Imagination: What is going to happen the minute I die?
Comprehension: Can I really grasp death?
SAVOIR MOURIR FOR PERSONAL USE
INSTRUMENTALIZING…
Practicalization of a deeply existential matter inherently promotes an abstinence
from meaning.
THE SACRED SPARKLE
SACRED AND FEARED
THE FEAR
“His eyes were not from this world”
Whatever fails to be identified as a known sociological or social problem, must be a feared (and therefore rejected) ontological concern.
SOLUTIONS + MEANINGS
…justifying and promoting the need for immortality
DEATH IN THE SPIRIT AND THE
LETTER OF MEDICINE
Medical Science
MEDICINE GAINS SOCIAL CONSENSUS
Medicine has safely and irreversibly become the religion of the majority because it holds the whole picture of modern worries together.
ECOSYSTEMIC HEALTH
DESIDERATUM OF HEALTH,
DESIDERATUM OF HOLINESS
A GIFT OF “GRACE”
The “vocation” of being healthy
THE “BOOK OF BOOKS”
The corpus of medical science
THE THEORETICAL UNIVERSE OF MEDICINE IS INFINITE AND
THANATOCENTRIC
THE HOPE FOR SALVATION IN THE
BODY
Finitude = an avoidable medical failure
Medical practice becomes the victim of the gap between its concrete tasks and its prophetic discourse.
THE MEDICO-LEGAL ROUTINE
The medical construction of death
AN “ITCHY” LACK OF ESCHATOLOGY
Successfully dissimulating…
THE MEDICAL HORIZONS ARE INEVITABLY CLOSED
The aftermath of a medical failure is a “sacred counterargument” for immortality.
The problem of the quest for (a positive) meaning of death will never go out of fashion.
BLAME IT ON SOCIETY?
THE “TOTAL” VERDICTS
„saved”-„unsaved” „moral”-„immoral”
“good”-”bad”
COMMITMENT IS RARE
… symbolical and practical constraints on the possible interpretations of commitment in general
SAVOIR VIVRE PRECEPTS?
Privatization of religion, free spirituality, relativism, individualism
etc.
THE POWER OF CHOICE
We are what we choose, or not at all.
The paradox in a society built on the priceless value of freedom of choice is that such value has no real value.
The arbitrary character of our social, cultural and existential decisions
VERSUS Death (the least arbitrary matter of
them all)
It is relative, non-exemplary, apparently un-sharable, and therefore problematic.
“SOCIAL ATHETICS”
OPTIONS THAT NEVER BECOME
SOLEMN CONVICTIONS
Once the choice has become insignificant, it becomes nothing but the most convincing expression of our cognitive and emotional inability of taking our occupations upon ourselves.
DEATH, AN ABSURD CROSS TO BEAR
The individual will suffer most from the consequences that he controls the least; that is, from the consequences of those options that concern him most intimately.
HAVE WE EVEN TRIED TO
PRESERVE THE ART OF DYING?
THE NORM
The difficulty of placing the other one’s savoir mourir in your very own, intimate universe of significances.
“Biographical solutions to systemic contradictions” (Z. Bauman)
…Genuinely looking for a sense for their biography.
A COHERENT SELF-NARRATIVE
death
…THE “BARE HANDS” OF OUR LITTLE FAMILY
BONDS
“Mommy, what exactly happens when you die?”
“OUR LITTLE TRUTH”
A (generalize-able) solution for legitimating a particular savoir mourir, for administrating the loneliness, and for edification of hope for a reunited family.
THE “FREE-STYLE” STORIES
largely justificative, elaborated, complex and “epicisized”
THE “OBLIGATIONS” OF THE STORY
TELLER
• To recapitulate on their own all the basic existential questions
• To critically revisit the largely accepted narratives
• To affectively, intuitively, committedly and practically (but not necessarily rationally) decide on a discourse that can be held true.
All testimonies on death cannot be denied or contradicted and, quite often, cannot be forgotten.
“ONTOLOGICAL” AGENDA
A DISJUNCTION
All personal death stories are inherently normative and always in the process of mainstreaming.
Death “resists” a random and excessive scattering of its meanings.