Radiographic Artifacts - Canvas

15
Radiographic Artifacts NOT ESPECIALLY OLD OR VALUABLE Chris Ober, DVM, PhD, DACVR 14 February 2011 Artifacts Defined Any opacity on the radiograph that does not correspond to an actual anatomic structure Any misrepresentation of an actual anatomic structure Anything decreasing radiographic quality Quick CR primer Cassette exposed by x- rays; storage phosphors excited Quick CR primer Cassette exposed by x- rays; storage phosphors excited Cassette put into reader Quick CR primer Laser shines onto detectors Quick CR primer Laser shines onto detectors Excited phosphors give off light photons

Transcript of Radiographic Artifacts - Canvas

Radiographic Artifacts

NOT ESPECIALLY OLD OR VALUABLE

• Chris Ober, DVM, PhD, DACVR

• 14 February 2011

Artifacts Defined

• Any opacity on the radiograph that does not correspond to an actual anatomic structure

• Any misrepresentation of an actual anatomic structure

• Anything decreasing radiographic quality

Quick CR primer

• Cassette exposed by x-rays; storage phosphors excited

Quick CR primer

• Cassette exposed by x-rays; storage phosphors excited

• Cassette put into reader

Quick CR primer

• Laser shines onto detectors

Quick CR primer

• Laser shines onto detectors

• Excited phosphors give off light photons

Quick CR primer

• Laser shines onto detectors

• Excited phosphors give off light photons

• Light photons travel through light guide

Quick CR primer

• Laser shines onto detectors

• Excited phosphors give off light photons

• Light photons travel through light guide

• Image produced by computer

Quick DR primer

• Panel exposed by x-rays, detectors excited

• Data sent directly to computer via cord

• Image created

Sequence: Film-Screen

• Film storage & handling

• Positioning

• Exposure

• Film handling

• Film processing– Manual

– Automatic

• Image archiving

Sequence: CR (With Cassette)

• Cassette storage

• Positioning

• Exposure

• Postexposure

• Cassette reading

• Workstation

Sequence: DR (No Cassette)

• Panel storage

• Positioning

• Exposure

• Image reading & transfer

• Workstation

Another Classification System

• Color– Black

– White

• Distribution– Focal

– Regional or Global

Storage & Pre-Exposure Handling Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Pressure

• Abrasions & Scratches

• Fingerprints

• Static electricity

• Material in cassette

• Fog

• Light leak

CR & DR

• Storage scatter (CR)

Pressure Artifacts –Film Crease Crescents (SF)

• Black & focal

• Cause: rough handling

• Pressure from crease causes activation of crystals

• NOT caused by fingernail (usually)

Pressure Artifacts –Film Crease Crescents (SF)

Abrasions & Scratches (SF)

• Black or white, focal

• Cause: rough handling

• Black: pressure from abrasion activates crystals

• White: emulsion has been removed (scratch)

• Can feel texture in emulsion

Fingerprints (SF)

• Focal

• White: most common– Oil on fingertips blocks

developer

OR– Fixer on fingertips

Fingerprints (SF)

• Focal

• White: most common– Oil on fingertips blocks

developer

OR– Fixer on fingertips

Fingerprints (SF)

• Black: less common– Developer on

fingertips

• Prevent:– Keep fingers dry and

clean

– Touch only film edges

Hogge JP, et al.RadioGraphics 1999.

Static Electricity (SF)

• Black & focal

• Two patterns– Branching

– Smudge / Spot

• Cause: electrical discharge

Static Electricity (SF)

• Prevent:– Moderate humidity

– Avoid friction while handling film

– Antistatic cassette cleaners

Static Electricity (SF)

Hogge JP, et al.RadioGraphics 1999.

Material in Cassette /Dirty Screen (SF)

• White & focal

• Sharp margins (close to film – no penumbra)

• Cause: Visible light photons from screen can’t reach and expose film emulsion

Material in Cassette /Dirty Screen (SF)

• THUS “radiolucent”material can still cause this artifact

• Common causes– Hair

– Dust

Fog (SF)

• Increased blackness, usually regional or global

• Definition: any unwanted film exposure / development

• Decreased image contrast and detail

Fog (SF)

• Causes:– Light exposure

– Heat• (store at < 68 F)

– Humidity • (keep at 30-50%)

– Radiation (including scatter)

– Chemicals

– Old film

Fog (SF)

Hogge JP, et al.RadioGraphics 1999.

Light Leak (SF)

• Black, focal to global

• A form of fog

• Sources:– Storage bin (along 1

edge)

– Cassette not closed (1 edge or corner)

– Overhead light

– Safelight filter crack

Storage Scatter (CR)

• Black & global

• Like fog – unwanted exposure of CR plate

• Causes:– Background radiation

– Scatter from imaging procedure

Jiménez DA, et al.Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008.

Positioning Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Magnification

• Foreshortening / distortion

• Patient rotation

• Upside-down cassette

• Grid cutoff

CR & DR

• Magnification

• Foreshortening / distortion

• Patient rotation

• Upside-down cassette (CR) or panel (DR)

• Grid cutoff

Magnification

• Object closer to film:– Closer to normal size

– Sharper margins

• Object farther from film:– Magnified

– Less distinct margins

Foreshortening / Distortion

• X-ray beam does not pass perpendicular to long axis of structure

• Differential magnification of structure

Foreshortening / Distortion

Patient Rotation

• A form of distortion• Lesions may be

masked by atypical superimposition on normal anatomy

• Unusual projection of normal anatomy may be incorrectly diagnosed as abnormal

Upside-down Cassette (SF)

• White & focal• Springs & latches on

back of cassette block x-ray beam

• Global lightness• Lead backing absorbs

some x-ray photons (film appears underexposed)

Upside-down Cassette (SF) Upside-down Cassette (SF)

Upside-down Cassette (CR)

• White & multifocal

• Construction of cassette back absorbs x-rays

• Pattern depends on manufacturer

Upside-down Cassette (CR)

Upside-down Panel (DR)

• White & multifocal

• Electronics in the back of the panel absorb x-rays

Grid Cutoff (SF, CR, DR)

• White, regional to global

• Orientation of lead strips in grid requires appropriate geometry relative to x-ray beam

• Wrong geometry lead strips attenuate more x-rays

Laterally DecenteredFocused Grid

Result: Too white acrossentire image

Off-Level Focused Grid

Result: Too white acrossentire image

Upside-Down Focused Grid

Result: OK in the center,Severely too white at periphery

Distance DecenteredFocused Grid

• Similar to upside-down grid– OK in the center,

Markedly too white at periphery

• Often not as severe as upside-down grid

Combined Lateral and Distance Decentering of Grid

Result: OK on one side,Gradually whiter towardother side

Exposure Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Motion

• Double exposure

• Overexposure

• Underexposure

• Material obstructing x-ray beam

CR & DR

• Motion

• Double exposure (CR)

• Overexposure (Saturation)

• Underexposure

• Material obstructing x-ray beam

Motion (SF, CR, DR)

• Blurring of moving parts

• Exposure does have a finite interval

• Reduce with:– Better restraint

– Sedation

– Decreased exposure time

Motion (SF, CR, DR)

Double Exposure (SF, CR)

• Appearance of 2 summated images

• Cause: Cassette inadvertently exposed more than once– Press exposure trigger

twice

– Forget to change cassette after first view

Double Exposure (SF, CR)

• SF: Black, global– 2 exposures =

overexposure artifact

• CR: Normal grayscale– Wide latitude can

usually accommodate the overexposure

• DR: Can’t happen– Image is transferred to

computer immediately

Double Exposure (SF, CR) Overexposure (SF)

• Black & global

• Patient info label normal

• Cause: Too much activation of emulsion crystals– High mAs or kVp

– Line surge

– Double exposure, Fog

Saturation (CR, DR)

• Black, may only be apparent in parts of image

• Just like SF overexposure

• High exposure maxes out sensitivity range of detector– Anatomy (esp. thinner

parts) may be “burned through”

Saturation (CR, DR)

• Black, may only be apparent in parts of image

• Just like SF overexposure

• High exposure maxes out sensitivity range of detector– Anatomy (esp. thinner

parts) may be “burned through”

Paradoxical Overexposure, Saturation, & Planking (DR)

Paradoxical Overexposure, Saturation, & Planking (DR)

Underexposure (SF)

• White & global

• Patient info label normal

• Cause: Too little activation of emulsion crystals– Low mAs or kVp

– General x-ray obstruction

– X-ray tube troubles

Underexposure:Quantum Mottle (CR, DR)

• Noisy & global

• Computer algorithms adjust image to remain gray

• Low signal level causes grainy appearance and poor contrast & sharpness

• Cause: As with SF

Underexposure:Quantum Mottle (CR, DR)

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

• White, focal

• Cause: Any radiopaque structure in the path of the x-ray beam– On patient

– In patient

– On table

– On cassette

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

OMG!It’s a fracture fragment!

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

…or gravel on the table.

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

Material ObstructingX-Ray Beam (SF, CR, DR)

Material Obstructing X-Ray Beam

Post-Exposure Handling Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Pressure

• Abrasions

• Fingerprints

• Static electricity

• Fog

• Light leak

CR & DR

• Not Applicable

Processing / Reading Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Overdevelopment

• Underdevelopment

• Insufficient mixing

• Incomplete fixation

• Incomplete washing

• Pi lines (LAB)

• Guide shoe lines (LAB)

• Kissing defects

CR & DR

• Dirty light guide (CR)

• Cassette debris (CR)

Overdevelopment (SF)

• Black & global

• Patient info label also black

• Cause: Too much metallic Ag forms in emulsion crystals– Developer too hot

– Developed too long

Underdevelopment (SF)

• White & global

• Patient info label also white

• Cause: Too little metallic Ag forms in emulsion crystals– Developer too cold

– Developed too little time

Insufficient Mixing (SF) Inadequate Fixation (SF)

• Initially film is cloudy and milky

• Over time appears yellow/brown –Dichroic stain

Incomplete Washing / Rinsing (SF)

• Fixer remains– Cloudy, sticky residue

– Yellow-brown stain

– Sulfur smell

Kissing Defects (SF)

Dirty Light Guide (CR)

• White & focal• Sharp white line• Cause:

– Light emitted from plate reaches light guide

– Dirt blocks path for an entire line of data

– No light along that line = assumption that there was no exposure

Dirty Light Guide (CR)

• White & focal• Sharp white line• Cause:

– Light emitted from plate reaches light guide

– Dirt blocks path for an entire line of data

– No light along that line = assumption that there was no exposure

Dirty Light Guide (CR)

• White & focal• Sharp white line• Cause:

– Light emitted from plate reaches light guide

– Dirt blocks path for an entire line of data

– No light along that line = assumption that there was no exposure

Cassette Debris (CR)

• White & focal

• Sharp margins

• Essentially the same as FS dirty cassette

• EXCEPT…

Cassette Debris (CR)

• Problem is that photons emitted from plate during reading don’t reach photomultiplier tube

• (Contrast with FS, where light photons from screen don’t reach film)

Workstation Artifacts

Screen-Film

• Not Applicable

CR & DR

• Faulty Transfer (DR)

• Clipping

• Planking

• Uberschwinger

Faulty Transfer (CR, DR)

• Appearance: Anything goes, generally distorted anatomy

• Cause: Problems in data transfer to workstation– Memory problems

– Communication errors (e.g. loose cables)

– Power fluctuation

Faulty Transfer (DR)

Uberschwinger (CR, DR)

• Black & focal

• Black lines occur around dense structures– Can be mistaken for

loosening or infection of implants

• Cause: Certain processing algorithms (edge-enhancement)

Uberschwinger (CR, DR)

What Have We Learned?

• People can manage to screw up any stage of the radiographic process.

• Recognizing artifacts and when they occur is the only way to make good radiographs.

• Look up “Mr. Yuk” on Wikipedia for a video that scarred my childhood.