nib holdings limited ABN 51 125 633 856 Preliminary final ...
Poor Decision Making Results in Huge Business Failures: Evidenced from ABN AMRO acquisition by RBS.
Transcript of Poor Decision Making Results in Huge Business Failures: Evidenced from ABN AMRO acquisition by RBS.
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY
Poor Decision MakingResults in Huge Business
FailuresEvidenced from ABN AMRO acquisition by
RBS.
Haseeb Ayaz Word Count: 2450
Poor decision making and failure of defined spectrum to follow in risky transactions often results in huge business failures. The case study of ABN AMRO acquisition by the Royal Bank of Scotland is one ofthe examples of poor decision taken by RBS management which has resulted in business failure by making the transaction one of the biggest bail-out in banking history.
Table of ContentsIntroduction to Decision Making and Problem Solving 3
Case Study 3
Acquisition of ABN AMRO by RBS 3Critical Appraisal of RBS approach to acquire ABN AMRO 6
Other Approaches Available For ABN AMRO Acquisition 8
Appropriate Decision Making and Problem Solving Techniques for ABN AMRO Acquisition 10
Implementation Method 11
2
Introduction to Decision Making and Problem Solving
A company senior’s competences and capabilities in strategic decision-
making results in competitive advantage over their competitors in fast
changing environment. Cautious management analyzes the situation
confronting them before coming to the final decision or action.
Decisions about investments or mergers and acquisitions require
vigilant consideration. Decision making demands abilities to
investigate deeper under constraints such as due-diligence reviews
which stresses expediency and quick adequate solutions to the problems
(Reinmoeller, 2013). Due diligence reviews promise to deliver trustworthy
support for strategic decision making by generating information that
can thwart mistakes by providing in-depth analysis. Regrettably, few
managers are vigilant to a fault and take costly steps to guard
against doubtful results whereas others are overconfident, and
misjudge the choice of potential consequences. Some seniors are highly
vulnerable as they allow memorable past events to explain their view
of what could have happened now. Most of the times the problem is in
the decision makers mind rather than the decision making process
(Hammond, Keeney and Raiffa, 2006).
Decision making is highly imperative and risky task as poor decisions
are often the major cause of business failures. Bad decisions are not
clearly defined, commenced with wrong information, pros and cons after
implementation of the decision are not considered appropriately.
Solutions exist on how to overcome these issues for example how you
3
consider a problem, reframing the options in different ways and try to
analyze how decision maker’s thinking might differ for each
alternative. Building these kinds of tests into our decision making
processes helps us to analyze once again about the quality of options
under consideration before it is too late to recover from the losses
as a result of bad decision (Hammond, Keeney and Raiffa, 2006).
Case Study on Poor Decision Making and Problem Solving Strategy
Acquisition of ABN AMRO by Royal Bank of Scotland
One of the leading banks in the world by assets of more than $3.5
trillion and fifth largest global market share, the Royal Bank of
Scotland, failure at the end of 2008 has elaborated as “the biggest bail-out
in history” by HM Treasury Committee UK in the Financial Service Authority
Report into the Failure of RBS, 2012-13. Blames imposed upon several
factors for the failure of RBS; acquisition of the Dutch Bank ABN AMRO
with inappropriate attention towards the risks involved and inadequate
due-diligence reviews before the acquisition was one of the
highlighted concerns among all. Over-Valued offer price at the wrong
time was not the only reason of RBS collapse, but the offer price for
acquiring ABN AMRO was one of the poor decisions taken by RBS board of
directors which substantiates failures of the effectiveness of RBS
management board (Lambert, 2011). One of the largest take over in the
banking history (J.R, 2011) in October 2007, Royal Bank of Scotland led by
a consortium with Santander of Spain and Fortis of Belgian Banking
Group has acquired ABN AMRO for £50bn with around 79% cash based which
was more than 50% over valued bid price during the time of European
Crises whereas 20%-30% premium are considered as normal in offer for
acquisitions (Robinson, 2012).
4
Earlier, Barclays of Britain offered $91bn in shares to acquire ABN
AMRO (latimes, 2007) which was initially agreed by ABN AMRO (Werdigier, 2007).
In the desire to thwart the hostile bid offered by RBS Consortium and
continue to be acquired by Barclays in order to maintain existing
friendly relations, ABN AMRO purportedly disposed off one of its North
American subsidiary, LaSalle Bank Corporation which Bank of America
agreed to buy for $21bn. Later RBS led consortium increases the cash
proportion to 93% followed by Barclay’s withdrawal from the battle and
approval of more than 86% of ABN AMRO’s shareholders (The Guardian, 2011);
RBS have won the bid after a contentious battle to acquire ABN AMRO
between Barclays and RBS for €72.27bn which was €10bn higher than bid
price offered by Barclays.
5
RBS decision making approach to acquire ABN AMRO
RBS management decided to follow a quick magical approach to acquire
ABN AMRO by considering the acquisition as an opportunity to avail at
any cost by challenging their assumptions. Management believed that
the assets of ABN AMRO will outweigh its acquisition costs and has
followed a holistic approach for the acquisition. Sir Fred Godwin, RBS
Chairman being dominant in his decision was committed to acquire ABN
AMRO at any cost which forced the bank to its knees (Wilson, 2011). Using
mind games, Sir Fred Godwin tried to continue with the acquisition by
being ambitious in the transaction that it will increase the market
share of RBS globally and will bring extraordinary business and profit
margins similar as the takeover of NATWEST which has brought huge
benefits to the bank (Pratley, 2011).
RBS decided to go for mergers and acquisitions using a hostile
takeover approach by using short-term debt strategy as it was facing
substantial credit risk and leverage problems (Leak, 2011). It has
6
followed an ambitious strategy to acquire ABN AMRO based on just two
lever arch folders and a CD. They considered the high asset valuation
and followed high risk high returns strategy where in fact the value
of ABN AMRO’s assets was toxic (Varma, 2011). Positive past experience of
National Bank of Westminster take over by RBS lead the management to
believe that the new acquisition will result in extraordinary growth
of the business and due diligence can be ignored (Pratley, 2011).
Critical Appraisal of RBS approach to acquire ABN AMRO
RBS followed a hostile takeover approach to acquire ABN AMRO. Not
always this approach proves to be successful, according to some
analysts, hostile takeover approach has severe effects on the economy
as they fail often. It sluggish growth due to the debt created by
takeover and results in layoffs upon consolidation (Grabianowski, n.d). In
order to thwart the potential takeover, ABN AMRO by taking ‘Crown
Jewels Defense’ approach sold off its one of the major business unit
LaSalle Bank to Bank of America for $21bn cash (Werdigier, 2007). This was
an early indication which triggers the potential acquisition deal may
turn out to be unsuccessful for RBS.
RBS Board decision to proceed with raising debt finance mainly short-
term rather than equity finance for ABN AMRO’s acquisition was unsafe
financing strategy which has reduced already lower Capital Ratio. Debt
finance approach was not indeed helpful as short term debt needs to be
paid within a short time period, expose the company as highly risky
for investors; increases vulnerability in tough times and the high
costs of loan repayment which includes principal and interest make it
complex for the growth of business (NFIB, 2013). RBS Short term debt
7
strategy was in fact poor decision by the management as its total
funding comprised of €22.6bn Cash Consideration and only €4.3bn RBS
Shares and the mass of the cash consideration around €12.3bn was
financed by short term debt with the maturity period of less than or
equal to 12 months (FSA Board Report, 2011).
Finance raised by RBS to fund ABN AMRO acquisition, as at 26 September 2007
€m %
Issue of new ordinary shares 4,281Total Equity Component 4,281
Preference shares 4,567 19%Other tier 1 securities 1,557 7%Senior funding 9,941 42%Bridge funding 7,400 32%
Total Cash Component 23,465 100%Cash funding required 22,600Cash funding surplus as at 26 September 2007 865
(Source: FSA Report, 2011)
Short term debt strategy has increased RBS reliance on Short term
wholesale funding (Treanor and Bowers, 2011). RBS use of non-sterling
wholesale finance has made it more vulnerable to disintegrate in
confidence and significant run on its finance (Leake, 2011).
Limited due diligence approach was not enough to consider the
potential acquisition in light of the level of acquisition and
ignoring all of the risks involved in cross jurisdictional
acquisition. RBS management doesn’t seems to be susceptible to the
customer’s importance and investor’s confidence and decided to proceed
with over optimistic strategy by acquiring ABN AMRO based on the
information provided in two lever arch folders and a CD (Monk, 2011). RBS
followed the investment advice given by Merrill Lynch which was highly
8
remunerated on the successful completion of the acquisition which
anyone can believe that it will not be independent due to the high
contingent fee attached to the transaction (Bowers and Treanor, 2011). Due
diligence helps the companies to classify and pick those options that
will bring real benefit to the company. Companies should refrain from
investing in a project without constructive due diligence results. Due
diligence is not a child’s play but it is fundamental. It assures to
deliver trustworthy assistance for decision making by conveying
information that can help to thwart mistakes or assist the company in
strategic move (Reinmoeller, 2013).
RBS decided to lead the consortium for the acquisition of ABN AMRO by
consolidating the whole of the target company in its financial
statements before any asset transfers to other partners. This decision
established vulnerabilities and doubts that were crucial to maintain
market confidence and these later introduced complications in RBS’s
liquidity status (FSA Report, 2011). Leading the consortium was a bad
decision as RBS already had high leverage and poor credit control and
this has exposed RBS to severe risks as anything that would go wrong
will first target towards RBS.
RBS over optimistic decision to follow past trends of hostile takeover
of NatWest in 2000 which present the company with extraordinary
surprises and huge market exposure was not proved to be a constructive
decision to acquire ABN AMRO. Management should have spotted flaws in
their judgment and have learned from past and industry examples where
hostile takeovers are not always successful (Pratley, 2011). Even rejecting
a hostile takeover has serious effects on the share prices for example
Yahoo’s opposition to Microsoft’s hostile takeovers has severely
reduces Yahoo’s share price from $118.75 to $6.78 after which no one
9
was interested in buying its stocks anymore due to the huge dropdown
in the share prices of Yahoo (FINWEB, 2013). Forward looking approach
would have helped RBS to analyze that following past trends doesn’t
deliver same results or the results might be obsolete in the upcoming
future.
Other Approaches Available For ABN AMRO Acquisition
RBS had several opportunities to finance ABN AMRO acquisition. As said
by Fekkes, a Senior Broker in Nashville, every lender has different
criteria for financing; buyer must pool ample time to analyze and
investigate all of the available options to make sure that the
proposed approach for financing is in fact appropriate for the
particular acquisition opportunity (Brown, 2011). RBS could have followed
an effective strategy or process of raising finance for the potential
acquisition by evaluating the pros and cons of several funding options
and taking into consideration a proper due diligence for the
prospective acquisition as to make sure that it will not lose its
investors and shareholders confidence in the later run and in fact the
transaction would come out to be a successful deal.
10
One of the options to finance acquisition was by raising equity
finance than debt finance. The acquisition time was heavily under the
economic crises where every step was risky for any business. Equity
finance is less risky than debt finance as it doesn’t need to pay back
to the investor. It enhances goodwill of the business and the ability
of the business to engage within investor’s network increases the
credibility of the business enterprise. Even equity finance ends up in
generating excess cash for the business which the company can later
invest in a lucrative project. The investors don’t expect their
11
Source: Mercantile Mergers and Acquisitions
returns in short term and perceive long term approach which would not
be the case in debt finance where investor demands the principal and
interest according to the contractual terms (The Seattle Small Business Lawyer,
2012). Raising equity can be a better option for the company if it is
not able to bear additional debt which was the case in RBS. The
company already had low capital ratio and high leverage; any
additional debt was a riskier option.
Acquisition brings considerable risks to the company that needs to be
identified and managed properly which could be avoided with pre-
acquisition due diligence of the target company. Over-estimation of
synergies and deals based on impractical development target often led
acquirers to continue with acquisitions despite of incomplete
information. Due diligence assists in identifying financial analysis,
challenge synergy and evaluate risks attached with the acquisition. A
proper due diligence review discovers prospective operational
improvements, maximizing revenue, savings in costs, restructuring
opportunities, optimizations of capital and effective utilization of
assets. Therefore, a pre-acquisition due diligence review uncover
unknown values and other issues that may encourage the acquirer to
follow more aggressive approach towards acquisition (PWC, 2013). RBS
relies on improper due diligence of ABN AMRO acquisition and proceed
with the transaction by shut eyes which has resulted in business
failure of RBS (J. R, 2011).
12
Appropriate Decision Making and Problem Solving Techniques for ABN AMRO Acquisition
RBS could have followed logical approach to decision making instead of
magical approach. This approach is historically tested and even now
majority of the companies follow this approach in order to analyze all
of the risks and rewards attached to the transaction. There are a
number of analyses under logical approach which RBS could have used
before making final acquisition decision for ABN AMRO.
13
Logical approaches are process based and comprised of steps which
facilitate the decision makers at every step closer towards the
transaction in order to reassure the decision maker about the
decision. For example, RBS management would have considered decision
tree analysis, Value for money analysis to make sure that the funds
invested for the acquisition will outweigh its benefits, gearing
analysis as RBS was already in leverage.
Implementation Method
Companies struggle to convert the implementation theory into action
strategy that will facilitate the plan to be effectively executed and
continued. Many organizations have strategies but very few of them
actually achieve it. According to Times 1000 study, only 14% out of
80% directors who have right plans believed that they were
implementing it (Cobbold and Lawrie, 2001).
RBS management should have followed a proper decision making process
from first identifying the problem than to evaluate the decision
criteria than to implement the decision and finally evaluate the
decision after implementing it.
14
Rational Decision Making Model
Identifying the Problem RBS management need to examine why
they wants to acquire ABN AMRO and
analyze RBS current business
problems (i.e. leverage problems,
lower capital ratio, etc).Establish Decision Criteria RBS management must decide on what
basis they will progress with the
takeover of ABN AMRO? RBS board
15
would consider Due Diligence
Reviews, Cost Benefit Analysis and
Value for Money Analysis to
support their decision. Whether to
raise debt or equity finance? Weigh Decision Criteria Leadership of RBS Chairman and
decision evaluation by other board
members and shareholders would
have examined the benefits to go
ahead with the transaction. Will
the acquisition costs of ABN AMRO
outweigh its benefits? Results of
logical approach to decision
making will be the best proof to
weigh the decision. Generate Alternatives What other options are available
to RBS to acquire ABN AMRO? Equity
finance then debt finance would
have been ideal as it doesn’t
needs to pay back within a short
period of time. Private equity
finance or public equity finance?Evaluate the Alternatives Due to the circumstances
surrounding at the time of ABN
AMRO takeover, such as economic
crises, alternatives to finance
the acquisition would have
supported to go ahead with raising
public equity instead of short
16
term debt finance as RBS had
liquidity problems and any
increase in debt will threaten
going concern problems at the time
of crises. Choose the Best Alternatives By selecting to fund the takeover
by public equity, RBS would have
arranged to proceed further with
acquiring ABN AMRO. Implement the Decision RBS finally acquire ABN AMRO by
evaluating the risks and rewards
of the transaction at the earlier
stage. Evaluate the Decision After completing the transaction,
RBS board must evaluate how
effective their decision was in
the acquisition as it will
facilitate in future mergers and
acquisitions.
By following a logical approach to decision making; though being rigid
and time consuming, RBS would have analyzed the pros and cons of
acquiring ABN AMRO before acquisition as it would have saved the bank
to face a huge business failure. It was the biggest mistake for a huge
bank to go ahead with a magical approach for takeover without clear
understanding of the risks attached to the transaction. As RBS failure
was one of the biggest shocks for the banking industry, Andrew Tyrie,
Conservative Chairman of the FSA Committee Report into the collapse of
RBS said, city’s culture is altering in a way that another tragedy 17
like RBS is least probable, banks have learned a lesson and the frame
of mind is changing deeply (Treanor, 2012).
References
Brown, C. M., 2011. How to finance an acquisition. [Online]
Available at: <http://www.inc.com/guides/201101/business-
acquisition-financing_pagen_2.html > (Accessed 6th November,
2013).
Bowers, S. and Treanor, J., 2011. RBS gamble on ABN AMRO deal:
FSA. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/dec/12/rbs-abn-amro-
fsa-report> (Accessed 2nd November, 2013).
Cobbold, I., 2001. Why do only one third of UK companies realize
significant strategic success? [Pdf] Available at:
18
<2gc.eu/files/resources/2GC-WP-UKCoStratSuc-090311.pdf> (Accessed 7th
November 2013).
Fin Web, 2013. Gauging the impact of hostile takeover on stock
value. The Financial Web. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.finweb.com/investing/gauging-the-impact-of-a-hostile-
takeover-on-stock-values.html#axzz2ng3UtESO> (Accessed 4th
November, 2013).
FSA Report, 2012. The FSA report into the failure of RBS. [Pdf]
Available at:
<www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/.../640/640.pdf> (Accessed
9th November, 2013).
Grabianowski, E., 2013. How hostile takeovers work. [Online]
Available at: <http://money.howstuffworks.com/hostile-
takeover4.htm> (Accessed 4th November, 2013).
Hammond, J. S, Keeney, R. L and Raiffa, H., 2006. [Online]
Available at: <http://hbr.org/2006/01/the-hidden-traps-in-
decision-making/ar/1> (Accessed 4th November, 2013).
J. R., 2011. The ice was thinner than it seemed. The Economist.
[Online] Available at:
<http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2011/12/royal-bank-
scotland-0> (Accessed 1st November, 2013).
19
La times, 2007. Barclays to acquire rival ABN AMRO. Los Angeles
Times. [Online] Available at:
<http://articles.latimes.com/2007/apr/24/business/fi-banks24 >
(Accessed 1st November, 2013).
Lambert, R., 2011. RBS is a catalogue of disastrous decisions.
The Financial Times. [Online] Available at: <http://blogs.ft.com/the-
a-list/2011/12/12/#axzz2oRxYkTeY (Accessed 1st November, 2013).
Leake, S. J., 2011. Why did Royal Bank of Scotland fail? The FSA
speaks. [Online] Available at:
<http://about.bloomberglaw.com/law-reports/scotland/> (Accessed
2nd November, 2013).
Mercantile Mergers and Acquisitions, 2013. Private equity
financing. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.mercantilemergersacquisitions.com/corporate-finance/p
rivate-equity-financing.html> (Accessed 7th November, 2013).
Monk, E., 2011. RBS failure due to ‘light touch’ rules and poor
decisions- but no more action against Fred ‘the shred’ Goodwin.
[Online] Available at:
<http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-2073021/RBS-
failure-light-touch-rules-poor-decisions--action-Fred-shred-
Goodwin.html> (Accessed 5th November, 2013).
20
NFIB, 2013. Debt Vs Equity Financing: Which is the best way for
your business to access capital? [Online] Available at:
<http://www.nfib.com/business-resources/business-resources-item?
cmsid=50036> (Accessed 5th November, 2013).
Pratley, N., 2011. What was RBS board thinking when it backed ABN
AMRO takeover? It wasn’t. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2011
/dec/12/what-rbs-board-thinking-abn-amro> (Accessed 2nd November,
2013).
PWC, 2013. Due Diligence. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.pwc.com/sg/en/advisory/due-diligence.jhtml >
(Accessed 7th November, 2013).
Reinmoeller, P., 2013. Technical notes: due diligence and bias:
dealing with the unintended consequences of a concept’s success.
[Online] Available at:
<http://www.fm-magazine.com/feature/depth/due-diligence-and-bias-
dealing-unintended-consequences-concept%E2%80%99s-success#
>(Accessed 2nd November, 2013).
Robinson, M., 2012. RBS acquisition of ABN AMRO: Bad decision,
bad timing or the Fred effect? [Online] Available at:
<http://fn0363michaelrobinson.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/rbs-
acquisition-of-abn-amro-bad.html> (Accessed 1st November, 2013).
21
The Guardian, 2012. RBS Collapse: Timeline. The Guardian. [Online]
Available at:
<http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/dec/12/rbs-collapse-
timeline> (Accessed 7th November, 2013).
Treanor, J. and Bowers, S., 2011. RBS failure caused by multiple
poor decisions. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.theguardian.com/global/2011/dec/12/royal-bank-of-
scotland-fsa-report> (Accessed 3rd November, 2013).
Treanor, J., 2012. Regulator should have stopped RBS from buying
ABN AMRO, say MPs. [Online] Available at:
<http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/oct/19/regulator-rbs-
abn-amro-financial-services-authority> (Accessed 6th November,
2013).
The Seattle Small Business Lawyer, 2012. Debt Vs Equity (Post 1):
Advantages and disadvantages of equity funding. [Online]
Available at: <http://www.seattlesmallbizlawyer.com/debt-vs-
equity-post-1-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-equity-funding/>
(Accessed 6th November, 2013).
Varma, J., 2011. RBS and ABN AMRO due diligence. [Online]
Available at: <http://jrvarma.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/rbs-and-
abn-amro-due-diligence/> (Accessed 2nd November, 2013).
Werdigier, J., 2007. ABN AMRO to be acquired for $91 Billion. The
New York Times. [Online] Available at:
22
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/24/business/24bankcnd.html?
pagewanted=all&_r=0> (Accessed 2nd November, 2013).
Wilson, H., 2011. Royal Bank of Scotland collapse: the 10 questions the FSA must answer. [Online] Available at: <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8933151/Royal-Bank-of-Scotland-collapse-the-10-questions-the-FSA-must-answer.html> (Accessed 3rd November, 2013).
23