Antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder - Mednet
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder - Mednet
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS
FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Ilan Z Kafka MD 2009
Overactive Bladder
Defining symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome
(OAB) are
Urinary urgency with or without incontinence
Frequency
Nocturia
1 Abrams P Cardozo L Fall M et al The standardization of terminology of
lower urinary tract function report from the Standardization Sub-committee
of the International Continence Societyrdquo Neurourol Urodyn (2002)21 pp
167ndash178
Overactive Bladder
Urge Incontinence
bull Sudden amp involuntary loss of urine
Frequency
bull 8 or more visits to the toilet per 24 hours
Urination at night
bull 2 or more visits to toiletduring sleeping hours
OAB
Urgency
bull Sudden strong desire to urinate
Overactive Bladder
Adapted from Tubaro et al 2004
Overactive Bladder
Local pathology
infection
bladder stones
bladder tumors
interstitial cystitis
outlet obstruction
Metabolic factors
diabetes
polydipsia
Medications
diuretics
antidepressants
antihypertensives
hypnotics amp sedatives
narcotics amp analgesics
Other factors
pregnancy
psychological issues
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Overactive Bladder
Defining symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome
(OAB) are
Urinary urgency with or without incontinence
Frequency
Nocturia
1 Abrams P Cardozo L Fall M et al The standardization of terminology of
lower urinary tract function report from the Standardization Sub-committee
of the International Continence Societyrdquo Neurourol Urodyn (2002)21 pp
167ndash178
Overactive Bladder
Urge Incontinence
bull Sudden amp involuntary loss of urine
Frequency
bull 8 or more visits to the toilet per 24 hours
Urination at night
bull 2 or more visits to toiletduring sleeping hours
OAB
Urgency
bull Sudden strong desire to urinate
Overactive Bladder
Adapted from Tubaro et al 2004
Overactive Bladder
Local pathology
infection
bladder stones
bladder tumors
interstitial cystitis
outlet obstruction
Metabolic factors
diabetes
polydipsia
Medications
diuretics
antidepressants
antihypertensives
hypnotics amp sedatives
narcotics amp analgesics
Other factors
pregnancy
psychological issues
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Overactive Bladder
Urge Incontinence
bull Sudden amp involuntary loss of urine
Frequency
bull 8 or more visits to the toilet per 24 hours
Urination at night
bull 2 or more visits to toiletduring sleeping hours
OAB
Urgency
bull Sudden strong desire to urinate
Overactive Bladder
Adapted from Tubaro et al 2004
Overactive Bladder
Local pathology
infection
bladder stones
bladder tumors
interstitial cystitis
outlet obstruction
Metabolic factors
diabetes
polydipsia
Medications
diuretics
antidepressants
antihypertensives
hypnotics amp sedatives
narcotics amp analgesics
Other factors
pregnancy
psychological issues
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Overactive Bladder
Adapted from Tubaro et al 2004
Overactive Bladder
Local pathology
infection
bladder stones
bladder tumors
interstitial cystitis
outlet obstruction
Metabolic factors
diabetes
polydipsia
Medications
diuretics
antidepressants
antihypertensives
hypnotics amp sedatives
narcotics amp analgesics
Other factors
pregnancy
psychological issues
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Overactive Bladder
Local pathology
infection
bladder stones
bladder tumors
interstitial cystitis
outlet obstruction
Metabolic factors
diabetes
polydipsia
Medications
diuretics
antidepressants
antihypertensives
hypnotics amp sedatives
narcotics amp analgesics
Other factors
pregnancy
psychological issues
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Ideal Pharmacologic Treatment for OAB
Safety
Metabolic drug-drug interactions
CNS effects
Cardiovascular safety
Efficacy
Alleviate or significantly improve symptoms
Improve QOL
Tolerability
Fewer AEs
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Abrams P Wein AJ The Overactive Bladdermdash A
Widespread and Treatable Condition 1998
Bladder (detrusor muscle)
Salivary
glands Dry mouth
Colon Constipation
Heart
Stomach and esophagusDyspepsia
Irisciliary body
Lacrimal gland
Blurred vision
Dry eyes
Tachycardia
bull Dizziness
bull Somnolence
bull Impaired
memory and
cognition
CNS
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in Target
Organs of the Parasympathetic Nervous System
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Distribution of cholinergic and adrenergic
receptors in the urinary bladder
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Antimuscarinic Treatment Options
Tolterodine LA
(Detrusitol) 4 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin XL
(Lyrinel) 5ndash15 mg Once-daily
Oxybutynin
(Novitropan) 5ndash30 mg BID or TID
Oxybutynin
transdermal patch 39 mgd 1 patch BIW
Trospium (Spasmex) 15 mg TID
Solifenacin (Vesicare)5ndash10 mg Once-daily
Darifenacin
(Enablex) 75ndash15 mg Once-daily
DRUG DOSE FREQUENCY
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Are All Antimuscarinics the Same
A meta-analysis found
All antimuscarinics were proven effective for
thetreatment of OAB
Individual antimuscarinic profiles are different
There is some evidence of differences among adverse-
event (AE) profiles
There are differences in tolerability profiles which may
be clinically significant
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Comparative efficacy antimuscarinic
medications
Study
Drugs
Compared Efficacy Side Effects
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin and
tolterodine
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
and withdrawals with
tolterodine
Pooled data (Cochrane
2005)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
OPERA (Diokno et al
2003)
Oxybutinin ER and
tolterodine ER
Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
overall tolerability
similar
Trospium and oxybutinin(Halaska et al 2003)
Oxybutinin and trospium Similar in most outcome
variables
Slightly less dry mouth
with trospium
STAR (Chapple et al
2005)
Solifenacin and
tolterodine ER
Solifenacin had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Similar rates of side
effects
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine (Chapple et
al 2008)
Tolterodine and
fesoterodine
Fesoterodine had slightly
better efficacy than
tolterodine ER
Slightly less dry mouth
with tolterodine ER
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with
antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
Novara G Galfano A Secco S DElia C Cavalleri S Ficarra V Artibani W
Eur Urol 2008 Oct54(4)740-63
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Not All Antimuscarinic Agents Are the Same
Structural differences
Molecular size polarity permeability
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Metabolism and excretionDrug-drug interaction
Efficacy Tolerability Safety
Receptor specificity organ selectivity patient variability
(individual age race gender)
Khullar V et al Urology 200668(2 suppl)38-48
Shaya FT et al Am J Manag Care 200511(4 suppl)S121-S129
Staskin DR Drug Aging 2005221013-1028
Wein AJ Urol 200362(5 suppl 2)20-27
Pak RW et al Curr Urol Rep 20034436-440
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Comparison of antimuscarinic Drugs
Hepatic
Impairment
Renal ImpairmentHalf-Life (h)SELECTIVITYDRUG
CautionCaution13ndash19Selective predominantly
M3
Darifenacin
CautionMildmoderate start with 4 mg
increase dose cautiously to 8mg
Severe 4mg
7Non-SelectiveFesoterodine
CautionCaution2ndash3Selective predominantly
M1M3
Oxybutynin
CautionMax dose 30mg14-22Non-SelectivePropiverine
CautionMildmoderate no adjustment
Severe max 5mg
45ndash68Selective predominantly
M3
Solifenacin
CautionMildmoderate no data Severe
max 2_1mg IR or 2mg ER
Tolterodine 2ndash3
5-HMT 3-4
Non-SelectiveTolterodine
CautionMildmoderate caution
Severe max 20mg
10ndash20Non-SelectiveTrospium
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Antimuscarinic drug Receptor affinity
How do medications used to treat urinary incontinence
affect the cerebral function of the elderly Urologe
2007 middot 46387ndash392
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Anticholinergic drugs used for OABS and drugs
that can potentiate their adverse effects
Drugs that can potentiate AErsquos
Anti-arrythmics
Anti- depressants
Anti-Diarrheal
Antihstamines
Antipsychotics
Muscle Relaxants
Anticholinergic Agents
Anti- emetics
Drugs to treat Parkinsonrsquos
Antispasmodics
MydriaticsCyclopegics
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Cognitive Function in Patient Receiving
Antimuscarinic Therapy
Antimuscarinics used in the treatment of overactive bladder differ in their potential to affect cognitive function
In particular treatment with agents that block
M1M3 receptors in the brain are known to cause cognitive impairment
Darifenacin and tolterodine stand out as having been shown to not cause impairment of memory or other cognitive functions in randomized clinical trials
Preserving cognitive function for patients with overactive
bladder evidence for a differential effect with darifenacin
Kay GG Ebinger U Int J Clin Pract 2008 Nov62(11)1792-800
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Two randomized double blind phase III 12-week studies
n = 800
n = 1135
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
FES 4 or 8mg od vsplacebo (PL)
Active control arm of tolterodine extended
release (TOL ER) 4mg od
Primary endpoints (a) the reduction from baseline (BL) in the mean number of voids per
24-hour period
(b) the reduction in the mean number of episodes of urge incontinence
per 24-hour period both assessed over a 3-day period at study end
(c) treatment response derived from a 4-category pt-assessed
treatment benefit scale
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No of Voids24 hrs
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Mean Change in Baseline in No episodes in Urge
Incontinence 24h
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Patient Responding to Treatment ()Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-
738
p lt 001 p lt 0001 vs PL
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Kate McKeage Gillian M Keating
FesoterodineDrugs 2009 69 (6) 731-738
y = incidence lt1
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
-Post hoc analysis
-n=1135
-HrQol- Incontinent vs All
-Max Dose Fesoterodine (8mg) vs Max Dose Tolterodine (4mg)
2008Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladderChapple
CR Van Kerrebroeck PE Juumlnemann KP Wang JT Brodsky M BJU Int 2008
Nov102(9)1128-32
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
BJU Int 2010 Vol 105( 1)p58-56
n=636 12 week follow-up - double-blind double dummy placebo-controlled RCT
Endpoints - Changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint)
-Total and nocturnal voids urgency episodes severe urgency episodes and
frequency-urgency sum per 24 h mean voided volume per void (MVV) OAB
questionnaire (OAB-q) Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and
Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
- Safety and tolerability
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs tolterodine ER
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P lt 005 vs placebo daggerP lt 005
fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER
Pati
ent P
erce
ptio
n of
Bla
dder
Cond
itio
n
Urg
en
cy P
erc
ep
tio
n S
ca
le
daggerP lt 0001 fesoterodine vs
tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) DaggerP lt
0001
tolterodine vs placebo (post hoc
comparison)
P lt 0001
fesoterodine vs placebo daggerP = 0014 fesoterodine
vs tolterodine ER (post hoc comparison) The
tolterodine ER vs placebo comparison was not
significant (P = 0167)
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder
BJU International Volume 102 Issue 9 Date November 2008 Pages 1128-1132
Christopher R Chapple Philip E Van Kerrebroeck Klaus-Peter Juumlnemann Joseph T Wang Marina Brodsky
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Urology ARTICLE IN PRESS 2009Nov 13
N= 358 men fesoterodine 4 mg- n =120
fesoterodine 8 mg n = 114
placebo n =124
subanalysis of pooled data
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
P 05 vs placebo dagger P 05 vs fesoterodine 4 mg
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
ANTIMUSCARINIC DRUGS FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Conclusions
OAB is a highly prevalent condition
As our population ages rates will increase
OAB has a large impact on our patientrsquos quality of
life
Patients perceive benefit with therapy and
improvements in quality of life have been
demonstrated
Pharmacotherapy is better in combination with other
non pharmacological therapies
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip
Conclusions
Multiple OAB agents are available
Many are well proven over years of use and
research
New choices do not necessarily mean better choices
Clinical effectiveness is key
Range of side effects and incidences
M1M3 selectivity may lead to additional
unwanted AEs
THANK YOUhellip