Total mercury, organic mercury and selenium in liver and kidney of a South American coastal dolphin
Mercury Emission and REmoval
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
7 -
download
0
Transcript of Mercury Emission and REmoval
Table of Contents1. Introduction......................................................1
1.1. Mercury in Natural Gas.......................................1
1.2. Levels of mercury in natural gas.............................11.3. Mercury in Crude Oil.........................................1
2. Permissible Limit of Mercury....................................13. Hazardous Effects caused by mercury............................1
3.1. Elemental mercury effects....................................13.2. Effects of other mercury compounds (inorganic and organic)...1
3.3. Environmental Effects........................................13.4. Hazardous Effects caused by methyl mercury...................1
3.5. Impacts of Mercury on gas processing operations:.............14. Mercury Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas.....................1
4.1. Mercury Emissions to Water...................................14.2. Refinery Wastewater..........................................1
4.3. Mercury Emissions to Air.....................................14.4. Mercury Streams Emissions via Solid Waste....................1
5. Mercury Removal Process Options.................................15.1. Regenerative adsorbents for mercury removal..................1
5.2. Non-regenerative adsorbents for mercury removal..............15.2.1. Liquids carry-over onto sulphur-impregnated activated carbon
15.2.2. Reclaiming mercury from spent adsorbents Activated carbon. .1
5.2.3. Metal sulphides............................................16. Mercury Waste Treatment and Recovery Methods....................1
6.1. Environmental Management of Mercury Wastes...................16.2. Environmental Management of Mercury Wastes Disposal Operation 1
6.3. Environmental Management of Mercury Treatment Methodology....1
1 | P a g e
7. Conclusion......................................................18. Recommendations...................................................1
9. Glossary..........................................................110. References......................................................1
2 | P a g e
Mercury Emissions from CrudeOil & Natural Gas & MercuryRemoval techniques
1.IntroductionMercury is a heavy, silvery-white metal. As compared to other
metals, it is a poor conductor of heat, but a fair conductor of
electricity. Mercury has a freezing point of −38.83°C and a
boiling point of 356.73°C, both exceptionally low for a metal,
and it is the only elemental metal known to melt at a generally
cold temperature. Mercury is a trace component of all geologic
hydrocarbons. Its origin relative to the origin of the oil and
gas in which it is found, and the geological reasons for its
occurrence in the various types of fossil fuels are largely
unexplored topics.
Methyl mercury is a much more toxic compound that forms when
mercury binds with organic molecules in the environment. This
usually happens when mercury is released into the atmosphere
through burning and settles into wetlands or streams, where it
can be taken up by aquatic life.
1.1. Mercury in Natural Gas Mercury in most forms (species) is toxic and contributes to
health, safety, and environmental risks. In natural gas, mercury
occurs as the metallic form (species). Various forms of mercury—
3 | P a g e
elemental, organometallic, and inorganic salt— can be present in
natural gas condensates, depending on the origin of the
condensates. Knowledge of the different species and total mercury
content in condensates is important, because the damage caused to
industrial facilities, particularly petrochemical plants, by the
presence of mercury can be financially crippling.
In 1973, recognition of the effects of mercury in natural gas
occurred when a catastrophic failure of aluminum heat exchangers
occurred at the Skikda LNG plant in Algeria (Spiric 2001). [1]
1.2. Levels of mercury in natural gas Different areas of the world have varying levels of mercury in
their natural gas reservoirs. Figure 2 shows average mercury
levels that have been reported to UOP. In recent years, mercury
levels have increased from typical highs of 30 or 40 ug/Nm3 to
levels exceeding 1000 ug/Nm3 in the Pacific Rim area. With a
greater understanding of levels in specific geographical areas
has come a greater level of expectation in terms of what is
required to remove mercury both on- and off-shore in a variety of
locations worldwide.
4 | P a g e
1.3. Mercury in Crude Oil Crude oil contains both dissolved and suspended mercury compounds
and, although analysis for total mercury in crude oil yields the
sum of both forms, the concentration of suspended forms that is
obtained from sampling crude oil is highly dependent on the
location that samples are taken in the production and refining
process. Furthermore, given that the fates of suspended forms
(HgS) and dissolved forms are different, the concentration of
each is important to predicting the fate of mercury in a
refinery.
Mercury in crude oil has received more scrutiny as refineries
seek “cleaner” oil for their product streams. Among the problems
cited are: excessive levels of mercury in wastewater streams,
preventing discharge in open rivers or oceans; mercury
contamination of products generated from the refinery streams,
such as gas streams, liquefied petroleum gas, and light or heavy5 | P a g e
distillate products; hydro treating catalyst poisoning or
contamination in refined streams because of metal amalgamation;
corrosion of equipment because of metal embrittlement; and
additional expenses in upstream and downstream facilities because
of special disposal requirements for contaminated mud from tanks,
cleaning of equipment and ships, and restricted product shipping
alternatives.
Fig: 1 Types of mercury associated with hydrocarbon streams
2. Permissible Limit of MercuryPakistan’s Scenario
Municipal and Liquid Industrial Effluents 0.01 mg/1
Industrial Gaseous Emissions 10 mg/nm3
In Drinking Water < 0.001mg/l
3.Hazardous Effects caused by mercury
6 | P a g e
Mercury is one of the major toxic elements found in waste from
oil and gas industries. It is available in all forms. Due to its
abundant availability, it has a wide range of environmental and
health impacts. Once disposed into atmosphere, it starts
transforming continuously into various other forms. It also moves
upward in food chain causing various health hazards. Mercury is
naturally occurring metal, which has several forms. Under normal
condition of temperature and pressure, it exists in liquid form,
When heated it can be transferred to gaseous state. In
combination with other elements it is available in inorganic and
organic form. Organic mercury (methyl mercury) is most dangerous
compound that is of great concern for the present situation. The
most important factor to be considered is that it can be re-
emitted into atmosphere once it is deposited in earth surface.
When mercury enters into the atmosphere, it starts to get
transformed into another form. Metallic mercury once deposited in
bottom of water bodies can be remobilized and introduced into
aquatic cycle through physical, chemical process, and largely
through microbial process. When uptake of a toxic metal occurs,
microorganisms are frequently able to perform detoxification,
yielding a product that can be more toxic to higher organisms.
This is particularly true in the bacterial production of methyl
mercury, a compound 1000 times more toxic to man than metallic
mercury.
3.1. Elemental mercury effects
7 | P a g e
Elemental (metallic) mercury primarily causes health effects when
it is breathed as a vapor where it can be absorbed through the
lungs. These exposures can occur when elemental mercury is
spilled or products that contain elemental mercury break and
expose mercury to the air, particularly in warm or poorly-
ventilated indoor spaces. Symptoms include these: tremors;
emotional changes (e.g., mood swings, irritability, nervousness,
excessive shyness); insomnia; neuromuscular changes (such as
weakness, muscle atrophy, twitching); headaches; disturbances in
sensations; changes in nerve responses; performance deficits on
tests of cognitive function. At higher exposures there may be
kidney effects, respiratory failure and death. People concerned
about their exposure to elemental mercury should consult their
physician.
3.2. Effects of other mercury compounds (inorganic and
organic)High exposures to inorganic mercury may result in damage to the
gastrointestinal tract, the nervous system, and the kidneys. Both
inorganic and organic mercury compounds are absorbed through the
gastrointestinal tract and affect other systems via this route.
However, organic mercury compounds are more readily absorbed via
ingestion than inorganic mercury compounds.
Symptoms of high exposures to inorganic mercury include: skin
rashes and dermatitis; mood swings; memory loss; mental
8 | P a g e
disturbances; and muscle weakness. People concerned about their
exposure to inorganic mercury should consult their physician.
3.3. Environmental Effects
3.3.1. Fate and Transport and Ecological Effects of Mercury
Mercury in the air may settle into water bodies and affect water
quality. This airborne mercury can fall to the ground in
raindrops, in dust, or simply due to gravity (known as “air
deposition”). After the mercury falls, it can end up in streams,
lakes, or estuaries, where it can be transferred to methyl
mercury through microbial activity. Methyl mercury accumulates in
fish at levels that may harm the fish and the other animals that
eat them. Mercury deposition in a given area depends on mercury
emitted from local, regional, national, and international
sources. The amount of methyl mercury in fish in different water
bodies is a function of a number of factors, including the amount
of mercury deposited from the atmosphere, local non-air releases
of mercury, naturally occurring mercury in soils, the physical,
biological, and chemical properties of different water bodies and
the age, size and types of food the fish eats. This explains why
fish from lakes with similar local sources of methyl mercury can
have significantly different methyl mercury concentrations.
9 | P a g e
3.4. Hazardous Effects caused by methyl mercuryMethyl mercury easily gets into tissues of the plants and
animals. For decade, large amounts of mercury were directly
discharged into lakes and rivers. Local discharges led to high
mercury concentrations in fish. Compared to mercury, methyl-
mercury is more easily absorbed by fish and other aquatic fauna,
either directly through the gills or by ingesting of contaminated
aquatic plants and animals. This could further move to human and
other animals through food chain causing various physical and
disorder. Several end points, including late walking, late
talking, nervous system dysfunctioning, and delayed mental
development can be seen in children who are exposed to high level
of methyl mercury. Impact on central nervous system, reproduction
system, immune system, genotoxic effects are some of the impacts
of methyl mercury toxicity. High levels of methyl mercury
exposure can cause debilitating nervous system damage and
eventually lead to coma and death. Because methyl mercury readily
crosses the placenta, fetuses can have levels 30 times higher
than their mothers. The Food and Drug Administration says its
methyl mercury standard for fish of 1 part per million is 10
times lower than the level at which toxic effects - numbness in
the arms and legs, slurred speech and difficulty in walking - are
readily observed in adults.
The Environmental Protection Agency has a standard of mercury
exposure that is four times stricter than FDA's limit. The
National Academy of Sciences, a federal round table of eminent
10 | P a g e
scientists, has endorsed the EPA standard, saying that even low
levels of methyl mercury exposure can cause neurological defects
in the fetus and lead to heart disease in adults.
3.5. Impacts of Mercury on gas processing operations:Mercury was found to produce several impacts on gas processing
operations. They include;
Mercury deposits in cryogenic fractionation equipment
causing cracking of welds in the headers of aluminum
exchangers. Mercury readily wets most surfaces and forms
amalgams with a number of metals. A particular concern is
aluminium, because it is widely used in cryogenic heat
exchangers. This is a potentially reactive metal protected
from attack by air and water by an oxide layer. If the
protective oxide layer is damaged (say, by a small scratch)
and liquid mercury is present, an amalgam is formed, which
will allow rapid reaction with air or water:
Hg + Al → Hg(Al)
Hg(Al) + 6H2O → Al2O3.3H2O + H2 + Hg
Mercury contaminates gas treatment processes such as
molecular sieve and glycol dehydration units, chloride
removal systems, and acid gas removal systems.
Mercury sorbent materials, when spent, constitute a
generated hazardous waste that plant operators must store or
process for disposal.
Mercury poisons catalysts in ethylene, aromatics and olefins
manufacture.11 | P a g e
Mercury contaminations of equipment pose.
4. Mercury Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas
Production and Processing
Mercury in produced hydrocarbons may escape to the environment by
several avenues of egress. These avenues may be generally
categorized as wastewater, solid waste streams and air emissions.
Waste waters originate in production operations in the form of
produced water and in refining and gas processing as wastewater.
Solid waste streams are generated in production, transportation
and in refining. Air emissions originate from fugitive emissions
from process equipment and from combustion, with combustion
thought to be vastly dominant as a possible avenue by which
mercury in oil and gas may be transferred from produced
hydrocarbons to the environment.
The industry distinguishes between upstream and downstream
operations. The upstream category refers to primary production
and whatever processing is necessary to place the produced fluids
in the transportation system. The term downstream operations
refer to refining and gas processing to produce salable products.
Natural gas is transported exclusively via pipeline while crude
oil is transported by a variety of ways with pipelines and
tankers conveying the overwhelming majority.
4.1. Mercury Emissions to WaterThe main wastewater streams that derive from petroleum production
and processing are produce d water from both oil and gas
12 | P a g e
production and refinery waste waters. Very minor amounts of water
(relative to produced water and refinery wastewater) derive from
gas processing and these are mainly water from separators at gas
plants (essentially produced waters) and condensed water from
dehydration. No wastewater streams originate from transportation
systems other than the very small amounts that come from pipeline
pigging operations and tanker ballast. The discussion that
follows will concentrate on the major streams as mercury in water
data are not reported for the minor sources.
4.1.1. Produced Water
Normal production operations of both crude oil and natural gas
involve primary separation of water, gas and oil. Separated water
(referred to as produced water when separated close to the well)
is either discharged (to an ocean, lake or stream or evaporation
pond) or re-injected (usually to the formation it came from).
Reinjection is utilized to enhance oil recovery (EOR) or to
comply with regulatory requirements stemming from environmental
concerns.
Only limited data are available concerning mercury in produced
waters and essentially none concerning Specification. Produced
waters may contain suspended HgS, elemental Hg0 and/or oxidized
forms but the relative amounts in any produced waters are not
reported relative to the forms that occur in co-produced
hydrocarbons. HgS and Hg0 are the dominant forms found in
produced water associated with gas production in the Gulf of
Thailand (Frankiewicz and Tussaneyakul 1997). [3]
13 | P a g e
Gas condensates originating in the Gulf of Thailand contain
between 100 and 1000 ppb total mercury (mostly elemental). The
mercury species present in produced waters are unknown but likely
include higher percentages of suspended forms (HgS) and ionic
forms than the produced crude oil.
4.2. Refinery Wastewater Most of the mercury in refinery waste water is derived from crude
oil. In desalter applications, water is mixed with the crude to
scrub soluble chlorides. If chlorides were not removed, hydrogen
chloride could be formed downstream and lead to corrosion. Other
contaminates removed by the water are soluble mercury compounds,
inorganic salts, elemental mercury and other heavy metals.
The chemical compositions of refinery waste waters vary widely,
as do the volumes of water (per barrel of oil processed) produced
by refineries. Major water compositional differences stem from
process configuration (products produced) and from the type of
crude oil that is processed (high sulfur crude, sweet crude). The
wastewater that enters water treatment systems at refineries is a
composite of water discharges from individual processing units
that differ in type and function. Water streams from process
units are differentiated and categorized as waters that contact
hydrocarbons (including condensed steam from stripping) and
cooling waters that typically do not contact hydrocarbons
directly but may contain some hydrocarbon contamination from
leakage. Total mercury at up to 1 ppb, species unknown (Ruddy
1982) [4]. Specification of mercury in refinery wastewater is
14 | P a g e
largely unknown. Post-biological treatment waters from municipal
sewage treatment (similar in process to refinery biological water
treatment) generates mercury compound specification such that
less than 5 percent (of the total mercury concentration) exists
as monomethylmercury, less than 0.01 percent as dialkylmercury,
less than 0.1 percent as Hg0 , possibly 10-30 percent suspended
particulate Hg, less than 10 percent labile Hg(2+), and between
60 and 90 as organochelated Hg(2+). The concentration of total
mercury in effluents from (municipal) sewage treatment facilities
is in the range of 5-20 ng/L (Bloom and Falke 1996). [5] The mean
and range of mercury concentration in refinery wastewater cannot
be stated with certainty. Very little information is available in
the published literature that speaks directly to this issue. The
EPA study of refinery effluents from the early 80’s (Ruddy 1982)
provides a mean close to 1 ppb but the methodology to arrive at
this number is poorly documented.
4.3. Mercury Emissions to Air The primary opportunities for atmospheric emissions of mercury in
oil and gas production and processing operations are fuel
combustion, mercury in fugitive emissions and gas flares at
primary production operations.
The amount of mercury in such emissions is not known, a rough
estimate is possible. The distribution of mercury in oil to
vented gases can determined by Henry’s law. Henry’s constant for
mercury in oil is the solubility divided by the vapor pressure (2
ppm/25 mg/m3). The upper limit amount of mercury in 1 million
15 | P a g e
metric tons (1.5 billion m3 methane) would be no greater than
approximately 185 kg if the mean mercury in oil concentration is
10 ppb.
4.4. Mercury Streams Emissions via Solid Waste Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C.
321), materials containing mercury or mercury compounds are
regulated as hazardous solid waste if they meet the regulatory
definition of solid waste and the definition of hazardous waste.
The hazardous category is achieved if the material exhibits
either a defined characteristic or is specifically listed by EPA
as hazardous.
Solid wastes directly associated with exploration and crude oil
or natural gas production are exempted from regulation as
hazardous wastes. The exempted categories include drilling fluids
and other wastes directly related to production. For this reason,
such wastes are infrequently scrutinized for metals content and
data are scarce upon which one might estimate the totals for this
category.
Wastes are designated as characteristically hazardous based on
the concentration of mercury in waste leachate as determined by
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Refinery
solid waste streams are routinely examined using TCLP for metals
leachability characteristics and treated according to RCRA
requirements.
Filby and various colleagues (Shah, Filby and Haller 1970, Filby
and Shah 1975, Hitchon, Filby and Shah 1975, Hitchon and Filby
16 | P a g e
1983) [6] measured mercury in crude oils using neutron activation
analysis. This early work was directed to associating chemical
characteristics of crude oil with geologic origin for exploration
purposes.
Musa et al. (1995) [7] reported total mercury in Libyan crude oils
to be in the range of 0.1 to 12 ppb.
5. Mercury Removal Process Options The global market has a number of approaches for mercury removal.
These options can be categorized as regenerative adsorbents and
non- regenerative adsorbent solutions for mercury contaminant
removal.
5.1. Regenerative adsorbents for mercury removalThe protection of aluminium heat exchangers can be accomplished
using a layer of silver-containing molecular sieve inside the
dehydration vessels. The active silver forms an amalgam with the
mercury, and its zeolitic substrate adsorbs moisture in the gas
to be treated.
17 | P a g e
Fig: 3 Generative Absorbent for Mercury Removal
5.2. Non-regenerative adsorbents for mercury removal There are two types of non-regenerative MRU: carbon systems and
metal sulphide beds. The common and traditional approach to
mercury removal has historically been through the use of sulphur-
impregnated carbon beds. Existing sulphur-impregnated activated
carbon options tend to be less effective at positions upstream of
molecular in the gas phase sieve drying systems or glycol
injection due to the risk of capillary condensation in the
position utilization micropores of the carbon sub-structure. The
pore size distribution of carbon products is such that this has
been problematic in the past, particularly where MRU locations
have been in the up-front position, where raw gas is often at or
close to its dew point and entrained liquids are common. This is18 | P a g e
where fixed-bed, metallic-based MRU products find greatest
success in their ability to treat “wet” gas streams in up-front
positions. Non-regenerative metal sulphides can successfully
remove mercury from raw gas, upstream of the amine unit and the
dehydration vessels. Utilizing larger MRU vessels, this approach
protects the brazed aluminum heat exchanger and ensures
significantly less mercury contamination in and around the
process plant. This option has become increasingly popular, since
it minimizes the total mercury present before there is any
opportunity for mercury to migrate to various locations within a
gas processing plant and avoids the risk of subsequent
partitioning into processed natural gas and condensate streams.[2] It also avoids subsequent adsorption onto any pipe asset or
piece of equipment downstream.
19 | P a g e
Fig: 4 Non-Regenerative Absorbent for Mercury Removal
5.2.1. Liquids carry-over onto sulphur-impregnated activated carbon
The degree of liquid adsorbed onto carbon during the life of a
sulphur-impregnated carbon-based MRU is shown in Table 2.
Impact of liquids on mercury removal using activated
carbon
Bed
position
Total
volati
les
(200°C
),wt%
Total S,
wt% (dry
basis)
Total
Hg, wt%
(dry
basis)
Hg/S on
w/w
basis
Hg/S on
a molar
basis,%
% Sulphur
utilization
Layer 1 21.1 7.02 1.89 0.27 0.0429 4.29Layer 2 21.0 6.57 1.71 0.26 0.0414 4.14Layer 3 26.8 8.32 2.12 0.25 0.0406 4.06Layer 4 24.4 7.97 0.29 0.04 0.0057 0.57
The MRU can be shown in terms of total wt% volatiles
(200°C).Layer 1 represents carbon recovered from the inlet
portion of the bed, and layers 2, 3 and 4 represent subsequent
layers. Each layer was bagged upon discharge, following a
lifetime measured in months rather than years, as per design. The
total wt% of active sulphur was measured on each layer of
discharged carbon. While sulphur levels on newly installed
activated carbon are typically 10-18 wt%, the levels on the spent
20 | P a g e
material were measured at 6-9 wt%. In order to measure the
mercury removal efficiency of sulphur-impregnated activated
carbon, the percentage of utilized sulphur was also
measured .This is where on a molar basis. The percentage of
sulphur utilized in the equilibrium section of the vessel (layers
1, 2 and 3) was measured at ~4 wt%. By comparison, on a dry
natural gas without the attendant issues of liquid entrainment,
this percentage utilization would be expected to be >>10 wt%. The
data confirm that sulphur-impregnated activated carbon is prone
to sulphur dissolution and micropore blocking when treating wet
gas.
The data also strongly suggest that the carbon has co-adsorbed a
significant quantity of liquid (20-30%) from the raw natural gas.
This contributed to its shortened service life.
5.2.2. Reclaiming mercury from spent adsorbents Activated carbon
After the carbon is discharged from an MRU, it is usually sent to
a specialized plant, where mercury is reclaimed via vacuum
distillation. There is no useful purpose for the remaining carbon
and it undergoes high-temperature incineration.
5.2.3. Metal sulphides Specialized processes are used for mercury reclaiming from metal
sulphides. For both carbon-based and metal sulphide-based
adsorbents, controls are in place to ship material
internationally from source (gas processing bagged upon
21 | P a g e
discharge, following a lifetime meas- plant) to destination
(reclaim facility). The paperwork and experience required to
accomplish such transportation is complex and on each layer of
discharged carbon. While sulphur requires very careful
consideration.
6. Mercury Waste Treatment and Recovery Methods Mercury waste, once identified, must be treated prior to disposal
of residue or debris to avoid the long-term liabilities of burial
or storage. Hydrocarbon sludge is normally higher in mercury
content than the process fluid from which it was deposited. The
reason is that elemental and organic mercury has higher molecular
weight organic compounds. Moreover one technology is not
sufficient to completely treat mercury waste. Often a combination
of physical, chemical, immobilization, thermal, electrolytic and
in situ verification treatment methods need to be used.
Due to the presence hydrocarbon matrix in sludge, the sludge is
one of the more difficult waste materials to process for
treatment and disposal.
Mercury waste can be treated and disposed by,
1. Recovery / recycle / reuse
2. Physical / chemical treatment
3. Incineration
Recycling methods can be gravity separation, filtration,
distillation, solvent, chemical regeneration etc. Physical
methods could be neutralization, precipitation / separation and
22 | P a g e
detoxification (chemical). In incineration, the waste is burnt at
medium / high temperatures.
Various researchers have conducted researches on treatment of
mercury laden waste and have found some success to reduce and
recovery mercury from the waste.
Thermal treatmentThermal process is considered as an alternative technology for the
treatment of mercury contaminated waste. Thermal treatment is
viewed as a distillation process at controlled Temperature and
reactor conditions, in which mercury vapor is condensed and
collected in relatively pure form. The normal practice for thermal
treatment is incineration and pyrolysis.
Table 3: Summary of mercury waste treatment and recovery by
thermal treatment method.
Origin andcharacteristics
of waste
Treatment methods Results
Soil contaminated
with high level
of mercury such
as in metering of
Natural gas
sites.
Prototype thermal
treatment process,
chemical leaching
process, combination of
physical separation
/Chemical leaching
process.
Chemical treatment combined
with physical separation
process is most effective.
Hazardous waste
of organic nature
Use of moderate
temperature for Thermal
treatment.
The method can handle soils
And dewatered sludge.
23 | P a g e
Mercury
contaminated
Waste
Pretreatment, volume
reduction and high
temperature oxidation
(10000C)
Good recovery with
decomposition of all
mercury Compounds.
Mercury
contaminated
Sludge.
Components: furnace,
heat exchanger, gas
purifier carbon, and
vacuum pump
99% pure mercury received
6.1. Environmental Management of Mercury Wastes Developing Inventory Of Mercury Containing Materials, Equipment
And Wastes
Conducting Environmental Surveys
Reduction of Mercury Emissions
Introduction of Alternatives
Encouraging Recovery, Reuse And Recycling of Mercury Materials
Enhancing Role of Environment Protection Agencies (EPA) For
Management of Mercury
Reduction In Mining of Mercury
Mercury Free Health Care Facilities
Mass Awareness Programmes
6.2. Environmental Management of Mercury Wastes Disposal Operation
Deposit into or on to land
o Mercury waste under uncontrolled waste mechanism
o Mercury waste mixed with other solid wastes
o Stabilized/solidified mercury waste
o Mercury contained in residue/ash of incineration
24 | P a g e
Land treatment
Deep injection
Surface impoundment
Temporary storage
Long term storage of mercury waste
6.3. Environmental Management of Mercury Treatment Methodology
General Steps
Pre Treatment
Roast Treatment
Retort Treatment
Additional Treatment Technologies
o Chemical Oxidation
o Chemical Leaching
o Ion Exchange
o Amalgamation
Land Filling
7. ConclusionMercury is a trace contaminant in crude oil and petroleum
products in the part per billion levels.
It can be encountered in a variety of forms and vary from one
source to another. Over a period of time, possibilities include
settling, amalgamations or other forms of concentration.
Crude oil is common in our industry. Mercury is one of the major
toxic elements found in waste from oil and gas industries. Due to
its abundant availability, it has a wide range of environmental
and health impacts. Once disposed into atmosphere, it starts
25 | P a g e
transforming continuously into various other forms. It also moves
upward in food chain causing various health hazards. So we have
to remove mercury from crude oil and natural oil to avoid these
environmental and health impacts.
8.Recommendations Enforce Provision of Basel Convention
Formulate and Promulgate National Legislation
Develop Mercury Relevant NEQS
Establish National Mercury and Heavy Metals R&d Centers
Minimize Generation of Mercury Wastes
Apply Management Practices for Curbing Mercury Release Into
Environment.
9.GlossaryActivated Carbon is a form of carbon that has been processed
to make it extremely porous and thus to havea very large surface area available foradsorption and chemical reactions.
Amalgamation is the process of combining or unitingmultiple entities into one form. Amalgamationcombines mercury and another element tocreate amalgam (chemistry), used indentistry, chemistry, and mining.
Basel convention The Basel Convention on the Control ofTransboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastesand Their Disposal, usually known as theBasel Convention, is an international treaty
26 | P a g e
that was designed to reduce the movements ofhazardous waste between nations, andspecifically to prevent transfer of hazardouswaste from developed to less developedcountries (LDCs).
Disinfection the act of disinfecting, using specializedcleansing techniques that destroy or preventgrowth of organisms capable of infection.
Genotoxic a toxic agent that damages DNA molecules in genes, causing mutations, tumors, etc.
Hydrotreating Oil refinery catalytic process in whichhydrogen is contacted with petroleumintermediate or product streams to removeimpurities, such as oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen,or unsaturated hydrocarbons.
Organometallic pertaining to or noting an organic compound containing a metal or a metalloid linked to carbon.
Pacific Rim area are the lands around the rim of the Pacific Ocean.
Pigging operation in the context of pipelines refers to the practice of using devices known as "pigs" to perform various maintenance operations on a pipeline. This is done without stopping the flow of the product in the pipeline.
Pre Treatment to treat in advance or as part of a
preliminary treatment.
27 | P a g e
Promulgate to make known by open declaration; publish;proclaim formally or put into operation (alaw, decree of a court, etc.).
Roast Treatment / Retort Treatment
Are thermal techniques and the most commonly
used for treating mercury-contaminated waste.
These Operations separate the mercury from
the rest of the waste stream and condense it
for recovery or removal.
Zeolitic any of a group of hydrated silicates ofaluminum with alkali metals, commonlyoccurring as secondary minerals in cavitiesin basic volcanic rocks: used for theirmolecular sieve properties because theyundergo dehydration with little or no changein crystal structure.
Abbreviation
FDA Food and Drug Administration
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
MRU Mercury Removal Unit
NEQs National Environmental Quality Standards
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
R & D centres Research and Development centres
TCLP Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
UOP Universal Oil Products
28 | P a g e
US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
10. References1. Innovative Approach to the Mercury Control during Natural Gas
Processing by Z. Spiric, INA Naftaplin.
2. Edmonds B, Moorwood R A S, Szcepanski R, Mercury partitioning
in natural gas, GPA European Chapter Meeting, London, March
1996.
3. Frankiewicz, T. C and S. Tussaneyakul, 1997, Upgrading
production facilities on the Funan platform to remove
hydrocarbons and heavy metals from produced water,
Proceedings: Offshore Technology Conference, May 1997, pp.
299-310.
4. Ruddy, D., 1982, Development Document for Effluent Limitations
Guidelines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment
Standards for the Petroleum Refining Point Source Category,
EPA/440/1-82/014 (NTIS PB83-172569), Office of Water
Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC .
5. Bloom, N. S. and A. Falke, 1996, The Importance of Chemical
Speciation in the Assessment and Treatment of Hg, As, and Se
Contaminated Waste Streams, Pacific Northwest Pollution
Control Association Conference, Boise, ID, October 27-30.
6. Filby, R. H., and K. R. Shah, 1975, Neutron Activation Methods
for Trace Metals in Crude Oil, in The Role of Trace Metals in
29 | P a g e
Petroleum, by T. F.Yen, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann
Arbor, MI.
7. Musa, M., Markus, W., Elghondi, A., Etwir, R., Hannan, A., and
E. Arafa, 1995, Neutron Activation Analysis of Major and Trace
Elements in Crude Petroleum, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.,
198(1):17.
8. Oilfield Processing of Petroleum: Crude oil By Francis S.
Manning, Richard E. Thompson (Ph.D).
9. Production Chemicals for the Oil and Gas Industry By Malcolm
A. Kelland.
30 | P a g e