Comparative Efficacy Of Endodontic Medicaments Against ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Comparative Efficacy Of Endodontic Medicaments Against ...
i
Comparative Efficacy Of Endodontic
Medicaments Against Enterococcus Faecalis
Biofilms
A thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Clinical Dentistry (Endodontics)
December 2009
Barbara Plutzer BDS (Adel), FRACDS
School of Dentistry
University of Adelaide
ii
Contents
Contents ............................................................................................................................ ii
Abstract ............................................................................................................................ iv
Declaration ....................................................................................................................... vi
Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... vii
1. Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Microbiological goals of Endodontic Treatment ............................................... 1
1.3 Endodontic success and failure .......................................................................... 2
1.4 Enterococci ......................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Enterococci in the normal flora of the oral cavity .............................................. 4
1.5.1 Root canal sampling .................................................................................... 6
1.5.2 Enterococci in primary apical periodontitis ................................................ 7
1.5.3 Enterococci in the root canal after initiation of treatment .......................... 9
1.5.4 Enterococci in post-treatment apical periodontitis ................................... 10
1.5.5 Virulence Factors ...................................................................................... 16
1.6 The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state ................................................... 20
1.7 The ‘biofilm’ concept ....................................................................................... 23
1.7.1 Biofilm formation as a survival strategy ................................................... 24
1.7.2 Evidence for biofilm structures in Endodontics ....................................... 25
1.7.3 Antimicrobial resistance of Biofilms ........................................................ 27
1.8 Antimicrobial agents ........................................................................................ 30
1.8.1 Sodium Hypochlorite ................................................................................ 30
1.8.2 Calcium Hydroxide ................................................................................... 35
1.8.3 Chlorhexidine ............................................................................................ 40
1.8.4 Antibiotics ................................................................................................. 47
1.9 Susceptibility of biofilms to antimicrobials ..................................................... 56
1.10 Rationale for experiment .................................................................................. 62
1.11 Aims ................................................................................................................. 66
iii
2. Materials and Methods ......................................................................................... 67
2.1 Organism .......................................................................................................... 67
2.2 Agar diffusion test ............................................................................................ 67
2.3 Dentine sample preparation .............................................................................. 67
2.4 Biofilm growth ................................................................................................. 68
2.5 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ............................................................. 70
2.6 Test Agents Used ............................................................................................. 71
2.7 Determining Antimicrobial Efficacy ................................................................ 72
2.7.1 Biofilm Harvesting ................................................................................... 72
2.7.2 Cellular viability and protein measurement .............................................. 73
3. Results ..................................................................................................................... 74
3.1 Biofilm Growth ................................................................................................ 74
3.2 Dentine surface prior to inoculation ................................................................. 75
3.3 Effective removal of bacterial biofilm ............................................................. 76
3.4 Sodium Hypochlorite ....................................................................................... 76
3.5 Crushed Samples .............................................................................................. 79
3.6 Ledermix and Odontopaste .............................................................................. 80
3.7 Calcium Hydroxide and 50:50 combinations of Calcium Hydroxide with either Ledermix or Odontopaste ............................................................................................ 83
3.8 Chlorhexidine gel ............................................................................................. 87
4. Discussion ............................................................................................................... 89
4.1 Antibiotic-containing medicaments ................................................................. 89
4.2 Calcium Hydroxide .......................................................................................... 91
4.3 Chlorhexidine gel ............................................................................................. 94
4.4 Sodium Hypochlorite ....................................................................................... 96
4.5 Limitations and future research direction ........................................................ 97
5. Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 99
6. References ............................................................................................................ 100
7. Appendix .............................................................................................................. 113
iv
Abstract
It is well established that bacteria cause pulpal and periradicular disease (Kakehashi et
al. 1965). Of the bacteria recovered from failing root canals, Enterococcus faecalis is
one of the most prevalent species (Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998). Many
laboratory studies have investigated the effectiveness of root canal irrigants and
medicaments against E. faecalis. Most used planktonic cultures, which are not
representative of the in vivo growth conditions of an infected root canal system, where
bacteria grow as a biofilm adhering to the dentinal wall (Nair 1987). Organisation of
bacteria within biofilms confers a range of phenotypic properties that are not evident in
their planktonic counterparts, including a markedly reduced susceptibility to
antimicrobial killing (Wilson 1996).
Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1) To compare the efficacy of commonly used
endodontic medicaments against E. faecalis cultured as a biofilm. The medicaments
tested were Ledermix paste, calcium hydroxide, Odontopaste, 0.2% chlorhexidine gel
and 50:50 combinations of Ledermix/calcium hydroxide and Odontopaste/calcium
hydroxide. 2) To compare the antimicrobial effect achieved through exposure to
endodontic medicaments with that achieved by exposure to a constant concentration of
sodium hypochlorite for varying times.
Methods: A biofilm was established using a continuous flow cell. E. faecalis inoculum
was introduced into the flow cell and allowed to establish on human dentine slices over
v
4 weeks. Each test medicament was introduced into the flow cell for a period of 24 or
48 hours, while sodium hypochlorite was evaluated after 1, 10, 30 and 60 minutes.
Biofilms were harvested by sonication in sterile PBS. Cellular protein levels were
measured to quantitate the amount of biofilm harvested.
Cellular viability was determined using serial plating. The number of colony forming
units was then adjusted for cellular protein levels to allow treatment protocols to be
compared. Qualitative SEM analyses of the biofilm was performed following exposure
to each test agent.
Results: Sodium hypochlorite was the only agent that achieved total bacterial
elimination. Ledermix and Odontopaste had no significant effect on the E. faecalis
biofilm, while calcium hydroxide and 50:50 combinations of calcium hydroxide with
either Ledermix or Odontopaste were able to reduce viability by > 99%.
Conclusion: When used in isolation, antibiotic containing medicaments had no
appreciable effect on the viability of Enterococcus faecalis. Sodium hypochlorite
remains the gold standard for bacterial elimination in root canal therapy.
vi
Declaration
This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other
degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution, and, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another
person, except where due reference has been made in the text.
I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library,
being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the
Copyright Act 1968.
I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the
web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the
Australaisan Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through the web search engines,
unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of
time.
Signed by: ___________________
Barbara Plutzer
vii
Acknowledgements
I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my research supervisor, Associate
Professor Peter Cathro, for his vision, wisdom and support. I am forever grateful he
made the long journey from New Zealand. His approachability, optimism and fortitude
have been invaluable.
Many thanks to my research supervisor, Dr Peter Zilm, for his dedication and guidance.
His immense research experience and skill have been priceless. I appreciate the many
hours he has spent on my behalf and his thorough editing of my attempts at scientific
writing.
I am grateful to Professor Geoffrey Heithersay, who has been a source of inspiration
and encouragement throughout my post-graduate course. His wisdom, generosity and
friendship will not be forgotten.
I would like to recognise for their invaluable guidance Dr Tracy Fitzsimmons and Dr
Neville Gully. Thank you for your practical support and insight.
Thank you to the staff at the Adelaide microscopy centre for their expertise and
assistance.
viii
The support and friendship of my fellow D. Clin Dent candidates, Dr Aaron Seet and
Dr Mark Stenhouse made my time at the hospital a pleasure. I look forward to fulfilling
our promise of a Scandinavian sojourn.
Thank you to my mum, Kamila, for her unconditional love and moral support.
To my partner Andre, thank you for your support, love, and patience. Thank you for
putting my degree into perspective when it seemed all-consuming.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge that this research was financially supported by the
Australian Dental Research Foundation and the Australian Society of Endodontology.
1
1. Literature Review
1.1 Introduction
In 1894 W.D. Miller described with fascination the micro-organisms seen in and
recovered from the infected root canal. He was perhaps the first to associate disease and
inflammation in the jaws with the infected pulp canal space (Miller 1894). Since that
time, the microbiological basis of both endodontic disease and of endodontic treatment
failure has become firmly established (Kakehashi et al. 1965; Sjögren 1997). Bacterial
penetration of the pulp is often asymptomatic but may lead to pain and discomfort, and
it is the sequel of infection that inspires greater concern and provides the strongest
impetus for intervention. Whereas the common, chronic forms of apical periodontitis
seldom pose medical problems of any magnitude, it is the smaller number of cases that
spread to cause inter-fascial infections and possibly serious complications at distant
sites that form a back-drop on which the concepts and rationales for treatment are based
(Ørstavik 2003).
1.2 Microbiological goals of Endodontic Treatment
Apical periodontitis is described as an infectious disease caused by microorganisms
colonizing the root canal system (Kakehashi et al. 1965; Sundqvist 1976; Möller et al.
1981). The endodontic treatment of teeth with irreversibly inflamed pulps is essentially
a prophylactic treatment from a microbiological perspective, because the radicular vital
pulp is usually free of infection; and the rationale is to prevent further infection of the
2
root canal system and the emergence of apical periodontitis (Haapasalo 2005). In cases
of infected necrotic pulps or in root canal-treated teeth associated with apical
periodontitis of infective origin, an intraradicular infection is already established, and
the goal of endodontic procedures becomes the elimination of the infecting
microorganisms. Ideally, endodontic treatment procedures should sterilize the root
canal, but given the complex anatomy of the root canal system, it is widely recognized
that, with available instruments and techniques, fulfilling this goal is utopic for most
cases. The reachable goal is to reduce bacterial populations to a level below that
necessary to induce or sustain disease (Siqueira and Rôças 2008).
1.3 Endodontic success and failure
When endodontic treatment is performed under aseptic conditions and according to
accepted clinical principles, the success rate is generally high. Most follow up studies
on endodontic therapy report overall success rates of 85%-90% (Strindberg 1956;
Seltzer et al. 1963; Kerekes and Tronstad 1979; Molven and Halse 1988; Sjögren et al.
1990). Epidemiological studies, however, report success rates of only 60-75%,
identifying a surprisingly high prevalence of apical periodontitis associated with root
filled teeth (Eriksen 2002).
Although many failure cases are caused by technical problems during treatment, some
cases fail even when apparently well treated (Sundqvist et al. 1998). Studies
investigating the aetiology of endodontic treatment failures in cases where the initial
therapy was performed to a satisfactory standard have identified five factors that may
3
contribute to a persistent periapical radiolucency following treatment. The factors are:
intraradicular infection (Nair et al. 1990), extraradicular infection especially by bacteria
of the species Actinomyces israelii and Priopionibacterium propionicum (Nair and
Schroeder 1984; Sjögren et al. 1988) foreign body reactions (Yusuf 1982; Nair et al.
1990); cysts, especially when containing cholesterol crystals (Nair et al. 1993) and
fibrous scar tissue healing following conventional treatment (Nair et al. 1999). In most
cases, failure of endodontic treatment is believed to be due to microorganisms persisting
in the apical parts of the root canal system, even in seemingly well-treated teeth (Nair et
al. 1990).
1.4 Enterococci
Enterococci are gram-positive cocci that occur singly, in pairs, or as short chains. They
are facultative anaerobes, possessing the ability to grow in the presence or absence of
oxygen (Gilmore 2002). Enterococcus species live in vast quantities in the human
intestinal lumen and under most circumstances cause no harm to their host. They are
also present in human female genital tracts and the oral cavity in lesser numbers (Koch
et al. 2004). One of the characteristic features of enterococci is their ability to survive
very harsh environments including extreme pH levels (4.0-11.0) (Nakajo et al. 2006)
and salt concentrations. They resist bile salts, detergents, heavy metals, ethanol, azide
and desiccation (Gilmore 2002). They can grow in the range of 10oC to 45oC and
survive a temperature of 60oC for 30 minutes (Hartke et al. 1998).
4
Over the last few decades, enterococci have emerged as important nosocomial
pathogens. This importance is attributed primarily to the high degree of antibiotic
resistance that is exhibited by most enterococci. Of particular concern has been the
rapid spread of enterococci with resistance to vancomycin (VRE), creating therapeutic
problems for patients with serious infections such as endocarditis (Gilmore 2002).
Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for 80% of all infections caused by enterococci,
with E. faecium responsible for the remaining 20% (Ruoff et al. 1990).
1.5 Enterococci in the normal flora of the oral cavity
Enterococci form part of the normal gastrointestinal tract flora in animals and humans,
though only a few studies have focused on their prevalence in the oral cavity. In an
early report, Williams et al. collected saliva samples from 206 individuals and analysed
them for enterococci. Saliva was collected more than once from most donors. Overall,
enterococci were detected in the saliva of 21.8% of subjects on at least one occasion.
However, the carriage was not consistent, meaning that on one experimental day an
individual tested positive, while testing negative on a subsequent day (Williams et al.
1950). More recently, Sedgley et al. investigated the prevalence, phenotype and
genotype of oral enterococci. The study used microbiological culturing methods to
detect enterococcal isolates in the oral rinse samples of 11% of 100 patients receiving
endodontic treatment and 1% of 100 dental students with no history of endodontic
treatment. All enterococcal isolates were identified as E. faecalis (Sedgley et al. 2004).
In a follow-up study using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as
well as microbiological culturing, 30 oral rinse samples from endodontic patients were
analysed for E. faecalis. Quantitative PCR detected E. faecalis in 17% of the samples,
5
while parallel culture assays were less sensitive, detecting the microorganism in only
7% of samples. Proportionally, oral E. faecalis comprised less than 0.005% of the total
bacterial load (Sedgley et al. 2005).
A significantly higher prevalence of oral enterococci was detected in a recent study
which used a multi-site oral sampling strategy in combination with sensitive detection
methods incorporating both culture and PCR. E. faecalis was detected in at least one
tongue, oral rinse, or gingival sulcus sample in 68% of patients and in the root canals of
5% of patients. The tongue was found to be the most prevalent detection site (Sedgley
et al. 2006). In other studies oral E. faecalis was detected at a higher prevalence in
periodontitis patients compared to controls (Sedgley et al. 2006; Souto and Colombo
2008). Evidence shows that E. faecalis is clearly a part of the human oral microbiota. In
healthy individuals not being treated with wide-spectrum antibiotics, the relative
amount of enterococci is very small, often below the detection levels of normal
sampling and culturing methods (Portenier 2003). Recent publications, however,
confirm former speculations that the occurrence of E. faecalis in the oral cavity is
higher than previously suggested.
A thought provoking recent review contends that enterococci are not part of the typical
commensal microbiota of the oral cavity, but rather a transient infective microorganism
sourced from food. Enterococci are ubiquitous in food products, such as cheese,
fermented sausages, minced beef, pork, and fish (Zehnder and Guggenheim 2009).
Razavi et al. investigated the clearance of E. faecalis from a highly contaminated
cheese among healthy volunteers. One minute after ingestion, a median of 5480 colony
6
forming units were recovered. Bacterial counts were significantly reduced after 100
minutes, and below the limit of detection after 1 week (Razavi et al. 2007). These
findings may suggest that enterococci adhere to oral tissues of healthy subjects but fail
to become permanently established within the oral microbiota and are thus gradually
eliminated. This interpretation correlates well with Williams’ early findings of sporadic
sampling of E. faecalis in the saliva of the same individuals.
1.5.1 Root canal sampling
Absorbent paper points are typically used to sample the contents of the root canal for
bacterial culturing. (Möller 1966). Paper point sampling is clinically convenient.
However, establishing whether the microorganisms sampled are representative of those
involved in the infectious process is generally difficult. The technique also has other
limitations. A sample may show the presence of microorganisms although the root
canal is sterile – a false positive sample – or no microorganisms may be revealed
although the root canal system is infected – a false negative sample. False positive
samples are primarily caused by contamination from the oral cavity, a problem of
particular significance when PCR technology is used. The risk of obtaining a false
negative sample is equally as great. The root canal system is often a complex
arrangement of main, lateral and accessory canals, as well as ramifications, isthmuses
and cul de sacs (Vertucci 1984). These anatomical niches provide a protective
environment for bacterial survival, and they are precisely the regions that are difficult to
reach when taking a microbiological sample. False negative samples can also be due to
limitations in the cultivation methods available, combined with the fastidious nature of
the organisms. In fact, of the 620 predominant oral bacterial species, about 35% have
not yet been cultured in vitro (Paster & Dewhirst 2009).
7
Despite these inherent limitations, serial sampling of root canals at various stages of
root canal therapy showcases the changing microbiological environment, and provides a
means of evaluating the effectiveness of various stages of therapy. Various studies have
contributed to our understanding of the endodontic infection in untreated infected root
canals (Sundqvist 1976; Fabricius et al. 1982; Munson et al. 2002), in root canals where
therapy has been initiated (Siren et al. 1997), and in teeth with post treatment disease
(Möller 1966; Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Hancock et al. 2001).
1.5.2 Enterococci in primary apical periodontitis
Although more than 700 species of bacteria have been isolated from the oral cavity,
only a limited number have been consistently isolated from endodontic infections
(Sundqvist 1994). The selective pressures operating in the root canal environment,
including a low redox potential and nutrients rich in peptides and low in carbohydrates,
favour the strong dominance of strictly anaerobic bacteria typical of primary apical
periodontitis. Together with some facultative anaerobic bacteria such as streptococci,
lactobacilli and Actinomyces, they can establish a wide variety of bacterial
combinations. Usually three to six species can be isolated from a single tooth using
conventional culturing techniques (Sundqvist 1976; Fabricius et al. 1982). Modern
molecular methods are able to detect a significantly higher number and greater diversity
of species, including numerous as-yet uncultivable organisms (Munson et al. 2002).
Munson et al. recovered a mean number of 20 bacterial taxa from each infected root
canal sample using combined culture and molecular methods (Munson et al. 2002).
8
Enterococcal species have traditionally been regarded as atypical isolates in primary
endodontic infections. Culturing methods of detection have isolated enterococci in 5-
12% of sampled root canals (Engström 1964; Möller 1966; Sundqvist et al. 1989).
More recently, Siqueira et al. used molecular techniques to examine the prevalence of
Actinomyces spp., streptococci and E. faecalis in primary root canal infections.
Samples were obtained from 53 infected teeth, of which 27 had acute periradicular
abscesses. The checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization assay detected streptococci in
22.6% of the samples, actinomyces spp. in 9.4%, and E. faecalis in 7.5%. The
occurrence of E. faecalis was significantly lower in acute infections (3.7%) than in
asymptomatic teeth (11.5%) (Siqueira et al. 2002). Rôças et al. similarly concluded that
E. faecalis was more frequently detected in asymptomatic cases. Using the nested PCR
method, E. faecalis was detected in 33% of root canals associated with asymptomatic
chronic periradicular lesions, in 10% of root canals associated with acute apical
periodontitis, and in 5% of the pus samples aspirated from acute periradicular abscesses
(Rôças et al. 2004).
The proportions of E. faecalis as part of the total microbial load were studied by
examining samples from both primary infection and retreatment cases. The samples
were divided into two equal aliquots that were independently analysed by investigators
using culturing and real-time PCR methods. E. faecalis was detected in a surprisingly
high 67.5% of 40 primary infection samples and 89.6% of the 48 retreatment samples.
The high prevalence was attributed by the authors to the sensitivity of the molecular
method used and the patient selection which was based on referrals of teeth with
suspected persistent infection. The median proportion of E. faecalis in the samples was
2.8% of the total bacteria in the primary infection samples and 0.98% in the retreatment
9
cases (Sedgley et al. 2006). It is obvious that while the prevalence of E. faecalis is high,
particularly in retreatment cases, proportionally this microorganism makes up only a
very small part of the total bacterial flora. This may imply that other organisms present
did not reach detection levels, or had more fastidious growth requirements that could
not be mimicked in the laboratory environment.
1.5.3 Enterococci in the root canal after initiation of treatment
Reports of culture reversals in longitudinal studies, characterized by the sudden positive
sampling of enterococci after initiation of treatment, have led to speculations of coronal
leakage through the temporary restoration (Sjögren et al. 1991; Sundqvist et al. 1998).
Siren et al., studied the correlation between several clinical parameters and the
occurrence of enterococci in teeth where treatment did not result in healing. The clinical
treatment history of 40 Enterococcus-positive and 40 Enterococcus-negative teeth was
compared. A higher proportion of E. faecalis was found in teeth whose canals lacked an
adequate seal for a period during the treatment or teeth that were treated over 10 or
more visits (Siren et al. 1997). Compromised asepsis during endodontic treatment thus
appears to be an important causative factor for contamination of the root canal by E.
faecalis.
The possibility of E. faecalis from food products causing a transient oral infection of
sufficient magnitude to infect the root canal was recently tested by Kampfer et al. An
artificial oral environment was established using a masticator device perfused with
artificial saliva in which test teeth, temporarily restored with Cavit, were exposed to
10
controlled loads of mastication over a period of 1 week. A cheese containing viable E.
faecalis cells was placed between the occlusal surfaces of the test teeth. Of the 16
specimens restored with 2mm of Cavit, 6 showed leakage, while 1 of the 16 specimens
with a 4mm cavit restoration had cultivable E. faecalis cells detected. These results go
some way to giving credence to the suspicion that food derived microbiota could enter
the root canal system via microleakage (Kampfer et al. 2007).
1.5.4 Enterococci in post-treatment apical periodontitis
The microbial flora of root-filled canals with persisting periapical lesions differs
markedly from that of untreated necrotic dental pulps, with a very limited assortment of
microorganisms able to survive. Generally, only one or a small number of species are
recovered, with a predominance of gram-positive microorganisms and facultative
anaerobes (Möller 1966; Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Hancock et al.
2001). E. faecalis is the most commonly recovered species in these teeth (Siqueira and
Rôças 2004; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Molander et al. 1998; Pinheiro et al. 2003; Gomes
et al. 2008), with the likelihood of detection in failing root canals 9 times higher than in
primary endodontic infections (Rôças et al. 2004).
As far back as 1964, Engström examined 223 teeth for the presence of enterococci. In
teeth undergoing primary endodontic treatment, enterococci were isolated in 12% of
culture positive cases, while for previously root-filled teeth, the recovery rate was 21%
(Engström 1964).
11
Sundqvist retreated 54 teeth with post-treatment disease. Microbial growth was
recovered in 24 of the canals (45%) and E. faecalis was the most frequent isolate,
detected in 38% of culture-positive canals. On each occasion, E. faecalis was isolated in
pure culture. The success rate for the teeth from which E. faecalis was isolated after
removal of the earlier root filling was somewhat lower (66%) than the overall average
(74%) (Sundqvist et al. 1998).
Molander examined the microbiological status of 100 root-filled teeth with apical
periodontitis. The presence of intracanal microbiota was demonstrated in 68% of teeth,
most of which contained one or two strains of microorganisms. E. faecalis was the most
frequently isolated species, recovered in 32 teeth, or 47% of the culture-positive root
canals. A further 20 teeth without signs of periapical pathosis were similarly cultured
for microbial presence. Mostly sparse growth of intracanal bacteria was detected in 9
teeth (45%), while 11 were deemed bacteria-free (Molander et al. 1998).
Pinheiro et al. studied the microbial flora of 60 root-filled teeth with persisting
periapical lesions. Microorganisms were recovered from 51 teeth (85%); mostly one or
two strains were present per canal. Of the species isolated, 57% were facultative and
43% obligate anaerobes. E. faecalis was the most frequently recovered species, detected
in 53% of culture-positive canals, 18 times in pure culture. Significant clinical
associations were observed between polymicrobial or anaerobic infections and pain:
Prevotella intermedia/Prevotella nigrescens and tenderness to percussion;
Streptococcus spp./Actinomyces spp. and sinus formation; and Streptococcus spp./
Candida spp. with coronally unsealed teeth (Pinheiro et al. 2003).
12
Siqueira & Rôças identified microorganisms associated with post-treatment disease
using PCR. DNA was extracted from 22 teeth selected for endodontic re-treatment, and
analysed for the presence of 19 target species. All samples were positive for at least one
of the microorganisms, with E. faecalis being the most prevalent species and detected in
77% of teeth. The mean number of species in canals filled 0-2mm short of the
radiographic apex was 3 (range 1-5), whereas canals filled shorter than 2mm from the
apex yielded a mean of 5 species (range 2-11) (Siqueira and Rôças 2004). These
findings support the notion that the microflora of poorly obturated root canals resembles
more closely that of a primary endodontic infection.
Gomes et al. recently investigated the presence of selected bacterial species in 45 teeth
with post-treatment disease using PCR analysis. The bacterial isolates detected in each
canal were correlated with the clinical features of each case. The 9 target species were
detected in 39 of 45 cases (87%). E. faecalis was the most frequently recovered species,
detected in 78% of the study teeth, followed by Peptostreptococcus micros (51%),
Porphyromonas gingivalis (36%), Filifactor alocis (27%), Treponema denticola (24%)
Porphyromonas endodontalis (22%), Prevotella intermedia (11%) and Prevotella
nigrescens (11%). T. denticola and P. micros were statistically associated with
tenderness to percussion. P. nigrescens was associated with the presence of
spontaneous pain and abscess; P. endodontalis and P. nigrescens were associated with
purulent exudates (Gomes et al. 2008).
In summary, enterococci have been identified in a considerable proportion of teeth with
persisting periapical lesions that had endodontic therapy completed to a technically
13
satisfactory level (Sundqvist et al. 1998), as well as in counterparts that had insufficient
root fillings (Peciuliene et al. 2000). They are detected frequently in studies from
different regions irrespective of treatment protocol; in root filled teeth both in regions
where calcium hydroxide is commonly used as an interim dressing (Molander et al.
1998) and in countries where this topical antiseptic is usually not applied (Hancock et
al. 2001).
It is apparent that prevalence data for E. faecalis are quite variable, and very much
influenced by the method of detection used in each investigation. Cultivation is time-
consuming, requires controlled conditions during sampling and transport to ensure
microorganism viability, and can lead to variable results based on the experience of the
microbiologist (Siqueira and Rôças 2005). In contrast, PCR-based detection methods
enable rapid identification of specific DNA sequences with a high degree of sensitivity.
This higher sensitivity, however, can be at least partly attributed to the detection of free
floating DNA, and DNA from nonviable, culturable viable cells and viable but non-
culturable cells (Sedgley et al. 2006). Consequently, the number of intact and viable
microorganisms cannot be readily established. In addition, molecular techniques
analyse total DNA extracted from the sample and in the process destroy the
microorganism. Thereafter, being no longer culturable, it is not possible to study
phenotypic characteristics and potential pathogenicity associated with individual strains
recovered from the root canal (Sedgley et al. 2005).
A further factor affecting the validity of many investigations is the problem of
contamination from saliva or plaque from the outer tooth surface. Engström highlighted
14
that many teeth harboring enterococci in the root canal system also show positive
enterococcal growth on the outer tooth surfaces (Engström 1964). False positive results
are more likely to occur when PCR technology is used (Nair 2007). Hence, a
meticulous sampling technique which includes disinfection of the tooth and the access
cavity with associated sterility checks of both sites is a prerequisite to yielding
meaningful results (Zehnder and Guggenheim 2009). Unfortunately, relatively few
studies comply with the current decontamination protocols which recommend that root
canal sampling for polymerase chain reaction be preceded by sodium hypochlorite
(NaOCl) rather than iodine surface disinfection (Ng et al. 2003).
The presence of microleakage, through defective coronal restorations, old temporary
restorative materials, or nonrestored teeth is also likely to influence microbial findings.
In the study by Pinheiro et al. the authors acknowledge that microleakage was detected
in the majority of teeth (45/60) being re-treated (Pinheiro et al. 2003), as was the case
with the investigation by Gomes, where 35 of the 45 teeth had defective coronal seals
(Gomes et al. 2008). Consequently, proper decontamination of the access for PCR
would have been exceptionally difficult if not impossible to achieve, and enterococcal
DNA could have originated from sources outside the root canal.
While there has been considerable focus in the literature on the prevalence of E.
faecalis at various stages of endodontic infection, the clinical features of an
enterococcal infection have not been elucidated. Neither Pinheiro nor Gomes, who
attempted to correlate the presence of the bacterial species in root canals with the
clinical features of each case, could associate E. faecalis with any acute symptoms in
15
teeth with post-treatment disease (Pinheiro et al. 2003; Gomes et al. 2008). This is
consistent with Siqueira’s findings that E. faecalis was detected more often in
symptom-free teeth with primary apical periodontitis than in teeth with acute symptoms
(Siqueira et al. 2002). Kaufman et al. investigated the association between E. faecalis
and endodontically treated teeth with and without periradicular lesions. The latter group
of teeth were retreated because of technically inadequate root canal therapy or
suspected coronal leakage. The study found teeth with a periradicular lesion were
significantly more likely to harbor bacteria, but enterococci were detected more
frequently in teeth with a normal periapex (Kaufman et al. 2005).
It has been suggested that enterococci may be selected in root canals undergoing
standard endodontic treatment because of low sensitivity to antimicrobial agents
(Dahlén et al. 2000). Furthermore, Love postulated that the proficiency with which this
bacterium invades dentinal tubules provides it protection from chemo-mechanical root
canal preparation and intracanal dressings (Love 2001). Subsequently, when the
opportunity arises, E. faecalis could be released from the tubules into the root canal
space and act as a source of re-infection (Sedgley et al. 2005). Even bacteria entombed
at the time of root filling could provide a long-term nidus for subsequent reinfection. In
a study evaluating the survival of entombed E. faecalis, root canals were inoculated
with one of two strains of this microorganism following chemomechanical preparation.
After 48 hours of incubation, the canals were obturated with gutta percha, a zinc-oxide
eugenol sealer and restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC). Culture, PCR and
histological methods were used to recover E. faecalis after 6 and 12 months. All root
filled teeth demonstrated viable E. faecalis cells (Sedgley et al. 2005).
16
An alternative possibility is that enterococci are opportunistic coronal invaders of the
improperly sealed necrotic or filled root canal system, gaining entry during or after
treatment (Zehnder and Guggenheim 2009). Whether E. faecalis is a major pathogen
involved with the aetiology of endodontic failures or merely a colonizer that takes
advantage of the environmental conditions within obturated root canals has yet to be
fully appreciated (Rôças et al. 2004).
1.5.5 Virulence Factors
An appreciation of the potential virulence factors of E. faecalis is useful in our attempts
to decipher the role of this microbe in endodontic infections. enterococci possess a
number of virulence factors that permit adherence to host cells and extracellular matrix,
facilitate tissue invasion, effect immune-modulation and cause toxin-mediated damage
(Portenier 2003). These factors are discussed below.
1.5.5.1 Aggregation Substance
This is a surface localized protein, which mediates the cell-to-cell contact that enables
the exchange of plasmids between recipient and donor strains. Plasmids are
autonomous, covalently closed circular, double-stranded, supercoiled DNA elements,
which frequently confer traits that facilitate growth and survival under atypical
conditions, such as resistance to antibiotics (Sedgley et al. 2005). Aggregation
substance may serve as a virulence determinant by assisting the dissemination of
plasmid-encoded virulence factors and facilitating attachment to leukocytes, connective
extracellular matrix and possibly dentine (Hubble et al. 2003). E. faecalis strains
17
expressing aggregation substance were able to bind to type I collagen twice as
effectively as aggregation substance-negative strains (Rozdzinski et al. 2001). This may
be of particular importance with respect to endodontic infections, since collagen is the
main organic component of dentine (Kayaoglu and Ørstavik 2004). Hence, an
expression of aggregation substance could enable the E. faecalis cells to attach and
colonise the dentine surface and possibly be a factor in their invasion of dentinal
tubules.
Aggregation substance may also act as a protective element, favouring bacterial
survival by assisting in efforts to resist host defence mechanisms in endodontic
infections. For example, aggregation substance has been reported to facilitate the
intracellular survival of phagocytosed E. faecalis cells within human macrophages
(Kayaoglu and Ørstavik 2004). Similarly, E. faecalis cells expressing aggregation
substance have been found to be more resistant to killing by human neutrophils (Rakita
et al. 1999). Aggregation substance has also been identified as being capable of
inducing inflammation through the stimulation of T-lymphocytes, followed by a
massive release of inflammatory cytokines, and leading to host tissue damage
(Kayaoglu and Ørstavik 2004). Sedgley et al. identified aggregation substance in all
endodontic enterococcal strains tested (Sedgley et al. 2005).
1.5.5.2 Enteroccus surface protein (Esp)
This is a large chromosome-encoded surface protein, whose role in virulence is yet to
be fully elucidated. It is speculated, however, that Esp has a role in allowing enteroccal
cells to evade the host immune system. Toledo-Arana et al. demonstrated a relationship
18
between the presence of Esp and the biofilm formation capacity of E. faecalis, with
none of the esp-defective E. faecalis strains able to establish biofilm (Toledo-Arana et
al. 2001).
1.5.5.3 Gelatinase
Gelatinase is an extracellular zinc-containing metalloproteinase capable of hydrolyzing
gelatin, collagen and its degradation products, effectively providing the organism with
nutrients. However, it is also possible for proteases to cause direct or indirect damage to
the host tissues, and thus be classified as virulence factors (Portenier 2003). E. faecalis
isolated from hospitalized patients and patients with endocarditis have been found to
produce increased levels of gelatinase compared with community isolates (Coque et al.
1995). In relation to endodontic infection, gelatinase activity was expressed in 70% of
the 33 endodontic enterococcal isolates tested (Sedgley et al. 2005). Expression of the
gelatinase gene was associated with increased adhesion of E. faecalis to dentine in vitro
(Hubble et al. 2003) and enhanced biofilm formation in microtiter plates (Kristich et al.
2004). Gelatinase activity may also play a role in the long-term survival of E. faecalis
in obturated root canals, as evidenced by higher viable counts of gelatinase-producing
compared to gelatinase-negative variants of the microbe in an ex vivo model (Sedgley
2007).
1.5.5.4 Cytolysin
This is a plasmid-encoded toxin produced by beta-hemolytic E. faecalis isolates. It lyses
erythrocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages, kills bacterial cells and
may lead to reduced phagocytosis (Portenier 2003). Epidemiological investigations
19
partly support a role for cytolysin in disease occurrence. Ike et al. reported that
approximately 60% of E. faecalis clinical isolates derived from various sources were
haemolytic, compared to only 17% of E. faecalis isolates derived from the faecal
specimens of healthy individuals (Ike et al. 1987).
1.5.5.5 Extracellular superoxide
Superoxide anion is a highly reactive oxygen radical involved in cell and tissue damage.
Extracellular superoxide production has been reported to be a common trait in strains of
E. faecalis, with 87 out of a total of 91 clinical and community isolates found to
produce detectable extracellular superoxide anion levels (Huycke et al. 1996). Isolates
associated with bacteremia or endocarditis produced significantly higher extracellular
superoxide levels than those from the stool of healthy subjects (Huycke et al. 1996),
indicating its potential role as a virulence factor. In relation to an endodontic infection,
production of superoxide by persisting E. faecalis cells within the root canal system
could translate into continuing tissue damage at the periapex and an absence of healing.
An imbalance between oxygen radical production in periapical lesions and its
elimination has been suggested to contribute to periapical damage and bone loss in
chronic apical periodontitis (Marton et al. 1993).
1.5.5.6 Pheromones
Pheromones are chromosomally encoded, small hydrophobic peptides which have a
signalling function between E. faecalis cells. The transfer frequency of certain plasmids
in E. faecalis is increased several-fold by the action of pheromones (Kayaoglu and
Ørstavik 2004). Briefly, the latter phenomenon occurs as follows. The recipient strain
20
secretes pheromones corresponding to the plasmid which it does not carry. In response,
the donor strain produces aggregation substance that provides tight contact between the
recipient and donor strain, facilitating the conjugative transfer of the replicated plasmid.
Once a copy of the plasmid is acquired, the recipient shuts off the production of that
pheromone, but continues to secrete pheromones specific for other plasmids that it does
not carry. Antibiotic resistance and other virulence traits, such as cytolysin production,
can be disseminated among strains of E. faecalis via the pheromone system (Kayaoglu
and Ørstavik 2004). Response to pheromones was identified in 48% of endodontic
enterococcal isolates, suggesting the potential of these cells to transfer plasmid DNA
between strains.
1.5.5.7 Virulence factors and Pathogenicity
In conclusion, for a bacterium to be pathogenic, it must be able to adhere to, grow on,
and invade the host. It must then survive host defence mechanisms, compete with other
bacteria, and produce pathological changes. With the virulence factors described above,
E. faecalis appears to possess the requisites to establish an endodontic infection and
maintain an inflammatory response potentially detrimental to the host (Kayaoglu and
Ørstavik 2004). Which, if any of these factors play a role in the pathogenesis of
periradicular diseases remains to be elucidated (Rôças et al. 2004).
1.6 The viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state
It has been observed that after an extended period of starvation, the number of
culturable cells as determined by plate counts declines, while the total number of cells
21
present, as determined by a direct count method, remains unchanged (Bogosian et al.
1998). While one explanation is that the non-culturable cells are dead, an alternative
explanation is that the non-culturable cells have entered a state in which they are still
viable but cannot be cultured by standard microbiological techniques (Lleo et al. 1998;
Lleo et al. 2001). The viable but non-culturable state is believed to constitute a survival
strategy adopted by bacteria when exposed to environmental stress (Barer and Harwood
1999). The hostile environmental conditions that have been described as inducing the
activation of the VBNC state include low nutrient concentrations, low or high
temperatures, high salinity and extreme pH. When in the VBNC state, bacteria are no
longer culturable on conventional growth media, but the cells display active
metabolism, respiration, membrane integrity, and gene transcription (Lleo et al. 2001).
To date, there are no adequate techniques to prove the viability of cells in the VBNC
physiological state (Portenier 2003). Recovery of culturable cells from a population of
non-culturable cells would provide convincing support for the VBNC hypothesis. The
appearance of large numbers of culturable cells after the addition of nutrients to
populations of non-culturable cells has been reported to occur via a process termed
resuscitation. However, such recovery studies can be confounded by the presence of
small numbers of culturable cells, which can grow in response to the addition of
nutrients and give the illusion of resuscitation. Bogosian et al. prepared samples that
contained only non-culturable cells of various enteric bacteria, and subjected them to
either a temperature shift or a nutrient addition in order to determine their resuscitation
potential. They did not yield any culturable cells (Bogosian et al. 1998).
22
It has also been suggested that the presence of culturable cells is required for the
resuscitation of non-culturable cells. This possibility was tested by using a mixed
culture recovery method, which evaluated a mixture of easily distinguishable culturable
and non-culturable cells to determine which group of cells responded to various
resuscitation techniques. The results showed that the only culturable cells yielded from
the mixtures were from the initial culturable cells, indicating that the culturable cells
were not capable of resuscitating the non-culturable cells (Bogosian et al. 1998). The
authors concluded that the non-culturable cells were dead, questioning the existence of
the VBNC state for enterococcal bacteria.
In an attempt to develop methods capable of detecting non-culturable bacteria and
establishing their viability, numerous researchers have used a modification of the
conventional PCR method by using RNA as the amplification template (Lleo et al.
2000; Williams et al. 2006). This method is referred to as reverse transcription-PCR or
RT-PCR. Messenger RNA is a short-lived molecule which serves as a marker of
viability and active replication. Lleo et al. reported that E. faecalis conserves its
viability in the VBNC state by limiting protein synthesis to a few key proteins, such as
the penicillin binding protein (pbp5). Thus RT-PCR amplification of the pbp5-
encoding regions of E. faecalis mRNA should allow the detection of VBNC E. faecalis
and therefore, enable us to determine whether endodontic infections harbor the
bacterium in this state (Lleo et al. 2000). Williams et al. detected E. faecalis in 7 out of
87 intra-canal samples that were negative by cultivation, suggesting that even when
undetected by cultivation, E. faecalis remains viable and may return to an active,
pathogenic state. However, every sample that was positive by the RNA-based RT-PCR
assay was also positive by the DNA-based qualitative PCR assay, indicating that viable
23
bacteria may simply have been present in numbers small enough to be detected by the
more sensitive molecular methods but not by cultivation (Williams et al. 2006). Some
caution must therefore be exercised when evaluating recent studies that purport to show
E. faecalis in the VBNC state and studies claiming to show cellular resuscitation
(Portenier 2003).
1.7 The ‘biofilm’ concept
Although the concept of a microbial biofilm is not a new one, it has not been until
recent years that its importance in human disease has been recognized. A biofilm can be
defined as a microbial community characterized by cells that are attached to a
substratum, encased in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substance, and exhibiting
altered growth phenotypes (Donlan and Costerton 2002). A complex system of cell-to-
cell communication underlies this process. Bacteria themselves account for a variable
fraction of the total biofilm volume, typically 5-35%. The remainder of the volume is
comprised of extracellular matrix (del Pozo and Patel 2007)
The diversity of biofilm-associated infections is rising, with estimates indicating their
involvement in more than 65% of all bacterial infections (Lewis 2001). A number of
human bacterial diseases produce lesions characterized by the presence of biofilm.
Examples include infections of the oral soft tissues and teeth, as well as the middle ear,
gastrointestinal and urogenital tract. Biofilms have been observed on invasive medical
devices, such as indwelling catheters, cardiac implants, and tracheal and ventilator
tubing (Costerton et al. 1999).
24
Biofilms grow comparatively slowly, and infections are often slow to produce overt
symptoms. Sessile bacterial cells release antigens and stimulate the production of
antibodies, but these are ineffective in killing biofilm bacteria, and can in fact cause
immune complex damage to surrounding tissues (Costerton et al. 1999). Even in
individuals with excellent cellular and humoral immune reactions, biofilm infections
are rarely resolved by the host defence mechanisms. Antibiotic therapy typically
suppresses symptoms of infection by killing free-floating bacteria shed from the
attached population, but fails to eradicate those cells that are still embedded in the
biofilm. When antimicrobial chemotherapy stops, the biofilm can act as a nidus for the
recurrence of infection (Stewart and Costerton 2001).
1.7.1 Biofilm formation as a survival strategy
A major advantage to its colonizing species is the protection afforded by the biofilm
structure from competing microorganisms, from environmental factors such as host
defence mechanisms, and from potentially toxic substances in the environment such as
lethal chemicals and antibiotics (Socransky and Haffajee 2002). Biofilms also facilitate
the processing and uptake of large, complex nutrient molecules that could not be
efficiently degraded by an individual bacterium. The breakdown of these nutrients
requires the sequential action of a range of complementary extracellular enzymatic
profiles (Svensater 2004). Other benefits of a community microbial lifestyle are cross-
feeding (one species providing nutrients for another), the removal of potentially harmful
metabolic products, and the development of an appropriate physicochemical
environment to facilitate microbial survival (Socransky and Haffajee 2002).
25
In many aspects the biofilm mode of growth is a survival strategy, and may therefore be
favoured by bacteria colonizing the harsh environmental conditions of the root canal.
This aspect is supported by the finding that clinically isolated E. faecalis species
possess many of the characteristics of a biofilm style of growth, including increased
adherence capacity, increased virulence factors and increased resistance to
antimicrobials (George et al. 2005).
1.7.2 Evidence for biofilm structures in Endodontics
Currently, limited information is available on the development or the physiology of
biofilms in the root canal (Figdor and Sundqvist 2007). An accurate depiction of the
ultrastructural features of the biofilm of infected root canals was first reported by Nair,
who observed ‘dense aggregates sticking to the canal walls’ and forming layers of
bacterial condensations. Amorphous material filled the interbacterial spaces and was
interpreted as an extracellular matrix of bacterial origin (Nair 1987).
Noiri et al. examined the surfaces of extracted teeth, root tips and extruded gutta-percha
points acquired from teeth with refractory periapical periodontitis and noted bacterial
biofilms in 9 of the 11 samples. The gutta-percha surface was almost completely
covered with a glycocalyx-like structure, with filaments, long rods, and spirochete-
shaped bacteria predominating. Planktonic cells were observed at a distance from the
glycocalyx structure in some areas. The findings suggested that bacterial biofilms
formed in extra-radicular areas were related to refractory periapical periodontitis (Noiri
et al. 2002). A follow up in vitro investigation concluded that E. faecalis, Strep.
26
sanguis, Strep intermedius, Strep. pyogenes and Staph. aureus produced single-species
biofilms on the surfaces of gutta-percha points. High serum concentrations were
required for the biofilm to establish (Takemura et al. 2004).
Distel et al. noted the ability of pure cultures of E. faecalis to form biofilm structures on
the canal walls of both calcium hydroxide medicated and non-medicated root canals.
Colonies of E. faecalis consisted of bacteria embedded in branching networks of
filamentous material representing the extracellular polysaccharide matrix. The authors
suggested that biofilm formation may be a mechanism that allows this organism to
resist treatment (Distel et al. 2002).
Nair et al. assessed the intracanal microbial status of the apical root canal system of the
mesial roots of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis.
Periradicular surgery was performed on 16 teeth immediately after the completion of
one-visit endodontic treatment. Fourteen of the sixteen mandibular molars examined
showed residual infection of the mesial roots after instrumentation, irrigation with
NaOCl, and obturation were completed. The infectious agents were mostly located in
the uninstrumented recesses of the main canals, the isthmus communicating between
them, and in accessory canals. They were mostly organized as biofilms (Nair et al.
2005).
27
1.7.3 Antimicrobial resistance of Biofilms
Susceptibility tests of in vitro biofilm models have shown the survival of bacterial
biofilms after treatment with antibiotics at concentrations hundreds or even a thousand
times the minimum inhibitory concentration of the bacteria measured in a suspension
culture (Stewart and Costerton 2001). Abdullah et al. demonstrated that E. faecalis
grown as a biofilm was more resistant to chlorhexidine and povidone iodine than the
same strain grown in planktonic suspension (Abdullah et al. 2005).
It is likely that biofilms evade antimicrobial challenges by multiple mechanisms. One
mechanism of biofilm resistance is the failure of an agent to penetrate the full depth of
the biofilm. The biofilm matrix is known to retard the diffusion of some antibiotics and
solutes in general (Costerton et al. 1999). The negatively charged polymers within the
matrix may neutralize strong oxidizing agents, such as sodium hypochlorite, making it
difficult for them to penetrate and kill microorganisms (Stewart et al. 2001).
The second mechanism involves the physiological state of biofilm microorganisms.
Bacterial cells residing within a biofilm grow more slowly than planktonic cells, and
consequently take up antimicrobial agents at a reduced rate. Furthermore, the depletion
of nutrients can force bacteria into a dormant growth phase in which they are protected
from killing (Portenier et al. 2005).
The third suggested mechanism responsible for antimicrobial tolerance is that
microorganisms within the biofilm experience metabolic heterogeneity. The physical
28
conditions available to support bacterial growth, such as pH, ion concentration, nutrient
availability, and oxygen supply, vary throughout the biofilm (Distel et al. 2002). Most
antibiotics are not active in a variety of physical environments. Aminoglycosides for
instance are more effective against bacteria growing in aerobic conditions than the same
microorganism growing anaerobically (Costerton et al. 1999); therefore not all cells
within the biofilm will be affected in the same way.
It is evident that oral microorganisms have the capacity to respond and adapt to
changing environmental conditions (Bowden and Hamilton 1998). Individual
microorganisms are able to sense and process the chemical information from the
environment and adjust their phenotypic properties accordingly. Quorum sensing refers
to the bacterial cell-to-cell communication mechanism for controlling cellular functions
within biofilm structures. The signalling is mediated by diffusible molecules which,
when present in sufficient concentrations, serve to modify gene expression in
neighbouring microorganisms. Quorum sensing is known to be involved in the
regulation of several microbial properties, including virulence and the ability to form
biofilms, incorporate extracellular DNA and cope with environmental stress
(Cvitkovitch et al. 2003).
The proximity of individual bacteria in biofilms increases the opportunity for gene
transfer, making it possible to convert a previously avirulent organism into a highly
virulent pathogen, or a bacterium that is susceptible to antimicrobials into a resistant
one (Potera 1999). This potential for gene transfer within biofilms is particularly
significant in the case of E. faecalis, because a number of its virulence factors are
29
encoded on transmissible plasmids. These include collagenase, gelatinase and adhesins,
all having the potential to contribute to the survival of this species in the root canal
(Distel et al. 2002).
A recent study demonstrated that over 80% of the bacteria isolated from acute
endodontic abscesses or cellulitis had the ability to coaggregate with genetically distinct
bacteria from the same site (Khemaleelakul et al. 2006). The significance of this is that
coaggregated bacteria in biofilms might be able to transfer genetic material. Evidence
for interspecies gene transfer was produced recently when it was shown that horizontal
exchange of antibiotic resistance can occur between different bacterial species within
root canals. Transfer of a conjugative plasmid carrying erythromycin resistance
between 2 endodontic infection-associated species, S. gordonii and E. facealis in an ex
vivo tooth model was observed (Sedgley et al. 2008).
Finally, it has been speculated that a sub-population of microorganisms exists within a
biofilm which are known as ‘persisters’. These constitute a small percentage of the
original population and are thought to represent a highly resistant phenotypic state that
is resistant to killing by antimicrobial agents (Stewart and Costerton 2001). This
hypothesis is supported by studies indicating that immature or newly formed biofilms
are significantly less susceptible to antibiotics than corresponding planktonic cells, even
though the formed layer is too thin to pose a barrier to penetration to either medication
or metabolic substrates (Lima et al. 2001; Spratt et al. 2001).
30
1.8 Antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial agents have generally been developed and optimized for their activity
against fast growing, dispersed populations containing a single micro-organism.
Unfortunately the effectiveness of such agents does not translate to the in vivo
conditions present on the tooth surface, where bacteria grow as biofilms (Svensäter
2004). The biofilm structure may go some way to explain the frequent discrepancy
observed in studies testing the antimicrobial effectiveness of endodontic irrigants and
medicaments clinically, and in vitro.
1.8.1 Sodium Hypochlorite
Sodium hypochlorite is the most widely used irrigating solution. It has broad spectrum
antimicrobial activity, rapidly killing vegetative and spore-forming bacteria, fungi,
protozoa, and viruses (Siqueira et al. 2007). It exerts its antibacterial effect through its
ability to oxidise and hydrolyse cell proteins and to some extent, osmotically draw
fluids out of cells due to its hypertonicity (Pashley et al. 1985). When hypochlorite
contacts tissue proteins, nitrogen, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde are formed within a
short time and peptide links are broken, resulting in protein dissolution. Sodium
hypochlorite is thus a potent antimicrobial agent and additionally possesses the unique
ability to dissolve necrotic tissue and organic components of the smear layer (Haapasalo
2005).
In vitro studies unequivocally support the strong antibacterial activity of sodium
hypochlorite. Siqueira et al. reported that 4% NaOCl was significantly more effective
31
than saline solution in disinfecting root canals inoculated with E. faecalis (Siqueira et
al. 1997). In an agar diffusion study, NaOCl at concentrations of 2.5% and 4% was
effective against four black-pigmented obligately anaerobic bacteria and four
facultative bacteria (Siqueira et al. 1998). Vianna et al. tested three gram-negative
anaerobes typically isolated from primary apical periodontitis: Porphyromonas
gingivalis, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Prevotella intermedia. All three species
were effectively killed within 15 seconds when exposed in a broth suspension to NaOCl
at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 5% (Vianna et al. 2004). Berber et al. assessed the
efficacy of 0.5%, 2.5% and 5.25% NaOCl irrigation in human extracted teeth infected
for 21 days with E. faecalis. The study protocol involved comparing various preparation
techniques and either hand or rotary instrumentation. Following preparation, root canals
were sampled and dentine chips obtained to assess dentine tubule disinfection. For all
preparation techniques and at all depths of dentine tested, 5.25% NaOCl was shown to
be the most effective irrigant solution tested, followed by 2.5% (Berber et al. 2006).
The antifungal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite was investigated by Waltimo et al. Both
5% and 0.5% NaOCl achieved effective killing of Candida albicans after a 30 second
exposure. Sodium hypochlorite concentrations of 0.05% and 0.005% were too weak to
kill the yeast, even after 24 hours of incubation (Waltimo et al. 1999). The antifungal
properties of NaOCl were less impressive when Sen et al. used root sections of teeth
inoculated with C. albicans and exposed them to 1% NaOCl, 5% NaOCl and 0.12%
chlorhexidine for variable times. The smear layer had an inhibitive effect on the
antifungal properties of the test agents. In its presence, antifungal activity was observed
only in the 1 hour treatment groups for all solutions. When the smear layer was absent,
5% NaOCl was the first to display antifungal activity after 30 minutes (Sen et al. 1999).
32
Radcliffe et al. observed that E. faecalis was more resistant to the antimicrobial activity
of hypochlorite compared to the yeast C. albicans (Radcliffe et al. 2004).
Byström and Sundqvist evaluated the effect of 0.5% NaOCl on fifteen single-rooted
teeth in vivo. Each tooth was treated at five appointments, and the presence of bacteria
in the root canal was studied on each occasion. No antibacterial intracanal dressings
were used between appointments. When 0.5% NaOCl was used, no bacteria could be
recovered from twelve of fifteen root canals at the fifth appointment, compared with
eight of fifteen control root canals which had no recoverable bacteria after the use of
saline irrigation. The results were statistically significant in favour of NaOCl, but the
study highlighted that not all root canals could be rendered bacteria free through
mechanical debridement and NaOCl irrigation, even after several appointments
(Byström and Sundqvist 1983; Byström and Sundqvist 1985).
More recent clinical investigations have confirmed the ability of NaOCl to greatly
reduce microbial counts within a treated root canal, and even render a proportion of root
canals free of cultivable microorganisms. Yet, independent of the mechanical technique
used for preparation, the size of the apical preparation or the concentration of NaOCl
irrigation used, about half the root canals will continue to harbor cultivable bacteria
(Shuping et al. 2000; McGurkin-Smith et al. 2005; Siqueira et al. 2007).
Peculiene et al. studied the effect of instrumentation and NaOCl irrigation in previously
root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Retreatment was carried out under aseptic
33
conditions using rubber dam. The root fillings were removed with hand instruments,
and without the use of chloroform. After the first microbiological sample was taken, the
canals were cleaned and shaped with reamers and Hedstroem files to a size 40 or larger,
using 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. A second microbiological sample was then taken.
Bacteria were initially isolated in 33 out of 40 teeth, with E. faecalis present in 21 teeth,
C. albicans in 6 teeth, gram-negative enteric rods in 3 teeth and other microbes in 17
teeth. Following instrumentation and irrigation no enteric gram-negative rods or yeasts
were found in the second sample. In contrast, E. faecalis persisted in 6 root canals, and
other microbes were found in 5 canals (Peciuliene et al. 2001). This finding
corroborates the results of the in vitro studies, indicating the increased resistance of E.
faecalis to NaOCl when compared with C. albicans and other gram-negative rods.
The root canal milieu is a complex mixture of a variety of organic and inorganic
compounds. The relative importance of these compounds in the inactivation of root
canal disinfectants has been evaluated in an in vitro model. Dentine powder was shown
to exert an inhibitory effect on the antibacterial effectiveness of 1% sodium
hypochlorite. When hypochlorite was pre-incubated with dentine for 24 hours, the
killing of E. faecalis required 24 hours (Haapasalo et al. 2000).
Evaluations of antibacterial efficacy as a function of sodium hypochlorite concentration
reveal conflicting results. In vitro studies, particularly agar diffusion tests, generally
report reduced antibacterial effectiveness of NaOCl following dilution (Yesilsoy et al.
1995; Siqueira et al. 1998) Gomes et al. tested in vitro the effect of various
concentrations against E. faecalis using cell culture plates. The microbe was killed in
34
less than 30 seconds by the 5.25% solution, while it took 10 and 30 minutes for
complete killing of the bacteria by 2.5% and 0.5% solutions, respectively (Gomes et al.
2001).
In a more clinically applicable ex vivo model, Siqueira et al. evaluated the impact of
hypochlorite concentration using extracted human teeth that were inoculated with E.
faecalis prior to instrumentation and irrigation with either 1%, 2.5%, or 5.25% NaOCl.
No significant difference was noted between the three NaOCl solutions tested (Siqueira
et al. 2000). Numerous clinical studies have similarly found no significant differences
in antibacterial efficiency between 0.5% and 5% NaOCl solutions (Cvek et al. 1976;
Byström and Sundqvist 1985). This suggests clinical factors such as the regular
exchange and large volumes of irrigant may maintain the antibacterial effectiveness of
the NaOCl solution, compensating for a reduced concentration.
One of the fundamental properties of sodium hypochlorite is its ability to dissolve
organic matter inside the root canal system. This dissolution is dependent of three
factors: frequency of agitation, amount of organic matter in relation to the amount of
irrigant and the surface area of the tissue to undergo dissolution (Mohammadi 2008).
Okino et al. evaluated the tissue dissolving capacity of sodium hypochlorite and
chlorhexidine by placing weighed bovine pulp fragments in contact with 20mls of
NaOCl or chlorhexidine within a centrifuge, until total dissolution took place. Sodium
hypochlorite was the only agent tested that effectively dissolved the organic tissue. The
dissolution speed was affected by concentration, with 2.5% NaOCl dissolving pulpal
tissue faster than 1% and 0.5% NaOCl (Okino et al. 2004). These findings were
35
confirmed by Naenni et al., who used standardized samples of necrotic tissue obtained
from pig palates for this dissolution study (Naenni et al. 2004).
The main disadvantage of using sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant is that it
is highly toxic at high concentrations, and tends to induce tissue irritation on contact
(Hauman and Love 2003). Zhang et al. evaluated the cytotoxicity of four concentrations
of NaOCl (5.25%, 2.63%, 1.31%, and 0.66%) on fibroblasts grown on cell culture
plates. The results showed that toxicity of NaOCl was dose-dependent (Zhang et al.
2003). Barnhart et al. measured the cytotoxicity of several endodontic agents on
cultured gingival fibroblasts, and showed that iodine potassium-iodide and calcium
hydroxide were significantly less cytotoxic than NaOCl (Barnhart et al. 2005).
1.8.2 Calcium Hydroxide
The efficacy of calcium hydroxide in endodontic therapy stems mainly from its
bactericidal effects, its ability to stimulate the formation of calcified tissue and its
capacity to denature protein, aiding the dissolution of pulpal remnants. Cvek
popularised the use of calcium hydroxide in the endodontic treatment of incompletely
developed tooth roots, exploiting its ability to produce sterile necrosis and subsequent
calcification (Cvek, 1976). Currently, calcium hydroxide is recognised as one of the
most effective antimicrobial dressings available for the purposes of endodontic
treatment (Siqueira and Lopes 1999). Its antimicrobial activity is due to the release and
diffusion of hydroxyl ions, which produce a highly alkaline environment incompatible
with microbial survival. Hydroxyl ions are indiscriminately reactive with a range of
36
biomolecules, exerting their lethal effects on bacterial cells by damaging their
cytoplasmic membranes and denaturing proteins and DNA (Siqueira and Lopes 1999).
Byström et al. examined the anti-bacterial effects of different medicaments and found a
4-week application of calcium hydroxide to be more effective than camphorated
paramonochlorophenol or camphorated phenol. Calcium hydroxide was capable of
rendering 97% of the canals culture-negative; while this was achieved in only 66% of
the canals treated with paramonochlorophenol or camphorated phenol (Byström et al.
1985). Sjögren et al. found that dressing canals with calcium hydroxide for 7 days was
sufficient to reduce canal bacteria to a level that produced a negative culture (Sjögren et
al. 1991). The effectiveness of calcium hydroxide as an anti-bacterial agent was further
confirmed in the study by Shuping et al., in which the addition of calcium hydroxide
medicament after chemomechanical preparation with rotary Ni-Ti instrumentation and
NaOCl irrigation increased the number of culture-negative canals from 61.9% to 92.5%
(Shuping et al. 2000). These reports contrast with findings of little difference in
treatment outcome between single and multiple-visit treatment using a calcium
hydroxide dressing (Trope et al. 1999; Weiger et al. 2000; Peters and Wesselink 2002).
For calcium hydroxide to act effectively as an intracanal dressing, the hydroxyl ions
must be able to diffuse through dentine and pulpal tissue remnants. Studies have
demonstrated that hydroxyl ions derived from a calcium hydroxide medication do
diffuse through root dentine, but the pH values decrease as a function of distance from
the main canal. Tronstad et al. showed that the pH in the root canal was greater than
12.2, whereas in the most peripheral dentine, the pH ranged from 7.4 to 9.6 (Tronstad et
37
al. 1981). Similar results were reported by Nerwich et al., who also showed that there
was a difference in the rate and amount of diffusion, with cervical dentine increasing in
pH much more rapidly than apical dentine. This was attributed to an increased
concentration and diameter of dentinal tubules in the cervical compared to the apical
third of the root. It was also found that a time period of 1-7 days was required for the
hydroxyl ions to reach the outer root dentine in this in vitro model, and 3-4 weeks was
needed to reach peak pH levels peripherally (Nerwich et al. 1993). This has
implications for establishing appropriate time-frames for dressing changes.
In order to have antibacterial effects within dentinal tubules, the ionic diffusion of
calcium hydroxide needs to exceed the dentine’s buffering capacity, reaching pH levels
sufficient to destroy bacteria (Siqueira and Lopes 1999). Haapasalo clearly showed that
dentine powder abolished the killing of E. faecalis by calcium hydroxide. Without the
dentine, the test organism was eliminated within minutes, whereas with the dentine
powder added, no reduction in the bacterial colony-forming units could be measured,
even after 24 hours of incubation (Haapasalo et al. 2000). The strong impact of dentine
on the antibacterial action of a saturated calcium hydroxide solution has been attributed
to the buffering action of dentine against alkali, with proton donors such as H2PO4-,
H2CO3 and HCO3- found in the mineralized hydroxyapatite of dentine (Haapasalo et al.
2007). With a modification of the dentine powder model, Portenier et al. showed that
organic material may also be capable of buffering calcium hydroxide because killing of
E. faecalis by calcium hydroxide was completely prevented by 18% bovine serum
albumin. This protein is used to simulate the high protein content of an inflammatory
exudate which may be present within the root canal (Portenier et al. 2001). These
findings must be treated with a degree of caution, however, as they are in vitro studies
38
not necessarily representative of the clinical situation. In particular, the agents tested in
these experiments are exposed to a much larger surface area of the dentine powder than
would be the case clinically, a fact that is likely to have increased the overall buffering
effect.
In vitro studies have demonstrated the capacity of calcium hydroxide to dissolve
necrotic tissue, using porcine and bovine muscle tissue (Hasselgren et al. 1988; Turkun
and Cengiz 1997). In addition, these studies found sodium hypochlorite and calcium
hydroxide had an additive effect, with calcium hydroxide pre-treatment of root canals
increasing the effectiveness of 0.5% NaOCl in achieving clean root canal walls as
assessed by SEM (Turkun and Cengiz 1997). Calcium hydroxide also makes a
significant contribution to the inactivation of lipopolysaccharides. Bacterial
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has a major role in the development of periapical bone
resorption (Spångberg 2002). Treatment with an alkali such as calcium hydroxide
affects the hydrolization of the lipid moiety of bacterial LPS, resulting in the release of
free hydroxyl fatty acids. Thus calcium hydroxide mediated degradation of LPS may be
an additional important reason for the beneficial effects obtained with calcium
hydroxide use in clinical endodontics (Spångberg 2002).
E. faecalis is well recognized for its capacity to resist the antibacterial effect of calcium
hydroxide (Byström et al. 1985; Haapasalo and Ørstavik 1987; Ørstavik and Haapasalo
1990; Safavi et al. 1990; Siqueira and de Uzeda 1996). In fact its ability to withstand
high pH levels is an identifying characteristic of this microorganism. Byström et al.
showed that the pH needs to reach levels of 11.5 or higher to exert a bactericidal effect
39
on E. faecalis (Byström et al. 1985). Investigations of the mechanisms involved in the
resistance of E. faecalis to calcium hydroxide identified that its survival at high pH was
related to the effective function of its proton pump. When cells were exposed to
calcium hydroxide at pH 11.1 for 30 minutes, there was a 20-fold reduction in cell
survival in the presence of the proton pump inhibitor CCCP (Evans et al. 2002).
Furthermore, the buffering effects of dentine may not allow a sufficiently high pH to be
achieved in the dentinal tubules (Haapasalo et al. 2000). The biofilm forming ability of
E. faecalis constitutes another important survival strategy (Distel et al. 2002), while its
proficiency at invading dentinal tubules affords the organism physical protection from
chemo-mechanical root canal preparation and intracanal dressings (Love 2001).
Haapasalo and Ørstavik reported that a calcium hydroxide paste failed to eliminate,
even superficially, E. faecalis within the dentinal tubules (Haapasalo and Ørstavik
1987), a finding later supported by Heling et al. (Heling et al. 1992). Currently,
investigations are focusing on identifying specific ‘stress’ genes that become
upregulated following prolonged exposure to alkaline pH levels (Appelbe and Sedgley
2007).
Calcium hydroxide has great value in endodontics, but it is not a panacea. A limited
antibacterial spectrum means that calcium hydroxide does not affect all members of the
endodontic microbiota. The frequent isolation of enterococci in cases of endodontic
failure has led some to question its routine use as an intracanal medicament, especially
in re-treatment cases (Molander et al. 1998). In a study of retreatments, 11% of the root
canals still contained bacteria after two consecutive dressings with calcium hydroxide.
Two-thirds of these re-treatments failed (Sundqvist et al. 1998).
40
1.8.3 Chlorhexidine
This synthetic cationic bisbiguanide is highly efficacious against several gram-positive
and gram-negative oral bacterial species, as well as yeasts. The positive charge of the
chlorhexidine molecule interacts with the negatively charged phosphate group on
microbial cell walls, thereby altering the cells’ osmotic equilibrium (Gomes et al.
2003). This increases the permeability of the cell wall, allowing the chlorhexidine
molecule to penetrate into the bacteria. At low concentrations (0.2%) chlorhexidine
exerts a bacteriostatic effect, by causing low molecular weight elements such as
potassium and phosphorous to leak out of the cell. At higher concentrations (2%)
chlorhexidine is bactericidal as precipitation of the cytoplasmic contents results in cell
death (Gomes et al. 2003). Despite claims of biocompatibility, chlorhexidine is
cytotoxic when in direct contact with human cells. A comparative study using
fluorescence assays on human PDL cells showed similar cytotoxicity between 0.4%
NaOCl and 0.1% chlorhexidine (Chang et al. 2001). Boyce et al. found chlorhexidine
0.05% to be uniformly toxic to both cultured human cells and microorganisms (Boyce
et al. 1995).
Most comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and sodium
hypochlorite find their antibacterial effects in vitro and ex vivo to be similar at
comparable concentrations. Oncag et al. evaluated the antibacterial properties of 5.25%
sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine and 2% chlorhexidine with 2.2% cetrimide. The
root canals of extracted teeth were infected with E. faecalis and the antibacterial effects
of the irrigants were examined after 5 minutes and 48 hours. Two percent chlorhexidine
with cetrimide was significantly more effective against E. faecalis than 5.25% NaOCl at
41
5 minutes, although no significant differences could be observed when the same
specimens were sampled at 48 hours (Oncag et al. 2003).
Two in vitro studies investigated the effectiveness of several concentrations of NaOCl
(0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, 4% and 5.25%) and three concentrations of chlorhexidine (0.2%, 1%,
and 2%) in both liquid and gel forms, against various endodontic pathogens. All
irrigants were effective in killing E. faecalis, but required vastly different times of
exposure. Chlorhexidine in liquid form at all concentrations tested, and NaOCl at
5.25% were the most effective irrigants, eliminating the test organism within 30
seconds. The 0.2% chlorhexidine gel, on the other hand, required 2 hours contact time
to produce a negative culture of E. faecalis (Gomes et al. 2001; Vianna et al. 2004).
Siqueira et al. tested the antibacterial effect of several endodontic irrigants against four
black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and four facultative anaerobes by means of
an agar diffusion test. The 4% and 2.5% concentrations of NaOCl were found to have a
more pronounced antibacterial effect than 2% and 0.2% chlorhexidine. No significant
difference was observed between the zones of inhibition recorded for the two
concentrations of chlorhexidine (Siqueira et al. 1998).
Numerous studies use the agar diffusion method to compare the antibacterial efficacy of
chlorhexidine, calcium hydroxide and their combination, usually against E. faecalis.
The results consistently show chlorhexidine to be more effective than calcium
hydroxide paste in eliminating the test organism, and generally chlorhexidine alone is
42
more successful than its combination with calcium hydroxide (Gomes et al. 2006;
Ballal et al. 2007; Neelakantan et al. 2007; de Souza-Filho et al. 2008). The results of
the agar diffusion method depend upon the molecular size, solubility and diffusion of
the materials through the aqueous agar medium, the bacterial species and the number of
bacteria inoculated, pH of the substrates in plates, agar viscosity, storage conditions of
the agar plates, incubation time and the metabolic activity of the microorganisms
(Gomes et al. 2006). Therefore, the inhibition zones may be more related to the
materials’ solubility and diffusibility in agar than to their actual efficacy against the
microorganisms. The antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide is related to its high
pH, which causes the medicament to precipitate on agar, preventing its diffusion. This
may explain the poor performance of calcium hydroxide when the agar diffusion
method is used (Gomes et al. 2006).
A more clinically applicable model than the agar diffusion test uses extracted teeth
which are instrumented, inoculated with a test organism, usually E. faecalis, and
exposed to the antimicrobial agent. Investigations comparing the efficacy of
chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide at eliminating E. faecalis from infected dentinal
tubules found chlorhexidine to be significantly more effective than calcium hydroxide
paste or a mixture of the two (Schafer and Bossmann 2005; Ercan et al. 2006).
Chlorhexidine achieves its optimal antimicrobial activity within a pH range of 5.5-7.0.
It is likely that increasing the pH above 7.0 by adding calcium hydroxide will lead to
the precipitation of chlorhexidine molecules and a reduction in its effectiveness
(Mohammadi and Abbott 2009). Therefore the usefulness of mixing calcium hydroxide
and chlorhexidine remains unclear and controversial (Athanassiadis et al. 2007).
43
As alluded to already, many in vitro studies use extracted bovine or human teeth mono-
infected with E. faecalis. Chlorhexidine is known to be less effective against gram-
negative bacteria than gram-positive taxa. Its efficacy against gram-positive taxa such
as E. faecalis in laboratory experiments may therefore cause an over-estimation of its
clinical usefulness (Zehnder 2006). This could at least partly explain why the potential
benefits of chlorhexidine indicated by in vitro studies have not been fully realised in
vivo. In a randomised clinical trial on the reduction of intracanal microbiota by either
2.5% NaOCl or 0.2% chlorhexidine irrigation, hypochlorite was found to be
significantly more efficient than chlorhexidine in obtaining negative cultures (Ringel et
al. 1982).
In another randomised clinical trial by Zamany et al., a 2% chlorhexidine solution, used
as a final irrigant, significantly decreased bacterial loads in root canals that had been
irrigated with sodium hypochlorite during canal preparation. Cultivable bacteria were
retrieved at the conclusion of the first visit in 1 out of 12 chlorhexidine-treated teeth, in
contrast to the control group in which 7 out of 12 teeth showed growth (Zamany et al.
2003). A shortcoming of this otherwise well conducted study was that the final
chlorhexidine rinse was compared to an identical procedure using sterile saline, thus not
clarifying whether this regimen is superior to the use of hypochlorite as a final rinse.
When chlorhexidine is used as an irrigating solution, it has a relatively short effective
exposure time in the root canal, which does not allow its full antibacterial action to be
expressed. Chlorhexidine has the unique feature of imparting antibacterial substantivity
to dentine. The positively charged molecules of chlorhexidine can adsorb onto dentine,
44
and prevent microbial colonisation for some time after medication. In order to achieve
this substantivity, prolonged interaction is required to allow saturation of the dentine
with chlorhexidine molecules. It has been suggested that this necessitates the placement
of chlorhexidine as an intracanal medicament between appointments for at least seven
days, rather than using it only as an irrigant (Athanassiadis et al. 2007).
Lin et al. placed a slow release device containing 5% chlorhexidine in cylindrical
bovine root specimens infected with E. faecalis for seven days. Subsequently, no
bacteria were recovered up to 500µm into the dentinal tubules. This compared to a
significant reduction but a failure to eliminate viable bacteria when using 10ml of 0.2%
chlorhexidine as an irrigant (Lin et al. 2003).
The antibacterial efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gel, calcium hydroxide and a
combination of both was assessed in teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. This
randomised clinical trial by Manzur concluded that, when used as intracanal dressings,
the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide was comparable
(Manzur et al. 2007). In the limited sample of thirty-three teeth, a one-week calcium
hydroxide dressing reduced the bacteria-positive canals from 3 to 2, while medicating
with 2% chlorhexidine gel showed a reversal of culture for one tooth, increasing the
number of bacteria-positive canals from 4 to 5. Wang et al. evaluated the additional
antibacterial effect of a 2 week intracanal dressing with a mixture of 2% chlorhexidine
gel and calcium hydroxide. No significant difference could be detected in the
percentage of positive samples before and after the placement of the medicament,
45
suggesting that the intracanal dressing did not significantly improve bacterial reduction
(Wang et al. 2007).
Paquette et al. evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate
liquid applied in vivo as an intracanal medicament for 7-15 days. No increase in the
proportion of teeth with negative cultures or reduction in bacterial counts beyond that
achieved after chemo-mechanical preparation could be found (Paquette et al. 2007). In
fact, a significant increase in bacteria positive samples was reported, from 32% before
to 54% after medication with chlorhexidine liquid. The use of a liquid form of
chlorhexidine was suggested as a possible reason for its poorer-than-expected
performance, with the authors indicating that its consistency may not be well suited for
use as an intracanal medicament.
In another in vivo study, root canals that yielded positive cultures a week after complete
chemo-mechanical preparation and camphorated paramonochlorophenol dressing were
medicated with either calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine or camphorated
paramonochlorophenol for one week. There were no statistically significant differences
in the percentage of negative cultures obtained with each medicament (Barbosa et al.
1997).
One of the major disadvantages of chlorhexidine is that it has no tissue solvent activity.
It was proposed that this shortcoming could be compensated for by producing a gel
formulation which increased its mechanical removal. This hypothesis has not been
46
validated by the literature. Okino et al. evaluated the tissue dissolving ability of 0.5%,
1% and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate liquid, 2%
chlorhexidine digluconate gel and distilled water. Distilled water and both solutions of
chlorhexidine did not dissolve the pulp tissue within 6 hours (Okino et al. 2004). Unlike
calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine does not inactivate bacterial LPS (Tanomaru et al.
2003).
The prolonged antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine resulting from its substantivity,
has been the focus of numerous investigations. Khademi et al. found that a 5 minute
application of 2% chlorhexidine solution in a bovine root dentine model, induced
substantivity for up to 4 weeks (Khademi et al. 2006). Rosenthal et al., using bovine
root blocks, measured the substantivity of chlorhexidine in dentine after root filling for
up to 3 months. After instrumentation and irrigation with NaOCl and EDTA, the test
canals were irrigated with 2% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes before root filling. No
chlorhexidine was used in the control group. Residual chlorhexidine activity was
measured within the dentine at various time periods after filling, and antibacterial
activity was clearly present even 3 months post-obturation (Rosenthal et al. 2004).
Another potential weakness of chlorhexidine is its susceptibility to the presence of
organic matter. Haapasalo et al. showed the effect of 0.05% chlorhexidine against E.
faecalis is reduced, but not totally eliminated, by the presence of dentine (Haapasalo et
al. 2000), while no inhibition could be measured when a 0.5% solution was used. The
strongest inhibitor of chlorhexidine was bovine serum albumin, with more than 10% of
E. faecalis cells still viable after 24 hours of incubation with the medicament (Portenier
47
et al. 2001). Inflammatory exudate, rich in proteins such as albumin, may thus weaken
the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine more so than the dentine will (Haapasalo
2005).
A suggested clinical protocol by Zehnder consisted of irrigation with sodium
hypochlorite to dissolve the organic components, irrigation with EDTA to eliminate the
smear layer and irrigation with chlorhexidine to increase the anti-microbial spectrum of
activity and impart substantivity (Zehnder 2006). Although such a combination of
irrigants may enhance the overall antimicrobial effectiveness, the possible chemical
interactions of the irrigants must be considered (Mohammadi and Abbott 2009). The
combination of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite has been shown to result in the
formation of a precipitate which has been found to occlude dentinal tubules (Basrani et
al. 2007; Bui et al. 2008). This may interfere with the seal of the root filling and the
combination should therefore be avoided.
1.8.4 Antibiotics
In light of the limitations of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine as intracanal
medicaments, preparations containing antibiotics represent another approach to treating
persisting endodontic infection.
The two most common antibiotic-containing commercial preparations currently
available are Ledermix paste and Septomixine Forte. Septomixine Forte contains two
48
antibiotics – neomycin and polymyxin B sulphate. Neither of these can be considered
suitable for use against the commonly reported endodontic bacteria, because of their
inappropriate spectra of activity (Abbott et al. 1990). In addition, although the anti-
inflammatory agent in Septomixine Forte, dexamethasone, is clinically effective, the
triamcinolone component of Ledermix paste is considered to have less systemic side
effects (Abbott et al. 1990).
1.8.4.1 Ledermix
Ledermix paste was developed by Schroeder and Triadan in 1960, primarily as a
corticosteroid vehicle aimed at controlling pain and inflammation in vital pulp therapy.
The antimicrobial properties were initially catered for by a formalin-based paste, while
the inclusion of an antibiotic component was to compensate for what was perceived to
be a possible corticoid-induced reduction in the host immune response (Schroeder
1981). Today, Ledermix paste consists of a combination of the tetracycline antibiotic
demeclocycline HCl, at a concentration of 3.2%, and a corticosteroid, triamcinolone
acetonide at a concentration of 1%, in a polyethylene glycol base (Athanassiadis et al.
2007).
Heling and Pecht evaluated the efficacy of Ledermix paste in the disinfection of
dentinal tubules. Ledermix was effective in reducing the number of viable
Staphylococcus aureus bacteria in dentinal tubules after 7 days of incubation and after
recontamination (Heling and Pecht 1991). However, its antibacterial effect is limited to
a small spectrum of bacteria. Lin et al. found that exposure to Ledermix for 7 days had
no significant effect on the amount of viable Streptococcus sanguis bacteria in bovine
49
dentinal tubules (Lin et al, 2003). A further limitation of Ledermix paste is that
increasing numbers of bacterial species have become resistant to tetracycline (Goodson
and Tanner 1992). For instance, numerous in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility studies
have revealed a significant proportion of enterococcal isolates to be resistant to
tetracyclines (Dahlén et al. 2000; Geijersstam et al. 2006). Dahlén et al. found 4 out of
29 strains to be highly resistant to tetracycline, while Geijersstam et al. identified 17
tetracycline resistant isolates out of 59 (Geijersstam et al. 2006). The latter study
observed antibiotic susceptibility patterns of E. faecalis isolated from endodontic
infections in Finland and Lithuania to be similar, despite the differing antibiotic usage
in these countries (Geijersstam et al. 2006).
The concentration of demeclocycline achieved within the dentinal tubules and
periapical tissues varies as a function of time and location – the further from the canal,
the lower the concentration achieved and this concentration decreases with time (Abbott
et al. 1990). Abbott et al. showed dentinal tubules are the major supply route of the
active components to the periradicular tissues, while the apical foramen is not as
effective as a supply route (Abbott et al. 1988). Demeclocycline within the root canal
itself is present in sufficiently high concentrations to be effective against susceptible
species of bacteria. In the periradicular tissues and peripheral parts of the dentine,
however, the concentration achieved through diffusion is insufficient to inactivate
bacteria (Abbott et al. 1990).
Chu et al. conducted an in vivo study comparing the efficacy of disinfection of
Ledermix, Septomixine and Calasept - a calcium hydroxide paste. Each tooth was
50
prepared using hand instrumentation and repeatedly irrigated with 0.5% sodium
hypochlorite. Each medicament was spiralled into the root canal and left for seven days.
Bacteriological samples were taken before and after the two-visit endodontic treatment.
After seven days, the percentages of canals with positive growth after dressing with
Ledermix, Septomixine or Calasept, were 48% (13 of 27), 31% (8 of 26) and 31% (11
of 35), respectively. These differences were not statistically significant (Chu et al.
2006). There was a marked similarity in microbiological outcomes achieved despite the
use of different inter-appointment dressings.
Trope et al. evaluated the relationship of intracanal medicaments to endodontic flare
ups. Formocresol, Ledermix, and calcium hydroxide were used to dress 474 teeth in
strict sequence irrespective of the presence or absence of symptoms or radiographic
signs of apical periodontitis. No significant difference in the flare-up rate among the
three intracanal medicaments was detected (Trope 1990). Ehrmann et al. showed that
greater postoperative pain relief was achieved when teeth were medicated with
Ledermix paste compared to calcium hydroxide (Ehrmann et al. 2003). Dentine acts as
a slow release mechanism for triamcinolone to the periodontal tissues, which is the
probable basis of its long-acting therapeutic effect (Schroeder 1981).
One of the drawbacks of using Ledermix as an intracanal medicament is its potential to
cause tooth discolouration. It is well known that uptake of tetracyclines into hard tissues
can produce colour changes. Tetracycline uptake was thought to be limited to periods of
active calcification (Lambrou et al. 1977), but it is now recognized that even fully
mineralized teeth can undergo colour changes resulting from topical exposure to
51
tetracycline (Bjorvatn et al. 1985). Kim et al. found that after 12 weeks, teeth dressed
with Ledermix paste and exposed to sunlight, acquired a dark grey-brown staining. This
did not occur when the teeth were kept in the dark. More severe staining was noted
when Ledermix paste filled the pulp chamber than when the paste was restricted to
below the cemento-enamel junction (Kim et al. 2000). In a similar study, immature
teeth became more stained than their mature counterparts undergoing identical
treatment. This was attributed to a greater number and wider diameter of dentinal
tubules in immature teeth, allowing greater diffusion to take place (Kim et al. 2000).
In addition to its antimicrobial properties, Ledermix paste has important applications in
the prevention and treatment of inflammatory root resorption following dental trauma.
Triamcinolone is a highly active steroid, known to suppress inflammation and have an
inhibitory effect on osteoclastic activity (Neuberger 1975). It was demonstrated to have
a direct inhibitory effect on dentinoclasts (Pierce et al. 1988). Tetracycline has been
shown to possess antimicrobial activity and have antiresorptive properties (Chang et al.
1994; Keller and Carano 1995). Abbott et al. demonstrated that both the antibiotic and
corticosteroid components of Ledermix paste penetrate the dentinal tubules and the
cementum and are readily available at the root surface. The rate of diffusion is
significantly greater when the cementum is absent from the root surface, as may be the
case in the root surfaces of traumatised teeth (Abbott et al. 1988).
Pierce and Lindskog reported that root canal treatment with intracanal Ledermix
introduced 3 weeks after 1-hour delayed replantation of extracted teeth was effective
against inflammatory root resorption (Pierce and Lindskog 1987). More recent studies
52
have evaluated the effect of immediate placement of intracanal Ledermix on root
resorption of delayed replanted teeth in monkey and canine models. Immediate
placement of intracanal Ledermix paste in replanted monkey and dog teeth resulted in
more complete healing and less unfavourable healing including inflammatory root
resorption and replacement resorption compared to root-filled replanted teeth (Wong
and Sae-Lim 2002; Chen et al. 2008). When the individual influence of corticosteroid
and tetracycline on external root resorption was assessed, there was no statistically
significant difference between the Ledermix group and the triamcinolone group in the
degree of favourable healing or the remaining root mass, while the tetracycline group
showed less favourable healing and reduced root mass (Chen et al. 2008). The steroid
component therefore appears largely responsible for the anti-resorptive effect of
Ledermix paste, although the antimicrobial contribution of tetracycline may play an
important adjunctive role. Ledermix paste treated canine roots had significantly more
healing and less resorption than roots treated with calcium hydroxide, and consequently
maintained significantly more root mass (Bryson et al. 2002). These observations
suggest that Ledermix is highly effective in treating resorption and promoting
favourable periodontal healing in delayed replantation cases.
In conclusion, the range of activity of demeclocycline in Ledermix, and the
concentrations of this antibiotic established within the root canal system are not
sufficient to achieve predictable antibiosis for an adequate length of time. Nevertheless,
Ledermix is an effective intracanal medicament for the control of postoperative pain
associated with acute apical periodontitis (Ehrmann et al. 2003) and vital pulp therapy
(Negm 2001). It also has important applications in the prevention and treatment of
inflammatory root resorption (Pierce and Lindskog 1987). These benefits need to be
53
balanced with the clinical concern of possible discolouration as a result of its use (Kim
et al. 2000; Kim et al. 2000).
1.8.4.2 Odontopaste
Odontopaste was released in February 2008 by Australian Dental Manufacturing. It
contains the antibiotic clindamycin hydrochloride 5% and triamcinolone acetonide 1%
and now also comes premixed with 1-2% calcium hydroxide. The manufacturers of
Odontopaste claim that this formulation will not cause dentinal discolouration as seen
with Ledermix. At this stage there is no published data available to validate
Odontopaste as an effective intracanal medicament.
The key antimicrobial component of Odontopaste is clindamycin, which has proven
effectiveness against a comprehensive spectrum of microbes associated with endodontic
infections, including Actinomyces, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Propionibacterium,
microaerophilic streptococci, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Veillonella, Prevotella,
and Porphyromonas (Pharmacists 1998). Only a small number of reports, however,
describe the use of clindamycin as an intracanal medicament.
Gilad et al. found clindamycin to be an effective antimicrobial agent in extracted human
teeth. In an initial experiment using a pure culture of Prevotella intermedia, all seven
experimental teeth treated with clindamycin fibers demonstrated complete elimination
of this organism when growth was assessed by either paper point or crushed tooth
sampling. When the effect of clindamycin fibers on a mixed inoculum was assessed, a
54
significant reduction in Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella intermedia was noted.
In contrast, the clindamycin fibers failed to significantly reduce the levels of
Peptostreptococcus micros. Total bacterial elimination failed to be achieved in any of
the specimens inoculated with a mixed culture made up of F. nucleatum, P. micros and
P. intermedia (Gilad et al. 1999).
Lin et al. sought to evaluate and compare the antibacterial effect of clindamycin and
tetracycline in bovine dentinal tubules infected with Streptococcus sanguis. Following a
1 week exposure, the amount of viable bacteria in the dentinal tubules was significantly
reduced through the use of clindamycin, while tetracycline yielded results similar to
those of controls. Neither tetracycline nor clindamycin rendered any dentine samples
bacteria-free (Lin et al. 2003).
Molander et al. evaluated the effects of clindamycin when used as an intracanal
dressing on 25 teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical radiolucencies. A 150 mg
clindamycin capsule was mixed with sterile saline to a paste consistency and placed
into the infected root canals. The presence or absence of bacteria was determined in
samples taken immediately after removal of the dressing and after a period of 7 days,
during which the canals were filled with sampling fluid. Bacteria were recovered from 4
and 6 teeth respectively. Enterococci constituted the dominant flora in the teeth with
persisting infection. Although there was an absence of direct comparison, these results
indicated that clindamycin was not superior to calcium hydroxide in the eradication of
bacteria from the root canal and its use was therefore not recommended (Molander et
al. 1990).
55
E. faecalis generally displays intrinsic resistance to clindamycin (Singh et al. 2002)
although Geijersstam et al. noted that 2 of the 59 endodontic isolates they tested did not
display the classic LSA phenotype which confers intrinsic resistance to streptogramin A
and lincosamides such as clindamycin. These aberrant isolates were thus unusually
susceptible to clindamycin and a further 3 isolates had reduced resistance to the
antibiotic (Geijersstam et al. 2006). Similarly, Dahlén et al. found 25 out of the 26 E.
feacalis species isolated from root canals to be resistant to clindamycin (Dahlén et al.
2000).
1.8.4.3 Combinations of antibiotics and calcium hydroxide
In order to compensate for its limited antibacterial efficacy and produce a dressing that
has both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity, Ledermix paste can be combined
with calcium hydroxide in a 50:50 mixture. In vitro studies investigating this
combination have generated contradictory results. Taylor et al. found that combining
the two preparations marginally increased the anti-bacterial activity of Ledermix paste
against the microorganisms L. Casei and S. mutans (Taylor et al. 1989). Seow,
however, showed that for S. sanguis and S. aureus, the addition of only 25% of calcium
hydroxide to Ledermix, converted the original zone of complete inhibition to one of
only partial inhibition, thus countering claims of any synergistic activity of this mixture
(Seow 1990). It has been shown that the 50:50 mixture results in slower release and
diffusion of the active components of Ledermix paste (Abbott et al. 1989). Abbott
hypothesized that an equal parts mixture of Ledermix and calcium hydroxide paste is
likely to have more potent and longer lasting effects than when Ledermix is used alone,
and less frequent changing of the dressings will be necessary (Abbott et al. 1989).
56
Molander and Dahlén evaluated the intracanal antibacterial potential of two
antibiotic/calcium hydroxide mixtures against enterococci in vivo. Fifty-five teeth in
which enterococci were present were dressed for one month with either tetracycline or
erythromycin, each mixed with calcium hydroxide. The tetracycline mixture was
effective against enterococci in 22 teeth (79%). In 7 teeth, other microorganisms were
recovered, resulting in a total antimicrobial effect of 54%. The overall antimicrobial
effect of this combination was deemed to be relatively weak (Molander and Dahlén
2003). The corresponding results for erythromycin were 96% and 56% respectively.
Limitations of this study include the 3 week interval between the pre-intervention
microbiological sampling of the canals to determine the presence of enterococci and the
experimental dressing placement. During this time the teeth were dressed with calcium
hydroxide. We are thus unable to conclude whether the treatment outcome was the
result of the antibiotic mixture or the effects of calcium hydroxide alone. The high
prevalence of microorganisms detected in the second sample which were absent in the
initial sampling suggests the high likelihood of contamination, possibly due to
ineffective temporization. Möller highlighted the specific concern of bacterial
contamination in endodontic microbial studies, and identified certain microbial species
which should be suspected to be contaminants – these include Staphylococcus
epidermidis and lactobacilli (Möller 1966), which were identified on numerous
occasions in the post-treatment samples in this study.
1.9 Susceptibility of biofilms to antimicrobials
Spratt et al. used a simple biofilm model to evaluate the effectiveness of a range of
commonly recommended antimicrobial irrigants against monocultures of five root canal
57
isolates: Prevotella intermedia, Peptostreptococcus micros, Streptococcus intermedius,
Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Enterococcus faecalis. Single species biofilms were
generated on membrane filter discs and incubated with colloidal silver, 2.25% sodium
hypochlorite, 0.2% chlorhexidine, 10% iodine or the phosphate buffered saline control.
The effectiveness of an agent was dependent on the organism in the biofilm, and on the
contact time. Iodine and NaOCl were more effective than chlorhexidine except against
P. micros and P. intermedia where they were all 100% effective. Iodine and NaOCl
elicited a 100% kill after 1 h incubation for all strains used. None of the agents were
effective against F. nucleatum after 15 min but NaOCl, iodine and chlorhexidine were
all effective after 1 h. Colloidal silver was generally ineffective.Sodium hypochlorite
was the most effective antimicrobial overall, successfully achieving 100% killing of E.
faecalis at both 15 and 60 minute time intervals. Iodine was only 100% effective after
60 minutes of exposure. Although there was clear evidence of a reduction in bacterial
counts after 15 minutes with both chlorhexidine and iodine, both agents left in excess of
107 colony forming units (Spratt et al. 2001). The results of this in vitro study are
limited by the absence of dentine in the experimental model, which is known to have an
inhibitive effect on antibacterial agents (Haapasalo et al. 2000). In addition, there is no
accounting for the complexities of root canal anatomy nor the polymicrobial nature of
root canal infection, both factors that may complicate disinfection.
The susceptibility of E. faecalis biofilms to antibiotic and chlorhexidine-based
medicaments was evaluated by Lima et al. (Lima et al. 2001). One and three day
biofilms were grown on cellulose nitrate membranes and exposed to the test agents for
24 hours. The formulations containing 2% clindamycin as the active antimicrobial did
not achieve any reduction in the bacterial biofilm, with one formulation actually
58
generating bacterial overgrowth. The association of clindamycin with metronidazole
significantly reduced the number of cells in 1-day biofilm compared to the control.
Chlorhexidine-containing formulations were able to render a portion of the membranes
bacteria-free, and were more effective than the antibiotic formulations tested (Lima et
al. 2001).
Abdullah et al. investigated the variable efficacy of selected endodontic antimicrobials
on a clinical isolate of E. faecalis grown as either a biofilm on cellulose nitrate
membrane filters or as a planktonic suspension. Each bacterial presentation was
exposed to calcium hydroxide, 0.2% chlorhexidine, EDTA, 10% povidone iodine or 3%
sodium hypochlorite. Sodium hypochlorite was very effective against E. faecalis
regardless of the growth conditions, achieving 100% killing after 2 minutes contact
time. Calcium hydroxide was the only other agent equally effective against bacteria in a
planktonic and biofilm presentation. While it could not achieve 100% kill, a greater
than 4 minute exposure resulted in a bacterial reduction of 99.9%. Both 0.2%
chlorhexidine and 10% povidone iodine were significantly less effective against the
biofilm phenotype. The authors concluded that due to their capacity to dissolve organic
tissue, sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide were less inhibited in their
antimicrobial activity by the exopolysaccharide matrix of the biofilm (Abdullah et al.
2005).
A 7 day polymicrobial biofilm was developed on the hemisections of root apices by
Clegg et al. Each biofilm was separately immersed in 6% NaOCl, 3% NaOCl, 1%
NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine, 1% NaOCl followed by BioPure MTAD or sterile phosphate
59
buffered saline (PBS) for 15 minutes. Only 6% NaOCl was capable of both rendering
bacteria nonviable and physically removing the biofilm. One percent and three percent
NaOCl showed disruption and physical removal of bacteria when viewed under the
SEM; however, both gave rise to bacterial colonies when dentinal shavings were
cultured, indicating that bacteria had escaped the effects of the irrigants, probably by
invading the dentinal tubules. No cultivable organisms were found after dentine
sections were placed in 2% chlorhexidine, but when the samples were viewed under a
scanning electron microscope, the biofilm was virtually intact. This was attributed by
the authors to potential fixation of cells by chlorhexidine (Clegg et al. 2006).
The superiority of NaOCl was also reported by Dunavant et al., who found that both
6% and 1% NaOCl were efficient in eliminating E. faecalis, achieving >99.99% and
99.78% biofilm elimination, respectively. In comparison, 2% chlorhexidine achieved
only a 60.5% bacterial reduction after a 5 minute exposure. This study used a novel in
vitro testing system, in which a 24-hour biofilm was established on ceramic coupons in
a flow cell system (Dunavant et al. 2006). Fluid flow is considered a principal
determinant of the biofilm structure (Purevdorj et al. 2002). Smooth, dense and stable
biofilms are formed at relatively high shear stress (Liu and Tay 2001). In addition to
influencing structure, hydrodynamic conditions also influence biofilm density and
strength, which in turn influences the diffusion of nutrients and signals through the
biofilm (Purevdorj et al. 2002) and affects the dispersal of cells from the biofilm
surface (Stoodley et al. 2002). The fluid flow in a root canal system is generated by the
inflammatory exudate that forms subsequent to pulpal necrosis. Studies have
demonstrated that occlusal forces can induce retrograde fluid movement into the apical
portion of the root canal (Kishen 2005). This cyclic influx of tissue fluid into the apical
60
portion of the root canal may promote the persistence of bacterial biofilms in this region
by providing a source of nutrients and exerting a shear force on the biofilm structure.
Single-species biofilms of E. faecalis, S. aureus, C. albicans, P. intermedia, P.
gingivalis, P. endodontalis and F. nucleatum were used to test the antimicrobial activity
of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine (Sena et al. 2006). Ten day old biofilms were
generated on cellusose nitrate membranes and immersed in either sodium hypochlorite
or chlorhexidine for variable periods, with or without mechanical agitation. P.
intermedia, P. gingivalis, P. endodontalis and F. nucleatum were eliminated in 30
seconds by all antimicrobial agents, while S. aureus and E. faecalis were the most
resistant. Under conditions of mechanical agitation, E. faecalis was eliminated in 30
seconds by exposure to 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite or 2%
chlorhexidine liquid, while 2% chlorhexidine gel needed 5 minutes to achieve microbial
elimination. When the irrigants were not mechanically agitated, the effectiveness of the
antimicrobial agents was reduced. E. faecalis was only eliminated after a 20 minute
exposure to 2% chlorhexidine gel, while 2.5% NaOCl did not achieve total disinfection
within the time limits of the experiment (60minutes). It was hypothesized by the authors
that the agitation improved the contact between the antimicrobial agent and the test
organism in the biofilm, resulting in more efficient microbial elimination (Sena et al.
2006).
Williamson et al. subjected a 48-hour E. faecalis biofilm established on a sterile glass
microscope slide to either 6% NaOCl or 2% chlorhexidine, in formultations with or
without surface modifiers (Chlor-XTRA and CHX-Plus). The time of exposure was
61
either 1, 3 or 5 minutes. It was found that NaOCl with or without surface modifiers
reduced bacterial numbers within the biofilm significantly better than chlorhexidine,
although none achieved total bacterial elimination within the experimental time of
exposure (Williamson et al. 2009).
Mixed-species biofilms of F. nucleatum and P. micros showed time-dependent synergy
in growth and resistance to NaOCl. As the age of the biofilms increased, so did their
resistance to NaOCl. Exposure of the 24-hour mixed-species biofilm to 0.005% NaOCl
resulted in no recoverable bacteria, whereas this concentration of NaOCl had no
significant effect on the viability of the 96-hour biofilm (Ozok et al. 2007). This finding
is in accordance with earlier reports suggesting that as the age of the biofilm increases,
its susceptibility to antimicrobials decreases (Stewart et al. 2001). The increased
resistance is at least partly the result of increased numbers of bacterial cells and more
exopolymeric substance. The extremely reactive NaOCl is chemically consumed on its
way into the deeper layers of the biofilm, reducing its effectiveness (Stewart et al.
2001).
Chai et al. investigated the antimicrobial efficacy of 6 groups of antibiotics and calcium
hydroxide against a two-day E. faecalis biofilm established on membrane filter discs.
After a one hour exposure, the antimicrobial activity was neutralized by washing each
disc five times in PBS, and then the colony forming units of the remaining viable
bacteria on each disc were counted. It was concluded that erythromycin, oxytetracycline
and calcium hydroxide were 100% effective in eliminating E. faecalis biofilm, whereas
62
ampicillin, co-trimoxazole, vancomycin and vancomycin followed by gentamicin were
ineffective (Chai et al. 2007).
A recent study observed the qualitative effects of various antibiotics on endodontic
bacteria cultured from necrotic pulps and grown as biofilms on dentine slices. The
biofilms were grown for a period of 12 days, and exposed to 5 antibiotics (amoxicillin,
clindamycin, metronidazole, doxycycline and azithromycin) at their respective
minimum inhibitory concentrations. Scanning electron microscope images of biofilms
exposed to each antibiotic for 3 and 8 days showed that none of the antibiotics had any
observable effects on the biofilms (Norrington et al. 2008). As alluded to earlier, cells
growing in biofilms have been shown to be up to 1000 times more resistant to
antimicrobial agents than their planktonically growing counterparts (Ceri et al. 1999),
so the ineffectiveness of antibiotics used at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) is
not surprising. This was also highlighted by Rossi-Fedele and Roberts who identified
the MIC of plate-grown E. faecalis to tetracycline was 32 μg ml -1. In the root canal
model, where the microbe had presumably established a biofilm, cells survived
irrigation with a tetracycline concentration of 30 mg ml -1, almost 1000 times more than
the concentration effective in the plate culture (Rossi-Fedele and Roberts 2007).
1.10 Rationale for experiment
Biofilm studies at this time constitute a considerably simplified microenvironment to
that of the root canal system, in which complex anatomy, inhibitive actions of dentine
and organic matter and a polymicrobial infection exponentially complicate the
63
disinfective process. Interestingly, in the field of endodontics, the evidence obtained
from biofilm research appears more consistent with the findings of clinical research,
compared to bench top studies. This is particularly so in relation to chlorhexidine,
which has gained popularity as a result of its excellent performance in vitro, (Gomes et
al. 2006; Ballal et al. 2007; Neelakantan et al. 2007; Filho et al. 2008) yet failed to
fully realize its promise in vivo (Ringel et al. 1982). Perhaps this is an indication of the
importance of the biofilms in the endodontic milieu and highlights the validity of using
the biofilm model when testing the efficacy of endodontic disinfection agents in vitro.
The most commonly used endodontic medicaments in Australia are calcium hydroxide
and the antibiotic/steroid combination of Ledermix paste (Heithersay 1984). Recently a
new product, Odontopaste, has entered the market and been promoted as a non-staining
alternative to Ledermix. In practice, many dentists and endodontists empirically
combine Ledermix and calcium hydroxide in a 50:50 mixture. Presumably, similar
practices will be adopted by practitioners who substitute Ledermix with Odontopaste.
No research has been conducted on the antimicrobial efficacy of Ledermix or
Odontopaste in the context of a microbial biofilm. Combinations of these medicaments
with calcium hydroxide are also yet to be tested in a biofilm model, while calcium
hydroxide on its own has only been evaluated in a handful of biofilm studies (Abdullah
et al. 2005; Chai et al. 2007).
An in vitro study was thus devised to test the antimicrobial efficacy of some commonly
used endodontic medicaments. E. faecalis was selected as the test microorganism
because of its apparent association with persistent disease (Molander et al. 1998;
64
Sundqvist et al. 1998; Pinheiro et al. 2003; Siqueira and Rôças 2004; Gomes et al.
2008), and as a means of comparison to other single species biofilm studies (Lima et al.
2001; Spratt et al. 2001; Abdullah et al. 2005; Dunavant et al. 2006; Chai et al. 2007;
Williamson et al. 2009). A dense biofilm was generated to evenly cover the substrate
surface. A mature biofilm represents a highly organized structure which is less
susceptible to antimicrobial effects (Stewart et al. 2001), and may therefore present a
greater and more realistic challenge to microbial killing.
Biofilm was developed on the root canal walls of hemi-sectioned teeth. It is established
that the biofilm forming capacity and its structural organization are influenced by the
chemical nature of the substrate. Biofilm experiments conducted on polycarbonate or
glass substrate will not provide a true indication of the bacteria-substrate interaction on
root canal walls (Kishen et al. 2006). In addition, exposure to dentine has been shown
to have a powerful inhibitive effect on the antimicrobial effectiveness of several key
disinfectants (Haapasalo et al. 2000). The downside of using dentine as a substrate is
that the complexity and variability of the root canal system can represent an
uncontrolled variable when evaluating antimicrobial agents. Results based on such
models reflect a combination of the antimicrobial efficacy of the agent and its access to
the biofilm (Spratt et al. 2001). To minimise the variability introduced through the
complexity of the root canal system, the roots of extracted teeth were sectioned
longitudinally to generate two flat slices incorporating half the periphery of the root
canal in each section, increasing access of the test agent to the microbial load.
Incorporation of fluid flow was a further feature designed to increase the clinical
relevance of this in vitro model.
65
The period of growth of the biofilm was selected to achieve a dense and mature
structure which evenly covered the substrate surface. Recent reports indicate that as the
age of a biofilm increases, its susceptibility to antimicrobials decreases. Ozok et al.
found that a 100-fold higher NaOCl concentration was needed to create a similar killing
effect on aged biofilms than younger ones (Ozok et al. 2007). This increased resistance
of aged biofilms can partly be explained by differences in biomass, with increased
numbers of bacterial cells and more exopolymeric substance (Stewart et al. 2001).
Recent investigations of the topography and ultrastructure of biofilms of varying
maturity indicated a time-dependant tendency for bacteria-induced corrosion of the
dentine surface, production of a mineral precipitate and potentiation of biofilm
mineralization (Kishen et al. 2006). The capacity of E. faecalis to form distinct calcified
biofilms may be another mechanism that allows this microbe to persist in
endodontically treated teeth. The maturity of the biofilm therefore appears to be a
variable with significant clinical implications, warranting in vitro efforts to replicate its
structure.
66
1.11 Aims
The aims of this study were:
1) To compare the efficacy of commonly used endodontic medicaments against E.
faecalis cultured as a biofilm on dentine substrate. The medicaments tested were
Ledermix paste, calcium hydroxide, Odontopaste, 0.2% chlorhexidine and 50:50
combinations of Ledermix/calcium hydroxide and Odontopaste/calcium
hydroxide.
2) To compare the antimicrobial effect achieved through exposure to endodontic
medicaments with that achieved by exposure to a constant concentration of
sodium hypochlorite for varying times.
67
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Organism
E. faecalis was stored as frozen stock cultures in 40% v/v glycerol at – 80oC. 100uL
aliquots were used to inoculate 20mls of Todd Hewitt Broth (Oxoid Aust.). After
overnight growth, the broth was used to inoculate the flow cells. Two strains of E.
faecalis were used: a tetracycline resistant strain ATCC 51299, and a tetracycline
sensitive strain ATCC 29212. Purity of cultures was monitored by periodic plating onto
Todd Hewitt agar (Oxoid Aust.).
2.2 Agar diffusion test
Todd Hewitt Broth agar plates were streaked with the two strains of E. faeacalis. Wells
were punched out in the agar and filled with Ledermix paste. Zones of inhibition were
evaluated after incubation for 48 hours.
2.3 Dentine sample preparation
One hundred dentine samples were produced from extracted teeth stored in thymol,
which were decoronated and sectioned longitudinally to expose the inner walls of the
pulp chamber and canals. They were then sectioned further to a size which
approximately corresponded to the dimensions of the stainless steel coupons in the flow
cell. Following sectioning, the smear layer and any pulpal tissue remnants were
removed by treating the specimens with 17% EDTA, followed by 1% sodium
hypochlorite for 4 minutes each. This was a modified disinfection protocol described by
Haapasalo and Ørstavik, who used an ultrasonic bath and a 5.25% concentration of
NaOCl (Haapasalo and Ørstavik 1987). The dentine slices were then allowed to air dry
68
for 10 minutes, before being attached to the stainless steel coupons using Araldite
adhesive.
Materials and Methods
Nutrient
Reservoir
Peristaltic
Pump
Flow Cell
Waste
Vessel
Figure 1. Experimental set-up consisting of a nutrient reservoir, peristaltic pump, flow
cell, and a waste vessel, all connected by sterile silicone tubing.
2.4 Biofilm growth
A biofilm was established using a continuous flow cell model based on that described
by Dunavant et al. (Dunavant et al. 2006). The system consisted of a nutrient reservoir,
a single channel flow cell, a peristaltic pump, and a waste vessel, all connected with
silicone tubing. The flow cell temperature was maintained at 370C using a heating bed.
69
The flow channel design incorporated circular recesses which allowed for the
placement of 9 stainless steel coupons. Each coupon had a human dentine sample
attached as described previously.
The flow cell, with coupons and dentine slices in situ, was then sterilised using ethylene
oxide. The nutrient reservoir, silicone tubing, and waste vessel were sterilised by
autoclaving at 1210C for 20 minutes and the system was carefully assembled
aseptically.
Using the in-line peristaltic pump, the flow cell was filled with Todd Hewitt broth
(Oxoid Aust.). The pump was shut off and the system was allowed to remain static for
48 hours to confirm sterility. After confirmation of sterility, 10 mls of an overnight
broth culture was introduced into the flow cell through a syringe injection port upstream
of the flow cell. The culture volume remained in the flow cell for 24 hours to allow for
bacterial growth. Laminar flow was then established at a flow rate of 20ml/h. The
volume of the flow cell was 50ml, making the dilution co-efficient 0.4 h-1.
Preliminary experiments were conducted in order to determine an appropriate time to
produce confluent adherent biofilms. The biofilm was developed in a low oxygen
tension environment at 37ºC, and two coupons were sampled weekly over four weeks
for SEM analyses.
70
Materials and Methods
The flow cell accommodated steel coupons with a human dentine sample attached to each one. Once filled with media, E.
faecalis
ATCC51299 (Tetracycline resistant strain)
Figure 2. Flow cell showing coupons and dentine slices in situ
2.5 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The dentine slices were stored overnight in fixative (4% paraformaldehyde/1.25%
glutaraldehyde in PBS + 4% sucrose). They were then washed in PBS + 4% sucrose
and dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol as follows:
70% ethanol – 15 minutes
90% ethanol – 15minutes
95% ethanol – 15minutes
100% ethanol – 3 changes of 10 minutes each
Following critical point drying, the samples were coated with platinum and analysed
under a scanning electron microscope (Philips XL30 field emission scanning electron
71
microscope). The biofilm was assessed for confluence, bacterial density and tubular
penetration of the dentine substrate.
2.6 Test Agents Used
- 4% sodium hypochlorite (Asis Scientific, Adelaide)
- Ledermix (DENTSPLY, Australia)
- Odontopaste (Australian Dental Manufacturing)
- Calxyl – calcium hydroxide (OCO Präparate GmbH)
- Ledermix/calcium hydroxide
- Odontopaste/calcium hydroxide
- 0.2% chlorhexidine gel (Professional Dentist Supplies Pty. Ltd.)
Each test agent in paste or gel formulation was introduced individually into the flow
cell, and applied to cover each dentine surface, while the control samples were removed
from the flow cell and placed into sterile PBS for corresponding time periods. This was
to prevent any antimicrobial effects from dissolved test agents on the control
specimens. The dentine samples were exposed to each medicament for either 24 or 48
hours.
The sodium hypochlorite was in liquid form, and the testing regimen involved
removing samples from the flow cell and submerging them in 2mls of sodium
hypochlorite, while corresponding negative control samples were placed into sterile
72
PBS. The times of exposure were 1 minute, 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes.
Each protocol was performed in duplicate.
2.7 Determining Antimicrobial Efficacy
2.7.1 Biofilm Harvesting
Following exposure to the test agent or the control solution, each coupon was washed
three times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove residual test agent.
Neutralising solutions were not used, as these were not available for all the agents
tested and consistency in the protocol precluded its use for some but not all test agents.
Following washing, the biofilm attached to each coupon was detached by sonication
into 2 mls of sterile PBS. SEM analysis showed that <1% of cells remained on the
dentine surface following sonication (data not shown).
To investigate the possibility that viable bacteria may reside in the dentinal tubule and
were not removed by the surface sampling protocol, dentine samples were exposed to
NaOCl for 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes. They were then crushed using a
sterile metal sleeve and cylinder, and suspended in 2 mls of sterile PBS. An aliquot
(100μl) was placed into sterile saline and viable counts determined. The viable counts
obtained through crushing the dentine samples could then be compared with viability
counts obtained from surface sampling after sonication.
73
2.7.2 Cellular viability and protein measurement
Cellular viability was determined using serial plating onto Todd Hewitt agar plates
(Oxoid Aust.). Viable counts were done in duplicate for each treatment procedure.
Plates were incubated aerobically at 37ºC for 48 hours, and the number of colony
forming units (CFU) per ml was counted.
Cellular protein levels were measured to quantitate the amount of biofilm harvested.
0.9mls of the biofilm suspension used for viability counts was combined with 0.1mls of
1M NaOH, and boiled for 30 minutes. 150uL of each sample was pipetted into a
microplate well, and combined with 150uL of the Coomassie Plus protein assay reagent
(Pierce biotechnology). The microtitre plate was mixed for 30 seconds and the
absorbance read at 595nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski,
VT, USA). Protein concentrations were standardised against dilutions of bovine serum
albumin (BSA) which were assayed in parallel with the unknown samples.
Colony forming units were then divided by cellular protein levels so that treatment
protocols could be compared. Comparisons with the cellular viability in control
biofilms (no treatment) allowed calculations of the percentage kill of bacteria following
treatment with the test agents.
74
3. Results
3.1 Biofilm Growth
Preliminary experiments using scanning electron microscopy were conducted to
determine an appropriate time to produce confluent adherent biofilms.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy images showing biofilm structure at different
stages of development. a) 1 week b) 2 weeks c) 3weeks and d) 4 weeks
Figure 3 shows the development of the biofilm over 4 weeks. At week one, the cells
appeared quite dispersed, with few dense aggregates. Interconnecting networks of
polymer strands can be observed. At two weeks, denser cellular aggregates become
apparent, but the coverage is not confluent. Three weeks post inoculation showed a
a b
c d
75
more confluent biofilm, with thick bacterial growth covering the dentine surface,
leaving small areas of loosely organised cells. At four weeks, cells are present in dense,
multi-layered, confluent aggregations, generally arranged in short chains. Uncolonised
sections of dentine were absent.
On the basis of these findings, the growth period for subsequent biofilm development
was maintained at 4 weeks.
3.2 Dentine surface prior to inoculation
To confirm the effectiveness of the disinfection protocol used to prepare the dentine
sections, sample dentine surfaces were analysed under SEM (Philips XL30 field
emission scanning electron microscope) and are shown in Figure 4. The surfaces
appeared free of debris and microbes, and dentinal tubules appeared patent.
Figure 4 SEM images of dentine surfaces following disinfection a) 8000× magnification
b) 3500× magnification
a b
76
3.3 Effective removal of bacterial biofilm
SEM was used to observe the efficiency of removing the biofilm from the dentinal surface (Figure 5). Following 5 minutes of sonication only a small number of cells remain on the tooth surface.
Figure 5. Dentine surface following the removal of a 4 week old biofilm using
sonication.
3.4 Sodium Hypochlorite
The first experiment investigated the effect of 4% NaOCl on an E. faecalis biofilm
using exposure times of 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 6 hours. Viable bacteria could not
be cultured at any of these times compared to the control samples. An additional
experiment was then conducted to further examine the relationship between the time of
exposure and the level of bacterial killing. These experiments confirmed that total
bacterial elimination occurred at 30 and 60 minutes (Fig. 6). However, it was also
77
discovered that a 95% drop in bacterial viability occurred at 1 minute, and this
increased to 99.99% at 10 minutes of exposure.
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of protein
Figure 6. Effect of 4% sodium hypochlorite on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E. faecalis
biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to 4% sodium hypochlorite for
either 1 minute, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes or 360 minutes. The bacterial
viability, measured as colony forming units per microgram of protein, was then
determined for each time exposure. The data presented represents the averages of
duplicate samples from 3 flow cells.
SEM was also used to determine the effect of NaOCl treatment on the dentinal surface.
After exposure times of 10 minutes (Figure 7) and 30 minutes (Figure 8), dentine
surfaces appeared free of microbes and debris. The dentinal tubules appeared patent.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 1 1 control
10 10 control
30 30 control
60 60 control
360 360 control
*cfu
/ug
P
rote
in
Time (minutes)
Effect of 4% NaOCl on E. faecalis biofilm viability
78
Figure 7. Dentine surface following a 10 minute exposure to 4% sodium hypochlorite
(800× magnification)
Figure 8. Dentine surface following a 60 minute exposure to 4% sodium hypochlorite
(1000× magnification)
79
3.5 Crushed Samples
E. faecalis biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to 4% sodium
hypochlorite for 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes. The bacterial viability,
measured as colony forming units per microgram of protein was then determined for
each time exposure, using both surface sonication and tooth crushing sampling methods.
The tooth crushing method detected viable cells (86) after 30 minutes of exposure to
NaOCl, whereas surface sampling did not detect viable cells (Fig. 9). Neither method
demonstrated bacterial viability after 60 minutes of exposure to NaOCl.
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 9. Detection of viable E. faecalis cells in crushed and non-crushed dentine slices
following NaOCl exposure for 10, 30 and 60 minutes. Data based on 3 samples.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10 30 60
*cfu
/ug
Pro
tein
Time (minutes)
Bacterial viability: crushed vs surface sampling
Crushed Samples
Surface Sampling
80
3.6 Ledermix and Odontopaste
Ledermix and Odontopaste had no apparent effect on the cellular viability of a 4 week
E. faecalis biofilm even after 48 hours of exposure to each medicament (Fig. 10 and
12). SEM analysis of the biofilm following exposure to Ledermix (Fig. 11) and
Odontopaste (Fig. 13), showed an apparently undisturbed, thick biofilm covering the
entirety of the dentine surface.
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 10. Effect of Ledermix paste on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E. faecalis biofilm
established over a 4 week period was exposed to Ledermix paste for either 24 or 48
hours. The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per microgram of
protein was then determined for each time exposure. The data presented represents the
averages of duplicate samples taken from 2 flow cells.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ug
P
rote
in
Time (hours)
Effect of Ledermix Paste on E. faecalis biofilm viabililty
81
Figure 11. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to Ledermix paste
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 12. Effect of Odontopaste on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E. faecalis biofilm
established over a 4 week period was exposed to Odontopaste for either 24 or 48 hours.
The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per microgram of protein was
then determined for each time exposure. The data presented represents the averages of
duplicate samples taken from a single flow cell.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ug
Pro
tein
Time (hours)
Effect of Odontopaste on E. faecalis biofilm viability
82
Figure 13. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to Odontopaste paste
To assess the susceptibility of a different strain of E. faecalis to Ledermix paste, a
tetracycline sensitive strain, ATCC 29212, was used to repeat the experiment. Despite
the use of this strain, no reductions in viability were detected over the 48 hour
experiment (Fig. 14). This was consistent with results from the agar diffusion test,
which showed that Ledermix was unable to achieve zones of inhibition for either of the
E. faecalis strains.
83
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 14. Effect of Ledermix paste on tetracycline sensitive E. faecalis biofilm. E.
faecalis biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to Ledermix paste for
either 24 or 48 hours. The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per
microgram of protein was then determined for each time exposure. The data presented
represents the averages of duplicate samples taken from a single flow cell.
3.7 Calcium Hydroxide and 50:50 combinations of Calcium
Hydroxide with either Ledermix or Odontopaste
Exposure to calcium hydroxide for 24 and 48 hours reduced the viability of E. faecalis
by > 99.9% (Fig. 15). SEM images of the dentine surface following 48 hour exposure to
calcium hydroxide show a disturbed biofilm,but with residual cells clearly present (Fig.
16). The high magnification image shows E.faecalis cells residing within the dentinal
tubules.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ug
Pro
tein
Time (hours)
Effect of Ledermix on Tetracycline sensitive E. faecalis biofilm viability
84
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 15. Effect of calcium hydroxide on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E. faecalis
biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to calcium hydroxide for either
24 or 48 hours. The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per
microgram of protein was then determined for each time exposure. The data presented
represents the averages of duplicate samples taken from a single flow cell.
Figure 16. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to calcium hydroxide
a) at 2000×magnification, b) at 10000×magnification
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ug
Pro
tein
Time (hrs)
Effect of Ca(OH)2 on E. faecalis biofilm viability
a b
85
Compared to the controls, calcium hydroxide combined with Ledermix and calcium
hydroxide combined with Odontopaste, were able to reduce viability of E. faecalis by >
99.9%. This was similar to the microbial reductions achieved with the sole use of
calcium hydroxide (Figure 17). SEM images of the dentine surface following 48 hour
exposures to the Ledermix/calcium hydroxide combination (Fig.18) and the
Odontopaste /calcium hydroxide combination (Fig.19), showed a disturbed biofilm, but
with residual cells clearly visible.
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of Protein
Figure 17. Effect of calcium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide combined with Ledermix,
and calcium hydroxide combined with Odontopaste on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E.
faecalis biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to calcium hydroxide for
either 24 or 48 hours. The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per
microgram of protein was then determined for each time exposure. The data presented
represents the averages of duplicate samples taken from 3 flow cells.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ug
Pro
tein
Time (hours)
Effect of endodontic medicaments on E. faecalis biofilm viability
Calcium Hydroxide
50:50 Ledermix and Calcium Hydroxide
50:50 Odontopaste and Calcium Hydroxide
86
Figure 18. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to a 50:50 Ledermix and
calcium hydroxide (10 000× magnification)
Figure 19. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to 50:50 Odontopaste and
calcium hydroxide (10 000× magnification)
87
3.8 Chlorhexidine gel
Compared to the controls, 0.2% chlorhexidine gel reduced bacterial numbers by 97%
after 24 and 48 hours of exposure (Fig. 20). SEM images of the dentine surface
following a 48 hour exposure time showed a disturbed biofilm, but with residual cells
clearly visible (Fig. 21).
*Viable cells expressed as colony forming units per microgram of protein
Figure 20. Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel on E. faecalis biofilm viability. E. faecalis
biofilm established over a 4 week period was exposed to calcium hydroxide for either
24 or 48 hours. The bacterial viability, measured as colony forming units per
microgram of protein was then determined for each time exposure. The data presented
represents the averages of duplicate samples taken from a single flow cell.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 24 48 48 control
*cfu
/ u
g P
rote
in
Time (hrs)
Effect of 0.2% Chlorhexidine gel on E. faecalis biofilm viability
88
Figure 21. Dentine surface following 48 hours of exposure to 0.2% chlorhexidine gel
(10 000× magnification)
89
4. Discussion
4.1 Antibiotic-containing medicaments
The results of this study indicate that antibiotic-containing medicaments alone have
little quantitative effect on the viability of E. faecalis. Exposure to either Ledermix
paste or Odontopaste for up to 48 hours did not register any observable decreases in
microbial numbers. SEM analyses found a complete inability of these medicaments to
remove biofilm. This was consistent with recent findings by Norrington et al., who
qualitatively examined mixed biofilms exposed to a variety of antibiotics (amoxicillin,
clindamycin, metronidazole, doxycycline and azithromycin) for 3 and 8 days. Scanning
electron microscope images showed that the antibiotics had no observable effect on the
biofilms (Norrington et al. 2008).
A major reason for the lack of effectiveness of either Ledermix paste or Odontopaste is
the intrinsic resistance of E. faecalis to several commonly used antibiotics, and perhaps
more importantly, its ability to acquire resistance to all currently available antibiotics,
either by mutation or by horizontal gene transfer (Sood et al. 2008). A significant
proportion of enterococcal isolates demonstrate acquired resistance to tetracyclines
(Dahlén et al. 2000; Geijersstam et al. 2006) and intrinsic resistance to clindamycin
(Singh et al. 2002). Geijersstam noted that 57 of 59 endodontic isolates of E. faecalis
displayed the classic LSA phenotype which confers intrinsic resistance to streptogramin
A and lincosamides such as clindamycin (Geijersstam et al. 2006). Similarly, Dahlén et
al. found 25 out of the 26 E. feacalis species isolated from root canals to be resistant to
clindamycin (Dahlén et al. 2000). In terms of tetracycline resistance, Dahlén et al.
90
found 4 out of 29 enterococcal strains to be highly resistant to tetracycline, while
Geijersstam et al. identified 17 tetracycline resistant isolates out of 59 (Geijersstam et
al. 2006). The close proximity of bacterial cells within the biofilm readily allows the
exchange of genetic information, including the transfer of antibiotic resistance. Two
strains of E. faecalis with reportedly different levels of tetracycline sensitivity were
used in this experiment to test the efficacy of Ledermix paste. No significant reductions
in bacterial viability could be noted for either strain and this was supported by the lack
of susceptibility to Ledermix paste by the two strains using the plate diffusion method.
This may well be an indication that the level of tetracycline in Ledermix paste is too
low to affect antibiosis. We were unable to source a strain of E. faecalis susceptible to
clindamycin, an indication of how widespread resistance to this antibiotic is among
enterococcal species.
In addition to the intrinsic or acquired antibiotic resistance of E. faecalis, the
organisation of cells in a biofilm structure could be a further factor contributing to the
lack of antimicrobial efficacy of Ledermix paste and Odontopaste. Cells growing in
biofilms have been shown to be up to 1000 times more resistant to antimicrobial agents
than their planktonically growing counterparts (Ceri et al. 1999). This was highlighted
by Rossi-Fedele and Roberts, who identified the MIC of plate-grown E. faecalis to
tetracycline to be 32 μg ml-1. In the root canal model, where the microbe had
presumably established a biofilm, cells survived irrigation with a tetracycline
concentration of 30 mg ml -1, almost 1000 times more than the concentration that had
been effective in the plate culture (Rossi-Fedele and Roberts 2007).
91
Concern has been raised about the capacity of demeclocycline HCl in Ledermix to
diffuse to the peripheral parts of dentine in sufficient concentrations to inactivate
bacteria (Abbott et al, 1990). In this set of experiments, however, even the superficial
surface of the dentine remained laden with E. faecalis biofilm seemingly unaffected by
the antimicrobial effects of the antibiotic. This was also seen with the more recently
introduced Odontopaste. Laboratory and clinical research is urgently needed to assess
the properties of this new product. Its clinical benefit is likely to be derived from the
potential anti-resorptive and sedative properties of the steroid component, rather than
the antibacterial effects of the antibiotic, but this is yet to be supported by evidence, as
are the manufacturers’ claims that it causes no dentinal discolouration (ADM).
4.2 Calcium Hydroxide
Our results showed that calcium hydroxide was able to achieve reductions in microbial
viability of 99.9% at 24 and 48 hours of exposure. This finding was at variance with
reports showing that the antimicrobial effectiveness of calcium hydroxide is abolished
in the presence of dentine (Haapasalo et al 2000; Portenier et al 2001). This
inconsistency in findings is most likely a reflection of methodological differences, with
the present study involving sections of dentine rather than the vast active surface area of
dentine in powder form. Consistent with other reports, calcium hydroxide was found to
be unable to achieve total elimination of E. faecalis cells. The persistence of a small
proportion of bacteria was confirmed through scanning electron microscopy. Many of
the persisting cells were seen to be present in the protective environment of the dentinal
tubules. Similar findings were noted when calcium hydroxide was combined with either
Ledermix or Odontopaste. The combining of antibiotic based medicaments with
92
calcium hydroxide did not appear to elicit any synergistic action, nor did it diminish the
effectiveness of calcium hydroxide when used alone. It is therefore unlikely that adding
antibiotic based medicaments will improve disinfection within the root canal. Whether
the high alkalinity of the calcium hydroxide influences the properties and diffusability
of the steroid component of Ledermix or Odontopaste, and the therapeutic effect
achieved through these combinations has yet to be adequately investigated.
The antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide is due to the release and diffusion of
hydroxyl ions, which produce a highly alkaline environment incompatible with
microbial survival. For calcium hydroxide to act effectively as an intracanal dressing,
the hydroxyl ions must be able to diffuse through dentine and pulpal tissue remnants.
Studies have demonstrated that hydroxyl ions derived from a calcium hydroxide
medication do diffuse through root dentine, but the pH values decrease as a function of
distance from the main canal (Nerwich et al. 1993). One of the limitations of our study
was the relatively short time of exposure of E. faecalis to the calcium hydroxide
containing medicaments. Forty-eight hours may not have been sufficient to allow
hydroxyl ions to reach the deeper layers of root dentine. Other reports, however, have
demonstrated the inability of calcium hydroxide to eliminate E. faecalis from dentinal
tubules, even superficially, after incubation periods of 10 days (Haapasalo and Ørstavik
1987), and 7 days (Heling et al. 1992). It is, therefore, unlikely that total bacterial
elimination would have been achieved had the exposure time been extended.
Abdullah et al. found calcium hydroxide to be equally effective against bacteria in a
planktonic and biofilm presentation. Although this medicament was not able to achieve
93
100% elimination of E. faecalis cells, a greater than 4 minute exposure resulted in
99.9% bacterial reduction (Abdullah et al. 2005), a finding replicated by the present
study. Much of the recent research has been critical of calcium hydroxide, yet in the
context of a microbial biofilm (Abdullah et al. 2005) and in clinical studies (Byström et
al. 1985; Sjögren et al. 1991; Shuping et al. 2000), it has been shown to be highly
efficacious. A possible explanation for its efficacy against microbial biofilms is that
calcium hydroxide is capable of dissolving organic tissue, and is therefore less inhibited
by dense cellular aggregations and exopolysaccharide matrix. Tissue dissolution is a
property that is neglected in investigations of antimicrobial efficacy, probably because
it is redundant in study designs incorporating agar diffusion or bacterial suspension
methods. In clinical endodontics, however, the capacity of a medicament to physically
dissolve necrotic pulpal tissue or microbial colonies is critical to achieving disinfection.
Despite its ability to drastically reduce bacterial numbers, calcium hydroxide failed to
achieve sterilisation of the dentine surface. One explanation for this is the well
recognised capacity of E. faecalis to resist the antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide
(Haapasalo and Ørstavik 1987; Safavi et al. 1990; Siqueira and de Uzeda 1996).
Byström et al. showed that the pH needs to reach levels of 11.5 or higher to exert a
bactericidal effect on E. faecalis (Byström et al. 1985). Investigations of the
mechanisms involved in the resistance of E. faecalis to calcium hydroxide identified
that its survival at high pH was related to the effective function of its proton pump.
When cells were exposed to calcium hydroxide at pH 11.1 for 30 minutes, there was a
20-fold reduction in cell survival in the presence of the proton pump inhibitor CCCP
(Evans et al. 2002). Futhermore, the buffering effects of dentine may not allow a
sufficiently high pH to be achieved in the dentinal tubules (Haapasalo et al. 2000). The
94
biofilm forming ability of E. faecalis constitutes another important survival strategy
(Distel et al. 2002), while its proficiency at invading dentinal tubules affords the
organism physical protection from chemomechanical root canal preparation and
intracanal dressings (Love 2001).
4.3 Chlorhexidine gel
Chlorhexidine gel was able to eliminate 97% of bacteria at 24 and 48 hours of exposure,
making it less effective than calcium hydroxide (99.9%), calcium hydroxide combined
with Ledermix (99.9%) and calcium hydroxide combined with Odontopaste (99.9%).
Chlorhexidine was also considerably less effective than sodium hypochlorite (100%), a
consistent finding in biofilm studies. According to Dunavant et al., 6% sodium
hypochlorite achieved >99.99% elimination of E. faeacalis cells after a 5 minute
exposure, while 2% chlorhexidine achieved only a 60.5% bacterial reduction (Dunavant
et al. 2006). In comparison to these findings, chlorhexidine performed considerably
better in our experiment. This is most probably due to the longer exposure time, and the
greater initial volume of biofilm to which the persisting bacterial load is related to in the
calculations of percentage kill. Quantitatively, 3% bacterial survival may represent a
very significant number if the initial bioburden was extensive. SEM images showed
residual bacteria and exopolymeric material persisting on the dentine surface. This is
consistent with findings by Clegg et al., who noted a virtually intact biofilm after
exposure to chlorhexidine, and suspected the antimicrobial of fixation (Clegg et al.
2006).
95
Chlorhexidine has consistently been found less effective than sodium hypochlorite in
biofilm studies (Abdullah et al. 2005; Dunavant et al. 2006; Williamson et al. 2009).
This is in contrast to in vitro experiments using broth dilution tests on suspended cells
or in models where bacterial cells are used to inoculate an extracted root. Such study
models generally find the antibacterial effectiveness of chlorhexidine and sodium
hypochlorite to be similar (Gomes et al. 2001; Vianna et al. 2004; Oncag et al. 2003).
In vivo studies have generated less favourable results when evaluating the antimicrobial
efficacy of chlorhexidine. Many have found that the microbial reduction achieved
through mechanical instrumentation and the use of an antimicrobial irrigant could not
be improved upon with the use of an additional chlorhexidine medicament, and in some
cases the number of recoverable microorganisms actually increased after a
chlorhexidine dressing was placed (Manzur et al. 2007; Paquette et al. 2007). Vianna et
al. compared the degree of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation
using either sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine in vivo. Significantly greater
bacterial reduction was achieved through the use of NaOCl compared to chlorhexidine
(99.9% vs 96.6%) (Vianna et al. 2006).
The activity of chlorhexidine is pH dependent, and is greatly reduced in the presence of
organic matter (McDonnell and Russel, 1999). Its inability to dissolve organic tissues is
therefore a major shortcoming, and responsible for the reduced antimicrobial
effectiveness of chlorhexidine when challenged by an increased bioburden. Sodium
hypochlorite, on the other hand, acts as a solvent in the presence of organic tissue,
releasing chlorine which, combined with the protein amino group, forms chloramines
(Baumgartner and Cuenin 1992). This tissue dissolving ability is one of the features that
makes sodium hypochlorite such an effective endodontic irrigant.
96
4.4 Sodium Hypochlorite
In this study, 4% sodium hypochlorite was the only agent capable of totally eliminating
the E. faecalis biofilm. Its antimicrobial efficacy was time dependant, with a 95% drop
in bacterial viability noted at 1 minute, 99.9% at 10 minutes, and no detectable bacteria
cultured at 30 or 60 minutes. Crushing the dentine revealed viable cells after 30 minutes
of sodium hypochlorite exposure, even though surface sonication failed to produce any
colony forming units from the same dentine slice. This highlights the limitation of
surface sampling methods in assessing disinfection, such as the paper point sampling
used in clinical endodontics. A negative culture result is merely an indication that
microbial numbers are below the point of detection, rather than a guarantee of sterility.
Scanning electron microscopy supported the quantitative findings, with small numbers
of E. faecalis cells and polymeric matrix substance visible after 1 minute. Longer
exposure times produced dentine walls free of microbial cells or debris, with patent
dentinal tubules. Variable degrees of surface erosion were noted, and this appeared to
be a function of time. Clinically this indicates that sodium hypochlorite is capable of
both eliminating infecting microbes and physically removing them, but its action is
time-dependant. Continuous replenishing with fresh solution and ultrasonic activation
are mechanisms that may speed up the antimicrobial and tissue dissolving action of
sodium hypochlorite (Sjögren and Sundqvist 1987; Spoleti et al. 2003), although this is
yet to be shown against a bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the time required to exert its
effect in the root canal may be reduced, limiting the structural damage to dentine.
97
4.5 Limitations and future research direction
The length of time to establish the experimental biofilm, the limited number of samples
per flow cell and the need to include control and SEM samples in each cell limited the
number of experiments that could be conducted within the study period. As such, the
sample sizes are relatively small and preclude statistical analyses of the results. A flow
cell capable of accommodating a greater number of specimens would be more efficient
at achieving such statistical power. Attempts to use reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-
PCR) to survey cellular viability in samples obtained with sodium hypochlorite were
unsuccessful, and further work to streamline the experimental protocol relating to PCR
is being undertaken. This would be particularly useful in investigating whether E.
faecalis cells adopt the VBNC state as a function of antimicrobial agent exposure.
Live/dead stain and quantitative (real time) PCR would also have contributed positively
to this research. Further limitations of this study are that a bacterial monospecies was
used to establish the biofilm. Microbiological studies using culturing techniques have
frequently isolated an E. faecalis monoinfection in failing root canals (Sundqvist et al.
1998; Pinheiro et al. 2003), although this is more likely a reflection of the limitations of
the sampling and culturing technique than the true state of infected post-treatment root
canals.
The biofilm in our study received a continuous and plentiful nutrient supply in the form
of Todd Hewitt Broth which flowed over the biofilm surface at a constant rate. It has
been documented that certain biofilm characteristics such as density of growth and
depth of dentine tubule penetration are influenced by the level of nutrition and oxygen
concentration to which they are exposed (George et al. 2005). The growth environment
98
in the enclosed cell provided the cells with very low oxygen concentration, but
repeating the experiment with a reduced nutrient supply may have altered some aspects
of the biofilm structure and potentially influenced its susceptibility to the test agents.
The dentine sections maximised the area of contact between the bacteria and the
antimicrobials. An experimental model incorporating root canals of standardised sizes
may have offered a greater antimicrobial challenge.
Saline controls throughout this study showed a measurable reduction in viable cells.
This reduction can be attributed to the removal of the biofilm from its nutrient source,
leading to the death of some of the cell populations. After 48 hours in nutrient-poor
PBS this outcome was not unexpected. The osmolarity of the saline may have
contributed to additional cell damage.
One of the potential concerns of using sonication to harvest the biofilm following
exposure to test agents is that some cells may be physically damaged through this
process. However, this is a protocol that has been used previously in biofilm research
(Chai et al. 2007), without reports of cellular damage. Furthermore, high magnification
SEM images in this study confirm the presence of intact cells post-sonication,
indicating that any damaging influence of sonication must be minor.
99
5. Conclusions
When used in isolation, antibiotic containing medicaments had no appreciable effect
on the viability of E. faecalis. Using a tetracycline sensitive strain did not improve the
antimicrobial effectiveness of Ledermix paste. Calcium hydroxide in isolation, and
when combined with Ledermix or Odontopaste, achieved a 99.9% reduction in E.
faecalis viability, compared to 97% achieved by chlorhexidine gel. The antimicrobial
effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite increased exponentially with increased exposure
time. Total bacterial elimination was predictably achieved at 30 minutes of exposure.
A comparison of sampling methods showed that crushing the dentine sample was able
to identify bacterial viability in specimens deemed sterile through surface sampling.
100
6. References
Abbott, P. V., G. S. Heithersay and W. R. Hume (1988). "Release and diffusion through human tooth roots in vitro of corticosteroid and tetracycline trace molecules from Ledermix paste." Endod Dent Traumatol 4(2): 55-62.
Abbott, P. V., W. R. Hume and G. S. Heithersay (1989). "Effects of combining Ledermix and calcium hydroxide pastes on the diffusion of corticosteroid and tetracycline through human tooth roots in vitro." Endod Dent Traumatol 5(4): 188-92.
Abbott, P. V., W. R. Hume and J. W. Pearman (1990). "Antibiotics and endodontics." Aust Dent J 35(1): 50-60.
Abdullah, M., Y. L. Ng, K. Gulabivala, D. R. Moles and D. A. Spratt (2005). "Susceptibilties of two Enterococcus faecalis phenotypes to root canal medications." J Endod 31(1): 30-6.
ADM website. "www.austdent.com.au/odontopaste.pdf " 2009. Appelbe, O. K. and C. M. Sedgley (2007). "Effects of prolonged exposure to alkaline
pH on Enterococcus faecalis survival and specific gene transcripts." Oral Microbiol Immunol 22(3): 169-74.
Athanassiadis, B., P. V. Abbott and L. J. Walsh (2007). "The use of calcium hydroxide, antibiotics and biocides as antimicrobial medicaments in endodontics." Aust Dent J 52(1 Suppl): S64-82.
Ballal, V., M. Kundabala, S. Acharya and M. Ballal (2007). "Antimicrobial action of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine and their combination on endodontic pathogens." Aust Dent J 52(2): 118-21.
Barbosa, C. A., R. B. Goncalves, J. F. Siqueira, Jr. and M. De Uzeda (1997). "Evaluation of the antibacterial activities of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and camphorated paramonochlorophenol as intracanal medicament. A clinical and laboratory study." J Endod 23(5): 297-300.
Barer, M. R. and C. R. Harwood (1999). "Bacterial viability and culturability." Adv Microb Physiol 41: 93-137.
Barnhart, B. D., A. Chuang, J. J. Lucca, S. Roberts, F. Liewehr and A. P. Joyce (2005). "An in vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of various endodontic irrigants on human gingival fibroblasts." J Endod 31(8): 613-5.
Basrani, B. R., S. Manek, R. N. Sodhi, E. Fillery and A. Manzur (2007). "Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate." J Endod 33(8): 966-9.
Baumgartner, J. C. and P. R. Cuenin (1992). "Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation." J Endod 18(12): 605-12.
Berber, V. B., B. P. Gomes, N. T. Sena, M. E. Vianna, C. C. Ferraz, A. A. Zaia and F. J. Souza-Filho (2006). "Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules." Int Endod J 39(1): 10-7.
Bjorvatn, K., N. Skaug and K. A. Selvig (1985). "Tetracycline-impregnated enamel and dentin: duration of antimicrobial capacity." Scand J Dent Res 93(3): 192-7.
Bogosian, G., P. J. Morris and J. P. O'Neil (1998). "A mixed culture recovery method indicates that enteric bacteria do not enter the viable but nonculturable state." Appl Environ Microbiol 64(5): 1736-42.
Bowden, G. H. and I. R. Hamilton (1998). "Survival of oral bacteria." Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9(1): 54-85.
101
Boyce, S. T., G. D. Warden and I. A. Holder (1995). "Cytotoxicity testing of topical antimicrobial agents on human keratinocytes and fibroblasts for cultured skin grafts." J Burn Care Rehabil 16(2 Pt 1): 97-103.
Bryson, E. C., L. Levin, F. Banchs, P. V. Abbott and M. Trope (2002). "Effect of immediate intracanal placement of Ledermix Paste(R) on healing of replanted dog teeth after extended dry times." Dent Traumatol 18(6): 316-21.
Bui, T. B., J. C. Baumgartner and J. C. Mitchell (2008). "Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin." J Endod 34(2): 181-5.
Byström, A., R. Claesson and G. Sundqvist (1985). "The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals." Endod Dent Traumatol 1(5): 170-5.
Byström, A. and G. Sundqvist (1983). "Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55(3): 307-12.
Byström, A. and G. Sundqvist (1985). "The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy." Int Endod J 18(1): 35-40.
Ceri, H., M. E. Olson, C. Stremick, R. R. Read, D. Morck and A. Buret (1999). "The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms." J Clin Microbiol 37(6): 1771-6.
Chai, W. L., H. Hamimah, S. C. Cheng, A. A. Sallam and M. Abdullah (2007). "Susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm to antibiotics and calcium hydroxide." J Oral Sci 49(2): 161-6.
Chang, K. M., N. S. Ramamurthy, T. F. McNamara, R. T. Evans, B. Klausen, P. A. Murray and L. M. Golub (1994). "Tetracyclines inhibit Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced alveolar bone loss in rats by a non-antimicrobial mechanism." J Periodontal Res 29(4): 242-9.
Chang, Y. C., F. M. Huang, K. W. Tai and M. Y. Chou (2001). "The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(4): 446-50.
Chen, H., F. B. Teixeira, A. L. Ritter, L. Levin and M. Trope (2008). "The effect of intracanal anti-inflammatory medicaments on external root resorption of replanted dog teeth after extended extra-oral dry time." Dent Traumatol 24(1): 74-8.
Chu, F. C., W. K. Leung, P. C. Tsang, T. W. Chow and L. P. Samaranayake (2006). "Identification of cultivable microorganisms from root canals with apical periodontitis following two-visit endodontic treatment with antibiotics/steroid or calcium hydroxide dressings." J Endod 32(1): 17-23.
Clegg, M. S., F. J. Vertucci, C. Walker, M. Belanger and L. R. Britto (2006). "The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro." J Endod 32(5): 434-7.
Coque, T. M., J. E. Patterson, J. M. Steckelberg and B. E. Murray (1995). "Incidence of hemolysin, gelatinase, and aggregation substance among enterococci isolated from patients with endocarditis and other infections and from feces of hospitalized and community-based persons." J Infect Dis 171(5): 1223-9.
Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart and E. P. Greenberg (1999). "Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections." Science 284(5418): 1318-22.
102
Cvek, M., C. E. Nord and L. Hollender (1976). "Antimicrobial effect of root canal debridement in teeth with immature root. A clinical and microbiologic study." Odontol Revy 27(1): 1-10.
Cvitkovitch, D. G., Y. H. Li and R. P. Ellen (2003). "Quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Streptococcal infections." J Clin Invest 112(11): 1626-32.
Dahlén, G., W. Samuelsson, A. Molander and C. Reit (2000). "Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from the root canal." Oral Microbiol Immunol 15(5): 309-12.
de Souza-Filho, F. J., J. Soares Ade, M. E. Vianna, A. A. Zaia, C. C. Ferraz and B. P. Gomes (2008). "Antimicrobial effect and pH of chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide alone and associated with other materials." Braz Dent J 19(1): 28-33.
del Pozo, J. L. and R. Patel (2007). "The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections." Clin Pharmacol Ther 82(2): 204-9.
Distel, J. W., J. F. Hatton and M. J. Gillespie (2002). "Biofilm formation in medicated root canals." J Endod 28(10): 689-93.
Donlan, R. M. and J. W. Costerton (2002). "Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms." Clin Microbiol Rev 15(2): 167-93.
Dunavant, T. R., J. D. Regan, G. N. Glickman, E. S. Solomon and A. L. Honeyman (2006). "Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms." J Endod 32(6): 527-31.
Ehrmann, E. H., H. H. Messer and G. G. Adams (2003). "The relationship of intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodontics." Int Endod J 36(12): 868-75.
Engström, B. (1964). "The significance of enterococci in root canal treatment." Odontologisk Revy 15: 87-106.
Ercan, E., M. Dalli and C. T. Dulgergil (2006). "In vitro assessment of the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide paste with chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(2): e27-31.
Eriksen, H. K., L. Petersson K. (2002). "Endodontic epidemiology and treatment outcome: general considerations. ." Endodontic Topics 2: 1-9.
Evans, M., J. K. Davies, G. Sundqvist and D. Figdor (2002). "Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide." Int Endod J 35(3): 221-8.
Fabricius, L., G. Dahlén, A. E. Ohman and A. J. Möller (1982). "Predominant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure." Scand J Dent Res 90(2): 134-44.
Figdor, D. and G. Sundqvist (2007). "A big role for the very small--understanding the endodontic microbial flora." Aust Dent J 52(1 Suppl): S38-51.
Geijersstam, A. H., M. J. Ellington, M. Warner, N. Woodford and M. Haapasalo (2006). "Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular analysis of Enterococcus faecalis originating from endodontic infections in Finland and Lithuania." Oral Microbiol Immunol 21(3): 164-8.
George, S., A. Kishen and K. P. Song (2005). "The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis." J Endod 31(12): 867-72.
Gilad, J. Z., R. Teles, M. Goodson, R. R. White and P. Stashenko (1999). "Development of a clindamycin-impregnated fiber as an intracanal medication in endodontic therapy." J Endod 25(11): 722-7.
Gilmore, M. S. (2002). "The Enterococci: Pathogenesis, Molecular Biology, and Antibiotic Resistance." American Society for Microbiology.
103
Gomes, B. P., C. C. Ferraz, M. E. Vianna, V. B. Berber, F. B. Teixeira and F. J. Souza-Filho (2001). "In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis." Int Endod J 34(6): 424-8.
Gomes, B. P., E. T. Pinheiro, R. C. Jacinto, A. A. Zaia, C. C. Ferraz and F. J. Souza-Filho (2008). "Microbial analysis of canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions using polymerase chain reaction." J Endod 34(5): 537-40.
Gomes, B. P., S. F. Souza, C. C. Ferraz, F. B. Teixeira, A. A. Zaia, L. Valdrighi and F. J. Souza-Filho (2003). "Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro." Int Endod J 36(4): 267-75.
Gomes, B. P., M. E. Vianna, N. T. Sena, A. A. Zaia, C. C. Ferraz and F. J. de Souza Filho (2006). "In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(4): 544-50.
Goodson, J. M. and A. Tanner (1992). "Antibiotic resistance of the subgingival microbiota following local tetracycline therapy." Oral Microbiol Immunol 7(2): 113-7.
Haapasalo, H. K., E. K. Siren, T. M. Waltimo, D. Ørstavik and M. P. Haapasalo (2000). "Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study." Int Endod J 33(2): 126-31.
Haapasalo, M. and D. Ørstavik (1987). "In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules." J Dent Res 66(8): 1375-9.
Haapasalo, M., W. Qian, I. Portenier and T. Waltimo (2007). "Effects of dentin on the antimicrobial properties of endodontic medicaments." J Endod 33(8): 917-25.
Haapasalo, M., Unni, E., Zandi, H., Coil, J. (2005). "Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions." Endodontic Topics 10: 77-102.
Hancock, H. H., 3rd, A. Sigurdsson, M. Trope and J. Moiseiwitsch (2001). "Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91(5): 579-86.
Hartke, A., J. C. Giard, J. M. Laplace and Y. Auffray (1998). "Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in an oligotrophic microcosm: changes in morphology, development of general stress resistance, and analysis of protein synthesis." Appl Environ Microbiol 64(11): 4238-45.
Hasselgren, G., B. Olsson and M. Cvek (1988). "Effects of calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite on the dissolution of necrotic porcine muscle tissue." J Endod 14(3): 125-7.
Hauman, C. H. and R. M. Love (2003). "Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: a review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances." Int Endod J 36(2): 75-85.
Heithersay, G. S. (1984). "Endodontic treatment in Australia." Int Endod J 17(3): 125-38.
Heling, I. and M. Pecht (1991). "Efficacy of Ledermix paste in eliminating Staphylococcus aureus from infected dentinal tubules in vitro." Endod Dent Traumatol 7(6): 251-4.
Heling, I., D. Steinberg, S. Kenig, I. Gavrilovich, M. N. Sela and M. Friedman (1992). "Efficacy of a sustained-release device containing chlorhexidine and Ca(OH)2 in preventing secondary infection of dentinal tubules." Int Endod J 25(1): 20-4.
104
Hubble, T. S., J. F. Hatton, S. R. Nallapareddy, B. E. Murray and M. J. Gillespie (2003). "Influence of Enterococcus faecalis proteases and the collagen-binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin." Oral Microbiol Immunol 18(2): 121-6.
Huycke, M. M., W. Joyce and M. F. Wack (1996). "Augmented production of extracellular superoxide by blood isolates of Enterococcus faecalis." J Infect Dis 173(3): 743-6.
Ike, Y., H. Hashimoto and D. B. Clewell (1987). "High incidence of hemolysin production by Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis strains associated with human parenteral infections." J Clin Microbiol 25(8): 1524-8.
Kakehashi, S., H. R. Stanley and R. J. Fitzgerald (1965). "The Effects of Surgical Exposures of Dental Pulps in Germ-Free and Conventional Laboratory Rats." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20: 340-9.
Kampfer, J., T. N. Gohring, T. Attin and M. Zehnder (2007). "Leakage of food-borne Enterococcus faecalis through temporary fillings in a simulated oral environment." Int Endod J 40(6): 471-7.
Kaufman, B., L. Spångberg, J. Barry and A. F. Fouad (2005). "Enterococcus spp. in endodontically treated teeth with and without periradicular lesions." J Endod 31(12): 851-6.
Kayaoglu, G. and D. Ørstavik (2004). "Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease." Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15(5): 308-20.
Keller, D. C. and A. Carano (1995). "Tetracycline effect on osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity." Gen Dent 43(1): 60-3.
Kerekes, K. and L. Tronstad (1979). "Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique." J Endod 5(3): 83-90.
Khademi, A. A., Z. Mohammadi and A. Havaee (2006). "Evaluation of the antibacterial substantivity of several intra-canal agents." Aust Endod J 32(3): 112-5.
Khemaleelakul, S., J. C. Baumgartner and S. Pruksakom (2006). "Autoaggregation and coaggregation of bacteria associated with acute endodontic infections." J Endod 32(4): 312-8.
Kim, S. T., P. V. Abbott and P. McGinley (2000). "The effects of Ledermix paste on discolouration of immature teeth." Int Endod J 33(3): 233-7.
Kim, S. T., P. V. Abbott and P. McGinley (2000). "The effects of Ledermix paste on discolouration of mature teeth." Int Endod J 33(3): 227-32.
Kishen, A. (2005). "Periapical biomechanics and the role of cyclic biting force in apical retrograde fluid movement." Int Endod J 38(9): 597-603.
Kishen, A., S. George and R. Kumar (2006). "Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro." J Biomed Mater Res A 77(2): 406-15.
Koch, S., M. Hufnagel and J. Huebner (2004). "Treatment and prevention of enterococcal infections--alternative and experimental approaches." Expert Opin Biol Ther 4(9): 1519-31.
Kristich, C. J., Y. H. Li, D. G. Cvitkovitch and G. M. Dunny (2004). "Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis." J Bacteriol 186(1): 154-63.
Lambrou, D. B., B. S. Tahos and K. D. Lambrou (1977). "In vitro studies of the phenomenon of tetracycline incorporation into enamel." J Dent Res 56(12): 1527-32.
Lewis, K. (2001). "Riddle of biofilm resistance." Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(4): 999-1007.
Lima, K. C., L. R. Fava and J. F. Siqueira, Jr. (2001). "Susceptibilities of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms to some antimicrobial medications." J Endod 27(10): 616-9.
105
Lin, S., L. Levin, M. Peled, E. I. Weiss and Z. Fuss (2003). "Reduction of viable bacteria in dentinal tubules treated with clindamycin or tetracycline." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(6): 751-6.
Lin, S., O. Zuckerman, E. I. Weiss, Y. Mazor and Z. Fuss (2003). "Antibacterial efficacy of a new chlorhexidine slow release device to disinfect dentinal tubules." J Endod 29(6): 416-8.
Liu, Y. and J. H. Tay (2001). "Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture." J Appl Microbiol 90(3): 337-42.
Lleo, M. M., B. Bonato, M. C. Tafi, C. Signoretto, M. Boaretti and P. Canepari (2001). "Resuscitation rate in different enterococcal species in the viable but non-culturable state." J Appl Microbiol 91(6): 1095-102.
Lleo, M. M., S. Pierobon, M. C. Tafi, C. Signoretto and P. Canepari (2000). "mRNA detection by reverse transcription-PCR for monitoring viability over time in an Enterococcus faecalis viable but nonculturable population maintained in a laboratory microcosm." Appl Environ Microbiol 66(10): 4564-7.
Lleo, M. M., M. C. Tafi and P. Canepari (1998). "Nonculturable Enterococcus faecalis cells are metabolically active and capable of resuming active growth." Syst Appl Microbiol 21(3): 333-9.
Love, R. M. (2001). "Enterococcus faecalis-a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure." Int Endod J 34(5): 399-405.
Manzur, A., A. M. Gonzalez, A. Pozos, D. Silva-Herzog and S. Friedman (2007). "Bacterial quantification in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and different intracanal medications: a randomized clinical trial." J Endod 33(2): 114-8.
Marton, I. J., G. Balla, C. Hegedus, P. Redi, Z. Szilagyi, L. Karmazsin and C. Kiss (1993). "The role of reactive oxygen intermediates in the pathogenesis of chronic apical periodontitis." Oral Microbiol Immunol 8(4): 254-7.
McGurkin-Smith, R., M. Trope, D. Caplan and A. Sigurdsson (2005). "Reduction of intracanal bacteria using GT rotary instrumentation, 5.25% NaOCl, EDTA, and Ca(OH)2." J Endod 31(5): 359-63.
Miller, W. D. (1894). "An introduction to the study of the bacterio-pathology of the dental pulp." Dental Cosmos 36: 505-28.
Mohammadi, Z. (2008). "Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review." Int Dent J 58(6): 329-41.
Mohammadi, Z. and P. V. Abbott (2009). "The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics." Int Endod J 42(4): 288-302.
Molander, A. and G. Dahlén (2003). "Evaluation of the antibacterial potential of tetracycline or erythromycin mixed with calcium hydroxide as intracanal dressing against Enterococcus faecalis in vivo." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(6): 744-50.
Molander, A., C. Reit and G. Dahlén (1990). "Microbiological evaluation of clindamycin as a root canal dressing in teeth with apical periodontitis." Int Endod J 23(2): 113-8.
Molander, A., C. Reit, G. Dahlén and T. Kvist (1998). "Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis." Int Endod J 31(1): 1-7.
Möller, Å. J. (1966). "Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth. Methodological studies." Odontol Tidskr 74(5): Suppl:1-380.
Möller, Å. J., L. Fabricius, G. Dahlén, A. E. Ohman and G. Heyden (1981). "Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys." Scand J Dent Res 89(6): 475-84.
106
Möller, Å. J. R. (1966). "Microbial examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth." Odontol Tidskr 74: 1-380.
Molven, O. and A. Halse (1988). "Success rates for gutta-percha and Kloroperka N-0 root fillings made by undergraduate students: radiographic findings after 10-17 years." Int Endod J 21(4): 243-50.
Munson, M. A., T. Pitt-Ford, B. Chong, A. Weightman and W. G. Wade (2002). "Molecular and cultural analysis of the microflora associated with endodontic infections." J Dent Res 81(11): 761-6.
Naenni, N., K. Thoma and M. Zehnder (2004). "Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants." J Endod 30(11): 785-7.
Nair, P. N. (1987). "Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions." J Endod 13(1): 29-39.
Nair, P. N. (2007). "Abusing technology? Culture-difficult microbes and microbial remnants." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(4): 569-70.
Nair, P. N., S. Henry, V. Cano and J. Vera (2005). "Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(2): 231-52.
Nair, P. N., U. Sjögren, D. Figdor and G. Sundqvist (1999). "Persistent periapical radiolucencies of root-filled human teeth, failed endodontic treatments, and periapical scars." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 87(5): 617-27.
Nair, P. N., U. Sjögren, G. Krey, K. E. Kahnberg and G. Sundqvist (1990). "Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study." J Endod 16(12): 580-8.
Nair, P. N., U. Sjögren, G. Krey and G. Sundqvist (1990). "Therapy-resistant foreign body giant cell granuloma at the periapex of a root-filled human tooth." J Endod 16(12): 589-95.
Nair, P. N., U. Sjögren, E. Schumacher and G. Sundqvist (1993). "Radicular cyst affecting a root-filled human tooth: a long-term post-treatment follow-up." Int Endod J 26(4): 225-33.
Nair, R. P. N. and H. E. Schroeder (1984). "Periapical actinomycosis." J Endod 10(12): 567-70.
Nakajo, K., R. Komori, S. Ishikawa, T. Ueno, Y. Suzuki, Y. Iwami and N. Takahashi (2006). "Resistance to acidic and alkaline environments in the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis." Oral Microbiol Immunol 21(5): 283-8.
Neelakantan, P., K. Sanjeev and C. V. Subbarao (2007). "Duration-dependent susceptibility of endodontic pathogens to calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidene gel used as intracanal medicament: an in vitro evaluation." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(4): e138-41.
Negm, M. M. (2001). "Intracanal use of a corticosteroid-antibiotic compound for the management of posttreatment endodontic pain." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(4): 435-9.
Nerwich, A., D. Figdor and H. H. Messer (1993). "pH changes in root dentin over a 4-week period following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide." J Endod 19(6): 302-6.
Neuberger, M., Tatum, E.L. (1975). "The mode of action of immunosupressive agents." North-Holland Research Monographs: 21-91.
107
Ng, Y. L., D. Spratt, S. Sriskantharajah and K. Gulabivala (2003). "Evaluation of protocols for field decontamination before bacterial sampling of root canals for contemporary microbiology techniques." J Endod 29(5): 317-20.
Noiri, Y., A. Ehara, T. Kawahara, N. Takemura and S. Ebisu (2002). "Participation of bacterial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis." J Endod 28(10): 679-83.
Norrington, D. W., J. Ruby, P. Beck and P. D. Eleazer (2008). "Observations of biofilm growth on human dentin and potential destruction after exposure to antibiotics." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(4): 526-9.
Okino, L. A., E. L. Siqueira, M. Santos, A. C. Bombana and J. A. Figueiredo (2004). "Dissolution of pulp tissue by aqueous solution of chlorhexidine digluconate and chlorhexidine digluconate gel." Int Endod J 37(1): 38-41.
Oncag, O., M. Hosgor, S. Hilmioglu, O. Zekioglu, C. Eronat and D. Burhanoglu (2003). "Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants." Int Endod J 36(6): 423-32.
Ørstavik, D. (2003). "Root canal disinfection: a review of concepts and recent developments." Aust Endod J 29(2): 70-4.
Ørstavik, D. and M. Haapasalo (1990). "Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules." Endod Dent Traumatol 6(4): 142-9.
Ozok, A. R., M. K. Wu, S. B. Luppens and P. R. Wesselink (2007). "Comparison of growth and susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite of mono- and dual-species biofilms of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Peptostreptococcus (micromonas) micros." J Endod 33(7): 819-22.
Paquette, L., M. Legner, E. D. Fillery and S. Friedman (2007). "Antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate intracanal medication in vivo." J Endod 33(7): 788-95.
Pashley, E. L., N. L. Birdsong, K. Bowman and D. H. Pashley (1985). "Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue." J Endod 11(12): 525-8.
Paster, B. and F. Dewhirst (2009). "Molecular microbial diagnosis" Perio 2000 51: 38-44
Peciuliene, V., I. Balciuniene, H. M. Eriksen and M. Haapasalo (2000). "Isolation of Enterococcus faecalis in previously root-filled canals in a Lithuanian population." J Endod 26(10): 593-5.
Peciuliene, V., A. H. Reynaud, I. Balciuniene and M. Haapasalo (2001). "Isolation of yeasts and enteric bacteria in root-filled teeth with chronic apical periodontitis." Int Endod J 34(6): 429-34.
Peters, L. B. and P. R. Wesselink (2002). "Periapical healing of endodontically treated teeth in one and two visits obturated in the presence or absence of detectable microorganisms." Int Endod J 35(8): 660-7.
Pharmacists, A. S. H. S. (1998). "AHFS drug information reference." (Bethesda (MD): ASHSP): 398-404.
Pierce, A., G. Heithersay and S. Lindskog (1988). "Evidence for direct inhibition of dentinoclasts by a corticosteroid/antibiotic endodontic paste." Endod Dent Traumatol 4(1): 44-5.
Pierce, A. and S. Lindskog (1987). "The effect of an antibiotic/corticosteroid paste on inflammatory root resorption in vivo." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64(2): 216-20.
108
Pinheiro, E. T., B. P. Gomes, C. C. Ferraz, E. L. Sousa, F. B. Teixeira and F. J. Souza-Filho (2003). "Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions." Int Endod J 36(1): 1-11.
Portenier, I., H. Haapasalo, A. Rye, T. Waltimo, D. Ørstavik and M. Haapasalo (2001). "Inactivation of root canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine serum albumin." Int Endod J 34(3): 184-8.
Portenier, I., T. Waltimo, D. Ørstavik and M. Haapasalo (2005). "The susceptibility of starved, stationary phase, and growing cells of Enterococcus faecalis to endodontic medicaments." J Endod 31(5): 380-6.
Portenier, I., Waltimo, T., Haapasalo, M. (2003). "Enterococcus faecalis - the root canal survivor and 'star' in post-treatment disease." Endodontic Topics 6: 135-159.
Potera, C. (1999). "Forging a link between biofilms and disease." Science 283(5409): 1837, 1839.
Purevdorj, B., J. W. Costerton and P. Stoodley (2002). "Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the structure and behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms." Appl Environ Microbiol 68(9): 4457-64.
Radcliffe, C. E., L. Potouridou, R. Qureshi, N. Habahbeh, A. Qualtrough, H. Worthington and D. B. Drucker (2004). "Antimicrobial activity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the endodontic microorganisms Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis." Int Endod J 37(7): 438-46.
Rakita, R. M., N. N. Vanek, K. Jacques-Palaz, M. Mee, M. M. Mariscalco, G. M. Dunny, M. Snuggs, W. B. Van Winkle and S. I. Simon (1999). "Enterococcus faecalis bearing aggregation substance is resistant to killing by human neutrophils despite phagocytosis and neutrophil activation." Infect Immun 67(11): 6067-75.
Razavi, A., R. Gmur, T. Imfeld and M. Zehnder (2007). "Recovery of Enterococcus faecalis from cheese in the oral cavity of healthy subjects." Oral Microbiol Immunol 22(4): 248-51.
Ringel, A. M., S. S. Patterson, C. W. Newton, C. H. Miller and J. M. Mulhern (1982). "In vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate solution and sodium hypochlorite solution as root canal irrigants." J Endod 8(5): 200-4.
Rôças, I. N., J. F. Siqueira, Jr. and K. R. Santos (2004). "Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases." J Endod 30(5): 315-20.
Rosenthal, S., L. Spångberg and K. Safavi (2004). "Chlorhexidine substantivity in root canal dentin." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98(4): 488-92.
Rossi-Fedele, G. and A. P. Roberts (2007). "A preliminary study investigating the survival of tetracycline resistant Enterococcus faecalis after root canal irrigation with high concentrations of tetracycline." Int Endod J 40(10): 772-7.
Rozdzinski, E., R. Marre, M. Susa, R. Wirth and A. Muscholl-Silberhorn (2001). "Aggregation substance-mediated adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins." Microb Pathog 30(4): 211-20.
Ruoff, K. L., L. de la Maza, M. J. Murtagh, J. D. Spargo and M. J. Ferraro (1990). "Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens." J Clin Microbiol 28(3): 435-7.
Safavi, K. E., L. S. Spångberg and K. Langeland (1990). "Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection." J Endod 16(5): 207-10.
109
Schafer, E. and K. Bossmann (2005). "Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Enterococcus faecalis." J Endod 31(1): 53-6.
Schroeder, A. (1981). "Endodontics - Science and Practice." 44-46. Sedgley, C., G. Buck and O. Appelbe (2006). "Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis at
multiple oral sites in endodontic patients using culture and PCR." J Endod 32(2): 104-9.
Sedgley, C., A. Nagel, G. Dahlén, C. Reit and A. Molander (2006). "Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and culture analyses of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals." J Endod 32(3): 173-7.
Sedgley, C. M. (2007). "The influence of root canal sealer on extended intracanal survival of Enterococcus faecalis with and without gelatinase production ability in obturated root canals." J Endod 33(5): 561-6.
Sedgley, C. M., E. H. Lee, M. J. Martin and S. E. Flannagan (2008). "Antibiotic resistance gene transfer between Streptococcus gordonii and Enterococcus faecalis in root canals of teeth ex vivo." J Endod 34(5): 570-4.
Sedgley, C. M., S. L. Lennan and O. K. Appelbe (2005). "Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals ex vivo." Int Endod J 38(10): 735-42.
Sedgley, C. M., S. L. Lennan and D. B. Clewell (2004). "Prevalence, phenotype and genotype of oral enterococci." Oral Microbiol Immunol 19(2): 95-101.
Sedgley, C. M., A. Molander, S. E. Flannagan, A. C. Nagel, O. K. Appelbe, D. B. Clewell and G. Dahlén (2005). "Virulence, phenotype and genotype characteristics of endodontic Enterococcus spp." Oral Microbiol Immunol 20(1): 10-9.
Sedgley, C. M., A. C. Nagel, C. E. Shelburne, D. B. Clewell, O. Appelbe and A. Molander (2005). "Quantitative real-time PCR detection of oral Enterococcus faecalis in humans." Arch Oral Biol 50(6): 575-83.
Seltzer, S., I. B. Bender and S. Turkenkopf (1963). "Factors Affecting Successful Repair after Root Canal Therapy." J Am Dent Assoc 67: 651-62.
Sen, B. H., K. E. Safavi and L. S. Spångberg (1999). "Antifungal effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in root canals." J Endod 25(4): 235-8.
Sena, N. T., B. P. Gomes, M. E. Vianna, V. B. Berber, A. A. Zaia, C. C. Ferraz and F. J. Souza-Filho (2006). "In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against selected single-species biofilms." Int Endod J 39(11): 878-85.
Seow, W. K. (1990). "The effects of dyadic combinations of endodontic medicaments on microbial growth inhibition." Pediatr Dent 12(5): 292-7.
Shuping, G. B., D. Ørstavik, A. Sigurdsson and M. Trope (2000). "Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications." J Endod 26(12): 751-5.
Singh, K. V., G. M. Weinstock and B. E. Murray (2002). "An Enterococcus faecalis ABC homologue (Lsa) is required for the resistance of this species to clindamycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin." Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46(6): 1845-50.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr., M. M. Batista, R. C. Fraga and M. de Uzeda (1998). "Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria." J Endod 24(6): 414-6.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr. and M. de Uzeda (1996). "Disinfection by calcium hydroxide pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obligate and one facultative anaerobic bacteria." J Endod 22(12): 674-6.
110
Siqueira, J. F., Jr. and H. P. Lopes (1999). "Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review." Int Endod J 32(5): 361-9.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr., A. G. Machado, R. M. Silveira, H. P. Lopes and M. de Uzeda (1997). "Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro." Int Endod J 30(4): 279-82.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr., K. M. Magalhaes and I. N. Rôças (2007). "Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing." J Endod 33(6): 667-72.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr. and I. N. Rôças (2004). "Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic treatment." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97(1): 85-94.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr. and I. N. Rôças (2005). "Exploiting molecular methods to explore endodontic infections: Part 2--Redefining the endodontic microbiota." J Endod 31(7): 488-98.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr. and I. N. Rôças (2008). "Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures." J Endod 34(11): 1291-1301 e3.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr., I. N. Rôças, A. Favieri and K. C. Lima (2000). "Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite." J Endod 26(6): 331-4.
Siqueira, J. F., Jr., I. N. Rôças, R. Souto, M. de Uzeda and A. P. Colombo (2002). "Actinomyces species, streptococci, and Enterococcus faecalis in primary root canal infections." J Endod 28(3): 168-72.
Siren, E. K., M. P. Haapasalo, K. Ranta, P. Salmi and E. N. Kerosuo (1997). "Microbiological findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiological investigation." Int Endod J 30(2): 91-5.
Sjögren, U., D. Figdor, L. Spångberg and G. Sundqvist (1991). "The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing." Int Endod J 24(3): 119-25.
Sjögren, U., Figdor, S. Persson and G. Sundqvist (1997). "Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatemtnt of teeth wtih apical periodontitis." Int Endod J 30(5): 297-306.
Sjögren, U., B. Hagglund, G. Sundqvist and K. Wing (1990). "Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment." J Endod 16(10): 498-504.
Sjögren, U., R. P. Happonen, K. E. Kahnberg and G. Sundqvist (1988). "Survival of Arachnia propionica in periapical tissue." Int Endod J 21(4): 277-82.
Sjögren, U. and G. Sundqvist (1987). "Bacteriologic evaluation of ultrasonic root canal instrumentation." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 63(3): 366-70.
Socransky, S. S. and A. D. Haffajee (2002). "Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets." Periodontol 2000 28: 12-55.
Sood, S., M. Malhotra, B. K. Das and A. Kapil (2008). "Enterococcal infections & antimicrobial resistance." Indian J Med Res 128(2): 111-21.
Souto, R. and A. P. Colombo (2008). "Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in subgingival biofilm and saliva of subjects with chronic periodontal infection." Arch Oral Biol 53(2): 155-60.
Spångberg, L., Haapasalo M. (2002). "Rationale and efficacy of root canal medicaments and root filling materials withe emphasis on treatment outcome." Endodontic Topics 2(1): 35-58.
111
Spoleti, P., M. Siragusa and M. J. Spoleti (2003). "Bacteriological evaluation of passive ultrasonic activation." J Endod 29(1): 12-4.
Spratt, D. A., J. Pratten, M. Wilson and K. Gulabivala (2001). "An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates." Int Endod J 34(4): 300-7.
Stewart, P. S. and J. W. Costerton (2001). "Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms." Lancet 358(9276): 135-8.
Stewart, P. S., J. Rayner, F. Roe and W. M. Rees (2001). "Biofilm penetration and disinfection efficacy of alkaline hypochlorite and chlorosulfamates." J Appl Microbiol 91(3): 525-32.
Stoodley, P., R. Cargo, C. J. Rupp, S. Wilson and I. Klapper (2002). "Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena." J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29(6): 361-7.
Strindberg, L. Z. (1956). "The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: An analytic study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations." Acta Odont Scand 14: 1-175.
Sundqvist, G. (1976). "Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. ." Sundqvist, G. (1994). "Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the root canal flora."
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78(4): 522-30. Sundqvist, G., D. Figdor, S. Persson and U. Sjögren (1998). "Microbiologic analysis of
teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85(1): 86-93.
Sundqvist, G., E. Johansson and U. Sjögren (1989). "Prevalence of black-pigmented bacteroides species in root canal infections." J Endod 15(1): 13-9.
Svensäter, G., Bergenholtz, G. (2004). "Biofilms in endodontic infections." Endodontic Topics 9: 27-36.
Takemura, N., Y. Noiri, A. Ehara, T. Kawahara, N. Noguchi and S. Ebisu (2004). "Single species biofilm-forming ability of root canal isolates on gutta-percha points." Eur J Oral Sci 112(6): 523-9.
Tanomaru, J. M., M. R. Leonardo, M. Tanomaru Filho, I. Bonetti Filho and L. A. Silva (2003). "Effect of different irrigation solutions and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS." Int Endod J 36(11): 733-9.
Taylor, M. A., W. R. Humen and G. S. Heithersay (1989). "Some effects of Ledermix paste and Pulpdent paste on mouse fibroblasts and on bacteria in vitro." Endod Dent Traumatol 5(6): 266-73.
Toledo-Arana, A., J. Valle, C. Solano, M. J. Arrizubieta, C. Cucarella, M. Lamata, B. Amorena, J. Leiva, J. R. Penades and I. Lasa (2001). "The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation." Appl Environ Microbiol 67(10): 4538-45.
Tronstad, L., J. O. Andreasen, G. Hasselgren, L. Kristerson and I. Riis (1981). "pH changes in dental tissues after root canal filling with calcium hydroxide." J Endod 7(1): 17-21.
Trope, M. (1990). "Relationship of intracanal medicaments to endodontic flare-ups." Endod Dent Traumatol 6(5): 226-9.
Trope, M., E. O. Delano and D. Ørstavik (1999). "Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment." J Endod 25(5): 345-50.
Turkun, M. and T. Cengiz (1997). "The effects of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on tissue dissolution and root canal cleanliness." Int Endod J 30(5): 335-42.
112
Vertucci, F. J. (1984). "Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58(5): 589-99.
Vianna, M. E., B. P. Gomes, V. B. Berber, A. A. Zaia, C. C. Ferraz and F. J. de Souza-Filho (2004). "In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97(1): 79-84.
Vianna, M. E., H. P. Horz, B. P. Gomes and G. Conrads (2006). "In vivo evaluation of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue." Int Endod J 39(6): 484-92.
Waltimo, T. M., D. Ørstavik, E. K. Siren and M. P. Haapasalo (1999). "In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations." Int Endod J 32(6): 421-9.
Wang, C. S., R. R. Arnold, M. Trope and F. B. Teixeira (2007). "Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria." J Endod 33(11): 1283-9.
Weiger, R., R. Rosendahl and C. Lost (2000). "Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions." Int Endod J 33(3): 219-26.
Williams, J. M., M. Trope, D. J. Caplan and D. C. Shugars (2006). "Detection and quantitation of E. faecalis by real-time PCR (qPCR), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and cultivation during endodontic treatment." J Endod 32(8): 715-21.
Williams, N. B., M. A. Forbes, E. Blau and C. F. Eickenberg (1950). "A study of the simultaneous occurrence of Enterococci, Lactobacilli, and yeasts in saliva from human beings." J Dent Res 29(5): 563-70.
Williamson, A. E., J. W. Cardon and D. R. Drake (2009). "Antimicrobial susceptibility of monoculture biofilms of a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis." J Endod 35(1): 95-7.
Wilson, M. (1996). "Susceptibility of oral bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial agents." J Med Microbiol 44(2): 79-87.
Wong, K. S. and V. Sae-Lim (2002). "The effect of intracanal Ledermix on root resorption of delayed-replanted monkey teeth." Dent Traumatol 18(6): 309-15.
Yesilsoy, C., E. Whitaker, D. Cleveland, E. Phillips and M. Trope (1995). "Antimicrobial and toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants." J Endod 21(10): 513-5.
Yusuf, H. (1982). "The significance of the presence of foreign material periapically as a cause of failure of root treatment." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54(5): 566-74.
Zamany, A., K. Safavi and L. S. Spångberg (2003). "The effect of chlorhexidine as an endodontic disinfectant." Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(5): 578-81.
Zehnder, M. (2006). "Root canal irrigants." J Endod 32(5): 389-98. Zehnder, M. and B. Guggenheim (2009). "The mysterious appearance of enterococci in
filled root canals." Int Endod J 42(4): 277-87. Zhang, W., M. Torabinejad and Y. Li (2003). "Evaluation of cytotoxicity of MTAD
using the MTT-tetrazolium method." J Endod 29(10): 654-7.
113
7. Appendix
Ledermix
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to Ledermix paste for 24 and 48 hours. The number of
colony forming units was calculated, and divided by the protein levels in order to
determine viability. The percentage kill could then be calculated. See Table 1,2 and 3.
Time of
exposure (hrs)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein (µg/ml) Viability
(cfu/mg protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 6.39 × 107 52.0 1.23 × 106
0 8.99 × 107 52.2 1.72 × 106
24 3.73 × 107 48.7 7.66 × 105 48
24 3.87 × 107 51.4 7.53 × 105 49
48 3.21 × 107 28.3 1.13 × 106 23
48 1.54 × 107 23.9 6.44 × 105 56
48 (control) 8.9 × 106 3.8 2.34 × 106 0
48 (control) 2.86 × 107 32.8 8.72 × 105 41
Table 1. Ledermix paste and tetracycline resistant strain ATCC 51299
114
Time of
exposure (hrs)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein (µg/ml) Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 4.25 × 106 31.5 1.35 × 105
24 1.5 × 107 26.6 5.6 ×105 0
24 1.5 × 107 17.3 8.7 ×105 0
48 5.0 × 106 12.32 4.1 ×105 0
48 1.34 × 106 13.33 1.0 ×105 26
Table 2. Ledermix paste and tetracycline resistant strain ATCC 51299
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 4.19 × 106 12.7 3.3 × 105
0 3.28 × 106 17.7 1.9 × 105
24 4.41 × 106 34.1 1.3 × 105 50
24 7.09 × 106 56.9 1.2 × 105 54
48 5.52 × 106 40.9 1.3 × 105 50
48 5.76 × 106 33.8 1.7 × 105 35
48 control 1.91 × 106 31.9 6.0 × 104 77
48 control 1.74 × 106 17.8 9.8 × 104 62
Table 3. Ledermix paste and tetracycline sensitive strain ATCC 29212.
115
4% Sodium Hypochlorite
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to 4% NaOCl for 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 360
minutes. The number of colony forming units was calculated, and divided by the
protein levels in order to determine viability. The percentage kill could then be
calculated. See Table 4, 5, and 6 .
Time of
exposure
(minutes)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage
kill (%)
0 4.5 × 106 23.2 1.9 × 105
0 4.2 × 106 8.1 5.2 × 105
30 0 17.2 0 100
30 0 29.0 0 100
60 0 22.7 0 100
60 0 21.7 0 100
60 control 1.35 ×106 14.3 9.4 ×104 74
360 0 69.3 0 100
360 control 4.5 ×106 15.38 2.9 ×105 18
Table 4. Sodium hypochlorite
116
Time of
exposure (min)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 8.25 × 106 99.8 8.3 × 104
0 1.24 × 107 74.0 1.7 × 105
30 0 74.8 0 100
30 0 30.4 0 100
30 control 3.38 × 107 181.6 1.9 × 105 0
60 0 64.2 0 100
60 0 32.7 0 100
60 control 1.52 × 107 104.3 1.5 × 105 0
Table 5. Sodium hypochlorite
Time of
exposure (min)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 9.1 × 105 26.7 3.4 × 104
0 2.32 × 106 77.7 3.0 × 104
1 5.3 × 104 21.6 2.5 × 103 92
1 5.2 × 104 70.4 7.4 × 102 98
1 control 6.7 × 106 80.0 8.4 × 104 0
10 9 × 10 13.4 6.7 99.9
10 0 30.4 0 100
10 control 3.6 × 106 37.5 9.6 × 104 0
Table 6. Sodium hypochlorite
117
Crushed Samples 10, 30, 60 min
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to 4% Sodium Hypochlorite for 10 minutes, 30
minutes, and 60 minutes. The number of colony forming units was calculated using
both surface sonication and tooth crushing sampling methods. This was divided by the
protein levels in order to determine viability. Percentage kill could then be calculated.
See Table 7
Time of
exposure (min)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
10 471 73.6 6.4 99.9
30 86 107.9 0.8 99.9
60 0 104.2 0 100
Table 7. Crushed vs Surface sampling
118
Odontopaste
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to Odontopaste for 24 and 48 hours. The number of
colony forming units was calculated, and divided by the protein levels in order to
determine viability. The percentage kill could then be calculated. See Table 8
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg protein)
Percentage
kill (%)
0 6.7 × 106 69.8 9.6 ×104
0 6.3 × 106 44.5 1.4 ×105
24 1.7 × 106 80.8 2.1 ×104 82.2
24 3.9 × 106 62.5 6.2 ×104 47.4
48 2.1 × 106 61.4 3.4 ×104 71.1
48 1.8 × 106 60.7 3.0 ×104 74.5
48 control 2.6 × 106 58.9 4.4 ×104 62.7
48 control 8.7 ×105 55.5 1.6 ×104 86.4
Table 8. Odontopaste
119
Calcium Hydroxide
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to calcium hydroxide for 24 and 48 hours. The number
of colony forming units was calculated, and divided by the protein levels in order to
determine viability. The percentage kill could then be calculated. See Table 9.
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg protein)
Percentage
kill (%)
0 6.2 × 106 16.4 3.8 ×105
0 4.6 × 106 8.3 5.5 ×105
24 112 44.4 2.5 99.9
24 95 40.2 2.4 99.9
48 347 44.0 7.9 99.9
48 60 54.6 1.1 99.9
48 control 4.9 × 106 48.3 1.0 ×105 78.5
48 control 2.2 × 106 29.3 7.5 ×104 83.9
Table 9. Calcium Hydroxide
120
50:50 Ledermix and Calcium Hydroxide
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to a 50:50 mixture of Ledermix and Calcium
Hydroxide for 24 and 48 hours. The number of colony forming units was calculated,
and divided by the protein levels in order to determine viability. The percentage kill
could then be calculated. See Table 10
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg protein)
Percentage
kill (%)
0 9.1 × 106 51.3 1.8 × 105
0 1.5 × 107 49.8 3.0 × 105
24 93 65.8 1.4 99.9
24 145 86.7 1.7 99.9
48 120 50.3 2.4 99.9
48 240 73.6 3.3 99.9
48 control 9.6 × 105 46.2 2.1 × 104 91.3
48 control 3.5 × 106 69.0 5.1 × 104 78.8
Table 10. 50:50 Ledermix and Calcium Hydroxide
121
50:50 Odontopaste and Calcium Hydroxide
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to a 50:50 mixture of Odontopaste and Calcium
Hydroxide for 24 and 48 hours. The number of colony forming units was calculated,
and divided by the protein levels in order to determine viability. The percentage kill
could then be calculated. See Table 11
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 5.7 × 106 29.7 1.9 × 105
0 3.1 × 106 60 5.2 × 104
24 180 71.3 2.5 99.9
24 180 178.3 1.0 99.9
48 4.15 × 103 54.7 76 99.9
48 3.87 × 103 117.4 33 99.9
48 control 1.76 × 106 122.5 1.4 × 104 88.4
48 control 1.02 × 106 73.1 1.4 × 104 88.4
Table 11. 50:50 Odontopaste and Calcium Hydroxide
122
Chlorhexidine gel 0.2%
E. faecalis biofilm was exposed to 0.2% chlorhexidine gel for 24 and 48 hours. The
number of colony forming units was calculated, and divided by the protein levels in
order to determine viability. The percentage kill could then be calculated. See Table 12.
Time of
exposure
(hours)
Viable count
(cfu/ml)
Protein
(µg/ml)
Viability
(cfu/mg
protein)
Percentage kill
(%)
0 1.05 × 106 22.9 4.6 × 104
0 2.9 × 106 38.7 7.5 × 104
24 6.1 × 104 50.7 1.2 × 103 98
24 9.5 × 104 52.5 1.8 × 103 97
48 1.23 × 105 51.6 2.4 × 103 96
48 7.25 × 104 79.4 9.1 × 102 98
48 control 5.9 × 105 38.5 1.5 × 104 75
48 control 7.4 × 105 65.6 1.1 × 104 82
Table 12. Chlorhexidine gel