Development and Application of Advanced Weather Prediction Technologies for the Wind Energy Industry...

31
Photo by Bob Henson (UCAR) Challenges & Opportunities for Renewable Energy Prediction U02 Breakthroughs in Understanding and Developing Renewable Energy AGU Conference 2010 William P. Mahoney, Program Director National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 1

Transcript of Development and Application of Advanced Weather Prediction Technologies for the Wind Energy Industry...

Photo by Bob Henson (UCAR)

Challenges & Opportunities for

Renewable Energy Prediction

U02 – Breakthroughs in Understanding and Developing Renewable Energy

AGU Conference 2010

William P. Mahoney, Program DirectorNational Center for Atmospheric Research

Boulder, CO

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research1

Outline

Challenges

Wind Energy Prediction Approaches

NCAR‟s Wind Energy Research & Development

„Breakthroughs‟ or Findings to Date

Future needed breakthroughs

2NCAR

Overarching Challenge

Boundary layer meteorology (0-200 m) is not well understood nor is this layer well measured

Wind energy industry greatly under appreciates the complexity of the airflow in this layer

3

Courtesy: Ned Patton, NCAR

Wind Measure International

Impact to Wind Energy Stakeholders

Uncertainty in available wind resources constrains the marketplace – slows growth

Lack of adequate performance in wind energy forecasts – leads to high integration costs

Wind generators fail early (shortened lifecycle) – leads to costly operations/maintenace

4

Wind Prediction Challenges

Scale Interactions are Critical

Global Scales

Continental Scales

Regional Scales

Local Scales

Long Island

Urban Scales

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research5

GE 1.5 MW Wind Turbine

80 meter hub height77 m blade diameter

60-80 m

10 mobservation

Standard surfaceweather station with a 10 meter highwind sensor.

Assessments & Forecasts

Wind Prediction ChallengesLocal Effects & Phenomenon Must be Addressed

Local Topography

Surface Roughness

Land Use

Vegetation Characteristics

Urbanization

Atmospheric Gravity Waves

Low-level jets

Convection currents

Icing

Turbine wakes

Data ‘void’ boundary layerCopyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

7

Wind Energy Prediction Challenges

End Users Want Energy Predicted Not Wind!

Converting wind to energy depends on:

Knowledge of turbine availability

Extracting hub height winds from NWP

Accurate power curves

Knowledge of wind characteristics

• wind shear (blade tip to tip)

• turbulence

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research8

Approaches to Wind Energy Prediction

Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP)

Statistical Approaches

Use of Data Assimilation

Ensemble Methods

Combined Methods

9Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Typical Wind Energy Prediction Process Diagram

10

Wind Farm Data

Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP)

StatisticalCorrections

Hub Height Conversion

Data Fusion

Wind-to-Power Curve CalculationNumerical Weather

Prediction (NWP)

Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP)

StatisticalCorrections

Wind Energy

Prediction

Simplified diagram!

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Data Assimilation

Weather Observations

Optimizing Prediction Methods by Blending Technologies

11

Forecast Time

3 hrs 6 hrs 12 hrs 24 hrs 7 days 10 days

Persistence0-2 hrs

1 hr

Rapid Cycle Models0-2 hrs

4DDA+NWP3-12 hrs

3DVAR+NWP12 hrs to days

Climatology> 10 days

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Xcel Energy Project A Sampling of Results

Wind Farm in Northeast ColoradoPhoto by Carlye Calvin, UCAR

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Xcel Energy Service Areas

Wind Farms (50+)

2623 Turbines (growing)

3736 MW+ (wind)

~10% Wind

3.4 million customers (electric)

Annual revenue $11B

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

NCAR Wind Energy Prediction SystemXcel Energy Configuration

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research14

WRF RTFDDA System

NCEP DataNAMGFSRUCMOS

Observations

Wind Farm DataNacelle wind speedGenerator power

Node powerMet towerAvailability

Ensemble RTFDDASystem

SupplementalWind Farm Data

Met towersWind profiler

Surface StationsWindcube Lidar

Operator GUI

Meteorologist GUI

WRF Model Output

Wind to Energy Conversion Subsystem

Dynamic, Integrated Forecast System

(DICast®)

CSV Data

VDRAS(nowcasting)

Summary of Preliminary Findings

15

Significant Variability Exists Across Individual Wind Farms

16

Predicting wind variabilityin complex terrain requires careful matching of NWP grid configuration.

Diff =10 ms-1

~250 turbines

18

0

Time

Prediction of Wind Profiles (Shear) Important

17

Increasing NWP

resolution results in

dramatic variations

of vertical profiles of

wind speeds.

Imposes a tough

challenge – which

profiles, if any, are

best?

Need more Obs!

30 kmspacing

123 m spacing

Calculating Turbine Height Winds from NWP Models Requires Special Care

18

Weather models have varying vertical grid structures. Multiple approaches should be used to determine hub height winds.

NCAR uses an ensemble approach tuned for each model, forecast lead time, and location

NWP Output

Hub Hgt

First P-level above

First P-level below

10m wind level

Second P-level above

Blending Output from Multiple Forecast Systems Improves Results

19

Integrating and dynamically weighting multiple forecasts results in a more accurate forecast than any single forecast input.

Wind speed error reductions of 5-30% have been found.

Statistical Post-Processing is Critical

20

• Errors highly depend on

diurnal cycles, station

locations, forecasts

ranges, and weather

regimes.

• Applying statistical bias

correction (KF/AN/ANKF)

improves the forecasts

by 5-30%!

• Impact of analog

approaches last much

longer (> 10 days)

Courtesy: Luca Del MonacheNCAR/RAL

Wind Shear vs. Turbine Efficiency

21

Low-level Jet Wind RampCold Front Wind Ramp

Knowledge of the wind profiler is importantfor wind to power conversion

(Lundquist and Wharton, 2009)

(T. Aguilar, 2010)

Shear Across Blades ImpactsTurbine Efficiency

22

Courtesy, Julie Lundquist

Tip-to-tip shear can reduceBlade efficiency by upTo 20%!

Power curves need tobe adjusted accordingly

Value of Utilizing Wind Turbine Data(in WRF-RTFDDA)

23

W/O Farm DATA

With Farm DATA

Gain:17 % in RMS20% in MAE11% in Bias

0-3 hour Wind Energy Predictions

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Value of Sharing Wind Turbine Data (in WRF-RTFDDA)

24

W/O Farm DATA

With Farm DATA

Gain:6 % in RMS8% in MAE4% in Bias

3-6 hour Wind Energy Predictions

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

NWP Ensemble Provides Important Information for Power Generation Decision Making

25

Geographical View of PredictedWind Variability

24 hour animation

NCAR is working with Xcel Energy to identify the best methods for communicating uncertainty in wind energy prediction

Wind Energy Ramp Event Nowcasting

Causes of Wind Ramp Events

Cold Fronts

Warm Fronts

Thunderstorm Outflows

Sea Breezes

Microbursts

Gravity Waves

Eroding Surface Inversion

Momentum mixing

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research26

Wind Energy Ramp Event8/03/09 771mw up-ramp from 20:10 - 22:10 followed by a 738mw down-ramp from 22:40 - 00:50

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

16:50

17:10

17:30

17:50

18:10

18:30

18:50

19:10

19:30

19:50

20:10

20:30

20:50

21:10

21:30

21:50

22:10

22:30

22:50

23:10

23:30

23:50

0:10

0:30

0:50

1:10

1:30

1:50

Ponnequin

Ridgecrest

Spring Canyon

Cedar Creek

Logan/Peetz Table

Colorado Green/Twin Buttes

Small convective cells

Larger front

2 hours

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

800 MW Ramp

NCAR Auto-Nowcasting System

Wind Energy Nowcasting

Gust frontsapproaching„wind farm‟

Wind rampevent isimminent

Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

„Breakthrough‟ Summary

Ensemble approaches improves wind energy forecasts

Assimilation of nacelle wind data improves NWPperformance

Shear significantly impacts turbine efficiency

Assimilation of radar radial velocity data into rapid cycling NWP improves ramp forecasts

Additional boundary layer observations will improve wind energy forecasts

29

Predicting Wind Power's Growth -- an Art

That Needs More ScienceBy PETER BEHR of

Published: April 28, 2010

“More data, better weather and atmospheric models, and more powerful computer runs are the paths to the next generation of forecasting systems. Public-private partnerships between private forecasting firms and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Center for Atmospheric Research are crucial, industry officials say.”

THANK YOU

31Copyright 2010 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

William P. Mahoney [email protected]

Dr. Sue Ellen [email protected]