Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Transcript of Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Contents presentation
•Speed and crashes•Theory behind enforcement•Estimated accident reduction•Speed enforcement in the Netherlands
•Camera systems in the Netherlands•Implementation•Conclusions
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Speed and crashes
• 33% of fatal crashes is (partly) caused by excessive or inappropriate speed (OECD/ECMT, 2006).
• driving 5 km/hour faster than speed limit doubles crash risk; exceeding the speed limit by 10 km/hour quadruples crash risk rate and by 15 km/hour increases crash risk more than ten times (Kloeden, 1997).
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Theory behind police enforcementTheory of deterrence
Improving safetyImproving safety Other external influences:?infrastructure design?behaviour of others?vehicle characteristics?rule characteristics?driver training?societal trend?incidental fluctuations
Other external influences:?infrastructure design?behaviour of others?vehicle characteristics?rule characteristics?driver training?societal trend?incidental fluctuations
Deterring rule violation: general and
specific
Deterring rule violation: general and
specific
Subjective probability of getting caught
Subjective probability of getting caught
Objective probability of getting caught / enforcement pressure
Objective probability of getting caught / enforcement pressure
Enforcement activitiesEnforcement activities
LegislationLegislation Terms of reference / activity programme
Terms of reference / activity programme
Influence of effect of measure:?co-operation judicial
and administrative sectors?communication with citizen?traffic area
characteristics?et cetera
Influence of effect of measure:?co-operation judicial
and administrative sectors?communication with citizen?traffic area
characteristics?et cetera
Improving safetyImproving safety Other external influences:?infrastructure design?behaviour of others?vehicle characteristics?rule characteristics?driver training?societal trend?incidental fluctuations
Other external influences:-infrastructure design-behaviour of others-vehicle characteristics-rule characteristics-driver training-societal trend-incidental fluctuations
Deterring rule violation: general and
specific
Deterring rule violation: general and
specific
Subjective probability of getting caught
Subjective probability of getting caught
Objective probability of getting caught / enforcement pressure
Objective probability of getting caught / enforcement pressure
Enforcement activitiesEnforcement activities
LegislationLegislation Terms of reference / activity programme
Terms of reference / activity programme
Influence of effect of measure:?co-operation judicial
and administrative sectors?communication with citizen?traffic area
characteristics?et cetera
Influence of effect of measure:- co-operation
judicial and adminstrative
- communication with citizen- traffic area characteristics - road characteristics
sector
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Estimated accident reduction speed checks. Meta-analysis PEPPER (2008)
Practice Accident reduction
95% confidence interval
Speed cameras -34% -27; -41Stationary controls with separate team for stopping offenders
-26% -22; -29
Composite controls -8% +5; -19Moving patrol with marked car
-6% +4; -16
Radar laser: same car detects and apprehends
-1% +3; -5
Overall -18% -13; -23
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Police enforcement in Netherlands
• Policy resorts under Ministry of Safety and Justice
• 25 police regions• >40.000 police officers• Traffic enforcement is one of basic policing tasks• Special motorway police (KLPD)• In each region special traffic enforcement teams (25-27 persons) focuses on 5 spearheads of enforcement: 1. speed, 2. alcohol, 3. seat belt,
4. red light negation, 5. helmet use
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Four main methods of speed enforcement in the Netherlands: •automatic speed checks using fixed or mobile speed cameras, not apprehending offenders; •mobile speed checks with apprehending offenders; •mobile surveillances and apprehending speed offenders; •average speed checks in which the average speed of all passing vehicles along a particular road section is determined (also known as section controls).
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Automated enforcement in the Netherlands 2011
Devices Number
Digital speed cameras 180
Analog speed cameras 400
Red light/speed cameras
600
Section control systems
11
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Implementation issues camera enforcement
• Political support on highest levels• Clear management and accountability• Enforcement plan (strategic, tactical, operational)
• Choice of camera locations based on clear criteria• Pilot testing• Communication/publicity• Efficient fast processing of traffic violations• Fast and fair penalties• Evaluation of speed and crash effects at camera sites on a regular basis
Charles GoldenbeldJuly 2nd 2012, Leidschendam
Automated speed enforcement in the Netherlands
Conclusions automated speed enforcement
• Strong but – in time and space - limited speed and crash effects of camera enforcement
• Importance of good choice of camera locations
• Importance of the use of (local) publicity as support measure
• Good planning & management needed