Induction of Molecular Organization of Oligomers by Low-Energy Electrons
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Induction of Molecular Organization of Oligomers by Low-Energy Electrons
Communication
634
Induction of Molecular Organization ofOligomers by Low-Energy Electronsa
Yiu-Ting Richard Lau, Lu-Tao Weng, Kai-Mo Ng, Manuel Kempf,Volker Altstadt, Jerold M. Schultz, Chi-Ming Chan*
We reveal that a beam of low-energy electrons (18 eV) can directly trigger long-rangemolecular ordering of an amorphous, semi-flexible oligomer in a few minutes without theprerequisite of pre-orientation. A strong endothermic transition was detected with a micro-thermal analyzer on the areas that had been exposed to the electron irradiation while theareas that were shielded from the irradiation by a protective mask remained amorphous asusual. This result suggests that long-range molecular ordering only developsin the area of the oligomer film underelectron irradiation. This is the first-timeeffort to use electron irradiation to con-trol the long-range ordering of an amor-phous organic thin film above the glasstransition temperature.
C.-M. Chan, Y.T. R. LauDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, HongKong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay,Hong KongE-mail: [email protected]. T. WengMaterials Characterization and Preparation Facility, Hong KongUniversity of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, HongKongK. M. NgAdvanced Engineering Materials Facility, Hong Kong University ofScience and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong KongM. Kempf, V. AltstadtDepartment of Polymer Engineering, University of Bayreuth,Universitatsstrasse 30, D-95440 Bayreuth, GermanyJ. M. SchultzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware,Newark, DE 19716, USA
a : Supporting information for this article is available at the bottomof the article’s abstract page, which can be accessed from thejournal’s homepage at http://www.mrc-journal.de, or from theauthor.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Introduction
Many solutions have been developed to align and order
molecules and functional moieties of organic materials at
different length scales. These solutions have used mechan-
ical,[1] thermal,[2] chemical,[3] photochromic,[4] electrical,[5]
and magnetic[6] methods and one has utilized a nanop-
robe.[7] Other indirect methods require an anisotropic
surface as a director for post-alignment ofmolecules on the
top of a substrate. The surface layer can be highly
oriented,[8] groove-patterned[9] or structurally modified
with various orientation techniques.[10]
It isaknownfact thatpositive ionsorelectrons,whichare
destructive, especially at kinetic energyofKeV, candisplace
or even ionize atoms.[11] Under irradiation, the generation
of vacancies and point defects by primary knock-on of the
atoms can induce either crystalline-to-amorphous or
amorphous-to-crystalline phase transformation. The com-
petition between lattice damage and lattice reordering
assisted by defect formation and migration governs
the direction of the phase transformation whereby the
lattice reordering is a thermal process, i.e. it is temperature
DOI: 10.1002/marc.200900730
Induction of Molecular Organization of Oligomers by Low-Energy Electrons
dependent.[11] Normally, organic molecules undergo che-
mical degradation via chain scission, radical formation and
crosslinking under high-energy irradiation, although it is
true that the amorphous phases and the structural defects
of the crystalline phases are more susceptible to degrada-
tion.[12] Amorphization and retarded crystal growth rates
are the natural and irreversible consequences of the
exposure to high doses of irradiation.[12] One research
group[13] utilized a directional low-energy ion beam (70–
300 eV) to fabricateanisotropic carbonaceous surfaces, such
as polyimides, with statistically significant orientation
order of phenyl rings by selective destruction of the rings
with planes normal to the beam direction and not of those
with planes parallel to the beam direction; yet, the virgin
surfaces of the polyimides were eventually converted to
hydrogenated amorphous carbon layers after ion irradia-
tion. These ion-bombarded surfaces, which gave rise to
long-range liquid crystal alignmentwith preferred orienta-
tions, were structurally disordered.
Herewe describe an entirely different outcome inwhich
low-energy electron irradiation can directly trigger long-
range molecular ordering of an amorphous, semi-flexible
oligomer in a fewminutes without the prerequisite of pre-
orientation above its glass transition temperature. A strong
endothermic transitionwas detectedwith amicro-thermal
analyzer on the areas that had been exposed to the electron
irradiation while the other areas that were shielded from
electrons by a protective mask remained amorphous as
usual. This result suggests that long-range molecular
ordering only develops in the area of the oligomer film
under electron irradiation. This is afirst study,which shows
that electron irradiation can initiate long-range ordering of
amorphous oligomeric thin films.
Experimental Part
Structural Characterization of the Oligomer
The molecular structure of (HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2 was con-
firmed with a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (Jeol EX-
400 NMR). 1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3) d¼7.25 (d, 4H), 7.12 (d, 16H),
6.86 (d,4H), 6.78 (d,16H),3.96 (t, 4H),3.92 (t, 16H),3.40 (t, 4H),1.85 (q,
4H), 1.76 (q, 20H), 1.63 (s, 24H), 1.45 (m, 24H), 1.38 (m, 24H). 13CNMR
(100MHz, CDCl3) d¼ 159.2, 156.8, 142.9, 131.3, 127.6, 125.2, 113.7,
67.9, 63.0, 41.6, 34.0, 32.8, 31.1, 29.3, 28.7, 28.1, 26.1.
Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
Static spectra and chemical images were obtained on an Ion-ToF V
spectrometer. 25-keV Biþ3 primary ions with an average pulsed
current of 0.1 pAandwith abeamsize of about 0.3mmwereused to
bombard the film surfaces. The total ion flux dosage for each
spectrum and the ion image was less than 2 � 1012 ions cm�2. The
pixel density of each ion image was 128�128.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Local Thermal Analysis (LTA)
LTA of the electron-irradiated and non-irradiated areas of a film
specimenwas performed on a TA Instruments 2990micro-thermal
analyzer. The thermal analyzer was equipped with a Thermo-
MicroscopesWollastonprobeutilizinga 5-mm-diameter platinum/
10% rhodiumwire as the sensing element. The probe temperature
was calibrated by detecting the melting of three standard
polymers: poly(oxymethylene), polyamides-6 and polyamides-66
with respect to the values taken from the conventional bulk
thermal examination using the differential scanning calorimeter
(DSC). The heating rate of the localized thermograms was
10 8C �min�1.
Results and Discussion
In the first part, we report the new finding, whereby the
low-energy electron irradiation directly enables the long-
range molecular ordering of (HBA-C8)n-FBA-(HBA-C8)n,
which is composed of three major units: aliphatic octane
(C8), bisphenol-A (HBA) and hexafluoroisopropyldiphenol
(FBA) units, with bromine as the end groups. The thermal
glass transition temperature of the (HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-
C8)2 oligomerwasmeasured tobe�2 8C (at aheating rateof10 8C �min�1) using a DSC. It is inherently an amorphous
liquid that cannot crystallizequiescently in thebulkor from
the solution in the presence of a non-solvent, such as
methanol. Intriguingly, from the conformational point of
view, these (HBA-C8)n-FBA-(HBA-C8)n molecules are fairly
flexible and do not exhibit the intrinsic features of a liquid
crystal with any planar or axial mesogens acting as
precursors to rod-like alignment under an external field.
The rigid aromatic segments of the molecules are tetra-
hedrally arranged and are regarded as ‘‘kinks’’ that are
detrimental to liquid crystalline properties.[14] Our earlier
results showed that (FBA-C8)n is anamorphous polymer.[15]
The fact that (HBA-C8)1-FBA-(HBA-C8)1 and (HBA-C8)2-FBA-
(HBA-C8)2 cannot crystallize quiescently in the bulk is due
to the presence of the FBA unit as a crystal defect, although
it helps the development of long-range ordering under
electron beam irradiation.
We follow a very simple procedure to produce a pattern
on an amorphous thin film with both disordered and
orderedphasesusingelectron irradiation.Ourobjective is to
obtain a comparison of the chemical structures and
morphology between the ordered and disordered phases
on the same specimen. First, we dissolved the oligomer of
(HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2 in dichloromethane at a concen-
tration of 40mg �mL�1. An amorphous filmwas formed by
spin-coating 40mL of the solution at a speed of 4 000 rpmon
a 6� 6mm2 SiO2 substrate. The film thickness was
measured to be about 200nm with an alpha-step profil-
ometer.Wethenplacedametallicmaskwithmicro-poresof
well-defined size and shape onto the spin-coated thin film
www.mrc-journal.de 635
Y.-T. R. Lau et al.
636
on theSiO2 substrate. Then, thefilmspecimenwasplaced in
the analysis chamber of a time-of-flight secondary ion
secondary mass spectrometer (ToF-SIMS), which was
equipped with an electron flood gun. When the pressure
of the chamberwaspumpeddownto10�8 torr, thefilmwas
irradiated by an 18-eV electron beam. The electron gunwas
positioned 578 to the surface normal. It was able to deliver
electrons to a spot with a diameter of about 2.6mm. The
current density of the beam was about 1.0mA �mm�2. The
experiment was repeated with metallic masks that
afforded different micro-pore sizes. A ToF-SIMS, a LTA, a
polarized optical microscope (POM), and an atomic force
microscope (AFM) were used to characterize the irradiated
samples. POM and LTA results, as shown in Figure 1a–c,
confirmed that the low-energy electron beam triggered
molecular ordering. The areas of the films (the strips) that
were protected from the electron beam by the metallic
mask remained isotropic. Therefore, these areas did not
exhibit any birefringence under the POM and show any
detectable thermal transition on the heating scan by the
LTA.On thecontrary, theareasof thefilmthatwereexposed
to the electron beam exhibited a positive birefringence and
a thermal transition with an endothermic peak at 40 8C.Based on the sensor deflection thermogram, shown in
Figure 1c, the penetration depth of the heating probe of the
LTA at the melting transition was estimated to be about
200nm,whichmatched the film thickness. All these results
convincingly suggest that the films exhibited not only
optical anisotropybutalso long-rangemolecular orderafter
Figure 1. (a) A reflected polarized photomicrograph of a 100-mesh pspecimen that was irradiated for 30 min by a low-energy electron beapolarized photomicrograph of a 200-mesh pattern on a film speirradiated for 30 min by electrons. The insets in (a) and (b) illustraprotective masks used to stamp the corresponding pattern on theenergy electron beam. (c) Localized thermograms over the opticallyisotropic regions, respectively, in terms of the first derivative-powedeflection signals. The letters ‘‘O’’ and ‘‘D’’ in (a)–(c) representdisordered regions, respectively.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
electron irradiation. Using the samepatterning techniques,
we successfully fabricated various patterns of ordered and
disordered phases by using the low-energy electron beam
on oligomeric films with different protective masks that
offered openings with sizes from mm (for example, the
meshed grids) to evenmmscales (for example, the opening
shaped as a ‘‘3’’), as shown in Figure 2. This suggests the
versatility and the simplicity of the patterning process for
various arrangements and sizes of the ordered and
disordered phases as imprinted by the patterns on the
protective masks.
The thermal effect due to heat generation from the
inelastic collisions of the electrons with the film surface is
another possible cause of themolecular ordering. However,
if the thermal effect were a crucial factor, we would have
observed the same ordering behavior under thermal
annealing. The major issue is therefore if the induced
molecular ordering is a consequence of selective degrada-
tion of the chemical structure of the oligomers by the
electrons. It is statistically not possible that the oligomers
can be fragmented by the electron beam into many
fragments with similar structures that can undergo long-
range ordering. The fragments of the oligomers should be
relatively volatile. Heavymass losseswere expected during
the electron irradiation under an ultra-high vacuum
(below 10�8 torr). As a result, a crater would have been
created in the area that was exposed to the irradiation.
However, we did not find any crater on the surface of the
sampleafterelectron irradiation.Anothercommonresultof
attern on a filmm. (b) A reflectedcimen that waste the patternedfilm by the low-aniosotropic andr and the sensorthe ordered and
electron irradiation of polymers is the
creation of crosslinks. If created, cross-
links are defects that will hinder mole-
cular ordering.
To establish experimental support for
the absence of chemical degradation of
the oligomers after the electron irradia-
tion, surface analyses by ToF-SIMS were
performed.Toshowthat thematrixeffect
was absent, the intensity ratios between
two secondary ion species, which are
representative of the same structural
unit, were measured.[16] Figure 3 shows
the intensity ratios of both the rigid
aromatic and the flexible CH2 units of
(HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2 asa functionof
irradiation time. If chemical degradation
of the oligomers occurs, the intensities of
the higher-mass ions will diminish
while those of the fragmented, smaller-
mass ions will be increased when the
irradiation dose is increased.[17] Our
results show that the intensity ratios
remain relatively constant with irradia-
tion time, indicating that the low-energy
DOI: 10.1002/marc.200900730
Induction of Molecular Organization of Oligomers by Low-Energy Electrons
Figure 2. (a) Photomicrographs of the ‘‘3’’-shaped, 50-mesh, 400-mesh ordered (O)/ disordered (D) patterns on (HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2oligomeric films irradiated by electrons for 10 min. (b) A reflected polarized photomicrograph of the region that was embossed by the dottedsquare in (a) to confirm the existence of molecular ordering inside the ‘‘3’’. (c) An AFM phase image captured on one of the edges of ‘‘3’’separating the amorphous and the electron-induced ordered regions. (d) Chemical images of the film surfaces with various ordered/disordered patterns using the positive ion with a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 135, representing the HBA unit of the oligomer under ToF-SIMS. (e) Chemical images of the film surfaces with various ordered/disordered patterns using the positive ion with m/z of 243, representingthe FBA unit, of the oligomer under ToF-SIMS. (f) Normalized ion images of the film surfaces with various ordered/disordered patterns usingthe ratio between the intensity of the positive ion with m/z of 213 and the ion with m/z of 135, both of which represent the HBA unit of theoligomer under ToF-SIMS. As compared with the ion images in (d) and the images in (e), the images in (f) do not show any intensity contrastbetween the disordered (D) and the ordered (O) regions. This is consistent with the quantitative intensity analyses presented in Figure 3 inwhich the ordered regions were not degraded by the electron beam.
electrons did not impart any degradation on the
oligomers.
Lastly, we studied the effects of the molecular structure
on the ordering effect induced by the electron beam.
Oligomers of (HBA-C8)n-FBA-(HBA-C8)n with n¼ 1, 2 and 5
were prepared. We found that induced long-range mole-
cular ordering was observed on the oligomers with n¼ 1
and 2, but no ordering occurred on the oligomer with n¼ 5
(additional Supporting Information is provided to illustrate
the time sequence of induced ordering of an amorphous
film of the (HBA-C8)1-FBA-(HBA-C8)1 oligomer under
electron irradiation). Even at n¼ 5, the bulk glass transition
temperature of the oligomer, which was measured to be
13 8C, is still lower than the room temperature (20 8C). Thus,hindered molecular mobility is not the reason for the
absence of ordering of the oligomer. It is clear to us that the
driving forceproducedbytheelectronbeamisnotsufficient
to force the ordering of the molecules when their sizes are
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
larger. We also modified the chemical structures of the
oligomers of (HBA-C8)1-FBA-(HBA-C8)1 by substituting the
�C(CF3)2� groups in the FBA units with less polar
�C(CH3)2� groups, the structure became a (HBA-C8)1-
HBA-(HBA-C8)1 oligomer, which was a semi-crystalline
molecule.[18] On the other hand, when all the HBA units of
(HBA-C8)1-HBA-(HBA-C8)1 were replaced with the FBA
units to yield (FBA-C8)1-FBA-(FBA-C8)1, no electron-induced
ordering was observed on the amorphous films. All the
above studies have clearly concurred that a molecular
structure with a combination of the HBA and FBA
constituents bearing the specific sequence, as demon-
strated in Figure 2, is a necessity for the phenomenon to
occur. Such molecular specificity provides a clue to the
mechanism of the induced ordering phenomenon.
It is knownthat theelectricfield canbeused to induce the
conformational changes and orientation of the molecules
by the repulsion of the electronegative atoms away from
www.mrc-journal.de 637
Y.-T. R. Lau et al.
Figure 3. Structural compositional changes at the film surfaces ofthe oligomer, (HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2, monitored in-situ withstatic ToF-SIMS as a function of the electron irradiation time. Thestructural composition is quantitatively defined by, Rj/k, whereRj/k¼ (Ij/Ik)t/(Ij/Ik)t¼0. Ij and Ik denote the intensity of the selectedcharacteristic secondary ion at a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of jand k, respectively. The subscript t is the electron irradiation time.Four positive molecular ions at m/z of 91, 107, 135 and 213, andthree negative ions at m/z of 25, 73 and 211, which are charac-teristic of the HBA units of the oligomer, were selected.[16] Twoother positive ions at m/z of 83 and 85, which are characteristic ofthe aliphatic CH2 (C8) units of the oligomer, were selected.[16]
Figure 4. A proposed model to describe the mechanism of the inducedC8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2 oligomers under electron irradiation. The two CF3unit display the strongest dipole moment in the whole molecular st
638Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
the electric field.[19]Webelieve that the samemechanism is
operating in the ordering of the amorphous oligomers
underanelectronbeam.Whentheelectronbeamisdirected
to the sample, the oligomers align themselves with their
chain axesparallel to thedirectionof the electric field due to
coupling between the electric field and the strong dipoles of
CF3 groups of the FBA units, as shown in Figure 4. We
suspect that the electron beam activated the chain packing
of the crystalline components by the repulsionof the strong
dipoles of the CF3 groups. The electric field can induce order
in (HBA-C8)1-FBA-(HBA-C8)1 and (HBA-C8)2-FBA-(HBA-C8)2but not in (HBA-C8)5-FBA-(HBA-C8)5 because the repulsive
force is not strong enough to induce the orientation of the
oligomer as its size increases.
Conclusion
To conclude, in this contribution, we demonstrate for the
first time that we now can use a low-energy electron beam
to create long-range molecular ordering of oligomers. The
new finding offers a facile method to directly control the
ordering of an amorphous organic substrate at ambient
temperature. Fabrication of a millimeter-scaled ordered/
disordered structural pattern of an organic thin filmwith a
protectivemask takes just a fewminuteswitha low-energy
electron beam.
Acknowledgements: This work was funded by the Hong KongResearch Grants Council with the grant numbers 600405 and600408.
Received: October 8, 2009; Revised: November 25, 2009; Publishedonline: January 22, 2010; DOI: 10.1002/marc.200900730
ordering of (HBA-groups in the FBAructure.
Keywords: alignment; electron irradiation;ordering
[1] J. M. Schultz, ‘‘Polymer Crystallization:The Development of Crystalline Order inThermoplastic Polymers’’, 1st edition,Oxford University Press, New York2000, p. 113.
[2] T. R. Taylor, S. L. Arora, J. L. Fergason, Phys.Rev. Lett. 1970, 25, 722.
[3] M. Muthukumar, C. K. Ober, E. L. Thomas,Science 1997, 277, 1225.
[4] K. Ichimura, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1847.[5] [5a] J. X. Geng, E. Zhou, G. Li, J. W. Y. Lam,
B. Z. Tang, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym.Phys. 2004, 42, 1333; [5b] I. Lelidis, G.Durand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73, 672.
DOI: 10.1002/marc.200900730
Induction of Molecular Organization of Oligomers by Low-Energy Electrons
[6] T. Kawai, T. Kimura, Polymer. 2000, 41, 155.[7] K. Kimura, K. Kobayashi, H. Yamada, T. Horiuchi, K. Ishida,
K. Matsushige, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 252, 5489.[8] C. Yan, H. H. Li, J. M. Zhang, Y. Ozaki, D. Y. Shen, D. D. Yan, A. C.
Shi, S. K. Yan, Macromolecules 2006, 39, 8041.[9] Q. H. Lu, X. M. Lu, J. Yin, Z. K. Zhu, Z. G.Wang, H. Hiraoka, Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, 4635.[10] [10a] B. W. Lee, N. A. Clark, Science. 2001, 291, 2576; [10b] P. J.
Martin, Recent Pat. Mater. Sci 2008, 1, 21.[11] P. M. Ossi, ‘‘Radiation-induced Phase Transitions’’, in: Radi-
ation Effects in Solids, 1st edition, K. E. Sickafus, E. A. Kotomin,B. P. Uberuaga, Eds., Springer, Dordrecht 2007, p. 259.
[12] J. Schultz, ‘‘Polymer Materials Science’’, 1st edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey 1974, p. 104.
[13] J. Stohr, M. G. Samant, J. Luning, A. C. Callegari, P. Chaudhari,J. P. Doyle, J. A. Lacey, S. A. Lien, S. Purushothaman, J. L.Speidell, Science 2001, 292, 2299.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 634–639
� 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
[14] A. M. Donald, A. H. Windle, ‘‘Liquid Crystalline Polymers’’,1st edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992,p. 50.
[15] Y. G. Lei, Z. L. Cheung, K. M. Ng, L. Li, L. T. Weng, C. M. Chan,Polymer 2003, 44, 3883.
[16] [16a] Y. T. R. Lau, L. T. Weng, K. M. Ng, C. M. Chan, Appl. Surf.Sci. 2008, 255, 1001; [16b] L. Li, C. M. Chan, K. M. Ng, Y. G. Lei,L. T. Weng, Polymer 2001, 42, 6841.
[17] G. L. Fisher, R. E. Lakis, C. C. Davis, C. Szakal, J. G. Swadener, C. J.Wetteland, N. Winograd, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 1330.
[18] Y. T. R. Lau, J. M. Schultz, L. T. Weng, K. M. Ng, C. M. Chan,Langmuir 2009, 25, 8263.
[19] [19a] H. J. Kreuzer, Surf. Interface Anal. 2004, 36, 372; [19b] A.Troisi, M. A. Ratner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14528;[19c] A. Yoshizawa, S. Segawa, F. Ogasawara, Chem. Mater.2005, 17, 6442; [19d] S. Chiba, A. Yoshizawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.2008, 47, 6386.
www.mrc-journal.de 639