Seeking Information Sharing Risk Perception Actual Mitigating Practices Self-Efficacy...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Seeking Information Sharing Risk Perception Actual Mitigating Practices Self-Efficacy...
• Signs – stands for something and causes the observer to connect and deduce; physical things (dark clouds are signs of impending rain)
• Symbols – something visible represenGng something invisible (words as symbols) – words can be removed from its context
Theory as Abstract Ideas
• An abstract scheme of thought about communicaGon – Rhetorical theory – Media criGcism
• Theorizing involves imagined events • ObservaGon is the main business of empirical research
Theory as Predictable Findings
• Consistent research result (posiGvist view of knowledge) – Individuals who do not know much about an issue is unlikely to seek informaGon about it, for instance, but when an argument reaches them they may be more readily persuaded than are those with a stronger backlog of knowledge.
A schemaGc view of theorizing
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable Proposi'on
Op. def. IV-‐1
Op. def. IV-‐2
Op. def. DV-‐1
Op. def. DV-‐2
Explica'on of IV
Explica'on of DV
Conceptual Level
OperaGonalLevel
Hypotheses
Variable
• A variable is an object, event, idea, feeling, Gme period, or any other type of category you are trying to measure
• Independent – stands alone and isn’t changed by the other variables
• Dependent – something that depends on other factors
Easy way to remember the difference in IV and DV
• (Independent variable) causes change in (Dependent Variable) and it isn’t possible that (Dependent Variable) could cause a change in (Independent Variable)
Concept ExplicaGon
• Process of describing some definable phases in thinking through one’s plan for a study 1. Preliminary idenGficaGon • Oxymoron – combinaGon of words that are mutually
contradictory (public opinion, mass communicaGon, opinion change, virtual reality)
• Eponymic honor (a person giving their name to their discovery – Likert, Pearson)
2. Preliminary DefiniGon -‐ Study the ways other researchers have been using the concept, what they mean by it and how it is represented in their studies
-‐ Percepts – meaning that we perceive them in ourselves and others
-‐ Concepts connect percepts
3. ObservaGon -‐ Observe human acGvity -‐ Gather evidences
-‐ Read newspapers, record statements -‐ Observe children watch TV -‐ Edit a video presentaGon in an experimental lab -‐ Call randomly selected phone numbers -‐ Observe people in a meeGng
PrimiGve and derived terms
• ConceptualizaGon is built of words, and we must find the best place to start building
• PrimiGve words – commonly understood or given (Hempel, 1952)
• DerivaGve terms – derived from primiGve words (i.e. person – communiGes/socieGes, word – sentence/message)
• Time and space
Validity
• Does the operaGonal definiGon represent the concept as we have defined it? Are we measuring what we intend to measure?
• Internal validity – what is done, what is found and what is inferred within a single study
• External validity – generalizability of a parGcular study to other seengs, Gmes, or units of study
• Reliability – replicability of a result across a series of observaGons or studies
Problem: measure radio-‐listening habits of people QuesGon: Did you listen to news on the radio yesterday? Reliable but not valid
QuesGon: How many days a week do you typically listen to news on the radio?
Units of Analysis
• Is it an ahribute of individual persons, of aggregates such as communiGes or naGons, of messages, of events, or of some other unit?
• Inconsistency in the unit of analysis is a common error in communicaGon research
RelaGonship to Time
• If a concept is an ahribute of individuals, does it vary across persons at a given point in Gme (cross-‐secGonal variance) or across Gmes for a given person (process variance)?
Cross secGonal
Aetude Aetude change Process
Literature Review
• ExplicaGon can help to bound a search on a concept, by sorGng out those few wriGngs that deal with the idea being developed
• Skim quickly past arGcles that involve the term being used but not the same meaning, at the same Gme looking for research involving the concept even though the name is not the same
Meaning analysis
• Sort out the various meanings and terms into groups
• Linz and Malamuth (1993)
Obscenity
ConservaGve-‐moralist
Pornography
Feminist
Ero5ca
Liberal
OperaGonal conGngencies
• A literature review can organize studies alongside one another and explore differences among them
• Take note of historical Gme, place, and research method
• SorGng out literature in terms of these operaGonal conGngencies helps you comprehend the potenGal range of measures and adjudicate conflicGng findings
Synthesis
• Literature review omen becomes a study in itself • Diffusion of InnovaGon (Rogers, 1964, 1983)
Empirical DefiniGon
• Begin with reading few studies, then moves to explicaGon, refines the preliminary definiGon, and returns to the literature search with a sharper definiGon
• Rules of inclusion and exclusion
Conceptual Models
• Stake out significant concepts in the field, to codify scahered findings of the past and weave them into a single conceptual framework which will help give direcGon and focus future work (Westley, 1958, p. 313)
• A model “seeks to show the main elements of any structure or process and the relaGonship between [and among] these elements” (McQuail & Windahl, 1993, p. 2)
Simple model directs research ahenGon to the source, the message, the channel, the receiver, and the outcome or consequences
Berlo (1960) elaborated his own source-‐message-‐channel-‐receiver paradigm that became a standard for the analysis of human communicaGon processes for a decade
Osgood & Schramm Model of CommunicaGon
CommunicaGon is dynamic process where there is a healthy interacGve relaGonship between the source and the receiver
Advantages of Models 1. Organizing funcGon – Gives general picture of a range of different
parGcular circumstances
2. Explain – Provides simplified informaGon. Models have
heurisGc funcGon
3. Predict outcomes – Provides basis for assigning probabiliGes and
formulaGng outcomes
Sample Research
• The study explored the risk percepGon among residents and whether or not they have done any miGgaGon effort in the event of “the big one”.
• How is the earthquake miGgaGon behavior of residents of Brgy. Barangka, Marikina affected by their subjecGve knowledge, self-‐efficacy, and risk-‐percepGon?
Living on a Fault Line Earthquake Preparedness Profile of Residents of
Barangay Barangka, Marikiina City
Subjec5ve Knowledge
Risk Perception
Self-Efficacy
Informa5on Seeking
Information Sharing
Actual Mitigating Practices
Socio-‐Demographic
• Age • Gender • Civil Status • EducaGonal Ahainment
Mi5ga5ng Behavior
Sample Study
• What is the impact of the Dove Real Beauty Campaign on the concept of beauty, brand image, and purchase behavior among selected female university students?
Sample Study
• How do media rouGne, organizaGonal characterisGcs and editorial independence come into play in developing the programming model of Philippine public television?