Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural typology...

Q1

Q2

lable at ScienceDirect

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12

BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 1/12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

Contents lists avai

Building and Environment

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/bui ldenv

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

OF

Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape:Architectural typology and building physics

Vissilia Anna-Maria*

Architect-Landscape Architect, Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Structural Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Civil Engineering, Kodrou 13, 105 58 Athens, Greece

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 17 September 2007Received in revised form 14 May 2008Accepted 15 May 2008

Keywords:Vernacular architectureAdobe (mud brick)SustainableBioclimatic designBuilding physicsLandscape

* Tel.: þ30 210 3246897; fax: þ30 210 3246734.E-mail address: [email protected]

0360-1323/$ – see front matter � 2008 Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026

Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Mtypology and building physics, Building and

78

79

80

81
TEDPROa b s t r a c t
Sernikaki is a Greek vernacular settlement that can be imagined as a living organism is the outcome ofcenturies of optimization of material use, construction techniques and climate considerations. Beingmountainous and isolated, this small vernacular settlement has preserved old types of dwellings longerthan other areas in Phokida, in mainland Greece, and it can, thus, provide rich material for the under-standing of architectural continuity and evolution. In this study, various types of adobe dwellings aresurveyed and their response to climate, in terms of site and building design, is evaluated. In addition, thetechniques of creating microclimatic conditions by incorporating the existing environmental parametersinto the design are considered. Bioclimatic design employs appropriate technologies and design principlesbased on a thoughtful approach to climate and environment. It is concerned with the layout of the buildings(orientation in relation to sun and wind, aspect ratio), the spacing (site planning), the air movement, theopenings (size–position, protection), and the building envelope (walls: construction materials-thickness,roof construction detailing). This paper evaluates specific vernacular dwelling types and their response toclimate, based on passive design principles that could be adapted to current architectural practice in thearea, in order to optimize the relationship between site, building and climate.

� 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

82

83
C
84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

UNCORRE1. Introduction

The architecture of vernacular settlements reflects Greek life-style and cultural values of the past. These building types and theirsite planning have evolved through time and they have reachedtheir form and layout through trial and error methods. They wereable to respond to the needs of their inhabitants, the climaticconditions, and the topography, because of the simplicity of thebuilding processes, the techniques and the local materialsemployed (adobe, stone and timber).

In the vernacular architecture of Sernikaki one can easilyobserve an absence of purely conceptual and aesthetic purposes,and a focus on a holistic approach that considers the role of theenvironment as a major one, within the limits of the resourcesavailable. Within this view, the traditional builders were concernedwith a variety of parameters that affected a building as well as withthe quality of the building itself. Traditionally designed buildingsare often considered as the predecessors of modern bioclimaticdesign [1]. They display years of embodied experience built on therelationship between building and climate, implying a logicalanalysis, the consideration of appropriate principles, and a rational

All rights reserved.

aria V, Evaluation of a sustaiEnvironment (2008), doi:10

use of resources. These buildings, therefore, can be studied asmodels of environmentally responsive and sustainable architec-ture. In our days, the need for energy thrift design has been wellunderstood and for this purpose appropriate regulations have beendrafted [2,3]. There is also a greater awareness of the importance ofthe socio cultural identity of a place. Both issues make the study ofvernacular settlements, such as Sernikaki, very important.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the Greek vernacularsettlement of Sernikaki, in terms of its architectural typology andbuilding physics. This paper shows that such a building environ-ment acts as a living organism that is inherently sustainablethrough the use of various bioclimatic concepts applied in itsoriginal construction, is tightly integrated with the landscape andhas a minimum waste of resources. The subsequent analysis iscomprised of two major parts: 1) a study concerning the evolutionof the built environment (typological analysis, site planning,construction materials and techniques); and 2) an evaluation ofspecific vernacular dwelling types and their response to climate,based on passive design principles that are responsible for thebioclimatic character of the settlement.

105

106

107

108

109

2. Bioclimatic concepts and building physics

Bioclimatic design, by definition, satisfies the needs of humanbeings (thermal, luminous and acoustics). It considers climatic

nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026

mailto:[email protected]

www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03601323

http://www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv

V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–122

ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 2/12

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

conditions, uses techniques and materials available in the regionand attempts to integrate the building with its surroundings.Moreover, bioclimatic design relies on building physics, which isthe ability and knowledge of how to allow sunlight, heat, andairflow through the building envelope when necessary, at certainmoments of each day and month of the year [4].

The vernacular architecture of Sernikaki may be defined asbioclimatic since, it can be argued, the traditional builder of Ser-nikaki understood bioclimatic concepts, aspects of building physics,and the strong relationship between site, climate and building thatmade him aware of the consequences of design choices. The waysvernacular architecture of Sernikaki considers the effects of climaticconditions on the buildings’ envelope suggests knowledge of thebuilding physics at an empirical level. This empirical knowledgepertains to basic concepts of thermal properties and of heattransfer, air movement and solar geometry.

E

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

T3. Sernikaki: a Greek vernacular settlement in Phokida

3.1. Location and history

Sernikaki is a mountainous village located in Phokida, inmainland Greece, 6 km Southeast of Amfissa with approximately300 inhabitants (Fig. 1). It is located at 22� 230 6000 East longitude,38� 280 6000 North latitude and at an altitude of 307 m above sealevel. It is one of the oldest vernacular settlements established inthe area around the ancient olive plantation of Amfissa. It wasrelatively isolated throughout its historical course, and thus pro-tected from outside influences. The smooth development of thebuilt environment was frequently interrupted by earthquakes, themost recent ones being in 1870 and 1894, which caused enormousdestruction along the region. Most of the houses date back to thesecond half of the 19th century and they have totally replaced olderstructures or been added to older house-cores.

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

RREC3.2. Climatic data

Due to its location Sernikaki enjoys a moderate climate withwarm summers and moderately cold winters. Getting correctclimatic data of Sernikaki is not easy since it is a village withouta meteorological station. The climatic data shown in Table 1 usesthe nearest station data, about 60 km away. Air temperature rea-ches a mean maximum of 27.1 �C and a mean minimum of 8.3 �C.The summer months have an average temperature of 26.2 �C, whilethe winter months have an average temperature of 9 �C. The annual

UNCO

Fig. 1. Overview of the settlement.

Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

DPROOF

average temperature is about 17 �C and the relative humidity variesfrom 55% to 78%. North easterly winds characterize the warmseason, thus bringing warmth, while the cold season is character-ized by strong North westerly winds [5].

3.3. Mahoney indicators

The climatic data has been incorporated in the Mahoney Tableswhich provide preliminary design recommendations. They aregrouped under eight headings: layout, spacing, air movement,openings, position of openings, protection of openings, walls, androofs. The following is a summary of the recommendations forSernikaki: a) Layout: buildings oriented on an east–west axis toreduce sun exposure; b) Spacing: compact planning; c) Air move-ment: rooms double-banked with temporary means for windpassage; d) Openings: medium-sized openings, 20–40% of wallarea; e) Position of openings: openings in north and south walls atbody height on windward elevation, as well as including openingsin internal walls; f) Protection of openings: protection from directsunlight; g) Walls: high mass; and h) Roofs: high mass [6].

4. Analysis of the built environment

Sernikaki has a strong vernacular character of great interest,both morphologically and structurally, with a unique landscapepattern. This study examines the most important architecturalforms found in Sernikaki that played a significant role in theevolution of vernacular architecture in Phokida and which aresubject to preservation. The collected data is the outcome ofpersonal field work, i.e., the author measured, sketched, observed,and interviewed inhabitants, local designers as well as public andprivate experts relating to the energy aspects of the buildings.

4.1. Typological analysis

In the microcosm of Sernikaki, certain types of mainland Greekdwellings were introduced to central Greece by building guilds.These types of dwellings gradually evolved according to the needs ofthe population. Dwellings were the result of collaboration amongmany people over many generations including collaborationbetween builders and owners. In Sernikaki, there is clarity in thegeneral layout of the dwellings both in its architectural synthesis aswell as in its structural formation; the building envelope is simple,clear, and easy to grasp. Two main themes are constant, i.e., massivebuilding forms and extensive courtyards. A thorough investigation ofthe existing dwellings of Sernikaki, resulted in the identification offour major types of buildings and their respective variations. Theclassification and typological analysis is based on functional char-acteristics, i.e., use-patterns and variations of the basic form (Table 2).

4.2. Site planning

Sernikaki developed in response to orientation, wind direction,and topography (Fig. 2). It has a clear-cut organization that definesthe use of space and determines the distinction between public andprivate areas. Dwellings are detached with extensive courtyardsand sinuous streets of varying shape, width, and position (flat,inclined or stepped with stone stairways) that connect buildings toone another (Fig. 3). The main zones of circulation are found at thelower level whereas several secondary ones of smaller size connectthe building in other levels. A number of relationships and sizeratios between streets and houses are recorded, all indicative of thehuman scale of the settlement (Fig. 4).

As for the private gardens, they are pleasant spaces whereoutdoor activities take place almost throughout the year. Dwellingsand gardens have developed in harmony and interdependence.


Table 1Climatic data

Season Winter Spring Summer Autumn

Month December January February March April May June July August September October November

Mean temperature (�C) 9.6 8.3 9.2 11.5 15.1 20.3 24.7 27.1 26.9 23 17.9 13.1Max. temperature (�C) 14.8 13.6 14.5 16.9 20.5 25.9 30.4 33.2 33.6 29.8 24.4 18.9Min. temperature (�C) 4.9 3.4 3.9 5.6 8.3 12.3 15.6 17.5 17.7 15 11.5 8Amount of rainfall (mm) 160.3 116.4 109.3 82.8 60.6 42.9 22.1 14.2 15.3 46.8 100.5 160Relative humidity (%) 78.4 75.1 72.8 70 68 63.2 57.5 55.1 55.9 63 69.7 77.6Days of Rainfall 15.8 13.1 12.5 12.4 11.6 8.6 4.4 2.4 3.2 5.3 5.4 12.9Average wind speed 3.3 3.7 4.4 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.1Prevailing wind direction NW NW NW NW NE NE NE NE NE NE NW NW

V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12 3


242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

Extensive tall adobe/stone walls define the boundaries betweenpublic and private spaces (Fig. 5). Gardens have either flat orstepped terraces depending on the topography and usually containpaved areas, a well, auxiliary buildings, an orchard, flowerbeds andeven an arched trellis usually covered with vines (Fig. 6). Theirshape, size and location vary according to the tall walls of theboundaries of each site by which they are defined. There are twodistinct plan layouts identified: one with entrances on the northside, directly from the street, and one with entrances on the southside, through the garden.

E332

333

334

335

336

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

365

366

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

UNCORRECT

4.3. Construction materials and techniques

The building materials used are: adobe (sun dried mud bricks)and mortar of the same material as the adobe units, stone, andtimber. The most common building method in Sernikaki is a mixedmanner of construction, with stone used for the whole groundfloor, or part of it, and adobe used for the floor above (Fig. 7)

The main building material used for constructing the load-bearing walls of the dwellings was adobe, since earth is the mostplentiful resource in the region. Adobe units were made of earth,usually red earth, or whatever kind could be found on site, mixedwith straw along with water, pressed in wooden moulds and driedin the hot sun for a few days until they were ready to be used forconstruction [7]. The adobe walls have a thickness of 0.60–0.70 cmand an average height of 8.00 m. They were built with horizontallyset timber ties of various dimensions (6 cm� 8 cm or10 cm� 12 cm), spaced at 0.70–0.90 cm. These timber ties goaround the buildings, ensuring that the structures are solid andresistant to earthquakes. The creation of these horizontal ties atregular intervals permitted the continuation of construction athigher levels even though the mortar at the lower levels was not yetdried and solidified. Such constructional methods protected againstsudden subsidence and cracking of the walls. The first set of timberties was usually placed above a stone base in order to be protectedfrom humidity and water. Thus, in most cases stone construction(0.60–0.70 cm) forms a base of approximately 0.90 cm in heightabove the ground level on which the bearing adobe walls rest.

The mezzanine floor of the dwellings consists of the ‘‘patera’’(beams that bear the wooden floor) placed right above the timberties in holes 0.30–0.50 cm apart in the walls. They are usually madeof cypress and are of circular cross-section 0.35 cm in diameter and8.00–10.00 m in length. The boards, planks of hard wood werenailed to the beams [7].

The interior partition walls called ‘‘tsatmas,’’ were built up fromthe wooden floor and were very light in construction. They hada width of around 10 cm and consisted of a wooden frame ofnarrow straight laths placed horizontally every 40 cm. The emptyspaces in between were filled with bits of wood, cane, seaweed orshavings. The walls had a top layer of plaster, which covered all theempty spaces, and made them look like ordinary walls despite theirbeing extremely light [7].


ROOFThe roofs were most often four pitched: oak, juniper, pine and

cypress; common timber types used for the roof structure. Theload-bearing walls support the roof frame placed above the timberties at this position. The final layer of the roof comprises of woodenboards and clay tiles that are placed on the top boards. The rooftiles, usually of the Byzantine type, were placed on top planks. Theempty space under the roof was never used as a loft, and the roofhad a small slope. The ceiling underneath was constructed withboards, 2 or 3 cm thick. The empty space between the ceiling andthe roof, called ‘‘katarraktis,’’ provided natural ventilation [7].

DP5. Evaluation

5.1. Architectural typology and building physics

Vernacular dwellings of Sernikaki are evaluated in terms ofbuilding physics criteria that pertain to solar geometry, thermalmass, heat transfer, air movement, and solar geometry. Moreover,the evaluation is based on the design variables proposed byMahoney as the ones that promote the creation of buildingsresponsive to the climate. These are: a) the layout of the buildings(orientation in relation to sun and wind, aspect ratio); b) spacing(site planning); c) air movement; d) openings (size–position,protection); and e) building envelope (walls: construction mate-rials-thickness, roof construction detailing) [6].

5.1.1. LayoutOrientation: Dwellings are oriented on a 30� north–east axis.Aspect ratio: The term ‘‘aspect ratio’’ is used to denote the ratio

of the longer dimension of a rectangular plan to the shorter. TheN/W and S/E walls are longer than the N/E and S/W and the ‘‘aspectratio’’ varies from 1.0 to 2.0.

5.1.2. SpacingSite planning: Detached dwellings of compact geometry and

extensive courtyards are designed considering climate conditions(Fig. 8). Gardens provide shady and cool places that become themain living units of the summer months (Fig. 9). The use of gardensalong with their associated landscape features (trees, flowerbeds,vine trellises, soft ground surfaces) and their appropriate placingserves as an additional climate modifier, ensuring human comfortboth indoors and outdoors [8].

5.1.3. Air movementProvision of fresh air: The rooms of the dwellings are provided

with sufficient natural ventilation through the appropriate place-ment of the openings to take advantage of breezes as well asthrough their sizes in relation to the size of the room. The woodenexternal shutters are often used as controlled natural ventilation. Inaddition they are able to control the sunlight. There is also provi-sion for ventilation in the empty space – ‘‘katarraktis’’ – betweenthe ceiling and the roof that adds to the overall cooling [7].


UNCORRECTEDPROOF

Tab

le2

Typ

olog

ical

anal

ysis

Typ

esof

dw

elli

ngs

Arc

hit

ectu

ral

typ

olog

yA

rch

itec

tura

lel

emen

ts

Plan

sch

eme

Des

crip

tion

Typ

esof

open

ings

Ia�

On

est

orey

�A

llac

tivi

ties

take

pla

cein

one

room

Ib

�Tw

ost

orie

su

nit

�Th

egr

oun

dfl

oor

isu

sed

asw

orki

ng

pla

ce�

The

firs

tfl

oor

isu

sed

asre

sid

ence

�A

llac

tivi

ties

take

pla

cein

one

room

�A

nex

teri

orw

ood

enor

ston

est

airc

ase

lead

sto

the

firs

tfl

oor

IIa

�Th

ree-

stor

ies

un

it�

The

bas

emen

tan

dth

egr

oun

dfl

oor

are

use

das

wor

kin

gp

lace

�Th

efi

rst

floo

ris

use

das

resi

den

ce�

All

acti

viti

esta

kep

lace

inon

ero

om�

An

exte

rior

woo

den

orst

one

stai

rcas

ele

ads

toth

efi

rst

floo

r

IIb

�Tw

ost

orie

su

nit

�Th

egr

oun

dfl

oor

isu

sed

asw

orki

ng

pla

ce�

The

firs

tfl

oor

isu

sed

asre

sid

ence

.It

isd

ivid

edin

totw

oro

oms:

a‘‘s

ala’

’(li

vin

gro

om)

and

afa

mil

yro

om�

An

exte

rior

woo

den

orst

one

stai

rcas

ele

ads

toth

efi

rst

floo

r



Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architecturaltypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026

374

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

385

386

387

388

389

390

391

392

393

394

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

448

449

450

451

452

453

454

455

456

457

458

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

472

473

474

475

476

477

478

479

480

481

482

483

484

485

486

487

488

489

490

491

492

493

494

495

496

497

498

499

500

501

502

503

504

505

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

IIc

� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into two room: a ‘‘sala’’ (living room) and

a family room� An exterior wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor

IIIa1

� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as a working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into two room: a ‘‘sala’’ and a family room� An exterior wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor

IIIa2

� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into four rooms separated by a corridor.

Bedrooms are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor

IIIa3

� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into four asymmetrical rooms. Bedrooms

are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor

(continued on next page)

V.Anna-M

aria/

Buildingand

Environment

xxx(2008)

1–125

AR

TIC

LE

INP

RE

SS

BAE2127_p

roof�

15Octo

ber

2008�

5/12

Pleasecite

this

articlein

pressas:

An

na-M

ariaV

,Evaluation

ofa

sustainable

Greek

vernacularsettlem

ent

and

itslan

dscape:A

rchitecturaltypology

and

building

physics,Building

and

Environm

ent

(2008),doi:10.1016/j.builden

v.2008.05.026

506

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

514

515

516

517

518

519

520

521

522

523

524

525

526

527

528

529

530

531

532

533

534

535

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

545

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

560

561

562

563

564

565

566

567

568

569

570

571

572

573

574

575

576

577

578

579

580

581

582

583

584

585

586

587

588

589

590

591

592

593

594

595

596

597

598

599

600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614

615

616

617

618

619

620

621

622

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

Table 2 (continued)

Types ofdwellings

Architectural typology Architectural elements

Plan scheme Description Types of openings

IIIa4

� Three-stories unit� The basement and the ground floor are used as working places� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into three rooms separated by a corridor.


IIIb1

� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into three rooms separated by a corridor.


IIIb2

� Three-stories unit� The basement is used as working place� The ground floor and the first floor are used as residence. An interior wooden staircase

connects the two floors. Bedrooms are on the ground floor, whereas a ‘‘sala’’ is found onthe first floor� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor

IV

� Two stories unit� The ground floor and the first floor are used as residence. An interior wooden staircase

connects the two floors. Living rooms are on the ground floor whereas bedrooms are onthe first floor.

V.Anna-M

aria/

Buildingand

Environment

xxx(2008)

1–126

AR

TIC

LE

INP

RE

SS

BAE2127_p

roof�

15Octo

ber

2008�

6/12

Pleasecite

this

articlein

pressas:

An

na-M

ariaV

,Evaluation

ofa

sustainable

Greek

vernacular

settlemen

tan

dits

landscape:

Arch

itecturaltypology

and

building

physics,Building

and

Environmen

t(20

08),doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.20

08.05.026

638

639

640

641

642

643

644

645

646

647

648

649

650

651

652

653

654

655

656

657

658

659

660

661

662

663

664

665

666

667

668

669

670

671

672

673

674

675

676

677

678

679

680

681

682

683

684

685

686

687

688

689

690

691

692

693

694

695

696

697

698

699

700

701

702

703

704

705

706

707

708

709

710

711

712

713

714

715

716

717

718

719

720

721

722

723

724

725

726

727

728

729

730

731

732

733

734

735

736

737

738

739

740

741

742

743

744

745

746

747

748

749

750

751

752

753

754

755

756

757

758

759

760

761

762

763

764

765

766

767

768

769

E

OF

Fig. 2. Plan of the settlement.Fig. 4. The human scale of the settlement.



770

771

772

773

774

775

776

777

778

779

780

781

782

783

784

785

786

787

788

789

790

791

792

793

794

795

796

797

798

799

800

801

802

803

804

805

806

807

808

809

810

811

812

813

814

815

816

817

818

819

820

821

822

823

824

825

826

827

828

829

830

831

832

833

834

835

836

837

838

839

840

841

842

843

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851

852

853

854

855

856

857

858

859

860

861

862

863

864

865

866

867

868

869

870

871

872

873

874

875

876

877

878

879

880

RRECT

5.1.4. OpeningsSize–position of openings: Openings are placed according to

sun orientation, topography, views, and wind patterns. Their types,proportions and sizes are determined by the orientation of theirwall. Thus, optimum views, natural lighting and cooling breezes areachieved with suitable orientation, design and geometry of theopenings as well as their juxtaposition. There are several S/Eopenings of relatively big size whereas those facing N/W are fewerand of small size. There are a very small number of windows ofsmall size facing south–west and several openings in the north-eastern façades. In addition, their placement on a 30� north–eastaxis, facing the direction of the wind, provides natural ventilationfrom prevailing breezes in summer. The sizes of the openings arerelatively small in relation to room area, and the ratio between theirwidth and length is about 1:2 (Table 2).

Protection of the openings: Protection of the openings fromsolar radiation during summer is also achieved with the use ofmovable shading devices such as wooden external shutters thatpermit the dwelling to be fully shaded during the summer but fullyexposed to solar radiation in winter. Such devices are: blinds andlattices, curtains, vertical shafts, external horizontal shades, andshutters. Since openings are directly related to thermal comfort indwellings that have walls of high thermal inertia, the way they arehandled is of vital importance. Windows are supposed to have their

UNCO

Fig. 3. Dwellings detached with extensive courtyards and sinuous streets (VaryingShape, Width and Position).


DPRO

shutters totally closed during the warmest hours of the day, notletting in either the light or the heat from the outside (Fig. 10).Other protecting shading devices used along with the external onesare: blinds, lattices, and curtains found in the interior of thedwellings. It is also interesting to note that the amount of sunlightentering the interior of the house is further reduced by placing thewindow frame inside the window recess (Table 2).

Open spaces, such as balconies (Fig. 11) or ‘‘hagiatia’’ (Fig. 12),are architectural components of bulky volumes under various

Fig. 5. Extensive tall walls defining the boundary between public and private spaces.


881

882

883

884

885

886

887

888

889

890

891

892

893

894

895

896

897

898

899

900

901

PROOF

Fig. 6. Various gardens.



902

903

904

905

906

907

908

909

910

911

912

913

914

915

916

917

918

919

920

921

922

923

924

925

926

927

928

929

930

931

932

933

934

935

936

937

938

939

940

941

942

943

944

945

946

947

948

949

950

951

952

953

954

955

956

957

958

959

960

961

962

963

964

965

966

967

968

969

970

971

972

973

974

975

976

977

978

979

980

981

982

983

984

985

986

987

988

989

990

991

992

993

994

995

forms creating pronounced shade on the sun-warmed facades,changing the current of air, and protecting from rain exposure. Theyare usually south and east oriented, providing a thermal refuge anda place of transition from inwards to outwards. The principledifference between balcony and ‘‘hagiati’’ is their respective size,the latter being larger than the former (2.00–3.00 m wide toprovide for outdoor functions). Moreover, the ‘‘hagiati’’ is covered

UNCORRECTED

Fig. 7. Sernikaki’s mixed manner of construction-stone ground floor and adobe forfloors above.

Fig. 8. Detached dwelling of compact geometry and extensive courtyard.

Fig. 9. Vine trellis close to the dwelling providing shade during the summer.

Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architecturaltypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026

996

997

998

999

1000

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1019

1020

1021

1022

1023

1024

1025

1026

1027

1028

1029

1030

1031

1032

1033

TEDPROOF

Fig. 10. Openings having their shutters closed during the warmest hours of the day.

Fig. 11. Various balconies.

Fig. 12. Various ‘‘Hagiatia’’.



1034

1035

1036

1037

1038

1039

1040

1041

1042

1043

1044

1045

1046

1047

1048

1049

1050

1051

1052

1053

1054

1055

1056

1057

1058

1059

1060

1061

1062

1063

1064

1065

1066

1067

1068

1069

1070

1071

1072

1073

1074

1075

1076

1077

1078

1079

1080

1081

1082

1083

1084

1085

1086

1087

1088

1089

1090

1091

1092

1093

1094

1095

1096

1097

1098

1099

1100

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1107

1108

1109

1110

1111

1112

1113

1114

1115

1116

1117

1118

1119

1120

1121

1122

1123

1124

1125

1126

1127

1128

1129

1130

1131

1132

1133

1134

1135

1136

1137

1138

1139

1140

1141

1142

1143

1144

1145

1146

1147

1148

1149

1150

1151

1152

1153

1154

1155

1156

1157

1158

1159

1160

1161

1162

1163

1164

1165

UNCORRECby a roof that is angled away from the main roof to best reduce solar

admittance.

5.1.5. Building envelopeWalls: Thick walls made of adobe form the most common

external walls. The wall section has a thickness of 0.60–0.70 cm anda low U-value (U¼ 1.02); hence it serves as a good insulator [9]. Thetime lag of these walls is high; they store heat during the daytimeand radiate it into the room at night when the outside temperatureis below the comfort range [10,11]. The light colored surfaces of thefaçades are used as a mechanism for the protection of the highthermal mass walls against solar radiation as they absorb less heatin summer, thus preventing the rise of internal temperatures.

Roofs: Consistent with the use of high thermal capacity verticalenvelopes, dwellings use roof construction materials and detailingthat possess medium thermal capacities (K¼ 1.5) [12].

Table 3 evaluates all types of dwellings by their layout, spacing,air movement, openings, and building envelope (Table 3). Dwell-ings are oriented on a 30� north–east axis; and, in most cases, theirN/W & S/E walls are slightly longer than the N/E & S/W. It can beassumed that such an orientation is preferred to the east–west axissuggested by the Mahoney Tables as the most suitable to providemaximum environmental comfort that work with the elements ofsunshine, light, air, and indoor temperatures. All types of dwellingsuse compact geometry as much as possible, which providesmaximum volume with minimum area exposed to the sun. Thepreference for compact built forms, along with the use of envelopematerials with high thermal capacities, aligns with the recom-mendations in the Mahoney Tables to maximize heat storage.Moreover, they are organized so that they are detached withextensive courtyards rather than attached as suggested in the


Mahoney Tables. The extensive tall garden walls that define theboundaries between public and private spaces seem to function ascontinuous windbreaks, especially during winter. The MahoneyTables suggest rooms double-banked with temporary means forwind passage. Contrary to this suggestion, the floor plan ofthe dwellings representative of the older vernacular types is


UNCORRECTEDPROOF

Table 3Evaluation of the architectural typology and building physics

Types of residence Layout Spacing Air movement Openings Building envelope

Orientation

Aspect ratio Site planning Plan layout Size–Position Protection Walls Roofs

Ia 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard

Single-bankedSE: 12.5%, NW: –, SW: 10.5%,NE: 9.5%

External woodenshutters

Adobe–stonewalls of high thermal mass

Roofs of mediumthermal mass

Ib 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard

Single-bankedSE: 13.0%, NW: –, SW: –,NE: 11%

External wooden shuttersHagiati at the E. side



IIa 1.40DetachedExtensivecourtyard

Single-bankedSE: 10.5%, NW: 8.0%, SW: –,NE: 7.5%

External woodenshutters

Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass


IIb 1.60DetachedExtensivecourtyard

Single-bankedSE: 19.0%, NW: –, SW: –,NE: 11.0%

External wooden shuttersBalcony at the S. side



IIc 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard


External wooden shuttersHagiati at the S.E. side



IIIa1 1.60DetachedExtensivecourtyard


External wooden shuttersBalcony at the E. side




Double-bankedAxial corridor

SE: 22%, NW: 9.0%, SW: –,NE: 4.4%

External wooden shuttersBalcony at the N. sideHagiati at the S. side




Double-bankedAxial corridor

SE: 19.8%, NW: 8.7%, SW: –,NE: 13.9%

Balconies at bothS. & E. sides



V.Anna-M

aria/

Buildingand

Environment

xxx(2008)

1–1210

AR

TIC

LE

INP

RE

SS

BAE2127_p

roof�

15Octo

ber

2008�

10/12

Pleasecite

this

articlein

pressas:

An

na-M

ariaV

,Evaluation

ofa

sustainable

Greek

vernacular

settlemen

tan

dits

landscape:

Arch

itecturaltypology

and

building

physics,Building

and

Environmen

t(20

08),doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.20

08.05.026

1166

1167

1168

1169

1170

1171

1172

1173

1174

1175

1176

1177

1178

1179

1180

1181

1182

1183

1184

1185

1186

1187

1188

1189

1190

1191

1192

1193

1194

1195

1196

1197

1198

1199

1200

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1214

1215

1216

1217

1218

1219

1220

1221

1222

1223

1224

1225

1226

1227

1228

1229

1230

1231

1232

1233

1234

1235

1236

1237

1238

1239

1240

1241

1242

1243

1244

1245

1246

1247

1248

1249

1250

1251

1252

1253

1254

1255

1256

1257

1258

1259

1260

1261

1262

1263

1264

1265

1266

1267

1268

1269

1270

1271

1272

1273

1274

1275

1276

1277

1278

1279

1280

1281

1282

1283

1284

1285

1286

1287

1288

1289

1290

1291

1292

1293

1294

1295

1296

1297

UNCORRECTE

3

IIIa

41.

30

Det

ach

edEx

ten

sive

cou

rtya

rd

Dou

ble

-ban

ked

Axi

alco

rrid

orSE

:2

3.0

%,

NW

:12

.0%

,SW

:10

.8%

,NE:

6.0

%B

alco

nie

sat

bot

hS.

&N

.sid

esA

dob

e–st

one

wal

lsof

hig

hth

erm

alm

ass

Roo

fsof

med

ium

ther

mal

mas

s

IIIb

11.

80

Det

ach

edEx

ten

sive

cou

rtya

rdSi

ngl

e-b

anke

dSE

:11

.9%

,N

W:

5.3

%,S

W:

–,N

E:10

.68

%

Bal

con

ies

atb

oth

S.&

N.s

ides

Hag

iati

atth

eE.

sid

e

Ad

obe–

ston

ew

alls

ofh

igh

ther

mal

mas

sR

oofs

ofm

ediu

mth

erm

alm

ass

IIIb

22

.00

Det

ach

edEx

ten

sive

cou

rtya

rdSi

ngl

e-b

anke

dSE

:12

.8%

,NW

:3

.56

%,S

W:

2.5

7%

,N

E:7.

7%

Bal

con

yat

the

S.si

de

Hag

iati

atth

eS.

sid

e

Ad

obe–

ston

ew

alls

ofh

igh

ther

mal

mas

sR

oofs

ofm

ediu

mth

erm

alm

ass

IV1.

30

Det

ach

edEx

ten

sive

cou

rtya

rd

Dou

ble

-ban

ked

Axi

alco

rrid

orSE

:2

3.8

%,N

W:

7.4

%,S

W:

8.3

%,

NE:

18.8

%B

alco

nie

sat

the

N.S

.&E.

sid

esA

dob

e–st

one

wal

lsof

hig

hth

erm

alm

ass

Roo

fsof

med

ium

ther

mal

mas

s




1298

1299

1300

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1312

1313

1314

1315

1316

1317

1318

1319

1320

1321

1322

1323

1324

1325

1326

1327

1328

1329

1330

1331

1332

1333

1334

1335

1336

1337

1338

1339

1340

1341

1342

1343

1344

1345

1346

1347

1348

1349

1350

1351

1352

1353

1354

1355

1356

1357

1358

1359

1360

1361

1362

1363

1364

1365

1366

1367

1368

1369

1370

1371

1372

1373

1374

1375

1376

1377

1378

1379

F

single-banked (one room wide) whereas the floor plan of thedwellings representative of neoclassical architecture adapted to thevernacular architectural idiom of QSernikakaki (types: IIa2, IIa3, IIa4,and IV) is double-banked (two rooms wide) with an axial corridorfor wind passage. The openings in the vertical envelope aremodestly sized, equaling between 10–20% of the vertical surfacearea, a lower percentage than the one suggested in the MahoneyTables. The need for openings in the vertical envelope is based onproviding contact with the outside, admitting light, and permittingventilation of the building interior. Thus, several S/E and N/Eopenings have been chosen to provide the best exploitation ofwinter solar radiation whereas N/W and S/W openings are fewerand of small size. In addition, architectural components such asbalconies, ‘‘hagiatia,’’ and external wooden shutters are employedto reduce solar admittance, a design guideline also suggested in theMahoney Tables.

1380

1381

1382

1383

1384

1385

1386

1387

1388

1389

1390

1391

1392

1393

1394

1395

1396

1397

1398

1399

1400

1401

1402

1403

1404

1405

DPROO

5.2. Sernikaki: a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement

The fact that Sernikaki has maintained its qualities for morethan a hundred years suggests that the techniques of itsconstruction and the building materials employed were wellthought professional choices aiming at sustainability. Moreover,traditional builders did not only aim at achieving comfort withoutthe need of any mechanical systems, but were also concerned aboutenergy, material costs, as well as the impact of the buildings on theenvironment. This becomes obvious by their use of recyclablematerials.

Therefore, the vernacular architecture of Sernikaki can bedefined as sustainable. The criteria that lead to the creation of sucha sustainable vernacular settlement are: 1) holistic consideration ofnegative environmental impacts that arise in the construction ofbuildings and their infrastructures; 2) design recommendations,which minimize the adverse environmental effects in building; 3)use of materials with low maintenance and energy efficiency; 4)selection of building materials that provide thermal comfort; 5) useof renewable and natural resources; 6) reduction of energyconsumption by maximizing passive thermal comfort; 7) concernfor integral quality: economic, social and environmental perfor-mance; 8) improvement of environmental quality; and 9) provisionfor comfortable living spaces [13].

1406

1407

1408

1409

1410

1411

1412

1413

1414

1415

1416

1417

1418

1419

1420

1421

1422

1423

1424

1425

1426

1427

1428

1429

6. Present-day condition of Sernikaki

Today, Sernikaki is relatively untouched. However, additions tothe traditional dwellings or new constructions added to thevernacular core are being built with little consideration of theclimate since they depend heavily on mechanical systems to providethermal comfort. Specific guidelines, codes, regulations and legis-lations for restoring and preserving such an important vernacularsettlement have not been precisely set. Government regulations aremainly concerned with the preservation of the outer shell of build-ings, and therefore direct the owners to preserve only architecturalfacades at the expense of many other important qualities of thebuildings such as the ones discussed in this paper. Additions andrestorations are made with no concrete guidelines and usually occurwhen the dwellings fall into disuse and decay. This tendencythreatens to change the entire character of the settlement unlesscurrent architectural practices incorporate the above exploredguidelines that provide recommendations on the orientation andlayout of buildings, the size and position of the openings, and thecharacteristics of walls and roofs. Such an embedded understandingof vernacular architecture may serve as a model for sustainabledesign in response to climate, energy use and notions of environ-mental quality [14].


E4



1430

1431

1432

1433

1434

1435

1436

1437

1438

1439

1440

1441

1442

1443

1444

1445

1446

1447

1448

1449

1450

1451

1452

1453

1454

1455

1456

1457

1458

1459

1460

1461

1462

1463

1464

1465

1466

1467

1468

1469

1470

1471

1472

1473

1474

1475

1476

1477

1478

1479

1480

1481

1482

1483

1484

1485

1486

1487

1488

1489

1490

1491

1492

1493

1494

1495

7. Conclusions

Sernikaki is a vernacular Greek settlement that takes advantageof its climate through the appropriate application of designelements and building technology for energy preservation as wellfor ensuring comfortable dwelling conditions. This paper wasconcerned with the layout of the buildings (orientation in relationto sun and wind, aspect ratio), the spacing (site planning), the airmovement, the openings (size–position, protection), and thebuilding envelope (walls: construction materials-thickness, roofconstruction detailing). It evaluated specific vernacular dwellingtypes and their response to climate, based on design principles thatcould be adapted to current architectural practice in the area, inorder to optimize, the relationship between site, building andclimate.

This paper attempts to reveal the secrets applied in suchdurable, compatible, elegant, reliable and eco-efficient buildings inSernikaki. It can be presumed that these vernacular characteristicsgenerate climatic benefits since people who had lived in them buthave recently moved into new buildings complain that the newbuildings are not as comfortable as the traditional ones. Therefore,they can form design recommendations that could be incorporatedinto current architectural practices in the area.

The dwellings of Sernikaki demonstrate an economical use oflocal building resources, and respond to climatic conditions usinglow-energy design principles that provide human comfort. Thesedesign principles are consistent with the form, orientation andmateriality of the buildings. Their combination of engineering andarchitecture reveals an aesthetic quality which, instead of imposingon the environment it emanates from it. The study of thesedwellings, on the one hand helps to better understand theirdevelopment, and on the other, provides examples of a sustainablebuilding tradition, from which many lessons can be learned.

UNCORRECT


Associating bioclimatic design with vernacular typology mayindicate design recommendations, which can be replicated not onlyas a gesture of respect towards tradition but also for its essentialvalue of providing the region with buildings which by beingclimatically responsive are also energy efficient.

DPROOF

References

[1] Coch H. Bioclimatism in vernacular architecture. Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews 1996;2(1–2):67–87.

[2] Balaras C, Gaglia A, Georgopoulou E, Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Lalas D. Euro-pean residential building and empirical assessment of the Hellenic buildingstock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings. Buildingand Environment 2007;42:1298–314.

[3] Kolokotroni M, Young AN. Guidelines for bioclimatic housing design in Greece.Building and Environment 1990;25(4):297–307.

[4] Szokolay S. Introduction to architectural science: the basis of sustainabledesign. London: Elsevier Ltd.; 2004.

[5] EMY. Climatic records of Greece: Department of Meteorology.[6] Heerwagen D. Passive and active environmental controls: informing the

schematic designing of buildings. McGraw-Hill; 2004.[7] Kouremenos K. In: Philippides D, editor. Phokida, in Greek traditional archi-

tecture. Greece: Melissa Publishing House; 1989. Q[8] Brown RGillespie T. Microclimatic landscape design: creating thermal comfort

and energy efficiency. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1995.[9] Oikonomou A. Summer thermal comfort in traditional buildings of the 19th

century in Florina, north-western Greece. In: International conference‘‘Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment’’; 2005. p. 239–44.

[10] Parra-Saldivar ML, Batty W. Thermal behavior of adobe constructions. Buildingand Environment 2006;41:1892–904.

[11] Eben Saleh MA. Adobe as a thermal regulating material. Solar &Wind Tech-nology 1990;7(4):407–16.

[12] Evangelinos E, Zacharopoulos E. Thermal value of the building shell in tradi-tional buildings. Design and Art in Greece 1989;20:52–3.

[13] Godfaurd J, Clements-Croome D, Jeronimidis G. Sustainable building solutions:a review of lessons from the natural world. Building and Environment2005;40(3):319–28.

[14] Asquith l, Vellinga M. Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century:theory, education and practice. London & New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006.


Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural typology...

Documents

Transcript of Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural typology...