Christian and Biblical Online Education at the University of Balamand in Lebanon.
Apologetics and Christian Education
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Apologetics and Christian Education
LUTHER RICE SEMINARY
APOLOGETICS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
A PROJECT SUBMITTED TODR. BRUCE KREUTZER
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTSFOR
CM 530EDUCATIONAL MINISTRIES
BYROBERT HOWELL
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . 1
PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE DECLINE IN CHURCH ATTENDANCE. 2
SOLUTIONS TO ADDRESS AND CHANGE THE PROBLEM. . . 4
SUGGESTIONS FOR THE YOUTH MINISTER AND CHRISTIAN EDUCATOR 9
SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . 12
iv
INTRODUCTION
In a book published in 2009, authors Ken Ham and Britt
Beemer attempt to raise awareness to the increasing
“epidemic” of young adults leaving the church.1 In a study
conducted by Barna, it was observed that 61% of young adults
“had ben churched at one point during their teen years but
they are now spiritually disengaged.”2 Though there are many
reasons for these droves of individuals leaving the church,
there are many related to an apologetical nature. That is,
it relates to the defense of the faith, a reasoning of the
faith.3 One of the greatest needs for Christian education
(as this relates directly to the ages of those leaving the
Church) is for an apologetic defense of why Christianity is
the truth. Dr. Markos sums this up when he writes
Following in the tradition of Socrates and Peter, the modern Christian apologist neither apologizes for his beliefs nor relies solely on emotion when confronting
1 Ken Ham, and C. Britt Beemer, Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will QuitChurch and What You Can Do to Stop It (Green Forest, Ark.: Master Books, 2009), 19.2 Ibid.3 Louis Markos, Apologetics for the Twenty-first Century (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2010), 17-18.
1
those who consider his divine calling to be false or fanatical, delusional or dangerous. Instead he presents—boldly but not harshly—a defense of Christianity that squares with reason, logic, and human experience.4
The problem today within Christian education is that
ministers and educators have failed to teach the next
generation the truth of the truth. By this it is meant the
provable aspects of the Christian faith. Continuing on with
the results of the study, Ham and Beemer note, “39.8% first
had doubts [of the Christian faith] in middle school, 43.7%
first had their doubts in high school, and 10.6% had their
first doubts during college.”5 Combining to the two
percentages of middle and high school, one is left with a
shocking total. Almost half of students in high school have
doubts about their faith. And more than a third in middle
school have doubts. These figures are stunning, and it sheds
a light on a glaring problem in Christian schools, churches,
and youth groups.
PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE DECLINE OF CHURCH ATTENDANCE
4 Ibid., 17.5 Ham and Beemer, 32.
2
There is an explanation, though painful it may be for
Christians to hear, that will help in understanding the
reason behind the problem and the necessary changes to
reverse it. One of the questions asked of this group of
people was, “Did you often attend Sunday school?”6 61%
answered in the affirmative, and from this several
interesting facts were gathered.7 Several of these relate to
the reasoning of the faith. For example, they are “more
likely not to believe that all the accounts/stories in the
Bible are true/accurate”.8 Along the same lines they are
“more likely to doubt the Bible because it was written by
men” and “more likely to doubt the Bible because it was not
translated correctly.”9 This should be incredibly
surprising, and Ham and Beemer note their surprise when they
write, “This was our most stunning and disconcerting result
of the entire survey.”10
6 Ibid., 38.7 For the full list, see Ham and Beemer, 39.8 Ibid.9 Ibid.10 Ibid., 40.
3
There are several effects to note regarding the
failures in churches and schools. Perhaps the primary reason
is that teachers and ministers are failing to teach the
logical cohesion, historically reliability, and factual
trustworthiness of biblical truth. Dr. Markos presents a
well-stated summary of this when he writes, “As a direct
result of this shift, the traditional doctrinal claims of
Christianity have been removed from the realm of objective
truth and deposited in that of subjective feeling, causing
an artificial rupture to form between empirical ‘facts’ and
spiritual ‘values’.”11 So the youth in churches and
Christian schools have been trained and taught to
distinguish between facts and the Bible.
Another problem that has arisen is “an image
problem”.12 This was another study conducted by Barna and
Kinnaman. In this research the authors find “outsiders’ most
common reaction to the faith: they think Christians no
longer represent what Jesus had in mind, that Christianity 11 Markos, 22.12 David Kinnaman,, and Gabe Lyons, Unchristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity-- and Why It Matters. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 2007), 9.
4
in our society is not what it was meant to be.”13
Christianity has fallen into ill-repute. For reasons that
span the scope of the current discussion, the total of those
aspects will not be examined in their fullest. However,
several facts will aid in the understanding of the failure
of the church and Christian school and will enable a
progression to be made.
Unfortunately, 49% of those interviewed had a bad
impression of evangelical Christians.14 One of the reasons
for this is, as they note, “Evangelicals were often thought
to be Christians who are political activists.”15 Another
reason is the way evangelicals conduct themselves.16
Perhaps the most eye-opening aspect of their study was
the three common perceptions of Christianity. These are
“anti-homosexual,” “judgmental,” and “hypocritical”.17 The
authors spend the remainder of the book developing these 13 Kinnaman and Lyons, 13.14 Ibid., 23. The ages ranged from 16-29. These are primarilythe ages being discussed in this paper.15 Ibid., 23-24.16 Kinnaman and Lyons write, “What they react negatively to is our “swagger,” how we go about things and the sense of self-importance we project.” Ibid., 24.17 Ibid., 25.
5
ideas and others in order to illustrate that a character
development progress is necessary for Christianity. The
reason this is important, and its relationship to the
current discussion, is that the same age group surveyed in
Ham and Beemer’s study is the same group in Kinnaman and
Lyons’. This is, again, shocking information. This means
that Christian educators have not only failed to present the
facts of Christianity and their relation to the sciences, it
also means that they have failed to represent it as
authentic faith in Jesus Christ. Mahatma Gandhi once said,
“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your
Christians are so unlike your Christ.”18 This quote
represents the world’s view of Christianity, and the young
people of today do not want to be associated with such a
Christianity.
SOLUTIONS TO ADDRESS AND CHANGE THE PROBLEM
18 Mahatma Gandhi, "A Quote by Mahatma Gandhi." Goodreads. Accessed March 16, 2015. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/22155-i-like-your-christ-i-do-not-like-your-christians.
6
The Church is not without hope. Although the situation
is dire, and should be treated as a life or death situation,
it is not unchangeable. In both of the studies conducted by
the four authors solutions are offered. The first problem
presented is that of unbelief. While the middle school and
high school teenagers attended church (61%) they failed to
believe basic facts about the Bible. There is one solution,
and one solution only: teach the validity of those beliefs.
Here is where apologetics comes into the scene, like a
knight in shining armor. It does not replace the truth, but
is the truth personified. As Augustine once quipped, “Truth
is like a lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose.
It will defend itself.”19 However, in the current culture it
is important to provide the reasons why Christians believe
what they believe. Dr. Markos adequately describes the
failure, “The faithful guarded their religious space and
left the academy, the public schools, the arts, the media,
and the government to all under the sway of secular
19 "Quotations." Diggerfortruth. March 2, 2012. Accessed March 16, 2015. https://diggerfortruth.wordpress.com/inspiring-quotations/.
7
humanism. In a sense they ‘cut a deal’: leave us our faith
and we will cede reason to you.”20 So Christians, both
ministers and educators, have been perfectly happy to allow
those entities to have reason while keeping faith. This has
led, at least in part, to the departure of students ranging
from the 6th grade to the 12th grade. Douglas Groothius
offers a solution, one that will enable many of those
students fleeing the church to say because of the truth,
writing,
The antidote to this conundrum is to defend Christianity’s core claims rationally in order to show that Christianity is indeed objectively true. But more than this, apologetics needs to demonstrate that Christian truth is winsome because it explains who we are and how we can flourish as creatures in this life and beyond, if we are reconciled to our Creator.21
Both problems, the failure to teach the truthfulness as
well as the failure to represent Christ are found in
Groothius’ solution. Youth ministers and Christian educators
must learn from his suggestions and implement them in their
ministry and education. The problems will be addressed in
the order they were examined.20 Markos, 22-23.21 Douglas R. Groothuis, Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case forBiblical Faith (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic ;, 2011), 25.
8
Christian educators and youth ministers, as well as
parents, must present the factual evidence for the faith.
While it is truth that “Now faith is the assurance of things
hoped for, the conviction of things not seen,” it does not
mean blind faith, without any care or concern for facts.22
One interesting point to keep in mind is brought out by
Vanhetloo, when he writes, “A basic distinction to have
clear concerning faith is the contrast between faith as a
faculty of man’s makeup (corresponding somewhat to
intellectual and emotional aspects) and faith as acceptance
and trust (involving the whole of man, intellect, emotion,
and will). It is the contrast of achieving or accepting.”23
These leaders in the school and church must take this
mindset and begin to make changes in their ministries and
class rooms. Concerning the trustworthiness of the
Scriptures, Dr. Markos writes, “One of the essential
components of ‘mere’ Christianity is a belief that the Bible
is divinely inspired and wholly trustworthy and holds 22 Hebrews 11.6 (ESV, 2001)23 Vanhetloo, Warren. "Fact or Faith?" Central Bible Quarterly 1, no. 3 (1958): 27-30. Accessed May 16, 2015. http://www.galaxie.com/.
9
authority in the church and in the life of the believer.”24
Rather than attempting to prove the inerrancy or plenary
inspiration, Dr. Markos, and Christian educators and
ministers alike, should “show the Bible to be reliable in its
account of Jewish and Christian history.”25 Why is this
important? Why should the youth minister or Christian
educator attempt to prove the reliability of the Bible?
Remember, in Ham and Beemer’s study, 61% of those who
regularly attended Sunday school did not believe the Bible
to be accurate (the historical aspect).26 That is more than
half of those who regularly attend Sunday school. So proving
the reliability would be incredibly beneficial to their
faith. Groothius notes the importance of edifying the faith
of the believer through apologetics, writing, “But
apologetics is offered not only in response to the doubts
and denials of non-Christians. It also fortifies believers
in their faith whether they are wrestling with doubts and
24 Markos, 145.25 Ibid., 146.26 Ham and Beemer, 38-39.
10
questions or simply seeking a deeper grounding for their
biblical beliefs.”27
So Dr. Markos spends an entire chapter presenting
evidence that provides the believer with factual truth. He
spends several pages developing the historical reliability
of the Bible. Interestingly he writes, “Despite continued
media and academic claims that the Bible is historically
suspect, the fact remains that every phase of Jewish history
—from the patriarchs to the exodus to the conquest of Canaan
to the united and divided Kingdoms of David and his heirs to
the exile and return—has yield artifacts and extrabibical
texts that square with the biblical accounts.”28 Fulfilled
prophecy and the reliability of textual transmission also
point to the factual basis of the Bible. Markos also
develops the historicity of Jesus, which serves as another
beam on the foundation of the reliability of the Word of
God.
Moving from the presentation of truth, what about the
representation of Christ? Why do so many non-believers have 27 Groothius, 25.28 Markos, 148.
11
such a low view of Christianity? And why are so many young
people leaving the church? The reasons have already been
noted. However, what can the Church and Christian schools do
to change this perception? As with the presentation of truth
and Ham and Beemer’s suggestions, Kinnaman and Lyons offer
several suggestions to help with the “’emotional appeal’
(subjective attractiveness)”.29 But for the sake of time and
space, only a few will be briefly mentioned.
To begin with, the main objective would be “changing
the perception.”30 If the world perceives Christians as
being anti-homosexual, judgmental, and hypocritical, it is
necessary to change this. The authors give a sobering
thought when they write, “When it comes to our interaction
with outsiders, we have to realize that our relationships,
our interactions with people, comprise the picture of Jesus
that people retain.”31 So it would be sinful, to say the
least, to not change those perceptions. Jesus dealt with
sin, and this can no honest Christian deny. However, He
29 Groothius, 25.30 Kinnaman and Lyons, 204.31 Ibid., 207.
12
dealt with sin entirely different than Christians today.
This can be done in a variety of ways, and while Kinnaman
and Lyons offer several suggestions, the focus for this
topic is to teach the younger generation the importance of
living the Christian life.32
Another suggestion is to answer questions asked by the
youth. They want to know why it is okay to kill witches in
the Old Testament but not in the New Testament. An entire
appendix in Groothius’ volume on apologetics deals with
answering the objects and questions of the “the divinely
ordained genocide.”33 The genocide of the Canaanites has
left a black mark on Christianity, and the failure of
Christians to provide honest, biblical answers to questions
has left an increasingly dark view. While focusing solely on
the issue of genocide, the application of the statement made
by Stan Gundry encapsulates the failure of Christianity to
wrestle with difficult topics in a Christ-honoring way, “How
could the God of the Bible command such an indiscriminate
slaughter of an entire people, especially since in the New 32 Ibid., 204-211.33 Groothius, Appendix 2, 662-676.
13
Testament Jesus commands us to love and to pray for our
enemies? Our tendency is often to push this question into
the backs of our minds and allow it to sit there,
unresolved.”34
SUGGESTIONS FOR THE YOUTH MINISTER AND CHRISTIAN EDUCATOR
After examining one of the greatest issues facing the
Church and Christian schools, and looking at suggestions to
address and change those issues, the youth minister and
Christian educator are often left on their own to develop a
practical execution of said suggestions. The purpose of this
section is to provide the Christian educator, and the youth
minister specifically, with ways to teach the young people
of the Church and students in Christian schools the factual
basis of Christianity as well as the biblical representation
of the same.
34 C. S. Cowles, Eugene H. Merrill, Daniel L. Gard, and Tremper Longman III, Show Them No Mercy: Four Views on God and Canaanite Genocide (Edited by C.S. Cowles. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2003), 7.
14
These are solely the suggestion of the author, with the
experiences and education that the Lord has provided in his
life. It is hoped that this will help the youth minister as
well as the Christian educator, and that many of the young
people passing through the pews of the Church and halls of
the school with remain active in a healthy church.
To begin with, the youth minister must understand the
problems that are affecting his youth group. As such, this
will require avid reading and studying concerning those
issues. Reading books such as Unchristian and Already Gone will
aid him in this understanding. But reading a couple of books
will not provide enough. Additional research from
institutions such as Barna Group© and the Christian Research
Institute© will greatly aid as well. But perhaps the most
needful method of research is building relationships with
the students. They must be able to ask questions, understand
the complexities and apparent contradictions, and work
through the difficult passages. But they must do this with
the youth minister’s help. Left to their own they may
stumble across a heretical doctrine or leader, and their
15
newfound place will be much worse than before. The poor
representation of Christ is also another thing the
leadership of the Church and school must face. The world’s
understanding, particularly that of western society, of
Christianity is rather poor and low. But the youth in
churches will see the inconsistencies and eventually leave,
frustrated at the hypocritical atmosphere and ungodly
relationship it has with the world.
Understanding the problems is only half of the battle.
Fixing the problem is the other half. And this is where
takes hard work, ingenuity, and grace. However, a few
options exist that should provide the building blocks to
begin a reform within the Church and School.
How the youth minister should implement this is two-
fold: first, a series can be held covering the topics of an
apologetical nature. A series can be conducted on the
reliability of the Bible. It could be several weeks long.
One beneficial aspect would be to have a conversational feel
to the presentation, where the encouragement of questions
and answers would be given. This way, the curiosity of the
16
student is satisfied while aiding in the understanding and
memorizing of the student. Hosting these type of series and
events will only serve to develop and strengthen those
doubts into a rational faith.
But there is another method of addressing these
apologetical issues this: simply allow questions to be
asked. While it is encouraged during those times of intense
study, it should also be encouraged on a day to day basis.
There is absolutely no reason why a student cannot ask a
question regarding the Bible. These questions, no matter how
silly or misunderstood, should be answered. An atmosphere
where questions are discouraged is an atmosphere where
creativity and curiosity will die. Not only that, it will
also be left barren as students will desire to be at a place
where faith has died as well. That is how serious the matter
is.
Suggestions for topics to cover are: the reliability of
the Bible, the historicity of Jesus, the transmission and
translation process, the Canaanite genocide, the accuracy of
the Gospels, the ontological arguments for God, teleological
17
arguments for God, cosmological arguments for God,
intelligent design, and so on.35 These topics could be dealt
with on a week by week basis or a retreat could be held.
A second way of implement these times is to incorporate
it in normal times of preaching and teaching. This should
and could be done naturally. For example, if a youth
minister is beginning a series on the gospel of Matthew, he
can begin with an examination of the historical reliability
of the account. And then as he progresses through the
account he could focus on issues related to that and draw
them out. More time could be given to developing the idea of
fulfilled prophecies and how that should strengthen the
faith of the students. In casual conversations and periods
of discipleship, time should be given to teach the
reliability of the Bible, and other issues related to the
topic of apologetics.
With these two methods of implementation, the issues
facing the presenting of truth will address themselves. No
longer will the American Church take for granted the 35 For a detailed examination of these topics, see Groothius’work.
18
religious upbringing and moral uprightness of the individual
in society. These methods will greatly aid the youth
minister to minimize the loss of students in churches.
But what about the representation of the Christian
faith? How can a youth minister change the perceptions of an
entire nation? This is a more difficult endeavor, but one
not less important. Understandably, this will take time. As
it took more than a generation to create this impression of
Christianity, it will take more than a generation to address
the issue and reform the view.
Teaching the students how to act in relation to the
world is a task that is most vital to the youth minister.
The truth should never be compromised, but it can be told
and shared in such a way as to minimize resistance to it. If
people resist the truth it should be on the grounds of the
truth, not in the messenger. Students should learn how to
disagree agreeably. They must learn that Christianity is not
a political party, not homophobic, and not judgmental. The
appearance of perfection must be abolished, as people must
know that Christians are imperfect, and that hypocrisy is a
19
curse for every man. If the youth minister can ingrain this
into his students, he will be successful.
Changing the views one has is extremely difficult, but
if the youth minister and students desire to bring people
into a right relationship with God, if they desire to be a
part of something that goes beyond their own wickedness and
shortcomings, then they will begin to teach these things to
one another and then exemplify them out in the world.
SUMMARY
Apologetics, both the “rational legitimacy (objective
truth) and emotional appeal (subjective attractiveness)”
must be taught in the Church and the school.36 If youth
ministers and Christian educators fail to do so, the church
in America will fall.
36 Groothius, 25.20
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"Quotations." Diggerfortruth. March 2, 2012. Accessed March 16, 2015. https://diggerfortruth.wordpress.com/inspiring-quotations/.
Cowles, C. S., Eugene H. Merrill, Daniel L. Gard, and Tremper Longman III. Show Them No Mercy: Four Views on God and Canaanite Genocide. Edited by C.S. Cowles. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2003.
Gandhi, Mahatma. "A Quote by Mahatma Gandhi." Goodreads. Accessed March 16, 2015. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/22155-i-like-your-christ-i-do-not-like-your-christians.
Groothuis, Douglas R. Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith. Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic ;, 2011.
Ham, Ken, and C. Britt Beemer. Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit Church and What You Can Do to Stop It. Green Forest, Ark.: Master Books, 2009.
Kinnaman, David, and Gabe Lyons. Unchristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity-- and Why It Matters. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 2007.
Markos, Louis. Apologetics for the Twenty-first Century. Wheaton, Ill.:Crossway, 2010.
21