"Morisaki Kazue's Diasporic Interventions in Language." IJOS: International Journal of Okinawan...
Transcript of "Morisaki Kazue's Diasporic Interventions in Language." IJOS: International Journal of Okinawan...
*KURAに登録されているコンテンツの著作権は,執筆者,出版社(学協会)などが有します。*KURAに登録されているコンテンツの利用については,著作権法に規定されている私的使用や引用などの範囲内で行ってください。*著作権法に規定されている私的使用や引用などの範囲を超える利用を行う場合には,著作権者の許諾を得てください。ただし,著作権者から著作権等管理事業者(学術著作権協会,日本著作出版権管理システムなど)に権利委託されているコンテンツの利用手続については,各著作権等管理事業者に確認してください。
Title Morisaki Kazue's Diasporic Interventions in Language
Author(s) Yuki, Masami
Citation IJOS = International Journal of Okinawan Studies, 2(2): 31-40
Issue Date 2011
Type Journal Article
Text version publisher
URL http://hdl.handle.net/2297/38445
Right Copyright © 琉球大学国際沖縄研究所 International Institute forOkinawan Studies at the University of the Ryukyus|許可を得て登録
http://dspace.lib.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/dspace/
MorisakiKazue'sDiasponclnterventionsinLanguage
Se吋可・娼囎・阯旺鋲・皿㎡血皿岫韮伽
三一口口口I一言一口一口一三三・州岬
肌唖恥・雌Ⅷi
》・唖拙軸岬・姻晒唖岫
唾侭》州州恥恥
狗似W伽硴
.a11t,
》岬咽岫恥i耐艸州血鋤伽剛
e↑》.l
価”た由企肋哩
・uCe配伽t
Ⅷ伽醍仙川
恥》
川僻加・川ⅧS2t
岬刎叱剛函eVltt
岬州伸佃仙州恥
0a・1r・1
正邪睡仙加
州伽硴・叫岫,eee,Cia
刷祓噸岫如
》鋤恥州恥‐
咽昭.Ⅳ粕a随g
岬卿砿》柚岬岬
皿癖唾酔川・鴫.Ⅳhl,Omam誕祓
鋤伽峅吋州岫唖
畑hO旧虹i
●利■曇4口■し
dklnb
沈汕皿MCSS
函川呼州・油S
eS
州恥
eに.Sp
dam配O・
瓢皿Oe1len
elChml
●君■具
哩聰・伽剛皿佃、伽巾.、m妬.皿曲虹
32
developherobservationsandthoughtsonissuesoflanguageandidentity.Ontheotherhand,herinterestinoralhistory-theStylisticdependenceonothervoicesbymeansofquotationandtranscription-alsoseemstorepresentherdesirenottoimposeherviews
butto"waittohearwhat[fOreignnessofadifferentcultureandlanguage]wouldsayto[her]''(Morisaki,・.Seinohajimari''42).QUotingandtranscribingothersmayworkasa
strategyfbrallowingthemtomanifestthemselves,andinthiswayoralhistorycanbe
regardedasacarefilllyandstrategicallychosenmethodofapproachingothers.
Itisherresistancetobothidealizationofaplace-basedlanguageofintimacyandtoun-selfrefiectivecriticismofamodemlanguagethatcharacterizesMorisaki'sworkas
trulydiasporic.TbacertainextentMorisakiisphysicallydiasporicfOrherbeingasec-
ond-generationcolonistbornandraisedinKorea.Inheressayentitled6@TwoLanguagesandTwoSouls,''Morisakidescribesherbirthasa@6crime''duetoherpoliticallyandhis-toricallyconvolutedposition:
TbtalkaboutKoreaisaburden.Itmakesmefeelsoheavy-hearted,Ihardlyknowhowtobegin.IwasborninMikasa-cho,Thegu,Kyongsangpukto’Korea.
Sensingthatyourbirth-notthewayyoulivedyourlife,butthefactofhavingbeenborn-wasinitselfacrimeisnotsomethingyouspeakabouteasily....Itdoesmejustaslittlegoodtothinkthatlwasonlyachild,thatlwasn'tborninKoreabecauselwantedtobe.
ItistheveryfactthatIwasbominthatlandwithouthavingchosentodoso,thatlabsorbeditsculture,whichinturngaveshapetomybeing,thatgivesrisetomydilemma.IiinditimpossibletoremainoIJectiveaboutKoreaortheactivitiesofKoreans;IIosemycompo-sure.ThehairofmyKoreanmotherandmyKoreannannywhocarriedmeontheirbacks
stickstomylips.Itfillsmymonthwithmemorieslneverwouldhavehadhadwepartedinadifferentway.EachstrandismorefilledwiththecontentsofmysoulthanwordswilleverknOw・Ihavenotthepowertocompromise・Wordsareshrunken,unabletocontainthefUll-
ness.Korearaisedme,fedmeatitsbreast.(Morisaki,>woLanguagefl53)2)
Morisaki'saffectionfbrKoreaisobvious.3)ThedescriptionofhermemoryofKorea,
whichissoconcretethatshecouldnotthinkofthewomenwhomsheaffectionately
calledher&6Koreanmother''andher@6Koreannanny''withoutthefeelingoftheirhairon
herlips,demonstrateshowpeopleandtheenvironmentinKoreashapedandcoloredMorisaki'schildhood・Ifwecalltheplaceofourchildhoodselffbrmation@6home,
99
Korea,inwhichshe@Gabsorbeditsculturewhichinturngaveshapeto[her]being,''is
nothingbuthome.ButMorisaki'ssenseofbeing@6raised''byKoreanevercorrespondsto
hersenseofwhosheis,becausethehistoricalfactofherbeingasecond-generatiOncoIo-nistdoesnotallowhertoseeKoreaasherhome.
Moresothaninherpersonalbackground,Morisaki'sdiasporicidiosyncrasyismost
clearlydisplayedinherattitudetowardlanguage.HerawarenesSofnothavingherhome
ineitherKOreaorJapanoranywhereelsefbrmsabasisofherdiasporicperspectiveoflanguage.Insteadoflamentingtheabsenceofhome,Morisakioperatesherawarenessof
absenceinawaythatdevelopsacriticalperspectivefromwhichtoseekanall-加clusive
language,alanguagethatwouldallowherdiasporicbeingaswell.
35
MorisakiKazue'sDiasporiclnterventionsinLanguage
TherearemainlythreesignificanttopoifOrMorisaki'sliteraryexplorationsoflan-
guage.TheyareKorea,Okinawa,andMunakata.Asisdisplayedinher2004bOoktitle,
I"oc/zje"o"bi:Kα"肋k",Ok加αw",M""αkam[AJourneytoLife:Korea,Okinawa,
Munakatal,thosethreeplacesprovidegroundfromwhichMorisakiseeksanun-institu-
tionalizedwayoflife.Morisaki'sessayonYoron-aplacewhichsheperceivedasbeing
inthesamecategoryasOkinawa-isanexampleofhowsuchplaceshaveunsettling
effectsonconventiOnalnOtionsoflanguage.MunakataislocatedinnorthernKyushu,a
townclosetowhatwasoncethelargest-scalecoal-nningregioninJapan・Morisakilived
inacoal-miningtowninnorthernKyushufromthelatel950sthrOughthel970s,devel-
opingherliteraryactivismonlanguageandculturebymeansofhercontactwiththe
peculiarcultureofcoalminers.Munakataisalsoclosetocoastalvillageswhereshefre-
quentlyvisitedtolearnaboutfemaleabalonediversandtheiropenrelationshipswith
others,relationshipsthatMorisakifindssimlartothoseoffemalecoalminerswhose
eroticselfandsocialselfarenotseparatedastheyareinmodernsocieties.Koreais,asl
havementioned,whereMorisakiwasbornandraised;itistheplacewhichnurturedher
language-@6aJapaneselanguagefOranOverseasterritory''(Morisaki,MinshukOtoba''
28).ItisthesamelanguagethatherKOreancontemporarieswerefOrcedtouse,andMori-
sakidescribessuchalanguageas@6asystemoflanguagewhichdoesnothaveahOme
outsidethelanguageitself''(Morisaki,@GMinshukotoba''29).Itisindeedalanguagelived
bypeoplelikeMorisaki,yetunlikethelanguageinYoron,itdoesnotoriginateintheconcrete.
Allthoseplaces-Okinawa/Yoron,thecoal-miningregion,thecoastalvillages,and
KoreaasJapan'scolony-areconsideredtOhavesufferedfromJapan'smodemization
thatadvancedfromthelatenineteenthcenturyonward.Morisaki'sattentionisdirected
nottovictimizationaspectsofthoseplacesbuttheirpeculiarculture,whichseemstohave
evadedbeingappropriatedbyanationalisticideology・Usuallyplacessuchascoal-mining
towns,isolatedcoastalvillages,andremoteislandsareperceivedasmarginalized,
exploited,neglected,andtherebyvictimizedinthecourseofthenation'smodemization
andindustrialization.ItisnotuncommOntodescribethosemarginalizedpeopleand
placesasvictimsofmodernization,especiallyinapostcolonialdiscourse.Idonotdeny
thatsuchaviewhelpsillunnatethatwhichwaspreviouslyconcealedorhiddenina
moderndiscourseofpOwer.However,asisdemonstratedbySpivak'sobservationthatl
mentionedattheopeningofthisessay,ifapostcolonialviewmerelyreplacesacolonial
view,stillonesinglestorydominatesindividualandsocietalperceptionsofotherpeople
andcultures.ThisaccompanieswhatNigerianwriterChimamandaNgoziAdichiecalls
66thedangerofasinglestory.''InherTEDspeech,Adichiestates:
Itisimpossibletotalkaboutthesinglestorywithouttalkingaboutpower・Thereisa
word,anIgboword,thatlthinkaboutwheneverlthinkaboutthepowerstructuresofthe
world,anditifnkali.''It'sanounthatlooselytranslatesto。6tobegreaterthananother.''Like
oureconomicandpoliticalworlds,storiestooaredefinedbytheprincipleofnkali・Howthey
aretold,whotellsthem,whenthey'retold,howmanystoriesaretold,arereallydependent
36
onpower.(Adichie,nopage)
Whetherbeingjustornot,having。telling,andbelievinginasinglestoryisdangerousinthatitcannotbefreefromaparticularpowerstructure・HavingmanystOries,Adichieargues,helpsalleviatesuchdangerifnotannihilateit.
Inasimlarvein,Morisaki'sattitudetowardmarginalizedpeOpleandplacesallows
fOrdifferentstories,approachingthe/jvedworldofthosewhoareofteninterpretedashistorically,socially,andpoliticallyvictimized.Thereisnodoubtthatastoryoftheirbeingvictimizedisinawayanillustrationoftheirreality,anditisnotalwayseasytodistinguishwhatislivedbynativesfiFomwhatisconceptuallyperceivedbynon-natives.WhatlwishtoemphasizeasanotablecharacteristicofMorisaki'sapproachis.herdesire
toun-institutionalizeconceptuallyestablishedviewsofpeopleandplaces.
Herattempttomakeherownconceptualrealmun-institutionalizedisrecognizedin
herpositiveacceptanceof"I)se"ceasherepistemicfOOting.AccordingtoJapanesecriticandtranslatorFUjimotoKazuko,amajorcharacteristicofMorisaki'sworkisfOundinthe
writer'skeenawarenessofabsence-absenceofhome,identity,andevenlanguagewithwhichtoarticulateherself(Fujimotol47).Suchaconsciousnessofabsenceisatoncea
burdenandstrengthfOrMorisaki,asisdiscussedinasubtlewayinthefbllowingpassagefromher@6TwoLanguages,TwoSoulf:
Twodifferentandoverlappingculturescolormyperceptionof66I.''Thisisnoself-protectivesubterfuge.@T'isinnatelyacomprehensiveexpressionofthehistoricalstructureoftheindividual.Thewordisthuscompromisedoftwoappositivedynamcs-thereductivedynamicthatdistinguishesbetweentheindividualselfandothersandtheextensivedynamicthatencompassestheareaofsharedexperiencethatexistsbetweenselfandtheotherandthatnecessitatestheinclusionwithin@T'ofanindeiinitenumberofotherswithoutwhom@T'
wouldhavenomeaning.Ordinarily,asitisusedineverydayparlanceinJapan,thelatterfUnctionofthewordisclosertothesurface.Throughittherangeofresponsibilitytheindi-vidualmustacceptfOreverydaylifeismoreorlessambiguouslydefined.
IcametoJapanafterthewarandlearnedthattheJapaneseusedtheword@T'aroundtheaxisofthelatterfmction.InmylifeinKoreamyuseofthewordhadbeenbiasedinfavorofthehrmerfmction.IthoughttomyselfquizzicallythattheJapanesewereapeopleunabletograspthefUllfUnctionalrangeof@6I.''(Morisaki,"TwoLanguagerl54-55)
ThispassageillustrateswhereMorisakiculturallyandlinguisticallylocatesherself:she
seesJapanratherobjectivelywithoutmakingherselfconceptuallyassimlatedasJapa-
nese、4)Suchastancewouldbepositivelyevaluatedascosmopolitaninthepresentcontext
ofglobalization,butapositivemoodistotallyincompatiblewithMorisaki'spositionfrom
whichshereilectsonherpastlifeasasecond-generationcOlonist・Moreover,althoughthe
quotedpassageshowsthattheJapaneseusageof、6I''appearedstrangetoMorisaki,who
"absorbed[Korean]culture,whichinturngaveshapeto[her]being,"itdoesnotimply
thatMorisaki'sattitudeisrootedinKoreanculture.Rather,Morisaki'sgeopoliticalrecog-
nitionofherbackgrounddoesnotallowhertorelyonKoreanvalues,assheclaimsthat
she"[has]simplylostthemeanstoexpresswhatthereistosay''(Morisaki*GTwoLan-
37
9
MorisakiKazue'sDiasporiclnterventionsinLanguage
guage5'154).Thus,Morisakisufrerstheabsenceofalanguagewithwhichtoarticulate
herthOughts,herfeelings,andherSelf.Butatthesametime,theconsciousnessofabsence
workspositively,providingatabularasafbrMorisaki,whoseeksaplacefifomwhichto
approachothersandotherculturesinawaythatevadesinstitutionalizedthinking.
WhatmakesMorisaki'sperspectiveonlanguageuniqueisherscrutinyofpower
structuresamongthevariousregionallanguages.Usually,scholarlyattentiongoesto
hierarchicaldifferencesbetweenregionallanguagesandhomogeneous,standardlan-
guages,butMorisakipointsoutthesimilarhegemonicstructureworkingamongregional
languagesaswell.Inher@GMinshukotobanohassei''ITheBirthofPeople'sLanguage],
Morisakidiscussesthreeregionallanguages:anOkinawanlanguage,thatofacoal-
miningtowninKyushu,andtheJapaneseusedbyKoreansduringJapan'soccupation.
TheyareallusuallycOnsideredlanguagesusedbyvictims,yetMorisakidoesnotview
themthatway.Instead,shepointsoutthecomplexstructureofvictimizationwithin
regionallanguagesaswell.FOrinstance,observinghowpeoplefromOkinawawere
treatedonthemainland,sheclaims,.6Becauseoftheirspokenlanguage,thosewholeft
OkinawafOrtheJapanesemainlandhavebeenoppressedandsegregatedinmanydiffer-
entplaces,eveninaplacelikeacoal-miningtOwninKyushuwherenobodyisnative''
(Morisaki,.GMinshukotoba''32).SucharecOgnitionisseeninheressayregardingthe
open-airburialinYoron,too・MorisakiseesherinfOrmant-anoldwomanwhousedtoliveinYoronandwhomovedenmassewithothersaroundl900toworkattheMitsui
MiikecoalmnesinKyushu,Japan'slargestcoalmine,whichplayedamajorroleinpro-
mOtingthenation'sindustrializationfromthel880suntilotherfOssilfUelstookoverin
thel950s-asnotsomuchavictimofmodernizationasavictimoflinguisticsegrega-
tion.Morisakiasks"ifthegreatestsufferingin[theoldwomanandherhusband'sllives
aftertheirrelocatingtothemainlandisnotbeingabletoutterYoron'snativewordsof
celebrationシ〃肋e加肋e〃肋e加肋e,infrontofstrangers,ratherthanthecapitalistic
exploitation''(Morisaki,"Seinohajimari''29-30).
Likethis,MorisakipOintsoutthestructureofvictimswithinvictims.Yet,again,her
attentionisnotdirectedtowardssuchachainofvictimization,assheclaims:@6AfUn-
damentalbasisonwhichtofacethepowerthatsuppresseslanguagesisnOtmerely
concernedwiththepowerconfigurationofacentrallanguagevs.regionallanguages
(Morisaki,"Minshukotoba"39).Herinterestisnotinthepowerstructureoftheoppress-
ingvs.theoppressed,whetheritisbetweenaregionallanguageandastandardlanguage
orbetweenregionallanguages.Instead,Morisaki'sattentionisOrientedtowardsalarger
linguisticmatrixwithinwhichdifferentlanguageswouldnegotiateandaccepteachother.
ThefbllowingpassageregardingpoliticalandgeneralperceptionsofOkinawaillustratesherstanceassuch:
...didthemainland'sperceptionofOkinawadifferfromthedonnantpower'sperception
ofOkinawa?..、didthegeneralpublicreallytrytofacepeopleinOkinawaindependently
andintegratethemeaningoftheiranti-powerprotestwiththeirownhistoryaswellasthatof
Okinawa?Unlesstheydidso,theycouldnotovercometheirnarrownesstocreateaworld
38