Ahraura 473275.pdf - SUDA UP

Reference Guide for Third party euality Monitoring-2017

Annexure 3Third Party Quality Monitoring Report of BLC projects under pMAy

Name of TPQM Agency lnnovative CADD Centre lndore102,Arpan Apartment 35, Saket Nagar, lndore

Date of Visit 10-12-2018

Current Visit No. 1st

Date of Previous visit Nit

A. PARTICULARS OF PROJECTI Name of the State /UT: Uttar Pradesh

2 Name of the City: Mirzapur

3 Name of Project:Construction of 473 DUs under pMAy

2sth csMc Dt.23/08/20174 Project Code: 09007619014N0

5 lmplementing Agency/ ULB Ahraura

6 Location of the Project AllWards of ULB

7Type of Project : (i) BLC (New Construction),(ii)BLC (Enhancement) BLC (New Construction)

8 No. of Houses in the project 473

9 Date of Approval by SLSMC 20108120t7

10

Approved Project Cost (Rs. Lakhs): Central share State shareULB/ IA Beneficiary

Total

(in Lakhs) | (in Lakhs) l(in Lakhs) in Lakhs; | (in Lakhs)

709.s I qtt.o 0.0 615.9 1798.4

11Date of sanction of 1"t installment of CentralAssistance by CSMC

23-08-20t7

12 Duration of the project I Yrs

13 Date of CommencementScheduled Actual

23-08-2017 07-09-20t7

14 Date of CompletionScheduled Expected

23-08-20r 8 07-09-20 r 8

15lnspection undertaken by (Name)(with contact detail) :

S.K.Khandelwal 9424468805

Tausiflqbal 9111008971

16 Name of State representative present Not Present

17 Name of ULB representative present Anoop Singh 8948370539

18Name of Community representative presentduring visit

List Enclosed with Photos

19 Whether list of Beneficiaries finalized ? Yes

20lf finalised, whether uploaded in PMAY MIS?

Yes

21

State any deviation from sanctioned DPR interms of number of houses or size or locationor Lavout

No

22 Any other comment No

lnnoyrtive

Reference Guide for Third Party Quality Monitoring-2017

Annexure 3Third Paty Quality Monitoring Report of BLC projects under pMAy

Name of TPQM Agency lnnovative CADD Centre lndore

102,Arpan Apartment 35, Saket Nagar, lndoreDate of Visit 10-12-2018

Current Visit No. 1st

Date of Previous visit Nit

A. PARTICULARS OF PROJECT1 Name of the State /UT: Uttar Pradesh

2 Name of the City: Mirzapur

3 Name of Project:Construction of 275 DUS under pMAy

22nd CSMC Dt.29l0s/20L7

4 Project Code: 09007619014N0

5 I mplementing Agency/ ULB Ahraura

6 Location of the Project All Wards of ULB

7Type of Project : (i) BLC (New Construction),(ii)BLC (Enhancement) BLC (New Construction)

8 No. of Houses in the project 275

I Date of Approval by SLSMC 26t0512017

10

Approved Project Cost (Rs. Lakhs): Central share State shareULB/ IA Beneficiary

Total

(in Lakhs) | (in Lakhs) l(in Lakhs) in Lakhs) | (rn Lakhs)

4t2.5 38.5 0.0 404.3 8s 5.3

11Date of sanction of 1'r installment of CentralAssistance by CSMC

29-05-20t7

12 Duration of the project I Yrs

13 Date of CommencementScheduled Actual

29-05-2017 13-06-20t7

14 Date of CompletionScheduled Expected

29-05-2018 1 3-06-20 r 8

15lnspection undertaken by (Name)(with contact detail) :

S.K.Khandelwal 9424468805

Tausiflqbal 9111008971

16 Name of State representative present Not Present

17 Name of ULB representative present Anoop Singh 8948370539

18Name of Community representative presentduring visit

List Enclosed with Photos

19 Whether list of Beneficiaries finalized ? Yes

20lf finalised, whether uploaded in PMAY MIS?

Yes

21

State any deviation from sanctioned DPR interms of number of houses or size or locationor Lavout.

No


lnnovative CadA Cenrr


1

Whether ULB/ State have organized workshop/ trainingprograms to educate the beneficiaries about quality,construction methods, adherence to disaster resistanttechnologies etc.

Yes

2Whether testing facilities to check quality of material isavailable? NO

3

Whether regular tests of materials and constructionproducts tests of materials are being done from accreditedlabs also?

No, tt has been directed to establish the

material testing lab.

4 (i) Whether the structural Designs are approved / Proofchecked by competent Authority

NA

(ii) Name of the approving authority for structural design. NA

(iii) Whether the statuary certificate for disaster resistancedesign and compliance of codal provision isendorsed by thestructural designer on the structural drawings fit forexecution, Specially in case of multi- storied construction.

Not Required

(iv) The work is being executed as per the approveddrawings fit for execution.

NO

5

Whether the lnspection Registers, Site order book andQuality control Test registers are maintained and endorsedby the Engineer-in-charge?

No, ( Instruction given to maintain the site

order book, Inspection register & Qualitycontrol Test register.

6Whether cement, steel, aggregates etc. being used in thework, got tested before use?

No (materials being purchaged by

beneficiary. )

7

Whether manufacturer test certificate for cement, steel,pipes etc. have been obtained with supply and records arebeing maintained?

NA

8Whether Cement is free from lumps and is stacked properlyto prevent contact with moisture?

Yes

9

Whether soil investigations of the site proper have beendone before the structural design and soil parameters havebeen accounted for in the structural design/ drawings? lfyes, attach copy of soil investigation report.

Soil investigations have been done

lnnovativc

ICenter

Reference Guide for Third Party Quality Monitoring-2017 *&

10

Whether centering /shuttering is checked for staging &propping, line & level, dimensions, cleaning etc. and itsquallty approved before each stage and record maintained.

No record have been maintained,

11

Specific control on RCC work like: mixing by full bagcapacity hopper fed mixer, control of slump, placing/compaction with vibrator. (proportioning with boxes notpermitted)

Mannual mixing with hand compaction inminor work.

12Whether cement register is maintained and checked at site.Comment on method of stacking.

No cement register have been maintained andthe work has been carried out on pettypurchases.

13Whether concrete mix is nominal or design mix? (Nominalmix not permitted for quality concrete). Nominal mix has being used

14

What is the Mode of Concrete mixing (batch mir/ manual)?ln case of manual mixing, whether mixing is by weight or byvolume of ingredients? (Volumetric mixing not permitted).

Volumetric mannual mixing has been used.

15Whether MixerA/ibrator as specified is available at site withadequate means to run them during concreting?

During visit not found

16Whether Surface of reinforcement is clean and free fromrust? Yes

17 Whether potable water is used for construction ? YES

18 Whether proper water / cement ratio has been ensured? NA

19Whether the concrete being cured adequately as perrequirements? YES

20Whether bricks are well burnt, of rectangular shape, withsharp edges, free from cracks and of correct size?

YES

21 Whether

i) Execution of Depth & width of Foundation is as perdrawing/ adequate & bottom levelled

ii) Plinth height is as per drawing/ adequate

iii) Horizontal bands (as applicable) have been provided

Adequate

Adequate

Partially Provided.

22Whether quality has been checked by TPQMtu Stateagency? lf yes, details there of ?

YES, ULB stafThas been checked. Foundgood quality of work.

lnnovativc Center

&d6 Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) - Housing for All Mission

23 Quality of work and workmanship, Comments on

(i)

RCC work (concrete, Reinforcement detailing, cover toreinforcement). Whether Columns are in plumb (check forverticality)

Jointing and RCC bands are partiallyprovided

( ii)Masonry (Joint details, verticality).Check adequate RCCbands are provided. Masonary work is good.

( iii)Shuttering (Type of material-pucca/ katcha, support spacing)

Steel shuttering are mainly used but

somewhere wooden shuttering are also used

with steel shuttering.

(iv)Bar bending and stirrups bending , placement and cover toreinforcement bars.

Provided.

(v) Plastering Good

(vi) Doors and windows Satisfactory

(vii) Seepage, if any Not found

(viii) Cracks, if any NA

(ix) Honey combing, if any No

(x) Any other Satisfactory

24Whether provision has been made for Service lines(Electrical, Water Supply,Sanitation etc.)

Yes

25Whether floor slope (especially) in bath,WC, kitchen, terraceand balcony etc. are proper?

Yes

26

Whether adequate plinth height ( above the general ground

level) is provided to the ground floor of the building to avoidpossibility of rainwater and reptiles in the building.

Yes

27Whether dampness/leakages noticed? lf yes, state locationand probable reasons.

No dampness fbund

28Whether remedial measures are undertaken by IAJ ULB tostop Dampness & Leakages if any?

lnstruction has been given during visit.

29Whether disaster resistant features have been

incorporated?

The construction is being canied by

beneficiaries and quality of construction

maintained satisfactory.

30

Any other comments The inspected sites are in order and

construction is being carried out by

beneficiaries themselves . The construction

31 Report on Overall assessment of qualityOn inspection of houses under ULB , We

found that all houses are in different level .

On visual inspection of these houses Qualityofconcrete in beam coloun and slab is fbund

satisfactory.

lnnovrtivl f,add


C. PROGRESS. HOUSING COMPONENTS1 Numbers of houses sanctioned in the Project 473 275

2 Numbers of houses Completed 55 0

3 Numbers of houses in progress 418 275

4 Stages of Progress:

i) Foundation level (Nos.) 122 20

ii) Plinth level (Nos.) t2t 25

iii) Lintel level (Nos.) 124 I l0

iv) Roof level (Nos.) 2t 75

v) Finishing level (Nos.) 30 45

5 Numbers of houses not started 0 0

b Reason for non-starter of houses, if any Surrendred

7 Numbers of houses occupied by the Beneficiaries 0

8Reasons for Non-occupation of houses (lf any)- specificreasons to be given

IJnder construction

9 Size of Unit (Carpet Area)

Sanctioned As per lmplementation

Proposed avg. 30

sq.m

Most of the houses are

30 sqm

10 Overall physical progress of Housing (in %) Approx (52%)

11Whether the progress of houses has been ensured throughgeotagged photographs at various construction level?

Yes

12Whether DBT of fund to individual beneficiary is ensured in

the project?Yes

13 Whether the building plan(s) conform to NBC norms? Yes

14Whether authenticated building plans and revisions if any,are available?

Yes

15 Deviation, if any No


D.C IVIC INFRASTRUCTURE

1

Whether provision of Civic infrastructure components (i.e.

water supply, Sewerage, Drainage, Roads, SWM etc.) has

been ensured?Yes

Cent*r

Siqa r'

ffi eraOnan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) - Housing for All Mission

2

Whether the Existing/proposed infrastructure componentsare independent and/or integrated with city levelinfrastructure?

NA

3 Any other comments No

E. SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

1

Whether provision of Social Amenities (i.e. School,Anganwadi, Health centre, Community centre, Livelihoodcentre etc.) has been ensured?

Yes

2 Any other comments No

F. FINANCIAL PROGRESS & FUND UTILIZAT|ON 1ns. n Lakhs)

1 Sanctioned fund for entire project. 1798.40 855.2s

2 Amount of funds received up to date 473.00 275.00

3 Upto date Expenditure 473.00 275.00

4 Amount of funds Utilized (out of received) 473.00 275.00

5 Amount of Expenditure by ULB Nil Nil

6 Amount of Expenditure by Beneficiaries Construction work is being done by

beneficiaries

7 Balance funds Expected/due from stakeholders 473.00 275.00

G. COST VARIATION and TIME-OVERRUNSGost variation:

1Whether there is cost variation? lf yes, what are thereasons?

Not applicable for BLC works

Time Overruns:

1Whether there is time overrun? lf yes, what are thereasons?

Not applicable for BLC works

H. REMEDIAL MEASURES TO IMPROVE PROGRESS AND QUALITYUndertaken by lmplementation agency to improve the:

1 Physical Progress 52o/o

2 Financial ProgressTimely payment of installments must be

assured to benefi ciaries.

3 Quality managementSupervision from the side of PMC need to be

imoroved for quality.

4 Comments and suggestions of TPQMA on above

Construction carried out by beneficiaries are

good. Maintain a workshop fbr beneficiaries

ward wise to give knowledge aboutnnncfrrrntinn

I. COURT CASES AND LITIGATIONS

1 (To be specified) Nil

Ccnt.'1

Reference Guide for Third party euality Monitoring-2017 tsr&J. OTHERS

-

1

Any innovative/ cost effective/ green technotogy fris beenused NO

2Feedback of beneficiaries regarding provision of ph!,sical &Social infrastructure: Satisl'actory

3Reasons for delay in completion of housing andlnfrastructure, if any: Work in progress

4Any specific observation by the beneficiary

No

5 Overall observation on the project (with adequatephotographs covering project to a large extent includingquality issues as applicable)

1. Critical observations

2. Action suggested by TPQMA to SLNA and lA

Progress ofthe project is satisfactory

Nil6 Action taken report on previous report:

i. Observations of TPQMA

ii Action suggested by TPQMA

iii Action taken by Beneficiaries/ lA (lmplementationAgency)iv Whether TPQMA is satisfied with the action taken

This was first visit

7 TPQMA's Overview of the Project (in 400-500 words) in aseparate sheet The overall project progress is satisfactory

and beneficiaries are active. the constructionis being carried by beneficiaries themselves

and guidance on construction techniques is

being provided by PMC. To improve thequality of work regular visit of ULB officialsis recommended.

lnnovativg Cadd Center

Centre lndoref '

Name of Community representative present duri

S.No

ULB NAME-:Ahraurare se nt visit

Benf, Name Father/Husband Name

l SLIN I t, KANHAIYA LALZ WASEI]M AMA KHA3 AIIMAT) lqbal'4 DI]DI]AN RAN4 KISHAN5 AI.'SAR AI,I MUNNA6 MOH D RAI]ES NABI TJAKIISH7 SAEED AHMAT) SAHAMAT ALIB MOHD ASIF pAUD

:SlDDtQt9 N ISHA MAKSOOD AI.IMAD10 RAZIYA BEGUM MAQSUD11 N4OH D OIVIAR LAI, MOHDt'2 NAZIM AI.I M0rlD At,t

3 WASF,F-N4 l.A'l'lr tlASl"lt ER

4 AHM trD AllMl_t)5 BLIDDI.I RAM MAI]ESH6 BHARA'I LAL SUI(H NANDAN7 l\4 IT H I t,ES I-{ NARBADA PRASADB KUMARI BACHNU

19 KANTI DEVI MAIlAVEER?.0 r\4EENA DI-]VI BI.IU I-LA N

2l WAI,I N,I0III) CIIADDHANz2 RAI\4 PA'I'I SA'I'IUDDIN))

t\4 0CAN A SI.iIV NARAYAN't4 LOOl'AN SEEPAL

25 SA N'IOSH BACH N U

Z6 CHHOTE LAI- RAM DAS

Z7 MOHD RAFEEQ HAMEED ULLAH2B RA] KU MARI SOHAN I,AL29 s r-rA HJA l-rA Ml-lllM00D AHMAr)30 RAIIAN l.Al. A I\4 I] IKA P I{ASA t)

J] RAI]IYA MOI]D SAI,IM

32 DIrVI PRASAT) SHIV DAI'T

33 RUKAIYA tsANO SHABT}ER AH MAD

34 MOHD SI]AREEF CAFOOR

35 SANTOSH RAM SAMN37 MIvl MII.AN DEVTA DEF]N

3B RITHANA UACAN4 NAIrlrtlS AHlvlil)39 L,AIKt]N NISIIA MO}ID SHAN4IM

40 NAZlvlA llAN0 MOBI.,TN AI]MAt)

4I LAIKUN NISIIA M0llD sllAMir\4

42 IIASMAl'AI,I SHOKAT AI,,I

43 NAZIVIA BANO I\4OBEEN AITMAD

44 ACAT PAL SONA]

45 ZAREENA IJANO SI-]AFEEQ AHMED

46 LAL MOH D C}l I.IUTTAN

47 BI N DESHWA RI RAlvl SWAR00P

4il All1'lSllAl\4 AI(HTAR IIUSAIN

32 POONAM DEVI SI-]AN KAR IVIAU RYA

33 RUKSANA BANO LATE BASIR AI-lMAD

34 SAMEENA BANO NASIR AHMAD

35 SHARIF AHMAD DASTA GGEER

36 SURESH MAURYA LATE BADRI MAURYA

37 GANGA SAGAR LATE BIHARI ViSHKARMA

38 Vishvnath Khannu

Cha n dra wa ti Mangru Ram

Late Rambaliiaajnarayan tJ Late Shivdihal

Swarathkshmi Prasad rly.l

Khan

Vinod

lnnov rti* e

Ahraura

xr$n'., ^

dd Cente

-tr

^l' ,",,l

aI*"t,1

',T!E.

C

Ahraura

tnnoYtttYffi ccntcr

'$

,ffi:*,$*-.:

*os&*'"'

Ahraura 473275.pdf - SUDA UP

Documents

Transcript of Ahraura 473275.pdf - SUDA UP