Optimizing Gas Turbine Bearing Vibration Using 2D D’Alembert’s Equation
Transcript of Optimizing Gas Turbine Bearing Vibration Using 2D D’Alembert’s Equation
OPTIMIZING GAS TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION USING 2-D D’ALEMBERT’S
EQUATION
By
ABSTRACT
The ability to identify faulty equipment under severe
conditions allows the manufacturers and operators to take
appropriate proactive measures to rectify the faults and
provide an assessment for early detection of the engine defects
that could lead to catastrophic failure. This work therefore
shows that such counter measures can be carried out by
optimization, modeling, simulation or using a reliable analysis
of gas turbine engine, rotor shaft and bearing vibration data
through 2-Dimensional D‟Alembert‟s equation. Gas turbine
plants on industrial duty for electricity generation were thus
used to actualize the research. The data for vibration
amplitude of rotor bearings from the reference engine which
varied between 0.19 and 3.81 mm/s were compared with those
obtained from a failed engine of similar characteristics just
before failure and used for the simulation and modeling. The
given engine speed and active load were also determined as
falling between 7264 rpm to 7436 rpm and 10 MW to 20 MW
respectively. A well packaged computer program code-named
“MELBF” written in C++ programming language was
developed. The results show that the machine should not be
run beyond 3.81 mm/s vibration amplitude in order to avoid
resonance and downtime of the engine.
Keywords: 2-D D’Alembert’s Equation, Bearing Vibration,
Catastrophic failure, Modeling and Simulation,
Optimization, Proactive Vibration Monitoring,
Rotor Shaft Faults.
___________________________________
NOMENCLATURE
k = Shaft stiffness constant (kN.m/rad)
ω = Engine rotational speed (rad/sec)
ωn = Natural frequency (rpm)
M = Lumped mass of shaft (kg)
.x = Vibration velocity amplitude
( mm/s)
C = Damping coefficient/constant of bearing
in translation (kN. s/m)
Fo =Forcing function at initial frequency (N)
..x = Vibration acceleration displacement (mm/s2)
X= Vibration displacement amplitude (mm)
N = Cycle per minute (rpm)
Cc = Critical damping coefficient constant
ξ = Damping ratio
m = Infinitesimal mass (g) causing Eccentricity (e)
e = Eccentricity (mm)
ψ , h (v) = Arbitrary function
= Phase angle
T = frequency (rpm)
ρ = mass per unit length (kg/m)
F(t)= Inertia force
1. INTRODUCTION
Gas turbine (GT) engines when in operation are mainly
affected by rotor shaft faults such as unbalance, misalignment,
looseness, distortion, bearing vibration and eccentric journal
etc (Ogbonnaya, 2009). Ability to identify faulty components
under severe condition allows the users and operators to take
appropriate proactive measures to rectify the faults and
Ezenwa A. Ogbonnaya*
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Micheal Okpara University of Agriculture,
Umudike-Umuahaia, Nigeria.
Email: [email protected]
Kombo Theophilus-Johnson
Department of Marine Engineering,
Rivers State Univesity of Science and
Technology, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
Email: [email protected]
Hyginus U. Ugwu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Micheal Okpara University of Agriculture,
Umudike-Umuahaia, Nigeria.
Email: [email protected]
Peter B. Forsman
Department of Welding, Oil and Gas
Engineering, Petroleum Training Institute,
Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria.
Email: [email protected]
Charles U. Orji
Department of Marine Engineering,
Rivers State Univesity of Science and
Technology, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
Email: [email protected]
*Corresponding Author: E.A Ogbonnaya, 0803-777-8406,
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012 GT2012
June 11-15, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark
GT2012-68213
1 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
provide an assessment for early detection of the engine faults
that could lead to catastrophic failure (Carter, 1993).
However, vibration analysis has been used in fault diagnosis
and in the view of Mobley (1999), it is suitable for application
in rotating machines with rolling bearing for decades.
Recently, evidence has placed vibration condition monitoring
technique as one of the best amongst non- destructive
techniques as it provides greater and more effective
maintenance programme with large cost benefits to industry
(Luo et al., 2000; Ahmadi and Mollazade, 2009). Vibration
analysis in particular has for some time been used as a
predictive maintenance procedure and as a support for
scheduling machinery maintenance periodicity (Ogbonnaya
2004; Ahmadi and Mollazade 2009).
According to Azovtsev et al (1997), the wear mechanisms
primarily made up of sliding and rubbing for element of
bearing such as inner race, outer race or balls wear can be
represented by an increase in vibration amplitude and a narrow
band region of increasing energy content in the frequency
spectrum. An evident offset of the spectrum from the baseline
of zero amplitude may also provide an indication of wear of
the bearing elements. Figure 1 shows a sectional/pictorial view
of a defective and a normal journal bearing.
1.1 Other Approaches/Techniques
1) Hyunchual and Shen (2009) presented an approach on
mode evolution of asymmetric rotor assembled to
flexible bearing and housing. Two mathematical criteria
were used to identify balance modes.
2) Tachung and Kai-Shang (2009) dealt specifically on
identification of speed-dependent bearing coefficients
from unbalanced responses in one test run. In that work,
second order polynomials were assumed to fit the
bearing coefficients from where unbalance
measurements were made at several rotating speeds in
that speed range to solve for the polynomial
coefficients.
3) A diagnozing and prognozing approach of GT rotor
shaft faults was carried out in Ogbonnaya (2009). In
that work, a method of computer application in visual-
basic programming language was suggested. A
software named MICE was also used for the analysis.
Fig. 1: A sectional view of defective and normal journa l bearing (Meier-Peter, 2009): Indian Exporters’ Guide, (2012)
1.2 Approach Used in this Work
This paper provides a comprehensive optimization of GT rotor
bearing vibration using D‟Alembert‟s solution. A program
code-named MELBF written in C++ programming language
was used to bring it to fruition. MELBF stands for Misaligned,
Eccentricity, Loose Bearing, Failure. It further provides a
detailed description of these phenomenon/threats and their
2 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
consequences. Also this present work looked at general
bearing faults that could be detected with vibration monitoring
(Barkov and Barkova, 1995).
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The method adopted in this work is through the use of
D‟Alembert‟s solution as to further express the problems of
vibration. Generally, D‟Alembert‟s principle is a method to
convert a dynamic system into an equivalent static system by
adding the inertia force, taken in the reverse direction to the
restoring forces (Sadhu, 2006). For the type of system shown
in figure 2, the principle states that
..xM + C + kx = F(t) 1
Fig. 2: Damped vibration system Thomson, (1972)
2.1 Derivation of D’Alembert’s Solution for partial
differential equation
According to Kreyzig (2010) and Saeed (2010),
2x
u 2 2C
2t
u 2
2
where ρ
T 2C
The wave equation can be immediately obtained by
transferring equation 2 in a suitable way namely, by
introducing the new independent variables. Hence,
ct x z ,ct' x v 3
Then u becomes a function of v and z. The derivatives in
equation 2 can now be expressed in terms of derivations with
respect to v and z.
Denoting partial derivations by subscripts such that 1 vx
and 1 z x For simplicity t x,u becomes
zvxzxvx u u zu v u u 4
zzvzvv
xzzvxvzvzvxx
u 2u u
z u u v u u xu u u
5
Similarly equation 2 can be transformed in the same procedure
finding
u u 2 u c u zzvzvvtt2 6
By inserting these into results, we get
0 v z
u2 vzU
7
Obviously, the point of the present method is that the resulting
equation 7 can be readily solved by two successive
integrations.
Hence,
v h v
u
v z
u 2
8
where v h is an arbitrary function of v, and so
z Ψ dν v h u 9
where z is also an arbitrary function of z. Since the
integral is a function of v, say, ϕ(v)
The solution u is of the form z v u relating to
equation 3, we have
ct - x Ψ ct x φ t x,u 10
Equation 10 is called second order D‟ALembert‟s solution of
the wave equation 2.
GT rotor bearing when in operation is subjected to forced
harmonic motion as is usually modeled in the spring-mass-
damper system. From equation 3, we can assume the
following in equation (10) and advance to what is stated in
(Sadhu, 2006). See equation (1).
Thus from the elementary modeled form, the reversed inertia
force is..xM , the restoring forces acting on the object are
.xC
and spring force Kx in which equation 10 can be translated and
assumed as shown below
W
f (t)
W
K
M M
C K
x
C
M
3 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
f(t) ct - x Ψ ct xφ t x,u 11
Also recall from equation (1)
..xM + C + kx = F(t)
Thus, the steady state solution of equation 11 yields
M
e m
nω
ω 2ξ
22
nω
ω1
2
nω
ω
X
12
Equation 12 was used to develop a program named MEBLF
written in C++ programming language. A flow chart drawn
from equation 12 is shown in figure 3. It is a single loop flow
chart with two subroutines to convert N to and X to The
vibration readings from the test engines were taken in units of
displacement amplitude. The actual and theoretical data
collected were statistically analyzed as shown in table 1. The
link between D‟Alembert‟s solution and equation 1 is thus
shown in equation 11. Hence why it was possible to use
equation 12 for the simulation in this work.
2.2 Instrumentations and Test Equipment
The data used in the various aspects of this work were
collected from an operational H25 GT (Delta Unit 5) plant on
industrial duty for electricity generation. The plant is located
in Ughelli, Delta State of Nigeria. The various locations of the
bearings along the shaft line are shown in Appendix A while a
typical print-out/screen capture from the equipment is shown
in Appendix B. The most important operating data/parameters
considered were those of vibration amplitude and turbine
speed.
It is note-worthy that the „historian‟ was used to get the last
vibration amplitude reading just before failure and matched
with turbine speed from a defective Delta Unit 3 H-25 engine
in the same location. This helped to actuallize the simulation
carried out in this work when compared with the readings of
the normal running condition obtained from the Delta Unit 5
H-25 engine. Eccentricity of the shaft through deformed
bearing was not possible to be established in the process of the
work. Hence lumped vibration equations were used in the
calculations. Due to the above reason, wave equations as
introduced in D‟Alembert‟s principles were also used in the
research.
A secondary source of data collection technique which
involved a case study approach was used in the work. This
involved data collection on a large number of variables and
enhanced validation of findings.
Fig. 3: Program code in C++ programming language
Speeds were taken at various loads with a view to finding the
effect of load on turbine speed and vibration amplitude. These
vibration amplitudes were matched with the corresponding
turbine speeds at which they occurred.
The measuring instrumentations used were those already fitted
on the GT plants. These were the model CV-87 high
temperature velocity transducer, a self-generating electro-
.xC
..xM Kx
Start
Input total Number
of iterations NN
Input K, C, M, e,
Input N(I), Time (I)
I=0
No
Yes
I=I+1
I ˂NN
Stop
Declare and define
variables used
= 52.36*X*106*ω
ω(I)=2πN(I), Time (I)
Print (I), ω(I), N(I), Time (I)
4 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
dynamic moving coil instrument which required no external
power supply and a module VT-355P electromagnetic type
speed detector (Model PA-150).
Table 1: Reading taken from GT-3 and GT-5
Turbine Speed
(rpm)
reference Vibration
Amplitude (mm/s)
load (MW)
Bearing 1 Bearing 2 Bearing 4 Bearing 5
GT-5
normal
GT-3
before
failure
GT-5
normal
GT-3
before
failure
GT-5
normal
GT-3
before
failure
GT-5
normal
GT-3
before
failure
7264 2.41 - 2.31 3.1 2.12 2.72 0.97 1.56 0.19 0.58
7326 2.92 15 2.88 3.29 2.06 2.62 0.91 1.49 0.21 0.62
7326 2.82 20 2.83 3.14 2.06 2.62 0.91 1.51 0.25 0.61
7328 2.71 - 2.67 2.99 2.59 3.07 0.76 1.66 0.25 0.59
7331 3.81 10 3.73 4.45 3.47 4.04 1.24 1.81 0.45 0.82
7341 2.5 20 2.38 2.99 2.08 2.64 0.83 1.41 0.25 0.62
7341 2.92 - 2.86 3.2 2.37 2.91 1.02 1.64 0.23 0.65
7342 3.39 20 3.39 4.08 3.09 3.63 0.76 1.38 0.36 0.69
7348 2.92 20 2.86 3.08 2.22 2.8 1.08 1.67 0.23 0.61
7349 2.92 20 2.71 3.18 2.5 3.08 0.79 1.34 0.25 0.66
7351 2.63 10 2.59 2.93 2.61 3.14 1.11 1.7 0.32 0.71
7352 2.64 10 2.73 3.09 2.25 2.85 1.09 1.62 0.33 0.74
7352 2.84 20 2.82 3.19 2.65 3.22 0.77 1.39 0.32 0.72
7355 2.92 20 2.87 3.24 2.76 3.31 0.81 1.34 0.32 0.73
7358 3.09 20 2.92 3.35 2.65 3.2 0.85 1.44 0.32 0.72
7359 2.92 20 2.76 3.11 2.65 3.2 0.85 1.49 0.32 0.74
7359 2.71 20 2.63 3.02 2.63 3.19 0.71 1.36 0.34 0.69
7360 3.55 20 3.19 3.71 2.13 2.71 0.51 1.06 0.28 0.7
7369 2.88 20 2.77 3.13 2.61 3.15 1.11 1.68 0.32 0.74
7371 3.21 20 3.09 3.49 2.96 2.52 0.78 1.39 0.36 0.74
7379 2.96 20 2.9 3.34 2.65 3.25 0.83 1.47 0.38 0.8
7388 3.17 10 3.1 3.4 1.7 2.26 0.81 1.39 0.43 0.88
7392 3.04 20 3.05 3.51 2.63 3.34 0.81 1.43 0.36 0.62
7395 3.26 20 3.11 3.62 2.69 3.99 0.89 1.5 0.36 0.73
7404 3.26 20 3.09 3.46 2.5 3.08 1.04 1.61 0.32 0.73
7407 3.34 20 3.33 3.81 2.98 3.58 0.81 1.52 0.72 0.99
7436 3.26 20 3.26 3.7 2.7 3.35 0.74 1.34 0.38 0.77
The vibration and speed measurement module are installed in
the turbine supervisory system cabinet outside the engine
room while the output is indicated on the indicator or recorder
on the computer monitor (GT Manuals 1985, 2001 and
Ogbonnaya, 2004). Recordings and data could always easily
be obtained from a computer monitor while permanently
stored data are left in a historian attached to each engine. Data
from the historian are mostly retrievable only after an
emergency. The graphs shown in figures 4 to 7 are combined
plots of amplitude of vibration for bearings 1 to 4 of the
defective and reference GT engines obtained from
measurements. It was thus possible to carry out a simulation
while correlating a threshold operating limit of the failed GT
engine (Delta Unit 3) and that of the reference H-25 (Delta
Unit 5). The readings obtained were then fed into the
analogous equation 12 to that of D‟Alembert‟s equation.
5 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
3.0 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Values shown in table 1 represent parameters measured from
the engines used to demonstrate the authenticity of D‟
Alembert‟s solution to model and simulate bearing vibration
failure. No matter the form in which vibration is represented,
this work confirms that oscillation is always present whenever
a mechanical system is in operation.
Furthermore, the graphs shown in figures 4 to 7 helped to
show how trajectories generated from D‟Alembert‟s equation
can be used to make maintenance decision from vibration
spectrum. The load associated with each turbine speed is also
shown in table 1. The spectrum above in figures 4 to 7 are
those from a failed engine, GT-3 with similar characteristics
as GT-5 used for the simulation. Bearing 3 is not shown on the
shaft line of the plant because it exists as a thrust bearing on
which no transducer is fitted. The analysis of the recorded
vibration amplitudes versus turbine speeds is discussed below.
The vibration readings are tabulated bearing by bearing since
the transducers are fitted to the bearing housing. The effect of
vibration amplitude on bearing 1 increased rapidly at about
7326 rpm and attained an unusual waveform up to 7440 rpm.
The speed from 7264 to 7326 rpm is the run-up speed when
there is no load on the turbine. From the vibration spectrum of
bearing 1, it is noticed that the critical speed of the engine is
7331 rpm where vibration is highest. This speed
approximately corresponds to the specific critical speed of
7330 rpm in the manufacturer‟s manuals.
Fig. 4: Vibration amplitude for bearing 1 against turbine speed.
It is interesting to note that the vibration spectrum for bearing
2 generally has the same pattern with those of bearing 1 except
during the period of run-up. This is due to the fact that much
of the factors that lead to the pattern of slope during the run-up
period in bearing 1 have reduced.
Bearing 3 is the thrust bearing. No transducer is fitted to it.
Hence no vibration measurement is taken from it. It is thus
equally omitted in the labeling of the bearings in table 1.
Fig. 5: Vibration amplitude of bearing2 against turbine speed
Bearing 4 has the run-up vibration spectrum further sloping
downwards more than that of bearing 2 due to the same reason
proffered for bearing 2. However the peak-peak vibration
levels are of much more reduced levels than those of bearings
1 and 2. This is because bearing 4 is further away from the
reference point than bearings 1 and 2.
Fig. 6: Vibration amplitude of bearing 4 against rotational speed
Bearing 5 has almost a flat trajectory during run-up but very
slightly sloping upwards before the set of conspicuous
vibration. Its peak-peak values are equally much less than
those of other bearings. It could be noticed that the spectra for
GT 3 bearing just before failure have remarkable deviation
from these for GT 5 under normal operation. These deviations
would have been used to assertain the onset of failure even
before GT 3 finally grounded to a halt.
Reference velocity vibration amplitude is normally generally
imposed on all the bearings by either the engine manufacturers
or the engine operator/watch keeper. This is the limit of
0
1
2
3
4
5
7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 Vib
rati
on
am
plit
ud
e fo
r b
eari
ng
1 (m
m/s
)
Speed (rpm)
GT-5 GT-3
0
1
2
3
4
5
7250 7300 7350 7400 7450
Vib
rati
on
am
pli
tud
e f
or
bearin
g 2
(m
m/s
)
Speed (rpm) GT-5 GT-3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
7250 7300 7350 7400 7450
Vib
rati
on
am
pli
tud
e fo
r
bea
rin
g 4
(m
m/s
)
Speed (rpm) GT-5 GT-3
6 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
vibration level as shown in table 1 that no bearing vibration is
to exceed.
Fig. 7: Vibration amplitude of bearing 5 against speed
The reference vibration amplitude is also shown in fig 8 which
contains a general trajectory of all the bearings on one graph
to give a quick comparison of the various vibration amplitude
of the bearings for GT-5.
4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Conclusion
A work on optimization of GT bearing vibration using 2-D
D‟Alembert‟s equation has been carried out. An already
existing equation with bearing vibration amplitude, speed and
other terms as constants was infused into D‟ Alembert
equation to come up with the very useful innovation to handle
GT bearing defects. Results thus show that monitoring the
health of the bearings can help in the prevention of downtime
of a GT plant. The bearing at the compressor end of the GT
plant carries much load and thus high vibration amplitude
occurs there. So a step-by-step analysis of plant parameters
obtained was used to write a program on C++ programming
language to determine the vibration displacement amplitude of
the plant.
It was also found out that the amount of defect meted to the
GT depends on amplitude of vibration and friction as
measured at the bearing housings. The work also shows that vibration diagnostics is most efficient for detection and
identification of incipient defects in bearings. Therefore
vibration monitoring and analysis of GT bearings are very
important to reduce catastrophic downtime of the plant.
Fig. 8: Combined actual vibration amplitudes against turbine speeds
4.2 Recommendations
From the results obtained in this work, the following recommendations are made;
The performance of GT bearings should be constantly
monitored during the engine operation.
The software developed should be incorporated to help in
monitoring the vibration amplitude of the bearings.
The bearing at the turbine side should be rigidly
constructed.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
7250 7300 7350 7400 7450
Vib
rati
on
am
pli
tud
e f
or
bearin
g 5
(m
m/s
)
Speed (rpm) GT-5 GT-3
7 Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the roles played by Mr John
N. Woji and Mr Kuvie A. Ejabefio in collecting, collating the
data used for this work. They also helped in the typesetting of
the manuscript. We are also indebted to the Management and
Staff of Delta Thermal Station, Ughelli, Delta State, Nigeria
for allowing the use of their equipment. God bless you all.
References:
Ahmadi, H and Mollazade, K (2009) Bearing Fault Diagnosis
of a Mine Stone Grasher by Vibration Condition
Monitoring Techniques. Research Journal of Applied
Sciences, Engineering and Technology (c) Maxwell Scientific Organization. pp. 112 – 117.
Azovtsev, A., Barkov, A and Carter D (1997) Fluid Film
Bearing Diagnostics using Envelope Spectra, VAST, Inc
St. Peterburg, Russia, pp 1-10 [Online Serial] Available:
http//:www.vibrotech.com/articles/btnvi97/index.htm
[2002 Aug. 28]
Barkov A and Barkova N (1995) Conditon Assesment and
Life Prediction of Rolling Element Bearings-Part1, VAST,
St. Peterburg, Russia, Edited by Mitchell J.S,
Contributing Editor for Sound and Vibration pp 1-10
[Online Serial] Available:
http//:www.vibrotech.com/articles/sv95/part1/index.htm
[2002 Aug. 28]
Carter, D.L (1993) Some Instrumentation Consideration in
Rolling Element Bearing Condition Analysis, Boulder
Vibration Systems, Boulder, Colorado [Online Serial]
Available:
http//:www.vibrotech.com/articles/dlcvi93/dlcvi93.htm
[2002 Aug. 28]
Hitachi Ltd, Instructional Manual for GT Generator, Manual
Nr. T.S 11B2050-I.E Vol. Nr. T of 2, NEPA (Rehab of
Delta II and III Power Stations (Units 3-8) H-25 GT and
Accessories, Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
Hyunchua, K. and Shen, I.Y (2009) Mode Evolution of
Asymmetric Rotors Assembled to Flexible Bearing and
Housing, Proceedings of ASME Turbo-Expo 2009:
Florida, USA, p. 1
Indian Exporters‟ Guide, (2012)
(http://www.indianexpoters.com/whitemetal-babbitt-
metal-reconditioning-and -relining-sell99558.html)
Bangalore-karnataka, India.
Kreyszig, E (2010) Advanced Engineering Mathematics,
Aggarwal Printing Press, Delhi India, pp. 595-598.
Luo, G.Y, Osprey, D and Irle, M. (2000) Real Time Condition
Monitoring by Significant and Natural Frequencies
Analysis of Vibration Signal with Wavelet Filler and
Autocorrelation Enhancement, Journal of Sound and
Vibration. 236, pp. 413 – 430.
Meier-Peter, H (2009) Propulsion and Drive Technology, in
Compendium of Marine Engineering, edited by
Hansheinrich Meier-Peter and Frank Bernhardt, DVV Media Group, GmbH, Seehafen Verlag, Hamburg
(www.dvvmedia.com; www.shipandport.com)
Mobley, R. K (1999) Root Cause Failure Analysis (Plant
Engineering Maintenance Series). Butterworth-
Heinemann,
Ogbonnaya, E.A (2004) Modeling Vibration- Based Faults in
Rotor Shaft of A Gas Turbine, PhD Thesis, Department of
Marine Engineering, Rivers State University of Science
and Technology, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Ogbonnaya, E.A. (2009) Diagnozing and Prognozing Gas
Turbine Rotor Shaft Faults Using the “MICE”, ASME, Turbo-Expo, Paper No GT2009-59450, Orlando, Florida,
USA, pp. 61 – 68.
Saeed, S.H (2010) Automatic Control Systems (with MATLAB
Programs) Katson Educational Series, Sixth Revised
Edition:2008, pp. 12- 15
Sadhu, S. (2006) Mechanical Vibration and Noise Control,
Kannna Publisher 2-B, Nath Mandet, Nai Saradk Delhi-
100006 India, p 11.
Shawmont Ltd (1985) Operations and Maintenance Manual:
Gas Turbine Generator and Auxillaries, Vol 16, Part D,
Contract No. NEP/0078/LTS-1, Shawmont Ltd Tokyo-
Japan, pp. 1-5 and 25-26.
Tachung, Y and Kai-Shang, L (2009) Identification of Speed-
Dependent Bearing Coefficients from Unbalance
Responses in one Test Run, Proceedings of ASME Turbo-
Expo Power for Land Sea and Air, June 8 – 12, 2009,
Orlando, Florida, USA, GT 2009 – 59196 pp. 1 – 2.
Thomson, W. T (1972), Theory of vibration with applications,
Prentice–Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp.21-
23
8 Copyright © 2012 by ASME