Endophytic fungal compounds active against Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii
Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from soybean ( Glycine max ) grown in soil...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from soybean ( Glycine max ) grown in soil...
R E S E A R C H L E T T E R
Isolationand characterizationof endophytic and rhizospherebacterial antagonists of soft rot pathogen fromPinellia ternataXiufang Hu, Qionglou Fang, Shixiao Li, Jinguang Wu & Jishuang Chen
Institute of Bioengineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
Correspondence: Jishuang Chen, Institute
of Bioengineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech
University, Road 2, Xiasha, Hangzhou
310018, China. Tel.: 186 571 8684 3200;
fax: 186 571 8684 3196; e-mail:
Received 29 August 2008; accepted 16
February 2009.
First published online 9 April 2009.
DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01558.x
Editor: Bernard Paul
Keywords
biological control; soft rot disease;
Pectobacterium carotovorum; Pinellia ternata;
endophytic and rhizosphere antagonists.
Abstract
Pinellia ternata, a traditional Chinese herb that has been used in China for over
1000 years, is susceptible to a soft rot disease, which may cause major loss of yield.
The use of bacteria as potential antagonists against Pectobacterium carotovorum
SXR1, the causal agent of the disease on P. ternata, was evaluated. Altogether, 1107
candidate bacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere and surface-sterilized plants
of P. ternata. In Petri dish tests, 55 isolates inhibited the growth of strain SXR1, and
21 of these reduced the disease development on P. ternata slices by over 50%.
Four selected antagonists significantly reduced the disease incidence on tissue
culture seedlings, and also prevented the disease on the transplants. Agonist P-Y2-2
yielded a good prevention level of 81.9%. The four antagonists rapidly colonized
the tissue culture seedlings and transplants, whereas greater populations of the
antagonists (107–109 CFU g�1 fresh tissues) were observed in the seedlings and in
the preinoculated transplants than in those inoculated during transplanting. The
use of pathogen-free tissue culture seedlings pre-inoculated with antagonist may
provide a strategy for production of P. ternata plantlets resistant to soft rot disease.
This is the first report on the efficacy of biocontrol agents against pathogens on
P. ternata.
Introduction
Pinellia ternata (Thumb.) Breit. (Araceae) is a perennial
medicinal herb that has been used in Chinese medicine for
over 1000 years (Hu & Tao, 2005). To meet increasing
demand and to protect this natural resource, P. ternata has
been cultivated on a large scale since the 1970s (Mao & Peng,
2002). However, a soft rot disease caused by Pectobacterium
carotovorum has recently been reported on cultivated
P. ternata (Hu et al., 2008). This pathogen induces water-
soaked lesions, soft rot and finally, collapse of the whole
plant. The disease generally occurs in summer and spreads
widely, causing significant loss of yield. Traditional control
measures include crop rotation, use of certified tuber seed
and healthy, noncontaminated transplants, proper disposal
of infected plant debris and application of copper or other
bactericides (Fu & Wen, 2006). However, no strategy is
currently available to completely protect this plant from
damage. Therefore, an alternative approach is needed to
protect P. ternata from soft rot disease.
Biological control, especially the use of bacteria, has been
a focus of recent research (Weller, 1988). Plant growth-
promoting rhizobacteria (Kloepper, 1983), fluorescent Pseu-
domonas strains (Altin & Bora, 2001) and antagonistic
bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere (Chard et al., 1991)
are common biological control options for controlling soft
rot pathogens. Recently, the use of endophytic bacteria as
biological control agents for soil-borne root diseases has
been of very high interest due to their ability to colonize
healthy plant tissue and produce antibiotics in situ (Hallman
et al., 1997). Several bacterial endophytes have been re-
ported to support growth and improve the health of plants,
and therefore may be important sources of biocontrol agents
(Smith et al., 2003; Kavino et al., 2007). Pectobacterium
cartovorum is inhibited by numerous endophytic bacteria,
including strains of Pseudomonas sp., Curtobacterium
luteum and Pantoea agglomerans (Sturz et al., 1999).
Although the results of these previous studies are promising,
few applicable biocontrol agents that suppress soft rot have
been identified to date. Moreover, no bacterial antagonists
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
have been reported to suppress the soft rot pathogen on
P. ternata.
Biocontrol is an emerging trend aimed at reducing
chemical input in plant production, while increasing plant
fitness, productivity and resistance to diseases in the context
of sustainable horticulture. Biocontrol measures using an-
tagonists provide the capability of preplanting protection,
which is crucial for the production of the traditional herb
P. ternata. The objective of this study was to select endophy-
tic and rhizosphere bacterial antagonists and to evaluate
their efficacy to enhance resistance against soft rot pathogen
on P. ternata.
Materials and methods
Collection of candidate antagonists
Plants and rhizosphere soil samples were collected from
healthy P. ternata and P. ternata infected by soft rot patho-
gens in Zhejiang and Shandong provinces in China. Soil
samples (5 g) were shaken in 150 mL sterile distilled water
for 1 h at 200 r.p.m. Suspensions were diluted four to six
times at a 1/10 ratio and plated on nutrient agar (NA)
medium for bacterium development. The entire plants were
washed in tap water, surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for
1 min and with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, and
finally washed three times in sterile-distilled water. The
external plants were placed on NA plates to validate the
efficacy of the sterilization procedure. Roots, tubers and
stems (including leaves) of the treated plants were separately
ground with a mortar and pestle and diluted with phosphate
saline buffer. A series of dilutions were spread onto NA
plates. After incubation at 28 1C for 48 h, morphologically
different colonies were selected as candidate antagonists.
In vitro antagonistic activity
On Petri dishes
Pectobacterium carotovorum SXR1, isolated and identified
in our previous experiments (Hu et al., 2008), was used
as the soft rot pathogen. A suspension of strain SXR1
(105 CFU mL�1) was spread on NA medium, and each of
the candidate bacteria (107 CFU mL�1) was then spot inocu-
lated as three replicates. After an incubation period of 48 h at
28 1C, antagonistic activities were evaluated by measuring
the widths of the clear zones surrounding the spot cultures.
The percentage of the efficiency was calculated using the
Abbott formula (Abbott, 1925).
On P. ternata slices
The potential antagonistic bacteria selected from Petri
dishes were tested for their ability to suppress soft rot caused
by strain SXR1 on P. ternata slices. Five pieces of P. ternata
tuber slices 15–20 mm in diameter (sterilized as above) were
placed on a moist sterile filter paper in Petri dishes, and were
inoculated with 20mL of candidate antagonist solution
(105 CFU mL�1) and 20mL of the pathogen (103 CFU mL�1).
The inoculated slices were then incubated at 28 1C. Slices
inoculated with strain SXR1 or the candidate antagonist
were used as controls. The development of the resulting
disease symptoms was evaluated 1 week after inoculation.
In vivo antagonistic activity
On tissue culture seedlings
Antagonists with over 60.0% protection of P. ternata slices
from soft rot were further tested on the 21-day-old tissue
culture seedlings. Inoculation of the antagonists was per-
formed with droplets (20 mL) of bacterial suspension
(107 CFU mL�1) deposited on each stem base of the seed-
lings in five tissue-cultured bottles, and after 24 h, strain
SXR1 (105 CFU mL�1) was drip-inoculated. Negative and
positive controls were inoculated only with sterile water and
strain SXR1, respectively. The inoculation was performed
under aseptic conditions. The seedlings were grown in a
growth chamber conditioned at 25 1C with 12 h of 3000 lux
illumination per day. The development of the disease
symptoms was evaluated at 5-day intervals.
On transplants
Antagonists with over 60.0% suppression of soft rot on
seedlings were tested on 4-week-old tissue culture plantlets
of P. ternata. The plantlets were drip-inoculated with the
antagonist, either 7 days before, or during, transplantation.
The roots of the plantlets were then dipped into the
pathogen suspension for 15 min. Sterile water and strain
SXR1 were used as negative and positive controls, respec-
tively. Five replicates of the treated plantlets were planted in
pots containing field soils; each replicate contained two
plantlets. The replicates were maintained in a climate-
controlled room at 25 1C with a humidity of 80–90%. The
development of the disease symptoms was evaluated 2 weeks
later.
Colonization of the antagonists
The colonization of antagonists was investigated on tissue
culture seedlings and the resulting transplants. The inocula-
tion procedure and growth method were similar to those of
the in vivo assay described above. The inoculation on
transplants was performed 7 days before or during trans-
planting, as five replicates. Seedlings were sampled for
population estimation at days ranging from 0.5 to 30 days
after inoculation. The roots, stems and leaves of each
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16 c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
11Biocontrol of soft rot on Pinellia ternata
treatment were collected and separately ground with a
mortar and pestle, and the resulting homogenate was serially
diluted and placed on NA plates to estimate the population
of the antagonist. Population counts were also performed
using the uninoculated controls.
The transplants were sampled 4 weeks after transplanting.
The leaves were washed in tap water, surface sterilized with
70% ethanol for 1 min and with 1% sodium hypochlorite
for 3 min and finally washed three times in sterile-distilled
water. Sterilization was validated by placing the leaves on NA
plates. The sterilized leaves were used as above to estimate
the population of the antagonist.
Evaluation and statistical analysis
The evaluation of antagonistic activity was performed using
a 0–3 scale. The scale for tuber slices was: 0 = no symptom,
1 = 0–2/5 soft rot of slice, 2 = 2/5–4/5 soft rot of slice and
3 = complete soft rot of slice. The scale for seedlings and
plants was: 0 = no symptom, 1 = water-soaked lesion on the
base of stem, 2 = water-soaked lesion on stem and leaf and
3 = collapse of plant. The percentage of the efficiency was
calculated using the Abbott formula (Abbott, 1925). The
experimental data were statistically analyzed by a t-test using
the program DPS 7.05 (Tang & Feng, 2007).
Results
Collection of candidate antagonists
Seven hundred and ninety-one bacterial isolates out of 4859
colonies were obtained from the stems, tubers and roots of
P. ternata plants, and 318 isolates out of 1805 colonies from
the rhizosphere soils. Two of the isolates proved to be
pathogenic to the tubers of P. ternata. Thus, the rest of the
total 1107 isolates (212 from stems, 382 from tubers, 196
from roots and 317 from rhizosphere) were used as candi-
date antagonists in the subsequent studies (Table 1).
In vitro antagonistic activities
On Petri dishes
The antagonistic effects of the candidates on the pathogen
SXR1 are shown in Table 1. Fifty-five out of the 1107 isolates
revealed antagonistic activity with the antibiosis 6–28 mm in
diameter, whereas the others showed little or no activity. Of
the 55 potential antagonists, 18, 14, 13 and 10 isolates were
derived from the stems, tubers, roots and rhizosphere,
respectively. The proportion of antagonists from a specific
location on the plants ranged from 3.2% to 8.5%, indicating
that the antagonists were distributed throughout the plant.
On P. ternata slices
The efficacy of several antagonists on P. ternata slices is
given in Table 1. Seven out of the 55 potential antagonists
(Y1-9, W6S1, GJ1-11, L1R2-2, P-WXS2-3, H2T3, L1-5 and
L3R2-1) strongly inhibited (100%) the disease incidence
on P. ternata slices (Fig. 1a). Antagonists H2T1, GJI-11
and Y2S5-2 resulted in a reduction of the disease ranging
from 71.4% to 82.1%. Eleven antagonists (L1S2-2, L3R3-1,
P-Y2-2, P-H2T1-2, P-Y11T3-2, Y2S3-2, GJI-8, WXS2-1,
P-H2T1-1, H2T1-2 and H2T1-3) prevented 50.0–64.3% of
slices from soft rot whereas 15 antagonists prevented disease
development at a ratio o 50.0%. The other antagonists
showed no suppression of the disease. The 21 antagonists
with 50.0% or greater disease prevention were used in the
following studies.
In vivo antagonistic activities
On tissue culture seedlings
All the tested antagonists, with the exception of H2T1-3 and
L1-5, delayed and reduced the incidence of soft rot on the
P. ternata seedlings (Table 2). Only one of the antagonists
(P-Y2-2) completely inhibited the disease. GJ1-8 and
P-Y11T3-1, the second best antagonists in this study,
reduced the disease development at ratios of 93.3% and
80.0%, respectively. Symptom development on the seedlings
was inhibited at a ratio in the range of 67.0–53.3% by
antagonists L3R3-1, P-WXS2-3 and P-H2T1-2. Seven an-
tagonists (Y2S3-2, WXS2-1, L1R2-2, P-H2T1-1, H2T1-2,
Y2S3-2 and H2T1) prevented the development of the disease
with a ratio of 46.6% or lower. No efficacy was observed for
the other antagonists 15 days after the inoculation. No
symptoms were observed on the negative control seedlings,
whereas 100.0% of the seedlings collapsed 3–4 days after
inoculation in the positive controls (Fig. 1b). The antago-
nists with 60.0% or greater antagonistic activity on the
seedlings were further tested on the transplants.
Table 1. Numbers of bacterial isolates and antagonists selected using
in vitro tests
Location
Candidate
isolates
Selected
antagonists
(ratio%) on
Petri dishes
Selected antagonists with
different scale of disease
severity on tuber slices
0 1 2 3
Endophyte
Stem 212 18 (8.5) 3 4 5 6
Tuber 382 14 (3.7) 1 6 2 5
Root 196 13 (6.6) 1 1 6 5
Rhizosphere 317 10 (3.2) 2 3 3 3
Total 1107 55 (5.0) 7 14 16 16
0 = no symptom, 1 = 0–2/5 soft rot of slice, 2 = 2/5–4/5 soft rot of slice,
3 = complete soft rot of slice.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
12 X. Hu et al.
On transplants
The effects of the four antagonists P-Y2-2, GJ1-8, L3R3-1
and P-Y11T3-1 on the transplants can be seen in Table 3 and
Fig. 1c. It is evident that the four antagonists reduced the
occurrence level of the disease on the transplants. GJ1-8,
L3R3-1 and P-Y11T3-1 provided 63.5–81.9% disease reduc-
tion on the preinoculated transplants, and 48.0–68.6% on
the transplants inoculated during transplanting. Good pro-
tection on the preinoculated transplants and on those
inoculated during transplanting (81.9% and 68.6%, respec-
tively) was achieved by P-Y2-2 in this study. No symptoms
were present on negative control plants. Higher reductive
levels of the soft rot disease were obtained on the preinocu-
lated transplants, indicating that preinoculation with the
antagonists on the transplants improved their antagonism.
Colonization of the antagonists
On tissue culture seedlings
As shown in Table 2, all the tested antagonists could readily
colonize the seedlings of P. ternata, and their populations
were maintained in the range of 106–108 CFU g�1 fresh
leaves. The population dynamics of the four antagonists
with higher efficacy (GJ1-8, P-Y11T3-1, P-Y2-2 and L3R3-1)
in the seedlings were further investigated. As shown in
Fig. 2a, colonizations were observed on the leaves of the
seedlings just 12 h postinoculation. The populations of the
antagonists gradually increased after inoculation, and the
highest populations of 108–109 CFU g�1 fresh leaves were
observed about 3 days after inoculation. The populations
then remained in the range of 107–108 CFU g�1 fresh leaves
NC(a)
(b)
(c)
T PCANC
PCT
NC A T PC
Fig. 1. Photographs showing in vitro and in vivo protection of the antagonists against the soft rot of Pinellia ternata. (a) Protection of the P. ternata
slices by the antagonists. (b) Protection of the seedlings by the antagonists. (c) Protection of the transplants by the antagonists. NC, treatment with
sterile-distilled water; T, treatment with antagonists and strain SXR1; A, treatment with antagonists only; PC, treatment with strain SXR1.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16 c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
13Biocontrol of soft rot on Pinellia ternata
over the subsequent 27 days. Comparably, the total antago-
nists recovered in the roots and tubers were significantly
higher than those in the stems and leaves 7 days after
inoculation (Fig. 2b). In fact, antagonist populations in
leaves and stems remained lower than those in tubers and
roots throughout the experiment (data not shown). No
difference in the magnitude was observed between the
populations of the rhizosphere and endophyte antagonists.
No bacteria were isolated from the control seedlings.
On transplants
Bacteria were also isolated from surface-sterilized leaves of
the transplants (Fig. 2c). The only predominant morpho-
type of the inoculated antagonists was obtained in the
preinoculated transplants with a frequency of 106–107 CFUg�1
fresh leaves. However, more than one type of predominant
bacteria, as well as lower populations (102–103 CFUg�1 fresh
leaves) of the antagonists, were observed in those transplants
inoculated during transplanting. It can be seen that antago-
nists colonized more readily under the tissue culture condi-
tions, which is likely due to the reduced possibility of
microbial competitors in the tissue culture seedlings com-
pared with the transplants inoculated during transplanting.
Discussion
The soft rot P. carotovorum is a pathogen of many plant
species, affecting crops in subtropical and temperate areas
worldwide (Toth et al., 2003). Recently, P. ternata cultivation
has been seriously affected by soft rot induced by
P. carotovorum, and the prevalence of the disease has steadily
increased year by year. About 30–90% of surveyed cultivated
Table 2. Effect of the antagonists against strain SXR1 and their colonizations on the seedlings of Pinellia ternata
Antagonists
Disease reduction (%) postinoculation (days) Populations postinoculation (107 cell g�1 fresh leaves) (days)
5 15 5 15
Rhizosphere
P-Y2-2 100.0� 0.0 100.0� 0.0 21.2�1.2 27.8�1.5
GJ1-8 93.3� 5.2 93.3� 5.2 23.6�2.2 6.4�0.2
Y1-9 63.3� 4.5 0.0� 0.0 6.7�0.5 2.1�0.1
GJ1-11 55.0� 3.1 0.0� 0.0 19.2�1.3 40.8�2.3
L1-5 0.0� 0.0 0.0� 0.0 6.2�0.3 0.6�0.0
Endophyte
Root
L3R3-1 86.7� 6.4 66.7� 5.5 30.4�1.6 14.4�1.1
L1R2-2 80.0� 4.8 26.6� 3.3 0.2�0.0 60.0�4.1
L3R2-1 18.3� 2.5 0.0� 0.0 36.5�1.7 146.0�5.3
Tuber
P-Y11T3-1 95.0� 7.5 80.0� 5.6 17.1�0.8 79.6�4.6
P-H2T1-2 86.6� 4.7 53.3� 6.2 19.0�1.0 85.1�6.2
P-H2T1-1 41.7� 3.2 20.0� 2.4 21.9�1.2 6.9�0.5
H2T1-2 23.3� 5.4 13.3� 1.5 88.0�4.5 28.5�3.7
H2T1 43.3� 3.3 6.6� 1.2 0.0�0.0 0.9�0.0
H2T3 48.3� 5.1 0.0� 0.0 0.0�0.0 0.1�0.0
H2T1-3 1.6� 1.2 0.0� 0.0 166.0�6.9 2.5�0.2
Stem
P-WXS2-3 63.3� 5.0 55.0� 4.5 0.2�0.0 1.2�0.1
Y2S3-2 73.3� 5.3 46.6� 4.7 114.0�6.9 0.8�0.0
WXS2-1 70.0� 8.1 33.3� 2.2 70.5�4.5 1.2�0.1
Y2S5-2 63.3� 3.4 0.0� 0.0 0.0�0.0 33.8�0.0
L1S2-2 60.0� 3.2 0.0� 0.0 32.0�2.2 21.1�1.6
W6S1 23.3� 1.7 0.0� 0.0 8.4�0.5 11.9�0.3
Positive control 0.0� 0.0 0.0� 0.0 0.0�0.0 0.0�0.0
Negative control 100.0� 0.0 100.0� 0.0 100.0�0.0 100.0�0.0
Table 3. Effect of the antagonists against strain SXR1 on the transplants
of Pinellia ternata
Antagonist
Disease reduction (%) on transplants
Inoculated during
transplanting Preinoculated
P-Y2-2 68.6� 3.8 81.9�5.6
L3R3-1 56.5� 2.2 69.1�3.3
P-Y11T3-1 51.7� 2.6 63.5�4.3
GJ1-8 48.0� 1.8 66.4�2.7
Positive control 0.0� 0.0
Negative control 100.0�0.0
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
14 X. Hu et al.
tubers were found to carry the pathogen, which can rapidly
cause disease symptoms when conditions are favorable (Hu
et al., 2008). The pathogenicity of P. carotovora is regulated
by quorum sensing, which is a population density-depen-
dent modulation of the bacterial phenotype (Swift et al.,
1996). Because the pathogen invades the inner part of the
plants, the conventional chemical bactericides such as
copper may not provide adequate control of the disease.
Therefore, the disease may be efficaciously inhibited by an
endophyte maintaining the pathogen population below the
level that is required for pathogenicity. In the present study,
good prevention of the disease was indeed obtained using
endophytic and rhizosphere antagonists P-Y2-2, GJ1-8,
L3R3-1 and P-Y11T3-1, which were phenotypically and
phylogenetically identified as Pantoea ananatis, Mynoides
odoratimimus, Enterobacter asburiae and Pseudomonas aeru-
ginosa, respectively (data not shown). Petri dish antagonism
does not necessarily correlate with efficacy on a plant, but
the antagonism on P. ternata tuber slices and seedlings
correlated well with the observed efficacy on this plant.
Endophytes represent a promising source of biocontrol
strains, and their use may be more successful than the use of
rhizosphere bacteria due to less competition with other
bacteria in the apoplast. Our data presented here showed
that both endophytes and rhizosphere antagonists could
become endophytically established in roots, stems and
leaves, confirming that strains could be both rhizosphere
inhabitants and tissue colonizers of hosts (Tjamos et al.,
2004). Established, thriving and stable microbial endoplant
communities may induce disease resistance through synth-
esis of structural compounds, the inhibition of bacterial
penetration, the induction and expression of general mole-
cular-based plant immunity and a simple exclusion of other
organisms by niche competition (Sturz et al., 2000). Our
results suggest that P-Y2-2, the rhizosphere antagonist,
prevented 81.9% of the P. ternata transplants from soft rot
caused by pathogen SXR1 in climate-controlled experi-
ments, indicating that it may be useful for disease manage-
ment in China. The contribution of the antagonists requires
further research using field tests.
The present study demonstrates that preinoculation of
antagonists results in a greater population in P. ternata
plantlets and a higher efficacy in preventing soft rot disease.
Nowak & Pruski (2002) found that bacterized potato plant-
lets were greener, had elevated levels of cytokinins, phenyla-
lanine ammonia-lyase, free phenolics and contained more
lignin. Upon exposure to stress, prebacterized plantlets
adapt better and faster than controls (Conrath et al., 2002).
Microbial inoculation of tissue culture plantlets may lead to
developmental and physiological changes enhancing resis-
tance to bacterial infections, which could be the reason why
enhanced antagonism was achieved in preinoculated trans-
plants compared with transplants inoculated during trans-
planting. Tubers are commonly used as seeds in the planting
of P. ternata, but they are usually infected at various levels by
soft rot pathogen (Hu et al., 2008). Because tuber seeds
containing soft rot pathogen are hazardous in P. ternata
planting, preinoculation of an antagonist in pathogen-free
seedlings via apical meristem cultures may provide a con-
venient strategy for the production of P. ternata plantlets or
tuber seeds resistant to soft rot on a large scale.
In conclusion, four endophytic and rhizosphere antago-
nists were obtained, which provided good prevention of soft
rot disease on tissue culture seedlings and subsequent trans-
plants of P. ternata. Pathogen-free seedlings preinoculated
with antagonists exhibited effective antagonism towards soft
rot. These results may provide a more environmentally sound
and economically feasible alternative to the control of soft rot
disease on P. ternata by bactericidal compounds, whose
efficacy has proven to be unsatisfactory.
Acknowledgement
This research was financially supported by the National
High Technology Research and Development Program of
China (Project No. 2006AA10Z428).
6
8
10
0.5 1 3 5 10 15 20 25 30
Days after inoculation
Log
pop
ulat
ion
of a
ntag
onis
t(c
ells
g–1
leav
es)
(a)
**** ****
** * *
5
7
9
11
P-Y11T3-1 L3R3-1 GJ1-8 P-Y2-2
Antagonist
Log
popu
latio
n of
ant
agon
ist
(cel
ls g
–1)
(b)
**
**
**
**
0
2
4
6
8
P-Y11T3-1 L3R3-1 P-Y2-2 GJ1-8
Antagonist
Log
pop
ulat
ion
of a
ntag
onis
t(c
ells
g–1
leav
es)
(c)
**
Fig. 2. Colonization of endophytic and rhizosphere antagonists on the seedlings and the resulting transplants of Pinellia ternata. (a) Populations of the
four antagonists on the seedlings of P. ternata after inoculation. (b) Populations of the four antagonists in different tissues of the seedlings 7 days after
inoculation. (c) Populations of the four antagonists in two types of inoculated plants 4 weeks post-transplanting. �P4 0.05; ��Po 0.01.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16 c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
15Biocontrol of soft rot on Pinellia ternata
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method for computing the effectiveness of
an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18: 265–267.
Altin N & Bora T (2001) Biological Control Studies by
Fluorescent Pseudomonads Against to Erwinia carotovora
subsp. carotovora Jones. Bergey et al. Caused Soft Rot on
Potato. Ninth Turkish Phytopathology Congress, 3–8 September
2001, Tekirdag, Turkey, pp. 104–110.
Chard JM, van Gardingen J & Graham DC (1991) Biological
control of Erwinia disease of potato. Biological Control of
Fungal and Bacterial Pathogens and the European Foundation
for Plant Pathology Working Group on Biological Control. New
Approaches in Biological Control of Soilborne Diseases, Vol. 30
(Jensen DF, Hockenhull J & Fokkema NJ, eds), pp. 133–135.
OILB, Avignon, France.
Conrath U, Pieterse CMJ & Mauch-Mani B (2002) Priming in
plant–pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7: 210–216.
Fu CK & Wen YG (2006) Control of major diseases and pests in
Pinellia ternata. Plant Doc 192: 22–23.
Hallman J, Quadt-Hallman A, Mahafee WF & Kloepper JW
(1997) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J
Microbiol 43: 895–914.
Hu Q & Tao SS (2005) The latest progress of study and
development on Pinellia ternata. J Southwest Univ Sci Tech 20:
63–68.
Hu XF, Ying FX, He YB, Gao YY, Chen HM & Chen JS (2008)
Characterization of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp.
carotovorum causing soft rot disease on Pinellia ternata in
China. Eur J Plant Pathol 120: 305–310.
Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Damodaran T,
Soorianathasundaram K & Samiyappan R (2007) Rhizosphere
and endophytic bacteria for induction of systemic resistance of
banana plantlets against bunchy top virus. Soil Biol Biochem
39: 1087–1098.
Kloepper JW (1983) Effect of seed piece inoculation with plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria on population of Erwinia
carotovora on potato roots and daughter tubers.
Phytopathology 73: 217–219.
Mao ZC & Peng ZS (2002) Progress on research of Pinellia
ternata. Jiangxi Sci 20: 42–46 (in Chinese).
Nowak J & Pruski K (2002) Priming tissue cultured propagules.
Low Cost Options for Tissue Culture Technology in Developing
Countries (Ahlowalia B, ed), pp. 69–81. International Atomic
Energy Agency, FAO/IAEA proceedings, Vienna.
Smith L, Keefe DO, Smith M & Hamill S (2003) The benefits of
applying rhizobacteria to tissue cultured bananas. Banana
Topics Newsletter 33: 1–4.
Sturz AV, Christie BR, Matheson BG, Arsenault WJ & Buchanan
NA (1999) Endophytic bacterial communities in the
periderm of potato tubers and their potential to improve
resistance to soil-borne plant pathogens. Plant Pathol 48:
360–369.
Sturz AV, Christie BR & Nowak J (2000) Bacterial endophytes:
potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop
production. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19: 1–30.
Swift S, Throup JP, Williams P, Salmond GP & Stewart GS (1996)
Quorum sensing: a population-density component in the
determination of bacterial phenotype. Trends Biochem Sci 21:
214–219.
Tang QY & Feng MG (2007) DPS Data Processing System:
Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis, and Data Mining.
Science Press, Beijing.
Tjamos EC, Tsitsigiannis DI, Tjamos SE, Antoniou PP &
Katinakis P (2004) Selection and screening of endorhizosphere
bacteria from solarized soils as bioncontrol agents against
Verticillium dahliae of solanaceous hosts. Eur J Plant Pathol
110: 35–44.
Toth IK, Bell KS, Holeva MC & Birch PRJ (2003) Soft rot
Erwiniae: from genes to genomes. Mol Plant Pathol 4:
17–30.
Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant
pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Ann Rev
Phytopathol 26: 379–407.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 295 (2009) 10–16c� 2009 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
16 X. Hu et al.