/O P.B. ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 002

8. SRI P PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O PALANISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS SRI MAHADEVATRAVELS, R/O 734/4, SRI KRISHNA ENGG. WORKS COMPOUND, OPP. TO OLD BUS STAND, PB ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 007

9. SRI S R GIRISH S/O LATE RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS MADHURI MOTOR SERVICER/O SHIVAGANGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577110

10. SMT S J SHANTHA W/O S R JAGADEESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS MADHURI MOTORS R/OSHIVAGANGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577110

11. SMT K G SHANTHA W/O S R GIRISH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS MADHURI MOTORS R/OSHIVAGANGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577110

12. SRI K S MALLESHAPPA S/O K S SHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP :MALTHESHA MOTOR SERVICE R/O NO 97, 8TH CROSS "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URSBADAVANE, DAVANGERE - 577008

13. SMT S N RACHNA W/O SHAMBU SHEKAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MALTHESHA MOTORSERVICE R/O NO 97, 8TH CROSS "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS BADAVANE, DAVANGERE -577008.

1 4 . S R I K A N D O J I R A O S / O L A T E D E V E N D R A P P A A G E D A B O U T 4 0 Y E A R S R / OSHIVAJINAGAR DAVANGERE - 577007

15. SRI B H SATISH S/O LATE HALAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O H NO. 401/17 4TH MAIN,6TH CROSS S S LAYOUT, "B" BLOCK DAVANAGERE - 577007

16. SRI SHABIR SAB S/O ABDUL SATTAR SAB AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS SHIVAPRAKASHMOTORS R/O BILICHODU JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577553



17. SRI S NASIR S/O ABDUL SATTAR SAB AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SHIVAPRAKASH MOTORSR/O BILICHODU JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577553

18. SRI M R SIDDESH S/O LATE REVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS PROP: REPUBLICMOTORS R/O SIRIGERE CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT - 577541

19. SRI M R SHIVAPRAKASH S/O LATE M REVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PROP :REPUBLIC MOTORS R/O SIRIGERE CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT - 577541

20. SRI SHIVAMURTHY S/O CHANDRASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BUS OWNERR/O AZAJ FLOUR MILLS ROAD B D ROAD CHITRADURGA - 577501

21. SRI MURGESH S/O CHANDRASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BUS OWNER R/OAZAJ FLOUR MILLS ROAD B D ROAD CHITRADURGA - 577501

2 2 . S R I B D M A L L I K A R J U N S / O B M D O D D A N N A A G E D A B O U T 5 8 Y E A R S R / OMOLAKALMURU CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577535

23. SRI S V MANJUNATH S/O S M VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SUMALATHA MOTORSERVICE R/O HOUSING BOARD COLONY,CHITRADURGA - 577505

24. SRI MANOHAR SA LADWA S/O NAGOSA LADWA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS HANUMANTRANSPORT SERVICES R/O LADEA STREET HARIHAR - 577601

25. SMT GANGA VIJAYAKUMAR W/O LATE VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARSJAGADEESH MOTOR SERVICE R/O P J EXTENSION, DAVANGERE - 577010.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M SBUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY TTMC BUILDING, KH ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DAVANGERE - 577001

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS SECRETARY CHITRADURGA -577501

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS SECRETARY BELLARY HOSPETREGION BELLARY - 583101



6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-5;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR -6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THERESPONDENT UNIVERSITY TO APPROVE THE ADMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONERS 2 & 3AND ISSUED THEM THE ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-15 TOTHE B.SC.(NURSING) COURSE.

WP NOS. 38984-38986/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI S K PONNUSWAMY S/O SRI. KALIYAPPA GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARSPROPRIETOR, S.P.S. BUS SERVICE, NO.4/82, TANK ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571313 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS, DR. ABMEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001

2 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A LHANUMANTHAIAHA ROAD, BENGALURU-27 BY ITS MANAGING DIERCTOR . . .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATEWRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 39131-39142/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI D T MAHABALESH S/O LATE D. THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:KARNATAKA MOTORS, CHURCH EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA- 577501

2. SMT. VANITHA W/O LATE D.T.BHOGESH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: KARNATAKAMOTORS, CHURCH EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA -577501

3. SRI H.C. KOTARESH S/O GURUBASSAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP: SRI MOHINIMOTOR SERVICE, C.K PURA, CHITRADURGA -577501

4. SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE:C.H.H.NAYAK, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:G H A D R I L I N G E S H W A R A M O T O R S , B U R U J A N N A H A T T I , H O L A L K E R E R O A D ,CHITRADURGA- 577501



5. SMT.H.C.SHANTHAKUMARI W/O H.C. CHANDRAMOULI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROP: SE M S, C.K PURA, CHITRADURGA- 577501

6. SMT. GIRIJAMMA W/O LATE M.N. THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP. SRITHIPPESWAMY EXPRESS, CHURCH EXTENSION, BEHIND CHURCH, CHITRADURGA -577501.

7. SRIM.N. JAGADEESH S/O NIJALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PROP. SRITHIPPESWAMY EXPRESS CHURCH EXTENSION, BEHIND CHURCH, CHITRADURGA -577501.

8. SRI K.M.PRABHAKAR S/O LATE MAKUM NARAYANASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,PROP. SRINIVASA MOTOR SERVICE, CHITRADURGA- 577501.

9. SRI K.T. SHRISHYLA S/O K. THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PROP: JAYAPADMAMOTOR SERVICE, 3RD CROSS, JCR EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA 577501 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA- 577501BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H ROAD,, BENGALURU560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1& 2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-M.

W.P. NOS. 39232-39238/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI SYED JEELANI S/O NADE ALISAB AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS KALLUGODUMOULAMOLKALMUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577535

2. SRI K H RAMESH REDDY S/O K T HANUMANTHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP:READY EXPRESS SERVICE, T R NAGAR, CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577522

3. SRI SHAMANTHA KUMAR S V S/O S M VEERANNA AGED 45 YEARS SUMALATHA MOTORSSERVICE B G KERE, MOLKALMUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577535

4. SMT MUBEENA W/O SYED JEELANI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/A KALGOD MOHALLAMOLKALMURU - 577535 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT



5. SMT N T RUDRAMMA W/O R M UMAPATHI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS HIREHALLI,CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577522 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTI-STORYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU - 560001.

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNX-A TO THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. Nos. 39343-39347/2015 & 39348-39351/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. D.H. GURUPRASAD S/O HANUMATHAIAH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BUSOPERATOR SHRIRAMAPURA (POST) HOSADURGA - 577527 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

2. SRI M SIDAPPA S/O MAVEENAHALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP: S K TTRANSPORT BHEEMASAMUDRA - 577520 JAGALURU TALUK DAVANAGERE (DIST).

3. SRI MUJEER S/O ABDUL JABBAR SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BUS OPERATOR ASARMOHALLA CHITRADURGA - 577501

4. J R ZAFRULLA KHAN S/O LATE RASHEED KHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP: DADAEXPRESS 4TH CROSS, AZAD NAGAR NEAR WATER TANK CHITRADURGA - 577501

5. SRI H P SHEETAL PRASAD S/O PASHAWANATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BUS OPERATORBILCHODU - 577553 JAGALURU TALUK DAVANGERE (DIST)

6. SRI M S GANDHI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER M/S SRI DEV TRANSPORTNO. 734/1, KRISHNA ENGINEERING COMPLEX, OPP: OLD BUS STAND DAVANGERE - 577003... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGLAURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA - 577501 BY



ITS SECRETARY

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANGERE REGION KONDAJJI ROADDAVANAGERE - 577003 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FORR1-3;

SRI B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-J.

W.P. NOS. 39354-39358/2015 & 39359-39363/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. H.B. RUDRAMUNI S/O. H. BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROP:JAGATH JYOTIMOTORS, BELLARY MAIN ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577522 CHITRADURGA (DIST)

2. SRI H L JAYAKUMAR S/O LINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI EXPRESS,NAYAKANAHATTI-577536 CHALLAKERE (TALUK) CHITRADURGA(DIST)

3. SRI J P RAVISHANKAR S/O LATE P M PARMESHWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,PROP:MAHADEVI EXPRESS, NAYAKANAHATTI-577536 CHALLAKERE (TALUK)CHITRADURGA (DIST).

4. SRI H V NAGARAJ S/O VAJRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI EXPRESS,NAYAKANAHATTI-577522 CHALLAKERE (TALUK) CHITRADURGA (DIST).

5. SRI H N NEELAPPA S/O SRI NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:S M L MOTORSERVBICE, BHARAMASAGARA-577519 JAGALURU (TALUK) DAVANAGERE (DIST).

6. SMT R SARASWATHI W/O T RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI TRANSPORT, BHARAMASAGARA, DUGGAVARA (POST), CHALLAKERE(TALUK)-577522 CHITRADURGA (DIST)

7. SRI T RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O SHANTHAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI TRANSPORT, BHARAMASAGARA, DUGGAVARA (POST), CHALLAKERE(TALUK-577522 CHITRADURGA-(DIST).

8. SRI EKATH REDDY S/O T RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI TRANSPORT, BHARAMASAGARA, DUGGAVARA (POST), CHALLAKERE(TALUK)-577522 CHTIRADURGA-(DIST)



9. SRI GOVIN REDDY S/O T RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI TRANSPORT, BHARAMASAGARA, DUGGAVARA (POST) CHALLAKERE(TALUK)-577522 CHITRADURGA-(DIST)

10. SRI ASHWATH NARAYANA BABU S/O LATE LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, # 22, KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501 BYITS SECRETARY

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMAKURU REGION, REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE, TUMAKURU-572101 BY ITS SECRETARY

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI. B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-N.

W.P. NOS. 39364-39368/2015 & 39369-39373/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. N.B. SHADAKSHARAIAH S/O BASAVARAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP:JAYADEVA MOTORS, HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).

2. SRI D.H. GURUPRASAD, S/O HANUMANTHAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, SHRIRAMAPURA (POST), HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).

3. SMT SHASHIKALA W/O LATE N B RUDRAMUNNI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA(DIST)

4. SRI T P. RAJASHEKAR S/O LATE PANCHAKSAHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, PROP:KALLESHWARA MOTORS, TANDA (POST), HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).

5. SMT BHARAMBIKE W/O T.S. PANCHAKSHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, PROP:KALLESHWARA MOTORS, TANDA (POST) HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).



6. SRI R VENUGOPAL S/O LATE B V.RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S.R.EXPRESS, HOSADURGA-577 527, CHITRADURGA-(DIST).

7. SRI M.S. RANGANATH S/O SRI SANNARANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PROP:RANGANATHA MOTORS, MEDEHALLI ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501.

8. SRI DADAHAYATH S/O MAHABOOB JAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROP: VIJAYAMOTORS, KOBBARIPETE, HOSADURGA -577 527, CHITRADURGA-(DIST).

9. SRI K.R. KIRAN S/O SRI RAMESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, T.R.NAGAR, NEAR PARK, CHALLAKERE (TALUK)-577 522 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

10. SRI RAMESH REDDY S/O SRI HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUSO P E R A T O R , T . R . N A G A R , N E A R P A R K , C H A L L A K E R E ( T A L U K ) - 5 7 7 5 2 2 ,CHITRADURGA-(DIST).

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF , ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501,BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 &R2;

SRI B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-N.

W.P. NOS. 39639-39642/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI M ANIL S/O SRI MYLARAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS KODIMANCHANAHALLIVILLAGE CHICKBALLAPURA - 562101

2. SRI M KRISHNA MURTHY S/O LATE SRI N MUNI RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.5,CUBBONPET MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 002.

3. SMT PUTTAMANCHAMMA W/O SRI MADE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO. 777, 3RDCROSS KALLAHALLI, V V NAGARA, MANDYA - 571401



4. MR. ALLAH BAKASH S/O MR. G A AMANULLA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS NO. 2078, SANTHEGATE EXTENSION, M B ROAD, KOLAR - 563101 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJAGUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT , MULTISTORYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU - 560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATEWRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P NO. 39643/2015 BETWEEN MR S ABDUL BASHEER S/O LATE MR.SHEIK DAWOODSAHEB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S.NAZEERIA BUS SERVICE, NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE,GOWRIPET, KOLAR -563 101 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMETN ORDER BYISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER ORDIRECTION.

W.P. NOS. 39842-39843/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. R. PARIMALA W/O N K K P RAJA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BUS OPERATOR NO.40,CHIKKAHOLE DAM (SRIRAGAPURA) ATHIGULIPURA POST ARDHANAHALLI HOBLICHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK- 571 313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.



2. SMT S VENI W/O THANGAVELU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PROP: R.P.N. MOTORS NO.31/10,NO.6 PACHI COMPLEX, T.N.PURA ROAD, NAZARA BAD MYSORE- 570010.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE- 560001

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT NO.229, 2ND FLOOR 3RD STAGEMULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE- 560 001

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIEDBUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE- 560 001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY B M T C BUILDING K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE- 27 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. THE REGIONAL TRASNPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE -570001 REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN

6 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N K . H . R O A D ,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRCTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R5;

SRI. B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.

W.P. NOS. 39844-39848/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. N.K. PONNUSWAMY S/O KOLANDAIAH SWAMY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,PROPRIETOR: N.K.P.SERVICE, PALANIKUTTI GARDEN, DOLLIPURA, ATHIGULLAPURAPOST, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571313

2. SRI.VENKATASWAMY S/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.7/11, MAHADESHWARA,COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLEGAL-571313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

3. SRI.R.D.KARTHIKEYAN S/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR NO.7/11,MAHADESHWARA, COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLEGAL-571313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

4. SMT. N.PALANIYAMMAL W/O SRI.D.JAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUSO P E R A T O R M A K K A M O H A L L A , N O . 6 4 / 4 , G A L I P U R A E X T E N S I O N ,CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.



5. SRI.N.TIRUPATHI S/O NALLAPPA GOUNDAR, BUS OPERATOR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,MYSORE MAIN ROAD, SANTHEMARANAHALLI-571313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.


4. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BMTC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-27 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSORE-570001 REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN

6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K,H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R5;

SRI. B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.

W.P.NOS. 40107-40123/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. NIRMAL VAGEESH GOWDA, W/O LATE G S VAGESH GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, R/O MUKTHENAHALLI, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 217.

2. SRI N.M.J.B.ARADYA, S/O JAYADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, PROP: MALLIKARJUNAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O CHENNAGIRI ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 004.

3. SRI H C MAHESH, S/O CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O PALLAGATTE, JAGALURTALUK, DAVANAGERE-577 528.

4. SRI SUBHASH, S/O KOTRESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O KADABAKERE,HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-583 131.

5. SMT. GIRIJAMMA, W/O LATE G NANDIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/OKAMBATHAHALLI, HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-583 131.



6. SRI G M KUMARASWAMY, S/O MARULASIDDAIAH G S, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/OKAMBATHAHALLI, HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-583131.

7. SRI B G HABIBULLA, S/O ABDUL GAFFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROP: LAXMITRANSPORT, R/O NO.339/1, NARASARAJPET DAVANAGERE-577 005.

8. SRI M G PRAKASH RAO, S/O M R GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O DDEVARAJURS LAYOUT, "A" BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577 007 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI MG NARAYANA RAO, S/O M.R.GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D DEVARAJURSLAYOUT, "A" BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577 007.

9. SRI M G NARAYANA RAO, S/O M.R.GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O DDEVARAJURS LAYOUT, "A"BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577 007.

10. SRI S MANJUNATH, S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BANASHANKARI MOTORSERVICE, R/O KAMBATHHALLI, HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-583131.

11. SMT N S LALITHA, W/O SHIAYOGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NITTAVAHALLI,NEW EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577004.

12. SRI N S AMARESH, S/O LATE N A SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/ONO.209/2, 3RD MAIN, P.J EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 010.

13. SRI J VAMADEVA, S/O J CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BUS OWNER, R/OKOTTUR, KUDALIGI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 134.

14. SRI H V MAHARUDRA SWAMY, S/O VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 3RD CROSS,ANJENEYA BADAVANE, NITTUVALLI, DAVANAGERE-577 004.

15. SMT KAMALAMMA, W/O VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 3RD CROSS,ANJENEYA BADAVANE, NITTUVALLI, DAVANAGERE-577 004.

16. SRI. L. SATISH, S/O LINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PROP: PANCHALINGESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O SHIVANANJAPPA LAYOUT, HOSAHALLI EXTENSION, MANDYA-571406.

17. SRI H R GURUMURTHY, S/O H A RAJAGOPAL ACHAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PROP:VIJAYA TRAVELS, R/O ACHAR STREET (HOSPITAL ROAD,) HULIYAR, C N HALLI TALUK,TUMKUR DISTRICT-572218.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A. ANANDA SHETTY, ADVOCATE ) AND:



1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,DAVANAGERE - 577 001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MANDYA -571 401.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNX-A.

W.P.NOS.40124-40130/2015 BETWEEN

1. SRI MUZMILLA, S/O R. SHEIKH MEHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O DODDAPETTASTREET, MOLAKALMURU, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577535.

2. SMT GEETHA, W/O LATE MARULA SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP: LAXMITRANSPORT, R/O LAXMI NILAYA, MARUTINAGAR, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577504.

3. SRI K S NAGARAJ, S/O SHIVARUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, LAXMI TRANSPORT,R/O LAXMI NILAYA, MARUTINAGAR, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577504.

4. SMT JAYASHREE, W/O K C SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KALLESHWARATRANSPORT, R/O JAGALUR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577528.

5. SRI D S RUDRAMUNI, S/O SHIVANANDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KOTESWARAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O V P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577503.

6 . SRI M C PRAKASH, S/O CHANNABASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/OMARUTINAGAR, CHITRADURGA-577504.

7. SRI M N JAGADEESH, S/O M NIJALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, THIPPESWAMYEXPRESS, R/O CHURCH EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577509.



... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A., ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY TTMC BUIDLING KH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTORITY, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE-577001.

4 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y , R E P . B Y I T S S E C R E T A R Y ,CHITRADURGA-577501.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AG.A. FOR R1-R4;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUNGED NOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEX-A.

W.P.NOS.40148-40152/2015 & 40153-40154/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT D.M.VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O D.L SADASHIVA REDDY, AGE MAJOR, NO.607, 10THCROSS, JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK, BENGALURU- 560082.

2. SYED ANWAR, S/O LATE SYED UBEDULLA, AGE MAJOR, NAYAKANA ATTI, CHELLAKERETALUK, CHITRADURGA DIST-PIN 577522.

3 . S R I M . N R A J U , A G E 5 2 Y E A R S , S / O N A G R A J A P P A , S R I L A K S H M I E X P R E S S ,MEDAGINAGERE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DIST-PIN 577528.

4. SRI L.B. SHIVAKUMAR, AGE 54 YEARS, S/O L. BASAPPA, APSARA TRAVELS, CHANNAGIRI,DAVANAGERE DIST. -PIN 577213.

5. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR, AGE MAJOR, S/O ANNAPPA,, APSARA TRAVELS, CHANNAGIRI,DAVANAGERE DIST. -PIN 577213.

6. SRI C. RAMESH, AGE MAJOR, S/O SHAW MISTRY MALGI, APSARA TRAVELS,CHANNAGIRI, DAVANAGERE DIST.- PIN 577213.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.E.NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:



1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLLOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S BUILDING,BENGALURU-560001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT R-1DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-D.

W.P.NOS.40155-40167/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI B V NARAHARI, S/O VENKATAPPA, AGED 56 YEARS, MANJUNATH MOTORS, 1ST CROSS,GANDHI NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229,2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. B. PALAKSHIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DATED5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-D;




SRI RANGASWAMY S/O CHIKKARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NO. 12/66, RENUKANILAYA GANIGARA BEEDHI MAGADI-562120 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT ... PETITIONER(BY SRI NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR BEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) BANGALORE RURAL, B.D.A COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROAD,BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION / ORDER THEPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD:05.08.2015 BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE-E.

WP NOS. 40265-40269/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O M NARAYANASWAMY, 1ST CROSS,BASAVANAGUDI BLOCK, NANJANGUD, MYSURU DISTRICT.

2. SRI MANI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O NACHIMUTHU, PROPRIETOR S.S.M. MOTORS,NO.13/3, KUVEMPU EXTENSION, SATHI ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGAR, CHAMARAJANAGARDISTRICT.

3. SRI S.R. GOPAL AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O RANGASWAMY GOUNDER, INDUSTRIALAREA, MURUGAN WATER WORKS, KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

4. SMT MANONMANI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O R SRINIVASAN, NO.317, 13TH MAIN, 3RDCROSS, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU.

5. SRI HANUMANTHA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O NANJA NAIKA, NAGARLEVILLAGE & POST, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B GRAGHURAM, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT,MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.



E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIMORDER TO STAY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-J AND THEPETITIONERS MAY BE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SERVICE UNDER THEPERMIT IN QUESTION PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.

W.P.NOS.40270-40274/2015 & 40275-40279/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.S. RAGHUNATHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE S.KRISHNACHAR, NO.1449,K.P.NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, K.R.MOHALLA MYSURU.

2. SMT.K.USHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O Y.N.KRISHNA RAO, NO.1449, K.P.NAGAR, 4THCROSS, K.R.MOHALLA MYSURU.

3. SRI.N.JAYASHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O M.NARAYANASWAMY, NO.5343/2, 1STCROSS, BASAVANAGUDI BLOCK, NANJANGUD, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

4. SRI.K.R.SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE K.P.RANGAIAH, SRI CHAMUNDIMOTOR SERVICE, NO.77, 'H' BLOCK, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR,MYSURU-570022.

5. SRI.S.HEMANTH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O SHAMANNA SRI CHAMUNDIMOTOR SERVICE, NO.77, H BLOCK, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR,MYSURU-570022.

6. SRI.Y.N.KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE NARASINGA RAO, NO.1449,K.P.AGRAHARA, 4TH CROSS, K.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU.

7. SMT.B.SUNDARAMMA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O LATE Y.M.MAHADEVAPPA, NO.3,LINGAIAH COLONY THEO BALD ROAD, NAZARABAD, MYSURU.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B G RAGHURAM, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT,MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1;



SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-O AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.40281-40339/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. P. SEETHARAM, S/O T.PURADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,PRAKASHA MOTOR SERVICES, THIMMANAHALLI, C.N.HALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

2 . S R I . G . R A S W A T H A R E D D Y , S / O G . R A M I R E D D Y , A G E D A B O U T 5 0 Y E A R S ,BARAMASAGARA, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

3. SRI.G.R. PRATHAB REDDY, S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, VIDYASAGARA, CHITHRADURGA.

4. SRI.T.R.R. MANJUNATH, S/O LATE N.R. REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, "HONNU",BEHIND ST.MARYS SCHOOL, GANDHINAGAR, TUMKUR-572101.

5. SRI.N.MANJUNATHA REDDY, S/O NAGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, J.C.R.EXTENSION, III CROSS, CHITHRADURGA.

6. SRI.H.JAGADEESHA REDDY, S/O H.HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, DONEHALLI POST, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

7. SRI.A. SANMATHY KUMAR, S/O D.AMBANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, SRI MAHADEVAMOTORS, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, MADAKERI NAGAR, CHALLAKERE, CHITHRADURGA.

8. SRI.D. AMBANNA, S/O LATE K.T.DHARNENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SRIMAHADEVI MOTORS, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, MADAKERI NAGAR, CHALLAKERE,CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.

9. SRI.D.VIJAYENDRA, S/O LATE K.T. DHARNENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,SRI.MAHADEVI MOTORS, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, MADAKERI NAGAR, CHALLAKERE,CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

10. MR.DADA KHALANDAR, S/O ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,MOLAKALMURU, CHITHRADURGA.

1 1 . M R . S Y E D A N W A R , S / O L A T E S A Y E D O B E D U L L A , A G E D A B O U T 5 5 Y E A R S ,NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.



12. SRI.GURURAJ B.RAO, S/O B.K.BALAKRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,PROPRIETOR, MAHADEVA MOTOR SERVICE, P.B.ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

13. SRI.K.RAJANNA SETTY, S/O KUMARA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BELAGATTA,CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.

14. MR.MOHAMED HYATH, S/O MOHAMED SANAULLA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RAMDASCOMPOUND, GOPALAPURA ROAD, CHITHRADURGA.

15. SRI.H.V. NAGARAJ, S/O H.M. VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, GANDHINAGAR,CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

16. SRI.B.K. THIPPESWAMY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, KELAKOTE,CHITHRADURGA.

17. SMT.T.N. GEETHALAKSHMI, C/O T.B. NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,SRINIVASA MOTOR SERVICE, C.K.PURA, CHITHRADURGA.

18. SRI.S.N.KENCHANNA, S/O LATE NARASIMHA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,ANEPALYA, C.N.HALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

19. SMT.NIRMALA VAGESH GOWDA, W/O VAGESH GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,MUKTENAHALLI, HONNALI TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

20. SRI.G.C. SHIVAMURTY, S/O R.K. CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,KODIRANGAVVANNA HALLI BARAMASAGARA POST, CHITHRADURGA TALUK & DIST.

2 1 . S R I . G . S . S U D H E E P , S / O G . C . S H I V A M U R T H Y , A G E D A B O U T 3 8 Y E A R S ,SHIVAKUMARASWAMY EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

22. SRI.G.C. MANJUNATH, S/O LATE R.K. CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SRIG E E T H A N J A N E Y A M O T O R S , M . C . C . ' A ' B L O C K , N O . 8 6 0 / 2 0 , 1 S T M A I N ,SHIVAKUMARASWAMY EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

2 3 . S M T . K . C . J A Y A M M A , W / O G . C . S H I V A M U R T H Y , A G E D A B O U T 5 5 Y E A R S ,KODIRANGAVVANA HALLI, BARAMASAGARA, CHITHRADURGA TALUK & DIST.

24. SRI V.H. KUMAR, S/O R.K. CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.3245, M.C.C.III BLOCK, 11TH MAIN, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

25. SRI RAMESH BABU, S/O M.K. PANI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.139, II CROSS,P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 001.



26. MR.NAZRATH KHAN, S/O MAQBUL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, FIRST MAIN, IIICROSS, P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

27. SRI G.R. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O G.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,S.T.R.M.S., MADIVALARA STREET, CHANNAGIRI, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

28. SMT.E.D. KUSUMA, C/O SRI E.V.DHANYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, VAJRAKUNJA, VIJAY MOTOR SERVICE, HOSADURGA, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.

29. SRI.E.V. DHANYA KUMAR, S/O LATE ELEKAL VAJRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, VIJAYMOTOR SERVICE, HOSADURGA, CHITHRADURGA DISTIRCT.

30. SMT. E.V. JYOTHI C/O E.D. ANANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, VIJAY MOTORSERVICE, HOSADURGA, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.

31. SRI.E.D. ANANTHARAJU, S/O E.V. DHANYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, VIJAYMOTOR SERVICE, HOSADURGA, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT.

32. MR.HABIBULLA, S/O ABDUL GHAFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,P.LAKSHMI TRANSPORT, KOBRIPET, HOSADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

33. SRI.C. RAMESH, S/O ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, S.T.R.M.S.T.B.ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

34. SRI.J.ESHWARAPPA, S/O SHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, II MAIN, VENKATESHNAGAR, SHIMOGA-577 201.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H.ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE-572 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMKUR-572 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURG-577 501, BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA 571 401, BY ITS SECRETARY.



... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1, R3-R6;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.40340-40354/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. B.V. SHARADA, W/O C.R. MOHAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,# 24-C4, BANAJIGA STREET, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

2. SRI. N. SURESH, S/O ALTE NAGESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROP: SRI GANESHABUS SERVICE, 1ST CROSS, BHARAHMAMBA EXTENSION, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

3. SRI. R. RAJANNA, S/O LATE RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,#102, PWD COLONY, BEHIND VHP SCHOOL, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

4. SRI. RAMSWAMY, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, YEDIYURUFARM HOUSE, MANGALA (POST), CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

5. SRI. G.NATRAJ, S/O. LATE S.V. GOPALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, #20/180, 2ND CROSS, BANAJIGA STREET, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

6. SRI. MURLIKRISHNA, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA IYER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,# 2 / 2 2 9 , 1 S T C R O S S , V A R D H A R A J A P U R A , N E A R K A R M A R I Y A M M A T E M P L E ,CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

7. SRI. SYED ZAMEER, S/O SYED KHASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP: SVMS,D I N A H A L L I ( P O S T ) , R A M A P U R A ( H O B L I ) , K O L L E G A L L A ( T A L U K ) - 5 7 1 4 4 0 .CHAMARAJANAGARA (DIST).

8. SMT. GAYATHRI, W/O GOPAL .R, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, PWD COLONY,COURT ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

9. SRI. R. GOPAL, S/O LATE RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, PWDCOLONY,COURT ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

10. SRI.S. NANDISHA, S/O V. SHANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,P.G.PALYA (POST), CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

11. SRI. R. SRINIVAS, S/O G. RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, 6THCROSS, BHRAMBHARAMBA EXTENSION, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.



12. SRI. K.M. ANWAR BASHA, S/O LATE KHADER MOHIDEEN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, #7/161 , OLD KURUBARA STREET, KOLLEGALLA (TALUK)-571 440,CHAMARAJANAGARA (DIST).

13. SRI. B. ILIYARAJA, S/O E.C. BALASUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP: SCP BUSSERVICE, #16/18, 2ND FLOOR, OPP: TO INDIAN OIL BANK, NANJANAGUD ROAD,CHAARAJANAGARA-571 313.

14. SRI.SYED AZIZ ULLA, S/O SYED NOOR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, BEHINDKSRTC BUS STAND, K.N. MOHOLLA, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

15. SRI. B. PRABHU, S/O BALASUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,#1229, NEAR GIRLS HOSTEL, PWD COLONY, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA B.R., ADVOCATE) AND


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORTITY, CHAMARAJANAGARA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGLAURU-560027. BY IS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AG.A., FOR R1 & R2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THERECORDS; QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-T.

W.P.NOS. 40355-40365/2015 & W.P.NOS. 40572-40576/2015 & W.P.NOS. 40577- 40581/2015BETWEEN:

1. SMT. P. SUJATA, W/O B A LINGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROP: S R EXPRESS,HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA- 577 501.

2. SRI O NAGENDRAIAH, S/O OBALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP: SLNS MOTORS,GOPUNAHALLI, CHALLAKERE- 577 522, CHITRADURGA (DIST).

3. SRI G N NARASIMHASWAMY , S/O O NAGENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, VINAYAKA EXTENSION, HOSADURGA- 577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).



4. SRI G N THIPPESWAMY, S/O O NAGENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,VINAYAKA EXTENSION, HOSADURGA- 577 527, CHITRADURGA (DIST).

5. SRI B A LINGAREDDY, S/O LATE ANANTH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PROP: S REXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA -577 501.

6. SRI B S CHIDANAND REDDY, S/O LATE SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, PROP:S R EXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA -577 501.

7. SRI B C SUHAS, S/O SRI B S CHIDANAND REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, PROP: S REXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA 577 501.

8. SMT B S PUSHPALATHA, W/O SRI B S CHIDANAND REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,PROP: S R EXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA 577 501.

9. SMT T KRISHNAMMA, W/O LATE B ANANTH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, PROP: S REXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA 577 501.

10. SRI JAYAPRAKASH, S/O SRI HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S REXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA 577 501.

11. SRI MANJUNATH SHETTY, S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,BUS OPERATOR, C K PURA EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA 577 501.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA 577 501,BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU 560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AG.A., FOR R1 & R2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-P.

W.P.NOS.40367-40368/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SRI. A. SHIVAKUMAR, S/O ANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT 12/11, 4TH LINK MAINROAD, MADIVALA, BENGALURU-560068.

2. SRI P MURUGEHAN, S/O A PALANI GOUNDER, AGED 52 YEARS, R/A 12/11, 4TH LINK MAINROAD, MADIVALA, BENGALURU-560068.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESH R., ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDINGS, I FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, BMTC COMPLEX,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 & R2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANN-C.

W.P.NOS.40369-40371/2015 BETWEEN SRI. T. MYLSWAMY, S/O S. THANGAVEL, AGEDA B O U T 3 9 Y E A R S , R / A S R I M Y L S W A M Y B U S S E R V I C E , P A T E L N A G A R , N E A RVENKATESWARA TEMPLE, BELLARY, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SRI M.ANBALAGAN, S/O P MANI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A PATEL NAGAR, NEARVENKATESWARA TEMPLE, BELLARY-583101.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH R., ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVENMENT ,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, TTMCBUILDINGS, I FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, BMTC COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITSSECRETARY.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.



... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 & R2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNX-D TO THE ABOVE WRIT PETITIONS BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.40417-40431/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K N DEVENDRANATH, S/O SRI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,"VARADARAJA NILAYA", K K PET, SIDLAGHATTA, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN:562105.

2. SRI RAMESH, S/O SRI MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, NO.67, DODDAGUBBI POST,HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BYRATTI, BENGALURU DISTRICT PIN:560049.

3. MR ABDUL REHAMAN, S/O MR. ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, "SAILANISHANMAKHAN", O P O ROAD, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN:562114.

4. MR ABDUL HAMEED, S/O MR. ABUDL AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, "SAILANISHANMAKHAN", O P O ROAD, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562114.

5. MR MOHAMMED IRSHAD, S/O MR. T MOHAMMED BASHEER, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,NO.842, POST OFFICE ROAD, GORIPET, KOLAR-563101.

6. SRI SHANKARANARAYANA REDDY, S/O SRI CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,YEDAVANAHALLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562107.

7. SRI N S RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE H SRIKANTAIAH, MAJOR BY AGE , NO.178,TEACHERS COLONY, CHANDAPURA CIRCLE, ANEKAL ROAD, BENGALURU RURALDISTRICT, PIN:560081.

8. SRI N S PRABHU, S/O LATE SRI. H. SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NERALURVILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562106.

9. SRI Y S MANJUNATH, S/O SRI Y C SHANKARANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,YEDAVANAHALLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN : 562106.

10. SRI ASHWATHANARAYANA REDDY, S/O SRI CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,YEDAVANAHALLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562106.

11. SRI Y L SRIKANTAN, S/O LATE SRI Y S LAKSHMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.24,SECOND CROSS, SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION, MALLEWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.




1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A LHANUMANTAHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA, FOR R1 ;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THERECORDS PERTAINING TO THE GOVT. ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-D AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVT. ORDER.

W.P.NOS.40496-40500/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. A.M. KUMAR, W/O. SRI. MUTTUSWAMY GOUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:R.P.N. MOTORS, NO.31/10, ROOM NO.6, SWATHI COMPLEX, T.N. PURA ROAD, NAZARABAD,MYSORE-570 010.

2. SRI. MASOOD AHMED, S/O. LATE. ABDUL MAJID, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, GARGESHWARI, T.N. PURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570 010.

3. SRI. MOHAMMED YOUNUS SALIM, S/O. SRI. MASOOD AHMED, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,BUS OPERATOR, GARGESHWARI, T.N. PURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT- 570 010.

4. SRI. S.A. SAMIULLA SHERIEF, S/O. S.M. HAJI AHMED SHERIEF, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,VYASARAJAPURA, T.N.PURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570 010. REPRESENTED BY THEG.P.A. HOLDER, HAJI S.M.AHMED SHARIFF.

5. SRI. C.V. JAYANTH, S/O. SRI. VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, THIRUMALEMEDICALS, LINGADALLI POST, PAVAGADA TALUK-561 202, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A. S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RDSTAGE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.



3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.M.T.C., BUILDING, K.H. ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSORE-570 001. REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN.

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.H. ROAD, OPP: D.C. OFFICE, TUMKUR-570001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

6 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH AGA., FOR R1 TO R5;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 BENGALURU AS PER ANNX-L;

W.P.NOs.40904-40918/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K. SHIVALINGU, S/O LATE SRI KENCHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.36,SATHYA MARG, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU-570 011.

2. SMT.S. SUJATHA, W/O SRI K.SHIVALINGU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.36, SATHYAMARG, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU-570 011.

3. SRI.B. PRASANNA KUMAR, S/O LATE SRI BORAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, GOWRIPURA,SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT PIN-571 438.

4. SMT.S. SHRUTHI, D/O SRI K.SHIVALINGU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO.36, SATHYAMARG, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU-570 011.

5. SRI.K.PUTTEGOWDA, S/O LATE SRI KENCHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO.465/1,K.N. AGRAHARA, K.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 024.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.




... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA, FOR R1;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-DAND QUAHS THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.

WP NOS. 40954-40955/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. SALEEM KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGE: 56 YEARS, PROP: K.K TRAVELS, VELLIAMMAN KOIL STREET, VIVEKNAGARA, BANGALORE 560047

2. SRI HAFEEZ KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGE: 59 YEARS, PROP: K.K TRAVELS, # 1135,TATE LANE, RICHMOND ROAD, ASHOK NAGARA, BANGALORE 560025 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI. SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H ROAD, BENGALURU530027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH,.AGA FOR R1& 2;

SRI. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THER-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G.

W.P.NOS.40956-40976/2015 BETWEEN

1. SRI. H.N. NEELAPPA, S/O SRI.NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S.M.L. MOTORSERVICE, BHARAMASAGARA-577519, JAGALURU (TALUK), DAVANAGERE (DISTRICT).

2. SRI.M.VAGEESH, S/O SRI.PARVATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP: S.M.L.MOTORSERVICE, BHARAMASAGARA-577519 , JAGALURU (TALUK), DAVANAGERE (DISTRICT).

3. SMT.SRI.DEVI, W/O SRI.H.N.KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S.M.L.MOTORSERVICE, BHARAMASAGARA-577519, JAGALURU (TALUK), DAVANAGERE (DISTRICT).



4. SRI.C.AKMAL, S/O SRI.ABDUL KAREEM SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,N.R.PET, DAVANAGERE-577502.

5. SMT.GAURAMMA, W/O SRI.H.N.PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S.M.L.MOTORSERVICE, BHARAMASAGARA-577519, JAGALURU (TALUK), DAVANAGERE (DISTRICT).

6. SRI.C.V.JAYANTH, S/O SRI.C.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, C/O THIRUMALA MEDICALS, LINGADAHALLI (POST), PAVAGADA-561202,TUMAKURU (DISTRICT).

7. SRI.SHIVASHANKARA, S/O SRI.PURANDARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:HANUMAN TRANSPORT, KALIDASANAGARA, SIRA-572137, TUMAKURU (DISTRICT).

8. C.MOHAMMED IRFANULLA SHARIFF, S/O C.SHAIK AMEER SAB, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,PROP: S.B.TRANSPORT ALI MOHALLA CHITRADURGA-577501.

9. SRI.D.M.MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, PROP: KARNATAKA MOTORS, JCREXTENSION,, CHITRADURGA-577501.

10. SMT.K.R.SOUWMYA, W/O SRI.K.G.RAVISHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:JAYAPADMA MOTORS, JCR EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501.

11. SRI.M.G.THIPPESWAMY, S/O SRI.GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PROP:THIPPESWAMY TRANSPORT, JCR EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501.

12. SRI.N.KIRAN KUMAR, S/O SRI.SATISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROP:THIRUMALA MOTORS, KELOGOTE, CHITRADURGA-577501.

13. SRI.E.V.DHANYAKUMAR, S/O E.VAJRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, PROP: VIJAYAMOTOR SERVICE, VIJAYANAGARA, HOSADURGA-577527, CHITRADURGA (DISTRICT).

14. SRI.S.M.CHANABASSAIAH, S/O MARULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP: SKMVIJAYA MOTOR, SANTHEPETE, HOSADURGA-577527, CHITRADURGA (DISTRICT).

15. SRI.S.R.HANUMATHA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, PROP:MAHADEVI EXPRESS, JAIN COLONY, MEDEHALLI ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501.

16. SMT.BALKHIS BANU, W/O SRI.MOHAMMED ZAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,PROP: SNSMS, OPPOSITE CANARA BANK, NAYAKANAHATTI-577536, CHALLAKERE (TALUK)CHITRADURGA (DISTRICT).

17. SRI.S.M.SHIVAKUMAR, S/O LATE S.B.



AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: S.K.M.VIJAYA MOTORS, HULIYAR ROAD, OPP: VRL OFFICE,HOSADURGA-577527 CHITRADURGA (DISTRICT).

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577003, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501,BY ITS SECRETARY.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRERSH, AGA., FOR R1-R3;

SRI. B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-W.

W.P.NOS.41016-41017/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. S. MANOHAR, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SANDHYA TOURS &TRAVELS, # 21/14, T S P ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560002.

2. SRI M SHARATH, S/O SRI.S. MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, SANDHYA TOURS &TRAVELS, # 21/14, T.S.P.ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560002.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C NARASIMHACHAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT ,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) # 229, II FLOOR, III STAGE,M S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.



4. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANGALORE METROPOLITIAN, TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-C.

W.P.NOS.41055-41080/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. M.V. VASANTHAMMA, D/O SRI M V VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PETEBEEDHI, MALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 430.

2. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O SRI CHENNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,HALUVAGILU, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN:572 130.

3. SMT. C PARAMESHWARI, W/O SRI M CHEZHIYAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, "DINESHILLAM", 4TH CROSS, GEETHA ROAD, ROBERTSONPET, K.G.F., PIN: 563 122.

4. SRI K VAJRE GOWDA, S/O LATE SRI M KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,KAGGALIPURA, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, PIN:571 124.

4. SMT. K C GAYATHRI, W/O SRI VAJRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.324, 9THMAIN, NEAR VINAYAKA TEMPLE, HALANAHALLI, MYSURU-570 001.

5 . S R I K M M A N J U N A T H , S / O S R I M A N C H E G O W D A , A G E D A B O U T 3 8 Y E A R S ,KAGGALIPURA, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, PIN:571 124.

6 . SRI K NAGENDRA, S/O LATE SRI M KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,KAGGALIPURA, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, PIN:571 124.

7. SRI SIDDARAMU, S/O LATE SRI M KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, KAGGALIPURA,T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, PIN:571 124.

8. SRI R NARAYANASWAMAPPA, S/O SRI A N RAMABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,NO.107, "CHENNAKESHAVANILAYA", ASHOKNAGAR, SECOND CROSS, VIJAYAPURA,DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN:562 135.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.





SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NO.41082/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI. S. ABHISHEK, S/O SRI M V SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, SRIUDAYARANGA MOTOR SERVICE, PETE MALAVALLI, MANDYA-571430.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION , KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R1;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.41115-41117/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. A.R.SHIVASHANKAR, S/O LATE A S RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, PROP:GAJANANA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O ARAKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYADISTRICT-571415.

2. SMT JAYAMMA, W/O LATE A.S.BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, PROP: GAJANANAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O ARAKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571415.

REPD. BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI.A.R.SHIVASHANKAR, S/O LATE A.S.RAMEGOWDA, AGEDABOUT 51 YEARS, PROP: GAJANAN MOTOR SERVICE, R/O ARAKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA



TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571415.

3. SRI.S.R.GIRISH , S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: MADHURI MOTORSERVICE, R/O SHIVAGANGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577110.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A AND SRI RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MANDYA-571401.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SHIMOGA-577202.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R1-R3;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FORRELEVANT RECORDS, QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BYTHE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

W.P.NOS.41138-41139/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. E. SRINIVASAN, S/O ILIYAR CHETTIAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,MODEL HOUSE, NO.2 1ST CROSS,7TH MAIN, GOKULAM, MYSORE.

2. SMT. R. SUDHA, W/O S. RAJU, MADARI MANE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.2, 1ST CROSS,7TH MAIN, GOKULAM 3RD STAGE, MYSORE.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE -560001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSORE- 570001, REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN.



4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE 560027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R1-R3;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G.


SMT. YASODHA, W/O MARISAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX, S V S BUSSERVICE, SIDDAGANGA EXTENSION, TUMKUR-572101 .

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.B.NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA), BANGALORE RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THENOTIFICATION/ORDER THE PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.

W.P.NO.41233/2015 BETWEEN SRI. K. HEMACHANDRA MUDALIYAR, S/O.LATEKUPPASWAMY MUDALIYAR, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, PROP:VINAYAKA TRANSPORT,THYAMAGONDLU TOWN, NELAMANGALA TALUK-562132, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.S. PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.




3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.

W.P. Nos. 41330-41340/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI G V LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O SRI VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.72, 17THCROSS 19TH 'A' MAIN, 5TH PHASE J P NAGAR, BENGALURU PIN: 560079

2. SRI C ANANDAKUMAR S/O SRI J V CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARSCHOWDESHWARI NILAYA KAMAKSHI LAYOUT V V ROAD, GOTTIGERE BANNERGHATTABENGALURU- 560 083.

3. SRI P NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O SRI PUTTANARASIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NO.14,MIRZA ROAD ANEKAL, BENGALURU PIN: 562 106

4. SRI G GOVINDARAJU S/O SRI GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.147/9,ANANTHARAMAIAH COMPOUND, CHAMARAJAPET BENGALURU - 560018

5. SRI K P LAVA S/O SRI PUTTALINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS FEROZ FARM, IJOORPOST RAMANAGARA - 571 511

6. MR. MOHAMMED MUNEER AHMED S/O MR B A GAFOOR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARSSHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560027

7. MR. AZMATHULLA KHAN S/O MR BASHEER AHMED KHAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS NO.13,8TH CROSS I-BLOCK, SOMESHWARANAGAR JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU- 560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY



SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P. NOS. 41482-41505/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI T.R. NAGAPRASAD S/O LATE N R REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OPP: RAILWAYSTATION, RENUKA NILAYA, TUMKUR-572101.

2. SMT. UJWALA PRASAD W/O T R NAGAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OPP: RAILWAYSTATION, RENUKA NILAYA TUMKUR-572101

3. SRI N M AIJAZ BASHA S/O S ABDUL MUNAFF, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, M S TRANSPORT,NAYAKANAHATTI POST, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT

4. SRI K GOPAL S/O KALIAPPA GOUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S V T BUS SERVICE,SOMWARPET, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313

5. SRI N D SIDDAPPA S/O DODDABORE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO.544,PALAHALLI VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK-571438

6. SRI K JAYARAM S/O BUNDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.1172, II CROSS ROAD,CHAMUNDESWARI NAGAR, MANDYA-571401

7. SRI M L GUNAPPA S/O LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, MOTTANAHALLI, MALAVALLITALUK-571430

8. SRI RAMAPRAKASH S/O V.P. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KUVEMPUEXTENSION, SATHI ROAD, CHAMARAJANGAR-57131

9. SMT L RAJAMMA C/O VASUDEVA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.258, SRIRAMAROAD, PORT MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001

10. SMT INDU SRINIVAS C/O SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DOOR NO.2664, VALMIKIROAD, ONTIKOPPA MYSORE-570001

11. SRI N V RAMANANDA S/O N C VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.42, 7TH MAIN,YADAVAGIRI, MYSORE-570001

12. SRI H TEJA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS C/O SIDDEGOWDA, NO.1172, CHAMUNDESWARINAGAR, MANDYA-571401



13. SRI THAILUR VITTAL MURTHY S/O LATE N CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,NO.654/1, B B GARDEN ROAD, MYSORE.

14. SRI N MURALI S/O CHANASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, C/O SRIDHAR, RAMPURA,MOLAKALMURU TALUK, CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.NAGARAJA HB, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT TRANSPORTD E P A R T M E N T , M U L T I S T O R E Y E D B U I L I D N G S , D R . A M B E D K A R V E E D H I ,BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION , SHANTHINAGAR, K HRAOD, BANGALORE-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE-570001 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR-572101 BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITHRADURGA-577501 BY ITS SECRETARY

6. REGIONAL TANSPORT AUTHORITY MANDYA-571401 BY ITS SECRETARY

7. KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027.

8. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGARA, BY ITS SECRETARY-581 453.

9 . REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL, KORAMANGALABANGALORE-560034.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1, R-3 TO R-9;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIMORDER TO STAY THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-E ANDFURTHER PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THEIR SERVICES AS PERTHEIR PERMITS.

W.P. NOS. 41523-41524/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. Y.N. KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE NARASINGA RAO NO. 1449, K PAGRAHARA 4TH CROSS, K R MOHALLA MYSURU.



2. SRI M SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O MAHADEVAPPA MAHADESHWARANILAYA OPP: TALUK OFFICE T NARASIPURA TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B G RAGHURAM, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTMULTI STORIED BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSURU REGION MYSURU - 570 001 REP. BYITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU - 560 027 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-F AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.

W.P. NO. 41614/2015 BETWEEN:

SMT. K.J.NIRMALA W/O LATE K G DAYANANDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS PROP: S N MOTORSERVICE LIONS BHAVAN ROAD DODDABALLAPUR BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIEDBUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1ST FLOOR, B M T C COMPLEX K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEUNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DT.5.8.2015 AS PERANNX-E.



WP NOS. 41615-41617/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.R.M.JAYAPPA S/O.LATE R.MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PROP: SHIVATRANSPORT, AJIHALLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT:577001.

2. SMT S KUSUMA W/O.R.M.JAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:SHIVA TRANSPORTS,AJJIHALLI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT:577001.

3. SRI T V DAYANANDA S/O.LATE.T.VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, PROP: SRISHAILAMOTOR SERVICE, DOOR NO.2598, LAKSHMI BAZZAR, CHITRADURGA-577501.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.


3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, B.M.T.C. COMPLEX,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY & REGISTERING AUTHORITY, SOWLANGAROAD, OPP:D.C.OFFICE, SHIMOGA-577201.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-4;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-G.

W.P. NOS. 41856-41860/2015 & W.P.NOS. 42035- 42039/2015 & W.P.NOS.42040-42042/2015 &W.P.NOS. 42043-42047/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. K. R. RAMESH S/O.SRI RAJA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, LAVAKUSHANAGAR, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560068.

2. SRI K R SRINIVASA REDDY S/O.SRI RAJA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,LAVAKUSHA NAGAR, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560068.



3. SRI K R SOMASHEKARA REDDY S/O.SRI RAJA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,LAVAKUSHA NAGAR, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560068.

4. SRI H R NAGARAJ S/O.LATE SRI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, VIRUPASANDRA,CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT, PIN:571501.

5. SRI M PRAKASHA RAO S/O.LATE SRI N.MUNI RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.5,CUBBONPET MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560002.

6. MR. SYED IMRAN PASHA S/O.M.SYED ILIYAS, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,FRIENDS BUS SERVICE, M.G.ROAD, CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,PIN:563125.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 41876-41888/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI A C MANJUNATHA S/O CHANNA BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT 42/43,A.V.ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002 REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER, SRI.M.GANESH,S/O R. MADHESWARAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT, C/O VENUGOPAL, 11/12, 4TH MAINROAD, MADIWALA, NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560068.

2. SRI M S GANDHIRAJ S/O SUBRAMANI, AGED 52 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/SSRIDEVI TRANSPORTS, C/O VENUGOPAL, 11/12, 4TH MAIN ROAD, MADIWALA, NEWEXTENSION, BENGALURU-560068 REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER, SRI.M.GANESH, S/OR.MADHESWARAN, AGED 54 YERS, R/A, C/O VENUGOPAL, 11/12, 4THMAIN ROAD,MADIWALA, NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560068.



3. SMT BHUVANESHWARI W/O SUBRAMANI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/A, 642, 3 VIJAYANAGAR,GANDHIPURAM, WHITE FIELD POST, BENGALURU-560066.

4. SRI ER. K KUMARAGURUPPARAN S/OK.K.A. KANDASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/A,12/11, 4TH MAIN, LINK ROAD, MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560068.

5. SRI MUNEER KHAN S/O BABA SAB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A. NO.31/B, 4TH CROSS,LALJI NAGAR, LAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU-560027.

6. SRI K A N MURTHY S/O A.V.M. KRISHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A, BALAJI NIVAS,ASHWATH KATTA ROAD, V.V.PURAM, BEGNALURU-56004.

7. SRI S K NALLUSAMY S/O P.KALLIYAPPAN, AGED 40 YEARS, R/AT 13/20, I FLOOR, KSVNILAYA BUILDINGS, KALASIPALYAM NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560002.

8. K R RAJAKUMAR S/O RAMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/A, NO.20, ABBAIAHYAPPALAYOUT, N.S.PALYA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560076.

9. SRI S RAMESH S/O SEENAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/A, MUNIYAPPA LAYOUT, NO.7/165,NEAR LAKSHMI TALKIES, BIDAREGERE ROAD, ANEKAL, BENGALURU DISTRICT -562106.

10. SRI A SHIVAKUMAR S/O ANJAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/A, 12/11, 4TH LINK MAIN ROAD,MADIVALA, BENGALURU-560068.

11. SRI SYED YOUNUS S/O SYED ABDUL, AGED 54 YEARS, R/A, NO.13/B, LALJINAGAR,LAKKASNADRA, BEGNALURU-560027.

12. SRI J VAMADEVA S/O CHENNABASAPPA, AGED 45 YEARS, R/A NEAR KOTRESWARATEMPLE, KOTTUR, KODLIGI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT 583134.

13. SRI A VENUGOPAL S/O N. ANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/A, NO.12/11, 4TH LINKMAIN ROAD, MADIWALA, BENGALURU-560068.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESH R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDINGS, I FLOOR "A"BLOCK, BMTC COMPLEX, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITSSECRETARY.



3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU (RURAL) KORAMANGALA BDACOMPLEX, BENGALURU-560034. BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, TURUVANURROAD, CHITRADURGA-577501. BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K,H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNX-A TO THE ABOVE WRIT PETITIONS BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. NO. 41893/2015 BETWEEN:

M/S DURGAMBA MOTORS REPD. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI S SADANANDA CHATRAS/O LATE GOVINDA CHATRA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O HANGALUR KUNDPURA TALUK,UDUPI DISTRICT-576217 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A ANANDA SHETTY AND N. RAJASHEKAR,ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRASNPORT AUTHORITY REPD. BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMCBUILDING, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY , REPD. BY ITS SECRETARY , SOWLANGA ROAD,SHIMOGA -577202

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION , REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3;

SMT.SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONDATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

W.P. NOS. 41894-41898/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SMT H C VIJAYA W/O LATE H N CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:MAHABALESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O TARIKERE, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577228

2. SMT A SUBBARATHNAMMA W/O LATE A SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP:GAYATHRI MOTOR SERVICE, R/O CHITRADURGA-577503

3. SRI BALAKRISHNA RAO B K S/O KHANDOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,MAHADEVA MOTOR SERVICE, NO.55, 6TH CROSS, "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT,DAVANAGERE-577002

4. SRI RAGHUNATH SA LADWA S/O LATE NAGENDRA LADWA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/OLADWA STREET, HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577601 REPD. BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRINAGENDRA LADWA, S/O NARAYANA SA LADWA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O NO.363, 60FEET ROAD, NIJALINGAPPA BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577004.

5. SRI NARAYANA SA LADWA S/O NAGOSA LADWA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HANUMANMOTOR SERVICE, LADWA STREET, HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577601.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANDA SHETTY A, AND SRI. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.

2 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y , R E P . B Y I T S S E C R E T A R Y ,DAVANAGERE-577001.


4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANTRECORDS AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THEGOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

W.P. NOS. 42398-42399/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI MALAI MAHADESHWARA KSHETRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAHADESHWARABETTA, KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT, BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN: 571 490.




1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD:05.08.2015 MARKED UNDERANNEXURE-D AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OFCERTIORARI.

W.P. NOS. 42517-42521/2015 & 42522-42524/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI B G VENKATESH S/O M.P.GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SRI VENKATESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE, NO.9A, RACE COURSE ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560001.

2 . S R I B G M U R A L I D H A R S / O M . P . G A N G A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 5 2 Y E A R S , S R IVENKATESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, NO.9A, RACE COURSE ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR,BANGALORE-560001.

3. SRI B V VIKRAM S/O B.G.VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SRI VENKATESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE, NO.9A, RACE COURSE ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560001.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C V KUMAR ADVOCATE.) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027. REP:BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;



SMT. SHWETA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFTHE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-C.

W.P. NOS. 42625-42629/2015 & W.P.NOS.43118- 43119/2015 & W.P.NO.43122/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. NAGARATHNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O GUPALIYAPPA, NO.320/10, 29TH MAINROAD, B.T.M.LAYOUT, 8TH STAGE, BENGALURU-560068

2. SRI.G.NAGARAJAN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O GUPALIYAPPA NO.320/10, 29TH MAINROAD, BTM LAYOUT, 8TH STAGE, BANGALORE-560068.

3. KUMARI G GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, D/O GUPALIYAPPA NO.320/10, 29THMAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT, 8TH STAGE, BANGALORE-560068.

4. SMT.G.BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, D/O GUPALIYAPPA NO.320/10, 29TH MAINROAD, BTM LAYOUT, 8TH STAGE, BANGALORE-560068.

5. SRI.ANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O GUPALIYAPPA NO.320/10, 29TH MAIN ROAD,BTM LAYOUT, 8TH STAGE, BANGALORE-560068.

6. SRI.SUSIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O G.V.JAYARAM MURTHINILAYA,GOTTIGERE AND POST, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560083.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDANANJAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ (HEARING AUTHORITY) M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL BY ITS SECRETARY,B.D.A.COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R2 & R4;

SMT SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE AND SRI B.PALAKSHAIH, ADVOCATE FORR3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-1



DT.5.8.2015 AT ANNX-B.

W.P NOS. 42719-42723/2015 & W.P.NOS.42724- 42728/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI M.S. HALESH S/O MUGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS PROPRIETOR, SRI.SHIVASHANKAR MOTOR SERVICE, BUDHIHAL VILLAGE HOSPET POST, HARAPANAHALLITALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

2. SMT GANGA VIJAYAKUMAR W/O LATE K M VIJAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARSPROPRIETRIX NO. 256/1, 4TH RING ROAD P J EXTENSION DAVANAGERE-577002.

3. SMT. TANUJA PARISH W/O PARISH BABU NO. 103, 5TH CROSS CAMBRIDGE LAYOUTBANGALORE-560035.

4. SMT RAKHIYA PARVEEN W/O ZABIULLA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PROPRIETRIX BUSOPERATOR, HIRIYUR CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

5. SRI S MAHADEVASWAMY S/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS PROPRIETORMANJUNATHA BUS SERVICE HANUR, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

6. SRI K G NAGARAJ S/O LATE K S GUJJAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS PROPRIETOR, S V M SBUS KAGALAVADI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK & DIST

7. SRI C RAMESH S/O ANNAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS PROPRIETOR S T R M S, T BROAD, CHANNAGIRI DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

.... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H B NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR P1-P4 & P7;

SRI B.R. SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR P-5 & P-6) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROAD,BANGALORE-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE-577001 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT KORAMANGALABANGALORE-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313 BY ITS SECRETARY



6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA-577501 BY ITS SECRETARY ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 AND R3;

SMT SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P. NOS. 42794-42815/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. MANOHAR SALADWA S/O.LATE NAGOSA SALADWA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,PROP:HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE, OPPOSITE BUS STAND, P.B.ROAD, HARIHARA-577601.

DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

2. SRI I SALAM W/O SRI.KASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #96, MUSLIMSTREET, 1ST WARD ARSIKERE, HARAPANAHALLI-583131, DAVANAGERE (DIST).

3. SRI M B SIDDESH S/O. SRI.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROP:KASHIVISHWANATHA MOTORS, BADA, DAVANAGERE-577502.

4. SMT M T GIRIJAMMA W/O.LATE.M.N.THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP:SRITHIPPESWAMY EXPRESS, CHURCH EXTENSION, BEHIND CHURCH, CHITRADURGA-577501.

5. SRI M R BASAWANTHAPPA S/O.SRI.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,MUTUKDURU (POST) HOLALKERE-577526 CHITRADURGA (DIST).

6. SRI G SRINIVAS S/O. SRI.G.GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, C/ORAGHAVENDRA TYRES, A.G.ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577522.

7. SRI D BASAWARAJU S/O.SRI.DEVENDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROP:SKTMOTORS, DEVIKERE, (POST), JAGALURU-577528 DAVANAGERE (DIST)

8. SRI K S SHASHIDHAR S/O.SRI.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP:REDDYEXPRESS, CHALLAKERE-577522, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

9 . S R I H P S A T I S H S / O . G . P A R A M E S H W A R A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 4 8 Y E A R S ,PROP:KALLESHWARA MOTOR SERVICE, HULIYAR ROAD, HOSADURGA-577527,CHITRADURGA (DIST) ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577003 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501,BY ITS SECRETARY.



SRI HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-M.

W.P. NOS. 42901-42902/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI HANUMANTHA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O NANJA NAIKA NAGARLE VILLAGE &POST, NANJANGUD TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B G RAGHURAM,ADVOCATE.) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT,MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-27 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-F AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. NOS. 42999-43009/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI H N ASHOK S/O H NEELAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O THIPPESWAMYCOMPOUND, V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA-577502.

2. SMT M T SUJATHA W/O LATE M V THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O V PEXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577502



3. SRI HALESHAPPA U M S/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/OECHAGATTA VILLAGE HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 . . .PETITIONERS (BY SMT.ANANDA SHETTY.A AND N.RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M SBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DAVANAGERE-577001.

3 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y R E P . B Y I T S S E C R E T A R YCHITRADURGA-577501.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S ADVOCATE FOR R4.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANTRECORDS. QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THEGOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEX-A.

W.P. NOS. 43107-43111/2015 & W.P.NO.43112/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT M SHIVASHAKTHI W/O S.A. MUTHURAMAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DOOR NO.47,BEJJALAPALYA, MUKKANAPALYA POST, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK & DIST.

2. SMT. KAMALA 32 YEARS & SRI. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SRI.MALLIKARJUNA MOTOR SERVICE, CHANNAGIRI ROAD, DAVANAGERE- 577001.

3. MR. MOHAMED ASLAM AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O. LATE ABDUL SATTAR SAB,PROPRIETOR, SHIVAPRAKASH MOTOR SERVICE, BILICHODU, JAGALUR TALUK -577528DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

4. SRI V.H. KUMAR S/O R.K CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SRI GEETANJANEYAMOTORS, NO. 3245, 11TH MAIN, M.C.C. "B" BLOCK, DAVANAGERE- 577001.

5. MR. C.Y AMJAD ALI KHAN S/O LATE YUSOOF KHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, M.B.S. BUSSERVICE, COWDALLI, KOLLEAGAL TALUK -571440 CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE.) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-



560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H ROAD,BANGALORE -560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE- 577001 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGAR- 571313, BY ITS SECRETARY ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4;

SRI HARISH KUMAR.M.S ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERATAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.

W.P. NOS. 43178-43179/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. M.P. THIPPESWAMY S/O SRI PUNYA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AREDDYHALLI GOPANAHALLI POST CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522

2. SRI H V NAGARAJ S/O VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A HOUSING BOARD COLONYCHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA-577 522 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESH R, ADVOCATE.)AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560 001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE TURUVANURROAD CHITRADURGA-577 501 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HARISH BHANDARY.T. ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDEANNX-A TO THE W.P.

W.P. NOS. 43219-43223/2015 & W.P.NO. 43224/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. J. RAMESH S/O SRI JOWARILAL AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO.69, SECOND FLOOR,MEENASOWKA REGENCY GOVINDAPPA ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU -560004.



2. SMT H LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SRI HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS MAINROAD, KUMBARAPET KOLAR -563 101.

3. SRI S N ANIL KUMAR S/O LATE SRI S NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS FORT-E STREETKALASIPALYAM BENGALURU -560 002

4. SRI K KUMRASWAMY S/O SRI KALI GOUNDER AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO.37/333,ALBERT VICTOR ROAD C STREET, KALASIPALYAM BENGALURU- 560 002.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJ GUPTA, ADVOCATE.) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI B. PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-D PASSED BYR-1 AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.


1. SRI. M.N. VEERANDRA PATIL AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O P.C. NAGANAGOWDA,MEDAGINAKERE, JAGALUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT- 577 501.

2. M.SHANMUGA RAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O T. MUTTUSWAMY, DOOR NO. 71/B,TRIVENI NAGARA, T. NARASIPURA TOWN - 571124, MYSORE DISTRICT.

3. SMT. M.SHANTAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O P.V. SRINIVASAIAH, NO. 10/12, 4THMAIN, MADIWALA NEW LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 068.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH A & SRI.M R V ACHAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE -560 001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE -577 002 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE WEST, MYSORE DISTRICT-570 001.



4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 034 BY ITSSECRETARY.

5. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HAREESH BHANDORY.T ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FORENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. NOS. 43607-43608/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI G V CHANDRASHEKAR S/O G T VENKATASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARSVINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICES, A.V. ROAD, KALASIPALYAM BANGALORE.

2. SRI M C VENKATESH MURTHY S/O M V CHANDRASHEKARA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 45YEARS R/AT NO. 5, CHURCH STREET SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027.


1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO. 229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING, K. H. ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560027 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE - 560027 REP. BY MANANGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-3;

SRI HARISH BHANDARY.T ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFTHE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 [ANNEX-C].




1. SMT. R MAHESWARI W/O NAGENDRAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, CHITTUR PUBLICTRANSPORT SERVICE COMPANY, PRAKSHAM HIGH ROAD, CHITTOR, ANDRA PRADESH.

2. M.VENKATESH BABU S/O MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO. 134, CBT ROAD,KOTE, KUNIGAL, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130.

3. SRI RAJANNA.R.

S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, NO. 7/4, TOLLGATE CIRCLE, NEAR PETHRI PETROLBUNK, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

4. AZMATHULLA KHAN S/O BASHU AHAMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 6TH BLOCK,JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011.

5. M. KRISHNAN S/O MUTTUSWAMY GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S.N.PALYA, HEBBUR,TUMKUR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M.E.NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO. 229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING,BENGALURU - 560 001.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FORR1 TO R3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY.T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-E.

W.P. NOS. 43909-43916/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI ABDUL KHALEEM S/O SRI. MOHAMMED HAYATH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, # 68, 'D'CROSS MAIN, BCC COLONY, JAYANAGAR 'C' BLOCK, BANGALORE- 560011.

2. SRI. ABDUL SALEEM S/O SRI. MOHAMMED HAYATH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, # 20, 4TH'F' STREET, TSP ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE - 560002 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C



NARASIMHACHAR AND SRI C.N.SREEVATSVA ADVOCATES) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE- 560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT (HEARING AUTHORITY) # 229, II FLOOR, III STAGE,M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE -560001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560027 REP: BY ITS MANAGAING DIRECTOR

4. MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE METROPOLITIAN, TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY.T, ADVOCATE FOR R3-R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER OF THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 [ANNEX-C].

W.P. NOS. 43924-43926/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI D RAMACHANDRAN S/O SRI R DEVADAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 3RD CROSS, NEARWATER TANK, NETHAJI NAGAR HALANAHALLI, MYSORE - 570001

2. SRI RAM KUMAR D S/O VADDAS R BUS OPERATOR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO. 7/11,MAHADESHWARA COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLEGAL - 571313 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

3. SMT T V RENUKA W/O SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS KAGALAVADI VILLAGE -571117 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.A S PARASARA KUMAR,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIEDBUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560001

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE - 570001 REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3;



SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-H.


1. SRI. T.L. LOKESH S/O SRI LAKSHMIPATHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROPRIETOR,DHARANI ASSOCIATES, NO 296, SECOND MAIN, T R NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 028.

2. SRI T R SRINIVASA REDDY S/O SRI T RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS THIPPASANDRAVILLAGE, GUNJUR POST, VIA VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560 087.

3. MR. UMMERKHAYUM KHAN S/O LATE MR. M AYUB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARSPROPRIETOR, A.T.S. BUS SERVICE K R EXTENSION, CHINTAMANI CHICKABALLAPURADISTRICT-563 125

4. MS. MEHER D/O MR BASHA SAB, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS K R EXTENSION, CHINTAMANI,CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN-563 125

5. SMT V SUMA W/O SRI S V GANESH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS NO.85/A, 5TH CROSS, 3RDBLOCK, T R NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 028 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJAGUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-D ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P. NOS. 44566-44570/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. H. MOHAMMAD SAB S/O LATE DASTAGIR SAB AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS PROP: SRILAXMI EXPRESS R/O NO.510/1, VENKABHOVI COLONY, 1ST CROSS, DAVANAGERE-577 002.



2. SRI. H. GOUSE PEER S/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAB AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PROP: SRILAXMI EXPRESS R/O NO.510/1, VENKABHOVI COLONY, 1ST CROSS DAVANAGERE-577 002.

3. SRI H MOHAMMAD RAFIQ S/O LATE MOHAMMAD SAB, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,PROP:SRI LAXMI EXPRESS, R/O NO.510/1, VENKABHOVI COLONY, 1ST CROSS,DAVANAGERE-577002. DAVANAGERE.

4. SRI G H MAKASUD AHMAD S/O B.G.HABIBULLA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O.NO.339/1,4TH CROSS, NEAR WATER TANK, N.R.PET, DAVANAGERE-577006.

5. SRI H M SURESH BABU S/O MAHARUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O SUVARNASADANA, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN, RAVINDRANAGAR, SHIMOGA-577202.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. RAJASHEKAR AND SRI ANANDA SHETTY A, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BEGNALURU-560001.




SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEX-A.

W.P. NOS. 45088-45092/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. B.C.SANDESH S/O SRI B.S.CHIDANAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PROP:S.R.EXPRESS, HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501

2. SRI M T GIRIJAMMA W/O SRI M.V THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP:THIPPESWAMY TRANSPORT, JCR EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501.

3. SRI H.P. SHEETAL PRASAD, S/O PASHAWANATH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, BILCHODU-577 553, JAGALURU (TALUK), DAVANAGERE (DIST.,) . . .PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:




2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577 003 BY ITS SECRETARY

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T , C O R P O R A T I O N K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI HARESSH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-F.


1. SRI. H.K. GIRISH SAWANTH S/O H P KRISHNA RAO , AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O NO.101,4TH CROSS, D. DEVARAJU URS LAYOUT, 'A' BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577007 REPD. BY HISGPA HOLDER SRI M G NARAYANA RAO, S/O LATE M R GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, R/O D DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, A BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577007

2. SRI M G NARAYANA RAO S/O LATE M R GANESH RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O DDEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, A BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577007

3. SRI M G PRAKASH RAO S/O LATE M R GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O DDEVARAJ URS LAYOUT, A BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577007 REPD. BY HIS GPA HOLDER- SRI MG NARAYANA RAO, S/O LATE M R GANESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D DEVARAJURS LAYOUT, 'A' BLOCK, DAVANAGERE-577007

4. SRI A MANJUNATH S/O A SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, PROP:SRI GAYATHRIMOTOR SERVICE, SANTHEPET, CHITRADURGA-577501 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANDASHETTY A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRASNPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE-577001

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;



SRI. B.PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNX-A.

W.P. NO.45753/2015 BETWEEN:

M R . S C V E N K A T E S A N S / O . S . C H A L L A P P A N , A G E D A B O U T 6 0 Y E A R S , S R I .VENKATESHWARA SERVICE, R/O. NO.4/289, SIPCOT HOUSING COLONY, DARGA,HOSUR-635 126, TAMIL NADU STATE ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.C V KUMAR & SRI S.V.KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027, REP: BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-1DT.5.8.2015 (ANNX-B).

W.P. NOS. 45902-45904/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. H. NATRAJ S/O HANUMANTARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,SRINIVASA LODGE, MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR-572143 CHITRADURGA (DIST)

2. SRI I SALAM W/O SRI KASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 96, MUSLIMSTREET, 1ST WARD, ARSIKERE, HARAPANAHALLI-583131 DAVANAGERE (DIST)

3. SRI ZAKIR BAIG S/O WAHAB BAIGA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BMS BUS SERVICE,BASAWARAJAPETE, DAVANAGERE-577001 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B R SHAILENDRA,ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577501 BY ITS SECRETARY



3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577003 BY ITS SECRETARY

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. HARISH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-F.

W.P. NOS. 45975-45977/2015 BETWEEN:

1. MR. J K HAYATH KHAN S/O MR. JALAL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ADIGARAKALLAHALLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 106

2. SRI. J. ASHWATH NARAYANA BABU S/O SRI. G. LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,NO.22/2, C-STREET, FORT, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560002 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.B R SUNDARRAJ GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE- G ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P. NOS.47006-47009/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI P PUTTURAJU S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, TRIVENINAGAR,OPP: GOVERNMENT OF HOSPITAL, T.NARASIPURA-5711 124, MYSURU DISTRICT.

2. SRI R R SHANMUGAM S/O RASAPPA GOWNDER, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O KUVEMPUEXTENSION, SATTI ROAD, CHAMARAJNAGAR DISTRICT

3. SRI K.S. SIDDARAJ URS S/O B.M. SIDDARAJ URS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, NANJANGUDROAD, T.NARASIPURA -571 124, MYSURU DISTRICT.



... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSURU WEST, MYSURU-571 001

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE- E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.

W.P. Nos. 47253-47254/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. G.S. REKHA SURESH W/O G.S.SURESHGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,PROPRIETRIX-DURGAMBA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O MUKTHENAHALLI, HONNALI TALUK,DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 218.

2. SRI NMJB ARADHYA S/O JAYADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, PROP:MALLIKARJUNAMOTOR SERVICE, R/O CHANNAGIRI ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 004 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.RAJASHEKAR, FOR SRI A ANANDA SHETTY, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE - 577001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTIFICATION DTD:05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED ATANNEXURE-A.

W.P.NOS.47369-47371/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SRI. R. SRINIVAS, S/O RAMAIAH KOTTE, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS BUS OPERATOR, #173,SRI GOPAIASWAMY ROAD, DEVANAHALLI -562 110 BENGALURU (DIST).

2. SRI ALTAFULLA KHAN, S/O PYAREJAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 92,N E A R C H A N N A K E S H W A R A T E M P L E , A T T I B E L L E - 5 6 2 1 0 7 A N E K A L ( T A L U K )BENGALURU(DIST).

3. SRI S.N.GOPI, S/O LATE SRI NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 1221,8TH CROSS, 18TH MAIN, B.T.M. LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, 1ST CROSS, BENGALURU-560 029.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.M.S.SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU -560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNXURE-F.

W.P.NO.47464/2015 BETWEEN SMT. S.NAGARATHNAMMA, D/O LATE N. SHIVANNA, AGEDMAJOR, NO 648, TALUK KACHERI ROAD, T.NARASIPURA, MYSURU DISTRICT.

REP BY G.P.A. KENDAGANA SWAMY.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) AND

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSURU WEST, MYSURU-571 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;



SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-B AND QUASHTHE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.47606-47607/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. M.V.SUBRAMANYA, S/O LATE SRI M V VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, PETEMALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT PIN : 571430.

2. SMT PREMA SHIVANNA, D/O LATE SRI M V VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PETEMALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT PIN : 571430.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560001.

2 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A LHANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA - 571401.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R3;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-FAND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.


SRI. N MUDDAPPA, S/O M. NARASIMHAIAH, AGED 76 YEARS, R/AT NO.1649, NAGAPPABLOCK, SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU - 56001.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.V.KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY), NO.229, II FLOOR, III



STAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560027. REPTD. BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA, FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-B.

W.P.NOS.49463-49464/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. M.S.GANDHI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S SRI DEVTRANSPORT, NO.734/1, KRISHNA ENGINEERING COMPLEX, OPP. OLD BUS STAND,DAVANAGERE-577 003.

2. SRI NARAYANASALDWA, S/O LATE NAGENDRAPPA SALDWA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,PROP:HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE, HARIHARA-577601, DAVANAGERE.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V P EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501,BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577 003. BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE KARANTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

W.P.NOS.49743-49747/2015 & W.P.NOS.49748-49751/2015 BETWEEN



1 . SRI SYED TAJAM, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, ACHAL (POST) ,KANAKPURA-562 117, BENGALURU (DIST).

2. SRI. SHANKRE GOWDA S/O CHIKKALINGAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, #192, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJAPETE-577001, BENGALURU.

3. SRI. SHIVALINGEGOWDA, S/O CHIKKALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR,, #192, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJAPETE-577001, BENGALURU.

4. SMT. B.S. SHASHIKALA, W/O K.P. MRUTYUNJAYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, #17, MARUTHI EXTENSION, NEAR BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA-560 078,BENALURU.

5. SRI. MOHAN RAJ, S/O CHIKKALINGAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,#192, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJAPETE-577001 BENGALURU.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE ) AND


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARA DIVISION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, RAMANAGARA-571 511. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA DIVISION, REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE, MANDYA-571401.

BY ITS SECRETARY.



SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-H.

WP NOS. 50170-50173/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. GOPINATH K S/O KONDAPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROPRIETOR: J.P.T.BUS SERVICE, NO.20, SINGARA MUTHALIYA STREET, HOSUR TALUK, KRISHNAGIRIDISTRICT, TAMIL NADU-635109



2. SRI R ARASAPPA GOUNDER SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR.

2(a) SRI A. PANNEER SELVAM S/O ARASAPPA GOUNDER AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS SRIVENKATESHWARA TRANSPORTS NO.9/13, SQUARE MARKET METTUR DAM, SALEMDISTRICT TAMIL NADU-636 401.

3. SMT PUNITHAVATHY C W/O CHENNAKRISHNAN S, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, H-125, NEWASTC, HUDCO, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMIL NADU-635109

4. SRI SABAPATHY NADAR N S/O NALLAMUTHU NADAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/ATNO.4/15, NAGARATHAR STREET, KELAMANGALAM POST, DENKANIKOTTAI TALUK,KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU-635113 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C V KUMAR,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERENMENTTRANSPORT DEAPRTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY), NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER OF THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 (ANNX-E).


SRI H C MAHESH, S/O CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O PALLAGATTE, JAGALURTALUK, DAVANAGERE - 577528.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.ANANDA SHETTY, AND SHRI N. RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, M SBUILIDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DAVANAGERE -577001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027.



... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

W.P.NOS.50457-50458/2015 BETWEEN:

1. AZIMUNNISA BEGUM, AGE 59 YEARS, W/O LATE S NISAR AHMED, M/S SKS TRAVELS,NO.10 C KALSIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

2. R RAGHUPATI GOWDA, S/O D RAMEGOWDA, AGE 52 YEARS, BOMMASANDRA, M N HALLIPOST, MULUBAGAL POST, KOLAR-563132.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE HEARING AUTHORITY/ ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,NO.229, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD STAGE, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDERISH, AGA FOR R1 & R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DATED5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-E.

W.P.NOS.50460-50472/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.B.G.VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O BETHUR GURUBASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,NO.815/62-63, KALLESWARA NILAYA, SHIVAKUMARASWAMY NAGAR, FIRST STAGE,KADADI ROAD, DAVANGERE-577 001.

2. SRI CHIKKE GOWDA, S/O CHIKKA HONNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, KODATHAPPANAPALYA, KUDUR , III BLOCK, MAGADI TALUK-562 120, RAMNAGAR DISTRICT.



3. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O SRI. A.SACHIN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, II MAIN, II CROSS,VINOBANAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

4. SMT. SUSHMA, W/O SANJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, II MAIN, II CROSS,VINOBANAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

5. SRI D AMBANNA, S/O LATE K T DHARNENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SRIMAHADEVI TRANSPORT, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577522, CHITHRADURGADIST.

6. SRI A SANMATHY KUMNAR, S/O D AMBANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RAILWAYSTATION ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101.

7. SRI D PRABHAKAR, S/O LATE K T DHARNENDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SRIMAHADEVI MOTORS, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577 522, CHITRHRADURGADISTRICT.

8. SRI H R KESHAVA, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, S N MOTORSERVICE, HEBBUR-572 120, TUMKUR DISTIRCT.

9. SMT. R JAYALAKSHMI, W/O LATE D KRISHNA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.21/121,RAMARAMBA EXTESNION, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313.

10. SRI NAGENDRA, S/O LATE NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, DOOR NO.15/237,COURT ROAD, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313.

11. SMT. M P PARVATHAMMA, W/O LATE P M RANGANATH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,HANUMAN MOTOR SERVICE, SIRA-572 137, TUMKUR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.B.NAGARAJA , ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE-577 001, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMNAGAR-562 159, BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMKUR-572 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.



6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITHRADURGA-577 501, BY ITS SECRETARY.

7. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313, BY ITS SECRETARY.

8. KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING I FLOOR, K H ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 & R3 TO R8;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THESAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


SRI MOHAMMED RAHAMATHULLA, S/O. M.R. ABDUL MAJEED,, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,R/O. VARDHI MOHALLA, MOLAKALMURU, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI.A. ANANDA SHETTY AND SHRI N. RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMCBUILDING, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T. ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANN-A.

W.P.NOS.50534-50535/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. S. KARUNAKARAN, S/O.SRI.SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,THOPPANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, PIN: 563114.

2. SRI A SOMASHEKAR, S/O.SRI.S.ANNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S.T.M.S.MOTORSERVICE, ARAKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN:571415.




1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD-

T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A L H A N U M A N T H A I A H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORTS AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.M.T.C. BUILDING, FIRST FLOOR, SHANTHINAGARA,BENGALURU-560027.

4. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA-571401.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FORTHE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO G.O. DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-F AND QUASH THESAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


SMT. K.J.NIRMALA, W/O LATE K G DAYANANDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PROP: S N MOTORSERVICE, LIONS BHAVAN ROAD, DODDABALLAPUR, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561203.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.S.PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, B.M.T.C. COMPLEX,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.



... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDTD:5.8.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-D;

W.P.NOS. 52182-52183/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.HABEEBULLA KHAN, S/O BAKSHU KHAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.786,FORT, KOLAR-563101.

2. SRI. ATHAULLA KHAN, S/O BAKSHU KHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.786, FORT,KOLAR-563101.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.V. KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR, BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE O THER.T.O, KOLAR-563101.

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027. REP. BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 [ANNEX-C].

W.P.NOS.52787/2015 & W.P.NOS.52788-52791/2015 & W.P.NOS. 52792-52794/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT LAVANYA V, W/O LATE SRI M R NAGABUSHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,RUDRESHWAR NILAYA, K E B LAYOUT, BATAWADI, TUMAKURU-572101.

2. MR G SALMAN, S/O MR GOUSE BASHA , AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, NO.2828/A,TIPPUNAGARA, BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRCIT , PIN:563114.



3. SRI KUMARASWAMY , S/O SRI KALI GOUNDER , AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.37/333,ALBERT VICTOR ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

4 . M R J K H A Y A T H K H A N , S / O M R J A L A L K H A N , A G E D A B O U T 5 6 Y E A R S ,ADIGARAKALLAHALLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562106.

5. SMT N K JAYANTHI, W/O LATE SRI B T MANJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, BEVUKALLU,DUDDA HOBLI, MANDYA DISTRICT.

6. SMT V S LAKSHMI, W/O SRI K P LAVA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, FAIROZ FARM,ARCHARAKARAHALLI, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT.

.. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENAGLURU-560001.

2. THE KARNTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION , KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRASPORT AUTHORITY, TUMAKURU-572101.

4. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, B M T C.,BUILDINGS, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

5. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRASNPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARAM-571511.

6. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDAY-571401.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3-R6;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTRIE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-J,AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.

W.P.NOS.52922-52924/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. ZAMEER AHMED, S/O K M ABDUL RAHAMAN, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.1003, OLD POSTOFFICER ROAD, KOLAR.

2. SRI. K.T. RAJASHEKAR, S/O LATE K GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, S R STRAVELS, NO.32, T.S.P.ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE.



3. SRI. AMEER PASHA, S/O M ABDUL RAZACK, AGED 52 YEARS, M.B.S.EXPRESS,PADMAGATTA, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563132.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.V.KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA , BANGALORE - 560001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, (HEARING AUTHORITY) NO.229, II FLOOR, IIISTAGE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

3 . KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORTY, TTMC BUILDING, K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560027, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560027, REP BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 (ANNX-G).

W.P.NOS.53163-53165/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. T. R. NAGAPRASAD, S/O LATE N.R.REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PROP: SRSTOURIST SERVICE, NEAR PRIVATE BUS STAND, BASAWESHWARA ROAD, TUMAKURU - 572101.

2. SRI SHANKARNARAYANA REDDY, S/O CHAMRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, # 39, RCR LAYOUT, EDAVANAHALLI (VILLAGE & POST), ANEKAL 562 106,BENGALURU (DISTRICT).

3. SMT. USHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, AICT COMPUTER CENTRE,HOUSING BOARD COLONY, CHALLKERE - 577 522.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.M.S.SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.



3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMAKURU REGION, PB ROAD, TUMAKURU -572 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRASNPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501,BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU - 27.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD:5.8.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-F.

WP NOS. 53204-53207/2015 & W.P.NOS.54555- 561/2015:

BETWEEN

1. SRI. K S MALLESHAPPA S/O. SHEKARAPPA K.H., AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP:MALATHESH MOTOR SERVICE, R/O. NO.97, 8TH CROSS, "A" BLOCK, DEVARAJ URSBADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577 008.

2. SMT. RACHANA S.N.

W/O. J.M. SHAMBU SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. NO.840, "ANUGRAHA", 2NDBUS-STOP, THARALU BALU NAGAR, VIDHYA NAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 010.

3. SRI. KHANDOJI RAO S/O. DEVENDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. NALABANDASTREET, DUGGAMPETE, DAVANAGERE-577 009.

4. SRI. C. RAMESH S/O. ANEPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP: S.T.R.M.S., R/O.CHANNAGIRI, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 213.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI A.ANANDA SHETTY AND SRI N. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.




3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (By Sri. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2 SRI HAREESH BHANDARY.T,ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMETN VIDE ANN-A.


SRI. H.B. MALLIKARJUNA, S/O BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BATAWADI,TUMKUR-572101.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.H.ROAD, TUMKUR-572101, REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 TO R3;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-D.

W.P.NOS.54756-54759/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI AGHA KHAN, S/O.LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP:K.K.TRAVELS,#10-C, KP MAIN ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

2 . S R I H A F E E Z K H A N , S / O . L A T E K A R E E M K H A N , A G E D A B O U T 6 0 Y E A R S ,PORP:K.K.TRAVELS, # 10-C, KP MAIN ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:




2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A" BLOCK,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-500027. BY ITS SECRETARY.



SRI. B. PHALALKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THER -1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E.

W.P.NOS.54761-54765/2015 & W.P.NOS.54766- 54767/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SUSHEELA, D/O M VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 4,YELLAPPA STREET, CHIKA MAVALLI, BENGALURU.

2. SRI MIRZA ISMAIL BAIG, S/O AMIR BAIG , AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #326/2, AV ROAD, KALASIPALYAM BENGALURU-560002.

3. SMT PREMA, W/O A PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 76,VINAYAKANAGARA, HESARAGHATTA, BENGALURU-560088.

4. SMT SHAMA BEGUM, W/O AYUB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #37/333, AV ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

5. SMT N RUPASHREE, W/O P SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #369/C, 5TH CROSS, LAKSHMI ROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU-560027.

6. SRI IMRAN KHAN, S/O AYUB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, # 37/333,AV ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT , TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARA DIVISION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, RAMANAGARA-571511. BY ITS SECRETARY.



3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B D A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA DIVISION, REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE, MANDYA-571401, BY ITS SECRETARY.

5 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K H R O A D ,BEGNALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. B. PHALAKSAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-J.

W.P.NOS.54879-54881/2015 BETWEEEN:

1. SMT. SOWBHAGYA, W/O. SRI. S. VISHWARADHYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX,VIJAYANANDI MOTOR SERVICE, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN: 572 132.

2. SRI. V.C. BASAVANNA, S/O. SRI. VADARE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, NO.378, OLDPOST OFFICE ROAD, T. NARASIPURA, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 124.

3. SRI. M. SOMASHEKAR, S/O. SRI. MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, MKL-12,MUSUVINAKOPPAL, M. KABBEHUNDI POST, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571124.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.


T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A L H A N U M A N T H A I A H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, FIRST FLOOR, B.M.T.C., BUILDINGS, SHANTHINAGARA,BENGALURU-560 027.

4. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSURU WEST, MYSURU-570001.



...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA., R1, R3 & R4;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


1. SMT USHA SUBRAMANYA, D/O SRI S MAYANNA, AGED ABOTU 54 YEARS, NO.463/4,RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION, 12TH MAIN, BENGALURU, PIN:560 094.

2. SRI. S. ABHISHEK, S/O SRI M V SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, UDAYARANGAMOTOR SERVICE, BAZAAR STREET, MALAVALLI , MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN:571 430.

3. SRI K NAGENDRA, S/O LATE SRI KRISHNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, PETEMALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN:571 430.

4. SMT. ROOPASHREE, W/O SRI P SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, JATIN MOTORS,MARAGONDANAHALLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, PIN:571 430.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560 001.


T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A L H A N U M A N T H A I A H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA-571 401.

4. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARAM-571 511.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA., R1, R3 & R4;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER ATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-L ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.




SRI. P.M. RAHAMATHULLA S/O P.M.AMANULLA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP:NEWVIJAYALAKSHMI MOTOR SERVICE, R/O MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR, CHITRADURGADISTRICT-572143.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI A ANANDA SHETTY AND SRI N. RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.




NOTICE TO R-3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONDTD:5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.


1. SMT. G.H.JALAJAKSHI, W/O.G.VIJAYAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.24-30,BANIJAGARA STREET, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313.

2. SRI B K THIPPESWAMY, S/O.B KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, AKSHAYANILAYA, MUNICIPAL COLONY, N.H.4, KELAKOTE, CHITRADURGA-577501.

3. SMT SUMANGALA DEVI, W/O.H.KOTRESH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BEHIND UNITYHEALTH COMPLEX, KELAKOTE, CHITRADURGA-577501.

4. SRI R M GOVINDA, S/O.MUTHU SETTY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RAMAPURA VILLAGE &POST, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571440, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

5. SRI K N SHARATH KUMAR, S/O.K.M.NARENDRA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,NO.2577/57, SIDDAVEERAPPA EXTENSION, 7TH CROSS, DAVANAGERE-577001.

6. SRI. G.V. VEERABHADRASWAMY, S/O.LATE VEERABHADRAAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS,NO.11/185, DEVENGA STREET, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313.



7. SRI. A.S. SATHISH, S/O.A.SUBBARAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NO.19, B.STREET, FORT,BANGALORE-560002.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.B.NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTD E P A R T M E N T , M U L S T I S T O R E Y E D B U I L D I N G S , D R . A M B E D K A R V E E D H I ,BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H.ROAD,BANGALORE-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRDURGA-577501, BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE-577001, BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGAR-562159, BY ITS SECRETARY.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R3-R6;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNEMNT ORDER DTD:5.8.2015 MARKED UNDERANNEXURE-E AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF WRIT OFCERTIORARI.

W.P.NOS.57481-57491/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI M K BASAVARAJU, S/O KALE GOWDA, AGE 44 YEARS, NO.1/7, 1ST FLOOR, MAGADIMAIN ROAD, TOLGATE CIRCLE, NEAR PREETHI PETROL BUNK, BENGALURU-560 079.

2. SRI. RAJENDRAN, S/O R RAMASWAMY, AGE 55 YEARS, NO.1337, 4TH MAIN ROAD,KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU-560 078.

3. SRI. K. SENGUTTUVAN, S/O LATE KARUPANNA AGE 40 YEARS, ARIYE NILAYA, N.S.PALYA, HEBBUR, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 103.

4. SRI. V.P. SATHISH, S/O BADRAVVA, AGE 35 YEARS, V.G. DODDI, MAGADI TALUK,RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-571 511.

5. SMT. LAKSHMI, W/O K.P. LAVA,, AGE 30 YEARS, FIROZ FARM, IJURU POST, B.M. ROAD,RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-571 512.



6. M.P. MURUGAN, S/O HONNASWAMY, AGE 52 YEARS, NO.3553/A, GOKUL HOTEL ROAD,HUNUSUR TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 105.




3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,BENGALURU-560 001.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGAR, BY ITS SECRETARY-571 511.

5 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

6. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MYSURU (WEST)-PIN 570 005, BY ITSSECRETARY.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, A.G.A. FOR R1 TO R4 & R6;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARMENTDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-E.

W.P.NOS.57492-57494/2015 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. M. N. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. K.M. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BUSO P E R A T O R , P A T E L A R A B E E D I , K . K . P E T E , S H E E D A L A G H A T T A - 5 6 2 1 0 5 ,DODDABALLAPURA(DIST).

2. SRI. K.N. DEVENDRANATH, S/O. A. NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,PATELARA BEEDI, K.K. PETE, SHEEDALAGHATTA-562 105, DODDABALLAPURA (DIST).

3. SRI. C. AKMAL, S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: B H N S,NARASARAJAPETE, DAVANAGERE-572 001.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.M.S.SHARIFF, ADVOCATE ) AND:




2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHIKKABALLAPURA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577 003. BY ITS SECRETARY.


... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-F.

WP NO. 59372/2015 BETWEEN SRI. R. PANDURANGA S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS,NO. 4, CUBBONPET, 3RD CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 002.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDANANJAIAH ADVOCATE.) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENT &PANCHAYATH RAJ (HEARING AUTHORITY), M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560 027. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4. KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

NOTICE TO R-3 & R-4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. ISFILED UNDER ARTICLE OF 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYINGTO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-1 DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-B.




SMT. N. PADMA W/O LATE H M GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/OHIREKALMATA HONNALI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 577256 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.A.ANANDA SHETTY AND SHRI N. RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M SBUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP BY SECRETARY DAVANGERE - 577001

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K H ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRSH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONDTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEX-B.

W.P.NOS.119-122/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI K G M KALLINATH S/O MALLIKARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KALLINATHANILAYA, NEAR POLICE QUARTERS, JAGALURU - 577 528.

DAVANAGERE DIST.

2. SRI T M GANESHAN S/O P MARAPPA GOUDAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PROP:VIJAYALAKSHMI TRANSPORT, B.B.ROAD, HIRIYUR-572 143 CHITRADURGA DIST.

3. SRI Y N SRINIVAS S/O NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,BEHIND TRAVELERS BUNGALOW, INDIRANAGAR, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE - 577 003. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501.BY ITS SECRETARY.



4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHIKKABALLAPURA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH AGA FOR R1-4 SRI. B PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATEFOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DT.05.08.2015 VIDE ANNX-F.

W.P.NOS.325-327/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI. A.V.C. VEERABADRAPPA S/O SRI. A.V CHICKAPPAIANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS FORTSTEET, VIJAYAPURA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562135 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B RSUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE RURAL , B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-34 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR-563101

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BANGLAORE- 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGE FOR R1-R3;

SRI. B PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATEWRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.922-923/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI E SRINIVASAN S/O ILIYAR CHETTIAR, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,MODEL HOUSE, NO.2, 1ST CROSS, 7TH MAIN, GOKULAM, MYSORE.



2. SRI.S.RAJU S/O E.SRINIVASAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR MADARI MANE,NO.2, 1ST CROSS, 7TH MAIN, GOKULAM 3RD STAGE, MYSORE.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE-570 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. B PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTDT.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNX-G.

WP NOS. 1671-1675/2016 & W.P.NOS.1676-1677/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAMESH C S/O ANNAPPA K.L.

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, T.B.ROAD, CHANNAGIRI - 577 213 DAVANAGEREDISTRICT.

2. SRI G.R.NAGARAJ S/O RUDRAPPA G, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,MADIVALARA BEEDI, CHANNAGIRI - 577 213 DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

3. SRI ANNAYAPPA S/O LATE SEENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,KANMAVERAPET, HOSAKOTE - 562 114 BENGALURU DISTRICT.

4. SRI SUBBARAYIADU S/O LATE A OBALLAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, #19/B, STREET, FORT, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU PURA - 560 002.

5. SRI MOHAMMED KHASIM S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR SAB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, MAGMOTOR SERVICE, PAVAGADA - 561 202.



TUMAKURU DISTRICT.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE REGION, KONDAJJI ROAD,DAVANAGERE - 577 003. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR DIVISION, REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE, KOLAR - 563 101.

BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGARA DIVISION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, RAMANAGARA - 571 511. BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHITRADURGA REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, NEAR AISHWARYA HOTEL, V.P.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R6.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DT.5.8.2015 AS PER ANNX-H.

W.P.NOS.1916-1917/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI R BALAKRISHNAN S/O RANGARAMANUJAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O HANURMAIN ROAD KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT PIN - 571440

2. SRI IQBAL S/O M AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OPP. GOVERNMENT HOSTEL T N PURAROAD, S.M. HALLI CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571440 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.A.SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT M SBUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001



2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGAR BY ITS SECRETARY PIN - 571313

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MYSORE WEST MYSORE - 572001 REP. BY ITSSECRETARY

4. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBENGALURU - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. . RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1-3 SRI M S HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRITPETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDERDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-C AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUANCEOF WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P.NO.2145/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI. M. N. HARISH S/O. NAGARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, VINAYAKAMOTOR SERVICES, VIVEKANANDA BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577 002.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.ANANDA SHETTY, AND N. RAJASHEKAR ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE, REP. BY IST SECRETARY-577002

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2 SRI B PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATEFOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONDT.05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNX-B.

WP NO. 2204/2016 & W.P.NOS.2205-2208/2016 & W.P.NO.2209/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI B. L. RAMESH S/O LATE B. LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS NO.342, PARVATHIEXTENSION, DEVALAPURA VILLAGE & POST, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYADISTRICT-571 445

2. SRI. M.N. HARISH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS & SMT. PANKAJA HARISH AGED ABOUT 36YEARS DOOR NO.1855/17, III CROSS, SWAMI VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, BIIT ROAD,DAVANAGERE-577 001



3. SRI. J. ESHWARAPPA S/O ALTE SHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS II CROSS,VENKATESHA NAGAR, SHIMOGA-577 201

4. SRI. H.K. GIRISH S/O LATE KESHAVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS PROPRIETOR,SNMS, HEBBUR-572 120 TUMKUR DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H B, ADV.)AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MANDYA-571 401 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE-577 001 BY ITS SECRETARY

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR -572 101 BY ITS SECRETARY . . .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3 TO R5 SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADV.FOR R2) THESE W.Ps. ARE FILED PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDSPERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANN-E AND QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER, ETC.

W.P.NO.2211/2016:

BETWEEN:

SMT. CHENNALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SRI.L.SAMPANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,R/AT NO.5973, SONDEKUPPA ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL,B.D.A.COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR



R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENTORDER DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-B AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BYISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P.NO.3064/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI.M.R.ABDUL MAJEED SAB S/O LATE ABDUL RAHIM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARSPROPRIETOR, M/S S.R.M.S. MOLAKALMURU CHITRADURGA DISTRICT1 ... PETITIONER (BYSRI. ANANDA SHETTY A & SRI.N.RAJASHEKHAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, K.H. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2 SRI. M S HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THISWRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH THE IMPUNGED NOTIFICATIONDTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRODUCED AT ANNEX-B.


SRI G T AJAYKUMAR S/O THAMMAPPA, AGED 29 YEARS, SR ROAD, GANDHINAGAR,CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2 SRI B PALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATEFOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE



CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDIGS OF THE GOVERNMENTORDER DTD.05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-B.

W.P.NOS.3629-3633/2016 & W.P.NOS.3634-3635/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. H. M. SUBRAMANI S/O. LATE MUNNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, HENNUR VILLAGE, KALYANANAGARA (POST), BENGALURU-560 043.

2. MR. J. NAYAZ AHAMED S/O. LATE ABDUL JALEEL, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OLD POSTOFFICE ROAD, ANDERSONPETE, KGF, KOLAR-563 101.

3. SRI. A. BALAKRISHNA S/O. LATE ACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR,METTUR STREET, CHICKABALLAPURA-571 501.

4. SRI. E. AMARNATH S/O. SRI. H. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROP:S O M E S H W A R A P P A M O T O R S , R A N G E N A H A L L I ( P O S T ) , T E R I K E R E ( T A L U K ) ,CHIKAMAGALURU (DIST)-577 101.

5. SRI. K. PRABHU S/O. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, #104, GAURI BHAVI PALYA,HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU.

6. SRI. ABDUL JAVEED S/O. ABDUL WAJEED, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, #26, BOMANAHALLI,BENGALURU-560 068.

7. SMT. AMEERUNNISA BEGUM W/O. LATE NISAR AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, ANDSRI. NADEEB AHAMED, S/O. LATE NISAR AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, PROP: SKSTRAVELS, KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, A.V. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:


2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR REGION, REGIONAL TRANSPORTOFFICE, KOLAR-563 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHIKKAMAGALURU REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101, BY ITS SECRETARY.



5. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A" BLOCK, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY.


... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R5 SRI. M S HARISH KUMAR,ADVOCATE FOR R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-K.

W.P.NO.5302/2016:

BETWEEN:

MS SAJEEDUNNISSA W/O LATE MR M A LATHEEF KHAN, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,PROPRIETRIX, A.T.S BUS SERVICE, CHINTAMANI, CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN:563125 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARA RAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTD E P A R T M E N T , M U L T I S T O R E Y E D B U I L D I N G S , D R A M B E D K A R V E E D H I ,BENAGLURU-560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B M T C., BUILDINGS, FIRST FLOOR,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA R1 & 2 SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRITPETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDERDTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-C AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF AWRIT OF CERTIORARI.

WP NOS. 6193-6194/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. R.N. KENCHARAJAIAH S/O R K NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, OLD DAIRY ROAD, CHINTAMANI - 563 125 KOLAR.

2. SRI S K MUNAWAR S/O SYED KAREEM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #7,MASJEED ROAD, BISMILLAHA NAGAR, BANNERAGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 029.



... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADV.) AND:


2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC COMPLEX,K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADV.FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYR-1 DATED 05.08.2015 AT ANNEX-E.

WP NOS. 7250-7260/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI SHIVASHANKAR S/O. LATE. P. SUBBARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO. 76, IIIMAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE 560 018

2. SRI. H.K. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O. LATE. KALASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO. 298,GADI MUDDANNA ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTN, BANGALORE 560079.

3. SRI. SHIVARATHNAMMA W/O. H.K KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO. 298,GADI MUDDANNA ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA NEW EXTN, BANGALORE 560079.

4. SRI. T.S. SUBRAMANYA S/O. P. SEETHARAM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, PRAKASHA MOTORSERVICE, THIMMANAHALLI, C.N. HALLI TALUK - 572 214 TUMKUR DIST.

5. SRI. S. BASAVARAJU S/O. LATE. M. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO. 55/1,DEVANGA STREET, YELANDHUR - 571 441 CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.NAGARAJA H B, ADV.) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE560001

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHI NAGAR, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE 560027. REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGARA 562 159 REP BY ITS SECRETARY

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MANDYA 571 401, REP BY ITS SECRETARY



5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TUMKUR 572 101, REP BY ITS SECRETARY

6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGARA, 571 313 REP BY ITSSECRETARY ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3 TO R6 SRI. HAREESHBHANDARY, ADV. FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING OT GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 05.08.2015 AT ANNEX-EAND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.


SRI. C.S. SATHISH KUMAR S/O SHESHACHALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BUSOPERATOR, CHORNUR, SANDUR TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITSGENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI M C BASAVARAJAPPA S/O SRICHENNABASAPPA AGED ABOTU 45 YEARS SURADDAHALLI GRAMA, DEVIKERE POST,JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.A S PARASARA KUMAR,ADV.) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY NEAR PETROL BUNK, DAVANAGERE - 577 001

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADV. FOR R4) THIS W.P.IS FILED PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEUNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DATED 05.08.2015 ATANNEX-D.

W.P.NO.7532/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI. A. M. GANGADHARA S/O. A. MURIGEPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KAMMARAGATTE,HONNALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 217.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A & N.RAJASHEKHAR, ADVS) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.



2 . T H E R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y K A R N A T A K A R O A D T R A N S P O R TCORPORATION, DAVANAGERE - 577 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDEIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2, SRI. M S HARISH KUMAR,ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEX-B.

WP NOS. 7616-7617/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SUNITA W/O LATE YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROP: SRI BASAVESHWARAMOTOR SERVICE, DABASPETE, NELAMANGALA-562 123 BENGALURU (DIST)

2. SMT BEBI RANI W/O S BHUPATHI , BUS OPERATOR, C/O RAMEGOWDA, S/OBYREGOWDA, AREHALLI, BELGUMBA (POST), KUTUGAL (HOBLI), RAMANAGARA (DIST), ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADV.) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B D A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE REGIOANAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGARA DIVISION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, RAMANGARA-571 511 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TOR3 SRI.B.PHAKSHAIAH, ADV. FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED PRAYING TOQUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R-1 DATED 05.08.2015 AT ANNEX-E.


SMT SARTAJ GOWHAREE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O RAHIM SHARIFF R/A RAJAJI ROADSRINIVASAPUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 315 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDANANJAIAH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.



2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENTAND PANCHAYATH RAJ (HEARING AUTHORITY) M S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE-506 027 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

4. TEH REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR BY ITS SECRETARY R T O OFFICEKOLAR DISTRICT-563 101 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, 2 & 4;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE RODER OF THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015VIDE ANNEX-B.


MR ABDUL MAJEED S/O MR. ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OLD POST OFFICEROAD, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAYTHE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 05.08.2015 PASSED BY R-1 AT ANNEX-B AND THEPETITIONER MAY BE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SERVICES UNDERPERMIT NO.5/2006-07 IN QUESTION PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.


SRI. G.V. VIDYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE G VEERABHADRAIAH DEVANGASTREET CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313.



... PETITIONER (BY SRI.NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BANGALORE- 560001.

2. THE KARANTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K H ROADBANGALORE-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313 BY ITS SECRETARY ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 3;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENTORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDEROR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 9254-9255/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI K R SHIVAPRAKASH S/O LATE K. RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NAVEENNILAYA, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501.

2. SRI K.J. MANJUNATH & SRI K.J. RAVISHANKAR, SONS OF LATE K.R. JAMUBKESHWARAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROP: JAIPADMA MOTOR SERVICE, 2ND CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION,CHITRADURGA-577 501.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT., TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560 001.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORIEDBUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, B.M.T.C. COMPLEX, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

4 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE FILES ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRYAING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY



THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DATED 05.08.2015BENGALURU AT ANNEX-E;


SRI. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE RANGE GOWDA, R/A KAGGALIPURAVILLAGE, SOSALE HOBLI, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-571 120.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDANANJAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, RURAL DEVELOPMENT &PANCHAYATH RAJ (HEARING AUTHORITY), M.S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, REP: BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA, BY ITS SECRETARY, R.T.O OFFICE,MANDYA DISTRICT-570 005.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R1, R2 AND R4;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATES FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF R-1DATED 05.08.2015 AT ANNEX-B.

W.P.NOS.9357-9359/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.B.SURESH, S/O LATE BARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RAGHAVENDRA NILAYA,6TH CROSS, BASAVANAGUDI, SHIVAMOGA - 577201.

2. SMT SOWMYA, W/O V. B. PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BHYRAVESHWARANILAYA, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, KRUSHI NAGARA, SHIVAMOGA - 577201.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANDA SHETTY A AND SRI. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORT, M S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, SHIVAMOGA, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, SHIVAMOGA - 577201.



3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560027.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DT.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNX-D.

W.P.NOS.9943-9947/2016 & W.P.NOS.9950-9952/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI H N KUMAR, S/O SRI.NARASANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HULIKATTE,CHAKRABHAVI POST, MADALADU HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT- 562159.

2. SRI.DEVARAJU, S/O KADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.186, PARK ROAD,SHANKARAPURA, BANGALORE -560 004.

3. SRI.VENKATESH RAO, S/O JAIMUNI RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.333, 9TH CROSS,RAILWAY LAYOUT, BHAVANI NAGARA, ULLALA ROAD, BANGALORE-560056.

4. SRI.SIDDALINGAIAH, S/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO.28/4, 7THCROSS, PAPI REDDY PALYA, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560072.

5. SRI.H.C.GIRISH, S/O.CHANNAVEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.132, 1ST MAIN, 5THCROSS, 9TH BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560072.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H.B., ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDIKAR VEEDHI,BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H.ROAD,BANGALORE-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARA-562 159, BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA-571401, BY IT'S SECRETARY.

5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMKUR-572101, BY IT'S SECRETARY.

6. REGIONAL TRANSPORT, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE- 560 027.



... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1, R3-R6;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 05.08.2015 AT ANNEX-E ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.


SRI. M. PARAMESWARAPPA, S/O. LATE MARULASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, M/SREPUBLIC MOTOR SERVICES, OPP. OLD BUS STAND, DAVANAGERE-577 002.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA SHETTY A., ADVOCATE) AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-5600001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, SHIVAMOGA, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, SHIVAMOGA-577 201.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA., FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD.5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEX-B.

W.P.NOS.9970-9971/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI G KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O SRI.S.GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.63, FORT 'B'STREET, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU-560002.

2. SRI.H.R.VIJAYAKUMARA, S/O SRI.H.RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,SHYLAJA MOTORS, KENGAPURA, CHENNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577213.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARA RAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.



2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, NEAR S.P.'S OFFICE, KONDAJJIROAD, DAVANAGERE-577001.


T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K E N G A L H A N U M A N T H A I A H R O A D ,BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAIDGOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATEWRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NOS.19590-19591/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. NOOR BAIG, S/O KHADER BAIG, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, #13/20, 1STFLOOR, K.S.V.NILAYA BUILDING, KALASIPALYAM, BENGALURU - 560 002.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.M.S. SHERIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORTDEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA. FOR R1 & R2;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE R-1 DTD.5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEX-C.

W.P.NOS.30412-30448/2016 BETWEEN:

1. MR. B REHAMATHULLA KHAN, S/O LATE MR. B.P.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT55 YEARS, NO 186, P M K ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM, BENGALURU - 560004.



2. MR B ATHAULLA KHAN, S/O LATE MR.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,NATIONAL TRAVELS, NO.5, A V ROAD, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU - 560002.

3. MR.B.SANAULLA KHAN, S/O LATE MR.B.P.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 50YEARS, NO 186, P.M.K.ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM , BENGALURU - 560004.

4. MR.B. SAMIULLA KHAN, S/O LATE MR B P BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, NATIONAL TRAVELS, NO.5, A.V.ROAD, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU - 560002.

5. MR. B. NOORULLA KHAN, S/O LATE MR.B.P. BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 47YEARS, NO 3, PARKALAMUTT BUILDING, TANK BUND ROAD, BENGALURU - 560009.

6 . S R I B A S A V A R A J U , S / O S R I B M C H I C K B A S A P P A , A G E D A B O U T 4 8 Y E A R S ,BESAGARAHALLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401.

7. SMT. JAYASHREE, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, KAGGALIPURA, TNARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT 570 001.

8. SMT LAKSHMI W/O SRI APPAJI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, HALLIKERE, MADDUR TALUK,MANDYA DISTRICT 571 401.

9 . SRI D NARENDRA, S/O SRI. D. LINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO 252,SWARNASANDRA, MANDYA- 571 401.

10. SRI K P VENUGOPAL, S/O SRI. K C PUTTEERE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,KIRGAVAL , MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT- 571 401.

11. SRI K N MADHUSUDHAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3RD CROSS, BESAGARAHALLI,MANDYA DISTRICT- 571 401.

12. SMT G V JAYALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, GOPALAPURA,MANDYS DISTRICT -571 401.

13. SMT M C JALAJAKSHI, W/O SRI R SHIVA SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,PROPRIETRIX, GAJANANA TRANSPORTS, ARAKERE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYADISTRICT- 571 401.

14. SRI H N KUMAR, S/O SRI NARASAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HULIKATTE, MAGADITALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT- 581 453.

15. SRI T H GOPAL, S/O LATE SRI HUTCHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, MADAHALLI,MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT -571 401.



16. SMT K V MEGHANA, D/O SRI K VAJRE GOWDA, AGED ABOTU 29 YEARS, NO 324, 9THMAIN, HALENAHALLI EXTENSION, MYSURU 570 001.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.R.SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTORYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAMANAGARAM , BY ITS SECRETARY -581 453.

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMAKURU, BY ITS SECRETARY -572 101.

4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA, BY ITS SECRETARY -571 401.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU - 560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THEENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD:5.8.2015 MARKED UNDERANNEXURE-B AND QUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER.


SRI. G.P.BHAKTAVATSALA, S/O. SRI. G. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.2006,3RD CROSS, SUBASHNAGARA, MANDYA - 571 401.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R.SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MANDYA - 571 401, BY ITS SECRETARY.


TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;



SRI HARISH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THERECORDS PERTAINING TO GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-B ANDQUASH THE SAID GOVERNMENT ORDER BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.


M A L A I M A H A D E S H W A R A S W A M Y K S H E T H R A D E V E L O P M E N T A U T H O R I T Y ,MAHADESHWARA HILLS, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT, BY ITSSECRETARY PIN- 571 490.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU - 560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313 BY ITSSECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HARISH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY OFTHE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 05.08.2015 ISSUED BY R-1 AT ANNEX-E AND THEPETITIONER MAY BE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SERVICES UNDER THEPERMITS NO.28/94-95, 46/99-2000 AND 35/99-2000 IN QUESTION PENDING DISPOSAL OFTHE ABOVE W.P.

W.P.NO. 37273/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. P. THIRUGNANAM S/O. DORAI SAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, KARADAGOOR VILLAGE,SRINIVASASANDRA POST, OORGAMPET, K.G.F.

KOLAR DISTRICT.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C M S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OFPARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS,VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.




3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR, BY ITS SECRETARY-563 101.

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI HARISH BHANDARY,ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT.5.8.2015 PASSED BYTHE R-2 UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT AS PERANNX-H.

W.P.NOS.117-118/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. R. RAGHUPATI GOWDA S/O SRI. D. RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARSMALLAKANAHALLI POST MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.

PIN-563 132.

2. MR. SARDAR PASHA S/O MR. MOHAMMED AMEERJAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OPP. TODARGA HAZARATH BABA HYDERVALLI, K.G.F. ROAD, MULBAGAL KOLAR DISTRICT PIN-563133.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M.E. NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BMTC BUILDING, KH ROAD BENGALURU-560 027BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BMTC BUILDING KHROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR BENGALURU-560 027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KH ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 AND R-2;

SRI HAREESH T BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DATED 16.04.2008 ATANNEXURE-E1 AND E2 AND THAT OF THE ORDER OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE



TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL 670/2012 AND 724/2012 DATED 01.08.2015 AT ANNEXURE-G.

W.P.Nos. 74-75/2015 BETWEEN:

MR. ABDUL MAJEED S/O MR.ABDUL KHADER, MAJOR BY AGE, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD,HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN-562 114.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. SRI V GOPI S/O SRI J VENKATACHALAMAIAH, BALAJI TRANSPORTS, BAMBOO BAZAAR,CHINTAMANI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT, PIN:563 125.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA SONDHI, SR. COUNSEL/ AAG A/W SRI. E.S. INDIRESH,AGA FOR R-1; SRI PUTTIGE R RAMESH, ADVOCATE A/W SRI HARISH BHANDARY T,ADVOCATE FOR R-3; NOTICE TO R-2 SERVED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OFTHE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITIONS NO.1472/12, & 728/12 DATED 26.11.2014, MARKED UNDER ANN-D, BY ISSUE OF AWRIT OF CERTIORARI.

W.P.NO.28047/2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI GOPALA REDDY S/O SRI. DODDAMUNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS VIJAYALAKSHMINILAYA ANJANI LAYOUT CHINTAMANI CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN-563 125.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.B.R. SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU CENTRAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. B.PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS



OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.804/2011 DATED 5.6.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.


SMT. V. SUMA W/O SRI. S.V. GANESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.85/A, 5TH CROSS 3RDBLOCK, THYAGARAJANAGAR BENGALURU-560 028.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.581/2000 DATED 6.3.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D FILED BY THE R-2.

W.P.NO.28887/2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI A.S. SHIVA KUMAR S/O SRI A. V. SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROPRIETOR,VIJAYA MOTORS, VIJAYAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 135.




SRI. B.PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.98/2015 DATED 5.6.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.



W.P NOS. 29614-29615/2015 BETWEEN SRI K R SOMASHEKARA REDDY S/O SRIRAJAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, LAVAKUSHA NAGARA, ELECTRONIC CITYPOST, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGLAURU-560 100.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL , B D A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BNEGLAURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FORR-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.NO.240 AND 241 OF 2011 DTD.6.4.2015VIDE ANNEX-D & E RESPECTIVELY.

W.P.NO.32417/2015:

BETWEEN:

SMT. REHANA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O SHEIKH SHAFIULLA NO.33, 11THCROSS SHAMPURA MAIN ROAD NEXT TO ASHRAFIA MOSQUE R.T. NAGAR POSTBENGALURU-560 032.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.VIJAY SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI M.E. NAGESH, ADVOCATE)AND:


2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. B.PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN REVISION PETITIONNO.188/2014 DATED 16.07.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-C.

W.P.NO.32501/2015:



BETWEEN:

MS. NAUSHEEN NAZ W/O MR. B.A. MUSHEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS V.M.MOTORS, NO.179, UDHANI LAYOUT CAMBRIDGE ROAD ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 008.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU CENTRAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY


SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.425/2012 DATED 20.06.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.

W.P.NO.33150/2015:

BETWEEN:

MR. MOINUDDIN S/O MR. SHABBIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.14/1, SECONDCROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.675/2012 DATED 4.5.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.

W.P.NO.33151/2015:

BETWEEN:



MS. ZEENATH KAUSER W/O MR. SHABBIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.14/1,SECOND CROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRSH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.638/2012 DATED 4.5.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OFCERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 33262-33263/2015 BETWEEN SRI N. SIDDARAMAPPA S/O LATE K. NINGAPPA,A G E D A B O U T 6 6 Y E A R S , P R O P R I E T O R - S . R . M . S , R / O K A D U R , C H I K M A G A L U RDISTRICT-577548.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S V KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT 1ST FLOOR, A-BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

2. THE KARNATKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGAORE-560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & 2;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTICE DATED 15.4.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-A AND ALSO THE IMPUGNEDORDER DTD.18.6.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL VIDE ANNEX-C.

WP NOS. 33268-33269/2015 BETWEEN:



SRI S.C. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O CHENNAVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, PROPRIETORMRUTHANJENAYA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O V.P.EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. VIJAYA SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI A ANANDA SHETTY ANDSRI. N. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE COMMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT 1ST FLOOR, A-BLOCK, T TMC BUILDING,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & 2;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTICE DATED 15.4.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-A AND ALSO THE IMPUGNEDORDER DATED 18.6.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL VIDE ANN-C.

WP NO 33270/2015 BETWEEN:

SRI S.V. MANJUNATH S/O S M VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PROPRIETORSUMALATHA MOTOR SERVICE, R/O KELAKOTE, CHITRADURGA- 577501 ... PETITIONER (BYSRI.A ANANDA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560027.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERDTD.18.6.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNALVIDE ANNEX-B.

WP NOS. 33271-33272/2015 BETWEEN:



SRI S. BASAVARAJ S/O LATE S MALLIKARJUNA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,P R O P R I E T O R - G A N E S H T R A V E L S , N A N D H I , 2 N D C R O S S , F I R S T L I N K R O A D ,PARVATHINAGAR, BELLARY- 583103 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.A ANANDA SHETTY,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT 1ST FLOOR, A BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560027

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BY ITS SECRETARY, TTMC BUILDING,K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE -560027.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE -560027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNEDNOTICE DATED 15.4.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-A AND ALSO THE IMPUGNEDORDER DATED 18.6.2015 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL VIDE ANN-C.

W.P.NOS.33834-33835/2015:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. ADILAKSHMI W/O LATE SRI GOPAL AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.9, PIPELINE,YESHAWANTHAPURA BENGALURU-560 022.

2. SRI R VENKATESH S/O SRI. RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS TEACHERS COLONYNO.192, SECOND CROSS SECOND MAIN, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B.R. SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:



SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSOF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION



PETITION NO.419/2012 AND 424/2012 DATED 10.04.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-G.

W.P.NO.33836/2015:

BETWEEN:

MR. MOINUDDIN S/O MR. SHABBIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.14/1, SECONDCROSS BANGIAPPA GARDEN SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 SRI.HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATEFOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.676/2012 DATED8.5.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.


T VENKATESAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O THIRUMALAPPA, R/O NO. 6, 17TH CROSS, 7THMAIN, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 0076.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SRIKANTH A & M R V ACHAR) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE RURALDISTRICT, BDA COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 034.

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE - 560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. S PRAKASH SHETTY FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.1206/2012DT.22.7.2015 VIDE ANNX-P.

WP NOS. 52472-52473/2015 BETWEEN:



1. SMT. REHANA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O SHAIK SHAFIULLA, NO.33,11THCROSS, SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD, NEXT TO ASHRAFIYA MASQ R T NAGAR POST,BANGALORE-560 032.

2. SHAIK SHAFIULLA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O LATE DAWOOD SAB, NO.33, 11TH CROSS,SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD, NEXT TO ASHRAFIYA MASQ R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BMTC BUILDING, KH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BMTC BUILDING, K HROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGER DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & 2)THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITYDTD:16.04.2008 AS PER ANNEXURE-E & E1 AND THAT OF THE ORDER OF THE STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL 616/2012 AND 617/2012 DTD:1.8.2015 AS PERANNEXURE-G.

W.P.NOS.54805-54808/2015:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. SADATHULLA S/O MR. M. ISMAIL SAB AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO.66, WARD NO.6,SULEMANKHAN STREET BONDIMOTTU BELLARY-583 101.

2. SRI. ALLAHBAKSH S/O MR. DADA PEER SAB AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NO.66, WARD NO.6,SULEMANKHAN STREET BONDIMOTTU BELLARY-583 101.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C.M.S SHARIEF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC COMPLEX, 'A'BLOCK, KH ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027.

2. SR.K. CHANDRASEKHAR PROP: KUSAMA MOTORS #-2, YASMIN SAB STREET WARD NO.23, COWL BAZAAR BELLARY-583 102.

3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONKH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;



SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYTHE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN REVISION PETITIONNO.34/2015 AND 124/2015 AND R.P.NOS.

32/2015 AND 129/2015 DATED 13.07.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-E & F RESPECTIVELY.

WP NO. 59047/2015 & WP No.378/2016 BETWEEN:

SMT SOWBHAGYA W/O SRI. S. VISHWARADHYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROPRIETIRIX,VIJAYANANDI MOTOR SERVICE, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN: 572 132.


1 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E T R A N S P O R T A U T H O R I T Y , B . M . T . C . , B U I L D I N G S ,SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARANTAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,

3. SRI G KRISHNAPPA S/O SRI GOVINDAPPA BUS OWNER, BANNINAGARA, SIRA,TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN:572 137.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;

SRI B.R. SHAILENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFKARANATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONSNO.1287/2012 AND 578/2013 DT.8.12.2015 V0IDE ANNX- D.

W.P.NO.123/2016:

BETWEEN:

MS. NAUSHEEN NAZ W/O MR. B.A. MUSHEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS V.M.MOTORS, NO.179, UDHANI LAYOUT CAMBRIDGE ROAD ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 008.





2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. M.S. HAREESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.689/2012 DATED 6.10.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-B BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OFCERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

W.P.NO.191/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI.S. RAJGOPAL GOWDA S/O LATE B. SAKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.446,14TH CROSS LAKKASANDRA, ADUGODI POST BANGALORE-560030.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.C.V. KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE TTMC BUILDING, KHROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

2. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TTMC BUILDING, KHROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KH ROAD SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 & 2;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDEROF THE R-1 DATED 16.11.2013 MADE IN SUBJECT NO. 199/99 (ANNEXURE-C) AND THEORDER OF THE KSTAT BANGALORE DATED 1.10.2015 MADE IN APPEAL NO.1956/2013(ANNEXURE-D).

WP Nos. 2704-2705/2016 BETWEEN:

SMT. NAFISA SULTANA D/O SRI.B.ABDUL LATIF, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.03, RATNAVIALS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHAILENDRAB R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY



2 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N K . H . R O A D ,SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS(BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI B.PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO. 704/2012 DATED4.5.2015 VIDE ANN-E AND IN RP NO. 183/2014 DATED 29.6.2015 AS PER ANN-F IN RESPECTOF PERMIT BEARING NO. 37/98-99 VALID UPTO 27.9.2018 FOR THE ROUTE TORALAKKI TOBENGALURU.

W.P.NOS.2804-2805/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI SAMPANGI RAME GOWDA S/O LATE D. RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARSDOMMASANDRA VILLAGE M.N. HALLI POST MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT PIN-563131 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.M.E. NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TTMC BUILDING, KH ROAD BENGALURU-560 027BY ITS SECRETARY

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH,AGA FOR R-1;

SRI HAREESH T BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INR.P.NO.475/2014 AND R.P.NO.480/2014 DATED 1.10.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-D.

WP Nos. 2806-2807/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI AGHA KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.C-7-777, BDA FLAT,AUSTIN TOWN BENGALURU-560 047. THE TRANSFEREE OF THE PERMIT HELD BY SMT.BANIJAN W/O LATE KAREEM KHAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGLAURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR.



3. J.V. SHIVAGANESH S/O VENKATA CHALAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS BAMBOO BAZARCHINTAMANI CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN -563 125.


SRI. M S HARISH KUMAR FOR R2;

SRI B.R. SUNDARAJA GUPTA ADVOCATE FOR R-3 THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.718/2012DT.25.6.2015 AS PER ANNX-F AND IN RP 68/2015 DT.5.6.2015 AS PER ANNX-G.

WP Nos. 3807-3808/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. KRISHNOJI RAO S/O. SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.422, 56TH CROSS,3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.



SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.410/2012 DTD. 10.4.2015 AS PER ANNX-E AND IN RP NO. 64/2015 DTD. 05.06.2015 AS PERANNX-F, IN RESPECT OF PERMIT BEARING NO.08/81-81 VALID UP TO 11.8.2019 FOR THEROUTE BENGALURU TO SHIVAGANGE AND BACK.

WP NOS. 3830-3831/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI D R RAJENDRA S/O SRI. RATHNAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO.320/2,"JAYADEVA BUILDINGS", B.T. ROAD, AGADI NURSING HOME, WILSON GARDEN ROAD,BENGALURU-560 027.

2. SRI SHASHIDHARA S/O SRI PUTTANARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, NO.14,MIRZA ROAD, ANEKAL, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106.




1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU URBAN, BENGALURU SOUTH,JAYANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 011, BY ITS SECRETARY.



SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN MISCELLANEOUSPETITION NO.45 OF 2015 DTD:4.9.2015 AND THE ORDER PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONNO.628 OF 2011 DTD:20.10.2015 MARKED AS ANNEXURES-G & H RESPECTIVELY.


SRI AGHA KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.C-7-777, BDA FLATAUSTIN TOWN BENGALURU-560047 THE TRANSFEREE OF THE PERMIT HELD BY NOORAHAMED.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA, COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION K H ROAD, BANGALORE-560027 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THESTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.414/2012 DTD:25.6.2015 AS PERANNEXURE-F.


SRI R H SURESH S/O HATTI RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROPRIETORSHIVAPRASAD MOTOR SERVICES BENGALURU ROAD CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGADISTRICT-577 522 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ANANDA SHETTY A AND SRI. N. RAJASHEKAR,ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY MULTI -STORIED BUILIDNG K RCIRCLE, BANGALORE-01.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE -27 BY ADM. DIRECTOR .. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THEAPPEALLATE TRIBUNAL IN REVISION PETITION NO.807/2012 DTD:11.9.2015 PRODUCEDHEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C.

WP NOS. 5451-5455/2016 BETWEEN:

SMT. FATHIMA BEGUM W/O. C. MOHAMMED NASRULLA SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,PROP: S.B. TRANSPORTS, ALI MOHALLA, 3RD BLOCK, CHITRADURGA.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TTMC COMPLEX, K.H. ROAD,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. B.G. MANOHAR S/O. B.M. GURAPPA, M/S. VISHWAS FUELS, OPPOSITE FIRE STATION, P.B.ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

3. B.G. MURUTYUNJAYA S/O. B.M. GURAPPA, M/S. VISHWAS FUELS, OPPOSITE FIRESTATION, P.B. ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001.


5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT HAVEN,HYDERABAD-861081.


SRI. R. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI A SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-4;

SRI L T GOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYIG TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYSTATE TRANSPORT TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.227/2013 AND 306/2013 DATED 18.11.2015 ATANNEX-H AND ORDER DATED 25.11.2015 MADE IN RP.840/2013, 849/2013 AND 850/2015 ATANNEX-J.




SRI. SALEEM KHAN S/O. LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGE: 56 YEARS, PROP: K.K. TRAVELS, VELLIAMMAN KOIL STREET, VIVEKANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 047, (TRANSFEREE OF THEPERMIT HELD BY SRI. S. NAZEER AHAMED) ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHAILENDRA B R,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.647/2012, DTD.4.5.2015AS PER ANNEX-D IN RESPECT OF PERMIT BEARING NO.E- 01/2000-01 FOR THE ROUTEMALUR TO BENGALURU AND BACK.


SRI. B.A. LINGAREDDY S/O. ANANTHREDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROP: SRE TRAVELS,HEAD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501.


1. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, T.T.M.C. COMPLEX, "A"BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU-560027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P.IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL IN REVISION PETITONNO.211/2012 DTD:18.6.2015 VIDE ANENXURE-C IN RESPECT OF THE PERMIT NO.08/91-92FOR THE ROUTE DAVANAGERE TO BELLARY AND BACK.

WP NOS. 5593-5594/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI B S SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE P. SUBBARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NO.76, 7THMAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-18.



... PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) BANGALORE RURAL B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-34 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD,BANGALORE-27 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER DTD:10.4.2015 PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONER NO.407/2012 IN RESPECT OFRENEWAL OF THE PERMIT NO.31/94-95 IN RESPECT OF THE ROUTE FROM BANGALORE TODABASPET AT ANNEXURE-E AND THE ORDER DTD:8.5.2015 PASSED IN R.P.NO.635/2012 INRESPECT OF RENEWAL OF THE PERMIT NO.12/91-92 IN RESPECT OF ROUTE FROMBANGALORE TO DODDABALAPUR AT THE ANENXURE-F OF THE KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE.


MS. SHAHANAZ SULTHANA W/O. LATE MR. MUNEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,MASTHI EXPRESS, MASTHI, KOLAR DISTRICT, PIN- 563 139.


1. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY B.M.T.C., BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN APPEAL NO.1276/2011DATED 14.07.2015 AT ANNEX-D.


MR J NAYAZ AHAMED S/O LATE ABDUL JALEEL, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OLD POST OFFICEROAD, ANDERSONPETE KGF, KOLAR-563 101 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA B R,ADVOCATE) AND:



1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE, KOLAR-563 101

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.440/2015 DTD.22.1.2016AS PER ANNEX-C IN RESPECT OF PERMIT BEARING NO.02/1999-2000 FOR THE ROUTENANGLI TO KGF AND BACK.


SRI T B NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE SRI.T.Y.BASAVA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,P R O P R I E T O R S R I N I V A S A M O T O R S E R V I C E , C . K . P U R A , N E A R A K A S H A W A N I ,CHITRADURGA-577501 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE)AND:

1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORTS AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.M.T.C. BUILDINGS, FIRST FLOOR, SHANTHINAGAR,BENGALURU-560027

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR . . .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONNO.205/2012 DT.18.6.2015 VIDE ANNX-B BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


SRI. K. MAHABADRAPPA, S/O. SRI. K. VEERABADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,PROPRIETOR, MALLIKARJUNA MOTOR SERVICE, GANDHINAGARA, CHALLAKERE,CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, PIN: 577 522.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R.SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORTS AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT AUTHORITY, B.M.T.C., BUILDINGS, FIRST FLOOR, SHANTHINAGAR,BENGALURU - 560 027.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1; SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR,ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITON NO.212/2012 DATED18.6.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-B.

WP NO. 6769/2016 & WP. NOS.7341-7342/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI N MURALI S/O CHINNA SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, C/O SRIDHAR, RAMPURA,MOLAKALMURU TQ-577 535 CHITRADURGA DIST.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.NAGARAJ H B, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (KSTA), TTMC BUILDING, K.H. ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND THE SECRETARY, K.S.T.A, TTMCBUILDING, K.H. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027.

3 . T H E K A R N A T A K A S T A T E R O A D T R A N S P O R T C O R P O R A T I O N , K . H . R O A D ,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS SECRETARY

4. SRI. SANDHEEP. T S/O THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, S.V.M.S.J.B. SATHEESH COMPOUND, MOLAKALMURU TQ- 577 535, CHITRADURGA DIST.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-2;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;

SRI. R. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INIDA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BYTHE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 15.7.2015 INR.P.NO.785/2010 AND 1067/2012 AT ANNX-F AND R.P.NO.617/2014 DATED 17.7.2015 ATANNX-H BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OFDIRECTION AS THE CASE MAY BE.


SRI AGHA KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NO.C-7-7777, BDA FLAT,AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE-47 THE PROPOSED TRANSFEREE OF THE PERMIT HELD BYSMT. BANIJAN W/O LATE KAREEM KHAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M E NAGESH,



ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA , BANGALORE-34 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE-27 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERSPASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.698/2012 DATED4.5.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-F.

W.P.NOS.8241-8244/2016 BETWEEN:

1. KHAYUM KHAN, S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.10, 1ST MAINROAD, 5TH CROSS, LAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 009.

2 . SALEEM KHAN, S/O. LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.10,CORPORATION BUILDING, KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TUMKUR, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S INDIRESH. AGA FOR R-1; SRI. M.S.HARISHKUMAR,ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.NOS.770/2011, 771/2011, 772/2011 AND 773/2011DATED 8.6.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E.


MR. ABDUL KHAYUM S/O MR.ABDUL KHADER, AGED AOBUT 31 YEARS, OLD POST OFFICEROAD, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 114.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITITUON OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF KARANTAKASTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REV. PETITION NO.727/2012DT.8.5.2015 FILED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNX-B BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS.8514-8515/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. HABEEBULLA KHAN S/O BAKSHU KHAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.786,FORT, KOLAR-563101.

2. SRI ATHAULLA KHAN S/O BAKSHU KHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.786, FORTKOLAR-563 101 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C V KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR-563 101 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLAR-563 101

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560 027 KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & 2;

SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMONORDER OF KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALOREDT.22.1.2016 MADE IN REVISION PETITION NO.439/2015 AND 441/2015 (ANNX-E).


SRI HAFEEZ KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP: K K TRAVELS, #35/36, RICHMOND ROAD ASHOKNAGARA BENGLAURU-560 050 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHAILENDRA B R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL BDA COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;



SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S. ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.662/2012 DATED 4.5.2015AS PER ANNX-C IN RESPECT OF PERMIT BEARING NO.46/1997-98 FOR THE ROUTECHIKKATHIRUPATHI TO BENGALURU AND BACK.

W.P.NOS.9231-9235/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. J.V.SHIVA GANESH, S/O. SRI. J. VENKATACHALAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT42 YEARS, BALAJI TRANSPORTS, CHINTAMANI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT,PIN: 563 125.

2. SRI. V. GEETHESH, S/O. SRI. A.V.C.VEERABADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31YEARS, PROPRIETOR, VIJAYA MOTOR SERVICE, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLITALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN: 562 135.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.R.SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INREVISION PEITITONS NO.82, 86, 94, 95 AND 81/2015 DATED 5.6.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-L BYISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER ORDIRECTION.

WP NOS. 9285-9286/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. N. S. SHIVAKUMAR S/O. SARABAPPA SOGI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 1ST CROSS,RAVINDRA NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA, PIN-577 202.


1. THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TTMC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD,BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS SECETARY.




... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA GOVT ADV FOR R1;

SRI B PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL DTD:5.10.2015 IN NO.RP286/2015 AND 287/2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-H1 & H2.

WP NOS. 9305-9308/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI.M.SHARATH S/O SRI.S.MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, SANDHYA TOURS ANDTRAVELS, NO.21/14, T.S.P ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560 002

2. SRI.J.MUNIRAJU S/O SRI.B.A. JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, #5, GROWER ROAD,BANGALORE-560 005.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C NARASIMHACHAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDACOMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 036.

2. KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K.H.ROAD,BANGALORE-560 027.

.. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDER OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.791/2011 DATED06.04.2015 AND R.P.73, 75 & 79/2015 DATED 05.06.2015 AT ANNEX-E & F.

W.P.NOS.9603-9604/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. A.V.C. VEERABADRAPPA, S/O. SRI. CHICKAPPAIAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, POSTOFFICE ROAD, VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN:562 135.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A., COMPLEX,KORMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.




SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADV., FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INR.P.NOS.420 AND 690/2012 DATED 10.4.2015 AND 8.5.2015 AT ANNEXURE-E AND FRESPECTIVELY.

W.P.NOS.9662-9663/2016 BETWEEN:

P.NAZEER AHMED, S/O. MOOSA SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.842, GOWRIPET MAINROAD, NEW HEAD POST OFFICE, KOLAR 563 101.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIKANTH A, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE SECRETARY/ADDL.

COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT, KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMCCOMPLEX, A BLOCK, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC COMPLEX A BLOCK, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1 AND R2;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADV., FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRERECORDS AND TO QUASH THE COMMON ORDER PASSED BY KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.431/2015 AND 432/2015 ORDER DATED 1.2.2016AT ANNEXURE-J.

W.P.NOS.9727-9728/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. KHAYUM KHAN, S/O. LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.98/101,R.V.COMPLEX, KALASIPALYA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.E.NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:




2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADV., FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRERECORDS AND TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL IN R.P.636/2012 AND 696/2012 DATED 4.5.2015 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND F.


SRI. J. SATHYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE SRI. JAIMUNI RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.174,1ST MAIN ROAD, ST. LAWRENCE HIGH SCHOOL, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU, PIN: 560079.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY, ADV., FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INR.P.646/2012 DATED 8.6.2015 AT ANNEXURE-C.


SRI. HAFEEZ KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGE 60 YEARS, NO.98/101, R V COMPLEXKALASIPALYA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560002 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA., COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION K H ROAD, BANGALORE-560027 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;



SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THESTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.NO.69/2015 DT.5.6.2015 AS PERANNEXURE-D.


1. MR. SYED AFSAR S/O MR. SYED AHMED, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO. 21, MASJID BILALROAD, NEWPET, ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106.

2. MR. AZMATHULLAKHAN S/O MR. BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, NO.13, 8TH CROSS, SOMESHWARANAGAR, JAYANAGAR, 1ST BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 027.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU URBAN, JAYANAGAR SHOPPINGCOMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 011. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034. BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OFTHE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.555/2012 DT.2.3.2015 & 354/2013 DT.18.4.2015 VIDE ANNX-E & F BY ISSUE OF AWRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


MR. ABDUL KHALEEM S/O MR.MOHAMMED HAYATH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.68,D-CROSS, B.C.C. COLONY, 4TH T-BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011.


1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU-MYSURU ROAD,RAMANAGARAM-571 511

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .



RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONNO.485/2015 DT.25.1.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-D BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANYOTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


SRI. G. GOVINDARAJU, S/O. SRI. GANGADHARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.147/19,ANANTHARAMAIAH COMPOUND, CHAMARAJAPETE, BENGALURU - 560 018.


1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU - MYSURU ROAD,RAMANAGARAM-571 511.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDERS OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED INR.P.331/2015 DATED 1.12.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.


SRI. M. SHARTH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O. SRI. S. MANOHAR, M/S. SANDHYA TOURSAND TRAVELS, NO.21/14, TSP ROAD, KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE - 560 002. TRANSFEREEOF PERMIT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. NARASIMHACHAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 036, BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHINAGARA, K.H.ROAD,BANGALORE - 560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER



DATED 1.9.2015 PASSED IN R.P.181/2014 IN RESPECT OF RENEWAL OF PERMITNO.43/1994-95 FOR THE ROUTE FROM HOLAVANAHALLI TO BANGALORE VIDEANNEXURE-E.


SRI ANIL KUMAR S/O LATE S. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS FORT STREET,KALASIPALYAM BANGALORE-02 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. C M S SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLAR REGION, REGIONALTRANSPORT OFFICE KOLAR-563101

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, K.H. ROAD, BANGALORE-27BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.326/2015 DATED 19.11.2015AT ANNEX-C IN RESPECT OF PERMIT BEARING NO.01/2003-2004 FOR THE ROUTEBENGALURU TO TAYALURU AND BACK.


MR. SYED IBRAHIM S/O MR.SYED KAREEM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.672, MASJID ROAD,31ST CROSS, THILAK NAGAR, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041.


1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P. NO.421 OF 2012DTD:10.4.2015 MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-E.


SRI G KRISHNA MURTHY S/O SRI S GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO. 63, FORT 'B'STREET, KALASIPALAYAM, BENGALURU - 560 002.




1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU CENTRAL, B.D.A. COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.189/2014 DATED29.06.2015 AT ANNEXURE-B.

WP NOS. 10813-814/2016 BETWEEN:

1. MR ABDUL REHAMAN S/O MR.ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, "SAILANISHANMAKHAN", O.P.O.ROAD, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 114

2. MR.ABDUL HAMEED S/O MR.ABDUL AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, "SAILANISHANMAKHAN", O.P.O.ROAD, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 114 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, B.D.A.COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.

BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR . . .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.NO.1208 OF 2012AND 1212 OF 2012 DTD:5.6.2015 MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-C BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OFCERTIORARI.


SRI RAMESH T S/O LATE THIRUMALAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS NO.6, 17TH CROSS 7THMAIN, B T M LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 076 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BEGNALURU RURAL BDA COMPLEXKORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 034 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K H ROAD BANGALORE-560 027 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

3. HAFEEZ KHAN AGE MAJOR NO.35, K H TRAVELS RICHMOND ROAD ASHOK NAGARBENGALURU-560 025 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS QUASH THEORDER PASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.638/2013 DATED02.11.2015 AT ANNEX-H AND THAT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RTA, BENGALURURURAL DATED 07.02.2013 AT ANNEX-E;


1. SRI. G.V. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SRI G T VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50YEARS, PROPRIETOR SRI VINAYAKA MOTOR SERVICE NO.11-12, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD,KALASIPALYAM BANGALORE-560002

2. SRI M C VENKATESHAMURTHY S/O M V CHANDRASHEKARMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 46YEARS, NO.5, CHURCH STREET, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.S.V.KRISHNASWAMY & SRI C V KUMAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC BUILDING, K HROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027.

2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SANTHINAGAR,BANGALORE-560027, PRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. M/S TAMIL NADU STATE ROAD TRANSPORT (SALEM) CORPORATION, BHARATHIPURAM,SALEM MAIN ROAD, DHARMAPURI TAMIL NADU, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HARISH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;

SRI B.N. JAYADEVA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMONORDER OF THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALOREDT.29.2.2016 MADE IN REVISION PETITION NO.768/2011, 769/2011, 100/2012 & 101/2012(ANNX-D).



WP NOS. 22654-22661/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI HAFEEZ KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO.98/101, R VCOMPLEX, KALASIPALYA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560002

2. SRI AGHA KHAN S/O LATE KAREEM KHAN AGE 58 YEARS, NO.98/101, R V COMPLEXKALASIPALYA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560002 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M E NAGESH,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND THE SECRETARY, STATE TRANSPORTAUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, BMTC COMPLEX, K H ROAD, BANGALORE-560027

2. THE KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGARBANGALORE-560027 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

3. SMT REHENA BEGUM W/O SHEIKH SHAFIULLA NO.33, NEW NO.8, 11TH CROSS,SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD, R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560032 ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR-3;

SRI. M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERPASSED BY THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP.NO.27/2016, 28/2016,29/2016, 30/2016, 121/2016, 122/2016, 123/2016 AND 124/2016 DT.4.4.2016 AS PER ANNX-G.


SRI. R N KENCHARAJAIAH S/O SRI.R.K.NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUSOPERATOR, OLD DIARY ROAD, CHINTAMANI, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563125 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORTS AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, FIRST FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, T.T.M.C. BUILDING, KENGALHANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI M.S.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.53/2016DT.24.2.2016 VIDE ANNX-C BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER



APPROPRIAT WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.

WP NOS. 24721-24722/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI. C. JAGANNATH S/O LATE SRI D N CHICKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARSB E H I N D R A G H A V E N D R A S W A M Y T E M P L E , N R E X T E N S I O N , C H I N T A M A N I ,CHICKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN-567 123

2. SRI C VENUGOPAL S/O LATE SRI D N CHICKAVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARSBEHIND S B M BUILDING, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 132 ... PETITIONERS (BYSRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, FIRST FLOOR, "A"-BLOCK, T.T.M.C.BUILDING, KENGALHANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILEDUNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THEORDERS OF KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITION NO.54/2016 DT.18.4.2016 VIDE ANNX-C BY ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.


M/S VENKATESWARA TRAVELS NO.6, 17TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, BTM LAYOUT,BENGALURU-560076 BY ITS PROP. T.VENKATESH, S/O TIRUMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.M E NAGESH, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU RURAL, BDA COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560039 BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE-560027 BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THESTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN RP NO.534/2012 DTD.18.4.2015 VIDEANNEX-E.




SMT S J SHANTHA W/O LATE S.R.JAGADEESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS MADHURI MOTORSSERVICE, SHIVAGANGA POST CHITRADURGA TQ & DIST PIN-577501. ... PETITIONER (BYSRI.ANANDA SHETTY A AND SRI N RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BY ITS SECRETARY, CHITRADURGA-577 501

2. C.MOHAMMED NAZRULLAH SHARIEFF S/O C. SHEIK AMEER SAB AGED 58 YEARS PROPS.B.TRANSPORT ALI MOHALLA, CHITRADURGA PIN-577 501

3 . K S R T C R E P . B Y I T S M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R , C E N T R A L O F F I C E , K . H . R O A DBANGALORE-560 027 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-A PASSED BY THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.466/2012 DATED 15.09.2015.

WP NOS. 28647-28648/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI. NAGARAJA S/O.SRI MADE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, NO.336, 7TH CROSS,LAKSHMI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.


1. THE SECRETARY REGIONL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, OPP. GHOUSIA COLLEGE, MYSURUROAD, RAMANAGARAM-571511.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1;

SRI M.S HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OFTHE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISIONPETITIONS NO.135 AND 137/2016 DATED 27.04.2016 AT ANNEX-E.

WP NOS. 28649-28653/2016 & W.P.NOS.28654- 28655/2016 BETWEEN:

SMT N ROOPASHREE W/O SRI P SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX,JATIN MOTORS, MARAGONDANAHALLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT PIN:571430 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, NEAR GHOUSIA COLLEGE,MYSURU ROAD, RAMANAGARAM - 571511



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR .. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI.M S HARISH KUMAR FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN R.P.NO.453, 475, 478,480, 482, 483, 484 OF 2015 DTD.25.1.2016 VIDE ANNEX-Q.

W.P. NO. 29681/2016 BETWEEN ABDUL SALEEM S/O. MOHAMMED HAYATH, AGED ABOUT48 YEARS, NO.20, "F" STREET, TSP KALASIPALYAM, BANGALORE-560 002.


1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, NEAR GHOUSIA COLELGE,MYSORE ROAD, RAMANAGARAM-571 511.

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


SRI M.S HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONNO;139/2016 DTD:27.4.2016 MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-D WP. NO. 30450/2016 BETWEEN:

MR. B REHAMATHULLA KHAN S/O LATE MR.B.P.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, NO.186, P.M.K.ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM BENGALURU-560 004.


1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, NEAR GHOUSIA COLLEGEMYSURU ROAD RAMANAGARAM-571 511

2. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAHROAD SHANTHINGAR BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR . . .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI M.S. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS OF THEKARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN REVISION PETITIONNO.146/2016 DATED 10.5.2016 MARKED UNDER ANNEXURE-C.



W.P. Nos. 30637-30644/2016 & 30647-30651/2016 BETWEEN:

1. SRI NAGARAJU S/O SRI RANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, KAGGALIPURAT.NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571119

2. SMT. SHIVALINGAMMA W/O LATE SRI MAHADEVU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.269,SECOND CROSS, CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGARA MANDYA-571425.

3. SRI.K.VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR KALMANTHI DODDIMANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571425

4. SRI.D.RAJU S/O SRI.D.LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SWARNA SANDRAMANDYA-571425

5. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O SRI. A.S.BORE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PROPRIETRIXGAJANANA MOTOR SERVICE SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571425

6. SRI.A.R.SHIVASHANKAR S/O SRI.A.S.RAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS PROPRIETORG A J A N A N A M O T O R S E R V I C E A R A K E R E S R I R A N G A P A T N A T A L U K M A N D Y ADISTRICT-571425

7. SMT. PUTTAMANCHAMMA W/O LATE SRI MADE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, NO.777,3RD CROSS, B.V.NAGARA, KALLAHALLI MANDYA-571425

8. SRI.L.SATHISH S/O SRI. LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 1ST CROSS, SHIVANANJAPPAEXTENSION MANDYA-571425

9. SRI.N.S.CHANDRU S/O LATE SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, HARSHITHA NILAYA4TH CROSS, GUTHALU ROAD MANDYA-571425

10. SRI.S.N.MANCHE GOWDA S/O SRI NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,SABBENAHALLI YEDAGANAHALLI POST MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571425 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B R SUNDARARAJA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RAMANAGARAM-571511 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MANDYA-571511 BY ITS SECRETARY

4. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROADBENGALURU-560 27 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR . . . RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.



E.S.INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1-R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAYOF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD. 05.8.2015 MARKED UNDER ANNX-B AND THEPETITIONERS MAY BE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SERVICES UNDER THEPERMITS IN QUESTION AS PER THE LIST MARKED UNDER ANNX-C PENDING IN DISPOSALOF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITIONS.

W.P. NO. 8606/2017 BETWEEN:

SMT. GAJALAKSHMI W/O. LATE C. RAJA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.25, 7THMAIN ROAD, 8TH CROSS, N.R. LAYOUT, GARVEBHAVIPALYA, BENGALURU-560 068.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE ADDITIONAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKA STATETRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC, I FLOOR, "A" BLOCK, BMTC BUILDINGS, K.H. ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H. ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FPR R-1 & R-2;

SRI H.M. MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 &227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS OF THEGOVERNMENT ORDER DTD:5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-1 MARKED ANNEXURE-B TO THEABOVE W.P.

W.P. NO. 58692/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI B G MRUTHUNJAYA S/O LATE GURAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/A BEHIND M/SVISWAS FUELS OPPOSITE FIRE STATION P B ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 001.

... PETITIONER (BY SRI.LOKESH R, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTRANSPORT DEPARTMENT MULTISTOREYED BUILDINGS DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBENGALURU-560 001.



2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, K H ROAD SHANTHINAGAR TTMCBUILDINGS, I FLOOR A BLOCK, BMTC COMPLEX BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS SECRETARY

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES K H ROAD,SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2;

SRI B PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 05.08.2015ISSUED BY THE R-1 AT ANNEX-A TO THE ABOVE W.P.

W.P. NOs. 18565-18566/2016 BETWEEN:

SRI B G MRUTHUNJAYA S/O LATE GURAPPA AGED 57 YEARS, R/A BEHIND M/S VISWASFUELS OPPOSITE FIRE STATION, P.B.ROAD DAVANAGERE-577001.


1. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, I FLOOR, A BLOCK, TTMC COMPLEX,BMTC BUILDINGS, K.H.ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. SRI.C.MOHAMMED NASRULLA SHARIEF S/O C. SHAIK AMEER SAB, AGED MAJOR, PROP:S.B.TRANSPORTS, ALI MOHALLA CHITRADURGA-577 501.

3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROADSHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BYSRI. E.S. INDIRESH, AGA FOR R-1;

SRI C M S SHARIFF, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;

SRI B. PHALAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THECOMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL DTD.15.3.2016 IN RP NO.843/2013AND R.P.859/2013 VIDE ANNEX-E.

THESE PETITIONS BEING HEARD AND RESERVED, COMING ON FOR PRNOUNCEMENT OFORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER These writ petitions have been filed by tourist bus operators for quashing of theGovernment Order bearing No.SARE/140/SAEPA-2011, Bengaluru dated 05.08.2015 whereunderappropriate Government of Karnataka has opined that modification of the schemes proposed underthe notifications dated 25.10.2002, 27.05.2003 & 09.03.2017 are not required to be modified and assuch, has dropped the proposed modifications and are referred to as "first set of writ petitions.". TheStage Carriage Permit Holders who were granted permits by the State Transport Authority, being



aggrieved by the orders passed by the said Authority rejecting the applications for renewal of thepermits preferred appeals before the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore andon dismissal of the appeals by the Tribunal on the ground that the Division Bench of this Court hadheld that such permit holders are not exempted operators within the meaning of the respectiveschemes have approached this Court in the writ petitions which is referred to as "second set of writpetitions". Since common questions would arise for consideration in these writ petitions, they aretaken up together and disposed of by this common order. For the purposes of convenience, they areclassified and tabulated hereunder:

Writ petitions whereunder notification dated 05.08.2015 is under challenge.

(FIRST SET) 33823-825/2015 & 34039/2015 34672-676/2015 36182-184/2015 36516/201536672-676/2015 36776-780/2015 37020-021/2015 37085-089/2015 37260-261/201537268-270/2015 37424-427/2015 & 37583- 592/2015 37725/2015 37945/2015 38265-269/2015901/2015 & 38952-953/2015 38950-951/2015 & 42696- 706/2015 39348-351/201539359-363/2015 39369-373/2015 40153-154/2015 40275-279/2015 40572-576/2015 & 40577-581/2015 42035-039/2015 & 42040- 042/2015 & 42043-047/2015 42522-524/201543118-43119/2015 & 43122/2015 42724-728/2015 a/w 34265- 279/2015 43112/2015 43224/201545171/2015 43851/2015 44544/2015 45555/2015 49748-751/2015 791/15 & 52792-794/201554555-561/2015 54766-767/2015 56060-064/2015 57348-349/2015 1676-1677/2016 2208/2016 &2209/2016 3634-3635/2016 9950-52/2016 35649/2015 30647-651/2016 Writ petitionswhereunder Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore orders are under challenge :

(SECOND SET) 27991-27993/2012 59378/2016 7342/2016 28654-655/2016HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:

2. In exercise of the power vested under Section 68D of MV Act, 1939 StateGovernment approved certain schemes during 1960, 1961, 1968 and on various otherdates which are known and called as "BTS scheme, Bellary Scheme, Kolar Scheme,Mysore Scheme etc." so as to create monopoly in favour of State Transportundertakings in respect of the routes notified thereunder.

One such scheme which known as 'BTS Scheme' was published on 16.01.1961 in relation to the areacomprising Bangalore City Corporation Limits including the adjacent mofussil / areas. The saidscheme was under challenge before this Court, whereunder it was held that the scheme does notprohibit mofussil services going beyond the notified area. Full Bench of this Court in KSRTC vsASHRAFULLA KHAN in W.A.No.403/1988 held it was permissible to traverse on the notifiedroutes/area which fall within village and town limits as a matter of necessity. This view came to bereversed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of KSRTC vs ASHRAFULLA KHAN reported in AIR2002 SC 629.

Several schemes like Bellary Scheme, Kolar Scheme, Bangalore and Kanakapura Plans - MysoreScheme and BTS Scheme, which were in operation in the State of Karnataka was sought to bemodified to the extent that the operation of the services by permit holders who have been granted



permits to ply the services on interstate routes, inter-district routes and intra-district routes asmorefully specified in the proposed modified notifications. The Karnataka State Road TransportCorporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation') had filed objections urging various groundsfor opposing the said draft Modification Schemes contending interalia that there is no need ornecessity for modifying the Schemes or for regularizing the illegal permits that have been grantedcontrary to the Scheme and modification of the Schemes cannot be done except in case ofrequirement of public interest.

However, by overruling the objections raised by Corporation, notifications dated 07.11.2003,24.07.2003, and 31.05.2007 came to be issued.

3. Said modification / notifications issued by the State Government came to be questioned by theCorporation in W.P.Nos.4030/2004 (Bellary Scheme), 6616/2004 (Kolar Scheme), 158/2008(Bangalore & BTS Schemes) and W.P.No.9590/2004 (relating to MM Hills vehicles). Division Benchof this Court by order dated 21.04.2011 allowed the said writ petition and set aside the notificationdated 31.05.2007 and matter was remitted to the State Government to pass fresh orders inaccordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.The writ petitions filed by the private operators came to be dismissed by confirming the orderpassed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal whereunder the permits granted in favour of thewrit petitioners therein had been cancelled. However, the Division Bench permitted the petitionersin W.P.No.16990/2006 and connected matters to operate their vehicles, if they are holding permitswhich were valid as on the said date and if they are authorized to run the vehicles for a period ofthree (3) months from the date of the order.

4. The private operators approached the Hon'ble Apex Court against the order setting aside thenotification dated 31.05.2007 in SLP No.20539-

561/2011 and connected cases. The Hon'ble Apex Court by order dated 18.12.2014 dismissed theSpecial Leave Petitions and directed the State Government to hear the objections, consider anddecide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned order within three (3) months and in the lightof direction issued by Apex Court directing the State Government to hear the objections of theCorporation and also the plea of discrimination raised by few operators, by considering and decidingthe same in accordance with law, a notification dated 07.02.2015 came to be issued by the StateGovernment. Under the notification dated 19.02.2015 hearing date was fixed as 07.03.2015 at 11.00a.m. so as to hear the objections / suggestions already received to the draft notifications and noticeswere duly issued. Under the said notification dated 07.02.2015 Additional Chief Secretary, RuralDevelopment and Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Karnataka came to be authorized tohear the objections/suggestions received in respect of draft notifications dated 25.10.2002 (Bellaryscheme), 27.05.2003 (Kolar scheme) and 09.03.2007 (Mysore/ Bangalore/ BTS/ Kanakapuraschemes). Thereafter, hearing was held on 07.03.2015 and after hearing the parties and theirrepresentatives, the hearing authority concluded and recommended to the State Government asunder:



(i) "The necessity for the modification of the approved scheme contained in the draftnotification is not established. As discussed above while there is general agreementthat the approved scheme has to be modified in view of lapse of time, themodification should have specific particulars of the nature of the services proposed tobe rendered, the area or the routes proposed to be covered, the overlapping portionsproposed to be exempted and other relevant particulars respecting thereto asrequired under Section 99(1) of the M.V.Act, 1988.

(ii) All the permits issued on the notified routes or overlapping them after the date of the originaldraft/final notification of the original scheme are illegal.

(iii) Firstly, there would be discrimination as against applicants who applied for permits but wererejected while others on the same footing were granted if such grantees were saved. The existence ofsuch cases have been referred to during the arguments. Secondly, fixing any cut off date isdiscriminatory against some operators who may have got their permits after the cut-off date. Savingoperators who have got permits before the cut-off date would discriminate against operators whogot permits after the cut-off dates. Therefore all the three notifications are discriminatory becausethey specify certain cut-off dates.

(iv) In view of the above, further proceedings on these draft notifications referred to in para 9 abovemay be dropped."

Pursuant to the same, the State Government has passed the impugned Government Order dated05.08.2015 dropping the notifications dated 25.10.2002, 27.05.2003 and 09.03.2007.

5. In the meanwhile, some of the stage carriage permit holders who had unsuccessfully urged beforevarious forums for restoring the permits and seeking renewal of their permits which had beenrejected by the jurisdictional Regional Transport Authorities (for short RTAs) had approached theTribunal by filing appeals under Section 89(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'MV Act')and Tribunal by orders passed in the respective appeals as noticed in the tabular column formulatedhereinabove under the second set of category, dismissed the appeals on the ground that earlier orderpassed by the Tribunal in various revision petitions had attained finality and the revision petitionsfiled by the Corporation challenging the renewal of permits granted in favour of the second categoryof writ petitioners came to be set aside on the ground that such permits have been granted withoutconducting joint route survey and the Hon'ble Apex Court in B.A.Lingareddy's case had rejected thecontention of the permit holders.

6. Thus, two sets of writ petitions have been filed challenging the validity and legality of the G.O.

dated 05.08.2015 and the orders passed by the Tribunal dismissing the appeals of the bus operatorsand allowing the revision petitions filed by the Corporation by raising common grounds andquestions of law. Hence, all these writ petitions are taken up together for consideration anddisposed off by this common order.



7. I have heard the arguments of Sriyuths S.Vijayashankar, learned Senior Advocate, Sriyuths BRSGupta, C.V.Kumar, Siddananjaiah, C.M.S.Sharief, M.E.Nagesh, B.R.Shailendra, H.B.Nagaraja,Srikanth, Ananda Shetty, A, A.S.Prasanna Kumar, R.Lokesh, C Narasimhachar, B.G.Raghuram,learned Advocates appearing for petitioners and Sri Ashok Haranahalli, learned Senior Advocateappearing for Corporation, Sri Adithya Sondhi, learned Additional Advocate General appearing forthe State, Sriyuths Puttige R Ramesh, Prakash Shetty, M.S.Harish Kumar, B.Palakshaiah, HareeshBhandary T, learned Advocates appearing for the respondents / Corporations.

CONTENTIONS RAISED BY THE PETITIONERS:

8. Sri S Vijaya Shankar, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of Sriyuths M.E.Nagesh, AnandShetty and Rajashekhar, learned Advocates would contend that the scheme itself is a law underArticle 13 (2) of the Constitution of India and the body which made said scheme alone has power toamend or rescind and contends that provisions governing the said issue will have to be construedstrictly. He would submit that the rule making authority being the Minister would be theappropriate authority to amend the rule and if it authorizes the Secretary, it is excessive delegationand Secretaries cannot be the Government. He draws the attention of the Court to Section 2(60)(b)of the General Clauses Act which indicates the definition of 'State Government'. By drawing theattention of the Court to Rule 5, 7, 10 and 30 of Allocation of Business Rules as contemplated underArticle 166(3) of the Constitution of India, to contend that it is only the Minister who is entitled tohear, decide and dispose of the objections and to substantiate said proposition, he relies upon thejudgment in the case of GULLAPALLI NAGESWARA RAO AND OTHERS vs. ANDHRA PRADESHSTATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1959 SC 308. Hewould also contend that when a judicial act is done, the person who hears alone should pass theorder as it would falll within the four corners of the 'judicial act' as held by the Apex Court in thecase of GULLAPALLI NAGESWARA RAO referred to supra and relies upon paragraph 24 of the saidjudgment.

He would contend that State is a juristic person and it is not the Secretary. He would refer to Section102 of MV Act to contend that it prescribes the procedure to be adopted by State Government eitherwhile canceling or modifying a scheme and there is no power given by the statute under Section 107of the MV Act to formulate Rules either delegating or otherwise and under Section 102 there cannotbe any delegation and State Government alone will have to adjudicate.

He would also draw the attention of the Court that hearing authority has relied upon the judgmentof the learned Single Judge passed on 06.01.2011 in W.P.No.6507/2008 without considering theorder passed in W.A.No.1408/2011 dated 08.06.2011 whereunder the order of the learned SingleJudge came to be set aside. This fact itself would indicate that there has been total non-applicationof mind by the hearing authority. He would rely upon the following judgments:

(i) (2003)3 SCC 472 CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, GOVT. OF A.P. Vs. COLLECTOR ANDORS.

(ii) AIR 1992 SC 443 APSRTC vs P.V.RAMAMOHAN



CHOWDHARY

9. Sri BRS Gupta, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner would contend that if Governmentfinds that in order to provide an efficient and well coordinated transport services to the travelingpublic it would be entitled to modify the scheme so as to permit a private operator to ply his vehicleon such routes and in any case, it is always permissible for the legislature to amend the law byproviding private operators to run transport services on such route or routes and on payment ofadequate royalty to the State Government.

He would submit that for this precise reason, the State Government modified the scheme ascontemplated under Section 102 namely, Kolar Scheme by granting exemption up to 2003 namely,those permits which were in operation as on 2003. He would submit that likewise, Bellary Scheme,Bangalore, Mysore BTS, Kanakapura and Shimoga Schemes and other schemes were also modifiedto save those permits which were granted as on 2007. He would contend that earlier to the proposedmodification of the schemes, there were modifications and the Corporation has not questioned thesame and only the exemptions under the dropped notifications which were granted by the StateGovernment subsequent to the judgment of the Apex Court in ASHRAFULLA's case Corporation hasquestioned the modifications before the Division Bench.

He would contend that Division Bench of this Court only on the ground that while modifying thescheme, State Government has not assigned reasons and it is not a speaking order had set aside theorder of exemption pertaining to those schemes and had remitted the matter back to the StateGovernment for re-consideration and this was questioned by private operators before the ApexCourt in the case of B.A.LINGAREDDY ETC. vs KSTA and batch matters and the Apex Court on25.07.2011 had granted an interim stay of the judgment of the Division Bench, by virtue of which,the State Transport Authority's had renewed the permits of petitioners and similarly placed personsand subject to LINGAREDDY judgment. He would draw the attention of this Court to the judgmentof LINGAREDDY's case whereunder Apex Court has given a direction to the State Government topass a speaking order and pray for this Court to take note of paragraphs 38 & 39 of said judgment.

He would also submit that some of the permits granted were illegally cancelled since it was beyondthe cut-off date and the very fixation of cut-off date is discriminatory as it would create monopoly infavour of private operators who are operating the vehicles as on the cut-off dates. He submits thatState Government can reconsider the objections of the petitioners and similarly placed transportoperators and pass a reasoned order by which exercise no prejudice will be caused to the State or theCorporation.

He would draw the attention of the Court to the notification dated 07.02.2015 whereunder the StateGovernment has authorized the Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat RajDepartment, Government of Karnataka to hear the objections/suggestions and he has not beenempowered to take decision. He would submit that he has been only authorized to hear theobjections and place it with his recommendations to the State Government for the StateGovernment to pass appropriate orders. He would submit that hearing authority has heard the



matter and recommended to the State Government, which in turn, has passed the impugned orderand thereby the authority which heard the matter has not passed the order and relies uponjudgment of Apex Court in the case of RASID JAVED vs STATE OF U.P. reported in (2010)7 SCC781.

He would also contend that though operators had raised several contentions, the hearing authorityin fact had made recommendation to the State Government for either taking the existing buses onlease from the operators as was done earlier or to bring a detailed modification proposal as requiredunder Section 99 in case of services of permit holders are necessary in public interest to be savedand yet the State Government without examining the viability of these recommendations, has by oneline order, dropped further proceedings pursuant to the draft notifications.

He would also submit that pursuant to the draft notifications, permits were granted in favour of theoperators and they have been operating as such and these permits are required to be saved.

He would also contend that the State Government while drafting the scheme had not passed aspeaking order and this mistake which was pointed out by the Division Bench and had returnedback to the Government to pass a reasoned order, had not yielded any positive result and therecommendations made by hearing authority in paragraph 103 of the impugned order is contrary tothe directions issued by the Apex Court. He would also contend that recommendation made by thehearing authority is itself beyond the scope and as such, he prays for quashing of the impugnedorder.

10. It is contended by Sri C.V.Kumar, learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that the StateGovernment alone has to take a decision and at any time, if it considers in the public interest tomodify any approved scheme, the State Government will have to pass an order by modifying thescheme under Section 102 of MV Act. He would submit that the State Government had earliermodified the existing scheme by issuance of notification dated 31.05.2007 with the sole idea ofsaving the permits granted by the Transport Authorities and the permits so granted was neverchallenged or questioned by the STUs and as such, the permit granted in favour of the operatorscannot be termed as illegal. He would contend that only when the decision came to be rendered inASHRAFULLA KHAN's case in the year 2002, the permits granted by the authorities becamevulnerable for attack by the STUs and they started objecting to the renewal of the permits on theground that such permits are illegal. He would submit that an exercise has to be undertaken by theState Government to address the defect pointed out in the earlier proceedings of modification whichwas the reason to set aside the modifications and those defects are persisting or existing even in theorder dated 05.08.2015 and he would draw the attention of the Court to the said order where thehearing authority itself has held that 'saving operators who have got permits before the cut-off datewould discriminate against operators who have got permits after the cut-off dates'.

11. Sri Siddananjaiah, learned Advocate appearing for petitioners would draw the attention of theCourt to the BTS scheme and particularly, clause (1) contending that scheme was approved inrelation to the Bangalore City Corporation and as per clause (d) the exemption is given to theoperators plying in rural areas.



12. Per contra, the learned Advocates appearing for the State and the Corporation led by Sri. AdithyaSondhi, learned Addl. Advocate General and Sri. Ashok Haranahalli, Senior Counsel have contendedthat Rule 5 provides for such delegation and in exercise of such power the State Government hadauthorized the Addl.

Chief Secretary to hear the objections and as such there is no error committed by the respondent inpassing the impugned order. It is also contended that under general power vested under Section107(1) the State Government is empowered to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect ofthis Chapter and by virtue of the same Rules have been introduced and Rule 5 specifically providesfor consideration of objections by three persons namely, (1) the Minister in-charge of transport; and(2) where the Minister in-charge of transport is appointed as Chairman of the Karnataka State RoadTransport Corporation, (3) the Minister in charge of law and parliamentary affairs or the Secretaryto Government, Transport Department authorized by the Minister concerned would be the authorityto hear the objections under Section 100 of the Act.

13. Sri. P.R.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent / Corporation has contended thatpetitioners have been operating their services based on illegal permits, inasmuch as, the Schemesprohibited grant of permits to private operators, yet the authorities granted the permits onmisrepresentation. Though the State Government started regularizing the permits and wasintending to bring about modification in the existing scheme, the last of the modifications had beenchallenged by the Corporation which came to be accepted by the Division Bench and matter wasremitted to the Government so as to pass fresh orders in accordance with law and now by virtue ofthe impugned Government Order the State Government has arrived at a conclusion that there is noneed for modification in the Scheme.

He would elaborate his submission by contending that a right vested to the petitioners is flowingfrom Chapter V of the MV Act which infringes the right of Corporation vested under Chapter VI ofthe MV Act and in such circumstances the right of a private operator has to yield to that of theCorporation or State Transport undertaking. He would also contend that no private operator has aright to compel the Government to either modify or not to modify the Scheme and it is the pleasureof the Government to undertake such exercise. He would draw the attention of the Court to thejudgments of ADARSHA's case - AIR 1986 SC 319 and ASHRAFULLA's case - AIR 2002 SC 629,whereunder at paragraph 13 and 28 the emphasis is laid not on the right of private operators tocontinue to operate their services but on eliminating the inconvenience, as far as possible, to thepassengers.

He would submit that hearing can be effective only if the hearing authority sums up as to what hehas heard, so as to enable the authority passing the order.

He would also submit that Section 102 of the MV Act does not require that while exercising thepower should pass a speaking order.

He contends that parliament has conferred certain privileges on a State Transport undertaking andit should be presumed that Corporation is best suited to meet the situation. He would also draw the



attention of the Court to the additional affidavit of the Corporation filed on 13.06.2016 outlining thecapability to run the buses where private operators are operating and the sufficiency to replace theoperation of the private operators, so as to mitigate the inconvenience to the traveling public andcontends that Act I of 2016 brought about by the State Government enables the private operatorsalso to operate the services for one year though on the basis of temporary permit. On these grounds,he seeks for rejection of the writ petitions and prays for upholding the validity of the impugnedGovernment Order dated 05.08.2015 and the orders passed by the Transport Appellate Tribunal.

14. Sri Ashok Haranahalli, learned Senior Counsel appearing for KSRTC would draw the attention ofthe Court to the original records of the State Government to contend that on the basis of the reportof the hearing authority, the decision is taken by the Cabinet and the acceptance by the Cabinet insingle process of decision making has to be read together. He would contend that it is not a casewhere Cabinet has taken a different decision that of the Secretary, but on the other hand, therecommendation made by hearing authority was accepted by the Cabinet by virtue of ultimatepower vesting with the Cabinet. He would submit that if the State intends to take a decision to dropthe process of modifying the scheme, then there is no need to hear. He would also submit that thereis already an integrated scheme formed under Section 100 and by issuing illegal permits, it wouldfrustrate the scheme itself and the scheme which gives monopoly to the STU over the areas, then theSTUs alone would be entitled to operate. Hence, he contends that the State cannot regularize anunauthorized or illegal permit. He would contend that permits were given to the operators onaccount of interpretation of intersection being given by Hon'ble Apex Court in ASHRAFULLAKHAN's case and if the scheme itself saves certain class of permits, the STUs cannot have objection.He would submit that the State cannot under the guise of modification of the scheme destroy theoriginal scheme itself and save the permits which have been granted contrary to the scheme. As towhether a permit granted is saved under the scheme is an issue which requires to be examined bythe authorities and not through modification of the scheme. He would draw the attention of theCourt to the notification dated 31.05.2007 questioned by KSRTC which has now been sent back tothe State Government to clarify which provided that notwithstanding the fact that there is notifiedarea, if an operator is plying the buses as on 09.03.2007 would be entitled to operate.

Thus, the modification that was provided was that there was complete exclusion in the earlierscheme and yet notwithstanding such exclusion, the operators continue to operate by obtainingpermits and this was sought to be saved under the modification. Hence, the Government wasexamining as to whether there is any need to modify the scheme so as to provide saving the permitswhich have been issued contrary to the scheme.

He would contend that once there is a notified scheme, authorities are prohibited from issuingpermits and contrary to the scheme and yet they went on issuing permits and such illegal permitswas sought to be saved by modifying the scheme and hence, the hearing authority has recommendedto the State Government for dropping the proposal to modify the existing scheme, which does notcall for interference. He would also submit that the STUs have been consistently taking a standbefore all the forums that it is ready with all infrastructure to provide efficient transport services tothe commuting public in respect of the notified schemes and he draws the attention of the Court tothe affidavit of the KSRTC Official filed undertaking thereunder to operate in all areas and the



readiness to purchase additional buses and even otherwise, if the STUs failed to operate on thenotified routes, the Government can step in to modify the scheme. Hence, he contends that there isno need to safeguard the operators and as such, he contends that even in the event of GovernmentOrder dated 05.08.2015 being held as contrary to the scheme of Act, even then, there would be nonecessity to give protection to the operators and it is for the State Government to examine suchclaims on case to case basis. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petitions.

DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS:

15. Facts on hand would indicate that Kolar Scheme, Bellary Scheme, Mysore, Bangalore, BTS andKanakapura Schemes was sought to be modified by notifications dated 07.11.2003, 24.07.2003 and31.05.2007 respectively by the State Government in exercise of the power vested under Section 102of the MV Act on the ground that existing operators who were plying about 1500 buses and carrying1.5 lakh passengers and those permits are required to be saved, as otherwise, grave inconveniencewould be caused to the travelling public. The Corporation filed its objections to the proposedmodification of the schemes contending that it is providing efficient, adequate, economical andproperly coordinated transport services to the commuting passengers. However, by overruling theobjections, final notification came to be issued on 31.05.2007, which was duly published in theGazette on 04.06.2007. On the ground that objections filed by the Corporation, not having beenconsidered by the State Government by following the procedure prescribed under Section 102 of MVAct, the proposed modification of the schemes as per the notification dated 31.05.2007 which hadbeen issued by the State Government came to be questioned before this Court in W.P.No.158/2008and connected matters. The proposal to modify the schemes was defended by the State and so alsothe private operators. The Division Bench by its order dated 21.04.2011 held that first respondentnamely, Minister for Home, Law and Parliamentary Affairs had held the proceedings withouthearing the objections filed by the Corporation and the operators and as such, there has beennon-application of mind to the objections filed by the Corporation. Hence, the impugnednotification dated 31.05.2007 came to be set aside and matter came to be remitted back to the firstrespondent - State Government to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. The operative portion ofthe direction issued by the Division Bench reads as under:

"The matter is remitted to the first respondent - State Government to pass freshorders in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of copy of this order or production of certified copy of this order whichever isearlier, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner -Corporation and other private operators and after considering the objections filed bythem in accordance with law."

By way of succour to existing permit holders or in other words by way of interim arrangement,Division Bench permitted the private operators to operate their vehicles for a period of three monthsfrom the date of order if they were holding permits which are valid as on the said date. WritPetitions which had been filed by the operators against the orders of the Transport AppellateTribunal cancelling the permits granted in their favour also came to be dismissed and as alreadynoticed herein above, they were permitted to operate their vehicles for a period of three months



from the date of order. The liberty so granted by the Division Bench reads as under:

"(c) Writ Petition No.16990/2006 and connected matters are dismissed confirmingthe order passed by the KSTAT. However, the petitioners are permitted to operatetheir vehicles, if they are holding permits which are valid as on today and if they areauthorized to run the vehicles otherwise for a period of three months from today. It ismade clear that no further extension of time will be granted to the private operators."

Likewise, the notifications dated 07.11.2003 and 24.07.2003 issued by the State Governmentmodifying the Kolar and Bellary Schemes respectively, were also set aside by the Division Bench byorder dated 21.04.2011 and the matter came to be remitted back to the first respondent - StateGovernment as had been ordered in W.P.No.158/2008 and connected matters.

16. These orders of the Division Bench came to be challenged by some of the operators in CivilAppeal Nos.11690-11712/2014 and connected matters.

During the pendency of Civil Appeals, interim order of stay came to be granted by the Apex Courtand as such, permits issued to the private operators were renewed from time to time by the StateTransport Authorities.

Hon'ble Apex Court by judgment dated 18.12.2004 dismissed all the Special Leave Petitions andCivil Appeals issued certain directions and for purposes of immediate reference, they are extractedherein below:

"38. It was also submitted on behalf of one of the operators that as some of thepermits granted were illegally cancelled, fixation of the cut off date and validating thepermits held on the cut off dates would be discriminatory as that would createmonopoly in favour of the incumbent private operators who were operating theirvehicles on the cut off date.

39. It was submitted on behalf of KSRTC that it was at the behest of the privateoperators that the exercise of modification had been undertaken by the StateGovernment.

40. We refrain to dilate upon the various aforesaid aspects as these were required tobe considered by the State Government when such objections had been taken beforeit by KSRTC. It was necessary to consider, inter alia, the objections raised by theKSRTC as to the necessity of modification, legality of the permits which were grantedand the plea of discrimination so raised by other operators including the observationmade above by this Court in KSRTC v Ashrafulla Khan (supra).

41. Resultantly, the appeals being bereft of merits are hereby dismissed. Let StateGovernment hear the objections, consider and decide the same in accordance withlaw by a reasoned order within 3 months. In the intervening period, the arrangement



as directed by the High Court in the impugned order to continue."

17. The Hon'ble Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's case while affirming the judgment of the DivisionBench has held that modification of the scheme is a quasi judicial function and while modifying orcancelling the scheme, State Government is duty bound to consider the objections and has to assignreasons either to accept or reject them. It has been further held by the Apex Court that rule of reasonis anti-thesis to arbitrariness in action and is a necessary concomitant of the principles of naturaljustice. On facts it came to be held that there is no consideration of the objections namely, bothfactual and legal objections raised by Corporation have not been considered by the StateGovernment. It has been held by the Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's case referred to supra as follows:

28. "It is apparent that there is no consideration of the objections except mentioningthe arguments of the rival parties. Objections both factual and legal have not beenconsidered much less reasons assigned to over rule them. Even in brief, reasons havenot been assigned indicating how objections are disposed of.

29. Situation is worse in the orders modifying other schemes. Thus, modification ofthe Schemes could not be said to be in accordance with the principles of naturaljustice in the absence of reasons so as to reach the conclusion that private operatorsare meeting the genuine demands of the public in excess of the service provided bythe STOs., hence, it cannot be said to be sustainable."

The Hon'ble Apex Court, as noticed hereinabove, has directed the State Government to reconsiderthe matter by considering the objections raised by KSRTC, legality of the permits granted and theplea of discrimination so raised by other operators.

18. It is in the light of said direction issued by the Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's case, the StateGovernment issued a notification dated 07.02.2015 authorising the Additional Chief Secretary,Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department to hear the objections/suggestions in respect oft h e d r a f t n o t i f i c a t i o n s . A p u b l i c n o t i c e d a t e d 1 9 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 5 ( A n n e x u r e - D i nW.P.Nos.34625-34679/2015) was issued by the "hearing authority" by fixing the hearing date as07.03.2015. Accordingly, the matter was heard by the said hearing authority on 07.03.2015 andafter considering the arguments advanced by all the concerned, following points came to beformulated for its consideration:

(a) necessary of modification of the three approved schemes;

(b) legality of permits which were granted to private operators;

(c) plea of discrimination raised by other operators.

On point No.(a) the hearing authority opined that the necessity for omnibus notification which doesnot have the relevant particulars as required by law, as proposed in the present form, is not



established and such omnibus notification would frustrate and defeat the very purpose ofintroducing the original schemes.

On point No.(b) it came to be held that permits were obtained by the private operators under theshelter of the orders of the High Court and the Apex Court in B.A.LINGAREDDY's case referred tosupra after having noticed the ASHRAFULLA's case referred to supra has held said law laid down isof retrospective operation and as such had concluded all permits issued after the date of the originalnotification on the notified routes which were overlapping the notified routes are not saved bysubsequent final notification and as such, all permits are illegal permits ab initio.

On point No.(c) namely, discrimination, it was held that all permits issued after the date of originaldraft scheme are illegal except those saved under interstate operations by later modifications and assuch, all permits issued after the date of draft/final notification of the original schemes on thenotified routes or overlapping the routes would be uniformly illegal, by following the dicta laid downby Hon'ble Apex court in LINGAREDDY's case.

The hearing authority as such, opined and concluded that a detailed modification proposal asrequired under Section 99 and on the lines of Shivamogga scheme notification, is required to bebrought forward like in the case of permit holders whose services are necessary in public interest areto be saved and on these lines, the hearing authority concluded and made recommendation to theState Government as under:

i) "The necessity for the modification of the approved scheme contained in the draftnotification is not established. As discussed above while there is general agreementthat the approved scheme has to be modified in view of lapse of time, themodification should have specific particulars of the nature of the services proposed tobe rendered, the area or the routes proposed to be covered, the overlapping portionsproposed to be exempted and other relevant particulars respecting thereto asrequired under section 99(1) of the M.V.Act 1988.

ii) All the permits issued on the notified routes or overlapping them after the date of the originaldraft/final notification of the original scheme are illegal.

iii) Firstly there would be discrimination as against applicants who applied for permits but wererejected while others on the same footing were granted if such grantees were saved. The existence ofsuch cases have been referred to during the arguments. Secondly fixing any cut-off date isdiscriminatory against some operators who may have got their permits after the cut-off date. Savingoperators who have got permits before the cut-off date would discriminate against operators whogot permits after the cut-off dates. Therefore, all the three draft notifications are discriminatorybecause they specify certain cut-off dates.

iv) In view of the above, further proceedings on the three draft notification referred to in para 9above may be dropped."



19. As already noticed herein above, the learned Advocates appearing for the petitioners havestrenuously contended that it is the hearing authority alone which ought to have decided and therecannot be any division by the hearing authority and the authority which passes the order, since itwould be contrary to the concept of principles of natural justice. On the contrary, the learned Addl.Advocate General as well as learned Advocates appearing for the Corporation have sought to sustainsuch procedure adopted by contending that petitioners having participated in the proceedingsconducted by the hearing authority and as such, they are now estopped from questioning hisauthority to hear and record; It is further contended that hearing authority had acted within thepowers vested in him by the State Government as empowered under Rule 5 of State TransportUndertaking Rules, 1996 and delegatee has confined his activity to the powers invested to him undernotification dated 7.2.2015 and has accordingly, heard and made the recommendations to the StateGovernment; Rule 5 as amended provides for such delegation, which Rule has been enacted byvirtue of the power vested in the State Government under Section 107 of MV Act.

20. In the light of the above contentions, it would be necessary and appropriate to notice thestatutory provisions governing the power of the State Government for approving or modifying ascheme.

Same can be traced to Chapter-VI of the MV Act, 1988 and the relevant provisions which havebearing on the facts obtained in the instant case are extracted herein below:

"99. Preparation and publication of proposal regarding road transport service of aState transport undertaking.--(1) Where any State Government is of opinion that forthe purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical and properly co-

ordinated road transport service, it is necessary in the public interest that road transport services ingeneral or any particular class of such service in relation to any area or route or portion thereofshould be run and operated by the State transport undertaking, whether to the exclusion, completeor partial, of other persons or otherwise, the State Government may formulate a proposal regardinga scheme giving particulars of the nature of the services proposed to be rendered, the area or routeproposed to be covered and other relevant particulars respecting thereto and shall publish suchproposal in the Official Gazette of the State formulating such proposal and in not less than onenewspaper in the regional language circulating in the area or route proposed to be covered by suchscheme and also in such other manner as the State Government formulating such proposal deem fit.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), when a proposal is published under thatsub-section, then from the date of publication of such proposal, no permit shall be granted to anyperson, except a temporary permit during the pendency of the proposal and such temporary permitshall be valid only for a period of one year from the date of its issue or till the date of finalpublication of the scheme under section 100, whichever is earlier.]

100. Objection to the proposal.-- (1) On the publication of any proposal regarding a scheme in theOfficial Gazette and in not less than one newspaper in the regional language circulating in the areaor route which is to be covered by such proposal any person may, within thirty days from the date of



its publication in the Official Gazette, file objections to it before the State Government.

(2) The State Government may, after considering the objections and after giving an opportunity tothe objector or his representatives and the representatives of the State transport undertaking to beheard in the matter, if they so desire, approve or modify such proposal.

(3) The scheme relating to the proposal as approved or modified under sub- section (2) shall then bepublished in the Official Gazette by the State Government making such scheme and in not less thanone newspaper in the regional language circulating in the area or route covered by such scheme andthe same shall thereupon become final on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette and shallbe called the approved scheme and the area or route to which it relates shall be called the notifiedarea or notified route:

Provided that no such scheme which relates to any inter-State route shall be deemed to be anapproved scheme unless it has the previous approval of the Central Government.

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where a scheme is not published as anapproved scheme under sub-section (3) in the Official Gazette within a period of one year from thedate of publication of the proposal regarding the scheme in the Official Gazette under sub-section(1), the proposal shall be deemed to have lapsed.

Explanation.--In computing the period of one year referred to in this sub-section, any period orperiods during which the publication of the approved scheme under sub-section (3) was held up onaccount of any stay or injunction by the order of any Court shall be excluded.

101. Operation of additional services by a State transport undertaking in certain circumstances.--Notwithstanding anything contained in section 87, a State transport undertaking may, in the publicinterest operate additional services for the conveyance of the passengers on special occasions suchas to and from fairs and religious gatherings:

Provided that the State transport undertaking shall inform about the operation of such additionalservices to the concerned Transport Authority without delay.

102. Cancellation or modification of scheme.-- (1) The State Government may, at any time, if itconsiders necessary, in the public interest so to do, modify any approved scheme after giving--

(i) the State transport undertaking; and

(ii) any other person who, in the opinion of the State Government, is likely to beaffected by the proposed modification, an opportunity of being heard in respect of theproposed modification.

(2) The State Government shall publish any modification proposed under sub- section (1) in theOfficial Gazette and in one of the newspapers in the regional languages circulating in the area in



which it is proposed to be covered by such modification, together with the date, not being less thanthirty days from such publication in the Official Gazette, and the time and place at which anyrepresentation received in this behalf will be heard by the State Government.

103. Issue of permits to State transport undertakings.-- (1) Where, in pursuance of an approvedscheme, any State transport undertaking applies in such manner as may be prescribed by the StateGovernment in this behalf for a stage carriage permit or a goods carriage permit or a contractcarriage permit in respect of a notified area or notified route, the State Transport Authority in anycase where the said area or route lies in more than one region and the Regional Transport Authorityin any other case shall issue such permit to the State transport undertaking, notwithstandinganything to the contrary contained in Chapter V.

(2) For the purpose of giving effect to the approved scheme in respect of a notified area or notifiedroute, the State Transport Authority or, as the case may be, the Regional Transport Authorityconcerned may, by order,--

(a) refuse to entertain any application for the grant or renewal of any other permit orreject any such application as may be pending;

(b) cancel any existing permit;

(c) modify the terms of any existing permit so as to--

(i) render the permit ineffective beyond a specified date;

(ii) reduce the number of vehicles authorised to be used under the permit;

(iii) curtail the area or route covered by the permit in so far as such permit relates tothe notified area or notified route.

(3) For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no appeal shall lie againstany action taken, or order passed, by the State Transport Authority or any RegionalTransport Authority under sub-section (1) or sub-

section (2)."

"107. Power of State Government to make rules:-

(1) The State Government may make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect theprovisions of this Chapter.

(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, suchrules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely ----



(a) the form in which any proposal regarding a scheme may be published undersection 99;

(b) the manner in which objections may be filed under sub-

section (1) of section 100;

(c) the manner in which objections may be considered and disposed of undersub-section (2) of section 100;"

Section 99 of the MV Act empowers the State Government to formulate a proposalregarding a scheme for the purposes of providing an efficient, adequate, economicaland properly coordinated road transport service, in relation to any area or route orportion thereof to be run and operated by the State Transport Undertaking either tothe complete or partial exclusion of other persons or otherwise, by giving particularsof the nature of the services to be rendered, area or route proposed to be covered andother relevant particulars thereto by publishing in the Official Gazette and also in notless than one newspaper in the regional language circulating in the area and in suchother manner the State Government deems fit. On publication of such proposal, nopermit can be granted to any person except a temporary permit during the pendencyof the proposal which would be valid for a period of one year from the date of its issueor till the date of final publication of the scheme under Section 100 whichever isearlier. On publication of any proposal regarding a scheme in the Official Gazette andin not less than one newspaper in the regional language circulating in the area can beobjected to by any person by filing objections before the State Government to suchproposal within 30 days from the date of its publication under Section 100(1). TheState Government after considering the objections and after giving an opportunity ofhearing to the objector or his representative, approve or modify such proposal underSection 100(2). Sub-section (3) of Section 100 provides for publication of theapproved or modified scheme in the Official Gazette and as per proviso, a schemewhich relates to interstate route will have to receive the previous approval of theCentral Government. After calling for objections to the proposed scheme, andexamining the same, the scheme has to be published in accordance with theprovisions of Section 100 of the Act. The scheme once published is law and itoperates against everyone unless it is modified or cancelled by the State Government.The power to cancel or modify the scheme rests with the State Government underSection 102 of the Act. If a scheme is not published as an approved scheme undersub-section (3) in the Official Gazette, within a period of one year from the date ofpublication of the proposal regarding the scheme in the Official Gazette undersub-section (1), the proposal is deemed to have lapsed as per sub-section (4) ofSection 100. Section 101 empowers the State Transport Undertaking to operateadditional services for the conveyance of the passengers on special occasions, such as



to and from fairs and religious gatherings, notwithstanding anything contained inSection 87.

However, the State Transport Undertaking is required to inform the concerned Transport Authorityabout such operation of additional services without any delay.

Section 102 of the Act enables or empower the State Government at any time to modify anyapproved scheme after giving the State Transport Undertaking and any other person who in theopinion of the State Government is likely to be affected by the proposed modification an opportunityof being heard in respect of the proposed modification. Thus, scheme of Section 102 would indicatethat State Government is vested with power to cancel the scheme or modify the scheme.

Section 107 of the Act empowers the State Government to make rules for the purposes of carryinginto effect the provisions of the Act. A bare reading of sub-section (2) of Section 107 would indicateabout such rules which would provide for the matters indicated in sub-clause

(a) to (h).

In these writ petitions clause (a) to (c) has been pressed into service by the learned Advocatesappearing for the parties in support of their respective contentions which is already extracted herein above.

21. In the background of the statutory provisions as noticed herein above and in the light ofdirection issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's case while affirming the order passedby the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.158/2008 and other connected matters on 21.04.2011it has to be examined as to whether there is compliance of directions issued by Apex Court and thestatutory provisions of MV Act governing the issue have been followed by the State Government inits letter and spirit.

22. The main ground of attack to the impugned order dated 05.08.2015 by the learned Advocatesappearing for the petitioners is Section 102 of the MV Act enables the State Government at any timeto modify any approved scheme and such power of modifying is to be exercised by the StateGovernment itself and not by a delegatee. It is also contended that State Government has takenrecourse to appoint its delegatee to hear the objections and a notification dated 07.02.2015 had beenpublished authorizing Sri. Vijaya Bhaskar, Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development andPanchayat Raj Department as the hearing authority by taking recourse to Rule 5 of Karnataka StateTransport Undertaking Rules, 1996, and said Rule runs contrary to Section 107 of the Act and thepower of the State Government to amend or modify an existing Scheme cannot be delegated andthere is no power to make rules to delegate the power under Section 102 of the Act. It is alsocontended that Section 107 has authorized the State Government to make rules in respect ofprocedure to be followed by formulating a new scheme under Section 99 and 100 of the Act but itcannot be applied to the modification of the existing scheme. It has also been contended that Section107 authorises the State Government to make rules regarding procedure to be followed whileexercising the power under Section 99 and 100 of the Act and not under Section 102 of the Act.



Hence, it is contended that the Rule 5 of the Karnataka State Transport Undertaking Rules, 1996 isunconstitutional, null and void.

23. Per contra, learned Additional Advocate General and learned Advocates appearing on behalf ofthe Corporation defended the proceedings of the hearing authority by contending that Rule 5 of1996 Rules provides for delegatee to hear the objections, which Rule has been made by virtue ofpower vested under Section107(1) of the MV Act and as such, it is contended that Rule 5 isintra-vires of the Act.

24. In the light of said rival contentions raised, it would be appropriate to extract Rule 5 of theKarnataka State Transport Undertaking Rules, 1996 as amended and it reads as under:

"5. Consideration of objections--

(1) The Minister in-charge of Transport or where the Minister in- charge of Transportis appointed as Chairman of any one or more Karnataka State Road TransportCorporation:-

(a) any Minister from the Council of Ministers; or

(b) the Additional Chief Secretary to Government; or

(c) the Principal Secretary to Government or Secretary to Government of anySecretariat Department.

authorized by the Minister in-charge of Transport shall be the authority to hear anddecide the objections under Section 100.

(2) The date, time and place of hearing shall be published at least two weeks beforethe date of hearing, in the Official Gazette and also in a Kannada daily newspaperhaving wide circulation in the area or route proposed to be covered by the proposaland such publication shall be sufficient notice to the parties."

25. Section 100, 102 and 107 when read harmoniously, would indicate that under Sub-section (1) ofSection 107 the State Government is empowered to make rules for the purposes of carrying intoeffect the provisions of Chapter VI. Sub-section (2) of Section 107 enables the State Government tomake such rules which may provide for all or any of the matters as specified in clause (a) to (h), inparticular and without prejudice to the foregoing power. Clause (a) of sub-

section (2) of Section 107 enables the State Government to formulate the rules regarding the form inwhich any proposal regarding a scheme may be published under Section 99; and clause (b) providesfor making Rules with regard to the manner in which objections can be filed under Sub-section (1) ofSection 100 and clause (c) provides for the State Government to make Rules relating to the mannerin which objections can be considered and disposed of under sub-section(2) of Section 100; and



lastly, clause (d) provides for the State Government to make Rules as to the form in which anyapproved scheme may be published under sub-section (3) of Section 100.

26. When the above referred provisions are read in conjunction with Rule 5 (1), it would clearlyindicate that the persons authorized thereunder would be empowered to hear and decide theobjections under Section 100. Section 102 which enables the State Government at any time if itconsiders necessary in the public interest to modify any approved scheme is specifically excludedfrom the purview of Section 107 and Rule 5. If the intention of the Rule making authority was toempower the persons indicated under Rule 5 to hear the objections or opportunity of hearing is tobe extended as contemplated under Section 102 , then the State Government would haveempowered said authority to hear and decide the objections by specifically indicating as such insub-rule (1) of Rule 5 and in the absence thereof, the State Government cannot be heard to contendthat by virtue of Section 107 (1) of the Act read with Rule 5, it had authorized Sri. Vijaya Bhaskar,Additional Chief Secretary to hear the objections received under Section 102 of the Act and thispower exercised by the State Government is without authority of law.

27. A plain reading of Section 107 of the Act would clearly indicate that the Parliament haveexcluded the power of the State Government to provide for making rule insofar as Section 102 of theAct is concerned and sub-section (2) of Section 107 provides for the State Government having powerto make Rules in respect of the matters indicated under clause (a) to

(h) of sub-section (2) of Section 107. A close look at Section 102 of the Act would make it manifestlyclear that modification of the approved scheme may be done by the State Government in the publicinterest after giving opportunity of being heard in respect of proposed modification to the STU andany other person likely to be affected by the proposed modification. The modification proposed isrequired to be published in the Official Gazette and in one of the newspapers in the regionallanguages circulating in the concerned area as indicated in Section 102(2).

28. Petitioners have contended that hearing authority had not been authorized to decide the caseand he was only authorized to hear the objections and not to decide or recommend, since thespecific direction issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's case was to the Governmentto decide the objections;

hearing authority had no power to decide or to give final decision in the matter and a quasi judicialact when discharged by the Government it has to extend personal hearing to the objectors instead ofentrusting the duty to a delegatee. Hon'ble Apex Court in case of GULLAPALLI NAGESHWARARAO's1 case was examining the provisions of Section 68-C and 68-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939which is similar and in paramateria to Section 99 and 100 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and onexamination as to whether the act of approving or rejecting the objections to a scheme proposed bythe Government would fall within the province of "quasi judicial act" , has held that StateGovernment order under Section 68-D is a judicial act 1 AIR 1959 SC 308 and it has been held bythe Apex Court to the following effect:



"21. The aforesaid three decisions lay down that whether an administrative tribunalhas a duty to act judicially should be gathered form the provisions of the particularstatute and the rules made thereunder, and they clearly express the view that if anauthority is called upon to decide respective rights of contesting parties or, to put it inother words, if there is a lis, ordinarily there will be a duty on the part of the saidauthority to act judicially. Applying the aforesaid test, let us scrutinize the provisionsof Ss. 68-C and 68-D and the relevant rules made under the Act to ascertain whetherunder the said provisions the State Government performs a judicial act or anadministrative one. Section 68-C may be divided into three parts: (i) The StateTransport Undertaking should come to an opinion that it is necessary in publicinterest that the road transport service in general or any particular class of suchservice in relation to any area or route or portion thereof should be run or operatedby the State Transport Undertaking, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, ofother persons or otherwise;

(ii) it forms that opinion for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical andproperly co-ordinated road transport service; and (iii) after it comes to that opinion, it prepares ascheme giving particulars of the nature of the services proposed to be rendered, area or routeproposed to be covered and such other particulars respecting thereto as may be prescribed andcauses it to be published in the Official Gazette. The section, therefore makes a clear distinctionbetween the purpose for which a scheme is framed and the particulars of the scheme. To state itdifferently, though the purpose is to provide an efficient, adequate, economical and co-ordinatedroad transport service in public interest, the scheme proposed may affect individual rights such asthe exclusion, complete or partial, of other persons or otherwise, from the business in any particularroute or routes. Under S. 68-C, therefore, the State Transport Undertaking may propose a schemeaffecting the proprietary rights of individual permit-holders doing transport business in a particularroute or routes. The said proposal threatens the proprietary right of that individual or individuals.Under S. 68-D read with Rules 8 and 10 made under the Act, any person affected by the aforesaidproposed scheme may file objections within the prescribed time before the Secretary of theTransport Department. Under the said provisions, the State Government is enjoined to approve ormodify the scheme after holding an enquiry and after giving an opportunity to the objectors or theirrepresentatives and the representatives of the State Transport Undertaking, to be heard in thematter in person or through authorized representatives. Therefore, the proceeding prescribed isclosely approximated to that obtaining in courts of justice. There are two parties to the dispute. TheState Transport Undertaking, which is a statutory authority under the Act, threatens to infringe therights of a citizen. The citizen may object to the scheme on public grounds or on personal grounds.He may oppose the scheme on the ground that it is not in the interest of the public or on the groundthat the route which he is exploiting should be excluded from the scheme for various reasons. Thereis, therefore, a proposal and an opposition and the third party, the State Government is to decidethat lis and prima facie it must do so judicially. The position is put beyond any doubt by theprovision in the Act and the Rules which expressly require that the State Government must decidethe dispute according to the procedure prescribed by the Act and the Rules framed thereunder viz.,after considering the objections and after hearing both the parties. It therefore appears to us thatthis is an obvious case where the Act imposes a duty on the State Government to decide the act



judicially in approving or modifying the scheme proposed by the Transport Undertaking."

29. As could be seen from the impugned order, the hearing authority who was empowered to receivethe objections and hear them as per the notice of enquiry dated 19.02.2015 has not merely heard thelearned Advocates and the parties appearing before him but has also adjudicated by formulating hispoints for consideration as could be seen from paragraph 181 of his order and it reads as under:

"181. In the light of the above direction, the following points arise for consideration:

a) Necessity of modification of the 3 approved schemes.

b) Legality of permits which were granted to private operators.

c) Plea of discrimination raised by other operators.

After adjudicating the points, the hearing authority has also concluded andrecommended as per the recommendations indicated in paragraph 203 and it readsas under:

"203. After considering the above arguments and discussions, the hearing authorityconcluded and recommended that:

v) The necessity for the modification of the

approved scheme contained in the draft notification is not established. As discussedabove while there is general agreement that the approved scheme has to be modifiedin view of lapse of time, the modification should have specific particulars of thenature of the services proposed to be rendered, the area or the routes proposed to becovered, the overlapping portions proposed to be exempted and other relevantparticulars respecting thereto as required under section 99(1) of the M.V.Act 1988.

vi) All the permits issued on the notified routes or overlapping them after the date ofthe original draft/final notification of the original scheme are illegal.

vii) Firstly there would be discrimination as against applicants who applied forpermits but were rejected while others on the same footing were granted if suchgrantees were saved. The existence of such cases have been referred to during thearguments.

Secondly fixing any cut-off date is discriminatory against some operators who mayhave got their permits after the cut-off date.

Saving operators who have got permits before the cut-



off date would discriminate against operators who got permits after the cut-off dates.Therefore, all the three draft notifications are discriminatory because they specifycertain cut-off dates.

viii) In view of the above, further proceedings on the three draft notification referred to in para 9above may be dropped."

(emphasis supplied by me)

30. The State Government which is required to act judicially as prescribed under Section 102 byapplying its mind after examining the contentions of the parties and discussing the necessity ofeither accepting the proposed modification of the scheme or dropping of the schemes will have to begathered from the impugned order itself so as to arrive at a conclusion there is semblance ofapplication of mind on the part of the Government. In the instant case, the State Government hasblindly accepted the proceedings of the hearing authority or in other words, it has accepted therecommendation of hearing authority by two line order and in the impugned order it has beenordered by Government as under:

"After examination of the proceedings of the Hearing Authority the Governmentissues the following orders:"

and in the operative portion, it has stated that "In the light of the facts and circumstances explainedin the preamble, further proceedings on the TMA 97 (P), dated 25.10.2002, No. HTD/75/TMA/2001dated 27.05.2003 and No.TRD 280 TME 2004, dated 09.03.2007 are hereby dropped."

31. The original records which has been made available by the learned Additional Advocate Generalhas been perused by me and it would indicate that on Civil Appeal Nos.11690-11712/2014(B.A.LINGAREDDY's case) and connected matters came to be dismissed by Apex Court on18.12.2014 affirming the orders of the Division Bench dated 21.04.2001, the file has been put up tothe Hon'ble Transport Minister on 04.02.2015 by the Deputy Secretary and it would indicate thatsaid authority has opined that Rule 5(1) provides for the authorities to hear and decide theobjections under Section 102 of the M.V.Act, 1988 and accordingly the file has been put up fororders to be passed by the Transport Minister. Said note reads as under:

"Hence, the file may be submitted to the Hon'ble Transport Minister for appointingany of the above authorities to hear and decide the objections under Section 102 ofIndian Motor Vehicles Act 1988.

Sd/- 4/2/15 (N.Srinivasa Murthy) Deputy Secretary Pursuant to the above, the file has been put upto the Additional Chief Secretary, Transport who in turn made a note to the following effect:

"For orders on appointing any authority in 116 'A' to hear the objections and passorders."



Sd/- 4/2 ACS Transport Pursuant to the above note, Transport Minister hasappointed Sri Vijaya Bhaskar, ACS, RDPR as hearing authority. It is thereafternotification dated 07.02.2015

- Annexure-G came to be issued. Pursuant to the same, the hearing authority issued anotice dated 19.02.2015 - Annexure-D fixing the date of hearing as 07.03.2015 andafter having heard the matter, has forwarded his report on 17.03.2015 along with theconclusions arrived and recommendations made.

32. Thus, it can be seen from the aforestated facts that while entrusting the matter for hearing, theState Government was not only of the view that "hearing authority" should hear the objections butwas also of the view that said hearing authority should decide the objections under Section 102 ofthe Act. It is the above referred Note-116 which swayed in the mind of the Transport Minister toappoint Sri Vijaya Bhaskar, ACS, RDPR not only for purposes of hearing the objections but alsoauthorizing the hearing authority to decide the matter. As such, the hearing authority after hearingall the concerned has not only addressed the issues or points raised during the course of thearguments by the respective parties, but has also adjudicated the same by concluding his hearingand assigning the reasons as to why three draft notifications cannot be sustained. To worsen thesituation, the hearing authority has recommended for further proceedings on the three draftnotifications being dropped.

33. The said recommendation or the alleged proceedings of the hearing cannot be sustained forreasons more than one. Firstly, the hearing authority was only vested with the power to hear theobjections and not decide the objections. As could be seen from the proceedings, the hearingauthority after having heard the objections of the parties, has recorded a finding with clear cut viewas to why the objections to the dropping of the proceedings pursuant to the notification is requiredto be rejected. In other words, the hearing authority has stepped into the shoes of the decidingauthority namely, the State Government and thereby usurped the power of the State Government orthe deciding authority. It is the State Government alone which had to decide of either proceedingfurther with the three draft notifications or whether they are required to be dropped. The hearingauthority had no role in this exercise which the State Government alone had to undertake. Thus, ithas to be necessarily concluded that hearing authority has exceeded his jurisdiction vested in himunder the notification dated 07.02.2015 - Annexure-G. Secondly, the hearing authority has reliedupon the judgment of this Court rendered in W.P.No.6507/2008 to arrive at a conclusion thatpermits that were not validly original or were illegal and contrary to the statutory provisions cannotbe saved by modification, though said decision has been set aside by the Division Bench of thisCourt on 08.06.2011 in W.A.No.1408/2011 whereunder it came to be held that examination of therival claims of the parties on merits was beyond the scope of writ petition and same was notwarranted in law and as such had set aside the finding of learned Single Judge.

This would also indicate that hearing authority has proceeded at tangent or in other words, hastaken into consideration an over-ruled judgment to form an opinion.



34. Rule 5 which has been very heavily relied upon by the State Government as well as by theCorporation to contend that said Rule empowers the State Government to appoint the hearingauthority, when perused, would disclose that the power which is available to the State under theamended rule empowers the Minister incharge of Transport or where the Minister incharge ofTransport is appointed as Chairman of anyone or more State Road Transport Corporation toauthorize either any Minister from the Council of Ministers or the Additional Chief Secretary toGovernment or the Principal Secretary to Government or Secretary to Government of anySecretariat Department to hear and decide the objections filed under Section 100. There is nowhisper with regard to Section 102 found in Rule 5.

To put it differently, there is no power to the Minister incharge of Transport to authorize the personsor authorities indicated in clause (a) to (c) of sub-rule (1) to hear and decide objections receivedunder Section 102 which relates to the cancellation or modification of a scheme.

35. For the reasons aforestated, it has to be necessarily held that the impugned order is contrary toSection 102 and Rule 5 of 1996 Rules.

36. The direction issued by the Apex Court in LINGAREDDY's2 case would clearly indicate therewas no consideration of the objections and even reasons in brief had not been assigned formodifying the scheme.

It was observed by the Apex Court as under:

"28. It is apparent that there is no consideration of the objections except mentioningthe arguments of the rival parties. Objections both factual and legal have not beenconsidered much less reasons assigned to overrule them. Even in brief, reasons havenot been assigned indicating how objections are disposed of.

29. Situation is worse in the orders modifying other schemes. Thus, modification ofthe Schemes could not be said to be in accordance with the principles of naturaljustice in the absence of reasons so as to reach the conclusion that private operatorsare meeting the genuine demands of the public in excess of the service provided bythe STOs., hence, it cannot be said to be sustainable."

In conclusion it came to be held by the Apex Court as under:

2 AIR 2015 SC 767 "41. Resultantly, xxxx dismissed. Let State Government hear the objections,consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned order within 3 months. In thexxxx to continue."

(emphasis supplied)

37. Thus, a positive direction had been issued to the "State Government" to consider the objectionsnamely, objections raised by Corporation as to necessity of modification, legality of the permits



which were granted to stage carriages and the plea of discrimination so raised by other operators.Thus, the word 'consider' acquires significance. It means, 'to view attentively, to survey, examine,inspect(arch), to look attentively, to contemplate mentally, to think over, mediate on, give heat to,take note off, to think deliberately, bethink oneself, to reflect' vide (shorter Oxford Dictionary).According to the words and phrases, - permanent edition Volume 8-A "to consider"

means to think with care. It is also mentioned therein that to 'consider' means to fix the mind uponwith a view to careful examination; to ponder; study; mediate upon; think or reflect with care. It istherefore, manifest that careful thinking or due application of the mind regarding examination ofthe objections filed by all the parties its examination by the State Government is sine qua non forpassing the order to drop three proposed notifications. If there has been examination of theobjections in said fashion and application of mind to the same, the order impugned would stand thetest as otherwise, it would fail.

38. Now coming back to core issue as to whether the hearing of the objection by the StateGovernment on the principle "He who hears, must decide" requires to be examined by this Courtand the authoritative pronouncement of the Apex Court in the case of GULLAPALLI NAGESWARARAO & OTHERS vs ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ANDANOTHER reported in AIR 1959 SC 308. Hon'ble Apex Court in said case was examining theconstitutional validity of amending Act namely, Act 100 of 1956 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939whereunder Chapter IV-A was inserted which provided for the State Transport undertaking runningthe business to the exclusion, complete or partial, of all other persons doing business in the State. Inexercise of the power conferred by Section 68-C of the amending Act, State Transport undertakingof Andhra Pradesh Road Transport published a scheme for the purpose of providing transportservice in the State of Andhra Pradesh and objections were invited and on receipt of the sameindividual notices came to be issued to the objectors and after affording opportunity to theobjectors, their representatives, and the representative of the STU's, the State Government foundthat the objections to the scheme were devoid of substance. On that finding, the State Governmentapproved the scheme. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the background of the relevant Rules noticed thatthe procedure prescribed under the Rules was followed and the Secretary to Government in-chargeof Transport Department who had heard the objections, prepared the notes, had placed the entirematter, with his notes before the Chief Minister, who in-turn had passed orders rejecting theobjections and approved the scheme. In this background, it was held that divided responsibility isdestructive of the concept judicial hearing and such a procedure defeats the object of personalhearing and if one person hears and another decides, then personal hearing becomes an emptyformality since the act of hearing was a quasi judicial act. It is held:

"18. On the aforesaid xxx to its secretary. Secondly, it is stated that a judicial hearingimplies that the same person hears and gives the decision. But in this case thehearing is given by the Secretary and the decision by the Chief Minister. Thirdly, xxxproposed scheme.

19. At the outset, it would be convenient to consider the question whether the State Government actsquasi- judicially in discharging its functions under S.68-C of the Act. The criteria to ascertain



whether a particular act is a judicial act or an administrative one, have been laid down with clarityby Lord Justice Atkin in Rex v. Electricity Commissioners; Exparte London Electricity JointCommittee Co., xxx (A.I.R.1950 SC 222). They laid down the following conditions: (a) the body ofpersons must have legal authority; (b) the authority should be given to determine questionsaffecting the rights of subjects and (c) they should have a duty to act judicially. In the last of thecases cited supra, Das J., as he then was, analysed the scope of the third condition thus at page 725(of S C R): (at p. 260 of A I R):

(i) xxx (j) that if a statutory

authority has power to do any act which will prejudicially affect the subject, then, although there arenot two parties apart from the authority proposing to do the act and the subject opposing it, the finaldetermination of the authority will yet be a quasi-judicial act provided the authority is required bythe statute to act judicially."

21. The aforesaid three decisions lay down that whether an administrative tribunal has a duty to actjudicially should be gathered form the provisions of the particular statute and the rules madethereunder, and they clearly express the view that if an authority is called upon to decide respectiverights of contesting parties or, to put it in other words, if there is a lis, ordinarily there will be a dutyon the part of the said authority to act judicially. Applying the aforesaid test, let us scrutinize theprovisions of Ss. 68-C and 68-D and the relevant rules made under the Act to ascertain whetherunder the said provisions the State Government performs a judicial act or an administrative one.Section 68-C may be divided into three parts: (i) The State Transport Undertaking should come toan opinion that it is necessary in public interest that the road transport service in general or anyparticular class of such service in relation to any area or route or portion thereof should be run oroperated by the State Transport Undertaking, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of otherpersons or otherwise; (ii) it forms that opinion for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate,economical and properly co-ordinated road transport service; and (iii) after it comes to that opinion,it prepares a scheme giving particulars of the nature of the services proposed to be rendered, area orroute proposed to be covered and such other particulars respecting thereto as may be prescribed andcauses it to be published in the Official Gazette. The section, therefore makes a clear distinctionbetween the purpose for which a scheme is framed and the particulars of the scheme. To state itdifferently, though the purpose is to provide an efficient, adequate, economical and co-ordinatedroad transport service in public interest, the scheme proposed may affect individual rights such asthe exclusion, complete or partial, of other persons or otherwise, from the business in any particularroute or routes. Under S. 68-C, therefore, the State Transport Undertaking may propose a schemeaffecting the proprietary rights of individual permit-holders doing transport business in a particularroute or routes. The said proposal threatens the proprietary right of that individual or individuals.Under S. 68-D read with Rules 8 and 10 made under the Act, any person affected by the aforesaidproposed scheme may file objections within the prescribed time before the Secretary of theTransport Department. Under the said provisions, the State Government is enjoined to approve ormodify the scheme after holding an enquiry and after giving an opportunity to the objectors or theirrepresentatives and the representatives of the State Transport Undertaking, to be heard in thematter in person or through authorized representatives. Therefore, the proceeding prescribed is



closely approximated to that obtaining in courts of justice. There are two parties to the dispute. TheState Transport Undertaking, which is a statutory authority under the Act, threatens to infringe therights of a citizen. The citizen may object to the scheme on public grounds or on personal grounds.He may oppose the scheme on the ground that it is not in the interest of the public or on the groundthat the route which he is exploiting should be excluded from the scheme for various reasons. Thereis, therefore, a proposal and an opposition and the third party, the State Government is to decidethat lis and prima facie it must do so judicially. The position is put beyond any doubt by theprovision in the Act and the Rules which expressly require that the State Government must decidethe dispute according to the procedure prescribed by the Act and the Rules framed thereunder viz.,after considering the objections and after hearing both the parties. It therefore appears to us thatthis is an obvious case where the Act imposes a duty on the State Government to decide the actjudicially in approving or modifying the scheme proposed by the Transport Undertaking.

"24. A comparison of the procedural steps under both the Acts brings out in bold relief the nature ofthe enquiries contemplated under the two statutes. There, there is no lis, no personal hearing andeven the public enquiry contemplated by a third party is presumably confined to the question ofstatutory requirements, or at any rate was for eliciting further information for the Minister. Here,there is a clear dispute between the two parties. The dispute comprehends not only objections raisedon public grounds, but also in vindication of private rights and-it is required to be decided by theState Government after giving a personal hearing and following the rules of judicial procedure.Though there may be some justification for holding, on the facts of the case before the House ofLords that that Act did not contemplate a judicial act-on that question we do not propose to expressour opinion-there is absolutely none for holding in the present case that the Government is notperforming a judicial act. Robson in 'Justice and Administrative Law', commenting upon theaforesaid decision, makes the following observation at page 533:

"It should have been obvious from a cursory glance at the New Towns Act that therules of natural justice could not apply to the Minister's action in making an order,for the simple reason that the initiative lies wholly with him. His role is not toconsider whether an order made by a local authority should be confirmed, nor doeshe have to determine a controversy between a public authority and private interests.The responsibility of seeing that the intention of Parliament is carried out is placedon him."

The aforesaid observations explain the principle underlying that decision and that principle cannothave any application to the facts of this case. In 'Principles of Administrative Law' by Griffith andStreet, the following comment is found on the aforesaid decision : After considering the provisionsof S. 1 of the New Towns Act, 1946, the authors say-

"Like the town-planning legislation, this differs from the Housing Acts in that theMinister is a party throughout. Further, the Minister is not statutorily required toconsider the objections. It is obvious, as the statute itself states, that the creation ofnew towns is of national interest."



At page 176, the authors proceed to state:

Lord Thankerton did not analyse the meanings of "judicial" and "administrative"nor did he specify the particular factors which motivated his classification. It ispermissible to conclude that he looked at the Act as a whole, applying a theory ofinterpretation similar to the rule in Heydon's Case 1584.3 Co Rep. 7a, 7b)."

At page 178, they conclude thus:

"It is submitted, however, that the thoroughness with which the Courts analysed thestatutes in the Errington v. Minister of Health (1935-1 K B 249); Robinson V.Minister of Town and Country Planning, 1947-1 All E R 851; B.Johnsons and Co(Builders) Ltd v. Minister of Health (1947-2 All E R 395); Franklin Case, 1948 A C 87and the emphasis which they have placed on the fact that their decisions have beenbased solely on the statute under consideration makes such an approach inevitable."

It is therefore clear that Franklin's Case 1948 A C 87 is based upon the interpretation of theprovisions of that Act and particularly on the ground that the object of the enquiry is to furtherinform the mind of the Minister and not to consider any issue between the Minister and theobjectors. The decision in that case is not of any help to decide the present case, which turns uponthe construction of the provisions of the Act. For the aforesaid reasons, we hold that the StateGovernment's order under Section 68-D is a judicial act."

39. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of RASID JAVED AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF UTTARPRADESH AND ANOTHER reported in (2010) 7 SCC 781 - was examining the order of the StateGovernment modifying the approved scheme under Section 102(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,and the scope of the hearing authority on behalf of the State Government to be construed as adelegatee and confining his activity within four corners of the powers vested to him or whether hehas acted beyond the power given to him. It came to be held that a distinction must be maintainedwhere the hearing authority is empowered by the State Government to hear objections and approvethe proposed modification or modify the approved scheme and a case where the hearing authority isauthorized to hear the objections / representations relating to the proposed modification to theapproved scheme and it is limited to hearing only. It was held by the Apex Court to the followingeffect:

"48. A close look at Section 102 would make it manifestly clear that modification ofthe approved scheme may be done by the State Government in the public interestafter giving opportunity of being heard in respect of proposed modification to theSTU and the persons likely to be affected by the proposed modification. Themodification proposed is required to be published in the Official Gazette and in oneof the newspapers in the regional languages circulating in the concerned area underSection 102(2).



49. On behalf of the appellants, it was contended that in the proposed modificationpublished in the Official Gazette on 16-4-1999, the authority to hear theobjections/representations was given to Shri Zamiruddin, Special Secretary andAdditional Legal Remembrancer and the said Hearing Authority after hearing theobjections of the affected persons and the UPSRTC approved the proposedmodification and rejected the objections received in this regard and the approval bythe Hearing Authority of the proposed modification by his order dated 11-10-1999 isthe approval of the State Government.

50. Is the order dated 11-10-1999 of the Hearing Authority approving the proposed modificationpublished in the Official Gazette dated 16-4-1999, an order of the State Government modifying theapproved Scheme of 1993 under Section 102(1) of the 1988 Act? The answer has to be in thenegative because Shri Zamiruddin was given authority to hear the representations received by theState Government to the proposed modification but no authority was given to him to approve theproposed modification or modify the approved scheme. The Notification dated 16-4-1999 does notempower the Hearing Authority to approve or modify the scheme; he has only been empowered tohear the objections.

51. That a person who hears must decide and that divided responsibility is destructive of the conceptof judicial hearing is too fundamental a proposition to be doubted. This settled principle has alsobeen highlighted by this Court in Gullapalli Nageswara Rao but based on such principle the limitedauthority of hearing given to the Hearing Authority by the State Government cannot be treated asenlarged in its scope. A delegatee must confine his activity within four corners of the powersinvested in him and if he has acted beyond that, his action cannot have any legal sanction unlessratified by the delegator."

40. As could be seen from RASID JAVED's case, the delegatee namely, the hearing authority notonly received the objections and heard the matter but also passed an order approving the notifiedproposed modification by rejecting the objections of UPSRTC and other objectors. In thisbackground, it was held by the Apex Court that a delegatee must confine his activity within fourcorners of the powers vested in him and if he has acted beyond that, his action cannot have any legalsanction unless ratified by the delegator. As to whether the power could have been delegated by theState Government or not was not an issue in RASID JAVED's case before Apex Court. In the instantcase, facts obtained would disclose that on rejection of Civil Appeals in LINGAREDDY's case by theApex Court and confirming the order of the Division Bench dated 21.04.2011, the State Governmentissued notification on 07.02.2015 (Annexure-G in W.P.No.34265-

79/2015), obviously in exercise of its power under Rule 5 of the Karnataka State TransportUndertaking Rules, 1996 framed by virtue of power vested under Section 107 (1) of MV Act, 1988whereunder the State had authorised Sri Vijaya Bhaskar, Additional Chief Secretary, RuralDevelopment and Panchayat Raj Department as the 'hearing authority'. As already noticed hereinabove, Section 102 does not empower the State Government to delegate its power while consideringobjections to amend or modify an existing scheme. There is no power available to State Governmentto make rules to delegate its power exercisable under Section 102 of the Act. Section 107(2) of the



Act authorises the State Government to make rules in respect of procedure to be followed whileformulating new schemes as per Section 99 and 100 of the Act only. Even assuming that Section107(1) empowers the State Government to make rules even in respect of matters covered underSection 102 of the Act and 1996 amended Rules when read closely, the irresistible conclusion whichwill have to be drawn would be that the said amended or substituted Rule is applicable only insofaras hearing and deciding the objections under Section 100 only and it does not extend toconsideration of objections filed under Section 102. Thus, it has to be necessarily held that Rule 5would be applicable only in respect of hearing and deciding objections to the proposal under Section100 and it is not relatable to consideration of objections filed under Section 102. In fact, the DivisionBench while disposing of W.P.No.158/2008 on 21.04.2011 has remitted the matter to the StateGovernment to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. It is also stated at the Bar that in the firstinstance, when the draft notifications came to be considered and notification dated 31.05.2007 cameto be issued, it was the State Government which had exercised the power without delegating itspower to any authority and this would also disclose that the State Government was fully conscious ofthe fact that it did not have power under Section 102 to delegate it to another authority by takingrecourse to Section 107(1) or the 1996 Rules to delegate its power.

41. From the foregoing discussions, it would emerge as under:

(i) Under Section 102 of the MV Act, the State Government was required to hear theaffected person in respect of proposed modification since State Government alonehas the power to cancel or modify an approved scheme.

(ii) The Karnataka State Transport Undertaking Rules, 1996 made in exercise of thepower conferred under Section 107 would not expressly confer power on the StateGovernment for considering of objections filed under Section 102 of the Act. Rule 5provides for consideration of the objections filed under Section 100 only.

(iii) The Rule making power available to the State Government under Section 107 (2) is confined tothe form in which any proposal regarding a scheme may be published under Section 99; the mannerin which objections may be filed under sub-

section (1) of Section 100; the manner in which objections may be considered and disposed of undersub-section (2) of Section 100; the form in which any approved scheme may be published undersub-section (3) of Section 100; the manner in which an application under sub-

section (1) of Section 103 can be made; the period within which owner may claim any article xxx saleof such article.

(iv) Rule 4 provides for the manner of filing objections to the proposal published under Section 99or modifications of the scheme under Section 102. Whereas, Rule 5 is confined for consideration ofobjections filed under Section 100 only and not objections filed under Section 102, evenpost-amendment of the Rules.



(v) The hearing authority in the instant case as could be seen from the original records in generaland particularly, the note of the Deputy Secretary dated 04.02.2015 would indicate therecommendation having been made to the Hon'ble Transport Minister for appointing any one of theauthorities indicated therein "to hear and decide the objections under Section 102 of Motor VehiclesAct, 1988", which came to be concurred by the Government namely, the Transport Minister wouldclearly indicate that State Government had delegated the power vested in it under Section 102 to bedecided by a delegated authority to hear and this is outside the scope of Section 102.

(vi) Though it is contended by the State Government as well as the STUs that the authority whoheard the matter was given the limited power of hearing, the impugned order would clearly indicatethat hearing authority had formulated the points for adjudication and had accordingly, adjudicatedthe same and thereafter concluded and recommended to the State Government for dropping thenotifications proposed to modify the schemes.

(vii) The State Government has approved the conclusion and recommendation of the hearingauthority without any application of mind.

(viii) Rule 5 of the Karnataka State Transport Undertaking Rules, 1996 is applicable only insofar ashearing and deciding the objections under Section 100 and said Rule cannot be extended to Section102 automatically or in other words, the substituted Rule 5(1) is to be read down as applicable orattracted for hearing and deciding the objections filed under Section 100 only.

42. For the reasons above stated, the impugned order dated 05.08.2015 cannot be sustained and assuch, the State Government is directed to re-do the matter in accordance with the Motor VehiclesAct, 1988 expeditiously, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of copy of thisorder.

43. However, the incidental question which would arise for consideration is:

"Whether the permit holders are to be allowed to operate during the interregnumperiod i.e., from the date on which the State Government would hear the objectionsand orders passed?"

44. The main thrust of argument on behalf of the operators is that they are operators of stagecarriage services on the basis of permits granted by the Competent Transport Authorities and saidpermits have been renewed from time to time. In the light of the Full Bench Judgment rendered inthe matter of KSRTC VS.

ASHRAFULLA KHAN in W.A.No.403/1988 disposed of on 16.11.1988 by opining that the 'BTSScheme' does not prohibit moffusil services going beyond the notified area or it is permissible totraverse on the notified routes / areas falling within village and town limits as necessity, transportauthorities are said to have granted several permits to private operators on the alleged publicinterest. The Hon'ble Apex Court in KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs.ASHRAFULLA KHAN reported in AIR 2002 SC 629 reversed the decision of the Full Bench and



held that view taken by the High Court that where traversing on a notified route is necessary tocontinue journey on a non-

notified route could be regarded as an intersection, is an erroneous view of law.

"25. Merely because a private operator has to traverse on the line of a notified routefor 5 km. or for 1.5 km. only is no ground to dispense with the mandate of law. Suchan overlapping also cannot be sustained on the ground it relates to a small town. Ifsuch a view of law as propounded by the Full Bench is to be accepted, it is difficult tobe applied where a notified route passes through bigger towns where involvement isof 10 to 20 km. within that town.

26. The view taken by the Full Bench that where traversing on a notified route isnecessary to continue journey on a non-notified route could be regarded as anintersection is an erroneous view of law. The High Court under Article 226 of theConstitution is required to enforce rule of law and not pass order of direction which iscontrary to what has been injuncted by law.

27. For the aforesaid reasons, we are of the view that the view taken by the HighCourt was contrary to the law which stood settled by this Court in Adarsh Travelscase (supra) and still holds the field and, therefore, it deserves to be set aside."

45. In the light of the above finding recorded by the Apex Court holding that law which stood settledin Adarsh Travels's case holds the field, it would be necessary and apt to notice the judgment of M/SADARSHA TRAVELS BUS SERVICE AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS reportedin AIR 1986 SC 319 whereunder it has been held that where a route is nationalized under ChapterVI-A of the Act (MV Act, 1939), Scheme totally prohibit private operators from plying stage carriageson route. It is also held that such private operator cannot ply on part of the route even with corridorrestrictions. It has been held as under:

"13. In Mysore State Road Transport Corporation vs. Mysore State TransportAppellate Tribunal, (1975) 1 SCR 615: (AIR 1974 SC 1940), all the earlier cases werenoticed and it was held:

"It is, therefore, apparent that where a private transport owner makes an applicationto operate on a route, which overlaps even a portion of the notified route i.e., wherethe part of the highway to be used by the private transport owner traverses on a lineon the same highway on the notified route, then that application has to be consideredonly in the light of the scheme as notified. If any conditions are placed then thoseconditions have to be fulfilled and if there is a total prohibition then the applicationmust be rejected....

This Court has consistently taken the view that if there is prohibition to operate on a notified routeor routes not licences can be granted to any private operator whose route traversed or overlapped



any part or whole of that notified route. The intersection of the notified route may not, in our view,amount to traversing or overlapping the route because the prohibition imposed applied to a wholeor part of the route on the highway on the same line of the route. An intersection cannot be said tobe traversing the same line, as it cuts across it."

The learned judges expressly dissented from the decision of Beg and Chandrachud, JJ, in MysoreState Transport Corpn vs. Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal, (1975) 1 SCR 493 and approved thedecisions of the Court in Nilkanth Prasad's case (supra) and Abdul Khader's case (supra). We agreewith the view taken by this Court in Mysore State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Mysore RevenueAppellate Tribunal, (1975) 1 SCR 615 : (AIR 1974 SC 1940) and dissent from the view taken inMysore State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal, (1975)1 SCR 493. Wehowever wish to introduce a note of caution. When preparing and publishing the scheme underS.68C and approving and modifying the scheme under S.68D care must be taken to protect, as far aspossible, the interest of the traveling public who could in the past travel from one point to anotherwithout having to change from one service to another en route. This can always be done byappropriate clauses exempting operators already having permits over common sector from thescheme and by incorporating appropriate conditional clauses in the scheme to enable them to plytheir vehicles over common sectors without picking up or setting down passengers on the commonsectors. If such a course is not feasible the State Legislature may intervene and provide some otheralternative as was done by the Uttar Pradesh Act No.27 or 76 by S.5 of which the competentauthority could authorize the holder of a permit of a stage carriage to ply his stage carriage on aportion of a notified route subject to terms and conditions including payment of licence fee. Theremay be other methods of not inconveniencing through passengers but that is entirely a matter forthe State Legislature, the State Government and the State Transport undertaking. But we do wish toemphasize that good and sufficient care must be taken to see that the traveling public is not to beneedlessly inconvenienced."

46. As to whether authorities can under the MV Act, 1988 can renew a permit granted under therepealed Act i.e., MV Act, 1939, came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Apex Court in the caseof GAJRAJ SINGH ETC. Vs. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERSreported in AIR 1997 SC 412 and it was held to the following effect:

"62. Accordingly, we hold that the named transport operators whose permits weresaved in the relevant scheme shall apply for permits under Section 70 and 71 andobtain permits afresh under Section 72 of the Act before the expiry of the periodmentioned in the permit issued either under Section 47 or Section 48 or renewalunder Section 58 or Section 68F(1D) of the Repealed Act. No third party/privateoperators are entitled to apply for permits on the same notified route or part thereof,nor are they entitled to compete with them for grant of permit, since the right of allother private operators to apply for and operate in the approved notified area, routeor a part thereof, has been frozen.

The right is reserved only in relation to the named operators and that too for specified permit, andnone else. Along with the application under Section 70 filed for grant of permit under Section 72 or



renewal under Section 81 made by the named holder of a specified permit in an approved scheme,he should enclose an authenticated copy of the approved scheme, the details of the route on whichhe was plying his stage carriage with corridor restrictions on over lapping routes. The RTA or STA,as the case may be, should verify the original scheme under which the named operator, whosespecified permit was saved, whether he is entitled to ply the stage carriage in the approved schemewith the condition of the corridor restrictions on the notified scheme and if so to what extent. Whatis the duration of his right saved in the approved scheme? Whether he had plied his stage carriageon complying with the law in force? His right to permit under Section 72 or renewal under Section81 cannot be higher than the original right saved in the approved scheme. The STU also should beheard in that behalf. On consideration of these and all other relevant facts in relation to grant ofstage carriage permit or renewal thereof, the appropriate authority may grant or reject; in the laterevent, for reasons to be recorded in support of the rejection. The authorities should consider theirapplications in accordance with the law and the prescribed procedure and may grant new permitsunder Section 72 and later on before the expiry thereof, to renew it in accordance with the procedureprescribed in Sections 80 and 81, that too on compliance with law, until the scheme is duly modifiedor cancelled in accordance with law. We reiterate that this right is available exclusively to the namedprivate operators and that too in respect of the specified permits and with same restrictionscontinued in the scheme and none else and no more."

47. Thus, the harbinger of the petitioners -

stage carriage operators claim as could be seen from the pleadings of the writ petitions is two fold;namely, (1) that permits granted in their favour is saved under the Scheme itself, and (2) evenotherwise the State with an intention to save the permits and the greater implication it could haveon the private operators had come up with the modification of the Schemes which has since beendropped under the G.O. dated 05.08.2015 which is now under consideration and as such, till adecision is taken thereunder no steps be taken to nullify the permits granted or a direction be issuedto continue the permits so issued by renewing till such time the State Government decides theobjection regarding modification of the scheme.

48. As already noticed hereinabove, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Adarsha Travels's case has held thatwhenever the State prepares and publishes the Scheme under Section 68C and approves or modifythe Scheme under Section 68D (old Act) then in such instances care must be taken to protect as foras possible the interest of traveling public which can be done by incorporating appropriate clausesexempting operators already having permits over common sector from the Scheme and byincorporating appropriate conditional clauses in the Scheme to enable them to ply their vehiclesover common sectors without picking up or setting down passengers of the common sectors.

It has also been observed by the Apex Court that if in the facts obtained in each case the StateTransport Undertaking may not be found not catering to the needs of the traveling public, it maymodify the Scheme so as to permit private operators to ply vehicles on such route / routes. Thus, theemphasis is not for additional services but to cater to the requirement of the passenger so as tocause least inconvenience to the traveling public. Thus, no operator would have right to compel theState to either modify or not to modify a Scheme.



49. On the one hand the petitioners are claiming to be the valid permit holders and such permits aresaved under the Scheme itself and some of the stage carriage operators are claiming that the permitsgranted by virtue of interim orders during the pendency of the consideration for modification of theSchemes they have been operating and as such, they should be permitted to continue to operate, isrequired to be examined in the light of aforestated position of law.

50. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of V. GOPI vs. RTA in W.A.No.1783/2006 disposedof on 04.01.2007 has held that any permit or licence can be treated as a valid one if the same isgranted by the authority competent to do so. It has been further held by the Division Bench thereinthat Court had permitted the appellant to operate the services which was only a concession grantedand same cannot be treated as a grant of permit or validation of the permit. Hence, it came to beheld that appellant therein cannot seek for extension of benefit on this ground.

51. The twenty approved schemes by the State of Karnataka under Section 68-D of the MV Act, 1939were saved under the MV Act, 1988. Chapter - VI of MV Act, 1988 which is in paramateria withChapter -

IVA of MV Act, 1939 which deals with special provisions relating to STUs and it overrides Chapter -V of MV Act, 1988. Section 102 of the MV Act provides for cancellation of modification of thescheme in the interest of public. Section 104 of MV Act, 1988 indicate that where the scheme ispublished, no permit should be granted to private operators except in accordance with theprovisions of the scheme. Once a scheme is notified it prohibits private vehicles to operate except aspermitted under the scheme. In fact, on publication of the scheme, private operators would not haveany right to claim permit to operate their vehicles on the notified area, route or portion thereofexcept to the extent permitted under the scheme itself.

If the scheme totally prohibits private operators from plying stage carriage service on notifiedroute/area, private operator cannot ply on part of route even with corridor restrictions. Thus, it boilsdown to the fact as to whether the existing schemes which enable the STUs to operate and ply itsvehicles in the route notified under the said scheme also enable the private operators to operate orin other words, whether such schemes would save any permit already in existence or not.

52. The authorities in their own manner and fashion have interpreted the law laid down by ApexCourt in ASHRAFULLA KHAN's case referred to supra and have been issuing the permits to theprivate stage carriage operators. This has been objected to by the STUs time and again. The DivisionBench while considering the plea of operators in this regard in W.P.NO.158/2008 and connectedmatters had noted that permits granted to stage carriages though had been cancelled by theappellate Tribunal, yet they have been operating their services on the strength of interim orderpassed by this Court. It was contended by the Stage Carriage Operators that in the event of DivisionBench arriving at a conclusion that modification is not in accordance with law, they should bepermitted to continue to operate their vehicles till further decision is taken by the State Governmentin accordance with law.



The Division Bench in the light of the notification dated 31.05.2007 being set aside had opined asunder:

"14. So far as other writ petition Nos.16990/2006 and connected matters areconcerned, in view of the submissions made by the petitioners in the said writpetitions, we hold that interest of justice would be met if they are permitted tooperate their vehicles for a period of three months from today as to as to protect theirinterest as the Government is given three months time to pass orders afresh inaccordance with law."

(emphasis supplied by me)

53. In the light of aforestated discussion, the authority hearing the objections willalso be required to examine the legality of permits which were granted to privateoperators and whether such permits granted to private operators were against theobservations made in ASHRAFULLA KHAN's case and whether on ASHRAFULLAKHAN being rendered by the Apex Court, all such permits which were in existence ason that date would automatically become illegal permits and it would be against thescheme or not. The hearing authority having opined that permits granted to theoperators were illegal permits, had relied upon the judgment of this Court renderedin W.P.NO.6507/2008 to hold that permits that were not originally valid or wereillegal and contrary to the statutory provisions cannot be saved by modification.

However, the fact that the said judgment had been set aside by the Division Bench inW.A.No.1408/2011 on 08.06.2011 had been lost sight of by the hearing authority. As such, the saidissue also requires to be examined by the hearing authority.

54. As could be seen from the records, the Transport Appellate Tribunal has affirmed the orders ofthe Regional Transport Authorities which had rejected the claim of the permit holders to continuethe permits on the ground that orders of cancellation of permits had reached finality or in otherwords, operators would not fall within the exempted clause of the respective schemes. The saidorders of Tribunal are also the subject matter of these proceedings in the second set of writpetitions. These writ petitioners have very heavily relied upon the order dated 18.12.2014 of theHon'ble Apex Court whereunder the matter has been remitted back to the State Government andwhich has been the subject matter in the first set of writ petitions by contending that issue regardingcut-off dates was also required to be considered by the State Government under the impugned orderdated 05.08.2015 and same having not been considered, it is also under challenge, as a ground tosustain these writ petitions namely, second set of writ petitions.

55. The State Government exercising the power conferred under Chapter - VI of the MV Act, 1988 aswell as similar provisions that existed in the repealed Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 has issued severalschemes of nationalization partly or totally prohibiting a private operator from obtaining a permiton the area or route exclusively reserved for operation of services by STU.



These schemes prohibited grant of permits to private operators. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the caseof KSRTC VS ASHRAFULLA KHAN AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2002 SC 629 has held that nopermit can be granted to operate on a notified route or portion thereof if the scheme prohibits suchoperation by a private operator and the only exception is where a private operator holding permit onnon-notified route has to intersect on a notified route and as such, it was held a smallportion/portions falling within the limits of a town or a village on a nationalized route (notifiedroute) are not to be treated as intersection of the notified route but as overlapping and therefore, itis not permissible to grant permit on the route. It has been held by the Apex Court "that view takenby the Full Bench that where traversing on a notified route is necessary to continue journey on anon-notified route could be regarded as an intersection is an erroneous view of law. The High Courtunder Article 226 of the Constitution is required to enforce rule of law and not pass order ordirection which is contrary to what has been injuncted by law." In fact, the Apex Court has held inthe case of H.C.NARAYANAPPA vs STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1960 SC1073 that scheme is a law and the action of the State in framing a scheme excluding the privateoperator is immune from the attack as violative of fundamental rights.

56. It would also be apt and appropriate to notice at this juncture that Hon'ble Apex Court inADARSHA TRAVEL BUS SERVICE vs STATE OF U.P.

reported in AIR 1986 SC 319 as well as in the case of KSRTC vs ASHRAFULLA KHAN reported inAIR 2002 SC 629 has held that paramount consideration was not that of right of private operatorsto continue to operate their services but on eliminating the inconvenience as for as possible to thecommuting passengers. Thus, it cannot be gain said by the private operators that a right is vested tothem so as to compel the State Government to modify or not to modify the existing scheme. It iscompletely within the domain of the State Government to exercise its power under Section 102 inthe interest of travelling public.

Thus, any permit which came to be granted by the authority competent to do so and which is inaccordance with the provisions of the Act, can only be treated as valid permit and concession givenby the State Government or the interim orders granted by the Courts cannot be treated as a grant ofpermit or validation of the permit so granted. Thus, what was required to be examined andconsidered by the Tribunal was as to "whether the permits granted to the operators was saved underthe relevant schemes which they are so claiming or not? Or "whether the permits issued to thepetitioners (in second set of writ petitions) were saved under the relevant schemes or not? And, if sosaved, would they be entitled for renewal of such permits by keeping in mind the principlesenunciated in GAJARAJ SINGH's case by the Apex Court reported in AIR 1987 SC 412 at paragraph62. These fundamental questions cannot be gone into by this Court and as such, it would suffice ifthe matter is remitted to the Tribunal for adjudication afresh in the light of the observations madeherein above. It is needless to state that the STUs would also be at liberty to lodge their objectionsand contest the claim of operators and in such an event, the Tribunal shall consider all thecontentions in accordance with law.

57. In the light of the above discussion, I proceed to pass the following:



ORDER

(i) Order No.SARE 140 SAEPA 2011, Bengaluru dated 05.08.2015 passed by first respondent ishereby quashed and "first set of writ petitions" referred to in the judgment are remitted back to thefirst respondent for being heard afresh. First respondent is directed to dispose of the same inaccordance with law and in the light of observations made herein above within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of copy of this order or production of certified copy of this order byaffording opportunity of hearing to all the concerned as has been directed by Hon'ble Apex Court inB.A.LINGAREDDY ETC. vs KSTA reported in AIR 2015 SC

767.

(ii) Insofar as petitioners in "first set of writ petitions" are concerned, they would be entitled tooperate their vehicles only in the event of they are holding or having permits which are valid as ondate and if they are authorised to run the vehicles otherwise for a period of three months fromtoday.

(iii) The orders passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal in "second set of writpetitions" rejecting the appeals/revision petitions are hereby set aside and matters are remitted backto the Tribunal for adjudication afresh in the light of observations made herein above.

Tribunal is directed to dispose of the same afresh within a period of three months from the datereceipt of copy of this order or production of certified copy of this order by affording opportunity ofhearing to petitioners / appellants, rival claimants if any and concerned State TransportUndertakings.

(iv) Writ petitioners in "second set of writ petitions" would be at liberty to seek for grant oftemporary permits by filing appropriate applications before jurisdictional State Transport Authorityand in the event of such applications being filed, the jurisdictional State Transport Authority wouldbe at liberty to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law and also keeping in mindobservation made hereinabove and pass orders thereon within 10 days from the date of filing of suchapplications. In the event of authorities granting such permits, they shall ensure that it shall be validduring the pendency of revision petitions or appeals pending before Karnataka State TransportAppellate Tribunal or for a period of four (4) months whichever is earlier..

(v) No order as to costs.

This Court places on record its appreciation for the able assistance rendered by all the learnedAdvocates appearing for the parties.

SD/-

JUDGE *sp/DR



Sri B Athaulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 May, 2017

Documents

Transcript of Sri B Athaulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 May, 2017