Q1
Q2
lable at ScienceDirect
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12
BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 1/12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Contents lists avai
Building and Environment
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/bui ldenv
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
OF
Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape:Architectural typology and building physics
Vissilia Anna-Maria*
Architect-Landscape Architect, Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Structural Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Civil Engineering, Kodrou 13, 105 58 Athens, Greece
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 17 September 2007Received in revised form 14 May 2008Accepted 15 May 2008
Keywords:Vernacular architectureAdobe (mud brick)SustainableBioclimatic designBuilding physicsLandscape
* Tel.: þ30 210 3246897; fax: þ30 210 3246734.E-mail address: [email protected]
0360-1323/$ – see front matter � 2008 Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Mtypology and building physics, Building and
78
79
80
81
TEDPROa b s t r a c tSernikaki is a Greek vernacular settlement that can be imagined as a living organism is the outcome ofcenturies of optimization of material use, construction techniques and climate considerations. Beingmountainous and isolated, this small vernacular settlement has preserved old types of dwellings longerthan other areas in Phokida, in mainland Greece, and it can, thus, provide rich material for the under-standing of architectural continuity and evolution. In this study, various types of adobe dwellings aresurveyed and their response to climate, in terms of site and building design, is evaluated. In addition, thetechniques of creating microclimatic conditions by incorporating the existing environmental parametersinto the design are considered. Bioclimatic design employs appropriate technologies and design principlesbased on a thoughtful approach to climate and environment. It is concerned with the layout of the buildings(orientation in relation to sun and wind, aspect ratio), the spacing (site planning), the air movement, theopenings (size–position, protection), and the building envelope (walls: construction materials-thickness,roof construction detailing). This paper evaluates specific vernacular dwelling types and their response toclimate, based on passive design principles that could be adapted to current architectural practice in thearea, in order to optimize the relationship between site, building and climate.
� 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
82
83
C84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
UNCORRE1. Introduction
The architecture of vernacular settlements reflects Greek life-style and cultural values of the past. These building types and theirsite planning have evolved through time and they have reachedtheir form and layout through trial and error methods. They wereable to respond to the needs of their inhabitants, the climaticconditions, and the topography, because of the simplicity of thebuilding processes, the techniques and the local materialsemployed (adobe, stone and timber).
In the vernacular architecture of Sernikaki one can easilyobserve an absence of purely conceptual and aesthetic purposes,and a focus on a holistic approach that considers the role of theenvironment as a major one, within the limits of the resourcesavailable. Within this view, the traditional builders were concernedwith a variety of parameters that affected a building as well as withthe quality of the building itself. Traditionally designed buildingsare often considered as the predecessors of modern bioclimaticdesign [1]. They display years of embodied experience built on therelationship between building and climate, implying a logicalanalysis, the consideration of appropriate principles, and a rational
All rights reserved.
aria V, Evaluation of a sustaiEnvironment (2008), doi:10
use of resources. These buildings, therefore, can be studied asmodels of environmentally responsive and sustainable architec-ture. In our days, the need for energy thrift design has been wellunderstood and for this purpose appropriate regulations have beendrafted [2,3]. There is also a greater awareness of the importance ofthe socio cultural identity of a place. Both issues make the study ofvernacular settlements, such as Sernikaki, very important.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the Greek vernacularsettlement of Sernikaki, in terms of its architectural typology andbuilding physics. This paper shows that such a building environ-ment acts as a living organism that is inherently sustainablethrough the use of various bioclimatic concepts applied in itsoriginal construction, is tightly integrated with the landscape andhas a minimum waste of resources. The subsequent analysis iscomprised of two major parts: 1) a study concerning the evolutionof the built environment (typological analysis, site planning,construction materials and techniques); and 2) an evaluation ofspecific vernacular dwelling types and their response to climate,based on passive design principles that are responsible for thebioclimatic character of the settlement.
105
106
107
108
109
2. Bioclimatic concepts and building physics
Bioclimatic design, by definition, satisfies the needs of humanbeings (thermal, luminous and acoustics). It considers climatic
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–122
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 2/12
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
conditions, uses techniques and materials available in the regionand attempts to integrate the building with its surroundings.Moreover, bioclimatic design relies on building physics, which isthe ability and knowledge of how to allow sunlight, heat, andairflow through the building envelope when necessary, at certainmoments of each day and month of the year [4].
The vernacular architecture of Sernikaki may be defined asbioclimatic since, it can be argued, the traditional builder of Ser-nikaki understood bioclimatic concepts, aspects of building physics,and the strong relationship between site, climate and building thatmade him aware of the consequences of design choices. The waysvernacular architecture of Sernikaki considers the effects of climaticconditions on the buildings’ envelope suggests knowledge of thebuilding physics at an empirical level. This empirical knowledgepertains to basic concepts of thermal properties and of heattransfer, air movement and solar geometry.
E
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
T3. Sernikaki: a Greek vernacular settlement in Phokida
3.1. Location and history
Sernikaki is a mountainous village located in Phokida, inmainland Greece, 6 km Southeast of Amfissa with approximately300 inhabitants (Fig. 1). It is located at 22� 230 6000 East longitude,38� 280 6000 North latitude and at an altitude of 307 m above sealevel. It is one of the oldest vernacular settlements established inthe area around the ancient olive plantation of Amfissa. It wasrelatively isolated throughout its historical course, and thus pro-tected from outside influences. The smooth development of thebuilt environment was frequently interrupted by earthquakes, themost recent ones being in 1870 and 1894, which caused enormousdestruction along the region. Most of the houses date back to thesecond half of the 19th century and they have totally replaced olderstructures or been added to older house-cores.
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
RREC3.2. Climatic data
Due to its location Sernikaki enjoys a moderate climate withwarm summers and moderately cold winters. Getting correctclimatic data of Sernikaki is not easy since it is a village withouta meteorological station. The climatic data shown in Table 1 usesthe nearest station data, about 60 km away. Air temperature rea-ches a mean maximum of 27.1 �C and a mean minimum of 8.3 �C.The summer months have an average temperature of 26.2 �C, whilethe winter months have an average temperature of 9 �C. The annual
UNCO
Fig. 1. Overview of the settlement.
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
DPROOF
average temperature is about 17 �C and the relative humidity variesfrom 55% to 78%. North easterly winds characterize the warmseason, thus bringing warmth, while the cold season is character-ized by strong North westerly winds [5].
3.3. Mahoney indicators
The climatic data has been incorporated in the Mahoney Tableswhich provide preliminary design recommendations. They aregrouped under eight headings: layout, spacing, air movement,openings, position of openings, protection of openings, walls, androofs. The following is a summary of the recommendations forSernikaki: a) Layout: buildings oriented on an east–west axis toreduce sun exposure; b) Spacing: compact planning; c) Air move-ment: rooms double-banked with temporary means for windpassage; d) Openings: medium-sized openings, 20–40% of wallarea; e) Position of openings: openings in north and south walls atbody height on windward elevation, as well as including openingsin internal walls; f) Protection of openings: protection from directsunlight; g) Walls: high mass; and h) Roofs: high mass [6].
4. Analysis of the built environment
Sernikaki has a strong vernacular character of great interest,both morphologically and structurally, with a unique landscapepattern. This study examines the most important architecturalforms found in Sernikaki that played a significant role in theevolution of vernacular architecture in Phokida and which aresubject to preservation. The collected data is the outcome ofpersonal field work, i.e., the author measured, sketched, observed,and interviewed inhabitants, local designers as well as public andprivate experts relating to the energy aspects of the buildings.
4.1. Typological analysis
In the microcosm of Sernikaki, certain types of mainland Greekdwellings were introduced to central Greece by building guilds.These types of dwellings gradually evolved according to the needs ofthe population. Dwellings were the result of collaboration amongmany people over many generations including collaborationbetween builders and owners. In Sernikaki, there is clarity in thegeneral layout of the dwellings both in its architectural synthesis aswell as in its structural formation; the building envelope is simple,clear, and easy to grasp. Two main themes are constant, i.e., massivebuilding forms and extensive courtyards. A thorough investigation ofthe existing dwellings of Sernikaki, resulted in the identification offour major types of buildings and their respective variations. Theclassification and typological analysis is based on functional char-acteristics, i.e., use-patterns and variations of the basic form (Table 2).
4.2. Site planning
Sernikaki developed in response to orientation, wind direction,and topography (Fig. 2). It has a clear-cut organization that definesthe use of space and determines the distinction between public andprivate areas. Dwellings are detached with extensive courtyardsand sinuous streets of varying shape, width, and position (flat,inclined or stepped with stone stairways) that connect buildings toone another (Fig. 3). The main zones of circulation are found at thelower level whereas several secondary ones of smaller size connectthe building in other levels. A number of relationships and sizeratios between streets and houses are recorded, all indicative of thehuman scale of the settlement (Fig. 4).
As for the private gardens, they are pleasant spaces whereoutdoor activities take place almost throughout the year. Dwellingsand gardens have developed in harmony and interdependence.
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
Table 1Climatic data
Season Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Month December January February March April May June July August September October November
Mean temperature (�C) 9.6 8.3 9.2 11.5 15.1 20.3 24.7 27.1 26.9 23 17.9 13.1Max. temperature (�C) 14.8 13.6 14.5 16.9 20.5 25.9 30.4 33.2 33.6 29.8 24.4 18.9Min. temperature (�C) 4.9 3.4 3.9 5.6 8.3 12.3 15.6 17.5 17.7 15 11.5 8Amount of rainfall (mm) 160.3 116.4 109.3 82.8 60.6 42.9 22.1 14.2 15.3 46.8 100.5 160Relative humidity (%) 78.4 75.1 72.8 70 68 63.2 57.5 55.1 55.9 63 69.7 77.6Days of Rainfall 15.8 13.1 12.5 12.4 11.6 8.6 4.4 2.4 3.2 5.3 5.4 12.9Average wind speed 3.3 3.7 4.4 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.1Prevailing wind direction NW NW NW NW NE NE NE NE NE NE NW NW
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12 3
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 3/12
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
Extensive tall adobe/stone walls define the boundaries betweenpublic and private spaces (Fig. 5). Gardens have either flat orstepped terraces depending on the topography and usually containpaved areas, a well, auxiliary buildings, an orchard, flowerbeds andeven an arched trellis usually covered with vines (Fig. 6). Theirshape, size and location vary according to the tall walls of theboundaries of each site by which they are defined. There are twodistinct plan layouts identified: one with entrances on the northside, directly from the street, and one with entrances on the southside, through the garden.
E332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
UNCORRECT
4.3. Construction materials and techniques
The building materials used are: adobe (sun dried mud bricks)and mortar of the same material as the adobe units, stone, andtimber. The most common building method in Sernikaki is a mixedmanner of construction, with stone used for the whole groundfloor, or part of it, and adobe used for the floor above (Fig. 7)
The main building material used for constructing the load-bearing walls of the dwellings was adobe, since earth is the mostplentiful resource in the region. Adobe units were made of earth,usually red earth, or whatever kind could be found on site, mixedwith straw along with water, pressed in wooden moulds and driedin the hot sun for a few days until they were ready to be used forconstruction [7]. The adobe walls have a thickness of 0.60–0.70 cmand an average height of 8.00 m. They were built with horizontallyset timber ties of various dimensions (6 cm� 8 cm or10 cm� 12 cm), spaced at 0.70–0.90 cm. These timber ties goaround the buildings, ensuring that the structures are solid andresistant to earthquakes. The creation of these horizontal ties atregular intervals permitted the continuation of construction athigher levels even though the mortar at the lower levels was not yetdried and solidified. Such constructional methods protected againstsudden subsidence and cracking of the walls. The first set of timberties was usually placed above a stone base in order to be protectedfrom humidity and water. Thus, in most cases stone construction(0.60–0.70 cm) forms a base of approximately 0.90 cm in heightabove the ground level on which the bearing adobe walls rest.
The mezzanine floor of the dwellings consists of the ‘‘patera’’(beams that bear the wooden floor) placed right above the timberties in holes 0.30–0.50 cm apart in the walls. They are usually madeof cypress and are of circular cross-section 0.35 cm in diameter and8.00–10.00 m in length. The boards, planks of hard wood werenailed to the beams [7].
The interior partition walls called ‘‘tsatmas,’’ were built up fromthe wooden floor and were very light in construction. They hada width of around 10 cm and consisted of a wooden frame ofnarrow straight laths placed horizontally every 40 cm. The emptyspaces in between were filled with bits of wood, cane, seaweed orshavings. The walls had a top layer of plaster, which covered all theempty spaces, and made them look like ordinary walls despite theirbeing extremely light [7].
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
ROOFThe roofs were most often four pitched: oak, juniper, pine and
cypress; common timber types used for the roof structure. Theload-bearing walls support the roof frame placed above the timberties at this position. The final layer of the roof comprises of woodenboards and clay tiles that are placed on the top boards. The rooftiles, usually of the Byzantine type, were placed on top planks. Theempty space under the roof was never used as a loft, and the roofhad a small slope. The ceiling underneath was constructed withboards, 2 or 3 cm thick. The empty space between the ceiling andthe roof, called ‘‘katarraktis,’’ provided natural ventilation [7].
DP5. Evaluation
5.1. Architectural typology and building physics
Vernacular dwellings of Sernikaki are evaluated in terms ofbuilding physics criteria that pertain to solar geometry, thermalmass, heat transfer, air movement, and solar geometry. Moreover,the evaluation is based on the design variables proposed byMahoney as the ones that promote the creation of buildingsresponsive to the climate. These are: a) the layout of the buildings(orientation in relation to sun and wind, aspect ratio); b) spacing(site planning); c) air movement; d) openings (size–position,protection); and e) building envelope (walls: construction mate-rials-thickness, roof construction detailing) [6].
5.1.1. LayoutOrientation: Dwellings are oriented on a 30� north–east axis.Aspect ratio: The term ‘‘aspect ratio’’ is used to denote the ratio
of the longer dimension of a rectangular plan to the shorter. TheN/W and S/E walls are longer than the N/E and S/W and the ‘‘aspectratio’’ varies from 1.0 to 2.0.
5.1.2. SpacingSite planning: Detached dwellings of compact geometry and
extensive courtyards are designed considering climate conditions(Fig. 8). Gardens provide shady and cool places that become themain living units of the summer months (Fig. 9). The use of gardensalong with their associated landscape features (trees, flowerbeds,vine trellises, soft ground surfaces) and their appropriate placingserves as an additional climate modifier, ensuring human comfortboth indoors and outdoors [8].
5.1.3. Air movementProvision of fresh air: The rooms of the dwellings are provided
with sufficient natural ventilation through the appropriate place-ment of the openings to take advantage of breezes as well asthrough their sizes in relation to the size of the room. The woodenexternal shutters are often used as controlled natural ventilation. Inaddition they are able to control the sunlight. There is also provi-sion for ventilation in the empty space – ‘‘katarraktis’’ – betweenthe ceiling and the roof that adds to the overall cooling [7].
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
UNCORRECTEDPROOF
Tab
le2
Typ
olog
ical
anal
ysis
Typ
esof
dw
elli
ngs
Arc
hit
ectu
ral
typ
olog
yA
rch
itec
tura
lel
emen
ts
Plan
sch
eme
Des
crip
tion
Typ
esof
open
ings
Ia�
On
est
orey
�A
llac
tivi
ties
take
pla
cein
one
room
Ib
�Tw
ost
orie
su
nit
�Th
egr
oun
dfl
oor
isu
sed
asw
orki
ng
pla
ce�
The
firs
tfl
oor
isu
sed
asre
sid
ence
�A
llac
tivi
ties
take
pla
cein
one
room
�A
nex
teri
orw
ood
enor
ston
est
airc
ase
lead
sto
the
firs
tfl
oor
IIa
�Th
ree-
stor
ies
un
it�
The
bas
emen
tan
dth
egr
oun
dfl
oor
are
use
das
wor
kin
gp
lace
�Th
efi
rst
floo
ris
use
das
resi
den
ce�
All
acti
viti
esta
kep
lace
inon
ero
om�
An
exte
rior
woo
den
orst
one
stai
rcas
ele
ads
toth
efi
rst
floo
r
IIb
�Tw
ost
orie
su
nit
�Th
egr
oun
dfl
oor
isu
sed
asw
orki
ng
pla
ce�
The
firs
tfl
oor
isu
sed
asre
sid
ence
.It
isd
ivid
edin
totw
oro
oms:
a‘‘s
ala’
’(li
vin
gro
om)
and
afa
mil
yro
om�
An
exte
rior
woo
den
orst
one
stai
rcas
ele
ads
toth
efi
rst
floo
r
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–124
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 4/12
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architecturaltypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
UNCORRECTEDPROOF
IIc
� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into two room: a ‘‘sala’’ (living room) and
a family room� An exterior wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IIIa1
� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as a working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into two room: a ‘‘sala’’ and a family room� An exterior wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IIIa2
� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into four rooms separated by a corridor.
Bedrooms are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IIIa3
� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into four asymmetrical rooms. Bedrooms
are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
(continued on next page)
V.Anna-M
aria/
Buildingand
Environment
xxx(2008)
1–125
AR
TIC
LE
INP
RE
SS
BAE2127_p
roof�
15Octo
ber
2008�
5/12
Pleasecite
this
articlein
pressas:
An
na-M
ariaV
,Evaluation
ofa
sustainable
Greek
vernacularsettlem
ent
and
itslan
dscape:A
rchitecturaltypology
and
building
physics,Building
and
Environm
ent
(2008),doi:10.1016/j.builden
v.2008.05.026
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
UNCORRECTEDPROOF
Table 2 (continued)
Types ofdwellings
Architectural typology Architectural elements
Plan scheme Description Types of openings
IIIa4
� Three-stories unit� The basement and the ground floor are used as working places� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into three rooms separated by a corridor.
Bedrooms are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IIIb1
� Two stories unit� The ground floor is used as working place� The first floor is used as residence. It is divided into three rooms separated by a corridor.
Bedrooms are private spaces� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IIIb2
� Three-stories unit� The basement is used as working place� The ground floor and the first floor are used as residence. An interior wooden staircase
connects the two floors. Bedrooms are on the ground floor, whereas a ‘‘sala’’ is found onthe first floor� An external wooden or stone staircase leads to the first floor
IV
� Two stories unit� The ground floor and the first floor are used as residence. An interior wooden staircase
connects the two floors. Living rooms are on the ground floor whereas bedrooms are onthe first floor.
V.Anna-M
aria/
Buildingand
Environment
xxx(2008)
1–126
AR
TIC
LE
INP
RE
SS
BAE2127_p
roof�
15Octo
ber
2008�
6/12
Pleasecite
this
articlein
pressas:
An
na-M
ariaV
,Evaluation
ofa
sustainable
Greek
vernacular
settlemen
tan
dits
landscape:
Arch
itecturaltypology
and
building
physics,Building
and
Environmen
t(20
08),doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.20
08.05.026
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
E
OF
Fig. 2. Plan of the settlement.Fig. 4. The human scale of the settlement.
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12 7
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 7/12
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
RRECT
5.1.4. OpeningsSize–position of openings: Openings are placed according to
sun orientation, topography, views, and wind patterns. Their types,proportions and sizes are determined by the orientation of theirwall. Thus, optimum views, natural lighting and cooling breezes areachieved with suitable orientation, design and geometry of theopenings as well as their juxtaposition. There are several S/Eopenings of relatively big size whereas those facing N/W are fewerand of small size. There are a very small number of windows ofsmall size facing south–west and several openings in the north-eastern façades. In addition, their placement on a 30� north–eastaxis, facing the direction of the wind, provides natural ventilationfrom prevailing breezes in summer. The sizes of the openings arerelatively small in relation to room area, and the ratio between theirwidth and length is about 1:2 (Table 2).
Protection of the openings: Protection of the openings fromsolar radiation during summer is also achieved with the use ofmovable shading devices such as wooden external shutters thatpermit the dwelling to be fully shaded during the summer but fullyexposed to solar radiation in winter. Such devices are: blinds andlattices, curtains, vertical shafts, external horizontal shades, andshutters. Since openings are directly related to thermal comfort indwellings that have walls of high thermal inertia, the way they arehandled is of vital importance. Windows are supposed to have their
UNCO
Fig. 3. Dwellings detached with extensive courtyards and sinuous streets (VaryingShape, Width and Position).
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
DPRO
shutters totally closed during the warmest hours of the day, notletting in either the light or the heat from the outside (Fig. 10).Other protecting shading devices used along with the external onesare: blinds, lattices, and curtains found in the interior of thedwellings. It is also interesting to note that the amount of sunlightentering the interior of the house is further reduced by placing thewindow frame inside the window recess (Table 2).
Open spaces, such as balconies (Fig. 11) or ‘‘hagiatia’’ (Fig. 12),are architectural components of bulky volumes under various
Fig. 5. Extensive tall walls defining the boundary between public and private spaces.
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
PROOF
Fig. 6. Various gardens.
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–128
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 8/12
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
forms creating pronounced shade on the sun-warmed facades,changing the current of air, and protecting from rain exposure. Theyare usually south and east oriented, providing a thermal refuge anda place of transition from inwards to outwards. The principledifference between balcony and ‘‘hagiati’’ is their respective size,the latter being larger than the former (2.00–3.00 m wide toprovide for outdoor functions). Moreover, the ‘‘hagiati’’ is covered
UNCORRECTED
Fig. 7. Sernikaki’s mixed manner of construction-stone ground floor and adobe forfloors above.
Fig. 8. Detached dwelling of compact geometry and extensive courtyard.
Fig. 9. Vine trellis close to the dwelling providing shade during the summer.
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architecturaltypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
TEDPROOF
Fig. 10. Openings having their shutters closed during the warmest hours of the day.
Fig. 11. Various balconies.
Fig. 12. Various ‘‘Hagiatia’’.
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12 9
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 9/12
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
UNCORRECby a roof that is angled away from the main roof to best reduce solar
admittance.
5.1.5. Building envelopeWalls: Thick walls made of adobe form the most common
external walls. The wall section has a thickness of 0.60–0.70 cm anda low U-value (U¼ 1.02); hence it serves as a good insulator [9]. Thetime lag of these walls is high; they store heat during the daytimeand radiate it into the room at night when the outside temperatureis below the comfort range [10,11]. The light colored surfaces of thefaçades are used as a mechanism for the protection of the highthermal mass walls against solar radiation as they absorb less heatin summer, thus preventing the rise of internal temperatures.
Roofs: Consistent with the use of high thermal capacity verticalenvelopes, dwellings use roof construction materials and detailingthat possess medium thermal capacities (K¼ 1.5) [12].
Table 3 evaluates all types of dwellings by their layout, spacing,air movement, openings, and building envelope (Table 3). Dwell-ings are oriented on a 30� north–east axis; and, in most cases, theirN/W & S/E walls are slightly longer than the N/E & S/W. It can beassumed that such an orientation is preferred to the east–west axissuggested by the Mahoney Tables as the most suitable to providemaximum environmental comfort that work with the elements ofsunshine, light, air, and indoor temperatures. All types of dwellingsuse compact geometry as much as possible, which providesmaximum volume with minimum area exposed to the sun. Thepreference for compact built forms, along with the use of envelopematerials with high thermal capacities, aligns with the recom-mendations in the Mahoney Tables to maximize heat storage.Moreover, they are organized so that they are detached withextensive courtyards rather than attached as suggested in the
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
Mahoney Tables. The extensive tall garden walls that define theboundaries between public and private spaces seem to function ascontinuous windbreaks, especially during winter. The MahoneyTables suggest rooms double-banked with temporary means forwind passage. Contrary to this suggestion, the floor plan ofthe dwellings representative of the older vernacular types is
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
UNCORRECTEDPROOF
Table 3Evaluation of the architectural typology and building physics
Types of residence Layout Spacing Air movement Openings Building envelope
Orientation
Aspect ratio Site planning Plan layout Size–Position Protection Walls Roofs
Ia 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 12.5%, NW: –, SW: 10.5%,NE: 9.5%
External woodenshutters
Adobe–stonewalls of high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
Ib 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 13.0%, NW: –, SW: –,NE: 11%
External wooden shuttersHagiati at the E. side
Adobe–stonewalls of high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIa 1.40DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 10.5%, NW: 8.0%, SW: –,NE: 7.5%
External woodenshutters
Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIb 1.60DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 19.0%, NW: –, SW: –,NE: 11.0%
External wooden shuttersBalcony at the S. side
Adobe–stonewalls of high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIc 1.00DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 15.0%, NW: 6.7%, SW: –,NE: 7.5%
External wooden shuttersHagiati at the S.E. side
Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIIa1 1.60DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Single-bankedSE: 11.7%, NW: 1.17%, SW: –,NE: 7.15%
External wooden shuttersBalcony at the E. side
Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIIa2 1.30DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Double-bankedAxial corridor
SE: 22%, NW: 9.0%, SW: –,NE: 4.4%
External wooden shuttersBalcony at the N. sideHagiati at the S. side
Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
IIIa3 1.30DetachedExtensivecourtyard
Double-bankedAxial corridor
SE: 19.8%, NW: 8.7%, SW: –,NE: 13.9%
Balconies at bothS. & E. sides
Adobe–stone wallsof high thermal mass
Roofs of mediumthermal mass
V.Anna-M
aria/
Buildingand
Environment
xxx(2008)
1–1210
AR
TIC
LE
INP
RE
SS
BAE2127_p
roof�
15Octo
ber
2008�
10/12
Pleasecite
this
articlein
pressas:
An
na-M
ariaV
,Evaluation
ofa
sustainable
Greek
vernacular
settlemen
tan
dits
landscape:
Arch
itecturaltypology
and
building
physics,Building
and
Environmen
t(20
08),doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.20
08.05.026
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
UNCORRECTE
3
IIIa
41.
30
Det
ach
edEx
ten
sive
cou
rtya
rd
Dou
ble
-ban
ked
Axi
alco
rrid
orSE
:2
3.0
%,
NW
:12
.0%
,SW
:10
.8%
,NE:
6.0
%B
alco
nie
sat
bot
hS.
&N
.sid
esA
dob
e–st
one
wal
lsof
hig
hth
erm
alm
ass
Roo
fsof
med
ium
ther
mal
mas
s
IIIb
11.
80
Det
ach
edEx
ten
sive
cou
rtya
rdSi
ngl
e-b
anke
dSE
:11
.9%
,N
W:
5.3
%,S
W:
–,N
E:10
.68
%
Bal
con
ies
atb
oth
S.&
N.s
ides
Hag
iati
atth
eE.
sid
e
Ad
obe–
ston
ew
alls
ofh
igh
ther
mal
mas
sR
oofs
ofm
ediu
mth
erm
alm
ass
IIIb
22
.00
Det
ach
edEx
ten
sive
cou
rtya
rdSi
ngl
e-b
anke
dSE
:12
.8%
,NW
:3
.56
%,S
W:
2.5
7%
,N
E:7.
7%
Bal
con
yat
the
S.si
de
Hag
iati
atth
eS.
sid
e
Ad
obe–
ston
ew
alls
ofh
igh
ther
mal
mas
sR
oofs
ofm
ediu
mth
erm
alm
ass
IV1.
30
Det
ach
edEx
ten
sive
cou
rtya
rd
Dou
ble
-ban
ked
Axi
alco
rrid
orSE
:2
3.8
%,N
W:
7.4
%,S
W:
8.3
%,
NE:
18.8
%B
alco
nie
sat
the
N.S
.&E.
sid
esA
dob
e–st
one
wal
lsof
hig
hth
erm
alm
ass
Roo
fsof
med
ium
ther
mal
mas
s
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–12 11
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 11/12
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
F
single-banked (one room wide) whereas the floor plan of thedwellings representative of neoclassical architecture adapted to thevernacular architectural idiom of QSernikakaki (types: IIa2, IIa3, IIa4,and IV) is double-banked (two rooms wide) with an axial corridorfor wind passage. The openings in the vertical envelope aremodestly sized, equaling between 10–20% of the vertical surfacearea, a lower percentage than the one suggested in the MahoneyTables. The need for openings in the vertical envelope is based onproviding contact with the outside, admitting light, and permittingventilation of the building interior. Thus, several S/E and N/Eopenings have been chosen to provide the best exploitation ofwinter solar radiation whereas N/W and S/W openings are fewerand of small size. In addition, architectural components such asbalconies, ‘‘hagiatia,’’ and external wooden shutters are employedto reduce solar admittance, a design guideline also suggested in theMahoney Tables.
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
DPROO
5.2. Sernikaki: a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement
The fact that Sernikaki has maintained its qualities for morethan a hundred years suggests that the techniques of itsconstruction and the building materials employed were wellthought professional choices aiming at sustainability. Moreover,traditional builders did not only aim at achieving comfort withoutthe need of any mechanical systems, but were also concerned aboutenergy, material costs, as well as the impact of the buildings on theenvironment. This becomes obvious by their use of recyclablematerials.
Therefore, the vernacular architecture of Sernikaki can bedefined as sustainable. The criteria that lead to the creation of sucha sustainable vernacular settlement are: 1) holistic consideration ofnegative environmental impacts that arise in the construction ofbuildings and their infrastructures; 2) design recommendations,which minimize the adverse environmental effects in building; 3)use of materials with low maintenance and energy efficiency; 4)selection of building materials that provide thermal comfort; 5) useof renewable and natural resources; 6) reduction of energyconsumption by maximizing passive thermal comfort; 7) concernfor integral quality: economic, social and environmental perfor-mance; 8) improvement of environmental quality; and 9) provisionfor comfortable living spaces [13].
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
6. Present-day condition of Sernikaki
Today, Sernikaki is relatively untouched. However, additions tothe traditional dwellings or new constructions added to thevernacular core are being built with little consideration of theclimate since they depend heavily on mechanical systems to providethermal comfort. Specific guidelines, codes, regulations and legis-lations for restoring and preserving such an important vernacularsettlement have not been precisely set. Government regulations aremainly concerned with the preservation of the outer shell of build-ings, and therefore direct the owners to preserve only architecturalfacades at the expense of many other important qualities of thebuildings such as the ones discussed in this paper. Additions andrestorations are made with no concrete guidelines and usually occurwhen the dwellings fall into disuse and decay. This tendencythreatens to change the entire character of the settlement unlesscurrent architectural practices incorporate the above exploredguidelines that provide recommendations on the orientation andlayout of buildings, the size and position of the openings, and thecharacteristics of walls and roofs. Such an embedded understandingof vernacular architecture may serve as a model for sustainabledesign in response to climate, energy use and notions of environ-mental quality [14].
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
E4
V. Anna-Maria / Building and Environment xxx (2008) 1–1212
ARTICLE IN PRESS BAE2127_proof � 15 October 2008 � 12/12
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
7. Conclusions
Sernikaki is a vernacular Greek settlement that takes advantageof its climate through the appropriate application of designelements and building technology for energy preservation as wellfor ensuring comfortable dwelling conditions. This paper wasconcerned with the layout of the buildings (orientation in relationto sun and wind, aspect ratio), the spacing (site planning), the airmovement, the openings (size–position, protection), and thebuilding envelope (walls: construction materials-thickness, roofconstruction detailing). It evaluated specific vernacular dwellingtypes and their response to climate, based on design principles thatcould be adapted to current architectural practice in the area, inorder to optimize, the relationship between site, building andclimate.
This paper attempts to reveal the secrets applied in suchdurable, compatible, elegant, reliable and eco-efficient buildings inSernikaki. It can be presumed that these vernacular characteristicsgenerate climatic benefits since people who had lived in them buthave recently moved into new buildings complain that the newbuildings are not as comfortable as the traditional ones. Therefore,they can form design recommendations that could be incorporatedinto current architectural practices in the area.
The dwellings of Sernikaki demonstrate an economical use oflocal building resources, and respond to climatic conditions usinglow-energy design principles that provide human comfort. Thesedesign principles are consistent with the form, orientation andmateriality of the buildings. Their combination of engineering andarchitecture reveals an aesthetic quality which, instead of imposingon the environment it emanates from it. The study of thesedwellings, on the one hand helps to better understand theirdevelopment, and on the other, provides examples of a sustainablebuilding tradition, from which many lessons can be learned.
UNCORRECT
Please cite this article in press as: Anna-Maria V, Evaluation of a sustaitypology and building physics, Building and Environment (2008), doi:10
Associating bioclimatic design with vernacular typology mayindicate design recommendations, which can be replicated not onlyas a gesture of respect towards tradition but also for its essentialvalue of providing the region with buildings which by beingclimatically responsive are also energy efficient.
DPROOF
References
[1] Coch H. Bioclimatism in vernacular architecture. Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews 1996;2(1–2):67–87.
[2] Balaras C, Gaglia A, Georgopoulou E, Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Lalas D. Euro-pean residential building and empirical assessment of the Hellenic buildingstock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings. Buildingand Environment 2007;42:1298–314.
[3] Kolokotroni M, Young AN. Guidelines for bioclimatic housing design in Greece.Building and Environment 1990;25(4):297–307.
[4] Szokolay S. Introduction to architectural science: the basis of sustainabledesign. London: Elsevier Ltd.; 2004.
[5] EMY. Climatic records of Greece: Department of Meteorology.[6] Heerwagen D. Passive and active environmental controls: informing the
schematic designing of buildings. McGraw-Hill; 2004.[7] Kouremenos K. In: Philippides D, editor. Phokida, in Greek traditional archi-
tecture. Greece: Melissa Publishing House; 1989. Q[8] Brown RGillespie T. Microclimatic landscape design: creating thermal comfort
and energy efficiency. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1995.[9] Oikonomou A. Summer thermal comfort in traditional buildings of the 19th
century in Florina, north-western Greece. In: International conference‘‘Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment’’; 2005. p. 239–44.
[10] Parra-Saldivar ML, Batty W. Thermal behavior of adobe constructions. Buildingand Environment 2006;41:1892–904.
[11] Eben Saleh MA. Adobe as a thermal regulating material. Solar &Wind Tech-nology 1990;7(4):407–16.
[12] Evangelinos E, Zacharopoulos E. Thermal value of the building shell in tradi-tional buildings. Design and Art in Greece 1989;20:52–3.
[13] Godfaurd J, Clements-Croome D, Jeronimidis G. Sustainable building solutions:a review of lessons from the natural world. Building and Environment2005;40(3):319–28.
[14] Asquith l, Vellinga M. Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century:theory, education and practice. London & New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
nable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026
Top Related