Summary of Accomplishments of Nominee Principal Fields of Interest
Porch of Confessors
-
Upload
texaswomans -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Porch of Confessors
Porch of the Confessors: St. Martin, Jerome, and
Gregory 1220-1230
Carved Stone
Chartres Cathedral
Analysis by:
Alicia Berdan
The Cathedrals of France
Art 4903
The Porch of Confessors is a prime example of high gothic
architecture on one of the most renowned French Cathedrals, Chartres
Cathedral. Chartres Cathedral was rebuilt from the destroyed
Romanesque church and brought about the birth of the High Gothic norm
of four part vaulting (Kleiner 470). Chartres’ transepts were erected
in 1194 after the fire that destroyed most of the city and the former
church (Kleiner 472). The sculpture of the south transept date from
1220 to 1230 after the transept was built (Kleiner 473). St. Martin,
Jerome, and Gregory are located on the jambs of the right portal on
the Porch of the Confessors on the south transept of Chartres
Cathedral (Stones 1).
The Porch of Confessors is an example of the changing forms of
sculpture from the Romanesque age to the Gothic (Kleiner 473). The
sculptures are carved in stone and recall the revolutionary
developments of Greek sculpture (Kleiner 473). These three Saint jamb
figures reveal this change in sculpture because they have more
individual personalities and break away from the rigid vertical lines
of the Romanesque sculpture (Kleiner 473). St. Martin, Jerome, and
Gregory are calmer and quieter sculptures but they have moved away
from the jam columns and have less stiff and shallow vertical accents
(Kleiner 473). The depth of these figures is immensely great in
comparison to the sculpture that is seen on many Romanesque cathedrals
2
and buildings. There is a breakthrough in the detail and personality
of human faces to give more distinct attributes to these sculptures,
whereas before in the Romanesque period the faces were more
spiritually moved than particularized (Kleiner 473). Having the
sculptures of the saints placed on the door jams gives them balance
and equality because they are parallel (O’Connell 107). St. Martin,
Jerome, and Gregory have physical features and symbolic items to help
the viewer determine who they are and why they were important (Kleiner
473).
The three figures together create a great sense of balance and
peace. Each of the Saints right hands appears higher than their left.
By placing St. Jerome in between St. Martin and St. Gregory he creates
a balance of heights. St. Jerome is a significantly shorter than the
other two, St. Martin and St. Gregory’s hats are both pointed, adding
more height, where as St. Jerome’s is not, St. Jerome’s hands are
lower than the other two sculptures and he is dressed more plainly
than St. Martin and St. Gregory. Both St. Martin and St. Gregory’s
heads turn and look to the left while St. Jerome’s face tilts to the
right creating a visual stop between each sculpture. Despite the
sculptural differences the length of the clothes are the same and have
similar necklines on their robes.
3
St. Martin of Tours is the sculpture located on the jam closest
to the right portal and stationed on the right side of St. Jerome.
The jam sculpture of St. Martin is ideal of High Gothic sculpture
because his body has become almost separate from the jam, his clothes
create soft folds over his body, and his head is turned slightly away
from a straight forward view (Kleiner 473). Martin of Tours was born
between 315 and 317 in Sabaria, Pannonia, which is known today as
Steinamanger, Hungary to a pagan Roman tribune (Holweck 667). Saint
Martin was baptized at the age of twenty and spent his life fighting
against the pagan men of his country (Holweck 667-668). Martin of
Tours was said to be a man of “strong [nature] and independent
character of unassuming simplicity, noble benevolence, and an
incorruptible sense of justice, sound judgment and popular eloquence”
(Holweck 668). The jamb statue of St. Martin is dressed as a bishop,
shown with a beard and halo, and has his right hand raised in a
gesture of blessing while his left hand holds a staff (Stones 1). The
halo placed behind St. Martin’s head is a “symbol of divinity or
sanctity, originally based on the nimbus that surrounds the sun”
(O’Connell 226). St. Martin is dressed in the robes of a bishop
because in 371 he was elected Bishop of Tours by the people and the
clergy (Holweck 668). In St. Martin’s left hand he holds a crosier
which is “a staff resembling a shepherd’s crook carried by bishops…as
4
a sign of office” (“Croiser”). The right hand was disfigured from
times of turmoil in France, but according to Allison Stones, Martin of
Tour’s right hand is raised in a gesture of blessing (Stones 2). St.
Martin’s hand would have had the thumb, index finger, and middle
fingers raised while the others were curled to symbolize the Latin
form of the blessing of the Trinity (Gast 8). St. Martin of Tours is
said to be standing on dogs that are licking his crosier, because he
had stopped them from chasing a hare (Stones 2). Instead of dogs, St.
Martin might be standing on two stags which were the “symbol of piety
and devotion and of safety in God’s care” (Gast 19). St. Martin was an
important figure in Chartres Cathedral’s sculpture and stained-glass
(Stones 3). One of Martin of Tours’ miracles is shown on the tympanum
above the right door of the south transept and there are two
clerestory windows dedicated to him (Stones 3).
In between St. Martin and Gregory the Great is a more homely
dressed St. Jerome. St. Jerome was born in Stridon, Dalmatia in 341
and his body was brought to rest in the Sistine chapel of S. M.
Maggiore after his death in 420 (Holweck 528). St. Jerome also has a
halo behind his head to symbolize his divinity or sanctity (O’Connell
226). In his hands Jerome holds a book and a scroll which would
symbolize his scholarship and his translation of the bible from Hebrew
and Greek to Latin (Stones 4). St. Jerome is perched upon a
5
blindfolded woman who is identified as a “Synagoga, the
personification of a Jewish Synagog” (Stones 4). The “Synagoga” might
symbolize to St. Jerome his translation of a Jewish Hebrew bible into
Latin and he spent much of his life in the Holy Land (O’Connell 44).
In 386 Jerome settled in Bethlehem where he finished his most
important writings and his translation of the Bible (Holweck 528).
The tilting of St. Jerome’s head towards St. Martin is signature of
the gothic architecture style in which sculpture was starting to
interact with other surrounding sculptures (Kleiner 473). St. Jerome’s
face has a more serene and kind appearance of a scholar (Kleiner 473).
The last of the three saints in this section of the porch jams is
St. Gregory the Great. St. Gregory was born in Rome in 540 and died in
604 (Holweck 446). Gregory the Great is sculpted in the papal
vestments because in February of 590 he was elected Pope and his
pontificate lasted for a glorious 14 years (Holweck 446). Upon his
head he wears a Pallium, which was an earlier version of the papal
tiara (Stones 4). St. Gregory’s head is tilted slightly to the left as
if he was lost in thought as he listened to the dove on his right
shoulder (Kleiner 4730). A dove symbolizes the Holy Spirit and was
said to have put its beak between St. Gregory’s lips while he was
writing his homilies (Stones 4). Having the Holy Spirit on St.
Gregory’s shoulder makes him a man of great importance, and he was.
6
Gregory the Great is responsible of the spread of Christianity to
England when he sent St. Augustine there with forty missioners
(Holweck 446). The left hand of St. Gregory holds a scroll which is an
emblem that recognizes him for his scholarly gift of writing (Gast
19). A scroll could also symbolize the law that St. Gregory had and
created during his time as Pope (O’Connel 241).
The jamb sculptures of St. Martin, St. Jerome, and St. Gregory
helped to make Chartres Cathedral a driving force of new gothic
architecture in France. The placement of these sculptures by the right
portal on the Porch of Confessors made them important figures of
Christianity for the people of Chartres to see and remember when
attending church. Despite their few disfigurations these jam figures
will continue to be prominent examples of the beginning of gothic
architecture.
7
Bibliography
Holweck, The RT.REV.F.G. A Biographical Dictionary of the Saints. St.
Louis. B. Herder Book Co. 1924
Stones, Dr. Allison. “Chartres: Cathedral of Notre Dame”. Digital
Research Library. 2007. University of Pittsburgh. 25 May 2009.
http://images.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/i/image/image-idx?
q1=FCSP33363*;rgn1=chartres_fn;type=simple;view=thumbnail;c=chart
res
Kleiner, Fred S. Gardener’s Art Through The Ages: A Global History 13 th
Edition. Boston. The Thomas Corporation. 2009.
O’Connell, Mark and Raje Airey. The Complete Encyclopedia of Signs andSymbols. Hermes House. 2006
“Crosier.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009. Merriam-Webster Online. 26 May 2009. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crosier.
Gast, Walter E. Symbols in Christian Art and Architecture. 2000. Walter E. Gast. 26 May 2009. http://wegast.home.att.net/symbols/.
8
Our present is rapidly moving towards a retro-techno future where
we will see fusion of humans and animals beyond our imagination, but
perhaps not beyond the imagination of Patricia Piccinini. In this
essay I will dive into the imagination of Patricia Piccinini and take
a closer look at the contemporary sculptures she fabricates to
enlighten her viewers on a future she believes is not so science
fictional. Piccinini’s works force her viewers to face a future not
every person might be comfortable with. Yet her works bring to life a
future that is quite possible with the ever-growing understanding of
science and genetics. Through Piccinini’s works we can envision a
future with life forms that captivate our curiosities while repulsing
us with their oddities. If you are interested in how our society is
and is progressing as a hyper-nano-digi-techno-cyber-micro-
bioengineered-society, than Piccinini’s work will intrigue and inspire
you to dive deeper in what the future might hold for us (Toffoletti
1).
Born in Sierra Leone in 1965 though now living in Melbourne
Australia, Patricia Piccinini is a sculptor who works with a large
array of multimedia to create realistic future representatives of
genetic experiments (Robertson 264). She received a Bachelor of Arts
in Economic History from the Australian National University and a
10
Bachelor of Arts in Painting from the Victorian College of the Arts
(Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery). Piccinini is an “offspring of white settler
colonies, their frontier practices, their ongoing immigrations and
their bad memories and trouble discourses of indigeneity, belonging,
appropriation, wastelands, progress and exclusion” (Haraway). Donna
Haraway in her essay “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s
Generations” considers Piccinini to be a sister of hers in the art
world of “naturecultures” and an engaging feminist in the realm of
science fiction. In 2003, Patricia Piccinini represented Australia at
the Venice Biennale with six sculptural groupings entitled We Are Family
(Robertson 264). Piccinini is represented by galleries from at least
three different countries: Tolarno Galleries and Roslyn Okley9 Gallery
in Australia, the Haunch of Venison in New York, Conner Contemporary
Art, and the FaMa Gallery in Verona, Italy (Piccinini).
Piccinini’s works take on a frontier of hyperrealism that gives
the viewers small ecological habitats that blur our ideas of what is
real and what is fiction (Robertson 264 and Haraway). Through the use
of resin, silicon, wood, fiberglass, clothing, human hair, and many
other forms of media she creates sculptures that immediately attracts
our attention due to their realistic and almost human nature. Inspired
by science, genetics, and future life forms Piccinini creates
11
sculptures that set up the viewer to think and react to a wide range
of possible genetically human creations and mutations. Her works
references the term transgenics, which is a field of research that deals
with the mixing and combining of genetic material from many different
living organisms (Robertson 265). As humans we believe that we are
very unique and no other species comes close to having the same
traits, but Piccinini’s works have us interact with creatures that are
so closely related to us yet are bizarre and grotesque. Piccinini
inspires us to think about our everyday basic rights and what our
lives would be like if her “creatures” existed in them. Despite
Piccinini’s critter sculptures being quite visually grotesque they
have a sense of sweetness and care. In her piece The Young Family, we see
a creature much a like a rabbit-monkey-human taking care of her little
babies much like a human or animal mother. In her piece Leather
Landscape, the viewer must confront these genetic altered creatures
interacting with a young female child while nursing their own
genetically altered children. In many of her pieces we find references
to our visual representations of young human children because as a
child we accept and learn to love things more easily that we do as
adults.
12
Piccinini’s piece The Long Awaited intrigued me as viewer for a
variety of reasons. Among them was the massive size of this nude obese
mermaid like creature that reclines on a bench with its’ head in a
young white boy’s lap. They appear to be waiting for something while
peacefully resting. The “mermaid” like creature has one solid body
with no separated limbs for legs that leads into a fin like form that
represents the combining of the two human feet with ten toes. It has
two arms, which have 5 fingers and no thumbs. Due to its human
qualities I naturally want to discern its gender but can reason my
self to believe that it might be male or female. The appearance of
wrinkles and white hair would reference in a human the sign of elderly
age though the viewer cannot be certain in this case. The oversized
head gives the impression of a manatee morphed with a human face. The
young white boy with brown hair is sitting on the far right side of
the bench with the mermaid creature’s head in his lap. He himself is
resting his right arm and head with closed eyes along the side of the
creature. The boy appears to be young due to his features and his feet
dangling off the bench and not being able to touch the ground.
To understand Patricia Piccinini’s work The Long Awaited you must
understand the basics of transgenics and bioengineering. By definition
Transgenic is “ relating to an organism whose genome has been altered
13
by the transfer of a gene or genes from another species or breed”
(Transgenic). The organisms that are used in transgenic research bring
to light the possibilities of combining more than one species
(Transgenic). Bioengineering deals with the re-combining of DNA from
different genetic sources (Robertson 265). By combining two different
DNAs with the use of technology, humans can further the progress of
evolution faster than at a natural rate (Robertson 265). Piccinini
believes that both transgenics and bioengineering will lead humans
into a posthuman world (Toffoletti 6). The idea of a posthuman world
brings us to conceptualize about what characteristics and attributes
would identify a being that is posthuman, a being that is a
combination of different genetics (Toffoletti 6).
Piccinini’s work The Long Awaited is a visual representation of a
posthuman world. The piece deals with what a posthuman would visually
look like and how a human in a posthuman world would deal with one
(Tofoletti 6). The posthuman creature laying on the bench represents
what visually a transgenic creature would look like. It has features
that are distinctly representative of a human mixed with the features
of a manatee. Piccinini wants us to confront this posthuman and see
how we ourselves would be altered in a personal, social, and political
way. Humans love to humanize just about everything. We dress up our
14
dogs, our cats; we create little houses for our gerbils and turtles.
We buy our animals gifts and have them celebrate birthdays and
holidays with us. There are political groups that fight for animal
rights and preach about the humane way treat animals. Would we give
these same rights to posthuman creatures that we scientifically
engineer or would we be scared to lose our rights and rituals to a
posthuman race?
Piccinini’s use of the boy gently interacting with the manatee-
human creates a hopeful insight of a mutual peacefulness between the
human and posthuman races. The Long Awaited gives one scenario of a
posthuman world in which as Katherine Hayles suggests will not be the
end of the human or the rise of the anti-human but the beginning of “a
shared partnership between human and non-human forms that in the
process of this engagement challenges the boundaries of the two”
(Toffoletti 12). But Piccinini knows that not all humans will be as
accepting of the posthuman race as her fabricated boy will be. By
creating this scenario with her sculpture she gives her viewers a
preview of a world she believes will come and a chance for the viewer
to think about how they would handle a posthuman world. The idea of
mutants and monster-like humans are no longer a form of myth or
fantasies but have come to be regarded as possibilities that would
15
fracture our idea of a superior human race (Toffoletti 14). The title
of the piece The Long Awaited double references about how the sculptural
beings actually appear to be waiting, or how as a human race we have
long awaited the creation of a posthuman race.
Piccinini created The Long Awaited in a extremely realistic fashion
so that viewers would have a hard time distancing themselves from the
micro-posthuman environment. We are repulsed by the ugliness of the
manatee-human but then endeared by the relationship the young boy
seems to have with it. Humans do not tend to interact let alone touch
things with care unless someone or something is a receiver of their
feelings. The way in which the boy cradles the manatee-human in his
lap and hand shows us that he cares for this posthuman creature. In
this way Piccinini is forcing the viewer to have feelings towards the
manatee-human, she wants us to speak for it to change our thoughts and
invite ourselves to think what we wouldn’t have thought about before
(Kenway 50). Ultimately she wants to have the same feelings towards
this creatures as the young boy does, so that we can in the future
live a mutually beneficial posthuman lives. Her work has us ask
ourselves, will we love the failures of sciences as much as we love
the successes? (Kenway 48).
16
It is up to the viewer of Patricia Piccinini’s works to decided
if as humans we will accept this posthuman world that we are so
quickly approaching, or if we will choose to ignore and believe it is
all a myth. Either way, Piccinini has given her viewers a chance to
think about our futures in this bio-engineered world we live. Perhaps
soon it will not only be our food that will be genetically altered but
our very own bodies and distinctiveness as race that will be changed.
17
Works Cited
Haraway, Donna. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s
Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country”. Australian
Humanities Review. Issue 50. Web. 2011.
http://epress.anu.edu.au/apps/bookworm/view/Australian+Humanities
+Review+-+Issue+50,+2011/5451/ch06.xhtml
Kenway, Jane. Bullen, Elizabeth. Robb, Simon. Innovation and
Tradition. The Arts, Humanities, and the Knowledge of Economy.
Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2004.
Piccinini, Patricia. Patricia Piccinini. 27 September 2011. Web.
http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
Robertson, Jean and McDaniel, Craig. Themes of Contemporary Art:
Visual Art after 1980. Oxford University Press, Inc. 2010.
Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery. Patricia Piccinini. 3 Oct 2011. Web.
http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/contact/
Toffoletti, Kim. Cyborgs and Barbie Dolls: Feminism, Popular Culture,
and the Posthuman Body. I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd. 2007.
18
Transgenics. Dictionary.com. 2011. Dictionary.com, LLC.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/transgenic
19
Appendix
The Young Family
2002
Silicone, fiberglass, leather, human hair, plywood
80 x 150 x 110 cm
20
Leather Landscape
2003
Silicone, fiberglass, leather, human hair, clothing, timber
290 x 175 x 165 cm
21