Regional Heritability Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci ... - MDPI
New quantitative trait loci for enhancing adaptation to salinity in rice from Hasawi, a Saudi...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of New quantitative trait loci for enhancing adaptation to salinity in rice from Hasawi, a Saudi...
1 23
EuphyticaInternational Journal of Plant Breeding ISSN 0014-2336 EuphyticaDOI 10.1007/s10681-014-1134-0
New quantitative trait loci for enhancingadaptation to salinity in rice from Hasawi,a Saudi landrace into three Africancultivars at the reproductive stage
Isaac Kofi Bimpong, Baboucarr Manneh,Bathe Diop, Kanfany Ghislain, AbdulaiSow, Nana Kofi Abaka Amoah, GlennGregorio, et al.
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and all
rights are held exclusively by Springer Science
+Business Media Dordrecht. This e-offprint
is for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you wish
to self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.
New quantitative trait loci for enhancing adaptationto salinity in rice from Hasawi, a Saudi landrace into threeAfrican cultivars at the reproductive stage
Isaac Kofi Bimpong • Baboucarr Manneh • Bathe Diop • Kanfany Ghislain •
Abdulai Sow • Nana Kofi Abaka Amoah • Glenn Gregorio •
Rakesh Kumar Singh • Rodomiro Ortiz • Marco Wopereis
Received: 27 December 2013 / Accepted: 24 April 2014
� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Abstract Salinity is a major constraint affecting rice
productivity in rainfed and irrigated agro-ecosystems.
Understanding salinity effects on rice production at
the reproductive stage could improve adaptation for
this trait. Identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs)
controlling adaptation to salinity may also accelerate
breeding rice germplasm for environments prone to
this stress. We used the salt tolerant landrace ‘Hasawi’
as a donor parent to generate three F2 offspring
(consisting each of 500 individuals) with three African
cultivars (‘NERICA-L-19’, ‘Sahel 108’ and ‘BG90-
2’) used as recipient parents (RP). The F2s and F2:3s
were evaluated for grain yield and other traits in saline
fields. Salinity caused reduction in all measured traits
across the F2-derived offspring, e.g. grain yield
reduced between 65 and 73 %, but some offspring
had twice the RP’s grain yield. QTL analysis revealed
75 QTLs for different traits in all 3 genetic back-
grounds (GBs): 24 of them were common among all
the 3 GBs while 31 were noted in 2 GBs, and 17 in one
GB. ‘Hasawi’ contributed on average 49 % alleles to
these QTLs. Two yield and yield related QTLs (qGY11
and qTN11) common in all 3 GBs were mapped on the
same chromosomal segment suggesting these QTLs
might be stable across different GBs. Four other QTLs
were strongly associated with salinity tolerance with
peak marker RM419, representing a potential candi-
date for MAS due to high LOD score and relatively
large effect QTLs.
I. K. Bimpong (&) � B. Manneh � B. Diop �K. Ghislain � A. Sow � N. K. A. Amoah
Africa Rice Centre, Sahel Regional Station, B.P 96,
Saint Louis, Senegal
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
B. Manneh
e-mail: [email protected]
B. Diop
e-mail: [email protected]
K. Ghislain
e-mail: [email protected]
A. Sow
e-mail: [email protected]
N. K. A. Amoah
e-mail: [email protected]
G. Gregorio � R. K. Singh
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI),
DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
e-mail: [email protected]
R. K. Singh
e-mail: [email protected]
R. Ortiz
Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 101, 23053 Alnarp,
Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Wopereis
Africa Rice Centre, 01 BP 2031, Cotonou, Benin
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Euphytica
DOI 10.1007/s10681-014-1134-0
Author's personal copy
Keywords Landrace �Marker-aided breeding �Field phenotyping �QTL � Rice �Microsatellites �Salinity
Abbreviations
CIM Composite interval mapping
MAS Marker-aided selection
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
QTL Quantitative trait loci
SES Standard evaluation system
SMR Single-marker regression
SSR Simple sequence repeats
Background
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) productivity continues to be
affected by a series of biotic (blast, bacterial blight,
Africa gall midge and Rice yellow mottle virus) and
abiotic (drought, cold, submergence, salinity and prob-
lem soils) stresses. Salinity is considered as one of the
important abiotic factors influencing rice production. It
is the second most widespread soil problem in rice
growing areas after drought and is considered as a
serious constraint to increased rice production world-
wide (Sabouri et al. 2009). Salt stress (both salinity and
alkalinity or sodicity) is a serious problem in some
African inland areas of Burundi, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mali,
Senegal and Sierra Leone, because salt builds up as a
result of the excessive use of irrigation water with
improper drainage, coupled with the use of poor-quality
irrigation water or sodic soils developed from salt-
bearing rocks. More than 4.4 million ha of arable land
are under rice cultivation in West Africa of which 25 %
of the area (irrigated, mangrove swamp and deep-water
systems) is directly affected by salinity (Lancon and
Erenstein 2002). In addition, it has been estimated that
1.5 million ha of cultivable mangrove swamps in West
Africa are affected by salinity (Jones 1986). The
problem of salinization is expected to increase due to
poor agricultural management practices and climate
change. The decrease in rice productivity in salt-
affected areas can be addressed by plant breeding as it
contribution to food security and poverty alleviation has
well been documented (Singh 1999; Evenson and Gollin
1997; Hossain et al. 2003). Furthermore, other inte-
grated approach combining land reclamation and crop
management can be used. Management practices are
however not always feasible in the long term, as in
coastal areas where salt stress is seasonal or in inlands
where cost of reclamation are high (Ismail and Tuong
2009).
Although various rice landraces and primitive
cultivars are often less desired than modern cultivars
due to their phenotypes, they have been included for
breeding genetically enhanced germplasm showing
adaptation to salty soils. Among the most successful
examples is the use of ‘Pokkali’and Nona Bokra ‘for
adaptation of early seedling stage to salinity and to
many traits including shoot K? concentration and
shoot Na? concentration (Lin et al. 2004; Ren et al.
2005). Landraces have not been however used signif-
icantly for breeding adaptation to salinity at the
reproductive stage, besides; it has been difficult to
utilize traditional landraces for the improvement of
quantitatively inherited traits, such as yield, because
the superior trait of interest cannot be identified
phenotypically in the accessions. There is therefore a
need to broaden the rice breeding pool for adaptation to
salinity especially at the reproductive stage of the crop
growth and development.
‘Hasawi’ is a landrace adapted to the climate of
eastern Saudi Arabia and characterized by its strong
adaptability to soil salinity and drought (Al-Mssallem
et al. 2011). It has some undesired traits such as
susceptibility for lodging, delayed maturity, and
photoperiod sensitivity. Allelic diversity studies using
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have
revealed that Hasawi belongs to the Aus cultivar
subgroup, thereby suggesting that there could be a
high level of polymorphism in offspring derived by
crossing this Saudi landrace and indica cultivars
(Thomson et al. 2010).
The identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs)
conferring adaptation to salinity at the reproductive
stage and the elucidation of its genetic control are
necessary for the developing marker-aided selection
(MAS) and pyramiding breeding with the aim of
improving the efficiency of rice genetic enhancement
for this trait. The best known and most robust QTLs
are Saltol on the short arm of chromosome 1, which
explains most of the variation for ion uptake under salt
stress, and SKC1/OsHKT8 that regulates K homoeo-
stasis and shoot Na? concentration in salt-tolerant
indica cultivar ‘Nona Bokra’ (Lin et al. 2004; Ren
et al. 2005). There are other QTLs that are putatively
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
associated with performance under salt stress, e.g. for
root Na?/K? ratio (Lang et al., 2001; Sabouri and
Sabouri 2009; Islam et al. 2011).
Even though rice is sensitive to salt stress during the
early seedling and reproductive stages (Lutts et al.
1995), more research has been conducted on the former
than in the latter because of the difficulty in using a
reliable phenotyping in the reproductive stage (Sabouri
et al. 2009). The reproductive stage in rice life cycle is
most important as it is the stage that will give the
ultimate source in terms of yield and yield parameters
such as productive panicles, fertility, and spikelets per
panicle. It has been observed that salt stress at panicle
initiation reduces the number of fertile florets, grain
weight, panicle length, and grain yield (Khatun et al.
1995). There is an urgent need to breed rice cultivars
that can adapt to salt-prone environments particularly
during the reproductive stage. The objective of this
research was therefore to identify QTL(s) conferring
adaptation to salt stress in the field at the reproductive
stage in offspring derived from crossing African rice
cultivars (‘NERICA-L-19’, ‘Sahel 108’ and ‘BG90-2’)
with ‘Hasawi’, to determine grain yield and yield-
enhancing loci from ‘Hasawi’ in their segregating
offspring, and to find common QTL(s) across the
different genetic backgrounds (GBs) when being under
salinity in the field, which could be further use in MAS
for breeding rice cultivars aiming agro-ecosystems
affected by saline soils.
Materials and methods
Parental lines and population development
Three large F2 populations derived by crossing
popular African cultivars (‘NERICA-L-19’, ‘Sa-
hel108’ and ‘BG90-2’) with ‘Hasawi’ were used in
this research. Genetic analysis revealed that ‘Hasawi’
has alleles that differ from the already known salinity
tolerance QTL Saltol derived from ‘Pokkali’ (Fig. 1).
‘NERICA-L-19’ is one of the New Rice for Africa
(NERICA) cultivars adapted to the lowlands and
irrigated areas, which was developed after crossing
Asian rice and African rice (O. glaberrima). NERICA
cultivars are poorly adapted to saline soils. ‘Sahel 108’
(IR13240-108-2-2-3) is a semi-dwarf high yielding
indica cultivar bred for irrigated and favorable rainfed
lowlands and is sown in excess of 90 % on both sides
of Senegal and on the Mauritanian side of the Senegal
River. ‘BG90-2’ is regarded as having an excellent
yield potential and good grain quality, and it is grown
in 90 % of irrigated rice areas of Mali as well as in
Burkina Faso, Mauritania and Niger.
Hybridizations were made in the screenhouse of the
AfricaRice Sahel Regional Station near Saint Louis in
Senegal from 2010 to 2012. The three elite African
cultivars were used as female parents while ‘Hasawi’
was the male parent. The resulting F1 plants were
intermediate in morphological characteristics and
were selfed to produce the F2 generation. The F2
plants were examined for plant morphology and
fertility and those which looked good in plant type
were phenotyped for the salinity related traits and
genotyping using simple sequence repeats (SSR) or
microsatellites. The resulting F2-derived populations
are named in this article following the mother’s
cultivar name.
Experimental sites
The study was conducted at AfricaRice research farms
in Ndiaye, Senegal (16�32.141 N; 15�11.545 W) for
the non-saline environment and at Institut Senegalais
HASAWI
Fig. 1 Genetic analysis of Hasawi compared to Pokkali already
known salinity tolerance donor for QTL Saltol, FL478 an
international tolerant check and IR29 an International sensitive
check using RM 243
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
de Recherche Agricoles (ISRA) research field in
Ndiol, Senegal for the saline environment. Both sites
are located in the Senegal River Valley and close to the
coast (about 40 km inland). Soil salinity at both sites
and in the river delta is generally high due to the
occurrence of marine salt deposits in the subsoil.
Electrical conductivity (EC) of the normal field is less
than 1 ds m-1 and it ranges between 6.5 and
9.5 dS m-1 for the saline fields. The soil profile at
AfricaRice research site corresponds to a typical
Orthithionic gleysol. The original soil contained at
least 10 mg C kg-1 of soil and 5 mg P kg-1 (P-
Bray1). The climate of both sites is characterized by a
wet season with approximately 200 mm rainfall per
year from July to October, a cold dry season from
November to February and a hot dry season from
March to June. Trials in lowlands under irrigated
conditions where no salinity stress was imposed are
referred to as non-stress trials.
Field screening of F2 progenies using the single
tiller approach
We used a single tiller approach because the annual
rice plant evolved from perennial wild species in
which a single or a few tillers removed from the
mother plant and planted could grow and produced
grains. We assessed the characters of replanted tillers
by comparing them with those of corresponding
undisturbed plants. Sufficient seeds were produced
for generation advancement and grain yield. The grain
yield for single-tiller crops does not represent the
genotype’s true potential but progeny testing on F2:3
derived-offspring could be used instead.
A total of 500 plants from each of the F2 derived-
populations were grown under controlled conditions
using the approach of single tiller at a spacing of
20 9 20 cm during the 2011–2012 wet seasons. A
total of 500 each of the two parents from each cross
were transplanted 25 days after seeding side by side of
each single F2 progeny. Four weeks after transplant-
ing, a single tiller was removed from each of the 500
mother plants and the two parents and transplanted in
the site for the saline stress trial. After transplanting,
approximately 5 cm of standing water was maintained
in the field until drainage before harvest for the non-
saline fields and until initiation of stress for saline
fields. Measurements were taken regularly to monitor
the salt concentration and adjusted accordingly.
Salinization was done by broadcasting measured
quantity of granular NaCl, representing the type of
salinity found in most parts of Senegal River valleys in
the standing water. Weeds were controlled by appli-
cation of post-emergence herbicide and by hand
weeding. Inorganic NPK fertilizer was applied at
150–60–60 kg ha-1 in both non-stress and stress trials.
The nitrogen was applied as 40 % each at basal and at
maximum tillering and 20 % at panicle initiation. P
and K were applied as basal fertilizers.
Trait evaluation
Data were recorded for the following traits:
1. Days to flowering/heading (days), i.e., the average
number of days from seeding until the panicles
had flowered;
2. Plant height (centimeter), Measured from the soil
surface to the tip of the tallest panicle (awns
excluded); this was recorded at eight consecutive
weeks after transplanting;
3. Number of tillers per plant; each tiller per plant
was counted. This was recorded at eight consec-
utive weeks after transplanting;
4. Panicle Sterility, i.e.; number of unfilled spikelets
deducted from the total number of spikelets per
plant and expressed as percentage
5. Grain yield (g m-2), i.e., the number of filled
spikelets per plant;
6. 1,000-grain weight (g), i.e., the average weight of
1,000 seeds from the sample harvested grains
from the plants;
7. Yield per plant (g m-2), for which each hills is
harvested to estimate the grain yield from each
plot. Seeds were then dried (50 �C), weighed, and
adjusted to a moisture content of 14 %;
8. Yield-component data for each plot, based on the
number of tillers, panicle counts, and filled, and
unfilled grain;
9. Salt tolerance score (SES score) were recorded at
83 and 100 days after transplanting using the
standard evaluation system (SES) of the Interna-
tional Rice Research Institute, in which a score of 1
was for a tolerant plant, 3 for moderately tolerant,
and a score above 5 was for a susceptible);
The percent reduction for each trait in stressed
plants was calculated relative to the nonstressed
control.
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
Field screening of F2:3 offspring
We also assessed the performance of the selected
F2:3 derived-offspring during the 2nd season, using
an alpha lattice design with 3 replications under
saline stress and 2 replications under non-saline
conditions during the 2011–2012 dry seasons. Rows
were 2 m long and spaced at 0.2 m between rows
and between hills. One seedling was in each hill.
The same procedure used for the single tiller
approach in the 2011–2012 wet seasons was used.
Field plots were measured at 3 days intervals
regularly to monitor the salt concentration and
adjusted accordingly. Data were recorded as per
those used in previous F2 trials with some modi-
fications. Four hills per entry were harvested and
used for grain yield and its components. Days to
50 % flowering was recorded when at least half of
the plants in the plot had flowering tillers. Grain
yield was determined on a 0.4 m2 area in the
middle of each plot after removing the borders. In
addition the following parameters were taken
Panicle m-2 (g), estimated as the total number of
panicles used for yield component analysis and
expressed in per square meter.
Number of Grain/Panicles (g): mean weight of all
the grains countered from the total number of
panicles harvested for yield component analysis
Panicles sterility (%): this is estimated as the total
number of unfilled grains in a panicle from the total
number of filled grains on the panicles and
expressed as percentage.
Statistical analysis
SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc 2004) was used for
analyzing the data. The analysis was based on mixed
models in which progenies were considered as fixed
factors whereas replicates and blocks within replicates
(wherever applicable) were random factors. Least
squares estimates of each trait on each progeny were
obtained using the Proc GLM option of SAS software
(SAS Institute Inc 2004). Broad sense heritability
(H)—i.e., the ratio of genetic to phenotypic variation
was estimated using variance components of the
analysis of variance.
Selection criteria for molecular
and QTL(s) detection
Genotyping was carried out using the F2 progenies that
performed better in terms of grain yield and SES score
than the mean of the 500 parents used in the first
season trials. This resulted in selecting 113 progenies
for F2 derived-NERICA-L-19, 114 progenies from F2
derived-Sahel 108, and 130 progenies from F2
derived-BG90-2.
To eliminate any bias, we randomly selected extra
10 % of the progenies from each of the F2 populations
to add to the initial populations that were selected
based on yield and SES score. A total of 153 progenies
were selected from F2 derived-NERICA-L-19, 154
progenies from F2 derived-Sahel 108, and 168 prog-
enies from F2 derived-BG90-2.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and marker
analysis
DNA was extracted from 21-day old seedlings from
the screenhouse using the protocol of Dellaporta et al.
(1983) with some modifications. DNA was dissolved
in 200 ll of 1X TE buffer and stored at -20 �C and
was diluted to 25 ng ll-1 of double-distilled water
and used as working stock. Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplification and detection for SSR markers
was performed on a G-storm system (96 and 384-well
alpha unit). The protocols for PCR amplification and
detection of SSR markers is basically the same as
described in Chin et al. (2003). We used a non-
denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(PAGE) to obtain a high resolution following a
modified procedure by AfricaRice Biotechnology
Laboratory at Senegal. The whole vertical rig assem-
bly was then set in place with 1XTBE as running
buffer. Four microliters of PCR product of which 4 ll
of 6 9 loading dye has been added to each well were
loaded on the wells with 1 kb ladder marker. Voltage
was set at 100 V and running time for electrophoresis
was variable ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 h depending on
the expected size of the PCR product for the marker.
The gels were stained with ethidium bromide for
10–15 min. DNA bands were visualized under UV
light using the gel documentation systems. Gel scoring
was done manually.
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
Polymorphism and parental genome coverage
We used 203 microsatellite markers (SSR markers)
distributed all over the genome at approximately
10 cM intervals for a parental polymorphism survey
using 8 % high-resolution PAGE. Additional markers
were analyzed around the region that showed
polymorphism.
Marker analysis and QTL identification
Statistical analysis was performed using QGene
program (Nelson 1997). QTL analysis was conducted
on each of the F2 by regressing field performance
using the genotype information based on SSR markers
and a linkage map previously developed by Temnykh
et al. (2001) and McCouch et al. (2002). The
chromosomal locations of QTL were determined by
single-marker regression (SMR) and composite inter-
val mapping (CIM). In SMR, a QTL was declared if
the phenotype was associated with a marker locus at
P \ 0.001 or with two adjacent marker loci at
P \ 0.05. Significance thresholds for CIM were
determined using 10,000 permutations for each trait
with 4 iterations. For CIM, the experiment-wise
significance level of P \ 0.01 and P \ 0.05 corre-
sponds to an average LOD of the traits. When two
LOD peaks fell in a common support interval, only
one QTL was considered to be present, and its
approximate position was taken as the highest peak.
QTL detected by SMR or CIM were in agreement with
each other and were detected by both methods. The
proportion of observed phenotypic variation attribut-
able to a particular QTL was estimated by the
coefficient of determination (R2). QTL results in the
current study were compared with previously detected
rice QTLs for traits by using RICE QTL in TRAITS
option on the Gramene Web site (www.gramene.org/).
QTL Nomenclature
This article follows the naming described by
McCouch et al. (1997) where a 2- or 3-letter abbre-
viation is followed by the number of chromosome on
which the QTL is found and a terminal suffix,
separated by a period, provides a unique identifier to
distinguish multiple QTL on a single chromosome.
Results
Saline levels in the experimental fields
Salinity levels were continuously monitored in all
plots after maximum tillering until maturity. Soils
were sampled at a depth of 20 cm at five different spot
within each plot three times in a week and analyzed to
determine the saline levels. Average EC readings for
all replications for each of the 2 experimental sites are
shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 4. Average electrical conduc-
tivity of soils under non saline control conditions was
1.03 dS m-1 for the ‘NERICA-L-19 GB plots and
ranged from 0.17 to 1.98 dS m-1, while in the saline
stress fields salinity levels ranged from 0.94 to
12.8 dS m-1 and with a mean of 5.83 dS m-1. In
the ‘Sahel 108’ GB non-saline plots the mean salinity
level was 1.26 dS m-1 and with a range between 0.23
and 2.59 dS m-1. The salinity level ranged between
0.73 and 8.04 dS m-1 (mean = 5.65 dS m-1) in the
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
43 47 54 58 63 68 72 77 82 86 91 96 100 107
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dS
m-1
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
38 40 42 45 47 52 54 59 61 63 66 68 70 73 75 77 80 82 84 89 91 94 96 115
EC (dsm-1)
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dsm
-1)
EC (dsm-1)
EC (dsm-1)
a
b
Fig. 2 a Salinity levels measured under the non-stress condi-
tions in the NERICA-L-19 GB, b salinity levels measured under
the saline stress conditions in the NERICA-L-19 GB
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
saline plots. Mean salinity levels in the ‘BG90-2’ GB
control plots was 0.9 dS m-1 with a range between
0.12 and 1.67 dS m-1, while those under saline
stressed-plots ranged from 1.78 to 13.4 dS m-1
(mean = 7.91 dS m-1).
Trait Analysis and Field Performance of F2:3
Offspring
The means, standard deviations and heritability of the
quantitative traits measured in the F2:3 offspring are
given in Tables 1, 2 and 3. The data were approxi-
mately normally distributed, indicating the feasibility
of QTL mapping for all traits in the 3 GBs. Significant
variations for all traits was observed as well as
transgressive segregation.
NERICA-L-19 9 Hasawi GB
Salinity stress caused significant reduction for all
measured traits in the NERICA-L-19 GB (Table 1).
Yield of recurrent parent (NERICA-L-19) was
reduced by 95 % under saline stress while in the F2:3
progenies mean reduction of 65 % over the non-saline
condition was observed. Heritability values were
relatively higher for days to flowering and number of
tillers in the experiments. Of the 153 progenies studied
33 showed at least 15 % increase over NERICA-L-19;
the recurrent parent for three or more yield
components.
Sahel 108 9 Hasawi GB
The mean values showed that the grain yield and its
components, except for the number of tillers, and
panicle sterility of the recurrent parent (Sahel 108)
were higher than the corresponding values of the F2:3
progenies; even though wide range of yield response
was observed in the progenies with some progenies
having better yields than the recurrent parent under
both saline and non-stress conditions (Table 2). The
progenies were also relatively taller than the recurrent
parent. The heritability values were high for all
measured traits.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6a
b
50 51 54 56 61 63 65 68 70 73 75 77 79 82 84 86 89 91 93
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dsm
-1)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
52 54 56 59 61 66 68 73 75 77 80 82 84 87 89 91 94
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dsm
-1)
EC (dsm-1)
EC (dsm-1)
Fig. 3 a Salinity levels measured under the non-stress condi-
tions in the Sahel108 GB, b salinity levels measured under the
saline stress conditions in the Sahel108 GB
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6a
b
50 51 54 56 61 63 65 68 70 73 75 77 79 82 84 86 89 91 93
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dsm
-1)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
45 47 49 52 54 59 61 66 68 70 73 75 77 80 82 84 87 89 91 96 98101122
Number of days after transplanting (DAT)
Ele
ctri
cal c
on
du
ctiv
ity
(dsm
-1)
EC (dsm-1)
EC (dsm-1)
Fig. 4 a Salinity levels measured under the non-stress condi-
tions in the BG90-2 GB, b salinity levels measured under the
saline stress conditions in the BG90-2 GB
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
BG90-2 9 Hasawi GB
Wide variation for yield was observed among the
progenies ranging from 1.50 to 542.50 g m-2 with an
average yield of 120.48 g m-2 under stress conditions.
Salinity caused a yield reduction of 96 % in the
recurrent parent and 72.83 % among the progenies.
Even though 23 of the 167 progenies had higher yields
or were similar in yield to the recurrent parent, BG90-2
under non saline conditions, the mean yield of the
Table 1 Agronomic performance of F2:3 progenies from ‘NERICA-L19’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ and female parent under saline and non-saline
stress
Treatment Mean SD Variance Range Heritability (%) ‘NERICA-L-19’a
Grain yield (g m-2) Stress 171.38 67.45 4,549.80 0–356.5 43 27.02
No stress 494.00 290.00 83,822.50 70–1,148.9 579.44
Panicle m-2 Stress 135.80 129.64 16,805.40 12.5–418.75 48 52.00
No stress 584.38 217.50 47,302.71 0–1,150 543.75
Grain per panicles Stress 5.28 3.76 14.15 1–13.3 – 4.00
No stress 31.50 17.09 292.16 6.2–78.1 41.90
Days to 50 % flowering Stress 121.10 15.15 230.00 90–147 76 –
No stress 108.22 17.34 300.59 83–144 104.50
Plant height (cm) Stress 89.69 13.67 187.00 64–112 45 –
No stress 154.38 24.50 599.99 95–204.3 125.88
Tiller numbers Stress 22.68 6.2 38.00 19–37 72 –
No stress 26.84 3.90 15.22 37–184 27.25
1,000 seed weight (g) Stress 22.46 0.22 2.52 20–25 – 21.00
No stress 27.21 4.17 17.39 17.1–35 28.00
Panicles sterility (%) Stress 60.10 21.62 467.00 5.7–97.5 –
No stress 50.30 19.90 396.14 3.5–97.48 80.00
a The parent ‘Hasawi’ did not flower hence was discarded from this trial
Table 2 Agronomic performance of F2:3 progenies from ‘Sahel 108’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ and female parent under saline and non-saline
stress
Treatment Mean SD Variance Range Heritability (%) ‘Sahel 108’a
Grain yield (g m-2) Stress 125.94 94.27 8,886.83 6.90–386.25 58 269.50
No stress 369.46 348.46 121,426 6.88–1,397.50 584.38
Panicle m-2 (g) Stress 134.32 116.99 13,687 6.78–606.7 72 311.63
No stress 599.99 224.64 5,046.45 56.25–1,481.25 493.75
Harvest Index (%) Stress 11.06 5.50 0.30 4.5–30.70 49 14.00
No stress 24.90 18.70 3.50 4.30–75.40 60.00
Days to 50 % flowering (day) Stress 99.80 22.26 495.0 53.0–139.0 78 86.50
No stress 95.19 21.90 479.00 44.0–144.0 79.50
Plant height (cm) Stress 94.51 16.98 288 62.25–138.75 92 71.13
No stress 125.07 34.95 1,221.33 62.27–198.50 93.75
Tiller numbers Stress 18.37 5.72 33 5.50–29.00 64 20.25
No stress 22.30 6.80 46.16 5.50–38.00 26.25
Panicles sterility (%) Stress 60.88 20.59 423.79 11.94–97.47 74 44.41
No stress 50.28 19.90 396.14 3.50–97.475 45.28
a The parent ‘Hasawi’ did not flower hence was discarded from this trial
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
progenies was statistically similar to the recurrent parent
(Table 3). Heritability values were relatively higher for
most of the measured traits in the experiments
Construction of linkage map and QTL
identification
Of the 203 SSR tested, 70 (35 %) were polymorphic
for NERICA-L-19 GBs, out of which 65 were then
applied in the population. For the Sahel 108 GB, 37 %
of the 203 SSR tested were polymorphic, of which 70
were used in the population and the construction of the
linkage map. There were 70 polymorphic markers
(35 %) in the BG90-2 GB.
Identification of putative QTL
NERICA-L-19 GB
QTL mapping was carried out using 153 progenies
comprising of 59 progenies that had better grain yield
and SES score than the mean of the 500 parents and 94
randomly selected progenies. A total of 30 QTLs were
detected for nine different traits. These include 4
QTLs each for SES tolerance score, plant height at
maturity, days to heading and grain number per
panicle; 3 QTLs each for number of tillers at maturity,
percent fertile panicle, 1,000-grain weight and grain
yield, and 2 QTLs for number of panicles (Table 4).
All QTLs were located on 5 chromosomes, namely 1,
6, 8, 10 and 11. The contribution of the phenotypic
variation explained by each QTL ranged from 14.8 to
49.5 % with LOD scores ranging from 5.3 to 22.7. The
additive effects of 50 % out of the 30 QTLs were
negative suggesting that alleles from ‘Hasawi’ con-
tributed to enhancing these traits (Table 4).
Sahel 108 GB
For this population QTL mapping was carried out
using 154 progenies comprising 60 progenies that had
better grain yield and SES score than the mean of the
500 parents and 94 randomly selected progenies.
There were 21 QTLs for six different traits spanning
across 7 chromosomes (1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10 and 11). Four
QTLs each were detected for heading date, number of
panicles and percent fertile panicle; and 3 QTLs each
for plant height at maturity, number of tillers at
maturity and grain yield. The contribution of the
phenotypic variation explained by each QTL ranged
from 7.3 to 31.9 % with LOD scores ranging from 2.1
to 11. Six QTLs had negative additive effects indicat-
ing the contribution of alleles from ‘Hasawi’ to these
traits (Table 5).
Table 3 Agronomic performance of F2:3 progenies from ‘BG90-2’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ and female parent under saline and non-saline stress
Treatment Mean SD Variance Range Heritability (%) ‘BG90-2’a
Grain yield (g m-2) Stress 120.484 95.19 9,060.41 1.50–542.50 41 19.00
No stress 443.58 237.96 56,624.94 105.13–1,208.16 486.80
Panicle m-2 (g) Stress 417.08 209.153 43,744.90 100.00–993.76 56 297.50
No stress 540.09 135.293 18,304.31 237.50–806.25 350.00
Number of Grain/Panicles (g) Stress 15.05 9.50 90.192 1.00–44.40 53 7.00
No stress 34.807 15.38 236,461 10.10–85.00 54.2
Harvest Index (%) Stress 17.3 8.20 0.70 5.10–43.70 49 –
No stress 36.8 9.70 0.90 13.60–72.40 43.80
Days to 50 % flowering (day) Stress 71.95 9.90 97.94 51.0–94.0 45 85.0
No stress 56.63 4.35 18.93 50.0–71.0 60.0
Plant height (cm) Stress 82.198 21.29 453.03 41.50–131.0 56 63.40
No stress 138.68 26.987 728.29 66.30–196.00 112.63
Tiller numbers Stress 22.57 7.05 49.68 6.0–37.0 60 13.15
No stress 26.820 11.252 126.62 12.50–179.50 23.13
Panicles sterility (%) Stress 50.53 18.27 333.74 9.60–95.22 38 74.0
No stress – – – – –
a The parent ‘Hasawi’ did not flower hence was discarded from this trial
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
BG90-2 GB
QTL mapping was carried out using 167 progenies
comprising 73 progenies that had better grain yield
and SES score than the mean of the 500 parents and 94
randomly selected progenies. There were 24 QTLs for
5 different traits of which 6 QTLs were for grain yield
and 5 QTLs were for number of tillers at maturity.
Table 4 Quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified in each chromosome (chr.) of ‘NERICA-L-19’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ F2 under saline stress
QTL Chr. Peak marker Flanking markers LOD R2 Additive effect Source
SES tolerance score
qSES1 1 RM8094 RM8094-RM582 7.3 19.6 0.14 NERICA-L-19
qSES6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 16.8 39.7 0.10 NERICA-L-19
qSES10 10 RM228 RM228-RM333 12.2 30.8 0.08 Hasawi
qSES11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 15.4 37.2 0.06 Hasawi
Plant height
qPH1 1 RM8094 RM8094-RM582 9.5 24.9 13.54 NERICA-L-19
qPH8 8 RM419 RM547-RM419 9.2 24.3 11.60 NERICA-L-19
qPH10 10 RM228 RM228-RM333 19.8 44.9 1.41 Hasawi
qPH11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 22.7 49.5 6.23 Hasawi
Tiller number
qTN6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 15.4 37.1 0.98 Hasawi
qTN10 10 RM184 RM216-RM184 8.9 23.4 38.61 Hasawi
qTN11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 11.2 28.6 0.35 NERICA-L-19
Heading date
qDTF8 8 RM419 RM547-RM419 9.0 23.9 4.82 Hasawi
qDTF10.1 10 RM6691 RM184-RM228 13.7 34.0 55.13 Hasawi
qDTF10.2 10 RM228 RM228-RM333 16.9 40.1 0.54 NERICA-L-19
qDTF11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 17.8 41.6 2.49 NERICA-L-19
Panicle number
qPN1 1 RM8094 RM8094-RM582 5.7 15.7 15.14 NERICA-L-19
qPN6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 5.3 14.8 3.64 Hasawi
Panicle sterility (%)
qPS1 1 RM8094 RM8094-RM582 10.2 26.5 9.03 Hasawi
qPS10 10 RM228 RM184-RM590 15.2 36.9 1.54 NERICA-L-19
qPS11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 19.4 44.5 6.51 NERICA-L-19
Grains per panicle
qGPP1 1 RM8094 RM8094-RM582 6.9 18.7 7.98 NERICA-L-19
qGPP6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 17.9 41.7 2.82 NERICA-L-19
qGPP10 10 RM228 RM184-RM590 12.5 31.4 0.49 Hasawi
qGPP11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 13.9 34.2 5.03 Hasawi
1,000-grain weight
qTGW6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 12.9 33.4 0.17 NERICA-L-19
qTGW10 10 RM228 RM184-RM228 13.4 34.5 0.38 Hasawi
qTGW11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 13.1 33.9 0.04 NERICA-L-19
Grain yield
qGY6 6 RM586 RM586-RM253 12.8 32.1 17.78 NERICA-L-19
qGY10 10 RM228 RM228-RM333 9.1 24.0 41.66 Hasawi
qGY11 11 RM536 RM536-RM287 8.5 22.5 30.78 Hasawi
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
Four QTLs each were detected for the number of
panicles m-2 and the number of grains per panicle.
One QTL each was detected for the SES tolerance
score and heading date (Table 6). All QTLs are on 8
different chromosomes, namely 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and
12. The contribution of the phenotypic variation
explained by each QTL ranged from 9 to 25 % and
the LOD scores ranged from 3.39 to 11.34. The
additive effects of 7 out of the 20 QTLs were negative
suggesting that alleles from ‘Hasawi’ contributed to
enhancing these traits (Table 6).
Common QTL and peak markers associated
with the 3 GBs
Altogether, 75 putative QTLs were identified in the 3
GBs with Hasawi as donor for both yield and yield
related traits. Thirty-two percent (24 QTLs) were
found in overlapping regions for the same or related
traits in all the 3 GBs; this comprises of 9 QTLs on
chromosome 1 and 15 QTLs on chromosome 11.
Under 2 GBs, 14 QTLs were found overlapping on
chromosome 10 in both NERICA-L-19 and Sa-
hel108 GB (9 QTLs in NERICA-L-19 GB and 5
QTLs in Sahel108 GB) with marker intervals RM228-
RM333 and RM330A-RM216. Between the NERI-
CA-L-19 and BG90-2 GB, 11 QTLs were identified
on 2 chromosomes (7 QTLs on chromosome 6 and 2
QTLs on chromosome 8). Seven of the 11 QTLs were
found in NERICA-L-19 GB (5 on chromosome 6 and
2 on chromosome 8) and 4 in BG90-2 GB (2 each on
chromosome 6 and 8). For the common QTLs between
Sahel 108 and BG90-2 GB, 6 were identified with all
located on chromosome 9. Five of the QTLs were
Table 5 Quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified in each chromosome (chr.) of ‘Sahel 108’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ F2 under saline stress
QTL Chr. Peak marker Flanking markers LOD R2 Additive effect Source
Plant height
qPH7 7 RM500 RM500-RM418 10.9 31.8 7.04 Hasawi
qPH10 10 RM228 RM216-RM330A 9.4 28.1 5.47 Sahel 108
qPH11 11 RM332 RM332-RM441 8.5 25.9 3.80 Sahel 108
Tiller number
qTN2 2 RM318 RM263-RM318 4.5 13.4 0.92 Sahel 108
qTN3 3 RM148 RM251-RM458 6.1 17.6 0.26 Hasawi
qTN11 RM341 RM209-RM341 6.9 19.7 0.77 Sahel 108
Heading date
qDTF1 1 RM220 RM220-RM529 5.0 15.9 1.21
qDTF7 7 RM500 RM500-RM418 9.9 28.8 7.07 Hasawi
qDTF10 10 RM216 RM216-RM330A 10.4 30.2 4.52 Sahel 108
qDTF11 11 RM441 RM332-RM229 4.4 14 9.50 Sahel 108
Panicle number
qPN1 1 RM220 RM220-RM529 5.1 16.2 42.66 Hasawi
qPN3 3 RM148 RM251-RM468 7.82 23.9 56.17 Hasawi
qPN7 7 RM336 RM418-RM336 8.2 24.9 98.46 Sahel 108
qPN10 10 RM228 RM216-RM330A 11.0 31.9 68.82 Sahel 108
Panicle sterility (%)
qPS2 2 RM318 RM263-RM318 5.8 18.4 10.87 Hasawi
qPS3 3 RM148 RM251-RM468 6.7 20.9 6.09 Sahel 108
qPS10 10 RM228 RM216-RM330A 6.2 19.6 2.46 Hasawi
qPS11 11 RM441 RM332-RM229 4.06 13.3 12.38 Hasawi
Grain yield
qGY9 9 RM410 RM524-RM242 2.28 7.3 15.39 Hasawi
qGY10 10 RM228 RM216-RM228 2.41 8.1 1.591 Hasawi
qGY11 11 RM332 RM332-RM229 2.37 8.0 0.148 Hasawi
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
identified on the BG90-2 GB and one in the GB of
Sahel 108
Single background QTL identified with peak
markers
A total of 17 QTLs covering 6 chromosomes were
identified under a single GB in both Sahel 108 and
BG90-2. Eight of the 17 QTLs were identified in the
GB of Sahel 108 with 3 QTLs each located on different
locations on chromosome 3 (qTN3, qPN3 and qPS3)
and chromosome 7 (qPH7, qDTF7 and qPN7). Two
QTLs were also identified on chromosome 2 (qTN2
and qPS2). For the BG90-2 GB, a total of nine QTLs
with 7 of them located on chromosome 5 (qTN5,
qDTF, qPN5, qPS5, qGG5, qGY5.1 and qGY5.2). One
QTL each were detected on chromosomes 4 (qSES4)
and 12 (qGPP12). None of the QTLs identified on
NERICA-L-19 GB were specific to this GB.
Discussion
1. Effect of salinity on yield
Very few studies has been reported on the effects of
salinity on yield and yield components at the
Table 6 Quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified in chromosomes of ‘BG90-2’ 9 ‘Hasawi’ F2 under saline stress
QTL Chr. Peak marker Flanking markers LOD R2 Additive effect Source
SES tolerance score
qSES4 4 RM252 RM551-RM252 3.5 9.0 0.32 Hasawi
Tiller number
qTN5 5 RM274 RM274-RM334 3.5 9.0 1.57 BG90-2
qTN6 6 RM527 RM527-RM253 3.4 9.0 0.61 BG90-2
qTN8 8 RM419 RM407-502 4.2 11.0 1.93 BG90-2
qTN9 9 RM242 RM410-RM278 4.0 10.0 0.74 Hasawi
qTN11 11 RM206 RM457-RM254 5.0 13.0 3.30 BG90-2
Heading date
qDTF5 5 RM161 RM430-RM274 2.5 6.5 7.86 Hasawi
Panicle number
qPN5 5 RM274 RM274-RM334 20.2 7.98 43.90 BG90-2
qPN8 8 RM419 RM407-RM502 5.0 13.0 14.93 BG90-2
qPN9 9 RM242 RM410-RM278 5.9 15.0 18.93 Hasawi
qPN11 11 RM206 RM457-RM254 9.0 21.9 98.65 BG90-2
Panicle sterility (%)
qPS1 1 RM129 RM582-RM212 2.2 5.8 6.68 Hasawi
qPS5 5 RM267 RM267-RM574 2.8 7.1 0.69 Hasawi
qPS9 9 RM434 RM434-419 2.8 7.3 6.07 Hasawi
Grains per panicle
qGPP5 5 RM267 RM267-RM289 7.3 18.0 1.87 Hasawi
qGPP11 11 RM254 RM457-RM254 6.6 17.0 4.43 BG90-2
qGPP11 9 RM410 RM434-RM242 5.6 14.0 0.36 BG90-2
qGPP12 12 RM313 RM512-RM313 4.3 11.0 3.69 Hasawi
Grain yield
qGY1 1 RM582 RM270-RM212 4.7 12.0 32.56 BG90-2
qGY5.1 5 RM267 RM267-RM289 8.2 20.0 20.33 Hasawi
qGY5.2 5 RM274 RM274-RM334 7.7 19.0 33.16 BG90-2
qGY6 6 RM527 RM527-RM253 4.8 12.0 2.16 Hasawi
qGY9 9 RM242 RM410-RM278 7.3 18.0 0.61 BG90-2
qGY11 11 RM254 RM457-RM254 11.3 27.0 66.64 BG90-2
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
reproductive stage of rice as most research has been
limited to the early vegetative stages (Moradi and
Ismail 2007; Zang et al. 2008). However; the few
studies that have been conducted have inconclusive
results which might be explained by the use of
different genotypes as demonstrated by Zeng et al.
(2002). The threshold of salinity at which the yield of
rice is affected by salt stress is as low as 3 dS m-1 EC
(Maas and Hoffiman 1997); but the salinity levels in
our experiments were on average above 5.65 dS m-1.
Salt stress resulted in a substantial decrease in grain
yield by 65, 66 and 73 % in NERICA-L-19, Sahel 108
and BG90-2 GBs respectively. Yield loss ranging
from 30 to 77 % has been reported under field
conditions (Nakhoda et al. 2012; Mahmood et al.
1999). Nonetheless, there was a wide range of grain
yield response in the progenies when grown under salt
stress with some of them showing better grain yield
than their African parents (356.50 vs 27.02 g m-2 in
NERICA-L-19 GB, and 542.50 vs. 19.0 g m-2 in
BG90-2 GB). In Sahel 108 GB, yield increase was
50 % in the progenies relative to the recurrent parent.
2. Hasawi derived alleles are associated with
improved yield
Selection under extreme stress to get surviving
genotypes could be a potential approach for identify-
ing germplasm sources for improving adaptation to
stressful environments. Some progenies in the exper-
iments showed transgressive performance for yield
under stress to the better parents; this suggests that
some positive alleles have been transferred from the
Saudi landrace ‘Hasawi’ into them. Our results
suggest that genes introgressed from Hasawi into elite
African cultivars can improve key agronomic traits,
even though Hasawi itself is phenotypically inferior to
these cultivars. Based on grain yield ([200 g m-2)
and final SES tolerance score, in excess of 20 superior
progenies from each of the three African-derived
offspring were selected for further use in breeding
adaptation to salt stress.
3. Beneficial alleles introgressed from Hasawi
Although Hasawi is phenotypically inferior to those
of O. sativa, we found that the former contributed
49 % of the beneficial alleles to QTLs identified in all
the 3 GBs for nearly all traits. Hasawi alleles
constituted 50 % in the NERICA-L-19 GB, 52 % in
the Sahel 108 GB and 46 % in the BG90-2 BG.
Beneficial alleles from landraces and wild rice species
to increased yield of rice under several abiotic stress
conditions have been reported in other studies; For
example, Bimpong et al. (2011) reported for drought,
Neeraja et al. 2007 and Septiningsih et al. (2009) have
reported for submergence and Ren et al. (2005) have
also reported for enhancing salinity tolerance to early
seedling stage. Three yields enhancing QTLs (qGY6,
qGY9 and qGY10) were identified in both NERICA-L-
19 and BG90-2 GBs; Sahel 108 and BG90-2 GBs and
NERICA-L-19 and Sahel 108 GBs respectively; hav-
ing an LOD score of between 2.1 and 12.8 and
explaining 7.3–32.1 % of the phenotypic variations
that was observed. These QTLs from Hasawi intro-
gressed could be new source of variation for genetic
improvement for salinity tolerance.
4. QTLs identified in more than one GB under salt
stress conditions
Most QTL research has been based on single GB. It
would be therefore expected that their QTL effects
will depend on the parentage, furthermore, one of the
major hurdles for the efficient use of MAS has been the
inability of using the favorable effects of QTL from
one GB to another (Xu and Crouch 2008). Besides,
since salinity tolerance is a complicated physiological
process in rice; it will be important if major QTLs
expressing in more than one GB can be detected at the
reproductive stage so as to facilitate the use of such
QTLs in MAS for salinity. In the present study we
identified 38 QTLs affecting many traits in more than
one GB (24 or 32 % QTLs in 3 GBs and 14 or 18.7 %
QTLs in 2 GBs). Two yield and yield related QTLs
(qGY11 and qTN11) were all mapped unto the same
chromosome in all the 3 GBs suggesting these QTLs
might be stable across different GBs. Two significant
QTLs associated with yield components under saline
stress (qPH10 and qPS10) were mapped to the same
positions as one major yield enhancing QTL (qGY10)
in both the NERICA-L-19 and Sahel 108 GB. This
locus is associated with an increase in grain yield per
plant under stress. Similarly, the region associated
with qTN6 which controlled an increase in number of
fertile tillers under saline stress was linked to qGY6
controlling an increase in yield per plant in both
NERICA-L-19 and BG90-2 GB. One QTL (qGY9)
associated with grain yield was mapped to the same
positions in the 2 GBs of Sahel 108 and the BG90-2.
Chromosomal regions associated with more than one
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
trait in rice have been reported (Reddy et al. 2005;
Bimpong et al. 2011). There is the need to further test
the stability of the identified QTLs being expressed in
more than one GB before making a conclusion.
Four QTLs (qDTF8 and qPH8) from NERICA-L-
19 GB and qTN8 and qPN8 from BG90-2 GB) on
chromosome 8 were found to be strongly associated
with salinity tolerance with peak marker RM419; with
an LOD score from 4.19 to 9.20; and explaining
11.0–23.9 % of the variance observed. It has long been
suggested by some authors that there might be an
important QTL(s) for salinity tolerance in this region
of the chromosome 8 (Ammar et al. 2009; Islam et al.
2011). More than four QTLs with flanking markers
RM3395 and RM281 on the same chromosome at both
the vegetative and reproductive stages have been
detected by Ammar et al. (2009) and Islam et al.
(2011). This region represents a potential candidate for
MAS because of the high LOD score and relatively
large effects QTLs consistently detected in salinity
studies.
A total of 14 QTLs strongly associated with salinity
tolerance were detected on chromosome 10 in 2 GB (9
in NERICA-L-19 GB and 5 in Sahel 108 GB); with an
LOD ranging between 2.4 to 19.8. Earlier work by
Islam et al. (2011) have implicated this same region to
harbor a major QTL(s) for salinity tolerance with an
LOD peak tightly linked with RM25217. Consistent
detection of QTLs in these regions of chromosome 10
in rice with different salinity tolerance donors under
different GB suggests that the QTLs located in this
segment might be relatively stable. It will therefore be
interesting to fine map this regions to identify the
major QTLs and also validate their effects.
To date most of the QTL work for salinity tolerance
in rice have all been on seedling stage under hydro-
ponic conditions (Singh and Flower 2010; Negrao
et al. 2011); except the work by Takehisa et al. (2004)
where QTLs for traits contributing to salinity tolerance
on chromosomes 3 and 7 under field conditions were
identified in addition, to one QTL (qLB3) for leaf
bronzing. In the current study; 3 QTLs each were
identified in similar positions on both chromosomes 3
(qTN3 qPS3 and qPN3) and 7 (qPH7,qPN7 and
qDTF7) in the Sahel 108 9 Hasawi GB with an LOD
score ranging between 6.1 and 10.9 and explaining
between 18 and 31.8 % of the phenotypic variation
observed. QTLs for multiple traits have also been
identified in similar regions of chromosome 3 and 7
(Sabouri and Sabouri 2009). These regions seem to be
a hotspot for salinity tolerance and further research
need to be conducted in other to confirm the kind of
hotspot present.
5. QTLs identified under single background
There were 17 QTLs on six chromosomes observed
under a single GB in all the 3 populations. Eight of it is
from Sahel 108 GB located on chromosomes 2, 3 and
7 (qTN2, qPS2, qTN3, qPN3 and qPS3. The rest are
qPH7, qDTF7 and qPN7). There was only one QTL
(qSES4) on chromosome 4 and seven QTLs (qTN5,
qDTF, qPN5, qPS5, qGG5, qGY5.1 and qGY5.2) on
chromosome 5 and one on chromosome 12 (qGPP12)
in the BG90-2 GB. Takehisa et al. (2004) identified
QTL for salinity tolerance overlapping in the same
chromosomal regions of qTN2 (from ‘Sahel 108 GB),
which enhances the production of tillers under field
conditions. Most of the QTLs for plant height
identified in this study have already been mapped to
similar positions at early seedling stage tolerance
(Gramene database 2014). None of the QTLs identi-
fied on NERICA-L-19 9 Hasawi GB were specific to
this GB.
6. QTLs identified in relation to earlier QTLs for
salinity tolerance
Our objective in the current study was to identify
QTLs tolerant to salt stress during the reproductive
stage under field condition as a step toward marker-
assisted breeding. Of the 75 QTLs identified in the
experiment, 28 (from NERICA-L-19 GB) are cluster-
ing on 5 chromosomes (1, 6, 8, 10 and 11); 20 QTLs
(from Sahel 108 GB) and are clustered on 7 chromo-
somes (1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10 and 11); whilst 24 QTLs (from
BG90-2 GB) spans across 8 chromosomes (1, 4, 5 6, 8,
9 11 and 12). The regular detection of salinity
tolerance QTLs on certain chromosomes especially
1, 4 and 6 were common in this study; where 9, 1 and 7
QTLs each were detected on chromosomes 1, 4 and 6
respectively.
A large number of QTLs for salinity tolerance have
been identified to be concentrated on the short arm of
chromosome 1 (Claes et al. 1990; Flowers et al. 2000,
Lang et al. 2001; Takehisa et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2004,
Ren et al. 2005; Zang et al. 2008, Sabouri et al. 2009,
Ammar et al. 2009). Similar observations were made
in this study where a total of 9 different QTLs were
identified in all the 3 GB clustering on chromosome 1.
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
Five of the QTLs (qSES1, qPH1, qPN1, qPS1 and
qGPP1) were identified in the NERICA-L-19 GB and
2 QTLs each in the Sahel 108 GB (qDTF1 and qPN1)
and BG90-2 GB (qPS1 and qGY1). The QTLs iden-
tified on this chromosome controls yield and yield
related traits which might suggest that most QTLs
controlling salinity tolerance in both the early seedling
and reproductive stage are located on chromosome 1.
Even though we used more than 50 SSR markers
each on chromosomes 2, 3, 5 and 12 across all the
3 GB (59, 58 and 57 SSR markers for NERICA-L-19,
Sahel 108 and BG90-2 GBs respectively), relatively
few QTLs were detected compared with other chro-
mosomes. For example only 2 QTLs were found on
chromosome 2, and 3 on chromosome 3 (all the QTLs
were in Sahel 108 GB), 7 QTLs on chromosome (all
QTLs in the BG90-2 GB) and only 1 QTL on
chromosome 12 (in the BG90-2 GB). Similar obser-
vations have been made by Negrao et al. (2011) where
they indicated that no repeated QTLs have been
detected on chromosome 8 and 11 with very few on
chromosomes 2, 3, 5 and 12. This might suggest that
some chromosome might be gene rich for salinity
tolerance compared to others; the availability of high
density molecular markers such as SNPs offer the
opportunity to saturate the chromosomes in which
fewer QTLs are usually detected to confirm these
observations.
Our research shows that ‘Hasawi’ despite having
undesired traits such as lodging susceptibility, delayed
maturity, and photoperiod sensitivity contains alleles
that are likely to significantly improve grain yield
under salinity. Alleles from ‘Hasawi’ could also
account for most of the high visual scores of leaf
symptoms observed in some of the progenies showing
enhanced adaptation to salinity. Some progenies had
however a higher score than ‘Hasawi’, thereby sug-
gesting transgressive segregation that could result
from the accumulation of favorable alleles. Thomson
et al. (2010) found this transgressive segregation and
indicated that additional QTL from ‘Pokkali’ were
involved. They mapped QTLs for SES score on
chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 11 and 12, but did not
overlap with 5 QTLs identified in our research, which
suggest we found new QTLs for enhancing rice
adaptation to salinity. They were qSES1, qSES6,
qSES10 and qSES11 in the NERICA-L-19 GB, and
qSES4 with RM 252 as a peak marker in the BG90-
2 GB. Further research may elucidate need what are
their associated mechanisms for enhancing adaptation
of rice to salinity.
7. Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
research publication identifying grain yield enhancing
QTLs at the reproductive stage of rice grown at saline
soils in Africa. We still need testing their stability
across seasons to establish if they can be expressed
over time. The new QTLs described in this article are
also good candidates for fine mapping and positional
cloning research, while, those mapped to known
chromosome regions bearing QTL(s) enhancing adap-
tation of rice to salinity, could be useful for MAS. Last
but not least, in this omics era, the availability of
complete sequence information dense DNA marker
systems for saturating linkage map will assist further
on understanding these QTLs.
References
Al-Mssallem MQ, Hampton SM, Frost GS, Brown JE (2011) A
study of Hasawi rice (Oryza sativa L.) in terms of its car-
bohydrate hydrolysis (in vitro) and glycaemic and insuli-
naemic indices (in vivo). Eur J Clin Nutr 65:627–634
Ammar MHM, Pandit A, Singh RK et al (2009) Mapping of
QTLs controlling Na?.K? and CI- ion concentrations in
salt tolerant indica rice variety CSR27. J Plant Biochem
Biotechnol 18:139–150
Bimpong IK, Serraj R, Chin JH, Ramos J, Mendoza ETM,
Hernandez J, Mendioro MS, Brar DS (2011) Identification
of QTLs for drought-related traits in alien introgression
lines derived from crosses of Rice (Oryza sativa cv
IR64) 9 O. glaberrima under lowland drought stress.
J Plant Bio 54:237–250
Chin JH, Kim JH, Kwon SW, Cho YI, Pia ZZ, Han LZ, Koh HJ
(2003) Identification of subspecies specific RAPD markers
in rice. Korean J Breed 35:102–108
Claes B, Dekeyser R, Villarroel R, Vandenbulcke M, Bauw G,
Van Montagu M, Caplan A (1990) Characterization of a
rice gene showing organ-specific expression in response to
salt stress and drought. Plant Cell 2:19–27
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA mini-
preparation: version II. Plant Mol Bio Report 4:19–21
Evenson RE, Gollin D (1997) Genetic resources, international
organization and improvement in rice varieties. Econ Dev
Cult Change 45:471–500
Flowers TJ, Koyama ML, Flowers SA, Sudhakar C, Singh KP,
Yeo AR (2000) QTL: their place in engineering tolerance
of rice to salinity. J Exp Bot 51:99–106
Hossain M, Gollin D, Cabanilla V, Cabrera E, Jonson N, Khush
GS, McLaren G (2003) International research and genetic
improvement and its effect on productivity: the impact of
international agricultural research. In: Evenson RE, Gollin
D (eds) Crop variety improvement and its effect on
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy
productivity: the impact of international agricultural
research. CABI, Wallingford, pp 71–107
Islam MR, Salam MA, Hassan L, Collard BCY, Singh RK,
Gregorio GB (2011) QTL mapping for salinity tolerance at
seedling stage in rice. Emir J Food and Agric 23:137–146
Ismail A, Tuong T (2009) Brackish water coastal zones of the
monsoon tropics: challenges and opportunities. In: Haefele
S, Ismail A (eds) Natural resource management for poverty
reduction and environmental sustainability in rice-based
systems. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos,
Philippines, pp 113–121
Jones MP (1986) Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in mangrove
swamp rice, in Rice genetics. In: Proceedings of the
international rice genetics symposium, 27–31 May 1985,
Manila, Philippines. International Rice Research Institute,
Metro Manila, Philippines, pp 411–422
Khatun S, Rizzo CA, Flower TJ (1995) Genotypic variation in
the effect of salinity on fertility in rice. Plant Soil
173:239–250
Lancon F, Erenstein O (2002) Potential and prospects for rice
production in West Africa. In: Sub-regional workshop on
harmonization of policies and coordination of programmes
on rice in the ECOWAS sub-region, Accra, Ghana, 25–28
February 2002. Bouake, Cote d’Ivoire: West Africa Rice
Development Association. http://www.hubrural.org/IMG/
pdf/potential-and-prospects-for-rice-production-wa.pdf
Lang NT, Yanagihara SS, Buu BC (2001) QTL analysis of salt
tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) SABRAO. J. Breed
Genet 33:11–20
Lin HX, Zhu MZ, Yano M, Gao JP, Liang ZW, Su WA, Hu XH,
Ren ZH, Chao DY (2004) QTLs for Na? and K? uptake of
the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance. Theor
Appl Genet 108:253–260
Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouhamont J (1995) Changes in plant
response to NaCI during development of rice (Oryza sativa
L.) Varieties differing in salinity resistance. J Exp Bot
46:1843–1852
Maas EV, Hoffiman GJ (1997) Crop salt tolerance-current
assessment. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 103(IR2):115–134
Mahmood IA, Quereshi RH, Aslam M (1999) Yield and quality
of different rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties as affected by
soil salinity. Pak J Bot 31:475–479
McCouch SR, Cho YG, Yano M et al (1997) Report on QTL
nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl 14:11
McCouch S, Teytelman L, Xu Y et al (2002) Development of
2,240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA
Res 9:199–207
Moradi F, Ismail AM (2007) Responses of photosynthesis,
chlorophyll fluorescence and ROS scavenging system to
salt stress during seeding and reproductive stage in rice.
Ann Bot 99:1161–1173
Nakhoda B, Leung H, Mendioro MS, Mohammadi-nejad G,
Ismail AM (2012) Isolation, characterization, and field
evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L., var. IR64) mutants with
altered responses to salt stress. Field Crops Res
127:191–202
Negrao S, Courtois B, Ahmadi N, Abreu I, Saibo N, Oliveira
MM (2011) Recent updates on salinity stress in rice: from
physiological to molecular responses. Crit Rev Plant Sci
30:329–377
Nelson JC (1997) QGENE: software for marker-based genomic
analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3:239–245
Neraja CN, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Pamplona A, Heuer S,
Collard BCY, Septiningsih EM, Vergara G, Sanchez D, Xu
K, Ismail AM et al (2007) A marker-assisted backcross
approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice culti-
vars. Theor Appl Genet 115:767–776
Reddy MP, Sarla N, Laxminarayana SN, Reddy V, Siddiq EA
(2005) Identification and mapping of yield and yield rela-
ted QTLs from an Indian accession of Oryza rufipogon.
BMC Genet 6:33
Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ,
Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX (2005) A rice quantitative trait
locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat
Genet 37:1141–1146
Sabouri H, Sabouri A (2009) New evidence of QTLs attributed
to salinity tolerance in rice. Afr J Biotechnol 7:4376–4383
Sabouri H, Reizai AM, Mouomeni A, Kavoussi M, Sabouri A
(2009) QTLs mapping of physiological traits related to salt
tolerance in young rice seedlings. Biol Plant 53:657–662
SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT� 9.2 user’s guide. SAS
Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina
Septiningsih EM, Pamplona AM, Sanchez DL, Neeraja CN,
Vergara GV, Heuer S, Ismail AM, Mackill DJ (2009)
Development of submergence tolerant rice cultivars: the
Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann Bot 103:151–160
Singh SP (1999) Developments in plant breeding: common bean
improvement in the twenty-first century. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht
Singh RK, Flower TJ (2010) The physiology and molecular
biology of the effects of salinity on rice. In: Pessarakli M
(ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress, 3rd edn. Taylor and
Francis, Boca Raton, Florida
Takehisa H, Shimodate T, Fukuta Y, Ueda T, Yano M, Yamaya
T, Kameya T, Sato T (2004) Identification of quantitative
trait loci for plant growth of rice in paddy field flooded with
salt water. Field Crops Res 89:85–95
Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartinhour
S, McCouch S (2001) Computational and experimental
analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): fre-
quency, length variation, transposon associations and
genetic marker potential. Genome Res 11:1441–1452
Thomson M, de Ocampo M, Egdane J et al (2010) Character-
izing the Saltol quantitative trait locus for salinity tolerance
in rice. Rice 3:148–160
Xu YB, Crouch JH (2008) Maker-assisted selection in plant
breeding from publications to practice. Crop Sci
48:391–407
Zang J, Sun Y, Wang Y et al (2008) Dissection of genetic
overlap of salt tolerance QTLs at the seedling and tillering
stages using backcross introgression lines in rice. Sci China
Ser C Life Sci 51:583–591
Zeng L, Shannon MC, Grieve CM (2002) Evaluation of salt
tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic
parameters. Euphytica 127:235–245
Euphytica
123
Author's personal copy