Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Party Leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian Elections
-
Upload
kristiania -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Party Leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian Elections
Birds Of A Feather Flock Together?Party Leaders On Twitter During The 2013 Norwegian Elections"Presentation for the Strategic Communication Campaigns in a Contemporary, Digital and Networked Society preconference, ICA 2014!
Anders Olof Larsson [email protected]!@a_larsson!Øyvind Ihlen [email protected]!
Broadcasting or Communicating?
• ”Infomercials” (Stromer-Galley, 2000), ”electronic brochures” (Druckman et. al., 2007)
• Influx of social media has again raised the hopes for more communicative practices
• Engagement with voters on the Internet leads to positive evaluations of politicians (Grant et. al., 2010; Utz, 2009)
• Political Public Relations – foster good relationships with key constituents (Strömbäck and Kiousis, 2011)
• Politicians have mainly employed Twitter for broadcasting purposes – self-promotion (Golbeck, Grimes and Rogers, 2010) – impression management (Jackson and Lilleker, 2011) – information dissemination (Small, 2011, Sæbø, 2011) – party mobilization (Dang-Xuan, Stieglitz, Wladarsch and Neuberger, 2013)
- Norway - Party-centered
democracy - 4.9 million inhabitants
- 2011 Regional Elections - Study by Enli and
Skogerbø - 44 % @replies by the
sampled politicians
How do Norwegian party leaders utilize Twitter in their election campaigns?
Which publics do the politicians prioritize to
engage with?"
Method • Data Collection
– Focus on Twitter accounts of the seven main party leaders; N of @replies sent
– Archive traffic to and from these accounts during ’the short campaign’ using YourTwapperKeeper
– Process resulted in a sample of 846 @replies sent from the party leaders to a total of 518 users
• Data analysis
– Excel, SPSS, Gephi – Coding of identified users
• Citizen; Media Professional; Organizational Representative; Politician
– Inter-coder reliability testing: 10 % sample, resulting in Krippendorff’s α = .69
Concluding Remarks
• One-way online rationales replaced by two-way? – As in 2011, plenty of @replies sent in comparison to other elections
• However, this communicative behaviour is limited in scope – Nodes in network chart rather small = few messages received
• Enough to decrease the ”psychological distance” (Vergeer et. al., 2011) between voter and politician?
• In total, a somewhat surprising amount of @replies sent to citizens:
– Citizens: 46 % of all @replies – Media Professionals: 18 % – Organizational Representatives: 18 % – Politicians: 18 %
• Sweden 2014 – similar tendencies?
Thank you for your attention."
Anders Olof Larsson [email protected]!Øyvind Ihlen [email protected]!