CI-08-13373 - IIS Windows Server

��

��

� � � � � � � �

� � � � � � ��

� � � � � � � � � �

��

�� !��"��#$��

%��&�� $��'��(��) ��*��$��#��$��

+��$��%��

,��-��.�� !��/��"��#��0��

,�1��'��1��/��'��!��

!$2��'�$�� .��(��)

��0��'��

��3456�%�� $��7,��

��

��0��+��$��

��$�� !0��/��

'��1��

��

��8��!��$��.��

$��

'92-�:+��

�� !��

"��#��$��% &��

��

��

�� !��

��"��#$%�&�� "��'��

��(�&��)��*

+,��"��"�� -�� ,��!��&��&��

.�� "��"��-��"��

��/�&��"��/��0��"��!��0��"�� !1�&��2��)�3��

%��*

2��"�� "��&��)��"�� &��&

��(��&��.��&��&��

(��"��!�� &��&��+��&��

&��"�1��&��""��"��"�!��

��" *�4

2��52��,��"��&�� 6��"��(��2��!��

��&��"��*�$��"��5��

��"��"��!��+��

��1��3)��.��777��&�� *

��(��&��.��8��

��"��"�� 52��"�� *

$��"�� (��"��

��9��:��&��"��*�4

��(��"��&��(��,%2�+��(��1

��&�� *�2��5��,��$��

��;��"��.��

� <��"��"�� &��*�4

��&��&��+��1��"��(��"

��

With Obama’s Help, Commander in Chief Trump Will Wield Abundant ... http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/commander-in-chief_tru...

1 of 2 11/14/2016 7:12 AM

CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION33 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016

Published by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group Copyright 2016©

CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Page 230 of 256 Monday November 14, 2016


President Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 1 of 7 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:03pmPresident Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 1 of 6 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:06pm

ENTERED AND FILED PROTHONOTARY’S OFFICE LANCASTER, PA ***Electronically Filed***

Dec 28 2020 06:20AMAudrey Conrad

CI-08-13373

User

User

User

User

User

User

User

User

User

��0��2��$��;�$��.��$��

.��(��)

:2��'��

+��-��/��'��1��+��9�1

&��$��(��)

!�$��!��(��)

%�� +<��+��

*��<%<'��.�� ,��

:!��"��2�� *��.��

:!��-�!�"��

��+�� %��'�� $��.��

��!��2��%��!��=��1��=�

'�� ,��$��

��#� ��!��

!&�'��

(�$ ��

)��

*��

� ��

)��

$ �2��&��

=>*�

��

$ ��-��

=76*

��

�+#��

=�

��!��&��"��"��

��*�.��$��!��"�� <��

��+��1��&��

�� &� ��&��8��&��!��(��&�&��(��"*�4

��.�� &��"

��"�� (��?��&��(��"��@*5*��8��*�A�&��

��(��(��"��

��"��!��"��"�� *�4

2��"��&��&�"��

��&��*�B��&��$��:��

��(��.��&��&��

�� 3��"��2��(��"��

��*�-��&��*

+��.��)��"��&�� &��&��

��"��1�3��*

+C��&�� "��.�� &��:��

�� (��*

$��*

��

��

!��


2 of 2 11/14/2016 7:12 AM

CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 134 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016


CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION 31 of 256 Monday November 14, 2016


President Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 2 of 7 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:03pmPresident Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 2 of 6 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:06pm

User

User

User

User

Lancaster city council unanimously approves mayor's pick for interim po... https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/lancaster-city-council-unanimousl...

1 of 5 11/25/2020, 9:58 PMPresident Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 3 of 7 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:03pm


President Trump's Military Police and John Bay Page No. 3 of 6 Wednesday November 25, 2020 10:06pm

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,®

Registered in Pennsylvania1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com

[email protected]

STAN J. CATERBONE and THE CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Monday November 14, 2016_______________________

1. October 24, 2016 - Op-ed - Donald Trump's "Peace Through Strengh" Space Vision, by Robert S. WalkerA. July 7, 2008 - DEFENSE NEWS - Securing EW's (Electromagnetic Weapons)

Future, by U.S. Congressman Joe Pitts (R Lancaster County)B. 1990 - STAN J. CATERBONE and Robert S. Walker · DEFENSE MAPPING

AGENCY OF DOD CONTRACTING DOCUMENTS RE STAN J. CATERBONE AND AMERICAN HELIX

2. November 11, 2016 - "Donald Trump May Select an Archtect of Bush's TortureProgram to Run CIA" by Lee FangA. In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom of "NO TOUCH" TORTURE

PROGRAM by Cheryl Welsch

3. TRUMP MIND CONTROL - Google Search November 13, 2016A. STAN J. CATEBONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MIND CONTROL

4. With Obama’s Help, Commander in Chief Trump Will Wield Abundant Military and Surveillance PowerA. BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CATERBONE and

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPIN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

__________/S/____________Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se LitigantADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

®

Registered in Pennsylvania1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.comstancaterbone@gmail.com717-826-5354

CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Page No. 1 of 258 Monday November 14, 2016


http://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/


ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE

U.S. Supreme Court PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert

U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474

U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;

U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board – Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for KathleenKane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401

U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157



by Robert S. Walker and Peter Navarro — October 24, 2016

Editor’s note: Trump policy advisers Robert Walker and Peter Navarro return with a second

op-ed detailing the approach a Trump administration would take on national-security space

matters. Hillary Clinton’s campaign has been invited to submit op-eds elaborating on the

answers Clinton provided for our Oct. 10 article, “Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump weigh in

on U.S. space policy.”

America’s space program is suffering from significant under-investment — both the weak

Op-ed | Donald Trump’s “peace through strength” space vision - Space... http://spacenews.com/op-ed-donald-trumps-peace-through-strength-spac...

1 of 4 11/14/2016 7:05 AM






Obama-Clinton economy and a lack of strategic vision are major causes. Meanwhile, China and

Russia continue to move briskly forward with military-focused space initiatives. Indeed, each

continues to develop weapons explicitly designed, as the Pentagon has noted, to “deny, degrade,

deceive, disrupt, or destroy” America’s eyes and ears in space.

To address such emerging threats — and maintain U.S. strategic superiority in space — a “peace

through strength” Trump administration will simultaneously strengthen our economy and

manufacturing base while significantly expanding our civilian and military space budgets.

Trump understands, as Reagan did before him, that without a strong economy, there can be no

strong space program. It is not too bold to assert the maintenance of our technological and

strategic superiority in space is vital not just to national security but to our very survival.

Today, every aspect of our military force projection worldwide depends on our on-orbit

communications, observation, and intelligence gathering capabilities. Our ability to see and

understand potential hostile activity and to respond promptly and accurately is ineluctably

intertwined with our space capabilities.

While America’s space-based capabilities have made our military the world’s most powerful and

effective, an over-reliance on our satellite network to provide situational awareness on the

battlefield is now making America highly vulnerable to attack. Chinese and Russian strategists

understand this better than our own government. That’s why they are now aggressively targeting

our satellite networks – both military and civilian as the very concept of warfare broadens.

Against this emerging strategic chessboard, Donald Trump’s priorities for our military space

program are clear: We must reduce our current vulnerabilities and assure that our military

commands have the space tools they need for their missions. We must also reduce the cost of

space access and create new generations of satellites to deal with emerging threats.

The future military necessity of using smaller force projection into hostile arenas will demand

the speed and agility that only space-based assets can supply. Addressing current vulnerabilities

will, for example, require new generations of smaller, more robust constellations of satellites.

Because of their sheer numbers, constellations of micro-satellites will be much harder to attack.

To maintain and constantly upgrade these constellations, in turn, will require new technologies

such as persistent platforms, capable of robotically servicing and refueling satellites in orbit.

A Trump administration will also lead the way on emerging technologies that have the potential

to revolutionize warfare. For example, both China and Russia are aggressively moving forward


2 of 4 11/14/2016 7:05 AM






POLICY & POLITICS DONALD TRUMP ELECTION 2016 MILITARY SPACE

with a range of hypersonic weapons that are very difficult to defend against with traditional

air-defense interceptors. A Trump administration will increase the coordination between

DARPA, NASA, and the private sector to ensure the U.S. remains well ahead of the technology

curve.

To move boldly forward, we must recognize that many of our military needs can be met with

commercially available launch, communications, and observation capabilities. This business-

oriented approach will reduce costs while accessing new advances on a timeline significantly

quicker than current, outdated military procurement procedures.

Such an increased reliance on the private sector will be a cornerstone of Trump space policy.

Launching and operating military space assets is a multibillion-dollar enterprise employing

thousands, spurring innovation, spinning off civilian applications like GPS, and fueling

economic growth. Today’s backward-looking acquisition policies must be immediately and

substantially reformed as a priority action.

A key Trump goal will be to create lower costs through greater efficiencies. We must ensure that

space products developed for one sector, but applicable to another, will be fully shared, not

duplicated. It makes little sense to develop numerous launch vehicles at taxpayer cost, all with

essentially the same technology and payload capacity. Coordinated policy could end such

duplication of effort and could likely determine where there are private sector solutions that do

not necessarily require government investment.

America must continue to be a bright star in space that people all around the world will continue

to look up to with admiration, assurance, and hope. No space goals will be more important to

Donald Trump than defense of our nation and that a freedom-loving people will lead the way to

the heavens above.

_____________

Robert Walker is former chairman of the U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology

Committee and former chairman of the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace

Industry. Peter Navarro is a business professor at the University of California-Irvine and

author of “Crouching Tiger: What China’s Militarism Means for the World.” Both are senior

policy advisers to the Trump campaign.


3 of 4 11/14/2016 7:05 AM






CHAPTERDIVIDER






Log

HOME AIR LAND NAVAL EUROPE AMERICAS ASIA & PACIFIC RIM MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FEATURES

Features » Technology Watch Business Watch Interview Cover Story Commentary Special Report Top 100 Online Show Daily

ADVERTISEMENT

Securing EW's FutureCreate Single Leader To Direct Planning, Training

As a veteran of the U.S. Air Force who served three tours of duty in Vietnam

as a navigator and electronic warfare (EW) officer on board B-52s, I learned

the absolute necessity of brandishing a dominant EW capability. However, I

continue to watch as EW faces neglect in the doctrine, investment and

leadership of our armed forces.

We cannot afford to wait until the fighting starts to think about EW. By

consolidating leadership within the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)

and the services, creating more effective investment strategies and better

training our troops to utilize EW, I believe the future of EW will be

strengthened to the benefit of our armed forces.

In response to glaring shortfalls in EW realized

during Operation Allied Force over Kosovo in 1999, I

founded the congressional EW Working Group

(EWWG), intended to be a resource to Congress, the

Department of Defense and the defense community

at large about the need to invest in EW technology and capabilities.

The current operations in Iraq and Afghanistan again have highlighted the

need to strengthen U.S. superiority in the electromagnetic spectrum. EW

continues to save hundreds of lives by defeating improvised explosive

devices that use electronic triggering devices, such as cell phones and car

key fobs. But our adversaries are becoming more adept at operating in the

spectrum by identifying where we are vulnerable, and we must continually

learn to counter rapidly advancing technology.

However, despite the success in Iraq and Afghanistan, history suggests that

our EW capabilities will again face a period of neglect once current

operations slow down or the United States enters a period of relative peace.

Earlier this year, the EWWG held a series of panel discussions with key

By REP. JOE PITTSPublished: 7 July 2008

PRINT | EMAIL

RELATED TOPICS

Asia & Pacific RimLand Warfare

MULTIMEDIAFuture CombatThe Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS)program is ready to test a few components that soldiers may have in their handsWatch

C4ISR JOURNALStopping IEDsaming, training communities step up ...Full story | Related

ARMED FORCESSaving AfghanistanWhy the Iraq strategy isn't the answerFull story | Related

TSJ ONLINEDefusing a shifting threat Counter-IED training is moving target for techfirmsFull story | Related

Electronic Edition

Congressman Joe Pitts & Electromagnetic Weapons Page 1 of 63 Sunday, May 22, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 54 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 202

U.S. Rep Joe Pitts & Electromagnetic Weapons ArticlePage 1 of 202 Tuesday October 25, 2016CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Page 5 of 256 Monday November 14, 2016



people from our armed forces' research labs, EW chiefs from each branch of

the military and industry representatives to discuss the future of electronic

warfare.

In addition, the Association of Old Crows (AOC), an organization of EW

professionals, in a recent report, "Electronic Warfare: The Changing Face of

Combat," offered several recommendations to improve EW capabilities.

On the whole, EW leadership within OSD and the services is fragmented,

hurting EW budgets and creating inefficient planning and sometimes

duplicative EW programs. Unlike many other mission areas, EW must be a

truly joint capability. Yet, there is no single individual within the Pentagon who

oversees or coordinates funding, acquisition, training and planning for EW.

Likewise, within each service, there is no flag or general officer with

appropriate authority who can provide leadership for service EW programs.

To remedy this, an office within OSD tasked to guide joint EW plans, policies

and procurement should be established, along with the appointments of

experienced EW flag or general officers within each service. Leaders

understanding the value of EW is not the same as leadership, which is

necessary for effective EW practices.

The streamlining of EW leadership will then lead to more efficient investment

in present and future capabilities. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have

taken a further toll on EW systems and platforms, and many need to not only

be restored but modernized. To this end, the creation of a joint EW

modernization program, as espoused by the AOC report, would help identify

and prioritize modernization efforts and inject necessary funding for next-

generation EW capability.

The Defense Department should also authorize an EW Critical Technologies

List, which would help coordinate EW investment strategy, maximize limited

resources and stabilize funding streams for next-generation systems. This list

should be submitted to Congress on a regular basis.

We have seen that our enemies are able to quickly adapt and field deadly

assets; the United States must meet and exceed these challenges by

implementing proper investment strategies.

Our troops also need adequate knowledge and training. While each branch

of the military must provide its own EW expertise and capabilities, current

operations have highlighted the need for joint interaction and readiness. The

AOC has recommended, and I agree, that a joint services coordination cell

should be established to serve the combatant commands. The coordination

cell would work directly with combatant commanders and be ready to deploy

to help us control the spectrum from the first day of conflict.

Furthermore, just as there is high-level specialized training, such as Navy

TOPGUN and Air Force Fighter Weapons School for our fighter pilots, there

should be a similar joint EW training program so our war fighters know what

they need to know about EW before being deployed. Effective training and aCongressman Joe Pitts & Electromagnetic Weapons Page 2 of 63 Sunday, May 22, 2016





projected career path will help sustain the EW community for many years to

come.

EW saves lives, and we must not allow our EW capabilities to continue

eroding. Now is the time for the United States to capitalize on numerous

opportunities to improve and strengthen our edge in the electromagnetic

spectrum. These recommendations can secure the future of EW, keeping the

members of our armed forces safe and effective in conflict.

Rep. Joe Pitts,R-Pa.,is founder, Electronic Warfare Working Group.

All content © 2009, Army Times Publishing Company

Services: Help | About | Contact Us | Site Map | E-Newsletters | Current Issue | Register | Subscribe | Renew | Advertising

User Agreement: Privacy Policy | Terms of Service






Joe Pitts recognized as conservative 'inspiration' at GOP gathering in La... http://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/joe-pitts-recognized-as-conserva...

1 of 3 5/22/2016 1:03 AM







2 of 3 5/22/2016 1:03 AM







3 of 3 5/22/2016 1:03 AM






Court tightens rules in whistle-blower cases : National-World : Albuque... http://www.abqtrib.com/news/2007/mar/28/court-tightens-rules-whistle-...

2 of 3 3/28/2007 8:35 PM

Home › Business › National/World Business

Court tightens rules in whistle-blower casesMark Sherman/Associated PressWednesday, March 28, 2007

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court made it harderTuesday for federal whistle-blowers to share in theproceeds from fraud lawsuits against governmentcontractors.

The court ruled 6-3 that James Stone, an 81-year-old retired engineer, may not collect a penny for his role in exposing fraud at the now-closed Department of Energy's Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant, northwest of Denver.

Writing for the court, Justice Antonin Scalia said Stone was not an original source of the information that resulted in the ordering of Rockwell International, now part of aerospace giant Boeing Co., to pay the government nearly $4.2 million for fraud connected with environmental cleanup at the Rocky Flats plant.

Rockwell must pay the entire penalty anyway. The only question before the court was whether Stone would get his cut.

The company, backed by defense, energy and pharmaceutical interests, wanted the justices to restrict when an individual can collect for suing on the government's behalf.

The Bush administration backed Stone, arguing that it was in the government's interest to encourage whistle-blowers, even though the government keeps more money now that Stone has lost.

The False Claims Act allows individuals, acting on the government's behalf, to file fraud suits against companies that do business with the government.

If they prevail, they receive a portion of what the contractor must pay the government. Lower federal courts ruled in Stone's favor.

This site does not necessarily agree with posted comments, they are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Readers will be banned for posting defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy comments. Read our privacy agreement .

Add your comments(Requires free registration .)

Username:

Password:

(Forgotten your password? )

Comment:

STORY TOOLS

MORE NATIONAL/WORLDBUSINESS

SHARE THIS STORY [?]

E-mail story

Comments

iPod friendly

Printer friendly

Intel CEO gets $6.18M in 2006 compensation

New Mexico, Virgin Galactic reach agreement on lease for space tourism base

Union, suit factory working hand in glove Ten most e-mailed stories from abqtrib.com:

Editorial: Lobos coach has to win big to justify pay1.Can Northeast Heights neighborhood embrace new urbanism?

2.

The loopy legislation of 20073.Red-light cameras linked to fee drop4.Communities start cleanup after twisters5.New Lobos coach tells Giddens to get on board, stay there

6.

The man behind Mesa del Sol is no stranger to getting things done

7.

Sculptor Glenna Goodacre regains consciousness8.Kate Nash: Legislators had reason to be fed up with governor

9.

N.M. Medicaid changes worry hospitals10.

Today's Headlines Richardson's Quest LoboZone TribVid Events Calendar Restaurant Guide Podcasts Alerts Comics

Bill Richardson Log Roundhouse Report Food City ABQ AV Club Be all you can bee Trib Sports Extra Wolf Tracks Split Personality No harm, no Fowler High School Sports The Flip Side

National-World search abqtrib.com






Supreme Court puts limit on whistle-blowers in nuclear case http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0328Scotus-WhistleBlower0328...

1 of 1 3/28/2007 8:38 PM

Supreme Court puts limit on whistle-blowers in nuclear caseMark ShermanAssociated PressMar. 28, 2007 12:00 AM

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court left an 81-year-old retired engineer without a penny to show for his role inexposing fraud at a former nuclear weapons plant in a ruling that makes it harder for whistle-blowers to claim cash rewards.

James Stone stood to collect up to $1 million from a lawsuit he filed in 1989 against Rockwell International, now part ofaerospace giant Boeing Co., over problems with environmental cleanup at the now-closed Rocky Flats plant northwest of Denver.

A court eventually ordered Rockwell to pay the government nearly $4.2 million for false claims the company submitted.Stone could have received up to a quarter of Rockwell's payment, under the False Claims Act.

But Justice Antonin Scalia, writing in the 6-2 ruling Tuesday, said Stone was not entitled to recover any moneybecause he lacked "direct and independent knowledge of the information upon which his allegations were based." Scalia said Stone had little connection to the jury's verdict against Rockwell.

The company still must pay the penalty. The only question before the court was whether Stone would get a cut.

The outcome was cheered by business groups that wanted the court to limit whistle-blowers in false claims lawsuits.Since Congress reinvigorated the Civil War-era law in 1986, those suits have returned $11 billion to the government. Recent high-profile cases include settlements with leading pharmaceutical manufacturers.

James Moorman, president of the advocacy group Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund said that individualswhose information leads the government to pursue fraud can be told years later that they can't collect anything, Moorman said.






1 Covert Harassment Conference 1-2 October 2015, Berlin, Germany

2

3 DR. NICK BEGICH Mind Control: A Brave New World together with HAA RP -

4 The Update

5 DR. BEGICH: Hello, and thank you for being

6 here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for

7 putting this together.

8 Everyone hears me okay, yes? In the back?

9 Okay. Good.

10 All right. I want to give a little bit of

11 background in terms of my interest in these area s. For

12 those that don't know my family story, it really goes

13 back quite a ways.

14 My father was in the United States Congress in

15 the early 1970s during the Nixon Administration. He was

16 lost in a plane with Hale Boggs. Some of you ma y

17 remember this if you've got a little bit of gray hair.

18 Hale Boggs was our House majority leader at the time,

19 one of the most powerful people in the United St ates

20 Congress. He was also a Warren Commissioner. H e had a

21 strong dislike for J. Edgar Hoover, because he b asically

22 read everybody's mail, tapped everybody's phones ,

23 including the United States Congress, and then,

24 essentially, blackmailed political leaders to fo llow

25 whatever script he laid out.

1

Dr. Nick Begich Lecture Nov 2015 Page 64 of 132 Sunday, May 22, 2016





1 Boggs was a pretty outspoken individual. At

2 the time -- it was just before the second electi on of

3 Richard Nixon -- Boggs came to Alaska to work on my

4 father's campaign, which would have been his sec ond term

5 in the United States Congress.

6 Boggs, before they flew out on October 16th,

7 three weeks before the second election of Richar d Nixon,

8 began to talk about this scandal brewing in Wash ington,

9 DC. In fact, that very scandal, had it unfolded a

10 little bit differently -- for those that remembe r, the

11 planes disappeared.

12 Three weeks later, Nixon's elected for his

13 second term. It wasn't too much long after that that

14 the Watergate scandal broke. Agnew was thrown o ut of

15 office. Ford moved up. Then Nixon resigned. F ord

16 moved up again. For those that don't remember,

17 Rockefeller then slid into the Vice President's slot.

18 And then one of the old Manson women from the Ch arles

19 Manson days tried to assassinate Ford, which wou ld have

20 put Rockefeller in the White House.

21 What would have otherwise happened, most

22 likely, the election would have taken place. Ni xon

23 would have won. Agnew and Nixon would have been thrown

24 out at the same time. The Democrats would have

25 controlled the Congress. The Speaker of the Hou se would

2






1 have elevated to the Presidency. The Democrats would

2 have been in control. But the opposite, of cour se,

3 happened and history tells us a lot about what r eally

4 happened there.

5 Twenty years later there was a report, an

6 investigative report by a publication called "Ro ll Call"

7 in Washington, DC. That report was looking into all of

8 these various Congressional deaths. You know, p lane

9 crashes are kind of the hazard of political lead ership,

10 it seems like.

11 But in researching that, what they found in the

12 FBI files were a couple of telexes -- this goes before

13 FAX machines -- and telexes coming from Californ ia into

14 Washington, DC reported that two people had been found

15 at a crash site. Those sources were later looke d at by

16 the FBI to determine whether they were credible. A

17 follow-up telex came through saying, yes, they w ere.

18 That plane was never recovered. There were no s urvivors

19 officially; yet 20 years later, we find out, in fact,

20 there were.

21 So I know about conspiracies. Conspiracies are

22 conversations that happen in a room like this wh en

23 there's a bunch of people standing on the outsid e who

24 might not agree with us. But the reality is, ev en in

25 the political life, even at the highest levels, things

3






1 happen. Things happen that aren't easily explai ned.

2 Maybe a few decades go by before the truth is fi nally

3 revealed.

4 So I have a strong motivation foundationally in

5 terms of how I approach controversial issues. I don't

6 do it with fear. I 've been doing this work for over 20

7 years. Fear isn't part of the equation. In fac t, that

8 is the absolute adversary for getting anything

9 accomplished on this planet.

10 My interest in these areas started with HAARP.

11 And how many in this room do not know anything a bout

12 HAARP?

13 Okay. Well, that's a lot better than it used

14 to be. All right. It used to be the other way around.

15 Twenty years of this work and the work of others have

16 kind of brought this into the public.

17 So the first image -- I'm going to use HAARP as

18 sort of the backdrop as I move into the mind con trol,

19 mind effects-related technology. This is just a n image

20 in my part of the world. I come from Alaska. I don't

21 know if -- maybe I've come the farthest for this

22 presentation. But I appreciate being here and I

23 appreciate the opportunity to inform people abou t this

24 subject.

25 So HAARP is a large array, a field of antennas

4






1 in Alaska, currently 180 antennas. They're

2 approximately 20 meters tall. They have a cross dipole,

3 which you can see, which is the very top of thes e

4 antennas. And what these are designed to do is focus or

5 concentrate radiofrequency energy into a relativ ely

6 small space.

7 If you think about the energy of a flashlight,

8 for instance, or a torch, as they say here in Eu rope, I

9 shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,

10 and then it broadens as you get further away fro m the

11 source.

12 The same is true with radiofrequency energy.

13 You can think about it as an inverted funnel sta rting

14 here at the transmitter and then spreading out a nd

15 getting thinner and thinner, less dense, which i s why

16 the further you get away from radio broadcast an tennas,

17 the weaker and weaker the signal.

18 With HAARP, the opposite occurs. They have

19 figured out a way through what's called cyclotro n

20 resonance, which would be focusing or concentrat ing the

21 energy. So if you could visualize it, it would look

22 like sort of a cork-screwing kind of motion that got

23 smaller and smaller as you move further and furt her away

24 from the transmitter.

25 So it concentrates that energy or focuses that

5






1 energy so you can manipulate it in various ways. And so

2 the HAARP array, which was originally designed b y a

3 gentleman, Bernard Eastlund, who's now deceased, was

4 intended to do a number of things as a weapons

5 application. This is the earlier version when i t was

6 half the current size of the transmitter in Alas ka. You

7 can see the field of antennas. In this case the re were

8 90 antennas in the array.

9 And here's another image as they expanded the

10 array to 180. And another image showing the arr ay.

11 Now, they also upgraded the technology pretty

12 substantially over the years. So it became much more

13 efficient. So with a much smaller system you cr eate

14 much bigger effects.

15 So what does it do? Essentially, it 's sending

16 energy or focusing energy up into an area known as the

17 ionosphere, which in this image in miles -- I ap ologize

18 for that -- is approximately 37 miles to 620 mil es out

19 into space.

20 Now, this is a highly energized area. If you

21 think about radiofrequency signals or shortwave signals,

22 they would come from the earth, they'd bounce of f of us,

23 and then bounce back down to the earth to transm it over

24 large distances.

25 The ionosphere also is an area that can be

6






1 disturbed by solar radiation, radiation from the sun.

2 When it becomes destabilized, it interferes with

3 terrestrial communications of every kind.

4 So part of the idea in this technology was to

5 learn how to stabilize the ionosphere during the se

6 periods or deliberately disrupt the ionosphere t o

7 interfere with communications on a global basis.

8 Now, what caught my interest when I first

9 looked at this issue of HAARP was a very short a rticle

10 in a publication, an Australian publication, tha t talked

11 about this big system in Alaska.

12 Now, I come from a family that's pretty

13 politically engaged. Besides my dad being in th e

14 Congress, my younger brother just finished a ter m in the

15 United States Senate. My family's been involved in

16 politics a very long time.

17 Alaska is a very big region, but we're a really

18 small population; 700,000 people in our entire r egion.

19 And when you think about big projects, you know, you

20 think you know something about them.

21 Well, I 'm reading about this project in my

22 state in a journal in Australia and I'm going, y ou know,

23 why doesn't anybody know about this?

24 And so I decided I would go in and look into

25 this issue independently. And I did. I picked up maybe

7






1 30 articles and papers, design specifications, s ome

2 things, and with friends encouraging me to publi sh, I

3 published the first article that I had written o n HAARP

4 back in 1994. So it's been a very long time ago .

5 What also caught my interest was the idea that

6 they were primarily utilizing, in some applicati ons,

7 extremely low frequency signals or ELFs. These are

8 signals that can be biologically active, can aff ect us

9 as human beings and in very specific ways.

10 And in particular, certain applications of the

11 technology -- and this gives you sort of a graph ic

12 illustration of the focus. These view graphs, a ctually,

13 were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlu nd,

14 prior to his passing. And we utilized them in o ur

15 publications and in some of our work. So this g ives you

16 kind of a graphic showing the radiofrequency fro m the

17 array, moving up into the ionosphere and focusin g that

18 energy.

19 His initial concept was to create a global

20 shield, to be able to utilize the natural magnet ic field

21 lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy

22 into this and then create this kind of global sh ielding

23 effect. And the idea was that any electronic de vice

24 piercing that energy would be disrupted, like

25 satellites, intercontinental ballistic missiles,

8






1 virtually any electronic device that ran into th is field

2 of energy that was being amplified would be dest royed.

3 Now, one of the other interesting parts of

4 this -- and this kind of shows that, again, util izing

5 one of Eastlund's graphics. So you can see like a field

6 line and then you see this cork-screwing energy going

7 around it. That energy naturally is occurring f rom the

8 southern polar regions into the northern polar r egions.

9 And, in this case, they actually couple -- actua lly

10 utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the

11 natural energy, and then coming from the north t o the

12 south, create this cork-screwing effect, which

13 accelerates the electrons and then creates this global

14 shield.

15 Now, that was his initial concept. And as a

16 concept, it caught the attention of a number of people

17 and eventually got funding from the Congress, in itially

18 at 30 million, and over the last few decades now over

19 almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lo t of

20 money, but when you consider, this is sort of th e

21 pinnacle of bill ions of dollars spent in ionosph ere

22 research over many decades.

23 What caught my attention in terms of the

24 technology of Eastlund -- I'm going to skip some of

25 these that are not so relevant -- was the idea t hat you

9






1 could manipulate the ionosphere -- and I'll use this as

2 a better example. So one of the thoughts was th at if

3 you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosph ere --

4 so think about this energy going up and, like, a hammer

5 ringing a bell. Every time it hits that ionosph ere, the

6 ionosphere itself vibrates and then it begins to send a

7 signal in the ELF range. So you have a high fre quency

8 signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the io nosphere

9 which is energized then acts as a broadcast ante nna in

10 the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth , and in

11 this case covering an entire hemisphere.

12 Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency

13 signals, are very long wavelengths. They penetr ate the

14 earth and sea. They're utilized for communicati on with

15 submarines, as an example, the depth, because sh ort

16 wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea. They're

17 also used for what's called earth-penetrating

18 tomography, which in simple language or by analo gy would

19 be like x-raying the earth or looking into the e arth for

20 underground structures.

21 But one of the side effects of ELF is the

22 entrainment effect on the human mind. Because E LF

23 signals will lock onto in what's called a freque ncy

24 following response. And you can use a lot of di fferent

25 techniques to create a frequency following respo nse.

10






1 You can use flickering light, you can use binaur al beat,

2 which I'll explain in a few minutes. You can us e

3 electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the power

4 grid itself can be modulated in such a way to cr eate a

5 signal that the human body will join with, will couple

6 with, and begin to follow. It doesn't take a gr eat deal

7 of energy to accomplish this.

8 This is the one that triggered my real interest

9 in HAARP, because this is the one that everybody kind of

10 ignored and said, oh. In fact, the HAARP planne rs said,

11 well, if ELF has a biological effect, it 's a sid e

12 effect. It 's an unintended consequence. We hea rd that

13 phrase earlier today. But I don't believe that. I

14 believe that it 's an intended consequence. It 's

15 intended to grade populations in very specific w ays.

16 Now, this book was mentioned by my friend

17 earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by Zbigniew

18 Brzezinski. And why this is an important book, it was

19 written, actually, in 1973, when Brzezinski was at

20 Columbia University. This is before he became N ational

21 Security Adviser to President Carter. This is a round

22 the time that Kissinger and he and others were s tarting

23 to think about the Trilateral Commission organiz ing this

24 think tank, so to speak.

25 Now, find this book. I really encourage you to

11






1 find this book and read it, because it is not a

2 prediction of what will come with technology. I t 's the

3 blueprint, in fact. You can read this.

4 When I first read it -- he writes in a pretty

5 convoluted style. It 's a little difficult even in

6 English to understand. But I really encourage y ou to

7 read it because he predicted the economic change s that

8 took place, the political changes that took plac e in the

9 world over the last 40 years with a great deal o f

10 accuracy. And some will say it really wasn't th e

11 prediction. It was the plan.

12 If you look within this text between Pages 54

13 and 56, you'll see a section that's dedicated to the

14 kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind

15 control technology. And what Zbigniew reference d was a

16 guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald. And he was a

17 geophysicist at UCL. He wrote a book -- or, act ually, a

18 chapter in a book and the chapter was called, "H ow to

19 Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Ea rth Day,

20 okay, so he could get away with that. It was 19 69 when

21 that book was actually published. But what he s aid that

22 caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he s aid, if

23 we could ever figure out how to electronically s troke

24 the ionosphere in just the right way, we could r eturn a

25 signal to the earth that would influence the beh avior of

12






1 people over huge geographic areas.

2 Now, that's a pretty profound thing. But we

3 didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere in 19 69. But

4 we did by the 1990s. And that was, in fact, and is, in

5 fact, the HAARP system that can accomplish this.

6 So the idea was -- and it was kind of, in a

7 gross sort of way, primitive, if you will, but w hat the

8 intention was, was that if you could pulse the

9 ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you

10 could agitate the population in very specific wa ys. You

11 could make them passive, less aggressive, or the

12 opposite by just amplifying that signal. And I' l l

13 explain a little bit of that as we go on.

14 The other person that comes out in the last

15 presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book he wr ote,

16 "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychoc ivilized

17 Society". And this is, again, a 1960s book. Th ose

18 images that you saw in just this short video cli p of

19 Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as

20 well showing that.

21 But in those days they used implants. They had

22 to physically put something in the brain. And w hat Jose

23 Delgado originally did -- he was actually educat ed in

24 electrophysiology at the University of Madrid. He

25 graduated in 1950. Electrophysiology, as a degr ee

13






1 field, thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years a go, most

2 people don't even realize that's an area of high er

3 education today, much less that far back.

4 One of my mentors, Raul Makayla (phonetic), he

5 actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his

6 area of interest was, essentially, the same, bio magnetic

7 and electric fields, effects on human physiology , and he

8 spent his career studying that.

9 Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was

10 mapping the brain of primates and humans by stim ulating

11 various portions of the brain to figure out what was

12 responsible for what kind of activity. And then he

13 began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways in

14 those film clips with the charging bull and he t hrows

15 the switch and the bull stops, to demonstrate th at you

16 could take a creature from passive to highly agg ressive

17 to passive to highly aggressive, just like flipp ing on

18 and off the lights in your living room.

19 What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that

20 you didn't need any implants. You just needed t o

21 manipulate the energy itself. And you didn't ne ed a

22 great deal of energy.

23 Now, we've heard -- I forget the amount of

24 energy surrounding us now. Was it a quintill ion ? I

25 believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we he ard

14






1 earlier. Back when I wrote the HAARP book in '9 4, just

2 radiofrequency energy alone, it was 200 million times

3 more around us every day than nature created in 1994.

4 Now, when you think about it, what did Delgado

5 discover? He discovered that one-fiftieth of th e amount

6 of energy in the natural background noise of the earth

7 was sufficient to manipulate the behavior of hum an

8 beings if you could hit the right frequencies, i f you

9 could hit those window frequencies that stimulat ed that

10 kind of activity.

11 Now, if you think about this -- again, by

12 analogy, think about dialing through the radio s tations

13 on a radio. In between the stations you get the white

14 noise, the static, you get no clear signal. But when

15 you have resonance between the transmitter and t he

16 receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal.

17 The same is true in our physiology. Whether

18 you're looking at stimulating or affecting a spe cific

19 element in the body, molecules in the body, cell

20 structures or organ structures or even the human mind,

21 it's about manipulating the underlying energy.

22 When you think about medical science in terms

23 of how the fork in the road is and how this kind of

24 applies to why don't we know more about this tod ay,

25 well, there's lots of literature now. 25,000 so urces, I

15






1 think we heard quoted earlier today. 25,000 sou rces

2 talking about the energy interactions with the h uman

3 body. That is a lot of information.

4 But what happened in medical science? A lot of

5 people that went into life sciences, they were r eally

6 good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math , so

7 they went to life sciences. People who were a l ittle

8 better in the math, they went to physics. And t hen once

9 upon a time, these two came together and we got

10 biophysics, which is really the root of real hea lth

11 science. If you really want to get to the meat of it,

12 you've got to get to the energetic interactions that

13 create chemical reactions that then manifest in the

14 body.

15 And that's what we kind of miss in so much of

16 our medicine. We followed a pharmaceutical mode l as

17 opposed to an electromagnetic model. In the '30 s, prior

18 to World War II, that fork in the road was being

19 explored pretty aggressively, the energetic mode ls. But

20 they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we en ded up

21 with the pharmaceutical industry, and the result s of

22 that, I think we can all not be quite so proud o f.

23 In terms of where the technology is going and

24 where a lot of the science is going, it will be

25 electromedicine that cures most of what we call

16






1 incurable. It will also be that which enhances or

2 debilitates human consciousness itself.

3 Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you

4 didn't need implants, you just need to manipulat e the

5 energy itself, this became kind of the essence o f sort

6 of where everything went from there.

7 But I want to roll back a little bit, a little

8 bit back in time, and talk more about the evolut ion of

9 mind control as technology starting with the wor k at

10 Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, wh o was

11 working in the Harvard hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s.

12 You can look Estabrook up. Look him up at the L ibrary

13 of Congress and you'll see his list of publicati ons, and

14 I recommend that you do that.

15 What he decided was that you could create what

16 we would call today a Manchurian candidate. You could

17 take certain individuals, put them in a very, ve ry deep

18 state of hypnosis and then over a period of time train

19 them so they would be like this super spy that y ou could

20 send into another country and they'd hang out fo r a year

21 or two, but if they got captured, they wouldn't really

22 remember any of their former self, and then when they

23 came back, in this case, into the United States, that we

24 would then give them the appropriate suggestions and

25 then extract the intelligence from them.

17






1 And this is what Estabrook was working on. By

2 the 1930s, a lot of his work was being classifie d and he

3 continued to work in this field up through the 1 960s.

4 His last book -- and I always like to read the l ast

5 thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you a

6 lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there ar e things

7 that you might discard bits and pieces as scienc e

8 enlightens you and your experience enlightens yo u. And

9 what he talked about in that last book were the

10 experiments he was involved in using LSD and oth er

11 hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actual ly

12 talked about in a favorable sense.

13 And for those of you that remember, the CIA was

14 heavily involved in this in the 1960s and, in fa ct, the

15 whole area pre-1960s going back even to the Kore an War,

16 which is sort of my next mark on the timeline.

17 The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic

18 young Americans come back from war and they're h anding

19 out Communist leaflets on street corners, and th e term

20 or the phrase brainwashing came into being. Tha t's

21 where it came from. It came from that series of events

22 after the Korean War.

23 The idea of being able to manipulate people's

24 behavior and change them so profoundly became of

25 interest to the predecessor of the Central Intel ligence

18






1 Agency and then later the Central Intelligence A gency.

2 And what they looked at were lots of different w ays to

3 manipulate human behavior.

4 Now, when I was researching my first book with

5 Jeane Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was

6 looking for a good source document that would sp eak to

7 this, because you always read about this in seco ndary,

8 tertiary sources. And so I'm in a book room, a big

9 surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,

10 I really need this source. And as I'm having th is

11 conversation, I reach unconsciously behind me in to a box

12 and I pull out this book.

13 This is a really interesting one. This is

14 actually a presidential report. This is a repor t that

15 was commissioned at the time, 1975, to look at t he

16 abuses of the CIA. Now, this came out of the Ch urch

17 Committee reports, which were Congressional hear ings

18 that took place in the early '70s to investigate the

19 abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the k ind of

20 abuses that we read about today, because nothing really

21 changed. Supposedly, this was to change things.

22 Now, what's in this report? The LSD

23 experiments were in this report. The idea the C entral

24 Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltratin g civil

25 rights groups, antiwar groups, people that, esse ntially,

19






1 opposed the government within the United States, which

2 was not part of their mandate, in fact, was ille gal.

3 The fact that they were reading people's mail, u til izing

4 unwitting victims and experiments for mind contr ol. All

5 of this came out in this report in 1975. And ye t, the

6 CIA continues to do it even to this day.

7 Think about the kinds of activities that have

8 been reported pretty widely over the last few ye ars,

9 whether it 's digging through garbage to blackmai l other

10 diplomats, which is something our Intelligence c ommunity

11 does, whether it 's to send pallet loads of money into

12 countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe of ficials

13 as a way of doing business, or whether it 's to

14 assassinate people with drones, kidnap people an d

15 torture them.

16 Now, most of us don't know people like this,

17 but this is the government that I unfortunately have

18 guiding my country right now. It's a government of

19 criminals. Now, people want to talk about, oh, this

20 couldn't happen here.

21 It has happened here. It 's happened for

22 decades in the United States. This report by th e

23 President's Commission touches the very tip of t hat

24 iceberg.

25 This is another document. This is -- this guy,

20






1 Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel and ret ired.

2 He was involved in pretty much the sort of esote ric side

3 of some of the government research. This book - - this

4 chapter out of this book is called, "Low-Intensi ty

5 Conflict and Modern Technology". It was prepare d by

6 Maxwell Air Force Base in 1984. And it was talk ing

7 about a large -- a variety of technologies.

8 But in this particular one, if you look at,

9 certainly, the subject lines, you have stimulati on of ,

10 bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatme nt of

11 disease, healing of wounds. You look at behavio r

12 modification in animals. You know, some of thes e things

13 that are listed here were kind of under the myst erious

14 category. They couldn't really explain what was

15 happening in 1984.

16 But the idea was to stimulate research in these

17 fields. So a number of things happened. A lot of money

18 started to flow into these areas. One of the re ports

19 that came out in the 1980s as a result of some o f this

20 was the Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook. It w as a

21 big, thick handbook. It was produced by the Uni versity

22 of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to

23 determine the radiofrequency dosages that were r equired

24 to override every vital organ of the human body, whether

25 it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidne ys, just

21






1 sort of preempt their natural function to be abl e to do

2 it remotely.

3 And the idea was to take that leap of

4 technology and begin to apply it into weapon sys tems.

5 Mind control. "The Economist". Cover story. S ome of

6 you will remember this one. This is 2002, I bel ieve.

7 Yeah, 2002. And what this cover story was about was

8 about the ethics of mind control. Not saying, h ey, does

9 it exist or doesn't it exist? It's just saying it's

10 here right now. We really need to be debating w hether

11 we should advance this technology, whether we sh ould

12 limit this technology. "The Economist" is certa inly a

13 credible publication. Not too much happened fro m this

14 story.

15 This is -- unfortunately, it 's not showing up.

16 November -- you can get this one on my website. I' l l

17 give you my website, because this is a very impo rtant

18 document. The Navy set up a new set of regulati ons for

19 human experiments. It was approved in 2006. Yo u know,

20 in history, that's like tomorrow and yesterday, right?

21 It's, like, now. And in this they specifically call out

22 mind control experiments and who has the authori ty to

23 approve them. And the persons with the authorit y to

24 approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the

25 case of Navy Intelligence or Naval research.

22






1 Now, it's not just CIA. Naval Intelligence

2 does this work. The Marines have a section on

3 non-lethal weapons that this falls under. The A ir Force

4 has the electromagnetic directorate, which is wo rking in

5 an area called controlled effects, which deal, a gain,

6 with mind control and physiological effects on h uman

7 beings. In fact, they publish a publication cal led

8 "Technology Horizons". I believe it's the June 2004

9 issue. You can look it up. The cover story is on

10 controlled effects.

11 Now, what are controlled effects? The first

12 effect is attacking hardware; you know, like equ ipment,

13 like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of

14 electrons through circuits to disrupt those mach ines to

15 operate. Not using bombs and bullets and the th ings of

16 history, but using energy itself to manipulate h ardware.

17 The second sort of level of controlled effects

18 talked about in that article is the idea of mani pulating

19 the software, the systems that run those systems , so

20 that you can disrupt the software, then you disr upt the

21 hardware, and things collapse.

22 And the third leg of controlled effects is the

23 human operator. And what they say in this parti cular

24 article produced by the electromagnetic director of the

25 Air Force is that we can target or create the il lusion

23






1 of all of the senses in the human body; sight, s ound,

2 touch, taste, to give people complete memory set s,

3 complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be able to

4 distinguish the synthetic from the real.

5 Now, think about that for a moment. What does

6 that do to court testimony in 20 years if this b ecomes

7 the norm? They're now talking about using this for

8 post-traumatic stress syndrome folks, people com ing back

9 from warfare. This just sort of cleans up the g arbage

10 of the mind and gets rid of that stress. Some p eople

11 think that's a great idea. Personally, I think that's

12 the biggest mistake we could ever make. Because

13 whatever those servicemen and women were engaged in --

14 what used to happen in warfare -- what happened in World

15 War II when everybody came back, they said, I do n't ever

16 want to see my children in these things, I don't want to

17 see my grandchildren in these things. Wars need to be

18 put down, not amplified.

19 When you take the human factor out of warfare

20 and it becomes like a videogame, then our willin gness to

21 withdraw from direct conflict no longer happens.

22 And think about where our military science has

23 gone. In fact, I want to mention another very i mportant

24 publication. It was produced by the US Army War College

25 in the early 1980s. It 's called the "Revolution of

24






1 Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War". An d this

2 particular paper was talking about revolution of

3 military affairs. What is that exactly?

4 This is a leap as important as the introduction

5 of gunpowder in the middle ages in Europe, as im portant

6 as atomic weapons in the last century. And that 's how

7 they characterize it. And what this is is the l eap

8 where we move from ordinance, from bullets, bomb s,

9 things that rip tissue and tear things up, to

10 electromagnetic weapon systems that keep sort of the

11 hardware intact, but debilitate the human operat or to

12 the point of being combat ineffective. Or conve rsely,

13 enhance the possibilities within our own combata nts

14 while degrading the abilities of others.

15 There's simple ways that you can achieve this.

16 You can introduce to the battlefield certain ele mental

17 compounds that in small background amounts would not be

18 considered dangerous. Let me give you iodine as an

19 example. We all need a certain amount of iodine in the

20 body to maintain thyroid function. But if you h ave too

21 much iodine, you'll get poisoned. You'll die. You'll

22 get sick.

23 So what can you do? You can send a signal in

24 that resonates the very same signal strength and

25 frequency as iodine, you can send that signal in and the

25






1 body will begin to react as if its gotten this m assive

2 load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodi ne

3 poisoning. You check the thyroid; check the blo od, it 's

4 not there. Mystery illness.

5 Something as simple as that for manipulating

6 large populations, not necessarily with their co nsent

7 and not necessarily with clear knowledge, and no thing

8 shows up in the background that would say why th is

9 poison actually exists that would account for th is. A

10 simple way.

11 One of the other ways that this technology can

12 be exploited is really quite simple. There was an

13 article produced by "Parameters", which is a mil itary

14 publication. "Parameters". You can look it up. It 's

15 the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you c an look

16 up the article name called, "The Mind has no Fir ewall".

17 It's a very important article. This article tal ked

18 about all the various ways in which you could in troduce

19 mind effects or mind control technologies using modern

20 technology today. And the original article was actually

21 written in a military journal called "Orienteer"

22 published in what is now Russia.

23 What's interesting about this is it said you

24 could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether i t be

25 radio, TV, the Internet, now cell phones; but,

26






1 essentially, any of these carriers, you can modu late a

2 signal on them that will manipulate behavior of segments

3 of the population.

4 And the Russians demonstrated this in a couple

5 of different ways. There was a program. It was called

6 "Undercurrents". It aired in the CBC, which is the

7 Canadian Public Broadcasting System. "Undercurr ents"

8 did two really interesting stories that I got to

9 participate in. One was on HAARP and the other was on

10 mind control. And on the mind control story tha t they

11 did -- this was a very popular program in Canada at the

12 time and this particular segment was their highe st rated

13 that they had ever run. And they had folks that came in

14 who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during

15 the Reagan Administration that couldn't talk abo ut what

16 they did in the White House, but they could talk about

17 what they observed in Russia.

18 And one of the things that they talked about

19 was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort

20 of, this white noise and on this white noise car ry a

21 signal. And so they put out this message, bring us

22 cake. And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat

23 these little cakes? I guess you do that in othe r parts

24 of Europe as well.

25 And so at the appointed time they began to

27






1 broadcast this. And workers from within that bu ilding

2 and on the street were bringing cake into the me eting

3 room without really knowing why they were doing it.

4 They just felt like doing it. Well, that was, i n fact,

5 what they were programmed to do.

6 Now, this goes back. We're talking about

7 15-year-old technology. And when you think abou t sort

8 of where did it go from there, in 2006, there we re a

9 couple contracts left by DARPA, which does resea rch for

10 the defense industry in the United States. And DARPA

11 used to be run by a guy named Tony Tether. Tony Tether

12 was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's.

13 Now, what they were doing then was, they had

14 left two contracts to the University of Californ ia for

15 what's called electronic telepathy. Okay. Elec tronic

16 telepathy. The idea of reading another person's mind at

17 a distance by analyzing the emanations coming fr om this

18 area, being able to analyze that and determine a nd

19 interpret what it is. And then the other half o f the

20 contract was to create complex signals to see if you

21 could transfer that array, so to speak, of signa ls into

22 another person's consciousness and whether they would

23 perceive the same images.

24 Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher

25 and her late husband, Bill Van Bise, in this ver y same

28






1 area. In fact, I have a copy of their unpublish ed paper

2 where they actually built an electronic circuit where

3 they could take a person in one room and a perso n in

4 another room, attach this person to that circuit and

5 this person to that circuit, and then, you know, the

6 psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares

7 and the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred

8 percent accurate with nine test subjects who had never

9 experienced consciously in any way any sense of

10 extrasensory perceptions or psychic perceptions. They

11 did it with hardware, transferring thoughts from one to

12 the other.

13 Now -- which tells me it's probably a little

14 more simple than what DARPA's doing. But when B en

15 Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doin g other

16 work for DARPA at the time and we had talked abo ut him

17 in our first publication, and then actually afte r

18 publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's a ttitude

19 was, you know, some things just shouldn't be don e. And

20 one of the things that he had been working on wa s

21 whether modification technologies, which he was at that

22 time and when we first met, making that technolo gy

23 available to the military. And after some dialo gue with

24 us and others, he decided there's certain techno logies

25 that are not safe in the hands of military.

29






1 At one point along the course I began doing

2 quite a bit of work on this whole mind effects i ssue.

3 And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy L ay.

4 Now, Dorothy is one of the heirs to the Lay, as in

5 Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation. So a very we althy

6 family. Dorothy was very interested in this tec hnology

7 specifically as it applied to victims.

8 And so she approached me at one point and asked

9 if I would become a member of her board of direc tors for

10 a non-profit that she was setting up to deal wit h these

11 kinds of technologies. And I've got to think ab out

12 whether I should tell you the rest of this story , and I

13 think I will, because why not?

14 So I have this thing, intuition. All of us

15 have it. I used to not pay as much attention to it as I

16 do today. When my intuition tells me something, I

17 listen, because when I really think about it, it 's never

18 been wrong. Neither has yours, if you really th ink

19 about it. Or maybe you don't think about it and just

20 start acting on it.

21 So my intuition said -- and this was a very

22 difficult time for me in 2002. In 2002, I had b een

23 betrayed by a very good friend, economically was

24 bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I s tarted

25 this work in '94. Economically was being crushe d. And

30






1 at that point I was deciding whether I was going to stay

2 in this work at all.

3 And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I

4 see this file and it's marked Lay. And I rememb er this

5 person had contacted us needing some information and we

6 provided it. And we never charge for that. I m ean, the

7 way we operated is, I sold books. And people li ke you

8 bought my books. And they allowed me to do this work.

9 I didn't write for grants where somebody could

10 manipulate me and control me and tell me what to say. I

11 didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit

12 out my work. I risked my own money. I publishe d my

13 book. And then I asked people to help me by sup porting

14 that work by buying that book. And I tell you, I made

15 two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and

16 a half million dollars over 20 years doing what I'm

17 doing right now.

18 A VOICE: Thank you.

19 (Applause.)

20 DR. BEGICH: And the whole idea was just to

21 educate. I didn't deal with victims. Okay. An d the

22 reason I didn't was because I felt that that was putting

23 the cart before the horse. We first need to edu cate

24 people that the technology is real, that this co uld

25 really happen to people and from that foundation , and

31






1 that became the foundation of my work in this.

2 So Dorothy calls me on the phone and she says,

3 will you be on my board? And I talked to her fo r about

4 an hour. At the end of the hour, I said, no, I can't be

5 on your board.

6 She said, well, why not?

7 I said, because my intuition is telling me I

8 really can't be on your board.

9 And she goes, well, I deserve more than that.

10 I said, okay. I don't know your board members,

11 I don't know who your board is, but something in here is

12 saying there's a problem there and I don't want to be

13 associated with them.

14 (Applause.)

15 DR. BEGICH: So it was a couple of months later

16 I got the call back. Because I told her also, I said,

17 you have millions. You have the ability. Go re search

18 what they say they're doing. Go see if it's rea lly

19 being done and find out for yourself. Do your d ue

20 diligence again.

21 And she did. A couple months later she came

22 back and she said, you were right. They were de frauding

23 me a number of ways. I've cleared out my board. It 's

24 just me now and my attorney. Will you be on my board?

25 Now, bear in mind, I'm in a pretty desperate

32






1 situation economically. At the time I have five

2 children at home. I've got people to take care of. I

3 have an economy that I've got to manage. And I tell

4 Dorothy, no, I can't be on your board.

5 She says, well, why not?

6 I said, well, I need to meet you first in

7 person, eyeball to eyeball. I said, we're going to talk

8 for three days. We're not going to talk about y our

9 foundation. I want to know everything I'm ever going to

10 read about you and your family in the newspaper. I want

11 you to have the same knowledge level of me. And I want

12 to know what your world view is before I join wi th you

13 in achieving that world view, because you have t he means

14 and I have the willingness if that world view is shared.

15 So we spent a few days. We decided that I

16 could do this. And for four years I worked with her.

17 And we put together, as her major effort was, a

18 conference on mind effects. But it wasn't open to the

19 public. It was closed to the public. And it wa s to

20 bring some key people together to have a convers ation

21 that would be open and free.

22 And one of those people I invited was Ben

23 Eastlund, who by then I'd gotten to know, had wa tched

24 what he had done in terms of his career. He was well

25 connected with DARPA at the time.

33






1 And I called him and I said, you know, Ben,

2 would you consider participating in this confere nce?

3 And he said, you know, if you had asked me this

4 seven or eight years ago, on a scale of one to t en, ten

5 being the relevance and importance of this, and one

6 being irrelevant and unimportant, I would have g iven

7 this a one or a two. He goes, but -- he goes, e very

8 time I talk to Tony Tether or others at DARPA, n obody's

9 laughing about mind control anymore and it's a n ine or a

10 ten and, yes, I' ll participate in your conferenc e.

11 The next person I asked was Garth Nicolson.

12 Does that name ring any bells for anybody? Okay . Garth

13 Nicolson was a full professor, I believe it was Texas

14 A&M. He taught medical students. He taught ove r a

15 thousand medical students. He was the guy that blew the

16 whistle on Gulf War Syndrome and testified in ou r

17 Congress six times before his wife was fired as a

18 molecular biologist from Texas A&M. And he was tenured;

19 they couldn't fire him. But they definitely har assed

20 him, because he was one of the first courageousl y enough

21 to step up to the plate and complain about what had been

22 happening in the Gulf War; we depleted uranium a nd some

23 of the other technologies that were being applie d there.

24 Well, the best thing that ever happened to him

25 was he got out of the university system. He for med a

34






1 nonprofit to deal with chronic disease. And he was

2 somebody that I watched maintain his course unde r really

3 difficult circumstances. So he was invited to t hat

4 conference.

5 I invited the daughter of my mentor, Raul

6 Makayla. She's an electrophysiologist. She ser ves on

7 one of the boards in Russia that regulates medic al

8 applications of lasers. She's an electrophysiol ogist.

9 Quite brill iant. We invited her.

10 We invited Rosalie Bertell. Does anyone

11 remember Rosalie Bertell? Okay. A few. Rosali e's

12 passed. Also deceased now. She was a mathemati cian,

13 physicist, biologist. She taught higher mathema tics to

14 doctoral students at Berkeley. She was also a n un.

15 It's kind of an odd combination. She was the le ad

16 statistician to go in to Bhopal for the World He alth

17 Organization after that huge chemical disaster. But she

18 was considered one of the top people in the worl d for

19 dealing with victims of radiological experiments ,

20 including electromagnetic radiation. She actual ly took

21 some of our work and added to it and published a book on

22 the HAARP system and its effect on human beings on this

23 sort of broad scale. So we had invited Rosalie, who had

24 been through some really difficult times as well , rose

25 out of her own ashes and maintained her ethical

35






1 platform.

2 The other person we invited was Alexander

3 Kaivarainen. Does anybody recognize that name? He was

4 the former head of the USSR Academy of Science

5 Biophysics Department for ten years. And this i s the

6 area that really gets into the meat of what we'r e

7 talking about here today. Now, what got -- Alex , I

8 believe, is deceased now also. You know, all th ese

9 guys, you know, they're a lot older than me and they

10 keep dying of old age. But Alex got his stimula tion in

11 science at a young age watching a demonstration of the

12 paranormal, ESP, telepathy, these kinds of thing s in

13 Russia when he was a teenager. And it just real ly

14 caught his interest.

15 When I met Alex, he was in his 60s and he was

16 the brightest top five physicists on the planet,

17 recognized by institutions around the world. An d what

18 he had determined is that there were rational re asons

19 for why these things manifested. So he was invi ted to

20 this conference and actually presented a paper g iving

21 the mathematics and the physics that lends itsel f to

22 these extrasensory possibilities, these things t hat the

23 military now calls anomalous human capabilities. We

24 used to call it extrasensory perception or ESP, but now

25 they give it a new name because there's a lot of

36






1 connotations with that that kind of get you disc redited

2 in certain segments of the scientific community.

3 So I want to talk -- roll back again a little

4 bit -- I want to talk about binaural beat, which I had

5 mentioned earlier in this presentation. And I j ump

6 around a little bit. It 's kind of my style. I used to

7 not even use these things, but I think people fe el more

8 comfortable using them.

9 The binaural beat. We can't hear these really,

10 really low frequency signals, because the human ear

11 doesn't quite work that way. Below a certain fr equency,

12 the human ear won't hear.

13 Now, a gentleman by the name of Robert Monroe

14 developed a method using binaural beat where you could

15 send in a signal within the range of human heari ng, say,

16 at 15,000 Hertz or pulses per second or cycles p er

17 second, coming in one ear at, say, 15,000, anoth er

18 signal coming in the other ear at, say, 15,007. Within

19 the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a

20 beat frequency of seven, the difference between the two.

21 15,000, 15,007. The beat frequency becomes seve n Hertz,

22 seven pulses per second, which happens to be in the

23 upper Theta range, and this is where the brain t hen

24 drives to.

25 At the same time that that occurs, you get a

37






1 hemispheric balance, a distribution of energy ac ross

2 both hemispheres of the brain, the analytical si de and

3 the creative side and working together. This is

4 actually how human beings are supposed to functi on.

5 This is how young children predominantly functio n, with

6 more of a balance between the hemispheres, where the

7 energy is more balanced. And then we educate th em.

8 And with young girls, who we say are more

9 intuitive and have this other operation of the b rain,

10 and young boys are more analytical, and now we k ind of

11 treat everybody the same so we kind of dumb them all

12 down to the same level. But when you look at yo ung

13 children and you look at where their brain activ ity is

14 and between 3 and, say, 5 or 6 years old, they h ave

15 this predominant brain frequencies or a lot of T heta

16 brain frequencies coming in and then some ELF an d then

17 higher frequency ranges.

18 Now, what is Theta? Theta states if we're in a

19 Theta state, we're kind of like in that dream-li ke state

20 between awake and asleep where you're consciousl y aware

21 of your dreams. That's where 3 to 5 year olds s pend a

22 good deal of their time. That's why their imagi nations,

23 as we call it, are so active. And we keep sayin g, oh,

24 don't pay attention to that, don't pay attention to

25 that. This was our first attempt to shut down t he

38






1 intuitive combinations of the way the brain is a ctually

2 supposed to work.

3 In fact, for those who have a Christian

4 background, you know Jesus Christ himself said, look at

5 the little children, watch what they do. You kn ow, I

6 think I heard somebody say something about this earlier,

7 little children come to the table kind of innoce nt with

8 a view of the world that's quite different than the rest

9 of ours. But the brain activity of children is unique

10 and we begin to take that out of them in the str ucture

11 of the way we educate.

12 So what Robert Monroe -- he was actually a

13 radio engineer. He owned a bunch of radio stati ons. He

14 had this really weird experience. It 's an OBE, an outer

15 body experience, that he had that kind of threw him.

16 You know, it didn't make any sense to him. So h e

17 began -- he also noticed that in the background there

18 was this kind of noise that he perceived.

19 So he began to experiment and he created this

20 technique for binaural beat. He developed a who le

21 series. In fact, he actually got US patents on a

22 binaural beat. This is an image taken out of on e of

23 those US patents from 1994, and this is showing the

24 brain before the activity, before turning on the

25 Hemi-Sync, and this is after, showing a more eve n

39






1 distribution in a more rhythmic pattern in the

2 brainwaves as you see in the upper right-hand co rner.

3 Let me roll back again so you can kind of see

4 the comparison. Normal brain, kind of disorgani zed

5 activities happening all through the brain, and then a

6 coherent signal creating a hemispheric balance a nd an

7 optimization of brain potential.

8 So what did he do with this? He developed a

9 whole series of things; audio input technology,

10 essentially, to manipulate behavior, but where y ou're in

11 control of that manipulation. So you want to qu it

12 smoking, you get his CD on quit smoking. It aff ects the

13 brain in such a way, becomes compelling, very af fective.

14 Sleep disorders can be addressed in this way.

15 They have someone be able to relax, meditation,

16 concentration, accelerated learning. A whole ar ray of

17 things can be done. And they did this by workin g with,

18 over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now

19 his daughter doing the work of working with thou sands of

20 people to determine which signals actually creat ed which

21 effects and then developing technology that they could

22 place in the hands of individuals to make the ch oice on

23 how to use it.

24 Now, that's kind of an interesting way of

25 looking at technology. It was my area of intere st, in

40






1 the beginning of all of this work, was not looki ng for

2 the dark side of all of this, but in the mid-'80 s I got

3 very interested in light and sound stimulation o f the

4 brain that capitalized on sound signals and flic kering

5 light for brain entrainment. Entrain the brain where

6 the brain will follow that external signal or wh at's

7 called FFR, frequency following response. So ve ry

8 little energy.

9 Let me roll back to Delgado again.

10 One-fiftieth of the amount of energy the earth c reates

11 is sufficient to move your brain into very speci fic

12 states. Dialing that radio up, if you will. Th is is

13 just another technique for altering brain activi ty that

14 might be beneficial, but you're in control of it , not

15 somebody else.

16 I'm going to skip some of these just because

17 they're not so relevant. And I'm going to close the

18 images and let me just go back into the whole di alogue

19 of this, mind effects.

20 When I think about sort of where do we go with

21 this conference, when we put that conference tog ether

22 with the Lay Institute, our purpose was to put t ogether

23 these really good thinkers to try and see if we could

24 create a synergy between them.

25 And when I first got interested in doing

41






1 something actively in science, it wasn't about H AARP and

2 it wasn't about mind control. The role that I t hought I

3 would play -- and I was working in a government office

4 at the time, and it was -- my friend said, you m ake your

5 living with your left foot. Because I could mak e my

6 living, but the rest of my creativity could be e ngaged

7 elsewhere and me working in bureaucracy was real ly a bad

8 match.

9 But the point was, my youngest son, when I was

10 getting really frustrated with my work, said, ch ange

11 channels.

12 You know, I'm thinking about this, because I

13 had just given him this discussion about creativ ity was

14 like changing the channels on the TV set, right, and so

15 he's feeding it back, time to change the channel s, Dad.

16 So I thought about it. And what I decided I

17 would do is -- I read independently in science o ver 20

18 years. I had read some really compelling things from,

19 say, one guy in one branch of science. I though t, boy,

20 if this person could ever meet that person, you could

21 really see something happen.

22 And the first paper I actually ever presented

23 in science, I was 19 and it was at another obscu re

24 conference that I ended up in on biorhythm resea rch.

25 And my paper was contrasting at that time the So viet

42






1 method of research versus the US method. Now, t he US

2 method was compartmentalization, separate. You know,

3 distill things down to the smallest subspecialty and

4 then push these people into a corner and let the m do

5 this bit of the research. And then you've got n ine

6 other people over here and ten other groups over there

7 and fifteen groups over there, and somewhere all of this

8 stuff comes together and it gets really sloppy. Okay.

9 It's sloppy because there's a lot of repetition; it 's

10 very expensive.

11 Now, the Russians, Soviets at the time, they

12 didn't have the money for that kind of research, to

13 spread it out that way, and they used a very dif ferent

14 method. They took experts from all of these dif ferent

15 fields, even though they didn't seem like they s hould

16 connect. They put them in the same room to work

17 together to develop science. That's why when yo u look

18 at the exposures that we had seen earlier, what are the

19 regulatory exposures of electromagnetic fields, the

20 Russians in the '90s and the '80s were a thousan d times

21 more stringent than they were in the US.

22 Well, why was it? Because they had actually

23 made the observations that we hadn't made and ac tually

24 connected the dots in a way to say, hey, this is

25 dangerous. That doesn't mean they followed thei r own

43






1 regulations, because they probably didn't. They did

2 whatever was expeditious there. But at least th ey

3 recognized the physiological responses to

4 electromagnetic fields and the fact that you cou ld

5 manipulate it.

6 What was discovered by a guy named Allan Frey,

7 he was looking at microwaves, and he discovered that

8 there's this flickering effect, but it only occu rred

9 when you pulse-modulated the signal. And if you look

10 at -- I heard earlier, it's always scalars. It' s always

11 scalars. It's not vectors. It's not electromag netic

12 fields as we think about them.

13 But if you look at the ones that affect human

14 psychology and physiology, if you look at those signals,

15 they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.

16 They're like the punch, like punching that ionos phere to

17 create the ELF. It's like those signals. Those

18 modulations on these other carriers are meant to trigger

19 that effect by you entraining to that pulse, tha t

20 firing, or some submodulation being carried on a general

21 carrier.

22 Now, if you remember the first Gulf War, the

23 first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi A rmy just

24 sort of gave up. The fourth largest Army in the world

25 just like school children on their first fire dr ill

44






1 throwing their hands up and surrendering, you kn ow,

2 thousands of guys to a few dozen. What was that about?

3 Now, I speculated on this. And then it was

4 Scottish media that later reported on this and s aid it

5 was Project Solo, which was a project operated b y the

6 United States. And what we did is we had this C -130

7 flying over the country at the time and it was t aking

8 and piggybacking the signal on the radio broadca st going

9 into the region that were broadcasting the Musli m music

10 and prayers.

11 So all these guys are in their bunkers

12 listening to their favorite radio station. Unbe knownst

13 to them, the subsignals being played on that bro adcast

14 created anxiety, high levels of anxiety and fear . And

15 then you watched this Army just collapse under t his.

16 And that was kind of the -- in my view, the

17 first test of could you really do this, could yo u do it

18 in this adversarial environment.

19 And one of my friends joked, hey, it 's the

20 perfect Republican weapon, right? You can keep all the

21 hardware in place, but totally wipe out the popu lation.

22 Zbigniew Brzezinski said, in between two ways,

23 it doesn't matter if it 's Republicans or Conserv atives.

24 They just use different rationale for accomplish ing

25 their political ends. On the conservative side, the

45






1 Neocon side, it might be the fascination with ga dgetry

2 and new technology, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said, and on

3 the liberal side it might be the idea that we're doing

4 this for your own good. The government is here, right?

5 And we've all heard that before.

6 The fact of the matter is, when you start

7 thinking about mind control technologies as a co ncept,

8 the idea that someone believes that they can int erfere

9 with your free will, this is something that most

10 religions in the world say God won't even do. Y et, men

11 think this is their appropriate direction in tec hnology,

12 to interfere with the way consciousness flows.

13 Now, think about for a moment what are the

14 things that -- what is the easiest way to manipu late

15 consciousness? The easiest way, the simplest wa y.

16 Create an environment of anxiety and fear. Beca use what

17 happens at that point is you cannot reach your h igher

18 states of consciousness.

19 If you look at Monroe, rhythmic patterns in the

20 Hemi-Sync as an example, higher states of consci ousness

21 are associated with those rhythmic patterns with in the

22 brain; not that incoherent scattering of death a nd

23 information and energy.

24 So if you create a certain environment of fear

25 and anxiety and you look at an EEG monitor and t he brain

46






1 activity of an individual, you see it's kind of

2 scattered in patterns. One person is experienci ng

3 higher emotions; love, compassion. You begin to see

4 rhythmic patterns.

5 Another simple way of seeing is something that

6 you can actually measure. Take two people that are in

7 love and they -- you know the saying, and I look ed into

8 her eyes, right? If you actually gaze into the eyes of

9 another individual and hold that gaze, you'll be gin to

10 mirror each other's brain activity in a pretty u nique

11 way. Your breathing will even synchronize if yo u do it

12 long enough. Two people's breathing begins to

13 synchronize. Their energy fields begin to synch ronize.

14 And at the same time, their awareness, their

15 intuitions elevate and their rhythmic patterns i n the

16 brain can be seen. If you can create an environ ment of

17 fear -- think about the advertising you see on

18 television. It 's all about how you smell, how y our

19 breath is, you know? It's all these things to m ake you

20 uncomfortable.

21 Think about the 6:00 news. Now, we heard

22 someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that ki nd of

23 works. You come home from a hard day at work. Most

24 people sit down in front of the television set. They're

25 already fatigued. They begin to watch the telev ision.

47






1 And then their spouse hollers, it's time for din ner;

2 it's time for dinner. How many of you've been t here,

3 right? Nobody's listening. No one's hearing. Because

4 they're in a light trance-like state.

5 Now, if you look in a dark room -- the

6 television is here -- look behind you at the whi te wall

7 and look at the flicker rate. If that flicker r ate is a

8 coherent signal within a certain range through t he optic

9 nerves, your brain will lock onto that signal. If you

10 monitor the brain activity at that time, you'll drop

11 into this highly-suggestive state and now you li sten to

12 the advertising.

13 Now, every school of psychology teaches

14 frequency following response today and that you can

15 create these kinds of effects. Would they apply in

16 advertising? Of course they would. That's why

17 advertising works so well. It works because it' s

18 convincing and compelling.

19 When you look at the 6:00 news, would somebody

20 utilize that in broadcasting the news of the lat est

21 propaganda from whatever source it's coming from ? I

22 would speculate -- today I would speculate and s ay yes.

23 When you think about how simple it is to create

24 that agitation. There was a person at Valencia

25 University who published a paper in 1995 talking about

48






1 this whole concept. And what he said back then was you

2 could create a complex signal, broadcast it out over a

3 large area that just created the sense that some thing's

4 not right. Unease.

5 And then you go watch the 6:00 news and they

6 indict some specific ethnic group, maybe it's Mu slims,

7 and then a certain amount of that anger gets div erted

8 that way. Well, in a day where a lot of things are

9 decided on the laser edge of populations, on maj orities,

10 this is a very, very powerful tool and one quite simple

11 tool to apply in the modern world.

12 When you think about news feeds today, how much

13 is really investigative reporting and how much o f it is

14 just spitting out somebody's press release, righ t? Very

15 little investigative reporting today because it' s

16 expensive, because it's not immediate, and when you look

17 at the news media today, it 's almost immediate a nd most

18 of it is just meant to entertain. It 's not mean t to

19 inform.

20 You know, freedom of the press, it used to have

21 something to do with keeping an informed public so we

22 could make good decisions and we could govern as a

23 public. Today we debate the media as freedom of speech.

24 Say whatever you want, say it however you want, but

25 nobody takes responsibility and we have the neut ered

49






1 neutral news. And if you really believe it's ne utral,

2 come on.

3 Everybody who assigns a story to a reporter

4 knows that reporter's biased. The editors have bias.

5 It comes out in the news and what gets published and

6 what doesn't. How many stories about mind contr ol hit

7 the news? Occasionally. The economists might p ick it

8 up. Somebody might pick up a little bit, a piec e of it.

9 But no one has really taken it on as a topic and

10 consistently pursued it.

11 Yet, when you think about modern technology and

12 the resolution -- now, we've been talking about things

13 that have happened in the past, and somebody eve n

14 mentioned this, MK-ULTRA is a program -- you've heard it

15 alluded to. That was the CIA's program. It had 144

16 subprojects under it.

17 Most of the records surrounding that were

18 shredded by a guy named Gottlieb, who was respon sible

19 for that at the Central Intelligence Agency duri ng the

20 Church Committee hearings. We never really got the

21 truth back then. But the resolution, the abilit y to do

22 this, has become increasingly refined as our tec hnology

23 has advanced.

24 When you think about technological advances,

25 one of the things I read says that technology fr om the

50






1 invention of the wheel to where we are today, it doubles

2 about every nine to ten months. Wow. Think abo ut it.

3 Invention of the wheel to where we are today, te n months

4 from now we're going to double that, and then we 're

5 going to keep doing that.

6 It used to be every five years in the 1980s,

7 and it kept shrinking as our computing power inc reased

8 and our ability to manipulate large amounts of d ata

9 increased.

10 Now, a super computer, think about a super

11 computer. A super computer will do somewhere, w hen I

12 was doing this work, about 280 teraflops a secon d, which

13 at that time would be like six bill ion people on the

14 planet with hand calculators doing a calculation every

15 60 seconds for 60 hours to do what that super co mputer

16 could do in a second.

17 Well, the next evolution -- some think it's

18 already here -- are the quantum computers. What will

19 the quantum computer do? A quantum computer in one hour

20 will do what a super computer does in a trill ion years.

21 It's back to this analogy of how much EMF do we have out

22 there.

23 Well, think about the same kind of

24 amplification and computing power. You look at privacy

25 as a concept. It doesn't exist in the world tod ay,

51






1 right? Virtually everything about us is catalog ued,

2 tracked, whether it 's your GPS on your phone, wh ether

3 it's your phone conversations -- in the United S tates,

4 every piece of mail is photographed for who it w ent to

5 and who sent it.

6 When you think about your telecommunications,

7 your Internet connections, Google, AT&T, Verizon , all of

8 them have violated the very essence of what pers onal

9 privacy is all about.

10 Because today, in the 21st Century, we need a

11 revolution, an evolution of what privacy is all about.

12 Because you, experiencing the victimization of t his

13 technology, are the pinnacle of the abuse. But everyone

14 is subject to abuse of personal privacy.

15 You used to think about it, it would start and

16 end in our physical doorway in our home. It has nothing

17 in your home compared to what is in data banks s tored on

18 every single human being in this room.

19 Now, people say, oh, don't worry about it. We

20 don't have the ability to collect. We don't hav e the

21 resolution to look into it. Quantum computers w ill give

22 that resolution. Whichever government finds qua ntum

23 computing first will be able to hack through eve ry

24 security code for every system on the planet wit hin

25 hours. They'll be able to predict with so much accuracy

52






1 by collecting all that data and analyzing that d ata, it

2 will almost seem a spiritual event.

3 But it will only be accurate up to a certain

4 point. And then there will be a little bit of a flaw.

5 And over time that flaw will amplify to where it 's big

6 flaws. But we'll rely increasingly on these sys tems to

7 guide our world, to guide our ideas, our philoso phy, and

8 how we pursue the world.

9 The Internet. What people think about that is

10 the world wide mind of the 21st Century. PBS, o ur

11 Public Broadcasting System, did a special called "The

12 World Wide Mind". And they say within 100 years -- and

13 I say within 20 years or even now -- maybe it al ready

14 exists now -- but within 20 years that you'll be able to

15 connect the physical minds of all of the people on the

16 planet in a world wide mind.

17 Now, that might appeal to some. It doesn't

18 really appeal to me from the standpoint of techn ology.

19 I think we already have that on a certain level. I

20 think we already are connected on a certain leve l. Our

21 belief systems limit our ability to access that level,

22 but I believe it's here.

23 And I've seen enough demonstrations of it. You

24 know, all those scientists I had in that room fo r that

25 mind effects conference, the part that really bl ew me

53






1 away that I didn't expect was what they really c entered

2 on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun

3 and physicist, and she said that the next leap i s going

4 to be the leap where we realize or we recognize or we

5 remember our extrasensory perceptions, our anony mous

6 capabilities as human beings and that becomes th e next

7 evolution of the human kind.

8 And what suppresses that is fear and anxiety,

9 because you cannot reach those cases of consciou sness as

10 long as you're in fear and anxiety. And anyone who

11 purports or is a victim of these technologies, d o you

12 have anxiety, do you have fear? Of course you d o. Do

13 you have the ability to reach those higher state s of

14 consciousness in that condition? It's physiolog ically

15 not possible.

16 So when you think about entire populations,

17 whether it 's religion injecting fear or whether it's

18 government injecting fear or as my friend used t o say,

19 you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps

20 you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you th ink

21 about how things evolved in Europe several hundr ed years

22 ago.

23 When you think about modern technology on the

24 backdrop of that concept, what's changed? Nothi ng's

25 changed. It's just the same deal. You know, 6, 000 wars

54






1 in 4,000 years, most of them over religion; let me give

2 you a clue, God doesn't need any help killing an ybody.

3 God can probably do it himself or herself.

4 The fact of the matter is, the idea that people

5 would just be evil on -- and I think I heard ear lier

6 today that the psychopaths are in the minority. I

7 believe they are. I think really evil-to-the-co re

8 people, they're out there, but they're not this mass.

9 Most people do things because they believe they' re

10 right, and then they want to impose their rightn ess on

11 other people.

12 And this is kind of a mistake and then we end

13 up in this conflict between ideas without being fair and

14 recognizing people's right to disagree. And I h eard it

15 said earlier, certain things you can't say in Ge rmany.

16 Certain things you can't say in a movie theater, too.

17 You know, you can't yell fire. Now, it makes go od

18 sense. You don't want to yell fire in a movie t heater.

19 Some would say what we're doing here is yelling

20 fire in a movie theater because we're letting pe ople

21 know what we know, what we've concluded from a g ood deal

22 of research.

23 You know, my books are written, every page at

24 the bottom of each page are the footnotes. Some of you

25 find that distracting. Personally, I want to kn ow where

55






1 the information came from as I'm reading it, not a week

2 later as I'm contemplating it. I want to know t he

3 source.

4 And so in the publications that I've written,

5 1600 source documents, reviews out of a matrix o f a

6 hundred thousand that we had available to us, mo re or

7 less. 20,000 have made it into my archives and 1600

8 have made it into four books on technology deali ng with

9 mind effects, dealing with HAARP, dealing with p ersonal

10 privacy issues. A lot of the things go unreleas ed in

11 the last four years.

12 You can look at my publications from 1999 and

13 2000, and you'll see the same things, because th e old

14 literature showed enough to come to those conclu sions.

15 When I testified in the European Parliament in

16 the '90s, at their invitation -- and this was an other --

17 a good side story for technology. A gentleman b y the

18 name of Thomas Spencer, he was from the UK, he w as a

19 Parliamentarian at the time, and he was the Chai rman of

20 the Environmental Subcommittee of the European

21 Parliament. And he had contacted me. Somebody had

22 given him the book on HAARP and he was very inte rested

23 in this. So we had a conversation. And at my e xpense,

24 I flew to Brussels and spent a few days with him talking

25 about the issue and brought with me a couple fee t of

56






1 unclassified documents for his research team to take a

2 look at.

3 What happened then is he moved in the European

4 Parliament -- he was a Conservative, by the way, and he

5 moved into a Foreign Affairs Chairman, a very po werful

6 position, an ideal position for dealing with the things

7 that we were dealing with at the time.

8 So we -- at his invitation, I came over to

9 testify in front of the group on security and

10 disarmament in the European Parliament on HAARP and on

11 non-lethal weapons, the kinds of things we've be en

12 talking about today, the manipulation of human b eings.

13 Now, they do it a lot differently than we do it

14 in the US. In the US, when you have public hear ings,

15 the public actually gets to come. In the Europe an

16 Parliament, the public meeting is you have to ha ve an

17 invitation to come. So that's kind of different . You

18 know, I hadn't really thought much about that.

19 And they also -- they can also do things behind

20 closed doors, which, you know, we theoretically can't do

21 in the United States. You can't have a meeting without

22 the public invited or the media invited.

23 So what happened the night before the hearing

24 is the Committee met with myself, one of the oth er

25 people testifying, and a member of the press and we

57






1 spent five and a half hours in a non-official me eting to

2 talk about these issues, so that when we actuall y gave

3 our testimony the following day, they would have

4 formulated a set of questions to give us the opp ortunity

5 to follow along. So it was a great way to do it ,

6 because then they at least had a good base of kn owledge.

7 Now, in that private meeting we demonstrated a

8 technology using infrasound where you could tran sfer

9 sound through electrodes attached to the skin wh ere you

10 would perceive that proverbial voice in the head . We

11 demonstrated that to the Parliamentarians in tha t closed

12 session.

13 And then we went into the hearing the following

14 day. And it was Rosalie Bertell, which is where I met

15 her, testifying on our side. It was -- I can't remember

16 the gentleman's name, but he was from a group ca lled

17 GRIP in Brussels that does research on weapon sy stems

18 particularly and he had done his Master's thesis on

19 HAARP, and so he was there.

20 We had someone from the International Red Cross

21 that had done work on non-lethal weapons and was a

22 specialist in this particular area. And then I was

23 there.

24 We each got 15 minutes to present. And then I

25 got an hour of questions from the committee in t he open

58






1 hearing where I had the opportunity to talk abou t some

2 of these things. And right around that time the re had

3 been this incident in Japan where children watch ing a

4 cartoon that had a certain flicker rate had caus ed over

5 700 children to go to the hospital with epilepti c

6 seizures. Now, remember, non-ionizing radiation is not

7 a problem, right? A flicker of the TV caused 70 0 kids

8 to go into the hospital.

9 Now, some say that was by design. Some say

10 that was by accident. But it was a perfect il lu stration

11 for talking about non-ionizing radiation in the European

12 Parliament because they had all read that story. It was

13 fresh.

14 The other thing demonstrating infrasound,

15 something that had never been demonstrated, to m y

16 knowledge, in that type of a meeting, to show th at you

17 could actually transfer sound without necessaril y

18 involving the ears.

19 Now, there's another technology that was

20 advanced by a guy named Woody Norris -- he won t he

21 Lemelson Prize at MIT for this particular techno logy,

22 and I believe the year was 2004. You can look u p Woody

23 Norris -- and his was using acoustic heterodyne where he

24 could send in two signals from two different sou rces,

25 point them at an individual in the crowd, and th ey would

59






1 hear this voice in their head and nobody else wo uld hear

2 it.

3 Well, he won a half a million dollars for that

4 prize, organized a company called ATCO. You can look

5 them up. They're a public company. And he sold that

6 technology to the military for perimeter protect ion.

7 You know, where they could have these sort of al arm

8 systems so when the protestors got too close the y'd hear

9 these warning signs that nobody else was hearing .

10 Now, you think about that for a moment.

11 Imagine -- this is why the European Parliament g ot

12 interested, because we used this il lustration. Now,

13 imagine a national leader standing up in front o f a

14 group and all of a sudden they hear voices in th eir head

15 that nobody else hears. That's the end of that guy,

16 right? I mean, he's out of there. And that's e xactly

17 what that technology can do. And that was one

18 demonstration.

19 Now, some have said that you can pulse modulate

20 on a single beam and create the same effect or u tilize

21 something like HAARP, not so much for voice in t he head,

22 but for certainly changing emotional state of la rge

23 segments of the population.

24 When we looked at all of this, we even looked

25 back -- you know, where else could this have bee n used?

60






1 And there was a device in Vietnam called the Lid a

2 machine, L-i-d-a. A guy who researched this was a guy

3 named Ross Adey, who is, unfortunately, also dec eased.

4 Ross Adey was brill iant and was utilized by the

5 government, by private sector as an expert in th ese

6 kinds of areas.

7 Well, he was asked to look at -- this

8 particular device had been captured during the V ietnam

9 War. It was a Russian device. And it created t he

10 entrainment effect using flickering light and so und.

11 And they used it for interrogating prisoners by putting

12 them into that, like, trance-like state and then

13 extracting intelligence from them. Now, that's the

14 1960s. Again, this is low resolution, low techn ology.

15 As computing powers increased, as our knowledge

16 in human physiology has increased, as our knowle dge of

17 the electromagnetic nature of human beings has

18 increased, the ability to manipulate large segme nts of

19 the population comes easily achieved, either as a side

20 effect or unfortunate disaster of our technology .

21 You mentioned Swiss Re, Swiss Re Insurance.

22 Swiss Re Insurance wrote a paper on Electrosmog. I

23 believe it was 2002. And they said to the insur ance

24 industry then, don't insure electromagnetic fiel d

25 effects because it will result in a bigger lawsu it than

61






1 Firestone on their tires or the smoking industry ,

2 because the knowledge is here and now and nobody insures

3 that risk.

4 Lloyd's of London insures anything, but they

5 won't insure that risk. Nobody does. Because i nsurance

6 companies don't like to lose money. It's as sim ple as

7 that. And yet the telecom industry on cell phon es --

8 before cell phones were invented, the University of

9 Washington had investigated those very same freq uencies

10 on chick embryo studies and determined they were

11 harmful. Cell phones didn't exist then.

12 Then cell phones come out and everything's safe

13 all of a sudden. That same guy that did that re search

14 says, now, wait a minute, we did all this resear ch.

15 This is a dangerous thing. But the telecom indu stry is

16 a powerful adversary.

17 So it went to the Congress. You remember this.

18 There was a guy in Florida. Brain cancer. Big

19 controversy. It ended up in the Congress. Cong ress

20 said, we need a study. So the industry says, oh , we'll

21 pay for the study. They spend 25 million dollar s on the

22 study.

23 I can't remember the guy's name who did it, but

24 he eventually published a book because his findi ngs

25 were, hey, this is dangerous. All right. He is sues his

62






1 report. They figured, hey, they got him. You k now,

2 they got the 25 million into his queue. He got to spend

3 it all on these projects. He got to make some m oney

4 himself. Hey, he's our man.

5 Well, he wasn't. This guy actually had some

6 integrity, and I apologize for not recalling his name.

7 A VOICE: George Carlo.

8 DR. BEGICH: Which one is it?

9 A VOICE: George Carlo.

10 DR. BEGICH: George Carlo, that's correct. And

11 he wrote a book called, "Cell Phones", a very im portant

12 book.

13 And when it comes to children, one of his

14 observations was -- he had the simple observatio n of

15 damage to skulls. You know, you have a four-yea r-old, a

16 five-year-old, 400 percent more energy transfers to the

17 skull into the brain than an adult. Ten-year-ol d,

18 twelve-year-old, approximately 200 percent.

19 This is one of the main reasons why you don't

20 want children using cell phones or, even worse, the

21 portable phone in the home because it's even les s

22 efficient with the battery and the energy with e ven more

23 leakage. And what do we do? Try and find a har d line

24 phone today where you actually pick it up and ta lk into

25 it. You can't even find them anymore. They're almost

63






1 impossible to find.

2 When you look at what we have learned about

3 human physiology and the effects of electromagne tic

4 fields on the human physiology, it is the revolu tion in

5 science that will collapse the pharmacuetical in dustry

6 one day. And one day we're going to wake up and

7 recognize that the pea in the soup of electromag netic

8 radiation has been the cause and the root to mos t of the

9 chronic disease we see on the planet today.

10 When you combine that with that concept that I

11 used, that example of iodine, everyone has a lit tle bit,

12 now you have these complex interactions, 5,000 n ew

13 chemicals are introduced or compounds introduced to the

14 public every year without really any serious stu dies,

15 and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a

16 very toxic world. And then you take the technol ogy of

17 manipulation from the propaganda of World War II to the

18 downloading of that. What does the military hop e to

19 achieve? They want to be able to train military

20 personnel with a download. Blap. There's your 12

21 years' worth of education. Now, let's go on.

22 And now here's the thing. Think about that

23 kind of education. No critical thinking involve d. Just

24 programming. It 's like writing to a disk. No c ritical

25 thinking involved. Who controls that? Curricul um

64






1 controls the way in which our society goes. Thi s is the

2 risk.

3 What about evidence in courtrooms when you can

4 create a synthetic memory or wipe one out? What does

5 that do to a Democratic Republic or a Democracy where

6 people have the power? That power has been take n from

7 us as we become increasingly transparent to gove rnmental

8 agencies and they become increasingly opaque.

9 It is the opposite of what should be occurring.

10 There shouldn't be a camera in every household. There

11 should be a camera in every government office. Because

12 the technology's there. We should be able to di al in

13 and look at what our employees are doing, right?

14 Wouldn't you like to be able to dial up your

15 Congressional office and see that conversation t hey're

16 having in real time? And why shouldn't we be ab le to do

17 that? What do they have to hide?

18 You know, you think about government and you

19 start saying that and, you know, the only people

20 protected from that kind of intrusion in the US are

21 federal employees. They have a higher level of

22 protection than the average citizen within the c ountry

23 that I live in. For what?

24 And when you think about government, everyone

25 points to the politician. I can tell you, most

65






1 politicians are ignorant. In fact, most politic al

2 parties in the United States the preference is t o have

3 people that are -- they look like the news annou ncer,

4 but they couldn't think their way out of a phone booth,

5 right? We don't even have a phone booth anymore , but

6 they couldn't think their way out of one. Becau se they

7 want people that are smart enough to look good, but not

8 smart enough to think on their own. That's the ideal

9 politician for political parties, because they c an be

10 told what to do.

11 Look at how much money is being spent in

12 political outcomes. Huge amounts of money. Som e people

13 have pointed and looked at, like, Australia to m andatory

14 voting. Everybody votes now.

15 Worst possible thing that you could ever do.

16 And here's why: When the population doesn't vot e, who

17 pulls the lever? Those that are informed, right ? So

18 maybe 20 percent of the population votes, but at least

19 they're informed. They've educated themselves.

20 If you force people to vote to keep their

21 driver's license, their medical benefits, or wha tever

22 social programs you've got running and you say, you will

23 vote, now who decides what they vote on? Whoeve r can

24 buy the 30-second or one-minute ad on TV that in fluences

25 them. The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,

66






1 and pull the lever. Now we have a dangerous sit uation.

2 A very dangerous situation.

3 Democracy is something that each of us have to

4 claim internally. The change that people are lo oking

5 for in this group happens by a change in conscio usness,

6 by us recognizing what we are as human beings,

7 recognizing the potential that we have. Because you

8 know what these government programs yielded? Ev erybody

9 points to the fear side of the equation. But wh at they

10 really discovered was that every single soul, ev ery

11 human being has this anomalous capability.

12 Now, imagine if we could awaken those

13 capabilities, could you hide anything? I mean, if

14 people could literally look into the mind of ano ther

15 person, that makes a politician pretty vulnerabl e,

16 wouldn't it?

17 That is the next evolution that I believe is

18 happening and it's the only evolution, the only

19 revolution that can change the way things are. It

20 starts with human consciousness. It starts with what we

21 believe to be right and true and beginning to ac t on it.

22 Not from a foundation of fear, but a foundation of

23 confidence.

24 You know, somebody asked me once, what do you

25 think about faith? I said, faith is what you kn ow to be

67






1 right and true and you step into it on the idea that you

2 can achieve it. You believe it.

3 So many people I've seen in this work, they

4 keep jumping into things beyond their belief. T hey

5 don't believe they can achieve it. They try it anyway

6 and they fail, and they keep failing. And peopl e who

7 are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can

8 do with confidence, do what you can do with know ledge,

9 don't wait for a group to form. The group's alr eady

10 here. It's called the human race. Act on what you know

11 to be right and true. If you make a mistake, cl ean it

12 up, learn from it, and move forward.

13 When you look across this room and you look at

14 all these folks with a little bit of gray hair, and

15 you've got the gray hair not by all of those gre at

16 things that happened in your life, but by the re al

17 disasters that happened in your life. You know, you

18 think about bad news is a stimulation for good n ews.

19 People ask me, you know your father's

20 disappearance, disappeared off the face of the e arth,

21 that must have been a horrible thing. Yeah, it was at

22 the time. I consider it the most important even t in my

23 life because it altered my course.

24 The worst things in our lives alter our course,

25 change our direction, activate that higher poten tial

68






1 that cause us to rise out of the ashes of our ap athy and

2 our defeats and stand on our feet again and move

3 forward.

4 The pain that people experience today is the

5 catalyst for the solutions tomorrow, whether we like it

6 or not, whether it 's falling down as a two-year- old or

7 standing up as an adult. If we stand up on the basis of

8 our ethics, on the basis of our values, and we

9 reinvigorate and let go of the fear and recogniz e what

10 we are as creative beings, we have the potential to make

11 change.

12 And with that, I' l l open it to questions.

13 (Applause.)

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24 24

25

69







Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,®

Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

[email protected]

717-669-2163

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________________________________________:

Stanley J. Caterbone :Advanced Media Group : CIVIL DIVISION Petitioner : Case No. 15-03984

Related Case: PennsylvaniaSuperior 1915 MDA 2015

:v. :

Lancaster County Crisis Intervention :Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District AttorneyDetective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City PoliceLancaster City Police DepartmentDr. Silvia Gratz, Chief Medical Officer andFairmount Behavioral Health System :

Defendants :

EXHIBIT re “CORROBORATING EXPERT AND FORMER NSA WHISTLEBLOWER KARENSTEWART'S DISCLOSURE OF ELECTROGAGNETIC WEAPONS USED TO KILL CERTAIN

TARGETED INDIVIDUALS DURING APRIL 10, 2016 RADIO INTERVIEW”

This exhibit, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the PETITIONER's

obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the PETITIONER's claims

and statements and to try to thwart the current attempts upon his life. The PETITTIONER has

explained in all courts the events as described by Karen Stewart well before May 9, 2016 when

the PETITIONER first came upon this information. Karen Stewart is a CREDIBLE CORROBORATOR

of the PETITIONERS CLAIMS over the past 10 years in litigation in both federal and state courts.

Karen Stewart graduated from Florida State University in 1979 with a BS degree in German

The Killing of a TI - Electromagnetic Weapons Page 1 of 70 Friday, May 13, 2016

by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media GroupCase 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 51 Filed 05/13/16 Page 1 of 70Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 54 Filed 05/23/16 Page 133 of 202





Language and a minor or co-major equivalent in Fine Art. She worked for NSA (National Security

Agency) from 1982 to 2010. Her resume will follow.

Her video interviews can be seen on the following YOUTUBE links:

Wheel of Freedom (WUA) 4/4/16 Ex-NSA Karen Stewart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10

NSA whistle blower Karen Stewart exposes targeted Individuals, 9/11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMg

On March 9, 2016 I was detained and falsely imprisoned by no less than 8 NSA Security

Police on the barracks of the Headquarters of the NSA at Ft. Meade Maryland. I was handcuffed,

and interrogated for over an hour, while my car was dog sniffed and searched. I was ordered to

return to Lancaster rather than continue on to Washington, D.C., and was ordered not to enter

any federally owned property again. The following is a video of my statement:

Statement and Video of False Imprisonment re Handcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at NSA

Headquarters (National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland) by 8 NSA Police officers on March

9, 2015 Recorded on March 11, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs

BACKGROUND

Stan J. Caterbone's International Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind

Control Relationships are outlined in the following statements and declarations, which have

already been proven and verified and have never been specifically contested in any court of law:

Stan J. Caterbone was a Federal Whistleblower in 1987 regarding ISC

The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was subject to in 1987

through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring

and Summer of 1987 after the Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive

Larry Resch.

The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline with Ted Koppel and

the Financial Times of London in May, July, and September of 1991 was most likely initiated or

was corroborated by Lancaster Newspapers reporter Thomas Flannary.

Thomas Flannary's mysterious death in February of 2004 was either murder or was a cover story














to hide the fact that he was a CIA operative used to control the flow of information,

disinformation, and propaganda. It is highly subject that he began his career with Lancaster

Newspapers in 1987 and is not a native Lancastrian.

The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after the False Arrests of

Stan J. Caterbone.

The official meeting with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler in

September of 1987, which was solicited by Agent Eisler was an effort to illegally interrogate Stan

J. Caterbone without a legal subpoena.

In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch Stan J.

Caterbone had personally solicited a vast array of local, state, and federal officials, including the

FBI and Congressman Robert Walker, PA State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in

the retaliation and slander campaign that was in progress. There is credible linkage between the

ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the

same, and the participation of LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis, Judge James

Cullen, and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control before 2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his

VICTIMIZATION of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was on the Board of

Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies through his

company S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill

Clinton for his Director of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public

scrutiny for his role in the ISC scandal.

In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

(CIA) and during his televised confirmation hearings the was subject to brutal array of questions

concerning his participation in the ISC scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve

both the Bush Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until

resigning in 2011.

There have been at least 3 documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone; 1987, 1991,

and 2004, all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas P. Caterbone's passing in 1996 was the






result of a wrongful death claim by Fulton Bank. Samuel A. Caterbone was most likely an KULTRA

murder tactic in Santa Barbara, California on December 25, 1984. Samuel P. Caterbone was most

likely the result of an MKULTRA murder tactic on July 20,2001 in New York city.

The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal enterprise

that violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and antitrust statutes.

The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in

U.S. District Courts, specifically in the Eastern District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-

4650, 14-02559, and other related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court

of Common Pleas.

THE DISCLOSURE

Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: “I Worked various projects over the

years, not just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status

and alliances, weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the

fall of the Iron Curtain and changing relations among newly liberated countries, economic and

diplomatic developments of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of

intelligence reports in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian

countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is

what got me fired because I questioned why my work was used to promote another employee

who had no experience with but, was credited with my work” .

The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal

electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the

article titled “NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light” and can be

found at: http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-

shadows-into-the-light

The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The

byline is as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a

follow-up to that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances,

the Whistleblower has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that

she again chose me to write her story.

KAREN STEWART'S TRANSCRIPT






http://canadafreepress.com/article/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption

http://canadafreepress.com/members/1/SherZieve/160

http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-the-light

“First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a “righteous” lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning

it is a clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated

criminal level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put,

I asked the NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report

series supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different

woman twice (2004 & 2005) one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a

known incompetent, but had methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers

within the Weapons & Space (W&S) Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG

and NSA Security decided to cover up the infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint

my complaint as “paranoid “and to fire me for a non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my

effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own work, given to the wrong woman. These

threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by the guilty personnel obviously

coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading as an “investigation” by

NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence showing my innocence

from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court with a

predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the

judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.

I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my family’s hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in

2011. All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena

evidence from the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA

Executive) who had broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006

Inspector General request for an investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well

as illegally bugging (burst bug) our home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and

likely search for blackmail material (no luck for them there).

After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-

stalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola

and NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with

the Leon County Sheriff’s Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA

also had personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps

property north of Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a “secret exercise”, just before the

second round of stalking harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA

Security to contact the Naval Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade,

Maryland along with NSA) to initially stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses

until NSA could send its own Security personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of






authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement

(FDLE) and its civilian group, “InfraGard”, made up of civilians recruited from their Ride-Along

programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why the civilians should actively

and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions about why laws and due

process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly jumped at the

opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).

Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a “cast-iron target”, meaning

multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my

home overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my

benefit. NSA also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts,

which could be anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both

home (to bug and monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle

GPS trackers to facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active

participants, others not assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a

special site “the big bad threat” to report my location and time I was there. People even snooped

in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying.

(“God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!”).

This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was

going for the usual “See, she’s paranoid, reporting harassment every day ‚Äì now just dismiss her

lawsuit!” But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit

and run, purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the

PETTITIONER on May 9, 2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and

botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my

spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched its removal

the night before my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using

my hobby art shop on a popular internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of

them. After all, they were mostly na√Øve, unsophisticated boobs who desperately

imagined that they were little James Bonds and that the greatest existential threat to

their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be decided, living in Tallahassee,

walking her dogs, visiting friends.

In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not

sufficiently being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my

lawsuit to recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level.

In 2009 I had researched “gang-stalking” and discovered it was a real and growing






phenomenon, but when “electrical harassment” was mentioned, I could not really grasp

the concept and wondered about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in

November 2015 that it does exist and is a horrific crime against humanity.

NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed

Energy Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons

emit multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated

to radio frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I can’t say I understand yet.

Now, with the help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is

almost 24/7 now with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons

over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures,

strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.

At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been

enlisted by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase

exposure in order to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting

in my location like good little sheeple.

The Leon County Sheriff’s Department as well as the Tallahassee Police

Department are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or

insulting me when I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this

new crime ‚Äì before I or one of my family is dead. They can’t quite grasp the fact that

this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects the police or any official from this new

weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have

experience using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval

Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the “Silent

Warriors” because they specialize in the use of Directed Energy Weapons. I’m sure the

Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and may have even gotten a

request from NSA to borrow a few for their “secret exercise” in Tallahassee.

Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless

they say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine

instead of simply “settling” for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel

confident they can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with it…

including any leader or politician.”

These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the PETITIONER's






claim of the value of the PETITIONER's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S.

Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with

unnecessary filings, however this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the

shoulders of all those in the government that ignored the PETITIONER's pleas for help to resolve

these issues dating back to the days immediately following the meeting with International Signal

& Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone, Date: May 10, 2016 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Advanced Media Group1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA [email protected](717) 669-2163






mailto:[email protected]

http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/

There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths

EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its Corruption – Karen Stewart

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives February 20, 2014

3 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

At the very least, for the past few months to a year it has become increasingly evident that—although not all—many agencies of the US Federal government have become increasingly dirty,perverse and corrupt and require a deep and thorough cleaning.

The US Secret Service has previously been exposed as “including claims of involvement withprostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps,improper use of weapons and drunken behavior” and the IRS was caught and admitted to denyingObama’s political enemies (aka “TEA Party, Christians, religious Jews, conservatives) theirConstitutional rights while allowing “progressive” groups (aka Liberals, Leftists, Marxists, Maoists,Socialists, Communists) theirs. And—love him, hate him or fall somewhere in-between—EdwardSnowden shone a very bright light on the unconstitutional domestic mega-spying of one of theseclandestine agencies—the National Security Agency. Thus far, under Obama’s increasingly ironrule, few-to-no members of these agencies have even been indicted by Congress for their blatantcrimes against the American people.

The NSA appears to have begun as a patriotic organization that was geared toward protecting theUSA and its citizens. Whether or not that was its original intended purpose is a subject fordiscussion and speculation. However, portions of the NSA seem to have devolved into somethingvery sinister. Today’s interview will concentrate on this agency.

NSA Analyst. Due to a number of substantive reasons, this former Analyst’s identity cannot bedivulged at this time and will be referred to as “W.” I have, however, confirmed this individual’sprior employment and credentials via a well-known NSA “Whistleblower.” The informationdisseminated to me, amongst other things tells a sordid story of corruption and how employeesare silenced into submission—via fear—within the agency,

The InterviewSher:Thanks so much for being with me, today, in order to provide essential additionalinformation to the public on how many of their tax dollars are really being spent. You wereemployed by the NSA for over two decades. Would you tell the readers what initially attracted youto the agency as well as how it has deteriorated over time?

Karen Stewart: Like many people from families with a strong history of serving our country,coming out of college, I looked to find a way to best utilize my particular interests and talents inservice to my fellow Americans. The mission of the NSA it seemed to me, was to stop threatscoming to our shores. It’s charter clearly targeted foreign nationals on foreign soil who did orcould intend us harm. That appealed to me as a righteous endeavor and honorable tack for my lifeto take.







http://canadafreepress.com/About-us/

http://canadafreepress.com/print_friendly/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption

http://canadafreepress.com/comments/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption


Sher: You’ve shared with me how the NSA deals with its employees who bring legitimatecomplaints to their superiors. How thoroughly intimidating and threatening are their behaviorstoward those who balk at their adverse treatment? Would you give a few examples?

Karen Stewart: Apparently the nature of NSA Security degenerated under General MichaelHayden, the previous Director of NSA (DIRNSA), who promoted a very questionable mid-levelSecurity manager to a power position within Security. Hayden had originally been tasked toeviscerate NSA since a very shallow and short-sighted Congress believed that the fall of the IronCurtain meant no danger existed anywhere anymore that required the existence of a robust NSApresence. There evolved, under him, a gratuitously vicious bully mindset that employees were tobe intimidated at any opportunity not only to drive them out of NSA but to cut back on peoplereporting problems that made NSA look bad, especially problems involving upper management.

Under Hayden and his successor, General Keith Alexander, the filing of complaints to or requestsfor investigations by the NSA EEO or the OIG (Office of the Inspector General) were ofteninexplicably blown off despite adequate evidence or the presence of willing witnesses. Then theperson who had filed the complaint would be subjected to an out of cycle “reinvestigation”interview with Security as well as polygraph exam, wherein the tone of the Security person wasnot neutral—as it should be—but, hostile with far-fetched or even ridiculous non-issues presentedas potentially problematic. This was a Security shot across the bow to warn the person that hehad crossed the line by filing the complaint. If he pursued the complaint, Security would lean onhis managers to heavily discourage him from doing what he thought was proper and was indeed aprotected action under the law. If he persisted, did his own amateur investigation, or toldcoworkers about the situation, he might be called down to Security multiple times and accused ofbeing “paranoid and delusional” based on his complaint, and his job threatened.

The worse the infraction reported, especially if a high level manager looked to be involved, themore severe the reaction by Security. In cases of egregious wrong-doing by a manager, Securitywould review the personnel files, medical files, and financial statements to find anything theycould use to threaten or blackmail him with, or pretend to misinterpret some tidbit of informationas something it was not.

Some people were forced to sign admissions of guilt of preposterous misinterpretations of facts inorder to keep their jobs, thereby killing their credibility and complaint. When nothing was found insuch files that could be used, a false accusation of espionage or leaking classified materials ginnedup by Security, was used to justify a Security intrusion into the person’s home to search forblackmail material, further assess the interests and personality of the targeted individual (TI), andplant bugs and abscond with an extra set of keys for further intrusions. The more the personobjected to being bullied, the more heavy-handed Security became, insisting that hostility towardthem indicated wrong-doing on the TI’s part. Thus the TI would become harried andharassed for a crime he never committed, if it ever even was committed, and torepeated accusations by Security Psych services of a non-existent mental illness, morethan adequately supported by years of internal, psychological evaluations stating hewas mentally sound (Paranoia with delusions is rare and certainly never occursovernight, but that does not deter a Security psychologist attack dog, whose favoritemode of attack employs reference to this malady).

The more a person stood his ground, the more “personal” it became to Security, whichthen became dedicated to the personal destruction of the TI. Under the pretext of thefake accusation of espionage or leaking classified information, Security would slanderthe individual with his coworkers, work friends and managers to isolate him and applyyet more pressure. Many backed away from supporting the TI in fear for their careersand maybe even freedom. Certainly this sent a message to the workforce in the TI’sarea that NSA Security was at its essence, a rogue, unaccountable and psychotic entitythat was to be greatly feared.

Once NSA Security had decided upon the removal of the TI for failing to be sufficientlycowed, then false evidence was given to the FBI liaisons assigned to NSA. This would






engender a fraudulent FISA warrant, which loosed FBI surveillance and investigatorsupon the person for a few weeks or months, further slandering him to his work andsocial circles and thereby putting pressure on him by their constant presence. When theFBI would find no basis for the accusation, they would drop the case and move on.However, at that point, Security would send in their own personnel sans warrant, toovertly stalk and harass the TI , 24/7.

In some instances, Security has even gone into the person’sneighborhood to recruit “snitches” and augment harassmentwith hostile civilians convinced the TI is an enemy of the state,based on baseless Security slander.

Intrusions would be made into his home to remove gathered evidence ormove things around as a psychological ploy and his car would be secretly“GPS’d” to facilitate vehicular stalking and aggressive driving games.There have even been reports of pet murders by poisoning as anescalation of the harassment with the inferred threat that perhaps itcould be the TI’s child or himself next. The harassment is essentiallyelevated until the TI either “breaks” and assaults a harasser orcomplains to Security about the insane and sadistic, not to mentioncriminal way in which he is being mistreated. This is what Securityplanned for and is ready to jump on as their springboard to terminatinghis employment.

His security clearance is immediately pulled, he is warehoused in a menial job until adequatepaperwork and a back-story can be fabricated or forged to falsely present a termination due tomental instability or illness, and the person is fired. Of course there is an appeals process, but it isthoroughly corrupted. No matter how much evidence supports the victim and how little supportsNSA, NSA always “wins” these cases where it is clear the person was targeted for dismissal. Ofcourse, this does nothing but embolden more degenerate or criminal behavior while making itclear that the person reporting evil will be considered the problem, and that in reality no laborlaws or whistle protection laws can actually protect an NSA employee, because real watch dogentities don’t exist within NSA and state and Federal authorities routinely turn a blind eye to thereported abuses even as they become more criminal and seditious.

I shake my head at sycophant, disingenuous politicians who claim Edward Snowden could have orshould have gone through “proper internal authorities” to report the abuses and criminal actsbeing committed within NSA. Would that be to the thoroughly corrupted, attack dog-watch dogentities, or the thoroughly oblivious or compromised politicians responsible for oversight who arein fact, in the NSA’s pocket due to bribery, blackmail or stupidity?

Sher: The NSA seems to suffer from the some of the same maladies as did the recent outing ofthe Secret Service. Without becoming too specific, would you give us a general idea as toadvancement for sexual favors that have occurred within the agency? How defeating is that toemployees who are simply working to protect the country while their bosses are indulging insexual liaisons with lower level employees?

Karen Stewart: In my career, promotions were always hard to come by, meted out perhapsevery five years if you were a good or exceptional worker, but male managers discovered thatthey held the keys to paradise in regard to attractive or even “acceptable” women willing to takeshortcuts. These were the women who would make promotions in stunningly rapid succession withlittle to no accomplishments - of their own, that is. While others killed themselves with years ofgrueling shift work or even multiple dangerous foreign assignments only to find themselvesevaluated as a 3.6 on a scale of 5, when an attractive, morally loose recent college graduate






would receive a 4.8 for essentially alphabetizing a shelf of reference books her first 6 months onthe job. This made many, many people bitter and certainly sent the wrong signal to the hardestworkers and the most talented. Though many stopped being as dedicated to their jobs, others didindeed press ahead and worked tirelessly knowing their reward was the mission accomplished andnot likely appropriate recognition. Capable men despaired of receiving deserved promotions andwomen almost feared being promoted for exceptional work, fearing they would be assumed to beone of the typically incapable promotion bimbos among the bloated management. Expertise andknowledge became commodities to guard and not share with new workers, fearing you would notreap the benefits of your own work. This of course created a situation where expertise and insightmust be gained and regained from scratch, losing precious time training up area or target expertsto the detriment of the mission.

It was very discouraging to see immature or degenerate bosses spending their time flirting andchasing skirts, the very same people who were charged with competently reviewing your work,(keeping apprised of the big picture so people felt free to specialize their research), and whoseresponsibility it was to accurately and honestly represent their people before promotion boards.But the atmosphere of secrecy, the strict laws about divulging names of NSA employees oranything that occurred there, emboldened certain men to believe that their wives and familieswould never know of their indiscretions, and turned work time into play time for them. And nowapparently young males are also being pursued as sexual toys. One has to wonder what is beingmissed in the realm of highly perishable intelligence leads by distracted managerial incompetents.

Sher: As an additional example of NSA intimidation, one of the things you’d said may be shared isyour experience with the “3 Amigos.” Would you tell us about them?

Karen Stewart:There were three eccentric looking older males who were often seen in the NSAOPS1 cafeteria together, whom we also got to know by word of mouth, as master electricians well-versed in computer science. They were nicknamed by some in the analyst field as “Rasputin”,“Santa”, and “Choo Choo” or “the engineer”, due to their highly unusual appearances and dress.One eye witness being harassed on yet another NSA Security retaliatory witch hunt, reportedseeing one of these men at her home, on her property, when she discovered indications that herhome had been broken into, her cable box broken into, and her phone hacked, leaving tell-taleclicking sounds at regular intervals whenever she used her phone. Any phone tap done by warrantis done at the carrier’s hub under their auspices and will not “click”, only illegal hack jobs “click”. She noted him not only as a trespasser being somewhere he should not have been, butrecognized him by his highly unusual appearance from work. When she attempted to look him upin the NSA data base by career specialty, she found that what should have been his photo, whichshould have been a source of pride since he was of the rank to be a Flag Badger (Manager whoserank is senior enough to garner a photo with the American flag in the background), was instead aphoto of a desert animal called a Meercat indicating that he wanted his identity hidden from thegeneral NSA population.

Sher: With regards to many who have said that the NSA’s collection of meta-data on all forms ofcommunication between legal citizens of the USA is unconstitutional, also indicated is the fact thatnot one terrorist act has been stopped by said collection. It appears good old-fashioned policework is what still gets the “perp.” In your opinion, is this accurate?

Karen Stewart: I think it is indeed true that the meta data collection ruse within the USAdistracts from tried and true research and investigation, which the latter method apparently DIDINDEED uncover the 9/11 plot months before it happened, well in time to have prevented it,according to two separate analysts with whom I have spoken, one just two days after 9/11 as hebroke down and sobbed his heart out, repeating “We could have saved them! We could havesaved them! But they wouldn’t let us report it!”, and the other several years later, who maintainedthe same story of being threatened and forbidden to report any warning about 9/11, then beingharassed and fired for a non-existent mentally illness. However, it is a good means to track yourpolitical enemies and detractors and their affiliates within the US - for future reference? It wouldappear much more for the self-preservation and expansion of NSA as the ubiquitous Orwellian BigBrother than for the protection of the USA. With the power the NSA wields, it could easily






influence border control issues and immigration issues to make us not as susceptible to terroristintrusions and infiltrations, but that would undermine their power grab and expansion within theUS, something never intended at NSA’s creation - and for good reason.

Sher:As a former long time employee of the NSA, what do you believe—if anything—can be doneto correct the problems within the agency?

Karen Stewart:There is no doubt that NSA is now run by those sycophants and sociopaths whoare the least desirable to have in any position of such sensitivity and trust and are purging NSAranks of people with integrity. Compromising activity that would rightfully cost you your clearance,is now viewed as intrinsic perks of the job once you reach a certain pay grade. These lesserleaders have turned NSA into an American Gestapo Wanna-Be agency. NSA lost its way with non-serious super grade playboys not mature enough for the responsibility of the job of managing anddirecting NSA, compounding the problem by promoting sycophants to protect their backs as wellas lightweights with whom to have “sexcapades” behind office doors, but in that group also hasrisen opportunistic sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to more and more power, any way theycan get it, and by conniving and ruthlessness have blown past incompetent, distractedmanagement to change the very nature of the NSA from watchman to the American people tojack booted prison guard.

If the Legislative Branch is possessed of anyone with the least bit of courage and common sense,they would demand super clearances for those on the Intelligence Oversight Committees so thatyears or decades of abusive behaviors, kingdom building, or even crimes can not continually beswept under the rug by telling these particular politicians, “You don’t have the need to know, justtrust us.” Obviously, they cannot be trusted. An appointment to that Committee would of coursehave to become much more exclusive, requiring a thorough vetting as any job with a Top Secretclearance should. But to deal with the toxic management at NSA now, I would require every FlagBadger and Security manager to account for himself and what he adds to the mission. If he ispork, retire him or require him to laterally transfer to another agency. Before that however, Iwould require that every single Flag Badger and every Security group manager take a polygraphby non-NSA affiliated or non-NSA sympathetic sources to account for the millions of dollarswasted on their vicious and illegal war on NSA employees who dutifully report fraud, waste, abuseas well as sexual predation and treason. Those who are found to be guilty of such things asfalsifying accusations against innocent employees; fabricating false witnesses and evidence;engaging in illegal acts of breaking and entering; falsifying FISA warrant justifications; lying to theFBI about a targeted victim’s criminality; falsifying psychological assessments; subverting liedetector exams by screaming at the targeted subject during or just before the exam to createfalse impressions of guilt; hiding or destroying exonerating evidence supporting their victims’claims; intimidating or roughing up witnesses; coordinating or participating in criminal stalkingand harassment activities, illegal break-ins, illegal wire taps, organizing and paying civilian groupsunder the table to augment harassment of targeted employees, and lastly, conspiring to effect orcover up any or all of these actions. And any NSA employee in that group who pleads the 5th,should be fired and stripped of his retirement since this type of betrayal rots a country fromwithin. NSA must be recreated, and returned to the stated task in their founding charter offocusing on foreign enemies overseas.

Sher: W, so much of the information you’ve provided is truly astounding! Thanks so much forbeing with us today and I hope you’ll be available for another should ongoing events require one.

Click to view 3 Comments

Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are widely carried bymultiple internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have alsoappeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications,and on multiple university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio






http://canadafreepress.com/comments/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption

NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light – Karen Stewarty

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives March 28, 2016

0 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

AddThis Sharing Buttons

Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to PinterestMore AddThisShare options

In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to thatcolumn. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblowerhas decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose meto write her story.

Her name is Karen Stewart Karen Stewart

BIOEducation

• Freshman year - Schiller College, Strasbourg, Fr.• Sophomore - Senior years, graduated from Florida State University (79)• BS in German Language and a minor or co-major equivalent in fine art

Work History: 1982-2010 NSA (National Security Agency

Underwent initial retraining from 1982 - 83, on the job training to become a linguist in a neededforeign language (chosen to train in depth in Russian since my college major, German was not indemand but I had also studied Russian and French with good results).

Worked various projects over the years, not just USSR/Russia, but various countriesresearching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances, weapons development andproliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron Curtain and changingrelations among newly liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments of certaintarget countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of OperationIraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on theAmerican invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned why my work wasused to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited with my work.

Note...Due to the Top Secret nature of the work, the above summary is slightly vague, by design.

The Interview

Sher: Karen, thanks for taking the time to speak with me and it’s so good to have you back andthis time under your name! As a Whistleblower, what finally made you decide to come out fromthe shadows?

Karen: I always intended to link my name with my story because it is a story that needs to betold, but since I have a lawsuit against NSA (technically an appeal of an unlawful, employeraction, i.e. my termination at the 28 point year of my career for trying to request an investigationby the NSA Inspector General), sitting under a gag order demanded by NSA, on the docket at theEqual Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in Baltimore, I could not do so without riskingthe adjudication going against me for that reason alone. However, in 2015 NSA Security made thedecision to yet again engage in a massive slander campaign against me in my new location, thus






http://canadafreepress.com/article/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption


http://canadafreepress.com/About-us/

http://canadafreepress.com/print_friendly/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-the-light

http://canadafreepress.com/comments/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-the-light


breaking its own gag order so I feel no compunction to be held to a standard required by theEEOC judge at NSA’s request that NSA itself clearly holds in utter contempt.

Sher: Since we last talked, a lot has happened with you. You have refused to drop yourdiscrimination lawsuit against the NSA and have shared with me that the agency has stepped upits efforts against you…personally.

You’re now being stalked by what appear to be NSA operatives. Is that correct? As you reported tome they, also, seem to be using electronic emanation technology to both stop and damage you. Ibelieve former NSA employee and Whistleblower Russel Tice reported on this, also. This is reallydeep “dark side” information. Would you tell the readers what they’re doing to you, [possibly]others and why?

Karen: First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a “righteous” lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaningit is a clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditatedcriminal level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put,I asked the NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence reportseries supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely differentwoman twice (2004 & 2005) one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was aknown incompetent, but had methodically sexually compromised many of the male managerswithin the Weapons & Space (W&S) Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IGand NSA Security decided to cover up the infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paintmy complaint as “paranoid “and to fire me for a non-existent mental illness if I did not drop myeffort to get credit for and the promotion for my own work, given to the wrong woman. Thesethreats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by the guilty personnel obviouslycoached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading as an “investigation” byNSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence showing my innocencefrom ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court with apredetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and thejudge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.

I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my family’s hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidencefrom the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSAExecutive) who had broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006Inspector General request for an investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as wellas illegally bugging (burst bug) our home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment andlikely search for blackmail material (no luck for them there).

After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-stalkingme by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and NSASecurity personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the LeonCounty Sheriff’s Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also hadpersonnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property northof Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a “secret exercise”, just before the second round ofstalking harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security tocontact the Naval Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Marylandalong with NSA) to initially stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSAcould send its own Security personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, itappears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and itscivilian group, “InfraGard”, made up of civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. Asusual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why the civilians should actively and passivelystalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions about why laws and due process were tobe completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundredsto gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).

Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a “cast-iron target”, meaningmultiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my






home overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for mybenefit. NSA also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts,which could be anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, bothhome (to bug and monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicleGPS trackers to facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the activeparticipants, others not assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to aspecial site “the big bad threat” to report my location and time I was there. People even snoopedin my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying.(“God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!”).

This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going forthe usual “See, she’s paranoid, reporting harassment every day ‚Äì now just dismiss her lawsuit!”But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run, purposelysideswiping my car, and botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoilerthat destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched itsremoval the night before my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, usingmy hobby art shop on a popular internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. Afterall, they were mostly na√Øve, unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they werelittle James Bonds and that the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waitingfor her lawsuit to be decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.

In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was notsufficiently being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back offmy lawsuit to recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriatepay level. In 2009 I had researched “gang-stalking” and discovered it was areal and growing phenomenon, but when “electrical harassment” wasmentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered about itsexistence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does existand is a horrific crime against humanity.

NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices calledDirected Energy Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night.These mobile weapons emit multiple types of electrical emanations fromultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio frequencies, to other kindsof wave variations I can’t say I understand yet. Now, with the help ofcertain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost24/7 now with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types ofweapons over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heartattacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder weaponfor a corrupt government. At this point, when we leave the house, acriminal base of stalkers has been enlisted by NSA to follow us and aimthe DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order to speedup death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in mylocation like good little sheeple.

The Leon County Sheriff’s Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department are draggingtheir feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when I try to enlisttheir help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime ‚Äì before I or one of my family isdead. They can’t quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects thepolice or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits intheir ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that theNaval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the “Silent Warriors”because they specialize in the use of Directed Energy Weapons. I’m sure the Naval Security Groupbase in Pensacola has many on hand and may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a






few for their “secret exercise” in Tallahassee.

Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they say you do. Ifthey use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of simply “settling” for atenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they can murder anyone,anywhere, for any reason and get away with it…including any leader or politician.

Sher: Why in the world do you think the NSA simply didn’t settle the suit? With all of thedocumentation you have, it seems that they are guilty of the discrimination and could have spentfar less of the taxpayers’ money to simply pay you off and “make it go away.” They would, also,have avoided this coming out into the open. Are they that arrogant and Narcissistic?

Karen: This has truly NEVER made any sense to me or any of my friends, even those who workedat NSA. NSA could have investigated, claimed a “mistake” had been made and retroactivelypromoted me without even addressing the unethical behavior of W&S personnel. Instead, the IGrefused to investigate, illegally of course, but I could not have made him do his job. Plus, theguilty were instructed to blame me for what turned out to be the first leak by ex-NSA executiveThomas Drake, despite the fact that I had no access to, knowledge of or training in the type ofmaterial he leaked (computer technology) and he was identified as the source of that leak sixmonths before I was fired. The polygraph section of Security actively tried to sabotage mypolygraph exams in response to the false counter-accusation by inappropriately screaming andthreatening me, making it impossible to pass a polygraph, which ruined my first polygraph in thisregard though I passed the next two of the three given in reaction to the false accusation.

The EEOC is capped at $300,000 actual damages, no punitive allowed. My intention was to get thelost difference in my wages as a GS-12 when I should have been a GS-14, and to get theappropriate level of retirement. Yet, clearly, NSA has spent millions organizing and paying civilians(and greasing the palms of crooked law enforcement) to harass, bully, intimidate,and quiteobviously viciously slander me.

Do they engage in such psychopathic behavior “because they can”? Because they simply have noreal oversight? The operational head of NSA Security is indeed rumored far and wide to be anactual psychopath who is obsessed with paintings of Dante’s Inferno.

A coworker who worked in NSA Human Resources says she remembered when the resumes ofinappropriate people (criminals, perverts, mentally unstable) were automatically thrown away butsuddenly when General Hayden, a former NSA Director, promoted this particular man, theresumes of thieves, moral degenerates, etc., were then coveted by Security. She said that shewas so upset that she had to find a different job. I did read an opinion on the Anti-polygraph sitethat NSA Security leadership, and hence all of Security in essence, could be said to suffer fromDark Triad personality disorder, which is a dangerous combination of such things as (malignant)narcissism, sociopathy, etc. Their egos are such that they are obsessed with winning at all costs…even fighting to keep a known false accusation from being proven false by their victim, becausethey exist in their own projected narrative. They exist in their own lies and cannot stand beingexposed. This means they follow their own agendas. What is good for NSA Security leadership,even at the cost of NSA or the USA. Their allegiances are to themselves. This has made mewonder, of late, if the woman who Security protected instead of reprimanding or firing for sexuallycompromising W&S management was not a Security plant, meant to do just that. And, in sodoing, was NSA Security procuring a means to blackmail these managers for themselves oranother entity, perhaps foreign?

Sher: You have multiple photos and even drawings you’ve made of you stalkers. You’ve alsoindicated to me that the NSA has been in touch with your local law enforcement. Said lawenforcement is siding with the NSA against you…a private citizen. What do your attorneys have tosay about these?

Karen: At the beginning of my search for a law firm to take my case, Melville Johnson PCinformed me that I had potentially two cases, in 2009, an employment law case and a criminalcase. I could only afford to pursue the employment case since I was facing illegal termination on





CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage No. 100 of 258 Monday November 14, 2016

false pretenses within a few months. While my lawyers have recorded the information about thenew assault campaign by NSA in Florida, thus far their pleas with the EEOC for some kind ofresponse because their client is now in physical danger have been completely ignored.

What has been going on in Florida is entirely criminal and could be a separate lawsuit, to eveninclude law enforcement in regard to their depraved negligence…if not complicity. But, at themoment, I am concerned with surviving the relentless Directed Energy Weapons assaults. If I donot, then my family will have to consider a wrongful death lawsuit against NSA, FBI (that refuse toget involved because NSA is involved), and the FDLE, the TPD and Leon County Sheriff’sDepartment as well as certain complicit neighbors accepting a new riding mower or new carpetingin exchange for helping NSA murder an “inconvenient” person who actually thought she had anyConstitutional, human, or Civil Rights.

Sher: With regards to your lawsuit, what are your current plans?

Karen: Good question. Reporting and recording the new barrage of assaults has whittled deeplyinto my retainer. This was hard enough to maintain after spending about $110,000, thus far, andoften countering ridiculous and frivolous legal shenanigans by NSA to waste my money. With anoutrageously unresponsive EEOC, which may indeed be a complete and obscene sham for show,one wonders ‘why continue with the pretense that we exist as a nation of laws’? Clearly, we donot.

The government has no desire for a level playing field to impede its quest for complete tyranny.We are now a nation of wolves and sheeple. I’m sure that after getting wind of this article, NSAwill come to the EEOC with big crocodile tears claiming they need to win by default because “I”broke the gag order after they themselves spent millions, bald-faced lying to thousands ofcivilians, law enforcement and (apparently) the FBI about me, invoking National Security Lettersto swear them to secrecy and to hide the true nature of their faux “secret exercise” in Tallahassee—i.e., enticing a foolish community to stalk, harass and commit murder for Big Brother.

But, God forbid the victim would speak out!

It truly sickens me that I spent my career trying to protect and serve my fellow Americans whennot only my government but these unworthy mercenary, sociopaths have stabbed me in the back.Some of the stalkers have even been Iraqi War veterans…some of whom might not have returnedalive without my reports.

I can’t think a lot about the lawsuit with each nocturnal assault leaving me wondering if I or oneof my family will not wake up tomorrow. I’m sentenced to death for being a patriot. What acountry. I read Psalm 91 & 94 nightly, praying God will want to erase this growing evil from ourcountry. But, I also remember that Ruth Graham said a while ago, “if God doesn’t judge America,He’ll have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.”

Americans are just not the people they and we used to be and, therefore, our leaders are eitherapathetic cowards who tolerate evil or potentially monsters like NSA Security—who show that theycan be and are not responsible to anyone but themselves.

Is NSA Security even able to be reined in anymore? Or would any potential leader be found deadof a microwave induced heart attack if he tried to? Someone ought to care but I may not bearound long enough to see it.

Sher: Thanks you so much for all you’ve done and I sincerely hope and pray you’re wrong, Karen.It’s individuals like you who founded the United States of America on Godly principles and anunwavering sense of ethics.

*Karen may be contacted for interviews at [email protected]







Court rejects man's claim that Lancaster County's residents are torturing... http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/05/post_38.html

1 of 2 5/13/2016 2:21 AM






CHAPTERDIVIDER




US District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvana Section 3189 Federal False Claim Act

Property of Advance Media Group Page 2598 of 2953 10/19/2006CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Page 5 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016






Property of Advance Media Group Page 2605 of 2953 10/19/2006CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 10 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





July 10,1990QUALITY TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

This proposal will detail the technical approach and the quality assurance proceduresnecessary for the end to end production of the Compact Disc-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM)storage memory containing DMA Mapping, Charting, & Geodesy (MC&G) product data.

1. Quality Control - Address the internal quality assurance/quality controlmanagement plan for the end-to-end CD-ROM production (including anysubcontracted items) which will be used to satisfy the requirements in theStatement of Work.

(SEE ATTACHMENT: FLOW CHART FOR CD-ROM QUALITY CONTROL)

The Defense Mapping Agency (DMA), U.S. Department of Defense, furnishedMapping, Charting, & Geodesy (MC&G) data containing the logical CD-ROMimage, will be used to create the physical image in adherence to the Red andYellow Book specifications, and the ISO 9660 specifications. The data will beinspected utilizing the Data Discrepancy reporting format, as described.Uponcompletion of the mastering process, the stamper is subject to a Binary DataCompare and the EDC/ECC Integrity Compare test for a 100% correlation. TheBinary Data Compares the data on a replica of the master stamper to the data onthe media used to create the master. If any one of the millions of bytes does notcompare, the master stamper is not approved.

Each master manufactured is also subjected to a 100% EDC/ECC integritycomparison, adhering to Yellow Book standards. This test consists of readingeach data comparing it to the EDC/ECC data contained on the disc that wascalculated by the encoding system during the mastering process. If any of theEDC/ECC data segments do not compare, other than 100% correlation, the masterstamper is not approved, and must be reprocessed.

The premastering and mastering production process is performed by DiscManufacturing, Inc. (DMI), formerly Disctronics, Inc. American Helix and DMIhave developed operating systems that result in a highly efficient productionprocess that allows for exceptional quality assurance standards through theconcentration of energies and resources in the front end and manufacturingprocedures respectively. The prescribed production systems have demonstratedon time delivery of the end product to customers and uninterupted service duringeven the shortest turn around deliveries. Production procedures have beenretrofitted to include the proprietary mastering equipment developed by DMI.






Stan J. Caterbone

Written and Authored by Stan J. Caterbone, Advanced Media Group

This operational strategy has allowed American Helix to further the developmentof its respective proprietary 3rd generationmonoline manufacturing module,currently being adopted by Cincinnati Milicron, Inc. for resale to the CD industryat large. This has also qaurunteed American Helix that its available resourceswould not cause any comprimise to the quality during the premastering andmastering process by utilizing DMI, which has in itself developed proventechnologies for the front end. This operating system has a demonstrated capacityof over 100 CD manufacturing projects during any given month.

1. Qulity Control (Continued)

American Helix stampers are given a visual inspection upon arrival in QualityControl. Once the protective Silitect coating is removed the stamper is checked forany stains or residual film that may exist from the metal forming process. If thedata surface and backfinish are acceptable to proceed the stamper is loaded into aDigital Intelligence Systems Corporation SP-2 Stamper Analyzer. The SP-2 is acomprehensive computer test system that monitors Sony/Phillips Red Book dataparameters such as BLER (less than 50 errors per second, when averaged over a10 second interval), BRST (less than 7 consecutive errors per second), UNCRerrors on a per second basis as well as 10 sec., total error count and average errorcount of the entire stamper surface. I3 and I11 voltage measurments are taken (persec.) as well as drop out detection, Symmetry, Peak to Peak, Radial Noise, andCrosstalk (on track). All measurments are monitored to be well within spec ofSony/Phillips Red Book. A printout of this test is made and stored in the customerfile as well as on the SP-2 hard drive for future reference.

AUTOMATIC INSPECTION DEVICES SERIES 1000

The AID system utilized at American helix is the first stage of product inspectionin the primary process. The inspection system is automated by Convac I/O spindletables and Adept pick and place robotics for consistent and reliable performance.After the discs store on racks for cooling of the polycarbonate they are then loadedonto the input table of the AID system and the system is re-aligned for testing ofthe new product. As the robot sets the discs one at a time onto the AID stationspindle the disc is rotated one full revolution and 3 test lamps referenced to theAID software will either accept or reject the disc. The main function of the AIDsystem is to check the CD for any physical defects or errors that may haveoccurred in the molding process. The system also checks for Birefringence, Theinner and outer Eccentricity (variations within +/- 50), Reflectivity level (not lessthan 75%), and Warp level of the substrate. The 4 main reject areas on this systemare Surface Flaws, Pinholes and Missing Data (free of E22, two bit correctable,and E32 errors), Dense Flaws, and Track Flaws, each having a separate anddifferent threshold (size and level) (not contain radial surface defects greater than






300 micrometers and no tangential surface defects greater than 2 micrometers,nor any other defects which cause 2 bit error correction (E22) in the seconddecoder)for rejection. The AID system also tests the disc for skew. Since everydisc is inspected by the AID system and also visually inspected before beingpackaged American Helix maintains a higher level of quality product to theconsumer.

COMPACT DISC COMPUTER AIDED TEST SYSTEM (CD-CATS)

CD CATS SA-2 is a widely used CD analysis system for practically every dataparameter stored on disc. American Helix samples the discs being molded atintervals throughout the run (every 100 or every 200, depending on the size of thejob) The sampled disc are then checked on the CD CATS for a broad range ofpotential errors before being given the ok to pass.

1. Qulity Control (Continued)

The three main areas of testing done by the CATS are Static Data, Vertical Data,and Test Data each pertinent to a different spec section of Sony/Phillips. Includedin the Static Data is the Table of Contents and TBR (percentage of Block Errors inthe table of contents) The machine then scans for Start of Lead In Diameter, Startof Program, Maximum Information Diameter, Scanning Velocity, Disc TrackPitch, Eccentricity of tracks (within +-50), signal voltage in the Push-Pull circuitry,and HF level crosstalk. The Cross Interleaved Reed Solomon (CIRC) is alsoverified on the CD-CATS.

The Vertical Data is a maximum and minimum measurement of the verticaldeviation of the disc from the reference plane of the disc. Expressed in millimetersand degrees this measurement allows the viewer to quickly see how the semi-conductor laser beam is being reflected and read.

The third test section of the CATS is where error correction analysis, I3 and I11,reflectivity, Symmetry (not less than 20), and Block Error Rate are monitored. Inthe Test Data section the user can record errors as they appear in the 1st and 2nddecoders correcting 1 bit, 2 bit, and 3 bit (or uncorrectable at the 2nd decoder)errors. Any 3 bit errors in the 2nd decoder (or E32) are failed product as well asany Block Error Rate with a maximum measurement of 150 even though standardis 220/sec.

The molding technicians will make any possible changes to reduce or eliminate






problems such as these at the beginning of the run.

The CD-Diagnostics software, a diagnostic program that we developed, will testthe seek performance and the read performance. The CD-Diagnostics wasdeveloped to help users with the installation and maintenance of CD-ROM drives.Sector counts will also be analyzed here.

At the time of recieving the DMA label film and art work for the printed materialsand the disc printing, the Manufacturing will inspect the respective materials forcompletness and conformance to all required specifications as defined by DMA.The inspectors will also verify the quality of materials needed to deliver therespective results during the production processes. If the materials do not passinspection, the Customer Service Representative will notify DMA for consultation.The required inserts and liners will be forwarded to WMG, Inc. after finalapproval. WMG, Inc., has demonstrated abilities in both quality and on timedelivery of such materials, and specializes in the printing of CD materials.

Upon the delivery of the prescribe pamphlets and liners, the ManufacturingManager will again inspect the materials for final aproval as required by allspecifications and quality assurace standards.

During the printing process of the CD-ROM discs, the Manufacturing Managerwill again ispect the respective printing screens for conformity and qualitynecessary to produce the required results as required by specifications and qualityassurance standards. If the screens do not meet these respective requirments, newscreens will be produced.

1. Quality Control (Continued)

During the printing process, 100% of all product will again be ispected atmagnified inspection stations for printing quality, and again for surface flaws onthe media itself. Only approved product will be forwarded for packaging andshipping.

2.Sample Compact Disc Quality - Provide three (3) sample discs with will be evaluatedusing the performance criteria found in section 2.3.2 of the Statement of Work(Attachment (2) to the RFP .

SEE ENCLOSED SAMPLES:PENTAGON MILDOCS DISCLASERTEX - THE DEMOAMP EADS DISC

3.Quality organization - Address staffing and lines of authority, degree of organizational






freedom/authority, policy for producing a quality product the first time, andmonitoring the quality of product.

(SEE EXHIBIT II/ORGANIZATIONAL CHART)

The Director Of Optical Publishing, (POP) will have the responsibility ofmanaging the entire project for the end to end manufacturing of the CD-ROMdiscs. The Quality Assurance Technicians will provided real time status duringthe respective processes for the disc manufacturing. The Customer Service Repwill provide the same with respect to the printing and packaging processes. TheQuality Assurance Technicians will drive the manufacturing process by directingthe premastering, mastering, mastering, primary and secondary processes. Onlyupon approval and acceptance of the quality assurance tests and analysis, willproduction proceed.

The Production Control Manager will direct the overall scheduling of the projectwith specific regards to the primary and secondary processes. He will have theresponsibility of coordinating the efforts of all primary and secondary processingpersonnel.

The Manufacturing Manager will assume the responsibility of the managing theefforts of the secondary process and packaging efforts. The ManufacturingManager will bear ultimate responsibility for delivering a finished productmeeting any and all quality assurance standards with regards to coating, printing,packaging, and physical characteristics.

American Helix approaches the quality issue of its products with a simplephilosophy, invest time, energies, and resources into reducing the risk of error. Bydeveloping a quality assurance system that provides for the immediate testingand analysis during frequent stages of production, American Helix is able toproduce higher yields that reduce inefficient production cycles.

2. Quality Organization (Continued)

The proprietary primary process module increases the production yield by itsfully automated line. The primary process production line is fully automatedwith robotic systems. This reduces the amount of amount of risk normallyassociated with the human elements with regards to cleanliness.






Upon the receipt of the data tapes, the files are validated and inspected forpreparation of the premastering process.Upon the creation of the ISO 9660 files,the original data files are validated for 100% accuracy. This will insure therequired quality needed for the production of the Stamper.

Upon the creation of the stamper, the quality assurance team will again inspectthe quality and specifications of the stamper, again to insure the integrity of boththe physical characteristics and the integrity of the information. The stamper isfirst visually inspected for physical flaws ( See Quality Control for detailedprocedures). The Stamper is then analyzed with the Digital Intelligence SystemsCorporation SP-2 Stamper Analyzer. This validates the required specifications ofthe Sony/Phillips Red Book Standards (See Quality Control For Details).

Upon the production of a CD-ROM from the Primary Process module, the disc isinspected again both visually, and again analyzed by the AID System. The AIDSystem will analyze the disc for four main quality assurance categories:

BirefringenceInner Reflectivity & EccentricityOuter Reflectivity & EccentricityWarp Level

There are 4 main Reject Parameters:

Pinholes Missing DataDense FlawsTrack Flaws

Upon the validation of the first disc off of the primary process line, 100 % of alldiscs will be tested on the AID system. After the printing of the label on theSecondary process line, 100% of the discs will again be inspected under magnifiedlighting stations for printing flaws, and again for physical flaws on the reflectivediscs.

4.Demonstrated Performance to Fulfill Production of a Similar Nature - Address thecompanies production background including years of experience and keypersonnel and background by specialty; contracts for which similar work wasperformed, and current production capability.

American Helix Technology Corporation was founded in 1987. The state-of-the-art manufacturing facility was in operation in January of 1988. The facility was athird generation injection molding process (Primary Process) engineered and






design by David D. Dering.

4. Demonstrated Performance (Continued)

The Primary Process exhibits a unique monoline system. This state-of-the-artproduction process yields a superior disc through its higher performance inquality assurance and higher throughput or yield.

The facility is now currently processing over 70 different titles on a monthly basis.This type of production demands superior organizational and administrativeperformance as well as exceptional quality assurance standards and techniques.

The manufacturing facility has recently doubled its capacity and is currentlycapable of producing over 3.5 million CD's annually. Plans are currently beingfinalized to double the production capacity by year end which would result in thecapacity of over 7 million CD'S annually. These figures include end to endproduction of CD AUDIO or CD-ROM discs.

Similar work was performed for the following organizations:

AMP, Inc.

COMMODORE Business Machines

Arthur Anderson & Company

National Institute of Standards & Technology

5.Understanding of the Required Production Efforts - Demonstrate your understandingof the scope and extent of the requirement; access to CD-ROM standardsspecifications and ability to keep them current; demonstrate understanding ofthe functions required to create CD-ROMS from government furnished data;and describe the physical systems and facilities required to accomplish therequirements in the Statement of Work.

For a an illustration of the production processes that will utilized to accomplishthe Statement of Work see Exhibit A.

RECEIPT OF GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA & PRINTING MATERIALSUpon receipt of the Delivery Order and MC&G data, the media (9 Track Tape, 8MM Cartridge, WORM, or Magneto Optical Cartridges) the project order will beentered into the computer system. All corresponding project reports, and detailed






information regarding the specifications of that particular order will be loggedinto the system. This electronic database gives all departments throughout thefacility instantaneous access to all vital information. This information will containinventory management for all titles and all reorder titles. The current internalreporting system will fulfill the DMA requirement for all and any inventoryreporting that is requested.

5. Understanding of Production (Continued)

The input data files will be inspected for errors/compatibility/conformance to thestandard, and/or the specifications /requirements of the Delivery Order.The datafiles will then be prepared immediately for premastering. The DMA furnishedartwork will be inspected for printing/finishing errors andcompatibility/conformance standards identified in the Delivery Order. Alldiscrepancies shall be reported to the DMA utilizing the Data Discrepancyreporting format. The delivered artwork will immediately prepared to producethe respective printing screens for the disc labels. The required artwork for theinserts will also be prepared for printing. Upon acceptance of the proofs, theinserts will be produced.

PREMASTERING/MASTERINGThe TOPIX or Meridian Premastering System will be utilized to perform thepremastering and ISO 9660 imaging. After completion, the CD-ROM image willbe validated against the original data. Upon verification, the mastering processwill produce the metal stamper used for replication. The stamper will be verifiedby the quality assurance department, as described in detail in subsection 1, andprepared for the Primary Process, replication.

PRIMARY PROCESSThe Primary process equipment will be tooled and the stamper installed forreplication. After the clear disc is produced from the injection molding machine,it will move to the metallization chamber by way of robotics. The clear disc willbe coated with a thin layer of platinum. The disc is then transferred by robotics tothe UV (Ultraviolet) light station, which cures and hardens the disc. After theprocess is tweaked to its required performance, the CD-ROM will be inspectedand verified for the desired specifications. Upon approval, the primary processwill continue to produce the desired quantity.






AIDS INSPECTIONAfter the discs are produced, 100% of all product will be inspected by the AIDSystem Analyzer. Parameters will be measured against the specifiedspecifications, the Sony/Phillips Red Book, and Yellow Book Standards. SeeSubsection 1. for detailed description. Upon acceptance, all master discs/stampersand disc labeling stencils will be stored in the Stamper/Media vault (climatecontrolled).

SECONDARY PROCESSThe approved CD-ROMS will then be prepared for the Secondary Process, or discprinting. Using silk screen printing technology, the discs will be printed with therespective label artwork. This state-of-the-art technology will allow up to 5 colorprinting, and is also capable of process or picture printing.

SECONDARY PROCESS INSPECTIONAfter completion the CD-ROMS will be again be inspected. 100 % of all CD-ROMS will pass through an inspection station equipped with 200X powermagnifying devices. The CD-ROMS will be inspected for both Printing flaws, andagain for physical flaws on the reflective surface.

5. Understanding of Production (Continued)

Five CM&G CD-ROM discs shall be randomly selected and furnished to the DMAfor approval and acceptance as per all required specifications.

American Helix will provide written certification certifying that the discs meet orexceed the specified performance criteria, including a 100% correlation of thediscs of a byte by byte comparison of the CM&G source data to the premaster andthe master.

PACKAGING & FULFILLMENTAll approved CD-ROMS will be prepared for packaging. The inserts will beinserted into the jewel boxes in preparation for the packaging of the CD-ROMdiscs. After completion of the packaging of the CD-ROMS, the jewel boxes will bereadied for shrink wrapping. An automated shrink wrapping machine willautomatically wrap and heat the jewel box for the desired results.

The jewel boxes will be transferred to the shipping department for packing,labeling, and shipping.






Upon completion of the contract or sooner as requested by the DMA, AmericanHelix return all MC&G property. American Helix will certify that the property isreturned in its original condition.

All master stamper discs/stampers, and stencils shall be stored in a clean, andclimate controlled storage vault during the archiving period. At the end of thearchiving period, American Helix will destroy and provide the requiredcertification as prescribed by the Federal emissions criteria, the DMA, and anyother applicable requirements.






6. Technical Production Process - Describe your proposed process to include the taskincluding flow diagrams, total personnel by skill areas and skill level whichwill be devoted to the production functions, description of required equipmentto be devoted to production functions, and viable contingency plan forproduction backup.

Exhibit III,IV,& V illustrate flow diagrams for the 3 major production processesrequired to satisfy the requirements of "SECTION C -DESCRIPTION /SPECIFICATION / WORK STATEMENT" ATTACHMENT (2)". The enclosedEXHIBIT II, describes the organizational chart and defines the personnel by skillareas and skill level.

The following is a summary of the required equipment used in the production processes definedand described above:

CINCINNATI MILICRON PRIMARY PROCESS MODULECONVAC METALIZERADEPT ROBOTICS SYSTEMSDIGITAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION SP-2 STAMPER-ANALYZERCD-CATS SA2 CD ANALYZERAID SYSTEM ANALYZERSONY DMR 4000SONY RECORDERDUBUIT 3000NOVELL ETHERNET NETWORKDISC MANUFACTURING, INC., (FACILITY)OMI/TOPIX & MERIDIAN PREMASTERING SYSTEMZUMAS-XABITE/OMI BACKUP SYSTEMSAPLLE/MACII PLUS SSCI INTERFACEDMI MASTERING SYSTEMPHILLIPS UNIVERSAL MASTER GLASS SYSTEMPLAYER ANALYZERPOLYFORM ELECTRO-FORMING PLATING SYSTEM

A viable contingency plan for production backup is predicated on the availability on 3 majorresources:

1. Raw Materials2.Machinery & Equipment3.Labor






Raw Materials - American Helix purchases and stores quantities of raw materialsthat exhibit not only economies of scale, but also provide the facility in fullproduction for at least 2 months without interruption.

Machinery & Equipment - The facility features duplicate primary processequipment, and also secondary process equipment.

Labor - American Helix produces CD's 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. HighIndustries, Inc., also supports American Helix with an unlimited labor marketthroughout its temporary services company, High Employees.

MANAGEMENT: The management proposal shall include a description of themanagement and administrative organization available to be established for thesupervision, and assurance of expeditious and economical performance of the effortrequired under the proposed contract, including a sample work structure chart by jobclassification and code.The management proposal should include information concerning their experienceyour firm has had in performance of Government contracts for similar requirements ofthe variety and magnitude set forth in the RFP. This information should include dataas to the scope of work required under such contracts, the term of said contracts,number and types of personnel furnished, the procuring agencies contracted with,contract numbers, and other applicable information.

Further, it should address the factors listed below which are related to the evaluationcriteria set forth in Section M of the solicitation:

1.Management Plan - Address proposed plan to control production, posed manningand span of control, past performance, plan to satisfy required storage facilities,plan to implement production, plan to acquire additional personnel (ifrequired), and plan to maintain adequate supply of raw materials.

2.Management Organization - Depict organizational structure including a descriptionof each organizational component; address background experience of keymanagement personnel, and corporate mission statement.

The management and administrative organization is illustrated in EXHIBIT VI"ORGANIZATIONAL CHART".

American Helix has recently been awarded a contract with the National Instituteof Standards and Technology for the premastering, mastering, and replication ofCD-ROMS. The contract extends for a period of one year.






American Helix currently produces more than 75 CD manufacturing projects permonth. It has demonstrated its ability to provide on time delivery of its quickturn production runs with a commitment for quality.

Its manufacturing facility contains over 20,000 square feet, and has an additional20,000 square feet for expansion. It currently contains a 1,000 square foot tape andmaster vault for client medium storage.

The following is the scope of responsibilities for the respective job classifications:

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/RECEPTIONIST - Under the supervision of thePresident/Vice President, the Executive Secretary/Receptionist will have theresponsibility of directing all telephone activity, and providing any clerical workrequired by executive management, to include typing, FAX communications,general office work, special projects, developing the executive calendar, travelarrangements, filing, time card and employee benefits processing, American Helixliaison to High Industries, and performing data entry as required.

2. Management Organization (Continued)

DIRECTOR OF OPTICAL PUBLISHING (DOP) - Under the direction of the President,the DOP will be responsible for developing and growing the business activities ofthe optical publishing business, including CD-ROM Premastering, Mastering, andReplication; CD-ROM Project Development; Data Conversions; and InformationTechnologies. The DOP will be responsible for coordinating, scheduling, and thesupervision of all activities. The POP will also be responsible for projectmanagement duties of the respective activities. The DOP will coordinate alltransactions with Disc Manufacturing Inc., for the Mastering services required forCD-ROM replication.

SALES COORDINATOR PROFESSIONAL AUDIO PRODUCTS - Working directlywith the Vice President and Director of Sales and Marketing, this position isresponsible for the daily administration of all sales, marketing and advertisingcorrespondence and maintenance of sales files. Also has the responsibility toprovide current and prospective customers with information.

DIRECTOR OF SALES/MARKETING/PROFESSIONAL AUDIO PRODUCTS-Working directly with the Vice President, this position is responsible for the dailysale and marketing planning and maintenance of all in-house CD audio and






cassette accounts.

QUALITY CONTROL TECHNICIAN (QTC) - Under the supervision of the VicePresident, the QCT is responsible for the daily quality inspection and Reportingrelative to American Helix products and services. Specifically theseresponsibilities include but are not limited to the testing, installation andregularly scheduled maintenance of the "QC" lab and plant inspection material.

On a daily basis the QCT must track the timely arrival and assure the quality of incomingclient Master Tapes, CD-AUDIO & CD-ROM Stampers, and finished goods. Inconjunction with these daily responsibilities the QCT must alert the VicePresident, Director of Optical Publishing, and Production staff concerningquestionable product and source material quality.

PRODUCTION CONTROL MANAGER (PCM) - Under the supervision of the VicePresident, the PCM is responsible for efficient and accurate communication withcustomers, the daily scheduling and expediting of production, and the shippingand receiving of finished goods and materials.

CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CRS) - Under the supervision of theProduction Control Manager, the CSR is responsible for the efficient and accurateprocessing of customer orders, from receipt of parts through shipment ofcompleted product.

ENGINEERING MANAGER (EM) - Under the direction of the President, theEngineering Manager will be responsible of over-all Plant and ManufacturingSystem Engineering. Prioruty responsibility being the efficient, cost effective,operation, preventative maintenance, training, repair, product quality, and up-time management of the Primary Process.


SUPPORT SYSTEMS MANAGER (SSM) - Under the direction of the EngineeringManager, the SSM will be responsible for the installation, start-up andmaintenance, of all utility systems in the facility, as well as the general set-up, andmaintenance of secondary equipment, and assist the EM with Primary Equipmentas needed, and the care of the interior of the physical plant.

PRIMARY PROCESS ENGINEER (PPE) - Under the direction of the EngineeringManager, the Primary Process Engineer will be responsible for the daily up-time,efficiency, and quality production of all American Helix Compact Discs producedin the Primary Process.






MANUFACTURING MANAGER (MM) - Under the direction of the President, theManufacturing Manager will be responsible for the over-all product quality, (as itrelates to secondary operations which include spin coating, printing andpackaging) timely manufacturing of product as outlined by the Master schedule,technical processing and machine operations involved in the secondaryoperations, as well as general plant safety, personnel, training, and customersupport functions as needed.

ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER (AM) - Under the direction of the President, theAdministrative manager will be responsible for the communications betweenAmerican Helix and High Industries, Inc., in the areas of accounts payable,accounts receivable, invoicing, credit and collections, purchasing, general finance,pricing analysis, general analysis in assisting management in marketing andmanufacturing decisions, personnel and human resources issues that interfacewith High Industries, Inc., assisting with the development and administration ofcorporate policy internal the America Helix and as required with high Industries,Inc., key role in the development of annual budgets, and general American Helixmanagement.

VICE PRESIDENT - Under the direction of the President, the Vice President will beresponsible for the daily sales and marketing activities, daily quality controlefforts, and the reproduction order processing. The Vice President will beresponsible for performance reports on the respective accountability activities.

QUALITY CONTROL/PREMASTERING TECHNICIAN

ORDER PROCESSING CLERK (OPC) - Under the supervision of the Production ControlManager, the OPC will be responsible for the data entry, logging, and reporting ofall related information of new orders and reorders. The OPC will be responsiblefor communicating with clients and customers concerning discrepancies ininformation and insufficient reproduction materials.

SHIPPING & RECEIVING CLERK (SRC) - Under the supervision of the ProductionControl Manager, the SRC will be responsible for the daily shipping and receivingactivities of the company. The SRC will be accountable for all customer productsthat are received from the Packaging/Inspection stations. The SRC will also beaccountable for processing the receiving of customer printed materials.







PRIMARY PROCESS TECHNICIAN (PPT) - Under the supervision of the EngineeringManager, the PPT will be responsible for the daily operations of the primaryprocesses, injection molding, operations. These responsibilities include preparingthe stamper for production, supervising the injection molding operation,metalizing operation, and the ultraviolet process.

AP/AR/CREDIT/PURCHASING CLERK (AACPC) - Under the supervision of theAdministrative Manager, the AACPC will be responsible for the processing ofAccounts Receivables, Accounts Payables, Credit and Collections, andPurchasing. The AACPC will be also be the liaison with High Industries, Inc.,accounting department.

INVOICING/SALES ORDERS (ISO) - Under the supervision of the AdministrativeManager, the ISO will be responsible for the processing of all Invoices and SalesOrders. These responsibilities will include communicating with the OrderProcessing department to verify and confirm all customer, production, andshipping information as it relates to billing activities.

PRINTING TECHNICIAN - Under the supervision of the Manufacturing Manager, thePrinting Technician will be responsible for the daily operation of the SecondaryProcess, Printing Process. The Printing Technician will be accountable for thequality and performance of the process, as well as keeping to the Master Schedule.

SCREEN TECHNICIAN - Under the supervision of the Manufacturing Manager,the Screen Technician will be responsible for the production of all printing screensrequired for the Secondary Process. This will include quality control standards.The Screen Technician will also be required for the production, maintenance, andinventory of all inks and color substances.

PACKAGING SUPERVISOR - Under the supervision of the Manufacturing Manager,Packaging Supervisor will be responsible for the daily activities of the PackagingInspectors. These responsibilities will include supervisory functions, schedulingcommitments, quality assurance standards, and inventory management of allcustomer provided materials.

PACKAGING INSPECTORS - Under the supervision of the Packaging Supervisor andthe Manufacturing Manager, the Packaging Inspectors will be responsible for allpackaging requirements of CD products. The Packaging Inspectors will also beresponsible for the Secondary Process Inspection and Quality Assurance






procedures.


BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL:

DAVID D. DERING, PRESIDENT - Accumulated more than 15 years experience as anengineer in injection molding technology. Previously was director of operationsfor MXL Industries, a manufacturer of custom optical lenses. In the past hedeveloped, designed and produced products for the Navy and Aerospaceindustry. Designed and developed the injection molding module of the CDmanufacturing processes, and manufacturing facility at large.

Mr. Dering has a Patent Pending on the CD manufacturing process and is currentlyfinalizing agreements with Cincinnati Milicron to market the modules for theindustry at large.

JAMES BOYER, VICE PRESIDENT - Established himself as one of the leading audioengineers over a career that spanned 20 years. Demonstrated an in depthknowledge and expertise for audio and video engineering, production, andrecording. Produced the first commercially released CD-AUDIO, for Billy Joel.Developed a list of Who's Who in contemporary music as clients for hisengineering and recording business.

Provides a diverse range of technical expertise in the development of multimediaoptical publishing projects, including CD-ROM multimedia.

AL THORNBURG, ENGINEERING MANAGER - Developed a strong background inmanufacturing and process engineering with DIGITAL AUDIO DISCCORPORATION, a subsidiary of SONY. SONY was instrumental in developingthe CD technology. Contributes an in depth working knowledge of injectionmolding equipment and processes used in the manufacturing environment of CD-AUDIO and CD-ROM. Prior to working with SONY for 6 years, employed as amanufacturing engineering specialist for RCA Corporation.

MIKE DILLINGHAM, PRODUCTION CONTROL MANAGER - Acquired 13 years ofexperience in the distribution and production areas of the recording industry.Prior to American Helix, managed the distribution and warehousing efforts ofELECTROSOUND GROUP, INC., a national recording company. Mike alsoserved in similar capacities with ASR and POLYGRAM recording companies.






JOE LIANTONIO, QUALITY CONTROL TECHNICIAN, SYSTEMS ANALYST -Previously employed by FERRANTI DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC., an InternationalDefense Contractor, as a systems engineer. Performed various engineering andtesting functions for hardware, software and integrated systems for radar andtracking systems. Experienced technical writer with working knowledge ofmilitary specifications. Responsible for performing and analyzing postproduction Acceptance Testing for final production approval for variousproducts.


DAVE SHIRK, QC/PREMASTERING TECHNICIAN - Previously was employed byMcCure Audio and Visual Recording Inc. serving in various production andengineering capacities. Also contains a working experience of electronicengineering. Experienced in analyzing and inspecting recorded media forspecifications and bench mark analysis for quality assurance standards.

BETH ELLER, MANUFACTURING ENGINEER - Employed in the in the injectionmolding industry for the last 12 years. Developed systems for the finishing,polishing, and coating technologies in injection molding applications. Beth isresponsible for the state-of-the-art printing processes employed for the CD discmanufacturing.

GLEAN GALLANT, PRIMARY PROCESS TECHNICIAN - Performed variousengineering duties and responsibilities in the injection molding industry duringthe last 10 years. Contributed to the design of the primary process module andwas instrumental in building the manufacturing systems for American Helix.Provides an in depth expertise to the production and manufacturing equipment,systems, and operations of the Primary Process.

STAN CATERBONE, DIRECTOR, OPTICAL PUBLISHING -Developed the CD-ROMbusiness for American Helix/Advanced Media Group, LTD.,. Previousbackground in computer technologies. Former founder and principal of aFinancial Services organization, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD.,raising over $80 million of capital per year. Designed and developed state-of-the-art information technology systems for the company. Combines a developedsense of entrepreneurial spirit with past education, training, and experience ofcomputer and information technologies.

TOM BROWN, OPTICAL PUBLISHING SOFTWARE/SYSTEMS ENGINEER






(RETAINED BY AMERICAN HELIX) - Developed over 50 CD-ROM projectssince 1987. Has been authoring commercial software over the past 8 years,including projects with UNISYS and NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR. Wasmanager of SHAPE OPTIMEDIA CD-ROM division. Authored CD-DIAGNOSTICS, a software program for installing and maintaining CD-ROMdrives.

MALCOM LANGLEY (ESSCOMP), SOFTWARE DEVELOPER -Designed and developed a full text retrieval engine that is on the leading edge oftechnology in relation to current performance standards. This engine wasdeveloped to handle CD ROM size databases (670 megabytes or larger). Thephilosophy behind the technology is simple, the data is compressed onto the CDROM disk and then it is decompressed in the PC's memory before displaying tothe screen.

Mr. Langley has been actively involved with computers since 1974, starting withself-assembled (6800, 8080 and Z80 CPU) systems. He has also been involved withelectronics since his childhood, including 2 years with the Army Signal Corpsdoing radio and teletype repair. As a hobbyist - amateur radio, TV repair, andcalibration laboratory.


Programmed the software and maintained the systems to do invoicing, accountsreceivable, general ledger and historical analysis for Association of MarylandPilots using proprietary Prodigy Systems software. The systems processed 4,000to 8,000 ships annually and $8 to $14 million in revenue.

WAYNE LANDIS, SYSTEMS ENGINEER (ESSCOMP) - Over 7 years experience withNaval supply and procurement Automated Data Processing (ADP) systemsdesign, implementation, operations and supervision. This position was in theinformation center providing support to 435 end users with a 1.4 billion dollarbudget and over 72,000 contracts per year.

Developed a database and then produced 95,000 barcoded labels. Developed aplan to backfit the procurement folders with the barcoded labels. Designed atracking and barcode wand update system, via 3270 input into the IBM 3090/600mainframe computer. This system utilized mainframe FOCUS for data captureand storage with nightly update of the Navy IDMS master database.






Over 5 years on the BREAKOUT/COMPETITION ADVOCATE PROGRAM.Developed the BREAKOUT HIT LIST. This list provides vendors with the partsthe Navy has procured over the last five years (with quantity and the last pricepayed) divided by sole source or full competitive items.

Developed the Competition advocate picture catalog. This book provides apicture of items that the government has problems finding vendors to produce.(Some reasons are the specification are written in military jargon or the drawing isnot available.) The driving factor of the catalog is to find a vender to reverseengineer the part. Developed and implemented the BREAKOUT tracking system of the 10,000 itemsreviewed yearly.

Worked with PARTMASTER (NSA) to develop CD-ROM application with12,500,000 part number/military number cross reference. Any item is crossed anddisplayed on the screen of an 8088 type PC in less than 6 seconds.

Beta test site for IBM 3363 WORM drive. This involved 9 months of optical diskimage storage and retrieval systems testing with 50% increase in data transferspeed. Developed the Navy color picture database of parts.

Worked for Advanced Technology Inc. as a Senior System Analyst and ran theCamp Hill satellite office. Provided support on the LM2500 Marine Gas TurbineProject. Developed a database to track all serial numbered gas turbines and which shipthey were installed on. This database was then used to schedule ECP andoverhaul schedules.

Bid four major RFP's on the BREAKOUT program each proposal had two teamingpartners.

CORPORATE MISSION STATEMENT - TO ESTABLISH AMERICAN HELIXAS A HIGH QUALITY, FULL SERVICE, PRODUCTION FACILITY IN THECOMPACT DISC MARKETPLACE.

TO PROVIDE VALUE ADDED SERVICES TO OUR CLIENTS BY MEANS OFAPPLICATION AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING.

TO HELP FACILITATE THE GROWTH OF THE OPTICAL PUBLISHINGINDUSTRY BY PROVIDING SUPERIOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE






PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AT FAIR MARKET PRICES FOR THEMARKETPLACE AT LARGE.






Trump needs to make heads roll at the CIA and FBI | New York Post http://nypost.com/2016/11/12/trump-needs-to-make-heads-roll-at-the-cia...

1 of 2 11/14/2016 7:01 AM






Recommended by

✔

✔

✔

✔

Trump needs to make heads roll at the CIA and FBI | New York Post http://nypost.com/2016/11/12/trump-needs-to-make-heads-roll-at-the-cia...

2 of 2 11/14/2016 7:01 AM






Donald Trump May Select an Architect of Bush’s Torture Program to R... https://theintercept.com/2016/11/11/trump-cia-torture/

1 of 6 11/14/2016 7:07 AM







2 of 6 11/14/2016 7:07 AM







3 of 6 11/14/2016 7:07 AM







4 of 6 11/14/2016 7:07 AM







5 of 6 11/14/2016 7:07 AM






CHAPTERDIVIDER






1

In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom

CIA “no touch” torture makes sense

out of mind control allegations

By Cheryl Welsh

January 2008

Cheryl Welsh was invited to speak about mind control allegations at a recent

workshop on ethics and interrogations by the workshop director, Jean Maria Arrigo PhD.

Dr. Arrigo commented on this article:

In “CIA ‘No Touch’ Torture Makes Sense Out of Mind Control Allegations,”

Cheryl Welsh provides a valuable overview of methods common to

neuroweapons research and torture interrogation. Her essay is informed by

the multitude of self-identified, experimental targets of neuroweapons

researchers whom she represents. Scholars and journalists who are only able

to track neuroweapons research and interrogation methods through

government documents have biased the consensus reality in favor of

government authorities who deceive the public. We owe thanks to Cheryl

Welsh and her colleagues for their pioneering efforts to penetrate government

deception through the phenomenology of self-identified victims of

neuroweapons.

Jean Maria Arrigo, PhD, is an independent social psychologist and oral historian whose

work gives moral voice to military and intelligence professionals. See, for example,

Arrigo, J.M & Wagner, R. (2007). “Torture Is for Amateurs”: A Meeting of Psychologists

and Military Interrogators. [Special issue]. Peace and Conflict, 11 (4).

Dedicated to the courageous and kind-hearted

Peggy Fagan of Houston, Texas,

who is enduring the new scientific version of torture.






2

Table of contents

Introduction

I. A university professor uncovers CIA “no touch” torture

II. The beginnings of CIA “no touch” torture and how it spread

III. What is “no touch” torture?

IV. An example of “no touch” torture

V. The long history of U.S. torture

VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control research

VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research

VIII. Why CIA “no touch” torture has been so successful

IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing the enemy

without killing; for intelligence operations and counterinsurgency

warfare

X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW, (prisoner of war),

a Soviet political prisoner and Abu Ghraib detainees

XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of “no touch” torture

XII. The three key behavioral components of “no touch” torture

XIII. Torture as “a kind of total theater”

XIV. A comparison of “no touch” torture to mind control allegations

XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation

XVI. Comparing “no touch” torture techniques of sensory disorientation

and self inflicted pain to mind control allegations

XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on






3

Introduction

After the horrific pictures of prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib were displayed in front pages of

newspapers around the world, the United States maintained that the U.S. government does not

torture; Abu Ghraib was about a few bad officers. Evidence now proves that CIA “no touch” torture

and worse were ordered by the executive branch and approved by top military officers. Surprisingly

this scandal has much in common with another national security issue, neuroweapons, commonly

referred to as mind control.

The field of neuroethics should begin now, according to bioethicist Dr. Jonathan Moreno in his 2006

book Mind Wars, Brain Research and National Defense. The influential book was reviewed in

Nature and JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association). Most neuroscientists agree that

advanced neuroweapons are over a half century away but the ethics of the new weapons need more

planning than occurred for the atomic bomb. Moreno began the first chapter of his book describing

the growing numbers of allegations of illegal government mind control targeting. He immediately

dismissed them as conspiracy theory nut cases. A 2007 Washington Post Magazine article,

“Thought Wars” followed suit. So why should anyone read further given these credible and highly

respected expert opinions?

Much of what the public should know about the issue has gone unreported or uninvestigated. For

example, after over a half century of classified research, not one publicly known neurological weapon

has been deployed. This raises more questions than it answers. Putting aside the major and

undebated points of the consensus position, the mind control allegations do sound crazy and on this

singular point, most people, including experts and news reporters refuse any closer examination.

Clearly, understanding why the mind control allegations sound so crazy would have significant

consequences.

Two analogies help clarify the major problems for the mind control issue, secrecy and the lack of a

thorough, impartial investigation;

Excerpt of a 1970s congressional hearing uncovering illegal CIA activities; [Senator Frank]

Church, ... persisted in blaming the plots [assassinations] on the CIA. The agency, he said, was

a “rogue elephant on a rampage.” For proof, he pointed to the lack of documentary evidence

that any president had ever approved an assassination. Former CIA director Richard Helms

countered that it was absurd to expect to find such evidence. “I can’t imagine anybody wanting

something in writing saying I have just charged Mr. Jones to go out and shoot Mr. Smith,” he

testified. The Agency, he insisted, had simply carried out the wishes of the executive.

Even today, experts don’t understand how the U.S. secrecy system works. Similar to the torture

scandal, until there is a national security scandal about neuroscience weapons, the public will

remain uninformed about a serious public issue.

During a dairyman’s strike in 19th century New England, when there was suspicion of milk

being watered down, Henry David Thoreau wrote; “Sometimes circumstantial evidence can be

quite convincing; like when you find a trout in the milk.” Mind Wars and the Washington Post

Magazine article examined the growing numbers of crazy sounding mind control allegations.






4

But unlike Thoreau’s account, the publications only reported the convincing circumstantial

evidence of “finding a trout in the milk” and dismissed the suspicions without a fair or

impartial investigation. As a result, the mind control allegations made no sense.

Update: In the 2008 book “The Commission, the Uncensored History of the 9-11 Investigation,”

Philip Shenon explained that explicit, very classified “kill orders” are now put in writing. On page

254 Shenon wrote: “MONs [memorandum of notification] were top-secret orders prepared by the

White House to authorize covert operations abroad by the CIA. ... there was an explicit, if highly

secret, order given by Clinton to the CIA in late 1998 to kill bin Laden.”

I. A university professor uncovers CIA “no touch”

torture

University of Wisconsin professor Alfred McCoy wrote the 2006 book, A Question of Torture, CIA

Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. It’s a compelling account of McCoy’s search

for understanding the CIA’s “no touch” torture techniques used in the war on terror and the Iraq

War. McCoy shows how “information extracted by coercion is worthless” and makes the case for a

legal approach, “long and successfully used by the U.S. Marines and the F.B.I.” McCoy documents

why CIA “no touch” torture is a “revolutionary psychological approach” and is the first new scientific

innovation after centuries of torture. “Interrogators had found that mere physical pain, no matter

how extreme, often produced heightened resistance.” Of course, the old brutal forms of physical

torture are still around, for example torture in Argentina in the 1970s described in the classic,

Prisoner Without a Name, Cell without a Number by Jacobo Timerman.

McCoy pieced together what “no touch” torture is and how it was spread globally. The CIA’s new “no

touch” torture works by attacking and destroying the basis of personal identity. McCoy found that

the techniques were bizarre, simple, even banal and yet devastatingly effective. McCoy discovered

that the techniques had been scientifically proven in decades of CIA cold war research. Evidence of

several government manuals helped prove that the techniques were disseminated “from Vietnam

through Iran to Central America.”

“No touch” torture techniques sound strangely similar to mind control allegations. A comparison of

“no touch” torture to mind control allegations raised the possibility that mind control allegations

could be based on the well researched psychological theory for “no touch” torture. Torture victims

exhibit symptoms similar to psychotic processes and organic disorders and experts say this is not

mental illness but an outcome of the psychological component of torture. Psychotherapist Otto

Doerr-Zegers, who has treated Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet stated; “

The psychological component of torture becomes a kind of total theater, a constructed unreality of

lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably with the victim’s self-betrayal and destruction. ...”

This is similar to the technique of “street theater” that mind control victims described in the

Washington Post Magazine article. As torture victims are not mentally ill, mind control victims

would not be mentally ill but rather have undergone and are undergoing a traumatic situation

comparable to torture, such as the alleged illegal targeting with government mind control weapons.






5

The UCDavis Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas (CSHRA) and the UCDavis

Center for Mind and Brain (CMB) further explain what psychological torture is and its effects on

torture victims.

[CSHRA and CMB] have initiated a collaboration to investigate theneurobiology of

psychological torture. ...Psychological torture (henceforthPT) is a set of practices that are

used worldwide to inflict pain or suffering without resorting to direct physical violence.

PT includes the use of sleep deprivation, sensory disorientation, forced self-induced pain,

solitary confinement, mock execution, severe humiliation, mind-altering drugs and

threats of violence—as well as the exploitation of personal or cultural phobias.

The psychiatric sequelae of PT are severe. They include delirium, psychosis, regression,

self-mutilation, cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic

stress disorder. Neuroscience research on these and related mental disorders continues

to establish their neurobiological underpinnings, thus challenging the popular view that

PT is not physical, not serious, and perhaps not even torture at all.

The CSHRA and the CMB launched their collaborative efforts by holding The First

UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of Psychological Torture. The goal of this

workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners from different specialties

and research groups in order to set off a unified, long-term, research program on the

ways in which PT affects the human central nervous system in an effort to understand it

in relation to the more traditional forms of physical torture, and to establish clearly

articulated ethical, legal, and medical descriptions of this set of practices. It is expected

that these descriptions will help treat, document, and deter PT.

Supplemented by studies on the social, historical, and ethical ramifications of PT, the

presentations made at The First UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of

Psychological Torture have been bound into The Trauma of Psychological Torture, a

volume to be published by Praeger on June 30, 2008.

Please note that numerous torture experts, including CSHRA and CMB have completely shunned

suggestions to investigate mind control allegations or to consider the issue. But this information may

be helpful to the therapists of TIs (targeted individuals of mind control) who are coping with mind

control targeting.






6

II. The beginnings of CIA “no touch” torture and how it

spread

The science of psychological torture began because of fears of Russian brainwashing of defendants in

the 1940s Moscow show trials and the Korean War POW (prisoners of war) brainwashing scare in

the 1950s. The 2005 book, World as Laboratory, Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men by

Rebecca Lemov described government psychological research for determining whether the

Communists had developed new techniques of brainwashing. “Almost all [scientists] who were

assigned to study the phenomenon of POW collaboration ended up in short order working for the

CIA via one of its various ‘cut-outs,’ conduits, and false fronts, such as the Society for the

Investigation of Human Ecology, the Geschickter Fund for Medical Research, and the Scientific

Engineering Institute, or in one of its own laboratories.” (Lemov, 219) McCoy described the research

behind “no touch” torture and how it spread globally;

From 1950 to 1962, the CIA became involved in torture through a massive mind-control

effort, with psychological warfare and secret research into human consciousness that

reached a cost of a billion dollars annually, a veritable Manhattan Project of the mind. ...

If we trace a narrative thread through a maze of hundreds of experiments, the CIA

research moved through two distinct phases, first an in-house exploration of exotic

techniques such as hypnosis and hallucinogenic drugs, and, a later focus on behavioral

experimentation by contract researchers, several of the most brilliant behavioral

scientists of their generation ...

While this Agency drug testing led nowhere, CIA-funded behavioral experiments,

outsourced to the country’s leading universities, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc., produced

three key findings that contributed to the discovery of a new form of torture that was

psychological, not physical, ... perhaps best described as “no-touch torture.” (McCoy

outline, 2)

Across the span of three continents and four decades, there is a striking similarity in U.S.

torture techniques, both their conceptual design and specific techniques, from the CIA’s

1963 Kubark interrogation manual, to the Agency’s 1983 Honduras training handbook,

all the way to General Ricardo Sanchez’s 2003 orders for interrogation in Iraq. ...

Guantanamo perfected the three-phase psychological paradigm by attacking cultural

identity and individual psyche. (McCoy outline, 14)






7

III. What is “no touch” torture?

McCoy explained what “no touch” torture is;

The CIA’s psychological paradigm for “no touch” torture fused two new methods,

“sensory disorientation” and “self-inflicted pain,” whose combination, in theory, would

cause victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily

to their torturers. Refined through years of practice, sensory disorientation relies on a

mix of sensory overload and sensory deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then

intense interrogation, heat and cold, light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic

attack on all human stimuli. The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation

and self-inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum

is a hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 4-5)

In 2004, the Red Cross reported: “The construction of such a system. ... cannot be

considered other than an intentional system of cruel, unusual and degrading treatment

and a form of torture.” (McCoy outline, 9)

IV. An example of “no touch” torture

Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman interviewed journalist Jane Mayer about her August 8, 2007 New

Yorker article, “The Black Sites: A Rare Look Inside the C.I.A.’s Secret Interrogation Program.”

Mayer described detainee Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his experience with “no touch” torture;

There, he [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] was subjected to a kind of a weird routine that

someone described to me as kind of Clockwork Orange sort of thing, where he was put in

goggles that blacked out the light and earmuffs of some sort that blocked out sound and

deprived of any normal routine, such as meals or anything that would allow him to know

what time of day it was or really have any kind of marker in his existence. And it’s a

program that’s developed of sort of psychological terror, in a way, to kind of make people

feel that they are completely dependent on other people, have no control over their lives,

and it’s something that, the technique, that really comes out of the KGB days, way back in

the Cold War. And apparently it’s something the CIA has put a lot of research into over

time.






8

V. The long history of U.S. torture

The history of CIA torture runs parallel to CIA neuroscience-based mind control research and also

CIA nonlethal weapons research. This is important because mind control allegations include

descriptions of techniques that sound like all three CIA programs. It is possible that the related cold

war CIA “no touch” torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control programs have

co-mingled for intelligence purposes. Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter and author

Tim Weiner wrote the 2007 book Legacy of Ashes, History of the CIA. Weiner described the CIA

torture programs and the U.S. secret detention centers around the world. This is a brief excerpt of

the extensive programs;

The project dated back to 1948, when Richard Helms and his [American intelligence]

officers in Germany realized they were being defrauded ... The agency had set up

clandestine prisons to wring confessions out of suspected double agents. One was in

Germany, another in Japan. The third, and the biggest, was in the Panama Canal Zone.

“Like Guantanamo, ... It was anything goes.” ... (Weiner, 64-5)

Senior CIA officers, including Helms, destroyed almost all the records of these programs

in fear they might become public. (Weiner, 66)

The agency, as Cheney said that morning, went over to “the dark side.” On Monday,

September 17, President Bush issued a fourteen-page top secret directive to Tenet and

the CIA, ordering the agency to hunt, capture, imprison, and interrogate suspects around

the world. It set new limits on what the agency could do. It was the foundation for a

system of secret prisons where CIA officers and contractors used techniques that

included torture. One CIA contractor was convicted of beating an Afghan prison to death.

This was not the role of a civilian intelligence service in a democratic society. But it is

clearly what the White House wanted the CIA to do. ...

[The CIA] had participated in the torture of captured enemy combatants before,

beginning in 1967, under the Phoenix program in Vietnam. ...

Under Bush’s order, the CIA began to function as a global military police, throwing

hundreds of suspects into secret jails in Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, and inside the

American military prison in Guantanamo, Cuba. It handed hundreds more prisoners off

to the intelligence services in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, and Syria for interrogations.

(Weiner, 482)






9

VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control

research

Some CIA neuroscience-based mind control research is known to have continued into the 1970s and

is still classified today. A January 29, 1979 Washington Post article entitled “Book Disputes CIA

Chief on Mind-Control Efforts: Work Went on Into 1970s, Author Says,” reported;

Despite assurances last year from Central Intelligence Director Stansfield Turner that the

CIA’s mind-control program was phased out over a decade ago, the intelligence agency

has come up with new documents indicating that the work went on into the 1970s,

according to a new book. John Marks, the author of the book, said the CIA mind-control

researchers did apparently drop their much publicized MK-ULTRA drug-testing

program. But they replaced it, according to Marks, with another super secret behavioral-

control project under the agency’s Office of Research and Development.

The ORD program used a cover organization set up in the 1960s outside Boston headed

by Dr. Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid, who acted as a “figurehead,” said Marks in

his book. The project investigated such research as genetic engineering, development of

new strains of bacteria, and mind control. The book identifies the Massachusetts

proprietary organization headed by Land as the Scientific Engineering Institute. The

CIA-funded institute was originally set up as a radar and technical research company in

the 1950s and shifted over to mind-control experiments in the 1960s with the exception

of a few scattered programs. According to Marks, however, the ORD program was a full-

scale one and just as secret as the earlier MK-ULTRA project.

In a March 14, 1987, Nation magazine editorial, Louis Slesin, editor of the trade publication,

Microwave News, wrote; “Experts agree that nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) can

affect behavior, but the question is whether the radiation can be harnessed and used on people at a

distance. With its MKULTRA program the CIA began looking for the answer in the early 1950s.”

Slesin described that in the 1979 book, “Search for the Manchurian Candidate, The CIA and Mind

Control” by John Marks, Marks filed a freedom of information act (foia) request. The CIA replied

that “it had a roomful of files on electromagnetic and related techniques to alter behavior and

stimulate the brain.” But, “[the agency] refused to release the papers, and they remain classified.”






10

VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research

Nonlethal weapons are another outcome of CIA behavior control research. Steven Aftergood wrote

about the initial stages of nonlethal weapons in the September/October 1994 Bulletin of the Atomic

Scientists; “Details about programs to develop so called ‘non-lethal’ weapons are slowly emerging

from the U.S. government’s secret ‘black budget.’ ... The concept of non-lethal weapons is not new;

the term appears in heavily censored CIA documents dating from the 1960s.” Dr. Barbara Hatch-

Rosenberg described nonlethal weapons on page 45,

“Non-lethal” weapons may violate treaties

Development of many of the proposed weapons described on these pages has been

undertaken by NATO, the United States, and probably other nations as well. Most of the

weapons could be considered “pre-lethal” rather than non-lethal. They would actually

provide a continuum of effects ranging from mild to lethal, with varying degrees of

controllability. Serious questions arise about the legality of these expensive and highly

classified development programs. Four international treaties are particularly relevant ...

The Certain Conventional Weapons Convention (also known as the Inhumane Weapons

Convention).

Many of the non-lethal weapons under consideration utilize infrasound or

electromagnetic energy (including lasers, microwave or radio-frequency radiation, or

visible light pulsed at brain-wave frequency) for their effects. These weapons are said to

cause temporary or permanent blinding, interference with mental processes,

modification of behavior and emotional response, seizures, severe pain, dizziness, nausea

and diarrhea, or disruption of internal organ functions in various other ways. In addition,

the use of high-power microwaves to melt down electronic systems would incidentally

cook every person in the vicinity.

Typically, the biological effects of these weapons depend on a number of variables that,

theoretically, could be tuned to control the severity of the effects. However, the precision

of control is questionable. The use of such weapons for law enforcement might constitute

severe bodily punishment without due process. In warfare, the use of these weapons in a

non-lethal mode would be analogous to the use of riot control agents in the Vietnam War,

a practice now outlawed by the CWC. Regardless of the level of injury inflicted, the use of

many non-lethal weapons is likely to violate international humanitarian law on the basis

of superfluous suffering and/or indiscriminate effects.

In addition, under the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention, international

discussions are now under way that may lead to the development of specific new

protocols covering electromagnetic weapons; a report is expected sometime next year.

The current surge of interest in electromagnetic and similar technologies makes the

adoption of a protocol explicitly outlawing the use of these dehumanizing weapons an

urgent matter.






11

VIII. Why CIA “no touch” torture has been so successful

McCoy explained;

CIA Paradigm: In its clandestine journey across continents and decades, this distinctly

American form of psychological torture would prove elusive, resilient, adaptable and

devastatingly destructive, attributes that have allowed it to persist up to the present and

into the future. ...

1. Elusive: Unlike its physical variant, psychological torture lacks clear signs of abuse

and easily eludes detection, greatly complicating any investigation, prosecution, or

attempt at prohibition.

2. Resilient: Psychological torture is shrouded in a scientific patina that appeals to

policy makers and avoids the obvious physical brutality unpalatable to the modern

public.

3. Adaptable: In forty years since its discovery, the Agency’s psychological paradigm

has proved surprisingly adaptable, with each sustained application producing

innovations. ...

4. Destructive: Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods, the CIA’s “no

touch” torture actually leaves searing psychological scars. Victims often need long

treatment to recover from a trauma many experts consider more crippling than

physical pain. (A Question of Torture, 12)

These characteristics also apply to nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control. All

three are emerging state tools of the future and can neutralize the enemy by controlling the behavior

of the enemy. A 2005 book entitled, Torture, Does it Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK? was co-

published with Human Rights Watch. Some general reasons for why governments use torture as a

state tool include the following. Governments torture because it is a way to obtain coerced

confessions. The confessions can be used for propaganda purposes. Torture serves a variety of state

purposes: “to terrorize certain elements of the population, to instill a climate of fear in the public

more generally, and to break key leaders and members of these groups, uncovering their networks.”

Other purposes of torture are to “obtain intelligence by any means,” “annihilate subversives” and

“eliminate the enemy.”

Counterinsurgency warfare is taking place in Iraq and major newspapers have reported on the many

detainees that have consistently alleged being subjected to “no touch” torture techniques. As

reported in the September 16th, 2007 Sacramento Bee, General David Petraeus co-wrote the

Counterinsurgency Field Manuel-U.S. Army Field Manual on Tactics, Intelligence, Host Nation

Forces, Airpower, which Newsweek said, is “highly touted as the basis upon which the surge of U.S.

forces this year would be organized.”






12

The book Torture, also included a description of “counterinsurgency warfare, in which torture was a

principal weapon” and was developed “during the French experience in Indochina and Algeria.”

[The] “genesis of this new kind of warfare is the idea that the enemy takes the form of an

invisible political organization hidden among the civilian population. One can know its

leaders and its structure only by waging a war of information: by arresting masses of

civilian suspects, interrogating them, and, if necessary, torturing them. ... In the modern

era, ... the science of torture and similar abusive treatment has developed to break the

physical and mental resistance of subjects before they expire or go mad and thus become

useless as sources of information. ... Torture is still about domination.”

IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing

the enemy without killing; for intelligence operations and

counterinsurgency warfare

By comparing mind control allegations to “no touch” torture techniques and the very classified

nonlethal weapons program, the purpose of the bizarre sounding mind control allegations begins to

make sense. Neuroweapons include the CIA’s still classified neuroscience-based mind control

research, “no touch” torture and nonlethal weapons. All three are emerging state tools of the future

that can reliably neutralize the enemy psychologically or without killing. The old, politically

unacceptable methods of brutal physical torture and killing won’t be eliminated but surreptitious,

scientifically proven, alternative methods are available to achieve an even greater national security

advantage. All are ideal for counterinsurgency warfare, psychological operations and intelligence

operations. The characteristics of “no touch” torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based

mind control make them more inhumane than the atomic bomb.






13

X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW,

(prisoner of war), a Soviet political prisoner and Abu

Ghraib detainees

Three relevant examples out of the numerous available provide a general overview of the decades of

mind control allegations and weapons. The details are compelling and rarely reported by

mainstream press and illustrate why a comparison of “no touch” torture to mind control allegations

is so applicable. The examples share the same Cold War history with CIA “no touch” torture,

neuroscience-based mind control and nonlethal weapons programs.

1. The 1984 BBC TV documentary Opening Pandora’s Box described EMR [electromagnetic

radiation] remote mind control developments and a claim of mind control by a Korean POW;

In the 1950s, intelligence agencies were interested in changing mental states. The

theory is that brain waves can be tuned to a different EMR frequency and can

change moods and character. ... A CIA memo stated that they were looking for

behavior control to enhance consciousness.

The Soviets had realized the same thing. Dr. Ross Adey, famous EMR researcher at

Loma Linda Veterans Hospital, examined the Lida machine, from the Soviet Union.

It was described as a machine to “rearrange consciousness.” The Russians claimed

to use it for treatment of emotional disorders in the 1950s. Dr. Adey stated that the

Lida machine is now obsolete. It used coiled wire inside ear muffs which acted like

an antenna and emitted 1/10 sec pulses of EMR. Dr. Adey demonstrated that

excited animals rapidly quiet down when exposed to the Lida EMR frequencies.

There was one account that the Lida machine was used during the Korean war for

brainwashing American Prisoners.

2. An interview of an alleged Russian victim, Andre Slepucha, was reported in a 1998 ZDF

German TV documentary. He described what seems to be the first reported victim of some type

of “microwave hearing.” Slepucha stated;

In November 1954 I came into contact with what today is referred to as

“Psychotronic Treatment” for the first time. Back then they took me out of the

concentration camp where, under Stalin, I had been imprisoned as a political

prisoner, and brought me into an isolation cell in the KGB prison which was located

in the Lubyanka. After an approximately two week long continuous occupation of

the cell I suddenly experienced in the morning strong sounds in the head, very

strong acoustic and visual hallucinations.

On the CNN news broadcast, Special Assignment by Chuck DeCaro, “Weapons of War, Is there

an RF Gap?” November 1985, Dr. Bill van Bise, electrical engineer, conducted a demonstration

of Soviet scientific data and schematics for beaming a magnetic field into the brain to cause

visual hallucinations. The demonstration on reporter Chuck DeCaro was successful. Dr. van

Bise stated, “In three weeks, I could put together a device that would take care of a whole






14

town.” A December 13, 1976, Federal Times article, “Microwave Weapons Study by Soviets

Cited” described the alleged Russian capability of microwave hearing;

The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist

research on microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in

radar, television and microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly

heart attacks in humans. Another biological effect with possible anti-personnel uses

is “microwave hearing.” “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be

originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at

very low average power densities,” the report said. According to the study,

Communist work in this area “has great potential for development into a system for

disorienting or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic

personnel.”

3. Jon Ronson, author of the New York Times reviewed book, “The Men Who Stare at Goats”

wrote about alleged mind control experiments on Iraqi detainees. In an interview on April 14,

2005 at the Politics and Prose book store in Washington DC., Ronson discussed his book.

(Tape available from Cspan, Book TV at www.booktv.org. Videotape # 186334)

And from the former detainees from Guantanamo Bay that I’ve interviewed it

seems exactly the same things are going on there. I said to a man called Jamal al-

Harith how do you feel, you know how did you feel at Guantanamo Bay and he said

“felt like a laboratory rat.” And he said, “I felt they were trying stuff out on me.” ...

And one example is with Barney the purple dinosaur. When it was announced a

year ago that they were rounding up prisoners of war in Iraq and blasting them

with Barney the purple dinosaur, it was treated as a funny story, because, by all the

major news networks in America, you know... the torture wasn’t that bad. ... It was

disseminated as funny because who wants to replace a funny story with, as Eric

[Olson] once said to me, with one that’s not fun. ...

I was given seven photographs of a detainee who had just been given the Barney

treatment as they called it. It was 48 hours of Barney with flashing strobe lights

inside a shipping container in the desert heat. ...

... The current chief of staff of the Army is a man called General Pete Shoemaker. ...

He’s well known to have an interest in these paranormal esoteric military pursuits.

... So now is the time when I know that these ideas go to the very top [levels of the

military].

One of the things you spoke of, the one that I have knowledge of is the frequencies.

You can follow a trail of patents like footprints in the snow and the patents

sometimes vanish into the world of military classification. And there’s many

patents bought up by a man called Dr. Oliver Lowry. ...






15

So we know that these patents have been bought up by the military. ... And the

detainees of Guantanamo I’ve spoken to speak of being blasted withfrequencies, put

inside music, high and low frequencies, masked with music.

...I think there’s no doubt they’re experimenting with this stuff. To add to that

controversial suggestion. I think there’s a good chance that even though they’re

trying this stuff out, it’s not necessarily true that it works. A lot of this stuff doesn’t

work. This may or may not work. I don’t know.

XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of “no touch

torture”

Psychological techniques used at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and secret prisons have included

extremes of the following; manipulation of time, loud music, strobe lights, odd sounds, hooding, ear

muffs, heat and cold, light and dark, isolation and intensive interrogation “and most importantly,

creative combinations of all these methods which otherwise might seem, individually, banal if not

benign.” As McCoy explains;

After a visit from the Guantanamo chief General Miller in September 2003, the U.S.

commander for Iraq, General Ricardo Sanchez, issued orders for sophisticated

psychological torture. As I read from those orders, please listen for the combined sensory

disorientation, self-inflicted pain, and attacking Arab cultural sensitivities.

Environmental Manipulation: Altering the environment to create moderate discomfort

(e.g. adjusting temperatures or introducing an unpleasant smell) ...

Sleep Adjustment: Adjusting the sleeping times of the detainee (e.g. reversing the

sleeping cycles from night to day).

Isolation: Isolating the detainee from other detainees. ... 30 days.

Presence of Military Working Dogs: Exploits Arab fear of dogs while maintaining security

during interrogations ...

Yelling, Loud Music, and Light Control: Used to create fear, disorient detainee and

prolong capture shock. Volume controlled to prevent injury ...

Stress Positions: Use of physical posturing (sitting, standing, kneeling, prone, etc.)

(McCoy outline, 9)






16

XII. The three key behavioral components of “no touch”

torture

McCoy described the principles underlying “no touch” torture;

Through covert trial and error, the CIA, in collaboration with university researchers,

slowly identified three key behavioral components integral to its emerging techniques for

psychological torture.

Discovery #1 Sensory deprivation In the early 1950s ...Dr. Donald Hebb found that he

could induce a state akin to psychosis in just 48 hours. ...after just two to three days of

such isolation [sitting in a cubicle ..with goggles, gloves and ear muffs on.] “the subject’s

very identity had begun to disintegrate.”

Discovery #2 Self-inflicted pain ...Albert Biderman, Irving L. Janis, Harold Wolff, and

Lawrence Hinkle, advised the agency about the role of self-inflicted pain in Communist

interrogation. ...During the 1950s as well, two eminent neurologists at Cornell Medical

Center working for the CIA found that the KGB’s most devastating torture technique

involved, not crude physical beatings, but simply forcing the victim to stand for days at a

time, while the legs swelled, the skin erupted in suppurating lesions, the kidneys shut

down, hallucinations began.

Discovery #3 Anyone can torture ...Finally, a young Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram,

...conducted his famed obedience experiments, asking ordinary New Haven citizens to

torture on command and discovering that, in contravention of conventional wisdom,

anyone could be trained to torture. ...[Milgram] did controversial research under a

government grant showing that almost any individual is capable of torture, a critical

finding for the agency as it prepared to disseminate its method worldwide. (McCoy

outline, 4, Question of Torture, 32-33)

By the project’s end in the late 1960s, this torture research had involved three of the 100

most eminent psychologists of the 20th century-Hebb, Milgram, and Janis, as well as

several presidents of the American Psychiatric Association and the American

Psychological Association. (A Question of Torture, 33)

That notorious photo of a hooded Iraqi on a box, arms extended and wires to his hands,

exposes this covert method. The hood is for sensory deprivation, and the arms are

extended for self-inflicted pain. ... Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods,

no-touch torture leaves deep psychological scars on both victims and interrogators. One

British journalist who observed this method’s use in Northern Ireland called sensory

deprivation “the worst form of torture” because it “provokes more anxiety among the

interrogatees than more traditional tortures, leaves no visible scars and, therefore, is

harder to prove, and produces longer lasting effects.” (Question of Torture, 8-9)






17

McCoy explained how CIA “no touch” torture changes its victims;

Insights from the treatment of Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet’

s regime offer a point of entry into this complex question. Psychotherapist Otto Doerr-

Zegers found that victims suffer “a mistrust bordering on paranoia, and a loss of interest

that greatly surpasses anything observed in anxiety disorders.” The subject “does not

only react to torture with a tiredness of days, weeks, or months, but remains a tired

human being, relatively uninterested and unable to concentrate.”

These findings led him to a revealing question: “What in torture makes possible a change

of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic processes and to disorders of organic

origin?” (Question of Torture, 10-11)

XIII. Torture as “a kind of total theater”

Doerr-Zegers explained that techniques of torture work by creating deception, distrust, fear,

disorientation, a “kind of total theater” that leaves the victim disoriented and “emotionally and

psychological damaged.” The similarity of the explanation below to “street theater” found in mind

control allegations is remarkable;

As Doerr-Zegers describes it, the psychological component of torture becomes a kind of

total theater, a constructed unreality of lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably

with the victim’s self-betrayal and destruction.

To make their artifice of false charges, fabricated news, and mock executions convincing,

interrogators often become inspired thespians. The torture chamber itself thus has the

theatricality of a set with special lighting, sound effects, props, and backdrop, all

designed with a perverse stagecraft to evoke an aura of fear. Both stage and cell construct

their own kind of temporality. While the play both expands and collapses time to carry

the audience forward toward denouement, the prison distorts time to disorientate and

then entrap the victim. As the torturer manipulates circumstances to “maximize

confusion,” the victim feels “prior schemas of the self and the world ... shattered” and

becomes receptive to the “torturer’s construction of reality.”

Under the peculiar conditions of psychological torture, victims, isolated from others,

form “emotional ties to their tormentors” that make them responsive to a perverse play

in which they are both audience and actor, subject and object—in a script that often

leaves them not just disoriented but emotionally and psychologically damaged, in some

cases for the rest of their lives. (A Question of Torture, 10)






18

XIV. A comparison of “no touch” torture to mind

control allegations

The Washington Post Magazine article included interviews of several TIs, or targeted individuals of

mind control, as some call themselves. Highly acclaimed author Gloria Naylor is most recognized for

her novel Women of Brewster Place, starring Oprah in a 1980s TV mini-series. Naylor wrote the

novel 1996, about her personal experience of mind control targeting and “street theater.” The article

also included an example of drug-induced paranoia for comparison;

Like Girard, Naylor describes what she calls “street theater,” incidents that might be

dismissed by others as coincidental, but which Naylor believes were set up. She noticed

suspicious cars driving by her isolated vacation home. On an airplane, fellow passengers

mimicked her every movement, like mimes on a street.

Voices similar to those in Girard’s case followed, taunting voices cursing her, telling her

she was stupid, that she couldn’t write. Expletive-laced language filled her head. ...

Naylor is not the first writer to describe such a personal descent. Evelyn Waugh, one of

the great novelists of the 20th century, details similar experiences in The Ordeal of

Gilbert Pinfold. Waugh’s book, published in 1957, has eerie similarities to Naylor’s.

Embarking on a recuperative cruise, Pinfold begins to hear voices on the ship that he

believes are part of a wireless system capable of broadcasting into his head; he believes

the instigator recruited fellow passengers to act as operatives; and he describes

“performances” put on by passengers directed at him yet meant to look innocuous to

others.

Waugh wrote his book several years after recovering from a similar episode and realizing

that the voices and paranoia were the result of drug-induced hallucinations.

The psychological terror and mistrust bordering on paranoia of torture victims is remarkably similar

to the mind control alleged by Naylor and the drug-induced paranoia of Waugh. The “street theater”

described by most TIs also appears similar to the paranoia of mental illness and most people think

“street theater” sounds crazy.

The addendum of Naylor’s novel 1996 included this description of some of the most commonly

reported mind control symptoms;

Victims are subjected to various kinds of harassment and torture, twenty-four hours a

day, seven days a week, for years on end. Most believe that some type of technology can

remotely track, target, and control every nerve in their bodies. Heart and respiration rate

can speed up and slow down, and stomach and bowel functions are regulated. Illnesses

and all types of pain can turn on and off in an instant. Microwave burns are reported.

Sleep deprivation is common and dreams are manipulated. Victims say, “They [whoever

is targeting them] can see through my eyes, what I see.” Sometimes victims describe

seeing the images of projected holograms. Thoughts can be read. Most victims describe a






19

phenomenon they call “street theater.” For example, people around the victim have

repeated verbatim, the victim’s immediate thoughts, or harassive and personalized

statements are repeated by strangers wherever the victim may go.

Emotions can be manipulated. Microwave hearing, known to be an unclassified military

capability of creating voices in the head, is regularly reported. Implanted thoughts and

visions are common, with repetitive themes that can include pedophilia, homophobia

and degradation. Victims say it is like having a radio or TV in your head. Less frequently,

remote and abusive sexual manipulation is reported. Almost all victims say repetitive

behavior control techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or

feedback loops.

The counterintuitive and bizarre torture techniques are discernible within the mind control

allegations. The mind control techniques seem to be psychological techniques to disorient the victim

and cause him to feel completely controlled, dependent and at the mercy of his torturers. Similar to

the “kind of total theater” for torture, “street theater” is almost certainly a part of the process of

breaking one’s personality to gain behavior control over that person.

XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation

“What in torture makes possible a change of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic

processes and to disorders of organic origin?” Doerr-Zegers found the answer lies in the

psychological, not physical, “phenomenology of the torture situation;”

1. an asymmetry of power;

2. the anonymity of the torturer to the victim;

3. the “double bind” of either enduring or betraying others;

4. the systematic “falsehood” of trumped-up charges, artificial lighting, cunning

deceptions, and “mock executions”;

5. confinement in distinctive spaces signifying “displacement, trapping, narrowness

and destruction”; and

6. a temporality “characterized by some unpredictability and much circularity, having

no end.” ...

Thus, much of the pain from all forms of torture is psychological, not physical, based

upon denying victims any power over their lives. In sum, the torturer strives “through

insult and disqualification, by means of threats ... to break all the victim’s possible

existential platforms.” Through this asymmetry, the torturer eventually achieves

“complete power” and reduces the victims to “a condition of total or near total

defenselessness.” (Question of Torture, 10-11)

In torture, a torture situation is created according to Doerr-Zegers. In mind control allegations,

there is a similar phenomenology of a mind control situation. TIs describe this as “an electronic

prison.” Doerr-Zegers described the torture technique, 1) an asymmetry of power. In torture, the

torturer has complete power and the victim is completely powerless. Similarly, TIs are targeted






20

remotely and are completely powerless to stop the targeting. Doerr-Zegers described the torture

technique, 2) the anonymity of the torturer to the victim. Torture victims do not know their torturer

and similarly, there is the anonymity of the remote targeting in the mind control situation.

Most TIs described “street theater” or seemingly staged events which matches 3), 4) and 6). Doerr-

Zegers described torture technique, 5) confinement in distinctive spaces signifying “displacement,

trapping, narrowness and destruction.” Although TIs are not physically imprisoned, most victims

describe the experience as very debilitating and compare it to “mental rape, an electronic prison, or

total destruction of the quality of their lives.” Mind control poses a severe restriction on their former

lives. Doerr-Zeger’s technique 6) a temporality “characterized by some unpredictability and much

circularity, having no end” is also similar to sensory deprivation in mind control allegations. TIs

routinely report the simple but extremely repetitive and negative, stimulus-response and feedback

loops of their environment.

XVI. Comparing “no touch” torture techniques of

sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain to mind

control allegations

The psychological effects achieved by torture and alleged mind control are similar. Mind control

targeting tactics described by most TIs seem to contain the underlying “no touch” torture techniques

of sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain. For comparison, here is McCoy’s description;

To summarize, the CIA’s psychological paradigm fused two new methods, “sensory

disorientation” and “self-inflicted pain,” whose combination, in theory, would cause

victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily to

their torturers ... The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation and self-

inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum is a

hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 5)

The intended effect of sensory disorientation for torture would be similar for mind control; to create

an environment of radical uncertainty to enhance the break down of the person’s will and

personality. Most alleged cases of mind control describe the considerable repetition of seemingly

innocuous and banal stimuli in the TIs environment, as if engineered by computer. The addendum

of Naylor’s book included this description; “Almost all victims say repetitive behavior control

techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or feedback loops.” For comparison,

here is McCoy’s description;

The CIA’s “sensory disorientation” became a total assault on all senses and sensibilities,

auditory, visual, tactile, temporal, temperature, and survival. Refined through years of

practice, sensory disorientation relies on a mix of sensory overload and sensory

deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then intense interrogation, heat and cold,

light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic attack on all human stimuli. (McCoy

outline, 4-5)






21

McCoy described the photos of the hooded detainee with “the arms extended for self-inflicted pain.”

The torturer forces the prisoner to stand with arms extended and the prisoner has no control over

his situation. The prisoner still has a sense of guilt at causing his own pain by his extended arms.

This intended effect of self inflicted pain for torture seems to be similar to mind control. TIs who are

remotely targeted with physical pain cannot escape. Although TIs go to extremes in trying to escape

the physical targeting, they are unsuccessful. The psychological trauma is inflicted by the sense of

causing one’s own pain. Many TIs report that the targeting causes TIs to become isolated from

friends, families and in many cases TIs are unable to work. This common reaction to targeting seems

to be a type of self-inflicted psychological pain.

Carole Sterling’s description of targeting is also found in the addendum of Naylor’s book and seems

to illustrate the techniques of sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain. It is a typical TI

description;

In 1997, Carole Sterling wrote a letter to the editor of the Star Beacon. She described her

alleged targeting with EMR weapons technologies that within months, led to her suicide.

Dear Star Beacon, I am writing about something that happened to me which goes back to

December 1995. I went to a conference in Nevada. The day following the last night at the

conference, I noticed that I had an injection mark on the base of my spine which was

sore. Then the nightmare started three days after my return to Washington, D.C. ... It

totally scrambled my brain, leaving me unable to think properly, simply functioning on

sheer shock and horror, with total incomprehension of what was going on. It actually was

debilitating. The room felt like a torture chamber. This forced me out of my home. I

believe that the technology used, be it some type of a frequency assault, some sort of

directed energy, in addition to whatever was injected in me, has caused damage to my

brain. [I have] been living with this debilitating and excruciating pain for the last eight

months so far.

TIs describe both psychological and physical targeting similar to torture. It seems logical to surmise

that the successful psychological theories of “no touch” torture would cross over to more technically

based remote, advanced mind control programs. This becomes a significant step forward in

understanding the mind control issue. The mind control allegations are “the secret in plain sight.”






22

XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on

Hard questions need to be asked of the experts. Who now controls the neuroscience weapons

research and how advanced is it? As a result of U.S. secrecy, an educated guess is all that is possible.

The public deployment of advanced remote neuroscience weapons will be a world changing event,

affecting the lives of this generation and the next. The weapons involve national security, science,

history, U.S. politics and geopolitics. Most importantly the weapons encompass human nature, good

and evil and suffering. Most people are in agreement about one fact: unlike the atomic bomb, there

has been a total lack of public input for neuroscience weapons and policy even though the research

began in the 1950s and is still classified. Again, this raises more questions than it answers.

This article will be published in March 2008. See www.huntergatheress.com A special thank you to editor, Joan D’Arc for

her encouragement and suggestions.






CHAPTERDIVIDER






About 7,710,000 results (0.26 seconds)

Images for TRUMP MIND CONTROL

More images for TRUMP MIND CONTROL Report images

MSNBC: Donald Trump using mind control to seize power | Harris ...https://mediaequalizer.com/.../msnbc-trump-using-mind-control-to-take-control-of-a...

Aug 18, 2015 - Is Donald Trump employing a mind control strategy to seize power? And are

Americans simply unable to resist? Do all modern political ideas ...

Donald Trump's Mind Control Methods Revealed - Mike Swanson (05 ...https://thewarstate.liberty.me/donald-trumps-mind-control-methods-revealed-mike-sw...

May 29, 2016 - What few people know though is that Donald Trump used an arsenal of mind control

techniques to destroy his primary opponents and starting ...

The Mind of Donald Trump - The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of...trump/480771/

Narcissism, disagreeableness, grandiosity—a psychologist investigates how Trump's extraordinary

personality might shape his possible presidency.

Is Donald Trump Using Mind Control On Supporters? - YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRVX1qDA54A

May 31, 2016 - Uploaded by The Alex Jones Channel

Alex Jones breaks down NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) and why some

pseudo-intellectuals claim ...▶ 12:19

Is Donald Trump Using Mind Control On Supporters?!!! | Alternativebeforeitsnews.com/.../is-donald-trump-using-mind-control-on-supporters-3362495.ht...

May 31, 2016 - Alex Jones breaks down NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) and why some pseudo-

intellectuals claim Donald Trump is using it on his ...

TRUMP'S SPEECH; MK ULTRA, MONARCH, MIND CONTROLaanirfan.blogspot.com/2016/07/trumps-speech-mk-ultra-monarch-mind.html

Oct 28, 2015 - In his speech to the Republican Convention, Donald Trump linked ... Trump's friend

Michael Jackson has been linked to CIA mind control.

Don't Be Mind Controlled! Trump Tells You Truth! - The Marshall Reporthttps://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/.../dont-be-mind-controlled-trump-tells-you-t...

Jan 2, 2016 - This election please beware of candidates who use the mind control tools to attack your

thinking and tell you the biggest control trick of ...

donald trump | In Search of Black Assassinshttps://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/tag/donald-trump/

Posts about donald trump written by princeray. ... In the programming of children as mind control

subjects, Stanford Research Institute (SRI) Psychiatrist Dr.

Programming, Donald trump and Donald o'connor on Pinteresthttps://www.pinterest.com/pin/513762269962917439/

Donald Trump and his daughter Ivannah... if you Google mk ultra or monarch .... If you know MK Ultra

mind control, and you read enough about her and see the ...

All News Videos Images Shopping ToolsMore Settings

TRUMP MIND CONTROL - Google Search https://www.google.com/search?q=TRUMP+MIND+CONTROL&ie=ut...

1 of 2 11/14/2016 7:11 AM







1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

[email protected]

717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower and

Targeted Individual (Victim) of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

Executive Summary©

Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced MediaGroup are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both

Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties andhis Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he

founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblowerwhen, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer

and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted andplead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via

South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Courtfor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus

Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court ofAppeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Page 1 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015Advanced Media Grop Page 10 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 11 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 11 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Executive Summary Page 11 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 11 of 51 3/15/2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 11 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 11 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 81 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,

&

STAN J. CATERBONEFederal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)

Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Controland Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

copyright 2009

“Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding

it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or theHatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards

America and the West?

See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, aU.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this

HATRED towards America.

Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to mywww.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most

prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a weekor so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.

You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the

U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and ourTroops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I

Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. Whatdo you believe in?”

Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated: October 10, 2015

Date Completed: July 28, 2009

Date Initiated: July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com






http://www.scribd.com/amgroup



http://www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,

state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,

trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.

Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and

rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By

the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the “Attacks” and “Torture” from the

employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.

Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking

Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in

an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state

and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White

House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and

Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.

Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer

hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus

Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul

Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to

be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling

evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of “Entrapment” that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the

Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-

3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free







Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary

Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated

Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in

the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a

desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in

the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far

as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions

of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of

$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,

Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert

case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the

fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on

August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey

Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of

Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing

Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the

U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County

community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.

John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the

Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.






In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to

1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and

Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of

Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National

Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to

find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am

alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and

provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.






HISTORY

In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal

and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since

1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which

resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,

Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public

allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials

and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the

selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims

Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of

all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and

local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most

valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-

Work under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies

since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National

Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL

SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with

over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable

organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United

States as of 1992.






The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:

George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current

Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and

currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of

Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con

scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms

merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle EasternCountries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.

Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great

Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's

subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel

regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraqstory and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert

Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam

Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by

Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster

Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph

Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would notbelieve him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal

counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,Lancaster, County.







Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented JamesGuerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police

Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007

Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger

negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;

burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender

liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had

to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being

uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these

activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The

pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over

time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order

to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way

possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.

Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.

Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.

Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.

Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family

into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of

action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community

away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort

any monies and/or possessions of value.






Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues

from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of

specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited

and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are

now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted

these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved

such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or

their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and

the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be

influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in

nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant

representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-

2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of

Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security

of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May

16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.

One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,

Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under

the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet

another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking

with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total

Mind Control.






REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud

within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to

suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or

"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and

never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of

Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie

Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was

the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the

topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental

telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices

and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.

This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action

in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The

main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is

connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of

Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person

without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of

Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into

mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program

labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.






FAMILY HISTORY

If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,

Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like

the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family

because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning

business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his

father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as

his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and

finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and

had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services

industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue

everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is

against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and

has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,

father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began

during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is

most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA

or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions

with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that

were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school

documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's

subprograms.






The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and

graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional

student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well

as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a

successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the

solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was

definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities. His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized

stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a

world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a

covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history

laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of

MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City

Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking

account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster

Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his

only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President

Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the

County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own

corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial

Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more

on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his

life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised

from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of

his record online. On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate. The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend

of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per

Julianne McKinney, former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and “the one thing that I worry






about is that of dying of cancer” (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was

a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.

In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of

October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,

with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"

trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others

questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately

responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara

Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than

suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The

hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set

a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic

Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.

Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and

lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and

Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.

FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this

day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an

exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the

Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey

and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and

selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,

Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars

of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith






Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High

School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a

federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries

and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and

will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his

legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,

without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most

likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster

Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B

grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in

computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and

continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business

administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power

Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of

impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they

were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,

despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a

close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in

very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:

One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated

with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word

"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.

Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August

10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005

by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302

Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.

The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false

arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary

appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as






pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE

v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;

Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000

pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary

offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and

several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an

exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as

plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local

courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County

Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High

School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his

court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service

records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social

Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;

and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster

Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County

Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment

records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and

documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.freedomffchs.com

https://www.scribd.com






https://www.scribd.com/

http://www.freedomffchs.com/


DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently

been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are

using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is

often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay

secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist

turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

[email protected]

The following are no longer in service:www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://ww w.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup







http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup


http://www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.twitter.com/scaterbone

http://www.facebook.com/scaterbone

http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01

http://www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/


September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advance Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Derrick RobinsonFreedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

P.O. Box 9022Cincinnati, Ohio 45209

Phone 1-800-571-5618Fax 1-866-433-4170

email: [email protected]

Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking andCovert Surveillance?

Derrick,

My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center

Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like tosend your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,

unless you think the exposure would be harmful.

I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on mehere in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the

country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras acrossLancaster City — making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article

attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.

I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking andharassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some

history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in ournew convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint

venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the

CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in thedomestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the

Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,see attached.

Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were

several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.

Click here for an overview of ISC.

Click here to see t he Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or

ISC.

Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the eveningof the ISC indic tments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press

Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ BillionDollar Fraud.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kOIOTpxtj8





http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/isc-search-lancaster-newspapers-archives-dec-25-2007.pdf



http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage13.html

http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lnp-isc-headlines-may-22-2007.pdf




http://www.freedomfchs.com/

http://www.freedomfchs.com/

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one ofthe oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster

has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administrationhas a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with

ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline

regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained inmy Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his

relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of RobertGates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forthquestions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members

of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISCand the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa

and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.

Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here afew months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,

Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.

Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,National Security Agency:

"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a super-

secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listeningposts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to

follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSAmade sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma

Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in

1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firmsto stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some

civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify itsefforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its

top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been thefather of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense

structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, beganregular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,

1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.

Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, fromJanuary 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,

including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegaland unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the

agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to JimmyCarter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of

remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according toWikipedia.

Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),

former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Controlindustry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:






http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LC&p_theme=lc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_dispstring=headline(Robert%20Gates)%20AND%20date(last%206%20months)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=-6qzM&p_field_advanced-0=title&p_text_advanced-0=(%22Robert%20Gates%22)&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via

their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big timedefense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.

Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman

requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his criticsspeculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a

member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent orapproved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).

Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:

George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.

James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of

International Signal & Control, (ISC).

My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.

His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.

George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).

George W. Bush flew with the Navy.

James Cross

I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was JosephTate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin

and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick

Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letterinvolves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame

and eventually outing her.

Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense IntelligenceAgency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and

airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way toCalifornia. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense

Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making meconfirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's

Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents forCATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military basesbefore releasing me.

In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me

at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a trainingexercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield

Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weekslonger than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.

We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her newalbum, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed

by other telepathic assailants.My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was

hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon

after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.

I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.









http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-roda-documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf




Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone















AFFIDAVIT

BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced

Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science

Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal

age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed

to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone

was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words. The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning

by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited

me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my

demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that

the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in

financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders

and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station

Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and

James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;

Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.

And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as

S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my

immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies

would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT

is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.






Advanced Media Grop Page 31 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 32 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 32 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Executive Summary Page 32 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 32 of 51 3/15/2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 32 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 32 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 102 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





s [email protected]

www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.comwww.scribd.com/amgroup01

www.facebook.com/scaterbonewww.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbonehttp://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPViolations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination

and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to AuthoritiesJuly 16, 2016

Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy – Issue a few everyyear to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition toisolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit fromdefending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strongChristian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. TheMillersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial ofentitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC duringthe same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of2005, original not signed by David Pflumm

2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing

Fulton Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,

Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with BarleySnyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster CityPolice in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006

7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael

Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John

Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in

March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by

Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.















14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No

Formal Notice16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police

Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security

Officer.19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian

Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on myWordpress Blog.

20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reasonwas for complaining of harassment and stalking.

21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University PoliceChief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,Debra Hoeckler

22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,with no reason and no written notice.

23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside andwas told by bartender to leave and not come back.

24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let mecommunicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.

25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complainregarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged inDiscrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to LegalCounsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.

27.Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would notissue pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster CountyDistrict Attorney, no opinion as of yet.

28.Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office in Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA – Iarbitrarily received a phone call while delivering a CD-ROM to PA Attorney General KathleenKane re “CORRUPTION OF JUDICIAL, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND POLITICIANS” ofPennsylvania.

29.U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016at the NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over anhour and finally let go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was nolonger permitted to visit any U.S. Federal Facilities.

30.Lancaster Newspapers – In June of 2016 I arbitrarily received an email the day I wassupposed to participate in a “town meeting at LNP” and warned me that I was banned andhad been for years although in the year before I had meetings with editors regarding myMOVANT standing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert case.

31.TELLUS360, May of 2016, I went to enter on a weekend night and the doorman told meI could not enter that night without any explanation or reason.

32.Yorgos Restaurant and Bar, The owner, Mrs. Arbitrarily barred me during the month ofMarch, right before the false imprisonment at the NSA in Ft. Meade, Maryland

33.Annie Baily's Irish Pub, A bartender arbitrarily barred me in July, then they allowed mein then again a so called “Manager” banned me again. I recorded the last incident.

34.Altana Club, Bar, and Meeting Space – On Thursday, July 14, 2016 Scott, the bartenderarbitrarily banned me, which again I recorded.

35.The Press Room Bar and Restaurant – A bartender arbitrarily barred me, then again onThursday July 14, 2016 another bartender banned me, which again I recorded.






All of the above use the tactics of threats and harassment in order to invoke and provoke aresponse worthy of arrest or involuntary psychiatric commitment. When the strategy fails theyresort in illegal verbal no trespass notices by low level employees. In the summer of 2015 aLancaster City Police Officer, while parked at the Sunnoco convenience store on the corner of WestOrange and Prince Street informed me that the establishments were required to provide writtennotice, or they could not be enforced.

Downtown Lancaster Establishment's that have been endorsing and engaging inWHOLESALE STALKING, HARASSMENT, AND COLLUSION TO PHYSICAL THREATS OFVIOLENCE ON A REGULAR BASIS, 2005 to present:

• Yorgos Restaurant and Bar• Mariott Bar at Penn Square• Annie Baily's Irish Pub• TELLIUS 360 Irish Pub, Nightclub, and now computer lab• Altana Club, Bar, and Meeting Space• Cigar Bar• O'Hallorans Bar and Restaurant• Lancaster Dispensing Company• The Press Room Bar and Restaurant• The Federal Taphouse• Lancaster City Police Department Headquarters

Dated: March 18, 2016






of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015Advanced Media Grop Page 36 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 37 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 37 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Executive Summary Page 37 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 37 of 51 3/15/2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 37 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 37 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 108 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





��

�

��

�!" ��# ��"��$%�&�� !�� "�#��$��%��

�� "&#� �� '�� $��(��%�� '�� (�� "� � ")��"�� *�� )�� !�� "� !��+ �"� *�� "� ,�

!�� ,�""�� !�" � ��!��"� �� !�� "��!�� ,��,�

��+ �� "�-�� !��!� �� )��

�� *�� %� �� (�� *�� (��

��%�� !�� .�� /"0��!�� , �*��1��!��+��2"3��

�

� � 4��- �� 1 �� "��"� 1�,� � !�� !� � ��4�� 1�,� � �� !��!� �� )�� ** !"��

�� ! ��5� ��6 )��"��"�� #��4��4��+��&,,-��.��.��$��/��..$/�� &,,0��

��%��%��1��2��1��%�� &,,� � � � 3�� &,,�� %�� 4��%��

��%��

& � �� ,��,"� �� " �"�� !,�� " � �5�� 00�� 6��

��7��8��9��%��

: � 7-�� 8, �9��, �"2��! "�,��,�, ��!��1� �, �� ** !��

��, �!� ��:��7 �� ),��.��4��;��

��&,,-��(��&<;=�� 5��(�� >�� $;$��?�� $��

�� !��%��%��4�� 1��&,,@��&,,=��,�� $��>��

�� A��1�B3��.+�� &,,= ��1�B3�� 2�� >��

��%��






�

< � � )�� *� "� )� �� !�� A�� 24��1��!��'��&,,��&,�, ��A��%��

1�� 2��5�� %��%�� "��#9� �� 9� ��

- � ��!��)��"��"��"�� ;��"� ��,�� .��4��4��"$��C#��&,,@(&,,= ��A��D��$��

3�� 1�� B�� 3�� 24�� %�� 5�� !�� %��

��% � ��&,,0��4��%�� %�� !��%�3��%� ��

@ � <�� "�- �� "" ��*�� ,�!� "��+��,�� :��

!�� *�� %�� E�� %�� 0�=� ��

�� 9� �� 9� �� $�� 0�=9��00&9�00��&,,-��&,�, �$�� !��

��%��%�� !�� %�� D��3��$�� !��%��%�� 3��

= � �))��/4��0��),�� "��$��;��F��G��+��0�=��/��F��G��%�� !��+��$��3��00� ��&,,<��

�� 3�� *�� E�� 3�� 3�� "�� H��%#� �� $��/��%��$��D��$��$��.��+��

��&,,-��&,�, ��

� � 4�!-��"�� , ��- ��.�� 3�� *�� &,,@� �� D�� $�� /�� B��$��&,,� ��

0 � 6��-)�! � �� 24�� 0�=� �� .�� A�� *�� D�� /��4� �� /�� 00�� 3�� $�� 00=;�00� � � .�� 5��:��

��

�, � #��!� 7�� 3�� %�� &,,-� �� &,�,� �� !�� D�� $��

$��!��D��$��3��D��3��$��D�%��A��D��E�� 7F��!��8�F��D��$��&,,-��&,,0��>�� %�� !��D��$��

3��D��A��%�� ;��%�� .��+�%� ��%�� 4 ��E�� $��






�

�� ) �� 7�� 24�� 00�� F��F��A��$;$��(F��7��8 ��!��

�� .�� ,-(&&��&,,-��1��$��2��1��3��

�& � # � =�� $�� %�� &,,-� �� D�� $�� /��B��3��1��

�: � �� 5�� "� �*� <�� :#��) �� "�� .�� 0�=� ��/��F��G�� 00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3��1�� $�� 3�� .��/��$��

�< � �� > )�"" ""��"�� 0�=� �� /��;3��$��&,,@��

�- � #,�"�!��""��"��E��%��D��E��$��&,,-��$��D�� 3��

�@ � ��" � �� ""�� 24�� =� �� 0�=� �� &,� �� &,,-� �� &,,@� �� $��3��D��$��$��$��3�� !��

�= � ��" � ��)��"�� "�� =� ��,�� D��$��3�� 0�=��@,��&,,@�� !��@,�1�� &,,@� �� 9��

�� !��@,�� !��

�� #"�!,��!��" "�1�,��" ��!�� "�*��# �) ��":��- �"��E�� 0�=� �� /�� F��

G�� .�� &,,-� �� !�� !��B��3��

�0 � ��"�� #��) ��.��0�=��/��F��G��00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3�� 1�� $�� 3�� /��$�� :�� &,,-��

��'��9��9��9��9��9�� A�� %��

��

&, � ("� ��,�� !�� .�� 00�� $�� 3�� $�� !��7��8��

&,�,�� !�� F��&,,��&,�, �






�

&� � �, *"��*�#��) ��F��)��$��

&& � ��"��:��!-�� &,,-��4��%�� A��D��$��3��1��

&: � ��;�!��, ��!��"��>��?�" �� 24��&,,0�� 5��>��;�� B��

��%� ��

&< � ��)� �� <!-�� $��/��%�� $��D��$��$��.��+��&,,-��

&,�, ��F�� $��%��&,�, ��5��%��%��(�� 2�� %��

&- � �� -�� A�� &,,-� �� &,�, � � $�� A�� )��A��+��.+��$��$��

&@ � �� * � �! :� ��:�, *� �*� @�� 7��"�� .�� 3�� 0�= � � ��&,,�� &,,0�� 3�� *��

&= � 5� !�� !� 6 )��"� ��"�� 7�"!� � �)"�":��)"�� .��4��&,,@�� E��4��&,,@��"��#��

&� � 5� !�� !�6 )��"��"�� ;��.��4��&,,- ��

&0 � ��! ��<�")��+��"��.��/��0�=�"&#��@��-��9�&,,@��:��9�&,,0��

��9��&,�,�� .��$��$��/��B��00��&,,� ��

:, � 7��)�� , *� �*��!�� "��F�� 0�= ��

A��;A�� 0�=� �� F��0�= ��






� � �3� � ��!�� !��6��0�= � ��0�=� �� "��$��.��.��

�� +�� 1�� $�� .�� #� �� I�$��$��"2��!��$��+��#�� '��J��+�� .�� 00&� ��

�+$;F��&,;&,��F��00� �!��'�� D�� 3�� $� 24��"$��A�� +��1��.��#�� $��$� ��$��1��1��"1E1#�$��

�� K�� 0=,K� ��E�� K�� 3��>��L��F��F��.� �A��A�� .��F��+��B��+��1��$�

��+��1��$��$ ��$��1��1�� B�� 6�� $� �� 3��>�� +�� B�� 1�� $��

��$��!�� 00,K�� >�� 1�� B�� 3��>�� 1�B3�� F�� !�� F��!� �� !�A�! � � � � !�� >��

�� 1��1�� 00��%�� F��F�� )��%��3��F��7��8 � � � ��

&,,-��&�1��1�� !�4�� '�� A��.��3��!�4��

�� A�� F�� 4�� 0<,K�� 4��

��0=,K��0�,K��00,K��9�� A� ��.��1�� 3��>�� %�� 2!� �4�� /��&,,��F��)��%�$�� A�� .��

�� 0@,K�� D�1� �4�� A?�D!B�� 0@,K��"��#��+��$��0�<9��F��$��$��*��00� �/��

��7��D�18�� .�� E��%��0�=��

��$ ��%��0�,K��M��M � 1�� $�� 0�=�� 00�� 00=� E�� %�� /�� %�� 4�� !�� &,,-�� (

�� 9� �� 9� �� ;�� !�� 1��$��$�!2B+EF2��

D��$��3�� ,-(��(&&�� !��






�

�� # �") !�� "�7!��N��(�� O� �� O� �� N��

�� .�� !�� 5��4��(��F�� 5��(

�� G��A�� 8� A'��, �? ��*��? 1�� *��"�"��*�#"�!,�"�"� ��, � ��,��*�7��"��

� !,��A�� ,�

(��> " �!,��'!�� B��$C��*�#"�!,�D��!�� "��&��

�73��"��

��#��(��K��;�� 2�� .��

��"��#�(��K�� !�� ;�� 5�� 7�� !��8� �� 9� ��9� ��9� ��9�

��9��9�� %�� !��%��(�� %�� '�� 5��

��%�� !��7A��8�!��$��'��O��7D�.2��(��8�!��8 ��*��

��O��%�8 ��

�

'��+ ��(��-��

7��(�� '��%��(

�� %��

!��%��%��%�� 4��%�� K��

�� K�� M��M� �� M�%��M� �� %��(��K�� 8

'��+ ��-��6 �"� �

� ��7E��%�� '��N�� %(�� (

�� 4�� (��;�� !��(�� (

�� 7��8��(��7��8�� 8�7�-�7��>�!,






!�� *�, " ��1"�

��!�� , �*��1��3��@��E��!� ��DD� �! ��1��*��))��)��

��@��E��!� ��DD��-��

�B��&.��@��DD��

�B�@��.��DD��")��!��"��,"��*�"�� *� ��(��!� ��")��"��

� ��"�

�B�@��&�DD�� )��"� ��

�B�@��.��DD�� )��*��,"�� !��*��1�

�B�@��&��DD��)��!�� *�" ��*��

�B�@��$�DD��")��!��7��

�B�@��DD�7��

�B�@��E��DD��"!��"�� *��*��

.��@��EB&�DD��!��*�� )��*��,"�

.��@��EB��DD��")��!�� * � �1�,�!��,"�

&��@��&�B�DD�6,�"� ��1 ��)�� !��"�

�B�@��DD�5��"� ��!��!�

�B�@��&�DD��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD��) ��1�,��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��&�DD�> ��"��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD�'�"��!��!�� "��!��*��!��*�� "�� "��

��

�B�@��E�DD��) �� ; �!�" ��*��,"�� )��)� � ��"��!��

��) � �� * � �1�,�"� �

�B�@��%��DD��*�) �F��)��!��, ��!��) �F��

�"E��#��PPPPPPP�"��%# ��

�

��>7��'?��

�� %��4��%��

�� "��#�PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��"��# �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��1�� PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�$��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��PPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��&,PP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��3��24� �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��I�� .��.��$��/��I�� $��Q�&,�,�"!��

��&,�,��.��.��$��/��I�� #�

Stan J. CaterboneStan J. Caterbone

June 19, 2015

Pennsylvania

Lancaster

19 June 15

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 Don't Know When

SJC






THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007






THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007






[email protected]

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED

STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.

The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to

individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic

telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts. We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this

legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: [email protected] and visit our library of

documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

_________________________________________________

The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

Page 1Advanced Media Grop Page 1 of 50 Friday, December 11, 2015Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 2 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 2 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Executive Summary Page 2 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 2 of 51 3/15/2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 2 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 2 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 123 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





Advanced Medi Group Press Release Page 1 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Press Release Page 1 of 51 Thursday, December 17, 2015Advanced Media Group Executive Summary Page 1 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 1 of 51 3/15/2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 1 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Stan J. Caterbone Executive Summary Page 1 of 51 Tuesday, March 15, 2016 CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 124 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





District Office

Second Street

King City Mo.

660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly

by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical

injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on

men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use

of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.

Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their

knowledge or consent.

There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of

Veri-chip and RF signals.

I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,

Rep. Jim Guest

May 21, 2009

Capitol Office

State Capitol

Jefferson City Mo.

573-751-0246






Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title -

This bill may be cited as the “Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

Bill”””

Section 2. Findings and Purpose

A) Findings

1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration

of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among

these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, “the framers of the Constitution sought

"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for

this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.“

3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the

voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.

4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the

Convention.

B) Purpose

To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,

directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to

purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.

Section 3. Organized Stalking

If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously

harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,

or by imprisonment in a federal prison.

If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,

injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,

or four years.

For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of

conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the

person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *






For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a

period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected

activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that

performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern

of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target

of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to

prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."

For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited

to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any

contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his

or her immediate family.

For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person

related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly

resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

Section 4. Punishment for threats

Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great

bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in

writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and

thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year..

For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or

not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly

resided in the household.

"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,

computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices

Obscene, threatening or annoying communication

(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by

means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the

person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.






(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by

means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or

electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand

dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:

(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any

combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.

(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of

an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic

contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.

(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where

the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed

when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a

telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.

(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person

or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.

(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not

limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault

upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by

imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that

directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of

inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,






mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies

directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.






Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based weapons

May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore9 comments

The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically

and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.

Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),

introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident who claims she’s been targeted by “remote transmission” from space-based weaponry.

Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around the country to speak at Tuesday’s council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been

zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.

The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty

permanently banning “space-based weapons,” even though the legislation first introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that

Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.

Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly

emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.

RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two

yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.

“I’m going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of






http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/#comments

https://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/

dumb ideas,” Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based

weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the

past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.

The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.

The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that

supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from long-range missiles might not be wise.

Pimple disputed what he called “knee-jerk” reactions from RPA members who depicted President Ronald Reagan’s proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as

the “Star Wars” initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the project’s

moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.

The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, “is you can knock out someone’s weapons long

before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.

RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for

the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college

that predicted truths 20 years in advance.

“It’s easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the

wrong mindset,” Martinez said.

Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesn’t support war.

“The weaponization of space…is something I think is extremely immoral and we should not be as a nation engaging in,” Myrick said. “Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that

may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset…..that’s why I support this resolution.”

Amy Lee Anderson, a “targeted individual” who brought the matter to Beckles’ attention, was thankful that the council took up the issue.

“No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support,” Anderson said. “We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are

dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no experience to fathom it, it’s so sophisticated.”

Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning ‘exotic’ space-based

weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones

Comments

1. C’mon Richmond Standard….your bias is showing!






http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/dirty-bomb-drill-in-richmond-alarms-conspiracy-theorists-including-alex-jones/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

November 14, 2016

Trending: chris hedges donald trump election 2016 electoral college hillary clinton neoliberalism

M O S T R E A D

M O S T C O M M E N T S

M O S T S H A R E D

In Wake of DonaldTrump’s Victory,Progressives Urge a

Democratic PartyOverhaulBy Andrea Germanos /Common Dreams

Four Years of DonaldTrump Could Sink thePlanet (Video)By Juan Cole / InformedComment

Hillary Clinton andDemocrats’ Fatal

Error: Writing OffWhite Workers in theRust BeltBy Alec MacGillis / ProPublica

Edward SnowdenMakes a SurpriseAppearance at the

ACLU SoCal Bill ofRights Dinner(Video)

Website SpreadsDoctored Video to

Pin 2015 FatalBeating on CurrentPost-Election

Protesters

With Obama’sHelp, Commander

in Chief Trump WillWield AbundantMilitary and

SurveillancePower

Insensitivity to

Inequality AmongWomen Played aCrucial Role in

Clinton’s Defeat

SNL: ‘Hillary’ Pays

With Obama’s Help, Commander in Chief Trump Will Wield Abundant

Military and Surveillance Power

Posted on Nov 12, 2016

Donald Trump. (Gage Skidmore / CC BY-SA 2.0)

When Donald Trump becomes commander in chief in January, he’ll assume control of an unaccountable

drone program, an FBI with a record of spying on mosques and activists, and a surveillance empire currently

held in check with executive restraints as durable as tissue paper.

“Caught off guard by Hillary Clinton’s election defeat, Democrats who defended these powers under President

Obama may suddenly be having second thoughts as the White House gets handed over to a man they

described — with good reason — as ‘unhinged,’ and ‘dangerously unfit,’” writes Alex Emmons at The

Intercept.

After eight years of trusting the President with expanding military power, liberals must now

reckon with the fact that Obama will pass the same capabilities to a man who has proposed

killing terrorists’ innocent family members, who has said he would do “a hell of a lot worse than

waterboarding,” and who has suggested dipping bullets in pigs’ blood is sound counterterrorism

strategy. …

As for the NSA, Congress passed a law in 2015 ending the bulk collection of Americans’ phone

records and replaced it with a modified program. But according to a former State Department

official, the phone records program is minuscule compared to the government’s “universe of

collection” under Executive Order 12333, which Trump is free to reinterpret or modify.

To make matters worse, the Obama administration has convinced courts that citizens cannot

challenge the legality of NSA programs until they can prove they are under surveillance.

Because government secrecy makes that generally impossible, courts have started

to reject anti-surveillance lawsuits on procedural grounds. …

With an additional stroke of his pen, Trump could reopen the global network of CIA “black sites”

and imprison people there without any due process. After the Supreme Court ruled under Bush

that Guantanamo detainees have rights under habeas corpus, the Obama administration in

2009 fought to avoid having the same rule applied to military prisons around the world. …

Trump, who has said he would “bomb the shit” out of terror groups and has proposed killing

HOME EAR TO THE GROUND COLUMNISTS TRUTHDIGGERS CARTOONS ARTS & CULTURE DIGS MULTIMEDIA SHOP DONATE


1 of 2 11/14/2016 7:12 AM






Tribute to LeonardCohen; Chris Rock,Dave Chapelle on

Racist Voters(Video)

‘Love Still Trumps

Hate’: ProtestersMake a Show ofHumanity in New

York City (Photos)

A Cartoonist’sApology (Video)

FrackopolyBy H. Patricia Hynes

Journalism Icon I.F.Stone’s Words RingTruer Than Ever in

‘All Governments Lie’By Jordan Riefe

‘Arrival’: A Gossamer

Dream of HopeBeams In From OuterSpaceBy Carrie Rickey

Writer and ActressLynn Ferguson on theArt—and Power—of

StorytellingBy Eileen Cronin

The Second Arab

Awakening:

Revolution,

Democracy, and the

Islamist Challenge

from Tunis to

Damascus

By Adeed Dawisha

$18.16

The Coldest Winter

By David Halberstam

$35.00

Organic Cotton

T-Shirt

$24

terrorists’ innocent families, will also inherit a global, unaccountable program of drone

assassination. Obama started a vast escalation of Bush’s drone program in 2009, and

Democrats have trusted him to assassinate people he deems an “imminent threat,” even when

they are far away from war zones, and when he doesn’t even know who he is killing. …

The Obama administration has also convinced courts that they have no role to play in reviewing

the legality of drone strikes – even when it involves killing a U.S. citizen. Lawsuits on behalf of

drone victims, filed both before and after strikes took place have all been dismissed, setting the

stage for Trump’s targeting decisions never to see their day in court. …

And perhaps most alarming is that Trump will inherit a Justice Department that has waged an

unprecedented war on press freedom. Rather than shut down the Bush-era office that

prosecuted leaks to the press, Obama made it his own, and has prosecuted more than twice as

many people under the Espionage Act for leaking information to the press than all of his

predecessors combined. His actions met with no resistance from Democrats.

“President Obama has spent much of his time as commander in chief expanding his own military power, while

convincing courts not to limit his detention, surveillance, and assassination capabilities,” Emmons continues.

“Most of the new constraints on the security state during the Obama years were self-imposed, and could

easily be revoked.

Continue reading.

—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


2 of 2 11/14/2016 7:12 AM







mailto:[email protected] 717.427-1621 Fax

Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION __________________________________________________________________________

American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan; Council on American-Islamic Relations; Counsel on American-Islamic Relations Michigan; Greenpeace, Inc.; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; James Bamford; Larry Diamond; Christopher Hitchens; Tara McKelvey; and Barnett R. Rubin, Plaintiffs v. National Security Agency/ Central Security Service, and Lieutenant General Keith B. Alexander, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, Defendants

: : : : : : : Case No. 2006-cv-2095 : Case No. 2006-cv-2140 : : Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor : : : : : : : : : :

__________________________________________________________________________________

BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CATERBONE

and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

_________/s/_______________

Date: February 20, 2007 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 174516 717-427-1821 facsimile [email protected]

Advanced Media Group Page 1 of 20 02/21/2007CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONPage 135 of 159 Monday November 14, 2016





__________________________________________________________________

TABLE OF CONTENTS _____________________________________________________________

I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ...............……….......3 II. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND

ADVANCED MEDIA ……………………………………..………………………………………………5 III. ARGUMENT …………………………………………………………………………………………………21






__________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE __________________________________________________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone is a private citizen and the majority shareholder of the United States

incorporated business Advanced Media Group. Stanley J. Caterbone was a whistle-blower and

shareholder in 1987 involving the United States Defense Contractor International Signal & Control,

Plc., known as ISC. In 1992, International Signal & Control was indicted and found guilty of among

other things a Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations concerning illegally shipping cluster bomb

technologies, missile defense systems, and other defense systems to foreign interests including South

Africa, Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Cluster bombs and related technologies are known to have been

exported to Iraq by the Chilean Arms Dealer Carlos Cardoen, a joint venture partner of International

Signal & Control. The Central Intelligence Agency is confirmed to have been involved in a covert

program to arm Iraq during the 1980’s with close ties to International Signal & Control, which

allegedly included the help of the National Security Agency, a former end user of International Signal &

Control technologies under the early 1980’s program Project X. A Presidential Finding in 1984 by the

Bush Administration was executed to implement the program of arming Saddam Hussein and Iraq with

the cluster bomb technologies. Serious allegations of these programs were the focus of investigations

that included the knowledge and supervision of then appointed nominee for the Director of Central

Intelligence Agency, Robert M. Gates.

Since 1987, Stanley J. Caterbone has been the victim of vast civil conspiracy that started in

1987 to cover-up allegations of fraud within International Signal & Control during the negotiations and

merger of International Signal & Control and Ferranti International of England. Stanley J. Caterbone

alleges that warrantless surveillance was used to obstruct justice and moot his constitutional rights in

an effort to divert attention away from his allegations of fraud within International Signal & Control

back in 1987, and afterwards to the present as a means to deny his access to the courts for remedy

and relief, and Federal False Claims Act violations. The business of Advanced Media Group has been

greatly compromised and intellectual property stolen during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s that

included information technology contracts with the United States Government.

In January of 2006, Stanley J. Caterbone was detained at every airport security check point,

which was during a policy of random checks, and taken out of line during travel from Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania, to Houston, Texas, and on to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. At the Houston Airport, Stanley J.

Caterbone was falsely accused of carrying plastics explosives and taken to an interview room by

Homeland Security officials. Stanley J. Caterbone was also detained for three days in Mexico, and was

not provided with an opportunity to gain access to a flight out of the country by Mexican Officials.






The interest of amicus in this case is ensuring that constitutional rights of private citizens are

not compromised and justice subverted through information obtained from warrantless surveillance

upon which there is no just cause for any allegations or association with terrorism. Whistle-Blowers

are inherently supportive of a system of checks and balances within our government that go beyond

our constitutional doctrines regarding the same. Whistle-Blowers ensure that the rule of law is

universally applied to all government officials in all branches of government. The Federal False Claims

Act and its provisions protect individuals from abuse of power, while providing relief and remedies for

those that were wronged and those that had the courage to cite a wrong.

It is too easy for present and future administrations to abuse their power and utilize

warrantless surveillance as a means of subverting and obstructing justice for those that are engaged in

Whistle-Blowing cases that concern National Security. Without the proper oversight and judicial

review, a Whistle Blower can be place on terrorist lists for malicious reasons without the knowledge or

just cause. This is in direct conflict with keeping our democracy free of corruption while adhering to

the spirit of the constitution in the manner our founding fathers envisioned.






__________________________________________________________________________

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMICUS CURIAE __________________________________________________________________

Background Information: The following transcripts from National Broadcast Television, ABC News

Nightline and ABC News 20/20; provide material information as to the activities of International Signal

& Control and the importance of these matters with regard to National Security.

ABC NEWS 20/20 FEBRUARY 1, 1991 [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – This is the story of how this deadly weapon,

designed for the U.S. military made its way form this country to Iraq. And how American Soldiers may

face the devastation of a cluster bomb if a ground war breaks out in the Persian Gulf. Federal Officials

believe Saddam Hussein got his arsenal thru a lethal combination – bureaucratic foul ups in the U.S.

Government and simple greed.

Here is how the cluster bomb works. An artillery shell, an airplane, or a rocket launcher sends the

bombs toward their targets. Each bomb carries hundreds of smaller bomlets, something like hand

grenades. Cluster bombs can be used against ground troops or tanks, and can even scatter mines to

lie dormant for days. The bombs can spray thousands of pounds of sharp objects – pins or even razor

blades. The shrapnel can rip through anyone or anything in its way, causing massive casualty among

civilians or ground troops. You can see the destruction in these buildings in Lebanon after a cluster

bomb attack.

How did Iraq obtain the cluster bombs and the ability to make their own? It was incredibly simple.

Investigators believe it started with International Signal & Control, A government contractor with

5,000 employees based in Pennsylvania, which build key components of cluster bombs in a subsidiary

in California. 20/20 has learned Federal Investigators believe ISC provided the technology, that is the

plans, to this man, Carlos Cardoen, Chilean arms dealer. Authorities believe he used the plans to

build the cluster bombs in Chile, then he shipped them to Iraq.

What’s wrong with all this? If the cluster bomb technology actually left the county, that is illegal

without U.S. Government permission, investigators say ISC never got. It is also illegal for a foreigner,

like Cardoen, to take the plans out of the United States without a license, which sources tell us, he

never obtained. The man who opened the door to Iraq for Cardoen, was this man Nasser Bedouin. He

is a Lebanese born middleman for Cardoen who is based in the United States. Bedouin traveled often

to Bagdad, and arranged for sale cluster bombs and other military hardware to Saddam Hussein’s

army. In his first television interview, he told us about the business of dealing in deadly weapons.






[Nasser Bedouin, Arms Dealer] – I can sell you a knife to peel an apple, if you cut someone’s

throat, that’s your business. Weapons do not kill, who behind them kill.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – With slick promotional videos, Cardoen marketed

his arms throughout the world. Arab countries were favorite customers.

[Cardoen Marketing Video] – Each one of the bomblets of the cluster bomb is multi purpose and

contains an incendiary, anti personnel and anti armor detection.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – This letter from Cardoen authorizes Bedouin to

sell cluster bombs to Saddam Hussein during his war with Iran. This letter says Cardoen’s company is

willing to take its share in helping Iraq in its time of need. We can provide you with our cluster bombs

at the lowest possible price. According to these contracts the sale of cluster bombs to Iraq was an

extremely lucrative business. February 24, 2984 3,000 cluster bombs sent to Saddam Hussein’s army

worth $21 million dollars. A few months later, another 3,000 cluster bombs, another $21 million

dollars. The supply of cluster bombs eventually totaled more than $400 million dollars. In fact,

Bedouin is suing his former boss for commission payments.

According to Bedouin, Cardoen not only sold the bombs produce in Chile to Saddam Hussein, he

actually set up a factory near Bagdad. So the Iraq President could mass-produce his own cluster

bombs. That was one of the first attacks by the military when the attack began. It’s unknown

whether that plant is totally out of commission.

[Nasser Bedouin, Arms Dealer] – He set up a factory to manufacture the cluster bomb. Um, ah

later stage for the fuses. And this is a complete project. I mean its completer from raw material to

finished product. Because the purpose in Iraq is to have control over the weaponry they have put in

their strategy.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Federal Investigators are now trying to bring

Carlos Cardoen to justice. But why didn’t they find out about him sooner? He has been selling cluster

bombs to Iraq for nearly a decade. The U.S. Patent Office knew about Cardoen back in 1986. But

they didn’t tell anyone else in the Federal Government about them. In a move that went apparently

unchecked in the highest levels of the government, Cardoen applied for his own patent for cluster

bombs in 1986. Based on some changes on previous designs, he received the patent two years later.

Getting the Patent is not illegal. But at a time when U.S. shipments of arms to Chile were banned, as

to all sales to Iraq, Why didn’t the Patent Office raise any questions why was this foreigner dealing in

U.S. arms?






Experts say bureaucratic infighting regularly causes such lapses. The Departments of Commerce,

State, and Defense, are supposed to control arms sales, and communicate with one another.

[Anthony Cordazman, Correspondent] - Even today, the same squabbling goes on, every day

within the Commerce, State, and Defense. The Administration can never agree on what kinds of laws

can be passed to correct this.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Carlos Cardoen denied our requests to speak on

camera. In an interview last year, he denied he did anything wrong.

[Carlos Cardoen, Chilean Arms Dealer] - And as long as a human being is an animal that needs to

defend himself, weapons are going to exist. I think that is wrong. As a human being I believe that

weapons are wrong. But they are a fact. And we have to live with facts.

The former head of ISC, James Guerin, who dealt with Chilean, said he did not provide anything to Cardoen to build

weapons. But Nasser Bedouin tells a different story.

[Nasser Bedouin, Arms Dealer] – I believe that Dr. Carlos Cardoen got the plans to build the

cluster bombs from the United States.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Questions about the cluster bombs come at a

time when questions are being focused on how so many American designed weapons got into the

hands of Saddam Hussein. Senator John McCain.

[Senator John McCain] – There’s not just one Saddam Hussein on this globe. There’s lots and lots

of them who at this time as we speak are acquiring technologies to give them the capabilities of

weapons of mass destruction because it’s a way of gaining victory on the cheap.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – McCain has introduced legislation that would

severely penalize and company or countries that would sell weapons illegally or harbor arms dealers.

[Senator John McCain] – To provide many of the kinds of weapons that we have today to many

nations, which are clearly offensive in nature, and are clearly far exceed their requirements to defend

themselves, is frankly unconscionable and must be brought to a stop.

[Lynn Sherr, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Basically what you are saying is hit them in the

pocketbook.






[Senator John McCain] – Hit them in the pocketbook and public exposure. No corporation or nation

likes to be branded as a nation that is involved in this illicit trafficking.

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – But public exposure and pressure will not shield

American Soldiers. If Saddam Hussein uses the cluster bombs he already has.

[Senator John McCain] – And if there is one good thing that has come out of this Persian Gulf war

it’s to dramatically heighten the awareness of the people of the world to the American people of how

dangerous this proliferation of weapons of mass destruction can be.

[Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – God those things are vicious. Have there been

any indictments yet Lynn?

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Ah, no Hugh, no indictments yet. Carlos

Cardoen has not been indicted, even though Federal Agents raided his headquarters office in Miami.

And U.S. Customs people took a number of documents, but no indictments yet, but there are

investigations going on.

[Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – If these things are dropped from airplanes,

and we have air supremacy, as it now has been said by our leaders, is there that much to worry about

for our troops?

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – We’re told yes, because you don’t need to an

airplane to a cluster bomb, they can also be used on rocket launchers and on unguided missiles, both

of which Iraq has. And incidentally, we talked about that bomb factory, even if it was badly damaged,

the cluster bomb factory he already has, were told in three to six months it can be operational again,

and anyway he likely has a big stockpile.

[Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – We of course, have these weapons also, and I

understand they are called something different?

[Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Yes, if you’re listening to a Pentagon Briefing,

don’t listen for the term cluster bomb, there calling them Aerial Denial Weapons.

[Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] – Thank you Lynn.

END






ABC News Nightline - September 12, 1991 [Ted Koppel] – incidentally the function of the senior review panel is to advise one man, the director

of central intelligence. And at least part of the period in question there was an acting director of the

CIA – Robert Gates. We’ll attempt to pull some of these threads together when we come back.

Commercial Break

[Ted Koppel] – When all is said and done, why should your or your representatives in Congress care,

eventually after all President Bush spoke and acted against Sadaam Hussein more forcefully than

anyone could have expected.

[Former President George H. Bush Speech] – We’re dealing with Hitler revisited, a totalitarianism,

a brutality, that is neglect and unprecedented in modern times.

[Vidoe-Gary Milhollin, Director, The Wisconsin Project] – The more we gave Sadaam, the more

dangerous he got. And ultimately we had to go to war to destroy what we sold him.

[Ted Koppel] – But it’s not a question of holding the Bush or Reagan Administrations to account for

having made mistakes with regards to their policies toward Iraq – The issue is how those policies were

implemented.

As we reported over the past few months, The Atlanta Branch of an Italian Bank, BNL, was able to

funnel $Billions, some of it in U.S. Credits to Iraq’s Military Procurement Network. The U.S.

Government knew, and turned a blind eye. Sophisticated Military Technology was illegally transferred

from a major U.S. company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania (International Signal & Control), to South

Africa, and Chile, and from there onto Iraq. The Iraqi borne designer of a chemicals weapons plant in

Lybia, set up shop in Florida, producing and shipping to Iraq chemical weapon components. The CIA,

FBI, and other U.S. agencies were made aware of the operation and did nothing to prevent it.

During the 1980’s and into the 90’s senior officials of both the Bush and Reagan Administration

encouraged the privatization of foreign policy, certainly towards Iran and Iraq. The policy may have

had merit - but there weren’t willing or in some instances weren’t successful in fighting it out in Capital

Hill – so they found other ways. They made a mockery of the Export Control System, and they found

ways of encouraging foreign governments to do what our laws prohibited. They even knew or if not

were guilty of the grossest incompetence that U. S. companies were collaborating with foreign Arms

merchants in the illegal transfer of American Technology that helped Sadaam Hussein build is

formidable arsenal.






This week, the CIA again told ABC News Nightline that our allegations over the past few months

regarding covert operations to supply Iraq with U.S. Arms and weapons technologies simply were not

true.

The CIA’s Inspector General said a statement from the Agency [On Screen] - “…Has found to factual

support whatsoever for such an operation or for the involvement of Mr. Gates”.

[Ted Koppel] – At least one member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bill Bradley of New

Jersey, feels that there may be reason to doubt both those claims, and he’ll raise the issues next week

during the Gates Confirmation Hearings, next week.

The CIA also told us that it’s Inspector General has found no evidence of any “off-the-books” illegal

activity. But the CIA concedes, “off-the-books activities, are not documented.” Precisely so that

deniability can be preserved.

One thing is undeniable, this gun sight video of a stealth fighter bomber from the 32nd Tactical Fighter

Wing, last February attacking a bomb factory, on the outskirts of Bagdad – U.S. Technology in the air,

destroying U.S. Technology on the Ground. The factory was built by Carlos Cardoen.

For all of us here at ABC News, Good night.

END






ABC News Nightline - July 1991

[Ted Koppel] – Carlos Cardoen’s role in shipping arms to Iraq has been known for years. His

connection with Robert Gates has not. By the mid 1980’s Cardoen was the largest private supplier of

weapons to Iraq. In all he has believed to ship a half billion dollars worth of arms and advanced

technologies to Bagdad. At a factory 500 miles north of Santiago, Cardoen produced tens of

thousands of bombs and other equipment, absolutely essentially to Iraq during it’s eight year war with

Iran.

The material would be loaded aboard regular Iraqi airway flights flown from Santiago to Bagdad.

Cardoen did not simply ship weapons, he set up entire factories capable of producing bombs and other

explosives the components would be shipped from all over the world and then assembled in Iraq. One

of those factories turned out Cluster Bombs.

As we first reported on the 24th of May, much of the sophisticated military technology that Cardoen

was shipping to Iraq came from the United States. This company in sleepy Lancaster, Pennsylvania, is

believed to be the source for some of the Cluster Bomb technology. But there was more. Nasser

Bedouin is also an arms dealer. He acted as a middleman between Carlos Cardoen and Iraq.

[Nasser Bedouin on Video] – I am aware of Carlos Cardoen getting some type of technology from

the air fuel bomb from the United States. I believe Iraq has a viable fuel air explosive.

[Ted Koppel] – These explosives are designed to explode just above ground level like miniature

atomic bombs, literally sucking all available oxygen out of the air. It is clear that Carlos Cardoen’s

special relationship with the United States was not known by all Departments. When the Commerce

Department inquired about that relationship in early 1987, it received a cable from the U.S.

Ambassador to Chile saying “although Cardoen is involved with the sale of armaments, and he has

made his fortune from it, he is considered to be a responsible recipient of U.S. products. In fact by

1987, the covert relationship between the CIA and Cardoen was already well established.

In 1983 the Reagan Administration had become alarmed at how poorly the Iraqi military was doing

against Iran. A decision was made at the highest level of Government to begin helping Iraq.

Indeed ABC News has learned only today, that around that time, in 1983 Ronald Reagan issued a

highly classified Presidential Finding stating that it was important to the National Interests that arms

and technical assistance be covertly funneled to Iraq and with the help of the CIA. More on the

significance of that Presidential Finding in a moment.






What it unleashed was a flood of US help to Iraq. A former CIA operative who was involved in the

program has told us of a series of covert operations, in which loads of 727’s were flown into Iraq. On

one such mission in 1987 our source tells us he accompanied a planeload of Soviet built one hundred

twenty-two missiles. The Soviet equipment was shipped because it would be compatible with what

the Iraqi’s already had. By 1987, there was at least one such flight a week into Bagdad.

Our former CIA source recalls bringing in $100 dollar bills in a bowling bag, they would also carry

whiskey, cartons of cigarettes and copies of Penthouse magazines to speed up the unloading process,

which usually took place at night. Once the White House has authorized the Covert Assistance

Program to Iraq, the CIA took over. In effect the former CIA operative told us the covert operation

amounted to here is what we want you to do, and we really don’t want to know too much about how

you do it.

Our source tells us that he has at least one meeting in 1986 in Florida between Robert Gates and

Carlos Cardoen, the Chilean Arms Dealer. Other sources have told us of other such meetings. Here in

the United States and in Europe. Which brings us to an unsolicited statement that was telephoned in

to Nightline from the Central Intelligence Agency almost a month ago on June 17th. Allegations, the

statement read that Robert Gates facilitated illegal shipments to Iraq during the 1980’s are totally

without basis. Since we had never requested a statement of Mr. Gates, we didn’t know quite what to

make of it at the time. But then today we learned of that Presidential Finding, authorizing the Covert

shipment of arms to Iraq.

It would be true then that Robert Gates did not facilitate illegal shipments to Iraq, under the

Presidential Finding, the shipments would have been quite legal. But during this last set of

confirmation hearings, back in 1987, Robert Gates assured the Senate Confirmation Committee that he

would always keep the Committee current on ongoing covert operations. Indeed the CIA is supposed

to provide the Intelligence Committee with quarterly reports. According to well-informed sources on

the Committee it has had no briefings on the Covert arms pipeline to Iraq. That, said one Senator on

the Committee would be a total breach of trust. What would it do to the Gates Nomination? I asked.

It would probably be enough said the Senator, to derail the Nomination.

Again, an excerpt from Mr. Gates Testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1987:

[Robert Gates 1987 on video] – If you cannot have a system in which you can have some

confidence between A the branches of government, and confidence between the senior officials of the

Government, A that they abide by the rules, and B that they will deal with one another honestly, then

I think the system begins to collapse.






[Ted Koppel] – Late this evening, the Whitehouse communicated it’s response to the charges

contained in this report, the Whole story is unfounded. “There were never any sales; covert or overt

to Iraq or Iran through a third country. And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen.”

Well be back with more, in a moment.

[Ted Koppel] – For the viewers, this is Alan Freidman, New York Correspondent for the Financial

Times of London, and a member of the team investigating Robert Gates. Alan I’d like to begin by

repeating a statement, and let me put my specs on for a moment, the White House. “This story is

unfounded and there were never any sales covert or overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country. And

Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen”.

Ah, ah a fairly carefully drafted statement one would think.

[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] – Yes Ted, I

think that is right, I would agree with the statement that there were never any sales Iraq through a

third party. Indeed what we found was that some of the cluster bomb technology and fuel air

technology was given smuggled down to Chile, for use that were used and made and shipped on

through to Iraq. In terms of the um statement by the White House that there were never any

meetings between Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen, we have a number of sources, some of them personally

involved in these operations, one of them who was personally and physically an eye witness present at

a meeting, in Florida, with Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen in 1986. And who was told my Mr. Gates, about

other meetings that he had with Mr. Cardoen.

[Ted Koppel] – Now Congressman Gejdenson, I realized that we sort of unleashed an awful lot of

material on you today, but to what degree does this fit in with those thousands of documents that you

subpoenaed with the information that you have?

[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] – Well we

just got the documents after a several month battle with the Administration to pry them loose and it

took the vote of a subpoena by the subcommittee to start the flow of those documents, but its

certainly consistent with the information that we got with Committee staffs with some of those people

that said they were at those meetings, ah as well. I think that the important thing to remember here

is that the United States in 1982 under the Reagan Administration took Iraq off the terrorist list at a

time when some of the worst terrorist of the world were being harbored by Saddam Hussein, and we

suddenly changed our policy and continued to keep Iraq off the terrorist list, enabling the export of

dual use, ah items that can be used for dual use from the United States to Iraq, as well as these sales

that went indirectly to Iraq.






So, all through a time when they were harboring terrorists, and they killed 5,000 Kurds in 1988, and

as recent as six days before the invasion of Kuwait, when I and several members of Congress, tried to

stop the subsidy of grain sales to Iraq, the Bush Administration continued to impose any sanctions

against Iraq.

[Ted Koppel] – Well of course there’s a huge difference between grain sales and the shipment of

entire plants for the building of a cluster bomb factory.

[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] – Except for

what I think you find is that a pattern by both the Bush and Reagan Administrations to trying to assist

Saddam Hussein. What we found at one Hearing was a document from the State Department, ah that

said that the United States was ready to sell weapons to Iraq as long as they were for the personal

protection of Saddam Hussein. A policy that ignored all the outrages, a policy that ignored I think the

intent of the Congress and the American People. And that the allegations that we’ve gotten from a

number of sources seem to be consistent with that. The United States did everything it could under

the Reagan and Bush Administrations to assist Saddam Hussein.

[Ted Koppel] – Alan, I know that one of the things that we discovered in our investigations was and

I’d like you to elaborate on it a little bit was that frequently there was Federal Agencies, Law

Enforcement Agencies that was trying to uncover what was going on we found that they were stymied

at every turn. Can you talk about a that a little bit?.

[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] – Yes I think

that if we look back at other discoveries that we made, you can say that when we found ISC, the

company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that was, that had cluster bomb technology, shipped down to

Chile that was part of this covert operation for Iraq, we found that the CIA had detailed knowledge

over a period of 4 ½ years of all sorts of shipments from ISC to South Africa, some of which were later

trans shipped to Iraq, we found that Federal Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies were unable to do

anything about it because they just weren’t told. Likewise, we were just told of the case that the man

that built the Rapta Chemical Weapons plant in Libya, who ah, even though the CIA were tracking him

very carefully here in the United States, was allowed to build a chemical weapons plant here in Florida,

and shipped dangerous cyanide with the help of CIA Contract Shippers to Iraq. All of these things

were going on and the investigators seem unable to do anything about any of these things. We seem

to have part of the Government trying to investigate, and part of the Government trying to ship.

[Ted Koppel] – Congressman Gejdenson I’d like to get your reaction to that and see if your

experiences have been similar in some of the findings that ah or some of the conclusions that you

have reached, but we’ll take a break first and be back in just a moment.






[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] – Well we

saw it ah from across all of the agencies. We had Dennis Kloskey who was then in charge of export

licensing at Commerce testify before our committee in April that he suggested to Mr. Gates and others

that ah meetings at White House to stop the export of dangerous technologies to Iraq. The following

day ah Mr. Kloskey resigned from the Government. We were told by Mr. Kloskey that the White

House, the people in that room representing the President argued for a policy that assisted Saddam

Hussein in getting dual use technologies. We had Congressman Rose who I know has been on your

show testifying about the grain sales being tied up with funding weapons to Iraq as well. So across

the government, this thing went on. It’s hard to believe that somebody like Mr. Gates in his position

didn’t know about it.

[Ted Koppel] – We are suggesting a lot more that he knew about it. We’re suggesting that he was

actively involved in it let me just pass on a little information that we have gathered today, having to

do with the Confirmation Hearings and was told earlier this afternoon. Alan Fryers, Senior Officer with

the CIA and Clair George are not likely to be testifying voluntarily, indeed Alan Fryers said he will not

be testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The White House, as we have all heard

throughout the day is putting on some pressure to get those Hearings underway before the August

recess, August 2nd, of course, the Senate goes into recess. Ah, and there are indications now that a

week from Monday, indeed the Hearings will begin, Mr. Gates will be asked to testify at that time, but

I’ve been also told that there is no way that the Hearing will no way be completed before the August

recess. And that Mr. Gates will be told that he will be recalled again after other witnesses have

testified, after the August recess. So these Hearing now, are destined to go into September.

[House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] – I think that

is terribly important, because we have to what we have to remember here, unlike other appointees of

the President, what the head of the CIA does is not transparent. If you’re the Secretary of Housing,

like Jack Kemp is, and I disagree with one of his programs, not only do I know about it, but the

average citizen knows about what Jack Kemp’s doing. Sometimes you agree with it and sometimes

you disagree with him. In the case of the Director of the CIA, as is clear from repeated experiences,

often times even the people in Congress were suppose to know about these activities are not

informed. This has to do with National Security the standard ought not be somebody that can get by

the Hearing process with White House pressure. The White House ought to be with us on this one, we

ought to make sure that we have someone fully discloses what is going on to the appropriate

committees and to Congress. Not someone involved in Iran Contra and not someone who hasn’t told

the entire truth. And not someone who is in question about these activities. This has to be a definitive

decision by the Congress, that this individual will come clean with the Congress and fulfill not just the

letter of the law, but the spirit of the law.






[Ted Koppel] – Alright, let me just interrupt here for a moment, because we’re down to our last

minute and a half or so, Alan, it is inevitable in this kind of investigation that you run into a lot of

sleazy characters and I just want to get from you for our audience some sense of how much of the

information that we have compiled here comes from the sleazy characters and how much comes from

the few that we can really rely upon?

[Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] – I think, ah Ted

the important thing to remember here is that we have had all kinds of allegations for the last three

months when our team has interviewed dozens of people, we’ve been acidulously cross checking and

we’ve waited to go ahead with this story until we’ve had very credible witnesses. Those who were

documented CIA operatives and those who were physically with Mr. Gates during those meetings, and

we asked some of them why would Mr. Gates take the risk and go out and meet with Mr. Cardoen and

get directly involved and get his hands dirty in these operations, especially as he was deputy director

of the CIA at the time himself. We were told that he went out because he wanted to give his

improvtoire in order to make sure the job got done. We’ve talked to a number of top people and cross

checked.

[Ted Koppel] – Alright, Alan Friedman thank you very much, Congressman Gejdenson, thank you

very much, I’ll be back in a moment.

END






Whistle-Blowing Activities – Starting in June of 1987, local, state, and federal authorities were

called by Stanley J. Caterbone, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Securities

and Exchange Commission, Congressman Robert Walker, the Pennsylvania Attorney General, the

Lancaster District Attorney, Manheim Township Police, and a host of others.

The following is a memo of a meeting with ISC executive Mr. Lawrence Resch and Mr. Stanley J.

Caterbone at his office at Financial Management Group, Ltd., which took place on June 23, 1987. Mr.

Lawrence Resch, of San Clamente, California, was a long time associate of Mr. James Guerin who

worked as a marketing consultant, and was an ISC executive prior to the company going public in

1982. He served as Director of Marketing and head of Lancaster operations for then defunct United

Chem Con, an affiliate of ISC. He was sued by Ferranti International in 1990 for $189 million dollars

and indicted and found guilty by prosecutors for his role with ISC and served a jail term.

Upon the arrival of Mr. Larry Resch, Stan Caterbone met him in the lobby of Financial Management

Group, Ltd, at which time Larry Resch said "Carl Jacobson could not attend, we had to suddenly fly him

out of the country early this morning (flew to Chile)” The meeting was started with the subject of the

financial difficulties of United Chem Con and possible alternatives. Larry Resch specifically addressed

the possibility of moving the operations of United Chem Con to another facility, with specific regards to

the Renovo Plant. Larry Resch specifically addressed the financing capabilities of Stan Caterbone,

along with possible management opportunities. Larry Resch also gave financial statements and

documents to Stan Caterbone for the latest fiscal year for United Chem Con. Stan Caterbone went on

to allege that United Chem Con had embezzled some $15,000,000 from the United States

Government for contracts that contained improprieties. Stan Caterbone also alleged improprieties of

International Signal & Control and James Guerin, with specific regards to its role in the United Chem

Con, and its business activities as related to government contracts. Stan Caterbone noted that he, as a

legal shareholder of International Signal & Control was concerned about improper business activities.

Larry Resch was taken by surprise by all of the above. Stan Caterbone became quite upset by the

evasiveness and the lack of specifics with regards to Larry Resch's conversation. In efforts to thwart

any further communication from James Guerin, United Chem Con, or International Signal & Control,

Stan Caterbone demanded a retainer fee of $10,000 before anyone contacted him again. “

The following is a transcript of a meeting with Agent Howard Eisler, of the Pennsylvania Securities

Commission on September 29, 1987. The meeting was solicited at the bequest of Agent Howard Eisler

supposedly for an investigation into securities violations at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

However, that also turned out to be untrue, or Agent Eisler also ignored all of the violations that

occurred at the company headquarters. The meeting lasted approximately 4 hours at the residence of

Stanley J. Caterbone. Also present were attorney Mr. Robert Byers, and client of Stanley J. Caterbone,

Mr. Millard Johnson. Agent Howard Eisler, in November of 1987, requested that Stanley J. Caterbone






put any complaints or grievances in writing and never did anything with information or testimony from

the meeting.

[Stanley J. Caterbone, ISC Shareholder; Founder Executive Vice President of Financial

Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - Chem Con is the big local

minority-held corporation that was doing a lot of Defense contracts-it was associated with ISC. They

went under last spring, beginning of the summer, and there was a lot of criminal allegations made,

none of them substantiated. And I was connected with that. They sent a board member in to see me a

week before this happened. Why. I don't know. Jim Christian owned it - now I hear rumors that I was

tied to ISC and I am close to several people in that organization. Why they sent someone’ in to

California to see me, I don't know. They wouldn’t answer me. They wanted me to talk to a guy from

D.C., New York, a guy from the Caribbean. I don't know what the hell is going on.

[Mr. Robert Byer, Criminal Attorney for Stanley J. Caterbone] – the supposition was - I don't

know how true it was a front for ISC.


Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - It was, I'll tell you why.

Because when Chem Con was started, back to their inception, you look at ISC's books. They didn't

have any money. Well, the fist thing Chem Con did was they went and got all that free money from

the government and you look where that money went. I bet I know where it went. This guy named

Guerin, James Guerin. And I know that they were selling contracts back. He runs ISC and he also has

his fingers pretty deeply into Chem Con. He's the one who started Chem Con, Guerin is the one who

started it.

[Mr. Millard (Bill) Johnson, Client of Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone] - Wasn't there some allegations

about a tie to Wedtech? (Defense Contractor of New York)


Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - You bet. They were tied, you'd

better believe they were tied with Wedtech. The same guys in Wedtech were invoked with ISC and

Chem Con. ISC is sold over the London Exchange. (I bought my shares from Pennsylvania State

Senator Gibson Armstrong) I owned a thousand shares. I sold it when things started to hit the fan-

they just did a multimillion dollar merger with a company in London. They probably think this is going

to cover their tracks. What they did was, they fronted all that money and started the contracts, went

bankrupt, and now the government is stuck for $18,000,000. I know right now in this town's

viewpoint, I stole money, I am insane, and I am a lunatic I tell you I will not condemn Jim Christian

until he tells to my face what happened. "I was framed and set up. I don’t know maybe Jim Christian

doesn't have the money. Maybe Guerin has it or somebody else has it.






__________________________________________________________________

ARGUMENT

__________________________________________________________________

Keith, 407 U.S. at 313-14. There, the Court explained that

[n]ational security cases . . . often reflect a convergence of First and Fourth Amendment values . . . .

Fourth Amendment protections become the more necessary when the targets of official surveillance

may be those suspected of unorthodoxy in their political beliefs. The danger to political dissent is acute

where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect ‘domestic

security.’

Id. The Court thus concluded that Fourth Amendment freedoms cannot properly be guaranteed if

domestic security surveillances may be conducted solely within the discretion of the Executive Branch.

The Fourth Amendment does not contemplate the executive officers of Government as neutral and

disinterested magistrates. . . . The historical judgment, which the Fourth Amendment accepts, is that

unreviewed executive discretion may yield too readily to pressures to obtain incriminating evidence

and overlook potential invasions of privacy and protected speech. . . . [T]his Court has never sustained

a search upon the sole ground that officers reasonably expected to find evidence . . . and voluntarily

confined their activities to the least intrusive means . . . . The Fourth Amendment contemplates a prior

judicial judgment, not the risk that executive discretion may be reasonably exercised.






CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 21, 2007, I have mailed by U.S. Postal Service, by electronic means, or by facsimile the foregoing paper to the following (funds permitted) : ANN BEESON Attorney of Record JAMEEL JAFFER MELISSA GOODMAN (admission pending) CATHERINE CRUMP (admission pending) National Legal Department American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004-2400 (212) 549-2500 MICHAEL J. STEINBERG KARY L. MOSS American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan 60 West Hancock Street Detroit, MI 48201-1343 (313) 578-6814 Kate Martin CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES 60 1 Thirteenth Street, N. W. 1120 19th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036 (202) 72 1-5650

Joseph Onek Erin N. Linder Sharon Bradford Franklin THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT 1025 Vermont Avenue, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 580-6920 Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. JENNER & BLOCK LLP S. 800 Suite 1200 South Washington, DC 20005 (202) 639-6095 JENNER & BLOCK LLP 330 N. Wabash Avenue N. W. Chicago, IL 60611 (312) 222-9350

Randy Gainer Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1501 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2600 Seattle, WA 98101 - 1688

Douglas N. Letter Thomas N. Bondy Anthony A. Yang Attorneys, Appellate Staff Washington, DC 20530 Civil Division, Room 7513 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530

Lucy A. Dalglish, Esq. Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie, Esq. Elizabeth J. Soja, Esq. 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, VA 22209-2211 (703) 807-2100 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Kathleen M. Sullivan Derek L. Shaffer Constitutional Law Center Stanford Law School 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 ANN BEESON Attorney of Record JAMEEL JAFFER MELISSA GOODMAN (admission pending) SCOTT MICHELMAN (admission pending) CATHERINE CRUMP (admission pending) National Legal Department American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004-2400 (212) 549-2500 [email protected] David W. DeBruin Theresa A. Chmara Julie M. Carpenter Michael B. DeSanctis Wade B. Gentz JENNER & BLOCK LLP 601 Thirteenth St., N.W., 12th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 tel. (202) 639-6000 fax (202) 639-6066 Margaret A. Costello DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 400 Renaissance Center Detroit, MI 48243 tel. (313) 568-5306 fax (313) 568-6893

____________/s/________________

Date: February 20, 2007 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 717-427-1821 facsimile






BAUSMAN MPO

THANK YOU FOR SHOPPING

WEIS MARKETS #41 LANCASTER, p~

CLUB CUSTOMER Ite. 40041389011 H8 VIENNA 60 Rice HB VIENNA 80 1.49 F COUPON 11009 1.49 F

MC MANUFACTURER CPN 1 .OD-F r*rr TAX 1.00-F

Cash .OO BAL .98

CwGE 1.00 cowon savines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .oZ

2.00 YOU- Total Savings are 6 7 . 1 1 ~ 2.00 2/20/07 4:14 PM 0041201 0129 225

PA

D r i ce , . . -

It$ I , ~ > ? ~ . ? C ; E E%S 1.2, F 1.00 T

LaTIOh 06 B ~ L 2.27 .*r. TAX 2.27

Cash .00

2/18

x X St

X

*

Sales Receipt Product Sale Uni t Final Descri p t i on Qty Pr ice Pr ice

LANCASTER PA 17604 First-Cless

1.50 oz.

Issue PVI :

PHILADELPHIA PA 19101 First-Cl ass

1.30 oz.

. Issue PVI:

DETROIT M I 48201 Fi rst-Cl ass

4.90 oz.

Issue PVI :

Total :

Paid by: Cash Change Due:

Bi l I # : 1000200788239 Clerk: 03

A l l sales f ina l on stamps and postage. Refunds for guaranteed services on1 y.

Thank you f o r your business. 1







mailto:[email protected] 717.427-1621 Fax

Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603

March 19, 2007 United States District Court Eastern District Of Michigan Southern Division The Clerk of The Court Detroit, MI Re: Brief On Behalf Of Amici Curiae Stanley J. Caterbone And Advanced Media Group In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Dear Clerk of the Court: Please see the attached for filing. On February 22, 2007, I did not have your address so I forwarded the filing to the ACLU Office in Detroit with a note to please forward it to you for filing. I have no way of confirming, so I am submitting another copy for you to file. I thank you for your service in advance. If you require any additional information, please contact me by email at the above address. Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone Pro Se Lititgant






Lancaster New Era: Dems' inaction on FISA harmful http://eedition.lancasteronline.com/pages/news/edition/NEPM/2008...

1 of 2 2/19/2008 4:21 PM

Lancaster New Era

Dems' inaction on FISA harmful

It's things like this that make us wonder how serious someDemocrats are about confronting the terrorist threat on America.

The Democratic-led House let a crucial government-eavesdropping law expire over the weekend before Congress began a 12-day recess.

The eavesdropping won't end; it just makes the task that much harder for our intelligence officials.

The House failed to adopt the bipartisan Senate version of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which would have renewed an update of the law approved in August that makes it easier for the government to spy on foreign phone calls and e-mails that pass through the United States.

FISA, first adopted by Congress during the Cold War, would let the government initiate wiretaps for up to one year. It also would compel telecommunications to comply with wiretap orders while shielding them from civil lawsuits that may be filed against them as a result.

The provisions in the law have one purpose and one purpose only: to protect the American people from further terrorist attacks.

"American citizens must understand, clearly understand that there's still a threat on the homeland...," says President Bush. "We've got to give our professionals the tools they need to be able to figure out what the enemy is up to so we can stop it."

Some Democrats apparently don't see it that way. They downplay FISA's expiration and accuse the president of fear-mongering and misrepresenting the facts.

"This is not about protecting Americans. The president just wants to protect American telephone companies," argues Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Illinois), referring to the liability-protection provision that insulates telecoms from lawsuits.

While the eavesdropping can continue, the compliance requirement and liability protection for telecoms no longer apply. That means telecoms' cooperation must be voluntary. And without the liability protection, they're less likely to be so.

As a result, the government has to go back to the old way of getting orders approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court -- a cumbersome process that ties intelligence agents up in red tape and causes needless delay.

To get a court order, the government has to prove "probable cause" before being allowed to tap a line inside the U.S. -- even if the communication originates and ends in a foreign country. This is difficult to do, and it takes time.

Indeed, by the time the government complies with the law, the phone numbers or e-mails that it wanted to track could be obsolete.

"More than likely we would miss the very information we need to prevent some horrendous act from taking place in the United States," says Mike McConnell, director of national intelligence.






Lancaster New Era: Dems' inaction on FISA harmful http://eedition.lancasteronline.com/pages/news/edition/NEPM/2008...

2 of 2 2/19/2008 4:21 PM

The law does makes provisions for emergencies, but the paperwork still must be completed within a few days.

Democrats who let the FISA law expire insist America is no less safe from another terrorist attack. But can they be so sure?

The only thing certain is that Americans are not now getting the full benefit of FISA protection. This is unacceptable.

We should be protecting the American people, not the terrorists.

The eavesdropping won't end; it just makes the task that much harder for our intelligence officials.

© 2004-2007 Lancaster Newspapers

PO Box 1328, Lancaster PA 17608, (717) 291-8811Terms of Service Privacy Policy






CI-08-13373 - IIS Windows Server

Documents

Transcript of CI-08-13373 - IIS Windows Server