CERTIFICATE I Malcolm Roy Bendall certify that the following ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
Transcript of CERTIFICATE I Malcolm Roy Bendall certify that the following ...
No. ADG 85 of 2013
IN THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADELAIDE REGISTRY
IN THE MATTER OF: MALCOLM ROY BENDALL RIG ASSIST PTY LTD (ACN 075 814 390) Applicant Creditor MALCOLM ROY BENDALL Respondent Debtor CERTIFICATE I Malcolm Roy Bendall certify that the following 10 pages constitutes the exhibit marked MRB6 of my Affidavit sworn in London of the 7th day of July 2013. Signed:
Thylacine Drilling Consulting
199a Tranmere Road
TRANMERE TAS 7018
17 June 2009
Paul Heath
Chief Operating Officer
Great South Land Minerals Ltd
Dear Paul
RE: MODUSPEC INSPECTION
I think we need to make it clear that Moduspec are not a regulatory board, and that inspections are often done to appease the client before they accept the rig. How far we go with their recommendations are up to us as the client. However the inspections are also done to make sure the rig complies with local HSE requirement and legislation and contractual requirements.
To be perfectly honest, the Drilling contractor has a certain amount of ill feeling towards Moduspec. This is because an inspector comes out to the rigsite and basically can give the rig a bad bill of health. This would mean the rig could lose its contract and find itself out of work. We know that a certain amount of work has been done already and according to Hunt, they have completed the recommendations that Moduspec reported.
I arrived at the Bellevue #1 rig site on Monday 15 June to conduct a brief inspection of the possible outstanding critical items that were reported on the most recent Moduspec report. The rig, as you know, has already started to de-‐mob and on Thursday 18 June, they will continue the operation to rig down and move to another location. I was unable to inspect several of the recommendations made by Moduspec due to the present position of the rig being in a state off rig down, so I was not able to inspect the status of some of the items
that Hunt had said they had changed. However, what I was able to see, complied with the recommendations and would be accepted.
The normal practise before we spud in, is for the client ( GSLM ) and Hunt to get together with a “Pre Spud list “. This usually entails a performance test with the Drawworks running and the rotary table running for an hour at low speed and hi speed. The Mud pumps would also be run through a closing choke to get pressure up on the power paks to see if the rig can handle the load. The pumps would then be run at maximum rate over the hole for an hour. You would then go through the safety requirements of what is required to run the operation safely and what is needed to comply with local area legislation. However, if I was to go through the Moduspec report, one would find that many of the recommendations had not been done, because the rig was not yet ready to drill, and many of the said recommendations would have been completed prior to spudding in the well as per the requirement of the “Pre Spud list”. So, I think that Hunt were right to have a certain bitch with the report. If I was to take item 11.4.1.5 and 11.4.1.6, these items which are classed as “critical”, these would normally be done before pre spud and would be completed by the Derrickman as part of his safety check list. There are many of these items that would have been normally closed out as a matter of practise. We would also check all documentation that requires the operation to go ahead and, when the paperwork is in order, the Drilling rig is ready to turn to the right.
I was able to check 75% of the required recommendations and what I have done is compiled a few of those and confirm the changes had been implemented and that some items need to be looked at again.
5.13.1.4
The Toku 400kg does say on it that it is a dedicated Man Rider, Hunt says on their recommendation that it is “not” a dedicated Man Rider. We need to confirm this as a critical item.
5.17.6.1.2
On inspection there was found to be chains broken on these fingers, Moduspec have said that the chains need to be installed half way along the length, so as to avoid one breaking and falling to the drill floor. This can be argued as a little bit over the top as many rigs just have the small piece of chain welded to the finger to keep it from falling if it snapped off. It is unlikely that the finger would snap in half as it is in one piece. However, Hunt have offered to modify this prior to the next mast inspection.
6.10.1.3
This item was deemed as critical and I have visually inspected to modification and it seems to be in order, however I did not get to see the Hi Pressure welding inspection certificate.
5.17.1.1.3
This item has been itemised as being critical, however the rig has operated for over 20 years with this equipment and, although it is antiquated, it has worked well in the past and I believe that it meets the regulatory requirements. However, Hunt are looking to go forward with the implementation of automated tubular handling equipment and this would reduce tripping times and would be a cost advantage to GSLM.
5.17.4.1.1
This item was deemed critical, however the Elevator links have been checked and found to be well within acceptable limits. The paperwork and certification once viewed will verify the findings.
In Conclusion
The Rig and its components seem to be up to a certain standard -‐ you get what you pay for and we know it has drilled many holes and is old. It has its limitations, therefore we should expect certain problems with the Rig. In my experience with Moduspec, I have found that if I was working,say on a Semi-‐Submersible, and that Moduspec were called into do an inspection and audit, they would most likely send 2 to 3 inspectors. One would have Mechanical/Electrical experience, the other two would most likely have Drilling / Safety and Marine experience. So, what we may have had on Hunt #3, was an inspector who may have had experience in any one of these fields, but was not classed as totally experienced in small on-‐shore operations. Some of the recommendations looked at being a little over zealous, therefore putting the operation of the rig in doubt. On my part, and seeing what I have over the past week, the rig has complied with most of the recommendations. What is required is the rig to be rigged up and Hunt saying to us that they are ready to go. They must also show us that the recommendations that have not been completed, will be and, if not, why.
I still have serious doubts about the power that is available, and would like to see and hear Hunts views on this. They have said that the rig is capable of lifting the drill string at a depth of 2800 meters, however ,if we get into serious down hole problems and we require opull to get out of the hole we may find us lacking. This could have serious ramifications. If Hunt is in agreement with this, we may have to change the design of the drill string and run a tapered one instead.
Regards
David Dunsby
Thylacine Drilling & Consulting