EMR: India: Shongtong-Karchham Hydroelectric Project (450 ...

272
The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Management Plan Report Project Number: 41627-05 June 2011 IND: Himachal Pradesh Clean Energy Development Investment Program – Tranche 4 Prepared by WAPCOS Limited for Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.

Transcript of EMR: India: Shongtong-Karchham Hydroelectric Project (450 ...

The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website.

Environmental Assessment Report

Environmental Management Plan Report Project Number: 41627-05 June 2011

IND: Himachal Pradesh Clean Energy Development Investment Program – Tranche 4

Prepared by WAPCOS Limited for Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER-1 COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN 1.1 Introduction 1-1

1.2 Acquisition of Forest Land 1-1

1.3 Anti-Poaching Measures 1-5

1.4 Biodiversity Conservation Plan 1-5

1.5 Budget 1-6

CHAPTER-2 CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN 2.1 General 2-1

2.2 Project Details 2-1

2.3 Need for Catchment Area Treatment 2-4

2.4 Silt Yield Index (SYI) Method 2-4

2 5 Estimation of Soil Loss Using Silt Yield Index (SYI) Method 2-6

2.6 Water Shed Management – Available Techniques 2-7

2.7 Catchment Area Treatment Measures 2-9

2.8 Treatment Measures 2-9

2.9 Joint Forest Management 2-11

2 10 Wild Life Management 2–14

2.11 Silt Observatories 2–18

2.12 Basin Level CAT Plan 2–18

2.13 Training of Forest Staff 2–18

2.14 Provision of Energy Saving Devices 2–18

2.15 Forest Protection Measures 2–18

2.16 Community Development 2- 20

2.17 Forestry Research 2- 20

2.18 Research Work on Snow Leopard 2- 20

2.19 Conservation Plan for Neoza Pine 2- 20

2.20 Conservation Plan for Oak 2-20

2.21 Rescue Centre for Wildlife 2- 21

2.22 Snow Harvesting 2- 21

2,23 Infrastructure Required for Monitoring of Cat Plan 2- 21

2.24 Eco-Tourism 2- 21

2.25 Monitoring and Evaluation 2- 21

2.26 Eco-Services to Local Communities 2- 21

2.27 Cost Estimate for Engineering and Biological Treatment Measures, Joint Forest Management (JFM) and Silt Observatories

2- 21

2.28 Other Issues 2-25

CHAPTER-3 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1 Introduction 3-1

3.2 Strategy for Fisheries Development 3-2

3.3 Infrastructure proposed for Development of Fisheries in Kinnaur Valley Streams

3-3

3.4 Seed Stocking goals from Sangla Trout Farm 3-5

3.5 Duration 3-5

3.4 Construction Agency 3-5

3.5 Appraisal and monitoring 3-5

CHAPTER-4 PUBLIC HEALTH DELIVERY SYSTEM 4.1 Introduction 4-1

4.2 Impacts on Public Health 4-1

4.3 Public Health Delivery System 4-1

4.4 Budget 4-5

4.5 Disposal of Bio-Medical Waste 4-5

CHAPTER-5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN LABOUR CAMPS 5.1 Introduction 5-1

5.2 Provision of Heating 5-1

5.3 Provision of Water Supply 5-1

5.4 Sanitation & Sewage Treatment Facilities 5-1

5.5 Solid Waste Management from Labour Camps 5-2

5.6 Provision of Free Fuel 5-3

5.7 Construction of Police Post 5-5

5.8 Budget 5-5

5.9 Implementing Agency 5-5

CHAPTER-6 MUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.1 Introduction 6-1

6.2 Muck Generation 6-1

6.3 Budget 6-5

CHAPTER-7 RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPING OF CONSTRUCTION SITES 7.1 Introduction 7-1

7.2 Restoration Plan for Quarry Site and Borrow Area 7-1

7.3 Landscaping and Restoration Plan 7-3

7.4 Budget 7-3

CHAPTER-8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION 8.1 Introduction 8-1

8.2 Impacts due to Construction of Roads 8-1

8.3 Management Measures 8-2

8.4 Budget 8-3

CHAPTER-9 GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9.1 Introduction 9-1

9.2 Need for Greenbelt Development Plan 9-1

9.3 Scheme for Greenbelt Development 9-1

9.4 Budget 9-2

CHAPTER-10 CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

10.1 Impacts on Air Quality 10-1

10.2 Mitigation Measures 10-2

10.3 Budget 10-4

10.4 Implementing Agency 10-4

CHAPTER-11 MEASURES FOR NOISE CONTROL

11.1 Impacts on Noise Levels 11-1

11.2 Mitigation Measures 11-1

11.3 Budget 11-3

11.4 Implementing Agency 11-3

CHAPTER-12 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

12.1 Control of Water Pollution During Construction Phase 12-1

12.2 Control of Water Pollution During Operation Phase 12-1

12.3 Treatment of Solid Waste from Project Colony 12-1

CHAPTER-13 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN

13.1 Introduction 13-1

13.2 Affected Properties, Land and Families 13-1

13.3 Payment of compensation 13-2

13.4 Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan 13-2

13.5 Institutional/ Administrative Arrangement for Implementation of the R&R Measures

13-5

13.6 Participation of PAFs 13-7

13.7 Activities Undertaken Under R&R Plan During 2009-2010 13-8

13.8 Budget for Resettlement & Rehabilitation 13-10

CHAPTER-14 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

14.1 The Need 14-1

14.2 Areas of Concern 14-1

14.3 Water Quality 14-1

14.4 Air Quality and Meteorology 14-2

14.5 Noise 14-2

14.6 Soil Erosion and Siltation 14-2

14.7 Ecology 14-2

14.8 Incidence of Water-Related Diseases 14-3

14.9 Land use Pattern 14-3

14.10 Muck Disposal Sites 14-3

14.11 Summary of Environmental Monitoring programme 14-3

14.12 Implementing Agency 14-9

CHAPTER-15 COST ESTIMATES

15.1 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan 15-1

15.2 Cost for Implementing Environmental Monitoring Programme 15-1

CHAPTER-16 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES

CHAPTER 17 PROJECT BENEFITS

17.1 Need for the Project 17-1

17.2 Project features 17-2

17.3 Project benefits 17-5

CHAPTER-18 PUBLIC HEARING, CONSULTATION AND DEMANDS

18.1 Public Consultation 18-1

18.2 Minutes of Public Hearing 18-1

CHAPTER-19 Grievance Redressal Mechanisms

19.1 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 19-1

19.2 Grievance Redressal Hierarchy under LADA as on 2011 19-2

19.3 No Objection Certificate “NOC” 19-3

19.4 Activities proposed under project 19-3

19.5 LADA development budget estimate (PROPOSED) 19-4

CHAPTER 20 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS INVOLVED IN THE CEIA STUDY

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AISLUS - All India Soil and Land Use Survey CAT - Catchment Area Treatment CPCB - Central Pollution Control Board DEM - Digital Elevation Model DTM - Digital Terrain Model DPR - Detailed Project Report EC - Electrical conductivity EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan GIS - Geological Information System GHNP - Great Himalayan National Park GOI - Government of India HEP - Hydroelectric Project HPSEB - Himanchal Pradesh State Electricity Board MOEF - Ministry of Environment and Forests M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation NEERI - National Environmental Research Institute NOC - No Objection Certificate NOx - Nitrogen Oxides NPRR - National Policy for Resettlement & Rehabilitation NPV - Net Productivity value PAP - Project Affected People PAF - Project Affected Families PHC - Primary Health Centre R&R - Resettlement & Rehabilitation RPM - Respirable Particulate Matter SPCB - State Pollution Control Board SPM - Suspended Particulate Matter SO2 - Sulphur dioxide STP - Sewage Treatment Plant SYI - Silt Yield Index SVCC - Sainj Valley Conservation Cell VAM - Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrizae WAPCOS - Water and Power Consultancy Services (I) Limited

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-1

CHAPTER 1 COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN

1.1 INTRODUCTION Conservation is the sustainable use of natural resources, and is achieved through implementation of various measures that minimize the adverse impacts likely to accrue as a result of any developmental activity or any other form of human interferences. In the present project threats may arise as a result of construction of barrage and associated activities of proposed Shongtong-Karchham hydroelectric project (STKHEP). Compensatory afforestation is provided primarily to offset impacts due to diversion of forest land and also addresses likely disruptive activities, e.g. road construction, blasting, excavation for tunnels, quarrying, dumping of excavated material and human population pressure on land and biological resources. In view of the foreseen disturbance and degradation of natural ecosystems, a compensatory afforestation plan and biodiversity conservation and management plan has been proposed for Shongtong-Karchham hydroelectric project.

1.2 ACQUISITION OF FOREST LAND The forest land required for the proposed Shongtong-Karchham hydroelectric project is 63.5015 ha. The forest in the project area is under stress due to the human settlement, agriculture activities, grazing in the forest which generally contributes to degradation of forest. Due to construction of barrage, clearing of vegetation, movement of vehicles for transportation of construction material, widening of road, stocking of construction materials, erection of temporary labour sheds and excavation, etc. forest area is put to some stress, even if preventive measures are enforced.

During reservoir filling a reservoir is created leading to loss of vegetal cover. The species density and diversity in the proposed submergence area is not significant. About 131 trees of all age classes and a variety of species and other vegetation will be cleared from the proposed submergence area as Table 1.1 provides the details of trees required cutting from submergence area and figure 1.1 provide the view of submergence area of project.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS center for Environment 1-2

Figure 1.1: Submergence area of Shongtong - Karchham hydroelectric project

Table1.1: Details of trees to be felled in Submergence area.

Sl. No. Species Diameter Class-wise number of Trees Total

V IV III IIA IIB IA IB IC ID IE 1 Deodar 0 2 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 18

2 Neoza 14 19 32 17 12 8 4 1 1 0 108 3 Bray

(Q. ilex) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Other B/L 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5

Total Trees 131

In addition, forest land is to be acquired for other project appurtenances as well. The total forest loss including submergence area and other project appurtenance is about 63.5015 Ha. Since, in Himachal Pradesh, non-forest land is not available, it is proposed to afforest double the amount of forest land being acquired for the project. Thus, a total of 128 Ha of land needs to be afforested. The Afforestation work is to be done by Forest Department. The detailed map of the proposed sites for Compensatory Afforestation and the scheme are shown as per Annexure -1.1.

The Indian Forest Conservation Act (1980) states that:

- If non-forest land is not available, compensatory Afforestation are to be established on degraded forest lands, which must be twice the forest area affected or lost, and

- If non- forest land is available, compensatory forest are to be raised over an area equivalent to the forest area affected or lost.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-3

Compensatory Afforestation and CAT Plan are carried out by HP Forests Department as the land is owned and managed by Forests Department, GoHP. As such the project proponent has no control on these activities, although the project proponent is funding them. There is an inherent flexibility to executing agency (Forest Department) to make changes in location and type of species for afforestation which may or may not be communicated to project proponent. Compensatory Afforestation scheme and CAT plans have their own monitoring components.

Currently, the HP Forest Department is preparing Master CAT Plan for Satluj basin which will supersede all the individual CAT Plan of each project in the basin. The cost of CAT Plan is now regulated as per Government notification No. FFE-B-F-(2)-72/2004-Pt-II, dated 30/09/2009 where it was notified that the total cost of CAT Plan has to be at least 2.5% of the total project cost, at the time of processing of clearance proposal under FCA 1980 and EPA 1984.

The cost for Afforestation is Rs 16.65 million. The details are given in Tables of the Annexure 1.1. The NPV for the forests is estimated as Rs. 36.83 million (Refer Table-1.2). The cost of trees in the forest land to be acquired is Rs 6.47 million. Calculation of Net Present Value (NPV) of forest land to be diverted under FCA 1980, in favor of HP Power Corporation Limited for construction of 450 MW capacity of the HEP Shongtong – Karchham HEP in Kalpa & Kilba Range, Kinnaur Forest Division, District. Kinnaur (H.P.) is given in Table - 1.3.

TABLE - 1.2: Calculation of Net Present Value of Forest land to be diverted

1. Area being diverted 63.5015 Ha 2. Total trees in the forest land to be diverted 1,006 Nos. 3. Trees below III class 432 Nos. 4. Trees III Class and above 577 Nos. 5. Conversion of below III class trees into III class and

above trees by taking 2 trees of below III class as one tree of higher class

432 trees below III class; 216 trees in III class and above

6. Therefore total trees up to III class and above 793 Nos. 7. Number of trees in 635,015 sq. m. land area 793 Nos. 8. Number of trees per ha 12 trees

9. If 400 trees fall in III class and above per Ha, then density = 100%

10. If 12 trees fall in III class and above per Ha, then the density = 3.12%

11. Rates applicable for forest having density below 10% forest cover

580,000/-

12. For one Ha, NPV chargeable as per notification 580,000/ per ha 13. For 63.5015 Ha, forest land NPV chargeable 580,000 x 63.5015 Amount (Rs.) 36,830,870/-

Say Rs. 36.83 million

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS center for Environment 1-4

TABLE-1.3 : Cost of Trees which are coming in the proposed land for Diversion in favor of HPPCL for the construction of 450 MW

Shongtong-Karchham HEP in Kalpa and Kilba Range, Kinnaur Forest Division, district. Kinnaur

S. No.

Species Classification of Tree Total V IV III IIA IIB IA IB IC ID IE

1.

Deodar 0 3 10 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 Rate per tree

1,002 7,679 23,706 56,761 85,142 113,523 141,903 160,601 160,601 160,601

Amount 0 23,037 237,060 397,327 85,142 0 0 0 0 0 742,566

2. Neoza 68 86 102 66 51 25 5 1 1 1 406 Rate per t

191 1,590 4,452 9,222 0 13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250 0 Amount 12,988 136,740 454,104 608,652 0 331,250 66,250 13,250 0 1,623,234

3. Bray 86 70 53 21 7 6 3 1 1 0 248 Rate per 2,412 5,634 11,826 21,618 35,532 53,928 77,130 10,542 139,014 0 Amount 207,432 394,380 626,778 453,978 248,724 323,568 231,390 10,5426 139,014 0 2,730,690

4 Other B/L

160 104 39 10 11 4 2 0 1 0 331 Rate per t

521 1,629 3,922 7,401 12,061 17,905 24,930 33,140 0 0 Amount 83,360 169,416 152,958 74,010 132,671 71,620 49,860 0 0 0 733,895

Total Trees 1,006 Total Royalty 5,750,885 VAT 12.5% 718,861 Total amount in Rs. 6.47 million

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-5

1.3 ANTI-POACHING MEASURES Compliance with local and national laws for all anti-poaching measures has been made mandatory for the contractor through appropriate conditions in the contract documents. Offences will be dealt under Wildlife Protection Act 1972 which provides for penalties including imprisonment.

The vigilance committees are constituted by the Wildlife Division under Forest Department which carries out necessary inspections/checks and the penalties are levied by the office of District Forest Officer (Wildlife Division). Project Proponent and its contractors shall cooperate with the Forest department in facilitating such checks and inspections.

During construction phase, marginal impacts may felt be on wild life near main construction areas, i.e. the barrage site, powerhouse site, etc. where construction workers congregate, some disturbance to the wildlife population may occur. Therefore, in view of this it is recommended that 3 check posts be developed. The location of these check posts could be:

• Upstream of barrage site; • Downstream of power house site; • Labour camp; Each check post shall have 3 guards to ensure that poaching does not take place in the area. The guards will be supervised by a Deputy Range Officer. It is also recommended that the staff managing these check posts have adequate communication equipment and other facilities. Apart from inter-linking of check posts, communication link needs to be extended to Divisional Forest Office and the local police station also.

a) Salary • Guards (9 nos.) @ Rs.10,000 per month Rs. 1,080,000 • One range officer @ Rs.20,000 per month Rs. 240,000 • Total cost for one year Rs. 1,320,000 Cost for 6 years Rs. 10.18 million (Assuming 10% increase per year) b) Construction of check posts, Rs. 1.95 million

provision of arm & ammunition, Communication system, etc.

(Rs. 650,000 * 3) Total Cost Rs.12.13 million 1.4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN During the construction phase, no adverse impacts on the wildlife are anticipated as projected is located suitably away from the any designated wildlife protected area, further chances of such impacts can be reduce by various measures recommended to avoid such impacts are given as below:

• Joint checking and inspection by Project staff under coordination with HP Forest Department.

• There will be strict monitoring of laborers and workers for any activity related to

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-6

endangering the life or habitat of wild animals and birds. Workers will not be allowed to harvest any species/produce from the natural forests and cause any danger or harm to the animals and birds in the wild.

• Minimum levels of noise during construction activities will be maintained and no activity will be carried out at night i.e. sunset to sunrise to minimize noise impacts on wildlife.

• The fuel wood to the laborers will be provided from authorized source only meant and provision has been made for supply of the free subsidized kerosene/LPG from the depots being set up for this purpose to avoid forest degradation and animal habitats. Community kitchen will be provided for labour and staff by the project proponents and/or its contractors.

• Labour camps should not be located close to forest areas. • Blasting to be restricted only during day time hours. • The interference of labour camps with the forests would be kept minimum and it

would be ensured that the contractors do not set up laborer colonies in the vicinity of forests and wilderness areas.

• Strict noise control measures should be followed as per EMP and CPCB standards.

• Use of temporary sound fences or barriers to be evaluated. • Notice will be placed informing residents within 300 feet (about 90 to 100 m) of

major noise generating activities. The notice will describe the noise abatement measures that will be implemented.

• Monitoring of noise levels should be conducted during the construction phase of the project. In case of the noise levels by machinery used at the site exceed the specified noise levels; the contractor should take adequate steps to remedy the situation.

1.5 BUDGET A total provision of Rs. 72.08 million has been earmarked for biodiversity conservation forest diversion and anti-poaching measures. The details are given in Table-1.4.

TABLE-1.4: Budget for implementation of compensatory Afforestation and Anti-poaching measures

Item Cost (Rs million) Compensatory Afforestation 16.65 NPV 36.83 Anti-poaching measures 12.13 Cost of Forest trees needed to cut 6.47 Total 72.08

All costs released by the project proponents towards Compensatory Afforestation, Net Present Value (NPV) and CAT Plan implementation are deposited in an ad hoc fund (established by a Supreme Court order) controlled by the Central Government and managed by the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA). The Authority has to accomplish the compensatory afforestation for which money is deposited in the fund within a specific period of after project completion. The funds from CAMPA are transferred to State CAMPA for executing the Compensatory Afforestation Scheme, CAT Plan and further activities from NPV towards biodiversity conservation, environment improvement including anti-poaching measure mainly through the State Forest Department.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-7

ANNEXURE – 1.1

Location and size of compensatory afforestation area

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-8

COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION SCHEME (As given by the Office of DFO Kinnaur)

Detail scheme for Compensatory Afforestation to be carried out in respect of diversion of 63.5015 ha of forest land for the construction of Shongtong – Karchham HEP.

1. Details of degraded forest land/ non forest land:- District : Kinnaur Village: : Ralli/ Barang/Powari/ Roghi/ Kalpa/Shongtong Tehsil : Kalpa Name of the forest Division : Kinnaur at Rekong Peo Range : Kilba & Kalpa Block/Compartment/Survey No : C-170 (15 Ha), C-169 (15 Ha), C-172(a) (10 Ha),

C-167 (25 Ha), C-174 (15 Ha), C-239 (20 Ha),C-176 (15 Ha) & C- 241 (13 Ha)

Area to be afforested : 128 ha. 2. Description of Area • Whether the site for CA land bank or not – Yes; • If the CA site is other than the land bank, reasons be given – NA; • In case non forest area identified for CA then what is the distance of CA site from

the adjoining boundary – NA as the area identified is forest land; • Topography Hilly and medium slope; • Whether the area is bearing any root stock of vegetation – NO; 3. Plantation Model Copy of approved CA Scheme / Model showing component wise Physical and financial break up is enclosed.

4. Schedule of Plantation Program Detail of year wise break up of requirement of funds is enclosed.

5. Technical details

• General details – An area of 128 hectares will be taken up for plantation under CA scheme in C-128, UF – 46 and UF – 47 land bank area for CA in this division. The area will be protected by RCC fence post fencing and a mixture of conifer and broad leaved species will be planted. 1500 plants will be planted per hectare.

• Spacement: 3m X 3m

• Species: Cedrus deodara, Prendoacacia, Prunus persica, Pranus armenica etc.

• Plantation method : Nursery grown one to two and half year old plants in polythene bags as well as naked roots will be planted in 30 x 30 x 30 cm and 45 x 45 x 45 cm pits in the selected area. Bush cutting will be done in the infested area. The plantation will be maintained for subsequent 7 years in which beating up of the failures will be done. The plantation will be rain fed.

• Soil and Moisture conservation work: trenching will be done in the entire area to conserve the available moisture during rainy season so that the moisture regime in the area is improved. Minor soil conservation work like gully plugging, check walls will be carried out where required.

• Protection: Area will be protected from grazing by creating barbed wire fencing at

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-9

all vulnerable places around the plantation. Further, watch and ward as also fire protection will be ensured through regular departmental staff.

• Proposed monitoring mechanism – the plantation will be monitored as per existing monitoring mechanism of the Forest department. The plantation will also be monitored by GoI representatives as per instructions.

General abstract of Compensatory afforestation on degraded forest land over 128 ha area in lieu of diversion of 63.5015 Ha of forest land in favour of H.P. Power Corporation Ltd. for the construction of Shongtong-Karchham (450 MW) HEP in Kalpa & Kilba Range, Kinnaur Forest Division, district Kinnaur (H.P.) is given in table 1.

TABLE - 1

S. No.

Particular Area (ha) Rate (Rs/ha)

Amount (Rs)

1. Cost of afforestation including cost of material (Refer Table-2)

128.00 39,000 4,992,000

2. Ist year maintenance (Refer Table-3) 128.00 6,160 788,480 3. 2nd year maintenance (Refer Table-4) 128.00 5,490 702,720 4. 3rd year maintenance (Refer Table-5) 128.00 4,370 559,360 5. 4th year maintenance (Refer Table-6) 128.00 3,750 480,000 6. 5th year maintenance (Refer Table-7) 128.00 2,880 368,640 7. 6th year maintenance (Refer Table-8) 128.00 2,430 311,040 8. 7th year maintenance (Refer Table-9) 128.00 2,430 311,040 Total 8,513,280 11 Contingencies (5% of Total Cost) 425,664 Total 8,938,944 12 Departmental Charges @ 17.5% 1,564,315 13 G. Total 10,503,259

Bill for Angle Iron fence posts to be used in CA Area S. No.

No. of Angle Iron Fence Posts per ha Total No. of fence posts to be used

Rate per Fence posts

Total Amount in Rs.

14 60 7,680 800 6,144,000 15 Total 6,144,000 16 Total amount payable (S. No. 13 + 15) 16,647,259 Or say Rs. 16.65

million

TABLE - 2 Per Hectare cost Model for Compensatory Afforestation of Degraded Forest Land Calculations based on average on 5 Ha plot of 250 x 200 M for in respect of Kinnaur Forest Division.

S. No. Particulars of works Quantity Rate Amount (Rs.)

1. Survey and demarcation of plantation area including marking of sections, I/path and preparation of map

1 Ha 47.78 per Ha 47.78

2. Carriage of angle iron fence post up to 2 m long and 8 to 10 cm dia over distance 1 km

60 Nos. 318.15 per hundred per km

190.89

3. Preparation/digging of holes 20-30 cm dia 60 Nos. 423.28 per 253.97

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-10

S. No. Particulars of works Quantity Rate Amount (Rs.)

and 45 cm deep hundred 4. Fixing of angle iron fence posts 60 Nos. 324.87 per

hundred 194.92

5. Carriage of B/wire over average distance of 1 km up hills

1 quintal.

79.62 per quintals per km

79.62

6. Stretching and fixing of barbed wire in each stand (3 stands)

540 Rmt.

2.20 per Rmt. 1188

7. Bush cutting in the plantation site 1 Ha 557 per Ha 557 8. Interlacing of thorny bushes in B/wire

obtained from 180 Rmt.

1.92 per Rmt. 345.60

9. Preparation of inspection path 60 cm wide 250 Rmt.

5.07 per Rmt 1267.50

10. Layout of pits over 1 Ha 79.50 79.50 11. Digging of pits 45x45x45 cm (40% of total) 440

Nos. 445.45 per hundred

1959.98

12. Digging of pits 30x30x30 cm (60% of total) 660 Nos.

222.78 per hundred

1470.35

13. Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 440 Nos.

127.64 per hundred

561.62

14. Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm (60% of total) 660 Nos.

89.07 per hundred

587.86

15. Carriage of naked root plants over distance 2 km up

400 Nos.

16.45 per hundred

131.57

16. Carriage of plants in P/bags over distance 2 km up hills

700 Nos.

101.79 per hundred/km

1425.02

17. Planting of entire plants raised in P/bags 700 Nos.

101.85 per hundred

712.96

18. Planting of Naked root plants 400 Nos.

85.87 per hundred

334.48

19. Nursery cost of plants 1,100 Nos.

4.30 per plants 4730

20 Total 16,118.62

21 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 6,906.83 22. Total 23,025.4

5 23. Soil and moisture conservation works

(25% of initial) 1 Ha 25% initial

planting 5,756.36

24. Total 28,781.81

25. Add Tribal increase 25% 7,195.453 26 Total 35,977.2

6 27 Add cost of B/wire including cost of U

nails 75 kg 40 kg 3,000.00

28 G. Total 38,977.26 Or say 39,000.00 Rmt - Running meter

TABLE - 3: 1st Year Maintenance 25 % Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 110 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 245.05

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-11

2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 165 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 183.75 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 110 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 140.4 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 165 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 146.96 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 175 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 178.24 6 Planting of Naked root plants 100 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 85.87 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 175 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 356.25

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

100 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 16.45

9 Nursery cost of plants 275 Nos 4.30 per plants 1,182.00 10 Repair of fence 180 Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 136.00 11 Repair of inspection path L/S 323.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 455.00

13 Total 3,448.97 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 1,477.88 15 Total 4,926.85 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 1,231.71 17 G. Total 6,158.57 18 Or say 6,160.00

TABLE - 4: 2nd Year Maintenance 20% Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 88 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 196.05 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 132 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 147.00 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 88 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 112.32 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 132 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 117.56 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 140 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 142.59 6 Planting of Naked root plants 80 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 69.70 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 140 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 285.00

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

80 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 27.31

9 Nursery cost of plants 220 Nos 4.30 per plants 1063.00 10 Repair of fence 180

Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 135.00

11 Repair of inspection path L/S 323.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 455.00

13 Total 3,073.53 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 1,317.01 15 Total 4,390.54 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 1,097.63 17 G. Total 5,488.17 18 Or say 5,490.00

TABLE - 5: 3rd Year Maintenance 15 % Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 147.03 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 110.25 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 84.24

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-12

S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 88.17 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 105 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 106.94 6 Planting of Naked root plants 60 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 51.52 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km up hills 105 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 213.74

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

60 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 19.73

9 Nursery cost of plants 165 Nos 4.30 per plants 710.00 10 Repair of fence 200 Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 140.00 11 Repair of inspection path L/S 323.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 455.00

13 Total 2,449.62 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 1,049.66 15 Total 3,499.28 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 874.82 17 G. Total 4,374.10 18 Or say 4,370.00

TABLE - 6: 4th Year Maintenance 15 % Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 147.03 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 110.25 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 84.24 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 88.17 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 105 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 106.94 6 Planting of Naked root plants 60 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 51.52 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 105 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 213.74

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

60 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 19.73

9 Nursery cost of plants 165 Nos 4.30 per plants 710.00 10 Repair of fence 200

Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 140.00

11 Repair of inspection path L/S 215.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 215.00

13 Total 2,101.62 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 900.54 15 Total 3,002.16 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 750.54 17 G. Total 3,752.71 18 Or say 3,750.00

TABLE - 7: 5th Year Maintenance 10 % Mortality

S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.02 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.49 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.16 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.78

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-13

S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

5 Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.30 6 Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.35 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9 Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos 4.30 per plants 473.00 10 Repair of fence 200

Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 150.00

11 Repair of inspection path L/S 215.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 215.00

Total 1,611.72 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 690.62 Total 2,302.34 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 575.59 17 G. Total 2,877.93 18 Or say 2,880.00

TABLE - 8: 6th Year Maintenance 10 % Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.02 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.49 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.16 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.78 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.30 6 Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.35 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9 Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos 4.30 per plants 473.00 10 Repair of fence 150

Rmt 0.75 per Rmt. 115.00

11 Repair of inspection path L/S 108.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 108.00

13 Total 1,362.72 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 583.93 15 Total 1,946.65 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 486.66 17 G. Total 2,433.31 18 Or say 2,430.00

TABLE - 9: 7th Year Maintenance 10 % Mortality S. No.

Particulars of works Qty. Rate Amount (Rs.)

1 Redigging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.02 2 Redigging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.49 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.16

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for environment 1-14

4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.78 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.30 6 Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.35 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km uphill 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9 Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos

4.30 per plants 473.00

10 Repair of fence 150 Rmt

0.75 per Rmt. 115.00

11 Repair of inspection path L/S 108.00 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 108.00

13 Total 1,362.72 14 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January 2008 583.93 15 Total 1,946.65 16 Add Tribal increase 25% 486.66 17 G. Total 2,433.31 18 Or say 2,430.00

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-1

CHAPTER 2 CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN

2.1. GENERAL The Shongtong - Karchham Hydro Electric Project is proposed to be commissioned on river Satluj in district Kinnaur of Himachal Pradesh. The project is envisaged as a run-of the river Scheme. The proposed barrage site is near village Powari and the power house is proposed to be located near village Ralli on left bank of river near confluence of Baspa River with Satluj. The Shongtong - Karchham hydro-electric project is proposed to generate 450 MW of hydropower.

2.2. PROJECT DETAILS The Shongtong-Karchham Hydro Electric Project has been envisaged with the purpose of exploiting the potential in the Satluj River between villages Powari and Ralli. The project envisages the construction of:

- Diversion barrage, intake structure with 4 intake bays with gates and four intake tunnels passing through four sedimentation chambers.

- Head Race Tunnel 8.02 km long culminating in open surface surge shaft. - Three circular steel lined underground pressure shafts to convey water to 3 Francis

turbines to generate (3 x 150 MW) 450 MW of power in an underground power house. - Tail Race Tunnel of 10.0 m dia and 90 m length to discharge flow into river Satluj near

village Ralli. The salient features of the project are given in Table-2.1 and the Drainage map of catchment area shown in Figure-2.1. TABLE-2.1: Salient features of Shongtong-Karchham hydro-electric project

Location State Himachal Pradesh District Kinnaur River Satluj Location Diversion barrage site near village Powari Power House site near village Ralli on NH-22

about 200 km from Shimla Hydrology Catchment area at barrage axis 47,132 sq km Maximum observed average 10 1,666 cumec Daily discharge Design flood 6,819 cumec Firm discharge for 90% availability 67.39cumec 50% availability 131.88 cumec Diversion Barrage Type Sloping Glacis Size 122.6m long at top of barrage Water Bay 87.0 m Top level of Barrage El. 1,958.00 m Full Reservoir Level (FRL) El. 1,956.00 m Maximum Pond Level El. 1,956.00 m Mean Draw Down Level (MDDL) El. 1,945.50 m Crest level El. 1,937.00 m Live storage 431 Ha m. Peaking 3.6 hrs

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-2

River Bed Level at Barrage axis + El. 1,934.000 m Length of stilling basin 55.00 m Diversion Tunnel Type Circular concrete lined Size 10.0 m dia Length 1658.72 m Bed Slope 1 : 553 Intake structure No. of intake bays 4 Width of each bay 17.17 m Discharge through each bay 101.80 cumec Crest level 1,938.00 m Minimum water level u/s El. 1,945.50 m No. of Intake Gates 4 Size 6.40m x 6.40 m Intake Tunnels No. of Intake Tunnels 4 Type Modified horse shoe Size 6.4 m Design discharge 487.2 cumec Velocity 2.41 m/sec Sedimentation Chambers No. of sedimentation chambers 4 Width 15 m Depth 31 m Length 530 m Particle size to be arrested +0.20 mm Design discharge 487.2 cumec Flow through velocity 0.22 m/s Silt Flushing Tunnels No. of tunnels from the sedimentation Chambers connected with main silt Flushing tunnel

4

Type D-shaped Diameter 3.0 m Length 70 m Main Silt Flushing Tunnel Type D-shaped, concrete lined Diameter 6.00 m Length 2010.00 m Design discharge 81.2 cumec Head Race Tunnel Type Circular concrete lined Diameter 10.00 m finished Length 8,042.69 m Design discharge 406 cumec Bed slope 1:280.61 Velocity 5.17 m/sec Adits No. of Adits 3

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-3

Type D-shaped Size 7.5 m Length 368.00 m (max.) Surge Shaft No. One Type Restricted Orifice (Underground) Diameter 35.0 m Orifice Dia. 5.54 Elevation of centre line of HRT 1905.00 m Elevation at invert of surge shaft 1900.00 m Top elevation 1,982.00 m Maximum upsurge level 1,978.00 m Minimum down surge level 1,919.34 m Pressure Shaft No. 3 Type Circular steel lined (Underground) Diameter 5.80 m (Finished) Length 240.00 m each Power House/Transformer Hall cavity Type Underground Installed capacity 450 MW (3 x 150 MW) Size of machine Hall 120m (L) x 19 m (W) x 40.10 m (H) Size of transformer Hall 120 m (L) x 18 m (W) x 28 m (H) Approach adit to machine hall 8.5 m D-shaped 218.95 m long Average gross head 142.50 m Net head 124.01 m Tail Race Tunnel Size & Type 10.00 m dia. Circular shape Length 99.66 m Normal tail water level 1,804.65 m Maximum tail water level 1,810.12 m Power Generation Installed capacity 450 MW Annual generation : 90% dependable Year 1,653.13 GWh 50% dependable year 1,887.23 GWh COST ESTIMATE (Rs. In Crores) Civil Works Rs. 1,455.65 Electro-Mechanical Works Rs. 823.51 Total base cost of Project Rs. 2,279.16 Crores (Dec, 2010 Price Level) Financial Aspects Cost per MW of installed capacity Rs. 3.77 crores Sale rate per unit (at bus bar) First year Rs. 3.31 per unit Tenth year Rs. 2.33 per unit Average for 10 years Rs. 2.82 per unit

The project is expected to provide annual energy generation of about 1,735.5 MU in a 90% dependable year. The project shall also provide peaking capacity benefits of 450 MW for about

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-4

4 hours per day during lean season. The project will be constructed in a period of 6 years.

2.3. NEED FOR CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT It is a well-established fact that reservoirs formed by dams on rivers are subjected to sedimentation. The process of sedimentation embodies the sequential processes of erosion, entrainment, transportation, deposition and compaction of sediment. The study of erosion and sediment yield from catchments is of utmost importance as the deposition of sediment in reservoir reduces its capacity, and thus affecting the water availability for the designated use. The eroded sediment from catchment when deposited on streambeds and banks causes braiding of river reach. The removal of top fertile soil from catchment adversely affects the agricultural production. Thus, a well-designed Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) Plan is essential to ameliorate the above-mentioned adverse process of soil erosion.

Soil erosion may be defined as the detachment and transportation of soil. Water is the major agent responsible for this erosion. In many locations, winds, glaciers, etc. also cause soil erosion. In a hilly catchment area as in the present case erosion due to water is a common phenomenon and the same has been studied as a part of the Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) Plan.

The Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) plan highlights the management techniques for to control erosion in the catchment area of a water resource project. The life span of a reservoir is greatly reduced due to erosion in the catchment area. Adequate preventive measures are thus needed for the treatment of catchment for its stabilization against future erosion. Watershed diagram with villages location in the catchment area considered for the present study is given in Annexure -2.3.

The catchment area treatment involves:

• Understanding of the erosion characteristics of the terrain and, • Suggesting remedial measures to reduce the erosion rate. 2.4. SILT YIELD INDEX (SYI) METHOD In the present study `Silt Yield Index’ (SYI), method has been used. In this method, the terrain is subdivided into various watersheds and the erodibility is determined on relative basis. SYI provides a comparative erodibility criteria of catchment (low, moderate, high, etc.) and do not provide the absolute silt yield. SYI method is widely used mainly because of the fact that it is easy to use and has lesser data requirement. Moreover, it can be applied to larger areas like sub-watersheds, etc.

A detailed database on natural resources, terrain conditions, soil type of the catchment area, socio-economic status, etc. is a pre-requisite to prepare treatment plan keeping in view the concept of sustainable development. Various thematic maps have been used in preparation of the CAT plan. Due to the spatial variability of site parameters such as soils, topography, land use and rainfall, not all areas contribute equally to the erosion problem. Several techniques like manual overlay of spatially index-mapped data have been used to estimate soil erosion in complex landscapes.

Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computerized resource data base system, which is referenced to some geographic coordinate system. In the present study, real coordinate system has been used. The GIS is a tool to store, analyze and display various spatial data. In addition, GIS because of its special hardware and software characteristics, has a capacity to perform numerous functions and operations on the various spatial data layers residing in the database. GIS provides the capability to analyze large amounts of data in relation to a set of established criteria.

In order to ensure that latest and accurate data is used for the analysis, satellite data has been used for deriving land use data and ground truth studies too have been conducted. The various

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-5

steps covered in the study are as follows:

• Data acquisition • Data preparation • Output presentation 2.4.1 Data Acquisition The requirement of the study was first defined and the outputs expected were noted. The various data layers of the catchment area used for the study are as follows:

• Slope Map • Soil Map • Land use Classification Map • Current Management Practices • Catchment Area Map.

2.4.2 Data Preparation The data available from various sources was collected. The ground maps, contour information, etc. were scanned, digitized and registered as per the requirement. Data was prepared depending on the level of accuracy required and any corrections required were made. All the layers were geo-referenced and brought to a common scale (real coordinates), so that overlay could be performed. A computer programme was used to estimate the soil loss. The formats of outputs from each layer were firmed up to match the formats of inputs in the program. The grid size to be used was also decided to match the level of accuracy required, the data availability and the software and time limitations. The format of output was finalized. Ground truthing and data collection was also included in the procedure.

For the present study IRS P6-LISS III digital satellite data was used for interpretation and classification. The classified land use map of the catchment area considered for the study is shown as Figure- 2.2. The land use pattern of the catchment area is summarized in Table-2.2.

TABLE-2.2: Land use pattern of the catchment area S. No. Category Area in Ha (%) 1. Dense vegetation 6,388 (19.03) 2. Open vegetation 889 (2.65) 3. Alpine Pasture 3,303 (9.84) 4. Barren lands 16,663 (49.63) 5. Water bodies 365 (1.09) 6. Snow cover 5,965 (17.75) Total 33,573 (100.00) Digitized contours from top sheets were used for preparation of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the catchment area and to prepare a slope map. The first step in generation of slope map is to create surface using the elevation values stored in the form of contours or points. After marking the catchment area, all the contours on the top sheet were digitized (100 m interval). The output of the digitization procedure was the contours as well as points contours in form of x, y & z points. (x, y location and their elevation). All this information was in real world coordinates (latitude, longitude and height in meters above sea level).

A Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of the area was then prepared, which was used to derive a slope map. The slope was divided in classes of slope percentages. The slope map is enclosed as Figure

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-6

– 2.3. Various layers thus prepared were used for Modeling. Software was prepared to calculate the soil loss using input from all the layers.

2.4.3 Output Presentation The result of the modeling was interpreted in pictorial form to identify the areas with high soil erosion rates. The primary and secondary data collected as a part of the field studies were used as an input for the model.

2.5. ESTIMATION OF SOIL LOSS USING SILT YIELD INDEX (SYI) METHOD The Silt Yield Index Model (SYI), considering sedimentation as product of erosivity, erodibility and areal extent was conceptualized in the All India Soil and Land Use Survey (AISLUS) as early as 1969 and has been in operational use since then to meet the requirements of prioritization of smaller hydrologic units. The erosivity determinants are the climatic factors and soil and land attributes that have direct or reciprocal bearing on the unit of the detached soil material. The relationship can be expressed as:

Soil erosivity = f (Climate, physiography, slope, soil parameters, land use/land cover, soil management)

Silt Yield Index The Silt Yield Index (SYI) is defined as the Yield per unit area and SYI value for hydrologic unit is obtained by taking the weighted arithmetic mean over the entire area of the hydrologic unit by using suitable empirical equation.

Prioritization of Watersheds/Sub watersheds The prioritization of smaller hydrologic units within the vast catchments is based on the Silt Yield Indices (SYI) of the smaller units. The boundary values or range of SYI values for different priority categories are arrived at by studying the frequency distribution of SYI values and locating the suitable breaking points. The watersheds/ sub-watersheds are subsequently rated into various categories corresponding to their respective SYI values.

The application of SYI model for prioritization of sub watersheds in the catchment areas involves the evaluation of:

• Climatic factors comprising total precipitation, its frequency and intensity, • Geomorphic factors comprising land forms, physiography, slope and drainage

characteristics, • Surface cover factors governing the flow hydraulics and • Management factors. The data on climatic factors can be obtained for different locations in the catchment area from the meteorological stations whereas the field investigations are required for estimating the other attributes.

The various steps involved in the application of model are:

- Preparation of a framework of sub-watersheds through systematic delineation

- Rapid reconnaissance surveys on 1:50,000 scale leading to the generation of a map indicating erosion-intensity mapping units.

- Assignment of weightage values to various mapping units based on relative silt-yield potential.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-7

- Computing Silt Yield Index for individual watersheds/sub watersheds.

- Grading of watersheds/sub watersheds into very high, high medium, low and very low priority categories.

The area of each of the mapping units is computed and silt yield indices of individual sub watersheds are calculated using the following equation:

a. Silt Yield Index

SYI = Σ (Ai x Wi ) x 100 ; where i = 1 to n

Aw

where

Ai = Area of ith unit (EIMU) Wi = Weightage value of ith mapping unit n = No. of mapping units Aw = Total area of sub-watershed. The SYI values for classification of various categories of erosion intensity rates are given in Table-2.3.

TABLE- 2.3: Criteria for erosion intensity rate Priority categories SYI Values Very high > 1,300 High 1,200-1,299 Medium 1,100-1,199 Low 1,000-1,099 Very Low <1,000 2.6. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT – AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES Watershed management is the optimal use of soil and water resources within a given geographical area so as to enable sustainable production. It implies changes in land use, vegetative cover, and other structural and non-structural action that are taken in a watershed to achieve specific watershed management objectives. The overall objectives of watershed management program are to:

- increase infiltration into soil - control excessive runoff - manage and utilize runoff for useful purpose.

Following Engineering and Biological measures have been suggested for the catchment area treatment. Engineering measures

- Step drain - Check dams

Biological measures - Afforestation /Plantation - Pasture development - NTFP Plantation including medicinal plants - Development of nurseries

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-8

The description of various catchment area treatment measures recommended as a part of CAT Plan of the proposed Shongtong-Karchham hydroelectric project is given in the following paragraphs: i) Step Drain: Step drain is recommended in the steep streams where soil erosion is high.

The stepped drain can be concrete drain (2-3 ft. steps) or steps can be developed with sausage wall or combination of sausage walls and dry walls. The steps in the drain help in reducing the current of water which reduces the soil erosion.

ii) Check dam: The check dam will be provided with stone masonry and G.I. crate walls in the nalah where less vegetative cover and erosion is high.

iii) Afforestation: A well-stocked forest plays a very important role in control of soil erosion. Thus, it is proposed to increase the vegetal cover in the area. For this purpose, barren areas, devoid of tree growth have been recommended to be brought under afforestation. As a part of the CAT Plan, replenishment afforestation/gap plantation has been recommended.

Many of the forest areas have been depleted due to excessive pressure of local population for timber, fuel wood and fodder. The natural regeneration is absent as a result of increased human interferences. For such forest areas, it is proposed to increase the stocking by artificial regeneration. About 600 to 800 trees per ha are proposed to be planted as a part of this measure.

iv) Pasture development: Barren lands with slopes greater than 40% have been recommended to be treated by developing pastures over them. Fodder development has been recommended in vicinity to the villages within the catchment. This will reduce the pressure on pasture land being developed as a part of the catchment area treatment plan.

v) Development of nursery: Development of nursery is done to provide saplings for various plantation works. Nurseries have been recommended as a part of the CAT Plan in various sub-watersheds covered as a part of the CAT Plan. The size of the nursery can be 1 to 1.5 Ha and about 10,000 saplings can be planted in the nursery.

The basis of site selection for different biological and engineering treatment measures under CAT are given in Table - 2.4.

TABLE- 2.4: Basis for selection of catchment area treatment measures Treatment measure Basis for selection

Pasture Development Open canopy, barren land, degraded surface Afforestation Open canopy, degraded surface, high soil erosion, gentle to moderate

slope Step drain To check soil erosion in small streams, steps with concrete base are

prepared in sloppy area where silt erosion in the stream and bank erosion is high due to turbidity of current.

Check dam Stone masonry with cement mortar in 1:6 with concrete base 1:4:8 and G.I. crate walls on steep slopes, sliding surfaces, where less vegetative cover and silt erosion is high

Nursery Centrally located points for better supervision of proposed afforestation, minimize cost of transportation of seedling and ensure better survival.

2.7. CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT MEASURES The total directly draining catchment area is 33,573 Ha. The erosion category of various watershed

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-9

in the catchment area as per a SYI index are given in Tables- 2.5 and 6. The details are shown in Figure-2.4.

TABLE- 2.5: Erosion intensity categorization as per SYI classification Watershed number Area (Ha) SYI values Category W1 4,111 1,244 High W2 3,127 1,240 High W3 1,209 1,250 High W4 2,708 1,230 High W5 1,539 1,219 High W6 2,253 1,261 High W7 4,670 1,119 Medium W8 5,318 1,075 Low W9 2,289 1,054 Low W10 3,125 1,026 Low W11 3,224 1,104 Medium Total 3,3573

TABLE- 2.6: Area under various erosion categories S. No. Category Area (Ha) (%) 1. Low 10,732 (31.97) 2. Medium 7,894 (23.51) 3. High 14,947 (44.52) Total 33,573 (100.00)

The objective of the SYI method is to prioritize sub-watershed in a catchment area for treatment. The area under very high and high erosion categories is to be treated at the project proponent cost. Hence, CAT plan has been suggested for high erosion category, as a part of the present EIA study, the expenses of which have to be borne by project proponents. The area under high erosion categories is 14,947 ha, which is about 44.52% of the total catchment area intercepted at the barrage site. There is no area under very high erosion category.

2.8. TREATMENT MEASURES As per GoHP notification No., FFE-B-F-(2)-72/2004-Pt-II, dated 30/09/2009 it was notified that the minimum area to be treated under the CAT Plan would be approximately 15% of the total effective catchment area of the project. The total area under catchment for this project is 33,573 ha out of which only 2,762 Ha has been taken up for biological treatment (which is about 8.22 % of the total area). The rest of the area will be decided by the CAT Plan implementing agency (HP Forest Department) after finalizing the Integrated CAT Plan for Satluj basin which is being prepared through World Bank for entire basin within Indian territory. The corresponding additional costs to cover the balance area under the project will be met from GoHP equity at a later time. This 8.22% of the catchment area falls under HP Forest Department jurisdiction and the Forest department will decide which measures to be taken up to fulfill the condition of 15% of total effective catchment area. According to the notification of HP Government (quoted above), CAT Plan cost @ 2.5% of total project cost has been allocated (Annexure – 2.1). The provisions contained in the Integrated CAT Plan for Satluj basin falling within Indian Territory will supersede all the individual CAT Plans in the basin. The Integrated CAT Plan shall have its own monitoring mechanism which is separate from environment monitoring programme given in EMP.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-10

As a part of catchment area treatment plan, various biological as well as engineering treatment measures have been recommended. The details of the biological and engineering treatment measures recommended as a part of CAT plan are given in Tables- 2.7 and 2.8 respectively.

TABLE-2.7: Details of biological treatment measures recommended as a part of CAT plan S. No. Treatment measures Watershed No. Area (Ha) 1. Replenishment Afforestation/ Gap

Plantation (800 tree/Ha) W1 42 W2 130 W3 20 W4 119 W5 57 W6 33

Total 401 2. Pasture Development W1 310

W2 248 W3 333 W4 836 W5 549 W6 85

Total 2,361

TABLE- 2.8: Details of engineering measures recommended as a part of CAT plan S. No. Treatment measures

Watershed No. Quantity

1. Stepped drain W1 5 W2 3 W3 3 W4 4 W5 2 W6 2

Total 19 (285 Rmt) 2. Check Dam W1 5

W2 4 W3 6 W4 4 W5 3 W6 3

Total 25 2.9. JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENT Joint Forest Management (JFM) is a concept of developing partnerships between fringe forest user groups and the Forest Department (FD) on the basis of mutual trust and jointly defined

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-11

roles and responsibilities with regard to forest protection and development. In JFM, the local communities and the Forest Department manage the resource and share the cost equally. Joint management of forest lands is sharing of responsibilities, control, decision making authority and products over forest lands between government and local user groups. The primary purpose of JFM is to create conditions at the local level, which enable improvements in forest conditions and productivity. A second goal is to support a more equitable distribution of forests products than is currently the case in most areas. It is a movement towards a more democratic management of natural resources founded on the principle of equity, transparency and social justice, which aims to build collective community action deeply rooted in many rural communities. Joint forest management activities play an important role in the Catchment Area Treatment. Therefore, as a part of the JFM activities proposed for the Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project, local communities will be motivated to identify themselves with the development and protection of the forests from which they derive benefits.

2.9.1 Objectives of Joint Forest Management (JFM) The objective of the JFM is to review and study the technology and suitable silvicultural practices for increasing the productivity of degraded forests through participation of local communities. The communities are required to organize forest protection committees, village forest committees, village forest conservation and development societies, etc. Each of these bodies has an executive committee that manages its day-to-day affairs.

2.9.2 Policy Framework National forest policy 1988, envisages people's involvement in the development and protection of forests. Following the adoption of 1988 policy by the GoI, several state governments including H.P. have decided to adopt the Joint Forest Management (JFM) approach with suitable modifications. Forest Protection Committees of West Bengal, Hill Resource Management Societies of Haryana, and village Forest Committees of Karnataka are few examples. In H.P. J.F.M. has been initiated in pursuance of Government. Order No. Forest (C) 3-4/80- V dated 12 5.93. JFM activities will be governed by guidelines issued by Government. of Himachal Pradesh on PFM/JFM activities which are placed in the Annexure 2.2 and are also available on website of HP Forests Department. Implementation of JFM works shall be carried out as per the provisions of the Integrated Resource Management Plan (Micro Plan) and annual plan or operations finalised accordingly. Legal provisions, as amended from time to time, should be included in the JFM strategies. The strategies for implementation are discussed as under.

2.9.3 Strategies for implementation Primacy of people Involvement of people is the foremost aspect in JFM. Joint management must be consciously based on people, their needs, their analysis of issues and their decisions. It also implies an explicit faith that people, whatever the condition of poverty and oppression, can progress, and transform their environment without the help of donation by external agencies.

In essence, JFM demands that local people move from being objects to becoming subjects of developmental process. It must be based on bottom up approach "Only through this approach can any people oriented program attain any meaningful and lasting success. Thus, there is a need to bring in a change not only in their behavior but in attitude as well. The community awareness of the necessity and effectiveness of participation in their own development will ensure that progress shall continue even after the formalized program ends. Till now, there is hardly any' example where people's participation has continued in a real sense even after the

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-12

expiry of a particular program/project. The program's next purpose is to nurture the enthusiasm and capabilities of the user groups in order that they may attain self-sufficiency. The group members will be encouraged to identify and utilize whatever resources, however meager are available to them. Outside inputs shall be limited to the role or stimulants. Only assisting the groups in more effectively managing the own assets by using their knowledge. In no way shall the local community become dependent upon the program itself for financial and bureaucratic survival. This will not only bridge the gap between officials and people but also result in increased faith and confidence of people in Government.

Involvement of NGO's Undoubtedly NGOs have to play a significant role in creating awareness amongst people. NGOs should be involved particularly in documentation, training and community level organizing and facilitation. High people, high sounding NGOs may be of limited use in HP, context as local NGOs like Mahila Mandals, Yuvak Mandals and awakened individuals are more conversant with local customs, traditions and needs of the people and such institutions are working effectively throughout Himachal Pradesh.

Training JFM envisages frequent interaction with people on part of the staff of Forest Department. Training of staff is thus crucial for the success of JFM program. It requires extensive training and reorientation of the staff of Forest Department to function effectively in an extensive role and provide support to village management. Attitudinal changes are very important so that the forest officials do not view JFM, in total isolation nor consider it to be another Government 'scheme'. lt should not be viewed as an entry point activity and plantation, soil conservation activity only. The qualitative factors: whether the Village Forest Committee (VFC) has clearly perceived its role in effectively and judiciously reducing the consumption tends to get lost. How to train officials so that critical evaluation of these qualitative factors becomes an integral part of this program is the basic issue.

Till recently, forest officials have been depending on physical, resource and position. Use of physical power by way of policing and imposing authority, resource power by giving plethora of benefits in form of timber, fodder, MFP etc., (worth about Rs. 700 crore annually in Himachal Pradesh) and imposing one’s own wisdom by virtue of one’s position/status has not resulted in establishing a strong link with the local people. It is, therefore imperative now to concentrate on the last two powers i.e. expert power and personal power. Expert power is the power that is vested in someone because of his acknowledged expertise and personal power resides in the person and in his personality, sometimes called charisma, sometimes personality. These two powers in an official would be developed through trainings; not only in professional activities but also in extension, communication, leadership qualities etc. so that he is able to motivate people.

An appropriate training program would contain three components (1) Seminars to introduce field staff to concepts, goals, tools and the roles they are expected to play in JFM programs. (2) Field practice in JFM and (3) Extended field visits to successful JFM projects. It will be quite pertinent to mention here that attitudinal changes are required not only at the level of field functionaries but also should include the highest management and planning level including the public representatives.

2.9.4 Activities in Joint Forest Management (JFM) Major activities undertaken as part of joint forest management (JFM) in the catchment area of

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-13

Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project, includes the following:

• Institutional • Productivity • Marketing • Profit sharing

1. Institutional Arrangements

The primary objective of the JFM program includes the rehabilitation of degraded forestlands, village resource development, micro watershed to improve the socio-economic status of forest-dependent communities in order to reduce pressure on forests with peoples’ organizations e.g. Village Forest Committees – (VFC). Hence, a VFC needs to be constituted for the implementation of JFM.

2. Productivity In order to reduce pressure on forests and to provide incentives to communities for economic returns to sustain forest protection and management NTFPs like grasses, bamboo, fruits are being planted in blocks, forest blanks and along trenches, homesteads and agriculture bunds. Fuel wood is the most important commodity that people access from forest areas. Use of fuel-efficient devices like stoves and Biogas plants otherwise plantations through their agro-forestry and other plantation programs can be implemented as a part of in JFM to reduce the pressure on the forest. Non-wood forest products (NWFPs) have a key role in JFM efforts. With the increasing awareness of their economic potential and growing concerns for the sustainability of the resources and the distribution of the benefits derived from them, various state governments have taken over control of a number of NWFPs. Some of the explicit objectives for state monopoly of NWFP trade are to:

• prevent unscrupulous intermediaries and their agents from exploiting NWFP collectors: • ensure fair wages to collectors: • enhance revenue for the state: • ensure quality; • maximize the collection of produce

3. Marketing

There are three types of products available to communities in JFM areas

(i) immediate products like Non-Timber Forest Produce (NTFP), grass, fuel wood available almost immediately or after a time period depending upon the state of degradation of the forest that is being managed jointly,

(ii) intermediate products from operations like thinning, other cultural operations, and

(iii) final products like timber from felling. In majority of the States, however, JFM is still in the initial stages, and hence marketing has not emerged as an important issue for consideration.

The share of forest products to communities varies as per provisions in the various State orders for JFM. However, from the experience of different states it is evident that the VFC share is rather minimal in case of high revenue earning NTFPs. However, State agencies such as FD and FDCs do have a major role in the marketing of timber and fuel wood. Community involvement in NTFP management needs to be ensured in (i) technology for collection, preservation and regeneration; (ii) scientific harvesting and handling; and (iii) planned extraction and management based on an NTFP database are among the important

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-14

strategies that need to be adopted in JFM.

4. Benefit sharing Forest-user communities, dependent on forests for fuel wood, fodder, small timber and NTFPs, have accessed forest products under different rights regimes. Under the JFM program, residents of forest-fringe villages will be provided access to forest produce to meet their basic needs of fodder, fuel wood and NTFP. In lieu of this, people are protecting and managing the forests with the FD. Social fencing is to be practiced for forest protection by VFC’s. Regular voluntary patrolling will be done by villagers as part of their contribution. The FD is therefore benefiting from reduced workload for forest protection and also reduced expenditure on protection measures. VFCs will be entitled to a share in the timber harvest in varying proportions. Cost shared by community will be based upon sweat equity towards protection of Environment and plantation.

Further detailing with regards to the activity milestones and success indicators is not possible to provide in EMP as these are part of micro planning which will be done by the executing agency – the HP Forest Department during actual implementation using JFM practices.

2.9.5 Budget A provision of Rs. 260.0 lakh has been earmarked for implementation of measures under Joint Forest Management.

2.10. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT The proposed project is not located close to any Wildlife sanctuary or habitat areas nor any ecologically sensitive area vis-à-vis wildlife. There is no major wildlife observed in the study area. Following measures are recommended as a part of the study for wildlife management activities:

• The project authorities would ensure that strict vigil is kept especially during the breeding season of animals (between October to December) and when young ones are born/nesting season (between March to June). Activities like blasting or heavy machine operations producing noise levels more than 80-100 dB (A) will be restricted during this period. Heavy penalties would be imposed for violation of this conduct by contractors/laborers, etc. during this period. These aspects shall be included in the Tender Documents for the Contractor involved in construction works.

• Information dissemination emphasizing the need of conservation and legal consequences on violation of Forest and Wildlife (Protection) Acts will be prioritized and publicized. Awareness would also be imparted to the laborers engaged in construction activities for exerting great restraint especially during critical months of breeding and nesting of animals and birds.

• The Signboards/Notice boards highlighting penalties for violation of rules will be put nearby habitation areas of laborers. The importance of conservation of wildlife would also be emphasized.

• Education and awareness campaigns including screening of audio-visual films would be conducted stressing on environmental conservation.

• Up-gradation of check list of wildlife of the area • Infrastructure development • Control and management of forest fires • Enforcement of law • Improvement of existing waterholes and spring • Rehabilitation of a small wildlife health cum ex-situ conservation centre.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-15

• Patrolling and surveillance • Anti-poaching and hunting operational measures • Study of wildlife population during the project implementation • Eco-development and community participation

As part of the CAT Plan, the following measures are being recommended to be undertaken by the HP Forest department: Wildlife Improvement

• Intensive Management of Wildlife • Incentive to local communities for fire prevention • Incentive to local communities for fire prevention • Incentive to local communities for protection of Wildlife. Wildlife Development

• Wildlife Census; • Capacity building of staff and community; • Support for communication-mobile connectivity; • Establishment of nursery with an area of 1 Ha infrastructure for distribution of plants

to the public; • Maintenance of plants in nursery; • Soil and moisture conservation; • Monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment study.

Eco-Development Activities

• Support for vermi compost development; • Support for introduction of LPG for poor households around project area; • Socio-economic survey around project area.

A. WILDLIFE IMPROVEMENT

Intensive Management of Wildlife Since all wildlife in nature live in complex web of linkage with other organisms, the proper evaluation of habitat of each species followed by its proper management is very essential. The plant life provides a congenial habitat to wildlife. Thus, it is proposed to improve the wildlife habitat by undertaking planting and other works.

For this purpose bushy, shrubby and thick forests are to be maintained and no grass should be removed from the habitat of the wild life. In degraded forest areas, suitable species i.e. fodder and fruit bearing species will be carried out as per site location, the bank area in the forests especially in high reaches along ridge should be maintained as pasture land by sowing suitable local grasses for the benefit of wild animal. Besides this water pond/ hole should be constructed wherever these are required. An outlay for Rs. 150.0 lakh has been proposed to be incurred during the plan period.

Survey and documentation of Flora and Fauna in the catchment The existing boundary of the forest covering in the CAT Plan will be maintained with pillar, to prevent encroachment by the local inhabitants. In addition, a survey for flora and fauna will also

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-16

be carried out and recorded. An outlay of Rs. 50.0 lakh has been kept for this purpose.

Incentive to local communities for fire prevention The local community of the plan area will be provided with incentives in order to prevent the area from fire and outlay of Rs. 35.0 lakh has been kept for this purpose.

Incentive to local communities for protection of Wildlife Reward / incentive to the informers are required for proper protection of the forest area against poaching and illicit felling. It is proposed to strengthen the Wildlife efforts of forest guard in controlling offences by associating the locals. They can be rewarded and incentives be given by the forest department. It is necessary to make people aware about the biological, ecological hardships which the forests of the area in general are facing. Therefore, people should be encouraged by providing them reward/incentive for giving information about the offender/culprits. It is also ensured that informer's name should not be disclosed publicly or otherwise people will not dare to come forward on this issue. A provision of Rs. 35.0 lakh has kept for this purpose.

B. DEVELOPMENT MEASURES Wildlife Census It is proposed to carry out wildlife census every alternative year in key areas to assess the trends in population of growth of various species. The findings of the survey will help in assessment of various management measures and need for improvements, if any. An amount of Rs. 50.0 lakh has been earmarked for this purpose.

Capacity building of staff and community The implementing staff and communities will be imparted with training and exposure visit in order to build their capacity for effective management and improvement of wildlife and wildlife sanctuary. An outlay of Rs. 40.0 lakh is proposed to be earmarked for this purpose.

Support for communication Mobile connectivity will be provided to the staff to have communication for effective protection of flora and fauna. An amount of Rs. 10.0 lakh is proposed to be earmarked for this purpose.

Establishment of nursery with infrastructure An ideal nursery will be established with its infrastructure to provide healthy seedlings for distribution of plants in public. Rs. 30.0 lakh has been earmarked to establish this nursery.

Maintenance of plant in nursery The nursery will be maintained so as to provide sufficient planting stock in perpetuity for public distribution. An amount of Rs. 15.0 lakh has been kept for maintenance of nursery.

Soil and moisture conservation The tract is prone to soil erosion and in order to check and protect the area from further erosion, a provision for soil and moisture conservation interventions has been proposed. For this purpose an amount of Rs. 50.0 lakh has been earmarked.

Monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment study A study will be carried out for impact assessment, monitoring & evaluation and for this purpose an amount of Rs. 20.0 lakh has been earmarked.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-17

C. Eco-development activities Support for vermi compost development Vermi composting is one of the alternative sources of income generation which is easy to adopt, home based and can bring fast income returns to the local people in an ecofriendly manner. Forest department and horticulturist in Kinnaur district will be a potential buyer of all such compost for its vast network of Forest Nurseries. Woman organizations from the area can adopt these activities as a part time without compromising with their day to day work. An outlay of Rs. 50.0 lakh can be earmarked for this purpose.

Support for introduction of LPG for poor house holds In order to release pressure on existing forests to meet the demand of fuel in and around the project area. A provision for introduction/ supply of LPG to the poor households has been made. An outlay of Rs. 35.0 lakh has been kept under this component

Socio-economic survey A survey will be conducted in the study area to assess and study the socio-economic conditions. Funds to the tune of Rs. 30.0 lakh have been earmarked for conducting the socio-economic survey.

BUDGET A total provision of Rs. 600.0 lakh has been estimated for implementation of various measures for Wildlife improvement and development. The details are given in Table-2.9.

TABLE- 2.9: Details of cost required for wildlife improvement and development

S. No. Activity Cost (Rs. Lakh) 1. Intensive Management of Wildlife 150.0 2. Survey of flora and fauna in the catchment area 50.0 3. Incentives to local communities for fire prevention 35.0 4. Incentives to local communities for wildlife protection 35.0 5. Wildlife Census 50.0 6. Capacity Building of staff and community 40.0 7. Support for communication 10.0 8. Establishment of nursery with infrastructure 30.0 9. Maintenance of nursery 15.0 10. Soil and moisture conservation 50.0 11. Monitoring, evaluation & impact assessment study 20.0 12. Support for vermin-compost development 50.0 13. Support for introduction of LPG for poor household 35.0 14. Socio-economic survey 30.0 Total 600.0 Micro planning listed above for forest and wildlife areas for the above development measures will be undertaken by the HP Forest Department during implementation. The EMP consultant was provided these figures during informal discussions regarding indicative costs in order to retain flexibility during implementation.

2.11. SILT OBSERVATORIES It is recommended that in areas categorized under very high erosion categories, major streams and river Satluj be monitored. Monitoring budget is comparable with entire cost of

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-18

treatment measures and not development measures alone. Silt observation is an integral part of treatment plan. Simple silt load/ yield analysis at periodic intervals provide the indication of effectiveness of treatment. SOP’s (Silt Observation Posts) will be established as part of the Integrated CAT Plan for observation of silt, monitoring results of which would be shared.

In addition, regular progress monitoring of each intervention / activity of CAT plan is an integral part of plan. Survival assessment of biological measures and verification of engineering measures shall be done by the implementing agency and results published and shared.

The monitoring shall cover silt content being carried in the river water. A provision of Rs. 30.0 lakh has been earmarked for this purpose.

2.12. BASIN LEVEL CAT PLAN The Himachal Pradesh Forest Department has awarded consultancy services for preparation of a Basin Level CAT Plan in which various project developers in the basin will contribute. It is proposed to contribute Rs. 100.0 lakh as contribution towards Basin Level CAT Plan including consultancy charges.

2.13. TRAINING OF FOREST STAFF A provision of Rs.120.0 lakh has been earmarked for training of staff and sensitization of local communities.

2.14. PROVISION OF ENERGY SAVING DEVICES A provision of Rs. 80.0 lakh has been earmarked for provision of energy saving devices to local communities.

2.15. FOREST PROTECTION MEASURES A provision of Rs. 418 lakh has been earmarked for forest protection measures in view of congregations of large labour population and outsiders in the project area and its surroundings during project construction phase.

The break-up is given as below:

• Anti-poaching measures : Rs. 121.3 lakh • Provision of free fuel wood to : Rs. 296.7 lakh labour and technical population

During construction phase in and around the main construction areas, i.e. the barrage site, power house site, etc. where construction workers congregate, some disturbance to the wildlife population may occur. Therefore, marginal impacts may be on wild life due to various construction activities. In view of this it is recommended that 3 check posts be developed. The location of these check posts could be:

• Upstream of barrage site • Downstream of power house site • Labour camp

Each check post shall have 3 guards to ensure that poaching does not take place in the area. The guards will be supervised by a Deputy Range Officer. It is also recommended that the staff manning these check posts have adequate communication equipment and other facilities. Apart from inter-linking of check posts, communication link needs to be extended to Divisional Forest Office and the local police station also.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-19

a) Salary Guards (9 nos.) @ Rs.10,000 per month Rs. 1,080,000 One range officer @ Rs.20,000 per month Rs. 240,000 Total cost for one year Rs. 1,320,000

Cost for 6 years Rs. 101.8 Lakh (Assuming 10% increase per year)

b) Construction of check posts, Rs. 19.5 Lakh Provision of arm and ammunition, communication system, etc. (Rs. 650,000 * 3) Total Cost Rs.121.3 Lakh Provision of Free Fuel It is recommended that, during the construction phase of hydroelectric projects, the project authorities have to make proper/ adequate arrangements for meeting the demand of fuel supply to the laborers/ workmen engaged through the contractors so that illegal felling of tress does not take place in the nearby forest area situated around the project as these projects are normally located in the far-flung remote areas to the forests. The basic aim and objectives behind this measure are to:

• control the illegal felling of trees • make a sound and eco-friendly project by providing proper fuel arrangements to the

laborers/ workmen • make the project responsible for catering to the demand of fuel for laborers / workmen • maintain the forest cover and environment of the region, where project is being located.

It is recommended to: - Make a clause mandatory in the contract of every contractor involved in project construction

to provide supply of fuel to their laborers, so that trees are not cut for meeting their fuel demands.

- Establish LPG godown within the project area for providing LPG cylinder to run community kitchens.

- Establish kerosene oil depot near project area with the help of state government to ensure proper supply of kerosene oil.

The project proponents in association with the state government should make necessary arrangements for distribution of kerosene oil and LPG. These fuels would be supplied at subsidized rates to the local/contract laborers for which provision should be kept in the cost estimate. The total cost required for provisions of fuel works out to Rs. 296.7 lakh. The details are given in Tables 2.10 to 2.12. The cost required for provision of free fuel to labour population is included in the overall cost of Catchment Area Treatment Plan.

TABLE-2.10: Cost estimate for LPG distribution

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-20

Year No. of Employees

Annual requirement @1cylinder per family per month (No. of cylinders)

Total Cost @Rs. 400/cylinder (Rs. million) including 10% escalation per year

I 200 2,400 0.96 II 200 2,400 1.06 III 200 2,400 1.16 IV 200 2,400 1.28 V 200 2,400 1.41 VI 200 2,400 1.55 Total 7.42

TABLE-2.11: Cost estimate for Kerosene distribution

Year No. of labors

Quantity @10 litre per labour per month (litre/yr)

Total Cost @ Rs. 20/litre (Rs. million) including 10% escalation per year

I 800 96,000 2.88 II 800 96,000 3.17 III 800 96,000 3.49 IV 800 96,000 3.84 V 800 96,000 4.22 VI 800 96,000 4.65 Total 22.25

TABLE-2.12: Cost estimate for provision of fuel

S. No. Fuel Cost (Rs. Lakh) 1. LPG for Technical staff 74.2 2. Kerosene for labour population 222.5 Total 296.7 2.16. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A provision of Rs. 1,030.0 lakh has been earmarked for development of local communities.

2.17. FORESTRY RESEARCH A provision of Rs. 600 lakh has been earmarked for forestry research.

2.18. RESEARCH WORK ON SNOW LEOPARD A provision of Rs. 100.0 lakh has been earmarked for snow leopard research.

2.19. CONSERVATION PLAN FOR NEOZA PINE A provision of Rs. 100.0 lakh has been earmarked for conservation Plan for Neoza Pine.

2.20. CONSERVATION PLAN FOR OAK A provision of Rs. 100.0 lakh has been earmarked for conservation Plan for Oak.

2.21. RESCUE CENTRE FOR WILDLIFE

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-21

A provision of Rs. 100.0 lakh has been earmarked for rescue centre for wildlife.

2.22. SNOW HARVESTING Harvesting snow water in cold desert regions is not merely a way to rehabilitate the land for crop growth, as it is also a way to bring cultural identity to a people in between the ancient times and the rapid pace of a global world.

The technique of harvesting snow by creating snow reservoirs in the winter months, the water from an upstream nallah is being diverted into a reservoir constructed under the natural shadow of a towering rock face, which would begin freezing with the onset of December. The reservoir, whose other three sides consist of crete walls and metal-wire mesh filled with boulders has a capacity to store more than 625 kl. of snow. This should thaw at a time when the farmers need the water for irrigation the most. A provision of Rs. 450.0 lakh has been earmarked for snow harvesting at various sites in the catchment area.

2.23. INFRASTURTURE REQUIRED FOR MONITORING OF CAT PLAN A provision of Rs. 67.5 lakh has been earmarked for infrastructure required for implementation and monitoring of CAT Plan. The details are given in Table-2.13.

TABLE-2.13: Cost estimate for infrastructure required for implementation and monitoring of CAT Plan

S. No. Fuel Cost (Rs. Lakh)

1. 3 Nos of Mahindra Xylo 30.0 2. 1 No. of Maruti Swift Desire 7.0 3. 1 No. of Ambassador Car 7.0 4 1 No. of Mobile Van (capacity 18-20 person) 22.0 5. Computer with printer, scanner and all other

accessories and 2 Nos of Digital Camera 1.5

Total 67.5 2.24. ECO-TOURISM As outlined in the guidelines for the preparation of CAT Plan issued by the Forest Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, a provision of 1% of the total CAT Plan cost has been earmarked for Eco-tourism. These shall include construction of trekking routes, small treatment plants for various sources of sewage and water pollution, installation of air pollution control devices in various guest houses, restaurants, greenbelt around at various locations, etc.

2.25. MONITORING AND EVALUATION As outlined in the guidelines for the preparation of CAT Plan issued by the Forest Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, a provision of 5% of the total CAT Plan cost has been earmarked for monitoring and Evaluation.

2.26. ECO-SERVICES TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES As outlined in the guidelines for the preparation of CAT Plan issued by the Forest Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, a provision of 10% of the total CAT Plan cost has been earmarked for Eco-services to local communities.

2.27. COST ESTIMATE FOR ENGINEERING AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-22

MEASURES, JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENT (JFM) AND SILT OBSERVATORIES The per ha cost for afforestation in degraded forest land and their maintenance and replenishment Afforestation/ gap plantation development is given in Table- 2.14.

TABLE – 2.14: Cost Model for Replenishment/ Gap Plantation (800 tree/ha) S. No. Particulars of Work Quantity Rate in Rs. Amount in Rs. Fencing

1 Survey & demarcation of Plantation area 1 Ha. 67.33 67.332 Preparation/ purchase of RCC fence posts 60 Nos. 200 per post 12,000.003 Carriage of RCC fence posts up to 2 m long

over distance 2 km 60 Nos. 907.34 per hundred 544.404 Preparation/digging of holes 20-30 cm dia & 50

cm. deep 60 Nos. 604.51 per hundred 362.705 Fixing of Wooden fence posts including

strutting 60 Nos. 477.34 per hundred 286.406

Carriage of Barbed wire over distance 2 km. 0.90 Quintal 54.50 /Quintal/km 98.10

7 Stretching & fixing of barbed wire in 4 stands. 720 Rmt 3.16 per m 2,275.208 Preparation of inspection path 60 cm width 250 m. 7.24 per m 1,810.009 Preparation of water retention

mounds/trenches. L.S. 2,000.0010 Interlacing of thorny bushes along the fence. 180 Rmt 2.74 per m 493.20

Total - Fencing cost 19,937.33Planting

1 Digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 300 Nos. 636.28 per hundred 1,908.842 Digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 500 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 1,591.103 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 300 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 546.934 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 500 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 636.105 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. uphill 300 Nos. 23.49 per hundred

per km 140.94

6 Carriage of plants in P/bags over distance 2 km. uphill

500 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 1,453.90

7 Planting of entire plant raised in P. bags 500 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 727.458 Planting of naked roots plants 300 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 367.989 Planting of grass tufts/Preparation of strips

including sowing in strips 100x30x5 cm for grass sowing along contour

500 Nos. 613.33 per hundred 3,066.65

Total - Planting cost 10,439.89Material

1 Cost of barbed wire 0.90 Quintal 7000 Per Quintal 6,300.00

Nursery cost of plants 1 Naked root plants 300 Nos. 6 per plant 1,800.002 Polyethylene bags plants 500 Nos. 8 per plant 4,000.00

Total - Cost of Plants 5,800.00 Grand Total 42,477.22 Or Say 42,500.00B) MAINTENANCE COST 1st year maintenance -30% mortality

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm. 90 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 286.392 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm. 150 Nos. 159.07 per hundred 238.603 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm. 90 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 164.074 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm. 150 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 190.83

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-23

S. No. Particulars of Work Quantity Rate in Rs. Amount in Rs. 5 Planting of P. bag plants. 150 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 218.236 Planting of naked root plants 90 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 110.397 Planting of grass tufts/preparation strips I/C

sowing in strips 100x35x5 cm for grass sowing 200 Strips 613.13 per hundred 1,226.268 Carriage P. bags plants distance 2 km. Uphill 150 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 218.089 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. Uphill 90 Nos. 23.49 per hundred 21.1410 Nursery cost of plants 240 Nos. 8 & 6 per plant 1,620.0011 Repair of fence 180 Rmt 1.16/Rmt 208.8012 Repair of inspection path L.S. 700.0013 Moisture conservation works L.S. 1,000.00

Total 6,202.79 Or say 6,200.002nd year maintenance -20% mortality

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm. 60 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 190.932 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm. 100 Nos. 159.07 per hundred 159.073 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm. 60 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 109.3864 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm. 100 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 127.225 Planting of P. bag plants. 192 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 279.346 Planting of naked root plants 60 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 73.607 Carriage P. bags plants distance 2 km. Uphill 150 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 218.088 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. Uphill 60 Nos. 23.49 per hundred 28.199 Nursery cost of plants 160 Nos. 8 & 6 per plant 1,080.0010 Repair of fence 180 Rmt 1.16/Rmt 208.8011 Repair of inspection path L.S. 500.0012 Moisture conservation works L.S. 800.00

Total 3,774.616 Or say 3,800.003rd year maintenance -10% mortality

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 95.472 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 159.07 per hundred 79.5353 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 54.694 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 63.615 Planting of P. bag plants. 50 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 72.746 Planting of naked root plants 30 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 36.797 Carriage P. bags plants distance 2 km. Uphill 50 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 72.698 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. Uphill 30 Nos. 23.49 per hundred 14.099 Nursery cost of plants 80 Nos. 8 & 6 per plant 540.0010 Repair of fence 200 Rmt 1.16/Rmt 232.0011 Repair of inspection path L.S. 400.0012 Moisture conservation works L.S. 800.00

Total 2,461.615 Or say 2,500.004th year maintenance -10% mortality

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 95.462 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 159.07 per hundred 79.5353 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 54.694 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 63.615 Planting of P. bag plants. 50 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 72.746 Planting of naked root plants 30 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 36.797 Carriage P. bags plants distance 2 km. Uphill 50 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 72.69

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-24

S. No. Particulars of Work Quantity Rate in Rs. Amount in Rs. 8 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. Uphill 30 Nos. 23.49 per hundred 14.099 Nursery cost of plants 80 Nos. 8 & 6 per plant 540.0010 Repair of fence 200 Rmt 1.16/Rmt 232.0011 Repair of inspection path L.S. 300.0012 Moisture conservation works L.S. 700.00

Total 2,261.605 Or say 2,300.005th year maintenance -10% mortality

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 318.22 per hundred 95.462 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 159.07 per hundred 79.5353 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm. 30 Nos. 182.31 per hundred 54.694 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm. 50 Nos. 127.22 per hundred 63.615 Planting of P. bag plants. 50 Nos. 145.49 per hundred 72.746 Planting of naked root plants 30 Nos. 122.66 per hundred 36.797 Carriage P. bags plants distance 2 km. Uphill 50 Nos. 145.39 per hundred 72.698 Carriage of naked roots plants over distance 2

km. Uphill 30 Nos. 23.49 per hundred 14.099 Nursery cost of plants 80 Nos. 8 & 6 per plant 540.0010 Repair of fence 200 rmt 1.16/rmt 232.0011 Repair of inspection path L.S. 300.0012 Moisture conservation works L.S. 700.00

Total 2,261.605 Or say 2,300.00ABSTRACT

1 New Plantation - 42,500.002 1st Year Maintenance - 6,200.003 2nd Year Maintenance - 3,800.004 3rd Year Maintenance - 2,500.005 4th Year Maintenance - 2,300.006 5th Year Maintenance - 2,300.00

GRAND TOTAL - 59,600.00

The total cost for CAT Plan is Rs. 604.4 million. The details of cost required for implementation of biological treatment measures and engineering treatment measures, wildlife improvement and development, joint forest department and silt observatories are given in Tables – 2.15 & 2.17. The details are given in Figure- 2.5.

TABLE- 2.15: Cost estimate for Catchment Area Treatment - Biological Measures S.

No. Item Rate (Rs.) Target

Physical Financial (Rs. lakh)

1. Replenishment Afforestation/ Gap plantation(800 plants/ha)

59,600/Ha 401 ha 239.00

2. Pasture Development 11,800/ha 2361 ha 278.603. Establishment of New Nurseries 200,000/no 10 20.00 Total 537.60

TABLE- 2.16: Cost estimate for Catchment Area Treatment - Engineering Measures

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-25

S. No.

Item Rate (Rs.) Unit Qty (No.)

Target Physical Financial (Rs.

Lakh) 1. Step drain 25,000 Rmt 19 285 71.252. Check dams 200,000 No. 25 25 50.00 Total 121.25

TABLE-2.17: Cost for implementation of CAT Plan

S. No. Activity Cost (Rs. Lakh) 1. Biological measures 537.60 2. Engineering measures 121.25 3. Joint Forest Management 260.00 4. Wildlife Management 600.00 5. Silt observatories 30.00 6. Basin level CAT Plan 100.00 7. Training of forest staff 120.00 8. Provision of energy saving devices 80.00 9. Forest protection measures 418.00 10. Community Development 1,030.00 11. Forestry Research 600.00 12. Research work on Snow Leopard 100.00 13. Conservation Plan for Neoza pine 100.00 14. Conservation Plan for Oak 100.00 15. Rescue Centre for wildlife 100.00 16. Snow harvesting 450.00 17. Infrastructure required for monitoring of CAT Plan 67.50 Sub-Total : A 4,814.35 18. Eco-tourism (1%) of A 48.144 19. Monitoring & Evaluation 240.72 20. Eco-services to local communities 481.44 Sub-Total : B 770.80 Total (A+B) :C 5,584.60 ESCALATION @ 10% Expenditure on Year 1(40%) of C – No escalation 2,233.86 Expenditure on Year 2(40%) of C – Escalation@ 10 % 2,457.24 Expenditure on Year 3 (20%) of C Escalation @ 21% 1,351.48 Total 6,042.59 say

Rs. 604.26 million 2.28. OTHER ISSUES As suggested by the HPPCB, the following aspects shall be covered as a part of the CAT plan: • Project proponent shall ensure providing display boards for all the works done under the

CAT Plan. • Project proponent shall ensure effective monitoring of the works done under CAT Plan. • Monitoring reports shall be shared with the Environment Department.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-26

Annexure – 2.1

CAT Plan Notification

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-27

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-28

Annexure – 2.2 PARTICIPATORY FOREST MANAGEMENT RULES - 2000

(Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Fts-II (B)15-10/87 Dated 23.8.2001 as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India) Notification

No. Fts. II (B) 15- 10/87 Dated 23.08.2001

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 80 read with section 81 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act No. XVI of 1927), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the following Regulations, namely:

1. Short title, application and commencement: (1) These Regulations may be called the Himachal Pradesh Participatory Forest

Management Regulations, 2001.

(2) They shall apply to such Government forests and such Government land including the common land, which shall be selected jointly for participatory forest management by the Society and the Department.

(3) They shall come into force from the date of publication in Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Definitions: In these Regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, -

a) “Act” means The Indian Forest Act, 1927, (Act No. 16 of 1927) as amended in its application to Himachal Pradesh;

b) "Conflict Resolution Group" means a group consisting of a representative of the concerned Gram Panchayat, a representative of the local non-government organizations or local community based organizations and the concerned Assistant Conservator of Forests;

c) "common land",“family”, “Gram Panchayat”, “Panch”, "Pradhan", “village” and “Ward” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 ( Act No. 4 of 1994);

d) "Department" means the Himachal Pradesh Forest Department;

e) “Divisional Forest Officer” means the forest officer in-charge of a territorial or wildlife forest division of the Department;

f) “Executive Committee” means executive body of the Society;

g) “Forest Officer” means a Forest Officer as defined under sub- section (2) of section 2 of the Act;

h) “General House” means General House of the Society;

i) “Government” means Government of Himachal Pradesh;

j) "Grazier group” means a group of persons, whether resident members or migratory graziers, who are dependent on the grazing resource in the selected area for meeting their livelihood needs;

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-29

k) “micro- plan”, means a holistic forest management and development plan of the area selected for participatory management;

l) "Participatory forest management" means management of Government forest and Government land including common land managed jointly by the Society and by the Department;

m) “Selected area” means any Government forest and Government land including common land selected under regulation 3 of these Regulations;

n) "Self help group" means any organized group of persons, who collectively by mutual help are able to enhance their economic status through resource based activities;

o) “Site specific plan” means a sub component of the micro-plan which is a technically appropriate plan for the site;

p) " Society” means village forest development society registered under section 3 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (Act No. 21 of 1860) for participatory forest management;

q) “Sustainable forest management” means management which is economically viable, environmentally benign and socially beneficial, and which balances present and future needs; and

r) "User group" means a group of persons dependent upon a common natural resource for sustaining its livelihood needs.

3. Intent of participatory forest management: a) On an application made to the Divisional Forest Officer signed by at least 50 percent of

the voters of a Gram Panchayat Ward, any Government forest and Government land including common land may be brought under participatory forest management. The land so identified shall be known as selected area.

b) In accordance with the wider objectives and plans of Government for sustainable forest management, the selected area shall be managed jointly by the Society and the Department on the terms and conditions of an agreement to be entered between the Society and the Department.

4. Village forest development society: a) There shall be a Society for a Gram Panchayat Ward. However, where the Ward is not

compact and the hamlets within it do not have common forests, common grazing lands, common rights and concessions more than one Society may be formed for each cluster of hamlets. The Society shall be registered under section 3 of the Societies’ Registration Act, 1860. (Act No. 21 of 1860).

b) All voters of a Gram Panchayat Ward shall be entitled to be enrolled as members of the Society.

5. Constitution of Executive Committee of the Society: The Executive Committee shall consist of -

(a) President to be elected by the General House;

(b) Vice President - do -

(c) Four Members - do -

(d) Treasurer to be nominated by the elected members from

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-30

amongst the members of the Society;

(e) Joint Secretary (woman) -do-

(f) Ward Panch ex-officio member;

(g) President - Mahila Mandal -do-

(h) Representative - Local women group -do-

(i) Three Members to be co-opted from the village level committees constituted by other departments of the Government, societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, (Act No. 21 of 1860) , user groups, self-help group and grazier group;

(j) Member- Secretary to be elected by the General House.

Provided that at least 7 members of the Executive Committee shall be from amongst the women. Joint Secretary shall assist the Member-Secretary.

6. Term of office of members of the Executive Committee: Elected members of the Executive Committee shall hold office for a period of two years from the date of assumption of office.

7. Powers of the Executive Committee: The Executive Committee shall exercise the powers of a “Forest Officer” as assigned by the Government under the Act.

8. Usufruct Sharing: The Society shall be entitled to the following benefits, namely :-

a) to collect the yield such as fallen twigs, branches, loppings, grass, fruits, flowers, seeds, leaf fodder and non timber forest products free of cost;

b) To the sale proceeds of all intermediate harvest, subject to protection of forest and plantations for at least 3 years from the date of agreement;

c) To organize and promote vocational activities related to forest produce and land; and other activities such as promotion of self help groups which may provide direct benefits, including micro-lending to women. None of the activities so promoted shall affect the legal status of the forest land;

d) Recorded rights over the forest shall not be affected by these benefits;

e) The Government shall charge no royalty on the forest produce within the selected area;

f) After 5 years, the Society may expand the area, on the basis of a fresh agreement deed, by inclusion of adjoining or nearby areas;

g) after 20 years from the date of agreement and, based on the principles of sustained forest management, 75 percent of the net sale proceeds from the selected area shall be put into the account of Society and the remaining 25 percent of the net sale proceeds shall go to the concerned Gram Panchayat; and

h) To utilize at least 40 percent of the net sale proceeds on forest regeneration activities including soil and water conservation.

i. Provided that for the purpose of usufruct sharing, family shall be one unit.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-31

9. Funds: Funds shall be generated by the Society through contributions by members and the sale of usufructs under these regulations. All funds, including those received from the Government, Gram Panchayats and non-government sources, shall be utilized through the micro-planning process.

10. Maintenance of Accounts: The sum received by the Society shall be deposited in the name of the concerned Society in a nationalized bank or scheduled bank or co-operative bank or post office and the account shall be operated under the signatures of the President, Treasurer and Member-Secretary of the Society.

11. Grant-in-Aid: The department shall release Grant-In- Aid to the Society under the Grant-In-Aid Rules subject to the availability of funds and satisfactory performance of functions by the Society.

12. Settlement of Dispute: In case of any dispute in relation to usufruct sharing in the Society, the Deputy Ranger concerned of the Department, shall take steps to reconcile the dispute. In case the dispute is not resolved, the Deputy Ranger shall refer the dispute, along with his report to the Range Officer concerned of the Department. The Range Officer, after hearing the parties, shall resolve the dispute within 30 days from the date of receipt of report of the Deputy Ranger.

13. Appeal: An appeal shall lie from the decision of the Range Officer to the Conflict Resolution Group to be filed within 30 days from the date of decision, who shall decide the same within 60 days from the date of filing of appeal, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the parties. The decision of the Conflict Resolution Group shall be final and binding on the parties. The Conflict Resolution Group shall send a copy of the decision to the Society and the Divisional Forest Officer concerned free of cost.

14. Preparation of micro-plans: (1) A micro-plan shall be prepared for the holistic forest management and development of

the selected area, by the Society. The Department shall help the Society in preparation of the micro-plan. A micro-plan shall be operative for a period of five years from the date of its approval by the Divisional Forest Officer and may be revised after three years. The micro-plan shall be passed in the general house with at least 60 percent majority of the members present.

(2) The Divisional Forest Officer may approve whole or part of the micro-plan.

15. Powers of the Government: Notwithstanding anything contained in these regulations, the Government shall have the powers to issue directions to the Society on participatory forest management processes, micro-planning, co-ordination, monitoring, grant -in -aid and implementation mechanisms.

BY ORDER

FC-cum-Secretary (Forests) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh

Endst. No. As above Dated Shimla-2 the 23.8.2001

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-32

Annexure – 2.2 Contd. GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

FOREST DEPARTMENT

NO. FFE-B(G)9-6/99 Dated Shimla-2, the, 30th October, 2002 NOTIFICATION

The Governor, HP is pleased to promulgate the following rules regulating payment of Grant-in Aid to the Village Forest Development Societies under the Participatory Forest Management

(PFM) schemes operative in Himachal Pradesh Short Title And Extent 1

(i) These Rules may be called “Rules Regulating the Grant-in-Aid to the village Forest Development Societies under the PFM schemes in Himachal Pradesh. (ii) These rules shall come into force immediately.

Definitions

2

In these Rules, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context.

(i) ‘Department’ means the Himachal Pradesh Forest Department. (ii) ‘Govt.’ mans the Government of Himachal Pradesh. (ii) ‘Revenue’ means the revenue administered by Himachal Pradesh Government. (iii) ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary to the Government of Himachal Pradesh in the

Himachal Pradesh Forest Department. (iv) ‘Conservator’ means the Conservator of Forests of the Circle concerned. (v) ‘DFO’ means the Divisional Forest Officer of the Division concerned. (vi) ‘PFM’ means Participatory Forest Management. (vii) ‘Society’ means Village Forest Development Society.

Purpose of the Grant-in-Aid

3

The purpose of Grant-in-aid is for the furtherance of objectives of PFM and its implementation through the Societies. The assistance in the shape of Grant-in-Aid would be meant for expenditure on plantation & pasture improvement, soil & water conservation, income generation activities, maintenance, fencing, protection etc., subject to the availability of funds, and based on such norms and for such other purposes, as may be decided by the Govt. from time to time. All Grant-in-aid disbursed will be funded by transparent norms, framed in advance, to govern not merely the unit of cost of different activities, but to also specify maximum costing for amounts for different activities and individual Societies would be entitled to.

Mode of payment.

4

The amount of Grant-in-aid shall be sanctioned and released quarterly by the DFO, keeping in view both, the norms and , within these, the requirement of the society, as well as available funds, on receipt of a written request from the Society, indicating the purpose for which it is required. Normally a self contained proposal containing the demand for the whole year shall be furnished by the Society by 30th April every year for scrutiny of the DFO, prior to sanction

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-33

Conditions for Sanction of Grant-in-Aid 5

The sanction of the Grant-in-aid shall be subject to following conditions: (i)That the DFO shall have right to check the accounts of the Society, to satisfy himself that the Grant-in-aid has been spent for the purpose for which it has been sanctioned. In case it is found that the Grant-in-aid has been mis-utilized, it will be open to the DFO to recover the aid from the Society, and to stop further payment. (ii)The assets acquired wholly or substantially out of Government grants would not, without the prior sanction of the Govt. be disposed of, encumbered or utilized for purposes other than those for which grants are sanctioned. The Society shall maintain a register in the form (as in in respect of the permanent and semi-permanent assets acquired wholly or mainly out of govt. grant. This register should be maintained by the Society separately in respect of each sanctioning authority to whom a copy thereof will be furnished annually for permanent record. The assets would be taken to mean all immovable and movable property of capital nature where the value exceeds Rs. 10,000/- Library books and articles of furniture will not, however, be included in it.

Maintenance of Accounts and Submission of Utilization Certificates. 6

(i)The Society shall maintain its accounts and records and the same will be open to inspection by the nominee (s) so deputed by the government.

(ii)An un-audited utilization certificate will be furnished by the Society in respect of Grant-in-aid released to the Society during a particular year by 15th April of next year, as perform, to the sanctioning authority, who will furnish the same to the Accountant General HP. The account in respect of the Grant-in-aid released to the Society for PFM activities during a particular year, under various PFM schemes, will be furnished by the DFO to the Accountant General (Audit) Hp by the end of September of the next/ following year of sanction of Grant-in-aid. The PFM account of the Society will be audited by a qualified Accountant, or any other agency approved by the government, before, December next, in order to ensure proper utilization of the amount of the Grant-in-aid released by the department of the Society. Thereafter the Society will submit one copy of the audited utilization certificate in respect of each project activity to the DFO. The quarterly instalment in respect of the Grant-in-aid for a particular year will be released by the DFO on the basis of un-audited utilization certificate furnished by the Society.

Miscellaneous

7

In order to ascertain the utilization of funds released to Societies by DFOs under various microplan activities, the Conservators shall prescribed format to the Addl .PCCF.PFM. The expenditure on account of payment of Grant-in-aid is to be charged under Head 2406

Head of Account

8

Forestry & Wildlife (Plan (-01-Forestry-800 Other Expenditure-06-SOON & 06-SOOS-under those schemes as may be included under PFM.

By Order

Principal Secretary(Forests)

to the Government of HP.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 2-34

Annexure 2.3 WATERSHED DIAGRAM WITH VILLAGES LOCATION

KHAWANGI

TELANGI

PANGI

RARANG AKPA

JANGI LIPPANESANG

MOORANG

RISPA

RIBBA

PURBANI

POWARI

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

3-1

CHAPTER-3 FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT PLAN

3.1 Introduction HPPCL is constructing three projects in Satluj basin in district Kinnaur namely Integrated Kashang Hydroelectric Project (HEP), Shongtong-Karchham HEP and Tidong-II HEP (in future). The Fisheries Department, GoHP has developed an Integrated Fisheries Development Plan covering areas of the above referred three hydroelectric projects. A separate study has been commissioned by HPPCL to determine environment flow and HPPCL is committed to maintain the same, if it is higher than 15% downstream discharge. If it is lower than 15%, HPPCL shall maintain 15% discharge i.e. whichever is higher.

Based on the study, HPPCL will keep 10% of this total environmental flow through the fish pass. The strategy for the development of fisheries in Kinnaur district is described in the following sections. Figure 3.1 shows the pectoral view of hydro – technology.

Figure 3.1: Hydro-technology

3.1 Status of fisheries of the project area The commercial fisheries are non-existent in the project area. The primary productivity of river is very low hence it has poor fish occurrence. The nutrient and temperature levels are given in Table 5.58.

Table 5.58: Primary productivity of Satluj River

Parameters Site-1 Site-2 Site-3 Coordinates 31° 35’ 44” N

78° 17’ 54” E 31° 37’ 57” N 78° 25’ 54” E

31° 39’ 34” N 78° 26’ 42” E

Elevation 1982 2286 2300 Water temp (°C) 5 5.2 6.2 DO (mg/l) 10.2 10.2 10.0 pH 7.7 7.6 7.5

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 3-2

Free CO2 Nil Nil Nil Total Alkanity 44 28 28 Hardness 12 10 12 Nitrate 3.6 2.1 2.4 Phosphate ND ND ND TDS 36 36 40 Source: Directorate of Cold Water Fisheries Research (Indian Council for Agriculture research) Nainital, Uttrakhand (India)

Netting was done to ascertain the presence/ absence of fish fauna using cast net with 4 mm mesh size at all the stations. Repeated netting was done at least ten times, at each station to avoid the possibility of escape of fish, if present in the river. Meantime the water samples were also collected for the estimations of physicochemical parameters. The fish catch area has been shown in Figure 5.2.

Cast Net Specification

(a) Diameter (m):- 2.7 m (b) Mesh size (mm):

• Near center (mm):- 15 mm • Towards circumference (mm):- 4 mm

( c) Sinkers: Numbers: 110 • Weight of each sinker: 25 gm.

3.2 Strategy for Fisheries Development [A] Development of Fisheries The commercially important fish species, which are going to be mainly affected by the Hydroelectric Power Projects in the district, are:

1. Snow Trout - Schizothorax spp. 2. Exotic Trout - Salmo Trutta fario 3. Rainbow trout - Onchorhyaricus mykiss

Anticipated depletion of fish stock of desirable species has to be augmented. In cold waters, stocking of commercial species of fish is annual exercise to make these species available at desirable level. To achieve this objective, additional facilities to produce seed of trout are proposed to be created and the existing facility is to be renovated at Trout Fish Farm, Sangla. [B] Promoting Commercial Farming of Rainbow Trout Local people of the area especially women folk will be helped to set up their own commercial units. Ten such units are proposed to improve their economy and providing them with dependable avenues. Awareness camps will be organized for the targeted groups.

[C] Angling Tourism In order to boost Angling tourism, one Angling Lodge with full amenities shall be constructed near Sangla with a provision of Cook-cum-Chowkidar. It will help in the exploration of the tourist potential of the Valley.

[D] Marketing of Trout Fish An Aqua Shop shall be constructed at Reckong Peo with facilities of fish preservation and manpower so as to provide a common retail outlet to the fish produced till such time it becomes feasible to outsource the same.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 3-3

3.3 Infrastructure Proposed for Development of Fisheries in Kinnaur Valley Streams

3.3.1 Management Plan for Rainbow Trout The cost required for development of hatcheries shall be Rs. 303.0 lakh. The details are given in Table- 3.1.

TABLE- 3.1 Cost required for development of hatcheries for Rainbow Trout S. No. Items Total Cost

(Rs. lakh) 1. Repair and maintenance of water storage-cum-aeration tank at Sangla Fish

Farm 25.0

2 Expansion and remodeling of rearing space at Trout Farm, Sangla. 50.0 3 Setting up as well equipped Pathological Lab at Trout Farm, Sangla. 40.0 4 Assistance to fish growers on the construction of one unit consisting of two

raceway size 15 m X 2 m X 1.5 m each @ 50% of cost with a ceiling of Rs. 50,000/- and on first year inputs Rs. 30,000/- per unit.

8.0

5 Awareness camps to local people for farming of Rainbow Trout with in State as well as outside State (Stipend @ Rs. 100/- per trainee in addition to and fro bus fare) and contingent expenditure.

5.0

6 Stocking of fish seed in open water bodies. The changed ecological condition necessitates regular stocking of brown trout and other trout species.

30.0

7 Provision of Pick - Up Van with Driver (on contract basis for five years) for the transportation of fish seed from Sangla Fish Farm to natural waters and also for the transport of fish and fish feed.

12.0

8 Construction of fully furnished Angler Lodge at Sangla including provision of angling amenities.

40.0

9 Construction of Acqua Shop at Reckong Peo for sale of Trout Fish for marketing with a provision of Refrigerator, Electronic Weighing Machine, packing material for Trout Fish.

10.0

10 Construction of two number residential Type-I quarters for the staff to be engaged for sale of fish.

25.0

11 Cost of land to be acquired for Acqua Shop and Type-I quarters. 5.0 12 Provision of Solar Yard Lights and Geyser at Sangla Farm. 5.0 13 Total 275.0 14 Additional Departmental Charges @ 10% say Rs. 28.00 28.0 15 Grand Total 303.0 3.3.2 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SNOW TROUT It has been reported that the indigenous fish species, Schiozothorax richardsonii, which is commonly known as ‘Snow trout’ are able to reach lower reach of the project area of Shongtong – Karchham HEP, Himachal Pradesh. However, the Schizothorax richardsonii, in addition to other species of the ‘snow trout’ are very common in the downstream stretch of the Satluj River. Thus, the construction of the project may affect the prospects of the development of snow trout fisheries in the river.

A snow trout hatchery shall be constructed downstream to the project with technical assistance from the Department of Fisheries, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh. The assistance of Institute of Coldwater Fisheries department of Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), Bhimtal, Uttarakhand shall also be sought for constructing rearing hatchery of snow trout. Juveniles of snow trout shall be collected from natural flowing waters which shall be stocked and reared in the built hatchery.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 3-4

The stocking program shall comprise of the following:

• Acclimatization stocking (a new fish species is introduced in a water course), • Supplementary stocking (a species already living in a water body), • Transfer stocking (transportation of mature fish from one water body to another), • Repetitive stocking (species which do not propagate in natural conditions). To carry out the stocking program on annual basis, suitable aquaculture facilities have to be created to meet the requirements of fingerlings. The proposed facilities have to meet the requirements of fingerlings of the Trout. The proposed aquaculture facilities have to be in flow through system facility for Trout species.

Commercial fishing is not in vogue in the project area. The barrage envisaged as a part of the proposed project will act as a barrier to the free movement of fish species. Since, Snow trout is categorised as vulnerable species amongst the threatened fishes of India, scientific management of the existing stock needs be adopted. It is proposed to implement supplementary stocking programs for the project area.

In addition to reservoir area, it is proposed to stock river Satluj on the upstream and downstream side of the barrage site. The rate of stocking is proposed as 100 fingerlings of about 30 mm size per km. For reservoir area, the rate of stocking could be 200 fingerlings of about 30 mm size per Ha. The stocking shall be done annually by the Fisheries department, GoHP. To achieve this objective, facilities to produce seed of trout shall be developed at Sangla. The cost required for developing of hatcheries shall be Rs. 51 lakh. The dimension of the hatching nurseries and rearing unit and their approximate cost is given in Table-3.2.

TABLE - 3.2: Cost required for development of hatcheries for Snow Trout Farm Component Area (m) Number Rate of flow

(lpm) Cost (Rs. lakh)

Hatchery building 15x 6 x 5 1 - 6.0 Hatching trough each with 4 trays each 2.0x0.5x 0.4 20 3.0-5.0 4.0 Nursery ponds (Cement lined) 3.0 x 0.75 x 0.5 9 25-50 6.0 Rearing tanks (cement lined) 10.0x 1.5 x 1.0 9 75-100 9.0 Stock raceways (cement lined) 30.0 x 6.0x 1.5 2 150-200 6.0 Storage – cum – Silting tank 4.0 x 4.0 1 - 4.0 Office store & laboratory room 8.0 x 6.0 3 - 12.0 Watchmen hut 4. 4.0 1 - 4.0 Other items like Dragnet, wide mouth earthen pots miniature happa bucket bamboo patches etc.

Lumpsum 2.0

Total 51.0 The cost for fisheries development shall be borne by the HPPCL and it shall be shared amongst all the three hydro-electric projects of HPPCL as given in Table-3.3.

TABLE-3.3: Cost to be shared by three hydro-electric projects of HPPCL for fisheries development

S. No.

Name of Hydro-Power Project of HPPCL

Share in Total Cost for rainbow trout hatcheries (Rs lakh)

Share in Total Cost for snow trout hatcheries (Rs lakh)

Share in Total Cost (Rs lakh)

1. Integrated Kashang (243 MW) HEP

105.0 - 105.0

2 Shongtong-Karchham (450 MW) HEP

175.0 51.0 226.0

3 Tidong-II (60 MW) HEP 23.0 - 23.0 Total 354.0 51.0 354.0

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 3-5

The total project cost shall be released by HPPCL in annual installments from each of its project as given Table-3.4.

TABLE-3.4: Installments to be released by HPPCL for three hydro-electric projects for fisheries development

S. No. Name of HEP and installment/amount Share in Total Cost (Rs. lakh) 1. Integrated Kashang (243 MW) HEP 105.0 A Total Installments Five B Amount of each installment 21.0 2 Shongtong - Karchham (450 MW) HEP 226.0 A Total Installments Five B Amount of first four installments 180.0 C Amount of fifth installment 46.0 3 Tidong-II (60 MW) HEP 23.0 A Total Installments Five B Amount of first four installments 20.00 C Amount of fifth installment 3.00 Total 354.0

3.4 SEED STOCKING GOALS FROM SANGLA TROUT FARM: About 20,000 fry of about 30 mm size each of Rainbow Trout and Snow Trout shall be made available for stocking in various streams and rivers of district Kinnaur. Besides 50,000 fry of Rainbow Trout shall be provided for commercial farming by local especially women folk.

3.5 DURATION Construction phase of the fish development project shall be completed in a period of five years starting from the date of release of first installment. Further installments will be released by the HPPCL on utilization of at least 80% of the first installment of the first project.

3.6. CONSTRUCTION AGENCY The work shall be got executed by SIDC or any other government agency.

3.7. APPRAISAL AND MONITORING A Steering Committee of the project would be constituted for the monitoring of the project as listed in Table-3.5.

TABLE-3.5: Steering Committee constituted for the monitoring of fisheries development S. No. Officer Position 1 Secretary (Fisheries) to the Government of H.P Chairman 2 Director-cum-Warden of Fisheries of H.P. Member 3 Representative of DC Kinnaur Member 4 Representative of HPPCL Member 5 Nominated representative of local public Member 6 Representative of Project Affected Families Member 7 Representative of Construction Agency Member 8 Assistant Director of Fisheries, Shimla Member Secretary

The main task of the Committee shall be:

• Review of the Progress of the project, • Consideration of the need for any mid-course change in the project component.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-1

CHAPTER-4 PUBLIC HEALTH DELIVERY SYSTEM

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The data on major disease in the study area collected from Primary Health Centre (PHC), district health officer and village Panchayat office. The primary data also collected by interview of the local people at the time of socio-economic survey. The prevalent diseases are acute respiratory infection, diahorea and eye infection. Malaria and typhoid are not reported in the study area. The initial health assessment reveals that there is no specific health hazard in the study area. It was also observed that there are no vector borne diseases are prevalent. A protective strategy is recommended to prevent incidence of water-borne and vector-borne diseases in the area. Water pollution problems are not likely as the study area is devoid of industries.

4.2 IMPACTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH

The construction of barrage may involve many diversified activities and require a large number of labors. The change in population density through immigrants/influx may cause new health problems in this region. People may carry different types of contagious diseases if any spread in locality. Influx of human work force may also bring stress on available drinking water sources and sanitary facilities. The additional domestic sewage generated may cause drinking water contamination resulting in spread of enteric diseases if not taken proper precautionary measures.

The proposed project would lead to increase in the water spread area with corresponding increase in shore line. This is expected to increase the incidence of malaria in project area and its surroundings. However, impacts on this account are not expected to be significant.

4.3 PUBLIC HEALTH DELIVERY SYSTEM

4.3.1 Control of malaria

The increase in water fringe area provides suitable habitats for the growth of vectors of various diseases and they are likely to increase the incidence of water-related diseases. Malaria is the water related major vector-borne disease. Thus, malaria control measures which aim at destroying the habitat and interrupting the life cycle by mechanical or biological or chemical means need to be implemented. Various Primary Health Centres in the nearby villages and Hospital at Rekong Peo and Shimla can coordinate the anti-malarial operations in association with the project authorities. The suggested measures are given in following paragraphs:

o The site selected for habitation of workers should not be in the path of natural drainage.

o Adequate drainage system to dispose storm water drainage from the labour colonies should be provided.

o Adequate vaccination and immunization facilities should be provided for workers at the construction site.

o The labour camps and resettlement sites should be at least 2 km away from a main water body or quarry areas.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-2

4.3.2 Development of medical facilities A population of about 3,200 is likely to congregate during the construction phase. The labour population will be concentrated at two or three sites. It is proposed to develop a hospital with 50 beds indoor patients and 3 doctor (General Practitioner) on the left bank of river Satluj. On right bank, there is already a district level hospital at Rekong Peo, which at present is under operation. It is recommended that the hospital should be developed during project construction phase itself, so that it can serve the labour population migrating in the area as well as the local population.

The details of manpower, infrastructure requirement for hospital on the left bank are given as below.

Manpower Doctor : 3 Qualification : M.B.B.S./ M.D

2 doctors can be employed in the dispensary and will reside in the staff quarters adjacent to the dispensary. The para-medical staff required for assistance to these doctors is given in Table - 4.1.

TABLE - 4.1 Details of Para-medical staff for Dispensary Para medical staff Number Auxiliary Nurse 6 Male Multipurpose Health worker 6 Attendants 6 Driver 8 Infrastructure

A building shall be constructed for the hospital. The building would have place for the following: - Three rooms for doctors, - Five room for staff, - Three rooms for stores, - Two general ward to accommodate 50 beds, - One minor operation theater/ dressing room, - One garage with space for eight vehicles, Residential accommodation is to be provided to the essential staff in the campus.

Proposed Health Facilities at Construction sites and labour camp It is possible that during the construction work, the technical staffs operating different equipment are not only exposed to the physical strain of work but also to the physical effects of the environment in which they are working. The workers and other technical staff may come up with common manifestations such as insect bites, fever, diarrhea, work exhaustion and other diseases. In addition they may invariably come up with injuries caused by accidents at work site. Under all circumstances, workers need immediate medical care.

A first-aid post is to be provided at each of the major construction sites, so that workers are immediately attended to in case of an injury or accident.

This first-aid post will have at least the following facilities: - First aid box with essential medicines including ORS packets, - First aid appliances-splints and dressing materials, - Stretcher, wheel chair, etc.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-3

4.3.3 HIV/AIDS PREVENTIONS AND MANAGEMENT Health Extension Activities

Following actions could be initiated for community health outreach programs to emphasize long-term improvements in region’s health status:

Augment existing government and NGO health programs. Priority on health education for workers and community residents through health

checkup camps. Vaccination programs will be included in such camps.

HIV/AIDS Risk Level The project may cause spread of HIV/AIDS in the project area due to following reasons:

Project requires long-term input of Labor from outside the area. Project requires significant numbers of employees who will be separated from their

families for long periods of time. Project involves the creation of temporary construction labour camp(s). Increases mobility of people in and out of the area (job seekers, formal and

informal service providers). Requires participation of the local population.

Potential Management Interventions for HIV/AIDS Following are the proposed management interventions to prevent HIV transmission and to manage its impact:

Specific HIV prevention activities: Social customs restrict or prevent intermixing of immigrants with natives. This is

established in other ongoing projects. HIV/STD/AIDS awareness in Information, Education and Communication (IEC)

activities. Peer education programs within the workforce. Condoms provision at medical camps. Training of health personnel, social marketing of condoms, technical and material

support to STD clinics, etc. Periodic health and safety trainings to workers.

Specific HIV/AIDS management & mitigation activities:

• Voluntary counseling and testing for health awareness, free condoms distribution and screening for sexually transmitted diseases.

• Treatment of opportunistic infections. • Recreation provision. • Remittance provision. • Labor transport.

There will be meaningful consultations with local communities so that management measures are culturally appropriate locally, and will have community support. The HIV/AIDS/STD management plans would be compatible and integrated with local, and state initiatives, and be implemented in consultation with State AIDS Control Society (SACS).

To effectively address the HIV/AIDS issues and the associated risks, the contractors will associate with the SACS fully and without any failure or excuse. HPPCL will insist that the

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-4

contractors implement all advice from the SACS. In addition, the contractors will be obliged to implement regular and periodic awareness campaign on HIV/AIDS, provide for all awareness materials and their dissemination, including erecting signage in prominent areas; and to provide and maintain condom vending machines in all work areas including construction camps, toilet booths, and work sites.

Cost estimates The costs estimated as follows are approximate and indicate the order of expenditure likely to accrue.

A. Expenditure on salaries Dispensary Post Number Monthly

Emoluments (Rs) Annual Expenditure (Rs)

Doctors 3 30,000 1080,000 Nurse 6 10,000 720,000 Male Multi-purpose 6 10,000 720,000 Attendants 6 5,000 360,000 Drivers 8 5,000 480,000 Total 33,60,000

First Aid Posts Health Assistants 2 10,000 240,000 Dressers 2 5,000 240,000 Total 480,000

Total Expenditure (A) Rs.3,840,000 B. Expenditure on Material and Supplies Dispensary Non-recurring

I 6 Vehicles Rs.3,000,000 II Furniture, etc. Rs. 500,000 III Hospital equipment Rs.2,000,000 IV Ambulance 2 No. and their maintenance for six years Rs.2,500,000 Total Rs.8,000,000 Recurring I Drugs and Medicine, Rs. 1,000,000/yr II Contingencies Rs. 500,000/yr III 2 First-Aid Posts at construction sites Rs. 120,000/yr Total Rs. 16,20,000/yr C. Infrastructure

Dispensary: Considering the number of rooms, staff quarters and open space etc., it is estimated that 25000 sq. feet of plot will be required for dispensary, out of which about 20,000 sq. feet will be the built-up land which includes staff quarters, etc. The construction cost for RCC structure will be Rs.500/sq. feet excluding land cost. The cost of construction of hospital will be Rs.10.0 million. The project proponents can purchase the land from the State Government. An amount of Rs.2.0 million can be earmarked for this purpose.

2 First Aid Posts: These are of temporary nature and will be constructed with asbestos sheets, bamboo, etc. It will cost @ Rs.100,000/First Aid Post. The total cost for constructing First Aid Posts will be of the order of Rs.0.2 million.

The total cost for developing the infrastructure will be (Rs.10.0 + Rs.2.0 + Rs.0.2 million) Rs. 12.2 million.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-5

4.4 BUDGET The total expenditure for implementation of various public health measures shall be about Rs.62.30 million. The details are given as below:

A.* Recurring Expenditure on salaries

Rs. 3,840,000/yr * Expenditure on materials & supplies Rs. 1,620,000/yr

Sub-Total Rs. 5,460,000/yr Total expenditure for 6 years (A) Rs. 42.10 million

(Considering 10% escalation per year period)

B* Non-Recurring Expenditure * Infrastructure (Construction of Dispensary & 2 First

aid posts) Rs. 12.2 million

* Expenditure on materials, supplies and equipment Rs. 8.0 million Total (B) Rs. 20.2 million Total A +B Rs. 62.3 million 4.5 DISPOSAL OF BIO-MEDICAL WASTE Hospitals and dispensaries use a variety of drugs including antibiotics, cyto-toxics, corrosive chemicals etc. a part of which is generated as a solid waste. With greater emphasis on disposables, the quantum of solid waste generated in a hospital is quite high. As per the Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 1998, the bio-medical waste has been classified into various categories outlined in Table - 4.2.

TABLE - 4.2: Categories of bio-medical waste Waste Category No. Waste category type Category No. 1 Human Anatonical Waste

Human tissues, organs, body parts Category No. 2 Animal Waste, Animal tissues, organs, body parts, carcasses, bleeding

parts, fluid, blood and experimental animals used in research, waste generated by veterinary hospitals, colleges, discharge from hospitals, animal houses

Category No. 3 Micro-biology and Biotechnology wastes, Wastes from laboratory cultures, stocks or specimens of micro-organisms, live or attenuated vaccines, human and animal cell culture used in research and infections agents from research and industrial laboratories, wastes from productionof biological, toxins, dishes and devices used for transfer of cultures

Category No. 4 Waste sharps Needles syringes, scalpels, blades, glass, etc. that may cause punctures and cuts, including both used and unused drugs

Category No. 5 Discarded medicines and cytotoxic drugs Wastes comprising of outdated, contaminated and discarded medicines

Category No. 6 Soil Waste Items contaminated with blood and body fluids including cotton, dressings, soiled plaster casts, lines bleedings other material contaminated with blood.

Category No. 7 Solid Waste Wastes generated from disposable items other than the waste sharps, such as tubings, catheters, intravenous sets, etc.

Category No. 8 Liquid waste generated from laboratory and washing, cleaning, housekeeping and disinfecting activities

Category No. 9 Incineration Ash Ash from incineration of any bio-medical waste

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-6

Category No. 10 Chemical Waste Chemicals used in production of biological, chemicals used in disinfection, as insecticides, etc.

Out of the categories listed in Table - 4.2, the following are likely to be generated in the dispensary proposed to be developed as a part of the project: Waste Category No. Waste category type Category No. 1 Human Anatomical Waste

Human tissues, organs, body parts Category No. 4 Waste sharps Needles syringes, scalpels, blades, glass, etc. that may

cause punctures and cuts, including both used and unused drugs Category No. 5 Discarded medicines and cytotoxic drugs Wastes comprising of

outdated, contaminated and discarded medicinesCategory No. 6 Soil Waste Items contaminated with blood and body fluids including

cotton, dressings, soiled plaster casts, and lines bleedings other material contaminated with blood.

Category No. 7 Solid Waste generated from disposable items other than the waste sharps, such as tubings, catheters, intravenous sets, etc.

Category No. 8 Liquid waste generated from laboratory and washing, cleaning, housekeeping and disinfecting activities

Category No. 9 Incineration Ash from incineration of any bio-medical waste

Category No. 10 Chemical Waste, Chemicals used in production of biological, chemicals used in disinfection, as insecticides, etc.

The bio-medical waste must be segregated in accordance to the guidelines laid under Schedule-I of Bio-medical Waste (Management and Handling) rules notified by Ministry of Environment and Forests. The proposed colour coding and container for disposal are given in Table - 4.3

TABLE- 4.3: Colour coding and type of container for disposal of Bio-medical waste Colour coding Type of container Waste category Yellow Plastic bag Category 1 and category 6 Red Disinfected container/

plastic bag Category 6 and category 7

Blue/white transparent

Plastic bag/ puncture proofcontainer

Category 4 and category 7

Black Plastic bag Category 5, category 9 and category 10 (solid)

The treatment measures recommended for various categories of waste is outlined in Table - 4.4.

TABLE - 4.4: Recommended treatment measures of various categories of waste Waste type Recommended treatment Category No. 1 – Human Anatomical Incineration Category No. 4 – Waste sharps Autoclaving along with waste of district hospital at

Rekong Peo Category No. 5 – Discarded medicines and lytotoxic drugs

Along with waste of district hospital of Rekong Peo at Secured landfill

Category No. 6 – Solid Waste Incineration

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karcham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 4-7

Waste type Recommended treatment Category No. 7 – Solid Waste Autoclaving along with waste of district hospital at

Rekong Peo Category No. 8 – Liquid waste To be covered separately under treatment of effluents

Category No. 9 – Incineration Ash Along with waste of district hospital of Rekong Peo at Secured landfill

Category No. 10 – Chemical waste Along with waste of district hospital of Rekong Peo at Secured landfill

It is proposed to treat the effluent generated from the dispensary in an Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) prior to its disposal. The ETP shall comprise of the following units:

• Screen • Grit chamber • Equalization tank • Neutralization tank • Clari-floculator • Activated carbon filter. • Ozonator • Guard pond

The cost required for various treatment units is included in the cost of development of dispensary.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 5-1

CHAPTER-5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN LABOUR CAMPS

5.1 INTRODUCTION The aggregation of large number of works and technical labour in the project area during the construction of phase is likely to put considerable stress on the ecosystem of the area. The labour camps are likely to be developed near Ralli and Karchham. The aim of the EMP is to minimize these stresses. It should be made mandatory for the contractor to provide adequate facilities at the labour camp which are described in the following sections. The labor camps are situated at fair distance from local population. It has also been observed that local population don’t mix with labor population and are often busy in their own daily activities. The past experiences with similar projects have shown that labor remains within the labor camp as the basic necessities/ amenities are provided to them in labor camp itself.

5.2 PROVISION OF HEATING The contractor can make a block of two large rooms in which about 30-40 workers can stay. Community toilets for each block can be constructed close by. During winter months, a central heating system can also be provided, to avoid cutting of trees to meet the fuel requirements to heat the water required for various uses by workers. 5.3 PROVISION OF WATER SUPPLY The water for drinking purpose is collected from the rivers or streams flowing upstream of the labour camps. The water is stored in tanks and supplied for use. The water quality in general is good and does not require any elaborate treatment. However, it is proposed to disinfect the water prior to distribution. The settlements/ labour camps shall be placed far from the drinking water sources. Septic tanks with soak pits for labor camps will be provided to protect water sources and nearby area from contamination. It can also be used as manure for plantations to be taken up either by the project or HP Forest Department. The inorganic/non-cyclable solid waste from the soak pits will be disposed in lined pits/landfill sites to be developed in dumping areas as guided by Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board (HPSPCB).

5.4 SANITATION AND SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES One community latrine can be provided per 20 persons. The sewage from the community latrines can be treated in oxidation ditch. Each labour camp can be provided with an Oxidation ditch. The treated effluent from oxidation ditch will be disposed off in nearest water body. However, efforts shall be made to ensure, that treated effluent is disposed only in these water bodies, which are not used for meeting domestic water requirements. The total construction time for the project is 6 years. At peak construction phase, there will be an increase in population by 3,200. It is proposed to construct a construction camp at Powari and Ralli villages To ensure that the sewage from the labour camp do not pollute the river water, it has been estimated that about 160 community latrines and a sewage treatment plant can be constructed. The total cost required will be Rs.6.20 million, details given in Table-5.1.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 5-2

TABLE- 5.1

Cost Estimate for sanitary facilities for labour camps S. No. Unit Rate (Rs./unit)

Number Total cost (Rs. million)

1 Community latrines 20,000 160 3.20 2 Sewage Treatment Plant - 3.0 Total 6.20

5.5 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FROM LABOUR CAMPS The labour colony will be located at barrage site, powerhouse and at adit sites. During construction phase, about 800 labour and 200 technical staff is likely to congregate. The increase in total population at site is expected to be of the order of 3,200. As per GoHP Hydro Power Policy 2007, 70% of employment will be given to Himachal residents. Thus, the peak labor population during peak period will be much less than 3,200 as it includes the family size of labors Table 5.2 provides year wise distribution of construction workers, starting from the year of commencement (say 2011-2012) of civil works at different working sites. The solid waste likely to be generated from labour camps shall be of the order of 0.64 tonnes /day. Adequate facilities for collection, conveyance and disposal of solid waste need to be developed. The inorganic and non-recyclable solid waste will be disposed at the designated landfill sites. A landfill can be designed in the way as given below, if we start from the bottom, bottom most layer is impervious clay, then second layer is impervious liner.

(Geo-membrane), Third layer is sand, after that well compacted solid waste is to be put over the sand, then again a layer of clay, finally a layer of soil. Some vegetation can be done at the top most layer. It will give a good aesthetic view of landfill. Various aspects of solid waste management include:

Table 5.2: Year wise distribution of construction workers, Year No. of workers at

Barrage, sedimentation chamber and Adit -1

No. of workers at Adit -2

No. of workers at Power House Complex

Total

2010-2011 40 2 38 80 2011-2012 288 64 288 650 2012-2013 400 200 400 1,000 2013-2014 400 200 400 1,000 2014-2015 400 200 400 1,000 2015-2016 400 200 400 1,000 2016-2017 400 200 400 1,000 2017 onwards 75 0 75 150

Refuse storage

In the proposed project, labour camps are proposed to be located at two or three location. In each of the labour colony, provisions shall be made to separately store the degradable and non-degradable solid waste.

A solid waste collection truck will be commissioned to collect the solid waste. Efforts will be made to separately collect the degradable and non-degradable solid waste. For this purpose workers will be provided with two separate dust bins to segregate the bio-degradable as well as non-biodegradable wastes. A sustained awareness programme will

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 5-3

be conducted to educate worker about the segregation of degradable and bio-degradable wastes.

Disposal

The solid waste would be treated in an incinerator. It has been the experience of HPPCL that HPSPCB does not accord “Consent to Establish” without the provisions for incinerator. Also, land is a limited resource in Himachal Pradesh. 66% of total geographical area is legally classified forests and controlled by HP Forests Department and it does not allow land for landfills if other alternatives are available even if they are little costly. At such high altitude and such a low temperature composting is not feasible around the year which requires high temperature and relative humidity. Therefore provision of incineration in addition to usual means has been made.

Solid and Medical waste Incinerator (proposed design) Capacity - 250 kg capacity per batch

Specifications - Heavy duty refractory lined (rated 1,550°C), cylindrical primary and secondary chamber, Primary chamber temperatures in excess of 1,000°C and secondary chamber temperatures of above 900°C with a 1.0 second gas retention time. Automatic control system provides preset burn times and shut off.

Cost – Rs. 0.35 million (approx.), However at the time of actual implementation incinerator as per most suitable technology for the specific site will be adopted which may be different from design suggested here.

The ashes and burnt material of incinerator though will be miniscule in quantity yet it will be kept in suitable lined pit near/in dumping area. The Incinerator will be run by HPPCL staff.

The ashes and burnt material of incinerator though will be miniscule in quantity yet it will be kept in suitable lined pit near/in dumping area. No separate clearance for this activity is required.

The total cost required for solid waste management is Rs.8.85 million. The details are given in Table - 5.3.

TABLE-5.3 Cost estimates for solid waste management S. No. Item Cost (Rs.

million) 1 One covered truck for conveyance of solid waste to incinerator site 1.00 2 Manpower cost for 4 persons @ Rs. 5,000/ month for 6 years including

10% escalation/year 1.85

3 Incinerator cost 3.50 4 Awareness programs 0.50

Total 8.85 5.6 PROVISION OF FREE FUEL It is recommended that, during the construction phase of hydroelectric projects, the project authorities have to make proper/ adequate arrangements for meeting the demand of fuel supply to the laborers/ workmen engaged through the contractors so that illegal felling of tress does not take place in the nearby forest area situated around the project as these projects are normally located in the far-flung remote areas to the forests. The basic aim and objectives behind this measure are to:

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 5-4

- control the illegal felling of trees, - make a sound and eco-friendly project by providing proper fuel arrangements to the

laborers/ workmen, - make the project responsible for catering to the demand of fuel for

laborers/workmen, - maintain the forest cover and environment of the region, where project is being

located. As a part of EMP, it is recommended to: - make a clause mandatory in the contract of every contractor involved in project

construction to provide supply of fuel to their laborers, so that trees are not cut for meeting their fuel demands.

- establish LPG godown within the project area for providing LPG cylinder to run community kitchens.

- establish kerosene oil depot near project area with the help of state government to ensure proper supply of kerosene oil.

- The contractor of HPPCL has to provide community kitchen along with heating arrangement for the labor force.

- The labor residing in labor camps will get their daily provisions at the labor camps itself or in the shops within the project colonies or in vicinity to be run by PAF’s. The increase in demand of provisions is likely to improve supplies which are limited and costly in these areas. The increased demand supplies will improve availability at affordable prices. Besides, PAF’s will be given shops in project colonies which add to supply position.

The project proponents in association with the state government should make necessary arrangements for distribution of kerosene oil and LPG. These fuels would be supplied at subsidized rates to the local/contract laborers for which provision should be kept in the cost estimate. The total cost required for provisions of fuel works out to Rs. 29.67 million. The details are given in Tables 5.4 to 5.6.

TABLE-5.4: Cost estimate for LPG distribution Year No. of

Employees Annual requirement @ 1 cylinder per family per month (No. of cylinders)

Total Cost @ Rs. 400/cylinder (Rs. million) including 10% escalation per year

I 200 2,400 0.96 II 200 2,400 1.06 III 200 2,400 1.16 IV 200 2,400 1.28 V 200 2,400 1.41 VI 200 2,400 1.55 Total 7.42

TABLE-5.5: Cost estimate for Kerosene distribution Year No. of

labors Quantity @10 litre per labour per month (litre/yr)

Total Cost @ Rs. 20/litre (Rs. million) including 10% escalation

I 800 96,000 2.88 II 800 96,000 3.17 III 800 96,000 3.49 IV 800 96,000 3.84 V 800 96,000 4.22 VI 800 96,000 4.65 Total 22.25

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 5-5

TABLE-5.6: Cost estimate for provision of fuel

S. No. Fuel Cost (Rs. million) LPG for Technical staff 7.42 Kerosene for labour population 22.25 Total 29.67

5.7 CONSTRUCTION OF POLICE POST Police post is proposed to set up for any eventual law and order situation within the project area due to presence of labor force. An amount of Rs. 20.9 million is earmarked for this purpose. The details are given in Table-5.7.

TABLE-5.7: Details of cost estimate required for construction of a check post S. No. Item Cost (Rs million) 1 Construction of building including staff quarter. 2.00 2 Salary for station Officer @ Rs. 25,000 per month for 6 years

including 10% escalation per year. 2.31

3 Construction of lower rank staff 4 members @ Rs. 15,000 per month for 6 years including 10% escalation per year.

5.55

4 Furniture. 0.20 5 Equipment, communication facilities, fire cross, etc. 5.00 6 Vehicles 3 @ Rs. 0.89 million per year. 2.40 7 O&M cost @ Rs. 50,000 per month for 6 years including 10%

escalation every year. 4.63

Total 20.09 5.8 BUDGET A total amount of Rs. 60.31 million has been earmarked for Implementation of various measures in labour camps. The details are given in Table-5.8.

TABLE-5.8: Cost required for implementation of various measures for environmental

management in labour camps

S. No. Activity Cost (Rs. million) 1 Sanitary facilities in labour camps. 6.20 2 Solid waste management. 4.35 3 Fuel supply in labour camps. 29.67 4 Construction and operation of a check post. 20.09 Total 60.31

5.9 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Various measures recommended in this chapter shall be included in the contract document of the contractor involved in construction activities. The implementation of these measures shall be monitored by the project proponents. However, the site for disposal of treated sewage from sewage treatment plant and solid waste shall be identified in consultation with district administration.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-1

CHAPTER-6 MUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN

6.1 INTRODUCTION A large quantity of muck is expected to be generated as a result of tunneling operations, construction of roads, etc. Muck generated from excavation of any project component is required to be disposed in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment. The muck disposal sites cause increased sedimentation in the rivers (though insignificant compared to natural sedimentation) and totally spoils the visual aesthetics of the area. It is of prime importance that these sites will have to be rehabilitated as soon as the disposal sites are full.

6.2 MUCK GENERATION A large quantity of muck is expected to be generated as a result of tunneling operations, construction of roads, etc. The total quantity of muck to be generated is about 2.55 (Million Meter Cube) Mm3. This includes 0.69 Mm3 of open excavation and 1.86 Mm3 of underground excavation. The component wise details of muck to be generated are given in Table-6.1 and details of consumptive use of muck is given in Table-6.2. The excess muck has to be dumped at six sites.

TABLE - 6.1: Component wise details of muck to be generated S. No

Name of component Qty. of Muck (Excavated) (m3) Open

Excavation Underground Excavation

Total

1 River diversion works 99,600 121,450 221,050 2 Diversion Barrage 431,175 - 431,175 3 Intake, Sedimentation

chambers & flushing 30,000 505,608 535,608

4 HRT & Construction Adits 10,810 943,313 954,123

5 Surge Shaft 32,400 97,557 129,957 6 Pressure Shaft & Valve

Chamber - 37,956 37,956

7 Power House Complex 21,000 134,808 155,808 8 TRT & outfall works 4,700 17,531 22,231 9 Road 60,000 - 60,000

Total 689,685 1,858,223 2,547,908

TABLE-6.2 Abstract of Consumptive Use of Muck S.

No. Components Qty. of Muck

Debris generated I/C 40% swelling factor (cum)

Quantity to be used as

backfill (m3)

Quantity to be used in construction or

protection works

1 River diversion works 309,470 61,984 77,368 2 Diversion Barrage 603,645 181,093 120,729 3 Intake, Sedimentation

chambers & flushing conduits

749,851 149,970 149,970

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-2

S. No.

Components Qty. of Muck Debris

generated I/C 40% swelling factor (cum)

Quantity to be used as

backfill (m3)

Quantity to be used in construction or

protection works

4 HRT & Construction Adits

1,335,772 - 534,309

5 Surge Shaft 181,940 - 72,776 Pressure Shaft & Valve

Chamber 53,138 - 21,255

6 Power House Complex 218,131 43,626 54,533 7 TRT & outfall works 31,123 4,668 7,781 8 Road 84,000 29,400 16,800 Total 3,567,070 47,0651 105,5521

Considering a swelling factor of 40%, the quantity of muck to be generated is 3.57 Mm3. About 0.47 Mm3 of muck shall be used as backfill, while 1.05 Mm3 of muck shall be used as a construction material/protection works. The balance, i.e. (3.56- 0.47-1.05) 2.04 Mm3 of muck shall be disposed at designated sites. The details of muck disposal sites and component wise muck disposal are given in Table-6.3. The details of the muck disposal sites are given in Figures 6.1 to 6.5.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-3

TABLE-6.3: Component-wise Details Planning for Muck Disposal S. No

Location Area (ha)

Capacity (Cum)

Distance Qty. of muck debris to be dumped from Addl. Capacity From

Barrage & Adit-I

From Adit II

From Adit - III & PH

1 Powari village 1.1383 349,000 2 km 5.00 km 9.00 km Intake sedimentation chambers & flushing conduits

330,000 19,000

2 Tangling village 3.5738 761,645 0.50 km 1.50 km 5.50 km River diversion works, Barrage intake, sedimentation chambers flushing conducts & upper half of HRT

700,000 61,645

3 Near Shongtong bridge

0.8928 237,300 1.50 km 1.00 km 5.00 km Upper half of HRT & Diversion barrage

225,000 12,300

4 Lal Dhank 1.2450 417,900 5.00 km 2.00 km 3.00 km Lower half of HRT & Diversion barrage

400,000 17,900

5 Ralli Det 0.8626 115,750 7.00 km 2.00 km 2.00 km P/H Complex & TRT 95,000 20,7506 Ralli Det (I),

Utilization of muck

0.50 25,750 7.00 km 2.00 km 2.00 km P/H Complex & TRTs 20,000 5,750

7 Ralli Det (II), Utilization of muck

1.80 111,600 7.00 km 2.00 km 2.00 km P/H Complex & TRT 96,000 15,600

8 P/H Site 0.5819 187,300 9.00 km 6.00 km 0.50 km Valve chamber outfall works Road & TRT

175,000 11,300

Total 10.0944 2,178,973 Total 2,041,000 137,973

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-4

Normally, muck is disposed in low-lying areas or depressions. Trees, if any, are cut before muck disposal, however, shrubs, grass or other types of undergrowth in the muck disposal at sites perish. The total area earmarked for muck disposal is 10.0944 ha.

Muck generated from excavation of any project component is required to be disposed in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment. In the hilly area, dumping is done after creating terraces thus usable terraces are developed. The overall idea is to enhance/maintain aesthetic view in the surrounding area of the project in post-construction period and avoid contamination of any land or water resource due to muck disposal.

Suitable retaining walls shall be constructed to develop terraces so as to support the muck on vertical slope and for optimum space utilization. Loose muck would be compacted layer wise. The muck disposal area will be developed in a series of terraces of boulder crate wall and masonry wall to protect the area/muck from flood water during monsoons. In-between the terraces, catch water drain will be provided.

The terraces of the muck disposal area will be ultimately covered with fertile soil and suitable plants will be planted adopting suitable bio-technological measures. The basic aim and objectives of the muck management plan are to:

• protect these areas from soil erosion; • develop these areas by afforestation; • develop them into parks, gardens etc; • utilize the maximum quantity of muck for development of infrastructure of the project; • develop these areas in harmony with the landscape of the project area. Various activities proposed as a part of the management plan are given as below: • Land acquisition for muck dumping sites; • Civil works (construction of retaining walls, boulder crate walls etc.); • Dumping of muck; • Leveling of the area, terracing and implementation of various engineering control measures e.g., boulder, crate wall, masonry wall, catch water drain. • Spreading of soil; • Application of fertilizers to facilitate vegetation growth over disposal sites; For stabilization of muck dumping areas following measures of engineering and biological measures have been proposed. Engineering Measures

• Wire crate wall; • Boulder crate wall; • R.C.C; • Catch water Drain The retaining walls provided the dumping area shall be designed to withstand severe earth quakes. For this, the site specific seismic studies for Shongtong Karchham HEP have been conducted by IIT Roorkee . The project structures including retaining walls will be designed to withstand most severe earthquake condition by adopting appropriate design parameters for this condition as per the report.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-5

Biological Measures

• Plantation of suitable tree species and soil binding species; • Plantation of ornamental plants; • Barbed wire fencing. Muck generally lacks nutrients and therefore, is difficult to re-vegetate. However, if no attempts to vegetate the slopes are made, the muck could slide lower down during rain and may eventually wash off the check dams also. Since, top soils are not available in large quantities in Himalayas; it may not be possible to apply a thin layer of soil over the muck. Bio-fertilizer technique developed by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) can be adopted in the proposed project. NHPC has successfully used this technique in Uri hydroelectric project. Similar approach can be utilized in the proposed project as well. In this process, the unused excavated material is piled and stacked with proper slopes at the designated muck disposal sites. The slopes are broken up by creating benches across them. This is done to provide stability to the slopes and also to provide ample space for planting of trees that would further help in holding and consolidating biotechnological approach. The traditional methods of afforestation of these areas would be supplemented with the use of fungus, i.e. Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrizae (VAM) and nitrogen fixing bacteria that form partnership with plant roots. These grow on plant roots and provide water and nutrition especially phosphorus to plants at faster rate. The seeding of plants would be inoculated with VAM and nitrogen fixing bacteria before planting. It has been found that plants inoculated with bio-fertilizers grow at faster rate especially in the medium where the soil/rock is devoid of nutrients. The afforestation with suitable plant species shall be done. About 1,000-1,200 trees/Ha shall be planted. Major species recommended for plantation are listed in Table-6.4.

TABLE-6.4: Species recommended for plantation over muck disposal site

Botanical Name Local Name Trees Populus ciliate Popular Pinus roxburghii Chir Cedrus deodara Deodar Salix acutifolia Bhains Shrubs Artemisia nilgarica Kunja Berbaris aristata Kingor Berberis lyceum Kingor Rosa moschata Jangli Gulab

6.3 BUDGET The total expenditure required for stabilization of muck disposal sites has been estimated to be of the order of Rs. 163.03 million. The details are given in Table-6.5.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-6

TABLE-6.5 Break-up of cost for stabilization of muck disposal sites S. No.

Items Cost (Rs. million)

1 Construction of check dams along river banks @ Rs. 18.36 million/km for a stretch of 8.0 km.

146.88

2 PCC cladding @ Rs. 200/m2 for 40,000 m2. 8.00 3 Preparation of muck disposal site@ Rs. 0.5 million/ha for 10.09 ha. 5.05 4 Provision of 15 cm soil layer over an area 10.09 ha @ Rs. 0.4

million/ha. 4.10

5 Development of vegetation (Refer Tables - 6.6 - 6.13) 0.68 Total 164.71

TABLE-6.6: Cost of Afforestation over muck disposal sites

S. No. Particular Area (Ha) Unit Rate (Rs/ha)

Amount (Rs.)

1 Cost of afforestation including Cost of material 8.2944 39,000 323,482 2 1st year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.6) 8,2944 6,160 51,094 3 2nd year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.7) 8,2944 5,490 45,536 4 3rd year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.8) 8,2944 4,370 36,247 5 4th year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.9) 8,2944 3,750 31,104 6 5th year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.10) 8,2944 2,880 23,888 7 6th year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.11) 8,2944 2,430 20,155 8 7th year Maintenance (Refer Table - 6.12) 8,2944 2,430 20,155

Total 551,661 Contingencies (5% of Total Cost) 27,583

Total 579,244 Departmental Charges @ 17.5% 101,368

Grand Total 680,611

TABLE-6.7: Maintenance cost for 1st year (25% mortality) S .No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total

Cost (Rs.) 1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 110 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 245.052 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 165 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 183.753 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 110 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 140.404 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 165Nos. 89.06 per hundred 146.965 Planting of polythene bags plants 175 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 178.246 Planting of Naked root plants 100 Nos. 85.87per hundred 85.877 Carriage of polythene bags plants over

a distance of 2 km up hills 175 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 356.25

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

100 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 16.45

9 Nursery cost of plants 275 Nos. 4.30 per plants 1,18210 Repair of fence 180RMT. 0.75 per Rmt 13611 Repair of inspection path L/S 323

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-7

S .No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

12 Repair of soil and moisture conservation works

L/S 455

Total: 3,448.97Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 1,477.88

Total:- 4,926.85Add Tribal increase 25% 1,231.71

Grand Tota Or Say:-

6,158.576,160.00

TABLE - 6.8: Maintenance cost for 2nd year (25% mortality) S. No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs) Total

Cost 1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 88 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 196.05 2 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 132 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 147.00 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 88 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 112.32 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 132 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 117.56 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 140 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 142.59 6 Planting of Naked root plants 100 Nos. 85.87per hundred 85.87 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants over

a distance of 2 km up hills 140 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 285.00

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

80 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 27.31

9 Nursery cost of plants 220 Nos. 4.30 per plants 1,063 10 Repair of fence 180 RMT. 0.75 per Rmt 135 11 Repair of inspection path L/S 323 12 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 455

Total 3,073.53 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 1,317.01 Total:- 4,930.54 Add Tribal increase 25% 1,097.63

Grand Total Or Say

5,488.17 5,490.00

TABLE - 6.9: Maintenance cost for 3rd year (25% mortality)

S. No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 147.03 2 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 110.25 3 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 84.24 4 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 88.17 5 Planting of polythene bags plants 105 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 106.94 6 Planting of Naked root plants 60 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 51.52 7 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km up hills 105 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 213.74

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-8

S. No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

60 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 19.73

9 Nursery cost of plants 165 Nos. 4.30 per plants 71010 Repair of fence 200 RMT. 0.75 per Rmt 14011 Repair of inspection path L/S 21512 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 215

Total 2,101.62 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 900.54

Total:- 3,002.16 Add Tribal increase 25% 750.54

Grand Total Or Say:-

3,752.713,750.00

TABLE-6.10: Maintenance cost for 4th year (25% mortality)

S. No.

Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

1 Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 147.032 Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 110.253 Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 66 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 84.244 Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 99 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 88.175 Planting of polythene bags plants 105 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 106.946 Planting of Naked root plants 60 Nos. 85.87per hundred 51.527 Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km up hills 105 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 213.74

8 Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

60 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 19.73

9 Nursery cost of plants 165 Nos. 4.30 per plants 71010 Repair of fence 200 Rmt. 0.75 per Rmt 14011 Repair of inspection path L/S 21512 Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 215

Total 2,101.62 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 900.54

Total 3,002.16 Add Tribal increase 25% 750.54

Grand Total Or Say

3,752.713,750.00

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-9

TABLE-6.11: Maintenance cost for 5th year (25% mortality) S.

No. Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost

(Rs.) 1. Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.022. Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.493. Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.164. Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.785. Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.306. Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.357. Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km up hills 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8. Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9. Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos. 4.30 per plants 47310. Repair of fence 200 RMT. 0.75 per Rmt 15011. Repair of inspection path L/S 21512. Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 215

Total: 1,611.72 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 690.62

Total:- 2,302.34 Add Tribal increase 25% 575.59

Grand Total Or Say:-

2,877.932,880.00

TABLE-6.12 Maintenance cost for 6th year (25% mortality)

S. No.

Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

1. Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.022. Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.493. Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.164. Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.785. Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.306. Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.357. Carriage of polythene bags plants

over a distance of 2 km up hills 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8. Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9. Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos. 4.30 per plants 47310. Repair of fence 150 Rmt. 0.75 per Rmt 11511. Repair of inspection path L/S 10812. Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 108

Total: 1,362.72

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-10

Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 583.93

Total:- 1,946.65 Add Tribal increase 25% 486.66

Grand Total Or Say

2433.312430.00

TABLE-6.13: Maintenance cost for 7th year (25% mortality)

S. No.

Activity No. Unit Rate (Rs.) Total Cost (Rs.)

1. Re-digging of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 222.78 per hundred 98.022. Re-digging of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 111.36 per hundred 73.493. Filling of pits 45x45x45 cm 44 Nos. 127.64 per hundred 56.164. Filling of pits 30x30x30 cm 66 Nos. 89.06 per hundred 57.785. Planting of polythene bags plants 70 Nos. 101.85 per hundred 72.306. Planting of Naked root plants 40 Nos. 85.87 per hundred 34.357. Carriage of polythene bags plants over

a distance of 2 km up hills 70 Nos. 101.78 per hundred 142.50

8. Carriage of Naked root plants over a distance of 2 km

40 Nos. 16.45 per hundred 24.12

9. Nursery cost of plants 110 Nos. 4.30 per plants 47310. Repair of fence 150 Rmt. 0.75 per Rmt 11511. Repair of inspection path L/S 10812. Repair of soil and moisture

conservation works L/S 108

Total: 1,362.72 Added 42.85% on account of increase on wage rate from January, 2008 583.93 Total:- 1,946.65 Add Tribal increase 25% 486.66

Grand Total Or Say

2,433.312,430.00

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-11

Photographs of adjoining projects in Sutluj Basin – Dumping Sites

Fig-6.1: Dumping site of Rampur HEP 412 MW on right Bank near powerhouse site

Fig-6.2: Dumping site of Rampur HEP 412 MW on right Bank near Rampur

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-12

Fig- 6.3: Dumping site of Karchham-Wangtoo HEP (1000 MW) on Right Bank near

Wangtoo

Fig- 6.4: Dumping site of Karchham - Wangtoo HEP 1000 MW on Right Bank near Tapri

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 6-13

Fig- 6.5 Proposed cross -section of retaining walls at dumping site

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 7-1

CHAPTER - 7 RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPING OF CONSTRUCTION SITES

7.1 INTRODUCTION The landscape and restoration plan targets towards overall improvement in the condition of the area. The landscape plan provides benefits to improve beautification and its utility. All the activities are aimed at restoring the areas where scars would be formed. The restoration would prevent soil erosion enhance forest cover and stabilize degraded areas.

7.2 RESTORATION PLAN FOR QUARRY SITE AND BORROW AREA A project of this magnitude would require significant amount of construction material. The details are given in Table-7.1.

TABLE-7.1 Detail of Construction Material Required S. No. Material Unit Quantity 1. Coarse aggregate lac m3 2.97 2. Fine aggregate lac m3 1.50 3. Cement MT 14,000 4. Structural steel MT 6,200 5. Reinforcement steel MT 20,323 6. High Tensile steel MT 12,824

The sand required for the project is proposed to be taken from Satluj river bank. An aggregate manufacturing equipment sand processing plant will be located at quarry site near village Powari, the site is away from habitation. The impervious material required for cofferdam will be met locally. The material for riprap is available on the river banks at site.

The cement will be transported from ACC Barmana and Ambuja cement factories. The steel transported from Jalandhar by road. The quarrying operations are semi-mechanized in nature. Normally, in a hilly terrain like Himachal Pradesh, quarrying is normally done by cutting a face of the hill. A permanent scar is likely to be left, once quarrying activities are over. With the passage of time, the rock from the exposed face of the quarry under the action of wind and other erosion forces, get slowly weathered and after some time, they become a potential source of landslide. Thus it is necessary to implement appropriate slope stabilization measures to prevent the possibility of soil erosion and landslides in the quarry sites.

Similarly, the proposed project would require significant amount of fine material, which can be met either by crushing the aggregates or by excavation from borrow areas. In the proposed project, large quantity of fines shall be required, which would entail excavation from borrow pits. Normally, such sites are left untreated after excavation of the construction material. The pit so created impedes the natural drainage, increases the potential for soil erosion and stores rain water and runoff. These pools of water can serve as habitats for proliferation of mosquitoes, which can lead to increased incidence of vector-borne diseases.

RESTORATION PLAN FOR QUARRY SITE AND BORROW AREA The following biological and engineering measures are suggested for the restoration of quarry site:

• Garland drains around quarry site to capture the runoff and divert the same to the nearest natural drain.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 7-2

• Construction of concrete guards check the soil erosion of the area. • The pit formed after excavation be filled with small rocks, sand and farmyard manure. • Grass slabs will be placed to stabilized and to check the surface runoff of water and loose

soil. Since the quarry site is in the submergence area thus, the River Bed Mining (RBM) material will replenish itself annually in monsoon season. Since no gangue or mine spoil will be generated (RBM has 100% utilization rate) therefore there is no need for disposal. The quarried material will be stacked at leveled dumping site. As per Muck Management Plan, excess capacity for dumping is available. Figure 1.1, gives the pectoral view of submergence area and Table 1.1, in Chapter 1, gives detail of trees required to be cut in submergence area, Table 7.2 gives details of availability of raw material for construction.

Table 7.2: Detail of availability of adequate quantities of raw material (Coarse/Fine aggregate) per year construction of SKHEP

Site No.

Name of Quarry Site Quantity (cubic meters)

1. 25 m D/S of Drift to Desanding chamber 24,241.00 2. 25 m U/S of Drift to Desanding chamber 17,622.75 3. At Barrage 8,891.25 4. At Barrage 39,337.50 5. Near Stone Crusher at Powari 30,137.25 6. U/S of Discharge site 9,975.00 7. U/S of Discharge site 17,672.00 8. Near Tangling Jhula 9,265.00

TOTAL 157,141.75 say (157,142.00)

Since all the sites are in river bed thus they will replenish themselves every year. So for the 5½ years of construction phase it will comes out to be = 157,142 x 5 ½ = 864279.625 cubic meters = 0.86 million cubic meters

In case the required material fell short of demand then HPPCL will use its already existing quarry of Kashang Project at Jangi.

The necessary NOCs/approval from the mining department and other approvals for use of quarry sites will be taken after acquisition of land.

At the present level of investigations a tentative provision of Rs.10.5 million can be earmarked for quarry and borrow slope stabilization. The details are given in Table-7.3.

TABLE-7.3: Cost estimate for restoration of borrow area S. No. Activities/purpose Cost (Rs. million) 1. Filling up the land with soil 1.00 2. Cost of green manure 0.40 3. Cost of sapling (10,000 saplings/ ha) @ Rs.5.00 per sapling 0.05 4. Cost of fertilizers and pesticides 0.40 5. Fencing with RCC pillars and barbed wire 0.30 6. Maintenance activities including cleaning of weeds @ Rs.50,000

for 5 years 0.25

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 7-3

S. No. Activities/purpose Cost (Rs. million) 7. Digging of pits 0.10 8. Construction of garland drain 2.0 9. Bench terracing 5.00 Total 10.50

7.3. LANDSCAPING AND RESTORATION PLAN Area for landscaping: The working areas of barrage site, power house complex colony area have been selected for beautification of the project area after construction is over.

The reservoir created due to the construction of barrage may be a local point of tourist attraction. This could be used for sport fishing, so there is a need to construction of benches for sitting, development of resting sheds and footpath. The beautification would be carried out by developing flowering beds for plantation ornamental plant and flower garden.

There would be sufficient open space in power house complex and colony area. Forested area in the power house complex would provide aesthetic view and add to natural seismic beauty. The beautification in the colony area would be carried out by development of flowering beds for plantation of ornamental plant, creepers, flower garden and a small park, construction of benches for sitting, resting sheds, walk way and fountain. A provision of Rs.5.0 million has been earmarked for landscaping and beautification of the area.

7.4 BUDGET A total provision of (10.50 + 5.00) Rs. 15.50 million, (has been earmarked) for restoration of quarry and borrow area, reclamation of construction sites, landscaping and beautification.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 8-1

CHAPTER-8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION

8.1 INTRODUCTION The widening and construction of approach roads to Project components will be done in a stretch of 10.44 km with a width of 5/7 meters of road well within the project area of 3 sq. km. This will help in smooth movement of traffic which will take care of increase in traffic due to project activity. Details of roads to be constructed and widened are provided in Table 8.1. Realignment or relocation of the nearby National Highway – No. 22 is not required for the project. This work has already taken up by the concerned agency as part of its own departmental program which covers the whole length of the National Highway including the portion falling in the project area, and the work is already started. As such, it is not to be done as part of project activity and is not addressed in project EMP.

8.2 IMPACTS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS The construction of roads can lead to the following impacts:

• The topography of the project area has steep to precipitous slope, which descends rapidly into narrow valleys. The conditions can give rise to erosion hazards due to net downhill movement of soil aggregates.

• Removal of trees on slopes and re-working of the slopes in the immediate vicinity of roads can encourage landslides, erosion gullies, etc. With the removal of vegetal cover, erosive action of water gets pronounced and accelerates the process of soil erosion and formation of deep gullies. Consequently, the hill faces are bared of soil vegetative cover and enormous quantities of soil and rock can move down the rivers, and in some cases, the road itself may get washed out.

• Construction of new roads increases the accessibility of a hitherto undisturbed areas resulting in greater human interferences and subsequent adverse impacts on the ecosystem.

• Increased air pollution during construction phase.

Table 8.1 Details of the approach roads along with widening of existing roads.

Description and Name of Road Length (Approx) in km Widening of existing HPPWD road to 5/7 m wide from Shongtong bridge to Powari junction village

4.44

Approach road 5/7 m wide from Ralli village road to top and bottom of surge shaft, proposed explosive magazine site, temporary staff quarters, site office, Adit to bottom of pressure shaft and pot head yard and approach road to Adit-3 from NH-22.

5.0

Approach road to quarry site at Powari 1.0

All the approach roads are away from local population thus their construction will not hinder their movement and will have very minimal impact.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 8-2

8.3 MANAGEMENT MEASURES The approach roads will have to be constructed as a part of the access to the construction site. In a hilly environment, construction of roads sometime disturbs the scenic beauty of the area. In addition, landslides are often triggered due to road construction because of the loosening of rocks by water trickling from various streams.

Steeply sloping banks are liable to landslides, which can largely be controlled by provision of suitable drainage. The basic principle is to intercept and divert as much water as possible, before it arrives at a point, where it becomes a nuisance. The other erosion hazard is that of surface erosion of the bank, which is best controlled by vegetation. However, in a steeply sloping terrain, difficulty lies in growing vegetation on steeply sloping banks. Engineering solutions such as surface drainage, sub-surface drainage, toe protection and rock bolting can be used. Landslides can be stabilized by several methods-engineering or bioengineering measures alone or a combination of these. The cost required for implementation of various measures has already been incorporated in the overall budget earmarked for construction of roads.

In hilly terrain, road construction often generates significant quantity of wastes (muck) due to the stripping of the rocks to make way for the roads. The stripped muck is generally cleared by dumping the material along the slopes. These dumped materials finally flow down to the valleys and ultimately finds its way to the river.

However, it is recommended to adopt a more systematic approach. The stripped material should be collected and dumped in the designated muck disposal area, which will have retaining wall to prevent the muck to flow down into the river. After disposal operation is complete at the dumpsite, the dump yard should be contoured and vegetated.

The various aspects to be considered while making the project roads are briefly described in the following paragraphs.

Construction

• Area for clearing and grubbing shall be kept minimum, subject to the technical requirements of the road. The clearing area shall be properly demarcated to save desirable trees and shrubs and to keep tree cutting to the minimum.

• Where erosion is likely to be a problem, clearing and grubbing operations shall be so scheduled and performed that grading operations and permanent erosion control of features can follow immediately thereafter, if the project conditions permit; otherwise temporary erosion control measures shall be provided between successive construction stages. Under no circumstances, however, should very large surface area of erodible earth material be exposed at any one time by clearing and grubbing.

• The method of balanced cut and fill formation shall be adopted to avoid large difference in cut and fill quantities.

• The cut slopes shall be suitably protected by breast walls, provision of flat stable slopes, construction of catch water and intercepting drains, treatment of slopes and unstable areas above and underneath the road, etc.

• Where rock blasting is involved, controlled blasting techniques shall be adopted to avoid over-shattering of hill faces.

• Excavated material should not be thrown haphazardly but dumped duly dressed up in a suitable form at appropriate places where it cannot get easily washed away by rain, and such spoil deposits may be duly trapped or provided with some vegetative cover.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 8-3

Drainage • Drainage of the water from hill slopes and road surface is very important. All artificial

drains shall be linked with the existing natural drainage system. • Surface drains shall have gentle slopes. Where falls in levels are to be negotiated,

check dams with silting basins shall be constructed and that soil is not eroded and carried away by high velocity flows.

• Location and alignment of culverts should also be so chosen as to avoid severe erosion at outlets and siltation at inlets.

Grassing and Planting • Tree felling for road construction/works should be kept bare minimum and strict control

must be exercised in consultation with the Forest department. Equivalent amount of new trees should be planted as integral part of the project within the available land and if necessary, separate additional land may be acquired for this purpose.

• Depending on the availability of land and other resources, afforestation of roadside land should be carried out to a sufficient distance on either side of the road.

Other measures • Watch will be sprayed regularly during construction phase of the roads to prevent

entrainment of dust. • Regular compaction of temporary roads.

8.4 BUDGET An amount of Rs. 3.12 million has been earmarked for implementation of measures to mitigate adverse impacts due to construction of roads. The details are given in Table -8.2.

TABLE-8.2: Details of expenditure for implementation of measures for management of Impacts due to construction of roads

S. No.

Item Cost (Rs. millions)

1. Clearing and grubbing @ Rs.0.05 million/km for 6 km 0.30 2. Provision of breast walls, construction of catch water and interceptor

drains @ Rs.0.30 million/km for 6 km1.80

3. Provision of drainage system along roads @ Rs.0.14 million/km for 6 km 0.60 4. Roadside plantation, Jute matting etc. @ Rs.0.07 million/km for 6 km 0.42 5. Provision of water for spray @ Rs. 200/tanker for 50 tankers per day for a

construction period of 200 days 2.00

6. Compaction of Kutcha roads 2.00 Total 7.12

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 9-1

CHAPTER-9 GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

9.1 INTRODUCTION The greenbelt development plan aims to overall improvement in the environmental conditions of the region. The plan with a five-fold objective addresses issues such as prevention of land degradation due to activities during construction phase; enhancing the forest cover for increasing the biodiversity of the region; providing aesthetic value to the project area and consequently inviting a proportionate tourist flux; enhancing the ecological equilibrium of the area; and to a large proportion in combating soil erosion. Although, the forest loss due to reservoir submergence, and other project appurtenances will be compensated as a part of compensatory afforestation. It is proposed to develop greenbelt around the periphery of various project appurtenances, selected stretches along reservoir periphery.

9.2 NEED FOR GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT PLAN The green belt on either side of the reservoir will reduce the sedimentation and ensure protection of the reservoir area from any other human activity that could result in the reservoir catchment damage. On moderately steep slopes tree species will be planted for the creation of green belt which are indigenous, economically important, soil binding in nature and an thrive well under high humidity and flood conditions. In addition greenbelt is recommended around permanent colony for the project.

9.3 SCHEME FOR GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT The scheme of plantation around the reservoir is given as follows:

i) The green belt will start from the immediate vicinity of the reservoir rim on both the banks; up to the tail of the reservoir moderately steep slopes are available for plantation.

ii) The width of the green belt will be around 40 m or as physiographic and land features allow. There would be at least 2-3 layers of plantation. The plantation will start along 1960 m contour level and would go up to 2,000 m contour level from the barrage axis up to the tail of the river.

iii) The row of tree species nearest the rim will constitute water loving species, preferably Alnus nitida, Salix spp., Populus spp. These species will thrive very well at these altitudes.

iv) Towards higher altitudes of the reservoir the rows around the reservoir may include Aesculus indica, Populus ciliata, in addition to Salix spp.

v) The middle rows of the green belt will comprise species like Juglans regia, Acer pictum, Celtis tetrandra.

vi) The outermost layer of the green belt will constitute of hardly tree species and shrub by mix to withstand any external influences/pressures of grazing, browsing by cattle and sheep, etc. The species best suited for this layer at lower altitudes are Prunus cornuta, Rhododendron aroboreum, Pinus wallichiana, Abies pindrow and towards higher reaches the outer layers will comprise Quercus dilatata, Acer caesium, Lyonia ovalifolia, Viburnum cotonifolium, Ulmus wallichiana and Aesculus indica.

vii) The green belt will be put under a protective regulatory framework to ensure that it is not degraded or disturbed. No ecologically disruptive activity will be allowed in this zone.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 9-2

9.4 BUDGET The plantations would be carried out on an approximate area of 40 Ha. This work would be completed in two years at an estimated cost of Rs.4.0 million at the rate of Rs.100,000/- per Ha which includes the cost of nursery creation, advance works, actual plantations and maintenance. The plantation for this purpose will be carried out by Forest department.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong - Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 10-1

CHAPTER-10 CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION

10.1 IMPACTS ON AIR QUALITY In a water resources project, air pollution occurs mainly during project construction phase. The major sources of air pollution during construction phase are:

• Fuel combustion in various construction equipment, e.g. crushers, drillers, rock bolters, diesel generating vehicles, etc.

• Fugitive emissions from crusher, • Impacts due to vehicular movement.

a) Pollution due to fuel combustion in various equipment The operation of various construction equipment requires of combustion of fuel. Normally, diesel is used in such equipment. The major pollutant, which gets emitted as a result of diesel combustion, is SO2. The SPM emissions are minimal due to low ash content. Based on past experience in similar projects, SPM and SO2 are not expected to increase significantly. Thus, in the proposed project, no significant impact on ambient air quality is expected as a result of operation of various construction equipment.

b) Emissions from various crushers The operation of the crusher during the construction phase is likely to generate fugitive emissions, which can move even up to 1 km in predominant wind direction. During construction phase, an aggregate manufacturing plant with crusher is likely to be commissioned near village Jurgi. During crushing operations, fugitive emissions comprising of the suspended particulate will be generated. There could be marginal impacts to settlements close to the sites at which crushers are commissioned. However, based on past experience, adverse impacts on this account are not anticipated. However, during finalizing the project layout, it should be ensured that the labour camps, colonies, etc. are located on the leeward side and outside the impact zone (about 1.5 to 2 km) of the crushers.

c) Impacts due to vehicular movement The traffic density in project area is high as its located adjacent to NH-22 and even at this high traffic density, the values recorded for ambient air quality monitoring during EIA study are less than 5 µg/m³. Thus, it has been assumed that due to project activity, even if the traffic density gets doubles, the corresponding values for ambient air quality are not likely to exceed 10 µg/m³, which is still at very lower level to the national permissible standard at 80 µg/m³ for applicable category. Table 11.2 gives the detail of Vehicles Movement during project cycle. The details of comparison between the changes in air quality due to increased traffic areas given in Table 10.1.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong - Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 10-2

Table 10.1: Impact on air and noise quality Parameters Baseline Data

as per EIA Change in air quality due to project activities (assumption)

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NOx (µg/m³) <5 10 80 Sox (µg/m³) <5 10 80 Noise (dB (A)) 36 (max.) 65 (day time) 75

Thus, the increase in traffic due to project activity will not have much impact on the air quality of the project area (i.e. 3 sq. km). Construction and widening of approach roads to project components will be done in a stretch of 10.44 km with a width of 5/7 meters within the project area of 3 sq km. The widening of these small roads will facilitate smooth movement of traffic between various components of the project during construction phase. 10.2 MITIGATION MEASURES

a) Control of Emissions Minor air quality impacts will be caused by emissions from construction vehicles, equipment and DG sets, and emissions from transportation traffic. Frequent truck trips will be required during the construction period for removal of excavated material and delivery of select concrete and other equipment and materials. The following measures are recommended to control air pollution:

• The contractor will be responsible for maintaining properly functioning construction equipment to minimize exhaust.

• Construction equipment and vehicles will be turned off when not used for extended periods of time.

• Unnecessary idling of construction vehicles to be prohibited.

• Effective traffic management to be undertaken to avoid significant delays in and around the project area.

• Road damage caused by sub-project activities will be promptly attended to with proper road repair and maintenance work. An amount of Rs. 2.0 million is earmarked for this purpose.

• Proper water sprinkling (round the clock) will be done to minimize the air pollution due to dust emission.

• Only pollution under check/norm compliant vehicles of the project will be allowed to be use in the project area. Checks for smoke emission due to vehicular movement of the project vehicles, as a part of monitoring program will be done. Environment Monitoring Program has been updated to this extent.

b) Air Pollution control due to DG sets The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has issued emission limits for generators up to 800 KW. The same are outlined in Table-10.1, and are recommended to be followed.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong - Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 10-3

TABLE-10.2: Emission limits for DG sets prescribed by CPCB Parameter Emission limits (gm/kwhr) NOx 9.2 HC 1.3 CO 2.5 PM 0.3 Smoke limit* 0.7

Note : * Light absorption coefficient at full load (m-1) The above standards need to follow by the contractor operating the DG sets.

c) Dust Control The project authorities will work closely with representatives from the community living in the vicinity of project area to identify areas of concern and to mitigate dust-related impacts effectively (e.g., through direct meetings, utilization of construction management and inspection program, and/or through the complaint response program). To minimize issues related to the generation of dust during the construction phase of the project, the following measures have been identified:

• Identification of construction limits (minimal area required for construction activities).

• When practical, excavated spoils will be removed as the contractor proceeds along the length of the activity.

• When necessary, stockpiling of excavated material will be covered or staged offsite location with muck being delivered as needed during the course of construction.

• Excessive soil on paved areas will be sprayed (wet) and/or swept and unpaved areas will be sprayed and/or mulched. The use of petroleum products or similar products for such activities will be strictly prohibited.

• Contractors will be required to cover stockpiled soils and trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials (or require trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard).

• Contractor shall ensure that there is effective traffic management at site. The number of trucks/vehicles to move at various construction sites to be fixed. Three personnel will be earmarked for this purpose.

• Dust sweeping - The construction area and vicinity (access roads, and working areas) shall be swept with water sweepers on a daily basis or as necessary to ensure there is no visible dust. Five sweepers will be earmarked for this purpose.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong - Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 10-4

10.3 BUDGET An amount of Rs. 12.72 million is earmarked for air pollution control. The details are given in Table-10.3.

TABLE-10.3: Cost estimate for implementation of air pollution control measures S. No. Activity Cost (Rs. million) 1. Repair of roads during construction phase 2.00 2. 3 Traffic managers @ Rs. 10,000 per month for 6

years including 10% escalation per year 2.78

3. 5 sweeper @ Rs. 5,000 per month for 6 years including 10% escalation per year

2.31

4. Provision for water spray @ Rs. 200/ tanker for 10 tankers per day for a period of 6 years (@ escalation of 1-0% every year)

5.63

Total 12.72 10.4 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY The above referred management measures shall be implemented by the Contractor involved in construction phase. The same shall be monitored on a regular basis by the project proponents.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 11-1

CHAPTER-11 MEASURES FOR NOISE CONTROL

11.1 IMPACTS ON NOISE LEVELS In a water resource projects, the impacts on ambient noise levels are expected only during the project construction phase, due to earth moving machinery, etc. Likewise, noise due to quarrying, blasting, vehicular movement will have some adverse impact on the ambient noise levels in the area.

11.2 MITIGATION MEASURES The contractors will be required to maintain properly functioning equipment and comply with occupational safety and health standards. The construction equipment will be required to use available noise suppression devices and properly maintained mufflers.

• Vehicles to be equipped with mufflers recommended by the vehicle manufacturer; • staging of construction equipment and unnecessary idling of equipment within noise;

sensitive areas to be avoided whenever possible; • use of temporary sound fences or barriers to be evaluated; • notification will be given to residents within 300 feet (about 90 m) of major noise generating

activities. The notification will describe the noise abatement measures that will be implemented;

• Monitoring of noise levels will be conducted during the construction phase of the project. In case of exceeding of pre-determined acceptable noise levels by the machinery will require the contractor(s) to stop work and remedy the situation prior to continuing construction.

The following Noise Standards for DG sets are recommended for the running of DG sets during the construction: • The maximum permissible sound pressure level for new diesel generator sets with

rated capacity up to 1,000 kVA shall be 75 dB(A) at 1 m from the enclosure surface. • Noise from the DG set should be controlled by providing an acoustic enclosure or by

treating the enclosure acoustically. • The Acoustic Enclosure should be made of CRCA sheets of appropriate thickness and

structural/ sheet metal base. The walls of the enclosure should be insulated with fire retardant foam so as to comply with the 75 dB (A) at 1 m sound levels specified by CPCB, Ministry of Environment & Forests. An amount of Rs. 0.5 million is earmarked for this purpose.

• The acoustic enclosure/acoustic treatment of the room should be designed for minimum 25 dB (A) Insertion Loss or for meeting the ambient noise standards, whichever is on the higher side.

• The DG set should also be provided with proper exhaust muffler with insertion loss of minimum 25 dB (A).

• Proper efforts to be made to bring down the noise levels due to the DG set, outside its premises, within the ambient noise requirements by proper siting and control measures.

• A proper routine and preventive maintenance procedure for the DG set should be set and followed in consultation with the DG set manufacturer which would help prevent

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 11-2

noise levels of the DG set from deteriorating with use. An amount of Rs. 0.6 million is earmarked for this purpose.

Noise due to crushers Based on literature review, noise generated by crushers is in the range of 79-80 dB (A) at a distance of 250 ft or 80 m from the crusher. Thus, noise level at a distance of 2 m from the crusher shall be of the order of 110 dB (A). The exposure to labour operating in such high noise areas shall be restricted upto 30 minutes on a daily basis. Alternatively the workers need to be provided with ear muffs or plugs, so as to attenuate the noise level near the crusher by at least 15 dB (A). The exposure to noise level in such a scenario is limited up to 4 hours per day.

It is known that continuous exposure to noise levels above 90 dB (A) affects the hearing of the workers/operators and hence has to be avoided. Other physiological and psychological effects have also been reported in literature, but the effect on hearing acuity has been specially stressed. To prevent these effects, it has been recommended by international specialist organizations that the exposure period of affected persons be limited as specified in Table-11.1.

TABLE-11.1 Maximum Exposure Periods specified by OSHA

Maximum equivalent continuous noise level dB (A)

Unprotected exposure period per day for 8 hrs/day and 5 days/week

90 8 95 4 100 2 105 1 110 1/2 115 ¼ 120 No exposure permitted at or this level

11.2.1 Noise due to vehicles movement The Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) standard for noise for Industrial area during day time are 75 dB (A) and during night time it is 70 dB (A). As per the baseline established during EIA study, the pre-project maximum noise level is 36 dB (A). If the noise level is doubled due to increase in traffic from project activities, even then the limits will be well within the noise standards as prescribed by CPCB.

The total 60 no. of vehicles movement per day during construction phase will be expected in whole project area, i.e. in a stretch of 12 km. These vehicle movements will not be at a single point source but will be at different places in the entire project area. The proposed detail of vehicular movement is given in Table 11.2.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 11-3

Table 11.2: Detail of Vehicles Movement Name of Project Component Distance from closest

village (km) No. of vehicles/day

Barrage & Intake ½ 8 Adit-1 ½ 6 Adit-2 2 6 Adit-3 3.5 6

P/H Complex 4.0 8 TRT 5.0 4

Surge Shaft 5.0 5 Labor Camp-1 ½ 3 Labor Camp-2 5.0 3

Others 0-12 11 TOTAL 60

11.3 BUDGET An amount of Rs 1.1 million has been earmarked for implementation of various measures. The details are given in Table-11.3.

TABLE - 11.3: Cost estimate for implementation of various noise control measures S. No. Activity Cost (Rs million) 1. Construction of acoustic enclosure for DG sets 0.5

2. Maintenance of DG sets 0.6 Total 1.1 11.4 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY The above referred management measures shall be implemented by the Contractor involved in construction phase. The same shall be monitored on a regular basis by the project proponents.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 12-1

CHAPTER-12 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

12.1 CONTROL OF WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

During project construction phase, sufficient measures need to be implemented to ameliorate the problem of water pollution from various sources. The sewage generated from various labour camps is proposed to be treated in an oxidation ditch, prior to its disposal. However, efforts shall be made to discharge the treated effluent only in these water bodies, which are not used for meeting domestic water requirements.

The construction activities would require a crusher to crush large lumps of rocks to the requisite size for coarse as well as fine aggregates. The effluent generated from these crushers will have high-suspended solids. The effluent needs to be treated before disposal. Settling tanks of appropriate size for treatment of effluent from various crushers should be provided.

During tunneling work the ground water flows into the tunnel along with construction water, which is used for various works like drilling, shortcreting, etc. The effluent thus generated in the tunnel contains high suspended solids. Normally, water is collected in the side drains and drained off into the nearest water body without treatment. It is recommended to construct a settling tank of adequate size to settle the suspended impurities. It is expected that about 2 to 3 adits shall be required for the tunneling work. Thus, effluents are expected to be generated from 2 to 3 locations. The sludge from the various settling tanks can be collected once in 15 days and disposed at the site designed for disposal of municipal solid wastes from the labour camps. The sludge after drying could also be used as cover material for landfill disposal site. An amount of Rs.3.0 million needs to be earmarked for construction of various settling tanks.

12.2 CONTROL OF WATER POLLUTION DURING OPERATION PHASE

In the project operation phase, a plant colony with 30 quarters is likely to be set up. It is recommended to provide a suitable Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) to treat the sewage generated from the colony. The cost required for construction of sewage STP in the project colony has already been covered in the budget earmarked for construction of the project colony. Hence, the cost for the same has not been included in the cost estimated for implementation of various measures outlined in the Environmental Management Plan.

12.3 TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE FROM PROJECT COLONY A twin chamber incinerator shall be commissioned to treat the solid waste generated in the project colony.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-1

CHAPTER 13 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN

13.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter essentially deals with the resettlement and rehabilitation issues arising-out as a result of the process of land acquisition for the proposed Shongtong-Karchham Hydro Electric project. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan for the Project Affected Families of the proposed Shongtong-Karchham Hydro Electric project has been prepared in line with the provisions and/or guidelines as given in The Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan of HPPCL, which has been prepared by taking into consideration the R & R Policy notification of Government of HP, vide notification No. Rev (PD)F(5)-1/1999 dated 27-4-06, the National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007 and National Hydro Policy 2008. 13.2 AFFECTED PROPERTIES, LAND AND FAMILIES There are essentially about 9 villages/revenue villages from where private land is likely to be acquired for the proposed Shongtong-Karchham Hydro Electric project. A total of about 77.3326 Ha of land proposed to be acquired. Of this, about 13.8311 Ha is private land, while about 63.5015 Ha is forest land. The overall quantum of land to be acquired for various project appurtenances is given in Table – 13.1.

TABLE – 13.1 Details of land required for acquisition Land details Area (Ha)Private land 13.8311 Forest/ Government land 63.5015 Total 77.3326

Source: Investigation Division, HPSEB, Reckong Peo It is observed that about 13.8311 Ha of private land proposed to be acquired from 9 villages. It is observed that about 158 project affected families (PAF’s) are likely to lose agricultural land in varying proportions. The village-wise details of proposed PAP’s in the project affected villages are depicted in Table 13.2.

TABLE – 13.2 Village-wise details of proposed project affected families Village Name PAFs losing

only land PAFs losing only homestead

PAFs losing land & homestead

Total PAFs

Khwangi 20 -- -- 20 Pawari 6 -- -- 6 Barang 8 -- -- 8 Ralli 31 -- -- 31 Tangling 86 -- -- 86 Yuvrangi 7 -- -- 7 Total 158 -- -- 158

It is also observed from Table-13.2, that a total of 158 PAF’s are likely to lose their lands (agricultural/non-agricultural) in varying proportions.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-2

13.3 PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION The project affected families losing land and/or homesteads plots will be compensated by the project authority in line and within the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. As per Table 13.2 there are 158 PAF’s who are likely to lose land in varying proportions. They will be entitled for compensation of their acquired lands under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In addition, PAPs/ PAF’s that lose their homesteads will also receive compensation of homesteads being acquired, based on assessment and evaluation (based on age of building, material used for construction, etc.) carried-out by an agency deputed for this purpose. Further other properties, such as fruit bearing and timber trees will be assessed and compensation amount will be due to the respective PAFs. Compensation will also be paid to the various public utility buildings, structures, spaces, etc., which will be given to the concerned departments/ agencies. 13.4 SALIENT FEATURES OF RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN OF HPPCL • Concept of Project Affected Area: Where land is acquired for construction of any

component of the project, submergence area, infrastructure, township, offices, construction facilities, welfare facilities, under ground work etc. Unit for declaring Project Affected Area would be Panchayat.

• Concept of Project Affected Zone: Area surrounding the Project’s Affected Area where impact of the project on the lives of people is considerable even if no direct project activity is taking place in these surrounding areas. Unit for declaring this would be Panchayat.

• Sharper definition of Main Project Affected Families: Main Project Affected Family is a Project Affected Family whose land or house/ building is acquired for the project. Reliance placed on Panchayat Parivar Register for identifying Project Affected Family.

• Baseline Survey and Social Impact Assessment: Baseline Survey and Social Impact Assessment Study is being carried out through independent, professional agency in order to determine the impact that the project can have on the people, their lives, the community and the society.

• Provision of Annuity Policy: Annuity Policy will be arranged for each vulnerable PAF [disabled, destitute, orphans, widows, unmarried girls (with no financial support), abandoned women, or poor persons above fifty years of age (who are unsupported)] who are not provided or cannot immediately be provided with alternative livelihood and who are not otherwise covered as part of a family which will provide a pension of Rs. 1000/-PM to the family.

• Free Electricity: As envisaged under R&R Plan of HPPCL each PAF (Project Affected Family) will be given 100 units of free electricity per month for a period of 10 years from the date of commissioning of the project.

• Resettlement Grant to Landless: Family whose land before acquisition was more than 5 bighas and is left with one biswa or no agriculture land after acquisition.

Rs. 2.50 lac lump sum.

Family whose land before acquisition was less than five bighas and is left with one biswa or no agriculture land after acquisition.

Rs. 1.50 lac lump sum.

Family whose land holding is left with more than one biswa and less than 2-10-0 bighas of land after acquisition.

Rs. 1.00 lac lump sum.

Family whose land holding is left with more than 2-10-0 and less than five bighas of land after acquisition.

Rs. 75,000/- lump sum.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-3

Family whose cattle shed is acquired in the project area. Rs. 10,000/- (not exceeding

Rs. 25,000/- per family)

• Resettlement Grant to PAF becoming Houseless- Plot of 250 Sq Mtr permitting house

with 150 plinth area in addition to the building cost @ Rs 4,000 per square meter with a Maximum Limit of Rs. 6.0 lakh or payment @ Rs. 5,000/ per square meter with maximum limit of 150 square meter or Rs 7.5 lakh for those who chose to build house on their own plot.

• Resettlement Grant to Project Affected Shopkeeper-Grant Rs. 20,000/- in addition to one-time financial assistance of Rs 200,000 will be paid to Project Affected Shopkeeper.

• Rehabilitation Colony – In the Rehabilitation Colony all the Infrastructure facilities – water supply, sewerage, drainage, electricity, streets, community centre, green area, paths/roads etc will be provided.

• Forest Right to be compensated: If PAF’s have rights over minor forest produce like herbs, chilgoza etc and acquisition of such Govt./Forest land will deprive them of income/benefit which they were deriving from their right they may be suitably compensated by a lump-sum grant.

• Water sources to be restored: Inventorization and videography of all the water sources will be done before starting of project activity, if any damage occurs due to project activity it will be compensated.

• Compensation if any loss of cultivation on less productions during construction period: If yield of horticulture produce like apple reduces during project construction period due to dust or other factors, compensation will also be provided after assessment.

• Land Acquisition through negotiation as far as possible. • Transport for relocation at project cost or Rs. 20,000 lump-sum. Stamp duty and other fee

will be borne by project. Transitional/subsistence allowance @ 25 days/month for 12 months will be paid.

• Land in lieu of land for PAF rendered landless or financial assistance @ Rs. 50,000/- per bigha of land acquired (in addition to land cost)will be paid.

• If allotted wasteland, then land development charges @ 15,000/- per bigha, if agricultural land then @ 10,000/- per bigha will be paid.

• Employment – as per state policy. Main PAF, if not employed by project, then @ 1000 days min. wage. Petty contract up to Rs. 5.0 lakhs to PAF. Contract vehicles preferably from PAF.

Schemes Initiated by HPPCL to perform its Corporate Social Responsibility and giving more & more benefits to PAF. • Scheme for skill up-gradation of local youth – sponsoring candidates from Project

Affected Families in ITI: This scheme is a fully sponsored scheme of HPPCL and the aim of the scheme is to upgrade the skill of PAFs to make them employable and/or self dependent. Full fee of the ITI is paid for entire duration of the course by HPPCL and the sponsored candidate is also given a scholarship of Rs. 1,000/-per month.

• Merit and Support Scholarship Scheme for wards of PAFs: The scheme aims to

enhance educational standards and employability of the wards of PAF; minimize dropouts of meritorious but financially not sound students. The subject cited scheme was initiated by HPPCL in the year 2009-10.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-4

• Training-cum-Awareness Camps: Based on experience elsewhere that PAFs after loosing

land and getting huge amounts in compensation are unable to recoup their living standards or livelihoods, HPPCL, with a view to improve the condition of PAF has launched this scheme of providing training and/or creating awareness on a number of subjects/aspects/topics including investment counseling such as agriculture, horticulture food preservation, Non-Timber Forest Produce bee-keeping (apiculture), fish rearing, animal husbandry, rural artisan, handicraft.

• Scheme for involving Community Based Organizations: The scheme aims to involve local Community Based Organizations (CBOs) like Mahila Mandals and Yuvak Mandals in creating awareness on a number of issues and also about HPPCL like various safeguarding measures being taken by HPPCL; R&R Provisions; entitlements of PAFs; rates being offered for land compensation; and various schemes being run for PAFs etc. Nodal CBO would be identified to help HPPCL in creating awareness and CBO would get one-time financial assistance in cash or in kind to a maximum amount of Rs. 1,00,000/-.

• HPPCL sponsored annual sports event for each project separate for men and for women: The scheme aims to involve rural youth in sport activities living in the PAA/PAZ (Project Affected Area/Project Affected Zone) as youth play important role in shaping public opinion and influence decision making process within families as also help in spreading awareness about HPPCL. Tournament would be organized for various sporting activities separately for men and women. The financial norm for organizing the tournament for Team Event and Individual Event would be Rs. 30000/- and Rs. 15000/- respectively. 7 Nos of sports event have been organized in various projects.

• Competition for school students: The scheme is again an awareness exercise with CSR objectives wherein annual competitions for students of High Schools and Senior Secondary Schools in PAA and PAZ would be organized covering events like d`ebates, essay-writing, poetry competition, slogan coining, quiz, cultural activities etc. Financial norms for School level competitions are about Rs. 10,000/- per school and annual fair (Varshik mela) Rs. 2.50 lakh..

• Self Employment Scheme for Project Affected Families: This scheme is based on self employment through small business venture. This could be in the form of small industry, agriculture or horticulture based activity, animal husbandry related activity or any service. Activity could be taken up by one family or one member in the family on individual basis. The activity could also be taken up in a group where either the activity is large or there are advantages of working in a group. The objective of the scheme is to assist families for starting their own occupation towards becoming self-employed and also becoming capable to provide employment to others. Financial Assistance worth Rs. 50,000/- per applicant (sole or joint) will be provided to the eligible families fulfilling the requirement for this assistance.

• R&R Medical Fund Scheme: HPPCL has instituted a dedicated fund titled as ‘R&R Medical Fund’. This fund can be accessed for meeting the expenses on medical facilities not covered in any other scheme/plan of HPPCL or for supplementing such expenses under other schemes as per requirement. The principal aim of the scheme is to improve health conditions and increase longevity of PAFs and other eligible persons. Objectives of the scheme are preventing diseases in PAA and PAZ through focused immunization, providing free medical check-up, purveying free medicine to needy, giving assistance for such medical treatment as are not possible in medical camps, providing assistance for treatment by specialist(s) or for critical diseases or referral cases, assistance in case of accidents, assisting the disabled PAFs acquire specialized kits/aid.

• Special Benefits to ST PAFs - Scheme for providing compensation in lieu of Forest-rightsThe subject cited scheme has been formulated to provide compensation to the

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-5

affected ST (Scheduled Tribe) PAFs for loss of benefits accruing due to exercise of customary forest rights and in return obtaining their cooperation for construction of project. In this scheme financial assistance is to be provided to ST PAFs for loss of income from exercise of forest-rights with the understanding that the beneficiary shall lend their unstinted support and cooperation for construction of HPPCL Project and shall not cause any hindrance and/or obstruction or work stoppage of the HPPCL project. They can be compensated in two ways: Cash Compensation by assessing the income from the forest produce and paying annually or by wage payment equivalent to 500 day’s wages periodically.

• Scheme for Compensation for Minor Minerals as R&R Measure: The government ownership lands include river beds and other similar areas also from where people and/or Panchayats have been extracting minor minerals (Sand and aggregate) for personal use as well as for earning incomes. When such lands are acquired or diverted for the purpose of the project, benefit and income there from cease to accrue. If the land happens to be government land, all payment is received by the concerned department and no compensation is paid to people or Panchayat in lieu of impact on their customary rights. The scheme envisages payment of compensation to G.P. in a manner that it gets recurring annual income equal to amount that it got by auctioning minor minerals for distribution amongst families.

The detailed R&R Plan of HPPCL can be read and downloaded at the official website of HPPCL i.e. www.hppcl.gov.in.

13.5 INSTITUTIONAL/ ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE R &R MEASURES 13.5.1 Appointment of Administrator and Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement and their powers and functions As per NRRP 2007, where the appropriate Government is satisfied that there is likely to be involuntary displacement of large number of persons due to acquisition of land for any project or due to any other reason, it may; and where the appropriate Government is satisfied that there is likely to be involuntary displacement of four hundred or more families en masse in plain areas, or two hundred or more families en masse in tribal or hilly areas, DDP blocks or areas mentioned in the Schedule V or Schedule VI to the Constitution due to acquisition of land for any project or due to any other reason, it shall, appoint, by notification, by the State Government (s) concerned, in respect of that project, an officer not below the rank of district Collector of the State Government to be appointed as the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R). The Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement shall be assisted by such officers and employees as the appropriate Government may provide. Subject to the superintendence, directions and control of the appropriate Government and Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement, the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement shall take all measures for the rehabilitation and resettlement of the affected families. The overall control and superintendence of the formulation, execution and monitoring of the rehabilitation and resettlement plan shall vest in the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement. Subject to any general or special order of the appropriate Government, the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement shall perform the following functions and duties: (i) minimize displacement of people and to identify non-displacing or least-displacing

alternatives in consultation with the requiring body; (ii) hold consultation with the affected families while preparing a rehabilitation and

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-6

resettlement scheme or plan; (iii) ensure that interests of the adversely affected persons of Scheduled Tribes and weaker

sections are protected; (iv) prepare a draft scheme or plan of rehabilitation and resettlement as required under

Chapter VI of this policy; (v) prepare a budget including estimated expenditure of various components of acquisition

of land, rehabilitation and resettlement activities or programs in consultation with representatives of the affected families and the requiring body;

(vi) arrange adequate land, as far as possible, for rehabilitation and resettlement of the affected families;

(vii) allot land and sanction the benefits to the affected families; (viii) Perform such other functions as the appropriate Government may, from time to time, by

order in writing, assign.

The administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement may, by order in writing, delegate such of the administrative powers conferred and duties imposed on him by or under this policy to any officer not below the rank of Tehsildar or equivalent. All officers and staff appointed by the appropriate Government under this policy shall be subordinate to the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement. The State Government shall appoint an officer of the rank of Commissioner or of equivalent rank of that Government for rehabilitation and resettlement in respect of such cases to which this policy applies to be called the Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement. For the purposes of this policy, the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement and other officers and employees appointed for the purposes of rehabilitation and resettlement of the affected families shall be subordinate to the Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement. The Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement shall be responsible for supervising the formulation of rehabilitation and resettlement plans (R&R) schemes and proper implementation of such plans or schemes. 13.5.2 Grievance Redressal Mechanism For each project which involves involuntary displacement of four hundred or more families en masse in plain areas, or two hundred or more families en masse in tribal or hilly areas, DDP blocks or areas mentioned in the Schedule V or Schedule VI to the Constitution, the appropriate Government shall constitute a Committee under the chairpersonship of the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement, where appointed, or some other senior Government official, where the Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement is not appointed, to be called the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee, to monitor and review the progress of implementation of the scheme or plan of rehabilitation and resettlement of the affected families, and to carry out post-implementation social audits. The Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee constituted as above shall include, apart from officers of the appropriate Government, as one of its members:- • a representative of women residing in the. affected area; • a representative each of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes residing in the

affected area; • a representative of a voluntary organization; • a representative of the lead bank; • Chairperson(s) of the Panchayats and municipalities located in the affected area, or their

nominee(s); • Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly of the area included in the

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-7

affected area; • The Land Acquisition Officer of the project; and • a representative of the Panchayat body. The procedure regulating the business of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee, its meetings and other matters connected thereto shall be such as may be prescribed by the appropriate Government. In the project area district, the State Government shall constitute a standing Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee under the chairpersonship of the district Collector or, as the case may be Deputy Commissioner of the district, to monitor and review the progress of rehabilitation and resettlement of the affected families in the district excluding those covered by the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committees at the project level. An Ombudsman shall be appointed by the state Government, for time-bound disposal of the grievances arising out of the matters covered by this policy. Any affected person, if aggrieved, for not being offered the admissible rehabilitation and resettlement benefits as provided under this policy, may move an appropriate petition for redressal of his or her grievances to the Ombudsman concerned. 13.5.3 Post-Project Monitoring Status of availability of alternative homestead for project affected persons, development of infrastructural facilities such as schools, sewer networks, roads, etc. are some of the aspects which could be considered for monitoring and modifications may be suggested if required. It needs to be appreciated that R & R issues are politically sensitive issues and often need timely attention. For such reasons, it is suggested that the monitoring be conducted by an independent agency not connected with the project. Therefore, an independent Consultant having experience in R & R studies in similar areas, i.e. hilly areas and not connected with the project, can be appointed for monitoring the project. The Consultant will review the rehabilitation and resettlement program after 2nd, 4th and 6th year from the completion of the R&R activity. A total provision of Rs. 0.90 million has been kept in the project estimate for this purpose. 13.6 PARTICIPATION OF PAFs Involvement of affected communities in planning and implementation of rehabilitation programs according to their felt needs and socio-economic conditions is of vital importance. To obtain co-operation, participation and feedback, PAFs need to be systematically informed and consulted during preparation and implementation of resettlement plan about their options and rights. In the proposed project, co-operation and participation of PAFs in the resettlement process could be ensured through their involvement in each of the following stages.

Involvement in preparation of Rehabilitation Master Plan As a part of participatory planning, community meetings should be held on a routine basis to explain about the project and the R & R policy of the project. Direct communication with the PAFs will negate the politicization of the R & R Process. The communication with the PAFs can be through the Village Level Committee.

Involvement of PAFs in implementation process The Village Level Committee can be involved in the implementation of Rehabilitation Plan particularly during the identification of forest land to be allotted to Village Level Committee. They should also be consulted in finding out alternative economic opportunities to supplement their

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-8

household income. However, some NGO groups can also be associated which can interact directly with the project authorities and the affected population. 13.7 ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN UNDER R&R PLAN Table 13.3: Training and Awareness Camps

S. N. Name of Project

Allotted Targets (2010-11) Achievement

PAA PAZ Total

1. Shongtong Karchham HEP

4 1 5 3 achieved and 2 is in progress

PAA - Project Affected Area PAZ – Project Affected Zone Table 13.4. . Merit and Support Scholarship Scheme S. N. Grade of the school for which

Scholarship is proposed Project-wise target allotted Achievement

Shongtong Karchham HEP 1. Matriculation (From 6th standard

up to 10th standard) 17

2. Plus two (11th & 12th standard) 10 3. Vocational Training (ITI) 3 Achieved 4. Diploma in Engineering/

Pharmacy/Computer 3

5. Degree in Engineering/Medicine 3 Total 36 *Other then candidates sponsored by HPPCL under ITI Scheme

Table 13.5. Self Employment Scheme Targets for the Year 2010-11

S. N.

Name of Project Allotted Target 2010-11

Achievement

1. Shongtong-Karchham HEP

5 In progress

PAA - Project Affected Area; PAZ - Project Affected Zone Table 13.6 Project–wise Allotted Target for CBO, School Competition & Varshik Mela

S. N.

Name of the Schemes Project–wise Allotted Target for CBO, School Competition & Varshik Mela PAA

Paz Total Achievement

1. No. of CBOs involve in Awareness & Sensitization work

1 - 1 In progress

2. Proposed number for Organizing School Competition

2 1 3 2 Achieved and 1 is in progress

3. Annual Varshik Mela 1 - 1 In progress 4. Sports Tournament (one for

men & one for women) 2 - 2

In progress Total 6 1 7

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-9

Following activities Undertaken under R&R plan During Year 2009-10: Table 13.7: Training and Awareness Camps

S. N.

Name of Project Allotted Targets (2009-10) Achievement PAA/PAZ Total

1 1. Shongtong Karchham HEP 4 4

Table 13.8: Merit and Support Scholarship Scheme

S. N.

Grade of the school for which Scholarship is proposed

Allotted Targets (2009-10) Achievement Shongtong -Karchham HEP

Achieved

1. Matriculation (From 6th standard up to 10th standard)

15

2. Plus two (11th & 12th standard) 5 3. Vocational Training (ITI) 3 4. Diploma in Engineering/

Pharmacy/Computer 2

5. Degree in Engineering/Medicine 2 Total 27 *Other then candidates sponsored by HPPCL under ITI Scheme

Table 13.9: Project–wise Allotted Target for CBO S. N. Name of the Schemes Project–wise Allotted Target for CBO, School

Competition & Varshik Mela PAA/PAZ Total Achievement

1. No. of CBOs involve in Awareness & Sensitization work

1

1 Achieved

2. Number for school competition to be organizing

2

2 1 Achieved

3. Annual Varshik Mela 1 1 Nil 4. Candidates nominated to

ITI for Academic Session 2009-10

10 - 10 Achieved

Total 14 14

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Center for Environment 13-10

13.8 BUDGETS FOR RESETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION A total budget of Rs. 39.3 million is required for implementation of Rehabilitation Plan. The details are given in Table 13.10.

TABLE 13.10: Budgetary estimate for implementation of R&R Plan S. No. R&R Components Tentative Cost

(Rs in millions) A Financial Assistance under standard R&R plan 16.5 B Funds for R&R scheme 7.8

C Contingencies including compensation for unforeseen damages etc.

15.0

Total Rs. 39.3 millions

Note: If Alternative land in any eventuality is to be given, cost of the same will be extra. Cost for minor minerals will be extra.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-1

CHAPTER-14 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

14.1 THE NEED Environmental monitoring is an essential component for sustainability of any water resources project. It is an integral part of any environmental assessment process. Any water resources development project introduces complex inter-relationships in the project area between people, various natural resources, biota and the many developing forces. Thus, a new environment is created. It is very difficult to predict with complete certainty the exact post-project environmental scenario. Hence, monitoring of critical parameters is essential in the project operation phase. An Environmental Monitoring Program has been designed with the following objectives:

• Assess the changes in environmental conditions, if any, during construction and operation of the project.

• Monitor the effective implementation of mitigatory measures. • Warning of any significant deterioration in environmental quality so that additional

mitigatory measures may be planned in advance.

14.2 AREAS OF CONCERN From the monitoring point of view, the important parameters are water quality, land use, ambient air quality, ecology, etc. An attempt is made to establish early warning of indicators of stress on the environment. Suggested monitoring details are outlined in the following sections.

14.3 WATER QUALITY Construction Phase It is proposed to monitor the effluent before and after treatment from oxidation ditch. The frequency of monitoring could be once per month. It is assumed that a oxidation ditches shall be constructed to treat the sewage generated from the labour camp at Ropa. It is proposed to analyse 120 samples/year. The parameters to be monitored include pH, Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids.

Operation phase The surface water quality of the proposed reservoir and Malana Nallah needs to be monitored thrice a year. The proposed parameters to be monitored are as follows: pH, Temperature, Electrical Conductivity, Turbidity, Total Dissolved Solids, Calcium, Magnesium, Total Hardness, Chlorides, Sulphates, Nitrates, DO, COD, BOD, Iron, Zinc and Manganese. The sampling sites shall be:

- 1 km upstream of the barrage site.

- Reservoir water.

- 1, 5 and 10 km downstream of the confluence of the tail race discharge.

During project operation phase, a Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) is proposed to be set up to treat the effluent from the project colony. Once every week, it is envisaged to analyse a sample each before and after treatment from the STP. The parameters to be analysed include pH, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-2

14.4 AIR QUALITY AND METEOROLOGY Project Construction Phase The ambient air quality monitoring during construction phase can be carried out by an external agency, approved by State Pollution Control Board at four stations close to construction sites. Every year monitoring is to be done for the Winter, Summer, and Post-monsoon and seasons:

The frequency of monitoring could be twice a week for four consecutive weeks at each station for each season. The parameters to be monitored are Respirable Particulate Matter (RPM) and Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM), Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx).

14.5 NOISE Project Construction Phase Noise emissions from vehicular movement, operation of various construction equipment may be monitored during construction phase at major construction sites. The frequency of monitoring shall be once every three months. For monitoring of noise generators and Integrating Sound Level Meter will be required.

Project Operation Phase No major impact due to noise is observed in operation phase.

14.6 SOIL EROSION AND SILTATION Project Construction Phase No monitoring programme is suggested for project construction phase.

Project Operation Phase Soil erosion rates, slope stability of embankments of barrage, efficacy of soil conservation measures, need to be closely monitored twice a year. The HPSEB staff at the project site can do the study. The study should be undertaken throughout the life of the project so as to design the soil erosion prevention measures and also for the rehabilitation/decommissioning of the project. Following parameters like soil erosion rates, stability of bank embankment would be measured. In addition to above, soil quality at various locations in the catchment area needs to be monitored once every year. The parameters to be monitored are pH, organic matter and texture.

14.7 ECOLOGY Project Construction Phase A detailed ecological survey covering forestry, fisheries, wildlife is recommended during entire construction phase. The survey can be conducted once every year for the entire construction period. A provision of Rs. 2.1 million is earmarked for this purpose. The various aspects to be covered include:

- Qualitative & Quantitative assessment of flora and fauna.

- Monitoring of restoration of muck disposal area.

Project Operation Phase Status of afforestation program, changes in migration patterns of the aquatic and terrestrial fauna species should be studied. The study could be undertaken with a frequency of 5 years till the entire design life of the barrage. A provision of Rs.0.5 million per study can be kept for this purpose. Thus the annual expenditure can be taken as 0.1 million/ year. The

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-3

monitoring can be conducted by a reputed external agency.

14.8 INCIDENCE OF WATER-RELATED DISEASES Project Construction Phase Identification of water-related diseases, adequacy of local vector control and curative measures, status of public health are some of the parameters which should be closely monitored three times a year with the help of data maintained in the government dispensaries/hospitals.

Implementation Public Health Department, & Dispensary constructed for labour camps

Cost per annum Rs. 0.1 million Project Operation Phase Increased prevalence of various vector borne diseases and adequacy of local vector control and curative measures need to be monitored. The monitoring can be done three times in a year.

Implementation Dispensary at the project site Cost per annum Rs. 0.10 million

Monitoring of aquatic ecology will be essential to achieve sustainable yield of fish. Some of the parameters to be monitored are phytoplankton, zooplanktons, benthic life and fish composition, etc. The monitoring can be conducted by a reputed external agency, for which an amount of Rs. 0.30 million/year can be earmarked.

14.9 LAND USE PATTERN Project Operation Phase During project operation phase, it is proposed to monitor land use pattern once every year. An amount of Rs. 0.3 million can be earmarked for this purpose.

14.10 MUCK DISPOSAL SITES Project Construction Phase It is recommended to monitor the status of various muck disposal sites including status of plantation, various engineering control structures, etc.

Project Operation Phase No monitoring program is suggested for project operation phase.

14.11 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The details of environmental monitoring program are given in Tables 14.1 and 14.2 respectively.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-4

TABLE-14.1 Summary of Environmental Monitoring Program during Project Construction Phase S. No. Item Parameters Frequency Location

1. Effluent from septic tanks

pH, BOD, COD, TSS, TDS Once every month

Before and after treatment from Oxidation ditch

2. Water Quality (Surface)

BOD, COD, DO, pH and related parameters

Quarterly on all vital points on the river within project area including tail end.

• River water 500m upstream of barrage site. • At barrage site. • Upstream of labour colony/ sheds. • Downstream of septic tanks. • 1km downstream of TRT outlet.

3. Water Quality (Groundwater)

BOD, COD, DO, pH and related parameters

Quarterly at locations where ground water use is significant.

Same as for the surface water.

4. Water-related diseases

Identification of water related diseases, adequacy of local vector control and curative measure, etc.

Three times a year

Labour camps and colonies

5. Noise Equivalent noise level (Leq) Once in three months

At major construction sites.

6. Air quality SPM, RPM, SO2 and NOx Once every season

At major construction sites

7. Meteorological aspects

Wind direction & velocity temperature humidity, rain

Once every season

At one of the ambient air quality sampling sites

TABLE-14.2: Summary of Environmental Monitoring Program during Project Operation Phase S. No. Items Parameters Frequency Location

1. Water pH, Temperature, EC, Turbidity, Total Dissolved Solids, Calcium, Magnesium, Total Hardness, Chlorides, Sulphates, Nitrates, DO. COD, BOD, Iron, Zinc,

Thrice a year • 1 km upstream of barrage site • Reservoir area • 1, 5 and 10 km downstream of Tail Race discharge

2. Effluent from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

pH, BOD, COD, TSS, TDS Weekly Before and after treatment from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

3. Erosion & Siltation

Soil erosion rates, stability of bank embankment, etc.

Bi annually -

4 Ecology Status of afforestation program of green belt development

Once in 2 years -

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-5

5 Water- related diseases

Identification of water- related diseases, sites, adequacy of local vector control measures, etc.

Three times a year

• Villages adjacent to project sites

6. Aquatic ecology

Phytoplankton, Zooplankton, benthic life, fish composition

Yearly • 1 km upstream of barrage site Reservoir area • 1, 5 and 10 km downstream of Tail Race discharge

7 Land use Land use pattern using satellite data

Yearly Catchment area

8 Soil pH, EC, texture, organic matter

Yearly Catchment area

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-6

TABLE-14.3: Environment Monitoring Plan Environment component

Project stage Parameters to be monitored

Location Frequency Standards Rate Implementation Supervision

1 Air Quality A. pre construction stage (The project after assign to contractor)

SO2, NO2, CO2, Pb, SPM Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

Once NAAQS of India

Per sample Rs. 2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

B. construction stage

SO2, NO2, CO2, Pb,PM10, TSPM

Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

Once in 3 month

NAAQS of India

Per sample Rs. 2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

C. Operation stage

SO2, NO2, CO2, Pb,PM10, TSPM

Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

Once NAAQS of India

Per sample Rs. 2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

2 Water Quality

A Pre construction stage (The project after assign to contractor)

pH, Temperature, conductivity, Turbidity, TDS, BOD, COD, DO, Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Nitrates, Chlorides, Hardness, Sulphates, Nitrates, Iron,

Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

Once Water Quality standards from CPCB

Per sample Rs.2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

B. construction stage

pH, Temperature, conductivity, Turbidity, TDS, BOD, COD, DO, Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Nitrates, Chlorides, Hardness, Sulphates, Nitrates, Iron,

Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

monthly Water Quality standards from CPCB

Per sample Rs.2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-7

Environment component

Project stage Parameters to be monitored

Location Frequency Standards Rate Implementation Supervision

C. Operation stage

pH, Temperature, conductivity, Turbidity, TDS, BOD, COD, DO, Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Nitrates, Chlorides, Hardness, Sulphates, Nitrates, Iron,

Three sites namely at Barrage, 1.5 km D/S of Barrage and at TRT

Thrice a year

Water Quality standards from CPCB

Per sample Rs. 2,500

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

3. Noise Vibration

A Pre construction stage (The project after assign to contractor)

Noise level (dB level) At project Components and vicinity area

Once National Environmental (Noise Control) Regulations NAAQS

Per sample Rs.1,200

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

B. construction stage

Noise level (dB level) At project Components and vicinity area

3 times a year

National Environmental (Noise Control) Regulations NAAQS

Per sample Rs.1,200

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

C. Operation stage

Noise level (dB level) At project Components and vicinity area

3 times a year

National Environmental (Noise Control) Regulations NAAQS

Per sample Rs.1,200

Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

4. Soil A. pre construction stage (The project after assign to contractor)

pH , Sulphate (SO2), Chloride , TOC, phosphate, Nitrogen available, Moisture content,

Inside and outside (just close to the proposed site 2 locations) of the proposed substation

Once Technical Specifications

Per sample Rs. 1,200

Contractor by engaging approved monitoring agency (HPSPCB)

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-8

Environment component

Project stage Parameters to be monitored

Location Frequency Standards Rate Implementation Supervision

B. construction stage

pH , Sulphate (SO2), Chloride , TOC, phosphate, Nitrogen available, Moisture content,

Inside and outside (just close to the proposed site 2 locations) of the proposed substation

Two Times Technical Specifications

Per sample Rs. 1,200

Contractor by engaging approved monitoring agency (HPSPCB)

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

C. Operation stage

pH , Sulphate (SO2), Chloride , TOC, phosphate, Nitrogen available, Moisture content,

Inside and outside (just close to the proposed site 2 locations) of the proposed substation

Once Technical Specifications

Per sample Rs. 1,200

Contractor by engaging approved monitoring agency (HPSPCB)

HPPCL/ HPSPCB

Notes: - Transport & Accommodation cost etc. are not included for the EMoP Rates. Information based on the quotation provided by HPSPCB notification 2004 (Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board).

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-9

14.12 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Environment monitoring both in construction and operation phases for Air, Water, Noise, Muck disposal including protection works for muck disposal sites etc shall be done by the HPSPCB and its associate concern in the Department of Science and Environment (to Society for Environment Protection and sustainable development) GoHP. Following financial provision may be made in the Environment Monitoring Plan. “Institutional support for Environment Monitoring logistics and information systems, Environmental awareness, Environmental Monitoring Report preparation & dissemination etc:

a) to HPSPCB Rs. 95.00 lakhs For Environment monitoring both in construction and operation phases for Air, Water (including coliform), Noise, Muck disposal including protection works for muck disposal sites etc.

b) to Society for Environment Protection and sustainable development at Department of Environment GoHP

Rs. 40.00 lakhs

Total Rs. 135.00 lakhs or Rs. 13.5 million

The Environment Monitoring Reports in respect of Shongtong-Karchham HEP generated by the above two bodies shall be shared with the Project Proponent (HPPCL).”

HPSPCB Notification regarding rate of Pollutants monitoring is attached as Annexure 14.1.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-10

Annexure 14.1 HPSPCB Notification regarding rate of Pollutants monitoring

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-11

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-12

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-13

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 14-14

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 15-1

CHAPTER 15 COST ESTIMATES

15.1 COSTS FOR IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The total amount to be spent for implementation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is Rs. 1,086.13 million. The details are given in Table-15.1.

TABLE-15.1: COST FOR IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

S. No. Item Cost (Rs million)

1. Compensatory Afforestation, NPV, Cost of Trees and Bio-diversity conservation

59.95

2. Catchment Area Treatment 604.26 3. Fisheries Management 22.60 4. Public health delivery system 62.30 5. Environmental Management in labor camp 60.31 6. Muck management 184.71 7. Restoration and Landscaping of construction sites 15.50 8. Environmental management in road construction 7.12 9. Greenbelt development 4.00 10. Air pollution control 12.72 11. Noise Control 1.10 12. Water Pollution Control 3.00 13. Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan 39.30 14. Compensation for loss of agriculture produce during

Construction phase 10.00

15. Environmental Monitoring during construction phase (Refer Table-15.2)

16.37

16. Provision for consultancy services for CDM 5.00

17. Consent to establish from HPSPCB and its renewal every year during construction phase

4.5

Total 1112.74 15.2 COSTS FOR IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Cost for Implementing Environmental Monitoring Program during construction phase Rs.16.37 million. The construction period for estimation of costs for Environmental Monitoring program has been taken as 6 years. The details are given in Table-15.2. The cost required for implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Program during Operation phase is of the order of Rs.1.16 million/year. The details are given in Table-15.3.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 15-2

Table-15.2: Cost for Implementing Environmental Monitoring Programme during construction phase S. No Item Cost (Rs.

million/year)Total cost 6 years with 10%

escalation (Rs million) 1 Water quality 13.50 2 Air quality 3 Muck disposal 4 Ecology 2.10 5 Incidence of water related

Diseases 0.10 0.77

Total 1.07 16.37 TABLE-15.3: Cost for Implementing Environmental Monitoring Programme during operation phase

S. No Item Cost (Rs million/year)1 Water quality 0.46 2 Ecology 0.1 3 Incidence of water related diseases 0.3 4 Land use pattern 0.3 Total 1.16

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 16-1

CHAPTER-16 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES

Parameters to be monitored during project cycle with frequency are given below in table 16.1 there are to be ensured by HPPCL. Item Parameter Frequency Location Project construction phase Effluent from septic tank

pH, BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, DO

One in a month Before and after treatment from septic tank

Water related disease

Identification of water related diseases, adequacy curative measure, etc.

Three times a year

Labour camps and colonies

Noise Equivalent noise level (Leq) Once in three months

At major construction sites

Meteorological aspects

Wind direction & velocity temperature humidity rain

Three time a year At one of the ambient air quality sampling sites

Air Quality RSPM, SPM, Nox, CO etc. Once in a month • All underground component/areas.

• Muck dumping sites and road side.

Project operation phase Water pH, Temperature, EC,

Turbidity, Total Dissolve solids, Calcium Magnesium, Total Hardness, Chlorides, Sulphate, Nitrates, BOD, COD, DO, Iron, Zinc

Three times in a year

• 1 km upstream of dam site • Submergence area • 1, 5 and 10 km

downstream of dam site

Water related disease

Identification of water related diseases, sites, adequacy of local vector control measures, etc.

Twice a year • Village adjacent to project area

Soil pH, EC, texture, organic matter Twice a year • Catchment area Terrestrial Ecology Status of afforestation

programs Twice a year Aforestation site

Aquatic ecology

Phytoplankton, Zooplanktons, benthic life, fish composition

Twice a year • 1 km upstream of dam site • Submergence area • 1, 5 and 10 km

downstream of barrage siteLand use Land use pattern using satellite

data Once in a year • Catchment area

The Summary of impacts, suggested management measures and implementing agency has been given in Table-16.2.

TABLE-16.2: Summary of Impacts, Suggested Management measures and implementing agency

S. No. Parameters Impact Management Measures Implementing Agency

1. WATER ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Construction

phase Water pollution due to disposal of sewage from labour colonies.

Provision of community toilets and Oxidation ditch.

HPPCL and project contractor

Deterioration water quality due to effluent

Provision of settling tank Project contractor

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 16-2

S. No. Parameters Impact Management Measures Implementing Agency

from crusher Operation

phase Deterioration of water quality in the dry stretch of river due to reduced flow during the lean season.

A scientific study from a reputed institute for deciding the minimum environmental flow to be released during the lean season should be undertaken. Till the study is completed, 20 % of the average flow of four consecutive leanest months of 90% dependable year shall be maintained as environmental flow. After the study is completed, whichever is higher figure shall be adopted.

HPPCL. Operation manual to be framed accordingly.

Disposal of sewage from project colony.

Commissioning of Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) in common township and at project site-portable STP or smaller STP.

HPPCL

Eutrophication problem Eutrophication risks are minimal; hence, specific management measures are not required.

Water Resources Operation

phase River stretch from barrage site to tailrace outfall will have reduced flow during lean season

A scientific study from a reputed institute for deciding the minimum environmental flow to be released during the lean season should be undertaken. Till the study is completed, 20 % of the average flow of four consecutive leanest months of 90% dependable year shall be maintained as environmental flow. After the study is completed, whichever is higher figure shall be adopted.

HPPCL/Operation staff.

2 AIR ENVIRONMENT Construction

phase Fugitive emissions due to crusher operation at various sites.

Commissioning of cyclone on crusher.

Project contractor

Increased in SPM level due to vehicular movement during construction

Provision of Water sprinkler to settle SPM

Project contractor

Emission of SO2 due to combustion of fuel in construction equipment

SO2 not expected to increase significantly

Poor Air quality – in underground area

Frequent checking and air injection/blowers of adequate capacity

HPPCL and Project Contractor

3. NOISE ENVIRONMENT Construction

phase Marginal increase in noise levels due to operation of various construction equipments.

Maintenance of construction equipment Provision of ear plug/ear muffler Working Gear – gloves, boots, goggles, helmet etc.

HPPCL and Project Contractor

4. LAND ENVIRONMENT

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 16-3

S. No. Parameters Impact Management Measures Implementing Agency

Construction Phase

Erosion due to quarrying operation for coarse and fine aggregate

Proper mining plan for quarrying operation

Project Contractor and HPPCL

Rehabilitation plan for quarry sites after extraction of construction material

Generation of Muck due to underground work

Disposal of Muck at designated muck disposal site

Project Contractor and HPPCL

Restoration of Muck disposal sites of disposal is over.

Erosion due to construction of road

Cut-slope to be protected by breast walls

Project Contractor and HPPCL

Provision of catch water and intercepting drain

Plantation of tree along road side. Acquisition of about

77.3326 ha. forest and private land

Compensatory afforestation in lieu of forest land

Project Contractor and HPPCL

Net productivity value and cost of tree to be cut to be given to Forest department.

Forest Department and Revenue Department

R& R Plan formulated for families losing land as per the provisions of approved R& R Policy.

5. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Terrestrial Flora

Construction phase

Cutting of trees for meeting fuel wood requirements by labour.

Provision of subsidized electric heaters, kerosene, Fuel wood (from authorized sources) and LPG to construction labour and technical staff.

Project Contractor/ HPPCL

Operation phase

Acquisition of about 63.5015 Ha forest land.

Compensatory Afforestation. Forest Department

Terrestrial Fauna

Construction phase

Disturbance to wildlife due to operation of various construction equipment

Pollution control norm compliant equipment with noise notification

HPPCL and Project Contractor

Disturbance to wildlife due to increased accessibility in the area

Surveillance through frequent check is recommended

Forest Department

Operation phase

Disturbance to wildlife in project area due to increased accessibility

Marginal impact anticipated which could be minimized by strict anti - poaching law.

Forest Department

Aquatic Ecology

Construction phase

Marginal decrease in aquatic productivity due to increased turbidity and lesser light penetration.

Marginal impact hence no specific management measures are suggested.

Project Contractor

Operation phase

Obstruction in the path of migratory fishes.

Provision of fish ladder in the barrage

HPPCL and Project Design

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 16-4

S. No. Parameters Impact Management Measures Implementing Agency

Drying of river stretch downstream of barrage up to tail race outfall.

Development of hatchery for artificial seed and production and stocking of reservoir & river stretch.

Fisheries Deptt.

Release of minimum flow 1 cumec through fish pass

HPPCL/ Operating Staff

6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Construction phase

Increase in employment potential.

Preference to MPAF, PAF and other local inhabitants

HPPCL and Project Contractor

Acquisition of land Formulation of R&R Plan as per

the provisions of approved R&R Policy

HPPCL -

Operation phase

Increased power generation

100 units of free power to all PAF’s

HPPCL

Greater employment opportunity

Preference to MPAF, PAF as per policy

HPPCL

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 17-1

CHAPTER-17 PROJECT BENEFITS

17.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT Installed power generation capacity in India increased for 1,362 MW in 1947 to 64,729 MW in 1990 during that period, energy production jumped from 4 to 264 TWH. However despite that appreciable growth, power demand has almost throughout outstripped the supply. At the end of the 10th Five year plan, shortfall in energy availability on an all India basis is given as per Table 17.1.

Table 17.1: 10th five year plan, shortfall in energy availability Peak (MW)

Year Requirement Availability Surplus (+)/Shortage (-) Surplus/ Shortage (%) 2006 - 07 100,715 86,818 - 13,897 - 13.8

Energy (MU) Year Requirement Availability Surplus (+)/Shortage (-) Surplus/ Shortage (%) 2006 - 07 690,587 624,495 - 66,092 - 9.6

Based on 10th Five year Plan actual capacity addition of 21,180 MW, a capacity addition of 78,577 MW comprising of 39,865 MW (50.7%) in central sector, 27,952 MW (35.6%) in State sector and 10,760 MW (13.7%) in private sector has been proposed during 11th Plan. The hydro power potential of Himachal Pradesh is surplus for its own requirement. However, the surplus power is usefully made available to meet the power and energy requirements in other parts of the country, and very particularly, the northern grid. Therefore, it is necessary to look into energy and power requirement of the northern region while planning of hydropower development in Himachal Pradesh, power demand and supply for all India region wise generating installed capacity (MW) of power utilities including allocated shares in joint and central sector utilities are given in Table-17.2.

Table 17.2: All India region wise generating installed capacity (MW) (As on 31.01.2010)

S. No

Region Thermal Nuclear Hydro R.E.S @ (MNRE)

Total Coal Gas Dsl Total Renewable

1 Northern 23,620.00 3,813.26 12.99 27,446.25 1,620.00 13,622.75 2,777.32 45,466.32 2 Western 29,290.50 8,143.81 17.48 37,451.79 1,840.00 7,447.50 4,918.28 51,657.57 3 Southern 19,172.50 4,690.78 939.32 24,802.60 1,100.00 11,260.03 8,517.55 45,680.18 4 Eastern 17,635.38 190.00 17.20 17,842.58 0.00 3,882.12 344.41 22,069.11 5 North

Eastern 60.00 787.00 142.74 989.74 0.00 1,116.00 223.32 2,329.06

6 Islands 0.00 0.00 70.02 70.02 0.00 0.00 6.10 76.12 7 All India 89,778.38 17,624.85 1,199.75 108,602.98 4,560.00 37,382.40 16,786.98 167,278.36

Captive generating capacity connected to the Grid (MW) = 19,509 Source: DMLF Division, Central Electricity Authority @ R.E.S = Renewable Energy Sources includes Small Hydro Power Projects, Biomass Gas, Biomass Power, Urban and industrial waste power and Wind Energy

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 17-2

Table 17.3: The breakup of the realization of total estimated Hydro Power Potential of Himachal Pradesh is as under:- Sr. No.

Particulars State sector/ HPSEBL/ HPPCL (MW)

Central/ Joint Sector (MW)

Private Sector Total More than 5 MW

Up to 5 MW (through Himurja)

1. Projects commissioned 467 5,490 402 56 6,415 2. Projects under execution /

already allotted 1,063 2,763 1,725 308 5,859

3. Projects allotted and PIA stage

- - 2,605 - 2,605

4. Projects under allotment/to be allotted

210 2,136 2,338 378 5,063

5. Projects abandoned due to environmental considerations

460 - - - 460

6. Self identified Projects in privates sector

- - 473 - 473

Sub total 2,200 10,389 7,543 742 20,875 Sub Total 20,875 7. Project abandoned due to environmental considerations having installed capacity of 460

MW (-) 460

GRAND TOTAL 20,415

It can be seen that peak demand over a period of 20 years is likely to increase by four times from 14,908 MW in 1990-91 to as much as 100,715 MW in 2006-2007. From the growth of peak demand and anticipated installed generating capacity on the basis of schemes proposed for benefits under construction/ consideration during eighth and ninth five year plans, it is observed that there is an urgent need to provide additional capacity to the Northern Grid to meet the increasing demand of the grid. Thus, new schemes need to be taken up immediately for implementation to get the timely benefit.

17.2 PROJECT FEATURES

The Shongtong – Karchham Hydro Electric Project has been envisaged with the purpose of exploiting the potential in the Satluj River between villages Powari and Ralli. The project envisages the construction of: - Diversion barrage, intake structure with 4 intake bays with gates and four intake tunnels

passing through four sedimentation chambers.

- Head Race Tunnel 8.02 km long culminating in open surface surge shaft.

- Three circular steel lined underground pressure shafts to convey water to 3 Francis turbines to generate (3 x 150 MW) 450 MW of power in a underground power house.

- Tail Race Tunnel of 10.0 m dia and 90 m length to discharge flow into river Satluj near village Ralli.

The salient features of the project are given in Table-17.3.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 17-3

TABLE-17.3: Salient features of Shongtong-Karchham hydroelectric project Location State Himachal Pradesh District Kinnaur River Satluj Location Diversion barrage site near village Powari Power House site near village Ralli on NH-22

about 200 km from Shimla Hydrology Catchment area at barrage axis 47,132 sq km Maximum observed average 10 1,666 cumec Daily discharge Design flood 6,819 cumec Firm discharge for 90% availability 67.39cumec 50% availability 131.88 cumec Diversion Barrage Type Sloping Glacis Size 122.6m long at top of barrage Water Bay 87.0 m Top level of Barrage El. 1,958.00 m Full Reservoir Level (FRL) El. 1,956.00 m Maximum Pond Level El. 1,956.00 m Mean Draw Down Level (MDDL) El. 1,945.50 m Crest level El. 1,937.00 m Live storage 431 Ha m. Peaking 3.6 hrs River Bed Level at Barrage axis + El. 1,934.000 m Length of stilling basin 55.00 m Diversion Tunnel Type Circular concrete lined Size 10.0 m dia Length 1658.72 m Bed Slope 1 : 553 Intake structure No. of intake bays 4 Width of each bay 17.17 m Discharge through each bay 101.80 cumec Crest level 1,938.00 m Minimum water level u/s El. 1,945.50 m No. of Intake Gates 4 Size 6.40m x 6.40 m Intake Tunnels No. of Intake Tunnels 4 Type Modified horse shoe Size 6.4 m Design discharge 487.2 cumec Velocity 2.41 m/sec Sedimentation Chambers No. of sedimentation chambers 4 Width 15 m

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 17-4

Depth 31 m Length 530 m Particle size to be arrested +0.20 mm Design discharge 487.2 cumec Flow through velocity 0.22 m/s Silt Flushing Tunnels No. of tunnels from the sedimentation Chambers connected with main silt Flushing tunnel

4

Type D-shaped Diameter 3.0 m Length 70 m Main Silt Flushing Tunnel Type D-shaped, concrete lined Diameter 6.00 m Length 2010.00 m Design discharge 81.2 cumec Head Race Tunnel Type Circular concrete lined Diameter 10.00 m finished Length 8,042.69 m Design discharge 406 cumec Bed slope 1:280.61 Velocity 5.17 m/sec Adits No. of Adits 3 Type D-shaped Size 7.5 m Length 368.00 m (max.) Surge Shaft No. One Type Restricted Orifice (Underground) Diameter 35.0 m Orifice Dia. 5.54 Elevation of centre line of HRT 1905.00 m Elevation at invert of surge shaft 1900.00 m Top elevation 1,982.00 m Maximum upsurge level 1,978.00 m Minimum down surge level 1,919.34 m Pressure Shaft No. 3 Type Circular steel lined (Underground) Diameter 5.80 m (Finished) Length 240.00 m each Power House/Transformer Hall cavity Type Underground Installed capacity 450 MW (3 x 150 MW) Size of machine Hall 120m (L) x 19 m (W) x 40.10 m (H) Size of transformer Hall 120 m (L) x 18 m (W) x 28 m (H) Approach adit to machine hall 8.5 m D-shaped 218.95 m long

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 17-5

Average gross head 142.50 m Net head 124.01 m Tail Race Tunnel Size & Type 10.00 m dia. Circular shape Length 99.66 m Normal tail water level 1,804.65 m Maximum tail water level 1,810.12 m Power Generation Installed capacity 450 MW Annual generation : 90% dependable Year 1,653.13 GWh 50% dependable year 1,887.23 GWh COST ESTIMATE (Rs. In Crores) Civil Works Rs. 1,455.65 Electro-Mechanical Works Rs. 823.51 Total base cost of Project Rs. 2,279.16 Crores (Dec, 2010 Price Level) Financial Aspects Cost per MW of installed capacity Rs. 3.77 crores Sale rate per unit (at bus bar) First year Rs. 3.31 per unit Tenth year Rs. 2.33 per unit Average for 10 years Rs. 2.82 per unit

17.3 PROJECT BENEFITS

The project is expected to provide annual energy generation of about 1,735.5 MU in a 90 % dependable year. The project shall also provide peaking capacity benefits of 450 MW for about 3.4 hours per day during lean season. The project will be constructed in a period of 6 years.

The project has a distinct advantage of very easy accessibility and as such requires minimum area for construction.

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW  

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 1

CHAPTER 18

CHAPTER-18 PUBLIC HEARING, CONSULTATION AND DEMANDS

18.1 Public Consultations:

Consultations were carried out during EIA preparation and will continue throughout the project cycle. A grievance redress mechanism has been formed with Local Area Development Authority (LADA). The EIA was prepared in consultation with stakeholders. Meetings and individual interviews were held involving stakeholders, particularly with PAPs. Public consultation with primary and secondary stakeholders has been conducted to understanding the local issues and public views regarding the possible impact. The group discussion meeting was conduct by HPPCL after pre information to villagers of project area. The issues like, awareness and extent of the project and development components, benefits of project for the economic and social upliftment of community, labor availability in the project area or requirement of outside labor involvement, local disturbances due to project construction work, necessity of tree felling etc. at project sites, water logging and drainage problem if any, drinking water problem, forest and sensitive area nearby the project site etc. During project preparation, consultations were held with the official representatives of the government agencies, apart from the communities in the project area. The issues covered during these consultations included selection of projects and identification of key issues including addressing the current gaps in provision of basic services and improvement of the facilities in the villages for better future. Area-wide stakeholder consultations and workshops were conducted which provided an overview of the projects to be undertaken and discussed the Government and Asian Development Bank (ADB’s) policies and potential impacts of the projects in project area. During the workshop, versions of the prepared reports, policies are provided to ensure stakeholders understood the objectives, policy principles and procedures for any land acquisition, compensation and other assistance measures for any affected person, During consultations, key issues raised were: (i) participants expressed satisfaction towards a project in a national interest and it provided jobs and other source of other income generating activities in the area; (ii) they are not hesitant to provide any help and during construction; (iii) they are willing to provide labor and other services for the project; (v) people of the area requested for proper implementation of EMP and dust control measures as it affect the crop production; (v) they demanded for jobs in the project; (v) they raised that it is important to repair the roads and provision of ropeways after project construction; (vi) peoples are also demanded for minimum the cutting of trees and damage to forest as their livelihood is majorly dependent of forest; (vii) peoples has raised some issues which are wrongly mentioned in the reports and requested for correction; (viii) villagers dependent for proper and fair distribution of compensation of damage occur during construction mainly by vibration of blasting; (ix) villagers demanded providing drinking water and irrigation facilities along with repair of some temples and crematorium of villages out of project (x) finally villager gave their written NOCs along with demands HPPCL for the project. NOC and village demands are attached as Annexure 18.1.

18.2 MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING Detail of issues raised during Public Hearing on 28.07.2009 at 11:00 AM for proposed Shongtong-Karchham HEP (Powari-Ralli), organized by H. P. State Pollution Control Board at village Powari, Tehsil Kalpa, district Kinnaur H.P.:-

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 2

S. No. Issues Raised Remarks on the issue raised

1. The representative of the public raised an objection that project affected families indicated in R&R plan (rehabilitation and resettlement ) is 158 whereas in the earlier R&R plan it was 438 and it was verbally assured by MD, HPPCL to include all 438 families in R&R plan. Therefore, till all the 438 families of Kalpa and Shudharang villages are not covered under project affected families the R&R plan should not be finalized.

The Project Proponent informed that this issue of R&R is under consideration of MD, HPPCL.

2. Cremation ground near dumping No. 3 should be protected.

Project Proponent has assured that the cremation ground shall be protected.

3. Confluence point of Tangling Nallah and Satluj river is a holy place which is used for local rituals. Local people have traditional rights and it should be protected and the Confluence point should be developed properly by the project proponent.

Project Proponent has assured that Confluence point of Tangling Nallah and Satluj shall be developed.

4. Local people have customary rights to collect forest produce such as herbs, medicine plants etc. will be damaged and will affect the income source, therefore all the people of district Kinnaur should be included in project affected families.

All the customary rights related to the forest produce will be protected and every care will be taken so that there is no damage to the forest produce. In case some damage is observed the same shall be compensated by the Project Proponent.

5. Studies on the affect on downstream projects due to desilting has not been done in EIA/EMP.

Sedimentation Chambers four in nos. has been provided for desilting, so no impact on Down Stream projects is envisaged.

6. Impact on water sources and biodiversity due to blasting during construction have not been indicated in EIA/EMP.

Project Proponent agreed to conduct studies.

7. Design of the project is on the bases of ten years data and viability of the project is not properly designed.

Project Proponent clarified that viability of the project has been properly designed.

8. Alignment of the power project has been indicated in the EIA/EMP (Figure No. 1) on the right bank of river Satluj where as in figure No. 2 it is shown on the left bank of the river Satluj.

It has been corrected.

9. In EIA/EMP para-7.5 page No. 7-18 it is mentioned that sand and grit has been collected by M/s JP Karchham-Wangtoo Project from village Jangi and the same query will be used by HPPCL but as a matter of fact this quarry has never been used by M/s J.P. Karchham-Wangtoo Project, which indicates the negligent attitude of agency preparing EIA and as such the data given in EIA is doubtful.

Sand quarry/grit will be collected from as mentioned in para-7.5 page No.7-18 near village Jangi.

10. All the muck dumping sits indicated in the EIA/EMP is on the bank of river Satluj, which is in the flood zone area. In EIA/EMP design of dumping sits has not been shown. What will be the distance of dumping sits from HFL and what will be the angle of repose of muck has not been indicated.

Project Proponent clarified that muck will be dumped in safe designated dumping sites away from HFL and with adequate safe engineering structure so that there is no seepage of muck into river.

11. Due to construction of tunnels in Kinnaur, the fragile areas are being damaged which can be protected by

It was assured by project proponents that if technically, it is possible, TBM can

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 3

S. No. Issues Raised Remarks on the issue raised

the use of Tunnel Boring Machine as being used in Parwati Hydle Power Project in Kullu district. There is no mention of TBM in EIA/EMP. It was suggested that TBM should be used for construction of tunnels in district. Kinnaur.

be used.

12. District Kinnaur is in Seismic zone - 4 and in the past Kinnaur has observed heavy earthquakes. Therefore, big projects should not come up in Kinnaur. In EIA/EMP seismic factor has not been taken in to consideration.

Seismically project has been designed.

13. The existence of all the projects in river Satluj basin is in danger because of no international treaty with China on Satluj river. China has constructed many big projects on Satluj basin and is planning to divert Satluj water to Eastern Tibet which is likely to affect the projects in future. All these aspects has not been mentioned in EIA/EMP.

No comments.

14. Alternative suggestions have been given in EIA/EMP. Suggestion No. 1 to construct dam at Shongtong and to construct tunnel on the right bank of river Satluj is the best option but it has been rejected because of Army Camp near to the proposed Dam. In view of environmental impact and to save property of local people, the suggestion No. 1 may be looked upon.

On the basis of technical studies conducted it was decided to construct HRT on the left bank of river satluj.

15. It is apprehended that the religious place, Kinner Kailash and Shivling will be damaged due to construction of Head Race Tunnel. In such an eventuality the religious sentiments of local people will be hurt and due to melting of glaciers on Kinner Kailash mountain flood situation can be observed. Whereas this aspect is not been addressed in EIA/EMP.

Project Proponent clarified that on the basis of studies conducted it was observed that Kinner Kailash and Shivling are at sufficient height and there is to such threat to Kinner Kailash and Shivling.

16. In view of the fact that number of big projects are coming up in Satluj basin and in the year 1988, 1993,1997, 2000 and 2005 devastating floods were observed in river Satluj, therefore study on cumulative impact is required and Disaster management plan should be prepared.

Project Proponent informed that disaster management plan shall be prepared.

17. 2 % royalty should be given as per Gov. Of India National Hydro-Power policy 2008. Whereas instead of this in EIA/EMP only 100 unit free powers for 10 years has been mentioned. Provision of 2 % royalty should be made in R &R plan.

The state Govt. has ruled for 1 % royalty as per its norms.

18. As per Himachal Pradesh hydro power policy 2006 provision 15 % release of water from the dam and to provide 70 % employment to the Himachali’s have not been mentioned in EIA/EMP.

A team from National institute of Hydrology, Roorkee will be conducting mathematical modelling for assessment of Environmental flow in April 2010.

19. The detail of transmission line is not mentioned in EIA/EMP plan. It is also not mentioned whether there will be separate transmission line or it will be transmitted through integrated transmission line and separate environmental clearance will be obtained for transmission land.

EIA/EMP has been prepared on the bases of per TOR approved by MoEF. Further it was clarified by project as per GoI Regulation power evacuation line for above 250 MW HEPs has to be made by PGCIL. Henceforth PGCIL will make the

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 4

S. No. Issues Raised Remarks on the issue raised

line and take appropriate environment clearances and inform HPPCL accordingly.

20. In case the project is sold/transferred to any other company in such case fresh NOC of Gram Panchayat should be obtained.

Project Proponent clarified that this project will not be sold/ transferred to any other company.

21. Definition of main project affected family is not in accordance to the R&R policy of 2007 of Govt. of India.

It is as per R&R approved by HP State Govt. vide letter No. Rev. (PC) A (10)-7/2008 dated 19.01.2009.

22. Base line date of Air quality of the area is mentioned in EIA/EMP but prediction of enhancement of Air pollution has not been given and impact on flora-fauna is also not mentioned in EIA/EMP.

Necessary action will be taken during construction period.

23. Construction of tunnels and blasting operation will have adverse impact on water sources, is not mentioned in EIA/EMP and how it will be compensated should be made clear.

A committee comprising of members of Project Proponent, IPH, revenue and representative of concerned Panchayat will be constituted and documentation including videography/ photography of the existing water sources shall be carried out, before starting the construction work. In case of reduction observed in the flow of water, it shall be compensated by the project proponent.

24. Compensation for enquiring land should be through negotiation.

The Project Proponent agreed for negotiation.

25. Which area will be developed under CAT plan is not mentioned. Implementation of CAT plan should be prepared on annual basis and Implementation of CAT plan should be under taken consultation of local people/Panchayat.

It was clarified by the Project Proponent that on page No. 2.21 o table 2/9 of EMP report detail of annual budget has been given. Implementation CAT plan is to be done by forest department.

26. Health survey of workers should be conducted. Agreed by the Project Proponent. 27. 25 % employment should be given to the local

people. Employment will be provided to the local people in accordance to the notification of H.P. Government.

28. All males above the age of 18 years should be treated a separate family and should be incorporated in R & R plan. As forest produce is likely to be destroyed due to construction of project, therefore, families which are depending upon forest produce for their livelihood should also be added in project affected families.

Project Proponent informed that there is no such provision in R & R plan approved by the State Govt.

29. Due to submergence of sand / grits quarry in the project local people should be provided sand/grits and it should be made available through for next 40 years and there should be agreement between local people and project proponent.

Project Proponent assured to give only free sand grit to construct two rooms to one family.

30. RCC structure should be provided along the banks of reservoir in order to avoid land slide.

Project Proponent agreed to provide RCC structure along the banks of reservoir.

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 5

Attendance Public hearing conducting by H.P. State Pollution Control Board dated 28/7/2009 at 11:00 AM at Village Powari (Near Barrage Axis) in respect of Shongtong- Karchham HEP (450 MW).

Sr. No. Name and Designation Address Signature 1 Sh. H.R Chauhan (ADM) ADM Pooh, district-Kinnaur Signed 2 S.G. Negi E.D. (Personnel) HPPCL Signed 3 JD Sharma Dy.GM, staff of R/Peo HPPCL Signed 4 Er. Ajeet Kumar AEE,PCB Rampur Signed 5 S.K. Justu DTDO Shimla Signed 6 L.R. Sharma Deptt of social sciences UHF Nauni

Solan Signed

7 Dr. Kewal Kishan, JO R&R IKHEP HPPCL R/Peo Signed 8 Er. H.R.Jaswal SKHEP HPPCL R/Peo Signed 9 Er. SS Negi DISST- R/Peo Signed 10 Er. T.R. Kapoor,Sr. Manager SKHEP HPPCL R/Peo Signed 11 Er. J.R. Kaundal Xen IPH R/Peo Signed 12 Er. R.C. Sr.Xen SKHEP,HPPCL R/Peo Signed 13 Dr. S.K. Tyagi Addl. Chief scientists to WAPCOS Signed 14 S.M. Dixit Er. WAPCOS Signed 15 B.S. Patyal District. Agriculture Officer Kinnaur Signed 16 S.S. Mohta Deputy Director--- District Kinnaur Signed 17 Deepak Kapil Assistant Engineer HPPWD---- Signed 18 B.S. Mohta Chairman, Sangharsh Samiti Signed 19 D.S Negi President Signed 20 Jagat Pal Pradhan gram Panchayat Member Signed 21 Jiya Lal Negi Vishnu-Narayan Committee.

Resident & Abyudaya Parivar Signed

22 Smt. Surma Devi Vice Chairman P/S Kalpa Signed 23 Bhag Phowal Daas V.P.O. Kalpa Signed 24 Vidya Lal P.o Kalpa Signed 25 Hari Chand Signed 26 R.s. Negi R/Peo Signed 27 Vimal Kumar V.P... Rocha Signed 28 Vidya Dhayat Roghi Signed 29 Pal Singh ----- Signed 30 Sita Ramveer Y.P.O Barang Signed 31 Puran singh Val Powari (karorh nag) Kalpa Signed 32 Ramangan singh -d0- Signed 33 Durga Chand V.P.O. Purbani , Kalpa, Kinnaur Signed 34 Furden Negi V.P.O. Roghi Tehsil Kalpa Signed 35 Krishan chand V.P.O.Roghi Tehsil Kalpa Signed 36 Arun Kumar V.P.O. Roghi Signed 37 Dev Kumar V.P.O.Roghi Signed 38 Ram Pal Singh V.P.O. Roghi Signed 39 Bal Krishan V.P.O. Pusbani Signed 40 Ram Singh Negi V.P.O. Shongtong tehsil Kalpa

district Kinnaur Signed

41 Ram Singh V.P.O. Kalpa Tehsil Kalpa Signed 42 Jai Singh V.P.O. Powari Signed 43 Narjeet, village- kelingi Kelingi Signed 44 Khayali Ram Village Braihings Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 6

45 Sohan Lal Village- Nalingi Signed 46 Rajeev Powari Signed 47 Suresh Powari Signed 48 Jai kasha Dune Signed 49 Diva Pulsar Kalpa Signed 50 Devi Dais Kaplan Signed 51 Mahesh Kumar Negi Khawangi Signed 52 Vidya Singh Kalpa Signed 53 Braga Ram Shuddering Signed 54 Bandana Kumara Shuddering Signed 55 Yavapai Ram Shuddering Signed 56 Gang Dev Shuddering Signed 57 Purushotam Lal V.P.O. Mebar Signed 58 A.V. Negi Village –Powari Signed 59 Ram Krishan VPO Poware Kailash Nagar Signed 60 Subhash Chand Village- Powari Kailash Nagar Signed 61 Devang Sanam Shudarang Signed 62 Pradeep Kumar Shudarang Signed 63 Anil Kumar Powari (Kailash Nagar) Signed 64 Dalip Kumar -do- Signed 65 Sanjay Kumar -do- Signed 66 Narang -do- Signed 67 Sanjeev kumar -do- Signed 68 Lekh Raj -do- Signed 69 Virender Kumar -do- Signed 70 Narendera Kumar R/o Tangling Kinnaur Signed 71 Mukesh Kumar D/O Signed 72 Krishan Dev Negi -do- Signed 73 Langu Devi -do- Signed 74 Chander Mohan -do- Signed 75 Hukum Singh -do- Signed 76 Raj kumar -do- Signed 77 Gautam Negi V.P.O. Powari ,Kinnaur Signed 78 Raj Bhagat -do- Signed 79 Jyoti Duni Signed 80 Darshan Daas Tangling Signed 81 Raghu Lal -do- Signed 82 Pyare Lal -do- Signed 83 Madan sukh V.P.O Powari Signed 84 Labin Singh V.P.O. Powari Signed 85 Girish Kumar G.P. Shudharang Signed 86 Ganga Chand V.P.O. Shudharang Signed 87 Parshotam Lal Signed 88 Baldev Singh V.P.O. Tangling Signed 89 Ravinder Bisth V.P.O – Powari Signed 90 Deepak Negi Khawangi Signed 91 Cherring Lal V.P.O. Kalpa Signed 92 Ager Sain V.P.O. Kalpa Signed 93 Roshan Chand V.P.O Kalpa Signed 94 Ram Daas V.P.O Kalpa Signed 95 Dault Singh V.P.O. Kalpa Signed 96 Prem Bhagat V.P.O Powari Signed 97 Amar Daas V.P.O Powari Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 7

98 Amit Kumar V.P.O Powari Signed 99 Chatter Singh V.P.O Powari Signed 100 Suraj Singh V.P.O Powari Signed 101 Raj Kumar V.P.O Tangling Signed 102 Mohan Kumar V.P.O Powari Signed 103 Shyam Singh V.P.O Tangling Signed 104 Ram Prakash V.P.O Tangling Signed 105 Vidya Devi V.P.O Tangling Signed 106 Jai Ram V.P.O Tangling Signed 107 Raj Kumar V.P.O Tangling Signed 108 Vidya Sagar V.P.O Tangling Signed 109 Krishan V.P.O Tangling Signed 110 Higen Narnu V.P.O Tangling 111 Vinod Kumar V.P.O. Tangling Signed 112. Ramesh Chand Powari Signed 113. Santu Lal Powari Signed 114. Kishori Lal Powari Signed 115. Set Ram Tangling Signed 116. Kailash Chand Kalpa Signed 117. Gulab Singh Powari Signed 118. Uday Singh Powari Signed 119. Heera Das Powari Signed 120 Roshni Powari Signed 121 Bhag Negi Powari Signed 122 Vir Bhadra Powari Signed 123 Brij Kumar Powari Signed 124 Dalip Kumar Powari Signed 125 Sher Singh Tangling Signed 126 Sarjan dass Powari Signed 127 Balvir Singh Powari Signed 128 Yagbar Powari Signed 129 Malchand Powari Signed 130 Chhering Dorje Tangling Signed 131 Vidya Krishan Powari Signed 132 Sandeep Kumar Powari Signed 133 Jai Chand Powari Signed 134 Sher Singh Tangling Signed 135 Jasbir Singh Up-Pradhan, Village -Khawangi Signed 136 Rajkumar Up-Pradhan, Village -Khawangi Signed 137 Shyam Lal Up-Pradhan, Village -Khawangi Signed 138 Vidya Dev Khawangi Signed 139 Shiv Lal Khawangi Signed 140 Jogdhyan Khawangi Signed 141 Rajeev Kumar Khawangi Signed 142 Raj Kumar Khawangi Signed 143 Jitender Singh Khawangi Signed 144 Mukesh Kumar Khawangi Signed 145 Kapil Dev Khawangi Signed 146 Rattan Prakash Khawangi Signed 147 Ramesh Kumar Tangling Signed 148 Ved Prakash Tangling Signed 149 Raj Kumar Tangling Signed 150 Jaivant Kailash Nagar, Talanpri/ Powari Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 8

151 Gumnegi Talanpri/Powari Signed 152 Kamla Devi Kailash Nagar, Talampi Signed 153 Yez Ulepa Kailash Nagar, Powari Signed 154 Kamla Devi Kailash Nagar, Talampi Signed 155 Narkumar Khawangi Signed 156 Budh Raj Khawangi Signed 157 Madan Powari Signed 158 Vidya Prakash Kalpa Signed 159 Dinesh Kumar Powari Signed 160 Som Krishan Tangling Signed 161 Jeet Ram Powari Signed 162 Phiv Ram Negi Pradhan GP. Powari Signed 163 Prem Devi Tangling Signed 164 Sidhu Devi Tangling Signed 165 Bhagat Ram Tangling Signed 166 Anil Kumar Powari Signed 167 Narpur Powari Signed 168 Nagender Singh Powari Signed 169 Narchhan Sikh Powari Signed 170 Saneer Mani Powari Signed 171 Naveel Kumar AE, HPPCL, SKHEP Signed 172 Pushp Raj Thakur AE SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 173 Prem Prakash Powari Signed 174 Heera Singh Powari Signed 175 Sanjeev Kumar JE SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 176 Durender Kumar JE SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 177 Sanjay Kumar SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 178 Mukesh Rom Dhare App. R&R, SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 179 Yashwant Singh (Clerk) SKHEP, HPPCL Signed 180 S K Shandil AEE PCB Rampur Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 9

Details of issues raised during Public Hearing on 29.07.2009 at 11:00 AM for proposed Shongtong-Karchham HEP (Powari-Ralli), organized by H. P. State Pollution Control Board at village Ralli, Tehsil Kalpa, district Kinnaur H.P.:

S. No. Issues Raised Remarks on the issue raised

1. Dust from the construction of project is likely to pose serious health problems and will cause damage to orchards and crops which has not been indicated in EIA/EMP report. solution to this problem should be indicated in EIA/EMP

Mitigation measure to control dust due to construction of project have been suggested in EIA/EMP report, which has been assured by the project proponent to be implemented, so that water/air quality is kept within the prescribed norms and there is no damage to the orchards/crops and to the health of local people.

2. Two stone crushers are proposed to be established by the HPPCL. Mebar and Ralli villagers will be mostly affected. These villages should be properly compensated by the project proponent in case of damage caused by establishing stone crusher.

Project Proponent has assured that pollution control measured as prescribed in EPA, 1986 shall be provided so as to keep pollution within the prescribed limit in case any damage is caused due to construction of project it shall be compensated by the project proponent.

3. Muck should be dumped in proper and safe place adequately away from HFL.

Project Proponent clarified that muck will be dumped in safe designated dumping sites away from HFL and with adequate safe engineering structure so that there is no seepage of muck into river.

4. Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) should be used for construction of underground works so that there is minimum damage in the project area.

It was assured by project proponents that if technically, it is possible, TBM can be used.

5. Due to submergence of sand/grits quarry in the project local people should be provide sand/grits and it should damage available through for next 40 years and there should be agreement between local people and project proponent.

Project proponent assured give only once free sand and grit to construct two rooms to one family.

6. Provision for 2% royalty should be made in R&R plan as per Govt. of India National Hydel Power policy 2008.

Project Proponent informed that this issue is under consideration of state govt.

7. There are two water sources above villages Mebar and Ralli which are used for drinking as well as for irrigation. These sources are at the height of 10-11 thousand feet which is likely to be damaged due to construction of surge shaft. The project proponent should give in writing to provide water for drinking as well as for irrigation in case these sources are damaged due to construction of project.

A committee comprising of members of Project Proponent, IPH, revenue and representative of concerned Panchayat will be constituted and documentation including Videography/ photography of the existing water sources shall be carried out, before starting the construction work. In case of reduction observed in the flow of water, it shall be compensated by the Project proponent.

8. Compensation for enquiring land should be through negotiation by Deputy Commissioner Kinnaur.

Project Proponent agreed for negotiation.

9. Workers from other state employed in this project should not be allowed to vote in the elections.

Additional Magistrate informed that as per constitution of India, voting right can be exercised at only one place.

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 10

Attendance for Environmental Public Hearing Environment Public Hearing conducted by HP State Pollution Control Board on 29/07/2009 at 11.00 AM at Village Ralli (Near Power House in respect of Shongtong Karchham, Hydro-Electric Project (450 MW). S. No. Name & designation Address Signature 1 Sh. Hirdaya Ram ADM Pooh Signed 2 Sh. S.G. Negi ED (Personnel) HPPCL Signed 3 Er. J.D. Sharma DGM, Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 4 Sh. Ajeet Kumar Negi Environment Engineer, PCB, Rampur Signed 5 Sh.T.R. Kapoor Sr. Mgr. Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 6 Er. H.R. Jaswal Sr. Mgr. Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 7 Er. R.C. Pajiala Sr. Mgr. Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 8 Dr. L.R. Sharma Prof. Economics, UHF, Nauni Signed 9 Dr. S.S. Tyagi Addl. Chief Scientist, WAPCOS Signed 10 Sh. S.M. Dixit Engineer, WAPCOS Signed 11 Er. P.R. Thakur AE (Civil), Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 12 Dr. Kewal Krishan, JO (R&R), Integrated Kashang, HEP Signed 13 Sh.Mukesh Ramdhari, App.(R&R), Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 14 Sh.Sanjeev Kumar Shongtong Karcham, HEP Signed 15 Sh.S.K. Justa DTDO Shimla Signed 16 Dr. S.S. Negi RH Recong Peo Signed 17 Sh. Deepak Kapil AE, HPPWD, Karcham at Tapri Signed 18 Sh. Radha Krishan Village Maber Signed 19 Sh. Nergh Sai Village Maber Signed 20 Sh.Rajan Singh Village Maber Signed 21 Sh. Ram Guru Village Maber Signed 22 Gobind Singh Village Maber Signed 23 Sh. Parshotam Lal Village Maber Signed 24 Sh. Sita Ram Negi Village Barang, Kinnaur Signed 22 Bugyam Singh Village Maber Signed 23 Sh. Vinay Singh Village Maber Signed 24 Sh. Hari Krishan Village Maber Signed 25 Sh. Parveen Kumar Village Maber Signed 26 Sh. Bhupender Singh Village Maber Signed 27 Sh. Jawala Singh Village Maber Signed 28 Sh. Daulat Ram Village Maber Signed 29 Sh. Prem Singh Village Maber Signed 30 Sh. Bahadur Singh Village Maber Signed 31 Sh. Shyam Bhagat Village Ralli Signed 32 Smt. Gian Kumari. Village Ralli Signed 33 Sh. Jagat Ram Village Ralli Signed 34 Sh.Jar35 Dass Village Ralli Signed 35 Sneh Sheelja Village Ralli Signed 36 Sh. Sug Jew Village Ralli Signed 37 Smt. Kundal DEvi Village Ralli Signed 38 Smt. Bhagwan Devi Village Ralli Signed 39 Smt. Dev Kumari Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 40 Smt. Naina Devi Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 41 Smt. Dev Bhakti Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 42 Sanam Sharma Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 43 Basanti Negi Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 11

S. No. Name & designation Address Signature 44 Smt. Suraj Kumari Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 45 Smt. Maya Devi Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 46 Smt. Sunder Kumari Village & PO Maber (Ralli) Signed 47 Sh. Jiya Lal Negi President ABYUDAYA Parivar, Rekong

Peo Signed

48 Sh .Harish Chander Ranger Officer, Wild Life Keylong Signed 49 Sh. Bisnudhar Chauhan Forest Guard, Sorang Signed 50 Sh. Radham Chand Village Maber Signed 51 Sh. Ramesh Negi Village Maber Signed 52 Sh. Kapil Village Maber Signed 53 Sh. Dev Ktrishan Village Maber Signed 54 Smt. Krishan Bhagti Village Maber Signed 55 Sh. Snt Ram Village Maber Signed 56 Sh. Tara Chand Village Maber Signed 57 Sh. Kundan Lal Village Maber Signed 58 Sh. Dinesh Kumar Village Maber Signed 59 Sh. Paravanta Singh Village Maber Signed 60 Sh. Manohar Singh Village Maber Signed 61 Sh. Ram Swaroop Village Maber Signed 82 Sh. Sadhu Ram Village Maber Signed 63 Sh. Atma Ram Village Maber Signed 64 Sh. Devinder Singh Village Maber Signed 65 Sh.Kirshan Kumar Village Maber Signed 66 Sh.Bisnan SinghNegi Village Maber Signed 67 Sh. Moti Lal Village Maber Signed 68 Sh.Sahi Ram Village Maber Signed 69 Sh. Rajinder Singh Village Maber Signed 70 Sh. Jai Kumar Village Maber Signed 71 Gita Ram Village Maber Signed 72 Sh. Narain Dasss Village Maber Signed 73 Sh. Jintender Kumar Village Maber Signed 74 Smt. Krishana Devi Village Maber Signed 75 Smt. Sewa Mani Village Maber Signed 76 Smt. Mohini Village Maber Signed 77 Sh. Raj Laxmi Village Maber Signed 78 Smt. Rameshwari Village Maber Signed 79 Smt. Urmila Village Maber Signed 80 Smt. Sushila Village Maber Signed 81 Smt. Raj Kumari Village Maber Signed 82 Smt Kezar Dolma Village Maber Signed 83 Smt. Naarain Devi Ex-

President Village Maber Signed

84 Smt. Lojer Palmo Village Maber Signed 85 Sh. Bhajan Singh Negi Village Maber Signed 86 Sh. Partap Singh Negi, Up-

Pradhan Village Maber Signed

87 Sh. Vidya Prakash Village Maber Signed 88 Sh. Kapesh Kumar Village Maber Signed 89 Sh. Jeevan Village Maber Signed 90 Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Village Maber Signed 91 Sh. Vidya Krishan Village Purmi Signed 92 Sh. Ashok Kumar Village Purmi Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

WAPCOS Center for Environment 18- 12

S. No. Name & designation Address Signature 93 Sh. Rich Prakash Village Maber Signed 94 Smt. Vidya Devi Village Maber Signed 95 Smt. Rita Village Maber Signed 96 Smt. Prem Devi Village Maber Signed 97 Sh. Amit Kumar Village Maber Signed 98 Sh. Yashwant Singh Shongtong Katrcham, HEP Signed 99 Sh. S.K. Shandil AE, PCB Rampur Signed

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Annexure 18.1 Public Consultation details, NOC and other correspondence letters

PUBLIC CONSULTATION WITH KHAWANGI PANCHAYAT fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@Mh0th0,e0@jk0,oa iq0@08 &2732&36 fnukad%22@01@09 lsok esa] iz/kku xzke iapk;r [kokaxh rgfly dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ fo”k;%& ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 402 eS0 ok0 ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk vukifÙk izek.k i= tkjh

djus ckjs A egksn;] t; fgUn ! mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa vkids dk;kZy; ls ekaxks ds fooj.k laCkU/kh i= fnukad 12-01-09 dks gekjs dk;kZy; dks iszf”kr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa 4-01-09 dh xzke lHkk esa izLrko ikfjr dj ekaxksa dk fooj.k fn;k x;k gS A bl lanHkZ esa ge vkils fuosnu djuk pkgrs gSa fd ekax la[;k 1]3]4]5]7]8]9 ds fy, ÅtkZ fuxe ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 402 eS0 ok0 us ykMk esa ,d djksM #0 dh jkf’k mik;qDr fdUUkkSj ds ikl tek djokbZ gS A vr% bl fo”k; esa mik;qDr egksn; ls lEidZ djsaA vki dh ekax la[;k 2 esa vki us jsrk ctjh eqQr nsus ckjs fy[kk Fkk] ftlds fy, ÅtkZ fuxe esa dksbZ izko/kku ughaa gS A ekax la[;k 6 jkstxkj ds fo”k; esa jkgr ,oa iquokZl ;kstuk esa bldk o.kZu fd;k x;k gS A ekax la[;k 10 ds fo”k; ij ‘kh?kz gh ¼Qjojh ekg½ fofM;ks xzkQh@ QksVksxzkQh djokbZ tk,xhA ekax la[;k 11 ds lanHkZ esa 100 ;wfuV fctyh nsus dk izko/kku jkgr ,oa iquokZl ;kstuk esa n’kkZ;k x;k gSA vr% vkils fuosnu gS fd bu lHkh ckrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ds ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 402 eS0 ok0 ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds fy, vukifÙk izek.k i= tkjh djus dh d`ik djsa A /kU;kokn lfgr ! Hkonh; mi&egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ ewyizfr ij ugha] izfrfyfi%&

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

1- egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ fg0iz0ÅtkZ fuxe VqVhdaMh f’keyk&5 dks xzke iapk;r [kokaxh ds ekax i= lfgr lwpukFkZ izsf”kr gS A

2- eq[; lkekftd ,oa jkgr]iquokZl fo’ks”kK fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer mÙke Hkou utnhd 103 lqjax dks xzke iapk;r [kokaxh ds ekax i= lfgr lwpukFkZ izsf”kr gS A

3- ofj”B izcU/kd ¼ofj”B v/kh”kklh vfHk;Urk½ u0 1o 2 ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ dks [kokaxh dh ekax i= lfgr lwpukFkZ izsf”kr gS A

mi&egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼402 eSa0 ok0½ dslh0ifjlj fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786-222303 QSDl u0& 223174

u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@’kkS0d0,p0bZ0ih0@R&R-3 @09&1819-23 fnukad% 27-08-2009

lsok esa] iz/kku xzke iapk;r [kokaxh rgfly dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ fo”k;%& vukifÙk izek.k i= tkjh djus ckjs A egksn;] mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa vkt fnukad 22-08-09 dks xzke iapk;r [kokaxh ds

iz/kku ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds inkf/kdkfj;ksa ds lkFk v|ksgLrk{kjh ¼miegkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe

¼iksokjh jYyh 402 eSa0 ok0½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk½ dh cSBd bl dk;kZy; esa gqbZ] ftlesa vukifÙk

izek.k iz= fuxe dks tkjh djus ckjs fofHkUu eqn~nksa ij ppkZ dh xbZ ftldk fooj.k fuEufyf[kr

gS%&

fnukad 11-08-09 dks la?k”kZ desVh }kjk tks ekax i= fn;k x;k Fkk ml lanHkZ esa miegkizcU/kd

}kjk fuEu fVIi.kh dh xbZ %&

ekax la[;k 1& i;kZoj.k ,oa Qlyksa ds ifj;kstuk fuek.kZ dh otg ls gq, uqdlku dh HkjikbZ

vkdyau gksus ij iksokjh ¼rkaxfyax½ xkao ds leku dh tk,xh A

ekax la[;k 2]3]4& ÅtkZ fuxe us igys gh R & R ;kstuk ds rgr Li”Vhdj.k fd;k x;k gSA

ekax la[;k 5& 2 % jk;YVh dk dkuwu tc Hkh jkT; ljdkj ykxw djsxh bls vey esa yk;k

tk,xk A

ekax la[;k 6& 100 ;wfuV fu’kqYd ÅtkZ ds fy, funs’kd e.My us igys gh 16 lw=h; ekax

i= esa lgefr trkbZ gS A

ekax la[;k 7& bl lanHkZ esa tkap iMrky dj mfpr dk;Zokgh dh tk,xh A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

ekax la[;k 8& fuxe }kjk ifj;kstuk iw.kZ gksus ij losZ dj nq”izHkkoksa dk vkdyau fd;k tk,xk

A

ekax la[;k 9& fuxe }kjk dsz’kj IykaV tgka Hkh LFkkfir fd;k tk,xk ml ckjs voxr djk;k

tk,xk A

ekax la[;k 10& ds lanHkZ esa funs’kd e.My us 16 lw=h; ekax ij igys gh lgefr trkbZ gS

ftldh izfrfyfi vkidks izsf”kr dh tk pqdh gS A

ekax la[;k 11& fofM;ksxzkQh dk dk;Z izxfr ij gS bls ‘kh?kz iwjk fd;k tk,xk A

ekax la[;k 12& HkwL[kyu jksdus ds fy, dkjxj dne mBk;s tk;xsa A

ekax la[;k 13& bldk fuek.kZ LFkkfu; {ks= fodkl izkf/kdj.k ds rgr djok;k tk,xk A

dze’k%

vr% bu leLr ckrksa dks eÌsutj j[krs gq, xzke iapk;r [kokaxh ls fouez fuosnu

fd;k tkrk gS fd xkze iapk;r ifj;kstuk fuekZ.k ds fy, ‘kh?kz vukifÙk izek.k i= tkjh djsa A

/kU;kokn lfgr A

Hkonh; layXu%& fodkl desVh dk ekax i= mi&egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks izfrfyfi%&

1- izcU/k funs’kd] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer fgeQSM Hkou] VwVhdaMh iatjh f’keyk&5 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

2- funs’kd ¼flfoy½] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer fgeQSM Hkou] VwVhdaMh iatjh f’keyk&5 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

3- dk;Zdkjh funs’kd ¼dkfeZd½ ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer fgeQSM Hkou] VwVhdaMh iatjh f’keyk&5 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

4- eq[; lkekftd ,oa vkj0 ,.M vkj0 fo’ks”kK mÙke Hkou Mksxjk ykWt utnhd 103 lqjax f’keyk& 4 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

mi&egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Agreement An agreement made this the 10th day of Sept. in the year two thousand nine between the H.P.P.CL. through its D.G.M., SKHEP, HPPCL Reckong Peo, District. Kinnaur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the “First party” of the First Party and the villagers of Village Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, District. Kinnaur, H.P. through their representative namely

1. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Khawangi Sh. Rishi Ram 2. Up-Pradhan Gram Panchayat Khawangi Sh. Jasvir 3. Pradhan Sangrash Samiti Khawangi Sh. Rattan Prakash

(Hereinafter referred to as the “the Second party”) of the Second Part. Whereas the first party (HPPCL) has applied for issue the NOC to the villagers of village Khawangi (Second Party) for construction of Shongtong Karchham Hydro Electric Project. And whereas the above matter was put up before the Board of Director (BOD) in the 17th meeting held on 10-06-2009 at Shimla. The Board of Directors has accepted the following demands. S.N. Name of Work Description Allotment of funds to Panchayats for

construction of roads. BOD has approved partial funds @ Rs. 3.00 Crores for Powari Panchayat and Rs. 2.5 Crores each for Khawangi, Barang and Mebar Panchayats for the proposed roads. The length of road should be specific. Roads would be constructed by PWD and request would be made for the inclusion of these roads in any scheme like Boarder Area Programme or TSP. HPPCL’s liability would be limited to Rs. 10.50 Crores only.

2. Rehabilitation of drinking water sources or Irrigation scheme that may damage or affected due to project activities

BoD has decided to allocate a sum of Rs. 5.00 Crores for the rehabilitation of drinking water sources or Irrigation scheme that may damage or affected due to project activities. HPPCL will restore any damage due to project activities.

3. Adequate compensation, if the specific production in the area is directly affected due to the project construction activities during project construction period.

BoD assured adequate compensation, if the specific production in the area is directly affected due to the project construction activities during project construction period, the farmer would be compensated as proposed, previous 5 years production would be seen. Suitable provision in the EMP will be made.

4. Unused land be returned The Board agreed to return the unused land to the Panchayats for common use.

5. People should be allowed to choose land on lease or permanent acquisition.

BoD has agreed for taking land by the Corporation either on lease or permanently for the project, which is not required for main project components.

6. Seismograph is installed at each Panchayat.

BoD has agreed to install a Seismograph at each Panchayat to assess the impact of blasting. However, it was decided that if need be a consultant may be engaged and in case of any dispute the State Govt.’s order will be final.

7 Yearly grant in lieu of income from collection of minor forest produce from forest which is acquired by the project

BoD has agreed to the proposal that the villagers be given yearly grant in lieu of minor forest produce to compensate for their earning from Forest land acquired by the project.

8 In employment preference should be given to project Affected Families thereafter people residing in project

BoD has agreed to give preference to the people from the project Affected area I following order:- First preference to Project Affected Families, second

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Affected Area and Zone. preference to people residing In project area in general and third preference to the people residing in project affected zone. This wills however, be subject to the candidates meeting the written test. The preference will only be given at the time of interview.

9 100 units free power be given to each and every family in the affected Panchayats.

BoD has agreed to give 100 units free power for 10 years as proposed to each and every family, whose livelihood is affected due to project activities.

10 Any damage or loss to the house due to blasting and natural calamities should be compensated by the project authorities.

BoD has agreed to compensate for any damage to building or land/property or loss during the project construction period for properties located very close to the project works where blasting is taking place without going into the issue whether this is due to blasting or natural calamities. However, this will be only for properties located close to the blasting areas where blasting can have impact. This unconditional facility will be give only during project construction period and not after that.

11 Land for people becoming landless due to land acquisition.

BoD has agreed to take care of the landless persons by providing land in accordance with the provisions of the R&R plan.

12 Sand and grit at project cost for construction of house be provided.

BoD has agreed to give sand and grit for construction of house of up to two rooms, only one time per family to those project affected families, whose sand and grit sources are either taken over or damaged by the project.

13 Some specific irrigation and water supply schemes to each Panchayat.

BoD has agreed to give irrigation/ water supply scheme up to Rs.50.00 lacs per Panchayat for the four project affected panchayats i.e. involving an expenditure of total of Rs. 2.00 Crore. However, this amount shall be released to the integrated with the normal program of IPH.

Dumping areas be properly protected.

BoD agreed to ensure for proper protection of dumping area so that there is no damage to their land or water sources.

15. Reconstruction of some crematorium and temple.

BoD has authorized the MD HPPCL to take up the matter with Deputy Commissioner for construction of crematorium and temples etc. through LADA.

16. One uniform rate for all type of land and all type of locations.

BoD assured that compensation at a rate of Rs. 1.04 lacs per biswa would be acceptable to HPPCL, if this is recommended by negotiation committee and also agreed to by the Deputy Commissioner. This will be given only for the land proposed for acquisition in the Panchayat and will be net amount for land. Only trees and structure will be assessed separately.

Those on the basis of above convents on behalf of the first party the second party i.e. a villagers of village Khawangi have agreed to issue NOC in favour of HPPCL for construction of the Shongtong Karchham Hydro Electric Project. In witness whereof first party and the second party have here in to set their hands the day, month and year first above written:-

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Witness: First Party DGM, STKHEP, HPPCL Rekong Peo District Kinnaur H.P. 2. Deepak Negi Second Party Civil cum CJM Court Kinnaur At Reckong Peo. H.P.

1. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Khawangi 2. Up-Pradhan Gram Panchayat Khawangi

3. Pradhan Sangrash Samiti Khawangi Endst. No. NOSDK-114, dated 10-09-09 Attested SDM Kalpa at Reckong Peo

District Kinnaur H.P.

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

PUBLIC CONSULTATION WITH POWARI PANCHAYAT

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼402 es0 ok0½ dslh0ifjlj fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786-222303 QSDl u0& 223174 vkt fnukad 11-06-09 dks lk;% 4%00 cts Jh ,l0 th0 usxh egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer f’keyk dh v/;{krk esa ,oa bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ mi egkizcU/k ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fjdkax ihvks dh mifLFkfr esa mi egkizcU/k ds dk;Zy; esa ifj;kstuk ds fuekZ.k ds fy, vukifÙk izek.k i= fuxe dks tkjh djus ckjs xzke iapk;rksa o la?k”kZ lfefr;ksa ds lnL;ksa ds lkFk ftyk/kh’k fdUukSj ds dk;kZy; ds lHkkxkj esa cSBd dh xbZ A

fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkjh ,oa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa o la?k”kZ lferh ds izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k A

dz0 la[;k

Ukke Ikn ,oa irk

1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15-

Jh ,l0 th0 usxh bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ Jh oh0 ,l0 esgrk ]] d`”.k nso usxh ]] cynso flag ]] egkchj flag ]]f’ko jke usxh ]] egsUnz flag usxh ]] dsnkj pUn ]] ujsUnz dqekj usxh ]] pUnz ehsgu ]] Kku Hkxr ]] jkt pUnz usxh ]] tlohj flag bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh

egkizcU/k ¼dkfeZd½ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ iz/kku la;qDr la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh] ckjax] escj mi iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr escj mi iz/kku la;qDr la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh] ckjax] escj mi iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh lfpo la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh lnL; la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh lnL; la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh lfpo la?k”kZ lfefr ckjax iz/kku la?k”kZ lehfr ckjax mi iz/kku xzke iapk;r ckjax mi iz/kku xzke iapk;r [kokaxh mi izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½

loZizFke Jh ,l0 th0 usxh egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ us lHkh iapk;r ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds inkf/kdkjh o lnL;ksa dk cSBd esa Hkkx ysus ds fy, /kU;okn fd;k o dk;Zokgh vkjEHk djus dk vkxzg fd;k A rRi’pkr cSBd dh dk;kZokgh vkjEHk dh xbZ o xkze iapk;rkss dh ekaxks dks dzeokj iMk x;k o iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa us viuh ekaxks dks foLrkj iwoZd egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ ds lkFk ppkZ dh A egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ Jh ,l0 th0 usxh us iapk;rksa ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr;ksa dh ekaxksa ij viuh izfrfdz;k ,oa li”Vhdj.k izfrfuf/k;ksa ds le{k izdV dh ,oa vk’oLr fd;k ftldk C;kSjk ekaxokj layXu gS A vUr esa cSBd v/;{k egksn; dks @ ds /kU;okn lfgr lEiu gqbZ A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

mi egkizcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½] ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ,p0bZ0ih0 ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ Ik`”Bkadu la[;k fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fu0 iz0@’kkSa0 d0@jk0 iq0/09 fnukad % izfrfyfi lwpukFkZ ,oa vko’;d dk;Zokgh gsrw izsf”kr %&

1- egkizcU/kd ¼dkfeZd½ fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer fgeQSM Hkou] VwVhd.Mh] f’keyk&5 A 2- ofj”B izcU/kd u0&1,oa II] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fjdkax fivks]

fdUukSj A mi egkizcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½] ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ,p0bZ0ih0 ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ ANNEXURE-2 (Page1-2)

vkt fnukad 01-04-2010 dks izkr% 11%00 cts bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 450 eS0 ok0 dh v/;{krk esa ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds fuek.kZ ds fy, vukifr izek.k i= ckjs esa ifj;kstuk d{k esa xzke iapk;r iksokjh @rkaxfyax ds iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa ds lkFk cSBd gqbZ A fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkjh ,oa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa o la?k”kZ lferh ds izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k A

dz0 la[;k

Ikfj;kstuk vf/kdkjh

Ikn ,oa irk

1- 2- 3- 4-

bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh Jh latho dqekj

egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi& izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ dfu”B vf/kdkjh ¼iquokZl ,oa iquLFkkZiu½

dz0 la[;k

xzke iapk;r iksokjh @rkaxfyax dss izfrfuf/k

1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12-

Jh f’ko jke usxh Jh eghohj flag Jh cynso flag Jh t; flag Jh uxsUnz flag Jh n’kuZ nkl Jh ujnu lq[k Jh d`”.k dqekj Jh T;ksfr izdk’k Jh yQu pUn Jh izse lkxj Jh ujsUnz dqekj

iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjhmi& iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

13- 14-

Jh lur dqekj Jh lqjsUnz flag

loZizFke egkizcU/kd us iapk;r ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa dks ifj;kstuk d{k esa inkjus ij Lokxr fd;kA cSBd esa vk, izfrfuf/k;ksa us 21 lq=h; ekaxksa ds vykok 3 vfrfjDr ekaxksa dks izLrqr fd;k tks fuEu gS %&

1 tc xkao esa lMd cuk;k tk,xk rks fdlh Hkh izdkj dk #dkoV vkus ij HPPCL iz’kklu ,oa yksxksa ls Lo;a ckr djsxk A

2 tc ugj }kjk ikuh yk;k tk,xk rc Hkh fdlh Hkh #dkoV ds fy, HPPCL iz’kklu ,oa yksxksa ls Lo;a ckr djsxk A

3 jsrk [kku ds ckjs%& izfrfuf/k;ksa dk dguk Fkk fd os jsrk [kku ls gj lky 7 ;k 8 yk[k izfro”kZ xkao okys vkenuh izkIr djrs gSa vkSj bl izkIr jkf’k dks xkao okys vkil esa ckaVrs gSa vkSj mudk dguk gzS fd tc ogka ij ifj;kstuk cuk;k tk,xk rks os bl jsrk [kku ls oafpr jg tk,xsa vkSj bl ,sot esa os 3 djksM #i;s dh ekax dj jgs gS A

egkizcU/kd us ekaxks dks lquus ds ckn mifLFkr yksxksa dks vk’oklu fn;k fd os bu ekaxks dks mPp Lrjh; vf/kdkfj;ksa rd ys tk,xsa vkSj ekaxksa dks lqy>kus dh dksf’k’k djsxsa vkSj vUr esa egkizcU/kd us mifLFkr yksxks dk /kU;okn fd;k A iapk;rksa ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr;ksa dh ekaxksa dk C;kSjk ekaxokj layXu gS A ANNEXURE-1(Page 1 to 25) vkt fnukad 29-03-2010 dks izkr% 11%00 cts bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 450 eS0 ok0 dh v/;{krk esa ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds fuek.kZ ds fy, ckjs esa ifj;kstuk d{k esa xzke iapk;r dYik @’kqnkjax ds iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa ,oa fo”k.kq ukjk;.k fodkl desVh ds izfrfuf/k;ksa ds lkFk cSBd gqbZ A fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkjh ,oa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa o fo”k.kq ukjk;.k fodkl desVh ds

izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;kA

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

dz0 la[;k

Ikfj;kstuk vf/kdkjh

Ikn ,oa irk

1- 2- 3- 4-

bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh Jh latho dqekj

egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi& izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ dfu”B vf/kdkjh ¼iquokZl ,oa iquLFkkZiu½

dz0 la[;k

iapk;r dYik @’kqnkjax ds izfrfuf/k

1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12-

Jhefr lqHknzk dqekjh Jh ft;k yky Jh ftrsUnz flag Jh nsoh uj Jh HkkxpUn nkl Jh laxjru Jh f’kon;ky flag Jh ,e0 ,l0 usxh Jh lquhy dqekj Jh fon;k yky Jh iFoh jkt Jh gjfoUnz flag

iz/kku xzke iapk;r ‘kqnkjaxlnL; dYik mi& iz/kku xzke iapk;r dYik Lkfpo fo”k.kq ukjk;.k fodkl desVh dYik lnL; yk0 dYik

loZizFke egkizcU/kd us iapk;r ,oa fo”k.kq ukjk;.k efUnj dYik ds izfrfuf/k;ksa dks ifj;kstuk d{k esa inkjus ij Lokxr fd;kA cSBd esa vk, izfrfuf/k;ksa us viuh ekaxksa dks egkizcU/kd ds le{k izLrqr fd;k vkSj eqnns ,oa ekaxksa dh izfrfyfi egkizcU/kd dks lkSai nh %& izeq[k eqnns tks fuEu gS %&

1 izcU/k funs’kd ds lkFk igys gh Mhy gqbZ Fkh fd dyik ‘kqnkjax ds 438 ifjokjksa dks ifj;kstuk izHkkfor ifjokj esa fy;k tk,xk vkSj fy;k Hkh x;k A blfy, dYik iapk;r us vukifr izek.k i= tkjh fd;k FkkA vkSj ;g {ks= ifj;kstuk izHkkfor {ks= ?kksf”kr fd;k x;k Fkk A

2 vc fcuk fdlh lwpuk ds 438 ifjokjksa dks ifj;kstuk izHkkfor ifjokj ls gVk;k x;k gS A tks fcYdqy Hkh U;k;ksfpr ugha gS A

3 izfrfuf/k;ksa dk dguk gS fd mUgsa nqckjk ls 438 ifjokjksa dks ifj;kstuk izHkkfor ifjokj esa ‘kkfey fd;k tk, vU;Fkk tks vukifr izek.k i= vki dks tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk mls jn fd;k tk,xk A

egkizcU/kd us ekaxks dks lquus ds ckn ogka mifLFkr yksxksa dks vk’oklu fn;k fd os bu ekaxks dks mPp Lrjh; vf/kdkfj;ksa rd ys tk,xsa vkSj ekaxksa dks lqy>kus dh dksf’k’k djsxsa A vkSj egkizcU/kd us mifLFkr yksxks dk /kU;okn fd;k A iapk;rksa ,oa fo”k.kq ukjk;.k efUnj dYik ds izfrfuf/k;ksa dh ekaxksa dk C;kSjk ekaxokj layXu gS A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

ANNEXURE-3

vkt fnukad 01-04-2010 dks lk;% 3%00 cts xzke iapk;r ckjax esa ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 450 eS0 ok0 ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds fuek.kZ ds fy, vukifr izek.k i= ckjs esa cSBd gqbZ A cSBd esa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa] la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa o xkao ds yksxksa vkSj ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds vf/kdkfj;ksa us Hkkx fy;k A fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkjh ,oa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa o la?k”kZ lferh ds izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx

fy;kA

dz0 la[;k

Ikfj;kstuk vf/kdkjh

Ikn ,oa irk

1- 2- 3- 4- 5-

bZvkj0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ bZ0 ih0 lh0 Hkkj}kt bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh Jh latho dqekj

egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ofj”B izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi& izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ dfu”B vf/kdkjh ¼iquokZl ,oa iquLFkkZiu½

dz0 la[;

xzke iapk;r ckjax ds izfrfuf/k

1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10-

Jherh fou;k nsoh Jh jkt pUnz Jh v’kksd dqekj Jh Bkdqj flag Jh jkds’k dqekj Jh lanhi Jh gksf’k;kj flag Jh ‘ke’ksj flag Jh d`”.k yky Jh lUr dqekj

iz/kku xzke iapk;r ckjax mi& iz/kku xzke iapk;r ckjax

loZizFke egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ us iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa] la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa o xkao ds yksxksa dks viuk ijhp; fn;k mlds ckn mu yksxks ds lkFk vukifr

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

izek.k i= ds ckjs esa ppkZ fd;k A ppkZ ds nkSjku izfrfuf/k;ksa us ekax dh fd xkao esa tks ukyk gS mls iwjh rjg iDdk ¼channelized) fd;k tk, vkSj ifj;kstuk fuek.kZ ds nkSjku dUVªksy cykfLaVx dh O;okLFkk dh tk, vkSj flLeksxzkQ LFkkfir fd;k tk, A mifLFkr izfrfuf/k;ksa us egkizcU/kd ls dgk fd vukifr izek.k i= ds ckjs esa fnukad 04-04-2010 dh xzke lHkk esa ppkZ djsxsa vSkj bl dk;Zokgh dh lwpuk vkidks izsf”kr djsxs A vUr esa egkizcU/kd us ogka ij mifLFkr yksxks dk /kU;okn fd;k A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Metting with Gram Sabha members of Powari Panchayat regarding issuence of NOC at O/o General Manager SKHEP, HPPCL, R/Peo.

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxBkSax& djPNe ¼iksokjh jYyh ½ 402 es0 ok0

fnukad 17-12-09 dks nksigj 1 cts Jh r#.k diwj izcU/k funs’kd] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fy0 f’keyk&5 dh v/;{krk esa ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ tyfo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼402 es0 ok0½ ds fuekZ.k o Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ckjs xzke iapk;r iksokjh ds ifjlj esa iapk;r ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds vf/kdkfj;ksa o leLr xzke okfl;ksa ds lkFk lEiUu cSBd dh dk;Zokgh dk fooj.k %& cSBd esa ftu vf/kdkfj;ksa ,oa iapk;r o la?k”kZ lfefr;ksa ds izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k dk fooj.k layXud ¼,½ esa n’kkZ;k x;k gSA dze la[;k

iapk;r@la?k”kZ lfefr ds ekaxks dk fooj.k

fVIi.kh

iapk;r dk uke μ iksokjh 1- Ikksokjh o rkaxfyax xkao dks ifj;kstuk dk;Z

ls foLFkkfir u fd;k tkos o fdlh dkj.k o’k foHkkx dks mijksDr xkao dks fo:Fkkfir djuk iMs ;k ifj;kstuk dk;Z ls fdlh Hkh izdkj dk uqDlku gks tk, rks lEcfU/kr ifjokjksa dks lqjf{kr txg Mh0ih0,Q0@;w0ih0,Q0 esa mlh xkao esa gh fgekpy ljdkj }kjk 5&5 fo?kk Hkwfe rFkk edku iznku fd;k tkos o is;ty] flapkbZ lqfo/kk eqfg;k djkuk rFkk uqDlku dk eqvkotk 100 izfr’kr fn;k tkos A

jkT; ljdkj ds jkgr ,oa iquZokl ;kstuk ds rgr izko/kku gS rFkk uqDlku dk eqvkotk ‘kr&izfr’kr fd;k tk,xk A Mh0 ih0 ,Q0@;w0 ih0 ,Q0 esa ;fn mfpr Hkwfe miyCc/k gksxh rks Hkkjr ljdkj ls vuqefr ysus ds fy, iz;kl fd;k tk,xk A iquZokl ;kstuk vuqlkj ftudk edku tkrk gS mls ?kj cukus ds fy, 250 oxZ ehVj dk iykV nsus dk izko/kku gS tks eqvkots ds vfrfjDr gS t#jr iMus ij foLFkkfir ijhokjksa dks dqN d`f”k ;ksX; Hkwfe Hkh nh tk ldrh gS A

jkM0dkseks ls ugj ikuh dk dqgy cuk dj dkaxjax [kM~M esa Qky fd;k tk;s o dqgy ds lkFk lkFk thi ;ksX; ekZx fuekZ.k fd;k tk, A

lEcfU/kr foHkkx ls ¼flapkbZ o tu LokLF; foHkkx½ dk;Z djokus ds fy, eq0 50]000]00@& #0 dk izko/kku j[kk x;k gS tks fd funs’kd ifj”kn ¼ ch0vks0Mh0½ }kjk vuqeksfnr gS A HPPCL ;g vk’oklu nsrk gS

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fd dqgy dk dk;Z IPH foHkkx }kjk ‘kh?zk iwjk djokus ds iz;kl fd;s tk,xsa A bls ljdkj dh fdlh Hkh ;kstuk esa ‘kkfey fd;k tk,xk rFkk ;fn /ku jkf’k de iMh rks HPPCL }kjk /ku jkf’k miyCc/k djokbZ tk,xh A thi ;ksX; lMd ds ckjs esa Hkh yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx ls ckr dh tk,xh

rkaxfyax xkao ls lryqt fdukjs o lMd ds mijh rjQ iksokjh >wyk ls ‘kqikupks rd de ls de 10 ehVj vkj0 lh0 lh0 nhokj yxk;k tk, A

ekax eku fy;k tk,xk A

mijksDr xkao ds fy, udnh o vU; uqDlku ds ,ot esa 50 yk[k #0 ,d eq’Dr la?k”kZ desVh dks eqgS;k djk;s rkfd udnh Qly ds uqdlku dk eqvkotk xzke okfl;ksa dks udn fn;k tk lds A

funs’kd ifj”kn }kjk lksyg lw=h; vuqeksfnr i= ds dze la[;k ds rgr ekax iwjh dh tk pqdh gS A mDr ekax Hkh fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe izca/ku }kjk utnhd esa uqDlku dk eqvkotk eq0 80]000@& #0 izfr ch?kk nwj ds uqDlku dk eqvkotk eq0 50]000@& #0 izfr ch?kk fu/kkZfjr desVh }kjk vkadyu dj Hkqxrku fd;k tk,xk A ftls iapk;r dks fyf[kr #i fn;k x;k gS A vkt dh cSBd esa xzkeokfl;ksa ds vuqjks/k ij desVh esa iapk;r dk ,d vfrfjDr lnL; euksfur djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k gS A ;g Hkh vk’oklu fn;k x;k gS fd desVh }kjk lHkh cxhpksa dk vkadyu ugha fd;k tk,xk A D;ksafd mlesa vf/kd le; yxsxk A dqN cxhpksa dk vkadyu djds gh ,d vk/kkj cuk;k tk,xk ftl ij HkqXrku gksxk A

la?k”kZ desVh dks xzkeokfl;ksa ds izR;sd o”kZ udnh Qly ds uqDlku ds ,ot esa udn jkf’k nsus gsrw 10]00]000 #0 ifj;kstuk fuekZ.k dk;Z iw.kZ gksus i’pkr gj o”kZ nsuk gksxk o izfr o”kZ 15 izfr’kr o`f} gksuk pkfg, A

uqDlku dk vkadyu orZeku esa desVh }kjk fu/kkZfjr fd;k tk,xk ftls dk;Z ‘kq# gksus ij izfro”kZ Hkqxrku fd;k tk,xk A dk;Z iwjk gksus i’pkr Hkh 2 o”kZ rd vkadyu fd;k tk,xk A

gj ?kj ls de ls de ,d lnL; dks jkgr ,oa iquZokl ;kstuk ds rgr Hkwfeghu

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

ifj;kstuk esa ;ksX;rk vuqlkj ukSdjh fn;k tk, A

ds fy;s izko/kku gS ckfd eq[; izHkkfor ifjokj dks Hkh HkrhZ esa izkFkfedrk nh tk,xh A

iksokjh &rkaxfyax izdk’kadjl ds j[k&j[kko o vU; fuekZ.k dk;Z o cq}efUnj rFkk jke efUnj ds fuek.kZ o vU; [kpksaZ ds fy, ikap ikap yk[k #0 udn fn;k tk, A

mDr ekax dks ykMk ds rgr fy;s tkus dk fu.k;Z fy;k x;k] vxj /ku dh deh gksxh rks ÅtkZ fuxe vfrfjDr /ku eqgS;k djk,xk A

ifj;kstuk dk;Z gsrw xkfM;ka@Bsdk dk;Z ds fy, vko’;drk gks rks izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij LFkkuh; yksxksa dks fn;k tk, A

jkgr ,oa iquZokl ;kstuk esa mDr ekax dks iwjk djus dk mfpr izko/kku j[kk x;k gS rFkk ;g dk;Z izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk,xk A

esfyax[kVk o tkyMax ds fy;s is;ty o flapkbZa gsrw ikuh dk izko/kku fd;k tk, A

mDr ekax ykMk ds rgr iwjh dh tk,xh A

rkaxfyax ls jkaxdkseks rd [kPpj ekxZ fuekZ.k fd;k tk, A

mDr ekax ykMk ds rgr iwjh dh tk,xh A

rkaxfyax >wys ds ikl thi ;ksX; cSyh iqy dk fuekZ.k fd;k tk, o iksokjh xkao ds fy, tks czsdy dEiuh }kjk fuek.kZ ;ksX; iqy dks fdlh izdkj dk uqDlku u gks uqDlku gksus dh lqjr esa fo|qr ifj”kn dks u;k eksVj ;ksX; iqy dk fuekZ.k djuk gksxk A

orekZu esa ‘kkSaxBkSax & iqoZuh lMd djhc ikap fd0 eh0 pkSMk djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k gS vkSj vxj le;kuqlkj iqy dh vko’;drk iMs rks fuekZ.k fd;k tk,xk A

jk”Vªh; jktekZx&22 ‘kkSaxBkSax ls ykunkjax rd jksM iDdk fd;k tk;s A

orekZu esa lMd dks pkSaMk fd;k tk jgk gS rFkk ifj;kstuk dk dk;Z iwjk gksus ij iDdk dj fn;k tk,xk A

gj ehVj xzkgd dks de ls de 100 ;qfuV fctyh xehZ ds fy;s o 200 ;qfuV ifj;kstuk iw.kZ gksus ij fu%’kqyd mijksDr xzkeokfl;ksa dks fn;k tkos A

100 ;qfuV fctyh dk izko/kku jkgr ,oa iquZokl ;kstuk ds rgr ifj;kstuk iw.kZ gksus ds 10 o”kZ rd fd;k x;k gS A blds vfrfjDr orekZu esa ,d izfr’kr fo|qr mRiknu dk izfro”kZ ykMk dks tek fd;k tk,xk tks fd fg0 iz0 ljdkj }kjk vuqeksfnr gS A

chtkunksj ls lryqt unh rd nksuksa rjQ dzsVoky fnokj yxk;k tkos A

vko’;drkuqlkj dSV iyku esa vU;Fkk ÅtkZ fuxe }kjk dzsVoky nhokj yxk;k tk,xk A

dkaxjax ls xksyaxMkuh rd dzsVoky fnokj ifj;kstuk dk dk;Z ‘kq# gksus ds mijkUr

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

yxk;k tkos rkfd LFkkuh; yksxksa dks ifj;kstuk fuekZ.k ds le; iRFkj fxjus ls uqDlku dks #dk;k tk lds A

vko’;drkuqlkj mDr dk;Z dks djok;k tk,xk A

MSe lkbZV dks;kekus ls dkaxjax rFkk fFkFkfj;ksnsu ds fy;s thi ;ksX; lMd dk fuekZ.k fd;k tkos A

funs’kd ifj”kn }kjk eq0 30000000@&¼rhu djksM #0½ mDr dk;Z ds fy;s vuqeksfnr fd;k tk pqdk gS ,oa mDr lMd dk fuekZ.k fg0 iz0 yks0 fu0 fo0 }kjk fdlh Hkh ljdkjh ;kstuk ds rgr djokus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k gS o le; ij iwjk djokus dk mDr foHkkx ls lqfuf’pr fd;k tk,xk A

dduhnsu iksokjh ls nsork efUnj lMd fuekZ.k fd;k tkosA

mDr ekax dks Lohdkj dj fy;k x;k gS

MEihax ,fj;k o Vuy] MSe ds fuekZ.k dk;Z ls xkfM;ksa bR;kfn ds pyus ls i;kZoj.k iznw”k.k ls ckxokuh @ d`f”k dks gksus okys uqDlku ls ,ot esa eq0 1]00]000 #0 ¼,d yk[k #0½ izfr ch?kk ds fglkc ls izfro”kZ ifj;kstuk fuekZ.k rd ckxokuksa@d”kdksa dks feyuk pkfg, A

mDr ekax dz0 la0 4 vkSj 5 esa n’kkZ;k x;k gS A

Hkwfe ekfydks dks Hkwfe gLrkUrj.k tks fuxe }kjk MEihax ds fy;s ysuk gS dks izfr ohLok 1]05]000 #0 ¼,d yk[k ikap gtkj #0½ fn;k tk;s A

mDr ekax funs’kd ifj”kn ds dz0 la0 16 }kjk eq0 1]04]000@& izfr ohLok ds fglko ls eqvkotk Hkqxrku djus dk fu.k;Z fy;k x;k gS ftls fuxe ikyu djsxk A

Ikksokjh iapk;r ds vf/ku ftrus Hkh ifjokj vkrs gSa dks ifj;kstuk ls iw.kZ izHkkfor ekuk tkos A

D;ksfd ou vf/kdkj fu;e ds rgr leLr xzkeokfl;ksa dk ou vf/kxzgu dh otg ls vkthfodk izHkkfor gksrh gS] vr% leLr ifjokj ifj;kstuk izHkkfor ekus tk,xsa vkSj ;g dk;Z ou Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls igys fu;ekuqlkj laHko ugha gS A

‘kkSaxBkSax ls nsork efUnj iksokjh xkao o ‘kkyhpqfuax rd de ls dr 5 fd0eh0 lMd [kqyk o iDdk fd;k tkos bl dk;Z dks djus gsrw Bsdk ;qfu;u ds rgr u djk dj NksVs NksVs Hkkxksa esa ckaV dj LFkkuh;

mDr lMd dk [kqyk djus dk dk;Z yks0 fu0 fo0 ls vukifŸk izek.k i= izkIr djus ds mijkUr djk;k tk jgk gS rFkk iDdk djus dk dke ifj;kstuk iw.kZ gkus ij fd;k tk,xk A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

yksxksa dks Bsds ij dk;Z fn;k tkos A ifj;kstuk dk;Z ‘kq# gksus ls igys iwjs

iksokjh iapk;r ds vf/ku vkus okys lHkh ifjokjksa ds tehu] edku o taxy bR;kfn lHkh dk ohfM;ksxzkQh dj bl dh ,d iSu Mªkbo rS;kj dj la?k”kZ desVh iokjh @rkaxfyax dks lkSai fn;k tkos A

izFke pj.k dh ohfM;kxzkQh dk dk;Z iwjk gks pqdk gS ftldh izfrfyfi iSu MªkbZo ds #i esa la?k”kZ lfefr Loa iapk;r dks vxys ekg rd ns nh tk,xh A vxys pj.k dh ohfM;ksxzkQh dh izfrfyfi le;kuqlkj ns nh tk;sxh A

iokjh iapk;r ds vf/ku tks Hkh ifjokj vkrs gSa dks de ls de nks dejs fdpu o ckFk#e cukus gsrw jsrk ctjh eqQr fn;k tkos A

mDr ekax dks funs’kd ifj”kn ds fu.kZ; ds dze la[;k 12 }kjk eku fy;k x;k gS A

Rkakxfyax Ldwy ls efyax[kksVk ¼MSe lkbZV ls dkaxjax gksrs gq,½ rd thi ;ksX; lMd dk fuekZ.k fd;k tkos A

mDr ekax dze la[;k 16 ds rgr iwjh gks pqdh gS blds vfrfjDr vko’;drk iMus ij lEcfU/kr foHkkx }kjk dk;Z dks iwjk djus dk iz;kl fd;k tk,xk A

izcU/k funs’kd] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer] fgeQsM Hkou VqVhdUMh f’keyk&5

cSBd esa fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkfj;ksa us Hkkx fy;k

1- Jh r#.k diwj izcU/k funs’kd fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe f’keyk 2- bZ0 ch0 ,l0 usxh funs’kd flfoy fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe f’keyk 3- bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ifj;kstuk fjdkax fivks 4- bZ0 vkj0 lh0 ift;kyk ofj”B izcU/kd ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ifj;kstuk fjdkax

fivks 5- bZ0 vuks[kh jke oekZ ofj”B izcU/kd dkjiksjsV eksfuVfjax f’keyk 6- bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh mi&izcU/kd&1 ‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ifj;kstuk fjdkax fivks cSBd esa iapk;r o la?k”kZ lfefr ds fuEufyf[kr izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

1- Jh f’ko jke usxh iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh 2- Jh cynso flag usxh v/;{k la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh 3- y{e.k HkfDr mi&iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh 4- Jh egkohj usxh mik/;{k la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh 5- Jh yQu pUn lnL; xzke iapk;r iksokjh 6- Jh d`”.k flag lnL; xzke iapk;r iksokjh 7- Jh thou flag lnL; xzke iapk;r iksokjh 8- Jh uxsUnz flag ou desVh iz/kku 9- Jh HkwisUnz flag iwoZ iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Meeting with all Concerned Panchayat Members i.e. Khawangi, Maber, Powari, Barang and

Kalpa & Shudharang regarding issuance of NOC, at DC Office R/Peo

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Meeting with all Concerned Panchayat Members i.e. Khawangi, Maber, Powari, Barang and Kalpa &

Shudharang regarding issuance of NOC,

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

ANNEXURE-2 (Page1-2) vkt fnukad 01-04-2010 dks izkr% 11%00 cts bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 450 eS0 ok0 dh v/;{krk esa ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ds fuek.kZ ds fy, vukifr izek.k i= ckjs esa ifj;kstuk d{k esa xzke iapk;r iksokjh @rkaxfyax ds iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa ds lkFk cSBd gqbZ A fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkjh ,oa iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa o la?k”kZ lferh ds izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k A dz0 la[;k

Ikfj;kstuk vf/kdkjh

Ikn ,oa irk

1- 2- 3- 4-

bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k bZ0 ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ bZ0 Mh0 Mh0 usxh Jh latho dqekj

egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ mi& izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ dfu”B vf/kdkjh ¼iquokZl ,oa iquLFkkZiuk½

dz0 la[;k

xzke iapk;r iksokjh @rkaxfyax dss izfrfuf/k

1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14-

Jh f’ko jke usxh Jh eghohj flag Jh cynso flag Jh t; flag Jh uxsUnz flag Jh n’kuZ nkl Jh ujnu lq[k Jh d`”.k dqekj Jh T;ksfr izdk’k Jh yQu pUn Jh izse lkxj Jh ujsUnz dqekj Jh lur dqekj Jh lqjsUnz flag

iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh mi& iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh

loZizFke egkizcU/kd us iapk;r ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa dks ifj;kstuk d{k esa inkjus ij Lokxr fd;kA cSBd esa vk, izfrfuf/k;ksa us 21 lq=h; ekaxksa ds vykok 3 vfrfjDr ekaxksa dks izLrqr fd;k tks fuEu gS %&

1 tc xkao esa lMd cuk;k tk,xk rks fdlh Hkh izdkj dk #dkoV vkus ij HPPCL iz’kklu ,oa yksxksa ls Lo;a ckr djsxk A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

2 tc ugj }kjk ikuh yk;k tk,xk rc Hkh fdlh Hkh #dkoV ds fy, HPPCL iz’kklu ,oa yksxksa ls Lo;a ckr djsxk A

3 jsrk [kku ds ckjs%& izfrfuf/k;ksa dk dguk Fkk fd os jsrk [kku ls gj lky 7 ;k 8 yk[k izfro”kZ xkao okys vkenuh izkIr djrs gSa vkSj bl izkIr jkf’k dks xkao okys vkil esa ckaVrs gSa vkSj mudk dguk gzS fd tc ogka ij ifj;kstuk cuk;k tk,xk rks os bl jsrk [kku ls oafpr jg tk,xsa vkSj bl ,sot esa os 3 djksM #i;s dh ekax dj jgs gS A

egkizcU/kd us ekaxks dks lquus ds ckn mifLFkr yksxksa dks vk’oklu fn;k fd os bu ekaxks dks mPp Lrjh; vf/kdkfj;ksa rd ys tk,xsa vkSj ekaxksa dks lqy>kus dh dksf’k’k djsxsa vkSj vUr esa egkizcU/kd us mifLFkr yksxks dk /kU;okn fd;k A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HIMACHAL PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LIMITED (A – State Government Undertaking) Shongtong-Karchham (Powari-Ralli) HEP (402 MW) K.C. Complex Reckong-

Peo District, Kinnaur (H.P.)-172107 Phone No. 01786-222303 Fax No. 223174 No.HPPCL/DGM-SKHEP/R&R/2009 Dated:- To 1. The Pradhan Sangharsh Samiti, Powari, Tehsil Kalpa, District Kinnaur. Subject: - Panchayats NOC Shongtong-Karchham HEP, Reference: - No.HPPCL/ESMU-4/Shongtong/09-676 dated 22-06-09. Dear Sir, Jai Hind A copy of decision with reference to the meeting held on 02-06-09 with the

Pradhan of gram panchayats/Sangharsh Samiti, in the conference hall of D.C. Office at

Reckong Peo, received from the Managing Director, HPPCL Shimla vide referred to

above is enclosed for your kind information and favorable action in the matter please,

DA:-As above (3 pages) Yours faithfully, Dy. General Manager (SE), Shongtong-Karchham HEP, HPPCL, Reckong Peo, District Kinnaur (HP)

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (A State Government Undertaking)

Shongtong-Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong-Peo Phone: - 01786-223310 Fax:-01786- 223174 Email: - [email protected]

No. HPPCL/GM-SKHEP/R&R-3/10 Dated:- To The Managing Director, HPPCL, Him fed Bhawan Panjari, Tutikandi Shimla-5. Subject: - Resolution No. 13 of Gram Panchayat Powari regarding compensation against minor minerals. R/Sir, Gram Panchayat Powari has submitted a Gram Sabha resolution No. 13

regarding compensation of minor minerals and forest right. In which they have stated

that Gram Sabha wants Rs. 3 Crore as compensation and in addition to this amount

they want payment on account of forest right separately.

The copy of resolution No. 13 is enclosed for reference, please. Thanking you, Yours faithfully,

General Manager, Shongtong-Karchham HEP, HPPCL, Reckong-Peo. Copy to:-

1 The Director Civil HPPCL Shimla Himfed Bhawan Panjari Tutikandi Shimla-5 A/W regulation No. 13 for kind information, please.

2 The Chief Environment Specialist, Uttar Baan, Dora Lodge, Shimla-4 awe regulation No. 13 for kind information, please.

3 The Dy. General Manager, Shongtong-Karchham HEP, HPPCL, Reckong-Peo, for kind information, please.

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼450 eSa0 ok0½ ds0 lh0 ifjlj] fjdkax fivks] ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786-223310 QSDl u0& 223174

cSBd dk C;kSjk

fnukad 25@05@2010 dks lk;% 6%30 cts bZ0 ch0 ,l0 usxh funs’kd ¼flfoy½ dh v/;{krk esa

fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer f’keyk rFkk bZ0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe iksokjh

jYyh dh mifLFkfr esa ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe ¼iksokjh jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk 450 eS0 ok0 ds

fuekZ.k o Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ckjs iksokjh iapk;r ls vukifŸk izek.k i= tkjh djus ckjs ekaxksa ds

fuiVkjs gsrq fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ds foJke x`g utnhd ftyk fpfdRlkY; fjdkaxihvks esa

lEiUu cSBd dk fooj.k %&

loZizFke bZ0 ch0 ,l0 usxh funs’kd flfoy fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer f’keyk us

iapk;r o la?k”kZ lehfr ds izfrfuf/k;ksa dk cSBd esa Hkkx ysus ds fy, /kU;okn fd;k vkSj

lEcfU/kr izfrfuf/k;ksa dks viuk ifjp; fn;k rFkk cSBd dh dk;Zokgh vkjEHk djus dk vkxzg fd;k

A

ekaxks dk fooj.k ,oa fVIi.kh %&

dz0 l0

iapk;r dh Ekakxksa dk fooj.k Ekkaxksa ds fu.kZ; dk fooj.k

1 [kfut lalk/kuksa ¼jsrk ctjh½ ,oa fpyxkstk ds Qly dk eqvkotk eq03 djksM #0 la?k”kZ desVh @ xzke fodkl desVh dks fn;k tk, rkfd nso lHkk desVh iksokjh rakxfyax dks viuh laLd`fr dks cpkus gsrq fn;k tk, A ftls vf/kd ls vf/kd rhu fdLrksa esa fn;k tk, A vxj mijksDr ekax eku

foLrkj ls vkadyu ds i’pkr vxj ekax mfpr ikbZ tkrh gS rks mls mPp vf/kdkfj;ksa ls ekax iw.kZ djus gsrw iz;kl fd;s tk,xs A ftlds fy, ¼vajulars rights½ dh izfrfyfi ,oa xzke lHkk ls tks fd 30@05@10 dks gksuh fuf’pr gqbZ gS esa [kfut lalk/ku ,oa fpyxkstk ds Qlydk izfro”kZ uhykeh dj tks jde vftZr

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

yh tkrh gs rks la?k”kZ lfefr xzkelHkk dks vukifr izek.k i= tkjh djus gsrw flQkfj’k djsxh A

dh tkrh gS tksfd nso lHkk }kjk [kpZ fd;k tkrk gS dks xzkelHkk ls ikfjr dj fuxe dks izsf”kr djsa A

vUr esa cSBd v/;{k egksn; ds /kU;okn izLrko lfgr lEiUu gqbZ A

funs’kd flfoy] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer] fgeQsM Hkou VqVhdUMh f’keyk&5 cSBd essa Hkkx ysus okys izfrfuf/k;ksa ,oa vf/kdkfj;ksa dk fooj.k layXu gS %& cSBd esa fuEufyf[kr vf/kdkfj;ksa us Hkkx fy;k%& 1½ Jh ch0 ,l0 usxh funs’kd flfoy fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer f’keyk 2½ Jh0 ds0 ds0 eygks=k ifj;kstuk izeq[k ¼egkizcU/kd½ ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe 3½ Jh ts0 Mh0 ‘kekZ mi&egkizcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe 4½ Jh f=yksd pUn ‘kekZ ofj”B izcU/kd 5½ Jh ih0 lh0 Hkkj}kt ofj”B izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe 6½ Jh Mh0 Mh0 usxh mi&izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe 7½ Jh lUtho dqekj dfu”B vf/kdkjh ‘kkSaxBkSax&djPNe cSBd esa iapk;r o la?k”kZ lfefr esa fuEufyf[kr izfrfuf/k;ksa us Hkkx fy;k%& 1½ Jh usjsUnz flag lnL; 2½ Jh f’ko jke usxh iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh 3½ Jh egsUnz flag usxh lfpo 4½ Jh egkohj flag iz/kku la?k”kZ desVh 5½ Jh ujsUnz dqekj lnL; la?k”kZ desVh 6½ Jh lqjsUnz flag lnL; 7½ Jh lur dqekj lnL; 8½ Jh jfoUnz dqekj lg lfpo la?k”kZ desVh

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

9½ Jh d`”.k xksiky lnL; la?k”kZ desVh 10½ Jh thr jke 11½ Jh n’kuZ nkl 12½ Jh jes’k pun 13½ Jh izse lkxj 14½ Jh ohj Hknz 15½ Jh Tk; izdk’k 16½ Jh uj/ku lq[k

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼450 es0 ok0½ ds0 lh0 ifjlj fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786&223310- QSDl u0& 223174

Uk0%fg0iz0mtkZ fuxe lhfer@’kkS0d0@jk0, oa iq0&3(iks0) @10 fnukad% lsok esa]

iz/kku] xzke iapk;r iksokjh r0 dYik] ftyk fdUukSjA

fo"k;%& ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe (iksokjh&jYyh) ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk (450 es0 ok0) gsrw futh Hkwfe&vf/kxzg.k ds fy, vukifŸk izek.k&i= tkjh djus ckjsA

egksn;] mijksDr fo”k; ds lanÒZ esa vkidks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe (iksokjh&jYyh)

ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk] xzke iapk;r iksokjh es futh Hkwfe&vf/kxzg.k djus tk jgh gS ftldk C;kSjk fuEufyf[kr gS%& miegky iksokjh [kqyklk [kljk u0 rknkn jdok

818] 814] 815] 813] 819] 1-8933 gS0 812] 394] 389] 390] fdrk@9 miegky rkaxfyax 302] 303] 316] 317] 319] 321] 3-1769 gS0 322] 325] 330] 335] 336] 337] 338] 650] 651] 652] 653] 655] 664] 665] 666] 803] 804] 807] 304] 305] 306] 307] 308] 309] 310] 311] 312] 313] 314] 315] 318] 320] 323] 324] 326] 327] 328] 329] 331] 332] 333] 334] 654] 656] 657] 658] 659] 660] 661] 662] 663] 667] 802] 801] Ok 806 fdrk@61 dqy futh Hkwfe fdrk 70 5-0702 gS0 vr% vki ls fuosnu fd;k tkrk gS fd mijksDr futh Hkwfe&vf/kxzg.k gsrw vukifÙk izek.k i= tkjh djus dh d`ik djs

/kU;okn lfgrA Hkonh;

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

Ofj”B izcU/kd

’kkSSaxBksax djPNe t0 fo0 ifj0 fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks

ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ izfrfyfi%&

1- egkizcU/kd] ’kkSSaxBksax djPNe ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj dks lwpukFkZ gsrq izsf"kr gSA

2- mi&egkizcU/kd] ’kkSSaxBksax djPNe ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj dks lwpukFkZ gsrq izsf"kr gSA

3- iz/kku xzke fodkl lfefr iksokjh&rkxafyx] r0 dYik] ftyk fdUukSj dks lwpukFkZ gsrq izsf"kr gSA

4- iz/kku l?k”kZ lfefr] r0 dYik] ftyk fdUukSj dks lwpukFkZ gsrq izsf"kr gSA

Ofj”B izcU/kd ’kkSSaxBksax djPNe t0 fo0 ifj0 fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks

ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@Mh0th0,e0@jk0,oa iq0@09 fnukad% lsok esa] iz/kku

xzke iapk;r iksokjh rgfly dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½

fo”k;%& ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ 402 eS0 ok0 vukifr izek.k i= tkjh djus ckjs A

egksn;] bl dk;kZy; dks mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa vkids dk;kZy; dks lwfpr djus dk

funsZ’k

feyk gS fd fnukad 17&12&09 dks 12%30 cts vknj.kh; izcU/k funs’d lkfgc mijksDr fo”k; ds

ckjs esa fopkj foe’kZ djuk pkgrs gSa ]vr% vkils vuqjks/k gS fd vki mijksDr fnukad ,oa le;

ds fy, xzkeokfl;ksa dh fefVax iapk;r?kj iokjh esa djokus dks lqfuf’pr djsa A d`I;k bls vfr

vko’;d le>sa A

/kU;okn A Hkonh;

jk0 vkSj iq0 vf/kdkjh ,oa mi&izcU/kd&1 ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ izfrfyfi%&

1- mi&egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukZFk gsrw A

2- iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh ls Hkh vuqjks/k gS fd mijksDr fnukad vkSj le; ij Lo;a ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr ds vU; ink/khdkfj;ksa ds lkFk iksokjh iapk;r?kj esa mifLFkr gksus dh d`ik djsa A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

jk0 vkSj iq0 vf/kdkjh ,oa mi&izcU/kd&1 ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkax fivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

a fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@jk0,oa iq0@09 fnukad% lsok esa iz/kku xzke iapk;r iokjh] rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj fo”k;%& ‘kkSaxVkSax djPNe ¼iokjh&jYyh½ 402 es0 ok0 ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk vukifŸk izek.k i= tkjh djus ckjs fuosnu i= A egksn;] t; fgUn mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe vkils fouez fuosnu djrh gS fd vki vius xzke iapk;r ls vukifŸk izek.k i= fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe dks tYn ls tYn tkjh dj bl jk”Vªfgr ds dk;Z dks lqpk# #i ls vey esa ykus ds fy, viuk lg;ksx nsa A vukifŸk izek.k i= ds lanHkZ esa fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe ds vf/kdkjh le; le; ij vkids xzke iapk;r esa mifLFkr gq, gSa A vkids iapk;r ds ekaxks dks ysdj 29-08-2008 dks vki lHkh xzke iapk;r izfrfuf/k;ksa ,oa la?k”kZ lfefr;ksa ds lnL;ksa ds lkFk fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe ds izcU/k funs’kd Jh r#.k diwj th ,oa ‘kkSaxBkSax djPNe ¼iokjh&jYyh½ ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ds lkFk ou foHkkx ds foJkex`g ‘kkSaxBkSax esa ,d cSBd dh xbZ] ftlesa vki yksxksa }kjk izzLrqr dh xbZ ekxkas dks izcU/k funs’kd }kjk vuqeksfnr dj mldh izfrfyfi vkids iapk;r dks nh xbZ gSA blh fo”k; ij fnukad 05-10-2008] 13-11-2008 ds xzke lHkk esa fdUgh dkj.ko’k vukifŸk izek.k i= ckjs ppkZ ugha gks ikbZ A rnqijkar 07-12-2008- ds xzke lHkk esa xzke lHkk }kjk fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe ds vf/kdkfj;ksa dks vukifŸk izek.k i= tkjh djus ls igys ,d fo’ks”k cSBd dk vk;kstu dj vukifŸk izek.k i= tkjh djus ckjs fu.k;Z fy;k x;k A bl cSBd ds lanHkZ esa iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr ls Hkh fuosnu fd;k tkrk gS fd og Hkh bl cSBd dh frfFk ,oa le; fu/kkZfjr djus esa xzke iapk;r dks viuk lg;ksx nsa A vr% vkils fuosnu gS fd bl cSBd dh frfFk ,oa le; fu/kkZfjr dj ifj;kstuk izeq[k ‘kkSaxVkSax djPNe ¼iokjh&jYyh½ 402 eS0 ok0 fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe dks voxr djus dh dik djsa] rkfd fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe ds vf/kdkjh Hkh bl cSBd esa Hkkx ys dj iapk;rksa dh f’kdk;rksa dk fuokj.k dj ldsa ftllss~

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

xzke iapk;r dks vukifŸk izek.k i= tkjh djus esa ljyrk gks lds D;ksafd Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k o ou foHkkx }kjk ‘kqf) i= ds dk;Z dks iw.kZ djus ds fy, vukifŸk izek.k i= dk gksuk vko’;d gS A /kU;kokn lfgr A Hkonh;

mi&egk izcU/kd ¼v/kh{k.k vfHk;Urk½ ‘kkSaxVkSax djPNe ¼iokjh&jYyh½ ,p0bZ0ih0 ,p0ih0ih0lh0,y0 fjdkaxfivks ftyk fdUukSj fg0 iz0 izfrfyfi%&

1- fuft lfpo] izcU/k funs’kd fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe fgeQSM Hkou iatjh VqVhdaMh

f’keyk&5 dks izcU/k funs’kd ds fy, lwpukFkZ A

2- fuft lfpo] funs’kd ¼flfoy½ fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe fgeQSM Hkou iatjh VqVhdaMh

f’keyk&5 funs’kd ds fy, lwpukFkZ A

3- eq[; i;kZoj.k fo’ks”kK ,oa jkgr ,oa iquZokl vf/kdkjh mŸke Hkou ¼Mksxjk ykWt½

utnhd 103 lqjax f’keyk&4 lwpukFkZ ,oa vko’;d dk;Zokgh gsrw A

4- fuft lfpo] mik;qDr fdUukSj fLFkr fjdkaxfivks dks mik;qDr fdUukSj ds fy, lwpukFkZ

A

5- mi&e.Mykf/kdkjh dYik fLFkr fjdkaxfivks ftyk fdUukSj dks lwpukFkZA

6- iz/kku la?k”kZ lhfefr iokjh ,oa escj dks lwpukFkZ ,oa vko’;d dk;Zokgh gsrw A

mi&egk izcU/kd ¼v/kh{k.k vfHk;Urk½ ‘kkSaxVkSax djPNe ¼iokjh&jYyh½ ,p0bZ0ih0 ,p0ih0ih0lh0,y0 fjdkaxfivks ftyk fdUukSj fg0 iz0

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼450 eSa0 ok0½ ds0 lh0 ifjlj] fjdkax fivks] ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786&223310 QSDl u0& 223174 u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@’kkS0d0,p0bZ0ih0@jk0,oa iquZokl&3@10 fnukad% lsok esa] iz/kku xzke iapk;r iksokjh rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ A

fo”k;%& fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer dks vukifÙk izek.k i= nsus ckjs A

lanHkZ%& xzke lHkk izLrko la[;k 24 fnukad 04-04-2010 tks fd iapk;r lfpo }kjk bl dk;Zy; dks izsf”kr A egksn;] mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa fuosnu fd;k tkrk gS fd tks [kfut lalk/ku ds

,sot esa eq0 3 djksM dh ekax j[kh xbZ gS] ds vkadyu ,oa eqY; fu/kkZj.k gsrw fiNys o”kksZa

esa vftZr jkf’k dk O;kSjk bl dk;kZy; dks ‘kh?kz &vfr’kh?kz iszf”kr djus dh d`ik djsa A

blds vfrfjDr jkf’k ds HkqXrku dh izfdz;k dk O;kSjk Hkh lwfpr djs] rkfd vkxkeh

dk;kZokgh dh tk lds A

/kU;okn A

Hkonh; egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks izfrfyfi%&

1- izcU/k funs’kd] fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer fgeQSM Hkou] VwVhdaMh iatjh f’keyk&5 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

2- eq[; lkekftd ,oa vkj0 ,.M vkj0 fo’ks”kK mÙke Hkou Mksxjk ykWt utnhd 103 lqjax f’keyk& 4 dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr

3- mi&egk izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

4- iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr

5- fodkl desVh iksokjh rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

egk izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

fgekpy izns’k ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer ¼jkT; ljdkj v/khuLFk½

‘kkSaxVksax&djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼450 eSa0 ok0½ ds0 lh0 ifjlj] fjdkax fivks] ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ &172107

Qksu u0% 01786-223310 QSDl u0& 223174 u0- fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@’kkS0d0,p0bZ0ih0@jk0,oa iquZokl&3@10 fnukad% lsok esa] iz/kku] xzke iapk;r iksokjh] rglhy dYik] ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½

fo”k;%& fg0 iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe lhfer dks vukifÙk izek.k i= nsus ckjs A lanHkZ%& bl dk;kZy; i= la[;k fg0iz0Å0fu0lh0@’kkS0d0,p0bZ0ih0@jk0,oa iquZokl&3@10- 518&23 fnukad% 04&05&2010A egksn;]

mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa okafNr tkudkjh vHkh rd bl dk;kZy; dks izkIr

ugha gqbZ gSA vr% iqUk% fuosnu fd;k tkrk gS fd mijksDr fo”k; ds lanHkZ esa tks tkudkjh

ekaxh xbZ Fkh] dks ‘kh?kz&vfr’kh?kz Hkstus dh d`ik djsa rkfd vkxkeh dk;Zokgh vey esa

ykbZ tk lds A

d`I;k bls vfr vko’;d le>s A

/kU;kokn A Hkonh;

Egk&izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½ ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks izfrfyfi%&

1- mi&egk izcU/kd ‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

2- iz/kku la?k”kZ lfefr iksokjh rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

3- fodkl desVh iksokjh rglhy dYik ftyk fdUukSj ¼fg0 iz0½ dks lwpukFkZ gsrw iszf”kr A

egk&izcU/kd ¼ifj;kstuk izeq[k½

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

‘kkSaxBksax djPNe ¼iksokjh&jYyh½ fg0iz0 ÅtkZ fuxe fjdkaxfivks

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

GRAM PANCHAYAT BARANG

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

GRAM PANCHAYAT MEBAR

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL Shongtong-Karchham HEP (450) MW   

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-1 

CHAPTER-19

Grievance Redressal Mechanism

19.1 Grievance Redressal Mechanism

Efficient Grievance redress mechanism will be developed to assist the AP’s resolve their queries and complaints. Grievances of AP’s will first be brought to the attention to the HPPCL PIU level. The grievances not addressed at PIU level will be done through Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC). The order for constitution of GRC by HPPCL at project level has been attached as Annexure-19.1.

Grievances not redressed by the GRC will be brought to the Local Area Development Authority (LADA). The LADA will have representatives from AP’s, HPPCL, field level staff, district magistrate/commissioner, local administration, revenue authority and local community. LADA notification and LADF are given in Annexure 19.2. Other than disputes relating to ownership rights under the court of law, LADA will review grievances involving all resettlement benefits, compensation, relocation, replacement cost and other assistance. The LADA will meet every month (if grievances are brought to the Committee), determine the merit of each grievance, and resolve grievances within a month of receiving the complaint—failing which the AP’s will be free to approach appropriate court of Law for Redressal.

Records will be kept of all grievances received including: contact details of complainant, date the complaint was received, nature of grievance, agreed corrective actions and the date these were effected, and final outcome. The LADA will continue to function during the life of the Project including the defects liability period. The grievance redress mechanism is presented in Figure 1 & 2.

Figure 1: GRC at Project level

Head of the Project   (Chairman)

One Member from MPAF 

One Member from Local Administration 

One Member Pradhan from Project Affected 

One Member from Field level R&R Staff 

Project Management Unit (Shimla) 

Major Grievances 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-2 

Figure 2: Grievance Redress Process in LADA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.2 Grievance Redressal Hierarchy under LADA as on 2011

1. Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) Kinnaur – President.

2. District Commissioner, Kinnaur at Reckong Peo – Vice President.

3. Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Kinnaur at Reckong Peo – Member Secretary.

Members of the committee:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 2. The Additional District Magistrate, Pooh 3. The SDO (Civil) Nichar & Kalpa 4. The DFO Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 5. The CMO Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 6. The District Ayurvedic Officer at Reckong Peo 7. The XEN. HPSEB Division at Reckong Peo 8. The XEN. HP PWD (B&R) Division Karchham at Bhabanagar 9. The XEN. HP PWD (B&R) Div. Kalpa 10. The XEN. IPH Division Reckong Peo 11. The XEN. IPH Division Pooh 12. The District Agriculture Officer Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 13. Dy. Director Horticulture Reckong Peo 14. The Dy. Director Higher Education Kinnaur at Reckong Peo

Gram Panchayat / Sangharsh Samiti

Not Addressed

Affected Persons 

HPPCL 

Grievance Addressed  

LADA  

Grievance Addressed 

Court of Law 

Minor Grievances

Major Grievances

Not Addressed 

Grievance Addressed 

Not Addressed 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-3 

15. The Dy. Director (Electric Education) Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 16. The Dy. Director Animal Health and Breeding Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 17. The Fisheries Officer, Sangla 18. The District Welfare Officer, Reckong Peo 19. The District Language and Culture Officer, Reckong Peo 20. The Project Officer, DRDA, Reckong Peo 21. Astt. Engineer (Division), Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 22. General Manager cum Mining Officer, Kinnaur 23. The Environmental Engineer, HPSPCB, Rampur Busher, District Shimla (H.P.) 24. Labour Officer, Kinnaur at Reckong Peo 25. The BDO Kalpa, Nichar and Pooh 26. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Rupi 27. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Chotta Kamba 28. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Taranda 29. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Barang 30. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Powari 31. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Kalpa 32. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Shudharang 33. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Khawangi 34. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Mebar/Ralli 35. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Pangi 36. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Moorang 37. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Rispa 38. Pradhan Gram Panchayat Thangi 39. The GM Integrated Kashang HEP, HPPCL, Kinfed Building at Reckong Peo 40. The GM, Shongtong – Karchham HEP, HPPCL, Reckong Peo 41. Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd., Tidong HEP, Site Office at Reckong Peo 42. M/S Himachal Shorang Power Ltd. Shorang HEP project office at Dumpti, PO

Chaura, district Kinnaur (H.P.)

19.3 NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE “NOC”:-

Under Forest Conservation Act 2006 for Tribal Area it has been mandatory for the user agency to obtain “NOC” from the affected Panchayats for forest land acquisition. Also, as per Environment Protection Act it is compulsory to conduct Public Hearing meeting in project affected area for obtaining Environment Clearance.

After many consultations with affected Panchayats and addressing their apprehensions and demands, till date the project proponent has obtained “NOC” from Three out of Four affected Panchayats. Only one Panchayat has given conditional “NOC” for the acquisition of private land.

19.4 ACTIVITIES PROPOSED UNDER PROJECT:- 1. The various schemes undertaken through R&R Plan have been incorporated in Chapter 13 of EMP.

2. The various development activities as demanded by the locals during consultations are incorporated in Chapter 18 of EMP.

3. The other development activities as raised by the affected Panchayats in future during the LADC meeting will be taken up accordingly.

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-4 

19.5 PROPOSED ESTIMATE LADA DEVELOPMENT BUDGET -

Total Cost of Project: 2,279.16 (Base cost as per December 2010 price level)

Year Instalment Rs (in millions) 2011 10 (already paid) 2012 71.7 2013 71.1 2014 71.1 2015 71.1 2016 47.4

TOTAL 341.8 ( i.e. 1.5% of Total Project Cost)

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-5 

Annexure- 19.1

Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC)

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-6 

Annexure- 19.2

LADF Notification

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-7 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-8 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-9 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-10 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-11 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-12 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-13 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-14 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-15 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-16 

 

 

 

 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)  

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 19-17 

HPPCL EMP study for Shongtong-Karchham H.E. Project (450 MW)

WAPCOS Centre for Environment 20-1

CHAPTER-20

DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS INVOLVED IN THE CEIA STUDY

The CEIA study has been conducted by WAPCOS Ltd., a government of India Undertaking under Ministry of Water Resources. WAPCOS Ltd., has a full-fledged Centre for Environment who has conducted the above referred study. The list of the Experts involved in the CEIA study is given in Table-20.1.

TABLE - 20.1

List of Experts involved in the CIEA study

S. No. Name Designation Educational Qualification

Experience (Year)

1 Dr. Aman Sharma

Chief Engineer BE (Civil Engg.), ME (Environmental Engg.); Ph.D (Environmental Engineering)

19

2 Dr. A. K. Sharma Additional Chief Scientist

B.Sc., M.Sc.(Fisheries) Ph.D (Fisheries)

19

3 Dr. S.K. Tyagi Additional, Chief Scientist

B.Sc.; M.Sc. (Fisheries) Ph. D (Fisheries)

17

4 Dr. R. K. Singh Senior, Scientist (Grade-I)

B.Sc., M.Sc.(Botany) Ph. D (Agr. Botany)

13

5 Mr. S. Selva Kumar

Senior Scientist (Grade-I)

MA (Geography);MA (Development; Planning & Administration)

13

6 Mr. S. M. Dixit Environmental Engineer

BE (Civil) ;M. Tech. (Environmental Engineering)

5

7 Mrs. Moumita Mondal Ghosh

Environmental Engineer

BE (Civil); M. Tech. (Environmental Engineering)

3