.. . . _...--.__._.~,.-n,-- . ~ . . _ , - - _ - . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

BF

O. . . .

NUREG-4750Vol. 31'

.- Index 1

.. .- '. - ^ : '

'

*,..

.

'~ '

.

_

,

'*

'

' - 4'f[ _.U Y: V -_

.

- ;Y ?sG j: ' .Q. . 't,

..h f~y y ;- Q j _ '' -'

__

hhh- 'f; ( g- (f(- sp.e;4 -;p5

f..h||.- :. P sy gy 4 h

, $|_ jf|g. .- .. '

' ' '' f , .. .

. . a E., , . p,-' "

| (,[ , $[ _i. r yQ( |*;.%-

,

~., ;...

_ :' }rf,

^ '.,

* ' -|y.fff .' - ^ f: ' ''o |'

_

."i- >

.

. y &': i_.)f * }:y., "% z. . _M

. .f, , _ f y { 9,[_y.y_M k: y. . _ 'j J} ,', -.. v;

- .ymm-: .. . - s ;- ? y .. .

,. ' g _gf p:;i...

.-gs [f :. ^/='

..y[ :

''l.-

- .. . c ' " . :o. L < ' ~ .. '.4_ .;

_ ; _ U h-f', ,.. : . . . .- <.;m. .

.'.,'.e'~, ,

%, ' . "' .f,, _:? ..)E..I'$ {;h(, W ? ,*'

s'.-

| '::. ..

. ,. . .4. n y

'!- CY $ |.$$:.., . .+r ,. . n.

.k .j ' M.T M:q %.

a ",e

''g '%

, ' # N. -

3- t,:" r

.

. :

.% ; .p d. '}ih ''d gpfy|

-

' ' '

. -

', ' fr(,Wi ,'dgg f!p gi g; $f . t (Yp'

. J.. . . 7' (',,

. .

.'t. ,;jKhh C. .

. < g y q q.f.. i'h q \ f. uh.L N-- .

. y 'Q:>4]& .|- ,,

a: My| .- . !

4 : '' 't ;, ,

s : ; ';

' 4 - R( 8 ?f,Qg&'!y A%j:;7* > ' . ' , :.![' ' u " in u- ,

|. f_' qy k'a ,

.- . 11 $7<.~ - -f>a

l''

-

'

. . : .. ,

.

_

' . * * := ' jf '.f' - 'G. . . . ff4 L'f_';'..

f*M h4S r||.fss - [ ' .

^'t. . *::

A ,, J [ g ,1 s ' ..;..:

.,9 qW

;3g'R^,gh-*s.,.tDY%y g ggf, ?$; <'. ,. ;; g'- ''4

' 4. - .ini.. ; ;,;~ ' -

,

;i . M..|-- [O ,- ''.'' $ia [#]h'*lL 3 /p g N W s.:g @', _

( w. :.f . jo4 '-

..

., .. . . . - , ;

git WipR.yQ.-.

; ''i.).D,. . m

' *:_W b :45Vw 1,

. -

k ...h{ M s',6- ?

tj y' 3p:.J '

Y-..J .-*

L ' e.%p-

.y g

Q p&g ys1.: c :pprp .~

gb.. .' ~

- w.

'< v. z %c

f 4 ..

. e t.,,; e

.' f*]b . s _ .- (.h. . y .. '.Ih I .z

..

M$ .N N

M{fk:''* g%g:*

" e- -f.4 " . k. . 5 ;4 'g ; .g.?-

9ig Qngg[.Jjy y;% n

M.

~. a. , .. w .- .. ;p%gSg:i '- - ,3 4 :.,. g.j & , , .- % ,-

,

. m: - . M'wT g .jl p . 9 :... g..g.. . afA w^v. 3

M.wsgy n v.y g.;-

, , .

. t-

y. Uthag' . - ~ 'ej- . -

4 gh .jg 'p.h -%%n$$kq,wgggy. . , .

'? . ;* /j.i-.

M ,. n y:*s y n QWggg

M141Q4MS$Nd@W.ngdPS r

I ;-

,! J -y- .y pv wapp nsw- ,4g q.

,. -

s-.

u s wucteaa aEcutcom pokwsston-

- .

-. ... . . -. . .

I' ..

?A,. , - . . . . .~ .

4

9170093 900731=

P NURESO SO R PDR

_

- - - - . - - . _ - _ _ __ _ . _ _ .- - - - _ _ _ . _ _ - _____ _

I~ ,,

7Ie

!

l

Available from 4

..

| Superintentendent of Documents .

U.S. Government Printing OfficePost Office Box 37062

Washington. D.C. 20013-7082<,

A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues,l 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication.

4

p Single copies of this publication: are available from National Technical

'' information Service, Springfield, VA 22161!

',

{t

liig;i!Qid!!$9W. 911 NR'4i

,

)i,

(..

!

-| |

|

Errors in this publication may be reported to the-*

Division of Freedom of information and Pubreations ServicesOffice of Administration

1- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington. DC 20555

'(301/492-8925) !

f,

5

,

..

- - - - -, - - - , .. _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __~ -- _

|i

I

,

'

|

|~NUREG-0750Vol. 31

LF Index 1

,

a:

INDEXES TO Il

NUCLEAR REGULATORY ;

COMMISSION ISSUANCES |;.

I

f

January - March 1990 ;e

e',

!

, -,

r .+

I't=

.

:>

t

i

U S. NUCLE AR REGUL AIORY COMMISSION j

)1

5Prepared by the -, ,

Division of Freedom of information'and Publications Services. " . . _ Office of Administration ,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ;

Washington, DC 20555 i

(301/492-8925)

r

,

'

t 9

_

c

|.,

',

! |

Foreword |

! Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the AtomicSafety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the' Atomic Safety and LicensingBoard Panel (LDP), the Administrative IJiw Judge (AU), the Directurs' Decisions(DD), and tic Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document.,

These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the IJsuances. ;

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:Case name (owner (s) of fxility)Pull text reference (volume and pagination)Issuance numler j

issues raised by appellants ;

Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statute 4)Name of facility, Docket number i

Subject matter of issues and/or rulingsType of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.)Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

%cse information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formatsarranged as follows:

1 Case Name Index ;

he case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of ,

'

the issuances. Each case name is followed by the. type of hearing, the type of,

issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text referen'*.

2, Digests and Headers

ne headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows: !

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), {the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LDP), the Administrative LawJudge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for |

Rulemaking. !

ne header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facilityname, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the reso'ution of the, issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance 4covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are

- designated alphabetically.

;

[

k

lil

,

;

a ;

'

3. Legal Citations Index

nis index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alphanu-merical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others, nese citations i

are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes mayhave occurred to cause changes in the number or name andAr applicability of thecitation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuarK4.

'

De references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally fol-lowed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. s

Dese phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference. ['

4. Subject Index

Subject words andAr phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues andsubjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrasesthat give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuancesbeing indexed. nese phrases are followed by the issuance number and the fulltext reference.

,

$, Facility Index-

De index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from theissuance. De name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, t>w of

*

issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.,

?

!

.

I

lvi

P

.. -- - .. -. _ . ,

'>

- i '

,_

,

. b

|. .

Iiy|

CASE NAME INDEX|w

ADVANCI2) MLDICAL SYSTEM 5 INC-

Y -$PICLAL PROCELD!NO. DiftSION, Ducks No. 3416055 5P, AIAD 929. 3! NRC 271 (1990)11DRIDA MJWER AND LJOITT COMPANY |

OPLRATINO ljCIW51. AMENDMINT; Mf.MORANDtN AND ORDER (Rules an Mauan fur 4

425401A4, Sn251 O!A4Summary D.spassu<m and Damissal of Pmceedmgt ikdes Ncs .

(ASISP No 89 544.01 OLA) (Pressuro-Temperature Lamus). UtPM4, 31 NRC 54 (1940)*OPF.kATING (JCLNSL AMENDMIAT, hG'MORANDUM AND ORDER (Dersyng Peutuni

to luervunek Docka Nem 54250-OLA4, 50 2510LA-4 (ASlJtP No 89 564-01-OLA) g(PressuwTemperature 12rruts), IEP40 5, 31 NRC 73 (1990)

RIQUIST K)R ACl10N, DIRfr!DR'S DECISION UNDI.R 10 C F.R 6 2 7t4 thdoi N<s 50 250, --

54251; D1h00 I, St NRC 377 (1990)OlWl;RAL PUBlJC LTIllI!1E5 NUCLLAR COklORA110N

-

]OPERATINO IJCIWSI AMENDMEf 7, D1iCISION; thdoi No 50 32301A (Dapenal of 1

Acculern Gaiersted Water), A1AB 924 31 NRC 1 (1990) Ftg~t llOUETON LJOIT!1NO AND WJ%T.R COMPANY

I.NFORCEbHNT Ac!10N, ORDER, Docket Nem 50448, 54449 CtJ 941, 31 NRC 131 (1990)i

KERR McOEF CllEMICAL CORPORATIONMATI;RIA!J IJCIW51: AMENDMlWT, INTTIAL DECISION (Rulmg m All Remammg lasues). . 4 d

| Ihdei No 442061-Mi (AEUIP No 83495-01 ML); ISPM9,31 NRC 150 (1990) s

| MATERIAL 5 IJCIWSL AMLNDhENT; MEMORANDUM, [kdei No 4420fil ML; AIAB 928,31 '' : e'

'

NRC 20 (19KI) p'NOlmlERN 31 ATES K)WIX CUMPANY

MATERIALS UCINSli AMENDMlWT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (kequest few flearmg), kIkdet Na 340500t MIA (A$1EP No. 94599-01-MI.) (Dyteodan Matenal 1,6 cense WC

No 22 08799-02k IJIPM3,31 NRC 40 (1990) VPUlllJC SERVICI: COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIURE, a al

#3

'

OPERATINO (JCENSE, Mf.MORANDUM AND ORDER, tkda Nos $4443-01. 50444 OL (OffsneEmergency Planning leaues), A1AB-927, 31 NRC 137 0990), CU 90 2, 31 NRC 197 (1990). - e

* '

ClJ 943,31 NkC 2!9 (1990)OPERATINO UCENSE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rshns an traarveurs' Means to Adnut

,

y

i

| e Late Filed Cesentian and Roopen the Recani Daaeu upon the Wuhdrawal af the Massachuses"

| E.B.S. Netwosk and WCOY) Docket Nim. 50443 OL, 54444cL (ASISP Na 82471-02 OQ . ..

(Offsite Inergency Plannmg); LDP 941, 3l NRC 19 (1990) *e.

OPERATINO UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying traervamrs' Motum to Reopen|Record kegardmg Pmpsmed Amendment to Opernung Luense Arphcaum), Ihdes Nos. 50-443-01.

-

54444 OL (AsulP Na 82 47102-OL) (Offsue Inorgency Plannmg), IJ1P.942, St NRC 38 (1990)ROCKWILL fv"Jud.SNAL CORPORATION

"

MATlht3 tJCI;NSE AMt.NDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Mauun to Strie); Docket ,'n

No. 7425 (ASLitP No 89 594 OL ML) (Specul Nuclear Matenal L2 cense No SNM 21) (Requesi to -. ,

.' 'MA11;RIA13 UCI'NSE AMlWDMihT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI3 (Recermuisrauan: ..

g#Renew to October 1990), LDPM10,31 NRC 293 (1990)

llamewners armi IAPSR), ikdot No 7425 (ASLilP No 39 59441-ML) (special Nuclear Matenal14conne Na SNM 21) (koguan w Renew to October 1990k l HPMll, 31 NRC 320 (1990)

1,

d

.-

'

,

* 1

--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

@"thini-

,) ,

4-1 F 1 .,.

3:7. :.3 '

)rI3_-

'>

.- , .e

C' j-

.k .' ' ' .

#

p,1m.

-| |. , i=

. CASE NAME INDEXs

e ,.

-};;; .S. t

,

1,

SAPImf IJCETT CORPORATION a st' . , , . . :|-

BNIORCEMENT Act10N; ORDER (Denying Muuans to Danans NRC Oudus lasued Mana M 1999,-

': I- : t' : and Ampst 21,1989 fw tack d Jwisdactumk Duska No. 0 % 05980, 0 5 05941. 034 059827-;

W40U35. OSom (AS12P Nes. 69 594010M 2598 01 OM 2h 13P-47,31 NMC 116 .].

1 . i*-

(1990) '- .

,""! RNf0hCE6EDff ACTION; OPD12; Desha Nes. 2405940, 240$981. OS05982, 05408335 '|' .

'

!? 030 05444 (A312P Nas. 3940(LO14M. MS94 014M 2),12P Mt. 31 NRC 143 (1990) ,

'

| VERMOWT YANKEE NUC11.AR POWER LXWlPORATION ' .

h;"I

OPERA 11NO IJCENSE AMENDMENT MEMORANDUM AND COLDER (kdhe en Peddon| for lasse to annarvens Hind by to tese of Venneseth Daska No. 34711CLA-4 (AStAP' '{

i1 ". - No. 9949540-OLA) (Censuusden Pwiad Reserume): IDP 904,31 NRC 45 (1940)'' ' ,

!.

y <,

.i3->

. '

.t,\

~

< ,

cg,

,

1C

_a: ;>

a, .. t

1

-g, .p;,m

,

-. .

- -'

4. . s t(-[ .4.-

.

*6

A i5'' 1 .If 5

4.,; (,

m1,' -

,

e ,, p -

ji

1, ' , [ l

s-

3,W''- .

>

,hj I '

( *.

..

f

5 .I

*| - A{ h,

T

'm't .

,y

5

>

a <; 3 .*''s ,

.

. $

D' 1,

51, <>

0(3

h

fI. ..,t

b

( .' 'f.1

>

+

-t

i

.. k

'I1 .

I-1 -t

..

i .

.

'z , -

?. ?1 -

u' ,

-

I

$u

| .- ?.,

, , -)>

.---.. - _ _ _ _

. - ~ .. . - , _ , ,_

|

|

!| i

|

t

l I

,

! DIG 13TS| 1%UANCE:S OF Tilf NUCLIAR RICUI.ATORY COMMIMION

CLI941 IlOUSTON UOlfl1NO AND POWl:R COMPANY (South Te-mas Projen. Uruu I and 2). DucienNes 50443,54449,ENiollCEMIN!'; February 8,1990. ORDLR

A he Canmissan dames the mauan of Mr John Corder for a primacuve order staymg OsI

enfencernern of an admuustrative sutgeens usued to hun by the NRC Staff an .- w wuh ha concernsand allegauans regar&ng es Seth Tsaas Project. he Camnusman behoves that Mr Conier is an a posiuanto earnply wuh Os subpoena, unwuhatan&ng the pendency of an IO1A request he filed with om NRC,

B The NRC Siaff's requess that an allger presnde to a any concerns that the allager had nas pawidedprovicusly sh<nald not be consuued as an invustum ic allow an aDeger das spurtunity to sevow su gmar i

INRC luff actums an ha previtais emuenn er suegauans, or to goes judgmeru an ths sedmza! correctnessd on NRC 8taff's acuans. Rather, Os purpose of Gw request u to give die alleger Ow Tpanumty toespass concerna to the Staff that he may have fainnd to furmah provsmaaly because of du eusumce of aesttlemani agreemeus, amered anno by the allager and his farner evnployer, whuh may have bean read tomatr,a Gw ausger frten bnngmg lua concerns to Ow agency

C he Comnussian behoves that an sueger need roi swan On prueenaang of a pen &ng POIA (sequest regardmg his pre <ms eswicerns and sugauore in onder su comply wuh an admuustrauwe subpnanarequesung that he prende de NRC wnh informauan an wheder he wuhheld safay earwerns frum er j

,

NRC, developed new twerna smco his isemmatumi nf employment wtih the taoenses, or has an unsrest j'

su the snanner in which ha previously empressed emourns were addressedCtJW2 MilitJC $ERVICE COMPANY OF NEW eaAMPSlilRE, et at (Seabred Statum, Umu I and

2), IMet Nos. 50443 01. SM44-Ol. (Offauo Imergency Plannmg) OPERATINO IJCLNSE; Manh 1. I'

1990. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERA he Casunusian addmsses a cesufned quesuan frtun the Appeal Itoard asekry guulance on whether

tesurney macerrung perucular accident scenanas and thrar projened dose emsequmees u adrmaaible fartaarposes of judgmg the adequacy of an emergency plan. h Cannuasum Juermanes that audi assunmnyis inadnussib'sL ha Commmanan sensamles that emergency plana are no be evaluated a6amst the snaiser. ,

plannm8 sundards of 10 C.FA ($047(b). wtuch are duened towant visarmsble assurance of pr<secuve I

measises I,sr a broad spectrum d acculents.B h rulemakings of 1980 and 1937 estabhah that ernergency planrung as a general maner is

curuidased pan of firstuer (" adequate") prosecuan.C he the purpose of deades whrther proffered testmumy on dose redocum in a specific scensno

ehmald be admiusd as salevant to evaluauan d emergency plannmg. si is inumalanal whether the energencyplarvung regulataans are sensidered fire-tier ("adassais") <a secand-aier ("entra-adequate") protectumi.

D Emergency plar, sng a "essenual" But h a mly commun senes no acknowledge that energencyplans oss a backang, a sac 4md or Ourd hne of dafessas that c<enes into play only in Gw estasnely rate I

cucumstance that engmeared design features and human capacity to take correcuvo seuan have both fallad|to sven a sonous muhap.

E in the tem of su anorgeruy plarams negalauans, m rulernatmas an the subject af emergency |planrung, and an a46,dicsiory decinums muerpreung those regulauana, the Canmusaan has made clear that I

bdgmaua en the adequacy of evnergency planrung are L be based on conformity wuh the plassung standants |set forth in 10 C.FA (50.47(by j

F Nudung m 10 CTR 5047 coruains any suggetum that calculatuna of dose canaaquences am'

intended to play a role in the evaluauan of an emergency plan's adequacy Coruidorauon cf sps.nAc accident

1

1

I

- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4

.-

'

DIGr.STSINSUANCI:5 OF Tile NUCLEAR RE:GULATORY COhl%11SSION

sequences and their patenhal dose camequen es has been rendered unnetmaary by es pnenulgatiah ofgeneric gu; dance that inowpustes and synthesises deu en a range of acciden and emir ennsaiumces.

'O it is by op; dying the gener;c guidance of the sinmen plaruung standante of 10 CJA 50 47(b) to theseview d indsvidual emergency plana - not by suempung to proact the affects of parucular hypotheucaloccidsus occurnng endar particular hypothencal can&tiam of weather, tanw as year, and time of day -Owt the NRC seusfes timelf Out em goal of schieving does ndocums is met.

Il The fmal emergency planning rule, as amended in 1987, thesdd have left htde &nabt as to deCommissian's traers, which may be summanned as follows: Imogency plans are to be evaluated enomtr own merits, against the siateen planning staederds d i0 CIA 6 50.47(b), with pasumpive vehdityeconrded in FEMA's empen judynenu an offsue plaredng; that de evalueuan does not enta0 cansadersuan4 the dase consequences that enight be calculsed under unaus hypenhaucal circummances; and that a plan

. Judged edequate against owne planning standards is ocessidered generally urnparshle to any other plan puthas been found adequate.

I A determinanan of standards of deciaimmaking. mode by rule, is not far individual adjudesuryhnerds to aber, ponie diassusfwd with the rule's appesch ersy pettuan to change os runs, or Owy notsturnpa, by requmung a waiver of the rule, to show why it should na be opphed to a parucular case.

CLJ 90 3 PUllLIC SERVICE (X)MPANY OF NEW ILAMPSilIRE, et at Sembred Stenan, Unlu I and 2),thuket Nos. 50443-01. SM44 014 OPERATINO IJCENSE; March 1,1990, MEMORANDUM ANDORDI'R

A The C .- - decides to allow tha Ausnic Safety and Licewing Bcur(s authoriaanan of e ,

full power bcense far the Seabronk Nucles: Pbwer $tsuan Unh 1 to became effective unde hs regulatima. dunng the pendency of funhar spreals and ether eeninistradve proceedman. In reaching hs imme&ste

effecuveness soview, en Commission danes huervenars' sequest for sehef in die nature of mandamus.Roquests for stays af full power heense authannation are also domed; however, e brief bousekeepng suyis pnwided to permh the fihng of judwiel suy metune.

B By ngulatian and a ing hne of esse pescedent,0w Cannussian has caphcidy retained s,ipervmoryponer to sisi. in et any stage of a pnweedmg to decide any neuer liaalf. See 10 C.FA (231(eX3)(1) and(iX2X0; e s., Pubhc $wvice Co. of New llampahire (Seabrat Station, Unas 1 and 21, CtJm 8,5 NRC

'503, 516 (1977).C 1he NRC's sules pnwide mie estre eisp in the swanght of heensing decisima, ww *unmediate

effectiveness soview? To saplain, when an Atarnic Safety and (Jcensing Board authannes the issuanos ofa heense, Out decision,lih that d 4 tnal enun, need met swen the compience of all spreals to bearnseffecava.

D As a tulo, the effectivenes wview nandnes the sessanabieness of the 11anning Board's decisionwiihout sesching any farmal and Anal deciman that no funhar review and revisian of the decman could -ever be sequued and withcut pejudece to later adjuecoury sesolutie of issues stiD in earuroversy.

E.

1he Caenmissims's "authetiy no innervene and provies guidance in e pending psocee&ng isnot lunited by on norms d 10 Cf.R.1784(a) Desulane statiris n ordmary puence far aview).*o s

Seatewk, Clj.77 8, supra, 5 NkC at $16. The C -- has inherers supemsory authanty nradju&csiory proceedmga, and *ihen is every semian why the Comnuasian ohnuld be empoweved to mer

*

true o proemdmg. , , ,* United staies Energy Research and Develgenent Admmistreuan (Clinch RiverBreeder Reactar Plant), QJ%13,4 NRC 67.75 76 (1976), quoted in Seehnxa, CLJ 77 s, suces,5 NRCat $16.

F Canmission rules de not espressly pnwide for inaneaam mundstory vehef. Ilowever, Os1

Comnussian wnuld be willms to grant sehef of GUs son bi apparnais cueumsunces. Relof in 0w natwoaf mandemus is a drastic remedy, warranted ordy in unusual et - es and endy whose there is a falhus

to ohey a clear duecum to perform a nmdiscretimary esty and where no other phef is swallable.O A review of NRC rules and pnar NRC deemanns does ncs suggest ow esiswnce of any c. lear,

nandiacteuanary duty e Ow pen of the IJcenang Boesd to delay full-power aucumizatim pen &ng .

canpletian of mmand proceedmas er resolution of s!! pu dmg mation. In fact, a soview of prior pecedents '

indicaise past mamples of where, u here, pernuu or hcuses e era suthwired while maand poosedings andnedans were add punang - Seabrook, CtL17 8, supra,5 NRC at $21; Casumers Power Ca (MuDandPlant, Uniu 1 and 2), AI AB-458,7 NRC 155,15940,10 70 (1978); long Island Idahung Co. (Shamham

4

|

i

f, s

'_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l> ,

i

i

DIGl3TSIMUANCE:S Ol' Till' NtK't.l:AN kt:Gt't.ATOkV COMMlfalON

k

fNuclear how $isum, Unit 1),111P 44-55,20 NRC 1531 (19E4). See also Oystershe!! Albance v. NRC,800 F.2d 1201 (D.C. Cu.19h6) (per canam) upholdmg issuance of a full power hcense amwahsund ng ]pendency of enouns to regen. |

11 Where there is e rwnsnd er gendmg nuair A the mauer of leenas a permit issuance mum be,

easidend on a case-by. caw baaia.I 'Ibe authwity of de Board to authorire inriance d e full power hcome ncawlthmandmg pendency

of renands and matimie relating to emergery planrsng issues em be traced to e specific pamsim (10

!C,l'.3L 6 50.47(c)) d de NRC's emergency planrung regulauans. !

J All issues that are relevara to complance wnh 10 C.F.R. I 50.47(b) emergency planrung stamlardsem nas necesastily metonal to bcense issuance because, under 10 CJ lt 6 5a47(c), compbance issuem may'

not be significant and therefoe need not be resolved paar to heerse issunnes.

( K Safsay issues, includmg emergewy planning issues, can be ceieporiud in terms d Ow IJcensingBoard's duty to complete tw proceedmss haalf as opposed to refemns the vnauer to the staff is infamatsesolutaar6

L A hemming board may refer mina mauers that in no wey pennin to the basic fmdmgs necessaryfar issusaco of a heense to the $taff for pist-hearing resoluuan. Censahasted F.dise Ca of New York

i (Indah Pomt, Unit 2), CLJ 74 23,7 AEC 947,95151 (1974k puhhc Semco Ca of Indiane (Marble 11,8 -' Nuclear Genersung Siauan, Unlu I ar.d 2), A1All461,7 NRC 313,318 (1978); lang Island Lighung

Co. (Shosehem Nuclear hmer $natuut, Unit 1), AtAB.788,20 NRC 1102,1139 (1984).M While pannes as invited by our rules to file effecuvenese communs 'mder 10 C.F.It $ 1764, ow

guincipal evenue far sehof fut parues seeking to preclude hemise issuance pendmg spreels in to seek a sisy

und.r 10 C.F.R. I2.788.N of the four stay facmrs, it is well soubbshed that "the snost crucial [ facts)is wheiher irreparable '

injury will be incuned by Os movam obsent a stay " Alabana Power Ca (luesch M. hrley Nuclest Plam.Units I and 2), OJ$1E, I4 NRC 795,797 (198!).

O Canmisamn proceduries thm permit hcenses boards to evaluate whnher a romand need blodauthemadan of a hcense, require all cantantiana efter the original stage to be subject to eenain "umahness"seguiremmas, and allow the Cannussion to swp trae e proceedmg et any stage to efter guidance to theperues are neither unprecedenied nar aberrations; they have been in form ite years and beve been eglied '

,

to numerous aucJear power plars iconsing proceedmas beface dus one,P 1he Canonissimi has maied sepesiedly and esweancelly that li wiu not eensidwr om e

d resources to a e<enplened plam or saber scanamic factors in its decisionmaking an etunpliarca withemergency planning astny ngulauons. Sea, e 3., Sammest Anti-Pulhaion langue v. WRC. 690 F.2d 1025

(D C Or.1985).rung rules, wouldQ AvaQable fedmg will syronimate what,lmder the Comnusuon's f . m

be required far demenmissianing d a plars that had been in opersuan far a lang pened of tame and thatsu.m is fund aufncient to offsa any claan af irreparable injury from led of decenmismaning funds.

R h is well asided that specula,6 . about occunesse d a nuclear accidea dass not onnetituw thek]nd of irreparable ir$ary that would warrant a swy of full.pomer ogeastimia. lig., Oeveland ElectneBluminating Ca (Perry Nuclear Fower Plant Uniu ! and 2), A1AB 520,22 NRC 743,1481620 (1985),etung New York v. NRC,550 F.2d 745,75657 (2d Ctr.1977), and Viginia Sashms Alhance v. llendna,477 l', Som 68, 70 (DAC.1979).

S When es hemming bierd has siahmued and the Canmissaan's immedow effectiveness aviewhas faved beense issuance, Os grant of a sisy would be euntrary to the gebhc imerest which underheethe mandets to the Commissim in 5 U.S C 1558 to cumplete banas opphemian pmceedmgs within areumable time with due regard for the rights d the panies.

l

i'

8 f

,

!

|||

|

|

!l

.. . . .. - - ~ . -. ._. -- . - . . .

-

,

,

N **

k

5

|

I .

DIG k..iTS-

s

ik5t!ANCl:5 OF Till: ATOhllC $AFITY AND IJCIWkING Al?t:Al, BOARD %

g*A .AR 926 OFNIJLA1. IUplJC (ff!!II11.8 NUC1.AR WRM*AllON (thne hide Island Nuclear $6sunn,

Umi 2), thast No $6 3240lA (Depse af Accidernoenereied Weier), OPl;kATING ljCl;N5t. " ,hAMINDh0;hT; January 19,1990 DIX 3510N a

*A he Anoel Dosed affirm. Die licensmg Beerd's decsamn, IJLP-89 7, 29 NRC 138 (1989),

{sinharums e beense amendn me far the seriders-damaged Umt 2 reener ai %ree htte Island The ,

will pernut om evaporstma by ferond heatang swer a ame to two year pened of Ow water Dist jhas accumulated onsSe from the soradent and ensumg desxwuammsunn activtues s

it *An oppellant's toef mise clearly identsfy om erne af fact and law that are Ow subjere of the-

.mmal I,. .~e .mm.x 0. ,_ss ,.r_ ., .e r_.- u,m 6. sumen d e .mer_ ., merrew must also to pneded * 10 C.F.R. ( 2.762(d)(1) {~ - g

C An appellant's 'bnef nmet entsaui sufficient informaten and engent argurnau to alen de other,

g ".

perues and De snistlais inhunal of the presse nature af and surpan far de appellard's claama * Carulma .;a

Ibwer & Laght Co (Shearon liarris Nuclasr Ibwer Plant), AIAll 643,24 NntC 2(XI,264 (1986). Acenni id., ' 4AI Alt.856,24 NRC 402,405 (1966), ed., AIAll.837,23 NRC 525,533 34 (1946), Omnnsylvsma IN=or #

#and light On ($unquehenna $ team 13ectrw Statum, Umta 1 and 2), AIAD 693,16 NkC 952,955 57(1982). fp .? %

D he Appeal Itased wul n<a penarelly consider inauers that are ma adequainly kneled Any guny"

-.

who has insufficiently situ ulated tu clouns must heer full suspmsduhty for any posihte misappehensum ofOmne argenente caused by on inadequaeses of its bruf Lee Gerugia Ibwer Co (Wp'.le 1;lectne Genersung

.

8 x

Plant, Unna 1.md 2), AIAH $72,26 NRC IN,13132 (1987), Wmounam I.leranc lbwer ca (Puun Inese gNuclear Plant, Umu I and 2), AIAB.739,18 NRC 335,338 st4 0953) R

I. De Appeallivard does not hund pm se parues to em amiw standard tw bnals as penas serresersed fby counsel Ses Ibbhc Service !!)ectne & Gas Co (5alem Nuclear Ommratmg Staum, Urut 1), AIAB 650, #

14 NRC 43,50 n.7 098t h aff'd sub man Township of Imer Abaways Creek v Public Servire I:lectne >

& Gas Co., fit? F.2d 732 (3d Cir.1982L JF lasues se argwnmus that ere not made medily smarmt or c<enpehensible by an intervenar's bnef

-''

=01 be deemed to be waived and accordmgly wu1 not be addressed by die Appeal Basrd. $unilarly, when ) *intervmore do aca captam what matenal facts are in &apato, why Gune facts are metanal, and why OsLacensing Board's treatnues d those issues was an emm, the issues a o deemed to be waived.

,

O in reviarms factual fmdman, it is smil settled that the Appeal Board a "not free to essgard * 7em fact that Om lasenamg Daards are the Comnussicn's pimary fact findans tntamala." Nonhern Indiana

'

f.,F

Ibhhc $srvice Co. OistBy Generatmg Station, Nuclear l), AIAD-303,2 NRC 858,467 0975)11 h Appeal Board wGl ordy " reject er modify fmdmas of um licensing Boani if, afier stvsng .4 '

tta decision the poubsuve force it intnnsically enmmands, [the Appeal llosed is) convmoed that the swoordcannpels a different susult" Niagan Whswk Ibwer Carp (Nme kh Ibus Nuclear Suuan, Unit 2),A1AB 264,1 NkC 347, 357 (1975). he Appeal Board "sinst be persuaded diet on acord evidenas -

as a whnle enmpale e different conchmian and [the llaard) wul not overturn the hearug judge's fmdmas~,

aunply because [the lhard) nught have needied a dtiferera mesuh . * Geneal Putdw Utihues Nuclear-,

Corp (Thne kW island Nuclear 86surm. Uma No 1), ALAR 821,26 NRC 465,473 (1987)I he tourden of gang f<rwant mth evsdaus to suppon a ecounuum that a twense er amendrnen

'should not to issued u an es pany asserung sud e eonianuort ihmever, dus burden nwat to distmsmahedfnen the whimate burden af prod si the issue of whether a luonas or lugnae smeubnent shtmld be issued. ., ,

.-.

7*

=

''

,.

..

. . . . . .

- - - -- s. , - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - , - - - . - - - - - - - - - _ - . _ - - - _ - - - - _- - - - - - , - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ - - -- - - - - -

W y ?,

jI ' ' '',7.-i ,

. ,

;j -f'

.: ('

,

n($,

, ,

l FII u

'a

DIGl'.STS *,

ISSUANCE $ Ol' TIIE ATOMIC $Al'ETY AND IJCI'NSING APPEA1, BOARDS ,,

ih ,

2L

@.- which is an the applic.ars. See Consumers Nwer Ca (Madland Piars, Unha 1 and 2), A1Alb123,6 AEC ;i@f ; 331,345 0 9731

J< , : The IJconsing Board's decision, ha suppaning adjudwatory succed, and dw supplemers to-d record d docuton. 104hs I:inal Progranuaatic Impsa Staternent inrm the comptes envi .

C.F.it il 51.102(c),51.lal(c). See philadelphia Dectnc Co. (LJmenck Generating Sution, Unlu I and 2).mALAB 819,22 NRC 681,705 06 (1965), aff'd in part and nyiew otherwies dechned, CLJ 865,23 NRC"~

125 (1986k nmanded in part on uher grands sub nom. Limend Eccingy Act:an. Inc. v. NRC,869 F.2d

119 (3d Cir.1989).,

ALAB-927 PUBaJC $E!WICE COMPANY OF NEW liAMPSIDRE, et at (Seabrunk Statim, Units 1 and2), Docket Nos. 54443 0L,50 444-OL (Offahe Ernesency Pianning lasues); OPERAllNO IJCENSE; ;

February 26,1990, MEMORANDUM ANDORDER *

A De Appeal Board denies en intervenar's mannn to reopen a panian of dw ncard in de operatinglicense proceedmg involving the SabraA nuclear power fac!!sy as enumely and be:ause k does not presenten *saceptimany gave issue," whhin Gw maamns of 10 C.F.R. I 2.734(eXI).

B The Commissian's Rules of Practice emphcidy sequis the damal of an untimely manan to reopena record unless ow motion pasenu *an sacogimauy gave issue." 10 Cf.R. 6 2.734(aXI).

C Where two boensing boards were censiduing differas aspecu of an emergency response alertand nonncation systeen, pendency of reopening motiar before one licensing inani bened en a particular ~event does not excuse delay of tree mmths in fihng a motion to reopsn befuro es second boant basedart the same event because ow list hoard could nat essess $e unpact of est event upon those matters that

'#

were within dw prisection of the seemd board. Cf. Inns Island IJahting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear hwar . ,

'' , Sution, Unit 1), ALAB.902,28 NRC 423,429 (liceswing board can damiss a pony fran mly the pen;4

et the pmceedmg within that boar (s purview), sview declined, C1J 88 11,28 NRC 603 (1984). Thisbcing so, Owre was no patonnst for "the dual litiganan of the sans issue with passibly inconsuient resuha "Pubbc Servios Ca of New llampshire (Seabrod Suunn, Units 1 and 2), AIAB 916,29 NRC 434,4390 989) .

.

AIAB-928 KERR M4EE CllEMICAL CORPORA 110N (West Chicago Ram Eanha Facility), Docket {No 442061.Mla MA1 TRIALS IJCENSE AMENDMINr; March 27,1990; MEMORANDUM

A On March 13,1990,da Appeal Based denied motions far a may of the IJcesms Board's docuinniin ISP 949,31 NRC 150 so), authorinns an amendment to dw n,sierials licese hew by Kerr McGee

permannuly to dupuse of radioactive thorium rnill tailings, other, as ociated wesw, equipment, buDdesrubbis, and contaminated soils. De Appeal Boani issues a monnak an cmtaining the vossans for thatontbar denial

B In ascertaining whrther a suy pendmg appealis warrantad, considerannn must be given to Gw .

'

foDowing writons: ' (a) whether dw moving pany has made a strong showing that it is likely to prevail ond< menu; (b) whether On moving pany wdl be truparshly bdured unless a stay is granted; (c) whether ,

granting e stay would harm other panies; and (d) where the pubhc interest has.10 C.F.R. 6 2.788(e). -C Concermns the stay critari., the bunlan of paroussion is on de mcnmat, and while no ent ;riuna -

is dupositive, *!the most signincent factor in deci&ng whether to grara a suy request is 'whedw' .a.e panysequestmg a stay has shown that h will be irreparsbly inpred miens a stay is gran' / '" 'strnpolitanEdison Cau (11ues Mile taland Nuclear Station, Unit 1), CLJ 8417,20 NRC 801, F ' 44) (quotingWestinghause Electric Corp. (Espons to the Philippines), CLl 414,11 NRC 63 ? *1980)). SeeAlabams Power Co. Qaseph M Farley Nuclear Plant, Urats 1 aml 2), CLJ Bl.27,14 N 1 i95, '97 (1981).

D, Abtelt a suy, an applicant's expen&tures toward 1- , ^ of the pmpused site sharing theappeal process must be taken into secouru in any requimd future analysis sempenng a proposed site toalternative sites.

'E The Commission has held est aheens an applicant's bad faith in tu environmental reponing. *the[ cast-benent) analysis an remand should be dans an the basis of the factual predicate saisting at the timeof en analysia." Public Service Ca of New Itampshin (Seabrook Sution Units 1 and 2), C1J.7b8,5

. NRC 503,532 (1977). Funhermore,"the larger to cammitment of renamtes to one site, the less hkelyh is that an ahernative site wiu semain feasible." Florida Nwer A IJaht Ca (St. Imcie Nuclear powerPlant, Unit Na 2), AIAB.404,5 NRC 1185,1188 (1977). Accordmaly, without a suy, a pany advocatingan ahemative site may be ineparably injured if much time and mcmey will be spent on die proposed site

['i

l a

i

3.

<-

,.

1 ,,

i

|c

||,.

|'1

. _ _ ____ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

D~

t f,

!<- ' .'i ?

i < 3,

'i

5

' DIGESTS'

JISSUANCl:S OF Tile ATOMIC SAITTY AND LICI'NSING APPF.Al, BOAltDS -

,

N .

. -j' pendmg appeal. Sao id. at lill; Pubhe Semco Ca of ladana (Marble 11111 Nuclear Genasting Station,

. y

"

Units I and 2), AIAB-437,6 NRC 630,(34 (1977) .

'

n s F Absent a 6nd ng of irreparable Arduty, an Appeal board may am grani a stay unless "a seversal ,

of the decision armier suack is not marr.ly likely, but a vinual certainty? Cleveland Elearic 11iuminates,

Co. (Pstry Nuclear Ibwer Plant Unita 1 and 2), AIAB.820,22 NRC 743,746 n.8 (1985) See Osners!Pubhc Unlines Nudear Cap. (Three Mils Island Nuclear S ation, Unit 2), AIAB-914,29 NRC 357,341

'(1989)O De mere hating of several grounds far appeal, without mare, is insuffwiers to estabhah that the

.

men ant is 14cly to pressu en the morns.Il %e followind technica! 6ssue is discussed: Ahernais Sites.

;

t

AIAB.929 : ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS,INC. (Ons Factory Row Geneva, Oil 44041), Ducket No. 30-16055-SP, SITCIAL PROCFEDfNu; March 30,1990; DECISION -

A- The AmealBoard accept 'Jeansing Bosn!'s soferralin WIP.89.ll,29 NRC 306 (1989), andseverses $e Board's ruhng eensa he applicability of the Equal Access to Justice Act to materials

1t

license suspension ptoceedess -B- Appeal boards are delegated .,,mmity to sview ruhngs soferred by bcensing boards in proceedmes

. emducted is 'susnt to 10 CF.R. Pan 2 Subren O.10 CEA I 2.785(a), (bXI).

. 4Cy A lu:ensing baani may refer a ruling far insedactaary appellate review when the board determines*

that such eview *is necessary to psevent datament to the pubhc interest er unusual delay or espense * 10

CF.R I2.730(f). 'D An spreal board is not obliged to accept en esferred sulings. See Cermoners Ibwer ca (M dland

Plant, Uiuts 1 and 2), AIAB.634,13 NRC 96 (1981) Rather, tius discrennnary review is sacrcised "only,

w)mre the ruling below either (1) thrutents) the pany adversely affected by it with immediate and seriousirnpamble impset which, at a practical matter, [can)nat be alleviated by a laist areal or (2) affect [s] the '

besic structure of the proceedag in a pervsaive cv unusual manner." Pubhc Service Ca of Indiana (Marb&e i

|.. Ihlt Nuciar Omerstmg Station, Unita i and 2), ALAB,405,5 NRC I190,1192 (1977).E l' von though the Marble 1h11 criieria have not been met, an appeal board may enencise its discistian

and accep a licensus board's referralif the ruhng involves e questian of law, has gensic imphcanana, andhas not been previously addressed on appeal. Sec, eLg., Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Sution Units 1and 2), AIAB487,16 NRC 460,464-65 (1982), av'd in pen on other grounds, CU.g319,17 NRC 1681(1983). See also Rodwou iniematiaial Corp. (Rodsidyne Divisian). ALAB 925,30 NRC 709,712 n.1

' '

(1989). - . --

is F The Equal Access to lusuce Act (EAIA) pmvides that an esency that conducts an advessaryadjudication shan awani suorney's fees to a prevaums pony unless the position of the agency was .

3substantially justined or special cimenss6 aces make an award urQust. 5 U.S.C,6 504(aXI) Aa "advasary

i: edjudicatian* es used in the EAIA is an adjudicanon under secnon 554 of the Administrative Piecedus Act

|| (APA)in which the United States is sopisserned by counsel, but excludes an adjudication for the purposeof estabbahing or 6xing a rate or for the granung er senewing of a licanas, 5 U.S.C. I 504(bXI)(c).

O An adjudication under esciion 554 of the APA is sequired by statale to be determined on the socced'

ahar appanunity for an assney hearing. 5 U.S.C. 4554(a) Sections 554,356, and 557 of the APA setfonh the pr=hss that an agency nest fouow in such a format, an.ths record hearing. 5 U.S.C. 46 554,

E

4' 55 6 557.Il ' A materials hcense suspension paceedmg is aca en " adversary adjudication" for the purposes of

the EAJA because the Asamic Energy Act does not require such a haanns to W en the secord pursuant to j

APA section 554.-

( I h is the enabling statute (Lo., the Atamic Energy Act), and not the APA that determines whetheran en-the.secord hearing is requirect. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. NRC, 727 F.2d 1195,1202 s

;- (D.C. Cir.1984) See United Statse v. ADesheny4mdlum Steel Corp.,406 U.S. 742, M&57 (1972)

|) J In any Jesus ci atatutary interpretation,"the 'stattmg pairn' must be the language of the statuteheelf." 14wis v. United States,445 U.S. 55, 60 (1980) (quatmg Raiser v. Sonotane Corp.,442 U.S. 330,

337 (1979)).K . Whether the wonia *on the secord" or %rmal" heanng swear in a statute is act controlles on the

.I issue af whether an APA section 554 hearing is required. See United States v. Florida East Coast Ry.,410l

t

*r j

9

h .

.

)

,

'

_

- ,

t

' iq_

1,.p ,

DIGI'STS +

ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFl?tY AND IJCENSING APPEAL DOARDS'

U.S. 234,238 0973); Aller *.any ladlum,406 U1 at 757; Seacesst Ant!-Pulhiunn lassue v. Castle,572 -.

R- F.2d 872,876 (1st Cir. *s78) cat denied,439 U.S. 824 (1978); Marathan Oil Co. v. I'PA,564 F.2d 1253, i

| 1263 (9th Cir.19T',. Bis 'in the absave of these magic wonia , , , Cangasa snust clearly indicate auirnas to trigger .no farmal, on-the-reconi heenns prcaisions of the APA." Oty cf West Chicago v. NitC.

ipih Cir.19a0), afr Kev-McGee Corp. (West Oiicago Ram Ea.shs Itcaity), ClJ-G1, '701 F.2d 632,641 a

15 NRC 232 (1982). '

L_ ' noe a nr, statutory requiernant far formal hearings in pmceedms: involving te smnt or ,!.. amendment of a materials licasse. Kerr-McGee,15 NRC at 252M hose is a langstandog sisumptian concerning mactar gerating hcense and censtruction permit :

- cases that es Atarnic Energy Act rapires on the record hearings. See Unim of Canoerned Scieraistav. NRC,735 F 2d 1437,1444 n.12 (D.C Cir.1954), cert datied,469 U.S.1132 (1985).

!

N - Section 181 of the Aiamic Energy Act arecis ihai"[t)he provisims of [the Administradve ProcedureAct] shaR apply to an agency actirsi taken vnder this chapte," encept where classihed informatien isinvolved. 42 U.S.C 4 2231. Dis section alme, however, does not dictate the observance of any particulat

L APA pmcedures. Kerr-McGee,15 NRC at 247 n.13; West Chicago.701 F.2d at 642 & n.8.O Section ll6b of Ao Atomic Energy Act does not requus a formal APA, on the recard hearing for -

license revocation or suspsasjon actions; rather, it mandales that the peuvisians of section 558(c) of the

APA be followed. 42 U.S.C 6 2236(b).,

'P Section 558(c) of the APA provides that (eacept in case of wC1falness or thues in which thepublic hesidt, inserest, or safety mquins otherwise) a beawee must be given wnuen natiae of a groposedwithdrawal, suspension, revocatian, or annulment of a heense end an opportunity to demonstrate or achievecanpliance with su lawful requirunents. 5 U S C 6 558(c1

,

Q Section 558(c) of the APA does not sequim er eenumplas a sectum 554 issanns for licassesuspension or sevocation actions. Causgher & Aacher ca v. Simon,687 F.2d 1067,1074 (7th Cir.19821

R' he NRC has uniturmly provided an opportunity for on-the record hearings in hcase suspension.

pmceeJess. See 10 Cf R. (11202,2.700.-S- . De Canmissian's Rules of Practice pnwide for informal hearings in precondings involving

materials licanes, except for those concerned with enfacement actions, which still. sequin formaledpulication under 10 Cf.R. 66 2 700. et amt 54 Fed. Rg 8269,8270,8276 0989)(to be codined as 10

~

CF.K. I18201).~

'.

T. - 1.mngstandag egency practica annot supply the sututory requirement far a hearing of the formahty -,

spect6cany reptised by me EAIA. Sw West Chicego,101 F.2d at 642. Cf.Rashund Commiscan of Tomas i

v. Unised Stsses,765 F.2d 221,227 24 (D.C, Cir.1985) (even if a proceeding is adjuecamry in natum,section 554 is applicable only if the enabling statute mandates a formal hearing).

U- As a waiver of emereign immunity, the EAIA must be suictly corwtrued. See St. louis Fuel andSupply Ca v. FERC,890 F.2d 446 (D.C Cir.1989); Owens v. Brock,860 F.2d 1363,1366 (6th Cir.1988);

. |Smedberg Machina A Tool,Inc. v. Donovan,730 FAs 1089 (hh Cir.19841V Waivers of sovereign immurmty snust be strictly construed, Action an $ making and lleahh v. CAB,

724 F.2d 211,225 (D.C. Or.1984).W Despite the fact that, although not sequired by stause, an agency raay volussar0y ceruhact formal ~

'

;an.the secord hearings like thans desenbed in section 554 of the APA, the EAIA does not apply to ruch . 1

'i

proceoshngs and snay not serve as the basis for an award of anarney's fees. St. louis hel,890 F.2d at447 51; Owens,860 F.2d at 136667; Smedberg,730 F.2d at 1092 93. Canus Enober Ruis v. INS,838F.2d 1020,1023 30 (9th Cir.1988)(en banc).

-

.

't

'!

-;)t

le

1

[)

t

!

.

-

)

- _ _ _

-- ~e'- _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __.

. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . _ .

. .

e

P

}+"

3

DIGESTS w -

,

15$0ANCF.S OF Tile ATOMIC SAETY AND IJCI:NSING BOARDSe

[EP-941 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW IlAMPSillRE, et al (Seabrook Staban, Units 1 and*2), Docket Nos. 544434)L, 54444-OL (AS!EP No 82-47102OL) (Off=ne Emergency Planningh . ''

OPERATINO UCENSE; January 8,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulms an intervenors'~

Motums to Admit a tare-Fuad Cesenuen and Reopen ow Record Based upon the WithdrawaJ of the ,

Massadeseus E.B.S. Network and WCOY)-

UtP-94 2 PUBlJC SERVICE CX)MPANY OI NEW IIAMPSilIRE, et al. (Seabrook Statim, Unita 1 and .

-

2), Dodet Nos. 54443-OL, 50444 OL (ASLEP No. 82-471020L) (Offsite Emergency Planning),' *

j OPERATINO UCENSE; January 9,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Denyms Intervesurs' Maum - yto Reapon Record Regardmg Prgased Amendment to Operating licaws Apphcaum) Q

iISP-943 NORTilERN STATT.S POWER COMPANY (Pathfinder Atonne Plant), Docket No. 34 05004-" 4

4

MI A (ASLBP Na 90599-01 ML) (Bypeduct Matesal boense No. 224)8799-02), MATT.RIA13 U-,

CENSE AMENDMFNT; January 10,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. $'s s

|| A Whers requestor for standag pnwides no esaus between the injury claimed and the proposed

' ~

hemsing activity % elaam of injury is purely speculauve and legally insuf6cient to estabhah standmg. ,

i *| D A pemm who regulanty comnuates poist the entrance of a power plant site, sought to be decommis- .. .

|smned, rnay be piesurned to have the requante insemst that she might be affected by the decommissuming, ; T

| and meets the judactal standards for standmg under 10 C.F.R. 6 2.1205(g). . M , '.*, . .

| [ AP-944 FIDRIDA POWER AND (JOITT COMPANY (Turkey INant Nuchsar Oenesung Plant, Uraw 3' 'h' and 4), Dudei Nos. 3425401A4,54251 OlA4 (ASIEP No. 89-564-01 OLA)(Pressure-Temperature

unutsk OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; Jamary 16,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER hA he Ucensing Board mastains the pnm issuance of an kn,mediataly affec6ve hcense senendment by "4

i

grantag the Ucensee's Masaan for Seminary Dispasuum on the last contentum remaining in this pmcashimg f|

: The Haamt finds that the intesvenom seek to htigate mauer ausside the acope d the proceeding, fail to ."

adequately estabhsh the esisessme of a A=p==d malenal fact as to those mauers wuhm the scope of Gwproceedma, and seek to impuse testing precedures not required under 10 CF.R. Pen 50. k -

B he purpose of the sonenary dispusnum procedure set out m 10 CF.R. i1749 is to avoid holdmg ,

heenngs an kasues where these is no genuma dispute of mansnal fact. Staiement of Puhey on Conduct of .

Ucensing Pnweedmga, C1J 818,15 NRC 452,457 (1981). See linuaton Ushung and Puwer Cs, (Alles <

Creek Nuclear Generstmg Stauan, Unit 1), AIAB-590,11 NRC 542,550 (1980)." ff.<

C Where a summary dispositum mouan is supported by a%1avit.10 CF.R. ( 2.749(b) reqsures the gW

appasing pany to state specific facts, rather than rely on mere allegauons or desuals, to show diat there is ., :;

a genuine issue of fact. Ahemt audi a showing, sumraary dispossuan will isu if the movant has sataafied ,

i*

tus burden of estabbshmg that no genmne issue as to any matenal far 1 sie.D Appenha il to 10 CF.R. Pan 50 pnwides that reactors . ausgrated survallance program

(ISP) must have "sim0ar" design and operaung features; si does not m,utra identical operating features.10CF.R. Pan 54 Appendia 11, ll.Cl (19891

E Paposals to modify Commission imposed Lesung methodologies that a becnses is authwired andebhgated to follow must be disnussed as an suad on a Comnusmun regulation, and, to the salent theycoautuie a peution for rulemding, are ausside the junsdicuan of a bemams Board

F The followmg ischmcal issues are discussed. Fracture Taughness/Ducubshty; Nemam Fluence.'

s

UlP 945 FIDRIDA POWER AND LJGITT COMPANY (Turkey Poun Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 3,

and 4), Docket Nos 50 254GLA4, 54251 OLA-4 (ASU1P No 89-584-01 OLA) (Pressure Temperature . ..

. .

$ -

11

a

e

4

W , ,

3

L-

i

DIGESTS -ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAETY AND IJCF.NSING BOARDS

'(,

l' IJmiu); OPERATING IJCENSE AMENDMENn January 16, 1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-- (Dmying Pention to Intervene)

A- The IJeansing Bused denies a petitian to irnervene Aled 11 months after the close of the timeI

spoeined in the Notice of Opponunity fur liesting as inoseusably late, and not otherwise jusuned based onIa consideratian of the uther four factors set out at 10 Cf.R.12.714(aXI).i. Whus aB the factors set out at 10 Cf.R. I 2.714(aXI) nmut be cmsidered and none is dispositive,D

the most impanant of the Bye factnra is the presence or absw e ai goM cause" justifymg the lateness ofthe petitiert Abscus * good cause," a pentioner beam a heavy burden to lus:4ry a late intervennan based on

;!the ternaining four factnrs.I

C As a general rule, a decision to maain sDent, and refrain from intervening in a tansly mamer, isnot justincation for s Roaal to permit intervenuen in an untimnly manner, and the IJcesing Board Andsno stauste, regutation, pn' icy statement, or Canmlasion case law that even suggesta that employees of aniaplicant or hcensee sie entitled to a generic exangim from the Cormnissim's procedural rules.

D ' A licensing board does not foreclame the pmaibuity that special facts might exist which would. warrant a depanure frorn the geners! rule that one cannot successfu3y stand on his rigins to fue an untimely ,

'

- petition af er sining on his rights to 61e a timely petitiart llowever,inere sasanians of feave cf retabationdo not estabhsh the type of special facu necessary. - .

,

E A licensing board will ad nasume that the fact ernployee enight have been the victim of retahationaher date fw Ghng timely petition to intervens has passed to infected or ceramund the employee's setionsprior to that date as to sender him effeedvely incapable of entising his rights under the Commissinn's

- sules of practice as protected by sectim 210 of the Enagy Rearsenisatim Act.F Whns newly snsing infamataan has bem nsegnized as * good cause" for a late Aled paitian to

intervene, Consumers Power Co. (Midland Nat, Units I and 2),12P.824. ,16 NRC 571,577 (1982),1

previously avausble infamstian newly acquired by a pet".imer has not Kansas Oss and Electric Co. (WolfCreek Osnarating $istico, Unit l), LitP-8417,19 NRC 378,886 (1934).

.WhGo an early decisim of the Appeal Board suggested that the door was open en the qt,astian'Owhether pubhcation in the Federal Regisier was aufGrient, sunJms alone, to put potential intervennrs on - I'

notice, Pennsylvania Power and llaht Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Sutim, thuts I and 2), ALAB.148,6 Alic 642,643 sL2 (1973), that door was sutesquealy closed in Ten-- Vaney Authority (BrownsFerry Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), AIAB-341,4 NRC 95 (19761 wherein the Apput Board summarQysujected a petition to intervene Sied beymd the paiad specined in the apphcable Feders! Register.

II A claim by a petiriener thatit was laned irso inactinn bortune 0.tshed on asuher pany er suity to *

apnnes tu interesta does not constiuse 'gand cause? See Gulf Sutes Unhties Co. (River Bend Stanon.. Uniu I and 2), A1AB444,6 NRC 760,796 (1977).

, ne esisting panties, the geblic, and the IJeansing Board have e cogniuble intenst in the timely,1 ~

and sederly conduct of licensing psoceedman. %us, the fact that petitumess was prepared to go forwardwith their arguements immediately and that inseventmo would act delay an aheady issued license unendmarsdo not fuuy answer the pohey considaations underlying the Commissim's concerns under the last factor 'of 10 C.P.R. 42.714(a)0). A party has a sight to discover, prior to hearing, the nanus and factual bases ofan other peniss' htigatim positions. Bosni reAased to grant traervention under these circumstances wheresipl6 cant delay could be avoided only at the expense of the discovery Aghts of the esiming panies to thedeusnent of the orderly and ofKcient conduct of any futase be. ring;

'

i

. 'I . , While a brandsung of the Isaws due to the grant af a late-El al petition to intervene might not beof criticalimpostance at the endier stages of a case, the 12 censing Foaad found this consequence to be a *

strong argumas against such intervention whaw it occurs towan! 'aa end of the proceadas, pasticularlywhere no " good cause" exists to justify the delay in seeking imauntion.

LDP 946 VERMONr YANKEE NUC1IAR POWER CORPGAllON (Verracit Yankee Nuclear Pbwer ~Station), Docket No. 547710LA 4 (ASISP Na 8WS-DOLA) (Castructim 1%riod Recapture);OPERATINO IJCENSE AMENDMENT; Janu.iry F,1990; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling onPetition for leave to Intervene Field by tlw Sto of Vermact)

A De IJcensing Board grants the $ute of Vermont's mysest for a hearing for the purpose of oposingthe grant of a license ammdment to estend the Vermet Yankss Nuclear Power Statim operating beense .4

;

to a fuu 40-year term, and adenits one of nine proposed conternions for htigation.

12

<

*

I

L

4F

F , [: 0 y!i , ,

'- ;v :

'

g-

DIGI 3TS,.

ISSUANCl'S OF Tile A10MIC S AITTY AND UCI'NSING lt0ARDS

y{U ,

'

B: In daarmanns whahar a pendmer has sisadas, the Comimssian has bsW that con %~.1pdicial conceps of standing are conuoums hus, thee nest be a showing (1) that the actum tmingchallenged amid cause "anjury-in fact" to the perse seeklag to intervens and (2) that such injury is arguablywithis Ow "zons of intests" pr<nected by the Atomic Emrgy Act er the National Environnental PolicyAct. .

l~ f' ' Abstract concerns" or a *ma, academic intemst" in the matter whkh en nnt accompanied by same''

real impact on a patinoner will act emfer standing. Rather, the asserted harm must have some parnculareffect en a petidener, and a petitimer nmst have scrno direct stake m the outecune of the proceeding.'

D While there is httle guidance in NRC case law concerning the meming of " aspect" as de term isused in 10 CLR. I 2.714, a petinener may sansfy this requirwnst by idatifymg gencial patamat effecta ,

- of the beensing actim or arosa of concern that are within om scope of the public heahh and safety rnauers ]'

that may be considered in the proceeding. |1

E Where a proposed beensing scuan concerns a nuclear facDity wahin a suia, which has posenually

8i signincant effects on Om envinmmers of a mass sad the hashh, welfare, and safety of its citirens, e suishas standmg to intervow in a proceedmg.

F The issue of whether a proposed hcense :-- - - does a does not involve a nigruncent hazania

consideration is not hngable in any hearms that might be held an the proposed ameruhnent becetam the6ndmg is a procedural device whoes only purpose is to determme On timing d the beanng (befces or afterissuance of the emendment).

. Since an en-4 n! report (ER)is rapnrad only for actions 4at wouW aquire an eiwinsanentalO ,

impact maissent (213) under the Comrmasion's regulatians, no ER is requimd in cunneenan whh a proposedconstruction pened secapoare arnandment to estand an initial opereung Econse to a fuD 44 year term because -Om Carnmissian's regulations at 10 C.F.R. 6 51.20(b) does net specify that type of acuan as mqinring an

1i EIS. Only an environmanial assessment (EA) is respiired in conneenan suh sudilicmes amanenents.II A contentim asserting that an awisonmemalimpact statement (EIS) er envisorenanial repnet (ER)

is ro{uired to suppost a proposed licensing action wouW need to claim that the acnon presams potentiallysigmficant envimnmental impseu or unresolved issues of irretnevable cornmurnet of rescuices, and debases wouW need to idennfy thces impsets or insaurces, the Engation of which la not poecrited by the,

iCommisslun's regulanans.' '

i UIP-947 5AITW Ll011T CORPORATION, et al. (Bloomsburg Siis Decantaminatim), Docket Nos. 034,

p ENIDRCEMENT; January 29,1990; ORDER' 89-59401 Oht 90 598 01 OM-2); '

.

05980, 01405981, 03405982, 03408335, 030 03444 (ASLDP Nos.,- , .

. 7

*A he Ucenang Board denies respondent's motian to damiss far lack of prisdiction, cmcludmg that',y the fauure of the orismal hconses to fuuy inform the Camussim of corparats renreanizations and salesf',

'qS of conuothng blocks of stock andered au successor cesporations habis for the come of docuntaminada of'

- sites provinualy under the cetrol of the erisinal Econsec, and subject to the enforcenent authmiy of the ,

Canmissica and the jurisdiction of the Bosal. |

B By asction 184 of the Ai<snic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4 2234 Cagressestablished a stres pubhc policy prohibiting Ow" transfer of control of any heense" by every emonvablemeans, without the prior written and informed conset of the Commisman This brand and sweepng i'sstatutory language was clearly truended to proscribe 4e ahmutian in any manner er form of any heaue orright to utihas or produce special nuclear material, without the specined Catunissim action.y

'C Any pesan or corporation that chocere to engage in heenseJ nuclear byptoduct material activities, !,% '+

is not canpleely fue to conduct itssif in a business es-usual manner, hose are substanual canaraints c[g',1/ ' i ' upon unfeuered business actims and forma sesuhing from the high degros of agulatory evenighas, dueet ;

'+Q or consequential Na surprismaly, such limitations apply to issues involving the duect or induect transferof beenses, signincent changes in cosperais and other heensees, and maners alsied to the liability and -

hp, D De Atornic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, requins e full, fair duelosus to be nude by licensees -

respansibility fac the decantaminanon af sitas and facilities used in heensed acnvines.'t

JG i 'of acnons involving the transfer er conual c' heensees, so that the NRC can make an informed judgmentwhether such actions are in accontance 6a die Act. Clearly, financial and other consuleranans related todecaniaminatiost of the site of heense;inclear byproduct activities couW and shouW be reviewed by omNRC in ful611ing its ststutory respc..sibilities.

e

13

?-1

I

w

w

, .

-

t

n

1

-DIGESTSISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC EAWTY AND LICI'NSING BOAkhs

E-- , Where NRC is denied the opprautity to review Os effect of signifwant changes in a licensee's*s

corponte organizatim due to the licensee's fauure to comply wuh sututary Asclosure requirmanu, the,

transfers of control of a bcouee by corporme resuucturing wese invahd as to the NRC which is obligated

by sutute to duregard them.F ~ De prohibitions against unapproved tansfers of certrol of Econses er. acted by Congress canna .

be ignored or evcaded by hcensees or by the NRC hastf. As.rnpted transfen of ownership and control bya hcenses was bwascow to ahminats NRC junadiction over the sucmbna andties because the transferswere in violation of sututary equirernents.

O Massive transfers sud es 100% of stock ownership and fmdamental change in corporate structiae,

ownenhip, and connut are the same as suempted transfes er assignrnems of heenses.

II ,The strong public puhey enunciated by Congress tri barring unapreoved transfers of curarol ofheensees is conualling, and hence there can be no avoidance of sus mandatory separung sequiarnentsi

by NRC acquiescence, delays,laches or equitable estoppel, omincation of the SEC or the hcensee's ownshamholdeis, abeend proper business mouvations, spinaffs, w the pnmsons of 10 C.T R. Part 50. 4

LDP.948 sal'ETY L10lff CORPORATION, et at (Bloomsburg Sue Decarsaminadon), Docket Nos. 03405950, 03405981, 030-05982, 03408335, 030 03444 (ASLBP Nos. 89 590 01.OM, 94598 01.OM-2); 'ENTORCEh0NT; February 8,1990; ORDER

A De Ucensing Board econsiders and modines ha prior suy pendente lite of the knmahnte s

effectivennas of raw of two Staff enforcemers antess. he Staff order in question required the pardes to i

' begin monthly paymsnts into a fund buended to defmy the cosu of a site earacwrization study, and made. the manies in that fund inune&ately availabic for expendinus. la mo&fying hs paar stay, the UcensmgBoard permiu du requirement of paymers to becrane imme&ately effective but stays any esponditus of

- sue funds pending forder order of the Doan!.B De four.factar test was codined by the Commissian whh negard to toquests far suys of immediately

effecuve decisions in 10 C.F.R. I 2.788. Akhough the regulation does not espletdy apply to decantaminatimenforcement orders, h is logical to apply those wen recognized sundards in considervig the egoitable remedyof a stay of such caden.

C la a decontamination enforcement procesang, the pubbc interest is the met impastars consider.. ation. . Dis factor argues against a suy where the documentary record tends u esubhsh that h is in thepublic interest for prompt action to be taken to require corporaticam and others mapansible for polluting asite with nuclear cornamination to clean up the sue. ,

LDP 949 KERR.McOEE CIIEMICAL CORPORATION (West-Chicago Rars Eanha Facihty) DocietNa 40 206140, (ASLBP Na 83 495-01.ML); MATERIAIA LICENSE AMENDMENT; February 13,

i

1990; thTTIAL DECISION' A' Dis tratial Decision direcu S.aff to issue a hcense -- to Kerr-McGee Chemical Corpo-

niien which will permit it to dupuse et catain thorium mill tailings in an engineemt duposal ceu to becomaructed en hs West Chicago, Illinois she. It foUows WIP.89 35,30 NRC 677 (1989),in which certain

issues were sesolvalin Kere.McOse's favor on r:= ~ for summary disposition, and certain other! hmited issues wese est down for hearing.

B , in this initial Decision, Gw Ucaming Board interprou Crusnan I to 10 C.F.R. Pan 40, Agen&xA, Ends facts following a hearing on those hmited issues, and decides a nvxian for sununary dispasnianof all other issues remaining to be decided. De Uconsing Bosal concludes that Kerr-McGes's grupaseddisposal con satisnes the requirements of 10 C.F.R. Past 40, Appendix A, by wide margins and that thereis a high degree of assuance that no signi6 cant contanunadat will occur as a resuk of the disposal of theWat Oticago mill uibngs in it. ^

C Criterion I sequues that uw goals of remoieness fann population and hydrologic factors must be.!

optmured in choosing smons shcrnative miH tailings &sposal sites.D %e Intnnhactim to Appen&a A provides that consideration must be given to scenamic factors in

choosing anwng ahernatives and permits spphcanu to propose ahernatives to speci5c requiranents. These

provisions dicta's that the Appendia A cnteria must be applied Acaibly wim due consideration of the costsof adieving cenah benents under the criteria.

L

'

14

i> s

i r

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

| '-

,

si

|l

.

DIGESTSIS$UANCF3 OF Tilt ATCMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS

,

.i

E Where the evidence suppats the camelusion that the propcmed dispreal cell will beve only anegligthle impset en gnaindweier quailty, there is no justificane for incurnng the expense of disposing of -the mill taames at snather site when the irnpact on smundwater might be less.

- F Analyses of dispoul cell behavice vnust have an appropriais drgree of conservstient. They should,

permit malistic predicticr,s of the impact of the proposed disposal ceD which, to the extent they on, overnaie i.

that impact llowever, they should nM be so omservative as to be austeadmg. overstating that impact tothe exters of caDing the fossihihty of the proposed eellinto questiart '

IJIP.9410 ROCKWELL NTERNA110NAL CORPORATION (Rocketdyne Dwis'an). Docket h 425 - *

(ASLRP No 89-59441.ML) (Spedal Nuclear MaierialIJoense No. SNM-21) (Request to Renew to Oetnher1990); MA17.RIA14 UCENSE AMENDMENT; March 19,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

A 1he Presidmg Officer in dus proceeding, which is governed by Subpart L of 10 C.F.R. Part 2. ,

;grants in past Applicant's motion to strike certain cawarns and pans of cancerne et theintervenors punuant qno 10 C.F.R. I 2.1233(s). '

B The Presiding OfEcer aviews each of the ecmcerns mentumed in Applicant's motian to arike anddeterrnines, baand an specife facts related to each concern, what por6ma of the motion to strike may be

oppropsistely grantal.

.

To strike o concern or s part of a cacern on the ground d redindancy, the Presiding Officer mustC6nd adundancy within the 61 sng of a particular intervenar. AUeged redundancy with another intervenordoes nat create grounds for a motion to strike. -

D' The presiding officer suggests that the partica resssess their settistnant posities and consider funharnegotiadans tradmg toward settlement

E Applicabihty of quality esaurence (Appendix D to Pan 50) to plutmium processing and fuelfabricatie plants.

WIP 9411 ROCKWEl.L INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Rocketdyne Division), Docket No. 7425(ASLRP Nn 89-594-01.ML)(SpecialNucleat Material Ucense No. SNM-21)(Reques to Raaew to Octdar1990); MATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENTL Maith 30,1994 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

A' . In neponse to Intervences' motion, the posidmg ofacer scadmined the Santa Susana llameownenAssociation as a party along with two of its concerns.

B Relevers newspaper articles, propedy indeasd and sunded far reference isrpasos to an intervenor'sbasic caos, genersuy wGI be sufficient steunds to withstand a motien to sir"se.

C A cancern that population hea grown in the vicimty of a facihty for handling special nuclearmaterials wQ1 not withstand a snotion to strike when it is unaccompanied by suppaned allegations that theresuhing risk of mdiation release win enceed 10 CJ2.R. Part 20 standarJs far alloweble radiation exposures.

D A cancern about additive edects fran toxic asul radicadive maisnala dist is not part d a NEPAcancern, shnu be struck because thste is no regulatory requiremers that such alleged additive effects be

considsted othar than in a HEPA contest.

4

>

!

>

k

- - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ ,, _

.. ... . . ~ . . . . - . - - - . -. . _ . _

. . .*' 2

..

,

e

.

P

.

.%

DIGESTSlu0ANCFS OF DIRECTORS' DICISIONS

~

e

< -:

Di> 941 FLDRIDA POWER AND IJOlff COMPANY (Turkey Piant Nuclear Generstma Plant, Umts 3 and,.

'

<d), Dodet Nas. 54 250,54 251; Rl! QUEST IOR ACI'lON, Manh 22, 1990; DIREC*IUR'S DECISIONUNDER 10 Cf.R. 6 2.206

A in this fmal Duector's Decision, the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulauan aspimd to remsuung .I**

,

lesus left open by Panal Dtmetar's Maion DD B9 5,30 NRC 73 (1989), as well as addiucrut issues --

mised by 'thornas J Saporito in two subsequern 1%dtions The INuumor requested that the NRC take certainkunedsste acuma mth regard in Tuntoy hunt Nuclear Genersung Plant, Units 3 and 4, alleging as bases ,

'

for his esquesta that there had been reprisala against an,ployees for reportmg safety concerns and a chilhng -

erect un reparung safety concerns as a result of decnmmatum and harassmera, that his employment had, been adversely affected after engaging in proincted activity as defmed in 10 CJ R. 6 50.7, that the Licensee

#| and tu canansel acted tmproperly in coruinction mth Ptoumer's hasnns before the Department of labor, *

and that there had been a falsi6 canon and desuuction of documents at the facihty he reasons set fonh hit

| the Putuan, the Director denies the Pisiumer's requesta. :

l B 1he insumuan d . . '- as ic respanas to e requer. pursuant to 10 C.F.R. ( 2.206 is apprapnau

| cnly when substanual heahh and safety issues have been raised.s

3 -

1

|.

m

7 g .,'

ka'

,d

f,*''

,

.. . ,

.

"-

3

,A ..

k#

S.

'I

- 't :.y

5 .

|

h' a

a p.

| 17 - #

l

||

64

1

1

. . . , -. . - . . ,. , ,

d- #3,

.3

#

|

y -

1.,. ,

,

|,

1

.-

2-

|

LMAL CITATIONS INDEX E. . 1

CAS13

I

Abela v. Quatafson,888 F.2d 1258,12t&M (9th C. 1989)applacsbihiy of liqual Access to Justice Act to fusmal proceedmgi in absence of statutory roymrement im

sudi hearings; AI.AP 929,31 NRC 289 (1990)Actmn en Srcoking and floahh v. CAB,724 l',2d 211,225 (D C. Car 1984) #

constructaan of waivers of sovereqps immunity; ALAD-929,31 NRC 291 (1990) ('Addes v. Kress A Ca,398 U.S.144,159 (1970) $ -

afMavit suppen required for aumnary disposinon motiosis; GP-90 4,31 NRC 67 (1990)Alabama Ibwer Ca (Joseph M Fadey Nuclear Plena. Unha i and 2), ALAB-182,7 AIT 210,216-17 (1974) %

criteria fcir admission of consonnons, IJIP 946,31 NRC 92 (1990) 'i

Alabarna Pbwer Co (Joseph M Fedey Nuclear Plant, Uruts I and 2), ALAB 182,7 AEC 210,21' (1974) G --'

procedum for sununary dupostiian; UIP-904,31 NRC 66 r.6 (1990)Alabama Nwer Co (Jonest M IMey Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), C1.18177,14 NRC 795,797 (1981)

"

burden on movsnt f w a suy, AIAH 928,31 NRC 267 (1990)weight given to beparable vuury facia in determining stay mouons CU W3,31 NRC 258 (1990) .

Albed4leneral Nuclear Services (harnwell hel Receiving and Simage Stauun), AIAB 328,3 NRC 420,422 ;t -,

"

w(1976)-

Nintensi requirement oft standing to huevene; LDP-946,31 NRC 89 r.3 (1990) . -(Anderson v. Liberty Idby,Inc.,4W U.S. 342,249 50 (1986)

-'_

,

i burden an opponent of summary dispositinn; CLI-90 3,31 NRC 239 rL28 (199^) p' -

Associatam of Data Processma Service Organizations v Camp,397 U.S 150,153 (1970) .;-

showing necesury to establmh sundmg be inservene in NRC pmreedang; GP 90-6,il NRC 89 (1990)kAvailabihty of Nnds fe Puy nent af Intervenor Attomey Fees - Nuclear Regulatory Comminaion,62 'J,,

Ccene Gen. 692 (1983)'' , '

,

restricuss em award of anorneys' fees, ALAB-929,31 NRC 2M (1900)

,llosion Edison Ca (Pilgran Nuclear inensrating Sianon), DMS.7,27 NRC 601,607 (1988)

.,

J'

| probabahanc nak assesants u mpairernant la heensing; LilP'946,31 NRC 113 (1990)

| Buamens and Professional Peiple for the Pubhc laierest v. NRC,793 F 2d 1366 (D.C. Cir 1986)

i vestricuoes en sward of asorneys' fees ALAB-929,31 NRC 277 (1990)i Camhna Ibwer and Light Ccs (Sheans llanis Nuclear Pbwer Plant). ALAB 837, D NRC 525,533 34 (1986), , ,

| ALAll-843,34 NRC 200,2fM (1986); AIAB-856,34 NRC 802,805 (1986) ,**j consent of arvellate hnefs, ALAB-926,31 NRC 9 (1990)

Camhna INeer and ligM Cu (Sheatun liarris Huclear Ibwer Plant), AIAB-837, Z1 NRC 525,544 (1986)htigabihty of challenges to Comnusaum segulatians; GPM6,31 NRC 103 (1990) , ,

Qiamical Wasie Managenem, Inc. v. EPA,873 l'.2d 1477,1482 (D.C. Car 1989) L *

need far formal haanns en sueerials hasnee suspensum; AIAd-929,31 NRC 285 (1990) - , . "Chevron, U.S A., lac. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,467 U.S. 837 (1984) ,,

esammation of legislalive histmy to determine statusary intent; AIAB429,31 NRC 283 (1990) %

Oncmnati Osa and Lisetric Ca (Wilham II. Zanmer Nuclear Ptmer Staum, Unit 1), AIAB 727,17 NRC 760,,

770, *Di (1983)impanance of accuracy in evacuate tu,se asumates, ClJM3,31 NRC 240 (1990)

Oncmnati Gas and Electne Co (Wilham II. Zimmar Nuclear 5: stim), GP 8414,11 NRC 570 (1980)_

newly acquired orgsmaational esistence sa good cause far late flhng; GPMS,31 NRC 8481 (1990)

> .

? " "

.., e

ye

+.. =

u. . .e. .

.. ..

i 4-1

,

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX'CASESt

Oiy of West Chicago v. NRC,701 F.2d 632, WI (hh Cir.1983), aff's Kerr-McGee 0,rp. (West Chica8o RattEards li cility), CU-82-2,15 NRC 232 0982)s

need far formal hearing on materials beense suspension; ALAB-929,31 NRC 283 0990)Oeveland Dectric 111aminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Nnt, Unita 1 and 2), ALAB443,6 NRC 741,753

(1977)burden an proponers of summary dapasition snation; LBP-944,31 NRC 67 (1990)

Oeveland Destrie illuminating Co (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unha 1 and 2), A1AB-675,15 NRC 1105,,

1113 (1982)request for attorneys' fees as cause fer dacretionary interlocutary review; AIAB-929,31 NRC 279

(1990)Ceveland Doctric luuminating Co. (Peny Nuclear Power Piant, Unita 1 and 2), ALAB-820,22 NRC 743,746

n 8 (1985) -showing, obsent traparsble bijury, for grera of a suy; AIAB-928,31 NRC 2fA 0990)

Oeveland Doctric IDuminating Ca. (Perry Nucl,.ar Power Nnt, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-520,22 NRC 743,148"

n.20 (1985) ...

speculation about accidents as Irvoparable injury for purpose of obtainmg a suyi CU-943,31 NRC.25940 0990)

Oeveland Sectric hminating Co. (Peny Nuclast Power Nat, Unita 1 and 2), CU 86 7,23 NRC 233 0986),aff'd sub nam. Ohio v. NRC, $14 F.2d 258 (6th Cir.1987)

reopening a secard, standards for,ISP-941,31 NRC 21 (1990) 'Oeveland Electric hminatmg Co. (Peny Nuclear Power Pians, Unna 1 and 2), LBit8124,14 NRC 175,

181 85 (1981)eviderniary support regulwd of unaantian at admisslan suge; LBP 946,31 NRC 92 n.10 (1990)

Comnwnweshh Edwan Co. (Braidwaad Nuclear Power Sutim, Units i sad 2), CU-868,23 NRC 241 (1986)wei8ht swan in factoss (ii) and Oy) in determining admissibihty of late 61ed careentions; UIP 901,31

NRC 34 0990)Comneweahh Edison Co. (Ursidwood Nuclear Power Sutian,Uniu i and 2), CU-868 F NRC 241,244

0 986)appucebility of Avo facter test far late h!ings to informal pnxendmsa; LDP 943,31 NRC 51 (1990)

rhh Edison Co. (CarmU County Siu), ALAB401,12 NRC 18,24 0980)escopo of issues htigable in operating hcense amendmnns proceeding; LBP 946,31 NRC 910990)

Cansahasied Edison Co. af New York (Indian Poirs, Unit 2), CU 74-23,7 AEC 947,95152 (1974)issues appropriate for post-hearing resolution by Staff; CL1-943,31 NRC 231 n.11 (1990)

Caswaiidsted Edistm Co. af New York (Indian Puins, Uniu 1,2 ml 3), QJ 75-8,2 NRC 173,176 0975)standa:d far initiation of show-cause pmceedings; DD 901,31 NRC 3310990)

Consumers Power Co. (Medland Piant, Units I and 2), A1AB-123,6 AEC 331,345 0973)bunion of poof and burden el going forward in licensing proceedings; AIAB-926,31 NRC 15 0990)

Consumera Rmer Co. (Wiland Nat, Unita 1 and 2), AIAB-458,7 NRC 155,159-60,169 70 (1978)licanes autharisation while romand pinceedings and snatism are pending QJ 943,31 NRC 230 0990)

Consumars Power Co. (Elland Piant, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-634,13 NRC 96,98 (1981)ebligation of appeal boards to accept refened ruhnss; AIAD-929,31 NRC US (19)0)

Consumers Power Co. (Midland Nnt, Units I sad 2), CU-73 38,6 AEC 1082,1083 84 0973); CU 74-3,7AEC 7,9-10 A n.6 0974) '

hearing rights an materials twense suspensions; AIAB429,31 NRC 288 0990)Consumers Pbwer Cn. (Mulland Nns, Uniu I and 2),IEP 82-63,16 NRC 571. 5710982)

newly arisms information as good causs far laie intervention: LEP 945,31 NRC 79 (1990)Duke Power Ca gAmendment e Materials Ucense SNM 1773 -Transpansiian of Spent het from Ocones

. Nuclear Sution for Siarage at McGuire Nuclear Statian), AIAB-528,9 NRC 146,1510979)menu determinates at cmiention admissian stage;IEP 946,31 NRC 92 0990)

Duke Power Ca (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units I and 2), AIAB 687,16 NRC 460 0982), rev'd in part onother grounds,CU-83-19,17 NRC INI 0983)

standard far accepance of refened rulings; AIAB 929,31 NRC 279 0990)

'2e

1

-.,

,

6

gy o

,

,i

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX'

;CASl3' '

Duka Poest Ca (Catawbs Nuclear $tatim, Unhs I and 2), CIL8319, !? NRC INI (1983) ,

>6ve facts test for admisdon of laweled senimies spplied to enotions to seapou LaF 901,31 NRC 21

0 990) ,

..

Escobar Ruis v. INS,838 F.2d 1020 (9th Ctr.1988) ,

;ff apphcability of Equal Aness to Jurdce Act to formal proonediny in absence of statutory requirement for ,

'

such hearings; AIAB 929,31 NHC 289 (1990) (

Lamm Nucirer Ca (Nuclear ebel Recovery and Recycims Center),IRP-77 59,6 NRC 518 0971)'

;j pronunhy to facihty as h sis far standing;12P-90 3,31 NRC 42 (1990)l'irst National Bank of Arisma v. Citics Service Ca,391 U.S. 253,289-90, reh's denied,393 U.S. 901 (1968)' ' '

4

showing necessary far gre 8 of summary disposition;ISP-9M,31 NRC 67 (1990)Morida Power and LJght Ca (Si Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Na 2), AIAB-4M,5 NRC 1185,1888

,

(1977) . .'t '

decisionmaking process in mnsideraticn of shernative site; ALAB 928,31 NRC 268 (1990)Gallagher & Ascher Ca v. Sus e,687 P.2d 1067,1074 Oth Cir.1982) ,

''

tneed fu formal hearing rs materials hcense suspenakn; AIAB-929,31 NRC 286 (1990)Gamn v. liedler,146 F.2d 84. ,852 (D.C. Ctr.1984) ,t

standard for grant of writ i aundamus; C1J-90-3,31 NRC 229 0990).

General Public Udlities Nucles, Corp. (1hree Mile Island Nuclear Statim, Urdt )), AIAB 881,26 NRC 465,

473 0 987) .

?!fstandard for rejection or ankfu:adon of beansing board findmas; AIAB-926,31 NRC 13 (1990)

General Public Udhties Nuclear Corp. (three Mae taland Nuclear Station, Unit 2), ALAB-914,29 NRC 357,

361 (1989). .

.

t

shnwing, absent imparabis injury, for grant of a suy; AIAB 928,31 NRC 269 (1990)Osorgia Power Ca (Vogtle Dactric Generating Plant Units I sad 2), AIAB 872,26 NRC 127,131-32 0987)

paialty for failure to bnef claims on appcal; AIAB 926,31 NRC 9 (1990)Outf States Udhues Ca (River Bed Station, Uniu I and 2), AIAB-444,6 NRC 760,796 (1971)

seliance on maher party in represent ma's inuussis as good cause for late intervenuan; 13P-945,31NRC 80 0990)

llaire v. United States, 869 F.2d 531,534-36 (9th Cir.1989)applicabihty of F+al Access to Justice Act to formal pmceedmas in absmco of stanmory m|uirement for ,

aue hearings; ALAB 929,31 NRC 289 (1990) (,

llousion IJahung and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Generedng Sestian, Unit 1), AIAB-590,11 NRC 542, ;

$48 0980)nierits daterminatinna at consention adenissian stage;IEPM6,31 NRC 92 (1990) .

i

llouston IJahting and Ibwer Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1), ALAB-590,11 NRC 542,

550 0 980)rurpose of summary dispnsitim; LBP-904,31 NRC 67 0990)

lioustan IJahting and Power Ca (South Texas Project Units I and 2), ALAB-549,9 NRC 644,64849 0979). weight afven to delay and broodaning af issues in desernuning late irnervenden petitions; 1 RPM 5,31

NRC 82 0990)liouston lighung and Power Ca (South Teams Project, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-799,22 NRC 160,37475 (1985)

litigabuity of character of licensee for phaanium penceasing and fuel fabrication plant; ISPM10,31

NRC 297 (1990) .

1 - linuston IJahting and ibwer Ca (Sauth Tamas Project, Units 1 and 2),IEP 5413.19 NRC 659,669-79 (1984). htigability of chancter of beenses for plutonium processing and fuel fabrication plant;ISP-9410,31

NRC 297 (1990) .

- Independent Bankers Association v. Board of Govemos,516 F.2d 1206,121314 (D.C. Or.1975)examination of legislative history to deternuns statutory intent; AIAB-929,31 NRC 283 0990)

Kansas Oes and Electric Ca (Wolf Cnek Generating Stadon, Unit I),12PW 17,19 NRC 878,856 0984)previously avaanble information that is newly acquired by intervenor as gnod cause for late fihng;

,

LBP 90 5,3i NRC 79 0990),

Kanssa Oes and Electric Ca (Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1), LDP 84 26,20 NRC 53,6162 (1984)'

. inaues appropriate for post hearing resohaion by Staff; CLIM3,31 NRC 231 all 0990)

|

|l

21

11

.. !

1

_ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ht .,;,

-,

-f

,

. LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX*

-CASFS -

Kanssa 04: and Doctric Ca v. Brodt,780 F.2d 1505 (lK Or.1985), cat. denied,478 U.S.1011 (1986)prosection ofintervenor-employes inun retalianon by licem 12P 903,31 NRC 78 0990)

lewis v. Unbed Sutes,445 U.S. 55,60 (1980)t

staning point for statutory interpretanon; ALAB-929,31 NRC 282 C000) f

Umerick Imlogy Acdon v. NRC,869 F.2d 719 (3d Cir.1989)adrnissibDity of environmersal contendan dealing with mester-than dmign-banis accidents; UIPM6,31

NRC 1110990) -|Img taland Lighting Ca (Shareham Nuclear Power Sation, Unit 1), AIAB 743,18 NRC 387,396 n.37 0983)

fear of hcensee utahation as good cause far late-fded trurvenne petit,an, LBPMS,31 NRC 77 (1990)Img taland Ughting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Powa Sistion, Unit 1), AIAB 788,20 NRC 1102,1159 (1984)7 <

lasues oppoprute for post hearing resolution by Staff; c.JM3,31 NRC 231 n.ll 0990)Img Island Ughting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Sution, Unh 1), ALAB-832,23 NRC 135,154-57 (1986),

,*

|!- aff'd, CU-8712,26 NRC 383,398 99 (1987)E. relevance of probahihty of implemenida of a prtsective action to desernunation of whether anergency

plannmg chtigations have twm met; CD M3,31 NRC 246 (1990)Img taland Ughting Ca (Shareham Nuclear 1%r Sude, Utut 't), ALAB-902,28 NRC 421,429, review

declined, CU 8811,28 NRC 603 (1988)licensing bnant authcaity to dismiss pania in bifurcated proceedings; ALAB-927,31 NRC 140 (1990)

Img laland Ughting Ca IShoreham Nuclear Powa Sudan Unh 1), ALAB 903,28 NRC 499,506 0988)fundarnnual Raw standard for judging adequacy of emergency plans;ISPMl,31 NRC 33 n54 (1990)

Img Island Usking Ca (Sheeham Nuclear Fower Stanon Unit 1), ALAB 911,29 NPC 247,254-55 (1989)FAS network as means of natifying public of radiological emergency, rehance an; LBPM1,31 NRC 27

0 990)Img taland Lighting Ca (Shareham Nuclear Powa Sunan, Unit 1), CUhlI,23 NRC 577,581 (1986)

fundamental flaw standard for admission of emergency ensreise cmtendans; CUM 3,31 NRC 228

0 990)Img kland Ughting Ca (Sharsham Nucher Powe Station, Unh 1), CUhl3. 24 NRC 22 0986) ;

standard far daarmanns adequecy of emergancy planning: CUM 2,31 NRC 202,217 0990))Img taland Ughting Ca (Shanham Nuclear Power Sudon, Unit 1), CUhl3,24 NRC 22,30 (1986) '

minimum dose savings or svecuation time fa EPZ, need to prosat, (11M3,31 NRC 240 (1990)Img Island ughting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Statim, Unit I), CLI&l3,24 NRC 22,31 (1986) 1

' bat-effms assumptien applied to staw panicipatiai la armrgmey response whose suis has not- .

participatad in amaramey planning; taPM t. 31 NkC 42 (1990)Img taland Ushting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Statios, Unit 1), CUM 2,29 NRC 2110989)

,.',

EDS neswak as means of nodfying public of radiotopical ernernmey, aliance on;ISPMI,31 NRC 27.,

0 990) . . 5

las laland Ushting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power SMon, Unit 1), LBP 83 57,'ll NRC 445,573 74 (1983)probabilistic risk assessment requiranant far hee., sing;ISP 946,31 NRC 113 0990) i

Img taland Ughting Ca (Shercham Nuclear Power Station, Umt 1), IRP-54 53,20 NRC 1531 (1984)licanas authariration while romand pmces'ings and motions are pending; CUM 3,31 NRC 230 (1990)

Img taland Ughting Ca (Shareham Nuclear Powa Station Unh 1),ISP 87 26,26 NRC 201,204,recanaidersnan denied,IEP 87 29,26 NRC 302 (1987) I

- suplies to responses to senmary dispositim monona; LBPM4,31 NRC 63 n.3 (1990)Img taland Ushting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1),120 8448,28 NRC 311 (1988)

failum ofintervenor to addiens roerks of decisiai on EBS network as sneans of notifying pubbe ofradialogical emergency; IEP yo.1,31 NRC 27 n34 (1990)

Imisiana Power and Ucht Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Stanm, Unit 3), CURI,23 NRC 1 (1986)soopening a seconi, standards for;IEP 901,31 NRC 210990) *

Marathon Oil Co. v. EPA,544 F.2d 1253,1263 (9th Or.19W) .

need for formal hearing en materials license suspm AIAB-929,31 NRC 283 (1990)Massachunsus v. United States,856 P.2d 378 0988)

best-effarts assumption applied to state pardcipation in smargeicy response where stais has notparticipated in emergency plarams; LDPM1,31 NRC 42 (1990)

l

22 _

>

k

';

l',

.. ;

h

t:

i1':

k\; i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX .- CASFS ~

Mathews v. Ddridge,424 U.S. 319,333-35 0976)formal hearings mandated by due process omsiderannns; AIAB-929,31 h7C 291 n.14 (1990)

Metropohtan Eduan Co. Ghree Mile laiand Nuclear Station, Unit 1), CLI-8417,20 NRC 801,804 (1984).

burden on movant for a stay; ALAB-928,31 NRC 267 (1990) -

,.~ Wsissippi Ptmer and IJg4 Ca (Orand Outf Nuclear Stanan,lu 1), ALAB-704,16 NRC 1725,1730 (1982)

particularity seguised of motions to seapen; 1BP 901,31 NRC 35 0990)Weissippi Power and IJght Ca (Orind Outf Nuclear Stance, Units I and 2), AIAB 130,6 AEC 423,426

0 973)detaa required for basis at easantian adnnssian stage;1SP 946,31 NRC 92 0990)

Weissipp Power and IJght Ca (Orend Oulf Nuclear Station, Uniu 1 and 2), ALAB 741,'16 NRC 1725,1730

(1982) ..taudan en intervenuon pennaner in absence of Sood cause for late hg; IEP-945,31 NRC 76 (1990)

New Yak v. NRC,350 F.2d 745,75657 (2d Cir.1977)'speculadon shout accideras as irreparable injury for purpose of otmaining a stay; C1J-943,31 NRC

259 60 (1990)Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (Nina Mile I%s Nuclear Staden, Unit 2), AIAB 264,1 NRC S47,357 0975)

standasd for rejection er ernlification of licensing board Andings; AIAB-926,31 NRC 13 (1990)Nanhern Indiana Public Service Ca (thilly Oseerating Sta.im, Nuclest 1), AIAB-303,2 NRC 858,861

(1975)weight givut by appeal boards to hcensing board Ender; AIAB-926,31 NRC 13 0990)

Northam Indiana 1%1ic Servia Co- (Bailly Genereung Sunan, Nucleai't), ClJ 78 7,7 NRC 429,43132

0 978)applicability of APA seaion $54 to mate ials license suspension proceedings: AIAB-929,31 NRC 288

(1990) 'Owens v. Brad 860 F,2d IM),1366 (6th Cir.1988)

constmenon of wolvers of emercian innunhy; AIAB 929,31 NRC 290 0990)Oystershall Alhance v. NRC,800 F.2d 1201 (D.C. Cir.1986)

License aushariation while remand precomi ny and innnans are routing; CLI 943,31 NRC 230 (1990)Pacinc Oss and Decarte Ca (Diablo Canyan Nuclear Power Plant, Umu I and 2), CLI 4612,24 NRC 1,6

n.3 0986), rev'd in part on other grounds San Luis Obispo Mothers far Peace v. h1C,799 F.2d 1268 (9thCir.1986) .

'.

purpose of no signincent hazards consklaration determination; 12790 6,31 NRC 91 (1990)Pennsylvania Power and IJaht Ca (Susquehanna Steam Dearie Suiinn, Uniu I and 2), AIAB 148,6 AEC

M2, M3 n.2 (1973)sufEciency of publication in Fedaal Register to pt intervenurs on nonce abat proposed actian;- ISP 90-5,31 NRC 79 (1990)

! .sylvania Power and IJaht Co. (Susquehanna Steen Deasie Staden, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAlb693,16 NRCd52,955 57 0982)

canias of siveDats triefs; A1AB-926,31 NRC 9 0990)Philadelphia Doctric Ca (13menck Generating Stanon, Units I armt 2), AIAB-819,22 NRC 681,705 06

(1985), alf'd in part and soview otherwise declined, C1J-86 5,23 NRC 125 (1986), romanded in pan enother grounds sub nera. Limerick Ecology Action,Inc, v. NRC,869 F.2d 719 Od Cir.1989)

documanu forming compless ..~ ~' record of decision; AIAB-926,31 NRC 17 n.78 0990)Philadelphie Doctric Ca (lmnerid Generanns Sunon, Uniu I and 2), A1AB.836,23 NRC 470,494-95

(1986)acceptability of predictive 6ndings and post hearing verincatian of formulation and iruplemenution of

ornergency plans; CU 90 3,31 NRC 2310990) -Fhnadelphia F.n ctric Ca 0%4ch Bonom Ausnic Power Station, Unita 2 and 3). AIAB-216, i AEC 13,20-21e

0 974)acope of issues htigable in operating license amendment precmeding; IBP 90 6,31 NRC M (t 990)

Ihiladelphia Newspapers,Inc. v. NRC,727 F.2d 1195,1202 (D.C. Cir.1984)statute that determines *hether an on-the secord hearing is nxtuired; AIAB 929,31 NRC 282,2 3 (1990)

13

i

l

,,

i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX3

CASl3.

Porter County Chsper of the lamak Walum Imague of Amence, Inc. v. NRC,606 F.2d 1363,1368 n.12(D.C Cir.1979)), cert. dmied,469 U.S. I132 (1985)

need fu farmal hearms en maurists beense suspension. AIAB-929,31 NRC 284 0990)Purtland General Doctric Ca (Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), CL1-76 27,4 NRC 610,613-14

~ (1976)emceps of atnadmg opphed to NRC proceedmg; ISP-90 6,31 NRC 89 0990) *

Portland Generst Electric Co. (Trojan Nuclear Plant), AIAB-534,9 NRC 287,289-90 n6 (1979)scege d lasues litigaWe in opsnting hoanas a.. paceeding; LDP-946,31 NRC 91 (1990)

PuWie Service Co. af Indans (Marble lhu Nuclear Generating Sution, Unlu 1 and 2), AIAB-316,3 NRC 167,t

170 0976)-scups of issues htigable in operanns licmse ammenent proceedmg; LEP 946,31 NRC 910990)

Public Service Ca d ladiana (MarWe !!al Nuclear Generanns Sution, Unita 1 and 2), AIAB405,5 NRCI190,1192 0 977)

standard for discretimary interhmnory review; AIAB-929,31 NRC 278 (1990)1 Pub Service Ca of Indiana (MarWe Iliu Nuclear Generating Sution, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-437,6 NRC 630,

. 634 0 977)>

weight given to irreparable injury clairn where alternative site cantamion is being parsued; AIAB 928,31;

NRC 268 0990)Puh Serece Co. d Indiana (Marbis llal Nuclear censraung Stanon Unita 1 and 2), AIAB41,7 NRC 313,

318 0 978)'

issues appropnate for post-heaang resolunan by Staff, CLI 943,31 NRC 231 all (1990). Puh service Co. af New llampshire (Seabrod Statian, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-843,27 NRC 43,49 0958)

Ave factor test fw sdmission of 14:441a4 conunties appbed to motions to regen; LBP-901,31 h1C 21

(1990)Public Service Co. of New llamphire (Seabrook Sudan, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-915,29 NRC 427,432 0989)

reopening a secord, standa ds for, ISP 941,31 NRC 21 (1990)Puh Senice ca of New Itamphire (Scabroa Sution, thits I and 2), AIAB-918,29 NRC 473,483-84

(1989)pementarlay sequired d avmions to reopen; 12P-901,31 NRC 35 0990) -

PuWie Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Sution, Units I and 2), CLI 77 8,5 NRC 503,516 (1977)'

,;

Carnmission authority to inurvens and provide guidance in pawLng m ' as; CL1943,31 NRC 229 --

-|0990) -

PuWie Service Co, of New Itampshin (Seabrook Station, Uniu 1 and 2), ClJ 77 8,5 NRC 503,5210977). licanas emhalaation while tornand proceedings and motions are pendag; ClJ-943,31 NRC 230 (1990)

Puh Service Ca of New Hamphire (Seabrook Stana, Uniu I and 2), ClJ 7bt,5 NRC 503,532 0977)bass fa cost benent analysis on mnand; AIAB 928, St NRC 268 (1990)

Puh 3ervice Co. ef New llampshire (Seabronk Sianan, Uniu I and 2),12P 82 76,16 NRC 1029,1033 ;

(1982) ' . . .

pmhaintistic risk assensment rapuramera far ti.:ensing;IEP-946,31 NRC 113 0990)Puw Service Ca of New Itamphire (Seabrook Sutim,Unlis I and 2),IJIP 83 32A,17 NRC 1170,1874 r 4

0983)-Inialen en proponent of summary disposinon anotion; LDP 944,31 NRC 69 0990)

PuWie Service Ca of New llamrehire (Seabrook Statim, Units 1 and 2), IEP 89 3,29 NRC 51,59, aff'd,AIAB-915,29 NRC 427 (1989)

. . '

- weight given to facion (iii) and (v) in determining admissibihty of latc41ed contendons; IEP-901,31NRC 34 f1990)

PuWie Service Doctric and Oas Ca (Salern Nuclear Generating Statim, Unit 1) ALAD-588,11 NRC 533,536 |

' (1980) 3

isundard for diacretionary intertacutmy review; AIAB-929,31 h1C 278 a.2 0990)

PuW Sevice Doctric and Osa Ca (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Umt 1), AIAD-650,14 NRC 43,50n.10981), aff'd sub nom. Township of lower Alloways Creek v. Public Service Electric and Osa Ca,687

'. F.2d 732 (3d Cir 1982) : . .

: Eling standards applicable in pro se huervenors; AIAB 926,31 NRC 10 0990)

24

.

t

Y

.s;

1

y< >

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEXCASFS

(.

z Quivira Mains Co. v. NRC,866 F.2d 1346,1252 (10th Or,1989)east-bmant balancing requhemenu far espasal of mlD tauings;IBPM9,31 NRC 159 0990)

F Raliroad Coneniasian of Tsaas v. United States,765 F.2d 221,227 28 (D.C. Qr.1985)

j ' spplicabihty of APA section 554 to materials license suspesian procee&ngs; AIAB.929,31 NRC 287'

0 990) i,

Reher v. Sanatane Corp.,442 U.S. 330,337 (1979)surung paint is mututmy interpretatian; AIAB-929,31 NRC 282 (1990)

,

Rockmu Intemational Cap. (Rodetdyne Dwisia.), AIAB 925,30 NRC 709,712 n.10989)secepunce d afened rulings with generic trnpheatims; ALAD429,31 NRC 279 (1990) ,

Rockn11 International Corp. (Rocketdyne Dwision), AIAB-925,30 NRC 709 (1989)raponsitality of presidag officer to documas discuss ens in esadanom egnanerss; 1 BPM 10,31 NRC

317 0 990).

San 1.uis Otasps bkshers for Peace v. NRC,151 F.2d 1287,1316 (D.C Gr.1984), aff'd,789 F.2d 26 (en'

.

banc), can. dmied,479 U.S. 923 (1936) '

need for fanr.al hosring en mamrials license suspensian; AIAD-929,31 NRC 285 (1990)seacoast Anti-Pulluuan langue v. Conde,572 F.2d 872,876 'Ist Cir.1978), cert denied,439 U.S. 824 0978)

'- need far formal hearms m materials beense suspensmn; AIAB-929,31 NRC 283 0990).

. Seacoast Anti-PoDution lasgue v. NRC,690 F.2d 1025 (D.C Or.1985)economic censiderations in decisionrnaking an compliance with emergency planning safety n:gulathms; ,

QJM3,31 NRC 259 0990)Siars Qub v. Mwton,405 U.S. 7U (1972)

,

showmg necesury to establish standag to intervene in NRC procomhng; LllP-%6,31 NRC 89 0990)Smedberg Machine & ToolInc. v. Donovan,730 F.2d 1089 06 Cir.1984)

construction o waivers of soverman immumty; AIAB-929,31 NRC 290 0990)rSouth Carolma Electric and oss Ca (Virgil C. Summa Nuc1 car Stasim, Uma 1), ALAD-642,13 NRC 881,895

(1981)weight given to delay and broadening of issues in determining late intervenuan petitions; LDPM1,3)

NRC 34 (1990); LDP-90-5,31 NRC 83 0990) y

Southern Califania E& san Co. (San Onofa Nmlear Osnarating Sution, Unia 2 and 3), CLI.83-10,17 NRC ,

$28,533 0983)stan,lant for determi-ins adequacy rf emergency planrung: CLJML 31 NRC 201 (1990)

Southern California Eason Co. (San Onofa Nur|. ear Generating Statiarf, Units 2 and 3), CLJ.8310,17 NRC528,536 0983), av'd in past on other gruunds, OUARD v. NRC,753 F.2d 1144 (D.C. Qr.1985) ;

interpsetatie of ''estreanimary measurw"in errargency planning; CLJM3,31 NRC 237 n.21 (1990)SL Imis Fuel and Supply Co. v. ITRC,890 F.2d 446 (D.C. Or.1989)

construction of waivu of sovereign inununity; AIAB 929,31 NRC 290 (1990)Statement of Policy a Conduct of IJcensing Proceedings, CLJ-818,13 NRC 452,457 (1981)

purpose of sununary dupasition;IJIP.90-4,31 NRC 67 0990)Tennessee Valley Autharity (Browns Fe ry Nuclear Plant, Uniu I and 2), AIAB-341,4 NRC 95 0976)

suf6ciency of publication in Federal Register to put inservenars on notics about pgased action;laPMS,31 NRC 79 0990)

In Rs 'Duunburgh,869 F.2d 1503,1508 (D.C. dr.1989)sundard for grant of writ of mandamus; CUM 3,31 NRC 229 (1990)

Transnuclear Inc. (fen Applicatims for Low Ennchet Uranium Exports to EURAYOM Meneer Nations), ;

CU.77 34,6 NRC 525,531 (1977) .'

abstract concerns or acaJamic iruenst as bases far standing to knervono; IBPM6,31 NRC 89 n.3

(1990) ..

Urtian of Concemed Scientisu v. NRC,735 F.2d 1437,1444 n.12 (D.C. Cir.1984)need for formal beenng on matenals hconse suspension; ALAB-929,31 NRC 284 0990)

Unim of Concerned Scienusu v. NRC,824 F.2d 108 (D.C. Cir.1987) i

distinction betwom first-tier and second-tier standards for emergency planning; ClJM2,31 hE 203

0 990)

| 25

|

L||

|

|

|| |

|-'

i1

1

L|

L

't %+ <1 ;

,; . -' fy

-+

m,.. s' i

c + 3' 4 |,

opr

'i

s

n LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX-'

CASf3

l ;>4 -.

!Q ' . Untied Swee v. Allegheny imdlum Steel Corp.,406 U.S.742,75657 0972)

. stanes that determines whether an on-the scord hearing is required; AIAB429, St NRC 282,283 (1990) ;

thised Sutes v. Florida East Coast Ry.,410 U.S 224,238 0973)need for formal hearing cm matedals license suspension; AIAB-929,31 NRC 283 (1990)

Unhed suies Energy Research and Developnent Adminisustian (Clinch River Breeder Resciar Plant),f

. CU-7613,4 NRC 67,75 76 0976) ',

scge of Commissian authority to imervene and provide guidance in pending pnwedmg., CU-90-3,31,' 1 NRC 229 0990)

Veraxes %nkee Nuclear Power Corp v. Natural Resources Defense Council,Inc.,435 U.S. 519,553-54

0978) ~cl.tims of heensing board errar where claimant's own witnesses endorsed the licensing board fmdmas;<

ALAB-926,31 NRC 15 0990)Virginia Doctric and Power Ca (Nonh Anna Power Station, Units I and 2), AIAB 146,6 AEC 631,633

p. 0 973) ''

'P truerpretation of * aspect" es used in section 2714, LBP-90 6,31 NRC 89 0990).

Virginia Bactric and Powa Co. (North Anna Pbwer Sution, Uniu I and 2), ALAB 289,2 NRC 395,398' ,

0 975) -burden on intervmors where good cause is nat shown for late. Aled contentums; IEP-941,31 NRC 34

. .

(1990)Virginia ISctric and Power Co. (Nonh Anna Power Sution, Units I and 2), ALAB 522,9 NRC 54,57 (1979)

prualmity to facility as basis for standing;IEP 943,31 NRC 45 0990)#

.

Yttsinia tilectric and Power Co. (North Anna Ibwer Station Uniu I and 2), A!AB-584,11 NRC 451,453'

(1980)showing necessary for grara of summary dupasition; ISP 904,31 NRC 67 0990)

Virginia Petroleum Jabbers Asa'n v. Federal Power Camnussion,259 F.2d 921,925 (D.C. Ctr.1958)enteria for stay of immediais effectiveness of ordr.rs; LBP 90 8. 31 NRC 146 (1990)

- starmlani far grant of a suy pendmg appeal; CU-943,31 NRC 257 (1990),

. Virginia Sunshine Alliance v, llendele,477 P Supp. 68,10 (D.D.C.1979) .speculation about accidmis as irreparable kjury for purpaso of obtaining a stay; ClJ 943,31 NRC - .

259-60 0 990)Wanh v. Soldin,422 U.S. 490 0975) .,

sshowing necessary to establish sunding to intervene in NRC protesdmg; LBP 946,31 NRC 89 (1990)Washingten Public lbwer Suwly Systern (WPPSS Nuclear Project Na 2), DD 84 7,19 NRC 899,923 (1984)

standant for initiation of show cause proceedings; DD-901,31 NRC 331 (1990)Washington Public Ibwer Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project Na 3), AIAB 747,18 NRC 1167,1175 76

0 983)use of show-cause proceedings to address issues that are the subject of an cmaning pmceeding; LBP 90 5,

31 NRC 80,810990)Westinghouse Doctric Corp, (Expans to the Philippines), CU-8414,1I NRC 631,662 0980)

- burden on movant far a stay; ALAD 928,31 NRC 267 (1990)Wiscanain Doctric Ibwer Co. (ibint Beach Nuclear Plant, Uniu I and 2), AIAB 739,18 NRC 335,338 n.4

- (1983)penshy far fauure to brief claims on appeal; AIAB 926,31 NRC 9 0990)

>

Wisconsin Pubbe $srvice Corp. (Kewames Nuclear Ibwer Plam), LBP 78-34,8 NRC 78,83 0978) ' .

bunien on iraerventen petitioner in absence of good cause for late Eling; LBP-945,31 NRC 76 (1990)Wang Yang Song v. McGrath,339 U.S. 33,50 (1950)

farmal haanngs mandated by due process considerations; AIAB 929,31 NRC 291 n.14 0990)Wrenster Laboratories,IEP 8909,30 NRC 746,761 n.18 (1989)

entitlemas of heenses to acaver fees under the F+al Access to Justice Act; AIAB429,31 NRC 279

n.3 0990)

|26

..

f.

|

|

| \,

d

.|

- .

.,, . . . . - - _ ____. __ _ _

. ,|-

1

i

- 1

l:. - .,

hi

I

.. . |i i

-3

-,

: . |e'

' , s

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX D - |

REGULATIONS , a *"

|,

. . : |<

! |-wi

1 CJ R. 0.103(b)"

.., j

sppbcabihty of Equal Access to Justace Act to formal NRC proceeangs in absence of statutory - ' . ,.'

mjuimnent for such heannss: ALAH-929,3i NRC 289 (1990),

I

1 Cf.R. 315 .~ ; ,. |

spphenbihty of Equal Access to Justice Act to formal NRC proceedmas in absence of statutorympurement for such heannss; ALAD-929,31 NRC 288 (1990) . |

i Cf.R 315.103 ,

apphcability of Fqial Access to Justice Act to formal NRC proceedings in absence of statutory N 1

sequimnant for sua heannsa; AIAll-929,31 NRC 289 (1990) ,e

a0 C.F.R. 2.202., - e

opportunity for formal heanns on materials hcess suspenamns; AIAB 929,31 NRC 287 (1990) . -

10 CF.R. 2.206 efwum for istagating concerns about grior decomnuasmrung actavitaea; LDP-943, 31 NRC 48 (1090) /j, ' % ' ,request for actim concerning employee repnaals for sporting safety concerne; DD941, 31 NRC 328 M "

(1990) ,h* 4

standard for initaation of show.cause proceedings; .3941, M NRC 331 (1990) . .k-

use of showcause proceedings to address issues , hat are the su, sect of an ongomg procee&ng. . , 4 m

LEP 90-5, 31 NRC 80, 31 (1990) ..

10 CF.R. 2.700 g .pd

opportumty for formal heanns on maienals hce. es suspensions; AIAB-929, 31 NRC 287 (1990) q .

10 C F.R. 2.704(c)'

'Q,,

enfor 1 ment proceedmg defined as adversary adWeation; AIAll-929,31 NRC 281 (1990)W-Mdaqualificatie of special assiams in informal proceeng; LDP-943,31 NRC 52 (1990) ..

10 C.F.R.1714 . ,.

interest requirernents for mtervention in operstmg heerse smendmment peceedmg; IEP-90 6, 31 NRC -

,

88 (1990)10 CF.R. 2.714(aXI) | s

ednusaibihty of late-ftled conursanns based on previously unavailable heensing documents; ISP-946, 31'~ ,

NRC 98,100 (1990),

i

apphcabihty of fne-factor test for late flungs to informal proceedings IEP-943,31 NRC 51 (1990).

consideration of hypothetical cases m determming whether good cause ensta for late intervenuonIEP-945,31 NRC 77 (1990)

five-factor test for late iruervenuan; LEP-945, 31 NRC 76 (1990); 10 CF.R.1714(a)(1)(ii-(v)| rerpating a record, standards for, IEP 901, ?! NRC 21, 34, 36 (1990) 4

10 CF.R.1714(aX2)particulanty required of intervennon petHms; IEP.946, 31 NRC 88, 89 (1990)

10 CF.R. 2.714(b)*basie with4pecificity requimnent for admission of coruentions; LDP.90 6,31 NRC 91 (1990) i'

,

10 CF.R. 2.714(d)1

| critaria for grant of interventmn; IEP-946, 31 NRC 88 (1990)

i

|'

;

(-

..

I J

| 27 '. <

n,

|

.

.

.

,s.

1

1

1t

_ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

'

g ,G tr'.

' ' '' '

gs

:y s ,.

p.my "^ ;+,

1. :a .w ;> . ,

v. ,

?;. . .

. LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX -Z e ,

. . .'

.. RFGUIATIONS - '

jh <i3 ,

''..

3'10 CFA 171t(i) . .. '!

.

'

.,. standasd for discretaanary innerlocutory review; A1AB-92r,31 NRC 278 n.2 (1990) !

W..10 CFA'2.730(f) .

4

' liunsing boemt authwity to sfer rulangs to the Commission for soview; ALAB-929,31 NRC 275*,

0 990) '. ..

.

.

,

standsel for licensing boant referral of ruling fcr knedocutory apps!!aie revier, AIAB4?9,31 h1C 5a

r , .. 278 0 990)e

10 CFA 1732 - #

huden of poof and burden of going forward in licensing pioceedings; AIAB-926,31 NRC '15 0990)C'

,

19 CFA 1734 .

. , .. *

seapenm3 s necess, standards for; IEP 90-1,31 NRC 21, 36 (1990) L.

,

10 CFA 1734(a)safety signl6caece daearmmation in decision to admit late 41ed contentim; IEP 901,31 NRC 26 (1990)

*

,y..10 CFA 1734(aXI) * '

discretaan of pending ofScar to adndt safety-signi6 cant lat*Elad cornentaans; IEP 90-1,31 NRC 26a.25 0990)

; good coues aquinsnent for lat*6ted corsentions spplied to motims to seopen; IEP 941,31 NRC 34i i (1990) ' *

etandant for grant of late 41ed snation to suopen; AIAB-927,31 NRC 139 (1990) '

innenness ,' r for motions to reopen; 12P 90-1,31 NRC 210990), ..

10 CFR,1734(aX3)-

iG materially differms result requirement for justifying motion to veopen; 1RP 901,31 NRC 33 (1990)f ' r, '' 10 CFA 1749 .

.W ' purpme of summary disposition; IEP 944,31 NRC 66 (1990); IEP-946,31 NRC 92 (1990)L replies to responses to sunwnary disposition mraions; 13P 944,31 f ' 63 n.3 0990)'sunmary disposition of contentions challenging changes in tedmical fications; 13P-944,31 NRC.3;

f 36 0990) i.H ' 10 CFA 1749(b) . _ .,

. af6 davit suppert requhed for summary disposition motions; 13P 904,31 NRC 69 0990) 'i

.

compassney of huervener's expert apposing sunenary disposition motion: 12P-904, Si NRC 65 0990)''

,:y of licenses expert supporting licenses's summary dispaanaan anotion; IEP-944,31 NRC 63

(1990) . . . ..

<- |'

>

.- showing escasesry for grant of summary disposition; LBP-944,31 NRC 67 (1990)10 CFA 1749(d)

bunim on poponent of summary disposition motion; 12P 944,31 NRC 69 (1990)+

10 CFA 1738 - .

litigability of chauenses to Commission repletions; IEP-90 6,31 NRC 101, IN,114 0990)

?- - litigsbility of challenges to haagrated surveillance plan methodology; IEP'90 4,31 NRC 710990)s;

10 CFA 1762(dXI)- _ .

.

secord chaties required to support,essertams of error en appeal; AIAB-926,31 NRC 9 (1990)-10 CFA 1764- Cornmiasion review of fun power licensing; CU-90-3[31 NRC 231 (1990) ~

,.

- criteria for stay of kninediaie effectiveness of onders; IEP 948,31 NRC 146 0990)iU purpose d knmediate effectiveness review; CU 90 3,31 NRC 224 0990)

10 CFA 1764(eX3XI) and (f)(2)(1),

- Canmiseica authosity to huervene and provids guidance in pending proceedings; CU-943,31 NRC 229 ''

. ..

~ 0990)--

.'10 CFA 1764(f)(2)(1)- corusat for Comnussion considerstim of licensing board decision on nonanded emergency planning - i_ .

..

' issme; CU-90 3,31 NRC 234 n.17 (1990) ,

- 10 CFA 1772(D'

referral of sequest for hessing to licensing board; ISP 901,31 NRC 119 (1990) ,

f i| .t'.' .' I;

, :n .

g.I

|

i| ,

'

1.'

. .

i

> t

)

.

*',

t

#_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ___.m._ _ _ _ _ _ -- _ .

[ [[ . pi kY. ' ,

' I.

9g n. . , 7 m- um ,,

yj, 44 -y,

1 4 i?

-{ w. i*,

t

''{'.. ( },. F J* 4-

_

' * i:b-O ~"

.!*, ._ ,

q, 4^

M' ,LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX'

- REGULATIONS 1 j,

4 ,

o, . . ,

,

?10 CSA'1785(a),1785(b)0) ~..

.

_

delegatim of authorky to appeal troards to review rulings referred by licensms beards; ALAB-929,31'

NRC 275 (1990)J ,

,10 CSA 1785(b)(1) L .- -

~!c- '

z +i'. standaal for decretianary irnerlocuary review; ALAR *19,31 NRC 278 a.2 0990)

s * .10 CFA 1785(d) . . .

.

!,

'

i' l- . authority of appeal boanis to certify questies to the Commamian; CU-942,31 NRC 199 (1990) ,

'

,,Q3 10 CJA 2.786(s) / . .. . .

|acape af Corrmussian suiharity to truervow and provide guidsace in pendmg procemhnes; CU-943,31',

' NRC 229 (1990)_' ' . _ f1

' "

'~

10 CFA 2.788 :erkeria far stay of bnrnadians effectiveness of ouders; ISP-948,31 NRC 146 (1990)1i

1' standsni for grant af a stay pending agveal; CLI-943,31 NRC 257 (1990) ;T<

Fm 10 CFA 2.78s(b) ' .~.

WT j peas lisait si stay rnaians; A1AB428,31 NRC 270 0990);

''

A '10 CJA 1788(e) ,,

' apphcandlity of stay crheria to enfoscernent proceedmas; IDP 90-8,31 NRC 146 0990)D '

F . : cnastia for 4 ' ; unesiat far stay pending aggen!; AIAB-928,31 NRC 267, 270 (1990):

- ;X '' 10 CFA Part 2c Suhpert i- fer submission and considentian of requests for fees; ALAB-929,31 NRC 281 n.6 (1990) -, - . -

~

10 CSA 2.1000 - '!applicability of Fgal Access to hetice Act to license suspens,an proceedmss; A1AB-929,31 NRC 282' 0990) .:,

10 CFA 11205(d)O)specinchy nf amas of concern required in request far informal bearing; 2P-943,31 NRC 46,47,50, .,

',u-

'' '>q

31 0 990) ,10 CFA 11205(g)

. .

; applicability of $4 mile radius rule to deconunissiatlas pieceedes: LBP.90 3,31 NRC 45,47 0990)bees far psummens efficer's suling on request tw a hearing; LBP 943,31 NRC 46 (1990) :

*

10 CFA 112050t) . - ~. ,' ~

_ ,,

J t right to nanow or broaden arena of concern in informal proceedings; LBP-90 3,31 NitC 50 (1990) , !pshowing necessary for raising a new issus in an infamat pra-%s; LBP-943,31 NRC 510990) ,

,,s r

' 10 CFA 11231 "!. need im hearing requentar to specify asess of concera prior to the Ahng of the hoanns file in the

, doakes; 12P-943,31 NRC 46 (1990) .' ' j

1

' .- 10 CSA 11231(b) . .

Jn . composition of hearing 61e; ISP 943,31 NRC 46 a.2 0990) --

.

.!is'

,

IJ C.FA 2.1233(c) ..J!" 2adequacy of radiation mamtering equipinent for plutonium pioomssms and fuel fabrication plant;i

LBP 9410, 31 NRC 302 0990) .' /

. . ( y,dienissal of party for failun to comply with specincity aqarements of, LBP-9010,31 NRC 316 ^ t'

>

(1990) - . .. .miennes of crheria for wrinen presentations to motion to strike; LBP 9010,31 NRC 294 (1990)

'

' 10 CFA 11233(d) and (e) .. ..

authority of prendas ofneer to strike unsuppaned evidence; ISP 9010,31 NRC 298,299 0990)to CIA 2.1233(e)

appropriansness of sunenary references to newspaper articles as evilentiary suppe:t in informal'

L

proceedings; LBP 9411,31 NRC 323 0990)autherhy of presiding of6cer to strike written presentations; ISP 9410,31 NRC 294 (1990)subsistuistion of motions to strike; IEP-9410,31 NRC 3% o.24 0990)

' 10 CFA 2.1239 .. . . . . .

[litigability of standards and procedures applied to daarmine release of lands fa unrestricted use; ,

| LBP 943,31 NRC 49 0990)-- :),

|

|'

*>

29

)f

?

,

g.!

'3

..

.

< i

|?'

t

,

gh e

*,

r,-

,- m -

.' - 4. t> : #tg y; ,.

y' 'h. . x .

+ ., '

L ' . V. .

, +

'

.y

', stW ,.

,

;

3;+- &

!- t,

i . ,i# ' >

, s4

h / LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX , '

)1 ft REQUIAI10NS '.

<

|'

,

,

* ' . 10 CFA 11239(b) . ..

-!"'

J $: litigsbuhy d regulatory sundanis; 1Ak903,31 h1C 49 0990) '.}..

-

- 10 CFA 9.37440fees fw MXA sequesas; CLJ-901,31 NRC 134 (1990)

10 CFA 9A0' ' '

[t . ' waiver of fees for RNA sequests; CLJ-90-0 31 NRC 134 0990) ',j

10 CFA hat 20- epplicehuity to adetin effects of temic and ndmetin anseriale;13PM11,31 h10 325 (1990) ;n'

6 population density sensiderations in standards for radiation espnem; ISPM11,31 NRC 322,334.

''?

. (1990)'- ,

).

"' = to CFA 30.l(b) .

| spy 4icabihty to tiennesse fw plutonian pucessing and fuel fabricatina plara; 1BPMid,31 NRC 297 ..

Ia.12 0990)

.- 10 CFA 20.16:) ..

4

.. dannitim of ALARA; A1AB.926,31 NRC 16 a.71 (1990),!

._

" 10 CFA 30.101, 20.102, 2a103, 2&l04, 30.105, 20.106 r '

W/ ' population density ennsiderations in standards int radiacim exposure; 12PMll,31 NRC 322 (1990).10 CFA Part 30 -- .,

'{performance of maissenance wa& en taletherapy equipraent wiihaut NRC enthodsation; ALAB 929,31. NRC 276 0990)-

= ' ,

'

.10 CFA M4(d) i

' dannition cf bypenews snatorial; LBPM7,31 NRC 122 0990) - ';_

' 10 CFA 30.4(q)-dannition of insearch and esulopment relative to puseessian of bytuaact snalerist; !.BP-90-7,31 NRC

121 (1990)~ ' ,

10 CFA 30.34(b)- ...

. *

naties and sensent requiremenis for transfer d lu:enses; 1 RPM 7,31 NRC 118,121,128 (1990); ,:(

IJPMS,31 NRC 145 46 (1990) J

10 CFA het 40, Aggendia A' - ..

htigsbuity of ' ' - and application of mDI tailings negalatims; ALAB-928,31 NRC 270 (1990)- - ,i10 CFA het 40, Appendia A, Cdieden 1- . . , , '. d

Why of eine for deponal of ndll tailings; 12PM9,31 NRC 155-57,184 0990) '

. 10 CF.R. hn 40, Appedix A, Caterien 6 ~ ,,

. design ad for cowr for dispenal caQ for miD 'silingi; ALAB-92A,3i NRC 266 (1990); 12PM9,31 NRC 192 0990) '

10 CFA 50.7 i. . 4 , L .

.,

s'issanians of anplayee reprbans at 'thikey Point; Di>90 l 31 NRC 329 0990) -|'

: 10 CFA M7(aX1) ' . ; . .

pseessenar. et linsnese employees participating as intervenars in licensing procesangs; 12PM5,31NRC 77 a.6 (1990)

' " ;

(- ' 10 CF.R. 50.34(b) ' .

:!: ;

eennera et Final Safety Analysis Report; CLl#2, St NRC 212 (1990)respesibuity for Gnal Anang reganfang signincant impact; 1 RPM 6. 31 NRC 98 0990),

10 CF.R. 50.34(b)(2)(1), (6)(i), (6,(iv) (6)(v), (1), (9), (c), (d) : r

consent of Final Safety Arnlysis Report; ClJM2,31 NRC 212 0990) :'

'

' 10 CFA 50A7 : , -

classincation of emergency planning standards as second4ier; ClJM2,31 NRC 203 (1990) ,,:

' weight given so FEMA (mangs en adequacy of emergency planning; ClJM3,31 NRC 249 nA7 j

0 990)10 CFA 50A7(s)i

,

adspacy of emergency planning for evacuation of beach populations; CLJM2,31 NRC 200 0990) .

.1

!

38 1

d

f:s:. ,

.-

J

N i

<

T'

. . , .

-

3

'

't , - - - " -_ m _ m_ _._______ _.__ ____._______ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ -._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ '

A #

r !

9,'Ka

''

jp e. g

M6 t; '

+4,

$i i

4

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX.

"s .

REGULATIONS

, . .- C

- 10 CFi M47(aXI) -1 interpsenation of *edequase passetive menswes"; C1JM2,31 htC 206 (1990)

insteriahty d lack of impismaning datan in smo cmergency plan to nasonable assurance 6adeg;C1JW3,31 NkC 247 (1990) .

10 CFA M47(aX2)- nasonabis assurance standard for determining edequacy of emersecy planning; CLIM2,31 NRC 214

. (1990),10 C.FA M47(b) '

.. .

+

- basis for judging adequecy of energewy planning; C1JW2,31 NRC 213,217 0990)relevance of amanded erwrgmcy planning issues to licensing proceeding; C1JM3,31 NRC 231

~

0 990):..10 CFA 5047(b)(1), d)

' !leu.a of agreernau, naed for, QJM3,31 NRC 232 (1990)|p ,, 10 CFA 50c(bX5)1?

letters of samart with local radio stadons for public nouncation during radiological emersacies,'

need far,12Berkt,31 NRC 20,24 (1990) '10 CFA M47(bX8) -

facDities and equipnent required to suppott emergency response; C1JM3,31 NRC 253 (1990)identiacation of special-needs population for evacuation planning; C1JW3,31 NRC 215 (1990)

10 C.FA M47(b)(10) .evacuauon time estimates for advanced hfe support patwras; C1JMS,31 NRC 2 0,250 0990)<

facuities and equipmssa required in suppoet emergency aspese; C1JM3,31 NRC 253 0990)need to include shehering es prosective action in emergency plans; C1JM3,31 NRC 244 (1990)

10 CFA M47(c)corseat for Comrasssim considernden of licensing board decision en sananded anergency plannmg'

adequacy; C1J 00-3,31 NRC 234 n.17 (1990)- 10 CIA 50.47(cXI) I,

effect of orpeal board romand on license issuance; C1JM3,31 NRC 228 (1990)= 10 CFA M47(cXIXiii)(B) . 4

best-effons essenpdan opplied to arate parucystion in emergency nsponse where state has not -, Participated in emergmcy planning; IEIA901,31 NRC 30 (1990)

10 CFA M48 <,,

1 - applicabihty of criminal sanctions inder, C1JW3,31 NRC 208 0990)1

10 CFA M49ovaluadan of 44 year plant life fran initial operation GP-946,31 NRC 106 0990) ,

10 CFA 50.51. procedure for cuanding an operating license; GP 904,31 NRC 93 (1990)10 CFA 50.55a. litigability d concerns dealing with applicability of regulations; IEPM6,31 NRC 103 (1990)periods of opendon beyond period of operedng license as major federal actions: GP 90-6,31 NRC 95

(1990) . ~' i

.10 CFA 50.55a(cX4): . .

conformance with codes acablished aher plant construction; 12PM6,31 NRC 104 (1990)

10 CFA 50.57(dXI)-(9)' authority to issue tempcriry operating licenses; 1RP-946,31 NRC 95 isti (1990)

10 CFA 50.58(b)(6) 'litigability of challesiges to no significant hazards consideration determination; GPM6,31 NRC 90 -

~ 0990)10 CFA M60(a). materials 4 - for pressun containment boundary; GP 904,31 NRC 60 (1990)10 CFA 50.61

scope of litigable issues in license amendment prMng; GPM4,31 NRC 70 0990)

i

31,

t

. .

'

# .

y #.

1

,

b"IIGAL CITATIONS INDEX

RF.GUIATIONS4

>1

k -

10 CFA 50.90 ..

appheability to aquesa to recapture renod of constructim by use of an operating hcess amendmant;LBP 90 6,31 NRC 44 (1990)

10 CFA 50.91(aX4)no stairnficant hazank determinanon for extensim of pressureAemperatum hmits; IEP-944,31 NRC 56

0 990)10 CFA 50.92

mandani for determimng hconse amendmers requesta;12P-946,31 NRC 103 (1990) ?

10 CFA hn 50, Appenda A. ODC 31'

C estensirm of pressureAanperatine tunita; ISP 90 4,31 NRC 56, CO (1990)10 CFA ha 50, Appeda 11 -

applicabuity to plutnnhan processing and fus! fabrication plant; 13P-94)Q,36 NRC 296 97 (1990)10 CFA hn 50, Amanda E. IV

evecuanan time estimates for advanced life suppen patients; CL1-943,31 NRC 240 0990)10 CFA Part 50, Appendia E,IV.D. louers of agnusnent with laeal radio stations for public notification during radiological emersaicies,

need fw, IAP-941,' 31 NRC 20, 24 (1990)10 CFA Part 50, Agaida E IV.D.3

interpretation of 15-maste emergency noti 6 cation requirement; LEP 941,31 NRC 31 (1990) .10 CFA Part 50, Appenda O

service period fee fracture toustmess values; LBP-944,31 NRC 60 0990)i

10 CFA Part 50, Amasdia 11costuct and adepacy of integated surveillance progam; IEP.90-4,31 NRC 66 0990)

10 CF.R. Part 50, Ayoidts 11 II.Chtigability of challenges to NRC apswoved lategated Surv J1ance Program; ISP-944,31 NRC 57

0 990)use of irradiated test maierials from one test reactor to redict facture toughness of materials in- anaher mactor, ISP-944,31 NRC 61 (IP90)

A

10 CFA Part 50, Amendia 11,11.Cl .

similarity of design and operating futures of reactors in imegrated surveinance plan; ISP 9054,31

. NRC 70 0990) ,,

10 CFA Part 50, Amedia II, II.C3 e.

. ' contingency w2 - for use of integrned surveillance program; ISP.944,31 Mtc 610990),10 CFA 51.20(aX7)

' EIS muirmnanta fur materials license renewal; ISP 9410,31 NRC 298 (1990) .10 CFA 51.20(b) ,

* review sepiaments far construction period recapime amaidment; 1RP-946,31 NRC 97'!- .

0 9901-~ types of acticus sequiring preparation of an envhenmental impact statement; ISP-90 6,31 NRC 96 q

!- _ (1990)'

10 CFA 51.20,5121,' sad 5132categoriastam of acnnns by type of environmental review required; IEP 946, St NRC 97 (1990)

10 CFA 51.21,51.22(c)types of acnets requiring and environmental amessnent; IDP-946,31 NRC 96 (1990),

10 CFA 51.31responsibility for determuung need for envinamental impset statement; ISP 90 6,31 NRC 97 (1990)

'10 CF.R. 5132no signincant impact 6nduig for materials license anewal; 12P-9410,31 NRC 298 (1990)

10 CFA 51.45envuonmental analynea required far entmsion of operating license in recapture construction period;

12F946,31 NRC 94,97 (1990)

32

*y|.

-

t

q+ rp q , s4

, ,,

- ,-

y t, ,

p - , > ;,

,.,

t-

k . LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX ',

N REOUIA710NS

h iir '

O.y . .-(.; 10 CFA 5132 . .

. ' i,

litigabuny of eallenges to Commissian regulaties; 13P-944,31 NRC 101 (1990)4 s'f10 CFA 51.52. Tahle 5 4 ="

applicebuity to envimnmental knp. css of trouponaden 'ef waste; 12P.943,31 NRC 49 (1990)10 CFA $1.53 -

,

. -.O ~' review . - for eenstrucnan period receptare amesdment; IJP-946,31 NRC 97

4. . (lWO)10 CFA $133(a) . . .

issues psincribed in ependng license pieceedings; 13P.946,31 NRC 95 (1990)r

'lidgebility of spent fuel shipments in gersting license amendrnant proceedr.g to recapture construedanperiod; 13P 946,31 NRC 95 (1990)

'10 CFA 51.9$(s)- .

,

- leaues proscribed in operating liceies proces&ngs; I.BP.946,31 NRC 95 (1990)'

e

'10 CFA 51.102(c) . . .|docunents farming earnplete envisnrnental recond of decision; A1AB.926,31 NRC 17 n?8 (1990)'

'

110 CFA St.106(c)issues presenhad in epseting license pc e==diiw; 1AP.946,' 31 NRC 95 (1990)

.10 CFA 61.102 -applicabuisy to maiorials license nnewal for phnenhan gencessing and fuel fabricatie plant; 12P.9410, *

"7' 31 NRC 2*9 (1990)~

r*10 CFA 70.4(r) . . , . .

,

quality assurance requirements for plutonian processing and fuel fabrication plant; 1RP-9410,31 NRC,

. 296 (1990) .'

10 CFA 70.22(aX2), (4).

.

content of aggdication for license for plutonium proconses and fuel fabrication plant; 12P.90-10,31NRC 304,305 n.21 (1990)

10 C.FA 70.22(aX2), (6), 0), and (3)eenhqude and inushAm considerations in giality assurance program fa plutonium proce6.|'s and fuel

fabsicaden plant; 12P.9010,31 NRC 303 (1990),

10 CFA 70.22(f)applebuity nf quality assurance crkeria to for pluunium processing and fuel fabricatim plant;

12P.9010,31 NRC 29697 (1990) . . .r.'

eardquake and brushke consideraties in quality assurance program for plutonian processing and fuel'L

fabsicatian p;as ; LRP 9010,31 NRC Sol (1990) .- 10 CF.R. 70.22(1)(IXaiii) '

spy 4icabuity to cuneslative effects from radioactive and chenical substances from plutmium pmcassing J'. 1 and fuel fabacation plant; 13P.90-10,31 NEC 301 (1990)

510 CFA 70.22(k)applicabuity to licensees for pisanian pmcessing and fuel fabrication plant; 12P.90-10,31 NRC 297

n.12 (1990) -,

10 C.FA 70.23(aK3)-' ad-p=#y of radiation mautonna equspment for pluinnium pecessing and fuel fabricatim plant;

.'o ' 13?-9410,31 NRC 302 (1990).10 C.FA 10.23(aX3) and (4)';eenhquake and biushbo considerations in quality assurance program for pivianium pececesing and fuel

g

fabrication plant; 1EP.9010,31 NRC 303 (1990)10 CFA 70.31(d)

. appbcebility to licensees for plmonium pmcassing and fuct fabrication plant; IEP-9010,31 NRC 297a.12 (1990)

<s 10 CF.R.1031-apphcabuity to liceuses fas plutonium processing and fuel fatricatian plant; IJP'9010,31 NRC 297 -

n.12 (1990)

33 -

3 > g --

. .

\

-3,|

|..

l- 3

>

.t

,

4

_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

.-- , , ,

I;;, f

, ,

+ r

'

,, .;-p, s ,

, ,

p

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX1

REOUIATIONS-

ig-!'

- 10 CFA 70.57 ' . .

processing and fuel fabricanon plant; '

.

',

. maissiale centrol and escounting equiremeras for ;'--'

IAPM10,31 NRC 297 (1990)- 10 CFA 70.58 .

.

[ oppiacobility to llomsees fw plwanian prwassing and fust fabricanon plans, ISP-9010, ?! NRC 297n.12 (1990)

- 10 CFA 70.39 >

-._ for efauas releases frorn 3 utonium pmcassing and fuel fabricadon plent;'

? . mporting , _ 4

G 12PM10,31 NRC 297 (1990)M 10 CFA 73.23(aT2)(4)

apptoability to,wenn.cs fw plutarden processing and fust fabrication plant; IRP.90'10,31 NRC 297. . a12 (1990)

0- 10 CF.t 73.57applica uhr W licensees fw plutoniwa pacessing and fust fabrication plant; IEP-9010,31 NRC 297s

, ~

m.42 (1990) t*,.

[,. 1!' 10 CF A 10(111''dusanction busween anergency planning regulations and siting and engineering design aquirements;+-

CL1-943,31 NRC 208 0990)5 -40 CFA 1%r 61- ' '

applicabGity to materials license renewal far plaumiun processing and fuel fabrication plant; IEP.9010, -~ , 31 NRC 299 0990)

40 CFA Part 61. Suhratt T g

appliosbusy to thodan mill tailings; 13P 90 9,31 NRC 192 0990) ~-

' 40 CFA 19alo >j1w , raerials license venewal far plutoniurn pmcasms and fuel fabsicacian plars; IEP-9410, .St NRC 299 (1990)

- 40 CFA 192.32(b)0h 192.410989) . .

design standard for cover for disposal cou far rnal taihnes; 133L949,31 NRC 192 (1990): 40 CFA 1504.' ,

applicabihey to NRC relatin to intesagency disputes; 13P-949,31 NRC 153 0990) ,

i*f.

' h

j' ' ]i

.

'

[ t

'

,

rwL :'

,

' ;

,

,

'('f !.-

i i

b'{-

,

o.

,.-

o 1 1

.

.

o ;

|-i

1-

'|,

'I. J

%

b

i

i

- - _ ___. . _ _ _ _

> . , ,

i,-

,

|,

2

: . .i ni|

'

|-

,

1 ,, .' ;

fn. 'e

k

~1 *j ,

1

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX"

>

STATUTI'S -

|

sr? '

| Adnunarsuve Procedus Act, 5 U.S.C. 554(a)statutory requuements for m-the-record heanngs; A1AB-929, 31 NRC 280, 282 (1990)I

Adminmranve Procedure Act, 9(b), 5 U.S.C 558(c) >. ,1

appheabihty to hcmse revocauens AIAB-929, 31 NRC 285-86, 288 (1990),

Ammic linergy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2014(e)(2) (1982)' *

. . ,

classification of thanum mill taihngs as byproduct maanal; LBP M9,31 NRC 152 (1990)Atomic linnrgy Act, 84(aXI), 42 U.S C 2114(a)(1) j

cost-bmefit balancmg for managanent of thonum mut taihngs, LEPM9,31 NRC 158,163 (1990) MAtomic linergy Act,104,42 U.S.C 2234

NRC junsdictim over pardes and alienatility of heennes; ISPM7, 31 NRC 126 (1990)Atomic l'nergy Act,161(b), (i)

' .

interpretanon of 6:st-uer protecuan standards for emergency planmng; CIJ 942,31 NRC 202@ (1990)Atornic Energy Act,16t(b), (i), and (o) g -

| classtfratim af emergency plannmg standards as second<ia, CLI-942, 31 NRC 203-05, 208 (1990) - $ -

.D,. [P|Atomic bergy Act,181, 42 U.S C 2231

' appbcabihty of Administrative Procedure Act provisions u maienals hemse suspmstons, AIAD 929,31 w *. . -NRC 285, 288 (1990)

| Atanic Imergy Act, 182(a) Q he

interpretanan of fLmaior protection standards for emergency planrung, CIJ 942, 31 NRC 202 (1990) <

i Ammic Energy Act,182a i

i responsihihues of heensee for plutonium processing and fuel fatocauon plant; IEP 9010, 31 NRC 297 @ ' J" |*

n.12 (1990) g |Ammac Energy Act,183,42 U.S C. 2233(c) i

pmsenpum agamst transfer of hcenses; IEP-90-7,31 NRC 121 (1990) ,

I

| Atomic linergy Act,184, 42 U.S.C. 2234nouco and cesant 4... .a for transfer af hces-c; IEPM7, 31 NRC 118,120,128 (1990),

IRP 90-8, 31 NRC 14546 (1990)s y |Aionde linergy Act,186, 42 U.S C 22M(b)

apphenbihty of Admuustrauve Pmcedute Act provmons to hcense revocauens: AIAB 929. 31 NRC 285 |

(1990) |

Atonue linergy act,186b j

need is formal heanns on materials hcense suspensior., AIAB 929, 31 NRC 287 (1990) jAtonuc hergy Act,189a, 42 U.S C 2239(a) i

u iconcepts of standing apphed to NRC proceedmg; IRPM6, 31 NRC 89 (1990)interest reqtumnents for intervention in operating bcense amendmment parcedmg; LDPM6, 31 NRC .

84 (1990)'

hugability of challenges to no sigmficant hazards consideration determmauon; IEP-946, 31 NRC 90,,

|i

(1990)Atomic Energy Act,189a(1), 42 U.S C. 2239(aXI) . .

|

determinauon of whether an en-the record hestma is required. AIAB.929, 31 NRC 282 85 (1990) . .

need for formal heanng on matenals license suspension; ALAB 929,31 NRC 283 n.8 (1990)+

*

|||'

335 < |

-. |.

. .\

. ,

"

E "I

1

i

11

1

- ,

3

w

I

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEXSTATLTITA =

'

t-.' UL | Amnic Encegy Act,191 ,

-

periods of operarim beyond pened of operenna licane as maja federal actions; ISP-904,31 NRC 95.(1990)

- Clean Air Act 309,42 U.Sc 7609parisdictim over pmposed disposal ce!!; LDP-90-9. 31 NRC 153 a.9 (1990)

, Emrgy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Pub.1. No.1(n371,502,102 Stat. 857 (1982)natricnons on award of attorneys' fees; ALAB-929,31 NRC 277 (1990)'

Energy Reorganization Act,210purpose d employee prtsaction prwman; ISP 945,31 NRC 77 78 (1990)restrienve language in settlemera agreement; CL1-941,31 NRC 133 (1990) -naalianan against employees for repenna safety emcorns; DD941,31 NRC 329 (1990)

Ik ual Access to Jusuce Act. 5 U.sn 544lentinamesa of heensee in enforcement action in anorneyo' fea; ALAB-029,31 NRC 277 (1990)

Equal Access to Justice Act 5 U.Sc 544(aXI), (b)(IXC)defmium af ' adversary adjudacatim"; A1AB-929,31 NRC 279 (1990)

Equal Access to Justice Act,5 U.SA 504(bXIXCXil)types of decisions caered by; A1AB 929,31 NRC 250 (1990)

,

Equal Access to Justice Act. 5 U.S.C. 504(b)Q)statmory requipmems for m de record bearings; A1AB429,'31 NRC 210 n.4 (1990)

Equal Access to Justice Act,5 U.S.C 54t(c)(1)applicabihty la formal NRC penceedings in s'aence of statutory requinment for auch heannss;

ALAB 929,31 NRC 288 (1990)pmcetures fw submission. and emsideration of requests far fees; A1AB-929,31 NRC 281 (1990)

Low-Lavel Radioscuve Waste Pohey Anundments Act of 1985,5(dX2Xc)state obhastions aqanling waste generated in that state; LilP-946,31 NRC 93 0990)

National Environmental 3%cy Act,102(2XC),42 U.SC 4132(2XC)'

wasiderane of therbanves to constructaan period scepture amendment; LBP 946,31 NRC 99 (1990)E11 sequirereents tw maiorials license nnewst; IEP-9410,31 NRC 298 (1990)

National Environmersal 3%cy Act,102(2XE),42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(E)standad for consideration of alternatives to proposed licensing action; 1RP-946, St NRC 99 (1990)

NRC Atuhosization Act, Pub.1. Na 97415,20,96 S',aL 2067,2(T/9 (1983)cost-benent balancing for managanent of tharium null tailings; ISP 949,31 NRC 158 099(*

Peb,1. No. 404, ch. 324,9(b),60 Stat. 231, AL2 (1946) 'i'

need far formal hearing en :nsierials license suspension; A1AB 929,31 NRC 216 (1990)Puh I. No. 96481,203(c),94 Stat 2325 (1980)

-

awards in administrative actions; AIAB 929,31 NRC 280 (1990)

r

$

.~

|'

36

|

|

L

-- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -

r

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEXOTilERS

2 K. Devu, Adminisuauve law Treatise (12:10, at 450 (2d ed 1979)apphcabuuy of APA sectam 558(c) to heane revocatens; AIAB.929,31 NRC 287 (19H))

Federal Rule of Civu Pnwedue 56psocehus fcr summary dispositaan; 1.ItP.944, 31 NRC 66 st6 (1990)

it.R. Rep. Na 120, 99th Cmg., :st Sess., pt. 1, at 4, repruued in 1985 U.5 Code Ceg. &Admin. News 132, 133

purpose of F aal Access to Justice Act; AIAB.929,31 h1C 280 (1990)4II.R. Rep. No 884, 9% Cong , 2d Sess. 47, reprused in 1982 U.S Code Cong & Adnun. News 3603,

3617cost-benent balancing for maruganent of dunum mill uilmas; utP-949,31 h1C 158 et19,161 n.30

(1990)II.R. Rep. No 884,9M Ces, 2d Sesa. 4710982)

cost.benent balancing for managanent of tharium mill taihngs, IBP-949,31 NRC 161,163 (1990)II.R. Rep. Na 1418,9% Cms., 2d Sea. 54, ispunud in 1980 U.S Code Cmg. & Admut News 4984

purpose of F aal Access to Justsce Act; Af.a3 929,31 NRC 280 (1990)45. Rep. No 1677, 87th Ceg., 2d sees., reprused in 1962 U.S Code Cmg. & Admin. News 2207, 2213

need fur fennal hearms un matenals hcense suspension, A1AB-929,31 NRC 284 (1990)1 Suff of Je&nt Canuniure m Atonne Enagy, 87th Cong ,1st Sess., impioving the AEC Regulatary

Pnweis 72 Omnt Canun. Pont 1%1)need for formal hearms en materials hcense suspension, A1AB-929, 31 NRC 284 (1990)

-

37

l

| _ -- .__. _ _ _ _ _ _ __. ._ __ __ ___ _ _. . . _ , . .

|' .

-

s

| . .,

%. ,*

r,s x 1,..

'

.e

.+,,

,.

SL'Ilji'C"! IND13 ; -- 9

*..

ACCIDl;V!1| emergency plarmmg considerauons, CLJ#2, 31 NRC 197 (1990)

~

+

| ADDf71VI 17114T3 - <- *af raeuscuve and deemical wasus, (JIP-9410, 31 NRC 293 0940), IJIPell 31 NRC 3:9 0990

. j- ^ADJUDICA1 DRY lit (Kil:DINOS

' # i

einsaderstum d assues involved in rulemakmg CtJ 90 2, 31 NRC 197 0990) - |dur pnxess, C1J 943, 31 NRC 219 (1990) i

jADMINISTRATIVF PROCI. DURE ACT - w'

farmel haanns requirernents under, ALAB 929,31 NRC 271 (1990).~

! ADVANCf2) LJIT $UPloin PA11thT3 %| evacuatum ume asumais far, C1J 903, 31 NRC 219 (1990)

, ,

l ALTI;RNATIVI.3-- assues an eensidessunn af, ALAB 928,31 NRC 20 09'A)

APPL.Al, BOARD 3 N'abhgauan la s.rept aferred ruluigs, AIAB 929,31 NRC 2710990)

standasd for overuarnmg e boensing boar (g 'mengs, A1All 926,31 NRC 1 (1940) -

' ' '

i standards af verww, Al All-926,31 NRC 1 (1990) ;

| stay authenty; ALAB 924,31 NRC 20 0990)APl1.A1.5

'

'

( lauerlocuury, aumonty in review reformd ruhngs, ALAB 929,31 NRC 2710990) ' lstay pending resolutum af, CLJMS,31 NRC 219 0990) -

|

AQUll1.R3.

|

I*Wn dalamtis, rederge asumsies fur, IJIP 84 9, 31 NR( aSO 0990)ATOF.sc I;NEROY Act

.. ..

|

| > anng requiremerus for twenw revocaums and suspensums, A1All 929. 31 NRC 2710990)noennes dutaan under, IJIP 941,31 NRC 116 0990) * .

j. reparung seguirements for lueneses, LJIP 907,31 NRC 116 0990)

( 'vansfer af ownerslup, nauficauan and eenseni regiairemerus fur, IJIP 90 7, 31 NRC 116 (1990) 1

HIAdi 10PULA110N$ -y,

"slininervig oansuleratuwe m amargerary planning, CLJW3,31 NRC 219 (1990)

BOARDSSee Appeal Boards, liceumang Boards i #

BRILL 1,

" *appellats, peoord surpan required in. AIAll 926, 31 NRC 1 0990)

,

standants far pro ao unervenars AIAll 926, 31 NRC 10990).

DURDl'.N OF PROOI --

,' ~

distanguished frvun hunion af gamg forward. A1A'' ''W TI NRC 1 (1990)CONORl!OATE CARE FACitJ11Es

,' '

adequacy af, C1J 903, 31 NRC 2'9 0990) *,,

(X)N51,RVA115MS,, '

~'

in enslynes of unpset of engmeered deposal cell far thurium mill udv p.1J6P 909,31 NRC. . <

0 990).

9 .

4 6

%

t

,r *

b

_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ . _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

-

g; .

i,

i

EUl! JECT INDEX |i

'..

h.h' CX)Pf!AINMtNT DUlllMNO>

' ear synan, : . af be4ur air supply = taPM2, St NRC 38 (1990). ,

>(XWfAMINATIONphnenian pseessum in two of, ISPM10,31 NRC 293 (1990)

COST.BliNf3TT ANALY$1,8

|" is sensidemium of sher.astiws to engineered depumal cell fw puwman mill inilings, Al.AD 928,31" NRC 363 (1990)4; CYANIDE

in wease mswnals et Wem Chnso siis ISPM9, St NRC 130 (1990),! DEX3510N

beeneing banni, as emwdmen of fmal en/ " sisionea; ALAD 936,31 NkC I (1990)

E Dl%X)MMISS10NINGfunds, odequacy d, alsove w treeperehte in)ry claims im purpane of onnaining a stay; C1JW3,31'

NRC 219 (19eo)psueending, sendmg to inservene in; 1APW3,31 NRC 40 (1990)

IMiC0fffAMINAT10N,

m.fmooners orden, owlmWhip of sectism 2.788 ur, ISP 90 8, St NRC 143 (1990)IMSCRIMINATION

emeinsi liemmes ernplayees fcs repeting safay eawerrs; DD-941, St NRC 327 (1990)

D15QUAlll1CA110Ngd spedal essataan in infremal proceedeg.12P#3,31 NRC 40 (1990)^

[' DOCUM12(TAT 10Nof ofdlls and inadmis, need for, fin special nuclear enaierials lanse venewst; tar 9410,31 NRC 293

(1990)DOSE (X)N81!QUENCI;3

censuleratiat b evolusung emergency plans; ClJM2,31 NRC 197 (1990)LARnlQUAKES

ensidereden in special nucisar rwarials tweme senewal nicosang; 12PD10,31 NRC 293 (1990)I, *ECONOMIC ISSUI.8

considersuem in decisinnmaking on earn;&ance eith emergewy planning safety reguladana; CtJW3,31

NRC 219 (1990)IMf20ENCY ItROADCAST SYg11;M

nquirement in use to notify petic of edir.lghal enwigency; !Jit931,31 NRC 19 (1990)I;M*01;NCY EXfillCISI'$ . -r

ansha, sequest to sospen secord m; QJMS,31 NRC 219 (1990)I;MilkOENCY HANNINO

ear 6 des eensidersuans in; QJMt 21 NRC 197 (1990)~ basis fu segunament; CLIMA St NRC 197 (1990)"a emaderaties in decisusanaking an adequacy of; QJ 943,31 NRC 219 (1990)Asmaior geenessian efforded by; CLJM2. 31 NRC 197 (1990)obssedves of; CLl#1 St NRC 197 (1990)pam-hearing resabaum of issues; QJM S,31 WRC 219 (1990)staus of, for beanne authodsatim; C1J 90 3,5: NRC 219 (1990)

I;MI2OliNCY PLANSweight given to FIMA nnenes en adequacy of; QJ 90% St NRC 197 (1990)

IMPLF"ti 8See Ucensee Banplopes

ENIm0Y RIORGANIZATION ACTandement osmisnents under esetlan 210, QJ 901,31 NRC 131 (1990)

1.N18DRCI. MINT .

of ednunistadve subpoens, denial of request im patsalve order to sisy; C1J 941,31 NRC 131 (1990)LNK)RCEMINT ORDl;R j

recansidwetian of stay of effectiveness of; ISP-948,31 NRC 143 (1990) ;

de

h

|.

||

|c- r

t-

SUlijECT INDi'X

t

YIfi ' EhTIRONMEh'TAL ASSESSMENT

h far special nuclear matensis license venewat need fur,12P 9410,31 NRC 293 (1993)' y| LNVIRONMfWI AL IMPACT STATEMENT.

let eansuucum panod recaptus amendrners, need fw, ISPM6,31 NRC 15 (1990);2,

' i! 1:NVIRONMINTAL RIA*11,[~ mquiremerus fw eanarucum penad receptus emmutmeins;13b906,31 NRC $$ (1990)

|f EQUAL ACCl35 TO JUS 11CE ACTUi opplicebility to materials heanse suspension proceedings: A1AD 929,31 NRC 271 (1990)I, traerpsmanan of advanery yeaceeding; AIAB 929,31 NRC 271 (1900)

1: VACUA 110N'

of special needs populsums; QJ 943,31 fi s. 219 (1990)

L l'YACUATION 11ME 15f!MA113L fw odvented ide support getsass; QJ 943,31 NRC 219 (1990)

eesional opgwnae to esesum of; C1J 903,31 NRC 219 (1990)f:VRMINCli .

t>urden d genna farwand with: AIAB-936,31 NRC I (1990),,

f 71:DERAL 1:MERGINCY MANAGEMINT AGl!NCYweight given to fnhnpa en adequacy of emagency plans; C1J-942,31 NRC 197 (1990)'

. 11;DERAL REO!51TR|

sufficiency d wtdicade of suaice in, to eten intervenna of heensing senans; ISP-943,3: NRC 73V t| (1990)

nNAL ENVIRONMINTAL $1ATEMENT;

bcensing Imani decisim os emendment d; AIAD 924 St NRC 1 (1990)11R13

pluuedum seleases dunns: 1RP 9010,31 NRC 293 (1990) ]IllACIURE TOUOltN135

Cherry V nose test fa, lap 90-4,31 NRC 34 (1990)OROUNDWATIA

effect of enginessed dispraal cell for tharium mill tailings on; 1RP-909,31 NRC 150 (1990)IIEARLNOS

farenal, deserminants d need far, AIAB 929, St NitC 271 (1990)infarmal, maties to strike in; IJIP 9410,31 NkC 293 (1990): 1AP-9411,31 NRC 320 (1990)

l'en twense sevncedans and suspensims; AIAD 929,31 NRC 271 (1990)en smotenals igeness, type seguired; AIAle929, St NRC 271 (1990)

IMMEDIATE FJ11!C11VEN135 REVIEWpwpass ef; QJ-943,31 NRC 219 (1990)

INK * MAL PROCEEDINGSdaquatinondan of fwist assistars; IJP-943,31 NRC 40 (1990) '

munkms to suihm in, ISP 9410, St NRC 293 (1990); 12P 9411,31 NRC 320 (1990)Ih*! TORA 1TD $UltV1311ANCE PROGRAM

similar venus idenucal aparating features f- eaupliance with regulauans; 12P 904,31 NILC 34 (1990)IN(LRPRETA110N

of adversary procee&ng: AIAD 929,31 NRC 271 (1990)of * aspect" in 10 CIA 2.714; IJIP-90-6,31 NRC 85 (1990)of 10 CIA 5047(b); C1J 942,31 NRC lir; (1990;of 10 CIA Part 40, Appen&a A, Criminn la 12P 949, St NRC 150 (1990) '

statutory, starting paint far, ALAB-929,31 NRC 27) (1990)th'!12VENORS

pm es, standards for briefs; ALAB-926, St NRC 1 (1990)INTERVIN!10N

espect voquiremma fe,12P 946. 'l NitC 85 (1990)

dl

i

'

.

f.

I,l

.-,

,..,

Ly ,

i

SUlUi:CT IN1)i'X i

ri

IKt13VENTION, IATEfwiscaer tesi far,13P45,31 NRC 73 (1990)good cavas for; 13PMS,31 NRC 73 (1990)by beeness employes, fear of sonabatica inen tummes a gaud uuss far,13P 90$. 31 NRC 73 (1990)

i nouly erming talwmaum u said uuse for,12PMS,3t NRC 73 (1990)sehance en erusher pony to apnsera mie's intensis sa smal cause fur, ISPM5, St NRC 73 (1990)wasim them to resumal for beundsning d issues in deiermining grara ef, ISPMS,31 NkC 73

| (1990)! *sista given to yearsal far deley in deiermining grere of; IJIPMS,31 NRC 73 (1990)

,

| JURI$DICI10NNRC, whom ownwelup has bem transformd widuna consent d NRC; 13PW7. 31 NkC 116 (1990) i

' II.ACitA1E .

frmn weinsered dmpassi cell far thurium mill talhnss; 13PM9,31 NRC 150 (1990) *

LLT!1*S OP AOREEMINT! with astonis and edient penannel, C1JW3,31 NRC 219 (1990)

IJCENSEE !!Mr%YIISnote iniorvenue tened a fear of raiabatim inen twensee, ISPMS,31 NRC 73 (1990)esprinsis against, le repr. rung safety sancoras; DD 941, St NkC 327 (1990)e-

j vostriotian en reparting of safety encans cimugh settlemers agreement Ctj 941,31 NRC 131 (1990),

ir 1JCENSEIS

quehfissuana to handle special nuclest materials; 12PM10, St NRC 293 (1990)transfer d ownestup, constreints on; 13PM7,31 NRC 116 (1990)

,

|IJCIWSINO DOARDSeuihnetty to seier suhnsa; AIAB429,31 NRC 271 (1990)

blat!*lALS ACCOUNTAh!!ITY ,

by pluumium pmoansing and fast fabricanian facility; 12PW10,31 NRC 293 (1990),

MAT 121ALS U(INSE AMENDMINTto espase of tharium snill tallmes in enginessed dmposa! cell; ALAB 928,31 NRC 263 (190),

125t949,31 NRC 150 (1990)I

MATERIALS UCENSB SUSPI:NSION 190CErDINOSappheshility of lupual Access to Justice Act so; A1AB-929,31 NRC 271 (1990)

MIU. TA!!JN05therium, abspasal in engineered depasal cou; ALAB 928,31 NRC 263 (1990)

M(TrlON TO RfDi1:N e

on Proposed opersung license enandment opphcauun, denia' of; 13PN2,31 NRC 38 (1990)MO710NS 'II) STRIER

in infurtnal procemenas; the#10,31 NRC 293 (1990); 13PWil 31 NRC 320 (1990 ,

NATIONAL ENVIRONMINTAL POtJCY Aliscansmie issues in eensidentian of thematives; A1AB 928,31 NRC 263 (1990)enc _. -" report , - for eamsuneum period recepeus amedmansa;13PM6,31 NRC 45

(1990)lisenaang board decisian ea amendmus d final envirmmensat stasemana; AIAB-926,31 NRC 1 (1990)

NElfiltON ItUINCaseffect on susciar vessel; 13PM4, St NRC $4 (1990)

NIL DUC111I!Y 111ANETflONrefsenes temperature for,13PM4,31 NRC 54 (1990):

NO 810NI!1 CANT ltA7ARDS CONSIDERNt10N DETERMINA110Nlaissbility d,138t946,31 NRC 85 (1990)

N(FI111CA110N- af NRC of transfer of facihty ownuship, sequinenents for,12P947, Al NRC 116 (1990)

of public of reachgical emergency, cunphance d applicaru's plan with segulatary requirernenw;ISPMI,31 NRC 19 (1990) ,

' of spedal facilities 8 ,a energency; CUM 3,31 NRC 219 (1990) ,

;

42P

>x..,7, -

't)

SU10ECT INDEX .

a

NRC STAWa

pamImanns senahaian of W (1JW3,31 NRC 219 (1990)NUCILAR RIDUIATORY CUMMIS$10N -

enforcenere of sukoenes. CtJWI,31 NRC 1310990)..

1Snedunum where ownerilup tw teen traruformt wutmut eurseet of NRC112P 947,31 NRC 116

-

0 990)sigerviewy authnrtty; CLJW3,31 NRC 219 (1990)

OPI.RATINO tr1NSE AMI:NDMENT !ehnese in tecL*al specification far pressweAemperature lindts; thPW4,31 NRC $4 0990)esmetrucium period secapus; 13P#6,31 NRC 55 0990)-i

! fe dwpanal d accidem genomied weier at THI-2; ALAD-926,31 NRC 1 (1990)withdwe=1 of apphceuen for, IJtP 941 St NRC $$ 0990)i-

OW.RATINO IJCIWSE PROCI;E!XNOS!

*

!' tuuluple-bemed, pendency of reopenmg mann bdos are board as excuss for umanely fains of madan '

to senpa., bdon the uher boasd, A1All-927,31 NRC 137 0990) ',

L OPERATINO IJCINSE3 teusharissuen, pendmg oumpleum d romand proosedag; CLJ443,31 NRC 219 0990)

PtJJf0NIUMliquid, handhng at 300T;13P#10,31 NRC 293 0990)

{&= to farm d contendnetum; 12PM1(L 31 NRC 293 0990) '

sensenes dunng fues; 12P 90L10,31 NRC 283 0940)!

emuse pe 4 aging far shipmas ef; 12P 9410,31 NRC 203 0990)POPULATION DIN $TIY r

earmideraties in speasel nuclear ensierials Loense serwwn! geweedang; 12P410,31 NRC 293 (1990);;ISP 9411,31 NRC 320 0990) i

PREDICTIONS .

of imp.4 et engineered disptual cell far thoriurn mill talhngs, nature of supportmg analyses for,tar-949,31 NRC 130 0990)

PRI3$URE/II;MPERATURE IJMfilfor seness vessels; 13PW4,31 NRC 54 0990)

PROOPSee Burden of Pmal '

PROTF47[YE ORDER - <

to may enfmesment of administrative suhpuena, denial of; C1J 95't,31 NRC 1310990)

. QUA11[Y ASSURANCEspsdisohnity to plowedum poucessms and fuel fabricados facGitus; 13F9010,31 NRC 293 0990)

RADIATION DEnf!10Nin ena and weier,insis for,111F9410,31 NRC 293 0990)

y

RADLATION MONITORINO EQUIPMEhTcenpliance with emedan 2.1233(c); 13P 9410,11 NRC 293 (1990)

RADIOLDOICAL CONTINOINCY PLANS *

fa phmanian ymseeming and fuel fabecedan fastlity; Lilit9010,31 NRC 293 0900)REACTOR OPERA 1DR$

l quahnostias, request to reapon re:sud en; CII 90L3,31 NRC 219 (1990)RIACIVR VESSrJJ

poseumAemper':.;; L%its for, IEP404, 31 NRC 54 0990),

IllCON51DEPA110N'

af stay radene Ine of immedute effecdvanees af enfarament order, ISP#t,31 NRC 143 0990)REPERR',L OP RULJN05

by I',ensing bnerds, autharity far, ALAll 929,31 h1tC 2?l 0990)RiiOI 4AT10NS -

hDenges to; LinF90 4,31 NRC 54 0990)serpretaden of ''espect" in 10 CJ.R. 2.714; UlP 90-6,31 NRC 85 0990)

43

|'.

,

.. .

____

,

f

(-

r

Sl*JITT INDEXit-

hr

keessemanen of 10 CJJL 50d7(b1 C1J 942. 31 NRC 197 (1990)12

leerpssaeuen of 10 CJ3. Part 40, Appenda A. Cruence l; IJIPM9. 31 NRC l$0 (1990) ,"'

p''o, - oneehads of eenglanas wuh; 12PW4. 31 NRC 54 (1990)welwr of; CUW2. 31 NRC 197 (1990)

RLMANDi

fin affect en beenes eushariuuari; ClJM3,31 NRC 219 (IMO)

I' ' REOttNING A RHCORD. epphceWan of fiv>feew tem far semisake d law 41ed earaenums to anntim for. IDPWI,31 NRC

'

s ', 19 (1990)

| i en openiar quahncenes dunng lawtower teaung; C1J#3,31 NRC 219 (1990)4

[- standasd far grera af untirnely innnan far; ALAll-927,31 NRC 137 (1990)suedesde fer.13P#1,31 NRC 19 (1990)

)-- See anse Manass to Reopen-

,

i RI''ORTINO k!!QUIREMINI'8Jy

1 O; for transfer af feelhty ownenhip; LBP@7,31 NRC 116 (1990)RLYIEW< ,

has lar dem Effecnnnsee Renew'

REVIEW, APPIEJATBeiendoses ef; ALAB 926. 31 NitC 1 (1990)i

weeks given to beensing tuned fmdings; AIAll-926,31 NRC 1 (1990).

' RU12MAKINOS, ,' . Imma far, CLJW2, St NRC 197 (1990)

H ' rut 38 OF PRAC11CE"i of earmenne ensartiris esed for 135 far emetruonnn toned secepiure amendment;

1&P904,31 NRC 45 (1990)appet! board suonrity to renew refwnd ruhnsa; A1AB 929,31 NRC 271 (1990)appeal board siendesd far evenurning a liaroung baanre fadinant A1All-926,31 NRC 1 (1990)s

burden of gedag farwese to support caraenuan oppining banno or sinendmera; A1AB-926,31 NRC 1

(IMO)i: beden en movent far suy; ALAB428. 31 NRC 263 (1990)~

burden en opponent of sununary dupeeinen; IJIPM4. St NRC $4 (1990)obstlences to Cenemissian soeuleuena; ClJM2,3l NRC 197 (1990h 12PM4,31 NRC $4 (1990)

,oriseria for sisy of esency easant IDP48,31 NRC 143 (1990) *

'4 ' ; funds; QJM3,31 NkC 219 (1990) .emessency planning standards far twense authorisatian; ClJW3,31 NRC 219 (1990)

' Federal R eister pubbasuem as estaciens nunce tw purpass of hmely inuevennon; LSPMS,31 NRC'4

73 (1990)4

beenna seguisesmems for snatorials lisenses; A1AB429,31 NRC 271 (1990)knmedians effestivenes soview, purpass ef; QJM3, St NRC 219 (1990)hasseen seguirenesas of 10 CJD.1714;12P.904. 31 NRC 85 (1990)

,1 ~ leis beervennan, pond eeuse far; 13PMS,31 NitC 73 (1990)-

.

- liennes autherisation pending carglene of semand proceedes; CLJ-ta3. 31 NRC 219 (1990)s

htisebuity of sisenneera hassede eensidennen denenninauen; 131N946. St NRC 85 (1990)enendenary sehet, siendard for asens ef; C1J 903,31 NRC 219 (1990)

d semiene to strike in informal ; 7: 13P-90-10,31 NRC 293 (1990); 13P 90 ll: 31 NRC $20

(1990)smukiple board psoceedmps, pendency of seopening maim before sus board as escuse far untimely

Ahng of snanen to snopen befan the inhar bostd; A1AB-927,31 NRC 137 (1990)'

, , 1

. setord suppet seguired in oppsbau tuiefs; A1AB-926,31 NRC 1 (1990)',

. a' settlemera agvoaments; 13ft9010,31 NRC 293 (1990)'- siendants far sempening a secord; A1AD-927,31 NRC 137 (1990)

sunding to lmervens in decommineianing proceedms; IDPM3,31 NRC 40 (1990)standing to interventi in operene,g beense amendmera paceeding; 12P 904,31 NRC 15 (1990)

s'

A,7 +

m2| k-f |

&>

[ ; '

,

,

..

a'.2

- q

SUBJECT INDEX'~

L. ,

. .

IS *t

[ suy pen &ng appe.1, A1AB-928,31 NRC 30 09@ CJMS,31 NRC 219 (1990)senmary danshim, guryse of; 13P 904, St NRC Se PD90)' '

wolver of improperly tmafed issues; A1 AB 936,31 MRC 1 OM, [

weight given to lWng tuned fmdmgs 1.y appeal boards; ALAB 924 St NRC 10990)$ CIT 1J: MENT AGREEMIATS

restriction of ernployee's stabty to sopat esfory e<mcorns; 03 941,31 NRC 1310990). StillTI~RLNO

I fa beach pryuleums, need int canaideratian of, in emurgency plantes; QJM3,31 NRC 219 0900)SilOW CAUSE PROCEEDLNOS

sundard far Insenamn of; DDM1, St NRC 327 (199?)6

$0VIREION IMMUNTTYwelwe of. AIAB-929,31 NRC 2710990) ,

t - SITCLA1, ASSITIAhT ,|

fJ nn informal praaneang, disqualikiim of; ISPMS,31 NRC 40 0990) ,

$PBCLAL l'AC11IrlESf' emairwetian in en emergency; C1J#3,31 NRC 219 (1990) .!

APliCIAL NUClJAR MA11iRIA13licensee guh6astians to handle;1R''#10, St NRC 293 0990)'.

posessairm in form d omnemineuan; 1 RPM 10,31 NRC 293 (1990s,

$ltCIAl NIIDS IOPULA110NSideruificotion of; Cil#3,31 NRC 219 0990);

.'

$TANDING TD IVIEIM.NE''

ahrtreet coruerns or acadende irnerest as basis fir, IEPWA 31 NRC 13 (1990)in decommissundng prweedms; 12PM3, SI NRC 40 0990)in epersung bronse amenensra 3; ISP-904,31 NRC 13 (1990) ,

r ---.,

STAltsstanding to iruarvens; laPM6,31 NRC 85 0990)

STAYSburden af pursuasian m eruwers far, A1AB 928,31 NRC 263 0990)eriieria far grant of;IAP#8,31 NRC 143 0990)triepershle ardury comierd, QJ#3,31 NRC 219 (1990) '

genderne bu af immeduw effecoveness d enforcemens order, recensidernum of; ISP#1,31 hitC14.4 0 990) ,

'pe=&ng oppsal; QJM3,31 NRC 219 0990)

SUBPOI.NASadminierstive, enforcement of; ClJ#1, Si NRC 1310990) ;

$UMMARY DISPOSfrION !i

burden en apponers of; ISP 904,31 NRC $4 0990)purptmo di 1EP 904,31 NRC 54 0990)

. SUSPINSION OF IJCENSE .

bearing requirensnu for. AIAB-929,31 NRC 2710990)!' TiftlNICAL SitOFICA110NS >

>' . ' change in pressureAemperature limits; 13P-904,31 NRC 54 0990).; 'ITh0'aiRA!URE ~

tim nil duedlity transitim; ISP 904,31 NRC 54 (1990)TESTS

Cherry V nauh, for foeture taughness; 128A944,31 NRC 54 (1890),

TilORIUM bullTA11JNOS'!

F . disposal in engineered espusal cell; A1AB 928,31 NRC 263 0990); 12PM9,31 NRC 150 0990)11tANSPOltTA110N SERVICES'g.

. emergency, indentifkstian of individuals needing; C1JMS,31 NRC 219 0990)l.

<

u f f

i ds .

!

<

.

y' !

-!

O E

i,T ;

'1~,

'( \| --

~ ,. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

- , g ., -,. '1

M; ; 4 __

'

,,

s i, ;,

1 g ['' '3_3,

.

_

. . . . .,G( + j,

;

'! SUl4ECT INDEX . |,

J s

!

.ji,

i.'

^ j, wAgygg .

of ades er esplaisens; CLJ#2. 31 NkC 197 (19M)r

L. _of semesap insemahy, eenewuspen d liquel Auees to Jussise Aes fw; A1AB 929. 31 NRC 271

,

.

(1990)-r:; Wasts InsposAL

i 'U- , evepeense by fossed hessing of see6dess genereted seier et TMI-2, A1AB 9E 31 NRC 1 (1990) - .,

!

[.,~ of therian snel innaip in enginessed dispest cell; ALAB-928, $1 NRC 363 (1990); laPM9,31 . , ''<

Nhc 150 (1990) , ,

. WA111A -

esademW st TMI 2 de d; A1AlWM St NRC 1 (1990)l4,

,

"- see also pseendeeiert

1 MusTIAB1DWEks Isessissis assiest DD#1,31 NRC 327 (1990) t

,WRrr OF MADAMUS

siendesd for psent ef; C1JM3. 31 NRC 219 (1990) {

n- |, . ,.. a,v

fi!,

,

t

i

e: |

fa

5F

?'

|:. n. >

4-

%.

> , ,

y

tf e -)'

.

t

f

k

in.

*>

s i

$

iIe

+

,.

L

?

-

.('* '

tM |

1

n ' b- ,,

}J. 8

a.

ia

f

-h .

.,

.s

{h

't-

,t't

| |',!

i, .

, - ,, .

> >

.>>

b ,'?

-- [#

[-.. ;f ' =. - - . . ,

,1,

_______ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ -_

i

FACILITY INDI:X

lilOOMstll*O stri: DIUN! AMINATION, lkda Nun El0 05980, 030 05951, Om05952, 0408 335,0,40k444

1.NIORO MLhT ACI10N, January 19, 1990. OkDLR (Denymg Wuans to Darnas NRC Ordersissued March 16, 1989, and August 21, 1989, fm lad of Jurudwuan), IJIP 90 7, 31 NEC 116(1990)

INK)RCLMENT ACI'lON, lehruary 8,1990, ORDI:R, WIP 93 4, 31 NRC 143 (1990)ONI I ACIORY RO%, OI.NEVA, Oil 44Ml; Dadet No MIM55.SP

&M11A1. PROD:l;DINO, March 30, 1990, DIICISION, A1.AD 929,31 NkC 271 (1990)PAllti'INDLR A1DMIC MANT, Druaat No. 34050M MLA

MATERIA 1A UQ:N51' AMl;NDMINT; January 10, 1990. MI:MOR ANDUM AND ORDI R(Request for llaarmgl, IJIP-m 3, 31 NRC 40 (19W)

ROCKl'11)YNI DIVISION, thuket No. 7425MA1T.RLA13 UCI.N51. AMENDMINT; Man:h 19, 1990 Ml:MORANDUM AND ORDi* (M<ne

w Birae) WIP-9010,31 NkC 293 (1990)O*,1LKIALA IJCEN51. AMENDMINT; Mash 30, 1990, MIM)RANDUM AND ORDI,k

(Reemsideraum llamenwneu and 1APSR), LJIP 9411, 31 NRC 320 (1990)SLABROOK ST ATION, Uruu I and 2 Ducket Nas $4443411. S4444 01.

OPl*ATING IJCI'.N5fi, January 8,1990. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rulms m InterveneWimns to Admit a imRied Cuniendan and Roopen the Recent Based upon Ow Wuhdiewal ofthe Maasechusette 1.14 b. Netwurt and WCOY); LJIP 901, 31 NRC 19 (19H))

OP!AATINO UCEN511; Janwy 9,1990 MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Denymg Imervenars'Ramn in koopen kmmed Repedmg Propneed Amendmani ie Operaung laense App <suan),IJIP 902, 31 NRC 38 (1990)

OPIRA11NO IJCIW5L, Tehruary 26, 1990, MEMORANDUM _ AND ORDik, AIAI) 927, 31 NRC137 (1990)

OP11A11NO UCl,NSL, March 1,1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR, Clj 90 2, 31 NRC 197(1990), Clj 943, 31 NRC 219 (1990)

So1Tril11;XA5 PRQiliCT, Umu I and 2, Ikda Naa 54448, $0 449IWlORCl.MFNT ACf10N, f ebruary 8,1990 ORDLk, CLJ 941, 31 NRC 131 (1990)

Tilkil M111 ISLAND NUClJ.AR STATKM, unti 2. Dacket No 54324GLAOPIRATING UCF.NSl; AMENDMINT; January 19,1990, DECl$10N, Al.AB 926, 31 NRC 1

(1990)"IURK!'Y bXhi NUCILAR OLNF,RA11NO MART, Unus 3 and 4,1% des Nos $4 250, 542.11

kliOUEST M)R ACTION, Manh 22, 1990, DIRECIUR'S DirtSION UNDI710 C.) R 2 206,DD 901, 31 NRC 327 0990)

TURKEY K)thi NUClJ.AR Of.NT.RA11NO PLAffT, Units 3 and 4 thdas Nos $4250 01A-4,50 251 CIA 4

OP! RATING LJCl;NSI AMENDMINT; January 16, 1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDt.R (Ruimge Mean far Summary thspAtuan and .hua61 of Pnweedmg), UtP.944, 31 NRC 54 (1990)

OPIRA11NO UCLNSE AMLNDMINT; January 16, 1990, MEMORANDUM AND ORDIS(Denymg ivuuan u, Intervens), WIP 945, 31 NRC 73 (1990)

47

|

|

. _ , - _ _ __

i, _i.-

,

,{'-

FACILITY INDI:X

j ' , ' .

VERMONT YANKBE NUQJAR Mr#1R STA110N. thdet No. $62714LA-4(44 RATING IJCENEE AMr.VDMEhi; 3enuary 26.1990. MI.MORANDlM AND OkDi'k (Rulms

a Nife fw 1mve to imenew VM by the $uw of Vermano. IJIP46. 31 NRC 45 (IWO)Wl3T ODCAGO RARE EAR'nts l'ACulrY;Ikda No 40M1-ML

MA111 RIALS IJGNSE AMENDMLhT; Iwouary 13. lWO, INTIMI. D0051CW (Ruhng en AllRanaines leauesh IJ6P49,31 NRC 150 (1990)

MATERIA 13 IJOWSE AMlWDMIAT; Manh 27, 1990; MEMORANDUM. A1AD 928,31 NkCaf4 (1990)

1 -

t

. -

M

.

|

<