Chapter 8 USING YOUR AGENCY - Oxford University Press
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Chapter 8 USING YOUR AGENCY - Oxford University Press
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
Chapter 8: USING YOUR AGENCY The basic premise of the chapter is that the employing human service
organization profoundly affect a practitioner’s personal and professional well-
being. This chapter introduces students to the characteristics and dynamics of human
service agencies. Organizational structure, culture, and management strongly
influence what services community practitioners and social workers do, how well
and in what manner they do it, that is, how well and with what autonomy they are
able to do the professional work for which we are trained. Our work organizations
affect our self-image, our livelihoods, and our sense of accomplishment and worth
as human beings. Human services agencies are undergoing a sea change in
structure and operation: privatization, proprietarization, contingent and
contractual employment, decentralization and becoming virtual. This is true for
agency employed social workers and proprietary social workers receiving third-
party payments. Therefore, community practitioners and social workers need to
understand how organizations work and how to put that knowledge to use in
attaining personal and professional goals within and with social agencies.
Key Concepts Stressed in Chapter Agencies are evolving and the important concepts are expanding. The key
concepts are: Attributes of human service organization, bureaucracy, hierarchy,
division of labor, authority and power, organization chart, board of directors;
117
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
Systems, open and loosely coupled system, rational organizational system, intra and
inter-organizational systems; Human service technologies; Entrepreneurial agencies;
Agency auspices: public or governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations
(NGOs), voluntary non-profit agencies, faith based agencies, for-profit and
proprietary agencies; Mission, mandate, sanction, fiduciary responsibility; Political
economy: organizational uncertainty, inter-organizational systems, organization
domain, domain consensus, task environment, opportunistic surveillance, boundary
spanning; formal structure and attributes: Informal organization, structure,
organization culture; Virtual organizations and technology, information technology
(IT), communication technology (CT), decentralization, tele- and WEB commuting;
Field of forces and force field analysis.
Critical Definitions
* Human Service Organizations are means-ends chains that are people-
processing and people-changing agencies in that “the core activities of the
organization are structured to process, sustain, or change people who come under
its jurisdiction (Hasenfeld, 1992, pp. 4–5).”
* Virtual organizations are a set of units; people and departments, that rely
on information and communication technologies across time and space to
communicate, coordinate, and control the organization’s production, data, skills,
knowledge, and expertise. Flexibility is possible because of reconfigurable
computer networks. Face to face communication is unnecessary and often
118
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
discouraged (Kaser, 2007; Pang, 2001; Williams, 2007).
Discussion, Teaching, and Essay Ideas Social workers and community practitioners work in, for, or under contracts
with human service agencies (HSAs). They need to understand organizations as
systems inclusive of but more than the individuals who make them up. Organizations
are abstraction composed of real units or entities. Organizations and HSAs are
systems and part of larger systems. They have formal and informal structures and
cultures. Moreover, it is not always clear what elements are included as part of the
organization even though they can appear rigid and bureaucratic. Boundaries
sometimes seem to shift and shuffle, as organizations become part of shifting
networks and loosely coupled systems. For example, a school of social work’s
fieldwork agencies are a part of the school’s system, often within its organizational
purview, and have their own networks apart from the school. With increasing
virtuality, contracting and outsourcing, and contingent employment, HSAs are
becoming more loosely coupled.
Organizations and HSAs are pervasive aspects of social work and
community practice, agency analysis is a good way to get students to understand
practice at a macro level and organizations as tools and hindrances. We have found
that inexperienced students and new social workers are frequently uninformed about
human service agencies as systems in themselves and as part of larger networks of
service delivery, creation, and change. Agency managers and supervisors often do
119
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
120
not take the time to explain even the most rudimentary features of their organization,
such as how it is funded; its mission; its size in terms of clients served, staff, or
funding; the range of its programs and services; its governance structure; and how it
fits into the larger service delivery system. Community and social work practice and
the lives of its clients are profoundly affected by organizational structure, culture,
and funding. Consequently, the questions that follow and the guidelines for agency
analysis at the end of chapter 8’s I. M. are aimed at raising awareness of human
service organizations as systemic entities and as possible target systems (or
sometimes client systems) for social worker intervention.
In our teaching of a required foundation-level course on social work practice
with communities and social service networks, all students complete an analysis of
their fieldwork placement agencies. Instructors may want to emphasize that the
agency analysis is not a term paper. It is an opportunity to learn or practice the
following skills:
Information gathering,
How to analyze an agency or organization,
How to distinguish formal authority from informal influence,
Organization and agency assessment or sorting out who is who and what is
what in the zoo, and
Assertiveness.
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
Some agencies react defensively to this analysis requirement. If the agency analysis
exercise is used, the school and course instructors may need to clarify this course
requirement with the fieldwork agency, the fieldwork liaison, and field instructor for
their cooperation. Agencies and students also need to be reassured that the
assignment is an exercise for purposes of student learning, will be treated
confidentially, and will not be kept on file by the school or used in any way as an
agency evaluation. In some cases, if a student is experiencing difficulty with
obtaining information, instructors may need to contact an agency executive or field
instructor directly to enlist cooperation and provide reassurance.
Some agencies maintain a veil of secrecy, in particular about their budget and
sources of funding. This is especially true and legal for proprietary agencies. Even
public and not-for-profit agencies in our present political economy assume an
entrepreneurial and competitive stance concerning their operations, although their
information is not proprietary. Students should be encourages to be enterprising
checking legal required corporate financial reports, public budgets, and contracts
under the Freedom of Information Act. Gaining access to this information can be an
excellent and challenging learning experience for a student. Instructors should bear
in mind, however, that the process can take more time than is reasonable for the
course or place the student in a vulnerable position.
Discussions and Exercises
1. In what ways are governmental and voluntary, nonprofit human service
121
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
agencies similar to and different from proprietary firms? Given these similarities and
differences, do you believe that proprietary businesses (privatization) overall are
better able to manage (more efficiently, more effectively) HSAs than are
governments or the voluntary, nonprofit sector? Defend you answer with logic and
evidence. Provide examples to back up your position. Whatever your position, where
do you think the notion comes from that business firms are desirable models to
emulate, especially after the Great Recession and the BP Gulf disaster?
2. What is meant by the formal structure of an organization? Provide an
example from your own experience. What is meant by the informal structure of an
organization? How do we know an informal structure exists? How can we observe
it? Provide examples from your own experience. Which, in your estimation, is more
important in trying to understand how an organization functions? Why?
3. If we look at the organization as the unit of analysis, we should be able to
identify a variety of system-level concepts that could help explain organization
behavior. What might some of these be (e.g., organizational size, complexity,
technology, structure, climate)? If you were doing a research project, how would you
define these concepts operationally?
4. In working with an individual client, we often think about concepts such
as resistance, defense mechanisms, skills, strengths, and so on. How might we apply
these concepts to an organization as a target or client system? Provide some
illustrations. For example, how about organizational information processing
122
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
capacity, accessibility or non-accessibility, communication problems of various
kinds, bureaucratic red tape?
5. In thinking about public human service agencies such as public schools,
welfare agencies, and hospitals, social workers are often overwhelmed by the volume
and complexity of client service needs coupled with the relative paucity of resources
to respond to them. What are some of the ways that this stress may be manifested in
organizational (systemic) behavior? Provide examples. How do social workers and
other staff members cope with this stress? What are some of the consequences for
clients? What might be some of the public relations consequences for those
agencies?
6. The notion of individual psychopathology has been accepted by the
profession. The idea of organizational pathology is more difficult. We can
understand the pathology of an organizational executive who, say, has a problem
with alcoholism. Can we also conceive of the alcoholic organization? In what ways
might organizational pathology be manifested? How is pathology potentially built
into the organization’s purpose, structure, and culture? Is it the organization or does
it simply have some bad apples? Research and review the Minerals Management
Service of the Department of the Interior, the Catholic Church’s pedophile and
sexual abuse scandals, and the Philadelphia Department of Human Services and its
contractor Multiethnic Behavioral Health, an NGO. One is tempted to add the United
States Senate as a pathological organization. Consider structural designs such as
123
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
particular rules, patterns of communication (the authoritarian organization, the
paternal organization), organizational culture (organizational myths, secrets, and
double messages) informal organization structure, and compliance and rewards
structures.
7. Select a human service organization you are familiar with and identify its
domain and task environment. Lay out the important elements of the task
environment (TE) in terms of the TE categories: (a) suppliers of fiscal resources; (b)
suppliers of non-fiscal resources; (c) clients or consumers and their suppliers; (d)
competitors; (e) collaborators or complementary service providers; (f) suppliers of
legitimation and authority. Explain the relationship between an organization's
domain and its TE. What does the agency exchange with the TE for the resources?
Explain the dynamics of power in organization/TE transactions. Identify a boundary-
spanning unit in the organization and explain how it helps the organization manage
its external environment.
8. Identify an organizational problem in a human service agency that you
would like to solve. (Instructor may want to identify a problem in the school of social
work, an organization that the students have in common, such as lack of student
governmental influence, course registration snafus, inflexibility, inadequate copying
facilities, or insensitivity to a particular population.) Carry out a force field analysis
of this problem (Force field guidelines are located at the end of chapter 8’s I. M.).
Review proposed change strategies and consider them in terms of (a) vulnerability to
124
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
punitive sanctions of the social worker as change agent, (b) the method and degree to
which allies are mobilized, and (c) the potential for effective outside support if
necessary.
9. Analyze your field placement agency and convert as much as possible of
the agency into a virtual agency. Can it all be converted? If converted will the agency
be more efficient and effective?
Helpful Hints for Students in Preparing an Agency Analysis Paper Even though many students are relatively new at the agency they will be
analyzing, it is critical to learn how to obtain information about the agency quickly.
The assignment should be made early in the course term and completed within a
month or so. In any job students take in the future, they will want to know most of
what is on the agency assignment within a month or two. An option is to assign it
early in the course and due toward the end of course when students are more familiar
with the concepts. The analysis then should be more sophisticated. It is not important
to answer every question on the sheet; the sheet is merely a guide. Remember the
purpose is analysis, that is, more than a description of the fieldwork organization.
Thus the students will need to get a copy of the budget and describe the highlights
and analyze any unusual or prominent features.
Think of the different topics on the outline for the paper in terms of intra- and
interorganizational structure and dynamics. Also consider the politics of the
situation. For example, can you describe and analyze the formal administrative
125
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
structure, the informal administrative structure, and the politics surrounding both the
differences between the two and the everyday management challenges? Who is on
the board and who oversees the agency? Are there any politics inherent in that
arrangement?
Real names are not needed. If field supervisors are uneasy about providing
certain information, the agency should be reassured that the papers are for the
instructor's eyes only unless he or she gets explicit permission to share the paper with
another student or colleague. Written contracts, releases of information, and
confidentiality agreements can be used if necessary.
It is the student’s job to get the information. Agencies are overloaded, field
supervisor are not expected to do the student’s legwork. Some students may overly
rely on their field instructors; however, it should be the student’s analysis, not the
field instructor’s. The learning is in the assessment and analysis.
Guidelines for Analyzing Your Agency1 Introduction The study of human service organizations is complicated, regardless of
agency size. Therefore, you cannot rely on any single source of information. As you
1 The agency analysis project is based on a guide developed by the late Professor
Emeritus William Bechill of the University of Maryland School of Social Work. It
has gone through many re-incarnations by the School’s Community Practice faculty.
126
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
examine your agency, you will be exposed to different sources whose information is
unconnected or even contradictory. Your task will be to make sense of these
differing perceptions and contradictions, including your own perceptions. In doing
your analysis, you must be cautious about accepting literally the information and
interpretations given to you by staff, clients, board members, and outside observers.
Assume an analytical stance and weigh all information received, including your own
perceptions, in light of other data that are available. As your analysis proceeds, many
of the questions raised below may not be able to be answered definitively.
Nevertheless, if they are studied and analyzed, you will acquire greater insight into
your agency's functioning.
Note to Instructors: The scope of the analysis should be adapted to your
intent. This analysis represents a major commitment of student time and energy.
Sources of information The student must triangulate measurements and data collection. This means
using more than one information source. In triangulating the student will be exposed
to often discrete and contradictory interpretations. The student’s task is to
comprehend and reconcile the contradictions and differing perceptions, including his
or her own individual perception, to form defensible conclusions, a case theory, of
the assessment. If in the agency analysis, agency many of the questions covered
cannot be definitely answered, the student is to describe the assessment effort and
127
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
explain why important explanatory information is not available. They can be
analyzed and discussed for purposes of acquiring and demonstrating insight into
organizational functioning. The assessment needs to use and reflect the assigned
literature.
Students necessarily need to be cautious in their analysis. They must evaluate
and not accept literally information and interpretations given to them by field
instructors, agency key informants, clients, and other outside informants and
information resources. The student is responsible for the conclusions and case theory.
The task is to assume an analytical stance and to weigh all information received,
including one's own perceptions, in the light of other available data and theory.
Again, always triangulate information from a number of sources. Information
sources should include:
a. Actual observations by the student of the agency, of staff and clients, of the
community, and use of other key informants’ behaviors.
b. Interviews with board members, administrators, staff, and community key
informants.
c. Interviews with clients.
d. Agency annual reports, manuals, documents, by-laws, statistical reports,
memoranda, and other pertinent information about agency policy, practice, and
program Agency budget and audit reports available from the agency, the secretary of
128
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
state, or libraries. (By law these are public for governmental and voluntary secular
nonprofit agencies.).
e. Community and social service planning reports, such as census reports,
chamber of commerce studies, and United Way studies.
f. Agency files and other types of records such as WEB pages and sites on
the agencies and community.
g. Relevant information about the community in which the agency operates
and reports about the principal outside agencies, groups, and organizations that
constitute the agency's most relevant task environment members and with which the
agency has its major exchange and competitive relationships.
h. Historical accounts and studies of the agency or similar agencies or
programs.
i. Historical accounts and studies of the agency or similar agencies and the
community.
j. Information in agency grants applications or funding proposals.
k. Literature and research on organizations and agencies usable for a
theoretical base.
Organizational governance and management Formal Structure: Prepare the organization chart of the agency showing
the division of labor and structure of authority. If the agency is subdivided into
smaller working divisions or units, also prepare a chart for your unit. This will give
129
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
you a picture of how agency structure and functions are related, as well as noting the
formal lines of authority. Remember that this sort of chart is inherently static and
presents only a partial picture of the organization and its functioning. It is merely a
starting point for a more elaborate and dynamic analysis.
1. Staffing: How many paid staff and volunteers? What education, training,
credentials are needed for the different positions? What efforts are made to recruit
staff? What efforts are made to retain staff? How adequate are salary and
benefits? What kind of staff development or training is offered? Are there rules
regarding staff behavior? Where\how do staff find out these rules? What is the
nature of the work (creative, routinized, controlled, autonomous)? Is the
organization unionized? What is the impact? If not unionized, should it be? If a
faith-based agency, does the faith’s dogma influence hiring and promotion
decisions? Are contingent and contractual employees used and, if so, to do what?
2. Clients and consumers: Are clients voluntary or mandated? What
influence does this have on their experiences with the agency? Do the clients
represent the groups that they agency wishes to serve? Are programs and services
designed to meet the needs of the clients? Are the hours of operation, location
accessibility, and other factors agreeable to client lives and schedules? Is there
outreach to current and potential client groups? In what ways are payments to or
funding of the agency lined to clients? Effectiveness? What input do clients have
in the design or evaluation of programs and services? Is funding linked to client
130
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
131
satisfaction and behavioral changes? Are clients involved in agency governance?
3. Multicultural Development: Does staff diversity match the demographic
profile of the clients and community? Do agency policies support (or not)
multicultural development? Are programs culturally appropriate given client
demographics? Is the cultural competency of staff supported by the agency? Do
agency outreach efforts support multiculturalism? To what extent has your agency
embraced multicultural development?
DIVERSITY AUDIT2
Complete based on your information in your agency (you will probably
need to consult various sources).
A. Demographics – Board, Staff and Clients
Agency Component White Black Latino Asian Pacific Islander Native American Other
Board Management Line Staff Support Staff Clients
Women Men Board Management
2 Professors Karen Hopkins and Cheryl Hyde, then both of the University of
Maryland School of Social Work were especially instrumental in developing the
diversity sections.
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
Line Staff Support Staff Clients
How did you determine ethnicity?
Informal Structure and Organizational Culture:
All organizations have a culture. It is a set of beliefs, values and norms
that provide blueprints for behavior in the organization. For example, one agency
might value exploration, innovation, and excitement in serving the community
while another value order, efficiency, and self-control. The behavior of staff in the
two agencies is likely to be quite different. Although the formal structure provides
a framework for decision-making, many other human factors influence agency
decisions and their implementation. Among these are organizational culture and
informal relationships and channels of communication; agency participants who are
powerful by virtue of expertise, connections, charisma, control over needed
resources, sanctions, and rewards; organizational values and norms; organizational
climate and morale; and agency tradition and history. Identify some of the influential
members of your agency with power not derived from a formal position of authority
and illustrate how this influence was exercised in at least one instance of
organization decision making. Culture is expressed in formal, written, policies and
rules and in informal, unwritten codes of conduct and behavior. This section
requires participant-observation skills. Look at your organizational chart(s) and
132
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
consider whether the people in equivalent positions seem as equal in reality as they
are on paper. Rank them in terms of their perceived power, access to the CEO, and
approachability. Note where formal lines of authority do not seem to be followed.
Does this help you detect who can influence and who can be influenced? Consider
other staff members in the same way--secretaries and administrative assistants, for
example. One way to observe who is listened to and to note staff-leader interactions,
is to watch who goes into and out of whose offices. A social work student who did
such a chart in one agency discovered that the staff person with whom everyone
interacted most often had the most inaccessible office. That staff person was moved
to a larger, more central office.
1. Describe the organizational culture or climate in your agency. Do staff and
clients feel comfortable? Why or why not? Describe staff’s morale. What are
the organization’s norms and values? Is there a difference between stated
formal and actual values expressed in behavior? Are there different "sub-
cultures" in the organization? How do you explain their existence?
2. How are clients treated? How long do they have wait at the facility for
service? How are they addressed? What are the physical conditions of client
service areas? Do you see a relationship between the way clients are treated
and the way staff is treated?
3. Please describe the informal system and the informal organization’s
variances from the formal organization and your assessment as to why the
133
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
variance exists. Identify some of the influential members of your organization
with power and influence not derived from a formal position of authority and
the sources of the power and influence. Illustrate how this influence was
exercised in at least one instance of organization decision-making.
4. What is it like to work in this agency? Is the atmosphere friendly,
professional, supportive, stimulating, rigid? Describe the quality of
supervision. What is the status and authority of social work in the
organization and the basis for your assessment?
For this exercise, find a central location in the agency or subunit such as the
water fountain and draw a sketch of each office; then track the movements of the
staff and make lines showing the connections. It may be weeks before patterns show
up, especially since students are in the field part time. You will be experimenting
with a type of socio-gram. This method relies less on gossip and hearsay than do
some other methods of perceiving the informal system. It tells us more about office
communication, central figures in the work of the office, and networks of influence,
than about power.
Since we are concerned with various dynamics, we must not overlook the
affective center of a workplace or key troubleshooter by concentrating only on who
controls things. As another way of looking at the informal system in the field agency,
the student should figure out who plays these roles in their agency or subunit (if
anyone). This is the person who
134
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
• collects for flowers and baby gifts,
• gets things done, unclogs, or goes around the system,
• knows the institutional history of the agency,
• knows the janitors and all the nonprofessionals,
• knows the boss best outside of work,
• has the best outside connections, and
• best epitomizes the organizational culture.
Virtuality: To what extent does the agency use Information and
Communication Technology? Is it used and how beyond data processing and
storage? How is it used with and by clients? Is tele- and internet commuting
encouraged? What are the agency’s computer, internet, and email policies? Does it
provide IT and CT to staff?
Board of Directors/Advisory Boards: Interview a board officer, regular
board member, management, and staff about what the board does and how it works.
Review a copy of the agency's by-laws and constitution. For a public agency,
identify and review the legislation creating your organization. From this information,
answer the following questions
Auspices and Governing or Advisory Boards of Directors
1. What is the agency’s auspice? Is the agency a public, a secular nonprofit,
faith based, or proprietary profit? (b) If public, what is the governmental
unit?
135
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
2. Briefly describe the agency's governing board of directors or relevant advisory
board (whichever applies). Include characteristics such as: (a) size, (b)
composition by gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic class (see above), (c)
assessment as to how well it represents the community and what parts of the
community are represented (community interests and organizations that current
board members formally and informally represent), (d) key committees, (e)
formal and informal process used for making decisions, and (f) major activities
or projects of the board for the year.
3. Is the board’s fiduciary responsibility clear? How is the board trained in its
fiduciary responsibility?
4. What is the board's role in hiring and firing staff and in making agency policy?
The executive director's role? Find an example of policymaking.
If any of the above information is not available, please recount your efforts to
obtain the information. Except for proprietary agencies, this information is public
information.
Organizational fiscal resources
Every human service agency operates in an increasingly competitive
economic and political climate. There are seldom enough financial resources to
do everything an agency wants to do. How an agency allocates its funds represent
the agency's true priorities. (Just, as is the case with your own personal budget.)
To truly understand an agency, you need to understand the budget.
136
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
In most organizations, information about finances is sensitive. (Why is it?)
Consequently, some agencies treat budgetary information as confidential, even
though all governmental and nonprofit organizations must file financial report
forms of various kinds with the state and IRS. Secondly, they exist to serve the
public and this information should be public. You may have difficulty obtaining
specific line-budget information and this will be an area that will test your
assessment skills/ General budgetary information will normally be available for
your agency. If you have difficulty getting budgetary information, please consult
with your instructor. Again, this information is public even for proprietaries when
under public contract. Voluntary not-for-profit agencies are required to file a
Form 990 with the IRS. It is available to the public under the Freedom of
Information Act. Ask for it. Budget information on the agency also can be
obtained from www.guidestar.org , a watchdog group.
1. What is the size of your agency's budget? Provide figures for major areas
of expenditure (e.g., staff, upkeep). What are the major sources of
financial support for this agency? How do sources of support and
expenditures seem to affect the delivery of services or programs? What
budget information is available to staff?
2. If applicable, how large is the budget for your department or program?
What percentage of funds is allocated to professional staff positions?
What percentage to administrative and support functions?
137
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
138
3. Does the agency have a program budget? Which program receives the
greatest amount of financial support?
4. What is the starting salary for a professional MSW level social
worker? A BSW social worker? What salary could a supervisor or
administrator expect to earn after 5-6 years in the agency? What is the
salary range for the agency director? What kind of a benefit package
would a starting MSW receive?
5. Is the agency on firm financial ground? What is the basis for your
judgment?
6. Please fully describe the efforts you made to obtain the budget
information including the obstacles you encountered and what you did
to try to overcome them.
Organizational domain and task environment
Organizational Domain: An organization's domain represents the claims it
stakes out for itself in terms of (1) the range of human problems and concerns it
proposes to address, (2) the services offered and technologies used (e.g., family
therapy, emergency food, community organizing), and (3) the population entitled to
use the services it offers.
Identify the specific human problems and concerns that the agency is
organized to address. Classify these by the service unit to which the problem or
concern is related (e.g., individual, group, family, community).
Instructor's Manual to Accompany Community Practice
Identify and list the services that the agency offers vis-à-vis the problems and issues
that it attempts to handle.
Identify the units (individuals, families, groups, other organizations, etc.) that are
eligible for the services offered by the agency. Enumerate the conditions and qualifications
that have to be met in order to be officially eligible for the services.
Task Environment: An organization's task environment is the network of
institutions, organizations, and individuals that an agency must deal with in order to
accomplish its mission. It consists of the following categories of organizations and subunits:
(1) source of clients or customers, (2) sources of fiscal support, (3) sources of non-fiscal
resources, (4) collaborators, (5) competitors, and (6) sources of legitimation and authority.
Since an organization seldom has complete control over the elements in its task environment,
these elements pose various degrees of uncertainty that the agency must manage successfully
in order to accomplish its goals.
Map out the main elements of your agency's task environment. Which elements pose
the greatest degree of uncertainty for your agency and how does the agency attempt to deal
with this? How well is the agency managing?
Organizational goals
Cite the official statements, if any, that describe the mission and goals of the agency.
Have there been any recent changes in the content of these policy statements? In your view,
are the agency's mission and goals clear to the various members of the organization (e.g.,
staff, clients, board)? If not, why not?
As a result of interviews with members of the executive core of the agency, how
139
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
would you describe their perspectives on the organization's goals?
1. How well do the administrators' perceptions of mission and goals conform to the
official statements? How are they different?
2. What aspects of the agency's programs do they see as best reflecting the agency's
objectives? What aspects are least reflective of these objectives?
3. What priorities do they seem to establish among the several formally stated goals?
4. What roles do they see the agency performing in the larger community?
5. What do they identify as the major problems or tasks in the agency's programs or
services that require prompt solutions? What major problems and tasks, in their opinion,
require more long-range planning and action?
6. What do they see as the major strengths of the agency in relation to achieving its
goals?
7. What perceptions do they have of the agency's clients, their relevant
characteristics, and their major needs? What do they see as the major goals of the agency
with respect to its clients?
From interviews with direct line staff, determine the following questions:
1. What do they perceive as the major objectives in serving the clients of the
agency?
2. Does any objective seem to have a greater priority than the others do?
3. What perceptions do they hold about the relevant characteristics of the agency's
and clients’ needs?
4. What are their perceptions about proper staff-client relationships?
140
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
5. What role do they see they agency playing in the larger community?
6. What do they see as the major strengths and weaknesses of the agency?
From interviews with clients, answer the following questions:
1. What do they see as the major objectives of the agency?
2. What expectations do they have for the staff?
3. What would they like the agency to do that it does not do currently?
4. What do they see as the major strengths and weaknesses of the agency?
From interviews with a board officer and a board member (along with questions
about board functioning mentioned earlier), answer the following questions:
1. What do they see as the major goals of the agency?
2. What do they see as the major strengths and weaknesses of the agency?
3. What role do they see the agency performing in the larger community?
4. Summarize, compare and contrast the similarities and differences in the
perspectives of the board, executive core staff, line and clients about the agency’s
goals, priorities, strengths and weaknesses, and role in the community.
Source / Question Board Core Executives Line Staff Clients
5. From your observations of staff-client relations, what are your conclusions as to the
141
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
actual tasks that staff perform? Explicitly compare to I.A. above.
6. From your review of the agency's budget, what are the agency's priorities? How well does
the budget support the agency's stated priorities? Compare the existing priority given to
various services and tasks based on allocation of resources to the priorities supported by the
executive core and other staff.
7. What are your perceptions about how well the agency carries out its mission (agency
effectiveness)? What are the agency's strengths and weaknesses?
Guidelines for Field of Forces Analysis3 Field of Forces or Force Field Analysis is a mapping tool that divides and
assesses whether the units in the task environment promote or curtail the desired change,
and how the forces can be manipulated for change. The analysis organizes the agency or
community - the unit to change - into a field of forces that influences the focal agency, or
any other entity in the field, and can be influenced by the entity. The field is similar to the
concept of task environment. The field is not static. Any entity in the field is engaged in a
stream of activity and is subjected to the vicissitudes of the surrounding ecology or task
environment.
Concepts of Field Analysis: 1. Objects are the things, the entities, in the task environment or field that can move
toward or away from the direction of a desired change.
2. Field is the life space or space of an object with any and all other objects that influence
3 See: Lewin, (1976), pp. 1-36.
142
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
it.
3. Force is the direction of movement of a particular actor, entity or object in the field.
The movement can be toward, a driving force, or away, a restraining force, from the
desired direction of change. Objects with their forces can be excessive with more than is
necessary for change of a particular force, unpredictable if an object changes its direction
without control, consistent if stable in direction, working or driving when moving in the
direction of desired change, and amenable if an object and a driving force that can be
influenced or controlled (Lauffer, 1982). The greater the number and potency of forces
that are driving and working, amenable, and consistent and when restraining forces are
amenable, the more likely change will occur in a desired direction.
4. Valence is the property of an object in the field - either positive or negative - in its
movement in the direction of the desired change or away from desired change. It is
positive when moving toward preferred change and a negative valence if moving away
from desired change.
5. Potency is the force’s strength for change.
6. Activity is the behavior of the objects in the field. 7. Tension reduction is the activity of an object in response to forces upon it. Objects
seek to reduce tension brought about by the force field. The object or target of change
responds to valence and potency of the objects’ forces. These forces are driving if they
move the focal object in the direct of the desired change or restraining if they move the
desired object away from the desired change.
143
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
8. Blocks and barriers are static elements in a field that tends to prevent or cement
change.
Analysis is mapping the field to determine: 1. the field’s existing objects, 2.
objects’ force characteristics and activity (current state of the field), 3. desired level or
change of the field (change objectives). 4. identify actors, objects, and forces in field and
whether driving or restraining (valence) and characteristics of redundancy, predictability,
amenableness, and potency. Special attention is given to working forces and those
amenable to change in construction of an action system to change potency of driving and
restraining forces.
Diagram New Field Level Sought ---------------------------------------------- RESTRAINING FORCES = Existing level of field [blocks and barriers] [blocks and barriers] DRIVING FORCES =
3. Construct Action System. Procedures: 1. Assess number of valence and strength of driving and restraining forces. 2. Assess how to increase the strength of driving and weaken strength of the restraining
forces.
3. Assess and remove restraining blocks and put in place blocks under the driving forces.
144
Community Practice, Third Edition, Instructor’s Manual
145
Blocks and barriers are static and neutral - as amount of money in a community. The
control and use of the money can be a driving or a restraining force.
References Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). The nature of human service organizations. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Kaser, D.(2007). Virtuality, Information today, 24(3), 14.
Lauffer, A. (1982). Assessment tools for practitioners, managers, and trainees. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
Lewin, K. (1976). Field theory as human science. New York: Gardner Press.
Pang, L. (2001). Understanding virtual organizations, Information Systems Control
Journal, 6. Retrieved February 15, 2010, from: http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm
Williams, R. (2007). Moving beyond vagueness: Social capital, social networks, and
economic outcomes. In J. Jennings, (Ed.). Race, neighborhoods, and misuse of social
capital. (pp. 67-86), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.