Optimization of the symmetrical UWB TEM horns by matching

11
Optimisation of the symmetrical UWB TEM horns by matching Efimova N.A., Kaloshin V.A. Moscow Technical University of the Communication and Informatics Kotel’nikov Institute of the Radio-engineering and Electronics RAS

Transcript of Optimization of the symmetrical UWB TEM horns by matching

Optimisation of the

symmetrical UWB TEM horns

by matching

Efimova N.A., Kaloshin V.A.

Moscow Technical University of the

Communication and Informatics

Kotel’nikov Institute of the

Radio-engineering and Electronics RAS

ТЕМ horn

Geometry of a ТЕМ-horn

Advantages:

Simplicity

Adaptability

to manufacture

Broadbandness

High gain

Directivity

Disadvantages:

Big electrical size

Big difference

between angles α and

β

Instability of the phase

center

2

α

2a

β

x

3

Irregular ТЕМ-horn

x

a

α

E-plane Section

L β1/2

βi/2

βn/2

x d1

φn-1

H-plane Section

4

Coefficient of the reflection of the main mode by end of the plane waveguide

00 1

1

0 1,

,1 2

q

q

qe

R qe

qq

1

1

(0,0, ), 0 1

(0,0,2)

(0,0, ),1 2

(0,0,2)

effi

n

eff i ii

n

i i

q i

eff

iq eff i

eff

eff

g ce q

gR

q g ce q

q g

Coefficient of the reflection of the main mode by end of the regular horn

11

1

(0,0, ), 0 1

(0,0,2)exp( 2 )

(0,0, )2,1 2

(0,0,2)

eff j

n

eff j jj

n

j j

q j

effn

q eff jj

eff

eff

g ce q

gR I IkLj

q g ce q

q g

d

deff

Coefficient of the reflection of the main mode by end of the irregular horn

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

Accuracy test of the model

5

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

Proposed model Finite element method

Optimisation of the TEM horn,

made from 8 section

β1 = 16.61º, β2-β6 – see fig., β7 = 340º, β8 = 340º 6

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0,95 1,05 1,15 1,25

β2

β3

β4

β5

β6

угол,

kamin

0,8

0,85

0,9

0,95

1

1,05

1,1

4 6 8 10 12 14

kamin

Kamin VS number of the horns

section

7

Sections number, n

Result of the optimisation

Isometric E-plane section 8

Coefficient of the reflection VS

ka

kamin on level -10dB 0.8134

Broadbandness 1:22 9

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

0 5 10 15 20

Radiation pattern

10

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180

E-plane H-plane

Thank you for attention

11