SAR Report for MBA Program MBA 2021 - NIT Kurukshetra
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of SAR Report for MBA Program MBA 2021 - NIT Kurukshetra
PREFACE
Education is a very important cog for a nation’s growth. It is a vital aspect that helps the whole
human entity in the socio, economic, cultural, scientific and technological fronts. Thus NIT
Kurukshetra as an Institution of National Importance has been mandated to provide high quality
education. With a heritage of over 55 years the institute has prepared graduates of U.G., P.G. and
Ph.D. levels who are contributing productively in the social, economic, cultural, scientific and
technological growth at levels of community, country and globe.
Established in 1963 as Regional Engineering College, Kurukshetra, the status of the institute was
upgraded to National Institute of Technology in the year 2002.The Department of Business
Administration was established in 2006. The faculty members, commensurate with the work
culture of NIT, demonstrate dedication and commitment towards preparing market and industry
ready graduates.
As a common policy of imparting high quality education, the Department of Business
Administration under took the project of NBA accreditation along with all other Technology
Departments. The faculty members of the department are well aware of philosophy OUTCOME
BASED EDUCATION (OBE) implying high quality learning outcomes for most of the students
pursuing MBA programme. The faculty members have demonstrated deeper concern and
dedication with the focus of better learning by students while preparing self-assessment report
(SAR).
The Department is preparing itself by discussions and consultations to welcome the NBA’s expert
peer team with the motivation to acquire NBA accreditation for period of six years. The
Department is trying to improve quality consciousness not only in academic matters but all allied
operations and activities happening in the Department.
It gives me immense pleasure to welcome the NBA peer team to National Institute of Technology,
Kurukshetra and for their subsequent valuable observation and recommendations for continuous
quality improvement of all operations and activities of the Department.
Table of Content
Page No
Part A
Criteria 1 01
Criteria 2 05
Criteria 3 33
Criteria 4 284
Criteria 5 295
Criteria 6 310
Criteria 7 330
Criteria 8 340
Criteria 9 357
Criteria 10 358
Declaration 365
Annexure 366
Vision, Mission & Program Educational Objectives
Governance, Leadership & Financial Resources
Program Outcomes & Course Outcomes
Curriculum & Learning Process
Student Quality and Performance
Faculty Attributes and Contributions
Industry & International Connect
Infrastructure
Alumni Performance and Connect
Continuous Improvement
PART A- Profile of the Institute
1. Name and Address of the Institution: Department of Business Administra tion
National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra
City: -Kurukshetra
State: -Haryana Pin Code: -136119
Website: -nitkkr.ac.in E-mail: [email protected]
STD Code: (+91)1744 Phone No: 01744- 233524
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University, if applicable: N.A.
3. Year of Establishment of the Institution: 2006 under Self Financing Scheme
2012 Department Regularized 4. Type of the Institution:
Institute of National Importance √ Autonomous
University AICTE Approved PGDM Institutions
Deemed University Any other (Please specify) *
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government √ Trust
State Government Society
Government Aided Section 25 Company
Self-financing Any Other (Please specify) *
*Provide Details:
6. Vision of the Institution:
“To be a role model in technical education and research responsive to global challenges.”
7. Mission of the Institution
M1: To impart quality technical education that develops innovative professionals and
entrepreneurs.
M2: To undertake research that generates cutting-edge technologies and futuris t ic
knowledge, focusing on the socio-economic needs.
8. Details of all the programs offered by the Institution
Sl No.
Program Name Year of start
Intake at the start of the
program
Increase in intake if any (from the
start)
Year of increase
AICTE Approval
Accreditation Status*
1. Master of
Business Administration
2006 60 Decreased=7 2019-20 NA Applying first
time
* Write applicable one:
Applying first time
Granted provisional accreditation for two/three years for the period (specify period)
Granted accreditation for 5/6 years for the period (specify period)
Not accredited (specify visit dates, year)
Withdrawn (specify visit dates, year)
Not eligible for accreditation
Eligible but not applied
Note: Add rows as needed
9. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application
S.
No.
Program Name Current Year
Sanctioned Intake
Current Year
admitted Nos.
1. Master of Business Administration
10. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if
designated:
i. Head of the Department: -
Name: -Dr. Rajender Kumar Designation: - Professor
Status of Appointment: -Regular
Phone No: - +91-1744-233525 Mobile: - +91-9416412100
E-mail: [email protected]
Department of Business Administration Page 1
CRITERIA 1: VISON MISSION & PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE
1.1 Vision and Mission statements (5)
Vision of Department
To be a role model in management education and research responsive to global challenges.
Mission of Department
M-1: To impart quality management education.
M-2: To develop innovative professionals, entrepreneurs, and researchers.
M-3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the growth of industry, society and
futuristic knowledge focusing on the socio-economic needs.
1.2. PEOs Statements (5)
PEO 1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
PEO 2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution to accomplish the dynamic socio-
economic needs.
PEO 3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of industry and society.
PEO 4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
1.3 Dissemination among stakeholders (10)
The above vision and mission statements were percolated down to the key stakeholders i.e.
students past and present, faculty, staff, members of various advisory councils of the institute; and
parents through a systematic diffusion process.
Our Vision and Mission Statements are:
1. Published at our Website www.nitkkr.ac.in
2. Disseminated during Board of Governors Meeting
3. Disseminated during Senate Meeting
4. Disseminated during Area Advisory Council Meeting
Department of Business Administration Page 2
5. Disseminated during Student Orientation Program
6. Disseminated during Student Re-registration Program
7. Disseminated during Alumni Meetings (through Alumni website page)
8. Prominently displayed in all the Faculty cubicles.
9. Prominently displayed at departmental library
10. Prominently displayed at in the corridors and class rooms
11. Published in our Admission Brochures
12. Published in our Placement Brochures
The vision, mission and PEO’s are disseminated to the stakeholders of the program as shown in
figure 1.
Figure 1: Various types of stakeholders and information disseminating channel
1.4 Formulation process (15)
The Department framed its vision, mission and PEO’s through consultative process and
presentation followed by discussions in groups of various levels as shown in figure 2. It includes
major leadership teams like Senate, BOS (Board of Studies) and Departmental Advisory
Committee comprising of three Area Advisory Committee of the Department. Thus, it is an
inclusive exercise for incorporating new trends and technologies emerging in all the three areas
Stakeholders
Internal
Management
Support
Staff
Students
Faculty
External
Employers
Industry
Alumni
Funding Agencies
Channel of Communication
Institution Website (www.nit.kkr.ac.in)
Orientation program
Student Lounge
Alumni Meetings
Library
Newsletter
Department of Business Administration Page 3
(finance, marketing and HRM). The Departmental Advisory Committee (DAC) prepared the
proposed changes in outcome statements such as PEOs, POs and CO’s.
Figure 2: Flow diagram for Formulation Process of Vision, Mission and PEOs of the
program
1.5 Consistency of PEO’s with the Mission (15)
Mapping Elements Justification
M1: To impart quality management education.
PEO1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
Correlation: 2
Quality management education
implies better career prospects
M2: To develop innovative professionals,
entrepreneurs and researchers.
PEO1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
Correlation:3
For growing career in ever changing
different sectors of business creativity
and innovativeness is absolutely
essential.
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the
growth of industry, society and futuristic knowledge
focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEO1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
Correlation:2
To become a successful manager the
students must be having an effective
information decision-making skill to
give a best performance in an
organization.
M1: To impart quality management education.
PEO2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution
to accomplish the dynamic socio-economic needs.
Correlation:1
Quality management education
ensures inculcating innovative
attitude in graduates using creative
and innovative delivery methods
through internal and external
resources.
M2: To develop innovative professionals,
entrepreneurs and researchers.
Innovative professionals need
qualities of leadership and research
abilities. The department inculcates
Senate
Board of
Studies
Department
Advisory
Committee
Department of Business Administration Page 4
PEO2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution
to accomplish the dynamic socio-economic needs.
Correlation:3
such qualities through intensive
participative learning using methods
like case studies, group discussions,
workshops and seminars etc.
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the
growth of industry, society and futuristic knowledge
focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEO2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution
to accomplish the dynamic socio-economic needs.
Correlation:2
Entrepreneurial and experimental
aptitude will help to survive in
challenging business environment.
The department is indoctrinating these
skills through internship, live projects,
dissertations and alumni meets.
M1: To impart quality management education.
PEO3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of
industry and society.
Correlation:1
Quality education will enhance
research insight and solid platform in
students which further help them
arriving at optimal judge-mental
abilities solving for complex
problems blocking general growth in
industry.
M2: To develop innovative professionals,
entrepreneurs and researchers.
PEO3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of
industry and society.
Correlation:3
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the
growth of industry, society and futuristic knowledge
focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEO3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of
industry and society.
Correlation:2
Generation of futuristic knowledge
resources require research
competencies and conduction
abilities. New knowledge help in
solving day to day and long-term
problem which may otherwise slow
down the progress in industry.
M1: To impart quality management education.
PEO4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
Correlation:1
Quality education means imparting
right attitudes risk taking confidence
and projecting the profitability of
business undertaking. Such ethical
and risk-taking attitude is absolutely
necessary for successful
entrepreneurs.
M2: To develop innovative professionals,
entrepreneurs and researchers.
PEO4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
Correlation:3
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the
growth of industry, society and futuristic knowledge
focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEO4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
Correlation:1
Department of Business Administration Page 5
CRITERION 2: GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP & FINANCIAL
RESOURCES (100)
2.1 – Governance and Leadership (60)
2.1.1 – Governance Structure and Policies (25)
2.1.1.1 – Governing Structure (10)
(List the governing, senate, and all other academic and administrative bodies; their
memberships, functions, and responsibilities; frequency of the meetings; and attendance
therein, details of monitoring of performance done by the BOG. A few sample minutes of the
meetings and action-taken reports should be annexed)
List of Governing structure
Institutional Governance
1. BOG
2. Director
3. Senate
4. BOS
5. Committees:
Departmental Management
1. HOD
2. DAC- Departmental Advisory Committee, DRC- Departmental Research
Committee, DPC- Departmental Purchase Committee (their memberships,
functions, and responsibilities are given in annexure).
3. Coordinators of streams
4. Faculty
Details of monitoring of performance done by the BOG
THE DIRECTOR AND HIS POWERS
https://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/STORES_AND_PURCHAS_RULES_2008.PDF
1. The Director of the Institute shall be appointed by the visitor on contract basis on the
recommendation of ·a Selection Committee constituted by him consisting of at least
five members including the Chairman who are experts in the field of technical education
with experience at national and international level.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 6
2. The Director shall be appointed for a period of five years and shall be governed by the
terms and conditions of the Contract of Service entered in to between the Institute and
the Director as per the form specified in Schedule-A.
3. Subject to the budget provisions made for the specific purpose. The Director shall have
the power to incur expenditure in accordance with the procedure as may be laid down
in the ordinances.
4. The Director shall have the power to appropriate funds with respect to different items
constituting the recurring budget up to a limit specified for the Head of Department in
the central government for each item:
Provided that 'such appropriation shall not involve any increase in the budget
and any liability in future years:
Provided further that every such appropriation shall, as soon as possible, be
reported to the Board.
5. The Director shall have the power to write off irrecoverable losses up to a limit of ten
thousand rupees and of irrecoverable value of store items lost or rendered unserviceable
due to normal wear and tear or obsolete up to a limit of twenty five thousand rupees
subject to such stipulations as may be made by the Board from time to time.
6. The Director shall have the power to donate obsolete equipment or store items, as
identified by a Committee constituted for this purpose by the Director, to any
educational institution in the vicinity of the Institute up to such limits as maybe decided
by the Board from time to time.
7. The Director, where he is the appointing authority, shall have the power to fix on the
recommendations of the Selection Committee, the initial pay of an incumbent at a stage
higher than the minimum of the scale, but not involving more than five increments, in
respect of posts to which appointment can be made by him under the powers vested in
him by the provision of the Act or these statutes.
8. The Director shall have the power to employ Teaching Supporting Staff in the
Laboratories, Technicians or Technical Instructors' and Skilled Workmen, paid from
contingencies from time to time, for not more than one year on such remuneration as
may be decided by the Board.
9. The Director shall have the- power to send members of the staff for training or to attend
course of instruction inside India subject to such terms and conditions as may be
specified by the ordinances. ·
10. The Director shall have the power to sanction temporary allocation of any building for
any purpose other than that for which it was constructed.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 7
11. If for any reason the Registrar is temporarily absent for a period not exceeding one
month the Director may take over or assign to any faculty member or member of staff
of the Institute, any of the functions of the Registrar as he deems fit:
Provided that if at any time the temporary absence of the Registrar exceeds one month
the Board may, if it thinks fit, authorize the Director to take over or assign the function
of the Registrar for a period exceeding one month.
12. All contracts for and behalf of the Institute except the one between the Institute and the
Director shall when authorized by a resolution of the Board passed in that behalf be in-
writing and be expressed to be made in the name of the Institute and every such contract
shall be executed on behalf of the Institute by the Director, but shall not be personally
liable in respect of anything under such contract.
13. The director may during his absence from headquarters, specifically authorize in
writing the Deputy Director or in his absence, one of the Deans or the Senior most
professor present to sanction advances travelling allowance, contingencies and medical
treatment of the staff and sign and counter sign bills on his behalf.
14. The Director may at his discretion constitute such committees, as he may consider
appropriate for smooth functioning of the Institute.
15. In the event of the occurrence of any vacancy in the office of the Chairperson by reason
of his death resignation or otherwise or in the event of the Chairperson being unable to
discharge his functions owing to absence illness or any other cause, the Director may
discharge the functions assigned to the Chairperson under section16 of the Act.
16. The Director may, with the approval of the Board delegate any of his powers,
authorities or responsibilities vested in him by virtue of the Act and Statutes to one or
more members of Academic or Administrative Staff of the Institute.
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT/CENTRE
1. Each Department and Centre of the Institute shall be placed in charge of a Head who
shall be selected by the Director, from amongst the Professor and Associate Professors
of that Department or Centre.
a. Provided that if a Department or Centre has no Professor or Associate Professor,
the Director may appoint an Assistant Professor of that Department of Centre
to head the Department or Centre.
2. The Head of a Department or Centre shall hold his post for a term of two year , Provided
that after the expiry of his term of office, he shall continue to hold office till the
appointment of his successor
a. Provided further that no person shall head a Department or Centre continuously
for a period exceeding three year unless he is specially appointed at least for a
second term.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 8
3. The Director may himself take temporary charge of a Department or place it under the
charge of the Deputy Director or a Professor from another department for a period not
exceeding six months.
4. The Head of Department shall be responsible for the entire working of the Department
subject to the general control and supervision of the Director.
5. The Head of Department shall be duty bound to see that the decisions of the authorities
of the Institute arid of Director are faithfully carried out. He shall perform such other
duties as may be assigned to him by the Director or Senate.
6. When appointment to the post of Head of Department or Centre becomes due, the
Director ·shall ascertain the willingness, of the persons eligible to be appointed as Head
for being so appointed and shall generally select a person’s by rotation from among
eligible and willing persons.
7. Whenever it is proposed to deviate from the principle of rotation, such appointment
shall be made only with the prior approval of the Chairperson, Board of Governors and
for reasons to be recorded in writing and shall also be reported to the Senate and the
Board along with reasons for deviation, in their nest meetings.
BOARD OF STUDIES COMPOSITION
1. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik Chairman
2. Prof. T.J Kamalanabhan, IIT Madras External Expert
3. Prof. Alok Rai, BHU Varanasi External Expert
4. Prof. Rajender Kumar Member
5. Dr. Mohd. Firoz Member
Responsibilities:
The Constitution of the Board of Studies of each department of the institute in the faculty of
the Institute as decided by the Board will be as under:
1. The Chairman of the Department will be Chairman of the BOS.
2. All Professors of the Departments.
3. Three Assistant Professors and three Lecturers from the Department to be nominated
by the Director, NIT by rotation according to seniority for a period of three years.
4. Two outside experts to be nominated by the Director, NIT from the panel recommended
by the Chairman of the Department for a period of three years.
It has been felt that instead of one Board of Studies for Applied Sciences & Humanities
Department there should be four separate Board of Studies for the Departments of Physics,
Chemistry, Mathematics and Humanities. Accordingly, this matter is being placed before
the Board of Governors in their 2nd meeting to be held on 19.04.2003.
The Constitution of any Board of Studies may be changed amended by the Director, if need
so arises from time to time. However, the number of outside experts on any Board of
Studies may be increased by the Senate.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 9
The Powers & functions of Board of Studies of each Department will be as under:
1. To recommend the procedure for the conduct of Undergraduate/Postgraduate
examinations/Ph.D. program/courses of study and syllabi.
2. To recommend the panel of examiners of various subjects/various examinations.
3. To formulate institute level policy and coordinate as well as review. Curricula, Time-
schedules, evaluation of academic performance of student’s research activities of
students, academic awards practical training, academic planning with regard to new
activities and review of existing departments and centres.
4. To establish liaison with Industry and to regulate-Consultancy Projects, Sponsored R&
Projects, Sponsored and Industry based Short-term Courses, patents and technical
knowhow transfer of Industry and Inter- Institutional Collaborative Links abroad.
5. To deal with any matter that may be referred to by the Senate.
The Director of the Institute may delegate any other power & function to the Board of Studies
as he deems fit.
DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
1. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik In Chair
2. Prof. Rajender Kumar Professor
3. Prof. Gian Bhushan Dean (academic)
4. Prof. Ashutosh Kumar Singh Head, Computer Applications
5. Prof. Sathans Professor, Electrical Engineering.
Responsibilities:
The DRC/SRC shall consist of the following, provided each member qualifies to be a Ph.D.
supervisor;
(i) HOD/School Coordinator
(ii) All Professors of the Department
(iii) Three Associate Professors of the department by rotation. The term of an Associate
Professor will be 2 years, the changeover taking effect on 1st July (every year).
(iv) One External Expert for a tenure of two years (from panel of six experts)**
(v) Supervisors of the scholars.
They do not, however, constitute the regular members (unless covered under (i) or
(ii) or (iii). They participate in DRC/SRC meetings only when the cases of their
respective scholars are taken up.
For applied Sciences Departments/Schools/MBA/MCA. If the number of
total members including Chairman comes out to be less than 5, then
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 10
additional members of Professor Level may be nominated by the Hon’ble
Director.
For Engineering departments, if total number of members including
Chairman comes out to be less than 7, then additional members of Professor
Level may be nominated by the Hon’ble Director.
* The HOD/School Coordinator shall be the Chairman of the DRC/SRC. If
the HOD/Scholl Coordinator does not qualify to be a Ph.D. supervisor, the
senior most qualifying faculty member of the Department will act as the
Chairman of the DRC. Faculty members, qualified to be the supervisors, can
only be members of DRC. If Chairman of the DRC/SRC is not able to attend
a DRC/SRC meeting due to compelling reasons, senior most DRC/SRC
members will work as Chairman, DRC/SRC.
**Panel of six experts to be recommend by the respective DRC/SRC. These
should be Professor or equivalent from IIT/NIT/IIM/IISc/IISER/R&D
Organizations/Industry.
#If a Co-Supervisor of the scholar is from outside NIT Kurukshetra but from
within the country, he will be invited for the DRC/SRC meeting whenever
his scholar’s comprehensive, pre-synopsis seminar and final examination is
taken up. In all such cases, he will be paid TA/DA by the Institute as per
rules.
DRC/SRC requires the approval of Director as and when required. At least
50% of the total members should be present during the proceedings of
DRC/SRC. Minutes of all DRC meetings will be sent to Dean (Academic).
DEPARTMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
1. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik In Chair
2. Prof. Rajender Kumar Member
3. Dr. Mohd. Firoz Member
Responsibilities:
As per the Senate Item 18.4: To consider and decide the amendments to the role of
BOS, DRC and DAC:
The Senate approved the role of DAC, DRC and BOS with minor amendments as under.
A) Constitution and functions of Departmental Advisory Committee (DAC)
The composition of DAC is as under:
i) Head of the Department.
ii) All Professor of the Department.
iii) Two Associate Professors and two Assistant Professors in order of seniority by
rotation for 2 year.
iv) The Head of the Department shall constitute the DAC and approved by the
Director.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 11
B) Functions of DAC:
The DAC shall discharge the following functions.
1. To appoint Course coordinators for UG/PG courses and external examiners for
M. Tech./MBA/MCA programs.
2. Advising the Head of the Department regarding policies and procedures for
Academic Programs and other Departmental Affairs for smooth function of the
Department.
3. Periodical reviewing of the UG/PG courses and recommending updation/
modification of syllabi to BOS from time to time.
DEPARTMENTAL PURCHASE COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
1. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik In Chair
2. Prof. Rajender Kumar Member
3. Dr. Mohd. Firoz Member
Responsibilities:
The DPC will take decision on all matter related to purchase in the Department.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 13
2.1.1.2 – Service Rules (5)
The service rules for the employees are available on the website and in the institute for their
reference. The service book has also been given to all staff members with the help of an email and
if any changes or amendment is done that is also notified to the staff. The institute has a very clear
policy on the transparency. To ensure the notice reaches everyone the department does its best to
communicate the same via multiple channels such as website, email, notice board, meetings, verbal
announcement etc.
The institute has rules relating to Holidays, Work Time & Workdays, Salary, Performance
Appraisal, Other Benefits related to salary, Recruitment & Selection Process, Leave Rules, TA/DA
rules, Career Advancement, Consultancy and other general rules. The institute has put his best step
forward in designing these rules in the complete fairness in order to ensure equality and fairness.
MACP Rules
MACPS allows three financial up gradations in the career of a central government employee.
Counting for up gradation under MACPS starts from the direct entry grade on completion of 10,
20, 30 year services respectively. For complete information; check the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/MACP%20Scheme.pdf
Memorandum of Association of NIT
MOA provides rules for National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. Full information is
provided in the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/nit_kuk/docs/MOA.pdf
Memorandum of Association of RECK
Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi has upgraded the REC Kurukshetra to
National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra with the status of Deemed University w.e.f.
26.6.2002. The NIT Kurukshetra has also been registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI
of 1860 on 9th April, 2003. For more information, check the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/nit_kuk/docs/ReckRules.pdf
Qualification for teaching
The qualification for making recruitment of lecturers, Assistant Professor and Professor for
different departments is given in the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/nit_kuk/docs/Teaching.pdf
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 14
Qualification for Non-teaching
The qualification for making recruitment of non-teaching staff for different departments is given
in the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/nit_kuk/docs/Non_Teaching.pdf
Career Advancement Scheme (CAS)
The eligibility criteria to move from one grade to another for teaching staff is given in the link
below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/sub_courses.php?id=305
Central Civil Services – Leave Rules
These rules shall apply to government servants appointed to the civil services and post in
connection with the affairs of the union, but shall not apply to some of the categories of persons.
The required information is provided in the link below:
http://nitkkr.ac.in/nit_kuk/docs/CLR.pdf
2.1.1.3. Policies (5)
The Department follows same guidelines and policies that have been set by the Institute. The
Institute has well defined policies and guidelines for its entire faculty, students, alumni and other
stakeholders. The Institute has also initiated and developed these policies with the help of the
stakeholders. The inputs and suggestions provided by the stake holders have made it possible to
amend the policy guidelines from time to time.
The institute has well defined guidelines for almost all the domains for which it requires to have
the guidelines. Academic, placement, admission, hostel related, anti-ragging etc. all such
guidelines are covered in the policy book.
CODE OF CONDUCT IN NIT KURUKSHETRA
Clause 1: General
Every employee should come on time in the institution on working days.
No employees shall indulge in any verbal quarrel or any violent activity with staff or any
student.
No employee shall use public address system in the institute without authorized permission.
No employee shall hurt any religious sentiments of nay staff or any student in the
institution.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 15
Clause 2: Unfair Means &Plagiarism
No employee shall indulge in any unfair practice with the official work and any other
research project or academics.
Every employee should conduct himself with honesty and integrity in the institution.
Any such report with plagiarism will not be accepted by the institution.
Clause 3: Taking part in politics and election
No employee will take part in politics being the member of institution.
No employees shall fight election on any platform.
Clause-4: Connection with radio, TV, or PRESS.
No employee shall play or conduct or participate in editing in any magazines, newspaper
and in radio, television and in press.
Clause-5: Criticism of the institute
No employee shall in any radio, TV, or any other public media criticize the institution in
any manner.
No employee shall should go in public criticizing the policies draft by the institution.
Suitable action will be taken against the person found in any activity related to this.
Clause-6: Gifts
No employee shall accept any gifts from anyone in the institution as it will be a considered
as a bribe.
Interpretation of the ‘trifling value’ shall be the same as laid by the government servants
conduct rules.
Clause-7: Private trade and practices
No employees shall do or indulge in any kind of trade practices in the intuition or by the
name of institution.
Any such practices will not be entertained by the institution.
Clause-8: Duties of the employees
Every employee is advised to fulfil his/her duties with full integrity and honesty.
Every employee is required to mark his attendance; without which it will be considered as
absent.
Except for valid reason no employee shall be absent on the working day of the institution.
It shall be duty of all the employees to follow the ‘Fundamental duties of Institution’.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 16
For more information, go to this link:
https://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/Code%20of%20Conduct%20rulesnn.PDF
BUILDING & WORKS COMMITTEE, NIT KURUKSHETRA
Building & Works Committee is the committee which comes under Estate Section. It consists of
Eight Member which is lead by Chairman and seven other members which includes
One person nominated by the Central Government (MHRD) below the rank of Director of
Deputy Secretary
One person nominated by the Board of Governors
Dean, Planning & Development
One expert from Civil Engineering Wing of the Central or State Government Or any
autonomous body of repute
Special Invitee
Member Secretary
This committee manages all the projects and other activities of the Institute and also responsible
for the entire work regarding the maintenance and renovation.
For further details, please check the link below:
https://nitkkr.ac.in/sub_courses.php?id=198&id4=129
2.1.1.4 Strategic plan (5)
The SWOT analysis of the Department is a depiction of the present scenario of the Department.
This strategic planning depicts strength, weakness, opportunity and threats. The Department till
now practiced strategic planning through institutional planning meetings and proceedings. In tune
with the requirements of NBA Quality Assurance, following SWOT analysis was conducted
recently to initiate strategic planning of the operations of the Department.
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Qualified & Dedicated Faculty. Shortage of
Adequate Regular
Faculty
Strategic tie-ups
with companies
Meet out the
global challenges
in the area of
Management
Students actively participating in
events.
Publishes papers in
Conferences/Journals
Actively participated in Institute
events like Techspardha,
Confluence, and Industry Summit
as well as cultural events.
Lack of labs
related to
specializations
Research
consultancy
Core focus on
specific
specializations
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 17
Department is extending
cooperation to Administration in
various capacities like DVC,
Industry Cell, IIMS Software
Implementation, Support to
Accounts Department etc.
Lack of Business
Communication
Lab
Corporate
Oriented design
of the curriculum
More competitive
environment
Various Labs approved for future
including Psychology lab and
Business Communincation lab
Brand Building
through
Strategic
collaboration
with NSE
Strategic tie ups
with industry
and NSE
Developmental Strategic Planning in future shall be done matching Strengths and Opportunities
which may lead to diversification and changes in streams of specialization of existing MBA
program.
Combination of weaknesses and threats may slowly degrade the operations of the Department both
qualitatively and quantitatively.
Students have been effectively participating in events such as Techspardha, Confluence, and
Industry Summit just as social occasions. The department has been extending cooperation to
Administration in different limits like DVC, Industry Cell, IIMS Software Implementation,
Support to Accounts Department and so on Brand building via strategic collaboration with NSE,
thus augmenting research work.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 18
Strategic plan (2021-2024)
Academic
Year
Major Actions and activities Duration
From To
2021-22 Joining of New faculty* June
2021
June
2022
2022-23 To introduce MBA program for Business Executives. June
2022
June
2023
2022-23 To offer customized programmes in various fields of
management education and MOU with companies for
assured placement and support.
June
2022
June
2023
To formulate specialized curriculum/courses as per the
industry requirements through Academia Industry Interface
June
2022
June
2023
2023-24 To emphasize on the research activities like consultancy
work with more industrial tie-ups and introduce EDP
(Entrepreneur Development Programs)
June
2023
June
2024
We as an institution have targeted to various Objectives for the upcoming academic years. In the
year 2019-20, we successfully recruited Permanent Faculties for our Department. The joining of
the faculty is subjected to decision from the pending court case.
We envisage introducing MBA program for Business Executive in the year 2022-23.
MOUs to be signed in the year 2022-23 with the various companies for assured placement and
support, henceforth customization in various fields of management education, thus to comprehend
courses as per the industrial requirements through academic.
Entrepreneur Developmental Programs will be introduced in the Year 2023-2024 to emphasize
entrepreneur developmental setting up incubator centre.
2.1.2. Faculty Empowerment (15)
2.1.2.1. Faculty development policies (5)
The Institution have a well-defined faculty development policy to ensure that faculty continues to
meet high standards
National/ International Activities in India
I.
(a)
Attending for Presentation of research papers in National & International Conferences/
Symposia/Seminar etc.
(b)
Visiting Institutes/ Universities/ Industries/ R& D Lab for Research interactions / Special
Training/Short Term Course/Workshop; Presentation of research project proposal etc.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 19
Activities allowed: Maximum of Three activities would be allowed in India in a financial year.
International Activities in Abroad
II.
(a)
Attending for Presentation of research papers /delivering invited or keynote lectures in
National & International Conferences/ Symposia
(b)
Visiting Institutes/ Universities for Research Interactions/ Special Training/Workshop
Activities allowed: Maximum of Two activities would be allowed (abroad) in a block of three
years.
Participation in National/International Activities (India/Abroad):
Form- A will be used for activities under I and II.
Processing of Application for activities under II(a) and II(b) (Abroad)
1. Scrutiny and observation report by Departmental committee
Application is to be submitted by the faculty on Form- A under activity II(a) to the
Department well in advance, at least one month in advance of the conference. The
complete processing of the application takes about three weeks. After receiving the
application, a three member Departmental Committee consisting of HOD/Coordinator of
concerned department/school, one faculty working in specific research area/relevant
research area and one professor as nominated by HOD/Coordinator (preferably from
specific research area/relevant research area, in case of availability) will scrutinize the
applications based on the following points
i. Quality of the contents of the paper to be presented.
ii. Relevance of the paper with the theme of the conference.
iii. The nature of paper: experimental/theoretical/review. (Note- Review paper will not
be considered).
iv. Acceptance of paper/abstract, and review report (if any) attached.
v. Quality of the event and its relevance with the focused research area of the faculty.
vi. Number of faculty members going abroad at a time from the Department.
vii. Whether the event falls during vacation/semester break/holidays when there is no
teaching work.
The committee must ensure the followings:
1. Participation is in a quality event and the event is on focussed research areas of
the faculty.
2. The participations in the event is beneficial to the Institute.
3. The examination/ result related work do not suffer.
The Departmental Committee will forward the application of the faculty (Form-A)
along with the observations of the committee in the prescribed. Form D (required for
international activity under II (a) only) within 5 working days of receiving the application
to DR(Accounts) for further processing.
2. Confirmation of availability of fund
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 20
The confirmation of availability of fund in the prevailing CPDA financial block
year will be given by DR(Accounts). The application should be cleared by the accounts
section and sent to the office of Dean (FW) preferably within two working days after
receiving it from the concerned department/school.
3. Scrutiny and Recommendation by the Institutional Committee
After confirmation of the fund availability and upon satisfaction with the quality of
the event and observations report of the departmental committee (Form-A and Form-D)
the faculty member would be called to present his/her research work before the institute
level committee comprising of the following:
1. Dean (FW)
2. Dean (R&C)
3. HOD/Co-ordinator of concerned Department/School
(In case of non-availability of any member, a person holding the charge will participate
the meeting.)
The quality and relevance of the paper, and the presentation will be ensured by the
Institutional Committee. The committee shall also ensure that the participation in the event
will be beneficial to the institute. Upon satisfaction, the committee would recommend the
application for the activity which will be forwarded for the approval of the Director by
Dean (FW).
For international activities under II(b), the application in Form-A, duly scrutinized
by the departmental committee on the points mentioned at 1(wherever appropriate) is
also to be submitted to the office of Dean(FW) through DR(Acct.). The faculty member
has to make a presentation before the Institutional Committee to discuss details of the
event and to justify how his/her visit will be beneficial to the institute. Upon satisfaction,
the Institutional Committee would recommend the application to the Director for approval.
(After receipt of application for the activities under II from the Accounts Section, the office
of Dean(FW) will complete the process and forward it to the Director for approval
preferably within 10 working days.)
Guidelines
Visits to National/ International Events:
1. Visits for International/National events will only be allowed during vacation period (i.e.
semester breaks, summer and winter breaks, holidays only). HODs/Coordinators should
ensure that examination/result related work do not suffer while forwarding the application
of a faculty during vacation period also.
2. The conference should be prestigious/quality (Tier I level) and organized by
university/research institution/societies/industries.
3. The conference should not be a predatory/questionable conference as listed on various
online resources.
4. The review report /acceptance of paper/abstract of the manuscript should be attached with
the application form.
5. In absence of acceptance letter of the paper/abstract, the application will not be considered.
6. Faculty will be allowed to attend conferences in their own research areas/ relevant
interdisciplinary areas.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 21
7. As the visits outside the institution (abroad and India) to be restricted to vacation period only,
there should not be any restriction in the number of faculty for participation in the events in
abroad/India. However, the HOD/Coordinator has to ensure that some faculty are retained
in the department for other academic/administrative work for smooth functioning of the
Department.
8. For the events (under I) if organized in the institute, there will be no vacation restriction for
the participation, but the faculty has to adjust the teaching work in order to avoid teaching
loss.
Total stay abroad during an activity visit under II(a):
a. Actual days of conference days and two additional days (one before and another after
the conference) plus the actual period of travel.
b. One/two extra days may be permitted under extraordinary circumstances only (like non-
availability of the Air India, its allied partner flights, etc.). However, prior approval from
competent authority is mandatory.
c. In normal circumstance, extension of stay abroad (in either side) will not be allowed. In
case, a faculty wants to stay abroad during holiday beyond the sanction limit, prior
permission from the Director is required. However, the Director may deny the
permission in case of exigencies.
Further, in case of over stay abroad, before/ or (and) after the conference period (with
prior approval of the Director), faculty will have to bear one way travel expenses. DA
will be provided as per above (point ‘a’ or ‘b’, whichever applicable) in addition to the
accommodation charge (as per rule) and registration fee on production of proof.
d. As per the GOI norms, the faculty has to travel by Air India/ its allied partner flights. In
case the travel is not made through the above said Airlines, the Air-fare will not be
reimbursed. However, DA (for the conference days plus two days only), accommodation
charge (as per rule) and the registration fee can be reimbursed only on production of
proof.
e. Suffix/prefix of Saturday/Sunday/Holidays with the duty will be dealt as per the
GOI/Institute rules. In any case, total stay abroad should not be more than the approved
one.
Total stay abroad during an activity visit under II(b):
A maximum of 10 days is allowed for the event under II (b) during summer/ winter
vacation/semester break and holidays only. A period of more than 10 days (maximum
of 4 weeks during summer holidays only) may be allowed but the reimbursement will
be limited for maximum of 10 days only. The remaining expenditure (i.e. more than 10
days) may be borne by the university/institute being visited / any external agency or by
the faculty.
Participation in International/National activities in India under I (a & b):
i) Attending training/short term courses/Workshop in an academic year (preferably one per
semester) during vacation/ break/holidays is allowed as long as the period does not exceed
the duration of vacation. However, for the presentation of research proposal there will be
no restriction of vacation/break/holidays.
ii) For the activities covered under I, faculty need to submit Form A furnishing details of the
event to the Department. After having a thorough examination, HOD/Coordinator will
forward the application to DR (Accounts) for confirmation of fund availability under
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 22
CPDA. Accounts clearance should be given preferably within two days and the
application to be forwarded to the office of Dean (FW).
iii) An application for an activity in India is expected to reach in the office of Dean (FW)
within a week from the day it is submitted in the department/school. The Dean (FW) will
further process for the approval of the Director.
Knowledge sharing & Report submission:
i. Faculty member attending a conference abroad under II(a) need to share his/her
experience/knowledge with fellow faculty members in the department/school and
submit a report of the activity carried out to office of Dean (FW)within a week of
arriving back in the institute.
ii. In case of activities abroad under II(b), faculty will have to share his/her experience in
the department through a presentation within a week of return in the institute. The
department may invite other faculty members and research students.
iii. HODs/Coordinators of schools are to make sure that the reports of the activities attended
(under II a & b) and/ departmental presentation certificate are submitted to the office of
Dean (FW). The presentation must be carried out in the department for the activities
under II(b) within 15 days of return.
Expenditure and Reimbursement:
i. Prior approval shall be taken for any expenditure under this grant.
ii. The faculty will be required to claim the reimbursement along with a copy of report of
participation of activity and/departmental presentation certificate (as the case may be)
within a month of return. Account section has to ensure of submission of the above
documents by the claimant before making the reimbursement.
iii. Payment mode for registration/ accommodation for an activity outside India can be cash
(in appropriate currency)/cheque/credit card/debit card/forex card/net banking/bank
transfer etc. and reimbursement will be made on actual payment basis. In case of
payment in currency other than Indian rupees, actual charges (which include
conversion/service charges) will be reimbursed but conversion needs to be made through
government approved agencies/government agencies/banks.
iv. Any expenditure incurred towards participation in the activity (under I & II) including
registration fees paid, shall not be reimbursable if the faculty fails to attend the activities
due to any reason.
In case of cancellation of visit abroad due to government directions/exigencies in the
institute, the institute will reimburse all expenses (including registration fee, ticket/ticket
cancellation fee /visa fee etc.) retaining the chance of attending one international
conference abroad in one financial year.
v. The amount sanctioned shall be sanctioned on reimbursable basis.
vi. Only one third of the amount sanctioned over a block period shall be made available
during the first year of the block period of 3 years. Any unutilised amount shall be rolled
over to the second year and the remaining amount sanctioned during the third year.
Amount set aside for each year of the block period shall not be paid in advance.
vii. Faculty need to make yearly procurement plan of activities to avoid last minute purchase
problems the expenditure to the tune of Rs.1 Lac per year should be planned.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 23
viii. Only regular faculty members who have cleared their probation shall be eligible for
international travel abroad under CPDA grant. The faculty who are on
deputation/QIP/leave beyond 30 days are not entitled for claiming reimbursement under
CPDA funds during their absence from the institute.
ix. The reimbursement made under CPDA shall be subject to audit.
Total number of International Travel will not exceed one in any financial year, supported by
any grant.
The funds utilized for activities I and II under List-A, will be maximum of 70% of total CPDA
(2.1 lacs) earmarked for individual faculty member for the three-year period.
The expenditure under CPDA on the activities under List-A& List-B is mandatory to be
recorded in the appropriate stock register after having physical verification of the items by the
store of the department/school, and is auditable. The faculty member will be responsible for all
audit clarification, if any.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 24
List - B
Procurement Activities under CPDA
1. Membership Fee of Professional Bodies/Societies (both National and International):
Maximum three in one block year.
2.
Contingent expenses:
B. Consumables such as chemicals, laboratory glassware, charges for synthesis and
analysis of samples for pursuing research.
B. Stationery, Books and related items; (Expenditure towards purchase of books shall
not exceed Rs.15000/- in a financial year).
C. Computer related consumables:
Inverter Battery on replacement basis (once in a three year block), UPS/ UPS
battery/Laptop battery (on replacement basis), Laptop adapter, Pen Drive, External
Hard Disk (not more than 1 each in a year); Printer Cartridge (one new cartridge in a
year only) /Refilling, Wi-Fi router & dongle; Wireless Presenter, Laser pointer, CD;
Keyboard & Mouse ( on replacement basis); Memory card; Up-gradation of computer
parts and/ replacement ( in case of failure) except mother board; replacement of mother
board requires certification of CCN duly approved by the HOD of concerned
department.
Any other item not listed above requires prior approval of the Director.
(Form ‘B’ &‘C’ are to be used for procurement activities under List-B which should be cleared
within 5 working days by the concerned department/school and accounts so as to reach to office
of Dean (FW) for further processing.)
The department has process of taking feedback from students regularly in a documented form.
That procedure has predefined criterion in which various elements of teaching are rated by the
students and in few open-ended questions they provide the feedback on improvement. This
feedback is then shred with the faculty of the institute and this is further utilized in denoting
certain areas of duty and appraisal by the institute.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 25
2.1.2.2. Decentralization, delegation of power and Collective decision making (10)
The department believes in the policy of participative management and decentralization. Emphasis
is made on including every faculty and staff member by involving them in various committees.
Powers and Roles of HOD and Other faculty members
Name &
Designation
Academic Financial Managerial &
Administrative
Remarks
related to
utilization
of powers &
evidence
files
Director Strategic
resources
approval
HOD Academic planning
and implementation
for the MBA
courses
Rs 25000/-
for
Departmental
Expenses
Rs 5 lac for a
single
purchase /
service order
etc.
*Sanctioning CL,
*Recommending
procurement etc.
Strategic
resources
planning,
leading
BOS, DRC,
DPC, DRC,
Chairman
MBA
Admission
Committee
Prof Rajender
Kumar
Mentor
Area Coordinator
(HRM)
Advising the
department on various
issues
BOS, DRC,
DAC, DPC
Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
Area Coordinator
(Marketing)
Students Advisor
BOS, DRC,
DAC, DPC
Dr. Mohd.
Firoz
Ensuring the
placement profile of
the students are up to
date, the matching of
student’s data with
company
requirement
Departmental
Budgeting decisions
- Contacting the
companies, approval
of slot and profile,
finalizing the details
on number of students
to be provided to a
company.
Preparation of the
Departmental budget
and controlling
BOS, PAC,
DPC
& Finances
Dr. Sathans,
Department of
To approve the
progress of the
scholars, to set
DRC-
Member
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 26
Electrical
Engineering
Dr. Gian
Bhushan,
Department of
Mechanical
Engineering
Dr. Ashutosh
Kumar Singh,
Department of
Computer
Application
norms on basic
selection criteria,
analysis of research
topic and its viability
The Placement Advisory Committee (PAC) is headed by Dr. Mohd. Firoz and the
activities of placement are managed by the students. This committee communicates with
the companies for the placement and internship and provide them the interaction/interview
slots.
Student’s Advisory Committee (SAC) is playing a very important role to advise the
Department for improvement in various areas like conducting quizzes and other activities
that are semi academic in nature, arranging the guest lectures and personality development
programs.
Roles and Responsibility of SAC
o Bridging the gap between faculty and student
o Ensuring the welfare of student
o Reporting a feedback every 4 weeks about the faculty, department, infrastructure
and various other classroom related matters.
o Making arrangements for Personality Development workshop for the correct
grooming of the students
o Arranging guest lectures.
o Working to maintain harmonious relations with the alumni of the department.
o Arranging the alumni meet.
The Head of the Department takes feedback from the SAC and PAC on regular intervals.
The system of empowering the students with this much authority has kept them on toes. This
culture of the department prepares them well for the active corporate work outside and also at the
same time keeps the students motivated. Sharing of responsibility and delegation of authority has
made the student feel their importance to the department. The passed-out students of the
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 27
department always feels connected to the name NITian and has an alumni association in which
they have always helped out their junior students.
Roles and Responsibility of PAC
o Managing the student’s data for placement and internship purpose
o Maintaining and updating the data of the company for contacting them
o Contacting the companies and inviting them for placement
o Ensuring the slot availability while inviting the company
o Ensuring the requirements of the company on campus is fulfilled like stay, food,
lab for conducting online test, GD rooms and interview rooms.
Departmental Advisory Committee Composition
1. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik In Chair
2. Prof. Rajender Kumar Member
3. Dr. Mohd. Firoz Member
Responsibilities:
As per the Senate Item 18.4: To consider and decide the amendments to the role of BOS,
DRC and DAC:
The Senate approved the role of DAC, DRC and BOS with minor amendments as under.
a) Constitution and functions of Departmental Advisory Committee (DAC)
The composition of DAC may be as under,
1. Head of the Department.
2. All Professor of the Department.
3. Two Associate Professors and two Assistant Professors in order of sonority by
rotation for 2year.
The Head of the Department shall constitute the DAC and approved by the Director.
2.1.3. Effective Governance Indicators (20)
2.1.3.1. Grievance Redressal mechanism (5)
(Specify the mechanism and composition of grievance redressal cell including Anti Ragging
Committee & Sexual Harassment Committee.)
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 28
Grievances handling Policies in NIT KURUKSHETRA
Grievance Handling Between Students
If you become the subject of a grievance, make sure to familiarize yourself with how the process
works at your institution. This section provides some general advice for setting up a strong defence
but should be done within the context of the policies of the institution.
Grievance Handling Between Student and Teacher
The best defence against a grievance is a well-designed syllabus with clearly-stated policies. When
well-designed, the syllabus provides a quasi-contractual agreement that outlines the course content
as well as the instructor’s expectations for student conduct and method of grading.
PROCEDURE FOR COMPLAINT: -
Complaint must be made by the victim or witness in writing.
Oral Complaints are to be lodged in person or by person accompanying the victim before
the Chairperson or to any member of the Committee.
All complaint must be addressed to the chairperson of the committee.
Complaint must be filled in a proper hierarchy.
The following committee is constructed to handle the concerned matter.
1. Dr. Rajender Kumar,
Professor, Department of Business Administration
Chairman
2. Dr. Vikas Chaudhary
Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
Member
3. Dr. (Ms.) Ratna Dahiya
Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering
Member
4. Dr. Mohd. Firoz, Assistant Professor, Business Admn. Deptt. Member
For Details, below is the link:-
https://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/grievance.pdf
Policies to prevent Sexual Harassment in NIT, Kurukshetra
It shall be duty of the employer or other responsible person in workplace or institution to prevent
or deter sexual harassment in the institution and provide the procedure for resolution, settlements,
prosecution of the acts of sexual harassment and provide all concerned steps to resolve it.
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 29
Procedure for complaint-
Complaint must be made by the victim in writing.
Oral Complaints are to be lodged in person or by person accompanying the victim before
the Chairperson or to any member of the Committee.
All complaint must be addressed to the chairperson of the committee.
Complaint must be filled in a proper hierarchy.
The following committee is constructed to handle the concerned matter
1. Dr. Ratan Dahiya
Professor,
Electrical Engineering Department
Chairperson & Presiding officer
2. Dr. Ajai Jain
Professor, Mechanical Engineering
Member
3. Dr. Pratibha Aggarwal
Professor, Civil Engineering
Member
4. Sh. GR Samantaray
Dy. Ragistrar (GA & Legal)
Member
5. Dr. Vandana Dave
Research Officer, Women Studies
& Research Centre, KUK
Member
6. Ms. Madhu Bala
Stenographer SG-II
Office of Dean (Academic)
Member
For more information, go to this link:
https://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/SEXUAL%20HARASMENT%20RULES.pdf
2.1.3.2. Transparency (5)
The Institute firmly belief in transparency, the system rules and policies are drafted to promote
equality. In order to promote transparency, the Institute has ensured that every rule and policy
related to all aspects of a student life is available to the reach of each student and stakeholders. To
ensure the reach of the stakeholders to the policies and important rules the availability of same is
on multiple platforms. The first platform on which the availability is for the general public and all
related stakeholders is the Institute website. The second platform where all rules and policies are
available in the hardbound form is the department office and the administration building of the
institute. Other than that, in case the students are unaware of any policy related matter existence
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 30
to anything, the same can be asked about by any faculty or mentor in the department itself which
can guide them to the places where they can find all required information.
2.1.3.3. Leader and Faculty selection process (5)
Recruitment Rules and Policies
The recruitment facility of NIT Kurukshetra is very fair, liberal and according to the government
norms and policies. The recruitment rules may be called the NIT faculty recruitment rules, 2011.
Eligibility criteria http://nitkkr.ac.in/docs/Advertisement%20No.%2021.2017.pdf
NIT Kurukshetra follows the Procedure given by Central Government for selection of faculty. The
details are given on
https://nitkkr.ac.in/sub_courses.php?id=489&id4=322
2.1.3.4. Stability of the academic leaders (5)
The policies and processes that have been formulated by the director of the Institute have guided
the institute in to new paths towards success. The institute has been able to grow multifold under
his guidance and has achieved new heights. The institute has always been blessed with the stability
of policies and vision of the mentors as the term for which the last three directors have served the
institute has been a stable of 5 years.
The Department has been headed by two heads during the last three years one of which is Dr.
Rajender Kumar. He has been a part of the institute for decades and currently serving the institute
as Dean (Student’s welfare). The current Head of the Department Dr. Rajender Kumar has joined
the institute in September 1984 and has become the Head of the Department for the third term in
September 2021. He is a Professor in the Department and is a stable part of the system.
2.2. Financial Resources (40)
2.2.1. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (40)
Summary of current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred (for the
institution exclusively) in the three previous financial years.
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3
CFY: Current Financial Year, CFYm1 (Current Financial Year minus 1), CFYm2 (Current
Financial Year minus 2) and CFYm3 (Current Financial Year minus 3
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 31
Table no. 2.2.1 a - Total Income at Institute level For FY 2017-18
Income
Total Income
Fee Received Grant received
from
Govt.(Including
Plan Grant of Rs.
75.64 Crore)
Grant received
from Industry
Other Sources
(specify)
(Interest, IDF
Cons, Prior
Period income
etc)
30,39,13,467 1,52,29,00,000 NIL 20,48,89,085 2,03,17,02,552
Table no. 2.2.1 a - Total Income at Institute level For FY 2018-19
Income
Total Income
Fee Received Grant received
from Govt.
.(Including Plan
Grant of Rs. 15.42
Crore)
Grant received
from Industry
Other Sources
(specify)
30,02,73,189 1,31,11,44,198 NIL 17,30,70,868 1,78,44,88,255
Table no. 2.2.1 a - Total Income at Institute level For FY 2019-20
Income
Fee Received Grant received
from Govt.
.(Including Plan
Grant of Rs. 13.50
Crore)
Grant received
from Industry
Other Sources
(specify)
Total Income
31,03,22,171 1,31,75,33,000 - 25,04,26,000 1,87,82,81,171
Table no. 2.2.1 a - Total Income at Institute level For CFY 2020-21
Income
Fee Received Grant received
from Govt.
.(Including Plan
Grant of Rs. 5.20
Crore)
Grant received
from Industry
Other Sources
(specify)
Total Income
26,89,55,000 1,03,63,25,000 - 36,71,62,000 1,67,24,42,000
Department of Business Administration [Type text] Page 32
2.2.1.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (15)
The Department has been allocated the adequate budget in all the years and the utilization
percentage are being summarize below.
Table 2.2.1.b Summary of Budget and the actual expenditure incurred in lacs
Items Budgeted
in CFY
Budgeted
in
CFYm1
Actual
exp in
CFYm1
Budgeted
in
CFYm2
Actual
exp in
CFYm2
Budgeted
in
CFYm3
Actual
exp in
CFYm3
2020-21 2019-20 2019-20 2018-19 2018-19 2017-18 2017-18
Infrastructure Built up 8.00 4.50 4.13 15.00 15.55 5.00 5.27
Library (Centrally allocated) - - - - - - -
Computer Labs & software 12.00 5.00 3.98 27.00 28.41 6.00 4.93
Teaching & non-Teaching
Salary 125.00 110.00 91.00 110.00 91.37 110.00 91.67
Research 25.00 20.00 1.18 15.00 13.82 6.00 4.07
Training & Travel 0.80 1.60 1.59 2.00 1.58 1.50 1.23
Placement Activities 0.30 0.40 0.25 0.50 0.40 0.50 0.11
Entrepreneurship (Centrally
allocated) - - - - - - -
Co-curricular (Centrally
allocated) - - - - - - -
Extra- Curricular (Centrally
allocated) - - - - - - -
Alumni relations (Centrally
allocated) - - - - - - -
Miscellaneous Exp. 0.5 1 0.42 1.5 1.34 1.5 2.14
Others 0.4 1 0.5 1.5 1.26 1.5 1.02
Total 172 143.5 103.05 172.5 153.73 132 110.44
The utilization percentage in the year:
2019-20: 71.80%
2018-19: 89.12%
2017-18: 83.67%
2.2.1.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15)
The detailed utilization of the Head wise expenditure are being given in above para.
2.2.1.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (10)
Link: https://nitkkr.ac.in/sub_courses.php?id=487&id4=320
Department of Business Administration Page 33
CRITERION 3 : PROGRAM OUTCOMES & COURSE OUTCOMES (100)
3.1. Attainment of Program Outcomes (50)
A management postgraduate program shall be able to
PO-1: Apply knowledge of management theories and practices to solve business problems.
PO-2: Foster Analytical and critical thinking abilities for data-based decision making
PO-3: Ability to develop Value based Leadership ability
PO-4: Ability to understand, analyze and communicate global, economic, legal, and ethical
aspects of business
PO-5: Ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational goals,
contributing effectively to a team environment
3.1.1. Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which the
evaluation of Program Outcome is based (15)
The department employs a number of direct and indirect assessment techniques to assess the
attainment of programme outcome and course outcome.
Assessment Tools (AT)/
Process
Programme Outcomes (PO)
PO-1 PO-2 PO-3 PO-4 PO-5
Direct
Assessment
Tools
AT-1 Mid-term evaluation √ √ √ √ √
AT-2 End-term evaluation √ √ √ √ √
AT-3 Class work evaluation/
Quiz/Assignment
√ √ √ √ √
Indirect
Assessment
Tools
AT-4 Employer Survey √ √ √ √ √
AT-5 Alumni Survey √ √ √ √ √
AT-6 Student Survey √ √ √ √ √
Direct Assessment (A) = Average CO Attainment (%) / PO Attainment/Expected PO Level
Indirect Assessment (B) is evaluated on the basis of surveys conducted through Employer
Survey, Alumni Survey and Student Feedback.
The Total Attainment is computed using the formula:
Total Attainment = 0.9*A + 0.1*B
Department of Business Administration Page 34
Description of various assessment tools given above are as follows:
AT-1 Mid-term evaluation: Mid-term evaluation is carried out throughout mid term
tests at equal intervals in each semester. The test are evaluated after each conduct and
results are communicated to and discussed with students.
AT-2 End-term evaluation: End-term evaluation is carried out at the end of the
semester. The answer sheets are evaluated after the exam and results are communicated
to the students.
AT-3 Class work evaluation/ Quiz/Assignment: Class-performance evaluation of
students is carried out at continual basis throughout the semester. Performance
assessment of students through quiz/assignment is carried out at regular intervals during
the semester.
AT-4 Employer Survey: Survey about the course contents and programme outcome is
taken from the employers who visited the campus for the placement drive purpose.
AT-5 Alumni Survey: Survey about the course contents and programme outcome is
taken from the alumnus of the Institute.
AT-6 Student Survey: Students feedback is taken compulsorily at the end of each
semester.
The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out:
AT-1: Twice in a semester
AT-2: Once in a semester
AT-3: During entire semester
AT-4: Once in an academic year
AT-5: Once in an academic year
AT-6: Once in each semester
Direct assessment scheme for each course is as follows.
Mid-term1 - 15 marks
Mid-term 2 - 15 marks
Class participation – 10 marks
Attendance - 10 marks
End term - 50 marks
For seminar and dissertation, the assessment is done on hundred marks. For Computer
Application in Management (CAM) the assessment scheme is as follows.
Mid-term1 - 15 marks
Mid-term 2 - 15 marks
Class participation - 20 marks
Attendance - 10 marks
End term - 40 marks
The class participation mark is decided based on the various activities conducted by the
faculties such as quiz, role play, games, assignments, presentation etc.
Department of Business Administration Page 35
The class participation marks are solely decided by the teacher or the person in charge on the
basis of different activities like presentation, quiz, class tests, games etc.
The project work and dissertation.
The project work and dissertation are a part of the curriculum. The evaluation of the project
work and dissertation is done based on multiple parameters targeted towards assessment of
attainment of indirect programme outcome. Project work and dissertation are of 100 marks.
Sr. No Semester Internal assessment End term examination Total
Marks
Credit
1 Semester1 410 390 800 27.5
2 Semester2 400 400 800 28
3 Semester3 400 500 900 32
4 Semester4 350 450 800 30.5
Total 118
Department of Business Administration Page 36
3.1.2. POs attainment level (35)
For most of the courses the weightage of internal assessment is 50 percent and the weight for external assessment is also 50 percent.
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
First Semester
Apply
knowled
ge of
manage
ment
theories
and
practice
s to
solve
business
problem
s
Foster
Analyti
cal and
critical
thinkin
g
abilities
for
data-
based
decisio
n
making
Ability
to
develop
Value
based
Leaders
hip
ability
Ability to
understan
d, analyze
and
communi
cate
global,
economic
, legal,
and
ethical
aspects of
business
Ability to
lead
themselve
s and
others in
the
achievem
ent of
organizati
onal
goals,
contributi
ng
effectivel
y to a
team
environm
ent
Principles and
Practices of
Management
CO-
101
Demonstrate the ability to extend the reflection
about basic management concepts and principles. 3 2 2 3
Principles and
Practices of
Management
CO-
102
Enable the students to connect management
theories to the realistic business set-up. 3 2 2 3
Principles and
Practices of
Management
CO-
103
To widen practical skills of judgment making and
leadership. 2 3 2 3
Department of Business Administration Page 37
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Organisational
Behaviour
CO-
201
Basic knowledge of individual and group behaviour
as a distinct field in management with an emphasis
on practical application.
2 3 2
Organisational
Behaviour
CO-
202
Enhancement in the students’ understanding of
one’s own behaviour and its impact on others will
enhance the personal & interpersonal skills of the
students.
2 3 3
Organisational
Behaviour
CO-
203
Meaningful insight to diagnose and effectively deal
with human behaviour at the workplace. 2 3 2 3
Managerial Economics CO-
301
Understand theories related to managerial
economics and role of manager in firms. 3 3 2 2 2
Managerial Economics CO-
302
Design competition strategies, including costing,
pricing, product differentiation, and market
environment.
3 3 3 3 2
Managerial Economics CO-
303
Analyze real business problems and able to take
business decisions judicially. 3 3 3 3 2
Accounting For
Managers
CO-
401
Identify the basic principles of accounting and
ability to read, interpret and analyse the financial
statement
3 3 2 3 3
Accounting For
Managers
CO-
402
Predict the cost behaviours and their application in
short term, long-term decision-making, budgetary
planning and controlling.
3 3 2 2 2
Accounting For
Managers
CO-
403
Develop an awareness of the need to consider
ethical, social and other relevant issues, in addition
to financial information, in management decision-
making process.
2 3 1 1 2
Business Environment CO-
501
To understand and analyze global, economic, legal
aspects of business environment and the conception
of business working.
3 2 2 3 2
Department of Business Administration Page 38
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Business Environment CO-
502
The students are expected to understand the SWOT
analysis of business and about fiscal market
functioning.
2 3 3 2
Business Environment CO-
503
The learning about the economic and non-economic
aspects related to business will also be acquired by
the students.
2 2 1 3 3
Soft Skills
Development
CO-
601
To provide the student the understanding of the
power of a good communication in today’s
corporate world.
3 3 2
Soft Skills
Development
CO-
602
To empower the student with a strong and
confident personality that will help portray a strong
character.
2 3 2 2
Soft Skills
Development
CO-
603
To shape careers of student in the long run and
provide them with the ethical conduct of
communication.
2 1 2 2
Business Statistics CO-
701
Identify statistical tools needed to solve various
business problems. 3 2
Business Statistics CO-
702
Apply various probability distributions to various
business problems. 3 2
Business Statistics CO-
703
Develop Analytical and critical thinking abilities
for data-based decision making 2 3
Computer
Applications In
Management
CO-
801
Will have a better understanding of various
statistical packages and their usage 3
Computer
Applications In
Management
CO-
802
Ability to understand the data and its analysis
aiding to decision making 3
Computer
Applications In
Management
CO-
803
Ability to work on the practical office problems
2 3 2
Department of Business Administration Page 39
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Second Sem
Financial Management CO-
901
Demonstrate an understanding of the overall role
and importance of the finance function. 1 1 1 1 1
Financial Management CO-
902
Understanding of various short/long term sources
and application of fund including their
measurement and appraisal techniques.
3 3 1 3 2
Financial Management CO-
903
Develop an awareness of the recent methodologies
for creating stakeholders value considering the
various corporate actions.
3 3 2 3 3
Human Resource
Management
CO-
1001
Develop a comprehensive knowledge of issues
affecting the employer-employee relationship. 2 3
Human Resource
Management
CO-
1002
Able to understand appropriate organizational
HRM practices and be familiar with each element’s
key concepts and terminology. 3
Human Resource
Management
CO-
1003
Capable to apply the principles and techniques of
human resource management gained through this
course to the discussion of major personnel issues 3 2 3
Production and
Operations
Management
CO-
1101
Understand the elements of operations management
and various transformation processes to enhance
productivity and competitiveness
3
Production and
Operations
Management
CO-
1102
Be able to understand the characteristics of
different types of decision-making environments
and the appropriate decision making approaches
3
Production and
Operations
Management
CO-
1103
Be able to build and solve Linear Programming
Problems, Transportation Models and Assignment
Models.
3
Marketing
Management
CO-
1201
Comprehensive and practical introduction to
marketing management. 3 2 1 2
Department of Business Administration Page 40
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Marketing
Management
CO-
1202
Improved ability to make effective marketing
decisions, including assessing marketing
opportunities and developing marketing strategies
and implementation plans.
3 1 2 1 2
Marketing
Management
CO-
1203
Students gain significant experience in
communicating and defending their marketing
recommendations.
3 2 2 2
Total Quality
Management
CO-
1301
Understand the essential principles of Total Quality
Management and select suitable statistical
techniques for getting better processes
2 3 2 2 2
Total Quality
Management
CO-
1302
Help students to write reports to management
telling processes and advocating ways to look up
them.
3 2
Total Quality
Management
CO-
1303
Ability to operate the methodologies, methods and
tools of Lean Manufacturing. 2 3 3
Business Ethics CO-
1401
Define, explain and illustrate the theoretical
foundations of business ethics. 3 2 3 3 2
Business Ethics CO-
1402
Re-examine their knowledge of business and
economic concepts from an ethical perspective. 3 2 3 3 2
Business Ethics CO-
1403
Apply and illustrate ethical and moral issues in
business decision making process. 3 3 3 2 2
Research
Methodology
CO-
1501
Develop understanding on research process, various
kinds of research and research designs 3
Research
Methodology
CO-
1502
Basic understanding of data analysis and hypothesis
testing procedures 3
Research
Methodology
CO-
1503
Adequate knowledge on measurement & scaling
techniques as well as the quantitative data analysis 3 3
Management
Information System
CO-
1601
Understand the leadership role of Management
Information Systems in achieving business 2 3
Department of Business Administration Page 41
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
competitive advantage through informed decision
making.
Management
Information System
CO-
1602
Analyze and synthesize business information and
systems to facilitate evaluation of strategic
alternatives.
2
Management
Information System
CO-
1603
Ability to design Information Systems for various
functional areas of management 3 3 1
Compulsory
Subejects
International Business CO-
1701
Learning and understanding of how business is
conducted in the international arena. 3 2 2 1
International Business CO-
1702
Gaining managerial skills that are used to meet the
challenges faced in the global workplace. 3 2 1 2
International Business CO-
1703
In depth understanding of economic institution and
economic integration 2 1 2 2
Business Law &
Corporate Taxation
CO-
1801
Demonstrate an understanding of the Legal
Environment of Business. 3 3
Business Law &
Corporate Taxation
CO-
1802
To understand various aspects and dynamics of
legislation that affects any business. 2 1 3 1
Business Law &
Corporate Taxation
CO-
1803
To understand the role of case law in statutory and
regulatory interpretation in the business law area. 2 1 3 1
Entrepreneurship
Development
CO-
1901
Define, identify and apply the principles related to
entrepreneurial theories. 3 2 2 3 2
Entrepreneurship
Development
CO-
1902
Able to understand for preparing a startup business
plan emphasizing role of various financing
agencies, marketing, and technology development.
2 2 3 3 2
Entrepreneurship
Development
CO-
1903
Inculcate entrepreneurial spirit to start new business
plan. 2 2 2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 42
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Strategic Management CO-
2001
The students will effectively communicate the
change management strategies in various forums to
an array of audiences with accuracy, clarity,
specificity and professionalism
2 2 3
Strategic Management CO-
2002
To provide the students the understanding of the
facts for advertising on digital media 2 3 2
Strategic Management CO-
2003
To teach the different aspects and approaches of
various digital media vehicles and social media
platforms
2 2 3
Digital Marketing &
E-Commerce
CO-
2101
To provide the students the understanding of the
facts for advertising on digital media 2
Digital Marketing &
E-Commerce
CO-
2102
To teach the different aspects and approaches of
various digital media vehicles and social media
platforms
2 2
Digital Marketing &
E-Commerce
CO-
2103
To empower them with the future of business in
digital world and the eminence presence of it which
is growing rapidly and they will be able to match
up to the speed.
2 2 2 2
HRM Subejects
Labour Laws CO-
2201
Students will be aware of the employer’s
obligations under the statutes and
employee/workers rights under the Acts.
2 2 2 3 3
Labour Laws CO-
2202
To students will know the powers of the
government/authorities under the Act and the
consequences of non-compliance of the statutes.
3 3 3 3 3
Labour Laws CO-
2203
Develop understanding of the fundamental
principles and how they apply to certain legal
problems will certainly enable students in avoiding
conflict with labour.
2 1 2 3 3
Department of Business Administration Page 43
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Organizational Change
and Development
CO-
2301
To explain organizational change processes and
learn approaches and strategies for managing
organizational change.
2 2 2 3
Organizational Change
and Development
CO-
2302
To recognize an improvement in their ability to
synthesize, articulate, and disseminate information 3 3 2 3
Organizational Change
and Development
CO-
2303
To impart knowledge concerning organizational
change to others through dialogue and critique. 3 2
Management Training
and Development
CO-
2401
Students will be able to understand the importance
of training and development for organization as
well as for employees.
3 2 2 2 3
Management Training
and Development
CO-
2402
To understand the need, importance of evaluation
of training and management development. 2 3 1 3 3
Management Training
and Development
CO-
2403
The students will also be aware about the
contemporary approaches and issues in training and
development.
2 2 2 3 3
Counseling Skills for
Managers
CO-
2501
The students will be conversant with counseling
concept, goals and its process. 3 1 3 2
Counseling Skills for
Managers
CO-
2502
The students will be able to understand and apply
counseling skill and advanced counseling skills to
solve the business problems.
2 2 3 2 3
Counseling Skills for
Managers
CO-
2503
The students will be well versed with the
performance counseling and different counseling
therapies.
2 2 2 2 3
Performance
Management
CO-
2601
Design an organization’s performance management
process that is compliant with law and supports
organizational mission and strategy.
3 2 3
Performance
Management
CO-
2602
To evaluate and distinguish a variety of
organizational performance management programs
and most excellent practices
3 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 44
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Performance
Management
CO-
2603
Employ job-related performance standards and
performance indicators that reflect the employee’s
range of responsibilities
2 3 3 2 3
Human Resource
Development:
Strategies and Systems
CO-
2701
To give the understanding and professional
competence in the areas, like facts for the
assumption and practice of HR knowledge and
skills
3 2 3 2 3
Human Resource
Development:
Strategies and Systems
CO-
2702
To significantly appraise existing paradigms and
practice in HRD 3
Human Resource
Development:
Strategies and Systems
CO-
2703
To examine current HRD programmes and their
theoretical underpinnings 2 2 2
Dynamics of Industrial
Relations
CO-
2801
The students will be familiar with concept,
evaluation and scope of Industrial relation. 3 2 2 3 2
Dynamics of Industrial
Relations
CO-
2802
The students will be able to get knowledge about
collective bargaining, settlement machinery and
ways of grievance handling as well as industrial
peace.
2 3 3 2
Dynamics of Industrial
Relations
CO-
2803
The students will know about recent trends in trade
union movement in India and workers’
participation in management also.
2 2 1 3 3
Interpersonal & Group
Dynamics
CO-
2901
To have the conceptual as well a practical
knowledge of group dynamics. 2 3 3
Interpersonal & Group
Dynamics
CO-
2902
This paper will help the students to improve their
interpersonal behavior and help them to practice the
techniques of group decision-making.
2 2 2 2 2
Interpersonal & Group
Dynamics
CO-
2903
Students will know how to develop a group, group
socialization process and issue related to group
conflict.
2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 45
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Compensation
Management
CO-
3001
The students will be able to demonstrate knowledge
in various components of total compensation, the
methods and aims of different forms of payment
systems.
2 3 2
Compensation
Management
CO-
3002
Students will develop an understanding of the
issues in designing the reward systems and
establishing different pay rates.
2 2 2
Compensation
Management
CO-
3003
They will come to know about the employers’
obligations under labor statutes governing wage
and salary administration. Learn some of the
implications for strategic compensation and
possible employer approaches to managing legally
required benefits.
2 3 2
Cross Cultural
Management
CO-
3101
Identify and analyse human resource concerns for
making successful results in the contemporary
business situation
2 2 2 2
Cross Cultural
Management
CO-
3102
To think tactically and recognize the fundamentals
of business and organizations in order to administer
change more efficiently in the global business
environment.
3 2 3 2
Cross Cultural
Management
CO-
3103
Learn the relevant core features of human resource
management in an worldwide context and to
expand capability to outline explanations to
multifaceted business problems.
3 3 2
Finance
Subejects
Financial Institution &
Markets
CO-
3201
Demonstrate an understanding of the overall
functions of financial markets and intermediary
institutions.
1 2 1 2 1
Department of Business Administration Page 46
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Financial Institution &
Markets
CO-
3202
Evaluate the economic environment and the impact
of governmental economic policies on consumers
and financial institutions.
3 3 1 2 2
Financial Institution &
Markets
CO-
3203
Describe the impact that non-banking financial
institutions and mutual fund has had on the
structure of the financial firms/industry.
2 2 2 2 1
Merchant Banking &
Financial Services
CO-
3301
Demonstrate the financial system and the legal &
regulatory framework. 3 2 1 2 2
Merchant Banking &
Financial Services
CO-
3302
Understand the functioning of Merchant Bankers
related to Issue Management Process, Merger &
Acquisitions and Business Valuations.
3 3 2 2 2
Merchant Banking &
Financial Services
CO-
3303
Understand the various financial services and their
suitability in attaining the organization objective. 1 2 1 3 1
Security Analysis &
Portfolio Management
CO-
3401
Understanding of Investments, impacting factors
and their evaluation including empirical
applications of asset pricing models.
3 2 1 3 2
Security Analysis &
Portfolio Management
CO-
3402
Analyse and evaluate the financial securities using
the fundamental and technical analysis. 3 3 2 2 3
Security Analysis &
Portfolio Management
CO-
3403
Build a diversified portfolio and assess portfolio
performance. 1 2 2 2 2
Insurance and Risk
Management
CO-
3501
Demonstrate the risk management needs and
insurance contract features 3 1 1 2 2
Insurance and Risk
Management
CO-
3502
Demonstrate knowledge of insurance contracts and
provisions, and the features of personal &
commercial insurance, life and health insurance,
and various general insurance plans
3 1 1 3 2
Insurance and Risk
Management
CO-
3503
Develop the analytical skills necessary to make
optimal decisions relatively to insurance products
and alternative strategies and also to Demonstrate
2 3 2 1 3
Department of Business Administration Page 47
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
knowledge of the operation and management of
insurance entities
Project Finance CO-
3601
Develop an understanding of project management
and related factors including decision making. 3 3 2 2 3
Project Finance CO-
3602
Evaluate economic and financial cash flows models
to analyze project risk. 3 3 3 2 3
Project Finance CO-
3603
Develop the appropriate financial structure for a
project and determine a project finance
arrangement that meets organization needs.
3 3 1 1 1
International Financial
Managment
CO-
3701
Understand international capital and foreign
exchange market, identify risk relating to exchange
rate fluctuations and develop hedging strategies to
deal with them.
3 3 2 3 3
International Financial
Managment
CO-
3702
Identify and appraise investment opportunities in
the international environment and the management
of international taxation.
3 3 3 3 2
International Financial
Managment
CO-
3703
Manage the multinational firm’s cash & receivables
management and their short term financing
avenues.
3 3 3 1 2
Working Capital
Management
CO-
3801
Evaluate the comparative working capital
management policies and their impact on the firm's
profitability and liquidity.
3 2 1 2 3
Working Capital
Management
CO-
3802
Evaluate the effective receivables, inventory and
cash management and its role in meeting the firm's
strategic objectives.
3 3 2 1 3
Working Capital
Management
CO-
3803
Evaluate short term sources of working capital and
manage the payables of the company 2 2 2 3 2
Derivatives
Management
CO-
3901
Provide a detailed explanation of hedging financial
instruments such as options, futures, swaps and
other derivative securities and describe the
2 2 2 3 2
Department of Business Administration Page 48
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
economic environment in which such instruments
operate
Derivatives
Management
CO-
3902
Develop and employ theoretical valuation methods
to price these hedging financial instruments. 2 2 1 2 2
Derivatives
Management
CO-
3903
Apply these instruments in managing the risk of
investing and hedging activity at the individual and
the corporate level.
1 2 1 2 2
Microfinance CO-
4001
Understand the concept of microfinance, models
and their applications in national and international
context.
2 1 3 2 3
Microfinance CO-
4002
Providing knowledge of major initiatives taken by
the government in the area of microfinance 3 1 2 1 3
Microfinance CO-
4003
Developing the understanding of the legal and
regulatory framework of the microfinance industry
and their performance measuring models.
1 3 3 3 3
Commercial Bank
Management
CO-
4101
Evaluate the role of banking in the economy, their
structure, and the regulatory environment in which
they operate
2 2 1 1 1
Commercial Bank
Management
CO-
4102
Demonstrate the analytical foundations related to
the asset-liability management (ALM) of Banks,
the risks involved, and the impact on the valuation
1 3 1 2 2
Commercial Bank
Management
CO-
4103
Evaluate the management of the lending,
investment and trading activities, the related risks
and the management of these risks
3 1 1 1 3
Marketing
Subejects
Integrated Marketing
Communication
CO-
4201
To teach the art of ad making for an analysed
business product and situations, so that they can
reach a creative and logical solution.
3
Department of Business Administration Page 49
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Integrated Marketing
Communication
CO-
4202
To provide them with the ethical and social values
related to advertising as it is a weapon of mass
influence.
3 3 3 1
Integrated Marketing
Communication
CO-
4203
To make the student evaluate advertisement
effectiveness and take the budgetory decisions 2 2 2
Sales & Distribution
Management
CO-
4301
To make the students adapt the art of selling an
ethical product in a competitive market. 3 3
Sales & Distribution
Management
CO-
4302
To develop a sales team and motivate them to
achieve organizational goal 3 3
Sales & Distribution
Management
CO-
4303
To make them to learn the managerial skill of
implementation of quota and territory designing as
well as channel distribution decisions
3 2
Product & Brand
Management
CO-
4401
Aims to synchronize product and brand
management processes. 3
Product & Brand
Management
CO-
4402
Better understanding of building and maintaining
strong and powerful brands, one of the most
valuable assets a company can have today.
3 2 2
Product & Brand
Management
CO-
4403
Understanding of relevant skills and abilities
needed to have competitive advantage within the
corporate world.
2 2 1
Consumer Behaviour CO-
4501
Understanding of the behavior of the buyer in the
marketplace. 3 1 1 2 1
Consumer Behaviour CO-
4502
Gaining holistic view of the buyer, which will help
in achieving knowledge of various models 3 1 2 2 3
Consumer Behaviour CO-
4503
Framework in understanding buyer’s behavior and
align the knowledge with formulation of
appropriate marketing strategies.
3 2 3 2 3
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-I
CO-
4601
Enable students to gain knowledge on rural
marketing, challenges and prospects for improving
rural marketing environment.
3 2 2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 50
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-I
CO-
4602
Understand how marketing ties into political
initiatives as expressed by citizens, advertisers, and
politicians.
3 2 2 2 2
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-I
CO-
4603
Help students to learn industrial marketing and
contemporary marketing techniques. 3 2 2 1 2
Retail Management CO-
4701
To empower the students with an understanding of
the operations of retail outlets 2 2 2
Retail Management CO-
4702
To make the students learn how creativity in
retailing is used for sales 2 2
Retail Management CO-
4703
To let them know about social viability of the
business and how to design a retail outlet to control
the business better and offer more in less space.
1 2 2
Relationship
Marketing
CO-
4801
Analysing relationship theory and relationship
economics from the point of view of the customer
and the organisation.
3 3 2 2
Relationship
Marketing
CO-
4802
Exploring an organisation's relational strategies
with different stakeholder groups. 2 2 1 2
Relationship
Marketing
CO-
4803
Knowledge to formulate and assess strategic,
operational and tactical CRM decisions as well. 2 2 1 2
Marketing of Services CO-
4901
Basic knowledge of marketing issues associated
with service gaps, perceived quality, customer
satisfaction and loyalty
3 2 2 1 2
Marketing of Services CO-
4902
Apply relevant services marketing theory, research
and analysis skills to contemporary case studies and
communicate outcomes employing professional
discourse and formats.
3 2 2 1 2
Marketing of Services CO-
4903
Conduct an investigation of service delivery
systems, collecting, analyzing data, and
synthesizing information to provide valid
conclusions.
2 2 2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 51
Subject Code Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Supply Chain
Management
CO-
5001
Ability to examine the design and performance of
supply networks and processes in different business
contexts.
3 1
Supply Chain
Management
CO-
5002
Develop capabilities in forecasting, coordination
for supply chain integration, inventory
management, procurement, JIT, product and
process design,
2 3 1
Supply Chain
Management
CO-
5003
Understanding of global supply chain management. 3 2
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-II
CO-
5101
To make them understand the psychology of a
customer better in technicality and logically 3 2 1 1
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-II
CO-
5102
To teach them the application of sustainable
marketing techniques in the favor of an
organisation
3 1 2
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing-II
CO-
5103
To acquaint the students with the understanding of
social factor impact on customer psychology 2 1 2
Department of Business Administration Page 52
Attainment of Course Outcome based on Mid- term assessment and End term
assessment.
PO ATTAINMENT TABLE ( 2017-18), (2018-19) (Batch 2017-19) COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF
MANAGEMENT-MBA-101
78 NIL 68.9 58.7 88.0
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR-MBA-103 43 50.7 60.0 37.3 54.2
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS-MBA-105 79 78.7 70.2 70.2 52.4
ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS-MBA 107 37 41.3 23.1 27.6 32.0
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT-MBA-109 72 71.6 46.0 92.0 71.6
SOFT SKILL DEVELOPMENT-MBA-111 41 NIL 40.9 37.3 35.6
BUSINESS STATISTICS-MBA-113 64 55.6 NIL NIL NIL
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN
MANAGEMENT-MBA-115
68 78.0 NIL NIL 56.0
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-MBA 102 28 28.0 16.0 28.0 24.0
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-
MBA-104
40 31.1 37.3 46.7 40.4
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT-MBA-106
80 78.0 NIL NIL NIL
MARKETING MANAGEMENT-MBA-108 71 24.0 47.1 31.1 47.1
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT-MBA-
110
61 92.0 76.7 61.3 76.7
BUSINESS ETHICS-MBA-112 81 63.1 81.3 72.4 54.2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-MBA-114 60 66.0 NIL NIL NIL
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM-
MBA-116
67 81.3 NIL 96.0 66.0
Human Resource Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 83 NIL 52.0 50.7 50.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
75 NIL 32.0 96.0 32.0
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
71 60.4 70.7 80.9 60.4
LABOUR LAW-MBA-211 68 58.3 68.1 87.5 87.5
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-221
73 87.5 72.9 58.3 87.5
MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-231
68 68.1 48.6 77.8 87.5
COUNSELING SKILLS FOR MANAGERS-
MBA-241
71 62.5 61.1 70.8 81.9
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT-MBA-
251
73 87.5 68.1 72.9 72.9
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 50.66 48 50.66 74.66 48
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
55.1 NIL 53.3 56 53.3
Department of Business Administration Page 53
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT:
STRATEGIES AND SYSTEMS-MBA-212
78 58.3 72.9 58.3 87.5
DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS-MBA-222
68 68.1 43.8 87.5 68.1
INTERPERSONAL AND GROUP
DYNAMICS-MBA-232
58 58.3 58.3 68.1 68.1
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT-MBA-
242
58 58.3 NIL 77.8 58.3
CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-252
56 50.0 52.1 58.3 44.4
Financial Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 83 NIL 52.0 50.7 50.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
75 NIL 32.0 96.0 32.0
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
71 60.4 70.7 80.9 60.4
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION & MARKETS-
MBA-213
67 77.8 44.4 66.7 44.4
MERCHANT BANKING & FINANCIAL
SERVICES-MBA-223
78 77.8 44.4 77.8 55.6
SECURITY ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT-MBA-233
78 77.8 55.6 77.8 77.8
INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-243
89 55.6 44.4 66.7 77.8
PROJECT FINANCE-MBA-253 100 100.0 66.7 55.6 77.8
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 50.66 48 50.66 74.66 48
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
55.1 NIL 53.3 56 53.3
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT-MBA-214
100 100.0 88.9 77.8 77.8
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-224
89 77.8 55.6 66.7 88.9
DERIVATIVES MANAGEMENT-MBA-234 56 66.7 44.4 77.8 66.7
MICROFINANCE-MBA-244 67 55.6 88.9 66.7 100.0
COMMERCIAL BANK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-254
67 66.7 33.3 44.4 66.7
Marketing Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 83 NIL 52.0 50.7 50.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
75 NIL 32.0 96.0 32.0
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
71 60.4 70.7 80.9 60.4
INTEGRATED MARKETING
COMMUNICATION-MBA-215
66.66 59.52 NIL 64.28 53.57
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
MANAGEMENT-MBA-225
57.14 50 57.14 57.14 45.23
Department of Business Administration Page 54
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT-
MBA-235
72 NIL 57.1 52.4 41.7
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR-MBA-245 76 34.1 51.6 50.8 60.3
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
I-MBA-255
98 65.1 65.1 54.0 65.1
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 50.66 48 50.66 74.66 48
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
55.1 NIL 53.3 56 53.3
RETAIL MANAGEMENT-MBA-216 36.51 47.62 NIL 40.48 42.86
RELATIONSHIP MARKETING-MBA-226 72 NIL 72.2 41.3 61.9
MARKETING OF SERVICES-MBA-236 83 61.9 61.9 41.3 61.9
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-MBA-246 89 66.7 NIL 66.7 33.3
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
II-MBA-256
23.02 NIL 19.05 8.73 14.29
AVERAGE 65.05 61.73 53.69 60.78 56.97
PO ATTAINMENT TABLE ( 2018-19), (2019-20) (Batch 2018-20) COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF
MANAGEMENT-MBA-101
79 NIL 69.7 59.6 89.4
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR-MBA-103 36 44.0 51.1 32.6 46.6
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS-MBA-105 77 76.6 68.1 68.1 51.1
ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS-MBA 107 32 36.9 19.9 23.2 27.9
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT-MBA-109 45 44.2 30.1 58.2 46.6
SOFT SKILL DEVELOPMENT-MBA-111 24.82 NIL 25.77 14.18 21.28
BUSINESS STATISTICS-MBA-113 69.5 61.7 NIL NIL NIL
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN
MANAGEMENT-MBA-115
38 44.7 NIL NIL 28.4
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-MBA 102 45 44.9 24.8 44.9 38.3
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-
MBA-104
41 31.4 37.0 47.1 41.5
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT-MBA-106
48.9 40.4 NIL NIL NIL
MARKETING MANAGEMENT-MBA-108 74 23.2 49.3 32.4 49.3
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT-MBA-
110
62 93.6 77.0 62.4 77.0
BUSINESS ETHICS-MBA-112 77 59.1 76.6 68.6 51.1
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-MBA-114 71.3 76.6 NIL NIL NIL
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM-
MBA-116
65.2 81.6 NIL 97.9 65.2
Human Resource Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 66 NIL 41.3 40.6 40.1
Department of Business Administration Page 55
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
64 NIL 28.6 83.3 28.6
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
45 39.6 46.9 52.4 39.6
LABOUR LAW-MBA-211 47 38.9 47.2 61.1 61.1
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-221
76 75.0 76.4 57.4 91.7
MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-231
71 71.3 50.9 81.5 91.7
COUNSELING SKILLS FOR MANAGERS-
MBA-241
56 47.2 48.1 56.5 63.9
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT-MBA-
251
50 58.3 46.3 50.0 47.2
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 53 54.5 53 80.3 54.5
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
59.26 NIL 59.26 59.26 59.26
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT:
STRATEGIES AND SYSTEMS-MBA-212
42 24.2 36.4 30.3 36.4
DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS-MBA-222
71 71.3 45.8 91.7 71.3
INTERPERSONAL AND GROUP
DYNAMICS-MBA-232
61 61.1 61.1 71.3 71.3
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT-MBA-
242
61 61.1 NIL 81.5 61.1
CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-252
76 60.6 75.8 80.8 60.6
Financial Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 66 NIL 41.3 40.6 40.1
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
64 NIL 28.6 83.3 28.6
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
45 39.6 46.9 52.4 39.6
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION & MARKETS-
MBA-213
37 44.4 24.6 38.1 25.4
MERCHANT BANKING & FINANCIAL
SERVICES-MBA-223
66 65.1 37.3 64.3 46.8
SECURITY ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT-MBA-233
52 49.2 33.3 49.2 49.2
INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-243
89 55.6 44.4 66.7 77.8
PROJECT FINANCE-MBA-253 76 76.2 51.6 42.9 60.3
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 53 54.5 53 80.3 54.5
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
59.26 NIL 59.26 59.26 59.26
Department of Business Administration Page 56
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT-MBA-214
19 19.0 17.5 14.3 14.3
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-224
92.9 61.9 31.0 61.9 92.9
DERIVATIVES MANAGEMENT-MBA-234 54 65.1 43.7 76.2 65.1
MICROFINANCE-MBA-244 44 36.5 59.5 44.4 66.7
COMMERCIAL BANK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-254
64 65.9 32.5 43.7 64.3
Marketing Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 66 NIL 41.3 40.6 40.1
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
64 NIL 28.6 83.3 28.6
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
45 39.6 46.9 52.4 39.6
INTEGRATED MARKETING
COMMUNICATION-MBA-215
61.66 55 NIL 55 47.5
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
MANAGEMENT-MBA-225
50 25 25 50 20.83
PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT-
MBA-235
78 NIL 60.0 53.3 43.3
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR-MBA-245 72 30.0 46.1 47.8 56.1
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
I-MBA-255
100 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 53 54.5 53 80.3 54.5
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
59.26 NIL 59.26 59.26 59.26
RETAIL MANAGEMENT-MBA-216 44.97 53.97 NIL 53.97 53.97
RELATIONSHIP MARKETING-MBA-226 70 NIL 70.4 40.2 60.3
MARKETING OF SERVICES-MBA-236 37 28.6 28.6 20.1 28.6
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-MBA-246 80 60.3 NIL 60.3 30.2
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
II-MBA-256
73.54 NIL 57.14 27.51 45.50
AVERAGE 59.45 55.39 48.70 55.65 51.83
Department of Business Administration Page 57
PO ATTAINMENT TABLE ( 2019-20), (2020-21) (Batch 2019-21) COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF
MANAGEMENT-MBA-101
79 NIL 67.9 58.6 87.9
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR-MBA-103 19 20.4 28.9 16.3 23.7
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS-MBA-105 31 31.1 27.4 27.4 20.7
ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS-MBA 107 57 64.4 17.8 48.6 64.4
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT-MBA-109 51 50.6 33.0 65.2 50.6
SOFT SKILL DEVELOPMENT-MBA-111 47.73 NIL 48.74 27.27 40.91
BUSINESS STATISTICS-MBA-113 56.5 47.2 NIL NIL NIL
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN
MANAGEMENT-MBA-115
65 75.6 NIL NIL 45.9
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-MBA 102 73 72.6 41.5 72.6 62.2
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-
MBA-104
69 51.9 60.5 77.8 69.1
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT-MBA-106
40.0 40.0 NIL NIL NIL
MARKETING MANAGEMENT-MBA-108 63 21.2 41.9 27.5 41.9
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT-MBA-
110
61 91.1 75.9 60.7 75.9
BUSINESS ETHICS-MBA-112 89 69.1 88.9 79.0 59.3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY-MBA-114 78.9 78.9 NIL NIL NIL
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM-
MBA-116
47.4 59.6 NIL 68.9 47.0
Human Resource Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 85 NIL 53.2 53.2 53.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
76 NIL 32.9 98.4 32.9
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
54 46.5 54.8 62.6 46.5
LABOUR LAW-MBA-211 67 57.1 66.7 85.7 85.7
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-221
83 100.0 83.3 66.7 100.0
MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT-MBA-231
67 66.7 47.6 76.2 85.7
COUNSELING SKILLS FOR MANAGERS-
MBA-241
67 57.1 57.1 66.7 76.2
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT-MBA-
251
72 75.0 63.0 72.2 61.1
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 65.89 66.67 65.89 99.22 66.67
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
66.67 NIL 66.67 66.67 66.67
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT:
STRATEGIES AND SYSTEMS-MBA-212
76 57.1 71.4 57.1 85.7
DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRIAL 67 66.7 42.9 85.7 66.7
Department of Business Administration Page 58
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
RELATIONS-MBA-222
INTERPERSONAL AND GROUP
DYNAMICS-MBA-232
57 57.1 57.1 66.7 66.7
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT-MBA-
242
57 57.1 NIL 76.2 57.1
CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-252
71 57.1 71.4 76.2 57.1
Financial Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 85 NIL 53.2 53.2 53.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
76 NIL 32.9 98.4 32.9
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
54 46.5 54.8 62.6 46.5
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION & MARKETS-
MBA-213
64 74.4 42.5 63.8 42.5
MERCHANT BANKING & FINANCIAL
SERVICES-MBA-223
76 76.8 43.9 76.8 54.5
SECURITY ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT-MBA-233
58 59.9 43.5 58.9 59.9
INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-243
84 51.7 41.5 63.3 72.9
PROJECT FINANCE-MBA-253 100 100.0 66.7 55.6 77.8
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 65.89 66.67 65.89 99.22 66.67
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
66.67 NIL 66.67 66.67 66.67
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT-MBA-214
95 95.5 85.4 73.2 73.7
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT-
MBA-224
95.7 63.8 31.9 63.8 95.7
DERIVATIVES MANAGEMENT-MBA-234 52 61.6 40.9 71.7 61.6
MICROFINANCE-MBA-244 64 53.0 84.8 63.6 95.5
COMMERCIAL BANK MANAGEMENT-
MBA-254
64 63.8 31.9 42.5 63.8
Marketing Management
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-MBA-201 85 NIL 53.2 53.2 53.7
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE
TAXATION-MBA-203
76 NIL 32.9 98.4 32.9
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT-
MBA-205
54 46.5 54.8 62.6 46.5
INTEGRATED MARKETING
COMMUNICATION-MBA-215
68.88 62.96 NIL 80 57.77
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION
MANAGEMENT-MBA-225
86.66 86.66 80 86.66 68.88
PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT-
MBA-235
89 NIL 66.7 66.7 50.0
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR-MBA-245 92 41.0 61.7 61.2 72.1
Department of Business Administration Page 59
COURSES PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
I-MBA-255
100 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-MBA-202 65.89 66.67 65.89 99.22 66.67
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE-
MBA-204
66.67 NIL 66.67 66.67 66.67
RETAIL MANAGEMENT-MBA-216 55.56 66.67 NIL 66.67 66.67
RELATIONSHIP MARKETING-MBA-226 78 NIL 77.8 44.4 66.7
MARKETING OF SERVICES-MBA-236 89 66.7 66.7 44.4 66.7
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-MBA-246 84 66.7 NIL 57.8 33.3
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-
II-MBA-256
88.89 NIL 66.67 33.33 55.56
AVERAGE 65.53 59.55 53.85 61.60 58.48
DIRECT AND INDIRECT ASSESSMENT
Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Direct 2017-19 67.37 63.03 54.62 63.26 58.43
2017-19 Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Alumni 2017-19 74.0 66.0 65.0 63.0 65.0
Employer 2017-19 72.0 68.0 62.0 68.0 65.0
Student 2017-19 76.0 61.0 66.0 65.0 68.0
Averages 74.0 65.0 64.3 65.3 66.0
Overall 69.36 63.62 57.53 63.88 60.70
2018-20 Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Direct 2018-20 59.34 52.52 45.92 55.87 51.24
Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Alumni 2018-20 63.0 72.0 75.0 78.0 71.0
Employer 2018-20 73.0 66.0 77.0 74.0 73.0
Student 2018-20 68.0 68.0 68.0 75.0 70.0
Averages 68.0 68.7 73.3 75.7 71.3
Overall 61.94 57.36 54.14 61.81 57.27
Department of Business Administration Page 60
2019-21 Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Direct 2019-21 69.36 62.18 55.8 65.39 60.95
Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Alumni 2019-21 77.0 67.0 70.0 62.0 72.0
Employer 2019-21 70.0 75.0 63.0 76.0 68.0
Student 2019-21 75.0 76.0 76.0 64.0 65.0
Averages 74.0 72.7 69.7 67.3 68.3
Overall 70.75 65.33 59.96 65.97 63.17
FINAL POs ATTAINMENT
Batch PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
2017-19 67.73 62.71 56.88 62.14 59.68
2018-20 62.02 59.37 56.09 61.66 57.68
2019-21 68.07 63.48 58.60 63.32 61.43
3.2.1. Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which the
evaluation of Course Outcome is based (10)
The department has implemented complete Outcome Based Education (OBE). The assessment
of the course outcome is based on the various assessment techniques implemented in the
department. The faculties regularly monitor the attainment of each student and in case the
attainment of any course is less than the target attainment. Supplementary activities such as
assignments role plays, case studies, activities-based games, group discussion etc. are
conducted.
The attainment is calculated based on direct assessment, consisting of internal assessment and
External assessment. Internal assessment is mapped with Mid1, Mid2, Class Participation and
attendance. External assessment is mapped with End-term assessment. The internal assessment
and external assessment questions are mapped with multiple CO’s. The marks of every student
are tabulated and the final attainment is calculated.
The mid-term 1 is of 15 marks, Mid-term 2 is of 15 marks, Class Participation is of 10 marks,
Attendance is of 10 marks and external is of 50 marks.
Department of Business Administration Page 61
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set
attainment levels (40)
Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses. (The attainment
levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any
higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms
of student performance in internal assessments with respect to the Course Outcomes of a course
in addition to the performance in the University examination)
Subject Name & Code: Principles and Practices of Management MBA-101 Process used for revising/redefining the POs :
We have defined departmental vision, mission and program educational objectives. In
accordance with these and the Graduate Attributes prescribed by NBA, the program outcomes
are defined. The actual program results are compared with the program outcomes (POs) and
the reasons for the inconsistencies, if any, are assessed and considered while redefining POs.
The POs are redefined on the following bases:
1. Interaction with senior student/alumni.
2. Discussion with the senior staff members of the department regarding POs.
3. According to revision of syllabus by institute.
4. Interaction with industry experts on their expectation.
5. Training and placement data.
6. Policies for government sector.
Methodology to define course outcome attainment levels
Methodology to calculate CO, PO Attainment:
Define CO’s for a course and check their quality
Do mapping of CO with PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Prepare CO alignment sheet and decide Grade scale as follows:
Grade scale
Marks Score
≤ 50% 1
>50% and ≤ 60% 2
>60% 3
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO
mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and
employer survey
Department of Business Administration Page 62
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then
write the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 101
Table No 1
PO
s
Cour
se PO1
MBA 101
PO2
PO3 MBA 101
PO4 MBA 101
PO5 MBA 101
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 3
CO2 3 2 2 3
CO3 2 3 2 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
PRINCIPLES AND
PRACTICES OF
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 101)
CO1 Demonstrate the ability to extend the reflection about
basic management concepts and principles.
CO2 Enable the students to connect management theories to
the realistic business set-up.
CO3 To widen practical skills of judgment making and
leadership.
Department of Business Administration Page 63
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 25.6 31 82.58 3 Y 24.7 29 85.00 3 Y 25.8 30 85.83 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 25.7 31 83.01 3 Y 23.7 29 81.67 3 Y 23.6 30 78.61 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 27.1 31 87.31 3 Y 25.0 29 86.03 3 Y 25.0 30 83.28 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 19.7 31 63.66 3 Y 19.3 29 66.44 3 Y 20.0 30 66.67 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 28.9 31 93.12 3 Y 27.1 29 93.56 3 Y 28.0 30 93.33 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam
Upadhyay
25.8 31 83.23 3 Y 24.4 29 84.02 3 Y 24.8 30 82.78 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika
Bansal
22.0 31 70.97 3 Y 21.3 29 73.39 3 Y 21.7 30 72.39 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid
Ahmed
25.8 31 83.23 3 Y 24.3 29 83.79 3 Y 24.9 30 83.00 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 18.4 31 59.25 2 N 19.0 29 65.46 3 Y 20.7 30 68.83 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya
Kumar
23.5 31 75.70 3 Y 22.5 29 77.47 3 Y 24.1 30 80.22 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 18.7 31 60.32 3 Y 17.9 29 61.67 3 Y 18.4 30 61.39 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 26.7 31 86.24 3 Y 24.9 29 85.98 3 Y 25.3 30 84.44 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 23.1 31 74.41 3 Y 22.3 29 76.84 3 Y 22.7 30 75.50 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash
Singhal
26.6 31 85.81 3 Y 25.0 29 86.09 3 Y 25.4 30 84.78 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 24.0 31 77.31 3 Y 23.4 29 80.63 3 Y 24.7 30 82.17 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 27.8 31 89.57 3 Y 26.1 29 90.11 3 Y 27.1 30 90.33 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 64
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
17 41810019 Simran 22.9 31 73.87 3 Y 22.1 29 76.26 3 Y 23.0 30 76.61 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 22.2 31 71.51 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 23.0 30 76.78 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 23.9 31 76.99 3 Y 22.8 29 78.68 3 Y 23.3 30 77.72 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima
Purohit
25.9 31 83.44 3 Y 24.4 29 84.08 3 Y 24.8 30 82.50 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham
Singh
16.2 31 52.15 2 N 15.9 29 54.66 2 N 16.0 30 53.28 2 N
22 41810024 Radhika 26.2 31 84.41 3 Y 22.6 29 77.93 3 Y 21.2 30 70.78 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek
Gupta
16.8 31 54.09 2 N 17.1 29 58.85 2 N 18.2 30 60.56 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 13.5 31 43.55 1 N 13.8 29 47.53 1 N 14.7 30 49.06 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth
Kumar
19.9 31 64.19 3 Y 19.2 29 66.32 3 Y 19.9 30 66.22 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 24.7 31 79.78 3 Y 22.8 29 78.51 3 Y 22.5 30 75.00 3 Y
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 19.8 31 63.76 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 3 Y 18.6 30 61.89 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 20.8 31 67.10 3 Y 18.9 29 65.06 3 Y 18.3 30 61.11 3 Y
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 27.4 31 88.28 3 Y 25.5 29 87.93 3 Y 26.1 30 87.11 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 21.8 31 70.32 3 Y 19.3 29 66.61 3 Y 18.9 30 62.94 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 16.7 31 53.98 2 N 15.5 29 53.51 2 N 14.8 30 49.17 1 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 21.6 31 69.68 3 Y 19.8 29 68.28 3 Y 19.6 30 65.33 3 Y
33 41810035 Manish Tiwari 19.7 31 63.44 3 Y 19.5 29 67.07 3 Y 20.9 30 69.61 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 65
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
34 41810036 Amit
Bhattacharjee
20.6 31 66.45 3 Y 18.9 29 65.11 3 Y 18.5 30 61.72 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 27.4 31 88.28 3 Y 25.5 29 87.93 3 Y 26.1 30 87.11 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 27.2 31 87.63 3 Y 25.5 29 87.99 3 Y 26.3 30 87.72 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 24.5 31 79.03 3 Y 22.1 29 76.03 3 Y 21.5 30 71.50 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 20.1 31 64.95 3 Y 18.5 29 63.79 3 Y 18.4 30 61.22 3 Y
39 41810041 Meghav
Sharma
25.9 31 83.44 3 Y 24.7 29 85.00 3 Y 25.5 30 84.94 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen
Anand
24.8 31 80.00 3 Y 23.7 29 81.78 3 Y 24.5 30 81.61 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer
Singh
19.3 31 62.15 3 Y 17.2 29 59.37 2 N 16.5 30 55.06 2 N
42 41810044 Kumari Priya 22.6 31 72.90 3 Y 22.2 29 76.67 3 Y 23.2 30 77.22 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka
Mehta
26.5 31 85.38 3 Y 25.3 29 87.13 3 Y 26.3 30 87.56 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn
Sharma
25.0 31 80.65 3 Y 24.4 29 84.02 3 Y 25.6 30 85.44 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 22.9 31 73.87 3 Y 21.7 29 74.89 3 Y 22.4 30 74.61 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit
Bhambhani
18.9 31 61.08 3 Y 18.6 29 64.14 3 Y 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 18.3 31 59.03 2 N 18.6 29 64.02 3 Y 20.1 30 67.11 3 Y
Average 2.85 2.87 2.87
Department of Business Administration Page 66
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the above
table) 3 (This is the percentage of
students who have scored
3 point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.85 87.23 10.64 2.13
CO2 2.87 89.36 8.51 2.13
CO3 2.87 91.49 4.26 4.26
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target level
of CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.2 87.23 87.2 58.2 58.2 87.2
CO2 89.4 89.36 89.4 59.6 59.6 89.4
CO3 91.5 91.49 61.0 91.5 61.0 91.5 Avg 89 79 69.7 59.6 89.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
Department of Business Administration Page 67
target level
of CO
CO1 90.9 90.91 90.9 60.6 60.6 90.9
CO2 88.6 88.64 88.6 59.1 59.1 88.6
CO3 84.1 84.09 56.1 84.1 56.1 84.1
Avg 88 79 67.9 58.6 87.9
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target level
of CO
Limit to
max value of
CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.9 97.92 97.9 65.3 65.3 97.9
CO2 97.9 97.92 97.9 65.3 65.3 97.9
CO3 95.8 95.83 63.9 95.8 63.9 95.8
Avg 97 87 75.5 64.8 97.2
Subject Name & Code: Organizational Behaviour MBA-103 Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOR
(MBA-103)
CO1 Basic knowledge of individual and group behaviour
as a distinct field in management with an emphasis
on practical application.
CO2 Enhancement in the students’ understanding of
one’s own behaviour and its impact on others will
enhance the personal & interpersonal skills of the
students.
CO3 Meaningful insight to diagnose and effectively deal
with human behaviour at the workplace.
Department of Business Administration Page 68
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 103
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-103
PO2 MBA-103
PO3 MBA-103
PO4 MBA-103
PO5 MBA-103
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 3 2
CO2 2 3 3
CO3 2 3 2 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 69
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 23.4 31 75.48 3 Y 20.9 29 71.95 3 Y 20.2 30 67.44 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 19.5 31 63.01 3 Y 16.5 29 57.01 2 N 14.9 30 49.78 1 N
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 24.5 31 78.92 3 Y 23.5 29 81.15 3 Y 24.5 30 81.67 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 16.3 31 52.47 2 N 15.4 29 52.99 2 N 15.9 30 52.89 2 N
5 41810005 Himani 25.9 31 83.66 3 Y 25.1 29 86.55 3 Y 26.5 30 88.22 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 18.5 31 59.57 2 N 16.8 29 58.05 2 N 16.2 30 54.00 2 N
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 16.9 31 54.41 2 N 18.2 29 62.87 3 Y 20.4 30 68.00 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid 20.1 31 64.73 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.7 30 65.78 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 17.0 31 54.73 2 N 15.8 29 54.48 2 N 15.7 30 52.44 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 18.4 31 59.35 2 N 16.2 29 55.86 2 N 15.4 30 51.33 2 N
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 7.2 31 23.12 1 N 7.3 29 25.29 1 N 6.5 30 21.67 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 20.9 31 67.31 3 Y 20.0 29 69.08 3 Y 20.6 30 68.67 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 21.9 31 70.75 3 Y 19.8 29 68.28 3 Y 19.3 30 64.22 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 19.9 31 64.30 3 Y 18.3 29 62.99 3 Y 18.3 30 61.00 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 20.3 31 65.48 3 Y 18.3 29 63.10 3 Y 17.9 30 59.67 2 N
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 22.8 31 73.66 3 Y 20.9 29 72.18 3 Y 20.7 30 69.11 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 19.6 31 63.33 3 Y 19.5 29 67.24 3 Y 20.9 30 69.56 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 18.4 31 59.46 2 N 17.4 29 60.11 3 Y 17.6 30 58.78 2 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 19.1 31 61.72 3 Y 18.5 29 63.68 3 Y 18.9 30 63.00 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 12.9 31 41.51 1 N 12.1 29 41.72 1 N 11.5 30 38.44 1 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 19.8 31 63.98 3 Y 18.2 29 62.87 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 17.5 31 56.45 2 N 17.6 29 60.80 3 Y 18.9 30 62.89 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 14.1 31 45.48 1 N 13.9 29 48.05 1 N 15.0 30 49.89 1 N
24 41810026 11.4 31 36.88 1 N 11.1 29 38.39 1 N 11.4 30 38.11 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 16.0 31 51.72 2 N 14.7 29 50.57 2 N 14.3 30 47.67 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 70
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 17.7 31 56.99 2 N 16.3 29 56.32 2 N 16.0 30 53.33 2 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 19.6 31 63.33 3 Y 18.8 29 64.71 3 Y 19.6 30 65.33 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 14.3 31 46.02 1 N 14.5 29 49.89 1 N 15.8 30 52.56 2 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 24.0 31 77.53 3 Y 22.2 29 76.55 3 Y 22.8 30 75.89 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 19.1 31 61.51 3 Y 16.4 29 56.67 2 N 15.5 30 51.67 2 N
31 41810033 Megha 7.5 31 24.09 1 N 7.4 29 25.63 1 N 6.6 30 22.00 1 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 16.0 31 51.61 2 N 14.2 29 48.97 1 N 13.8 30 46.00 1 N
33 41810035 Manish Tiwari 18.8 31 60.65 3 Y 17.6 29 60.69 3 Y 18.1 30 60.33 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 16.5 31 53.33 2 N 14.9 29 51.26 2 N 14.6 30 48.67 1 N
35 41810037 Ajay 25.1 31 80.97 3 Y 22.5 29 77.70 3 Y 22.4 30 74.56 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 21.1 31 68.06 3 Y 19.9 29 68.62 3 Y 20.5 30 68.33 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 17.5 31 56.45 2 N 16.7 29 57.47 2 N 17.3 30 57.78 2 N
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 17.5 31 56.34 2 N 14.5 29 50.11 2 N 13.5 30 45.00 1 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 19.3 31 62.15 3 Y 19.0 29 65.63 3 Y 20.2 30 67.33 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 21.0 31 67.74 3 Y 19.3 29 66.44 3 Y 19.2 30 64.11 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 12.8 31 41.29 1 N 11.4 29 39.20 1 N 10.3 30 34.44 1 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.2 31 65.16 3 Y 16.9 29 58.39 2 N 15.4 30 51.22 2 N
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 23.9 31 77.20 3 Y 22.5 29 77.70 3 Y 23.0 30 76.78 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 20.2 31 65.16 3 Y 17.6 29 60.57 3 Y 16.2 30 54.11 2 N
45 41810047 Archana Saini 17.5 31 56.45 2 N 17.5 29 60.34 3 Y 19.0 30 63.33 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 16.8 31 54.19 2 N 14.8 29 51.03 2 N 14.4 30 48.00 1 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 19.9 31 64.19 3 Y 19.4 29 67.01 3 Y 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y
Average 2.38 2.38 2.23
Department of Business Administration Page 71
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON
SCALE OF
3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above
table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 2.38 53.19 31.91 14.89
CO2 2.38 55.32 27.66 17.02
CO3 2.23 48.94 25.53 25.53
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 53.2 35.5 0.0 53.2 0.0 35.5
CO2 55.3 36.9 55.3 0.0 0.0 55.3
CO3 48.9 0.0 32.6 48.9 32.6 48.9
Avg. 52 36 44.0 51.1 32.6 46.6
Department of Business Administration Page 72
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level
of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 33.3 22.2 0.0 33.3 0.0 22.2
CO2 24.4 16.3 24.4 0.0 0.0 24.4
CO3 24.4 0.0 16.3 24.4 16.3 24.4
Avg. 27 19 20.4 28.9 16.3 23.7
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level
of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.9 65.3 0.0 97.9 0.0 65.3
CO2 97.9 65.3 97.9 0.0 0.0 97.9
CO3 97.9 0.0 65.3 97.9 65.3 97.9
Avg. 98 65 81.6 97.9 65.3 87.0
Department of Business Administration Page 73
Subject Name & Code: Managerial Economics MBA-105
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-105
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-105
PO2 MBA-105
PO3 MBA-105
PO4 MBA-105
PO5 MBA-105
Course Cos Course Outcomes
MANAGERIAL
ECONOMICS
(MBA-105)
CO1 Understand theories related to managerial economics
and role of manager in firms.
CO2 Design competition strategies, including costing,
pricing, product differentiation, and market
environment.
CO3 Analyze real business problems and able to take
business decisions judicially.
Department of Business Administration Page 74
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2 2 2
CO2 3 3 3 3 2
CO3 3 3 3 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 75
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 31.4 33 78.99 3 Y 22.4 29 77.13 3 Y 21.1 28 75.24 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 30.3 33 78.79 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 31.6 33 80.30 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 20.1 28 71.67 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 21.5 33 77.37 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 19.1 28 68.10 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 33.5 33 87.58 3 Y 24.5 29 84.48 3 Y 22.6 28 80.71 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 26.5 33 77.78 3 Y 21.2 29 73.22 3 Y 19.1 28 68.21 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 21.5 33 61.82 3 Y 17.7 29 61.03 3 Y 16.4 28 58.57 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 26.8 33 74.04 3 Y 20.9 29 72.07 3 Y 19.2 28 68.45 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 20.2 33 76.46 3 Y 22.0 29 75.86 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 21.0 33 74.04 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 20.2 28 72.02 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 16.6 33 62.83 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 17.1 28 61.19 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.7 33 80.20 3 Y 22.8 29 78.74 3 Y 21.7 28 77.50 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 30.0 33 82.32 3 Y 22.9 29 79.08 3 Y 21.4 28 76.43 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 26.8 33 62.73 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 17.4 28 62.02 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 25.8 33 80.00 3 Y 22.0 29 75.98 3 Y 20.1 28 71.67 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 29.5 33 85.56 3 Y 24.0 29 82.76 3 Y 22.3 28 79.52 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 24.3 33 62.83 3 Y 18.0 29 61.95 3 Y 16.3 28 58.21 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 21.6 33 66.57 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 18.3 28 65.48 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 28.0 33 78.59 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 20.1 28 71.90 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 19.1 33 62.63 3 Y 17.7 29 61.15 3 Y 16.1 28 57.50 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 23.4 33 66.46 3 Y 18.9 29 65.29 3 Y 17.6 28 62.98 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 27.5 33 74.34 3 Y 21.1 29 72.87 3 Y 19.8 28 70.83 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 16.9 33 65.56 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.2 28 68.45 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 17.5 33 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 28 0.00 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 76
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 21.4 33 49.09 1 N 14.5 29 50.11 2 N 14.3 28 50.95 2 N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 20.0 33 43.74 1 N 13.5 29 46.44 1 N 13.1 28 46.79 1 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 23.5 33 66.26 3 Y 18.8 29 64.83 3 Y 17.3 28 61.90 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 16.4 33 54.34 2 N 16.3 29 56.09 2 N 15.8 28 56.43 2 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 28.0 33 79.60 3 Y 22.1 29 76.21 3 Y 20.1 28 71.90 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 23.0 33 84.34 3 Y 24.2 29 83.45 3 Y 23.0 28 82.02 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 5.8 33 44.85 1 N 14.7 29 50.57 2 N 16.0 28 57.26 2 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 20.9 33 48.48 1 N 15.1 29 51.95 2 N 14.9 28 53.33 2 N
33 41810035 Manish Kumar Tiwari 23.4 33 65.35 3 Y 18.6 29 64.02 3 Y 17.4 28 62.02 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 23.0 33 58.99 2 N 17.9 29 61.84 3 Y 17.1 28 61.07 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.4 33 54.85 2 N 18.1 29 62.53 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 29.7 33 75.15 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 20.2 28 72.14 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 20.7 33 70.91 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 18.0 28 64.29 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 14.9 33 54.44 2 N 16.0 29 55.29 2 N 15.5 28 55.36 2 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 27.1 33 66.87 3 Y 19.1 29 65.86 3 Y 18.3 28 65.48 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 27.4 33 64.55 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.0 28 67.86 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 16.5 33 49.60 1 N 15.2 29 52.30 2 N 15.0 28 53.45 2 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.9 33 68.08 3 Y 19.3 29 66.67 3 Y 17.7 28 63.21 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 29.1 33 80.61 3 Y 22.4 29 77.36 3 Y 20.5 28 73.10 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 19.5 33 70.10 3 Y 20.9 29 72.18 3 Y 20.4 28 72.98 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 23.0 33 70.20 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 18.2 28 65.12 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 19.0 33 46.67 1 N 14.1 29 48.62 1 N 14.0 28 50.00 1 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 27.6 33 62.73 3 Y 18.1 29 62.41 3 Y 16.2 28 57.86 2 N
Average 2.62 2.74 2.66
Department of Business Administration Page 77
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from the
above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.62 76.60 8.51 14.89
CO2 2.74 80.85 12.77 6.38
CO3 2.66 72.34 21.28 6.38
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 76.6 76.60 76.6 76.6 51.1 51.1 51.1
CO2 80.9 80.85 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 53.9
CO3 72.3 72.34 72.3 72.3 72.3 72.3 48.2 Avg 77 77 76.6 68.1 68.1 51.1
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 33.3 33.33 33.3 33.3 22.2 22.2 22.2
CO2 33.3 33.33 33.3 33.3 33.3 33.3 22.2
CO3 26.7 26.67 26.7 26.7 26.7 26.7 17.8 Avg 31 31 31.1 27.4 27.4 20.7
Department of Business Administration Page 78
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 66.7 66.67 66.7 66.7 44.4 44.4 44.4
CO2 81.3 81.25 81.3 81.3 81.3 81.3 54.2
CO3 81.3 81.25 81.3 81.3 81.3 81.3 54.2 Avg 76 76 76.4 69.0 69.0 50.9
Subject Name & Code: Accounting for Managers MBA-107 Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
ACCOUNTING
FOR MANAGERS
(MBA 107)
CO1 Identify the basic principles of accounting and ability
to read, interpret and analyse the financial statement
CO2 Predict the cost behaviours and their application in
short term, long-term decision-making, budgetary
planning and controlling.
CO3 Develop an awareness of the need to consider ethical,
social and other relevant issues, in addition to financial
information, in management decision-making process.
Department of Business Administration Page 79
MBA 107
Table No 1
POs
Course
PO1 MBA 107
PO2 MBA 107
PO3 MBA 107
PO4 MBA 107
PO5 MBA 107
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2 3 3
CO2 3 3 2 2 2
CO3 2 3 1 1 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 80
Table No 3 S. No
Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM MO MM %
age
Score Y/N %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 20.7 31 19.2 30 64.06 3 Y 65.86 3 Y 19.2 30 64.06 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 20.1 31 21.0 30 69.83 3 Y 68.97 3 Y 21.0 30 69.83 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 20.0 31 19.1 30 63.72 3 Y 65.06 3 Y 19.1 30 63.72 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 13.1 31 13.2 30 43.83 1 N 44.14 1 N 13.2 30 43.83 1 N
5 41810005 Himani 20.3 31 19.0 30 63.33 3 Y 64.60 3 Y 19.0 30 63.33 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam
Upadhyay
16.6 31 17.1 30 57.11 3 Y 55.98 3 Y 17.1 30 57.11 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika
Bansal
14.3 31 15.3 30 51.11 2 N 49.43 2 N 15.3 30 51.11 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid 14.2 31 16.1 30 53.78 2 N 50.46 2 N 16.1 30 53.78 2 N
9 41810009 Anjali 12.4 31 11.2 30 37.39 1 N 39.43 1 N 11.2 30 37.39 1 N
10 41810010 Udeshya
Kumar
13.9 31 16.6 30 55.17 3 Y 50.34 2 N 16.6 30 55.17 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 6.1 31 5.8 30 19.33 1 N 21.15 1 N 5.8 30 19.33 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 14.5 31 14.5 30 48.22 2 N 48.39 2 N 14.5 30 48.22 2 N
13 41810015 Vani 13.3 31 14.1 30 47.00 2 N 45.17 2 N 14.1 30 47.00 2 N
14 41810016 Aakash
Singhal
17.6 31 18.1 30 60.39 3 Y 59.54 3 Y 18.1 30 60.39 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 17.9 31 17.8 30 59.44 3 Y 59.54 3 Y 17.8 30 59.44 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 19.2 31 18.5 30 61.78 3 Y 62.99 3 Y 18.5 30 61.78 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 12.3 31 13.1 30 43.67 1 N 43.45 1 N 13.1 30 43.67 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 81
S. No
Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM MO MM %
age
Score Y/N %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 14.4 31 15.9 30 53.11 2 N 50.57 2 N 15.9 30 53.11 2 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 19.8 31 21.4 30 71.39 3 Y 68.28 3 Y 21.4 30 71.39 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima
Purohit
16.2 31 17.6 30 58.50 3 Y 56.21 3 Y 17.6 30 58.50 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham
Singh
16.8 31 16.9 30 56.28 3 Y 56.32 3 Y 16.9 30 56.28 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 13.6 31 15.4 30 51.39 2 N 48.28 2 N 15.4 30 51.39 2 N
23 41810025 Abhishek
Gupta
11.8 31 11.8 30 39.17 1 N 39.43 1 N 11.8 30 39.17 1 N
24 41810027 Siddharth
Kumar
12.9 31 11.4 30 37.83 1 N 40.57 1 N 11.4 30 37.83 1 N
25 41810028 Ravish Garg 11.7 31 9.2 30 30.56 1 N 34.94 1 N 9.2 30 30.56 1 N
26 41810029 Nishant Sethi 20.2 31 18.8 30 62.72 3 Y 65.63 3 Y 18.8 30 62.72 3 Y
27 41810030 Diksha Singh 11.4 31 12.2 30 40.67 1 N 39.31 1 N 12.2 30 40.67 1 N
28 41810031 Palak Gupta 10.1 31 12.1 30 40.33 1 N 37.24 1 N 12.1 30 40.33 1 N
29 41810032 Swati Arora 15.2 31 15.2 30 50.67 2 N 50.34 2 N 15.2 30 50.67 2 N
30 41810033 Megha 14.6 31 13.7 30 45.56 2 N 47.36 2 N 13.7 30 45.56 2 N
31 41810034 Anuj Kumar 11.4 31 12.2 30 40.67 1 N 39.31 1 N 12.2 30 40.67 1 N
32 41810035 Manish Tiwari 19.7 31 19.6 30 65.28 3 Y 64.71 3 Y 19.6 30 65.28 3 Y
33 41810036 Amit
Bhattacharjee
13.3 31 15.7 30 52.33 2 N 48.28 2 N 15.7 30 52.33 2 N
34 41810037 Ajay 11.3 31 13.7 30 45.67 2 N 41.49 1 N 13.7 30 45.67 2 N
Department of Business Administration Page 82
S. No
Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM MO MM %
age
Score Y/N %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
35 41810038 Shivani 21.4 31 21.2 30 70.61 3 Y 70.57 3 Y 21.2 30 70.61 3 Y
36 41810039 Bhawana 22.6 31 22.6 30 75.33 3 Y 75.29 3 Y 22.6 30 75.33 3 Y
37 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 13.9 31 14.4 30 48.06 2 N 47.36 2 N 14.4 30 48.06 2 N
38 41810041 Meghav
Sharma
11.7 31 12.6 30 42.11 1 N 40.23 1 N 12.6 30 42.11 1 N
39 41810042 Shaleen
Anand
18.1 31 17.5 30 58.44 3 Y 59.77 3 Y 17.5 30 58.44 3 Y
40 41810043 Karamveer
Singh
13.3 31 15.6 30 52.06 2 N 48.51 2 N 15.6 30 52.06 2 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 10.9 31 12.7 30 42.33 1 N 39.31 1 N 12.7 30 42.33 1 N
42 41810045 Priyanka
Mehta
12.1 31 12.9 30 43.00 1 N 41.49 1 N 12.9 30 43.00 1 N
43 41810046 Abhinn
Sharma
15.6 31 18.3 30 60.83 3 Y 55.75 3 Y 18.3 30 60.83 3 Y
44 41810047 Archana Saini 14.5 31 17.2 30 57.28 3 Y 52.76 2 N 17.2 30 57.28 3 Y
45 41810048 Mohit
Bhambhani
16.3 31 14.1 30 47.11 2 N 50.34 2 N 14.1 30 47.11 2 N
46 41810049 Supriya Dogra 16.4 31 15.9 30 53.06 2 N 54.14 2 N 15.9 30 53.06 2 N
Department of Business Administration Page 83
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE OF
3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 1.87 29.79 27.66 42.55
CO2 2.09 38.30 31.91 29.79
CO3 2.15 42.55 29.79 27.66
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 29.8 29.8 29.8 19.9 29.8 29.8
CO2 38.3 38.3 38.3 25.5 25.5 25.5
CO3 42.6 28.4 42.6 14.2 14.2 28.4
Avg. 36.9 32 36.9 19.9 23.2 27.9
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to
set target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.1 71.1 71.1 0.0 23.7 71.1
CO2 68.9 45.9 68.9 0.0 68.9 68.9
CO3 53.3 53.3 53.3 17.8 53.3 53.3
Avg. 64.43 57 64.4 17.8 48.6 64.4
Department of Business Administration Page 84
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to
set target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.8 95.8 95.8 0.0 31.9 95.8
CO2 97.9 65.3 97.9 0.0 97.9 97.9
CO3 91.7 91.7 91.7 30.6 91.7 91.7
Avg. 95.13 84 95.1 30.6 73.8 95.1
Subject Name & Code: Business Environment MBA-109
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-109
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-109
PO2 MBA-109
PO3 MBA-109
PO4 MBA-109
PO5 MBA-109
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
BUSINESS
ENVIRONMENT
(MBA-109)
CO1 To understand and analyze global, economic, legal aspects of
business environment and the conception of business working.
CO2 The students are expected to understand the SWOT analysis of
business and about fiscal market functioning.
CO3 The learning about the economic and non-economic aspects
related to business will also be acquired by the students.
Department of Business Administration Page 85
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 3 2
CO2 2 3 3 2
CO3 2 2 1 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 86
Table No. 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 31.4 38 82.63 3 Y 17.8 21 84.76 3 Y 25.8 31 83.23 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 30.3 38 79.74 3 Y 17.0 21 80.95 3 Y 24.7 31 79.68 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 31.6 38 83.07 3 Y 17.4 21 82.86 3 Y 26.0 31 83.98 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 21.5 38 56.58 2 N 11.6 21 55.24 2 N 18.9 31 60.97 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 33.5 38 88.25 3 Y 18.4 21 87.62 3 Y 28.1 31 90.54 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 26.5 38 69.74 3 Y 14.5 21 69.21 3 Y 23.0 31 74.09 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 21.5 38 56.49 2 N 11.6 21 55.24 2 N 18.9 31 61.08 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 26.8 38 70.61 3 Y 14.9 21 71.11 3 Y 23.2 31 74.95 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 20.2 38 53.07 2 N 11.4 21 54.29 2 N 17.4 31 56.24 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 21.0 38 55.26 2 N 11.6 21 55.24 2 N 18.4 31 59.35 2 N
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 16.6 38 43.60 1 N 9.6 21 45.71 1 N 13.8 31 44.62 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.7 38 59.74 2 N 10.9 21 52.06 2 N 22.4 31 72.15 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 30.0 38 79.04 3 Y 16.5 21 78.41 3 Y 25.5 31 82.26 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 26.8 38 70.53 3 Y 14.9 21 71.11 3 Y 23.3 31 75.05 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 25.8 38 67.81 3 Y 14.6 21 69.52 3 Y 21.6 31 69.78 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 29.5 38 77.54 3 Y 16.1 21 76.83 3 Y 24.4 31 78.71 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 24.3 38 63.86 3 Y 12.9 21 61.59 3 Y 20.8 31 67.10 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 21.6 38 56.84 2 N 11.3 21 53.97 2 N 21.1 31 67.96 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 28.0 38 73.68 3 Y 15.5 21 73.97 3 Y 24.5 31 78.92 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 19.1 38 50.18 2 N 10.4 21 49.52 1 N 16.5 31 53.33 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 23.4 38 61.67 3 Y 12.6 21 60.00 2 N 21.0 31 67.63 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 27.5 38 72.37 3 Y 14.4 21 68.57 3 Y 25.1 31 80.97 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 16.9 38 44.47 1 N 10.0 21 47.62 1 N 14.1 31 45.48 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 87
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 17.5 38 46.05 1 N 10.3 21 48.89 1 N 14.2 31 45.91 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 21.4 38 56.40 2 N 11.6 21 55.24 2 N 19.0 31 61.18 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 20.0 38 52.54 2 N 10.6 21 50.48 2 N 17.4 31 56.24 2 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 23.5 38 61.84 3 Y 13.1 21 62.22 3 Y 20.4 31 65.91 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 16.4 38 43.16 1 N 10.0 21 47.62 1 N 13.6 31 43.87 1 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 28.0 38 73.68 3 Y 15.5 21 73.97 3 Y 24.5 31 78.92 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 23.0 38 60.61 3 Y 11.3 21 53.97 2 N 22.6 31 73.01 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 5.8 38 15.18 1 N 4.3 21 20.63 1 N 4.9 31 15.81 1 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 20.9 38 55.09 2 N 13.0 21 61.90 3 Y 15.1 31 48.60 1 N
33 41810035 Manish Kumar Tiwari 23.4 38 61.49 3 Y 12.8 21 60.95 3 Y 20.8 31 67.20 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 23.0 38 60.61 3 Y 12.4 21 59.05 2 N 20.6 31 66.34 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.4 38 77.28 3 Y 16.3 21 77.78 3 Y 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 29.7 38 78.25 3 Y 17.2 21 81.90 3 Y 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 20.7 38 54.39 2 N 11.2 21 53.33 2 N 18.1 31 58.49 2 N
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 14.9 38 39.30 1 N 8.3 21 39.37 1 N 14.8 31 47.74 1 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 27.1 38 71.32 3 Y 15.5 21 73.65 3 Y 22.4 31 72.37 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 27.4 38 72.02 3 Y 14.7 21 70.16 3 Y 23.9 31 77.10 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 16.5 38 43.33 1 N 8.5 21 40.63 1 N 16.0 31 51.61 2 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.9 38 55.09 2 N 11.2 21 53.33 2 N 19.9 31 64.09 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 29.1 38 76.67 3 Y 16.3 21 77.46 3 Y 24.6 31 79.35 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 19.5 38 51.40 2 N 10.5 21 50.16 2 N 18.9 31 61.08 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 23.0 38 60.53 3 Y 12.0 21 57.14 2 N 22.0 31 70.97 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 19.0 38 50.00 1 N 10.7 21 50.79 2 N 17.3 31 55.91 2 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 27.6 38 72.63 3 Y 15.3 21 73.02 3 Y 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 88
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
Average 2.38 2.32 2.55
Department of Business Administration Page 89
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.13 40.43 31.91 27.66
CO2 2.04 40.43 23.40 36.17
CO3 2.40 59.57 21.28 19.15
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 40.43 40.4 27.0 27.0 40.4 27.0
CO2 40.43 27.0 40.4 0.0 40.4 27.0
CO3 59.57 39.7 39.7 19.9 59.6 59.6
Avg. 58 45 44.2 30.1 58.2 46.6
Department of Business Administration Page 90
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 62.22 62.2 41.5 41.5 62.2 41.5
CO2 62.22 41.5 62.2 0.0 62.2 41.5
CO3 62.22 41.5 41.5 20.7 62.2 62.2
Avg. 65 51 50.6 33.0 65.2 50.6
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 93.75 93.8 62.5 62.5 93.8 62.5
CO2 97.92 65.3 97.9 0.0 97.9 65.3
CO3 93.75 62.5 62.5 31.3 93.8 93.8
Avg. 99 77 77.3 49.7 99.3 77.1
Subject Name & Code: Soft Skill Development MBA-111
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
SOFT SKILL
DEVELOPMENT
(MBA-111)
CO1 To provide the student the understanding of the power of a good
communication in today’s corporate world.
CO2 To empower the student with a strong and confident personality
that will help portray a strong character.
CO3 To shape careers of student in the long run and provide them with
the ethical conduct of communication.
Department of Business Administration Page 91
MBA-111
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 111
PO2
PO3 MBA 111
PO4 MBA 111
PO5 MBA 111
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2
CO2 2 3 2 2
CO3 2 1 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 92
Table No. 3
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 19.8 31 63.98 3 Y 17.6 29 60.80 3 Y 17.5 30 58.44 2 N
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 19.7 31 63.55 3 Y 17.9 29 61.84 3 Y 18.4 30 61.22 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 19.1 31 61.72 3 Y 18.0 29 61.95 3 Y 17.9 30 59.67 2 N
4 41810004 Tista Lather 14.4 31 46.34 1 N 14.2 29 49.08 1 N 14.9 30 49.67 1 N
5 41810005 Himani 23.7 31 76.56 3 Y 21.9 29 75.40 3 Y 22.4 30 74.67 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 17.9 31 57.63 2 N 16.1 29 55.63 2 N 16.0 30 53.33 2 N
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 15.4 31 49.78 1 N 14.5 29 50.11 2 N 15.0 30 50.11 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 16.4 31 52.80 2 N 15.5 29 53.45 2 N 16.1 30 53.78 2 N
9 41810009 Anjali 15.3 31 49.35 1 N 15.1 29 51.95 2 N 16.1 30 53.78 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 19.6 31 63.33 3 Y 18.2 29 62.64 3 Y 18.2 30 60.67 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 14.4 31 46.34 1 N 12.5 29 42.99 1 N 11.2 30 37.22 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 18.2 31 58.60 2 N 17.9 29 61.61 3 Y 19.0 30 63.22 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 19.2 31 61.94 3 Y 18.2 29 62.76 3 Y 18.6 30 62.00 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 18.5 31 59.68 2 N 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 18.7 31 60.32 3 Y 18.2 29 62.76 3 Y 19.1 30 63.67 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 18.9 31 60.86 3 Y 17.9 29 61.72 3 Y 18.2 30 60.78 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 15.0 31 48.49 1 N 15.4 29 52.99 2 N 16.6 30 55.33 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 13.8 31 44.52 1 N 13.5 29 46.67 1 N 14.7 30 48.89 1 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 17.2 31 55.48 2 N 15.9 29 54.83 2 N 15.9 30 53.00 2 N
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 16.2 31 52.37 2 N 15.5 29 53.33 2 N 16.3 30 54.33 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 16.8 31 54.19 2 N 16.0 29 55.29 2 N 16.7 30 55.56 2 N
22 41810024 Radhika 17.9 31 57.63 2 N 16.0 29 55.29 2 N 15.6 30 52.00 2 N
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 16.0 31 51.51 2 N 15.3 29 52.87 2 N 15.7 30 52.33 2 N
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 15.7 31 50.75 2 N 13.2 29 45.63 1 N 11.5 30 38.44 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 12.8 31 41.40 1 N 13.6 29 46.90 1 N 14.6 30 48.56 1 N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 12.8 31 41.40 1 N 13.3 29 45.75 1 N 13.9 30 46.33 1 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 15.3 31 49.35 1 N 14.1 29 48.51 1 N 14.1 30 47.11 1 N
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 14.6 31 47.20 1 N 13.7 29 47.24 1 N 14.2 30 47.22 1 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 20.5 31 66.24 3 Y 19.6 29 67.47 3 Y 20.4 30 68.00 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 17.2 31 55.48 2 N 16.6 29 57.13 2 N 17.2 30 57.44 2 N
31 41810033 Megha 16.8 31 54.09 2 N 15.1 29 52.18 2 N 15.1 30 50.33 2 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 17.8 31 57.53 2 N 15.1 29 52.18 2 N 14.0 30 46.78 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 93
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
33 41810035 Manish Tiwari 12.8 31 41.29 1 N 11.8 29 40.69 1 N 11.4 30 38.00 1 N
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 17.1 31 55.05 2 N 16.1 29 55.52 2 N 16.3 30 54.44 2 N
35 41810037 Ajay 19.0 31 61.40 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 19.0 31 61.40 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 15.6 31 50.32 2 N 15.4 29 52.99 2 N 16.0 30 53.44 2 N
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 15.3 31 49.46 1 N 14.7 29 50.80 2 N 15.4 30 51.44 2 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 15.5 31 49.89 1 N 15.0 29 51.72 2 N 15.5 30 51.78 2 N
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 19.1 31 61.61 3 Y 17.7 29 61.15 3 Y 17.7 30 58.89 2 N
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 13.3 31 42.90 1 N 11.5 29 39.54 1 N 10.2 30 34.11 1 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 15.6 31 50.22 2 N 14.8 29 51.03 2 N 15.1 30 50.44 2 N
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 20.6 31 66.56 3 Y 18.5 29 63.68 3 Y 18.4 30 61.33 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 17.3 31 55.81 2 N 15.7 29 54.14 2 N 15.5 30 51.67 2 N
45 41810047 Archana Saini 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 18.0 29 62.07 3 Y 18.1 30 60.44 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 19.5 31 63.01 3 Y 17.8 29 61.38 3 Y 17.7 30 58.89 2 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 17.2 31 55.38 2 N 16.0 29 55.17 2 N 16.3 30 54.44 2 N
Average 2.02 2.15 2.04
Department of Business Administration Page 94
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.02 31.91 38.30 29.79
CO2 2.15 36.17 42.55 21.28
CO3 2.04 27.66 48.94 23.40
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO
2
PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 31.91 31.91 31.91 31.9
1
0.00 21.2
8
CO2 36.17 36.17 24.11 36.1
7
24.1
1
24.1
1
CO3 27.66 27.66 18.44 9.22 18.4
4
18.4
4
Avg 31.91 24.82 25.7
7
14.1
8
21.2
8
Department of Business Administration Page 95
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 61.36 61.36 61.36 61.36 40.91
CO2 65.91 65.91 43.94 65.91 43.94 43.94
CO3 56.82 56.82 37.88 18.94 37.88 37.88
Avg 61.36 47.73 48.74 27.27 40.91
Table No 5 (2020-21)
C
O
CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value of CO
attainment
PO
1
P
O
2
PO
3
PO
4
PO
5
C
O1
58.33 58.33 58.
33
58.
33
0.0
0
38.
89
C
O2
66.67 66.67 44.
44
66.
67
44.
44
44.
44
C
O3
50.00 50.00 33.
33
16.
67
33.
33
33.
33
Avg 58.33 45.
37
47.
22
25.
93
38.
89
Subject Name & Code: Business Statistics MBA-113
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
BUSINESS
STATISTICS
(MBA-113)
CO1 Identify statistical tools needed to solve various
business problems.
CO2 Apply various probability distributions to various
business problems.
CO3 Develop Analytical and critical thinking abilities for
data-based decision making
Department of Business Administration Page 96
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
BS 113
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 BS 113
PO2 BS 113
PO3
PO4
PO5
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2
CO2 3 2
CO3 2 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 97
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 32.3 33 97.98 3 Y 28.7 29 98.85 3 Y 28.0 28 100.00 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 30.2 33 91.52 3 Y 25.9 29 89.31 3 Y 23.9 28 85.36 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 30.3 33 91.92 3 Y 27.7 29 95.40 3 Y 28.0 28 100.00 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 19.4 33 58.89 2 N 18.5 29 63.68 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 30.0 33 91.01 3 Y 25.8 29 88.85 3 Y 24.7 28 88.21 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 24.9 33 75.56 3 Y 20.6 29 70.92 3 Y 20.0 28 71.43 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 28.6 33 86.67 3 Y 22.7 29 78.28 3 Y 19.2 28 68.57 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid
Ahmed
26.0 33 78.89 3 Y 23.8 29 81.95 3 Y 24.7 28 88.21 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 11.7 33 35.45 1 N 12.0 29 41.38 1 N 13.3 28 47.50 1 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 25.9 33 78.59 3 Y 22.7 29 78.16 3 Y 22.9 28 81.79 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 13.5 33 40.91 1 N 14.5 29 50.00 1 N 17.0 28 60.71 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 20.5 33 62.02 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 17.6 28 62.86 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 31.0 33 93.94 3 Y 26.5 29 91.38 3 Y 24.5 28 87.50 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 24.8 33 75.25 3 Y 23.4 29 80.57 3 Y 24.8 28 88.57 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 26.6 33 80.61 3 Y 21.7 29 74.83 3 Y 19.2 28 68.57 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 27.7 33 83.84 3 Y 23.8 29 82.18 3 Y 22.0 28 78.57 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 20.4 33 61.82 3 Y 16.7 29 57.59 2 N 15.4 28 55.00 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 19.4 33 58.79 2 N 14.6 29 50.34 2 N 12.0 28 42.86 1 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 23.4 33 70.81 3 Y 19.9 29 68.74 3 Y 18.2 28 65.00 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 31.0 33 93.94 3 Y 27.0 29 93.10 3 Y 26.0 28 92.86 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 27.3 33 82.63 3 Y 24.5 29 84.60 3 Y 24.2 28 86.43 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 24.8 33 75.05 3 Y 23.1 29 79.77 3 Y 25.1 28 89.64 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 26.1 33 78.99 3 Y 22.6 29 78.05 3 Y 21.3 28 76.07 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 17.6 33 53.33 2 N 15.9 29 54.83 2 N 16.5 28 58.93 2 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 25.9 33 78.59 3 Y 23.4 29 80.57 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 27.0 33 81.82 3 Y 23.0 29 79.31 3 Y 21.5 28 76.79 3 Y
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 28.6 33 86.67 3 Y 25.7 29 88.62 3 Y 25.7 28 91.79 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 98
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 23.0 33 69.60 3 Y 19.4 29 67.01 3 Y 19.6 28 70.00 3 Y
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 29.0 33 87.88 3 Y 26.0 29 89.66 3 Y 26.0 28 92.86 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 26.7 33 80.91 3 Y 23.6 29 81.38 3 Y 23.7 28 84.64 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 23.3 33 70.51 3 Y 20.5 29 70.80 3 Y 19.2 28 68.57 3 Y
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 32.2 33 97.58 3 Y 27.4 29 94.48 3 Y 25.4 28 90.71 3 Y
33 41810035 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
31.4 33 95.15 3 Y 25.3 29 87.24 3 Y 21.8 28 77.86 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 17.9 33 54.14 2 N 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 20.5 28 73.21 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.7 33 89.90 3 Y 26.8 29 92.53 3 Y 26.5 28 94.64 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 32.3 33 97.98 3 Y 26.7 29 91.95 3 Y 24.0 28 85.71 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 25.2 33 76.46 3 Y 22.7 29 78.16 3 Y 22.1 28 78.93 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 14.6 33 44.24 1 N 14.0 29 48.28 1 N 15.4 28 55.00 2 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 26.0 33 78.69 3 Y 21.0 29 72.53 3 Y 19.0 28 67.86 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 19.5 33 59.19 2 N 19.6 29 67.47 3 Y 20.9 28 74.64 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 17.2 33 52.12 2 N 16.6 29 57.24 2 N 18.2 28 65.00 3 Y
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 16.4 33 49.80 1 N 14.8 29 51.03 2 N 14.3 28 50.95 2 N
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 21.8 33 65.96 3 Y 18.5 29 63.68 3 Y 17.3 28 61.67 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 18.3 33 55.45 2 N 15.7 29 54.14 2 N 14.5 28 51.79 2 N
45 41810047 Archana Saini 20.2 33 61.31 3 Y 18.0 29 62.07 3 Y 17.3 28 61.67 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 20.1 33 60.81 3 Y 17.8 29 61.38 3 Y 17.1 28 61.19 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 18.0 33 54.65 2 N 16.0 29 55.17 2 N 15.5 28 55.24 2 N
Average 2.66 2.72 2.79
Department of Business Administration Page 99
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.66 74.47 17.02 8.51
CO2 2.72 78.72 14.89 6.38
CO3 2.79 82.98 12.77 4.26
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target level
of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 74.5 74.47 74.5 49.6
CO2 78.7 78.72 78.7 52.5
CO3 83.0 82.98 55.3 83.0
Avg 79 69.5 61.7
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 68.9 68.89 68.9 45.9
CO2 66.7 66.67 66.7 44.4
CO3 51.1 51.11 34.1 51.1
Avg 62 56.5 47.2
Department of Business Administration Page 100
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.7 91.67 91.7 61.1
CO2 91.7 91.67 91.7 61.1
CO3 95.8 95.83 63.9 95.8
Avg 93 82.4 72.7
Subject Name & Code: Computer Applications in Management MBA-115
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
Computer
Applications in
Management
(CAM115)
CO1 Will have a better understanding of various statistical
packages and their usage
CO2 Ability to understand the data and its analysis aiding
to decision making
CO3 Ability to work on the practical office problems
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
CAM 115
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 CAM 115
PO2 CAM 115
PO3
PO4
PO5 CAM 115
Department of Business Administration Page 101
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3
CO2 3
CO3 2 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 102
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 32.4 36 90.00 3 Y 25.7 28 91.79 3 Y 23.9 26 91.92 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 27.4 36 76.11 3 Y 20.9 28 74.52 3 Y 18.7 26 72.05 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 27.1 36 75.19 3 Y 20.0 28 71.55 3 Y 17.9 26 68.85 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 27.9 36 77.50 3 Y 21.5 28 76.61 3 Y 19.7 26 75.58 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 26.8 36 74.54 3 Y 20.8 28 74.40 3 Y 19.3 26 74.36 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 23.2 36 64.54 3 Y 17.8 28 63.51 3 Y 16.0 26 61.47 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 20.8 36 57.87 2 N 15.5 28 55.36 2 N 13.7 26 52.56 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 24.9 36 69.17 3 Y 19.3 28 68.87 3 Y 17.8 26 68.53 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 17.2 36 47.69 1 N 12.4 28 44.35 1 N 11.4 26 43.91 1 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 26.1 36 72.41 3 Y 19.9 28 70.95 3 Y 18.1 26 69.49 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 12.3 36 34.26 1 N 9.0 28 32.14 1 N 7.7 26 29.49 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.7 36 62.96 3 Y 16.1 28 57.44 2 N 14.3 26 54.81 2 N
13 41810015 Vani 18.8 36 52.31 2 N 13.8 28 49.40 1 N 12.3 26 47.44 1 N
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 21.0 36 58.24 2 N 15.8 28 56.49 2 N 14.2 26 54.68 2 N
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 20.5 36 56.94 2 N 15.3 28 54.76 2 N 14.2 26 54.49 2 N
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 23.2 36 64.35 3 Y 17.7 28 63.10 3 Y 16.2 26 62.18 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 21.7 36 60.19 3 Y 16.9 28 60.42 3 Y 15.4 26 59.29 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 13.7 36 37.96 1 N 10.7 28 38.10 1 N 9.7 26 37.18 1 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 24.1 36 67.04 3 Y 18.7 28 66.90 3 Y 17.1 26 65.90 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 20.3 36 56.30 2 N 15.1 28 54.05 2 N 13.6 26 52.31 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 27.6 36 76.57 3 Y 21.0 28 74.82 3 Y 19.5 26 74.94 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 26.1 36 72.59 3 Y 19.4 28 69.29 3 Y 17.5 26 67.18 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 18.1 36 50.28 2 N 14.4 28 51.37 2 N 13.5 26 51.99 2 N
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 16.6 36 46.11 1 N 12.6 28 45.12 1 N 11.8 26 45.26 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 103
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 18.2 36 50.46 2 N 13.8 28 49.40 1 N 12.0 26 46.15 1 N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 21.3 36 59.26 2 N 17.4 28 62.20 3 Y 16.3 26 62.50 3 Y
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 22.8 36 63.33 3 Y 17.1 28 60.95 3 Y 15.1 26 58.21 2 N
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 15.3 36 42.41 1 N 12.0 28 42.74 1 N 10.8 26 41.41 1 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 24.6 36 68.43 3 Y 18.7 28 66.61 3 Y 16.7 26 64.29 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 23.1 36 64.07 3 Y 18.7 28 66.79 3 Y 17.2 26 66.28 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 21.0 36 58.24 2 N 15.5 28 55.30 2 N 13.6 26 52.12 2 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 18.2 36 50.56 2 N 14.9 28 53.33 2 N 13.9 26 53.33 2 N
33 41810035 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
16.5 36 45.83 1 N 14.0 28 50.00 1 N 12.5 26 48.08 1 N
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 23.7 36 65.74 3 Y 17.9 28 63.99 3 Y 16.4 26 63.14 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 16.5 36 45.83 1 N 14.0 28 50.00 1 N 12.5 26 48.08 1 N
36 41810038 Shivani 28.2 36 78.43 3 Y 21.0 28 74.82 3 Y 18.8 26 72.37 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 20.4 36 56.67 2 N 16.7 28 59.64 2 N 14.9 26 57.31 2 N
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 17.3 36 47.96 1 N 13.3 28 47.50 1 N 12.4 26 47.82 1 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 17.0 36 47.22 1 N 13.7 28 48.81 1 N 12.3 26 47.44 1 N
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 21.5 36 59.72 2 N 16.8 28 60.12 3 Y 15.7 26 60.26 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 13.7 36 37.96 1 N 10.3 28 36.90 1 N 9.0 26 34.62 1 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 19.6 36 54.44 2 N 14.5 28 51.67 2 N 12.9 26 49.74 1 N
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 20.8 36 57.87 2 N 16.2 28 57.74 2 N 15.0 26 57.69 2 N
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 22.1 36 61.48 3 Y 16.7 28 59.76 2 N 15.1 26 58.21 2 N
45 41810047 Archana Saini 26.5 36 73.52 3 Y 20.6 28 73.45 3 Y 19.0 26 72.95 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 17.8 36 49.35 1 N 13.6 28 48.39 1 N 12.7 26 48.78 1 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 24.7 36 68.52 3 Y 18.8 28 66.96 3 Y 17.6 26 67.63 3 Y
Average 2.23 2.19 2.13
Department of Business Administration Page 104
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 2.23 46.81 29.79 23.40
CO2 2.19 46.81 25.53 27.66
CO3 2.13 42.55 27.66 29.79
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 46.8 46.81
46.8
CO2 46.8 46.81 46.8
CO3 42.6 42.55 28.4 42.6 28.4 Avg 45 38 44.7 28.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 82.2 82.22 0.0 82.2 0.0
CO2 84.4 84.44 84.4 0.0 0.0
CO3 68.9 68.89 45.9 68.9 45.9 Avg 79 65 75.6 45.9
Department of Business Administration Page 105
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 58.3 58.33 0.0 58.3 0.0
CO2 62.5 62.50 62.5 0.0 0.0
CO3 50.0 50.00 33.3 50.0 33.3 Avg 57 48 54.2 33.3
Subject Name & Code: Financial Management MBA-102
Process used for revising/redefining the POs :
We have defined departmental vision, mission and program educational objectives. In accordance
with these and the Graduate Attributes prescribed by NBA, the program outcomes are defined.
The actual program results are compared with the program outcomes (POs) and the reasons for the
inconsistencies, if any, are assessed and considered while redefining POs. The POs are redefined
on the following bases:
1. Interaction with senior student/alumni.
2. Discussion with the senior staff members of the department regarding POs.
3. According to revision of syllabus by institute.
4. Interaction with industry experts on their expectation.
5. Training and placement data.
6. Policies for government sector.
Methodology to define course outcome attainment levels
Methodology to calculate CO, PO Attainment:
Define CO’s for a course and check their quality
Do mapping of CO with PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Prepare CO alignment sheet and decide Grade scale as follows:
Grade scale
Marks Score
≤ 50% 1
>50% and ≤ 60% 2
>60% 3
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Department of Business Administration Page 106
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 102
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 102
PO2 MBA 102
PO3 MBA 102
PO4 MBA 102
PO5 MBA 102
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 1 1 1 1 1
CO2 3 3 1 3 2
CO3 3 3 2 3 3
Course Cos Course Outcomes
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 102)
CO1 Demonstrate an understanding of the overall role and
importance of the finance function.
CO2 To understand the various short/long term sources of fund
and their financing management.
CO3 Identify relevant cash flows, time value and appraisal
techniques of the capital budgeting projects.
Department of Business Administration Page 107
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 108
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM MO MM %
age
Score Y/N %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 19.6 31 20.9 30 69.56 3 Y 67.24 3 Y 20.9 30 69.56 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 22.3 31 23.7 30 78.89 3 Y 75.98 3 Y 23.7 30 78.89 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 16.2 31 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y 59.89 3 Y 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 15.2 31 13.8 30 45.89 2 N 48.51 2 N 13.8 30 45.89 2 N
5 41810005 Himani 20.4 31 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y 68.62 3 Y 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam
Upadhyay
15.5 31 16.1 30 53.56 3 Y 53.33 3 Y 16.1 30 53.56 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika
Bansal
15.0 31 15.3 30 50.89 3 Y 50.69 3 Y 15.3 30 50.89 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid 14.9 31 15.3 30 50.89 3 Y 51.03 3 Y 15.3 30 50.89 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 13.6 31 14.7 30 49.00 2 N 47.36 2 N 14.7 30 49.00 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya
Kumar
13.8 31 16.4 30 54.56 3 Y 51.03 3 Y 16.4 30 54.56 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 12.6 31 12.9 30 43.11 2 N 42.87 2 N 12.9 30 43.11 2 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 15.6 31 17.5 30 58.44 3 Y 54.83 3 Y 17.5 30 58.44 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 14.5 31 16.3 30 54.33 3 Y 52.30 3 Y 16.3 30 54.33 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash
Singhal
18.7 31 19.0 30 63.22 3 Y 63.22 3 Y 19.0 30 63.22 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 15.0 31 18.6 30 62.00 3 Y 56.44 3 Y 18.6 30 62.00 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 19.1 31 21.6 30 71.89 3 Y 66.78 3 Y 21.6 30 71.89 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 12.6 31 13.6 30 45.33 2 N 44.02 2 N 13.6 30 45.33 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 13.4 31 12.9 30 42.89 2 N 43.79 2 N 12.9 30 42.89 2 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 22.3 31 23.7 30 79.00 3 Y 75.98 3 Y 23.7 30 79.00 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima
Purohit
15.0 31 15.9 30 53.11 3 Y 51.84 3 Y 15.9 30 53.11 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham
Singh
14.6 31 15.8 30 52.56 3 Y 50.34 3 Y 15.8 30 52.56 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 16.6 31 15.8 30 52.67 3 Y 53.68 3 Y 15.8 30 52.67 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek
Gupta
13.6 31 16.0 30 53.44 3 Y 49.66 2 N 16.0 30 53.44 3 Y
24 41810027 Siddharth
Kumar
0.0 31 0.0 30 0.00 1 N 0.00 1 N 0.0 30 0.00 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 109
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM MO MM %
age
Score Y/N %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
25 41810028 Ravish Garg 14.5 31 11.8 30 39.33 1 N 43.79 2 N 11.8 30 39.33 1 N
26 41810029 Nishant Sethi 15.2 31 12.9 30 43.11 2 N 47.82 2 N 12.9 30 43.11 2 N
27 41810030 Diksha Singh 14.9 31 14.6 30 48.78 2 N 49.89 2 N 14.6 30 48.78 2 N
28 41810031 Palak Gupta 12.1 31 12.8 30 42.67 2 N 41.72 2 N 12.8 30 42.67 2 N
29 41810032 Swati Arora 15.8 31 18.0 30 60.00 3 Y 55.75 3 Y 18.0 30 60.00 3 Y
30 41810033 Megha 19.7 31 19.4 30 64.67 3 Y 65.06 3 Y 19.4 30 64.67 3 Y
31 41810034 Anuj Kumar 10.1 31 12.8 30 42.56 2 N 38.39 1 N 12.8 30 42.56 2 N
32 41810035 Manish Tiwari 20.0 31 17.7 30 59.00 3 Y 62.99 3 Y 17.7 30 59.00 3 Y
33 41810036 Amit
Bhattacharjee
13.3 31 14.9 30 49.67 2 N 47.59 2 N 14.9 30 49.67 2 N
34 41810037 Ajay 15.9 31 16.4 30 54.56 3 Y 54.37 3 Y 16.4 30 54.56 3 Y
35 41810038 Shivani 12.4 31 14.6 30 48.56 2 N 44.94 2 N 14.6 30 48.56 2 N
36 41810039 Bhawana 23.0 31 23.0 30 76.56 3 Y 76.09 3 Y 23.0 30 76.56 3 Y
37 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 19.5 31 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y 64.14 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
38 41810041 Meghav
Sharma
11.7 31 12.5 30 41.67 2 N 40.69 2 N 12.5 30 41.67 2 N
39 41810042 Shaleen
Anand
16.4 31 17.8 30 59.44 3 Y 57.82 3 Y 17.8 30 59.44 3 Y
40 41810043 Karamveer
Singh
16.1 31 15.7 30 52.22 3 Y 52.53 3 Y 15.7 30 52.22 3 Y
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 13.8 31 9.7 30 32.33 1 N 39.54 1 N 9.7 30 32.33 1 N
42 41810045 Priyanka
Mehta
14.4 31 14.6 30 48.78 2 N 48.28 2 N 14.6 30 48.78 2 N
43 41810046 Abhinn
Sharma
14.8 31 16.3 30 54.22 3 Y 51.61 3 Y 16.3 30 54.22 3 Y
44 41810047 Archana Saini 19.6 31 18.9 30 63.00 3 Y 63.79 3 Y 18.9 30 63.00 3 Y
45 41810048 Mohit
Bhambhani
13.7 31 14.5 30 48.44 2 N 47.47 2 N 14.5 30 48.44 2 N
46 41810049 Supriya Dogra 12.5 31 13.8 30 45.89 2 N 43.91 2 N 13.8 30 45.89 2 N
Average 2.17
2.67 2.17
Department of Business Administration Page 110
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.30
40.43 48.94 10.64
CO2 2.53
59.57 34.04 6.38
CO3 2.55
61.70 31.91 6.38
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 40.4 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5
CO2 59.6 59.6 59.6 19.9 59.6 39.7
CO3 61.7 61.7 61.7 41.1 61.7 61.7
Avg. 53.9 45 44.9 24.8 44.9 38.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 93.3 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1
CO2 93.3 93.3 93.3 31.1 93.3 62.2
CO3 93.3 93.3 93.3 62.2 93.3 93.3
Avg. 93.3 73 72.6 41.5 72.6 62.2
Department of Business Administration Page 111
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.5 29.2 29.2 29.2 29.2 29.2
CO2 97.9 97.9 97.9 32.6 97.9 65.3
CO3 97.9 97.9 97.9 65.3 97.9 97.9
Avg. 94.43 75 75.0 42.4 75.0 64.1
Subject Name & Code: Human Resource Management MBA-104
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-104
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-104
PO2 MBA-104
PO3 MBA-104
PO4 MBA-104
PO5 MBA-104
Course Cos Course Outcomes
HUMAN
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-104)
CO1 Develop a comprehensive knowledge of issues affecting the
employer-employee relationship.
CO2 Able to understand appropriate organizational HRM practices
and be familiar with each element’s key concepts and
terminology.
CO3 Capable to apply the principles and techniques of human
resource management gained through this course to the
discussion of major personnel issues
Department of Business Administration Page 112
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2 3 3
CO2 3 2 3 3 2
CO3 3 2 2 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 113
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 31.4 33 71.52 3 Y 18.6 29 64.14 3 Y 15.8 28 56.43 2 N
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 30.3 33 72.53 3 Y 21.4 29 73.68 3 Y 20.7 28 73.93 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 31.6 33 67.88 3 Y 19.4 29 66.78 3 Y 18.2 28 65.12 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 21.5 33 64.24 3 Y 18.8 29 64.83 3 Y 18.0 28 64.29 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 33.5 33 81.21 3 Y 24.1 29 83.10 3 Y 23.6 28 84.29 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 26.5 33 60.40 3 Y 17.9 29 61.61 3 Y 17.2 28 61.43 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 21.5 33 61.41 3 Y 17.7 29 61.03 3 Y 16.5 28 59.05 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 26.8 33 65.25 3 Y 19.6 29 67.70 3 Y 19.3 28 69.05 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 20.2 33 57.98 2 N 16.0 29 55.17 2 N 14.4 28 51.31 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 21.0 33 65.86 3 Y 18.7 29 64.48 3 Y 17.6 28 62.74 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 16.6 33 54.95 2 N 16.2 29 55.75 2 N 15.7 28 56.07 2 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.7 33 70.51 3 Y 21.1 29 72.76 3 Y 21.1 28 75.48 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 30.0 33 63.43 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 17.6 28 62.98 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 26.8 33 49.70 1 N 14.0 29 48.39 1 N 12.6 28 44.88 1 N
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 25.8 33 66.67 3 Y 18.7 29 64.60 3 Y 17.3 28 61.67 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 29.5 33 74.14 3 Y 21.1 29 72.76 3 Y 19.4 28 69.40 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 24.3 33 55.15 2 N 16.0 29 55.06 2 N 15.3 28 54.76 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 21.6 33 51.31 2 N 14.3 29 49.20 1 N 12.8 28 45.71 1 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 28.0 33 56.16 2 N 16.0 29 55.06 2 N 14.5 28 51.79 2 N
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 19.1 33 62.42 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 16.4 28 58.45 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 23.4 33 57.78 2 N 16.2 29 55.86 2 N 14.7 28 52.62 2 N
22 41810024 Radhika 27.5 33 58.48 2 N 16.4 29 56.44 2 N 15.3 28 54.76 2 N
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 16.9 33 60.20 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 19.5 28 69.64 3 Y
24 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 21.4 33 44.65 1 N 11.9 29 40.92 1 N 9.9 28 35.36 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 114
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
25 41810028 Ravish Garg 20.0 33 39.60 1 N 12.5 29 43.22 1 N 12.4 28 44.29 1 N
26 41810029 Nishant Sethi 23.5 33 59.49 2 N 15.7 29 54.14 2 N 13.2 28 47.02 1 N
27 41810030 Diksha Singh 16.4 33 44.34 1 N 13.3 29 45.86 1 N 12.6 28 44.88 1 N
28 41810031 Palak Gupta 28.0 33 64.65 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 19.9 28 71.19 3 Y
29 41810032 Swati Arora 23.0 33 71.72 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 20.8 28 74.40 3 Y
30 41810033 Megha 5.8 33 59.60 2 N 15.7 29 54.25 2 N 13.1 28 46.79 1 N
31 41810034 Anuj Kumar 20.9 33 46.46 1 N 15.1 29 51.95 2 N 15.6 28 55.71 2 N
32 41810035 Manish Kumar Tiwari 23.4 33 54.75 2 N 14.9 29 51.26 2 N 12.6 28 44.88 1 N
33 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 23.0 33 54.55 2 N 15.7 29 54.25 2 N 14.3 28 50.95 2 N
34 41810037 Ajay 29.4 33 68.69 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 18.6 28 66.43 3 Y
35 41810038 Shivani 29.7 33 68.08 3 Y 18.8 29 64.94 3 Y 17.2 28 61.43 3 Y
36 41810039 Bhawana 20.7 33 53.74 2 N 15.4 29 52.99 2 N 13.9 28 49.64 1 N
37 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 14.9 33 52.93 2 N 14.0 29 48.28 1 N 11.5 28 41.19 1 N
38 41810041 Meghav Sharma 27.1 33 63.43 3 Y 18.2 29 62.76 3 Y 16.4 28 58.45 2 N
39 41810042 Shaleen Anand 27.4 33 65.86 3 Y 17.8 29 61.38 3 Y 15.0 28 53.45 2 N
40 41810043 Karamveer Singh 16.5 33 45.66 1 N 12.9 29 44.37 1 N 11.1 28 39.52 1 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.9 33 52.32 2 N 13.9 29 48.05 1 N 11.3 28 40.36 1 N
41 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 29.1 33 69.49 3 Y 18.9 29 65.29 3 Y 17.1 28 61.19 3 Y
43 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 19.5 33 68.69 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 18.6 28 66.43 3 Y
44 41810047 Archana Saini 23.0 33 54.95 2 N 15.3 29 52.87 2 N 13.5 28 48.33 1 N
45 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 19.0 33 60.61 3 Y 16.2 29 55.98 2 N 13.8 28 49.17 1 N
46 41810049 Supriya Dogra 27.6 33 50.91 2 N 15.3 29 52.87 2 N 14.9 28 53.10 2 N
Average 2.39 2.33 2.09
Department of Business Administration Page 115
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.39 52.17 34.78 13.04
CO2 2.33 50.00 32.61 17.39
CO3 2.09 39.13 30.43 30.43
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 52.2 52.17 34.8 34.8 34.8 52.2 52.2
CO2 50.0 50.00 50.0 33.3 50.0 50.0 33.3
CO3 39.1 39.13 39.1 26.1 26.1 39.1 39.1 Avg 47 41 31.4 37.0 47.1 41.5
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 77.8 77.78 51.9 51.9 51.9 77.8 77.8
CO2 77.8 77.78 77.8 51.9 77.8 77.8 51.9
CO3 77.8 77.78 77.8 51.9 51.9 77.8 77.8 Avg 78 69 51.9 60.5 77.8 69.1
Department of Business Administration Page 116
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.7 91.67 61.1 61.1 61.1 91.7 91.7
CO2 95.8 95.83 95.8 63.9 95.8 95.8 63.9
CO3 89.6 89.58 89.6 59.7 59.7 89.6 89.6 Avg 92 82 61.6 72.2 92.4 81.7
Subject Name & Code: Production & Operations Management MBA 106
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
PRODUCTION AND
OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT
(POM106)
CO1 Understand the elements of operations management and
various transformation processes to enhance productivity
and competitiveness
CO2 Be able to understand the characteristics of different types
of decision-making environments and the appropriate
decision making approaches
CO3 Be able to build and solve Linear Programming Problems,
Transportation Models and Assignment Models.
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
POM 106
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 POM 106
PO2 POM 106
PO3
PO4
PO5
Department of Business Administration Page 117
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3
CO2 3
CO3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 118
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41810001 VipinTyagi 28.9 33 87.68 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
2 41810002 VibhuSagar 26.1 33 79.19 3 Y 23.5 29 81.03 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 27.2 33 82.42 3 Y 24.1 29 83.22 3 Y 23.7 28 84.52 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 28.6 33 86.67 3 Y 25.5 29 88.05 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 31.9 33 96.77 3 Y 28.0 29 96.67 3 Y 27.0 28 96.55 3 Y
6 41810006 ShivamUpadhyay 25.1 33 75.96 3 Y 22.9 29 78.85 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 27.0 33 81.72 3 Y 24.5 29 84.37 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid
Ahmed
26.3 33 79.60 3 Y 23.4 29 80.80 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 28.0 33 84.95 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 24.2 28 86.43 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 23.7 33 71.92 3 Y 21.9 29 75.40 3 Y 22.4 28 80.00 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 25.6 33 77.58 3 Y 22.6 29 77.93 3 Y 21.8 28 77.86 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 28.6 33 86.57 3 Y 25.2 29 86.78 3 Y 24.3 28 86.67 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 27.8 33 84.14 3 Y 24.2 29 83.56 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
14 41810016 AakashSinghal 29.9 33 90.71 3 Y 26.5 29 91.49 3 Y 25.5 28 91.19 3 Y
15 41810017 SonaliGoel 27.8 33 84.24 3 Y 24.9 29 85.98 3 Y 24.3 28 86.67 3 Y
16 41810018 ChahatPundir 29.0 33 87.78 3 Y 25.5 29 87.82 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 22.8 33 69.09 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
18 41810020 YuktiKaul 23.5 33 71.11 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 27.5 33 83.23 3 Y 23.8 29 82.18 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
20 41810022 MadhurimaPurohit 29.4 33 88.99 3 Y 25.8 29 88.85 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 28.4 33 86.06 3 Y 25.0 29 86.32 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 27.6 33 83.74 3 Y 24.0 29 82.64 3 Y 22.4 28 80.00 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 28.6 33 86.57 3 Y 25.5 29 87.93 3 Y 24.9 28 89.05 3 Y
24 41810026 NishithKhare 0.0 33 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 28 0.00 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 119
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
25 41810027 SiddharthKumar 28.7 33 86.87 3 Y 24.7 29 85.29 3 Y 23.6 28 84.29 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 24.0 33 72.63 3 Y 22.2 29 76.55 3 Y 22.8 28 81.55 3 Y
27 41810029 NishantSethi 28.3 33 85.76 3 Y 25.1 29 86.67 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 23.2 33 70.30 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 26.0 33 78.89 3 Y 23.6 29 81.38 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 26.5 33 80.40 3 Y 23.5 29 80.92 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 29.6 33 89.80 3 Y 25.1 29 86.67 3 Y 23.2 28 82.98 3 Y
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 23.9 33 72.32 3 Y 22.3 29 76.90 3 Y 22.8 28 81.55 3 Y
33 41810035 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
22.7 33 68.69 3 Y 20.9 29 72.07 3 Y 21.4 28 76.55 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit
Bhattacharjee
25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.6 33 89.80 3 Y 25.8 29 88.97 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 28.7 33 86.97 3 Y 25.4 29 87.70 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 26.1 33 79.19 3 Y 23.5 29 81.03 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 24.7 33 74.85 3 Y 22.3 29 76.78 3 Y 22.0 28 78.69 3 Y
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 25.9 33 78.48 3 Y 23.2 29 79.89 3 Y 22.9 28 81.90 3 Y
40 41810042 ShaleenAnand 26.8 33 81.31 3 Y 24.2 29 83.45 3 Y 24.0 28 85.60 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 26.4 33 80.10 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 21.5 28 76.79 3 Y
41 41810044 KumariPriya 26.7 33 80.81 3 Y 23.7 29 81.84 3 Y 23.6 28 84.29 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 28.7 33 86.97 3 Y 25.4 29 87.70 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 28.3 33 85.66 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 24.0 28 85.60 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
46 41810048 MohitBhambhani 25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 26.9 33 81.62 3 Y 23.3 29 80.23 3 Y 21.8 28 77.86 3 Y
Average 2.96 2.96 2.96
Department of Business Administration Page 120
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
CO2 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
CO3 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 48.9 48.94 48.9 0.0
CO2 40.4 40.43 0.0 40.4
CO3 40.4 40.43 0.0 40.4 Avg 43 48.9 40.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 40.0 40.00 40.0 0.0
CO2 40.0 40.00 0.0 40.0
CO3 40.0 40.00 0.0 40.0 Avg 40 40.0 40.0
Department of Business Administration Page 121
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target
level of
CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.4 85.42 85.4 0.0
CO2 93.8 93.75 0.0 93.8
CO3 91.7 91.67 0.0 91.7 Avg 90 85.4 92.7
Subject Name & Code: Marketing Management MBA-108
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO
mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and
employer survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
MARKETING
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 108)
CO1 Comprehensive and practical introduction to marketing
management.
CO2 Improved ability to make effective marketing decisions,
including assessing marketing opportunities and developing
marketing strategies and implementation plans.
CO3 Students gain significant experience in communicating and
defending their marketing recommendations.
Department of Business Administration Page 122
MBA 108
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 108
PO2 MBA 108
PO3 MBA 108
PO4 MBA 108
PO5 MBA 108
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 1 2
CO2 3 1 2 1 2
CO3 3 2 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 123
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 22.3 31 71.94 3 Y 21.0 29 72.53 3 Y 21.7 30 72.22 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 22.0 31 71.08 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 23.7 30 78.89 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 22.5 29 77.47 3 Y 23.9 30 79.78 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 18.1 31 58.49 2 N 16.4 29 56.67 2 N 15.9 30 53.11 2 N
5 41810005 Himani 25.1 31 81.08 3 Y 24.3 29 83.68 3 Y 25.6 30 85.33 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 22.7 31 73.23 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 23.0 30 76.56 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 19.2 31 62.04 3 Y 18.7 29 64.48 3 Y 19.6 30 65.22 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 19.1 29 65.75 3 Y 20.1 30 66.89 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 18.9 31 60.97 3 Y 16.9 29 58.28 2 N 16.7 30 55.67 2 N
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 21.4 31 69.14 3 Y 20.2 29 69.54 3 Y 21.4 30 71.33 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 17.7 31 57.10 2 N 15.3 29 52.64 2 N 14.5 30 48.44 1 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.5 31 72.69 3 Y 22.2 29 76.44 3 Y 24.3 30 81.00 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 22.0 31 70.97 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 23.1 30 77.00 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 20.4 31 65.91 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 18.1 30 60.44 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 21.2 31 68.49 3 Y 20.6 29 71.03 3 Y 21.7 30 72.22 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 22.2 29 76.55 3 Y 22.5 30 75.00 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 12.8 31 41.18 1 N 13.5 29 46.44 1 N 14.8 30 49.22 1 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 19.3 31 62.26 3 Y 15.7 29 54.14 2 N 14.0 30 46.67 1 N
19 41810021 Divam Jain 21.2 31 68.39 3 Y 19.9 29 68.62 3 Y 20.9 30 69.67 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 19.3 31 62.26 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.7 30 62.22 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 22.1 31 71.29 3 Y 19.8 29 68.28 3 Y 20.1 30 67.00 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 20.6 31 66.56 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 21.1 30 70.44 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 20.5 31 66.24 3 Y 18.6 29 64.02 3 Y 18.4 30 61.33 3 Y
24 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 3 Y 19.1 30 63.56 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 124
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
25 41810028 Ravish Garg 16.8 31 54.09 2 N 14.4 29 49.66 1 N 13.8 30 46.11 1 N
26 41810029 Nishant Sethi 18.8 31 60.65 3 Y 17.1 29 58.97 2 N 17.1 30 57.00 2 N
27 41810030 Diksha Singh 19.3 31 62.26 3 Y 16.3 29 56.21 2 N 15.4 30 51.33 2 N
28 41810031 Palak Gupta 18.8 31 60.54 3 Y 16.9 29 58.16 2 N 16.9 30 56.22 2 N
29 41810032 Swati Arora 20.3 31 65.48 3 Y 20.4 29 70.34 3 Y 22.3 30 74.33 3 Y
30 41810033 Megha 19.4 31 62.58 3 Y 15.9 29 54.71 2 N 14.7 30 49.11 1 N
31 41810034 Anuj Kumar 21.6 31 69.57 3 Y 19.4 29 67.01 3 Y 19.5 30 65.00 3 Y
32 41810035 Manish Tiwari 15.9 31 51.18 2 N 16.6 29 57.36 2 N 18.5 30 61.67 3 Y
33 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 20.3 31 65.48 3 Y 19.1 29 65.98 3 Y 19.6 30 65.22 3 Y
34 41810037 Ajay 23.7 31 76.45 3 Y 22.0 29 75.98 3 Y 22.8 30 75.89 3 Y
35 41810038 Shivani 19.9 31 64.09 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 3 Y 19.0 30 63.22 3 Y
36 41810039 Bhawana 17.8 31 57.53 2 N 16.5 29 56.90 2 N 17.2 30 57.22 2 N
37 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 20.7 31 66.67 3 Y 19.1 29 65.75 3 Y 19.8 30 65.89 3 Y
38 41810041 Meghav Sharma 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 18.4 29 63.45 3 Y 18.7 30 62.44 3 Y
39 41810042 Shaleen Anand 17.5 31 56.34 2 N 16.5 29 56.90 2 N 17.0 30 56.78 2 N
40 41810043 Karamveer Singh 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 18.3 29 62.99 3 Y 18.9 30 62.89 3 Y
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.7 31 66.67 3 Y 19.3 29 66.55 3 Y 20.0 30 66.78 3 Y
42 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 19.5 31 62.90 3 Y 19.8 29 68.28 3 Y 21.7 30 72.33 3 Y
43 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 20.7 31 66.77 3 Y 19.9 29 68.51 3 Y 20.9 30 69.78 3 Y
44 41810047 Archana Saini 17.6 31 56.77 2 N 16.2 29 55.86 2 N 16.2 30 54.00 2 N
45 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 17.8 29 61.49 3 Y 17.4 30 58.00 2 N
46 41810049 Supriya Dogra 19.0 31 61.18 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 19.9 30 66.33 3 Y
Average 2.80 2.65 2.59
Department of Business Administration Page 125
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.80 82.61 15.22 2.17
CO2 2.65 69.57 26.09 4.35
CO3 2.59 69.57 19.57 10.87
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 82.6 82.61 82.6 0.0 55.1 27.5 55.1
CO2 69.6 69.57 69.6 23.2 46.4 23.2 46.4
CO3 69.6 69.57 69.6 0.0 46.4 46.4 46.4 Avg 74 74 23.2 49.3 32.4 49.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 65.9 65.91 65.9 0.0 43.9 22.0 43.9
CO2 63.6 63.64 63.6 21.2 42.4 21.2 42.4
CO3 59.1 59.09 59.1 0.0 39.4 39.4 39.4 Avg 63 63 21.2 41.9 27.5 41.9
Department of Business Administration Page 126
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.9 97.92 97.9 0.0 65.3 32.6 65.3
CO2 97.9 97.92 97.9 32.6 65.3 32.6 65.3
CO3 89.6 89.58 89.6 0.0 59.7 59.7 59.7 Avg 95 95 32.6 63.4 41.7 63.4
Subject Name & Code: Total Quality Management MBA-110
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 110
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-110
PO2 MBA-110
PO3 MBA-110
PO4 MBA-110
PO5 MBA-110
Course Cos Course Outcomes
TOTAL QUALITY
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-110)
CO1 Understand the essential principles of Total Quality
Management and select suitable statistical techniques for
getting better processes
CO2 Help students to write reports to management telling
processes and advocating ways to look up them.
CO3 Ability to operate the methodologies, methods and tools of
Lean Manufacturing.
Department of Business Administration Page 127
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 3 2 2 2
CO2 3 2
CO3 2 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 128
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 27.1 31 87.53 3 Y 25.6 29 88.16 3 Y 26.3 30 87.67 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y 23.4 29 80.69 3 Y 24.5 30 81.78 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 25.5 31 82.26 3 Y 24.2 29 83.56 3 Y 25.3 30 84.22 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 23.8 31 76.77 3 Y 23.1 29 79.77 3 Y 24.1 30 80.22 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 27.5 31 88.82 3 Y 26.2 29 90.34 3 Y 27.3 30 90.89 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 22.2 31 71.61 3 Y 21.4 29 73.68 3 Y 21.9 30 73.11 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 22.3 29 76.90 3 Y 23.6 30 78.67 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid 26.2 31 84.52 3 Y 25.3 29 87.13 3 Y 26.5 30 88.44 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 21.7 31 69.89 3 Y 21.3 29 73.33 3 Y 22.1 30 73.56 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 23.4 31 75.48 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 21.8 30 72.56 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 17.3 31 55.81 2 N 15.9 29 54.94 2 N 15.8 30 52.56 2 N
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 27.2 31 87.85 3 Y 25.5 29 87.82 3 Y 26.3 30 87.67 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 27.2 31 87.85 3 Y 25.5 29 87.82 3 Y 26.3 30 87.67 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 23.5 31 75.81 3 Y 22.7 29 78.39 3 Y 23.8 30 79.22 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 23.2 31 74.84 3 Y 21.7 29 74.71 3 Y 22.1 30 73.78 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 26.3 31 84.84 3 Y 24.8 29 85.63 3 Y 25.9 30 86.22 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 20.0 31 64.62 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 21.7 30 72.33 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 21.4 31 69.14 3 Y 20.0 29 68.85 3 Y 20.6 30 68.67 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 25.8 31 83.23 3 Y 24.3 29 83.79 3 Y 24.9 30 83.00 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 23.0 29 79.31 3 Y 23.7 30 79.00 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 22.6 31 72.90 3 Y 21.4 29 73.91 3 Y 22.0 30 73.22 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 24.2 31 78.17 3 Y 22.7 29 78.39 3 Y 24.0 30 80.11 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 22.6 31 73.01 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 23.0 30 76.56 3 Y
24 41810026 3.2 31 10.32 1 N 2.0 29 6.90 1 N 0.8 30 2.67 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 19.7 31 63.55 3 Y 17.6 29 60.69 3 Y 17.7 30 59.00 2 N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 18.9 31 61.08 3 Y 15.8 29 54.48 2 N 14.3 30 47.56 1 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 22.6 31 72.90 3 Y 21.6 29 74.37 3 Y 21.8 30 72.78 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 21.2 31 68.39 3 Y 21.0 29 72.53 3 Y 22.8 30 75.89 3 Y
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 22.8 31 73.66 3 Y 22.2 29 76.44 3 Y 23.0 30 76.67 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 23.2 31 74.84 3 Y 22.3 29 77.01 3 Y 23.5 30 78.22 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 129
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
31 41810033 Megha 23.8 31 76.77 3 Y 21.5 29 74.02 3 Y 20.7 30 69.11 3 Y
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 22.7 31 73.12 3 Y 21.3 29 73.56 3 Y 22.0 30 73.33 3 Y
33 41810035 Manish Tiwari 18.1 31 58.28 2 N 18.1 29 62.41 3 Y 18.8 30 62.78 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 21.3 31 68.82 3 Y 20.7 29 71.49 3 Y 21.9 30 73.11 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 23.0 29 79.31 3 Y 23.7 30 79.00 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 21.8 31 70.32 3 Y 21.3 29 73.45 3 Y 21.9 30 73.00 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 22.1 31 71.29 3 Y 21.3 29 73.56 3 Y 22.6 30 75.22 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 24.2 31 77.96 3 Y 21.6 29 74.60 3 Y 21.2 30 70.67 3 Y
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 19.1 31 61.51 3 Y 18.8 29 64.94 3 Y 20.1 30 67.00 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 21.3 31 68.60 3 Y 21.3 29 73.45 3 Y 22.4 30 74.78 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 19.8 31 63.98 3 Y 18.0 29 61.95 3 Y 18.2 30 60.67 3 Y
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 22.2 31 71.72 3 Y 21.2 29 73.22 3 Y 22.5 30 75.11 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 23.0 31 74.19 3 Y 22.5 29 77.70 3 Y 23.5 30 78.22 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 22.5 31 72.69 3 Y 22.0 29 75.75 3 Y 23.5 30 78.33 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 20.3 31 65.59 3 Y 20.3 29 70.11 3 Y 21.3 30 71.11 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 22.7 31 73.12 3 Y 20.0 29 68.97 3 Y 19.3 30 64.44 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 23.5 31 75.91 3 Y 22.9 29 78.85 3 Y 23.6 30 78.67 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 130
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.91 93.62 4.26 2.13
CO2 2.91 93.62 4.26 2.13
CO3 2.87 91.49 4.26 4.26
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 93.6 62.4 93.6 62.4 62.4 62.4
CO2 93.6 0.0 93.6 0.0 62.4 0.0
CO3 91.5 61.0 0.0 91.5 0.0 91.5
Avg. 93
62 93.6 77.0 62.4 77.0
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.1 60.7 91.1 60.7 60.7 60.7
CO2 91.1 0.0 91.1 0.0 60.7 0.0
CO3 91.1 60.7 0.0 91.1 0.0 91.1
Avg. 91 61 91.1 75.9 60.7 75.9
Department of Business Administration Page 131
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 66.7 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 66.7 0.0
CO3 100.0 66.7 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0
Avg. 100.0 67 100.0 83.3 66.7 83.3
Subject Name & Code: Business Ethics MBA-112
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-112
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-112
PO2 MBA-112
PO3 MBA-112
PO4 MBA-112
PO5 MBA-112
Course Cos Course Outcomes
BUSINESS ETHICS
(MBA-112)
CO-1401 Define, explain and illustrate the theoretical foundations of
business ethics.
CO-1402 Re-examine their knowledge of business and economic
concepts from an ethical perspective.
CO-1403 Apply and illustrate ethical and moral issues in business
decision making process.
Department of Business Administration Page 132
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 3 3 2
CO2 3 2 3 3 2
CO3 3 3 3 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 133
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 31.4 33 78.99 3 Y 22.4 29 77.13 3 Y 21.1 28 75.24 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 30.3 33 78.79 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 31.6 33 80.30 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 20.1 28 71.67 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 21.5 33 77.37 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 19.1 28 68.10 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 33.5 33 87.58 3 Y 24.5 29 84.48 3 Y 22.6 28 80.71 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 26.5 33 77.78 3 Y 21.2 29 73.22 3 Y 19.1 28 68.21 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 21.5 33 61.82 3 Y 17.7 29 61.03 3 Y 16.4 28 58.57 2 N
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 26.8 33 74.04 3 Y 20.9 29 72.07 3 Y 19.2 28 68.45 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 20.2 33 76.46 3 Y 22.0 29 75.86 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 21.0 33 74.04 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 20.2 28 72.02 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 16.6 33 62.83 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 17.1 28 61.19 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.7 33 80.20 3 Y 22.8 29 78.74 3 Y 21.7 28 77.50 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 30.0 33 82.32 3 Y 22.9 29 79.08 3 Y 21.4 28 76.43 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 26.8 33 62.73 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 17.4 28 62.02 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 25.8 33 80.00 3 Y 22.0 29 75.98 3 Y 20.1 28 71.67 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 29.5 33 85.56 3 Y 24.0 29 82.76 3 Y 22.3 28 79.52 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 24.3 33 62.83 3 Y 18.0 29 61.95 3 Y 16.3 28 58.21 2 N
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 21.6 33 66.57 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 18.3 28 65.48 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 28.0 33 78.59 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 20.1 28 71.90 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 19.1 33 62.63 3 Y 17.7 29 61.15 3 Y 16.1 28 57.50 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 23.4 33 66.46 3 Y 18.9 29 65.29 3 Y 17.6 28 62.98 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 27.5 33 74.34 3 Y 21.1 29 72.87 3 Y 19.8 28 70.83 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 16.9 33 65.56 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.2 28 68.45 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 17.5 33 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 28 0.00 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 21.4 33 49.09 1 N 14.5 29 50.11 2 N 14.3 28 50.95 2 N
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 20.0 33 43.74 1 N 13.5 29 46.44 1 N 13.1 28 46.79 1 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 23.5 33 66.26 3 Y 18.8 29 64.83 3 Y 17.3 28 61.90 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 16.4 33 54.34 2 N 16.3 29 56.09 2 N 15.8 28 56.43 2 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 28.0 33 79.60 3 Y 22.1 29 76.21 3 Y 20.1 28 71.90 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 23.0 33 84.34 3 Y 24.2 29 83.45 3 Y 23.0 28 82.02 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 5.8 33 44.85 1 N 14.7 29 50.57 2 N 16.0 28 57.26 2 N
Department of Business Administration Page 134
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 20.9 33 48.48 1 N 15.1 29 51.95 2 N 14.9 28 53.33 2 N
33 41810035 Manish Kumar Tiwari 23.4 33 65.35 3 Y 18.6 29 64.02 3 Y 17.4 28 62.02 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 23.0 33 58.99 2 N 17.9 29 61.84 3 Y 17.1 28 61.07 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.4 33 54.85 2 N 18.1 29 62.53 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 29.7 33 75.15 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 20.2 28 72.14 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 20.7 33 70.91 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 18.0 28 64.29 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 14.9 33 54.44 2 N 16.0 29 55.29 2 N 15.5 28 55.36 2 N
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 27.1 33 66.87 3 Y 19.1 29 65.86 3 Y 18.3 28 65.48 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 27.4 33 64.55 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.0 28 67.86 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 16.5 33 49.60 1 N 15.2 29 52.30 2 N 15.0 28 53.45 2 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.9 33 68.08 3 Y 19.3 29 66.67 3 Y 17.7 28 63.21 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 29.1 33 80.61 3 Y 22.4 29 77.36 3 Y 20.5 28 73.10 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 19.5 33 70.10 3 Y 20.9 29 72.18 3 Y 20.4 28 72.98 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 23.0 33 70.20 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 18.2 28 65.12 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 19.0 33 46.67 1 N 14.1 29 48.62 1 N 14.0 28 50.00 1 N
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 27.6 33 62.73 3 Y 18.1 29 62.41 3 Y 16.2 28 57.86 2 N
Average 2.62 2.74 2.66
Department of Business Administration Page 135
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.62 76.60 8.51 14.89
CO2 2.74 80.85 12.77 6.38
CO3 2.66 72.34 21.28 6.38
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 76.6 76.60 76.6 51.1 76.6 76.6 51.1
CO2 80.9 80.85 80.9 53.9 80.9 80.9 53.9
CO3 72.3 72.34 72.3 72.3 72.3 48.2 48.2 Avg 77 77 59.1 76.6 68.6 51.1
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 88.9 88.89 88.9 59.3 88.9 88.9 59.3
CO2 88.9 88.89 88.9 59.3 88.9 88.9 59.3
CO3 88.9 88.89 88.9 88.9 88.9 59.3 59.3 Avg 89 89 69.1 88.9 79.0 59.3
Department of Business Administration Page 136
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 81.3 81.25 81.3 54.2 81.3 81.3 54.2
CO2 97.9 97.92 97.9 65.3 97.9 97.9 65.3
CO3 97.9 97.92 97.9 97.9 97.9 65.3 65.3 Avg 92 92 72.5 92.4 81.5 61.6
Subject Name & Code: Research Methodology MBA-114
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
(MBA-114)
CO1 Develop understanding on research process, various kinds
of research and research designs
CO2 Basic understanding of data analysis and hypothesis testing
procedures
CO3 Adequate knowledge on measurement & scaling
techniques as well as the quantitative data analysis
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
RM 114
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 RM 114
PO2 RM 114
PO3
PO4
PO5
Department of Business Administration Page 137
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3
CO2 3
CO3 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 138
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2
CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 21.5 33 65.25 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 18.7 28 66.90 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 22.1 33 66.87 3 Y 20.5 29 70.57 3 Y 20.5 28 73.10 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 24.1 33 72.93 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 21.1 28 75.48 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 19.3 33 58.38 2 N 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 17.7 28 63.21 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 28.9 33 87.47 3 Y 24.9 29 85.86 3 Y 23.2 28 82.98 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam Upadhyay 20.6 33 62.42 3 Y 19.0 29 65.63 3 Y 18.4 28 65.60 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 21.0 33 63.64 3 Y 19.5 29 67.24 3 Y 19.5 28 69.64 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid Ahmed 20.5 33 62.02 3 Y 18.6 29 64.14 3 Y 17.9 28 64.05 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 19.6 33 59.39 2 N 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 19.0 28 67.74 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 22.2 33 67.27 3 Y 20.7 29 71.49 3 Y 21.1 28 75.24 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 18.8 33 56.97 2 N 17.5 29 60.34 3 Y 17.7 28 63.21 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 22.1 33 66.87 3 Y 20.5 29 70.57 3 Y 20.5 28 73.10 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 25.9 33 78.59 3 Y 22.7 29 78.28 3 Y 21.4 28 76.31 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 19.8 33 60.00 2 N 18.9 29 65.29 3 Y 19.3 28 68.81 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 22.5 33 68.08 3 Y 19.6 29 67.47 3 Y 19.0 28 67.74 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 23.3 33 70.51 3 Y 20.5 29 70.80 3 Y 19.2 28 68.57 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 20.2 33 61.21 3 Y 19.2 29 66.32 3 Y 19.6 28 69.88 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 16.4 33 49.70 1 N 16.2 29 55.86 2 N 17.4 28 62.14 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 23.7 33 71.72 3 Y 21.2 29 72.99 3 Y 20.2 28 72.02 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima Purohit 15.8 33 47.88 1 N 15.6 29 53.79 2 N 15.6 28 55.71 2 N
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 22.5 33 68.08 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 17.9 28 64.05 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 22.9 33 69.29 3 Y 21.1 29 72.64 3 Y 21.1 28 75.24 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 20.1 33 61.01 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 3 Y 19.2 28 68.57 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 0.0 33 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 28 0.00 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 18.2 33 55.15 2 N 17.4 29 60.00 2 N 17.4 28 62.14 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 13.0 33 39.39 1 N 13.0 29 44.83 1 N 13.0 28 46.43 1 N
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 17.2 33 52.12 2 N 15.6 29 53.79 2 N 16.2 28 57.86 2 N
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 15.3 33 46.46 1 N 15.2 29 52.53 2 N 16.4 28 58.69 2 N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 26.6 33 80.61 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 21.4 28 76.31 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 22.5 33 68.08 3 Y 20.8 29 71.61 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 139
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2
CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
31 41810033 Megha 15.6 33 47.27 1 N 11.4 29 39.31 1 N 9.0 28 32.14 1 N
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 14.7 33 44.65 1 N 15.1 29 52.18 2 N 16.1 28 57.62 2 N
33 41810035 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
18.4 33 55.76 2 N 17.2 29 59.31 2 N 17.4 28 62.14 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit Bhattacharjee 20.1 33 60.81 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 18.3 28 65.36 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 19.6 33 59.49 2 N 13.1 29 45.06 1 N 9.3 28 33.21 1 N
36 41810038 Shivani 25.8 33 78.18 3 Y 22.1 29 76.21 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 20.2 33 61.21 3 Y 18.6 29 64.02 3 Y 18.2 28 65.12 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 19.6 33 59.39 2 N 17.8 29 61.26 3 Y 17.6 28 62.98 3 Y
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 20.5 33 62.22 3 Y 18.5 29 63.68 3 Y 18.0 28 64.29 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 24.3 33 73.74 3 Y 22.3 29 77.01 3 Y 22.3 28 79.76 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 16.4 33 49.70 1 N 15.5 29 53.56 2 N 16.1 28 57.38 2 N
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 20.3 33 61.41 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 18.3 28 65.36 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 24.2 33 73.33 3 Y 21.7 29 74.94 3 Y 21.1 28 75.24 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 21.8 33 66.06 3 Y 21.1 29 72.76 3 Y 22.1 28 78.93 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 20.9 33 63.23 3 Y 19.6 29 67.47 3 Y 19.6 28 69.88 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 16.6 33 50.30 2 N 16.4 29 56.44 2 N 17.0 28 60.83 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 22.5 33 68.08 3 Y 20.8 29 71.61 3 Y 20.8 28 74.17 3 Y
Average 2.45 2.64 2.72
Department of Business Administration Page 140
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 2.45 61.70 21.28 17.02
CO2 2.64 72.34 19.15 8.51
CO3 2.72 80.85 10.64 8.51
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 61.7 61.70 61.7 0.0
CO2 72.3 72.34 0.0 72.3
CO3 80.9 80.85 80.9 80.9
Avg 72 71.3 76.6
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 80.0 80.00 80.0 0.0
CO2 80.0 80.00 0.0 80.0
CO3 77.8 77.78 77.8 77.8
Avg 79 78.9 78.9
Department of Business Administration Page 141
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.8 95.83 95.8
CO2 95.8 95.83 0.0 95.8
CO3 95.8 95.83 95.8 95.8
Avg 96 95.8 95.8
Subject Name & Code: Management Information System MBA 116
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (MIS-
116)
CO1 Understand the leadership role of Management Information Systems
in achieving business competitive advantage through informed
decision making.
CO2 Analyze and synthesize business information and systems to facilitate
evaluation of strategic alternatives.
CO3 Ability to design Information Systems for various functional areas of
management
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Department of Business Administration Page 142
MIS-116
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MIS 116
PO2 MIS 116
PO3
PO4 MIS 116
PO5 MIS 116
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 3
CO2 2
CO3 3 3 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 143
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41810001 Vipin Tyagi 28.9 33 87.68 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
2 41810002 Vibhu Sagar 26.1 33 79.19 3 Y 23.5 29 81.03 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
3 41810003 Varun Bajaj 27.2 33 82.42 3 Y 24.1 29 83.22 3 Y 23.7 28 84.52 3 Y
4 41810004 Tista Lather 28.6 33 86.67 3 Y 25.5 29 88.05 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
5 41810005 Himani 31.9 33 96.77 3 Y 28.0 29 96.67 3 Y 27.0 28 96.55 3 Y
6 41810006 Shivam
Upadhyay
25.1 33 75.96 3 Y 22.9 29 78.85 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
7 41810007 Lakshika Bansal 27.0 33 81.72 3 Y 24.5 29 84.37 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
8 41810008 Fazla Wahid
Ahmed
26.3 33 79.60 3 Y 23.4 29 80.80 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
9 41810009 Anjali 28.0 33 84.95 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 24.2 28 86.43 3 Y
10 41810010 Udeshya Kumar 23.7 33 71.92 3 Y 21.9 29 75.40 3 Y 22.4 28 80.00 3 Y
11 41810012 Sunny Goyat 25.6 33 77.58 3 Y 22.6 29 77.93 3 Y 21.8 28 77.86 3 Y
12 41810014 Shilpa Sharma 28.6 33 86.57 3 Y 25.2 29 86.78 3 Y 24.3 28 86.67 3 Y
13 41810015 Vani 27.8 33 84.14 3 Y 24.2 29 83.56 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
14 41810016 Aakash Singhal 29.9 33 90.71 3 Y 26.5 29 91.49 3 Y 25.5 28 91.19 3 Y
15 41810017 Sonali Goel 27.8 33 84.24 3 Y 24.9 29 85.98 3 Y 24.3 28 86.67 3 Y
16 41810018 Chahat Pundir 29.0 33 87.78 3 Y 25.5 29 87.82 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
17 41810019 Simran 22.8 33 69.09 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
18 41810020 Yukti Kaul 23.5 33 71.11 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
19 41810021 Divam Jain 27.5 33 83.23 3 Y 23.8 29 82.18 3 Y 22.7 28 81.07 3 Y
20 41810022 Madhurima
Purohit
29.4 33 88.99 3 Y 25.8 29 88.85 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
21 41810023 Shubham Singh 28.4 33 86.06 3 Y 25.0 29 86.32 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
22 41810024 Radhika 27.6 33 83.74 3 Y 24.0 29 82.64 3 Y 22.4 28 80.00 3 Y
23 41810025 Abhishek Gupta 28.6 33 86.57 3 Y 25.5 29 87.93 3 Y 24.9 28 89.05 3 Y
24 41810026 Nishith Khare 0.0 33 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 28 0.00 1 N
25 41810027 Siddharth Kumar 28.7 33 86.87 3 Y 24.7 29 85.29 3 Y 23.6 28 84.29 3 Y
26 41810028 Ravish Garg 24.0 33 72.63 3 Y 22.2 29 76.55 3 Y 22.8 28 81.55 3 Y
27 41810029 Nishant Sethi 28.3 33 85.76 3 Y 25.1 29 86.67 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
28 41810030 Diksha Singh 23.2 33 70.30 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 144
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
29 41810031 Palak Gupta 26.0 33 78.89 3 Y 23.6 29 81.38 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
30 41810032 Swati Arora 26.5 33 80.40 3 Y 23.5 29 80.92 3 Y 23.0 28 82.14 3 Y
31 41810033 Megha 29.6 33 89.80 3 Y 25.1 29 86.67 3 Y 23.2 28 82.98 3 Y
32 41810034 Anuj Kumar 23.9 33 72.32 3 Y 22.3 29 76.90 3 Y 22.8 28 81.55 3 Y
33 41810035 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
22.7 33 68.69 3 Y 20.9 29 72.07 3 Y 21.4 28 76.55 3 Y
34 41810036 Amit
Bhattacharjee
25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
35 41810037 Ajay 29.6 33 89.80 3 Y 25.8 29 88.97 3 Y 24.6 28 87.74 3 Y
36 41810038 Shivani 28.7 33 86.97 3 Y 25.4 29 87.70 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
37 41810039 Bhawana 26.1 33 79.19 3 Y 23.5 29 81.03 3 Y 23.4 28 83.45 3 Y
38 41810040 Jayesh Vyas 24.7 33 74.85 3 Y 22.3 29 76.78 3 Y 22.0 28 78.69 3 Y
39 41810041 Meghav Sharma 25.9 33 78.48 3 Y 23.2 29 79.89 3 Y 22.9 28 81.90 3 Y
40 41810042 Shaleen Anand 26.8 33 81.31 3 Y 24.2 29 83.45 3 Y 24.0 28 85.60 3 Y
41 41810043 Karamveer Singh 26.4 33 80.10 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 21.5 28 76.79 3 Y
41 41810044 Kumari Priya 26.7 33 80.81 3 Y 23.7 29 81.84 3 Y 23.6 28 84.29 3 Y
43 41810045 Priyanka Mehta 28.7 33 86.97 3 Y 25.4 29 87.70 3 Y 24.9 28 88.81 3 Y
44 41810046 Abhinn Sharma 28.3 33 85.66 3 Y 24.8 29 85.40 3 Y 24.0 28 85.60 3 Y
45 41810047 Archana Saini 25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
46 41810048 Mohit Bhambhani 25.7 33 77.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 23.1 28 82.38 3 Y
47 41810049 Supriya Dogra 26.9 33 81.62 3 Y 23.3 29 80.23 3 Y 21.8 28 77.86 3 Y
Average 2.96 2.96 2.96
Department of Business Administration Page 145
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3, 2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE OF
3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
CO2 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
CO3 2.96 97.87 0.00 2.13
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.9 97.87 65.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 97.9
CO2 97.9 97.87 0.0 65.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO3 97.9 97.87 0.0 97.9 0.0 97.9 32.6
Avg 98 65.2 81.6 0.0 97.9 65.2
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.1 71.11 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.1
CO2 75.6 75.56 0.0 50.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO3 68.9 68.89 0.0 68.9 0.0 68.9 23.0
Avg 72 47.4 59.6 0.0 68.9 47.0
Department of Business Administration Page 146
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.4 85.42 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.4
CO2 87.5 87.50 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO3 85.4 85.42 0.0 85.4 0.0 85.4 28.5
Avg 86 56.9 71.9 0.0 85.4 56.9
Subject Name & Code: International Business MBA-201
Process used for revising/redefining the POs :
We have defined departmental vision, mission and program educational objectives. In accordance
with these and the Graduate Attributes prescribed by NBA, the program outcomes are defined.
The actual program results are compared with the program outcomes (POs) and the reasons for the
inconsistencies, if any, are assessed and considered while redefining POs. The POs are redefined
on the following bases:
1. Interaction with senior student/alumni.
2. Discussion with the senior staff members of the department regarding POs.
3. According to revision of syllabus by institute.
4. Interaction with industry experts on their expectation.
5. Training and placement data.
6. Policies for government sector.
Methodology to define course outcome attainment levels
Methodology to calculate CO, PO Attainment:
Define CO’s for a course and check their quality
Do mapping of CO with PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Prepare CO alignment sheet and decide Grade scale as follows:
Grade scale
Marks Score
≤ 50% 1
>50% and ≤ 60% 2
>60% 3
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Department of Business Administration Page 147
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 201
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 201
PO2
PO3 MBA 201
PO4 MBA 201
PO5 MBA 201
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 1
CO2 3 2 1 2
CO3 2 1 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Course Cos Course Outcomes
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
(MBA 201)
CO1 Learning and understanding of how business is
conducted in the international arena.
CO2 Gaining managerial skills that are used to meet the
challenges faced in the global workplace.
CO3 In depth understanding of economic institution and
economic integration
Department of Business Administration Page 148
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 25.1 31 81.08 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 22.8 30 76.00 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 19.9 31 64.30 3 Y 18.2 29 62.87 3 Y 17.8 30 59.44 2 N
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 22.6 31 72.90 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 22.5 30 75.00 3 Y
4 41710009 Imran Rafiq 27.1 31 87.53 3 Y 25.2 29 87.01 3 Y 25.6 30 85.44 3 Y
5 41710026 Sushobhan 21.6 31 69.68 3 Y 19.3 29 66.67 3 Y 19.1 30 63.56 3 Y
6 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 22.0 31 70.97 3 Y 20.2 29 69.77 3 Y 20.8 30 69.22 3 Y
7 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 24.2 31 77.96 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 21.5 30 71.78 3 Y
8 41710029 Vipul Sen 23.9 31 77.10 3 Y 21.1 29 72.87 3 Y 20.5 30 68.22 3 Y
9 41710030 Shubham Kumar 21.5 31 69.35 3 Y 19.9 29 68.74 3 Y 20.1 30 66.89 3 Y
10 41710031 Priya Chauhan 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y 21.6 29 74.60 3 Y 20.8 30 69.33 3 Y
11 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 23.9 31 77.10 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 22.2 30 74.00 3 Y
12 41710051 Aadi Singhal 21.1 31 67.96 3 Y 19.3 29 66.44 3 Y 19.7 30 65.56 3 Y
13 41710052 Mehak Juneja 23.0 31 74.19 3 Y 21.2 29 72.99 3 Y 21.3 30 71.11 3 Y
14 41710053 Ekta Dogra 23.5 31 75.91 3 Y 20.8 29 71.84 3 Y 20.1 30 67.11 3 Y
15 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 24.4 31 78.82 3 Y 21.1 29 72.87 3 Y 19.9 30 66.44 3 Y
16 41710055 Ankur 23.5 31 75.81 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.2 30 73.89 3 Y
17 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 17.7 29 60.92 3 Y 17.5 30 58.22 2 N
18 41710058 Nishu 23.8 31 76.67 3 Y 21.7 29 74.71 3 Y 21.6 30 71.89 3 Y
19 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 20.6 31 66.34 3 Y 19.5 29 67.36 3 Y 19.9 30 66.33 3 Y
20 41710077 Ayush Jha 23.9 31 77.10 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 21.7 30 72.22 3 Y
21 41710078 Shalini Singh 25.1 31 80.97 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 23.4 30 77.89 3 Y
22 41710079 Mansi 26.7 31 86.13 3 Y 24.0 29 82.87 3 Y 23.8 30 79.22 3 Y
23 41710081 Monika Singh 22.4 31 72.26 3 Y 18.4 29 63.45 3 Y 16.2 30 54.00 2 N
24 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 19.3 31 62.15 3 Y 18.9 29 65.06 3 Y 20.4 30 67.89 3 Y
25 41710083 Rohit Kataria 17.2 31 55.38 2 N 15.0 29 51.84 2 N 14.8 30 49.33 1 N
Average 2.96 2.96 2.80
Department of Business Administration Page 149
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.96 96.00 4.00 0.00
CO2 2.96 96.00 4.00 0.00
CO3 2.80 84.00 12.00 4.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 96.0 96.00 96.0 64.0 64.0 32.0
CO2 96.0 96.00 96.0 64.0 32.0 64.0
CO3 84.0 84.00 56.0 28.0 56.0 56.0 Avg 92 83 52.0 50.7 50.7
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 78.3 78.26 78.3 52.2 52.2 26.1
CO2 73.9 73.91 73.9 49.3 24.6 49.3
CO3 67.4 67.39 44.9 22.5 44.9 44.9 Avg 73 66 41.3 40.6 40.1
Department of Business Administration Page 150
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 93.0 93.02 93.0 62.0 62.0 31.0
CO2 97.7 97.67 97.7 65.1 32.6 65.1
CO3 97.7 97.67 65.1 32.6 65.1 65.1 Avg 96 85 53.2 53.2 53.7
Subject Name & Code: Business Law and Corporate Taxation MBA-203
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-203
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 203
PO2
PO3 MBA 203
PO4 MBA 203
PO5 MBA 203
Course COs Course Outcomes
BUSINESS LAW
AND
CORPORATE
TAXATION
(MBA 203)
CO1 Demonstrate an understanding of the Legal
Environment of Business.
CO2 To understand various aspects and dynamics of
legislation that affects any business.
CO3 To understand the role of case law in statutory and
regulatory interpretation in the business law area.
Department of Business Administration Page 151
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3
CO2 2 1 3 1
CO3 2 1 3 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 152
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1
CO2
CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 25.1 31 81.08 3 Y 22.7 29 78.39 3 Y 22.1 30 73.78 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 21.5 31 69.46 3 Y 20.6 29 70.92 3 Y 20.9 30 69.67 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 21.1 31 68.17 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 20.6 30 68.67 3 Y
4 41710009 Imran Rafiq 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 23.9 30 79.56 3 Y
5 41710026 Sushobhan 20.6 31 66.45 3 Y 19.6 29 67.59 3 Y 19.8 30 66.00 3 Y
6 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 24.1 31 77.63 3 Y 22.7 29 78.39 3 Y 23.2 30 77.33 3 Y
7 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 24.5 31 78.92 3 Y 21.7 29 74.83 3 Y 20.8 30 69.44 3 Y
8 41710029 Vipul Sen 22.5 31 72.47 3 Y 21.9 29 75.40 3 Y 22.7 30 75.56 3 Y
9 41710030 Shubham Kumar 21.7 31 69.89 3 Y 20.6 29 71.03 3 Y 20.7 30 69.11 3 Y
10 41710031 Priya Chauhan 25.1 31 81.08 3 Y 24.4 29 84.14 3 Y 25.5 30 84.89 3 Y
11 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 23.9 31 77.20 3 Y 21.7 29 74.83 3 Y 21.4 30 71.22 3 Y
12 41710051 Aadi Singhal 21.3 31 68.60 3 Y 19.2 29 66.09 3 Y 18.6 30 61.89 3 Y
13 41710052 Mehak Juneja 24.3 31 78.49 3 Y 22.7 29 78.16 3 Y 23.0 30 76.67 3 Y
14 41710053 Ekta Dogra 26.3 31 84.95 3 Y 25.0 29 86.09 3 Y 25.7 30 85.67 3 Y
15 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 25.4 31 81.94 3 Y 23.7 29 81.61 3 Y 23.9 30 79.78 3 Y
16 41710055 Ankur 24.2 31 78.06 3 Y 23.1 29 79.66 3 Y 23.7 30 79.00 3 Y
17 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 21.1 31 68.17 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 20.6 30 68.67 3 Y
18 41710058 Nishu 25.5 31 82.37 3 Y 23.7 29 81.72 3 Y 23.8 30 79.22 3 Y
19 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 16.6 31 53.55 2 N 16.1 29 55.63 2 N 16.3 30 54.22 2 N
20 41710077 Ayush Jha 22.7 31 73.33 3 Y 20.5 29 70.57 3 Y 19.8 30 66.00 3 Y
21 41710078 Shalini Singh 25.8 31 83.23 3 Y 25.0 29 86.09 3 Y 26.2 30 87.44 3 Y
22 41710079 Mansi 25.4 31 81.94 3 Y 24.3 29 83.91 3 Y 25.3 30 84.22 3 Y
23 41710081 Monika Singh 22.6 31 72.90 3 Y 21.8 29 75.06 3 Y 22.6 30 75.44 3 Y
24 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 20.2 31 65.16 3 Y 19.3 29 66.55 3 Y 19.5 30 65.00 3 Y
25 41710083 Rohit Kataria 20.9 31 67.31 3 Y 19.5 29 67.36 3 Y 19.6 30 65.33 3 Y
Average 2.96 2.96 2.96
Department of Business Administration Page 153
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.96 96.00 4.00 0.00
CO2 2.96 96.00 4.00 0.00
CO3 2.96 96.00 4.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 96.0 96.00 96.0 0.0 96.0 0.0
CO2 96.0 96.00 64.0 32.0 96.0 32.0
CO3 96.0 96.00 64.0 32.0 96.0 32.0 Avg 96 75 32.0 96.0 32.0
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 78.3 78.26 78.3
78.3
CO2 87.0 86.96 58.0 29.0 87.0 29.0
CO3 84.8 84.78 56.5 28.3 84.8 28.3 Avg 83 64 28.6 83.3 28.6
Department of Business Administration Page 154
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.7 97.67 97.7 0.0 97.7 0.0
CO2 97.7 97.67 65.1 32.6 97.7 32.6
CO3 100.0 100.00 66.7 33.3 100.0 33.3 Avg 98 76 32.9 98.4 32.9
Subject Name & Code: Entrepreneurship Development MBA-205
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.0
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-205
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-205
PO2 MBA-205
PO3 MBA-205
PO4 MBA-205
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
DEVELOPMENT
(MBA-205)
CO-
1901
Define, identify and apply the principles related to
entrepreneurial theories.
CO-
1902
Able to understand for preparing a startup business
plan emphasizing role of various financing agencies,
marketing, and technology development.
CO-
1903
Inculcate entrepreneurial spirit to start new business
plan.
Department of Business Administration Page 155
PO5 MBA-205
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 3 2
CO2 2 2 3 3 2
CO3 2 2 2 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 156
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 28.9 33 87.47 3 Y 24.9 29 85.86 3 Y 23.2 28 82.98 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 20.9 33 63.23 3 Y 18.7 29 64.60 3 Y 17.4 28 62.14 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 25.1 33 76.06 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 20.5 28 73.21 3 Y
4 41710009 Imran Rafiq 28.6 33 86.67 3 Y 25.4 29 87.47 3 Y 24.5 28 87.62 3 Y
5 41710026 Sushobhan 22.4 33 67.88 3 Y 20.0 29 69.08 3 Y 19.6 28 69.88 3 Y
6 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 25.0 33 75.76 3 Y 22.5 29 77.59 3 Y 21.5 28 76.79 3 Y
7 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 28.6 33 86.77 3 Y 25.0 29 86.09 3 Y 23.9 28 85.36 3 Y
8 41710029 Vipul Sen 22.9 33 69.29 3 Y 20.7 29 71.49 3 Y 19.9 28 71.07 3 Y
9 41710030 Shubham Kumar 26.5 33 80.30 3 Y 22.4 29 77.13 3 Y 20.1 28 71.90 3 Y
10 41710031 Priya Chauhan 27.7 33 83.94 3 Y 23.4 29 80.80 3 Y 21.4 28 76.31 3 Y
11 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 26.4 33 80.00 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 22.1 28 78.81 3 Y
12 41710051 Aadi Singhal 24.6 33 74.44 3 Y 21.3 29 73.56 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
13 41710052 Mehak Juneja 24.4 33 73.94 3 Y 20.4 29 70.23 3 Y 18.2 28 65.12 3 Y
14 41710053 Ekta Dogra 27.8 33 84.14 3 Y 24.6 29 84.71 3 Y 23.7 28 84.52 3 Y
15 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 26.7 33 80.91 3 Y 23.3 29 80.23 3 Y 22.0 28 78.69 3 Y
16 41710055 Ankur 27.5 33 83.43 3 Y 24.6 29 84.71 3 Y 23.9 28 85.36 3 Y
17 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 22.5 33 68.08 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 19.3 28 68.81 3 Y
18 41710058 Nishu 28.2 33 85.35 3 Y 24.7 29 85.17 3 Y 23.6 28 84.40 3 Y
19 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 17.3 33 52.53 2 N 16.3 29 56.32 2 N 15.8 28 56.55 2 N
20 41710077 Ayush Jha 25.1 33 76.16 3 Y 21.8 29 75.06 3 Y 20.1 28 71.79 3 Y
21 41710078 Shalini Singh 27.2 33 82.42 3 Y 24.9 29 85.86 3 Y 24.9 28 88.93 3 Y
22 41710079 Mansi 28.5 33 86.36 3 Y 24.7 29 85.17 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
23 41710081 Monika Singh 23.8 33 72.22 3 Y 21.5 29 74.25 3 Y 21.1 28 75.48 3 Y
24 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 22.7 33 68.79 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 3 Y 16.6 28 59.40 2 N
25 41710083 Rohit Kataria 14.1 33 42.73 1 N 12.8 29 44.14 1 N 12.1 28 43.21 1 N
Average 2.88 2.88 2.84
Department of Business Administration Page 157
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 2.88 92.00 4.00 4.00
CO2 2.88 92.00 4.00 4.00
CO3 2.84 88.00 8.00 4.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target level
of CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 92.0 92.00 92.0 61.3 61.3 92.0 61.3
CO2 92.0 92.00 61.3 61.3 92.0 92.0 61.3
CO3 88.0 88.00 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 Avg 91 71 60.4 70.7 80.9 60.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 50.0 50.00 50.0 33.3 33.3 50.0 33.3
CO2 65.2 65.22 43.5 43.5 65.2 65.2 43.5
CO3 63.0 63.04 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Avg 59 45 39.6 46.9 52.4 39.6
Department of Business Administration Page 158
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 70.5 70.45 70.5 47.0 47.0 70.5 47.0
CO2 75.0 75.00 50.0 50.0 75.0 75.0 50.0
CO3 63.6 63.64 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 42.4 Avg 70 54 46.5 54.8 62.6 46.5
Subject Name & Code: Labour Law MBA-211
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
LABOUR
LAW
(MBA-211)
CO1 Students will be aware of the employer’s obligations under the statutes
and employee/workers rights under the Acts.
CO2 To students will know the powers of the government/authorities under
the Act and the consequences of non-compliance of the statutes.
CO3 Develop understanding of the fundamental principles and how they
apply to certain legal problems will certainly enable students in
avoiding conflict with labour.
Department of Business Administration Page 159
MBA-211
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-211
PO2 MBA-211
PO3 MBA-211
PO4 MBA-211
PO5 MBA-211
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2 3 3
CO2 3 3 3 3 3
CO3 2 1 2 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 160
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 20.6 30 68.71 3 Y 20.3 30 67.58 3 Y 19.6 30 65.38 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 21.6 30 72.04 3 Y 22.3 30 74.24 3 Y 22.6 30 75.38 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 22.7 30 75.53 3 Y 23.0 30 76.71 3 Y 23.3 30 77.76 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 25.3 30 84.29 3 Y 24.9 30 83.09 3 Y 24.3 30 80.96 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 19.3 30 64.47 2 N 20.0 30 66.62 3 Y 20.7 30 68.91 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 26.3 30 87.78 3 Y 24.3 30 81.11 3 Y 22.3 30 74.44 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 23.0 30 76.56 3 Y 23.4 30 78.00 3 Y 23.6 30 78.78 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 10.6 30 35.33 1 N 11.1 30 37.11 1 N 11.3 30 37.56 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 161
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.63 75.00 12.50 12.50
CO2 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO3 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 75.00 50.0 50.0 50.0 75.0 75.0
CO2 87.50 87.5 87.5 87.5 87.5 87.5
CO3 87.50 58.3 29.2 58.3 87.5 87.5
Avg. 88 68 58.3 68.1 87.5 87.5
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 50.00 33.3 33.3 33.3 50.0 50.0
CO2 50.00 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
CO3 58.33 38.9 19.4 38.9 58.3 58.3
Avg. 61 47 38.9 47.2 61.1 61.1
Department of Business Administration Page 162
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 57.1 57.1 57.1 85.7 85.7
CO2 85.71 85.7 85.7 85.7 85.7 85.7
CO3 85.71 57.1 28.6 57.1 85.7 85.7
Avg. 86 67 57.1 66.7 85.7 85.7
Subject Name & Code: Organisational Change and DevelopmentMBA-221
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
ORGANISATIONAL
CHANGE AND
DEVELOPMENT
(MBA-221)
CO1 To explain organizational change processes and learn
approaches and strategies for managing organizational
change.
CO2 To recognize an improvement in their ability to
synthesize, articulate, and disseminate information
CO3 To impart knowledge concerning organizational change
to others through dialogue and critique.
Department of Business Administration Page 163
MBA221
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-221
PO2 MBA-221
PO3 MBA-221
PO4 MBA-221
PO5 MBA-221
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2 3
CO2 3 3 2 3
CO3 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 164
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 24.8 31 80.11 3 Y 22.8 29 78.51 3 Y 22.9 30 76.33 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 23.7 31 76.56 3 Y 20.4 29 70.46 3 Y 19.3 30 64.44 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 23.3 31 75.27 3 Y 20.1 29 69.43 3 Y 19.0 30 63.44 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 25.6 31 82.69 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 22.8 30 76.11 3 Y
5 41710059 Nishu 24.4 31 78.71 3 Y 23.2 29 79.89 3 Y 24.4 30 81.44 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 24.2 30 80.56 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 23.6 31 76.24 3 Y 22.2 29 76.67 3 Y 23.1 30 77.11 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 10.3 31 33.33 1 N 10.4 29 35.86 1 N 11.3 30 37.56 1 N
Average 2.75 2.75 2.75
Department of Business Administration Page 165
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO2 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO3 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.5 58.3 0.0 58.3 58.3 87.5
CO2 87.5 87.5 0.0 87.5 58.3 87.5
CO3 87.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 58.3 0.0
Avg. 88
73 87.5 72.9 58.3 87.5
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.7 61.1 0.0 61.1 61.1 91.7
CO2 91.7 91.7 0.0 91.7 61.1 91.7
CO3 75.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 50.0 0.0
Avg. 86 76 75.0 76.4 57.4 91.7
Department of Business Administration Page 166
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 66.7 0.0 66.7 66.7 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 66.7 100.0
CO3 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 66.7 0.0
Avg. 100.0 83 100.0 83.3 66.7 100.0
Subject Name & Code: Management Training and Development MBA-231
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-231
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-231
PO2 MBA-231
PO3 MBA-231
PO4 MBA-231
PO5 MBA-231
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
MANAGEMENT
TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT
(MBA-231)
CO-
2401
Students will be able to understand the importance of
training and development for organization as well as for
employees.
CO-
2402
To understand the need, importance of evaluation of
training and management development.
CO-
2403
The students will also be aware about the contemporary
approaches and issues in training and development.
Department of Business Administration Page 167
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 2 3
CO2 2 3 1 3 3
CO3 2 2 2 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 168
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 22.3 31 71.83 3 Y 18.7 26 72.05 3 Y 26.0 33 78.79 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 21.8 31 70.22 3 Y 19.4 26 74.62 3 Y 26.8 33 81.31 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 17.4 26 66.92 3 Y 23.3 33 70.71 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 24.7 31 79.68 3 Y 21.1 26 81.03 3 Y 29.2 33 88.59 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 23.7 31 76.56 3 Y 20.2 26 77.82 3 Y 28.5 33 86.46 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 24.9 31 80.22 3 Y 21.4 26 82.18 3 Y 30.3 33 91.72 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 22.2 31 71.51 3 Y 19.6 26 75.38 3 Y 27.2 33 82.53 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 12.4 31 39.89 1 N 12.0 26 46.15 1 N 18.6 33 56.46 2 N
Department of Business Administration Page 169
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO2 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO3 2.88 87.50 12.50 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO
CO attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.5 87.5 58.3 58.3 58.3 87.5
CO2 87.5 58.3 87.5 29.2 87.5 87.5
CO3 87.5 58.3 58.3 58.3 87.5 87.5
Avg. 88 68 68.1 48.6 77.8 87.5
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 66.67 66.7 44.4 44.4 44.4 66.7
CO2 66.67 44.4 66.7 22.2 66.7 66.7
CO3 75.00 50.0 50.0 50.0 75.0 75.0
Avg. 92 71 71.3 50.9 81.5 91.7
Department of Business Administration Page 170
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 85.7 57.1 57.1 57.1 85.7
CO2 85.71 57.1 85.7 28.6 85.7 85.7
CO3 85.71 57.1 57.1 57.1 85.7 85.7
Avg. 86 67 66.7 47.6 76.2 85.7
Subject Name & Code: Counseling Skills for Managers MBA-241
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-241
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-241
PO2 MBA-241
PO3 MBA-241
PO4 MBA-241
PO5 MBA-241
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
Counseling Skills for
Managers
(MBA-241)
CO-
2501
The students will be conversant with counseling concept,
goals and its process.
CO-
2502
The students will be able to understand and apply
counseling skill and advanced counseling skills to solve the
business problems.
CO-
2503
The students will be well versed with the performance
counseling and different counseling therapies.
Department of Business Administration Page 171
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 0 1 3 2
CO2 2 2 3 2 3
CO3 2 2 2 2 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 172
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 23.6 33 71.52 3 Y 18.5 24 76.94 3 Y 26.9 33 81.62 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 23.4 33 70.91 3 Y 18.2 24 75.83 3 Y 25.4 33 76.97 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 22.8 33 69.09 3 Y 18.1 24 75.28 3 Y 28.1 33 85.25 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 25.6 33 77.58 3 Y 20.0 24 83.19 3 Y 29.9 33 90.71 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 23.9 33 72.42 3 Y 18.9 24 78.61 3 Y 29.2 33 88.59 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 26.9 33 81.62 3 Y 20.6 24 85.97 3 Y 29.9 33 90.71 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 23.6 33 71.62 3 Y 18.7 24 78.06 3 Y 27.6 33 83.74 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 15.6 33 47.17 1 N 13.5 24 56.39 2 N 22.9 33 69.39 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 173
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 1 point in the COs)
CO1 2.75 87.5 0 12.5
CO2 2.88 87.5 12.5 0
CO3 3.00 100 0 0
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.50 87.5 0.0 29.2 87.5 58.3
CO2 87.50 58.3 58.3 87.5 58.3 87.5
CO3 100.00 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 100.0
Avg. 92 71 62.5 61.1 70.8 81.9
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 66.67 66.7 0.0 22.2 66.7 44.4
CO2 66.67 44.4 44.4 66.7 44.4 66.7
CO3 58.33 38.9 38.9 38.9 38.9 58.3
Avg. 72 56 47.2 48.1 56.5 63.9
Department of Business Administration Page 174
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 85.7 0.0 28.6 85.7 57.1
CO2 85.71 57.1 57.1 85.7 57.1 85.7
CO3 71.43 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.6 71.4
Avg. 86 67 57.1 57.1 66.7 76.2
Subject Name & Code: Performance Management MBA-251
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT(MBA-
251)
CO1 Design an organization’s performance management
process that is compliant with law and supports
organizational mission and strategy.
CO2 To evaluate and distinguish a variety of organizational
performance management programs and most excellent
practices
CO3 Employ job-related performance standards and
performance indicators that reflect the employee’s range
of responsibilities
Department of Business Administration Page 175
MBA251
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-251
PO2 MBA-251
PO3 MBA-251
PO4 MBA-251
PO5 MBA-251
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 3
CO2 3 2 2
CO3 2 3 3 2 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 176
Table No 3 S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 23.7 31 76.34 3 Y 23.0 29 79.43 3 Y 24.3 30 81.00 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 21.7 31 69.89 3 Y 21.5 29 74.02 3 Y 22.9 30 76.22 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 19.3 31 62.15 3 Y 20.2 29 69.54 3 Y 22.1 30 73.56 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 23.5 31 75.91 3 Y 22.7 29 78.16 3 Y 23.8 30 79.33 3 Y
5 41710059 Nishu 27.0 31 87.10 3 Y 25.2 29 86.90 3 Y 25.8 30 86.00 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 23.6 31 76.13 3 Y 23.5 29 81.09 3 Y 25.4 30 84.61 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 21.1 31 67.96 3 Y 21.5 29 73.97 3 Y 23.5 30 78.28 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 13.3 31 42.90 1 N 13.0 29 44.71 1 N 13.2 30 44.11 1 N
Average 2.75 2.75 2.75
Department of Business Administration Page 177
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO2 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO3 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.5 87.5 0.0 58.3 87.5 0.0
CO2 87.5 0.0 87.5 58.3 0.0 58.3
CO3 87.5 58.3 87.5 87.5 58.3 87.5
Avg. 88 73 87.5 68.1 72.9 72.9
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 66.7 66.7 0.0 44.4 66.7 0.0
CO2 66.7 0.0 66.7 44.4 0.0 44.4
CO3 50.0 33.3 50.0 50.0 33.3 50.0
Avg. 61 50 58.3 46.3 50.0 47.2
Department of Business Administration Page 178
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.0 0.0 66.7 100.0 0.0
CO2 83.3 0.0 83.3 55.6 0.0 55.6
CO3 66.7 44.4 66.7 66.7 44.4 66.7
Avg. 83 72 75.0 63.0 72.2 61.1
Subject Name & Code: Financial Institution & Markets MBA-213
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION &
MARKETS(MBA
213)
CO1 Demonstrate an understanding of the overall functions
of financial markets and intermediary institutions.
CO2 Evaluate the economic environment and the impact of
governmental economic policies on consumers and
financial institutions.
CO3 Describe the impact that non-banking financial
institutions and mutual fund has had on the structure of
the financial firms/industry.
Department of Business Administration Page 179
MBA 213
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 213
PO2 MBA 213
PO3 MBA 213
PO4 MBA 213
PO5 MBA 213
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 1 2 1 2 1
CO2 3 3 1 2 2
CO3 2 2 2 2 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 180
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 25.4 31 81.83 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 21.1 30 70.44 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
26.0 31 83.98 3 Y 23.2 29 80.11 3 Y 22.4 30 74.67 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 27.4 31 88.39 3 Y 25.5 29 87.93 3 Y 24.7 30 82.22 3 Y
Average 3
3 3
Department of Business Administration Page 181
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 33.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 33.3
CO2 100.0 100.0 100.0 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 33.3
Avg. 67 77.8 44.4 66.7 44.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level
of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 64.3 21.4 42.9 21.4 42.9 21.4
CO2 57.1 57.1 57.1 19.0 38.1 38.1
CO3 50.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 33.3 16.7
Avg. 64.3 37 44.4 24.6 38.1 25.4
Department of Business Administration Page 182
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level
of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.7 31.9 63.8 31.9 63.8 31.9
CO2 95.7 95.7 95.7 31.9 63.8 63.8
CO3 95.7 63.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 31.9
Avg. 95.7 64 74.4 42.5 63.8 42.5
Subject Name & Code: Merchant Banking and Financial Services MBA-223
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO
mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and
employer survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-223
PO2 MBA-223
PO3 MBA-223
PO4 MBA-223
PO5 MBA-223
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 1 2 2
CO2 3 3 2 2 2
CO3 1 2 1 3 1
Course COs Course Outcomes
MERCHANT
BANKING &
FINANCIAL
SERVICES
(MBA-223)
CO1 Demonstrate the financial system and the legal &
regulatory framework.
CO2 Understand the functioning of Merchant Bankers related
to Issue Management Process, Merger & Acquisitions
and Business Valuations.
CO3 Understand the various financial services and their
suitability in attaining the organization objective.
Department of Business Administration Page 183
Table No 3 S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 22.9 31 73.76 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.3 30 74.33 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham Kumar 23.4 31 75.48 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 21.1 30 70.33 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 26.1 31 84.09 3 Y 24.6 29 84.71 3 Y 25.4 30 84.56 3 Y
Average 3 3 3
Department of Business Administration Page 184
Table no. 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Table no. 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 33.3 66.7 33.3 100.0 33.3
Avg 100 78 77.8 44.4 77.8 55.6
Table no. 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.7 85.71 85.7 57.1 28.6 57.1 57.1
CO2 85.7 85.71 85.7 85.7 57.1 57.1 57.1
CO3 78.6 78.57 26.2 52.4 26.2 78.6 26.2
Avg 83 66 65.1 37.3 64.3 46.8
Department of Business Administration Page 185
Table no. 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.5 95.45 95.5 63.6 31.8 63.6 63.6
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 33.3 66.7 33.3 100.0 33.3
Avg 98 76 76.8 43.9 76.8 54.5
Subject Name & Code: Security Analysis & Portfolio MBA-233
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 233
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 233
PO2 MBA 233
PO3 MBA 233
PO4 MBA 233
PO5 MBA 233
Course Cos Course Outcomes
SECURITY
ANALYSIS &
PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 233)
CO1 Understanding of Investments, impacting factors and their
evaluation including empirical applications of asset pricing
models.
CO2 Analyse and evaluate the financial securities using the
fundamental and technical analysis.
CO3 Build a diversified portfolio and assess portfolio
performance.
Department of Business Administration Page 186
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 1 3 2
CO2 3 3 2 2 3
CO3 1 2 2 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 187
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 26.8 31 86.56 3 Y 24.8 29 85.63 3 Y 25.3 30 84.44 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
24.0 31 77.53 3 Y 22.6 29 77.93 3 Y 23.4 30 77.89 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 29.0 31 93.44 3 Y 26.0 29 89.77 3 Y 26.0 30 86.67 3 Y
Average 3 Average 3 Average 3
Department of Business Administration Page 188
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 100.0 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7 100.0
CO3 100.0 33.3 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
Avg. 78 77.8 55.6 77.8 77.8
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.4 71.4 47.6 23.8 71.4 47.6
CO2 71.4 71.4 71.4 47.6 47.6 71.4
CO3 42.9 14.3 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6
Avg.
52 49.2 33.3 49.2 49.2
Department of Business Administration Page 189
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to
set target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 69.6 69.6 46.4 23.2 69.6 46.4
CO2 78.3 78.3 78.3 52.2 52.2 78.3
CO3 82.6 27.5 55.1 55.1 55.1 55.1
Avg.
58 59.9 43.5 58.9 59.9
Subject Name & code: Insurance and Risk Management MBA-243
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
INSURANCE AND
RISK
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-243)
CO1 Demonstrate the risk management needs and insurance
contract features
CO2 Demonstrate knowledge of insurance contracts and provisions,
and the features of personal & commercial insurance, life and
health insurance, and various general insurance plans
CO3 Develop the analytical skills necessary to make optimal
decisions relatively to insurance products and alternative
strategies and also to Demonstrate knowledge of the operation
and management of insurance entities
Department of Business Administration Page 190
MBA252
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-243
PO2 MBA-243
PO3 MBA-243
PO4 MBA-243
PO5 MBA-243
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 1 1 2 2
CO2 3 1 1 3 2
CO3 2 3 2 1 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 191
Table No 3
S.
N
o
Roll No Names
CO1 CO2 CO3
MO M
M
%
ag
e
Scor
e
Y/
N MO
M
M
%
ag
e
Scor
e
Y/
N MO
M
M
%
ag
e
Scor
e
Y/
N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 25 31 80 3 Y 23 29 78 3 Y 23 30 75 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar 24 31 76 3 Y 22 29 76 3 Y 22 30 75 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 25 31 81 3 Y 23 29 79 3 Y 23 30 77 3 Y
Average 3 3 3
Department of Business Administration Page 192
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 100.0 66.7
CO3 100.0 66.7 100.0 66.7 33.3 100.0
Avg. 100 89 55.6 44.4 66.7 77.8
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level
of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 100.0 66.7
CO3 100.0 66.7 100.0 66.7 33.3 100.0
Avg. 100 89 55.6 44.4 66.7 77.8
Department of Business Administration Page 193
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.65 95.7 31.9 31.9 63.8 63.8
CO2 95.65 95.7 31.9 31.9 95.7 63.8
CO3 91.30 60.9 91.3 60.9 30.4 91.3
Avg. 94 84 51.7 41.5 63.3 72.9
Subject Name & code: Project Finance MBA-253
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course MBA -
253 Cos
Course Outcomes
PROJECT
FINANCE
(MBA 253)
CO1 Develop an understanding of project management and related factors
including decision making.
CO2 Evaluate economic and financial cash flows models to analyze
project risk.
CO3 Develop the appropriate financial structure for a project and
determine a project finance arrangement that meets organization
needs.
Department of Business Administration Page 194
MBA-253
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA - 253
PO2 MBA - 253
PO3 MBA - 253
PO4 MBA - 253
PO5 MBA - 253
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2 2 3
CO2 3 3 3 2 3
CO3 3 3 1 1 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 195
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Scor
e
Y/N MO MM %
age
Scor
e
Y/N MO MM %
age
Scor
e
Y/N
1 41710009 Imran
Rafiq
26.3 33 79.70 3 Y 23.0 29 79.20 3 Y 21.7 28 77.62 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
23.4 33 70.81 3 Y 21.4 29 73.91 3 Y 21.2 28 75.71 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 26.7 33 81.01 3 Y 24.0 29 82.64 3 Y 23.3 28 83.21 3 Y
Average
3.00 3.00 3.00
Department of Business Administration Page 196
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 100.0
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 Avg 100 100 100.0 66.7 55.6 77.8
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 78.6 78.57 78.6 78.6 52.4 52.4 78.6
CO2 78.6 78.57 78.6 78.6 78.6 52.4 78.6
CO3 71.4 71.43 71.4 71.4 23.8 23.8 23.8 Avg 76 76 76.2 51.6 42.9 60.3
Department of Business Administration Page 197
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 100.0
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 Avg 100 100 100.0 66.7 55.6 77.8
Subject Name & Code: Integrated Marketing Communication MBA-215
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
INTEGRATED
MARKETING
COMMUNICATION
(MBA 215)
CO1 To teach the art of ad making for an analysed business
product and situations, so that they can reach a creative
and logical solution.
CO2 To provide them with the ethical and social values
related to advertising as it is a weapon of mass
influence.
CO3 To make the student evaluate advertisement
effectiveness and take the budgetory decisions
Department of Business Administration Page 198
MBA 215
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 215
PO2
PO3 MBA 215
PO4 MBA 215
PO5 MBA 215
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3
CO2 3 3 3 1
CO3 2 2 2
CO4 3
Department of Business Administration Page 199
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Table No. 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul
Majid
22.8 31 73.66 3 Y 20.8 29 71.72 3 Y 20.9 30 69.56 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit
Gupta
18 31 58.06 2 N 16.2 29 55.75 2 N 15.8 30 52.78 2 N
3 41710007 Yogesh
Kumar
Bajpai
19.2 31 61.94 3 Y 18.4 29 63.45 3 Y 19.4 30 64.67 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 19.1 31 61.51 3 Y 16.3 29 56.09 2 N 15.2 30 50.56 2 N
5 41710027 Ashish
Aggarwal
19.2 31 61.94 3 Y 18.7 29 64.6 3 Y 20.1 30 66.89 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 21.5 31 69.25 3 Y 19.3 29 66.55 3 Y 19.2 30 64.11 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi
Jaiswal
23.7 31 76.56 3 Y 21.2 29 73.1 3 Y 21.1 30 70.22 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi
Singhal
20.4 31 65.81 3 Y 18.9 29 65.06 3 Y 19.2 30 64.11 3 Y
9 41710054 Manvi
Kapoor
21.9 31 70.54 3 Y 19.3 29 66.44 3 Y 18.9 30 62.89 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh
Khorwal
18 31 58.17 2 N 16.6 29 57.36 2 N 16.3 30 54.44 2 N
11 41710076 Samridh
Kumar
Pandey
17.9 31 57.74 2 N 16.9 29 58.39 2 N 17.2 30 57.22 2 N
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 19.8 31 63.76 3 Y 18.3 29 63.1 3 Y 18.4 30 61.44 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 24.5 31 79.03 3 Y 21.2 29 73.22 3 Y 20.8 30 69.22 3 Y
Department of Business Administration Page 200
14 41710082 Eeshan
Rituaweik
13.2 31 42.69 1 N 12.5 29 43.22 1 N 13.2 30 44.11 1 N
Average 2.64
2.57 2.57
Department of Business Administration Page 201
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the above
table)
3 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.64 71.43 21.43 7.14
CO2 2.57 64.29 28.57 7.14
CO3 2.57 64.29 28.57 7.14
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.42857 71.42857 71.42857 0 0
CO2 64.28571 64.28571 64.28571 64.28571 64.28571
CO3 64.28571 64.28571 42.85714 0 42.85714
Avg.
66.66 59.52 64.28 53.57
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 70 70 70 0 0 0
CO2 55 55 55 0 55 55
CO3 60 60 40 0 0 40 Avg 61.66 55 0 55 47.5
Department of Business Administration Page 202
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to
set target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 73.33 73.33 73.33 0 0 0
CO2 80 80 80 0 80 80
CO3 53.33 53.33 35.55 0 0 35.55 Avg 68.88 62.96 0 80 57.77
Subject Name & code: Sales and Distribution Management MBA-225
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 225
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 225
PO2 MBA 225
PO3 MBA 225
PO4 MBA 225
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
SALES AND
DISTRIBUTION
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 225)
CO1 To make the students adapt the art of selling an ethical
product in a competitive market.
CO2 To develop a sales team and motivate them to achieve
organizational goal
CO3 To make them to learn the managerial skill of
implementation of quota and territory designing as well
as channel distribution decisions
Department of Business Administration Page 203
PO5 MBA 225
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 0 0 3 0
CO2 0 0 3 0 3
CO3 0 3 0 0 2
CO4 3 0 0 3 0
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 204
Table no. 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 22.8 31 73.66 3 Y 21.0 29 72.53 3 Y 21.1 30 70.44 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 17.6 31 56.77 2 N 16.5 29 57.01 2 N 16.9 30 56.22 2 N
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 17.9 29 61.72 3 Y 17.7 30 59.11 2 N
4 41710026 Sushobhan 16.9 31 54.62 2 N 15.8 29 54.60 2 N 16.2 30 54.11 2 N
5 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 17.6 31 56.77 2 N 16.9 29 58.16 2 N 17.5 30 58.44 2 N
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 18.8 31 60.65 3 Y 18.1 29 62.41 3 Y 19.1 30 63.67 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 20.1 31 64.95 3 Y 19.2 29 66.09 3 Y 19.7 30 65.67 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 19.6 31 63.12 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.4 30 61.33 3 Y
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 24.2 31 77.96 3 Y 21.3 29 73.45 3 Y 20.5 30 68.44 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 16.3 31 52.47 2 N 15.1 29 51.95 2 N 14.7 30 48.89 1 N
11 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 12.7 31 40.86 1 N 13.3 29 45.98 1 N 14.5 30 48.33 1 N
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 19.9 31 64.19 3 Y 18.3 29 63.22 3 Y 18.3 30 60.89 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 24.1 31 77.85 3 Y 22.2 29 76.44 3 Y 22.7 30 75.67 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 14.9 31 47.96 1 N 14.3 29 49.43 1 N 14.8 30 49.33 1 N
Average 2.43 2.43 2.29
Department of Business Administration Page 205
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.43 57.14 28.57 14.29
CO2 2.43 57.14 28.57 14.29
CO3 2.29 50.00 28.57 21.43
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 57.14286 57.14
57.14
CO2 57.14286 57.14 57.14
57.14
CO3 50 50
50 33.33
Avg 54.76 57.14 50 57.14 57.14 45.23
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 50 50 50
50
CO2 25 25 25 25
CO3 25 25 25
16.66
Avg 33.33 50 25 25 50 20.83
Department of Business Administration Page 206
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value of
CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 86.66 86.66 86.66
86.66
CO2 80 80 80
80
CO3 86.66 86.66 86.66 57.77
Avg 84.44 86.66 86.66 80 86.66 68.88
Subject Name & code: Product and Brand Management MBA-235
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 235
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 235
PO2
PO3 MBA 235
PO4 MBA 235
PO5 MBA 235
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
PRODUCT AND
BRAND
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 235)
CO1 Aims to synchronize product and brand management
processes.
CO2 Better understanding of building and maintaining strong
and powerful brands, one of the most valuable assets a
company can have today.
CO3 Understanding of relevant skills and abilities needed to
have competitive advantage within the corporate world.
Department of Business Administration Page 207
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3
CO2 3 2 2
CO3 2 2 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 208
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 25.5 31 82.37 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 22.8 30 75.89 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 19.1 31 61.61 3 Y 18.8 29 64.94 3 Y 20.1 30 66.89 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 21.6 31 69.78 3 Y 19.9 29 68.62 3 Y 20.0 30 66.56 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 22.1 31 71.40 3 Y 19.8 29 68.39 3 Y 19.5 30 65.11 3 Y
5 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 21.6 31 69.68 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 21.1 30 70.44 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 20.7 31 66.77 3 Y 18.9 29 65.06 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 20.4 31 65.91 3 Y 19.1 29 65.86 3 Y 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 20.7 31 66.67 3 Y 18.4 29 63.33 3 Y 18.0 30 59.89 2 N
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 23.4 31 75.38 3 Y 22.0 29 75.75 3 Y 22.7 30 75.56 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 15.2 31 49.03 1 N 14.4 29 49.66 1 N 14.4 30 48.00 1 N
11 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 18.6 31 60.00 2 N 17.8 29 61.38 3 Y 18.1 30 60.33 3 Y
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 21.1 31 68.06 3 Y 19.1 29 65.75 3 Y 18.8 30 62.78 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 24.6 31 79.25 3 Y 22.5 29 77.70 3 Y 22.9 30 76.33 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 15.9 31 51.40 2 N 15.6 29 53.79 2 N 17.5 30 58.22 2 N
Average 2.71 2.79 2.71
Department of Business Administration Page 209
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.71 78.57 14.29 7.14
CO2 2.79 85.71 7.14 7.14
CO3 2.71 78.57 14.29 7.14
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 78.6 78.57 78.6
CO2 85.7 85.71 85.7 57.1
57.1
CO3 78.6 78.57 52.4
52.4 26.2 Avg 81 72 57.1 52.4 41.7
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.0 90.00 90.0
CO2 90.0 90.00 90.0 60.0 60.0
CO3 80.0 80.00 53.3
53.3 26.7 Avg 87 78 60.0 53.3 43.3
Department of Business Administration Page 210
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target level
of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7
66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 66.7
66.7 33.3 Avg 100 89 66.7 66.7 50.0
Subject Name & code: Consumer Behavior MBA-245
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
Pos Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-245
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA245
PO2 MBA 245
PO3 MBA 245
PO4 MBA 245
PO5 MBA 245
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
CONSUMER
BEHAVIOUR
(MBA-245)
CO1 Understanding of the behavior of the buyer in the
marketplace.
CO2 Gaining holistic view of the buyer, which will help in
achieving knowledge of various models
CO3 Framework in understanding buyer’s behavior and align
the knowledge with formulation of appropriate
marketing strategies.
Department of Business Administration Page 211
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 1 1 2 1
CO2 3 1 2 2 3
CO3 3 2 3 2 3
CO4 3 1 1 2 1
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 212
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul
Majid
23.1 31 74.62 3 Y 22.7 29 78.28 3 Y 24.2 30 80.56 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit
Gupta
20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 19.4 29 66.90 3 Y 20.3 30 67.78 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh
Kumar
Bajpai
21.6 31 69.78 3 Y 20.3 29 70.00 3 Y 20.6 30 68.56 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 22.7 31 73.12 3 Y 22.0 29 75.98 3 Y 23.8 30 79.33 3 Y
5 41710027 Ashish
Aggrwal
19.9 31 64.09 2 N 19.9 29 68.74 3 Y 21.7 30 72.33 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 21.5 31 69.25 3 Y 20.7 29 71.38 3 Y 21.8 30 72.78 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi
Jaisawal
22.7 31 73.23 3 Y 21.7 29 74.71 3 Y 22.6 30 75.44 3 Y
8 41710051 Adi
Singhal
18.3 31 58.92 2 N 16.7 29 57.70 2 N 16.5 30 55.00 1 N
9 41710054 Manvi
Kapoor
23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 22.1 29 76.32 3 Y 23.3 30 77.56 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh
Khorwal
20.8 31 67.10 3 Y 19.4 29 66.90 3 Y 19.8 30 66.00 3 Y
11 41710076 Samridh
Kumar
Pandey
14.7 31 47.42 1 N 15.4 29 52.99 1 N 16.4 30 54.78 1 N
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 19.9 31 64.19 2 N 18.4 29 63.56 2 N 18.7 30 62.22 2 N
13 41710079 Mansi 24.4 31 78.82 3 Y 23.4 29 80.69 3 Y 24.7 30 82.22 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan
Rituaweik
21.0 31 67.74 3 Y 19.8 29 68.16 3 Y 20.7 30 69.11 3 Y
Average 2.17
2.67 2.17
Department of Business Administration Page 213
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.64 71.43 21.43 7.14
CO2 2.71 78.57 14.29 7.14
CO3 2.64 78.57 7.14 14.29
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.4 71.4 23.8 23.8 47.6 23.8
CO2 78.6 78.6 26.2 52.4 52.4 78.6
CO3 78.6 78.6 52.4 78.6 52.4 78.6
Avg.
76 34.1 51.6 50.8 60.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
to set target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 70.0 70.0 23.3 23.3 46.7 23.3
CO2 90.0 90.0 30.0 60.0 60.0 90.0
CO3 55.0 55.0 36.7 55.0 36.7 55.0
Avg.
72 30.0 46.1 47.8 56.1
Department of Business Administration Page 214
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 88.9 88.9 29.6 29.6 59.3 29.6
CO2 93.3 93.3 31.1 62.2 62.2 93.3
CO3 93.3 93.3 62.2 93.3 62.2 93.3
Avg.
92 41.0 61.7 61.2 72.1
Subject Name & code: Emerging Concepts in Marketing-I MBA-255
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
EMERGING
CONCEPTS IN
MARKETING-I
(MBA-255)
CO1 Enable students to gain knowledge on rural marketing, challenges
and prospects for improving rural marketing environment.
CO2 Understand how marketing ties into political initiatives as
expressed by citizens, advertisers, and politicians.
CO3 Help students to learn industrial marketing and contemporary
marketing techniques.
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-255
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA255
PO2 MBA255
PO3 MBA255
PO4 MBA255
PO5 MBA255
Department of Business Administration Page 215
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 2 2
CO2 3 2 2 2 2
CO3 3 2 2 1 2
CO4 3 2 2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 216
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 22.2 31 71.61 3 Y 21.0 29 72.30 3 Y 21.3 30 71.11 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 19.7 31 63.66 3 Y 18.3 29 63.10 3 Y 18.5 30 61.56 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 19.9 31 64.09 3 Y 19.3 29 66.44 3 Y 20.4 30 67.89 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 20.4 31 65.81 3 Y 19.2 29 66.21 3 Y 19.9 30 66.33 3 Y
5 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 20.9 31 67.53 3 Y 19.9 29 68.74 3 Y 20.6 30 68.78 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 20.5 31 66.24 3 Y 19.9 29 68.62 3 Y 21.1 30 70.22 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 23.6 31 76.13 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 21.5 30 71.67 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 21.1 31 67.96 3 Y 19.3 29 66.67 3 Y 19.6 30 65.33 3 Y
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 22.2 31 71.51 3 Y 21.2 29 73.22 3 Y 22.1 30 73.67 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 18.7 31 60.22 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.8 30 62.67 3 Y
11 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 18.4 31 59.35 2 N 18.6 29 64.14 3 Y 20.0 30 66.67 3 Y
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 20.5 31 66.24 3 Y 19.9 29 68.62 3 Y 21.1 30 70.22 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 25.5 31 82.37 3 Y 24.3 29 83.79 3 Y 25.2 30 83.89 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 19.7 31 63.66 3 Y 19.0 29 65.63 3 Y 19.7 30 65.78 3 Y
Average 2.93 3.00 3.00
Department of Business Administration Page 217
Table No. 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from the
above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.64 64.29 35.71 0.00
CO2 2.79 78.57 21.43 0.00
CO3 2.86 85.71 14.29 0.00
Table -5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 92.9 92.86 92.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9
CO2 100 100 100 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO3 100 100 100 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7
Avg 98 98 65.1 65.1 54 65.1
Table -5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7 Avg 100 100 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7
Department of Business Administration Page 218
Table -5 (2020-21)
CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7
100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7
Avg 100 100 66.7 66.7 55.6 66.7
Subject Name & code: Strategic Management MBA-202
Process used for revising/redefining the POs :
We have defined departmental vision, mission and program educational objectives. In accordance
with these and the Graduate Attributes prescribed by NBA, the program outcomes are defined.
The actual program results are compared with the program outcomes (POs) and the reasons for the
inconsistencies, if any, are assessed and considered while redefining POs. The POs are redefined
on the following bases:
1. Interaction with senior student/alumni.
2. Discussion with the senior staff members of the department regarding POs.
3. According to revision of syllabus by institute.
4. Interaction with industry experts on their expectation.
5. Training and placement data.
6. Policies for government sector.
Methodology to define course outcome attainment levels
Methodology to calculate CO, PO Attainment:
Define CO’s for a course and check their quality
Do mapping of CO with PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Prepare CO alignment sheet and decide Grade scale as follows:
Grade scale
Marks Score
≤ 50% 1
>50% and ≤ 60% 2
>60% 3
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Department of Business Administration Page 219
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
Pos Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 202
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 202
PO2 MBA 202
PO3 MBA 202
PO4 MBA 202
PO5 MBA 202
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 3
CO2 2 3 2
CO3 2 2 3
CO4 2 2 3
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
STRATEGIC
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 202)
CO1 The students will effectively communicate the change
management strategies in various forums to an array of
audiences with accuracy, clarity, specificity and
professionalism
CO2 To provide the students the understanding of the facts for
advertising on digital media
CO3 To teach the different aspects and approaches of various digital
media vehicles and social media platforms
Department of Business Administration Page 220
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 22.7 31 73.12 3 Y 21.4 29 73.79 3 Y 21.9 30 73.11 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 18.4 31 59.35 2 N 17.3 29 59.54 2 N 17.3 30 57.78 2 N
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 23.1 31 74.57 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.1 30 73.50 3 Y
4 41710009 Imran Rafiq 23.3 31 75.27 3 Y 21.7 29 74.83 3 Y 22.0 30 73.22 3 Y
5 41710026 Sushobhan 19.2 31 61.94 2 N 18.1 29 62.30 2 N 18.7 30 62.44 2 N
6 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 23.2 31 74.84 3 Y 21.5 29 74.14 3 Y 21.8 30 72.67 3 Y
7 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 23.9 31 77.10 3 Y 22.5 29 77.70 3 Y 23.1 30 76.89 3 Y
8 41710029 Vipul Sen 23.9 31 76.99 3 Y 21.9 29 75.52 3 Y 22.2 30 74.11 3 Y
9 41710030 Shubham Kumar 22.9 31 73.98 3 Y 21.2 29 72.99 3 Y 21.4 30 71.33 3 Y
10 41710031 Priya Chauhan 20.5 31 66.24 3 Y 19.2 29 66.32 3 Y 19.7 30 65.78 3 Y
11 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 21.5 29 74.25 3 Y 21.9 30 72.89 3 Y
12 41710051 Aadi Singhal 22.2 31 71.61 3 Y 20.9 29 72.07 3 Y 21.4 30 71.33 3 Y
13 41710052 Mehak Juneja 23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 21.4 29 73.91 3 Y 21.5 30 71.56 3 Y
14 41710053 Ekta Dogra 23.9 31 77.15 3 Y 21.4 29 73.91 3 Y 20.7 30 68.83 3 Y
15 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 24.4 31 78.76 3 Y 22.8 29 78.62 3 Y 23.3 30 77.61 3 Y
16 41710055 Ankur 22.3 31 71.83 3 Y 21.0 29 72.30 3 Y 21.8 30 72.56 3 Y
17 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 20.9 31 67.53 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 2 N 17.6 30 58.78 2 N
18 41710058 Nishu 22.5 31 72.63 3 Y 21.6 29 74.37 3 Y 22.9 30 76.39 3 Y
19 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 18.9 31 61.02 2 N 17.1 29 59.08 2 N 17.0 30 56.50 2 N
20 41710077 Ayush Jha 20.8 31 67.10 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 2 N 18.1 30 60.22 2 N
21 41710078 Shalini Singh 25.3 31 81.72 3 Y 22.9 29 78.85 3 Y 22.8 30 76.00 3 Y
22 41710079 Mansi 26.8 31 86.45 3 Y 25.0 29 86.32 3 Y 26.2 30 87.22 3 Y
23 41710081 Monika Singh 24.4 31 78.71 3 Y 22.4 29 77.24 3 Y 22.7 30 75.67 3 Y
24 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 0.0 31 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 30 0.00 1 N
25 41710083 Rohit Kataria 18.5 31 59.68 2 N 16.9 29 58.28 2 N 16.6 30 55.33 2 N
Average 2.76 2.68 2.68
Department of Business Administration Page 221
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 2.76 80.00 16.00 4.00
CO2 2.68 72.00 24.00 4.00
CO3 2.68 72.00 24.00 4.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 80 80 53.33
53.33 80
CO2 72 72
48
72 48
CO3 72 72 48 0 48 72
Avg
74.66 50.66 48 50.66 74.66 48
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 81.8 81.8 54.5
54.5 81.8
CO2 81.8 81.8
54.5
81.8 54.5
CO3 77.2 77.2 51.5
51.5 77.2
Avg 80.3 53 54.5 53 80.3 54.5
Department of Business Administration Page 222
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target
level of
CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 97.67 97.67 65.12
65.12 97.67
CO2 100.00 100.00
66.67
100.00 66.67
CO3 100.00 100.00 66.67
66.67 100.00
Avg 99.22 65.89 66.67 65.89 99.22 66.67
Subject Name & code: Digital Marketing & E-Commerce MBA-204
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 POs attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
Digital Marketing &
E-Commerce
(MBA 204)
CO1 To provide the students the understanding of the facts for
advertising on digital media
CO2 To teach the different aspects and approaches of various
digital media vehicles and social media platforms
CO3 To empower them with the future of business in digital
world and the eminence presence of it which is growing
rapidly and they will be able to match up to the speed.
Department of Business Administration Page 223
MBA 204
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 204
PO2
PO3 MBA 204
PO4 MBA 204
PO5 MBA 204
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2
CO2 2 2
CO3 2 2 2 2
CO4 2
Department of Business Administration Page 224
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 19.5 31 62.90 3 Y 19.1 29 65.98 3 Y 20.4 30 67.89 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 20.0 31 64.62 3 Y 18.0 29 61.95 3 Y 17.5 30 58.33 2 N
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 19.4 31 62.47 3 Y 18.0 29 62.07 3 Y 18.1 30 60.44 3 Y
4 41710009 Imran Rafiq 20.4 31 65.91 3 Y 18.9 29 65.29 3 Y 19.1 30 63.78 3 Y
5 41710026 Sushobhan 15.6 31 50.32 2 N 14.9 29 51.38 2 N 15.5 30 51.67 2 N
6 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 19.5 31 62.90 3 Y 18.0 29 62.18 3 Y 18.0 30 59.89 2 N
7 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 21.7 31 70.11 3 Y 20.1 29 69.43 3 Y 20.6 30 68.78 3 Y
8 41710029 Vipul Sen 21.5 31 69.35 3 Y 20.4 29 70.46 3 Y 21.1 30 70.22 3 Y
9 41710030 Shubham Kumar 19.9 31 64.09 3 Y 18.4 29 63.56 3 Y 18.7 30 62.33 3 Y
10 41710031 Priya Chauhan 22.1 31 71.40 3 Y 21.0 29 72.41 3 Y 21.9 30 72.89 3 Y
11 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 21.8 31 70.32 3 Y 20.0 29 69.08 3 Y 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y
12 41710051 Aadi Singhal 21.2 31 68.49 3 Y 19.9 29 68.51 3 Y 20.4 30 68.00 3 Y
13 41710052 Mehak Juneja 20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 18.7 29 64.60 3 Y 19.0 30 63.33 3 Y
14 41710053 Ekta Dogra 21.1 31 67.96 3 Y 19.1 29 65.75 3 Y 18.9 30 62.89 3 Y
15 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 24.2 31 77.96 3 Y 22.3 29 76.90 3 Y 22.5 30 75.11 3 Y
16 41710055 Ankur 20.2 31 65.05 3 Y 19.5 29 67.36 3 Y 20.8 30 69.33 3 Y
17 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 19.5 31 62.90 3 Y 18.4 29 63.33 3 Y 18.6 30 62.11 3 Y
18 41710058 Nishu 18.3 31 59.03 2 N 18.2 29 62.87 3 Y 19.5 30 64.89 3 Y
19 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 18.4 31 59.46 2 N 17.5 29 60.23 3 Y 18.1 30 60.33 3 Y
20 41710077 Ayush Jha 20.0 31 64.52 3 Y 18.3 29 63.22 3 Y 18.7 30 62.22 3 Y
21 41710078 Shalini Singh 21.6 31 69.68 3 Y 19.8 29 68.16 3 Y 20.1 30 67.11 3 Y
22 41710079 Mansi 25.5 31 82.15 3 Y 23.4 29 80.80 3 Y 24.1 30 80.33 3 Y
23 41710081 Monika Singh 22.1 31 71.40 3 Y 20.8 29 71.84 3 Y 21.5 30 71.78 3 Y
24 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 2.7 31 8.71 1 N 3.6 29 12.41 1 N 2.7 30 9.00 1 N
25 41710083 Rohit Kataria 17.0 31 54.73 2 N 16.4 29 56.55 2 N 17.1 30 57.11 2 N
Average 2.76 2.84 2.76
Department of Business Administration Page 225
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
CO Alignment
CO
GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.76 80 16 4
CO2 2.84 88 8 4
CO3 2.76 80 16 4
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 80 80 53.3
CO2 88 88 58.6 58.6
CO3 80 80 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3
Avg 82.7 55.1 53.3 56 53.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 88.89 88.89 59.26
CO2 88.89 88.89 59.26 59.26
CO3 88.89 88.89 59.26 59.26 59.26 59.26
Avg 88.89 59.26 59.26 59.26 59.26
Department of Business Administration Page 226
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt set
target
level of
CO
Limit to
max value
of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3
CO1 100.00 100.00 66.67
CO2 100.00 100.00 66.67 66.67
CO3 100.00 100.00 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67
Avg 100.00 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67
Subject Name & code: Human Resource Development: Strategies and Systems MBA-212
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
Pos Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
HUMAN
RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT:
STRATEGIES AND
SYSTEMS (MBA-
212)
CO1 To give the understanding and professional competence
in the areas, like facts for the assumption and practice
of HR knowledge and skills
CO2 To significantly appraise existing paradigms and
practice in HRD
CO3 To examine current HRD programmes and their
theoretical underpinnings
Department of Business Administration Page 227
MBA212
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-212
PO2 MBA-212
PO3 MBA-212
PO4 MBA-212
PO5 MBA-212
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 3 2 3
CO2 3
CO3 2 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 228
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 23.4 31 75.59 3 Y 21.9 29 75.63 3 Y 22.6 30 75.44 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 21.4 31 69.14 3 Y 20.0 29 68.85 3 Y 20.6 30 68.67 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 20.8 31 67.20 3 Y 19.7 29 68.05 3 Y 20.4 30 68.11 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 24.5 31 79.03 3 Y 22.1 29 76.32 3 Y 22.4 30 74.56 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 25.0 31 80.75 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 21.2 30 70.56 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 26.1 31 84.30 3 Y 24.1 29 83.22 3 Y 24.7 30 82.44 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 23.7 31 76.45 3 Y 21.5 29 74.25 3 Y 21.8 30 72.56 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 17.5 31 56.45 2 N 16.3 29 56.21 2 N 16.2 30 54.00 2 N
Average 2.88 2.88 2.88
Department of Business Administration Page 229
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.88 87.50 12.50
CO2 2.88 87.50 12.50
CO3 2.88 87.50 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.5 87.5 58.3 87.5 58.3 87.5
CO2 87.5 87.5
CO3 87.5 58.3 58.3 58.3
Avg. 88
78 58.3 72.9 58.3 87.5
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 36.4 36.4 24.2 36.4 24.2 36.4
CO2 54.5 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO3 54.5 36.4 0.0 36.4 36.4 0.0
Avg. 48 42 24.2 36.4 30.3 36.4
Department of Business Administration Page 230
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.7 85.7 57.1 85.7 57.1 85.7
CO2 85.7 85.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO3 85.7 57.1 0.0 57.1 57.1 0.0
Avg. 86 76 57.1 71.4 57.1 85.7
Subject Name & code: Dynamics of Industrial Relations MBA-222
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
Pos Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-222
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-222
PO2 MBA-222
PO3 MBA-222
PO4 MBA-222
PO5 MBA-222
Course Cos Course Outcomes
DYNAMICS
OF
INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS
(MBA-222)
CO1 The students will be familiar with concept, evaluation and scope of
Industrial relation.
CO2 The students will be able to get knowledge about collective
bargaining, settlement machinery and ways of grievance handling
as well as industrial peace.
CO3 The students will know about recent trends in trade union movement
in India and workers’ participation in management also.
Department of Business Administration Page 231
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 3 2
CO2 2 3 0 3 2
CO3 2 2 1 3 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 232
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 25.7 33 78.00 3 Y 26.4 34 77.53 3 Y 17.9 23 77.83 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 26.0 33 78.85 3 Y 26.7 34 78.47 3 Y 18.3 23 79.57 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 24.7 33 74.81 3 Y 26.0 34 76.51 3 Y 18.3 23 79.57 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 27.3 33 82.67 3 Y 28.3 34 83.29 3 Y 19.4 23 84.35 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 27.2 33 82.34 3 Y 28.6 34 84.20 3 Y 20.2 23 87.83 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 28.0 33 84.73 3 Y 29.2 34 86.00 3 Y 19.8 23 86.09 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 25.7 33 78.00 3 Y 26.4 34 77.53 3 Y 17.9 23 77.83 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 17.3 33 52.38 2 N 18.0 34 52.98 2 N 13.7 23 59.57 2 N
Average 2.88 2.88 2.88
Department of Business Administration Page 233
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in the
COs)
1 (This is the percentage
of students who have
scored 1 point in the COs)
CO1 2.88 87.50 12.50 0.00
CO2 2.88 87.50 12.50 0.00
CO3 2.88 87.50 12.50 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.50 87.5 58.3 58.3 87.5 58.3
CO2 87.50 58.3 87.5 0.0 87.5 58.3
CO3 87.50 58.3 58.3 29.2 87.5 87.5
Avg. 88 68 68.1 43.8 87.5 68.1
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.67 91.7 61.1 61.1 91.7 61.1
CO2 91.67 61.1 91.7 0.0 91.7 61.1
CO3 91.67 61.1 61.1 30.6 91.7 91.7
Avg. 92 71 71.3 45.8 91.7 71.3
Department of Business Administration Page 234
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 85.7 57.1 57.1 85.7 57.1
CO2 85.71 57.1 85.7 0.0 85.7 57.1
CO3 85.71 57.1 57.1 28.6 85.7 85.7
Avg. 86 67 66.7 42.9 85.7 66.7
Subject Name & code: Interpersonal and Group Dynamics MBA-232
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-232
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-232
PO2 MBA-232
PO3 MBA-232
PO4 MBA-232
PO5 MBA-232
Course Cos Course Outcomes
INTERPERSONAL
AND GROUP
DYNAMICS
(MBA-232)
CO1 To have the conceptual as well a practical knowledge of group
dynamics.
CO2 This paper will help the students to improve their interpersonal
behavior and help them to practice the techniques of group
decision-making.
CO3 Students will know how to develop a group, group socialization
process and issue related to group conflict.
Department of Business Administration Page 235
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 0 0 3 3
CO2 2 2 2 2 2
CO3 2 0 0 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 236
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 20.3 25 81.09 3 Y 31.6 41 76.98 3 Y 16.2 24 67.36 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 20.0 25 79.97 3 Y 32.1 41 78.31 3 Y 18.9 24 78.75 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 18.9 25 75.71 3 Y 30.9 41 75.38 3 Y 18.2 24 75.69 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 21.7 25 86.64 3 Y 34.8 41 84.89 3 Y 19.5 24 81.39 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 22.2 25 88.83 3 Y 35.4 41 86.41 3 Y 19.4 24 80.69 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 22.5 25 90.03 3 Y 35.3 41 86.08 3 Y 18.2 24 75.83 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 19.7 25 78.96 3 Y 31.6 41 77.14 3 Y 17.6 24 73.47 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 9.1 25 36.40 1 N 17.4 41 42.44 1 N 11.5 24 47.92 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 237
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO2 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
CO3 2.75 87.50 0.00 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.50 58.3 0.0 0.0 87.5 87.5
CO2 87.50 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3
CO3 87.50 58.3 0.0 0.0 58.3 58.3
Avg. 88 58 58.3 58.3 68.1 68.1
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.67 61.1 0.0 0.0 91.7 91.7
CO2 91.67 61.1 61.1 61.1 61.1 61.1
CO3 91.67 61.1 0.0 0.0 61.1 61.1
Avg. 92 61 61.1 61.1 71.3 71.3
Department of Business Administration Page 238
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 57.1 0.0 0.0 85.7 85.7
CO2 85.71 57.1 57.1 57.1 57.1 57.1
CO3 85.71 57.1 0.0 0.0 57.1 57.1
Avg. 86 57 57.1 57.1 66.7 66.7
Subject Name & code: Compensation Management MBA-242
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations(40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-242
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-242
PO2 MBA-242
PO3
PO4 MBA-242
PO5 MBA-242
Course Cos Course Outcomes
COMPENSATION
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-242)
CO1 The students will be able to demonstrate knowledge in various
components of total compensation, the methods and aims of
different forms of payment systems.
CO2 Students will develop an understanding of the issues in
designing the reward systems and establishing different pay
rates.
CO3 They will come to know about the employers’ obligations
under labor statutes governing wage and salary administration.
Learn some of the implications for strategic compensation and
possible employer approaches to managing legally required
benefits.
Department of Business Administration Page 239
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 0 3 2
CO2 2 2 2 0
CO3 2 0 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 240
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 22.0 29 75.98 3 Y 29.9 38 78.77 3 Y 18.0 23 78.41 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 22.2 29 76.44 3 Y 28.3 38 74.56 3 Y 16.5 23 71.74 3 Y
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 19.8 29 68.39 3 Y 26.6 38 70.09 3 Y 15.5 23 67.54 3 Y
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 23.5 29 81.15 3 Y 31.9 38 83.86 3 Y 19.6 23 85.22 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 24.8 29 85.52 3 Y 33.0 38 86.75 3 Y 20.2 23 87.97 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 24.4 29 84.14 3 Y 32.7 38 86.05 3 Y 19.9 23 86.52 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 20.4 29 70.23 3 Y 28.6 38 75.18 3 Y 17.1 23 74.20 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 14.2 29 48.85 1 N 19.2 38 50.61 2 N 11.6 23 50.43 2 N
Average 2.75 2.88 2.88
Department of Business Administration Page 241
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.75 87.50
12.50
CO2 2.88 87.50 12.50
CO3 2.88 87.50 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 87.50 58.3 87.5 58.3
CO2 87.50 58.3 58.3 58.3
CO3 87.50 58.3 87.5 58.3
Avg. 88 58 58.3
77.8 58.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 91.67 61.1 0.0 91.7 61.1
CO2 91.67 61.1 61.1 61.1 0.0
CO3 91.67 61.1 0.0 91.7 61.1
Avg. 92 61 61.1
81.5 61.1
Department of Business Administration Page 242
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 57.1 85.7 57.1
CO2 85.71 57.1 57.1 57.1
CO3 85.71 57.1 85.7 57.1
Avg. 86 57 57.1
76.2 57.1
Subject Name & code: Cross Cultural Management MBA-252
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
CROSS
CULTURAL
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-252)
CO1 Identify and analyse human resource concerns for making
successful results in the contemporary business situation
CO2 To think tactically and recognize the fundamentals of business and
organizations in order to administer change more efficiently in the
global business environment.
CO3 Learn the relevant core features of human resource management in
an worldwide context and to expand capability to outline
explanations to multifaceted business problems.
Department of Business Administration Page 243
MBA 252
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-252
PO2 MBA-252
PO3 MBA-252
PO4 MBA-252
PO5 MBA-252
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2 2
CO2 3 2 3 2
CO3 3 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 244
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710028 Pooja Aggarwal 24.1 31 77.74 3 Y 22.8 29 78.74 3 Y 24.1 30 80.22 3 Y
2 41710031 Priya Chauhan 20.2 31 65.27 3 Y 18.5 29 63.91 2 N 18.2 30 60.78 2 N
3 41710052 Mehak Juneja 19.5 31 62.90 2 N 18.3 29 62.99 2 N 18.2 30 60.78 2 N
4 41710053 Ekta Dogra 24.5 31 79.03 3 Y 21.8 29 75.17 3 Y 21.7 30 72.33 3 Y
5 41710058 Nishu 22.9 31 73.87 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 19.8 30 66.11 3 Y
6 41710078 Shalini Singh 23.8 31 76.88 3 Y 21.8 29 75.06 3 Y 22.4 30 74.67 3 Y
7 41710081 Monika Singh 22.9 31 73.87 3 Y 21.1 29 72.87 3 Y 22.0 30 73.22 3 Y
8 41710083 Rohit Kataria 15.9 31 51.29 1 N 15.1 29 52.07 1 N 15.0 30 50.00 1 N
Average 2.63 2.50 2.50
Department of Business Administration Page 245
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 2.63 75.00 12.50 12.50
CO2 2.50 62.50 25.00 12.50
CO3 2.50 62.50 25.00 12.50
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 75.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0
CO2 62.5 62.5 0.0 41.7 62.5 41.7
CO3 62.5 0.0 0.0 62.5 62.5 41.7
Avg. 67 56 50.0 52.1 58.3 44.4
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.9 60.6 60.6 0.0 60.6 60.6
CO2 90.9 90.9 0.0 60.6 90.9 60.6
CO3 90.9 0.0 0.0 90.9 90.9 60.6
Avg. 91 76 60.6 75.8 80.8 60.6
Department of Business Administration Page 246
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.7 57.1 57.1 0.0 57.1 57.1
CO2 85.7 85.7 0.0 57.1 85.7 57.1
CO3 85.7 0.0 0.0 85.7 85.7 57.1
Avg. 86 71 57.1 71.4 76.2 57.1
Subject Name & code: International Financial Management MBA-214
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-214
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 214
PO2 MBA 214
PO3 MBA 214
PO4 MBA 214
PO5 MBA 214
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
International
Financial
Management (MBA-
214)
CO1 Understand international capital and foreign exchange
market, identify risk relating to exchange rate fluctuations
and develop hedging strategies to deal with them.
CO2 Identify and appraise investment opportunities in the
international environment and the management of
international taxation.
CO3 Manage the multinational firm’s cash & receivables
management and their short term financing avenues.
Department of Business Administration Page 247
Table No 2
COURSE
OUTCOME
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2 3 3
CO2 3 3 3 3 2
CO3 3 3 3 1 2
Avg 3.00 3.00 2.67 2.33 2.33
Department of Business Administration Page 248
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3 MO MM % age Score Y/N MO M
M
% age Score Y/N MO M
M
% age Scor
e
Y/
N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 26.33 31 84.94 3 Y 24.63 29 84.94 3 Y 25.03 30 83.44 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
25.53 31 82.36 3 Y 23.7 29 81.72 3 Y 23.76 30 79.22 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 26.6 31 85.80 3 Y 24.56 29 84.71 3 Y 24.83 30 82.77 3 Y
Average 3 3 3
Department of Business Administration Page 249
Table no. 4 is missing
Table 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 100.0 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 33.3 66.7
Avg 100 100 100.0 88.9 77.8 77.8
Table 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 14.3 14.29 14.3 14.3 9.5 14.3 14.3
CO2 21.4 21.43 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4 14.3
CO3 21.4 21.43 21.4 21.4 21.4 7.1 14.3
Avg 19 19 19.0 17.5 14.3 14.3
Table 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.9 90.91 90.9 90.9 60.6 90.9 90.9
CO2 95.5 95.45 95.5 95.5 95.5 95.5 63.6
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 33.3 66.7
Avg 95 95 95.5 85.4 73.2 73.7
Department of Business Administration Page 250
Subject Name & code: Working Capital Management MBA-224
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 224
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 224
PO2 MBA 224
PO3 MBA 224
PO4 MBA 224
PO5 MBA 224
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 1 2 3
CO2 3 3 2 1 3
CO3 2 2 2 3 2
Course Cos
Course Outcomes
WORKING
CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 224)
CO1 Evaluate the comparative working capital management policies
and their impact on the firm's profitability and liquidity.
CO2 Evaluate the effective receivables, inventory and cash
management and its role in meeting the firm's strategic
objectives.
CO3 Evaluate short term sources of working capital and manage the
payables of the company
Department of Business Administration Page 251
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran
Rafiq
22.8 31 73.66 3 Y 21.0 29 72.53 3 Y 21.1 30 70.44 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
23.6 31 76.24 3 Y 22.0 29 75.75 3 Y 22.4 30 74.67 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 26.8 31 86.56 3 Y 24.5 29 84.48 3 Y 24.7 30 82.22 3 Y
Average 3 Average 3 3
31806105
APARNA MISHRA
6
15
40.00
1
N
15
25
60.00
3
Y
Department of Business Administration Page 252
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 66.7 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 100.0
CO3 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 100.0 66.7
Avg. 89 77.8 55.6 66.7 88.9
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 92.9 92.9 61.9 31.0 61.9 92.9
CO2 92.9 92.9 92.9 61.9 31.0 92.9
CO3 85.7 57.1 57.1 57.1 85.7 57.1
CO4 92.9 81 70.6 50.0 59.5 81.0
Avg.
92.9 61.9 31.0 61.9 92.9
Department of Business Administration Page 253
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.7 95.7 63.8 31.9 63.8 95.7
CO2 95.7 95.7 95.7 63.8 31.9 95.7
CO3 95.7 63.8 63.8 63.8 95.7 63.8
CO4 95.7 85 74.4 53.1 63.8 85.0
Avg.
95.7 63.8 31.9 63.8 95.7
Subject Name & code: Derivatives Management MBA-234
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course Cos Course Outcomes
DERIVATIVES
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 234)
CO1 Provide a detailed explanation of hedging financial
instruments such as options, futures, swaps and other
derivative securities and describe the economic
environment in which such instruments operate
CO2 Develop and employ theoretical valuation methods to
price these hedging financial instruments.
CO3 Apply these instruments in managing the risk of
investing and hedging activity at the individual and the
corporate level.
Department of Business Administration Page 254
MBA 234
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 234
PO2 MBA 234
PO3 MBA 234
PO4 MBA 234
PO5 MBA 234
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2 3 2
CO2 2 2 1 2 2
CO3 1 2 1 2 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 255
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Name CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 25.1 31 80.97 3 Y 23.3 29 80.23 3 Y 23.6 30 78.78 3 Y 2 41710030 Shubham
Kumar
24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 23.3 29 80.46 3 Y 24.4 30 81.22 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 24.8 31 80.11 3 Y 23.2 29 80.00 3 Y 24.0 30 79.89 3 Y
Average 3 Average 3 2.17
Department of Business Administration Page 256
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 100.0 66.7
CO2 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 33.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 66.7
Avg. 56 66.7 44.4 77.8 66.7
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 100.0 66.7
CO2 92.9 61.9 61.9 31.0 61.9 61.9
CO3 100.0 33.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 66.7
Avg.
54 65.1 43.7 76.2 65.1
Department of Business Administration Page 257
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.9 60.6 60.6 60.6 90.9 60.6
CO2 95.5 63.6 63.6 31.8 63.6 63.6
CO3 90.9 30.3 60.6 30.3 60.6 60.6
Avg.
52 61.6 40.9 71.7 61.6
Subject Name & code: Microfinance MBA-244
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Course MBA -
244 Cos
Course Outcomes
MICROFINANCE
(MBA 244) CO1
Understand the concept of microfinance, models and their
applications in national and international context.
CO2 Providing knowledge of major initiatives taken by the
government in the area of microfinance
CO3 Developing the understanding of the legal and regulatory
framework of the microfinance industry and their performance
measuring models.
Department of Business Administration Page 258
MBA-244
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA - 244
PO2 MBA - 244
PO3 MBA - 244
PO4 MBA - 244
PO5 MBA - 244
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 1 3 2 3
CO2 3 1 2 1 3
CO3 1 3 3 3 3
Step 3 Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 259
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO M
M
%
age
Scor
e
Y/
N
MO M
M
%
age
Scor
e
Y/
N
MO M
M
%
age
Scor
e
Y/
N
1 4171000
9
Imran Rafiq 24.
0
31 77.5
3
3 Y 22.
7
29 78.3
9
3 Y 23.
2
30 77.4
4
3 Y
2 4171003
0
Shubham
Kumar
24.
5
31 78.9
2
3 Y 23.
0
29 79.4
3
3 Y 23.
5
30 78.3
3
3 Y
3 4171005
5
Ankur 24.
2
31 77.9
6
3 Y 22.
6
29 78.0
5
3 Y 23.
2
30 77.3
3
3 Y
Average
3.00
3.00
3.00
Department of Business Administration Page 260
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in the
COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5 Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 66.7 33.3 100.0 66.7 100.0
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 33.3 66.7 33.3 100.0
CO3 100.0 100.00 33.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Avg 100 67 55.6 88.9 66.7 100.0
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.4 71.43 47.6 23.8 71.4 47.6 71.4
CO2 64.3 64.29 64.3 21.4 42.9 21.4 64.3
CO3 64.3 64.29 21.4 64.3 64.3 64.3 64.3 Avg 67 44 36.5 59.5 44.4 66.7
Department of Business Administration Page 261
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.5 95.45 63.6 31.8 95.5 63.6 95.5
CO2 95.5 95.45 95.5 31.8 63.6 31.8 95.5
CO3 95.5 95.45 31.8 95.5 95.5 95.5 95.5 Avg 95 64 53.0 84.8 63.6 95.5
Subject Name & code: Commercial Bank Management MBA-254
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA254
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA-254
PO2 MBA-254
PO3 MBA-254
PO4 MBA-254
PO5 MBA-254
Course Cos Course Outcomes
COMMERCIAL
BANK
MANAGEMENT
(MBA-254)
CO1 Evaluate the role of banking in the economy, their
structure, and the regulatory environment in which
they operate
CO2 Demonstrate the analytical foundations related to the
asset-liability management (ALM) of Banks, the risks
involved, and the impact on the valuation
CO3 Evaluate the management of the lending, investment
and trading activities, the related risks and the
management of these risks
Department of Business Administration Page 262
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 1 1 1
CO2 1 3 1 2 2
CO3 3 1 1 1 3
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 263
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710009 Imran Rafiq 25.9 31 83.55 3 Y 24.2 29 83.45 3 Y 24.9 30 83.00 3 Y
2 41710030 Shubham Kumar 25.6 31 82.58 3 Y 23.8 29 82.07 3 Y 24.6 30 82.00 3 Y
3 41710055 Ankur 26.8 31 86.56 3 Y 25.2 29 86.78 3 Y 26.0 30 86.67 3 Y
Average 3.00 3.00 3.00
Department of Business Administration Page 264
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE
ON SCALE
OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained
from the
above table) 3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt to set
target level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 33.3 33.3
CO2 100.0 33.3 100.0 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 100.0
Avg. 100 67 66.7 33.3 44.4 66.7
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO
attainment
wrt to set
target level of
CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.00 66.7 66.7 33.3 33.3 33.3
CO2 100.00 33.3 100.0 33.3 66.7 66.7
CO3 92.86 92.9 31.0 31.0 31.0 92.9
Avg. 98 64 65.9 32.5 43.7 64.3
Department of Business Administration Page 265
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt to set target
level of CO
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 95.65 63.8 63.8 31.9 31.9 31.9
CO2 95.65 31.9 95.7 31.9 63.8 63.8
CO3 95.65 95.7 31.9 31.9 31.9 95.7
Avg. 96 64 63.8 31.9 42.5 63.8
Subject Name & code: Retail Management MBA-216
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
Pos Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 216
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 216
PO2 MBA 216
PO3
PO4 MBA 216
PO5 MBA 216
Course Cos Course Outcomes
RETAIL
MANAGEMENT
(MBA 216)
CO1 To empower the students with an understanding of the operations
of retail outlets
CO2 To make the students learn how creativity in retailing is used for
sales
CO3 To let them know about social viability of the business and how to
design a retail outlet to control the business better and offer more
in less space.
Department of Business Administration Page 266
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 2 2 2
CO2 2 2
CO3 1 2 2
CO4 2 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 267
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
S.
No
Roll No CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 23.3 31 75.05 3 Y 21.5 29 74.02 3 Y 21.3 30 70.89 3 Y
2 41710004 19.3 31 62.37 2 N 18.1 29 62.41 2 N 18.6 30 61.89 2 N
3 41710007 22.0 31 70.97 3 Y 20.0 29 68.85 3 Y 20.0 30 66.78 3 Y
4 41710026 23.5 31 75.86 3 Y 21.3 29 73.56 3 Y 21.2 30 70.50 3 Y
5 41710027 21.2 31 68.39 3 Y 19.4 29 66.78 3 Y 19.4 30 64.78 2 N
6 41710029 21.7 31 70.11 3 Y 20.2 29 69.77 3 Y 21.0 30 70.11 3 Y
7 41710034 24.0 31 77.47 3 Y 22.2 29 76.55 3 Y 22.8 30 75.94 3 Y
8 41710051 20.1 31 64.95 2 N 18.7 29 64.48 2 N 19.2 30 63.89 2 N
9 41710054 22.7 31 73.12 3 Y 20.3 29 70.11 3 Y 20.0 30 66.67 3 Y
10 41710057 20.3 31 65.38 3 Y 18.7 29 64.60 2 N 19.0 30 63.33 2 N
11 41710076 17.3 31 55.91 2 N 16.5 29 56.78 2 N 17.2 30 57.33 2 N
12 41710077 22.9 31 73.98 3 Y 20.3 29 69.89 3 Y 19.8 30 66.00 3 Y
13 41710079 26.7 31 86.24 3 Y 24.6 29 84.83 3 Y 24.7 30 82.22 3 Y
14 41710082 0.0 31 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 30 0.00 1 N
Department of Business Administration Page 268
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 1 point in
the COs)
CO1 2.64 71.43 21.43 7.14
CO2 2.57 64.29 28.57 7.14
CO3 2.50 57.14 35.71 7.14
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 71.43 71.43 47.62 47.62
47.62
CO2 64.29 64.29 42.86
42.86
CO3 57.14 57.14 19.05
38.10 38.10
Avg 64.29 36.51 47.62
40.48 42.86
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 80.95 80.95 53.97 53.97 0.00 53.97
CO2 80.95 80.95 53.97 0.00 53.97 0.00
CO3 80.95 80.95 26.98 0.00 53.97 53.97
Avg 80.95 44.97 53.97 53.97 53.97
Department of Business Administration Page 269
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.00 100.00 66.67 66.67
66.67
CO2 100.00 100.00 66.67
66.67
CO3 100.00 100.00 33.33
66.67 66.67
Avg 100.00 55.56 66.67
66.67 66.67
Subject Name & code: Relationship Marketing MBA-226
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 226
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 226
PO2
PO3 MBA 226
PO4 MBA 226
PO5 MBA 226
Course Cos Course Outcomes
RELATIONSHIP
MARKETING
(MBA 226)
CO1 Analysing relationship theory and relationship economics from the
point of view of the customer and the organisation.
CO2 Exploring an organisation's relational strategies with different
stakeholder groups.
CO3 Knowledge to formulate and assess strategic, operational and
tactical CRM decisions as well.
Department of Business Administration Page 270
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 3 2 2
CO2 2 2 1 2
CO3 2 2 1 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Department of Business Administration Page 271
Table No 3
S. No Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 25.8 31 83.12 3 Y 24.4 29 84.14 3 Y 25.3 30 84.44 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 21.9 31 70.65 3 Y 20.7 29 71.49 3 Y 21.4 30 71.22 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 23.9 31 77.20 3 Y 21.3 29 73.33 3 Y 20.3 30 67.67 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 21.1 31 68.06 3 Y 19.5 29 67.24 3 Y 19.9 30 66.33 3 Y
5 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 23.5 31 75.81 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.2 30 73.89 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 22.0 31 71.08 3 Y 21.0 29 72.30 3 Y 22.0 30 73.33 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 24.7 31 79.68 3 Y 22.5 29 77.47 3 Y 22.3 30 74.44 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 23.5 31 75.81 3 Y 21.1 29 72.76 3 Y 20.9 30 69.67 3 Y
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 25.9 31 83.66 3 Y 24.0 29 82.87 3 Y 24.5 30 81.78 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 21.4 31 68.92 3 Y 20.1 29 69.43 3 Y 20.5 30 68.33 3 Y
11 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 20.8 31 67.20 3 Y 18.6 29 64.25 3 Y 18.0 30 60.11 3 Y
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 21.0 31 67.63 3 Y 20.1 29 69.31 3 Y 20.9 30 69.78 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 27.9 31 90.00 3 Y 25.8 29 88.85 3 Y 26.3 30 87.78 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 0.0 31 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 30 0.00 1 N
Average 2.86 2.86
Department of Business Administration Page 272
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 2
point in the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.86 92.86 0.00 7.14
CO2 2.86 92.86 0.00 7.14
CO3 2.86 92.86 0.00 7.14
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of
CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 92.9 92.86 92.9 92.9 61.9 61.9
CO2 92.9 92.86 61.9 61.9 31.0 61.9
CO3 92.9 92.86 61.9 61.9 31.0 61.9 Avg 93 72 72.2 41.3 61.9
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.5 90.48 90.5 90.5 60.3 60.3
CO2 90.5 90.48 60.3 60.3 30.2 60.3
CO3 90.5 90.48 60.3 60.3 30.2 60.3 Avg 90 70 70.4 40.2 60.3
Department of Business Administration Page 273
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt
set target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 66.7 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.00 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7 Avg 100 78 77.8 44.4 66.7
Subject Name & code: Marketing of Services MBA-236
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA236
PO2 MBA236
PO3 MBA236
PO4 MBA236
PO5 MBA236
Course Cos Course Outcomes
MARKETING OF
SERVICES (MBA
236)
CO1 Basic knowledge of marketing issues associated with service
gaps, perceived quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty
CO2 Apply relevant services marketing theory, research and analysis
skills to contemporary case studies and communicate outcomes
employing professional discourse and formats.
CO3 Conduct an investigation of service delivery systems, collecting,
analyzing data, and synthesizing information to provide valid
conclusions.
Department of Business Administration Page 274
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 2 1 2
CO2 3 2 2 1 2
CO3 2 2 2 2 2
CO4 3 2 2 1 2
Department of Business Administration Page 275
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N MO MM % age Score Y/N
1 41710001 24.8 31 80 3 Y 22.5 29 77.7 3 Y 22.7 30 75.56 3 Y
2 41710004 24.9 31 80.43 3 Y 22.6 29 77.82 3 Y 22.5 30 75 3 Y
3 41710007 23.6 31 76.13 3 Y 21.6 29 74.6 3 Y 21.8 30 72.56 3 Y
4 41710026 23.9 31 77.1 3 Y 22.4 29 77.13 3 Y 22.7 30 75.78 3 Y
5 41710027 24.7 31 79.68 3 Y 23 29 79.2 3 Y 23.3 30 77.78 3 Y
6 41710029 25 31 80.48 3 Y 22.9 29 78.97 3 Y 23.2 30 77.17 3 Y
7 41710034 27.2 31 87.85 3 Y 25.5 29 87.82 3 Y 26.3 30 87.67 3 Y
8 41710051 25.1 31 81.08 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 22.8 30 76 3 Y
9 41710054 26.3 31 84.95 3 Y 24.6 29 84.94 3 Y 25 30 83.44 3 Y
10 41710057 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 22.3 29 77.01 3 Y 22.4 30 74.56 3 Y
11 41710076 24.3 31 78.39 3 Y 22.3 29 77.01 3 Y 22.4 30 74.56 3 Y
12 41710077 25.2 31 81.4 3 Y 23 29 79.2 3 Y 22.8 30 76 3 Y
13 41710079 28.5 31 91.83 3 Y 26.5 29 91.38 3 Y 27 30 90.11 3 Y
14 41710082 0 31 0 1 N 0 29 0 1 N 0 30 0 1 N
Average 2.86 2.86 2.86
Department of Business Administration Page 276
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
(Obtained from
the above table)
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in
the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in
the COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.86 92.86 0 7.14
CO2 2.86 92.86 0 7.14
CO3 2.86 92.86 0 7.14
Table No 5 (2018-2019)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 92.9 92.86 92.9 61.9 61.9 31.0 61.9
CO2 92.9 92.86 92.9 61.9 61.9 31.0 61.9
CO3 92.9 92.86 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 Avg 93 83 61.9 61.9 41.3 61.9
Table 5 (2019-2020)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 23.8 23.81 23.8 15.9 15.9 7.9 15.9
CO2 52.4 52.38 52.4 34.9 34.9 17.5 34.9
CO3 52.4 52.38 34.9 34.9 34.9 34.9 34.9 Avg 43 37 28.6 28.6 20.1 28.6
Table 5 (2020-2021)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7
CO2 100.0 100.00 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3 66.7
CO3 100.0 100.00 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 Avg 100 89 66.7 66.7 44.4 66.7
Department of Business Administration Page 277
Subject Name & code: Supply Chain Management MBA-246
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA-246
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 246
PO2 MBA 246
PO3
PO4 MBA 246
PO5 MBA 246
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 1
CO2 2 3 1
CO3 3 2
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
Course Cos Course Outcomes
SUPPLY CHAIN
MANAGEMENT
(MBA246)
CO1 Ability to examine the design and performance of supply
networks and processes in different business contexts.
CO2 Develop capabilities in forecasting, coordination for
supply chain integration, inventory management,
procurement, JIT, product and process design,
CO3 Understanding of global supply chain management.
Department of Business Administration Page 278
Table No 3
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 26.3 31 84.95 3 Y 24.5 29 84.37 3 Y 24.7 30 82.33 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 23.2 31 74.95 3 Y 21.8 29 75.29 3 Y 22.4 30 74.78 3 Y
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar
Bajpai
21.6 31 69.78 3 Y 19.8 29 68.28 3 Y 19.6 30 65.22 3 Y
4 41710026 Sushobhan 23.1 31 74.52 3 Y 20.0 29 68.85 3 Y 18.9 30 63.11 3 Y
5 41710027 Ashish
Aggarwal
24.7 31 79.68 3 Y 23.5 29 80.92 3 Y 24.3 30 81.11 3 Y
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 23.9 31 77.20 3 Y 21.4 29 73.68 3 Y 20.7 30 69.00 3 Y
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 25.0 31 80.54 3 Y 23.1 29 79.54 3 Y 23.5 30 78.22 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 20.8 31 67.20 3 Y 19.4 29 66.78 3 Y 19.3 30 64.33 3 Y
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 26.7 31 86.24 3 Y 24.9 29 85.75 3 Y 25.4 30 84.67 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh
Khorwal
21.9 31 70.65 3 Y 20.0 29 68.85 3 Y 19.6 30 65.44 3 Y
11 41710076 Samridh
Kumar Pandey
23.5 31 75.91 3 Y 21.3 29 73.45 3 Y 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 19.9 31 64.19 3 Y 19.4 29 67.01 3 Y 20.7 30 68.89 3 Y
13 41710079 Mansi 26.2 31 84.52 3 Y 24.7 29 85.06 3 Y 25.1 30 83.78 3 Y Average 3.00 3.00 3.00
Department of Business Administration Page 279
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
Table No 4
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the percentage of
students who have scored 3
point in the COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 2
point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of
students who
have scored 1
point in the
COs)
CO1 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO2 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
CO3 3.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 33.3
CO2 100.0 100.00 66.7 100.0
33.3
CO3 100.0 100.00 100.0
66.7
Avg 100 89 66.7
66.7 33.3
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 90.5 90.48 90.5 30.2
CO2 90.5 90.48 60.3 90.5
30.2
CO3 90.5 90.48 90.5
60.3
Avg 90 80 60.3
60.3 30.2
Department of Business Administration Page 280
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment
wrt set target
level of CO
Limit to max
value of CO
attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.0 100.00 100.0 33.3
CO2 100.0 100.00 66.7 100.0
33.3
CO3 86.7 86.67 86.7
57.8
Avg 96 84 66.7
57.8 33.3
Subject Name & code: Emerging Concepts in Marketing-II MBA-256
Prepare faculty course assessment record (FCAR) of each faculty.
Align or distribute result of CO attainment (in %) over PO’s as per already done CO-PO mapping.
Prepare PO attainment sheet (in %) on the basis of weighted average of exit survey and employer
survey
Calculate the final PO attainment.
2.2.2 Pos attainment levels with observations (40)
POs Attainment
Step 1
There are 5 POs for the PG Program. Please mention which of the POs match with the course
taught by you. For example, if the subject is M661 and it justifies all POs except PO5, then write
the course no of the subject in all POs except PO5.
MBA 256
Table No 1
POs Course
PO1 MBA 256
PO2
PO3 MBA 256
PO4 MBA 256
PO5 MBA 256
Course Cos Course Outcomes
EMERGING
CONCEPTS IN
MARKETING-
II (MBA 256)
CO1 To make them understand the psychology of a customer better in
technicality and logically
CO2 To teach them the application of sustainable marketing techniques
in the favor of an organisation
CO3 To acquaint the students with the understanding of social factor
impact on customer psychology
Department of Business Administration Page 281
Step 2
Do mapping of all the COs of the course with the PO’s (On a scale of 1,2 & 3)
Table No 2
COURSE OUTCOME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 3 2 1 1
CO2 3 0 1 2
CO3 2 0 1 2
CO4 3 2 1 1
Department of Business Administration Page 282
Step 3
Align CO’s with questions of class tests, assignments and end semester exam
S.
No
Roll No Names CO1 CO2 CO3
MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N MO MM %
age
Score Y/N
1 41710001 Abdul Majid 18.7 31 60.27 2 N 18.5 29 63.68 2 N 19.9 30 66.17 3 Y
2 41710004 Sanchit Gupta 18.7 31 60.22 2 N 16.2 29 55.86 2 N 15.1 30 50.44 1 N
3 41710007 Yogesh Kumar Bajpai 17.2 31 55.48 2 N 16.9 29 58.28 2 N 17.9 30 59.67 2 N
4 41710026 Sushobhan 17.6 31 56.72 2 N 16.1 29 55.63 2 N 16.3 30 54.28 1 N
5 41710027 Ashish Aggarwal 20.0 31 64.57 2 N 18.5 29 63.91 2 N 18.5 30 61.50 2 N
6 41710029 Vipul Sen 20.5 31 66.18 3 Y 18.7 29 64.37 2 N 18.8 30 62.72 2 N
7 41710034 Shivi Jaiswal 23.0 31 74.14 3 Y 21.7 29 74.71 3 Y 22.4 30 74.50 3 Y
8 41710051 Aadi Singhal 18.5 31 59.57 2 N 17.9 29 61.84 2 N 18.6 30 62.00 2 N
9 41710054 Manvi Kapoor 22.9 31 73.76 3 Y 21.4 29 73.68 3 Y 21.8 30 72.56 3 Y
10 41710057 Viresh Khorwal 15.7 31 50.75 1 N 15.6 29 53.79 1 N 16.7 30 55.56 2 N
11 41710076 Samridh Kumar Pandey 15.6 31 50.32 1 N 15.2 29 52.53 1 N 16.2 30 53.89 1 N
12 41710077 Ayush Jha 18.8 31 60.70 2 N 18.2 29 62.64 2 N 19.0 30 63.39 2 N
13 41710079 Mansi 23.8 31 76.72 3 Y 22.6 29 77.93 3 Y 23.6 30 78.72 3 Y
14 41710082 Eeshan Rituaweik 0.0 31 0.00 1 N 0.0 29 0.00 1 N 0.0 30 0.00 1 N
Average 2.07 2 2
Department of Business Administration Page 283
Step 4
Mention the percentage of students who scored 3,2 and 1 points as per the COs of the course
CO Alignment
CO GRADING
AVERAGE ON
SCALE OF 3
DISTRIBUTION % AGE
(Obtained from
the above table)
3 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 3 point in the
COs)
2 (This is the
percentage of
students who have
scored 2 point in the
COs)
1 (This is the
percentage of students
who have scored 1
point in the COs)
CO1 2.07 28.57 50.00 21.43
CO2 2.00 21.43 57.14 21.43
CO3 2.00 28.57 42.86 28.57
Step 5
Distribute result of CO attainment (in % as mentioned in the above table) over PO’s as per
already done in the table no 2 of CO-PO mapping.
Table No 5 (2018-19)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 28.57 28.57 28.57
19.05 9.52 9.52
CO2 21.43 21.43 21.43
7.14 14.29
CO3 28.57 28.57 19.05
9.52 19.05
Avg 26.19 23.02
19.05 8.73 14.29
Table No 5 (2019-20)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 85.71 85.71 85.71 57.14 28.57 28.57
CO2 80.95 80.95 80.95 26.98 53.97
CO3 80.95 80.95 53.97 26.98 53.97
Avg 82.54 73.54 57.14 27.51 45.50
Table No 5 (2020-21)
CO CO attainment wrt set
target level of CO
Limit to max value
of CO attainment
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5
CO1 100.00 100.00 100.00 66.67 33.33 33.33
CO2 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 33.33 66.67
CO3 100.00 100.00 66.67 0.00 33.33 66.67
Avg 100.00 88.89 66.67 33.33 55.56
Department of Business Administration Page 284
CRITERIA 4: CURRICULUM AND LEARNING PROCESS (125)
4.1 Curriculum (40)
4.1.1 State the process for designing the program curriculum (10)
The NIT is an autonomous Institution of National Importance. All the procedures are centralised.
The President is the topmost authority in hierarchy followed by MHRD. SENATE assigns the task
of designing program curriculum to the Board of Studies (BOS). The BOS decides the program
for MBA in consultation with the SENATE Program curriculum is sent to SENATE for final
approval.
EXISTING
SYLLABUS
2018-19
GAP ANALYSIS BY
DEPT CURRICULUM
COMMITTEE
Program Outcomes OR
POs OF MBA program
with three streams
CURRICULUM COMMITTEE-DEPT OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION IN CONSULTATION WITH STAKE HOLDERS
DRAFT CURRICULUM 2019-20
COMPLIANT WITH NBA REQUIREMENTS
BOARD OF STUDIES
APPROVES
NIT SENATE APPROVES
INTERNAL
AND
EXTERNAL
STAKE
HOLDERS
STAKE HOLDERS DOWNLOAD FOR
IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE REVIEWS
CURRICULUM PUBLISHED ON WEBSITE
Department of Business Administration Page 285
After SENATE’s approval, the curriculum is published on NIT’s website for implementation.
Stake holders are expected to keep on giving feedback for continuous improvements in the
curriculum.
4.1.2 Structure of the Curriculum (10)
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA –
101
Principles& Practices of
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
103
Organization Behavior 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
105
Managerial Economics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
107
Accounting for Managers 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
109
Business Environment 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
111
Soft Skills Development 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
113
Business Statistics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
115
Computer Application in
Management
2 0 2 4 3.0
MBA -
102
Financial Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
104
Human Resource
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
106
Production & Operation
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
108
Marketing Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
110
Total Quality Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
112
Business Ethics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
114
Research Methodology 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
116
Management Information
System
3 1 0 4 3.5
Department of Business Administration Page 286
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA-
201
International Business 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
203
Business Law & Corporate
Taxation
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
205
Entrepreneurship
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
211
Labour Laws 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
221
Organizational Change and
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
231
Management Training and
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
241
Counselling Skills for
Managers
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
251
Performance Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
213
Financial Institution &
Markets
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
223
Merchant Banking &
Financial Services
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
233
Security Analysis & Portfolio
Management.
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
243
Insurance and Risk
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
253
Project Finance 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
215
Integrated Marketing
Communication
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
225
Sales & Distribution
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
235
Product & Brand Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
245
Consumer Behaviour 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
255
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
207
Summer Training Report 4.0
MBA -
202
Strategic Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
Department of Business Administration Page 287
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA -
204
Digital Marketing and E-
Commerce
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
206
Dissertation Project 6.0
MBA -
212
Human Resource
Development: Strategies and
Systems
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
222
Dynamics of Industrial
Relations
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
232
Interpersonal & Group
Dynamics
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
242
Compensation Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
252
Cross Cultural Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
214
International Financial
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
224
Working Capital Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
234
Derivatives Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
244
Microfinance 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
254
Commercial Bank
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
216
Retail Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
226
Relationship Marketing 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
236
Marketing of Services 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
246
Supply Chain Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
256
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing
3 1 0 4 3.5
Total 200 188
#Seminar, project works may be considered as practical
Department of Business Administration Page 288
4.1.3 State the components of the curriculum (15)
Program curriculum grouping based on course components
Course component Curriculum Content
(% of total number of
credits of the program
Total number of
contact hours
Total number of
credits
Program Core 37.234% 70*4=280 (7+8+3+2=20*3.5)
=70
Program Electives 55.851% 105*4==420 30*3.5=105
Open Electives Nil Nil Nil
Summer Project/
Internship/Seminars
2.127% 4 1*4.0=4.0
Final Dissertation 3.191% 4 1*6=6
Any other (Specify)
Practical
1.595% 4 3
Total number of credits 100.00% 712 188
The Department provides three specializations having 5 courses each in 3rd and 4th sem (of 3.5
credit each). The student opts for any one specialization and studies 5 courses (of 3.5 credit each)
in each of the 3rd and 4th sem.
4.1.4 Overall quality and level of program curriculum (15)
The assessment scheme for each course is as follows.
Mid-term1 - 15 marks
Mid-term 2 - 15 marks
Class participation – 10 marks (Class participation includes presentations, assignments,
role play exercises, management games, Case Studies and other activities etc. the Faculty
members shall share the evaluation criterion with the students at the beginning of the
session)
Attendance - 10 marks
End term - 50 marks
For seminar and dissertation, the assessment is done on hundred marks. For Computer Application
in Management (CAM) the assessment scheme is as follows.
Mid-term1 - 15 marks
Mid-term 2 - 15 marks
Class participation - 20 marks (Class participation includes assignments and practical
demonstrations of various practical problems)
Attendance - 10 marks
End term - 40 marks
Department of Business Administration Page 289
The class participation mark is decided based on the various activities conducted by the faculties
such as quiz, role play, games, assignments, presentation etc.
The class participation marks are solely decided by the teacher or the person in charge on the basis
of different activities like presentation, quiz, class tests, games etc.
4.1.5 State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes (10)
Being an autonomous institution, we design our own curriculum.
4.1.6 Appropriateness of the gaps identified and actions taken to bridge the gap (15)
Once the gaps are identified as per the attainment, following Steps are taken to bridge these gaps:
Quizzes
Class assignments
Industrial visits
Management games
Personality development courses
Student seminars
Guest lectures
Group discussions in class
Remedial sessions, etc.
The institution conducts quizzes on routine basis due to which students remain up to date with the
knowledge they are imparted in the regular classes. Class assignment allocation is done by
respective subject internal faculties and assessed by them. The frequency of class assignment is
decided by faculties after evaluation of data.
Industrial visits are conducted once in every semester to make studies aware about the external,
real world scenario. Management games and fests are conducted to impart creative thinking in
Sr.
No
Semester Internal assessment End term examination Total Credit
1 Semester1 410 390 800 27.5
2 Semester2 400 400 800 28
3 Semester3 400 500 900 32
4 Semester4 350 450 800 30.5
118
Department of Business Administration Page 290
students. Industrial professionals and veterans are invited to the institution to enlighten students
about various subjects and their dynamics. Guest sessions for personality development are
conducted on centralised platform for all the students.
Student’s seminar are also conducted two to three times in each semester. Group discussions are a
vital part of regular classes and is conducted at regular interval of time. The institutions have also
arranged for remedial classes for slow learning students, to clarify their concepts and help them
achieve good grades.
4.2 Learning Processes (75)
4.2.1 Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (20)
The department creates the academic calendar based on the institution academic calendar.
For each course the concern faculty creates a session plan and the same is shared with the
students.
Every faculty member shares PPT and their course related information to the respective
students. The students may assess the same through the mobile APP.
Course file are prepared by every faculty with course objective and outcomes.
A continues internal assessment process is in place for every course. Faculties use a variety
of techniques such as quiz, class test, case study, group discussion etc. to assess the
understanding of the student about the subject.
The institution provides adequate infrastructure such as ICT class rooms Wi-Fi well
equipped library to support teaching learning process.
Faculty use a number of student centric methodology such as student seminar, group
discussion etc.
Collaborative learning is encouraged for the students in a number of courses. While there
are number of courses such as dissertation, project etc., which are specifically focused
towards collaborative learning, other faculties also try to use collaborative learning as a
tool as a part of the course through various activities.
For improvement of teaching quality, institution has introduced a feedback system, where all
the students can give their feedbacks and suggestions. All the feedbacks received from the students
Department of Business Administration Page 291
are segregated and sent to respective faculties so that they can understand students’ point of view
and improve their teaching facilities.
Institution also uses social media as a platform to keep their students updated. WhatsApp groups
are created and all the notices, notes, assignments, case studies, session plans, timetables, etc. are
floated in that group. The students can also use the same platform to solve their queries and give
feedback to faculties.
The Session plan, internal marking and grading system are decided by the faculties. The
department is independent and faculties are free to decide and design it. Faculties can design their
session plan and float it out to students via favourable means. The faculties can evaluate students
according to their criteria and assign marks. All the internal marks for all the students are calculated
and uploaded on the software accessible by students. All the faculties are obliged to show answer
sheets, quiz papers, class assignment, etc. to students so that they can understand the evaluation
criteria properly. At the end of semester one final examination is conducted which has fixed
maximum marks.
For slow learners, institution has designed remedial classes that help them for final examination.
There are also mentors assigned to each student for consultation. Students that are in second year
are assigned as mentors to the students of first year so that they can take guidance during mentor-
mentee session or during informal meetings.
For advance learners, the institution facilitates them with advanced case studies and research
papers. They are given real life problems to solve and increase their intellect. These students are
also encouraged to participate in external inter college fests. These students can also publish their
papers in journals. There is a set criterion on which publication of their research paper is permitted.
The students who are in second year and have achieved A+ in their research papers can publish
them in journals.
4.2.2 Quality of continuous assessment and evaluation processes (40)
The institution employees’ number of direct and indirect techniques through internal assessment
and end term assessment to assess the performance of the students. The focus of the assessment is
to assess the competency of the students towards the attainment of the program outcome and course
outcome. The internal assessment consists of two mid-term examinations, marks for attendance,
Department of Business Administration Page 292
marks for class participation. Each faculty uses different techniques for assessment of performance
of the student for the class participation.
Each question in the internal assessment and end-term examination is mapped to course outcome.
The faculty ensure that all course outcomes are evenly covered through the mid-term examinations
as well as the end-term examinations. The institution uses an online software to calculate and
monitor the attainment of programme outcome and course outcome of the students.
Assessment rubrics are created by every faculty for indirect assessment. Assessment rubrics are
created individually for different set of activities.
Course exit Survey
Course exit survey is taken from every student on completion of the course and the same is used
as one of the indirect evaluation techniques for the general performance of the course.
For continuous assessment and evaluation, the institution conducts continuous internal
assessment as per the academic calendar. Also, various parameters like quiz, class test, class
presentation, assignments, etc. are used to assess the students. The students are also informed by
notice or circular prior conducting the above-mentioned.
For Short attendance, institution is very strict and specific. The attendance data is circulated and
displayed thrice in a semester. In the first notice, all the students who are having less than 75%
attendance are listed. As a process, the student and his/her parents are informed over telephonic
discussion. The second notice when rolled out, those from first list are monitored and if there is no
improvement in their attendance, the institution looks into each of them personally. It investigates
whether the student is a hosteller or a boarding student. They carry out all the investigation and
tries to regulate them using different methods like calling parents-teacher’s meeting, counselling,
etc. In the third list, the students who have attendance less than 65% are not allowed to attend the
final examination.
During Orientation program, all the students are informed about the institution, its grading and
assessment system, policies, placement facilities, infrastructure facilities, and other extra-
curricular activities that are conducted by the institution. Each student is also provided with a
handbook that included the program curriculum and academic calendar in it.
Department of Business Administration Page 293
Projects and Internship, All the students have to undergo one internship program after the
completion of second semester. This internship is generally of 6-8 weeks. The students have to go
to different industries and learn the work process of it. Some domain students also conduct survey
using questionnaire as survey tool and makes reports. The internship programs are compulsory
and is evaluated at the end of fourth semester. Internships are carried out under the guidance of
internal faculty; each student is assigned a faculty supervisor for projects to help the students
through. Final presentation is assessed by external examiner.
For Placements, the institution has set criteria. The students should have 7.5 CGPA, no backlogs
and obtained at least 60% marks in their 10th and 12th Board exam. The institution provides
centralised training and placement program to all the students. Institution also takes feedback on
placements and training programs from students to keep improving and bettering it with each
feedback. The institution also has an independent feedback system that takes a 360° feedback at
regular interval of time.
Department of Business Administration Page 294
4.2.3 Quality of Student Reports/Dissertation (15)
The primary focus for assessment of student report or dissertation is to ensure that the students
attain the competency related to the associated program outcomes. A number of parameters are
put in place to assess the quality of report such as
Clarity of project objective.
Clarity of methodology.
Clarity of steps.
Technical terms and tools used if substantial current and good quality literature cited.
Quality and clarity of research methodology.
The quality of bench marking tools used.
Interpretation of result and overall presentation of the report.
The quality of student’s reports is mainly dependent on the primary and secondary data that are
collected by the students. There are different criteria for each specialisation. For marketing and
Human Resource specialisation, the students mostly collect data using questionnaire as a survey
tool and presents it. For finance, however they work according to the company norms and policies.
To maintain the quality of reports, institution also checks Plagiarism in each report. The reports
that have plagiarism more than or 20% are not allowed to dissert. The institution uses Turnitin
software to check plagiarism. To assist students in carrying out a quality dissertation, each student
is assigned one faculty supervisor. Faculty supervisor checks the report on regular basis and makes
sure it is of a good quality. The students are required to make three copies of their reports, one is
for central library, second is for college records and third stays with students for their reference.
The institution is also facilitating students with a centralised library and along with this it also
provides full access to Capitaline software system. There are high-end journals and case studies
that are also available for them to explore and learn.
As a part of evaluation of dissertation, institute also conducts mock viva and presentations. The
final viva is however assessed by external examiners.
Department of Business Administration Page 295
CRITERIA 5: STUDENTS’ QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE (100)
Year Sanctio
ned
Intake
No. of students
admitted Tot
al
With
in
State
Outsi
de
State
Other
Count
ry
Managem
ent
Stream
Other
Strea
ms
Fresh
er
Experienc
ed*
CAY
2021-
22
53 M 14 22 0 6 30 32 0 36
F 3 5 0 1 7 8 0 8
CAY
m1
2020-
21
53 M 7 17 0 1 23 24 0 24
F 12 15 0 2 25 27 0 27
CAY
m2
2019-
20
53 M 10 7 0 1 16 17 0 17
F 22 8 0 6 24 30 0 30
CAY
m3
2018-
19
60 M 9 17 0 9 17 26 0 26
F 12 10 0 3 19 22 0 22
Total number of students
Admitted
186
Department of Business Administration Page 296
Table 5.1 - Student Intake
*Minimum 2 years
Year of entry Total number of students
admitted
Number of students who have
completed
I Year II Year
CAY
44 - -
CAYm1 51 46
2020-22
43
2019-21
CAYm2 (LYG) 47 42
2019-21
45
2018-20
CAYm3
(LYGm1)
48 42
2018-20
24
2017-19
CAYm4
(LYGm2)
26 24
2017-19
42
2016-18
Table 5.2 – Success Rate
CAY=Current Academic Year
CAYm1: Current Academic Year minus 1
CAYm2: Current Academic Year minus 2 = Last Year Graduate (LYG)
CAYm3: Current Academic Year minus 3 = Last Year Graduate
minus 1 (LYGm1) CAYm4: Current Academic Year minus 4 = Last
Year Graduate minus 2 (LYGm2)
5.1. Enrolment Ratio (Admissions) (20)
Enrolment Ratio= Number of students admitted/ Sanctioned intake
Item
(Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the last three years
starting from current academic year)
Marks
>=90% students enrolled 20
>=80% students enrolled 16
>=70% students enrolled 12
>=60% students enrolled 8
Department of Business Administration Page 297
Item
(students enrolled at the First Year
level on average basis during the last
three years starting from current
academic year)
Total Seat Total Admitted %
Year
2021-22 53 44 83.02
2020-21 53 51 96.23
2019-20 53 47 88.68
2018-19 60 48 80.00
2017-18 60 26 43.33
5.2. Success Rate (Students clearing in minimum time) (10)
S.I. = Number of students completing program in minimum duration / Number of
students admitted
Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 10 × Average SI
Item Last Year of
Graduate,
LYG
Last Year of
Graduate
minus 1,
LYGm1
Last Year of
Graduate
minus 2,
LYGm2
Last Year of Graduate
minus 3, LYGm3
Number of students
admitted
51 47 48 26
Number of students
who have
graduated in
minimum time
43 45 24
Success Index (SI) 0.914 0.937 0.923
Average SI 0.925
Success Rate 9.2515
5.3. Academic Performance (Percentage marks scored) (10)
Academic Performance = Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of final Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point
scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in final year/10)) x
(number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who have passed in all final year courses.
Department of Business Administration Page 298
Academic Performance Batch Batch
2018-20
Batch
2019-21 2017-19
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful
students (X)
8.28 7.96 8.30
Total no. of successful students (Y) 43 45 24
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 43 45 24
API = x* (Y/Z) 8.28 7.96 8.30
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3
8.18
5.4. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)
Assessment Points = 30 × average placement; N is the total no. of students admitted in first
year
Item CAY
(20-21)
(Batch
2019-21)
CAYm1
(19-20)
(Batch
2018-20)
CAYm2
(18-19)
(Batch
2017-
19)
CAYm3
(17-18)
(Batch
2016-18)
No. of students placed in companies
or Government Sector (x)
27 31 21 29
No. of students pursuing Ph.D. /
Higher Studies (y)
0 0 0
No. of students turned entrepreneur
(In the areas related to management
discipline) (z)
1 1
x + y + z = 27 31 22 30
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 62.79 68.89 88.00 68.18
Average placement= (P1 + P2 +
P3)/3
0.73
Assessment Points = 40 × average
placement
29.29
Department of Business Administration Page 299
5.4a. Provide the placement data in the below mentioned format with the name of the
program and the assessment year:
Batch 2015-2017:
Sr.
No.
Name Of The Student Placed Enrolment No. Name Of The Employer Id No.
1 Apoorva Mittal 4151003 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-01
2 G. Jyothi Ratnam 4151004 Om Careers Ltd. 15-Nitk-02
3 Manish Pahwa 4151007 Jaro Education 15-Nitk-03
4 Kanwaljit Kaur 4151027 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-04
5 Sneha Kahndelwal 4152011 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-05
6 Pradeep Malik 4151048 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-06
7 Mohit Deswal 4151024 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-07
8 Kanika Gambhir 4151047 Nc College Of Engineering 15-Nitk-08
9 Manish Dhiman 4151068 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-09
10 Arushi 4151002 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-10
11 Aastha Leekha 4152003 Nc College Of Engineering 15-Nitk-11
12 Sachin Yadav 4151023 Nc College Of Engineering 15-Nitk-12
13 Arvind Kumar 4152014 Tata Aia Life 15-Nitk-13
14 Neha Narula 4152016 Bajaj Alliance 15-Nitk-14
15 Gaurav Gupta 4151067 Hdfc-Amc 15-Nitk-15
16 Naveen Siwach 4151001 Higher Education 15-Nitk-16
17 Manjul Jain 4151062 Panicle Group 15-Nitk-17
18 Mehak 4151005 Higher Education 15-Nitk-18
19 Kunal 4151008 Higher Education 15-Nitk-19
20 Rahul Arora 4152001 Godrej 15-Nitk-20
21 Vishali Khurana 4152012 Eclerx 15-Nitk-21
22 Aman Sharma 4152013 Icici Bank 15-Nitk-22
Department of Business Administration Page 300
Batch 2016-18:
Sr. No. Name Of The Student
Placed
Enrolment No. Name Of The Employer ID No.
1 Yannu Narwal 41610001 HP Cotton 16-NITK-01
2 Ekta 41610003 NC College Of
Engineering
16-NITK-02
3 Ayush Sexena 41610004 Padmini VNA
Mechatronics Pvt. Ltd.
16-NITK-03
4 Anchal 41610005 Guru Nanak Khalsa
Institute Of
Technology And
Management-Technical
Campus
16-NITK-04
5 Harsimran Kaur 41610006 Rex Web Solutions 16-NITK-05
6 Rahul Yadav 41610026 Sandhar Technologies Ltd. 16-NITK-06
7 Deeksha Chopra 41610033 Jugnoo 16-NITK-07
8 Manish Rana 41610038 Zomato 16-NITK-08
9 Vatsal Deepak 41610078 Ernest & Young 16-NITK-09
10 Vaishali Garg 41610084 Swiggy 16-NITK-10
11 Ankita 41610085 Ilabz Technology 16-NITK-11
12 Anmol Gupta 41610007 FARMEX Agro Services
Pvt. Ltd.
16-NITK-12
13 Bhawna Singla 41610039 CA- Ankush Garg & Co 16-NITK-13
14 Nitesh Keshri 41610059 India Infoline Group 16-NITK-14
15 Khushboo 41610061 Intern Kings Services Pvt.
Ltd.
16-NITK-15
16 Hunny 41610064 HDFC Bank Ltd. 16-NITK-16
17 Parneet Kaur 41610087 Oppo Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. 16-NITK-17
18 Snehal Singha 41610013 Byjus 16-NITK-18
19 Syed Saqib Rizvi 41610028 Byjus 16-NITK-19
20 Neeraj Vats 41610053 Ernest & Young 16-NITK-20
21 Neha Yadav 41610057 Interactive Avenues 16-NITK-21
22 Madhumitha V 41610058 ABP News 16-NITK-22
23 Ujjwal Verma 41610060 Zomato 16-NITK-23
24 Mriganka J. Choudhury 41610076 Amul 16-NITK-24
25 Vishwajeet 41610077 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. 16-NITK-25
26 Mohit Kumar 41610079 India Bulls Home Loan 16-NITK-26
27 Chunar 41610089 Vivanta (By TAJ) 16-NITK-27
28 Sunny 41610011 Policybazaar.Com 16-NITK-28
29 Chinar 41610012 Touchstone Educationals 16-NITK-29
Department of Business Administration Page 301
Batch 2017-19
Sr.
No
Name Of The
Student Placed
Enrolment No. Name Of The Employer ID No.
1 Abdhul Majid 41710001 Learning Routes 17-NITK-01
2 Sanchit 41710004 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-02
3 Yogesh 41710007 Oyo 17-NITK-03
4 Sushobhan 41710026 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-04
5 Ashish 41710027 Extramarks 17-NITK-05
6 Pooja 41710028 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-06
7 Vipul 41710029 Udaan 17-NITK-07
8 Shubham Kumar 41710030 Business 17-NITK-08
9 Priya 41710031 Extramarks 17-NITK-09
10 Ekta 41710053 Honda Siel Power 17-NITK-10
11 Manvi 41710054 Lido 17-NITK-11
12 Ankur 41710055 S&P Global 17-NITK-12
13 Viresh 41710057 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-13
14 Samriddh 41710076 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-14
15 Ayush 41710077 Tech Mahindra 17-NITK-15
16 MANSI 41710079 Wurfel Kuche 17-NITK-16
17 Monika 41710081 Tech Mahindra 17-NITK-17
18 Imran 41710009 Rokhan Institute Of Higher
Education
17-NITK-18
19 Aadi 41710051 Info Edge 17-NITK-19
20 Nishu 41710058 Extra Marks 17-NITK-20
21 Shalini 41710078 Faculty At Institute Of
Engineering And
Technology, Lucknow
17-NITK-21
22 Rohit 41710083 Higher Education 17-NITK-22
Department of Business Administration Page 302
Batch 2018-20
Sr.
No.
Student Enrolment ID Employer ID No.
1 Aakash Singhal 41810016 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-01
2 Divam jain 41810021 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-02
3 Supriya Dogra 41810049 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-03
4 Himani 41810005 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-04
5 Vani 41810015 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-05
6 Archana Saini 41810047 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-06
7 Shubham singh 41810023 Crowe LLP 18-NITK-07
8 Nishant Sethi 41810029 Learning Lido 18-NITK-08
9 Vipin Tyagi 41810001 Learning Routes 18-NITK-09
10 Varun Bajaj 41810003 Wurfel Kuche 18-NITK-10
11 Shilpa Sharma 41810014 Tata Autocomp 18-NITK-11
12 Shivam Upadhyay 41810006 Learning Routes 18-NITK-12
13 Kumari Priya 41810044 Learning Routes 18-NITK-13
14 Tista Lather 41810004 Merkle Sokrati 18-NITK-14
15 Sunny Goyat 41810012 Wurfel Kuche 18-NITK-15
16 Diksha Singh 41810030 Wurfel Kuche 18-NITK-16
17 Amit Bhattacharjee 41810036 Wurfel Kuche 18-NITK-17
18 Meghav sharma 41810041 Wurfel Kuche 18-NITK-18
19 Karamveer 41810043 Byjus 18-NITK-19
20 Mohit bhambhani 41810048 Byjus 18-NITK-20
21 Megha 41810033 HDFC Bank 18-NITK-21
22 Ajay 41810037 Kotak Life 18-NITK-22
23 Udeshya kumar 41810010 Byjus 18-NITK-23
24 Jayesh vyas 41810040 Byjus 18-NITK-24
25 Sonali Goel 41810017 KPMG Global Services
Private
18-NITK-25
26 Shaleen Anand 41810042 K.K. University, Bihar 18-NITK-26
27 Siddharth Kumar 41810027 Diametriks 18-NITK-27
28 Manish Kumar
Tiwari
41810035 HDB Financial Services 18-NITK-28
29 Kumari Priya 41810044 Appy Pie LLP 18-NITK-29
30 Chahat Pundir 41810018 Byju’s 18-NITK-30
31 Madhurima Purohit 41810022 Byju’s 18-NITK-31
Department of Business Administration Page 303
Batch 2019-21
Sr.
No.
Student Enrolment
ID
Employer ID No.
1 Rachna 41910038 Pure Software 19-NITK-01
2 Rohit 41910046 Pure Software 19-NITK-02
3 Amandeep 41910044 Pure Software 19-NITK-03
4 Shailesh Bhardwaj 41910035 Deloitte, Bartleby 19-NITK-04
5 Surangama 41910031 Bajaj Allianz Life Kolkata 19-NITK-05
6 Kaushiky 41910017 Tech Mahindra 19-NITK-06
7 Prabhdeep 41910014 Tech Mahindra 19-NITK-07
8 Ashish 41910012 Crowe Horwath 19-NITK-08
9 Srishti 41910005 Crowe Horwath 19-NITK-09
10 Akanksha 41910001 Crowe Horwath 19-NITK-10
11 Ritika 41910020 S&P Global 19-NITK-11
12 Prabhleen 41910022 NTT Data Services 19-NITK-12
13 Parubal 41910025 NTT Data Services 19-NITK-13
14 Abhishek 41910043 Religare Broking 19-NITK-14
15 Priya Bansal 41910039 Exoedge 19-NITK-15
16 Shivangi 41910009 Nielsen 19-NITK-16
17 Bhaskar 41910030 Providentia Info Tech 19-NITK-17
18 Surbhi 41910015 Shadowfax 19-NITK-18
19 Lovepreet 41910034 Shadowfax 19-NITK-19
20 Shivani 41910049 Alumni Association, NIT KKR 19-NITK-20
21 Prakriti 41910032 Merkle Sokrati 19-NITK-21
22 Swati 41910028 Square Yards 19-NITK-22
23 Jatin 41910036 Abaca 19-NITK-23
24 Saksham Kukreja 41910010 ANZ Support Services( ANZSSI) 19-NITK-24
25 Savasi 41910041 Share India Delhi 19-NITK-25
26 Vamil 41910042 Boult Audio 19-NITK-26
27 Simran 41910004 Zomato 19-NITK-27
Department of Business Administration Page 304
Student Diversity (5)
Category 2021-22 2020-21 2019-
2020
2018-
2019
2017-
2018
Experience
More than 2 years 00 00 00 00 00
More than 1 year but
less than two years
00 00 00 00 01
Less than 1 year 00 00 00 00 01
No experience 44 51 47 48 25
Gender Girls 08 27 30 22 10
Boys 36 24 17 26 17
Diversity
Within state 17 19 32 21 12
Other state 27 32 15 27 14
Outside country 00 00 00 00 01
Qualifications
B.B.M/B.B.A 07 03 06 11 01
B.Com 06 21 23 14 08
B.C.A 00 00 00 00 01
B.Sc 09 10 06 05 01
B.E/B Tech 16 13 09 14 15
B.A 05 04 02 03 01
B.J.M.C 00 00 00 00 00
Other 01 00 01 01 00
Department of Business Administration Page 305
5.6. Professional Activities (15)
5.6.1. Students’ participation in Professional societies/chapters and organizing
management events (5)
All the students are encouraged to participate in extracurricular and co-curricular activities in intra
and inter NIT events and events organised by other institutions.
The details of participations and achievements in events are tabulated below:
S.
No
Academic
year
Name of the
student
Name of
Organisers/ Events
Activity Achievement
1 2018-2019 Karamveer
Swati
Himani
Priyanka
Nit Kurukshetra Business Plan 2nd position
2 2018-2019 Karamveer
Varun Bajaj
Swati Arora
Amit
Nit Kurukshetra Business Plan 1 position
3 2018-2019 1.Varun Bajaj
2.Karamveer
Sri Guru Nanak
Dev Khalsa
College, University
of Delhi
Startup Mania I position
4 2018-2019 Karamveer Nirma university
B plan 3rd position
5 2019 Surbhi
Lovepreet
singh
Techspardha, Nit
Kurukshetra
Ghostprotocol 1st position
6 2019 Surbhi
Pushpita
Shikha
Prabhdeep
Shailesh
Techspardha, Nit
Kurukshetra
Ad mad 1st position
7 2019 Amandeep
Sirohi
Techspardha, Nit
Kurukshetra
Corporate
Roadies
2nd position
8 2019 Ashish
Lovepreet
Rachna
Priya Bansal
Kaushiky
Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
AD-MAD 2nd Position
9 2019 Lovepreet
Singh
UTKARSH Singing 1st Position
10 2019 Ashish Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
Espirit-de-
corps
2nd Position
Department of Business Administration Page 306
S.
No
Academic
year
Name of the
student
Name of
Organisers/ Events
Activity Achievement
Lovepreet
Singh
Rachna
Shivangi
Priya Bansal
11 2019 Ashish
Rachna
Kaushiky
Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
All rounder 2nd position
12 2019 Puspita
Purkayastha
Confluence,NIT
Kurukshetra
Best Female
Model,Libas
Winner
13 2019 Puspita
Purkayastha
Confluence,NIT
Kurukshetra
Libas(Group
Performance)
2nd position
14 2019 Shikha
Puspita
Purkayastha
Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
Ghost Protocol 2nd position
15 2019 Surangama
Akanksha
Kyntiak
Nikita
Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
B PLAN 2nd position
16 2019 Ashish Techspardha,NIT
Kurukshetra
Future CEO 1ST Position
17 2019 Akanksha
Kyntiak
Prakriti
Confluence,NIT
Kurukshetra
Dum-C 2nd position
18 2019 Akanksha
Kyntiak
Prakriti
Confluence,NIT
Kurukshetra
BBS 2ND Position
19 2020 Nandini
Purohit
Finance club of
NIT Kurukshetra
Battle of
Article
3rd Position
20 2020 Udayna
Mohindroo
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Impiego 2nd Position
21 2020 Akshita
Mishra
Divya
Chaudhary
Silvia
Tarun Arya
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Case On Point 1st Position
22 2020 Devesh Mehra
Ridhi Kochar
Rishabh
Mahajan
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Case On Point 2nd Position
Department of Business Administration Page 307
S.
No
Academic
year
Name of the
student
Name of
Organisers/ Events
Activity Achievement
Udayna
Mohindroo
23 2020 Ridhi Kochar Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Corporate
Roadies
1st Position
24 2020 Gagan Panwar Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Corporate
Roadies
2nd Position
25 2020 Deepak
Yadav
Silvia
Tarun Arya
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
AD MAD 1st Position
26 2020 Neha Sachan Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Impressum 1st Position
27 2020 Silvia Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Debugmania 2nd Position
28 2020 Akshita
Mishra
Divya
Chaudhary
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Innovate for
India
2nd Position
29 2020 Deepak
Yadav,
Dhruv,
Praveen
Kumar
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Business Stars 1st Position
30 2020 Harish Kumar
Himanshi
Yashika
Mittal
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Business Stars 2nd Position
31 2020 Divya
Chaudhary
Altius, NIT
Kurukshetra
Aristotle 2nd Position
32 2021 Ridhi Kochar PRADARSHAN
(self-composed
poetry recitals)
DTU (formerly
Delhi College
of Engineering)
3rd Position
33 2021 Udayna
Mohindroo
Usha Pravin
Gandhi College of
Arts, Science and
Commerce
Photography
Competition
3rd Position
34 2021 Rishabh
Mahajan
Udayna
Mohindroo
Infusion, IIM
Rohtak
Jugaadu Fi 3rd Position
35 2021 Ridhi Kochar
Rishabh
Mahajan
Trishna, ICFAI
Business School
(IBS)
Excogitate 2nd Position
Department of Business Administration Page 308
S.
No
Academic
year
Name of the
student
Name of
Organisers/ Events
Activity Achievement
Udayna
Mohindroo
2021 Ridhi Kochar PRADARSHAN
(self-composed
poetry recitals)
DTU (formerly
Delhi College
of Engineering)
3rd Position
The department has conducted two-day Management Fest ‘VIHAAN’18’ on April, 12-13, 2018.
Here students from all over India from various educational institutions have participated in it.
5.6.2. Students’ publications (10)
S.
No.
Date of
Publication
Name of the
students
Name of the
publication
Title of the paper
1 Jan-June
2017
Mr. Naveen UGC referred
journals
‘Impact of Employees’ Perception
on Organisation Politics in Banking
Industry
2 May-June
2020
Himani Saini UGC referred
journals
‘Effectiveness of Employees
Psychological Ownership in
Selected Academic Institutions’
3 May-June
2021
Sanjoli Scopus ‘Micro Finance Institutions and
Woman Empowerment Trends and
Future Directions: A Bibliometric
Analysis’
Students’ Presentation
S.
No.
Date Name of the
students
Place of Paper
Presentation
Title of the paper
1 May- 21-24,
2021
Shailesh
Bhardwaj
International
Management
Conference
2021
Centre for
Management
Studies
Jamia Millia
Islamia. New
Delhi. India
Performance Comparison of
Automated Trading Systems (PROC.
PIVOT. Retracement Strategy) by
Means of Back Test on Zerodha
Streak.
2 May- 21-24,
2021
Lovepreet
Singh
International
Management
Conference
2021
An Analytical Study of Gold ETF
and its Impact on Indian Stock
Market
Department of Business Administration Page 309
Centre for
Management
Studies
Jamia Millia
Islamia. New
Delhi. India
3 May- 21-24,
2021
Sanjoli
Singla
International
Management
Conference
2021
Centre for
Management
Studies
Jamia Millia
Islamia. New
Delhi. India
A Bibliometric Analysis of Micro
Finance Institutions and Woman
Empowerment: Trends and Future
Research Directions
4 October 28-
30, 2021
Silvia Entente-2021
NIIT
University
Factors Influencing Customer
Decisions to Buy Green Lakes
Farmland
5 25-26
August 2021
Ms Ridhi
Kochar
Institute of
chartered
accountants of
India
Fund raising in the world of digital
finance from international markets
6 18-20
June2021
Ms. Udayna
Mohindroo
Mr. Rishabh
Mahajan
IIM-INDORE A Meta-Analysis Study to Evaluate
the Effect of Transformational and
Transactional Leadership on Job
Satisfaction
7 28-30 July
2021
Ms. Udayna
Mohindroo
Mr. Rishabh
Mahajan
NIT-Warangal Analyzing Product reviews from E-
commerce websites: Text analytics
and Sentiment analysis approach
8. 29-31 July
2021
Ms. Udayna
Mohindroo
BITS-PILANI Online learning and academic
performance: Mapping literature
through Bibliometric analysis
Department of Business Administration Page 310
CRITERION 6: FACULTY ATTRIBUTES AND CONTRIBUTIONS (220)
S.
No
.
Na
me
PA
N N
o.
Qu
ali
fica
tio
n
Area o
f S
peci
ali
za
tio
n
Desi
gn
ati
on
Da
te o
f J
oin
ing
Da
te o
n w
hic
h D
esi
gn
ate
d a
s
Pro
fess
or/
Ass
ocia
te P
rofe
sso
r
Cu
rren
tly
Ass
oci
ate
d
(Y/N
)
Na
ture o
f A
sso
cia
tio
n
(Reg
ula
r/C
on
tra
ct/
Ad
jun
ct)
If c
on
tra
ctu
al
men
tio
n F
ull
tim
e o
r P
art
tim
e
Da
te o
f L
eavin
g
(In
case
Curr
entl
y A
sso
cia
ted
is
“N
o”)
2018-2019
1. Dr. Rajender
Kumar
AIWPK468
0Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource &
General
Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Yes Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
AJKPK757
2J
Ph.D Marketing
Management
Associated
Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Yes Regular Full -
3. Dr.
Mohammad
Firoz
ALFPM803
0L
Ph.D Finance Assistant
Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Yes Regular Full -
4. Dr. Manish
Kumar Jha
AGNPJ750
8D
Ph.D Finance Assistant
Professor
16-12-2013 16-12-2013 No Regular Full 05-08-2018 (Lien)
5. Dr. Kranti
Walia
AAWPW36
63K
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
02-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full 08-02-2019
6. Mr. Rachin
Suri
CKBPS673
3H
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
7. Ms.
Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK865
2K
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
8. Dr. Neelam
Kaushal
AHOPN262
4C
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
9. Dr. Meenu
Saini
CHGPS052
9H
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
2019-20
1. Dr. Rajender
Kumar
AIWPK468
0Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource &
General
Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Yes Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
AJKPK757
2J
Ph.D Marketing
Management
Associated
Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Yes Regular Full -
3. Dr.
Mohammad
Firoz
ALFPM803
0L
Ph.D Finance Assistant
Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Yes Regular Full -
Department of Business Administration Page 311
S.
No
.
Na
me
PA
N N
o.
Qu
ali
fica
tio
n
Area o
f S
peci
ali
za
tio
n
Desi
gn
ati
on
Da
te o
f J
oin
ing
Da
te o
n w
hic
h D
esi
gn
ate
d a
s
Pro
fess
or/
Ass
ocia
te P
rofe
sso
r
Cu
rren
tly
Ass
oci
ate
d
(Y/N
)
Na
ture o
f A
sso
cia
tio
n
(Reg
ula
r/C
on
tra
ct/
Ad
jun
ct)
If c
on
tra
ctu
al
men
tio
n F
ull
tim
e o
r P
art
tim
e
Da
te o
f L
eavin
g
(In
case
Curr
entl
y A
sso
cia
ted
is
“N
o”)
4. Dr. Manish
Kumar Jha
Ph.D Finance Assistant
Professor
16-12-2013 16-12-2013 No Regular Full 05-08-2018 (Lien)
5. Mr. Rachin
Suri
CKBPS673
3H
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
6. Ms.
Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK865
2K
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
7. Dr. Neelam
Kaushal
AHOPN262
4C
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
8. Dr. Meenu
Saini
CHGPS052
9H
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
9. Prof Vikas
Chaudhary
Ph.D General
Management
Professor 01-08-2019 1-11-2017 No Regular Full
10. Dr. Geeta
Sachdeva
Ph.D Human
Resource
Management
Assistant
Professor
01-08-2019 1-11-2017 No Regular Full
11. Dr. Shabnam Ph.D Psychology Assistant
Professor
01-08-2019 1-11-2017 No Regular Full
2020-21
1. Dr. Rajender
Kumar
AIWPK468
0Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource &
General
Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Yes Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
AJKPK757
2J
Ph.D Marketing
Management
Associated
Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Yes Regular Full -
3. Dr.
Mohammad
Firoz
ALFPM803
0L
Ph.D Finance Assistant
Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Yes Regular Full -
4. Mr. Rachin
Suri
CKBPS673
3H
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
5. Ms.
Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK865
2K
MBA Marketing Assistant
Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
6. Dr. Neelam
Kaushal
AHOPN262
4C
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
7. Dr. Meenu
Saini
CHGPS052
9H
Ph.D Human
Resource
Assistant
Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
Department of Business Administration Page 312
Note: Please provide details for the faculty of the department, cumulative information for all the
shifts for all academic years starting from current year in above format in Annexure - II.
6.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (10)
No. of PG Programs in the Management Department/ Stand-alone Management institutes (m): 1
No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry students
2020-21 2019-20 2018-19
1st Year Students 53 53 60
2nd Year Students 53 53 60
Total Faculty (F) 7 10 8
SFR (S/F) 15.14 10.6 15
Average SFR = 13.58
Table 6.1.1
Note:
1. Minimum 75% should be Regular faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual Faculty as per
AICTE norms and standards.
2. The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of visiting/adjunct faculty,
whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive semesters in the corresponding academic year
on full time basis shall be considered for the purpose of calculation in the Student Faculty Ratio.
3. Depending upon the No. of programs in UG and PG the above table has to be updated
accordingly. For Ex: if UG=”0” and PG=”1”. The table may be prepared for only one PG
program.
4. Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 10 to a minimum of 5 for average SFR
between 15:1 to 25:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 25:1. Marks distribution is given as
below:
< = 15 - 10 Marks
< = 17 - 09 Marks
< = 19 - 08 Marks
< = 21 - 07 Marks
< = 23 - 06 Marks
< = 25 - 05 Marks
> 25.0 - 0 Marks
6.1.1. Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the format
mentioned below:
Total number of regular faculty in the
department
Total number of contractual faculty in
the department
CAY (2020-21) 3 4
CAYm1 (2019-20) 6 4
CAYm2 (2018-19) 3 6
Table 6.1.1
Department of Business Administration Page 313
6.2. Faculty Cadre (20)
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1
Student
Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 6.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 20:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 6.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply
with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 6.1
Year Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Required
F1
Available Required
F2
Available Required
F3
Available
CAY (2020-21) 1 1 1 1 3 5
CAYm1 (19-20) 1 2 1 1 3 7
CAYm2 (18-19) 1 1 1 1 3 6
Average
Numbers
RF1= 1 AF1=1 RF2=1 AF2= 1 RF3= 3 AF3 = 6
6.3. Faculty Qualification (15)
FQ =1.5 x [(10X +4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with
MBA, F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:20 Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no.
of students required are to be calculated as per 6.1)
X Y F FQ=1.5 x [(10X +4Y)/F)]
CAY (2020-
21)
6 1 5.3 18
CAYm1 8 2 5.3 25
CAYm2 6 2 5.3 19
Average Assessment 21
Department of Business Administration Page 314
6.4 Faculty Retention (15)
Total number of faculties in
Previous academic year
(CAYm1) (2019-20)
Total number of
faculties in the current
academic year (CAY)
(2020-21)
Number of faculties
Joined in CAY
(2020-21)
Number of faculties
left in CAY (2020-
21)
7 7 0 0
Faculty Retention Ratio = 100%
6.5. Faculty Initiatives on Teaching and Learning (10)
Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following
description.
Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student
learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery,
instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective,
efficient and engaging instruction. Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the
following criteria:
•The work must be made available on Institute website
•The work must be available for peer review and critique
•The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars
The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to
the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear
goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective presentation
and reflective critique
Item
(% of faculty retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year)
Marks
>=90% of faculty 15
>=75% of faculty 10
>=60% of faculty 8
>=50% of faculty 5
<50% of faculty 0
Department of Business Administration Page 315
The students of today are not keen in learning to what is taught to them, they want to know why they
should learn the particular part. The order of questions in the mind of the students of this era has shifted.
The first question in their mind is not ‘what’ any more its ‘why’. Why learning this particular thing is
important, what role this knowledge will play in their future. To build the attention of every student
department has entailed marketing concept in teaching, the teaching pedagogy is to promote the topic
by telling them the applicability of it in their future.
The beginning of every lecture is the most important constant, the normal lecture starts with the power
point presentation of the topic, and this has been changes by the department. The normal lecture now
starts with or entails in the middle role plays for better understanding. Role plays is making the student
feel the practical situation of the industry in the classroom, in the middle of a teaching session if the
same is implemented then this means the student engagement level grows higher than usual. For example
during the lectures of soft skill development the use of role plays while teaching the students the structure
of speeches, debate, interviews role plays are highly useful. At the time of interview, the student
performing the role of the interviewer understands that what the expectations of an interviewer while
interviewing them are.
This type of teaching emphasizes the development of analytical skills and critical thinking. These two
qualities is a must, inheriting these qualities ensures learning from every step in life whenever they will
come across any promotion or news or anything of remotely related to marketing in their life. The
student of management ultimately pursues diverse careers and the aim is also diverse. This kind teaching
style ensures the molding of every student in to a fine professional for their choice of field. Brain
storming during the session also creates an analytical thinking. This is used in the integrated marketing
communication lectures. In this the activity of advertising dissection is done by the students. Under this
activity the students are dissecting the advertisement on the grounds of correct target audience, the
expense based on the length, the worth f the advertisement, them used is correct or not, attraction value
points, type of theme and appeal in the advertisement.
In all lectures the faculty aims to foster an interactive teaching environment. Every student is different
from the other and their way to adapt and grasp a course material is different, an interactive environment
in a lecture provides various platforms for learning. Feedback from student is continues process in
classes, it should be so that whatever problem they have now can be rectified at the same time. Designing
of mock session in the department helps in student analysis and on spot feedback. The department twice
Department of Business Administration Page 316
to thrice in a semester for the final year students, conducts the mock sessions according to the
specialization for various profiles. In these sessions a special file of the student is created and feedback
with creative criticism and solution is given to the student. Their progress is then tracked in the
subsequent sessions. This helps them prepare for the industry in a more practical way.
The department equips students for diverse opportunities and challenges they will face in their
professional lives. Emphasis on their impromptu skills and creativity outcome is made. It is important
for the student to adapt these two habits. For this the department conducts a special advertising campaign
in which the students not only designs the advertisements but also creates a company with compete
product offerings with a central theme and logo of the company. Students gets engorged in this activity
as they are suppose to create a practical campaign for the brand and advertisements are shot and designed
by the students. This ensures the students creativity skills to be sharpened an ready for the corporate
world.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY WORKSHOP CONDUCTED from June 2018 to June 2021
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Introduction to Research from June 19-20, 2021
Five weekend Online workshop on PLS-SEM-ANN in ITM Baroda from Feb 27-Mar 28, 2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Meta Analysis, Bibliometric Analysis and Meta-
SEM on Jan 23, 24 and 26, 2021
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on PLS-SEM using R-Studio from Jan 16-17, 2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Paper Writing, Model Robustness and WarpPLS
in KPB Hinduja College of Commerce Mumbai on Jan 08-10, 2021
Five-days faculty development Program on Multivariate Analysis in Fortune Institute of
International Business, New Delh from Jan 02-06, 2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Regression Analysis from Dec 25-27, 2020
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on EFA, CFA and CCA from Sept 26-27, 2020
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on R-Studio from Sept 19-20, 2020
Two-days Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Institute of
Management Studies, Lucknow University, Lucknow from Feb 29-Mar 1, 2020
Two-days FREE Workshop on Text Analysis using R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute of
Advanced Studies, Delhi from Feb 1-2, 2020
Department of Business Administration Page 317
Took Two-days Sessions in Seven days Workshop on Analytical Research techniques in RA
DAV College Mumbai from Dec 30-31, 2019
Six-days Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Ramanujan College,
University of Delhi from Dec 23 - 28, 2019
Three-day Workshop on Research Methodology in KES College Mumbai on Oct 31-Nov 2,
2019
Took Two-days Sessions in One week Short Term Course on Research Methodology, in UGC
HRDC GNDU Amritsar from Sept 14-15, 2019
Three-day Workshop on Research Methodology in SGT university Gurugram on Aug 31, Sept
7 and 28, 2019
Five-day Workshop on Multivariate Analysis Using R in PSIT College of Higher Education,
Kanpur from April 24 - 29, 2019
Took Two-days Sessions on Research Methodology in Seven days Workshop on Applied
Research Methodology in Social Sciences, in NIT Allahabad from June 17 to 23, 2019
Three-day FREE Workshop on R-Studio in DAV Centenary College, Faridabad, from June 14
- 16, 2019
Took Two-days Sessions on Research Methodology in Six days Workshop on Research
Methods and Business Analytics Using SPSS & R-Studio, in DIAS Delhi from June 7 to 8,
2019
Five-day Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Ramanujan College,
University of Delhi from April 16 - 20, 2019
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in Himachal Pradesh university, Shimla from Mar 22-
24, 2019
Five-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute of Advanced Studies, Delhi
from Feb 18-22, 2019
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar
from Nov 23-25, 2018
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology
(MNNIT) Allahabad from Oct 11-13, 2018
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Faculty of Management Studies, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi from Oct 08-10, 2018
Department of Business Administration Page 318
Three-day FREE Workshop on R and R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute of Advanced Studies,
Delhi from Sept 01-03, 2018
Took 2-day sessions in Five-day Workshop Selection of Appropriate Research Methods &
Data Analytics Using R in New Delhi Institute of Management, Delhi from July 17-18, 2018
Took 3-day sessions in Six-days FREE Workshop on Basics of Research Methodology in
CDAR, GNDU Amritsar from July 10-12, 2018
Five-day workshop on Advance Data Analysis Technique and Research Paper writing skills
in Chitkara University Punjab from July 2-5, 2018
Five-day workshop on Structural Equation Modeling in JIMS, Sector-5 Rohini, from June 26-
30, 2018
Five-day sessions on Microsoft Office Excel Training in Management Development Institute
(MDI), Murshidabad from June 20-24, 2018
Two-day workshop on In-Depth Learning of Appropriate Tools and Techniques for Quality
Research Papers in JIMS, Sector-3 Rohini, on June 15-16, 2018
Three-day workshop on Data Analysis using SEM & Panel Data in Maharaja Agrasen Institute
of Management Studies (MAIMS), Rohini Delhi from June 11-17, 2018.
Six-day workshop on Structural Equation Modeling using AMOS in Rukmini Devi Institute
of Advanced Studies, Rohini, Delhi from May 28-June 2, 2018
Department of Business Administration Page 319
6.6. Faculty Performance, Appraisal and Development System (10)
(Mention details such as program title, description, duration, resource person, type of training,
training methodology, participants, etc.). Mention details separately for the programs organized and
the programs participated outside the institution)
Sr. No Training
program title
Training institute
details
Duration/ dates Focus Name of the
faculty
1
IT Enabled
Learning for
STEM
Continuing
Education
Programme (CEP)
IIT Bombay
Three days
10/09/2018 -
12/09/2018
STEM Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
Expert Lectures
Sr.no Title of the professional
Development program
Resource Person Date
2018
1 Personality Development
Workshop
Prof. Pooja Khatari, IP University,
Delhi
February 2-3, 2018
2 Expert Lecture Shri R.S. Mor, District Development
Manager, NABARD, Kurukshetra
February 6, 2018
3 Management Games
Workshop
Dr. Ajay Sharma, Associate Professor,
TITS, Bhiwani
March 15, 2018
4 Two Days Workshop on
Personality Development
Program
Ms. Madhu Sharma, CEO, Success
Strategies for life
August 20-21, 2018
5 Expert Lecture on Motivation Mr. Sandeep Singh, Social Scientist September 19, 2018
6 Expert Lecture on Banking
and Related Terms
Professor T.J. Kamalanabhan, IIT
Madras
October 25, 2018
7 Expert Lecture on
Entrepreneurship
Development
Mr. Karthik K.S, Founder and Chief
Executive Officer of AEON
October 31, 2018
2019
1 Expert Lectures on Career
opportunities in Foreign
Chinmoy Ghosh, Professor of Finance,
University of Connecticut USA
January 4-7, 2019
Department of Business Administration Page 320
Sr.no Title of the professional
Development program
Resource Person Date
2 Expert Lecture on
Behavioural Finance
Dr. Satish Kumar, Associate Professor,
MNIT, Jaipur
January 24, 2019
3 Expert Lectures on
Entrepreneur-ship
Development
Mr. Tirthankar Goyal CEO Galilee
Management Institute Israel
January 25, 2019
4 Management Games
Workshop
Dr. Ajay Sharma, Assistant Professor,
TITS, Bhiwani
April 12, 2019
5 Guest Lecture on Motivation
and Self-Management
Mr. Nikhil, HR Consultant at three Six
Five Focus
August 01, 2019
6 Guest Lecture on NSE Mr. G.C. Sharma, Advisor of
Educational wing of NSE
August 28, 2019
7 Guest Lecture on CRM Prof. Alok Rai, Faculty of Management
Studies, Banaras Hindu University
September 9, 2019
2020
1 Expert Lecture on R-Studio
for Finance
Dr. Miklesh Yadav, Faculty Member,
Amity University, Noida
March 29, 2020
2 Expert Lecture on Quick
introduction to Python
Dr. Mihir Joshi, Assistant professor,
Faculty of Management Studies,
Gurukula Kangri Deemed University,
Haridwar 249404, Uttrakhand, India.
April 2, 2020
3 Expert Lecture on Artificial
Intelligence in Marketing
Dr. Brijesh Shivathanu, Department of
Business Administration, Sri Balaji
University, Pune,Maharashtra, India
April 3, 2020
4 Expert Lecture on HRM:
The untold Story
Prof. Puja Khatri, Professor GGSIPU,
Delhi
April 4, 2020
5 Expert Lecture on
visualization using Tableau
Mr. Parth Kaushik, Data scientist,
Forkaia, Irvine, California, USA
April 9, 2020
6 Expert Lecture on basic
understanding of Legal terms
Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Additional Advocate
General, Government of Hayana
April 9, 2020
Department of Business Administration Page 321
Sr.no Title of the professional
Development program
Resource Person Date
7 Expert Lecture on Digital
Marketing-Scope and Career
Opportunities
Dr. Arun Mittal, Faculty, Birla Institute
of Technology, Noida
April 20, 2020
8 Expert Lecture on Role of
HR in post COVID-19
Mr. Nikhil Mathur, General Manager
HR (Heading OD and Training) Dalmia
April 23, 2020
6.7. Visiting / Adjunct Faculty (10)
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in
teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment
years:
As of now, the department does not have the practice for the Visiting Faculty. However, the gaps
are fulfilled by the various Expert Lectures from Industry and abroad.
Visiting Faculty
S.No. Title of the professional
Development program
Name of Visiting Faculty Date
1 Expert Lectures on “KASH”
Model
Dr. Santosh Rangnekar Professor at
Department of Management Studies,
IIT Roorkee
March 1, 2019
2 Guest Lecture on Job
Description
D. Santosh Rangnkar, Professor at
Department of Management, IIT,
Roorkee
August 02, 2019
6.8. Academic Research (75)
• Faculty Paper Publication
(List of Publications in referred journals, reputed conferences, books, book chapters, case
studies in public domain etc.)
• List of Ph.D. /Fellowship titles (FPM) awarded during the assessment period while working in
the institute
All relevant details shall be mentioned.
Department of Business Administration Page 322
NATIONAL CONFERENCES/SEMINARS ATTENDED
Sr.
No
Title of the
Paper
Date Venue Organizer National/
International
Name of
the
Faculty
2018-19
1 Globalization and
Dimension of
Farmers’
Movement in
India
December
14-15th,
2018
22nd Annual
Conference of Indian
Political Economy
Association
(I.P.E.A.) organized
by Jammu
University, Jammu &
Kashmir
Jammu
University,
Jammu &
Kashmir
National Dr.
Rajender
Kumar
2 Political
Economy of
Emerging
Political,
Development and
Ecological
Challenges at the
National and
Global Levels
December
14, 2018
22ndAnnual
Conference of Indian
Political Economy
Association
(I.P.E.A.)
Jammu
University,
Jammu
National Dr.
Rajender
Kumar
3 A Study of NIRF
(National Institute
of Ranking
Framework) in
the context of
IIT’s and NIT’s
May 03-
05, 2019
Indian Institute of
Management, Indore
Indian
Institute of
Managemen
t, Indore
International Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
4 DRDO leading
India to Self-
Reliance in
Defense Sector
Nov 30-
Dec 02,
2018
Department of
Management Studies,
IIT Roorkee
Department
of
Managemen
t Studies,
IIT Roorkee
International Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
2019-20
Sr.
No
Title of the Paper Date Venue Organizer National /
International
Name of
the
Faculty
1 Existence of
Glass Ceiling in
Indian Education
Sector
April 26-
27, 2019
SRM University
Delhi-NCR, Sonepat
SRM
University
Delhi-NCR,
Sonepat
National Dr. Meenu
Saini
Department of Business Administration Page 323
Sr.
No
Title of the
Paper
Date Venue Organizer National/
International
Name of
the
Faculty
2 A Confirmatory
Factor Analysis
of Organizational
Effectiveness
Assessment
Instrument in
Banking Sector
May 17-
18, 2019
Chitkara University,
Punjab
Chitkara
University,
Punjab
National Dr. Meenu
Saini
3 A review of
investment and
exit pattern in
Venture Capital:
Evidence from
India
26 April,
2019
SRM University,
Delhi-NCR, Sonipat,
Haryana
SRM
University,
Delhi-NCR,
Sonipat,
Haryana
National Dr.
Mohamma
d Firoz
4 A Comparative
Analysis of
Perception of
Voters of
Haryana towards
the Brand
NAMO and
RAGA
26-27,
April2019
SRM University,
Sonepat, Delhi-NCR
SRM
University,
Sonepat,
Delhi-NCR
National Mr.
RACHIN
SURI
5 Impact of
Intellectual
capital on
Financial
Performance –
An Empirical
Study of the
Power Sector
April 26-
27, 2019
SRM University
Delhi-NCR, Sonepat
SRM
University
Delhi-NCR,
Sonepat
National Ms. Shelly
Gupta
6 An analysis of
Service failure
and recovery:
Evidences from
Hospitality
Industry
June 6-7,
2020
Chitkara Business
School, Chitkara
University Punjab
Chitkara
Business
School,
Chitkara
University
Punjab
International Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
2020-21
Sr.
No
Title of the Paper Date Venue Organizer National /
International
Name of
the
Faculty
Department of Business Administration Page 324
Sr.
No
Title of the
Paper
Date Venue Organizer National/
International
Name of
the
Faculty
1 A Meta-Analysis
Study to Evaluate
the Effect of
Transformational
and Transactional
Leadership on
Job Satisfaction
June 18-
20, 2021
Indian Institute of
Management, Indore
Indian
Institute of
Managemen
t, Indore
International Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
2 A Bibliometric
Analysis of
Stress on
Performance:
Status and Future
Research
Directions
May 21-
24, 2021
Centre for
Management Studies,
Jamia Millia Islamia,
New Delhi, India
Centre for
Managemen
t Studies,
Jamia Millia
Islamia,
New Delhi,
India
International Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
Books Published
Sr.
No.
Faculty Name Name of the Book Publisher Year ISBN
1
Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik
Business Research
Analytics
StarEdu
Solutions
2019
2
Dr. Neelam
Kaushal
Employee Training
and Development
Zohra
Publication,
Patiala Punjab
2017 978-93-
82376-
81-1
Department of Business Administration Page 325
Papers Published
Sr.
No.
Title of the Paper Date of
Publication
Journal Details Name of the
Faculty
1. Why consumer Buy Counterfeit
Products? AA Case study of the
Indian Clothing Industry
2018
Indian Journal of Marketing,
Vol. 48, p.p. no. 51-62,
ISSN0973-8703
Verma S, Kumar
Rajender, Yadav
S
2. Perceived Factors in
Professional Obsolescence: A
Qualitative Exploration of a
Government Research and
Development (R & D)
Organization
2018
Journal of the Indian
Academy of Applied
Psychology, Vol.44, p.p. np.
335-344, ISSN 0019-4247.
Kumar Rajender,
Singh AK,
Mukherjee A,
3. An Empirical Study on
consumers’ Buying Intension of
Counterfeit Products in India 2018
Journal of Journal of
intellectual property rights
(JIPR)
Kumar Rajender,
Yadav S &
Verma S
4. Intellectual property rights
protection and foreign direct
investment: a study of BRICS
countries
2018
World Review of
Entrepreneurship,
Management and Sustainable
Development, Vol. 14, no. 6,
2018, p.p. no. 694-704.
Kumar Rajender,
Sunil Yadav,
Saurabh Verma
5. An Empirical Analysis of the
Determinants of Phubbing
Behavior in India: The
Millennials Perspective
2019
International Journal of
Innovative Technology and
Exploring Engineering
(IJITEE)
Kumar Rajender,
Yadav S &
Verma S
6. Dimensions of service quality in
higher education – critical
review (students’ perspective)
2018
International Journal of
Educational
Management, 2018, 32(4),
pp. 580–605
Gupta,
P., Kaushik, N.
7. Employees' risk taking
capabilities and learning
organisation: Moderating role of
organisational size
2019
International Journal of
Knowledge and
Learning, 2019, 13(1), pp.
66–79
Budhiraja,
S., Malhotra,
M., Kaushik, N.
8. Changing patterns of the teacher
as a servant leader in Asia
Pacific: a review and research
agenda
2021
Asia Pacific Business
Review, 2021, 27(2), pp.
301–330
Khatri, P., Dutta,
S., Kaushik, N.
9. Use of 4.0 (I4.0) technology in
HRM: a pathway toward SHRM
4.0 and HR performance 2021
Foresight, 2021 Pillai, R., Yadav,
S., Sivathanu,
B., Kaushik,
N., Goel, P.
Department of Business Administration Page 326
Sr.
No.
Title of the Paper Date of
Publication
Journal Details Name of the
Faculty
10. Artificial intelligence and HRM:
identifying future research
Agenda using systematic
literature review and
bibliometric analysis
2021
Management Review
Quarterly, 2021 Kaushal,
N., Kaurav,
R.P.S., Sivathanu,
B., Kaushik, N.
11. Workplace ostracism in various
organizations: a systematic
review and bibliometric analysis 2021
Management Review
Quarterly, 2021, 71(4), pp.
783–818 Kaushal,
N., Kaushik,
N., Sivathanu, B.
12. Food Choice Questionnaire and
PLS-Path modeling as tools to
understand interest in low sugar
products 2021
Journal of Sensory
Studies, 2021, 36(5), e12667
da Veiga,
G.C., Johann,
G., Lima,
V.A., Kaushik,
N., Mitterer-
Daltoé, M.L.
13. Impact of climate change
disclosure on financial
performance: An analysis of
Indian firms
2018
Journal of Environmental
Accounting and
Management, 2018, 6(3), pp.
185–197
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
14. Corporate carbon intensity
matter: Predicting firms'
financial performance 2018
SCMS Journal of Indian
Management, 2018, 15(4),
pp. 74–84
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
15. Impact of carbon emissions on
cost of debt-evidence from India 2018
Managerial Finance, 2018,
44(12), pp. 1401–1417
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
16. What drives the Voluntary
Environmental Reporting
(VER): An examination of CDP
India Firms
2019
Journal of Environmental
Accounting and
Management, 2019, 7(1), pp.
47–59
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
17. How does capital market
respond to Certified Emission
Reductions (CERs)
announcements in India: An
event study methodology
2019 Managerial Finance, 2019,
45(7), pp. 950–965
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
18. Do investors' exhibit cognitive
biases: Evidence from indian
equity market
2020
International Journal of
Financial Research, 2020,
11(2), pp. 26–39
Sharma,
M., Firoz, M.
Department of Business Administration Page 327
Sr.
No.
Title of the Paper Date of
Publication
Journal Details Name of the
Faculty
19. Accounting for certified
emission reductions (CERs) in
India: An analysis of the
disclosure and reporting
practices within the financial
statements
2020
Meditari Accountancy
Research, 2020, 28(2), pp.
365–389
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
20. Carbon Credit Issuance:
Accounting Based Financial
Performance 2020
SCMS Journal of Indian
Management, 2020, 17(2),
pp. 111–119
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
21. Renaissance of alternate finance:
Bibliometric visualization of
private equity and venture
capital
2021
Journal of Wealth
Management, 2021, 24(2),
pp. 114–128
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
22. Venture capital: An analysis of
investment and exit patterns of
indian firms 2021
Journal of Alternative
Investments, 2021, 23(3), pp.
45–54
Kumar, P., Firoz,
M.
23. Workplace ostracism in various
organizations: a systematic
review and bibliometric analysis 2021
Management Review
Quarterly, 2021, 71(4), pp.
783–818
Kaushal,
N., Kaushik,
N., Sivathanu, B.
24. Artificial intelligence and HRM:
identifying future research
Agenda using systematic
literature review and
bibliometric analysis
2021 Management Review
Quarterly, 2021
Kaushal,
N., Kaurav,
R.P.S., Sivathanu,
B., Kaushik, N.
25. Microfinance Institutions and
Women Empowerment Trends
and Future Research Directions:
A bibliometric Analysis
2021
Library Philosophy and
Practice, 2021, 2021, pp. 1–
23
Kaushal,
N., Singla,
S., Jain,
M.R., Ghalawat,
S.
26. Nepotism Concept Evaluation: A
Systematic Review and
Bibliometric Analysis 2021
Library Philosophy and
Practice, 2021, 2021, pp. 1–
28
Kaushal,
N., Ghalawat,
S., Kaurav, R.P.S.
27. Development of the instrument
for psychological contract
effectiveness for service quality
in academic institutions
2021
International Journal of
Management Practice, 2021,
14(1), pp. 69–87
Kaushal,
N., Goyal, G.
Department of Business Administration Page 328
6.9. Sponsored Research (25)
Funded research from outside; considering faculty members contributing to the program:
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding Amount (Cumulative during CAYm1, CAYm2 and CAYm3):
Amount >= 30 Lacs 25 Marks,
Amount >= 25 and < 30 Lacs 20 Marks,
Amount >= 20 and < 25 Lacs 15 Marks,
Amount >= 15 and < 20 Lacs 10 Marks,
Amount >= 10 and < 15 Lacs 5 Marks,
Amount < 10 Lacs 0 Mark
Research and Consultancy Projects
Name of the
faculty
Project Title Project
Type
Funding
Agency
Amount Duratio
n
Status
Dr. Neeraj
Kaushik,
Dr. Rajender
Deswal
Correlation between psychological
and physiological parameters of
stress among staff and students –An
Empirical Study
Research
Project
DRDO 36,64,000 3 Years Ongoing
Dr.
Mohammed
Firoz
Capital Budgeting Practices in the
MSME’s
Consulta
ncy
Supreme
Steel
Industry
6,00,000 2 years Completed
Dr.
Mohammed
Firoz
Advisory Consultancy during
preparation of financial statement
Consulta
ncy
IIT
Patna
30,000 3
months
Completed
6.10. Preparation of teaching Cases (30)
(The development and use of cases in teaching and thus promoting learners critical thinking
skills)
The department emphasizes on the development of critical thinking of the students through various
activities in the class. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik, HOD, has a YouTube channel (more than 800+ videos,
15k+ subscribers, 1.8 million views) and a Google group containing on research tools and
methodologies, and case studies. Case studies has been made compulsory in many of the courses. All
faculties are encouraged to create case studies and use it as a teaching tool in the class.
Department of Business Administration Page 329
The department has a collection of case studies which the faculties usually refer to for creating case
studies for their subjects.
There is a process of creation of case studies. Although decentralization is practised in the department,
faculties usually consult with each other and often gets it reviewed by the HOD to ensure quality
teaching learning.
Department of Business Administration Page 330
CRITERIA 7: INDUSTRY & INTERNATIONAL CONNECT (130)
7.1 Industry Connect (90)
7.1.1 Consultancy (from industry) (25)
Paid Consultancy to Internal Department
As per the organisation structure of NIT each department is considered as separate unit. The
finance faculty of the department regularly renders service to the admin department for various
financial activities. The faculty gets paid an additional amount of Rupees 25 thousand every month
for such services. The other faculties of the department also work on various academic and
administrative activities of other departments.
Consultancy to Industries
Although there is no formal mechanisms to offer consultancy at the department level, the faculties
are engaged in various consulting activities for example: Mr. Rachin provides consultancy services
to SEBI and conducts awareness programmes among various stakeholders. He has conducted the
following programmes on behalf of SEBI.
Dr. Neeraj Kaushik has also been working with different industries to provide guidance on research
methodologies and research tools. At times such consultancy is also provided to acadamic
institutions for setting up there lab or any such activities.
7.1.2 Faculty as consultant of the Industries (15)
The faculty of the department are very active and provide consultancy to the corporate sector in
the area of marketing and taxation including finance. Two faculty members of the department
have been providing the consultancy in the following companies:
Department of Business Administration Page 331
Dr Neeraj Kaushik
Agoshdeep Education and Research Private Limited, 01 Vasundhara, Jiwaji Nagar,
Nagda-456335
Raintree Insurance Broking Private Limited, 720, Shivalik Satyamev, Near Vakil Saheb
Bridge, Bhopal-Ambli Cross Road, Bopal, Ahmedabad-380058
Dr Mohd Firoz
System Airconditioning Private Limited
G-44, Third Floor, Shaheen Bagh, Jamia Nagar, Okhla, New Delhi - 110025
Supreme Steel Packaging Private Limited
Plot No. 173, Phase - III, Pashamylaram, Hyderabad-502307, Telangana
System Aquatreat Private Limited
G-44, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, New Delhi - 110025
Ideas n Action Communication Services Private Limited
G-44, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, New Delhi - 110025
.
7.1.3 Initiatives related to industry interaction including industry internship/summer
training/study tours/guest lectures (15)
a) Industry trainings and visits.
Summer trainings and industrial visits are provided to the students once in every semester.
Internships of minimum 6-8 weeks are undertaken by the students.
b) Industry expert lectures
Experts and veterans from their respective fields are called for guest lectures. They enlighten
students about the current trends in market, show them the opportunities in their field and explains
career growth paths.
Department of Business Administration Page 332
Expert Lectures
Sr.no Title of the professional
Development program
Resource Person Date
2018
1 Personality Development
Workshop
Prof. Pooja Khatari, IP University,
Delhi
February 2-3, 2018
2 Expert Lecture Shri R.S. Mor, District Development
Manager, NABARD, Kurukshetra
February 6, 2018
3 Management Games
Workshop
Dr. Ajay Sharma, Associate
Professor, TITS, Bhiwani
March 15, 2018
4 Two Days Workshop on
Personality Development
Program
Ms. Madhu Sharma, CEO, Success
Strategies for life
August 20-21, 2018
5 Expert Lecture on
Motivation
Mr. Sandeep Singh, Social Scientist September 19, 2018
6 Expert Lecture on Banking
and Related Terms
Professor T.J. Kamalanabhan, IIT
Madras
October 25, 2018
7 Expert Lecture on
Entrepreneurship
Development
Mr. Karthik K.S, Founder and Chief
Executive Officer of AEON
October 31, 2018
2019
1 Expert Lectures on Career
opportunities in Foreign
Chinmoy Ghosh, Professor of
Finance, University of Connecticut
USA
January 4-7, 2019
2 Expert Lecture on
Behavioural Finance
Dr. Satish Kumar, Associate
Professor, MNIT, Jaipur
January 24, 2019
3 Expert Lectures on
Entrepreneur-ship
Development
Mr. Tirthankar Goyal CEO Galilee
Management Institute Israel
January 25, 2019
4 Management Games
Workshop
Dr. Ajay Sharma, Assistant Professor,
TITS, Bhiwani
April 12, 2019
Department of Business Administration Page 333
Sr.no Title of the professional
Development program
Resource Person Date
5 Guest Lecture
on Motivation and Self-
Management
Mr. Nikhil, HR Consultant at three
Six Five Focus
August 01, 2019
6 Guest Lecture on NSE Mr. G.C. Sharma, Advisor of
Educational wing of NSE
August 28, 2019
7 Guest Lecture on CRM Prof. Alok Rai, Faculty of
Management Studies, Banaras Hindu
University
September 9, 2019
2020
1 Expert Lecture on R-
Studio for Finance
Dr. Miklesh Yadav, Faculty Member,
Amity University, Noida
March 29, 2020
2 Expert Lecture on Quick
introduction to Python
Dr. Mihir Joshi, Assistant professor,
Faculty of Management Studies,
Gurukula Kangri Deemed University,
Haridwar 249404, Uttrakhand, India.
April 2, 2020
3 Expert Lecture on
Artificial Intelligence in
Marketing
Dr. Brijesh Shivathanu, Department
of Business Administration, Sri Balaji
University, Pune,Maharashtra, India
April 3, 2020
4 Expert Lecture on HRM:
The untold Story
Prof. Puja Khatri, Professor
GGSIPU, Delhi
April 4, 2020
5 Expert Lecture on
visualization using Tableau
Mr. Parth Kaushik, Data scientist,
Forkaia, Irvine, California, USA
April 9, 2020
6 Expert Lecture on basic
understanding of Legal
terms
Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Additional
Advocate General, Government of
Hayana
April 9, 2020
7 Expert Lecture on Digital
Marketing-Scope and
Career Opportunities
Dr. Arun Mittal, Faculty, Birla
Institute of Technology, Noida
April 20, 2020
8 Expert Lecture on Role of
HR in post COVID-19
Mr. Nikhil Mathur, General Manager
HR (Heading OD and Training)
Dalmia
April 23, 2020
Department of Business Administration Page 334
c) Lectures of Alumni who are working in industry
The institution conducts Alumni guest sessions at least once in one semester. Alumni students
come and talk about the recent changes in the economy, how to get placement ready, etc. to current
students. There is also a formal “Alumni Connect” programme where young alumni entrepreneurs
are invited to share their experiences.
d) Membership to professional societies
There are no memberships that the institute possess as a department with any professional body/
society. However, at faculty level, it has memberships with societies like:
ICA- Indian Commerce Association
AIMA- All India Management Association
IAA- Indian Accounting Association
ICAI- Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
AIU- Association of Indian University
IEA- Indian Economic Association
HEA- Haryana Economic Association
IPEA- Indian Political Economic Association
ISMA- International Stress Management Association
ADTEL- Association for Development of Teaching, Education and Learning
ISTD- Indian Society for Training & Development
AIIMS- Association of Indian Management Scholars
TAI-Textile Association India
e) Industry internship
It is compulsory according to the program curriculum to under-go summer internships or industrial
internships.
Various industries where students have undergone Training are:
Arya Metallurgical Pvt. Ltd. Dainik Jagran GTL Infrastructure Limited
Air India Delhi Metro Rail Co-operation Haryana leather chemical limited
AJ Hindi daily news paper Dimension group HDFC bank
Amul E-minds legal simplifying law Hero cycles
Axis bank Fab Hotels Holiday Inn
Bathla Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Eta general private limited HT Media Limited
Department of Business Administration Page 335
Bhushan Steel Limited Flamingio Consultant Private
Limited
IIFL limited
Bikaji foods international limited G R J trade and finance Indian Railway
Indigo Maruti weld private limited Parry Agro
Inspire consulting Mcube consultants Pricol Ltd.
ITI company Meduaxpedia technologies Punjab national bank
Jindal south west steel limited MUSASHI Ravi integrated logistics
Reliance Jio Nestkeys Infratech PVT Reliance Jio Info. Com. limited
JK Tyre Nets Terz Rishita Developers Private Limited
Kays Harbour Technologies NOVASYS Rockman Industries Limited
Lava international limited NTPC RSWM LIMITED
LG Paras Milk SBI Mutual Fund
Liberty Shoes Limited Maruti Weld Private Limited SHINHAN Bank
SHRI SANKALP HOSPITAL Task marketing solutions The times of India
Sietz TATA Autocomp Systems
Limited
Think & learn private limited
Spectranet Tata motors Ujjivan small finance bank
Sylantech Solutions Private Limited Tata power Ultra bytes
7.1.4 Participation of Industry Professionals in curriculum development, projects,
assignments as examiners in summer projects (10)
All the summer internship programs are carried out under the supervision of industrial
professionals. The professions act as mentors and help the students to know more about the
company, industry and market as whole. The institution does take a feedback from the industrial
professionals. It uses their feedback to improve the skill set of students. Their input is taken on the
curriculum as well.
7.1.5. Initiatives related to industry including executive education, industry sponsored Labs,
and industry sponsorship of student activities (15)
Department of Business Administration Page 336
Sponsorships are availed at institution level but not at departmental levels. There no sponsorships
for student activities.
7.1.6 Involvement of industry professional as members of various academic bodies/board
(10)
The following are the industrial professionals that are members of various academic bodies.
Board of Governors (Shri Jagdish Khattar, Chairman - BoG) Former IAS & Managing
Director of Maruti Udyog Limited
Prof. S.K Mehta, Vice Chancellor, Central University of Leh, Ladhakh
Prof. Rashmi Gaur, Professor, Department of HSS, IIT Roorkee
Prof. Sudhi Kumar, Professor (HAG), Department of Civil Engineering, MNIT Jaipur
Prof. Pawan Garga, Professor, H P University Business School, Shimla
Prof. Tanuj Nandan, Professor, School of Management Studies, NIT Allahabad (Prayagraj)
7.2. International Connect (40)
7.2.1. MoUs/Partnerships and its effective implementation (10)
There are no international connections on department level but at institution level there are a few
international connects that college is associated with. Following are the MoUs:
1. Executive Director C-DAC, Pune
2. Delta Power Solutions Indian Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon
3. Haryana Environment Society Yamunanager
4. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (UK)
5. Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University
7.2.2. Student Exchange Programs (10)
Our department is part of one of the premier institutions in the country. As such there is no
formal student exchange programme with any other NIT or other institutions. However, the
department recognizes the importance of student exchange programme and has initiated the
process of identifying institutions for establishing student exchange programmes.
7.2.3. Faculty Exchange Programs (10)
Department of Business Administration Page 337
Prof. Chinmoy Ghosh, a renowned faculty in the area of Finance (Real Estate) from
Connecticut University, USA visited the Department of Business Administration for a week and
interacted with the Faculty members, Ph.D. Scholars and the MBA Students of the department.
The institution does not have a formal faculty exchange programme, however, the
Department encourages the faculty to actively participate in workshops, guest lectures or any other
interactions with other universities and academic bodies. For example, Prof Rajender Kumar,
(HOD) of the Department, Dr. Neeraj Kaushik, Dr. Mohd. Firoz and Dr. Rachin Suri has delivered
lectures, talks and chaired the conference sessions in many institutions in India and Abroad.
Following is the list of lectures delivered by Dr. Neeraj Kaushik in other institution/departments.
Research Methodology Workshop Conducted
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Introduction to Research from June 19-20, 2021
Five weekend Online workshop on PLS-SEM-ANN in ITM Baroda from Feb 27-Mar 28,
2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Meta Analysis, Bibliometric Analysis and
Meta-SEM on Jan 23, 24 and 26, 2021
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on PLS-SEM using R-Studio from Jan 16-17, 2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Paper Writing, Model Robustness and
WarpPLS in KPB Hinduja College of Commerce Mumbai on Jan 08-10, 2021
Five-days faculty development Program on Multivariate Analysis in Fortune Institute of
International Business, New Delh from Jan 02-06, 2021
Three-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on Regression Analysis from Dec 25-27, 2020
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on EFA, CFA and CCA from Sept 26-27, 2020
Two-days FREE ONLINE Workshop on R-Studio from Sept 19-20, 2020
Two-days Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Institute of
Management Studies, Lucknow University, Lucknow from Feb 29-Mar 1, 2020
Two-days FREE Workshop on Text Analysis using R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute
of Advanced Studies, Delhi from Feb 1-2, 2020
Took Two-days Sessions in Seven days Workshop on Analytical Research techniques in
RA DAV College Mumbai from Dec 30-31, 2019
Department of Business Administration Page 338
Six-days Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Ramanujan
College, University of Delhi from Dec 23 - 28, 2019
Three-day Workshop on Research Methodology in KES College Mumbai on Oct 31-Nov
2, 2019
Took Two-days Sessions in One week Short Term Course on Research Methodology, in
UGC HRDC GNDU Amritsar from Sept 14-15, 2019
Three-day Workshop on Research Methodology in SGT university Gurugram on Aug 31,
Sept 7 and 28, 2019
Five-day Workshop on Multivariate Analysis Using R in PSIT College of Higher
Education, Kanpur from April 24 - 29, 2019
Took Two-days Sessions on Research Methodology in Seven days Workshop on Applied
Research Methodology in Social Sciences, in NIT Allahabad from June 17 to 23, 2019
Three-day FREE Workshop on R-Studio in DAV Centenary College, Faridabad, from
June 14 - 16, 2019
Took Two-days Sessions on Research Methodology in Six days Workshop on Research
Methods and Business Analytics Using SPSS & R-Studio, in DIAS Delhi from June 7
to 8, 2019
Five-day Workshop on Research Methodology and Statistical Tools in Ramanujan
College, University of Delhi from April 16 - 20, 2019
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in Himachal Pradesh university, Shimla from
Mar 22-24, 2019
Five-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute of Advanced Studies,
Delhi from Feb 18-22, 2019
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya,
Haridwar from Nov 23-25, 2018
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Motilal Nehru National Institute of
Technology (MNNIT) Allahabad from Oct 11-13, 2018
Three-day Workshop on R and R-Studio in the Faculty of Management Studies, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi from Oct 08-10, 2018
Three-day FREE Workshop on R and R-Studio in Rukmani Devi Institute of Advanced
Studies, Delhi from Sept 01-03, 2018
Department of Business Administration Page 339
Took 2-day sessions in Five-day Workshop Selection of Appropriate Research
Methods & Data Analytics Using R in New Delhi Institute of Management, Delhi from
July 17-18, 2018
7.2.4. Collaborative Research Projects (10)
Prof. Rajender Kumar is a leading authority in the area of Intellectual property Rights (IPR) and
has completed many sponsored research projects by MHRD in this area.
Institution encourages the faculties to participate in various research project within the institution
as well as outside the institution. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik is a pioneer in guiding collaborative research
project. He runs a google group where almost 2500 research scholar have taken membership and
he provided regular guidance to individual research scholars for research projects.
He has also created a YOUTUBE channel with name “Neeraj Kaushik” where he has uploaded
more than 800+ videos.
Owning YouTube Channel Neeraj Kaushik with 880+ videos, 16000+ subscribers and
approx. 2.0 million views
Owning Data Analysis Training Google Group for discussions pertaining to Research
and Statistical Applications with 2600+ members
It is about research and statistical software like IBM-SPSS, IBM-AMOS, R-STUDIO,
SmartPLS etc.
Also maintains a google group as DATA ANALYSIS TRANING with approx. 2500
research scholars, faculty members and experts of research-statistical domain.
This group is 10 years old.
Dr. Mohd. Firoz is also a Renowned Faculty Member (in the area of Environmental Accounting
and Carbon Finance) and Chartered Accountant who provides guidance in informal manner for
various financial related research project.
Department of Business Administration Page 340
CRITERIA 8: INFRASTRUCTURE (75)
8.1. Classrooms & Learning facilities (10)
National institute of technology is a premier institution with state-of-the-art infrastructure to
support quality teaching learning process. The institution has adequate number of class room
equipped with ICT facility. Wi-Fi is available for both the staff and the student in the campus
the computer laboratory is well equipped with required software and data analysis tools. In
addition, specific software is available to facilitate decision support system, Financial
accounting, forecasting, behavioural analysis etc.
Library is well equipped with books, journals, databases. Media centre is in place with adequate
e-content.
Being an autonomous institution, infrastructure is decided at the central level and it is in line
with MHRD norms. As per MHRD’s decision, a maximum of 35sq.ft. per student can be allotted
per student from this year onwards. The Institute has planned and constructed the infrastructure
which facilitates the curricular and co-curricular activities. The institution is centrally equipped
with the necessary infrastructure to meet the academic and co-curricular requirements. There
are adequate classrooms, seminar halls, tutorial rooms, laboratories and sufficient space for
hosting all academic activities.
Particulars Number
Classroom 04
Tutorial rooms 02
Seminar Hall 01
Auditorium (Jubilee Hall) 01
Computer Centre (Labs) 03
Library & Reading room 01
Department of Business Administration Page 341
Department Rooms Details: -
S.No. Room Details. Room No. Photos
1 HoD Office 201
2 Department
Office 71
202-1
3 Departmental
Library
202-2
4 Lecture Hall – 1
(Seating capacity-
72)
(Additional-16)
203
Department of Business Administration Page 342
5 Faculty Room &
DRDO Project
Lab
204
6 Conference Hall
(Seating capacity-
30)
205
7 Lecture Hall
(Seating capacity-
40)
(Additional-10)
206
Department of Business Administration Page 343
8 Faculty Room 207
9 Lecture Hall
(Seating capacity-
40)
(Additional-10)
208
10 Faculty Room 209
Department of Business Administration Page 344
11 Faculty Room 210
12 Lecture Hall
(Seating capacity-
72)
(Additional-16)
211
13 Tutorial Room
(Seating capacity-
10)
212
Department of Business Administration Page 345
14 Tutorial Room
(Seating capacity-
10)
213
15 Department Store 214
16 Faculty Room 217
Department of Business Administration Page 346
17 Computer Lab &
Finance Lab
(Seating capacity-
40& 15)
(Additional-10)
218
Department of Business Administration Page 347
8.2 Library (10)
The institution has a centralised fully equipped library. It houses a variety of books, journals and
e-resources. It is equipped with NPTEL and Shodhganga. The library is fully automated with
Capitaline software. The plagiarism software Turnitin is also in place. Recently, ProQuest
database has also been purchased. There are spacious and separate reading rooms for the students
and the faculties. CDs and DVDs on several topics on management like soft skills and training
are also available. The library is also equipped with high speed internet facility and photo copying
facility.
The library is accessible on all 7 days with 24 hours open. Unlimited reference books are allowed
for students which can be borrowed for 15 days. Every year, a budget of 3 crores is allocated to
purchase latest editions of books, journals and e-resources.
Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) – As per AICTE norms
√ Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
√Accessibility to students
a) Library resources for MBA program in central library
Library Holdings exclusive for
MBA
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Number Cost Number Cost Number Cost
Text Books and Reference Books 100 127132 93 62538 25 11232
Journals/ Periodicals 18 65389 18 67480 19 83205
E-Resources/ Database 1 59000 1 59000 - -
b) Central Library for all programs
Library Holdings
(Comprehensive)
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Number Cost Number Cost Number Cost
Text Books and
Reference Books
5352 6705761 1724 971912 59 49402
Journals/ Periodicals 58 422182 52 459989 45 480826
E-Resources 5381 22818860 5381 25730392 5200+ 26079202
Department of Business Administration Page 348
Provision of books with latest editions and
in adequate numbers
Every year, all the books recommended by the students
and faculty are procured by the library. The library is
procuring the latest edition of the book until specified
by the user.
Provision of journals, magazines and
newspapers including e- journals for latest
on the subject and for research
E-Resources
9
Journals
18
Magazines
16
Newspapers
18
Resource Sharing with sister University E-Resources
NDLI
Plagiarism
Software
Turnitin
Management
Journals &
Magazines
e-learning, e-library, webinars etc are also
used at institute rendering the role of a
facilitator for the teacher
E-Learning
NPTEL
Video
lectures
E-Library
IDR is being maintained
by the library.
New arrivals of books are
displayed in the college
website
NPTEL video courses are
available.
A dedicated computer lab
is available for accessing
e resources.
Question papers/Syllabus
are available on library
website.
Webinar
Preserving old project work for reference 1400 project report are available as on 14/12/2018
Accessibility to internet multimedia center A dedicated computer lab with internet connection is
available for accessing e resources.
CDs and DVDs on different subjects are
available including soft skills and many
topics in management
832
Science
Photocopying facility available An outsourced photocopy kiosk is installed in the
library premises
Spacious reading rooms are available for
reading
Yes
Books are procured on demand of
teachers/students
Indents are obtained from teachers/students and the
recommended books are being procured.
Library software is available for quick tracing
of books
KOHA 16.05
Automation in Library Integrated Library Management System
Average number of walk-ins 1346/day
Average number of books
issued/returned per day
456
Department of Business Administration Page 349
Ratio of library books to students
enrolled
1:32
Average number of books added during last
three years
Library – 6497,
MBA – 187
Library Timings:
Sr. No Details Library Timings
1 On working days 8.30 AM – 8.00 PM
2 On holiday 10.00 AM – 05.00 PM
3 Before examination days 8.30 AM – 8.00 PM
4 During examination days 8.30 AM – 8.00 PM
5 During vacation 8.30 AM – 8.00 PM
6 Reading hall Open 24 x 7
8.3. IT Infrastructure (15)
There is a Centre for Computer and Network at the institutional level. PCs and Desktops with latest
configurations are available. Anti-virus software is also in use. MS office and MS Windows are
installed in all systems. Laptops, laser jet printers, dot matrix printers, scanners are also available
in abundance. Internet facility and Wifi are available with a speed of 500 mbps. There are 75
desktops, 5 laptops, 7 LCD projectors and 7 audio visual systems for the MBA department. Server
is maintained centrally.
Sr. No. Description Total Quantity
1 Server Nil
2 Desktop 73
3 Laptop 5
4 Laser Jet Printers 8
5 Dot Matrix printers Nil
6 LCD Projectors 7
7 Scanners 1
8 OHP Nil
9 Colour Printer 2
10 Digital Podium 6
The list of number of computers, printers, desktops, projectors and other equipment
Department of Business Administration Page 350
List of Software’s available:
8.4. Learning Management System (10)
The institution has implemented a Learning Management System (LMS). The faculties upload
PowerPoint and e-content to the LMS which is available to the students through the mobile app.
The LMS has provisions for creating online class and e-content. The software also allows the
faculties to create assignments and the students may submit assignments to the same software.
The LMS support student- centric learning beyond the curriculum for every course an online forum
is available where the students may discuss various topic related to the curriculum. Faculties can
create and share session plans to the same platform. The model question section allows the faculties
to upload the model question for the particular course.
LMS has an integrated online MCQ platform. If faculties can create question bank with any
number of questions and create assessments with multiple question banks. There are provisions to
Sr. No. Description Total Quantity
1. MS Windows 73
2. IBM SPSSS v 24 Single user licence 1
3. Statistica 10 user licence 10
4. AMOS 3-user licence 01
5. MS OFFICE-2016 40
6. Systat-13 10 user licence 10
7. XLSTAT-Base Academic Licence 1
8. Single User Licence for Smart-PLS Professional 1
9. E-views (Software) 9 Enterprise Edition Academic 1
10. Tally NET Auditor Subscription 1
11. Software ( Ami Broker Ultimate Pack, Single user Licence) 1
12. NSE Smart 25
The Department actively promoted the use of Open Source
Softwares like R-Studio, Jamovi, GRTEL etc.
Department of Business Administration Page 351
enforce that each student automatically gets the random question paper. For MCQ questions results
are automatically calculated.
The LMS also has a module for mentoring. Each mentor can add the mentees and interact with the
mentees through the mobile app. The documentation for the interaction is automatically created.
A psychometric assessment is available for every student to ensure the mentors are providing right
kind of support to their mentees.
There is a module in the LMS that helps the faculties forecast future academic support require for
every student. The software usage advance technology such as machine learning and artificial
intelligence to analysis past data and academic and demographic parameters to predict academic
support require by the student in advance.
Online courses can be delivered through the software to the student each online course can be
associated with a quiz.
The usage record of the software by the student is automatically maintained. The faculties can
monitor how many students have downloaded the PPT or how many students have completed the
online courses.
LMS also facilitates tracking of student academic behaviour through various data analysis tools.
The faculties can monitor.
8.5. Hostel (10)
Our institution is a 100% residential campus for the students as well as staff. There are 11 boys
hostel and 4 girls hostel. Following are some of the facilities:
All the rooms are well furnished with table, chair, bed and cupboard.
The hostel is equipped with facilities like internet and library with reading room.
There are outdoor sports facilities with volleyball and badminton courts.
There is a common room allocated as well with indoor sports facilities.
Health care unit is also available along with ambulance on call.
UPS and power backup are available.
Water purifiers and water coolers are placed in all the floors.
CCTV is installed for safety and security.
Firefighting system has also been put in place.
There’s a mess for every hostel block with hygienic and healthy food.
Department of Business Administration Page 352
8.6. Sports Facility (10)
In order to instil team spirit and leadership qualities amongst the students, the institution
encourages and facilitates the students to participate in various sports activities. There’s a
dedicated department for physical education with qualified physical education teachers. They take
care of all the sports activities in the institute. The institution has a well-maintained playground as
well as a swimming pool. Multipurpose Gym with Treadmill is available in the institute. Students
are encouraged to play different sports like cricket, volleyball, football, kabbadi, basketball,
swimming and tennis. Students participate in various sports tournaments. Students have
participated in various other sports competitions and have performed well.
Years Name of the Activity Date Number
of events
2019-20 All India inter Nit at nit Trichy 2019 1
ITUSA, NIT Kurukshetra 2019 1
All India inter NIT Chess Tournament
at MNIT Jaipur
2019 1
All India Inter NIT Weightlifting
Tournament Jaipur
2019 1
2018-19 All India Inter NIT Weightlifting
Tournament Surathkal
2018 1
All India Inter NIT Yoga, VNIT Nagpur 29th September to 1st
October,2018
1
IGNIS’18 6th to 8th April, 2018 1
ITUSA Basketball, Football, Kabaddi,
Table-Tennis and Yoga Tournament
2018-19
5th to 7th October, 2018 5
8.6.1. Indoor Sports Facilities (5)
Chess
Yoga
Table Tennis
Badminton
Carrom
Indoor Gym
8.6.2. Outdoor Sports Facilities (10)
Football
Volleyball
Basketball
Department of Business Administration Page 353
Swimming
Cricket
Lawn Tennis
Badminton
Kho Kho
8.7. Medical Facility (10)
Free medical check-up and preliminary treatment facility is available for staff and students in
Campus. Annual health check-up is conducted for the staff above 40 years old. For students, there
is a medical insurance of Rs.1,00,000. A complete health care unit is available in the campus with
three full time doctors. X-ray, ECG and dentistry facilities are available in-house. A 10 bedded
unit has been set up in the campus for emergency. Eye check-up camps and Heart check-up camps
are organised.
List of facilities available at NIT HEALTH CENTRE:
OPD:
In OPD, clinical consultation is provided to patients and in required cases lab tests are advised.
The Institute has empanelled doctors of various specialities working in the city whose
CONSULTATION FEE is paid by the Institute only on referral slip issued by doctors of NIT
Health Centre.
Dental Facility:
An experienced Dental Surgeon provides procedures like Dental Extraction, RCT,
Scaling/Cleaning, Fillings etc.
Laboratory Services:
Routine investigations are carried out at the Institute Health Centre. One pathological Lab is
empanelled to carry out specialised tests.Microbiology tests are referred outside.
Pharmacy:
Routine medicines are available for faculty, non-faculty staff members, their dependents and
students. Medicines are dispensed on the prescription of SMO/MO, Health Centre.
Department of Business Administration Page 354
Radiology/X-Ray facility:
Digital X-Ray’s are done on the prescription of SMO/MO, Health Centre during OPD hours.
(9:00am to 1:00pm) and (3:00pm to 5:30pm).
ECG Services:
Computerized ECG services are available at the Health Centre during OPD hours.(9:00am to
1:00pm) and (3:00pm to 5:30pm).
Casualty/Triage:
A well-equipped casualty with 08 beds (04 bed in Female ward & 04 bed in Male ward) is available
for emergency cases.Treatment of various diseases such as typhoid, acute gastroenteritis, COPD,
bronchial asthma malaria, dysmenorrhea, acute colic etc. are given.
Observation and management is done according to seriousness of cases as decided by the treating
doctors as per facilities available. Serious cases are referred to higher centre/empanelled
hospital/Govt. hospital after giving preliminary treatment.
Timing: 9:00am to 1:00pm & 3:00pm to 8:30pm (5:30pm to 8:30pm: emergency services)
No investigation facility is available in emergency time period (5:30pm to 8:30pm).
Ambulance Services:
The Health Centre has round the clock support of the well-equipped Ambulance vehicle for the
transport of patients from Institute Health Centre to local Govt. Hospital/empanelled
Hospital/Govt. Medical Institute for specialized management under the following conditions:
The ambulance services are provided free of cost to such students, staff and their
dependants whenever they are referred for treatment to the Government/ Empanelled
Hospitals by SMO/MO of Institute Health Centre. The ambulance is allowed in the
emergent cases only. Further, the ambulance is not allowed for the follow up.
The ambulance services are provided free of cost for the delivery purpose of the female
employees and wives of the employees of the Institute for Government/Empanelled
Hospitals.
The ambulance services is provided free of cost for carrying dead body from Hospital to
the Campus of the Institute.
In the absence of SMO/MO the requisition of ambulance will be allowed by Prof. I/c
(Health Centre)
Ambulance: Tel: +91-9467844800
Department of Business Administration Page 355
OPD Timings
Summer Timings
(From 16th April to 15th October)
Winter Timings
(From 16th October to 15th April)
Monday to Friday.
Morning : 8:30 am to 12:30 pm
Evening : 3:00 pm to 8:30 pm
Saturday
Morning : 8:30 am to 12:30 pm
Sunday
Morning : 8:30 am to 12:30 pm Gazetted
Holiday : 9:00 am to 03:00 pm
Monday to Friday.
Morning : 9:00 am to 1:00 pm
Evening : 3:00 pm to 8:30 pm
Saturday
Morning : 9:00 am to 1:00 pm
Sunday
Morning : 9:00 am to 1:00 pm
Gazetted Holiday : 9:00 am to 03:00
pm
Medical Insurance :
Presently staff members who have opted for medical insurance have a cover of Rs. 5 lac per year
for critical illness. Similarly, students have medical insurance cover of Rs. 1 lac per year till date.
Medical Information
Immunization is provided by District Hospital Staff as per WHO immunization schedule on every
1st Thursday of the month in NIT Health Centre.
Timing : 10:00 am to 02:00pm
Pulse Polio Programme:
Pulse Polio Programme is conducted at Institute Health Centre by the State Government from time
to time.
List of Empanelled Private Hospitals
Sr.
No. Name of the Doctor Field of Specialization
1 Aggarwal Nursing Home Multispecialty
2 Cygnus Hospital Multispecialty
3 Apna Hospital, Multispecialty
4 Saraswati Mission Hospital Multispecialty
5 RadhaKrishan Children Hospital Multispecialty
6 Shri BalajiAarogyam Hospital Multispecialty
Department of Business Administration Page 356
Sr.
No. Name of the Doctor Field of Specialization
7 Anand Orthopaedic Centre Orthopedic
8 J.P. Bharal Hospital Orthopedic
9 Gandhi Nursing Home Orthopedic+Detal
10 SinghalBhawan (Hospital) Physician
11 Sethi Nursing Home Physician
12 Kurukshetra Nursing Home Physician, Cardiology
13 B.S. Heart Care Hospital Cardiology
14 Kedar Children Hospital. Child Specialist
15 Pawan Surgical Hospital Surgeon
16 Surender Mehta Surgical and
Maternity Hospital Surgeon
17 Dua Dental Clinic, Dentist
18 Aggarwal Dental Clinic Dentist
19 Healthy Mouth Dental Clinic Dentist
20 Virk Nursing Home ENT
21 Lalit ENT Hospital ENT
22 Bansal Eye Clinic Eye
23 Saini Eye Care Centre Eye
24 Ankur Nursing Home Eye/O & G
25 Ashirwad Nursing Home Ortho + O & G
26 Atul Clinic Gynecologist
27 Sobti Nursing Home Eye & Dental
28 Chandigarh Children Hospital Pediatrician
29 Bhardwaj Hospital Pediatrician
30 Life Line Physiotherapy Clinic Physiotherapist
31 Health Care Physiotherapy Clinic Physiotherapist
32 Mittal Path Lab Pathologist
33 Bansal Skin Care Clinic Skin
34 Dermawave Skin Lazer Skin
35 Neuropsychiatry Clinic Psychiatry
36 Jhamb Chest and Dental Clinic Chest, Asthma, Allergy & T.B. Specialist, Dental
37 Jiva Skin Clinic Skin
38 Udyot Advance Dental Care Dentist
39 Harsh Hospital Child Specialist
Department of Business Administration Page 357
CRITERIA 9: ALUMNI PERFORMANCE AND CONNECT (50)
9.1. Alumni Association (10)
Alumni association is formed and registered. This alumni association was formed around mid
seventies. The alumni meet is arranged 4 to 5 times in one year. Institute celebrates silver jubilee,
golden jubilee, diamond jubilee, platinum jubilee and the alumni put forward active participation
in the same.
More than ten thousand members are part of Alumni Association. The link for the same is
https://www.nitkkraa.org/members.dz
9.2 Involvement of Alumni (25)
The institute invites its alumni for motivating and guiding students for higher studies, for guest
lectures, seminars. They also act as judge for various events. The alumni groom the students by
giving the feedback about expectation of industries from fresher. The self-employed alumni
conduct workshops and value addition programs for students. Alumni also give guest lectures;
they give feedback on curriculum if required and also provide with industrial guidance as and
when required. There is a Linkedin profile for our department where the students can interact with
the alumni and seek their assistance.
9.3. Methodology to connect with Alumni and its implementation (15)
Alumni are invited for many functions in the college as honorary guests or chief guests. Alumni
visit to institute for events like annual social gathering. The Alumni are generally invited to all the
social activities. Alumni portal for the college is available. The link for the same is
https://www.nitkkraa.org/. For MBA department, students can connect with the alumni through a
Linkedin page. At the institutional level, alumni meet takes places 4-5 times a year.
Department of Business Administration Page 358
CRITERION 10: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)
1. Apply knowledge of management theories and practices to solve business problems.
2. Foster Analytical and critical thinking abilities for data-based decision making.
3. Ability to develop Value based Leadership ability.
4. Ability to understand, analyse and communicate global, economic, legal, and ethical aspects
of business.
5. Ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational goals, contributing
effectively to a team environment.
The institution has a mechanism of calculating the attainment level of every programme
outcome and course outcome through direct and indirect assessment methodologies
accordingly we have identified the improvement areas for every programme outcome. The
institution ensures that appropriate actions are taken for every identified weakness area.
10.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs (20)
Identify the areas of weaknesses in the program based on the analysis of evaluation of POs
attainment levels. Measures identified and implemented to improve POs attainment levels for
the assessment years including curriculum intervention, pedagogical initiatives, support system
improvements, etc.
The Department of Business Administration is striving very hard on regular basis for upgrading
and improving the overall quality of academics. To achieve this target, assessment for each
course is carried out while focusing upon the entire COs and POs and it is as represented in the
tables given below. Target and PO attainment levels have been taken from criteria 2.
Batch 2017-19
POs Target level Attainment level Observations
PO1: Apply knowledge of management theories and practices to solve business
problems
PO1 60% 67.73% Attainment level is more than
target value
Action: The attainment level is more than the target value therefore, no action is required.
However, as a regular process for improvement, feedback received from alumni, employer
and students. On the basis of feedback emphasis have been given to strengthen the
fundamental concepts of the courses so that the students may be able to understand and solve
the business problems of the organization/company.
PO2 : Foster Analytical and critical thinking abilities for data-based decision making
PO2 60% 62.71% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Department of Business Administration Page 359
Action: The Attainment level is more than the target value therefore no action is required.
However, as a regular process for enhancement, in the analytical and critical thinking for
data-based decision making more emphasis have been given on methodological part so that
the students may able to take business decisions more confidently.
PO3: Ability to develop Value based Leadership ability
PO3 60% 56.88% Attainment level is slightly less
than the target value
Action: Indeed the attainment level value in case of ability to develop value based leadership
ability is slightly less than the target value. The Department took it very seriously and subject
wise analyses was made to improve the target value by caring out more activities (games and
role paly session) to enhance value-based leadership among the students.
PO4 : Ability to understand, analyze and communicate global, economic, legal, and
ethical aspects of business
PO4 60% 62.14% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The Attainment level is more than the target value therefore no action is required.
However, as a regular process for improvement, more emphasis was given to include more
case studies so that the students may be able to understand analyze and communicate global,
economic, legal, and ethical aspects of business.
PO5 Ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational goals,
contributing effectively to a team environment
PO5 60% 59.68% Attainment level is marginally
less than the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of Ability to lead themselves and others in the
achievement of organizational goals, contributing effectively to a team environment ability
is marginally less than the target value. The issue was analysed and decided to improve the
target value of ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational
goals, contributing effectively to a team environment by organizing more expert lectures
from industry.
Department of Business Administration Page 360
Batch 2018-20
POs Target level Attainment level Observations
PO1: Apply knowledge of management theories and practices to solve business
problems
PO1 60% 62.02% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of apply knowledge of management theories and
practices to solve business problems ability is more than the target value therefore no action
is required. However, as a regular process the Department analyze the reasons and decided
to improve the target value by more interaction with faculty members through online as due
to COVID-19 classes were engaged through online.
PO 2 : Foster Analytical and critical thinking abilities for data-based decision making
PO2 60% 59.37% Attainment level is slightly less
than the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of analytical and critical thinking abilities for
databased decision-making ability is slightly less than the target value. The Department
analyze the reasons and found that the target value could not achieve due to online classes.
As the students used the online system first time. In order to achieve the target the faculty
members will try at their level to make the sessions more interactive.
PO3: Ability to develop Value based Leadership ability
PO3 60% 56.09% Attainment level is slightly less
than the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of ability to develop value based leadership
ability is slightly less than the target value. The Department took it very seriously and subject
wise analyses was made and decided to improve the target value by carrying out more
activities (games and role paly session) to enhance value-based leadership among the
students.
PO4 : Ability to understand, analyze and communicate global, economic, legal, and
ethical aspects of business
PO4 60% 61.66% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The Attainment level is more than the target value therefore no action is required.
However, as a regular process for improvement, more emphasis was given to include more
case studies so that the students may be able to understand analyze and communicate global,
economic, legal, and ethical aspects of business.
PO5 Ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational goals,
contributing effectively to a team environment
PO5 60% 57.68% Attainment level is slightly less
than the target value
Department of Business Administration Page 361
Action: The attainment level value in case of Ability to lead themselves and others in the
achievement of organizational goals, contributing effectively to a team environment ability
is slightly less than the target value. The issue was analysed and decided to improve the
target value of ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational
goals, contributing effectively to a team environment by organizing more expert lectures
from academia as well as industry.
Batch 2019-21
POs Target level Attainment level Observations
PO1: Apply knowledge of management theories and practices to solve business
problems
PO1 60% 68.07% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of apply knowledge of management theories and
practices to solve business problems ability more than the target value therefore no action is
required. However, as a regular process the Department got feedback from alumni and
employer to improve the target value by more interaction between faculty and students
through online as due to COVID-19 classes were engaged through online.
PO 2 : Foster Analytical and critical thinking abilities for data-based decision making
PO2 60% 63.48% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of analytical and critical thinking abilities for
databased decision-making ability is more than the target value. No action is required
however, for the further improvement the department got feedback from employer and
alumni on telephonically. In order to improve, the performance of the students the faculty
members through case studies will try to make the sessions more interactive.
PO3: Ability to develop Value based Leadership ability
PO 3 60% 58.60% Attainment level is less than the
target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of ability to develop value based leadership
ability is less than the target value. The issue was analyzed and decided to improve the target
value of ability to develop value based leadership ability, contributing effectively to a team
environment by organizing more expert lectures from industry and academia.
PO4 : Ability to understand, analyze and communicate global, economic, legal, and
ethical aspects of business
PO4 60% 63.32% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The Attainment level is more than the target value therefore no action is required.
Department of Business Administration Page 362
However, as a regular process for improvement, more emphasis was given to include more
case studies so that the students may be able to understand analyze and communicate global,
economic, legal, and ethical aspects of business.
PO5 Ability to lead themselves and others in the achievement of organizational goals,
contributing effectively to a team environment
PO5 60% 61.43% Attainment level is more than
the target value
Action: The attainment level value in case of Ability to lead themselves and others in the
achievement of organizational goals, contributing effectively to a team environment ability
is more than the target value. However, no action is required, as a regular process, the issue
was analysed and decided to improve the target value of ability to lead themselves and others
in the achievement of organizational goals, contributing effectively to a team environment
by organizing more expert lectures from industry.
10.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
Academic audit is conducted by a team of competent academician from IIT’s. the team visit
the institution and reviews the academic and administrative processes in details.
There is also a process of external peer review for various academic and administrative
processes every year. A team of competent professors from other departments conducts the
audit and submits the report to Senate. The improvement areas are discussed with the HOD
and subsequently action plans are formulated.
The institution has also conducted external academic audit in the current academic year.
Action taken based on academic audit recommendation.
100 percent ICT based teaching and learning methodology has been implemented.
Faculties are encouraged to adopt student centric methodologies such as group
discussion case study etc.
Students are encouraged to participate in live project and group project.
Students are encouraged for research publication and subsequently few students have
published research papers.
Students are encouraged to use various data analyses tools and techniques.
Orientation is given to the faculties to the students for the research methodologies. Dr.
Neeraj Kaushik the head of the department maintains a YOUTUBE channel with over
Department of Business Administration Page 363
550 videos on research techniques and data analyses tool students are actively
encouraged to go through the videos and use the tools for their research projects.
10.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (10)
Placement
Being a premier institution in India the MBA department has always observed over 60
percent placement of the student, including students opting for higher education and
entrepreneurship. The students who are not placed through the campus are also employed
within few months of completing the course.
The department has an active placement cell comprising of final year students and faculties.
The placement cell works towards conducting on campus placements as well as co-
ordinates for off campus placement activities. The last outgoing batch has over 60 percent
of the students placed with good package.
The institution organises multiple programmes towards improvement of employability of
the students. Soft skill courses are organised as part of the curriculum. Project work and
dissertations are also made part of the curriculum.
Higher studies
The faculties encourage students to take up higher studies based on the interest of the students.
Students are sensitized about different opportunities for higher education and informal
guidance is also provided to the interested students.
Entrepreneurship
The institution has an incubation centre which supports students with space, infrastructure,
financial legal and HR requirements. Students can work from the incubation centre and can
take guidance from the mentors of the same departments or the different departments.
The department also invites eminent speakers from the industries to talk about various
aspects of entrepreneurship. Workshops and pep-talks by experts from different sectors are
also regularly organised.
There is a formal “Alumni Connect” programme where young alumni entrepreneurs are
invited to share their experiences.
Department of Business Administration Page 364
Improvement through course delivery.
The faculties monitor attainment of programme outcome and course outcome and
accordingly attempt is made to introduce new topics of industry relevance. In many courses
practical work and exercises are introduced for the students to get real life exPOs ures. The
students are sensitised about different Software used in the industries for data analyses,
interpretation and decision making. For example, students are trained on SPSS, R-
STUDIO, ADVANCE EXCEL etc. The department has set up an open source computer
lab with a number of open source software.
10.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program (10)
It has been a continuous endeavour of the department to improve the quality of the students
being admitted to the institution. The management has also used different modes of
entrance examination to ensure quality students getting admitted. For example: entrance to
MBA programme has been through National and International level entrance examinations
such as CAT, GMAT etc. The cut Of marks has also been increased over time to ensure
quality students getting admitted to the institutions.
The focus of the curriculum has always been improving employability of the students and
achieving competencies aligned to PO’S and PEO’S.
A continuous monitoring mechanism is also in place to ensure the attainment of the
competencies as per the PO’S and CO’S. as a result of which the institution has been able
to achieve superior academic performance of the students and higher employability. This
resulted in attracting quality students for subsequent batches.
The institution regularly provides opportunities to the students for participation in various
live projects in the industry. The institution also takes feedback from the industry for the
students working in live projects. It is observed that the feedback from the industry is
improved over time.
There is a stringent selection process where multiple parameters such as academic
background, extra-curricular and co-curricular activities, prior working experience and soft
skills of the students are assessed and then the final admission list is prepared.
The department follows the admission process without any discrimination. Transparency
maintained for every stage of the selection process. The details are maintained in the
website.
Declaration
The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given below:
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBA's accreditation
manual concerned for this application, rules, regulations, notifications and NBA expert visit
guidelines in force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them.
It is submitted that information provided in this Self-Assessment Report is factually correct. I
understand and agree that an appropriate disciplinary action against the Institute will be
initiated by the NBA in case any false statement/information is observed during pre-visit, visit,
POs t visit and subsequent to grant of accreditation.
t
'lDate: 20/tz-/ z 1
place: l/"u-n J.+l"i%
Deprtment of Business Administration Page 365
Department of Business Administration Page 366
List of Annexure
· Annexure – I: Details of the Faculty Information.
· Annexure – II: Scheme and Syllabus
· Annexure – III: Alumni Association Registration Certificate
***
Department of Business Administration Page 367
ANNEXURE-6 FACULTY DETAILS
S.
No
.
Na
me
PA
N N
o.
Qu
ali
fica
tio
n
Area o
f S
peci
ali
za
tio
n
Desi
gn
ati
on
Da
te o
f J
oin
ing
Da
te o
n w
hic
h D
esi
gn
ate
d a
s
Pro
fess
or/
Ass
ocia
te
Pro
fess
or
Cu
rren
tly
Ass
oci
ate
d
(Y/N
)
Na
ture o
f A
sso
cia
tio
n
(Reg
ula
r/C
on
tra
ct/
Ad
jun
ct)
If c
on
tra
ctu
al
men
tio
n F
ull
tim
e o
r P
art
tim
e
Da
te o
f L
eavin
g
(In
case
Curr
entl
y
Ass
ocia
ted i
s
“N
o”)
2018-2019
1. Dr. Rajender Kumar
AIWPK4680Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource &
General Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik
AJKPK7572J
Ph.D MarketingManagement
Associated Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Regular Full -
3. Dr.
Mohammad Firoz
ALFPM8030L
Ph.D Finance Assistant Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Regular Full -
4. Dr. Manish Kumar Jha
AGNPJ7508D
Ph.D Finance Assistant Professor
16-12-2013 16-12-2013 No Regular Full 05-08-2018 (Lien)
5. Dr. Kranti Walia
AAWPW3663K
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
02-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full 08-02-2019
6. Mr. Rachin Suri
CKBPS6733H
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
7. Ms. Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK8652K
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
8. Dr. Neelam Kaushal
AHOPN2624C
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
9. Dr. Meenu Saini
CHGPS0529H
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
2019-20
1. Dr. Rajender Kumar
AIWPK4680Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource & General
Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik
AJKPK7572J
Ph.D Marketing Management
Associated Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Regular Full -
3. Dr. Mohammad
Firoz
ALFPM8030L
Ph.D Finance Assistant Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Regular Full -
4. Dr. Manish Kumar Jha
Ph.D Finance Assistant Professor
16-12-2013 16-12-2013 No Regular Full 05-08-2018 (Lien)
5. Mr. Rachin Suri
CKBPS6733H
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
6. Ms. Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK8652K
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
7. Dr. Neelam Kaushal
AHOPN2624C
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
Department of Business Administration Page 368
S.
No
.
Na
me
PA
N N
o.
Qu
ali
fica
tio
n
Area o
f S
peci
ali
za
tio
n
Desi
gn
ati
on
Da
te o
f J
oin
ing
Da
te o
n w
hic
h D
esi
gn
ate
d a
s
Pro
fess
or/
Ass
ocia
te
Pro
fess
or
Cu
rren
tly
Ass
oci
ate
d
(Y/N
)
Na
ture o
f A
sso
cia
tio
n
(Reg
ula
r/C
on
tra
ct/
Ad
jun
ct)
If c
on
tra
ctu
al
men
tio
n F
ull
tim
e o
r P
art
tim
e
Da
te o
f L
eavin
g
(In
case
Curr
entl
y
Ass
ocia
ted i
s
“N
o”)
8. Dr. Meenu Saini
CHGPS0529H
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
9. Prof Vikas Chaudhary
Ph.D General Management
Professor 01-08-2019 1-11-2017 Regular Full
10. Dr. Geeta Sachdeva
Ph.D Human
Resource Management
Assistant Professor
01-08-2019 1-11-2017 Regular Full
11. Dr. Shabnam Ph.D Psychology Assistant Professor
01-08-2019 1-11-2017 Regular Full
2020-21
1. Dr. Rajender Kumar
AIWPK4680Q
Ph.D Economics,
Human
Resource & General
Management
Professor 1-11-2017 1-11-2017 Regular Full -
2. Dr. Neeraj Kaushik
AJKPK7572J
Ph.D Marketing Management
Associated Professor
03-09-2013 03-09-2013 Regular Full -
3. Dr. Mohammad
Firoz
ALFPM8030L
Ph.D Finance Assistant Professor
12-12-2013 12-12-2013 Regular Full -
4. Mr. Rachin Suri
CKBPS6733H
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 Yes Contractual Full -
5. Ms. Gagnapreet
Kaur
AZUPK8652K
MBA Marketing Assistant Professor
1-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
6. Dr. Neelam Kaushal
AHOPN2624C
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
7. Dr. Meenu Saini
CHGPS0529H
Ph.D Human Resource
Assistant Professor
2-08-2016 - Yes Contractual Full -
Department of Business Administration Page 369
Scheme of the Curriculum
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA –
101
Principles& Practices of
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
103
Organization Behavior 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
105
Managerial Economics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
107
Accounting for Managers 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
109
Business Environment 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
111
Soft Skills Development 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
113
Business Statistics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA –
115
Computer Application in
Management
2 0 2 4 3.0
MBA -
102
Financial Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
104
Human Resource
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
106
Production & Operation
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
108
Marketing Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
110
Total Quality Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
112
Business Ethics 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
114
Research Methodology 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
116
Management Information
System
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
201
International Business 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
203
Business Law & Corporate
Taxation
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
205
Entrepreneurship
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
211
Labour Laws 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
221
Organizational Change and
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
Department of Business Administration Page 370
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA-
231
Management Training and
Development
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
241
Counselling Skills for
Managers
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
251
Performance Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
213
Financial Institution &
Markets
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
223
Merchant Banking &
Financial Services
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
233
Security Analysis & Portfolio
Management.
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
243
Insurance and Risk
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
253
Project Finance 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
215
Integrated Marketing
Communication
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
225
Sales & Distribution
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
235
Product & Brand
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
245
Consumer Behaviour 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
255
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
207
Summer Training Report 4.0
MBA -
202
Strategic Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA -
204
Digital Marketing and E-
Commerce
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
206
Dissertation Project 6.0
MBA -
212
Human Resource
Development: Strategies and
Systems
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
222
Dynamics of Industrial
Relations
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
232
Interpersonal & Group
Dynamics
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
242
Compensation Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
Department of Business Administration Page 371
Course
Code
Course Title Total Number of contact hours Credits
Lecture
(L)
Tutorial
(T)
Practical
# (P)
Total
Hours
Credits
MBA-
252
Cross Cultural Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
214
International Financial
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
224
Working Capital
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
234
Derivatives Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
244
Microfinance 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
254
Commercial Bank
Management
3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
216
Retail Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
226
Relationship Marketing 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
236
Marketing of Services 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
246
Supply Chain Management 3 1 0 4 3.5
MBA-
256
Emerging Concepts in
Marketing
3 1 0 4 3.5
Total 200 188
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
CURRICULUM
(w.e.f. Session 2019-2020)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
KURUKSHETRA-136119
Vision of Department
To be a role model in management education and research responsive to global
challenges.
Mission of Department
M1: To impart quality management education.
M2: To develop innovative professionals, entrepreneurs and researchers.
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the growth of industry, society and
futuristic knowledge focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEOs Statements
PEO1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
PEO2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution to accomplish the dynamic
socio-economic needs.
PEO3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of industry and society.
PEO4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MANAGEMENT (MBA 101)
Total: 100 L–T Theory: 50 3- 1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The course will appraise and see the sights for basics of management and a variety of proportions of management. It will assist to categorize the key competencies needed to be an efficient manager. It will also analyze communication situations and extend useful communication strategies and communicate influentially. It will make available the students with the potential to apply theoretical knowledge in simulated and real-life settings. It will also facilitate the students widen ability to work in teams. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction: Introduction to Concept of Goals, Resources, Efficiency & Effectiveness; Introduction to Management discipline as an Art, a Science, a Profession; Henry Mintzberg’s Roles of a Manager: Skills of a manager. Evolution of Management Thoughts/Approaches: Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor, Gantt, Glibreths); Classical Organization Theory (Henry Fayol, C.I. Barnard, M.P. Follet, Max Weber); Neo-Classical Theory (Human Relations Movement & Hawthorne Experiments, Behavioural Theory, Social Systems Theory- Niklas Luhmann) Systems Approach; Contingency Approach ; Recent contributions. Unit-II Functions of Management: Operative functions – Production, Marketing, Finance, Personnel; Managerial functions –Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, and Controlling. Planning: Concepts, Objectives and Steps in Planning, Types of Plans, Long Range Planning, Determinants of Effective Planning. Unit-III Decision Making: Steps of Decision Making, Nature, Types, Models/Approaches Conditions of Risk, Certainty, Uncertainty; Barriers to effective decision making. Organizing: Nature and Significance, Approaches to organizing, Line and Staff Relationship, Delegation and Decentralization, Division of Work, Span of Management, Authority Responsibility and Accountability; Formal and Informal Organisations;
Unit-IV Staffing: Nature and Significance, Recruitment and Selection, Performance Appraisal and Development; Directing: Nature and Significance, Issues in directing human resource, Motivation, Leadership, Communication; Unit-V Controlling: Definition and Elements, Control Techniques, Determinants of an Effective Control System. Issues of Relevance in Management Practices: Globalization, Workforce Diversity, E-business, Knowledge Management, Workplace Spirituality, Managerial Ethics, Human values in Management, Self-Management, Lessons from Ancient Indian traditions, Japanese Management, Search of Excellence. Modern Concepts in Management. Course Outcome: Upon successful completion of this course, the student will reliably be able to demonstrate the ability to extend the thoughtful about basic management concepts and principles. They will also get the information relevant to management theories in realistic business set-up. Moreover it will also widen their practical skills of judgment making and leadership in situation to present business set-up. Students will also learn essential business presentation skills and increase their communication skills. References: (Text Books)
1. Stoner, Freeman and Gilbert, Jr. (2008). Management. 6th Edition. Prentice Hall of India. 2. Harold, K. and Heinz, W. (2008). Essentials of Management. 5th Edition. Tata McGraw
Hill. 3. Koontz, Harold, and Heinz Weihrich (2012). Essentials of Management: An International
and Leadership Perspective. 9th Edition. New Delhi. Tata Mc Graw-Hill. (Reference Books)
4. Robbins and Coulter. (2007). Management. 9th Edition. Prentice Hall of India. 5. Robbins, S. P., and Decenzo, D. A. (2007). Fundamentals of Management: Essential
Concepts and Applications.6th Edition. Pearson Education. 6. Weihrich Heinz and Koontz Harold. (2008). Management: A Global and Entrepreneurial
Perspective. 12 Edition. McGraw Hill. 7. Gulati, Mayo, Nohria. (2014). Management. Cengage India. 8. Anil Bhat, (2008) Arya Kumar . Management. Oxford Publications. 9. Dubrin. (2011). Management. Cengage Publications. 10. Jones and George. (2012). Contemporary Management. McGraw Hill. 11. Richard L. Draft. (2012). The New Era of Management. Cengage India. 12. Mullins. (2011) Management and OB, 8th Edition. Pearson Education. 13. Chandan, J.S. (2005). Management Concepts and Strategies. Vikas Publishing House.
ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR (MBA 103)
Total: 100 L–T Theory: 50 3- 1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: This core course aids students to understand, predict and influence individual and group behaviour. The course is designed to give special attention to the major challenges and the paradigm shift faced by individuals and groups in today's organizations. It covers individual understanding of personality, perception, learning, attitudes and values and their influence in organizational context. It will make students aware of one’s own behaviour and understand others’ behavior.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks Unit-I Understanding Organization, Behaviour & OB- Organization as a Social Unit, Concept of Learning Organization, Field of OB: Individual, Groups & Systems as building blocks, contributing disciplines, Challenges & Opportunities of OB. Historical background of OB: the Hawthorne Studies and the Ahmadabad experiment.
Unit-II
Individual behaviour- Foundations of individual behaviour, Personality: Meaning, “Big –Five” Personality Traits, MBTI. Perception: Meaning, Role of Object, Environment and Observer; Judging Others. Learning: Meaning, Theories: Classical Conditioning, Operant Conditioning & Social Learning; Methods to shape Behaviour (reinforcement, punishment, & extinction), OB Mod.
Unit-III
Individual Behaviour in Organization- Attitudes: Components, functions, changing attitudes, work attitudes (Job satisfaction, Organizational Commitment &Employee Engagement) Motivation: Concept, Content Theories (Maslow, Herzberg, McClelland, McGregor); Process Theories (Vroom’s Model); Contemporary Theories: (Equity Theory, Attribution Theory). Creativity: Nature, process and its facilitation on organization.
Unit-IV
Groups in Organization-Groups-Types, their development stages, concept of role, status, norms size and cohesiveness. Group decision making techniques, Group Think & Group Shift; Transactional Analysis; Four Life positions. Influence, Power & Politics: Concept of influence, bases of power, Political Behaviour: Concept &contributing factors.
Unit-V
Stress & Conflict- meaning& causes of stress, types of conflicts (intra individual & interactive), coping strategies for stress & conflict; negotiation skills. Communication: Process, types, barriers; Grapevine. Leadership – Concept, Trait, Behavioral and Contingency (Fiedler, Hersey & Blanchard) theories; leadership styles, successful & effective leadership. Organizational Change: concept, resistance to and managing change.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of the course, students will be able to have a basic knowledge of individual and group behaviour as a distinct field in management with an emphasis on practical application. Enhancement in the students’ understanding of one’s own behaviour and its impact on others will enhance the personal & interpersonal skills of the students. Finally, they will have a meaningful insight to diagnose and effectively deal with human behaviour at the workplace.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Robbins, Judge and Vohra. (2017). Organizational Behaviour. 16th edition. Pearson Education India.
2. Luthans. (2013). Organisational Behavior. 12th edition. Mc Graw Hill education. 3. Pareek, Udai. (2012). Understanding Organisational Behaviour. Oxford University Press.
(Reference Books)
4. Baron and Greenberg. (2011). Behaviour in Organisations. 10th edition. PHI. 5. Kinicki and Krietner. (2011). Organizational Behaviour. Tata McGraw Hill Publications. 6. Newstrom. (2011). Organizational Behavior at Work. Tata McGraw Hill Publications. 7. Kandelwal and Nelson. (2013). Organisational Behaviour. 7th edition. Cengage India 8. Gregory Moorhead, G .Ricky W .iffin (2012). Managing Organisational Behaviour.
Cengage India. 9. Jones and Mathew. (2011). Organisation Designs. Theory and Change. 7th edition. Pearson
Education. 10. Keith, Davis. and John, Newstrom. (2010). Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at
Work. Tata McGraw Hill. 11. Kalliath, Brough and Manimala. (2009). Organisational Behaviour. Tata McGraw Hill. 12. Rao. V. S. P. (2010). Organisational Behaviour. Himalaya Publishing House.
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS (MBA 105)
Total: 100 L–T Theory: 50 3- 1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The purpose of this course is to provide students with a foundation of economic concepts and tools that have direct managerial applications. The course will sharpen analytical skills of students through integrating knowledge of economic theory with decision-making techniques. The course will help the students to adept at designing and developing business strategy at firm level. Students will gain a rigorous understanding of competitive markets as well alternative market structures. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these, one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction to Managerial Economics: - nature, scopeand significance. The circular flow of economic activity, Concepts of National Income. Unit-II Demand and Supply Analysis:-Demand, Law of demand; Supply, Law of Supply, Market Equilibrium, Elasticity of demand: price, income and cross elasticity. Measurement of Price Elasticity of demand. Demand Forecasting Methods, Uses of elasticity of demand for managerial decision-making. Unit-III Production Analysis: Production, Factors of Production, Production function, Laws of Production, Law of variable proportions, Least cost combination. Unit- IV Costs and Revenue functions: Nature of Costs and Revenue curves, Short run and long run cost curves, Economies and diseconomies of scale. Unit-V Market Structure:Perfect Competition: features, determination of pricing under perfect competition; Monopoly: features, types of monopoly, monopoly power, pricing under monopoly. Price discrimination.
Oligopoly: Features, kinked demand curve, cartels, price leadership. Monopolistic Competition: features, pricing under monopolistic competition. Course Outcome:
After the completion of the course, students will be able to understand the roles of managers in firms. They will also analyze the demand and supply conditions and assess the position of a company. The students will also able to design competition strategies, including costing, pricing, product differentiation, and market environment. Finally, they will analyze real-world business problems with a systematic theoretical framework.
References: (Text Books)
1.Atmanand. (2002). Managerial Economics. 1st Edition. Excel Books. 2.H. Craig Petersen, W.Chris Lewis, Sudhir K. Jain. (2006). Managerial Economics. 1st
Edition. Person Education. 3.D N Dwivedi. (2009). Managerial Economics. 8thEdition.Vikas Publishing House. 4.Suma, Damodaran. (2010). Managerial Economics. 2nd Edition. Oxford Higher Education. 5.Yogesh, Maheswari. (2012). Managerial Economics. 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall of India. 6.Marshall, Alfred. (2013). Principles of Economics. Macmillan India Ltd. 7.Paul G Keat. (2013). Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today's Decision Makers.
7th Edition. Publisher: Pearson. 8.H.L.Ahuja. (2015). Managerial Economics: Analysis of Managerial Decision Making. 9th
Edition. S. Chand and Company PVT. Ltd.
(Reference Books) 9.Paul G Keat, Philip K.Y. Young, Stephen E. Erfle. (2013). Managerial Economics tools for
Today’s Decision making. 7th Edition. Prentice Hall Publication.
10. Craig Petersen H., W. Cris Lewis. (2003). Managerial Economics. 4th Edition. Prentice-Hall of India. New Delhi.
11. Christopher R. Thomas, S. Charles Maurice. (2015). Managerial Economics. 12th Edition. Mc Graw Hill Education.
12. Dominick Salvotore. (2015). Managerial Economics in Global Economy. 8th Edition. Oxford University Press. USA.
13. Michael R. Baye. (2017). Managerial Economics and Business Strategy. 7th Edition. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
ACCOUNTING FOR MANAGERS (MBA 107)
Total: 100 L -T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessional: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: To enable students to critically analyze corporate financial statements, importance of cost in the business decisions and to impart the knowledge on Costing methods and techniques including budgetary control. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. UNIT - I Meaning, nature and role of accounting; accounting equation; accounting concepts and conventions; Management Accounting - Meaning, Functions, Scope and Limitations of Management Accounting, Financial Accounting vs. Management Accounting Analysis of Financial Statement - Ratio Analysis, Preparation of fund flow and cash flow statements. UNIT - II Cost: Concept, nature, elements and classification, methods for cost variability; cost control decision accounting. Marginal costing and Break Even Analysis; Meaning, cost – volume – profit analysis. Management Application for Marginal Income Accounting. Activity Based Costing - Concept, main activities and their cost drivers, developing ABC System. UNIT – III Budgetary control: Definition of a budget, Kinds of budgets, Preparation of a Budget, Budgetary Control, Flexible Budgeting, Zero Base Budgeting, Performance Budgeting Concept. UNIT – IV Standard Costing-Meaning, Types of Standard and their revision, Difference between budgeting and standard costing. Kinds of Variances, Their use in making appraisal and fixing responsibility, Procedure of setting standard cost - Material, Labour and Overhead. Responsibility Centres - Cost Centres, Profit Centres and Investment Centres, Inter divisional transfer pricing – concept and methods. UNIT – V Current issues-Social Accounting, Human Resource Accounting, Balance Score Card Discussion of real life business Cases.
Course Outcome: After studying the course, the students would be familiar with various types of tools of financial statement analysis for critically evaluation and methods, techniques of cost accounting for decision making and budgetary control. References:
(Text Books)
1. Garrison, Eric and Brewer (2012). Management Accounting, Irwin. 2. Hongren Charles T. (2001). Introduction to Management Accounting, Pearson Education. 3. Bhattacharya S.K. & Dearden John (2011). Accounting for Management, Tata McGraw-
Hill.
(Reference Books)
4. Naryanswami (2014). Financial Accounting, Prentice Hall India. 5. Ramanathan (2014). Accounting for Management, Oxford University Press. 6. M A Sahaf (2009). Management Accounting, Vikas Publishing. 7. Shah (2008). Management Accounting, Oxford University Press.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT (MBA - 109)
Total : 100 L-T Theory : 50 3-1 Sessionals : 50 (3.5 Credits) Time : 3 hrs Course Objective: The course is designed to increase the notion of the business organization functioning within the parameters of the internal and external environment. It will also assist students to realize the place of business within the financial system and present some significant economic principles pertinent to the behavior of business in answer to changes in the environment. Further contents of course will aid to communicate facts about and encourage consciousness of, existing issues, facts and events in the local nationwide and worldwide business world. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction- Concept, Features, Relevance for business, Types of environment - internal and external- micro and macro, Economic Environment - Nature and Structure of Indian Economy, Goals of five year plans, strategies and models of economic development in India since Independence. Economic Planning, Industrial policy, Monetary and Fiscal policy and its impact on business. Union & State Budget on business. Macro- economic scenario and its impact on business. Unit-II Social-Cultural Environment- Salient features of Indian society – class & caste structure of Indian society Secularism in Indian Society, Rural – Urban differences, Joint family system, Business Participation in social & cultural affairs, Size & growth rate of population, Age structure of population, Demographic dividend & its impact on business & growth. Effects of society and culture on business. Unit-III Political & Legal- Basic tenets of the Indian Constitution, Review of functions of Political institution in India-Legislature, Executive & Judiciary, their influence on Indian Business, Centre- State relationships evolving role of state /government. Unit-IV Economic Reforms Since 1991- Economic Reforms - Impact of Liberalisation, Globalisation and Privatisation on Indian economy, Financial Sector Reforms Fiscal System, Fiscal Sector Reforms, economic Reforms and Social Justice.
Unit – V Technological and Natural Environment in India- Technology & competitive Advantage Changing technological environment in India, in house R& D in Indian Industries, difference in the levels of science & technology across countries. Environmental protection & sustainable Industrial development, Environmental Degradation, Environmental policy, EMS Standard, ISO 14000. Course Outcome: The students will be able to: know the conception of business organization working within the parameters of the internal and external environment. They will also get the knowledge regarding current business practices lasting promising prospects and issues. More over they will also have the simplicity in undertaking SWOT analysis of business and understanding about fiscal market functioning. Students will become aware of the factors affecting business and they will also come to know that how economic systems in an economy has been developed. The learning about the economic and non-economic aspects related to business will also be acquired by the students. References: (Text Books)
1. Aswathappa, K. (2010). Essentials of Business Environment. Himalaya Publishing House. 2. Cherunilam, F. (2010). Business Environment. 18th edition. Himalaya Publishing House. 3. Paul, J. (2008). Business Environment. 3rd Edition. Tata McGraw-Hill Publication.
(Reference Books)
4. Goyal, Dr. A. (2010). Environment For Managers. 1st edition. V.K (India) Enterprises. 5. Neelamegam, V. (2010). Business Environment. Vrinda Publication. 6. F.Cherunillam (2014) Business Environment Text and Cases, Himalaya Publication. 7. Dutt & Sundaram (2013). Indian Economy. S. Chand Publisher, Delhi. 8. Shaikh, S (2010). Business Environment. Pearson Education India. 9. Goyal, Dr. A. (2010). Environment for Managers. 1st edition. V.K (India) Enterprises. 10. Neelamegam, V. (2010). Business Environment. Vrinda Publication.
SOFT SKILLS DEVELOPMENT (MBA 111)
Total: 100 L–T Theory: 50 3- 1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3hrs Course Objective: Introduce the students to the dynamics of Communication in the Business world and help them familiarize and practice the different kinds of communication tools. To give them practice in the nuances of spoken communication. To expose them to the different forms of Business communication and help them improve their competence in using English effectively Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Self-Development and Assessment, Self-Assessment, Self-Awareness, Perception and Attitudes, Values and Belief System, Personal Goal Setting, Career Planning, Self-Esteem, Building of Self-Confidence, Unit-II Components of communication, Principles of communication barriers, listening skills Verbal Communication, Includes Planning, Preparation, Delivery, Feedback and Assessment of activities like Public speaking, Group Discussion, Oral Presentation skills, Perfect Interview, Listening and observation skills, Body language. Unit-III Written Communication, Technical Writing–Technical Reports, Project Proposals, Brochures, Newsletters, Technical Articles, Technical Manuals, Official/Business Correspondence, Business letters, Memos, Progress report, Minutes of meeting, Event reporting, Use of style, Grammar and Vocabulary for effective technical writing, Use of: Tools, Guidelines for technical writing, Publishing, Unit-IV Use of Presentation graphics, Use of Presentation aids, Study of communication.Ethics and Etiquettes, Business Ethics, Etiquettes in social as well as Office settings, Email etiquettes, Telephone Etiquettes, Managerial ethics and ethics as a management professional, Civic Sense.
Unit-V Other Skills: Managing time, Meditation, Understanding roles of manager and their Responsibility, Exposure to work environment And culture in today’s job Places, Improving Personal Memory, Study skills that include Rapid reading, Notes taking, Complex problem solving, creativity.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of course the students will have the understanding of the need of a good communicator in a company and power of communication in building up their careers. It will impact the development of overall personality and personification.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Bovee, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2012). Excellence in business communication. Pearson Higher Ed.
2. Raymond Vincent Lesikar, John D. Pettit , Marie Elizabeth Flatley(1996). Business Communication.
3. Herta A. Murphy, Herbert William Hildebrandt , (2008) P. ThomasJane . Effective Business Communication. Tata McGraw Hill.
(Reference Books)
4. Meenakshi Raman, (2012) Prakash Singh . Business Communication. Oxford Press. 5. Chaturvedi&Chaturvedi(2006). Business Communication. Pearsons. 6. Khera, S. (2000). You can win. Macmillan.. 7. Covey, S. R. (2014). The 7 habits of highly effective families. St. Martin's Press.. 8. Rogers, J. (2012). Coaching skills: A handbook: A handbook. McGraw-Hill Education
(UK). 9. Gerson, S. J., Gerson, S. M., & Gerson, S. M. (2014). Technical communication: Process
and product (Vol. 83). Pearson. 10. Mohan, R. S. K. (2002). Business Correspondence and Report Writing, 3e. Tata McGraw-
Hill Education.
BUSINESS STATISTICS (MBA-113) Total: 100
L -T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessional: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3hrs Course objective: The objective of this paper is to acquaint the students with various statistical tools and techniques used to business decision making. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks Unit-I
Construction of frequency distributions and their analysis in the form of measures of Central Tendency (Mean, Median, Mode) and Dispersion; Types of measures, their relative merits, limitations and characteristics; Measures of Skewness. Unit-II
Correlation analysis- meaning & types of correlation, Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation andSpearman’s rank correlation; Regression analysis-meaning and two lines of regression; Relationshipbetween correlation and regression coefficients. Unit-III Probability- basic concepts and approaches, addition, multiplication and Bayes’ theorem. Probability distributions - meaning, types and applications, Binomial, Poisson and Normal distributions. Unit-IV Tests of significance- Hypothesis testing Large samples, Small samples: Chi-square test, Analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA). Unit-V Decision theory- decision making under uncertainty and risk, Bayesian analysis, decision trees. Course Outcome: After this course, the students will have the understanding of various statistical tools and techniques which will help them for decision making in various scenarios.
References:
(Text Books) 1. Levin& Rubin. (1998). Statistics for Business. Prentice Hall of India, Delhi. 2. Gupta S.P. and Gupta M.P. (1986). Business Statistics. Sultan Chand and Sons. Delhi. 3. Anderson. (2012). Quantitative Methods in Business. Thomson Learning. Bombay.
(Reference Books) 4. Anderson. (2011). Statistics for Business and Economics. Thomson Learning. Bombay. 5. Bhardwaj R.S. (2009). Business Statistics. Excel Books. 6. Kothari C.R. (2009). Quantitative Techniques. Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi. 7. Hooda R.P. (1994). Statistics for Business and Economics. McMillan India Ltd.
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN MANAGEMENT (MBA 115)
Total: 100 L-T-P Practical: 40 2-0-2 Internals: 60 (Credit-3.0) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The objective of this paper is to acquaint the students with latest software packages and the addins as well as the Open Source softwares like R-Studio. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I
Application Software used in Office, Components of Office- Word-Processor. Spreadsheets, Presentations, Database; Applications of in documentation preparation and making reports; preparation of questionnaires, presentations, Tables and Graphs, Online questionnaires, Mail Merge. Unit-II
Spreadsheet details, Addressing, Formula & Function, Various Functions-date functions, text functions, logical functions, If and Lookup family function, Filter, Conditional formatting, Charts in MS-Excel, Array Functions (Ctrl+Shift+Enter). Unit-III Macros and their application, Addins- Megastat, Data Analysis, Random Number Generation, Univariate and Bivariate Analysis using Addins. Unit-IV
Introduction to Statistical Softwares- Systat/Mystat, E-views etc. Data Handling, Univariate and Bivariate Analysis. Unit-V
Introduction to R & R-Studio- Concept of Variables/Vector/ Packages, R as Calculator, working on Directories, importing (Excel/SPSS/Stata/SAS) File and Exporting, Results, Univariate and Bivariate Analysis using R-Studio, Various Charts in R: Bar-chart, Pie chart, Scatter plot, Histogram, Boxplots.
Course Outcome:
After this course, the students will have a better understanding of various statistical packages, their usage and the genesis of open source softwares.
References: (Text Books)
1. June Jamrich Parsons. (2008). Computer Concepts. 7th Edition. Thomson Learning, Bombay.
2. Ann Shaffer, Patrick Carey, Kathy Finnegan, Joseph Adamski, Beverly Zimmerman. (2010). New Perspectives on Microsoft Office 2007. Brief; Cengage Learning.
3. Lambert, Joan; Frye, Curtis. (2016). Microsoft Office 2016 Step by Step. Microsoft Press, Washington.
(Reference Books)
4. Jelen, Bill. (2016). Advance Excel 2016 in Depth. BPB Publication. 5. Walkenbach, John. (2015). Microsoft Excel 2016 Bible: The Comprehensive Tutorial
Resource. Wiley Publication. 6. Alexander, Michael, Kusleika Dick. (2016). Excel 2016 Power Programming with VBA.
Wiley Publication. 7. Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T. (2011). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R.
Springer Science and Business Media. 8. Lander, J. P. (2014). R for Everyone: Advanced analytics and graphics. Pearson Education.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (MBA 102)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The purpose of this course is to acquaint the students with broad framework of financial decision making in a business unit. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Concept Of Finance: Meaning, Scope, and functions of Financial Management; Financial planning and strategies; Forms of Business Organization and Financial Considerations. Nature and Significance of Primary and Secondary Markets, objectives and functions, indices of BSE, NSE and OTCEI and its calculation.
Unit-II Financing Decisions: Long term Sources of Fund – equity share, preference shares, debentures, bonds, warrants, venture capital and ploughing back of profits. Short Term Sources of Funds – Commercial Paper, Certificate of Deposit, Treasury Bills. Concept and significance of Cost of Capital and its computation; Leverage; operating, financial and combined leverages and its implications, EBIT-EPS analysis; Capital structure: Theories and determinants of capital structure, Financial indifference point.
Unit-III
Investment Decisions: Investment Decisions: nature, importance, Time Value of Money, Appraisal Techniques for risk free projects (Discounted and Non-Discounted Techniques), Estimation of Discount Rate (Cost of Capital).
Working Capital Management - Meaning, Significance & factors influencing the level of working capital management. Management of cash, receivables and inventory. Unit-IV Dividend Decisions: Ploughing back of profits, forms of dividends, factors affecting dividend policy, dividend payout decisions.
Unit-V Relevant Issues: Corporate Restructuring: Acquisitions, change in ownership, Lease financing, Shareholders value and its calculation, EVA/VAR, Financial reengineering, Derivatives, Venture capital financing, stock Market Index calculation. Course Outcome: Upon successful completion of Financial Management, the student will be able to: demonstrate an understanding of the overall role and importance of the finance function. The students will also able to exhibit basic finance management knowledge and communicate effectively using standard business terminology.
References:
(Text Books)
1. James Van Horne (1979) : Essentials of Financial Management, Prentice Hall 2. Walker E. W. (1974) : Essentials of Financial Management, Prentice Hall 3. Khan, M .Y . (2010): Financial Management, Tata McGraw Hill, Delhi.
(Reference Books)
4. Pandey, I.M. (2009) : Financial Management, Vikas Publishing 5. Prasanna Chandra (2011) : Financial Management, Tata McGraw-Hill 6. Srivastava, Misra (2008) : Financial Management, Oxford University Press 7. Alice, John & Cheng (2010) : Financial Analysis, Planning and Forecasting, World
Scientific
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (MBA 104)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective:
This paper appreciates the importance of human resource management as a field of study and as a central management function. This course introduces the students with the basic concepts, functions and processes of human resource management. It will create awareness in the students regarding the role, functions and functioning of human resource department of the organizations. The main objective of this course is to teach the students that how an organization acquires, rewards, motivates, uses, and generally manages its people effectively by performing the wide range of people related duties in today’s increasingly complex workplace.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks Unit-I Introduction-Concept, Scope and Importance, Evolution of Human Resources Management, Challenges of HRM, HRM environment; HR Policies, HR Planning: Its Process and Importance. Job Analysis and Job Design. Contemporary Factors in Job Design. Unit-II Human resource acquisition- Recruitment; meaning, definition, importance, factors governing recruitment, Recruitment Process. Selection; Meaning, Definition, Selection Process. Selection testing and selection interview. Placement; meaning and purpose, problems in Placement. Orientation; meaning and purpose, typical orientation programs, requisites, evaluation and problems of orientation. New Developments in Recruitment, Selection, Placement and Induction Practices. Internal Mobility: Promotions, transfers and separations; purpose, principles, types, reasons, of promotions and transfers. Lay-off, resignation, dismissal or discharge, retrenchment and VRS. Unit-III Human resource development- training & development- Nature, Its Importance as source of competitive Advantage, Inputs in Training and Development; Training Needs Identification; Training Process: Deriving Instructional Objectives, Designing, Methods of Training and Development Implementation and Evaluation of the Training Program. New Developments in T&D field. Performance Appraisal: Its Process, Methods and Its Relevance. Performance Management. Potential Appraisal. Job Evaluation; Scope, Process and Methods of Job Evaluation. Career Planning and Development
Unit-IV Wages and salary administration- employee remuneration- Components of Remuneration, Ideal Remuneration System/Plan; Factor Influencing Employee Remuneration; Devising a Remuneration Plan; Incentive Payments& Schemes; Meaning, Definition, Scope, Importance, Prerequisites for an Effective Incentives System; Other Employee Benefits. Unit-V Contemporary issues in HRM-Employee Counseling, Worker’s Participation in Management, Employees safety and health, Trade Unions, Grievance handling, Employee empowerment, Issues in Industrial relations and industrial Conflict/Disputes. Six Sigma in HRM, Work-Life Balance, Employee Engagement. Competency Based HRM, HR Analytics: HR Metrics and Analytics, Objectives of HR Analytics, Stages of HR Analytics, HR Analytics and the HR Delivery Model. HR as Human Capital Course Outcome:
After the completion of this course students will be able to develop a comprehensive knowledge of issues affecting the employer-employee relationship. Based on this knowledge, students will be able to advance appropriate organizational HRM practices and be familiar with each element’s key concepts & terminology. They will be able to apply the principles and techniques of human resource management gained through this course to the discussion of major personnel issues. References: (Text Books)
1. K.Aswathapa. (2017). Human Resource Management: Text and Cases. 6th edition Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
2. Dessler and Varakkey. (2017). Human Resource Management 12th edition. Pearson Education
3. Biswajeet Pattnayak. (2013). Human Resource Management. Prentice Hall of India. 4. Michael Armstrong. ( 2014). Handbook of HRM Practice. Kogan Page. 5. V.S.P. Rao. (2009). Human Resource Management. Himalaya Publication House.
(Reference Books)
6. Raymond, Noe and Hollenbeck. (2010). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. Tata McGraw Hill.
7. Debashish Sengupta. (2012). Human Resource Management. Wiley India. 8. Sarah Gilmore. (2013). Human Resource Management. Oxford University Press. 9. Cascio and Nambudri. (2009). Managing HR, Productivity, Quality of Life and Profits.
Tata McGraw Hill. 10. Seema Sanghi. (2012). Human Resource Management. Macmillan, India Publication. 11. Aggarwala, Tanuja. (2010). Strategic HRM. Oxford University Press. 12. P. Jyothi. (2012). Human Resource Management. Oxford University Press. 13. Lepak and Gowan. (2011). Human Resource Management. Pearson Education. 14. R.S. Dwivedi (2003). Managing Human Resources and Industrial Relations in Indian
Enterprises. Galgotia Publishing Company, New Delhi.
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (MBA-106) Total: 100
L–T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessional: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The objective of the subject is to provide the various aspects of production management as well as various quantitative techniques which are of great importance for quantitative decision-making. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Objectives of Production/Operations Management- Nature and Types of Production/Operation, Production Capacity – Planning and Control, Plant Location. Unit-II Plant Layout, Work Design and Measurement, Maintenance and Material Handling Methods, Forecasting. Unit-III L P formulation- Formulation of problem and its solution by graphical and simplex methods; special cases in simplex method: infeasibility, degeneracy, unboundedness and multiple optimal solutions. Unit-IV Transportation problems including transhipment problems- Special cases in transportation problems: unbalanced problems, degeneracy, maximization objective and multiple optimal solutions; assignment problems including traveling salesman’s problem. Special cases in assignment problems: unbalanced problems, maximization objective and multiple optimal solutions. Unit-V PERT/CPM- Difference between PERT and CPM, network construction, calculating floats & probability considerations in PERT, time -cost trade-off. Game theory, pure and mixed strategy games; principle of dominance; two persons zero sum game;
Course Outcome: At the end of the course, the students will have an understanding of the various concepts of production and operations management as well as the various techniques of decision making.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Panneerselvam. R. (2006). Operations Research. PHI, New Delhi. 2. Kapoor, V. K. (2010). Operations Research. Sultan Chand and Sons, New Delhi. 3. Taha, Hamdy A. (2008). Operations Research. Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
(Reference Books)
4. Chary, S. N. (2009). Production and Operations Management. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
5. Buffa, Sarin. (2007). Modern Production / Operations management. 6. Sharma J.K (2009), “Operations Research” Macmillan, New Delhi.
MARKETING MANAGEMENT (MBA - 108)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credit-3.5) Course Objective: This course intends to provide an experienced-based approach to marketing theory and its practical application. Through a combination of interactive discussions, cases, practical examples, individual assignments, and a group project, the course applies marketing topics to consumer and business-to-business products and services. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction: Defining Marketing for 21st Century, Developing marketing strategies and plans, Conducting marketing research and demand, Gathering information and scanning the environment. Unit-II Connecting with Customers: Analyzing Consumer and Business Markets, Identifyingmarket segments and targets, Developing Positioning strategy. Unit-III Developing value (Product and Pricing): Setting Product strategy, Designing and Managing services, Developing Pricing strategies and Programs. Unit-IV Communicating Value: Integrated Marketing Communications, Personal and Mass Communications. Unit-V Delivering Value: Designing and Developing Integrated marketing channels, Managing Retailing, Wholesaling and logistics. Introducing new market offerings, Developing a holistic organization, case Studies.
Course Outcome: In this comprehensive and practical introduction to marketing management, students improve their ability to make effective marketing decisions, including assessing marketing opportunities and developing marketing strategies and implementation plans.Students gain significant experience in communicating and defending their marketing recommendations and building on the ideas of others.
References:
(Text Book)
1. Kotler, P., and Keller, K. (1988). L. (2006). Marketing management. (Reference Books)
2. Ramaswamy. (2009). Marketing Management: Global Perspective, Indian Context. MacMillan Publisher India Ltd. New Delhi.
3. Rajan Sexena. (2010). Marketing Management. 4th edition. Tata McGraw Hill. 4. Edd Applegate, Art Johnsen. (2007). Cases in Advertising and Marketing Management:
Real Situations for Tomorrow. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. 5. Kenneth E. Clow, Donald Baack. (2012). Cases in Marketing Management. Sage
Publications. 6. Sharma, D. (2014).MKTG 2/e Cengage Learning.
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (MBA-110)
Total: 100 L –T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The course will facilitate students to know the Total Quality Management concept and principles and a variety of tools accessible to accomplish Total Quality Management. It will create them to comprehend the statistical approach for quality control. Further it will also craft responsiveness about the ISO and QS certification process and its necessitate for the industries. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks Unit-I
Introduction to TQM: What is TQM? Understanding concepts of quality, scope of TQM, TQM:
the guiding principle, customer orientation, productivity improvement through quality.
Unit-II
Quality Philosophies: Deming, Juran, Philip, Genichi Taguchi, TQM Model.
Unit-III
Basic Statistical Tools: Introduction, elements of risk, total process risk, step-by-step problem
solving process, Pareto Analysis, concentration diagrams, activity sampling, data handling and
displaying P-FMEA.
Unit-IV
Problems Solving and Continuous Improvement: Introduction, implementation of six sigma,
Kaizen kanban and JIT, 5-S, quality circles and Zero defects
Unit-V
Relevant Issues: Cost of quality, bench-marking, Re-engineering and TQM, HRM and TQM, ISO-
9000 series, Quality awards, Emerging Concepts.
Course Outcome: On successful completion of the course students will be able to understand the essential principles of Total Quality Management and select suitable statistical techniques for getting better processes
They will also be able to write reports to management telling processes and advocating ways to look up them. The course will also develop their research skills that will allocate them to maintain abreast of changes in the field of Total Quality Management.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Dale H. Besterfiled, et al. (2004). Total Quality Management. Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN 81-297-0260-6.
(Reference Books)
2. James R.Evans & William M.Lidsay. (2002). The Management and Control of Quality. 5th edition. South-Western (Thomson Learning), ISBN 0-324-06680-5.
3. Feigenbaum. A.V. (1991). Total Quality Management. McGraw-Hill. 4. Oakland. J.S. (1989). Total Quality Management. Butterworth Hcinemann Ltd., Oxford. 5. Narayana V. and Sreenivasan, N.S. (1996). Quality Management – Concepts and Tasks.
New Age International. 6. Zeiri. (1991). Total Quality Management for Engineers. Wood Head Publishers. 7. Lt. Gen. H. LaI. (1990). Total Quality management. Wiley Eastern Limited. 8. Greg Bounds. (1994). Beyond Total Quality Management. McGraw Hill. 9. Menon, H.G. (1992). TQM in New Product manufacturing. McGraw Hill. 10. Shailendra Nigam. (2005). Total Quality Management an integrated approach. Excel
Books. 11. Bester field, Dole, H. Michel, Carol Bester field, Bester-field. (2011). Total Quality
Management. Pearson Education. 12. Bharat Wakhlu. (1998). Total Quality Excellence through Organization Wide
Transformation. Wheeler Publishing. 13. Samuel Kho. (1995). TQM Integrated Approach. Kogan Page Limited, London. 14. Evans James R. and Dean, James W. (2006). Total Quality Management, Organization and
Strategy, Thomson Asian Pvt. Ltd.
BUSINESS ETHICS (MBA -112)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3 hrs
Course Objective: The course will help to provide an overview of current thinking and developments in the field of corporate governance. It will also enable students to critically examine the ethical dilemmas and to understand the importance of ethical principles and governance in globalised economy. Further it will try to develop an understanding of ethics and values in the business community and their relationship to corporate governance.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I Introduction: Concept and principles of ethics - need and importance, personal vs. business ethics, code of conduct and ethics for managers, Management and ethics, Ethical decision making, Ethical organizations Unit-II Conflicts and Ethical Dilemmas: Concept of ethical dilemmas- Corporate dilemmas over ethical behaviour, Sources of ethical problems, Strategies to resolve ethical dilemmas, Walton’s six models of Business conduct, Traditional and Contemporary moral Philosophies. Unit-III Ethical Decision Making: A Decision Making Model: Ethics as Making decisions and choices, Kohlberg’s Model of Cognitive moral development, factors influencing ethical decision making, Personal values vs. ethical decision making, process of making good ethical decision making Unit-IV Ethical Issues in Business Functional Areas: Ethical issues in marketing, finance, human resource, Environmental ethics, Ethics in IT Industry, Globalisation and ethics, Consumer protection and ethics, Whistle Blowing - Concept, Types, guidelines, legal provisions and some cases, Theories of Governance. Unit-V Corporate Social Responsibility: Concept, relevance and need of CSR, views about CSR, models of implementing CSR, benefits of CSR, Ethics and CSR, Indian Cases Corporate Governance - Concept of Corporate governance, Significance, issues in corporate governance, areas of corporate
governance, benefits to corporation and community, Indian model of corporate governance, legal provisions, some good governance cases. Course Outcome: Upon successful completion of the requirements for this course, students will be able to:define, explain and illustrate the theoretical foundations of business ethics; re-examine their knowledge of business and economic concepts from an ethical perspective; explain and illustrate the importance, for business and the community. References: (Text Books)
1. Fernando, A.C. (2006). Corporate Governance: Principles Policies & Practices. Pearson Education.
2. Balachandran, S., Raja, K.C.R. and Nair, B.K. (2008). Ethics, Indian Ethos and Management. 2nd edition. Mumbai: Shroff Publishers and Distributors .
(Reference Books)
3. Velasquez, Manuel G. (2012). Business Ethics: Concept & Cases. PHI Learning, 4. Ghosh, B. (2006). Ethics in Management and Indian Ethos. Vikas Publication. 5. Albuquerque, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Principles and Practices. Oxford University
Press. 6. Crane, Andrew. (2011). Business Ethics. Oxford University Press. 7. Manuel G (2017). Business Ethics. Velasquez, Pearson Education. 8. Biswanath Ghosh (2009). Ethics in Management and Indian Ethos. Vikas Publication. 9. P.S. Bajaj, Raj Aggarwal. (2004). Business Ethics: An Indian Perspective. Dreamtech
Press. 10. S.K. Bhatia. (2004). Business Ethics and Corporate Governance. Deep and Deep
Publications. 11. Francis. (2009). Business Ethics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. 12. Debashis Guha. (2008). Practical and Professional Ethics: Economic and business ethics.
Concept Publishing Company.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (MBA-114)
Total: 100
L–T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The objective of this paper is to impart knowledge about various stages of the research processes and their application in decision making. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Nature, scope and need of business research- managerial value of business research: components of theory–concepts, constructs, variables, definitions and hypothesis; the process of research:structure of research proposal. Unit-II Research design concept and types- validity and reliability aspects; sampling design and techniques; factors influencing sample size; nature of measurement. Unit-III Characteristics of sound measurement-nature of measurement scales; scale construction techniques: sources and methods of data collection; questionnaire designing. Unit-IV Data preparation and descriptive analysis- hypothesis testing; parametric and non -parametric tests (analysis of variance, x2 test, sign test, the Mann -Whitney U-test, Kruskal – Wallis H-test); computer program for analysis. Unit-V Nature of Multivariate-analysis- Introduction to Multivariate techniques, Ingredients of formal reports; construction of formal reports; nature of oral reports; mechanism of documentation and bibliography construction, Online citation builder Course Outcome: After completing this course the students will have an understanding of the various aspects of research and this shall help them in their summer internship as well as dissertation reports.
References:
(Text Books)
1. C.R. Kothari. (2004). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. New Age International Publisher.
2. R. Panneerselvam. (2014). Research Methodology. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
(Reference Books)
3. William Zikmund, Barry Babinjon Carr (2012). Business Research Methods. Cengage Learning.
4. Alan Bryman, Emma Bell (2011). Business Research Methods. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.
5. Naval Bajpai (2011). Business Research Methods. Pearson Publishers. 6. Levin and Rubin (1997). Statistics for Business. Prentice Hall of India, Delhi. 7. Malhotra, N., Hall, J., Shaw, M., and Oppenheim, P. (2006). Marketing research: An
applied orientation. Pearson Education Australia.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (MBA-116)
Total: 100 L–T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: This course aims at providing an insight of various components of information systems, software development methodologies and their stages of development. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks Unit-I Data and Information. MIS- need and concepts, factors influencing MIS and characteristics of MIS, Technology of MIS. Structure of MIS. Decision Making and role of MIS. Unit-II Data communication. Basic H/W required, Channel features and concept of Distributed Data bases. Decision Support System: Overview, components and classification, steps in constructing a DSS, role in business, group decision support system Unit-III Information system for strategic advantage, strategic role for information system, breaking business barriers, business process reengineering, improving business qualities. Unit-IV Planning for MIS- System Development Methodologies; Conceptual and detailed designs of MIS. Information system analysis and design, information SDLC, hardware and software acquisition, system testing, documentation and its tools, conversion methods, System implementation Strategies and process; System Evaluation and Maintenance. Unit-V Role of CBIS in an Organization, MIS Models, Functional application of MIS (viz. Marketing IS, Manufacturing IS, Accounting IS, Financial IS, Personal IS, Production IS).
Course Outcome: After this students, the students will have a better understanding of software development methodologies and various function information systems. References: (Text Books)
1. Jawadekar (2013). Management Information Systems. TMH, N Delhi. 2. Brien, James (2008). Management Information System. Tata McGraw Hill, Delhi. 3. Stair (2013). Principles of Management System. Thomson Learning, Bombay.
(Reference Books)
4. Mckeown (1993). Information Technology and the Networked Economy. Thomson Learning, Bombay.
5. Brady (2000). Advance Cases in MIS. Thomson Learning, Bombay. 6. Murdick& Ross (1995). Management Information System. PHI, Delhi. 7. Kanter, J. (1984). Management Information System. PHI, Delhi.
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
CURRICULUM
(w.e.f. Session 2019-2020)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
KURUKSHETRA-136119
Vision of Department
To be a role model in management education and research responsive to global
challenges.
Mission of Department
M1: To impart quality management education.
M2: To develop innovative professionals, entrepreneurs and researchers.
M3: To generate prime knowledge resources for the growth of industry, society and
futuristic knowledge focusing on the socio-economic needs.
PEOs Statements
PEO1: To attain managerial position in organizations.
PEO2: To inculcate innovative and sustainable solution to accomplish the dynamic
socio-economic needs.
PEO3: To enhance research acumen for the growth of industry and society.
PEO4: To develop entrepreneurial spirit.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS (MBA 201)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: This course examines the international environment for business and offers theoretical and practical background to implement strategies and marketing for successfully penetrating international markets and managing international firms. This course will help the students to look at strategic options for major firm functions such as marketing and finance, and examine how these functions relate to the firm's overall international strategy. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction to International Business: Defining International Business, Types of International Business, the external environment, the economic & political environment, cultural environment. Unit-II Balance of Payment and Adjustment Mechanism: Balance of payment structure, balance of trade, BOP effects on MNCs of home & host countries, Automatic adjustment in BOP.
Unit-III Theories of International Business and International Economic Institutions: Basic trade theories- absolute advantage theory, comparative cost theory, Hecksher- Ohlintheory, Gains from trade. Euro currency market, Multilateral economic institutions- IMF, World Bank, WTO, UNCTAD. Unit-IV Export Promotion and Barriers to Trade and Exchange Rate: Free trade zones, export promotion strategies, ECGC, EPCs, Institutional framework in India. Tariff and non-tariff barriers, Forex market mechanisms, exchange rate determination, risks in foreign exchange market, currency risk, forward contract, swap, FIIs. Unit-V Economic Integration and MNCs: Regional economic integration and trading agreements (SAARC, NAFTA, BIMSTEC, ASEAN), Basic nature and determinants of Foreign Direct Investment, Multinational corporations- emergence, role in international business.
Course Outcome:
After completing this course the students will learn and understand how business is conducted in the international arena. Students will also learn how managerial skills are usedto meet the challenges faced in the global workplace.
References:
(Text Book)
1. Daniels, J. D., Radebaugh, L. H., & Sullivan, D. P. (1998). International business: Environments and operations. Addison-Wesley.
2. Aswathappa, A. (2005). International Business 2nd edition. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
(Reference Books)
3. Cherunilam, F. (2010). International business: text and cases. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. 4. Hill, C. (2008). International business: Competing in the global market place. Strategic
Direction. 24(9). 5. Raj Aggarwal (2002). International Business. Excel Books. 6. Suresh Bedi (2009). International Business Environment. Excel Books. 7. Salvatore, D. (2012). International economics. Wiley Global Education. 8. Bhalla, V. K., and Ramu, S. S. (2000). International Business: Environment and
Management. Anmol Publications. 9. Charles W. L. Hill (2007). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
BUSINESS LAW AND CORPORATE TAXATION (MBA 203)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The course is designed to provide an understanding of legal processes involved in management of an organization. The main focus is on understanding basic laws affecting the operation of a Business Enterprise Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Intellectual Property Rights (Patent, Trademark and Copy Right).
Unit-II
Cyber Law and Competition Act.
Unit-III
Contract Act and Sales of Goods Act.
Unit-IV
Negotiable Instrument Act and Company Act: Memorandum of Association, Article of Association, and Comparative Provisions related to Public and Private limited Companies, Board Meetings.
Unit-V
Goods and Services Tax (GST)- Applicability, Registration, Return and Penalties, Tax Incentives for Export Business.
Course Outcome:
After completing this course, the students will have an understanding of various aspects and dynamics of legislation that affect any business.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Tulsian P.C. (2014). Business Law McGraw Hill. 2. Kapoor, N. D. (2011). Handbook of Industrial Law. S. Chand.
(Reference Books)
3. Gonga, P. P. S. (2016). A Text book of Company law. S. Chand. 4. Pathak, Akhileshwar (2017). Legal Aspects of Business 5th edition. McGraw Hill
Education. 5. Singhania (2008). Direct Taxes Ready Reckoner. Taxmann Publications Pvt. Ltd. 6. Sen, A. K. and Mitra, J. K. (2013). Commercial Law (including Company Law) and
Industrial Law. World Press Pvt Ltd. 7. Mitra, S.D. and Choudhary T. G. (2017). Mitra's Legal and Commercial Dictionary.
Eastern Law House. 8. Taxmann (2018). GST Manual with GST Law Guide. 7th Edition.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT (MBA 205)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessional: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The main objective of the course is to provide the basics conceptual framework on entrepreneurship development and management of business enterprise. It will help students to understand the contribution of small scale industries in the growth and development of individual and the nation. Further course will help students to acquaint students with the emerging challenges and concepts in the field of entrepreneurship.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction To Entrepreneurship- Concept and Types of entrepreneurs,, Significance of Entrepreneur in Economic Development, Economic, social and psychological need for entrepreneurship, Characteristics, qualities, and pre-requisites of entrepreneur; Creativity and innovation, Methods and procedures to start and expand one’s own business, Life cycle of new business and relationship with large enterprise, Achievement motivation, Environmental Factors affecting success of a new business, Reasons for the failure and visible problems for business.
Unit-II
Project Feasibility Study-Preparation of Feasibility Reports: Selection of factory location, Demand Analysis, Market potential measurement, Capital saving and project costing, Working capital requirements, profit and tax planning; Economic, Technical, Financial and Managerial Feasibility of Project.
Unit-III
Sustaining competitiveness in entrepreneurship- Maintaining Competitive Advantage, The Changing Role of the Entrepreneur: Mid Career Dilemmas, Harvesting Strategies versus Go for Growth.
Unit-IV
Government support to new enterprise- Incentives, Sources of Finance, Role of Govt. and Promotional agencies in EDP, Role of DIC, Ministry of MSME, Various government support to MSME.
Unit-V
Entrepreneurship Development Programmes- Entrepreneurship Development Programmes; Role of technical institutions in EDP, Role of various institutions in developing entrepreneurship in India, EDI Ahmedabad.
Course Outcome:
Students will be able to define, identify and apply the principles of entrepreneurial. They will also be able to apply the principles of viability of businesses, new business proposals, and opportunities within existing businesses. Students will also be able to understand for preparing a startup business plan emphasizing financing, marketing, and organizing; Further they will also be able to define, identify and/or apply the principles of new venture financing, growth financing, and growth financing for existing businesses.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Desai.Vasant (2008). Dynamics of Entrepreneurial Development and Management. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
(Reference Books)
2. Hisrich, Manimala (2013). Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill Education India. 3. Gupta, Srinivasan (2013). Entrepreneurship Development in India. Sultan Chand & Sons. 4. K Ramchandran (2008). Entrepreneurship Development. Tata McGraw- Hill Education. 5. David H. Holt (2009). Entrepreneurship. New Venture Creation. PHI Learning. 6. Robert D. Hisrich, Michael P. Peters, Dean A. Shepherd (2013). Entrepreneurship. Tata
McGraw Hill Education. 7. H. Nandan (2013). Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship. PHI Learning.
LABOUR LAWS (MBA- 211)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L -T Sessionals: 50 3-1 Time: 3hrs (Credit-3.5)
Course Objective:
This course is offered as a human resource management elective in the second year. The objective of this paper is to help the students to understand the legal aspects of the human resources in the organization which governs employment relationships. The paper will develop awareness amongst students about the various acts and existing legislative provisions related to wages, health, safety, compensation, settlement of disputes, bonus, provident funds and many more required for smooth functioning of an organization.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Laws Related to Working Hours, Conditions of Services and Employment-The Factories Act, 1948, The Mines Act 1952, The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; The Sales Promotion Employees Act 1976.
Unit-II
Laws Related to Industrial Relations-The Trade Union Act, 1926,. The Industrial Disputes Act 1947. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
Unit-III
Laws Related to Wages-The Payment Of Wages Act, 1936 & The Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act,2001. The Minimum Wages Act, 1948: The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
Unit-IV
Law Related to Equality and Empowerment of Women, Deprived and Disadvantaged Sections of Society-The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, The Equal Remuneration Act 1976, The Child Labour(Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986.
Unit-V
Laws related to Social Security-The Employee’s State Insurance Act, 1948; The Unorganized Worker’s Social Security Act 2008. The Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Gratuity Act 1972.
Course Outcome:
After completing the course, students will be aware of the employer’s obligations under the statutes and employee/workers rights under the Acts. The powers of the government/authorities under the Act and the consequences of non compliance of the statutes. Develop understanding of the fundamental principles and how they apply to certain legal problems will certainly enable students in avoiding conflict with labour. Students are expected to demonstrate knowledge in labour laws which protect minimum labour standards and improve working conditions, provide social security benefits, and promote the general welfare of the workers.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Kapoor.N.D. (2013). Elements of Industrial Law. Sultan Chand and Sons. 2. Malik, P.L. (2010). Handbook of Labour and Industrial Laws. Eastern Book Company, 3. Padhi, P.K (2010). Labor and Industrial Laws. Prentice Hall of India. 4. Srivastava, ,( 2007). Labour and Industrial Laws. Vikas Publications, New Delhi,.
(Reference Books)
5. C S Venkataratnam (2009). Industrial Relations, Oxford University Press. 6. Mamoria, Mamoria and Gankar (2009). Dynamics of IR, HPH, New Delhi. 7. Sinha, P.R.N. et al (2009). Industrial Relations, Trade Unions, and Labour Legislation.
Pearson Education, 8. Monappa, Nambudri and Selvaraj (2009). Industrial Relations and Labour Laws, Tata
McGraw Hill Publishing India. 9. B D Singh, (2009). Industrial Relations and Labour Laws. Excel Publications.
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT (MBA- 221) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L-T Sessionals: 50 3-1 Time: 3hrs (Credit-3.5)
Course Objective:
An elective course of human resource management in the second year introduces students to the social science techniques and change interventions used to improve organizational effectiveness and also to enhance the personal development of individuals. It focuses on the philosophy, history, and evolving approaches associated with organizational change and development, with special focus on initiating and managing change. This paper also introduces methods which are commonly used to identify organizational problems, understand the underlying causes for these problems, and collect information and data about the causes or problems, and present diagnostic results.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks
Unit-I
Organisational Change- Concept, Forces for Change, Types of Change in Organisations. Process, Models of Organisational Change, Resistance to Change, Overcoming Resistance to Change
Unit-II
Introduction and Foundations of Organisational Development- Organizational Development: Concept, Scope, Definition and Important Characteristics of OD, Values, Beliefs and Assumptions underlying the field of OD. System Theory, Parallel Learning Structure, Action Research.
Unit-III
Process of Organizational Development- Diagnosis- Relevance of diagnosis for OD, Importance of Correct diagnosis in success of OD, Approaches/Models of Diagnosis: SIX BOX model, 7 S Framework, Force Field Analysis.
Unit-IV
OD Interventions-overview, Team Building Interventions and their Rationales; Intergroup team building and the Organization Mirror Intervention; Personal, Interpersonal and Group Process Interventions; Nature of Comprehensive OD interventions; Structural Interventions & OD, conditions important for successful OD efforts.
Unit-V
OD Consultant & Issues in OD- Choosing the OD Consultant. Role and competencies of the OD Consultant, Ethical issues in OD Consulting, Organizational Power and Politics and its impacts on OD. Future Terms and Applications of OD, OD in Public Sector Enterprises.
Course Outcome:
After completing the course, students will be able to explain organizational change processes and learn approaches and strategies for managing organizational change. They will recognize an improvement in their ability to synthesize, articulate, and disseminate information and knowledge concerning organizational change to others through dialogue and critique.
References:
(Text Books)
1. French, Bell and Vohra (2017). Organization Development. 16th edition, Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd
2. Singh, Kavita (2010). Organizational Change and Development, second edition, Excel Books.
(Reference Books)
3. French and Bell (1991) Organizations Development. Prentice Hall of India. New Delhi, 4. French, W L. etc (1990). Organization Development theory, Practice and research 3rd
edition, Universal Book Stall, New Delhi 5. Robbins , Judge and Vohra (2011). Organisational Behaviour, Pearson Education India 6. Kinicki and Krietner (2011). OrganisationalBehaviour, McGraw Hill Publications 7. Newstrom (2011) Organisational Behaviour at Work, McGraw Hill Publications 8. Baron and Greenberg(2011). Behaviour in Organisations, PHI 9. Jones and Mathew (2011). Organisation Designs, Theory and Change, Pearson Education 10. Pareek, Udai (2012). Understanding Organisational Behaviour. Oxford University Press.
MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT (MBA-231)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L–T Sessional: 50 3- 1 Time: 3hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
This course aims to cover the essential concepts in training and development to provide a sound foundation for understanding the key issues and to provide an in-depth understanding of the role of the training in the human resource development. This course enables the students to manage training processes and system for developing human resource of the organization. This course will help the students to gain a understanding of management development and evaluation of training programme.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction: Training concept, types, need, principles - Training and Development– Training Process – an overview. Role and responsibilities of training manager. Training and Development in India. Training Needs Analysis (TNA): The Process, Approaches, Scope of TNA, and Organizational Analysis: Training Process Design, Output of TNA.
Unit-II
Training Program Designing: Considerations in Designing Effective Training Programs: Selecting and Preparing the Training Site, Selecting Trainers& Trainees, Learning Environment, Pre-training Communication, Facilitation of Training with Focus on Trainee (Motivation of Trainee, Reinforcement, Goal setting) Methods /Techniques: Training Climate and Pedagogy - Different training methods and techniques.
Unit-III
Evaluation: Evaluation of Training Programmes – Need, Principles, Criteria, Levels, and Types & Methods/Techniques of evaluation- Traditional and modern methods, Transfer of Training: Strategies for effective training transfer.
Unit-IV
Management Development: Need, Importance, Process, Methods/Techniques, Evaluation of Management Development Programs. Mentoring and Coaching: Concept, Need, Importance and Styles, Career Management.
Unit-V
Contemporary Approaches/Issues in Training & Development: E-Learning & Use of Technology in Training, Future Issues in Training & Development: New Technologies, Virtual Work Arrangement, Multiple Delivery Methods, Outsourcing Training, Future Trends in Trainers’ Skills and Competencies.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of this course, students will be able to understand the importance of training and development for organization as well as for employees. The students will also be aware about the contemporary approaches and issues in training and development.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Noe, Raymond & Kodwani, Amitabh (2018), Employee Training and Development, 7th Edition, Tata McGraw Hill Education, New Delhi.
2. Deb, Tapomoy, (2008), Training and Development: Concepts and Applications, 5th Edition, Ane Books India.
3. Garry Dessler and Biju Varakkey, (2012), Human Resource Management, 14th Edition, Pearson Education.
(References Books)
4. Michael Armstrong, (2014), Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 12th Edition. Kogan Page India.
5. Lynton, R. Pareek, U., (2012), Training for Development, 3rd Revised Edition, Sage Publications, New Delhi, 2012.
6. Sahu RK (2009), Management Training for Development, Excel Publication. 7. Janakiram, B. (2009), Training and Development, Biztantra. 8. Blanchard and Thacker (2005), Effective Training Systems, Strategies and Practices, 4th
Edition, Pearson Publication.
COUNSELLING SKILLS FOR MANAGERS (MBA- 241)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L-T Sessionals: 50 3-1 Time: 3hrs (Credit-3.5)
Course Objective:
The objective of this course is to help the students understand the workplace in today’s competitive world and to know the importance of counseling. This course also covers roles and skills of counselor, applications of counselling, counselling strategies, ethics and codes. This course takes students through the therapies of counseling.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction and Process: Counselling: Definition, Approaches, Types, Values and Goals of Counselling, Emergence and Growth of Counselling. Counselling Process: Initial encounter with the client, Developing relationship, Problem Identification, Goal Setting, Plan of Action and its Implementation, Termination of Relationship and Follow-up.
Unit-II
Roles and Skills of Counselor: Referral Procedures, Role of Counselor& Client in various stages. Skills and Attitudes required in Counselling: Verbal and Non-verbal Communication skills, Listening Skills; Advanced Skills in Counselling: Advanced empathy, theme identification, self-disclosure, perception-check, interpretation, clarification, confrontation and immediacy.
Unit-III
Applications of Counselling: Key Competencies, Qualities & Values for a Professional Counselor, Dilemmas for a managerial counsellor. Applications of Counseling Skills in Modern Organisations. Performance Counselling: Meaning, Objectives and Process.
Unit-IV
Therapies: Counselling Therapies: Cognitive Therapy, Behavioural Therapy, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Psychoanalytic Therapy, Person-Centered Therapy, Gestalt and Existential Therapy.
Unit-V
Counselling Strategies, Ethics and Codes:Counselling Strategies & Interventions: Behavioural, Decision Making, Problem Solving Techniques. Ethics in Counselling: Ethical Principles & codes of conduct for professional counselors. Guidelines for Effective Counselling.
Course Outcome:
After completing this course the students will be conversant with counselling concept, goals and its process. The students will be able to understand the skill and advanced skills which are required in counselling. The students will be well versed with the performance counselling and different counselling therapies.
References: (Text Books)
1. Singh, Kavita (2010), Counseling Skills for Managers, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall of India, Delhi.
2. Rao, S. Narayana, (2007), Counselling and Guidance, 2nd edition, Tata McGraw Hill Education.
3. Mitchell and Gibson, (2007), Counselling and Guidance, 7th Edition, Pearson Education India.
(References Books)
4. Gladding, S.T., (2017), Counselling A Comprehensive Profession, 7th Edition, Pearson Education
5. Patterson, Lewis, (2008) The Counselling Process, 6th Edition, Cengage Learning India. 6. Burnard, Philip, (2009), Counselling Skills Training, 2nd Edition, Kogan Page India. 7. Feltham and Dryden, (2012), Brief Counselling, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill Publishing. 8. Kotler, Jeffrey, (2008), Counselling Theories and Practices, Cengage Learning India.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT (MBA-251)
Total: 100 L –T-P Theory: 50 3- 1-0 Sessionals: 50 (Credit-3.5) Time: 3 hrs
Course Objective:
This course observes the significance of an efficient performance management system in helping organizations describe and attain short and long term aims. It gives detail and strengthens the idea that performance management is not a one-time managerial event, but an in progress process of planning, assisting, measuring and improving individual and organizational performance. In adding together, the course highlights the importance of evaluating the usefulness of human resource activities that are intended to augment individual and organizational performance.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
UNIT-I
Introduction to Performance Management- Concept, aims and role of performance management system, performance management contribution, challenges of performance management, theoretical foundations of performance management.
UNIT-II
Overview of Performance Management Process- Performance management process: prerequisites; performance planning, execution, performance assessment, performance review and performance renewal and recontracting.
UNIT-III
Performance Management and Strategic Planning-definition and objective of strategic planning, process of linking performance management to the strategic plan: strategic planning, developing strategic plans at the unit level, job descriptions, individual and team performance
Unit-IV
Implementation- Defining performance and choosing measurement approach: determinants of performance, performance dimensions and approaches to measuring performance; measuring results and behaviors: systems of measuring result and behaviour; gathering performance information: criteria of determining performance; implementing a performance management: process of performance management implementation system.
Unit-V
Key Issues-Reward-based performance management; team-based performance management and leadership-based performance management-concepts, significance, interventions and drivers; competency mapping: meaning, methods, linkage to performance planning; strategy maps and Balance score card; counselling and coaching; role and challenges of HR professionals in performance management; ethics in performance management.
Course Outcome:
Upon successful completion of this course, the student will reliably able to demonstrate the ability to: devise an organization’s performance management procedure that is submissive with law and holds up organizational mission and plan, evaluate and distinguish a variety of organizational performance management programs and most excellent practices and describe qualities of effectual performance management systems.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Deb Tapomoy (2009). Performance & Reward Management.,Ane Books Pvt. Ltd. 2. Bhattacharyya, Dipak Kumar (2011). Performance Management, Systems and Strategies, 1/e;
New Delhi: Pearson
(Reference Books)
3. Herman Aguinis (2009). Performance Management, Pearson Education. 4. T. V. Rao (2002). Appraising & Developing Managerial Performance, Excel Books 5. GaneshShermon (2004). Competency Based HRM, TMH. 6. Seema Sanghi(2004). A Handbook of Competency Mapping, Response Books. 7. Radha R Sharma (2006). 360 Degree Feedback, Competency Mapping and Assessment
Centers, , TMH. 8. Armstrong, Michael,(2014) ‘Performance Management – Key strategies and Practical
Guidelines’, Kogan Page 9. Shields, John, (2007) Managing Employees Performance and Reward’, Cambridge
University Press India. 10. Dipak Kumar Bhattacharyya,(2009) Performance Management System & Strategies,
Pearson Education. New Delhi 11. Robert Bacal, (2011) Performance Management ,McGraw Hill 12. Dines K. Srivastava (2005) Strategies for Performance Management, Excel Books New
Delhi 13. Candela, Srinivas (2009) Performance Management: Strategies, Interventions and Drivers,
PHI, 14. Saks, Account and Be court (2008) Performance Management through training and
development Cengage India Learning.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MARKETS (MBA-213) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The course seeks tomake understood the students with the various aspects of money and capital market of India namely its operating system, various instruments, participants and legal framework. It seeks to develop the analytical skills required for the stock market analysis and operations in the context of capital market. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Indian Financial System – An Overview: Introduction: nature and role of Financial System; Financial System and Financial markets; financial system and economic development.
Unit-II
Financial Markets: Money and capital markets; Money market - meaning, constituents and functions; Money market instruments – call money, treasury bills, certificates of deposits, commercial bills, trade bills etc.; Recent trends in Indian money market; Capital market : primary and secondary markets; Depository system; Government securities market; Recent development in Indian capital market; Role of SEBI – an overview.
Unit-III
Reserve Bank of India: Organization, management and functions; Credit creation and credit control; Monetary Policy. Commercial Banks: Meaning, functions, management and investment policies, E-banking and E-trading; Present structure and recent developments in commercial banking.
Unit-IV
Development Banks: Concept, objectives and functions of development banks; Operational and promotional activities of development Banks; IFCI, ICICI, IDBI, IRBI, SIDBI, state development banks and state financial corporations.
Unit-V
Non-Banking Financial Institutions and Mutual Funds: Meaning & Functions of NBFIs, Concept, performance appraisal and regulation of mutual funds (with special reference of SEBI guidelines); Designing and marketing of mutual funds schemes; Latest mutual fund schemes in India – an overview.
Course Outcome:
The course seeks to enable the students to apply the knowledge gained relating to the various topics of financial market and institutions in corporate, government and other real situations.
Reference:
(Text Book)
1. Khan, M.Y. (2009). Indian Financial System. Tata McGraw Hill, Delhi. 2. Bhole, L M. (1982). Financial Markets and Institutions. Tata McGraw Hill, Delhi 3. Avdhani, (2017). Investment and Securities Markets in India, Himalaya Publications,
Delhi. 4. Pathak, Bharti (2014). Indian Financial System., Pearsons 5. P.N. Varshney (2017). Indian Financial System, Sultan Chand & Sons.
(References Book)
6. Goldsmith, Raymond W. (1 969). Financial Structure and Development. Yale University Press, New Haven.
7. Bascom, Wilbert 0. (1994). "The Economics of Financial Reform in Developing Countries". St. Martin's Press. Inc. New York.
MERCHANT BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES (MBA-223)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The course seeks to familiarize the students with the various concepts and aspects of traditional and emerging financial services. It would enable the students in understanding the various aspects of issue management namely issue pricing, preparation of prospectus, book building process, underwriting etc. The course would also enable the students in understanding the conceptual framework of various fee and fund based services namely leasing, hire purchase, credit rating, credit syndication, factoring etc.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks
Unit-I
Merchant Banking: Introduction – An Over view of Indian Financial System – Merchant Banking in India – Recent Developments and Challenges ahead – Institutional Structure – Functions of Merchant Banking – Legal and Regulatory Frameworks – Relevant Provisions of Companies Act- SERA – SEBI Guidelines – FEMA, etc. – Relation with Stock Exchanges, OTCEI and NSE.
Unit-II Issue Management: Role of Merchant Banker in Appraisal of Projects, Designing Capital Structure and Instruments – Issue Pricing – Pricing – Preparation of Prospectus, selection of Bankers, Advertising Consultants, etc. – Role of Registrations – underwriting Arrangements. Dealing with Bankers to the Issue, Underwriters, Registrars, and Brokers – Offer for Sale – Book – Building – Green Shoe Option – E-IPO, Private Placement – Bought out Deals – Placement with FIs, MGs, FIIs, etc., off – shore Issues – Issue Marketing – Advertising Strategies – NRI Marketing – Post Issue Activities. Unit-III Other Fee Based Management: Mergers and Acquisitions – Portfolio Management Services – Credit Syndication – Credit Rating – Mutual Funds – Business Valuation. Unit-IV Funds Based Financial Services: Leasing and Hire Purchasing – Basics of Leasing and Hire Purchasing – Financial Evaluation – Tax Implication.
Unit-V Other Fund Based Financial Services: Consumer Credit – Credit Cards – Real Estate Financing – Bills Discounting – Recent Developments in Factoring – Venture Capital.
Course Outcome:
The course seeks to enable the students to apply and use the insight and theoretical knowledge gained of the concepts and analytical aspects of financial services in corporate, government and real situations.
References:
(Text Book)
1. Khan, M. Y. (2005). Financial Services. Tata McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition. 2. Bhalla. V. K. (2009). Management of Financial Services. Anmol, New Delhi. 3. Machiraju (2002). Indian Financial System. Vikas Publishing House 2nd Edition. 4. Varshney P.N. & Mittal D.K. (2014). Indian Financial System. Sultan Chand and Sons,
New Delhi.
(Reference Book)
5. J.C. Varma, Credit Rating, Bharat Publishing House, New Delhi (latest edition). 6. Verma J.C. 1995, Corporate Mergers Amalgamations & Takeovers, Barat Publishing House, New
Delhi.
SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT (MBA-233)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The course seeks to develop the understanding about the various concepts and theories of security analysis and investment management. It would enable the students in acquiring the requisite skills required to manage the fund in competitive environment. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
UNIT - I
Introduction to Investment: Meaning of investment, Investment speculation and gambling. Investment objectives. Investment process, investment alternative, Impact of taxation on Investments Relationship between primary and secondary market. Function of primary market, Parties involved in new issues _ Managers, Registrars, underwriters. Bankers, statutory agencies. Private placement bought out deals. Book building. Function of stock exchanges. Share groups- group A,B and C. Settlement cycle. Carry forward system. Over the counter exchange of India (OITCEI). Listing of securities.
UNIT - II
Capital Markets: Over view of capital market, Capital market theory (CAPM). CAPM and the real world. Arbitrage pricing theory.Securities and Exchange Board of India - Origin, function, organization and activities. Dematerialization process and re-materialization process. National securities depository Ltd (NSDL) AND Central depository services Ltd. (CDSL). Stock market indices-BSE Sensex, NSE 50 (NIFTY). S& P CNX 500.
UNIT - III
Valuation of Securities: Valuation of Securities-The three steps process of valuation- economic analysis, industry analysis, and company analysis. General framework of valuation. Value- price relationship. Valuation of fixed income securities. Valuation of preference share and valuation of equity shares. Risk - Meaning, systematic-market risk, interest rate risk, purchasing power risk, unsystematic risk- Business risk, financial risk. Measurement of risk.
UNIT – IV
Efficient Market Theory: Fundamental Analysis- Economic analysis, industry analysis, company analysis. Earning of company, Growth in earnings. Technical analysis. Tools of technical analysis. Dow Theory, tread – primary intermediate and short term trends. Indicators – volume of trade, breadth of market, short sales. Odd lot trading. Moving average. Oscillators. Relative strength index (RSI). ROC, Charts- Point and figure charting, Bar charting, efficient market theory. Random walk theory, Weak from of EMH. Semi strong form and strong forms of EMH. Market inefficiencies.
UNIT - V
Portfolio Management: Traditional portfolio analysis. Effects of combing securities. Markowitz Risk- returns optimization. Risk and investor preference, calculation of risk and return for portfolio of securities, optimizing the portfolio. Sharpe simple portfolio optimization. Significance of ‘Beta’ in portfolio, traditional portfolio selection. Meaning of portfolio revision. Need of portfolio revision. Portfolio revision strategies. Portfolio revision practices. Constraints in portfolio revision.
Course Outcome:
The course seeks to enable the students to apply and use the various theories and principles of security analysis and fund management in corporate, industrial and real situations.
References:
(Text Book)
1.Fabozzi, Frank, Modigliani, Franco (2009). Capital Markets: Institutions and Instruments Prentice-Hall.
2. Sasidharan K (2011). Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. Tata McGraw-Hill. 3. Martin J. (2009). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. Wiley Publications. 4. V.K. Bhalla (2006). Investment Management. S. Chand and Company Ltd. 5. Punithavathy Pandian (2015). Security Analysis & Portfolio Management. Vikas Publishing
(Reference Book
6. Fischer Donald E& Jordan Ronald J. (1991). Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. Prentice-Hall.
7. Kevin S. (2006). Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. Prentice-Hall.
INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT (MBA-243)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1-0 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The course seeks to acquaint the students with the various concepts and principles of insurance relating to risk, uncertainty, typology, hedging tools and other financial aspects thereof. It seeks to develop the analytical skills for the risk management in the context of insurance.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
UNIT - I
Risk – Conceptual Framework-Meaning of risk, Risk versus Uncertainty. Risk distinguished from peril andhazards. Classification of Risk – Financial and Non-financial Risks & Static and Dynamic Risk. Scope of Riskmanagement, Process, Identification and Risk Control. Risk Retention and Transfer, Alternatives to buyingcommercial Insurance.
UNIT – II
Insurance – An Introduction-Meaning and significance of Insurance. Cost and Benefits of Insurance. Principles –Indemnity, Utmost good faith, Subrogation and Insurable Interest. Basic Principles of Insurance – utmost good faith,Insurable Interest, Indemnity, Corollaries of Indemnity, Proximate Cause.
UNIT – III
Classification of Insurance Business-Life and General Insurance Business, Personal and Commercial (Business)Insurances, Voluntary (Private) and Compulsory Insurance. Types of Life Insurance – Whole Life, Endowment,Assurance for children, Term Assurance, Participating and non-participating policies. Termination of Life Insurancepolicies – surrender, lapses and paid-up. Classification of General Insurance Business – Fire, Marine, Motor,Miscellaneous etc.
UNIT - IV
Insurance Devices-Probability theory and its usage in Insurance. Dual application of the law of Large Numbers.Pooling in Insurance – forms, cost, benefits and advantages.
UNIT - V
Financial Aspects of Insurance-Share Capital – Authorized, Issued & subscribed and Called-up & Paid-up.Reserves - General and Specialized. Solvency of an Insurance company.
Course Outcome:
The course seeks to enable the students to apply and use the theoretical knowledge gained of the various principles and concepts of insurance and risk management in corporate, industrial, government and other real situations.
References
(Text Book)
1. P S Palande (2013). Insurance in India. Sage Publications India. 2. Prava Nalini Tripathy and Prabir Pal (2005). Insurance Theory and Practice. PHI
Learning. 3. Ajay Kumar, D.P. Chatterjee, C. Chandrasekhar D.G. Patwardhan Ajay Kumar (2005).
Risk Management. Macmillan India. 4. Jadhav, Narendra (1994). Challenges to Indian Banking. Macmillan, New Delhi. 5. Tripathy, Nalini Prava (2006). Insurance Theory and Practice. PHI.
(Reference Book)
6. George, E. Rejda (2011). Principles of Risk Management and Insurance. (Publisher). 7. Dinsdale, W. A (1949). Elements of Insurance. Pitman. 8. Bakerwelford, A.W. and W.W. Otter Bany (1948). Law Relating to Fire-Insurance
Butterworth and Co. Ltd., London. 9. James S. Reichmann, Robert Hoyt (2012). Risk Management and Insurance. South-
Western and David Sommer College Pub. 10. Julia Holyoake (2002). Insurance. Chartered Institute of Bankers.
PROJECT FINANCE (MBA-253)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The course would enable the students in understanding the various aspects of project finance namely sources of financing, project appraisal, financial analysis, economic and social cost benefit analysis, risk analysis, infrastructure financing and other emerging topics of project finance.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction: Fundamental Topics: Project Management and corporate planning, Corporate financial objectives, Time Value of money, Interest rate and basics of cost of capital, Cost of capital.
Unit-II Concept Stage: Strategic Investment decisions and project ideas, Project feasibility study, Project financing. Unit-III Analysis Stage: Cost benefit analysis, financial analysis, Critical examination of evaluation techniques, Required Rate of return from projects, Economic and social cost benefit analysis, Project risk management, Project risk analysis, Project portfolio risk. Unit-IV Planning, Execution and Completion Stage: Allocation of limited capital, Network analysis and execution plan, Project execution and Control, Post completion audit. Unit-V Special Topics: Inflation and project investment, Economic life of projects and Replacement theory, Infrastructure projects, International Capital Budgeting.
Course Outcome:
The course seeks to enable the students to apply and use the theoretical knowledge gained of the various aspects of project financing and management in corporate, industrial, government and other real situations.
References
(Text Book)
1. B.M. Patel (2012). Project Management. VikasPublishing House, Delhi. 2. H.R. machiraju (2001). Introduction to project finance. Vikas Publishing House, Delhi. 3. Gopalan (2006). Project Management. Wiley India.
(Reference Book)
4. Burke (2009). Project Management. Wiley India.
INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATION (MBA 215) Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: This course will help a student in acquainting with marketing communication aspects. The students will be aware of the Concept of Creativity and will learn the art of copywriting. This will teach the implementation of advertisement making to practical life.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction to IMC: Advertising: Concepts, types and importance, Role of IMC in the marketing process; Legal, ethical and social aspects of advertising, Primary and selective demand, Theory of cognitive dissonance and clues for advertising strategist – Case studies
Unit-II
Facilitators of Promotion: Advertising Organization: selection, compensation and appraisal of an agency; Electronic media buying, Case studies
Unit-III
Media Planning: Conventional and Emerging Medias, Media plan development, Media scheduling, Evaluation of Media – Case studies.
Unit-IV
Budgeting and Evaluation: Budgeting of an advertising campaign; Evaluation: rationale of testing opinion and aptitude tests, measurement of advertising effectiveness – Case studies
Unit-V
Advertisement Programme and Public Relations: Campaign planning, Designing of an advertisement: copywriting, creative strategy; Campaign Building Program. Introduction to public relation, Publicity, Sales Promotion, Corporate advertising – case studies.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of the course the students will have the art of ad making for an analysed business product and situations they will understand that how highly paid and rewarding the career of advertising is. It will also acquaint them with an art of influencing more in fewer words. References:
(Text Books) 1. Belch, G. E., Belch, M. A., Kerr, G. F., & Powell, I. (2014). Advertising: An integrated
marketing communication perspective. McGraw-Hill Education. 2. Luxton, S., Reid, M., & Mavondo, F. (2015). Integrated marketing communication
capability and brand performance. Journal of Advertising, 44(1), 37-46. (Reference Books)
3. Bhupathi, M. M. (2016). Integrated Marketing Communications. In Strategic Marketing Management in Asia: Case Studies and Lessons across Industries (pp. 425-445). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
4. Scott, L. M. (2015). Integrated marketing communication in Chinese business-to-business markets: a case study (Doctoral dissertation).
5. Aaker, D. A. (1997). Myer. John G and Batra Rajeev, Advertising Management. 6. Thomas O'Guinn, Chris Allen, Richard Semenik (2014). Advertising and Integrated Brand
Promotion 7th edition, Cengage Learning, Stamford USA 7. Bovee, C. L. and Arens, W. F. (1992). Contemporary advertising. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT (MBA 225)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective: The prime objective is to teach the students the basics and fundamentals of selling in order to make the student adopt the habit of selling. This course will also make the students understand that distribution activity in itself is an entire industry and will teach them the power of distribution network.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Meaning and Functions: Nature, scope and objectives of sales management, theories of selling, functions of sales manager, selling operations– case studies.
Unit-II
Sales Force Management: Personal selling, salesmanship, sales forecasting, determination of size of sales force, sales organization: recruitment and conducting sales training programmes. Designing and administering compensation plan, motivating and supervising sales personnel, sales meetings and contests, direct marketing, sales display and sales promotion – case studies.
Unit-III
Sales Volume and Territory Management: Designing territories and allocating sales efforts, sales quota, sales evaluation programme, sales budgeting and control, International Sales management – case studies.
Unit-IV
Distribution Management: Distribution Channel Management- an introduction, Designing customer-oriented marketing channels, logistics management warehousing, transportation, inventory, communication, managing channel member behaviour – Case studies.
Unit-V
Managing Marketing Intermediaries: Introduction, Wholesaler, Intermediaries, Merchant Wholesalers, Sole Distributors, Supermarkets, Retail Outlets, Department Stores, Channel design – Case studies.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of the course the students will adapt the art of selling an ethical product in an competitive market. This will also give them the motivation to adapt selling as a rewarding career. They will learn the managerial skill of implementation of quota and territory designing techniques to real life. References:
(Text Books)
1. Gupta, S. L. (2009). Sales and Distribution Management. Excel Books India.. 2. Anderson, R. E., Hair, J. F., & Bush, A. J. (1988). Professional sales management. Vol. 2.
New York: McGraw-hill. 3. Cron, W. L., De Carlo, T. E., & Dalrymple, D. J. (2010). Sales management: concepts and
cases. John Wiley & Sons. (Reference Books)
4. Havaldar (2006). Sales & Distribution Mgmt - Text & Cases, Tata McGraw Hill 5. Robert Calvin (2007). Sales Management Demystified, McGraw Hill 6. Richard Ralph Still, Norman A. P. Govoni, Edward W. Cundiff (1994). Sales Management:
Decisions, Strategies, and Cases; Prentice-Hall 7. Sales, M. I. S. I. (2017). Sales & Distribution Management. 8. Agnihotri, R. (2018). Ramendra Singh: sales and distribution management: a practice-
based approach. 9. Rushton, A., Croucher, P., & Baker, P. (2014). The handbook of logistics and distribution
management: Understanding the supply chain. Kogan Page Publishers. 10. Lancaster, G., & Massingham, L. (2017). Sales management. In Essentials of Marketing
Management (pp. 243-269). Routledge.
PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT (MBA 235)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective:
Identify the critical information needed to develop a product and brand strategy that generates both quick-wins and long-term value.The course will provide insights into how profitable brand strategies can be created by building, measuring and managing brand equity.This course will provide appropriate theories, models and other tools on which to make better product and branding decisions.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Managing Product: Product planning and Management: Product Concepts and levels, product line and product mix decisions, product life cycle and marketing strategy implications. New Product Development Process: Developing product strategy, financial analysis of product management– case studies. Unit-II Managing Brand: Branding Strategies: Importance of branding, branding terminology, basic branding concepts- brand awareness, brand personality, brand image, brand identity, brand loyalty, brand equity, product versus corporate branding– case studies. Unit-III Major Branding Decisions: Major branding decisions: selecting a brand name, brand extension decision, family versus Individual brand names, multiple branding, private versus national branding, handling brand name changes – case studies. Unit-IV Branding Strategies: Brand positioning and re-launch: brand building and communication. Branding in specific sectors. Brand equity: sources & benefits, designing marketing programme to built brand equity, measurement of brand equity – case studies.
Unit-V Strategy to Implementation: Brand visioning, organization culture and brand, brand objective formulation, brand sphere auditing, implementing and recoursing brands, brand valuation – case studies. Course Outcome: As a result of studying this course, students will have better understanding of building and maintaining strong and powerful brands, one of the most valuable assets a company can have today. Through this course, students will have relevant skills and abilities needed to have competitive advantage within the corporate world. References:
(Text Books) 1. Keller, K. L., Parameswaran, M. G., and Jacob, I. (2011). Strategic brand management:
Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education India. 2. Verma, H. V. (2006). Brand management: Text and cases. Excel Books India.
(Reference Books)
3. Lehmann, D. R., & Winer, R. S. (1997). Product management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 4. Cowley, D. (Ed.). (1996). Understanding brands: by 10 people who do. Kogan Page
Limited.. 5. Czerniawski, R. D., & Maloney, M. W. (1999). Creating brand loyalty: the management
of power positioning and really great advertising. Amacom. 6. Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and
strategic thinking. Kogan page publishers.
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR (MBA 245)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The objective is to gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual concepts of buyer behavior and apply them to real life marketing situations and practices. This course will help students to become familiar with consumer behavior models of decision-making, taking a closer look at how consumers process information, develop preferences and make choices and how different marketing tactics are used by business/organizations to influence consumers. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Origin and Meaning of Consumer Behaviour- Process and Strategic applications of Consumer Behaviour, Consumer Research and Market Segmentation – case studies. Unit-II Consumer Adoption- Meaning and Definition, Process, Stages, Factors affecting consumer adoption, Role of behavioral intention in consumer adoption,Consumer Involvement, Personality and Consumer Behaviour, Consumer Perception and its formation, Consumer imagery- Case studies. Unit-III Consumer Attitude formation and Change, Changing Attitude, Consumer values, Communication and Consumer Behaviour– Case Studies. Reference groups influence on Consumers, Family influence, Influence of Culture and Social class on Consumer behaviour – Case Studies. Unit-IV Consumer Behaviour Models, Consumer decision making in the 21st Century, Diffusion of Innovation– Case Studies. Unit-V Consumerism, Analyzing Rural consumers behaviors in present day environment (through studies), Emerging Concepts in Consumer Behaviour – Case Studies. Course Outcome: At the end of the course, the student will have an understanding of the behavior of the buyer in the marketplace. The course will help the students take a holistic view of the buyer, which will help them with knowledge of various models and framework in understanding buyer’s behavior and align the knowledge with formulation of appropriate marketing strategies.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Schiffman, L. G., &Kanuk, L. L. (2012). Consumer behaviour. 2. Solomon, M. R., Dahl, D. W., White, K., Zaichkowsky, J. L., &Polegato, R
(Reference Books)
3. Assael, H. (2005). Consumer Behavior A Strategic Approach (2005 Indian. Dreamtech Press.
4. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., &Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior, 8th. New York: Dryder.
5. . (2014). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (Vol. 10). London: Pearson. 6. Foxall, G. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Brown, S. (1998). Consumer psychology for
marketing (Vol. 1). Cengage Learning EMEA. 7. Kazmi, S. H. H., &Batra, S. K. (2009). Consumer Behavior: Text & Cases. 8. Peter, J. P., Olson, J. C., &Grunert, K. G. (1999). Consumer behavior and marketing
strategy. 9. Wayne D. Hoyer (2012). Consumer Behaviour. Cengage Learning; 6 edition.
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-I (MBA 255)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: Marketing is constantly evolving. It can be hard to keep up with ongoing changes. With the help of this course student will learn latest marketing concept like Political Marketing, Rural Marketing and industrial marketing. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I Concepts and Components of Rural Markets, Classification of Rural Markets, Rural versus Urban Markets, Rural Marketing Environment, Rural Consumer Behavior – Characteristics of Rural Consumer, Researching Rural Market – Case studies. Unit-II Nature of Industrial Marketing- Meaning, Industrial v/s Consumer Marketing,Original Equipment Marketing, Understanding Industrial Markets- Types of Industrial customers, Classification of Industrial products and services, Marketing Implications for Industrial products and services, Industrial segmenting, Targeting and Positioning, analysis of Buyer Seller Relationships in Industrial markets – case studies. Unit-III Political marketing – Origin, Concept, Scope; Political marketing strategy, Political marketing consumers; Political branding –Political and democratic issues; Internal marketing, Campaign designing, Political marketing internationally, Role of Digital Marketing & social media in political marketing – Case studies Unit-IV Concept and Importance of International Marketing, Strategies for Domestic and International marketing, Factors influencing Export Marketing, Logistics in Export Marketing, Export Pricing Strategies, Exports Documentation and Procedure.
Unit-V Contemporary Marketing Modes- Content Marketing, Guerrilla Marketing, Word-to-mouth Marketing, Surrogate Marketing, Umbrella Marketing, Event Marketing, Ambush Marketing, Reverse Marketing- Case Studies.
Course Outcome: After completing this course the students will learn and understand different tools, techniques and methods in political, rural and industrial marketing
References:
(Text Books) 1. Pradeep, K., &Raut, S. (2006). The Rural Marketing Book. Biztantra (Dremtech Press),
New Delhi, 83. 2. T.P. Gopal Swamy (2009), Rural Marketing - Environment, Problems And Strategies, 3E,
Vikas Publishing House, Noida 3. Sanal Kumar Velayudhan (2007), Rural Marketing: Targeting the Non-urban Consumer,
Sage Publications
(Reference Books)
4. Lees-Marshment, J. (2009). Political marketing: principles and applications. Routledge. 5. Havaldar, K. K. (2005). Industrial Marketing: Text and Cases. Tata McGraw-Hill
Education. 6. Reeder, R. R., Brierty, E. G., & Reeder, B. H. (1991). Industrial marketing: Analysis,
planning, and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 7. Wright, R. (2004). Business-to-business marketing: a step-by-step guide. Pearson
Education. 8. Ellis, N. (2010). Business to business marketing: Relationships, networks and strategies.
Oxford University Press. 9. Richard Marvin Hill, Ralph Samuel Alexander, James Shorten Cross (1975) Industrial
marketing, R. D. Irwin 10. Frederick E. Webster (1995) Industrial Marketing Strategy, Wiley Publications.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (MBA 202) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The course will help to understand the nature of strategic management and its competitive and institutional context. It will also try to appreciate the strengths and limitations of strategic analysis, and how it fits into the overall strategy process. Further it will help to master a range of methods and techniques of strategic analysis and have a clear appreciation of their theoretical and empirical foundations, range of applicability, qualifications and limitations.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I INTRODUCTION Strategic management – concept as a field of study- views of different schools of thought on strategy – Strategic Management Process – Mission and Objectives – Linking Strategic Management with Ethics and Social Responsibility.
Unit-II EXTERNAL ANALYSIS AND COMPETITIVE ANLYSIS Environmental factors – Global Environment for MNCs – Industry Analysis: Porter’s Five Forces Model – Assessment of Organization’s Resources and Capabilities – Internal Resources and Capabilities – Core Competencies – Value Chain Analysis – SWOT Analysis. Unit-III STRATEGIC OPTIONS, ANALYSIS AND CHOICE Alternative Grand Strategies: Stability, Growth, Retrenchment, Combination – Outsourcing Strategies – Mergers Acquisitions – Strategic Alliance – Strategy and Competitive Advantage. Process of Strategic Choice – Different tools and Techniques in Strategy Formulation- Role of Board of Directors : Corporate Governance. Unit-IV STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION Important Issues in Implementation – Resource Allocation ,Leadership Implementation – Structural Consideration : Structure and Strategy, Organizational Design. Functional Strategies: Marketing, Human Resource, Production, R&D, Technology, Finance/Accounts. Strategy Evaluation Framework – Criteria for Strategy Evaluation – Measuring and Monitoring Performance : The Balanced Scorecard and other approaches.
Unit-V CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Managing Technology and Innovation – Entrepreneurial Ventures and Small Business Strategic issues for Non-Profit Organizations.
Course Outcome:
On successful completion of this course, students will be able to identify and demonstrate the key components of the strategic management process and how it can be applied in organizations in order to increase value propositions for all the organization’s stakeholders. The students will effectively communicate the change management strategies in various forums to an array of audiences with accuracy, clarity, specificity and professionalism. References:
(Text Books)
1. Thompson, Strickland, Gamble & Jain. (2005). Crafting and Executing Strategy. 14th Edition. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publication
2. Azhar, K. (2008). Business Policy and Strategic Management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publication.
3. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (2003). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School.
(Reference Books)
4. Hunger, D. J., & Wheelen, T. L. (2008). Concepts in strategic management and business policy..
5. Jauch, L. R., & Glueck, W. F. (1988). Business policy and strategic management (5th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
6. Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2000). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.’
7. Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster.
8. Gupta, V., Gollakota, K., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Business policy and strategic management: Concepts and applications. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
DIGITAL MARKETING & E-COMMERCE (MBA 204) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
This course will update the knowledge of concept of advertising on new age medium and make them aware of basic fundamentals of E-commerce industry. This course will acquaint them with knowledge of fundamental rules for advertising on the digital platform. This will also provide knowledge for designing a marketing campaign for social media platforms and how is it different from traditional media.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I E-COMMERCE TECHNOLOGY
E-Commerce – Concept, Framework, Classifications; Data Warehousing – Data Storage & Processing, OALP & Data mining; Networking Infrastructure – IP, TCP HTTP, HTML– Cryptography – Case studies.
Unit-II DIGITAL MARKETING & CONCEPTS
Digital Marketing – Concept, Need in 21st Century, Planning; Related concepts–Email Marketing, Mobile Marketing, Social Media engagement, Search Engine Optimization, Online Public Relation – Case studies.
Unit-III DIGITAL MARKETING MANAGMENT
E-Tailing, E-Supply Chain Management, Electronic Payment System, E-Auctions– Case Studies.
Unit-IV E-COMMERCE IMPACT
E-Commerce Impact on – Job Market, Growth, Trade, International Co-operation; Application of E- commerce in different sectors – service, industry, domestic; Multidisciplinary approach to E- commerce–Case studies.
Unit-V LEGAL ISSUES
Laws–Intellectual property law, Copyrights, Trademark, Patents, Contract law for E-commerce, Warranties and New Products, Cyber law issues–Privacy and Trans-border flows, Frauds; E-Security–Case Studies.
Course Outcome:
On completion of this course the students will have the understanding of the facts for advertising on digital media and different aspects and approaches of various digital media vehicles and social media platforms. The future of business in digital world and the eminence presence of it which is growing rapidly and they will be able to match up to the speed.
References: (Text Books)
1. Efraim, T., Jae, L., David, K., & Michael, C. H. (2002). Electronic Commerce: a managerial perspective. Electronic Payment, 13.
(Reference Books)
2. Ryan, D. (2014). Understanding digital marketing: Marketing strategies for engaging the digital generation. Kogan Page Publishers.
3. Kalakota & Winston – “Frontiers of Electronic Commerce”, Addison Wesley, 2001. 4. Greenstein, M., & Feinman, T. M. (1999). Electronic commerce: security risk management
and control. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 5. Trepper, C. (2000). ECommerce Strategies. Microsoft Press. 6. David Whiteley, E-Commerce: Strategy Technologies, and Application, Tata McGraw
Hill.
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: STRATEGIES AND SYSTEMS (MBA-212)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The course objective is to extend a planned understanding of the function of HRD in modern business organisations, with prominence on the association between HRD, the on the whole company objectives and its incorporation with other strategic human resource management strategies and practices.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
HRD Introduction- Concept, goals, challenges, HRD methods, Changing paradigm of HRD- Concepts-Scope-Objectives, Principles, Framework, HRD Climate, Global perspectives on HRD
Unit-II
HRD Sub-Systems- Performance Management, Potential Appraisal & Development Training & Development, Coaching & Mentoring, Potential Appraisal, Competency Mapping &Development, Career Planning& Development, Succession Planning; Contribution of sub-systems to HRD goals.
Unit-III
Planning and Organizing HRD System- Principles in Designing HRD system, Challenges of future HRD professionals- Roles and competency requirements of HRD professionals.
Unit-IV
Developing HRD Strategies: Approaches: Strategic HR Framework Approach, Integrative framework, Human Capital Appraisal Approach, HRD Score card approach, PCMM Approach.
Unit-V
HRD for Special Groups: HRD for Workers, HRD for other special groups; HRD Interventions Strategies; HRD Approaches for coping with Organizational Changes, Future of HRD in India
Course Outcome:
The outcomes of the course will give understanding and professional competence in the areas like understanding for facts of the assumption and practice of HR, knowledge and skills to significantly appraise existing paradigms and practice in HRD in the course of examining current HRD programmes and their theoretical underpinnings, the importance of HRD in its input to the improvement of organisations and workforce and the role of HRD as a collection of technologies for protecting organisational change in today’s business climate;
References:
(Text Books)
1. Rao, V.S.P. (2010). Human Resources Management. Excel Books. New Delhi. 2. Aswathappa, K. (2013). Human Resource Management: Text and Cases, 7/e; New Delhi,
McGraw-Hill
(Reference Books)
3. Rao, T.V. (2008). HRD Audit - Evaluating the Human Resource Function for Business Improvement, 1/e; New Delhi: Response Books
4. Kandula, R Srinivas (2006). Strategic Human Resource Development, 1/e; New Delhi: PHI Learning.
5. Mankin, David (2012). Human Resource Development, Oxford University Press, 6. Haldar, Udai(2010) Human Resource Development, Oxford University Press.. 7. Dayal, Ishwar (1996). Successful Application of HRD, New concepts, New Delhi.. 8. Dayal Ishwar (1993). Designing HRD Systems, Concept, New Delhi, 9. Gupta Santosh & Deep Sachin Gupta (2008). Human Resource Development, 2ndEd. Deep
and Deep Publications. 10. Kohli, Uddesh and Sinha, Dharni P.(1995). HRD - Global Challanges & Strategies in 2000,
AD ISTD, New Delhi.. 11. Krishnaveni, R. (2008). Human Resource Development: A Researcher’s Perspective,
Excel books, 12. Kaushal H. (2010). Case Studies in Human Resource Development, McMillan India. 13. Maheshwari, B. L. and Sinha Dharni P. (1991.) Management of Change through HRD,
TATA McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 14. Rao, T.V. (1988). Alternative Approaches & Strategies of Human Resource Development.
Rawat, Jaipur, 15. Silver, DN (1991). HRD: The Indian Experience. India, New Delhi, 16. Udai Pareek and Rao T.V. (2012). Designing and Managing Human Resource Systems,
3/e; New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (MBA- 222)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessional: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
Industrial Relations play an important role in organizations. Organisational efficiency and performance are intricately interlinked with industrial relations. This course will expose students to the conceptual and practical aspects of industrial relations, industrial conflicts and disputes, grievance handling, trade union and worker’s education.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction to Industrial Relation-Concept, Evolution, Characteristics, Scope, Components, Factors Affecting Industrial Relations, Approaches to IR, IR in India, Prerequisites of successful industrial relation programme. Emerging issues in IR: Industrial Relation and Technological Change. Major Incidents of Industrial unrest in India. Main Recommendations of the Second National Labour Commission, International Labour Organization (ILO) and Industrial Relations, The Future Direction of Industrial Relations.
Unit-II
Industrial Conflicts/Disputes- Meaning, essentials, classification, recognition of disputes, impact of industrial disputes, factors of industrial disputes/conflicts, Forms of disputes: Strikes and Lock-outs , Right to strike and lock-out, Prevention of strikes and lock-Outs, Gheraos.
Unit-III
Negotiation and collective bargaining- Preventive machinery-Grievances handling, Meaning, Nature, Causes of Grievances, procedure for Redressal. Collective bargaining-meaning, principles, contents, forms, process and levels of collective bargaining, formats of agreements, Typologies, productivity bargaining, pre-requisite of effective collective bargaining, collective bargaining in India. Standing orders. Code of discipline Settlement Machinery-Mediation , Conciliation, Arbitration, Adjudication.
Unit-IV
Trade Union- Concept, Purpose, Functions, Types, Trade Union and politics, Problems of Trade Unions in India, NCL’s recommendations for Trade unions. Major Central trade unions in India, Employers’ Organizations, Recent Trends in Trade Union Movement in India.
Unit-V
Workers’ Participation in Management- concept, determinants, form and levels of participation, schemes of workers’ participation in management in India. Workers’ Education-content, significance, rationale behind workers’ education, workers’ education scheme in India- objectives, functions and problems.
Course Outcome:
After the completion of this course, the students will be familiar with concept, evaluation and scope of Industrial relation. The students will be able to get knowledge about collective bargaining, settlement machinery and ways of grievance handling as well as industrial peace. They will know about recent trends in trade union movement in India and workers’ participation in management also.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Mamoria, Mamoria and Gawker, (2009), Dynamics of Industrial Relations, 16th Revised Edition, Himalaya Publishing House.
2. Sharma, R. C. (2016), Industrial Relational and Labour Legislation, Prentice Hall of India
(Reference Books)
3. C. S. Venkataratnam, (2009), Industrial Relations, Oxford University Press. 4. Sinha, P.R.N. et. Al. (2009), Industrial Relations, Trade Unions, and Labour Legislation,
Pearson Education. 5. Blyton, P. & Turnbull, P. (2004), The Dynamics of Employee Relations, Palgrave
Macmillan. 6. Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2003), Understanding Work & Employment: Industrial
Relations in Transition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 7. Padhi, P.K. (2010), Labor and Industrial Laws, Prentice Hall of India. 8. Singh, B.D. (2009), Industrial Relations: Emerging Paradigms, Excel Books. 9. Sen, R., (2009), Industrial Relations: Text and Cases, Macmillan India. 10. Sen, Ratna (2010), Industrial Relations in India, Macmillan publishers. 11. B. D. Singh, (2008), Industrial Relations, Excel Publications.
INTERPERSONAL AND GROUP DYNAMICS (MBA-232)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
The purpose of this course is to advance understanding regarding interpersonal and group processes, socialization and group decision making. It will also help the student to examine source of conflict in groups and conflict resolution.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Group- Concept, Nature and Classification of groups. Team–Concept, Types, Team Effectiveness, Team Building. Difference between Group and Team.Group dynamics– Meaning, Homan’s model, Measurement in Group dynamics; Group formation.
Unit-II
Interpersonal Behavior and Influence Processes- Interpersonal Awareness and Feedback process including Johari Window, Life Script Analysis, Transactional Analysis and 360 Degree Feedback. Interpersonal trust: CBT, IBT, violation of trust, Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO-B), Career Roles &Identity. Self Awareness-GROW, DOTS & Holland Models. Behavioural modification Models. Emotions: Emotional Labour, Emotional Baggage, Emotional Quotient and Emotional Intelligence.
Unit-III
Learning social behavior- Social learning theories, Group development, Models of group development: Tuckman model, Fisher’s Theory, Tubbs’ systems Model, Wheelan model – Group socialization; Group Structure, Group Norms, Group Roles, Group Authority, Group Attraction, Group communication networks, Group Cohesiveness, Group Conformity, Group Obedience, Group Synergy, Group Interdependence, group Interaction.
Unit-IV
Group Decision Making- Meaning, Benefits, Techniques of group decision-making. Groupthink, Group Polarization.
Unit-V
Group Conflict-Sources of Conflict in Groups, Conflict process, Coalitions, conflict resolution; Power and Politics – Power Tactics, Power in Groups. Groups and Change-The Group as an agent of change, Sources of change in groups.
Course Outcome:
The course will enable the students to have the conceptual as well a practical knowledge of group dynamics. This paper will help the students to improve their interpersonal behaviour and help them to practice the techniques of group decision-making. Students will know how to develop a group, group socialization process and issue related to group conflict.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Robbins, Stephen, Judge and Vohra (2012), Organizational Behavior, 14th Edition, Pearson Publication.
2. V S P Rao, (2010), Organisational Behaviour, Himalaya Publishing House
(Reference Books)
3. Donelson Forsyth (2009), Group Dynamics, Cengage Education. 4. Laurie J. Mullins (2011) Essentials of Organizational Behaviour, Pearson Learning 5. Udai Pareek (2012) Understanding Organisational Behaviour, Oxford University Press, 6. Kieth Davis &John Newstrom (2010) Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work,
Tata McGraw Hill 7. Kalliath, Brough, Manimala, (2009) Organisational Behaviour, Tata McGraw Hill 8. Bennis, W.G (1979) Essay in Interpersonal Dynamics, U.S.A., Dorsey Press, 9. Davis, Keith (2002) Organizational Behaviour, 11th Edition, McGraw /Irwin, 10. Greenberg, (2010), Behavior in Organizations, 10th Edition, Pearson Edition 11. Luthans, Fred, (2008) Organizational Behaviour, 12th Edition, Long learning education
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT (MBA-242)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective:
This course would enable the students to understand new developments as well as established approaches to compensation decisions. Students will explore the theory, concepts, and methods used to design compensation and benefits systems in a way that contributes to achieve the goals of the organization.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit-I
Introduction: Compensation: concept, definition and objectives of compensation, Forms of pay: Base, incentives and benefits. Determination of inter and intra-industry compensation differentials, internal and external equity in compensation systems.
Unit-II
Determining the Structure: Internal Alignment: Structures vary among organizations, Factors shaping internal structures, Strategic choices in designing internal structures.
Unit-III
Determining Pay Level: Labour market forces: demand side , supply side, organization factors, relevant markets, competitive pay policy alternatives, Designing pay levels, mix and pay structures: competitive pay policy, purpose of the survey, select relevant market competitors, design and interpret the survey.
Unit- IV
Determining Individual Pay: Employee contributions: pay-for-performance plans: short term, team incentives, long term plans.
Unit- V
Employee Benefits: Benefit determination process, Statutory benefits including health care, employee welfare and retirement benefits, Compensation of special groups, Trade union role in wage and salary administration. Issues in Compensation Management: International pay systems, Government and legal issues: Wage boards and Pay commissions, Public sector pay, other issues:
Managing Labour cost, Embedded controls, Control salary levels. Innovations in the area of compensation management in Indian and MNCs operating in India and abroad.
Course Outcome:
At the end of the course the students will be able to demonstrate knowledge in various components of total compensation, the methods and aims of different forms of payment systems. Students will develop an understanding of the issues in designing the reward systems and establishing different pay rates . They will come to know about the employers’ obligations under labor statutes governing wage and salary administration. Learn some of the implications for strategic compensation and possible employer approaches to managing legally required benefits.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Milkovich , Newman and Venkata Ratnam (2017). Compensation’, ninth edition, McGraw-Hill Education India Pvt. ltd
2. Armstrong, Michel and Murlis, Helen (2010). Reward Management. Kogan Page. 3. Henderson, Richard I. (2004). Compensation Management: Rewarding Performance
Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd,
(Reference Books)
4. Joseph. J. Martocchio (2004). Strategic Compensation- A Human Resource Management Approach, Prentice-Hall.
5. Milkovich and Newman (2005). Compensation: Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, Eighth Edition.
6. Singh, B.D. (2007). Compensation and Reward Management. Excel Books, 7. Gerhart, B. and Rynes, S.L. (2008). Compensation, Evidence, and Strategic Implications.
Sage Publication, 8. Berger and Berger. (2008). The Compensation Handbook: A State-of –the –Art Guide to
Compensation Strategy and Design. McGraw Hill Education.
CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT (MBA-252)
Total: 100 Theory: 50
L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5)
Course Objective:
This course will facilitate the students to comprehend the complexities of managing human resources in an international context. At the end of the course students would be able to give explanation the significance and application of international HRM practices that assists global companies to increase competitive improvement.
Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I
Introduction-The genesis and concepts of culture, Dimensions and determinants of organizational Culture, Importance of cross cultural management in globalized business environment.
Unit-II
Various Scientific Approaches to the Cross Cultural Issue-Theory of Hall, Trompenaars, Geert Hofstede and John Mole. Mapping cross-cultural differences within and across nations.
Unit-III
Implications of Cross-Cultural Management- in Globalization, Diversity, culture shock, Technology, Organizational change, mergers and acquisitions and Quality management system (BPR, TQM, Lean and Six Sigma.).
Unit-IV
Training of the specific skills– Cross cultural decision making, staffing, Expatriation and Repatriation; Communication and cooperation in an international team, Managing culturally appropriate leadership style, Designing result oriented motivational tools , Intercultural negotiation and conflicts management.
Unit-V
Ethical Issues and Values in Cross Cultural Management- Cultural clustering of individual countries, Case Studies.
Course Outcome:
By the end of the courses students will: identify and analyze human resource concerns for making successful results in the contemporary business situation and will be able to think tactically and recognize the fundamentals of business and organizations in order to administer change more efficiently in the global business environment. They will be able to make learn the relevant core features of human resource management in an worldwide context and will also be able to expand capability to outline explanations to multifaceted business problems.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Dhar, R.L.(2008),Strategic Human resource management, excel book publication, new Delhi.
2. Peter J. Dowling, Denice E. Welch & Randall S. Schuler (2009) International Human Resource Management. Managing People in a Multinational Context, South-Western College Publications, 3.ed.
3. Dowling, Peter J., Marion Festing, and Allen D. Engle (2013). International Human Resource Management, 6/e; New Delhi: Cengage Learning
(Reference Books)
4. Aswathappa, K. and Sadhana Dash (2013). International Human Resource Management, 2/e; New Delhi: McGraw-Hill
5. Edwards, Tony and Chris Rees (2013). International Human Resource Management, 1/e; New Delhi: Pearson
6. Sharma, A. & Khandekar, A.(2010), Strategic human resource management, Response books, New Delhi.
7. Rao, V.S.P. (2010), Human resource management,Excel books, New Delhi. 8. Mark Mendenhall & Gary Oddou: Readings and Cases in International Human Resource
Management, South-Western College Publications, 3.ed, 1999. 9. Dowling, Peter J., Marion Festing, and Allen D. Engle (2013). International Human
Resource Management, 6/e; New Delhi: Cengage Learning.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (MBA-214)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3hrs Course Objective: The objective of the paper is to give students an overall view of the international financial system and how multinational corporations operate. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. UNIT – I Overview of Global Market and Risk: Environment of International Financial Management, functions of international financial management, International monetary system. Foreign exchange markets, exchange rates, exchange rate theories – Interest parity, Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), interest rate and inflation rate Fischer Effect, Balance of Payments theory, Stable and flexible exchange rate, International fisher effect. Overview of Forward contracts, currency futures and currency options. Currency swaps and interest rate swaps. UNIT - II Exposure and Risk Management: Concept of exposure and risk. Types of exposure – transaction, transnational and economic exposure. Measurement of transaction exposure. Managing transaction exposure. Hedging Strategies. Benefits of international equity and bond investing. International capital asset pricing model (ICAPM), The national FDI policy framework. UNIT – III International Capital Budgeting: Basic framework for analysis, Issues and strategic in international capital budgeting, The adjusted present value approach (APV). Financial risk and cost of capital, Exchange risk and cost of capital, Political risk and cost of capital, Impact of hedging on cost of capital. Tax consideration – Branch vs. subsidiary, withholding tax, Foreign sales corporations, Benefits for Holding-Subsidiary in tax havens. UNIT – IV International Working Capital Management: International cash management: The cash positioning decision, Advantages and disadvantages of centralized cash management, Multilateral netting, Intra corporate transfer of funds, Transfer pricing, problems of international cash management. International Receivables management: Domestic v/s International receivables management, Letter of credit, International factoring & Accounts receivables. International inventory management: Advance inventory purchases, Stockpiling.
UNIT – V International Financing Decisions: Euro-money and Euro bond Markets. Size of the Euro currency market, Growth of Euro Dollar market, Instruments and rate of Euro Currency Markets, Creation of Euro deposits, Syndicated Euro currency loan Market. International Bond Markets, Multi-currency bonds and their types. Rationale for multi currency bonds. International Equity markets: Foreign equity market and their comparative performance. Recent developments and innovations in international capital markets. Recent developments in the Euro bond market. Course Outcome: By the end of the course, the students should be able to understand international capital and foreign exchange market, identify risk relating to exchange rate fluctuations and develop strategies to deal with them, identify and appraise investment opportunities in the international environment, develop strategies to deal with other types of country risks associated with foreign operations and express well considered opinion on issues relating to international financial management. References: (Text Book)
1. P.G. Apte (1995) Global Financial Management, Tata McGraw-Hill Education. 2. Sharan (2011) International Financial Management, Prentice-Hall.
(Reference Book)
3. Zenoff David B. & Zwick Jack (1969) International Financial Management, Prentice-Hall. 4. Click & Coval (2002) Theory and Practice of International Financial Management,
Prentice-Hall. 5. Alan C. Shapiro (2004) Foundations of Multinational Financial Management, Wiley. 6. Maurice D. Levi (2005) International Finance, Taylor & Francis.
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (MBA – 224)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3hrs Course Objective: The objective of the course is to acquaint the students with the importance of the working capital and the techniques used for effective working capital management. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Conceptual Framework- Tradeoff between liquidity and profitability, Operating Environment of Working Capital, Determinants of working capital, Determination of Working Capital, Theories and Approach. Unit-II Receivable Management- Determining the Appropriate receivable Policy, Marginal Analysis, Credit Analysis and Decision, Heuristic Approach, Discriminant Analysis, Sequential Decision Analysis. Inventory Management Kinds of Inventories, Benefits and Costs of Holding Inventories, Inventory management and Valuation, Inventory Control Models. Unit-III Management of Cash- Motives for Holding Cash and marketable securities; Cash System Managing the Cash Flows, Types Collection Systems, Cash Concentration Strategies Disbursement Tools, Investment in marketable Securities, Forecasting Cash Flows; Managing Corporate Liquidity and Financial Flexibility; Measures of Liquidity, Determining the Optimum Level of Cash Balances – Baumol Mode, Beranek Model, Miller-Orr Model, Stone Model Unit-IV Bank Credit- Basic Principles and Practices, Bank Credit – Methods of Assessment and Appraisal, Other Sources of Short Term Finance Unit-V Payables Management, Short-Term International Financial Transactions, Integrating Working Capital and Capital Investment Process, Emerging Trends in Working Capital Course Outcome: By the end of the course, the students should be able to evaluate comparative working capital management policies and their impact on the firm's profitability, liquidity, risk and operating flexibility, evaluate the importance of effective working capital management and its role in
meeting the firm's strategic objectives and its impact in value creation, investigate funds flow cycles and their impact on working capital management objectives, apply corporate cash management, accounts receivable management, bank relations, and inventory management techniques to maximize the share holders' value and write a plan for a balanced integration of cash, credit and other short-term funding and policies. References:
(Text Book)
1. Khan, M.Y. (2007) Financial Management TMH, New Delhi. 2. Bhalla, V.K. (2014) Working Capital Management Text and Cases. 3. Bhattacharya, Hrishikesh (2014) Working Capital Management PHI, New Delhi.
(Reference Book)
4. Hampton, J. J. and C. L. Wagner (1989) Working Capital Management 5. Scherer, F. C. (1989) Modern Working Capital.
DERIVATIVES MANAGEMENT (MBA-234)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3Hours Course Objective: To provide a comprehensive understanding of derivatives and introduce the analytics of derivative valuation and application of derivatives in formulating simple corporate financial management strategies. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction: Derivatives –Definition -Types – Forward Contracts – Futures Contracts – Options - Swaps – Differences between Cash and Future Markets – Types of Traders – OTC and Exchange Traded Securities – Types of Settlement – Uses and Advantages of Derivatives – Risk in Derivatives – Cases. Unit-II Futures Contract: Specifications of Futures Contract – Margin Requirements – Marking to Market – Hedging using Futures – Types of Futures Contracts – Securities, Stock Index Futures, Currencies and Commodities – Delivery Options – Relationship between Futures Prices, Forward Prices and Future Spot Prices. Unit-III Options: Definition – Exchange Traded Options, OTC Options – Specifications of Options – Call and Put Options - American and European Options – Intrinsic Value and Time Value of Options – Option payoff options on Securities, Stock Indices, Currencies and Futures –Options pricing models – Differences between future and Options contracts. Unit-IV SWAPS: Definition of SWAP – Interest Rate SWAP – Currency SWAP –Role of Financial Intermediary – Warehousing – Valuation of Interest rate SWAPs and Currency SWAPS Bonds and FRNs –Credit Risk. Unit –V Derivatives in India: Evolution of Derivatives Market in India – Regulations –Framework – Exchange Trading in Derivatives – Commodity Futures – Contract Terminology and Specifications for Stock Futures and Index futures in NSE- Contract Terminology and Specifications for Interest Rate Derivatives.
Course Outcome: Upon completion of this course, students should be able to understand the structural differences among derivative instruments, understand how derivatives are traded in exchanges and/or OTC markets, price derivative securities with different pricing models and use Derivatives for hedging and/or speculation purposes. References: (Text Book)
1. Bhaskar, P.(2003) Derivatives Simplified, Sage Publishing 2. Gupta S.L. (2017) Financial Derivatives, PHI, New Delhi.
(Reference Book) 3. John. C. Hull (2016) Options, Futures and other Derivative Securities, PHI, New Delhi. 4. Keith, Redhead (1997) Financial Derivatives, PHI, New Delhi. 5. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, Marc Potters (2011). Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative
Pricing, Cambridge University Press
MICROFINANCE (MBA – 244)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3 hrs Course Objective: The objective of the course is to acquaint the students with the importance of the microfinance models and policies thereof with special references to India. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Overview of Microfinance and its Evolution-Genesis and evolution of microfinance: Definition of micro finance - Products and Services: Lending and Saving Products. Unit-II Micro finance different models in India and International context- SHG Bank Linkage, Grameen model, Banking correspondent and facilitator model, Major opportunities and challenges of Indian microfinance sector. Unit-III Major policy initiatives taken by government in the area of social banking- Evolution of concept of priority sector, regional rural banks, nationalization of commercial banks, subsidy based credit facility, setting of NABARD, Introduction of Lead Bank scheme. Unit-IV Measuring micro finance performance and impact assessment, managing the viability Legal and regulatory issues in micro finance sector in India. Unit – V Operational Aspects of Micro-Finance-Commercial Banks as Micro lenders, The Technological Base:Payment Systems and Banking Software, Building the Market for Investing in Microfinance, Operating Costs, Risk Management Course Outcome: The students would be able to apply the knowledge about various models, practices and policies of micro-finance for the effective management of micro finance institutions
References: (Text Book)
1. Debadutta K. Panda (2009) Understanding Microfinance Wiley India 2. Girija Srinivasan (2013) Microfinance India Sage India 3. Micro-Finance Perspectives and Operations: Indian Institute of Finance (2008) Macmillan
India (Reference Book)
4. Aghion, Jonathan Morduch (2005) The Economics of Microfinance MIT Press
COMMERCIAL BANK MANAGEMENT (MBA - 254)
Total: 100 L-T Theory: 50 3-1 Sessionals: 50 (3.5 Credits) Time: 3 Hours Course Objective: This course aims at enabling the students to understand and to contribute to the strategic operational policies and practices of commercial bank management in a competitive environment. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I
Indian Banking System: Evolution of Commercial banking in India, Banking Structure in India, Appraisal of present Banking system, Banking Sector reforms, emerging trends, issues and challenges in Banking System. Unit-II
Bank Balance Sheet Structure: Accounts - Categories, Analysis, Prudential Norms, Capital adequacy, Cost of funds, RBI guidelines for implementation of Basel III Capital Regulations in India. Unit-III Credit Management: Credit Appraisal - Assessment of Credit Requirements, Credit Rating, and Pricing of Loans. Loan Delivery and Monitoring of Accounts, Management of Guarantees and other Fee based business. Unit- IV Management of NPAs: Prudential norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning pertaining to Advances. Legal and Non-legal Measures, Credit Risk Models and Credit Derivatives. Unit- V Investment Management in Banks: Management of SLR and non-SLR securities, Asset-Liability Management, Risk Management in Banks.
Course Outcome: As a result of taking this course, the student should be able to critically evaluate the role of banking in the economy, their structure, and the regulatory environment in which they operate. They will also able to discuss the analytical foundations related to the asset-liability management (ALM) of financial institutions, the risks involved, and the impact on the valuation of financial institutions. After that they will able to analyze and evaluate the management of the lending, investment and trading activities of financial institutions, the related risks and the management of these risks. Finally they will able to understand the role and the risks of off-balance sheet activities.
References:
(Text Book)
1. M.L.Tanan, (2008) Banking Law and Practice Wadhwa & Company, Nagpur C.R. Data & S.K. Kataria
2. Advanced Bank Management (2010) Indian Institute of Banking & Finance - Macmillan Publication
3. Bank Financial Management (2010) Indian Institute of Banking & Finance - Macmillan Publication
(Reference Book) 4. Timothy W. Koch (2009) Bank Management, South Western Publication.
RETAIL MANAGEMENT (MBA 216)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The main objective is to make students learn the basics and fundamentals of retailing concept in India. To acquaint the students with the art of designing a retail outlet and teach them the concept of supply chain and logistics in retailing. It’ll teach the implementation distribution planning and cross docking strategy in retailing, It will provide the basic understanding of the new technology like RFID and Big data used in retailing. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction to Retail: Retailing definition, structure, different formats, marketing concepts in retailing consumer purchase behavior, cultural and social group influence – Case Studies. Unit-II Key Marketing Factors in Retailing: Retailing Mix- Social forces, economic forces, technological forces, competitive forces, Theories in retailing management – Case Studies.
Unit-III Retail Location: Retail store location- store site selection, site selection models, return on per square feet of space; Exteriors and layout- creativity display; Merchandise Planning- stocks turns, credit management, Retail pricing – Case Studies.
Unit-IV Retail Promotions: Staying ahead of competition, Supply chain management, Warehousing, Franchising, Direct marketing/ Direct selling – Case Studies.
Unit-V Major Retailing Decisions: Emerging formats- issues & options, Retail equity, Technology in retailing, Retailing through the Internet, HRM in retailing, International retailing – Case Studies. Course Outcome: On course completion the student will have an understanding of the operations of retail outlets. They will be aware of career opportunities in retailing and will understand that how the term creativity in retailing is used for sales.
References: (Text Books)
1. Berman, B., Evans, J. R., & Mathur, M. (2011). Retail management: a strategic approach 11/e Pearson Education
2. Swapna, P. (2013). Retail management. McGraw hill publication. 3. Levy, M., & Barton, A. Weitz (2007). Retailing Management 6/e, Tata McGraw Hill 4. Newman, Andrew, and Peter Cullen (2002) Retailing: environment & operations. Cengage
Learning EMEA.
(Reference Books)
5. Gilbert, D. (1999). Retail marketing management 2/e. Pearson Education. 6. Gibson G. Vedamani (2003). Retail Management: Functional Principles and Practices (4th
Edition), JAICO Publishing House 7. Fernie, J., & Sparks, L. (2014). Logistics and retail management: emerging issues and new
challenges in the retail supply chain. Kogan page publishers. 8. Varley, R., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Principles of retailing. Palgrave macmillan. 9. Paul, R., & Ponnam, A. (2018). Teaching Customer Experience Quality and its
Significance in Retail Management: A Role Playing Game using Chinese Puzzle ‘Tangram’. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(2), 126-139.
10. Sengupta, A. (2008). Emergence of modern Indian retail: an historical perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(9), 689-700.
11. Padmavathy, C., Balaji, M. S., & Sivakumar, V. J. (2012). Measuring effectiveness of customer relationship management in Indian retail banks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 246-266.
RELATIONSHIP MARKETING (MBA 226)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L–T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The course aims to develop a clear understanding of customer relationship management concepts and frameworks. This will also help the students by touching upon the areas of relationship marketing, customer behavior, customer satisfaction and loyalty. It will provide a rigorous understanding in learning effective CRM strategies used by companies to align business process with customer centric strategies using people, technology, and knowledge. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Conceptual foundation of Relationship Marketing- Nordic school approach, Six markets model, Relationship marketing versus Transactional marketing, Customer Relationship management, Customer Retention and experience Management, Concept of Customer Lifetime Value– Case Studies. Unit-II Customer Satisfaction- Meaning and definition of Satisfaction, Concept of consumer satisfaction, Identification of determinants of customer satisfaction, Assessing customer satisfaction, relationship between customer satisfaction and service quality – Case Studies. Unit-III Customer Loyalty-Meaning and definition of Customer Loyalty, Customer Loyalty formation, Customer Loyalty outcomes, Emotion quadrant model of Customer Loyalty, Customer Loyalty Assessment – Case Studies. Unit-IV Enablers of Relationship Marketing-CRM Technologies, Role of Call Centres, Enterprise Marketing management, People factor in relationship marketing, Customer centric recruitment, selection and development of employees, Informational technology and Relationship marketing, Profitability and Relationship marketing – Case Studies.
Unit-V CRM Softwares- Data Warehousing and Data Mining, Artificial Intelligence and its role in CRM, Future of Relationship marketing and its implications on organizations – Case Studies. Course Outcome:
At the completion of the course, student will be able to analyse relationship theory and relationship economics from the point of view of the customer and the organisation. Students will be able to critically analyse an organisation's relational strategies with different stakeholder groups. Finally they will be able to formulate and assess strategic, operational and tactical CRM decisions as well.
References:
(Text Books) 1. AtulParvatiyar and Sheth (1999). Handbook of Relationship Marketing, Sage publications. 2. Parvatiyar, A., and Sheth, J. N. (2001). Customer relationship management: emerging
practice, process, and discipline. Journal of Economic and Social research, 3(2), 1-34. (Reference Books)
3. Godson, M. (2009). Relationship marketing. Oxford University Press. 4. Mukerjee Kaushik (2007). Customer Relationship Management: A Strategic Approach to
Marketing 1st Edition. 5. Zikmund, W. G., McLeod, R., and Gilbert, F. W. (2003). Customer relationship
management: Integrating marketing strategy and information technology. Wiley. 6. Baron, S., Conway, T., and Warnaby, G. (2010). Relationship marketing: A consumer
experience approach. Sage Publications. 7. Biswas, S. (2011). Relationship marketing: Concepts, theories and cases. PHI Learning
Pvt. Ltd. 8. Alok Kumar Rai (2012). Customer Relationship Management: Concepts and Cases,
Prentice Hall of India.
MARKETING OF SERVICES (MBA 236) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: This will make students learn the basics and fundamentals of service industry and acquaint them with the art of pleasing a customer for satisfaction and loyalty. This will teach them the concept of SERVQUAL and how important the concept is to the industry and why. This will also provide the basic understanding of designing of service blueprints. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction to Services Marketing: Services economy-evaluation and growth of service sector, nature and scope of services, characteristics, classification, service market potential, expanded marketing mix for services, service quality, introduction to gaps model – Case Studies. Unit-II Focus on Customers: Assessing service-marketing opportunities, customer expectations and perceptions of services, customer behaviour specific to usage of services, service markets segmentation, market targeting and selection – Case Studies. Unit-III Service Design: Levels of service product, service life cycle, new service development, service blue print, physical evidence and service scope, competitive differentiation of services, pricing of services- methods and specific issues – Case Studies. Unit-IV Service Delivery: People in service, service process-direct distribution, channel functions, channels selection, impact of information technology, designing communications mix for promoting services, building service customer relationships and service recovery, role of internal marketing in service delivery – Case Studies. Unit-V Marketing Services for Different Industries: Formulating service marketing strategies for health, hospitality, tourism, logistics, financial, information technology, educational, entertainment and public utility services – Case Studies.
Course Outcome:
On course completion students will have an understanding of the facts that why service sector is the most rewarding sector to an economy this course will familiarize them with the terminologies for using in field. The students will start the implementation of quality in services and excellence in their own work. References:
(Text Books)
1. Lovelock, C. (2011). Services Marketing, 7/e. Pearson Education India. 2. Zeithaml (2011). Services Marketing – Sie, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
(Reference Books)
3. Nimit Chowdhary and Monika Chaudhary (2005). Text book of marketing of Services, the Indian Experience, Macmillan Publishing Co.
4. Shanker, R. (2002). Services Marketing in Indian Perspective. Excel Books India. 5. Wilson, A., Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2012). Services marketing:
Integrating customer focus across the firm 6/e, McGraw Hill. 6. Peter Mudie, Angela Pirrie (2012). Services Marketing Management, Routledge. 7. Kapoor (2011). Service Marketing: Concepts & Practices, Tata McGraw Hill.
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (MBA 246)
Total: 100 Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: From corporate giants to small businesses, product-manufacturing industries operating within all verticals constantly attempt to enhance logistics and operations techniques and practices. This course introduces the concept of supply chain management and evaluates the core fundamentals of supply chain. Students develop the ability to conceptualize, design, and implement supply chains aligned with product, market, and customer characteristics.With the help of this course students develop the ability to evaluate how information flows can substitute for the stock of physical resources, such as inventory. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be Six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Introduction and Drivers of SCM: Introduction to Logistics & Supply Chain Management, Definition, Objectives, Significance, Decision Phase, Supply chain characteristics & Relationships. Drivers of SCM Performance, global supply chain management, forecasting-types, static method forecasting, adaptive method, procuring raw material and purchase process, errors – Case Studies. Unit-II
Components of SCM: Inventory Management- defining, costs of keeping inventory, EOQ-Approach, ABC Analysis, Risk & Uncertainty Models, Lead time – Case Studies. Unit-III Location and Transportation: Warehousing-role and concept of warehousing, types of warehousing, planning Warehouse operations, site selection, layout, material handling, management of receipts and issues. Importance and modes of transportation, selection of transportation modes, documents and carrier liabilities, transportation management, multimodal transportation – Case Studies. Unit-IV Packaging and Communication: Defining package & packaging, importance to customer service, utilization, importance in SCM Role of information, information processing at each step, role of IT in SCM, importance of communication at each level – Case Studies.
Unit-V Additional Dimensions: JIT philosophy, Quick response logistics, distribution control and performance evaluation – Case Studies. Course Outcome: At the completion of this course, the student should be able to examine the design and performance of supply networks and processes in different business contexts. Students develop capabilities in forecasting, coordination for supply chain integration, inventory management, procurement, JIT, product and process design, and global supply chain management.
References:
(Text Books)
1. Bowersox (1973). Physical Distribution Management, Tata McGraw Hill. 2. Stern, L. W., El-Ansary, A. I., & Coughlan, A. T. (1996). Marketing channels,, Vol. 5,
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(Reference Books)
3. Khanna, K. K. (1985). Physical Distribution Management: Logistical Approach. Himalaya Publishing House.
4. Stock & Lambert, (2001). Strategic Logistics Management, Tata McGraw Hill. 5. William Y. C. Wang, Michael S. H. Heng, Patrick Y. K. Chau (2007). Supply Chain
Management: Issues in the New Era of Collaboration and Competition, Idea Group Inc (IGI).
6. Janat Shah (2009). Supply Chain Management: Text and Cases, Pearson Education. 7. Lawrence D. Fredendall, Ed Hill (2000). Basics of Supply Chain Management, CRC Press. 8. Birgit Dam Jespersen, Tage Skjott-Larsen (2005). Supply Chain Management: In Theory
and Practice, Copenhagen Business School Press. 9. Charles C. Poirier (1999). Advanced Supply Chain Management: How to Build a Sustained
Competitive Advantage, Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 10. James B. Ayers (2006). Handbook of Supply Chain Management, Second Edition,
Auerbach Publications.
EMERGING CONCEPTS IN MARKETING-II (MBA-II 256) Total: 100
Theory: 50 L –T Sessionals: 50 3- 1 Time: 3 hrs (Credits-3.5) Course Objective: The major aim of this paper is to familiarize the students the emerging marketing concept. The students understanding of the concept of green marketing and Neuro marketing will increase to the level providing inputs to the organisation on the matter related to it in an organisation. Social marketing these days is enjoying as limelight in the corporate sector. This course aims to teach how to use social and cause-related factors for the benefit of company’s profitability. Note for the Paper Setter: The number of questions to be set will be six, at least one from each unit. Out of these one question will be compulsory. The examinee will be required to attempt the compulsory one and any other four questions. All questions shall carry equal marks. Unit-I Neuro Marketing- The Rationale, The Human Brain and Marketing, Nervous System and Brand Communication, Brand Communication and Memory, Advertising and Seven Sins of Memory, Applications of Neuro Marketing, Neuro Marketing and Product Life-Cycle – Case studies. Unit-II Green Marketing- An overview of Green Marketing, Strategic Green Planning, Sustainable Marketing- The Environment and Consumption, The Environmental Effects of Consumption, Discovering Value via Market Analysis, Delivering Value via Sustainable Supply Cycle Strategies, Monitoring and Reporting Sustainability Efforts – Case studies Unit-III Cause Related Marketing- Meaning, Concept and Impact of Cause Related Marketing, Understanding Social Marketing - Defining Social Marketing, 10 Steps in the Strategic Marketing and Planning Process, 7 Ps of Social Marketing– Case Studies Unit-IV Social Marketing Environment- Determining Research Needs and Options, Choosing a Purpose and Focus for your Plan and Conducting a Situation Analysis. Selecting Target Audiences, Objectives and Goals -Segmenting, Evaluating and Selecting Target Audience, Setting Behavior Objectives and Goals– Case Studies.
Unit-V Marketing Analytics- Concept and Importance, Disruptive technologies, Big Data- Brief Introduction, Introduction to Machine Learning & Deep Learning, Text Mining, Recent Advances in Marketing Analytics- Case Studies Course Outcome: After the completion of the course the students will be able to apply sustainable marketing techniques in the favor of an organisation. They will understand the psychology of a customer better in technicality and logically. This course will also acquaint the students with the understanding of social factor impact on customer psychology and also how to utilize the same to fame and defame certain organisations.
References: (Text Books)
1. Sharma J. K., Agarwal D. P., Singh Deepali, Deepak K. K (2010). Neuromarketing: A Peep Into Customers Minds, Print Edition, PHI Publications
2. Deshpande, S., & Lee, N. R. (2014). Social Marketing in India. SAGE Publications India. 3. Evans, D. (2012). Social media marketing: An hour a day. John Wiley & Sons. 4. Jacquelyn Ottman (2011). The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and
Inspiration for Sustainable Branding, Berrett-Koehler Publishers 5. John Grant (2009). The Green Marketing Manifesto, John Wiley & Sons
(Reference Books)
6. Robert Dahlstrom (2011). Green Marketing Management, Cengage Learning 7. John F. Wasik (1996) Green Marketing and Management: A Global Perspective, Wiley
Publications 8. Gerard Hastings, Kathryn Angus, Carol Bryant (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social
Marketing, Sage Publications 9. Dan Zarrella (2010). The Social Media Marketing Book, "O'Reilly Media, Inc 10. Alan R. Andreasen (2006). Social Marketing in the 21st Century, SAGE Publications 11. Stephen Genco, Peter SteidlAndrew Pohlmann, (2013). Neuromarketing For Dummies,
John Wiley & Sons 12. Patrick Renvoise (2007). Neuromarketing: Understanding the Buy Buttons in Your
Customer's Brain, Thomas Nelson Inc 13. Leon Zurawicki (2013). Neuromarketing: Exploring the Brain of the Consumer, Springer
Publications 14. Avinash, K. (2011). Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of
Customer Centricity. 15. Jeffery, M. (2010). Data-driven marketing: the 15 metrics everyone in marketing should
know. John Wiley & Sons. 16. Cutroni, J. (2010). Google Analytics: Understanding Visitor Behavior. " O'Reilly Media,
Inc.". 17. Hemann, C., &Burbary, K. (2013). Digital marketing analytics: Making sense of consumer
data in a digital world. Pearson Education. 18. Kotler, P., &Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social
change. The Journal of Marketing, 3-12.
Department of Industries & Commerce, Haryana
Form-III
“Certificate of Registration to be issued under Section 9(1) of the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act,2012”
(See rule 5 and rule 6)
Certificate of Registration of Society
I hereby certify that a Society bearing the Registration Number and name as undermentioned has been registered this [24] day[Oct] month [2016] year under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 (Haryana Act No. 1 of 2012).
State Code District Code Year Of Registration Registration Number
H R 4 2 0 1 6 0 1 2 6 9
Name Of the Society Registered Office Address
NIT Kurukshetra Alumni Association Room No. A-313, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra 136119
Issued under my hand at [Kurukshetra] this [24] day of (month)[Oct] (Year)[2016] having Unique Identification Number -2000115293
Issuing Authority, District Registrar, , Haryana.
SOME IMPORTANT PROVISIONS OF THE HRRS ACT 2012 TO BE FOLLOWED :
One Flat one vote.Collegium Scheme to be approved from District Registrar if members strength is more than 1000.Administrator if appointed will not enroll new members, incur capital expenditure and give employement in the society.Terms of Governing Body not to be more than 3 years.Member to be not less than 21 year age.Office bearers of society (Three to twenty one).General Body and other meeting should be conducted with quorum i.e 1st meeting - 40%, 2nd meeting - 25% and 3rd meeting -15% (see entire Provisions)Submission of mandatory Annual Returns i.e. list of members, list of members of collegium, list of office bearers, Annual Reporton working, Balance Sheet & Auditors Report, Copy of special resolution otherwise shall attract penalities & fines as perprovisions of Act.In case of Joint Apartment owners, 1st owner will be eligible to contest the elections.Proxy voting not allowed.Condominium/ Association covered under Apartment Ownership Act 1983 is to be formed by owners only.Election observer may be appointed by District Registrar or on request of Society
Verification Link: https://haryanaindustries.gov.in/msme/verify/societyregistration/id/115293/reg/06-004-2016-01269
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)