In Salah 1904 - Tamanrasset 1905 : Les deux soumissions des Touaregs
Entente Cordiale 1904 (Exposè)
Transcript of Entente Cordiale 1904 (Exposè)
Enten te Cord ia l e , 1902 -‐1905 Class: MA 1 Prepared by: Hadhami Walhazi Date: 26 Feb 2015 Module : GB Studies
OUTLINE
I. Introduction II. The Entente Cordiale
1. Definition 2. The Run Up To The Entente 3. What Makes The Entente Resonates? 4. Critique 5. Entente In Caricature
III. Conclusion IV. Bibliography
Introduction
è Basing on the Otte’s metaphor, it seems that the entente cordiale is considered as a colorful representation of the gloomy past.
è Thus, it is quite crucial to understand the process throughout a historiographical approach.
è So let’s see together how the Anglo-‐French relations shifted from an ambiguous and complicated status in Pax Britannica to a ‘honeymoon’ thanks to Entente Cordiale.
1 Source: Article entitled: FROM ‘’WAR IN SIGHT’ TO NEARLY WAR ANGLO FRENSH RELATIONS IN THE AGE OF HIGH IMPERIALISM,1875-‐1898 ,written by T.G Otte, published in 2006.
‘ The entente cordiale was very much a case of painting the recent past in colours that suited present tastes and needs ’1
Definitions v Literal meaning:
è ‘entente cordiale’ is a French term which literally means ‘warm understanding’ v What is the Entente Cordiale?
è The Entente Cordiale, which meant to be as "cordial agreement", was a group of agreements made between the two European countries, France and Great Britain.
è Both France and Great Britain representatives signed the agreements, which they came to by solving their disputes and compromising with each other.2
Ø Primary source of the front page of the Parisian newspaper, Le Petit
Journal, written on August 20, 1905 after the Entente Cordiale was made in 1904.3
2 Source: (Events Leading to World War 1, Historyannex.com; Entente Cordiale (European History), Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 3 Sources: www.irishhistoricaltextiles.com + http://colonizationofmorocco.weebly.com/entente-‐cordiale.html
v Protagonists: France + Britain
v Date: 9 April 1904
v Formal (official) Title: The Declaration between UK and France Respecting Egypt and morocco, together with the secret Articles signed at the same time.
v Goals:
è Quoting from a comment written in the Pall Mall Magazine in 1904:
‘ The entente cordiale is a reality established and perpetuated by the Anglo-French treaty long before so happy a consummation, there were influences at work to change the misunderstandings and misrepresentations between the two peoples into something akin to good feeling.’
è The Entente Cordiale was beneficial for both nations because it gave them freedom to pursue their own interests in colonizing other countries. France was able to act on their interests in Morocco without interference from the British. Also, Britain was allowed to continue their actions in Egypt and the French couldn’t do anything to stop their activity4
v Historical Importance/value: è It was considered the cradle 5 of cooperation between the two nations in internal
affairs. è Entente relations were seen as a milestone in the structure of the anti-‐German
bloc.
v Franco-British Declaration, 1904: Articles and comments on them
Article 1 His Britannic Majesty's Government declare that they have no intention of altering the political status of Egypt. The Government of the French Republic, for their part, declare that
In the first article of the Entente Cordiale agreement between the British and France, the British government promises that they will not change the political status or government of Egypt. In return, the French government will not interfere
4 Source: (Events Leading to World War 1, Historyannex.com; Entente Cordiale (European History), Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 5 cradle(n) = infant’s bed
they will not obstruct the action of Great Britain in that country. It is agreed that the post of Director-General of Antiquities in Egypt shall continue, as in the past, to be entrusted to a French savant. The French schools in Egypt shall continue to enjoy the same liberty as in the past. Article 2 The Government of the French Republic declare that they have no intention of altering the political status of Morocco. His Britannic Majesty's Government, for their part, recognise that it appertains to France, more particularly as a Power whose dominions are conterminous for a great distance with those of Morocco, to preserve order in that country, and to provide assistance for the purpose of all administrative, economic, financial, and military reforms which it may require. They declare that they will not obstruct the action taken by France for this purpose, provided that such action shall leave intact the rights which Great Britain, in virtue of treaties, conventions, and usage, enjoys in Morocco, including the right of coasting trade between the ports of Morocco, enjoyed by British vessels since 1901.
Article 8 The two Governments, inspired by
with Britain's activity in Egypt. Even though Britain is able to colonize Egypt, both countries agree that some of France's activity in Egypt in the past will remain the same. For example, France is still able to run its schools in Egypt with the same freedom as they had before. The second article of the Franco-British Declaration talks about France and Great Britain's agreement on Morocco. The French government is allowed to colonize Morocco if they don't mess with Morocco's political status. The British government says that they will not restrict France's actions in Morocco as long as the French activity doesn't prevent Great Britain's rights with Morocco. Great Britain must be allowed to continue its trading with Morocco.
their feeling of sincere friendship for Spain, take into special consideration the interests which that country derives from her geographical position and from her territorial possessions on the Moorish coast of the Mediterranean. In regard to these interests the French Government will come to an understanding with the Spanish Government. The agreement which may be come to on the subject between France and Spain shall be communicated to His Britannic Majesty's Government. (Primary Documents- Entente Cordiale 8 April 1904, First WorldWar.com)
Article 8 of the Franco-British Declaration brings Spain into the agreement because both France and Great Britain have friendships with Spain. This article talks about how both nations also want to think about what Spain's interest are. The declaration describes Spain's interests as being based off of their location, because Spain is close to North Africa, and the territory that they already have. For those reasons, France says that they will make an agreement with Spain because both countries have shown interest in Morocco. Also, when the agreement is made, Britain needs to be informed about it.
v Remarks: è Entente Cordiale consisted three crucial records. The leading document was
about the proclamation of the futures of both Egypt and Morocco. è Through this informal agreement, France acknowledged British dominance over
Egypt while Britain recognized France in Morocco. è In addition, the Entente Cordiale recognized the right of free passage through the
Suez Canal. Moreover, Convention of Constantinople was brought into force. è When second document is examined, it was relevant to Newfoundland, west and
central Africa. It was marked that France gave up special fishery rights on the Newfoundland coastline and in return, France collected reparation and territory in Senegal and Nigeria.
è A final declaration was about Siam. The British accepted French effect on the eastern part of the Menam river basin in return, French acknowledged British dominance over the area to the west of the Menam basin.
è It is important to highlight that British isolation and constant feelings of supremacy6 was reduced by the Entente Cordiale.
6 Speaking to the BBC in 1994 Hurd reminisced that “When I was a young diplomat I was really rather terrified of the French […] There lingered for a long time a feeling that it was not quite safe to have a discussion with a Frenchman, not because he would deceive you but because he was actually cleverer” (Sir Charles Powell, “Entente Cordiale”, broadcast by the BBC, 8 September 1994)
The run up to the Entente 1843: Guizot7 uses the expression Entente Cordiale for the first time, officially, in September 1843. Then it enters the British political lexicon. 1853: The Crimean War 8in which England’s entrance into it, aggravated the tensions with France. 1854:
-‐ a cloudy atmosphere of fear and xenophobic attitudes towards Britain. -‐ The Politian John Crocker, when feared-‐as many other French politians-‐ a war
with France, suggested to resuscitate the entente through commerce. 1860: -‐Two great traders: Richard Cobden and Michel Chevalier brought their free trade agreement which attempted to calm down the tensions by establishing Britain and France as trading partners. -‐Though the commercial agreement was fiercely opposed by English invasionists and French protectionists, it successfully stirred up commerce and succeed to smoothen the atmosphere. 1871: -‐The civil war broke out in Paris, France. -‐It ended with la Semaine sanglante (= bloody week) in which 20.000 French citizen were shot. -‐It engendered shock and horror in Britain and jarred the fragile entente.
è Collapse of the commercial agreements. 1886: The expression ‘entente’ was brought to the floor by an English company which aimed for an Franco-‐English ‘rapprochement’. Similar company appeared in France, one year after, aiming for the development of more cordial relations between the two nations. 1989: ‘The Fashoda incident demonstrated, in time, to many French politicians that there was no hope of ending the resented British occupation of Egypt and the Nile valley. Confrontation with Britain in Africa was clearly futile, and accommodation potentially advantageous.’9 1903: Reciprocal visits: Eduard à Paris , Loubetà London
7 Guizot is the Minister of Foreign French Affairs 8 Crimean War is a war (1853–56) between Russia and an alliance of Great Britain, France, Sardinia, and Turkey. Russian aggression against Turkey led to war, with Turkey's European allies intervening to destroy Russian naval power in the Black Sea in 1854; eventually the allies captured the fortress city of Sebastopol in 1855 after a lengthy siege. 9 James K. Hiller, "The 1904 Anglo-‐French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look", Acadiensis, pp. 82-‐98
‘Offended memories about Fashoda Crisis had poisoned Anglo-‐French relations but this icy atmosphere of hostility replaced with hot climate by reciprocal state visits in 1903’10 1904: Signing the Entente agreements.
-‐ Paris visit of Edward VII as a British king, and French President’s visit to London were resulted in signing an informal alliance in April 1904 which is known as the Entente Cordiale.11
-‐ This symbolizes the beginning of Anglo-‐French friendship, and solved long-‐standing colonial conflicts in North Africa.
1905: -‐ Germany tried to use the question of Morocco’s independence to create disharmony between Britain and France as well as encourage German commercial considerations in Morocco. -‐ Kaiser Wilhelm II’s visit to Tangier on 31 March 1905 led to alarm France and stir international crisis. -‐ Expectedly, first Moroccan crisis made German relations bitter with Britain and France. -‐ In 1906, international crisis was solved in favor of France at the Algeciras Conference. At the end of the conference, Morocco would have controlled by France. Most fundamentally, cooperation between Britain and France was reaffirmed.12
10 from: ‘British Foreign & Strategic Policy: Entente Cordiale’ By ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE ,pub on November 25, 2013 11 Harold Nicolson, ‘‘The Origins and Development of the Anglo-‐French Entente,’’ International Affairs ,p29-‐30 (1954) 12 Nicolson, ’The Origins and Development of the Anglo-‐French Entente,’’ p412.
What makes the Entente resonates?
In an article, it is said: the entente ‘neither abolished all argument between the two nations nor inaugurated an era of perpetual cross-Channel harmony. ’
è As it is expressed in The Guardian and shared by other press and politicians, it was a common belief that the Entente between Britain and France is build upon fake relationship. To add its diplomatic aims were not achieved.
Yet, there is a constant call for reviving and resigning it. So what makes French and British governments interested in rebuilding ties between each other through reviving the entente of 1904?
è The answer could be as mentioned in The Best of Rivals , an article published in The Guardian:
It is partly because the entente defined relations between the two nations in the context of the wider world - a very modern concept. Yet mostly because the Entente embodied two principles that are essential to 21st-century Europe.
The first - for which the Entente was much criticised then and since by nationalists in both countries - is that the treaty was a lasting victory for the principle that disputes between states are better settled by diplomacy than by war. Britain and France had fought bloody conflicts against each other for centuries before 1904.
The second lesson, which is less well understood here than it should be, is that Britain and France are nations with shared problems, interests and values. The problems that face modern France are very close to the problems that face modern Britain. The countries occupy comparable places in the global order. Our peoples have a common inheritance of ideas and culture. We mislead ourselves if we think that modern Britain has more to learn from America than from France. A British official, quoted in our coverage, says Britain and France are "condemned to work together". We put it more positively. Vive l'entente cordiale!
Critiques
Let’s see how the French press saw the Entente
To begin with, the Franco-‐British ‘declaration’, as LE MONDE expressed, was the product of toughly negotiated diplomatic reconciliation. De facto, ‘it contains no flowery proclamations of eternal friendship’. French papers asked why the countries had signed the 1904 entente in the 1st place. It enables the British royal family ‘to forget their German roots’ It was a means of ending both countries ‘diplomatic isolation’. Above all, the entente was ‘an agreement on how to share the world’s colonies’, suggested LES ECHOS, ‘the countries are a long way from having a shared vision of the world.’ LE PARISIEN's Anne-‐Sophie Damecour mingled with the cheering crowds on the Champs-‐Elysées and thought the entente was "more than cordial". But for Christophe Forcari in LIBÉRATION, Anglophobia is as much part "of the national folklore as the baguette". The paper's website invited readers to list the best and worst things about England. Baked beans, ginger biscuits, beer and post offices were among the surprising favourites. The royal family, tabloids, nightclubs and football fans all met with a disdainful Gallic shrug. Other news papers believe that the historical essence of the Entente cordiale was a colonial carve up rather than a warm understanding between Britain and France.
Entente Cordiale in Caricature The cartoonist Jean Veber drew a caricature entitled ‘Perfidious Albion’. It was published on 18th September 1901 in L’Assiette au Beurre . This cartoon has drawn the attention of many readers, politicians and historians. It has already been spotted by many different studies, all-‐insisting on the anti-‐British feeling: Anglophobia.
Let’s describe it rapidly: Albion is depicted as an quite old woman, bearing Albion’s helmet bowing and laughing, seen from behind. Her skirts are lifted; displaying her backside, on the reader can identify the features of king Eduard. According to the French ambassador Paul Cambon, ‘it is shocking but very well made’.
Focusing on the title of this caricature, one could say that it is quite important as it refers to the long-‐term habit of British diplomacy as ‘Perfidious Albion‘. It continues the story of Anglo-‐ French rivalry by responding to pejorative British cartoons. It adds something more by attacking the making of Victorian society, underlining the opposition between the moral values and the atrocities of the bloody wars. The French government, after signing the entente cordiale, sought to ban this the caricature that could damage bilateral relations. In theory, the Republic had to respect the liberty of press. It could not impose censorship. Yet, the police was ordered to burn all publication. The cartoonist was obliged to made new versions in which he covers or modify the face of the king. The French authorities were very careful not to hurt the British diplomacy. After 1904, they intensify the fight against the reprinting of the cartoon. But they also encourage a new historical use: against Germany; Albion was replaced by Germania and Eduard By Wilhem.
That is to say, new caricature replaced the original one. Thus, the new postcard reflected the evolution of the political relations between Britain and France13. Indeed, the building
13 this idea is further explained in ‘The Centre for the Study of Cartoons and Caricature, University of Kent’ , http://library.ukc.ac.uk/cartoons.
of the Entente in 1904 changed the representation of foreign policies in France, and identified the main enemy to fear: Germany. Perfidious Albion is used to evoke tensions between Britain and France, and between the latter and Germany in a sharp sense of humor. It is the modal of the political caricature that depicts the international complications and justifies for evolution of the Anglo-‐French relations before and after the Entente. In this context the caricature took a further dimensions. Though it was mainly created for commercial use, it becomes a pressure on diplomacy, a tool of war propaganda, an instrument of reconciliation and an identifier of the real enemy.
Conclusion
It marked a growing friendship, which is a hopeful sign in international politics. But it is deceitful to pretend that it had roots in popular sentiments in both countries. After all, France and Britain are rivals, thus the idea of friendship is curiously antagonistic to the Imperial spirit. Therefore, the entente is rather the product of popular weariness and disillusionment with a fashionable political creed.14 It was considered as an urgent need for the furtherance of a common democratic cause.
14 From the archive, 9 April 1904: The growth of the "entente cordiale" Originally published in the Manchester Guardian on 9 April 1904
Bibliography
i. Used Books and E-books
Antoine Capet, Historical Use Of Caricature: The Destiny Of The Perfidious Albion (2009) Antoine Capet, Introduction: ‘Britain’s Most Enduring Special Relationship’, (2006) p 1-7 from the book: Britain, France and the Entente Cordiale since 1904 Christopher Andrew, Théophile Delcassé and the Making of the Entente Cordiale: A Reappraisal of French Foreign Policy 1989-1905, (St. Martin’s Press, 1968), p206.
Harold Nicolson, The Origins and Development of the Anglo-French Entente,’’ International Affairs , (1954),p29-30,p411-420 James K. Hiller, The 1904 Anglo-French Newfoundland Fisheries Convention: Another Look, Acadiensis, XXV, 1 (1995), p. 82-98.
Richard Davis, « The Anglo-French Relationship as seen through British Political Cartoons, from the Third to the Fifth Republic », Revue LISA/LISA e-journal [En ligne], Vol. I - n°1 | 2003, online save: 27/08/2009, consulted 18/02/2015.
Syln Stone,Thomas G. Otte , Anglo-French relations since the late Eighteenth century
Thomas G. Otte,War In Sight To Nearly War: Anglo French Relations In The Age Of High Imperialism,1875-1898 , (2006) p 693-714
i. Used Websites
http://colonizationofmorocco.weebly.com/entente-cordiale.html http://en.akademikperspektif.com/2013/11/25/british-foreign-strategic-policy-entente-cordiale/ http://library.ukc.ac.uk/cartoon http://lisa.revues.org/3118 http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/188822/Entente-Cordiale http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/71095/andre-geraud-pertinax/rise-and-fall-of-the-anglo-french-entente http://www.heritage.nf.ca/exploration/entente.html http://www.kent.ac.uk/courses/modulecatalogue/modules/HI6034