AWES Minutes - Q1 2012 Actions Summary Attendees

AWES Minutes - Q1 2012

AG3362-AWES-240112-Minutes_b.docx, 10th Feb 2012 1

Meeting type: Advanced Well Equipment Standards Group – 2012 Q1 Meeting Date: Wednesday 25th & Thursday 26th Jan 2012 Venue: Eni Offices, Milan, Italy

Actions Summary

Ser Action By By when

1 Initiate survey of existing standards/ guidelines and reliability issues OTM/ALL Ongoing

2 Invite members to share existing internal testing standards OTM Ongoing

3 Consider potential for JIP to understand downhole conditions in parallel to other activities.

OTM / DHE WGL

Ongoing

4 Consider JIP for encapsulation qualification standards OTM / CCL WGL

Ongoing

5 Invite subsea control vendors OTM Ongoing

6 Invite cables, control lines (hydraulic, electric and fiberoptics and connector companies to participate

OTM Ongoing

7 To encourage Petrobras, ConocoPhillips, Murphy Oil, Anadarko, Total and others to join group

OTM Ongoing

9 Seek ISO framework (structure, format, ranges/ scenarios etc OTM Next Meeting

9 Engage hydraulic control line reps / Get hydraulic connector presentation so we can discuss issue or reliability of hydraulic connectors

OTM Next Meeting

10 Draft one page outline JIP proposal for Subsea Feedthrough JIP, circulate and setup half day launch meeting alongside next AWES mtg

OTM Next Meeting

11 OTM to provide guest agreement based on that used for SEAFOM for guests at all future meetings

OTM Next Meeting

12 OTM to seek US and European representation for all members to ensure continuity through meetings

OTM Next Meeting

13 Manage communication between different workgroup leaders to prevent duplication and ensure consistency

OTM Ongoing

14 WG 1 - CCL - Implement existing qualification tests on Impact testing, Abrasion and compatibility

WG 1 Next Telecon

15 WG 2 - OHZI - All to get copies of ISO 144998 and Template, Tech Specs, Supplier Manufacturer performance, Packer Types

WG 2 Next Telecon

16 WG 3 - DE - Table of Content for review WG 3 17-25 Feb

Attendees

Company Contact E-Mail

Justin Bowersock Baker [email protected]

Terry Bussear Baker [email protected]

Facchini Massimo Brugg Cables [email protected]

Franco Botazzi eni [email protected]

Carmen Repetto eni [email protected]

Bruce Scott Halliburton [email protected]

Graham Edmonstone Maersk [email protected]

Jesse Cochrane Mid South Control Line [email protected]

Iain Coates Nexen [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]





Annie Hairsine OTM [email protected]

Shan Vahora OTM [email protected]

Amato Gusmeroli OMV [email protected]

Andy Gorrara Read Well Services [email protected]

Michael Scott Roxar [email protected]

Terje Baustad Roxar [email protected]

Cliff Westwood RSCC [email protected]

Wolfgang Faist RWE Dea [email protected]

Stephan Schröder RWE Dea [email protected]

Ramaswamy Meyyappan Schlumberger [email protected]

Stephen Pride Schlumberger [email protected]

Odd Geir Svela Statoil [email protected]

Tim Davis TAM [email protected]

Brian Drakeley Weatherford [email protected]

Dean Lehner Weatherford [email protected]

Graeme Bedborough Weatherford [email protected]

Sean Yakeley Weatherford [email protected]

Matthew Crump Weatherford [email protected]

Apologies

Company Contact E-Mail

Simon Kelly Expro [email protected]

Grant MacKinlay Nexen [email protected]

Paul Hazel Welltec [email protected]

Lilian Izquierdo / Shawn Pace Chevron [email protected]

Walter Constantine Prysmian Group









Presentation Slides A copy of the slides presented during the meeting is contained within Appendix 1 of these minutes.



1 Introduction & Objectives Annie Hairsine (OTM) welcomed everybody to the Advanced Well Equipment Standards (AWES) Group Quarter 1 2012 meeting following the kick off meeting in September 2011. The objectives of the meeting were outlined as follows:

To provide a quarterly update to the Steering Committee on work group progress and future focus area

To facilitate further development of the workgroups All participants were invited to introduce themselves. Contact details of attendees are shown at the front of these minutes.

2 Update on Group Status 2.1 Background to AWES Annie Hairsine (OTM) outlined the background to the Advanced Well Equipment Standards Group describing how Lars Vinje (Statoil) had championed the concept initially and presented it to the oil company members of the PEA IWC group. Since that time launch meetings had been held in Houston and Amsterdam to substantiate interest with 19 companies agreeing to sign up as members and the project kicking off in Sep 2011 in Houston where a chairman was appointed and 3 working groups were launched. 2.2 Previous meeting actions The actions from the kick off meeting were listed as follows with the status as shown:

Ser Action By Status

1 Enable website accounts OTM Complete

2 Set up dedicated Linked In group for AWES OTM Complete

3 Update work group participation matrix ALL Complete

4 Initiate survey of existing standards/ guidelines and reliability issues OTM/ALL Ongoing

5 Invite members to share existing internal testing standards OTM Ongoing

6 Consider potential for JIP to understand downhole conditions in parallel to other activities.

OTM / DHE WGL

Ongoing

7 Consider JIP for encapsulation qualification standards OTM / CCL WGL

Ongoing

8 Include equipment priority listing and definition on agenda of SC meetings OTM Today

Present WG schedules at each SC meeting OTM / WGLs

Today

9 Invite subsea control vendors OTM Ongoing

10 Invite out of industry expertise to share in failure mode analysis and reporting methods OTM Q1/12

11 Invite cables, control lines (hydraulic, electric and fiberoptics and connector companies to participate

OTM Ongoing


OTM Ongoing

13 Coordinate workshop schedule for 2012 OTM Today

2.3 Membership Status Annie outlined the current membership status as shown in the table below:

Members as at 25th Jan 2012

Actively pursuing membership through legal departments

Interested Attempting to reach

Baker Hughes ENI Brugg Cables Aker Solutions

BP Maersk Expro BHP Billiton

Chevron Petrobras OMV Cameron

Halliburton Prysmian ConocoPhillips

Mid South Control Lines Read Well Services FMC Technologies

Nexen GE

Roxar Saudi Aramco

RSCC Cables & Control Shell



Lines

RWE Dea Teledyne Technologies

Schlumberger TOTAL

Statoil

TAM International

Weatherford

Welltec

2.4 Website Update All were reminded that the AWES website was now live (http://www.awes-group.com). Members can access the website to acquire member contact details, copies of existing qualification specifications and copies of presentations and meeting minutes.

3 Steering Group Matters 3.1 Priority of Equipments Annie presented the priority of equipments which had already been identified with the top three being undertaken by work groups as follows:

Cables, Control Lines & Connectors

Open hole zonal isolation

Electronics in downhole tools

Downhole sensors

ICVs

IWIS for hydraulic systems

ICDs/ Sand Screens

Components forming the barrier envelope (production packer)

ESPs It was widely agreed that Sandscreens, ICVs and ESPs needed to be removed because they are already covered in other standards however other equipments which have standards but are not covered sufficiently will need to be considered. Graham Edmonstone (Maersk) felt that adding gas lift to the list of equipment could have been a quick win for the group. It was also felt that there is a need to include safety valve, chemical injection valve, connectors and clamps to the list of equipment covered in AWES. Graham Edmonstone enquired whether SCMs will be included in the scope of work as this had been raised by Lars Vinje (Statoil) with Shell voicing similar issues. It was suggested by Bruce Scott and Odd Geir that SIIS and IWIS should cover SCMs but it was generally felt that more standardized SCMs were needed. Outside of this group as an industry there is a need to standardize interfaces of SCM. Overall it was agreed that launching four workgroups at the same time would be impossible. It was widely agreed that there needs to be a prioritization of workgroups as some companies felt they couldn’t afford to bring 6 or 7 people every time to the meetings. It was also felt that it was important to decide how big the standards needed to be. Once that is consensually agreed the resource allocation can be managed much more effectively. Dean Lehner, Weatherford also expressed his reservation at some of the timelines set by AWES as he felt they were too aggressive. This would reviewed by each workgroup. 3.2 Consistency between work groups Graham Edmonstone (Maersk) re-iterated the need to make sure different groups were tied-in together as there was no point in having separate standards. It was suggested OTM should proactively manage the communications between different work group leaders to ensure there was no duplication of work. ACTION OTM. 3.3 Inclusion of Oil majors

http://www.awes-group.com/



It was again felt that it was important to get as many large Oil companies involved in this process as possible such as CoP and TOTAL so that AWES can truly represent a whole industry effort. ACTION OTM. 3.4 ISO engagement Statoil re-iterated the need to consistently refer to ISOs that already exist such as ISO 14310 and also the need for any AWES group outputs to become an ISO or API Standard. Furthermore, a query was raised as to whether ISO had been approached whereupon Brian Drakeley (Weatherford) advised that from his experience in SEAFOM Fibre Optic Standards, if ISO are involved as early as possible it makes the process easier in the long term. Brian Drakeley also shared a qualification standard table used in SEAFOM and wondered whether that could be used in AWES. It was widely agreed that this may be relevant to some workgroups but was not expected to suit all. ACTION OTM to contact relevant ISO committees. 3.5 Testing clarification It was unanimously agreed that there should be full clarity between performance standard and design standard. It was decided that the AWES group was concerned with performance standards. 3.6 Corrosion Study and Part numbering There was a query on the inclusion of part numbering in this standardization process as it was identified that this process would help with communications due to differences in each company. After discussion it was felt that this should be kept out of scope. There was also a query from Terry Bussear (Baker) on whether a corrosion study should be part of the qualification whether this would be included in the scope of work. It was decided that this could be done in future but would not be appropriate now. 3.7 Work Group participation/Contribution All were reminded of the need for active participation from all members in the workgroups. This included quarterly workshops but also interim telecoms as this was not the sole responsibility of work group leaders. 3.8 Confidentiality All guests present were invited to state that they would comply with the principles of confidentiality in regards to working group discussions. All responded positively. OTM is to provide a guest agreement based on that used for SEAFOM for guest's at all future meetings – ACTION OTM.

4 Work Group Updates since last meeting 4.1 Cables and Control Lines Cliff Westwood (RSCC) described the work he had done in preparing a draft spec for cables. He hoped that the group could reach agreement on the format during the working group’s session on the next day. He emphasized the point of being consistent over time to achieve good results. 4.2 Open Hole Zonal Isolation Sean (Weatherford) stated that the Open Hole Zonal Isolation group would cover any open hole expandable tools including swellable packers. Items not included in this list should be considered already in ISO 14310.

4.3 Downhole Electronics Dean Lehner (Weatherford) and the Downhole Electronics group identified the need to make a decision on whether to include control or sensing products as it is not realistic to include both in the single group. There were some product lines which do both sense and control and the group would have to decide whether to include all of them. The exact scope of work still hadn’t been defined as such and the work would be redirected where the expertise lay. 4.4 Overall comments on three workgroups The full update done by work group leaders can be found in the attached presentations. Statoil requested that the standard should be generic enough and include as broad a range of products as possible. It was also suggested that qualification could be done at different levels and include different variables such as pressure, safety factors etc.



5 Knowledge Sharing Presentations The following guest companies gave introductions to their company activities.

Brugg Cables – Facchini Massimo

OMV - Amato Gusmeroli

Read International - Andy Gorrera

6 Working Group Developments Shan Vahora welcomed the group on Day 2 where the main agenda for the day was to split into the work groups and establish a plan of action for the next quarter. All were reminded of the outline best practice structure which could be used as a template for each workgroup.

Objective and scope

References

Definitions and abbreviations

Classification

System design

General requirements

Environmental conditions

Reliability

Documentation requirements

Qualification testing

SIT documentation

Design requirements (optional)

Functional requirements (optional)

Testing requirements The following agenda for the working group sessions was presented by each workgroup leader. 6.1.1 Cables and Control Lines

Review Draft Specification Format

Discussion of Cable Pressure Ratings

Calculations, Critical Variable, Tolerances, Safety Factors, etc

Discussion on Encapsulations

Purpose, Life Cycle, Critical Properties, Development of Qualification Tests. 6.1.2 Open Hole Zonal Isolation Operator Company Reps

Collect historical well parameter data showing the following information; geographic location, drilled hole diameter, calliper log diameter, current packer test requirement, BHT, BHP, etc

So far only received info back from Statoil, Nexen Service Company Reps

Provide brief overview of current packer test criteria for each packer type (inflatable, swellable, mechanical, etc)

So far received information back from WFT, HAL, BHI, TAM

Waiting on info from SLB 6.1.3 Downhole Electronics

Define ‘Downhole Electronics’

What equipment is covered under the standard

Discussion point – is this only electronics or is all Intelligent Well monitoring devices to be included?

Outline ‘Acceptance Criteria’ and how Testing is conducted. Reporting of results is to be standardized so comparison can be made efficiently.



Performance Minimums

Functionality

Performance

Drift

Accuracy

Resolution

Long Term Performance etc…

Metrology

NACE / API etc. What can be adapted that already exists?

Define ‘Stages of Qualification’

ISO standards, what can be adapted to meet our standard?

What do the Operators want to see?

Earlier discussions mentioned ‘Building Blocks’, for those of you that have recollection of this, please expand.

Develop a Standard way of reporting Metrology and Performance indicators

Define Failure Modes

7 Work Group Updates All work group updates and details of actions are presented in slide format and attached in this pack. 7.1 Agreed Actions 7.1.1 Cables and Control Lines RSCC / Cliff Westwood -

Revise Current Draft Specification to Remove Design Aspects

Add TEC Diagram in Definitions

Investigate Pressure Test Fixture Designs for Pressure Qualifications Weatherford / Graeme Bedborough & Ed Laffitte

Develop Draft of Impact Test Qualification Procedure

MSCL / Jessie Cochran

Investigate / Collect / Share Abrasion Testing Results Schlumberger / Ram Meyyappan

Get Authorization to Share SLB Cable Qualification Test Procedures/Processes Roxar/ Michael Scott

Get Authorization to Share Roxar Cable Specification and/or Qualification Test Procedures/Processes

7.1.2 Open Hole Zonal Isolation

Prepare Template for Standard Document - send the document prior next teleconference (TC) {Sean}

Technical Specification - Operators (Sec. 6) draft prior next TC2 {Odd}

Matrix - Prepare the (V-iv to V-III); draft prior next TC2 {Wolfgang}

Supplier Manufacturer Performance Section - Service (Sec. 7); draft prior next TC2 {Justin}

Annex A (Packer Types) - Draft prior next TC2 {Matthew} 7.1.3 Downhole Electronics – Now to be known as Downhole Gauges (Sensing)

Table of Contents

3-4 weeks for generation – Feb 17th-Feb 25th

2-3 weeks for group member review – March 8th for Webex/conference

Annie/Bruce Scott – Contact ISO for Template

Terje Baustad / Dean Lehner to populate draft Table of Contents using headings as template per 13628 pt 6

SCOPE Draft – Discussion ongoing



Qualification and Testing, QA/QC (still need to qualify what this is??) – Documentation traceability requirements etc…, FAT

Discussion Point – Documentation requirements/MTR requirements – can we specify in the standard, is this realistic? o Can this be discussed in the next AWES Chair meeting o Should be caution regarding inclusion of this in the standard – Personal comment

(Dean) 7.2 Long Term Plans 7.2.1 Electrical Feedthrough Subsea Systems Subsea Feedthrough Qualification JIP - It was agreed that a one page outline proposal with suggested scope and budget should be circulated to all interested parties and a tentative launch meeting scheduled alongside the next AWES meeting (extra half day) - Action – OTM. 7.2.2 Downhole Conditions JIP – should be placed on hold for now.

8 Next Meetings 8.1 Work Group Meetings

Work Group Date Details

WG 1 - Cables, Control Lines & Connectors 15.00 GMT Wed 14th March 2012 Via Webex

WG 2 - Open Hole Zonal Isolation 07.30 CST Tue 28th February 2012

+ Late March / Early April (TBA)

Via Webex

Via Webex

WG 3 - Downhole Electronics 15:00 GMT Thu 8th March 2012 Via Webex

8.2 Steering Committee Meetings The next AWES Steering Committee meeting (Q2) will be held 8/9th May 2012 in Houston, USA hosted by Weatherford. (Post Meeting Note: This has now been confirmed from 8am 8th May - lunch 9th May at Weatherford's offices on St James Place in Houston.) The Steering Committee also agreed to align dates with SEAFOM / SIIS for Quarter 3 and 4 meetings in 2012 to promote wider industry participation. Precise dates would be circulated at a later date however it was hoped that RSCC may be able to host in Connecticut in September. Q3 - September: (24 – 28 September) Hyatt Regency Hotel, 1 Ave De Lafayette, Boston, MA 02111, USA. Phone: +1 617 912 1234. Fax: +1 617 451 2198. Website: www.regencyboston.hyatt.com Q4 – (4 – 7th December): Victoria Park Plaza Hotel, Damrak 1-5, Amsterdam 1012 LG, The Netherlands. Phone: +31 (0) 20 62 34, Fax: +31 (0) 20 62 52 997. Website: http://www.parkplaza.com/amsterdamnl_victoria

9 Any Other Business 9.1 Declaration of Interest Brugg Cables, OMV and ReadWell indicated that they would make recommendations to their respective organisations to formally join the AWES membership – ACTION OTM. 9.2 WG Participation

http://www.regencyboston.hyatt.com/

http://www.parkplaza.com/amsterdamnl_victoria



OTM to seek US and European representation for all members to ensure continuity through meetings – ACTION OTM. The meeting was closed at 3.30pm.



Appendix 1 – Meeting Presentation Slides

AWES

Advanced Well Equipment

Standardisation Group

Milan – 25th -26th Jan 2012 Kindly hosted by Stefano Di Vincenzo & Franco Bottazzi, Eni E&P

2

Annie Hairsine & Shan Vahora OTM

Objectives of the meeting

3

• To provide a quarterly update to the Steering

Committee on work group progress and future

focus areas

• To facilitate further development of the

workgroups

Agenda – Day 1

4

Wednesday 25th Jan 2012 Arrival with Lunch 12.00

Group Update 1 Introductions & Meeting objectives Annie Hairsine, OTM 12.45 2 Update on Group Status

a. Objectives of Group b. Recent activity against schedule c. Membership status d. Website Update

Annie Hairsine, OTM 13.15

3 Steering Committee Matters a. Definition & Priority of equipments

All 13.45

Tea & Coffee 14.30

Work Group Updates 4 Work Group Updates (Status, Progress since last meeting, Ongoing

Actions) a. Cables, Control Lines & Connectors b. Open Hole Zonal Isolation c. Downhole electronics

WG Leaders 15.00

Knowledge Sharing Presentations 5 Knowledge Sharing Presentations (3 x 10mins) New Companies 15.45 6 Day 1 review Annie Hairsine, OTM 16.15

End of Day 16.30

AWES Dinner 19.30

Agenda – Day 2

5

Thursday 26th Jan 2012

Arrival with Tea & Coffee 08.30 7 Day 2 welcome Shan Vahora, OTM 09.00

Working Group Development # 1 8 Working Groups

a. Cables & Control Lines b. Open Hole Zonal Isolation c. Downhole electronics

Working Groups 09.10

Tea & Coffee 10.30 9 Working Group Feedback WG Leaders 11.20

Lunch 12.00

Working Group Development # 2 10 Ongoing Working Group Discussion Working Groups 12.45

Tea & Coffee 14.30 11 Feedback & Actions for Next Quarter WG Leaders 14.45 12 Group Long term plans discussion

a. Beyond the Pilot Groups b. Proposed JIP to qualify subsea electrical feed through systems

All

15.15

13 Next meetings/ AOB Shan Vahora, OTM 15.45

Meeting Close 16.00

Meeting Admin

6

• Administration

• Refreshments • Toilets • Mobile phones switched off or turned to silent/vibrate • Work Packs • Dinner

• Minutes will be circulated after meeting together with attendee list • Group website; www.awes-group.com host to all documents – access restricted to members

http://www.awes-group.com/�



Introductions

7

Please take 30 seconds to:

• Introduce yourself • Your relationship to Advanced Well Equipment • Objectives for this meeting • (Has anything changed for you since Sep?)

• Apologies from Chevron, Expro, Welltec & Nexen

Update on group

status

8

Background to AWES

9

• In Oct 2009 at PICT & PEA IWC meetings in Copenhagen, Lars Vinje (Statoil) discussed with other industry representatives the need for a (qualification) standards group to ultimately improve the reliability of Advanced Well equipments (IWC, ICDs, etc)

• May 2011 – Launch meetings held in conjunction with PICT (Inflow Control Technology) network meeting in Houston and SIIS / SEAFOM meetings in Amsterdam - 19 companies indicated intention to sign up.

• Sep 2011 – AWES officially kicked off with the ultimate objective of: • Developing best practice guidelines (and ultimately standards) for the qualification of a

group of Advanced Well Equipments • Chairmen appointed and 3 x Working Groups launched

Group Structure

• Chairmen:

• Odd Geir Svela (Statoil), • Terry Bussear (Baker)

• Steering Committee

• One representative from each member organisation

• Work Groups • Led by designated work group leader • Supporting work group from membership

10

Group Charter Vision:

To promote reliable advanced well equipments across the industry

Overall Objectives:

• Development of test qualification procedures and standards for advanced well equipments

• Definition of how to measure sensor system performance • Sharing of results from prior testing work & lessons learnt • To raise the level of requirements and set a standard for vendors in terms of

qualifying their technology for an advanced well application • To gain confidence in lifetime expectancy of downhole sensors • To reduce the need for oil companies to run their own independent qualification

testing • To assist vendors to understand oil company requirements • QA/ QC

11

Scope of equipments

Inclusion of the following equipments:

• Downhole sensors • Electronics in downhole tools • ICVs • Open hole zonal isolation • IWIS for hydraulic systems • ICDs/ Sand Screens • Components forming the barrier envelope (production packer) • ESPs • Cables, Control Lines & Connectors

12

Outline of activities

13

Priority of equipment

• Classification of equipments

Review existing

standards

• Include ISO, API, SEAFOM, IWIS etc

• Include internal standards

• Identify gaps

Understand downhole conditions

• JIP initiation

Define test requirements

• Failure Mode Analysis • Agree standards • Establish best practice guideline

Conformance Testing

Knowledge Sharing Lessons Learnt Identifying best practice

Pilot Programme

• Cables & Control Lines • Open hole zonal isolation • Downhole electronics

Sep 2011 Sep 2012........... ........Sep 2014

Year 1 - Schedule

14

2011 2012

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

8.Wider adoption (API/ ISO)

4. Identify gaps 3. Survey of reliability issues

Activity

5. Confirm contents

Pilot Groups Launch

Liaison with API / ISO

2. Survey of existing standards

Data gathering – existing standards

1. Confirm scope of equipment

Face to face ¼ ly wksps

1/24/12

6. Draft content 7. Review content

Web conference

(Downhole test conditions JIP)

Review of Actions from Previous Meeting

Ser Action By By when

1 Enable website accounts OTM Complete 2 Set up dedicated Linked In group for AWES OTM Complete 3 Update work group participation matrix ALL Complete 4 Initiate survey of existing standards/ guidelines and reliability issues OTM/ALL Ongoing 5 Invite members to share existing internal testing standards OTM Ongoing 6 Consider potential for JIP to understand downhole conditions in parallel to

other activities. OTM / DHE WGL Ongoing

7 Consider JIP for encapsulation qualification standards OTM / CCL WGL Ongoing 8 Include equipment priority listing and definition on agenda of SC meetings OTM Today

Present WG schedules at each SC meeting OTM / WGLs Today 9 Invite subsea control vendors OTM Ongoing 10 Invite out of industry expertise to share in failure mode analysis and reporting

methods OTM Q1/12

11 Invite cables, control lines (hydraulic, electric and fiberoptics) and connector companies to participate

OTM Ongoing


OTM Ongoing

13 Coordinate workshop schedule for 2012 OTM Today

15

Membership Status

16

Welltec®

http://www.r-scc.com/index.asp�

http://www.controlline.com/�

Welcome to our guests

17

Website www.awes-group.com

• Secure members only access

• Member contact details • Copies of existing qualification specifications • Copies of presentations & meeting minutes

18

Steering Committee

Matters

19

Definition & Priority of Equipment

20

Equipment Group

1. Cables, Control Lines & Connectors 2. Open hole zonal isolation 3. Electronics in downhole tools

• Downhole sensors • ICVs • IWIS for hydraulic systems • ICDs/ Sand Screens • Components forming the barrier envelope (production packer) • ESPs • ...

Definition of equipment scope Equipment Definition of Scope


Open Hole Zonal Isolation

Downhole electronics

System Reliability

Downhole Sensors

ICVS

IWIS for hydraulic systems

ICDs / Sand Screens

Barrier envelope (production packer)

ESPs

...

21

Priority of equipments / work groups

22

1. Cables, Control Lines & Connectors 2011-14 2. Open hole zonal isolation 2011-12 3. Electronics in downhole tools 2011-14 4. System Reliability 2013- 5. Failure Definition ?

• Downhole sensors • ICVs • IWIS for hydraulic systems • ICDs/ Sand Screens • Components forming the barrier envelope (production packer) • ESPs • ...

Work Group Responsibilities (1/2)

23

Company WG 1 - Cables, Control Lines & Connectors WG 2 - Open Hole Zonal Isolation WG 3 - Downhole electronics

Baker

Graeme Young - [email protected] - Kevin Holmes - [email protected] (TBC) Roger Duncan - [email protected] (TBC)

Ed Wood - [email protected] Justin Bowersock - [email protected]

Gerald Whitley Jr - [email protected] -

BP

Mark Barrilleaux - [email protected] - +1 281 366 2486

Christine Cano - [email protected] BP

Chevron

Lilian Izquierdo - [email protected] Gary Corbett – [email protected] Shawn Pace - [email protected] - +1 832 854 5531


Donald Lanceslin – SME Subsea/Completion Integration – [email protected] Scott Wagstaff – SME IWC & Completion Equipment – [email protected] Alfredo Acevedo – SME Artificial Lift Systems – [email protected]

ENI Franco Bottazi - [email protected] Carmen Repetto - [email protected]

Stephano Di Vincenzo - [email protected]

Expro (TBC) Simon Kelly (TBC)

Halliburton

Kirby Schrader - [email protected] - +1 281 297 1218

Ron Hinkie - [email protected]; Pete Smith - Easywell [[email protected]]

Bruce Scott - [email protected] - +1.972.418.2787 Matthew Scogin - [email protected]

Maersk Graham Edmonstone - Maersk Patrick Moran -

[email protected] Graham Edmonstone - Maersk Mid South

Control Lines

Jesse Cochran - [email protected] - +1 281 204 7355 - -

Nexen Grant Mackinlay - [email protected] Iain Coates - [email protected] Alex Malcolm - [email protected]

Packers Plus

(TBC) - Robert Coon (TBC) -


24


Petrobras

Hardy Leonardo da Cunha Pereira Pinto - [email protected]



Read Well

Services (TBC) Read Well – Andy (TBC)

Roxar Roxar Roxar Michael Scott - [email protected] - +47 51 81 89 28

RSCC

Cliff Westwood - [email protected] - +1

860653 8338

Dustin Dulac - [email protected] - +1 860

653 8444 - -

RWE Stephan Schroeder - [email protected]

Krassimire Entchev Wolfgang Faist - [email protected] -

+49 40 6375-2592 RWE

Schlumberger

Ramaswamy Meyyappan - [email protected] Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Stephen Pride - [email protected] - +47 51944810 Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Statoil Lars Vinje - [email protected] Odd Geir Svela - [email protected] Stein Are Albertsen - [email protected] - +1 832 485 3662

TAM

International

Tim Davis - [email protected] - +1 713 292 1604 -

Teledyne (TBC) Allen Gould - [email protected] (TBC) - - Total (TBC) Sébastien Bourgoin (TBC)

Weatherford

Brian Drakeley - [email protected] Laffitte, Edward D - [email protected]

Sean Yakeley -

[email protected] Brian Davies - [email protected]

Dean Lehner - [email protected] -

+1.281.348.1033

Welltec Paul Hazel - [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]�




Work Group Activity

• Level of Participation / Contribution

• Needs active participants for 1/4ly wksp AND interim telcons

• Not sole responsibility of work group leaders • Seeking to share internal best practices / specifications of

all members

• Guest participation

• Any issues over confidentiality of information?

25

Work Group

Updates

26

Work Group Update

1. Status

2. Progress since last meeting

3. Ongoing actions

4. Objectives for next two days

27

Knowledge

Sharing

Presentations

28

Dinner

Meet in Hotel Lobby at 19.00hrs to walk to

restaurant

29

End of Day 1

30

AWES

Advanced Well Equipment

Standardisation Group

Milan – 25th -26th Jan 2012 Kindly hosted by Stefano Di Vincenzo & Franco Bottazzi, Eni E&P

31

Annie Hairsine & Shan Vahora OTM

Agenda – Day 2

32

Thursday 26th Jan 2012

Arrival with Tea & Coffee 08.30 7 Day 2 welcome Shan Vahora, OTM 09.00

Working Group Development # 1 8 Working Groups

a. Cables & Control Lines b. Open Hole Zonal Isolation c. Downhole electronics

Working Groups 09.10

Tea & Coffee 10.30 9 Working Group Feedback WG Leaders 11.20

Lunch 12.00

Working Group Development # 2 10 Ongoing Working Group Discussion Working Groups 12.45

Tea & Coffee 14.30 11 Feedback & Actions for Next Quarter WG Leaders 14.45 12 Group Long term plans discussion

a. Beyond the Pilot Groups b. Proposed JIP to qualify subsea electrical feed through systems

All

15.15

13 Next meetings/ AOB Shan Vahora, OTM 15.45

Meeting Close 16.00

Working Group

Development

33

Working Groups – Participants for today


• Cliff Westwood, RSCC

• Brian Drakeley, Weatherford • Ram, Schlumberger • Jesse Cochrane, Mid South • Franco Bottazi, ENI • Faccino Massimo, Brugg, • Michael Scott, Roxar • Stephan Schroeder, RWE

• Stay in this room (front)

Open Hole Zonal Isolation

• Sean Yakeley, Weatherford

• Tim Davis, TAM • Justin Bowersock, Baker • Carmen, ENI • Wolfgang Faist ,RWE • Odd Geir Svela, Statoil • Iain Coates, Nexen • Andy Gorrera, Read Well • Matthew Crump, Weatherford • Amato Gusmeroli, OMV

• Stay in this room (back)

Downhole electronics

• Dean Lehner, Weatherford • Terje Baustad, Roxar • Terry Bussear, Baker • Stephen Pride, Schlumberger • Stefano, Eni • Bruce Scott, Halliburton • Graham Edmonston, Maersk • Shan Vahora, OTM

• Down the hall where lunch was served yesterday

34

Proposed best practice guideline

structure

35

1. Objective and scope

2. References

3. Definitions and abbreviations

4. Classification

5. System design

General requirements

Environmental conditions

Reliability

6. Documentation requirements

Qualification testing

SIT documentation

For each equipment:

7. Design requirements (optional)

8. Functional requirements (optional)

9. Testing requirements

WG1- CCL

• Review Draft Specification Format

• Discussion of Cable Pressure Ratings

• Calculations, Critical Variable, Tolerances, Safety Factors, etc…

• Discussion on Encapsulations

• Purpose, Life Cycle, Critical Properties, Development of Qualification Tests.

36

WG2 - OHZI Operator Company Reps - Collect historical well parameter data showing the following information; geographic location, drilled hole diameter, caliper log diameter, current packer test requirement, BHT, BHP, etc,… - So far only received info back from Statoil, Nexen Service Company Reps - Provide brief overview of current packer test criteria for each packer type (inflatable, swellable, mechanical, etc,…) - So far received info back from WFT, HAL, BHI, TAM - Waiting on info from SLB

37

WG3 - DE

38

Define ‘Downhole Electronics’

•What equipment is covered under the standard

•Discussion point – is this only electronics or are all Intelligent Well monitoring devices to be included?

Outline ‘Acceptance Criteria’ and how Testing is conducted. Reporting of results is to be standardized so comparison can be made efficiently.

•Performance Minimums

•Functionality

•Performance

• Drift

• Accuracy

• Resolution

• Long Term Performance etc…

• Metrology

•NACE / API etc. What can be adapted that already exists?

Define ‘Stages of Qualification’

•ISO standards, what can be adapted to meet our standard?

•What do the Operators want to see?

Earlier discussions mentioned ‘Building Blocks’, for those of you that have recollection of this, please expand.

Develop a Standard way of reporting Metrology and Performance indicators

Define Failure Modes

Work Group

Feedback

39

Update

1. Confirmation of title and definition (for now)

2. Quick summary of what you discussed

3. Any queries for the steering committee

40

Working Group

Development

41

Feedback and

Actions for Next

Quarter

42

WG Feedback

• Dates for next telcon?

• Frequency (quarterly, monthly etc)

• Actions

• Delegation of responsibilities

43

Group

Long Term Plans

44

Long Terms Plans

• JIPs

• Understand downhole conditions

• Qualify subsea electrical feed through subsea systems

• Interest from: Statoil, Maersk, Eni, Weatherford, Schlumberger (Diamould), Teledyne (so far)

• Next Steps

45

Meeting Review

46

Agreed Actions

47

CCL

•To dig out existing qualification tests:

•Impact Testing – Graeme and Ed Laffitte

•Abrasion – Jesse Cochrane, MSCL

•Compatibility – Ram, SLB

OHZI

•Rough draft due by 3pm GMT 28th Feb

•All to get copies of ISO 144998 & template

•Master Doc owner – Sean

•Tech Specs – Odd Geir

•Supplier Manu Perf – led by Matthew Crumpe

•Appendix of Packer Types – Justin Bowerstock

Gauges

•TOC available for review by 17-25th Feb

•ISO Template – Bruce Scott / ACH

•Draft TOC – Terje & Dean

Next WG Telcons

48

Working Groups (dates for web conferences)

• CCL • OHZI • Downhole electronics

Steering Committee Meetings 2012

SIIS / SEAFOM (24 – 28 September)

Q3 - September:

Hyatt Regency Hotel,

1 Ave De Lafayette, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Phone: +1 617 912 1234. Fax: +1 617 451 2198.

Website: www.regencyboston.hyatt.com

Q4 – (4 – 7th December):

Victoria Park Plaza Hotel,

Damrak 1-5, Amsterdam 1012 LG, The

Netherlands.

Phone: +31 (0) 20 62 34, Fax: +31 (0) 20 62 52

997.

Website:

http://www.parkplaza.com/amsterdamnl_victoria

49

Q2

8/9th May 2012 (Tue after OTC?)

8am start Tue - Wed lunch

Weatherford, Houston

Any other volunteers to host?

http://www.regencyboston.hyatt.com/�

http://www.parkplaza.com/amsterdamnl_victoria�

Any Other Business

50

• Declaration of interest from guests • Any other suggested contacts that OTM should approach?

• SEAFOM Industry Event

Thank you

For further information, please contact :

Annie Hairsine

Associate Director

OTM Consulting Ltd

E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: +44 1483 598000

www.otmnet.com


http://www.otmnet.com/�

http://www.otmnet.com/�

Back Up Slides

53

Working Groups – Definition

54

1. Cables, Control Lines & Connectors Pilot Group Hydraulic, electric & fibre optic lines Inclusion of fluids?

2. Open Hole Zonal Isolation Pilot Group

3. Downhole Conditions JIP Conditions faced in installation, start up and operation Inclusion of accelerated life testing?

Group structure

55

Similar in format to SIIS, SEAFOM, MDIS

Membership open to:

• Oil companies • Completion Vendors • Equipment Vendors

• One vote per member

Steering committee

• Responsible for overseeing the direction and development of AWES and advising OTM on technical matters

• Role mainly fulfilled during meetings (with preparatory telcon as required)

• One representative from each member group / pilot group


56


Baker

Graeme Young - [email protected] - Kevin Holmes - [email protected] (TBC) Roger Duncan - [email protected] (TBC)

Ed Wood - [email protected] Justin Bowersock - [email protected]

Gerald Whitley Jr - [email protected] -

BP

Mark Barrilleaux - [email protected] - +1 281 366 2486

Christine Cano - [email protected] BP

Chevron



Donald Lanceslin – SME Subsea/Completion Integration – [email protected] Scott Wagstaff – SME IWC & Completion Equipment – [email protected] Alfredo Acevedo – SME Artificial Lift Systems – [email protected]

ENI Franco Bottazi - [email protected] Carmen Repetto - [email protected]

Stephano Di Vincenzo - [email protected]

Expro (TBC) Simon Kelly (TBC)

Halliburton

Kirby Schrader - [email protected] - +1 281 297 1218

Ron Hinkie - [email protected]; Pete Smith - Easywell [[email protected]]

Bruce Scott - [email protected] - +1.972.418.2787 Matthew Scogin - [email protected]

Maersk Graham Edmonstone - Maersk Patrick Moran -

[email protected] Graham Edmonstone - Maersk Mid South

Control Lines

Jesse Cochran - [email protected] - +1 281 204 7355 - -

Nexen Grant Mackinlay - [email protected] Iain Coates - [email protected] Alex Malcolm - [email protected]

Packers Plus

(TBC) - Robert Coon (TBC) -


57


Petrobras




Read Well

Services (TBC) Read Well – Andy (TBC)

Roxar Roxar Roxar Michael Scott - [email protected] - +47 51 81 89 28

RSCC

Cliff Westwood - [email protected] - +1

860653 8338

Dustin Dulac - [email protected] - +1 860

653 8444 - -

RWE Stephan Schroeder - [email protected]

Krassimire Entchev Wolfgang Faist - [email protected] -

+49 40 6375-2592 RWE

Schlumberger

Ramaswamy Meyyappan - [email protected] Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Stephen Pride - [email protected] - +47 51944810 Ashish Chaudhary - [email protected] Lee Jackson - [email protected]

Statoil Lars Vinje - [email protected] Odd Geir Svela - [email protected] Stein Are Albertsen - [email protected] - +1 832 485 3662

TAM

International

Tim Davis - [email protected] - +1 713 292 1604 -

Teledyne (TBC) Allen Gould - [email protected] (TBC) - - Total (TBC) Sébastien Bourgoin (TBC)

Weatherford

Brian Drakeley - [email protected] Laffitte, Edward D - [email protected]

Sean Yakeley -

[email protected] Brian Davies - [email protected]

Dean Lehner - [email protected] -

+1.281.348.1033

Welltec Paul Hazel - [email protected]





58 - Classification: Internal 2011-09-19

Electrical feed-through subsea systems JIP outline


Background

• Reliability of downhole sensors in subsea wells needs to be improved

• One critical element is the cable routing, and connections, required to pass the conduit from the sea environment into the well (feed-through system)

• Current technology subcontracted by subsea companies. Sensor suppliers not participated when specifications and qualifications has been performed


JIP principle

• Objective; Qualify two feed-through systems with key technology to be used for both FMC and Aker horizontal trees

Establish project

Specifications and

requirements Tender Process Perform

Qualifications

• Gauge suppliers to participate in all stages of this process

AWES Pilot Group Cables, Control Lines, Connectors

Day 2 -2nd Half

Scope

• TEC = Tubing Encapsulated “Cable” • Electrical Cable Only

– Pass Mechanical Qualification Ideas to SEAFOM – Must be Armored with Metal Tube

• Hermetic – Will Included “Outer “ Encapsulation

• Qualification Testing and Minimum Manufacturing FAT Requirements

• No Design Standards

Pressure Testing

• Qualification Test for Pressure Rating • Test Vessel for Rated Pressure

– Cable Exits Both Ends • Collapse, Fluid Ingress, Electrical Short. ?TDR? • Sample Size (32) • Minimum Value • at Rated Temperature or De-rate based on Yield

Strength Reductions

Encapsulations • Purpose

– Impact Resistance – Abrasion Resistance – Crush Resistance – Identification – Increase Surface Area for Clamping Force – Vibration Isolation – Galvanic Corrosion Protection – Protect Tube Surface from Scratching – Minimize Spooling Units (Flatpacks) – Protect from Handling/Storage Damage

Encapsulations • Life Cycle

– Transportation/Storage before Install – Deployment (Run in Hole) – Installed/Operation – Retirement (Pulled Out of Hole) – Disposal – Recycle?

• Development of Life Cycle / Purpose Matrix – Important for Qualification Test Parameters

• Temperature/Pressure/Environment/Acceptance Criteria

Encapsulation - Testing • Impact Testing

– Define Failure Mode • Maximum Allowable Deformation?

– Flattening of Protected Tube » Absolute Value or Percentage of Initial Diameter?

• Electrical Failure – Short of Conductor to Tube?

– Define Impact Surface • Size of Impact Hammer Face (Length x Width) • Maximum Flat-pack Width Considerations (50MM?) • Hammer Weight Must be Defined

– Discussion of Acceptance Criteria • Successful History of Polypropylene Usage

– Use as Base Line for Comparison – Need Current Manufactures Data

Encapsulation - Testing

• Abrasion – Sharp Edge?

• Existing Cable Industry Tests (Mil Specs) – Rough Edge?

• Existing Cable Industry Tests (Mil Specs) – Tabor Abrasion Testing?? – Erosion Testing?? – Discussion of Acceptance Criteria

• Successful History of Polypropylene Usage – Use as Base Line for Comparison – Need Current Manufactures Data

Actions • Telecom/Web Meeting

– Wednesday, March 14, 2012 – 15:00 GMT

• RSCC / Cliff Westwood – Revise Current Draft Specification to Remove Design Aspects – Add TEC Diagram in Definitions – Investigate Pressure Test Fixture Designs for Pressure Qualifications

• Weatherford / Graeme Bedborough & Ed Laffitte – Develop Draft of Impact Test Qualification Procedure

• MSCL / Jessie Cochran – Investigate / Collect / Share Abrasion Testing Results

• Schlumberger / Ram Meyyappan – Get Authorization to Share SLB Cable Qualification Test Procedures/Processes

• Roxar/ Michael Scott – Get Authorization to Share Roxar Cable Specification and/or Qualification Test

Procedures/Processes

AWES Group Comments

• Will CCL Group Address Connectors?? – Concern with Hydraulic Connections – No Current Expertise on Current Committee with

Regards to Connectors • Electrical or Hydraulic

– Group Will Focus on TEC for Immediate Future

• Will CCL Group Address Gas Migration? – Gas Blocking/ Fluid Blocking – To Be Determined

AWES Group: Open Hole Zonal Isolation Tools

AWES Milan, Jan. 2012

AWES – OHZI Group (Review Houston) Definition of Equipment Scope • Any openhole isolation tools such as:

– Inflatable open hole packer – Swellable open hole packer – Mechanical open hole packer (different setting methods) – Expandable open hole tools – Other open hole isolation developments

• Not of Scope: – Plugs and packers (barrier tools) – Sleeves – Screens, gravel packs – Etc.

AWES – OHZI Group (Review Houston) Standard Gaps • Barrier to be excluded (ISO 14310) • Empirical Equations (Model) to be checked

– Formation stress (rock mechanics) – Scaling of rating and load cases

• Standardized testing to get input to model and generate envelope – On elements (including long term test?) – On entire system – Run-in well test???

• Qualification and functionality matrix to be set-up • Review elastomer standards • Review industry quality standards

AWES – OHZI Group Open Hole Conditions • Hole Conditions

– Type (Matrix to be developed; could be different for each packer type) agree on test procedure

– Roughness (rock; casing) – Hole Shape (ovality, wash-outs) – Rock character (permeabiliy, etc.)

• Test on Hole Types – Standard test (centered; nominal) = Tier 1a – Extended test (eccentric, ovality) bigger hole size =

Tier 1b (10% or 15%???) Correlation to provide Tier 1b, 2b, 3a, 3c

AWES – OHZI Group Rock Mechanics • Rock vs. OHZI interface

– Mechanical – Rock characteristics (perm., etc.)

• Strain Gauge – Forces measured in casing – Compare with rock strength (core sample)

AWES – OHZI Group Test Results / Parameters • Envelope

– Parameter to be defined (p,T, axial, extension) depending on level of testing

– Anchor forces (14310 test); swellable may have 0 as those slip

• Test Parameters – p,T according to ISO envelope – 2 shapes (ideal, big hole) see slide before – Leak rate (liquid) – Standard fluid (swellable) – e.g. salt/fresh water and

base oil (environmental friendly)

AWES – OHZI Group Test Requirements • Annex A- Validation test requirements

– Liquid test at constant temperature – Liquid test plus axial load and constant

temperature – Liquid test at variable temperature – Liquid test plus axial load variable temperature

• Annex B – Radial test requirements – Triaxial load (radial load) – No radial load for swellable or inflatable

AWES – OHZI Group Standard Document (ISO) • Norm

– Cross reference to existing standards – Document might be based on ISO-14998 – Quality (Q1-Q3) stated in ISO-14998 as well as

shipping update might be necessary

• Manufacturer Tests – e.g. max expansion factor (process and test of

Norm needs to be applied)

AWES – OHZI Group Work Packages • Prepare Template for Standard Document

– send the document prior next teleconference (TC) {Sean} • Technical Specification

– Operators (Sec. 6) draft prior next TC2 {Odd} • Matrix

– Prepare the (V-iv to V-III); draft prior next TC2 {Wolfgang} • Supplier Section

– Service (Sec. 7); draft pior next TC2 {Justin} • Annex A

– Draft prior next TC2 {Matthew}

AWES – OHZI Group Meetings • Teleconferences

– TC 2: Feb. 28th – 8am (Houston time) / 3pm MEZ – TC 3: late March / early April

• AWES Steering Committee Meeting – May 8th-9th; Houston (after OTC)

AWES 2012 - GAUGES – January 26 Objectives

1. Define ‘Downhole Electronics’ or ‘Downhole Sensing’ or combine 1. What equipment is covered under the standard 2. Included & Not Included

2. Outline ‘Acceptance Criteria’ and HOW Testing is conducted. 1. Reporting of results is to be standardized so comparison can be made efficiently.

3. Performance Minimums Functionality Performance

Drift Accuracy Resolution Long Term Performance etc…

4. Metrology 1. NACE / API etc. What can be adapted that already exists?

5. Define ‘Stages of Qualification’ 1. ISO standards, what can be adapted to meet our standard?

6. What do the Operators want to see?

7. Building Blocks – Work Group Discussion Point

8. Develop a Standard way of reporting Metrology and Performance Indicators

9. Define Failure Modes

Downhole Sensing - AWES 2012 – January 26 Objectives

• What is Included / Not Included • What is the title of the Work Group • Concentrate on Qualification Procedural

Standard generation, as to not create specifics that force application/product definitions

• Follow the prescribed Framework for Best Practice Guideline / Recommended Practice

WG3 Breakout session – Jan 26th Milan

• Naming convention for Work Group: - Work Group name

• Downhole Electronics

GAUGES

Included

• ***Gauges – Sensing – Sensing to be concentrated on first to put through

the Best Practices Guidelines process.

• Later / Second iteration - Electric Subsurface Safety Valve - Control

• Later / Second iteration - Electric Downhole control module – Control

• Later / Second iteration - Flow Sensing

Operators • What do you want to see land on your desk?

– Class type system to choose from; Class A, B, C… • All gauges/sensing (Exclude Fiber –see point below), pressure ranges – temperature ranges

– Classes to capture; • Class c permanent– pressure, temperature, accuracy, res, drift, Vibration, Shock, life • Class b permanent – pressure, temperature, acc, res, drift • Class a semi-permanent – Pressure, Temperature – res , accuracy

– Reporting is how parameter is qualified not what the limit is to be • UUTs sample size to be defined for such tests as Life where results for all UUTs are reported- need to review what UUT

sample size – Need to have definitions of HALT and LIFE tests to determine how LIFE test is performed

• Outside/Inside reliability engineer input, outside test labs, other industries – Qualification on Transducer, Electronics, Cable Head (Connector) in standard.

• Splices, Hanger feed-thru to be considered for next iteration – Is SeaFom addressing Hybrid connector? Where is this captured?

• Need to discuss with SeaFom about what their standard encompasses and if the same parts/pieces can be addressed in this Standard?

• Need to have discussion with SeaFom to determine what they have actually done!!!! – On-site / Installation of interfaces QA - QC – Connectors (Cable Head), – QA/QC Gauge to mandrel Interface – Pressure testability, Qualification of seals…….. Discussion point for

when to be included!!!! – Concern with testing of Cable Head (Cable Connector to Gauge) being tested independently of Gauge for

Qualification? Is Gauge qualified with Cable Head Connector attached to gauge or not????

Performance Reporting

• Apples to Apples technical comparison – Units, life determination, temperature, pressure,

Shock, combination of Environmental stresses**, stability, resolution, accuracy,

– Test equipment standards, performance – Electronic and Fiber – AWES and SeaFom

Vendor differences identified by Operator

• Concern with testing of Cable Head (Cable Connector to Gauge) being tested independently of Gauge for Qualification? Is Gauge qualified with Cable Head Connector attached to gauge or not???? • Discussion to include Cable Head (Connector), electronics,

transducer

Definitions??? Is this needed?

• Terms to be standardized – ESS

• Vibration • Shock

– HALT – Life – Accuracy – Resolution – ….......

Additional Topics

• SIS – Subsea Interface Standard – Replacing IWIS

SeaFom • Cable, Connectors, splices, feed-throughs, tree connectors-wet

mate, dry mate at gauge – All Addressed or to be addressed within SEAFOM

• Pressure/Temperature gauges are addressed • Actual Documents for SEAFOM members only. Non-members can’t

access – working arrangement to be defined • Hybrid cables, Hybrid connectors not addressed in SEAFOM • SEAFOM didn’t address UUT qty. Minimum requirement is for

example 1 connector set. • SEAFOM has nothing yet ready for ISO submission – Today is an RP

(SEAFOM Recommended Practice) • Gap comparison of AWES and SEAFOM – we could share draft

standards for this comparison at a later date.

Action Items as of Jan 26th • Table of Contents

– 3-4 weeks for generation – Feb 17th-Feb 25th – 2-3 weeks for group member review – March 8th for

Webex/conference • Annie/Bruce Scott – Contact ISO for Template • Terje Baustad / Dean Lehner to populate draft Table of

Contents using headings as template per 13628 pt 6 • SCOPE Draft – Discussion ongoing

• Qualification and Testing, QA/QC (still need to qualify what this is??) – Documentation traceability requirements etc…, FAT

• Discussion Point – Documentation requirements/MTR requirements – can we specify in the standard, is this realistic?

– Can this be discussed in the next AWES Chair meeting – Should be caution regarding inclusion of this in the standard – Personal

comment (Dean)

Document – tracking changes

• Master document to be circulated – Iain Coates to send a sample file indicating method of tracking to keep be able to maintain sanity

AWES Minutes - Q1 2012 Actions Summary Attendees

Documents

Transcript of AWES Minutes - Q1 2012 Actions Summary Attendees