Literaturverzeichnis - Springer Link

Literaturverzeichnis

Acito, F. (1977), An Investigation of some Data Collection Issues in Conjoint Measurement,

in: Greenberg, B.A./Bellenger, D.N. (Hrsg.), Contemporary Marketing Thought, Chi

cago 1977, S. 82-85.

Addelman, S. (1962a), Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Fractional Factorial Plans, in: Tech-

nometrics. Vol. 4, 1962, S. 47-58.

Addelman, S. (1962b), Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asynmietrical Factorial Experi

ments, in: Technometrics, Vol. 4, 1962, S. 21-46.

Adkins, L (1997), A Monte Carlo Study of a Generalized Maximum Entropy Estimator of the

Binary Choice Model, in: Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 12, 1997, S. 183-197.

Agarwal, M.K. (1988), A monte carlo study investigating configuration recovery in adaptive

conjoint analysis, in: Frazier, G.et al (Hrsg.), 1988 AMA Educators'Proceedings: Effi

ciency and effectiveness in marketing, Chicago, IL 1988, S. 292-296.

Agarwal, M.K. (1983), A monte carlo study of ties in configuration recovery using conjoint

analysis, in: Murphy, P.E.et al. (Hrsg.), 1983 AMA Educators' Proceedings, Chicago,

IL 1983, S. 447-451.

Agarwal, M.K./Green, P.E. (1991), Adaptive Conjoint Analysis versus Self Explicated Mod

els: Some Empirical Results, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 8,

1991, S. 141-146.

Ajzen, I. (1985), From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, in: Kuhl,

J./Beckmann, J. (Hrsg.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Berlin 1985, S.

11-39.

Akaah, I.P./Korgaonkar, P.K. (1983), An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of

Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint Models, in:

Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, 1983, S. 187-197.

Akaike, H. (1974), A New Look at Statistical Model Identification, in: IEEE Transactions on

Automatic Control, AC-19, 1974, S. 716-723.

Alters, S./Brockhoff, K. (1985), Die Giiltigkeit der Ergebnisse eines Testmarktsimulators bei

unterschiedlichen Daten und Auswertungsmethoden, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirt-

schaftliche Forschung, 37. Jg., H. 3, 1985, S. 191-217.

Albrecht, J. (2000), Praferenzstrukturmessung, Frankfurt a.M. 2000.

Allenby, G./Rossi, P.E. (1991), There Is No Aggregation Bias: Why Macro Logit Models

Work, in: Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 9, 1991, S. 1-14.

Allenby, G.M./Arora, N./Ginter, J.L. (1995), Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Analysis

of Conjoint Studies, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, 1995, S. 152-162.

Allenby, G.M./Arora, N./Ginter, J.L. (1998), On the Heterogeneity of Demand, in: Journal of

Marketing Research, Vol. 35, 1998, S. 384-389.

Allenby, G.M./Ginter, J.L. (1995), Using extremes to design products and segment markets,

in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1995, S. 392-403.

215

Allenby, G.M./Rossi, P.E. (1999), Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity, in: Journal of

Econometrics, Vol. 89, 1999, S. 57-78.

Allenby, G.M./Rossi, P.E. (2003), Perspectives Based on 10 Years of HB in Marketing Re

search, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim 2003.

Amemiya, T. (1981), Qualitative Response Models: A Survey, in: Journal of Economic Litera

ture, Vol. 21, 1981, S. 1483-1536.

Anderson, J.C. (1987), The Effect of Type of Representation on Judgements of New Product

Acceptance, in: Industrial Marketing and Purchasing, Vol. 2, 1987, S. 29-46.

Anderson, J.C./Donthu, N. (1988), A Proximate Assessment of the External Validity of Con

joint Analysis, in: Frazier, G. et al (Hrsg.), 1988 AMA Educators' Proceedings, Bd. 54,

Chicago 1988, S. 87-91.

Anderson, S.P. (1992), Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation, Cambridge, Mass.

1992.

Anderson, W.T./Cunningham, W.H. (1972), The socially conscious consumer, in: Journal of

Marketing, Vol. 36, 1972, S. 23-31.

Andrews, J./Durvasula, S. (1990), A Framework for Conzeptualizing and Measuring the In

volvement Construct in Advertising Research, in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 19, No.

4, 1990, S. 14-41.

Andrews, R.L./Ainslie, A./Currim, IS. (2002), An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice

Models with Discrete Versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity, in: Journal

of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, 2002, S. 479-487.

Andrews, R.L./Ansari, A./Currim, IS. (2002), Hierarchical Bayes versus Finite Mixture Con

joint Analysis Models: A Comparison of Fit, Prediction, and Partworth Recovery, in:

Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2002, S. 87-98.

Andrews, R.L/Currim, IS. (2003a), Retention of latent segments in regression-based market

ing models, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2003, S.

315-321.

Andrews, R.L/Currim, IS. (2003b), A Comparison of Segment Retention Criteria for Finite

Mixture Logit Models, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 40, 2003, S. 235-243.

Andrews, R.L./Manrai, A.K. (1998), Simulation experiments in choice simplification: The

effects of task and context on forecasting performance, in: Journal of Marketing Re

search, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1998, S. 198.

Andritzky, K. (1976), Die Operationalisierbarkeit von Theorien zum Konsumentenverhalten,

Berlin 1976.

Antil, J.H. (1984), Conceptualizing and Operationalization of Involvement, in: Advances in

Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 1984, S. 203-209.

Armstrong, A.G./Fildes, R. (1995), Correspondence On the Selection of Error Measures for

Comparisons Among Forecasting Methods, in: Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 14, 1995, S.

67-71.

Armstrong, J.S./Morwitz, V.G./Kumar, V. (2000), Sales Forecasts for Existing Consumer

216

Products and Services: Do Purchase Intentions Contribute to Accuracy?, 2000.

Arora, N./Allenby, G.M./Ginter, J.L. (1998), A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and sec

ondary demand, in: Marketing Science, 17, No.l, 1998, S. 29-44.

Arora, N./Huber, J. (2001), Improving Parameter Estimates and Model Prediction by Aggre

gate Customization in Choice Experiments, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28,

No. 2, 2001, S. 273-283.

Aschenbrenner, K.M. (1977), Komplexes Wahlverhalten: Entscheidungen zwischen multiatt-

ributen Altemativen, in: Hartmann, K.-D./Koeppler, K. (Hrsg.), Fortschritte der Markt-

psychologie, Bd. 1, Frankfurt a.M. 1977, S. 21-52.

Assael, H. (1998), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 6. Aufl., Boston u.a. 1998.

Aust, E. (1996), Simultane Conjointanalyse, Benefitsegmentierung, Produktlinien- und Preis-

gestaltung, Frankfurt a.M. 1996.

Axelrod, J.N. (1963), Induced Moods and Attitudes Toward Products, in: Journal of Advertis

ing Research, Vol. 3, 1963, S. 19-24.

Axhausen, K.W. (1996), Hinweise zur Messung von Praferenzstrukturen mit Methoden der

Stated Preferences, Koln 1996.

Backhaus, K. (2(X)3), Industriegiitermarketing, 7. Aufl., Miinchen 2003.

Backhaus, K./Brzoska, L. (2(X)3), Conjointanalytische Praferenzmessungen zur Prognose von

Preisreaktionen - Eine empirische Analyse der extemen Validitat, Miinster 2003.

Backhaus, K. et al (2003), Multivariate Analysemethoden, 10. Aufl., Berlin u.a. 2(X)3.

Backhaus, KJVoeth, M. (2003), Limit Conjoint Analysis, Miinster 2003.

Backhaus, K./Voeth, M./Hahn, C. (1998), Limit Conjoint-Analyse, Arbeitspapier Nr. 24 des

Betriebswirtschaftlichen Instituts fiir Anlagen und Systemtechnologien der Westfali-

schen Wilhelms-Universitat Munster, Miinster 1998.

Bagozzi, R.P./Warshaw, P.R. (1990), Trying to Consume, in: Journal of Consumer Research,

Vol. 17, 1990, S. 127-140.

Balderjahn, I. (1991), Ein Verfahren zur empirischen Bestimmung von Preisresponsefunktio-

nen, in: Marketing ZFP, H. 1, 1991, S. 33-42.

Balderjahn, I. (1993), Marktreaktionen von Konsumenten, Berlin 1993.

Balderjahn, I. (1994), Der Einsatz der Conjoint-Analyse zur empirischen Bestinmiung von

Preisresponsefunktionen, in: Marketing ZFP, H. 1, 1994, S. 12-20.

Balderjahn, I. (1998), Empirical Analysis of Price Response Functions, in: Balderjahn,

I./Mennicken, C./Vernette, E. (Hrsg.), New Developments and Approaches in Consumer

Behaviour Research, Stuttgart u.a. 1998, S. 185-200.

Bamberg, G./Baur, F. (2002), Statistik, 12. Aufl., Munchen, Wien 2002.

Bansch, A. (2002), Kauferverhalten, 8. Aufl., Munchen u.a. 2002.

Bass, A.R./Firestone, I. J. (1980), Implications of Representativeness for Field and Laboratory

Research Findings, in: American Psychologist, Vol. 35, 1980, S. 463-464.

217

Bateson, J.E.G./Reibstein, D.J./Boulding, W. (1987), Conjoint Analysis Reliability and Valid

ity: A Framework for Future Research, in: Houston, MJ. (Hrsg.), Review of Marketing,

Chicago 1987,8.451-481.

Batsell, R.R. (1982), On Utility, Substitutability and the Prediction of Choice: A Simple Ex

tension of the Luce Model which Simultaneously Scales Utility and Substitutability.

Choice Models for Buyer Behavior, in: Research in Marketing, Supplement 1, 1982, S.

243-258.

Batsell, R.R./Louviere, J.J. (1991), Experimental Analysis of Choice, in: Marketing Letters,

No. 3, 1991, S. 199-214.

Bauer, H.H. (1989), Marktabgrenzung: Konzeption und Problematik von Ansatzen und Me-

thoden zur Abgrenzung und Strukturierung von Markten unter besonderer Beriicksichti-

gung von marketingtheoretischen Verfahren, Berlin 1989.

Bauer, H.H./Herrmann, A./Mengen, A. (1995), Conjoint+Cost: Nicht Marktanteile, sondem

Gewinne maximieren!, in: Controlling, No. 6, 1995, S. 339-345.

Baumgarten, H./Zadek, H./Kieffer, D. (2004), Im Spiegelbild des Marktes, in: Logistik heute,

Vol. 26, 5, 2004, S. 58 - 59.

Belk, R.W. (1985), Issues in the Intention-Behavior Discrepancy, in: Research in Consumer

Behavior, Vol. 1, 1985, S. 1-34.

Bemmaor, A.C. (1995), Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures: The parametric

case, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1995, S. 176-191.

Ben Zur, H./Breznitz, S.J. (1981), The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior, in:

Acta Psychologica, Vol. 47, 1981, S. 89-104.

Ben-Akiva, M. (1994), Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences Data, in: Marketing Let

ters, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1994, S. 335-350.

Ben-Akiva, M./Boccara, N. (1995), Discrete choice models with latent choice sets, in: Interna

tional Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, 1995, S. 9-24.

Ben-Akiva, M./Lerman, S.R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to

Travel Demand, 2. Aufl., Cambridge 1985.

Ben-Akiva, M. et al (1997), Modeling Methods for Discrete Choice Analysis, in: Marketing

Letters, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1997, S. 273-286.

Berekoven, L./Eckert, W./Ellenrieder, P. (2001), Marktforschung, 9. Aufl., Wiesbaden 2001.

Berger, J.O. (1980), Statistical Decision Theory, Foundations, Concepts, and Methods, New

York 1980.

Berkowitz, L./Donnerstein, E. (1982), External Validity Is More Than Skin Deep: Some An

swers to Criticisms of Laboratory Experiments, in: American Psychologist, Vol. 37,

1982, S. 245-257.

Berndt, R. (1992), Strukturmodelle des Kauferverhaltens, in: Der Betriebswirt, H. 1, 1992, S.

24-29.

Bettman, JR. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Reading, MA

1979.

218

Bettman, J.R./Johnson, EJ./Payne, J.W. (1991), Consumer Decision Making, in: Robertson,

T.S., Kassarjian, H.H. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior, Englewood Cliffs,

NewJersey 1991,8.50-84.

Bettman, J.R./Luce, M.F./Payne, J.W. (1998), Constructive Consumer Choice Processes, in:

Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25, 1998, S. 187-217.

Bettman, J.R./Zins, M.A. (1977), Constructive Processes in Consumer Choice, in: Journal of

Consumer Research, Vol. 4, 1977, S. 75-85.

Biggs, S.F. et al. (1985), The effects of task size and similarity on the decision behavior of

bank loan officers, in: Management Science, Vol. 31, 1985, S. 970-987.

Billings, R.S./Marcus, S.A. (1983), Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models

of decision behavior: process tracing versus policy capturing, in: Organizational Behav

ior and Human Performance, Vol. 31, 1983, S. 331-352.

Bilstein, F.F./Bieker, K.J. (2000), Die erste richtige Nachfragekurve in der Marktforschung,

in: absatzwirtschaft, H. 11, 2000, S. 62-68.

Bishop, CM. (1995), Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford 1995.

Bishop, R.C./Heherlein, T.A. (1979), Measuring Values of Extra Market Goods: Are Indirect

Measures Biased?, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 61, 1979, S.

926-930.

Bishop, R.C./Heberlein, T.A./Kealy, M.J. (1983), Contingent Valuation of Environmental As

sets: Comparisons with a Simulated Market, in: Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 23,

1983, S. 619-634.

Blackwell, R.D./Miniard, P. W./Engel, J.F. (2001), Consumer behavior, 9. Aufl., 2001. Bleymuller, J./Gehlert, G./Gulicher, H. (2002), Statistik fiir Wirtschaftswissenschaftler, 12.

Aufl., Munchen 2002.

Bliemel, F./Laroche, M. (1985), Consumer Brand Categorization and Price-Quality Evalua

tion. Working Paper 83-3-R, School of Business, Queen's University Kingston, Ontario,

Kanada 1985.

Block, H.D./Marschak, J. (1960), Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Response, in:

Olkin, I. (Hrsg.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Stanford 1960, S. 97-132.

Bockenholt, U./Dillon, W.R. (2000), Inferring latent brand dependencies, in: Journal of Mar

keting Research, Vol. 37, 2000, S. 72-87.

Bocker, F. (1986), Praferenzforschung als Mittel marktorientierter Untemehmensfiihrung, in:

Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 38. Jg., H. 7/8, 1986, S. 543-574.

Bocker, F. (1987), Die Bildung von Praferenzen fiir langlebige Konsumguter in Familien, in:

Marketing ZFP, 9. Jg., H. 1, 1987, S. 16-24.

Bocker, F./Schweikl, H. (1988), Better Preference Prediction with Individualized Sets of

Relevant Attributes, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 5, 1988, S.

15-24.

Bohler, H. (1992), Marktforschung, Stuttgart u.a.O. 1992.

219

Bohm, P. (1994), Behaviour under Uncertainty without Preference Reversal: A Field Experi

ment, in: Hey, J.D. (Hrsg.), Experimental Economics, Berlin u.a. 1994, S. 5-19.

Borg, L/Staufenbiel, T. (1997), Theorien und Methoden der Skalierung: Eine Einftihrung, 3.

Aufl., Bern u.a.O. 1997.

Borsch-Supan, A. (1987), Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice, Berlin, Heidelberg 1987.

Bortz, J. (1999), Statistik fiir Sozialwissenschaftler, Berlin u.a.O. 1999.

Botelho, A./Costa Pinto, L (2002), Hypothetical, real, and predicted real willingness to pay in

open-ended surveys: experimental results, in: Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 9, 2(X)2,

S. 993-996.

Box, G.E.P. (1954), Some Theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of

variance problems. II. Effects of inequality of variances and of correlation between er

rors in the two-way classification, in: Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 25, 1954,

S. 484-498.

Bozdogan, H. (1987), Model Selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The Gen

eral Theory and its Analytical Extensions, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 52, 1987, S. 345-370.

Bradley, R.A./Terry, M.E. (1952), Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: The Method

of Paired Comparisons, in: Biometrika, Vol. 39, 1952, S. 324-345.

Bradlow, E.T. et al. (o.A.), When BDT in Marketing meant Bayesian Decision Theory;

Online im Internet: <http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/ideas/pdf/Alderson/Influ-

ence%20of%20Greens%20Research.pdf> (Angefragt am 20.01.04).

Bretton-Clark (l9S9)y Conjoint Linmap. User manual, Morristown, NJ 1989.

Brisoux, J.E./Laroche, M. (1980), A Proposed Consumer Strategy of Simplification for Cate

gorizing Brands, in: Summey, J.D./Taylor, R.D. (Hrsg.), Evolving Marketing Thoughts

for 1980. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Marketing Association,

Carbandale 1980, S. 112-114.

Brockhoff, K. (1999), Produktpolitik, Stuttgart 1999.

Brookshire, D.S./Coursey, D.L/Schulze, W.D. (1987), The external validity of experimental

economics techniques: analysis of demand behavior, in: Economic inquiry. Vol. 25,

April, 1987, S. 239 - 250.

Brunswik, E. (1952), The Conceptual Framework of Psychology, Chicago 1952.

Brzoska, L (2(X)3), Die Conjoint-Analyse als Instrument zur Prognose von Preisreaktionen -

Eine theoretische und empirische Beurteilung der extemen Validitat, Hamburg 2003.

Buchtele, F./Holzmiiller, H.H. (1990), Die Bedeutung der Umweltvertraglichkeit von Produk-

ten fiir die Kaufpraferenz: Ergebnisse einer Conjoint-Analyse bei Holzschutzmitteln, in:

Jahrbuch der Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, 36. Jg., Nr. 1, 1990, S. 86-102.

Buckley, P.G. (1988), Nested Multinomial Logit Analysis of Scanner Data for a Hierarchical

Choice Model, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1988, S. 133-154.

Bunch, D.S./Batsell, R.R. (1989), A Monte Carlo Comparison of Estimators for the Multino

mial Logit Model, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26, 1989, S. 56-68.

Buschken, J. (1994a), Multipersonale Kaufentscheidungen: empirische Analyse zur Operatio-

220

nalisierung von Einflussbeziehungen im Buying Center, Wiesbaden 1994.

Buschken, J. (1994b), Conjoint-Analyse, in: Tomczak, T./Reinecke, S. (Hrsg.), Thexis, Markt-

forschung, St. Gallen 1994, S. 72-89.

Calder, BJJPhillips, LWJTybout, A.M. (1981), Designing Research for Application, in:


Campbell, J.P. (1976), Psychometric theory, in: Dunnette, M.D.H. (Hrsg.), Handbook of in

dustrial and organizational psychology, Chicago 1976, S. 185-222.

Cardell, S./Dunbar, F. (1980), Measuring the Societal Impacts of Automobil Downsizing, in:

Journal of Transportation Research A, Vol. 14, 1980, S. 423-434.

Carlin, B.P./Chib, S. (1995), Baysian Model Choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods,

in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 54, 1995, S. 473-484.

Carmines, E.G./Zeller, R.A. (1987), Reliability and Validity Assessment, 9. Aufl., Beverly

Hills 1987.

Carmone, F.J./Green, P.E. (1981), Model Misspecification in Multiattribute Parameter Esti

mation, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, S. 87-93.

Carmone, F.J./Green, P.E./Jain, A.K. (1978), Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monte

Carlo Results, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, 1978, S. 300-303.

Carroll, J.D. (1972), Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Ap

plications, in: Shepard, R.N./Romney, A.K./Nerlove, S.B. (Hrsg.), Multidimensional Scaling, New York, London 1972, S. 105-155.

Carroll, J.D./Green, P.E. (1995), Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Con

joint Analysis, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1995, S. 385-391.

Carson, R.T. et al. (1994), Experimental Analysis of Choice, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 5,

No. 4, 1994, S. 351-368.

Casella, G./George, E.I. (1992), Explaining the Gibbs Sampler, in: The American Statistician,

Vol. 46, No. 3, 1992, S. 167-174.

Cattin, P./Punj, G (1984), Factors Influencing the Selection of Preference Model Form for

Continuous Utility Functions in Conjoint Analysis, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 3, No. 1,

1984, S. 73-82.

Cattin, P./Weinberger, M.G (1980), Some Validity and Reliability Issues in the Measurement

of Attribute Utilities, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, 1980, S. 780-783.

Cattin, P./Wittink, D.R. (1982), Conmiercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey, in: Journal

of Marketing, Vol. 46, 1982, S. 44-53.

Celsi, R.L./Olson, J.C. (1988), The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension

Processes, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, 1988, S. 210-224.

Chakraborty, G et al. (2002), The ability of ratings and choice conjoint to predict market

shares, A Monte Carlo Simulation, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, 2002, S.

237-249.

221

Chapman, R.G./Bolton, R.N. (1985), Attribute Presentation Order Bias and Nonstationarity in

Full Profile Conjoint Analysis Tasks, in: Lusch, R.F.et al. (Hrsg.), 1985 AMA Educa

tors' Proceedings, Report No. 51, Chicago, IL 1985, S. 373-379.

Chapman, R.G./Staelin, R. (1982), Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data Within the Sto

chastic Utility Model, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, 1982, S. 288-301.

Chib, S./Greenberg, E. (1995), Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm, in: The

American Statistician, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1995, S. 327-335.

Chib, S./Greenberg, E. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods in Economet

rics, in: Econometric Theory, Vol. 12, 1996, S. 409-431.

Chib, S./Jeliazkov, I. (2001), Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis-Hastings Output, in:

Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 96, No. 453, 2001, S. 270-281.

Choi, S.C/DeSarbo, W.S. (1994), A Conjoint-based Product Designing Procedure Incorporat

ing Price Competition, in: Joumal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11, 1994, S.

451-459.

Chrzan, K./Orme, B.K. (2000), An Overview and Comparison of Design Strategies for

Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim

2000.

Churchill, G.A.J. (1979), A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Con

structs, in: Joumal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, 1979, S. 64-73.

Cohen, S.H. (1997), Perfect Union: CBCA marries the best of conjoint and discrete choice

models, in: Marketing Research, Vol. 9, 1997, S. 12-17.

Cohen, S.H./Ramaswamy, V. (1998), Latent Segmentation Models: New tools assist research

ers in market segmentation, in: Marketing Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1998, S. 15-21.

Conlon, B./Dellaert, B.G.C/van Soest, A. (2000), Combining and Comparing Consumers'

Stated Preference Ratings and Choice Responses, Tilburg 2000.

Conrad, T. (1997), Preisbildung mittels der Conjoint-Analyse und eines Simulationsmodells

am Beispiel eines Premiumanbieters der Automobilindustrie, Tubingen 1997.

Cook, T.D./Campbell, D.T. (1979), Quasi-Experimentation. Design & Analysis Issues for

Field Settings, Chicago 1979.

Corsten, H./Meier, B. (1982), Konsumentenverhalten in unterschiedlichen Kaufsituationen -

Entwurf eines Modells auf verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Grundlage, in: Jahrbuch der

Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, 28. Jg., 1982, S. 112-136.

Corstjens, M.L./Gautschi, D.A. (1983), Formal Choice Models In Marketing, in: Marketing

Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1983, S. 19-56.

Costanzo, CM. et al. (1982), An Alternative Method for Assessing Goodness-of-Fit for Logit

Models, in: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 14, 1982, S. 963-971.

Costley, CL (1988), Meta Analysis of Involvement Research, in: Advances in Consumer

Research, Vol. 15, 1988, S. 554-562.

Cote, J.A./Buckley, M.R. (1987), Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing

across 70 construct validation studies, in: Joumal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, 1987,

222

S. 315-318.

Cowles, M.K./Carlin, B.P. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence: A Comparative

Review, in: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, 1996, S. 883-904.

Cummings, R.G. et al (1997), Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?, in: Journal

of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 3, 1997, S. 609-621.

Cummings, R.G./Harrison, G.W./Rutstrom, E.E. (1995), Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?, in: American

Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 1, 1995, S. 260-266.

Currim, IS. (1981), Using segmentation approaches for better prediction and understanding

from consumer mode choice models, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3,

1981, S. 301-309.

Currim, LS./Weinberg, CB./Wittink, D.R. (1981), The Design of Subscription Programs for a

Performing Arts Series, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1981, S. 67-

75.

Curry, J. (1997), After the Basics: Keeping Key Issues in Mind makes Conjoint Analysis eas

ier to apply, in: Marketing Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1997, S. 6-11.

Cutler, A./Windham, M.P. (1994), Information-based validity functionals for mixture analysis,

in: Proceedings of the first US/Japan Conference on Frontiers of statistical modeling: An

informational approach, Boston 1994, S. 149-170.

Dahlhoff, H.-D. (1980), Kaufentscheidungsprozesse von Familien, Frankfurt a.M. 1980.

Day, G.S. (1972), Evaluating Models of Attitude Structure, in: Journal of Marketing Re-

serach. Vol. 9, August, 1972, S. 279 - 286.

Debreu, G (1960), A Review of Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis, in:

American Economic Review, Vol 50, 1960, S. 186-188.

Decker, R. (1994), Analyse und Simulation des Kaufverhaltens auf Konsumgiitermarkten,

Frankfurt a.M. u.a. 1994.

Deimel, K. (1989), Grundlagen des Involvement und Anwendung im Marketing, in: Marke

ting ZFP, H. 3, 1989, S. 153-161.

Dellaert, B.GC/Brazell, J.D./Louviere, J J. (1999), The Effect of Attribute Variation on Con

sumer Choice Consistency, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, S. 139-147.

DeSarbo, W.S./Ramaswamy, V./Cohen, S.H. (1995), Market Segmentation with Choice-Based

Conjoint Analysis, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, S. 137-147.

DeSarbo, W.S./Wedel, M./Vriens, M. (1992), Latent Class Metric Conjoint Analysis, in: Mar

keting Letters, Vol. 3, 1992, S. 273-288.

Dhar, R. (1997), Consumer Preference for a No-Choice option, in: Journal of Consumer Re

search, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1997, S. 215-231.

Dhar, R./Glazer, R. (1996), Similarity in Context: Cognitive Representation and Violation of

Preference and Perceptual Invariance in Consumer Choice, in: Organizational Behavior

and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67, No. 3, 1996, S. 280 - 293.

223

Dhar, RJNowlis, S.MJSherman, SJ. (2000), Trying Hard or Hardly Trying: An Analysis of

Context Effects in Choice, in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2000, S.

189-200.

Dichtl, E./Miiller, S. (1986), Anspruchsinflation und Nivellierungstendenz als mefitechnische

Probleme in der Absatzforschung, in: Marketing ZFP, 8. Jg., H. 4, 1986, S. 233-236.

Dillon, W.RJKumar, A. (1994), Latent Structure and Other Finite Mixture Models in Market

ing: An Integrative Survey and Overview, in: Bagozzi, R.P. (Hrsg.), Advanced Methods

of marketing Research, Cambridge 1994, S. 295-351.

Domencich, T./McFadden, D. (1975), Urban Travel Demand, Amsterdam 1975.

Domzal, T.J./Unger, LS. (1985), Judgements of Verbal versus Pictorial Presentations of a

Product with Functional and Aesthetic Features, in: Advances in Consumer Research,

Vol. 12, 1985, S. 268-272.

Dube, J.-P. et al (2002), Structural Applications of the Discrete Choice Model, in: Marketing

Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, S. 207-220.

Ebbesen, E.B./Konecni, V.J. (1980), On the External Validity of Decision-Making Research:

What Do We Know About Decisions in the Real World?, in: Wallsten, T.S. (Hrsg.),

Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior, Hillsdale, NJ 1980, S. 21-45.

Ebel, B./Lauszus, D. (2000), Preisabsatzfunktionen, in: Herrmann, A./Homburg, C. (Hrsg.),

Marktforschung: Methoden, Anwendungen, Praxisbeispiele, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden 2000,

S. 835-859.

Eggenberger, C./Hauser, C. (1996), Conjoint Measurement zur Gestaltung von intemationa-

len Telefondienstleistungen, in: zfbf, 48. Jg., Heft 9, 1996, S. 841-859.

Eisele, J./Kreusel, J. (1997), Conjoint Measurement: Wettbewerbsvorteile durch effiziente

Marktforschung, in: absatzwirtschaft. Vol. 40, 1997, S. 56-58.

Eliason, S.R. (1993), Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Logic and Practice, New Park, CA

u.a. 1993.

Elrod, T./Haubl, G. (1997), An Extended Random Coefficients Model, With Application to

Metric Conjoint Analysis; Online im Internet:

<http://www.bus.ualberta.ca/telrod/ercm-c.pdf> (Abfrage am: 25.11.2004).

Elrod, T./Kumar, S.K. (1989), Bias in the First Choice Rule for Predicting Share, in: Mete-

grano, M. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Gaining a com

petitive advantage through PC-based interviewing and analysis, Ketchum 1989, S. 259-

271.

Elrod, T./Louviere, J.J./Davey, K.S. (1992), An Empirical Comparison of Ratings-Based and

Choice-Based Conjoint Models, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, 1992, S.

368-377.

Engel, J.F./Kollat, D.T./Blackwell, R.D. (1968), Consumer Behavior, New York u.a. 1968.

Erdem, T./Winer, R.S. (2002), Introduction to the Special Issue on Choice Modelling, in:

Marketing Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, S. 157-162.

Ernst, O./Sattler, H. (2000), Multimediale versus traditionelle Conjoint-Analysen, in: Marke-

224

ting ZFP, H. 2, 2000, S. 161-172.

Eversheim, W./Schmidt, RJSartez, B. (1994), Systematische Ableitung von Produktmerkma-

len aus Marktbedurfnissen, in: io Management Zeitschrift, Vol. 63, 1994, S. 66-70.

Felten, C. (2002), Prospect Theorie und Marketing, in: Zeitschrift fiir Betriebswirtschaft, Er-

ganzungsheft 1/2002, S. 67-86.

Ferber, R. (1977), Research by convenience, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4, 1977,

S. 57-58.

Fischer, J. (2001), Individualisierte Praferenzanalyse, Wiesbaden 2001.

Fok, D./Frarises, P.H. (2001), Forecasting market shares from models for sales, in: Interna

tional Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 17, 2001, S. 121-128.

Frantzke, A. (1989), Die Automobilnachfrage der privaten Haushalte in der Bundesrepublik

Deutschland. Eine theoretische und empirische Studie auf Basis eines diskreten Ent-

scheidungsmodells, Frankfurt am Main 1989.

Fricke, R. (1974), Kriteriumsorientierte Leistungsmessung, Stuttgart 1974.

Frykblom, P. (1997), Hypothetical Question Modes and Real Willingness to Pay, in: Journal

of Environmental Economics & Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1997, S. 275-287.

Gaeth, GJ./Shanteau, J. (1984), Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experi

enced decision makers, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 33,

1984, S. 263-282.

Gedenk, K. (2002), Verkaufsforderung, Munchen 2002.

Gelman, A. et al. (1995), Baysian Data Analysis, London u.a. 1995.

Gelman, A. et al (2000), Baysian Data Analysis, London u.a. 2000.

Gemiinden, KG. (1985), Perceived Risk and Information Search: A Systematic Metaanalysis

of the Empirical Evidence, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, No. 2,

1985, S. 75-100.

Gensch, D.H./Javalgi, R.G. (1987), The Influence of Involvement on Disaggregate Attribute

Choice Models, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, June, 1987, S. 71-82.

Gensch, D.H./Recker, W.W. (1979), The Multinomial, Multiattribute Logit Choice Model, in:


Gensch, D.H./Soofi, E.S. (1995), Information-theoretic estimation of individual consideration

set, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1995, S. 25-38.

Gensler, S. (2003), Heterogenitat in der Praferenzanalyse: Ein Vergleich von hierarchischen

Bayes-Modellen und Finite-Mixture-Modellen, Wiesbaden 2003.

Gerhard, A. (1995), Die Unsicherheit des Konsumenten bei der Kaufentscheidung, Wiesba

den 1995.

Gerke, W./Pfeufer-Kinnel, G. (1996), Preispolitik im Zahlungsverkehr, in: Marktforschung

und Management, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1996, S. 59-64.

Gierl, H. (1987), Von der Praferenz zum Kauf eines Markenartikels, in: Markenartikel, No.

10, 1987, S. 458-467.

225

Gierl, H./Helm, R./Stumpp, S. (2001), Wertfunktion der Prospect-Theorie, Produktpraferenzen

und Folgerungen fiir das Marketing, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche For-

schung, Vol. 53, 2001, S. 559-588.

Gierl, H./Hoser, H. (2002), Der Reihenfolgeeffekt auf Praferenzen, in: Zeitschrift fur be

triebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2002, S. 3-18.

Gilks, W.RJRichardson, SJSpiegelhalter, D.J. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice,

London 1996.

Glaser, W. (1978), Varianzanalyse, Stuttgart, New York 1978.

Goldstein, W.M./Busemeyer, J.R. (1992), The Effect of "Irrelevant" Variables on Decision

Making: Criterion Shifts in Preferential Choice?, in: Organizational Behavior and Hu

man Decision Processes, Vol. 52, No. 3, 1992, S. 425-454.

Green, P.E. (1974), On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives,

in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 1, 1974, S. 61-68.

Green, P.E./Carroll, J.D./Carmone, F.J. (1978), Some New Types of Fractional Designs For

Marketing Experiments, in: Research in Marketing, Vol. 1, 1978, S. 99-122.

Green, P.E./Frank, R.E. (1966), Bayesian Statistics and Marketing Research, in: Applied Sta

tistics, Vol. 15, 1966, S. 173-190.

Green, P.E./Goldberg, S.M./Wiley, J.B. (1983), A Cross-Validation Test of Hybrid Conjoint

Models, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, 1983, S. 147-150.

Green, P.E./Helsen, K. (1989), Cross Validation Assessment of Alternatives to Individual-

Level Conjoint-Analysis: A Case Study, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26,

1989, S. 346-350.

Green, P.E./Krieger, A.M. (1988), Choice Rules and Sensitivity Analysis in Conjoint Simula

tors, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1988, S. 114-

127.

Green, P.E./Krieger, A.M. (2002), What's Right With Conjoint Analysis?, in: Marketing Re

search, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2002, S. 24-27.

Green, P.E./Krieger, A.M./Agarwal, M.K (1993), A Cross-Validation Test of Four Models

for Quantifying Multiattribute Preferences, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1993, S.

369-380.

Green, P.E./Krieger, A.M./Wind, Y.J. (2001), Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections

and Prospects, in: Interfaces, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2001, S. 56-73.

Green, P.E./Rao, V.R. (1971), Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data, in:


Green, P.E./Srinivasan, V. (1978), Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Out

look, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, 1978, S. 103-121.

Green, P.E./Srinivasan, V. (1990), Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments With

Implications for Research and Practice, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1990,

S. 3-19.

Green, P.E./Tull, D.S. (1999), Methoden und Techniken der Marketingforschung, Stuttgart

226

1999.

Green, P.E./Wind, Y.J. (1975), Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Ap

proach, Hinsdale 1975.

Greene, W.H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, 5. Aufl., Upper Saddle River 2003.

Griffin, C.C. et al. (1995), Contingent Valuation and Actual Behavior: Predicting Connections

to New Water Systems in the State of Kerala, India, in: The World Bank Economic Re

view, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1995, S. 373-395.

Gutsche, J. (1995), Produktpraferenzanalyse: ein modelltheoretisches und methodisches Kon-

zept zur Marktsimulation mittels Praferenzerfassungsmodellen, Berlin 1995.

Haaijer, R./Kamakura, W./Wedel, M. (2001), The 'no-choice' alternative to conjoint choice

experiments, in: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43, No.l, 2001, S. 93-

106.

Hagerty, M.R. (1985), Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Fac

tor Analysis and Cluster Analysis, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 22, No. 2,

1985, S. 168-184.

Hagerty, M.R. (1986), The Cost of Simplifying Preference Models, in: Marketing Science,

Vol. 5, No. 4, 1986, S. 298-319.

Hahn, C. (1997), Conjoint- und Discrete Choice-Analyse als Verfahren zur Abbildung von

Praferenzstrukturen und Produktauswahlentscheidungen, Miinster 1997.

Hahn, C./Voeth, M. (1997), Limit-Cards in der Conjoint-Analyse - eine Modifikation der tra-

ditionellen Conjoint-Analyse, Arbeitspapier Nr. 21 des Betriebswirtschaftlichen Instituts

fiir Anlagen und Systemtechnologien der Westfalischen Wilhelms-Universitat Miinster,

Miinster 1997.

Hair, J.F. et al. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5. Aufl., Upper Saddle River, New Jer

sey, USA 1998.

Hamilton, R. W. (2003), What do people suggest what they do not want? Using context effects

to influence others' choices, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2003, S.

492-506.

Hammann, P./Erichson, B. (2000), Marktforschung, 4. Aufl., Stuttgart 2000.

Harrison, G. W./Rutstrom, E.E. (2001), Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypotheti

cal Bias in Value Elicitation Methods, Working Paper B-00-05, The Darla Moore

School of Business, University of South Carolina, South Carolina 2001.

Hartmann, A./Sattler, H (2002a), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Germany, Austria,

and Switzerland; Online im Internet:

<www.henriksattler.de/publikationen/HS AH Commercial2002.pdf> (Abgefagt am

20.01.2004).

Hartmann, A./Sattler, H (2002b), Wie robust sind Methoden zur Praferenzmessung?; Online

im Internet: <www.henriksattler.de/publikationen/ HS_AH_Praeferenz2002.pdf> (Ab-

frage am 20.01.2004).

Hartung, J./Elpelt, B. (1999), Multivariate Statistik, Miinchen, Wien 1999.

227

Hauser, J.R. (1978), Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic

Choice Models: An Information-Theory Approach, in: Operations Research, Vol. 26,

1978,8.406-421.

Hausruckinger, G./Herker, A. (1992), Die Konstruktion von Schatzdesigns fiir Conjoint-

Analysen auf Basis von Paarvergleichen, in: Marketing ZFP, Vol. 14, 1992, S. 99-110.

Heemann, L (2001), Die nutzenorientierte Gestaltung von Kundenkarten mittels Conjoint-

Analyse, in: Muller-Hagedorn, L. (Hrsg.), Kundenbindung im Handel, 2001, S. 177-

219.

Henrichsmeier, S. (1998), Die Entwicklung eines Modells zur Absatzprognose in friihen Pha-

sen der Produktentstehung, Hamburg 1998.

Hensel-Borner, S. (2000), Validitat computergestiitzter hybrider Conjoint-Analysen, Wiesba

den 2000.

Hensel-Borner, S./Sattler, H. (2000), Ein empirischer Validitatsvergleich zwischen der Cus

tomized Computerized Conjoint Analysis (CCC), der Adaptive Conjoint Analysis

(ACA) und Self-Explicated-Verfahren, in: Zeitschrift fiir Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 70,

No. 6, 2000, S. 705-727.

Hensher, D.A. (1984), Archieving Representativeness of the Observable Component of the

Indirect Utility Function in Logit Choice Models: An Empirical Revelation, in: Journal

of Business, Vol. 57, 1984, S. 265-280.

Hensher, D.A./Louviere, J.J./Swait, J. (1999), Combining sources of preference data, in: Jour

nal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, 1999, S. 197-221.

Herriges, J.AJKling, C.L/Azevedo, C. (1999), Linking Revealed and Stated Preferences to

test External Validity, Iowa 1999.

Herrmann, A. (1992), Produktwahlverhalten, Stuttgart 1992.

Herrmann, A./Bauer, H.H (1996), Kundenorientierte Gestaltung des offentlichen Personen-

nahverkehrs, in: Zeitschrift fiir Verkehrswissenschaft, Vol. 67, 1996, S. 327-337.

Herrmann, A./Gutsche, J. (1994), Ein Modell zur Erfassung der Individuellen Markenwech-

selneigung, in: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol.

46, 1994, S. 63-80.

Hildehrandt, L. (1984), Kausalanalytische Validierung in der Marktforschung, in: Marketing

ZFP, Vol. 6, 1984, S. 41-51.

Hilke, W. (1975), Modelle des Konsumentenverhaltens, in: WISU-Studienblatt 7, 1975,

Holbrook, M.B./Moore, W.L (1981), Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal

Versus Pictorial Presentations, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 1981, S. 103-

113.

Homans, G.C. (1961), Social behavior: Its elementary forms, New York 1961.

Homans, G.C. (1978), Theorie der sozialen Gruppe, 7. Aufl., Opladen 1978.

Horowitz, J.L./Louviere, J.J. (1993), Testing Predicted Choices against Observations in Prob

abilistic Discrete-Choice Models, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1993, S. 270-

279.

228

Horowitz, J.L/Louviere, J.J. (1995), What is the role of consideration sets in choice mod

elling?, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, 1995, S. 39-54.

Hoser, H. (1998), Kontextabhangige Praferenzen, Frankfurt a. Main, Berlin 1998.

Hosmer, D. W./Lemeshow, S. (1989), Applied Logistic Regression, New York 1989.

Hossinger, H.-P. (1982), Pretests in der Marktforschung, Wurzburg, Wien 1982.

Howard, J.A./Sheth, J.N. (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York 1969.

Huber, F./Herrmann, A./Gustafsson, A. (2001), On the Influence of the Evaluation Methods

in Conjoint Design - Some Empirical Results, in: Gustafsson, A./Herrmann, A./Huber,

F. (Hrsg.), Conjoint Measurement, Berlin u.a. 2001, S. 183-208.

Huber, G.P. (1974), Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Stud

ies, in: Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 10, 1974, S. 1393-1402.

Huber, J. (1997), What We Have Learned from 20 Years of Conjoint Research: When to Use

Self-Explicated, Graded Pairs, Full Profiles or Choice Experiments, Sawtooth Software

Research Paper Series, Sequim 1997.

Huber, J. (1998), Achieving Individual-Level Predictions from CBC Data: Comparing ICE

and Hierachical Bayes, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim 1998.

Huber, J./Moore, W.L. (1979), A Comparison of Alternative Ways to Aggregate Individual

Conjoint Analyses, in: Landon, L. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the AMA Educators' Confer

ence, Chicago 1979, S. 64-68.

Huber, J./Train, K. (2000), On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individ

ual Mean Partworths, 2000.

Huber, J. et al (1993), The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Procedures in

Predicting Choice, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, 1993, S. 105-114.

Huber, J. et al. (1992), Learning Effects in Preference Tasks: Choice-Based Versus Standard

Conjoint, in: Metegrano, M. (Hrsg.), Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings,

Ketchum 1992, S. 275-282.

Huber, J./Zwerina, K. (1996), The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs,

in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, 1996, S. 307-317.

Hughes, G.D. (1974), The Measurement of Beliefs and Attitudes, in: Ferber, R. (Hrsg.),

Handbook of Marketing Research, 1974, S. 3-43.

Huth, W.-D. (1988), Der Intraorganisationale BeschaffungsentscheidungsprozeB - Ein opera-

tionales Modell, Mainz 1988.

Hiittner, M./Schwarting, U. (2002), Grundziige der Marktforschung, 7. Aufl., Munchen, Wien

2002.

Jackel, P. (2002), Monte Carlo methods in finance, Guildford, Surrey 2002.

Jain, A.K./Mahajan, V./Malhotra, N.K. (1979), Multiattribute preference models for consumer

research: A synthesis, in: Wilkie, W.L (Hrsg.), Advances in Consumer Research, Miami

1979, S. 248-252.

229

Jamieson, L/Bass, F.M. (1989), Adjusted stated intention measures to predict trail purchase

of new products: A comparison of models and methods, in: Journal of Marketing Re

search, Vol. 26, 1989, S. 336-345.

Jeck-Schlottmann, G. (1988), Anzeigenbetrachtung bei geringem Involvement, in: Marketing

ZFP,No. 1,1988,8.33-43.

Jedidi, KJKohli, RJDeSarbo, W.S. (1996), Consideration sets in conjoint analysis, in: Journal

of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1996, S. 364-372.

Johannesson, M. et al (1999), Calibrating Hypothetical Willingness to Pay Responses, in:

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 8, 1999, S. 21-32.

Johnson, E.J./Meyer, RJ./Ghose, S. (1989), When Choice Models Fail: Compensatory Mod

els In Negatively, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1989, S. 255-270.

Johnson, N.L/Kotz, S. (1970), Continuous Univariate Distributions, New York 1970.

Johnson, R.M. (1974), Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values, in: Journal of Marketing Re

search, Vol. 11, 1974, S. 121-127.

Johnson, R.M. (1987a), Accuracy of Utility Estimation in ACA, Sawtooth Software Research

Paper Series, Sequim 1987a.

Johnson, R.M. (1999), The Joys and Sorrows of Implementing HB Methods for Conjoint

Analysis; Online im Internet:

<http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbiovs.pdf>

(Abfrage am 11.12.2004).

Johnson, R.M. (2000), Understanding HB: An Intuitive Approach, Sawtooth Software Re

search Paper Series, Sequim 2000.

Johnson, R.M. (1987b), Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, in: Metegrano, M. (Hrsg.), Proceedings

of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and

Computer Interviewing, No. 2, Ketchum 1987b, S. 253-265.

Johnson, R.M. (1989), Assessing the Validity of Conjoint Analysis, in: Metegrano, M.

(Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Gaining a competitive ad

vantage through PC-based interviewing and analysis, Ketchum 1989, S. 273-280.

Johnson, R.M. (1997), Individual Utilities from Choice Data, in: Metegrano, M. (Hrsg.), Pro

ceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference, Ketchum 1997, S. 191-208.

Johnston, W.J/Lewin, J.E. (1996), Organizational buying behavior: Toward an integrative

framework, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1996, S. 1-16.

Jungst, K./Mengen, A. (1995), Kauferpraferenzmessung mit Conjoint Measurement und

Computational Segmentation, in: Baier, D./Decker, R. (Hrsg.), Marketingprobleme: in

novative Losungsansatze aus Forschung und Praxis, Regensburg 1995, S. 91-102.

Kaas, K.P. (1984), Factors Influencing Consumer Strategies in information processing, in:

Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 1984, S. 585-590.

Kaas, K.P. (1987), Nachfragemodelle im Marketing. Ein kritischer Vergleich, in: Marketing

ZFP, Vol. 9, 1987, S. 229-236.

Kaciak, E./Louviere, J J. (1990), Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Multiple Choice Ex-

230

periment Data, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27, November, 1990, S. 455-

465.

Kahn, BJMoore, W.L/Glazer, R. (1987), Experiments in Constrained Choice, in: Journal of

Consumer Research, June, 1987, S. 96-113.

Kahn, B.EJMeyer, RJ. (1991), Consumer Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute-Weight

Uncertainty, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, 1991, S. 508-522.

Kahneman, DJKnetsch, J.L/Thaler, R.H. (1990), Experimental Tests of the Endowment Ef

fect and the Coase Theorem, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 6, 1990, S.

1325-1348.

Kahneman, D./Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, in:

Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, S. 263-291.

Kalish, S./Nelson, P. (1991), A Comparison of Ranking, Rating and Reservation Price Meas

urement in Conjoint Analysis, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1991, S. 327-335.

Kalwani, M.U./Silk, A J. (1982), On the Reliability and Predicitve Validity of Purchase Inten

tion Measures, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1982, S. 243-286.

Kamakura, W.A./Kim, B.-D./Lee, J. (1996), Modeling Preference and Structural Heterogene

ity in Consumer Choice, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 15, No.2, 1996, S. 152-172.

Kamakura, W.A./Russell, G.J. (1989), A Probabilistic Choice Model For Market Segmenta

tion And Elasticity Structure, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1989,

S. 379-390.

Kassarjian, H.H. (1981), Low Involvement: A Second Look, in: Advances in Consumer Re

search, Vol. 8, 1981, S. 31-34.

Katona, G. (1951), Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior, New York 1951.

Katona, G. (1960), Das Verhalten der Verbraucher und Untemehmer, Tubingen 1960.

Kealy, M.J./Montgomery, M./Dovidio, J.F. (1990), Reliability and Predictive Validity of Con

tingent Values: Does the Nature of the Good Matter?, in: Journal of Environmental Eco

nomics & Management, Vol. 19, 1990, S. 244-263.

Keane, M.P./Wolpin, K.L (1994), The Solution and Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic

Progranmiing Models By Simulation and Interpolation: Monte Carlo Evidence, in: The

Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1994, S. 648-672.

Kearsley, J.F. (1996), Die Werbewirkung direkt-vergleichender Werbung unter besonderer

Berucksichtigung des Involvement-Konstrukts, Gottingen 1996.

Keller, L.R./Staelin, R. (1987), Effects of quality and quantity of information and decision

effectivness, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, 1987, S. 200-213.

Kendall, M.G./Gibbons, J.D. (1990), Rank Correlation Methods, New York 1990.

Keuchel, S. (1993), Wirkungsanalyse von Massnahmen zur Beeinflussung des Verkehrsmit-

telwahlverhaltens - Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Stadt Muns-

terAVestfalen, 1993.

Kinnear, T.C./Taylor, JR. (1996), Marketing Research: An applied approach, 5. Aufl., New

York u.a. 1996.

231

Kirchler, E. (1990), Uberlegungen zur Dynamik von Kaufentscheidungen in der Familie, in:

Jahrbuch der Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1990, S. 55-85.

Kirk, R. (1995), Experimental design: procedures for behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove 1995.

Klayman, J. (1985), Childrens' decision strategies and their adaption to task characteristics, in:

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 35, 1985, S. 179-201.

Klein, M. (2002a), Die Conjoint-Analyse - Eine Einftihrung in das Verfahren mit einem Aus-

blick auf mogliche sozialwissenschaftliche Anwendungen, in: ZA-Information 50, 2002,

S. 7-45.

Klein, M. (2002b), Die Wahmehmung und Bewertung von Wahlplattformen durch die Wah-

ler, in: planung und analyse. No. 1, 2002, S. 52-57.

Klein, M. (2002c), Wahlen als Akt expressiver Praferenzoffenbarung: eine Anwendung der

Conjoint-Analyse auf die Wahl zur Hamburger Burgerschaft vom 21. September 1997,

Frankfurt am Main u.a. 2002c.

Kleindorfer, G.B./0'Neill, L/Ganeshan, R. (1998), Validation in Simulation: Various Po-

sotions in the Philosophy of Science, in: Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 8, 1998, S.

1087-1099.

Koch, K-R. (2000), Einftihrung in die Bayes-Statistik, Beriin u.a 2000.

Kohli, R. (1988), Assessing Attribute Significance in Conjoint Analysis: Nonp, in: Journal of

Marketing Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1988, S. 123-133.

Kotler, P./Bliemel, K (2001), Marketing Management, 10. Aufl., Stuttgart 2001.

Kraffl, M. (1997), Der Ansatz der logistischen Regression und seine Interpretation, in: Zeit-

schrift fiir Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 67, 1997, S. 625-642.

Krishnamurthi, L. (1989), Conjoint Models of Family Decision Making, in: International

Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 5, 1989, S. 185-198.

Kroeber-Riel, W. (1990), Strategic und Technik der Werbung: verhaltenswissenschaftliche

Ansatze, Stuttgart, Beriin, Koln 1990.

Kroeber-Riel, W./Weinberg, P. (2003), Konsumentenverhalten, 8. Aufl., Munchen 2003.

Krugman, H.E. (1965), The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involve

ment, in: Public Opinion Quarteriy, Vol. 29, 1965, S. 349-356.

Kucher, E./Simon, H. (1987), Conjoint Measurement - Durchbruch bei der Preisentscheidung,

in: Harvard Manager, Nr. 3, 1987, S. 28-36.

Kuhfeld, W.F. (1997), Efficient Experimental Designs Using Computerized Searches,

Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim 1997.

Kuhfeld, W.FJTobias, R.D./Garratt, M. (1994), Efficient Experimental Design with Market

ing Research Applications, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, 1994, S. 545-

557.

Kuhl, J. (1985), Volitional Mediators of Cognition-Behavior Consistency: Self-Regulatory

Processes and Action Versus State Orientation, in: Kuhl, J./Beckmann, J. (Hrsg.), Action

Control: From Cognition to Behaviour, Beriin u.a. 1985, S. 101-128.

Kuhnel, S.-M. (1993), Zwischen Boykott und Kooperation. Teilnahmeabsicht und Teilnahme-

232

verhalten bei der Volkszahlung 1987, Frankfurt 1993.

Kufi, AJTomczak, T. (2004), Kauferverhalten, 3. Aufl., Stuttgart 2004.

Lahih, KJGao, J. (2002), Bayesian analysis of nested logit models by Markov chain Monte

Carlo, in: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 111, 2002, S. 103-133.

Laurent, G./Kapferer, J.N. (1985), Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles, in: Journal of

Advertising Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1985, S. 41-53.

Leavitt, C./Greenwald, A.G./Obermiller, C. (1981), What is Low Involvement Low In?, in: Advances in Consumer Research, No. 8, 1981, S. 15-19.

Leclerc, F./Schmitt, B.H./Dube, L. (1995), Wasting time and decision making: Is time like

money?, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, 1995, S. 110-119.

Leigh, T.W./MacKay, D.B./Summers, J.O. (1984), Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analy

sis and Self-explicated Weights: A Comparison, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.

21, 1984, S. 456-462.

Lenk, P.J. et al (1996), Hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heteroge

neity from reduced experimental designs, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1996,

S. 173-191.

Lichtenstein, S./Slovic, P. (1971), Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gam

bling decisions, in: Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 89, 1971, S. 46-55.

Lichtenstein, S./Slovic, P. (1973), Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An

extended replication in Las Vegas, in: Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 101,

1973, S. 16-20.

Lienert, G.A./Raatz, U. (1998), Testaufbau und Testanalyse, 6. Aufl., Weinheim 1998.

Lindberg, E./Gdrling, T./Montgomery, H. (1989), Differential Predictability of Preferences

and Choices, in: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 2, 1989, S. 205-219.

Lindman, H.R. (1971), Inconsistent preferences among gambles, in: Journal of Experimental

Psychology, Vol. 89, 1971, S. 390-397.

Louviere, C.H. et al (2002), Dissecting the Random Component of Utility, in: Marketing Let

ters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, S. 177-193.

Louviere, J.J. (1988), Conjoint Analysis Modelling of Stated Preferences: A Review of The

ory, Methods, Recent Developments and External Validity, in: Journal of Transport

Economics and Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1988, S. 93-119.

Louviere, J.J. (2001a), Combining Sources of Preference Data, in: Hensher, D. (Hrsg.),

Travel Behaviour Research, The leading Edge, 1st, Sydney 2001, S. 125-144.

Louviere, J.J. (2001b), Combining Data Sources, in: Hensher, D. (Hrsg.), Travel Behaviour

Research, The leading Edge, 1st, Sydney 2001, S. 247-258.

Louviere, J J. (1984), Hierarchical information integration: A new method for the design and

analysis of complex multiattribute judgement problems, in: Advances in Consumer Re

search, Vol. 11, 1984, S. 148-155.

Louviere, JJ/Fox, M.F./Moore, W.L (1993), Cross-Task Validity Comparison of Stated

Preference Choice Models, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1993, S. 205-213.

233

Louviere, JJ./Gaeth, GJ. (1987), Decomposing the Determinants of Retail Facility Choice

Using the Method of Hierarchical Information Integration: A Supermarket Illustration,

in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 63, 1987, S. 25-48.

Louviere, JJ./Gaeth, G.J. (1988), A Comparison of Rating and Choice Responses in Conjoint

Tasks, in: Johnson, R.M. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference of

Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing No. 2, Ketchum

1988, S. 59-73.

Louviere, JJ./Hensher, D.A./Swait, J.D. (2000), Stated choice methods, Cambridge 2000.

Louviere, J.J. et al. (1987), Do the Parameters of Choice Models Depend on Differences in

Stimulus Presentation: Visual versus Verbal Presentation?, in: Advances in Consumer

Research, Vol. 14, 1987, S. 79-82.

Louviere, J.J./Woodworth, G.G. (1983), Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice

or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data, in: Journal of Mar


Luce, R.D. (1959), Individual Choice Behavior, New York 1959.

Luce, R.D./Suppes, P. (1965), Preference, utility, and subjective probability, in: Luce,

R.D./Bush, R./Galanter, E. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, New York

1965, S. 249-265.

Luce, R.D./Tukey, J.W. (1964), Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fun

damental Measurement, in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1964, S.

1-27.

Luck, H.E. (1974), Testen und Messen von Eigenschaften und Einstellungen, in: Koolwijk,

J.v./Wieken-Mayser, M. (Hrsg.), Techniken der empirischen Sozialforschung, Testen

und Messen, Munchen 1974, S. 77-102.

Lynch Jr, J.G. (1982), On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research, in:

Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1982, S. 225-239.

Madansky, A. (1980), On Conjoint Analysis and Quantal Choice Models, in: Journal of Busi

ness, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1980, S. S37-S44.

Malhotra, N.K. (1983), A Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Procedures for Analyzing

Binary Data, in: Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1983, S. 326-

336.

Malhotra, N.K. (1984), The Use of Linear Logit Models in Marketing Research, in: Journal of

Marketing Research, Vol. 21, 1984, S. 20-32.

Manrai, A.K./Andrews, R.L. (1998), Two stage discrete choice-models for scanner panel data:

An assessment of process and assumptions, in: European Journal of Operational Re

search, Vol. I l l , 1998, S. 193-215.

Manski, C.F. (1977), The Structure of Random Utility Models, in: Theory and Decision, Vol.

8, 1977, S. 229-254.

Marschak, J. (1960), Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators, in: K., A.

(Hrsg.), Stanford Symposium on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stand-

234

ford, CA 1960,8.312-329.

Mayer, H./Boor, W. (1988), Familie und Konsumentenverhalten, in: Jahrbuch der Absatz- und

Verbrauchsforschung, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1988, S. 120-153.

Mazanec, J.A. (1976), Die Schatzung des Beitrags einzelner Produkteigenschaften zur Mar-

kenpraferenz als Problem der Polynomialen Verbundmessung: Ein Demonstrationsbei-

spiel fur Zinsertrag und Bindungsdauer als Haupteigenschaften von Sparformen, Ar-

beitspapier 6, Wien 1976.

McCullough, D. (2002), A User's Guide to Conjoint Analysis, in: Marketing Research, Vol.

14, No. 2, 2002, S. 19-23.

McCullough, D. (k.A.), Trade-Off Study Sample Size: How Long Can We Go?; Online im

Internet: <http://www.macroinc.com/docs/samplesize toff.doo (Abgefragt am

20.01.2004)

McFadden, D. (1976), Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey, in: Annals of Economic and So

cial Measurement, Vol. 5, 1976, S. 363-390.

McFadden, D. (1980), Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice among Products, in:

Journal of Business, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1980, S. S13-S29.

McFadden, D. (1986), The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research, in: Marketing Sci

ence, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1986, S. 275-297.

McFadden, D. (2001a), Economic choices, in: The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No.

3, 2001a, S. 351-378.

McFadden, D. (2001b), Disaggregate Behavioural Travel Demand's RUM Side: A 30-Year

Retrospective, in: Hensher, D. (Hrsg.), Travel Behaviour Research, The Leading Edge,

1st, Sydney 2001b, 17-63.

McFadden, D. (1978), Modeling the Choice of Residential Location, in: Karlqvist, A. et al.

(Hrsg.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, Amsterdam 1978, S. 75-96.

McFadden, D. (1981), Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in: Manski,

C.F./McFadden, D. (Hrsg.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Ap

plications, Cambridge, MA 1981, S. 198-272.

McFadden, D. (1974), Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour, in: Za-

rembka, P. (Hrsg.), Frontiers of Econometrics, New York 1974, S. 105-142.

McQuarrie, E.F./Munson, J.M. (1992), A Revised Product Involvement Inventory: Improved

Usability and Validity, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19, 1992, S. 108-115.

Meffert, C. (2002), Profilierung von Dienstleistungsmarken in vertikalen Systemen, Wiesba

den 2002.

Meffert, H. (1971), Modelle des Kauferverhaltens und ihr Aussagewert ftir das Marketing, in:

Zeitschrift ftir die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, Vol. 127, No. 2, 1971, S. 326-353.

Meffert, K (1992), Marketingforschung und Kauferverhalten, Wiesbaden 1992.

Meffert, K (2000), Marketing, 9. Aufl., Wiesbaden 2000.

235

Melles, TJHolling, H. (1998), Einsatz der Conjoint-Analyse in Deutschland. Eine Befragung

von Anwendem, unveroffentlichter Ergebnisbericht des Psychologischen Instituts IV

der Westfalischen Wilhelms-Universitat, Munster 1998.

Mengen, A./Simon, H. (1996), Produkt- und Preisgestaltung mit Conjoint Measurement, in:

Das Wirtschaftsstudium, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1996, S. 229-236.

Mengen, A./Tacke, G. (1995), Methodengestiitztes Automobil-Pricing mit Conjoint Measure

ment, in: Reuss, H. (Hrsg.), Wettbewerbsvorteile im Automobilhandel: Strategien und

Konzepte fur ein erfolgreiches Vertragshandler-Management, Frankfurt a.M. u.a. 1995,

S. 220-240.

Meyer, RJ./Johnson, EJ. (1989), Information overload and the nonrobustness of linear mod

els: a comment on Keller and Staelin, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, 1989,

S. 498-503.

Montgomery, D.B./Wittink, D.R. (1980), The Predictive Validity of Conjoint Analysis for Al

ternative Aggregation Schemes, in: Montgomery, D.B./Wittink, D.R. (Hrsg.), Market

Measurement and Analysis: Proceedings of ORSA/TMS Special Interest Conference,

Cambridge, MA 1980, S. 298-308.

Montgomery, H. et al. (1994), The Judgment-Choice Discrepancy: Noncompatibility or Re

structuring?, in: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 7, 1994, S. 145-155.

Moore, W.L/Gray-Lee, J./Louviere, J.J. (1998), A Cross-Validity Comparison of Conjoint

Analysis and Choice Models at Different Levels of Aggregation, in: Marketing Letters,

Vol.9,No.2, 1998,8.195-207.

Moore, W.L./Pessemier, E.A./Lehmann, D.R. (1986), Hierarchical Representations of Market

Structures and Choice Processes Through Preference Trees, in: Journal of Business Re

search, Vol. 14, 1986, S. 371-386.

Morwitz, V.G./Johnson, E./Schmittlein, D. (1993), Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?,

in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1993, S. 46-61.

Morwitz, V.G./Schmittlein, D. (1992), Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forecasts Based

on Purchase Intent: Which "Intenders" Actually Buy?, in: Journal of Marketing Re

search, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1992, S. 391-405.

Morwitz, V.G./Steckel, J.H./Gupta, A. (1997), When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales?,

Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge 1997.

Muehling, D.D./Laczniak, R.N./Andrews, JC. (1993), Defining, Operationalizing, and Using

Involvement in Advertising Research: A Review, in: Journal of Current Issues and Re

search in Advertising, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1993, S. 21-57.

Muhlbacher, H. (1982), Selektive Werbung, Linz 1982.

Mailer, S./Kesselmann, P. (1994), Die Preisbereitschaft von Konsumenten bei umweltfreund-

lich verpackten Produkten - Ergebnisse einer Conjoint-Analyse, in: Zeitschrift fiir be-

triebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 46. Jg., H. 3, 1994, S. 260-278.

Muller-Hagedorn, L. (1986), Das Konsumentenverhalten, Wiesbaden 1986.

Muller-Hagedorn, L./Sewing, E./Toporowski, W. (1993), Zur Validitat von Conjoint-

236

Analysen, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 45. Jg., H. 2, 1993, S.

123-148.

Nape, S. et al. (2003), Hypothetical Bias and Willingness to accept, in: Economic Letters,

Vol. 78, 2003, S. 423-430.

Narayana, C.L/Markin, R.J. (1975), Consumer Behavior and Product Performance: An Al

ternative Conceptualization, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, 1975, S. 1-6.

Natter, M./Feurstein, M. (2001a), Real World Performance of Choice-Based Conjoint Mod

els; Online im Internet: <http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/am/Download/report58.pdf> (Ab-

frage am: 24.02.).

Natter, M./Feurstein, M. (2001b), Correcting for CBC Model Bias: A Hybrid Scanner Data -

Conjoint Model; Online im Internet:

<http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/am/Download/report57.pdf> (Abfrage am: 24.02.).

Natter, M./Feurstein, M./Kehl, L. (1999), Forecasting Scanner Data by Choice-Based Con

joint Models in: Proceedings of the 1999 Sawtooth Software Conference, February 2-

5; Online im Internet: <http://indi.wu-wien.ac.at/~natter/sawtooth.pdf> (Abfrage am:

30.09.).

Naylor, T.H./Finger, J.M. (1967), Verification of computer simulation models, in: Manage

ment Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1967, S. B-92-B-101.

Nedungadi, P. (1990), Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without

Altering Brand Evaluations, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1990, S.

263-276.

Neibecker, B. (1985), Konsumentenemotionen: Messung durch computergestiitzte Verfahren,

Wiirzburg, Wien 1985.

Neill, H.R. et al. (1994), Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments, in: Land

Economics, Vol. 70, No. 2, 1994, S. 145-154.

Newell, A./Simon, H.A. (1972), Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1972.

Nieschlag, R./Dichtl, E./Horschgen, H. (2002), Marketing, 18. Aufl., Berlin 2002.

Nunnally, J.C./Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric theory, 3. Aufl., New York u.a. 1994.

Oliphant, K. et al. (1992), Cross-Task Comparison of Ratings-Based and Choice-Based Con

joint, in: Metegrano, M. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference,

Ketchum 1992, S. 383-404.

Olsen, G.D./Swait, J. (1993), The Importance of Nothing, Working Paper, The University of

Calgary, Calgary 1993.

Olshavsky, R.W. (1985), Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision Making: An Integrated

Theoretical Perspective, in: Jacoby, J./Olson, J.C. (Hrsg.), Perceived Quality - How

Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Lexington 1985, S. 3-30.

Olshavsky, R.W./Granbois, D.H. (1979), Consumer Decision Making - Fact or Fiction?, in:


237

Onken, JJHastie, R./Revelle, W. (1985), Individual differences in the use of simplification

strategies in a complex decision-making task, in: Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Human Perception Performance, Vol. 11, 1985, S. 14-27.

Orme, B. (2000), Hierarchical Bayes: Why All the Attention?; Online im Internet:

<http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbwhy.pdf> (Abfrage am

11.12.2004).

Orme, B. (2003), Introduction to Market Simulators for Conjoint Analysis, Sawtooth Soft

ware Research Paper Series, Sequim, WA 2003.

Orme, B./Huber, J. (2(X)0), Improving the Value of Conjoint Simulations, in: Marketing Re

search, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2000, S. 12-21.

Otter, T. (2001), Conjointanalyse zur Messung und Erklarung von Markenwert, Wien 2001.

Parkinson, T.L/Reilly, M. (1979), An Information Processing Approach to Evoked Set For

mation, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, 1979, S. 227-231.

Payne, J. W. (1982), Contingent Decision Behavior, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 92, No. 2,

1982, S. 382-402.

Payne, J.W./Bettman, J.RJJohnson, EJ. (1988), Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision

Making, in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,

Vol. 14, No. 3, 1988, S. 534-552.

Payne, J.W./Bettman, J.R./Johnson, E.J. (1992), A Constructive Processing Perspective, in:

Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 43, 1992, S. 87-131.

Payne, J.W./Bettman, J.R./Schkade, D.A. (1999), Measuring Constructed Preferences: To

wards a Building Code, in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 19, No. 1-3, 1999, S.

243-270.

Perkins, W.S./Roundy, J. (1993), Discrete Choice Surveys by Telephone, in: Journal of the

Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1993, S. 33-38.

Perrey, J. (1996), Erhebungsdesigneffekte bei der Conjoint-Analyse, in: Marketing ZFP, H. 2,

1996, S. 105-116.

Perrey, J. (1998), Nutzenorientierte Marktsegmentierung - Ein integrativer Ansatz zum Ziel-

gruppenmarketing im Verkehrsdienstleistungsbereich, Wiesbaden 1998.

Peter, J.P. (1979), Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing prac

tices, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, 1979, S. 6-17.

Pinnell, J./Englert, S. (1997), The Number of Choice Alternatives in Discrete Choice Model

ling, in: Metegrano, M. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference,

Ketchum 1997, S. 121-153.

Plinke, W. (1995), Grundlagen des Marktprozesses, in: Kleinaltenkamp, M./Plinke, W.

(Hrsg.), Technischer Vertrieb, Berlin u.a. 1995, S. 3-95.

Poiesz, T.B.C./Cees, J.P./de Bont, M. (1995), Do We Need Involvement to Understand Con

sumer Behavior?, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, No. 25, 1995, S. 448-

451.

Poirier, D.J. (1996), A Bayesian analysis of nested logit models, in: Journal of Econometrics,

238

Vol. 75, 1996, S. 163-181.

Popper, K.R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific discovery. New York 1959.

Pras, B. (1978), Explaining Consumer Decision Making through Evaluation Process Models,

in: Topritzhofer, E. (Hrsg.), Marketing: Neue Ergebnisse aus Forschung und Praxis,

Wiesbaden 1978, S. 145-161.

Pullman, M.E./Dodson, KJ./Moore, W.L (1999), A Comparison of Conjoint Methods When

There Are Many Attributes, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 10, 1999, S. 1-14.

Pullman, M.E./Moore, W.L/Wardell, D.G. (2002), A comparison of quality function deploy

ment and conjoint analysis in new product design, in: The Journal of Product Innovation

Management, Vol. 19, 2002, S. 354-364.

Punj, G.N./Staelin, R. (1978), The Choice Process for Graduate Business Schools, in: Journal

of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, 1978, S. 588-598.

Quandt, R.E. (1968), Estimation of Modal Splits, in: Transportation Research, Vol. 2, 1968,

S. 41-50.

Ramaswamy, V. (2001), Latent class models for conjoint analysis, in: Gustafsson,

A./Herrmann, AJHuber, F. (Hrsg.), Conjoint Measurement, Berlin u.a. 2001, S. 361-

392.

Ramaswamy, V./Cohen, S.H. (2003), Latent class models for conjoint analysis, in: Gustafsson,

A./Herrmann, AJHuber, F. (Hrsg.), Conjoint Measurement, Berlin u.a. 2003, S. 441-

472.

Ramaswamy, V./DeSarbo, W.S. (1990), SCULPTURE: A New Methodology for Deriving and

Analyzing Hierarchical Product-Market Structures From Panel Data, in: Journal of Mar


Rao, V.RJGautschi, D.A. (1982), The Role of Price in Individual Utility Judgments: Devel

opment and Empirical Validation of Alternative Models, in: McAlister, L. (Hrsg.),

Choice Models for Buyer Behaviour, Research in Marketing, Supplement 1, Greenwich

1982, S. 57-80.

Rao, V.RJSolgaard, H.S. (1978), An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Multiattribute Util

ity Models, in: Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Vol. 43,

1978, S. 27-31.

Reibstein, D./Bateson, J.E.G./Boulding, W. (1988), Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical

Findings, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1988, S. 271-286.

Reichenbach, H. (1951), The Rise of Scientific Discovery, Berkeley 1951.

Renken, T. (1997), Disaggregate Discrete Choice, in: Marketing Research, Vol. 9, No. 1,

1997, S. 18-22.

Rossi, P.E./Allenby, G.M. (2003), Bayesian statistics and marketing, in: Marketing Science,

Vol. 22, No. 3, 2003, S. 304-328.

Sabel, H (1977), Marktforschung und Produktgestaltung, in: Behrens, K.C.H (Hrsg.), Hand-

buch der Marktforschung, 2. Halbband, Wiesbaden 1977, S. 901-923.

239

Samuelson, P.A. (1938), A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour, in:

Economica, Vol. 5, 1938, S. 61-71.

Sdndor, Z./Wedel, M. (2001), Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior

Beliefs, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, 2001, S. 430-444.

Sattler, H. (1994), Die Validitat von Produkttests, in: Marketing ZFP, 16. Jg., H. 1, 1994, S.

31-41.

Sattler, H./Gedenk, K./Hensel-Borner, S. (2002), Bandbreiten-Effekte bei multiattributiven

Entscheidungen: Ein empirischer Vergleich von Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Eigen-

schaftsgewichten, in: Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft, 72. Jg., H. 9, 2002, S. 953-977.

Sattler, H./Hensel-Borner, S. (2001), A Comparison of Conjoint Measurement with Self-

Explicated Approaches, in: Gustafsson, A./Herrmann, A./Huber, F. (Hrsg.), Conjoint

Measurement, Beriin u.a. 2001, S. 121-133.

Sattler, H./Hensel-Borner, S./Kriiger, B. (2001), Die Abhangigkeit der Validitat von Conjoint-

Studien von demographischen Probanden-Charakteristika: Neue empirische Befunde, in:

Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft, 71. Jg., H. 7, 2001, S. 771-787.

Sattler, H/Nitschke, T. (2001), Ein empirischer Vergleich von Instrumenten zur Erhebung

von Zahlungsbereitschaften, Research Papers on Marketing and Retailing, No. 1, Ham

burg 2001.

Sattler, H/Nitschke, T. (2003), Ein empirischer Vergleich von Instrumenten zur Erhebung

von Zahlungsbereitschaften, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol.

55,2003,8.364-381.

Sawtooth (1999), The CBC/HB Module for Hierarchical Bayes Estimation; Sequim, WA

1999.

Sawtooth (2003), CBC Hierarchical Bayes Analysis: Technical Paper (Version 3.1), Sequim,

WA 2003.

Sawtooth (o.A.), CBC Hierarchical Bayes Analysis: Technical Paper (Version 3.0), Sequim,

WA.

Scharf, A. (1991), Konkurrierende Produkte aus Konsumentensicht, Frankfurt a.M. 1991.

Scharf, A./Schubert, BJVolkmer, H-P. (1997), Konzepttests mittels bildgestiitzter Choice-

Based Conjointanalyse, in: planung & analyse, Nr. 5, 1997, S. 24-28.

Schellinck, D.A. (1983), Cue choice as a function of time pressure and perceived risk, in: Ad

vances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, 1983, S. 470-475.

Schneider, C. (1997), Praferenzbildung bei Qualitatsunsicherheit: das Beispiel Wein, Berlin

1997.

Schnell, R./Hill, P.BJEsser, E. (1999), Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 6. Aufl.,

Miinchen u.a. 1999.

Schubert, B. (1991), Entwicklung von Konzepten fur Produktinnovationen mittels Conjoint-

Analyse, Stuttgart 1991.

Schwarz, G. (1978), Estimating the Dimension of a Model, in: Annals of Statistic, Vol. 6,

1978, S. 461-464.

240

Schweikl, H. (1985), Computergestlitzte Praferenzanalyse mit individuell wichtigen Produkt-

merkmalen, Berlin 1985.

Scott, J.E./Keiser, S.K. (1984), Forecasting Acceptance of New Industrial Products with

Judgment Modeling, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48, 1984, S. 54-67.

Seip, K./Strand, J. (1992), Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A Con

tingent Valuation Study with Real Payment, in: Environmental and Resource Econom

ics, Vol. 2, 1992, S. 91-106.

Sensch, J. (1987), Okonometrische Modelle mit qualitativen abhangigen Variablen, Bielefeld

1987.

Shannon, R.E. (1975), Systems Simulation: the Art and Science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1975.

Sheluga, D.A./Jaccard, J./Jacoby, J. (1979), Preference, Search, and Choice: An Integrative

Approach, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 6, 1979, S. 166-176.

Sheth, J.N. (1974), Models of Buyer Behavior, New York 1974.

Sheth, J.N./Raju, P.S. (1979), Wahlentscheidungen und ProzeBmodelle des Informationsver-

haltens von Konsumenten, in: Meffert, H./Steffenhagen, H./Freter, H. (Hrsg.), Konsu-

mentenverhalten und Information, Wiesbaden 1979, S. 147-159.

Shields, M.D. (1983), Effects of information supply and demand on judgment accuracy: evi

dence from corporate managers, in: Accounting Review, Vol. 58, 1983, S. 284-303.

Shocker, A.D. et al. (1991), Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and

Choice: Issues, Models, and Suggestions, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, S.

181-197.

Shocker, A.D./Srinivasan, V. (1979), Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evalua

tion and Generation: A Critical Review, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16,

1979, S. 158-180.

Simon, H. (1992), Preismanagement, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden 1992.

Simon, H. (1994), Was ist dem Kunden Leistung wert?, in: absatzwirtschaft, H. 2, 1994, S.

74-77.

Simon, H./Kucher, E. (1988), Die Bestimmung empirischer Preisabsatzfunktionen, in: Zeit-

schrift fur Betriebswirtschaft, 58. Jg., H. 1, 1988, S. 171-183.

Simon, H.A. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice, in: Quarterly Journal of Ecomom-

etrics. Vol. 69, February, 1955, S. 99-118.

Simonson, I./Tversky, A. (1992), Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aver

sion, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1992, S. 281-295.

Skiera, B./Gensler, S. (2002), Berechnung von Nutzenfunktionen und Marktsimulationen mit

Hilfe der Conjoint-Analyse (Teil I), in: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, H. 4,

2002, S. 200-263.

Skiera, B./Revenstorff, I. (1999), Auktionen als Instrument zur Erhebung von Zahlungsbereit-

schaften, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 51. Jg., H. 3, 1999, S.

224-242.

241

Skrondal, A. (2000), Design and Analysis of Monte Carlo Experiments: Attacking the Con-

vential Wisdom, in: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2000, S. 137-167.

Slavic, P. (1995), The Construction Preference, in: American Psychologist, Vol. 50, No. 5,

1995,8.364-371.

Smead, RJJWilcox, J.B./Wilkes, R.B. (1981), How Valid Are Product Descriptions and Proto

cols in Choice Experiments?, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 1981, S. 37-42.

Smith, A.F.M. (1993), Bayesian Computation via the Gibbs Sampler and Related Markov

Chain Monte Carlo Methods, in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol.

55, No. 1, 1993, S. 3-23.

Snyder, M. (1972), Individual Differences and the Self-Control of Expressive Behavior, Stan

ford 1972.

Srinivasan, V. (1975), Linear Progranmiing Computational Procedures for Ordinal Regres

sion, in: Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 23, 1975, S. 475-

487.

Srinivasan, V. (1982), Comments on the Role of Price in Individual Utility Judgements, in:

McAlister, L (Hrsg.), Choice Models for Buyer Behaviour, Research in Marketing,

Supplement 1, Greenwich 1982, S. 81-90.

Srinivasan, V./deMaCarty, P. (1998), An Alternative Approach to the Predictive Validation of

Conjoint Models, Research Paper No. 1483, Stanford 1998.

Srinivasan, V./deMaCarty, P. (2000), Predictive Validation of Multiattribute Choice Models,

in: Marketing Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, S. 29-34.

Srinivasan, V. et al (1981), Forecasting the Effectiveness of Work-Trip Gasoline Conserva

tion Policies through Conjoint Analysis, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, 1981, S. 157-

172.

Srinivasan, V./Jain, A.KJMalhotra, N.K. (1983), Improving Predictive Power of Conjoint

Analysis by Constrained Parameter Estimation, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.

20, 1983, S. 433-438.

Srinivasan, V./Shocker, A.D. (1973), Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional

Analysis of Preferences, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1973, S. 337-369.

Stadie, E. (1998), Medial gestiitzte Limit Conjoint-Analyse als Innovationstest fiir technologi-

sche Basisinnovationen, Miinster u.a. 1998.

Stallmeier, C. (1993), Die Bedeutung der Datenerhebungsmethode und des Untersuchungsde-

signs fiir die Ergebnisstabilitat der Conjoint-Analyse, Regensburg 1993.

Steenkamp, J.-B. (1994), The metric quality of full-profile judgements and the number-of-

attribute-levels effect in conjoint analysis, in: International Journal of Research in Mar

keting, Vol. 11, 1994, S. 275-286.

Steiner, WJ./Hruschka, H. (2000), Conjointanalyse-basierte Produkt(linien)gestaltung unter

Berucksichtigung von Konkurrenzreaktionen, in: OR Spektrum, Vol. 22, S. 71-95, 2000,

Sunderstrom, G.A. (1987), Information search and decision making: the effects of information

displays, in: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 65, 1987, S. 165-179.

242

Svenson, O./Edland, A. (1987), Changes of preferences under time pressure: choices and

judgements, in: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 28, 1987, S. 322-330.

Swait, J./Adamowicz, W./Hanemann, M.e.a. (2002), Context Dependence and Aggregation in

Disaggregate Choice Analysis, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, S. 195-205.

Swait, J./Andrews, R.L (2(X)3), Enriching Scanner Panel Models with Choice Experiments,

in: Marketing Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2003, S. 442-460.

Swait, J./Louviere, C.H. (1993), The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Com

parison of Multinominal Logit Models, in: Joumal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30,

1993, S. 305-314.

Tauber, E.M. (1977), Predictive Validity in Consumer Research, in: Joumal of Advertising

Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1977, S. 59-64.

Teichert, T. (1994), Zur Validitat der in Conjoint-Analysen ermittelten Nutzenwerte, in: Zeit-

schrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 46. Jg., H. 7/8, 1994, S. 610-629.

Teichert, T. (1998), Schatzgenauigkeit von Conjoint-Analysen, in: Zeitschrift ftir Betriebs-

wirtschaft, 68. Jg., H. 11, 1998, S. 1245-1266.

Teichert, T (2001a), Nutzenschatzung in Conjoint-Analysen, Wiesbaden 2001a.

Teichert, T (2001b), Nutzenermittlung in wahlbasierter Conjoint-Analyse: Ein Vergleich von

Latent-Class- und hierarchischem Bayes-Verfahren, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirt

schaftliche Forschung, 53. Jg., 2001b, S. 798-822.

Teichert, T (2000), Conjoint-Analyse, in: Herrmann, A./Homhurg, C. (Hrsg.), Marktfor-

schung, Wiesbaden 2000, S. 471-511.

Theil, H. (1970), On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables, in:

American Joumal of Sociology, Vol. 76, 1970, S. 103-154.

Theuerkauf, I. (1989), Kundennutzenmessung mit Conjoint, in: Zeitschrift fiir Betriebswirt-

schaft, 59. Jg., H. 11, 1989, S. 1179-1192.

Thomas, L (1979), Conjoint Measurement als Instmment der Absatzforschung, in: Marketing

ZFP,Nr. 1,1979,S. 199-211.

Thomas, L (1983), Der EinfluB von Kindem auf die Produktpraferenzen ihrer Mutter, Berlin

1983.

Tiede, M. (1995), Statistische Logit-Analyse: Fine Orientiemngshilfe fiir die Verwendung des

binaren Logit-Modells, Diskussionspapier Nr. 95-3, Fakultat fiir Sozialwissenschaft der

Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Bochum 1995.

Titterington, D.MJSmith, A.F.M./Makov, U.E. (1985), Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture

Distributions, New York 1985.

Topritzhofer, E. (1974), Absatzwirtschaftliche Modelle des Kaufentscheidungsprozesses,

Wien 1974.

Toubia, O./Hauser, J.RJSimester, D.I. (2004), Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-

Based Conjoint Analysis, in: Joumal of Marketing Research, Vol. 41, 2004, S. 116-131.

Toubia, O. et al. (2003), Fast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation, in: Marketing Sci

ence, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2003, S. 273-303.

243

Toutenburg, H. (1992), Modeme nichtparametrische Verfahren der Risikoanalyse, Heidelberg

1992.

Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice methods with simulation, Cambridge 2003.

Trommsdorff, V. (2003), Konsumentenverhalten, 4. Aufl., Stuttgart 2003.

Trommsdorff, V. (1995), Involvement, in: Tietz, BJKohler, T.R. (Hrsg.), Handworterbuch des

Marketing, 1995, S. 1067-1078.

Trommsdorff, V./Bleicker, U./Hildebrandt, L. (1980), Nutzen und Einstellung, in: Wirt-

schaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 9. Jg., H. 6, 1980, S. 269-276.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1991), Ein empirischer Vergleich der Eignung von Conjoint-Analyse und

"Analytic Hierarchy Process" (AHP) zur Neuproduktplanung, in: Zeitschrift fur be-

triebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 61. Jg., H. 11, 1991, S. 1267-1280.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1992), Optimale Produktgestaltung: Erfolgsprognose mit Analytic Hierarchy

Process und Conjoint-Analyse, Wiesbaden 1992.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1996), Determinanten der Validitat der Conjoint-Analyse, in: von Ahsen,

A./Czenskowsky, T. (Hrsg.), Marketing und Marktforschung: Entwicklungen, Erweite-

rungen und Schnittstellen im nationalen und internationalen Kontext, Hamburg 1996, S.

585-598.

Tscheulin, D.K/Blaimont, C. (1993), Die Abhangigkeit der Prognosegiite von Conjoint-

Studien von demographischen Probanden-Charakteristika, in: Zeitschrift fiir Betriebs-

wirtschaft, 63. Jg., H. 8, 1993, S. 839-847.

Tversky, A. (1972), Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice, in: Psychological Review,

Vol. 79, 1972,8.281-299.

Tversky, A./Sattath, S./Slovic, P. (1988), Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice, in:

Psychological Review, Vol. 95, No. 3, 1988, S. 371-384.

Tversky, A./Shafir, E. (1992), Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision, in:

Psychological Science, Vol. 6, 1992, S. 358-361.

Tversky, A./Simonson, I. (1993), Context-dependent preferences, in: Management Science,

Vol. 39, No. 10, 1993, S. 1179-1189.

Umesh, U.N./Mishra, S. (1990), A Monte Carlo Investigation of Conjoint Analysis Index-Of-

Fit: Goodness of Fit, Significance and Power, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1990,

S. 33-44.

Untiedt, G. (1992), Das Erwerbsverhalten verheirateter Frauen in der Bundesrepublik

Deutschland: eine mikrookonomische Untersuchung, Heidelberg 1992.

Urban, D. (1989), Binare LOGIT-Analyse: ein statistisches Verfahren zur Bestimmung der

Abhangigkeitsstruktur qualitativer Variablen, Duisburger Beitrage zur Soziologischen

Forschung, Nr. 3/1989, Duisburg 1989.

Urban, D. (1993), Logit-Analyse: statistische Verfahren zur Analyse von Modellen mit quali-

tativen Response-Variablen, Stuttgart u.a. 1993.

Urbany, J.E./Dickson, P.R. (1990), Prospect Theory and Pricing Decisions, in: Journal of Be

havioral Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1990, S. 69-80.

244

Ursic, M.L/Helgeson, J.G. (1990), The Impact of Choice Phase and Task Complexity on

Consumer Decision Making, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 21, 1990, S. 69-90.

van der Lans, I.A./Heiser, W.J. (1992), Constrained Part-Worth Estimation in Conjoint

Analysis Using the Self-Explicated Utility Model, in: International Journal of Research

in Marketing, Vol. 9, 1992, S. 325-344.

van Horn, R.L. (1971), Validation of simulation results, in: Management Science, Vol. 17,

No. 5, 1971, S. 247-258.

van Raaij, W.F. (1981), Economic Psychology, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 1,

1981, S. 1-24.

van Raaij, W.F. (1988), Information Processing and Decision making: Cognitive Aspects of

Economic Behaviour, in: van Raaij, W.F./van Veldhoven, G.M./Wdrneryd, K.E. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Economic Psychology, Dordrecht 1988, S. 74-106.

Verhoef, P.C./Franses, P.H. (2002), On combining revealed and stated preferences to forecast

customer behavior: three case studies. Econometric Institute Report 2002-04, Rotterdam

2002.

Verhoef, P.C./Franses, P.H. (2003), Combining revealed and stated preferences to forecast

customer behaviour: Three case studies, in: International Journal of Market Research,

Vol. 45, 2003, S. 467-474.

Verlegh, P.W.J./Schifferstein, HN.J./Wittink, D.R. (2002), Range and Number-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance, in: Marketing Letters,

Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, S. 41-52.

Voeth, M. (1999), 25 Jahre conjointanalytische Forschung in Deutschland, in: Zeitschrift fiir

Betriebswirtschaft, Erganzungsheft, No. 2, 1999, S. 153-176.

Voeth, M. (2000), Nutzenmessung in der Kaufverhaltensforschung, Wiesbaden 2000.

Voeth, M. (2002), Gruppengiitermarketing - Einordnung und Konzeption, in: Marketing ZFP,

24. Jg., H. 2, 2002, S. 111-122.

Voeth, M. (1998), Limit Conjoint-Analysis - a modification of the traditional Conjoint Analy

sis, in: Andersson, P. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 27th EMAC Conference "Marketing

Research and Practice", Marketing Research (Bd. 5), Stockholm 1998, S. 315-331.

Voeth, M./Hahn, C. (1998), Limit Conjoint Analyse, in: Marketing ZFP, H. 2, 1998, S. 119-

132.

von Thaden, C. (2002), Conjoint-Analyse mit vielen Merkmalen: Monte Carlo-Untersuchung

einer gebruckten Conjoint-Analyse, Frankfurt am Main u.a. 2002.

Vriens, M. (1995), Conjoint Analysis in Marketing, Groningen 1995.

Vriens, M. (2001), Market Segmentation - Analytical Developments and Application Guide

lines, 2001.

Vriens, M. et al. (1998), Verbal versus Realistic Pictorial Representations in Conjoint-

Analysis with Design Attributes, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.

15, 1998, S. 455-467.

245

Vriens, M./Oppewal, H./Wedel, M. (1998), Ratings-based versus choice-based latent class

conjoint models - An empirical comparison, in: Journal of the Market Research Society,

Vol. 40, No. 3, 1998, S. 237-249.

Vriens, MJWedel, M./Wilms, T. (1992), Segmentation Methods for Metric Conjoint Analysis:

A Monte Carlo Comparison, 1992.

Vriens, M./Wedel, M./Wilms, T. (1996), Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo

comparison, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, 1996, S. 73-85.

Wallsten, T.S./Barton, C. (1982), Processing probabilistic multidimensional information for

decisions, in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,

Vol.8, 1982, S. 361-384.

Webster, F.E./Wind, Y.J. (1972), Organizational Buying Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

1972.

Wedel, M./DeSarbo, W.S. (1994), A Review of Recent Developments in Latent Regression

Models, in: Bagozzi, R.P. (Hrsg.), Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Cam

bridge 1994, S. 353-388.

Wedel, M./Kamakura, W. (2000), Market Segmentation. Conceptual and Methodological

Foundations, Boston u.a. 2000.

Wedel, M. et al. (1999), Discrete and Continuous Representations of Unobserved Heterogene

ity in Choice Modeling, in: Marketing Letters, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1999, S. 219-232.

Wedel, M./Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (1991), A Clusterwise Regression Method for Simultaneous

Fuzzy Market Structuring and Benefit Segmentation, in: Journal of Marketing Research,

Vol. 28, No. 4, 1991, S. 385-396.

Weiber, R./Rosendahl, T. (1997), Anwendungsprobleme der Conjoint-Analyse, in: Marketing

ZFP, H. 2, 1997, S. 107-118.

Weinberg, P. (1981), Das Entscheidungsverhalten der Konsumenten, Paderbom u.a. 1981.

Weisenfeld, U. (1989), Die Einfliisse von Verfahrensvariationen und der Art des Kaufent-

scheidungsprozesses auf die Reliabilitat der Ergebnisse der Conjoint Analyse, Berlin

1989.

Weiss, P.A. (1992), Die Kompetenz von Systemanbietem: ein neuer Ansatz im Marketing fiir

Systemtechnologien, Berlin 1992.

Wertenbroch, K./Skiera, B. (2002), Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of

Purchase, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, 2002, S. 228-241.

Wesley, J.J./Bonoma, T.V (1981), The Buying Center: Structure and Interaction Patterns, in:

Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, 1981, S. 143-156.

Wefiner, K. (1988), Prognoseverfahren als Instrumente zur Absicherung strategischer Marke-

tingentscheidungen, in: Jahrbuch der Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, No. 3, 1988, S.

208-234.

Wiley, J.B./Low, J.T. (1983), A Monte Carlo simulation study of two approaches for aggregat

ing conjoint data, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, 1983, S. 405-416.

Wiswede, G. (2000), Psychologic im Wirtschaftsleben, 3. Aufl., Stuttgart 2000.

246

Wittink, D./Cattin, P. (1981), Alternative Estimation Methods for Conjoint Analysis: A Monte

Carlo Study, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, S. 101-106.

Wittink, D./Vriens, M./Burhenne, W. (1994), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe:

Results and Critical Reflections, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.

11,1994,8.41-52.

Wittink, D.R./Bergestuen, T. (2001), Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis, in: Armstrong, J.S.

(Hrsg.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, Bos

ton u.a. 2001, S. 147-167.

Wittink, D.RJCattin, P. (1989), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update, in: Journal

of Marketing, Vol. 53, 1989, S. 91-96.

Wittink D.RJKrishnamurthi, L/Reibstein, D.J. (1989), The Effect of Differences in the Num

ber of Attribute Levels on Conjoint Results, in: Marketing Letters, No. 1, 1989, S. 113-

123.

Wittink, D.R./McLauchlan, W.G./Seetharaman, P.B. (1997), Solving the Number-of-Attribute-Levels Problem in Conjoint Analysis, in: Sawtooth (Hrsg.), Sawtooth Soft

ware Conference Proceedings, Sequim 1997, S. 227 - 240.

Wittink, D.R./Montgomery, D.B. (1979), Predictive Validity of Trade-Off Analysis for Alter

native Segmentation Schemes, in: Beckwith, N.et al (Hrsg.), 1979 Educators' Confer

ence Proceedings, Chicago 1979, S. 69-73.

Wittink, D.R. et al. (1989), Conjoint Reliability Measures, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 8, No.

4, 1989, S. 371-374.

Wong, J.K./Sheth, J.N. (1985), Explaining Intention - Behavior Discrepancy: A Paradigm, in:

Hirschman, E.C./Holbrook, M.B. (Hrsg.), Advances in Consumer Research, Provo 1985,

5. 378-384.

Wright, P. (1974), The hasard decision maker: Time pressures, distraction, and the use of evi

dence, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, 1974, S. 555-561.

Young, M.R./Lenk, P.J. (1998), Hierarchical Bayes methods for multifactor model estimation

and portfolio selection, in: Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 11, 1998, S. SI 11-S124.

Zacharias, R. (1998), Was ist dem Kunden die Leistung wert?, in: absatzwirtschaft, Vol. 40,

1998, S. 102-105.

Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985), Measuring the Involvement Construct, in: Journal of Consumer

Research, Vol. 12, 1985, S. 341-352.

Zakay, D. (1985), Post-decisional confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process, in:

Acta Psychologica, Vol. 58, 1985, S. 75-80.

Zeithaml, V.A. (1988), Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End

Model and Sythesis of Evidence, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, 1988, S. 2-

22.

Zwerina, K. (1997), Discrete Choice Experiments in Marketing, Heidelberg, New York 1997.

247

Literaturverzeichnis - Springer Link

Documents

Transcript of Literaturverzeichnis - Springer Link