Ariel D.T. 2014. The Coins from Area J. In H. Geva. Jewish Quarter Excavations in the Old City of...
-
Upload
antiquities -
Category
Documents
-
view
6 -
download
0
Transcript of Ariel D.T. 2014. The Coins from Area J. In H. Geva. Jewish Quarter Excavations in the Old City of...
JEWISH QUARTEREXCAVATIONS
IN THE OLD CITY OF JERUSALEMconducted by Nahman Avigad, 1969–1982
Volume VI: Areas J, N, Z and Other StudiesFINAL REPORT
Hillel Geva
With contributions by:D.T. Ariel, M. Avissar, D. Ben-Shlomo, A. Berman, N. Brosh, G. Finkielsztejn,
M. Hershkovitz, Y. Israeli, J. Magness, H.K. Mienis, R. Nenner-Soriano,Y. Rapuano, R. Rosenthal-Heginbottom, O. Sion, I. Yezerski
ISRAEL EXPLORATION SOCIETYINSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY, HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
JERUSALEM 2014
CHAPTER EIGHT (A)
COINS FROM AREA J
Donald T. Ariel
Area J yielded 551 coins, all bronze or copper-
alloy, of which 298 were identifiable (Ariel
Berman identified No. 298). An index of the coins
according to locus appears in Table 8(A).1.
The high percentage of unidentifiable coins
derives from the fact that not all the material under-
went laboratory cleaning. Of the 253 unidentifiable
coins, only 25 were cleaned. The decision to
reduce the number of coins to be cleaned derived
from the very high proportion of “probably
Jannaeus” and “possibly Jannaeus” coins dis-
cerned in Area E (Ariel 2006: 192), and prelimi-
nary examination of the Area J coins (not yet
cleaned), which suggested that the overwhelming
majority were, based upon considerations of
fabric, also likely to be “probably Jannaeus” or
“possibly Jannaeus”. This decision corresponds
with the policy adopted in this volume to present
only selected finds, owing to the extensive publica-
tion of very similar finds from other areas in the
Jewish Quarter (e.g., adjacent Area E and nearby
Area B). As a result, in the following report of Area
J, only 118 of the “probably Jannaeus” and “possi-
bly Jannaeus” coins are presented, instead of well
over 300 such coins that were probably found
there. This selectivity applies to the coin finds from
Area N as well (Chapter Eight (B)). As with the
rest of this volume, readers are encouraged to refer
to the already published coin reports of Areas E
and B (Ariel 2006; 2010).
No coins were found in contexts of Stratum 5
(Hellenistic–Hasmonean; late 3rd–2nd centuries
BCE). This stratum is represented by one, or possi-
bly two, cisterns (L.1373, L.1380), although the
association of L.1373 to the stratum is tentative, as
this cistern was filled with debris of Stratum 4 (see
Chapter One (A)). Elsewhere in Area J, only one
coin dates to the early period of Stratum 5, the 3rd
century BCE.1 It is a coin of Ptolemy III (No. 1,
246–222 BCE) that was found in a locus of Stra-
tum 3. In fact, this type has recently been
reattributed from Ptolemy II to Ptolemy III (Lorber
2007–2008: 20). From my experience, a signifi-
cant number of Ptolemaic coins in the southern
Levant are worn, suggesting that they circulated
for long periods (No. 1 is not worn). At sites where
these coins are found with no — or almost no —
earlier Ptolemaic coins, and with high numbers of
coins of Antiochus III and IV, it is likely that the
Ptolemy III coins arrived at the sites in the period
of Seleucid hegemony. This may apply here, and
possibly also to the three Ptolemaic coins found in
the adjacent Area E (Ariel 2006: 203, Nos. 1–3),
which were also not found in contexts of the 3rd–
2nd centuries. The suggestion that many Ptolemaic
coins are to be associated with contexts later than
the 3rd century BCE, if accepted, is noteworthy, as
the absence of coins in or relating to Stratum 5 par-
allels the near absence of coins in Stratum 8 at the
City of David,2 perhaps the only other context in
Jerusalem dating to the 3rd century BCE (De Groot
and Bernick-Greenberg 2012: 177).
The remains of Stratum 4 (Late Hasmonean–
Early Roman; 1st century BCE) include fragmen-
tary architecture and mostly fills, as intensive con-
struction in the subsequent Stratum 3 removed
most of the earlier stratum. The coin finds from
Stratum 4, besides the Ptolemy III coin (No. 1,
residual in Stratum 3) noted above, comprise one
Hasmonean coin of Hyrcanus I (No. 10) and 10 of
Jannaeus (or his successors; Nos. 65, 71, 77–78,
102, 115–116, 154, 182, 221). This compares to the
[ 243 ]
numismatic profile in Stratum 4 of adjacent Area
E, where the coins were predominantly
Hasmonean, most of them struck by Jannaeus (or
his successors), while others were early types of
Herod (Ariel 2006: Nos. 767, 787–788, 790), and
two were autonomous, 1st century BCE coins
(Ariel 2006: Nos. 809–810). The absence of coins
of Herod in Stratum 4 of Area J does not imply that
any change is necessary in the dating of the stratum
as a counterpart to the stratum of the same number
in Area E, as the ratios are roughly the same. In
Area E, four coins of Herod were found in Stratum
4 and 41 in Stratum 3 (Ariel 2006: 192, Table 8.2),
while in Area J the numbers are 0 and 13, respec-
tively; therefore, the absence of coins of Herod in
Stratum 4 of Area J is insignificant.
Despite the above-mentioned absence in Stratum
4, Herod’s coins nevertheless reflect the same high
numbers in the overall assemblage, relative to
other coin groups (Ariel and Fontanille 2012: 157),
as also evidenced in Area E and even in Area N,
although the numbers of coins in the last area are
altogether small. In Area J, as in Area E, a low per-
centage of coins of the anchor/double cornucopias
type (TJC, No. 59; Ariel and Fontanille 2012: 63,
Type 15) is seen (Nos. 278–279), relative to other
Herodian types, and a high percentage of the single
cornucopia/eagle type (TJC, No. 66; Ariel and
Fontanille 2012, Type 16). The other types of
Herodian coins in Area J are those considered ear-
lier than these two types. The only later type,
depicting anchor and galley (TJC, No. 65; Ariel
and Fontanille 2012, Type 17) is absent in Areas E,
J, B and N. In fact, the anchor/galley type appears
only once in Jerusalem, in nearby Area W of the
Jewish Quarter, north of Area J (Gitler 2003: 463,
No. 305).
The coins retrieved in Stratum 3 of Area J are
similar in profile to the same stratum in adjacent
Area E. I have briefly discussed these coins from
Stratum 3 in Area J, found in Miqweh L.1364 along
with a unique assemblage of glass-workshop
refuse (Israeli and Katsnelson 2006: 412). At that
time, the coins of Area J had not been fully pro-
cessed, so the numbers diverge significantly from
those in this final report.3 Nevertheless, the well-
identified coins are still to be associated with Alex-
ander Jannaeus (104–76 BCE; three are
Hasmonean coins whose rulers are of uncertain
identification), and the relative frequencies of the
various types have not changed (see Table 8A.1:
L.1359, L.1364, L.1366). In the previous discus-
sion, I concluded that the absence of coins of
Herod in the fill of the miqweh suggested that the
assemblage was unlikely to date to Herod’s reign.
Based upon this, Israeli and Katsnelson concluded
that the numismatic evidence indicated that the
assemblage “should be dated to the mid-1st cen-
tury BCE or even slightly earlier” (Israeli and
Katsnelson 2006: 412; italics mine). However, my
remarks would actually indicate a date up until
Herod struck his first coins in the summer of 37
BCE (Ariel and Fontanille 2012: 97).
The glass debitage was first dated by Avigad,
who proposed that the date of the assemblage fell
between 75 BCE (the abandonment of Tel Anafa)
and Herod’s reign, and although he knew that
Jannaeus coins “had a lengthy lifetime”, he sug-
gested a mid-1st century BCE date “to be on the
safe side” (Avigad 1983: 191). However, new sci-
entific research (employing Cu and Pb isotopic
analysis) has indicated that many of the Jannaeus
coins of the types in the assemblage were, in fact,
struck after the king’s death, “most likely between
67 and 40 BCE”, and (owing to historical consider-
ations) possibly even between 63 and 43 BCE
(Bower et al. 2012). While the excavators concur
that the ceramics in the fill of Miqweh L.1364 are
slightly earlier than the rest of Stratum 3, neverthe-
less, considering (1) the above suggestion that the
assemblage could date as late as 37 BCE, (2) the
dating in general of Stratum 3 in Area E to within
Herod’s reign (based upon a variety of chronologi-
cal indicators), and (3) the fact that coins in
Miqweh L.1364 played a critical role in dating it,
the assemblage of glass-workshop refuse could, in
my opinion, also date slightly later than the mid-
1st century BCE.4 Of course, this slight change
does not diminish in the slightest, the importance
of the glass assemblage as the earliest evidence for
glass-blowing, prior to the appearance of that tech-
nique in Rome (Gorin-Rosen 2006: 257).
Very few coins date later than the laying of the
Herodian Pavement 1600 in Stratum 2, roughly
dated to the end of the 1st century BCE (Herod’s
reign). This small number of coins from Stratum 2
[ 244 ]
D O N A L D T . A R I E L
is probably due to the fact that the upper layers
above the pavement were removed by mechanical
equipment (see Chapter One (A)). Three coins
(Nos. 293–295; 67/8 CE) of the Jewish War were
found in L.1320, defined as Strata 3 or 2, although
they must be associated with material deposited
after the laying of the Herodian pavement (Stratum
1b). These coins join the 45 Jewish War coins from
Area B (Ariel 2010: 242–243, Nos. 51–95), the
eight coins from Area E (Ariel 2006: 211–212,
Nos. 819–826), and the four coins from Area N
(Chapter Eight (B), Nos. 19–22), evidence of the
destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE.
An autonomous bronze of Dora struck in 64/5
CE (No. 292), also derives from L.1320, in the
same context as the Jewish War coins. One may
ask (as I did in 2010, see Ariel 2010:237), if such a
coin circulated in Jerusalem before and during the
Jewish War, or if it was deposited here only at the
time of the city’s destruction. This coin may have
arrived in the Jewish Quarter with one of the city’s
Roman besiegers. Two other Dora coins, dating
three and four years later than No. 292, have been
excavated in Jerusalem, one in the northerly Area
A of the Jewish Quarter excavations (68/9 CE;
Gitler 2003: 465, No. 355) and the second in the
Southern Wall excavations (67/8 CE; Meshorer,
unpublished manuscript, No. 117). Another coin of
Dora, apparently dating to 66/7 CE, was found in a
small purse(?) hoard at Tell el-Ful, probably to be
associated with a besieger (Bijovsky 2007: 71, n.
7; Ariel, Barukh and Zilberbod, forthcoming).
[ 245 ]
C H A P T E R E I G H T ( A ) : C O I N S F R O M A R E A J
Table 8(A).1 Area J, index of coin identifications according to locus
Locus (Str.) Qty. Minting Authority Notes (TJC No., mint if known andnot Jerusalem)
LocusTotal
1301 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L8 3
1 Hasmonean (129–76 BCE) C or J
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 66
1303 (Str. 3) 1 Antiochus VII (132/1–131/0 BCE) 73a 3
1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L8
1 Unidentifiable
1306 (Str. 4) 1 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K 1
1307 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L8, L7–14 4
2 Unidentifiable
1308 (Str. 2) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L8 9
1 Hasmonean
1 Unstruck flan
6 Unidentifiable
1309 (Str. 1b) 1 Herod (37 BCE) 44 15
3 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14
11 Unidentifiable
[ 246 ]
D O N A L D T . A R I E L
Locus (Str.) Qty. Minting Authority Notes (TJC No., mint if known andnot Jerusalem)
LocusTotal
1310 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6 42
32 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L8
2 Unstruck flans
1 Agrippa I (41/42) 120
6 Unidentifiable
1312 (Str. 3) 1 Unstruck flan 1
1314 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L7–14 2
1315 (Str. 3) 1 Herod (37 BCE) 44 1
1317 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6 31
7 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 59
1 Procurator under Nero (58/9 CE) 345
21 Unidentifiable
1318 (Str. 1b) 1 Hyrcanus I (129–105 BCE) B 1
1319 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14 1
1320 (Str. 3–2) 1 Ptolemy III (246–222 BCE) Tyre 12
1 Hyrcanus I (129–105 BCE) B
3 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L9, L7–14
1 Herod (ca. 27–24 BCE) 60
1 Procurator under Nero (58/9 CE) 345
3 Jewish War (67/8 CE) 196
1 Autonomous (64/5 CE) Dora
1 Unidentifiable
1325 (Str. 1) 1 Shaªban II (1363–1377 CE) ¡alab 29
28 Unidentifiable
1329 (Str. 3–2) 1 Seleucid or Autonomous (222–98 BCE) 11
1 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K
2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L9, L7–14
1 Herod (ca. 27–24 BCE) 61
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 66
1 Agrippa I (41/42) 120
4 Unidentifiable
[ 247 ]
C H A P T E R E I G H T ( A ) : C O I N S F R O M A R E A J
Locus (Str.) Qty. Minting Authority Notes (TJC No., mint if known andnot Jerusalem)
LocusTotal
1331 (Str. 1b) 2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7 5
1 Roman provincial (2nd–3rd ca. CE)
2 Unidentifiable
1333 (Str. 1b) 2 Unidentifiable 2
1338 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14 7
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 66
4 Unidentifiable
1339 (Str. 3) 1 Seleucid (2nd ca. CE?) 9
4 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L8, L7–14
4 Unidentifiable
1340 (Str. 2) 1 Procurator under Nero? (58/9 CE?) 345 1
1341 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K 2
1 Unidentifiable
1342 (Str. 3) 1 Hasmonean 1
1344 (Str. 3) 1 Unidentifiable 1
1346 (Str. 3) 1 Hasmonean? 2
1 Unidentifiable
1350 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6 4
2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L7–14
1 Unidentifiable
1352 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L 3
1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14
1 Unidentifiable
1353 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K 51
19 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L9, L10, L7–14
1 Unstruck flan
1 Herod (ca. 27–24 BCE) 62
3 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 66
1 Herod 54
1 Byzantine (6th ca. CE)
23 Unidentifiable
[ 248 ]
D O N A L D T . A R I E L
Locus (Str.) Qty. Minting Authority Notes (TJC No., mint if known andnot Jerusalem)
LocusTotal
1355 (Str. 4) 3 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L9, L7–14 10
7 Unidentifiable
1357 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K 16
4 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L7–14
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 59
10 Unidentifiable
1358 (Str. 3) 1 Proto-Nabatean (3rd. ca. BCE) 45
1 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K
2 Jannaeus (104–76 BCE) L1–7
14 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L9, L14, L7–14
1 Hasmonean
2 Herod (ca. 27–24 BCE) 61
1 Herod (ca. 24–12 BCE) 59
23 Unidentifiable
1359 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (104–76 BCE) P 100
2 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K
3 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6
71 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L7–8, L8, L9, L10, L7–14
2 Hasmonean
20 Unidentifiable
1363 (Str. 3) 2 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14 5
3 Unidentifiable
1364 (Str. 3) 6 Jannaeus (104–80/79 BCE) K 24
1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6
13 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L8, L9, L7–14
1 Hasmonean
3 Unidentifiable
1366 (Str. 3) 3 Jannaeus (104–76 BCE) K–L, T 24
1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L6
10 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L9, L7–14
3 Hasmonean
7 Unidentifiable
Catalogue of Coins from Area J
The catalogue is organized chronologically. Asterisked coins appear in Plate 8(A).1.
See following pages
[ 249 ]
C H A P T E R E I G H T ( A ) : C O I N S F R O M A R E A J
Locus (Str.) Qty. Minting Authority Notes (TJC No., mint if known andnot Jerusalem)
LocusTotal
1369a (Str. 4) 1 Hyrcanus I (129–105 BCE) D 9
7 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7, L9, L7–14
1 Unidentifiable
1373 (Str. 3) 17 Unidentifiable 17
1375 (Str. 3) 1 Unidentifiable 1
1379 (Str. 3) 20 Unidentifiable 20
1380 (Str. 3) 1 Antiochus III (198–187 BCE) ªAkko-Ptolemais 6
5 Unidentifiable
W1619 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7–14 1
W1638 (Str. 3) 1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE and later) L7 1
Unstratified 1 Seleucid (173/2–150 BCE?) ªAkko-Ptolemais? 18
1 Jannaeus (80/79 BCE) L1–6
16 Unidentifiable
TOTAL 551
NOTES
1 The proto-Nabatean coin (No. 7) belongs to an
often-overstruck type recently assigned to a mint in
Philadelphia (Amman; Lorber, forthcoming,
B342). According to Catharine C. Lorber (pers.
comm.), the undertype never has central cavities,
suggesting that the type dates to before 261/0 BCE.
Consequently, Barkay (2011) recently redated the
coin type from Meshorer’s date of ca. 110–96 BCE
and possibly later (Meshorer 1975: 10–11, 85, Nos.
1–2), and her own redating to “long before 110
B.C.” (Barkay 2003–2006: 55), to the 3rd century
BCE. If this date is correct, then the Ptolemy III
coin (No. 1) is not the only 3rd century BCE coin
from Area J. However, I have not included the coin
in this discussion because this coin, like many
others of the type, is heavily worn (Barkay 2003–
2006: 55) and one may therefore maintain that it
arrived in Jerusalem well after being minted.
2 Although not noted in the final report (De Groot
and Bernick-Greenberg 2012), one coin was found
in the City of David Stratum 8 (Ariel 1990: 101,
C23). While the coin is illegible, a date in the 2nd
century CE was proposed (Ariel 1990), based upon
fabric. However, the 3rd-century-BCE ceramic
dating of Stratum 8 suggests that this dating is unre-
liable.
3 100 coins are noted by Israeli and Katsnelson
(2006: 411), while I reported on 40 (2006: 412).
The two superimposed loci (L.1359 and L.1364) in
Miqweh L.1364 contained a total of 124 coins, 23
unidentifiable.
4 In fact, as the coins of Herod’s third year are rare rel-
ative to the king’s later issues, it is also possible that
the assemblage of glass debitage dates up to 30 BCE,
when the larger striking of Herod’s undated coins
commenced (Ariel and Fontanille 2012: 178–179).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography for Chapters Eight (A) and Eight (B) appears at the end of Chapter Eight (B).
[ 257 ]
C H A P T E R E I G H T ( A ) : C O I N S F R O M A R E A J
Plate 8(A).1 Area J, coins