Chapter I INTRODUCTION Background of the Study

Chapter IINTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

The Sultan Kudarat State University has a Student Body

Organization that aims to promote better understanding and

unity among the SKSU students who belong to different tribes

or culture, develop appreciation for moral and spiritual

values and to provide training for leadership through its

various social, educational and cultural programs and

activities.

The institution, Sultan Kudarat State University

Tacurong City Campus, responds to it and annually elects

Student Body Organizations Officer to achieve its aims.

The Student Body Organization Officers basically

performs the following tasks towards the students: Student

Relations, Dissemination of Information, Organizing School

Activities, Application Student Services and Project

Implementation. These services are the primary basis to

1

determine their Efficiency and Effects of the SBO Officers

to the Students.

Objectives of the Study

The objectives of the study are to determine the

efficiency of the SBO Officers, its effects on the Student

at Sultan Kudarat State University Tacurong City Campus and

their significant relationship.

1. To determine the efficiency of the SBO Officers in

terms of:

1.1 Student Relations

2

1.2 Dissemination of Information

1.3 Organizing School Activities

1.4 Application of Student Services

1.5 Project Implementation

2. To determine the effects of the SBO Officers efficiency

in terms of:

2.1 Student Relations

2.2 Dissemination of Information

2.3 Organizing School Activities

2.4 Application of Student Services

2.5 Project Implementation

3. To determine the relationship between the efficiency

of SBO Officers and its effects on the students.

Significance of the Study

3

The study is of great importance since it seeks for the

improvement of Student Leadership at Sultan Kudarat State

University Tacurong City Campus. This is done by determining

the Efficiency of the highest student leaders in the campus

(Student Body Organization Officers, SBO) from three (3)

different leadership terms (2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-

2011). After determining, the researcher finds the area

where the student leaders need improvement and suggest

better strategies in their performances for the development

of the future student leaders.

Scope and Delimitation of the Study

The researcher’s study is determining the Efficiency of

the SBO Officers and its Effects on the Students at Sultan

Kudarat State University, Tacurong City Campus academic year

2008-2011.

Time and Place of the Study

4

The study was conducted January 2012 at Sultan Kudarat

State University Tacurong City Campus.

Definition of Terms

The following terms used in the study of the SBO

Officers in SKSU Tacurong City Campus.

Dissemination of Information refers on how the SBO Officers

distribute information to the students inside the

campus.

Effects refer to the result of the efficiency of SBO

officers of SKSU-Tacurong City Campus. Example:

Actual Filled-up Survey Questionnaire no. 99 B.

EFFECTS, statement 2.b- Officers and Students have

complete attendance during the events in the

5

campus. This statement was rated with 5 which

describe as Always or Highly Effective (pg.47).

Efficiency refers to the degree of effectiveness of SBO

Officers in achieving their desired results with

minimum expenditures of energy, time, money or

materials. Example: Actual Filled-up Survey

Questionnaire no. 99 A. EFFICIENCY, statement 2.e-

Officers check attendance of students every

meeting. This statement was rated with 5 which

describe as Always or Highly Efficient (pg.45).

Project Implementation refers to the enactment of projects

agreed by the SBO Officers.

SBO Student Body Organization, refers to the organization

where in the students leaders involve in the study

is officiated.

6

SBO Officers refers to a group of student leaders under the

office of the Student Body Organization SKSU

Tacurong City Campus.

School Activities refers to athletic and socio-cultural;

events/programs in the campus

organized/facilitated by SBO Officers.

SKSU Sultan Kudarat State University refers to the State

University proclaimed January 2010 formerly known

as SKPSC (Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State

College), located in Sultan Kudarat.

SKSU Tacurong Campus refers to one of the pioneering campus

of SKPSC now SKSU and the place where this study

is conducted.

Student Relations refers to the interaction between the SBO

Officers and Student Population in the application

of dissemination of information, organizing of

7

school activities, student services and project

implementation.

Student Services refers to services rendered by the SBO

officers to the students.

Tacurong City refers to the component city of Sultan Kudarat

and the location of SKSU-Tacurong City Campus.

Chapter IIREVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

WORKERS EFFICIENCY

Self-efficiency it is the use of one’s abilities in

order to bring optimum results with least waste and stain.

Self-efficiency refers to self awareness and self-

development to realize one’s aspiration. In self-efficiency,

the worker independently tends to discover his

potentialities and fully enhance them which redound not only

to his own benefit but to the benefit of others as well.

8

Social or Group Efficiency, refers to human relations

connoting good teamwork and social efficiency. Getting along

with your fellow workers as you perform your job within and

outside the organization fosters work efficiency (Ramirez

and Beltran, 2004).

EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL EFFICIENCY

People who succeeded in business, politics and

profession have been found to have dependent much on their

ability to deal with people. The cultivation of appropriate

behavior in the organization and the community has been the

key to moving upward in social and economic terms. The

effectiveness of the individual in general has been based on

having the competence in human relations just as in

scientific and technological ability. The grouping emphasis

on the corporate character of business has accentuated

rather than lessened the need for personnel who possess the

skills in human relations which comprise the application of

learning in the social sciences (Azanza, 2001).

9

This efficiency results into the effectiveness of an

organization/group that develops specially on the executive

system of the organization.

TRENDS ON ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

Effective organization requires more and more that the

executive system be highly adaptable. Recognizing the need

for adaptability of the organization in a changing society

has resulted in some new practices. First among these is a

conscious planned approach to executive development so that

people of appropriate training and proven competence may be

available for assignment to key positions as needed.

Second is the use of the task force or the project form

of organization. This permits the assembly of personnel of a

variety of appropriate specialized competence for assignment

to the completion of a specific task or project in its

entirety. Such group can be created and broken up rapidly

and without a sense of unfairness on the part on the

individuals concern.

10

The forgoing two practices have been adopted recently

in the Philippines. Executive development has been given

emphasis with the inauguration of the Development Academy of

the Philippines at Tagaytay City. Task forces on development

projects have also been organized on national, regional,

provincial, city and municipal levels.

Thus organization in the future will be more and more

flexible as they become viable to varying needs of the times

(Leveriza, 1990).

Trends presented above may also be adapted by the

following organization.

STUDENT ORGANIZATION

There shall be a Student Body Organization which shall

aim to promote better understanding and unity among the

SKPSC students who belong to different tribes or culture,

develop appreciation for moral and spiritual values and to

provide training for leadership through its various social

and educational and cultural programs and activities (SKPSC

Handbook, 2004).

11

CAMPUS STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION

Each campus Student Body Organization shall be composed

of the following duly elected officers in the campus as

follows: Governor, Vice-Governor, and eight (8) Board

members.

The qualifications of SBO Officers shall be the

following:

Governor – Incoming regular college junior student in 4-year

curriculum or senior student in a 5-year curriculum. Must be

a bonafide student of SKSU.

Vice-Governor - Incoming regular college junior student (3rd

year in 4-year curriculum) or senior student 4th year in a

5-year curriculum. Must be a bonafide student of SKSU.

Board Member – incoming 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year in 5 year

curriculum regular college student. Must be a bonafide

student of SKSU.

12

A candidate for graduation or a graduating student (in

a 4 or 5 year curriculum) is not allowed to run in any

position.

Any SBO Officers may be elected as officer of other

organization except as mayor or chairman.

Other criteria or requirements may be added by the

campus SBO provided it should not contradict with the rules

of USG (SKSU Handbook, 2010).

SBO OFFICERS

S.Y. 2008-2009

Governor: Ronaisa Camendan

Vice-Governor: Nelbert Kulan

Secretary: Karen Sol Angeles Lumogdang

Treasurer: Jeffrech Mecida

Campus Representative: Melba Abid

Board Members: Maricel Albiño Ralph Salmon

Ramon Oca Michael Arenga

13

Edwin Balmores Princess Grace

Cabayao

Sherwin Estil (The Nucleus,

2008)

S.Y. 2009-2010

Governor: Irene Salim/ Deana Diaz

Vice-Governor: Maria Jenalyn Mejia

Treasurer: Joeben Aujero

Campus Representative: Michael Sacapaño

Board Members: Gessa Yu Marvin Antonio

Michael Landero Ralph Salmon

Krystal Gay Tolentino Aizel

Celeste

Jonjie Imperio (The Nucleus,

2009)

S.Y. 2010-2011

Governor: Jaime Eliarda

Vice-Governor: Jose Decena III

Secretary: Gay Flores

14

Treasurer: Anna Sheil Hilado

Campus Representative: Emil Mamalo

Board Members: Sam Delos Reyes Kevin Gajo

Bryan Dela Cruz Jonjie Imperio

Ralph Salmon Mark Arellano

Darlyn Vana Delfin Terre II

(The Nucleus, 2010)

THE ROLE OF THE YOUTH IN NATION BUILDING

The role played by the youth in nation-building has

caught the governments’ attention. Their dynamism and

activism opened the eyes and minds of the Filipino leaders

and functionaries for needed reform. The Filipino youth

throughout the country fearlessly challenged the corrupt

practices of their elders and the deaf ears of society and

initiated moves to start reform. Many young Filipinos served

their countrymen in the remote hinterlands, giving education

and services as imperative to political reform.

15

In return the state is bound to promote and protect the

youth’s section well-being as stated in Article II section

13.

“The State recognizes the vital role of the youth in

nation building and shall promote and protect their

physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual, and social well-

being. It shall inculcate in the youth patriotism and

nationalism, and encourage their involvement in public and

civic affairs.”

In their training and education the youth are taught

virtues of patriotism and nationalism. They are required to

study Philippine Literature, Government, History, civics and

the present constitution. They are encouraged to participate

in both public and civic affairs (Bederio et.al., 2004).

ROLE OF SCHOOL

The role of the educational system, whose curriculum is

often heavily impregnated with the politics, is even more

important in promoting a doctored political culture as the

16

political participation develops inside the club and

organization of the society in the future. The school has an

important part where a child starts to open up in the real

society, which is indoctrinated by political affairs,

Walherg et.al. (1997).

According to Guillermo (1998), education is a means by

which a reader achievers change for progress, stability, and

prosperity. Through its process, the students are imbued

worth proper and upright ideals, values, attitudes and

aspirations provided with good opportunities to get and

acquire essential knowledge and understanding habit and

opportunities skills.

Role of a school is to develop raw child to perfect.

But present system implication in poor and developing

countries is that perfect (high marks) child is given

opportunities to get enrolled to good schools or colleges

and if the child is less than the expectations is asked to

seek repetition according to Sadashivan Organization, 2005

(Diaz, 2010).

17

As part of the study, it is very important to know the

history of the school and city where the research is made in

order to determine the society where the organization is

resided.

HISTORY OF SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY

Sultan Kudarat State University formerly known as

Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State College was established

last 1990, by virtue of Republic Act 9673, otherwise known

as the SKPSC Charter and authorized by then Cong. Estanislao

Valdez of the Lone District of Sultan Kudarat in the House

of Congress and Senator Edgardo Angara in the Senate. Unlike

other State Colleges, SKPSC was established out of five (5)

previously DECS-supervised High School in five (5)

municipalities of the Province.

These High Schools are those in Tacurong, now Tacurong

City and site of the Institute of Arts and Sciences, Isulan,

some 12 kilometer west of Tacurong, where the Institute of

Industrial Technology, Computer Science, and Engineering is,18

Lutayan, some 35 kilometers southwest of Tacurong where the

Institute of Agriculture is, Kalamansig, some 7 hours by

land travel to the coast west of Tacurong and where the

Institute of Fishery Technology is, and Palimbang, some 8

hours of land travel to the coast southwest of Tacurong.

Its main campus and administrative center is in EJC

Montilla, 5 kilometer west of Tacurong, which is also the

site of the Laboratory High School, Institute of Teaching

Education and Institute of Graduate Studies, Institute of

Law and College of Nursing. As the only State College in the

province, resolution were made by the Local Government Units

of Sen. Ninoy Aquino, Bagumbayan and even Glan, Sarangani

for the opening of extension programs in the said

municipalities. Consequently, a Memorandum of Agreement was

drafted and signed between and among parties on April 2006,

December 16, 2004, and March 10, 2005.

For the last three years during the term of the then

President, Nelson T. Binag preparation were done for the

conversion of state college to university and for whatever

reasons the bill was archived. With the installation of the

19

new president, Dr. Teresita Llorente-Cambel, updating of the

document relative to university hood was again done. In

addition, several strategies were employed to meet the most

coveted university status since this was also prime concern

of the incumbent president. Hence, on January 18, 2010 by

virtue of Republic Act 9966, SKPSC was converted into Sultan

Kudarat State University as sponsored by Hon. Pax

Mangudadatu and Hon. Congressman Arnulfo F. Go in the House

of Congress and Senator Manuel Roxas, Senator Edgardo

Angara, Senator Panfilo Lacson and Senator Miguel Subiri in

Senate (Sultan Kudarat State University, 2010).

TACURONG CITY

Tacurong City is a 4th Class City in the Province of

Sultan Kudarat, Philippines. According to the 2010 Census,

it has a population of 90,477. Tacurong now has a total land

area of 15,340 hectares, the smallest in land area among the

12 municipalities that compose the new province of Sultan

Kudarat, created on November 22, 1973 by Presidential Decree

20

No. 341. Tacurong became a component city of Sultan Kudarat

in 2000 by virtue of Republic Act 8805 in September 2000

(NSCB, 2001).

21

Chapter IIIMETHODOLOGY

The study used the descriptive type of research design.

In this study, the researcher gathers information through

survey questionnaires drafted with due consultation and

approval from the Adviser, Statistician and English Critic.

Respondents of the Study

The respondents of the study were the one hundred (100)

fourth year students who are officially enrolled at Sultan

Kudarat State University, Tacurong City Campus from School

Year 2008-2011. The respondents were selected by their

official year of residency stated above. This implies that

they are fourth year student at present. The number of

respondents comes from 1/3 of the total fourth year

population of two hundred eighty six (286).

22

Data Gathering Procedure

The researcher wrote a request for the Campus Director

allowing her to conduct the study at SKSU-Tacurong City

Campus. Requested a copy of the list and number of fourth

year students and took the number of the 1/3 population for

each which is 100 respondents filling up the survey

questionnaire. 1/3 is used to have a strong and validated

output of the study. The researcher used Random Sampling

Technique in the study.

Data Gathering Instrument

The researcher together with her Adviser, Statistician

and English Critic outlined a survey questionnaire that has

two parts the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on

the student. Each part has five (5) terms: Student

Relations, Dissemination of Information, Organizing of

23

School Activities, Application of Student Services and

Project Implementation. These terms have five questions each

for a total of twenty five (25) items for Efficiency and

another twenty five (25) items for the Effects.

The Descriptive Rating Scale below was used by the

respondents in rating each item as referred to the thesis of

Diaz, 2010:

Scale Description 5 Always 4 Oftentimes 3 Sometimes 2 Seldom 1 Never

The Means that were computed from the response of the

Efficiency of SBO Officers was interpreted based on the

objectives of the researcher and the scale below:

Scale Interpretation 4.21-5.00 VeryEfficient 3.41-4.20 Highly

Efficient 2.61-3.40 ModeratelyEfficient 1.81-2.60 Slightly

Efficient

24

1.00-1.80 NotEfficient

The Means that were computed from the response on the

Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers was interpreted

based on the objectives of the researcher and the scale

below:

Scale Interpretation 4.21-5.00 VeryEffective 3.41-4.20 Highly

Effective 2.61-3.40 ModeratelyEffective 1.81-2.60 SlightlyEffective 1.00-1.80 NotEffective

To interpret the degree of relationship between the

Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on the Students,

the researcher used the following rating scale below, when

the range of correlation coefficient is near ± 1 there is a

strong relationship between the variables while if the range

is near ± 0 there is a weak or no relationship between the

25

two variables, as referred from Bluman, 1998 (Elementary

Statistics):

Scale Interpretation ± 0.91- ± 1.00 very high correlation, very

dependent relationship ± 0.71- ± 0.90 high correlation, marked

relationship ± 0.41- ± 0.70 moderate correlation, substantial

relationship ± 0.21- ± 0.40 slight correlation, definite but

small relationship ± 0.00- ± 0.20 low correlation, almost negligiblerelationship

Statistical Treatment

26

The responses on the level of Efficiency of SBO

Officers and its Effects on students were analyzed and

interpreted using the mean.

Formula:

M= OTxRTN

SM= sum of mean GM= sum of SM no. of items no.

of items

The Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r) was used to

solve for the significant relationship of the Efficiency of

SBO Officers and its Effects on students.

Formula:

r= N ( xy) - ( x) ( y)∑ ∑ ∑ √ [N ( x²) - ( x)²] [N ( y²) - ( y)²]∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

27

Legend: M- Mean ratingOT- Original

TallyRT- Rating

ScaleN- no. of

RespondentsSM- Section

MeanGM- Grand Mean

Legend:r- CorrelationCoefficientN- no. ofRespondentsxy∑ - sum of xyx∑ - sum of x

(efficiency)y∑ - sum of y

(effects)x²∑ - sum of x²y²∑ - sum of y²

Chapter IVPRESENTATION, ANALYSIS and INTERPRETATION of DATA

The respondents of the study were one hundred (100)

fourth year students of Sultan Kudarat State University

Tacurong City Campus that are officially enrolled and

studied at the University from Academic Year 2008-2011.

Efficiency of SBO Officers

The Efficiency of SBO Officers is determined by the

respondents by rating them in Student Relations,

Dissemination of Information, Organizing of School

Activities, Application of Student Services and Project

Implementation.

28

The responses were tallied, computed and presented in

the following tables.

Table 1.1 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers interms of Student

RelationsStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers give time to listen and

act upon the complaints of the students.

3.54 HighlyEfficient

b. Officers courteously entertain the students.


c. Officers provide seminars, trainings, workshops to the students.

2.99 ModeratelyEfficient

d. Officers inform the students about their basic profile.


29

e. Officers and students coordinate on every program.


Section Mean 3.42 HighlyEfficient

In terms of Student Relations, the respondents rated

the statement e as “Highly Efficient” with the highest mean

rating of 3.61 which implies that oftentimes, the officers

and students coordinate on every program. While statements c

has “Moderately Efficient” interpretation with the lowest

mean rating of 2.99 which means that sometimes, officers

provide seminars, trainings, workshops to the students, this

is due to the time-consuming process of acquiring funds and

the financial status of the students to provide their

registration fees. A section mean of 3.42 is given by the

respondents that is interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which

implies that majority of the statements above are oftentimes

done by the officers with efficiency. This is possible

through the cultivation of the connection between the

organization and the students that is the key to the

development of the institution (Emphasis on Social

Efficiency- Azanza, 2001).

30

Table 1.2 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Dissemination of

InformationStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers conduct student

consultation and meetings before sponsoring programs in the campus.


b. Officers post announcements for every event in the campus. 4.22 Highly

Efficientc. Officers coordinate with clubs

and department officers on every program in the campus.


d. Officers are updated on every event inside the university. 3.78 Highly

Efficiente. Officers check attendance every

meeting.4.16 Highly

EfficientSection Mean 3.90 Highly

Efficient

The Dissemination of Information conducted by the SBO

Officers was rated with a mean raging from 4.22 as the

highest and 3.57 as the lowest that have a section mean of

31

3.90 interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that

they oftentimes perform the above statements for

dissemination of information. This is due to the officer’s

access on basic materials for the task, such as office

computer and communications from different concerned

offices. Thus, connoting good teamwork among the group

fosters work efficiency (Worker’s Efficiency- Ramirez and

Beltran, 2004).

Table 1.3 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Organizing

School ActivitiesStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers follow the exact annual

32

activity plan of the campus. 3.89 HighlyEfficient

b. Officers hold programs with complete materials.


c. Officers start every program on time.


d. SBO programs are participated and attended by the students. 3.50 Highly

Efficiente. SBO programs are beneficial to the

students.3.60 Highly

EfficientSection Mean 3.46 Highly

Efficient

When Organizing School Activities the officers were

rated with “Highly Efficient” in statement a with the

highest mean of 3.89 which indicates that oftentimes they

follow the exact annual activity plan of the campus, while

statement c got the lowest rating of 2.96, interpreted as

“Moderately Efficient” which means that sometimes they start

every program on time, this is because of the limited time

allotted by the officers in preparation for the program and

the late arrival of the students and guest speakers. A

section mean of 3.46 is given by the respondents and

interpreted as “Highly Efficient,” which reveals that the

SBO Officers oftentimes Organize School Activities. This is

33

because the Youth; both officers and students are encouraged

to participate in public and civic affairs (The Role of the

Youth in Nation Building- Bederio et. al., 2004).

Table 1.4 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Application of

Student ServicesStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers provide basic necessities

of students during or before examinations. (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance sheets)


b. Officers facilitate symposiums or other seminars for the benefit of the students.


c. Officers give unbiased judgment onfinancial issues. (gathering of fines)


d. Officers conduct an orderly signing of clearance.

3.64 Highly Efficient

e. Officers satisfy the students after every sponsored program.


Section Mean 3.57 HighlyEfficient

34

As for the Student Services, the respondents rated the

officers with the highest mean of 3.88 that was interpreted

as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that oftentimes, they

provide basic necessities of students during or before

examinations (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance

sheets). While statement e got the lowest mean of 3.40 that

was interpreted as “Moderately Efficient” which implies that

sometimes, they satisfy the students after every program

this is because each student has a different way to be

satisfied. A section mean of 3.57 is given by the respondent

that is interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates

that oftentimes, the officers provide student services. This

is because the youth serves their countrymen for the

nation’s development (The Role of the Youth in Nation

Building- Bederio et. al., 2004).

35

Table 1.5 Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms of Project

ImplementationStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers provide programs that

cater the needs of the students. 3.42 HighlyEfficient

b. Officers consult the students before planning/proposing a project.


c. Officers implement the projects according to the exact annual activity plan of the office.


d. Officers’ projects are useful andbeneficial to the students.


e. Officers receive opinions/comments from the students through the suggestion box.


Section Mean 3.33 ModeratelyEfficient

The SBO Officers Efficiency in terms of Projects

Implemented was rated with the highest mean of 3.42 that is

interpreted as “Highly Efficient” which indicates that

oftentimes they provide programs that cater the needs of

students. Statement e on the other hand was rated 3.27 as

the lowest and interpreted as “Moderately Efficient” which

36

states that sometimes they consult the students before

planning/proposing a project. This is due to the time-

consuming process of consultation, long deliberation of

plans and different views of students. A section mean of

3.33 was given and interpreted as “Moderately Efficient”

which indicates that sometimes, the officers Implement

Projects using the statements above. This is because of the

grouping that emphasizes the need for personnel with the

skills in human relations to apply the above statements with

efficiency (Trends on Organization Development- Leveriza,

1990).

Table 1.6 Summary Responses on the Efficiency of SBO Officers

Statements Mean InterpretationStudent Relations 3.42 Highly

EfficientDissemination of Information


Organizing School Activities


Application of Student 3.57 Highly

37

Services Efficient Project Implementation


Grand Mean 3.54 HighlyEfficient

To summarize the mean for the efficiency of the SBO

Officers, the highest rating goes to Dissemination of

Information which is 3.90 interpreted as “Highly Efficient”

which implies that oftentimes, the officers disseminate

information. However, the Project Implementation garnered

the lowest mean of 3.33 that is interpreted as “Moderately

Efficient” which implies that sometimes, they implement

projects; this is due to the time-consuming process of

consulting the student population; asking for their approval

and facilitating the approved projects. A grand mean of 3.54

was given by the respondents and interpreted as “Highly

Efficient” which indicates that oftentimes they do the tasks

mentioned above with efficiency. This is because the groups

that succeed in their projects have been found to depend

much on their ability to deal with people, and this has been

38

the key to develop their outputs (Emphasis on Social

Efficiency- Azanza, 2001).

Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on Students

The Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers were

assessed by the respondents in terms of Student Relations,

Dissemination of Information, Organizing School Activities,

Application of Student Services and Project Implementation.

The responses were tallied, computed and presented in the following tables.

Table 2.1 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers on the

Students in terms of Student RelationsStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers adapt and apply the

suggestion of the students from their complaints.

3.54 HighlyEffective

b. Officers are treated with the samecourtesy they give to the students.


c. Officers and students are well-informed and knowledgeable. 3.41 Highly

Effectived. Officers are well-known by the 3.44 Highly

39

students. Effectivee. Officers and students conduct an

organized and efficient program.3.34 Moderately

EffectiveSection Mean 3.43 Highly

Effective

The Effects of the Efficiency of SBO Officers in terms

of Student Relations had the highest mean of 3.54 that is

interpreted as “Highly Effective” which indicates that

oftentimes, the officers are effective in adapting and

applying the suggestions of the students from their

complaints, while statement e had the lowest mean of 3.34

and interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which indicates

that sometimes the officers are effective in conducting an

organized and efficient program. This is because the ratio

of students and officers are unbalance that the students are

too hard to manage. A section mean of 3.43 was given by the

respondent that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which

implies that oftentimes the officer has an effective student

relations. The effectiveness of the individual in general

has been based on having the competence in human relations

40

just as in scientific and technological ability (Emphasis on

Social Efficiency- Azanza, 2001).


Students in terms of Dissemination of InformationStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. Officers conduct programs in the

campus with the application of student’s suggestions during consultation.


b. Officers and students have a complete attendance during the events in the campus.

3.32ModeratelyEffective

c. Officers harmonize with the club, department officers on every program.


d. Officers are actively participating on every event inside the university.


e. Officers document every attendanceof students during meetings. 3.65 Highly

EffectiveSection Mean 3.52 Highly

Effective

According to the respondents, the Effects of the SBO

Officer’s Efficiency in terms of Dissemination of

Information had the highest mean of 3.67 that is interpreted

41

as “Highly Effective” this implies that oftentimes they are

actively participating on every event inside the university.

On the other hand, the lowest mean of 3.32 was given to

statement b that is interpreted as “Moderately Effective”

which implies that sometimes, officers and students have a

complete attendance during the events in the campus. This is

because sometimes, the students and officers are requested

to report on their OJT or make-up classes with permission

and approval of the authorized personnel. A section mean of

3.52 was given by the respondent that is interpreted as

“Highly Effective” which implies that oftentimes the

officers are effective in Disseminating Information. This is

possible with the coordination among the co-officers that

creates effectiveness in working (Worker’s Efficiency-

Ramirez and Beltran, 2004).


Students in terms of Organizing School ActivitiesStatements Mean Interpretati

42

ona. Officers conduct activity on time

according to the annual activity plan of the campus.


b. Officers satisfy the student on every program

3.34 ModeratelyEffective

c. Officers finish every program on time.


d. SBO programs are conducted with complete participation of the students.


e. SBO programs increase the level ofawareness of the students 3.48 Highly

EffectiveSection Mean 3.39 Moderately

Effective

In terms of Organizing School Activities, the

respondents rated the SBO Officers with a highest mean of

3.60 that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which implies

that oftentimes they conduct activity on time according to

the annual activity plan of the campus. While a lowest mean

of 3.14 was given to statement c that is interpreted as

“Moderately Effective” which indicates that sometimes they

finish every program on time this is because of the result

on table 1.3 statement c that sometimes they also start the

program on time. A section mean of 3.39 was given by the

respondent that is interpreted as “Moderately Effective”

43

which implies that sometimes they are effective in

Organizing School Activities. Effective organization

requires the adaption of executive system. The need to

develop the executive branch by appropriate training is

essential (Trends on Organization Development- Leveriza,

1990).


Students in terms of Application of Student Services

Statements Mean Interpretation

a. Officers satisfy the student by providing them basic necessities during or before examinations (statement of accounts, receipts and clearance sheets)


b. Officers and students are well-coordinated due to symposium or other seminars facilitated by the organization.


c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased judgmenton gathering of fines.


d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessible area during


44

signing of clearance.e. Officers are fully-supported by

the students every sponsored program.


Section Mean 3.47 HighlyEffective

The Effects of SBO Officer’s Efficiency in terms of

Student Services was rated with the highest mean of 3.65

that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which indicates

that oftentimes, they satisfy the student by providing them

basic necessities during or before examinations (statement

of accounts, receipts and clearance sheets). While the

lowest mean of 3.30 that is interpreted as “Moderately

Effective” was rated to statement d which implies that

sometimes officers provide comfortable/accessible area

during signing of clearance this is due to the area of the

SBO Office that is small and limited to small number of

students at a time. A section mean of 3.47 was given by the

respondent that is interpreted as “Highly Effective” which

implies that oftentimes, officers are effective in Student

Services. This is due to the Officers’ dynamism and

45

activeness (The Role of Youth in Nation Building- Bederio

et. al., 2004).

Table 2.5 Responses on the Effects of the Efficiency of SBOOfficers on the

Students in terms of Project ImplementationStatements Mean Interpretati

ona. SBO projects are well-utilized by

the students.3.42 Highly

Effectiveb. Officers receive suggestions and

apply it on their projects.3.33 Moderately

Effectivec. Officers implement projects for

the students on time.3.16 Moderately

Effectived. Officers satisfy the needs of

students in terms of projects implemented.


e. Officers address opinions/commentsreceived from students through thesuggestion box.


Section Mean 3.30 ModeratelyEffective

According to the respondents, the Effects of the

Efficiency of SBO Officer’s in terms of Project

Implementation had the highest mean of 3.42 that is

interpreted as “Highly Effective” which indicates that

oftentimes, SBO projects are well-utilized by the students.

46

However, the lowest mean of 3.16 was rated to statement c

that is interpreted as “Moderately Effective” and indicates

that sometimes officers implement projects for the students

on time; this is due to the long-time processing in the

office concerned for the implementation of projects. A

section mean of 3.30 was given by the respondent that is

interpreted as “Moderately Effective” which implies that

sometimes the officers are effective in Project

Implementation. This is due to the inappropriate personnel

assigned to the key positions (Trends on Organization

Development- Leveriza, 1990).

Table 2.6 Summary Responses on the Effects of the Efficiencyof SBO Officers on

the StudentsStatements Mean Interpretati

onStudent Relations 3.43 Highly

Effective

47

Dissemination of Information 3.52 HighlyEffective

Organizing School Activities 3.39 ModeratelyEffective

Application of Student Services 3.47 HighlyEffective

Project Implementation 3.30 ModeratelyEffective

Grand Mean 3.42 HighlyEffective

Finally to summarize the Effects of the SBO Officer’s

Efficiency, the respondents rated them with the highest mean

of 3.52, interpreted as “Highly Effective” in Dissemination

of Information which implies that the officers are effective

in the said statement. However, Project Implementation got

the lowest mean of 3.30 that is interpreted as “Moderately

Effective” which indicates that sometimes officers are

effective in Project Implementation. A grand mean of 3.42 is

given to this table that is interpreted as “Highly

Effective” in doing the above statements. This is because

the Student Body Organization provides training for

leadership through its various social and educational and

cultural programs and activities (Student Organization-

SKPSC Student Handbook, Revised 2004).

48

Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its

Effects on the Students

The Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO Officers

and its Effects on the Students were computed using the

Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r).

Table 3 Correlation between the Efficiency of SBO Officers and its Effects on the

StudentsVariables r Degree of

relationshiptcomp.

Interpretation

Efficiency of SBOOfficers and itsEffects on the

Students

0.74

HighCorrelation,

MarkedRelationship

10.891

Significant

Relationship

r crit.=0.197 t crit. (0.5, 2 tailed) =1.985

49

The table reveals that the Efficiency of SBO Officers

and its Effects has a “High Degree of Correlation,” with an

r-value of 0.74 that is higher than the r-critical of 0.197

and the r-value is near to ± 1, this indicates that there is

a strong relationship between the pair. With t-computed of

10.891 which is higher than the t-critical of 1.985, the

correlation between the variables is interpreted having

“Significant Relationship.” This is because there is a

direct cause and effect relationship between the variables

if the t-computed is higher than the t-critical. That is;

the Efficiency of the SBO Officers causes Effectiveness in

their basic tasks. The interpretation stated above is

supported by Bluman in his book entitled Elementary

Statistics, Third Edition, 1998.

Chapter V

50

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSION and RECOMMENDATION

The study of the researcher aimed to determine the

Efficiency of the Student Body Organization Officers, its

Effects on the Students at Sultan Kudarat State University

Tacurong City Campus and its significant relationship. This

is because of the researcher seeks for the improvement of

Student Leadership in the above mentioned institution. After

gathering, presenting, analyzing and interpreting data, the

researcher finally made her summary, findings, conclusion

and recommendation.

SUMMARY

1. The Efficiency of Student Body Organization Officers

is determined by the respondents with a grand mean

of 3.54 which is interpreted as Highly Efficient.

All the terms are interpreted the same except for

the Project Implementation that is Moderately

Efficient.

51

2. The Effects of the Efficiency of Student Body

Organization on the Students is determined with a

grand mean of 3.42 as Highly Effective. Organizing

of School Activities and Project Implementation

however is interpreted with Moderately Effective.

3. The relationship of the Efficiency of Student Body

Organization Officers and its Effects on the

Students is determined as Highly Correlated with an

r-value of 0.74 and interpreted having Significant

Relationship.

FINDINGS

1. The researcher’s findings on the Efficiency of Student

Body Organization Officers are that their efficiency is

already well-performed. Only the Project Implementation

is interpreted as Moderately Efficient, the Officers

then have been doing their duties and responsibilities

with efficiency.

52

2. As to the Effects of the Efficiency, the respondents

determined it with an interpretation of Highly

Effective except for the Organizing of School

Activities and Project Implementation. This implies

that the efficiency of the Officers in the above

mentioned terms result in a lower interpretation.

3. Lastly, the finding of the researcher in the

relationship between the Efficiency of Student Body

Organization Officers and its Effects on the Students

is “Significant.” The pair is Highly Correlated with

each other.

53

CONCLUSION

1. The researcher concludes that there is already an

existing Efficiency among the Student Body Organization

Officers at Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong

City Campus. The Officers are functioning with high

efficiency except for the Project Implementation which

needs improvement due to its rating of 3.33 which is

interpreted as Moderately Efficient.

2. The result of the Effects of the Efficiency of Student

Body Organization Officer on the Students concludes

that the Officers are Highly Effective in Student

Relations, Dissemination of Information and Application

of Student Services. However, in Organizing School

Activities and Project Implementation they are rated

with 3.39 and 3.30 respectively and both interpreted as

Moderately Effective. The latter two needs to be

54

improved to further develop good leadership towards the

students.

3. The significant relationship between the Efficiency of

Student Body Organization Officers and its Effects on

the Students determine that there is a High Degree of

Correlation which means that the variables are

necessary for the development of both Student Body

Organization Officers and the Students.

RECOMMENDATION

The result of this study has come to its end and the

researcher finally summarizes the data, made her findings

and conclusion. The researcher now recommends the following

based on her conclusions:

55

1. To the Future Student Body Organization Officers, the

researcher recommends that they prioritize the Project

Implementation through the following plan of action:

Conduct a meeting with all the SBO Officers and plan

for the Project/s.

Make a Project Procurement Management Plan (PPMP)

based on the projects approved during the meeting.

Appendix no. 8 is an example of PPMP.

Make a Work and Financial Plan (WFP) based on the

approved projects during the meeting. Appendix no. 9

is an example of WFP.

Conduct another meeting to approve the PPMP and WFP.

If there is a problem during the making of these

documents, don’t hesitate to consult the following

campus offices for improvements: Cashiers Office,

Supply and Campus Director’s Office.

To avoid delay, be sure to follow the indicated time

duration on the documents.

56

2. As to the Effects of the Efficiency, Organizing School

Activities and Project Implementation have a moderately

effective interpretation. Therefore, the researcher

recommends that the future Student Body Organization

Officers should prioritize on the above mentioned tasks

by applying the plan of action stated on the first

recommendation.

3. Finally, the researcher recommends that the Student

Body Organization Officers should take the time and

effort to evaluate their Efficiency and Effects on

Students in order to record their performance, and be

the basis for improvement of the Future Student Body

Organization Officers. This maybe done by asking the

help of the Campus Administration in designing a

Standard Evaluation Tool specially for the SBO

Officers. It must be first presented to the concerned

offices for corrections/approval. This tool will be

used to determine whether the officers have done their

tasks with efficiency and effectiveness.

57

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. BOOKS

AZANZA, PATRICK ALAIN (2001), Human Behavior and Society,an Introduction to Social Sciences, printed by CachoHermanes, Inc. Pines cor. Union Sts, MandaluyongCity.

BEDERIO, CONCEPCION L., DELA ROSA, SIMEON J. JR.,FUNTECHA, HENRY F., GICAIN, MA. SOCORRO C., MENDOZA,MARTINA M., (2004), Philippine Government andConstitution, printed by Trinitas Publishing, Inc.,Trinitas Complex, Pantoc Road, Pantoc, Meycauayan3020, Bulacan.

58

LEVERIZA, JOSE P. (1990), PUBLIC ADMINISTRATING, theBusiness of Government, printed by Echanis PressInc. 760 Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong, Metro Manila.

RAMIREZ, LUZVIMINDA F. AND EDEN TONGSON-BELTRAN (2004),Man, Values Work Ethics, printed by TrinitasPublishing, Inc., Trinitas Complex, Pantoc Road,Pantoc, Meycauayan 3020, Bulacan.

SKPSC (2004), SKPSC Student Handbook (Revised 2004),E.J.C Montilla, Tacurong City.

SKSU (2009), SKSU Student Handbook (Revised 2009), ACCESSE.J.C. Montilla, Tacurong City

B. MAGAZINES

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VII no. 1 June-October (2008), SBOOFFICERS 2008, SKSU Tacurong City Campus TacurongCity

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VII no. 1 June-October (2009), SBOOFFICERS 2009, SKSU Tacurong City Campus TacurongCity

THE NUCLEUS, Vol. VIII no. 1 June-October (2010), SBOOFFICERS 2010, SKSU Tacurong City Campus TacurongCity

C. THESIS

DIAZ, DEANA (2010), Performances of KAMAGFIL Officers andIts Effects on Students of Sultan Kudarat StateUniversity, Tacurong City Campus, SKSU Tacurong CityCampus, Tacurong City.

59

D. INTERNET

NSCB, 2001, “Factsheet- 12 New Cities Created.”Retrieved July 30, 2011 fromhttp://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacurong_City

SKSU, 2010, “History of Sultan Kudarat StateUniversity.” Retrieved February 12, 2012 fromhttp://www.SKSU.edu

60

http://www.SKSU.edu/

APPENDICES

61

Appendix 1 Letter of Permission

Republic of the PhilippinesSULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITYCollege of Arts and Sciences

Tacurong City CampusJanuary 12, 2012

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D.Campus DirectorSKSU-Tacurong City Campus

Madam:

Greeting of wellness!!!

The undersigned student is currently undertaking aresearch study entitled “EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODYORGANIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTANKUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG CITY CAMPUS” as arequirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in SocialSciences major in Political Science.

In connection with this, may I request your good officeallowing me to conduct my research study utilizing theFourth Year students of SKSU-Tacurong City Campus asrespondents.

Hoping for your support and approval towards my request.

62

Thank You and More Power!!!Respectfully,

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE Researcher

Noted:

REYNALDO H. DALAYAP, Ph.D. REMEDIOS P. DELLERA, Ed.D. Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dean, Collegeof Hospitality Management

And Business Administration

Approved:

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D.

Campus DirectorAppendix 2 Survey Questionnaire

EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION AND ITS EFFECTSON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG

CITY CAMPUS

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Direction: Check the box parallel the question. Select your best answer based on the ratings below:

ScaleDescription 5 Always 4 Oftentimes 3 Sometimes 2 Seldom 1 Never

NOTE: Only the SBO Officers form S.Y 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 are subjects of this questionnaire.

63

A. EFFICIENCY

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers give time to listen and act upon

the complaints of the students.b. Officers courteously entertain the

students.c. Officers provide seminars, trainings,

workshops to the students.d. Officers inform the students about their

basic profile. e. Officers and students coordinate on every

program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct student consultation and

meetings before sponsoring programs in thecampus.

b. Officers post announcements for every event in the campus.

c. Officers coordinate with clubs and department officers on every program in the campus.

d. Officers are updated on every event insidethe university.

e. Officers check attendance every meeting.

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers follow the exact annual activity

plan of the campus.b. Officers hold programs with complete

64

materials.c. Officers start every program on time.d. SBO programs are participated and attended

by the students.e. SBO programs are beneficial to the

students.

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers provide basic necessities of

students during or before examinations. (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance sheets)


c. Officers give unbiased judgment on financial issues. (gathering of fines)



5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers provide that cater the needs of

the students.b. Officers consult the students before

planning/proposing a project.c. Officers implement the projects according

to the exact annual activity plan of the office.

d. Officers’ projects are useful and beneficial to the students.


B. EFFECTS

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers adapt and apply the suggestion of

65

the students from their complaints.b. Officers are treated with the same

courtesy they give to the students.c. Officers and students are well-informed

and knowledgeable.d. Officers are well-known by the students.e. Officers and students conduct an organized

and efficient program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct programs in the campus

with the application of student’s suggestions during consultation.




e. Officers document every attendance of students during meetings.

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct activity on time



c. Officers finish every program on time.d. SBO programs are conducted with complete

participation of the students.e. SBO programs increase the level of

awareness of the students66

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers satisfy the student by providing

them basic necessities during or before examinations (statement of accounts, receipts and clearance sheets)

b. Officers and students are well-coordinateddue to symposium or other seminars facilitated by the organization.

c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased judgment on gathering of fines.

d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessible area during signing of clearance.

e. Officers are fully-supported by the students every sponsored program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1a. SBO projects are well-utilized by the

students.b. Officers receive suggestions and apply it

on their projects.c. Officers implement projects for the

students on time.d. Officers satisfy the needs of students in

terms of projects implemented.e. Officers address opinions/comments

received from students through the suggestion box.

Appendix 3 Actual Filled-up Survey Questionnaire no. 99

EFFICIENCY OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION AND ITS EFFECTSON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG

CITY CAMPUS

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

67

Direction: Check the box parallel the question. Select your best answer based on the ratings below:

ScaleDescription 5 Always 4 Oftentimes 3 Sometimes 2 Seldom 1 Never

NOTE: Only the SBO Officers form S.Y 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 are subjects of this questionnaire.

A. EFFICIENCY

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers give time to listen and act upon

the complaints of the students.b. Officers courteously entertain the

students.c. Officers provide seminars, trainings,

workshops to the students.d. Officers inform the students about their

basic profile. e. Officers and students coordinate on every

program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct student consultation and

meetings before sponsoring programs in thecampus.

b. Officers post announcements for every event in the campus.

c. Officers coordinate with clubs and department officers on every program in the campus.

d. Officers are updated on every event insidethe university.

68

e. Officers check attendance every meeting.

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers follow the exact annual activity

plan of the campus.b. Officers hold programs with complete

materials.c. Officers start every program on time.d. SBO programs are participated and attended

by the students.e. SBO programs are beneficial to the

students.

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers provide basic necessities of

students during or before examinations. (statement of accounts, receipts, and clearance sheets)


c. Officers give unbiased judgment on financial issues. (gathering of fines)



5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers provide that cater the needs of

the students.b. Officers consult the students before

planning/proposing a project.69

c. Officers implement the projects according to the exact annual activity plan of the office.

d. Officers’ projects are useful and beneficial to the students.


B. EFFECTS

1. Student Relations 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers adapt and apply the suggestion of

the students from their complaints.b. Officers are treated with the same

courtesy they give to the students.c. Officers and students are well-informed

and knowledgeable.d. Officers are well-known by the students.e. Officers and students conduct an organized

and efficient program.

2. Dissemination of Information 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct programs in the campus

with the application of student’s suggestions during consultation.




e. Officers document every attendance of students during meetings.

70

3. Organizing School Activities 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers conduct activity on time



c. Officers finish every program on time.d. SBO programs are conducted with complete

participation of the students.e. SBO programs increase the level of

awareness of the students

4. Application of Student Services 5 4 3 2 1a. Officers satisfy the student by providing

them basic necessities during or before examinations (statement of accounts, receipts and clearance sheets)

b. Officers and students are well-coordinated due to symposium or other seminars facilitated by the organization.

c. Officers are trusted by the students to give unbiased judgment on gathering of fines.

d. Officers provide a comfortable/accessiblearea during signing of clearance.

e. Officers are fully-supported by the students every sponsored program.

5. Project Implementation 5 4 3 2 1a. SBO projects are well-utilized by the

students.b. Officers receive suggestions and apply it

on their projects.c. Officers implement projects for the

students on time.d. Officers satisfy the needs of students in

terms of projects implemented.

71

e. Officers address opinions/comments received from students through the suggestion box.

Appendix 4 Table of the Mean Rating for the Efficiency of SBO Officers

SOLVING FOR THE MEAN RATING OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SBOOFFICERS

1. STUDENT RELATIONS

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 4 9 35 32 19 350 3.54b. 3 8 33 34 19 349 3.60c. 13 24 29 19 15 299 2.99d. 8 13 31 27 19 330 3.37e. 3 11 27 37 20 354 3.61

Mean 3.42

2. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 7 11 23 36 23 357 3.57b. 1 3 19 27 50 422 4.22c. 3 6 29 32 29 375 3.79d. 3 8 25 36 28 378 3.78e. 1 5 19 27 48 416 4.16

Mean 3.90

3. ORGANIZING SCHOOL ACTIVITIES

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 1 8 21 40 29 385 3.89b. 3 14 36 37 10 337 3.37c. 13 20 35 22 10 296 2.96

72

d. 2 9 43 28 17 346 3.50e. 3 9 32 33 20 349 3.60

Mean 3.46

4. APPLICATION OF STUDENT SERVICES

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 2 7 26 30 34 384 3.88b. 4 17 25 29 25 354 3.54c. 5 17 33 23 22 340 3.40d. 5 12 24 32 27 364 3.64e. 5 14 35 27 18 336 3.40

Mean 3.57

5. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 6 9 34 39 12 342 3.42b. 9 14 30 33 13 324 3.27c. 5 20 31 26 18 332 3.32d. 5 18 31 28 18 336 3.36e. 10 17 23 30 20 333 3.33

Mean 3.33

73

Appendix 5 Table of the Mean Rating for the Effects of the Efficiency of SBO

Officers on the Students

SOLVING FOR THE MEAN RATING FOR THE EFFECTS OF THEEFFICIENCY OF SBO OFFICERS

1. STUDENT RELATIONS

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 4 9 36 31 20 354 3.54b. 3 13 35 35 14 344 3.44c. 1 14 42 29 14 341 3.41d. 3 17 28 37 15 344 3.44e. 4 15 42 21 18 334 3.34

Mean 3.43

74

2. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 7 9 33 30 21 349 3.49b. 9 15 28 29 18 329 3.32c. 3 15 31 32 19 349 3.49d. 3 8 32 30 25 360 3.67e. 5 9 30 24 29 354 3.65

Mean 3.52

3. ORGANIZING SCHOOL ACTIVITIES

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 5 9 33 26 26 356 3.60b. 8 12 33 3 16 331 3.34c. 13 15 32 21 17 308 3.14d. 7 16 26 30 20 337 3.40e. 4 13 33 27 22 345 3.48

Mean 3.39

4. APPLICATION OF STUDENT SERVICES

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 2 8 37 29 24 365 3.65b. 1 9 37 35 18 360 3.60c. 5 16 26 34 18 341 3.44d. 8 19 27 22 21 320 3.30e. 8 16 26 29 20 334 3.37

Mean 3.475. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

ItemsRating Scale

Total Mean1 2 3 4 5a. 8 13 26 35 18 342 3.42b. 9 15 30 26 20 333 3.33c. 7 21 35 23 14 316 3.16d. 7 19 33 25 16 324 3.24e. 8 14 31 28 19 336 3.36

Mean 3.30

75

Appendix 6 Table of (Efficiency) x, (Effects) y, xy, x², y²

R

Efficiencyx

Effectsy xy x² y²

1. 3.88 3.72 14.4336 15.05 13.842. 2.52 1.8 4.536 6.35 3.243. 4.56 1.8 8.208 20.79 3.244. 4.16 4.52 18.8032 17.3 20.435. 3.92 3.84 15.0528 15.37 14.756. 3.68 4.2 15.456 13.54 17.647. 4.04 4.08 16.4832 16.32 16.648. 3.12 2.88 8.9856 9.73 8.299. 3.16 2.88 9.1008 9.99 8.2910. 4.88 4.88 23.8144 23.81 23.8111. 4.08 3.4 13.872 16.64 11.5612. 2.96 2.84 8.4064 8.76 8.0713. 4.08 3.6 14.688 16.64 12.9614. 3.36 3.13 10.5168 11.29 9.815. 3.91 4.12 16.1092 15.29 16.9716. 3.32 2.92 9.6944 11.02 8.5317. 3.44 3.35 11.524 11.83 11.2218. 3.32 3.36 11.1552 11.02 11.2819. 4.04 3.54 14.3016 16.32 12.5320. 3.64 3.76 13.6864 13.25 14.1421. 2.48 2.28 5.6544 6.15 5.222. 2.8 2.32 6.496 7.84 5.3823. 3.8 4.16 15.808 14.44 17.3124. 3.8 4.24 16.112 14.44 17.9825. 4.4 4.16 18.304 19.36 17.3126. 4 4.12 16.48 16 16.9727. 4.24 4.64 19.6736 17.97 21.5328. 3.52 3.64 12.8128 12.39 13.2529. 4.64 4.36 20.2304 17.97 1930. 4.56 4.84 22.0704 20.79 23.4331. 3.64 2.68 9.7552 13.25 7.1832. 3.44 3.32 11.4208 11.83 11.0233. 3.66 3.28 12.0048 13.4 10.76

77

34. 3.68 3.12 11.4816 13.54 9.7335. 3.2 3.36 10.752 10.24 11.2936. 3.36 3.48 11.6928 11.29 12.1137. 3.24 3.28 10.6272 10.5 10.7638. 3.16 3.48 10.9968 9.99 12.1139. 3.88 3.84 14.8992 15.05 14.4540. 2.6 2.28 5.928 6.76 5.1941. 3.84 2.96 11.3664 14.74 8.76

Appendix 6. Continued…

R

Efficiencyx

Effectsy xy x² y²

42. 3.16 3.6 11.376 9.99 12.9643. 3.17 3.48 11.0316 10.05 12.1144. 2.38 2.46 5.8548 5.66 6.0545. 2.84 2.52 7.1568 8.07 6.3546. 3.68 4.04 14.8672 13.54 16.3247. 3.36 3.4 11.424 11.29 11.5648. 3.04 3.04 9.2416 9.24 9.2449. 3.36 2.16 7.2576 11.29 4.6750. 2.52 2.64 6.6528 6.35 6.9751. 3 2.6 7.8 9 6.7652. 2.25 2.16 4.86 5.06 4.6753. 3 3.24 9.72 9 10.554. 3.12 3.16 9.8592 9.73 9.9955. 4.64 4.48 20.7872 21.53 20.0756. 4.84 4.52 21.8768 23.43 21.8857. 2.92 3.08 8.9936 8.53 9.4958. 3.64 3.7 13.468 13.25 13.6959. 3.67 3.44 12.6248 13.47 11.8360. 3.84 3.52 13.5168 13.21 12.3961. 4.6 4.44 20.424 21.16 19.7162. 2.92 2.36 6.8912 8.53 5.5763. 1.44 1.6 2.304 2.07 2.5664. 4.16 4.68 19.4688 17.31 21.965. 4.24 4.24 17.9776 17.98 17.9866. 3.48 3.64 12.6672 12.11 13.25

78

67. 2.8 2.24 6.272 7.84 17.9868. 4.52 4.32 19.5264 20.43 18.6669. 4.58 3.92 17.9536 20.98 15.3770. 2.67 2.5 6.675 7.13 6.2571. 3.79 2.2 8.338 14.36 4.8472. 3.96 4.04 15.9984 15.68 16.3273. 3.8 4.24 16.112 14.44 17.9874. 3.6 2.87 10.332 12.96 8.2475. 2.96 3.36 9.9456 8.76 11.2976. 1.71 3.65 6.2415 2.92 13.3277. 3.6 3.8 13.68 12.96 14.4478. 1.64 1.44 2.3616 2.69 2.0779. 3.2 3.4 10.88 10.24 11.5680. 4.36 3.08 13.4288 19 9.4981. 2.76 2.08 5.7408 7.62 4.3382. 4.68 4.72 22.0896 21.9 22.28

Appendix 6. Continued…

R

Efficiencyx

Effectsy xy x² y²

83. 2.38 3.88 9.2344 5.66 15.0584. 4.52 4.36 19.7072 20.43 1985. 1.71 1.92 3.2832 2.92 3.6986. 4 4.04 16.16 16 16.3287. 3.72 3.46 12.8712 13.84 11.9788. 4.8 4 19.2 23.04 1689. 4.04 4.08 16.4832 16.32 16.6490. 2.76 2.92 8.0592 7.62 8.5391. 3.04 2.72 8.2688 9.24 7.492. 4.84 5 24.2 23.43 2593. 4.84 4.92 23.8128 23.43 24.2194. 4.84 4.92 23.8128 23.43 24.2195. 4.12 3.88 15.9856 16.97 15.0596. 2.68 2.52 6.7536 7.18 6.3597. 3.92 4.28 16.7776 15.37 18.3298. 3.92 3.36 13.1712 15.37 11.2999. 2.54 2.48 6.2992 6.45 6.15

79

100. 3.28 2.6 8.528 10.75 6.76Total 353.86 341.86 1259.6789 1306.46 1252.78

Appendix 7 Solving for the Relationship between the Efficiency of SBO

Officers and its Effects on the Students usingthe Pearson Product

Moment Correlation

r= N ( xy) – ( x) ( y)∑ ∑ ∑

√ [N ( x²) – ( x)²] [N ( y²) – ( y)²]∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

r= 100(1259.6789) – (353.86) (341.86)

80

√ [100 (1306.46) – (353.86)²] [100 (1252.78) – (341.86)²]

r= 125,967.89 – 120,970.57 √ (130,646 – 125,216.89) (125,278– 116,868.25)

r= 4997.32 √ (5429.11) (8409.75)

r= 4997.32 √ 45,657,457

r= 4997.32 6757.0301

r= 0.7395734

r= 0.74

Appendix 8 Example of Projected Procurement Management Plan

81

Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITYTacurong City Campus, Tacurong City

PROJECTED PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PLANOFFICE OF THE STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION

No. Item Description Quantity

Estimated Cost

Sourceof Funds

Remarks

1 School Activities and Programs

59,000.00

SBO Fund

2 Seminars Trainings and Workshop

87,000.00

SBO Fund

3Meals and Snacks

13,000.00

SBO Fund

4Petty Cash

5,000.00

SBO Fund

5Uniform and ID

20 persons

6,600.00

SBO Fund

6Projects

45,000.00

SBO Fund

7Financial Assistance

10,000.00

SBO Fund

8 Scissors 3 pcs. SBO Fund9 8.5x13 book paper 2 rims SBO Fund10 8.5x11 book paper 2 rims SBO Fund11 No. 2 Mongol Pencil 5 pcs. SBO Fund12 Eraser Big (white) 5 pcs. SBO Fund13 Stapler (big) 2 pcs. SBO Fund14 Staple wire 2 boxes SBO Fund15 Expandable Folder (long) 1 dozen SBO Fund16 Pilot fine pen (black) 1 dozen SBO Fund17 Highlighting pen 2 SBO Fund18 Expandable Envelop

(long)1 dozen SBO Fund

19 Masking tape 1” big 5 pcs. SBO Fund20 Yellow pad paper 5 pads SBO Fund21 Record Notebook 90’s 2 pcs. SBO Fund22 Dust pan 2 pcs. SBO Fund23 Soft Broom 2 pcs. SBO Fund24 HP deskjet Ink Advantage

2010 Ink Refill2 refills

SBO Fund

82

Purpose: To be used for the office transactions of the Student Body Organization S.Y. 2011-2012.

Requested by: Noted: ANN RIZA E. PIROTE EDGAR MARAVILLOSA

SBO Governor SBO Adviser

Recommending Approval:

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D. REX F. DAPITAN, MPA Campus Director VP for Finance

Approved:

TERESITA L. CAMBEL, Ed.D.SKSU President

Appendix 9 Example of Work and Financial PlanRepublic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITYTacurong City Campus, Tacurong City

WORK AND FINANCIAL PLANCALENDAR YEAR 2011-2012

Office of the Student Body Organization

BannerPrograms/Proj

ectActivities/Strategies

TimeTable/Dura

tion

In-charge/PersonsInvolved

Proposed

Budget

Sourceof Funds

Remarks

School Activities and Programs

SBO Officers shall prepare necessary materials for the program suchas Decorations, Sound System, Venue Rentals and Honorarium for Guest Speakers.a. Acquaintance Party July 2011

SBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

b. Nutrition Month

July 2011 SBO Officers

3,000.0

SBO Fund

83

Celebration 0

c. Buwan ng WikaAugust 2011

SBO Officers

3,000.00 SBO Fund

d. Intramural Meet

August2011

SBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

e. Intercampus Meet

December2011

SBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

f. Christmas Party

December2011

SBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

g. Kambuniyan Festival January12

SBO Officers

3,000.00 SBO Fund

h. Valentines Escapade

February2012

SBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

Seminars Trainings andWorkshop

SBO Officers shall be sent to Seminars/Trainings/ Workshops to further develop their skills and knowledge. (Note: Travels should provide invitations/communications andis related to their obligations as SBO Officers)

SBO Officers SBO Fund

a. USG Leadership Training June 2011SBO Officers

12,000.00 SBO Fund

b. VMRYLE (Visayas and MindanaoRizal Youth Leadership Seminar)

October-November

2011SBO Officers

25,000.00 SBO Fund

c. RYLE (Rizal Youth Leadership Seminar)

December2011

BO Officers

50,000.00 SBO Fund

BannerPrograms/Proj

ectActivities/Strategies

TimeTable/Dura

tion

In-charge/PersonsInvolved

Proposed

Budget

Sourceof Funds

Remarks

Meals and Snacks

Meals and Snackswill be providedto SBO Officers,Faculty and Staff during programs/meeting

June 2011-March 2012

SBO Officers

13,000.00

SBO Fund

84

s.

Petty Cash

SBO Office shallbe provided withPhp. 500.00/mon.for emergency fund which will be allocated fortransportation expenses of the Officers during emergency meetings and other official businesses.


SBO Officers

5,000.00

SBO Fund

Uniform and ID

Contact agenciesthat can provideservices for T-shirt Printing and ID lay outing. July 2011

SBO Officers

6,600.00

SBO Fund

Projects

Canvass for the materials of projects on agencies/companies that can provide the former.


SBO Officers

a. Bar Code Computer Program

SBO Officers

5,000.00 SBO Fund

b. Street LightSBO Officers

30,000.00 SBO Fund

c. Digital CameraSBO Officers

10,000.00 SBO Fund

Prepared by:

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE SBO Governor

Noted:

EDGAR MARAVILLOSA GENOVEVA E. PAUYA, Ph.D.

SBO Adviser Campus Director

85

JASMIN C. ABING REX F. DAPITAN, MPA Director for Student Affairs VP for Finance

Approved:

TERESITA L. CAMBEL, Ed. D.SKSU President

Appendix 10 Form 7Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITYCollege of Arts and Sciences

City of TacurongFebruary 15, 2012

APPLICATION FOR THESIS FINAL DEFENSE EXAMINATION

Name: ANN RIZA E. PIROTE Degree/Major: BASSPOLITICAL SCIENCEThesis Title: EFFICIENCY OF STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATIONOFFICERS AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARATSTATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG CITY CAMPUS.Check whether First ( ⁄ ) Second ( ) or Third( ) ExaminationDate of Exam: FEB. 17, 2012 Time: 1:00 PM Place: OFFICE OF THECAMPUS DIRECTOR

MEMBERS OF THE EXAMINING COMMITTEE(At least 3 including the adviser)

Name Signature Date

GENOVEVA B. PAUYA, Ph.D. _________________ February15, 2012

NORMA P. ULANGKAYA____ _________________ February15, 2012

86

NOEL O. OCTAVIANO, MA__ _________________ February15, 2012

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:

RODELYN M. DALAYAP, Ph. D. GENOVEVA B. PAUYA,Ph. D.

Research Chairman Campus Director

REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION(Indicate whether passed or failed under remarks)

Signature DateRemarks

_________________________ February 17, 2012

Passed

_________________________ February 17, 2012

Passed

_________________________ February 17, 2012

Passed

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED:

RODELYN M. DALAYAP, Ph. D. GENOVEVA B. PAUYA,Ph. D.

Research Chairman Campus Director

Appendix 11 Form 9Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITYCollege of Arts and Sciences

City of Tacurong

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

87

CERTIFICATION OF ENGLISH CRITIC

This is to certify that the thesis entitled “EFFICIENCY

OF STUDENT BODY ORGANIZATION OFFICERS AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE

STUDENTS AT SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY TACURONG CITY

CAMPUS” of ANN RIZA E. PIROTE was edited by the undersigned

on March 28, 2012.

CHRISTOPHER B. BLASURCA

Name and Signature of English Critic

NOTED:

EDGAR C. MARAVILLOSA Department Chairman

88

NOTE: This certificate should be submitted to the ResearchChairman prior to the approval/reproduction of thismanuscript.

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Love and attraction brought two different people as

one. Harriet and Joselito took a chance of living together

until their eldest daughter was born. Ann Riza Echavarri

Pirote took her first breath September 2, 1989 with the

presence of her parents and grandmother, Lola Anita as

Komadrona in a small house at Makati City. Weighing 8lbs.,

it was hard for her mother to deliver such offspring.

Ann grew as a spoiled child until her brother was born.

Her parents are so supportive of their studies that Ann

became active in her pre-school days. She graduated at Saint

Micheal Early Learning Center as Pre-school student and

studied at South Cembo Elementary School from grade 1 and 2.

She then had a younger sister to add in the family. Before

ending the school year 1998, her father died out of Cardiac

Arrest March 16, 1998. Ann and her family was left with her

tito Mao (the younger brother of Ann’s father). Due to a

very hard living at Manila, Ann’s family had to transfer

89

residence from one place to another so as her school until

they have decided to go home to Mindanao. By the year 1999,

Ann went to Montessori Learning Center as a 4th grade

Student, 5th grade at Tacurong Pilot Elementary School and

graduated her elementary at Baras Elementary School in the

year 2001 as Class Salutatorian.

High School was very frustrating for Ann as her mother

and Tito Mao decided to get married and had a child. Because

of her elementary achievement, Ann enrolled at Notre Dame of

Tacurong for Girls with a scholarship. Unluckily, she

started to feel unhealthy and diagnosed with a Mild

Rheumatic Heart Disease which required her to live in a

healthy environment. She then transferred to her mother’s

home town Baras and studied at Apolinario S. Bernardo

Memorial High School as a second year student and graduated

with honors. Ann applied for MSU-SASE scholarship and passed

but her mother didn’t allow her to study at MSU Marawi to

take up BS Psychology because of her sickness.

90

Ann enrolled at Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State

College (SKPSC) now Sultan Kudarat State University Isulan

Campus by 2006 as a Civil Engineering student. It was a very

difficult time for her because it wasn’t her field of

expertise. By second semester of 2007 she transferred at

SKPSC-Tacurong Campus and shifted to a course of Bachelor of

Arts in Social Science major in Political Science.

Studying at SKPSC now SKSU brought so many

opportunities to Ann; she became an Associate Editor-in-

Chief of Isulan Campus’ Publication (Technopipeline) 2006-

2007, Peer Helper, and Band Vocalist (Red Fox) of the same

year and campus. It continued as she was appointed Editor-

in-Chief of Tacurong Campus Publication (The Nucleus) for

two consecutive years, the first to be Chief Editor of

Triumph (The Official Yearbook Publication of SKSU) by 2010,

Department Mayor of BASS Political Science, and now SBO

Governor 2011-2012.

As her life passed by, she then realized that studying

college at this Institution for 6 years was very fulfilling.

91

Accomplishing such experience made her prepared for another

leap of faith. A child to a young woman, with no regrets and

filled with hope for a successful future.

ANN RIZA E. PIROTE Researcher

92

Chapter I INTRODUCTION Background of the Study

Documents

Transcript of Chapter I INTRODUCTION Background of the Study