Fbeedom Under Socialism? - Alexander Baron

Fbeedom Under Socialism?

byAlexander Baron

FREEDOM UNDER S O CIALI SM?

InfoTextManuscripts,

London, England. (Lgg6)

Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by

Staples Printers Rochester Limited

Thble OfContents

Page 1 AclotowledgmentsPage 2 TbTheReaderPage 3 WhatAreWeTizlkingAbout?Page 6 Money, ProfrtAndWealthPage 14 Socialisra MinoitiesAndWorthy CansesPage A SocialkmAndThektle Of LawPage 29 Religion,ArtsAndMediaPage 33 Acadcrnig Educaiory HealthAndMedicinePagp 39 ACloserLookAtTodoy\ SocialistsPage 50 A StraightLookAtBolshevism InPracticePage 61 MoreAbout The MediaPagp 68 MonopoQ,Marl<etingAndEmploymentPage 79 From Hell OnEarth To Pie In SlqPage 89 Race...AndTheAppeal Of FascisrnPagp 133 The FightAgainst Socialism...The Way FonvardPage 1zt0 BibliographyPage 150 Notes And Refermceshge202 Indoc

FREEDOM UNDER SOCIALISM?

Acknowledgments

This bookwas nritten over a period of several months during 1995.It startedlife as a pamphlet but, Iike many of my projects, it just "growed and growed",and this is the resull It was not written from beginning to end, and althonghI startetl with a synopsis, it soon became apparent that a lot more would haveto be added after the basic text had been completed. For this reason the astutereader may find references to apparently contemporarA events earlier on inthe text than passages towards the backwhich were completed earlier. Ihis isnot an important point but I stress it in order to avoid confusion.

This book was entirely my own idea, nobody suggested I nrite it and nobodygave me any suggestions for what to include in the text in any way, rtronn€rrshape or fom. Nevertheless, no man works in a vacuum, and there arr anumber of people I would like to thank in connection with this worlg andwithout whose invaluable assistance it would have been less complete. Thesepeople are, in no particular order: Chris R. thme, Britain,s leading Liberta-rian; Sean Gabb, Editor of Free Life; Mike Hutchinson of Prometheus Books;Michael Newland; Nick Griffini John Warburton of tle Mosley Archive; thestafl of the British Ubrary at Bloomsbury Aldnych and Holborn (SRIS) andColindale; the staffofl!'estuinster Central Reference Library; the staffof theSupreme Court Library the staff ofthe Public Record Oftice; Judith, Marjorie,Jules and Juliette at the ofricel and especially to Mark lbha for his invaluableassistance in prooling the text.

AlexanderBaron,Sydenham,London,England.

January30,1996


To The Reader

This book is about socialism, in particular, the freedom or othenvise thatwogld.be enjoyed by people tiving under it. Although it touches on the economicaspects of socialism, and although I have included a potted history of theBolsheviks, this studyis not about the pseudo-economic claptrap of socialism,nor is about the socialism of Karl Malx, or Lenin, or fuon lhotsky, or Stalin.It is not about the socialism of Chairman Mao, or Fidel Castro. It is not aboutthe dialectic, the Third Intemational, the iron law of wages, DemocraticCentralism, or any such drivel. Rather it is about the personal liberty or lackthereof you would have if you were ruled by today's socialists, in particular thepeopte who belong to the socialist workers Party, the New Communist Farry,and similar organisations.

Because race relations has for some time been one of the major issues of ourday, and has, for many years been the field in which socialism's proponents

have scored their most sipificant victories - always at the cost of the dispos-sessed majority - I have included in this book a substantial discussion of the

race problem, and a discussion of the ideologf towards which manyracrfs arrc

attracted, fascism (in one form or another) , and argued, hopefully conclusively,that fascism is the Siamese twin of socialism rather than the demonic entitywhich so many socialists truly believe they are struggling to defeat.

2


Chapter One: What Are We Thlking About?

Socialism Or Communism?

The words communism and socialism are often used interchangeably. (1)There are probably as many dilferent interpetations of each as therc aresocialists and communists. Communism, as envisaged by Kart Mam, is thelast phase of socialism and will cone about, we are told' when the ruling classhas been finally overthroum and the workers take control of society. The idealof communism envisages a world where fhere is no state and where no menrule over other men, except perhaps for purely administrative purposes.

Communism though can only come aboutwhen all power has been concen-trated in the state. It seems curious does it not that the total concentration ofpower will lead to its total abolition? But that is what many socialists appearto believe. (2)

Socialism Sounds Good

Socialism sounds good, the word has pleasing connotations; it sounds likesocial. But of course, to judge the meaning of a word from its sound is notparticularly intelligenL One might just as well argrre that the word. cyanidesounds ntcer than the word glucose.

What Socialismls Not

Socialism is not organised labour. Although many members of the trades'nion moyement often refer to themselves as socialists, and nany endorse


certain appanent aspects ofsocialist policy, eg nationalised industries, it is anenormous misconception to lump the trades unions altogether as socialist. Thetrades union movement grw out of the struggle of working men to inprovetheir lot at a time when pay, conditions of work, and conditions of life for thevast majority of ordinary working people were indescribably hard. Onty partof this u,as due to social reasons, eg the class systeml most of itwas simply thatprcvious generations did not live in such a highly advanced society based as isours on science, technologr, nass production and. mass consumption.

Who Are The Socialists' Leaders?

It is very noticeable that although the roots of the trades union movementare deeply working class, the socialist movement was, and remains, largely theresult of the hair-brained schemes of intellectuals. KarI Marxwas an intellec-tual, as were lbotslry, Lenin and Stalin. Man spent most of his life spongingolf his wealthyfriendEngels. thotskyis a particularlyfine example ofwhatthechampions of the working class are made of. (3) He uas born in 1E79 with thename I*v Davidovich Bronstein, the son of a prosperous farmen Anti-Semites,includ:ng outright crazies, make much of thotslcy's Jewish origins; in reality,like all the other-Iews who turned to communism at the same time, Thotskyfurned his back on his Jewish origins and was fully assimilated. It is not clearif he ever did anything for a living (we will return to lbotslcy's source of incomelater). (4) Ihotslry did not becone a Bolshevik until JuIy L9l7; (9 in March1917when the Tsarnas overthrown, hewas actuallyin NewYork

totsky returned to Rtrssia, where he played a major part in the OctoberRevolution, after which the comrades, having finished murdering classenemies, started persecuting and murdering each otler, as they have done eversince. It rras Stalin though ratler than thotsky who inherited the mantle ofLenin, and in February 1929 totslry was booted out of the Soviet Union,moving successively to lirkey, trbance, Norray, and then Mexico, wtene hecontinued to rail at Stalin and denounce the betrayal ofthe Revolution. [Thisis a catch-all phrase by which the socialists blame others for their onmshortcomings. It never occurs to them tlat the revolution is alrrays betrayed;

4


wewill discuss this in greater depth in Chapter Eightl. Thotslrywas murderedby a Stalinist agent in Mexico in August 1940. On his death his oum fatherdenounced him to the slnagogue as an enemy ofJudaism and nthe curse ofhumanity". (6)

Lenin was cut hom the same cloth as Thotsliy. He was bom in 1870 andqualified as a lawyer, but if he did practice, he doesn't seem to have done muchwork eithen He was a prolific autho4 rvto, Iike his contemporary thotslry, andMam before them, wrote incredibly turgid books which no one ever seemsrcally to be able to understand. Like Thotslry, Irnin was also an advocate andpractitioner of both terror and mass murder. He died in 1924 and was madeinto a saint in all but name.

It is true that there have been occasional leading socialists/communistsfrom working class backgrounds; the British Communist Party leader HarryPollitt (1890-1960) for example, (7) but the Harry Pollitts of this world are fewand far between. The likes of Fidel Castro, Chou en-Li and Mao tse-Thngwerealsointellectuals, (8) as are most of today's leading socialists, homegroum andforcigp. For example, Vanessa Redgrave of the Workers Revolutionary Farty isan actress; the joumalist Paul Foot, a forner editor of ,SocialistWorkerristhespailm of the wealthy "kft Feet" family; thriq AIi, who was active in theInternational Manist Group in the 70s, is tle son of a millionaire Pakistanilandoumer. (9) The list goes on. Socialism is not then, the movement of thedowntrodden masses, and it never has been. Its leaders didn't learn theirsocialism in the factories of the working class worldwide, but in the universitiesof Europe and North America.


Chapter Tlvo: Money, Profit And Wealth

Socialism Is Not Charitv - 1

Charityis givingvoluntarilySocialismdoesnotinvolvegivingbuttheforcibleexpropriation of the wealth of the rich and the better off. If you arre not rich orone of the better off, this may sound like an excellent iilea. Leaving aside themoral aspects of whether it is ever right to forcibly acquire the money orproperty of one penson in order to share it with another, therc are two bigfallacies here.

1) The fallacy that taking from the rich and giving to tle poor makes the poorriclen

2) T}ie fallacy that only the rich will be plundered

The first fallacy is not immediately obvious, but writing in her ncvsletter forJuIy 15, LTI4, Ayn f,3afl 5rrmmed it up in a nutshelk "If An average houseryifestruggles with her incomprehensibly shrinking budget and sees a t5rcoon in aresplendent limousine, 5[s mightwell think f[31j1st one of his diamond cufflinks would solve all her problems. She has no way of knowing that if all thepersonal luxuries of all the tycoons were erpropriated, it would not feed herfamily-andmillions of otherrsimilarfamilies - foroneweek;andthattheentirecountrywould starye on the first moming of the week to follow. (Ihis is whathappened in Chile.)..No one tells her that higher taxes imposed on the rich(and the semi-rich) will not come out of their consrrmption expenditures, butout of their investment capital, (ie., their savings); that such taxes will meanless investment, i.e., less production, fewer jobs, higber prices for scarcergoods; and thatbythe time the rich have to lowertheir standard of living, herswill be gone, along with fter savings and her husbands job..." (1)

A stuuning example of the futilify of confrscating the capital of the rich wasthe announcement in April 195 that one of the privatised water companies(which were widely believed to have been "profiteering) was to pay out f180

6


million to customers and shareholders. Customers of NorthWestWaterwereearmarked for a rebate of$650 a year over five years. The total due to be paidout to customers was estimated at f,90 million. (2) Obviously this is good newsfor them, and if the water comp,anies had been profiteering, it is only right thattheir customers should receive such a refund. But expropriating the wealth ofthe rich on a national or international scale and doling it out would lead to allof us receiving one-olf palments. And then nothing. No investmenl Nothing.

Look at the above example. Most of us would be quite pleased to receive9650 in our pockets, gratis. But f,650 a year is less than two pence a day. If theaverage housewife were to lose two pence a day from her purse it is doubtful ifshe would even notice iL Now imagine that all the big corporations anilwealthyindividuals were subjected to forced expropriation on a much larger scale thanttratexperienced bythisvater company. Howfarwould all this moneygo? Howmuch would it put into the pockets of the housewife, the man in the strrcet thepensioner? A few pounds a day? But again, think of the other consequences:lower investment or no investment, and rising prices. kaving aside any moralconsiderations, such expropriations would result in economic disasten

AII the above thougb assumes that once the socialist goverument hasplunderedtherich itwill distributetheirmoneytotherest of us.All experieneercfutes this. One of theboasts of hard line socialists is that a socialist govern-mentwill proiileafree health service, a free this, a free that, or subsidise this,that or other selvice. Ihis sounds goodo and it is, for the minority or vestedinterest receiving the subsidy or hand-out. But if subsidies appeared out ofthin ai1, everT government woulil be able to subsidise everything and nobodywould ever have to pay for anything. In reality ofcourse everything has to bepaid fo4 and the more people nho receive a subsidy, the more have to pay forit It should be patenfly obvious that for example, a national health service oreducational system which provides health care or education for rnillions ofpeople cannot be supported by expropriating the wealth of a few super-richindividuals and corporations.

While itis onlyproperthat some services be provided,Aee, such as emeryencyhospital treatment, and firc and rescue services, it is a proven fact that manyor even most subsidies actually help the better offat the expense of the lowerpaiil.In Britainwehaveseen state subsidies offringetheaheandoperahouses.How many ordinary working people patronise the opera?


The Thagedy Of The Commons:ABriefNote

T\etragedy of the commons lies beyond the scope of this study, but the rcadershould take note ofthe following. It is a truism thatwhen a service is providedfuw to its users ,whathappens generally is that it becomes swamped. Socialistsarc fond of scofling at the profrt motive, but the prices of goods and servicesdetermine not only the profit to the capitalist but also act as a means oftransmiffing market information. Imagine what would happen if a baker wereto give auraybreadinsteadof sellingit. Ora publicanwereto give awayalcohol!Feoptewould come from far and wide for a free drink Until he ran out, or morelikelywent bankrupt This is what is known as thetragedy of the cornmonsltheanalogr usually made is of the sheep grazing on common land, and the moralis that propertywhich is not owned by some entity (not necessarilyan indiYid'ual) is quickly plundered.

The current uriter had a personal experience of the tragedy of the commonsin August 1995. On August 24, the software giant Microsoft launched its muchbypd.Wndows 95 program. As part of the promotion it sponsorcd the Tlrnesnewspaper for the day; the pal)€r was given away free with a 28 page supple-ment. (3) I left home about 9.45am and travelled into Central London spendingsome time in Westminster Central Reference Library before valking up to theBritish Library at Bloomsbury, arriving there before lpm. trbom SydenhamStation up to the British Libraryincludinglondon Bridge and CharingCrossStations, I looked into every newsagents and vendorrs stand I pas sed;theTirneswas not to be seen in one of them. Yet usually, this paper doesn't sell out.

Although this is a complex issue, emergency medical and other treahentdoes not, generally, fallwithin the remit of thetrage@ of the commons, becauseferv and far between are the people who will break their legs in order to havethe fractures treated for free, or who will set their houses ablaze in order tohave the fires put out for free. And so on.


Socialism Is Not Charity - 2

Many socialists profess - and some sincerely believe - that the state not onlyhas a duty to provide every citizen with a roof over his or her heado freeeducation,.ftee thisrfree that, and that if the state is only given enough porver,it will be able to do exactly that. Before you fall for any of this claptrap youshould bear in mind t,he words of the American politician Senator BarryGoldwaten "A govemment that is brg enougb to give you all you want is bigenough to take it all away.' (4) However many subsidies and freebies it handsout to vested interests or as bribes, surely no sensible person believes that anygovemment or any state is mone ailept at giving than taking? Let us reiterate,the government has no wealth of its own, save what is created by its citizens. Ifthe govemnent gives you something you didn't make or earn, it must, bydefinition, have taken it (forcibly) from somebody else. When socialism hasbeen established, you can expect to frnd yourself giving and giving and gwing.

One final point worth mentioning about the expropriation of the wealth ofthe rich is that this would destroy many industries overnighl For example, ifno one could afford Rolls Royce cars or erpensive jewellery e1 fe dins inexpensive restaurants, or to patronise five star hotels, all employees ofsuchenterprises would be deprived instantaneously of their livelihoods. Except fortle fewwho rcmained to service the needs of the ruling elite, of course. Therecan be no doubt that, whatever their professed beliefs, the majority of ourrulers would continue to live a privileged existence, just as thotslry did in NewYorlc (O

The RichAre NotAlwaYS A Curse

Extreme socialists exhibit an almostpathological hatredof the rich andmakeit clear that when thq come to power, anyone who doesnot worft for a living willgo up against the nearest wall. It is though a colossal fallacy that all the richare idle all the time. \{hilst it is true that the best way to make a fortune is still


to be born rich, it is not true that there are no self-made men in the modernera. Many men (and women) have built vast business empires in the secondhalf of the liventieth Century often by their own hard work and/or ingenuity.For the sake of example wewill list three here Bill Gates the softu,anewizardand founder of Microsofg (6) Virgtn group founder and CEO Richard Bran-son, probably the most recogpisable (and extrovert) of the new brand ofmultimillionairesl and Anita Roddick (and husband) founder of the BodyShop chain.

Many morc could be added to that list, and in fact the ranks of tfrie nouveauriche have long been angmented by such (at one time) unlikely 6inisn5 a5best-selling homor and other novelists; successful latyers; rock musicians;and lately, even top rank amateur sportsmen.

Most of the above are anything but idle, and indeed some of the wealthiestand most successful people's lives revolve around their worl although they doof course rcap considerable financial resards. There is though, another andfar less well lmoum function the rich serve in our society.

At one time, scientific research was the exclusive province of the rich;astronomy in particular benefited enormously from the efforts and endow-ments of wealthy amateurs, and many foundations, medical charities and theIilre, were founded by wealthy people. kt's take a brief look at this. The twogreatest telescopes ofthe pre-1850 periodwere built by private individuals. (7)Herschel - who was appointed Royal Astronomer on his discovery of Uranus -

nas a lifelong anateur astronomer. He built one. (8) The American astronomerGeorge Etlery Hale (1E68-1938), u'as financed by his father' a prosperousChicago businessman. In 1892, he met the immenselywealthy Charles TYerkeswho financed an observatory for $34'900. (9) It opened in 1897 and uas nameda1ls him. It was still the largest in the world of its kind in the late seventies.(10) Around 1908, John D. Ilooker oflos Angeles financed a telescope to theturne of S45rfi)0, enough to pay for tle milror! (11) Britain's leading popularastronomer, Fatrick Moore, has tritten that 'It would be difficult to over'esti-mate howvaluable the Hooker reflector has been to astronony." (12)

Tino incredibly wealtly nen, Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919) and John D.Rockefeller I (1&t9-1937), gave away a staggering $850 million in their life-times.Ihey funde4 among other things, education, libraries, and scientificresearch. (ffi)

10


Although scientific research is today carried out on a vast scale and issupported largely by govemments and multinational corporations, manycampaigning organisations - including charities, civil liberties organisations,potitical and otherpressure groups, environmentalist organisations and so on- owe their very existence to the rich.

Many such organisations have diametrically opposing aims: for example,the primary concem of ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) is to stop peoplesmoking Dy wft atevermeans necessatywhile FOREST is dedicated to preservingsmokers'rights. (14) Under socialism, with thewealth ofthe rich expropriatedand the finances of all large corlorations under state control, no organisationwhich the state objected to would have the wherewithal to campaign on behalfofany cause, or against any laq ofwhich the state disapproved. (15)

One tinal case of philanthropy desenes mentioning here. In October 1995,the fonner (and future!) heavyweight champion of the world Lcnnox Isrisfonnded a college in London with a donation of a million pounds. Lenis hasmade a tidy sum out of boxing but nowhere near as much - to ilate - as manyheavyrveights. Such a donation nas a truly mapificent gesture by an exemplarysportsmen and one ofboxing's genuine nice guys. (16) According to socialistdogma, Lennox Lewis is another capitalist parasite, exploiter and member ofthe ruling class, and the fact that he has a black skinwon't save him come therevolution. One might also ask how much money Lewis would have had achance to accumulate under an "anti-ratist", socialist dictatorship? Far lessthan he has made under our supposedly, inherentlyracist capitalist system.

On the subject of the rich and social change, it is important to rememberthat throughout history social change, be it for good or ill, has been largelythework of dyramic minorities. Every movement or ideologr that has ever existedstarted, by defrnition, as a minority, and very few of those minorities were everpopular in the first instance. A classic example is the church. Christians werepersecuGd for centuries, and in tum, they persecuted both outsiders - eg Jews- and dissenters, including heretics. Throughout history slavery has beenconsidered the norm by many societiesl if socialism had been established inthe 18th Century, slavery might still be practised now. Another unpopularcause was women's suffrage. IIow nany rights would women have had if worldsocialism had been established a hunfued years ago?

Manysocialists argue that socialism has always supported such supposedlyprogressive causes as women's rights and opposition to all fomls of discrimi-

L1


nation. Ihis is sinply not true. Ihe reader should always be careful to draw adistinction between the rhetoric of socialism: human equality, the brotherhoodof man, helping the doumtrodden, etc, and the reality. Later in this short studywe will review the antecedents of tle three leading socialists of the BolshevikRevolution: knin, Stalin anil Tbotsky, when the readerwill see for himselfjusthowwide is the gap between socialist rhetoric and socialist r€ality.

Wthout the rich, all patronage, whether it be patronage of the causes listedabove, or of the arts' or whatever, would emanate entirely and only from thestate. Again, this would mean that any activity or cause the state disapprovedof would never receive a penny of public money' and would probably beproscrihd by law. As throughout history the state has disapproved of or evenoutlawed virtually everything, (17) this would mean, to all intents and pur-poses, the end of change, and the end of progress. (18)

In conclusion, the existence of a certain number of independent' wealthypeoplewho are prepared to donate theirmoney and otherresources tovariousworthy, even lnpopular, canpaips, ensunes fhat a certain amount of dissentwill always exist, the sort of dissent which is totally impossible rvhen rYealth isconcentrated entirely in the state. There is though a subtle, if terdble, ironyhere. This is that very many of the organisations which wealthy people havefounded have themselves become vehicles for socialist ideologr, and the de-struction of capitalism and free enterprise. (19) It remains to be seen if theneasons for this are wholly or partly conspiratorial, or entirely of misguidedidealism. (20)

S ocialism And Financial Reform

The fact that socialism has no answers doesn't mean that tle capitalistsystem has no inadequacies; capitalism is far from perfect' and has manyfaults, the nost important of which is the means by which the [anking systen'a privately-oumed cartel, creates credit er nihilo and. sells it to private enter'prise, the govemment and tle rest of us. It is, though, mor.3 than a little

significant that socialism has never attacked the financial system as such, andhas little or nothing to say about the evils of usury. As with ever;ithing else, tle

12


panacea for all ills is seen as tle nationalisation of the means of production'

in this case the banks. Ihe nationalisation of the banking system would simply

transfer the monopoly of credit - and the creation of ilebt - fron the private

sector to the state, which is no solution at all' (21)

SocialismAnd The Profit Motive

Hard line socialists make much of the profit motive, some of them talk about

p"ontr as though theywere evil. Profrteering at the expense of someone in dire

ieed is """trioty

evii. fio take an extraordinarT hypothetical example, if you

wene a diabetic, and were stranded miles from anywhere and you needed a shot

oriorotio, it would be evil for a doctor to demand that you hand over your life

,""t"gr uJ tneprice of an injection or die. On the other hand, mostpeoplethink

doctors should be rewarded and rewariledwell for treating the sick' Socialists

themselves often campaign - sometimes sincerel$ more often cynically'for

n.tt "

puy and conditions for all medical (and other) workers. Surely this

means that they are in some measure in favour of protit?

Major Dougtas, thefoundingfather of social creditwrote that "Ithas never

5"en ilear to-me why any man in any position of tife should be expected to

p""to"- *Vactionwlateverwhich u'as n otin some sense of thewordprolitable

io him..." (jZ) O" tn. other hand, Leon thotsky, the doyen of the intemationa-

iirt I"ft, ,*, iotally against the very concept of profit and the profit motive.

He wrote: "In a country where the sole employer is the state, opposition

means death by slow starvation. The old principle: who does not work shall not

eaf has been replaced by a nerv ons who'does not obey shall not eaL" (23)

ile doesn't teU us whom we are to obey, but it doesn't take much effort to

work that one out. Most people would rather work to eat than be subjected to

thewhims of a monsterlike Tbotslry.

t3


Chapter Three: Socialism, MinoritiesAndWorthyCauses

Socialisrr The Class StruggleAndThe First Casualff

Ihemostimportanttenet of socialistiileoloryis that of the class struggle Itwas Marx and Engels who claimed the credit for the class struggle; they didn'tclaim to have invented it merely to have discovered it. In reality this conceptdates back to at least 1M4 when it was expoundetl by the Chartist LeaderFeargus O'Connor. (1) Likervise the slogan for which Man has become re'noumed, "lforkers of the world uniten, (2) was purloined from the Gennanradical Karl Schapper. (3)

Ihe analysis ofthe world as class versus class, oppressed versus oppressor,is not merely an oversimplification, it is dead nrong. The distinguished liberalprofessoq Carroll Qulgtey, made an accurate and quite devastating analysisof Marxism imhis magnum opus, TiagedyAnd Hope.I propose here to quote

at length from this bookAt the beginning of the section on the intemational socialist movement

Professor Quigley tells us that 'Industrialism, especially in its early Y€Nrbrought with it social and economic conditions which were admittedly hor-rible...Crowded together inrv:ant and disease, with no leisure and no security'completely dependent on a weekly wage which was less than a pittance, [la-bourersl worked twelve to fifteen hours a day for six days in the week amongilusty and dangerous machines with no protection against inevitable accidents'disease, or old age, and returned at nigbt to crowded rooms without adequatefood and lacking light, frresh air, heat, pure water, or sanitation-' (4) This is

something which is largely forgotten today, the socialist movement was, Pro-

fessor Quigley tells us, na rrcaction against these deplorable conditions of the

working masses.' (5)

14


Furthermore, 'Maxist theory did not provide a realistic orworkable picture

of social and economic developments. Ithad no real provision for laborunions,for workers' political parties, for bourgeois reformers, for rising standards ofliving or for nationalism, yet these became, after Marx's death, the dominantconcerns of theworking class." (6)

Ihere are nany other developments as well utich Marx did not, and in allfairiness could not, foresee. One of these is the franchise, which has literallyrevolutionised the concepts of lbee entel?rise, capitalism and multi'nationalcorporations, but stayingwith Quigley, the point about bourgeois reformers isparticutarly worth noting, because that alone refutes the nonsense of classstruggle which pictures the frlthy caPitalists and the workers forever at oneanotherrs throats. Ihe fact is that many capitalists and corporations haveadopted exhemely progressive policies towards their workforces. An excellentif exemplary example is the chain store Marks & Spencer. Founded just beforethe tun of the century by the partnership of Michael Marks (7) and TiomSpencer, the company is today one of tte most respected retailers in the world.

By 1903, when the parhership was registered as a private limited company'Marks and spencer had thirty-six market bazaars and shops, including threein London. Bythe 1930s when itwas already a household name, it had set upa welfare committee for staffttich still functions to this day. One companybiographer has written "In the 1930s...the company's concern for the em'ployees'welfare did not make them popular in all quarters." (8)

In 1981, Marks & Spencer donated f1'205'000 to various charities' (9)

inctuding cancer relief. It also donated to the arts and education, and spon'sorrd fashion shows. (10) The ornership of Marks & Spencer has also beenextended to its staff. The 1985 company biography by (K.K. Tse) revealed thatno less than 22000 members of staff had become shareholders through thecompany profit-sharing scheme. (11) The philosophy of Marks & Spencer isa world away from the rapacious' money'grasping capitalist parasites ofsocialist fiction. (12)

Retuming to Professor Quigley, he continues: "...the picture which Marx haddrarm of more and more numerous workers reduced to lorver and lowerstandards ofliving by fewer and fewer exploitative capitalists proved to becompletely etroneous in the more advanced industrial countries in the twen-tieth century. Instead, what occurred could be pictured as a cooperative effort

by unionized workers and. monopolizeil industry to exploit unorganized con-

15


sumers by raising prices higber and higher to provide both higbervages andhigher profrts." (13)

Most interestingly, Qniglsy sopments that "Since the Marxist ideologr andthe Manist war cries were more easily observed than the social realities theyserved to conceal, especiallywhen labor leaders sought all publicity for whatthey saiil and profound secrecy for what they did' many capitalists, someworkers, and almost all outsiders missed the new d.evelopments completelyand continuedto believethataworkers'revolutionuiias justaroundthecomer.n(r4')

While there can be no doubt that many hard core socialists continue toprofess sincerely in the class struggle, there can be no doubt either that manyof them have long been aware of this reality, and, as we shall see in ChapterEight, there has been a carefully concealed working alliance between radicalsocialists and monopoly capitalists throughout history.

Another point made by Professor Qurgley is the rise of the technocrat andthe separation of the oumership of capital from the management of capital'which "must lead" in the long run, to a decreasing demand for hand labor andan increasing demand for highly traineil technicians who ane managers ratherthan laborers. And, in the longer run, this process would give rise to aproductive system of such a high level of technical complexitythat it couldnolonger be run by the olurers but would have to be run by technically trainedmanagers. Moreover, the use of the corporate form of industrial organizationas a means for bringing the savings of the many into the control of a few bysales of securities to wider and wider groups of investors (including bothmanagerial and laboring groups) would lead to a separation of managementfrom ownership and to a great incrcase in the number of onmers." (15)

All this and more refutes the nonsense of Manism and the class struggle'but hard core socialists are not interested in such niceties as truth, except thehighertruth of Mamist rhetoric. It should never be forgotten that socialists arefighting the class war. In this connection one should never but never forget thefme honoured dictum of United States Senator Hiram Johnson, tlat The firstcasualtywhenwar comes is truth." (1O

All the available evidence suggests that hard core socialists are among themost prolific, brazen and shameless liars in history. Socialism is in fact anantinomian philosophy, one which maintains that its practitioners may say ordo anything on the grounds thatthe means, however terrible, will alwaysiusti$

16


the end, that of a better world. (17) \{hen we cover the history of Bolshevismthe reader will see for himself just how temible both the means and the endsof socialism are. Like any otler fom of dictatorship, including fascism, whichis literally demonised by socialists, under socialism, the state controls all themedia, at least all those media outlets that matter. This means that thesocialist state has, can, does, and will, propagate whatever lies it likes. It is noteven necessary for censorship to be applied rigorously under socialism, fhesimple fact is that under a socialist dictatorship only those people who havebeen thoroughly iniloctrinated in the party line are permitted access to themedia. Self-censorship does the rest.

Socialism And Minorities

Since the end of the SecondWorld War, and indeed before that, socialism hasmade much of the so-called struggle of minorities for emancipation andequality. This does not relate solely to ethnic minorities - in practice, allnon-whites, whether they are in a minority or not - but has been expanded inrecent years to cover all manner of, minoities, some of them very creativeindeed. The original impetus for the concer:n with minorities was the Nazipersecution of the Jews. However, there is a big difference between endingpersecution of minorities, ending state enforced discrimination against themand striving for equality of opportunity for all on the one hand, and on theother hand, gving certain minorities special privileges backed up by the fullcoercive force ofthe state. And there is an even bigger difference between tleelimination of oflicially sanctioned discrimination and the violation ofproperty rights.

17


"Racism" And Fascism - The Great Myth

The great so-called strugle by socialists against discrimination has been

reprseoted principally as the struggle againstradsm and fascism; the tend-

ency in recent years has been to btur the distinction between the two and also

to associate all (non-Marxist) foms of white nationalism with racism atd

anti-Semitism in order to delegitimise rryhite nationalism and to portray so'

cialists as valiant heroes struggting against oppression. In 1994, the South

African politician Jaap Marais hit the nail bang on the head when he wrote 'It

is stanilard leftist practice in South Africa to associate nationalism with

fascism and from there with anti-semitism, and to present this as the argUment

against which there is no argunenl' (18) He might have added that this is

stanilard leftist practice throughout the white world 'what remains of it - andindee4 probably throughout much of the non'white world as well.

Many people have fallen for this socialist-inspired claptrap, primarily

because they are iporant of the true origins of fascism, and the common roots

of fascism and socialism. Space does not pemit an extensive analysis' but

briefly the following may be stated.The aclnowledged father of fascism was not Ailolf Hitler but the ltalian

dictator Benito Mussolini (18Si:t-1945). Mussolini was actually the editor of a

socialist newspalter, and although a Nazi sympathiser, he detested Hifler. In

Gemany, fascism took on a specifrcally anti-semitic flavour, (19) but Mussoli-ni was not an anti-senite, a n'mber of Jews attained high office in the

Mussolini gover:nment, andfascism itself is not inherently anti-Semitic.Ihis is

a most important point. Mussolini was also a Zionist slmpathiser. (20)

Ihe word racism is used so loosely nowadays as to be abnost devoid ofmeaning; originatlyitmeanta beliefin innateracial differencesrwhich is surelyneither controversial nor hatefgl. Since the end of the Second World War'

socialists have exploited the Nazi persecution of the Jews, inclurling the

Holocaust -rvtatever itwas - as proof of the evils of racism, again, associatingracismwithfascism. It should never be forgotten though that the United States'

which was hardly a fascist country, fought fascism, and at the same time

enforced strictracial segregation inits Southern states. Likewise, South Africa

has never been a fascist country; Apartheid was actually a forn of socialism'

18


because it entailed state control over the market and the fixing of differentialwage rates between races. (21) Other countries which have enforced discrimi-natory practices in varying degrees - Malaysia, for example - have also beenanything but fascist

Ifsocialists wer€ sincere in their desire to build a society based on equalityof opportunity, they would oppose all state interference in race relations andcall for ttre abolition of the race industry. (22) Instead, many of them havecarved out careers for themselves meddling in the economy, calling for theimposition of racial quotas, and pushing multi-racialism (a euphemism forenforced race-mixi.g). There is no single reason for this, but again, the Nazipersecution of the Jews usually comes into the equation somewhere. CertainJewish and Zionist organisations have also entered the fray, and their incess-ant meddling and duplicity has done far more to ferment anti-Semitism thanto combat it. The unconditional hatred for Westem society, Western demo-cratic traditions and indeed Westem Man himself, which is espoused bycertain elenents of the socialist popular front needs no doc 'menting here, butit will suflice to say that many people who meddle in race relations - be theysocialists or otherwise - do so from tle most ignoble of motives. We will discussthe thonryissue of race in more detail in Chapter Tivelve.

Socialism And "Gay" Rights

A special mention should be given here to one supposedly e4ploited andoppressed minority. The homosexual minority is undoubtedly the most crea-tive of all minorities which the Socialist Intemational has chanpioned. But itwasn't always thatnay. In Weimar Germany, Marxists attacked homosexualityas a fascist perversion [It may have been this opprobrium for homosexualperversion that led Hitler to purge the homosexual Emst Roehm in the 1934T.{ight of the Long Knives"l. (23)

A standard work on homosexuality tells us that "As early as the 1920sleaders of Westem Communist parties began to float the idea that...homosex-ual activity...resulted from the decadence of capitalism in its death throes.

t9


Homosexuality was to disappear in the healthy new socieQr of the futune." (24)

In Britain, the largely communisUsocialist anti-fascist movement made upan anti-Blackshirt chant:

"Hitler and Mosley, what are they for?Thuggery buggery hatred and nar!" (25)

Itwas onlywith the emergence of the misnamedgay "rights" movementin tlelate 60s that the transformation of homosexuals came about in socialistpropaganda fron d.iseased pariahs to oppressed minority. Incredibly, theadvent of AIDS has augmented rather than diminished the polyer of thehomosexual lobby and the afrinity of socialists for queers. (26) Ihat being said,therc can be little doubt that - like the vast majority of non-socialists - mostsocialists find both homosexual practices and homosexuals themselves mo-rally and physically repulsive, but in the shuggle for socialism anything goes.

Under a socialist government, hostility to homosexualify would almostcertainly become a criminal offence, as, under intense pressure and lobbyingfrom (mainly) socialists, hostility to enforced race-mixing is abeady a dc factocriminal offence.

SocialismAnd Quotas

The doctrine of oppression which socialists have foisted on society has beenextended from racial minorities to deviant minorities, specifrcally homosex-uals. The semantics of "oppressionn, which have been accepted almost uncriti-cally by academia, the media, politicians, and social policy makers, are bothdeceptive and duplicitous, as well as demonstrably false. Briefly, smialistsbelieve - or profess to believe - that certain desipated minorities: (27) blacks,(2E) homosexuals, (29) and others, are historically oppressed" discriminatedagainst and disadvantaged, and that because of this, positive discrirninaionnust be effected, backed up by tle full coercive power of the state, to ensureracial and other quotas in such areas as the professions, housing, various

20


frelds of employment, ad nauseum. As stated, the semantics are both deceptiveand wrong. Ib begin wit}, there is no such thing as positive discriminationbecause all discrimination is positive. (30)

Ihe doctrine of minority oppression also ignores such realities as differentracial and other social pattems in all fields of human activity. (31) If, say,Asians are under-rqtresented Q2) in certain professions it could be becausethey are over-represenfed in others. Ihe fact that they no\tr own half the snatlretail outlets in Britain might have something to do with the fact that there arcso few of them in the police force. An article published in the London EveningStandard of May 1E, 1981, quoted the managing director of the Spa supermar-ket chain, who predicted that more than half of Britain's independent grocerystores may be oumed by Asian shopkeepers in 5 years "because they grvecustomers what theywant". (33)

By the same token, heavyrveight boxing has been dominated almost totallyby (American) Negroes since the 1950s, while to date - 1996 - only one overseasplayer - the (white) Canadian CliffThorburn - has everwon the worldprofes-sional snooker sftnmpionship.Ihe ultimate lunacy of a quota system would beto have a democratically elected world heavpveight champion and a worldsnooker tifle awarded to players on the basis of race rather than merit

It is not clear if socialists would go that far, but the result of socialist policiesin the rcal world has been far more damaging to race relations, social policyand the economy than such amusing speculations. In the Unites States, thelargely socialist-communist-controlled.civil ights movement publicised itselfas 'a drive for economic advancement for the Negro but actually [revolved]about an attempt to invade the social privacy of whites." (34)

By setting racial and other quotas the government can compel businessmento employ less qualified persons solely on the basis of their race. It may evenforce employers to employ people who are manifestly unsuitable for the workperformed. An excellent if alarming example of this was the company in theUnited States which operated a policy of not employing fertile women in itsbattery making division. The reason for the operation of such a policy byJohnson Controls had notling whatsoever to do with keeping women in theirplace, rather it was a fetal protection policy which was necessary (in thegsmpany's opinion) because, in the light of scientilic evidence, the exposure oflead to women under such circumstances could lead to birth defects, or evenmiscarriages. This policywas ruled in breach of thePregnancy Discimination

2T


Act. Other comlmnies also operated fetal protection policies. Johnson Con'trols' policy was challenged on the grounds that it discrininates againstwomen - which it does and will do until such time as men too can becomepregnant. The American Civil Liberties Union, of all bodies, championed thispiece of nonsense, and eventually the case was argued all the way to theSupreme Courtwhere itwas held that companies have no right fo operate suchpolicies.

The end result of such a ban is that 'tompanies, in complying with a ban onfetal protection policies, will be opening themselves to potential tort liabilityin state courts for children prenatally exposed to dangerous chemicals andsuffering lifelong impaiments because of such exposure." (35)

Ihis is quite ctearly an abrogation of the rule of law, for common sense, ifnothing else, should dictate that nobody - not an individual nor a comlmny -

should be forced into a position where obeying one law: criminal' company orwhatever, should leave him, her or it open to prosecution under another.Ieaving this aside, it is obvious, is it nof that any socialist who uses suchspecious argunents in the cause of women's rights, doesn't really give a mon'key's about women, or about workers? As, of course, they don'L

More generally, when anti-discrimination legislation is applied in such anarbitrary manner, companies will be forced to employ rampant homosexualsor AIDS sulferers against their will. As a landlord, perhaps of a small dwellingyou could be compelled to let your premises to such people. Even to give themthe run of your orm home. (3O The latest piece of socialist-inspircd nonsenseis to lmss sweeping anti-discrimination legislation which will allegeilly benefrtthe disabled. The logical outcome of this piece of (undoubtedlywell-meaning)nonsense is that nigbt clubs win be compelled to employ a quota of disableddoormen!

AII this nonsense about quotas and the state regulation ofprivate businessadds to the costs ofproducing goods and services and therefore reduces thegoods and services available - the wealth of the community. while some legalrestrictions are always necessary (37) the extent ofsocialist central plenningis not only repressive offree enterprise but ofindividual Hberty; it is, in shorta forn ofpeople control.

22


SocialismAnd The "Peace" Movement

One field in ntich socialists and fellow travellers have long been active'though one ntich has faded into the backgrounil somewhat with the collapseof the Soviet Union, is that of unilateral nuclear disarmament, the so'calledpeace movement. TVhile the role of the former Soviet Union in promoting thisldeologr has, undoubterlly, been greatly exaggerated by right wing ideologuesand others, it remains a truism that the Soviets were nationalists at home and

communists abroarl Furthermore, the Soviets have neverbelievedin disarma'ment. Lenin believed that until socialism was established everyrvhere it was

false to advocate disarmament because nrevolutions could not be made by

unamed men'. (38) He wrote this in December 1916, but it remained a part of

soviet ideologr right up until the collapse.In otherwords, the propagation ofnuclear disamament by the Eastem Bloc served the express purpose of

undermining the West, and was not, and is not, based. on sincere ideologf or

deeply held political convictions.

23


Chapter Four: The Rule Of Law

SocialismAnd The Rule Of Law

One of the most absurd beliefs ever to be expounded by the socialists, orindeed by anyone, is that socialism will lead, somehow and inevitably, to theregeneration of man. When the workers' paradise linally arrives, there will beno need for policemen, prisons or any related institutions; not only willgovernmenf as far as it exists, be purely administrative, dealing with theofderly running of society, but nobody will break the law or even rnant to breakthe law.Ihis is not so much a political conceptas a religious one. (1) I*avingaside the inconvenient fact that there has never been the slightest eviilence thatanything like this will ever come about it is exhaordinarily naive, and isconparable to the pie-in-the-slry nonsense that most religions sell their adher-ents in retun lsr lgading vfutuous lives on Earth. (And paying their tithes).

Ihere is though a far more sinister side to socialism, and onerfrich alwayscomes beforc the promised Paradise on Earth. Ienin defined Marxism as nthe

doctrine ofclass warfare plus the dictatorship of the proletariat'. (2) And hedefined the dictatorship of the proletariat as "the rule - unrestricted by law' andbasedonforce -of theproletaiatoverthebourgeoisie, arule enioyingthe rympathyand support of the labouing and qloited masses." (3)

It is not easy to define precisely what is meant by the rule of laq but oneprcrequisite is that the law must be fairly abstract, that it must apply, orwouldappty, equatty, to everybody in the same circumstances. Ihere can be speciallaws goveming blind persons and women, for example, but these are notabrog"ations of the rule of law. (4) For example, in Britain' and in many othercountries, the law recognises that sometimes a woman who has recently givenbirthwill, because of a hormone inbalance or some such physiologicallybasedmental problem, harn or even kill her baby. Thus the law provides for theoffence of infanticide if it can be proved that this uras indeed the case. (5)

Children aad fseHs-minded persons may be subject to different laws, primar'

24


ily to protect them from exploitation, and so on. These are very properexceptions, as far as they can be called exceptions.

The chief safeguard for all of us is, in the words of F.A. Haye\ that "the rulesmust apply to those who lay them down and those who apply them - that is, tothe govemment as nrell as the governed - and that nobody has the power togrant exceptions.'(O

the socialist idea, tlat the government is unrestricted by law, means exactlythat, laws do not apply to the government, only to the regulation of the peopleunder the control of the communists/socialists. Itwas GeorgeVlrashingtonwhosaiil that government, like fire, is a dangerous ser:yant and a fearful master.(f Like all the Founding Fathers, Washington recognised that the lirst act ofgovernment must be to limit its own power; this is the purpose of a constitution,to limit the power of the govemment. A leading anli-Communist, Dr fhedSchnan, rccognises this also. Schwarz says of knin's dictum, that the gov-emment is unrestricted by law that " [t] his is a very sinister and serious featureof the Communist system...because the history of civilisation is the restmintof goverrrment by law. Govemment unrestrained by law is naked f5ranny." (8)

In Britain, in recent years we have been unfortunate enough to wihess an'mber of monshous injustices: the Birmingham Six, Guildford Four andsimilar caseso spring to mind. These cases and many others, have resulted inpeople challenging their convictions through the courts. kople who have beenurongly convicted, sentenced and sened time in prison can be arryardedmonetary compensation, although most people would turn doun any amountof money rather than spend the best years of their lives in prison. Sometimestoo the police overstep the mark, and again, there have been a number - a largenumber -of successfulactions againstthepoliceinrccentyears forfalsearrest,and other improprieties. Usually in such cases the police nght dl the way thensettle at the court door insisfing that they have arlmitteil no liability. Rarelyare olfending police ollicers even disciplineil in any meaningful sense of theword, nuch less subjected to criminal prosecution. (9)

In reality, even in a so-called democratic countrylike Britain, the police andotler authorities can often do more or less what they damn well like, and intle event of a complaint or investigation, the entire bureaucratic machinerycloses ranks in what many people often interyrret as a megalithic conspiracy.(10) [The cunent writer has personal erperience of tbis]. Police officers whoinvestigate other policp oflicers are the least respecteil by their colleagues.

25


ImFerfect as our system is, there are at least some checks and balances. Undercommunism/socialism, none of the even limited redresses the citizen has underour systen are possible. When you are arrested under socialism, the auth'orities can andwill do as they damn well please. Ihere is no suing the policefor urongful arrest, no suing the authorities for wrongful conviction. Indee4there is no wrongful arrcst, no wrongful convictionl once they have decided youare guilty, you are not only guilty but finished.

Britain does not have a written constitution, but in Britain and otlercountries, the govemment must obey the law, and can be challenged in thecourts if it doesn't. We will give here two historic examples of this, one ftomBritain, the other from the United States. First thougb,let us take a brief lookatMagna Carta.

The Rule Oflaw: From "Magna Carta"To SalmonP. Chase

TheMagna Carta (ieGreat Charter) was drafted at Runnymede and sipeilbyKi'g John on June L5rl2l5; it was an attempt by the barons to reshain thepon'erof thekingntoupuntil then could do prettymuch as heliked.Althoughit uas not the lirst such attempt, it has gone down in history as a landmarkAtre Magna Cartahail63 clauses; it was reissueil with alterations in tl16 anilAL| ; the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 is said to originate with clause 39. (L1) Forthe benelit of the total neophyte, awrit of.habeas corpus allorvs a man's lawyers,family or friends to challenge the lawfulness of his detention. It can be used,and often is used,when the police have arrrcsted somebodyfor a serious offence,usually murder or terrorism. People who are amested and detained in com-municado for several days have a strange propensity to make voluntaty confes'sions, which are then retracted in court.

In spite ofthe provisions ofhabeas cofpus, a person detained in policecustody has very litfle chance of being released until the police have had theirway with him. (12) Magistrates tend to rubber stamP such applicationsl thecumentmiterknorrs of no case inwhich awrit offtabeas corpus was successful

26


in freeing someone from police custody. That being said, ajudge can declarethe detention ofa prisoner in police custody or prison to be unlawful and canorder his rclease. Habeos corryS may also be used by someone detained undertheMentalHealthActrtowin his freedom. Under socialism, all this goes outofthewindow.

Ihe follorving snippets are of interest. Ab,e Magistrates' Court Act, 1952,requires that a person arrestedwithoutwarrant should be brought before amagistrate "'as soon as practicable' [and this] means, in the absence of anyspecial statutoryprovision, that he is 16 !s hsnght before a magistrates'courtwithin 48 hours of tle arrest..."

In a specimen period of three months, 212 persons (.43Vo) alrested by theMetropolitan Police, were detained for more than 72 hours before beingbrought before a magistrates' court" "Ihe percentage may be tiny, but we areconcerrred with people not percentages." (13) As stated, under socialism, allthis goes out of the window. Clearly, even under our (so-called) liberal systemof justice there are many abuses by the powers-that-be. A govetnment unre-strained by even these flimsy controls will soon become a naked $ranny.

Retuming to the Magna Carta prope4 three of the clauses read as follows:

38) 'No bailiff shall in future put anyone to trial upon his own bare word,without reliablewitnesses produced for this purpose,"

39) 'No free man shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised [dispossessed]or ouflawed or exiled or in any way victimised, neither will we attack him orsend anyone to attack him, except by the lanful judgment of his peers or by theIaw of the land."

40) "To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay right or justice.n

These are frne principles which the passage of time should not be allowed toerode. (14) Tlmes may change, technologr does, but Man's nature remains thesame, whatever the socialists would have us believe. Clause 40 is a vitattyimportant one; although a rich man can afford expensive lanyers (1O and theprivileges wealth brings, it is a point hardlyworth arguing that, in the criminalcourts at least the capitalist state has dispensed a far superior brand ofjusticeto the comnon man than Soviet Russia and Communist China. It is though

n


not only the individual citizen who may be taken to court under our bourgeoissystem ofjustice; the govemment can be taken to court if it breaks the law.

In April 1763, the MP andjournalist JohnWilkes (1725-97),the prime moverbehind a scunilous magazine called The North Biton, insulted the King'smother and accused the Monarch himself of lying. Although The North Bitonuas published anonSmously, the identity of the people behind it nas no greatsecret, and a general warrantwas drawn up to arrest "the authors, printers,and publishers of a seditious and treasonable paper entitled The North Biton,No. 45'. (1O The word "heasonable" u'as addeil to deny Wilkes the right topleadRarliamentaryprivitege.In three days 49 peoplewerearrested, includingmany totally innocent persons. (17) [It is worth mentioning here that accord-ing to a standard biography of Wilkes, there appears to have been a largeelement of role playing in this affair. Wlkes was sent to the Tower of London,in some style, (18) and although prior to his arrest he was running around likea blue-arsed fly, he never seems to have been in any danger of having his earsloppeil off, as diil William Prlmne. (19) Nevertheless, none of this shoulddistract the reader from the seriousness ofthe principle at issuel.

In the end" it n'as ruled not only that the general warrant was illegal, butthat a writ of habeas corpus had been infringed and Parliament violated. (20)Foltowing this, Wilkes won an action for trespass against the Under-Secretaryof State and f1,000 danages for carrying out the instructions of the generalwarranl (21)

A more prosaic example of the govemment being found in breach of the lawis the Second Greenbackcase of 1870 inwhich the American judge Salnon PChase ruled that greenbacks were unconstituti onal. Q2) As he had been in theIheasury at the time, and uras thereforc responsible for the 1862 Legal TbnderAct, he convicted himselfl (23)

Ihere have been othe6 contemporary, instances of the government beingprosecuted successfully because of the separation of the Executive am ofgovemment from the Legislative and the Judiciary. Again, this is by no meansper{ect, and judges are all the time subjected to polifical and other pressures.But under socialism the Executive is also both the Legislative and the Judi-ciary. Q4) This principle is what socialists refer to as Denocratic Centralisn.A betier phrase is naked granny. Later, Ilitler copied this structure in NaziGermany with the kadership Principle.

28


Chapter Fivs Religion, Arts And Media

Socialism And Religious Freedom

It is well lmorm tlat Karl Mam refened to religion as the opiate of the people.(1) Foltowing their antinomian dictum that anything that forwards the classstruggle is goodandanythingthat hinders itis evil, theatheistic socialists haveat times supported religious freedom in exactly the same uay these greatintemationalists have supported nationalist movements and movements ofso<alled national liberation, particularly in the so-called Third World" thebackrnarilness of which is aluays blamed on Imperialism nhich is somehowsaid to have drained the wealth out of these countries. (2)

Once the dictatorship of the proletariat has been established' religiousfreedom like all other freedoms are abolished. Like their crusades againstracismrsacism, andeveryotherlin, the socialists'support ofreligious fieedomis simply a means to an end.

Creativity: The Arts And The MediaUnder Socialism

We have already covercd this ground to some extent but I will eTand on ithere. As a uriter who has been hacking away for years and getting preciselynonhere I often find it very frustratingwhen I see r+riters with far less talentthan myself getting into print regularly, selling millions, and making a greatdeal of money. I am particularly annoyed when the only talent some of tleseuriters possess is an ability to lie convincingly. (3) Socialists themselves oftenpoint to the tabloiil pness as evidence of the degeneracy of capitalism: lies,nonsense, salacious gossip, poorly wriffen, trivia blown up into front page

29


news, and so on. For once they are not wrong. Who couldn't find, research andurite better stories in a mor.e professional manner?

At the time of rvriti.g - Summer 1995 (4) - two female authors of doubtfrtltiterary talents - Martina Navratilova and Naoni Campbell - are riding highwith gbost'written novels. Ihere can be no doubt whatsoever that whatever themerits of their respective books, both these ladies have got into print solely onaccount of being who they are. (5) Navratilova is of course the grrcatest tennisplayer of all time, while Campbell is a leading fashion model, perhaps rlzeleading black fashion model in the world. (6) An unsuccessful hack might lookwith envious eyes on Navratilova and Campbell, ask himself (or herselD whytten rather than me? and reply because capitalism sucks. As indeed it does.(7) But at least under capitalism it is possible for a woman to becomefabulously wealthy and a published novelist by ptaying tennis in Martina'scase, (8) or simply by looking good in Canpbell's. (9)

Publishing isn't quite a closed shop, but rn'riting books has been more or lessseem up by journatists, academics and a few others. It goes without saying thatnot all of these authors have much merit, or indeed any at all. (10)

Artgular conespondent of mine - and fellowlibertarian - Sean Gabb' editorof Free Life - is in much the same position as me and countless others. He isnot only at least as good a writer as myself but is an extremely erudite qualifietllanyer and historian. Awhile ago a mutual friend commenting on his work saiilthat he was forrver writing excellent articles and sending them offto magazinessuch as t}re Spectatorrand never, or hardly ever, getting anything in prinL SeanGabb anil I are farfrom alone, indeed" the number of talentedwriters who havenever, andwill never, getanyrvhere, is dwarfed bythe n 'mber of firstrate actorsand other per{onners' composers, (1L) talented fine artists, and so on.

All the above people have the dubious pleasure every day of their lives, ofseeing far less talented people than themselves reaping rich renrards under thecapitatist system. At times they see people who are liffle better than imbecileshaving fame and fortune thrust upon them while somewhere out there isanother Beethoven, another Shakespeare, another Rembrandt, the worldwillnever eyen hear of, much less appreciate. There are people who have rrittennovel after novel who have never even had so much as the offer of a publishingcontrac! much less got into print. Any one of these unpublished authors couldbe another Charles Dickens.

30


It is not simply the unpublished author who has a hard time of it undercapitalism; let us look briefly at capitalism's staunchest defender, Ayn Rand.Rand was bom Alice Rosenba'mr and had the doubtful pleasure of growingup in Russia at the time of the 1917 Revolution; her familywere middle classand would certainly have been marked down for liquidation had she notescaped to tle West. Rand made her way to Hollywood where she had somegood luck, finding work as a screen nriter. By the early thirties she nas anestablished name; unfortunately, her anti-communism didn't go donm at allwell in certain circles, intellectuals in particular had a strong aversion to iL(n)

Her novel We, The Livingwas completed at the end of 1933; (13) her agentsubmitted the book to publishers, (at least she had an agent, most prospectivenovelists never have the good fortune to be taken on by one). Rand lost countof the rejections; (14) a number of publishing houses had not troubled todisguise tle fact that the cause of their rejection was not Iiterary but political:they saw no possibility of making a profrt on a book that denounced SovietRussia! (15) The bookwas finallypublished in 1936.

Another of her books, The Fountainhead, which went on to become abestseller and was made into a film, had twelve rejections prior to publication;it was said to have had 'ho conmercial possibilities". (16) Yet another Randworlq her 1939 play Think Twice, was never performed and was publishedposthumously. lhis was not the only of her works to be so published, andindeed, nany other authors (including Karl Marx!) have obtained recognitiononly after their deaths. (17)

Many people in Rand's position have an axe to grind with the capitalistsystem, or if - like Rand - they don't, then it is as good as certain tlat at timesthey feel they have, or that they have received a raw deal. For capitalism doesoften reward mediocritywhile tuming a blind eye and a deaf ear to talent, oreven genius. (18) Libertarians are often said to be in love with capitalism, butthe truth is that all Libertarians recognise the shortcomings of the cument(so-called) capitalist system, (19) and nobody realises more than Sean Gabbthat a uriter of his proiligious talents would not simply remain largely unreadunder socialism but would not even be pernitted to write.

Ihe same goes for all artists: poets, rock musicians, fine artists; undersocialism these people ane among the first to be persecuted, (20) for after it

31


assumes power, the last thing the dictatorship of the proletariatwants is people

who rock the boat, radicals, critics of the new order-..Actually, the situation for artists and others is nowhere near as bad as it

used to be, due primarily to new technologr. }Tith the advent of the homecomputer, desktop publishing affordable, quality photocopying and paperprinting plates, (21) it is now not too diflicult for any aspiring author to getinto print. The cassette tape and tle video tape are also extremely affordable.(n, AJone time, the capital investment required to publish a book or to pressa record uas beyond most people's means. Now, anyone with enough commit-ment can overcome these prohibitive hurdles. Ihe main problems noril forauthols and artists are publicity and distribution. (23) Rest assurcd that,however insurmountable the problems of generating publicityanil distributingonets workmay appear to be under capitalism, under socialism theywould beacademic, because no one who did not receive explicit state approval would bepermitted to Publish or Perform.

\{e must now nove on, but we shall take another ' and quite terrifying ' lookat the media under socialism after reviewing the prelude and aftermath of theBolshevik Revolution.

32


Chapter Six Academia, Education,HealthAnd Medicine

Academic Freedom Under Socialism

Ihere are few areas of human activity where freedom of inquiry is moreinportant than academia; this applies to the social sciences as much as to thehard sciences. Without freedom of inquiry progress is impossible in any field.Harilly a day passes when some academic or other doesn't voice a supposedlycontroversial opinion in the popular prress or other mainstream media. Justbecause an opinion, idea, theory or whatever is controversial, doesn't meanthat it has any merit at all. There is still a Flat Earth Society in existence tothis day; the idea that the Earth is flat is quaint if nothing else, but of course,it has no merit at all. In Galileo's ilay though the idea that the Earth wasspherical was extremely controversial, and ifyou had voiced such ideas incertain circles, 1;ks Qalilse himself you would have found yourself in deepwaten Or even on a bonfrre!

In spite of their commifinent to the scientific method, and their (supposed)willingness to tlrow out any hlpothesis, theory or law that is patenflyurong,scientists are tardigrade beasts. Virtually every new idea in science has beenridiculed and scorned by scientists before it has been accepted as the newwisdom. Itwas thegreat German physicist Max Planckwho said that "Ihe newscientifrc truth does not triumph byconvincing its opponents andmakingthemsee the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a newgeneration grows up that is familiarwitl it " (1)

Long after scientists have accepted the value of a new hgrothesis or theoryor have ftamed a new law, the general public and the media continue to givespurious credence to proven nonsense. (2) The best ercamples of this arc thecontroversies surrounding astrolory, the Loch Ness Monster, flying saucers,spirit medinmship, psychic nspoon-bending", and other such nonsense. (3)Anyone who has studied the scientific literature of these subjects will realisethat such controversies exist only in the media.

a aJ J


Astrologers call their art a sciencel Manists call their philosophy a science.(4) One would e:ryect therefore that the science of Mamism-Leninism wouldwelcome free inquiry. The reality is that Manists and their fellow travellershave been in the forefront of all opposition to free inquiry in frelds whichconflict with their dogma; they were politically conect long before that termwas invented.

Ihe most obvious example of the socialist suppression of free inquiry anilfree debate is in the so<alled inheritance/environment controversy, with par-ticular regard to the difference between intelligence quotients between differentraces. Nay, they go even further than this, they claim that race has no meaninginthe biological sense; theyactually denytheevidence of tleir senses andwouldhave us do likewise. (5) Thus, when decent and rcspectable scientists such asArthur Jensen and Hans Eysenck have stated their views on nace and intel-ligence, they have been subjected to threats, intimidation and ouhight violence,as well as a racial inquisition by egalitarian acadenics. (QEysenck has statedthat, like the controversy over the paranornal, the controversy oyer race andintelligence exists only in the media. (7) He might have addeil that thiscontroversy has been manufactured by leftist pressune' polemicising and inti-midation, (8) principalty by smearing aII hereditarians as practitioners ofscientificracismror even Nazi race science.

Ihe obvious inequality of man - and the biological inequivalence of men andwomen - is an insumountable stumbling blockto the advent of theirwo*en'paradiserand must be stamped on at every opportunity. (9)

Serious as is the war on race science by socialists, commu ists and theirfellow havellers, the suppression of academic freedom in another freld set theentire Soviet Bloc back a generation; I am refeming here to Lysenkoism.IheSoviet "scientistn lbofim Denisovich Lysenko (189E-197O rose to prominencewith vemalization, the practice of soaking aad shilling winter wheat so that itwouldgive greateryields than springwheat. Thiswasn'this discoveryalthoughhe palmed it off as such. (10) Lysenko was a Lamarckisf a follower ofJean-Baptiste Lamarck (1J4/,-1829). Lamarck believed in the inheritance ofacquired characteristics, which was by no means an absurd belief in his day,at least ituas no more absurd than the thenwidelyhetdbelief, firstpostulatedin the Seventeenth Century, that theworld began in 4004BC. (11) Be that as itmay, Lamarckism was discredited everlnn&ere by the 1930s. Except in Soviet

34


Russia. LamarcKs onlylasting contribution ofvalue to historyappears to havebeen his invention of the word biologr. (12)

Lysenko's particular brand of Lanarckism endeared him to the Sovietbureaucracy, and he became"dictator of Communistic biolory" during Stalin'sr€gime; as a resulf education and research in standard genetics were virtuallyouflawed. (13) As well as promising increased grain yields Lysenko claimedthat wheat plants raised in the appropriate environment produce seeds of rye,which is equivalent to saying that dogs living in thewild give birth to foxes. (14)

Ihe rest is a matter of historical record; as stated, Lysenko set Soviet biologrback a generation. Under a world socialist government there would no aca-demic freedom at all. Indeedo aside fron Lysenkoism and race issues, we in theWest have already had a big dose of politically correct socialist science in theAIDS scam. The best evidence ind.icates that the root cause of AIDS is homo-sexual-related titth; in thewords of the Chief Rabbi, Sir Immanuel Jakobowits'AIDS is "the inevitable price for moral negligence or turpitude'. (15) However,socialist queers andtheir friends in the mainstream socialist andcommunistmovements have succeeded in spreading the lie that we are all equally at riskfrom AIDS. Ironically, these normally so temibly "anti-racistn friends of theoppressed haven't shrunk from practising their orrn form of racismby accusingAfricans of being primarily responsible for the spread of this modem dayplague.

In October 1986, the homosexual socialist activist Peter Ibtchell wrote inthe Ieft wing jounal7 Daysz'Contrary to the mytholory that Aids is a gayplague, the overrvhelming majority of people with Aids are heterosexual,including as many women as nen...Most of these Aids cases are in cenhalAfrica...In Aftica it is estimated.thatf%o of the total population is nowinfectedbut in some counhies it is much higher -25Vo of the Malawi population' 237oof the Uganilan population..." (16)

Ihis is not an isolated example of the organised homosexual movementtsscapegoating others for their folly, filth and sin. It is more than likely that anyfuture socialist government would, under pressure from its powerftrl homo'sexual wing and its sympathisers, (17) ban outright any research in any freldwhatsoever which led, or was likely to lead to, politically incorrect conclusionsabout their lifestyles, or indeed to any detrimental interlretation of socialistpropaganda. Ofcourse, such academic censorship has nothing whatsoever to

35


do with science, and will, if unchecked, lead us into another Dark Ages asLysenkoism did to the Soviet Union, only a hundred times worse.

Freedom Of Education Under Socialism

It follows from the above discussion of the suppression of academic freedomunder socialism that whatever freedom of education exists under the socialistgovennment of the future will be minimal, so we needn't dwell on this. Sufficeit to say that all private schooling will be outlawed, all religious education willalso be outlawed, (I-8) and anything that does not conform to the prevailingdogma will be ruthlessly suppressed. This could - and very likely would - mean,that your children would be indoctrinated with such niceties as "gay lessons",and indeed this has already happened under the guise of promottng eEtalopportunities and combating the mythical disease of homophobra. (19) Muchother socialist-indoctrination disguised as education would follow.

An inportant point which must not be overlooked here is that, just associalists advocate religious freedom as a short term, tactical manoeuvrie, sodo fhey advocate - or appear to advocate - freedom ofchoice for parents toeducate their children. Many inner city areas of Britain now have large Moslempopulations, and socialists attempt to win them over by claiming to combatracism, promises of more government funding for education, and the like. Itgoes without saying ttrat under the socialist government of the future, thechildren of Moslems will also be indoctrinated with "gay lessons" and all theother paraphemalia of socialist indoctrination, and, in the first instance,funding for Moslem schools, and later the schools themselves, will be phasedout.

36


Ilealth And Medicine Under Socialism

the National Health Service was introduced in Britain in 194E and has muchto be proud of. We in Britain have often heard. horror stories about theconsequences of falling ill or suffering serious injury in tle United Statesnwhich does not have alree healtb. service. Whenever you go abroad on holidayor on business, it is a priority that you arrange proper med.ical insurance.Private medicine has been criticised for being mercenarl; other complaintsoften heard are that the current two tier system encourages moonligbting byconsultants, poaching of the best stafffrom the NHS by private health oper'ators, and so on.Ihese are serious criticisms, anditwouldbeurongto affemptto make light of them. Again though, the s ocialist solution is seen as taking thewhole system under state control, and again, this is no solution at all.

One of the arguments used frequently to denigrate private medicine is theclaim that the rich are able to buy themselves a better quality of healthcarethan ordinaryworking people, and to some extent to jump the queue.Ihis istrue, but the queuewill not disappear under socialism, the factors of produc-tion are always limited. (20) All the evidence indicates that under socialism thehospital queue grows even longer than under a health care systen whichcontains an element of laissezfaire.

In 1993, a young girl named Laura Davies underwent specialist treahentin the United States at enormous expense. The King of Saudi Arabia alonetlonateil f,150,000 to an appeal fund.In June 1'992' the four year oldunderrventa 16 hour liver and bowel transplant operation. L,ater she underrvent furthermassive surgery but, sadly, died in November 1993. It doesn't take much of animagination to see the sort of arguments that socialists can enploy here.However, the fact that the King of Saudi Arabia - one man - put his hanil in hisorm pocket and coughed up the sum of$150'000 does tend to refute the c}aimthat the mega-rie.h arc all worthless parasites. Under socialism there wouldhave been no such angel of nercy, and Laura's treatment would still have hadto be paid for.Who would have pid for it? And bywhat criteriawould she havebeen treated?

It is possible, even likely, that a four year old girl would have be trtated everybit as erpediently under socialism, but what about someone who was not so


attractive? This brings us to another, and quite sinister, aspect ofsocialisedmedicine, its use as a fotm of people control, in particular, to persuade peopleagainst theirwills to conform to certain lifestyles.

On August 13,1993, a 47 year old lifelong smoker named Harry Elphiclqdied rvhile awaiting a heart bypass operation. His death caused a wave ofcontroversyin the print and telecommunications media, and in nedical circles,because he hail been refused treatment on account of his habit. Mr Elphickhad a history ofcoronary heart disease and suffered from angina. He neededa heart blpass operation but was told by the consultant at WythenshaweHospital, Manchester, that he wouldn't be considered for one until he stoppedsnoking. He stopped, but not in time. He was buried the day he rras due to beadmitted for tests, having gone sixweeks without smoking a cigarette.

Ihe case of Harry Elphick was by no means an isolated one. At the time alot of blather appeared in the media about doctors having to make rationaldecisions about the management of linite resources, as they do, and as we havealready stressed, but there can be no doubt that the refusal to operate on HarryElphick had as much to do with social policy as with medical judgrnent.

Between 1920and 1933 theUnited States wentthrough the era of Prohibitionduring which it uas iltegal to manufacture or sell any drink with morc than57o alcohol content on pain of a $1,000 frne or 6 months in gaol. (21) Prohibi-tion was considered a great social disaster and was eventually abandoned.Many other practices have been prohibited under regimes socialist and non'socialist, including of course the prohibition of hard drugs, u&ich is stillwithus,andnotleasttheprohibition of certain religions andpolitical philosophies.

The total monopoly of health services by the state offers a more effectiveform of Sranny than almost any other. Any practice - whether related to healthor not - could be outlawed on pain of the removal of the right to medicaltreahent If this sounds too bizar're and too outrageous to consider, the readershould think again. A govemment that has a total legal monopoly can doexactly as it likes, and that includes in the fields ofhealth and general welfare.

38


Chapter Seven: A CloserlookAtTodavts Socialists

PayingTheirDues

The lhotskyite Socialist Workers Party publishes a weekly nerrspapen Thereare many otler well-establisheil socialist publications, T\e Moming Star ispublished daily. By contrast, the declared arch-enemies of socialism, theso-called fascists publish monthly journals and broadsheets. Although in theUnited States, the far right is generally far better funded' there can be littledoubt that for all its professed share-the-wealth dogma, the far left in Britainis extremely wealthy. This wealth comes not only from its patrons, from thecapitalist foundations and trusts it professes to despise' from Ieftwing coun'cils, (1) and from its business fronts, (2) but from ordinary rank and lilemembers.

In the Spring of 1995, a small right wing journal published a contributionschedule (Regishation form) for the SocialistWorkers Partywhich shows howmuch members are expected to pay each month. For a single person thesubscription ranges from unemployed at S4 per month to f5 for students tof24 for someone earning $500 per month to a staggering Sa00 a month forsomeone eaming 92,000 a naonth. (3) This is a political party that doesn'tcontest elections and which is forever denouncing the rich as parasites. AI'thougb one can only admire the dedication (or gullibitif) of the SWP's grassroots membership, no organisation which demands 20Vo of its members' netearnings has the right to denounce the rich or anyone else as parasitic. Underan SWP-style socialist govemment everybody would be expected to pay evenheavier dues, not to t,he party, but to the state. Remember, under capitalisn'man works for profit; under socialism, he works for the cornrnon goodrieforthe state.

39


A Closer Look At Today's Socialists: TheSWPandtheCPGB

Ihe time has come norv to take a closer look at the rhetoric of contempomrysocialists. We shall do this by examining a short book by leading SocialistWorker and.jounalist Paul Foot and a pamphlet by the Socialist Party of GreatBritain.

The SocialistWorlsers Party is without doubt the leading thotskyite organi-sation in Britain.In July 1990' it publishetl THE CASE FOR SOCIALISM:WIAT I:HE S OCULIST WORKERS PARTY STANDS FOR' which uas urit-tcn by-Paul-Eootr one ofjlsmore high profiIe members.

Apparently what the SIYP stanils for is nreal socialisd. The (former) SovietBloc and everybody else who professed to practise socialism werre reallycapitalists rvho were simply pretending. This is not simply dead urong but atotal andwilful distortion of the true nature of Malxism-Leninism. Ihe usualSWP traddle - as you'll realise if youte ever arguedwith one of its members'is that the former Soviet Union practised, not socialism' but State Capitalism.Ihe Revolution rftrs both glorious and successful, but nas usurped by Stalin.Ihe huth is that it nras the great Lenin himself who introduced State Capital'ism. According to Marxist-Ieninist theory Imperialism is the highest stage ofcapitalism, (4) capitalism itself being the highest stage of human developmentto dztn, and one which will be succeeded - inevitably ' by socialism. Accordingto Lenin, State Capitalism was introduced as a transitional stage' (O in reatifhe introduced it because it soon became obvious that total socialism (ieabsolute collectivisn) doesn't work (Q Just how ludicrous is socialism inpractice can be seen from the chaos that resulted from the short lived rEgimeof B6la Kun in Hungary.

40


B6laKun - Flom Fanaticism To Farce

Like knin, Ktrn uas a law graduate. He was also a great admirer of leninand as soon as he took power in Hungary in 1919 he set about putting the fullCommunist programme into practice. Although he set up one of the firstcommunist dictatorships, Kun's name is rarely heard in even communistcircles today. Anyone who reads his entry in the Encyclopaedia Britannicawcllsoon realise why. (7)

Kun planned to convert the peasants to communism by force; seldom doforced conversions to any philosophy have favourable consequences, none lessso than f6 sg6pnni sm. Britannica tells us "Kunts programme lvas to tarm atonce, and forcibly hansfer every industry and all landed property withoutconservation into the hands of the proletariat ' At lirst he collaborated withthe Social democrats, but soon shouldered them aside, nationalizeil all banks,all concems with over 20 employees, all landed property over 1p00 ac., everybuilding other than worlmen,s dwellings. All jewellery all private property

above the minimum (e€., two suits,4 shirtsr 2 pairs of boots and 4 socks) u'as

seized; ser:vants abolished, bathrooms made public on Saturday nights;priests,with the insane, criminals and shopkeepers employingpaidassistantswere declared incapable of the active or passive suffrage.n

The currentwriter has no infornation on the state of Hungarian bathroomsin 1919, but obviously tleywere far fewer and farther between than they arenouadays. Can you inagine, dear reader, the sort of lunacy compelling people

to open up fheir bathrooms to the great unwashed would lead to, even in thisilay anfl age? Kun inhoduced a nerv curTency; like all communists he didn'trealise that money has no intrinsic value, and as soon as people stop believingin it, it isn't worth the paper itts printed on. The new cruTencywas boycottedand 'the urban population starved, while prices soared." (8) Krn was in power

for less than five months before the peasants hail had enough; he was throuminto a lunatic asylum - the best plass fff him 'but escaped to Austria.

41


A Closer LookAt Today's Socialists:The SWP - continued

Returning to Foot, wilh de rigueur socialist disrespect for truth, the aufhorwhiteuashes Soviet Russia and blames its subsequent plunge into tganny onStalin. On pages 14-5 he gives the impression that Karl Marxwas sone kindof 'anti-racist". The reality is that Marx was both a vicious anti'black bigot anda gutter anti-Semite, the latter notwithstanding his own Jewish origins.

The American Jewish author Nathaniel Weyl has uritten that "...the beliefthat some races ane innately more able, nore vigorous, and morc intelligentthan others...uas the consensus opinion of educated men in Marx's tine. Itwas a view held by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, andother American statesmen. Philosophers like Daviil Hume and Montesquieuconcurred in it.' (9)

This is indeed true, and although the racism of Thomas Jefferson andAbraham Lincoln (the Great Emancipator) have likewise been written out ofthe history books, it is common knowledge in certain circles that they wereanything but egalitarians. (10) However, the racism of Karl Marx and hismentor Engels went far beyond a belief that blacks, and others, were geneticallyinferior. According to Weyl "Strangely enough, the so'called secltt conversa'tions of Adolf Hitlerare less suffusedwith hatred and destruction than Marx'scontributions to the Marx-Engels correspondence." (11) Yet in spite of this'"Publicly and for political reasons, both Marx and Engels posed as friends ofthe Negro. In private, theywere antiblack racists of the most odious sort." (12)

Atthougb they may not be infused with eitler an intense hatreil of the Negroor an overtly patronising attitude, there is little reason to believe that today'sleading (white) socialists are any less cynical about non-whites than they areabout the workers they profess loud and long to support. Certainly theyrutllessly exploit both in the furtherance of their ideologr of anti'capitalisthatred. (13)

Returning to Foot's book, the reader is toltl that "Man argueil that allhuman historywas dominated by a tussle for the wealth between classes, oneof which took the wealth, and used it to exploit tle others'" (14) We have already

42


disposed of this nonsense; Marri and Foot and his ilk would have us believethat the likes of capitalists such as BilI Gates and Riclard Branson, andcorporations like Marla & Spencer are simply expropriators of wealth ratherthan creators of it. While it is probably a little unfair to take Marx to task forpromulgating this view, Foot, who lives more than a centurXr later' has noexcuses. Furthermore, he bas seen the evil effects of the philosophyMan didso much to crrcate, so if Marx can be dismissed as a well-meaning crackpot'Foot can only be denounced as a mischief'maker.

Foot tells us that workers have to seize the wealth of their so'called exploi-ters: (15) Exploiters nto amassed their power and wealth by robbing workerswere not sentimental or namby-pamby about iL They would hold on to theirwealth and power, if they had to, by force. They would neYer sturender thatpower and wealth, however intellectually or morally unjustifiable it was.' (16)

One can argue of course that men should not have polYer over other men, andthat the power of the state shouldbe dispersed. Foot and companydo notwantto disperse or deshoy such power though, rather theywant to bring it all undertheir control. His claim or inference that people should surender their wealthbecause it is immoral for them to be wealthy is totally fallacious.

l{e have refuted this fallacy already (that of the redistribution of wealth)'along with that of tle class shuggle, but we reiterate, if it were left to the likesof Foot to decide how muei personal wealth we should be pemitted toaccumulate, and if we were left to obey the likes of Foot (and his idol lhotsky)in order to eat, we woulil all be in serious trouble.

Foot continues: The new millionaires who emerged in the 1980sr almost toa man, are people without any noticeable skill, intellect or ability. They areexpert only at playng the stock market or sacking workers - the two activitiesmost likely to make a f35t millien.' (17) While there is, unfortunately, morethan a grain of truth in this claim, it is not the remorseless quest for profitthat makes workers redundant but nerv technologr. However, until such timeas the capitalist system can be reformed, (L8) we will all of us have to live withits evil

"oosequ"oces. That being said" capitalists who do not invest their

capital soon become ex-capitalists' so rnoney saved by sacking one set ofworkers will usually be rcinvested elsewher.e.

Foot is on even weaker grounds when he claims that the rich are rich becausethey have robbed other people's labour. (19) Again' while there are suchcreatures as the idle rich, the likes of Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Anita

43


Roddick and so on are people who have built vast business empires, andalthough they enjoy a standard of living and lifestyles that most people wouldenry, they haven't got where they are today by lying on their backs. (20)

A much more serious grievance, and one Foot doesn't raise, is that of thegrotesquely inflated salaries paid to certain chairmen of formerly nationalisedindustries. Recently, even certain Conservatives have commented. unfavour-ably on this sort ofthing, and there have been calls for legislation to cap toppeoplets salaries. One chief executive who came under fire was Cedric Broum,the Chairman of British Gas. In June 1995 the Times reported that whileBritish Gas had axed orwas about to axe 25,000 workers due to nRestructur-

ingi (21) Mr Broum had been awarded a 75Vo pay nse which took his salary toa cool S475,000.

Small shareholders didn't like this much, and over 4,500 of them attendedthe company's AGM where many of them voiced angry opinions, (one fellorveven took along a pig named Cedric!). The small shareholders voted over-whelmingly against the reappointment of 4 directors including Broum, but thebig institutions (which hold, 97 Vo of the votes) had other idea s. QZ)

Cedric Bronm uas not the only chairman of the fomer nationalised indus-tries found to be eaming a mighty salary The Chairman of Eastern Electricwas on 9242r(X)0 a year and the Chairman of NorthWestWaternnas on S338'0fi).Opposition leader Tiony Blair called for the govemment appointed-regulatorsto stop nthese excesses'. (23) Although even Conservative politicians realisedthat this sort of indulgence represented the unacceptable face of capitalism,the govemnent rejected legislation. Wider share ornmership and such grassroots protests as that elfected by the angry British Gas shareholders are to beencouraged, and are, in the long run, likely to have a positive effecl But evenif they don'trmost peoplewould prefera pignamed Cedric to a latterdaySovietbear.

Retuming to Foo! on page 57 he carps that'If the people of Zanbia paideverythingthey produced to the bankers and investment companies who haveIoaned their country money, itwould still take them three full years to pay offthe interest charges." Like all socialists, Foot is wilfully blinit to tle creationand control of money. He doesn't even think to ask where money comes from,because he doesn't care, and like all socialists he is concetned with enslavingthe people rather thanwith liberating them.

44


on page 60 he endorses higher taxesl we have already seen what such higher

taxes lead to. On page 61 he states batdly that "Most rich people' however, are

rich through no ability of their otYn." Ihis is obviously somethingthe Odord'

educated Foot knows a lot about. Exactly how much of his standing as a long

time tabloid journalist is due to ability, and how much to his having been bom

with a silver spoon in his mouth?page 69: "Socialism means that tle means of production are onmed and

controtled by society so thatwhat is produced can be shared out according to

people's needs. socialism is founded on the idea of equality,which means that

iloJt peopte wilt get the same." On page 70, he sounds as though he really

believes that a brain surgeon and a refuse collector will work for the same

money. Lcaving that aside,let us return to the second part of that firsJsentence:'khat is producetl can be shared out according to people's needs." lVIy needs

are a new 486 computer with a gigabyte hard dis\ a chaulfeur driven limousine

and a villa in the South of Flance. That's only my needs, wait until we get onto

my desires.Doubtless you, dear reader, have sinilarly modest needs and desires. If you

haven'! the next man certainly has. The very fact that there are such things as

thefts, robberies, burglaries, frauds - simple, complex, great and small 'is

surely proof enough that people's perceptions of their needs and desires often

exceedtheirmeans. Somehow,under socialism, all this is goingto be done arYay

with. The worker will produce, and, if his neighboar needs more than he

produces, he will share it with him. There will be no poverty because if you are

i*g"y, your neighbour will feed you. And there will be no destitute people

either, because Paul Foot, like B6la Kun, will order you to open up your

bathroom to the local dossers on saturday night, and maybe put them up on

your sofa as well. oh boy! The most frightening thing is that these bozos

ac'tuallybelieve this cloud cuckooland stuff.Thais not all though, don't forget that according to Comrade Foot, nSocial'

ism is founded on the idea of equality, which msans that most people will get

the same." At the time of writing, judges are paid salaries of nearly seventy

thousand pounds a year. (24) The far left are forever carping on about the

supposeilly exorbitant salaries of judges, MPs and the like. But there is a

metnod in this apparent madness. Members of Parliament were initially

unpaid. Even today, most magistrates are unpaid, which in effect means that

thei.e arrc very few working class magistrates. (25) Paylng such people, and

45


paying them well, actually widens the franchise, particnlarly to people fromworking class backgrounds. Ihe reason judges are (apparently) so highly paiilmight also have something to do with making bribes less attractive. (26) Undersocialism thougb, there will be no need to worry about that. Not onlywill noone be rich enough to ofrer judges bribes, but judges wiII be academic anryay.If they exist at all, their function will be simply to rubber stamp Executivepolicy. Including in criminal frials. Q7)

Page 70: The socialist argument is that people are far morr likely to do whatthey uant to do, and what they are best able to do, if the reward for everythingis roughly the same...o

Ihe onlythingunongwithFoot's logic is everything.While it is certainlytruetlat manywealthypeople, people of independent means, retired pebple, etc, doworkatwhat they choose, including voluntarywor\ tlere is a vast gulf betweenthe voluntary worker and active pensioner, and a world in n&ich everybodydoes what they want and what they are best at. (28) According to Foot, a doctorwho has to train for seven years will receive the same remuneration as a carpark attendant A senior factory manager with thirty years enperience and agreat deal of responsibilitywill receive the same remuneration as the man whomops the floor. And of cource, they will all be blissfully happy with tlis stateof alfairs. We have though, omitted a minor - or perhaps not so minor -qualification. What Foot actually says is that"most people will get the same.n@mphasis added). It doesn't take too much imagination to rcalise that Footand his chums in the SWP - who will be telling everybody else what to do - arenotmostpeople. (29)

On page 71, f,'oot refers to public ownership of the means of production andstat€s or implies that tlis will not include cons'mer goods. Bear in mindthough dear reader, that it is not nerely the ghosts of Ienin and thotslry thatwill haunt this nightmane world, but the ghost of B6la Kun. Will your batlroom,your motor car (if the state gives you a permit for one), or even your bed" becounted as consumer or as capital goods?

Still on page 7lz "...the whole point of tle public ownership of the means ofproduction is that more is produced and shared out, not less."

The proof of that pudding is the collapse of Communism. Professor Quigleyrelates that after the Second World War, Russian soldiers were amazed that"erploited" Geman workers onmedwristwatches; their standard of livinguasthat mucl higher. (30) Such startling revelations are not difficult to find. The

46


gulf between the United States and the Soviet Union was even greater' (see pages7).

On page 73, Foot tells us tlat socialism will be controlled from beloq"democratically", of course. This is what the planned economy is all aboul Foothimself will playno part in controllingtbiswo*ers'paradisel indeed, conside-ring his bourgeois origins, he'd be most fortunate to escape being shot as aclass enemy.

ANobleException

Atthough PauI Foot is living in cloud cuckooland, the de rigueur claims ofsocialists that the profit motive can be done awaywith is not a total nonsense,but this requirts a re+valuation of the meaning of the word profit. Ihe mostobvious examples are the fields of creativiff (eg the arts, including literatureand music) anil the voluntary sector. Many are the poets who have never gotinto print; thecumentwriter has correspondedwith two novelists, one ofwhomhad at the time - several years ago - written five novels without having onepublished. At one time I lnew personally an extremely talented composer andperfonner - primarily a classical guitarist - who had composed, according tohis own reckoning, two thousand or more pieces of music; he has hadverylittlepublished. Ihe world is full of such people, doubtless you, dear rrcader:, knowof some such person, or several of them. You may even be one!

Similarly, there are many millions of people throughout the world whosevoluntarywork earns them no frnancial reward, sometimes leaves them out ofpocket, despised by certain sections ofthe public, or even endangers their lives.(31) However, whatever drives such people - creativity, a sense of duty' orperhaps even some base motive - it is a total fantasy eYen to suggest that tleworld can be run along such lines. There is a vast chasm between writing anovel, performing a song, or manning a lifeboat on an ad hoc basis, andsweeping the streets Iive days a week for thirty years. Or training for severalyearr as a doctor or an architect and then working at somebody else's whimfor as long as that person pleases, whether or not that person is Leon llotslcy'Paul Foot, or some other collectivist.

47


As a confirmed Social Crediter, the current writer recognises that thepurpose ofthe financial system should be to tlistribute the goods and servicesthe community can produce rather than to act as a de facto system of punish'ment and rermrd, but again, there is a vast chasm between a sound linancialsystem - one which delivers 1[s pnximgm goods and services with the mini-mum effort - and onewhich condemns people to a life of povertyand sutreringsimply because its purchasing power devolves primarily from credit which iscreated at no cost as book entries by privately'owned corporations against thereal wealth of the community.

A Closer LookAt Today's Socialists:The SPGB

If you haven't heard of the Sociatist Party of Great Britain that is hardlysurarising, it is diminutive and devotes half its time to promoting socialismaud the other half to attacking an organisation it refers to as "Ihe SocialistFarty of Clapham". According to its literature the SPGB uas reconstituted inJune 1991, (32) and has since then been at war with a rival of the same name.The reader may frnd this amusing, but it is by no means unusual. Inileed, thenastiest hate literature produced by socialists and communists is directedtrailitionally not at either their capitalist oppresson or the mythical fascistmenace but at other socialists. (33)

In its 1995 pamphletSOCIALIST STWIES NO. L6, the SPGB kicks offwitha swipe at the establishment which creates a public n&ich is "docile'n wallowingin "political ignorance, general indifference, apathy and prejudice againstSocialism". (34)

On the very same page it refers to "the so-called communists of Russia" andon the next page makes the stock charge that "Socialism has never been tried'.

lTheir italics.] Obviouslyl-enin,lbotslry, Stalin, and perhaps most of all' B€laKun, would turn in their gpaves ifthey realised that not only had they nevertried socialism but had never even been conmitted to it. I*nin's collectedworks run to 56 volumes, (35) most ofwhich are devoted to espousing the cause

48


of socialism. And Bdla Kun certainly practised socialism, communal bath-

roons and all.on page3, peoplewho do notacceptthefacts of socialism - in particularthe

concept of class struggle - art "mental and social slaves", while those who live

offthe labour of other people are said to be parasites. One of these parasites

is mentioned - but not nemed - on page 19. He (or she) is the anon;mousbenefactorwho donated 920,000 to the Socialist Party of Clapham. Obviouslyhail this person donated this money to the sPGB, the party would have beenrather more restrained, polite even. Perhaps they'd. have addressed theirbenefactor as Comrade Parasite.

on page 6, the new realism of the Labour Party is attacked. The cify elite

are not at all unhappy with Labour now, and may well ditch the lbries at thenextelection. On pages 7-11, the partyoffers an explanation ofthe phenomenon

of inflation. This is caused by the govern-ment pnmping in an excess ofban}notes. Inflation, we are told, is a form of hidden taxation. this is a

common view, and one that is not entirely inaccurate. However, it is not simply

an increase in the money suppty that causes inflation, but an increase in themoney supply out of all proportion to the goods and services available. Also

missi'B from this equation is the little matter of interest rates.It is interest -

in particular, high intercst rates - which cause inflation more than anything

else. Ifthe government needs money it can raise it by taxation, print it (or crcatetle credit), or bomow it at interrest. Ihe most cost efficient metlod is un-floubteilly to create its orm credi! but a stu y of this would take us far beyondthe present analysis. (9O

More nonsense about the class struggle appears on pages 10-1 and thepamphlet endorses the views of Karl Marx (naturatly). on pages 124 is a

discussion of class. It would be poinfless to dissect all the nonsense thatappears here, but the claim that "the function of politicians and their advisorsis to act in the interests of the capitalist class" is more than a little unfair not

only to Labour politicians but to the politicians of all parties throug[out theworldwho have striven, often against mlgb$l vested intercsts, to improve tlelot of the common peoPle. (37)while the SPGB are neither as large nor as nasty as the swl they, likewise,

have nothing to offer the common people, and the adoption of the policies theyadvocate would lead not simply to the destruction of what rcmains of ourrapidly dwinilling frcedoms but to the wrecking of the economy.

49


ChapterEighfi A Straight LookAtBolshevism In Practice

The Revolution Before And After:A Potted History Of B olshevism

The foltowing account - which is largely non'contentious ' has been includedto showwhat sort of men the Bolsheviks were, and the result in practice, ofthe adoption of hard line socialist policies. Ihe word that best sums up theBolsheviks is scnm. For that is preciselywhat these men were. Scum. Iheywerescum after they seized power, and they were scum before they seized power.

Although communist theory goes back to Karl Marx and indeed way backbefore him, the history of Bolshevism begins with Lenin. On May 8, 1887'Lenin's elder brotheq Alexander Ulyanov, uas hanged along with four otherconspirators for plotting to assassinate the Tsar. According to at least onesource, he seems tohavebeen totallyunrepentant, andtherecan belittle doubtthat this had a profound effect on the young Lenin. (1) Lenin took an interestin radical politics himself, andwas active in the Social Democratic Party (theRussian Social Democratic Labour Party).Ihe Second Congress of this partywas heldin Brussels andlondon fromJuly30,1903' anditwas atthis congressthat the split occurred between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. \{hileLeninleilthe Bolshevikfaction,Julius Martovledthe Mensheviks.Atthis timethe Bolsheviks were in the majorify, (2) but by 1908 all the leailing Bolsheviksbar Zinoviev and Kamanev had deserted Lenin. Both men were executed bystalin in 1936, (3) as, incidentally, was the aforementioned Marxist-I-eninistlunatic B€la lhrn. This was Kun's reward for his fanatical devotion to bothLenin and Communism. (4)

In spite of their professed ideal of sharing the wealth, the main priority ofthe Bolsheviks nas to raise money to maintain their organisation and to sprcadtheir ideologr. We should not deride them for this; even organisations whichseekto restrdcture capitalist society on a not-for-profit basis have no altema-

50


tive but towork - for the present - within the confines of the capitalist system.However, as Lenin's biographer points out "The Bolshevik Centre had to bemaintained at all eosts - and money had to be raised by any possible means.n(5) [Emphasis addedJ lhese means included political maniages, forgrngcumency, donations from wealthy sympathisers and, not the least" robbery' inone case with appalling Ioss of life. One wealthy s;mpatliser, the Moscowmi[isnsirc Sava Morozov, subsidised the Bolsheviks to the tune of 12'fi)0rubles a year. (O As with our latter day socialist millionaires, the poor fellowobviously didn't realise just how much the recipients of his largess hated himfor the crime of being rich, nor what sort of fate they had in storc for him.Morozov didn't live long enough to frnil ou$ he sqmmitted suicide in 1905. IIewas said to have left a large legacy for the promotion of Bolshevism; he andmany other bourgeois supported the Bolshevik cause, with lenin's full knowl-edge. (7) this is the equivalent of German Jews frnancing Hitler in the fuIllinowledge of the Nazis'programme of exclusion and expulsion. (8)

Ihe Bolsheviks' criminal methods of raising money were called' acpropria'tions;I*nin's biographer refers to those who objected to expropriation squads- in particular Plekhanov and Martov'as squeamish. (9) Ienin spent most ofhis life exiled abroad. Anothsl lea.ling Bolshevikwho spent a great deal of timein (internal) exilewas Stalin. On one occasion Stalin defended a man who hadrobbed a peasant before an ad hoc court of political exiles. The thief is aproduct of capitalist societyr, he argueil' "Instead of condemning him for hisac! he should be recruited, because men of this type arre necessaryforthe fightto destroy the capitalist order." (10) For a man tike Stalin it was but a shortstep from condoning an act of theft from a poor man for an obviously selfishpurpose to the justification of nurder for a higher purPose. It was he whoorganised the greatest Bolshevik expropriation of all, the Tlflis post officerobbery ofJune 1907.

the sum expropriated here was estimated from 250,0fi) to 341'{X}0 rubles.This rms not so much a robbery as an act of mass murder which involved thekilling and maiming of literally scones of people when the Bolsheviks openedup on a post oflice convoy with guns and bombs. (11) Most of the peoplemurdered during the course of this robberywould have been ordinaryworkingpeople. This terrible act shorw the Bolsheviks in their true colours.

To be scrupulously fair to the Bolsheviks, theywere neither the first nor thelast idealists to resort to criminal activity in order to finance theft higfier

51


puryose. But even Hitler did not resort to such methods, and although shortlyafter his accession he murdered some of his most loyal supporters ' in theRoehm purge - the tSranny of the Nazis was directed alnost exclusively at the

Jews, tle comnunists and other groups they had declared their iihad againsLEven the Nazis didn't tpannise the common peoplewhom theyclaimed, as didthe Bolsheviks, to seekto liberate. (12)

Axelrod and Plekhanov wanted to break with the Bolsheviks over theircriminal activities; Martov even appeared as a witness against them at theparty investigation. (ff!) Unfortunately for the rest of mankind, the Bolshevikssurvived. In May 1912 the partyjournal Pravdawas founded. As most readenswill realise, this has the unfortunate translation of Truth. The Social Demo-cratic Farty's first paper' Islca (ie The Spa*) had been published sinceDecember 1900. It was printed in Germany and smuggled into Rtrssia. (14)

In March 19L7, the Tsar abdicate{ antl a provisional government wasestablished by Prince Lvov. Ihe Lvov government gaveway to that of Kerenslry'who issued a general amnestf, for Communists and other revolutionaries;asluding Iflin (who had been in exile since tle abortive coup of 1900. Irninwas in Switzerlanit at this time; Thotslqywas in NewYork

In l!72, the American Consenative and conspiracy theorist Gary Allelpublished a best selling book called None Dare Call It Conspiraqt in which heclaimedthat the Bolsheviks had been sentinto Russia byWall Street bankers.Ihis claim is not nerr, and has in fact been a cornerstone of anti-Semiticideologr since the tirne of the "Russian" Revolution. Usually the (Jewish)

Bolsheviks are said to have been in the pay of the Intemational Jews of WallStreel It has often boen claimeil that Lenin and even Stalin are Jews; boththese claims are false, (15) and because of this nonsense and the taboos1111eunding the Jewish Question, this subject has been avoided like the plagueby serious historians.

However, in t974rthe established scholar and Revisionist Historian AntonyC. Sutton published a thoroughly documented strtdy, Wall Street and theBolshevikRevolutionrwhichput the involvement of Wall Street bankers in thisafrair into context, in particular Sutton demonstrated that the Gentile firnsof Rockefeller and Morgan were the prime movers rather than the American

Jew Jacob Schiffand the Jewish firm of Kuhn, Loeb. Whatever motives WallStret Insiders may have had for financing their alleged avowed enemy' it isnowhere disputed that the German High Command sent Lenin and his crew

52


into Russia in the famous "sealed train". (16) The Bolsheviks then proceeded

to seize power and give the oppressed people of Russia a heary dose of the

freedom they had promised them. Itwas Lenin, incidentally, who declared thatfneedom is so precious that it must be rationed. (17) Their slogan, he said'must be "Arm the proletariat in order to vanquish, erpropriate, and disarmthe bourgeoisie!" (18) [The reader should contrast this with the activities ofsocialists and communists in the peace movement fherrgh6uf ttre westerndemocracies in the 1950s'80s1.

AII tle Bolsheviks' talk of freedom went out of the window from the day theyseized power. On November t0,19t7, the Soviet Government published adecree curtailing freedom of the press, accompanied by the assurance that therepressive measunes were only temporaly and would become inoperative assoon as the nery r@ime took lirn root. six days later, this was justilied by adecree of the Soviet Central Executive Committee on the gfounds that "There+stablishment of the so+alled freedom of the Pressl viz. the simPle retullof printing offices and paper to capitalists, poisoners of the people's con-science, would be an unpardonable surrender to the will of capital' that is tosay, a counter-revolutionarA measure." (19)

Thrs temporary curtailment of freedom is not unique to the fomer Sovietrdqime. During the Second Worlil lT'ar, most of the freedoms Britons andothers were supposedly fighting to preserve were destroyed. Including, mostespecially, the right to protest against the war itself. (20) Many other freedomswhich were won only by our ancestors spilling their precious blood have beendestroyed into the bargain, usually at the behest of some allegedly oppressed'minority, aided and abetted by socialist fanatics.

whatever, it is not generally realised today that as well as shutting dorm theso-called capitalist press, Ienin and company shut down the socialist opposi'tion. Lenin ordered the disbanding ofWorkers'Opposition groups within theParty, (21") and the great man himself said that to tolerate such oppositionsocialist newspapers nis to cease to be a Socialist...The state is an institutionbuilt up for tle sake of exercising violence. Previously this violence wasexercised by a handfut of moneybags over the entire peoplel now we wanl..toorganize violence in the interests of the people-.." (22) There you have it, wewant to organise violence. David. Shub points out candidly that from May 1918nthere have been no independent newspaperc in Russia. The limiteil rigbtswhich the Liberals and Socialists had enjoyed under autocratic Tsarism were

53


denied to all bylenin." (23) In otherwords, the curewasworse thanthe disease.But there was much worse to come.

Lenin advocated the mass murder of the ruling dynasty, (24) and theRomanovs werr indeed murdered. He also ordered mass terror against theKulaks, (25) and this too-the Bolsheviks carried out. The promised restruc-turing of society didn't simply involve mass murder however, but the ethos ofworking for others, ie for the state. Needless to say, the common people hadother ideas. David Shub tells us that "[t]he peasants refused to plougb theirland, because there was no incentive for cultivating more than was needed. forimmediate village consumption." (26) Substitute the wortl profit for incentivein the previous sentence andyou'Il understandwhy commnni5p,lsocialism hasnever worked and can never work, it runs contrary to human nature. Q7\ lnTiagedy And HoperProfessor Quigley comments on this tragic era of humanhistory and the picture he paints is no better. By 1920, industrial productionrnas only abott l3%o of tle 1913 figure, and money was printed so freely thatthe ruble becanne almostworthless. (28) Thue, the FirstWorldlVarhad causeddevastation, but that would not have accounted for the almost total economiccollapse.

By March 1921, even many die-hard Bolshevils had had enough, and thesailors ofKronstadtrevolted. This revoltwas crushed mercilesslybythatgreatchampion of the working class lhotslry, who put a former Tsarist general incharge of the supprcssion. (29) Ihis was in spite of the sailors refusingto shed'needless blood". (30) When several Red Army regiments mutinied and refusedto fight the sailors, the Cheka shot every frfth soldier. lbotsky personallyordercd the murdersl men werc shot "like ducks in a pond." (31) Never let it beforgoffen rhat these men: Lenin, lbotsky, and in some quarters, even Stalin,are still worshipped as heroes by our contemporary socialists.

After Kronstadt, Irnin reintroduced capitalism under the guise of NewEconomic Policy, (32) because the period of '\Mar Communism", which lastedfrom 1918-21, had proved unmanageable. [We have already touched on thisbrieflyl. 'In 1918 Lenin had regarded private enterlrise as anathema. Now headmitted thatprivate tradewas indispensable forrestoring Russiats economichealth." (33) And he actually called the new system State Capitalism! (34)

54


The Myth Of Stalinism

When lenin ilied rn 1924, a power struggle took place between Stalin andIhotstry. (35) Stalin won, and thotslry fell from grace, was exiledn and finally,murdered in Mexico in furgust 1.940. The expulsion and subsequent murder ofthotslryhas allowedhis followers to portrayhim as a kind. of saintlyfigure, theh 'man face of communism as it nerel the fyranny effected by Stalin has, tosome extent, made this necessary However, having read this far, the readershould be under no illusions as to the true nature of any member of tle unholyftinity of Ienin, Tbotslry and Stalin. These were men who engaged in all mannerof nefarious schemes prior to their accession of power - the Tlflis post ollicerobbery for one - who advocated tenor and suppressed all opposition (eventhe socialist opposition), during their accession, and. after they had consoli-dated ponar, ruthlessly suppressed and murdered even tleir, at one time, mostdevoted followers, in the Kronstadt mutiny. AII thrrce men were totally evil' allthree urerc totally committed to the ideals of communism, and if Lenin hadlived, or if totslqy rather than Stalin had succeeded him, the course of historythough fotlorring a different path, would have been every bit as bloody. More-over, tfie track record of comnunism/socialism has been essentially the samein every other counfrywhere these fiends have come to powen Red China anilCambodia are two equally terrible examples of the success of socialism and the

freedom enjoyed by the people who sulfer under it.The only major difference between Stalin and Tbotslry is that while lbotslry

uas a true internationalist, advocatingworld revolution, Stalinwas both morepractical and more efficient Stalin's slogan was' or might have been enunci-ated as, nCommunism in a single countqr". (3O It appears that the Sovietsgenuinely believed that the lilthy hnperialists had nothing better to do thanplot the overthrow of their gloriou s workers' paradise; this led to the belief thatthe country must be industrialised atbrealneck speed, and that the peasantrymust be broken by terror and reorganised. Everyone who stood in their uayhad to be crushed. (37) But tle reader should have absolutely no doubtnhatsoever that the differences between Stalin and Thotslcywere purelytacti'cal; they sought exactly the same end by dilferent means' and were bothprepared to trample over, and murder, anyone who stood in their way.

55


The same applies to their successors, be theythe New Communist Parfy, theSocialist Workers Farty or any of the hundreds of communist and socialistparties scattered throughout the world today. There is no such ffuing associalism with a human face.

How Socialism Has Survived -TheWest LendsAHand

The dichotomy of Capitalism v Communism which we in the West have beenspoon-fed by leftists and by our own establishments, is not merely a distortionbut is dead nrrong. The history of the triumph of socialism in Russia has beenreuritten to such an extent that there are serious problems with any attemPtto assess it fairly and accurately. We have seen already that the Bolsheviks wereaiderl byWallStr*tlnsiders from the wortl go. Another pleasant liction is thatthe capitalist nations, in particular the United States, sought to crush theSoviets bywhatever means. Again, this is simplynot true.Iluring andafter theterribte famine of 1920-1 which the lunatic pseudo-economics of the Bolshevikshad created, tle American Relief Administration came into the country andfed as many as ten million persons a day (in August 1922). (38)

Throrghout the 1930s it was all but impossible to voice any criticism of theSoviet Union in the United States, in intellectual circles at least Recall theexperience ofAyn Rand, (see page 31). On August 23' 1939' the Soviets signeda non-aggression pact with the Nazis. fess than a fortnight later the SecondWorld War uas underway in eamest, and the Soviet Union's senants in theWest did everything in their power to undermine the war effort. One Britishcommunist, Douglas Hyde -whowas news editor oftheDailyWo*er -wrotpof

"the phony war", as indeed it was, a war that 'bas not our war. It was a warbetween rival imperialisms with several millions of workers in uniform as theunwilling pawns." (39)

In June 1941, Hitler showed himself in his true colours and attacked theSoviet Union. It was only then that the Imperialist War that Douglas Hyde andhis fellow cornmunists spoke of became a glorious struggle against fascism. A

56


new enthusiasm for Soviet Russia sprung up in the West; it is difficult to sayhow much of this was due to rvar propaganda, but for the duration of the restof the warit had a profound effect. It led also to increased economic assistanceto the Soviet Union. The extent of U.S. and more generally Western aid to thealleged avorved enemy was revealed by Stalin himself when he claime4 truth-fully, that '...two-thirds of all the large industrial enterprises in the SovietUnion had been built with United States help or technical assistance.' (40)

The full extent of this aid to the Soviet Union by its capitalist enemyhaslongbeen reliably documented; it does not appear to have been diminished signifr-cantly if at all by the phony red scares of the McCarthy era and the resultingwitch hunts of domestic communists.

Iheworks of Antony Sutton reveal the full extent of Westem (in particularU.S.) technical and other assistance to the Soviet Union; his boola are thor-oughly documented; they cannot be rcfuted, so the powers-that-be do not eventry; the media has largely ignored them. Among other things, Sutton revealsthat in May 1929 the Soviets siped a $13 million deat with the Ford MotorCompany, the plant, later knoum as Gorki, was subsequently converted tonilitary operation. (41) "Evera single Soviet weapon system has semi-conduc-tor technologr which originated in California and which has been bougbt,stolen or acquired from the United States." (42) And, quoting a fomer SovietDefense [sic] Military ofriciak "lVithout U.S. help the Soviet milifary systemwould collapse in [one and a halfl years." (43]

Revealingas this is, the lowdoum on the Soviets'inferiorproductivecapacityis perhaps even mone so. In 1957 the Soviet Union had 33 million telephones,358 per hundrerl personsi the US had 49.8. ln t964, there were 919,000automobiles in the Soviet Union, all produced in Western-built plants. The UShad 71.9 million! (44)

In short, the former Soviet Union was able to survive only because it naspropped up by capitalism for the entire duration of its existence. (45) In otherwords, socialism cannot survive unaided. The full ramifications of this are ofenormous significance; if the entire world werc to be run on socialist lines, itwouldn't run at all. Ihe inevitable result would be the starvation of hundreilsof millions, perhaps billions, of people, as well as their total enslavenent andbrutalisation. World rcvolution would not mean, as lbotslry and companypromised - and probably sincerely believed - the regeneration of man, but aretum to the DarkAges, or even to the Stone Age. (46)

57


Leon Thotslqy: An Amu sing AnecdoteOrlko

Wehave seen the sort of peoplewho make up the socialisteliterandthereaderwill, doubfless, recall FauI Foot's comment that under socialism'most peoplewill get the samen. Just as Paul Foot is not most people, neither rvas Ieonlbotslry, for while he nas living in exile in New York, tlis champion of thedoumtrodden and the oppressed appears to have done verywell for himself. Inhis autobiography which was published in 1930, thotslryurote that all mannerof rumours were circulated about him, but 'My only profession in New Yorkvas that of a revolutionary socialist." (47) In practise this meant u'riting forthe small circulation emigr6 press and gving a few lectures. Ihe income hewould have derived from this does not taily with his lifestyle at that time;Antony Sutton finds lhotstcy's explanation unconvincing; (48) another authorbelieves that lbotsky may have dabbled in the frlm industry. (49)

I{hefher or not 1tris shsmpion of the working class uas indeed bankrolledby American bankers - Jewish or otherwise - orwhether he was at one time anaspiring Kirk Douglas (or more likely Charlie Chaplin), he certainly appearsto have lived well in capitalist America. Ihe thotskies rented a house and werea IiffIe disappointed when their Negro janitor absconded with the rent (50)Howeve.4 their faith in human naturewas revivedwhen theyfound both theirrent and their propertywhich at first they thought had disappeared.lbotslqyurote that The janitor had taken the noney of the tenants who had alreadyreceived their receipts; he ditl not mind robbing the landlord, but he wasconsiderate enough not to rob the tenants." He and his wife were deeplytouched: nit seemed as if a coruer of the veil that concealed the black problemin the United States had lifted.' He called the janitor "A delicate fello#. (51)Doubtless the landlord had harsher words for him.

One reason tle lbotskies lived so well in the United States uras because LevDavidovich spent a lot of his time poncing off socialism's staunchest suppor-ters. In L930, henrote "In the United States there is a large class ofsuccessfuland semi-successful doctors, Ianyers, dentists, engineers, and the like whodivide their precious hours ofrest between concerts by European celebrities

58


and the American Socialist part5r." (52) It is people like this who have always

been the backbone of the socialist movement. And people like this who have

always been the first to go up against thewall come the rcvolution. Incidentally'

throughout his lifer lhotslry seens to have had no or little trouble moving

aboutf how manyrrorkerf at that time could afford to move from the Soviet

Union to the United States and back? How many of tlem could have afforded

to travel to spain, and to Mexico, and to take their families with them?

totslrywas far from the only such "revolutionary" who flitted from country

to countrywith apparent ease and little or no declared incomel as stateq L€nin

spent much of his life in exite. Other socialists have devoted enormous time

uid "fo"t

to stirring up trouble, and organising expensive conferences and

demonstrations: (53) where did the money come from? where does it come

from?Returning to Lev Davidovich, one of the people who entertainedthe thotskies

*, u """tuio

Dr M. Mrs lbotslcy and her sons were taken out for jaunts bythe

good doctorts wife, and on one occasion when the happy party visited a tea

ioom the boys asked their mother: '\ilhy doesn't the chaulfeur come in?" (54)

How could anyone have ever given these revo lutionaies the time of day?

Not that it was all play and no work for everybody's favourite working class

hero. totslry studied the economic history of the United States and found that

e:rports grew during the war. The growth uras so great that it astoundeil him.

ftir r""-r to have led him to the belief tlat capitalism wants wan (5O Of

course, capitalists often do profit from war, but before they can so profrt from

a war, ihere has to be somebody to start one. Certainly socialism has started

morc than its fair share of wars this century. Andwe should never forget that

the likes of lhotsky and Lenin are at war with us all of the time; whether you

realise it or not, whether you want to confront tlem or nof they are frghtingyou unrrcmittingly in the class war.

Interestingly,lbotslry gfosses over Kronstadt in his autobiography; there is

no mention here of the rebellion proper. And certainly no mention of shooting

workers tike ducks in a pond, probably because such "untypical" socialist'in'

spired brutalify would not have gone doum too well with his concert'going

doctor friends in the American Socialist Party.Sevenyears later, Thotskypublished a damning indictment of socialismrThe

Rwolution Betrayed.. (5O In the first chapter he asks what has been achieved,

and concludes not a lot "In thebest metal foundry, according to the acknow'

59


ledgment of its director, the output of iron and steel per individual worker isa tlird as nuch as the average output of American foundries.n (57) He refersto the dying away of the state as a "sociological theorem"; (58) and states baldlythat nln a communist sociefi the state and moneywill disappean lheirgradualdying avay orrght consequently to begin under socialism." (59) It is now monethan half a centura since totslry's assassination, and three quarters of acentury since the glorious rcvolution he and his kind foisted onto tfie Russianpeople, and to some extent onto the rest of mankind. Thewithering arvay of thestate is no neaner than it ever was, but still lhotslry's acolytes continue toproclaim that it is just around the corner and that when it does anive all willbe mitkand honey.\ilhich is surelyproof enough that socialism is less a sciencethan a religion.

60


Chapter Nine: More About The Media

Who Controls The Past Controls TheFuture - The Media Under Socialism' 1

A charge often made by the far left is that the Westem media is controlled bya handful of super-rich corporations hellbent on serving the interests of therich. Fhequently, one hears expressions like "the Tory press". This is a seriouscriticism and one the cument uriter will not attempt to gloss over. Unfortu-nately, the inevitable outcome of uncontrolledlaissezfaire is that some cor?or-a6ons and inilivirluats will become not only incredibly wealthy but incrediblypower{ulrandthattheywillattemptto exertthis power, sometimes successfully'in ways which are detrimental to the interests of the majority. If nothing else,such power allows them to buy favourable publicity, or, as is morrc often thecase, to suppress ne$4sworthy stories because theywould embanass ' or indict- the powerful. Also, in most if not all Western countries - and many others '

the mainstream media has long since become part of the establishment. Thisis a de facto politicat reality which is not worth seriously debating.

Accepting this, the socialists' cure is, as ever' worse than the disease. Theirargument is that the media is controlled by a few vested interests, so power

should be taken out ofthe hands ofthe few and placed in the hands ofthe one'(ie the state). When the state controls all outlets of information, it is able toexert a terri$ing and literally malevolent influence over not only all communi-cation, but over the minds of its subjects. Ilere is what actually happened in

the Soviet Union.In May 1920, a famous photograph was taken of Lenin adilressing a crowd

of troops. (1) In this photograph, thotslry and Kamanev apPear in the back'ground. These two were later painted out. (2) One of the gfeatest atrocities of

the second \ilorld war was the Katp Forest massacre of some 14,500 Polishofficers andintellectuals. (3) The remains of only4l53 ofthe nenwere actuallyfound, (a) but there can be no doubt whatsoever that theywere all murdered

by the communists. At the kangaroo court that was Nuremberg, the soviets

6t


tried to paln offthis atrocify on the Nazis; this pretencewas kept up longaftertle war, and involved, among other things, the faking of documents (eg letters)which were planted on the victim s to prove that they were still alive in 1941 . (5)The fact that the Soviet Union was able to effect such a cover-up for so long isdue primarily to the monopoly control of the media. (6) Incidentally, thevictims of Katyn included many joumalists, which should give all mediasocialists food for thought.

The death of Stalin changed nothing with regard to Soviet methods ofdisinformation. In February 1956, Stalin's successor, Krushchev, denouncedthe great man to the Communist hierarchy. His speech was leaked to the Westandwas the subject of lengtlyarticles intheNewYorkTirnes onlune 4-5 ofthesame year, (see below). Stalin was said to have created a personality cultaround himself. Thus the Soviet Union entered a new phase, that of de-Stalini-sation, and history was rewritten. Stalin's name was purged from boohs whichwere withdrawn and reuritten Afilm,Ldnine m 1918rwas cut from 2 hours 13minutes to t hour 35 minutes. Almost all the scenes involving Stalin were cut,and it was reissued as I inine en Octobre. Other films got the same treatment,including films in Western libraries in which portraits of Stalin appeared; theywere replaced with portraits of Lenin or Marx. This was done free of chargeon the pretext that theywere being restored. (7) Let us here take a brief lookat the changing of the guard in Moscorv.

Krushchevon Stalin

Krushchev's address was actually made on February 24, L956 in a closedsession ofthe 1lventieth Congress. Ihe first news ofthe address and an outlinenas publisheil in the New York Times, March 15, 1956. (8) The full text of thespeech was published by the U.S. State Department on June 4, andan editedversion of the text appeared in the Na,vYork Time.r the following day. The actualaddress ran to more than fiftypages. Dr Fbed Schwarz said this was perhapsthe most remarkable speech ever made. (9)

Among other things, Krushchev revealed that Stalin planned to "do awaywith" (10) Molotov and Mikoyan, andwould have done if he hailn't died. He

62


changed the law to permit the conviction of Old Bolsheviks on the basis ofunsupported confessions. Stalin had sought to eliminate all the older men andreplace them with young sycophants, to help erase the record of his past crines.He was iporant of agriculture (which led to the rise of Lysenkoism and theresulting disaster for Soviet agriculturt). He practised the mass repression ofboth enemies and loyal communists and was so paranoid that he saw spieseveryrvhere. (11) Seven tlousand six hundred and sevenfy-nine people hadbeen rehabilitated since Stalin's death, though many of them were alreadydead.

It was Statin who originateil the concept of "enemy of the people', and hissupposed military genius was nothing more than self'praise. Krushchev re'ported also on mass deportations, and documented many outright murders.Statin is said to have signed the execution orders in advance for defendants

[sic] the police had not yet charged.Ninety-eight of the one hundred and thirty-nine members and candidates of

the Central Committee who were elected at the Seventeenth Congress werearrested and shot, mostly in 1937-8. Krushchev reasoned that because 60%oofthemwereworkers theywere honest Communists whowere slandered. This isperhaps the most frightening aspect of the doctrine of class wan Dr FredSchwarz comments that if Stalin had murdered only those Communists whohad not been korkers", neither Krushchev nor any other indoctrinated com'munist would have seen anything wrong with this. (12) A total of 1,108 of the1p66 delegates to the Seventeenth Congress with voting or advisory rights werecharged with anti-revolutionary activity. (13) I"€t us now retur:n to the subjectof the media under socialism.

Who Controls The Past Controls TheFuture - The Media Under Socialism - 2

One commentator has written that "The falsification of photographs coneseasily to those govemments and elites that seek to be the sole interpreters ofhistory and have a monopoly on the information media." (14) This is un-

63


doubtedly true, but the claim by author Alain Jaubert that this sort ofthingcan't happen in a denocracy outside of war (L5) because of "pluralify ofinformation, freedom of access to sources, freedom of expression..." is simplynot true, (16) as anyone who has studied the continued faking, disseminationand endorsement of Holocaust propaganda will surely realise. (17)

Ironically, the latest battle for state control (or regulation) of the media, istaking place largely in that great bastion of capitalism, the United States. Theadvent of the Intemet has enabled people to communicate cheaply and instan-taneouslywith people on the other side of the world. This means flat, in theoryat least, it will be impossible in the future for any government to hush up majorembarrassing incidents such as the March 1993 siege at Waco, Tbxas, (18)which resulted in such appalling loss of life, and is widely perceived by eventhe less conspiratorially-minded of Americans as an act of state-sponsoredmass murder. (19)

In the past year or so (20) atl manner ofnonsense has been circulated aboutbomb manuals being made available through the Internet; (21) an anti-Semitichate game called. Concentration Camp Manager Q2) in which you win by gassing[sic] the most Jews in the most economical method; child pornography, (23)and much more. It is difticult to believe that all this nonsense has been theresult of sensationalist tabloid or simply irresponsible jour:nalism. It is quitelikely that many such scare stories are started wilfully as part of the MarxistHegelian dialectic of crisis management. (24)

.I/ the numerous conpanies which sell Intemet services can light off theattempts at regulation by all manner of collectivists and hatemongers, thencensorship of the Internet in any meaningful sense (if not of anything else) mayeventually come to an end. Needless to say, such a scenario is overly optimistic.Under socialism, any Internet providersn as far as they existed, would be totallyunder state control, and free communication would go right out of the windowalong with all our other freedoms.

Another, pleasing offspin of the Internet - for budding authors - is that it isnowpossible foranyonewho can afford a computeranda modem, andtheveryreasonable connection charges, to linkup. Which means that anyone can nowbecome a published poet, writer, or 'zine editor. There is no guarantee thatanyone will read your outpourings, much less pay for themn but this fairtyrecent exponential leap in household technologr has d.one more to level theplayrng field for the budding artiste tlan socialism has ever done.

64


A subject not entirely unrelated to the Internet is the provision ofpostal andtelecommunications services. The socialists use a number of arguments here:such services mustbeproided bythe state because onlythe state can be trustedto deliver tle mail on time; because this is a vital service and shouldnot be runfor profit (this is a well worn n on-sequitur); (25) because of the confidentialityof such communications and the degree of security inyolved.

This latter argument is in fact a very good argument against state control ofthe mail and telecommunications systems. It is far easier for the state to openyour mail and to eavesdrop on conversations than for a private company to doso, and again, the fragnnentation of such services bytheir being farmed out toprivate enterprise does reduce the ability of the state to control us all. Another,most pleasing side effect of the privatisation of telecommunications, is theresulting increased efficiency and reduced running costs. This is due entirelyto the advent of competition.

Fleedom Of Speech Under Socialism

Ihe previous section makes this sub-heading seem rather superfluous. Wehave already discussed academic freedom (or the lack thereof) under social-ism. Exactly how much freedom of speech would exist under socialism can beascertained from the freedom of speech today's socialists permit their allegedilearlly enemies, in particular so-called racists and fascists. The slogans "Nofree speech for fascists" and 'Smash fascism, by any means necessary", (26)and variations thereof, sum it up in a nutshell. In practice, anyone who opposessocialism can and will be smeared or denounced as a fascist, including thepolice, and this isn't all simply slogans, rhetoric or ignorance, many of themreally do believe that anyone who doesn't share their particular - and oftenbizarre -Weltanschauungis araving Nazi. We have seen earlier thatwhen theytook power the Bolsheviks shut dorvn the socialist opposition as well, lrecalttheir renarks about "The re-establishment of the so-called freedom of thePress..." Q711.1\ere is not a ha'porth of dilference between the originatBolsheviks and their spiritual heirs.

65


The Power OfAdvertising

Much is made by socialists of the rampant consumerism which exists undercapitalism, and the supposedly manipulative advertising that goes hand inhand with it. Again, unlike some capitalist apologists, the cunent writer doesnot dispute that such things exist.

That notwith5141ding, the power ofadvertising, if not the power ofthe mediain general, has been greatly exaggerated. The truth is that tho'lgh the publiccan at times be extremely fickle, it can also be taken for a ride, as can all of us.Just as astrologers record only their successes, so do the detractors ofadver-tising record only its successes. The success of marketing is due in large partnot so much to advertising as to market research. Mega<orporations spendenormous sums of money on market research, so one would expect them tomake the right marketing decision occasionally. (28) Even so, the failurrcs aremany: there are companies that specialise in remaindered books; few and farbetween arc the fiIm mega-stars who do not make at least one film that sinkslike a lead balloon, or the rock band that doesn't make an album that flopsbadly. Even scandal doesn't aln'ays sell, as the rock star Michael Jackson foundout when he nas accused of indecently assaulting young boys. Although nocharges wene eyer frIed against him, his sponsorship deals dried up virtuallyovernighL

Likewise, products frequently flop; the current writer has personal experi-ence of this. A few years ago I was an extra in a TV commercial for a chocolatebar. Ihe company - Cadbury's, I think - hired a West End theatre for two daysand literally hundreds of extras [incluiling myselfl. (29) I received about f,70for twelve hotrswork (although I was there for far less than that). On top ofthat everyone received f4 lunch allowance and a free breakfast. (Nice work ifyou can get it). Tio film this commercial - about 30 seconds worth of film - andto screen it, must have cost tle advertiser literally hundreds of thousands ofpounds. As far as I recall, I saw it once on Tf, then it sankwithout trace. I can'teven recall the name of the chocolate bar itwas made to advertise. The readercan argue that this evidence is merely anecdotal, but if he looks around he willfrnd many similar examples of commercial flops.

66


Capitalism's frequent flops are due to many factors, not all of then intrinsic,but under capitalism the public are the final arbiters of taste, or the lack of itIf the public wants crap, then the man who gives them crap will be wellreuarded. Under socialism the rulers think they know better than the publicwhat the public wants, and indeed what it should have. Knowing now what youdo about Comrades Lenin, Stalin and Thotslry, don't you think that it would bebetter for all concerned if you rather than they decided what you rnant to spendyour hard-eamed money on?

67


Chapter Ten: Monopoly, MarketingAndEmployment

OnMonopolies

Aswe have alreadypointed out,tle inevitable outcome of uncontrolledlaissez

faire is that some corporations become both incredibly wealthy anil increrliblypowerful. In some cases this can lead to monopoly, or more usually duopoly orotigopoly, inwhich the market is dominated by one, two, or a few such giants.(1) It is a widely held belief that once monopoly status or s omething approach'ing it has been achieved, the monopolist can exploit his consumers withimpunity. Socialists believe that this is a powerful argument for state owner-ship of major industries. Like many widely helil beliefs, this is urong, as is thebelief of socialists that the state can run such industries better, more efficientlyand more fairly (whatever that means) than private enterlrise.

The word monopoly has connotations of power, but a monopoly is noteverything it is crackedup to be, (as I toowfrom personal experience). Manypublishers have monopoly rights on certain nagazines and books; this doesn'tgUarantee that theywill be successfu[ magazines go to the wall everyyear and,likewise, books are remaindered. (2) In the mid'7Os, a man named Rubikinvented an amusing toy, the Rubik cube, which caught on like wildlire for afew months and made him a wealthy man. Although, he owned the patent, theRubik cube was manufactured by many sompanies. But of course' if he haddecirled to manufacture it himself and the public couldn't see the novelty, hecould have had all the Rubik cubes in the world and they wouldn't have doneeither him the slightest good or the public the slightest harm.

If one company had a monopoly of an essential ptoduct, bread for example,yet sold loaves of such poor quality or at such exorbitant prices, it wouldn't be

long before the pubtic realised that bread isn't quite the staple food that it is

meant to be, and would abandon it in favour of something else. cake perhaps!

The increased demand for cake would mean that, through the familial 6a1'ftsfmechanism its price would rise, and this would stimulate both production and

68


investment. This would lead eventually to an actual lowering of prices as theeconomies of scale came into play, and as companies pared back their profitsper unit due to the increased competition; they would buy more and sell forless, making their profits offtheir incrcased turnover.

An equally Iikely scenario is that if the price of bread were to go through theroof, many people would start baking their own. Doubtless some, probably ona local scale at first, would begin to sell it. Eventually this would lead to newcompanies starting up, and the bread monopolywould be broken. The monop-olist would then have no alterrnative but to improve the quality of his productand/or lower his prices, or face bankruptcy. Llltimately it is the consumer whois sovereign.

In practice, the only way for a manufacturer to preserve a monopoly is touse state coercion, ie to lobby the government to pass laws restricting the entryqf g6mpetitors into the marketplace. This can and does happen. In the UnitedStates, a plethora oflocal taxes is the result not ofsocialists in the legislaturebut of pressure from businessmen. In the words of Professor Quigley: "Busi-ness hates competition. Such competition might appear in variousfoms...[making] planning difficult, and [jeopardising] profits. Businessmenprefer to get together with competitors so that they can cooperate to exploitconsumers to the benefit of profits instead of competingwith each otherto theinjuryof prolits." (3)

In October 1995, two drug manufacturers were granted a High Courtinjunction against theASDA supemarket chain to prevent it from sellingtheirdrugs at discount prices. They claimed their profits were being damaged. (4)Af least theywere being honest! The drug companies have in fact been opera-ting a nice liffle cartel for manyyears. (5) Socialists would have us believe thatthe likes of the ASDA supermarket chain - and its rivals - are capitalistparasites (6) who should be taken over by the government, but what we see hereis actually a clear example of the collusion referred to by both ProfessorQuigley and Adam Smith, not to promote laissez faire, but to destroy it. (7) Itis, is it not, truly amazin g, that a court of law, and a civil court at that shouldhave the power to order a company to raise its prices?

Another nice litfle racket is the Net Book Agreement; it doesn't take muchto start publishers and distributors bleating about how beneficial that is andhow it is essential to protect the consumer. Again, this is vested interest talkingrather than concern for the publicwell-being.

69


Ihe bigest rip-offs of all are the tariffs which countries impose on cheapimports.We in Britain are toldthatwe must be protected from wickedJapanesebusinessmen who are plotting to destroy our industries by selling us cheap TVsets, video recorders and other merchandise which we as consumers have noaltemative but to buy. (8) Thriffs are imposed on Japanese and other goods toprotect the home market, to protect iobs and for other fanciful reasons. I)oesthe consu'ner really need protecting against a company that will sell him abetter product at a cheaper price? Of course not! But the govemment likestarilfs, they raise money, in the short telm at any rate; tley create make-workjobs: extra posts for customs ofricers, product inspectors and the like. Andtheysavejobs,wearetoldrwhich iswhyorganisedlabourlikesthem.Therealitythough is that tariffs may save jobs in the short term, but it is the consumerwho suffers ultimately. If consumers want to buyforeign-made goods theyhaveto pay the tariff (ie a tax) to the government, which is money they might wellhave spent on something else. Or they might have invested it. The moneyconsumers would have spent or invested elsewhere would have benelited thelocal economy in other ways. (9)

Ihe Japanese in particular have long been criticised for their efficiency asmanufacturens. Yes, for their efficiency! And for a smiety that makes so muchnoise about the evils of racism, hostility to Japanese manufacturing andcommercial efliciency manifests itself in a curiously xenophobic manner. In1983, one author, a certain Malvin Wolf, claimed in a paranoid book that Japanwas out to dominate theworldwith itseconomic nationalism. Thethemeof Thefapanese Conspiracy (which might more accurately have been titledThe Proto-cols oftheLeamedElders of Nippon),is thata sinisterentitycalledtheMinistryof International Thade and Inilustry (MITI) had hatched a plot to dominateworliltrade bytheevenmore sinisterpractice of subsidising theirexportswhileprotectingtheir home markets from cheap imports. (L0)

Maflin Wolfs ravings were nothing new though, a full half century beforehis nonsense appeartd in print, Australian manufacturers were complainingthat Japan was dumping cheap goods in Australia, and calling for a tarifftoprotect Australian industry against this outrageous practice. (11) DidAustra-lian manufacturer really want to protect Australian industry or their ownprofits?

By making a foreign produced product more expensive, the tariff also makesthe same home produced product cheaper, but only in relative tems, not in

70


real terms. So the consumer who buys the relatively cheaper home producedproduct is actually subsidising not only wasteful government bureaucracy butlocal businessmen and labour. (12) In short, he is subsidising inefficiency. Theultimate lunacy is to have both tariffs and export subsidies, for surely there isnothing quite so absurd as to tax foreigners in order to subsidy our inellicientindustries and at tle same time to tax our own people in order to subsidyinefficient foreigners.

Under socialism, a state monopoly of goods and services would result ingross inelliciencyn a bloated and far more wasteful, ineflicient and unnecessarybureaucracythanwe have even noq andno consumer choice at all.Whowoulddecide what products to manufacture? Who would decide what llavours tomake ice cream, what clothes women will be wearing next summer, what sizeor design ofcars people will want to drive, and so on?

We will end this short discussion of monopolies with a lengthy quote fromthe Libertarian economist trbederick Hayelc "Our frredom of choice in acompetitive society rests on the fact that, if one person refuses to satisfy ourwishes we can tun to another. But if we face a monopolist we are at his nercy.And an authority directing the whole economic system would be the mostpower{ul monopolist conceivable. While we need probably not be afraid thatsuch an authorify would erploit this power in the manner in which a privatemonopolist would do so, while its purpose would presumably not be theextortion of maximum financial gain, it would have complete power to decidewhat we arc to be given and on what terms. It would not only decide whatcommodities and services were to be available, and in what quantities; itwouldbe able to dircct their distribution between districts and groups and could, ifitwished, discriminate between persons to any degree it liked. Ifwe rememberwhy planning is advocated by nost people, can there be much doubt that thisporiler would be used for the ends of which the authority approves and toprevent the pursuits ofends which it disapproves." (13)

In other words, when the state has a monopoly, you will dance to the tune ofthe people who control the state. Indeed, we have seen this very often in thepolitical arena; left wing councils have refused to hire halls to racists andfascists. There have been manycases of people being dismissed from theirjobson account of their political affiliations, (14) or simply for holdingracist vierlvs.It goes without saying that this sort ofnonsense can be, will be, and indeed has

71


been, extended to people other than die-hard racisrs and their fellow travellers.Including smokers!

Profes sor Rubilq MarketingAndAdvertising

On page 68 we mentioned the inventor of the Rubik cube. Although the Rubikcube has amusement value and little else, there are many people who havesimilar ideas be they useful or useless. A lot ofthese people are not particularlyweatthy, and lack the wherewithal to bring their ideas to the markeL Often itis not simplyacase of throwingmoneyaftera goodidea, because itis nanifestlynot true that if you make a better mouse trap the world will beat a path to yourdoor. An idea or invention has to be marketed and often advertised, otherwiseits prospective buyers will not know that it exists or why they should buy iLMarketing and advertising are highly specialised fields. Tbue, anyone can placea classified ad in the local newspaper to sell a car or whatever, but a productn&ich has national or worldwide potential, and which may have a limitedshelflife, (15) has to be marketed and/or advertised efliciently.

In a free market the inventor can take his contraption (or whatever) to aventure capitalist (incluiling a bank) and to a marketing company, advertisingagency, or to whomever he sees fit. All these people have to be paid; bearing inmind thatthereis no guaranteethat even awonder{ul contraptionwill succeedcommercially, a venture capitalist who is prepared to risk his ovm moneywillexpect a high retum. Fbequentlythis leads to misunderstandings and disputesbetween the client and the agent. Tlvo fields inwhich tlere are often acrimon-ious disputes are the music business and professional boxing.

lnLgg4,therockmusician George Michael lostan action in the High Courtagainst his company Sony; he had claimed that Sony was stifling his artisticfreedom. (16) This action saddled him with an estimated 92.7 million lepl bill.(171 Many musicians felt Michael was in the right and atlmired his principletlstand. Ihe court took a different view, and in his 273 page ruling, Mr Justice

72


Parker ruled tlat the contract, which Michael had siped in 1988' was nreason-

able and fair'. (18)It is all too easy for musicians and others to portray such a battle as a replay

of David and Goliath, to whit, an enotmous corporation riding roughshod overits artists. Granted that Michael was (and remains) a big name and that hesincerely believed he had fua oppressed,itis an undisputed fact that he wasable to afford to bring, and lose, such an action. How many of us have so muchmoney thatwe can afford to tlrow away nearlythree million pounds to preserveour artistic fircedom? How many rock musicians and bands who were notmaking George Michael's mega-bucks would have happily traded places withhim and allowed the company to dictate its ouar terms?

The judge said that Michael had been poorly advised by his team. PunditJonathan King (himself a fonner perfomer) said Michael had sold his soulto the Devil. Hewould have been a Greekwaiter otherwise. (19)

Then there are the innumerable disputes between boxing promoters/mana-gers and professional tighters. Whilst it is undoubtedly true that sharks canbe found in all professions, is it reatly true that there are more to the squaremile in boxing? Surely a promoter who invests in a frghter, payrng for hishaining his board, his fares, and paying the fighter as well, is entifled to anabove average returr?

I,et us brieflyreview both fields: boxing and music. Apromoter or managermay invest heavily in a fighter, whose career could be ended at any time if hesulfers an iqiury. (20) A rccord company may spend enormous sums of moneyfinancing and promoting a band. There is no guarantee that any particularfrghter will become a world champion, or any sort of champion; similarly thereis no guarantee that any particular bandwill become a mega'success' or breakeven. Because the failures are many, the investor must recoup his lossesthrough his successes as well as reaping his rewards through tlem.

Ihe most notorious boxing promoter in the world is Don King' he of theelectric haircut. (21) King has been investigated by the authorities more thanonce for his alteged sharp practices. Even so, there are some Peoplewho speakvery highly of Don King. One such person is the British fight manager andpromoter Fhank Wamen, u&o in November 1989, was gunned donm in an EastLondon strcet.Years later he tolil a British boxing maga"ine that the veryfirstphone call he had taken after the assassinafion attempt had been from aconcemed Dsn King. Wamen commented thatyou remember things like that.


Q2) Leaingaside Warren's revealing comment, is it really such a sin for Kingto make two million dollars for himself and only one for a fighter when thatfrghter might not have made a cent on his own?

One might ask in response to all this, what is the socialist altemative?Probably under socialism boxing witl be banned, at least as a professionalsport, and there will be even more discontented musicians around undersocialism than there are now, because only those bands who are given the stateseal of approval will be rewarded with contracts; what this will be is anybody'sguess, but presumably the traditionally senif lyrics of rock anthems will beanathema under socialism's political correctness. It goes without saying toothat there will be no repetition of George Michael v Sony, because the GeorgeMichaels of this worldwho are siped up by the state record companywill haveneither artistic freedom nor the wherewithal to tight for it.

At this point let us return briefly to the Rubik cube. Although its inventor'Professor Erno Rubik, patented his invention in Hungary as long ago as 1975,(23) itwas reported in September 1981, that the Ideal Toy Company (which

held the joint coppight) had brought an action in the High Court against analleged initator. Ideal - who were also the licenced distributors - were said tohave lost around f,5 million sales to their alleged fi'val. Q4) Obviouslywe aretalking about big moneY here.

Socialism And Unemployment

One of the recurrentcises of capitalism has been so-called unemplolment. Isay so-called because it is taken for granted by alk economists, politicians,labour leaders...that full emplolment is desirable, and that this should be thefrrst priority of any govemment, along with keeping inflation down. We cannotdiscuss the Social Credit theories of Major Douglas here for want of space; itwill sufrice to say that emplo;m.ent for employment's sake is as undesirable asitis unnecessary.Ihe desire toeffectfull employment stems fromthefallaciousbetiefthat the purpose ofthe financial system is to act as a system ofpnnisfu-ment and reuard.We have already discussed at some length the failings of thesocialisVcommunist system because of its erosion of incentives as much as its

74


inability to transmit market information. There is though a vely stark dif'ference between allowing people to enjoy the fruits of their otm labours andthe aforementioned system of punishment and reward that the financial

system has become.Theproblem that society faces is that exponential advances in technologr

have allowed us to increase output per man to an absolutely staggering extentover the course of the Tlventieth Century. One of my favourite snippets ofeconomic information is a quote I foundintheNew Scientisf forApril1992: "InTIIE 1950s. an electronic circuit that could store a single'bit'of information

cost more than sl. lbday, a pennywill buy 5000 of them." (25) This is a problem?

It is if the only methods of |istributing purchasing polver to the communityare wages, salaries and dividends. The increase in effrciency and Productivitybrought about by the micro-chip revolution has not been effected right acrossthe boardo and obviously thert will always be industries and professions whichare labour intensive, (26) nursing for example. However, the full ramifrcationsare that in the future, there will be an increasingly massive surplus of labour'particularly unskilled labour. Indeed, any unemployed person over the age of

ibout thirty with a less than impressive CV who has ever tried to find a

lucrative job will already know exactlywhat I mean.

Socialism And The UnemPloYable

Without linancial reform, as technolo5r progresses we will see the increasedpolarisation of society between the haves and the have-nots. Ihose in htghlypaidtechnical jobswill be taxed heavilyto pay for the unemployed,while tlosewithout socially useful skills will eke out an existence as best they can. Theranks of the unemployed will be swelled by those whom no employer - noemployer in his right mind - would willingly employ. This includes, but is notlimited to: the criminal element, heavy drinkers, dossers and drop'outs.Socialism promises these people jobs; itwould be more realistic to accept the

fact that some people are more trouble than they are worth and simple pay

them a flividenil provided they keep their proverbial noses clean. Undercapitalism the tendency has been to try to force them into taking literally any

l5


job, faiting which their benelits will be cut off. The culrent uriter does notapprove of this and indeed opposes it vigorously. But the socialist altemativeof work for all is no altemative at all.

Remember Thotsky's maxim that under socialism who does not work shallnot eat becomes who does not obey shall not eat? lbrrible as the future is forthe unemployable under capitalism in the 21st Century it will be far moreterible under socialism. Because under socialism, it is not simply the sociallyinadequate, the unkempt, the recidivist, the wino...who are unemployable.Under socialism, anyone rvho does not obey is unemployable. Living proof ofthis are the sundry hate canpaigns that have been mounteil against so'calledracistsby'anti-racisf" socialist fanatics andtheir fellowtravellers, (seenote 14).As with any and every other freld of human activity, people can and should workto reform the system, to repeal repressive laws, to improve the lot of theworkers, of women, of children, and of the old and infim, etc. But whateverapproach is ailopted towards the so'called problem of unemploSmenf social'ism is not the answer.

Minimum Wages And Price Controls

It will not have escaped your notice dear reader, that while the likes of CedricBrorm (see page 44) arepaid obscene salaries, a lot ofworkers in Britain andelsewhere can barely sulvive on their pay.In addition to this, there are literallymilliels of people who are either unemployed or sick or who are dependent onbenefrts - state hand outs - for one reason or another. The tendency in recentyears has been to withdraw benefit from ths unsmployed on any pretext in orderto force them into taking any availablejob, however poorly paid or unsuitable.I will not dwell on this here because although the system defrnitely needsrrcforming socialism is not the answer in this case any more than it is in anyofthe previous sases we have discussed.

One of the schemes socialists - and indeed many others - advocate in orderto improve the lot of poorer people and the truly oppressed workers is the,minimumwage. Ihis sounds a goodideain theory after allrwhowouldn'twanta minimum wage guaranteed by law which no employer could fail to paf At

76


the time of writing a minimum wage of around f,3 to S4 per hour is being mootedbytheLabourFart;l,and eventhatisn'tmuch.Ina free - orlargelyfree -market,r;vage rates arc determined by market forces. A minimum wage can be eithergreater than or Iess than or the same as the rate determined by the markel Ifthe minimrn wage set by the govemment (or the relevant quango) is equal toor less than the rate determined by the market there is no point setting it. Iffor argument's sake the govemment were to set an absurdly Iow rate, say 50pper hour, for which no one in his right mind would worl and which no onecould possibly exist on, then there wouldn't be any point at all in setting one.

In practice, the only purpose of bringing in and enforcing a minimum wage;. 16 ssmpel employers to pay above the market rate. Again, this sounds goodfor people in extremely poorly paid jobs, but if the employer can't alford to paysuch a rate then these people will be thrown out of work If that is not clear,imagine ntat would happen in the government declared that catering workershad to be paid a minim 'rn wage of f,100 per hour and that any employer whodidn't pay such a rate would be thrown into gaol. Is there any caf6, restaurantor five star hotel that coulil pay any of its workers such a wage? Obviously not,because businesses generate income by selling goods and services, and thegoing rate for a bacon sandwich at the present time is about a pound" t&ichmeans that no catering establishment in the countrywould be able to pay suchabsurdly high uages.

VVith a more realistic minimum wage the problem would still exis* ifemployers couldn't afford to pay the going rate they would either have to a)employ people clandestinely at below the market rate or b) not employ themat all. In short minim ur wages destroyjobs rather than either create them orprotect oppressed workers. (27)

Allied to minimum wages are price controls. Like ninimum uages they don'tworlq and they have the added drawback, that, running contrary to humannature, tley encourage black market activity and thereby criminalise a largesection ofthe population. Price controls (and rationing) don'twork becausewhercver there is a demand, there are people who are willing to supply it, andagain it is ttre market that is the principal deterninant of price. (28) Ifproducers are precludeilbylawfrom sellingbelowacertain pricetheywillsoonbe undercut by their less scrupulous competitors. If on the other hand they arenot permitted to sell above a certain price they will either not sell at all or coneto some other arrangementwitl their customers, eg perhaps theywilltake part

77


of the palment in cash offthe books. Again, all that happens is that businessis hampered and otherwise industrious people are criminalised.

A brief mention here of rationing. It is well documented that the in the formersoviet union comtption was endemic and that anyone who wanted to obtaingoods or services promptly (or of a quatity the state could not supply) had togrease a few palns. An extreme example of the ill effects of rationing uas theoil crisis in the 70s. shortages of oil in the united states werc not caused bythe Arab producer states rrestricting supply, or bumping up prices, theywerecaused by the us govemment's affempts to respond to the cnsis by imposingdomestic controls. The best nay to react to such a cnss is to ipore it, for ifcertain overseas producers of oil - or of any other commodify - decide toincrease their prices way above the market rate, the relative cost of domesticproduction falls and this stimulates investment. Likewise, other overseascompetitors soon decide that they can increase their share of the market bylowering their prices. In practice, the onlyway a cartel can ever be preservedis by legislation, othenrise somebody always gets greedy and breaksit up.

78


Chapter Eleven: From Hell On EarthTo Pie In SIqy

Antinomian Communism:GuiltyByDint OfBirth

We have mentioned atready the antinomian aspects of communism/social-ism. Now let's hear it straight from the horse's mouth. Here is Lenin himselfspeaking: "A Communist must be prepared to make every sacrifice and" ifneeessa(y, even resort to all sorts of schemes and stratagems, employ iil€t-inate methods, conceal the truth, in order to get into the trades unions, staythere, and conduct the revolutionaryworkwithin..." (1)

I-enin's biographer David Shub wrote that Lenin was scornful of tradesunions but sought to control them. (2) Indeed, in this rrcspect his successorshave been spectacularly successftrl in most Westem nations bar the UnitedStates; the trades union movement has become all but synonlmous withsocialism, although most workers wouldri't be too keen on socialism if theyrealised exactlywhat the comrades have in store for them when the revolutioncomes.

Herc is another Lenin quote from the samework, and this one is a lollapa-looza: "!Ye repudiate all such morality that is taken outside of human classconcepts. We saythat this is tleception, a fraud, which clogs the brains of theworkers and peasants in the interest of the landlords and capitalists.We saythat our morality is entirely subordinatetl to the interest of the slass strrrgglsof the proletariat. Our morality is derived from the interests of the classstruggle ofthe proletarial' (3)

In otherwords, anything that furthers the class struggle is good, includingmass murder, even if such mass murder includes the workers who are beingliberatedby the socialists. It is a staple of socialist propaganda that people areguilty by dint of their birth; (4) the fact that Lenin and most of the othel lsa.lingsocialists were of bourgeois extraction never enters the equation; when the

79


revolution comes, you are down for liquidation, or at the very bestre-edttcationin some foul concentration camp. Ihis was what happened before, in the SovietUnion and eve4mhere else these monsters have seized power. Anil this is whatwill happen the next time.

In his book-,4dvance Tb Babaism, the lawyer FreilerickYeale explains thesocialist mentality perfectly. When Nazi Germany was defeated at the end ofthe Second World War, the Allies decided to hold a series of trials to prove '

among s1[s1 things - that t]e Nazis alone were guilty of starting the nar, andttrat they alone should be held accountabte. (5) Ihis rvas not to Stalin'5 liking!he wanted to put all the Nazis up against the nearest wall. (6) The reason forthis had absolutely nothing to do with their alleged responsibility for warcrimes andeverythingto dowith socialistideolory.Vealewrites that "obviously,a man like Hennann Gdring could not be made to fit into a proletarian systemof society. What else, therefore, could be done with him but eliminate hirn? Noquestion of punishing him enters into the matter. In facf in the abstract' aCommunist might even admire him as an individual in the same uay as onemight admit that a lion roaming about Piccadilly Circus was a noble animal,a masterpiece of nature produced by ages of evolution which was only devour'ing people in accordancewith its perfectly natural instincl One might becomelyncal conceming its courage and beauty and yet quite reasonably naintainthat therc was no altemative to removing by violencc a creature ufrich wouldobviously be a disturbing influence to the human life around it In this entirelypassionless spirit lenin and Dzerzhinslry had eliminated the aristocratic andplutocratic classes ofCzarist Russia togetherwith tens ofthousands ofortho'dox bishops and priests after the Revolution of L917. To complain that manyinnocent persons perished in the Red Temor is entirely to miss the poinl Thegreat majorityperished" not because theywere deened guilty ofany particularoffence, but because they could not be assimilated by the new proletarian statethen being createil." (7)

Ihis lengthyextract sums up thepenertedlogic of socialisnandatthe sametime cuts throughall the crap about buildinga caring societyandabetterworldfor all. f irst and foremost, socialism is a philosophy of hahed.

Just as anything that furthers the dass struggle is good, while anything thathinders it is bad, so too is anything that furthers the class strugle true, whileanything that hinders it is false.We have seen this with regard to the manipu-lation andcontrol ofthe mass medial numerous otherexamples couldbegiven.

80


One author has nritten tha* "Faced with a clash between their ideas and theevidence, scientists will change their ideas. The special pleaders, like socialscientists, prefer to change the evidence, and show why normal judgmentscannot be made in their particular case. Very often it is the supreme importanceof the cause which is called upon to justify the special standards." (8) This mayor may not be true of all social scientists, but it is certainly true of "socialistscientistsn, and indeed of socialists generally.

The Withering Away Of The StateUnder Socialism

We nentioned briefly earlier ttrat the promise of socialism is the regenerationof man and the withering away of the state. We stated also that this concept isa religious one mther than a political one, (see page 24). We might have addedthat both Man and Engels, the chief theorists of communism/socialism beforeI*nin and Thotslry, were confirmed Lamarckists, and that their politicalphilosophywas based in part on the fallacious beliefthat acquired charac-teristics can be inherited. This alone should be enough to raise serious ques-tions about its validity. (9) Further, when one examines the quackery thatpasses for Mamist s cience, one soon realises that it contaips many other flawsand absurdities. Wlmot Robertson has written that "Engels was particularlynoted for a perverted brand of llegelian gibberish that would be utterlyludicrous if it were not now considered Holy Writ by a large segment ofmankind." (10)

Exacfly how and why an all-powerful state is going to wither away has neverbeen properly explained, nor has the supposed regeneration of man. Lenin wasfull of such blather. Here are three of his quotes on the stats 'So long as thestate exists therc is no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no state."(11) And 'fJnder socialism all wdll govern in turn and will soon beconeaccustomed to no one governing." (12) And "As the state is only a transitionalinstitution which we are obliged to use in the revolutionary struggle in orderto crush our opponents forcibly, it is a pure absurdity to speak of a Fbee

81


Feople's State. During the period when the proletariat still needs the state' itdoes not require it in the interests of freedom, but in the interests of crushingantagonists." (13)

The lirst sentence of the first quote is an unfortunate reality, but that doesn'talter the fact that some states are more free than others and that it is certainlypossible, in theoryat least fora state to interfere minimallyif at all in the livesof its citizens. (14) It stands to reason that the state which is less able tointerfere in the lives of its law-abiding citizens is the state rvlich has the leastlegal power to ilo so. The further claim that'\ilhen there is freedom therewillbe no state" is sonethingwhich none of us need concern ourselves with becauseeven if this statement is true it will not come about in our lifetimes, if at all.Lenin's claim that "Under socialism a/i will govem in tum andwill soon bocomeaccustomed to no one governing" has been refuted time and time again inpractice; under socialism all are ruled, and nany are t5rannised. Socialisminvolves the centralisation and concentration of powe4 not the difrrsion ofpolYer.

As to the third quote, about the state being a transitional institution; thereality is that the state - in one form or another - has been with us since theadvent ofcivilisationandwill bewith us for a long timeyelAs to the proletariatneeding the state to crush antagonists, this is the very antiJhesis of frcedom'forin a free societyantagonistswill betolerated. (15) Brieflythen,thewitheringaway of the state after the establishment of socialism is not only a piece ofwishful thinking but nonsense of the first ord.er.

The ComradesWake Up

Ihe death of the leader of the Labour Pu"ty, Joho Smith, in 1994 at therelativelyyoung age of55, brought the election ofthe youthful Tony Blair ashead ofthe Opposition. Blair has set about the deconstruction ofthat party'ssocialist machinery and has attempted, for the most part successfully, toinftoduce serious reforms toits economicpolicy.This is notsonethingentirelynew, and indeed Blair has for the most part simply continued the process thatJohn Snittr introduced after Labour had suffered its fourth consecutive

82


General Election defeat. The last defeat was all the more difftcult to swallownot because it uas the fourth in a row but because Labour had expectedconfidently to win. The biggest change in Labour Party policy has been thescrapping of Clause Four, an antiquated piece ofnonsense dating from ante-diluvian times which committed the party to the state control of major indus-hies. (16)

Labour is far from the only "socialist" partywhich has woken up to the realityof the unworkability of socialism; the Revolutionary Communist Party pub-lishes a maga zine called, Living M amism which is less Manist than Libertarian;on occasion the RCP have even offered to debate with "fascists". (17) But themost telling indication that the boobs have iinally woken up came' for thecurrent writer, when he visited the oflice s of the Moming Star newspaper in 1992as part of his ongoing researches into far left ideologr. Though tbe Moming,Sfar (which was founded in 1930 as tble Daily Worker) was once a signifrcantCommunist Party newspapery its circulation has dwintlletl significantly overthe yrcars. (18)

Ihe person who assisted me with my researches at the lmper was DonCuckson, a time serving communistwho was the Archivist/Librarian.If I recallhe was long retired, had white hair and worked for the paper part time. At thetime of myvisit, radical changes were going on behind the former Iron Curtain;I asked Don Cuckson what he thought about all this. In reply he took out apiece of paper which he said concern ed the Nomenklatura in Poland. It was alengthy list of the faithful. Every important office of every organisation hadbeen controlled by a party official from, not just national and local governmentbutright iloumto thelocal chess club. Don Cuckson lookeda sadoldmanwhenhe told me that this wasn't what he meant by socialism. By socialism he meantfreedom, and this wasn't it. I found this both very moving and very saQ if DonCuckson, who nnas obviouslya decent human being ' unlike some of the scumone finds in the SWP - if he, and people like him' had laboured under theillusion for so long that they had been fighting for freedom, people who haddevoted their entire working lives to the "struggle", then something must betenibly wrorg with, not only the socialist system, but with people's criticalfaculties also.

83


The Growth OfThe State:Empire-Building And TheDestruction Of Freedom

"socialism is not a movement of the people. It is a movement of the intellec'tuals, originated, led and controlleil by the intellectuals' canied by them outof their stuffy ivory towers into those bloody fields of practice where they unitewith their allies and executors: the tlugs." - Ayn Rand (19)

Ihe appeal of socialism/communism has always been to tle intellectuals;all the evidence of socialist duplicity, cruelty and naked finanny has notdiminished its appeal to the intellectuals in the slightest. Indeed this appealhas increased markedly with the passage of time. What is the explanation forthis? There is probabty no single erplanation; undoubtedly iilealism has a lotto do with it, intellectuals tend to be cultured' thoughtful and philosophical'mone so than the rest of us. At least, that is what theywould have us believe.Ihere are though less honourable and inherently selfish rcasons for their (and

ottrers' adhertnce), to collectivist ideologies.Intellectuals tend to be employerl bythe government, by the universities, and

similar institutions. Generally they do not concern themselves with the manu-facture of goods or getting their hands dirty. They are academics, lawyers, butmost of all, they are bureaucrats. Every olganisation needs sone form ofbureaucracy, however limited; cash flows have to be managed, timetables haveto be scheduled, and most ofall, policyhas to be formulated.Manyintellectualsbelieve that because oftheir (supposedly) superior intelligence and their (oftennarrow) superior education and learning, they are better equipped than therestof us tomakedecisionsrincludingfortherest ofus.This is in starkcontrastto their professed egalitarianism. Ihe same people who denounce the likes ofArthur Jensen and Hans Eysenck for their supposedly racist view that blacksare inherrcntly less intelligent than whites have no qualms whatsoever aboutregulating the business and social lives ofthe rest ofus because theybelievesincercly that they know better how we should live our lives than we doourselves.

84


One must be careful here to draw a distinction between bureaucrats andtechnicians. As Man's understanding of the Universe grows by leaps andbounds, so too does the need to specialise. Three hundred and moreyears agomen such as Newton and konardo could make pioneering discoveries in avariety of fields. Newton fonnulated the laws of motion, discovered gravity, andco-invented the Calculus. Leonardo was not only a great scientist but a greatartist. lioday, most scientists tend to specialise in rather narrow fields. (20)Even in the social sciences there is a tendency to specialise because theliterature is so vast. Ihe increasing specialisation of knowledge means that,increasingly, fewer and fewer people are qualifred to make important technicaldecisions. Ihere is though a very sharp distinction between such technicaldecisions and the despotism of those who would rule over us without ourinfomed consenL

The great Chinese statesman and philosopher Dr Sun Yat-sen viewedgovernment as a purely technical device with our rulers acting merely astechnicians. Ihe govemment, he said, had political power and administrativepower; his viewwas that the administrative power should remain in the handsof the govenment while the political power was divested in tle people, [seeFigure l belowl. (21)

POI.ITICAL POWER OF TIIE PEOPLE

ISuffrage

IRecall

rlInitiative Referendum

OF THE GOVERNMEIqTADMINISTRATIVE POWER

t lt l

Legis1ature JudiciarY Executive Civil CensorshiPServiceExaminations

85


Only a fool would deny the fact that, although we have the right of suffrage -

every live years or so - the people do not, by and large, have the power ofinitiative, Q2) nor of recall, and only very rarely have we seen referendaan;'rrhere in the Western world. The other tendency is for the various anns ofgovernment to be either concentrated into the Executive or to be subverted byall manner of special interest groups. The theme of Frederick HayelCs 19214bookThe RoadTb Serfdom is that all governments, the then Nazi goYemmentof Germany, that of the (much more recently defunct) Soviet Union, and theso-called democracies of the West, were, and are, travelling the same road.

Indeed, as long ago as 1936, a respected American politician, Alfred E. Smithof New Yorl made precisely the same claim: "Just get the platform of theDemocratic party andget the platform ofthe Socialist partyandlaythem doumonyour dining-room table, side by side, and get a heavyleadpencil andscratchout the word 'Democratict and scratch out the word 'Socialist,' and let the twoplatforms lay there, and then study the record. of the present administrationup to date.' (23)

He was referring here to the New Deal administration of Flanklin DelanoRoosevelt, in particular to its collectivisation ofresources and their redistribu-tion "not by any process of law, but by the whims of a bureaucratic autocracy.nQ4)

Then Smith made this stark challenge: "After you have done that make yourmind up to pick up the platfom that more nearly squares with the record, andyou will have your hand on the Socialist platform...it is not the first time inrecorded history that a group ofmen have stolen the livery ofthe church to dothe work of the devil." (25)

Another extremelywell informed indivitlual writing on this same subject hasobservedthat kars bringcontrols and...somepeople in high places areso fondof contrsls that a war may appear a desirable means 16r s5ta[lishing them.'(20

kst the reader think this is idle rhetnric, let me quote someone whoendorsed this idea. In March 1933, the LondonDaily kpress reported that:

"Mr. Gilbert Fhankau, the novelist, [made] a piquant speech [the previousniChtl... 'A war would be a great idea,' he said. tAnother war would give ourthree million unemployed ample employnent.

86


I would suggest conscription for this country. It would be immenselypopular."'(27)

The speaker in this instance was not concerned with establishing controls somuch as creating prosperity. No doubt he meant well' but the idea that warscan create prosperity - except for arms manufacturers, et al - is less novel thaninsane. Onewonders if, in the immediate aftermath of the SecondWorldWar'people who remember.ed this speech would have been quite as williug to endorseits sentiments as they had been, evidently, in 1933. It goes without saying thatif people are willing to endorse wars to end unemplolment for others' they willbe just as willing, if not a great deal more willing, to endorse wars, and othermeans of enforcing social controls, in order to generate employment forthemselves.

It is not thqugh only the intellectuals uiho find statism comforting. Com'merce, business, marketing, have always been precarious ways to eam a living.lhue, there ane some products which will always be necessary. A baker is asecure job, so one would imagine. Peoplewill always need bread. Or is that thecase? In December 1988, the Junior Health Mlnister Mrs Edwina CuIrie,concerned at an outbreak of salmonella, wamed the British public not to buyeggs. Egg sales plummeted, literally overnight. (28) Who's to say that some-thing similar couldn't happen to bread, and bankrupt half the bakers in thecount4r, or even in the entire world?

Today, even once traditionatly secure jobs are no Ionger what they used tobb. \ilho's to say that computer-assistetl learning will not eventually makemany teachers redundant, or security cameras and other devices lead to adrastic reduction in the number of police officers?

The commercial sector is dependent on making a profrt, and it can do thatonly as long as it satisfies its customers. The state though is different; it canalways pay its emptoyees because it can print money, borrow money (includingunder duress), and extract money from its subjects compulsorily. (29) More'over, the nature of govemnent means that inefficiency tends to be rewarded.A private corporation that can use one man instead of two to do a particularjob will do so and increase its efficiency and save costs. A govemment depart-ment that can employ two men instead of one will increase its funding.

Furthermore, the people at the top of the organisation, whatever it is, havea tendency to build layer upon layer of bureaucracy around themselves; this

87


makes them look more important and gives them more power, it also makestheir own jobs more secure, for when the axe is wielded, it is inevitably thejunior and'less important" posts that are lost. It is not necessaryto postulateany sort of conspiracy theory to explain such empire-building, it is sinply howhuman natureworks.

It is this phenomenon morr than any other that e4plains the grorvth ofbureaucracy throughout the capitalist world" and to a great extent the strang-ling of industry by red tape. People who work in certain agencies are foreverdrrcaming up new ways to justify their own existence, and to push their ownagendas. In order to do this they will stoop to the basest of tricks, includingoutright lying and often naked tyranny. An excellent example of this is theanti-smoking industry.

In Chapter Six we mentioned the Harry Elphick casel other dirty tricks ofthe anti-smoking lobby include the manufactured controversy over passivesmoking, the use ofchildren to entrap tobacconists, and the abuse, doctoring,and even outright faking of mortality statistics. In the United Statesn theEnvironmental Protection Agency has used its Draconian powers to virtuallystrangle industry, and has manufactured one environmental scare after an-other. (30)

B8


Chapter Tlvelve: Race, SocialistMendacityAnd TheAppeal Of Fascism

Anti-SemitismAnd The Rise OfThePopularFront

Ihe current uriter has demonstrated clearly here, as have many before himtthat the main appeal of socialism has always been to intellectuals, and thatgenuine workers in the movement have been few and far between. That beingsaid, there have aluays been more ways than one to skin a cat, and the morededicated members of the Socialist International have long resorted both tothe infiItration of bona fide movements for social reform and to the creationofpopular fronts in order to further tleir long term goal, the subjugation ofall nankind. (1)

A popular front is exacfly that [ie an organisation which supports a popularcause butwhich is in reality (or also) a front for other activitiesl. It is usuallya campaigning organisation created by communists and/or socialists with theostensible purpose ofbringing about desirable social change. Ihis can be anynumber of things, but the two most important fields in which the far left hascampaigned since the end of tle Second World War are (against) nuclearproliferation - specilically through CND - and assorted race issues.

The earlyl920s sawtherise of Italian Fascismunderthe leadership ofBenitoMussolini. At the time, Fascism was an entirely non'racial philosophy. (Wetouched on this brielly in Chapter Three). Ilowever, in Gemany' NationalSocialism which (all but purists like Colin Jordan will concede) is a form offascism, took on a distinctly anti-Semitic flavour. Again' we must stress thatanti-Semitism is not a necessary ingredient of fascist or even of NationalSocialist ideology. It is not widely known that the Dutch Nazi Farty' founded in1931 under the leadership of Anton Adriaan Mussert, was totally non-anti'Semitic. (2)

89


It is also a matter of painful historical record that the origins of anti-Semi-tism lie squanely with organised Christianity rather than with any politicalnovemenL At &e time Hitler was beginning his political career the mainpurveyors of anti-Semitism were not the nascent fascists but Consenatives ofa very different bent. In 1920, the notorious Protocols Of Zion reared its uglyhead in the West. Although theProtocols, a Tsarist fabrication, tirst appearedshortly after the tum of the century, it was all but unknown until after theBolshevik Revolution. It was distributed to the White Armies who were tigltingagainst the Bolsheviks, but it wasn't until the publications of the Germantranslation Dle Geheimnisse der Weisen von Zion, and shortly afterrvards tlefirst English translation (The Jewish Peil),that it really caught on.

On May 8, l920,the London Times (of all papers) published a review of theProtocols utrder the headingz "THE IEWSH PEKIL.. A DISTURBINGPAMPHLET CALL FOR INQUIRY. In July the same year, another higb Torynewspaper, the MomingPosf, published a famous series of articles under thegeneric tifle The Cause Of World Unrest.

Anyoneu&o has taken the troubleto examine such nonsense dispassionatelywill conclude that the Protocols is less an anti-Semitic document than amystical one. Be thatas itnay,it becamea majortenet ofanti-Semitic ideolory,(3) and uras given an enormous boost when Henry Ford, founder of the FordMotor Company and one of the richest men in the world, developed anobsession with the Intemational lews and. the Jewish world conspiracy whichwas to lasttle rest of his life. Ford, an ascetic Conservative, pumped millionsof dollars into a campaip to educate the American people about the Jervishmenace, and, although he was certainly no Nazi, he is known to have been anearly backer of Adolf Hifler; the admiration was mutual. (4)

The Jewish menace wasn't the only contemporary scare, allied to it vas theBolshevik menace, which filled many people in the West, including in Westemgovernments, with grave apprehension. It was as a response to this thatfascism was founded in Britain, as well as in Germany.

The first British fascist party was known as the British Fascisti. It uasformed byMiss Rotha Beryl Lintom Lintorn-Orman (1895-1935), in May 1923.She is said to have bomowed the name and very little else from ltaly. (5) TheBritish Fascisti were not fascists at all in any meaningful sense of the word,but radical Conservatives. Iheir platform included making both strikes andlbck-outs illegal, and allegiance to God and counfi. In practice they supported

90


the Consenative Party. (6) The membership, including the leadership cadre,contained a surprisingnumber of women, and although Miss Lintorn-Ormanwas prone to making absurdly inflated claims about her party's membership,(7) it is doubtful if the British Fascisti was eyer taken seriously by anyoneoutside of its own small circle. The most daring thing it ever did was send theKinga telegram on his birthday. (8)

That being said, a number of people who would later become prominent inthe fascisJ movement also started their careers in the British Fascists. (9) Oneof thesenas William Joycenwho later became knorrn as Lord Haw Haw; anotherwas Amold Leese, who went on to found the Imperial Fascist League and tobecome the most fanatical anti-Semite this country has ever produced. (10) Inspite of all this, the man who is generally credited as the kingpin of BritishFascism is Sir Oswald Mosley. The British Union of Fascists was founded onlyn t%2; this was about the time that the Nazis were really coming to pro-minsass, and although Mosley's early supporters included a number of Jews,among them the former world middleweight boxing champion Kiil Lewis, itwas not long before the dregs of East End Jewry and their red friends beganto attackthe BIJF as anti-Semitic.

On forming the BU[, Mosley had stated categorically that anti-Semitismwas no part of his moyement's policy; (11) there can be no doubt whatsoeverthat he uas sincere, and the Jewish press condemned those Jews who attackedBIJF members. (12) On one occasion, Mosley was praised in the IewishChronicle as a formidable opponent of anti-Semitism. (13) All this was not tolast tlough, and when Mosley attacked what he considered to be - rightly orwrongly - sinister Jewish influences thatwere attempting to embroil Britain inanother war with Germany, the Jewish press turned on him with a vengeance.Give a dog a bail name and it will bite you. So with the BUF; it excluded Jewsfrom membership and began a series of crude Jew-baiting articles in itsnewspaper 77r e Blacl<shirt, and quickly lost the support of, among others, LordRothermere, the publisher of the Daily Mail who had previously erpressedadmiration for Mosley.

In the public mind also, any form of fascism became associated inevitablywith anti-Semitism, and later with racism and aII forms of racial bigotry andhaheil. The greatest beneficiary of this was the Socialist Intemationaln whichhad created the myth of anti-Semitic fascism in the first place, and which wasable to present itselfas a champion ofthe downtrodden and oppressed, in

91


particular of the non-white peoples of the world, and, of course, of the Jews.An early front organisation was the London-based Jewish People's CouncilAgainst Fascism And Anti-Semitism; this was in bed with the NCCL (nowknown as Liberty). ln!937, the NCCL anil the Jewish People's Council soughta meeting with the Home Office in connection with anti-Semitic activities inthe East End of London. The Mandarins were not amused, and the official fileon the NCCL's rcquest spits contempt: "...the National Council of [sic] CivilUberties...is a bodywith close subterranean connections...with the ConmunistParty...its modus operandi is to vilify the police on all possible occasions, thefavourite charges being that the police consistently abuse their powers...[to]show partiality towards the Fascists..." (and that notwithstanding its distin-guished supporters). (14)

Interestingly, the memorandum continues: "The propagation of Fascism asa political philosophy is as lawful as the propagation ofany other creed, andfor the govemment to receive a deputation from organisations, one of whosemain objects is to combat Fascism qua Fascism, would be open to misinte4lre-tation...n (15) This is an inportant point which is often forgotten nowadays inthe hysteria over racism, (shortly to be discussed). Fascism is a legal philos-ophy, and its adherents havejust as much rigbt to preach it as do the adherentsof any other legal political philosophy. The Jewish People's Council was notliked by the Board of Deputies of British Jews,was said to have little supportfrom the community, and to be an unrepresentative body. (1O

The JPC was far from the only such front organisation operating in Britain'oreven in London,atthattime.The otlicial Special Branch reporton extremistmeetings covered by the Metropolitan Police in November 1938, reported that:

'Anti-Fascist novements have been more active than usual following thelatest Nazi drive against Jewry.

The COMMUMST PARII has made some attempt to organise demonstua-tions among the Jewish population in London but achieved little success inthis direction.

A number of pseudo Jewish anti-Fascist organisations have sprung upagain, operating chiefly in the Dalston and Stoke Newington aueas.

They style themselves variously as tle DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, DEMO-CRATIC UNION, DEMOCRATIC LEGION, LEGION OF DEMOCRATS anilJEWISH DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT and are conducted by men who have

92


been mentioned previously in these reports in connection with this kind oforganisation. As has been pointed out before they cannot be regarded asgenuine anti-Fascist or Jewish organisations but are merely operating to

obtain contributions from the public and to exploit the present disturbedpolitical situation in Europe. The meetings receive little support." (17)

Six Mitlion Reasons To HateTheWhite Race

The Second World War ended with perhaps fifty million dead, and atrocities

committed on both sides, for such is the nature of war. Allied atrocitiesincluded such acts of insanity as Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the fire-bombing ofTolryo and the destruction of Dresden. However, at the end of the war, the

victors hit on the novel idea of putting the vanquished on trial, mosfly Germansbut also many Japanese, and collaborators such as the Iilorld War One hero

and leader of vichy Flance, Marshal P6tain. The focus of the spurious war

crimes trials was, and remains, the Nazi death camps, including the allegetlextemination camps of Auschwitz and others in the East.

The British, who liberated Belsen, found some thirteen thousand col?seslying arounil the camp, which was disease-ridden, particularly with typhus'

and, on account of severe logistical and other problems, a scene of mass

starvation and utter homor. Simitar scenes were found at other liberateil

camps, including Dachau, although bynomeans all the liberatedinmateswereinfected with typhus, or starving. Some of those liberated at Dachau were fit

enough to abuse their forner captors. (18)altuay of the true nature of the Nazi camps is beyond the scope of the

currentwork,itwill sufrice to sayhere thatall the camps, andtheNazi ideologrwhich is saiil to have created them, have, by clever propaganda and manipu-

lation of the media, become associated permanently in the public mind with

racial hahed and genocide. Although it has never been claimed - except by the

sensationalist prtss and the ignorant ' that Belsen was any sort of extermina'

tion canp, (19) the public perception of the Holocaust has always been, in the

93


minds of the British public at least, the temible scenes found at Belsen, andthese have been used not only as pro of that the Nazis gassed Jews, (20) but asproof that any form ofwhite racial consciousness, white racial awareness orantipathy tonards any form of race-mixing, is inherently evil and must leadinevitably to genocide. (21)

Both individual Jews and Jewish (specifically Zionist) organisations havequite ruthlessly exploited the Ilolocaust - whatever it was - for financial, andmore often, political, pur?oses. They may and do scream to high heaven thatany such suggestion amounts to rabid anti-Semitism, but it is a point that ishardly worth debating. The most cynical exploiters of the Holocaust thoughhave without doubt been the Socialist International and their fellow travellersin the race industry.

Racial Realities In Recent History -Colonialism And Imperialism

Over the past few hundred years the white race spread out over the entireglobe subjugating all before it and inposing its customs and institutions onthe non-white peoples of the world. Hardly any of the non-white races was leftuntouched by the long arm of colonialism, and indeed, much of this subjuga-tion was accomplished by one small island nation, Britain. Incredible as it mayseem to thosewhite British kids growing up today, at one time the greater partof the civilised world was mapped in the red of the British Empire on whichthe sun never set.

Because of the pervasive inlluence of the aforementioned socialists and theirfellow travellers, the negative aspects of colonialism and Imperialism havebeen drummed into the heads of, especially the young' to the exclusion of allelse. It is certainly true that many formerly subject races could. make out animpressive case against theWhite Man. The peoples of Thsmaniawerewipedout, the native peoples of North America were likewise treated at times bar-barically, andthe colonialisn and Imperialism of the British and otherEuro-

94


pean powers certainly did exploit the peoples of Africa and India. But overall,tle Imperialists bestowed far more benefits on their subjects than misery.

The distinguished liberal historian Professor Quigley has written that:"British rule in the periotl 1858-1947 tied Intlia together by railroads, roads,and telegraph lines.It brought the countryinto contactwith theWesternworld,and especiallywith worlil markets, by establishing a uniform system of money'steamboat connections with Europe by the Suez Canal, cable connectionstlroughout the world, and the use of English as the language of governmentand administration, Best of all, Britain established the rule of laq equali8before the law, and a tradition ofjudicial fairness to replace the older practice

of inequality and arbitrary violence." (22)This was far from the only contribution of the wicked Imperialists to the

Indian sub-continent. The Research Bulletins of the Agricultural ResearchInstitute at Pusa for 1911-12 report on flax experiments, wheat cultivation'rrcsearch into horse diseases, rice diseases, bee-keeping, and much more. (23)

Other, equally impressive contributions to the welfare of Indians and othercolonial peoples were made in many other fields.

Nowhere was the impact of colonialism greater than in Africa. Contrary tothe fantasies of the Boas school of cultural anthropologf' there was never anycivilisation in Black Africa in any meaningful sense of the word. The firstpnerequisite for civilisation is a written language, and it is a fact that the Negrohas oever developed anyuritten langUage. Thus, even slavery has not beenentirely without benefit to the Negfo, albeit to later generations rather thanthose who suffered under it and died in their millions while being transferredto the NewWorld in the most brutal and inhuman of conditions.

Because ofthe hysteria oYer racisrn which has been generated by the scenesfound at Belsen and elsewhere, and ofthe alleged Nazi genocide ofthe Jews,any suggestion that different races have different (ie inferior) potential to

contribute towards the advance of civilisation has become taboo throughoutacademia as well as throughout the media. The word racivn (24) has been usedas a catch-all device to blame the White Man for all the sins of the world andto excuse all black shortcomings. Whites have been portrayed as inherently

evil; blacks a s oppressed.Thewordracism is used to desipate not only a belief

in innate racial differences (its original meaning) but hostility to racial inte-gration - including forced integration - hostility to miscegenation and the

95


resultant racial death, telling politically incorrectjokes' poking fun offoreignaccents, preference for the company of one's own kind, you name it.

There are those, it is true, who believe that the Black Man has no innatecapacity for civilisation at all, that he should be segregated, or even denied thecommon cultural inheritance (25) which is the rigbt of us all. Ihese peoplethough are, and always have been, an insignificant minority, and in any casesuch racial intolerance, bigotry or outright hatred is by no means unique towhites. (26)

Since the end of the Second World War, the former colonies of the Europeanporryers have been slowly, and sometimes brutally, decolonised. All manner ofneasons have been advanced for this, including conspiracy theories, many ofthem bordering on the absurd. Probably the wisest words ever written on thissubjectwere thosepennedbyElmer Pendell in his study,SerZersus Civilization.Undoubtedly the world communist movement played a major role in thedestruction of colonialism, if only by the spread of communist ideologr ratherthan actual conquest.

The classic example was Rhodesia. This was a country that had beensuccessfully self-governing for over 40 years; its white population numberedsome 220,(X)0 to about 4 mitlion Negroes. A declaration of rights was enhen'ched in its constitutioq the franchise was not restricted to the whites but wasextended to all citizens who owned property or earned a certain minimumincome. In addition to this a chief or headman could vote. The reason for thiswas clearly, as Pendell states, that a country cannot be governed by iporanceor stupidity, and that where the majority of a country's citizens are illiterate,as they were in Rhodesia, some sort of overlordship is not only inevitable butnecessary. (27)

In 1980, when Rhodesia was handed oYer to the murdering Manist thugRobert Mugabe, we witnessed the spectacle of illiterate people voting. Askndell points out:

"Illiterates are likelyto be tools of persons alreadyin power'so ineffectthereis less of government by the people as the suffrage is broadened.' (28) Andwhen that happens "the Communists offer their oum government machinery -

by internal agents. Ihey have something that is better than chaos, and theysucceed in convincing tleir victims of that.

96

L6

'ru6pl.roXl puotas eqf aJoJag'quu{ eqf Jo ro sard,(d a .Ilnupqp aqlJo (09)'xnuwpbsg pe{teu-iloqs aql Jo 'asaugq3 Jluqlo Jo 'aldoad etlqra Jo etue5geeq1 .{uap ,tpreq uuJ euo lpar sg puu slsFe eJsU 'JapJo lsJg aqf Jo esnesuouq s$[l'auo pcfololq s ueql raqler ldaruor lultos e q l luql lspra ,tlear

luseop eter IBIII sg a111sa8E;q puu lsrg aq;,'sytrl W1n op o1 Eulqlauos e Bq,{gensn s,nal pawuwnwuolgu xls pue uaquoqc m3 'u.reEg'sag ffiI4no pue

IlsurIJBIq 1euopoua 'sqrpq ,tgp yo .rauuuu 1e ,(q ,{larJos rIJe$alI uo pasodu;ueeq suq ldecuor sn8oq qryauo lspr.rstr tr e q usllDrlo ldaeuoc,iral aq1 'rp'arJpnfard ',(.r1oftq ppu.rgo atuelsge eql,tuap o1 qqlooJ eq ppo r lI q8noqfry

rusIJBu 6rusrcug 6msleug

:f,ro1sl11fuareg q sepIIBeU IuIrsU

'puplrrBrtr Jo uInJ lBnlueae aql of pBaI II]$ oq,[ suoJolu IIBqIJaqpJ splolluu sg lg puu ',{.rnlueC qpltue {I eqlJo sJelseslp 1uluautror! ua prIBsa;pa8e.q usunq eqlJo IIe lsortrle roJ alqpuodsar uaaq a^sq oqra suoJou ueqfJeqlar splolluu 'asel fue q 'q lI ',tuuu.r,$ pue uogede1s luslnsal aql pue'usprgrellooyo uo;1dopu eql fq raEg auols aIO of {tsq sdeq.rad fassalfa.r pueLra,nod yo uolsnllIp puu ,(uouora pusuap u :ua1s,ts 1sJp11der e ,(q pacuequaaq ru$,i{Iqu 1uq1 'uopeslllalr B ulqulsltr pue p[nq o1 aoe.r.,(ue;o ,{1gqu aq3Ja alcqlrpuy'qq3 pa,ro.rd a^Bq saFtrouoca ;q1e11deJ Jleql paulqar e^Eq tuqlselJlunoJ usrFJV AreJ asoql !uo1s.ra,r,qns ls1unurtrol Jo llnseJ aql ,t1afue1 san 1g1eq1 s; ,(4pa.r aql !,{1pro;.ra3ul aleuu! s.uetrAl {c"Ig aql Jo llnser elg q slsapoq1go uopqgodsap luelFser aql feql antuu fuu6 IBuolf"N qspprg eqf Jo so[Ieql'asJnotJo ailqDEulz ,rlou 6qsapoqg u1 pauadduq 1uq,n,t1aspa.rd s1 s;ry

(69) ,,-'aldoad aql go 11p$ aql srra4p t1.reqler laldoad eql Jo IIpraqt 1ragar lou saop.{.r1unot lslunwtuo3 B uI luau[ra,rot aryuollstpnurrtrot

Jo suBeru raqlo pue ssa.rd aq1 Jo loJluot pprls Sqqqupu {q puu ',tged

prllqod auo Inq ge Eulssa.rddns fq auop sl IEILI'luauora,roE eql puu aldoedaql uae qeq d;qsuopela.l snogour.req,{1.rpy e daa>1 o1 aSuueu,taql osly

ensnvrcos HrGNn rvocsluJ


most biologists, anthropologists and others were quite candid about racialdilferences, often to the point of embarrassment. (31)

Nowadays, the largety Malxist dominated race industra does not shrinkfrom outright lying and the lies are so grotesque that it is a wonder that anyonewould believe them.

Aparticularlygrotesque enample is a series of pamphlets spewcd out bytheso-called Institute of Race Relations in the earlyeighties. The first in the series'Roots of racism, claims that "there is in fact no such thing as dilferent races'not scientifrcally speaking. Despite all the years ofinvestigating and charting- this blood group and that this bone structure and that, this disease and that- scientists have found no biological characteristics that belong exclusively toany one group of the world's people. Separate 'races' do not exist. All we areleft with are the scientitically meaningless variations of skin colour." (32)

Ihe most insidious thing about this poison is that it was produced underthe guise of educational material in order to indoctrinate the young.

On the very same page, the barely hidden agenda of this pamphlet and of itspublisher comes right out into the open: !'It is the white nations which have'and appear determined to keep at any cost, wealth, and therefore power, grosslyoutof proportiontothe size oftheirpopulations,anditis the non-whitenationswhich struggle relentlessly forjustice and equality.' (33)

This is very clearly Marxist rhetoric. All whites aFe seen as oppressorsrallnon-whites as oppressed. The fact that the white nations have proportionatelymore wealth and power could just have something to do with the fact that theycreated this wealth and power by their own industriousness. Ag;ain, the capi-talist system has more than a little to do with this, for as Ayn Rand tells us:"Under the ineptgovemment of the czars andwith the mostprimitive methodsof agriculture, Russia was a major grain exporter...That Russia should nowbeon a list of hungry, wheat-begging importers is the most damning indictmentof a collectivist economy that reality can offer us." (34)

Indeed, for all the talk about raclva and racial disadvantage, the AmericanNegro has always enjoyed a far higher standard of living than the whiteRussian. In his 1966 book Bondage of the Free, the American author KentSteffgen pointed out that American Negroes then owned 45 million auto'mobiles - one to almost every four persons - while in the Soviet Union, therewas only one carfor every350 people, andmost of thesewere either state'orryned

98

66

pafFII eql ol ssorJB doq,(ptrerba{ pus luauitoldEaun ou ,tIIBqr.r^ resns trslauoJu! ou ,tsd tpelq ere uoqaJo sprlql onl sepnrurag 3o aldoad aqg 'plJora aqlu;Eupr;1go prupusls lsaq8g qgg aql seq'puusnoqlflx.rs eJartr u sl uopupdodesoqa apnurag yo asype.rud puqq aqf, 'uopeu agq,r,{uu qlln ,t1qe.rno,le3,{aua.4xa sa.reduoo rtrrFpr uolfeu rpu1q,(pueu.ruopa.rd auo ueaa s! eraql

'spJo,ra JoJ pmsqe ool q ',f:o1s go pua salfqa-uoussatddo sallrlA leqf BapI aql 'qgsg uo ,{.rlunor,trare ,t1png.r,r q punoJ eqrret suolfBlol stq8g uutunq pus sesnqu s1q31.r g4c Sqlpdde pue uorcsatddo'acpsnfu; 'anouraq;.rng:rurll plroll puoras eql uI poJesns uedug uollsfse apaqf sJeplsuot auo uaqlr eIqEDIJBuar eJoru aqf ils sl sFtrI '6u.r,r,91 go sprepuslsq8gq,fta,l.{o[ue ruaqf Jo IJp Jo lsoru pue,(lprpuouoJe lnJssaJcns ,{gepeepadsueeq suq 6uedeg,(q pal'suopeu lseg rud Jo f,olq lsJpgdee ary '6uo.rn u-re1daseJ ,tuu ug s1 ,(lgenba pue acpsnf .ro;,(lssapualar apEn.gs suolleu ellqa-Eouaql l"ql uoprasse aq1 'arsr cot {o s7oog lalqdued snouosgod aq1 o1 6u.ru.mlaa

'uopnlos

eql fou sl ,3uslmJ-lpteu prru 'sseprapun aql JoJ ualqo.rd eqf lou sl utspoy'sserJns pl.rneua.rda.rlua puauouaqd J.reql roJ sImoJJ",{pu.rud osIB qJlq,rrts,ten.raqlo u.I qs!truelJ,ira,r. are,{aq1 puu 'anu.r,(p,u-;ep.r s! aJroqp 'salguey

pepuarye a,ruq p.raua8 q suegsy 6aprs aqlJo pua Jarlp aql IV'einJoarD s uuqlJeqlou peFrstuun us ualJo a.rou 'aleuay auol e,{q papaaq eru 'selu1s pelgnaq1 q ,(leJeadsa 6sploqasnoq pBIq Jo a8eluae.rad q8q .fn r y ',(Jpeq ,Cra,r ,t1guu;Jselrnu eql q1;a pador aaeq sl1relq lsql psJ aldu;s aql q srpulq lsSuouu,tga,rod a llBIaJ Jo eler q4q aql JoJ uoseer euo 'su"r.rreuy 1nq seo.6ap,t1uo 1ou a.re plJo r eql rrJ sJexoq ;qfta,n&reaq do1 aq1 p {11un1.r! e11qa,'u.r4;.rgu! se.r4snpq lrsJnslsa.r pue Sugapr aql Jo a8eluauad aleuoprodordqpu dn aluu $arsap uellsll Jo suos.rad :salduuxa eleredsJp onl1snfaqq o1

'setEr luaraglpuae qaq suogunpn1; snorrrJoua aqt pue spua4 lalJos qf,ns .ro3 alqpuodsa.ra.ru qrfq,$ aJBr saplseq sJolruJ snoJarunu eJe aJerf,L'sanaqds IB-rJos pue JJuo-uoea,{usu u! sallq r uuql ra$eq,{lapuop.rodord op 'quap.re ep1 8uJpn1eu1'sa11prou-nu eruos pu" ',$.ra.rod q 8u1,r11 oqu sallqrr r{uertr ere araq,1 'rualqo.rd

{relq B ,(le,qsnpxa ,{p.ruq sI sFIl ',(ga,rod q 3u!4I pue arege r uo s{t"Iqa.rou,{1a1uuop.rodo.rd,(1a1Fgap lsou anu araql q8noq;p 1nq'ssulcrapun {rslq6upno$ pue a6.re1 u sI aJaql salqs pafg1 aql q ferll anq,{p.regar q ;1

gg)'a,r;ssardul,{lunba areft srllsguls J$trouote Jeqfo 's1epgo Euuruer-q8fq,{q perrato ro

al/usllvrcos u30Nn Noc=l:lHl


states on shopping trips. crime is all but unknown on the island. (3o Another

non-white "utio"

which eqioys an extremely high standard of living is the

island of Brunei. As with Bermuda, one does not have to look far to see the

reasons for Brunei's high standartl of living. These two island paradises are

totally atypical, but they indicate that there are many causes of poverty'

backrvardiess and oppression besides the universally proclaimed nonsense of

racismand Imperiafiim. (37) And, incidentally, of the far right's much trum'

petea geoeti" iiot""io"ity of blacks. (38) Which brings us to so'called racially

motivated violence.Fbequently, much is made of this by the media and by "anti-raclif" organisa-

tions, and atsurrl figures for racial incidents (meaning white on non-white)

including murders are bandied about from time to time. Yet consider the

followintstatistics. Between 1969 and 1987 ,2,618 people were killed and more

nan ssrdoo injured in the Tioubles inNorthern Ireland. (39) Northem lreland

nur u popot.tion of less than 1.6 million. (40) The majority of these thousands

of innocent people were murdered simply because they were Protestants or

Catholics. This is what white people do to each other; why should they behave

u"i or.*"uv toward.s non-whites? If there had been proportionately that

many racially motivated murders in Britain, we would be talking about a

virtual g"o*id". Then there is the well-documented case of the misreporting

anA cf'nicat exploitation of so-called racial attacks' (41)

Nor does the story end there. In the United States the most serious crime

problem is black on bhck A statistic which the current writer has often seen^bandied

about - one that is truly horriffing - is that one btackAmerican male

io zr mt eventually be murdered, mostly by other blacks. (42) Predictably the

socialists and their fellow travellers even blame t|olis onracism.l\e dispropor-

tionate number of young black males in prison (a {igure which is not so much

,no"f.i"g or scandalousj, is seen as the result of oppressrue policing, ethnic bias

in senteicing, and other such nonsense. The fact that moreyou-rg blacls may

be inherently dishonest, thuggish orwhatever, is dismissed asracist rhetoric'

(43)' in the wake of the genocide in Rwanda, the Socialist Workers Party crowed

that "The roots of Rwanda's civil war lie in the divisions caused by decades of

colonial rule bywestern powers and the deep poverty that the capitalist world

system has brought to Africa.

100

IOI

(09) 'se^Blrue {tBIq raqforo uaIJsH u! a il ol sao.r8ap seJJoJ auo ou,{peguls lsap.runruruoa 1;q fpq8p'11uus u1 e^Il ol aseulqJ arll seJJoJ euo oN'suoqte.I|lB lslJnot euoJeq rmqlJo ertros puz'sogaq8 eseulqJ eJB aseql 'uaroleulqJ su,(1pro1 u,$oml ,tlensnars qrlq,$ eseulqJ rluqla Jo sa^?Icua fieus punoJ eq usJ pFo1|A eqf ssoJrBsag;c.rofeu,(rrerrr r{'sa1;qn o1,{elos peuuuot lrusl fI q8noryp'1q69 a4qngououaruouaqd pa$e$e 11e,$ aql q s$[l (6t) ''tc]rls1p o.r6ap1p us q {teq uooss; ,tgtnu; slrtrf pus 'vro11o5 sao.r8alq;o ,{uo1oe u 'ppqslp IEIluepIsaJ al!qa{I",tlsnopra.rduolul sa,rom.{[rtrEJpaJoIoJ E uaql{furp^roqs suragud uopu.6g4J"

'ssaulsnq II,r[0.r;aq1 8u1pqru arnp erues aql lu a11q,lr slps.rnd Jaqlo puu sfsaralu! rslcupsug

u,rao Jleql ^roIIoJ ,{aq1 uaqn sJalErI puu slo8gq pepu"rq tugaq luesa.r ,(1pr-geqdma pou,{aq1 puu 'aq11 ppoqs,{aq1 uoq,$ ',(o1dua 1snu,{aq; ruoq,lr pue'aluposse lsnw ,taq1 uoqa rllpr p1o1 Sugaq fuasar ,(aq1 lpapu,ru1 ,tcu,r;.rd 4aq18q,req luasal a1doa6 (97) ,,'sa11q,n;o ,{oe,r;:d IelJos aql epu uI q ldwape uufnoqu se lo^eJ rtlunpe 1nq o.6ap aq1 .ro3 lueltrarusapB Jlurouora JoJ ealJp 3 sBJIa$I pazl4lqnd seq luetneaotr^J EqBIU U J eql. :suolsuel tluqfaJo,(1.r.rofuu$a^ eql JoJ suosuoJ IBaJ eql palmodugd oq,n ua8galg luqy 'q8noql 6sen 11

(1,7) 's:noqq81au 4aq1,(q uaql uodn pasodu.r eq pFoqsrtrslleluolot Jo rrrroJ ,$eu B lerll pa1sa38ns aq ,(1qpe.rru! erotn ua.rg (9r7) 'p;es

aq 5,,se,r1esuaq1 SuguraaoS;o alquderul a.ran ',tguepqla papp1p 'oq,n aldoedpaqg,r;eun,tueu ga1,tery,, ;upua.ra;ar SuIpIoq fnoqll,ra Eaql uo aruapuadapuJ6up.rog.ro; seFoloc JeuroJ Jleql,(q pans eq pFoqs sranod pgoloc,tuetn 1eq1paqqt psq puoldlp uur1rry us leql pagoda.r t66I reqotco vl sawll uopuorleqlq eplpu ug'11EupopueqeroJlnq 6maql uo usgpFadul Eqsodul.roglousrepr JerrrJoJ Jleql euelq slsgJel usc.HJV euos 6usl1uJ.radu1 ;o IIBJuaop eqllnoqe 8q.rq ol.ramod s1; u-r 8qqg.re,ro p[p luuollurl.reftrI lslIBIroS eqf a1;q,lr JoJ'19 pa puu arlsr rpqf a Eq ol fua r oq^r artros ere araql'q8noql flqpamul $y)'spJo,ra JoJ prnsqe oo; s1 ,l4unor oql ilaI a,ruq.taql .rage s.rea,(,{ueru appoua8.roy alqgsuodsa.r Eu;aq yo sellq,lr erg esntte o;. 'snoradso.rd pue alqqs ,{1a,rpqarse,n1g s.ranod leluolot eq1 ,tq pa1n.r sear et.rJry {tsltr appr fBW sJ rgn.r1 aql

(tt) ,,'qrFr eql puu sdoo.rl dra.rog aql lsupEealFn ol spuno.64req Jluqp IIU Jo su"pueArg .roy s1 1no ,{e,n 8upse1 ,t1uo ary

'"r.up pa8elgd a Bq qJlqa ser.ro; aq1{1aspa.rd luasa.rda.r,(arysuogep palpn eq1,:o sdoo.q qtua.{!I rtro{ uo.qnlos ou aq 11I,r araql

er\lsrlvlcos HscNn ruooSSuJ


Finally, Steffgen refers to the work of Dr Ernest van den Haag, who was thenProfessor of Sociologr at Nerr York University. Prejudices, he says, whetherettrnic, rcligious or racial, increase rather than decrease in proportion to tledegee of non-voluntary contact between separately identifiable groups. (51)In other words, people of all races resent being socially engineered andmanipulated, especially by those like the Socialist Intemational who exploitthem quite cpically in order to advance a political agenda.

The Poison Spreads

In addition to the decolonialisation of African and other nations, a newphenomenon has come about the process has been reversed. Non-whites fromvirtually every country on Earth have flooded into the white nations for amultitude of rcasons. A very tiny minority are bona fide refugees fleeing frompolitical and other persecution. Sone, in particular' Indians, are businessmen- the newmerchant class -nhoare expanding theirsmpires. Agreat manywereactually encouraged to immigrate to Western nations. After the SecondWorldWar therre was a so-called labour shortage in Britain, and the governmentthought the best rvay to solve this problem was to recruit cheap labour in theWest Indies. It may have been cheap at the time, but we have all of us paid ahearyprice ever since.

In a frrce market therc are no labour shortages, when labour is scarce, theprice oflabour (wages) rises, and the vacancies are soon filled. (52) Organisedlabourwas hostile to immigration, andnot simplyout of so'calledxenophobia.As state( when there is a labour shortage the tendency is for the eost of labourto rise, which improves the lot of the working people. Thus' the best reason fororganised labour to oppose immigration was a purely selfish one: competitionfrom non-whites in the home labour market would. depress wages. Ihe Com-munist Party though saw things difrerently. As early as 1955 it publisheil apamphlet calleil No Colour Bar for Bitain. This pamphlet argued speciouslythat "British public opinion in general is firmly against a colour bar, as anyonewho reads the newspapers will see", and that any sort of colour bar was thedesire of "a prejudiced minsrity". (53) The idea that the newspapers (ie the

L02

EOI

:{1a;oos u.ra1sa111noqEno.rq1 ooqel fl1enpp euoJeq aou seq 'sanssl prFololqaq1 ,(1p;eadsa pue 6sanssl JapI,$ aq1 'arur Jo uolssnJslp lBuo!|"r,{uu 1eq1 ,{uso1 uope.ra8fl?xa ou q U (99) 'uolluuuep puu arUIIaq Jo lrarql eql a{H uoIlBI-ndod uoxeg-opug aq;go speaq alg Je^o paple!^r q euueJ6oJd uollelrllrrJa$a;zep paFalp aq; '1no palulod eouo poo/rueg pJBqtIU sV 'eJeq uosaroqulaou spaau de4dup snopads sql uI lJuu{Jelq leuollotue Jo luatuela aq,[

'[duuo uoll"u1ruJega ue ssra nuqruq l"rn'suugolqq ,,a1qe1radsa.r,, ,{q -

a1e.r ,tue l" ^rou - peu!"IJ lou s! lI lerg lno 1u.rod o1 q;1 ppoit I 1nq daspr.raqlo

Jo lsluolslley ',[ro1sq uo eslleaJl e lou s! slql ssa4s I 'u;eEV] ,,'Z96T ulpasodrug lsJg a.re,lr sloJluot uollu.r8ruug uaqar uil1el su r neqtsq qsggg

" ot

puo.r aql uo daN lsJg et1l 'sduuur uogeulrrrJage s(ralllllyo seq;1od aq1 'nuqeeq

pue 4! rqJsnv Jo srllllod aq1 a.re uogepledar go srpgod aq1., 1816 pelqssl lI II a8ed u6'lsqt ples,{genlce dAtS eql'saa inuqouq ol peor aql uo dals1sJg aql epilf suor - a.ru .{aql se xBI - uplrr{ ur eJJoJ u; rtpea.rlu qo4uoo uopu.6-IEul aqf 'srpeue; a1.lQs1o41 asaql ol 8u1p:orry (99)'s1oauo3 uotto8nuutltsutoSv asoJ atu palpr lelqdued tuqs B u! p1p r(ge4 s.rergorll lsllsltoseql g1,6I q 1nq 's,na1'eql Jo aplroua8 pup paEalp aql Jo uopuaru ou se{Brtrroqfne qql la.req,nauos uopunba aql Jeluo ,(gunsn ilaqunq) so8'uyefry

euoililu palpunq e'uog1Lruua1 5uo.r11gu s :ulallJf, Jelue ol pa$Fu,rad aq o1 a.re,{.4unoe,(uu tuo.r; eldoad .rosallqa-uou,tueu,no11 'r(r;1od uope.r8luug us eluq lsnu,iqunor ,{ra,ra'apgsuegqoqdouax puc utsrcot'1eq1 s1 lreg a1du1s ary r(reunl sno! qo sI sFLl'slo4uoruopan8puu; IIB ol pue rre JoJ puy ieJuaso puad u 'saa u'acuego puad eapeu aq ol uopeulugJslp pgce.r.,{uy,, JoJ SIIBJ Ja oslog.roqlne'11 a8ed u6

'tro!f-e11o$xa lq1epradu1yo,{squey aqlgo ryed q qql'qeEy u-'usg1q;der qspFfl

Jo lgeuaq eql roJ rueql Jo lno pe{tns Sqaq s1 Wlsa,tr Jpql esne agr :seluolotJeqfo prru salpul lsel\ eql q peq os iuaar suolllpuoc ,(qm,(1pexa supldxeaq g eEed uO (tS) iuarlf roJ alqlssodu; ag1 Eulquu alnr qsplrfl go s.rra,(00€ su,rr u;ellJfl o1q uo;lu.r8grurul uelpul lse t JoJ uosser aqf l"rp.,{lsnogcadserortr ueae panfue puq eq ta;peg'c1a'sp.ropuel ,tq saeuy Jlaql u! peruuelss:oop 8u1,ruq 'a !I ol eJeqaeuos Supug punoJ ueilo sallrlra-rrou ,{tFogJIpaql palular roqlnu eql areqa a8ed snopra.rd aql uo u!"p aql .tq peplpu.rluoeasec,{uu u! sl req rnolor e ol pasoddo se,n uopldo cqqnd tsql lqult sgltr'lsua1 eq1,(us ol la^ou s1 '1aa.r1s eql u! us[u aql;o uo;u1do eql peueJ (ssa.rd,{.ro1

et/\snvtcos ufcNn uroct3Sul


The Rising Tide Of Colour: Flom TheYellow Peril To The Black Plague,And The Other Face Of Hatred

The virtually unchecked non-white immigration into Britain and other onceoverrrhelminglywhite nations has not beenwithout its benefits, but overall ithas caused far more problems than it has solved. In particular it has allorvedall manner of self-seekers besides the Socialist International to carve outlucrative careers for themselves in and around the race industry; it has alsoled to Draconian so-called "anti-racist" legislation which is, in some rcspects,more nepnessive thanwere the race laws of Nazi Gernany.

So-called positive discrimination and other practices' (57) in particularthequite blatant advancement of non-wlites in the media and other fields, oftenat the enpense of more talented whites, the ease with which cries of racismhavebeen used to stifle debate, legitimate criticism, or eYen to put some groupstotally above criticism, this and the falling white birth rate coupled with thebarely concealed pronotion of miscegenation by the media, and the ridiculingof their Anglo-Saxon heritage, has led some people to perceive the hidden handof a conspiracy at work lhe truth is that there arc many agendas at work here,but as things stand, the white race is on the way out' atthough some peoplewon't be satisfred until the last white woman has passed child-bearing age.

All tlis and more has led some white people to seek radical solutionsl oneof these solutions appears to be the re'emergence of a racial philosophy, oftenwith elements offascism attached to it or ouhight FascismA.lazism. (58) Manywhite people are worried bywhat they see as fhe rising tide of colour. This wasactually the title of a bookutich was published by Lothrop Stoddard as longago as 1920. In this the author refers to 'The world'wiile struggle between ttreprimary races of mankind - the 'conflict of color,' as it has been happily termed '

anil claims that this 'bids fair to be the fundamental problem of the twentiethcentury and...perhaps the gravest problem for the future.' (59)

104

s0r

slalupog ulotu.rT rapBal IZBN uuJlrerrv ary (79) 'ue$Btn IB.rJer uo uopspr sJqpassassod lou e^Bq s.r1aq pnlugds sgq 6,{laleungoJun 'uolsnpp u lnq pe.r1eqJo,(qdosogqd z,t1uo 1ou se IFad ̂ro1a aql paqu8orer ranlHJlopy.goqs u1

'araqBur-upldxa

ou peau lurp suo$ar .roy ,fto1sq go Ino ueg!.ftr ,tpa;nb treeq scq ,(qdosoJlqds,ral{H JIopVJo loadsu srql 'rrutr41 lrtr)I Jo rusp$ras-pus plqer eqf ilIIT

(€9) ".8uoleq

earplqaot uops4ll paq1;o pno.rd eq ol lq8lr arll e^Bq an se 1sn[ lsud ,r-raql go pno.rd aq ot lqAFaq1 a,req,taryu ro rno o1 eopadns q.trolqq lsed 4aq1 1eq;,(leerJllupe I pu€rsuopzzJlpr.rc luapue o1 Euolaq,{aq;, 'saalesrno ol ro.r.ra;q6ugaq su asauudel aqlJo eseutq3 aq1 pap.ru8a.r Jaaau aaeq Iu :pIEs aq.(le.raua8 sJqua.uo Jo eI$L!\

(29) ,,'salJlunotoerl rno allun qtlqia spuoq eql fttq8g eJortr,taerp o1 sn aEannoJue IJSAI fI ra erreql alortr.raq lcadsa.r pue alegra.rddu o1 sn rpuat JI1AI JEtr sFII TuagJ B ptru,tgu ue ulBrtri'.r s,(aqe gn uudel"sn .rogu :snql arlods Jerqq{ aq1 raup eq1 ;oepue8udo.rd uetgeruv eql uo Suguauuoc nTye'9p61'91 ,ftun.rqeg uO 'qrns

su l! petunouep peepq pue 'pa.r1eq yo ,t8oloap; uE sE f! paqu8oce.r nq IFeiIÂolJaI aq1 paleafa.r ,(1uo ;ou tftolsq vt lslJDt sno.rJolou lsou aql ,(lpasoddns'rap II ylopy',{lprporJ allrad ^roile1 aql ul Jallaq aqt sl esle ;ut1,ta roJ 'pe.rpq

5o ,{Eo1oop1 uu Eugu8udo.rd se,lt eq ';g eqpa.r &uplp preppolg qSnoqly'acBJ ot urual lsnru,tlpgradsa

UBW atIrLlI eql leql .t1.tpa.r aeu eql q sgl pue 'uetrg allrl!\ eql Jo asoql op sBuaqf JoJ qrnru sE lunoo saldoad raqlo IIBJo pue'asauudel'eq1go suopu.r.rdsuaql nq 'erBJ rr,no slq JoJ Supluads ,t1sno;,rqo su,r.rossa;o.rd ary (19) ,'gansB seJBJ Jerllo aql JoJ Inq 'sare.r elgqn aql JoJ apeu lou serd, plJo/rr aq,L! :snqluedul';o ;uEep o.r4n(g rossaJord salonb eq {ooq slq trJ 'uolsnlap

" sI sFll

1Fed/noIIaA"lnqrorrqf,pag u,tpo1oupe8esprua's.raq1o a41!.ruppo15',(1a1eu-qJoJ-ql e0Z6I sB o8e 3uo1 su ue$lr,lr ueeq aêq.{1pe.r sp.ron aseqf plnoJ

(09) ,,'ru,|A ss?Ir ol ss llear se IEpUJ ol lueE-ellJu! qsmaq s.wslaaqslog JoJ IenJ sg'uogeugu.r.rJsIp IuIJos,tra,ra 6acue ,a!6pq111od,fta,ra'uo.r1e.4dse lslpuopeu,&ra,r,g'atua,ra.r pue peJFqJo 1adso3.r1eq1ueru peJoIoJ pelueluoJslp Jo s.rea eq1 q radsJpl s-rolqpe {.râqslog 'salqs

palpn eql pue 'eopauy u.qe1 'erg;y 'elsv uI 'aqo18 aq1 ;o .ra1.runb ,iramu!$ :aouslsr! lsJU aql u! uo$seJr sl! roJ pue rualqo.rd qq1 go aruafuaue aq1.ro3 - uopJdo s.JalFAr ltreJJnr eql u! uosua.r;uugodul lsow aql - suosua.r erilJoauo se,n sB'alBJnJrE sen ualqord aou.r Eu$.raua uu;o,(seqdo.rd s,p.ruppolg

ev\lst]vrcos H=GNn Noo3f ul


who was assassinated in 1967, suffered from similar delusions to LotlropStoddard, though instead oftheYellow Peril he sawthe Black Plague; this isactuallythe title of a chapter in Roclcwell's boolc, Wite Power.Apparently, theblacks or indeed all the non-whites of the world, are going to rise up and smashus. At the very least they will outbreed us, something they are doing any{iay.Here is what Rockwell hatl to say about the so-called Black Plague:

"To stop a plague of bed bugs takes killing, not words.To stop a plague of traitors, agitators and black half-animals is going to take

killing, notwords.Locusts and bed bugs which do not invade your home do not need killing.

Inferior humanity which leaves the White Man alone does not need killing,either, and can be left to limit their own numbers by their own stupidity,improvidence and cruelty.But it is forever too late for those colored people who ATMCK the White Man

to be permitted to sunive.We have no intention of attacking of exterminating those who leave us alone.But let this be a declaration of war upon those scwages who dare to shout 'Kill

WhitE),' and on those Jews and others who dare to encourage, agitate, arm andfinance them in this bloody insanity.

It's them, or us!" (65)

It is diflicult to credit that these words were vritten by a graduate of BronmUniversity. Rockrrell's claim that what he refers to as infeior humanity can beIeft to limit their orvn numbers by stupitlity, inprovidence and cruelty isparticularly ironiq it is dillicult to read anything but cruelty into these words,thougb at a push one can add both the stupitlify and the improvidence he railsagainst, because it was certainly both stupitl and improvident to have uarittenrhis, and to act like this - as he did throughout his political eareer. Certainlysuch bellicose pronouncements andcold, rational hatred do much to maskthegenuine grievances ofthose whites who seek to preserve their heritage, theyalso playinto the hands ofthe Socialist International and others,rvhoseraisond'€fte is to destroy it.

Again, it must be stressed that the Black Plague is every bit as much adelusion as the Yellow Peril before it. I'm not saying that the Los Angeles riotsor other riots befort tlem werc an optical illusion. Nor am I saying that the

106

FREEDOM UNDEH SOCIALISM?

race riots we have experienced in Britain are a fantasy; inileed they have

certainly been played down by the media at the behest of the government and

under pressure from the race industry and other vested interests.

ThJ current uriter has long been in touch with people in both far right

movements and in the media who have confirmed the truth of this. Racial

violence is not a fantasy, and it maywell be that most racial violence in the (still

but rapidly diminishing) predominantly white world is directed against white

people ratler than by them. The Black Plague is a fantasy because the picture

it puiotr is inherently flawed: the world is not made up as the so'called

"aiti+acist" lobby would have us believe of whites and non-whites. (66) We have

already mentioned the reality of black on black crime.Ihis, and most of all the

history of modem decolonised Africa, is surely proof enough that blacks are

""".y bit ur *pable of brutalising andmurdering each other as theyarewhites,

orwhites them.Ihis scenario is repeated across the world, as is inter-ethnic violence. Some

of the worst racial violence in Britain has not been so'called Nazi and skinhead

gangs attacking non-whites but the violence between various walring clans of

Liuor in areai like Southall, West London. And we have alreadymentioned

Northem Ireland. Inciilentally, during the LA riots, Korean shopkeepers were

targetedalongwithwhites, andit is insufficient to say thattheywere sotargeted

simpty by freebootersl there has been much genuine resentment against

troreans in the Uniteil States the same naythere has been against Asians here.

They are both envied and resented for their commercial success by the indigen'

ous population who wonder why these Johnny Come Latelies can enter the

country and in a few years own their own businesses, even tlough many of them

can't even speak good English, when they, the natives, are stuck in menial,

low-paid jobs, or living off welfare. This is not so much racial hatred as

ignorance of economics. (67)It is easy for most people to see such delusions as the Black Plague and the

Yellow Peril nowadays, but the biggest delusion of all is racism. Earlier we

touched on the Protocols Of Zion; this and other conspiracy literature port'

rayed the rising Jewish merchant class of the late Nineteenth and early

Iiventieth Centuries as part and parcel of an all-encompassing megalithic

conspiracy. The bogus theory of racism is yet another conspiracy theory for

just -as

the Jews were saiil by the peddlers of the Protocols to control the-economy,

the banks, the government and virtually everything else, so racisz is

107


meant to exclude all non-whites from positions of power in the WesternEstablishments.

1n1992, an article published in the (now thankfully defunct) anti-male hate"feministn magazine Spare Rib claimed that AIDS had been created in a USlaboratory and that its purpose was to eliminate Afro-Americans by the year2000. A secret memorandum to that effect was said to have been found. (6E)Who would believe such lunacy? A lot of people' apparently. Indeed, as I writethese wordsn this modem day blood libel has been given further credence. Adoctor visitingZimbabwe is said to have launched his new book in the capital,Harare. It is calledl.ids - Origin, Spread and Healing, and, claims that AIDS isnot transmitted sexually but by agents in the air and food, and that it wasdeveloped as "a well'orchestrated move by the governments of s ome developingcountries to reduce the African population and 'subtly re'introduce colonial-ism'." (69) Incidentally, this doctor is said to be German; (70) onewould havethought that in view of all the libels that have been visited on his race thiscentury, that he, indeed any highly intelligent and educated German, wouldhave more sense.

Now replace this slur on the United States government (the SpareRlb versionabove), with the claim that AIDS was manufactured not by those damnedrccisfYankees but by the Jews, and see the reaction this draws. In this and manyotler respects the theory of racisrn parallels that of the Elders of Zion: dark'nysterious forces, secret meetings, the ruling 6lite of white Anglo-Saxon malesexcluding all non-whites from positions of power, and so on. (71) Where onceJens and blacks were fair game for baiting by the bigoted and scapegoating bythe malevolent, now the white Anglo-Saxon male can beo and vera often is,blamed for all theworld's troubles.

The Fear OfABlackPlanet -And RacialDeath

The non-white exodus into the white nations, and all the other trappings ofgovernmentally forced race-mixing, (72) socialist-inspired bullying and indoc-

108

60r

'Euallluues qcns ploqoqrl salqlr fpo lou q t! '(pro,ta ra$eq e aq ppoAr esuitslp sduq.rad) walqotdeil{,ta s ,fia.rnd sE II e paIFJ-os qq1 ,tu.r1.rod ol auFlturu eleq ls11sltos eql

Jo sgoge lsaq erlt Jo a11ds u1 'U^a q uopuuaSacqru o1,{11g1soq 1aql ,{lprauaiarou sduqrad .ro tpa sI IB ! rns allqil feql JeIIeq eql ss peugep eq lseq uet

11 's,{epelrou 1u 1e 8ur-ueau,{uu seq usnDJpJo,ra eql sB JBJ sV 'uarpgqepuar8

-1ua.r8.r1eq1 ol pue 'ue.rpgqrpue.r8 4aqt puu ueJpl-rqt Jleql of saua8.r1aq1 uossud o16s111.ram;eqn'aEelFeII rleql aa.rasa.rd o1 saldoed leJo lqEF eql q 11

@4) ldualuor pue pe.r1eltr olul rslnrgJed ug uof;1et qspof aql8u$uprqpue rrrsp.rues-lfus Jo serg aql Sulgany ,(qa.raql 'pa.r1eq 1elJu.t lrJtto Jlaqt JoJaldoad qs!$af erllue eql leoSadecs ol erull eruus eql ls pue sepua8e 1uep11odnrao Jlaqf JeqlmJ ot alq" a.ru,taq1 ,te,ra qq1 uI Gr) 'sad,(1oanals cplwas-puus,1qE!.r rsJ oql o1 dn ,te1d ot lseq Jlaqf op uaryo pue 'segoaql ,(ru.rldsuorqcns a8ulnotslp of Eu.rqlou ro epn op suopusJuufuo FlrsuJ-puu pel1ut-ospue 1quog2'qslaaf ,{uuu 1ua:E e 1eq1 pIBs aq of suq;r'a.rouraq}md 'pa lolqa.ru suopesguefuo pue slunp!4pul qspref qr1rac pq1.{1uo a alleq pus s,rref JopaJlurtr luuos.rad ou a,req,taql se qtnusut4 selluas-nuu lou eJB ueqlyo,{uuwpeepq puu'a.rarugs ,(ilelot are,{.roaq1 ,{ce.qdsuor s1q; ep8edo.rd oqn aldoadeqlJo lsotr J'aspJ,{1qe.r1suouap s111 's1.roga lsaq rleqlJo agds q 1nq (vL)'?/Jopoddns u1 sluaunfue Euo.rls ,fta,l1no apuru a,r,uq aldoad 1uaftqalq r(1q8q auos'paapq !ggo acel eql uo spunos l! ss pmsqu su fou s!JeIIeq qqtr'fae.4dsuoeqslaef IsuollerrJaluJ ellsu.r.rad-1p eql Jo lar.rud puu ged q uopeue8arqrulurg JeIIeq eqt of eruapert 8ul,rf fq8lr JsJ eql uo aldoad ,{ueu o1 pal s"qrrrsllEtroll"r al$pr pu? ssausnolJsuot IslcsJ alFlnso uroJ i{uulo sdno.6 aseql,{q uopelcosse lualqsrad eql r"Inrlgud ug'sdno$ eseql 11u,tq (gf) a8el;.requoxeg-opuy ellqaJnoJo uopu.fruap aq1'goddns qqlraf Euo.rls pa41s qtlqiasuopuquefuo 1spya1 ,{uuu pue 6suo,r1uque3.ro lsluolz puB qsl,$af-opnasd'qs!,r,raf uluueJ Jo asoql aJ? ereq {Jo r l3 sepuaEu elEIInIoJIIn lsoltr aql

'sepue8e rLlro rlaql JarIUnJ ol JepJo u1 6s1qppos,(1du1s 1ou'sdno.6.tueu,{qpa.rnpnu q luqlpa,r;sq ppu.ru'aldu.rspuea.rndpe.qerlIBltBrq ErlL zirolsgq go le11ot eql uarop paqsng q - 11 a ,tpua.raqul 'asrc ,tuu ug 'sg

qr.rqlr- arerellqaaqlJ! re$Brtrl.usaop ll oroJereqf letp puu lspeluseop ll tsql1nq ta1;utu l.useop l! 1eql1ou '1sge l,useop atur luql u1ult ol JFoleqJ lsIIsIJospJepu"ls sg ;; 'qefu'appouaE yo !.roqs u1 'uollcuuxa Julcar Jo ',t1a1annrru

a.rorn 'ro laue1d {tBIq B Jo JBOJ eqf :JaeJ IE J ,f,ra,r e - eldoed algqm,tuuu ,fta,r.ro;- puu taqlouu 1; qprlq8no.rq seq'r1a'sdpdmer aleqalpl.n-puu 6uopeuprl

ey{snvr3os H30Nn v{oo33uJ


In 1987, the Economirt reported that the Minister for Thade and Industryof the State of Singapore, Brigadier-General ke Hsien Loong, had called onSingapore's Chinese to have more childrenl the countrywas said to have hadperhaps the world's lorrest birthrate. Not only did Singapore's Prime Ministerendorse this policy, he was said to be an unabashed advocate ofeugenics, andindee4 the falling birth rate was to be boosted by the provision of linancialincentives. Although the article stressed the importance of economic factors,it is impossible to read anything but the fear of racial death into the Ministers'pleas. (77)

Further proof of this comes from the bland admission that'immigrationcannot be expected to help...Singapore has strict controls (only 3'893 immi'grants became citizens last year)...' (78) The Socialist Workers Party have beenstrangety silent over Singapore's immigration policy (or perhaps one shouldsay non-immigration policy). After all, aren't those Oriental Nazis well on theroid to Dachau?

A more open manifestation of racisrn occurred in China. The Britishnationalist magazine Spearhead rcported in its June 1980 issue that studentsand workers had rioted over the presence of foreign exchange students inkking. Demonstrators had carried placards which read' Black devils, and'had'shouted "Go back to Africa and fight the imperialists!" Chinese women weneassailed for fratemising witl blacks. (79) Is this really racial hatred? Or is itsimply a violent rrcaction to a perceived threat, the survival of one's genes?

Yet another example of non-white racism is given by Professor Quigley'whotells us that "[In Japanese society] all non'Japanese, lacking divine ancesfi'arr basically inferior beings, existing only one cut above the level of animalsand, accordingly, having no basis on which to claim any consideration' loyalty'or consistency of treatment at the hands of Japanese." (80) Obviously suchhaditions totally refute the nonsense of such insidious Marxist fronts as theInstitute of Race Relations. My own (very limited) experience of the Japaneseleads me to believe that they are not an anti-social people, certainly they areno more anti'social than most whites. Perhaps thougb, like most whites' andmost peoples of all races, they simplywant to be let alone?

Examples of such blackracisnt are not difficult to find either: the followingwill sullice. Ihe powers-that-be at Cornell University, Ithaca, were not pleasedthat students tended to segregate thenselves by race; a plan to forcibly

110

III

aJa r anbJquuzotr{ rtroJJ stue.6tuu! IBBaIU lsql pqJoder oEuarSord s,$eu{101160 6 sdJ, f,gg ?eqsHqnd se]|[ elrlus sarull w eql eroJeq {aea eq,l

OB) ipaggpale arueJ aql6uneqgo {Iu1 ueê se,m ereqf, 1no s,enblquuzo141daarl ol lnq'q s{illq s,E .rrry qlnog daarl ol loN'anb;quuzotrq 8ulrnoqqS.raupu?

"JFJV q$os uee qeq errreJ raproq eql pueue ol paplrep puq qepuBtr^T

apBJEoJ Jo fuarnu.ra,lo8 u lsltal-llue,taql feql perunouuu - uopuol u; paqsgqnd.radudsrau uurI.UV q1nos e - saull ZS' eql ueqil auur IIBJo {Joqs paEil1q aqtr

$g) 'acuaeq ro1,{gaqq ua4el-slu p"q,{aq1 uaql Eu11a1 s.ragoddns Ierlpur arou slq peploJs aq uo!s6)roauo uO 'srretrrry qtnos IIE roJ ernlnJ re$aq B pllnq o1 slsqq;dur rrBrFJVqnos qlpr{ro rol papele suq elapuetr{'ec.uy qlnosJo {ro^rouw;lqp11deeaql apueuslp ueql rerller .roy trud per aql u1 s.ra4o[ eql eq ol Ino paurnfq8noql aaeq fueurrrJaro8 Xtr1y lspnrurtror pallur-os ,r{eu slq pue Blepuetr^J',ftlunoc lue.6 leqt u! trolluslll4r roJ IIoDI q1rap oql eq ol sql Supcadxa'paueo.r8 lq€lr rEJ aq1 'panore ilaI rBJ eql ep-Wlt'ur!.{w {nos 1upur-plnu^nau eqlJo Suaplsard eql se Blepuetr^l uosleN,,Jeuosprd 1ecpr1od,, u.ra18uo1 puulsForrel rerruoJ aqlJo uolpele aqllr qlur lq8no.rqppqgudygolleleql'utstzorpa[uc-os $oqu q;n4 aql Jo pue 'ale.r go pafqns .tu.roq1 eql uo ,tq.rcod,tq puusprupue;s alqnop rleql Jo uaa$ aq ppoqs aldruexe .req1m; auo .neqruq ot peoreql lnoqu EpueEudo.rd Jlaqf pue spua!.{I Ja{Jol[ lsIIBIroS.rno ol Equrnpg

(t8) ',,sarBr roIJeJuIu Jlaql e sq osIB s{Jelq leql pareôJslpoqra BlqlEuN ug ,ftuuogssptr uptnreg erg Jo asBt eW pe*r,(puaqe a uq e/n',(t1uul.{ (€g) X.ua.raril i{aq1 11ag aqs ,t1rea1a !*aldmuxa uB 1as ol pepadxa a.re a,{ac;1qnd aq1 u1 aldoed 1re1g,, lerll p;us raluasa.rd rg, qcelq etrO 'ul"psp r$!rr uog-eua8aequ,tl.rrqeleo pallec-os ̂ri,IA ruauon:1au1q,t1ppadsa 's{rulq InJssamns,(uuu 1eq1 paleeâr ?661 5qarey41 u1 sau11 topung aqf u.r peqsilqnd alepru ug

'ernfrnrls,{guuy elg1,rr eql puu {rBIq aq1 qloq 8up{o.r1sapeft pul{ Jeq puu arls ernlJn4s ,tguey {rBIq aqf 8ulFeuup,(p.rarn rtro{ JEJpuu'lre1.raqfiq u a4o:q r(lupger u?ruo r sFlI (ZB) ,,lre1raqEJq auos 8upparqJo pus 'pLrqc r1ce1q aqlJo speau aq1 Eu.r.rou8J;o 'am1cn.r1s ,{1r-uuy 4cqq aql Eu;-Beruep,go pupl Jaq puu Jaq pasnrr" oq/ra uertro,${Julq fnq s11"r euoqd aagsnqeqf!$ raq pafepunq oqrl. stspDt (aflq,$) IHtoI f.use,$ lI leql pasr.rdrns suta ptrzaEe.r.r.ruu lultuJ-ralulJo pafqns eql uo radedsaau IeJoI s,tq pa,na;,r"ra1u! sBAruurtr )pulq B ol pt!ilsrtr se/ra oq r qfuoeg 'e$e.u"W u! ueruoa aIWA V (Ig)

's{Jelq uo.q,t6reprp.rud'1sa1ord snoraJlro^ o1 papa[qns ssra sea.rs lellueplser uleu eql ap.r8alu;

al/\|snvrcos Hf oNn y\oc33ur


being rounded up and sent baclc (87) South Africans of all races were said tobe blaming illegat immigrants for driving down wages, taking indigenouspeople's jobs, dealing in drugs, and increasing street crime. Sound familiar?As far as I am able to ascertain, none of the so-called "anti'racist" press inBritain devoted as much as a paragraph to this supposed outrage.

The Doctrine Of *Racism":

Sictq Evil, Manipulative

The most sickening thing about the doctrine of racism as perpetuated by thesocialist left is the way it smears all whites as bigots if they reject any degreeof forced rass-pi*ing or if they express the slightest antipathy towards thegenocide these monsters have planned for them' And for all mankind-

In September 1991, the boxer Michael Watson collapsed in the 12th roundof his super-midtlleweightworld title challenge against Chris Eubank (88) Asa result ofwhat for all boxers is an occupational hazaril, he nearly died. (89)

Michael Watson is blaclg of course. Boxers are not usually renowned for theirinnate modesty, but Watson, although always quietly confident, was never ttesort of person to shoot his mouth off outside the ring. Even after he defeatedhis arch-rival Nigel Benn in six thrilling rounds in May 1989 he remained thequiet, personable young man he hail always been. Although lacking the char-isma of the likes of the flamboyant Benn or the anogant (and at times offensivemiscegenist) Eubanlg lVatson won much public support.

After the fight had been stopped, it was evident immediately that the26yearoldWatson was in grave, and almost certainlylife-threatening, trouble. In thewake of the fight the hospital switchboard was deluged with calls ftom frghtfans. (90) IVere all those fans black? Were all the people who later raised fundsfor MichaelW'atson black? (91)

Likewise, were and are all the people who have donated countless millionsof pounds, francs, Deutschmarks, dollars and shekels to African'orientedcharities black? Are all these people nascent Nazis or foaming-at-the-mouthanti-blackracrfs because they are opposed to unrestricted non-white immigra'

t12

etr

eql SupfluJad u1 'papgurtrot suq lI uls InJlae eql JoJ uolIBII .rno uop.rud lprpog 1eq1fu.rd 'f,.r1unoe sIIIJo pue!{ rlrse lel1, :snql srepear s;; o1 quaddu pue'lolsprg yo au,{6 T '^eU eqf ,tq ,,palsall? ,t1p;,, eq ol p;es sl NIVJ1Y) TnfI)-VgWNn uo lo opto tq ryoae ol paffio1g sDlvr ol{/kl'o8a1t1 apuag o {o nptnTalgHJ IO JNnOJJvNV.epeJl a BIs aqt lsqu8e paddu uupslrqJ u paqqlqnd.(lapog peqtr snoF;pg aq1 66991 se o8e Suol sV 'etglns 1;lr saldruuxa;o aldnoe

V'uF{ rr,lro .4aq1 lsqeEe ua1;o 6sele: Jeqlo Jo suls aql ,{q paqrluru $ull 1u eru,(aq1 'salgqn-uou;sugu6e aJer eflqlr aql Jo sqs eql Je elBIIAr tanornraqpmg

:(uuw.{l lsIIBItos ol pasoddo a.ru oqn gu,{qpalJn4suoJep,tlpnlua.ra lnqpapafa.r,{11e1o1,(po lou eqlsnrull uossiu sFIf JoJpuu 'pa.r1aq IeIJBJ Jo uIJoJ alsurllln eql sl ,LlusrtoJ-rlrre,,

'IIe Jo 1so141 ',(1go[uu

a1;q,n aq1 8qspuu.r,t1 pue Supqnd;ueru qloq Jo suuartr e pue rs.ra11a.le.rl ^roIIeJrleql prre sls11sltos aql JoJ luauaslpue.f8e-y1as go poqfau u ',t8oloapg pllelrosroJ alrlqel B ueql ssal Sugqlou s! qtlqa (,,utsrzoJ-nuq,;o ldacuoe aq1 aptno.rdol lnq',tlapos uupr41p8a eJoru uaae.ro !sn[ a.rou telpg u alouold ol lous1 asod.rnd esoqlr auo puu ldaruor prp;1od u f1a.r11ue sg 's.ra11a,ranl aoIIeJ 4eqlpus l'al IsIIElros aq1 ,(q pqquurtr Jo lsal aql oluo pa$IoJ se'tusttot lnq '$Fe

s6ulqt esarf,L'Itreqf auopuoJ .ra,rau.tlupget ppo,lr 1 puu 'pa.r;eq 1e!t"J ua a.ro'frlo8gq'ecJpnfe.rd IsIJeJJo eouafsfe aql elndqp o1,{en,{ue q qsFAlotr op J6up6y'lrou,(qepuu ueeq aaeqpFoqs lulod aq11nq'uga,t qqlu; uo oEplnor I

;ellq,$ eq ol uaJpllqtpue.f.r;aq1 1uu,t,teq1 asnetaq.ro 'asuadxa

s.uuu {JsIq aq1 1u arlof puolsetJo uu rpe.ro f,aq1 asneeeq,(1du;s tol ,tp4.q,{eq1ate to'pnoJoloH urou eql JoJ uope.ruda.rd u1 .rarlunq EuryeX1 s.,{gu; IeuolfuNqsplJg eqlu! sraquloqc n33uyp11nq ,rrou ue,ra,taql eJV AslzBN luarseu',{upo1aldoed a1;q,ngo ,{1l.ro feu aq1 a.re pue 'plagsuury pJol seXl ilalqEnep qq ,{.r.ruupFortrs o.6ap e 1eq1 uopsaSSns ereu eql uolsgr er lsouln eq1 qgnpap.re8a.raauq lou plnofi arl tuql Jo 'auoq slq o1 - o.6atr1,(ue - o"6atr1 e pa1;,ru! e^uq plnoi$

tp 1e ueuqsil8ug ,tue Jo 'ueruqqlEug ssup .raddn .{ue .ro neq ILLT uI luqlitrstcot fex fue uI lou se,n a8pnf aues sgp tpql a alJeq o1 palredxa e,r eJV

(96) ',,aq1ua.rq o1 a,le1s ^{uu.rog a.rnd ool q puepug

Jo rlB eqJ4 esnEceq InJr$slun eq ol uopuelap sFI parsltsp plausuBtr J pJorl'?rl?uuf JoJ punoq seruBrtrI aql u1 6u;,(1 d;qs u p.ruoq uo suo4 q ppq sanr oq,rra

"Is {rslq E Jo ewalar eql parepJo a8pnf qq18ug,ve lLLl su oEe Euol sy

(26) 'f,up1noar uoqlJo;sou,{1a.rns sy ;,{guey rlaql olu! Jo'auoq .rgaq1 olul {JBIq e auoJla,rr lou ppo,n,{aq1 asnsteq JO 'a.ru uaqlgo ,tuuu,tlpalqnopun sV esel4unot qq,!r,(pueuluopa.rd .raq1o ro ululFg olq uoll

el/tsnvrcos utoNn u\oo3f uJ


practice so long to exist; and beseech him in his providence to prevent it frombeing in any degree revived here, or from being entered upon by other nations."(et7

In 1811, a man named Arthur Hodge was tried, convictedo sentenced todeath, and hangedforthe murder of aNegro slave called Prosper on the islandof Tortola. (95) Slavery was abolished in Britain in 1833; and in the UnitedStates (the Thirteenth Amendment) in 1865. By contrast, it was abolished inIraq onlyin L924 and, in Ethiopia in1942. (96\

Slavery still exists in many countries, although it isn't always recognised assuch. The Anti-Slavery Society is still extant. (97) As recently as June 1995 itwas reported that non-whites resident in Britain were keeping their serrantsin what amounts to virtual bondage. (98) One might add also that the 14th and15th Amendments in the United States gave Negroes the vote (with poll taxesand literacy tests), while women received the vote only in 1920, with the 19thAmendment. And in Switzerland, women received the vote only in 1971!

The fact that a white man was hanged in 1811 for the murder of a Negroslave proves thateven a slavewas regardedas worthyof life bytheWhite Man'ssystem ofjustice (99) even then. Horv much was a black man's life worth underthe government of Idi Anin? (100) How much is it worth now in uar-tornRnranda if he happens to belong to the wrong tribe? (101) Further commentwould be superfluous, yet all we in the West ever hear about is the evils ofsomething called, racisrn One pundit has written poetically that "All thingsconsidered, I pnefer discrinination without murder to murder without dis-crimination." (102)

The End OfThe White Race, AndThe Fascist "Solution"

Tlnre EconomrJts'claim that Singapore has perhaps the world's lowest birth-rate is, unfortunately, not correct. (f.03) ln \947, a United States senatorpublished a book in which he claimed - probably correctly - that with thecurrrnt rate of intermariage, in only nine generations the white race would be

1L4

9II

'd;qs.ro1u1cgp 61roqs u1 ':a,nod;o uollssllu4lral tqf uo pasuq luernrr.leao8;oua1s,{s e ,{g.rerupd s1 1.t ',(reualdns elFl^r lou s! ltrslzuN 'slrefqns IBlEoIoc Jlaqt

Xsup8u qqp;.redu1 uuedo.rng eql ,(q paqlce.rd se,la qr.Iqa,{ceua.rdns aryqneql ol pepnile osp a^uq aX1',tqdoso1.rqd ppe.r e,{g.ressarau ueae Jo,(gruu;.td

lou q usIJsBJ IBIII ,tpra.rp poluJlsuouop a Bq oX1'a6u1gaq 1epar s.euo Jouopu,rresard aql puo,taq.reg o61eq1 sacuanbesuot e sq rnslJseJJo SIIIJoJ Jeqlopue us;zsN 'asuc ,tuu uI 'petrretuoJ sI a.rnfsrr uertrnq a.raqn,(lu1cadsa 'auo

pe.r.rocaq1 S,{anqBlous!uopnlossno! qoeq1 're,ranog'ua1qo.rdppu.rsno! qo

uB ol uopnlos snolaqo eql suees ,tqdosogqd lepe.r V'Esp?N lroqs q ',tqi[o

-sogqd p.rcur u .uopnlos eql a,req,(aq1 am11eq's.rossetcns puu sapru.rodueluocrlaq; 'uup.rof uIIoJ '1aru1coa ulotu.Irl sB qtns aldoad pap;nis;u auog

(691) ;Pe,uasarilaq q'.raq;o,{us.ro a8el;.raq uoxuS-o18uy ellqa E 1; aq 'e8q;.req lBql s! aoq s!uopsanb Elq eq;'1u llJns ellqArJo uollou.rqndodun leqaauos eql tulpnlcu;.e8e1!.req rlern eAreserd o1 saldoad pgo lq8p eqt q lI'q8noql paluxs sv (80I)'ueq{ufistr s.tno1 3uu1s1 Jo uollsN aql Jo repsel pap;nEqut 31 tpeuslrsqr eqfEulpnpq'c.rryuag-pue se peJBaEs puu slsltseJ sB pe{tellu eJB sts.tt"r ellq,rtyo suol1u.r;dsu eql eJuqs oqlr srIJsIq ua,r'g (41) 'eflues'lftrB uu se '.{1sno.r.rna'uaryo pue 'ls1rsey '\s1cot e sE pa.reelus eq ru,r f1;gqe-r1sap s11 uopsanb puu

arsr slq Jo qlBep fEellluu1 aql 1o ,{g1EeJ eql etal Plno^r oq^| ellq,la ,{ue 'up6g

(9g1) 'sa;quq (a1;q,n,tJpleadsa) 1o Japrnu sseu peqpEal aql pue puslmpuo uo-rgoqe;o quauodo.rd c;lsqsnqlue osp a.ru [a1s] uo;1e1s@1 eluq-$uue,rpsa.rda.r eJortr pus aJoItr puutuap,tpuulsuoo oqa rsrs!tr.r'$us! pe$IuuoJertrss eqf 3o ,{uuu os 1eql peapu! rluorl s! lI (90I) u'suo11u.raua8 rnoJ rtlJusepe rs eJoln ou aq 11lia aloql 6uoos aluJ ltr4q reqEq E e Bq uepeas u! ualtroareqf ssepn luql pelcullse uaaq seq lL leql eloJ r.rau8Jeduur uolgoqu-lluuuu 6uoprypa.rd Suplcoqs sFg rege s.rua,(,$.to; eratn V (791) 'ucgauy E! Itu!$a

e]/lsnvrcos u30Nn l/\|oc33ul


Fascism And Socialism: Siamese T\vins

"Lenin, the founder of Bolshevism, and thus of Fascisn..." (110)

Ihe conventional political spectrum nay be represented by Figure 2. (Lll)

Dictatorship Democracy Dictat

Communism Fabian Socialism

However, this is a total distortion; what sort of spectrum has the same thing(dictatorship) at both ends? An accurate political spectrum is the one shoumin Figure 3 (page 117).

116


Total Government

CommunismSocial ismFascismNazism

Anarchy

ConstitutionalRepublicLimited Government

Figure 3: Ihe reader will see that there is nothing here about race at all, andat the riskof boringhim Iwill repeat the factthatno form offascism (indudingNazism) has to be anti-Semitic, anti-black or anti any particular efhnic group.Ib paraphrase George Onrell, if a boot is stamping on your face, the ethnicorigins or political afriliations of the owner of the boot make little difference.

Ihe appeal of fascism, and nore parochially, of Nazism, can be sumned upin the phrase 'AIl within the state, none against the state'. In reality, fascismadopts a similar power structure to that of socialism, one knonm by the curiousoxJimoron of I)emocratic Centralism. (112) Before returning to the racialideolog of Nazism, let us take a closer look at the power structure and brieflyreview the history of Nazism from llitler's rise to power.

r17


Nazism: The Benign Face OfAuthoritarianism

A stock charge against Hitler is that he was a dictatory a stock charge againstthe Nazis is that theywere totalitarians. The lirst of these assertions is partlytrue; the second is demonstrably false. Professor Quigley tells us that the Nazir€gime was not totalitarian in either theory or practice but authoritarian,because two members of the Quartet were not coordinated, and although theeconomic system was not ruled by the state it was subject to'self-rule'. (113)IntheWeimar Republicrthe quartet of powerwas Army, Bureaucracy, Industryand Landlords. Under the Nazis this became a quinteh Nazi leadersr lndustry,Army, Bureaucracy and Landlords, (114) though it doesn't take much imagin-ation to fathom who had the final say.

In Hitler's Germany, the landlords gained economically; prices fixed by theNazis were not high but were adequate. "Pa5ments for interest and taxes werrcboth reduced...' (115) There is, by the way, some evidence that the Nazis hiedto reform the comupt, debt-based money system. Or at least, sone of tlem did.The author of the NSDAP's programme was not Adolf Hitler but GottfriedFeder, who espoused similar ideas to Major Dougfas. Breaking the thraldomof interest was a major plank of this programme. Howeve4 in 1934, Feder waspurged, (116) and by and large it was business as usual for the money creators.

According to Professor Quigley, the Nazis rejected totalitarianisnl thosewho wanted a "second revolution" were purged in June 1934. The reader mayfind the following difricult to believe, but it is true nevertheless that "Many ofthe economic activities which had come under state control wererepivatiznd.The United Steel Works, which the govemment had purchased from FerdinandFlick in 1932, as well as three of the largest banks in Germany, which had beentaken over during the crisis of 1931, were restored to private oumership at aloss to the govemmenl" (117)

Nazism had other things going for it as well. Although today praising Hitleris likely to have one denounced as a fascist, an anti-Semite, a crank or simplymad, tlis wasn't ahnays the case. In 1936, after the passage of the NurembergLaws, the formerBritish prime ministerLloydGeorye praisedhim as perhaps

118


the greatest man he had ever met, (118) while as late as 1941 he was quoted onHitler thus: none of those men who appear once in a centuqr out of the forcstand can see beyond the well-rubbled field where we and they stand, into thegreen grass beyond." (119) And tlere was nothing wrongwith Uoyd George'sjudgment because he said of Churchill that he had picked him up out ofthepolitical $rtter and wished he had left him there. (120)

Many other statesmen and famous people lavished praise on Hifler; manyalso lavished praise on Stalin. One of these political pilgrims nas the literarygiant George Bernard Shaw.When Shaw travelledto the Soviet Union hethrewa supply ofprovisions out of the train before crossing the border because hewas convincedthere wer.e no shortages in Russia. (121) Of Soviet prisons, Shawsaid tlat prisoners found conditions so pleasing that they were reluctant toleave aftertheyhad served their sentences. (122) Another fellowtravellerurotethattle methods usedin Soviet Russia to rehabilitatermongdoers were sojollyspifhng that "crininals occasionally now apply to be admitted', while yetanother said of a labour camp that "I could never see what kept nen in thiscamp unless theywanted to stay there. No convicts I have lnown would haveany difficulty if they wanted to break away." (123)

Who could believe such nonsense today? Who could have believed it at thetime? (124) Just as socialist Shaw and other left intellectual dupes were soblinded bythe slogans and professed idealism of Soviet egalitarianism andtheworkers' paradise, and just as their successors remain blinded to this day inspite of the masses of inefutable evidence testifying to the real naturc of thesocialist system - evidencewhich even manysocialists do not deny -just as theydid not, do not, will no! can not, see the brutality' degradation' inhumanity,utter ruthlessness, andjust plain inefficiency ofthe socialist system, so toowere, and are, the followers of Adolf Hitler blinded to the reality of NationalSocialism and Fascism.

It has often been said of Mussolini tlat whatever his faults at least he madethe trains run on time. Likewise Hitler did many good things, and only a fool,a socialist or a Zionist stooge would deny the reality of Hifler's achievements.If he had died in 1939 Hitler would undoubtedly have gone down in historA asone of the greatest leaders of all time, perhaps even the greatest leader of alltimer notwithstaniling his govemment's anti-Jewish policy. And if OrganisedJewry had tried to appease him rather than bring Germany to its knees, andif Hitler had continued to develop Germany on autarkical lines, he maywell,

LLg


as A.K. Chesterton claimed, have bestowed the greatest gift upon mankindsince Prometheus stole the fire from Heaven. (125) If, if, if...

Unfortunately we do not live in the world of if; yes, Mussolini did make thetrains run on time, and so did Hifler, but the reader should recall tle wordsof Elmer Pendelh "the Communists...own government machinery [offerslsomething that is better than chaos, and ttrey succeed in convincing theirvictims of thal..they manage to keep a fairly harmonious relationship betweenthe people and the govemmenl..bysuppressingall but onepolitical party, andbymaintaining strict control of the press and other means of communication.Ihe govemment in a Comm u nist country does not reflect the will of the people;rather it directs the will of the people..." (126\ Ditto Nazism and all foms ofFascism.

So let's look at some of the other achievements of Adolf Hitler, the ones hisadmirers either dontt boast about, or rationalise, or explain anray. I don't meanhis anti-Jewish policy, like most people who haven't fallen for the propagandaof the Zionists and their socialist dupes I an sick to death of hearing aboutHitlefs anti-Jewish Pollcy, and about the poor, persecutedo powerless Jews,especially when tle systems tley - the socialists and the Zionists - have createdare many times worse than Nazism. Let's though take a long hard look at theother face of Nazism.

One of the veryfirst things Hitler didwhen he came to powerwas to supprcssthe parliamentary opposition. The pretext used for this was the Reichstag tireof February 27, 1933. Ihe Nazis blamed the Reichstag fire on the Communists;the far lefl naturally, blameil it, and continue to blame i! on the Nazis,although one verywell informed person with no sympathy touards Nazism hasstated categorically that he believed althougF the fire had indeed been startedbya communist, it nas the act of an individual lunatic. (127)

A\eEnabling.lcf of March 23,1933 gave Hitlervirtually dictatorial powers,at least as far as the formulation of policywas concer:ned- Contrary to Zionistand socialist propaganda, Hiflerrs persecution ofthe Jews was far from brutal- certainly in comparison with the Zionist persecution and murder of thePalestinians - and.nas effectedwithin the framework of the rule oflaw, althoughas time passed the anti-Jewish legislation becnme more and more repressive.(128) The courts did not rubber stamp Nazi policy, and frequently decisionsin labour disputes and the like were given in favour of Jews. Acts of violence

120


and other unlawful acts against Jews - 'lndividual acts" - were punished by thecourts, sometimes severely. (129)

On June 30 the following year, Hifler purged the SA' a purge which includedthe murder of Emst Roehm, who, although a homosexual, had been one ofHitlet's staunchest supporters. According to the anti-Nazi propagandist Sef-ton Delmer, the German public approved of the murder of Roehm, while to theoutside world it looked simply like one set of gangsters wiping out another.(130)

Ihe current writer does not shed any tears for the extermination of a fagotlike Roehm, but the point should be taken that if the state, or whoever controlsthe state, can act so capriciously against their former allies, then they can doexacfly tfie same to any of us. Similarly the Nazis' book buming and attackson Jervish and decadent art may meet with general approval amongst whitenationalists, but it would be a strange kind of fool who claimed that no Jewishauthor had ever nritten a book worth reading, or that only Jews and commun-ists had written trash. And it would be an even bigger fool who didn't realisethat the censorship directed by the state at Jews and others can also be dirrcctedat him. Indeed, the Zionists have themselves had cause to regrct the Franken-steints monster they have helped create. In the 1970s and 80s when the far left'snno platform for fascists' had become virhnlly de ig"tezr at British institutionsof higher learning, leftists who associated Zionism with Nazism succeeded insilencing pro-Israel speakers as well as 'T.{azis".

At North London Polytechnic -where a certain htrick llarrington was oncethe victim of a sustained far left hate canpaign - a motion advocating freespeech for both Jews and Arabs was defeated. No platform votes lfor "Zion-ists"] were taken at Essex, Swansea, Bangor, and Dundee Universities, and atMiddlesex, Coventry and Teeside Polytechnics. This was traced to students ofthe FalestinianDiasporaexercisingtheirpolitical clout;while one Polymeetingis even said to have witnessed the absurd spectacle of a member of the rabidly"anti-racist", Jewish-led Socialist Workers' Party quoting at length from theProtocols of Zion! (131)

So too did the Nazis ruthlessly suppress all political opposition, even thoughthe economy under NazismlFascism is far more eflicient than under interna-tional socialism, even though the attacks on individual liberty are nowhere sogreat even though the system is nowhere near as repressive, it is still a ruthlessfom of government and still one to be avoided like the plague.

t2r


Nazi Germanywas a police state, and nobody in his right mindwants to livein a police state. In Nazi Germanyyou ran the risk of ending up in a concen-tration canp not only if you were a political opponent, (132) in particular ag6mmunist, but if you were a Jehovah's Witness, a drunkard, or a socialinadequate (whatever that might be). (l-33) Homosexuals wene also intemed,(134) an4 in practice, anyone the state disapproved of could be inter:ned, andwould be, if Hitler's heirs ever took power in Britain. (135)

Again, at the risk of boring the reade4 we must reiterate that just as I-eninsuppressed all opposition under socialism, so Hitler suppressed the opposi-tion under his r6gime, and not only by the aforementioned.EnablingAct.Hitlerdid not do absolutely anything he uanted, for example, the euthanasia pro-gramme "encountered deep hostility in the German population" and led to anoflicial protest from the Catholic Church. (136) Under the euthanasia pro-gramme the mortally ill were at frrst killed (humanely?), ((t7) later the insanewere added. (138) It doesn't take much of a leap of the imalnnation to see thatunder certain systems of govemment, 'lnsane" could include anyone whorcfused to tow the party line. In our so-called democracy certain categories ofpolitical dissidents are already treated as though they are mentally ill. Ihisincludes Holocaust Revisionists and, racists, (139) and may one day includehomophobes.

Ihe rcader may argue that under Nazism/Fascism, such a prospect isunlikely; if he does, he misses the point. And that point is that once constitu-tional safeguards are thrown out ofthe window, the state, or the clique orindividual n&o control(s) the state, can do whatever they or he like(s).

Althowh a reading of the.Iewish Chronicle for the Nazi era, especially theearly Nazi erao reveals some remarkable surprises, (!-40) it is an inescapablefact that the rule of law rlas increasingly usurped in Germany. (141) Again, thisis inevitable once the power is concentrated in the hands ofthe few, or, as inNazi Germany, the power of the one.

Ilitler became Fiihrer on August 2, 1934, with the death of the aged Paul vonHindenburg.Ihis consolidated his power, and from that moment on, anyonewho stepped the slightest bit out of line had his card marked. Sixty and more]rans on fron Hitler's consolidation ofpower the very concept of dictatorshipis far more terrifying and the principal reason for this is the exponential leapin technologr. Noq with the introduction andworldwide use of inter-connectedcomputers, smart cards and all the associated technolory, the power of a Hifler,

L22

EZT

uespg eql 'slsrJols-rêu lsn"JoloH fuBEJo suoluessu eql ol ftB4uoJ (8tI)'4lnqrsnv lB lueprBrtrrtroJ B uaeq osle p?q JeltrB.rx lrorll?J)tr Jesof 'ueEaf,

Jo luupuBurtro3 lsq eql fq pepeerlJJsls druuc uopu.quecuor alg-,(;.roJJo Islrteql su,ra slql 'Iu!.{L urslaf, eql sun s1epl.ro[uu aqlgo auo 'ppq eJa,n,,sleulrtrFrua\ Jo s1q.r1 ,(ueu '.ru11 pgo11 puotes eqt Jo pue eql rel;ry 'Eupnoqoy eql Eo.IIpaEne8aq uzr slzeNeqf reptrn sassetu eqlJo uolleulJttopqeqtJo fuega aql

'pefseJJ eq eulqJBltr JepJnu usIJRlFo{$Baql sesmxa rou tlm8 puos.red s6JaBTII suassal ,te,tr ou u-r'spugu;.rc Jslee.6ua.ro anan'qa,rasoog ,(1a:g1 a1;nb pue gge.rnq3 tulpls lsqt pBJ arp puy '.fto1qq

u.r sluulrtr.rJc lsalear8 aql Jo euo osIB su { eq gt6l ,(q uaql ',f.ro1s5q uI sJepsal1safaa.6 aqlJo euo selr raIlIH 6€6I ,tq J! :saÎasuaql -ro3 rleads speJ aql puu'tq8pr u a{stn Jaaeu sSuo.ur on1 lng 'slzeN aql uuql sa.4po4e as.ro,r,(1quqo.rdssappo4e papFrrtror pus saFlunot lB4neu pep" u! osIB se![V eqf JBI\ plrol[puoJes aq1 3u.unp ;eq1 ',tpra.r.ror'1no;ugod slsfolodu s.JenlH',tc11od dproJ;sguogsuudxa 'a,qssa.rfflu qq o1 p.re8a.r qlpr {JeE aq1 paddalsra,ro eq $rBlqnop ou eq usc ereqf (1p1) 'p1.ron aql .ranbuoo o1 petuea erl lBrll su.rup pmsqseql paquq pue aFopqr 'upuuEedo.rd 'saq se ssJuslp uur euo {8noqryu puu'ruug eql .rog pue (9tI) '[ssnlqesug aq1] e;.4snyJo nuolsuaur,, slq JoJ ua,rflroleq uE aq q8noqqe !,tr;1od ufta.rog sgapgl,{lptlflrt aquexa osIB 1snlr etrO

(971) ,'uspnururoJ lsqeEu epssnm;zep aqlyo gedss Janlg rtro.r; sJepJo ssardxe uo uilpuepun,{.r;1od e1uraq11ep B ueeq e Bq olsuees rnsgo.r.raf Jo ufteduec qql lroddns 1utlfuuuJ ItuJ u! pue tps"lsnqlueo1u;-'aufe.r snoJaprnu s.u{sls .ro3 aldoed uBIssnU aq1go,(1go[eu fsua eql,(q 11ey pa4uq pu" reeJ aql pau.ro;sue.r1 ,{aql sqfuou aeJ B u.r lsrtrf lreJ eql tuo.gpa8pnf aq uur It6I ul Blssn1 paralua.{aq1uaq,n sdoo.q uum.reg erlf Jo pnpuoteqJ.,, l"ql ,(1a,rgqrq alora a1ee1 luereglp.{1a.rgua se/n $eg eqf q rrolseau!aql Inq (p1) ',{.ro1s;q u.r uopednero pes!1; p lsou eqf sdeq.rad sB,$ aJuaUJouopudnmo slzsN eqf,'saluenbasuot IBTBJ W!11'elssrry )psflu ol - uqq eroJequoe1odetr1q{ - peplrap relryH !eu; do.rlueqq51-ôtoptr J aq16ugd;s regry(gp1) ',ft1sacue qs!ftaf srtrIIBfS peJerf eÊq ol paut.ulc slzep aql ten eqf u! refslpaepq pue'u.6po qsF$ef Jo aq ol peêlJeq,(Fppt{ seaJlesurq qplg 'aup aq1lv'ulssnu pello4uor-qspref (.{pesoddns) 1o oqtuoq p8eq qlsls q|;n ped uped;s .rap1g 's,na1'aq1 1e SulIlBr slq ge .rog 'Eqpap alqnop pue,tmalslsuocu-r',(strcod,(q rraro jslz"N aqt puu s.JagIH qfoq aôqu arll il" of ppe lsntn ano

(Af) ,{flpe.r Eup$;rra1 s artrofirq suq se ll rno Jopadsu,{.ra,raefeltfp pus lo4uot o1 6.rapea1 us;.rsilIelol Jo uu1rul.rJollfne,(uBro

av{snvrcos uScNn noG3SHl

nzT

efgud aql $uIE8" ,(upnu - rarq4d aq1 qlpa Eqae.GesJpol eraql uo{t fI sl rBJ ,noII '1qEF s,tarlu s! rarq4d aql :sseH qdlopnX yosproa eql IIErar 6q1eap,(q alquqspnd Eulaq.gted aq1 3sup8e,{urrnu o1 sy .acanefglra eqf Jo trollsuluue1xe eq1 .rog,(gs1ou pu" pnol 'Euo1 os pedJudwec a,ruqaldoad esaqf uosaal a$ eq ga,rl,(eu qr$[&t 'aseaslp ,trq;pareq we se tuslmtp.re8a.r oqn 6uoJsens.rad 1spya1 sJo qaq1e's,tuparou eldoad atuos iu" ore'rr.

(fSf) 'qtuap,(qalquqsJund sar,$.ru; eql Jo uouesrueEro ue .ro ,tlproqpe ,$.ru4 pu-ru8e ltq1nu:,(puerg;d.rs 1sou luy (gg1)

"1uaqea4 Emofuapun uos.rad aq;;o uogsqurad

erp lnoqtla' aldoad asoql ez.q.uafs o; .ra,nod seq luaurrJeaog eqL :essaslp.&rugparaq a Bq oq { ewor ol suoganaua8 go uopeep.rd eql roJ ,r€I g€6I .tI,{1nf aqf repufl 'argns il}n IBp11 raslefl eqf uo.{ sapnb go eldnoc rerpouy

ia 7 dnuy4 dnlaapo ?7 slqg ldaruocrarqld slr$ s-r .{qog .ragn leq&\ areqtouu Jo lurTf ol rurr sq lrefqns ,(t6qruruos.radEuqu.rql 1q8lr,(uu saoq ls8qql 1soru fnoqu Suo.r,nuaaq s"q pu.DlrruuJo lsou I"FoEaEuI eug eJu.rs uaq,r bspuaqlo Jo Isrp11od .ra11eu .{.ra,rapoqu [email protected] aq s,tu,qe uec srapealgo dno.6,tuu.ro.rapea1,{uu pq1 aaaqaq.tperauo{uu saop 'apgse 1eq1 8u.r,rea1 1nq 'sp.roll u,no s.sseH ol ell aql sa,rp puupocgof f€1g alpq lnq JIoJaq luanbasqns sg1 .sapnb qrns Jaqlo,tuurn a.re anary(ZST)

"'us11epos leuopsNJo roqrrrupeqs aqt seg puurrntror sIttrJo lno Eu]Crrecfp11alq eqt q 'eroJeraqa 3o uopsanb eqf eslu.r lou seop qrg/n puertrttrotsFI ol aoue[Deqo IsJpgrun eql u! lqt;r aq 11ur s(enp eq 1uql pue fq8prs,{urqu q aq luqt arou{ prre IaeJ I1e e,s luqf lJuJ eqf Eo{ ses!.rs leql pue t rarqgge$ sI lEqL'rusr.rll;.r eaoqu rsJ uerrrrag euo s! anaql 1uq1 {es a,r apprd q;p1":snql ssnll qdlopng papnb eqlxaN (ISI) ,'rapJo eql 1no Sur,tr.reo uos.rd aq1Jo 1.rd aql uo lmJt pus eruemeqo qrndu! :s8uJq; or$ papuuuep EslIElroSIsuollBI\L lEql prJ?s lasunoS s.rauarx 6eaua;ep aq1.roJ qcaads Equado qq u1

(0sr) 'seeeld u1 palplds almb sararuaJep aql pue (6tI) .ppr; noqs B lou sBra IB!{f,

erusnv|cos u3cNn ytoc=t3ul

9Zr

qs$Ftr erear sreqtuou rapunoJ sl! Jo fuutu 'uogalsaq3 'X'V eW 'qEnoq1e':peqru.rp snolras euo aaeq q8noql p;p lI 'rglea/$uormrroJ eql Jo sJeqrmuel$ltr aql $!r{ srtu{ Euo.rp qqquu ol pue 'a.raq,(puaqu saflqlr-uou esoqlep;.qede.r o1 6u;u1ug o1q sallq r-uouJo xnlJu! eqf lsquEu padpdursr 11 :elFlnul"llr{ ileaq ol fg.ruu1.rd papunol sa r tuo.U IEuoIIBN arll 'sruflI ppoll qloqug 1qEno; oqlr 1s1leuolluu pu" lolrlud tuaf e 6uogalsaq3 1y'y,{q papunoy sunlI 'ului4rg q peu.roJ se,ra luo.U IBuollBN aql pallsr,qrud papJloil e'Lg6lul

IB^I^rnS efFl&Irod alEEnrls eql puv'fuo.14 IBUoIIBN eqtrJg,tpe8u.trf, eql

'luu trc argl no,t qsnJt lllia aq-luqys.ra,uod aq1 '.{11qft1s ueaeJosaao.rdduslp efqs aql 1uq1fen.{uu ur,{1puuos.rad.rno,( ssandxe no,{ se uoos setselo.rd pepu 11aqp'auo a:1uu no,t sa uoos se 6aug,tged aqlgo ap;qno dalseuo a{sl no,( se uoos ss fnff 'eug 'anbpr Eu1p.r aql ,(q pesnodsa,trgod .raq1o,(ue.ro 'apgd puo;1uu 'leapr.rns a;rq,r'scpeEne esJoplle no,(g o5 !'elsls eqt6upEe auou 'a3e6 aql u1q1!,n 11V. ue6o1s aq1 uJ dn peuuns aq ust usltsBd/Es!-Islros IBuogEN Jo looru eqt 'ule8v 'alBI oot q ll ISun altloed 1som ot snopqol.usg11lnq6snopqo eqpForls sFItr'uurtrrtollal s.auo sp.ranrol,tpuaeap8u;.ruqaq;o 3dacuoa ,{.ruu1p.ro eql rtro.r; ,{u,n Euol e sg ,t1np Jo sap! $! Scefiot sFlL

'at8J Jo/puB elEls eql ol,{lnp q lI Espultos IBuoIl"N tapan lua4tou eql o1,{1np s! l! tnsll"loos repun'sue1s,(s uslrerllslol pue uslrslFoqtne IIBJo padde pdJcuprd aq1sg 1eq;'6u1-Buopqlo asuas s1q1 'uope1uau18ar sgql',,,{4pn1cund. qq1 qtnoqt slll',{fUent-aund uuql ag1 u.r sEqql 1uq.rodu1 erortr aJE eJeln lsqt mpseJ aqf etrrlalrotpFoqs seJBIdalqa.r;sapunJarllo puszlpNltsnyof ueJsu!?.qesoqf Joartros essJJa$BI eql q lsql lrsJ eq1 !aru;1 uo unJ suru4 aql epsu sFpN eqt ptrB sfspsedtrElsll aq1 'uaes aaeq e,ln sV ee;1 rusltsuJ go peddu eql seop treql eJeql\

ruslrsBf,Jo lueddvaql

efUSnV|cOS U:lONn IIIOOS3HI

9Zr

Julnrp:ed u-r 's.raquau 1uo.rg Eu1pua1;o sluapecoluB IUBN aql uo pazles sJe{BrII-Jer-qJsIu lsJuo-rzAslnaf palossB pue s.raSuoua;Eq lsllBftosJo luo.rg.repdodeql lnq (691) 's.raquau qspaaf lorue ol qdualp rlpouseds epuu peepu!puu (6SI) .dgqs.raquau sgls8uoruurer! 8pelseoq$o4geql0r6l seelel sV

',tged aq1 .ra,ro atuengu.r 8upuanru.r uupegaxa'ralsqal\ wuutr4l lulxasouoq aql SuJpnpul luauap pulq at11 1ulll ltuJeql Sqpuepqlpafotr leql pu" .a.rn1onr1s Jpernuep,tpSnoloql B pBIl luo.qilIEuopEN aql 6anou.raql.rng'po8 1eq1.roy dpduur o1.ro os,(us o1pleqe pu s""npue lu^!i"ms al$pr u! pe e{aq,{du1s eH :re eleqia -Ilrre Jo uqsy-guu trelq-puu su?eru auo pJoA{ snonrB^ larn,tq {l $tmr B uolalsaq3 s8 r JeqlleN

',tlneg pespu8 rO',{qqol IsJP11od eps.rcse;'.tsunb ssalqlru,(1p1o1pue pg.ranod fstllJo sus-rqqJt efeup$al qBE ol pr-arys Jeaau ssrr eqq8noqlp'1uo.{{ IeuopsN eqt papunoJ aq a.ro;aq EuoI usplues-gus petunoller,{praauls p"q (ggl) 'pasropua aq selJoaql ,(ee.qdsuoe re^efeqlr puu s rep.re,n-and sFI Jeaelsq,ra'uo1ra1saq3 luql Ja eoquqar lqnop ou eq ust eJe'rr.

',(up luasard aql of u,taop 996I ul asaarl plourvJo rpsap aqf etuls Ppq s"qeq apuloJte ue 6pe1i Eqpeal s,ule1.rr{ auoreq ol uo luea lreprof UIIoJ GgI)',(grepuuoldgp 11 lnd.raqrreaser auo se 'uogsan$ qspref aql uo

"actre8.rstrequlr.ro; uopuquefuo sgg uo.g usprof u!Io3 ulegar u papadxa aq tS6I uI pue's3s1p,{o1 andug yo an8erl aql Jo JapunoJ eql osp sula uo1.r4seq3 'X'V

' uspluas-puy tg,tpaBn4 atlJ pellr,r \ooq 3 elgra ol qrlatJql qdasol'.re1pnqslaef xopor$Jg aW qf.r,$ dn paweal eq 8t6I u! pus 'uaes peq aq lq8noql .ro',nus eq leqniQ pag;.r.roq suar eq 6pnrro1o11 aql puu sdust uose4uatuot eql

lnoqe epue8eito.rd paq1y,{q q uaqq tam aql relry'slzuN aql Suuq8g lnoqesulunb ou peq uogepaqJ $lg1) ,,ssaulsnq s.u!q!rg pqu* ol paluar,{e1so141a1.nl,lt GgI) 'ailrnas-guu fuellu.ra B oslu surd. uoilelsaq3 6,(a1so141 a4rp11 ',ta1so141

q1.r,n lgtts .rap1 lnq .raqde.6og sla1soy41 osp sura aq '4n1st1m7g eql.radedstrau

f,nf, arpJo roflpa eql sera uogefsaqJ lsgeu:nof',tgapq lnq 6araq uoga;saq3

T'yJo.{qdafo.rq e gu.rad lou saop aredS 'uopes1mfuO lqEllprses aq1 dnar1eu leql srellaas4 raogal doSpue s,na1'-o1d,irc pa[g-elsqJo enbga leus ;eq1.repag.red u.r Supnpul 'ga1 Ssltot-grlre! pallslos aqf ,(q Eql Jo ap"u sI qJnupuu ls;csug JarrrJoJ E sear JIasuIq uolafseqJ ?uernele $r-ua4xe .ro aEu.u;Jguunl 11artrs u pe.4lu of lou uope-'f,1uur lsqe8e padpduuc qtlq r uoll"s-;uufrro .ro ,tped,tue .roy elqu4atuoJtrr aq plnoir lI ryaleedxa aq of sera sFLlr

'sIzBN (.reurog-os-1ou aruos puu) .rau.rol;o anb.tle 3 peululuotoqu 1g lno :ad;alo; aql daa:1 o1 .t 4unor qql .ro1 1q6noJ peq oq,tr ueruetlaras'xa

av\lstlvrcos ulcNn v{oo3lHJ

LZI

,(1a.rpua eq louueJ luo4g eql 'up8g 'eJoJ aql o1 ,(Jp1du auua 6uogalsaq3

.(q qceqe q pleq uaeq peq qtr,qar luo.\iJ eql Jo Eslllues'$ue 1uo1e1 ,(peerlueq,I (?9I) 'dpduur 1uo.rg-puu algo.rd qftq s,an8ra-1-tzep-$uy aql uo{ seqes-ueql af,uslslp ol asoqt,taql suosuar Jeqlo puB lutllt"l.rog q6noql1e'qq8.upc.q.r1od apup.rHal slg luo.rg aq1 ,{uap o1 dpduec elg Jo luo{eroJ eql u.r area,Cu{ef lsJuol2 paquufug Jo sreltraqrs u"me elqouni eq;, 'us$Iues'Puu sua

farue1q,{gelgud aq,tpo ueJ llro.\[ eql tplq,rr roJ euo pue rualqo.rd .reqloug(991)'slstrcot

pue slslrseJ paflat-os Jo sffi;.r aql aquSocar .ra8uol ou ppo,n l! 3eltrf sepJeqn

II IJ roJ IIrunoS lBtrolluN eql,(q uolfsrslrap aqf sarl qSnoE 4psu eEp'I[eaq1,t1qeqo.r6 lI dop o18qq1ou pyp,(1p.raua8 1q3lr ruJ eql pue ftro.U 1euopuNaq1 aE rq puu ,tq pue 'ursrtot lo aluuortr pe;q1,tu eqt luqruot ol JapJo tr! aBI Joap.r aq1 q8noJql erpe/$s B lnc ol ale,r{ slts eJaJ areu o lL 'eruot 01 serr asroi[ JBJ'saqr.ruu pue stqlaau ploq of IqBIJ sr.[N eqlJo uolssa.rddns eqf sG$ ss p"{

'aueH

eql {oof lBrtrf tuo.u aql sar I s,(e,rqe puu 'pasodu-r a.Ieia susq le{uElg 'JapJosJp

c;gnd Jo perql aql ,(q ,fiilu1s &FptB lslptrogeu aggs ol lJel rrf,ltorplrB!paususlrtr eql pa aolle dN aql snryuopdnrslp roJ ,fialepauq papfue1ara,$ qrlqa s8upeau cgqnd algo.rd q8g pue serpJcrtr (acunouue uqJo arortr.ro) ploq q tu.rnupuoc,tq lnq'rgqnd q pe eqeq 11a,lr pue {6rap.ro lrud lsoueql JoJ era r oqm 's.raquarn u,rto sg ttrl!,$ loN 'uopeltro.{uoc 1ueloll Eu.Garnocua

Jo daq eqt olq I1aJ luo.U 1euopeN aq1 'slrnor aq1 q8no.rql seFlreue sfl8upq8g

Jo pselsuJ'(g16l ul pafp uogelsaq3 a:y) ',{ged aql peal ol ues.rr peq ppu,fi,uqof eup sgl ,(g ?aresroa elrals,tq aq1 passa.ford selfraaos eq sy 'paquu8

-Jo eJe { slsa1o.rd-.ra1unot lualo!^ 'qLrutu u aslueEro ol paFl tuo.tr{ luuo.Il-EN ern eu$,tuy'sIzBN lsquEy stog uerc 'slzeN lsuFEV spltllooqrs 'speN

fsqe8y sJaqJeqtr Inq (991) antuq IzsN-puV eqt,(po;ou puq an uoos,f,ral'uollcugxe uls1.roJ - ilH st1oo1 erup luasard

eql lE lurtr a - rro{I atar eryq,lt eql aaes of pIrB eqq,n upllrg deerl o1 pad;eduerpq1 uo;1uquu8.ro ,(ue lsup8s Inq luo.lil aq1 ,(1uo lou lsup8u pelunou surad.reduue - pcgapr(q saug luJ! - IsJlpoq1atu u puu'paqguerm eJer IIIJoJIUn

.rzBN u!,t1p;radse ppu,fi uqof Jo sqde$oloq; (191) 's1offletn se saitf olpepnIIB JEsqail\ puu 11upu,fi {foq qqq,rr uI sapxls,{pra aql uo.g dn 8np aransalonb Sugssu.r.requa'sauppeaq eql olq f,uia sll {tp[ of p;us su,$ dN eqtr

'ftrorJ aq1 lsup8e uEpduee.rraus snolJIA B peqtlmq'sserdeql u1 spmFJ rleql qlp$ Uatuot u.r (puu 'relsqeXl u$rsnt pue ppu,(tr uqol

cYlSl-lVlCOS UscNn WOCS3UI

FHEEDOM UNDER SOCIALISM?

blamed for this; it is not simply a case of giving a dog a bad name, the fact isthat it is often the activities of certain Jewish (more often Zionist) organisa-tions and individuals that are the root cause of anti-Semitism as much as thecrazies and the outright bigoterl.

The net result of all this has been the associating of any form of n&ite racialconsciousness in Britain with a particularly bizame fom of sex shop Nazism,and six million uterninated Jews. We have already covered this ground in amore general sense; this is of course a pattern that has been rrepeated the lengthand breadth of the white world, what remains of it. The driving force behindthe Anti-Nazi Letgue (henceforth ANAL) was not Organised Zionist Jewry butthe Socialist Workers Party, which in spite of its pathological opposition toZionism (165) has never been shy about soliciting funds from Jewish business-men to combat (ostensibly) the mutual enemy.

It is theworlds worst kept secret that the SocialistWorkers PartyanilANALare the same organisation in all but name; (16O from the latterrs inceptionmany ANAL oflice holders wene prominent members of the SWP; many stillare at tle time of uriting. (167) When they cry racism, racism, racisn thepopular front puts forviard its own solutionz socialism, socialism, socialism.this pattem is repeated tlroughout the white world, what is left of iL In theUniterl States, one of the leading nanti-racist" organisations is the so-calledCenter for Democratic Renewal. This started life as the National Anti-KlanNetworlg (168) its so-called Research Director is a man named LeonardZeskindo who is a former organiser of the Marxist-Ieninist Sojourner thuthOrganization. (169) Zeskind is the US conespondent for the Jewish-ormed,anti-white race-hate magazine'Searchlightrand, for the record, hewas presentwith that organisation's head honcho, Gerrry Gable, and another Jew, StephenSilver, when the current rvriter served a libel writ on Gable at the House ofCommons on Wednesday, December 8, 1993. (170)

In Fbance, one of the leading "anti-raclsf" organisations, MRAf, tle so-called"Moyement Against Racism and for Amity 4rnong Peoples', is a ComnunistParty Flont. (171) Another "anti-racist" organisation, SOS Racisme, has beenpartly funded by that country's socialist government. (L72)

There is though nothing new under the sun. The reader should recall thewords ofLothrop Stoddard from 1,920: "in every quarter ofthe globe, in Asia,Africa, Latin America, and the United States, Bolshevik agitators whisper in

r28


the ears ofdiscontented colored men their gospel ofhatred and revenge. Everynationalist aspiration...", etc. (173)

It goes without saying that such "nationalist aspirations" exclude any formof w,hite racial nationalism, save thenationalism of the IRA and other bandsof murdering Marxist thugs.

It would be pointless here to itemise all the trials and Fibulations theNational flont and other white racial organisations were to face over thecoming years. For these and for other reasons the Fhont eventually collapsed.In 1980, John lindall split and formed tle New National trbont, which uas laterto become the British National hrty. The reason ljmdatl left the Flont,ostensibly, was because he had discoyered a honosexual network operating inits upper echelons. This network appears to have consisted primarily if notentirely, of Martin Webster and his homosexual lover Michael Salt, althoughfyndall did at a later date publish evidence tlat Webster had trieil it on withat least one yo'rng National Front member. (174) Webster notwithstanding, themajor reason for Tlndall's delmrture appears to have been the rrfusal of theflont's Directorate to give him dictatorial po\flers. But then Tlndall is adeilicaterl Nazi.

In 1986, whatuas left of the Fhont split into three factions, one calling itselfthe Intemational Third Position, another calling itself the National Fbontproperandyet another callingitselfthe ThirdWay. Third Position sounds likesome sort of bizane sexual practice, as to the ThirdWay - pssningathirdrraybetween capitalisn and communism - this is nonsensel there is no ThirdlT'ay.In the words ofAyn Rand, in a compromise between the good and the bad, thebarl aluays wins. (17O

In spite of the demise of the National Flont, both the far left and OrganisedJewry continue to uail and whine about the Nazi menace. Notwithstanding thefact that the National flont never was a Nazi party, and that the diminutiveBNP under the leadership of the dedicated Nazi John llnilall is going norrhere- Millwall or no Milhvall (176) - the anti-white hate propaganda of the socialistcontrolled popular front will continue to grow as will the tyranny of thesocialisVcollectivist race industry.

All this can, does and will cause enormous resentnent amongst the dwind-ling white population, and will unrloubterlly lead to those who have not beentotally indoctrinated with the enemies'poison to seeking railical solutions tothe problem ofwhite surrival. It is here that the appeal offascism is strongest

129


of all. Socialist, Zionist and other hate propaganda has a simple message:either you ane an "anti-racist" (and committed to racial suicide) or you are aracist, read, six million acterminated Jews and gas chambers for everyone elsewhose skin isn'twhite.

Ihis propaganda has been drummed into the heads of our people, and, mostsickeningly, into those of our children, so intensely anil for so Iong that it hasbecome the prrcvailing wisdom. There are signs tlough that the hate campaignagainst Westem Man has gone too far, primarily in the revolt against politicalcorrectness. Ihe organised homosexual movement may have had somethingto rlo with this. While many people have been easily duped by socialist propa-ganda masqueradingas nanti-racism"

rthevast majority, especiallyparents andincluding non-whites, are not so gullible or so brainuashed that they can beduped into equating the mythical disease of homophobra with the Nazi garchamberq this sort of indoctrination is purely for mattoiils. (177)

Orthodox Jews and devout Muslims - to name but two groups - have toldtleworld in no uncertain terns that theywill have none of it.When in 1993 theChief Rabbi Emeritus, Lord Jakobowits, ruled that genetic engineering mightbe used to eliminate the poison of homosexuality from society forever, he uasdenounced as an advocate ofNazi race science. (178)

Which brings us to the elimination of miscegenation, the prime concern forNational Socialists and their fellow travellers. Indeed this is the only realconcern for most of them because, socialist indoctrination aside, apart fromthe natural preference we all have for our own kind, it is only the fear of a blackplanet and of racial death tlat bothers most white people, and, I would sugestmost people of all races.

Ihe National Socialist movement worldwide - so far as it exists, so far as ithas any structure or credibility at all - has as its primary goal that of effec{inga total physical separation and segregation ofthe races, at least ofthewhiterace, from all others. Ihis is not an exclusively National Socialist goal' manyreligions have broadly similar goals, though by and large the spokesmen forall the world's great religions stress that they recopise no bar or colour, creedor raoe. This latter is true especially of Christianity and Islam, and of theJervish religion. Even the Zionist fanatic Rabbi Meir Kahane insisted that hewould recognise any Arab as a Jew provided the man had converted accordingto the proper formula. (179)

130


Be that as it may, the goal of total separation is totally impractical, and, inthe current nrriter's opinion, undesirable. That being said, there is an enor-mous gulf between cultural eclecticism and racial death. It should be stressedherethatitis farfrom onlythe socialists andtheirimmediatefellowtravellerswho have it in for the rryhite race - and, in the longer term - for the rest ofmankind. Atheist philosopher and author of many skeptical books Paul Kurtzfalls into this category; Kurtz is a humanist, and in 1991 laid his cards on thetable for all the world to see: *The highest good, as I see it, is intermarriagebetween people of difrerent ethnicities, races, religions, and culturcs. Peoplewho intermarrT are contributing to the new human species that is emerging ontlis planeL You can see it clearly in the United States: in fifty years we will havea non-ryhite nqiority. This frightens many people. I can see the same changesin the cities of Wmtem Europe...In due course, the majority may no longer beTvhit€. I rhink this is wholesome and good. It is diffrcult for many people'snervous systen to have this clash of cultures and races, but we owht toencourage the widespread intermingling of people as we reach a civilisationwhich is beyond ethnic differences."

Ihis insidious piece of poison, which appeared in the magazine New Hu-manist, bore tle almost unbelievable title The Limits of Tblerance. (1E0) Theprevious year the same magazine had published an article which argued thatthe natural and healthy disgust and revulsion the ovenn&elming majority ofpeople ofall races feel for homosexuals and their depraved practices was anillness that had to be cured. (181)

Incidentally, Paul Kurtz was at Dachau with the American army during theliberation. In a personal communication he told the currentwriter thathe hadseen first handthe evidence of Nazi genocide - although hewas cageyaboutnotssati6ning the non-existent gas chamber. Hewent on to publish an Americanedition of the bogus memoirs of Rudolph Hoess, Commandant Of AuschwiE.Kurtz is of course aware of Holocaust Revisionism, but the skepticism hedisplays tovard any manifestation of the paranormal is nowhere manifestedin his appraisal of this most tragic period of human history though havingwritten the words above, this is hardly surprising; he has a vested interest inthe promulgation of such lies.

This is the sort of fitth and genocidal poison that those dedicated to whitesurival face, and indeed" they are not alone. As a lifelong atheist I will notpretend to hold organised religion - or any religion - in anything but contenpt.

131

-

\i

\


But the hatred (especiatty) tle humanists espouse for religion should at thevery least lead one to question tfeir motives. Like the socialists they have anagenda, anil they are intent on imposing that agenda on the rest of mankinddisguisedas thesolutiontoaproblen.Forthesocialists this problem isracismlPaul Kurtz has stated in no uncertain tems what he sees as the solution tothatproblem.

llow then should those dedicated to white - and other - sulvival, (182) fightthis poison if not by embracing National Socialism or some related racialphilosophy? Ihe correct way to do this, indeed, the onlyway, is on the basis ofindividual rigbts.

{

132


Chapter Thirteen: The Fight AgainstSocialism, National Suicide AndRacial Death: The Way Forward

Up until fairly recently in its history certain Southern States of the USenforced anti-miscegenation laws. (1) The abolition of anti-miscegenation lawswas seen as a great triumph by the Socialist Intemational and their fellorvtravellers, not because anti-miscegenation laws are any sort of insult to man-kind, (2) but because by abolishing them the leftists are not simply abotishingdiscimination bnt are taken one step closer to abolishing tlat most hated ofinstitutions, the nhite race.

Naturally, National Socialists and others would like to see not just thereinstatement of anti-miscegenation laws but the death penalty for those whopractice it anil indeed for those who promote it. Many people - of all races -feel uactly the same rvay about hard drugs, and indeed, some countries,Malaysia for example, actually execute major drug smugglers. Such policiesare based on the nistaken notion fhat just because something is bado not onlyougbtn't people to do it, but that they should be prohibited by law from doingso. Ihis is not opposition to socialism, rather it is a different kind of socialism.

As stated, the cor:rectwayto conbatmiscegenation and other sym.ptoms ofthe multi-racial madness is through the restoration of individual rights andthe scaling doum of state intervention and meddling in all aspects of people'spersonal and economic lives. To this end white racists should forn allianceswith Black Separatists and like-minded racial nationalists. But they shouldnof support any form of state coercion.

Ihe race industry the world over is fundeil largely by public money, thatmeans taxpayers' and ratepayers' noney. In other words, your money. Withoutstate sponsorship, this poison would long since have dried up, as would thegay "rights" lobby and most of the other socialist-inspired crypto-ideologies.National Socialists and others must lear:r to accept the reality, that somemembers of the white race will fall by the nayside, and concentrate on tlosewho can be saved.

133


The uay fonvard is a long and tortuous road, but a good starting point wouldbe the restoration of the rule of law by Iobbying and byjudicious appricationof the civil law. \ilherc once racial discrimination was enshrined in raw, nowalfirmative action (or whatever name it goes under) is likewise enshrined. Inother words, racial discrimination. The enforcement of nno plaforms forfascists" and othernonsensehas been usedto emasculate all resistance.Awhileago the current uniter was told by the British National Party's prcss officerthat planning law in this country now stipulates that those q'ho apply forplanning permissiol have "a duty to promote good relationsn rhose werc hisactual words.

Obviouslysuch semantic drivel can and does mean anything the self*tylednanti-racist'bareaucnacy[ants it to mean, and can be used not onlytosuppressall dissent and as a means of censorship, but to promote national sniciile andracial death. rhe sad fact is that many such seemingly innocuous policies andand laws which are used ostensibly for the public benefit arc used, in the frrstinstance, to destroy the rights of 'npopular groups such as the BNB and thenceto destroy the rights of all and sundry.

Those who would wish to see an end to this poison should aim to rcstoremost of all the right of the individual to associate or not to associate withutomhe or she wishes, and the right of the taxpayer and ratepayer not to betyrannised by little totskies using their own money. In shor! no taxationwithout representation.

Like I said, this will be no easy task because not only are these people totallyruthless, but because there arc many agendas at work here, from OrganisedZionist Jewry at one end to the organised homosexual movement at the other.Often these groups are at loggerheads with one another, but they all agree thatfascists (3) should be banned, or even stamped out. In practice, anyone whodoesn't endorse forced race-mixing wholeheartedly becomes not only aracistbut a fascist in their eyes. As does anyone who raises objections to any oftheirother agendas. Some members of far right parties adopt the attitude tlat "Ourenemies will call us Nazis whateverwe do, therefore we might as well be Nazis.nThe only thing one can say in response to this sort oflogic is that it is not veryintelligenL

I will not touch on the question here as to whether or not tle r+fiite race orany other race deserves to survive. I will say simply that I believe it d.oes, and

134


that the members of every race and culture have the right - or even the duty -to preserve their inheritance for posterity, and let it go at that.

One leading Libertarian - whom I will not name for the obvious reason - toldme that he personallyfinds blacks physically repulsive but that he doesn't carcif whites and anyone else practise miscegenation. My views are diametricallyopposed to his; there are many people I find physically repulsive - includingpractisingmiscegenists, peoplewith facial tattoos, peoplewho don'twashrand,most of all, homosexuals. Blacks - or persons of other races - do not enter fallinto my category ofpersonal dislikes, but personal likes and dislikes are notthe same as ideologr, and tr accept, and so should you, that people may findother people repulsive or hateful ' including you! - for no better reason thanthat tley exist.

Notwithstanding that people can be indoctrinated and that therrc are ac-quired tastes, and so on, finding someone - or some gpoup (4) - physicallyrepulsive may be sad but is nomorewrong than linding sone object repulsive,because this sort of thing is largely a subjective judgmenl One mightJust aswell argue that it is wrong to find the taste of strawbemies repulsive. I haveoften heard it said that many homosexuals find the thought of normal sexrepulsive, and that many lesbians find the thought of men touching themrepulsive. (5) In the frnal analysis, no one has the right to demanil thathomosexuals should not n'allow in their perversion any more than "anti-racists"have the right to demand that certain whites should not lind blacks physicallyrepulsive. In a truly free - ie non-socialist - society, both racists (6) andhomosexuals would have the inalienable right not only to indulge in their pethates and perversions, but to attempt to win converts. (7) But they would nothavetheright to do so using public money. (8)

Retuning now to the main subject matter of this chapter, the proposedstrategr for combating socialism (ie the restoration of indivirlual rights), thisis also the corr.ect strategr for opposing quasi-socialist mendacity in everyother field of human activi$ besides the race indusfi. The increasingll'interventionist style of government throughout the West has not only erodedfreedom but destroyed prosperity, or even the prospect of prosperity, forcountless millions of people.

In Chapter Three we discussed the case of Johnson Conhols, the Americancompany that was dragged into court because it operated a foetal protectionpo[cy. We commented at the time that such state intervention and regulation

135


of private business adds to the costs of producing goods and senices andtlercforc reduces the goods and services available - the real weatth of thesemmunity. We might have added that such state intervention and regulationis repeated throughout the economy, rather than simply in ttre fields of so-called equal opportunities. Thue, this sort ofthing does createjobs for bure-aucrats, but they are not real jobs, and they are detrimental to the economyand society in other ways. To staywith the race indusFy, it is a fact is it not thatmany of the policies that have been implemented under pressure from theseflnants have had negative, and in some cases, disastrous, etfec'ts for racerelations? Evenmanyblacks are now sickto death about thecontinual carpingonaboatracism. Most blacks don't want special privileges anymore than theyvrant to poke their noses in wherrc they are not welcome. The state has no rightto compel companies, and certainly not individuals, to enploy, other.wiseengage or to associate with people they don't want to, regardless of race. (9)

The race industry is the supreme example of socialist-oriented mischief-making, but it is far from the only one. If we are to liberate mankind from theclutcles of this dreadful inhunan philosophy we must destroy the power baseof intemational socialism totally and utterly. First and foremost fhis meansdestroying its economic porver base. We must work for the repeal of alllegislation whiei puts public money into the pockets of anti-business andanti-free ente4lrise pressure groups, be they the race industrry, the AIDSindustry, (10) the anti-smoking indust4i, or any of the plethora of Quangoes -most of them created, ironically, by our so-called Conservative Government -rvhose thinly disguiseilraison d'€tre is to expand their own empires bypassingand enforcing mone and more repressive and restrictive legistation at ourexpense.

The destruction of the actual repressive legislation which these monstershave enforced on society bythe time honoured technique of lyingthrough theirteeth (11) will be, if anything an even stiffer tasli. I have suggested tlatjudicious application of the civil law might be one v,:ay ahead. This could be aparticularly etficacious method of tackling the race indusfi. lf racismrvhat-ever is meant by that totally vacuous epithet, is such a terrible evil, thenperhaps those accused of fostering it shoulil issue a few libel units. Or maybethey should start throwing them around like confetti? In the united States,which has constitutional guarantees ofsuch things as freedom ofspeech, thetobacco industry has decided that it has finallyhad enough, and has launched

136


Iaw suits ngainst the Clinton Administration's attempts to destroyitundertheguise ofprotecting the young. (12)

The strugle against socialism is, in the first instance, an ideologicalstruggle, but no ideological struggle was ever won without a frght, and oftentle spilling of blood. In the words of lhomas Jefferson: "Ihe tree of libertymust be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and t5rants.'(13) For, in the final analysis, socialism is an evil, totalitarian philosophy; ithas often been said that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for goodmen to do nothing, unfortunately, the triumph of socialism - unlike the triumphof fascisrn - has been made possible not by the apathy of good men but by theiractive participation. To illustrate this point I woultl like to end this studywitha personal reminiscence.

Epilogus TomCaldwell

Ibm Caldwell was found dead in his home on Christuas Eve, 1994, attheyoungage offrfty. His deathcame as a shockboth tomyselfandto manypeoplerdo had lqonar him, becauss alfftsrrgh he had been desperately ill up untilquite recently, all his friends andcolleagues believedhewas oyer theworst ofiL Certainly he had put on weight - thanks largely to steroid treafnent - andalthough he had long quit his post in the voluntary sector in Lewisham, he uasstill beavering away on a number of projects.

Itho was Tbm Caldwell? As I said, he was a voluntany sectorworke6 I firstmet him, around the Summer of 1987 - dates are not my strong point - and hewas yery helpful to me at a time in my life when I needed help. He was Yeryhelpful to a lot of other people too, including those who didn't deserve any helpat all. Tomworked at a centre for the unemployed; Lewisham has a high rateof unemplo5mentrandthe centre did,and continues to do, sterlingwork Ithasto be said though tlat some people are not simply unemployed but virtuallyunemployable, as is the character I am now about to introduce. At one time thecenht nhere Tom worked was plagued by a series ofthefts. It was even burgledat one poinl liom knew who was responsible for most of the thieving and oneday, aftcr a portable IV set had gone missing, he threw him out"

r37


I thought this guy was gone for good, but a short time later he was backcadgng cigarrcttes and the like offTom. I asked Tbm why he kept letting himin and he replied simply that there was no curing some people and that onejust had to do one's best for them. I've no doubt that Tom was 1611 lstrding (iegving) this guy money out of his orm pocket, for his bus fare home, knowingfull well that itwould be spent in the pub.

At lbm's funeral early in the New Yea4 literally hundreds of 1rcople from allbackgrounds turned out, including a lot of people I wouldn't invite into myhome - and that's saying something! Ibm was a vera nuch loved aad respectedman, by his co-workers, by the people who used the centre, and by many peoplewho, Iike the petfy thief mentioned above, had been the recipient of his help,his largess, and his humanity over the years.

The point of this belated obituaryis that Tomwas, or considerc{ himsslf febe, a committed socialist and "anti-raclJt". He told me on one occasion that heconsidered fascism to be a dangerous philosophy that needed to be supprcssed.He had also been, at one time, a member of the Socialist Workers Party. (14)He hated all foms of bigofi and the Tory govemnent in equal measure.Unlike most so-called socialists though, there was nothing doctrinaire aboutTom's beliefs. He had read quite a lot of political theory but his political beliefssprung not from Marxism but from a belief in people, that they mattered, andthat human nature uas inhertntly good. Even though he had theoretically givenup full time worko his life revolved around wor\ none of ntich uas for his ownbenefiL He was heavily involved with a music project in a neighbouringborough right up until the end. It is no exaggeration to say that Tom was themost selfless p€rson I have ever me! me and a lot of other people.

The other thing I rcmember about Tom was that he was a strong man. Notphysically, certainly not after suffering for years from the appallipg illnesswhich led to the removal of his spleen, among other things. (15) RecaI thoughthe thief at the centre; Ibm liurerv that these sort of people were weak in t,hespirit and that horvever much kindness or humanity he, or anyone else, showedthem, theywould continue to steal, continue to take advantage.

What Tom didn't realise is that most socialists - certainly those who rise tothe top of the pile - were not motivated by his iilealism. Tom was an altruist;altruism is a belief that it is the highest good to work for otlers. As indeetl itis. But socialists are not altruists. Lenin, Stalin, Thotslcyanil their successorswere motivated neither by altruism nor by idealism. The man who suppressed

138


all opposition (including the socialist opposition); the man who mastermindedthe Tiflis Post Oflice robbery; tle man who ordered the shooting of workers"like ducks in a pond"l the monsters who butchered fourteen tlousand andnorc ollicers and intellectuals at Katyn (and then tried to palm it off on theNazis); the men who engineered the "Cultural Revolutionn, and the 'Killing

Fields", and who ordered Tlananmen Square, were not motivated by love oftheir fellow man, by idealism, or by a belief that working for others is thehighest ideal. Alhuism is self-sacrifice; these butchers, these monsters, did notsacrifice themselves, they sacrificed, and ordered the sacrifice, of tens ofmillions of your fellorv human beingS. Is it any wonder that nowadays ttreyprefer to call themselves anti-fascists rather than Bolsheviki?

Unfortunately, the Tom Caldwells of this world, the gen 'ing humanitarians,the genuine idealists, the genuine altruists, have been, and continue to be takenin by, the trite slogans of the Socialist Internationat peace, goodwill to all men,liberating the workers, and the Universal Brotherhood of Man. This book hasbeen written for those who seek more than slogans, who look behind theslogans, and who seek to genuinely improve the lot of the common peopleeveryrvhere. The truth about socialism, like the truth about nfascismn, is notdifficult to find" but most socialists don't see it simply because fhey don't wantto see iL lhey seek instead the revealed truth of MaIx and l-cnin, or the"proletarian truth" of the Bolsheviki. It is truly amazing that so many othere-wise highly intelligent people from so many different backgrounds from somany different countries and at so many times, should have been so easily, andso comprehensively deceived, but to paraphrase MaIx, socialism is the opiumofthe people. The task ofLibertarians, and ofthis short study, is to arousemankind from this new, opium-induced sleep.

139


Selected Bibliography

Abzug, Robert H.z INSIDE THE WCIOUS HE/IRT AMERICANS AND THELIBERATION OF NAZI CONCENTRATTON CA.MPS, published by OdordUniversityPrrcss, O:dord, (1985) & (19E2).ALL ENGL/LND tAW REPORTS, (1981).Allen, Garywith Abraham, Larryr None Dare Call It Conspiracy, published by

Concord Press, Seal Beach, Califomia, Third printing (April, 1972).Allen, Garyr THE ROCKEFELLER FlLEr lntroduction by Congressman

Larvrcnce P McDonald" published by ?6 Press, Seal Beach, Califomia, (Fe-bruary196).Arnerican Hebrew newspaper, (selected issues).Atnerican Renahsance magazine, (selectetl issues).Anderson, Bridget BR/D4-IN',S SECRET SL4WS: An Investigation into the

Plight of Oveneas Domestic Worken in the United lfrngdom, published byAnti-Slavery International & Kalayaan and the Migrant Domestic Workers,Lond.on, (1993).

Anonymous: AN ACCOWT OF TIIE Murder of a Female Negro, Who wasFloged to Death by order of an WMERCIFUL UPTAIN...Shewing the Iniryityof ihe Slave Tiade,..rprinted byJ. Evans, London, (c1810).

Antonio, Gene: THE AIDS COWR-UP? The Real and Alarning Focts aboutAlDsrpublished by rgatius Press, San Fhancisco, Second. edition, (1987).

Baron, Alexanden EYSENCK AND THE NAZIS: Another "searchligltt"Smear ExltosedAnd Refuted published by Anglo-Hebrerv Publishing, [,ondon,(1e94).Baron, Alexanden HOLOCAUST DENIAL: NEIry NAZI LIE or NEW IN-

SWSffiON? A Defence Of Free Inquiry And The Necessity Of Rewriting History,published by Anglo-Hebrew Publishing, Iondon, (January 1999.

Baron, Ale.xanden How The Searchlight Organisation Incites HAedAgainstfqws: A Fresh LookAt The Scapegoat Theory Of Anti-SemitismAnd TheWorldZionist Conspira4t -withthefulltact of the "Gable Memorandum"rpublisheilbyAnglo-Hebrew Publishing London, (Juty 1994).

140


Baron, Alexanden LARS OUGHT TO IAW GOOD MEMORIES: TheTiue, Unsanitised Story Of 'searchlig/tt" Mole Ray Hillwith auitique of The OtherFace of Tbnor,pubtished by InfoTbxt Manuscripts, L,ondon, (Augusf 1994).

Bates, Stephen and Donovan, Patrick MPs to quiz gas chief over pay' publish'ed in the Guardian, December t6'1994, page 1.

Beary, John: The Iron Cuftain OverAmeica, published bymkinson, Dallas,(19s1).

Belisario, ANI.z THE TRAL OF ARTHUR H OD GE, ES 8.. AT T'HE Islandof Tortola, ONTHE 21T'IIAPRIL, 1811..., [as recorded byA.M. Belisario andcertifieil by Richard Hetheringtonl , printed for John Harding London, (1811).

Bilbo, Senator Theodore G.: TAKE YOUR CHOICE - SEPARATION ORMONGRELIZATION,published by Historical Review Press U.S.A-, Decatur,Georgia, 2nd Impression, (1980).

T\e Blacl<shirf newspaper, (selected issues).Bleackley, Horace: LIFE OF JOHN WILKE$ published by John Lane, Lon'

don, (1917).Bolsover, Philip:, No Colour Barfor Bitain,published bythe Communist Farty

of Great Britain, London, (195t.Boing Month|, (selecteit issues).B oing N ews, (selected issues).Branden, Barb araz THE PAS SION OF AYN RAND' published by\{H. Allen,

Iondon, (1987).British Fascists Ltdu- The British Lion, (selected issues).British Fascists Ltd: TIIE FAS CIST BWLETIN: The only Oryan of the Bitish

Fas cists, (selected issues).British Fascists IJ;d:The Fascist Gazette, (selected issues).Broad,I{illiam & Wade, Nicholas: BETRAWRS OF THE TRUTH: Fraad

szd Deceit in Science,published by Odord University Press, O:dord, (1985).Broers, AJec Choices for tomonow's chips, published inthe New Scienfisf' No

1817, 18 April 92,pages?3-7.Butz,A.R: The Hom Of The Twentieth Cenfitry,published by Historical Review

Prtss, Brighton, Sussex, Seconil Edition, (1977).Chesterton, A.K.: THE NEW WHAPPY LORDS: AN EXPOSURE OF

POWER POUflCS, published by Candour Publishing London, (Juty 1965)'and Fourth Revised Edition, 2nd Printing, published by candoul pu[lishing,

Hampshire, (l9]S).

1,41


Chicago Defender newspaper (selected issues for 1936).Chirimuuta, Richard & Chirimuuta, Rosalind: AIDS, AFfuICA AND

RACISM, New and revised edition, published by Free Association Books,London, (1989).

Cole, G.D.H: A HI ST O RY O F THE IllB O UR PARW F RO M 19 14, publisheilbyLondon, Routledge & Kegan Paul, (1948).

Collier, DrJoe The Health Conspiracy: How Doctorc, The DrugIndustryAndThe Govemment Undermine Our Health, published by Century Hutchinson,London, (1989).

Cox, Earnest Sevien.L/NCOIN'S NEGRO PoucY,published bytie Noon'tide Press, Los Angeles, (1968).

Cross, ColinzTHE E4.SCISTS IN BRITAIN, published by Barrie and Rock'lifi,Iondon, (1961).Daily Express, London, (selected issues).Daily Sketch newspaper, Lnndon, (selected issues).Delmer, Sefton: Black Boornerang AN AWOBIOGRAPI:N, (Volume Tivo)'

published by Secker & Warburg, London, (1962).I)elmer, Sefton: Tiail Sinister: AN AWOBIOGRAPHY (Volume One)' Pub'

lisheil by Secker & Warburg, London, (1961).Delph, Ed\naril William: The Silent Community: Public Homosanal En-

counters rpublished by Sage Publications, London, (197E).Denning Right Honourable Sir Alfred Qater Lord): FREEDOM UNDER

THE L/lw,published by Stevens & Sons, London, (1949).Donovan, Patrictr, (see entry for Bates, Stephen).Douglas, C.H: Social Credit, publisheil bythe Institute of Economic Democ-

racy, (Douglas CentenaryEdition), published by Bloomfield Books' SudburySuffoilq $nD.

Douglas, C.Hz THE MONOPOLY OF CREDIT,Introduction by GeoffreyDobbs, published by Bloomfield Boolis, Sudbury, Suffo[q (1979).

Dynes, Wayne R.: (Editor): Encyclopedia of Homosextalrry, published by StJames Press, London, (1990).

\\e Economisf, fondon, (selected. issues).Enqclop aedia Bitannica, Macrop ae dia and. Microp ae dia, variots editions.Encyclopedia Atnericana International Edition, published by Americana Cor-

poration, Washington, D.C., (L977r.30 volumes.Evening Stondard newspaper, London, (selected issues).

142

FBEEDOM UNDER SOCIALISM?

Eysenclc, Hans: Rebel WithA Cause rpublished by\{H. Allen, London, (1990).Fakhry, MarceL LIBYA: Gadhafi Hurnan Nghts Award Given Tb the Fight

Agains t AI D S in Afrk a, published in S p are Rib, J nly L992, pages 46-7 .Finoncial Times, (selected issues).FitzGibbon, Iouis: Kntyn A Crime Wthout Parallel, pablished by the Noontide

Press, Tor:rance, California, (1y79).Foot Paut THE CASE FOR SOCIALISM: WHAT TTIE SOCIALISTWOR-

KERS PARW ST4NDS FOR. published by the Socialist Workers Farty, Lon-don, (July 1990).

George, John andWilcox, Laird: Nazis, Communists, Klansmert and Otherson ihe Finge: POLITICAL EXTREMISM IN AMERICA. published by Pro-metheus Books, Bufralo, NewYork, $9n).

Glazebrook, ER..z Blaclcstone's Statutes on CRIMINAL IllW 19945, 4th Edi-tion, published by Blackstone Pressr London, (1994).

Gornan, Tbresa, MB (see North, Richard).Griffin, G.Eilward: T'HE FEARFW MASTER:A SECOND LOOKATT'HE

UNITED NAZON,S, published byWestern Islands, Belmont Massachusetts,(1964).Grimstad, William: TIIE SD{ MILLION RECONSIDERED: Is the 'Nazi

Holocanst' Story a Zionist Propaganda Ploy?, published by Historical ReviewPress, Chapel Ascote, Ladbroke, Southam, Warks, (1979).

Hamood, Richard [pseudonym of RichardVerrall (and otherc?)]: Did SixMillion Really Die? The TiuthAt Last,also knoum as Srx Million LostAnd Found,publisheil by Historical Review Press, (various editions).

Ilayeb F-A..zThe Constitution of Libefty, published by the University of Chi-cago Prcss, Chicago, (1960).

Hayelr, F.A.zTHE ROAD TO SERFDOM,published by George Routledge &Sons, London, (1944).

Ilerdt Gilbert, PhD (Eilitor): Gay and LesbianYouthrpublished by HaworthPress, Nern York, (1989).

Hitler, Adolf: IflE TESUMENT OF ADOLF HITLER The Hitler-BormannDocuments February-Apil 1945, Edtted. by Fbangois Genoud" Ibanslated fromthe German by Colonel R.H. Stevens, Introduction by H.R lhevor-Roper,publishetl by Icon Books, [,ondon, (1962).

Iloar, WilliamP;z ARCHITECTS OF CONSPIRACY An Inriguing History,published byWestern Islands, Boston, (1984).

143


Hollande4 Parulz POLITICAL PILGRIMS: Tiavels of Westem Intellectuals tothe Soviet Union, Ching and Cuba 192&1978, publisheil by Harper Colophon,Harpers & Row, London, (1983).

Hyde, Douglasz I Believed,published byWilliam Heinemann, I-ondon' (1950).T\e Independent netrspaper, including the Independent On Sundoy, London,

(selected issues).Institute of Contemporary History/lYiener LibrarSr Wener Library Bulletin,

(selected issues).Institute of Jewish Affairs: Patterns Of Prejudice, (selected issues).Institute of Race Relations:Roots of racism, London, (19E2).INWSTORS CHRONICLE, London, selected issues for 1995.Iring, David: Churchill's War: The Strugle For Power, published by Veritas'

Bullsboolg Westem Austr:alia, (1987).Irving Dadd: HITLER'S WAR,pablished by Focal Point Publications, Inn'

don, (1991).Jauber! Nainz MAI{ING PEOPLE DISAPPEARAn Arnazing Chronicle of

Photographic Deception, published by Pergamon-Brassey's InternationalDefense Publishers, Inc, Mclean, Virginia, (1989).Iewish Chronicle newspaPer' London, (selected issues).Johnston, Sir Harry H. K.C.B.: Bitish Central Aftica AN ATTEMPT TO

GIVE S OME ACCOUNT OF A P ORTI O N OF THE TERRITO RIES UNDERBRIfiSH INFLWNCE NORTI{ OF mE ZAMBEZI' published by Methuen,London, (1E97).

Jordan, Colin: FRAUDULENT CONWRSION: The Myih Of Moscow'sChange Of Heart,published by the Britons, London, (1950.

Knightley, Philip: THE FIRST CASUALW: From the Crirnea to Wetnan: TheWar Corespondnnt as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker' published by Quar'tet Books paperback edition, London, (1978).Labour Left Biefing (formerly Labour Bifing), selected. issues.Ire, Nbert: Henry Ford and the fews, published by Stein and Day' NervYorlq

(1e80).Irnin: Colkcte d Worlcs. (I)Lcnin, VI., @tlited by E. Varga, L. Mendelsohn): IMPERULISM, THE

HIGHEST STAGE OF CAPITZLISM, published by Iawrence & TVishart'London, (1939)"

144


f,enin, Nikolai (ie YI. [Jlianov): 'Left Wing' Communisnt: An Infantik Disor-der, published by the Communist Party of Great Bdtain, London, $920\.

Ienin (VI. LJlianov): THE STATE AND REVOLUTION: Monist teaching onthe State andthetaskof the Proletaiatinthe Revolution, publishedbythe BritisbSocialist Party, Iondon, (October 1919).

Moore, Patrictc THE STORY OF ASTRONOMY, published by Macdonaldand Jane's, lnndon, Fifth Revised Edition' (1977).New Humanl51 pagazine, (selected issues).New York Tirnes newspaper, (selected issues).North, Richard & Gonnan, Tbresa, MP.: Chickengate, published by the IEA

Health and Welfare Unit, l,onilon' (1990).OBITUARIES FROM THE fiMES 1951-19ffi, published by Newspaper

Archive Developments, Reading, (ly7 9).O'Donnell, Bemard: LEON TROTSI<Y CURSED BY FATEIER Tiail of Tbr-

rorzsf, published in the Ernpire News, Sunday August25rt940, page 5.Pendell, Elmen Ph.D.: SEJ{ WRSUS CIVILIzuTION, published by the

Noontide Press, Ios Angeles, Califomia' (L967).T\e People rnewspaper, London, (selected issues).Phillips, Ralmond: TKIAL OF IOSEF KRAMER AND FORTY-FOUR

OTHERS (The Belsen Tiial), @ditor), Foreword by the Rigbt Hon" LordJowitg published byWilliam Hodge' London' (1949).

Pike, Henry kA HISTORY OF COMMUMSM IN SOUIII AFRICA,pUb'lished by Chrisdan Mission Inteinational of South Africa, Germiston, SouthAfrica, Second Edi6on [Revised and enlarged], (1988).

Pine, Lisa: IASHWEAN EXPERIMENT IN NAZI'ASOCAL'POLICY,published inHis'tory Tbdny,July 1995, pages 37{3.

Pirie, Madsenz THE BOOK OF THE FALLACV A training manual forintelleaual subvercives, published by Routledge & Kegan FauI' London' (1985).

Pool, James & Pool, Suzanne WHO FINANCED HITLEk The Secret Fund-ing of Hitlefs Rise to Power 19 19- l933,plblished by Macdonald and Jane's/Fu'tura,Iondon, (lYIg).

Public Record Office, Kew: selected files including British Fascist papens,miscellaneous Ifome Offrce files and Special Branch rcports.

Quest, Caroline, @ditor)z Equal Opponunities : A Feminist Fal/acy' publishedby the IEA Health and Welfare Unit london , (1992).

L45


Quigley, Professor Camoll: TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A History of THEWORLD in Our TimerSecond. Printing Angriff Press, Ios Angeles, (194).

Rando Ayn: T'HE WRTUE OF SELFISHNESS: A New Concept of Egoism,with additional articles by Nathaniel Branden, published by New AmericanLibrary (1964).

Rand, Ayn, Peikoff, I*onard @ditor): The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objec-tivist Thoughr, published by Nw American Library (1989).Revel, Jean-Flangois: THE FLIGHT FROM TRWH: The Reign of Deceitin

the Age of Infonnation lhanslated from the Flench by Curtis Cate, publishedbyRandom House, NewYork, (1991).

Robertson, Wilmot The Dispossessed Majority, Second Revised Edition,Fourth Daperback Printing, published by Howard Allen, Cape Canaveral,Gna.Roclcwell, George Lincoln: WHITE POWER, (publisher uncredited), Second

Edition, (September 197).Roclcwell, Llewell5n H. Jr, (Editor)z THE FfuEE MARKET READER Essoys

in the Economics of Libeny, published by The Ludwig von Mises Institute,Burlingame, Califomia, (198E).SA Times, (selected issues).Schuanz, Dr F'redz The Heart, Mind and Soul of COMMWISM -A LECTURE,

published by the English Consultative Committee of the International Councilof Christian Churches, (1957).

Schwarz, Dr F)ed:What Is Communism?, Comrnunist Dialeaic andCornrnun-ist Recruitmenf. [This is a series of tapes published by the Christian Missionto the Communist World, Bromley, Kent, (undated), under the generic titlelilhat Is Communism?f.

Schunarz, Dr Fbed: You Can Ihtst The Communists, published by Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Second Printing, (October 1960). Searchlightmagazine, London, (various issues).

Shub, Daviil N.:IJ9NIN, published by Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex,la Pelican bookl, (1960.Smith, AdamzTheWealth Of Nations,published by Penguin English Library,

(1e82).Socialist Party of Great Britainz SOCALIST STUDIES NO.I6, (undated but

published early 1995).S ocialist Worker newspaper, (selected issues).

146


Socialist Worker: THE Q4,SE AGAINST IMMIGRATION CONTROLS -SOCULISTWORKERPOCKET PAMPHLET NO. 6, London, (c198).

Sowell, Thomas: CIVIL RIGHTS: Metoic or Reality?, published by WlliamMomow, New York, (1984).Spearhead magazine, (selected issues).$talin, Joseph: PROBLEMS OF LENINISM, published by Forcign Lan-

guages Publishing House, Moscow, (1945).Steffgen, Kent H.: The Bondage of the Free: A Citical Exantination of the

mimarned"civil ights" cansefrornthe CivilWarThroughthe ColdWarrplblishetlby Vanguard Books, Berkeley, Califomia, (1966).

Stoddard" Lothrop: THE RISING TIDE OF COLOR AGAINST WHUEWORLD-SWREMACII, published by Chapman and Hall, Lond.on, (1920).Sunday Times tewspaper, London, (selected issues).Suffon, Antony C: NATIONAL SWCIDE: Military Aid to the Soviet Union,

publisherl by Arlington llouse, New Rochelle, NewYorlg Fourth printiog, (Juoernq.

Suffon, Antony C,:The Best Enemy Monq Can Buy,Foreword by North, Gary,Ph.D: published by Liberty House Press, Billings, Montana, (19EO.

Sutton, Antony C; Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, published byArlington House, New Rochelle, N.Y., (1974).

Sutton, Antony CzWaIl Street and the Nse of Hitler, published by }76 Press,SeaI Beach, Califomia, $974.Thme, Chris R: 'IUNK SCIENCE' IN ACTION: CRITICAL NOTES ON

T'HE EIII4RONMENIAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA), published byFORESI fondon, (June 1992).

Tbanager receives lifu sentence for boy's murder, published in Netls Shopper,March 3, 1993, page 4.

Ihayer, George THE BRITISH POLITICAL FRINGE: A ProfiIe, publishedby Anthony Blond, London, (1969.

The Nght Ttmes, (selected issues).Thurlow, Richard C:.E4.SCISM IN BRITUIN A History, 191&l985,published

by Basil Blackrrell, Ordord, (1987).Tirnes nevrspaper, Iondon, (selected issues).Tingle, Rachek GAY LESSONS: How Public Funds are used to promote

Homosewality arnong Children and Young People, published by PickwickBooks, London, (1980.

r47


Thotslcy, I*onz MY LIFE: An Attempt at an Autobiography, published byCharles Scribner's Sons, NewYortq (L930).lbotslry, l"c.onz THE REVOLUflON BETRAWD: WHAT IS T'HE SOWET

UNION AND WHERE IS IT GOING?,Tbanslated byMax Eastman, publishedby Doubleday, I)oran, Garden City, NJ, (1937).

Tse, Dr K.K-: MARKS & SPENCER: Anatomy of Bitain's Most EfficientlyManaged Companyrpublished by Pergamon, Ordord, (1985).

Univen al lewish Encyclopedia, (10 volumes). (2)Yeale, RI.P:IDVANCE TO BARBARISM: The Development of Tbtal Warfarc

From Serajevo to Hiroshima, published by the Institute for Historical Review,Torrance, Califomia, (1979).Yeale, F.I.P: Crimes Discreetly Veiled, published by the Institute for Historical

Revieq (1Y79).Verrall, Richard, (see under Harwood, Richaril).Wade, Nicholas, (see entryfor Broad,Wliam).\{alendy, Udoz ForyedWar Cimes Malign The German Nation, publisheil by

Verlag firr Volkstum und Zeitgeschichtsforschung D4n3 VlothoAileser,GND.WeyI, Nathanielz Karl Man: Racrsf, published by Arlington House, New Yor\

6nD.Witaken' Almanock, published by Whitake5 London, (selected editions).White, Dr Margaret TWO MILLION SILENT KILLINGS: THE TRUTH

AB OW AB ORfiO N, published by Marshall Pickering Basingstoke, Hants,(1987).Wilcox, Laird: CRYING WOLF: Hate Cime Hoaxes In Ameica, published by

Laird Wilcox Editorial Research Services, Olathe, KansaSr (1994).Wilcox, Laird (see entry for George, John).Willan, Philip: PWPETMASIERS; The political use of tenoism in ltaly,

publisheil Constable, London, (1991).WoE Manin J.z The fapanese Conspiraq: The Plot Tb Dontinate Indtstry

Worldwidc - and how to deal with it, published by New Engtish Library Seve-noaks, Kent, (1984).World Jewish Congress: Wofld fevwy: THE REWEW OF T'HE WORLD

IEWSH CONGRES S, (selected issues).Yat-sen, Dr. Sun: SAN MIN CHU I: THE THREE PRINCIPLES OF I:HE

PEOPLE,Wilth Tivo Supplementary Chapters By Chiang Kai-shelg Thanslated

148


into English by fbank W Price, publishetl by China Publishing Company,Thipei, (Printing unrlated).Yat-sen, Dr. Sun: The Three Pinciples of the People, Abridged from the

translation by Fiank l{ Price, published by China Publishing Company,Ihipei, (19E1).

149


Notes And References

Chapter One: What Are We Talking About?

(1) For the record, in general I spell socialism (and socialist) with a small sand communism (and communist) with a small c. Generally I spell fascism(anil fascist) with a small f. However, when I am referring to the terms

specifically rather than generically, I capitalise. The words Nazi and Nazism Ialways spell with capital letters because they are always proper nouns.

(2) Throughout this work I have used the words comm'nist and socialistmone or less interchangeably. This is a point that is hardly worth debating.lbue, there are niid socialists - David hving once referred to himself as a mild

fascist - when I refer to socialists I mean, gen'erally, people who accept all themajor tenets of socialist philosophy, in particular the total state control andownership of the means of production, and the concepts of class urar andproletarian dictatorshiP.

(3) The following information on Tbotslry, which is non-contentious, wasculled from the Encyctopedia Ameicana Intemational Edition, 1;977 . The entryTROTSItr, can be found in Volume27, pages 157-8.

(a) See pages 58-9.(5) You Can Trust The Communists, by Dr Fred Schwarz, published by

Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Second Printing, (October 1960), page

43. According to schwan, thotslty was not a Menshevik either, and hoveredsomewhere between the two factions. For tle record" Schwau analyses of theintellectual perversion known as Mamism are amongst the linest everwritteu.

(A LEON TROTSItr CURSED BY FATHER Tiail of Tbroist, by Bemard

O'Donnell, published inthe Empire News, Sunday August 25, 1940' page 5.(7) Pollittwas the son of a boilershopworker. see for example2BITUARIES

FROM THE TIMES 1951-1960, published by Newspaper Archive Develop-ments, Reading, (1979)'Page 579.

150


(E) Castro is a doctor of law; Mao tse-Iirng was studentJibrarian at tleNational University of Peking; Chou en-Li was the son of a wealthy aristocratwho was converted to communism when studying at a Erench universit5r.

(9) Ali once refemed to himself as anAsianl

Chapter Tbvo: Money, Profit And Wealth

(1) Flom The Invened Moral Pioities, published originally intheAyr RandLetter, July 15, I974rbnt quoted here from The Voice of Reason: Essays inObjectivist Thought,by !rym Ranil, Edited by Leonard Peikoff, published by NewAmerican Library, (1989), prye274.

(2) Wtlely reported in all mainstream news media at the time, but see forexample SHARE AND SIURE ALIKE KEEPS WEALTH FLOWNG,pnb-lished in the,INZESTORS CHRONICLE,T-L2 April,1995, page 9.

(3) Which must have cost a staggering amount of money.(4) This is a famous quote and is taken from a speech made atWest Chester,

Pennsylvania, October 21, 1964. I am informed that these words were probablywritten by his speech writer Karl Hess.

(5) Again, see pages 5E-9.(6) I have a soft spot for Mr Gates; this book would not have been possible

without him!(n f.HE STORY OF ASTRONOMY, by Patrick Moore, published by Macdo-

nald and Jane's, London, Fifth Revised Edition, (1977), page 111.(E) Moore, The Story Of Astronomy, page 111, (ibid). Sir William Herschel

(1738-LnD was Ro;al Asftonomer (not Astronomer RoSal); it was he whodiscovercd the planet Uranusl his son, Sir John FrederickWilliam Herschel(1792-L87l)rwas also a famous astronomer.

(9) Moore, The Story Of Astronomy,pageLl4, (ibid).(10) h 1917, (iethe date Moore's booknas published), [Moore, The Story Of

As tronomy, page l1.4, (ibid) ] .(11) Moore, The Story Of Astronomy,pagelL7, (ibid).(12) Moore, The Story Of Astronomy, page 118, (ibid).

1-51


(il1) For an alteinative view of the philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie and JohnD. Rockefeller (and his heirs), the reader is referred to ARCHITECTS OFCON SPIRAffi An Intriguing History,byffilliam P Hoar, published byWesternIslands, Boston, (198a); and to two boolcs in particular by the Americanconspiracy theorist Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, (uritten withLarry Abraham) and published by Concord Press, Seal Beach, California'Third printing, (April, 1972);and,THE ROCKEFELLER FILE, published by76 Press, Seal Beach, Califomia, (February 1976).

(14) FOREST argues that the organisation is funded by public subscriptionand by donations from Britain's nfrte enterprise tobacco companiesn ! UnlikeASH, it does not receive a penny from the state.

(15) In reality, the ruling elite that controlled the state.(1O Outsitle the ring!(17) Throughout historythe state has ouflawed universal suffrage' the belief

that the Earth is spherical, the theory of evolution, non'state approved reli'gions and all manner of heresiesralcohol, homosexuality, pornography (in thebroadest sense of the word), IQ tests, and. various kinds of music. It hasenshrined in law slavery child labour, the subjection ofwomen, and all mannerof ottrer iniquities. This list could be extended greatly.

(18) Change and progress are of course two entirely disparate entities' butthe point should be taken.

(19) Certain medical charities have become notorious for their bacHng ofterrorist gfoups in Africa in the struggle against so-called. racism. On ahumbler scale, in 1995 the curent writer found a so-called community projectin North l,ondon that was selling hate literature in its shop, including onepublication which incited the murder of a government minister and anotherwhich gloated over the murders of three French policemen. Needless to say Ircported this to the authorities.

(20) The American Conservative Gary Allen (among others) has suggestedthat certain super-rich families set up foundations not primarily for charitablepurposes but to pneserve and compound their own wealth tax free whileimposing a progrrcssive taxation on the wealth of their competitors. [see inparticrrlarNone Dare Call It Conspiracy andThe Rockefeller File' (op cit)1.

(21) It would very likely make the problem worse, because a state monopolyof credif as with a state monopoly of anything else, is likely to be even moreineflicient than the admittedly, already corrupt system of debt servicing.

152


Q2) The Monopoly of Credit, byC.H. Douglas,4th Edition, BloomfieldBooks,Sutlbury Suffolk, (1979),page29.It is clear from this that by "protit'Douglasdoesn't mean simply financial reward. For example, most people will help ablind man across a busy road without asking, some simply because it is theright thing to do, others, it might be said find it "prolitable" to help a feltowhuman being in need, ie it makes them feel good.

(23) In his 1944 study THE ROAD TO SERFDOM (page 89), FA. Ilayekattributes this quote to Thotslcy, t937.ln a footrote relating to the rcference onpage 1it7 of The Constitution of Libeny, published by the University of ChicagoPress, London, (1960), he attributes the same quote to Thotslry inThe Revol-ution Betrayed NewYorlg (1937),page76.I have read The Revolution Betrayedpretty much cover to cover, and as far as I can tell, this quote doesn't appearanyvhere in tle book It is possible therefore that Thotslry did not actuallywritethese words, but they are certainly consistent with his ideologr, and if he didn'trvrite them, tlen certainly he, Lcnin and Stalin, would all three of them haveheartily approved of their sentiments for they are very much in the spirit of themonstrous philosophy which is socialism.

Chapter Threq Socialism, MinoritiesAndWorthyCauses

(Ll l{arl Mam Racist,by Nathaniel Weyl, published by Arlington House, NewYorlg (199), pagel26.

(2) There are variations on this,Q) Weyl, Karl Marx: Racist,page 126, (op cit). Weyl gives this as \ilorkers of

the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains and a world to gain!"(4) TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A History of THE WORLD in Our Time,by

Carroll Quigley, Second Printing,AngriffPress, Los Angeles, (1974)rpage37S.(O Quigley, Ti,agedy And Hope, page 37 6, (ibid).(O Quigley, Tiagedy And Hope,page 380, (ibid).(7) Michael Marks was a Jewish refugee who, fleeing from pogroms in

Russian Poland, adopted this name on his arrival in England. His real name

153


was something hideously unpronouceable. The illiterate Marks started hisworking life as a peddler, humping a pack on his back across the YorkshireDales, later he opened a market stall and the business mushroomed. TomSpencer bought into the business for frt00 and the rest is history. There areseveral infomative biographies of the Marks & Spencer organisation.

(8, MARI6 & SPENCER: Anatomy of Bitain's Most Efficiently ManagedCornpany, by Dr K.K. Tse, published by Pergamon, O:dord, (1985), page 175.

(9) Again, it is ironic that most charities are run byprofessional bureaucratswhose first commitment is that of dispersing the wealth of the rich. Into theirovm pockets! Anyonewho has seen some of the lucrative posts certain charitiesadvertise in such newspapers as the Guardian will know exactlywhat I mean.

(10)Tse,Marl<s & Spencer,pages 190-1, (op cit).(ll) Tse, Marl<s & Spmcer, page 183, (ibid).(12) I am certainly not saying that such employers d.o not existl I have ample

personal experience of this from my youth, and I can tell the reader that it isnot necessarily the case that the bigger the capitalist the meaner he is.

(13) Quigley, Ti'agedyAnd Hope, pages 380-1, (op cit).(1a) Quigley, Ti,age@ And Hope, pages 382, (ibid).(15) Quigley, Tiagedy And Hope, pages 381, (ibid).(16) Quoted from the front of THE FIRST CASUALTY From the Crimea to

hetnarn: The War Conespondent as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker,byPhilip Knightley, Quartet Books paperback edition, London, (19E). Althoughthis actual quote was made as recently as L9l7 ,the sentiment is known to datefrom at least 1758, and, doubtless, some Roman or Greek pundit said muchthe same thing. Intertstingly, Thotslry himself made a similar comment in hisbook MY LIFE: An Attempt at an Autobiography, which was publisherl in 1930.On page 284he says nNever before did people lie as much as they iliil duringthe'grrcat war for libertJr.t"

(17) An antinomian was originally one who maintained that the moral law isnot binding on Christians. The word is taken from a Geman sect of 1535. SeeThe Oxford English Dictionary,Second Edition, published by Clarendon Press,Ordord, (1989), Votume 1, page 528.

(18) Pbrsonal communication to the author dated 31 January 1994.(19) There is a distinction between fascism and National Socialism, and

purists such as the British Nazi leader Colin Jordan find the blurring of thetwo ideologies offensive, butwe are concerned here onlywith generalities.

t54


Q0) Univenallewish Enqtclopedia,Volume 8, pages 68-9, (1942).(21) It is conveniently forgotten today, but the "fully socialistic' south African

Labour Party was initially a staunch advocate of 'White Socialism". For adetailed discussion ofthe true nature ofsocialism in South Africa the readeris referred to the excellent book/ HISTORY OF COMMUNISM IN SOWHAFRICA, by Henry R. Pike, published by Christian Mission International ofSouth Africa, Germiston, South Africa, Second Edition [Revised and en-largedl, (1988). See in particular Chapter Five.

(22) But if they did that, theywouldn't be socialists!(23) Encyclopedia of Homosentality,Edrtcd byWayne R. D5mes, published by

St James Prrcss, London, (19X)), VolumeZrpage 773, (ibid).Q4) Dynes, Encyclopedia of Homosexuality,Yolume 2, prye 773, (ibid).(25) The wording may vary in particular the second line may read nThuggery

buggery murder and war!" [Thanks to Nick Griflin and to the Mosley Archive].(2O One homosexual activist actually said 'Don't call us AIDS victims. AIDS

is not mywealoess. AIDS is my strength." ITHE AIDS COWR-U?? The RealandAlarmingFacts aboutAIDS, by Gene Antonio, published by rgratius Press,San Fbancisco, Second edition, (1987), page 331.

Q7) One of these oppressed minoities is women, who make ap SlTo of theatlult population!

(28) In socialist dogma, anyone who isn't white can be and very often islabelled black Including ethnic Chinese!

Q9) Gays and lesbians in their terminolory.(30) To discriminate means to choosel choosing positively to do one thing is

exactly the same as choosing not to do another.(31) This is not to saythat there is no such thing as racial bigotry for examplel

such things obviously exist and are at times enshrined in law, or they may beinstitutional or personal. But the correct solution is to remove discriminatorylegislation and thereby allow individuals, companies and institutions to prac-tice discrimination in the market place where theywilt both reap ttre rewardsand pay the penalties for their behaviour.

(32) Whatever is meant by that totallyvacuous term.(33) Asians show the way, published in The New Standard (CLOSING

PRICES), May 18, 1981, page 5. (The paper changed its name briefly but it hasalrvays been knoum as the Evening Standard).

155


(34) The Bondage of the Free: A Citical Examination of the misnamed "civilrigltts" cause from the Civil War Through the Cold War,by Iftnt H. Steffgen,published byVanguard Books, Berkeley, California, (1966), pages 170-1.

(35) For a full discussion of this, the reader is referred to the essay FetalProtection, Women's Rights, and Freedorn of Contract, by Ellen fbankel PauI, inEqual Opportunities: A Ferninist Fallacy, Edited by Caroline Quest, publishedbythe IEA Health andWelfare Unit, London, (1992).This quote is taken frompages 423.

(36) See in particular the lunacy of B6la Kun, page 41.(37) While planning pemission may sound like red tape, if a companyu'ere

planning to build a glue factory or a nuclear power plant at the boffom of yourgarden, you might like to have a say in it.

(38) LENIN Tby David Shub, published by Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middle-sex, [a Pelican book], (L960,pagel77.

Chapter Four: The Rule Of Law

(1) It is important for the reader to realise that this is a fundamental tenetof their doesna, although, for obvious reasons, it is one they will not rcadilyadmit

(2) Flom What Is Communisnt, a lecture by Dr Fred Schwarz, published as atape by the Christian Mission to the Communist World. Dr Schwalz was atone time a practising M.D. in Australia; later he became an anti-communistlecturer in the United States. He has lectured anil published extensively oncommunism/socialism.

(3) This quote (italicised in the original) is actually taken from JosephStalin's bookPROBLEMS OF LENINISM, publishetl by Forergn LanguagesPublishing House, Moscow, (1945), page 43.

Stalin credits this defrnition to Lenin, in his study The StateAnd Revolution.I consulted the English translation of this work [Its full title is THE SMTEAND REVOLWION: Manist teaching on the State and the task of the Proletaiatin the Revolution,byYL Ulianov (N.Innin). One English language edition n'aspublished in London by the British Socialist Party in October 1919. Inciden-

156


tally, Lenin was the founder of the Communist Farty of Great Britainl. How-ever, it appears to have lost something in translation as I have been unable toIocate this actual quote either in the above or in anyof [,enin's turgid prose. Itis though a faithful definition, and if Lenin himsetf atidn,t use tlese exactword.s, he would certainly have endorsed them, and indeed he put them intopractice, as we shall see in due course.

(4) The Constitution of Liberty,by F.A. Haye\ published by the University ofChicago Press, London, (1960), page 154.

(5) The following is exfracte d, from Blacl<stone's Statutes on CNMINAL LAW199+5,4th Edition, by P.R Glazebrook, published by Blackstone press, Lon-don, (1994), page 11: "INFANTICIDE ACT 1938 {ilhere a woman by anywilfulact or omission causes the death of her child being a child under the age oftwelve months, but at the time of the act or omission the balance of her mindwas disturbed...'", etc.

(6) Ilayeb The Constinttion Of Libeny, page 155, (op cit). In practice it is alot more complicated t,han ttrat because if the state were to prosecute everyalleged breach of every law the courts would be swamped. The facts that thepolice will sometimes caution rather than prosecute trivial offences and thatthe croum Prosecution service will sometimes decide not to proceed withprosecutions which they believe have little chance sg 5rrsesding does no! ineither case, constitute a breach ofthe rule oflaw.

(7) This quote is verywell-known:

"Govemment is not reason;it is not eloquencelit is force! Like fire,it is a dangerous servantand a fearful master!"

Thken here from the inside dust cover of THE FEARFW MASTER: ASECOND LOOKAT THE UMTED NATIONS, by G. Edward Gritfin, pub-lished by \Testern Islands, Belmont, Massachusetts, (1964).

(E) schwarz, wat Is communism.Thereare actually three tapes in this seriesunder the generic titfewat Is comntunism? They are wat Is communism?,communist Dialectic and. communist Recruitrnent.Dottbtless they are, or lyere

157


at one time, available in pamphlet formn although I have been unable to find aprinted source for this quote.

(9) The well-publicised case of Los Angeles motorist Rodney King is a starkreminder of how tlifticult it is to bring a successful prosecution against thepolice, even with overwhelming evidence of improper behaviour. King's policeassailants battered him 56 times in 81 seconds, andwere caught on video' yettheywere stillacquiffedbyajury.If it hadn'tbeen forthe specialcircumstancesof the case 'and the riots that followed the acquittal - the retrial of the oflicers(which was double jeopardy in all but name), and subsequent convictions oftwo of tlem, would never have come about. And if the assault hadn't beencaptured on video, it is doubtful if Kingls assailants would even have beencharged. [On the beating, the acquittal and the riots that followed see forexample the Times, May 1' Lgnl.

(10) A corollary ofthis is that as soon as they start talking about conspiraciesthey can be - and usually are - written off as cranks and the sources of theirgrievances ane never eyen mentioned, much less critically examined.

(11) This information on the Magna Carta andhabeas coryus was extractedfromtheEncyclopaediaBitannica, Micropaedia, (1994)r\relrrms Trpages 673'6.

(12) After the Guildford Four, Birmingham Six and many other terrorist andnon-terrorist cases, public outcry and concem anongst politicians and law-yers has led to a new mind-set in this field. It is now no longer possible for thepolice to kick the shit out of suspects, beat confessions out of them' plantevidence on them and do what t,he hell they like, at least not on the scale theyonce di{ and certainly not in serious cases. The mandatory taping of policeinterrogations and other provisions under new civil liberties legislation hasmade miscarriages ofjustice far more unlikely. (They also protect the policeagainst malicious complaints, to some extent). There have been cries thatbecause ofthis the guitty are walking free, but that's too bad. Far better theguilf ualk than the innocent are gaoled.

(13) The above is extracted from the ALL ENGLAND LllW REPORTS,Volume2,1981, pages 612-5, Rv Holmes (Donaldson lJ).

(14) Obviously there will have to be some changes in the wording of the Iaqbut not in the dispensation of it. For example, the phrase "No bailiff shall infuture put anyole to trial upon his oum bare word, without reliable witnessesproduced for this purpose" was written before the advent offorensic science:fingerprin! DNA, voiceprint, and other such evidencel all these can now be

158


used as evidence to secure reliable convictions, but the principle that thereshould be reliable witnesses - b€ they human or mechanical - has stood the testof time.

(15) The fact that a man has an expensive larvyer does not mean tbat hewillautonatically be better represented than someone on legal aid.

(16) LIFE OF JOHNWLKES, by Horace Bleackley, published byJohn Lane,London, (1917), page 93.

(17) Bteackley, Life Of lohnWlkes,page94, (ibid).(18) Bteackley, Life Of lohnWilkes,page 102, (ibid).(19) According to one source, Pqmne was "A bigoted pamphleteer" who

published over two hundred polemics, including against the Jews. 'In 1637 helost his ears a second time (!) having had them 'sewed on again'n. lForyeriesPreceding the Protocols rbyWalter Hart Blumenthal, published in theArneicanH eb rew, J anuary 21, 1921, page 2981.

(20) Bteackley, Life Of lohnWkes,page 110, (op cit).(21) Bleackley, Lfe Of lohnWilkes,page 138, (ibid).(22) Briefly the govemment of Abraham Lincoln had printed money to

frnance the American Civil Wan lhe other altematives were to tax it or toborrow from the banking system at usurious rates. The current writer is of theopinion that Lincoln did the right thing, and that all democratically electedgovemments should have the right to print tleir orvn money and mint theirown coin, but this is not the point at issue; the point is that, whatever the law,the governmentmust obeyit.If the lawis obviouslybatl (thoughconstitutional)it must be changed by legal means.

(23) See the entry for CIASE, Salmon Portland, in the Enqclopedia Arnei-canarYolame 6, pages 328-9.

Q4) lnProblems Of Leninism, [pages 47-8, (op cit)], Stalin himself says thatThe Soviet power, by combining the legislative and executive functions in asingls 5tafs srganization...thereby directly links the workers and the labouringmasses in general with the apparatus of state administration, teaches themhow to administer the counfir."

Ihe reader may judge for himselfjust horv much say the labouring masseshad in yrrnning the country under his rdgime. And how much justice anyonehad.

159

09r

'[961 aiurl ,(Sg6I) .p.roJxo .ssa.rg ,{1;sra.rg61 proJXO ,{q paqsgqnd ,ape1lseloqt.rN T puorg uegg,g,tq .acuatcg u! IaJaO puD pnDq :IlIl1VJ gHJ lOSVgAVVJggI i.raqqlqnd pq8go aq1.asno11uopusg Eqpnleul ! papop"r11V 'sesnoq Sqqqlqnd .rofeur y1 o1 .plsqsoy ,{z.raf fq rsda4g.lalou tu.ruupr,pJE ry{oog IBUoIIEN uJo ldursnuem pad,tp.r u pallguqns Jelljl$.acuelae{V

:goda.r iq,uolloJ aql ruo{ trees eq trH) - rus!-p1-rduc.rapun spleu reqlo ,tueu pue - SuJqsqqnd q snogr;.rdee aoq $nf (r)'JIo sarpolr raq qlpr pooS su 1sn[ qool puu.rnouep saop osIE gaqdua3 @) .Unor sluuel aql uo ssa,no.rd Jeq qrfuu Jeaeu 11pr s;uopl,&ura1g.raq1eq1,tes ol lpsur ou s.l! Inq se,roglanrep sI Joqlne uB poo8laoq pnfsepr ou aaeq 1.n661. u-r uolq8no15 ry .reppog,{q paqsqqnd pue sapclN zr.rl euoqlp{ m$IJAr-or se,n .auo7 7o1o1 aq1.1atoa s.e oInBraBN ?BeJ peq B IIu lB lorrpua {ron ruAo:aq,(1afue1 aq ol p;us sr.unug.letou s,paqdue3 .r;ug eq o1 $) ' lVuau8pa1uou4)V *sl 6sqluou arnos Jo pogad uraao ua$1r,lr sea{ooq qq1la8essud.relnr.rl.rud sql Bq;;.r,nyo aru;l aql ry (t)

'qfeel Jleql q8no.rql Eu.rr(1 ,{1dqs .ro pgo,n,{sulrreJ B uI6upg .raql.ra a.re sJoqfnu aseqf Jo fuuu ,noq glasmo,t rlse puu .seruaq; pelsla.rpuu egqc,tsd uo sellll aql Jo auos l" {ool e ilIsl .doqsqooq s ofu! rpe,n no,taup Uer'ralanoq ep!s? luqf 8q,rea1.qs,(puu l?ntxal s;,t1.Ip;eeds Xf,t (g)

'E FJV {rslg t4looJ Fs uBtr\Jal!e[eql eJoJeq,rrroll?srlralr,, {cBIqJo lurye aql su,n,epuu8edo.rd 1slpgcos o1,fte.4uoc 'u-ru8e .qr1q,n spq pnu aql q aA;1 ol s,(epurou .ragand suer.r4ry.{eJ ost"qt usJ eql q sFIt Jo Joo.rd ary .uaq1 lq8no.rq uu4 etFL!\ orll puu uqplldee6usJpgadrnl slgeuaq aq1{q.roy palesuaduor ueql erorr se,n spafqns lsluolo,4at11 Jo s.ra,nod lsJp;.radu1 aql ,{q uopel;o1dxa aq1 ,upue6udo.rd lqp;cos o1,fte4uo3 'uolgolslp sso.6 e,(lqegae q fI lnq f,su1uu; Irlol B lou sI slql (Z)

'[0r-69rsa8ed r(9961) €u.rqq1qn6 BpuuurC/ulpsl"d ,tq paqsqqnd ,.raupg Ff,luore1? ryrv tq1rvo nrtgswa gHJ oJ cIT/009 yJvD suoqnlonQ p)yotslHlo ,ttouog4q yl ptall yo anbpJ.rr e o1 acegand u q sFD elo.&r rretr J ,,.agoJdaq1;o un;do aql q lI .pry;.r;dsun ars qrlqa suo$[puorJo 1.r.4ds aq1 ptrB plroinssepreeq ugo s8ugaay aq1.a.rnlua.rc passe.rddo aqlgo q6Js aql s; uo!Hl1q1' (1)

Blpentr puv slrv 6uopl1eg :e^If, reldBqJ

avrsr-rvrcos H3cNn u\oo3lul

T9T

's8uluoegoqs s,tus11u4deo .ro; alqlsuodsa.r s;

Wlqra4otza,ssr4 trEql rerller rnsluopua refq sqt s1 g pue ',trn1ua3 qpgua4f,aql Jo asJnot aql Jaao lsr-uoguarJeful ,{16u.rseanq auotaq aasq sellnouoJerrrelsal\ fuql ltuJ pr;4dua ue q8noql s; q 'a.raqrl(uu pa5pe .ri,rau suqusl1elros lurll EI"Ir oq,rr s1slppos erot p.req a4g uo ilrue ol8u-to8 1ou tu.1 (61)

'a1oq,{.rouau

aq1 ol padlsuor ueaq a,req !5pa.r3 1eltos go quauodo.rd raqlo pIIB uosl[IlJnq1.ry 'sq8noq .rofe1,q yo s8upg,n lBqruas eqf a[qra'sasg;41 uo,r 3;,npn1 3opJmq a Bq saltqt JlluouoJe pue ue-usueqlrlJo eppmo aldoed rra;,{.ra,r 'pueq

raqto eql uO ra^o plro,ra eq1 safloeu Eq11$Pue s.rolegullo,txepE u pau,nedse Bq sr1.ro r slq puu loq1ne 6q11as1saq snornnqSod B altroreq aruls 6uo1suq eq',$.r.rnesqo 1ulol ssel ro erortr q pa1p x.re1q q8noqqu rof,'usF.rutr trJo'suilel Isltuuug,(1a.rnd u! - ssattns aql q s$gJo alduuxa ogo.4 poru aqtr (31)

',{lpaarasapun,qplot 'esec s,x.re141 uI OI)'(plql) '9g1a8ed'puog utytg uolssDJ aqJ ruapuatg (91)'O!qD '911a8ed'puog uf,Vl6 uolsvrJ aqJ 'uapuerg (91).(plql) ,91y aEed,puoy ̂yl1 uolssD{ aqJ 'uepuang (y1)

41 aEuil'(nC) 6uopuol'ua11y'911.{q paqsgqnd 5uapuerg u.ruq.rug,(q' QNW N V trO NOI S SYJ gHJ G1.)

'ua,ta1g.ra1duq3

ees 'tusl1epos pus rrslunuruoJ ;o a4ods aqs sB ldualuor aues eqf qlpl[uaql;o arlods ilesraq pus5 'slenpaflalr1pa1$s are aldoad asaql '1seal ry (71)

'1elrelurtr rlrlo 4aql ellJlr oq,n srau.ro;"rad

IIs pue 6suupgsnru {JoJ Jo ,t1profeu aqf apnlJu-r f .iro8apc sqf uI (II)ialpur,teu 1 .ro no,{ auo aq1 ',tlapungogun'1ou 1ng

'paqqlqnd lou are peapq s{ooq eug,tra,r auos 1eq3,(us of lou s! slql (0I)'fuaqar;.rafue1

qrnu ,iral e yo dp aql ,{p.rau a.re s,qaqdueJ ilII salJofs sseJtns aq3 fi.ronalnrasu!pu"SuJpuumap,{.re,r qpq 5q uaryo,f,ra,rpue aq uer tu11apotr41'1e.rauaEu; uogssagold 3u111apou aq1.ro gaqdue3 reqlla epl11aq ol Sulirl fou EB I (6)

a.IaarsJ Jaq uIuo,(1.rea pa;ep ol lou uesorlJ aqs puq paIrJBe ea"q e^o$luJ sN u"roq-qJaz3 aqlppo r tnlelrce pus aungoJ'aueg qtnm,toqJlesulq {sE plnoqs JapE J eqt lnq'lla,uuauomsgods puu uausgods.rlaql pap.re,nar s,{u,rap eauq qalaoS er1;. (g)

al/\|sl]vt3os u30Nn u\ocl33Hl

Z9I

?ueppn"{ lqEprulop uaryo,ira,r pue'eue4xeeqf q )1ee,rr'peq s! aruaplaa aq1 loo8 q,f,roaq1 aql q8noq1p feql q ualqo.rd,{1uo arylou {ulql I alqfu ueql relseJ qcntu la^url uet qclqn gercaaudsrgsgn1nJ q ,{ge1n6a.r rIUBg eql llsp qrlq r pue srno uuql petrre^pu a.rorus.rea{;o suo;1llu er" leql suollsslll lJ Jo uopusl.r,rrp e q anqt lno a.raq,rraruoslsql alquqordu; os l! sI'pp s.rea,t;o suolruq s! asre lun aql'11s raryy 'poo8

spunos weql Jo ,f,roaq1 aql {u;qf ru$ I peepur puu 6s.racnes 6up{g uI Ja aleqlnoaap a aluo sB rrellrar lueJJnJ a r. 'freJ q s;suqr(uB eaBq uusurouaqd asaqlJo,tue 1uq1 e e{eq ol astrasuou q l lurll uueru l.uop 1 asuesuou,tes I uee11 (g)

'luaueternorua,{uu;1 epl{ paeu eldoad eruos leql rrluilat su ;snfs1 11 61ra.6 ,tre,r ,(1u.rq.ral sI g e[q^r lI.rerleenb a8V ua71 pure aouaps-opnesd;ouopouo.rd aql u! alor s.BIpatu aq1,(ypuenb o11dua11e of e{11 luppo,u I (g)

' 19 eEed'(OOOt)'uopuol'ua11y'11X1,tq paqqlqnd tcuas^{g sue11,{q'asnD7 V qt!il p qay ug palonS (1)

aulrlperu puvqtlBeH6uoglucnpg'ugurepuJv :4S relduqJ

'ule rEIIrtrIsu uI alpra oqr[ sJoqlns fsonr ar" su 6q1ed uapre8 eq1 dn sJepsar.r;aq1 8ugpuelIprap a.re spual4 sH pue aq puu 'qqqqn.r prps,(u a-re,(aq1 1nq 6pea.r puq B eq,{l.uussamu 1.uppo,r,{aq1 sle ou sB uelllJ r aJa*rfaq111'ptoug qruauas atlJprlre$luaqilvq)olg otlJ epnlru! s{ooq sH lraqqlqnd Euarlsuprtr u,(q dn ua4elraeq ̂rou seq aH 's6961 Xgea aq1 u.r Suqs;1qnd-gles JJo pegels su;1loJ ireJpuvpetu"u uerrr V 'paaJlns oq/n saseJ fqgo,n aq1 s,{eaqe lou q tI u;uEV (gZ)

'pussnoqf ,{gg su,{la,rgaagaf sor ss lsoulu sad4,tgg arluu uuc no.( 1"ql q umIpeu qq13o ,$nueq xq6L eT,')

'alqep.roge,tlaueqxesaqze8uupuu s;alqdruud's1ooq;o sun.r lurr{ Ioqs ilIEu salqd.rade; (17)

'dgqs.ro1e1c;pJo srrrJoJ IIB Japun 1nq uslplros Japrm,(1dut-ts 1ou sa;1dde qq1 ',{1pluapyru1 'asod.rnd .r;aq1 pa Jes a,ruq r(aq1 uaqa Jo's.ra1Jale.4,noJIeJ Jo slsilsrJos pa$luuor se{asuaql 1ou a.ru.taq; uaqtr4 (gg)

a|/\sr]vr3os H30Nn y{oo33Hr


(a) This comparison has been made before.(5) This is a study of politics, not of epistemologi, but somebody is sure to

point out righfly, that therc are times when we should deny the evidence of oursenses, including common sense. However, we should never do so without goodneasoq thus, a test pilot may deny the evidence of his senses when hisinstruments tell him that, contrary to his perception, he is flying upside doun.We should though never deny the evidence of our senses simply because rvhatthey tell us conflicts with a political doqma, or because we do not like what theytell us.

(Q Eysenck has discussed his mistreatment by red mobs in his autobio-graphyRebelWthA Canse, (op cit).

(7) The reader is referred to the in-depth inteniew with Eysenck by thecurentnriter in his stady EYSENCKAND THE NAZIS : Another "Sea.rchliglrt"Srnear ExposedAnd Wted, published by Anglo-Hebrew Publishing, London,(1994).

(8) Again, this controversy is absolutely no controversy whatsoeveE there isgood data on this going back to the First World War and before, and it hasnever been refuted.

(9) It is true that the reality ofintelligence and other racial differences cianbe exploited by evil men, but leaving aside the incontestable fact that the Nazishad no monopoly of those, the idea of equality before the law, or more properlythe rule of law and justice for every man regardless of his race, intelligence,socio+conomic status or any other criteria, has absolutely nothing to do withbiologr, although taking such innate dilferences into consideration may wellassist us in shaping social policy.

(10) See for example the section on Lysenko in BETRAWRS OF THETRWH, (opcit).

(11) A date which was formulated by the then Archbishop of Armagh, JamesUssher (15E1-165O.

(Ul) See his entry in the Encyclopaedia Bitannica, Miuopaedia, FifteenthEdition, (1994), Volume 7, page 11.4-5.

(tt) See entry forLysenlco, Tlofim Denisovfcft, publishedin theEnqclopaediaBitannica, Micropaedia, Fifteenth Edition, Volume 7, pages 5934.

(L4) Enqtclopaedia Bitannica" Micropaedia, Fiftwnth Edition, Volume 7,page 594. The reader should compare this with the de igueur socialist-inspired

163


claptrap about race having no biological meaning; this is where this sort ofnonsense leads to.

(LS) OnIy a moral revolution can contain this scourge, by Sir ImmanuelJakobowits, published in the Times ,December 27 ,1986, page 20. Sir Immanueluas later elevated to the peeragel his surname is also spelt Jakobovits.

(1O Citsd in AIDS, A-fAtCe AND RACISM, by Richard and RosalindChirinuuta, New and revised edition, published by Flee Association Books,London, (19E9), page 6.

(17) lt is important to remember that just as tle "anti-racistn lobby is notmade up exclusively of non-whites, so the gay "rigfits" lobby is not made upexclusively of homosexuals. The l-abour MP Ken Uvingstone is a prominentheterosexual ga)t "rights" activist.

(18) As a lifelong atheist and enemy of religion - which I regard as a primitivesuperstition - I can't say that I will lose any sleep over this. However, in a trulyfrce society, people must have the right to educate their children in whatevermanner they see fit, including in religious instruction.

(19) See for example GAY LESSONS: How Public Funds are used to promoteHomosmtality among Children and Young People , by Rachel fingle, publishedby Pic.kwick Books, London, (1986).

(20) This argunent may seem to run contrary to the current unitefs argu-ments in favour of Social Credit but this is not the case. the factors ofproduction, human nesources in particular, are always limited, but clearlytheyarc not limited to the same extent in every economic freld; roadsweepers willahrays be more easily rccruited than brain surgeons because virtually anyonecan sweep a road while only the talented few can perform specialist surgery. liorrccruit any number of road sweepers an employer need only increase the ratefor the job sufliciently.

(21) See the article PROHIBITION inthe Encyclopedia Aneicana, (1977),Volume 22, pages 646-E.

164

99r

pesn su,n pue sls! pte ,Js!mr-We,, (pa1pc-os) ,{q ,{1;aqqnd snouroua ua,rpsu,n uugsy 8uno,t qq1 yo .rap.rnu 9661 ,tp1 aryptrlnq 4qog ,(oqlooqcs dnep;5p1o .rea.t 9I Jo Jepmu aql sB t sptrf Jo alduexa Sqruaqels g luelleJxe uV (fi)

. (plqD \7 afied., tslcoy xtoytl ytrS7.ga6 (71)'(1;r do) 'yg a8ud'ls1cog xtoytl ya2'$a6fi1)

'(SgOf) 'sa1aEuy so1 'ssa.r6 appuooN eq1,{q peqsgqnd to3.re! eS fserrreg Aq'7'3.7IOJ OVggN S,N1O)NI7 ol peueJar s! rapuer eql'o.6a11aq1 o1 epn1glu s.uJocug olu-r lqSgsug uu.rog 'Eup1eru-JegpsJtn pue esuas-uou sseg se pasodxa uaaq 3uo1 aleq s8ugurraH,tl1es perueu ssa.6ap

" WI,la

semluaapE lEnK|s puq aq fBql sulup aq1 :Jau,no eaBls e sB,lt uosra$ef (0f)' (1;e do)' 77 ateil' qs1cog xto14J 1toy'$aps (6)

' (pKD' gy61'o4utmryg olpaodo1ctcug (g)'1,-919 satud 'g1awin1oS'V-7gg i\rDf 'uop.rpe gt6l eql u;,{.4u4 aql Eo.q ua{slq,f.ruurnns EqrraottoJ aql 'uoglpa $elBI erp q,ft1ua,tug e,{go suq uql (1,)

.'qlIBarI JFtrorroJe s.slssng 6u.uo1sar.ro3 alqusuadqpul sB,h aPB4alu,rprd leql pe$1upe aq ̂roN'eltreqleue se asgd.ralua apa.r.rd paplu8ar puqmue'I816I u1"'roqlnu slql ot Eulp.roray'(plqD '11y a8ud'u1ua7 'qnqs 0)

'(;p tlo) '719efled'4ua7'qnqg (g)'(696I) 'uopuol'1.reqslAl T aauarmul,tq pe

-qqlqnd'uqosppua141'1 6utuur1'9,(q pa11p g.' WSITruI{YJ iO 4DVIS JS4H-gIH flHJ

'WSIT7T{41WI a! 'app fuqf $}n {ooq E elora ueae ulue.I (t)'9 aEerl'4 anssg 9661.rdy4eq 'satug tqBN aqJ 1g')

'sse4roJ

B ery l11nq q ueq8uppN u! sasluerd sll leqt Jailra luerrnt eql plol eunospau.roJul uv'ulu1pfl q .ra1u.ud rya1 .reg .rofeu aql q peTuIrI ssar6 lassrX (7)

'uns aql raprm (aq,*raq1o puu 4uqla) [1uou1ut,irela pue rusFouel Jeqlo pue VUI Jo s.ragoddns 'luaue,lou lelrxesoruoqpasguflro aqlpapnleq ssefuBl sllJo qualdpaX'uopuequ,(u8 qlpr sasnst 1sRIaIo1 ,tauou 1no pe11op qJlttrtr JTO peluau"Iun pue pagudap 6uo1 aql se^r esuas-uou Jo Uos sFIt Jo ,{ep,{aq ary r(auou ,s.ra,{udxu1 pue ,s.ra,(eda n pseg (I)

slsllslros s5fBpolfv{ool resolJ v :ueaas refduqc

al/\srlvrcos H3oNn t/loc=r3Hr


(unsuccessfully) as part of a campaip to evict the British National Party fromits headquarters (which was based in the same area). But a report in the localprcss after the resultant trial made it clear that the white youth who wasconvic.ted of Duggal's murder was not motivated by racial hatred. Ihe murderuas simply a tragicn gang-related knife attacli, which of course is small comfortto the family. lNews Shopper, March 3, 1993, page 41.

$q TEIE CASE FOR SOCALISM: WHAT THE SOCULIST WORKERSPARTY STANDS FOR, by Paul Foot, published by the Socialist Workers Party'Iondon, (July 1990)' page ljt.

(15) Again,I don'twant to give the impression that I am whiterrashingeithercapitalists or capitalism, and I am certainly not putting down the tradesunions. Without trades unions as well as bourgeois reformers and othersr thelot of the working man (and woman) would be very much harder than it istoday. But, rrnlike the trades unions, socialists are not interrcsted in improvingthe lot of the workers, instead they are interested in destroying the old order'imperfect as it is, and replacing it with a new order of their onm, one which notonly produces wealth far less efriciently if at all, but which creates and subjectsboth the bourgeoisie and ordinary working people to naked tyranny.

(16) Foot, THE CA,SE FOR SOCULISM,page 14, (op cit).(17) Foot" T'HE CASE FORSOCULISM,page62, (ibid).(1E) A discussion of the Social Credit theories of Major Douglas would take

us far afiel{ so cannot be raised here. In 1994 the Social Credit Secretariat(KRP Pubtications) published three slim booklets on the theme of SUSTAIN-ABLE PROSPENTywhich outline the reforns necessary to correct the faultsof the capitalist system. The interested reader should refer to these as aspringboard for further rcsearch.

(19) Foot, TIIE C,,4'SE FORSOCULISM,page62S, (op cit).(20) There is a grain of truth in Foot's claim that the rich rip off the poor' but

this is due entirely to the nature of the debt-based money system, ie the palmentof interesl The fault and corrrcction of this system (usury) lie way beyond thescope of the prcsent work, but in any case, meaningful linancial reforn is asubject no socialist has ever expressed the slightest interest in bringing abouL

(21) In reatity increased efficiency, and probably to some extent, increasedcompetition.

(22) See ttre reports imtheTirnes, June 1, 1995, pages 1 & 25.

166


Q3) MPs to quiz gas chief over pay, by Patrick Donovan and Stephen Bates,published in the Guardian, December 16, lgg{rpage 1.

(24) According to Whitakers' Almanack, 1995, a Circuit Judge receivesf,69,497; a Senior CircuitJfiSeES2$41; while Recorders arepaid f,332 perday.

(2t AII fhis and more is discussed by Quigley in TiagedyAnd Hope, (op cit),see in particular Chapter X.

(2Q It is, or should be, common knowledge, that most judges actually take apay cut when they arrc called to the bench. A good QC does not relish the paycut such a promotion brings. It is said to be virtually impossible to bribe aBritish judge.

(27) See Chapter Four under Socralism And The Rule Of Law.(28) A note here on the wealthy. In past centuries, scienffic research uas

caried out largely bywealthy anateurs. Even today there are still some of themaboul For example, Edward Goldsmith, founder and former editor of TheEcologist magazine, has spent the greater part of his life working to conservethe environment- I have met Goldsmith a few times, and his is obviously alabour of love; just as obviously his work has been heavily subsidised out ofhis oum pockel It goes without sayng that in FauI Foot's cloud cuckoolandparadise nobodywill have the means to carry out such work, aad aslhingwillbe subsidised which the state does not approve of. (See also pages 10-1).

(29) One is rcminded here of the oldjoke about Leonid Brezhnev. His mothervisits him in the Kremlin and he shows her round his automobile collection:This is myRolls; this is myMercedes; this is myCadillac", he says.She replies,This is all very nice my son, but what will happen to you if the Commrrnistsget in?"

(30) Quigley, Tiagedy And. Hope,page 889, (op cit).(31) It is, I thint fair to say that special constables are often despiseil by

cerntain sections ofthe public, and even by certain sections ofthe police force.Lifeboahen and mountain rrcscue volunteers perform at times thankless anddangerous tasks.

(32) See for example SOCIALIST STUDIES NO. 16, (undated but publishedearly 1995), page 15.

(33) A particular nasty domes1l" sxample of this is the monthly magazineLabour Left Biefing * which calls itself "the voice of Labourrs inrlependentunrepentantleft'. lbny Blair certainly has no friends here.

167


* FormerlyZ abour Bifing or sinply Biefing,and originally London LabourBnfing.

(34) SOCUUST STWIES NO. 16, page 1, (op cit).(35) According to his entry in the Encyclopedia Americana, the Russian

edition of Lcnin's collected works was published under the title PolnoyeSobraniye Sochineni.

(3O While most socialists (and many otlers) are totally ignorant of thisr€ality, the SPGB is noL The current uriter knows this fron personal corne-spondencel the SPGB, while not ignorant, appear to be wilftttly blind.

(37) Notwithstanding the fact that many of them end up paving the road toHell with their good intentions.

ChapterEighfi A Straight LookAtBolshevism In Practice

(1) Shubr Zenlz, (op cit), pages 16-7. According to Shub, Lenin swore he wouldmakeihem pay for this.

(2) Theword Bolshevik actually means mqiority; Menshevik means minsff5r.

Q) Shub,knin, page lii1, (op cit).(4) Kun ras actually executed in 1937, as a thotslcyite. According to his entry

in the Encyclopedia Arnericana, he was later rehabilitated. The idea thatsomeone can be rehabilitated posthumously is novel to say the least It isdoubtful if Commrrnism eyer had a more faithful servant than B6la Kun; if thisis the nay the Reds treat their most devoted proselytes, you can imagine howthey treat the corlmon people.

(g Shub, Lenin,pagel22, (op cit). [I have relied largely on David Shub'sbiography because, although it shows Lenin and his fellow enemies of humanityin an ertrenely bad light, it is far from hostile. Shub took part in the 1905Revolution, andrvas exiled to Siberia. He lnewlenin personallyl.

(O Shub,Ienin,page U2, (ibid).(7) Shub, Ienin, page 115, (ibiil).

168


(E) there is evidence that some wealthy Jews did finance Hitler, thoughobviously for their orm nefarious pur?oses rather than out of misplacedidealism as with the likes of Morozov And, the protestations of OrganisedJewry and their fellow travellers aside, the Zionist movement did cooperate(and indeed collaborate) with the National Socialists. Ihis is thoroughlydocumented but will not be discussed here.

(9) Shub, Iez in, page t22, (op cit).(10) Shub,tenin,page 179, (ibid).(11) Shub,leninrpage I23, (ibid).(12) I hope this doesn't sound unduly apologetic, but the point should be

taken.(13) Shub,Zeninrpage 126, (op cit).(14) Shub, Z enin, page 61, (ibid).(1O Re the alleged Jewishness of Stalin, se€ for example FRAWWENT

CONVERSIOM The Myh Of Moscow's Change Of Heatt, by Colin Jordan,published by the Britons, London, (1955), page25. Ihe Nazis also suspected&at Stalin was Jovish at one time.

Ihe alleged Jewishness of l*nin may not be anti-Semitic propaganda, buta gen 'ine nistalre; he had a speech defect which uas somewhat rcminiscent ofa Jewish accent in Russian, lWorld lewry: THE REVIEW OF THE WORLDIEWISH CONGRESS,May lfl2,Yolume Xf, Number 2, page 101.

(1O Lilce a plague bacillus, as Churchill put it.(17) The actual quote is "It is hue that liberty is precious - so precious that

it must be rationed.' fThe Penguin Dictionary of Twmtieth-century Quotations,byJM. and MJ. Cohen, published byViking London, Revised and expandededition, (1993), page 2291.

(18) Shub, Z enin, page !77 , (op cit).(19) Shub, I enin, page 310, (ibid).(20) Af the trial of the staff of Belsen camp, one of the claims made by the

defence nas that Regulation 18b under which fascists and other opponents ofthe war had been intenred, violatnd.habeas coryus.

(21) Shub,Ienin,page 414, (op cit).(22) Shub, I enin, page 312, (ibid).(23) Shub,Zenin,page3l3, (ibid). [Eventually of course Soviet Comnunism

collapsed" literally, but Shub's claim - made in the 1966 edition of his Leninbiography - held right up until the era ofGlasnost and Perestroikal.

169


(24) Shub, tenin, page 359, (ibid).(25) Shub, L enin, page 360, (ibid).(2O Shub, t enin, page 406, (ibid).Q7) lerthatman exists for himself and not for others. Recall thotslcy's dictum

that he rvho does not obey shall not eat.(28) Qurgley, Tiagedy And Hope, page 387, (op cit).(29) Shub,Zeninrpages 408-9, (op cit).(30) Shub, Zenin, page409, (ibid).(31) Shub, Z enin, pages 409-10, (ibid).(32) Shub, lmin, page 411, (ibid).(33) Shub, lenin, page 411, (ibid).(34) Shub,Zenin,page 412, (ibid).(35) On the death of Lenin Zinoviev, Kamanev and Stalin kept lbotslry out of

power, lSchwarz, You Can Tiast The Communists,page 44, (op cit)].(3O Quieley, Tiagedy And Hope, page 396, (op cit).(37) Qurgley, Tiagedy And Hope, page 396, (ibid).(38) Quigley, Tiagedy And Hope, page 387, (op cit).Q9) I Believed, by Douglas Hyde, published byWilliam Heinemann, London,

(1950), page 84. Hyde nrote his book after leaving the Communist Party andconverting to Catholicism. Althoug! one should always be wary of people whoturn on ideologies and friends they once cherished, Hyde's book has the ringnot onlyoftruth but of sincerity, of a manwho realises that hewas once blindedbythe light

(n) NAflONAL SUICIDE: Military Aid to the Soviet Union, by Antony C.Suffon, publishedbyArlington House, New Rochelle, NarYork, Fourth print-i'9, (Juoe lfl4)rpge 17. The author is quoting from U.S. State DepartmentDecimal File, 033.1161 Johnston, Eric/6-3044: Tblegran June 30, 1944.

(4I) The BestEnany Money CanBuy,by AntonyC. Sutton,ForewordbyGaryNorth, Ph.D., published by Liberty House Press, Billings, Montana, (1980,pages 16-7.

(42) Sutton, The Best Enemy Monq Can Buy, page 32, (ibid).(43) Sutton, The Best Enemy Monq Can Buy,page7i, (ibid).(44) Suffon, The Best Enemy Monq Can BuyrpageT9, (ibid).(a$ This applies not si-ply to the former Soviet Union but to all socialist

dictatorships; Cuba is a most notable example.

170


(4Q A far morc sinister philosophy than even Manism is tle so-called GrcenMovemenf whose genocidal pronouncements make it clear that they do indeedwant to take us back to the Stone Age, and to exterminate the greater part ofnankind in the process.

(47) MY LIFE: An,4ttempt at an Autobiography, by kon thotslcy, publishedby Charles Scribner's Sons, NewYorlq (1930), page270.

(zE) Sutton, Antony C: WalI Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, published byArlington House, Nerv Rochelle, N.Y., (1y74). See in particular pages 22-4.

(49) In The Sk Million Reconsidered, tle anti-Semitic authorWilliam Grim-stad publishes a still from an early American film, My Official Wfe; one of theactors shonm bears more than a passing resemblance to totslry.

(50) totslsy's autobiography spells Negro with a small 'n'.(51) thotsky, My Lrfe,page272, (op cit).(52) Ibotsky, My Life,page274, (ibid).(53) It should not be forgoffen that the Russian revolutionaries of the time

held their conferences in London. Tsday, many Ieft wing parties, pnessuregroups and other organisations arc, if not well-funded, then certainly muchbetter funded than most of the (few) organisations devoted to tle promotionof capitalism. For example, although it is quite well-funded in tbe UnitedStates, in Britain the Ubertarian movement is run literally on a shoe string.

(54) totsky, My Life,page277, (op cit).(55) lhotsky, My Life,page?70, (ibid).6A r'HE REVOLUflON BETRAWD: ItrHAT IS THE SOVIET UNION

AND WHERE IS IT GOING?, by Leon thotsky, Ihanslated by Max Eastman,publisheil byDoubleilay, Doran, Garden City, N.Y., (1937). h this boolglhotskyrails at Stalh, but, as stated, the only real differcnces between Stalin's andtotsky's brands of socialism are purcly tactical.

(57) totslry, The Revolution Betrayed, page 15, (ibid).(58) thotsky, The Revolution Betrayed,pages 106-7, (ibid).(59) thotsky, The Revolution Betrayed,page 65, (ibid).

171


Chapter Nine: More About The Media

(1) There are actually two photographs ofthis scene, taken a few secondsaparL

Q) MAKING PEOPLE DlMPPEllRenamazing Otronicle of PhotographicDeception, by Alain Jaubert, published by Pergamon-Brassey's IntemationalD,efense Publishers, Inc, Mcl-ean, Virginia, (1989)' pages 30-1.

This bookwas first published as Ie commissariat anx atchives: Les photos

ry.i fatsifient I'histoire, by Editions Bemard Barrault, Paris' (1986). Althoughthey are not widely publicised, therc are a few such studies of fake photographs;this one is trulyexcellenl

(3) The definitive work on the subj ectis Katyn,by Louis FitzGibbon' publish'erl by the Noontide Press,Ibmance, California, $nr.It is subtifled.A CimeWithout Parallel.

(4) FitzcibbonrKntyn, (ibid)' see the frontispiece.(5) Jaubert, Making People Disappear, page E9, (op cit). Briefly, the Katp

massacre was uncovered by the German authorities' who published a 330 pagercport on itin 1943: The fficial Statement Concerningthe Mass Murdcr at Katyn.Ituas proved conclusively that tie men were murdered between April 1940 andSeptember 1941. That notwithstanding, the Americans, including Roosevelfcovered up for the Soviets at Nuremberg who tried to pin the blame onHemann Goering. In September 1976 a pslrrrmspf vas errccted in London tothe victims. For the full, grisly story the reader is referred to FitzGibbon'sboolgl{ntyn, (op cit).

(O One can add to this the compliance, venality, spinelessness and outrightcomuption of Westein governments, but again, this is an argument for thediffusion of power - ie the limifing of the power of govemment in the lielil ofcommunications - rather than the opposite.

Q) laufurL, Making People Disappeor, page 96' (op cit).(8) KRUSHCHET/ ruLK CITED SruLIN PLOT AGATNST MOLOTOI4

U.S. HAS THE TEXE.., published in theNeH/ YorkTirnes, LATE CITY EDI-TION, Monday, June 4, 1956, page 1; the article continues on page 3 asKRUSHCHEV ALK CITED SruLIN PLO T.

(9) Schuarz, Wa Is Communism?, (op cit).

172


(10) Not the paper's quotes.(II\ KRUSHCHEV TALK ON STALIN BARES DEru]LS OF RULE BASED

O N TERRO R: CIIARGE S PL OT F OR KREMLI N PURGE 5..., by Hamison E.Salisbury published in the New York Times, June 5, 1956, LAIE CITY EDI-TION, page 1. The references to Stalin's ignorance of agriculture and hisparanoia arrc taken from page 12; the whole of this page was devoted to thisand rrclated articles, understandably; this u,as a massive story at the time. Ibassist comprehension no further footnotes will be given; if the reader isinterestedin furtherstudyhe should consult theNew YorkTirnes forboth days,June 4 & 5, 1956. In England, tlis newspaper is held at Colindale, and in theUnited States it is, presumably, available in most major reference libraries.

(12) Schwarzr'Ilhat Is ComrnunismT, (op cit).(L3) NevlYo*Times,June 5,1956, (op cit).(14) Jaubert, MakingPeople Disappear, (op cit). [This quote is taken from the

Preface by Dn Roy Godsonl.(15) This maybe true if one takes an extrrcmely liberal definition of wary one

should never forget that the socialists are forever at war with the capitalistsystem. At least, nost of them think they are.

(1O Jaubert" Making People Disappea4 page 175, (op cit). The author givesseveral examples of such fakery effected by the "good guysn during World WarTivo. During the vnar, the British had an entire departuent devoted to blackpropaganda, and ofcourse, theyweren't the only ones.

(17) The reader is referred in the frrst instance to Forged War Cirnes MalignThe German Nation, by Udo Walendy, published byVerlag liirVolkstum undZeitgeschichtsforschung D4973 MothoAileser, (1979).

(1E) One leading Libertarian told the currentwriter that if it hadn't been forthe Intemet, Waco would have been totallywhitewashed, or even hushed up. Ifthe reader truly believes such a cover-up couldn't happen in the West then hesimplyhasn't done his homeworli.

(19) As indeed it was.(20) At the time of writing, ie August 1995.(21) Although I have never actually seen any, I believe this story to be true,

but bomb manuals and similar publications can be obtaineil by other means.(22) My researches, which have admittedly been superficial, led me to believe

that this game did not actually exist, although I am informed by a fellowIntemet user that it does.

173

NLI

'l! ul pereedde,tgenlce I {u$ll l6uop I hI uo Ua ps aqf raus IqEnoq1p puu ',{cuaEu uu q8no:q; !.ro,n s,,tep auo 1oE,{Fo I pJoJer eqf Jod (62)

'a1doad,(ueu 1ra.6 u;o spooqla^Ilaql of selnq.r.quoe pue 61.ro,lryo pap 1ua.r8 e salu.rauaE,(1sno! qo ums sno .-oueue qens 8ulpuads 'e4eur o1 sadoq,(ueduoc aq1 ,tauou aqt tno.g Uudy '(1ry1 aq1q roHIlE 6Z:f Eupnleur) ep! rplJo,rauolruru gg1;f 01 sun.r uu.t6o.rd. 96 smopulrylareu sfl qtunel ol lJosorc!tr J,tq paleeole ptpnq 3u-rq1.ra,rpe eql lertrl peu1eltsu,n 1; '9661 'gg lsn8ny uo Joqfne aqf ,tq prueq Fsrpsorq olpe.r B uI (82)

'(1;r do) '619 a8ed'4ua7iqnqg (77)'palaauorun aql Jo e;paru aq1 Eqssa.rppp uaq r plpusJ prlt

aq ol lou qtnoua eslr trs slsllepos lsou q8noqlp taplnu Eupnpul (99)'lr unJ lsntuluarnrue,ro8 aq1 leguasse

sI aJli-ras E asnBreq lern anJl 1ou,(1du;s s! lI'suolleuop ap,rgd,tq,{la,rgsnpxapapnnJ s7 g'saguot1c:eq1o ,tueu qlpn 'puu ',{1peqa e tnq atlaras a3u,q:du,{1uo lou s! uopn1psuJ luoqeJlrl luuolluN pr(oa aql latr'erlares luoqaJ;1 eqltsa,q1 ,tueur sa.res .rua,t,ira e qJIq euo sI eJI Jas plpr,{1aue.rga .reqlouy GZ)

',iqsnpu1 etsJ pel"uluop-f spru?W eq1,tq pa,toldua,(la,rpcaga$ou ueeq q8norp ssq 11 's1spcre61,{q ,(1du;s 1ou pue 'uge8e arn$ pus eull pasnesuesuou Jo 1.ros slql uees a^Eq a,11 'uogsse.rdxa ee{ of 7q611t notEu;,(o.rlsap,tq eJ 'rga 'ua.rpgqr 'sap!.roulu Jluqp t aro.rdq pasn eq Upr qJIqAr uo;1e1s@1 o1snladu; a,rp pE" slJef s.tq dn d;pr o1 palua,r,ug s1 'nrnasneu pe'sEulr agqdopoed'segce.rldsuor !z"N - lsxa lusaop qr$Ur - uelqo.rd aqtr, '1euJelEJ eql Jo uollul-n8a.r11o.r1uor epls s! - wle pansap eql sI teql - uopnlos eql 'ua1qo.rd aq1 efBi].Dp.rg no,{'uopnlos eq1 ag 6a8ureqt,Qossacaulnoqe Eqr.rq ol rapro u!',tUa.r.rg (lZ)

uerpllqt ["erJosqdu.foloqd auarsqo a{Bl ol peuIIJuI ssel aq ru$,taqf sql op uee sa1;qdopaedJ! esnereq '1uaudo1a,rap B qJns aruoJlea plnoqs ,t1p;radsa ec11od aq1 1uq14ro1gd sq1 ol Jnmo l.uprp f,lquqord 11 'salsufusJ{r1s .r;aql atppq {qaraql pueueruo^rJo selpoq eql tro rrarpMrJo seceJ eql asodugadns ppoa sagqdopeed',fflo1ouqra1u.repou qtlapq1 '.rarg;o aeglod e,{q lsau.ree u.rpJB,n roJlnd leql sunu.rod .ralnduoc ;o dgqs.rosuar aql JoJ sluaun8 re prnsqu lsoru aql Jo auo (gZ)

ansnvtcos HsctNn ]/IooSSHJ


Chapter Ten: Monopoly, MarketingAndEmployment

(1) There is also such a thing as monopsony, where the market is dominatedby one buyar, usuallytte govemment.

(2) See page 66.(3) Qutgley, Tiagedy and Hope, page 452, (op cit).(4) ManufacturersforceAsdato end discounts on S0vitantrls,, byNeil Buckley,

published in the Financial Times, October 26, 1995, page 20.(O See for example the excellent study The Health Conspiraqt: How Doctors,

The DruglndustryAndThe Govemment Undermine OurHealth, bythe londonpharmacist DrJoe Collier, published by Century Hutchinson, London, (1989).

(Q \\e Financial Tirnes ar1,icle (referred to in this paragraph) also mentionsthe Sainsbury supermarket chain, which had also been discounting vitamins.

(7) Re Qurgley, see note 3 above. In his 1.776 classic, The Wealth Of Nations,the great free market economist Adam Smith wrote that "People of the sametrade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conver-sation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raiseprices.n

(8) One of the expressions we often hear in this connection is tle "balance oftrade"; Britain is said to have an unfavourable balance of trade with Japan,whatever that means. In reality, the morewe export, the harderwe have towork,and the more we import, the more foreigp.ers do the work for us. The Japanesehave long imposed heavy tariffs of their own while continuing to exportmassively. Ihis is portrayeil by the media as some sort of nefarious Orientalscheme to undernine the West; the reality is that we benefit from this at thecost ofJapanese workers, who are subsidising our cheap electronic imports.

(9) On tariffs, the reader is referred to Protectionism and the Destruction ofProspuity,by Murray N. Rothbard, in THE FREE MARKET READER Essaysin the Econonrics of Liberty, Edited by Ltewellyn H. Roclnrell, Jr, published byThe Ludwigvon Mises Institute, Burlingame, Califomia, (1988).

175


(10) The lapanese Conspiraqt: The Plot to Dominate Industry Worldwide - andHow to Deal with 1r, by Marvin J. Wolf, published by New English LibrarySevenoaks, Kent, (19M). This bookwas first published in 198i3t.

(Ll) Daily Express, October L7,1933, page 10.(12) Ile reader should recall Professor Quigley's comments about an al-

liance between organised labour and capital: "a cooperative effort by unionizedworkers and monopolized industry to exploit unorganized consumers by rais-ing prices higher and higher to provide both higher wages and higher profi ts..."[Quigley, Tiagedy And Hope, pages 380-1, (op cit).] Ihis is exactly whathappens in practice, businessmen and trades unions demand the erection oftarilfs to protect their own vested interests at tle cost of consumers. It mattersnot that this alliance is unspoken.

(13) Hayelq THE ROAD TO SERFDOM,pages 69-70, (op cit).(14) An excellent example of this is Malcolm Skeggs, a former time-serving

member of the National Fbont who, although not a membe4 currently runs theBritish National Party's mail order book service. Skeggs was a librarian whohad been employed by the loony left London Borough of Lewisham for twenty-two years. He was evenfually dismissed for the sort of technical offence thatalmost any librarian in the world could have been dismissed for.

(15) te, it may go out of fashion, a board game based on a TV series forexample.

(16) Which may have been true, but there are ways around this besides takinglegal action. LTimes article published June 28 ,L994 [Wy 'slavery' is fairtrade,by Pahick Ishenroodl, made the point that "All recording agreements are, bydefinition, restrictive on an artist's frcedom by virtue of their exclusivity.'

17) Losers in the legal lottery, by Frances Gibb, published in the Times,September 6, l994rpage 35.

(1E) The Times, June 22,1994, pages 1 & 3. No, tlat is not a misprint; theruling ranto273 pages.

(19) The Times, June 22, 1994, pages 1 & 3, (ibid).(20) Many people who are diagnosed as epileptic may not be adversely

affected at all in their chosen professions, but ifa fighter is so diagnosed - inthis country at least - his career is over. Similarly if he has a tendengr to cutround the eyes his ciareer may be shortened or even ended. And so on.

(21) In case you have never seen a picture of King, he looks as though he hasbeen connected to a Van der Graafgenerator.

176


(22) Fhank Warren interview in Boxing Monthly, January, 1995.(23) According to the patent inquiry desk at the British Library Holborn

(who harl dealt with this inquiry before!), Professor Rubik patented his cubein Hungara as long ago as January 30, 1975, (although the Rubik cube crazedidn't peak in Britain until 1981).

Q4) R"rbikpuzleforthe judges, by David May, published intheSunday Times,September 29, 1981, page 3.

Q5) New Scienfiif, April 18,1992, page 23.(2O As long as Man exists in his prrcsent fotm.(27) This is a vast subject but the case for minimum wages is advanced

primarily by special pleading. The Labour Party's recent lack of ardour forsuch proposals is tantamount to an admission of this.

(28) We can omit such unplotable variables as special discounts to friends,favours, idealism, etc.

ChapterEleven: From Hell OnEarthTo Pie In Slqy

(1) Shub, Lenin, page 450, (op cit). Shub credits this to Lenin in ColleaedWorl<sYolX\[I. The English edition of Ienin's collected works -which coversthe period L9L0-2 - does not contain this quote, at least not at this particularpage. And, frankly, I have rea6 sn6ngh, too much, of Lenin, Stalin and lbotslcyalready, and have neitler the time nor the inclination to read anymore.

Q) Shab, Lenin, page 139, (ibid).(3) Shub,Zeniz, pages 450-1, (ibid)(4) See in particular Krushchev's condemnation of Stalin as reported on

pages 62-3.(5) In the Far East many Japanese were also put on trial.(q ADVANCE TO BARBARISM: The Development of Tbtal Warfare Front

Serajevo to Hiroshirna, by RI.P.Veale, published by the Institute for llistoricalRevieq Torrance, Califomia, (1979), page 31. Stalin made this proposal in allearnest at the Tbheran Conference. [For the record., the frrst edition of this

177


excellent book nas published in 1948 under the pseudonym A. Jurisl Thisrevised and expanded edition is published as part of a two vslrrms setz TheVeale File.It has forewords by the Very Rev Wlliam Ralph Inge and the Rt.Hon. Lord Hankey. The second volrrme is called Crimes DiscrealyVeiledl.

(7 ) Yeale, A dv an c e Tb B arb ai s m, page 223, (ibid).(8) THE BOOK OF THE FALLACV A training manual for intellecual sub-

venives, by Madsen Pirie, published by Routledge & Kegan Paul, London'(1985), pages 158-9.

(9) On the grounds that if you argue from false premises with the mostflawless logic, you must inevitably reach a false conclusion.

(10) Robertson cites Engels thus from }lis Anti-Dtihnng: "Butterflies, forexample, spring from the egg through a negation of the egg...[but] ifwe take...adahlia or an orchid: ifwe treat the seed and the plant which grows from it asa gardener does, we get as the result of this negation of the negation not onlymore seeds, but also qualitatively better seeds [anrl] each repeated negationof the negation increases this improvementn. Make of that what you will; thisquote is taken from The Dispossessed Maioity, by Wilmot Robertson, SecondRevised Edition, Fourth Paperback Printing, published by HowardAllen' CapeCanaveral, (L97A, page 349. Robertson is wrong on one poinft the fact suchHegelian gibberish is regarded so highly by a large segment of nankind doesnot mean that it is not utterly ludicrousl nonsense is nonsense regardless ofhow many people may believe in it. Or how few.

(Ll) The Penguin Dictionary of Twentieth-century Quotations,byJ.M. and M.SCohen, published by Viking, London, Revised and extrlanded edition, (193),page228.

(12) Cohen & Cohen, The Penguin Dictionary of Twentieth-century Quotations,page228, (ibid).

(13) Shub, Zenin, page 3L0, (oP cit).(14) This raises all sorts of issues which we cannot discuss here and would

indeed fill many volumes, eg what is freedom, what right does the state have tointerfere in the fanily, to what extent can children be said to be free, shouldinsane persons be detained against their wills, etc.

(1O This does not mean that theywill have a right to be liked.(1O The Labour Party Constitution of 1918 reatls in part "(d) To secure from

the producers byhanil or by brain the full fruits of their industry, and the mostequitable distribution thereof that may be possible' upon the basis of the

T7B


common orvnership of the means of production..." ft HISTORY OF THELI4,BOUR PARW FROM 1914, G.D.H. Cole, published by Routledge & KeganPaul, London, (1948), page727.

(17) The self-styled nanti-fascist" magazine Searchlightwas not amused.(18) At the start of the 1950s, the Daily Worker had an ABC circulation of

tl5,24l; it sold for a penny halfpenny - pre-decimal! ITHE NEWSPAPERPRES S DIRECTORY andAdvertisers' Guide 195 l,ptblished by Benn BrothersLtd" page lU. By the start of the 1990s, the Moming Sfals circulation hadrlropped to around 8500. IBENN'S MEDIA DIRECTORY,I99I, page 881.

(19) T'HE WRTUE OF SELFISHNESS: A New Concept of Egoism, by AfnRand, with additional articles byNathaniel Branden, published by Signef NewYork, (December 1964), page 88.

(20) There is a saying that90Va ofthe scientists who have ever lived are alivetoday. I have no iilea if this statement is true or if it was true when it uas made,or eyen except in a very general sense when it was made, but the point shouldbe taken, ie that there arc vast numbers of scientists, and that most of themmust of necessity be engaged in very narow fields of research.

(21) This diagram is taken from The Three Principles of the People, by Dr. SunYat-sen, Abridged from the translation by Fbank W. Price, published by ChinaFublishing Company, Tbipei, (1981), page 110.

Q2) Except through pressure groups and lobbies, who are often successfulin bringing about legislation to protect or expand their onm particular vestedinterest at the expense ofthe general public, eg tariffs.

(23) Quoted in the New York Times, January 26, 1936, page 36.(24) Cited in The lron Curtain Over Ameica, by John Beaty, published by

Wilkinson, Dallas, (195L), page 161.QS) N ew York Time s, J aanary 26, 1936, page 3 6, (op cit). Alfred E. (Al) Smith

(1873-l9M) was the Governor of NewYorkand a former DemocraticNomineefor President He made these renarks in a speech delivered on January25 atthe first annual banquet of the Anerican Liberty League.

(26) Beaf, The lron Curtain OverAmericarpageL62, (op cit).(27) MR. FRANIAU PHILOSOPHER UDEAR, SENTIMENAL ENG-

LlsEl'rpublished in the Daily Express, March 24,1933,pa9e2.(28) See for example the 1990 sfiidy, Chickengate, by Richard North and

Tbresa Gorman MP(29) Most people call this taxation, Libertarians call it thefL

179


(30) For an excellent introduction to the nonsense of the EPA and the way ithas misused its Draconian powers under the guise of protecting the environ-men! the reader is referred to the briefing paper "/IDy'K SCIENCE' INACTION: CNNCAL NOTES ON THE EI,TWRONMEI{TAL PROTECNONAGENtr (EPA), by Chris R.Ibme, publisherl by FORESI London, (June$n).

Chapter Tkelve: Race, SocialistMendacityAnd TheAppeal Of Fascism

(1) If this sounds unnecessarily paranoid the reader should remind hinselfthat the goal of many other ideologies and indeed of most religions is tosubjugnte all mankind. Therc is nothing eitler esoteric or sinister about this'indeed, any ideologr that is capable of persuading people to espouse it byrepresenting itself honestly, desenes to win converts.

(2) According to an article in the lewish Chronicle , December l7 , llRT , pages27-8, Mussert's party had about fifty Jervish members. An article published inThe Barnes Review forJune 1995 reported that by the time a ban was imposedin October 1938, the party had around a hundred and lifty Jewish members.

(3) And remains one! The Protocols is still in print, and has inspired a greatdeal of subsequent anti-Semitic literature.

(4) In August 193E, Ford was awarded a Nazi nedal to celebrate his 75thbirthday, the first American to receive such an award. The reader is referredto the excellent studies WHO FINANCED HITLER: The Secret Funding ofHitlels Rise to Power 1919-1933, by James Pool and Suzanne Pool, and toAntony Sutton's WriII Street and the Nse of Hitler, both of which cover Fordsinvolvementwith the Nazis.Ihere are a number of biographies of HenryFordwhich also cover his obsession with the Jewish Question, the most sipilicantbeing the 1980 study byAlbert L'ee,Henry FordAnd The lews.

(5) MSCISM IN BNruIN A History 191&1985, by Richard Thurloq pub'lished by Basil Blackrvell, Orford, (1987),page 52.

180

I8I

sB ?q8F1no peuuapuor [aru] pue 6pgdnls pus pilItp\, arear XIfg aqf pilIrslleoqlr sAef luqt paurs r 'g a8ud 'gg6l 'g pnSny Jo plto/fl tlstural at1;. (71)

'[71e8ed, 'Z€6I '0€ raqualdag 'a7c1uott73 qsr*a[eW q paqs[-qnd'AOITOJ ,SJSDSV1 gO NOIN1 HSImIg :us!fiuas-uav puo ta1soyryplD'$so ll.sl u'sn uo{ l33p a.renbS e eaeq s,(arqu IIFI seFreue qI uBql JeqfuJ.f4unoc slql e,ues oq,tr pue upllJfl Jo suaz$IJ p,(o1 a.ru oqitr s {af 's,naf eJs,(aq1 asnecaq saef {Jqle Ja^eu a111',ftlunor slqf uilI"ttrs ,tpuaoa.r e

"q qtlq,n

asoql sB qrns suollJusuerl IsJJueug leuollsuJalq u! pa8u8ua a.re,{aq1 oaqrr,(gunba m ,{gu; 1s;unuruoJ aqf Jo uopterlp eql sE qJns seg! Ilte a lsraaqnsug pa8etue a.re faql 31 saef {rsDB e,1l 'stspsud JO uolufl qsllFfl eqf Jo,b;1od aqlgo ged ou'a.roga.raq1 5s.r puu'uqcseg;o ensq ou s! usplues-lluyx4uertrelels Eqrno11ol eqf penssl ,{a1so1,q 'mg aCf ;o 8ugpunog slq uO (II)

'rruoJer lelJuBuu Jo alsJoapB,(gua puu Joilreaul tauno,{.rope; e'uoslgy JnIIFV sullt suolrrfl eql of ulqpernpo4ul oq,$ usw eql '1g1no Eqqsgqnd rp;uag-llus 1epuangug lnq 'puus u'suo1.r.rg aq; o13uop uaqq selr eq uaqar ,,es.r,rr-aafu auueaq,(1pnpu asarl (91)

'rZ6I raque oN pewrguoJ '1,761.reqo1r6 ,Z pessudz7761qBugee4 IBJauae .{.reu1p.roe.qxg uu 1u pes;rgBuv sear ertrBu aqtr, (6)

l,tep s,ueu.rg-ruolulT ssgt apeu,tlpalqnopun qcJqn'a1nps fsIrsBJ aql ua,rp puq EuDteqt 1eql paloda.r ansq SZ6I 'qlfl pn8ny aq1 !ue.6a1a1,tupq4q ,{ddeq u 8u.ryaql lues peq qJuerq spunupg 'lS,ftng aql leql enssl 9Z6I 'q1tr9 aunl s1.t u;pryodar slspsag qsaug aqt lo uo&tg Quo aq1 :Nng77l7g JSD SVf gHJ 8)

'S€6I NIff 6g padu4s sg 1; launl q4,ptry s! e g erllsnfJW eroJaq JapJo aql'9g6l ',(eW qfSZ parep sg uopgad aql ro1rDerJ u'uoqp11acn.rg .raqdotslJqJ .irua11yo uoprlad aql uo 'uogsplq ,trarueq3 'gnof, qBlHaq1 ug dn puno^r se,tt palFtrlrJ stslrsed qsppg aq,I '(,$eX 'acWO prottg tnqndeql ls ppq a.ru qe;q,n) s.raded Jg Jeuralq palpn5 ssq rellrar lrrar.rnt eu.r.

'puesnoql nal "

usql arou uaaq aasq Jaaau ppor ll 1nq'szndr-qs.raquau 1enpa eql lertr r Bep! ou a^eq I p; aao.rd ol spJEJ xepq eql pue's.requaw 690'0Zt peq eqs eup eqf ls asnsJaq rurop ulq parrnf aasq ol pIBs sIssmre-urofun' (pslrsed qqlgg aq1,(1.rau.ro;) qslrsuJ qspFg aqlJo re oelpleql roJ (fgfi ut) plq B apuu eacq ol pIBs sera,{e1sotr41 pls,rrso rls 'Sg6I 'BI

,irunuel.rog.radeds,naa ilatqaH uoJyaurveql ug paqsllqnd aIJpJB ue FI G)'gg a8ud'(tg6)'uopuol'$IHeoU

puu elr.lsg,(q paqqlqnd'sso.r3 u11o3,(q 'Nyiltrg NI SJSI1SVI gHJ O)

av\s|rvrcos uScNn v\oo33HJ

z8r

'a.Ia r areql lBql peu-rElt r{1sno!.res ueeq Jaae l! sBq Jou uespfl1e sJaqueqr set ,tue .ra,rau eJaa eJarIJ. 'sJaqrn"qo se8 s.uaqag ol peJJeJar g66ItZZ lsnftry rc1 topung uo guapuadapuT aq1 'aldusxa JoJ lduee uolfEulur.re;xeuB sE uaslag ol saruirJaJer 1euolsurro spug ilps auo'Sulpuulsrnprfou 1erf,L

'slqlgnbcu uealmoJ pue serueluas 1oe6,{1ua4 - (uaqag yo qr1;g eq1) asargunr{ pueJlesu.rq JauB{{ Eupnleu-r - suollntaxe ue^ala q palFsa.r 'zlpnqesngpue uespg lB pa$Iuuoc,{1pa8a1p se$lro.qu qf!,$parrJeruoJ serr qtq,rr '1e!4

eql rarrreJy luuprrertrrtro3 Supnpul 'sluepuagap St q4,$ St6I'1,1 .raqualrlaguo pauado 11 ',{ueu.rag 'iraqaunl lB JJE:ls ueslag Jo pleq sera IsFf V (6I)

'[941 a8utl '(U6f)'uo$Ipg puoras 'xassng 6uo1qft..rg'ssan;,napr,ag pego1sy1,(q paqsqqnd'drruua) qtaqua.4l aq1 lg mop a4Jl x

,-p.run8 pa.rnldec e 8u1;unq neqrsq 1e sreuosprd-xg, pauopdecSI I! EJEH'SdhIV) NOUWJN4)NO) IZVN TO NOAWaqIT gHJ ONVSNnNgI4M:JyVgH S1ODA gHJ gAISNI,{pnrs Sg6l s,Enzqy gaqoa;oy6efleiluo s.reedde osp (,tpua.ragp,(pqfl1s paueq) qde.doloqd euss e[.r.

'sse.r1sJp auos u1,{lsnoprqos! oq r prunt pepsrq ue Eqs 'ua1pg u Jaao Eugpuels selu&u! pa511an,{pua-.redde o^g sitaorls

"p.run8 SS uB asnqe safuuu! nsqreq pelsJaqlrl pauopdueqdu.foloqd y *'&ryua3 qtarJuatug aq1t6 nog arll {ro,ralsluols! EI prspusfss5t1 q 4nfl 'U'V ,tq ua,rp sJ slrlf Jo alduuxa 8u.q-r.r1s ,(pu1nc;gud V (BI)

'En0g/z.loagw alg erso prorru r[qnduI punoJ aq uue goda.r a8ed aa.rq1 s;q,L '8tZ['9 pafep s! pueJtrasu.rq elqqsuoJgaq3 aq|,{q pad;s sI stqt'8€61 ugurugAoN 9NftIr70 I'I4H sDNuEgwJSIJSVT-NNV ANV JSDSVI f,O JUOJW H)NVAq TM)qJS (LD

'psr or)

"HI GI)

'erlgo auo11 '1,g, Nnf rIfSZ pedue1s s! 14'591.,6ELZ0S qgEtZ/WlOH u! punoJ aq ust pu? a1g ettgo proJau rllqnd s sI slql 'saqtluJto zanaas-lJuV - uopuo7 'g u! saruoqrrust1 sauraqt'I UD to{ rycuno3 7ouo4o71 (p1)

u'sealesuaql slspsBtr,{a1sotr41aqf ers Eslrsul 1u}redu1 aq11sup8e 1q6g.rno ug s.rapoddns pa1ea.6

"mo 'aup luasa.rd arp fV. :snq1 'ueuraH 'V ',{feltos qs$af ,tflsra4un pJoJrO

eqlJo luaplsard eql papnb gg6l '67 .raqrualdas rc! apluonD qsr^apq1 (El)';ullossn4 rog p.rom poo8 e

puq eJtlgp errres erII u'qlleJ Jno Jo uatn lueJep 1e ,{q 's,tes ,{1n4 IUIH$IJ\rIfl

eu\sr'lvrcos u30Nn l/roc3suj

E8T

.I6LI

a8ud'(1661) troa.nap'asno11 uopusy,,{q paqqlqntl'a1u3 spm3 .{q qrua.qgeqf rtro{ patelsue-Il '1a.rag s;o5ue.rg-ueef ,(q 'uououuolu1to aty aqg u! IaraCIto 6tay aqt :HJntrJ WOV1 JHgI'1f, IHJI * ,'satot toua{ur.rpq1a,ruq 3oo1's{celq furg peJe orslp 1snfpeq ueu,f8.ra1o pauopuag!-Ilara s!q.f' :slueurtroa1a,reg '.ralq8nelJo sJBoJ qlpr palaa.r8 se,rr slqtr liJaqlo ,tue aqq 'sEu.req uurtrnqeJB suurulqJog eql - la8rog lou s.lql, pe{Jerua.r uorrrres e Squa,rqap uaqn.qq;rnup taoqpuV[ ug ueu.tEralc luelseford u"ur.reg V 'eloptaue Sqlroqoyaqf sal"Iar p,rag qo5uu.14-umf * 'qtru1uo,tg tqBUtr aqJ {ooq sH uI (92)

's.{u,nlsapou urorno q lI ol alnq!4uot olJoareql {tu1 .to ,{1;gqe rlno rno Jo ssalp.re8e.r '1u sn o16uo1aq ppoqs puu seop erue1lreqq qql'spnplAtpq pagS go :equnu IIBrtrs BJo sgoga aqf Jo {nsar aq1 ,{1.r.rerq.rd a.ru -,fflo1ouqca1 pue eJuelts r(pedpuFd -uollusll!^lrJo sluaua alqrs eql ?TperJ IElroS uo{ uil1uf t .-al B sl sltll GZ)

'punq-goru ertroJeq 8uo1 suq sqf nq 'rusqDnol atuo ss { pJo^r pa.r.ra;e.rd eq1. (tZ)

'[m1uar cJlsrl JoJ BJprrI u! {Jo^r prupusfs B sBA IaruBJ padrunq-auo aq1uo {ooq slH 'e4qsulotulT trI proJusls 1u ar.rpwd e dn Supps puu puupugo1 3uJu.m1a.r aloJaq sJIrW q pe Jas JaIBI pue 'ugpu1 go lueurr.ra^o3 aql ollqppadg larue3 palqodde senaq luogssayo.rd,(qp.r B sE Aesairl'eseaT plou.ry

"pserqsp$s"q,r"""ffi T; j?.lH:J;ff ,In?r"il,l,ff :;:;,!:;r:r.,[::] ' utsoor pelltFos ol lsnmopllpallsFos eql Jo aJu"^eleJ eql InoqB ue$Fra s! esuasuor Je$n lBq/h as![Bero1 6s,ne1'aq; aluuFrrJe$a ol ldua11u paapu! p1p srzeN erll fuqt ',(pua.redde'saop

apal su ldamu ol e sq lou seop euo' [ (1p do)'91 g eted.'tusyo qtog oJ axw^pv'alea1l ,:raEuup pue alqno4 alntnJJo acJnos u qlpnSuguapJo poqlau lu.rn1eupuB sno! qo eqf pareplsuoJ sB r SIBAIJ sll ol lualuaauotul s?!n IB !,uns asoqra.{;;.rou1u IBlJer E Jo uo$"ulrrrJe1xe eql serup luaIJuB trI 'etlpErd aapgu.uilol uolsJeaa.r e ,tldurs ta,ranoq 'sen 11 'spqu poz[! p o1 6q,$.u.roq suaas.rtrelqord rlslnaf eql Jo uo$nlos IBuId6 s.JalflHr l"ql ue$,r.I/n sBq el8ea (Iz)

'[(11e do) 'yg aBeil'&ryua3 qtal]uanll aW tO toop '4ngl ' dootd sepunoJu pa,reLr,tlyuuorsetro sarreJs qtns pug ilp$ no,{,(upo1 uela pus 'suopeu-g.rage yopotd epuetedo.rd sseu'a,lpeaga aql paln1ssuoe s.{e,np suq qolqiruaqag 'a,raqaq 1 's911,, luql ueilFra ssq zln{ JnqUV uErJolsIH tsluo1q,rqg (67)

el/\|srlvrcos u30Nn v!oc33HJ

vgr

,,'ela.qsFBE lerol aql s.aq 'pa,(oldEerm lou s.eH'slreaf ual q s,(Epual pa{ro r ttluo seq uulrueqeg auo,, us8aq qJlqlt' propuols Snuaag uopuorlew u.r ecgo ls!.rnotr surrruqe{ eql ,(q pacqd su,n luauas$Je,rpe aEed 1n;e'1661'6 .raquacaq uO 'seruuqufl aql sI aslpe.rud pusls! qtns pJIrIl v Og)

'rteme:parq

o1 1ou.{pu.ruleqa.re o palo^ Bpnur.rag go aldoad eILf, 'ulsl.ug uo.g acuapuad-epu! JoJ ldo ot spnrrrJefl pa^ro[u a uq plno,rt qtlqa unpuereJeJ B Jo eae eqluo se,n lroda.r s$11,'S66I '91 lsnEny '.roqpe aql,tq pmaq goda.r oJpsg O€)

'(1;c do) '9-1,1,1 sa8ed'aatg aqrlo aSopuog'ueBgals (Sg)\L6tl'.r

paqqlqnd,tlpup;.ro sam,tessa eql:Z-I9Z sa8ed uo.r; uilIBl sI alonb qry'(1pdo) (uonag

lo arloA aqJ 'pueg u! ttlopaarg puo n&ung tessa aql uo-1E (yg)'(pHD'1 atud'utslcot to slooy (gg)

.1aEut[,(33et)'uopuol 'suopulag ersg Jo elq.rpul aql ,(q paqslpnd 'uslcot p stooy @E)

;1spa .ra8uol ou,{aq1 a allaq ol a/tr eJsp,t'sc;.ra6,{q olul {,rl,slr2.l-!luer slroJql ,(epo; s.rnopo 1ultuJ Jo uopuau,tuy

't9-S6€ sa8ud'(4691)'uopuol'uanqla14i,{q paqqlqnd 'g'J'X 'uqsuqo1"11,tr.ru11.4g.{q 'IZgghItrZ gHJ gO HJSONg)NgN-If,NI HSUNq YqONN S7NOJNYTT gHJ TO NOUYOJ Y gOJN1OJJV 1WOS glg9 OJ JJW4JJV IW :oc1{y 7o4ua2 qsgygl n'uertro,nu! ueql ueu uI .ra8uo.r1s,(ppgar sl Jnopo eql'uH qlla rtrooJ pesolJ B u-rrr.rBrtral o1 a1q;ssoduJ q31u plr 1; Eugapuar 'aa.fap Sqleddu uu ol aalsuagosaullauos sg 1; o.6au peqlop eql ul-'uog.rsoduoc ug,{1go aroru pue Japu.rurulueJeglp B Jo aq ol aru of .reeddu ppon qrFI.$ lnq '1Bans q1.r r pepunoJuoJuego uoneJras B sauql fB epnxa qc;qn'q;d-u.ru aql rapun spuep eqf W rrpapeuuoJ aq o1 .ruadde plnoar laus o.r8au e^.rsuaJJo fsoru aq.r.'suuado.rng ugueql .rafue1 ,tpplrar a.re sa.rod aql pue',(1aa.g pue,fusua a.r.rdsad [sao.6ap],1uql aloJ^r trolsuqof ,ftleg JlS JotsJlslulupu FIuoIor eq; ',ftquer aql JoIIJn1 arll aloJaq,(ploqs ue$F r Brl{V pailorfuot-qslllJg Inoqe {ooq u q (1g)

'pallut eq of ̂rou are,taql se'4nu1 rO (0€)'Olql) '0S-6tI saBed.'uogo4gaz) snsraArag tlapual (69)

' (plqD' 7y1 eBeil' uopmlpn3 snsraArg tlapua; (gg)'gy1 aEed '(n11)'up.ro;ge3 'sala8ug so1 'ssan; eppuooN eql

,{q paqs;1qnd' O'qd'Ilapued reutfl fq' NOI;UZITil) SnSVgtl XSS (LZ)

awsFtvtcos HfoNn uIoctS3ul

s8r

'ua{sl aq pFoqs lqod eql nq6snoprqnlus anorn araq/rmuos ol aaortr of lrala 1a,n ,(eu,irago1 a1e1s aql sq,rr oqao.6atr1 E :iueq {Jora lB srofceJ rltuouore-opos ,(ueu e.re a.raql ,{lsnoprqo (0S)

'(plql)' gg7 eBeil,' aatg aq1 lg aSopuog'uaEgefs (6?)'(1;r do) '1-91,1 saEed 'aaq aq1lg aSopuog'wilgats (B?)

' 71 afled' ?66T' ZZ lcqoltg 3 saug aql u1 peqsqqnd',(a1ry uug fq'uautuoc 3u1po n! atnc pyo4oc n!!o spnpallau! wt!4V (w)

lBql p.rBspeq a lleAresuot eilq,lr s 3.r ,(qqol Jsllal.lllrre,,eqryo uol;cseJ aql auFanl $p) 'sa lI JlaqlJo JaaJ uI saa8ngar ale.radsap su Inq '(ado.rng

q sallq r-uougo.$po[uu Supulaq,n ralo aq1 se) s1uu.r6;ru Jlrtrouora s" lou pagpuq,{aq1 qe1q,n uoq,f.rlunot e ol {rsq paddqs puu saqJeor oluo pa,roqs pnf'staqutot1t suS lnoqe ser:a1s,(q ou'a.raq s1salo.rd anfer1 IZBN IIEV oN'{tgq luasptrB saqtuoJ oluo pepaoJe ,{1p.ra111 alan,tery'9651 lsn8ny u! arlBZJo fuetn-rualo8 aq1,{q suupuurag Jo uo.rlq.qedar aqf sE r $prf tJuo4 JergotrV (St)

. V 661, EZ fpr l ..ot1t o21 t s llDu o S (W)'arn|nJ alqsinseroJ eql JoJ lou lssel

1e 'uadduq lou m,rr ll os 'asuesuou rluepsJe-opnasd;o Jarmertr 1e pue tro,naeglod .re,roc.rapun 'suolsnc tupnpul 'unop u.ro1 aq ppo,r{ sa.qdue Jo lol e'uaddeq ol ara,lr sIrpJI'lq8lrrJaao suospd eqt f,ldwe fgeng;,rppo,n sJrys8n rpp.ruq SuJpnlruJ 6sEn.rp aqpEal of aq p1no r aur.rrt u! sslq rluqfe pasoddns;oualqo.rd aq1 ap1e4 o1 r(en lsaq aql os 'pa1u 1a.r-Bn.rp q auln {rEIq Jo fol V (gt)

'Sqpdde q eulrr lualo$ {tBIq uo rpqq,(lugegac'a;annrce,(1quqo.rd q 11 la.req/ruaqueuar luea 1 q8noql oo11m..rd u-r lI ueas e Bql'pooH aqJ 71 ztog w1gS aqt q treams aql uo paqseg sE r rgsll"fs s$trtr (Zt)

'suos8arJo

Jatrrrurtr IIBToJ peJnpuJnuertr 1nq palgoldxa,tpo 1ou are seurFo qrns ,lroq o;u!1q6;sq egunp,te sa,rlF qegqn'ncuauVq samog auy) apg:i.IO/LlgNAV)palpe,{pn1s enbgn u paqqlqnd ssq xorM\ pJ.r"rl rluepsru usrrrertrV eql'(uaaag .raldeqJ ol gI alou aas) 'aldwuxa .ro; te8Enq lIqoUJo reprnu aqf, (It)

'lglla?;eil'966y

4muDu4v sla4oiltt/t/l'J'000'€AS'I yo uopelndod 1elot e peq lI 't66t ul (01)'91 aEed'(tOOl)'uopuol'a1qe1suo3 paqsqqnd'ue11l A

dmqa [q't1ot7 ul utsuoaa! lo asn 4oc1t1pod aqJ :SVgJSVWJgJdnd (6;E)'eraqlraEa puE selqs

pal;ug aq1'u1q;lg ug 1qfti JUJ f sl1euolfeu a1;q,n aq1,tq papdun.rl qrn4 (g€)

av\ls t']vtcos utoNn yIoc3SHl

98r

'88 afud '(CgeD'uopuol's{oofl uor1,(q pa-qqlqnd tarlo1-ro^a.trI'U'9,(q uo;pnpo.r1u1'sualals'H'U 1auo1o3,{q uuu.ragaql uo{ pelulsue.Il'pnouag qo5uu.rg f,q palfpg \26y Tudy-ttoruqal ssau-nroe uuDurog-raqlH aqt U7TJIH I'IOCM IO JNgh[VJSgJ gHJ Q9)

'(plqD '61aBed'n7o3 {g ap173uts1g a{Z UBppolS (I9)'(plqD 'g77a8eilJto7o3 tg apllSutsty a{/'przppofs (09)

:rBl\ plrolll lsrld eql Jo {"arqfno aq1 arogaq 'y161

aunf u.r spJorl asaqf alo.r,n,tqenpu Joqlnu aq; 'p.rora.r atp Jod ir a8ed '(OZ6t)ruopuol '11eH pus uuuduq3 ,{q paqqlqnd 6p.reppolg do.rqlo1 tq'7')VW- str dn s - oTtr o/tt sJ IILTI J s N Me v v o 7 o J t o s a LL ot"" gjo g?]oSuplgds lulod ou aas I os 1utguap! a.re sapoloap! asaql aldoad pou ro.{ (8S)

'salsls palgn aqf q se.rt[od uopru a,r4uurgyry (,9)'(qsgod ul) uop;pe e nrd auo;sue1

1e - Jeqsllqnd aq1 ,{q,(leuos.rad pauroJu! se,n I - EuJpnpul 'saSun8uq ,{uuuu! suoplpe snoJarrmu q8no.rql ueeq sertr fI 'punog puv tso'J uollqry 45 ap$ eqf.rapun ̂Cpualsuu.q paqsllqnd oqu sel'r plO tiloay uonflW 45 p16,'p.rora.r aq1rod 'suo.qIpe re3ul Eo.r; pelalap sua alonb qq1 lla1qduud pgotutu! Arou slql JoEupu.ud 961 e mo.ry 4onb s1q15ur-rp1 u" I '[1uuFFo ul ploff] ,,'uottdunsatd sttlatualls ol 4lhlqzsnvpuo notlcnq lo a4tads aq1 pasnt lsqDuos ruaulutotd uoyat o'saqcaads tpoa sy$o auo ut utDtlrg olu! uorlo8tuuttpatno4ot tqpasod uaBuop aqlot uonuago ilorp naA oJ ttioug ua2l4-'se8v a1ppg{ eql u! sB r uogutruup pIrEerUIIeqJo lea.rrg aqf sc reqler jaeelndod aqf Jo spseq aql re o papleg q lI 'Jlesll

ersg aql Jo lua! rns aqf sueleaJql 1; 1nq 6ap!.rd leuolluu pue pooquopuu JoaldpuFd eql eulurapun o1 pasn,{1uo fou s! uolmp xIS eql-'r salF,npoorLreH'Jstruv HJnvJ gHJ i gla ITTvgu N)IZTIw ns oKI to za8ed u6 (99)

'816I ol fI atsp (sgoda.r slpau o1) lalqdued eql uI saJuereJerJo raqumuu fnq petspun s! uop"r.rlqnd qry '9 'ON JgTHdhMJ J4DOJ UtNOhJSITilDOS - STOVJNO) NOIJW9IWWI JSNIV9V uSVJ gHJ GS)

' (plqD' 9 afled.' uto1ug tot tog nop) o1g'raloqog (pg)'91 a8ed'(SSet)'uopuol'ulsflJg lsarC Jo,{1rua fsl

-ununnoJ aq1,tq paqqlqnd'.raloslog d;gq6,tq'u1r7ug to! tog no7o3 o71 (gg)'rfre.rncre elq?uoseiu qf;.tr en4

sploqpueuep puu,{1ddnslo arel eql lnq'dgqsuo.rlula.rpag.rad u 1ou q sFlL (Zg)1;c do) '1gg a8ed 'aatg aql to aSopuog'uaflgals (Ig)

awsnvrcos H30Nn wooS]uJ


(63) Hitler, Tbstarnent, page 62, (ibid). I should point out here that sincecompleting the penultimate draft of this book I have found a claim that thesequotes are - or rather the source from which they are taken is 'fraudulenl Inthe 1991 editi onof HITLER'S WAR (page E)' Davirl Ilvingreports that'MartinBormann's alleged notes on Hitler's final bunker conversations' published byAlbrecht Knaus Verlag in German as Hitlers Politisches Tbstament: Die Bor-rnann Dildate (Hamburg, 1981) are in my view quite spurious: a copy of thepartlyflped, partlyhandrvritten document is in mypossession, andthis leavesno doubt.'

As hving is not the sort of person to say anything detrimental about theFiihrer without good reason, this may well be true, but an examination ofHitler's record makes it clear that he was no more bigoted, and probably lesssorttant[e averagewhite man ofhis era. Hedoes makea numberofrostensiblytanti-black remarks tn Mein fu^pf, but it is notable that when the Americanathlete Jesse Owens retumed to the United States he reported (contrary to themyth of Hitlet's snubbing of him) that he had been tneated well by both theGerman people and Adolf Hitler.Ironically' the leading blacknewspaper theChicago Defender reported (in its August29,l936 issue) that Owens'parentshad been Tim Crowed" when they had gone to meet their son at the Hotel NewYorker. Orvens himself nas said to have claimed that Germanywasn't the onlyplace where race prcjudice was rampant.

(64) Apart from his nonsense about the Jewish Question, ofcourse!(65) WHITE POWER, by George Lincoln Rockwell, pages 2912. This quote

is taken from the Second Edition, which is dated September, 1977. No publish'ing details are given, but the book is still in print and can be obtained througha n 'mber of far right distributors.

(66) Often referred to as whites and blacks or even in the United States bythe sick euphemism of whites and "people of color".

(67) The black economist lhomas Sowell has uritten that "It is...a commonpattem among immig'aa$ to eventually overtake native-born people of thesame ancestry.n There can be all manner of reasons why foreign-bom Koreanssucceed in business morc rradily than native'born blacks; they might' forexample, have been prosperous in their own country.

(68) LIBYA: Ga.dhafr Hurnan Nghts Award Given Tb the FightAgainstAIDSin Africa, by Marcel Fakhry, pubtished in Spare Nb July 1992' pages 46'7.

187


This story appears to have originated from a 19E4 report in an Indian dailycalled the Patiot which quoted a well-knorvn (and anonymous!) US scientistand anthropologist, who is alleged to have said it originated from a viruscreated by the US germ war{are department at Fort Detriclq Maryland.

(69> Aids is govt plot: German doctor, published in the 51 Times, August 9,1995, page 7.

(70) Ibid.(71) This is not a total fantasy, it has always been not what you know but who

you know, but this is simply human nature.(72) Eg advancement of non-rvhites over whites, repressive race legislation,

and at times ouhight tyranny.(73) For the r.ecord, the term 'Anglo-Saxonn does not include the cunent

writen(74) See for example Rockwell, White Power, (op cit).(75) The most obscene example of this has to be the Stiinner-like crypto Jew

Gerry Gabler longtime publisher of the anti-white race-hate magazineSearch-light.

(7O For a fuller discussion ofJewish scapegoats old and new, the reader isreferred to the cunent nriter's studyf/ow The Searchlight Organisation IncitesHatredAgainst fiews: A Fresh LookAt The Scapegoat Theory Of Anti-SemitismAnd The World Zionist Conspiracy - with the fuil tact of the " Gable Mernorandurn" ,publisheil by Anglo-Hebrew Publishing, London, (July $9a).

Q7) Singapore's reluctant parenrs, published intheEconomisf, September 19,1987, page 56.

(78) Ibid.(79) Racism in China, publisherl in SpearheadrJune 1980, issue 140, page 3.(E0) Quigley, TragedyAndHope,pages 193-4, (op cit).(81'l Arneican Renaissance, September 199, page 10.(82) Who Hates Whom? published in-4meican Renaissance, November 1992,

page 10. Marietta, Georgia is the heart of the Deep South where it is the whiteswho arrc supposed to be bigoted.

(8) Mixedrnaniages putblack celebities 'on trial': Risingcriticism accuses starsof ethnic betrayal, by I-esley Thomas, published in the Su nday Times , March 6,1994, (NEWS page 15)., (84) See nota26.

188


(85) Unfortunately I have been unable to find a printed reference to this, butitwas reported in a TVnews programme sometime in 1995.

(86) The SA Times camied a report about the possible electrification of thefence in its October L9rl994 editionrBorderfence may be electrified.

(E7) The above cuttingwas forwarded to me by Mike Newland, Press Oflicerfor the so-called Nazi British National Farty. Newland now refers to nNelsonn

as "the biggest Nazi of the lot'. The news programme refened to was broadcastOctober 11. A somewhat longer report was scheduled for broadcast later in theevening, but I found it too painful to watch.

(88) This was a rematch. Eubank was given the decision in the lirst lightalthough most people - including myself - felt that Watson had been robbed.

(89) Watson was winning the fight hands down and had just put Eubank onthe canvas. Momentarily overconfident, he allowed Eubank to seize his oppor-tunity. Ihe major damage was probably done by one lucky (or for Watson,unluclry) punch.Watson left the ring on a stretcher and spent a considerabletime on a life support machine.

(90) The Times, September 23,!991, reported on its front page, that'Ible-phone lines to St Bartholomew's [Hospital] were blocked as hundreds ofboxing supporters rang to check Watson's condition.'

(91) Althougb he recovered to a degree, Michael Watson suffered consider-able brain damage, which, fortunately, seems not to have affected his intel-Iigence, but his fight career was obviously and immediately over, and as far asI know he is conlined to a wheelchair to this day.

(92) I have no doubt that most whites would most certainly not welcome ablack into their family, especially as a son-in-law or daughter-in-laq and ttresentiment is largely mutual. Again though, this is not hatred, but humannature. Welcoming someone into one's home is a different thing entirely, andI have the following anecdote to offer. A fewyears ago I met awell-built youngblackwho told me he hadworked in door-to-door market research (somethingI have also done), and that he had never had any trouble being invited intopeople's homes, especially older women. I too have been invited into theirhomes bywomen - including olderwomen - who didn't know me from Adam,ufiich proves that many people - of all races - are not simply unbigoted butperhaps far too trusting.

189


(93) See for example page7 oI.FKEEDOM UNDER THE I-11W, by the RigbtHonourable Sir Alfred (later Loril) Denning, published by Stevens & Sons'London, (1949).

(94) The full credits for this eight page pamphlet are as follows: AN AC-COUNT OF THE Murderof aFemaleNegro,Whowas Flogedto Deathby orderof an UNMERCIFUL CAPTAIN...Shewing the Iniquity of the Slqve Ti'ade...,printed byJ. Evans, London, (c1E10). This is the edition I consulted. Accordingio the British Library Catalogue, it was republished by the Religious Tfact

Society (c1820).(gS) THE TRUL OF ARTHUR HODGE, ESI-AT THE kland of Tonola,

oN THE 25T-H APRII- 1811..., as recorded by A.M. Belisario and certilied byRichard Hetherington, printed for John Harding, London, (1811). ArthurHodge, who appears to have been a man of some substance, was convicted on

April 30 and hanged on May 8. Ibrtola is the largest of the British virginIslands.

(96) Entry for SL/IVERYin the EncyclopediaAmeicana,Volume 25' pages

19.24.(97) lt is now limorm as Anti-slavery Interrrational; it is the world's oldest

[rrm31 rights organisation.(9E) This was reported in the June 1995 issue oI Searchlighf, a magazine that

can hardly be accused of right wing bias in reporting on race issues-In 1993 a bookwas published on the subject. [Its full credits areBRIZ4-IN'S

\ECRET SL4WS: An Investigation into the Plight of overseas Domestic wor-kers in the united Kingdorn, by Bridget Anderson, published by Anti-slaverTInternationat & Kala5raan and the Migrant Domestic Workers, London,(1993)1. It contains stories of women being lured to Britain and elsewhere,nosfly by non-whites, abused and sexually abused. This is only the tip of a verymuch larger iceberg. Slavery is alive and well throughout the world today,especially throughout the non'white world.

(99) Where there exists the rule of law, there is of course no such thing as"fVhite Man's justice".

(100) According to Revel lin The Flight From Tiath,pages L09'12, (op cit)l' ina few years Amin exterminated some two hundred thousand Ugandans, ex-pelled the Indian merchants and shopkeepers (without the slightest trace ofracism)randtransforueda "land of milkandhoney" into a museum of honors.A Washington source estimated that 100,fi)0 to 200p00 were murdered in the

190

r6T

Jlesr.rq {sB plnoqs JepBeJ aql Eopsanb eql - seuo erlEzlq auos ss llea sB - s^{r!rplues-ptrB auos sploq uBq{8ilBJ lsql andslp luauoE euo roJ l.uop I (g0I)

'@retlsnfuV) 'uopuol 's1dlrrsnuetr41 $eIoJqI ,{q paqsglqnd .uo.reg ropEBxaIVAq.nual p ang raWO aqJ lo anbguc o qtry 11111 toy a1oya1 ,1t$17qaoas,, bttolg pasltluosu1'aru1aqJ :S4NOW4W OOO9 4AVH OJ JHgnO SVW.Iol erusfsu! fsJg aql q pailaJeJ s! JapseJ ary .areq Supueumrop ou spinu acBJslqJo uopntas.rad c.no1s1q eql JoJ alqgsuodsa.r sploq eq,{1apos eql roJ,nef Joad,tt ulepac BJo peqeq leuolllpuortm aq1',t1sno;.mr os lou aq,(eu JO G6I)

'sqlmp

915,ira,ra roJ sq1.rg 969,t1uo are r areql,tueu.rag q Vl,6l ul lutp pryoda.rUeqEIIEJ q,nr1 .(q ssudq applns pmoqv plro/1 aIWU turoqs satt8lg tlurg'arusgly lBuolf"N (rngas-$ue) aq1,(q paqqlqnd sg qer-qn ,pmt8w111ouolto1g

Jo enss! 096I,(1nf aql q peqs[qnd se,n up,l s$g q app.ru 6up{g.r.r.roq v O0I)'a,qpads.rad lelre.r e uloq usqf JeqlBJ

rrupsFqJ E uo{I uailIrn sl c;ua1od uo;ryoqu-pus slqf, 1g1aEed.ft,g6l) .slu?H'arlols8ugsug €u.ua:1r;; 1eqs.retr4i,(q peqsgqnd 6a1r-qr6 pru6eetr41 tq ^q,NOIJ-VOqVNOW HJNAI 4I-IJ :S'NIT'IDI JNTTIS NOITTIW O/UJ GOI)

.JeqrlessrrrD1.reuy uB s? u4q ol parraJar 611 e8ud 'Sq6l'L.raque1da5 ro1 allluorqCqstuualaqlroferres eqt pilIre$s osls srapq puu s1o61q se sal;q,n (qryra1-uou)snolrsuot-eoe.r IIB aJunouep .ra,raro; oqn,t1.rJotr.ru etnosa.rp 'arues aqf t(Iqep;p-erd'(036I) 'eF.roe9 tnp e( "11Sn ssard ,trellrg IE .rrolslH,(q poqsqqndsun'(pq6go arp uo{ parnpo.rda.r oloqd) uoJssardu; puoeas aq1 !1u.ud u.r nps,(1un1cu s! {ooq stql'NOLLWZITWDNON VO NOnWVdgS - 4JIOH)ynOI nmL {ooq Eq ot g)Vggyd aqf q oqlrg g eropoaqf ropuas (tgl)

'(gc do) 699 a8ud,Lg6T,6I.raqualdag .Tstrutouocg (gg1)'(11c do) 6711 aBed'qtrul utotg lrt8ill aqt leaqt (zor)

'uoprn.qsep

sserrr Jo spoqpu aql ertroJaq alqFraf puu tuelrge eJour eql puu .sarua,rpe

,{Eolouqral a.rotn aql ertroJaq a^r pasgp.n erou arll luqt s! uollesllprpgo xopaned1re.6 eql loof se!4unor e11qn ug pauadduq esrnorJo eaeq srouoq qrns (I0I)

'srorloq usJ!{Iv Jo [I"-puepue lls-aq eqf rtro{ reJ are eseqf puv'seleqepN 669'9 arau s peIJ.DI aqu8nq1.reqog'6an1uoc,(g ?snsrolog e alpb ss rleqf .uoglgu gI Inoqs sanzpueiggo uogepdod aq1 1uq1 EulrapgsuoS 'a.rngudep s.ugrw Bu.ulollog s.rea,( aarql

ansr]vrcos H30Nn hroo3Sul


thougb is '\ilhy are the likes of Farrakhan anti-Semites?" the answer is that,like Osuald Mosley, Farrakhan's anti-Semitism is the result of the uncondi-tional hahed directed against him by a certain type of Jew rather tlan hatnedof the Jewish people for the sake of it. Farrakhan's pronoutrcements againstthe white race, which arrc every bit as venomous as his pronouncements againstthe Jews, receive far less condemnation. If any.

(109) It is crucially important for White Separatists to acknowledge therights of all peoples to presene their own heritage, including that of the Jews.Again, it is tempting but fallacious to fall into the trap of seeing the &reat ofracial extinction as one enormous (usually JewishJed) conspiracy directedagainst the white race. This is dead wrong; the world is not made up of twotypes of people: whites and non-whites, period. Furthermore, although in theshort tern the rvtite race alone is (or appears to be) under threat, in the longertern, we all face the same racial extinction.

(110) The Hea\ Mind and Soul of COMMWISM - A LECTURE, by Dr trledSchuarz, published by the English Consultative Conmittee of the Intema-tional Council ofChristian Churches, (1957), page E.

(111) Acknowhdgmsal to Gary Allen's None Dare Call It Conspiraq forFigures 2 & 3.

(1fi2) This is what the Communists call it; under Nazism it is knorm as theIeadership Principle. Mussolini copied it from Lenin, then Hitler copied itfrom Mussolini and added anti-Semitism as an extra dimension.

(113) Quigley, Tiage@ And. Hope, page 443, (op cit).(11a) Quigley, Tragedy And Hope, page 444, (ibid).(115) Quigley, Tiagedy And Hope, page 446, (ibid).(ll.:Q Arneican Hebrau, December 14, 1934, page 110.(117) Quigley, TiagedyAndHope,pages 450-1, (op cit).(ILE) Iewish Chronicle, October 1611936, page 16.(ll9) Churchiil's Wqn The Stntgle For Power, by David lrving, published by

Veritas, Bullsbook, Western Australia, (1987), page 552.(U0) Irring Churchill's War, page 551, (ibid).(nD POLITIA4L PILGRIMS: Tiarck of Westem Intellecfi"tals to the Soviet

Uniory China" and Cuba 192&1978, by Faul Hollander, published by HarperColophon, Harper & Row, London, (19fft), page 118.

192

FREEDOM UNDEH SOCIALISM?

(122) lt may be argued that Shaw was simply visiting but on page 119Hollander comments that for some pilgrins, eyen prolonged residence in theSoviet Union made little difference.

(123) Hollander,Political Pilgrirns, page 146, (op cit).(nq b his 1991 bookThe Flight From Tiuth' Jean-Frangois Revel (already

cited) reports that 60,000 people were shot in the first three months after theconquest of South Vietnam by Hanoi; 20,000 mone wene executed shortly after;300,000 died during the next few years on account of the concenhation camPsetc; yet Westem journalists and photographers scw none of this, nor ofrteducation camps.

I offer also tle following anecdote from personal experience. At the time ofthe Soviet invasion of Afghanistan I was living in Leeds, a city thatwas then ahotbed of extrenist activity, (mostly of the far left but also of the far righO.One day in the city centre I came across some communists sellingtbe Moming^Star. At this time the entire Western media seemed to be focused on Afghanistanandnothing else. So I asked this communist howhecouldpossiblydefend suchan outrageous act, which seemed likely, in my misguideil opinion, to triggerWorldWar III. He replieil that the Soviets had not invaded Afghanistan' theyhad been invited in!

(r2S) THE NEWUNHAPPYLORDS:AN EXPOSURE OF POItrERPOU-T/CS, byA.K. Chesterton, published by Candour Publishing' London, (July1965),page23.

(12O Fendetl,SacVenus Civilization, pages 149'50, (op cit).(127) The Australian-bom anti-Nazi propagandist Sefton Delmer stated this

in the tirst volume of his autobiography Tiail Sinister, lpublished by Secker &Warburg, London, (1961)1. Delmer said he believed the Reichstag lire was thework of a lone individual, nthe lunatic van der Lubbe", and that both the Nazisand the communists exploited it for their own ends. Although Van der Lubbewas indeed a communist he was not aligpetlwith Moscow.

(12E) I am not trying here to excuse Hitler's anti-Jewish policy, but a pro-tracted study of the"Iewish Chronicle for the Nazi era yields some surprisingrcsults.I have summarised these in my 195 bookHOLOCAUST DENIAL:NEWNAZI LIE or NEIA INQWSITION?, (see in particular pageslTQ?).

(129) T\elewish Chronicle for October 25' 1935' page 18 reported in an articleFive Years for Blaclonailing a few rthat an ex-Storm tooper in Cassel had beensentenced to such a term for demanding money from a Jewwho'd had relations

193


with his fiance€ seven years previously. Thejudge was quoted by the paper tothe effect that the "solution of the Jerrish question was the task of the State andnot ofprivate individuals." See also previous footnote.

(130) Delmer, Ti,ail Sinister,page23S, (op cit). Delmer's actual word.s were:The reaction of the public was one of grim satisfaction...Hitler, in stampingon these men,rvas ahero to the averagecitizen...laterrwhen the rcvolting detailsofthe blindindiscriminatekilling ofthe manyinnocentpersons thathadfallenvictim to private feuds and personal nancour came out, this did not damp theapproval of the Getman masses for Hiflet's action.

Abroad Hitleruas seen as a gangste4 putting rival gangsters on the spotIn Germany he uas a new Siegfried kilting a feared and hated dragon.'

(l3l) students'war on "Zionkrn.", published in Pattems of PrejudicerNov-DectfilTrYol11, No 6 pages 234. (l'm not sure how much credence to give thisdaim, but certainly there has never been any love lost between the SWP andOryanisedJenry).

(tt2) Jerws wene neyer interned as such prior to tle outbreak of the SecondWorld War, when they were inteined as enemies of the state and for otherneiasons. Even during the war, not all Jews were intemed.

(ilt3) An interesting article on the Nazi treatuentof asocials appeared in theJuly 1995 issue of .Elisrory Today Writtnn by Lisa Pine, Lecturer in ModemHistory at the University of Luton, it is called HASHUDE AN EXPENMENTIN NAZI'ASOCIAL' POLIU.

(fft4) It has aluays seemed to me the crassest folly to take men who practiceperverted sex with other men offthe street and.lock them up with hundreds ofothermen.

(1it5) Which is not and never has been a likely scenario.(136) Butz, The Hom Of The Twentieth Century,pagel7{, (op cit).(AD This is a controversial subject and a grey arca, at least as far as

voluntary euthanasia is concened, and a full discussion of the ethics of itwould take us far afield.

(iltE) Butz, The Hom Of The Twentieth Century,pageL74, (op cit).(139) Ihe cunent vriter was totd by David Cesarani, the Stilrrner-like (for-

mer) director of the Wiener Library that he believes anti-Semitism to be adisease. It is of course Jews like Cesarani who are one of the principal causesof anti-Semitism.

(12f0) See note 12E.

194


(141) Forabrief discussion oftherule of lawthereaderis refenedto ChapterFour; for a more in-depth discussion see the entries for Hayekin the bibliog-raphy.

(142) This is actually happening, but rather than being the work of a dictatoror conscious, malevolent forces, it is happening by degrees and almost uncon-sciously by the institution of more and more centralised planning and theextension ofthat planning - and people control - to supra-national organisa-tions. AII with the best of intentions, like the road to Hell.

(143) I ewish Chronicle, May 12, 19 44, page 9,(144) An enormous myth has been built up around the German occupation

and tle valiant Resistance; the truth thougb is that, initially at any rate, theResistancehad been theworkof organisedgangswho specialised in the murderof German soldiers and "collaboratorsn, and the occupation, as it was, wasextnemely cordial.

(145) Cimes Discreetly Veiled, by FJ.P Veale, published by the Institute forHistorical Revior, Torrance, California, (1979), page 108.

(146) It should not be forgotten that Hitler was not himself an ethnic Germanbut qas bom in the Austrian town of Braunau-on-the-Inn. Rather than beingany sort of invasion the Anschluss was merely a successful homecoming forthe local boymade good.

(147) And establish a race of blonil-haired, blue-eyed supemen, etc, adnauseum.

(14E) The Belsen lbial also concerned atrocities - real and imagined -committed at Auschwitz. There were two charges on the indictment, onerelating to alleged nar crimes at Belsen, the other at Auschwitz. Kramer nasconvicted on both charges, sentenced to death, and hanged.

(149) The same cannot be said of the Auschwitz thial atFlanldurtwhichwasconcluded in August 1965 after sitting for twenty months!

(150) In its October 12, 1945 issue thelewish Chronicle reported that defencecounsel had claimed that tle inmates of Auschwitz and Belsen had inclurledthe dregs of the ghettoes. The Board of Deputies of British Jews was notamused.

$5D rRaL OF IOSEF KRAMER AND FORTY-FOUR OTHERS (TheBelsen Tiial)rBdited.by Raymond Phillips, Foreword by the Righl Hon. LorrlJowitt, published byWilliam Hodge, London, (1949), page L45.

(152) Phillip s, The Bels en Tiial, pages 145-6, (op cit).

195


(153) Phillips,The Belsen Tiial,page 148' (ibid).(15a) Phinip s, The Belsen Tiial, page 14E, (ibid).(155) Although he did on occasion make anti'Semitic rcmarks, Mosleyuas

never an anti-Semite, ideologically or otherwise. His hostility to Jorra, in

trmrticular to Organised Jewry, nras due entirely to their taming hin and hisorganisation with the same brush as Hitler, and to unprovoked attacks onFascists by Jewish street thugs in the early thirties.

(15O A BUF slogan.(157\ TIIE BRIflSH POLITICAL FRINGE: A Profik, by George lhayer,

publishetl by Anthony Blond" London, (1965), page 16.(158) As well as founding the nationalist magazine Candour, Chesterton

published a conspiracy classic The New Unhappy Lords, a book which, whiledenounced by Organised Jewry and their fellow travellers as anti-Semitic, isno such thing. Like Gary Allen in his runaway bestseller None Dare CalI ItConspiracy (published seven years later), Chesterton goes to some lengths toabsolve the Jewish people ftom being solely responsible for the world govem'mentmovement

(159) According to the June 1970 issue of Spearhead,which was then publish'ed in support of the National Flont, the Reverend Brian Green stood as an NFelection candidate for Islington North in that year.

(lCI) At least two Jews stood as NF candidates at one time Albert Elder, whowas an anti-semitic propagandist of some repute and a friend of Lady Biril-wood; and GerryViner. Both arc now deceased.

(161) On August 21, 1962' John Tlndall was quoted thus by the Daily Sketch:nln our democratic societytheJewis likea poisonous maggotfeedingon a bodyin a state of deca/, ffiener Librarypress cuttingl. For the record, the quote'given in the edition of this paper held at the Newspaper Library Colindale' isnln our democratic societytheJewis likea poisonous maggotfeeding onabodyin an advanced state of decay." Ihis is the version that is generally quotednowadays by llndall's detractors.

On September 9,1962 the People newspaper quoted the youthful MartinWebster (the most hated boy in his school) thus: n...we're busy forming awell-oiled Nazi machine ftpenghout the counfi" and Yes, Hitler was righlThe Jew is the magot of society.n

(162) In this incar:nation speltwith a h5phen.

t96


(163) Civil liberties group bans National Front, by DavidWalker, published inthe Times, April 16, 19M, page 1, reports that the NCCL had decided at itsAGM the previous day that "it would no longer recopize tle civil rights ofmembers of the National Flont and otherracist orfascist organizations'.

(164) Ihe front page of the Iewish Chronicle for March 2, 1979 reported thatthe Board of Deputies of British Jews had complained, not for the first time,about the dissemination of anti-Zionist propaganda at Anti-Nazi teagremeetings.

(165) The SWPhas been branded "anti-Semitic" on more than one occasion.(160 This is an e,xageration but only a slight one. It is though entirely

accurate to say that ANAL is the SWP's front organisation. See also nextfootnote.

(167) As long ago as October 1978 the National flont published a pamphlete;arlled,Lifiingthe lid offthe 'Anti Nazi League'which documented all this, butas I say, it is the world's worst kept secret.

(158) The National Anti-Klan Network changed its name to the Center forDemocratic Renewal in 19E6, fNazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Othen on theFringe: PO LIflCAL EffiREMI S M IN AMEKICA, by John George anrl Laird'Wilcox, published by Pronetheus, Buffalo, New Yorl (1992),page,l08l.

(169) George & Iililcox, Nazi Comntunists, Klansmen..., page 407, (ibirt).(170) This led to my being ejected from ttre House and found in Contempt of

Parliament.(171) Revel, The Flight From Tiuth,pnge 43, (op cit).(172) Revel, The Flight From Tiuth,page E3, (ibid).(173) See pages 104-5.(L74) T]ne July 1983 issue of Spearhead carried an article 'IT WILL BE

YOUR'WEEKEND", in which llndall reprinted a letter from Webster to ayouthful National trtont member which, if genuine, is as clear an indicfuentof homosexuality as any of the comespondence that passed between oscarWilde and his worthless catamite Lord Alfred Douglas. To the best of myknowledge the authenticity of this letter has never been challenged.

(175) Rand, The Wrn"te Of Selfishness,pageTD, (op cit). Rands actual wordswere nln anycompromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profrL'Perhaps a betterphrasewouldbe There is no niddle groundbetween commonsense and lunacy."

r97


(176) In 1993, BNP candidate Derek Beackon was elected to the council in afreak bye-election rcsult which caused absolute hysteria on the streets of EastLondon. And swelled the coffers of the so-called "anti-racist" left.

(177) lA particular our grossly overpaid academics. The 1989 bookGoy andLesbianYouth, Edited by Gitbert Herdt PhD, is a particularly sick example.

(178) Erc-Chief Rnbbi mdones genetic engineering to stop homosaatality: Pro-gressives join gays in attack on Lord lakobovits, by Valerie Monchi, IewishChroniclerJuly23,1993, page 1.It is standard practice for Jewish holy men togive not only spiritual guidance to their flocks but advice on major technologi-cal developments and innovations, especially for so senior a rabbi as lordJakobowits.

(179) In his - at times inadvertenfly hilarious -bookUncomfonable QuestionsFor Cornfortable fews, the late Rabbi Kahane denies the frequent charges ofradsm levelled against him in the followingwords: "...any htrman being - anyArab -who seeks to become Jewish and converts according to Torah lawwill beaccepted by Kahane as a Jew at least as good as Shimon kres." l{hich is notthe inpression he gives throughout the rest of the book, to say nothing of hisfrcquent calls to expel Israel's Arab population.

(1E0) The Lirnits of Tblerance, by PauI K;.rrtz, published in NEW Humanist,March l992rVolume 107, No 1, pages 4{. This is said to be an editedversionofa speech by Kurtz.

(l8l) The Heterosu,tal Wctirns of Homophobia,by Terry Sanderson, publish-ed,in NEW Humanrf, September 1991, Volune 106, No 3, pages 5{.(1E2) Cultural, religious, national...

Chapter Thirteen: The Fight fuainstSocialism, National Suicide AndRacial Death: The Way Forward

(1) Anti-miscegenation laws were struck down as unconstitutional only in1967; miscegenation remains a social taboo: not only on the white side and notonly between whites and non-whites.

198

66r

Jo raded$mu,(1q1uou aq1\s11ouo1troN Llsltug p ansq S66I fpf aqf u1 pagod-eJ surf, slsrDosoJelaq 3u1pn1cxa spnxesouoq go elduuxa luesal eJortr y

'ueql slps lI ueq^r sa{asueql epulrtrLrtslp of SqnpInrag.rada.re slunxasouoq'uopuulu-rrtslp pue olqoqdoutoq lnoqe 8uJu1q,t pue 8q11e,nrleql IJB roJ lsrg ue{q aq ppoqs lugod aq1 lnq 'uaas aq of su.ruruer sapaaq EunpuErrmq aseqf s" - sq1uq,(1pleadsa - sa.rllualrl? artres aql esn ol luB,n plnoa eJ"J^{ue;o uos.rad,(q1paq ,{uu fqlq ',,slunxasouoq log,{1uo s! qpq aq1 1eq1 1qft.4noepls IF$JaIqs"J aql [sasec auos u! pus] -'sesgra.rd aql aleal ol raq Jo UFI{s?,t1du1s ,{uu luarne8uueu Jo rulq eiJes o1 asnya.r,{eu Japuaueq aql'-a8euo.rled,(ue uo.q pa8u.rnorslp ,(lprgeualsfs aJu slunxesoJafaq 'auoJ1a,nun,{po pp'slenxasoruoq go luawfofue alg JoJ flssa.rdxa-'palu.rado pus pelr,tro eru sqluq,tu8 pue s.rogud 31d ds.ruq,teg,, ;eq1 spJotar qdleg ue1g61 pre,npg 'ilayuno)-ug lottx"soutoH )llqnJ :tyuruuruoS ruaIS aqJ qde.'?ouou g16l slq uI (6)

'uarn aolleJ .rgaq1,(q paqdsap,tpadoeq 11!$'uogsraLrad pue ,{oe.raue8ap 'pa.r1eq;o seqdosogqd alu6udo.rd oqrr Jorno.r Bqaq leltos-lluu q a8e8ua oq,n aldoad 1eq1 aEpaproq aql :lls Jo lulu4s-uor 6a8Egq aq1 sdeq.rad pue 'slqerlsuor 1e8a1 reqlo aq ppo,$ alary (g)

'(691 a8ud'sq1.raug gqqug

JaIIJ ar$ uo {rsllu p;aeu.r8s.rp eqf of eruareJer aql osp aas) 'op urernJo 1soltr',{11uappra 'su - f,lga1sod rog uogsra,r:ad .r;aq; al"raserd of qsl,lr ,taql ;1 llnJJeJof e uq,(aq1 paa.rq louueJ slBnxesouoq asnuteq lBql pIEs uaeq sBq lI (,)

'stslcotellq^-gue pue elma{-uou Sulpnpq (9)

;a.rlspdar,tpJu1ls.Ip uertr B uo{ a{uqspueq e uurgelsuolpegu a.rouEqq1{uupug I ?uulsrapun uec 16ulq1aruos sI slql 'uegqsal-uou u su 6u;lpad5 $)

'dno.6 plee.r u,(g.russeJeu lotr'qu8y (y)'epua8e uBIJBlIIslol .re1ne;gud.r-raql sasoddo oq,n auo,tuu'aI (g)

'uogggep fqpassatddoeq lsnu g uopepdod :pe1q o/o001 e seq ,ir;unoc s J! leqf sa;1du; fI esnureqpJnsq" as.r,t.ilH eJe tuo$oq eql uo s{Jelq eql aaeitl ,{1qe1;,rau1 puu s,{en1uuogeta.fasgo sua1s,{s palJoJua,(lsno.ro8p qtns lBItrl sulelt aql's{mlq qlprelulJosse oX pa11pr'.rad lou aru selglta uollpgep fq uaql sellq r q1!^ elelJosseol pag;u.rad lou aJu s{t"lqJ! aruls 'dno.r6,(uuJo slq8g aqf Jo uogulo!^Jo Uos.tue alnlgsuor - p;aqgudy 8ulpnpu1 - uope8a.rEas .rou sraul uolleuatarqu'pueJeqllau la,ranoq ,{l-rleeJ uI 'etunouep ol lJlt{s sr(u,qe q ,(qqo1

"tslcoJ'llrte,aq1 'uo11eEa.6as qtprt su 'qagq,n euo pue luamnfuu uoturtroJ e s1 qq1 (7)

av\snvrcos u3GNn l/IocSSHl


the British National Pa"ty; a public house in Liverpool was said to caterexclusively for honosexualsl normal people were turned away at the doon

(10) The AIDS industry is a tlinly disguised front for the organised homo-sexual movemenl krhaps the most insidious of these front organisations isthe Tbrrence Higins Tbust. Ostensi.bly an AIDS charity, it is staffed largely bymilitant homos and screaming queens, its educational literature is blatant,pro-homosexual propaganda, factually inaccurate and often obscene.

(11) The reader is rcferred to Chapter Nine, note 24 and, the technique ofbringrng about necessary change by first creating the problem then steppingfonvard with the solution.

(12) This is perhaps the dirtiest trick of all, and is one favoured by theanti-porn industry. Britain's leading Libertarian Chris Thme once said thatwhen they start talking about protecting your children what they are reallytalking about is destroying your rights.

(13) Thomas Jeffersonr letter to W.S. Smith, November 13r1787, from pageIEZ of ifueBLOOMSBURY DICTIONARY OF QUOTATIONS, published byBloomsbury London, (1987).

(14) Like nost members of the SWI Tom was highly educated as well as highlyintelligent and had completerl his MA.

(15) Tom suffered from a very rare illness which came on suddenly in mid-life.A mutual friend told me that the doctors had used him as a guinea pig to someextent (they had no choice), so no one knew what would be the eventualoutcone. His death was as sudden as it was tragic.

Notes To Bibliography

(1) The British Library Retrospective Catalogue contains six entries forvarious editions of lenin's collected works including what appears to be acomplete set of his unabridgednritings in 46 volumes. This was published byMartin Lawrence in 1927 and 1930; tlere two translations of Volume 13. Ibelieve the frrst tranche - which comprises Yolumes 1 to 23 - is incomplete, butI admit freelythat I did not, and have no intention of, wading througb thewholelot.

200

r0z

'w6tpstw qqqq {apm6s.npsar B s"q g !9761 puu 6€til uea$feq paqsgqnd su"n egpaedop,trua sFLI €)

ansnv|eos : H3€N 0, $fo€33 HJ


Authorts Index

Like its compiler, this index is woefully inadequate, but it should be suffcientfor most rcaders. A number of authors have been indexed together with theirbooks, althongh in some cases the books alone have been indexed. For a fullerlisting of authors and books, the reader is refemed to the bibliography on pages140-9.

Abortion, 1l5,l48rt9lAbzug, Robert, author Inside The Wcious Heart...r1,40rl82Affirmative action, t3 4, 1.86Afghanistan,193Africa, 18, 35, 95, 100-1, 105, 107, LIO-L, 128, L42-5, t52, 155, 160, 164,LE3-4,187Africans, 35rLllAr160Afro-Americans, 108Agriculture, 63, 98, 17 3ArDS, 20, 22, 35, 10E, 136, 140, 142 -3, 155, 164, 187 -8, 200Ali, Thriq,5,151Allen, Gary conspiracy theorist and author, 52,140,L52,192rL96Allies,80, E4, L2Lrl23Altruism,138-9America\American\Americans - throughoutAmerican CivilLiberties Union ( CLUI-,?2American Civil IVar. 159Arnerican Hebrew newspaper, 140, 159, I8l, 192American Liberty kague, 179American Relief Administration. 56American Socialist Party, 59Anin, President ldi, 114, 190-1ANAL (Anti Nazi I*ague), 127 -8, 185, 197ANC,111Anglo-Saxon , L03-4, 10E-9, 115, 188

202

g0z

97I' ETI'3 11'ue.rlquoqlnvETI'Irl5egpny

z6l' 99T' M' 0 L'u1p.4snys6r'98r'z8T'lil-' 9e-' Ecr'€0r'96'zlprqtsnv

96I.' z8l' Ecr' E6'19'sappo-qyISI'S?I 561',{uouo.4sg

gg',t8o1o.t1sgt6I 'slBltosv

gg1'Lg1''66'1"Z 'suugsy

ZgT'lI '(qlleag pue Suploug uo uopey) g5gg LI' 69'upqc p4rurnredns Y11SV

I71'sqEJV,€ tlqury

86r'Ofl'8r'qerv661'T11' '91'p.taqgedy

9gI '89'8up1ous-Puy

06I'gtl'p11',fta,re15'Puyv6T'z6T '8fr 'rgr '0ll'8-gzr '60r 's0r 'v6'7'06'68'6-8r 'us.q;ua5-11uy

utspoJ Jepuin e6s -,,tslloJ-lluy,,\,,tzls1l2-guy,,

669'u.tod-puyTVNV rapun aas - an6ea-1IzeN PrV

L6l' E6I"' 8- Lzl' Tcl'-rzeN'!luv6€I 'slslcssJ-lfuv

z81-' 6 Lr' ffil' E' 75'97'1s10se;';xuyg71'8uuq1q-nuy

7g'uogeuguFrslp-$uvggT' g Z'ls.runurnoc-11uy

19 6uqunmruoJ-lfuygp lqp1;ilec-puy

0Zlr;qqteg-lluyLgr'9Tr' LU' Zll'Z? tcelq-puv

9ZI'uEsV-$uV16I 'SII 'uog.roqe-puy

f 9T' 6 L' 6Z' 9I'uuluouguY96',trlo1odoq1ug

961-'ETT 'ssnlqesuy

eylsrlvrcos u30Nn v{ooSlHl


Authoritarianism' 118Axelrod,52Bahamas,184Bankers, 44r 52, 58Banking,123,159Banknotes,49Banks, 13,411107,118Bantu,97BBC,111Beackon, Derel 198Beethoven,30Belsen, lB-s, 1234, 145, 169, 182'3, 195'6Benn, Nigel' 112Bermuda,99,100' 184Bigotryn 9L, 96.,!7, 1lit' 138, 155Bilbo,141,191Birdwoo{ Lady' 196Birmingham Six,25' 158Birthrate, 110,114B lacles hirt, 91, t26, t{l, LnBlair, Tony, 44rE2r167Bleackley, Horace, atthor Life of lohn Wkes, I41, 159BNP - see under British National PartyBoard of Deputies of British Jews,92,L95,197Boas school' 95Bochimans,183Bolshevih 4,72,32,50'2, 90, 105, 128, 147,L68,171Bolsheviki' 139Bolsheviks, 2, 504156, 63, 65' 90Bolshevism, 17, 50-tr 116, 168Bondage Of The Free, 98, L47, 156, 1844Bourgeois, 15, 28, 47, 5L, 79, lffiBourgeoisie, 24, 53, L66BoyzNthe HoodrlSSBoxing, LL, 21, 7 2-4, 91, 141, 17 7, 189Branson, Richard, 10r 43

204

902

z6r'ggr' 6LT' 6w'wr' olr' gg' Lz'errl\J9'allqJ

6Lt'SVl'ap&ua44t1396r' E6l'Tvr' L-gcr'oe[ "x'y

6uopelsaq3

ts's{aqJp151q1.req3

ooz'vLt. '6'9 EFeqf,t6f 'p!,ru('panese3

v L1.'v;l'lzr'sg'fg'gE' Ll'dgqs.rosua388I 'gg'sapprqala3

gg1'se;1oq1e3g41rwsp11oq1e3

r9l's'z 'o.r1se3

8L'69'7r 'Irye3ZSI' 1l'rrarpug'apau.re3

ggl'rrr' 6L' 6s' Eg'E'w'ygl'slsqegde3I Ll' g-sgl' 0gr' vtr' 6Tr

' tnl' yl L' L-gg' vg' 6s' L-gs' vs' lv' 0F 6E' zE- 6z' 6l' gl'4'uq1e1.rdu3

961 saqzu8ern Jnopuo7I-09I'09luoep'qeqduu3

gg'e1poquu36-rgl'uotr tlampp3

slslrs"dJo uolun qs$Irg raprm eas - dlfg0s'spssrug961r;aun.rg

97'pg'tltpaa 'u,no.rg

,qsfo{, Jepun aas - p! EO'uplsuo.rgIBI'69I',t1apog Eqqqlqn; suofFg

961'l9l' 97;'16'slspseg ;o uolulf qsplrg002'g6r'6gr'r8r' g Ll' g9l' vq.l' 6cr' Elr' L6',tgu6 puo;p1r,1 qs$Fg

t?'sBc rtrsllFgIBI'S?I'11W'I-06 '(dg.ro s$Irsed qsp;.r{) ltspsed qslllrfl

S'&red lsFmuuo3 qslfFg

B-Lgl'WI|8u{aug,9I'p1uo{I hauqzarg

g6y'uu1-aq1-uo-nurmeJg

ewsnvrcos H30Nn t/rool3ul


Chinatown,10LChinese, 85,Y7,101, 105' 110' 155Chirimuuta, Richard and Rosalind,authors I,IDE Afica And Racism, !42, L64Christian, !13, 14S -6' 155 4, L9l'2Christianity, 90, 130Christians, 11,154Churchill, Winston, 119, 123'169Clarrcndon,154Clinton adminishati on, t37cND 89Collectivisation, 86Collectivism ,40r97Collectivist, 47, 84, gfJ' 125, l:29Collins,Andreq 162Colonialism, 94{' 101' 108Commonwealth,125Communism, 3 -4, 26, 4L, 46, 50, 54-6, 7 9, 81, 84, tl6, 123, 129, 145'6,150-1, 155-7, 161, 168-9, 172-3,t92Communist, 2, 5, 19, 20, 25, 27, 35, 41, 50, 56, 60, 62'3, 7 4, 79' E0' 83, 92,g 6-7, 102, L1-l, t20, 122, 128, l4l, 145 -6, 150, t56 -7, 17 0, L8,l, 186, 193Communists, 3, 5, 23, 25, 3 4, 41, 4E, 52'3, 56'7, 61, 63, 89, 96, 120'L, 143,146, 150, l:67, \7 A, 192 -3, tmConspiracy, 2 5, 52, 7 0, 88, 90, 96, 104, L07, L09, 126' 140, 142'3, 148, tn'175-6, 188, 192,196Coventry,121Crime, 51, 100, 107, ll2, L43, 148' 172, 185Crimea,lM,t54CryingWolf,l48,l85Crypto-Jews, 1116Cuba,144, t70rl92Cuckson, Don' 83Currie, Edwina,87Dachau, 93, 103, 110-1, Ull' 182, \E6Daily Worker (see also Moming Star),56,83,L79Dallas, L41,179

206

Ljz

L6T' E'rgl''0sr'str' Tvr' v;t-' grr' grl't'rll'16-68's9'8t'6'91 lqrsegr-o8r'tfl'osr

' Lvl' 6' LEI' 6Tl' srr' zz' 6Tr' L' grl' v 0r' z6' 68' 99' 99' 8' LT'7'uspsegZ6l' t61. 6911'qno1'ueqlerrug

9II'u?IqBJE-Zgl' EVI' 0l1''W'79'suu11 teuas,(g

19 t1,'suopel.rilo.rtlxg

V6l'ZTl segsuueqlng

SZI'0T1- 'scJuaEng

6g1-'ZT1,'sFrqJ tueqngy115e1iloq1g

16'xnuupbsg,{rua8y uogteloJd Islueuuorlaug Japun ees 'Vdg

g8l'Ltl '88'(Vdg) ,{oua8y uolpelord 1uluetntror! rgISI'S noq3'n-ug

Brr 'rg 'zv'1137'qaiug

ZtI'yCI'gtytq1qougg LI' L'98' ? L' 89'17'1uau,(o1dug

88'tg 'Eu1p[ng-a.4dug

gg'gg',f,r.re11 tclqdtg€9'sallg

9616gaq1y teplg6lT'W'mspepregpEg

69',trlsqqztezg99',t1odonq

SgI'9-g9I'fHoU'pfflnqggr' Igl' Egt' zll' 8ll' v L'$'ro lew'su16noq

,6I'PeIJMeol'se16noq66r'sfl 'v'EEr'll.l' 9'E0l'z-02'8' Ll'z'lr'uopuulugcqq

zgr' 091' zcr'yill-'zE' 6z'vz' Ll t1 5d;qs.rolqa;q

z9'uollBslunqs-ec061' ZVI'(pa.q1y .r;5,(garu.roy) p.ro1'6u1uuaq

Lll' 8Z'7'us;1ul1ual Dga.rtouaqV't61,' ZVI'14'uoryag'.rauPq

z0I'uollBsllBluolocao79'etn,e1'salau(

aNsnvrcos HfcNn l/\oo=l3HJ

B0z

sr'slou-ea?H puE Se^oH

V6T'glT 'aPnqqsull

98I'8tI' EVI' E1l !.reqe;g'Poonru11I0I'uaIrsII

69I'89I'g'97'sndtoc sDaqDH

8SI'SZ'.rnog P.to;P1-tnggg1 'eur1 sese.rg

97'sleequaarg1g'Paqsunun 1ea.rg

lnoqtno.rql - lueurrJeao36 LT'SVI'991 6usa.rq1'ueu'rog

,s'F[Jo96'fuug'.raPnPlog

191'p.renpg'q4usP1ogZ Ll' 08 5uuuuta11 r8ugeoe

69l'1sous0l9

i 6l' T6r' L$l' z8l' zrr' 6-8ll't0r' 16'68' 98'08' z9' 8z'6' 91 "(ueulag 98I '€tI 's1oiue.1g 'Pnouag

TEI'cf,T '60r'g0r 'r'00r '9'96 6aplcouag

A6' uolz uo^ uastall DP asswulaAao

S8I'Z8I'I'0€I oflI'E1l' L6's-raquuqe seg

€€'oeIIIe9LgT' EVT'1auo1o3'SBIIPU988I '0?I '94 ',t'r'rag 'alquC

I-09'I 'ure5 'qqeg

Ja$III Japun ees - Jerqnd

lnoq8no.rql - suoPaeq4\uopae.\f,

6 Ll' gg!.reqllg 5nur1uu44

lE'aLlJ ?DaqulDryno[zsr'Lvt 'll ',tsguo.l

0gI'ttl 596',irua11'P.rog

ggl''Evl'$i'L'zv 'gY'9 tne6 61oog

9gI'Sfl '7-19'saplpd uo;pa1o.rd (ppo;) plag

o8r'9sr'str'8or .lslquag

8II ?elr$rog taPag

96l' z'l'8l' 6gt' z'Irvl' l'jl'' Lzl' szl'' lzl' 9I'l.' z' 06' 8' I L' 99'6 g 6 s1 spsug

at/\lsnvlcos uScNn vuoclSSHJ

602

tgI'wT'0II'86'stropBleu arsu Jo alnlpsulgg 'zs 'sraprsul

LgI,pVappltwIulLgl'VZ 'app;1ue;u1

96 6pg'.(1;pnbarl

Z0l'96 'suegpul

g8I .56.ElPtrI

01.T'tL 6sa,q1uaru1

s9r'09r'wl.'l'001'16'01'67'uqppadul' ggt' Lvr I gzl' E'ztt' 0ll' v'z0l'uope.6gnu1

Lg1''Z'0ll's1ue.61uu11LT'Wl'99'sq8noq'aP,{g

LLl'VL'1'1P ',&e8un11

g6T' L6l' lgl' s gl' zsl' Lvr' zvl' q;l' 0z' 6r',(llunxasowo1166I'86I o0€I'9€'otqoqdoutoP

€6r'16r'€8r'€tr' }vr' TEI' gzr' E'zzr' Ell' t-.E6' w' 8l'1snuro1o1119 5poo,n(11o11

061' IVT'711'.rnq.rY'aBPogV6I'E-Z81'1p1 3 t tryua3 Waltua4l aq1 tg mog

S0I'11.lad ^ro[e aql uo taplH

9gl' Etl ssluauncop uuzlllJofl-JanlHlnoq6no.rql - JIoPV'laplH

LLI' q7l' 96'uu1qso.rlg791'uro r Pu6'6.rnquePu111

r6t\tt'feu'ntH9I'Wn.r; reqElg

g-15'esodlnd roqElg791 'qdlopng 'ssa11

pg'suepqJpa.ragS9I ',(WS 's8upuua11

8rI 'I8 '79 'ueg1a8a11

09I'la8aH49'a.rerq;pa1196'ueupua11

g 6T, g LT, LSl, ESl, EVT, gg . 1 7 . 97.rcqlnu tc;rapa1{ !e,tz11g?I'quo {3H

erusnvrcos ulcNn v\ool3uJ


Intermarria ge, LlA, L3lIntemational Jewish Conspiracy' 109International Jews, 52, 90Internet, 64-51173-4rQ 1s2IRA,129,165Iraq, L14Ireland" 100,107Irving, David, author, 144, L50, 187, L92Islaa (theSparQ,52Islam, 115,130Israel,198Italy,90, 148,185Jackson, Michael' 66Jakobowits (or Jakobovits), Lord, 35, 130, 164,198Jamaica,113Japan, 70r99,105, 175Japanese, 70, 93, 105, 110, L48, 17 5'1Jaubert, Alain, author Making People Dis appear, 64, t44, L723Jefferson, Thomas, 42,137, L65,200Jensen, Arthur,34, 84JewVewish\Jews - throughoutJew-baiting' 91Iewish Chronicle, 91, t22, 14/,, 180'2, 191-3, 195' 197-8

Jewish Conspiracy,l09Jewish People's Council, 92Jewishness, 169Jewish-controlled' L23Jewish-led, l2l,l92Jerrish-onmed, 128Jew-wise' 181Jewry, gLA, tlg, 126'9, 134, 148, 169, L94, 196Jiha4 52Jordan, Colin, 89, tLs, 126, 144, 154' L69Joyce,Wliam'91Kahane, Rabbi Meir, 130' 198

2r0

TT7,

II 6xouua'I's!,na-I

Sfl'S$'suelqsr1gg 6op.ruuorl

79'a4o1cg uaal4u?7Zg'gI6t ua au!u?7

(1qqur1-pprretr l puu usluluerl-uspilsntr osp ees) 1noq8no.rql - quqlg7'tcynPual ToEaT

921 'qdasol'qr.uagr1

€BI'IgI'gzl'16!pury'asae'1(,ru1yo aInU Japun osp aas) '1noqEno.rq1 - nurl

I8'slsp{crB|ilqlgg'lspp.reme'1

S-t€ susItIJJBEE-I

TgtoreuelI9I'6-89'19' 79' e4ot-zassP1

6' L Ll' tgl' zll' E' z8' g L' 6v'.{rrua .rnoqef&u{aug npuneas - &u{a1tg noqD1

86I'Z-IEI rpug'z1ma

B9r's9r'9sr oos'6v'gv'g'gv'I,v'6y'u199 6uny

79'qeo1-uqnYts's{u[nx

E- Z Lt' E-Zg oBlI{IN heqrqsn.rA6S 'S-tS 'lpslsuor)N

ELI'Lgl 'ulluary

g 6l' Z8l' 9ll' f' ECf, taso 1' 6.rauu.rA

IgI 'T9I 'rnqf.rV 'uoslga

gg1 ',(aupog'Euyy

1,€'e!q"ry Jpnuggo 3u1yg1 'ueq1euo1 38u.ry

97'uqol Eu.rygLl'alEL 'uoq'Eu.qtr

gg tapuuxaly',{rlsua.rey7, Ll' EVI' 6Er' 7-19'rr&ql

19 !.rnoc oore8uuyqLl'11g '69 r,rauewuy

971 'tuuJq3 ':Iaqs-1uy

ev\s t-lvtcos HtcNn uroc3Sul


Libertarian\Libertarianism\Libertarians, L, 30-1, 71, ffi' 135' 139'161,171,173,179,200Uberty, 2, 22, 92, LLI, 7:21, 137, 143, 146 -7, 153 -4, 157, 169, 17 0, t7 5, l7 9Librarian, 83,L76Libya, l43,tB7Lincoln, Abraham, 42, 142, 159, 165Lintorn-Orman, Miss Rotha, 90'1, 1ElLivingstone,164Lobbying,20,134London Labour Biefing - see underBnefingLoplists,126Luneberg,182Lysenkoism, 346163McCarthy erar57M agis trate s' C ourt Act, 27Magna Cartar26-7rLSEMalawi,35Malaysia,l9rL33Mandela, Nelson, 111, 189Marais, Jaap, 1EMarketing, 66, 68, 72, 87, l7 5Martov, Julius' 50-2Marx, Karl, 1, 3 -5, l4-5, 29, 3L, 43, 49'50' 62' 81, 105' 139, 160-1Marx, Karl, racism of , 42, L48, 153' 165Manism\Marxism-I-eninism, 5, 14'6, 19, 24' 34, 40, 50' 64' 81' 83,96-8, 110, 128-9, 138, 145,150,t56,t6l,l74Manrist-Leninist, 40, 50r 128Mattoids, n11'30Media, L7, 20, 29, 32-4, 38, 57, 6l'4, 66, 80, 93, 9 5, 100, 104, L07, LSL,L60, l7 2, 17 4-5, t7 9, 186, 193Mein Knmpf,187Menshevik, 150' 168Mensheviks,50Mental HealthAct'27Merchants,190Microsoft, 8rl0r174

212

EIZ

06I'g-tgl'I Ll1' 66'1g',(q Eupoq lqElan irueq Jo aJu"uylrop'seo.r8alq' ggl'' zvl' }vr'v;Tr'r0r'86'9'96'89'7y'seo.6ag\o't8au

16I'salaqepNsapreqn II4f, roJ lpuno] IuuopsN repun aas 'IJJN

poq8no.rql - rus;zeg\s1zuN\Iz"NI-09I'0€ tuP:etrq'eaol.IlsJ

"NEET' IZI' 97'sXs11uuo.t1u1r,1

6Cl' 60T'01'8I'91 6usguuoPulq

8- LE' L'aePr.rag $1eeH l"uolfsN. L'96I'9LI '6'9g['fuo.U 1utrollsNL6l' Z6 6sag.raq.t1 t.I^!f, roJ lltuno3 IEuoIluN

16I'eruul11v IBuol1eNg71'uoaloduP

€gI'III'egqguePg6'pleseteg

Z6l'Zgl'0Z1-' 6ll'68'8I'o1;uafl 5p11ossn141

69'ueelrPy troluv lressntr{0€I'99 3(sua1so141.ro) stuqsn141

1161"'96'Ueqog 'equtntr4

8Zr hvun11y 'anb;quezo14i

g 6l' z6T' z'r8l'' gcl' 16' uz'p1ars g .q5 6'ta1so141

0€I'9€'(su;1sntr41.ro) sua1so141

E6I-' 691' gsl,' Lvl' wl' z9'19'nocso14169I'IS rerug',roso.rotr41

E6T' 6 Ll' €8 | 69' Qa4,n21 t1o q oslu eas) ;o15 SuttuoYtlgg'uufuotr41

gg'napbsa1uotr41941 ',tuosdouo141

g LT' Egl' E- zsl' zw' r L' 6-89' E' zg' 8E' gl' El',(1odo uo141E;I'do.r1uaqqlg-^ololotr l

ZLT'Zg ho1o1otr410t'Irlntr

86I 'S$ '€gI '0gI 'III '60I '?0I 'S6 'uogeua8ersg4l

79'ue,{o4.rtr4194'd;qa-o.rr541

awsnv|cos H30Nn woo3SHl


Newton, Sir Isaac,85NF - see under National trlontNo Colour Bar for Bitain, 103, L4l, t86NomenHaturarS3Non-anti-Semitic,89Nuremberg, 61r118rt72Odour,184Oligopoly,68Owens, Jesse (J.C.), 187Ortrord-educated, 45Paedophiles,174Falestinians, 120Pendell, Elme4 author SEX WRSUS CU4LIZATION, 96, 120, 145,tu,L93Perestroika,169P6tain, Marshal, 93Plekhanov,51-2Pogroms,153Political Pilgrims (book and people), 1..l9, 144, 192-3Pollitt, Harry,5,150Pornography, Mrl52Pravda,52P r e gn ancy D i s cimin ati on Act, 2lProhibition, 33, 164Proletariat, 24, 29, 32, 41, 53, 7 9, 8L-2, L45, 156Propaganda, 20, 35, 57, 64, 7 9, 93, 105, 111, 120, 123, 126, L29, t30,L43, 160, L69, 173, 183, L97, 200Protectionism,lTSProtocols of the Leamed Elders of Nippon,10Protocols of the Leamed Elders of Zion,90, 107-8, l2lrt59rl80Prynne, William, 28, 159Quangoes,136Quigtey, Professor Carroll, author Tiagedy And Hope , 14-6, 46, 54' 69,95, 110n l1.8, 146, 153 4, 167, l7 0, L7 5 -6, 183, 188, 192Race-conscious, 191Race-hate, 128, 188

2L4

9rz

tII'00I6ePuuna0S'&Jpd Jnoqerl JllsJtoueq IEltoS uBIssnU

ILT' 6'89l'EgI'' ETI'86'09'zs'0s {97 6uelssna

sgl.' Ezr' 6T]"' 86'08'r-99' vzi' 89' zv' 9' vE' lE'17'7 selssng

97'aPeu,tuunas6r'06r' Lgr' Egl' 6-99r' IET' Lzr' zcl' \cl' 96' *r(' zz 5'r"I Jo erlu

LLT'V L'ZL'99'aqna s$I puu'ou.rg !1qna16'pJoT'erauraqlo1

u,{V'pusg Jeptrn eas - aJ![V'Enuqueso1. V8l'Wl'6'96'utslcoglo sloog

Z,LI' ECI'99'ouelaq uppeqtr !1a^esoog7s'sAousuou

1,;ZT' Z9'6I'lsu-rg'uqaoaV-EV' 0l

( (doqs,{pog Yo .rapunoS)'u1;EV lrfppo19-L9T'W1

'SII '9'S0I 'uloeut5'11e r{togZ9l' qtT' ZS' 0T'.ra1aga4coa

1,-96 sulsePoqX

g-74 5s1quo!s! sUg'Z8I 'tgl '79 '1s;uo1q,reg

lgl susguolsPreg

L6l'e6r'r'06r'f,tl'9?I 'H6UJ WOVI IHDITE gHI $qlnie 's1oiuuq4'uuaf la^sg

S8I'g0I 'uoPePledag

0€1pugrquruE61,'0Zl 'E4sqa;q1

S8I 'Z0I'saaEn;q1

t8I 'S8'unPue.ra;ea

99 (gp'uoPnqFlsIPeU

g'ussauel'alu.6PeX€a eJu

L6l' vgr' 6 LI'' Tgr' Il9l' gvl' l?l' 6zl'86'?8'9s'r€'9'u'tY'pusu86r'06r'88T't'€3r' vgl' zsl' vrl' zvl' gEl' zET' DEl

' g' Lzl' vzr' ll' L}l't' €0r' 00r', 6' I 6' z'16' 0 L' zv' 9' v E' 67' 8I''us-rougIas lJoJ Jepuril ees' utsllDl?oagE1-'1'Z '61 '7'suolluleJ eJsU

v91.'T[l '8or 't6 '0z'6l '8ug1u'aoua

ev\lsnvrcos HScNn vIoGS3ul


Rwandans,101, 185Saar,123Salmonella, E7Saudi, Arabia,37Schiff, Jacob,52Schwarz, Dr Fbed, anti-Communist and author' 25,62-3,t46r150,156-7,170,1723,t92Searchtight (magazine and Organisation), 126, 128, 140'1, \46, 163,179,188,190-1Self-censorship, 17Selfgoveming,96Self-publishing,\62Self-rule,l1ESelf-sacrifrce, 139Self-seekers,1MSeparatists, 133,192Serajevo, 148rL77Shakespearer 30Shaw, George Bemard, ll9 r 193Shub, Davi4 author Lenin, 534, 7 9, 146, 156' 165' 1"68-70' 17 4, L7 7'8Siberia,168Skeggs, Malcolm,176Smith, Adam, 69, 146, 17 5Smit}, (Alfrcrl E), Al, 86, 179Social Credi t, 13, 48, 7 4, 142, L6l, 164, 166, 183Socialism\Socialist\Socialists - throughoutSocialist-indoctrination, 36S ocialist-oriented, 136Socia[st Farty of Great Britain, 48-9' 168S ocialist Workers Party, 3 9, 40, 42, 46, 49' 83, 103, 128, 194, Lyl, 200Sociologr,1025ony,72,74SOS Racisme,1jl8Sout} African Labour Party' 155Soviet\Soviets - throughoutSoviet Union, Western aid to, 56'7 ,147 , L70

2L6

LIZ

06I 'I?I '711 .u1ogo;,

67'sa;.ro;,86I'tlotoJ€6'o,qotrtz'saqlll

Vgl' LII ( suossa'7 tng Joqlne'Iaqosg'apqtr

6tr'ss'rg'slulf,691 'arunbg ueruueuell

0gl' LjT'.roqlne'p.reqr1g'lrognry911 '1sa.re1ug Jo uopleJqlr

IZ'JJIIJ .u.rnq.rory

1,1,1'uu.raqq16 LT' ZSI' VEI'6p'uopuxql

S€'repd'11aq4q1-?6'Blusus-qf

6LI-'g-SLr 'r-0''s$Fqf,

,tge6 sm4.roXllsllultos repun eas - dAfSVTI'Zg luugazlprS

911'uapen508I'I'0rI' LVI'g' Lg'79',{uo1uy'uopn5

l-yL'6 5L'salppqng

'6I '88I'nuar.gg

161 'sngnf '.raqep45

98r' L4'g7l'g-pg1'to1o3 {O apU Sutgy aq1 roqlns'dorqtof {p.ruppo15

9-?gI'9SI' LV1'Z-T0T'96' aatg arg lO aSopuog toqlnu olue)I'uaigqS

,8'usllels59'uqugulg

L Lt' E L' 69t' 6st' 991' Egt' Ltl'gtr'Ezl. '6rr '08 'L9'E'zg'Lg'g'vs'z'09'Bv'zl'0t 'gr'Tf, 't 'z 'ullels

z8r'ssulslFg leer3Jo,(gq4lqppos repun aes - gCdS

gg'to1o1cadgL6l' 96T' 881' Ll1'' g1y' po a qtoa ds

69'uJudgLgI' Lll'roqlne'seuroql'IIearoS

ar{srlvrcos H30Nn t/\ocf 3HJ

g01-,L6.a rququlzgp(ergu.eyg8I'er-rBz

,-t6I'IFaiI rm11atr6LI' 5;g7l'Sg'uns .rg'uas-1q1

6ST' l?T'gZ'uqof 'sa{MA

911',(aeuardns ef$L&tI6T'qVI toqlnu laruflretr4i .16'alle11

1,9 'q.rnq-u.ra1sar11

8If '6I'.reu;aa1

L-961' 6gf, ' L- gTl' ug.le141'ra1sqe116gl' ZIT 61auqeg41'uo qeXl

L LT, t- E L tuu.q .ua.uur11

lnoqEno.rql -.ru6

t LT' gl1- 6.roq3ne'op61',{puepXl

ELt'W 'orBll

E6l'tg1 'g'p1'ueu;ap1

gl1-' wI !.reqalX'1p.r.rer1yg 5uopu41uu.ra1

g9l'Zl',tms1lnoqino.rql - selels pegun

uFe/I osIB aas -.roua,{61

0S'(qua.I Jo .reqlo.rq) raptrExery houe,t61uluerl Japrm aes - l|'ousJlll

161'upue61g6'snqddl

L6r'g6T' 6ct' L{t 6uqo1' \1epudtrlglrSrZroe6.Surg-as;

96'79'1q.rus1€g.uslrBsJ.

g9I 'g0I '0V'6E 'a1.r,t4s1o.q,

LLt' T-o Lr'tr ggr'o9r' gvr'svl-' gtl' T;t' 9 L' Lg' T'09' 6' Lg's'lg' zs' t'gl' El' E' q' 6' g' l' g' uoa"l',$tqo.u

g'suotutuoS aW to tpa8o.+I8II 'uslu"F"lflstol

661' LEI' gTl' E{f, '911'ueprel;p10;

8TT,

er{srlvrcos u30Nn u\|oo33uj

g8r'69r'Ew'wt'tgr'0gr*,grttc6TT*,'*llTt?lil3f?61'tTt'131'us-ruog

91,1'gg'laPoq2

ansnv|cos H30Nn uloo33uJ

FREEDOM UNDER SOCIALISM?Ihb ioril socialism has pleasing connotations, many people in all walks of

lifi ar6 prqud tgcall themselves sopialists. Socialism will, many of them say,equitable wodd.When the economy, or even society

- ' ' - ! , . 1 " : . -

ad?. by the go;rbrymiint, il16vs wealth will be generated, andooid df'Ai at-times^obscen-e inequalities whigh bedevil the capitalist systemwill exisl Smiatists promise and Iook fomafd to a world in which racial andreligious bigotry and intolerance are eradibatedr,-?,ld in which each will pro'

duce according to his (or her) ability.and consqme accortiing to his need. But

what lies behind the rhetoric of peace, love, facial and sexual equality, and the

brotherhood of man? And how much freedom wogld the average person, oranyone, enjoy under a totally planned socialist society?

Ihis book takes a fresh look at socialism:froF- a,L-ibgrtarian perspectiveanil exposes many of the fallacies, inacCuracies and outright lies which arcpropagated tirelessly by socialism's stau'nchest proponents. It explodes thelatter day myth that socialism has alwa'yq been a staunch opponent of racialanil religious bigotry and documents its common origins witf, fascism. Itdissects the BolshevikRevolution, themyth of Stalinism, andthewaysocialismhas been nurturcd by its alleged deadliest enemies' and exposes the waysuccessive generations of socialists have nanipulated the past in order tocontrol the future. Finatly, it e4plains exactlywhat socialism has in store forus and for future generations, and what we must do in order to eradicate it.

Published by InfoText Manuscripts'

g3cVenner Road,Sydenham,London SE26 sHU.England.

ISBN r87r473837

Fbeedom Under Socialism? - Alexander Baron

Documents

Transcript of Fbeedom Under Socialism? - Alexander Baron