Pakistan's Sugar Economy:
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Pakistan's Sugar Economy:
Pakistan’s Sugar Economy:
A facts based presentation
Presented by:
Pakistan Sugar Mills Association
2nd March, 2020
Sugar Cane – A high value cash crop
Source: PSMA, Economic surveys of Pakistan
65%
25%
10%
Punjab Sindh KPK
Area Under Cultivation
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Sugar Cane Plantation Area, Value of Crop
Area Value of Crop RHS
Mn Ha Pkr Bn
Average value of sugar cane crop grown in Pakistan
PKR 300+ Billion
5%: Sugarcane area versus total cultivated land of Pakistan
Source: PSMA, * estimated based on sugar production of 5.4mn tons for 2019 ,**based on 82 functional Sugar Mills
Pakistan Sugar Industry Highlights
Average Crushing Capacity
7,300TCD**
Directly Employed:
100k+
Indirectly Dependent:
1+ MillionHouse holds
Direct and indirect taxesPkr50-60bn per year*
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
India
Brazil
EU-28
Thailand
China
USA
Pakistan
Russian Fed.
Mexico
Australia
TOP 10 Sugar Producers 2018(million metric tons)
0 5 10 15 20 25
India
EU-28
China
Brazil
USA
Indonesia
Russian Fed.
Pakistan
Mexico
Egypt, Arab Rep.
TOP 10 Sugar Consumers 2018(million metric tons)
Ranked 8th in the World
21.3 11.0
3.1 1.6 1.6 1.6
1.2 0.9 0.6 0.6
- 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Brazil
Thailand
Australia
Guatemala
EU-28
Mexico
Pakistan
India
Colombia
Ukraine
TOP 10 Net-Exporters 2018(million metric tons)
Ranked 7th in the World
Source: ISO Sugar Year Book 2019, Tables are on a calendar year basis
Ranked 7th in the World
Pakistan sugar in global perspective
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
kgs)
World Per Capita Consumption of Sugar 2018
Source: PSMA, Economic Surveys of Pakistan
The journey to self-sufficiency
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
82
00
4-0
5
20
05
-06
20
06
-07
20
07
-08
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
20
12
-13
20
13
-14
20
14
-15
20
15
-16
20
16
-17
20
17
-18
20
18
-19
Mill
ion
Met
ric
Ton
s
Domestic Sugar Production & Consumption
Production Consumption
From 2010-11, Pakistan is consistently producing surplus sugar
The export of this surplus sugar earned the country roughly $2.3 billion in these 9 years by exporting six million tons of sugar to the world
Progress but not at the cost of other crops
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Are
a (H
a)
Cotton Sugarcane Rice Maize
Sugarcane has not contributed towards reduction in planted area of any other important crop of Pakistan
Source: Economic Surveys of Pakistan 2018-19, (P) Provisional
Cotton-421K
Rice+585K
Maize+383K
Sugarcane+2K
From 2012-13 to 2018-19: Rice +501K, Cotton -561K, Maize +258K, Sugarcane -27K
Area Under Important Crops (000 Ha)
Source: The Guardian , ISMA (Indian Sugar Mills Association, Paper titled “Sugar Industry is water efficient”
Sugar cane compares well with other crops on water
Paddy 325mm
Cotton 150mm
Soybean 150mm
Sugar Cane 150mm
Jowar 100mm
Monthly Water Consumption By Crops
Cotton 10,000Lts
Groundnut 3,100Lts
Rice 2,500-3,400Lts
Sugar 1,500-2,000Lts
Water Required Per Kg of Output
Sugar Industry is net generator of water
For every tonne of cane crushed, 700Lts of water
is generated
500Lts is used in factory sugar
processing
Remaining 200Lts is given
back for irrigation, after due treatment
Total carbon and water footprint of sugarcane up to point of consumptionis much less than other crops that require further processing
Source: PSMA, SBP
Third largest export sector of Pakistan in 2017-18 & 2018-19Export Revenues from Sugar and Ethanol only lagged behind Textiles and Rice in FY2017-18 and FY2018-19
28
529
287 322
132 161
508
223 159
90
313 254
220
280
387
406
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Sugar Ethanol Ethanol Avg Price RHS Sugar Avg Price RHS
188mn
619mn 601mn 576mn
352mn
441mn
895mn
629mn
USD mnSugar Price – USD cents/kg
Ethanol Price – USD cents/Liter
Depreciation of rupee has increased export potential of sugar
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
Monthly International White Sugar Prices (US$/Ton)2006-2020
International Sugar Prices (US$/Ton)
Current cost $375
With a stronger rupee, Pakistan sugar wasable to compete in global market only 60%of the time. However, now we expect that itwill be competitive 90% of the time, if caneprices are not increased
At cane price of Rs.190:• Above US$375 (70% of evaluated
period), Pakistan is competitive in theworld market and the industry canexport in excess of 1.5 Million tons peryear if in surplus
• With international market between US$325-375 (22% of evaluated period),Pakistan sugar is only competitive inAfghanistan, due to freight advantages,and China due to preferential tariffs. Thequantity expected is around half amillion tons and realized ex-mill pricearound $375-$425
• Below $325, it is not viable for Pakistansugar mills to export to any marketSource: investing.com (London #5), *as of February 28, 2020
Current International Price $396.6*
• Most of the production growth has come from increased sugar production per hectare and only moderately from increase in area
• Economics of the industry has improved significantly due to:
− Sugar yield
− Ethanol (through molasses price)
− Power cogeneration (through bagasse price)
− Scale (Production of sugar per mill)Capacity utilization has dramatically increased as increased cane supply has resulted in longer seasons
Sugar Production in Pakistan
2009-10 2016-17 Increase
Sugarcane Area (Hectares)
942,870 1,225,000 30%
Total Sugar Production
(MMT)3.14 7.05 125%
Sugar Yield(Tons/Hectare)
3.33 5.79 74%
Functional Sugar Mills
80 82 3%
Avg. Sugar Production per
mill (Tons)39,250 85,975 119%
Revolution in 8 years
Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan, PSMA
Source: PSMA, ASMC
Potential for becoming a major sugar exporter
• Productivity is still low as compared to majorsugar exporting countries but Pakistan’ssugar industry has been on the right pathand there is still a lot of room to keepimproving if the economics remains positive
• Current export potential of sugar andethanol is US$ 1 billion
Potential in 5 Years:
Without any increase in historical acreage andinputs usage, improving yields to 8 Tons/Ha,Pakistan can potentially raise sugar productionto 9mln tons, and if 2000MW of electricityexport can be achieved, sugar industry can havea combined annual balance of trade impact of
US$ 3 billion• Including US$ 2 billion in direct exports
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
20
12
-13
20
13
-14
20
14
-15
20
15
-16
20
16
-17
20
17
-18
20
18
-19
20
19
-20
20
20
-21
20
21
-22
20
22
-23
20
23
-24
Yie
ld (
Ton
s/H
a)
Year
Pakistan’s Sugar Yields (2008-2019)
Tons of sugar per harvested hectare
Projected Trendline
Australia’s Yield: 12.35 T/Ha X
Current Trendline
3.05 T/Ha
5.79 T/Ha
Brazil’s Yield: 9-10 T/Ha X
Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan
Net sugar price is still below its retail price which was prevalent 8-10 years ago. In the meanwhile, sugarcane support price has been more than doubled by the provincial governments
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Perc
enta
ge o
f P
rice
Incr
ease
Retail price trend of essential commodities in Pakistan
Wheat Flour Veg. Ghee Sugar Fresh Milk Basmati Rice
Local sugar prices still lower than 9 years ago
Source: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
Sugar retail price 10 years range between Rs50/kg to Rs90/kgRs/kg
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan
-10
May
-10
Sep
-10
Jan
-11
May
-11
Sep
-11
Jan
-12
May
-12
Sep
-12
Jan
-13
May
-13
Sep
-13
Jan
-14
May
-14
Sep
-14
Jan
-15
May
-15
Sep
-15
Jan
-16
May
-16
Sep
-16
Jan
-17
May
-17
Sep
-17
Jan
-18
May
-18
Sep
-18
Jan
-19
May
-19
Sep
-19
Jan
-20
Monthly sugar retail prices/kg Rs/kg
Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan
Sugar has been losing its importance in consumer budgets
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
wheat flour and gur retail prices/kg as a % of sugar retail prices/kg
Wheat Flour Gur (Sup. Qlty)
Weak Linkage between Cane and Sugar Prices
Source: PSMA, Economic survey of Pakistan 2018-19 provisional data
47%
57%
63%
51%
45%48%
57% 58%
40%
31% 32% 32%35% 36%
30%32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Cane Min. Price (CMP)/40kg Sugar Avg. Retail Price/kg Retail Price % Of CMP (RHS)
Over the years, ratio of sugar retail price as compared to cane minimum price has decreased considerably
Retail prices are usually Rs.5 to 8 more than ex-factory rates
From 2003-04 till 2011-12, sugar retail prices were 52% of cane minimum price on average
This ratio fell to between 30-35% in the surplus years
Sugar in Pakistan(Million Metric Tons)
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Production 7.05 6.6 5.2 4.9*
Consumption 5.10 5.2 5.2 5.2*
Export 0.50 1.95 0.8 0.0*
Carryover(at start of new
season) 1.66 1.3 0.5 0.2*
Source: PSMA, *Estimates
Industry Outlook – Balanced
• The return to a more balancedsituation in terms of demand andsupply is creating a viablesituation for farmers and industry
• 2019-20 production is expected tobe lower by about 10% butexpected to rebound in 2020-21due to high cane prices prevailing
• In a challenged economy, PSMAexpects demand for sugar to beflat to negative
• If the government takes a prudentview of the situation, Pakistancan return to being a regularexporter of sugar
Cost of production of Sugar for 2019-20 season
Source: PSMA
Cost Summary including net profit margin %age
Cost of sugarcane 48.48 58.0%
Overheads net of all by-products 12.90 15.4%
Sales tax, income tax & withholding taxes 15.20 18.2%
WPPF & WWF 0.57 0.7%
Net profit margin 6.44 7.7%
83.59 100%
Major Assumptions Unit ValuesInstalled capacity TCD 8,000
Capacity utilized %age 80%
Crushing days Days 100
Sugarcane price Rs./40 kg 190
Sucrose recovery %age 10.00%
Molasses recovery %age 4.25%
Molasses price Rs/ton 12,000
Cost Summary including net profit margin Rs/Kg %age
Cost of sugarcane 48.48 58.0%
Overheads net of all by-products 12.90 15.4%Sales tax, income tax & withholding taxes 15.20 18.2%
WPPF & WWF 0.57 0.7%
Net profit margin 6.44 7.7%
83.59 100%
75%-80% of sugar production costs are determined directly by the federal and provincial governments
Cost of production of Sugar for 2019-20 season
Source: PSMA
Cost Summary including net profit margin Rs/Kg %age
Cost of sugarcane 61.55 61.7%
Overheads net of all by-products 13.91 13.9%Sales tax, income tax & withholding taxes 17.61 17.6%
WPPF & WWF 0.54 0.5%
Net profit margin 6.20 6.2%
99.81 100%
Major Assumptions Unit ValuesInstalled capacity TCD 8,000
Capacity utilized %age 80%
Crushing days Days 90
Sugarcane price* Rs./40 kg 230
Sucrose recovery %age 9.50%
Molasses recovery %age 4.25%
Molasses price Rs/ton 15,000
Cost Summary including net profit margin %age
Cost of sugarcane 48.48 58.0%
Overheads net of all by-products 12.90 15.4%
Sales tax, income tax & withholding taxes 15.20 18.2%
WPPF & WWF 0.57 0.7%
Net profit margin 6.44 7.7%
83.59 100%
Major Assumptions Unit ValuesInstalled capacity TCD 8,000
Capacity utilized %age 80%
Crushing days Days 100
Sugarcane price Rs./40 kg 190
Sucrose recovery %age 10.00%
Molasses recovery %age 4.25%
Molasses price Rs/ton 12,000
Cost Summary including net profit margin Rs/Kg %age
Cost of sugarcane 48.48 58.0%
Overheads net of all by-products 12.90 15.4%Sales tax, income tax & withholding taxes 15.20 18.2%
WPPF & WWF 0.57 0.7%
Net profit margin 6.44 7.7%
83.59 100%
*Expected cost of sugarcane for
season 2019-20
83
86
87
113
119
131
142
161
- 50 100 150 200
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
India
Thailand
Bangladesh
China
Indonesia
Philipines
Despite highest % GST, Pakistan has lowest retail sugar price in the region
Retail Sugar Prices/kg in different Countries as on Feb 07, 2020*
Pakistan 17%
Sri Lanka 15%
Bangladesh 15%
China 13%
Philipine 12%
Indonesia 10%
Thailand 7%
India 5%
GST on Sugar
By maintaining average correlation between cane minimum price and sugar retail price i.e. 52%, from 2003-04 till 2011-12, Retail Sugar Prices in Pakistan
should be 94Rs/kg that make us stand between India and Thailand
Source: Business Recorder, SBP, sunsirs.com, chinimandi.com, USDA, cbsl.gov, dhakatribune.com, sra.gov.ph, globalprice.info, avalara.com, psa.gov.ph
Sugar Retail Prices are Converted into Pkr/kg
Country Currency Pkr Equivalent
Philipine 1 Peso 3.05
Indonesia (April 4'19) 1 IDR 0.01
China 1 CNY 22.10
Sri Lanka 1 LKR 0.85
India 1 INR 2.16
Thailand (Dec 12'19) 1 BHT 5.14
Bangladesh (Jan 4'20) 1 BDT 1.83
*Currency Exchange rates as on Feb 07, 2020
Market disruptions by the Federal and Provincial Governments
• Despite increasing prices but balanced to surplus supply, sugar sales have been slow since June 2019 giventhe push by the Government to increase regulatory oversight of the economy:
I. CNIC Condition: The Government now requires sugar mills to obtain CNIC numbers of buyers.
Approximately 72% of sugar sales in the domestic market are made to unregistered parties i.e.small traders, non-regulated segment of the economy who are not willing to provide theiridentification (CNICs)
II. Axle Load Restrictions: The NHA has reduced Axle Load approximately by 50% which has
resulted in increased costs of transportation
III. Administrative actions by provincial governments: Since June 2018, Punjab Government
has consistently notified a sugar retail price which was Rs.5-10 below the market and used it as anexcuse to harass and arrest shopkeepers and wholesalers of sugar. Other provinces are starting tofollow suit.
• Traders / investors / retailers have started to step back in large numbers from doing sugar business at atime when sugar mills must sell sugar to pay to growers
• These administrative actions have contributed to a slowdown in sugar sales and also a reduction in theamount of sugar in the pipeline. It is critical that Federal and Provincial Governments should take arealistic view of market realities to ensure ample supply of sugar to the masses
Suggested Way Forward – Near Term1. Sales TaxThe imposition of sales tax at 17% on sugar is an extremely harsh act in a country where sugar is considered an essentialand sensitive food item. This is the highest rate ever imposed in the history of Pakistan.
PSMA requests that sales tax on sugar be brought down to zero in line with other essential food items such aswheat flour, milk, vegetables and fruits. This will give relief of over Rs.11/Kg on price of sugar to the masses.
2. Mark up rates on financing for sugar millsThe industry crushes sugarcane for 3-4 months but has to hold and sell the sugar over 12 months. When coupled withrequirement of provincial governments to pay the farmers within 15 days of crushing cane, it can only be achieved byheavy borrowing from the banks through pledge of sugar. Increased mark up rates have added roughly Rs.3 to Rs.4/Kg incost of sugar.
PSMA requests that being an agricultural industry, cost of long term borrowing should be set by the state bankin line with LTFF on long term financing and for working capital it should be equal to export refinance.
3. Government should maintain strategic reserves of sugarThere is a natural cycle in agriculture where price changes lead to amplified production changes, exacerbating thesituation. Theory, logic and practice, all recommend that the government help reduce the volatility in essential food itemprices by keeping strategic reserves.
PSMA recommends that the Federal and Provincial Governments together hold about half a million tons ofsugar as strategic reserve. This previous practice was very valuable for price stabilization when Pakistan didnot have sufficient production in its history.
Suggested Way Forward – Near Term
4. Cost of production model should be agreed between PSMA and Government
There are many misunderstandings at the Federal and Provincial Governments with respect to sugar production and itscosts. These misunderstandings have very detrimental impact when sugar retail prices or minimum cane support pricesare being determined at the Federal or Provincial levels.
PSMA requests that the effort initiated by the Sugar Advisory Board to determine a cost production model forthe Pakistani Sugar Industry be completed as soon as possible.
Policy changes needed in the medium-term
Ministry of National Food Security/Ministry of Industries/Provinces
1. Rethinking archaic provincial rules and regulations regarding sugar industry:The Sugar Cane Act (nearly 70 years old) as implemented in all the provinces is archaic and a complete misfit for theneeds of the time. Provincial Governments over time have stopped following the majority of provisions themselves andoften arbitrarily pick and choose from the Act as well as associated rules and procedures that have been amendedcountless times. Often times businesses and farmers are not even clear on what applies to them and what doesn’t.
There is also an extremely important commercial aspect to this issue as a Minimum Cane Support Price based on the Actis still being announced and enforced by the provincial governments without the necessary commercial aspects(including price of sugar) addressed for the sugar industry.
Work needs to be urgently started on simplifying and modernizing the provincial rules and regulationsregarding the sugar industry by building consensus on deregulation with the provinces at the Federal level
Policy changes needed in the medium term
Ministry of Power
1. Consistent Power Purchase Policy for Sugar Mills:Currently only about 10 mills are selling about 200 MW to the national grid with pending agreements in the doldrumsfor another 384 MW.
Benefits of Bagasse outweigh almost every other fuel possible for power generation as it is not only indigenous andrenewable fuel just like wind and solar but also additionally base load (available consistently), agriculture based (whilenot taking away any area from a food crop) and well distributed across major load areas.
Bagasse should be made an essential part of the future energy policies of the country particularly theupcoming Renewable and Alternative Energy Policy.
Furthermore, as surplus generation capacity exists in some sugar mills, CPP (Cogeneration Power Policy) atappropriate tariffs should be continued for the benefit of the country
Given the right incentives, within 2-3 years sugar industry could cross 2000 MW in installed capacity. The benefits to theeconomy of Pakistan, particularly the agriculture sector are innumerable. Particularly if the majority of the industry canavail of this revenue stream, it will have a noticeable effect on reducing the price of sugar.