CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2020 ...

CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2020

WORKSHOP @ 6:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS

ROLL CALL Mayor Tim O’Connor, Dave Creighton, Hannah Bazinet, Jim See, Julie McDonald, Michael

Kampnich, Chanel McKinley

CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, that item may be removed and placed on the regular meeting agenda.

1) City Council Meeting Minutes of December 21st, 20192) Approval of Craig Inn; Liquor License Renewal3) Approval of Thee Treasure Chest LLC; Retail Marijuana Store License Transfer

HEARING FROM THE PUBLIC • Open for public comment• Resolution 20-01, Establishing Capital Project for 2020• Port St. Nicholas Road Annual Plan of Work

REPORTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS

• Mayor• Administrator• Treasurer• Aquatic Manager• City Clerk• City Planner• Fire/EMS Coordinator• Harbormaster• Library• Police Chief• Public Works• Parks and Rec• Parks and Public Facilities

READING OF CORRESPONDENCE • Shaan Seet letter of support regarding Tongass Transition Letter• Thank you letter from Craig Child Care Center• Alaska Permanent Capital Management (November)• Notification of wastewater discharge general permits for Log Transfer

Facilities• Thank you from the home owners of Big Salt/Saltchuck Lane• Letter from USCG regarding VHF• Letter from Council Member Kampnich

CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2020

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 PM

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES • Resolution 20-01, Establishing Capital Project for 2020

UNFINISHED BUSINESS • Review comment letter re: Humpback Whale Critical Habitat Proposed Rule• Recommendations on the Cannery Site Harbor and Upland Development

NEW BUSINESS • Consider Approval of Vehicle For Hire• Consider Letter of Support for SARDFA• Reappointment of Planning Commissioners• Consider Award of bid, Craig Aquatic Center Pool Basin Refinishing

Project

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

December 19, 2019

CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY DECEMBER 19, 2019 ROLL CALL

Mayor Tim O’Connor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and the roll was taken. Present were Michael Kampnich, Dave Creighton, Hannah Bazinet, Jim See, and Chanel McKinley. Staff present: Jon Bolling, City Administrator, Jillian Carl, City Clerk; Brian Templin, City Planner; Jessica Holloway, Aquatic Center Manager; Hans Hjort, Harbormaster; Sheri Purser, Treasurer; Chaundell Piburn, EMS Coordinator; Angela Matthews, Librarian; RJ Ely, Police Chief; Victoria Merritt, Parks and Recreation; Audience present: McKenna Holloway, Rusty Reynolds, Ken Wallenfelsz, Irviug Laugmard, Ron Pierce, Edna Pierce, Raina Bjenel and Jan Trojan

CONSENT AGENDA

City Council Meeting Minutes of November 21, 2019 Special Council Meeting Minutes of December 11, 2019 SEE/BAZINET moved to approve the consent agenda. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

HEARING FROM THE PUBLIC • Open for Public Comment • Resolution 19-20, FY20 Shared Fish Tax

Jan Trojan and other members from the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) came before the council in need of a space for a Post for the VFW. Specifically, they asked to do a non-profit lease 10 year of the building on the cannery property on the corner of 2nd and Main St. There are over 500 veterans on Prince of Wales Island and their need for a location is becoming a necessity. Rusty Reynolds along with other Craig Child Care Center (CCCC) Board members came before the council to ask for a donation to help keep the non-profit organization going. After straightening out their book keeping and their numbers of attending children are down, they are in need of financial support until their numbers are back up.

REPORTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS Mayor/Fire Department- Nothing to report. Administrator- Jon provided a written report. Michael Kampnich had some questions about Waterfall leasing the Pac Air building. Jon answered that the council will have final say on who rents the building.

December 19, 2019

Treasurer- Sheri provided a written report. She added that we have officially paid off a loan from years ago. Aquatic Manager- Jessica provided a written report. City Clerk- Jillian provided a written report and added if the council would like to cancel the January 2nd meeting, now is the time. Hannah Bazinet said she would be out of town, everyone else will be able to attend. City Planner- Brian provided a written report. Jim See asked about the new sidewalks on Port Bagial Blvd. and if the road was narrower. Brain Templin and Russell Dill from Public Works clarified that the sidewalks did not narrow the road. EMS Coordinator- Chaundell provided a written report. Harbormaster- Hans provided a written report. The Mayor asked Hans how the storage building was coming along. Hans said the high school would start building soon. Jim See asked Hans about how the lights are wired on the north harbor since one light fixture has burned out. Hans cleared up that the lights are wired correctly Library- Angela provided a written report, she added that she has 72 kids signed up for the winter reading program and that her after school crafts are a real hit! Police Chief- RJ provided a written report. Chief added that he almost has the new computer programed for the new ID’s. And the jail has been overcapacity for the past 3 weeks. Jim See and Michael Kampnich congratulated Chief on being placed on the Police Chief Association Board. Public Works- Russell provided a written report. Chanel Mckinley noticed that a lot of adults and children have been walking in the roads because the sidewalks have been really icy. McKinley requested that the Public Works department spend some extra time salting the sidewalks around town. Parks and Rec- Victoria provided a written report and added that the bazaars went great! Ballet will start January 25, 2020 and the volleyball league will start in January as well. Parks and Public Facilities- Doug provided a written report. READING OF CORRESPONDENCE

1. Alaska Permanet Capital Management (October) 2. Letter to USCG rearding VHF Marine Radio System

Jim See commented that Jon wrote a great letter to the USCG. 3. From Alaska Municipal League on State Budget 4. Council Budget Report (November) 5. From Community Connections regarding their endowment fund

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. Resolution 19-20, FY20 Shared Fish Tax

December 19, 2019

KAMPNICH/CREIGHTON moved to approve Resolution 19-20, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consider comments on humpback whale federal habitat designation

The council discussed how they agreed with the letter that Jon wrote. Jim See suggested that they send the letter off now and if they have more to add they can send another letter later.

NEW BUSINESS 1. Notice of Port St. Nicholas Road Annual Plan of Work Public Comment Period

Jon informed the council of the process, and how the public can make public comment over the next 30 days. This is just a notification that the process is starting.

2. Request from POW Veterans of Foreign Wars and American Legion for inputon use of cannery property building.

Jim See stated that he would like to see the plans from the Planning and Zoning and The Harbor Committee before any action is taken on that property. Kampnich agreed with See’s statement, but would like to see something done with it rather than letting it deteriorate. If VFW would like to present more detailed plans of what they would like to do, that would be in their interest. Kampnich also brought up, lead paint and asbestos. Mayor O’Connor requested a detailed drawing prior to consideration of a lease.

3. Request for Financial Support Craig Child Care Center

After discussion from the council and more questions to the Craig Child Care Center. Council required a financial report back from the CCCC in January.

RECESS called at 8:29 p.m. Mayor called the meeting back to order at 8:34 p.m.

KMAPNICH/BAZINET moved to support Craig Child Care Center for 1 month for $5,500 with a report back in January. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

COUNCIL COMMENT

Jim See directed Jon to write Thread a letter of concern about the timely process it is taking to get approval that the Craig Child Care Center is waiting upon.

December 19, 2019

ADJOURNMENT BAZINET/SEE moved to adjourn at 9:02p.m.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

APPROVED

ATTEST MAYOR TIMOTHY O’CONNOR JILLIANCARL,CITYCLERK

Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development

ALCOHOL & MARIJUANA CONTROL OFFICE 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1600

Anchorage, AK 99501 Main: 907.269.0350

December 4, 2019 City of Craig Via Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] Re: Notice of 2020/2021 Liquor License Renewal Application License Type: Package Store & Beverage Dispensary License Number: 284 & 283 Licensee: John B McKinley Doing Business As: Craig Inn & Craig Inn Liquor

We have received a completed renewal application for the above listed license (see attached application documents) within your jurisdiction. This is the notice required under AS 04.11.480. A local governing body may protest the approval of an application(s) pursuant to AS 04.11.480 by furnishing the director and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons for the protest within 60 days of receipt of this notice, and by allowing the applicant a reasonable opportunity to defend the application before a meeting of the local governing body, as required by 3 AAC 304.145(d). If a protest is filed, the board will deny the application unless the board finds that the protest is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. To protest the application referenced above, please submit your written protest within 60 days, and show proof of service upon the applicant and proof that the applicant has had a reasonable opportunity to defend the application before a meeting of the local governing body. Sincerely,

Glen Klinkhart, Director [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]



Department of Commerce, Community,

and Economic Development

ALCOHOL & MARIJUANA CONTROL OFFICE

550 West Seventh Avenue, Suite 1600 Anchorage, AK 99501

Main: 907.269.0350

December 27, 2019 City of Craig Attn: City Clerk Via Email: [email protected]

License Number: 16184 License Type: Retail Marijuana Store Physical Address: 1000 Water Street

Craig, AK 99921

Transferor: Thee Treasure Chest LLC Doing Business As: Thee Treasure Chest LLC Designated Licensee: John Wright Phone Number: 907-629-4226 Email Address: [email protected]

Transferee: Thee Treasure Chest LLC Doing Business As: Thee Treasure Chest LLC Designated Licensee: Eric vanVeen Phone Number: 907-738-9554 Email Address: [email protected]

☐ Transfer of Ownership Application ☒ Transfer of Controlling Interest AMCO has received a complete application for a marijuana establishment within your jurisdiction. This notice is required under 3 AAC 306.045(c)(2). Application documents will be sent to you separately via ZendTo.

To protest the approval of this application pursuant to 3 AAC 306.060, you must furnish the director and the applicant with a clear and concise written statement of reasons for the protest within 60 days of the date of this notice, and provide AMCO proof of service of the protest upon the applicant. If the protest is a “conditional protest” as defined in 3 AAC 306.060(d)(2) and the application otherwise meets all the criteria set forth by the regulations, the Marijuana Control Board may approve the transfer, but require the applicant to show to the board’s satisfaction that the requirements of the local government have been met before the director issues the license. 3 AAC 306.010, 3 AAC 306.080, and 3 AAC 306.250 provide that the board will deny an application for a marijuana establishment license if the board finds that the license is prohibited under AS 17.38 as a result of an ordinance or election conducted under AS 17.38 and 3 AAC 306.200, or when a local




government protests an application on the grounds that the proposed licensed premises are located in a place within the local government where a local zoning ordinance prohibits the marijuana establishment, unless the local government has approved a variance from the local ordinance. This application will be in front of the Marijuana Control Board at our September 11-13, 2019 meeting. Sincerely,

Glen Klinkhart, Interim Director [email protected]


CITY OF CRAIG MEMORANDUM

To: Craig City Council From: Jon Bolling, City Administrator Date: January 8, 2020 RE: Port St. Nicholas Road Plan of Work Attached is the draft annual plan of work document for the Port St. Nicholas Road. The council’s December 19 meeting packet included a memo regarding the release of the draft plan of work. As a reminder, the plan of work is required by Section 12.10.040.B of the Craig Municipal Code. The plan of work is prepared by city staff, and published for public comment for thirty days. The plan of work began its required thirty day public comment period on December 20, 2019. The council’s January 16 meeting agenda will includes time for public comment on the plan of work. Staff will collect public comments submitted on the draft and prepare those comments for council review subsequent to the public comment period. No council action is needed until after the public comment period closes. Feel free to contact me with questions.

City of Craig Draft Annual Plan of Work Fiscal Year 2021 - Port St. Nicholas Road

December 20, 2019 This plan of work is prepared in compliance with Section 12.10.040.B of the Craig Municipal Code. The plan estimates the work tasks and capital and operational costs for the Port St. Nicholas Road as defined at 12.10.090 of the CMC. Section I – Description of Work Tasks & Estimated Costs Task 1: Grading Gravel Surface Grading to be performed a minimum of thirteen times and spot grading as needed for the fiscal year 2021. The Public Works Department has estimated a minimum of 260 operation hours, and 1300 tons of 1.5” minus surface material to accomplish basic grading operations.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalMotor grader HR 175 $164.37 $28,765Roller HR 85 $83.24 $7,0751.5" minus TON 1,300 $18.50 $24,050

TOTAL $59,890 Task 2: Culvert Maintenance Culvert cleaning and drainage ditch debris cleanup as needed, approximately 60 hours.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalBackhoe HR 60 $104.26 $6,256Dump Truck HR 60 $139.45 $8,3671.5" minus TON 0 $18.50 $0Pit Run TON 0 $12.50 $03" Jaw Run TON 0 $15.80 $0Corrugated pipe FT 0 $28.94 $0

Total $14,623

Task 3: Asphalt Maintenance No specific asphalt maintenance work is planned for the period. Task 4: Snow removal and Sanding Sanding the road surface requires a minimum of two cubic yards of material to sand 1.5 miles of paved road. Sanding may be performed up to twice a day depending on road conditions. Estimates are based on an average of 10 snow days.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalDump Truck HR 20 $139.45 $2,789Sand TON 50 $22.50 $1,125

TOTAL $3,914

Draft Annual Plan of Work Fiscal Year 2021 Port St. Nicholas Road Page 2 Task 5: Striping Cost based on estimate from striping contractor, plus preparation costs.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalStriping FT 17,300 $1.35 $23,355Sweeping HR 4 $120.74 $483

Total $23,838

Task 6: Bridge Maintenance There are three minor maintenance tasks planned.

• Remove gravel and debris from the shoulders of the deck to allow water drainage; • Clean compression joints and install seals at abutments; • Cut brush and trees around and under bridge.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalBrush removal HR 1 $109.00 $109Expansion joint Stick 10 $134.00 $1,340Labor HR 8 $49.00 $392

Total $1,841

Task 7: Guard Rail Maintenance No maintenance service associated with this infrastructure component. Task 8: Shoulder Brushing Estimate clearing production rate is five operation hours per mile. Use of a brusher is incorporated into the production rate.

Equipment & Labor Units Quantity Rate TotalBrushing MILE 3.3 $531.25 $1,753

Section II – Budget & Allocation of Costs Among Lots The table below shows the sum total used to estimate the fee for the work described in this report.

Task Description Cost1 Grading $59,8902 Culvert maintenance $14,6233 Asphalt maintenance $04 Snow removal & sanding $3,9145 Striping $23,8386 Bridge Maintenance $1,8417 Guardrail maintenance $08 Shoulder brushing $1,753

Total $105,859

Draft Annual Plan of Work Fiscal Year 2021 Port St. Nicholas Road Page 3 Section 12.10.020 of the CMC calls for applying 45 percent of costs among the lots subject to the annual road maintenance and improvement fee, with a maximum of $150 per lot. Applying the cost allocation found at CMC 12.10.020, the projected cost for the work period will reach the $150 per lot maximum, as shown in the table below.

EstimatedSubject Estimated Cost per Maximum Fee

Lots Costs Lot @ 45% per lot180 $105,859 $265 $150

Section III. Summary Per CMC 12.10.040.B, this Annual Plan of Work estimates the range and costs of work tasks, as well as the number of lots subject to the road maintenance fee. Actual costs and number of subject lots will be reported to the Craig City Council in a subsequent Annual Maintenance Report required at CMC 12.10.040.A. Section IV. Public Review and Comment Per CMC 12.10.040.B, this Annual Plan of Work is subject to public review and comment for 30 days, at which time the city council will consider all comments received during the public notice period. Comments are due to the city by 5:00 p.m. Monday, January 20, 2020. Comments may be sent via US Mail to City of Craig PO Box 725 Craig, AK 99921, or by e-mail to [email protected]. Comments may be made in person at the Craig city council meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 16, 2020. The meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Craig city council chambers. For more information, call 826-3275, or stop by city hall.



To: Craig City Council From: Jon Bolling, City Administrator Date: January 9, 2020 RE: January Staff Report

1. Downtown Harbor Project – Breakwater Financing I met via telephone with the attorney who has worked as the city’s bond counsel in prior financing projects. We discuss financing options for the match needed for the breakwater phase of the project. She produced a timeline to secure financing for the needed matching funds. I intend to continue efforts to secure loan proposals from commercial banks while also considering options for use of the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank. The purpose of this effort is to secure the best possible financing terms for the City of Craig. Our discussions also included issues regarding public ownership and beneficial use of the breakwaters, a matter that at first blush may require some future negotiations with the Army Corps of Engineers.

2. US Coast Guard VHF Site Operability Included in the January 16 meeting packet under Reading of Correspondence is a letter from a US Coast Guard officer responding to the city’s comments concerning operability of the Coast Guard-operated regional VHF system. I saw in a recent news article that the Coast Guard has contracted with a new company to provide maintenance services to the multiple remote VHF sites in Southeast Alaska. There is no word from the USCG as to when the VHF system will again be in good working order.

3. Port St. Nicholas Road Fee Litigation We continue to await a decision from the superior court judge on whether to grant the city’s request for summary judgement on the complaint filed by the plaintiffs. A recent notice from the court to the parties advised that the court hopes to issue a decision later this month.

4. Remote Seller Sales Tax Project To reiterate last month’s report on this topic: The Alaska Municipal League continues to work on documentation to establish what it calls its remote sellers program, which is intended to ensure that online retailers collect local sales tax from online retail transactions. The council has already had an initial look at the organizational documents. AML should have some additional documentation for its members to review soon. Once they are available I will schedule the matter for additional council consideration. This item requires our close and ongoing attention in order to best position the city to collect sales tax on on-line retail transactions.

5. Financial Audit The city’s independent auditor, Ms. Christine Harrington, CPA, was in Craig recently to work on the Fiscal Year 2019 financial audit. Ms. Harrington plans to return to Craig later this month to complete the audit field work.

6. Other Projects City staff is busy working simultaneously on a number of projects, including the first responder volunteer award structure, soliciting bids for surveying work, the harbor needs assessment

January 2020 Staff Report Page 2 project, solicitation of proposals for a process review at the water treatment plant, purchase of a new soda ash machine, and other tasks.

7. Access Easement to WWTP Shaan-See Inc. President/General Manager Ed Douville and I met on January 7. Among the items of work was completing the easement agreement securing city-employee access to the city’s wastewater treatment plant from the Cemetery Island Road. I think we have the final terms worked out now. I hope to sign the easement agreement this month.

8. Mariculture Site at Doyle Bay Earlier today Mayor O’Connor , Councilman Kampnich, and I accompanied Mr. Markos Scheer and Dr. Tiffany Stephens to Premium Aquatic’s kelp mariculture site at Doyle Bay, near Craig. The facility is a sizable array of buoys that support submerged lines planted with kelp “seedlings” that the company plans to harvest in several months. If all goes well, the business hopes to secure permits to add sites at Madre de Dios Island, and in Port Real Marina. Those of you who have been on the council for a year or more may recall a presentation Mr. Scheer made to the city regarding his company’s aquaculture plans. In addition to kelp, the company may begin raising oysters on at least one of the local sites. On a related note, the City of Craig will host several officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) later in January. The group is made up of officials whose duties are to focus on developing/promoting seaweed and kelp mariculture development policies. The group will visit the Doyle Bay site and meet afterward in Craig to discuss aquaculture development around POW and Southeast Alaska.

9. Travel Schedule February 3-6: To Juneau for SE Conference Mid-Session Summit.

City of Craig Memorandum

To: City Mayor & City Council

From: Sheri Purser, Treasurer

Date: January 9, 2020

RE: Monthly Report

The January monthly financial reports are included in this report.

With the amount of snow we have received at the beginning of the season, we ran out of the ice cutter and sand quickly. There will be an increase in purchasing ice cutter, sand, and over time man hours which was not expected.

If you have any questions please contact me at [email protected]


City of CraigCash Balances

12/31/2019

General Fund

Deposit Clearing Account 29,861.98Checking - First Bank 1,819,324.58Checking - Wells Fargo (28,330.56)Petty Cash 300.00Petty Cash-Harbors 200.00Petty Cash- Aquatic Center 250.00Petty Cash - Police 150.00Petty Cash- Library 50.00Specail Recreation Savings 1,941.55Wells Fargo CD Saving Account 2,300,000.00

Total 4,123,747.55Restricted Fund

Cash, , Police Fund 384.67Cash Evidence, Police 4,409.30Police Petty Cash 781.17Cash Equipment Fund 451,883.30Cash Hatchery Salmon Derby 17,447.22MM Park Funds 7,697.08Fish Quota Funds 15,500.41MM POW Clinic Funds 24,988.13MM Invest Muni Land 567,676.81Hatchery Saving Account 37,768.62Cash MMkt NFR -School FB 311,314.84Cash Invest School Funds APCM 3,385,188.62Accrued Interest, School 9,484.00

Total 4,834,524.17Endowment

Cash Held Endowment 31,817.60CD Invest, Endowment 505,486.01Fixed Inc. Investment Endowment 3,443,432.03Accr. Int., Endowment 18,569.00Equity Invest., Endowment 4,349,793.07Unrealized Gain/Loss Endowment 53,985.66Unrealized Gain/Loss Equity, Endowment 2,561,812.91

Total 10,964,896.28Enterprise Fund

Water & Wastewater Cash 4,469.55DNR Performance CD 8,500.00

Total 12,969.55

City of Craig, Inc.02. Craig Gov RevenueDecember 31, 2019 M-T-D

ActualY-T-DActual Budget Variance

% ofBudget

01 00.4000.00 000 Property Tax 0 658,478 (655,300) 1,313,778 (100)01 00.4050.00 000 Sales Tax 33,110 1,130,547 (1,613,250) 2,743,797 (70)01 00.4060.00 000 Liquor Sales Tax 2,627 74,031 (120,000) 194,031 (62)01 00.4065.00 000 Transient Room Tax 0 23,828 (30,000) 53,828 (79)01 00.4080.00 000 Sales Tax Penalties 0 102 0 102 0Total Local Taxes 35,737 1,886,986 (2,418,550) 4,305,536 (78)

01 00.4100.00 000 Property PILT Funding 0 312,174 (289,500) 601,674 (108)01 00.4110.00 000 State Revenue Sharing 0 90,507 (90,019) 180,526 (101)01 00.4111.00 000 Liquor Revenue Sharing 0 1,000 (4,000) 5,000 (25)01 00.4112.00 000 Fish Bus Tax - DOR 144,432 144,432 (80,000) 224,432 (181)01 00.4120.00 000 Shared Fish Tax - DCED 0 0 (4,000) 4,000 0Total State Revenue 144,432 548,113 (467,519) 1,015,632 (117)

01 00.4220.00 000 EMS Service Fees 0 25,974 (60,000) 85,974 (43)01 00.4250.00 000 EMS Training Fees 0 0 (1,000) 1,000 001 00.4255.00 000 EMS Estimated NonCollectable 0 0 30,000 (30,000) 001 00.4260.00 000 Aquatic Center Revenue 5,345 32,908 (55,000) 87,908 (60)01 00.4270.00 000 Library Fees 0 951 (1,000) 1,951 (95)01 00.4275.00 000 Recreation Revenue 2,139 8,899 (17,000) 25,899 (52)01 00.4280.00 000 Senior Card Fees 0 650 (3,000) 3,650 (22)01 00.4620.00 000 Taxi Permit Fees 0 0 (100) 100 001 00.4640.00 000 Building Permit Fees 30 600 0 600 001 00.4644.00 000 Access Permit Fees 0 6,236 (8,000) 14,236 (78)01 00.4646.00 000 PSN Road Maintenance 0 0 (18,000) 18,000 0Total Permits & Fees 7,514 76,218 (133,100) 209,318 (57)

01 00.4300.00 000 Property Lease/Rentals 3,042 24,443 (72,000) 96,443 (34)01 00.4310.00 000 Equipment Rentals 0 (50) 0 (50) 001 00.4400.00 000 Material Sales 0 0 (1,000) 1,000 001 00.4410.00 000 Equipment Sales 0 6,620 0 6,620 001 00.4450.00 000 K Salmon Hatchery Support 0 8,500 0 8,500 0Total Local Revenue 3,042 39,513 (73,000) 112,513 (54)

01 00.4700.00 000 Police-Fines,Citation 950 3,241 (10,000) 13,241 (32)01 00.4703.00 000 Motor Vehicle Commision 3,039 34,930 (60,000) 94,930 (58)01 00.4650.00 000 State Trooper Dispatch 0 4,625 (7,200) 11,825 (64)01 00.4660.00 000 State Jail Contract Revenue 0 89,381 (357,524) 446,905 (25)01 00.4665.00 000 Klawock Dispatch 4,424 26,544 (53,088) 79,632 (50)01 00.4670.00 000 Forest Service Dispatch 0 0 (3,000) 3,000 0Total Public Safety Funds 8,413 158,721 (490,812) 649,533 (32)

01 00.4800.00 000 Interest Income (CKNG & CD) 0 0 (34,000) 34,000 001 00.4820.00 000 Interest Income (A/R) 145 1,088 (1,000) 2,088 (109)01 00.4900.00 000 Misc Revenue 226 4,765 (5,000) 9,765 (95)01 00.4910.00 000 Donations Received 1,000 1,010 0 1,010 0Total Other Revenue 1,371 6,863 (40,000) 46,863 (17)

Total Revenues 200,509$ 2,716,414$ (3,622,981)$ 6,339,395$ (75)$

City of Craig, Inc.Revenue and Expense YTD & BudgetDecember 31, 2019 Y-T-D

ActualY-T-D

Encumbrance TotalY-T-DBudget

RevisedBudget

BudgetChange

Administration

Total Personnel Expenditures 156,125 0 156,125 331,058 0 (331,058)Total Benefits Expeditures 54,453 0 54,453 134,503 0 (134,503)Total Contract Expenditures 83,601 3,295 86,895 142,550 0 (142,550)Total Travel & Expenditures 13,148 2,372 15,520 11,745 0 (11,745)Total Materials Expenditures 12,082 1,028 13,110 9,500 0 (9,500)Total Utilties Expenditures 6,634 0 6,634 19,592 0 (19,592)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 753 0 753 3,260 0 (3,260)Total Other Expenditures 17,291 0 17,291 25,778 0 (25,778)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 199 (199) 0 6,000 0 (6,000)Total Expenditures 344,286$ 6,496$ 350,781$ 683,986$ 0$ (683,986)$

Excess Revenue Over (Under)Expenditures

(344,286)$ (6,496)$ (350,781)$ (683,986)$ 0$ 683,986$

Council

Total Personnel Expenditures 4,593 0 4,593 13,500 0 (13,500)Total Benefits Expeditures 3,882 0 3,882 17,634 0 (17,634)Total Contract Expenditures 550 0 550 950 0 (950)Total Travel & Expenditures 5,663 1,665 7,328 2,050 0 (2,050)Total Materials Expenditures 183 0 183 0 0 0Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 220 0 (220)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 14,871$ 1,665$ 16,536$ 34,354$ 0$ (34,354)$


(14,871)$ (1,665)$ (16,536)$ (34,354)$ 0$ 34,354$

PlanningTotal Revenues 17,709$ 0$ 17,709$ 0$ 0$ 0$

Total Personnel Expenditures 34,045 0 34,045 45,759 0 (45,759)Total Benefits Expeditures 10,113 0 10,113 17,694 0 (17,694)Total Contract Expenditures 6,936 12,579 19,515 5,800 0 (5,800)Total Travel & Expenditures 604 0 604 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 726 0 726 1,000 0 (1,000)Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 601 0 601 765 0 (765)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 53,025$ 12,579$ 65,604$ 71,018$ 0$ (71,018)$


(35,316)$ (12,579)$ (47,895)$ (71,018)$ 0$ 71,018$

Parks &Facilities

Total Personnel Expenditures 67,774 0 67,774 124,005 0 (124,005)Total Benefits Expeditures 27,701 0 27,701 69,459 0 (69,459)Total Contract Expenditures 3,734 61 3,795 7,800 0 (7,800)Total Travel & Expenditures 119 0 119 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 13,364 2,048 15,412 16,200 0 (16,200)Total Utilties Expenditures 7,264 0 7,264 16,609 0 (16,609)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 10,000 0 (10,000)Total Other Expenditures 816 (819) (3) 11,968 0 (11,968)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 13,400 0 (13,400)Total Expenditures 120,772$ 1,290$ 122,062$ 269,441$ 0$ (269,441)$


ActualY-T-D


RevisedBudget

BudgetChange


(120,772)$ (1,290)$ (122,062)$ (269,441)$ 0$ 269,441$

Public Works

Total Personnel Expenditures 67,024 0 67,024 153,242 0 (153,242)Total Benefits Expeditures 37,288 0 37,288 107,017 0 (107,017)Total Contract Expenditures 47 0 47 8,220 0 (8,220)Total Travel & Expenditures 166 0 166 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 59,219 6,744 65,963 25,750 0 (25,750)Total Utilties Expenditures 4,925 0 4,925 18,986 0 (18,986)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 31,177 5,503 36,680 25,000 0 (25,000)Total Other Expenditures 10 0 10 7,798 0 (7,798)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 199,856$ 12,247$ 212,103$ 346,013$ 0$ (346,013)$


(199,856)$ (12,247)$ (212,103)$ (346,013)$ 0$ 346,013$

Police

Total Personnel Expenditures 253,453 0 253,453 549,338 0 (549,338)Total Benefits Expeditures 120,010 0 120,010 321,619 0 (321,619)Total Contract Expenditures 158 0 158 3,825 0 (3,825)Total Travel & Expenditures 776 1,643 2,419 5,350 0 (5,350)Total Materials Expenditures 19,335 16,790 36,125 43,000 0 (43,000)Total Utilties Expenditures 8,328 0 8,328 29,742 0 (29,742)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 105 0 105 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures (25,111) 7,595 (17,516) 29,714 0 (29,714)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 40,000 0 (40,000)Total Expenditures 377,054$ 26,028$ 403,082$ 1,022,588$ 0$ (1,022,588)$


(377,054)$ (26,028)$ (403,082)$ (1,022,588)$ 0$ 1,022,588$

EMS

Total Personnel Expenditures 61,233 0 61,233 106,493 0 (106,493)Total Benefits Expeditures 20,610 0 20,610 57,661 0 (57,661)Total Contract Expenditures 4,447 2,000 6,447 3,400 0 (3,400)Total Travel & Expenditures 0 477 477 5,000 0 (5,000)Total Materials Expenditures 5,253 11 5,263 16,300 0 (16,300)Total Utilties Expenditures 3,027 0 3,027 6,300 0 (6,300)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 176 0 176 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 6,351 0 (6,351)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 1,295 1,461 2,756 650 0 (650)Total Expenditures 96,041$ 3,949$ 99,989$ 202,155$ 0$ (202,155)$


(96,041)$ (3,949)$ (99,989)$ (202,155)$ 0$ 202,155$

Fire Department

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 4,186 0 (4,186)Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 3,800 0 (3,800)Total Travel & Expenditures 25 0 25 2,700 0 (2,700)Total Materials Expenditures 5,012 0 5,012 6,400 0 (6,400)Total Utilties Expenditures 2,310 0 2,310 5,980 0 (5,980)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 3,000 0 (3,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 4,827 0 (4,827)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 8,700 0 (8,700)


ActualY-T-D


RevisedBudget

BudgetChange

Total Expenditures 7,347$ 0$ 7,347$ 39,593$ 0$ (39,593)$


(7,347)$ 0$ (7,347)$ (39,593)$ 0$ 39,593$

LibraryTotal Revenues 7,000$ 0$ 7,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$

Total Personnel Expenditures 31,491 0 31,491 64,907 0 (64,907)Total Benefits Expeditures 14,290 0 14,290 39,007 0 (39,007)Total Contract Expenditures 0 380 380 2,800 0 (2,800)Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 14,845 5,297 20,140 9,270 0 (9,270)Total Utilties Expenditures 2,663 0 2,663 11,227 0 (11,227)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 1,400 0 (1,400)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 1,750 0 (1,750)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 63,289$ 5,677$ 68,964$ 130,361$ 0$ (130,361)$


(56,289)$ (5,677)$ (61,964)$ (130,361)$ 0$ 130,361$

Recreation

Total Personnel Expenditures 22,822 0 22,822 53,362 0 (53,362)Total Benefits Expeditures 10,965 0 10,965 25,771 0 (25,771)Total Contract Expenditures 2,202 0 2,202 3,600 0 (3,600)Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 2,407 0 2,407 2,000 0 (2,000)Total Utilties Expenditures 5,469 0 5,469 17,140 0 (17,140)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 4,630 0 (4,630)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 108 0 108 3,500 0 (3,500)Total Expenditures 43,973$ 0$ 43,973$ 110,003$ 0$ (110,003)$


(43,973)$ 0$ (43,973)$ (110,003)$ 0$ 110,003$

Aquatic Center

Total Personnel Expenditures 74,911 0 74,911 156,536 0 (156,536)Total Benefits Expeditures 38,867 0 38,867 128,834 0 (128,834)Total Contract Expenditures 783 0 783 4,700 0 (4,700)Total Travel & Expenditures 339 0 339 8,820 0 (8,820)Total Materials Expenditures 9,185 (3,986) 5,199 20,200 0 (20,200)Total Utilties Expenditures 44,228 0 44,228 131,920 0 (131,920)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 570 0 570 4,800 0 (4,800)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 10,800 0 (10,800)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 101,590 335 101,925 140,684 0 (140,684)Total Expenditures 270,473$ (3,651)$ 266,822$ 607,294$ 0$ (607,294)$


(270,473)$ 3,651$ (266,822)$ (607,294)$ 0$ 607,294$

SewerTotal Revenues 155,832$ 0$ 155,832$ 295,154$ 0$ (295,154)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 43,936 0 43,936 75,938 0 (75,938)Total Benefits Expeditures 22,221 0 22,221 52,563 0 (52,563)Total Contract Expenditures 2,490 0 2,490 7,800 0 (7,800)Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 1,280 0 (1,280)Total Materials Expenditures 5,428 2,832 8,260 8,350 0 (8,350)Total Utilties Expenditures 11,768 0 11,768 71,963 0 (71,963)


ActualY-T-D


RevisedBudget

BudgetChange

Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 4,000 0 (4,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 5,450 0 (5,450)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 58,947 0 58,947 64,996 0 (64,996)Total Expenditures 144,790$ 2,832$ 147,622$ 292,340$ 0$ (292,340)$


11,042$ (2,832)$ 8,210$ 2,814$ 0$ (2,814)$

WaterTotal Revenues 167,833$ 0$ 167,833$ 323,860$ 0$ (323,860)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 73,577 0 73,577 131,908 0 (131,908)Total Benefits Expeditures 34,138 0 34,138 81,029 0 (81,029)Total Contract Expenditures 3,299 13,031 16,330 85,000 0 (85,000)Total Travel & Expenditures 4,426 (1,864) 2,562 3,935 0 (3,935)Total Materials Expenditures 52,693 2,857 55,552 57,475 0 (57,475)Total Utilties Expenditures 15,257 0 15,257 57,400 0 (57,400)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 10,000 0 (10,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 8,850 0 (8,850)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 27,479 (3,491) 23,988 119,506 0 (119,506)Total Expenditures 210,869$ 10,533$ 221,404$ 555,103$ 0$ (555,103)$


(43,036)$ (10,533)$ (53,571)$ (231,243)$ 0$ 231,243$

GarbageTotal Revenues 163,461$ 0$ 163,461$ 354,283$ 0$ (354,283)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 21,767 0 21,767 37,896 0 (37,896)Total Benefits Expeditures 14,617 0 14,617 38,442 0 (38,442)Total Contract Expenditures 99,228 0 99,228 207,500 0 (207,500)Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 1,231 0 1,231 9,300 0 (9,300)Total Utilties Expenditures 101 0 101 500 0 (500)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 5,000 0 (5,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 3,500 0 (3,500)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 25,000 0 (25,000)Total Expenditures 136,944$ 0$ 136,944$ 327,138$ 0$ (327,138)$


26,517$ 0$ 26,517$ 27,145$ 0$ (27,145)$

HarborTotal Revenues 203,926$ 0$ 203,926$ 269,500$ 0$ (269,500)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 75,783 0 75,783 129,538 0 (129,538)Total Benefits Expeditures 33,451 0 33,451 75,695 0 (75,695)Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 2,850 0 (2,850)Total Travel & Expenditures 2,716 250 2,966 4,350 0 (4,350)Total Materials Expenditures 8,557 (733) 7,825 18,445 0 (18,445)Total Utilties Expenditures 12,859 0 12,859 62,868 0 (62,868)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 3,202 1,000 4,202 14,400 0 (14,400)Total Other Expenditures 10,985 0 10,985 24,500 0 (24,500)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 133,006 (3,286) 129,720 80,000 0 (80,000)Total Expenditures 280,559$ (2,769)$ 277,791$ 412,646$ 0$ (412,646)$


(76,633)$ 2,769$ (73,865)$ (143,146)$ 0$ 143,146$

Other Fund Sources 0 0 0 (80,000) 0 80,000Other Funding Sources/Outflows 0 0 0 (80,000) 0 80,000


ActualY-T-D


RevisedBudget

BudgetChange

JTB Industrail Park

Total Revenues 518,890$ 0$ 518,890$ 416,589$ 0$ (416,589)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 55,781 0 55,781 88,625 0 (88,625)Total Benefits Expeditures 12,624 0 12,624 38,873 0 (38,873)Total Contract Expenditures 2,163 0 2,163 15,500 0 (15,500)Total Travel & Expenditures (335) 335 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 9,306 (855) 8,451 17,800 0 (17,800)Total Utilties Expenditures 27,362 0 27,362 52,782 0 (52,782)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 8,215 2,549 10,764 4,000 0 (4,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 12,325 0 (12,325)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 115,116$ 2,029$ 117,145$ 229,905$ 0$ (229,905)$


403,774$ (2,029)$ 401,745$ 186,684$ 0$ (186,684)$

Ward Cove CanneryTotal Revenues 2,860$ 0$ 2,860$ 7,000$ 0$ (7,000)$

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 5 0 5 880 0 (880)Total Utilties Expenditures 600 0 600 3,100 0 (3,100)Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 1,000 0 (1,000)Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 1,020 0 (1,020)Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 1,236 0 1,236 1,000 0 (1,000)Total Expenditures 1,841$ 0$ 1,841$ 7,000$ 0$ (7,000)$


1,019$ 0$ 1,019$ 0$ 0$ 0$

PSN Hatchery

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Contract Expenditures 28,000 0 28,000 0 0 0Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 28,000$ 0$ 28,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$


(28,000)$ 0$ (28,000)$ 0$ 0$ 0$

GF RevenueTotal Revenues 2,716,414$ 0$ 2,716,414$ (3,622,981)$ 0$ 3,622,981$

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0


ActualY-T-D


RevisedBudget

BudgetChange

Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$


2,716,414$ 0$ 2,716,414$ (3,622,981)$ 0$ 3,622,981$

Inter Governmental Transfers

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Expenditures 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$


0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$

Other Fund Sources 429 0 429 0 0 0Other Funding Sources/Outflows 429 0 429 0 0 0

Equipment

Total Personnel Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Benefits Expeditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Contract Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Travel & Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Materials Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Utilties Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Repairs & Maint Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Other Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Capital & Debt Expenditures 5 0 5 0 0 0Total Expenditures 5$ 0$ 5$ 0$ 0$ 0$


(5)$ 0$ (5)$ 0$ 0$ 0$

City of Craig

Memorandum

To: Mayor Tim O’Connor, and Craig City Council From: Jessica Holloway, Aquatic Manager RE: December Report Date: December 12, 2019

Currently the Aquatic Center staff is working on getting the “Train with Us “program up and running. It is taking a little longer than we had hoped but we are hoping to conduct our first “Train with Us” night by the end of January. The Jr. Lifeguarding program will happen over spring break this year. I do not have exact times or dates as of yet but we are shooting for that week. Aqua aerobics is still a plan. Unfortunately the original plan to contract out the class was a bust. I am going to teach the class but that is going to have to wait until I have another employee to be able to guard in the mornings for me. I am currently the opening staff at the pool because the other two adults are needed in the evening. As soon as we are able to hire another full time person I will move to a more normal day shift and start those classes.

The Aquatic Center has Hired Marianna Ensign and Ethan Dill as part time lifeguards. Ethan is almost done with his requirements for his certification and will be put on the schedule on the 20th to start training. Marianna has already completed and received her certificate from the high school class I taught last year. The Aquatic Center is currently seeking a full time Lifeguard II. The position recently came open and will stay open until filled.

December and January are busy months for the swim team. The Wave Runners will travel to Ketchikan this weekend to compete in the “Decathlon Meet” they are taking 25 swimmers with them. The weekend of the 21st, the Wave Runners will hold the “Sate Virtual Championship” for the 10 and under group. This is a real meet not just a time trial. Their times will be up against other 10 and under from all over the state. January the Wave Runners and the Craig Aquatic center will host the annual “Winter Games “meet. That will be from January 18th and 19th. We will start to cool the pool on the 15th. The pool will be closed to public use during the meet. Friends and family and all members of the community are encouraged to come and cheer on their favorite wave runner.

The pool will be closed on January 4th for a SCUBA rental and in-service training. I had a class planned for and LGI course for the weekend of December 5th, unfortunately due to the amount of travel and costs of travel for participants the class did not happen. I am going to hold a class over the 3rd 4th and 5th of January but it will be for in house only. Both Chris and Duncan want to obtain their LGI and this will be the only available weekend.

Chris is out of town until the 30th. Duncan Brown is back for Christmas Break and filling in for him at the pool. We will have an extra open swim over the winter break from 1-230 Monday through Thursday and 1-2 on Fridays , along with our nightly open swim.

Please feel free to call or email with any questions or concerns.

Happy Holidays from the Aquatic Center Staff

City of Craig Memorandum

Date: January 16, 2020 To: Mayor O’Connor and Craig City Council From: Jillian Carl, City Clerk Re: Clerk’s Report Trip I will be out of the office for personal leave during January 15th- 24th, Allison Fargo will be covering for me at the council meeting on the 16th. If you have any questions on the VFH application, Allison and Jon should be able to answer all of them. If not, feel free to call or email me. Next Meeting The next scheduled council meeting is February 6, 2020. If anyone will be out of town please inform Jon.

CITY OF CRAIG

MEMORANDUM To: Craig Mayor and City Council

From: Brian Templin, City Planner


RE: Planning Department Staff Report – January 2020

1. Craig Harbor Development. The planning commission and harbor committee

recommendations for development of the harbor and cannery site property is

included as an action item on the agenda for the January 16th

meeting.

The USACE has completed some of the survey work related to the breakwater

design. Staff from eTrac, a company specializing in hydrographic surveys has

made two recent trips to Craig to set monuments, do underwater mapping

(bathymetric), and some geotechnical work. The city has provided some support

for the contract, primarily launch, moorage, and storage of eTrac’s survey vessel.

We will submit these in-kind services to the USACE. These services will be

credited to our portion of the project cost and matched by the USACE. For every

$1,000 of in-kind work that the city provides, the USACE is authorized to spend

$9,000 in federal dollars on the project.

We will be meeting with USACE staff here in Craig on February 20th

. The

primary purpose of the visit will be to complete consultation between the USACE

archeologist and the State Historic Preservation Officer. This is a requirement for

federally funded projects. I will ask the USACE project manager to prepare a

short presentation and to be available to answer questions at the February 20th

city

council meeting.

We are still waiting for the results of the CDBG grant application that was

authorized by the council in September. Awards for this grant will be announced

in February 2020.

2. School Emergency Power Project. The city received funding from the State

Homeland Security Program grant to make electrical improvements and install

transfer switches at the Craig Elementary, Middle, and High School. The purpose

of the project is to make it easy to plug in a generator to the building to power a

portion of the building for emergency purposes. The area that will be powered is

based around areas needed to support emergency shelters and the size of the

generator that the city owns through a previous SHSP grant (56 kW).

We have selected Sitka Electric (based on low bid) construction work for the

Craig Elementary and Middle Schools and we are working on the design and bid

specifications for the High School. We had four bids for the elementary/middle

school project that ranged from $54,335 to $87,530. Sitka Electric was the low

bidder on the project and is capable of completing the work. I am currently

finishing the contract for services and will get that signed by mid January so they

can order materials and start the work. Our goal is to have all work completed by

February 29th

. Design for the high school should be done in January and

construction done by August 2020.

3. 2020 Capital Project Requests. One of the items on the agenda for the January

16th

meeting is the annual Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Resolution. This

resolution sets out general priorities for staff over the coming year. As part of the

CIP process we submit annual requests to the state legislature and to the federal

delegation for funding. In recent years there have not been funds distributed to

most communities at the state level and the federal delegation is still operating

under restrictions that do not allow them to fund individual projects. Despite the

state funding picture the past few years we have continued to submit projects

important to us to keep them on the legislature’s radar. We submit these projects

through the legislative system called CAPSIS. Last year’s CAPSIS requests

included:

Craig Harbor Preconstruction Engineering and Design ($315,000)

Craig Harbor Construction ($12,500,000)

Repair and Upgrades for POWER Building ($150,000)

New Garbage Truck ($360,000)

Public Works Heavy Equipment Storage Building ($400,000)

The highest priority projects at the moment are the design and construction

funding for the new harbor and related upland development. The first project on

the list is a request for design funding for the harbor. This is the same amount,

and intent as the CDBG grant that was submitted in November. If we are

approved for the CDBG grant this item will not be needed. If we are not

approved for the CDBG grant this is a potential source of funding for the harbor

design fees.

The Harbor Construction project request would privide the funding for our match

to the USACE breakwater construction funding (±$4,000,000), harbor

construction funding (±$6,000,000), and funding to construct access/utilities on

the uplands to support the harbor (±$2,500,000). Getting all of the funding at

once would be ideal, but we can work with the legislature for some portion of the

overall funding if there are funds available.

The other three projects we included on the list last year are high priority projects,

but there is no imminent need like there is for harbor related funding.

The Anchorage Assembly recently announced their support/desire for the state to

issue a General Obligation Bond for marine related infrastructure projects around

the state. This may or may not happen, but if it does, it would be a very

appropriate source of funding for either of the first two projects on our list.

It is my intent to submit the first two projects for consideration by the state

legislature in the upcoming legislative session for funding. This puts us in the

right position if some sort of bond or other capital funding is approved for

communities during the 2020 legislative session.

The CAPSIS submittals are not due until February 14th

so we may know the

results of the CDBG funding before that date. If we are approved for CDBG

funding before the CAPSIS deadline we may remove that item from the submittal

and concentrate on the larger construction funding item.

4. Taquan Air Lease/Waterfall Resort Access Permit for Floatplane Terminal Space.

As the council is aware, Pacific Airways recently vacated their portion of the

floatplane terminal here in Craig. After some discussion with the council the city

issued an access permit to Waterfall Resort for seasonal use of the space.

Recently Taquan Air (the other tenant in the building) requested that we amend

their lease and allow them to occupy the smaller space previously occupied by

Pac Air. Waterfall Resort has agreed to occupy the larger space under the access

permit we have negotiated. Taquan Air will be paying the same square foot cost,

but since the space is smaller the overall monthly lease fee will be less. Taquan’s

monthly lease (total cost) will drop from $1,080 per month to $800 per month.

5. Prince of Wales Chamber of Commerce Banquet. The POW Chamber of

Commerce is holding a member banquet on January 18th

from 6 pm – 9 pm at the

Craig Tribal Hall. The City of Craig is a member of the chamber and so the city

council, staff, and volunteers are eligible to attend the banquet. The menu

includes crab or flank steak, live music, and a great evening. Tickets are $45 each

or a table of 6 for $240. If anyone is interested in attending, call the Chamber

office at 755-2626 to get tickets.

6. Tract P Access Road. The Craig Tribal Association began construction of a new

access road on Tract P from Cold Storage Road, running behind the tribal hall to

Easy Street. CTA has started work at Cold Storage Road and will continue to

work on the road throughout the current construction season. Planning and Public

Works staff will continue to work with CTA throughout the construction project.

7. Sidewalk Development. CTA has completed most of the construction work on

the sidewalk project along School Road (middle/elementary school) and along

Port Bagial Blvd. Staff will continue to work with CTA on this project.

8. Travel and Leave Schedule: I will be on personal leave from February 28th

–

March 10th

.

Craig FIRE & EMS

PO Box 331

Craig, AK 99921

CITY COUNCIL REPORT JANUARY 2020

TRAINING AND EVENTS

FIRE: ▪ We assisted Klawock with a house fire in December. It was a total loss.

▪ EMS:

▪ We have been very busy this Holiday season, we even had several calls on Christmas. ▪ I have put together my tentative plan for a retention program. I am eager for it to be approved by the council. ▪ I am diligently working on the 2020 Medical Symposium for Craig. It is going to be an amazing event. Peace

health and SEARHC are both excited about the event. ▪ We are back to training weekly on Monday nights.

Here is a picture of the challenge coin for symposium. These will be auctioned off at the banquet

If you have any questions please email or call me anytime.

Chaundell Piburn

Craig Fire & EMS Administrator

Craig Public Library 2019

Submitted by Angela Matthews, Library Director

12/1/2019 – 12/31/2019 Volunteer Hours: 20 Patron Visits: 1136 Circulation: 2486 Computer Usage: 254 Tests Proctored: 6 Meetings: 7 Alaska Digital Library Usage: 71 Story Times: 6 Attendance: 62 Inter-Library Loans: 44 Library Programs:

• Every Friday, 10:00 am: Preschool Story Time • Every Friday, 11:00 am: Head Start Story Time • Dolly Parton Imagination Library—Continuous Registrations • November 23rd- January 4th: Winter Reading Program • December 2nd-13th: After School Christmas Crafts • December 14th: DIY Ornaments • December 20th: Christmas Cookie Decorating • December 23rd: Christmas Movies at the Library • December 31st: Noon Year’s Eve Party

Winter Reading Program The Winter Reading Program ended on January 4th with a total of 83 participants! Between the simpler format and more frequent events, I feel like everyone involved had a lot more fun with it. Some of our top readers broke records for amount of hours read; the winner in our adult age group turned in 21 reading logs (63 hours of reading in 6 weeks!) while the grade school aged winners read close to 40 hours each. There were days when the children’s area was full to bursting with kids and adults working on Christmas crafts, and we had a turnout of 26 people for our Noon Year’s Eve party and balloon drop. I will be attending a workshop in Anchorage in March for this year’s Summer Reading Program, so I expect to have even more success with our next reading program!


Date: January 9th, 2020 To: Honorable Tim O’Connor, Craig City Council Fr: RJ Ely, Police Chief Re: Staff Report / December 2019 ACTIVITY Activity from November 26, 2019 through December 31, 2019 Dispatch Center took the following amount of calls for service. Totals for Year Craig 921 10,293 Klawock 454 3,665 AST 11 88 Cases / Incidents for 2019 433 Bookings Craig 226 / AST / 151 Klawock / 108 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Both DMV Agents completed several ongoing updated web trainings, pertaining to Real ID’s, new software and computer testing systems. DISPATCHER(S) Margaret “Maggie” Gore has completed training, working solo shifts. Due to recent development, she will not be able to work full time, but will continue working part time / fill in. OFFICER(S) Ofc. Bryan Bixler has given his notice, resigned and his last day with CPD will be January 20, 2020. He will be moving out of state. He has worked for Craig Police Department since October 2015. Started as a dispatcher and then as an officer. OTHER USFS has contacted me, have a vehicle that will be coming up in next few weeks, for purchase. If all works, will acquire and this new/used vehicle will replace the old Dodge Dakota Truck. Vehicle is currently in Ketchikan, very low miles and is in great condition. Traffic Stops for 2019 291

47 ended in Arrest 58 Citations Issued

Craig Recreation, director Victoria Merritt 826-2575 [email protected]

January 2020 City Council Report from Craig Recreation Report

I will not be able to attend this meeting, my apologies. I have hired Pilar Mas as my new assistant and she is working out very well. We hosted a sober New Years party and had 20 people stop by. We plan on opening up for young adults January 24th and see how it goes. She will be helping with Ballet and the volleyball leagues that are just starting up as well as after school and Friday rollerskating. She loves to clean and organize! The Youth and Recreation Center looks great!

Ballet Classes will start on January 25th! Sign up will be at City Hall where the instructor happens to work. We will charge $5 each class. A recital will be held on March14, 2020. To start we will offer 4 age groups. 9am ages 3+4. 9:30 ages 5 +6, 10:15 ages 7-9 and 11am ages 10-12. Allison Fargo Instructor.

! !

After school is a blast! Monday we have Games, Legos and crafts with Pilar Mas. Tuesday we head to the City Gym at 4pm to roller skate or blade Wednesday is Open gym at


Craig Recreation, director Victoria Merritt 826-2575 [email protected]

4pm. Thursdays head to the City Gym for dodgeball at 4pm. Thanks to Craig PD and Sargent Medina for joining us and the other fun adults who come and play. Fridays we watch a movie! A snack is always included and this is a screen free program except for the movie. We do ask for a $2 donation. 4 on 4 Coed Volleyball League, we are still recruiting teams. Will start in January. Team fee is $100. Sigh ups will be at City Hall or Open Gym on Tuesday and Thursdays at 7pm. We have at least 4 teams but I am hoping for more. Games will start next week when I am back. Regular activities continue.Skating is back on Friday nights at 7pm. Admission is now $2 and skate or blade rental is $2. I have a new air freshener and the room actually smells pretty good! Karate is held Tuesday, Thursday and Friday at 5pm. For youth and adults. They are planning a trip to Okinawa. Magic and other games every Saturday at 4pm $1 to play High School and up at the Rec/Youth Center. Rec Center will soon open Fridays for sober evening fun starting on January 24! Hip Hop Class is on the horizon! Winston Johnson will be our instructor. He will be building on his Break dancing class and hoping to attract more students. We will be trying a Sunday Swap Meet in the near future. Elementary Basketball will be happening this spring. Never a dull moment!

Submitted by Victoria Merritt, Recreation Director.


Parks & Public Facilities 1/9/2020

Staff Report – January 2020 To: Craig Mayor and City Council From: Douglas Ward Current Projects Underway:

1. Propane Boilers at Aquatic Center. (Waiting on report from manufacturer)

2. Medical Center outdoor LED lighting upgrade. .

3. Roll up door repair at fire hall.

4. Snow removal at city facilities.

5. EMS oxygen machine repair.

6. North Cove cameras re-install.

Completed Items: 1. Roll up door installation at fire hall. 2. Medical Center HVAC controller upgrade. 3. Sewer unplug at Police department. 4. Door repair at WTP. 5. Radiator cooling fan replacement on Gator. 6. Dog pound door repair. 7. Assist Harbors W/ concrete pour. Fill 3 bumpers with extra. 8. AHU-2 paint rust at pool. 9. Seal holes in wall in new mechanical room at pool. 10. Replace emergency lights at city hall. 11. Day to day service calls

As always, don’t hesitate to call or contact me anytime for questions or concerns. (907)401-1038

RECEIVED

DEC 2 7 20\9

De r City of Craig,

On behalf of the Craig

Chi d Care Center, board

me bers, staff and

chil ren, I would like to

rous donation!

the support from you,

ill be able to continue

to rovide safe, reliable

and quality licensed care

ur families in the Made with Posterf\lyWall com

co munity. We can also continue to provide jobs and supplies to care for the

chil ren; such as art, toys, books and other needs the center may have. All

s go to the operation and cost of maintaining the facility.

Tha k you again for your kindness, generosity and time that you put into

Katelyn Cook, Administrator

Clients are encouraged to compare this report w

ith the official statement from

their custodian.

INVESTM

ENT PERFO

RMAN

CE

CurrentM

onthCurrentQ

uarterYear toD

ateLatest 1

YearInception to

Date

Portfolio1.51

3.1018.45

12.415.83

Benchmark

1.543.14

18.9912.87

5.53

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

20.00

Percent Total Return (Gross)

Perform

ance is Annualized for P

eriods Greater than O

ne Year

Cu

rrent A

ccoun

t Ben

chm

ark:Eq

uity B

lend

PORTFO

LIO CO

MPO

SITION

Fixed Income

33%

US Lg C

ap41%

US M

d Cap

6% Int'l10%

Real Estate

10%

MAN

AGEMEN

T TEAM

Client Relationship Manager:

Amber Frizzell, AIF®

Amber@

apcm.net

Your Portfolio Manager:

Bill Lierman, CFA®

Contact Phone Num

ber:907/272 -7575

ACCOU

NT ACTIVITY

Portfolio Value on 10-31-1911,010,990

Contributions 0

Withdraw

als -2,753

Change in Market Value

160,042Interest

6,549Dividends

0


CITY OF CRAIG

Account Statement - Period Ending N

ovember 30, 2019

Alaska Permanent Capital Management Co.

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND TARGETCITY OF CRAIGNovember 30, 2019

%Asset Class & Target Market Value Assets Range

FIXED INCOME (34%)US Fixed Income (34.0%) 3,596,608 32.2 20% to 45%

Cash (0.0%) 127,568 1.1 na

Subtotal: 3,724,176 33.3

EQUITY (56%)US Large Cap (40.0%) 4,555,923 40.8 30% to 50%

US Mid Cap (6.0%) 685,751 6.1 0% to 10%

Developed International Equity (10.0%) 1,112,496 10.0 5% to 15%

Subtotal: 6,354,171 56.9

ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS (10%)Real Estate (10.0%) 1,096,480 9.8 5% to 15%

Subtotal: 1,096,480 9.8

TOTAL PORTFOLIO 11,174,827 100

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

PO

RT

FO

LIO

AP

PR

AIS

AL

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IGN

ovember 30, 2019

Yield

Average

Total

Mark

etP

ct.A

nn

ual

Accru

edto

Quantity

Security

Cost

Average C

ostP

riceV

alue

Assets

Income

InterestM

aturity

FN

MA

& F

HL

MC

3,415F

HL

MC

PO

OL

G14203

104.563,570

104.363,563

0.03137

111.84

4.000% D

ue 04-01-26A

ccrued Interest11

0.00

3,5703,575

0.0311

CO

RP

OR

AT

E B

ON

DS

50,000N

BC

UN

IVE

RS

AL

ME

DIA

LL

C109.20

54,602103.12

51,5610.46

2,187365

1.994.375%

Due 04-01-21

50,000A

ME

RIC

AN

EX

PR

ES

S C

RE

DIT

99.9249,962

100.4750,236

0.451,125

811.91

2.250% D

ue 05-05-2150,000

GIL

EA

D S

CIE

NC

ES

INC

96.2848,141

99.9749,987

0.45975

2441.96

1.950% D

ue 03-01-2250,000

UN

ITE

DH

EA

LT

H G

RO

UP

INC

102.5651,279

101.8550,927

0.461,437

3032.04

2.875% D

ue 03-15-2250,000

CO

MC

AS

T C

OR

P101.83

50,917102.57

51,2860.46

1,425538

2.002.850%

Due 01-15-23

50,000A

FL

AC

INC

106.0353,016

105.3452,669

0.471,812

8362.05

3.625% D

ue 06-15-2350,000

BA

NK

OF N

EW

YO

RK

ME

LL

ON

97.8348,916

100.5250,261

0.451,100

3212.05

2.200% D

ue 08-16-2350,000

JPM

OR

GA

N C

HA

SE

& C

O105.18

52,590106.46

53,2310.48

1,937646

2.243.875%

Due 02-01-24

50,000M

ET

LIFE

INC

105.4652,732

106.0353,015

0.471,800

2552.14

3.600% D

ue 04-10-2450,000

WE

LL

S FAR

GO

& C

OM

PAN

Y99.88

49,941104.32

52,1580.47

1,650376

2.343.300%

Due 09-09-24

50,000A

PP

LIE

D M

AT

ER

IAL

S IN

C107.96

53,978108.92

54,4610.49

1,950325

2.263.900%

Due 10-01-25

50,000T

AR

GE

T C

OR

P96.45

48,223102.61

51,3030.46

1,250160

2.062.500%

Due 04-15-26

Accrued Interest

4,4490.04

614,300625,547

5.604,449

DO

ME

ST

IC L

AR

GE

CA

P E

QU

ITY

FU

ND

S/E

TF

14,495S

PD

R S

&P

500 ET

F153.23

2,221,093314.31

4,555,92340.77

NA

DO

ME

ST

IC M

ID C

AP

EQ

UIT

Y F

UN

DS

/ET

F3,410

ISH

AR

ES

CO

RE

S&

P M

IDC

AP

400 ET

F112.16

382,478201.10

685,7516.14

NA

INT

ER

NA

TIO

NA

L E

QU

ITY

FU

ND

S/E

TF

8,725IS

HA

RE

S E

TF

CO

RE

MS

CI E

AF

E56.94

496,79563.82

556,8294.98

NA

8,150IS

HA

RE

S M

SC

I EA

FE

IND

EX

FU

ND

61.71502,904

68.18555,667

4.97N

A

999,6991,112,496

9.96

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

PO

RT

FO

LIO

AP

PR

AIS

AL

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IGN

ovember 30, 2019

Yield

Average

Total

Mark

etP

ct.A

nn

ual

Accru

edto

Quantity

Security

Cost

Average C

ostP

riceV

alue

Assets

Income

InterestM

aturity

RE

AL

ES

TA

TE

& IN

FR

AS

TR

UC

TU

RE

12,175JP

MO

RG

AN

BE

TA

BU

ILD

ER

S M

SC

I US

RE

IT E

TF

77.43942,733

90.061,096,480

9.81N

A

U.S

. TR

EA

SU

RY

75,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S99.91

74,933100.05

75,0410.67

1,312112

1.691.750%

Due 10-31-20

150,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.45149,169

100.78151,165

1.353,187

9351.66

2.125% D

ue 08-15-2150,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S100.69

50,343100.58

50,2910.45

1,000253

1.662.000%

Due 08-31-21

75,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.9274,943

100.6775,504

0.681,500

1281.64

2.000% D

ue 10-31-21100,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S99.76

99,762100.69

100,6870.90

2,00088

1.642.000%

Due 11-15-21

100,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

100.10100,101

100.52100,516

0.901,875

6271.63

1.875% D

ue 01-31-22200,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S98.10

196,209101.32

202,6481.81

4,2501,779

1.602.125%

Due 06-30-22

100,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.8999,894

100.36100,356

0.901,750

6611.61

1.750% D

ue 07-15-22150,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S97.79

146,686100.06

150,0941.34

2,437107

1.601.625%

Due 11-15-22

150,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.73149,593

103.18154,776

1.393,937

9951.62

2.625% D

ue 02-28-23125,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S98.87

123,590103.16

128,9501.15

3,125917

1.622.500%

Due 08-15-23

170,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.92169,867

99.16168,565

1.512,337

6031.61

1.375% D

ue 08-31-23115,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S98.81

113,630102.05

117,3631.05

2,444416

1.632.125%

Due 03-31-24

100,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

100.23100,227

103.33103,328

0.922,375

6971.64

2.375% D

ue 08-15-24200,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S102.02

204,038102.30

204,6021.83

4,25012

1.642.125%

Due 11-30-24

75,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

100.6375,469

101.7076,274

0.681,500

4401.66

2.000% D

ue 02-15-25175,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S98.46

172,301101.71

177,9941.59

3,5001,027

1.682.000%

Due 08-15-25

55,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

101.3155,718

105.3157,920

0.521,444

6041.70

2.625% D

ue 12-31-25100,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S100.40

100,397104.67

104,6680.94

2,500632

1.712.500%

Due 02-28-26

100,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

101.05101,055

99.4699,465

0.891,625

711.71

1.625% D

ue 05-15-26150,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S97.14

145,717101.80

152,7071.37

3,000132

1.722.000%

Due 11-15-26

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

PO

RT

FO

LIO

AP

PR

AIS

AL

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IGN

ovember 30, 2019

Yield

Average

Total

Mark

etP

ct.A

nn

ual

Accru

edto

Quantity

Security

Cost

Average C

ostP

riceV

alue

Assets

Income

InterestM

aturity

125,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

95.20118,996

103.76129,697

1.162,812

1241.74

2.250% D

ue 11-15-2780,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S102.02

81,613111.19

88,9530.80

2,500110

1.773.125%

Due 11-15-28

125,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.82124,774

107.19133,989

1.203,281

9631.77

2.625% D

ue 02-15-2950,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S99.35

49,67398.52

49,2580.44

812238

1.791.625%

Due 08-15-29

Accrued Interest

12,6710.11

2,878,6982,967,486

26.5612,671

CA

SH

AN

D E

QU

IVA

LE

NT

SC

AS

H R

EC

EIV

AB

LE

2,1252,125

0.02N

AC

HA

RL

ES

SC

HW

AB

LIQ

UID

BA

NK

DE

PO

SIT

A

CC

OU

NT

125,443125,443

1.12

127,568127,568

1.14T

OT

AL

PO

RT

FO

LIO

8,170,13911,174,827

10079,543

17,132


TRANSACTION SUMMARY CITY OF CRAIG

From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19

Trade Settle TradeDate Date Security Quantity Amount

PURCHASESU.S. TREASURY

11-13-19 11-14-19 US TREASURY NOTES 200,000 204,038.402.125% Due 11-30-24

204,038.40

DEPOSITS AND EXPENSESMANAGEMENT FEES

11-30-19 11-30-19 MANAGEMENT FEES 2,793.712,793.71

InterestAGENCIES

11-14-19 11-14-19 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK - STEP UP

1,000.00

2.000% Due 11-14-22

CASH AND EQUIVALENTS11-15-19 11-15-19 CHARLES SCHWAB

LIQUID BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT

3.99

CORPORATE BONDS11-05-19 11-05-19 AMERICAN EXPRESS

CREDIT562.50

2.250% Due 05-05-2111-13-19 11-13-19 HSBC USA INC 1,187.50

2.375% Due 11-13-19

1,750.00

FNMA & FHLMC11-15-19 11-15-19 FHLMC POOL G14203 11.71

4.000% Due 04-01-26



From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19


U.S. TREASURY 11-15-19 11-15-19 US TREASURY NOTES 1,406.25

2.250% Due 11-15-2711-15-19 11-15-19 US TREASURY NOTES 1,250.00

3.125% Due 11-15-2811-15-19 11-15-19 US TREASURY NOTES 812.50





2.125% Due 11-30-24

9,312.5012,078.20

PRINCIPAL PAYDOWNSFNMA & FHLMC

11-15-19 11-15-19 FHLMC POOL G14203 97.93 97.934.000% Due 04-01-26

97.93

Purchased Accrued InterestU.S. TREASURY

11-13-19 11-14-19 US TREASURY NOTES 1,939.212.125% Due 11-30-24

1,939.21

SALES, MATURITIES, AND CALLSAGENCIES

11-14-19 11-14-19 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK - STEP UP

100,000 100,000.00

2.000% Due 11-14-22



From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19


CORPORATE BONDS11-13-19 11-13-19 HSBC USA INC 100,000 100,000.00

2.375% Due 11-13-19

DOMESTIC LARGE CAP EQUITY FUNDS/ETF11-01-19 11-05-19 SPDR S&P 500 ETF 125.0000 38,192.11

INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUNDS/ETF11-01-19 11-05-19 ISHARES ETF CORE MSCI

EAFE300.0000 19,132.10

11-01-19 11-05-19 ISHARES MSCI EAFE INDEX FUND

275.0000 18,677.67

37,809.77276,001.88

WithdrawCASH AND EQUIVALENTS

11-22-19 11-22-19 CHARLES SCHWAB LIQUID BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT

2,752.75

2,752.75

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

RE

AL

IZE

D G

AIN

S A

ND

LO

SS

ES

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IGFrom

11-01-19 Through 11-30-19

Avg. C

ostD

ateQ

uan

tityS

ecurity

Basis

Proceed

sG

ain O

r Loss

11-01-19300.0000

ISH

AR

ES E

TF

CO

RE

MS

CI

EA

FE

17,081.7619,132.10

2,050.34

11-01-19275.0000

ISH

AR

ES M

SC

I EA

FE

IN

DE

X F

UN

D16,969.15

18,677.671,708.52

11-01-19125.0000

SP

DR

S&

P 500 E

TF

19,153.9638,192.11

19,038.1511-13-19

100,000H

SB

C U

SA IN

C99,608.00

100,000.00392.00

2.375% D

ue 11-13-1911-14-19

100,000F

ED

ER

AL

HO

ME

LO

AN

B

AN

K - S

TE

P U

P99,865.00

100,000.00135.00

2.000% D

ue 11-14-2211-15-19

97.93F

HL

MC

PO

OL

G14203

102.4097.93

-4.474.000%

Due 04-01-26

TO

TA

L G

AIN

S 23,324.00

TO

TA

L L

OSS

ES

-4.47

252,780.27276,099.81

23,319.54

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

CA

SH

LE

DG

ER

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IGFrom

11-01-19 To 11-30-19

Trade

Settle

Tran

Date

Date

Cod

eA

ctivityS

ecurity

Am

oun

t

CA

SH

RE

CE

IVA

BL

E11-01-19

Beginning B

alance0.00

11-30-1912-02-19

dpInterest

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S2,125.00

2.125% D

ue 11-30-2411-30-19

En

ding B

alance

2,125.00

CH

AR

LE

S S

CH

WA

B L

IQU

ID B

AN

K D

EP

OS

IT A

CC

OU

NT

11-01-19B

eginning Balance

48,120.5111-01-19

11-05-19dp

Sale

ISH

AR

ES E

TF C

OR

E M

SCI E

AFE

19,132.1011-01-19

11-05-19dp

Sale

ISH

AR

ES M

SC

I EA

FE

IND

EX

F

UN

D18,677.67

11-01-1911-05-19

dpS

ale S

PDR

S&

P 500 ET

F38,192.11

11-05-1911-05-19

dpInterest

AM

ER

ICA

N E

XP

RE

SS

CR

ED

IT562.50

2.250% D

ue 05-05-2111-13-19

11-13-19dp

Sale

HS

BC

USA

INC

100,000.002.375%

Due 11-13-19

11-13-1911-13-19

dpInterest

HS

BC

USA

INC

1,187.502.375%

Due 11-13-19

11-13-1911-14-19

wd

Purchase

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S-204,038.40

2.125% D

ue 11-30-2411-13-19

11-14-19w

dA

ccrued Interest U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

-1,939.212.125%

Due 11-30-24

11-14-1911-14-19

dpInterest

FE

DE

RA

L H

OM

E L

OA

N B

AN

K -

ST

EP

UP

1,000.00

2.000% D

ue 11-14-2211-14-19

11-14-19dp

Sale

FE

DE

RA

L H

OM

E L

OA

N B

AN

K -

ST

EP

UP

100,000.00

2.000% D

ue 11-14-2211-15-19

11-15-19dp

Interest F

HL

MC

PO

OL

G14203

11.714.000%

Due 04-01-26


CASH LEDGERCITY OF CRAIG

From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19

Trade Settle TranDate Date Code Activity Security Amount

11-15-19 11-15-19 dp Paydown FHLMC POOL G14203 97.934.000% Due 04-01-26

11-15-19 11-15-19 dp Interest US TREASURY NOTES 1,406.252.250% Due 11-15-27


11-15-19 11-15-19 dp Interest US TREASURY NOTES 812.501.625% Due 05-15-26




11-15-19 11-15-19 dp Interest CHARLES SCHWAB LIQUID BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT

3.99

11-22-19 11-22-19 wd Withdrawal from Portfolio -2,752.7511-30-19 Ending Balance 125,443.16

Clients are encouraged to compare this report w

ith the official statement from

their custodian.

INVESTM

ENT PERFO

RMAN

CE

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

CurrentM

onthCurrentQ

uarterYear toD

ateLatest 1

YearInceptionto D

atePortfolio

0.110.34

2.132.34

1.89Benchm

ark0.15

0.322.11

2.312.00

Percent Total Return (Gross)

Perform

ance is Annualized for P

eriods Greater than O

ne Year

Cu

rrent A

ccoun

t Ben

chm

ark:T-B

ill show

n for referen

ce

Fixed Income Portfolio Statistics

Average Quality: AAA Yield to M

aturity: 1.61% Average M

aturity: 0.23 Yrs

ACCOU

NT ACTIVITY


Contributions 0

Withdraw

als 0

Change in Market Value

1,110Interest

2,695Dividends

0


PORTFO

LIO CO

MPO

SITION

Cash

31%

US Treas

69%

MAN

AGEMEN

T TEAM

Client Relationship Manager:

Amber Frizzell, AIF®

Amber@

apcm.net

Your Portfolio Manager:

Bill LIerman, CFA®

Contact Phone Num

ber:907/272-7575

CITY OF CRAIG - SCHO

OL FU

NDS

Account Statement - Period Ending N

ovember 30, 2019

Alaska P

ermanent C

apital Managem

ent Co.

PO

RT

FO

LIO

AP

PR

AIS

AL

CIT

Y O

F C

RA

IG - S

CH

OO

L F

UN

DS

Novem

ber 30, 2019

Yield

Average

Total

Mark

etP

ct.A

nn

ual

Accru

edto

Quantity

Security

Cost

Average C

ostP

riceV

alue

Assets

Income

InterestM

aturity

U.S

. TR

EA

SU

RY

550,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S99.08

544,92399.96

549,78015.92

7,5622,856

1.691.375%

Due 01-15-20

560,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

E99.65

558,02499.92

559,56216.20

7,0002,340

1.711.250%

Due 01-31-20

440,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.88439,465

99.92439,656

12.736,050

1,5291.68

1.375% D

ue 02-29-20480,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

NO

TE

S100.32

481,51799.95

479,77513.89

7,200925

1.621.500%

Due 04-15-20

340,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y N

OT

ES

99.63338,740

99.88339,602

9.835,100

1,4971.67

1.500% D

ue 08-15-20A

ccrued Interest9,147

0.26

2,362,6692,377,522

68.849,147

TR

EA

SU

RY

BIL

LS

500,000U

S T

RE

AS

UR

Y B

ILL

S99.00

495,00299.90

499,48514.46

NA

01.45

0.000% D

ue 12-26-19565,000

US

TR

EA

SU

RY

BIL

LS

99.78563,744

99.84564,119

16.33N

A0

1.510.000%

Due 01-07-20

1,058,7471,063,604

30.800

CA

SH

AN

D E

QU

IVA

LE

NT

SC

HA

RL

ES

SC

HW

AB

LIQ

UID

BA

NK

DE

PO

SIT

A

CC

OU

NT

12,53812,538

0.36

TO

TA

L P

OR

TF

OL

IO3,433,954

3,453,664100

32,9129,147


TRANSACTION SUMMARY CITY OF CRAIG - SCHOOL FUNDS

From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19


PURCHASESTREASURY BILLS

11-14-19 11-15-19 US TREASURY BILLS 565,000 563,744.420.000% Due 01-07-20

563,744.42

InterestCASH AND EQUIVALENTS

11-15-19 11-15-19 CHARLES SCHWAB LIQUID BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT

2.82

2.82

SALES, MATURITIES, AND CALLSTREASURY BILLS

11-14-19 11-14-19 US TREASURY BILLS 550,000 550,000.000.000% Due 11-14-19

550,000.00

Alaska Permanent Capital Management Co.REALIZED GAINS AND LOSSES

CITY OF CRAIG - SCHOOL FUNDSFrom 11-01-19 Through 11-30-19

Avg. CostDate Quantity Security Basis Proceeds Gain Or Loss

11-14-19 550,000 US TREASURY BILLS 545,182.92 550,000.00 4,817.080.000% Due 11-14-19

TOTAL GAINS 4,817.08TOTAL LOSSES 0.00

545,182.92 550,000.00 4,817.08


CASH LEDGERCITY OF CRAIG - SCHOOL FUNDS

From 11-01-19 To 11-30-19

Trade Settle TranDate Date Code Activity Security Amount

CHARLES SCHWAB LIQUID BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT11-01-19 Beginning Balance 26,279.3011-14-19 11-14-19 dp Sale US TREASURY BILLS 550,000.00

0.000% Due 11-14-1911-14-19 11-15-19 wd Purchase US TREASURY BILLS -563,744.42

0.000% Due 01-07-2011-15-19 11-15-19 dp Interest CHARLES SCHWAB LIQUID

BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT2.82

11-30-19 Ending Balance 12,537.70

Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Water

Wastewater Discharge Authorization Program

Post Office Box 111800 Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800

Main: 907.465.5066

January 7, 2020 Subject: Early notification of wastewater discharge general permits for Log Transfer Facilities Dear Local and Tribal Government Leaders: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is currently drafting two Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (APDES) general permits to regulate the discharge of bark and wood debris to marine receiving waters from log transfer facilities (LTF). The two permits are titled the Log Transfer Facilities in Alaska (AKG701000) and Clean Water Act Section 402 Modifications of Section 404 Permits for Log Transfer Facilities in Alaska Which Received a Section 404 Permit Prior to October 22, 1985 (AKG700000). Both permits expire on March 31, 2020. Background information Fifty seven (57) operators of LTFs submitted timely permit reissuance applications prior to the permits’ expiration date and have received administration extension under the expired permits. Until DEC re-issues these general permits, these LTFs are required to comply with the requirements and conditions of the expired permits. Description of discharge The LTF General Permits authorize the discharge of bark and wood debris to marine waters of the United States within the project area zone of deposit (ZOD). In addition to this material falling from floating logs to the sea floor, other types of pollutants may potentially be discharged into the marine environment as a result of LTF operations, including: • Petroleum products • Leachates from sunken wood debris • Sediment In order to ensure the protection of water quality and human health, the permit would set conditions on the discharge, including effluent limitations, and outline best management practices the operator would be required to implement. Facilities seeking to discharge a pollutant that causes or contributes to the impairment of waterbodies included on the CWA Section 303(d) list as impaired for failure to meet a water quality standard would be excluded from permit coverage and would be required to seek an individual permit. General Permit additional information General permits are unique in that they are not issued to a single operator, but instead they provide an umbrella under which any qualifying facility may seek coverage. Operators of LTFs

APDES Early Notification Letter January 7, 2020 that meet the eligibility requirements of the permit would be authorized to discharge after filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) with DEC if all conditions of the permit are met. The public has an opportunity to comment on and provide information on development of these General Permits, however public notice does not occur when qualified applicants subsequently submit individual NOIs to receive coverage. DEC anticipates issuing the two general permits by the early summer of 2020. The permits and would expire five years later. Opportunities for tribal and local government participation in this permitting decision DEC notifies local governments and tribes that may be affected by a permitted activity early in the permitting process. This letter is intended as an early notification to assist you in determining if your community may be affected and to inform you of the opportunity to provide traditional, cultural, or other local information you would like DEC to consider when drafting a permit that would authorize operators to discharge bark and wood debris to marine surface waters. Opportunities for tribal and local government participation in this permitting decision DEC recognizes rural Alaska has unique needs and considerations with regard to LTF discharges, and strives to issue permits that reflect a full understanding of local conditions. DEC would appreciate knowing how your area and resources may be affected by LTF discharges or if you have other pertinent information that DEC should consider when developing the LTF General Permits. Next steps After the permit is drafted, there will be a 10 day applicant review period of the preliminary draft permit. Following the applicant review period, there will be a 30 day public review and comment period. I will provide a copy of the public notice for the permit by mail or e-mail at the start of the public comment period. After the public review and comment period, there will be a 5 day applicant review period of the final draft permit before the permit is issued. If requested, I can also provide notice of the preliminary draft and proposed final applicant review periods. Due to the short timeframes for those reviews, notices are sent by email or fax. Please provide an e-mail address or fax number if you would like to receive notices for the preliminary draft and proposed final applicant review periods. If you would like more information or would like to provide DEC with information about this permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at (907) 465-5272 or at [email protected]. For technical questions about the permit, you may also directly contact the permit writer, David Khan, PE, at (907) 465-6855 or at [email protected]. Sincerely,

Gina Shirey Local and Tribal Government Coordinator Enclosure: Tribal Involvement in the Permitting Process postcard cc: Potentially Affected Local Governments Potentially Affected Federally-recognized Indian Tribes



To: Craig City Council

From: Michael Kampnich, Craig Council Member

RE: Employment with The Nature Conservancy

Date: 1-1-2020

As the City Council is aware, I am employed by The Nature Conservancy as their representative for Prince of Wales Island.

The Nature Conservancy is a non-profit conservation organization that works with many partners to further the interest of conservation of our natural environment. We have and continue to partner with individuals, agencies, corporations, companies and other entities with similar interests on Prince of Wales Island. As the Prince of Wales Representative for The Nature Conservancy I am involved in much of this work.

While much of this work is outside of the purview of the City of Craig, issues or projects may occasionally come before the City Council that The Nature Conservancy has an interest or involvement in. Should this occur, any position or advocacy I may take as a council member will represent only my thoughts, interests and positions.

If any issue or project, going forward, should come before the council that The Nature Conservancy is involved with, that the City Council may consider taking a position on, I will alert the council to this involvement.

The Nature Conservancy maintains a very transparent and independent approach to political advocacy and require employees who may be involved in political advocacy at any level to acknowledge the separation of Conservancy and personal interests as they engage in personal advocacy.

Michael Kampnich

Craig City Council Member

1

CITY OF CRAIG

MEMORANDUM

To: Craig City Council

From: Brian Templin, Craig City Planner

Date: December 30, 2019

RE: Capital Improvement Projects - Resolution 20-01

Attached you will find Resolution 20-01. The resolution identifies the city’s capital project

priorities for 2020.

The council annually adopts a capital projects resolution to guide staff in prioritizing projects and

capital funding reqests. Listing out city priorities is useful in identifying what projects are

important to Craig. This resolution provides guildance from the council to staff on what projects

to commit time and resources to. It also allows legislators to match local priorities with existing

or proposed funding programs.

Based on the approved list of capital projects, staff will begin working on project submissions for

the state legislature (usually due in February) and the congressional delegation (usually due in

February/March). Craig has been fortunate in past years to receive capital project funding

through the state legislative budget process, through federal direct appropriations and through a

variety of state and federal grant programs. Those projects were funded from lists provided to

the state from prior year resolutions. Due to the state’s fiscal position the last few years the city

has not received any new direct legislative grants for capital projects. It is likely that this year

will be the same.

Since we have several new council and staff members I have provided a brief description of each

project on the list.

The council may choose to edit project titles, discuss or edit project estimates, and move projects

up or down the priority list on the resolution. The resolution is generally intended to show the

priority of projects for the year but it is not uncommon for specific funding opportunities to arise

during the year or for staff to target funding requests to specific projects regardless of where they

fall on the project resolution.

Projects:

1. Development of Cannery Property & Harbor Construction - $12,300,000. This project

includes the non-federal share for construction of the new harbor breakwaters, harbor

float system, utility upgrades related to the harbor construction, and some of the upland

improvements. The city has likely secured all of the design funding for the breakwater

and design is underway. We are waiting on the results of a recent grant application

(awards should be announced in February 2020) that may be used to fund the harbor,

utilities, access, and parking design. The project listed in the CIP resolution and the

corresponding funding amount is for construction only. The USACE will provide

approximately $20 million in funding for construction. The city will need to be prepared

to make a minimum of $2 million available for breakwater construction at the time that

2

the construction contract is let out. Staff and the council are currently looking at funding

mechanisms (bond, loan, city funds, legislative grant funds, etc.) to meet this

requirement. The bulk of the $12.3 million funding item includes the harbor

improvements, utilities, upland improvements, roads/access, etc.

2. Water System Upgrades - $600,000. The city has a number of projects related to

upgrading the city’s water treatment and distribution system. These projects include:

Increasing chlorine contact efficiency by baffling the current contact chamber,

realigning the input of alum into the treated water, and making other changes to

the water treatment system in order to generally increase the treated water

production capacity at the treatment plan.

Demolition of the Spruce Street water tank to remove this unused tank from the

system completely.

Design/engineering for raw water transmission (from North Fork Lake to the

treatment plan) and treated water transmission (from the water treatment plan to

the steel storage tank) line upgrades and replacement.

3. POWER Building Renovation/Construction - $50,000. This project includes a number of

upgrades/renovations to the building that POWER currently occupies. POWER is

currently working with the Rasmuson Foundation to determine eligibility for grant

funding. Upgrade/renovation projects include roofing, stairways, etc.

4. Public Works Heavy Equipment Purchase (Second Garbage Truck) - $360,000. This

project includes the purchase of a new garbage truck. This project will allow the city to

phase the existing truck into backup status.

5. Public Works Heavy Equipment Storage - $400,000. This project includes the design and

construction of additional vehicle bays in the Public Works Yard for the purpose of

storing vehicles and equipment.

6. Library Expansion Planning and Design - $100,000. This project includes completing the

process to determine if renovation of the existing facility is feasible or if a new library

facility is needed and a portion of the design/engineering required for a renovated/new

facility.

7. Wastewater Treatement Plant Upgrades - $50,000. This project includes the purchase

and installation of a backup power generator for the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

8. Aquatic Center Repairs, Upgrade, and Expansion - $500,000. In July 2014 Jensen,

Yorba, Lott completed a condition assessment of the pool. This condition assessment

identified several million dollars worth of upgrade and renovation projects. The most

critical projects included the roof and mechanical systems. In 2016 the city completed

about $2 million worth of work that included a new roof and replacement of most of the

mechanical (heating) system. The city has continued to make additional improvements as

time and finances have allowed. Currently the city is working on refinishing the lap pool

and kiddie pool basins. The funding identified by this project will be used to

upgrade/expand the facility’s fitness area. This program is popular with the public but is

undersized for the variety of demands.

9. Micro Hydro Generator at Water Treatment Plant - $285,000. This project includes the

design and installation of a micro hydro generator inline with the raw water line near the

city’s water treatment plant. This generator would provide most of the power needed by

the water treatment facility and by the SSRAA hatchery facility co-located with it.

3

10. Skateboard Park - $400,000. This project includes the design and construction of a new

park facility with an emphasis on usability by skateboards. The park design would

include hard basins and other features common to skateboard parks. Staff is currently

meeting with the planning commission and local skateboarders to determine the best

location and to move forward with design, fundraising, and construction.

11. Firehall/EMS Building Construction - $4,500,000. In 2015 the city completed design for

a new firehall/EMS building to replace the existing firehall and EMS office. The new

building would contain office space, five vehicle bays, backup power, a training room,

equipment storage, and sufficient parking. The new building will be located behind

Thompson House along Cold Storage Road. This project includes construction of the

new building.

12. Bridge Structures Inspection and Upgrade - $150,000. The city currently owns/maintains

three bridges: False Island, Dog Salmon Creek (on PSN Road) and a bridge on the road

leading to the city dam at North Fork Lake. The Dog Salmon Creek bridge is fairly new

and the False Island Bridge is in good shape. The log stringer bridge on the road to the

dam was inspected within the past several years and is in usable shape. Both the False

Island Bridge and the bridge leading to the dam should be inspected and any required

maintenance/upgrades performed.

13. Wastewater Collection System (Lift Station Replacement) - $900,000. The city maintains

a number of lift stations throughout Craig. These stations are collectors at low points of

the wastewater collection system. The lift stations collect wastewater and pump (force)

the wastewater to the treatment plant. Several of the stations that the city maintains are

aging (some past their expected lifespan). There are no major issues with existing

stations but a regular scheduled maintenance and replacement plan is important.

Currently the city has identified three stations that should be replaced.

14. Asphalt Surfacing - $400,000. The city has spent several years putting asphalt on nearly

all city streets and the pool parking lot. There are at least two additional parking lots (city

hall and float plane facility) that are identified for asphalt surfacing. There are also a

number of repairs and short sections of street that were not paved. This project includes

asphalt surfacing for a number of parking lots and street segments.

15. Complete Phase II Improvements in Klawock Airport Master Plan - $2,650,000. In 2006

the State of Alaska completed the Klawock Airport Master Plan. This plan lays out

projected improvements for 20 – 25 years. The state has been steadily making

improvements to navigation and facilities at the airport which have helped facilitate

additional air carriers and routes and facilities at the airport. This project really

encourages the state to continue to seek funding specifically for upgrading the Klawock

Airport.

16. Craig-Klawock Separated Bike Path - $4,100,000. This project includes the design and

construction of a separated bike/pedestrian path from the Craig High School to Klawock.

This would essentially be an extension of the existing separated bike path in Craig. This

project has been on the Craig Tribe’s work plan on and off over the past 20 years and the

city has provided support and assistance with the project.

17. Connect Craig Tribal Hall to Wood Boiler – $500,000. This project includes design and

construction to connect the existing wood fired boiler to the Craig Tribal building to

supplement/replace use of fuel oil for heating.

4

18. Community Quota Entity Quota Share Purchase - $150,000. The City of Craig completed

their application to be a Community Quota Entity in 2004. This allows the city to

purchase and lease Halibut and Sablefish IFQ and lease it to local fishermen. The

program did not contain any financing for quota shares, just the opportunity for the

community to retain some quota in the community. Staff prepared a business plan for the

council after the CQE was formed. The business plan shows that significant cash input

would be required to allow purchase (even if a portion was financed). This project would

provide funds that could be leveraged to purchase quota share to be held by the CQE and

leased to local fishermen.

19. Upgrade and Expand Boat Launch Area at Industrial Park - $200,000. This project

includes the design and construction of a second (parallel) or expanded launch ramp at

False Island. This would expand the capacity for launching small craft and would

enhance the ability of the city owned boat haulout trailer to launch and recover vessels

using the ramp.

20. Float Plane Terminal Access and Parking - $500,000. This project would include the

land acquisition, design, and construction of new access to the float plane terminal from

Water Street that would avoid the multiple 90 degree turns to reach the terminal. There

are a number of access points from Water Street that would be logical to use as starting

points. The project also includes potential purchase of additional land and development

of expanded parking at the terminal.

21. Public Safety Building Siting and Design - $100,000. There has been some discussion of

a multi-agency public safety building located in Craig to provide space for Craig PD,

Craig Fire, Craig EMS, Alaska State Troopers, the Craig Jail, the court, and/or other

public safety agencies. This project would provide for initial concept design work.

22. Child Development/Daycare Center - $100,000. The council requested that an item

regarding daycare/child development be added to the CIP list for 2020. This project

would include investigation, initial concept design, and siting discussions for a facility to

potentially house the Craig Childcare Center, Head Start, and/or other daycare/child

development activities.

Recommendation

The council should discuss the priority of items shown on the attached resolution. The council

may also add, delete,or modify items as it wishes. After council discussion the council should

move to adopt Resolution 20-01.

CITY OF CRAIG

RESOLUTION 20-01 Establishing Capital Projects for 2020

WHEREAS, the City of Craig Council annually prepares a comprehensive capital improvement

program for the City of Craig; and,

WHEREAS, the United States Government and the State of Alaska annually prepare budgets and

appropriate funds to local governments and state and federal agencies for the

implementation of local and state capital improvement projects; and,

WHEREAS, the Craig City Council has identified certain capital improvement project priorities

for the City of Craig for calendar year 2020.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following projects, set forth in order of

priority, are established as the City of Craig's top priorities for capital improvement projects for

calendar year 2020:

1. Development of Cannery property & Harbor Construction $12,300,000

2. Water System Upgrades $ 600,000

3. POWER Building Renovation/Construction $ 50,000

4. Public Works Heavy Equipment Purchase (Second Garbage Truck) $ 360,000

5. Public Works Heavy Equipment Storage $ 400,000

6. Library Expansion Planning and Design $ 100,000

7. Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades $ 50,000

8. Aquatic Center Repairs, Upgrade and Expansion $ 500,000

9. Micro Hydro Generator at Water Treatment Plant $ 285,000

10. Skateboard Park $ 400,000

11. Firehall/EMS Building Construction $ 4,500,000

12. Bridge Structures Inspection and Upgrade $ 150,000

13. Wastewater Collection System (Lift Station Replacement) $ 900,000

14. Asphalt Surfacing $ 400,000

15. Complete Phase II Improvements in Klawock Airport Master Plan $ 2,650,000

16. Craig-Klawock Separated Bike Path $ 4,100,000

17. Connect Craig Tribal Hall to Wood Boiler $ 500,000

18. Community Quota Entity Quota Share Purchase $ 150,000

19. Upgrade and Expand Boat Launch Area at Industrial Park $ 200,000

20. Float Plane Terminal Access and Parking $ 500,000

21. Public Safety Building Siting and Design $ 100,000

22. Child Development/Daycare Center $ 100,000

APPROVED: January 16, 2020.

_________________________________ ATTEST____________________________

Tim O’Connor, Mayor Jillian Carl, City Clerk


To: Craig City Council From: Jon Bolling, City Administrator Date: January 8, 2020 RE: Draft Comments re: Humpback Whale Critical Habitat Designation Attached is a draft letter to the National Marine Fisheries Service commenting on a recently published notice of a proposed regulation regarding humpback whale critical habitat designation along the west coast of the United States, including Southeast Alaska. The council reviewed an earlier draft of the letter at its December meeting. Since that review I spoke with staff from Alaska Department of Fish and Game and others, and made changes to the draft letter based on those conversations. NOAA has set the deadline for the formal comment period back to January 31, 2020. I will submit the city’s comments to NOAA before the deadline. If the council would like changes to the draft, please detail them during the December 19 council meeting.

January ______, 2020 Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East West Highway (SSMC3) Silver Spring, MD 20910 Attn: Humpback Whale Critical Habitat Proposed Rule. Dear NOAA Staff: The City of Craig, Alaska opposes implementation of the proposed rule to designate critical habitat in Southeast Alaska for certain distinct population segments (DPS) of humpback whales, Docket Number 190925-0039 (50 CFR Parts 223, 224, and 226). The size of the proposed critical habitat area for Southeast Alaska can be fairly described as unjustifiable. The 22,152 square miles proposed for Southeast Alaska encompasses virtually all inside and outside waters in the region. Given the studies cited in the proposed rule regarding the use of Southeast Alaska waters by the distinct population segments, it is simply not credible to assert that every square mile of this vast area is critical to the welfare of any of the DPS. While the proposed rule states that its “[c]ritical habitat requirements do not apply to citizens engaged in actions on private land that do not involve a Federal agency”, it is also true that very little activity occurs in the designated waters without federal oversight. Any permit requested for in-water development, many fisheries management decisions, all the statutory and regulatory issues related to the implementation of Alaska National Lands Interest Conservation Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Rivers and Harbors Act, the Clean Water Act, and a host of other federal statutes and regulations bring with them the federal nexus that will apply the rule proposed here to countless potential activities. While the text of the proposed rule tends to downplay its effect, the city believes the negative impact of the rule will be far reaching. The city’s experience seeking permits for even small footprint in-water projects bears this out. Federal resource agencies are typically unsympathetic to local public and private sector in-water projects even when those projects are well-planned and show a high degree of public support. Adding the proposed rule, which provides the most marginal of benefits to the designated DPS will make local public infrastructure projects even more difficult to permit due to the need for agencies to spend additional review time as to DPS. The result of those reviews will be subsequently subject to court challenge and as yet unknown judicial interpretation of whether the proposed rule is properly implemented. The proposed rule adds unneeded regulatory burden and makes the outcome of the permitting process less predictable, with no proportional benefit to the DPS. Remarkably, the proposed rule extends its reach to include “US Forest Service activities (related to timber and forest management)” and to “inland activities (including power plant operations, land management pesticide/herbicide application, and…NPDES permitting”. Ironically, such language would extend humpback whale critical habitat regulation into upland areas that are uninhabitable by whales. Furthermore, the explicit reference to “timber” is not explained in light

of the recreational, silviculture, habitat restoration, mineral exploration and extraction, road construction and maintenance, and many other activities that routinely occur on the national forest. The city finds it astonishing that the text of the proposed rule could apply to thousands of square miles of Southeast Alaska uplands in addition to the already overstated critical habitat area of marine waters. Based on the city’s understanding of work completed by Wade (2017), the vast majority of the whales found in Southeast Alaska are part of the Hawaii DPS, which is not ESA listed. Furthermore we understand from Wade that only about 2% of the Mexico DPS is thought to be found in Southeast Alaska at any given time. As a result, Southeast Alaska should be considered peripheral and nonessential habitat for the Mexico DPS, and not subject to the ESA critical habitat designation. The absolute scarcity of Mexico DPS in the region does not support NMFS’s estimated conservation value for Southeast Alaska as “medium”. The small fraction of Mexico DPS animals here runs contrary to the estimated conservation value. The habitat value is better described as “low”. As to NMFS’s approach to determine economic impacts of the critical habitat designation, the approach almost certainly underestimates the true economic impact of the proposed designation because the approach focuses solely on the added cost for NMFS to consider impacts to critical habitat. This scope of review appears wholly inadequate given the rule’s own expansive text at pages 54375 and 54382 of the October 9, 2019 edition of the Federal Register, where no fewer than twelve broadly worded activities are described that would be subject to the rule. While the draft economic analysis addresses each of these twelve activities, the text in the economic analysis tends to downplay the authority of the rule to the point where the reader would believe the rule inapplicable to the very activities subject to the rule. Finally, the city calls on NMFS to recognize the extraordinarily important commercial fishing industry in Southeast Alaska. The industry is the economic backbone of the region, and includes both the well-established and well-managed finfish and shellfish fisheries, and the newer kelp and seaweed mariculture efforts. The risk to the industry that is inherent in the broad brush application of an ESA critical habitat designation across the entirety of the region is at the forefront of public response from Southeast Alaska residents to the proposed rule. That risk easily outweighs the de minimis benefit to Mexico DPS of the application of the designation to our region. The City of Craig requests NMFS reevaluate the economic impact of the proposed rule in light of potential costs to industry and communities, and reduce the scope of the rule to exclude critical habitat designation to Southeast Alaska. The available science indicates that the habitat value of region as to the Mexico DPS is low, and not biologically important enough to warrant designation as critical habitat. Sincerely,

CITY OF CRAIG


From: Craig City Planner


RE: Recommendations on the Cannery Site Harbor and Upland Development

Background. As the council is aware, staff, the planning commission, and the harbor advisory

committee have been working on recommendations related to the harbor and upland

development at the Craig Cannery Site here in Craig since the workshop that was held in

February. In addition to working on the development recommendations staff has been working

with the USACE and the council regarding the breakwater design and funding for construction.

On November 15th

the planning commission and harbor advisory committee met in a joint

workshop to discuss their recommendations. More details on each group’s process and their

recommendations are contained on the two attached memos (one from the harbor advisory

committee and one from the planning commission).

If construction funding proceeds as anticipated, a rough timeline (timeline may change based on

construction needs and funding availability) for development is as follows:

1. Breakwater Design Complete: ±September 2020

2. Harbor Design Complete: ±December 2020

3. Breakwater Construction Start: ±Spring 2021

Complete: ±September 2022

4. Harbor Construction Start: ±Spring/Fall 2022

Complete: ±Fall 2023

5. Upland Roads and Utilities Start: ±Fall 2020


6. Upland Development Related to Harbors (parking, access, harbor facilities)

Start: ±Fall 2022


7. Other Upland Development ±Start 2024+

While we are still very early in the development process the recommendations by the planning

commission and harbor committee will help to guide the process in various ways, including:

Providing direction for the harbor design engineer on size, number of slips, amenities,

upland requirements, access, utilities, and other design elements for the harbor. In

essence, the recommendations from the harbor committee will be given to the harbor

design firm that is hired as a starting point for their design work.

Providing direction when conflicts arise between upland development and harbor

development. It is likely, given the scale of the project that there will be competing

harbor and upland issues, cost considerations, potential access issues, and long term

development goals that will have to be addressed throughout the project. The

recommendations are not intended to be inviolable, but serve to help resolve conflict

where possible. It is likely that the council will still be called upon to make decisions on

competing uses between land, buildings, space, and harbor development throughout the

project. Adoption of recommendations now will give staff some direction while working

on harbor and upland design issues.

Providing direction for long term development and use of the uplands.

Recommendations.

The council should discuss the overall process for development, the harbor committee

recommendations, and the planning commission recommendations. During the discussion the

council may amend the recommendations that have been presented. At the end of the discussion

the council should move to adopt the development recommendations (as amended).

Recommended Motion: I move to adopt the Craig Cannery Site and Harbor development

recommendations (as amended) made by the Craig Planning Commission and the Craig Harbor

Advisory Committee.

CITY OF CRAIG

MEMORANDUM

To: Craig Mayor and City Council

From: Craig Harbor Advisory Committee (Doug Rhodes, Chair), Craig City Planner,

Craig Harbormaster

Date: November 2019

RE: New Harbor Design

The Craig Harbor Advisory Committee has taken public input, looked closely at other

harbors in SE Alaska, and has discussed some of the features that should be included in

the design of the new harbor at the Craig Cannery Site. We are aware that some of the

elements will have to be discussed with the design engineer/architect for the project when

one is selected, but the recommendations below should serve as general direction for a

design firm to prepare initial drawings. The final recommendations approved by the city

council should be included in the scope of work as part of the solicitation for a design

engineer/architect and pre-construction design of the new harbor.

In addition to the recommendations below, the Craig Harbor Advisory Committee would

like to be involved in the solicitation and design process for the new harbor when a

design firm is selected.

Thank you for considering adoption of these recommendations.

The new harbor should be designed to accommodate 125 – 150 moorage slips and

larger vessel transient moorage.

Slip sizes should be distributed generally (more or less as the design permits) as

shown in the table below:

Slip Size % of Total Slips (approximate number)

Over 60’ 5% - 6% of total slips (6 – 9 slips)

47’-60’ (+/- 53’) 15% - 17% of total slips (19 – 26 slips)

37’ – 46’ (+/- 41’) 28% - 32% (35 – 48 slips)

28’ – 36’ (+/- 32’) 35% - 40% (44 – 60 slips)

21’ – 27’ (+/- 24’) 20% - 24% (25 – 36 slips)

Under 20’ (+/- 17’) 12% - 15% (15 – 23 slips)*

Large Transient Full length of the easternmost main float should be reserved for

transient moorage capable of mooring vessels in excess of 100’

o *The new harbor should be designed to accommodate a mix of slips and

skiff pullouts (under 20’) shoreward of the innermost main float. Harbor

access points (piers and ramps) should be designed to allow skiffs/small

vessels access to these floats at most tidal stages.

o *The number of small vessel (under 20’)/skiff slips/pullouts may exceed

the general distribution shown above by dedicating space shoreward of the

main float system.

o Larger slips should be located along the main floats closer to the harbor

entrance (east side of harbor basin), with vessel slips getting smaller as the

design moves to the west to allow for best navigation inside the harbor.

The new harbor should have 1 parking space for every 1.5 slips in the harbor

design dedicated to harbor use.

o The design should include adequate turnarounds, temporary parking, and

vehicle access to the new harbor.

o All parking, access, and other vehicle improvements will be contained

wholly on the adjacent upland.

o The majority of the parking may be located anywhere on the upland site,

but parking areas (short term) should be designed directly adjacent to each

access point

The new harbor shall have a minimum of two access points (pier and ramp), with

additional access points installed depending on the layout of the harbor to allow

for shorter access to the entirety of the harbor.

o One access point shall be a drive down ramp capable of supporting 20,000

GVW.

o Drive down ramp shall be designed to emphasize pedestrian safety by

separating pedestrian and vehicle drive down sections of the ramp.

o All secondary ramps (if included) will be pedestrian only ramps.

The new harbor shall have a landing/work float at the drive down ramp. The city

would like the design engineer/architect to consider design and provide input on

three options for the drive down/work float:

o Option 1: The easternmost main dock leg shall be capable of supporting

two-way traffic (20’ – 30’ driving width) the length of the float with a

turnaround area at the end of the dock leg.

o Option 2: The easternmost dock leg shall be capable of supporting one

way traffic (15’ – 20’ in width) with a dedicated turnaround/work float at

the end of the dock leg. Work float shall be a minimum of 60’x60’.

o Option 3: A work float (minimum size 60’ x 60’) shall be located at the

bottom of the drive down ramp.

o For all options, the work float shall have electrical service capable of

powering a portable welder

The new harbor should include water spigots along the float system that will

allow for shared use (i.e. no more than 100’ from a water spigot to any designed

slip).

o Water distribution system will be accessible from the floats to allow for

maintenance and repair.

o Water system shall be designed with main trunks and shutoff valves at

each major intersection to allow for maintenance/repair of the system

while still providing water services to the remainder of the harbor.

Electrical services (120/240v service) shall be installed at every slip 32’ or larger

and one electrical pedestal shall be installed within 50’ of any slip in the new

harbor. Electrical pedestals shall be designed/constructed to allow the city or

vessel owner to secure the electrical connection when not in use.

Restrooms shall be designed on the upland at each access point to the harbor.

o Restrooms at the drive down ramp access point shall have a minimum of

two showers in addition to other facilities.

o Restrooms at additional access points will not include showers.

A waste oil/solid waste collection point shall be included adjacent to the drive

down ramp.

The new harbor should include fish cleaning stations at the end of each main leg

with slips designed for vessels under 36’.

o Fish cleaning stations shall be designed with stainless steel cleaning tables

and water spigots.

o The design engineer/architect should present options to the city for fish

cleaning stations where the fish waste can be collected and dumped in

deep water by harbor staff.

Additional upland support facilities to include:

o Area for loaner life jackets

o Spill response storage

o Dock cart storage area

A draft CONCEPT plan of the new harbor is attached and should be included with the

design recommendations in the scope of work for harbor design services. This drawing is

not intended to be to scale, or to specifically direct the design, but is intended to

demonstrate general layout and conceptual design elements.

The harbor committee is glad to have had the opportunity to weigh in on the design of the

new harbor and looks forward to working with the council, staff, and the design firm

throughout the design process.

Harbor Layout

Concept - 2019

CITY OF CRAIG


From: Craig Planning Commission

Date: November 26, 2019

RE: Cannery Site Harbor Development – Recommendations on the Cannery Site Upland

Development

Background. As the council is aware, staff, the planning commission, and the harbor advisory

committee have been working on recommendations related to the harbor and upland

development at the Craig Cannery Site here in Craig. The planning commission met with the

city council and harbor committee in a joint workshop in February 2019 to discuss the planning

process for the harbor and upland development. The planning commission reviewed the 2007

development plan recommendations and discussed the upland development at regular meetings

in March, April, May, July, September, and November 2019. The planning commission met in a

workshop setting to discuss the development in May and again in October. At the May

workshop/meeting the planning commission formed a public working group to gather input from

members of the public. The public working group met in June, July, and August and submitted

recommendations to the planning commission in September. The group’s recommendations

were primarily about preserving/restoring existing buildings on the site. On November 15th

the

planning commission and harbor advisory committee met in a joint workshop and on November

26th

the planning commission adopted the recommendations shown below.

Recommendations.

Based on a review of the 2007 development plan; public input at meetings and workshops

throughout 2019; the recommendations of the public working group; and discussion with the

harbor advisory committee the Craig Planning Commission makes the following

recommendations to the Craig City Council regarding development of the Craig Cannery Site

Uplands:

1. Development of the Craig Cannery site uplands should be undertaken in a way that:

o Recognizes and seeks to preserve and maintain the historic character of the site.

o Maintains and enhances its present day value as a recreational and social

gathering site.

o Provides future civic and economic benefits to the residents of Craig.

o Supports the proposed new harbor facilities.

2. The upland development should include adequate parking, installation of utilities, and

construction of road access to the site as needed for both harbor and upland development.

o The city should integrate the development into downtown Craig. Development of

the site should provide traffic flow, overflow parking for the downtown area, and

provide opportunities that will revitalize the cannery property as an attraction that

supports the needs of both local residents and harbor users.

o The city should consider at least two access/egress points to the site. The site

should connect through Water/Front Street and Second Street at a minimum.

o The city should plan additional access roads, cul-de-sacs, and parking to support

existing/potential buildings and development on the site when needed.

o Parking for upland uses should be calculated in ADDITION to, not a part of

parking set aside for harbor slips.

o If feasible, the city should locate a majority of harbor parking east of the

administration buildings to reduce impacts to existing buildings on the remainder

of the site.

3. The upland development should include green spaces and be pedestrian friendly.

o The city should retain the park and green space at the west end of the property.

o The city should develop a trail/boardwalk along the beachline of the site from

Front Street to Beach Road/Main Street.

o The city should develop pedestrian improvements and green space as part of the

overall development of the site to maximize recreational and pedestrian use.

4. The city should develop zoning and/or a historic district overlay that includes a mixed use

zone including appropriate commercial, light industrial, marine industrial, public, and

residential uses. Residential uses should be accessory to other permitted uses on the site

and contained within commercial/industrial/public buildings. The historic district overlay

should include design/construction requirements that maintain the cannery “look and

feel”.

5. After appropriate zoning and subdivision work is complete the city should develop, use,

and lease parcels and identified buildings for identified activities. Identified activities

include public uses, economic development, and harbor support.

o The city should maintain ownership of all cannery site uplands.

o Public uses are generally those buildings or developments where the

improvements are made by the city or other non-profit entities for public uses

such as a museum, public event venue, etc. Maintenance and operations of these

uses are generally funded by the city or non-profit agency.

o Economic Development may include development of parcels by the city or lease

of parcels (with or without buildings) to private entities generally engaged in for-

profit business activities. It is likely that the final zoning for the site will include

a mix of commercial, light industrial, public, and marine industrial uses that are

compatible with the overall development. Maintenance and operations of these

uses are generally funded by the private entity.

o Harbor support uses on the uplands include solid waste, waste oil disposal, harbor

access points, restrooms, parking, spill response storage, lifejacket loaner stations,

dock cart storage space, and other facilities required by the harbor or the harbor

department related to the new harbor.

6. Where feasible, the city should make every effort to preserve and maintain the historic

and cultural values of the site. The planning commission has identified the following

buildings, resources, and action as high priority:

o Preservation and use of the Administration Building is a high priority. The city

may consider using this building (or replicating the building on the site) as a small

business incubator (small lease spaces with common facilities) for local

businesses, artists, charter operators, etc. This building may also be a good

candidate for space to display artifacts from the cannery.

o Preservation and use of the Web Loft is a high priority. The city should consider

renovation/restoration of the Web Loft for continued use as a web loft (upper

level) and community event/meeting venue (lower level).

o Preservation and use of the Maintenance Shop is a high priority. No specific

potential use has been identified.

o Preservation, restoration, and use of other buildings on the site should be

considered on a case by case basis. While not specifically identified as “high

priority”, these buildings contribute to the overall historic character of the site and

should be retained if at all possible.

o The city should collect, inventory, and store artifacts of historical significance on

the site for preservation and future display.

o The city should secure the retort (boiler) and work to prevent additional

vandalism and decay.

o The city should have an engineer inspect high priority buildings (or other

buildings being considered for use, restoration, or preservation) for safety and

structural integrity. Unsafe buildings should be made safe or demolished and

removed from the site. For buildings that are deemed structurally safe and are

being considered for restoration or preservation, the city should conduct a

condition assessment of the building (to include cost estimates for restoration).

o The city should complete a historical/archeological survey of the overall site

before beginning any ground disturbing activities. This survey should determine

the local, regional, and national significance of the site and make

recommendations for documentation, stabilization, and/or preservation of the

most significant features and structures.

o As a minimum, and based on the recommendations of the historical/archeological

survey, the city should conduct extensive photo documentation of the site, the

buildings, and other improvements prior to renovation/removal of buildings or

other construction activities on the site.

o The city should conduct hazardous material testing on buildings before

renovation, restoration, removal, or other construction activities on the buildings.


To: Mayor O’Connor and Craig City Council From: Jillian Carl, City Clerk Date: January 16, 2020 RE: Vehicles for Hire Application Attached you will find Vehicles for Hire business license application and letter. Section 5.20.010 of the Craig Municipal Code requires a new vehicle for hire business to apply to the council for a certificate to operate. The Council can look over and request more information as need regarding the VFH application. The attached letter was written by Christopher Raigosa. Christopher Raigosa, owner of the potential taxi service, CARide has submitted all the required documents required under section 5.20.030. including documentation authorizing his two drivers, Jason Onalik and Elmer Carteeti, both of whom have cab driving experience. CARride has met all VFH requirements including providing proof of insurance and passed inspections made by Shuab-Ellison and the Craig Police Department., Chief RJ has given verbal approval of all drivers that have submitted applications. During New Years, Mayor O’Connor and Jon approved a temporary permit to CARide for 72 hour period to help keep the community safe over the dates of December 31st - January 2nd. For this temporary permit, Christopher was required to have all of his paperwork in prior. According to the municipal code; In making the above findings, the council shall take into consideration the number of vehicles for hire or shuttle services already in operation, whether existing transportation is adequate to meet the public need, the probable effect of increased service on local traffic conditions, and the character, experience, and responsibility of the applicant Recommendation Approve VFH permit to CARide


To: Craig City Council From: Jon Bolling, City Administrator Date: January 9, 2020 RE: Consider Response to Correspondence from SARDFA Attached is a letter from the Southeast Alaska Regional Dive Fisheries Association. SARDFA seeks the City of Craig’s support for its appeal to Governor Dunleavy to sustain funding for paralytic shellfish poisoning testing at the state’s Environmental Health Laboratory in Anchorage. As the council is aware, before shellfish is commercially harvested, samples of the product are collected and shipped to the Anchorage lab to be tested for PSP. If levels of the PSP toxin in the samples are above the thresholds set to protect public health, commercial harvest in the area from which the samples were taken does not take place. The longstanding practice apparently has been that the commercial divers as a group pay for the sample collection and shipping of the geoduck samples to the lab, and the State of Alaska pays the cost of the testing. That practice would change in the proposed 2021 state budget; the budget calls for the state to assess a fee of between $400 and $700 per sample test, based on the attached letter. It is my understanding that the oyster farms face the same fee changes as do the commercial geoduck divers. SARDFA maintains that the testing costs are most properly borne by the State of Alaska. The council should discuss this policy matter. If there is agreement among the council on how to respond to SARDFA, the council can direct staff to contact SARDFA and, if appropriate, the State of Alaska.

1

Phil Doherty – Co-Executive Director Kate Sullivan Co-Executive Director PO Box 5417 Ketchikan, Alaska 99901 1-907-225-2853 [email protected]

www.sardfa.org

December 27, 2019 RE: 2020_21 Budget Dear Governor Dunleavy, The Southeast Alaska Regional Dive Fisheries Association (SARDFA) is a private non-profit, economic development organization representing approximately 180-200 harvest divers, processors, and communities of Southeast Alaska. SARDFA has significant concerns related to the proposed ADEC shellfish program and ADFG dive fishery budget cuts. SARDFA was formed in 1998 under Alaska statute 43.76.150-210 which established mandatory taxes on the dive fisheries in order to pay the State of Alaska to manage, assess, and research red sea urchins, geoduck clams, and sea cucumbers. All other monies generated by SARDFA, but not paid directly to ADF&G are used for required testing, administrative overhead, and research. SARDFA works cooperatively with ADF&G in developing its Annual Operating Plan, which determines how the dive assessments (self-imposed tax on the dive resources) will be spent. The Governor’s proposed 2021 budget is calling for significant reductions in the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) budget at the Environmental Health Laboratory (EHL) in Anchorage, for the testing of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) in commercially harvested geoduck clams and mariculture bivalves. The budget is also calling for a reduction of $19,900 to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game dive fishery management budget.

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) budget Currently DEC does not charge a user fee for PSP testing. A user fee of approximately $400 to $700 per PSP sample is being talked about (exact costs to DEC/EHL is still uncertain at this date). It was with SARDFA’s support in 2009 and 2010 that the Legislature realized the importance of EHL’s testing and added funds to DEC’s budget to pay for the PSP testing. While SARDFA does not directly pay for the PSP testing at EHL, SARDFA does pay for all the sampling and shipping of the geoduck clams to Anchorage on a weekly basis starting in September until the end of the season in mid-spring. The money to pay for the sampling and shipping comes from the 7% ex-vessel value tax imposed on the fishery under 43.76.150-210. This is an extremely expensive program for the commercial geoduck fishery, in fact it is the largest portion of the geoduck budget. During the past five years sampling has cost SARDFA geoduck divers between $115,000 to $176,000 annually. SARDFA geoduck divers also pay $20,000 for water quality sampling and testing at EHL, $17,000 for inorganic arsenic testing, and $25,000 to ADF&G for management and assessment of geoducks.

S Southeast A Alaska R Regional D Dive F Fisheries A Association

Mission Statement: To develop, expand, and enhance new and existing dive fisheries in Southeast Alaska.

S ARDFA

http://www.sardfa.org/

2

On average over the past five years the geoduck divers are paying $200,000 a year to meet Federal and State requirements and SARDFA’s administrative costs.

In recent years the PSP levels have changed drastically in Southeast Alaska. Up to 5 years ago approximately 80% of the PSP tests passed, allowing for live sale to China and other markets. In the last 5 years approximately 70% of the tests failed. As a result, testing costs have increased and harvesting has declined. In the past two years we have been unable to land the entire Guideline Harvest Level (GHL) resulting in less assessment tax funds. Any further costs to this fishery, including added DEC costs, may very well shut this fishery down. SARDFA understands that this Administration may have DEC charge a minimum of $400 per PSP sample, and as much as $700 per sample. Even at $400 per sample SARDFA geoduck divers would be paying, on average, an extra $57,840 per year based on the last five years.

Number of Geoduck PSP Samples 2014_2019

# samples @ $400 per sample 2014_15 164 $65,600 2015_16 128 $51,200 2016_17 155 $62,000 2017_18 168 $67,200 2018_19 108 $43,200

145 annual $57,840 annual

average average

SARDFA geoduck divers do not have money in their budget to meet this added cost.

Total Expenditures

PSP Sampling Costs Total Assessment Tax PSP, Water Quality, Year End Balance

Arsenic, Admin.

2018_19 Geoduck Money $134,000.00 $220,142 $284,960 -$64,818 2017_18 Geoduck Money $176,055.00 $267,360 $321,875 -$54,515 2016_17 Geoduck Money $120,714.29 $171,075 $258,937 -$87,862 2015_16 Geoduck Money $114,874.85 $232,294 $216,249 $16,044 2014_15 Geoduck Money $140,576.99 $203,856 $258,423 -$54,566

Totals

$1,094,727 $1,340,444 -$245,716

3

Besides the 7% assessment tax on the fishery the geoduck fishery also pays a 3% State Fisheries Tax. In the last ten years the geoduck fishery has paid an annual average of $120,000 in State Fisheries Taxes. If the geoduck fishery is forced to close due to added PSP testing costs, the State would lose money. It makes no sense to force a commercial (and mariculture) fishery to close when the State ends up being the loser.

SARDFA geoduck divers do not believe that the State is subsidizing the shellfish industry as expressed by DEC Commissioner Jason Brune (KMXT Radio 12/23/2019). SARDFA feels it's a public health issue and that's the State's responsibility. The State of Alaska is the only State in the Union that does not pay for the costs of PSP sampling and testing. No other State passes this public health responsibility on to the industry. In this perspective it is SARDFA that is subsidizing the state of Alaska program due to the significant financial contribution of collecting and shipping samples.

Geoduck

Ex-vessel

Value 3% State Fish Tax

2008-09 $3,318,467 $99,554.01 2009-10 $4,031,868 $120,956.04 2010-11 $5,924,059 $177,721.77 2011-12 $4,651,128 $139,533.84 2012-13 $5,707,754 $171,232.62 2013-14 $2,912,222 $87,366.66 2014-15 $3,799,732 $113,991.96 2015-16 $2,663,995 $79,919.85 2016-17 $3,819,429 $114,582.87 2017-18 $3,144,890 $94,346.70

10 year $4,000,000 $120,000 Average

4

Alaska Department of Fish and Game Budget

Along with the proposed cuts to the DEC budget, the current budget calls for a reduction of $19,900 in ADF&G’s dive fishery management budget in Southeast Alaska SARDFA is the only commercial fishery in the State that directly pays to ADF&G to manage and assess their fisheries. No other fishery, regardless of how big or how small does this. SARDFA Annual Payment to ADF&G from Tax Assessment

Sea Cucumbers Geoducks Sea Urchins FY01 $71,000

$50,575

FY02 $77,000

$31,648 FY03 $45,000

$35,000

FY04 $53,000 $1,000 $49,000 FY05 $80,000 $7,610 $35,000 FY06 $60,000 $10,000 $0 FY07 $66,660 $10,000 $14,477 FY08 $80,000 $27,650 $17,347 FY09 $43,757 $27,650 $6,924 FY10 $93,757 $27,653 $6,923 FY11 $73,900 $20,000 $0 FY12 $78,900 $68,500 $2,000 FY13 $78,900 $41,000 $0 FY14 $78,900 $25,000 $0 FY15 $78,900 $25,000 $0 FY16 $78,900 $25,000 $0 FY17 $78,900 $25,000 $0 FY18 $78,900 $25,000 $0

$1,296,374 $366,063 $248,894 $1,911,331

We see no reason to increase our payments to the State by close to 20% while all other commercial fisheries are not paying the same. SARDFA and ADF&G are in the 2nd year of a five year Cooperative Agreement (COOP-19-047) which identifies funding amounts and plans for the expenditure of dive fishery assessment funds for fiscal years 2019 through 2023, with each fiscal year beginning July 1, and ending June 30 the following calendar year. Funds are used by ADF&G to support management and stock assessment necessary for sea cucumber, geoduck, and red sea urchin commercial fisheries. We believe any type of increase to SARDFA’s contribution to ADFG goes against this Cooperative Agreement. In fact, it is spelled out in the Agreement that SARDFA:

5

“Enter into negotiation with ADF&G to revise level of funding transferred to ADF&G if expenses become cost prohibitive to completing objectives”. This proposed budget goes contrary to our legal agreement with ADF&G. SARDFA supports well managed, sustainable fisheries. SARDFA supports all aspects of public health in the geoduck clam fishery. SARDFA not only supports but has paid for the vast majority of those costs directly from the commercial fishermen. However, SARDFA, especially in the geoduck clam fishery, has no extra funds and would be looking at the real possibility of having this fishery closed. There are no other funds available for this fishery. Winter-time fisheries are an important economic generator in Southeast Alaska. The commercial dive fisheries support year-round processing facilities, employ approximately 100-150 tenders and allow fishermen to keep fishing vessels operating year-round. Impacts of these proposed budget cuts would ripple across the region. SARDFA is asking the State to realize the importance of this fishery and the importance of supporting the public health. The best way to do this is to support DEC’s and ADF&G’s budget.

Sincerely, Kate Sullivan – Co-Executive Director Phil Doherty – Co-Executive Director cc: SARDFA Board of Directors Rep. Dan Ortiz Liz Harpold Rep. Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins Reid Harris Sen. Bert Stedman Pete Ecklund Dave Scott Rep. Louise Stutes Sen. Click Bishop Sen. Tom Begich Sen. Peter Micciche Jason W. Brune, Commissioner DEC Margo Reveil – ASGA Jon Bolling

Member of: Southeast Conference

United Fishermen of Alaska PACRIM Shellfish Sanitation Association

Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference

CITY OF CRAIG

MEMORANDUM To: Craig City Council

From: Brian Templin, City Planner


RE: Reappointment of Sharilyn Zellhuber and Barbara Stanley to the Craig Planning

Commission

The Craig Planning Commission consists of five volunteer community members

appointed by the mayor and ratified by the city council. Each year there are one or two

positions that need to be appointed or reappointed. Past practice has been to reappoint

commissioners who have done a good job and are interested in reappointment. Several of

the commissioners have been on the planning commission for a long period of time. We

have two commissioner’s terms expiring at the end of January. Both commissioners have

asked to be reappointed to the commission.

Sharilyn Zellhuber was appointed to the Craig Planning Commission in 2008 to fill a

vacant seat on the commission and was reappointed in 2009, 2011, 2014 and 2017.

Sharilyn has done an outstanding job on the commission and has emailed me that she

would be interested in serving one more year on the commission. Staff will start to

advertise and review candidates for the commission near the end of the one year

reappointment. At that time the mayor will appoint someone to fill the remainder of the

three year term to expire in January 2023.

Barb Stanley was appointed to the commission in 2008 and has done an outstanding job

and has been a effective member of the planning commission since then. Barb has

emailed me that she is interested in another full term on the commission. The

reappointment will be for a full three year term on the planning commission.

Per Craig Municipal Code 18.02.005 staff requested that the mayor reappoint Sharilyn

Zellhuber and Barb Stanley. The mayor reappointed Sharilyn and Barb on January 8,

2020. Just like with commissioner appointments, all reappointments must be confirmed

by the Craig City Council.

Recommendation: Confirm, by motion, the reappointment of Sharilyn Zellhuber to a

one year term and Barbara Stanly to a three year term on the Craig Planning Commission.

Recommended Motion: I move to reappoint Sharilyn Zellhuber to the Craig Planning

Commission for a one year term to expire January 31, 2021 and Barbara Stanley for a

three year term to expire January 31, 2023.


To: Craig City Council From: Jon Bolling, City Administrator Date: January 9, 2020 RE: Consider Bid Award, Craig Aquatic Center Pool Basin Refinishing Project Last month the City of Craig, through its project architect, issued public notices seeking bids to refinish the basins in the lap pool and kiddie pool at the aquatic center. The project scope also includes replacing about one-half of the gutter around the lap pool.

Bid Results A summary of the bid results is shown in the table below.

Bidder Dawson Construction

Orion Construciton

IslandConstruction

Base Bid $379,000 $579,000 $725,000Alternate 1 $20,000 $9,000 $40,000Total Bid $399,000 $588,000 $765,000

The apparent low bidder for the work is Dawson Construction in the amount of $399,000. The city solicited bids for this project last April. The low bid received at that time, $622,000 was beyond what the city was prepared to pay for the work. As a reminder for the council, the purpose of this project is two-fold: refinish surfaces of the two pool basins, which as reported in the 2014 Aquatic Center Facility Condition Survey, are nearing the end of their functional life; and replace sections of the lap pool concrete gutter that pool staff tells me are in very poor condition. The “Base Bid” includes all work needed to remove the existing surfacing of the two pools and replace it with a durable, new quartz aggregate finish. The Base Bid work also includes replacing the tiles in each lane of the lap pool, and the tile around the perimeter of the lap pool and kiddie pool. The “Alternate 1” item is the cost to replace the whale mosaic in the kiddie pool.

Financing Options While the latest bid results are a $223,000 improvement over the bid process from last April, the low bid amount is still higher than I had hoped it would be. Still, the council has options to consider to fund the project. As a start, I recommend that the city reject the Alternate 1 bid amounts. While the whale mosaic in the kiddie pool is a friendly feature, I don’t believe it is worth spending $20,000 to replace. Focusing just on the base bid lowers the construction bid to $379,000. Adding back the approximately $15,000 cost to have the project architect complete negotiations with the low

bidder and oversee the construction administration brings the project cost to approximately $394,000. I propose that the city draw funds from two sources to pay project costs: 1) the city’s school support fund; and 2) the $2 million certificate of deposit currently held at Wells Fargo Bank. As to the school support fund, I spoke with CCSD staff again recently regarding use of some of the city’s school support fund to pay a portion of the construction cost. Given the benefit of the project to K-12 students at CCSD, the district is comfortable with the city using approximately $240,000 from that fund to contribute to project costs. It is my understanding that the $240,000 figure is about what the fund has earned in interest over past ten years or so. The balance of the cost, about $154,000 is best drawn from the $2 million certificate of deposit held at Wells Fargo.

Summary After two attempts to bid this work, it is apparent to me that this effort is a $400,000+ project. The city is in a better position in terms of bids today than it was after last spring’s bid opening. Craig Aquatic Center Manager Jessica Holloway continues to be particularly concerned about the poor condition of the concrete gutter around the pool, a concern that has also been echoed to me by a former manager of the pool. The need for the work is well-established, and the city has both the means to pay for the work and a competitive bid to consider to get the work done. Recommendation Award the Craig Aquatic Center Pool Basins Refinishing Project to Dawson Construction in the amount of $379,000, and appropriate $15,000 for construction administration from the funding sources recommended in this memo. Recommended motion: I move to award the Craig Aquatic Center Pool Basins Refinishing Project to Dawson Construction in the amount of $379,000, and appropriate an additional $15,000 for construction administration, from the funding sources recommended by staff.

CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2020 ...

Documents

Transcript of CITY OF CRAIG COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2020 ...