Kyrgyzstan Mining Industry: New Legislative Changes for Development (2010, English)
Transcript of Kyrgyzstan Mining Industry: New Legislative Changes for Development (2010, English)
Project Finance2 0 1 0 | D I G I T A L G U I D E
E X E C U T I V E V I E W M E D I A L I M I T E D
Edited by Oliver Hargreaves
shaping boardroom strategiese x e c u t i v e v i e w . c o m
w w w . e x e c u t i v e v i e w . c o m
shaping boardroom strategiese x e c u t i v e v i e w . c o m
A B O U T T H I S D I G I T A L G U I D E
This interactive Digital Guide has clickable hyperlinks throughout the document to improve your reading experience.
Internal hyperlinks are provided to help with navigation. On the Contents pages, you can click on a headline to jump directly to
that article. At the bottom of each page in the document is a ‘Return to Contents’ button, which takes you
back to the first Contents page.
You will also find external hyperlinks at the end of each article, which allow you to find out more information about an
author and their company. These hyperlinks will automatically open a window in your internet browser, and take you to the
corresponding profile on www.executiveview.com.
NOTE: To get the most from this document, please download the PDF to your desktop and open it with Acrobat Reader. Some
functions may not operate as intended if you view the PDF within an internet browser.
E X E C U T I V E V I E W M E D I A L I M I T E Dw w w . e x e c u t i v e v i e w . c o m
Project Finance
2 0 1 0 | D I G I T A L G U I D E
Editor | Oliver HargreavesPublished in the United Kingdomby Executive View Media Limited
29th Floor, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf London, E14 5DY, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 207 712 1779
© 2010 Executive View Media LimitedISBN: 978-1-907420-08-5
© Contributors to this Digital Guide retain copyright of their works, herein published under licence.
The information provided in this publication represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily their firms. Information should not be considered as legal or financial advice, which should always be sought
independently. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein.
Unauthorised reproduction of this publication, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.Requests for reprint material should be
sent to [email protected]
1
C O N T R I B U T I N G F I R M S
Aelex
Baker & McKenzie
Carey y Cía
CMS Cameron McKenna
DLA Piper
Felsberg, Pedretti, Mannrich e Aidar
Hogan Lovells LLP
Kalikova & Associates
M&P Bernitsas Law Offices
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados
Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados
Norton Rose
Pinheiro Neto Advogados
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Veirano Advogados
Webber Wentzel
Contents | www.executiveview.com
2
1 | G L O B A L
Global _________________________________________________________________________________ 5
Financing LNG Regasification Facilities _______________________________________________5
2 | A M E R I C A S
Brazil _________________________________________________________________________________ 9
Creation and Enforcement of Security Interests in Brazil ____________________________________9
Negotiating Project Finance Deals with the Brazilian Development Bank ________________________ 11
The Challenges of Infrastructure and the Trends of Project Finance in Brazil _____________________ 14
Financing Energy Projects in Brazil: Political and Regulatory Risks ____________________________ 19
Recent Trends in Project Financing in Brazil: What Mechanisms are Companies Using to Fund their
Projects when Project Finance is Difficult to Obtain? ___________________________________ 21
Step-in Rights in Brazilian Energy Project Finance _______________________________________24
Structuring Security Packages for Brazilian Project Finance _________________________________ 27
Venezuela ____________________________________________________________________________ 31
Project Finance Issues in Venezuelan Natural Resources Projects _____________________________ 31
Impact of Exchange Control Regulations on Project Finance in Venezuela _______________________33
Chile _________________________________________________________________________________ 36
Project Finance Trends in Chile ____________________________________________________36
3 | E U R O P E
Portugal ______________________________________________________________________________ 40
The Increasing use in Portugal of Bond Placement with banks as an Alternative to Traditional Credit
Facilities – Advantages of this Type of Structure ______________________________________40
Portugal’s Hospital PPP Programme: Challenges and Difficulties in Coordinating Clinical Services with
Infrastructure ______________________________________________________________43
The Effects of the Financial Crisis on the Portuguese Project Finance Market _____________________46
Greece _______________________________________________________________________________ 49
Greek PPPs: A Sponsor’s “Survival Guide” _____________________________________________49
RETURN TO CONTENTS
www.executiveview.com | Contents
3
Hungary ______________________________________________________________________________ 52
Insolvency Law Issues in Project Finance Transactions in Hungary ____________________________ 52
Ukraine ______________________________________________________________________________ 56
Legal Framework for PPPs in Ukraine ________________________________________________ 56
Ukraine: PPP Environment Overview ________________________________________________ 59
4 | A S I A P A C I F I C
Singapore ____________________________________________________________________________ 64
Singapore’s Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Programme - Developments and Future _________64
5 | M I D D L E E A S T
Middle East ___________________________________________________________________________ 68
The Outlook for Middle East Infrastructure Financing ____________________________________68
Middle East PPP – How and Where will the Money Come From? _____________________________70
IWPP Financings in 2010 – Moving Forward from the Global Financial Crisis ____________________ 72
Abu Dhabi ____________________________________________________________________________ 76
Mafraq-Ghweifat Highway Project – Paving the Way for Future Regional Infrastructure Projects _______ 76
Kyrgyzstan ____________________________________________________________________________ 79
Kyrgyzstan Mining Industry: New Legislative Changes for Development ________________________ 79
Kyrgyzstan’s Electric Power Sector: Investment Potential __________________________________82
6 | A F R I C A
South Africa ___________________________________________________________________________ 86
An Overview of the South African Public Private Partnership Regulatory Framework ________________86
Nigeria _______________________________________________________________________________ 89
Structures in Nigeria for Lenders in Control of the Project __________________________________89
RETURN TO CONTENTS
www.executiveview.com | Kyrgyzstan
79
Kyrgyzstan Mining Industry: New Legislative Changes for Development
BY MURAT MADYKOV | KALIKOVA & ASSOCIATES
After facing significant challenges for many years, the economy of the Kyrgyz Republic is at a turning point. There
are reasons to expect a big step in the country’s development, rather than slow growth. At the moment, there are
crucial changes in almost all spheres of the state regulation system, including: (i) reorganisation of the Central
Government; (ii) strengthening the taxation and pricing system; and (iii) privatisation of strategic assets in the
electric energy sector and telecommunications.
Reforms in the mining industry are a key part of the current developments. The implementation of the reforms
will be based on proposed new laws and regulations – among which are mining concession laws, subsoil use and
protection laws, law on production sharing, and amendments to the existing tax and land codes. Currently these
laws are only at the discussion stage, however, the concept behind them is likely to remain and the laws will be
adopted and enter into force in 2010.
Ministry of Natural Resources
The central authority responsible for the upcoming major changes in the mining industry in the Kyrgyz Republic
is the Ministry of the Natural Resources (the “Ministry”), the new structure absorbed the powers of a number of
authorities including the former State Geology Agency, Environmental Agency, State Registrar, State Inspectorate
of Industrial Safety and Mining Supervision, and others. Pursuant to the recently adopted Regulation No. 734
on the Ministry dated December 4, 2009, the Ministry is entitled to maintain the state policy in various spheres
including subsoil use, cartographic and geodetic service, supervision over the use and protection of land, allocation
of water, industrial safety, environmental protection with regard to the exploration and mining projects, and fuel
resources policy.
According to the Regulation, the duties of the Ministry, among other, are as follows:
• issuance, suspension and revocation of licences for use of natural resources;
• issuance, suspension and revocation of licences for designing and use of hazardous industrial facilities,
blasting permits, certificates for obtaining and storage of explosives;
• issuance of opinions with regard to conversion of lands from one category to another;
• organisation of state reserve of the lands of mineral resources deposits and management thereof;
• expert review and issuance of expert opinions with respect to compliance of the construction, exploration
and mining project to the technical, environmental safety and subsoil protection requirements.
K Y R G Y Z S T A N
RETURN TO CONTENTS
Kyrgyzstan | www.executiveview.com
80
Once a licence is obtained, companies are required to elaborate a technical project of exploration or mining works
and agree it with various state authorities. Previously these powers were vested in different state bodies and
companies were required to knock on many doors to obtain approvals for exploration and mining works and
documentation. Now, as it can be concluded upon review of the powers of the Ministry, the procedure of obtaining
such approvals becomes easier as the Ministry is able to deal with the mining safety and environmental protection
matters.
Obtaining Mining Rights
In contrast to the previous regimes, the procedure for obtaining exploration and mining rights will change and
become more flexible to allow companies to choose the most appropriate regime under which exploration and
mining rights are granted. Currently, absolute majority of exploration and mining rights are granted through a
licence issued upon direct negotiations with the Ministry except for the rights to deposits of “state significance”,
which are granted through competitions.
Working under licence means that companies are required on a regular basis to apply for licence extension,
strictly follow licensing requirements which might be too general and not preferable for their individual needs.
In most cases, small failures to meet licensing terms could lead to disproportionate punishment in the form of
revocation of the licence by the Ministry.
As for the general licensing regime, the proposed draft laws stick to a more transparent procedure providing
for issuance of a licence on a “first come first served” basis. This approach, in comparison to the direct negotiations
which seem rather covert and known only to insiders, will eliminate future disputes on the validity of rights.
Moreover, the draft laws stipulate that if a licence holder does not fulfil the licensing terms, the licence can be
revoked only by court decision.
Should the proposed changes become effective, companies will have a choice to either obtain a licence or
enter into more negotiable concession or production sharing agreements. As opposed to licensing, concession and
production sharing agreement regimes will allow companies to negotiate with the state individual terms that meet
the companies’ needs. This may be achieved through favourable or discounted tax treatment, legislation stability
clauses and longer mining rights validity periods. In order to ensure obtaining the additional permits and smooth
operation of the company in the future, such agreements may provide for the obligation of the licensor to assist
in resolving the issues with the state and local authorities. Additionally, in order to avoid the state courts, the
concession or production sharing agreement can provide for the jurisdiction of international arbitration courts if
any legal disputes occur.
In addition to the new draft laws, the Kyrgyz laws provide the investors operating in the mining industry with
another option. This option can be realised through the public-private partnership, another new mechanism for
investment offered by the Law on Public-Private Partnership No. 154 dated May 11, 2009. The advantages of
the public-private partnership agreement are similar to those of concession and production sharing agreements,
however, the peculiarity of this regime is that it gives more freedom to investors. The latter are empowered to
stipulate in the public-private partnership agreements the provisions other than those provided in law. However
it should be taken into account that the parties may not agree on the terms contradictory to the current regulations
on:
• public security;
RETURN TO CONTENTS
www.executiveview.com | Kyrgyzstan
81
• security of the state;
• land, natural resources and environmental protection;
• healthcare;
• sanitary safety;
• military defence and mobilisation.
Transactions with Mining Rights
The proposed changes are another step towards free market relations in the mining industry. One of the significant
obstacles that companies face nowadays is a number of restrictions related to transfer and pledge of exploration
and mining rights in whole in or part. A company wishing to transfer or pledge its licence and rights granted by
such licence for the purposes of establishing a joint venture or attracting additional financing to the project must
obtain prior consent from the Ministry. The Ministry at its sole discretion may or may not consent to such transfer
or pledge. Pursuant to new draft laws, companies will have a right at their sole discretion to sell, transfer or pledge
their rights. Such actions need to be registered with the Ministry as well, as they entail payment of a bonus.
To minimise the state authorities’ interference and grant more freedom to companies, the proposed changes
introduce a number of economic tools to fight speculators who are just buying and selling licences or holding
licences for a long time without conducting any works. One of the proposed amendments is to apply bonuses
each time a licence is transferred, including when ownership in a company holding exploration or mining rights
changes. In order to encourage companies to actively explore and relinquish explored areas, the Ministry intends
to apply progressive licence fees payable per each hectare of the non-relinquished licensed area.
Surface Rights
Legal reforms will also affect current regulation of land use rights. As opposed to some of the jurisdictions, the
Ministry grants to companies only the right to explore or develop a certain part of subsoil. The relevant land
access and use rights shall be granted separately by the local authorities where licence areas are located after
companies obtain exploration and mining rights. Such local authorities are not under the control of the Ministry.
Moreover, existing land regulations contain restrictions over the land rights of foreign companies, which are the
majority among the holders of rights to the most significant deposits in the Kyrgyz Republic. For instance, if a
mining company is at least 20% owned by a foreign entity or controlled by a foreign entity in any manner, it may
obtain land use rights only by obtaining a resolution of the Central Government. This procedure may take up to
eight months and involve approvals from three to five different state agencies at different levels. This is a very
complicated process, as companies often face difficulties in dealing with local authorities. Moreover, the absence
of valid land use rights prevents companies from starting operation on the site and therefore imposes risks of
revocation of licence.
In order to minimise barriers related to obtaining land rights, the Ministry proposed changes that will enable
it to grant land use rights simultaneously when exploration and mining rights are granted. For this purpose, the
Ministry has initiated the amendments to the Land Code introducing the new type of land, the state reserve of
lands for mineral resources deposits. Currently, the Ministry is in the process of identifying the exact location of
such lands and registering them in the name of the Ministry.
RETURN TO CONTENTS
Kyrgyzstan | www.executiveview.com
82
Conclusion
It is evident that the proposed laws tend to introduce changes aimed at the improvement of the entire mining sector
of the Kyrgyz Republic. As we can see, the draft laws eliminate major difficulties that companies face under the
current legal framework as well as transform the state into the “night watchman”. The meaning of the anticipated
reforms clearly demonstrates the state’s willingness to dialogue with current and new investors for comprehensive
economic recovery in the mining industry.
Murat Madykov is a Lawyer at Kalikova & Associates.
Click here to view COMPANY profile
Kyrgyzstan’s Electric Power Sector: Investment Potential
BY MAGOMED SAADUEV | KALIKOVA & ASSOCIATES
General Data on Electric Power Sector
Kyrgyzstan (Kyrgyz Republic) is one the countries in Central Asia with enormous energy resources. The hydropower
sector is the country’s major energy source, producing 90% of total electricity. By the amount of electric power
produced at hydropower plants (“HPPs”), Kyrgyzstan is ranked third among CIS countries after Russia and
Tajikistan.
The main power production facilities were built and put into operation during the 1960 – 1980 years.
As of today, Kyrgyz electricity grid consists of:
• power producing (generating) companies (mainly, Electric Stations OJSC, owning the cascade of Toktogul
HPPs, Central Heating and Power Plants (“CHPPs”) of Bishkek and Osh cities);
• power transmitting companies (mainly, National Electric Grid of Kyrgyzstan OJSC, owning a countrywide
network of high-voltage transmission lines);
• power distributing companies (Severelectro OJSC, Vostokelectro OJSC, Oshelectro OJSC, Jalalabatelectro
OJSC, owning distribution networks in the provinces of Kyrgyzstan and supplying electricity to ultimate
consumers: industrial enterprises, the general public, etc.) and one heat distribution company –
Bishkekteploset OJSC.
All of the above power companies are controlled and owned by the state.
Aside from state-owned power companies, Kyrgyzstan has private corporations actively engaged in producing
power at small and medium HPPs such as Chakan HPP JSC, Bystrovskaya and Kalininskaya HPPs. Kyrgyz electric
power system consists of 17 electric power plants with the capacity of 3,680 MW, including 15 HPPs (2,950 MW)
and two CHPPs (730 MW) in Bishkek and Osh. Average annual power production in Kyrgyzstan is 14.486 billion
kWh. The electric power industry produces about 3.9% of GDP, 16% of industrial production volume, and 10% of
the republican budget revenue.
However, whereas Kyrgyzstan’s hydropower industry has capacity to produce about 140 billion kWh per year,
RETURN TO CONTENTS
A B O U T E X E C U T I V E V I E W M E D I A L I M I T E D
In today’s competitive business environment, the need for intelligent advice and comprehensive analysis has never been greater. Business leaders around
the world have come to rely on the guidance of intermediaries and consultants to successfully maintain a competitive advantage.
Executive View delivers unparalleled insight and comprehensive professional coverage of the issues driving the global business community. This unique
platform provides leading business advisers with a channel to publish thought leadership on issues relevant to corporate leaders around the world.
Visit us at www.executiveview.com