Role of neuregulin-1β in dexamethasone-enhanced surfactant synthesis in fetal type II cells
BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus following contextual learning is blocked by intrahippocampal...
Transcript of BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus following contextual learning is blocked by intrahippocampal...
www.elsevier.com/locate/jneuroim
Journal of Neuroimmunolog
BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus following contextual
learning is blocked by intrahippocampal IL-1h administration
Ruth M. Barrientos*, David B. Sprunger, Serge Campeau,
Linda R. Watkins, Jerry W. Rudy, Steven F. Maier
Department of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 345, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Received 29 May 2004; received in revised form 18 June 2004; accepted 18 June 2004
Abstract
The present study examined the modulating effects of an intrahippocampal injection of interleukin-1h (IL-1h) on brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA expression 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 h following contextual fear conditioning, a task known to increase BDNF
mRNA, in rats. Contextual fear conditioning produced a time-dependent increase in BDNF mRNA that varied by region of hippocampus. IL-
1h blocked or reduced these increases in BDNF mRNA in the CA1, CA2, and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus, but had no effect in
cortical regions. These data support the idea that IL-1h-produced memory deficits may be mediated via BDNF mRNA reductions in
hippocampus.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Memory consolidation; Time course; Proinflammatory cytokines; BDNF; Intrahippocampal; In situ hybridization
1. Introduction
Peripheral infection can produce severe and prolonged
declines in cognitive functioning in individuals with
neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease
and Parkinson’s disease (Perry et al., 2003). Moreover,
infection and the consequent activation of immune cells
can even lead to interference with cognitive processes in
healthy humans (Reichenberg et al., 2001) and animals
(Gibertini et al., 1995), although the effects in these
subjects are of smaller magnitude and duration. Clearly,
interference with cognitive functions by peripheral infec-
tion or immune stimulation can only occur via the
activation of pathways from the periphery to the brain,
which can lead to alterations of function within the brain.
Indeed, research conducted over the past decade has
uncovered both blood-borne and neural routes by which
proinflammatory cytokines, released from activated
0165-5728/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.06.009
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 303 492 0777; fax: +1 303 492 2967.
E-mail address: [email protected] (R.M. Barrientos).
immune cells within peripheral organs in which immune
responses occur, can signal the brain and potently alter
neural activity (Maier et al., 2001). Thus, the activity of
the brain changes quite markedly within a short period of
time following the release of proinflammatory cytokines in
the periphery. For example, c-fos mRNA increases in
regions such as the area postrema, nucleus tractus
solitarius, and hypothalamic nuclei within 1 h (the first
timepoint examined) of injection of lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) or interleukin-1h (IL-1h) itself, with activation
spreading to other areas more relevant to cognition at
later timepoints (Brady et al., 1994; Ericsson et al., 1994).
At the neurochemical level, changes in the hippocampus
are prominent, with extracellular serotonin increasing quite
markedly within 90 min (Linthorst et al., 1995).
Interestingly, the de novo induction of proinflammatory
cytokines such as IL-1h within the brain is a key feature of
the neural cascade that is induced by peripheral infection/
immune activation (Laye et al., 1994; Nguyen et al., 1998).
This is noted because elevated levels of IL-1h within the
hippocampus are now known to impair hippocampal-
dependent memory consolidation (Barrientos et al., 2002,
y 155 (2004) 119–126
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126120
2003; Gibertini et al., 1995; Oitzl et al., 1993; Pugh et al.,
2001; Yirmiya et al., 2002).
Memory consolidation is thought to be dependent on
long-term potentiation (LTP), a form of synaptic plasticity
that is characterized by a persistent increase in synaptic
efficacy following tetanic stimulation (Bliss and Lomo,
1973). Importantly, inhibition of LTP results in hippo-
campal-dependent memory impairments (Morris et al.,
1986; Shimizu et al., 2000), and elevated hippocampal IL-
1h has been shown to interfere with LTP (Lynch, 1998).
Although the impact of increased hippocampal IL-1hon memory consolidation is clear, the mechanism(s) by
which IL-1h interferes with memory consolidation is
unknown. IL-1h could interfere with hippocampal func-
tion directly, or it could modulate other factors that are
important in memory consolidation. Brain-derived neuro-
trophic factor (BDNF) is an intriguing candidate in this
regard. BDNF is a neurotrophin whose expression is
required for basal neurogenesis, is important in neuro-
protective responses to insults (Lee et al., 2002), and is
critical for early-, middle-, and late-phase events involved
in synaptic plasticity (Korte et al., 1995; Messaoudi et al.,
2002; Tyler et al., 2002) and hippocampal-dependent
memory consolidation (Hall et al., 2000; Ma et al.,
1998; Mizuno et al., 2000). BDNF is rapidly induced in
the hippocampus during learning and memory tasks that
require intact hippocampal function, such as contextual
fear conditioning (Hall et al., 2000), and is necessary for
at least 4 h after training to form a long-term memory
(Alonso et al., 2002). It is noteworthy that BDNF is
required at the time of LTP induction as well (Alonso et
al., 2002; Gartner and Staiger, 2002). Thus, reductions in
hippocampal BDNF lead to both inhibition of LTP and
hippocampal-dependent memory impairments (Alonso et
al., 2002; Ma et al., 1998).
Given these data, it is interesting to note that systemic
administration of either IL-1h or LPS has been reported to
significantly downregulate BDNF mRNA in the hippo-
campus (Lapchak et al., 1993). Since peripheral IL-1h or
LPS administration increases both IL-1h mRNA (Laye et
al., 1994) and proteins (Nguyen et al., 1998) in the
hippocampus, it is possible that elevated IL-1h in the brain
decreases BDNF expression, thereby, in whole or in part,
accounting for the interference with memory consolidation.
Consistent with this possibility, we have shown that social
isolation, which elevates endogenous IL-1h protein in the
hippocampus (Pugh et al., 1999), reduces BDNF mRNA in
the hippocampus and impairs hippocampal-dependent
memory (Barrientos et al., 2003). Furthermore, an intra-
hippocampal injection of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-
1ra) before social isolation prevented both the BDNF
reduction and the memory impairment produced by social
isolation (Barrientos et al., 2003). Although these data are
consistent with the idea that IL-1h-produced memory
impairments are mediated via a downregulation of BDNF
mRNA, there is no direct evidence that elevations of IL-1h
in the hippocampus would, in fact, result in a reduction of
the hippocampal BDNF mRNA increase that is produced by
a learning experience.
The present study thus examined the modulating effects
of an intrahippocampal injection of IL-1h administered
immediately after contextual fear conditioning, a task
known to increase BDNF mRNA in the hippocampus
(Hall et al., 2000). BDNF mRNA expression in the
hippocampus was examined 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 h after
conditioning. To demonstrate the specificity of IL-1h’saction in the hippocampus, we measured BDNF expres-
sion in the cortex. While it seems intuitive to measure
BDNF expression in the amygdala instead, we did not
because Hall et al. (2000) reported that there was no
increase in BDNF mRNA expression in the amygdala
associated with contextual conditioning. Thus, no modu-
lating effects of IL-1h on BDNF mRNA expression would
be expected in this region. Measuring BDNF expression
in the cortex instead further validates the specific effect of
IL-1h in the hippocampus.
Since there are no previous experiments examining the
effects of an intrahippocampal injection of IL-1h after
training on the consolidation of contextual fear memory,
such an experiment was also conducted.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Subjects
Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (Harlan, Indianapolis,
IN) weighing approximately 300 g at the beginning of the
experiment were housed four to a cage [52 (L)�30
(W)�21 (H) cm] at 25 8C on a 12-h:12-h light/dark cycle
(lights on at 0700 h). Cages were lined with standard
bedding and rats were allowed free access to food and
water and were given 1 week to acclimate to colony
conditions before experimentation began. All experiments
were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by
the University of Colorado Animal Care and Use
Committee. All efforts were made to minimize the number
of animals used and their suffering.
2.2. Surgery
Under halothane anesthesia, all animals were placed in
a Kopf sterotaxic apparatus and implanted with bilateral
cannulae (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) directed at the
dorsal hippocampus (for a detailed procedure, see Bar-
rientos et al., 2002). Briefly, cannulae were placed in the
following coordinates relative to bregma: AP, �3.5 mm;
ML, F2.4 mm; and DV, �3.0 mm. Each guide cannula
was fitted with a dummy cannula that extended 1 mm
beyond the tip of the guide cannula (i.e., total length, 4
mm) to maintain patency. Rats were allowed to recover
for 4 weeks.
Fig. 1. Representative Cresyl violet-stained brain section with cannulae
track marks depicting correct placement. Microinjections were made
through guide cannulae placed AP �3.5 mm, ML F2.4 mm, DV �4.0
mm from bregma.
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126 121
2.3. Apparatus
Conditioning chambers were two identical Igloo coolers,
as previously described (Barrientos et al., 2002). A 2-s, 1.4-
mA shock was delivered through a removable floor of
stainless steel rods 1.5 mm in diameter, spaced 1.2 cm
center to center. Each rod was wired to a shock generator
and scrambler (Colbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA).
Chambers were cleaned with water before each animal
was conditioned or tested.
2.4. Behavioral procedures
Rats were taken two at a time from their home cage and
each was placed in a conditioning chamber. Rats were
allowed to explore the chamber for 2 min before the onset of
a 2-s footshock (1.4 mA). Another 2 min later, the rats
received a second 2-s footshock and then were removed
from the chamber. Rats then received a bilateral micro-
injection of either vehicle or IL-1h (IL-1h; see below) into
the dorsal hippocampus. For the behavioral experiment, the
rats were then tested for fear of the conditioning context 48
h later as a measure of memory, as previously described
(Barrientos et al., 2002). Briefly, rats were placed in the
context and observed for 6 min, and scored as either moving
or freezing every 10 s. Scoring was carried out by observers
blind to experimental treatment and interrater reliability
exceeded 97%.
For the in situ hybridization experiment, rats were
decapitated 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h following microinjection. A
group that was neither conditioned nor injected was also
included to serve as basal controls. The time at which they
were decapitated was counterbalanced to account for time of
day effects. Brains were rapidly removed, frozen in cold
isopentane, and stored at �80 8C.
2.5. Microinjections
Microinjections were carried out immediately following
contextual fear conditioning as previously described (Bar-
rientos et al., 2002). Briefly, a 33-gauge microinjector
(Plastics One) attached to PE50 tubing was inserted through
the indwelling guide cannula. The distal end of the PE50
tubing was attached to a 100-Al Hamilton syringe, which
was placed into a Kopf microinjection unit (Model 5000)
that accurately dispensed the desired volume. Human
recombinant IL-1h, generously provided by the NIH Bio-
logical Response Modifier Program, was microinjected at a
dose of 10 ng in a volume of 0.5 Al per side of the
hippocampus. Vehicle controls received equivolume phos-
phate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4).
2.6. In situ hybridization and histology
Sections (10 Am) were cut on a Leica cryostat through
the hippocampus, thaw-mounted onto polylysine-coated
slides, and stored at �80 8C until processing. Sections
were fixed in buffered paraformaldehyde (4%) for 1 h,
rinsed three times with 2� SSC (standard sodium citrate),
placed in 0.1 M triethanolamine containing 0.25% acetic
anhydride for 10 min, rinsed for 5 min in H2O, and
dehydrated in alcohols. The cDNA probe specific for
BDNF (795 bp fragment; courtesy of Dr. J. Herman,
University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH)
was directed at exon V, which codes for the mature
protein. It was linearized using the NHE restriction
enzyme. To generate 35S-labeled complementary RNA to
BDNF mRNA, 1 Ag of linearized plasmid DNA; 1� T3
transcription buffer (Promega); 125 AC of 35S-UTP; 4 Alof H2O; 12.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); 150 AM GTP,
CTP, and ATP; 20 U of RNase inhibitor; and 6 U T3
polymerase in a total volume of 25 Al were incubated for
~2 h at 37 8C. To isolate the complete complementary
RNA from single nucleotides, a Sephadex G50-50 column
was used. The 35S-labeled probe was diluted in hybrid-
ization buffer to yield an approximate concentration of
1�106 cpm/65 Al. The hybridization buffer consisted of
50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 2� SSC, 50 mM
sodium phosphate buffer (pH=7.4), 1� Denhardt’s sol-
ution, and 0.1 mg/ml yeast tRNA. The radiolabeled probe/
hybridization mixture (65 Al) was applied to each slide,
and sections were coverslipped. Slides were placed in
covered plastic boxes lined with filter paper moistened
with 50% formamide/50% H2O and incubated for 12–16 h
at 55 8C. Coverslips were floated off in 2� SSC, and
slides were rinsed three times in 2� SSC. Slides were
incubated in RNase A (200 Ag/ml) for 60 min at 37 8C,followed by successive washes in 2�, 1�, 0.5�, and
0.1� SSC for 2–3 min each, with an additional incubation
in 0.1� SSC for 60 min at 70 8C. Slides were rinsed in
distilled H2O, dehydrated in alcohols, and exposed to
Kodak BIOMAX MR X-ray film for approximately 5
days.
Semiquantitative analyses were performed on digitized
images from X-ray films in the linear range of the
acquisition system. This system consisted of a Northern
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126122
Light box, model B-95 (Imaging Research, St-Catharines,
Ontario, Canada), a Sony XC-ST70 digital camera fitted
with a Navitar 7000 zoom lens, a Scion LG3 frame
Fig. 2. Mean integrated densities of BDNF mRNA expression in dorsal and ventr
following contextual fear conditioning. Intrahippocampal IL-1h significantly bloc
dorsal and ventral DG. Uninjected/unconditioned rats served as baseline controls
grabber board, and a Scion Image (ver. Beta 4.0.2; Scion,
Frederick, MD) on a Dell 8100 computer. Signal pixels of
a region of interest were defined as having a gray value of
al CA1, CA2, CA3, and DG regions of the hippocampus 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 h
ked BDNF mRNA expression in dorsal and ventral CA1, ventral CA2, and
. Bars=S.E.M.
Fig. 3. Representative in situ hybridization images depicting BDNF mRNA expression in dorsal hippocampus and anterior cortex of vehicle or IL-1h-treatedrats at 2 h following contextual fear conditioning. Largest differences can be seen in CA1 and DG regions. There were no group differences in BDNF mRNA
expression in the cortex. Uninjected/unconditioned rats served as baseline controls. Measurements were taken for ventral regions also, but are not depicted here.
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126 123
3.5 S.D. above the mean gray value of a cell-poor area
close to the region of interest. The number of pixels and
the average gray values above the set background were
then computed for each region of interest and multiplied,
giving an integrated densitometric measurement. An
average of 8–12 measurements were made for each region
of interest [dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus (DG); CA1,
CA2, and CA3 regions of the hippocampus; and anterior
and posterior cortices above the hippocampus], and these
values were further averaged to obtain a single integrated
density value per region for each rat. The specificity of
the probe was confirmed in a control experiment by using
a sense probe. No specific hybridization was observed in
the sense-treated sections (data not shown).
Slides that underwent in situ hybridization were later
stained with Cresyl violet to determine proper cannulae
placement into the hippocampus. To verify cannulae
placement in rats that participated in the behavioral
experiment, rats were anesthesized with Nembutal and
decapitated, then brains were removed, sliced, and stained
with Cresyl violet. Slides were then examined under a
light microscope to verify that the cannulae were placed in
the hippocampus. Only rats with proper cannulae place-
ment (as seen in Fig. 1) were included in the statistical
analyses of each experiment.
Fig. 4. Mean integrated densities of BDNF mRNA expression in anterior and poste
There was very little BDNF mRNA expression in these cortical regions compared
IL-1h-treated rats. Bars=S.E.M.
3. Results
3.1. Experiment 1
BDNF mRNA levels are shown in Fig. 2. In general,
there was a large rise in BDNF mRNA in all hippocampal
regions at 2 h following contextual fear conditioning,
compared to basal levels as measured in unconditioned/
uninjected control rats. These elevated levels gradually
declined at 4 and 6 h. At 6 h, levels appeared to be no
different than in unconditioned/uninjected controls. Impor-
tantly, hippocampal administration of IL-1h blocked or
reduced the conditioning-induced increase. A 2�4�8
ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of Drug
[F(1,400)=27.4, Pb0.0001], a significant main effect of
Time [F(3,400)=8.85, Pb0.0001], and a significant main
effect of Brain Region [F(7,400)=7.83, Pb0.0001]. There
was also a signif icant Drug�Time interact ion
[F(3,400)=1.38, Pb0.0001], a significant Drug�Brain
Region interaction [F(7,400)=2.764, Pb0.01], a significant
Time�Brain Region interaction [ F (21,400)=8.596,
Pb0.0001], and a significant Drug�Time�Brain Region
interaction [F(21,400)=1.611, Pb0.05]. A representative
photomicrograph of each condition at the 2 hr time point is
presented in Fig. 3.
rior cortical regions 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 h following contextual fear conditioning.
to hippocampal regions, and there were no differences between vehicle- and
Fig. 5. Mean percent freezing during the contextual fear test. IL-1h-treatedrats showed a significant memory impairment compared with vehicle-
treated rats. *Pb0.05. Bars=S.E.M.
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126124
Individual ANOVAs for each brain region revealed
significantly higher BDNF mRNA in the vehicle-treated
groups than in the IL-1h-treated groups, in the dorsal CA1
[F(1,50)=19.99, Pb0.0001] and ventral CA1 [F(1,50)=6.65,
Pb0.013 regions], ventral CA2 region [F(1,50)=8.48,
Pb0.01] and dorsal DG [F(1,52)=4.85, Pb0.04], and ventral
DG [F(1,50)=6.00, Pb0.02]. There was no significant main
effect of Drug in the dorsal CA2, dorsal and ventral CA3, or
anterior and posterior cortical regions.
The pattern of results was quite different in the cortical
areas (see Fig. 4). In both cortical areas, BDNF mRNA
expression was very low compared to any hippocampal
region and there were no effects of intrahippocampal IL-1h.There was a significant time effect in both the anterior
[F(3,51)=6.15, Pb0.01] and posterior [F(3,51)=13.54,
Pb0.0001] cortical areas. In these areas, BDNF mRNA
expression was highest at 0.5 h and gradually declined down
to basal levels at 6 h.
3.2. Experiment 2
The results of the behavioral experiment are shown in
Fig. 5. An ANOVA revealed a significant difference in
freezing behavior between IL-1h-treated rats (n=8) and
vehicle-treated rats (n=10) [ F(1,16)=6.11, Pb0.03].
Vehicle-treated rats froze significantly more of the time
(69%) than did IL-1h-treated rats (43%).
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence that
elevated IL-1h in the hippocampus reduces BDNF mRNA
expression in most regions of the rat hippocampus following
a hippocampal-dependent learning task, and that it does so
in a time-dependent manner.
IL-1h did not reduce BDNF mRNA in cortical regions,
although it should be remembered that IL-1h was injected
into the hippocampus, not cortex. These data also support
previous findings that contextual fear conditioning induces a
large and rapid increase in BDNF mRNA in the hippo-
campus (Hall et al., 2000). However, we found the increase
to occur 2 h—not 0.5 h—following contextual fear
conditioning, as did Hall et al. (2000). Perhaps the stress
associated with the microinjection that occurred immedi-
ately following conditioning delayed the rise in BDNF
mRNA. Also, since our first time point after 0.5 h was 2 h,
the rise could have occurred anytime between those time
points. Thus, the delay may not have been as long as it
appears here.
The most striking increases in BDNF following
conditioning and the most robust blockade of BDNF
increases by IL-1h occurred in the CA1 region. This was
so despite the fact that basal BDNF mRNA levels were
lower in CA1 than in most other hippocampal regions.
This result is particularly intriguing because the CA1
region gives rise to substantially greater cortical and
subcortical connections than the DG, CA3, or CA2 fields
(van Groen and Wyss, 1990), and is critically important
for hippocampal-dependent memory formation (Shimizu
et al., 2000).
Memory for the conditioning context was also signifi-
cantly impaired by the IL-1h administration. These data
support a growing body of evidence showing that elevated
levels of proinflammatory cytokines impair hippocampal-
dependent memory (Barrientos et al., 2002, 2003; Giber-
tini et al., 1995; Oitzl et al., 1993; Pugh et al., 1999,
2001; Yirmiya et al., 2002). Therefore, conditions that
result in significantly elevated levels of IL-1h in the
hippocampus are of particular concern with regards to
cognition.
The behavioral data, together with the in situ hybrid-
ization data, further support the hypothesis that IL-1h-produced memory impairments are mediated via reduc-
tions in hippocampal BDNF mRNA expression. As
discussed earlier, LTP may be a critical process for
forming short-term as well as long-term hippocampal-
dependent memories. It is known that IL-1h inhibits LTP
in the rat hippocampus (Bellinger et al., 1993; Cunning-
ham et al., 1996; Vereker et al., 2000a,b), and BDNF
reductions could also be involved in the mediation of this
interference. For example, BDNF is required for the
induction of LTP in CA1 neurons (Alonso et al., 2002;
Gartner and Staiger, 2002; Korte et al., 1995). Therefore,
IL-1h-mediated BDNF reductions may precede the IL-1h-mediated LTP inhibition.
In addition, IL-1h also causes a profound decrease of
glutamatergic transmission, but not GABAergic inhibition,
in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (Luk et al., 1999).
Since NMDA receptor activation is necessary for LTP
(Shimizu et al., 2000), and because BDNF, through its
receptor trkB, is critically necessary to potentiate NMDA
receptor activity (Levine et al., 1998; Levine and Kolb,
2000; Sun et al., 2001), this may be another mechanism
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126 125
involved in IL-1h-mediated impairment of hippocampal-
dependent memories.
BDNF-dependent forms of LTP require activation of L-
type voltage-gated calcium channels (Zakharenko et al.,
2003), and inhibiting calcium release or calcium channel
function prevents BDNF function (Balkowiec and Katz,
2002). Given these findings, it is intriguing that IL-1h has
been shown to inhibit voltage-gated calcium channel
currents in CA1 neurons (Plata-Salaman and ffrench-
Mullen, 1994), an effect that was blocked by IL-1ra.
Although the present data suggest that IL-1h decreases
BDNF mRNA expression, they do not indicate the
mechanism(s) by which this effect comes about. BDNF is
at least in part a CREB-mediated gene (Shieh et al., 1998;
Tao et al., 1998), and there are a number of ways in which
IL-1h receptor signaling could impact on CREB-mediated
transcription. For example, nuclear calcium signaling has
been shown to control CREB-mediated gene expression
(Hardingham et al., 2001) and, as discussed, IL-1h can
inhibit calcium channel currents. Alternatively, IL-1hsignaling activates the NFk-B pathway, and NFk-B com-
petes for the CREB-binding protein (Parry and Mackman,
1997) that is necessary for CREB-mediated transcription
(Kwok et al., 1994). There are other possible mechanisms as
well, but the present data do not address this issue.
Finally, the present data may be of clinical relevance
since patients with Alzheimer’s disease and AIDS dementia
complex (ADC) show both elevated levels of brain
proinflammatory cytokines (Cacabelos et al., 1991; Gallo
et al., 1991; Lombardi et al., 1999; Sheng et al., 1995) and
striking memory impairments (McArthur et al., 1999;
Salmon et al., 1988; Stern et al., 2001; Tross et al., 1988).
Moreover, BDNF is significantly diminished in the hippo-
campi in both of these populations (Boven et al., 1999;
Hock et al., 2000; Murray et al., 1994; Phillips et al., 1991).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grants F32-MH64339
and RO1-MH65656.
References
Alonso, M., Vianna, M.R., Depino, A.M., Mello e Souza, T., Pereira, P.,
Szapiro, G., Viola, H., Pitossi, F., Izquierdo, I., Medina, J.H., 2002.
BDNF-triggered events in the rat hippocampus are required for both
short- and long-term memory formation. Hippocampus 12, 551–560.
Balkowiec, A., Katz, D.M., 2002. Cellular mechanisms regulating activity-
dependent release of native brain-derived neurotrophic factor from
hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 10399–10407.
Barrientos, R.M., Higgins, E.A., Sprunger, D.B., Watkins, L.R., Rudy, J.W.,
Maier, S.F., 2002. Memory for context is impaired by a post context
exposure injection of interleukin-1 beta into dorsal hippocampus.
Behav. Brain Res. 134, 291–298.
Barrientos, R.M., Sprunger, D.B., Campeau, S., Higgins, E.A., Watkins,
L.R., Rudy, J.W., Maier, S.F., 2003. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
mRNA downregulation produced by social isolation is blocked by
intrahippocampal interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Neuroscience 121,
847–853.
Bellinger, F.P., Madamba, S., Siggins, G.R., 1993. Interleukin-1 beta
inhibits synaptic strength and long-term potentiation in the rat CA1
hippocampus. Brain Res. 628, 227–234.
Bliss, T.V.P., Lomo, T., 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic
transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following
stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 232, 331–356.
Boven, L.A., Middel, J., Portegies, P., Verhoef, J., Jansen, G.H., Nottet, H.S.,
1999. Overexpression of nerve growth factor and basic fibroblast growth
factor in AIDS dementia complex. J. Neuroimmunol. 97, 154–162.
Brady, L.S., Lynn, A.B., Herkenham, M., Gottesfeld, Z., 1994. Systemic
interleukin-1 induces early and late patterns of c-fos mRNA expression
in brain. J. Neurosci. 14, 4951–4964.
Cacabelos, R., Barquero, M., Garcia, P., Alvarez, X.A., Varela de Seijas, E.,
1991. Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) in Alzheimer’s
disease and neurological disorders. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharma-
col. 13, 455–458.
Cunningham, A.J., Murray, C.A., O’Neil, L.A.J., Lynch, M.A., O’Connor,
J.J., 1996. Interleukin-1 (IL-1 ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibit
long-term potentiation in the rat dentate gyrus in vitro. Neurosci. Lett.
203, 17–20.
Ericsson, A., Kovacs, K.J., Sawchenko, P.E., 1994. A functional anatomical
analysis of central pathways subserving the effects of interleukin-1 on
stress-related neuroendocrine neurons. J. Neurosci. 14, 897–913.
Gallo, P., Laverda, A.M., De Rossi, A., Pagni, S., Del Mistro, A., Cogo, P.,
Piccino, M.G., Plebani, A., Tavolato, B., Chieco-Bianchi, L., 1991.
Immunological markers in the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-1-infected
children. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 80, 659–666.
Gartner, A., Staiger, V., 2002. Neurotrophin secretion from hippocampal
neurons evoked by long-term-potentiation-inducing electrical stimula-
tion patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 6386–6391.
Gibertini, M., Newton, C., Friedman, H., Klein, T.W., 1995. Spatial
learning impairment in mice infected with Legionella pneumophila or
administered exogenous interleukin-1 beta. Brain Behav. Immun. 9,
113–128.
Hall, J., Thomas, K.L., Everitt, B.J., 2000. Rapid and selective induction of
BDNF expression in the hippocampus during contextual learning. Nat.
Neurosci. 3, 533–535.
Hardingham, G.E., Arnold, F.J., Bading, H., 2001. Nuclear calcium
signaling controls CREB-mediated gene expression triggered by
synaptic activity. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 261–267.
Hock, C., Heese, K., Hulette, C., Rosenberg, C., Otten, U., 2000. Region-
specific neurotrophin imbalances in Alzheimer disease: decreased levels
of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and increased levels of nerve
growth factor in hippocampus and cortical areas. Arch. Neurol. 57,
846–851.
Korte, M., Carroll, P., Wolf, E., Brem, G., Thoenen, H., Bonhoeffer, T.,
1995. Hippocampal long-term potentiation is impaired in mice lacking
brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92,
8856–8860.
Kwok, R.P., Lundblad, J.R., Chrivia, J.C., Richards, J.P., Bachinger, H.P.,
Brennan, R.G., Roberts, S.G., Green, M.R., Goodman, R.H., 1994.
Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB.
Nature 370, 223–226.
Lapchak, P.A., Araujo, D.M., Hefti, F., 1993. Systemic interleukin-1 beta
decreases brain-derived neurotrophic factor messenger RNA expression
in the rat hippocampal formation. Neuroscience 53, 297–301.
Laye, S., Parnet, P., Goujon, E., Dantzer, R., 1994. Peripheral admin-
istration of lipopolysaccharide induces the expression of cytokine
transcripts in the brain and pituitary of mice. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
27, 157–162.
Lee, J., Duan, W., Mattson, M.P., 2002. Evidence that brain-derived
neurotrophic factor is required for basal neurogenesis and mediates, in
part, the enhancement of neurogenesis by dietary restriction in the
hippocampus of adult mice. J. Neurochem. 82, 1367–1375.
R.M. Barrientos et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 155 (2004) 119–126126
Levine, E.S., Kolb, J.E., 2000. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor increases
activity of NR2B-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in excised
patches from hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 62, 357–362.
Levine, E.S., Crozier, R.A., Black, I.B., Plummer, M.R., 1998. Brain-
derived neurotrophic factor modulates hippocampal synaptic trans-
mission by increasing N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor activity. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10235–10239.
Linthorst, A.C., Flachskamm, C., Muller-Preuss, P., Holsboer, F., Reul,
J.M., 1995. Effect of bacterial endotoxin and interleukin-1 beta on
hippocampal serotonergic neurotransmission, behavioral activity, and
free corticosterone levels: an in vivo microdialysis study. J. Neurosci.
15, 2920–2934.
Lombardi, V.R., Garcia, M., Rey, L., Cacabelos, R., 1999. Characterization
of cytokine production, screening of lymphocyte subset patterns and in
vitro apoptosis in healthy and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) individuals. J.
Neuroimmunol. 97, 163–171.
Luk, W.P., Zhang, Y., White, T.D., Lue, F.A., Wu, C., Jiang, C.G., Zhang,
L., Moldofsky, H., 1999. Adenosine: a mediator of interleukin-1beta-
induced hippocampal synaptic inhibition. J. Neurosci. 19, 4238–4244.
Lynch, M.A., 1998. Age-related impairment in long-term potentiation in
hippocampus: a role for the cytokine, interleukin-1 beta? Prog.
Neurobiol. 56, 571–589.
Ma, Y.L., Wang, H.L., Wu, H.C., Wei, C.L., Lee, E.H., 1998. Brain-derived
neurotrophic factor antisense oligonucleotide impairs memory retention
and inhibits long-term potentiation in rats. Neuroscience 82, 957–967.
Maier, S.F., Wakins, L.R., Nance, D.M., 2001. Multiple routes of action of
interleukin-1 on the nervous system. In: Ader, R., Felton, D.L., Cohen,
N.Psychoneuroimmunology vol. 1. Academic Press, pp. 563–583.
McArthur, J.C., Sacktor, N., Selnes, O., 1999. Human immunodeficiency
virus-associated dementia. Semin. Neurol. 19, 129–150.
Messaoudi, E., Ying, S.W., Kanhema, T., Croll, S.D., Bramham, C.R.,
2002. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor triggers transcription-
dependent, late phase long-term potentiation in vivo. J. Neurosci.
22, 7453–7461.
Mizuno, M., Yamada, K., Olariu, A., Nawa, H., Nabeshima, T., 2000.
Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in spatial memory
formation and maintenance in a radial arm maze test in rats. J. Neurosci.
20, 7116–7121.
Morris, R.G.M., Anderson, E., Lynch, G.S., Baudry, M., 1986. Selective
impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-
methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319, 774–776.
Murray, K.D., Gall, C.M., Jones, E.G., Isackson, P.J., 1994. Differential
regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and type II calcium/
calmodulin-dependent protein kinase messenger RNA expression in
Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 60, 37–48.
Nguyen, K.T., Deak, T., Owens, S.M., Kohno, T., Fleshner, M., Watkins,
L.R., Maier, S.F., 1998. Exposure to acute stress induces brain
interleukin-1beta protein in the rat. J. Neurosci. 18, 2239–2246.
Oitzl, M.S., van Oers, H., Schobitz, B., de Kloet, E.R., 1993. Interleukin-1
beta, but not Interleukin-6, impairs spatial navigation learning. Brain
Res. 613, 160–163.
Parry, G.C., Mackman, N., 1997. Role of cyclic AMP response element-
binding protein in cyclic AMP inhibition of NF-kappaB-mediated
transcription. J. Immunol. 159, 5450–5456.
Perry, V.H., Newman, T.A., Cunningham, C., 2003. The impact of systemic
infection on the progression of neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev.
Neurosci. 4, 103–112.
Phillips, H.S., Hains, J.M., Armanini, M., Laramee, G.R., Johnson, S.A.,
Winslow, J.W., 1991. BDNF mRNA is decreased in the hippocampus of
individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 7, 695–702.
Plata-Salaman, C.R., ffrench-Mullen, J.M., 1994. Interleukin-1 beta inhibits
Ca2+ channel currents in hippocampal neurons through protein kinase
C. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 266, 1–10.
Pugh, C.R., Nguyen, K.T., Gonyea, J.L., Fleshner, M., Wakins, L.R., Maier,
S.F., Rudy, J.W., 1999. Role of interleukin-1 beta in impairment of
contextual fear conditioning caused by social isolation. Behav. Brain
Res. 106, 109–118.
Pugh, C.R., Fleshner, M., Watkins, L.R., Maier, S.F., Rudy, J.W., 2001. The
immune system and memory consolidation: a role for the cytokine IL-
1beta. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25, 29–41.
Reichenberg, A., Yirmiya, R., Schuld, A., Kraus, T., Haack, M., Morag, A.,
Pollmacher, T., 2001. Cytokine-associated emotional and cognitive
disturbances in humans. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 58, 445–452.
Salmon, D.P., Shimamura, A.P., Butters, N., Smith, S., 1988. Lexical and
semantic priming deficits in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Clin.
Exp. Neuropsychol. 10, 477–494.
Sheng, J.G., Mrak, R.E., Griffin, W.S.T., 1995. Microglial interleukin-
1a expression in brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation
with neuritic plaque distribution. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 21,
290–301.
Shieh, P.B., Hu, S.C., Bobb, K., Timmusk, T., Ghosh, A., 1998.
Identification of a signaling pathway involved in calcium regulation
of BDNF expression. Neuron 20, 727–740.
Shimizu, E., Tang, Y.P., Rampon, C., Tsien, J.Z., 2000. NMDA receptor-
dependent synaptic reinforcement as a crucial process for memory
consolidation. Science 290, 1170–1174.
Stern, Y., McDermott, M.P., Albert, S., Palumbo, D., Selnes, O.A.,
McArthur, J., Sacktor, N., Schifitto, G., Kieburtz, K., Epstein, L.,
Marder, K.S., 2001. Factors associated with incident human immuno-
deficiency virus-dementia. Arch. Neurol. 58, 473–479.
Sun, J.H., Yan, X.Q., Xiao, H., Zhou, J.W., Chen, Y.Z., Wang, C.A., 2001.
Restoration of decreased N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor activity by
brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the cultured hippocampal neurons:
involvement of cAMP. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 394, 209–215.
Tao, X., Finkbeiner, S., Arnold, D.B., Shaywitz, A.J., Greenberg, M.E.,
1998. Ca2+ influx regulates BDNF transcription by a CREB family
transcription factor-dependent mechanism. Neuron 20, 709–726.
Tross, S., Price, R.W., Navia, B., Thaler, H.T., Gold, J., Hirsch, D.A.,
Sidtis, J.J., 1988. Neuropsychological characterization of the AIDS
dementia complex: a preliminary report. Aids 2, 81–88.
Tyler, W.J., Alonso, M., Bramham, C.R., Pozzo-Miller, L.D., 2002. From
acquisition to consolidation: on the role of brain-derived neurotrophic
factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning. Learn. Mem. 9,
224–237.
van Groen, T., Wyss, J.M., 1990. Extrinsic projections from area CA1 of
the rat hippocampus: olfactory, cortical, subcortical, and bilateral
hippocampal formation projections. J. Comp. Neurol. 302, 515–528.
Vereker, E., Campbell, V., Roche, E., McEntee, E., Lynch, M.A., 2000.
Lipopolysaccharide inhibits long-term potentiation in the rat dentate
gyrus by activating caspase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26252–26258.
Vereker, E., O’Donnell, E., Lynch, M.A., 2000. The inhibitory effect of
interleukin-1beta on long-term potentiation is coupled with increased
activity of stress-activated protein kinases. J. Neurosci. 20, 6811–6819.
Yirmiya, R., Winocur, G., Goshen, I., 2002. Brain interleukin-1 is involved
in spatial memory and passive avoidance conditioning. Neurobiol.
Learn. Mem. 78, 379–389.
Zakharenko, S.S., Patterson, S.L., Dragatsis, I., Zeitlin, S.O., Siegelbaum,
S.A., Kandel, E.R., Morozov, A., 2003. Presynaptic BDNF required for
a presynaptic but not postsynaptic component of LTP at hippocampal
CA1–CA3 synapses. Neuron 39, 975–990.