AGENDA MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Regular ...

AGENDA MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Regular Meeting of the Board of Education

Manteca USD Administration Office 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca

Tuesday, April 18, 2017 - - Open Session 7:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A QUORUM

OPEN SESSION Public Comment on Items on the Closed Session Agenda

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS — 6:00 p.m. 1. Student Disciplinary Actions: 17-023W, 17-024W, 17-025W, 17-026W, 17-027W, 17-028W,

17-029W, and 17-030W 2. Public School Employment, Certificated Personnel 3. Public School Employment, Classified Personnel 4. Public School Employment, School Site Assistants 5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation: Superintendent 6. Public Employee Performance Evaluations: Deputy Superintendents 7. Public School Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release/Reassignment/Evaluation of

Performance (Government Code 54957) 8. Conference With Labor Negotiators, Manteca Educators Association/CTA/NEA, Pursuant

to Government Code 54957.6, Roger Goatcher, Negotiator 9. Pending Litigation — One Case 10. Potential Litigation — One Case 11. Conference With Real Property Negotiator, Jason Messer, Negotiator (Government Code

54956.8)

OPEN SESSION — 7:00 p.m.

FLAG SALUTE

ANNOUNCEMENT(s) Report Any Action Taken in Closed Session

NOTICE(s) 1. Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints, Education Code 35186(d)

Manteca Unified School District Board of Education Meeting Agenda April 18, 2017

PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Receive Input From the Public Regarding the Adoption of the Statutory School Mitigation

Fee Justification Study 2. Receive Input From the Public Regarding the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

for the Nile Garden School Water Supply Project

CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1. Approve Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017 (S0X50729) 2. Adopt Resolution 16/17-70, Authorizing the Absence of Board Member Nancy Teicheira

From the Meeting of Tuesday, March 7, 2017, Due to Illness (S0X50729) 3. Approve Superintendent's Termination of After School Program (Weston Ranch) Agreement

(50X50729) 4. Approve Receipt of Donations (S0X50729) 5. Approve Requests to Waive Credits in Physical Education From High School Graduation

Requirements (ESX50741) 6. Adopt Certificated Personnel Assignment Order 17-10 (HRX50742) 7. Adopt Classified Personnel Assignment Order 17-11 (1-1RX-504742) 8. Adopt School Site Assistant Personnel Assignment Order 17-12 (HRX50742) 9. Approve Short-Term Staff Permits (HRX50742) 10. Approve Single Subject Waiver (HRX50742) 11. Adopt Resolution 16/17-72 Certifying the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for

the Nile Garden School Water Project for the Manteca Unified School District (01)SX50765) 12. Approve Certification That All Temporary Athletic Team Coaches Have the Provisions of

Title 5 California Code Regulations 5593 and 5594 (F1150742) 13. Authorization to Dispose of Obsolete Equipment and Materials — 3rd Quarter 2017

(BSX50728) 14. Acceptance of District Warrants (BSX50728) 15. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-023W 16. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-024W 17. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-025W 18. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-026W 19. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-027W 20. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-028W 21. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-029W 22. Adoption of Student Disciplinary Action 17-030W

PUBLIC COMMENT/REQUESTS TO SPEAK FROM THE PUBLIC This is an opportunity for the public to address the Board. The individual shall be allowed three minutes to address the Board and are encouraged to complete a yellow sheet (not required) to provide a record of their input and so they can be recognized by name by the President of the Board. The Board shall limit the total time for public input on each agenda item to 21 minutes. Persons addressing the Board arc requested to do so from the podium. With Board consent, the President may increase or decrease the time allowed for public presentation, depending on the topic and the number of persons wishing to be heard. The President may take a poll of speakers for or against a particular issue and may ask that additional persons speak only if they have something new to add.


Depending upon the nature of the presentations, the Board President or Superintendent may respond or the President may call upon Board members for brief comments, questions of clarification, provide a reference to staff, or other resources for factual information, or request the Superintendent to report back to the Board at a subsequent meeting or in I Iighlights concerning the matter.

I lowever, in compliance with the Ralph NI. Brown Act, the Board is not permitted to take action on non-agenda items, unless an emergenlcy situation exists as defined in Government Code Section 54956.5. If appropriate, the Board may direct the Superintendent to schedule an item for a future Board agenda.

ACTION AGENDA ITEMS Board of Education/Superintendent's Reports and Items (Ext. 50729)

1. Report: Growth Steering Committee and Davis Demographics Comprehensive Study 2. Adoption of Resolution 16/17-71, Statutory School Facilities Fees and Adoption of California

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption 3. Consider, Discuss and Give Direction Regarding Elementary Counseling Program

Student Board Member Reports, Items and Comments (Ext. 50729)

4. Report: Joe Contreras Student Board Report

Operations/Human Resources Reports and Items (Ext. 50742)

5. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-75, Accepting Final Completion of RFP #P1516-010 Contract for the Boardroom AV System Replacement Project, CompView

FUTURE BOARD AGENDA ITEM(s) (if needed)

BOARD COMMENTS

CLOSED SESSION (if needed)

OPEN SESSION/ANNOUNCEMENT(S) Report Any Action Taken in Closed Session

ADJOURNMENT Future Board Meeting

April 25, 2017 - - Board Recognitions - - 6:00 p.m. May 9, 2017 - - Regular Meeting - - 7:00 p.m.

Manteca USD Administration Building 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA

If vou need special accommodation to participate in the meeting due to a disability, please telephone the District Superintendent's office at (209) 858-0729.

Any writings or documents that are public records and are provided to a majority of the Governing Board regarding an open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the District Office located at 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, during normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted on the District's website at www.mantccausd.net.


LEGEND: BA/R: SO/BS: ES/P: OS/HR: G: 0:

Board Action/Request Superintendent's Office & Business Services Educational Services & Programs Operational Services & Human Resources Goals Objectives


Manteca Unified School Board

Goals and Objectives

rk A a nteca Unified is proud of the ongoing commitment of the people who M are the driving force behind the programs and projects which support the Boardt vision and the District's mission.

We are "Proud to be MUSD!"

#proudtobemusd

We!co me to the. Manteca Unifier) School District. The School Board

defines the overall vision and mission statements to serve as guidance and to clarify purpose for the district. Annually the Board ofTrustees reviews and

readopts the goals and objectives as set

forth in this document.

Vis ion Statement: Manteca Unified School District

will ensure every school day is relevant, rigorous, and leads students to become productive and engaged members of a global society while residing in the

central valley.

Making a positive diference to eGdiand

ever! s tu den t daily.

h A ission Statement: V Manteca Unified School District

is committed to providing a safe

environment where all students will thrive with the tools, resources and

support needed to achieve their

academic and personal potentials.

Doard Goals: UMUSD promotes a culturally proficient, safe learning and working environment.

MUSD promotes a creative and collaborative educational system

founded on a Pre-K through 5th grade program that supports critical thinking and effective communication as students achieve or exceed proficiency. As

students build upon thatfoundation; they will discover a 6th-8th grade

program that engages future ready

learners; and as they move into 9th-12th grades, individual needs of students will

be uniquely metto prepare them for

their future success.

MUSD promotes a shift in thinking with the relationship between teaching and

student learning.

nbioctiws: V Provide programs, resources and support designed to improve the academic performance of all students

including unduplicated students as defined by LCAR

Provide School Readiness Programs for all 4-year olds.

Support District-wide student wellness programs and activities which promote good nutrition, healthy living, physical fitness,and positive self image.

Support LOGIC, AgVenture, Steppin'Out, Planet Party, Science Camp, and Career

Pathway events.

Support programming that connects and engages 6th-13th grade students.

Support and expand Pathway Programs

for 9th-12th grades including, but not limited to Vocational Education,

Career and Technical Education, Advanced Placement, Honors, Visual and

Performing Arts, and other programs that promote rigor and relevance for all

students to be future ready.

Work with staff, the community, and

the Board to maintain a fiscally sound budget.

Continue to maintain a positive working relationship among and across all

employee groups.

Continue to support efforts to improve

existing school facilities so that these facilities remain safe and effective places

to learn.

Develop communications and outreach

efforts that enhance support of

MUSD and its schools throughout the community.

Orrice co SUPERINTENDENT

Manteca Un riled SchoGI Otstrla

2271 West Louise Ave. Manteca, CA 95337

P.O. Box 32 Manteca, CA 95336

wwwinantecausd.net

Manteca Unified School District Board of Education Meeting

NOTICE

Department: SO Type: Notice

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Superintendent's Office

TITLE: Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints, l',ducation Code 351866 (d)

Background/Rationale: Attached is the Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints, pursuant to the Education Code section 35186(d).

There were no complaints filed during the quarter ending April 15, 2017.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: N/A

Presentation: E No ❑ Yes (attached) 17 Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved/Reviewed By: Superintendent's Office

2271 lVest Lollise Ave., illanteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board .

Jason Messer Print Name of Dist t Superint

of District Supe ntendent

San Joaquin County Office of Education ValenzuelaICAHSEE Lawsuit Settlement

Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints [Education Code § 35186(d)]

District: Manteca Unified School District

Person completing this form: _ Jason Messer Title: Superintendent

Quarterly Report Submission Date:

O January 15, 2017 (check one)

O April 15, 2017 LI July 15, 2017 ❑ October 15, 2016

Date for information to be reported publicly at governing board meeting: April 18, 2017

Please check the box that applies:

No complaints were filed with any school in the district during the quarter indicated above.

❑ Complaints were filed with schools in the district during the quarter indicated above. The following chart summarizes the nature and resolution of these complaints.

General Subject Area Total # of

Complaints # Resolved # Unresolved

Textbooks and Instructional

Materials

Teacher Vacancy or Misassignment

Facilities Conditions

TOTALS


Agenda Item

Department: SO Type: Public Hearing

Item Number: 1


TITLE: Receive Input from the Public Regarding the Adoption of Statutory School Mitigation Fee Justification Study.

Background/Rationale: Consideration and possible increase the Level 1 Developer Fees for Residential and Commercial Development. The School Mitigation Fee Justification Study, adoptions of findings thereon, increase in school facilities fees pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 as established by the State Allocation Board (SAB).

A Public Hearing Notice for the fee update was published in the Stockton Record and Manteca Bulletin on April 8, 2017 and April 14, 2017. Additionally, Public Notice was mailed to all interested parties, including the Building Industry Association (BIA), affected Cities, and local developers, on March 30, 2017. The School Mitigation Fee Justification Study has been made available for public review at the District Office as well as on the District website.

After receiving public input, a resolution will be considered as separate action item later in the meeting. The fees will become effective sixty (60) days after adoption of the Resolution. Consideration and adoption of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption.

Funding Source: Presentation: -N/A

n No

E Yes (attached) n Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Recommendation: N /A

Prepared By: Approved By: Superintendent's Office

ii

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • I3olar

Final Draft Report

Tho of'1,,nr ,/ 1 „, School Mitigation Fee Justification

Study

Prepared for:

Manteca Unified School District

Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)

March 2017

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

400 Capitol Mall, 28th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

916 649 8010 tel

916 649 2070 fax

Oakland

Sacramento

Denver

Los Angeles

EPS #152121

www.epsys.com

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

Purpose of the Report 1

District Background 1

Nexus Evaluation 1

Recommended District Fees 2

Discussion of Sections of this Report 2

2. INTRODUCTION 4

Background 4

3. PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT 5

Total Square Footage of New Residential Development 5

4. SCHOOL FACILITY NEEDS 7

Unhoused Students from New Development 7

Consider Local Resources 10

Determination of Unhoused Students from New Development 11

Funded Capacity 12

5. STATE GRANT CALCULATION 14

Site Acquisition Costs 14

Site Development Costs 16

Total State Grants 16

6. LEVEL 1 FEE CALCULATION 18

Level 1 Fee Calculation 18

Other New Construction Funding Sources 20

7. NONRESIDENTIAL AND SENIOR HOUSING FEES 21

Nonresidential Impacts 21

Senior Housing Fee Impacts 23

8. ADOPTION PROCESS FOR STATUTORY FEES 26

9. NEXUS LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND FINDINGS 27

Nexus Legislative Requirements 27

Nexus Findings 28

Further Discussion 28

Appendices:

Appendix A: School Facility Enrollment and Capacity

Appendix B: Proposed Residential Developments in the District

Appendix C: Fund 25 Funding Capacity

Appendix D: State Grant Calculation Worksheets

Appendix E: Census and Household Data

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of School Mitigation Fees 3

Table 2 New Residential Units 2010 to 2014 6

Table 3 Student Generation Rates 8

Table 4 Student Generation Rates for Single-Family and Multifamily Residential Units 8

Table 5 Projected New Students from Proposed Residential Units 9

Table 6 Summary of School District Capacity 10

Table 7 Summary of Projected Unhoused Students 13

Table 8 Unhoused Student Facility Construction State Grant Amounts 14

Table 9 Unhoused State Grant Amounts for Site Acquisition 15

Table 10 Unhoused State Grant Amounts for Site Development 16

Table 11 Total State Grants 17

Table 12 School Facility Costs for Unhoused Students 18

Table 13 Projected Development Square Footage 19

Table 14 Calculation of Justified Fee 19

Table 15 Level 1 Fee Justification 20

Table 16 Nonresidential Fee Justification 22

Table 17 Senior Housing School Mitigation Fee Justification 24

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose of the Report

This School Mitigation Fee Justification Study (Study) is an update to previous reports used by

the Manteca Unified School District (District) to adopt Level 1 fees for residential, nonresidential,

and senior housing uses in 2014.

District Background

The capacity for the District is based on Education Code (EC) 17071.10 (including the "year-

round" capacity penalty for districts not on multiple-track year-round schedules). A description

of the methodology used to determine the District's current capacity is included in Section 4.

Using this measure of school capacity for schools in operation, the District has a capacity for

15,649 students at K-8 grade levels, 7,424 students at 9-12 grade levels, and 462 special

education students. The calculation of net capacity indicates that no capacity exists for students

generated from new development.

On February 24, 2016, the State Allocation Board (SAB) increased the Level 1 fee cap for

residential development to $3.48 per square foot and increased the cap for nonresidential

development and age-restricted senior housing to $0.56 per square foot. Also on February 24,

2016, the SAB adopted increased State School Facilities Program Grant amounts. The District is

eligible to assess updated development impact fees authorized under EC Section 17620 and

Government Code (GC) Section 65995.

Nexus Evaluation

To determine the number of students expected to be generated by residential development, the

student database from the District was compared to County Assessor records for the Fiscal Year

2016-17 secured property tax roll. During the previous 5 years (2010 through 2014) 2,193 new

single-family units and 153 new multifamily units were built and occupied. This information is

analyzed to determine estimated average building square footage for single-family residential

and multifamily residential. The average building square footage is applied to estimated future

units to provide the denominator for calculating the estimated cost per building square foot for

the school fee justification analysis.

For the purposes of this analysis, EPS reviewed the planned residential projects proposed for the

cities of Manteca, Lathrop, and Stockton, and the unincorporated area of San Joaquin County

(County) to determine the number of residential units needing access to school facilities. There

are approximately 14,187 residential units proposed to be constructed within the boundaries of

the District (see Appendix B for detail).

Each new single-family residential unit to be constructed in the District is estimated to average

2,245 square feet and to generate 0.610 K-12 students. Each new multifamily residential unit to

be constructed in the District is estimated to average 1,102 square feet and to generate

0.608 K-12 students.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1

School Mitigation Fee Justification Study

Final Draft Report March 2017

Recommended District Fees

This section identifies justifiable Level 1 fees for residential, nonresidential, and senior housing.

A summary of the fees is shown in Table 1.

Residential

Based on determinations consistent with GC 65995(b), the District is justified in adopting a

Level 1 fee of $3.48 per square foot of assessable space of residential construction.

Nonresidential and Senior Housing

The District is eligible to assess fees on nonresidential development up to the statutory limit of

$0.56 per square foot (except for self-storage units, which may be assessed up to $0.26 per

square foot). The District is eligible to assess fees on age-restricted senior housing of $0.29 per

square foot.

Discussion of Sections of this Report

This report is divided into 10 chapters, including this Executive Summary. Chapter 2 provides

an introduction. Chapter 3 discusses projected development. Chapter 4 discusses the school

facilities needs. Chapter 5 provides the calculation of state grants. Chapter 6 discusses the

calculation of the Level 1 Fee. Chapter 7 provides the calculation of Level 1 fees for

nonresidential and age-restricted senior housing. Chapter 8 outlines the Level 1 fee adoption

process. Chapter 9 provides the nexus legislative requirements. The appendices provide

supporting information and documents for this report.


School Mitigation Fee Justification Study Final Draft Report March 2017

Table 1 Summary of School Mitigation Fees

Type of Development Statutory

Fee Recommended

Fees per SF

Statutory Fees

Level 1

Residential [1] $3.48 $3.48 Retail [2] $0.56 $0.56 Office [2] $0.56 $0.56 Industrial [2] $0.56 $0.56 Warehouse [2] $0.56 $0.56 Self Storage [2] $0.56 $0.26 Senior Housing [3] $0.56 $0.29

"summary"

[1] From Table 15. [2] From Table 16. [3] From Table 17.


2. INTRODUCTION

Background

EC 17620 gives school districts the authority to collect development mitigation fees pursuant to

GC 65995 et. seq. Generally, the school facility industry refers to the three levels of fees as

Level 1 statutory fees and Level 2 and Level 3 alternative school facility fees. Level 1 fees are

assessed on residential, nonresidential, and age-restricted senior housing

EC 17620 grants school district-governing boards the authority to impose Level 1 Fees, up to a

specified limit, on new residential and commercial/industrial development to pay for school

facilities. Currently, the maximum fee that can be levied (the Level 1 fee or statutory fee) is

$3.48 per square foot for new residential development and $0.56 per square foot for

nonresidential (commercial and industrial) development and age-restricted senior housing (see

Chapter 8)


3. PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT

As outlined in Chapter 2, the need for new school facilities created by unhoused pupils from new

residential development involves several calculations. The need for new school facilities through

build out of the District, converted to a dollar amount, is divided by the total square footage of

new residential development, which results in a per-square-foot Level 1 fee recommendation.

This chapter takes a step-by-step approach to these various calculations to derive the alternative

school fees for the District.

Total Square Footage of New Residential

Development

The denominator in the basic equation requires an estimation of the total square footage of new

residential development projected to be built in the District. This estimation involves two

calculations. For the first calculation, a determination of the total number of new residential

units to be constructed in the District must be made. The second calculation involves

establishing an average square-footage size of residential units. Multiplying these two

calculations provides the denominator in the basic equation.

Total New Residential Units

The District has identified all residential development projects and developed an estimate of the

number of residential units that could be constructed. The development projects may have

approved final maps, tentative maps, master plans, or specific plans. There are a total of

14,187 identified residential units. A detailed list is shown in Appendix B.

Average Size of New Residential Units

Based on building permit data collected by the District for homes built during the last 5 years,

the average size of future single-family units will be 2,245 square feet and future multifamily

units will be 1,102 square feet. See Table 2 for detail.



Table 2 New Residential Units 2010 to 2014

Calendar Year

Single- Family Units [1]

Total Square Footage

Multifamily Units [1]

Total Square Footage

2010 558 1,021,059 0 0 2011 328 746,456 153 168,666 2012 446 943,146 0 0 2013 428 1,045,933 0 0 2014 370 1,024,639 0 0

Total 2,130 153

Average 426 2,245 31 1,102

Percent of Total 93% 7%

"new units"

Sources: Manteca USD and San Joaquin County Assessor

[1] From Manteca USD permit and fee records.


4. SCHOOL FACILITY NEEDS

Multiple calculations and adjustments are required when determining the need for new school

facilities. Generally, the formula involves calculating the estimated facility construction costs,

the site development costs, and the site acquisition costs.

Unhoused Students from New Development

The Study will project the number of unhoused elementary, middle, and high school pupils

generated by new residential units in each category of pupils enrolled in a school district. This

projection of unhoused pupils is based on student generation rates of existing residential

development throughout the District. Student enrollment records were matched with San

Joaquin County Assessor's records to identify students coming from existing development within

the school district boundaries. Students coming from existing development outside of district

boundaries are excluded from the calculation of student generation rates. Not all enrollment

records could be matched with valid addresses contained in County Assessor's data. Efforts were

made to try to validate addresses and match them with the appropriate property records.

Although GC 65995.6(g) defines "type" of residence as single-family detached, single-family

attached, manufactured and mobile homes, condominiums, and multifamily housing units, this

report only uses the single-family and multifamily designations because the number of other

units is statistically insignificant. This report calculates the student generation rates for each

type of unit and multiplies it by the projected residential housing units of these two types.

Student Generation Rates

The student database from the District was compared to County Assessor records for the Fiscal

Year 2016-17 secured property tax roll. Table 3 shows the detailed calculation for the student

generation rates by grade level. While the District intends to build K-8 and high school facilities

for new students, Table 3 shows the number of students from new housing attending

elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. This information is used later in the

analysis to determine state grant funding by grade level for new school facilities.



Table 3 Student Generation Rates

Housing

Type

Residential Units

Number of Students Student Generation Rates K-12 K-6 7-8 9-12 K-6 7-8 9-12

Single Family Detached 30,528 10,274 3,070 6,417 0.337 0.101 0.210 0.647

Condominium 1,615 225 36 109 0.007 0.001 0.004 0.229 Mobile home 1,554 171 36 85 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.188 Duplex/Halfplex 241 702 221 262 0.023 0.007 0.009 4.917 Triplex/Fourplex 888 207 53 79 0.007 0.002 0.003 0.382 Apartments 2,829 613 137 283 0.020 0.004 0.009 0.365

Totals 37,655 12,192 3,553 7,235 0.324 0.094 0.192 0.610

"sgrcalc"

Sources: ESRI. Manteca Unified School District, and EPS.

Student generation rates were further refined to calculate the students per household for single

family and multifamily residential uses. While the District builds K-8 school facilities, state

grants vary for K-6 and 7-8 school facilities, so it is necessary to identify student generation

rates for elementary and middle school facilities. Table 4 shows the calculation of these student

generations rates for these facility types.

Table 4 Student Generation Rates for Single-Family and Multifamily Residential Units

Grade Level Residential Land Use K-6 7-8 9-12 K-12

Students From Single-Family 10,670 3,142 6,611 20,423 From Multifamily 1,522 411 624 2,557

Totals 12,192 3,553 7,235 22,980

Housing Units Single-Family 33,697 33,697 33,697 33,697 Multifamily 3,958 3,958 3,958 3,958 Totals 37,655 37,655 37,655 37,655

Single-Family Units 0.317 0.093 0.196 0.606

Multifamily Units 0.385 0.104 0.158 0.646

All Residential Units 0.324 0.094 0.192 0.610

"SGRs"

Sources: ESRI, Manteca Unified School District, and EPS.




Projected New Students

The student generation rates are used to determine the number of students that may come from

new development through build out of the developable areas of the District. These projected

numbers of students will be used later in the analysis to calculate state grant revenues that could

be available to the District. These student projections are also used to determine the facility

requirements needed to house these students and to develop costs of new facilities. See

Table 5. The District has identified all proposed residential development projects. These

projects are shown in Table B-1.

Table 5 Projected New Students from Proposed Residential Units

Description Units SGR Students [1] [2]

Projected Single-Family Units 12,696 0.606 7,695

Projected Multifamily Units 1,491 0.646 963

Tota Is 14,187 8,658

"new students"

[1] From Table 7.

[2] From Table 4.

Housing of Projected New Students

In considering the housing of new students, the Study analyzes the following areas to determine

if the school district can house new students in current facilities or with monies currently

available to construct new classrooms:

1. Identify and consider any surplus property owned by the school district that can be used as a

school site or is available for sale to finance school facilities.

2. Identify and consider the extent to which projected enrollment growth may be

accommodated by excess capacity in existing facilities.

3. Identify and consider local sources, other than fees, charges, dedications, or other

requirements imposed on residential construction, available to finance construction or

reconstruction of school facilities needed to accommodate any growth in enrollment

attributable to the construction of residential units.




Consider Local Resources

Surplus Property

The District has certified five school sites as unused. One of these sites, North Manteca (Union

Ranch), was purchased with Fund 25 (Development Impact Fees) and Fund 21 (Measure M

GO Bonds) revenues. If this site were to be sold, a portion of the proceeds would be returned to

Fund 25 and would be available for new school construction and other authorized uses of

development impact fees. This is discussed further in Chapter 6.

Excess Capacity

Table 6 shows the calculation of existing capacity and compares it to current District enrollment.

The base capacity of 24,167 shown is from Appendix A. Base capacity was provided by the

District. Base capacity is based upon state guidelines for the number of students per classroom

at various grade levels. The actual class loading may differ based upon District policies and

needs.

The 2015 California Basics Education Data System (CBEDS) enrollment was based upon

information provided by the District to the California Department of Education. The 2015-16

enrollment was 23,204. When comparing the base capacity to 2015-16 enrollment, the District

has some existing capacity to accommodate students coming from future growth.

The calculation of excess capacity does not take into consideration relocatable classrooms leased

from the State or portable classrooms leased for fewer than 5 years.

Table 6 Summary of School District Capacity

Description K-6 7-8 9-12 K-12

Base Capacity [1] 12,132 3,924 8,111 24,167

2015 CBEDS Enrollment [2] 12,218 3,521 7,465 23,204

Excess/(Shortfall) (86) 403 646 963

Available Capacity (86) 403 646 963

"capacity"

Sources: Manteca USD, California Basic Education Data System (CBEDS), and the State Allocation Board.

[1] Provided by MUSD.

[2] From the December 2015 CBEDS enrollment.




Capacity Funded by Existing Development

Existing development has been required to pay the current development impact fee amount per

square foot of development. These funds are placed in Fund 25 as the local match for State

grants for new school facility construction.

Determination of Unhoused Students from New

Development

In order to identify the capacity at the District's current facilities to house students projected to

be generated by residential development the District must determine the capacity of their

current facilities. For the purposes of this Report the District has utilized the methodology

outlined in Education Code Section 17071. The following is a simplified explanation of the

methodology utilized.

Each school district that elected to participate in the State's new construction funding program

was required to determine an initial Baseline Capacity. In the District's case this determination

was made in 2016. The Baseline Capacity is made up of two components:

Permanent Classrooms - The school district identifies each permanent teaching station and

applies the State mandated loading standard of 25 students in grades kindergarten - 6th and

27 students in grades 7th - 12th.

Relocatable Classrooms - The school district identifies each relocatable teaching station

and applies the State mandated loading standard of 25 students in grades kindergarten - 6th

and 27 students in grades 7th - 12th. However, portable teaching stations in excess of 25% of

the number of permanent teaching stations are not included in the calculation. This reflects

the desire of the State and school districts to keep the total number of relocatable

classrooms within reason.

School districts must adjust their capacity by adding any teaching stations purchased or

constructed after the establishment of the Baseline Capacity utilizing the same State mandated

loading standards. Appendix A shows the District's Baseline Capacity and subsequent

adjustments. The District's capacity calculated pursuant to Education Code Section 17071 may

not reflect the actual classroom utilization and educational programing of the District. Individual

classrooms may be loaded at different levels or utilized for academic support activities. Academic

support activities include music, art, computer and language labs, resource specialist rooms and

other pull-out classes.

The District estimates the base student capacity for all school facilities is 24,167 (See

Appendix A for detail). Based upon the 2015 CBEDS enrollment, the District has current excess

capacity of 963 students. Table 6 shows a total of 963 K-12 students of available capacity.

Table 5 showed that there are an estimated 8,658 new students coming from projected new

development. As such, there is existing capacity for some of these new students.




The 963 students are allocated to school grade and program areas based on the percentage of

students in each category or program to the total students shown in base capacity reports.

Table 7 shows the allocation of students in K-6, 7-8, and 9-12. Projected students from

Table 5 are shown, and using excess capacity determinations, the total unhoused students are

determined. The unhoused students are the 8,658 students that will not be housed in existing

schools with a total excess capacity of 963. There are a projected 7,258 unhoused students

coming from new development through build out.

Funded Capacity

Fund balances in Fund 25 are mitigation fees from new development for which new school

facilities are planned but not yet constructed. As of January 1, 2017 there was a fund balance of

$20,566,452. Using the assumed cost per student to fund the cost of constructing new K-8 and

9-12 facilities, this balance is converted into per student "funded capacity" in Table 7 and used

to reduce the total number of unhouses students. The 7,258 unhoused students in Table 7

includes the reduction for funded capacity. See Appendix C for detail calculations of the funded

capacity.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12 e: e


Table 7 Summary of Projected Unhoused Students

Single-Family Multifamily

Description K-6 7-8 9-12 K-6 7-8 9-12

Projected Units [1] 12,696 1,491

Student Generation Rate [2] 0.317 0.093 0.196 0.385 0.104 0.158

Projected Students 4,020 1,184 2,491 573 155 235

Available Capacity (86) 403 646 0 0 0

Funded Capacity [3] (339) 0 (98)

Unhoused Students 3,767 781 1,747 573 155 235

Total K-6 Unhoused Students 4,340

Total 7-8 Unhoused Students 936

Total 9-12 Unhoused Students 1,982

Total Unhoused Students - K-12 7,258

"unhoused"

[1] Approximately 89 percent of the residential units in the District are single family units

The 14,187 residential units shown in Table 5 are allocating using the ration of single

family to multifamily for the remaining residential units to be built in the District.

[2] From Table 4.

[3] Development impact fees collected for school facility construction that have not been

expended to date are converted to school capacity equivalents to reduce the calculation of unhoused students coming from future new development. See Appendix C for

the calculation of school capacity equivalents.


5. STATE GRANT CALCULATION

At the time of this report it is uncertain whether or not the District will receive or be eligible for

state grants that are intended to partially fund new school facilities required to house new

students. The determination of the eligibility for imposition of Level 1 Fees requires that this

report assume that such grants are available for the District

The 7,258 unhoused students shown in Table 7 are used to determine the amount of such state

grants for per student grants for facility construction, for site acquisition, and for site

development.

Unhoused Student State Grant Amounts

Table 8 shows the unhoused student State grant calculation. These amounts were established

by using the base grants established by the SAB in accordance with EC 17072.10(a) and (b).

The amounts also include the increase to the base grant for fire alarm and sprinkler systems and

for labor compliance. Table D-1 shows the calculation used to blend special education funding

with regular education funding to determine the grant amounts used in Table 8.

Table 8 Unhoused Student Facility Construction State Grant Amounts

Description K-6 Facility Type

9-12 Totals 7-8

Unhoused Students 4,340 936 1,982 7,258

State Grant per Student [1] $11,387 $12,024 $15,036

Total State Grants $49,419,119 $11,249,869 $29,801,496 $90,470,484

"costs"

[1] State grants include amounts pursuant to EC 17072.10, plus allowable adjustments. See Table D-1 for detail.

Site Acquisition Costs

Based on the number of unhoused students from Table 7, the District would need to acquire a

total of 105.51 acres for a K-8 school site and 66.07 acres for a 9-12 school site. The District

currently owns 46.9 acres designated for K-8 sites and 50 acres designated for a 9-12 school

facility. The District would need to acquire an additional 58.61 for new K-8 school facilities. The

District would need to acquire an additional 16.07 acres for the 9-12 campus to house new 9-12

students. Table 9 shows the estimated State funding for a 9-12 school site acquisition. See

Appendix D for a summary of state grant amounts.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14 ,„„,.,,

Table 9 Unhoused State Grant Amounts for Site Acquisition


Facility Type Description K-8 9-12

Unhoused Students 5,276 1,982

Students per School [1] 1,000 1,500

School Required 5.28 1.32

Standard Site Size (acres) [2] 20 50

Acres Required 105.51 66.07

Site Acreage Owned by the District [3] 46.90 50.00

Acreage Required to be Acquired 58.61 16.07

One-Half of Site Acquisition Costs per Acre [4] $175,000 $175,000

Total State Site Acquisition Grants $10,257,233 $2,811,667

"site_acq"

Source: Manteca Unified School District and EPS.

[1] Typical school sizes for the purposes of calculating grants. Actual school sizes may vary.

[2] Gross acres required includes the Department of Education net acreage recommendations

plus 10 percent for land lost to streets and other dedications.

[3] From Certification of Unused Sites for the District dated May 23, 2016. Allocated to

each facility type based on demand.

[4] Based on recent school site acquisitions in the region.




Site Development Costs

Based on the site development costs for recently completed schools in the region, Table 10

shows the estimated State funding for one-half of the site development costs. State funding

includes the estimated site development costs, as well as general site grants.

Table 10 Unhoused State Grant Amounts for Site Development

Description

Facility Type K-8 9-12

Site Development Grant

Acres Required (From Table 8) a 105.51 52.85

One-half of Site Development Costs per Acre [1] b $105,000 $105,000

Per-acre Grant for General Site Improvements c $14,808 $14,808

Total Grant for Site Development d =b +c $119,808 $119,808

Subtotal (Per-Acre Grants) e=a •d $12,641,273 $6,332,252

Per Student Site Development Grant

Unhoused Students from New Development f 5,276 1,982

Per-Student Grant for General Site Improvements g $510 $575

Subtotal (Per-Student Grants) h =f *g $2,690,575 $1,139,650

Total State Site Development Grants =e+ h $15,331,848 $7,471,902

"site_dev"

Source: District, Office of Public School Construction.

[1] Provided by California Financial Services.

Total State Grants

Table 11 shows total state grants. This is the sum of the facility construction cost grants, site

acquisition costs, and site development costs. These grants will be used to reduce the total

estimated construction cost of new facilities required to house all new unhoused students.


Table 11 Total State Grants


Facility Type Description K-8 9-12

Total State Grants [1] $60,668,988 $29,801,496

Total State Site Acquisition Costs [2] $10,257,233 $2,811,667

Total State Site Development Costs [3] $15,331,848 $7,471,902

Total State Grants $86,258,069 $40,085,065

Grand Total State Grants $126,343,134

"state costs"

[1] From Table 8.

[2] From Table 9.

[3[ From Table 10.


6. LEVEL 1 FEE CALCULATION

In this chapter, the justified Level 1 fee will be determined, thereby providing support for the

imposition of a Level 1 fee for new development in the District.

Level 1 Fee Calculation

Table 12 shows the total estimated costs of facility construction required to house students

coming from new development. Table 13 shows the calculation of square footage of projected

development. Table 14 shows the calculation of the justified fee for single-family and

multifamily units, which is based on State grants. Table 15 shows that Level 1 fees of $3.48 are

justified for the District for single-family and multifamily residential development.

Table 12 School Facility Costs for Unhoused Students

School Facilities Costs School Facility Capacity 1,000 1,500

Unhoused Students 5,276 1,982 School Facility Requirements for Unhoused Students 5.28 1.32

Per Student School Facility Costs [1] $47,725 $73,306

School Facility Costs for Unhoused Students $251,781,159 $145,292,969 $397,074,128

Credit for Current School Sites Owned Acres of Land Owned by District [2] 46.90 50.00

Assumed Cost per Acre [1] $250,000 $250,000

Credit for Owned Land $11,725,000 $12,500,000 $24,225,000

Adjusted Facility Costs for Unhoused Students $372,849,128

State Grants Unhoused Student Grant [3] $60,668,988 $29, 801,496 Site Acquisition Grant [2] $10,257,233 $2,811,667 Site Development Grant [4] $15,331,848 $7,471,902 Total State Grants $86,258,069 $40,085,065 $126,343,134

Net Costs for New School Facilities for New Development $270,730,994

"fac_costs"


[2] From Table 9.

[3] From Table 8.

[4] From Table 10.



Table 13 Projected Development Square Footage

Description Single-Family Multifamily

Projected Units through Buildout [1] 12,696 1,491

Estimated Average Size per Unit (sq. ft.) [2] 2,245 1,102

Subtotals (sq. ft.) 28,498,333 1,643,917

Total Development (sq. ft.) 30,142,250

"proj_sqft"

Source: Manteca USD, City of Manteca, and EPS.

[1] From Appendix B.

[2] Based on the records of the District from 2010 to 2014.

Table 14 Calculation of Justified Fee

Description Amount

Total Facility Costs [1] $372,849,128

Less State Grants [2] ($126, 343,134)

Total Facility Costs for Unhoused Students $246,505,994

Total Development (sq. ft.) [3] 30,142,250

Justified Fee ($/sq. ft.) $8.18

'justified fee"

[1] From Table 12.

[2] From Table 11.

[3] From Table 13.




Table 15 Level 1 Fee Justification

Description Amount

Justified Fee $8.18

Level 1 Fee $3.48

Justified Level 1 Fee $3.48

"leyell_fee"

Other New Construction Funding Sources

The District has formed four Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) on new

development that has occurred in Manteca, Lathrop, and Stockton. Revenues and CFD bond

proceeds have been used to supplement developer impact fees and State grants in the

construction of new schools serving these communities. The Level 1 fee and State grants do not

fully fund the costs of constructing new schools, so the CFDs are used to augment these funding

sources and are not intended to replace either of these two funding sources.


7. NONRESIDENTIAL AND SENIOR HOUSING FEES

Nonresidential Impacts

New retail, office, industrial, and warehouse development creates new jobs and increases the

demand for housing. Some new employees will move into existing housing, others into new

housing, and others into housing in other school districts. As new households move into the

District, the schools are directly impacted by the additional students added by these households.

The impact of new students generated by new housing is mitigated by the residential school

impact fee.

For the existing housing base, the impact on the District occurs when a new household with

school-aged children moves into the District. A new household with school-aged children that

replaces an existing household without school-aged children affects the District in the same way

as a new household with children moving into a new home: the District is impacted by the new

students. For existing homes, this is an impact that is not covered by residential development

impact fees because these fees are charged only on new homes. A nonresidential development

impact fee will help mitigate the impact of these new households.

Table 16 shows the school facility impact calculation for each nonresidential land use category.

Appendix E provides backup census and housing projection data used in the calculation. The

cost impact per 1,000 building square feet is based on the number of employees generated by

1,000 square feet of new nonresidential development and the subsequent number of new

households with school-aged children moving into existing homes without school-aged children.

This number of new households is multiplied by the facility costs caused by a new household to

arrive at the school facilities cost attributable to each 1,000 square feet of commercial

development. The cost per 1,000 square feet for each nonresidential land use is converted to a

cost per square foot.

The SAB established the K-12 nonresidential development fee limit at $0.56 per square foot of

nonresidential building area. Fees can be collected up to this limit if they can be justified by the

nexus requirements. The calculated K-12 impact of new nonresidential development exceeds the

statutory limit of $0.56 per square foot for all nonresidential development, except self-storage

units, which cannot exceed $0.26 per square foot.



Table 16 Nonresidential Fee Justification

Description Office Retail Industrial Warehouse Self

Storage

Square Fee per Employee [1] a 300 500 750 1,400 15,500

Employees per 1,000 Sq. Ft. b = 1,000 /a 3.33 2.00 1.33 0.71 0.06

Percentage of Employees Forming Households [2] 62% 62% 62% 62% 62%

Households per 1,000 Sq. Ft. d = b * c 2.06 1.24 0.82 0.44 0.04

Share of Households Moving into New Housing [3] e 21% 21% 21% 21% 21%

Share of Households Moving into Existing Housing [3] f= 1 -e 79% 79% 79% 79% 79%

Households Moving in Exisiting Housing per 1,000 sq. ft. g=d*f 1.63 0.98 0.65 0.35 0.03

Share of Households with School Age Children Moving into Existing Housing and Replacing Households with no Children in the District [2]

h 24% 24% 24% 24% 24%

Households Moving into Existing Housing and Adding 1= g * h 0.39 0.23 0.16 0.08 0.01

Children to the District per 1,000 sq. ft.

School Facilities Costs per Dwelling Unit [4] j $34,041 $34,041 $34,041 $34,041 $34,041

School Facilities Costs Assigned to 1,000 Sq. Ft. per Dwelling Unit

k =1 *j $13,293 $7,976 $5,317 $2,849 $257

Cost per Sq. Ft. i =k/1,000 $13.29 $7.98 $5.32 $2.85 $0.26

Maximum School Mitigation Fee per Sq. Ft. m $0.56 $0.56 $0.56 $0.56 $0.56

Surplus/(Shortfall) per Sq. Ft. n = m - 1 ($12.73) ($7.42) ($4.76) ($2.29) $0.30

Recommended Fee $0.56 $0.56 $0.56 $0.56 $0.26

"nonres fee"

[1] Source: San Diego Traffic Generators, 1990 (SANDAG) and EPS.

[2] See Table E-1 for detail.

[3] See Table E-2 for detail.

[4] Based on total single-family costs from Table D-2.




Senior Housing Fee Impacts

Age-restricted senior housing projects require residents to be 55 years old or older; therefore,

school-aged children will not be generated directly by these projects. Senior projects, however,

do cause an increase in the need for support services, such as retail, travel, banking, healthcare,

and entertainment. Additional workers come to the project to fill the jobs provided by the

increased support services. The workers bring with them school-aged children. As with

nonresidential projects, it can be stated that the senior housing project indirectly impacts school

facilities. By law, development impact fees are limited to the maximum nonresidential fee as

long as they are justified by nexus requirements.

This impact may not occur immediately after construction of the senior units. As the senior

community builds out, the need for the support services will occur over time. Because there is

no ability to collect the fee at the time the school impact occurs after senior housing

construction, the impact fee is being estimated before development and will be collected at the

time the unit is constructed.

Table 17 shows the justification for the senior housing fee for school facilities. Appendix E

includes supporting census and housing projection data used in the calculation. As mentioned

above, senior housing generates the need for more services, which are filled by new employees.

The senior housing impact is calculated by estimating the number of new jobs generated by one

senior housing unit, then the subsequent number of new local households with school-aged

children replacing existing households without school-aged children. This number of new

households is multiplied by the facility costs caused by a new household to arrive at the school

facilities cost caused by one new senior housing unit. This cost is converted to a cost per square

foot.

The number of jobs generated by one senior housing unit on which this calculation was based

was estimated by the relative per-capita expenditures as a percentage of income in a variety of

retail/service industries for the State. The number of jobs generated by one senior housing unit

on which this calculation was based was estimated using data from the Consumer Expenditure

Survey from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Economic Census from the

United States Census. The Consumer Expenditure Survey provides data for households at a

variety of income levels, detailing the amounts that typical households spend on things like

"Food at Home," "Apparel and Services," and "Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs." The

household's typical expenditures were converted to the number of jobs created by their

spending. The first step in this process is to determine how much of an industry's gross receipts

are used to pay wages and employee compensation. EPS relied on data from the Economic

Census,1 which provides employment, gross sales, and payroll data by industry for the Manteca

area. In certain instances, Manteca area data were not available for every Economic Census

industry—in those cases, EPS relied on statewide Economic Census data for that industry.

1 Note that the Consumer Expenditure Survey data is based on information current as of 2010. The

latest data available for the Economic Census was published in 2007. Because these data sources are

from different years, EPS converted the 2010 expenditures to 2007 dollars using the Consumer Price

Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) from the Bureau of Labor

Statistics.



Table 17 Senior Housing School Mitigation Fee Justification

Per Senior Housing

Description

Unit

Direct Employees Generated per New Unit [1] a 0.17

Share of Employees in Local Area [2] b 25%

Percentage of Employees Forming Head of Households [2] c 62%

New Households per Senior Housing Unit d =a *b `c 0.03

Share of Households Moving Into New Housing [3] e 21%

Share of Households Moving into Existing Housing [3] f= 1 - e 79%

New Households Moving into Existing Housing per Senior Housing Unit g = d • f 0.021

Share of Households with School Age Children Moving h 41% into Existing Housing and Replacing Households with no Children in the District [2]

Households Moving into Existing Housing and Adding I = h *g 0.008 Children to the District per Senior Housing Unit

School Facilities Costs per Dwelling Unit [4] j $34,041

School Facilities Cost Caused by Senior Housing Unit k =i `j $288

Cost per 1,000 Sq. Ft. of Senior Housing / = k /1,000 $0.29

Maximum School Mitigation Fee per Sq. Ft. m $0.56

Surplus/(Shortfall) per Sq. Ft. n = m - I $0.27

Recommended Fee $0.29

"senior fee"

[1] From Table E-3.

[2] From Table E-1.

[3] From Table E-2.

[4] From Table D-2.




To link the Economic Census data and the Consumer Expenditure Survey data, EPS made

determinations as to the industries involved with expenditures in various categories. For

example, purchases in the Consumer Expenditure Survey's "Food at Home" category likely would

involve the Economic Census' "Food & Beverage Stores" industry. By contrast, purchases in the

Consumer Expenditure Survey's "Entertainment Fees and Admissions" category were attributed

to the Economic Census' "Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation" industry. Where more than one

Economic Census category was attributable to a Consumer Expenditure Survey category, EPS

estimated the proportion of expenditures associated with each Economic Census category.

It is important to note that the nonresidential fee does not pay for all of the nonresidential

impact and has left a shortfall. This gap could, in part, be lessened by a fee imposed on senior

housing. The calculated impact for age-restricted senior housing is less than the maximum

allowable fee of $0.56 per square foot; therefore, the District is justified in assessing up to

$0.29 per square foot on age-restricted senior housing development, based on the calculations

shown in Table 17.


8. ADOPTION PROCESS FOR STATUTORY FEES

It is recommended that the District's governing board, subject to meeting all applicable legal

requirements, establish fees for residential, nonresidential, and senior housing projects by

resolution at a public hearing after this STUDY has been made available to the public for at least

10 days and advertised twice in a newspaper of general circulation during each of the 2 weeks

before the public hearing.

GC 66016 requires that the public have the opportunity to review and comment on "data

indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fee

or service charge is levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service."

The statutory residential, nonresidential, and senior housing fees will become effective 60 days

after adoption of the fees by resolution. The next scheduled increase in the cap on Level 1

residential, nonresidential, and age-restricted senior housing fees is scheduled for January 2018.


9. NEXUS LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND FINDINGS

Nexus Legislative Requirements

This report establishes eligibility and justification to assess alternative school fees and

nonresidential and senior housing fees pursuant to EC 17620 et. seq., GC 65995 et. seq., and

the provisions of GC 66000 et. seq. These sections, among other things, grant school district-

governing boards the authority to impose development fees, up to a specified limit, on new

development to pay for school facilities.

GC 65995.6 describes the calculation of the nexus between enrollment growth from new

residential development and the need for new facilities. In part it states:

The school facilities needs analysis ... shall be conducted by the governing board

of a school district to determine the need for new school facilities for unhoused

pupils that are attributable to projected enrollment growth from the development

of new residential units over the next 5 years.

Assembly Bill 1600, which created GC 66000 et. seq., sets forth the procedural requirements for

establishing and collecting development impact fees. These procedures require that

"a reasonable relationship or nexus must exist between a governmental exaction and the

purpose of the condition." Specifically, each public agency imposing a fee must make these

findings:

• Identify the purpose of the fee.

• Identify how the fee is to be used.

• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee's use and the type of

development project on which the fee is imposed.

• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the need for the public facility and

the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the

public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee

is imposed.

GC 65995.5(f) requires that such fees be "expended solely on the school facilities identified in

the needs analysis as being attributable to projected enrollment growth from the construction of

new residential units." GC 65995(g)(3) permits fees from nonresidential and senior housing

projects to be expended on "any school-related considerations relating to a school district's

ability to accommodate enrollment."




Nexus Findings

The District must make these specific findings:

• The purpose of the school fee is to provide school facilities for students generated by new

development in the District. The fee will be used to fund elementary facilities for K-12

students for which there is no other reasonable funding source.

• The District will use the alternative fees to expand existing schools or construct new schools

necessary to provide adequate school facilities for students from new development.

• Development of new residential land uses in the District will generate additional K-8 students

and the need for school facilities to house them. Because current K-8 school facilities are

overcapacity, based on State standards, new facilities must be constructed. The fees will be

used to fund new development's pro rata share of necessary school facilities.

• New residential development through buildout will result in the direct increase of K-12

students to be served by the District. Because the District does not have current capacity to

serve all additional students adequately, new school facilities must be constructed to serve

future additional students.

• As shown in this STUDY, the amount of development impact fees is based on the State

formula for mitigating the impacts of new development.

• The District may use revenue from some or all of the following sources to provide school and

support facilities in the District:

— State Funding.

School Mitigation Agreements.

Statutory and Alternative School Fees.

Nonresidential and Senior Housing Fees.

Mello-Roos CFDs.

— GO Bonds.

Further Discussion

The study does not anticipate substantial infill development or redevelopment. Thus, the study

does not address a residential fee for reconstruction of buildings demolished for the purpose of

redevelopment.

Where commercial and industrial construction is concerned, the chargeable space does not

include the square footage of any existing structure on the site as of the date of the building

permit issued for new construction. If the developer pays the fee for the square footage of the

entire commercial or industrial structure, including the existing portion, a credit will be applied

for the square footage of the existing portion (EC 17620).

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 28 5.200. 52



A fee is not chargeable for reconstruction of existing structures destroyed as a result of a natural

disaster. The District may charge a fee for the square footage that exceeds the square footage

of the original, destroyed structure (EC 17626).

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 20,011521 2: S.:,

APPENDICES:

Appendix A:

Appendix B:

Appendix C:

Appendix D:

Appendix E:

School Facility Enrollment and

Capacity

Proposed Residential

Developments in the District

Fund 25 Funding Capacity

State Grant Calculation Worksheets

Census and Household Data

APPENDIX A:

School Facility Enrollment and Capacity

Table A-1 School Facility Enrollment and Capacity

State Application

NA

Item

Baseline Capacity (SAB Form 50-02)

Elementary School (Grades K-6)

7,825

Middle School (Grades 7-8)

1,458

High School

(Grades 9-12)

3,915

NA Non-Severe/Severe Capacity 137 25 72

50/68593-00-001 Great Valley Elementary 225 37 0

50/68593-00-002 Sierra High 0 0 270

50/68593-00-003 South Manteca Elementary 750 300 0

50/68593-00-004 [11 Woodward Ave/Airport Elementary 0 0 0

50/68593-00-005 East Union High 0 0 210

50/68593-00-006 McParland (George) Elementary 400 0 0

50/68593-00-007 Widmer 600 400 0

50/68593-00-008 [1] Rustic Elementary 0 0 0

50/68593-00-009 Weston Ranch High 0 0 783

50/68593-00-010 3rd Elementary School 600 441 0

50/68593-00-011 Veritas Elementary 95 804 0


50/68593-00-013 Manteca High Field High 0 0 0

50/68593-00-014 Great Valley Elementary Annex 525 0 0


50/68593-00-017 Mossdale Elementary 525 459 0

50/68593-00-018 Brockman (Stella) Elementary 450 0 0


50/68593-00-020 [21 Ethal Allen Elementary 0 0 0

50/68593-00-021

Total

Lathrop High School 0

12,132

0

3,924

1,566

8,111

[1] The School District has only received design funds for these projects. The facilities were never construction thus the capacity is not

counted in this calculation. The School District is in the process of returning the funding and rescinding these projects and restoring

the associated grants.

[2] The School District was apportioned funding for this project; however, never moved forward with the project and requested a

fund release. The timeline for requesting the fund release for this apportionment has passed. The facilities were never construction

thus the capacity is not counted in this calculation. The School District is the process of rescinding this project and restoring the

associated grants.

APPENDIX B:

Proposed Residential

Developments in the District

Table B-1 Proposed Residential Developments in the District

Table B-1 School Mitigation Fee Justification Proposed Residential Developments in the District

Project Status

Total Residential

Units

Building Permits Issued

Undeveloped Residential

Units

City of Manteca Alma Place Tract #3790 Tenative Map 184 0 184 Blossom Grove Tract #3436 (Part of Silva Estates) Final Map 93 8 85 Cerri Subdivision Tenative Map 643 0 643 Clearwater Creek Tract #3801 Final Map 35 35 0 Crivello Estates Tract #3487 Unit #1 Final Map 29 25 4 Denali Tract #3845 Tenative Map 315 0 315 Dolcinea Tenative Map 40 0 40 Dutra Estates Unit #5 Tract 3686 Final Map 49 2 47 Evans Estates Unit #2 (Phase I) Final Map 139 0 139 Griffin Park (Annexation) Annexation phase 1,571 0 1,571 Milner Terrace (Tract #3797) Annexation phase 76 0 76 Monte Bello Estates Tract #3867 Tenative Map 117 0 117 Oleander Estates Tract#3522 (phase 1) Final Map 195 6 189 Oleander Estates Tract#3522 (phase 2) Tenative Map 349 0 349 Oleander Estates Tract#3774 Final Map 113 31 82 Oleander Estates Unit #3 Tract #3842 (Phase 3) Final Map 121 0 121 Terra Bella Tract #3323 Final Map 158 150 8 Silva Estates Tenative Map 121 0 121 Terra Ranch Apartment Tenative Map 200 150 50 Tesoro Park Tract #3802 Recorded Map 25 22 3 The Trails Tenative Map 1,370 0 1,370 Woodbridge Apartments Tenative Map 128 0 128 Woodward Park I Tract #3777 Tenative Map 171 0 171 Villa Ticino West Tenative Map 708 0 708

Subtotal, City of Manteca 6,950 429 6,521

City of Lathrop RIVERPARK #7 TRACT #3410 Final Map 132 132 0 Mossdale Landing Tract #3338 Final Map 66 66 0 Mossdale Landing Tract #3490 Final Map 52 52 0 Lathrop Station ON HOLD 440 0 440 Central Lathrop Specific Plan Master Plan 6,790 0 6,790

Subtotal, City of Lathrop 7,480 250 7,230

San Joaquin County Oakwood Lake Tract #3475 Final Map 140 79 61 Oakwood Lake Tract #3476 Final Map 95 68 27 Oakwood Lake Tract #3477 Final Map 93 57 36 Oakwood Lake Tract #3478 Final Map 134 74 60

Subtotal, San Joaquin County 462 278 184

City of Stockton CORNERSTONE II UNIT #1 UNIT #1 ON HOLD 66 0 66 CORNERSTONE II UNIT #2 Tract 3406 ON HOLD 186 0 186

Subtotal, City of Stockton 252 0 252

Totals 15,144 957 14,187

"new dev"

Source: Manteca Unified School District

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 5 52 11520M 12,1.

APPENDIX C:

Fund 25 Funding Capacity

Appendix C

Table 1: Weighted Average Student Housing Cost

School Level Construction Cost Weighted Student

Per Student Generation Rate

Elementary School (K-8)

$41,545.25

0.4183

High School (9-12) $66,301.57 0.1920

Table 2: Allocation of Fund Balance

School Level Allocation of

Fund Balances

Funded

Capacity

339

98

437

Elementary School (K-8) $14,095,454.52

High School (9-12)

Total

$6,469,997.27

$20,565,451.79

Source: California Financial Services

APPENDIX D:

State Grant Calculation Worksheets

Table D-1

Table D-2

Table D-3

Per-Student Grant Calculation

Calculation of Cost per Student for School Facilities

Calculation of Students by Special Education and

Non-Special Education

Table D-1 School Mitigation Fee Justification Per Student Grant Calculation

State Grants (all categories) [1] K-6 7-8 9-12 Severe Non-Severe

Base Grant $10,634 $11,247 $14,311 $29,881 $19,984

Grant for Fire Alarms $12 $17 $29 $54 $37

Grant for Fire Sprinklers $178 $212 $220 $563 $378

Total Student Grants $10,824 $11,476 $14,560 $30,498 $20,399

Conversion to K-12 Grant Categories [2] K-6 7-8 9-12

K-12 Students [3] 97.2% $10,520 $11,154 $14,151 Severe Special Ed Students [3] 2.3% $716 $716 $716 Non-Severe Special Ed Students [3] 0.5% $94 $94 $94 Totals $11,330 $11,964 $14,961 Grant for Labor Compliance [4] 0.5% $57 $60 $75 Total per Student Grant $11,387 $12,024 $15,036

Assumed School Facility Capacity [5] 1,000 1,500 1,500 4,000 Weighted Average Total State Grant $2,869 $5,460 $5,460 $13,789

"grants"

[1] Grant amounts effective February 2016. [2] To estimate total state funding, special education grants need to be factored into the K-12 grade level categories [3] Percentages based on data for District (January 2008 SAB 50-01). [4] The Labor Compliance Grant is a sliding scale and the amount shown is a conservative estimate.

Source: Office of Public School Construction - February 2016

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 F .chveProlec1311520021152121 Manteca USD 2016 Fee Jus[N1,ca0on 31606,41odels,152111 neeei 3

Table D-2 School Mitigation Fee Justification Calculation of Cost per Student for School Facilities

School Facility Description K-8 9-12

Students per Site [1] 1,000 1,500 Construction Cost per Student [2] $47,725 $73,306 Construction Cost per New School $47,725,254 $109,959,361

Student Generation Rate 0.418 0.192

Cost per Dwelling Unit $19,956 $14,085

Total Cost per Dwelling Unit $34,041

"cost"

[1] Typical school site sizes used to determine Cost per Student.


Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 F Ache Project 152000,152121 Marrteca 2016 Fee ,Jusrorrucat,op StudyMecers,t52,2, recce:

Table D-3 School Mitigation Fee Justification Calculation of Students by Special Education and Non-Special Education

Grade Level Total % of

Students Total [1]

Special Education Non Special

Education Severe Non-Severe

Disability Disability [1] [1]

K-6 12,218 78% 308 47 11,863 7-8 3,521 22% 89 13 3,419

Total K-8 15,739 100% 397 60 15,282

9-12 7,465 148 47 7,270 Totals 23,204 545 107 22,552

Percentage of Total 2.3% 0.5% 97.2%

"student cat"

[1] From Manteca USD SAB 50-01 dated January 14, 2008.

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 FlAcree re,rets11520001152101 Manteca USD 2016 Fre JUVLTIL:Caf ,en Study,lodre,162121

APPENDIX E :

Census and Household Data

Table E-1

2010 Census Data

Table E-2

Households Moving into Existing and New Homes

Table E-3

Household Expenditures and Employment Generation (3 pages)

Table E-1 School Mitigation Fee Justification 2010 Census Data

Description Amount

Total Occupied Households a 26,909

Total Households with Children b 10,965

Percentage of Homes with Children c=bla 41%

Percentage of Households without Children d= 1-c 59%

Probability of Household with Children Moving e = c * d 24% into Housing where Residents Had No Children

Employed Residents per Household

1 1.62

Percentage of Employees Forming Households g=1/f 62%

Total Employees [1] i 29,265

Employees Working in County of Residence [1] j 7,304

Percentage of Employees Who Work in County of Residence k = j / i 25%

"census"

[1] From U.S. Census Inflow/Outflow Report for Manteca Unified School District.

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 FAcrlvele.rqeeets,1520W,52,IJVarlecet,SOXI6,eelosr,,caf,ee,V.Voceos,52,

Table E-2 School Mitigation Fee Justification Households Moving into Existing and New Homes

Description 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Existing Homes [1] 28,393 28,858 29,260 29,777 30,203 New Homes [1] 558 481 446 428 370

Existing Turnover (5%) [2] 1,420 1,443 1,463 1,489 1,510

Total Household Moves 1,978 1,924 1,909 1,917 1,880

Percentage of Household Moves Into Existing and New Homes

% Existing 72% 75% 77% 78% 80% % New 28% 25% 23% 22% 20%

Two Year Average Existing 79% New 21%

"homes"

[1] From Department of Finance demographic data for Manteca and Lathrop.

[2] Conservative estimate of annual existing home turnover rates, based on San Joaquin County census data from 2005-2010.

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017 F sActsre Pro,ecrs,15.00 ,152121 Manteca 0,72616 Fee Jusr. car., Sr 4, 52 , 3

of 3

Table E-3 School Mitigation Fee Justification Household Expenditures and Employment Generation

% of Category 2015 Gross % of Household Expenditure per 2015 Expenditures Receipts to 2015 Avg. Total 2015 Avg.

Income Spent per Type of Business Expenditures per 1,000 Wages 2015 Total Wage per # of Workers/ Worker Worker HH Item Category [1] [2] [3] Households (1,000) Wages Worker [4] Workers HH [5] HI-I Income

Calculation

Food at Home [6] 7.1% 100% $3,255

d= c' 1000 e 1= d /e h = f / g j= h / k = g

Food & Beverage Stores 100% $3,255 $3,254,675 10.63 $306,214 $27,601 11 1.62 7 $44,666

Food Away From Home 4.6% 100% $2,195

Food Services and Drinking Places 100% $2,196 02,196.283 3.79 $579,471 $14,527 40 1.62 25 $23,509

Alcoholic Beverages 0.8% 100% $0

Food & Beverage Stores 50% $0 $0 10.63 $0 527,601 0 1.62 0 $44,666

Food Services and Drinking Places 50% $0 $0 3.79 $0 $14,527 0 1.62 0 $23,509

Housing Maintenance, Repairs, Insurance, Other expenses 2.3% 100% $1,013

Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance 45% $456 $455,645 4.06 $112,299 $26,090 4 1.62 3 $42,221

Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealer 45% $456 $455,645 7.71 $59,109 $29.105 2 1.62 $47,101

Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 10% $101 $101,254 4.78 $21,169 $39,483 1 1.62 0 $63,895

Fuel Oil and Other Fuels [8] 0.2% $95

Nonstore Retailers 100% $95 $94,621 18.93 $4,998 541,966 0 1.62 0 $67,914

Water and Other Public Services [8] 1.1% 100% $478

Waste Management and Rernediation Services 100% $478 $477,983 5.22 $91,599 551,150 2 1.62 $82,777

Household Operations Personal Services 0.5% 100% $206

Nursing and Residential Care Facilities 40% $82 $82,330 2.53 $32,543 $27,642 1 1.62 $44,733

Social Assistance [7] 60% $123 5123,495 2.84 $43,555 526,196 2 1.62 542,393

Household Operations Other Household Expenses 1.6% 100% $687

Services to Buildings and Dwellings 100% $687 $686,735 2.63 $261,518 $29,915 9 1,62 5 $48,412

Housekeeping Supplies 1.2% 100% $502

Building Materials and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers 10% $50 $50,237 7.71 $6,517 $29,105 0 1.62 $47,101

Food & Beverage Stores 35% $176 $175,829 10.63 $16,543 $27,601 1 1.62 $44,666

General Merchandise 35% $176 $175,829 10.78 $16,308 $25,732 1.62 $41,642

Miscellaneous Store Retailers [7] 20% $100 0100,474 7.22 $13,910 $23,759 1 1.62 $38,450

[1] Percentage of income spent per category is based on the 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey data for households at the median income level for seniors. Note that the sum of the categories included in this analysis is well below the total expenditures of households at this income level, and thus represent a conservative estimate of job creation and housing impacts. Expenditure categories not incorporated due to data constraints include taxes, housing and lodging, most utilities. tobacco, health insurance, personal/ life insurance, cash contributions, and financing charges.

[2] Where multiple business types are likely to provide goods and services in the expenditure category, EPS has estimated the proportion accruing to each business type.

[3] 2015 expenditures are based on the estimated household income distributed based on the percent of income spent per the 2015 U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey.

[4] 2012 average wage per worker converted to 2015 dollars using the CPI for the San Francisco MSA from the BLS. [5] Based on ACS data current as of 02/02/2017.

[6] Half of the expenditures in the "Alcoholic Beverages" category of the Consumer Expenditure Survey is included in "Food At Home" and the remaining half is included in "Food Away From Home".

[7] Manteca data not available from 2012 Economic Census. Gross receipts to wages and average wage are thus based on statewide data.

[0] Part of the Utilities, Fuels, and Public Services category, which also includes natural gas, electricity, and telephone services. Natural gas, electricity. and telephone services not estimated because data was not available in the

2012 Economic Census,

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017

of 3

Table E-3 School Mitigation Fee Justification Household Expenditures and Employment Generation

% of Category 2015 Gross V. of Household Expenditure per 2015 Expenditures Receipts to 2015 Avg. Total 2015 Avg.

Income Spent per Type of Business Expenditures per 1,000 Wages 2015 Total Wage per 4 of Workers/ Worker Worker HH Item Category [1] [2] [3] Households (1,000) Wages Worker [4] Workers HI-I [5] HH Income

Calculation

Household Furnishings and Equipment 3.2% 100% $1,397

d= c 1000 I = d /e h = fig j=h/i k=

Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores [7] 40% $559 $558,752 7.91 $70,606 $30.379 2 1.62 1 $49,162

Electronics and Appliance Stores 40% $559 5558.752 9.31 $59,993 820.167 3 1.62 2 $32.636

General Merchandise Stores 10% $140 5139,688 10.78 012.956 $25,732 1 1.62 0 $41,642

Miscellaneous Store Retailers 10% $140 0139,688 7.22 $19,338 $23,759 1 1.62 1 $38,450

Apparel and Services 2.6% 100% 51,129

Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 40% $451 $451,450 9.04 $49,955 $16,025 3 1.62 2 $25,933

General Merchandise 40% 5451 0451,450 10.78 $41,872 $25,732 2 1.62 1 541,642

Miscellaneous Store Retailers 10% 5113 5112,863 7.22 $15.625 $23,759 1 1.62 0 $38,450

Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance 5% 556 555,431 4.06 $13.908 526,090 1 1.62 0 542,221

Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services 5% 556 556,431 2.29 524,598 $26,073 1.62 1 $42,194

Vehicle Purchases (net outlay) 8.2% 100% $3,562

Motor Vehicle and Pads Dealers 100% $3,562 53,562,437 44.32 $80,387 $9,765 8 1.62 5 $15,803

Gasoline and Motor Oil 4.5% 100% $1,954

Gasoline Stations 100% 51.954 $1,953,878 44.80 543,615 $21.318 2 1.62 1 $34.500

Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs 1.7% 100% 5732

Repair and Maintenance 100% $732 $731,607 3.53 $207,484 $36,110 6 1.62 4 558,437

Medical Services 1.3% 100% $569

Ambulatory Health Care Services 40% $227 5227,481 2.67 585,200 558,115 1 1.62 $94,048

General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 30% 5171 5170,611 2.91 $58,652 $74,281 1.62 $120,209

Nursing and Residential Care Facilities 30% 5171 5170611 2.53 $67.439 $27,642 2 1.62 2 544.733

Drugs 0.9% 100% $383

Health and Personal Care Stores 100% $383 $383,362 7.30 $52,550 $35,240 1 1.62 1 $57,030

Medical Supplies 0.3% 100% $117

Health and Personal Care Stores 100% 5117 $117,057 7.30 516.046 535,240 0 1.62 557.030

Entertainment Fees and Admissions 0.8% 100% $335

Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation 100% 5335 5334,588 3_04 $110,189 521,524 5 1.62 3 $34.832

[1] Percentage of income spent per category is based on the 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey data for households at the median inoorne level for seniors. Note that the sum of the categories included in this analysis is well below the total expenditures of households at this income level, and thus represent a conservative estimate 01)00 creation and housing impacts. Expenditure categories not incorporated due to data constraints include taxes. housing and lodging. most utilities, tobacco, health insurance, personal/ life insurance. cash contributions. and financing charges.

[2] Where multiple business types are likely to provide goods and services in the expenditure category, EPS has estimated the proportion accruing to each business type.

[3] 2015 expenditures are based on the estimated household income distributed based on the percent of income spent per the 2015 U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey.

[4] 2012 average wage per worker converted to 2015 dollars using the CPI for the San Francisco MSA from the BLS. [5] Based on ACS data current as of 02/02/2017.

[6] Half of the expenditures in the "Alcoholic Beverages" category of the Consumer Expenditure Survey is included in "Food At Home" and the remaining half is included in "Food Away From Home".

[7] Manteca data not available from 2012 Economic Census. Gross receipts to wages and average wage are thus based on statewide data.

[8] Part of the Utilities, Fuels, and Public Services category, which also includes natural gas, electricity, and telephone services. Natural gas, electricity, and telephone services not estimated because data was not available in the

2012 Economic Census.

Prepared by EPS 3/20/2017

of 3

Table E-3

School Mitigation Fee Justification

Household Expenditures and Employment Generation

°A of Category 2015 Gross % of Household Expenditure per 2015 Expenditures Receipts to 2015 Avg. Total 2015 Avg.

Income Spent per Type of Business Expenditures per 1,000 Wages 2015 Total Wage per tt of Workers/ Worker Worker HH

Item Category (1] [2] [3] Households (1,000) Wages Worker [41 Workers HH [51 HH Income

Calculation a

Entertainment Audio and Visual Equipment and Services 2.3% 100% 6995

d= c 1000 = d /e = I/ g j=h/i k=i'g

Electronics and Appliance Stores 100% $995 $994,985 9,31 $106,831 $20,167 5 1.62 3 $32.636

Entertainment Pets, Toys, Hobbies, and Playground Equip. 1.4% 100% $618

Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores 40% 5247 6247,381 9.32 $26,548 $17,762 1 1.62 1 $28,744

Miscellaneous Store Retailers [7] 40% $247 5247,381 7.22 $34,247 $23,759 1.62 1 $38,450

Veterinary Services 20% $124 $123,690 2.99 $41,319 $33,416 1 1.62 1 $54.078

Other Entertainment Supplies, Equipment, and Services 0.7% 100% $295

Sporting Goods, Hobby. and Musical Instrument Stores 85% 6250 5250,405 9.32 526,873 517.762 2 1.62 528,744

Photographic Services 15% 544 544.189 440 510,542 526,658 0 1.62 $43,141

Personal Care Products and Services 1.4% 100% $589

Unspecified Retail 50% $295 $294,594 11.45 $25,724 527,601 1 1.62 1 $44,667

Personal Care Services 50% $295 $294,594 3.01 $97,923 $15.003 7 1.62 4 $24,280

Reading 0.2% 100% $99

Sporting Goods. Hobby. and Musical Instrument Stores 100% $99 998,523 9.32 $10,573 617,762 1.62 528.744

Education 1.3% 100% 5572

Educational Services 100% $572 $571.629 3.15 $181,633 510,433 17 1.62 11 $16,884

Tobacco Products and Smoking Supplies 0.9% 100% $375

Unspecified Retail 100% $375 $374.583 11.45 532.709 527.601 1.62 1 $44.667

Miscellaneous [9] 1.5% 100% $632

Accounting 25% 6158 5158,027 1.78 $88,906 635,857 2 1E2 2 $58.028

Architectural, Engineering, and Related [1] 25% 5158 $158.027 2.62 560,229 565.645 1 1.62 1 $106,234

Specialized Design Services [7] 25% 5158 5158,027 3.29 $48,105 $65,264 1 1.62 0 $105,617

Death Care Services 25% $158 $158,027 3.52 $44.869 $34,481 1 1.62 1 655,801

Total per 1,000 Households 158 98

Total per Household 0.16 0.10

Source: 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012 Economic Census, U.S. Census Bureau: Gen. 2015: Economic 8 Planning Systems, Inc.

[1] Percentage of income spent per category is based on the 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey data for households at the median income level for seniors. Note that the sum of the categories included in this analysis is well below the total expenditures of households at this income level, and thus represent a conservative estimate of job creation and housing impacts. Expenditure categories not incorporated dire to data constraints include taxes, housing arid lodging, most utilities. tobacco, health insurance, personal,' Irfe insurance, cash contributmns, and financing charges.

12] Where multiple business types are likely to provide goods and services in the expenditure category, EPS has estimated the proportion accruing to each business type.

13] 2015 expenditures are based on the estimated household income distributed based on the percent of income spent per the 2015 U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey.

[4] 2012 average wage per worker converted to 2015 dollars using the CPI for the San Francisco MSA from the BLS.

[5] Based on ACS data current as of 02/02/2017.

161 Half of the expenditures in the "Alcoholic Beverages" category of the Consumer Expenditure Survey is included in "Food At Home" and the remaining half is included in "Food Away From Home".

171 Manteca data not available from 2012 Economic Census. Gross receipts to wages and average wage are thus based on statewide data.

181 Part of the Utilities, Fuels, and Public Services category, which also includes natural gas, electricity, and telephone services. Natural fps, electricity, and telephone services not estimated because data was not evadable in the

2012 Economic Census.

[91 Miscellaneous also includes legal services. However. legal services are not estimated because data was not available in the 2010 Economic Census.

[10] Note that average salary reported for architecture. engineering and related industries reflects the full range of employees within the industry. not solely professional and technical staff.

Prepared by EPS 3/2012017

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 209.825.3200 Board Agendas

Department: OS/HR Type: Public Hearing

Item Number: 2


Agenda Item

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Operational Services TITLE: Receive Input From the Public Regarding the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Nile

Garden School Water Supply Project Background/Rationale:

Funding Source: Presentation: N/A No Yes (attached) Yes. Presented at the Board meeting. Recommendation: N/A Prepared By: Approved By: Facilities Department Clark Burke, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent

Public notice was published in the Manteca Bulletin on March 21, 2017 and also mailed to the City of Manteca Planning Department, Building and Safety, Fire, Police, Public Works, Manteca City Library, State Clearinghouse, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, California Department Fish & Wildlife, San Joaquin County Community Development Department, San Joaquin County Environmental Health, State Water Resources Control Board, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Lathrop-Manteca Fire District, San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Joaquin County Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Comcast Cable, Caltrans/District 10 Environmental Branch, San Joaquin Council of Governments, San Joaquin County Clerk, California Department of Conservation, Pacific Gas & Electric, Verizon California, and Union Pacific Railroad Co. The draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration will be available for public review from March 20, 2017 to April 18, 2017. A copy of the Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is available at the City of Manteca and Manteca Unified School District offices. The date of the public hearing is scheduled for April 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. at the Manteca Unified School District Office. After receiving public comment, the report will be accepted as a consent item later in the meeting.

https://musd-public.sharepoint.com/Superintendent%20Office/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FSuperintendent%20Office%2FBoard%20Agendas&View=%7BCCB1F14E%2D0A27%2D483E%2DAAD9%2D2B44D9A1C242%7D&

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPTA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Notice of Avail abil ity/N otice of Intent to Adopt an

I nitial Study/Mitigated Negative School Water Supply Project

Notice is hereby given that the Manteca Unified School District, as Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality

Act (CEQA), has prepared a Notice of Availability for an Initial Study for the Nile Garden School Water Supply Project

("Project"), and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. This notice is provided pursuant to

noticing requirements found in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Sec. 21092), and

the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines Sec. 15072 and 15073). Copies of available materials may be reviewed or obtained

from the Manteca Unified School District's office at the address below.

Project Proponent's name and address: Manteca Unified School District, 2271 W Louise Ave, Manteca, CA 95337

Project location: The project will occur on the campus of the Nile Garden Elementary School, which is located at 5700 E Nile

Rd (Assessor's Parcel Number 22607003). The project will also take place on portions of Oleander Avenue, Woodward

Avenue, Peach Road, and Union Road, and at Palmer Park on Sephos Street. The project is located in both the City of

Manteca and in San Joaquin County. The site is located on the USGS 7.5' Manteca (2015) Quadrangle map and in Sections 2

and 18, Township 2S, Range 7E MDB&M.

Project Description: The project is an upgrade to an existing water system to address water quality issues, specifically

arsenic, at the Nile Garden Elementary School, within the Manteca Unified School District (MUSD). The project includes a

new well (Well 30) located at Palmer Park, new water lines, and new treatment equipment at the Nile Garden School.

Domestic supply at the school will utilize water from the new Well 30. The existing well at the Nile Garden Elementary

School will be converted to only serve non-potable uses. A new well (Well 30), owned and operated by the City of Manteca,

will be constructed within the City of Manteca limits at Palmer Park on Sephos Street.

The Project will also construct a 12-inch water main loop within the City of Manteca limits on Oleander Road (between

Woodward Avenue and Peach Road), on Peach Road (between Oleander Road and Union Road), and on Union Road

(between Woodward Avenue and Peach Road). The 12-in pipe will be approximately 7,200 feet, and will be owned and

operated by the City of Manteca. In addition, a connection to the city waterline, will be installed at the corner of Union

Road and Peach Road. The meter will be owned and maintained by the City of Manteca and the backflow preventer will be

owned and maintained by Manteca Unified School District. All lines south of this connection will be owned, maintained, and

operated by MUSD.

The Project will also construct a 4-inch waterline, approximately 6,600 feet, from the meter located at Peach Road and

Union Road, south along Union Road and then west on Nile Avenue to the Nile Garden School.

Environmental Issues: Potentially significant impacts have been identified in the following topic area: Aesthetics, Biological

Resources, Cultural Resources, and Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Mitigations measures proposed to reduce impacts to

a less than significant level. No unavoidable significant impacts were identified. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section

15087(c)(6), the project area does not contain sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Public Review Period: The Draft IS/MND will be available for a public review period from March 20, 2017 to April 18, 2017. Comments on this Draft IS/MND should be addressed to: C2 Consult, Corp., 2125 Kern St., Ste 301, Fresno, CA 93721. A

copy of the Public Review Draft IS/MND is available at the Manteca Unified School District office between the hours of 8AM

and 4PM at the above address and at the City of Manteca Public Works Department at 1001 W Center St, Manteca. All

comments must be received in writing at the C2 Consult address listed above no later than 5 p.m. on April 18, 2017,

Public Meeting: A public meeting has been tentatively scheduled to discuss the Project, answer questions, and possibly

take action on the project. The meeting is scheduled for April 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. at the Manteca Unified School District

office, located at 2271 W Louise Ave, Manteca, CA 95337.

Staff Contact: Quincy Yaley, AICP, Director of Planning, C2 Consult, Corp., 2125 Kern St., Ste 301, Fresno, CA 93721, 720-

502-7236 or [email protected]

FOR THE NILE GARDEN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT

LEAD AGENCY:

manteca unified school district209.825.3200

2271 W LOUSE AVE.

MANTECA, CA 95337

PREPARED BY:

C2 CONSULT, CORP.720.502.7236

2125 KERN STREET, SUITE 301

FRESNO, CA 93721

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/

MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION

March 2017Manteca, CA

Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Nile Garden Elementary School

Water Supply Project Manteca, California

March 2017

Lead Agency: Manteca Unified School District

Manteca Unified School District 2271 W Louise Ave

Manteca, California 95337 209-825-3200

Prepared by:

C2 Consult, Corp

2125 Kern Street, Suite 301

Fresno, California 93721 720-502-7236

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sections Page # Section 1. Project Description 1 Section 2. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4 Section 3. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 5 Section 4. Checklist of Environmental Impact Issues 6 Section 5. References 44

Appendices Appendix A. Project Maps A-1 Appendix B. Site Photos A-7 Appendix C. Caleemod Air Quality Analysis A-11 Appendix D. Biological Resources Report A-34

Nile Garden Elementary School Water Supply Pipeline Project Page 1

Section 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is an upgrade to an existing water system to address water quality issues, specifically arsenic, at the Nile Garden Elementary School, within the Manteca Unified School District (MUSD) in Manteca, California (Figures 1 and 2). The project includes a new well (Well 30) located at Palmer Park, new water lines, and new treatment equipment at the Nile Garden School (Figures 3-5). Domestic supply at the school will utilize water from the new Well 30. The existing well at the Nile Garden Elementary School will be converted to only serve non-potable uses. A new well (Well 30), owned and operated by the City of Manteca, will be constructed within the City of Manteca limits at Palmer Park on Sephos Street. The new well will be 16-inchs in diameter, 540 feet deep, and have a capacity of up to 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm). The Project will also construct a 12-inch water main loop within the City of Manteca limits on Oleander Road (between Woodward Avenue and Peach Road), on Peach Road (between Oleander Road and Union Road), and on Union Road (between Woodward Avenue and Peach Road). The 12-in pipe will be approximately 7,200 feet, and will be owned and operated by the City of Manteca. In addition, a connection to the city waterline, including a gate-valve, water meter and box, and backflow preventer will be installed at the corner of Union Road and Peach Road. The meter will be owned and maintained by the City of Manteca and the backflow preventer will be owned and maintained by Manteca Unified School District. All lines south of this connection will be owned, maintained, and operated by MUSD. The Project will also construct a 4-inch waterline, approximately 6,600 feet, from the meter located at Peach Road and Union Road, south along Union Road and then west on Nile Avenue to the Nile Garden School. The 4-in waterline is outside the city limits of Manteca, and will be the responsibility of the MUSD to own, operate, and maintain. The Project will provide new waterlines and connections as necessary on the School campus to separate potable water uses from landscape uses. All potable water uses will be supplied from the City of Manteca meter, and all non-potable water uses will be supplied by the existing school wells. The school is currently served by two wells and one 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic tank. A new 10,000 gallon water tank, along with booster pumps, will be constructed. Approximately 7,200 feet of 12-inch waterline and 6,600 feet of 4-inch waterline will be installed in existing road rights-of-ways within the following roadways:

Oleander Avenue – 12 inch water line

Peach Road – 12 inch water line

Union Road – 12 inch north of Peach Road, 4 inch water line south of Peach Road

Nile Road – 4 inch water line The Nile Garden Elementary School is located on a 15.3 acre site. The Nile Garden School has a population of 535, and is projected to grow to 550 students. The zoning on the campus is P/F (Public) and the land use designation on the site is AG (General Agricultural) by the County of San Joaquin. The well site is zoned Planned Development Overlay (PD) and is designated Public (P/F) by the City of Manteca. In addition to the above, fire hydrants will be installed along the 12 inch water line. No fire hydrants will be installed south of the meter located at Peach and Union Road.


Project Objective The project objective is to allow Nile Garden Elementary School to comply with the drinking water regulations and to obtain a new water source to solve the arsenic non-compliance issue at the school site. The project will provide a reliable water supply and water quality meeting the arsenic drinking water standards to the Nile Garden Elementary School. In 2015, the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission approved an emergency out-of-agency water connection from the City of Manteca to the Nile Garden Elementary School. The connection was approved due to the health risk associated with excess levels of arsenic in the school’s water supply, which exceed the State arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 0.010 mg/L (equivalent to 10 micrograms per liter, μg/L). Project Location The City of Manteca is located at the junction of State Route 99 and State Route120, approximately 75 miles east of San Francisco and 55 miles south of Sacramento. Manteca is located approximately 12 miles south of downtown Stockton, and 14 miles northwest of the City of Modesto. The project is located south of State Route 120 and west of State Route 99. The project will occur on the campus of the Nile Garden Elementary School, which is located at 5700 E Nile Rd (Assessor’s Parcel Number 22607003). The project will also take place on portions of Oleander Avenue, Woodward Avenue, Peach Road, and Union Road. The project is located in both the City of Manteca and in San Joaquin County. All project activities south of Peach Road occur within San Joaquin County, and activities north of Peach Road occur within the Manteca city limits. The project activities proposed in San Joaquin County are within the City of Manteca Sphere of Influence. In total the overall project site is located across a span of 2 miles. Nile Garden Elementary School is found on the USGS 7.5’ Manteca (2015) Quadrangle map. The project is located in Sections 2 and 18, Township 2S, Range 7E MDB&M. The project site is approximately 35 feet above sea level, and the topography is flat. Construction Activities Construction staging will be located in several areas on and near the elementary school campus and the roadways near the school. Staging areas are where the construction equipment, materials, and trailer office (if necessary) would be stored and where construction workers would park their personal vehicles. Laydown areas along the pipeline route would also be used to store materials. The laydown areas vary in size. The areas would be kept clean and restored to their original condition after construction is complete. Open cut trenching would be utilized for most of the pipeline alignment and for tank and booster pump installation at the water treatment facility, with the exception of areas where pipe will be placed in the ground by horizontal directional drilling (HDD). Pipe segments will be placed along the right-of-way adjacent to the trench alignment. Open-cut trenching will be performed using construction equipment to excavate the trench alignment, temporarily placing excavated material within the easement adjacent to the trench. The trench for the pipeline will be approximately 4 feet deep and 3 feet wide. The trench excavator (back hoe) will be used to place the pipe segment into the trench. The joints will be slip joint


bell and spigot polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or ductile iron standard water pipe. The excavated material will be used to backfill the trench to pre-project conditions. The California Environmental Quality Act Process This document has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] 15000 et seq.). CEQA requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before they approve or implement those projects. The Initial Study is a public document used by the decision-making lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. In the case of the proposed project, the Manteca Unified School District is the lead agency and will use the Initial Study to determine whether the proposed project has a significant effect on the environment. If the lead agency finds substantial evidence that any aspect of the proposed project, either alone or in combination with other projects, may have a significant effect on the environment, that agency is required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a supplement to a previously prepared EIR, or a subsequent EIR to analyze the proposed project at hand. If the agency finds no substantial evidence that the proposed project or any of its aspects may cause a significant impact on the environment, a negative declaration may be prepared. If, over the course of the analysis, the proposed project is found to have a significant impact on the environment that, with specific mitigation measures, can be reduced to a less-than-significant level, a supplemental mitigated negative declaration may be prepared. In the case of this proposed project, all significant or potentially significant impacts on the environment would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with incorporation of specific mitigation measures. Therefore, this document is a mitigated negative declaration. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May be Required (Responsible or Trustee Agencies):

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)

Office of Parks and Recreation/State Historic Preservation Officer – Reviews the project for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) –Reviews/approves project for compliance with applicable rules and regulation, specifically impacts to sensitive plant, animal, and wetland/riparian habitat. Collects CDFW filing fee for review of project environmental document, unless a No Effect Determination is issued.

Regional Water Quality Control Board – Section 401 Water Quality Certification; National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharge for construction activities

City of Manteca – Building Permit/Grading Permit


Section 2. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced, as discussed below).

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identity the following:

a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.

b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.

c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.

6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:

a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and

b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.


Section 3. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and

Forestry Resources

Air Quality

Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils

Greenhouse Gas

Emissions

Hazards & Hazardous

Materials

Hydrology/Water Quality

Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise

Population/Housing Public Services Recreation

Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service

Systems

Mandatory Findings of

Significance

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date _____ _________________________________ Printed Name For


Section 4. CHECKLIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ISSUES

1.

AESTHETICS. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact

Less than Significant

With Mitigation

Incorporated

Less Than Significant

Impact No

Impact

(a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?

(b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?

(c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?

(d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?

Environmental Setting There are three components to the project: a new well, the water lines within the public roadways, and the new equipment at the Nile Garden Elementary School. At the Nile Garden Elementary School, new potable water lines and equipment will be constructed in currently developed portions of the campus. Along Union, Oleander, Nile, and Peach, construction will take place adjacent to the roadway surface, in an area that is vacant of native vegetation and above ground structures. The proposed well location is located in an area of Manteca where new homes have been recently finished, and others are under construction. The well site is located in the southeastern corner of Palmer Park, and is accessed by residential roads. Impact Analysis a, b, and c) NO IMPACT. The project site is located within the City of Manteca and the City of Manteca Sphere of Influence/San Joaquin County. The majority of the project improvements will be underground, and any above ground components will be in previously disturbed areas. The project site is not adjacent to a state scenic highway and does not contain scenic vistas. Views from the project site to the surrounding area are limited by vegetation, structures, and topography, and are not unique to the area or project vicinity. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED. There are existing light sources at Nile Garden Elementary School that illuminate pathways and buildings. A new light source is proposed at the well site and will be minimal and will not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. This light will be installed for security purposes and to assist staff during necessary maintenance. However, to ensure that the new light source does not create a significant impact, MM-AES-1 shall be implemented, which will require that all new lighting be shielded and directed downward to minimize spillover onto adjacent properties.


Mitigation Measures: MM AES-1: Exterior lighting shall be designed and maintained in a manner such that glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel, and shall be hooded and directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. The use of blinking, flashing or unusually high intensity or bright lights shall not be allowed. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate to the use they are serving, in scale, intensity and height.

2. AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES. (In determining

whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.) Would the project:

Potentially Significant

Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?

(b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?

(c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?

(d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

(e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?

Environmental Setting The project site is located within the San Joaquin Valley, which is the state’s top agricultural producing region. San Joaquin County had an overall gross value production of over $2.7 billion dollars in 2015. There are agricultural land uses adjacent to the project site and in the project vicinity. No forest or timber land is located within the City of Manteca or the County of San Joaquin. California Land Conservation Act: The California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for preserving agricultural


land or related open space uses. Land under agricultural production can have its annual assessed valuation for property tax calculation reduced if the owner agrees to place the land under a Williamson Act contract for 10 years, renewable annually. Local governments receive an annual subvention of forgone property tax revenues from the State via the Open Space Subvention Act of 1971, but these payments were suspended in 2009 as part of the State budget cuts. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP): The FMMP was established by the State of California in 1982 in response to a critical need for assessing the location, quality, and quantity of agricultural lands and conversion of these lands over time. The FMMP is a non-regulatory program overseen by the Department of Conservation and provides a consistent and impartial analysis of agricultural land use and land use changes throughout California. The FMMP provides land use conversion information for decision makers to use in their planning for present and future uses of California’s agricultural land resources, including the biannual preparation of “Important Farmland Maps”. The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program indicates that in 2014, agricultural lands in San Joaquin County include 536,330 acres of important farmland (designated as FMMP Prime, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance) and 212,303 acres of non-irrigated pasture land, for a total of 748,633 acres of mapped agricultural land. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project site is located within an existing school site, existing roadways, and a disturbed area adjacent to a park within an existing subdivision. Adjacent to, but outside of the project area is land designated as prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance. However, the project will not extend or intrude into these areas. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b and c) NO IMPACT. The zoning at school site is Public (P/F) and is designated as General Agricultural (A/G) in the County of San Joaquin General Plan. The zoning at the well site is Planned Development Overlay (PD) and the land use designation is Park (P). If zoning boundaries extend over roadways, any planned or conditional uses in that zoning district are not applicable as roadways are located within public road easements. There is not a Williamson Act contract on the property at either site, although the school site is located within Agricultural Preserve R-69-C1. The project will not conflict with the existing zoning or a Williamson Act contract. The project would not conflict or cause rezoning of forest land or timberland zoned Timberland Production. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) NO IMPACT. The project site is located in an urban area, and does not contain any designated forest land or timber land. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the


domestic water supply on campus. Any changes in the environment resulting from the project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non-agricultural use. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

3. AIR QUALITY. (Where available, the significance criteria

established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project:


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?

(b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?

(c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?

(d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?

(e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?

Environmental Setting The City of Manteca and San Joaquin County are located within in the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The proposed project is located entirely in the SJVAB, which encompasses more than 20,000 square miles of desert habitat. The SJVAB consists of eight different counties and is one of the fastest growing regions in the state of California. The southern portion of San Joaquin County (where the project is located) is regulated by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). In Table 1 below are the state and federal ambient air quality designations for various pollutants. Pollutants that are in non-attainment status can be categorized as moderate, severe, and extreme, based on the concentration level of the pollutants. The SJVAPCD established a program of rules and regulations directed at attainment of state and national air quality standards. All development projects within the SJVAPCD are required to comply with existing rules as they apply to a specific project. The project may be subject to, but not limited to, the following district rules:

Rule 4101 – Visible Emissions

Rule 4102 – Nuisance


Table 1. SJVAPCD Designations and Classifications

Pollutant Designation/Classification

Federal Standardsa State Standards

b

Ozone - One hour No Federal Standardf Nonattainment/Severe

Ozone - Eight hour Nonattainment/Extremee Nonattainment

PM 10 Attainmentc Nonattainment

PM 2.5 Nonattainmentd Nonattainment

Carbon Monoxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment/Unclassified

Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment

Sulfur Dioxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment

Lead (Particulate) No Designation/Classification Attainment

Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal Standard Unclassified

Sulfates No Federal Standard Attainment

Visibility Reducing Particles No Federal Standard Unclassified

Vinyl Chloride No Federal Standard Attainment a See 40 CFR Part 81

b See CCR Title 17 Sections 60200-60210

c On September 25, 2008, EPA redesignated the San Joaquin Valley to attainment for the PM10 National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS) and approved the PM10 Maintenance Plan. d The Valley is designated nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA designated the Valley as nonattainment for the 2006

PM2.5 NAAQS on November 13, 2009 (effective December 14, 2009). e Though the Valley was initially classified as serious nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, EPA approved Valley

reclassification to extreme nonattainment in the Federal Register on May 5, 2010 (effective June 4, 2010). f Effective June 15, 2005, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revoked the federal 1-hour ozone standard, including

associated designations and classifications. EPA had previously classified the SJVAB as extreme nonattainment for this standard. EPA approved the 2004 Extreme Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan on March 8, 2010 (effective April 7, 2010). Many applicable requirements for extreme 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas continue to apply to the SJVAB.

The SJVAPCD does not meet the state 1-hour or federal 8-hour standard for ozone or for PM 2.5. The District also does not meet the PM 10 state standard. On certain days the air quality in the basin is unhealthy for residents. The county's sunny climate, pollution-trapping mountains, and pollution from agricultural activities, all contribute to the problem. Local jurisdictions have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through their policies, codes, and land use planning. The City of Manteca assesses air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts, and ensures implementation of such mitigation. The City of Manteca Municipal Code contains provisions relevant to maintaining the quality of air for the area that the proposed project will follow. The ambient concentrations of air pollutant emissions are determined by the amount of emissions released by pollutant sources and the atmosphere’s ability to transport, transform, and dilute such emissions. Natural factors that affect pollutant transport include terrain, wind, atmospheric stability, and sunlight. Therefore, existing air quality conditions in the project area are determined by such natural factors as topography, meteorology, and climate, in addition to the types and quantities of emissions released by existing air pollutant sources. Ozone (O3) is a reactive gas consisting of three atoms of oxygen. In the troposphere, it is a product of the photochemical process involving the sun's energy. It is a secondary pollutant that is formed when


nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) react in the presence of sunlight. Ozone at the earth's surface causes numerous adverse health effects and is a criteria pollutant. It is a major component of smog. In the stratosphere, ozone exists naturally and shields Earth from harmful incoming ultraviolet radiation. High concentrations of ground level ozone can adversely affect the human respiratory system and aggravate cardiovascular disease and many respiratory ailments. Ozone also damages natural ecosystems such as forests and foothill communities, agricultural crops, and some man-made materials, such as rubber, paint, and plastics. Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) is a reactive chemical gas, composed of hydrocarbon compounds that may contribute to the formation of smog by their involvement in atmospheric chemical reactions. No separate health standards exist for ROG as a group. Because some compounds that make up ROG are also toxic, like the carcinogen benzene, they are often evaluated as part of a toxic risk assessment. Total Organic Gases (TOG) includes all of the ROGs, in addition to low reactivity organic compounds like methane and acetone. ROGs and volatile organic compounds (VOC) are subsets of TOG. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) are hydrocarbon compounds that exist in the ambient air. VOCs contribute to the formation of smog and/or may themselves be toxic. VOC emissions are a major precursor to the formation of ozone. VOCs often have an odor, and some examples include gasoline, alcohol, and the solvents used in paints. Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) is a family of gaseous nitrogen compounds that are a precursor to the formation of ozone and particulate matter. The major component of NOx, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), is a reddish-brown gas that is toxic at high concentrations. NOx results primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels under high temperature and pressure. On road and off-road motor vehicles and fuel combustion are the major sources of this air pollutant. Particulate Matter (PM), also known as particle pollution, is a complex mixture of extremely small particles and liquid droplets. Particle pollution is made up of a number of components, including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. EPA is concerned about particles that are 10 micrometers in diameter or smaller because those are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. EPA groups particle pollution into three categories based on their size and where they are deposited:

"Inhalable coarse particles (PM2.5-10)," such as those found near roadways and dusty industries, are between 2.5 and 10 micrometers in diameter. PM2.5-10 is deposited in the thoracic region of the lungs.

"Fine particles (PM2.5)," such as those found in smoke and haze, are 2.5 micrometers in diameter and smaller. These particles can be directly emitted from sources such as forest fires, or they can form when gases emitted from power plants, industries and automobiles react in the air. They penetrate deeply into the thoracic and alveolar regions of the lungs.

“Ultrafine particles (UFP),” are very small particles less than 0.1 micrometers in diameter largely resulting from the combustion of fossils fuels, meat, wood and other hydrocarbons. While UFP


mass is a small portion of PM2.5, its high surface area, deep lung penetration, and transfer into the bloodstream can result in disproportionate health impacts relative to their mass. PM10, PM2.5, and UFP include primary pollutants (emitted directly to the atmosphere) as well as secondary pollutants (formed in the atmosphere by chemical reactions among precursors). Generally speaking, PM2.5 and UFP are emitted by combustion sources like vehicles, power generation, industrial processes, and wood burning, while PM10 sources include these same sources plus roads and farming activities. Fugitive windblown dust and other area sources also represent a source of airborne dust in the Valley. Acute and chronic health effects associated with high particulate levels include the aggravation of chronic respiratory diseases, heart and lung disease, coughing, bronchitis, and respiratory illnesses in children.

Carbon Monoxide (CO) is an odorless, colorless gas that is highly toxic. It is formed by the incomplete combustion of fuels and is emitted directly into the air (unlike ozone). The main source of CO in the AVAB is on-road motor vehicles. Other CO sources in the Valley include other mobile sources, miscellaneous processes, and fuel combustion from stationary sources. Because of the local nature of CO problems, ARB and EPA designate urban areas as CO nonattainment areas instead of the entire basin as with ozone and PM10. Motor vehicles are by far the largest source of CO emissions. Emissions from motor vehicles have been declining since 1985, despite increases in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), with the introduction of new automotive emission controls and fleet turnover. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, irritating gas with a "rotten egg" smell formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. The AVAB is in attainment of the California standards for SO2. However, like airborne NOx, suspended SO2 particles contribute to the poor visibility that sometimes occurs in the Valley. These SO2 particles can also combine with other pollutants to form PM2.5. The prevalence of low-sulfur fuel use in the AVAB has minimized problems from this pollutant. Lead (Pb), is a metal that is a natural constituent of air, water, and the biosphere. Lead is neither created nor destroyed in the environment, so it essentially persists forever. The health effects of lead poisoning include loss of appetite, weakness, apathy, and miscarriage; it can also cause lesions of the neuromuscular system, circulatory system, brain, and gastrointestinal tract. Gasoline-powered automobile engines were a major source of airborne lead through the use of leaded fuels. The use of leaded fuel has been mostly phased out, with the result that ambient concentrations of lead have dropped dramatically. Lead concentrations were last systematically measured in the Antelope Valley Air Basin in 1989, when the average concentrations were approximately five percent of the State lead standard. Sulfates (SO42-) are the fully oxidized ionic form of sulfur. Sulfates occur in combination with metal and/or hydrogen ions. In California, emissions of sulfur compounds occur primarily from the combustion of petroleum-derived fuels (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel) that contain sulfur. This sulfur is oxidized to SO2 during the combustion process and subsequently converted to sulfate compounds in the atmosphere. The conversion of SO2 to sulfates takes place comparatively rapidly and completely in urban areas of California due to regional meteorological features.


Below is the air quality monitoring data for stations in the project vicinity:

Table 2. California Air Resources Board Air Quality Monitoring Data-Ozone

Monitoring Sites #Days > State 1-hr

standard #Days > Nat’l ’08 8-hr

standard #Days > State 8-hr

standard

2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015

Stockton – Hazelton Street 0 0 1 1 5 3

Tracy- Airport 1 4 8 5 17 21

Source: http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/

Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. Air quality plans describe air pollution control strategies to be implemented by a city, county, or region. The primary purpose of an air quality plan is to maintain attainment of California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), or to bring an area that does not attain a CAAQS or an NAAQS into compliance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act and California Clean Air Act. The SJVAPCD is responsible for formulating and implementing air quality plans to address State and Federal planning requirements. The air quality attainment plans and reports present comprehensive strategies to reduce emissions of ROG, NOX, and PM10 from stationary, area, mobile, and indirect sources. Such strategies include the adoption of rules and regulations; enhancement of CEQA participation; adoption of local air quality plans; and implementation of control measures for stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. The project involves temporary earthmoving and minor excavation to construct the well, water lines, and support equipment. The air quality impacts of the project would be primarily construction-related emissions that are temporary and short term in nature (see response 3.b below). Because construction and operation of the project would not substantially increase air pollutant emissions within the San Joaquin Valley air basin, the project would not interfere with the SJVAPCD’s plans to achieve or maintain attainment for various air quality pollutants. There is no evidence that this project will conflict with or obstruct the implementation of any applicable components of the State Implementation Plan to meet Federal and State air quality standards or conflict with Air District or County air quality plans. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. According to the SJVAPCD guidance for CEQA documents, construction of a project could result in adverse air quality effects if temporary, short-term construction-related or operational emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would exceed the thresholds of significance established by the SJVAPCD (see Table 3 below). In the case of the project, no long-term operational emissions would occur, and this analysis relates only to construction activities which would result in air emissions that would be “short term” or temporary in duration. Such emissions, especially fugitive dust emissions, have the potential to represent an impact with respect to air quality. Fugitive dust emissions are primarily associated with site preparation during construction and vary as a function of such parameters as soil silt content, soil moisture, wind speed,


acreage of disturbance area, and miles traveled by construction vehicles on- and off-site. Reactive Organic Gases and NOx are ozone precursor emissions and are primarily associated with mobile equipment exhaust. Construction of the project would result in the temporary generation of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions. Off-site vehicle trips related to construction would be associated with hauling of excavated material, material and equipment delivery to the site, and worker commute trips. Table 3 presents the predicted construction emissions for the project which were estimated by utilizing CalEEMod (Version 2011.3.1) software, which is shown in Appendix C.

Table 3. Project Construction and Operational Emissions

Pollutant

Construction

Emissions

(Tons/Year)

Operation

Emissions

(Tons/Year)

SJVAPCD Annual

Thresholds of

Significance (tons)

CO2e 90.53 (MT/YR) 2.00e-005

N/A

Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0.61 1.00e-005

100

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) 1.10 TRACE 10

ROG 0.11 TRACE 10

VOC No model output No model output N/A

Lead (Pb) No model output No model output N/A

PM2.5 0.06 TRACE 15

PM10 0.06 TRACE 15

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 1.00e-003

TRACE 27

TRACE: Quantity so small not registering in model

As shown in Table 3, there would be no exceedance of air quality emission thresholds identified pollutants in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. For those pollutants not measured in the air quality model (lead, VOC, ozone), given the type of proposed project, it is not expected that pollutant levels would exceed established thresholds of significance. The project would not contribute substantially to or violate an established air quality standard. This impact is less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. c) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. Although the project would result in the emission of a minor amount of ozone-precursor compounds, the emissions would be from mobile sources (i.e., construction equipment). Due to the expected construction duration and the expected small number of internal combustion engines, project construction would not exceed the thresholds set by the SJVAPCD. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. Land uses such as schools, hospitals, and convalescent homes are considered to be relatively sensitive to poor air quality because infants, the elderly, and people with health afflictions, especially respiratory ailments, are more susceptible to respiratory infections and other air quality related health problems than the general public. Residential areas are also considered


to be sensitive to air pollution because residents (including children and the elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. Residential land uses are located adjacent to the project site along the project roadways. Further, a part of the project site is located on an elementary school campus. The primary airborne emission, which would be dust generated from construction, would occur for a short timeframe. Once construction is complete, airborne dust emissions would no longer occur. Significant air quality emissions are not associated with the operation of this project. Given that construction emissions will be temporary in nature, impacts to sensitive receptors in the vicinity would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The generation of noticeable offensive odors is not associated with the proposed actions. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

4.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

(b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

(c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?

(d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

(e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

(f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

Environmental Setting


The project site is located in an urban area and is a combination of paved surfaces, a developed school site, and ruderal vegetated areas. Landscaping is present on the adjacent developed parcels in certain locations. There are no water sources, native vegetation, or wetland or aquatic habitat present on the site. The site was not classified using the Holland system due to its present urban condition. CNDDB: The database search was completed with the July 2016 Commercial Version for both the listings and the GIS data layers. IPaC Trust Report: This report identifies species within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) that carry federal listing protection (Endangered or Threatened), migratory birds listed as a BCC, critical habitats, and wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries. Wetlands that are listed by the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) are also identified. The USFWS online web database was accessed on July 2016 for this report. The database primarily concerns itself with the location of the project with its overlap of the general habitat requirements of the species or known locations of the historical sightings of the species. No critical habitat, wildlife refuges, fish hatcheries or NWI wetlands were identified as occurring either on, or in the proximity of the project location. CNPS: The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) maintains a native rare plant list that is utilized for CEQA review purposes. The on-line web database was accessed for this report on March 15, 2016. The CNPS has created a ranking system that is placed on a plant, either at the species or sub-species level. The ranking system is:

1A: Plants Presumed Extirpated (extinct) in California and Either Rare or Extinct Elsewhere;

1B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere

2A: Plants Presumed Extirpated in California, But Common Elsewhere

2B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More Common Elsewhere

3: Plants Which More Information is needed - A Review List

4: Plants of Limited Distribution - A Watch List In addition, each rank is given a “threat” assessment:

0.1-Seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat)

0.2-Moderately threatened in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat)

0.3-Not very threatened in California (less than 20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known)

The CNDDB, IPaC USFWS, and CNPS list of state and federally listed special-status species with potential to occur within the Manteca 7.5-minute quadrangle and the surrounding eight quadrangles initially returned 54 species and 4 sensitive habitats with occurrence reports in those quadrangle map areas or in San Joaquin County, or may be present. After reviewing the list and eliminating species that have no habitat in the project site, and all plants and animals with status listings not required for evaluation under CEQA and NEPA, one species was evaluated for presence or absence during the site visit. Specific reasons for not evaluating a species are listed in the biological report in Appendix D of this report. Critical habitat was identified in the area of the project site for the Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus).


Impact Analysis a and d) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION. A biological report was completed for the project site and can be found in Appendix D of this report. The report included an evaluation of all plant and animal species with potential habitat on the site, including critical habitat, sensitive habitats, and migratory corridors of native fish and wildlife. After reviewing the results of the database searches, as well as completing the site inspection, it was determined that the project site would not be potential habitat to 54 species and 4 sensitive habitats identified in the CNDDB search, the USFWS IPAC search, and on CNPS list. The project site is completely developed and lacks suitable habitat for any sensitive species, with the exception of the Swainson’s hawk and nesting or migratory birds. Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni) This species is an uncommon breeding resident and migrant in the Central Valley, Klamath Basin, Northeastern Plateau, Lassen County, and Mojave Desert. Swainson’s hawks breed in stands with few trees in juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, and in oak savannah in the Central Valley. The Swainson's hawk is not an obligate riparian species; its relationship with riparian habitats is variable and largely dependent on the availability and distribution of suitable nesting trees in proximity to high-quality foraging habitats. In the Central Valley, nest sites are strongly associated with riparian forest vegetation. They forage in adjacent grasslands or suitable grain or alfalfa fields, or livestock pastures. While there is no suitable breeding habitat within the APE, adjacent farmland could be utilized by this species. Operation of the project will not impact this species, however construction activities could result in impacts to the Swainson’s hawk. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact on this species with the implementation of the mitigation measures MM-BIO-1 through MM-BIO-3. Nesting and Migratory Birds A survey for avian nests was completed at the project site. No active avian nests were observed during the survey. No nests were found in trees that would be impacted by project activities. It is unlikely that birds would choose the project site for nesting, as the school has an active student population during the school year, and the adjacent agricultural crops are consistently disturbed by workers and maintained. However, there is a possibility that despite the site conditions, nests could be established on or adjacent to the project site. Nearly all native bird species are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If birds were to nest on site prior to construction, project‐related activities could result in the abandonment of active nests or direct mortality to birds. Such an activity would constitute a violation of state and federal laws and would be considered a significant impact. Despite no nests being observed, the proposed project has the potential to impact nesting birds and migratory birds if project construction occurs during the nesting season. Typically the avian nesting season is identified between February 1 and August 31. To prevent the take of nesting birds protected under California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503 and 3505.5, as well as bird species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, measures should be included as mitigation if project activities will occur


between February 1 and August 31. The project may result in impacts to migratory and nesting birds, but is not likely to adversely affect these species with the implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-4, along with MM-BIO-2 and MM-BIO 3 listed below. With the implementation of MM-BIO-1 through MM-BIO-4, the project will have a less than significant impact on sensitive animal species. The project site is completely dominated by paved surfaces or other disturbed areas. There is no habitat for sensitive plant species. The project will not result in impacts to sensitive plant species. There are no oak trees on the project site. Oak woodland habitat and heritage oak trees are not found within the APE. There would be no impacts to these resources, and no mitigation measures would be necessary.

Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-1: If avoidance of the avian breeding season (February 15 to September 15) is not feasible, beginning thirty days prior to the initiation of project activities, a qualified biologist with experience in conducting breeding bird surveys conduct a bird survey to detect protected bird species occurring in suitable nesting habitat to be disturbed and (as access to adjacent areas allows) any other such habitat within 500 feet and shall include trees, vegetation, and small mammal burrows along the alignment. If a bird species are found, the project proponent should delay all project activities within 500 feet of on- and off-site suitable nesting habitat until August 31. Alternatively, the qualified biologist could continue the surveys weekly in order to locate any nests. If a nest is located, project activities within 500 feet of the nest or as determined by a qualified biological monitor, must be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Flagging, stakes, and/or construction fencing should be used to demarcate the inside boundary of the buffer of 500 feet between the project activities and the nest. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on the sensitivity of the area. The biological monitor should provide Manteca Unified School District with the results of the survey and recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable State and Federal laws pertaining to the protection of bird species. Mitigation Measure BIO-2: If active avian nests are identified during preconstruction surveys, a biological monitor shall be present on-site during all grubbing and clearing of vegetation to ensure that these activities remain within the project footprint (i.e. outside any nesting buffers) and that flagging/stakes/fencing that is erected to protect nests is maintained, and to minimize the likelihood that active nests are abandoned or fail due to project activities. The biological monitor shall send weekly monitoring reports to the Manteca Unified School District during the grubbing and clearing of vegetation, and shall notify Manteca Unified School District and CDFW immediately if project activities damage active avian nests. Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Should any vertical tubes, such as solar mount poles, chain link fencing poles, or any other hollow poles be utilized on site, the vertical pole shall be capped immediately after installation to prevent avian fatalities. Mitigation Measure BIO-4: If avoidance of the avian breeding season (February 15 to September 15) is not feasible, beginning thirty days prior to the initiation of project activities, a qualified biologist with experience in conducting breeding bird surveys conduct a bird survey to detect protected bird species occurring in suitable nesting habitat to be disturbed and (as access to adjacent areas allows) any other such habitat within 300 feet of the disturbance area (within 500 feet for raptors), and shall include


trees, vegetation, and small mammal burrows along the alignment. If a bird species are found, the project proponent should delay all project activities within 300 feet of on- and off-site suitable nesting habitat (within 500 feet for suitable raptor nesting habitat) until August 31. Alternatively, the qualified biologist could continue the surveys weekly in order to locate any nests. If a nest is located, project activities within 300 feet of the nest (within 500 feet for raptor nests) or as determined by a qualified biological monitor, must be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Flagging, stakes, and/or construction fencing should be used to demarcate the inside boundary of the buffer of 300 feet (or 500 feet) between the project activities and the nest. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on the sensitivity of the area. The biological monitor should provide the MUSD with the results of the survey and recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable State and Federal laws pertaining to the protection of bird species. b and c) NO IMPACT. There are no riparian, aquatic or sensitive habitat resources on the project site. The site lacks wetland hydrology, vegetation, and soils. The project would not impact riparian or wetland habitats. The project site is an active area that is regularly disturbed by high volume of foot and vehicular traffic. As indicated in the Manteca General Plan 2023 Draft EIR (p. 6-27), known native wildlife corridors passing through the Manteca Study Area do not exist. The proposed project site is surrounded by development to the north, south and east and would not support the existence of a wildlife movement corridor. Given the lack of known movement corridors on-site and within the vicinity of the project site, the project would have no impact on wildlife movement corridors. There is no essential fish habitat located on the project site. The project would not impede fish passage. Wildlife movement would not be impacted. No barriers will be installed that would prevent the movement of fish or wildlife. There would be no impact. e and f) NO IMPACT. Due to the proposed construction and operational plans for the proposed project, the project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. In addition, the project does not conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

5.

CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?

(b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?

(c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?

(d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?


Environmental Setting State and Federal legislation requires the protection of historical and cultural resources. In 1971, the President’s Executive Order No. 11593 required that all Federal agencies initiate procedures to preserve and maintain cultural resources by nomination and inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. In 1980, the Governor’s Executive Order No. B-64-80 required that State agencies inventory all “significant historic and cultural sites, structures, and objects under their jurisdiction which are over 50 years of age and which may qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.” Likewise, Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines specifies that “projects that cause the physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of a historical resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of the historic resource would be materially impaired” shall be found to have a significant impact on the environment. In September of 2014, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 52, which added provisions to the Public Resources Code (PRC) regarding the evaluation of impacts on tribal cultural resources under CEQA, and consultation requirements with California Native American tribes. In particular, AB 52 now requires lead agencies to analyze project impacts to “tribal cultural resources” separately from archaeological resources (PRC §21074; 21083.09). The Bill defines “tribal cultural resources” in a new section of the PRC §21074. AB 52 also requires lead agencies to engage in additional consultation procedures with respect to California Native American tribes (PRC §21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3). Impact Analysis a, b, and c) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED. C2 Consult requested a search of the Native American Heritage Commission’s (NAHC) database and asked the NAHC provide a list of Native American individuals and organizations affiliated with the project area. The list from the NAHC was received October 24, 2016. On October 24, 2016 notification letters were sent via certified mail to all tribal contacts, including a project description and a project map. No requests for consultation were received. After the 30-day period had passed, C2 Consult sent out a letter to recognize the 30-day period to request consultation under AB 52 and Section 106 of NHPA was closed. All AB 52 related communication is on file at Manteca Unified School District, 2271 W Louise Ave, Manteca, CA, or by contacting Aaron Bowers, at [email protected]. On November 10, 2016, Sierra Valley Cultural Planning (SVCP) archaeologist Douglas S. McIntosh completed a reconnaissance level archaeological survey of the project Area of Potential Effect (APE). The APE includes the Nile Garden Elementary School site, a proposed well site, and 13,400 feet (4,084 meters) of new distribution pipelines. No archaeological or other cultural resources were identified as a result of this cultural resources assessment. No Native American areas of concern were identified as a result of consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission and local Native American groups. Analysis of soil characteristics for the proposed sites suggests there is a moderately low probability of buried archaeological deposits within the APE. Therefore, it is unlikely that the proposed action will have an effect on important archaeological, historical, or other cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation is therefore recommended. In the unlikely event that buried archaeological deposits are encountered within the project area, the finds must be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Should human remains

mailto:[email protected]


be encountered, the County Coroner must be contacted immediately; if the remains are determined to be Native American, then the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted as well. To ensure any remains are not disturbed, mitigation measure MM CR-1 and MM CR-2 are recommended as a means to avoid potential impacts and to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures: MM CR-1: In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the County shall ensure that the following language is included in all permits in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e), subject to the review and approval of the Manteca Unified School District: If human remains are found during construction there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the coroner of San Joaquin County is contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendent (MLD) from the deceased Native American. The MLD may then make recommendations to the Lead Agency, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98. MM CR-2: If human remains of Native American origin are discovered during project construction, it is necessary to comply with State laws relating to the disposition of Native American burials, which fall within the jurisdiction of the Native American Heritage Commission (Public Resources Code §5097). If any human remains are discovered or recognized in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, which, according to the California Health and Safety Code Section 8100, consist of six or more human burials at one location, excavation or disturbance of the location must be halted in the vicinity of the find, and the County Coroner contacted. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent shall make recommendations regarding the treatment of the remains with appropriate dignity, which shall be carried out by the project contractor under supervision of a qualified archaeologist, hired at the Lead Agency’s expense. d) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED. No formal cemeteries or other places of human internment are known to exist at the site. In the event human remains are encountered during construction activities, all work within the vicinity of the remains would halt in accordance with Health and Safety Code §7050.5, PRC §5097.5, and §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the San Joaquin County Coroner’s office would be contacted. As such, potential impacts to human remains would not be very likely to occur as a result of the project. However, to ensure any remains are not disturbed, mitigation measure MM CR-1 and MM CR-2 above are recommended as a means to avoid potential impacts and to reduce impacts to a level of less than significant level.


6.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?

iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?

iv) Landslides?

(b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?

(c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?

(d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?

(e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?

Environmental Setting The project is located in central California, which is a region known to have fault zones and seismic activity. In the Manteca area, the major natural hazards include seismic activity and flooding. Aside from these, urban fires, and crime hazards are present due to ongoing human activities. Groundshaking: The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act was signed into California law on December 22, 1972 to mitigate the hazard of surface faulting to structures for human occupancy. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act's main purpose is to prevent the construction of buildings

used for human occupancy on the surface trace of active faults. The Act only addresses the hazard of surface fault rupture and is not directed toward other earthquake hazards. The Act only applies to structures for human occupancy (houses, apartments, condominiums, etc.) Soils and Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a process whereby soil is temporarily transformed to a fluid form during intense and prolonged groundshaking. Areas most prone to liquefaction are those that are water saturated (e.g., where the water table is less than 30 feet below the surface) and consist of relatively uniform sands that are low to medium density. In addition to necessary soil conditions, the ground acceleration and duration of the earthquake must be of sufficient energy to induce liquefaction. Landslides: Landslides are a primary geologic hazard and are influenced by four factors:

Strength of rock and resistance to failure, which is a function of rock type (or geologic formation);

Geologic structure or orientation of a surface along which slippage could occur;


Water (can add weight to a potentially unstable mass or influence strength of a potential failure surface); and,

Topography (amount of slope in combination with gravitation forces). The majority of Manteca is at approximately 36 feet in elevation. Slopes are less than 10 percent grade on the project site, which decreases the risk of soil erosion, the risk of landslides. Areas with fractured and steep slopes, where less consolidated or weathered soils overlie bedrock, have a higher risk of landslides. Expansive Soils: Soils have the potential to shrink or swell significantly with changes in moisture content are called expansive soils. These soils can limit the development capacity of an area, and may require significant construction modifications and excavation to replace existing materials with more stable soils. The amount of expansion (or contraction) of a soil is determined by the type and amount of the silt and clay content in the soil. Structural damage to buildings on expansive soils may result over long periods of time, usually from inadequate soils and foundation engineering, or the placement of structures directly on expansive soils. Seiche: A seiche is a wave in a reservoir, lake, or harbor that is seismically-induced. These waves have potential to damage shoreline structures, dams, and levees. The likelihood of damage from a seiche in the City of Manteca is a low concern. The effects from a seiche would be similar to the flood hazard for a particular area, and the risk of occurrence is perceived as being considerably less than the risk of flooding. Impact Analysis: ai-aiv and c) NO IMPACT. There are no known active earthquake faults in the project area. The closest active fault is the Fresno Fault northwest of Manteca. The State Geologist has not delineated any Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within or near the community of Manteca. Earthquake-induced ground failures, such as ruptures, lateral spreading, ground lurching, seiches, or mudslides, as well as liquefaction, are unlikely to occur at the project because of its relatively stable geologic formation, lack of slopes, and lack of active faults. There would be no impact. Areas with fractured and steep slopes, where less consolidated or weathered soils overlie bedrock, have a higher risk of landslides. Since the project site is located within a city containing less than a 10 percent grade these risks are substantially lower. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The project site is flat, and runoff during construction due to topography is unlikely. Project operation would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. To ensure that any runoff during construction is minimal and less than significant, standard erosion control measures prescribed by City of Manteca Public Works Department should be implemented. The impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d). NO IMPACT. The project site is not located on expansive soil. The project will be constructed to meet all applicable building and fire codes. There would be no impact.


Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. Waste water treatment systems are not a component of this project. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

7.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

(b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

Environmental Setting Global warming is a term used to refer to the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans in recent decades. Science is not unanimous about the cause of global warming. There is some science that suggests this is a cyclical phenomenon that has repeated itself over history (counteracted by periods of global cooling) and is therefore related to many naturally occurring events. However, there is other science that suggests that global warming may be related to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, specifically as a result of human activities, such as the consumption of fossil fuels for electricity production and transportation. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases (GHGs). The effect is analogous to the way a greenhouse retains heat. Common greenhouse gases include water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxides, chlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, ozone, and aerosols. Both natural processes and human activities emit greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gases are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. Of these gases, CO2 and CH4 are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. Emissions of CO2 are largely by-products of fossil fuel combustion, whereas CH4 results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and the decomposition of organic materials within landfills. Man-made GHGs, which have a much greater heat-absorption potential than CO2, include fluorinated gases, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), which are byproducts of certain industrial processes. Plants use carbon dioxide and water in photosynthesis and releases oxygen as a waste product. Humans use this oxygen to breathe and produce CO2 as a byproduct of respiration. The different types of GHGs have varying global warming potentials (GWPs). The GWP of a GHG is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere. Because GHGs absorb different amounts of heat, a common reference gas, usually carbon dioxide, is used to relate the amount of heat absorbed to the amount of the gas emissions, referred to as “CO2 equivalent,” and is the amount of a GHG emitted multiplied by its GWP. Carbon dioxide has a GWP of one. By contrast, methane (CH4) has a GWP of 21,


meaning its global warming effect is 21 times greater than carbon dioxide on a molecule per molecule basis.

Table 4. Global Warming Potentials (GWPs)

Gas Global Warming Potential

Carbon Dioxide 1

Methane 21

Nitrous Oxide 310

HFC-23 11,700

HFC-134a 1,300

HFC-152a 140

PFC: Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) 6,500

PFC: Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) 9,200

Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 23,900

Source: http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads09/Introduction.pdf

As noted above, the earth needs a certain amount of greenhouse gases in order to maintain a livable temperature. However, it is believed by many that global climate change may occur as a result of excess amounts of GHG, which, in turn, may result in significant adverse effects to the environment that will be experienced worldwide. The effects may include the melting of polar ice caps and rising sea levels, increased flooding in wet areas, droughts in arid areas, harsher storms, problems with agriculture, and the extinction of some animal species. Regardless of whether the rise in GHG is caused by natural cyclic events or not, it is widely believed production of additional GHG should be reduced in order to maintain a “healthy” level of GHG in the atmosphere. In response to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) the project’s greenhouse gas emissions must be evaluated under CEQA as required under Senate Bill 97 (2007). The Assembly Bill 32 Scoping Plan contains the main strategies California will use to reduce the greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The scoping plan has a range of GHG reduction actions which include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market-based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system, and an AB 32 program implementation regulation to fund the program. Impact Analysis a) LESS THAN SIGNIFCANT. The project will have direct GHG emissions associated with construction activity and by employees visiting the site for maintenance purposes. Indirect emissions will be associated with purchased electricity, and energy requirements related to ongoing operations at the site. Given the temporary nature of the construction activities and that the project will generate less than 5 vehicle trips per day, the projects impact to greenhouse gas emissions will be very small and less than significant. Impacts from the generation of greenhouse gases would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) NO IMPACT. Section 15064.4(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a lead agency to consider the “extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.”

http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm


In October of 2013, the City of Manteca adopted their Climate Action Plan (CAP), which is the City’s primary strategy for ensuring that the build-out of the General Plan 2023 supports the goals of AB 32. The CAP is designed to reduce community-related and City operations related greenhouse gas emissions to a degree that would not hinder or delay implementation of AB 32. San Joaquin County has not adopted a CAP. The CAP requires development projects constructed in the City of Manteca to achieve greenhouse gas emissions by taking the following actions:

Comply with the applicable land use, sustainable development, and resource conservation policies of the City of Manteca General Plan.

Construct project transportation infrastructure that supports walking, bicycling, and transit use.

Implement transportation demand management programs in projects with large numbers of employees.

Design and construct project buildings to exceed Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards by at least 10 percent.

Implement project buildings including water conservation measures that meet or exceed the California Green Building Code standards 20 percent requirement.

Install project landscaping that meets or exceeds water conservation standards of the City’s adopted landscaping ordinance 20 percent reduction requirement.

Develop programs to exceed state recycling and diversion targets by at least 10 percent. Given the nature of the proposed project, the above actions required by the CAP are not applicable to the project. The new well and extension of a water line will provide a clean drinking water to the Nile Garden Elementary School, which is in an emergency situation. The water line will not be large enough to allow new connections from existing or future residential development. Therefore, it can be determined that the proposed project does not conflict with the CAP. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

Would the project:


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?

(b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

(c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?

(d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?


(e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?

(f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?

(g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

(h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?


The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. Hazardous and non-hazardous wastes that are likely to be generated from project operation would most likely include, but is not limited to hydraulic fluids and solvents used in the operation of the water system equipment on the site and used during construction. All wastes would be required to be handled, stored, transported, and disposed of according to a framework of federal, state and local regulations. Regulatory bodies include, but are not limited to, the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control, San Joaquin County Environmental Health, U.S. and California Department of Transportation, and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Construction activities associated with the proposed project could involve the use of potentially hazardous materials, including cleaning materials, vehicle fuels, and oils. The operation of water treatment equipment is not typically associated with the routine transport, use, disposal, or generation of substantial amounts of hazardous materials. Impact Analysis a) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION. The applicant would be required to follow construction best management practices (BMPs), including the use of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, in accordance with manufacturer instructions and directions, proper containment and disposal of wastes at a permitted facility, and a personnel training program to minimize the potential for and effects of spills of hazardous contaminants during project operation. All hazardous wastes would be handled, transported, and disposed of according to the appropriate local, state, and federal regulations and guidance as described the County of San Joaquin General Plan, Health and Safety Element. The project is also subject to the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMP) as outlined in the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan. Pursuant to Sections 25117 and 25411 of the California Health and Safety Code, if reportable quantities of hazardous materials or waste will be handled or generated on the project site, a Hazardous Materials Business Plan is required to be filed with the County of San Joaquin.


The transportation of hazardous material or mixture containing a hazardous material is regulated through licensing requirements by the California Department of Motor Vehicles and through the vehicle code enforced by the California Highway Patrol. MM-HAZ-1: The following guidelines shall be followed during construction: • All equipment shall be routinely inspected for leaks and any leaks repaired immediately. • Any staging areas for fueling and maintenance of heavy equipment will be designated in the

final construction plans thereby limiting potential spills to designated areas where observation and clean up can be readily accomplished.

• Should an oil or fuel spill occur during construction or maintenance activities, all work would cease immediately, the County of San Joaquin would be notified, and clean up procedures would begin immediately.

• If hazardous materials are encountered during construction, all work is halted until the appropriate authorities have been notified and the area remediated.

b) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. It is not expected that the operation of the well and project equipment would result in the accidental release of hazardous materials. However, in the event of an accident at the project facilities in general, employees are trained in emergency procedures, fire extinguishers, CPR and First Aid, and other emergency precautions. The impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. c) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The project site is an elementary school. With the implementation of the Best Management Practices listed in 8.a above and MM-HAZ-1, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) NO IMPACT. A review of the Department of Toxic Substances Control database, EnviroStor, which includes lists of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5, did not identify the project site being a location that had used, stored, disposed of, or released hazardous materials. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. There are no airports located within two miles of the project site. The project is not located within the boundaries of the Stockton Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. f) NO IMPACT. There are no private airstrips within two miles of the project site. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. g) NO IMPACT. The project will not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an emergency response plan or evacuation plan. There would be no traffic closures during construction and operation of the project. There would be no impact.


Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. h) NO IMPACT. There are no wild lands located within or adjacent to the project area. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

9.

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?

(b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?

(c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?

(d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?

(e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?

(f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?

(g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?

(h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?

(i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?

(j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?

Environmental Setting The Plan for The Natural Environment of the City of Manteca General Plan 2023 identifies policies related to hydrology and water quality. Policies that are applicable to the proposed project are listed below:


The Plan for the Natural Environment requires that:

Wherever possible, the land ultimately required for each improvement (included in the

Drainage Master Plan) will be preserved before development occurs in an area.

Storm drainage and flood protection facilities should be constructed when each new

development begins.

Comply with the Regional Water Control Board’s regulations and standards to maintain and

improve groundwater and surface water quality in Manteca.

The project site is located within the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin, a closed basin situated within the northern San Joaquin Valley. It is located within the Tracy Subbasin (Groundwater Basin Number 5-22.15). The Tracy Subbasin is drained by the San Joaquin River and one of its major Westside tributaries, Corral Hollow Creek. The San Joaquin River flows northward into the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta and discharges into the San Francisco Bay. Annual precipitation within the subbasin ranges from about 11 inches in the south to about 16 inches in the north. No perennial streams exist within the project vicinity. There are no significant sources of surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. No waste will be generated by the project. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) NO IMPACT. The proposed new well will be 16 inches in diameter, 540 feet deep, and have up to 1,500 gallons per minute capacity. The capacity of the new well will replace the domestic water use from an existing well at the Nile Garden Elementary School. The existing well at the school will continue to operate, but will only be used for irrigation purposes. The overall water demand at the Nile Garden School will not increase with the implementation of the project. The proposed well adjacent to the park was generally evaluated and anticipated in Section 6.2 of the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the City of Manteca. Further, because the overall water demand will not change with the implementation of the project, it is not anticipated that the project would impact groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. c and d) NO IMPACT. There are no stormwater collection facilities on the site or in the vicinity. Once the project is constructed, the drainage pattern on the site will remain the same, and the finished grading work will improve drainage within the property and continue to direct it through the site allow percolation back into the ground. The project will not alter the course of a river or stream. The project will not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff that would result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on or off the project site.


e) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. There are no existing or planned storm drainage systems on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. The project will not provide any sources of polluted runoff. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. f) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not degrade water quality. Conversely, the project will provide a domestic water supply source that meets the drinking water standards and eliminates the existing water source at the campus which exceeds the allowable levels of arsenic. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. g and h) NO IMPACT. No housing will be constructed as a part of the project. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides information on flood hazards for communities based on its Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). According to FEMA (FIRM No. 06037C0400F, September 26, 2008) the proposed project site is located in Flood Zone X. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. i) NO IMPACT. According to Figure S-6 on Page S-48 of the Safety Element in the City of Manteca General Plan, the project site is not located within an inundation area. The project site is not located within any dam inundation areas identified in the City of Manteca Hazard Mitigation Plan. There would be no impacts related to exposure of people or structures to a risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dams. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. j) NO IMPACT. The proposed project site is located approximately 76 miles from the Pacific Ocean and distant from any large lakes. Inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow is also unlikely given the location of the project site. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

10.

LAND USE/PLANNING. Would the project:


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Physically divide an established community?


(b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?

(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?


The project site is an elementary school and is surrounded primarily by rural residential development. The zoning on the campus is P/F (Public) and the land use designation on the site is AG (General Agricultural) by the County of San Joaquin. The well site is zoned Planned Development Overlay (PD) and is designated Public (P/F) by the City of Manteca.

Impact Analysis

a) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not physically divide an established community. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) NO IMPACT. The proposed project is consistent with the zoning and general plan on the project site, and other plans adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The water lines and well are consistent with both the City of Manteca and County of San Joaquin municipal codes. All environmental impacts identified in this report are either less than significant or can be mitigates to a level of less than significance. There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

c) NO IMPACT. The project site is located within the boundaries of the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The SJMSCP was developed to minimize and mitigate impacts to plant and wildlife habitat resulting from the conversion of 109,302 acres of open space to non-open space use to occur in San Joaquin County between 2001 and 2051. Ninety-seven species are covered by the SJMSCP, which is intended to provide comprehensive mitigation, pursuant to local, state and federal regulations, for impacts to these species from SJMSCP permitted activities. The proposed project will not convert any of the habitat types identified in the plan that require compensation, including agricultural lands, natural lands – non wetlands, natural lands – vernal pools within vernal pool zone, or natural lands – wetlands other than vernal pools. Therefore, it can be determined that the project is consistent with the SJMSCP and no mitigation is required. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

11.

MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact


(a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?

(b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?

Environmental Setting Mineral resources include commercially viable oil and gas deposits, and nonfuel mineral resources deposits. Nonfuel mineral resources include metals such as gold, silver, iron, and copper; industrial metals such as boron compounds, rare-earth elements, clays, limestone, gypsum, salt, and dimension stone; and construction aggregate, including sand, gravel, and crushed stone. California is the largest producer of sand and gravel in the nation and the County of San Joaquin is a leading producer for its geographical size. Major sand and gravel extraction areas are located in northern San Joaquin County in other washes. The project site is located within the city limits of Manteca, which has no significant resources within its limits. The site is designated as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ)-1 and MRZ-3 by the California Department of Conservation, State Geologist. MRZ-1 is defined as areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. MRZ-3 is defined as areas containing mineral deposits the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data. The project site has no immediate mineral resources within a two mile radius of the general vicinity. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource, as none are known to be located on the project site. The applicants are not proposing development of mineral resources on the site. The project will not result in impacts to mineral resources. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) NO IMPACT. The project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource, as it is not designated in the City of Manteca General Plan as a mineral recovery site. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

12.

NOISE. Would the project result in: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

(b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?


(c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?

(d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?

(e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

(f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

Environmental Setting Noise is commonly defined as undesirable or unwanted sound. Noises vary widely in their scope, source, and volume, ranging from individual occurrences such as leaf blowers, to the intermittent disturbances of overhead aircraft, to the fairly constant noise generated by traffic on freeways. Three aspects of community noise are used in assessing the noise environment: Level (e.g., magnitude or loudness): Sound levels are measured and expressed in decibels (dB) with 10 dB roughly equal to the threshold of hearing. Figure 9-1 shows the decibel levels associated with different common sounds. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A-weighted noise level (dBA). Frequency composition or spectrum: Frequency is a measure of the pressure fluctuations per second, measured in units of hertz (Hz). The characterization of sound level magnitude with respect to frequency is the sound spectrum, often described in octave bands, which divide the audible human frequency range (e.g., from 20 to 20,000 Hz) into 10 segments. Variation in sound level with time, measured as noise exposure: Most community noise is produced by many distant noise sources that change gradually throughout the day and produce a relatively steady background noise having no identifiable source. Identifiable events of brief duration, such as aircraft flyovers, cause the community noise level to vary from instant to instant. A single number called the equivalent sound level, or Leq, describes the average noise exposure level over a period of time. Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels. The major noise sources in Manteca are related to vehicle traffic, commercial activities, and residential activities. Noise sources on the project site include noise generated by school activities, such as recess and sporting events, which are intermittent and temporary in nature. According to common practice, maximum noise levels of 60 dB are considered “normally acceptable” for unshielded residential development. Noise levels from 60 dB to 70 dB fall within the “conditionally unacceptable” range, and those in the 70 to 75 dB range are considered “normally unacceptable”. Regulating environmental noise is generally the responsibility of local governments. However, California Government Code Section 53091 Section (d) states the following:

(d) Building ordinances of a county or city shall not apply to the location or construction of facilities for the production, generation, storage, treatment, or transmission of water, wastewater, or electrical energy by a local agency.


Impact Analysis a through d) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of the Nile Garden Elementary School to the City of Manteca water system. For the majority of the project, construction will occur during weekdays during day light hours. However, during the drilling of the new well at Palmer Park, construction may take place on weekends, in addition to weekdays, and may occur 24 hours a day. The well drilling, zone sampling, and final well construction activities will require around the clock construction. The drilling and sampling do not stop once started, as stopping may compromise the construction of the well. Construction equipment may include a backhoe, loader, trucks, etc. Use of such equipment will result in temporary noise over existing ambient levels. There will be no permanent or periodic increase in ambient noise levels as a result of the project. The project will expose people to a temporary increase in nose level in the vicinity of the new well site, with a potential exposure to temporary groundbourne vibrations depending on the distance the receptor is from the well site. All exposure to noise or vibrations would be temporary in nature and will cease with the operation of the new well. Construction at the school site will occur during the summer months when school is not in session. Any generation of excessive noise, groundborne vibration, or groundborne noise would be temporary. The impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e and f) NO IMPACT. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport, and there are no private airstrips in the project vicinity, and would not expose people in the project area to excessive noise levels. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

13.

POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:


Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?

(b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

(c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

Environmental Setting Manteca is consistent with many other central valley suburbs of large cities consisting of a mixture of retail, public facilities, and older residential neighborhoods. Newer and larger residential neighborhoods


and regional commercial centers are continuing to be constructed to accommodate for the influx of population in recent years. Parks and schools are distributed throughout residential neighborhoods within the city. The population of Manteca in 2015 was just under 76,000, and there were approximately 23,132 housing units in 2010. Single family homes are the predominant housing type in Manteca, and approximately 60 percent of households in Manteca are owned rather than rented by the residents. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will provide reliable drinking water at the Nile Garden Elementary School and will not induce or facilitate growth of the student population on the campus, which could result in substantial population growth in the area. Further, the waterline that will be extended to school from the gate-valve at the intersection of Peach Road and Union Road will be 4 inches in diameter, and is not large enough to serve residential development or future residential subdivisions or commercial projects along the APE. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b and c) NO IMPACT. The project site is located within the existing elementary school campus, in existing roadways, and a disturbed area in a community park. There is no existing housing on the project site. There would no need for replacement housing. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

14.

PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

i) Fire Protection?

ii) Police Protection?

iii) Schools?

iv) Parks?

v) Other public facilities?



Law enforcement services are provided by Manteca Police Department. Fire and emergency response units are provided by the City of Manteca Fire Department. The project side includes a school, and the new well will be constructed adjacent to Palmer Park. Impact Analysis ai-v) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will create reliable drinking water on the school campus, and will not induce or facilitate growth of the student population on the campus or in the project vicinity, which would result in the need for additional public services. No new police or fire services will be necessary to operate the project, and the project will not require additional schools or parks. The project will not result in a substantial adverse physical impact or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for the following public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

15.

RECREATION. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

(b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?

Environmental Setting Currently, Manteca has 3 city parks plus other community facilities. These facilities have facilities that range from swimming pools, family picnic areas, pavilions, barbecue pits, sinks, tables and benches, soccer fields, children's play areas, and restrooms. With a 2015 population of 75,448 residents, the City has a ratio of 9 acres of parkland per 3,200 residents. Trails, community facilities and pocket parks do not contribute to the ratio. Palmer Park is adjacent to the project site where the new well will be constructed. No other recreational facilities are in the vicinity of the project site. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the


domestic water supply on campus. The project will not increase in the use of neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not create substantial physical deterioration of any park facilities. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) NO IMPACT. The project does not include recreational facilities or require new facilities. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

16.

TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?

(b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?

(c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?

(d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e. g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

(e) Result in inadequate emergency access?

(f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?

Environmental Setting The community of Manteca is served by two major highways, State Route 99, a north/south route and State Route 120, an east/west route. State Route 99 in northern San Joaquin County is a four-lane conventional highway. SR 14 serves as a main route for local circulation within the Manteca area, and provides access to the recreational points and other points of interest within the area. SR 99 runs through the communities of Manteca and other major communities within the county. State Route 120 is a four-lane highway through San Joaquin County and serves as the primary link between eastern California and the southern section of the Manteca area. State Route 120 has also become a major commuting link between the eastern and western sections of Manteca and other neighboring and local communities.


The following is a description of the roadways within the project APE:

Table 5. Project Site Roadway Information

Street Name Master Plan Designation* Lanes Speed Limit at Project Site

E Woodward Avenue Major Two 45 MPH

Oleander Avenue Local Two Not Posted

E Peach Road Local Two 35 MPH

Union Road Major Two 55 MPH

Nile Road Local Two 25 MPH when Children are

Present

*City of Manteca Designation Public transit is provided by Manteca Transit. There are three routes overall serving Manteca. Services are available in the mornings, afternoons, and evenings and are available six days a week. Manteca also has a “dial-a-ride” program available on demand in three different zones. The nearest transit stop to the project site is located at the intersection of W Atherton Drive and Sand Lane. Impact Analysis a and b) NO IMPACT. Project operation would not result in an increase in vehicle trips that would result in impacts to traffic or transportation. During construction, vehicle traffic will temporarily increase due to construction-related vehicles moving to and from the work site. The project will not conflict with any plans, ordinances, or policies related to traffic or transportation. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. c) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not impact air traffic patterns. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) NO IMPACT. Construction of the project will not result in any changes to road designs or introduce incompatible uses within the project area. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. The construction of the project will not require any road closures. Traffic control may be necessary to install the water lines within the roadways in the project area, however roads will never be fully closed and the traffic control will be temporary. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.


f) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project does not involve or impact alternative transportation and will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. There are no transit stops or bicycle facilities within the APE. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

17.

UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?

(b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment or collection facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?

(c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?

(d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?

(e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?

(f) Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?

(g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes?

(h) Have significant effects on energy resources as described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines?

Environmental Setting Pacific Gas and Electric provides electric service to the project site. Waste Management is responsible for garbage collection in the City of Manteca. The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Water service is currently provided to the school via an on-site well. Impact Analysis a) NO IMPACT. The project will not generate wastewater, as the focus of the project is on connecting the Nile Garden Elementary School to a new domestic water supply and separating the


domestic/irrigation water sources. The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. b) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED. The proposed project will not result in the construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment or collection facilities, as this project focuses on providing drinking water to the Nile Garden Elementary School and the separation of domestic and irrigation water sources. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The potential environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the new water source and separate domestic/irrigation systems are evaluated in this document. Potentially significant impacts in the resources areas of visual resources, biological resources, cultural resources, hazardous materials, and noise are identified and mitigated to a level of less than significance, with the mitigation measures outlined in this report. With the implementation of mitigation measures, AES-1, CR-1 thru CR-2, BIO-1 thru BIO-4, and HAZ-1, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: AES-1, CR-1 thru CR-2, BIO-1 thru BIO-4, and HAZ-1. c) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will not generate new sources or expand existing sources of storm water runoff. No new facilities or expansion of existing facilities would be required as a result of this project. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. d) NO IMPACT. The current water demand at the school will not increase. Potable water needs at the school site will be met with the water supply from the proposed new well. The existing well at the school will continue to be used for irrigation. The new well will replace water used by the school to meet potable needs The new well was anticipated in section 6.2 of the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the City of Manteca. No new or expanded entitlements will be needed. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. e) NO IMPACT. The project will not utilize public sewer or impact the capacity of a waste water treatment system. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. f) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not result in the generation of new sources of solid waste. The project will not impact the capacity of a landfill. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.


g) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. Any waste generated by project construction will be disposed of in the appropriate and required manner. The project will not conflict with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. h) NO IMPACT. The project includes the construction of a new well and equipment building, new waterlines, the installation of tank, pumps, and support equipment, and the connection of a school to the City of Manteca water system. The project will also separate non-potable water uses from the domestic water supply on campus. The project will not require significant energy resources. There would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.

18.

MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially

Significant Impact


With Mitigation

Incorporated


Impact No

Impact

(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?

(b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?)

(c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?

Impact Analysis a) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. While it was determined that the project construction would not degrade the quality of the environment, mitigation measures are included to minimize impacts. Further, a search at the California Historic Resource Information Center revealed no reported resources on the site, and further investigation was not recommended. However, the possibility exists that subsurface excavation could result in the discovery of cultural resources. The mitigation measures included in this Initial Study would reduce any potential impacts to a less than significant level. Therefore the proposed project would have a less than significant impacts to the quality of the environment, plant and wildlife species, and important examples of California history or prehistory. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.


b) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The majority of the potential impacts resulting from the project would be short term, occurring during project construction, with negligible impacts resulting from project operation as discussed in the above environmental analysis. However, this project along with other development in the County of San Joaquin could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. Therefore, any resulting cumulative impacts will be reduced to less than significant level by implementing the mitigation measures identified in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ultimately, any cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable. c) LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The project would not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation measures are provided to reduce the project’s potential effect on aesthetics, cultural resources, and hazardous materials, below the level of significance. No additional mitigation measures would be required. Adverse effects on human beings resulting from implementation of the project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable.


Section 5. REFERENCES California Department of Conservation. Fault Activity Map of California. N.p., n.d. Web. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/ California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). Computer based search for the Stockton West, Stockton East, Salida, Ripon, Lathrop, Manteca, Peters, Avena, and Vernalis USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle Maps, Oct 2016. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, http://www.fire.ca.gov/about/about.php California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. IADAM Air Quality Data Statistics. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Sep. 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/

California Native Plant Society. Rare Plant Program. 2016. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). CNPS, Sacramento, CA. Web. www.rareplants.cnps.org. Accessed Sept 12, 2016. California Office of Planning and Research. 2016 CEQA Guidelines. California Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker for Leaking Fuel Tank Site database. California Department of Water Resources. California Groundwater: Bulletin 118. 2003. City of Manteca, General Plan 2023 N.p., 6 Oct. 2003. Web. September- October 2016. http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/mantecatransit/ City of Manteca. General Plan. October 2003. https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Documents/City%20of%20Manteca%20General%20Plan.pdf City of Manteca. Hazard Mitigation Plan. September 2009 https://www.sjgov.org/oes/getplan/sj_hazard_mitigation_plan.pdf City of Manteca, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/5649930655/Manteca_2015_UWMP-Final.pdf City of Manteca. Zoning Plans. 17 February 2002. http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/communitydevelopment/Documents/ZoningCode_Combined120611.pdf County of San Joaquin. General Plan Policy Document, Public Review Draft, October 2014. Construction Equipment Noise Levels, http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist11/I15managed/I-15/figures/chapter3/3-23.pdf visited January 14, 2012. County of San Joaquin Valley Fire Department. "Compliance Guideline for Hazardous Wastes and Materials." (n.d.): n. pag. Compliance Guideline for Hazardous Wastes and Materials. 3 Dec. 2009. Web. September 2016.

http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/

http://www.fire.ca.gov/about/about.php

http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/

http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/

http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/mantecatransit/

https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Documents/City%20of%20Manteca%20General%20Plan.pdf

https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Documents/City%20of%20Manteca%20General%20Plan.pdf

https://www.sjgov.org/oes/getplan/sj_hazard_mitigation_plan.pdf

https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/5649930655/Manteca_2015_UWMP-Final.pdf

https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/public/uwmp_attachments/5649930655/Manteca_2015_UWMP-Final.pdf

http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/communitydevelopment/Documents/ZoningCode_Combined120611.pdf

http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist11/I15managed/I-15/figures/chapter3/3-23.pdf

http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist11/I15managed/I-15/figures/chapter3/3-23.pdf


Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resources Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. California Farmland Conversion Report 2015. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Index.aspx Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Watershed Coordinator Grant Program, Hydrologic Regions. 2007. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA Flood Map Service Center: Search By Address." N.p., n.d. Web. September- October 2016. https://msc.fema.gov/ Manteca Transit Authority. Web. October 2016. http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/mantecatransit/ San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, California Environmental Quality Act and Federal Conformity Guidelines. September 2016. http://www.valleyair.org/Home.htm USFWS 2016. Information for Planning and Conservation (IPAC). Computer based search for the project site, Consultation Code 08ECAR00-2016-SLI-0758. September 2016. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/

United States Geological Survey. Geologic Maps. https://www.usgs.gov/products/maps/geologic-maps Zeiner, D.C., W.F.Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife. Vol. I-III. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Index.aspx

https://msc.fema.gov/

http://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/mantecatransit/

http://www.valleyair.org/Home.htm

https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/

https://www.usgs.gov/products/maps/geologic-maps

Nile Garden Elementary School Water Supply Pipeline Project Appendix 1

Appendix A Project Maps

Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Location Map Figure 3 – Project Map

Figure 4 – Project Map – Nile Garden Elementary School Site Figure 5 – Project Map – Nile Garden Elementary School Site


Figure 3 – Project Map


Figure 4 – Project Map – Nile Garden Site


Figure 5 – Project Map – Nile Garden Site


Appendix B Site Photos


Photo 1. Well Site

Photo 2. Well Site


Photo 3. Typical Road APE Construction Site



Photo 5. Nile Garden Elementary School – APE

Photo 6. Nile Garden Elementary School – APE


Appendix C CalEEMod 2013.2.2 Air Quality Analysis


Appendix D

Biological Resources Report

Biological Resources Report for the

Nile Garden Water Supply Project Manteca, California

March 2017

Lead Agency:



2271 W Louise Ave

Manteca, California 95337

209-825-3200

Prepared by: C2 Consult, Corp

2125 Kern Street Ste 301

Fresno, Ca. 93721 720-502-7236

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1

2.0 Regulations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3

3.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9

4.0 Resource Issues…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

5.0 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13

6.0 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14

Appendix A Site Photos

Appendix B Agency Special Status Species Lists

Nile Garden Biological Resources Report Page 1 C2 Consult, Corp

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The project is an upgrade to an existing water system to address water quality issues, specifically

arsenic, at the Nile Garden Elementary School, within the Manteca Unified School District (MUSD) in

Manteca, California (Figures 1 and 2). The project includes a new well (Well 30) located at Palmer Park,

new water lines, and new treatment equipment at the Nile Garden School (Figures 3-5). Domestic

supply at the school will utilize water from the new Well 30. The existing well at the Nile Garden

Elementary School will be converted to only serve non-potable uses.

A new well (Well 30), owned and operated by the City of Manteca, will be constructed within the City of

Manteca limits at Palmer Park on Sephos Street. The new well will be 16-inchs in diameter, 540 feet

deep, and have a capacity of up to 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm).

The Project will also construct a 12-inch water main loop within the City of Manteca limits on Oleander

Road (between Woodward Avenue and Peach Road), on Peach Road (between Oleander Road and

Union Road), and on Union Road (between Woodward Avenue and Peach Road). The 12-in pipe will be

approximately 7,200 feet, and will be owned and operated by the City of Manteca. In addition, a

connection to the city waterline, including a gate-valve, water meter and box, and backflow preventer

will be installed at the corner of Union Road and Peach Road. The meter will be owned and maintained

by the City of Manteca and the backflow preventer will be owned and maintained by Manteca Unified

School District. All lines south of this connection will be owned, maintained, and operated by MUSD.

The Project will also construct a 4-inch waterline, approximately 6,600 feet, from the meter located at

Peach Road and Union Road, south along Union Road and then west on Nile Avenue to the Nile Garden

School. The 4-in waterline is outside the city limits of Manteca, and will be the responsibility of the

MUSD to own, operate, and maintain.

The Project will provide new waterlines and connections as necessary on the School campus to separate

potable water uses from landscape uses. All potable water uses will be supplied from the City of

Manteca meter, and all non-potable water uses will be supplied by the existing school wells. The school

is currently served by two wells and one 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic tank. A new 10,000 gallon water

tank, along with booster pumps, will be constructed.

Approximately 7,200 feet of 12-inch waterline and 6,600 feet of 4-inch waterline will be installed in

existing road rights-of-ways within the following roadways:

Oleander Avenue – 12 inch water line

Peach Road – 12 inch water line

Union Road – 12 inch north of Peach Road, 4 inch water line south of Peach Road

Nile Road – 4 inch water line

The Nile Garden Elementary School is located on a 15.3 acre site. The Nile Garden School has a

population of 535, and is projected to grow to 550 students. The zoning on the campus is P/F (Public)

and the land use designation on the site is AG (General Agricultural) by the County of San Joaquin. The


well site is zoned Planned Development Overlay (PD) and is designated Public (P/F) by the City of

Manteca.

In addition to the above, fire hydrants will be installed along the 12 inch water line. No fire hydrants will

be installed south of the meter located at Peach and Union Road.

Project Objective

The project objective is to allow Nile Garden Elementary School to comply with the drinking water

regulations and to obtain a new water source to solve the arsenic non-compliance issue at the school

site. The project will provide a reliable water supply with water quality meeting the arsenic drinking

water standards to the Nile Garden Elementary School.

In 2015, the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission approved an emergency out-of-agency

water connection from the City of Manteca to the Nile Garden Elementary School. The connection was

approved due to the health risk associated with excess levels of arsenic in the school’s water supply,

which exceed the State arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 0.010 mg/L (equivalent to 10

micrograms per liter, μg/L).

Project Location

The City of Manteca is located at the junction of State Route 99 and State Route120, approximately 75

miles east of San Francisco and 55 miles south of Sacramento. Manteca is located approximately 12

miles south of downtown Stockton, and 14 miles northwest of the City of Modesto. The project is

located south of State Route 120 and west of State Route 99.

The project will occur on the campus of the Nile Garden Elementary School, which is located at 5700 E

Nile Rd (Assessor’s Parcel Number 22607003). The project will also take place on portions of Oleander

Avenue, Woodward Avenue, Peach Road, and Union Road. The project is located in both the City of

Manteca and in San Joaquin County. All project activities south of Peach Road occur within San Joaquin

County, and activities north of Peach Road occur within the Manteca city limits. The project activities

proposed in San Joaquin County are within the City of Manteca Sphere of Influence.

In total the overall project site is located across a span of 2 miles. Nile Garden Elementary School is

found on the USGS 7.5’ Manteca (2015) Quadrangle map. The project is located in Sections 2 and 18,

Township 2S, Range 7E MDB&M. The project site is at approximately 35 feet above sea level, and the

topography is flat.

Construction Activities

Construction staging will be located in several areas on and near the elementary school campus and the

roadways near the school. Staging areas are where the construction equipment, materials, and trailer

office (if necessary) would be stored and where construction workers would park their personal

vehicles. Laydown areas along the pipeline route would also be used to store materials. The laydown


areas vary in size. The areas would be kept clean and restored to their original condition after

construction is complete.

Open cut trenching would be utilized for most of the pipeline alignment and for tank and booster pump

installation at the water treatment facility, with the exception of areas where pipe will be placed in the

ground by horizontal directional drilling (HDD). Pipe segments will be placed along the right-of-way

adjacent to the trench alignment. Open-cut trenching will be performed using construction equipment

to excavate the trench alignment, temporarily placing excavated material within the easement adjacent

to the trench. The trench for the pipeline will be approximately 4 feet deep and 3 feet wide. The trench

excavator (back hoe) will be used to place the pipe segment into the trench. The joints will be slip joint

bell and spigot polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or ductile iron standard water pipe. The excavated material will

be used to backfill the trench to pre-project conditions.

2.0 REGULATIONS

The Manteca Unified School District, acting as a Lead Agency, can use information in this report to

support the CEQA process, and for Section 7 and Section 10 consultation with the USFWS and NMFS

under the FESA. Recommendations in the report can be used for mitigation measures and/or conditions

of approval.

Federal and state endangered species legislation gives special status to several plant and animal species

known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. In addition, state resource agencies and professional

organizations, whose lists are recognized by agencies when reviewing environmental documents, have

identified as sensitive some species occurring in the vicinity of the project site. Such special-status

species include plants and animals listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as threatened or

endangered under the FESA or the California Endangered Species Act (CESA); animals listed as “fully

protected” under the California Fish and Game Code; animals designated as “Species of Special

Concern” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); and plants listed as rare or

endangered by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS).


Federal Endangered Species Act

FESA provisions protect federally listed threatened and endangered species and their habitats from

unlawful take. Under the FESA, “take” is defined as “to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,

trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any of the specifically enumerated conduct.”

Regulations of the USFWS define harm to mean “an act which actually kills or injures wildlife.” Such an

act “may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife

by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering” (50

CFR § 17.3). The USFWS regulates activities that may result in “take” of individuals. The USFWS

periodically produces an updated list of candidate species. Candidate species are not afforded any legal

protection under FESA; however, candidate species typically receive special attention from federal and

state agencies during the environmental review process.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

The USFWS also uses the label Species of Concern as an informal term that refers to those species that

might be in need of concentrated conservation actions. Species of Concern receive no legal protection

as a result of their designation, and the use of the term does not necessarily mean that the species will

eventually be proposed for listing as a threatened or endangered species. Most, if not all, of these

species are currently protected by state and federal laws.

California Endangered Species Act

Provisions of the CESA protect state-listed threatened and endangered species. The CDFW regulates

activities that may result in “take” of individuals (i.e., to “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt

to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill”). Habitat degradation or modification is not expressly included in

the definition of “take” under the California Fish and Game Code. Additionally, the California Fish and

Game Code contains lists of vertebrate species designated as “fully protected” (California Fish & Game

Code §§ 3511 [birds], 4700 [mammals], 5050 [reptiles and amphibians], 5515 [fish]). Such species may

not be taken or possessed.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) have responsibility under CEQA for commenting

on projects that could impact plant and wildlife resources. Pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section

1802, the CDFW has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife,

native plants, and the habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. As a

Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources, the CDFW is responsible for providing, as available,

biological expertise arising from project activities, as those terms are used under CEQA (Division 13

[commencing with section 21000] of the Public Resources Code).

The CDFW has regulatory authority over a project that could result in the “take” of any species listed by

the State as threatened or endangered, pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081. If the project


could result in the take of any species listed as threatened or endangered under CESA, the CDFW may

need to issue an Incidental Take Permit for the project.

Migratory Birds

Raptors (e.g., eagles, hawks, and owls) and their nests are protected under both federal and state

regulations. The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits killing, possessing, or trading in

migratory birds except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior. This

act encompasses whole birds, parts of birds, and bird nests and eggs. Birds of prey are protected in

California under the State Fish and Game Code. Section 3503.5 states it is “unlawful to take, possess, or

destroy any birds in the order Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds of prey) or to take, possess, or

destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this Code or any regulation

adopted pursuant thereto.” California Fish and Game Code Section 3503 prohibit the take of all birds

and their nests, and Section 3513 protects the unlawful take of any migratory non-game bird.

Construction disturbance during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or

nestlings or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or

loss of reproductive effort is considered “take” by the CDFW.

Vascular Plants

The CNPS initially created five California Rare Plant Ranks (CRPR) in an effort to categorize degrees of

concern; however, in order to better define and categorize rarity in California's flora, the CNPS Rare

Plant Program and Rare Plant Program Committee have developed the following:

California Rare Plant Rank 1A: Plants Presumed Extirpated in California and Either Rare or Extinct

Elsewhere - meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California

Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing.

California Rare Plant Rank 1B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and

Elsewhere - meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California

Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing.

California Rare Plant Rank 2A: Plants Presumed Extirpated in California, But Common Elsewhere

- meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Department of

receive Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing.

California Rare Plant Rank 2B: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More

Common Elsewhere - meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the

California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing.

California Rare Plant Rank 3: Plants About Which More Information is Needed, A Review List -

meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Department of

Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing.

California Rare Plant Rank 4: Plants of Limited Distribution, A Watch List - Some of the plants

constituting California Rare Plant Rank 4 meet the definitions of the California Endangered

Species Act of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and few, if any, are eligible for

state listing. CNPS recommend that Rank 4 plants be evaluated for impact significance during


preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA, or those considered to be

functionally equivalent to CEQA, based on CEQA Guidelines §15125 (c) and/or §15380.

California Rare Plant Rank - Threat Ranks

0.1- Seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and

immediacy of threat).

0.2- Moderately threatened in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree

and immediacy of threat).

0.3- Not very threatened in California (less than 20% of occurrences threatened / low degree

and immediacy of threat or no current threats known).

Listing Status

Many state and federal agencies and entities assign “status” to plant and animal species. This includes

the USFWS, the CDFW, and the CNPS, along with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the Bureau of Land

Management (BLM), and others. However, under CEQA and NEPA, species need only be considered if

they are listed as any of the following:

Listed by the USFWS or the CDFW,

Listed under FESA and/or CESA,

Listed with a California Rare Plant Rank of 1, 2 or 3 (some with a rank of 4 may be considered),

Is a species that isn’t listed on a State or Federal endangered species list, but can be shown to

meet the criteria for Endangered, Rare, or Threatened as specified in the CEQA Guidelines,

Listed by CDFW as a Species of Special Concern or Fully Protected, or

Listed by the USFWS as a Bird Species of Special Concern.

Wetlands and Streams

Wetlands and permanent and intermittent drainages, creeks, and streams identified as waters of the US

are generally subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) under Section 404

of the Federal Clean Water Act. Streambeds are subject to regulation by the CDFW under Section 1602

of the California Fish and Game Code. A stream is defined under these regulations as a body of water

that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and that

supports fish or other aquatic life. This definition includes watercourses having a surface or subsurface

flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation. CDFW jurisdiction typically extends to the edge

of the riparian vegetation canopy.

Potential wetlands on the project site were evaluated using the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Wetlands Delineation Manual. Based on this manual, to meet the definition of a “wetland”, all of the

following must be true: an area five feet in diameter must be dominated by wetland plants (obligate or

facultative wetland species), have hydrologic conditions that allow water to saturate the soil for several

weeks per year, and contain hydric soils.


The State of California uses a broader definition of wetlands. In conjunction with adopting a wetlands

policy on March 9, 1987 the California Fish and Game Commission assigned the Department of Fish and

Wildlife the task of recommending a wetlands definition. The CDFW found the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service wetland definition and classification system based on the Cowardin definition to be the most

biologically valid. The CDFW staff use this definition as a guide in identifying wetlands while conducting

on-site inspections for the implementation of its Commission's wetlands policy. Like the Army Corps of

Engineers definition, the USFWS definition (Cowardin, et al., 1979) of a wetland incorporates the three

key parameters of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology:

Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually

at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For the purpose of this classification,

wetlands must have one or more of the following attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land supports

predominantly hydrophytes; (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil; (3) the substrate is

non-soil and is saturated or covered with shallow water at some time during the growing season of each

year (Cowardin et al. 1979:3).

The main difference between the federal and state definition of a wetlands is, under some

circumstances, only one of the three federal criteria need be met.

Oak Woodlands

Under State Public Resources Code (PRC) 21083.4, counties administering CEQA must consider

mitigation for oak woodland impacted by the project. This PRC is state law which requires a county to

establish a method for requiring oak woodland mitigation. Oak woodland is defined as project site land

where a majority of living trees are native oaks and with 10 percent or greater oak canopy cover.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

The objective of this report is to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact the

following resource areas:

Aquatic/riparian habitat and wetlands

Sensitive animal species

Migratory and nesting birds

Sensitive plant species

Oak woodland resources

A site visit was completed on August 10, 2016. A total of 4 hours were spent on site surveys and

species/habitat identification. Site photos can be found in Appendix A.

Prior to conducting a field survey, C2 Consult staff reviewed the following resources:

Aerial photographs of the survey area;

Project engineering drawings;

Manteca USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle;


Soil Survey information, Natural Resource Conservation Service;

USFWS IPaC Planning Tool/Species List ;

A California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare and Endangered Plant Inventory plants with the

potential to occur within the Manteca USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle and the surrounding eight

quadrangles (Stockton West, Stockton East, Peters, Ripon, Lathrop, Salida, Vernalis, Avena US);

and

A California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) list of state and federally listed special-status

species with potential to occur within the Manteca USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle and the

surrounding eight quadrangles (Stockton West, Stockton East, Peters, Ripon, Lathrop, Salida,

Vernalis, Avena US) (CDFW 2016).

The CNDDB, IPaC, USFWS, and CNPS list of state and federally listed special-status species with potential

to occur within the Manteca 7.5-minute quadrangle and the surrounding eight quadrangles initially

returned 54 species and four sensitive habitats with occurrence reports in those quadrangle map areas

or in San Joaquin County, or may be present (see Appendix B for full list). After reviewing the list and

eliminating species that have no habitat in the project site, and all plants and animals with status listings

not required for evaluation under CEQA and NEPA, one species was evaluated for presence or absence

during the site visit. Specific reasons for not evaluating a species are listed in Appendix B. Critical habitat

was identified in the area of the project site for the Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus).

3.1 Site Conditions

The subject site is located in the center area of the Sacramento Valley. The Sacramento Valley is a broad

structural trough bound to the north by the Cascade and Klamath Ranges, bound to the east by the

Sierra Nevada Range and bound to the west by the Coast Ranges of California. The Sacramento Valley,

which comprises the northern portion of the Great Valley on California, has been filled with tens to

thousands of feet of sedimentary deposits, dependent on location.

The site Area of Potential Effect (APE) spans approximately 2 miles, and includes the roadways identified

in the project description, along with the well site and the Nile Garden School. The roadways involved in

the project are paved and adjacent to residential and agricultural development. The well site is on a

disturbed area of a street corner, bound by a paved street, a community park, and a construction site

where homes are under construction. The well site contains piles of excavated dirt and ruderal roadside

vegetation. The Nile Garden School site is developed with classrooms, paved surfaces, ball fields, and

landscaping. The overall site is generally flat with no change in topography, and is completed developed

or disturbed.

Soil Information

Soils on the project site, according to the U.S. Department of Agricultural Natural Resource Conservation

Service are the following:

Tinnin loamy coarse sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (255)

Veritas fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (266)


The project is located within the San Joaquin River Hydrological Region. The project site is found in

Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Rate Insurance Map Zone X (06077C0640F).

4.0 RESOURCE ISSUES

4.1 Aquatic Habitat and Wetlands

There are no aquatic resources or wetland habitat present on the project site. The project would not

impact streams, drainages, wetlands, vernal pools, or other aquatic habitat. There would be no impact.

4.2 Special Status Animals

C2 completed a review of the potential sensitive animal species that have been found in Tuolumne

County, the USGS Sonora Quadrangle, and surrounding 8 quadrangles. Thirty-two animal species had

occurrence records in those areas. Of the 32 species, 31 are found exclusively in habitat not found on

the project site, or do not have a listing status required to be evaluated under the FESA, CESA, CEQA,

and NEPA. Reasons for not further evaluating a specific species are listed in Appendix B. The following is

a summary of the CNDDB and USFWS IPaC Database sensitive animals with potential habitat on the

project site. An evaluation of the potential of the project to effect the species is presented after Table 2.

Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni)

This species is an uncommon breeding resident and migrant in the Central Valley, Klamath Basin,

Northeastern Plateau, Lassen County, and Mojave Desert. Swainson’s hawks breed in stands with few

trees in juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, and in oak savannah in the Central Valley. The Swainson's

hawk is not an obligate riparian species; its relationship with riparian habitats is variable and largely

dependent on the availability and distribution of suitable nesting trees in proximity to high-quality

foraging habitats. In the Central Valley, nest sites are strongly associated with riparian forest vegetation.

They forage in adjacent grasslands or suitable grain or alfalfa fields, or livestock pastures.

While there is no suitable breeding habitat within the APE, adjacent farmland could be utilized by this

species. Operation of the project will not impact this species; however, construction activities could

result in impacts to the Swainson’s hawk. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact

on this species with the implementation of the mitigation measures below. With the implementation of

MM-BIO-1 through MM-BIO-3, the project may, but is not likely to affect this species.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: If avoidance of the avian breeding season (February 15 to September 15) is

not feasible, beginning thirty days prior to the initiation of project activities, a qualified biologist with

experience in conducting breeding bird surveys shall conduct a bird survey to detect protected bird

species occurring in suitable nesting habitat to be disturbed and (as access to adjacent areas allows) any

other such habitat within 500 feet and shall include trees, vegetation, and small mammal burrows along

the alignment. If a bird species is found, the project proponent should delay all project activities within

500 feet of on- and off-site suitable nesting habitat until August 31. Alternatively, the qualified biologist

could continue the surveys weekly in order to locate any nests. If a nest is located, project activities


within 500 feet of the nest or as determined by a qualified biological monitor must be postponed until

the nest is vacated, juveniles have fledged, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting.

Flagging, stakes, and/or construction fencing should be used to demarcate the inside boundary of the

buffer of 500 feet between the project activities and the nest. Project personnel, including all

contractors working on site, should be instructed on the sensitivity of the area. The biological monitor

should provide Manteca Unified School District with the results of the survey and recommended

protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable State and Federal laws

pertaining to the protection of bird species.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: If active avian nests are identified during preconstruction surveys, a

biological monitor shall be present on-site during all grubbing and clearing of vegetation to ensure that

these activities remain within the project footprint (i.e. outside any nesting buffers) and that

flagging/stakes/fencing that are erected to protect nests are maintained, and to minimize the likelihood

that active nests are abandoned or fail due to project activities. The biological monitor shall send weekly

monitoring reports to the Manteca Unified School District during the grubbing and clearing of

vegetation, and shall notify Manteca Unified School District and CDFW immediately if project activities

damage active avian nests.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Should any vertical tubes, such as solar mount poles, chain link fencing

poles, or any other hollow poles be utilized on site, the vertical pole shall be capped immediately after

installation to prevent avian fatalities.

4.3 Migratory and Nesting Birds

A survey for avian nests was completed at the project site. No active avian stick nests were observed

during the survey. No nests were found in trees that would be impacted by project activities. It is

unlikely that birds would choose the project site for nesting, as the school has an active student

population during the school year, and the adjacent agricultural crops are consistently disturbed by

workers and maintained. However, there is a possibility that despite the site conditions, nests could be

established on or adjacent to the project site.

Nearly all native bird species are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If birds were to nest

on site prior to construction, project‐related activities could result in the abandonment of active nests or

direct mortality to birds. Such an activity would constitute a violation of state and federal laws (see

Section 2.0) and would be considered a significant impact.

Despite no nests being observed, the proposed project has the potential to impact nesting birds and

migratory birds if project construction occurs during the nesting season. Typically, the avian nesting

season is identified between February 1 and August 31. To prevent the take of nesting birds protected

under California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503 and 3505.5, as well as bird species protected under

the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, measures should be included as mitigation if project activities will occur

between February 1 and August 31. The project may result in impacts to migratory and nesting birds,

but is not likely to adversely affect these species with the implementation of the following mitigation

measure along with MM-BIO-2 and MM-BIO 3 listed above.


Mitigation Measure BIO-4: If avoidance of the avian breeding season (February 15 to September 15) is

not feasible, beginning thirty days prior to the initiation of project activities, a qualified biologist with

experience in conducting breeding bird surveys conduct a bird survey to detect protected bird species

occurring in suitable nesting habitat to be disturbed and (as access to adjacent areas allows) any other

such habitat within 300 feet of the disturbance area (within 500 feet for raptors), and shall include trees,

vegetation, and small mammal burrows along the alignment. If a bird species are found, the project

proponent should delay all project activities within 300 feet of on- and off-site suitable nesting habitat

(within 500 feet for suitable raptor nesting habitat) until August 31. Alternatively, the qualified biologist

could continue the surveys weekly in order to locate any nests. If a nest is located, project activities

within 300 feet of the nest (within 500 feet for raptor nests) or as determined by a qualified biological

monitor, must be postponed until the nest is vacated, and juveniles have fledged, and there is no

evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Flagging, stakes, and/or construction fencing should be used to

demarcate the inside boundary of the buffer of 300 feet (or 500 feet) between the project activities and

the nest. Project personnel, including all contractors working on site, should be instructed on the

sensitivity of the area. The biological monitor should provide the MUSD with the results of the survey

and recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable State

and Federal laws pertaining to the protection of bird species.

4.4 Special Status Plants

C2 completed a review of the potential sensitive animal species that have been found in the USGS

Manteca Quadrangle, and surrounding 8 quadrangles. Twenty-two animal species had occurrence

records in those areas and four sensitive habitats were identified. All of the 22 species are found

exclusively in habitat not found on the project site. Reasons are listed in Appendix B of this report.

The project site is completely dominated by paved surfaces or other disturbed areas. There is no habitat

for sensitive plant species. The project will not result in impacts to sensitive plant species.

4.5 Oak Woodlands

There are no oak trees on the project site. Oak woodland habitat and heritage oak trees are not found

within the APE. There would be no impacts to these resources, and no mitigation measures would be

necessary.

5.0 CONCLUSION

There is no wetland and riparian habitat, animal or plant species, oak trees, and nesting birds. No

impacts are expected to other sensitive natural communities, native resident or migratory fish or wildlife

species, wildlife corridors, or wildlife nursery sites. No mitigation measures are needed, and the project

will not result in impacts. Overall, the project is not likely to adversely affect biological resources.


6.0 REFERENCES

CNDDB 2016, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). Computer

based search for the Manteaca, Stockton West, Stockton East, Peters, Ripon, Lathrop, Salida, Vernalis,

Avena US) USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle Maps, March 2016.

CNPS, Rare Plant Program. 2016. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02).

California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, Ca. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed

March 1, 2016].

Calflora: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. [web application].

2016. Berkeley, California: The Calflora Database [a non-profit organization]. Available:

http://www.calflora.org/ (Accessed: September 2, 2016)

California Department of Conservation. 2007. Hydrological Region Map.

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/watershedportal/InformationResources/Documents/WS_huc10_r

egions8_26_10.pdf visited November 1, 2016.

Cowardian, L.M. F.C Golet, and E.T. Laroe. Classification of wetlands and deep water habitats of the

United States. Fish and Wildlife Service publication FWS/OBS-79/31, December, 1979, U.S. Department

of Interior, Washington, D.C.

Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Agency. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts

to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities. November 29, 2009.

Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Agency, Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation State

of California, March 7, 2012.

Hickman, J.C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press.

Berkeley, CA. 1400 pp.

Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.

Nongame-Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, CA. 156 pp.

List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations. Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, California

Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, CA. September 2010.

Munz, P.A. 1959. A California Flora. In collaboration with D.D. Keck. University of California Press.

Berkeley, CA. 1681 pp.

Munz, P.A. 1968. Supplement to a California Flora. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA. 224 pp.

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. Accessed November 1, 2016.

https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/osdname.aspx

http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/watershedportal/InformationResources/Documents/WS_huc10_regions8_26_10.pdf

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/watershedportal/InformationResources/Documents/WS_huc10_regions8_26_10.pdf


U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Conservation Guidelines for the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle. 1999.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), 5-Year Review:Summary and Evaluation. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office. September 2007. Woodbridge, B. 1998. Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni). In The Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: a

strategy for reversing the decline of riparian-associated birds in California. California Partners in Flight.

http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/riparian_v-2.html

Zeiner, D.C., W.F.Laudenslayer, Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife. Vol.

I-III. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.

http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/riparian_v-2.html


Appendix A – Site Photos


Photo 1. Well Site

Photo 2. Well Site


Photo 5. Nile Garden School – APE

Photo 6. Nile Garden School – APE


Appendix B – List of CNDDB, CNPS, and USFWS and

CNDDB Occurrence Map

Sensitive Species for Review and Agency Sensitive Species Lists


Sensitive Animal Species (per CNDDB and USFWS) – Nile Garden School Project

Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank

CNPS Rank Other Status Habitat

Potential for Project to Affect Species

Bombus crotchii Crotch bumble bee

None

None G3G4 S1S2 None

Coastal California east to the Sierra-Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Food plant genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum.

No. Does not have FESA,

CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Bombus occidentalis western bumble bee

None

None G2G3 S1

USFS-S XERCES-IM

Once common & widespread, species has declined precipitously from central CA to southern B.C., perhaps from disease.


CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Bombus caliginosus obscure bumble bee

None

None G4? S1S2 IUCN-VU

Coastal areas from Santa Barabara county to north to Washington state. Food plant genera include Baccharis, Cirsium, Lupinus, Lotus, Grindelia and Phacelia.


CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Anthicus sacramento Sacramento anthicid beetle

None

None G1 S1 IUCN-EN Restricted to sand dune areas.


CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Lytta molesta molestan blister beetle

None

None G2 S2 None

Inhabits the Central Valley of California, from Contra Costa to Kern and Tulare counties. Vernal pool and wetland.


CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Desmocerus californicus dimorphus valley elderberry longhorn beetle

Threatened None

G3T2 S2 None

Riparian scrub Prefers to lay eggs in elderberries 2-8 inches in diameter; some preference shown for "stressed" elderberries.

Project will not affect

species. No elderberry

shrubs present on

site.

Linderiella occidentalis California linderiella

None

None G2G3 S2S3 IUCN-NT

Vernal pool. Seasonal pools in unplowed grasslands with old alluvial soils underlain by hardpan or in sandstone depressions. Water in the pools has very low alkalinity, conductivity, and TDS.


CESA, CEQA, or NEPA

evaluation status.

Branchinecta conservation Conservancy fairy shrimp

Endangered

None G2 S2 IUCN-EN

Valley & foothill grassland, vernal pool, wetland. Endemic to the grasslands of the northern two-thirds of the Central Valley; found in large, turbid pools. Inhabit astatic pools located in swales formed by old, braided alluvium; filled by winter/spring rains, last until June.


species. No aquatic habitat

present on site.

Lepidurus packardi Endangered G4 S3S4 IUCN-EN Valley & foothill grassland, vernal pool, Project will



Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank



vernal pool tadpole shrimp

None

wetland. Pools commonly found in grass bottomed swales of unplowed grasslands. Some pools are mud-bottomed & highly turbid.

not affect species. No

aquatic habitat

present on site.

Branchinecta mesovallensis midvalley fairy shrimp

None

None G2 S2S3 None

Vernal pool and wetland. Vernal pools in the Central Valley.



present on site.

Branchinecta lynchi vernal pool fairy shrimp

Threatened

None G3 S3 IUCN-VU

Valley & foothill grassland, Vernal pool, Wetland Endemic to the grasslands of the Central Valley, Central Coast mtns, and South Coast mtns, in astatic rain-filled pools. Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basalt-flow depression pools.



present on site.

Thamnophis gigas giant garter snake

Threatened

Threatened G2S2 IUCN-VU

Prefers freshwater marsh and low gradient streams. Has adapted to drainage canals & irrigation ditches. Marsh & swamp, riparian scrub, wetland.



present on site.

Ambystoma californiense California tiger salamander

Threatened

Threatened G2G3 S2S3 CDFW-SSC

Cismontane woodland, meadow & seep, riparian woodland, valley & foothill grassland, vernal pool, wetland. Need underground refuges, especially ground squirrel burrows, & vernal pools or other seasonal water sources for breeding.



present on site. No upland

breeding habitat on

site.

Rana draytonii California red-legged frog

Threatened

None G2G3 S2S3

CDFW-SSC IUCN-VU

Aquatic, artificial flowing waters, artificial standing waters, freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian forest, riparian scrub, riparian woodland, Sacramento/San Joaquin flowing waters, Sacramento/San Joaquin standing waters, south coast flowing waters, south coast standing waters, wetland. Lowlands & foothills in or near permanent sources of deep water with dense, shrubby or emergent riparian vegetation. Requires



present on site.



Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank



11-20 weeks of permanent water for larval development. Must have access to estivation habitat.

Mylopharodon conocephalus hardhead

None

None G3 S3

CDFW-SSC USFS-S

Klamath/North coast flowing waters, Sacramento/San Joaquin flowing waters. Low to mid-elevation streams in the Sacramento-San Joaquin drainage. Also present in the Russian River.



present on site.

Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus steelhead - Central Valley DPS

Threatened

None G5T2QS2 AFS-TH

Aquatic. Sacramento/San Joaquin flowing waters. Populations in the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries.



present on site.

Spirinchus thaleichthys longfin smelt

Candidate Threatened

G5 S1 CDFW-SSC Aquatic. Estuary. Prefer salinities of 15-30 ppt, but can be found in completely freshwater to almost pure seawater.



present on site.

Hypomesus transpacificus Delta smelt

Threatened

Endangered G1S1

AFS-TH IUCN-EN

Aquatic. Estuary. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Seasonally in Suisun Bay, Carquinez Strait & San Pablo Bay.



present on site.

Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo

Endangered Endangered

G5T2 S2

Riparian forest, riparian scrub, riparian woodland. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite.


species. No riparian habitat

present on site.

Coccyzus americanus occidentalis western yellow-billed cuckoo

Threatened Endangered

G5T2T3 S1

Riparian forest. Nests in riparian jungles of willow, often mixed with cottonwoods, w/ lower story of blackberry, nettles, or wild grape.



present on site.

Melospiza melodia song sparrow ("Modesto" population)

None

None G5 S3? CDFW-SSC

The Modesto song sparrow remains locally numerous in areas where extensive wetlands remain. Affinity for emergent freshwater marshes dominated by tules and cattails as well as riparian willow thickets. Nests in


species. No wetland habitat

present on



Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank



riparian forests of valley oak (Quercus lobata) with a sufficient understory of blackberry (Rubus spp.), along vegetated irrigation canals and levees, and in recently planted valley oak restoration sites

site.

Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus yellow-headed blackbird

None

None G5 S3

CDFW-SSC IUCN-LC

Marsh & swamp, wetland. Nests in freshwater emergent wetlands with dense vegetation & deep water. Often along borders of lakes or ponds.



present on site.

Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird

None

None G2G3 S1S2

BLM-S CDFW-SSC IUCN-EN

NABCI-RWL USFWS-BCC

Freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, swamp, wetland. Highly colonial species, most numerous in Central Valley & vicinity. Largely endemic to California. Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, & foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the colony.



present on site.

Branta hutchinsii leucopareia cackling (=Aleutian Canada) goose

Delisted

None

G5 S3 None

Artificial standing waters, Sacramento/San Joaquin standing waters, valley & foothill grassland. Winters on lakes and inland prairies.Forages on natural pasture or that cultivated to grain; loafs on lakes, reservoirs, ponds.



present on site.

Athene cunicularia burrowing owl

None

None G4 S3

BLM-S CDFW-SSC

IUCN-LC USFWS-BCC

Coastal prairie, Coastal scrub, Great Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Valley & foothill grassland Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts & scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel.


species. No habitat

present on site. No burrows present.

Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike

None None

G4S4 CDFW-SSC

IUCN-LC USFWS-BCC

Broken woodlands, savannah, pinyon-juniper, Joshua tree, & riparian woodlands, desert oases, scrub & washes. Prefers open country for hunting, with perches for scanning, and fairly dense shrubs and brush for nesting.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk

None

Threatened G5S3

BLM-S IUCN-LC

USFWS-BCC

Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, savannahs, & agricultural or ranch lands with groves or lines of trees. Requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, or alfalfa or

Further evaluation required.



Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank



grain fields supporting rodent populations. Great Basin grassland, riparian forest, riparian woodland, valley & foothill grassland.

Elanus leucurus white-tailed kite

None

None G5 S3S4

BLM-S CDFW-FP IUCN-LC

Cismontane woodland, marsh & swamp, riparian woodland, valley & foothill grassland, wetland. Open grasslands, meadows, or marshes for foraging close to isolated, dense-topped trees for nesting and perching.


species. No breeding or

foraging habitat

present on site.

Falco columbarius merlin

None

None G5 S3S4

CDFW-WL IUCN-LC

Estuary, Great Basin grassland, valley & foothill grassland. Clumps of trees or windbreaks are required for roosting in open country.


species. No breeding or

foraging habitat

present on site.

Antrozous pallidus pallid bat

None

None G5 S3

BLM-S CDFW-SSC

IUCN-LC USFS-S

WBWG-H

Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Desert wash, Great Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Riparian woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Upper montane coniferous forest, Valley & foothill grassland Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands & forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites.


species. No roosting habitat

present on site.

Neotoma fuscipes riparia riparian (=San Joaquin Valley) woodrat

Endangered

None G5T1Q S1 CDFW-SSC

Riparian forest, riparian scrub. Riparian areas along the San Joaquin, Stanislaus & Tuolumne rivers. Need areas with mix of brush & trees. Need suitable nesting sites in trees, snags or logs.



present on site.

Sylvilagus bachmani riparius riparian brush rabbit

Endangered

Endangered G5T1 S1

Riparian forest. Dense thickets of wild rose, willows, and blackberries.



present on site.

CDFW: California Department of Fish and Wildlife IUCN: International Union for Conservation of Nature BLM: Bureau of Land Management NABCI: North American Bird Conservation Initiative USFWS: US Department of Fish and Wildlife

WL: Watch List LC: Least Concern S: Sensitive SSC: Species of Special Concern EN: Endangered



Scientific Name

Common Name

Federal

Status

State Status

Global Rank



USFS: US Forest Service WBWG: Western Bat Working Group

RWL: Red Watch List BCC: Birds of Conservation Concern FP: Fully Protected NT: Near Threatened H: High Priority VU: Vulnerable YWL: Yellow Watch List

Sensitive Plant Species (per CNDDB, USFWS, and CNPS) - Nile Garden School Project

Scientific Name Common Name

Federal Status

State Status

Global/State Rank



Amsinckia grandiflora large-flowered fiddleneck

Endangered

Endangered

G1 S1 1B.1

Endemic to California. The last remaining native populations are on the grasslands near Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Alameda County. Grows on sedimentary loam in mesic areas of its range.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Astragalus tener var. tener alkali milk-vetch

None

None

G2T2 S2 1B.2

None Alkaline, playas, valley and foothill grassland (adobe clay), vernal pools. 1-60m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Atriplex cordulata var. cordulata heartscale

None

None

G3 S2 1B.2

BLM-S

Saline or alkaline, chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland (sandy), 0-560m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Atriplex coronata var. coronata crownscale

None

None

G4T3 S3 4.2

Alkaline, often clay, chenopod scrub, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools, 1-590 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Atriplex minuscula lesser saltscale

None

None

G2 S2 1.B1

None Alkaline, sandy, chenopod scrub, playas, valley and foothill grassland, 50-200m.


species. No habitat

present on




Federal Status

State Status

Global/State Rank



site.

Blepharizonia plumosa big tarplant

None

None

G2 S2 1B.1

SB-RSABG Usually clay, valley and foothill grassland, 30-505 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Brasenia schreberi watershield

None

None

G5 S3 2B.3

None Marshes and swamps- freshwater, 30-2200 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

California macrophylla round-leaved filaree

None

None

G3? S3? 1B.2

BLM-S SB-RSABG SB-SBBG

Cismontane, woodland, valley & foothill grassland. Clay soils. 15-1200 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Centromadia parryi ssp. rudis Parry's rough tarplant

None

None

G3T3 S3 4.2

Alkaline, vernally mesic, seeps, sometimes roadsides, Valley and foothill grassland, Vernal pools, 0-100 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Chloropyron palmatum palmate-bracted salty bird's-beak

Endangered

Endangered

G1 S1 1B.1

SB-RSABG

Chenopod scrub, meadow & seep, valley & foothill grassland, wetland. Usually on Pescadero silty clay which is alkaline, with Distichlis, Frankenia, etc. 5-155 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Cirsium crassicaule slough thistle

None

None

G2 S2 1B.1

BLM-S

Chenopod scrub, freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian scrub, wetland sloughs, riverbanks, and marshy areas. 3-100 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Delphinium recurvatum recurved larkspur

None

None

G2? S2? 1B.2

BLM-S

Chenopod scrub, cismontane woodland, valley & foothill grassland. On alkaline soils; often in valley saltbush or valley chenopod scrub. 3-790 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Eryngium racemosum Delta button-celery

None Endangered

G1Q S1 1B.1

None Riparian scrub, wetland. Seasonally inundated floodplain on clay. 3-75m.


species. No habitat




Federal Status

State Status

Global/State Rank



present on site.

Extriplex joaquinana San Joaquin spearscale

None

None

G2 S2 1B.2

BLM-S SB-RSABG

Alkali playa, chenopod scrub , meadow & seep, valley & foothill grassland In seasonal alkali wetlands or alkali sink scrub with Distichlis spicata, Frankenia, etc. 1-835 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Hibiscus lasiocarpos var. occidentalis woolly rose-mallow

None

None

G5T2 S2 1B.2

SB-RSABG

Freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, wetland. Moist, freshwater-soaked river banks & low peat islands in sloughs; can also occur on riprap and levees. In California, known from the delta watershed. 0-120 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii Delta tule pea

None

None

G5T2 S2 1B.2

SB-BerrySB SB-RSABG

Marshes and swamps (freshwater and brackish). 0-5 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Puccinellia simplex California alkali grass

None

None

G3 S2 1B.2

None

Alkaline, vernally mesic; sinks, flats, and lake margins. Chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. 2-930 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Sagittaria sanfordii Sanford's arrowhead

None

None

G3 S3 1B.2

BLM-S Marshes and swamps (assorted shallow freshwater). 0-650 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Symphyotrichum lentum Suisun Marsh aster

None

None

G2 S2 1B.2

SB-RSABG SB-USDA

Brackish marsh, freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, wetland. Most often seen along sloughs with Phragmites, Scirpus, blackberry, Typha, etc. 0-3 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Trichocoronis wrightii var. wrightii Wright's trichocoronis

None

None

G4T3 S1 2B.1

None

Marsh & swamp, meadow & seep, riparian forest, vernal pool, wetland. Mud flats of vernal lakes, drying river beds, alkali meadows. 5-435 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Trifolium None G2 S2 None Marsh & swamp, valley & Project will




Federal Status

State Status

Global/State Rank



hydrophilum saline clover

None

1B.2 foothill grassland, vernal pool, wetland. Mesic, alkaline sites. 0-300 m.

not affect species. No

habitat present on

site.

Tuctoria greenei Greene's tuctoria

Endangered Rare

G1 S1

Vernal pool, wetland. Dry bottoms of vernal pools in open grasslands. 30-1070 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Great Valley Cottonwood Riparian Forest

None

None G2 S2.1 BLM-S Riparian forest.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Elderberry Savanna None

None

G2 S2.1

Riparian scrub.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest

None

None G2 S2.2

Riparian forest.


species. No habitat

present on site.

Great Valley Oak Riparian Forest

None

None G5T2 S2

Freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, wetland. Moist, freshwater-soaked river banks & low peat islands in sloughs; can also occur on riprap and levees. In California, known from the delta watershed. 0-120 m.


species. No habitat

present on site.

BLM: Bureau of Land Management USFS: U.S. Forest Service USDA: U.S. Department of Agriculture RSABG: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

S: Sensitive

A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NILE GARDEN SCHOOL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT,

5700 E. NILE ROAD, MANTECA, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Prepared for:

Quincy Yaley C2 Consult. Corp.

7451 N. Remington Avenue, Suite 100 Fresno, CA 93711

(559) 228-9223

Prepared by:

C. Kristina Roper, M.A., RPA Sierra Valley Cultural Planning

41845 Sierra Avenue Three Rivers, California 93271

(559) 288-6375

19 January 2017

Topographic Quadrangle: Manteca, 7.5’ (1994)

Area: 15.3 acres (6 hectares) / 13,400 linear ft (4,084 meters)

(Keywords: Manteca, Township 2S, Range 7E, Northern Valley Yokuts)

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS..........................................................................................................2

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................8

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................9

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT……………………………………………………………. 9 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT……………………………………………………….. 10

SOURCES CONSULTED .........................................................................................................11

BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................11

PREHISTORIC PERIOD SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………. 11 ETHNOGRAPHIC SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………... 15 HISTORIC PERIOD SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………… 16

METHODS AND FINDINGS .....................................................................................................18

REFERENCES CITED ..............................................................................................................19

PREPARER'S QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................................21

Attachment A: Records Search (CCIC File # 10115L) Attachment B: Native American Consultation

2

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The proposed project is a water system upgrade project that includes the construction of new waterlines, installation of a tank and pumps, and the connection to an existing water utility system. The project includes a new well, new water lines, and treatment equipment at an existing school site. The project will consolidate the Nile Garden School water system with the City of Manteca water system. The project study area is located in Township 2S, Range 7E, Section 7 and 18, MDB&M (see Maps 1-2). C2 Consult Corp. (C2) is preparing environmental documents necessary under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Provisions and implementing guidelines of the CEQA, as amended March 18, 2010, state that identification and evaluation of historical resources is required for any action that may result in a potential adverse effect on the significance of such resources, which include archaeological resources. The project is also subject to provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Advisory Council of Historic Preservation regulations (36 CFR 800) for implementing Section 106 of the NHPA require that federal agencies take into consideration the potential effects of proposed projects on historic properties (i.e., cultural resources listed on, or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places).

On November 10, 2016, Sierra Valley Cultural Planning (SVCP) archaeologist Douglas S. McIntosh completed a reconnaissance level archaeological survey of the project Area of Potential Effect (APE). The APE includes the Nile Garden School site, a proposed well site, and 13,400 feet (4,084 meters) of new distribution pipelines (see Maps 3-5). No archaeological or other cultural resources were identified as a result of this cultural resources assessment. No Native American areas of concern were identified as a result of consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission and local Native American groups. Analysis of soil characteristics for the proposed sites suggest there is a moderately low probability of buried archaeological deposits within the APE. Therefore, it is unlikely that the proposed action will have an effect on important archaeological, historical, or other cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation is therefore recommended. In the unlikely event that buried archaeological deposits are encountered within the project area, the finds must be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Should human remains be encountered, the County Coroner must be contacted immediately; if the remains are determined to be Native American, then the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted as well.

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the findings of a pedestrian archaeological survey of a 15.3-acre (6-hectare) parcel of land and approximately 13,400 linear feet (4,084 meters) between Woodward Avenue and Nile Road, southwest of the City of Manteca in southern San Joaquin County, California (Map 1). The survey was completed by SVCP on 10 November 2016.

C2 Consult Corp. (C2) is preparing environmental documents necessary under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Provisions and implementing guidelines of the CEQA, as amended March 18, 2010, state that identification and evaluation of historical resources is required for any action that may result in a potential adverse effect on the significance of such resources, which include archaeological resources. The project is also subject to provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Advisory Council of Historic Preservation regulations (36 CFR 800) for implementing Section 106 of the NHPA require that federal agencies take into consideration the potential effects of proposed projects on historic properties (i.e.,

3

N

MAP 1. LOCATION MAP

A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NILE GARDEN SCHOOL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT, MANTECA, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

Project Study Area

Map 2. Project Study Area, Nile Garden School Water Supply Project.

USGS Manteca, CA 7.5’ (1994) Township 2 S, Range 7 E, Sections 7, 18

Pipeline

Well Site

School

Map 3. Proposed Waterlines.

Map 4. Existing School Site Plan.

MAP 5. Proposed School Piping Plan

8

cultural resources listed on, or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places).

SVCP archaeologist Douglas S. McIntosh completed a systematic pedestrian archaeological survey of the project Area of Potential Effect (APE). This report was completed by SVCP Principal Investigator C. Kristina Roper.

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The proposed water supply project is located along the edges of Union Road, Oleander Avenue, Peach Road and Nile Road within a portion of the City of Manteca and within unincorporated portions of San Joaquin County, California (Township 2S, Range 7E, Sections 7 and 18, MDB&M; see Maps 1 and 2). The project objective is to allow Nile Garden School to comply with the drinking water regulations and to obtain a new water source to solve the arsenic non-compliance issue at the school site. The project will provide reliable water supply and water quality meeting the arsenic drinking water standards to the Nile Garden School.

The proposed project is a water system upgrade project that includes the construction of new waterlines, installation of a tank and pumps, and the connection to an existing water utility system. The project includes a new well, new water lines, and treatment equipment at an existing school site. Further, the project will connect the Nile Garden School water system to the City of Manteca water system.

A new well will be drilled in the City of Manteca city limits in Palmer Park on Sephos Street. The new well will be 16 inches in diameter, 540 feet deep, and have a capacity of up to 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm). Approximately 7,200 feet of 12-inch waterline and 6,600 feet of 4-inch waterline will be installed in existing road rights-of-ways within the following roadways:

• Oleander Avenue – 12 inch water line • Peach Road – 12 inch water line • Union Road – 12 inch north of Peach Road, 4 inch water line south of Peach Road • Nile Road – 4 inch water line

The trench for the pipeline will be approximately 4 feet deep and 3 feet wide; maximum trench depth will be 5 feet. The water line will extend to the Nile Garden School, and the existing on-site system will be connected to the City of Manteca water system. At the school site, the domestic water system will be separated from the irrigation system. The school is currently served by two wells and one 3,000-gallon hydropneumatic tank. A new 10,000 gallon water tank, along with booster pumps, will be constructed. The existing wells on the project site will serve the school’s irrigation water demand, and the domestic water supply will be served by the City of Manteca water system.

The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project includes the project footprint described above (see Maps 3-5).

9

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

National Historic Preservation Act The NHPA of 1966, as amended (16 United States Code 470 et seq.), is the primary federal legislation that outlines the federal government’s responsibility to consider the effects of its actions on historic properties and affords the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment. Section 106 of the NHPA and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800 describes the process that the federal agency shall take to identify cultural resources and assess the level of effect that the proposed undertaking will have on historic properties. An undertaking is defined as a “…project, activity or program funded in whole or in part, under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency.” This includes projects that are carried out by, or on behalf of, the agency; those carried out with federal assistance; those requiring a federal permit, license, or approval; and those subject to state or local regulation administered pursuant to a delegation, or approval by, a federal agency (Section 301[7] 16 U.S.C. 470w[7]).

A cultural resource is a broad term that includes prehistoric, historic, architectural, and traditional cultural properties. Those cultural resources that are listed on, or are eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are referred to as historic properties. The criteria for NRHP eligibility are outlined at 36 CFR Part 60. Other applicable federal cultural resources laws and regulations that could apply include, but are not limited to, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), and the Archaeological Resource Protection Act (ARPA). Compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR Part 800) follows a series of steps that are designed to identify and consult with interested parties, determine the area of potential effects (APE), determine if historic properties are present within the APE, and assess the effects the undertaking will have on historic properties. Section 106 requires consultation with Indian Tribes concerning the identification of sites of religious or cultural significance and with individuals or groups who are entitled, or requested, to be consulting parties. The regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.5 require federal agencies to apply the criteria of adverse effect to the historic properties identified within the APE. The criteria of adverse effect, defined at 36 CFR Part 800.5(a)(1), states that:

“An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly to indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association.”

The 36 CFR Part 800 regulations include consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) to provide an opportunity to comment on, and concur with, Reclamations’ determinations. If the undertaking would result in adverse effects to historic properties, these adverse effects must be resolved in consultation with the SHPO and other parties identified during the Section 106 process before the undertaking can proceed to implementation. National Register Criteria for Evaluation The criteria for evaluation of NRHP eligibility are outlined at 36 CFR Part 60.4. A district, site, building, structure, or object must generally be at least 50 years old to be eligible for consideration as a historic property. That district, site, building, structure, or object must retain integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association as well as meet one of the following criteria to demonstrate its significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. A district, site, building, structure, or object must:

10

(A) be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad

patterns of history; or (B) be associated with the lives of people significance in our past; or (C) embody the distinct characteristics or a type, period, or method of construction, or

represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic values, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or

(D) have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

A site must have integrity and meet one of the four criteria of eligibility to demonstrate its historic associations in order to convey its significance. A property must be associated with one or more events important in history or prehistory in order to be considered for listing under Criterion A. Additionally, the specific association of the property, itself, must also be considered significant. Criterion B applies to properties associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified and documented. Properties significant for physical design or construction under Criterion C must have features with characteristics that exemplify such elements as architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, and artwork. Criterion D most commonly applies to properties that have the potential to answer, in whole or in part, important research questions about human history that can only be answered by the actual physical materials of the cultural resources. A property eligible under Criterion D must demonstrate the potential to contain information relevant to prehistory and history (National Register Bulletin 15). A district, site, building, structure, or object may also be eligible for consideration as a historic property if that property meets the criteria considerations for properties generally less than 50 years old, in addition to possessing integrity and meeting the criteria for evaluation.

California Environmental Quality Act CEQA requires consideration of project impacts on archaeological or historical sites deemed to be "historical resources." Under CEQA, a substantial adverse change in the significant qualities of a historical resource is considered a significant effect on the environment. For the purposes of CEQA, a "historical resource" is a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (CR) (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(1)-(3)). Historical resources may include, but are not limited to, "any object, building, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California" (PRC §5020.1(j)). The eligibility criteria for the CR are the definitive criteria for assessing the significance of historical resources for the purposes of CEQA (Office of Historic Preservation n.d.). Generally, a resource is considered "historically significant" if it meets one or more of the following criteria for listing on the CR:

1) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; or

2) is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or 3) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of

construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

4) has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (PRC §5024.1[c]).

11

SOURCES CONSULTED

A records search (CCIC File # 10115L) was completed on 8 December by Central

California Information Center (CCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System staff to identify areas previously investigated and to identify known cultural resources present within or in close proximity to the Project APE. According to the Information Center records, there are no prehistoric sites identified within the project APE. Nile Garden School, constructed in 1963, is located within the project area. There have been have been two previous investigations within the APE (CCIC Report # SJ-5309 and -6625); three investigations have been completed within 1/4 mile of the APE (SJ-6322, -6358, and -6894). No cultural resource sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, California Points of Historical Interest, State Historic Landmarks, or the California Inventory of Historic Resources have been documented within ½-mile radius of the Project APE (see Attachment A).

The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted on 7 December 2016

in order to determine whether Native American sacred sites have been identified either within or in close proximity to the project area. A response received 10 December 2016 indicated that while a record search of the sacred land file failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area, the absence of specific site information in the sacred lands file does not indicate the absence of cultural sources in any project area. The NAHC provided a list of six Native American tribes and individuals/organization that may have knowledge of cultural resources in or near the project area. Letters were written to these contacts on 11 December 2016. No responses were received as of 19 January 2017. Consultation correspondence is included in Attachment B.

BACKGROUND The project area is located in the southern city limits of Manteca in southern San Joaquin County, California. The project is located in an area with a mixture of new housing tract developments, isolated residential homes on small acreage, almond orchards and open fields. The parcel gradually slopes east to west; elevation ranges from 25 to 30 feet above sea level. Figures 1 through 4 provide a pictorial overview of the project APE. Prior to EuroAmerican exploration and settlement in the region, the central San Joaquin Valley was extensive grassland covered with spring-flowering herbs. Stands of trees -- sycamore, cottonwoods, box elders and willows -- lined the stream and river courses with groves of valley oaks in well-watered localities with rich soil. Rivers yielded fish, mussels, and pond turtles; migratory waterfowl nested in the dense tules along the river sloughs downstream. When the Spanish first set foot in the area, they found the deer and tule elk trails to be so broad and extensive that they first supposed that the area was occupied by cattle. Grizzly bears occupied the open grassland and riparian corridors on the valley floor and adjacent foothills. Smaller mammals and birds, including jackrabbits, ground squirrels, and quail were abundant. Native Americans occupants of the region describe abundant sedge beds, along with rich areas of deer grass, plants that figure prominently in the construction of Native American basketry items. Prehistoric Period Summary

The San Joaquin Valley and adjacent Sierran foothills and Coast Range have a long and complex cultural history with distinct regional patterns that extend back more than 11,000 years (McGuire 1995). The first generally agreed-upon evidence for the presence of prehistoric peoples in the region is represented by the distinctive basally-thinned and fluted projectile points, found

12

Figure 1. Looking south along proposed pipeline route at Oleander Avenue at Sephos Street

(station 18+00).

Figure 2. Looking west along Peach Road at (station 36+00).

13

Figure 3. Looking north along route, Union Road at Fig Road (station 113+00).

Figure 4. Looking south from Niles Road along proposed pipeline route at west side of Niles

Garden School (station 46+99).

14

on the margins of extinct lakes in the San Joaquin Valley. These projectiles, often compared to Clovis points, have been found at three localities in the San Joaquin Valley including along the Pleistocene shorelines of former Tulare Lake. Based on evidence from these sites and other well-dated contexts elsewhere, these Paleo-Indian hunters who used these spear points existed during a narrow time range of 11550 cal B.C. to 8550 cal B.C. (Rosenthal et al. 2007).

As a result of climate change at the end of the Pleistocene, a period of extensive

deposition occurred throughout the lowlands of central California, burying many older landforms and providing a distinct break between Pleistocene and subsequent occupations during the Holocene. Another period of deposition, also a product of climate change, had similar results around 7550 cal B.C., burying some of the oldest archaeological deposits discovered in California (Rosenthal and Meyer 2004a).

The Lower Archaic (8550-5550 cal B.C.) is characterized by an apparent contrast in

economies, although it is possible they may be seasonal expressions of the same economy. Archaeological deposits which date to this period on the valley floor frequently include only large stemmed spear points, suggesting an emphasis on large game such as artiodactyls (Wallace 1991). Recent discoveries in the adjacent Sierra Nevada have yielded distinct milling assemblages which clearly indicate a reliance on plant foods. Investigations at Copperopolis (LaJeunesse and Pryor 1996) argue that nut crops were the primary target of seasonal plant exploitation. Assemblages at these foothill sites include dense accumulations of handstones, millingslabs, and various cobble-core tools, representing “frequently visited camps in a seasonally structured settlement system” (Rosenthal et al. 2007:152). During the Lower Archaic, regional interaction spheres were well established. Marine shell from the central California coast has been found in early Holocene contexts in the Great Basin east of the Sierra Nevada, and eastern Sierra obsidian comprises a large percentage of flaked stone debitage and tools recovered from sites on both sides of the Sierra (Rosenthal et al. 2007:152).

About 8,000 years ago, many California cultures shifted the main focus of their

subsistence strategies from hunting to nut and seed gathering, as evidenced by the increase in food-grinding implements found in archeological sites dating to this period. This cultural pattern is best known for southern California, where it has been termed the Milling Stone Horizon (Wallace 1954, 1978a), but recent studies suggest that the horizon may be more widespread than originally described and is found throughout the central region during the Middle Archaic Period. Dates associated with this period vary between 9,000 and 2,000 cal BP, although most cluster in the 6,800 to 4,500 cal BP range (Basgall and True 1985). On the valley floor, early Middle Archaic sites are relatively rare; this changes significantly toward the end of the Middle Archaic. In central California late Middle Archaic settlement focused on river courses on the valley floor. “Extended residential settlement at these sites is indicated by refined and specialized tool assemblages and features, a wide range of nonutilitarian artifacts, abundant trade objects, and plant and animal remains indicative of year-round occupation” (Rosenthal et al. 2007:154). Again, climate change apparently influence this shift, with warmer, drier conditions prevailing throughout California. The shorelines of many lakes, including Tulare Lake, contracted substantially, while at the same time rising sea levels favored the expansion of the San Joaquin/Sacramento Delta region, with newly formed wetlands extending eastward from the San Francisco Bay. In contrast with rare early Middle Archaic sites on the valley floor, early Middle Archaic sites are relatively common in the Sierran foothills, and their recovered, mainly utilitarian assemblages show relatively little change from the preceding period with a continued emphasis on acorns and pine nuts. Few bone or shell artifacts, beads, or ornaments have been recovered from these localities. Projectile points from this period reflect a high degree of regional

15

morphological variability, with an emphasis on local toolstone material supplemented with a small amount of obsidian from eastern sources. In contrast with the more elaborate mortuary assemblages and extended burial mode documented at Valley sites, burials sites documented at some foothill sites such as CA-FRE-61 on Wahtoke Creek are reminiscent of “re-burial” features reported from Milling Stone Horizon sites in southern California. These re-burials are characterized by re-interment of incomplete skeletons often capped with inverted millingstones (McGuire 1995:57). A return to colder and wetter conditions marked the Upper Archaic in Central California (550 cal B.C. to cal A.D. 1100). Previously desiccated lakes returned to spill levels and increased freshwater flowed in the San Joaquin and Sacramento watershed. Cultural patterns as reflected in the archeological record, particularly specialized subsistence practices, emerged during this period. The archeological record becomes more complex, as specialized adaptations to locally available resources were developed and valley populations expanded into the lower Sierran foothills. New and specialized technologies expanded and distinct shell bead types occurred across the region. The range of subsistence resources utilized and exchange systems expanded significantly from the previous period. In the Central Valley, archaeological evidence of social stratification and craft specialization is indicated by well-made artifacts such as charmstones and beads, often found as mortuary items. The period between approximately cal A.D. 1000 and Euro-American contact is referred to as the Emergent Period. The Emergent Period is marked by the introduction of bow and arrow technology which replaced the dart and atlatl at about cal A.D. 1000 and 1300. In the San Joaquin region, villages and small residential sites developed along the many stream courses in the lower foothills and along the river channels and sloughs of the valley floor. A local form of pottery was developed in the southern Sierran foothills along the Kaweah River. Archaeological excavations at habitation sites in Merced and Fresno counties have revealed an artifact assemblage belong to the Yokuts groups who inhabited the valley floor and adjacent foothills into historic times (Olsen and Payen 1968, 1969; Pritchard 1970). Ethnographic Summary

Prior to EuroAmerican settlement, most of the San Joaquin Valley and the bordering foothills of the Sierra Nevada and Diablo Range were inhabited by speakers of Yokutsan languages. The primary inhabitants of the study area were the Northern Valley Yokuts (Wallace 1978b:462). Northern Valley Yokuts territory extended south from Bear Creek near Stockton to the south side of the San Joaquin River past Mendota, east to the Sierra Foothills, and west to the Coast Range (Wallace 1978b). The Southern Valley Yokuts occupied lands extending south from the Kings River to the Tehachapi Mountains and west to the Temblor Range (Wallace 1978c). The Foothill Yokuts lived along drainages of the lower foothill elevations immediately east of the northern and southern groups (Spier 1978).

The study area may have been used by two bands of Yokuts. The Chulamni occupied an

area at the northern extent of the Yokuts homeland. The Chulamni shared common borders with the Miwok to the east and north as well as the coastal-dwelling Coastanoans to the west. The study area also may have been used by the Lakisamnei, who inhabited the lands south of the Chulamni near the confluence of the San Joaquin and Stanislaus rivers. The dry plains along the western edge of the Northern Valley Yokuts territory, encompassing the study area, contain no permanent water sources, suggesting limited seasonal use of resources from this location (Wallace 1978b:462). In a summary by Pettigrew et al. (1994:3-34-3-35), it is noted that the Northern Valley Yokuts occupied year-round villages along the San Joaquin River and other major tributaries to exploit riverine resources. Settlements in the Coast Range foothills to the west appear to have been used for seasonal procurement to take advantage of oak woodland environments not common to the valley floor.

16

The reader is referred to Gayton (1948), Kroeber (1925), and Wallace (1978b) for

additional information on pre-contact Yokuts subsistence and culture. Historic Period Summary

The following historic overview is taken from Baloian et al. (2004:8-11). The San Joaquin Valley was visited in the late 1700s and early 1800s by Spanish

expeditions exploring the interior in search of potential mission sites, and later making excursions into the San Joaquin basin to capture native peoples who had escaped from the missions. The impact of the Spanish mission system was hardest felt along the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. Some of the most well-known expeditions were those of Gabriel Moraga between 1806 and 1810 (Cook 1960).

During the 1840s the Mexican government granted large tracts of lands, termed "ranches,"

to individuals with the intent to settle and improve these parcels. In the valley, however, it is uncertain to what extent the grantee actually resided on and developed the land.

It was not until after 1849 and the early stages of the Gold Rush that Euro-Americans

seriously considered establishing permanent residence in the valley. Mining claims were staked along the major gold-bearing rivers and in the foothill areas. The mining boom spurred the establishment of other businesses as well. Ferrying operations sprang up along the valley's major water ways, including the Stanislaus River where three separate ferries were founded near present day Ripon (Hillman and Covello 1985:85). Ferrying stations offered more than just transportation across the rivers, as stores, saloons, and hotels were often built to service the flow of miners and travelers that gathered at these crossing points. New roads and transportation routes emerged throughout the valley, and the ranching industry boomed when access to livestock markets to the north and south was established.

While the Gold Rush was a watershed event in the history of the California and thus critical

to the eventual emergence of Manteca, the town's primary resident was not a failed prospector who reinvented himself as successful agriculturalist, as is the case with many early valley settlements. Rather, Manteca's forefather, Joshua Cowell, was a stockman by trade and a mere 21 years old when he and his two brothers came to the area from Wisconsin by way of Carson City in 1863. An excerpt from the 1905 History of the New California, Its Resources and People recounts Cowell's various undertakings:

Irrigation ditches have been built throughout his entire farm, and the waters being turned upon the fields render the soil very rich and enables him to harvest abundant crops. For a number of years, Mr. Cowell has been engaged as a contractor in building of irrigation ditches and levees mainly in San Joaquin county. He devotes his farm to general agricultural pursuits and stock-raising, and both branches of his business have proved profitable. He is also extensively engaged in the dairy industry, and for five years served as president of the Cowell Station Creamery, being the first incumbent in that position [Irvine 1905]. Beginning in 1870, the Central Pacific Railroad increased access for farmers and

dairymen, and the Cowell Station became a regular stop for the railroad. Local grain and dairy products were shipped from the station to the San Francisco Bay area (Shideler 1988:3). Cowell's house, located at what became the intersection of Yosemite Avenue and Main Street, and his operations were situated near the railroad. In 1897 Cowell Station was renamed Manteca to avoid confusion with a similarly named stop along the same rail line.

17

Despite its profitable dairy industry and location along a major transportation route, the Manteca area was sparsely settled. An 1879 map shows that no recognized town existed between Ripon and Lathrop (Gilbert 1968 [1879]). The June 1898 Official Railroad Gazette states that fewer than 100 residents populated the general area (Shideler 1988:3), and as late as 1902 the settlement consisted of only two houses and J. J. Overshiner's establishment, which housed a general store and barber shop (Hillman and Covello 1985:55). Within the early decades of the twentieth century, however, the area saw a succession of economic and infrastructural developments that proved pivotal to the emergence of Manteca as an urban center.

As seen elsewhere in the San Joaquin Valley, growth in the Manteca area largely resulted

from the introduction of an extensive water conveyance system. Along with P. E. Lundstrom and F. A. West, Cowell—who well understood the impact that irrigation could have on an otherwise marginal tract of land—petitioned the county for the formation of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District in 1909 (SSJID 2003). The waters of the Stanislaus River were tapped about 18 miles northeast of Oakdale, and by the 1914 the SSJID could irrigate every 40-acre parcel in the area. The canals were subsequently concrete-lined or piped because the sandy soils leached water from the earthen ditches. With irrigation, melon crops flourished in these same sandy soils, and in 1916 Manteca boasted itself as the "Watermelon Capital of the World" (Shideler 1988:5). The area's agricultural economy became more diversified as orchards and nut crops were cultivated, and many of the large grain farms were subdivided into smaller lots for sale to individual fanners (Hilman and Covello 1985:57).

The completion of the SSJID system ushered in a new period of unprecedented population

growth (SSJID 2003). As a result, Manteca experienced growing pains of a particularly unsavory kind in 1917 when the town's septic tank overflowed. The State Department of Health threatened to condemn the town if measures were not taken to avert future disasters, and in 1918 Manteca was essentially forced to incorporate in order to issue bonds for the construction of a sewage system (Hillman and Covello 1985:55; Shideler 1988:12-13). Joshua Cowell was appropriately elected the city's first mayor. After the city's incorporation, a new jail was built, streets were paved and curbed, and a hospital was constructed at the corner of Yosemite Avenue and Veach Street. During this time, many commercial structures, including some extant two story brick buildings, were also constructed along Yosemite Avenue.

With a reliable water conveyance system and an infrastructure to support a population of

over 1,000 in 1920, the city's location near the confluence of several rail routes and proximity to the bay area made it a prime site for plants related to the canning and food processing industries. Crops and dairy products could be raised, locally processed, and shipped via railroad with minimal transportation expense. (Interestingly, Lathrop served as the railroad hub for the valley and bay area rail lines, but its local economy, which depended largely on rail passenger and freight traffic, never expanded its agricultural base [Hillman and Covello 1985:139-141].) Cowell's dairying business had applied and profited from this very concept for many years, but by the 1910s outside interests soon discovered the logistical advantages of locating their operations in the Manteca area. In 1918 the Spreckels Sugar Company finished construction of its second refinery located in southeast Manteca. Local sugar beet growers had previously incurred the costs of shipping their product to the company's Salinas refinery. As part of the incentive to convince the sugar manufacturer to build its new refinery in Manteca, the growers persuaded the Tidewater Southern Railroad to lay a branch line to the plant site (Shideler 1988:9). Several local canneries also were established at the time, including the Manteca Cannery, the Nile Garden Cannery, the California Tomato Paste Company, and the Manteca Packing Company located in the northwest part of town on the Tidewater Southern Railway. The Manteca Cannery operated for 50 years and built a number of homes for its employees. The company also acquired the Manteca Winery shortly before the advent of prohibition; in 1967 the cannery complex was demolished, except for the

18

original winery which today stands as the oldest commercial building in the city (Hillman and Covello 1985:54).

The first signs of economic trouble arose in 1922 when the local sugar beet crop was

devastated by curly leaf disease. Due to a drop in the price of sugar and the prohibitive cost of obtaining raw sugar from the Philippines, the Spreckels plant shut its doors. The closing of the sugar plant, as well as the closings of three canneries, inflated unemployment in the area. Combined with the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression led to slow population growth, farm foreclosures, and little new commercial and industrial development in the Manteca area. While the Spreckels plant reopened in the mid-1930s, it was not enough change the economic momentum of the city (Shideler 1988).

World War II was a boon for the American economy. Full employment was spurred by the opening of the Kaiser Permanente complex, located near the northwest corner of Louise Avenue and Airport Way, which produced magnesium used in the construction of airplane parts (Napton 1992). After the war, returning soldiers settled in the area, as it was ripe with employment opportunities. Not only did commercial and industrial sectors expand, but local agriculture, which produced the raw goods for local food processing plants, also boomed.

In 1935 the Kraft-Phoenix Cheese Corporation opened its plant at the corner of Manteca Road and Oak Street (Hillman and Covello 1985:63). The company no doubt relied on the local dairy industry to supply milk and cream for the processing of cheese products. The Tri-Dam Project, a co-venture of the SSJID and the Oakdale Irrigation District, was completed in 1957, and the same waters that irrigated agricultural fields could then be used to generate electricity as well (SSJID 2003).

From its meager beginnings and in a relatively short period, Manteca emerged as a town,

grew into a city, and ultimately eclipsed neighboring towns Lathrop and Ripon in terms of size, commercial activity, and importance. Today, with a population of nearly 50,000, Manteca ranks behind only Stockton and Lodi as the largest city in San Joaquin County.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

On November 10, 2016, SVCP archaeologist Douglas S. McIntosh completed a systematic archaeological pedestrian survey of the project APE. The field survey sought to identify any archaeological sites, features or artifacts which might be present of the ground surface. Items such as chipped stone tools, grinding implements, and midden soils are indicators of prehistoric activities. In addition the survey sought to identify any historic features or artifacts over fifty years old.

Survey methods involved walking along the existing road right-of-ways. An area of

approximately five to eight meters was inspected along road edges. In addition, a survey was conducted within the proposed project area at the Nile Garden School campus. A Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 digital camera was used to photo document the project setting and any cultural resources. All photo information was recorded in the field on a photo-log.

The project is located in an area with a mixture of new housing tract developments, isolated residential homes on small acreage, almond orchards and open fields. Ground visibility along the road right-of-ways was generally good to excellent. Imported road base gravels and fragments of asphalt were presented along road edges. In addition, modern bottle glass, fragmented auto parts, and other road side trash were observed along the project corridors. Within

19

the Nile Garden School campus, ground visibility was limited by asphalt and concrete surfaces, along with grass covered playing fields.

Native soils within the project corridor are a fine grain silty sandy loam with some small rounded gravels and a few sandstone rocks. Inspected soils have a general Munsell color value of 10yr 4/3 to 4/4, brown to dark yellowish brown (wet).

This survey did not result in the discovery or documentation of any previously unrecorded cultural resources. Several older wood frame homes and a barn were photographed along the west side of Union Road (stations 142+00, 143+00, 160+00).These structures are well outside of the project right-of-way and it appears this project will have no direct impact to any of these buildings. Proposed project activities within the Nile Garden School campus should not have any impact to the existing school structures. A single concrete irrigation gate feature and stand pipe were photographed along the north side of Nile Road (at approximately station 83+50). This feature appears to be relatively modern and is located just outside of the of the project right-of-way.

While the possibility of buried cultural deposits is of concern on valley floodplains, analysis of subsurface soil characteristics suggests that there is a low to moderate probability of buried cultural deposits within the project APE. Soils within the project area include well-developed sandy loams with mollic epipedons formed on older fans and terraces (Rosenthal and Meyer 2004b: Appendix D).

No other archaeological or other cultural resources were identified as a result of this cultural resources assessment. Analysis of soil characteristics for the proposed sites suggest there is a moderately low probability of buried archaeological deposits within the APE. Therefore, it is unlikely that the proposed action will have an effect on important archaeological, historical, or other cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation is therefore recommended. In the unlikely event that buried archaeological deposits are encountered within the project area, the finds must be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Should human remains be encountered, the County Coroner must be contacted immediately; if the remains are determined to be Native American, then the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted as well.

REFERENCES CITED Baloian, Mary Blark, Randy M. Baloian, and Wendy M. Nettles 2004 Cultural Resources Investigations for the South San Joaquin Irrigation District in San

Joaquin County, California. Applied EarthWorks Inc., Fresno, CA. On file, Central California Information Center, File # SJ-5309.

Basgall, M. E. and D. L. True 1985 Archaeological Investigations in Crowder Canyon, 1973-1984: Excavations at Sites

SBR-421B, SBR-421C, SBR-421D, and SBR-713. On file, Caltrans, Sacramento CA. Cook, S. F. 1960 Colonial Expeditions to the Interior of California, Central Valley, 1800-1820.

Anthropological Records 16:6. Gayton, A. H. 1948 Yokuts and Western Mono Ethnography I: Tulare Lake, Southern Valley, and Central

Foothill Yokuts. University of California Anthropological Records 10(1). Berkeley.

20

Kroeber, A. L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California (1976 Dover Edition). Bureau of American

Ethnology Bulletin 76, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. LaJeunesse, Roger M., and John M. Pryor 1996 Skyrocket Appendices. Report on file, Department of Anthropology, California State

University, Fresno. McGuire, Kelly R. 1995 Test Excavations at CA-FRE-61, Fresno County, California. Occasional Papers in

Anthropology 5. Museum of Anthropology, California State University Bakersfield. Rosenthal, Jeffrey S., and Jack Meyer 2004a Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record: A Geoarchaeological Study of the

Southern Santa Clara Valley and Surrounding Region. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis, Publication No. 14, University of California, Davis.

2004b Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 10 Rural Conventional Highways.

Volume III: Geoarchaeological Study, Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological record of Central California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Submitted to Caltrans Department of Transportation, District 10. On file, Central California Information Center, File No. ME 5501.

Rosenthal, Jeffrey S., Gregory G. White and Mark Q. Sutton 2007 The Central Valley: A View from the Catbird’s Seat. In California Prehistory:

Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, pp. 147-164, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. Alta Mira Press, New York.

Spier, Robert F.G. 1978 Foothill Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, edited by R.

F. Heizer, pp. 471-484. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Wallace, William J. 1954 The Little Sycamore Site and the Early Milling Stone Cultures of Southern California.

American Antiquity 20(2):112-123. 1978a Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. In Handbook of North American

Indians, vol. 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 25-36. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

1978b Northern Valley Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California,

edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 462-470. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1978c Northern Valley Yokuts. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California,

edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 448-461. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

1991 Tulare Lake’s Archaeological Past. In Background to a Study of Tulare Lake’s Archaeological Past, pp. 23-33. Contributions to Tulare Lake Archaeology 1.

21

PREPARER'S QUALIFICATIONS Douglas S. McIntosh completed the archaeological survey of the Project APE. Mr. McIntosh has over 25 years of experience in California archaeology and has served as field crew chief and lead field assistant for both historical and prehistoric resource investigations, including tasks of surveying, field mapping, excavation, field graphics, soils descriptions, photography, and general site documentation. He has served as an archaeological monitor for various aspects of earthmoving and grading activities for cultural resources, and as Laboratory assistant for both historical and prehistoric resources which includes processing soil samples, cleaning and cataloging historical and prehistoric artifacts and collections, and artifact illustration. Mr. McIntosh has conducted historical research which involves records, maps and archival searches, oral interviews, and documentation of historical photographic collections. C. Kristina Roper meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for archaeology. Ms. Roper has a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of California, Berkeley, and a M.A. in Cultural Resources Management from Sonoma State University. She has over 34 years of archaeological survey and excavation experience, including both prehistoric and historic sites, in California, Nevada, Oregon, and Idaho, and has produced over 250 professional reports. For the past 16 years Ms. Roper has served as a Lecturer in Anthropology at California State University, Fresno. Courses taught include World Prehistory, Introduction to Archaeology, Bio-Behavioral Evolution of the Human Species, Historical Archaeology, Critical Thinking, Food and Culture, Applied Anthropology, and Cultural Resources Management. Ms. Roper is a Registered Professional Archaeologist in good standing. As sole proprietor of a cultural resources management firm established in 1995, her responsibilities include all aspects of project management, from marketing and development, to project completion, and include NEPA, CEQA, and NHPA (Section 106) compliance.

Attachment A: Records Search (CCIC File # 10115L)

Report List

Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs

SJ-05309 2004 Cultural Resources Investigations for the South San Joaquin Irrigation District in San Joaquin County, California.

Applied Earthworks, Inc.; prepared for Russell Associates, Palo Alto, CA

Baloian, M., R. Baloian, and W. Nettles

39-000002, 39-000015, 39-000098, 39-000099, 39-000103, 39-000354, 39-004400, 39-004401, 39-004402, 39-004403, 39-004404, 39-004405, 39-004406, 39-004407, 39-004408, 39-004409, 39-004410, 39-004411, 39-004412, 39-004413, 39-004414, 39-004415, 39-004416, 39-004417

NADB-R - 1365195

SJ-06322 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Manteca Annexation Project, c. 60 acres Adjacent to Union Road and S.R. 120, San Joaquin County, California.

Genesis SocietyJensen, S.NADB-R - 1366547

SJ-06358 2007 An Archaeological Inventory Survey South Manteca High School Project, c. 70 acres Adjacent to Tinnin Road, Manteca, San Joaquin County, California.

Genesis SocietyJensen, S.NADB-R - 1366586

SJ-06625 1998 Cultural Resources Survey, South County Surface Water Project, San Joaquin County, California, South San Joaquin Irrigation District

ASI Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management (prepared for Environmental Science Associates, Inc.)

ASI Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management

39-000002, 39-000098, 39-000129, 39-000317, 39-000531, 39-000548, 50-000001

NADB-R - 1367290

SJ-06894 2008 Cultural Resources Inventory Report for Gas Line 108 Replacement Project for Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, City of Manteca San Joaquin County, CA

Garcia and AssociatesSiskin, B. and B. CoxNADB-R - 1367146

Page 1 of 1 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:55:56 PM

Report Detail: SJ-05309

Citation information

Year: 2004 (Jan)

Title: Cultural Resources Investigations for the South San Joaquin Irrigation District in San Joaquin County, California.

Affliliation: Applied Earthworks, Inc.; prepared for Russell Associates, Palo Alto, CA

No. pages: 39

Associated resources

General notes

Not all area of concern was surveyed; some was subject only to sensitivity analysis.

Address:

Collections: No

Disclosure: Not for publication

Location information

Author(s): Baloian, M., R. Baloian, and W. Nettles

Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/Historical, Field study, Other research

County(ies): San Joaquin

USGS quad(s): Lathrop, Manteca

Inventory size: Approximately 12.5 linear miles study area

No. maps: 3

Identifiers

Report No.: SJ-05309

Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals: No

No. resources: 24

PLSS:

Primary No. Trinomial Name

P-39-000002 CA-SJO-000250H Southern Pacific Railroad in San

P-39-000015 CA-SJO-000256H Tidewater Southern Railway

P-39-000098 CA-SJO-000292H Western Pacific / Union Pacific

P-39-000099 Canal T and Drainage Canal, So

P-39-000103 Drainage Ditch, South San Joaq

P-39-000354 CA-SJO-000241H Permanente Metals Corp. Magn

P-39-004400 8800 Woodward Ave

P-39-004401 9308 Woodward Ave

P-39-004402 9336 Woodward Avenue

P-39-004403 9362 Wodward Avenue

P-39-004404 19362 S. Austin Road

P-39-004405 19408 S. Austin Road

P-39-004406 135 Cottage Avenue

P-39-004407 2057 E. Yosemite Ave., Manteca

P-39-004408 18102 S. Austin Road

P-39-004409 18294 S. Austin Road

P-39-004410 18352 S. Austin Road

P-39-004411 18498 S. Austin Road

P-39-004412 18536 S. Austin Road

P-39-004413 18556 S. Austin Road

P-39-004414 18660 S. Austin Road

P-39-004415 18742 S. Austin Road

P-39-004416 18816 S. Austin Road

P-39-004417 Metal Barn, 19090 S. Austin Roa

Type Name

NADB-R 1365195

Page 1 of 3 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:56:41 PM


Database record metadata

Entered: 10/2/2013 jay

Last modified: 12/7/2015 rhards

IC actions:

Date User

Record status:

Date User Action taken

10/2/2013 jay Appended records from CCIC NADB database

1/22/2015 Anthro Edit by RH

Page 2 of 3 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:56:41 PM


Citation information

Year: 1998

Title: Cultural Resources Survey, South County Surface Water Project, San Joaquin County, California, South San Joaquin Irrigation District

Affliliation: ASI Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management (prepared for Environmental Science Associates, Inc.)

No. pages: 55


Entered: 10/2/2013 jay

Last modified: 3/18/2016 rhards

IC actions:

Associated resources

General notes

Water Treatment Plant Site: complete field survey. Proposed pipeline routes: overview & some windshield survey. No proper project or survey area maps; client badly drew on b/w record search maps; many match lines missing or off.

Date User

Address:

Collections: No

Disclosure: Not for publication

Record status:


Author(s): ASI Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management

Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/Historical, Field study, Other research

County(ies): San Joaquin

USGS quad(s): Avena, Escalon, Lathrop, Manteca, Oakdale, Ripon, Tracy , Vernalis

Inventory size:

No. maps:

Identifiers

Report No.: SJ-06625

Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals: No

No. resources: 7

PLSS:


10/2/2013 jay Appended records from CCIC NADB database

6/20/2014 anthro Notes/edits added by RH

Primary No. Trinomial Name

P-39-000002 CA-SJO-000250H Southern Pacific Railroad in San

P-39-000098 CA-SJO-000292H Western Pacific / Union Pacific

P-39-000129 Tracy Facility Railroad System (

P-39-000317 CA-SJO-000201 Vineyard

P-39-000531 First Landing Place of Sailing La

P-39-000548 Union Pacific Railroad Bridge

P-50-000001 CA-STA-000350H Southern Pacific Railroad line

Type Name

NADB-R 1367290

Extends into another county as ST-06625

Page 3 of 3 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:56:41 PM

Primary No. Trinomial

Resource List

Other IDs ReportsType Age Attribute codes Recorded by

P-39-005101 Resource Name - Nile Garden School

Building Historic HP15 (Educational building) - school

1991 (San Joaquin County Superintendent of Schools, Public Schools of San Joaquin County 1852-1990 (1991))

Page 1 of 1 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:39:32 PM

Resource Detail: P-39-005101

P-39-005101

Identifying information

Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes

General notes

Other IDs:

Recording events

Associated reports


County: San Joaquin

Address:


Entered: 9/30/2013

Last modified: 1/27/2014 Anthro

IC actions:

Date User

Collections:

Management status

Cross-refs:

Disclosure:

Nile Garden SchoolName:

Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Record status:

Building

Historic

Survey

HP15 (Educational building) - schoolAttribute codes:

USGS quad(s): Manteca

Type Name

Resource Name Nile Garden School

Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes

San Joaquin County Superintendent of Schools

Public Schools of San Joaquin County 1852-1990 (1991)

1/1/1991


9/30/2013 jay Added placeholder records to fill in primary number sequence.

Page 1 of 1 CCIC 12/7/2016 3:39:34 PM

Report List

Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs

SJ-00035 1981 Seven California Counties: An Archaeological Overview, Alpine, Calaveras, Mariposa, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties, California, Parts 1 & 2.

Institute for Archaeological Research, CSC Stanislaus; prepared for California State Office of Historic Preservation

Napton, L. K.NADB-R - 1365996

SJ-01900 1993 A Preliminary Cultural Resources Investigation of the South Manteca Area Plan, 7,800 acres in San Joaquin County, California.

CSU Stanislaus, Institute for Archaeological Research

Napton, L. K. 39-000282NADB-R - 1360590

SJ-04786 2002 City of Manteca--General Plan Update, Background Reports: Archaeological Resources, Historical Resources, Records Search Results.

Ric Windmiller, Consulting Archaeologist (and) Donald Napoli, of Historic Preservation Planning; for Wade Associates, Sacramento, CA

Windmiller, Ric and Donald Napoli

39-000002, 39-000015, 39-000098, 39-000099, 39-000102, 39-000103, 39-000111, 39-000282, 39-000354, 39-000681, 39-000682, 39-000683, 39-000684, 39-004148, 39-004188, 39-004189, 39-004190, 39-004191, 39-004192

NADB-R - 1364725

Page 1 of 1 CCIC 12/7/2016 4:08:08 PM

Attachment B: Native American Consultation

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

Native American Heritage Commission 1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691

916-373-3710916-373-5471 – [email protected]

Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search

Project: ______________________________________________________________________

County:______________________________________________________________________

USGS Quadrangle Name:_______________________________________________________

Township:__________ Range:__________ Section(s):__________

Company/Firm/Agency:_________________________________________________________

Street Address:________________________________________________________________

City:______________________________________________ Zip:______________________

Phone:_____________________________________________

Fax:_______________________________________________

Email:_____________________________________________

Project Description:

Nile Garden School Water Supply Project

San Joaquin

Manteca, CA 7.5'

2S 7E 7 & 18

Sierra Valley Cultural Planning

41845 Sierra Drive

Three Rivers 93271

559-288-6375

n/a

[email protected]

The proposed project is a water system upgrade project that includes the construction of new waterlines, installation of a tank and pumps, and the consolidation with an existing water utility system. The project includes a new well, new water lines, and treatment equipment at an existing school site. The project will consolidate the Nile Garden School water system with the City of Manteca water system. A Project Area Map is included with this request.

Map 2. Project Study Area, Nile Garden School Water Supply Project.

USGS Manteca, CA 7.5’ (1994) Township 2 S, Range 7 E, Sections 7, 18

Project Area

41845 Sierra Drive, Three Rivers, CA 93271 Tel.: (559) 288-6375 [email protected]

11 December 2016 California Valley Miwok Tribe 4620 Shippee Lane Stockton, CA 95212 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San

Joaquin County, CA Dear Sir/Madam:

An environmental assessment is being prepared for a proposed water supply project, located along the edges of Union Road, Oleander Avenue, Peach Road and Nile Road within a portion of the City of Manteca and within unincorporated portions of San Joaquin County, California (Township 2S, Range 7E, Sections 7 and 18, MDB&M). The project objective is to allow Nile Garden School to comply with the drinking water regulations and to obtain a new water source to solve the arsenic and nitrate non-compliance issue at the school site. The proposed project includes the construction of new waterlines, installation of a tank and pumps, and the consolidation with an existing water utility system. The project includes a new well, new water lines, and treatment equipment at an existing school site. Further, the project will consolidate the Nile Garden School water system with the City of Manteca water system.

Sierra Valley Cultural Planning has been asked to complete a cultural resources assessment for the proposed project which includes background research of the project area to address potential effects to cultural resources as a result of the proposed project. The project area is depicted on the enclosed map. No cultural resources were identified as a result of back ground research or during an on-the-ground survey of the proposed project area.

We are seeking information from Native American representatives in the area regarding the existence of culturally sensitive areas that could be affected by development-related activities in the project area. A search of the Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Land File failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. A records search with the Central California Information Center at California State University Stanislaus has also failed to identify any Native American cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The NAHC has recommended that we contact culturally affiliated tribes and interested Native American individuals that may have knowledge of the religious and cultural significance of historic properties in the project area vicinity so as to best avoid unanticipated discoveries to culturally important resources. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please give me a call at (559) 288-6375 if you have any questions. Respectfully, C. Kristina Roper Archaeologist


11 December 2016 Raymond Hitchcock, Chairperson Wilton Rancheria 9728 Kent Street Miwok Elk Grove, CA 95624 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San

Joaquin County, CA Dear Chairperson Hitchcock:





11 December 2016 Lois Martin, Chairperson Southern Sierra Miwuk Nation P.O. Box 186 Mariposa, CA 95338 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San Joaquin County, CA Dear Chairperson Martin:

An environmental assessment is being prepared for a proposed water supply project, located along the edges of Union Road, Oleander Avenue, Peach Road and Nile Road within a portion of the City of Manteca and within unincorporated portions of San Joaquin County, California (Township 2S, Range 7E, Sections 7 and 18, MDB&M). The project objective is to allow Nile Garden School to comply with the drinking water regulations and to obtain a new water source to solve the arsenic and nitrate non-compliance issue at the school site. The proposed project includes the construction of new waterlines, installation of a tank and pumps, and the consolidation with an existing water utility system. The project includes a new well, new water lines, and treatment equipment at an existing school site. Further, the project will consolidate the Nile Garden School water system with the City of Manteca water system. Sierra Valley Cultural Planning has been asked to complete a cultural resources assessment for the proposed project which includes background research of the project area to address potential effects to cultural resources as a result of the proposed project. The project area is depicted on the enclosed map. No cultural resources were identified as a result of back ground research or during an on-the-ground survey of the proposed project area.



11 December 2016 Crystal Martinez, Chairperson lone Band of Miwok Indians P.O. Box 699 Plymouth, CA 95669 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San

Joaquin County, CA Dear Chairperson Martinez:


Sierra Valley Cultural Planning has been asked to complete a cultural resources

assessment for the proposed project which includes background research of the project area to address potential effects to cultural resources as a result of the proposed project. The project area is depicted on the enclosed map. No cultural resources were identified as a result of back ground research or during an on-the-ground survey of the proposed project area.

We are seeking information from Native American representatives in the area regarding

the existence of culturally sensitive areas that could be affected by development-related activities in the project area. A search of the Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Land File failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. A records search with the Central California Information Center at California State University Stanislaus has also failed to identify any Native American cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The NAHC has recommended that we contact culturally affiliated tribes and interested Native American individuals that may have knowledge of the religious and cultural significance of historic properties in the project area vicinity so as to best avoid unanticipated discoveries to culturally important resources.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please give me a call at (559) 288-6375 if you have any questions. Respectfully, C. Kristina Roper Archaeologist


11 December 2016 Katherine Erolinda Perez, Chairperson North Valley Yokuts Tribe P.O. Box 717 Linden, CA 95236 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San

Joaquin County, CA Dear Chairperson Perez:





11 December 2016 Rhonda Morningstar Pope, Chairperson Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians 1418 20th Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95811 Re: Proposed Nile Garden Water Supply Project, 5700 E. Nile Road, Manteca, San

Joaquin County, CA Dear Chairperson Pope:




Department: SO Type: Consent

Item Number: 1 Manteca Unified School District

Board of Education Meeting Agenda Item

DATE: April 18, 2017

DEPARTMENT: Superintendent's Office

TITLE: Approve Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 7, 2017

Background/Rationale: Enclosed are the minutes of the regular meeting of March 7, 2017. The Board shall review and approve the minutes. Upon approval, the minutes will be posted and retained in accordance with the law.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approval.

Prepared By: Superintendent's Office

Presentation: M No

Yes (attached) Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Approved/Reviewed By: ,V

2271 [Fest Louise Aye., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oard ]Qendas

4.1.1 MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

BOARD OF EDUCATION

Minutes of the Regular Board of Education Meeting of Tuesday, March 7, 2017 Board Meeting Recorded — Board Audio

TIME/DATE/PLACE/ROLL CALL AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A QUORUM The regular meeting of the Board of Education was called to order by President Stephen J. Schluer at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, in the District Office, 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, California.

Members present other than President Schluer were: Eric Duncan, Sr., Kathy Howe, Evelyn Moore, Michael Seelve, and Bob Wallace. Trustee Nancy Teicheira was absent.

Also in attendance was Superintendent Jason Messer, Deputy Superintendent Clark Burke, Ed.D., and Deputy Superintendent Roger Goatcher.

PUBLIC COMMENT There were no comments from the public.

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS President Schluer adjourned the meeting at 6:01 p.m. to discuss with the Superintendent/designee the following closed session items: Student Disciplinary Actions: 17-016W, 17-017W, 17-018W, 17-019W, 17-020W, 17-021W, and 17-022W; Public School Employment, Certificated Personnel; Public School Employment, Classified Personnel; Public School Employment, School Site Assistants; Public Employee Performance Evaluation: Superintendent; Public School Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release/Reassignment/Evaluation of Performance (Government Code 54957); Conference With Labor Negotiators, Manteca Educators Association/CTA/NEA, Pursuant to Government Code 54957.6, Roger Goatcher, Negotiator; Conference With Labor Negotiator, Jason Messer, Regarding Certificated Administrative and Classified Administrative/Supervisory Unrepresented Groups, Pursuant to Government Code 54957.6; Conference With Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation, Significant Exposure to Litigation, Government Code Section 54956.9(b) — One Case; and Conference With Real Property Negotiator, Jason Messer, Negotiator (Government Codc 54956.8).

OPEN SESSION The meeting reconvened for open session at 7:08 p.m.

Others joining the meeting were: Student Board Member Joe Contreras; Senior Director of Business Services/CBO Jacqui Breitenbucher; Senior Director of Secondary Education Clara Schmiedt; MEA President Ericka Meadows; CSEA, Chapter 50 President, Charlie Richardson; and other school employees and interested citizens. (De Leon, Rembulat)

FLAG SALUTE President Schluer led the salute to the flag.

ANNOUNCEMENTS President Schluer announced that at the conclusion of open session, the Board would adjourn to closed session.

Board Minutes March 7, 2017 Page 2

President Schluer announced that during closed session the Board considered a resolution to reassign certificated administrators. Trustee Howe made a motion and seconded by Trustee Wallace to approve the resolution. The motion passed by the following vote: six ayes, zero noes and one absent (Member "feicheira).

In addition, during closed session the Board voted to reject the claim filed by Alfred Caldron. Legal counsel will be instructed to defend the District against any ensuing litigation. The motion passed by the following vote: six ayes, zero noes and one absent (Member Teicheira).

NOTICE Report of Visits to Schools by the San Joaquin County Superintendent in Accordance to the Education Code 1240(c)(H) In accordance to the Education Code 1240(c)(H), the San Joaquin County Superintendent visited identified schools in Manteca Unified School District as presented.

CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS President Schluer stated that items listed under the consent agenda are considered routine, and acted on by the Board of Trustees in one motion. There is no discussion prior to the Board vote unless a member of the Board requests to speak to a specific item, and/or request to have an item removed from the consent agenda. President Schluer asked if any member of the Board wished to pull, amend or abstain from any specific consent agenda item. No members of the Board wished to pull any items; therefore, President Schluer moved to public comment.

Josh Vega and students from Manteca High School spoke to item 7, Authorizing the Month of April as Distracted Driving Awareness Month. They shared that they are taking part in the all-state Safety Center and Allstate Teen Safe Driving contest and are spreading the word on the importance of distracted driving among teens. The slogan campaign is "Stay Alive - Don't text and Drive." By the adoption of the resolution will allow promotion of the campaign.

A motion was made by Trustee Moore and a second was made by Trustee Wallace to approve and adopt the following consent agenda items: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 14, 2017; Accept Receipt of Donations; Resolution 16/17-66, Authorizing the Absence of Board Member Nancy Teicheira From the Meeting of Tuesday, February 14, 2017, Due to Illness; Adoption of Revised Board Bylaw 9322, Agenda/Meeting Materials — Second Reading and Final Adoption; Adoption of Revised Board Bylaw 9323, Meeting Conduct — Second Reading and Final Adoption; Adoption of New Board Bylaw 9400, Board Self ,valuation — Second Reading and Final Adoption; Adoption of Resolution 16/17-67, Authorizing the Month

of April as Distracted Driving Awareness Month; Adoption of Amended Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators for the 2016-2017 School Year; Approval of Short Term Staff Permits; Approval of Provisional Intern Permits; Adoption of Certificated Personnel Assignment Order 17-07, Adoption of Classified Personnel Assignment Order 17-08, and Adoption of School Site Assistant Personnel Assignment Order 17-09; Adoption of Resolution 16/17-63„Authorizing 2016-2017 Intrabudget Transfers for General Fund 01 and Other Funds — Second Interim Report Period; Acceptance of District Warrants as presented; and adoption of Student Disciplinary Actions: 17-016W, 17-017W, 17-018W, 17-019W; 17-020W; 17-021W; and 17-022W.


Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelve, Wallace (Contreras preferential vole) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUESTS TO SPEAK FROM THE PUBLIC The following community members spoke: Ericka Meadows spoke about the importance of quality educators, increase in teachers' compensation, staffing of interns/pre-terns, budget, and our teachers always putting students first. Karen Pearsall referenced her comments from last meeting regarding Middle Grades and that even though she is not against a charter, the importance of school librarian teachers will serve more students. Ken Johnson spoke in regards to teacher compensation, the increase of the District budget, compared compensations from other employee groups, and poor management of the budget. Jeneva Spencer spoke in favor of increasing teacher salary to the increase of cost of living. Andrew Anderson spoke to budget and the shape of spending, and need to have a fair increase to teachers' salaries.

ACTION ITEMS 1. Report: Growth Update From Steering Committee Victoria Brunn, Public Information Officer/Director of Community Outreach provided a brief presentation on the development of the Growth Steering Committee. The Committee responds and plans for growth using a comprehensive strategy to ensure that all voices are heard in the areas of: Facilities, Deferred Maintenance, Budget, Enrollment, Staffing, and Programming to meet the evolving needs of all students in MUSD. As part of monitoring growth, the Committee will provide monthly updates to the Board of Education. The areas of focus are: 1) top growth concerns; 2) top modernization projects; 3) top facilities conditions/needs and 4) top fiscal funding issues.

No action required.

2. Consider Approval of Naming Committee's Recommendation to Name the Basketball Court at East Union High School

The members of the naming committee: Clara Schmiedt, Director of Secondary Education; j j Ramirez, Vice Principal, East Union High School; Shubnaz Jagpal, Student Board representative; Eric Simoni, community member; and Ryan Lagomarsino, community member. The committee received two suggestions to name the basketball court at East Union. Both suggestions received are to name the facility "Bill Stricker Court." The committee is recommending naming the basketball court at East Union High School "Bill Stricker Court.

A motion was made by Trustee Seelye and a second was made by Trustee Moore and approve the committee's recommendation and name the basketball court at East Union High School "Bill Stricker Court." Call for discussion. There was a brief discussion relating to timeline after a facility is named.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelye, Wallace (Contreras preferential vote) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.


3. Consider, Discuss and Give Direction Regarding Elementary Counseling Program A motion was made by Trustee Howe and a second was made by Trustee Wallace to table the above-mentioned item to the next regular Board meeting (April 18).

Gerri Brown (community member) spoke in regards to proposing a preventative counseling program in conjunction with the current Valley Community Counseling. Employ a full time counselor. Through interactions with the counselor, the students and teachers would be able to implement strategies that would influence the learning environment.


4. Consider and Discuss the Addition of a Supervisor of Grounds, Fields and Landscape Services (Job Description 203.92)

Superintendent Messer reviewed the conditions of the high school athletic facilities and the potential of moving to an all-weather track. Mr. Messer shared the concerns with the unsafe conditions and identified three challenges: 1) resources 2) accountability 3) expertise. He reviewed the current staffing at the sites and the lack of resources. The addition of a Supervisor of Grounds, Fields and Landscape Services primary focus would be fields at the sites (high school). The recommendation would be to add a supervisor who would be responsible for the five comprehensive high schools (working supervisor position). Currently, the high school principal is responsible for directing the grounds men in addition to the input from the athletic director. Trustee Wallace commented that he visited sites with Mr. Bowers, Director of Operations/Facilities; the facilities are in poor conditions and expressed concern with our students using those fields. Mr. Messer clarified that there will be two equal level supervisors: one for high school and one for elementary.

Trustee Howe inquired who is currently overseeing the fields. Mr. Messer said that the principals of the high schools are in charge. Trustee Wallace expressed concerns that our students are using the fields in their current unsafe conditions.

Trustee Seelye made the motion and seconded by Trustee Moore to add an additional supervisor. Call for discussion.

The following community members spoke to this item: Nina Norton is not in favor of adding an additional supervisor and stated that the fields are in poor conditions not because of the principal or athletic directors at the sites, but due to the lack of funds. The salary from the proposed additional supervisor should be used toward field repairs. Jeff McLarty spoke about the issues and that it originated by separating the supervisors. He said that the lack of funds at the high schools is an issue. They do not receive the support from the main grounds department. The creation of another supervisor would not solve the issue.

President Schluer asked if by adding an additional supervisor would remove the principal from the equation. Mr. Messer responded that the principal would still provide input to the supervisor. i\ brief discussion


ensued among Board members and the Superintendent regarding budget for high school and elementary, allocation of responsibilities, manage and define the position, add staff, required certification, and the current conditions of the athletic/track fields.

President Schluer would like to know the history of the position, available funds, and if there is an alternative to the situation other than creating another supervisor position. Further, he does not believe we should take power away from the principals. They should be able to adequately supervise and express concern if the fields require maintenance. He asked to work together as a group and bring back more refine information. Trustee Howe added that prior to making a decision, she would like input from the grounds men and principals what they think would solve the problem.

A motion was made by Trustee Wallace and a second was made by Trustee Seelye to table the above-mentioned item to the next regular Board meeting (April 18) and receive more information.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelye, Wallace (Contreras preprentiul vote) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

5. Report: Toe Contreras Student Board Report Joe Contreras, Student Board member reported on the school activities and events. With excitement, he reported that for the first time in MUSD history, all Five comprehensive high schools have a boys' volleyball team competing in the Valley Oak League. Joe is on the Weston Ranch High school boys' volleyball team. Weston Ranch will hold a Delta Blood Bank on March 15. From March 16 through March 18 HOSA will attend the SLC, and on March 18 JROTC will have an all-day drill competition in Ripon. Manteca High held Winterfest from February 6 to February 10. The Winterfest Rally (February 10) they announced their Prince, Nick Pio and King Gino Campiotti. At half time, they announced their princess Jayda Jackson and Queen Simran Kaur. February 8 they held the annual Kicking for a Cure soccer game. Sadie's Hawkins Dance was on February 25. Joe continued to report that with Lathrop High the Black Student Union (BSU) hosted Black History Month on February 25 sponsored by Inspired T-shirts. The week of February 28 through March 3, Lathrop High collected money for Leukemia foundation Pennies for Patients. The week of February 21 through February 24 FFA club and agricultural classes at Lathrop High school planned a week of agricultural activities for students and staff. East Union and Sierra High Leadership hosted a Leadership VOL on February 23 this year theme "Leadership, its More Than a Title." The Theater and Choir programs performed an original piece written by their new choir instructor, Gary Frit7en, Toy Camp. j ROTC competed in the Fresno State Competition on February 11 and participated in the Franklin Sports Competition on February 25. Be.tech High Industrial Arts students attended a field trip to Holt of California and Delta Colleges. The be.First have been assisting Manteca Ambulance teach Hands Only CPR to freshmen. On March 30, the First Responders will assist the Manteca Ambulance at Lathrop High. March 1, the Manteca and Stockton Police K-9 unit used their facilities as a training site. Approximately 20 police dogs and their handlers practiced various scenarios. Lastly, he said that the Student Board members would meet on March 17 to review the LCAP and discuss student board members for the next school year.


To read each high school's student representative report, be sure to view the weekly highlights on the Outreach page at www.mantecausd.net/outreach/board-highlights.

Recess President Schluer called for a recess at 8:30 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:36 p.m.

6. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-53, Accepting Final Completion of Lease/Leaseback Contract for the Shasta Elementary School Modernization Project, F&H Construction; 7. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-54, Accepting Final Completion of Lease/Leaseback Contract for the Sequoia Elementary School Modernization Project, C.T. Brayton & Sons; and 8. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-61, Accepting Final Completion of Lease/Leaseback Contract for the Lincoln Elementary School Modernization Project, CT Brayton & Sons Aaron Bowers, Director of Operations/Facilities provided a brief background and summary of the punch list for Shasta, Sequoia and Lincoln Elementary Schools.

A motion was made by Trustee Moore and a second was made by Trustee Seelve to adoption the above-mentioned items.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelye, Wallace (Contreras prele rential vole) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

9. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-68, Regarding the Determination of District Needs in Selected Certificated Positions/Competency Standards A motion was made by Trustee Moore and a second was made by Trustee Wallace to adopt the above-mentioned item.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelve, Wallace (Contreras preferential vote) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

10. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-65, in the Matter of Reduction or Discontinuance of Particular Kinds Certificated High School Services for the 2017-2018 School Year A motion was made by Trustee Moore and a second was made by Trustee Seelve to adopt the above mentioned item.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelye, Wallace (0171i-eras preferential vole) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.


11. Consider Approval of Short-Term Classified Employees for Specified Positions and Times A motion was made by Trustee Seelye and a second was made by Trustee Moore to approve the above-mentioned item as presented.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelye, Wallace (Contrennrep; rential role) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

12. Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-62, Authorization Given to Board of Education President to Sign Positive Certification Declaring the Manteca Unified School District Will be Able to Meet Its Financial Obligations for the Remainder of the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 and Subsequent Two Years Jacqui Breitenbucher, CBO/Senior Director of Business Services, presented a PowerPoint on the Second Interim.

A motion was made by Trustee Wallace and a second was made by Trustee Seelve to adopt the above mentioned item as presented.

Ayes: Duncan, Howe, Moore, Schluer, Seelve, Wallace (Contreras preferential vole) Noes: None Absent: Teicheira Motion passed.

13. Consider Approval of Request for Allowance of Attendance (Nile Garden Elementary School) Because of Emergency Conditions — Form J-13A A motion was made by Trustee Moore and a second was made by Trustee Wallace to approve the above-mentioned item.


FUTURE BOARD AGENDA ITEM(S) Trustee Duncan would like to have discussion regarding track and field's improvements.

BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Duncan commented that important information transpired this evening, including teacher salaries. Considering that he is in education, he understands the importance. Mr. Duncan shared that he is an advocate of facilities; however, we need to make sure that the teachers are taken care of. As a new Trustee, he will continue to investigate the numbers and each meeting is another learning opportunity. He appreciates the structure of the district and that if we do not take care of our people it may falter.


Student Board Member Contreras commented that the boys' volleyball team played against Los Banos at Los Banos High School. When he saw the Los Banos District building, he was reminded of the importance of a Student School Board. He shared his experience with the Weston Ranch E-15 program. He was a participant in the program and it was an overall great experience and well received by the students.

Trustee Seelye commented that he participated in Read Across America and read in several third grade classrooms at New Haven Elementary School. Mr. Seelye enjoyed interacting with the students.

Trustee Howe commented that she also participated in Read Across America at McParland Elementary School and read to a second grade class and two kindergarten classrooms. She also attended the JROTC at Franklin High School and was impressed with the group of students. The East Union team competed and did a very good job. She is proud of them.

Trustee Wallace expressed his appreciation to Dr. Burke, Mr. Goatcher, Mr. Bowers, and Mrs. Breitenbucher for their time. He had good visits and learned a great deal.

President Schluer commented that he appreciates the meeting ending early considering that he has been very busy with his job (Manteca PD). He has been looking into the achievement gap and working on closing the achievement gap. As he becomes more familiar with the achievement gap, he would like to have the opportunity to share what he has learned at a future meeting.

CLOSED SESSION The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. for closed session.

OPEN SESSION/ANNOUNCEMENT The meeting reconvened at 9:46 p.m. There were no announcements to report from closed session.

ADJOURNMENT As there were no further business to come before the meeting was adjourned at 9:47 p.m. The Board of Education will meet on Tuesday, April 11, 2017, Study Session (Budget), at Manteca USD Administration Office, 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca.

Stephen J. Schluer, President Jason Messer, Secretary to the Board Manteca Unified School District Manteca Unified School District


Agenda Item


Item Number: 2



TITLE: Adopt Resolution 16/17-70, Authorizing Absence of Board Member Nancy Teicheira From Meeting of Tuesday, March 7, 2017 Due to Illness

Background/ Rationale: The Education Code 35120 allows for a Board member to receive compensation for a missed Board meeting if the Board finds that the member had a hardship. Trustee Nancy Teicheira was not able to attend the Board meeting of Tuesday, March 7, 2017, due to illness.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Board adoption.

Presentation: 171 No



2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oard .-1,gendas

BEFORE THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION 16/17-70

AUTHORIZING ABSENCE OF BOARD MEMBER, NANCY TEICHEIRA, FROM MEETING OF TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2017, DUE TO ILLNESS

WHEREAS, Board of Education members receive compensation as established by Education Code 35120; and

WHEREAS, a member may be compensated for any meeting when absent if the Board, by resolution duly adopted and included in its minutes, finds that at the time of the meeting the member was absent due to a hardship deemed acceptable by the Board; and

WHEREAS, Trustee Nancy Teicheira, was not be able to attend the meeting of Tuesday, March 7„ 2017, due to illness.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Trustee Nancy Teicheira's compensation continues to be uninterrupted pursuant to Education Code 35120 (c).

PASSED AND ADOPTED, this eighteenth day of April of 2017, by the following vote of the Board of Education of the Manteca Unified School District, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTION:

STEPHEN J. SCHLUER, PRESIDENT EVELYN MOORE, CLERK BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF EDUCATION


Agenda Item


Item Number: 3



TITLE: Approve Superintendent's Termination of After School Program (Weston Ranch) Agreement

Background/ Rationale: The Superintendent terminated a Memorandum of Understanding effective April 3, 2017. This item is on the agenda for Board acceptance of termination.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Board adoption.

Presentation: 171 No



2271 Nest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oard

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

STOCKTON KIDS CLUB and MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

'Revised'

This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is hereby made and entered into by and between Manteca Unified School District, hereinafter referred to as ("MUSD"), Stockton Kids Club hereinafter referred to as ("SKC') and Weston Ranch area, hereinafter referred to as ("WR"). SKC will provide an after school program in the Weston Ranch area. In exchange for services, MUSD will pay an amount invoiced monthly for ten (10) months (not to exceed $125,000.00). This contract will expire on June 1, 2017.

PURPOSE The purpose of this MOU is to continue to develop and expand a framework of cooperation between MUSD, SKC and WR, to develop a mutually beneficial program that benefits our students and community-

WR/MUSD SHALL 1) Provide dedicated or shared space -of a minimum of five (5) classrooms with storage space (it is

preferred that one room be the cafeteria) with lighted -waking path, from the time school is dismissed until at least 6:00 p.m. for services to be provided throughout the year. SKC program will not operate on non-student days and minimum days unless approved by the Site Principal.

2) Agree to allow student surveys to be distributed to students to assure we are meeting their wants and needs with programs offered.

3) Agree to have program enrollment forms distributed with school documents prior to the start of school year.

4) MUSD will provide daily meals with space provided by WR. 5) Coordinate with school faculty to have school clubs connect with the after school program. 6) Allow SKC to recruit students by class visits, speaking at assemblies, special school events where

appropriate and staff meetings, etc., prior approval from site administration. 7) Distribute program information at back to school nights, special events, and newsletters. 8) Make announcements pertaining to the program. 9) Provide daily custodial services (usually just a change in cleaning schedule). 10) Provide convenient access to bathrooms -during program hours. 11) Provide a-location for the-pickup ofcorrespondence and messages.

SKC SHALL 1) During the entire term of the MOU and any extension or modification thereof, the SKC shall keep

in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements: a. Liability Insurance: The SKC shall be required to provide comprehensive general liability

insurance coverage in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limit per occurrence and $3,000,000.00 aggregate providing damage liabilities with specific language referencing bodily injury, molestation, child abuse and propertydarnage. A separate additional insured endorsement (CG 2010 or its direct equivalent) shall be endorsed to include the MUSD and its Governing Board, its Officers, its Agents, its Employees and its Volunteers as additional named insured in the policy It is agreed that the insurance provided by the SKC is endorsed as primary to any similar insurance or self-insurance carried by MUSD.

b. Workers' Compensation: If the SKC employs any person to perform work in connection with this agreement, the SKC agrees to provide workers' compensation insurance for SKC employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless and inderanifyMUSD for any and_all claims arising out of injury-, disability; or death of any of the SKC employees or agents. Proof of Workers' Compensation (waiver of subrogation to part of this coverage).

c. The SKC policy shall contain a contractual liability endorsement extending coverage to include the liability assumed by a hold harmless clause in the agreement between MUSD and the SKC. This hold harmless clause of the agreement shall provide that the SKC shall indemnify; defend, and hold MUSD, its governing board, its officers, its agents, its employees, and its volunteers harmless of and from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, and suits, accruing or resulting from any losses, damage, injury or whatsoever nature and howsoever the same may be caused or may arise resulting directly or indirectly arising out of, or anyway connected with, the services covered by the agreement

d. The SKC shall furnish MUSD Certificates of Insurance evidencing the coverage specified under this agreement and specifying that said insurance shall not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior notice to MUSD.

2) Meet all guidelines required by MUSD. 3) Complete all required documents and reports and submit a monthly participation report, including

a monthly calendar of events report to the Senior Director of Secondary Education and site Principal.

4) Submit a- monthly attendance report to the Site Principal and Senior Director of Secondary Education.

5) Administer a quality After School Program. 6) Provide dailyhomework assistance to students that are in need of assistance to reach their academic

potential. 7) Provide academic enrichment and youth development activities (that can include offsite field trips)

and programs that support the school's core curriculum and district/state standards. 8) Operate directly after school with a staff/student ratio of no less than 1 to 20. Ratio will include

anyone providing programs (contracted staff, existing teachers etc.). 9) Provide appropriate and qualified staff and volunteers complete with Department of Justice

background clearance at no cost to the school or District. Documentation of clearance must be provided to MUSD prior to first day of employment on campus.

10) Manage the SKC employees and volunteers and subcontractors of the programs. In addition, SKC is responsible for notifying the site Principal and Senior Director of Secondary Education when a staff member has been added and will be on campus or any staff member changes.

11) Provide all the resources needed for the After School Program, pens, paper, equipment, etc. 12) Partner and work closely with all on site after school activities. 13) Work closely with school faculty and administration on all aspects of the program. 14) Seek additional resources and in-kind services to supplement the program. 15) Provide access to community partners that will provide activities/information to broaden student

interest/horizons. 16) Maintain current insurance policies per MUSD district requirements.

MOU-SKC/MUSD Page 2 of 3 — *Revised July1, 2016 June 1, 2017

ser, Superint dent Date

ca Unified Scho 1 District

Sharon Simas, Chair of Board Stockton Kicks Club

Date

MOUSKC/MUSD Page 3 of 3 - *Revised July 1, 2016 - June 1, 2017

This MOU will be in effect until June 1, 2017, unless either party chooses to dissolve it with thirty (30) days' notice.

At all times involved in the MOU, SKC shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the MUSD, its governing board, its officers, its agents, its employees, and its volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses of whatever nature, including court costs and attorney fees arising out of, or resulting from, acts of negligence or willful misconduct of Manteca Unified School District, its licensees and invitees, officers, whether employed or subcontracted, officers, agents and employees.

Each person signing below represents and warrants that he or she has the authority to sign on behalf of the entity on whose behalf that person is signing, and that he or she has the authority to bind the entity to this agreement.

4,4MFA r

-'eoo Phone (209) 858-0729

Fax (209) 858-7570 www.mantecausd.net

Office of the SUPERINTENDENT Manteca Unified School District

Jason Messer, Superintendent

March 3, 2017

Via Certified Mail Ms. Sharon Simas Stockton Kids Club 303 Olympic Circle P.O. Box 5483 Stockton, CA 95205

Re: Stockton Kids Club Program at Weston Ranch High School

Dear Ms. Simas:

This letter is to inform you that Manteca Unified School District will be revoking the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement with the Stockton Kids Club (SKC).

The MOU agreement states, "This MOU will be in effect until June, 1, 2017, unless either party chooses to dissolve it with thirty (30) days' notice." The last day for the Weston Ranch program will be April 3, 2017, which is thirty days from today. Over the next thirty days, we will work with SKC to make a smooth transition to the program.

Thank

i Jason Meser Districti§uperintendent

C: / Mr. Roger Goatcher, Deputy Superintendent, Educational Services/MUSD Clara Schmiedt, Sr. Director of Secondary Education/MUSD Francine Baird, Principal, Weston Ranch High School/MUSD

P.O. Box 32 Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337


Agenda Item


Item Number: 4


TITLE: Accept Receipt of Donations

Background/ Rationale: Manteca Unified School District is in receipt of donations from the following donors. Upon receipt of these gifts, letters will be sent to the donors expressing the Board's gratitude.

Lathrop High School Donations BMW Management Monetary Stockton Bingo Monetary Jostens Monetary Republic Services Monetary

Brock Elliott Elementary School Donation Orchard Supply Hardware Clay Pots

Weston Ranch High Donation BMW Management Monetary Anthony Matthews Monetary

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approval of these gifts.

Presentation: EA No ❑ Yes (attached) El Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.


2271 West Louise Are., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board

Department: ES/P Type: Consent

Item Number: 5 Manteca Unified School District

Board of Education Meeting Agenda Item


DEPARTMENT: Secondary Education

TITLE: Consider Approval of Requests to Waive Credits in Physical Education from High School Graduation Requirement for High School Students (ESX50741)

Background/Rationale: The following requests are from the High Schools requesting to waive credits in physical education from high school graduation requirement. Enclosed are the letters from the Coordinator of Health Services and doctor's note excusing the student from participating in all physical education for the remainder of the individual student's high school career.

SCHOOL DIAGONOSIS WAIVE CREDITS

Sierra High School Back Injury 20 credits

Sierra High School Scoliosis 20 credits

Sierra High School Septic Hip 15 credits

Weston Ranch High School Pulmonary Condition 5 credits

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation Administration recommends Board approval.

Prepared By: Secondary Education

Presentation: Z No N Yes (attached) nYes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Approved/Reviewed By:

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board As,endas

311 E. North St

Manteca, CA 95336 Phone (209) 858-0782

Fax (209) 858-7513 w ww.mantecausd.net

Department of: Health Services

Manteca Unified School District Leslie Agostini, MS., B.S .N., RN., Coordinator of Health Services

lagostinirc4musd.net

March 17, 2017

To: Clara Schmiedt, Director of Secondary Education

MUSD Board of Education Trustees

From: Leslie Agostini

Re: PE Graduation Exemption for SHS Student, t 12th grade

Attached you will find medical notes requesting that be excused from all PE

activities. This will require the exemption of all Physical Eaucation credits required

for graduation. This student has had a back injury which causes chronic pain. ' is

followed by Kaiser Permanente specialists. parents and medical provider

are requesting that receive an exemption for all PE credits.

I recommend that this request be granted as does Mr. Clark, Principal, Sierra High

School.

Thank you.

C. Steve Clark, Principal SHS

Dan Beukelman, Assistant Principal SHS

Adrian Hernandez, Counseling Department SHS

Loretta Tefertiller, School Nurse SHS

Phone (209) 858-0782 Fax (209) 858-7513

www.mantecausd.net

Department of: Health Services Manteca Unified School District Leslie Agostini, M.S., B.S .N., KN., Coordinator of Health Services

lagostinamusd.net

March 17, 2017




Re: PE Graduation Exemption for SHS Student, 12th grade

Attached you will find medical notes advising that not participate in PE for

the duration of - high school attendance. This will require the exemption of all

Physical Education credits required for graduation. This student has scoliosis, which

had progressed until required surgery in April 2015. continues to have

chronic back pain and is followed by Kaiser Permanente specialists.

parents and medical provider are requesting that receive an exemption for all PE

credits.


School.

Thank you.



Kristy Angove, Counseling Department SHS


311 E. North St Manteca, CA 95336


Phone (209) 858-0782 Fax (209) 858-7513

www.mantecausd.net


Manteca Unified School District Leslie Agostini, M.S., B.S.N., RN, Coordinator of Health Services

lagostini(c4musd.net

March 17, 2017




Re: PE Graduation Exemption for SHS Student, , 12th grade

Attached you will find a medical note requesting no PE for for the remainder

of - high school attendance. This will require the exemption of Physical Education

credits required for graduation. This student had a septic hip as a child which has

required numerous surgeries on • hip joint and knee. has completed 5 of

PE credits, but do to medical limitations has been unable to participate in PE

since August 2014.


School.

Thank you.



Amber Talcott, Counseling Department SHS


Phone (209) 858-0782 Fax (209) 858-7513

ww w. mantecausd .net



Manteca Unified School District Leslie Agostini, MS., B.S.N., RN, Coordinator of Health Services

[email protected]

March 17, 2017




Re: PE Graduation Exemption for WRHS Student 12th grade

Attached you will find a medical note requesting excusal from PE due to a pulmonary

condition. This will require the exemption of Physical Education credits required for

graduation. has completed all but 5 credits prior to an acute incident

requiring surgery in February 2015. Since that time, has not been able to

participate in PE due to high risk of a repeat of the incident. Due to physical

condition, parents and physician have requested a waiver of remaining PE credits.

I recommend that this request be granted as does Mrs. Baird, Principal, Weston

Ranch High School

Thank you.

C. Francine Baird, Principal WRHS

Brad Harrison, Assistant Principal WRHS

Linda Wheeler, Counseling Department WRHS

Rhonda Peacock, School Nurse EUHS


Agenda Item

Department: OS/HR Type: Consent

Item Number: 9

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Human Resources

TITLE: Approval of Short Term Staff Permits

Background/Rationale: The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing allows districts to apply for Short-Term Staff Permits to fill acute staffing needs by hiring individuals as teachers and substitutes who have not vet met the subject matter competence requirements needed to enter internship programs. The District has completed a diligent search for suitable credentialed teachers or qualified intern teachers. This permit allows holders to work while completing subject matter competence requirements.

• Almanza, Justine — Special Education Teacher, Great Valley Elementary School

• Willis, Nina — Special Education Teacher, Weston Ranch High School

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Administration recommends approval.

Presentation: ®No p Yes (attached) El Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved By: Certificated Personnel Department Clark Burke, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent

2271 Irest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oard -10/rias

French Camp Lathrop Manteca Weston Ranch Manteca Unified School District

Bonnie Bennett., Director II: Certificated Personnel Services

Meeting Date: March 7, 2017

Category: Other Consent Item

Type: Short Term Staff Permit and Approval

Subject: The Board of Education will consider a Short Term Staff Permit for a Special Education Teacher

File Attachment: The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing requires Board of Education approval to assign certificated personnel on a Short Term Staff Permit. The request for a Short Term Staff Permit states that the District has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. Below is the name of the employee and the subject area assigned for the 2016-2017 school year. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing allows Districts to apply for Short Term Staff Permits to fill an acute staffing need by hiring an individual who has not yet met the subject matter competence requirement needed to enter an internship program. The district has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. This permit will allow Justine Almanza to work as a Special Education Teacher while she completes the subject matter competence requirement.

Summary: Justine Almanza Great Valley Elementary School Special Education Teacher

Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of employment of the above employee and assignment for the 2016-2017 school year.

Approvals: Bonnie Bennett — Director of Certificated Personnel

Clark Buke, Ed.D. — Deputy Superintendent

CS7

Phone (209(3 858-0794 Fax (209 825-3238

bhennett musd.net

P.O. Box 32, Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95336 www.mantecausd.net

French Camp Lathrop Manteca Weston Rano Manteca Unified School District

Bonnie Bennett., Director II: Certificated Personnel Services

Meeting Date: April 18, 2017


Type: Short Term Staff Permit and Approval

Subject: The Board of Education will consider a Short Term Staff Permit for a Special Education Teacher

File Attachment: The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing requires Board of Education approval to assign certificated personnel on a Short Term Staff Permit. The request for a Short Term Staff Permit states that the District has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. Below is the name of the employee and the subject area assigned for the 2016-2017 school year. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing allows Districts to apply for Short Term Staff Permits to fill an acute staffing need by hiring an individual who has not yet met the subject matter competence requirement needed to enter an internship program. The district has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. This permit will allow Nina Willis to work as a Special Education Teacher while she completes the subject matter competence requirement.

Summary: Nina Willis Weston Ranch High School Special Education Teacher

Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of employment of the above employee and assignment for the 2016-2017 school year.

Approvals: Bonnie Bennett — Director of Certificated Personnel


CS?

Phone209(3 858-0794 Fax ((209-825-3238

bbennett a muscl.net

P.O. Box 32, Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95336 vVW%V. mantccausd.net


Agenda Item


Item Number: 10


TITLE: Approve Single Subject Waiver

Background/ Rationale: The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing allows districts to apply for Waiver to fill acute staffing needs by hiring individuals as teachers and substitutes who have not yet met the subject matter competence requirements needed to clear out-of-state credentials. The District has completed a diligent search for suitable credentialed teachers or qualified intern teachers. This Waiver allows holders to work while completing subject matter competence requirements. Specifically, this will allow Ms. Armstrong to fulfill the basic skills requirement set by the CTC to renew her single subject credential.

• Armstrong, Megan — Home Economics Teacher, Lathrop High School

Funding Source: N/A


Presentation: Z No n Yes (attached) El Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.


2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Boca(' lova',

Phone (209) 858-0794 Fax (209_825-3238

bbennett amuscl.net

P.O. Box 32, Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95336 W W W mantecatiscl.net

French Camp Lathrop Manteca Weston Ranc Manteca Unified School District

Bonnie Bennett., Director II:• Certificated Personnel Services

Meeting Date: April 18, 2017


Type: Single Subject Waiver and Approval

Subject: The Board of Education will consider a Waiver for a Single Subject Teacher

File Attachment: The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing requires Board of Education approval to assign certificated personnel on a Single Subject Waiver. The request for a Waiver states that the District has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. Below is the name of the employee and the subject area assigned for the 2016-2017 school year. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing allows Districts to apply for Single Subjects Waivers to fill an immediate staffing need by hiring an individual who has not yet met the subject matter competence requirement needed to enter an internship program. The district has completed a diligent search for a suitable credentialed teacher or qualified intern teacher. This waiver will allow Megan Armstrong to work as a Single Subject Teacher while she completes the subject matter competence requirement.

Summary:

Recommendation:

Approvals:

Megan Armstrong Lathrop High School Single Subject Teacher

Staff recommends approval of employment of the above employee and assignment for the 2016-2017 school year.

Bonnie Bennett — Director of Certificated Personnel


Cc7


Agenda Item


Item Number: 11

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Operational Services

TITLE: Adopt Resolution 16/17-72, Certifying the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Nile Garden School Water Project for the Manteca Unified School District

Background/ Rationale: Certifying the Initial Study / Mitigation Negative Declaration will complete the final stage of the planning phase for the Nile Garden School Water Project.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Staff Recommends your approval.

Presentation: No

n Yes (attached) 11 Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved By: Facilities Department Clark Burke, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent

2271 Wes/ Louise Aye., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oard

CONSENT ITEM:


OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION NO. 16/17-72

CERTIFYING THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE NILE GARDEN SCHOOL WATER PROJECT FOR THE MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA"), the Board of Trustees ("Board") of the Manteca Unified School District ("District") duly caused to be prepared the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Nile Garden School Water Project ("Project") and

WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was made available for public review and comment in conformance with CEQA and State CEQA Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the District and the Lead Agency under CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, the District caused the preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration in conformance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is subject to certification by the Board and prior to certification the Board is required to make certain findings required under Public Resources Code Section 21151.8 and Education Code Section 17213; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted for the Nile Garden School Water Project on April 18, 2017, the purpose of which was to consider the certification of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and to comply with Education Code Section 17211, which requires that the Board of Trustees evaluate real property proposed for acquisition prior to its acquisition.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Adoption of Recitals. The Board adopts the foregoing recitals as true and correct.

SECTION 2. Findings Regarding Hazardous Emissions or Hazardous Waste and/or Materials Required by Section 21151.8 of the Public Resources Code and Section 17213 of the Education Code. The Board finds, based upon information contained within the Negative Declaration that the Project site is not currently or formerly a hazardous or solid waste release site, and does not contain any underground or above ground pipelines which carry hazardous substances, acutely hazardous materials, or hazardous wastes. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District has determined no facilities were found within one-fourth mile of the Manteca High School Expansion site which might reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste.

Res. No. 16/17-72 Consent Item:

CONSENT ITEM:

SECTION 3. Certification of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Board certifies as follows:

(a) The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines;

(b) The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Board and the Board has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Negative Declaration Report prior to approving the project; and

(c) The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the District.

SECTION 4. Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Reporting Program. The Board hereby incorporates into the Project all mitigation measures set forth in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves and authorizes the implementation of the Mitigation Reporting Program set forth in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

SECTION 5. Project Findings. The Board hereby makes the findings required by Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 2017, by the following vote of the Board of Education of the Manteca Unified School District of the County of San Joaquin, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

STEPHEN J SCHLUER, PRESIDENT Board of Education Manteca Unified School District San Joaquin County, California

EVELYN MOORE, CLERK Board of Education Manteca Unified School District San Joaquin County, California

Res. No. 16/17-72

Consent Item: _ 2


Agenda Item


Item Number: 12


TITLE: Approve Certification That All Temporary Athletic Team Coaches Have the Provisions of Title 5 California Code Regulations 5593 and 5594

Background/ Rationale: Tide 5 requires that the Board certify that all temporary athletic team coaches meet the requirements of Section 5593 and 5594. Section 5594 basically states that coaches must have the qualifications and competencies to deal with athletic injuries, emergency procedures relating to injuries, and coaching techniques and theories related to the sport for which they are coaching. The District has a program in place to certify that coaches have met these requirements.

Funding Source: N/A


Presentation: Z No

1-1Yes (attached) flYes. Presented at the Board meeting.


MIF

2271 Vest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oan1

French Camp Lathrop tianteca Weston Rana Manteca Unified School District

CERTIFICATION 2016-2017 Temporary Athletic Team Coaches

TO STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION:

Title 5, California Code of Regulations, Section 5594, requires:

By April 1 of each year, each local governing school board shall certify to the State Board of Education that the provisions of Section 5593 have been met.

LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD CERTIFICATION:

I hereby certify the school district has met the conditions set forth in Title 5, Sections 5593 and 5594.

April 18, 2017 Stephen J. Schuler Board President Manteca Unified School District

P.O. Box 32 Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337

Phone (209) 825-3200 Fax (209) 825-3238

~cww.mantccausd.net

View Document - California Code of Regulations Page 1 of 2

VVestt2vvNext California Code of Regulations

Home Table of Contents

§ 5593. Temporary Athletic Team Coach Qualifications and Competencies. 5 CA ADC § 5593

BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS

Barclays Official California Code of Regulations Currentness Title 5 . Education

Division 1. California Department of Education Chapter 6. Certified Personnel

Subchapter 2. Duties of Certificated and Noncertificated Personnel Article 5. Duties of Temporary Athletic Team Coaches

5 CCR § 5593

§ 5593• Temporary Athletic Team Coach Qualifications and Competencies.

This section applies to any person serving at any grade level as a temporary athletic team coach.

(a) The district shall determine whether a temporary athletic team coach is knowledgeable and competent in the areas ot.

(1) Care and prevention of athletic injuries, basic first aid and emergency procedures;

(2) Coaching techniques;

(3) Rules and regulations in the athletic activity being coached; and

(4) Child or adolescent psychology, whichever is appropriate to the grade level of the involved sports activity.

(b) The district shall establish a temporary athletic team coach's qualifications in each of the below specified four competency areas.

(1) Care and prevention of athletic injuries, basic sports Injury first aid, and emergency procedures as evidenced by one or more of the following;

(A) Completion of a college-level course in the care and prevention of athletic injuries and possession of a valid cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) card; or

(B) A valid sports injury certificate or first aid card, and a valid cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR card; or

(C) A valid Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) I or II card; or

(0) A valid trainer's certification issued by the National or California Athletic Trainers' Association (NATAICATA); or

(E) The person has had practical experience under the supervision of an athletic coach or trainer, or has assisted in team athletic training and conditioning, and has both valid CPR and first aid cards.

(2) Coaching theory and techniques in the sport or game being coached, as evidenced by one or more of the following:

(A) Completion of a college course in coaching theory and techniques; or

(B) Completion of in-service programs arranged by a school district or a county office of education; or

(C) Prior service as a student coach or assistant athletic coach in the sport or game being coached; or

(0) Prior coaching in community youth athletic programs in the sport to be coached; or

(E) Prior participation in organized competitive athletics at high school level or above in the sport to be coached.

(3) Knowledge of the rules and regulations pertaining to the sport or game being coached, the league rules and, at the high school level, regulations of the CIF.

(4) Knowledge of child or adolescent psychology as it relates to sports participation as evidenced by one or more of the following:

(A) Completion of a college-level course in child psychology for elementary school poiitions and adolescent or sports psychology for secondary school positions; or

(B) Completion of a seminar or workshop on human growth and development of youth; or

haps://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/194B8AECOD47F11DEBCO2831C6D6C108E?... 4/9/2015


(C) Prior active involvement with youth in a school or community sports program.

(c) The school district superintendent may waive compliance with any one or more of the competencies described in subsection (a) provided that the person is enrolled in a program leading to acquisition of a competency. Until the competencies are met, the prospective coach shall serve under the immediate supervision of a fully qualified temporary athletic team coach.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 33031 and 35179.5, Education Code. Reference: Sections 33352 and 35179.5, Education Code.

HISTORY

1. New section filed 11-2-88; operative 12-2-88 (Register 88, No. 46).

This database is current through 3/27/15 Register 2015, No. 13

5 CCR § 5593, 5 CA ADC § 5593

END DF DOCUMENT 02015 Thomson Reuters. No clan, to ergots; U.S Government Works

2015 Thomson %tours

https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/194B8AECOD47F11DEBCO2831C6D6C108E?... 4/9/2015


WesttawNext California Code of Regulations

Home Table of Contents

§ 6694. Local Board Certification of Athletic Coaches. 5 CA ADC § 5594

BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Barclays Official California Code of Regulations Currentness

Title 5. Education Division 1. California Department of Education

Chapter 6. Certified Personnel Subchapter z. Duties of Certificated and Noncertificated Personnel

Article 5. Duties of Temporary Athletic Team Coaches

5 CCR § 5594

§ 5594. Local Board Certification of Athletic Coaches.

At the first regular board meeting or within 30 days after selection of a temporary athletic team coach, whichever is sooner, the district superintendent shall certify to the local board of trustees that the provisions in section 5593 have been met. The board shall, by April 1 of each year, certify to the State Board of Education that the provisions of section 5593 have been met. Said certification form shall be prescribed by the California Department of Education.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 33031 and 35179.5, Education Code. Reference: Section 35179.5, Education Code.

HISTORY

1. New section filed 11-2-88; operative 12-2-88 (Register 88, No. 48).

2. Change without regulatory effect amending section and Note filed 12-23-2010 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2010, No. 52).

This database is current through 3/27/15 Register 2015, No. 13

5 CCR § 5594, 5 CA ADC § 5594

END OF DOCUMENT 0 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S Government Works.

0 2015 Thomson Reuters

haps ://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/IAA49AE00152A11E0A2F5DB994EF04530?... 4/9/2015


Agenda Item

Department: Business Services Type: Consent Item

Item Number: 13

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Business Services

TITLE: Authorization to Dispose of Obsolete I ,quipment and Materials — 3rd Quarter 2017

Background/ Rationale:

The District has accumulated an inventory of equipment and materials that are no longer of use to the District and/or may be in non-working condition. Under current Board Policy No. 3260, the District may dispose of equipment and materials, which have been declared obsolete by the Board of Education.

Funding Source: N/A


Presentation: Z No ❑ Yes (attached) ❑ Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved By: Business Services Department

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oaryl 4endas

FOR DISTRICT OFFICE USE ONLY

Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P1

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

SURPLUS PROPERTY FORM

1. If more than one item is to be removed, please type "see attached list" on the item description line below and complete the Surplus Attachment list.

2. Site Administrator/Supervisor signature and date is required to process this request. 3. List the site/department where the item is currently located. 4. Describe in detail (i.e. oak, 4 shelf bookcase or appropriate description). 5. Indicate Serial Number and District ID # (if applicable). 6. Check the condition of the item and list the reason for surplus. 7. Item should remain at the site until Purchasing has scheduled the pick-up.

Requested by: Jean Sorich

Authorized by: Rupi Bhatti

Site: D.O./Child Welfare & Attendance

Serial #: See Attached (If applicable)

Date: 1/09/2017

Date: H2-2011

Item Desc: See Attached

District ID #: See Attached

Reason for Surplus: Working (detail):

Not working (detail):

Technology Items no lonzer me tiitg District standard system requirements. Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.

Purchasing\Surplus\Auction.wpd Rev. 03/11

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SURPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site: D.O. / Child Welfare & Attendant

PL SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FO WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DISTRICT DECAL #

CONDITION (W/NW)

Computer Tower Optiplex 740 3843042517 DISEDS040 W

Computer Monitor ViewSonic VG930M-3 QC2070203045 114673 W

Computer Monitor ViewSonic VG930M-3 QC2070203831 n/a W

Computer Monitor ViewSonic VG930M-3 QC2070202673 105823 W

Computer Monitor Dell LCD Monitor E198WFPf 3H5S-A01 92370 W

Computer Monitor Dell LCD Monitor El 98WFPf 43VS-A01 114672 W

(Must be ubmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P3





Requested by: Nathalie Guerrero

Authorized by: C9a, eeaAA

Site: IT Dept./Server Room

Serial #: (If applicable)

Date: 3/31/17

Date:

Item Desc: "See attached list"

District ID #:


x Not working (detail): Items are not in working condition.

Technology Ik,ms no longcr illecting_Dis rift standard system iequilement. Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.


Location/Site: IT De t/Server Room

PL COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM F


SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DEL SERIAL # DISTRICT DECAL #

CONDITION (W/NW)

Computer Optiplex 740 1RK5QLI N/A NW

Computer Optiplex 740 GDWJHH1 102128 NW

Wireless Access Point HP-MSM422 Access Point J9358B 107149 NW

Surface Pro 2 Microsoft, 128GB 2600634253 61000000052080 NW







Surface Pro 2 M 128GB Microsoft, 25273240853 61000000052882 NW


Server Dell Poweredge 2950 55J6MB1 102274 NW

Server xacqVision Model IPS-6000-R2 18449477120 N/A NW

Surface RT2 Microsoft, 32GB 11826340252 N/A NW

(Must b submitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

Location/Site: IT Dept/Server Room

.

SURPLUS MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) RKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

I DISTRICT CONDITION MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DECAL # (W/NW)

PLEASE COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FORW

DESCRIPTION

Surface 3 Microsoft, 64GB .181452452 61000000094561 NW

Surface 3 Vlicrosoft, 64GB 67152452 61000000093746 NW



Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P6





Requested by: SUNNY S. SNGH (DST) Date: 02 09 ( 2017-

Authorized by: 06111L-yet.-(...A_ Date: /

Site: P\UetUST K-NbUT et-e-MENTARY Item Desc: SEE P\ a/K.1-WD LIST

Serial #: District ID #: (If appl cable)


PNot working (detail): THESE ITEMS ARE &Hey MISS/1\6' esseo-i/AL. 'PARTS NeeDeD To operPITE -TITEY c_6(ApueTEL•f toN'T DON'T HAVE TKEIR PuECHAEE iniF3E/ARTioN BUT 1-Ps SPA Fe To SAY Twe1 /47" I-41Ve KANE])

eqb of TF Ufe CYCLE.

Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.


1 T Lon - - - D. 2e' t -d el • Tcclino o tern ky s no gc,i. wie_etmg L S SyS re tnreuielL s. q

SERIAL # DISTRICT DECAL #

CONDITION (W/NW) DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT URPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

UST Ict\IMI- et\Wy (00(\.4 20) Location/Site:

PLE SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DESKTOP -PC DELL OFFTLEX Gix620 H 2 DV/ Z.1 I 610581 KM/ DESKTOP 1Dc DELL op-nPLex x G20 53 D \ATE 9 I MISSING NM DESKTOP 'pc DELL opTiptFx X622 13 DWG ci I M ISSING Niel StiNER FACE, DC DESKTO siLVER FACE Dc 16(73093-700052 9 2-Lf5L,0" Nw siLAiu. FACE DC DESKTOP SILVER FACE -DC 16( -106i60`,0086 MISS(N NIA/

NEC VT5cf 5 8201835EJ cr25g6 NW PROJECTOR (\NH (TE) pRojecroK (WHITE) NEc v1595 g3009-95EJ 92q30 KM

PROJECTOR (M-In-E) NEC VT595 g300801E3 921+'8 f\iv) PROJECTOR CWHITE) NEC \i-T595 8OO'372EJ 921-1-Z2 N\Ai

mcmictoR \18113E3 \itEWsomc V61-7-301\4-3 QBY07-062.8079 m(sstoGI r)W MaNIFoR \IS (1323 VIE- SoNic \17-30M-3 QBY(63-102-0- 36 MissiN NW moNI-KDR sTAND DELL coltAVAPIN263 N/A W NIoNITog STRND DELL Firal°31P/M.gt3VPI Ni/A (A)

bmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

02/0 7/2_017-

(Must be


CONDITION tW/NW) DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL

(Must be S hmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Location/Site: August Knodt

PLEA E TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

Electric Eraser Cleaner Little Giant/ Weber Costello D23814 16736 W

Projector Cart Luxor none none W

Filing Cabinet Hon none 53679 W

Refrigerator HotPoint CTXI4CYTGRAD 57675 W

_ .

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT .11:1PLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site: August Knodt

PLEA TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT

CONDITION DESCRIPTION

MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

(W/NW)

Printer Hewlett Packard/C7044A CNDX002159 76328 NW

Filing Cabinet Luxor none 51425 NW

Laminator Laminex Minikote/27"Minikote G2 0631-3156 none NW

(Must be

omitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

Requested by: illey Date: 2/27/2017

Authorized by:

Site: George Mc Parlan

Serial #: see attached (If applicable)

Date:

Item Desc:

District ID #: see attached

.-( 3 -77

see attached



Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:


SURPLITS PROPERTY FORM

1. If more than one item is to be removed, please type "see attached list" on the item description line below and com1ete the Surplus Attachment list.

2. Site Administrator/Supervisor siOnature and date is required to process this request. 3. List the site/department where tl* item is currently located. 4. Describe in detail (i.e. oak, 4 sheif bookcase or appropriate description). 5. Indicate Serial Number and Disti)ct ID # (if applicable). 6. Check the condition of the itemund list the reason for surplus. 7. Item should remain at the site until Purchasing has scheduled the pick-up.


eLtditilugy—litundongerimetingaistri_ctsta,nciarcs1 Auirements. Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repidrs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.


aste

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SU i,'LUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site:

George McParland

COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKIN , NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned)

DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL SERIAL #

DISTRICT DECAL #

CONDITION (W/NW)

0 e.ector ,EC-NP115 projector

, , IC NP115

013,02300ef 0801193ef

n/a n/a

nw nw

projector NEC NP115 0801198ef n/a nw projector NEC NP115 0800646ef n/a nw projector NEC NP115 0801254wf n/a nw projector NEC NP115 0801216ef n/a nw projector NEC NP115 0800658ef n/a nw projector l`tIEC NP115 0801217ef n/a nw projector epSon S7 m3vf0219711 n/a nw projector epson S7 m3vf0147181 n/a nw printer brother DCP 808n n/a nw

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SU; PLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

N N-WORKING ITEMS - obsolete

COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKIN , NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

Location/Site:

George McParland

PLEASE TY' E OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned)

MAKE/MODEL SERIAL #

DISTRICT

DECAL #

CONDITION

(W/NW)

Desick i t ,com cater' , DeLQ Pti * ,ex, A80 ,,,FSC7CP1 missin• nw Desk top computer LG 16171002000223 106905 nw

Desk top computer LG 16176002000206 106904 nw


Desk top computer P 16173002000284 106908 nw



Desk top computer De,I Optiplex 580 B095WR1 106049 nw



Desk top computer De'l Optiplex 580 20G9KS1 106050 nw

Desk top computer De,I Optiplex 7010 6DV5ZV1 missing nw

Desk top computer De) Optiplex 580 h38mns1 106948



Desk top computer I_G 16176002000257 106907 nw

Laptop p_e I D11ZBG1 99891 nw

Laptop Dell 411ZBG1 99893 nw Laptop Dell 1K2ZG31 84013 nw Laptop Dell 50V4LV1 109980 nw surface pro 2 microsoft 61000000052270 n/a nw printer ep son cv6e114117 72887 nw

(Must be submitte as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P 1 4





Requested by: e 106 ACkaliCk A" ek Date: //f2 7/(/

0-Lde72`7-

Date: 3 bq47

Authorized by:

Site: ilAr Ar fa 1 Item Desc:

Serial #: District ID #:

(If applicable)



Technology Items no longer meeting District standard system requirements. Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.

P15

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Roo". 411,1 SURPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site: MC

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL#

-;-=(, ... ', ; -re' .., cSc a. nner 1-1F1,%tnyt 51-190cSG15e1110a. 1 Log93 kJ Coapuktr WI /tom 740 I vtkl.5 e4 I " Pe'l tA) Compte-er Dell krupbc 'NO 12._v 2. IC 1 Oci99 CY] LO

CO Ai pbt-t-e_r Ze li lorti-ver 7q0 zesio-- ( 099E406 W r_o(vi pfrf-er Oelt lopt-lpfekitIO Pz‘12 i F I to it) 0 655- Co A4- Otter ne-ii /op-qp( 7116 142.\12 1 F I Oct9c, o2 Li) (Om 1(1?-1-pr Dell /0p4-/ple.K 790 0 YV 2_1 F 1 100657 U Co AA ptiter 0 edi/optipiex -No c-7954- IF i 100658 kAi cr5ivi purer Dell hp-I-IpleX -No 4Z-V2.1 F I 099909 \n/ Co Al pc, 1-er Deli /opt-ipiex 740 BY‘t 24 n vier/03 vu C_a AA pt.,-t--er ()ell 101'11' kK Vto t-\ 1... N 8 CG I no dual Co AA (NA :re r L'iei tic) pIex 71./6 137-q2 IF I 0 ciciqo 4 vv c--(3 /1-1 pLcter- be-100 it-tie-K7 /6 97-1̀02ic i lumps i w

(Must be submitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

lac Clcm,..9k,L

3zv2-1 Fl I o0652- vv j-TY Ntlif OD IDS+ W

r: l'VC't M MAL) s\ (al 67

\ )

ek-e0e Ack-c \10 93 E .06S bg LI (09 1,6

-1568 (1,.)

1 1

r't 0 3 t, 7. 1 5./ b

kk 1S0.3 ‘13

rl

524 5 5r1}31,0 190(01 VV

P16


Oonk:4

Location/Site: • • td1 cl7A 12. R

and Anne -/c.

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL

DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

(W/NVA

Primer Ye,rox/ ?has& b130 14A-To3(9093 99807 1.1/4‘) rQiik) Pr tr- v-ex Ye rox APhaser (012D Y Ge22151-7 ()toil

RI nt--er Xertr-i. /Phaser bt2o 1 (rG 22-2 5(0 980 12 KJAJ Pri'nfer xemx /Phaser to ao Y Ga22-15 t s 9So 1 NV() Prily\TS )4e Tx /FhttSenot2v Meta 222,2A+ 'I So 1 (3. 1.i /vi RI r\ 1-er Xerox /171-laser (ptW KGs 2l-15l$ 9E3014- oitAi Pr Ini-er el3sc0/9-111,us 0,S2. eLVE 2AD101 2v13`7 [14

COR/ Machoe Toshi e6i-uchb Z5 CPC115(06-7 7917(0 LW) ueit ppfipkivx 740 L'IVZI'F) 0 991 i o is Au aysp-A,5747mul-ex

id-ef De 1140•0 pkoA 140 fyvzi F I 6911 DS i•J/W

Pr l'A-i-eiN 14P a-s<7-er C"i9,3t1 A -Nil-0- /1)/u.


Requested by:

Authorized by.

Date:

Date:

Item Desc:

District ID #:

27D

Site:

Serial #: 0)6, vetc (

)31


Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P 1 7




2. Site Administrator/Supervisor signature and date is required to process this request. 3. List the site/department where the item is currently located. 4. Describe in detail (ie. oak, 4 shelf bookcase or appropriate description). 5. Indicate Serial Number and District ID # (if applicable). 6. Check the condition of the item and list the reason for surplus. 7. Item should remain at the site until Purchasing has scheduled the pick-up.

(If applicable)


zr Not working (detail):


Location/Site:


CONDITION Mr/NW) DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL

(Must be su mitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

, MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT iRPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

P_XY1 ef-- ceA..bui

PLEAS PE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR W4 KING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

IA 4e. li -- 1

+II) be5k. te-f-3 4/0 C. C/NB3f 7 0 D 6 .-7(iv` 1Ni

-Pci 11--h:.- — b(11 1.,45( iT 17ct r) 6(p Icis I ..-7349.3 N

iV. 1 t1 P Cry. f -Ki- i'2,65r;411.e.KRazot-t-z-9367 7(3V7 Ai Kil

P(cief2,toy/- 'tQiEc, vr--r5ci .--Tirtz. i 3a ED "7 Net (D. NIA) N)EQ.., VT 5ci5 154-13 1-------b '7341693 1\)14 i(1-6, e c.,11Ar-

- f L,, V(:17.;\( AEC, N-P i 15 C-136 i -!)- z-3 EF 7&15.S N (A)

17 Culcc. lbs(-- KE.C® N-P115 on)/1 "7g -F -7 6457 (V lAi

(4-V111-1: t ..r k I,--c-.. --Phka- t- ''c.:,....4,-0 F-7-E i ' 1,.5 22, 7 0 q3 (A)

Date:

Date:

Item Desc:

District ID #:

OLVYRdor

Requested by:

Authorized by:

rvito f~tti if Site:

Serial #:


Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P 1 9





Reason for Surplus:

(If applicable)

Working (detail):


hnolo_gy±tems no longer mecting_District standard vstem rbqturemtmts. Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.



ri

Location/Site:

PLE • SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W/NW)

Dp-H -7 1-iD cDnipc,t4-er L-)e_l I yoeriooko 1e)-742q N W Ork,i -7 Li 6 con() Nom' t:Dil 1 L ),) 0 asp c DS 1, 7 N W 0 -No roryipt,L-t- pei I gortY& I ccqqs- N V 01 1 LID roryipu-fri Deli j yr -001 I 00-3q 40 N \TV C,)1 -NO rompc-i -ici, .eti hyr:)-09I 100'13 N \A./

op-h, -1L-10 corrieu-ir 1--)e il 5-v r aDol I DOLIDLI K oil

4t -140 Cc./Iloct,t tp-e4 I ‘ifraci I I CO (log N ilv opil -7 110 Campa-f-cp-- . Dell ii-Wzr7t211 10 0 ctig 1̀ ) vii Doi -No Calipt,t-teK De 0 I Yr e:D 1 itYAS7 Ni w

CO'h 140 r_orYcu-1- tt-eti I ir• 'Co I lot) LIIK) N w OM •11eD canpu 1 pti ( iaidoc T- I 100 Lici5- N w oc)-ki 1 qo cOmpLE L Peil Giql riPi 1o0So0 NW cvki --Igo mnpai . pe( I dzy gi4Q ( op SOY iJ w 1)041 1 if o rAynoid16. Di ti 9bcwil---1 MO CIS' N ‘Jv



Location/Site:

11 I Gri.

PLE SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W/NW)

07F,1 -ND romptt- D-r.,11 Se9dz-c-1 100 S2f5 I\rvu 091-i -1qb compti-to -p'(1 c bSciz-Pi fp° s2c? N N

(-cmpu-l-ex ' 1.)11 -c -7 ci-zpi 100 -s3f Nvt)

p~/LIO

7110 compu-kyn dell cictqcfs;-1 1.11t55P- N IN) vh. 7t-i0 compu ' ()di 13SciT, -1 IDOS.& N W cob TC0 CoMpu40' Drii cI .707.-E1 IDOS3tt iv W, 0911 7110 conpu- fuel Deb h 211 clz-C--i toCtS3 5" kJ w CP 140 com 11-c„K- 1 De,f1 I cloPizA itts3 I NO a) -Iii -ND compu-kV'Dell coed -z,-C-I 10bC(i3 Nvo

-ND can u ' c>eli IDOgq0 Nw T -to coryip tt -t. , Pet!

3cict-z.C.-1 lc' ciz,p-i 1005q1 Nvi ,

0,0 'VD Compuler--7 Dell l' ci-z-P-1 11)050- N wi r),,ii -No compu,ic,)'- `well ST cilA ) DO 51-15 N W OD -h 7(40 liOivai. ID-Ci I -INCI -z_f-1 100 9-141 N Wi



Location/Site:

PL SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

(W/NW)

Or -741) Catn 1)611 aic6c17-2-1 100915- N vi bch Tip onipu-fry ' ID-ell 34gdz,C--1 ionslfs N vvl DO-, -NO comptkic dell .3b9d-if -I loOsqq Nyv opip_ -NO coni)u-b , D-ell Lieiyiz4-1 toosso N W

4-11 - NO arylptrity ')et I -769pli-n i Oossa-, ki w I40 rOmDuk/ Dell carl7ttue)-1 ISqL'i 1\1 \iv

phi -N17 fOr11)111riv bell T-bg (- I qo' I I oici-73 --ILID cbnipbt--

N wH ocil - Li .)(1"-ibil 1D(ob6b Ni 'Al

COO ')(-11) Ornpu- D-e(( h9,njns I 1013 N uk) Lvh., -No co m pu Del h3 ILI ns I 1'061111

Lio Compu N w

-7 Deli i-Iihnsi too LiLf NW --)10 (OitY/ U-1-6 DC il 3x,r ?1±4.1 10B 7D 3, N \N.)

Oph -KID Complyi- ill Xr 7 1007DY N ik) ash. 140 rOrinpu.-/-6' 1 \ir ct‘ I I L*70 N-W

(Must be = ubmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Location/Site: f /VT Ca NALL

COMPLETE A

DESCRIPTION

PLEASE SEPARATE FORM FOR

TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT CONDITION

MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DECAL # (W/NW)

IDIVH —1140 C DM U IPC1I grow S,C, I I be 7 it N W -7 0 CI) ,DLI . Deli fNfr 34)51 IDQ)77 N 0 l'LD carpub DO i w roi!Pi) i Ibt) Liol 14 A(

t 11[o CalVti- fr Del 1 ,x1-?c rn 3 1 Dok-igts--- N W

1,1 4


r P24

1.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

If more than one description line Site Administrator/Supervisor



item is to be removed, please type "see attached list" on the item below and complete the Surplus Attachment list.

signature and date is required to process this request. where the item is currently located.

(i.e. oak, 4 shelf bookcase or appropriate description). and District ID # (if applicable).

of the item and list the reason for surplus. at the site until Purchasing has scheduled the pick-up.

List the site/department Describe in detail Indicate Serial Number Check the condition Item should remain

=

Requested

Authorized

Site:

Serial #:

Reason

by: 11 /4-A; , / 40 Date: D /a-1 / 17

by: Date: 24Zb(i7

Nik,ft-t-co, \--kgtA Item Desc:

6e2 ctiLtaa_ci District ID #:

for Surplus:

(Ifappicable)

Working (detail):




Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

4TECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIS RICT IS PROPERTY LISTING (ATT HMENT)

pg 1 N/W Location/Site: Manteca High School

PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot b- read will be returned) NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS, A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DESCRIPTION

MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW)

NEC projector VT590 6Y00431FB 97707 N/W

NEC projector VT595 7602383FG 97738 N/W

lnfocus Projector IN1501 BDQM04901065 106616 N/W

Dell Projector 2300MP CNOG5371S00816340176 93667 N/W

us Property Form) tted as an attachment to the Surpl

Location/Site: Manteca High School

NTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DI RICT JS PROPERTY LISTING (ATT CHMENT)

SERIAL #

PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot b read will be returned) I, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

MAKE/MODEL

pg 2 N/W

DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW)

Dell monitor e173fp od542872872589f1v1 93579 N/W

Dell monitor e173fp od542872872589fm9I 93580 NM/

Dell monitor e173fp ofj1816418065u2mss 97594 NM/

Dell monitor e173fp ofj1816418065t1365 97596 N/W

Dell monitor , e173fp ofj1816418065u3075 97598 N/W

Dell monitor e173fp ofj1816418065u3065 97592 N/W

Dell monitor e173fp ofj1816418065t17cs 97604 N/W

Dell monitor vs11147 qya071451019 97731 N/W

Dell monitor M783s MX0X37824760551AB2N9 88514 N/W

itted as an attachment to the Surpl us Property Form)

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT S !RPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)


PLEASE COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR

YPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

SERIAL # DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW)

Flip Video recorder Ultra HD MW0931308659 106644 N/W



Nikon Digital Camera L820 30206029 103089 N/W




MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site: Manteca High School pg 4 N/W

PLEASE YPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT CONDITION

DESCRIPTION

MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL # (W/NW)

Apollo Overhead projector V3000 12040133068 88550 N/W

Apollo Overhead projector 3000 9050098706 95795 N/W

Dukane Overhead Projector 28A622A 1969491 61417 N/W

Dukane Magnaview projector 28A200C 13191 30955 N/W

Kodak Ektograph Projector N/A A-263978 25339 N/W

Pioneer Laser Disc player CLD-V2400 3944664 48273 N/W

(Must be sub tted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL DISTRICT CONDITION

SERIAL # DECAL # (W/NW)

(Must be su mitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT S RPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)

Location/Site: Manteca Hi .h School

PLEASE, ypE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned)

pg 5 N/W

Xerox printer 4500 pmt272132 93585 N/W

HP printer 5850 C8975A 85890 N/W

Epson deskjet printer 740 A6R1249502 63871 N/W

Sharp Scanner Copier AL-1631 55104902 88574 N/W

HP laserjet printer 5100 N/A 88572 NM/

Fridgedare Elite Refrigerator FPEm18F 171846-56 39982 N/W

Montgomery Ward Refrigerator HMG 19864 BM-7C72A N/A N/W


Location/Site: Manteca High School pg 6 N/W




Dell computer 740 8ZG46K1 101394 N/W

Dell computer 740 9LMHBGI 100776 N/W

Dell computer 740 G5FY3G1 100110 N/W

Dell computer 740 7LMHBGI 100774 N/W

Dell computer 740 1XG11F1 99599 N/W

Dell computer 740 FLMHBGI 100772 N/W

Dell computer 740 DXG11F1 N/A N/W

Dell computer GX620 dipkkbi 97601 N/W

Dell computer GX620 7zpkkbi 97599 NM/

Dell computer GX620 d2pkkbi 97595 N/W

Dell computer GX620 1zpkkbi 57591 NM!

Dell computer GX620 fOpkkbi 97597 NM!

Dell computer 740 dk32hf1 99673 NM/

Dell computer 740 jk32hf1 99679 NM/





DESCRIPTION


Dell Laptop Latitude D610 55N2T91 93666 NM/

IBM thinkpad laptop Lenovo T60 L33N3E2 96974 N/W

Apple laptop M6411 UV10115HJO6 70555 N/W

1

(Must be su

mitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Location/Site: Manteca High School pg 8 NA/V



DESCRIPTION DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW) SERIAL # MAKE/MODEL

Refrigerator N/A N/A 39982 N/W

GE Microwave N/A N/A 55473 N/W

Sanyo TV DS35510 V1290557259484 76818 N/W

GE Dishwasher N/A N/A N/A N/W

RCA TV F27625 946636229 68564 N/W

Quasar TV VV2705 SB60320528 55294 N/W

Zenith TV Z32H41D 721-62450096 N/A N/W

RCA TV F25655BC 827212117 63876 N/W

Sanyo TV DS31590 V1350559497475 77683 N/W

Sharp TV 25RT59 561945 41701 N/W

Sony TV , KV27T320 7582949 46781 N/W

Gateway Destination TV DL-27-1 3375 N/A N/W

Sanyo TV DS-35510 V1290557259620 76918 N/W

Zenith TV E5220W 922-15030420 N/A N/W

(Must be sub mitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW) MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DESCRIPTION

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)



ONE Sixty Microscope N/A N/A 07061 N/W








Swift Stero Eighty Microscope N/A N/A 21191 N/W

Black and Gold Microscope N/A N/A 0424 N/W

Forty Microscope N/A N/A 05923 N/W


Forty Microscope N/A N/A 05924 NM/



MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SPRPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)


PLEASE T COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR W


DISTRICT CONDITION DECAL # (W/NW) SERIAL # DESCRIPTION MAKE/MODEL

One Sixty Microscope N/A N/A 09905 N/W


Black and Gold Microscope N/A N/A 0423 NM/

Parco Microscope N/A N/A 41746 N/W

Pulnix N/A N/A 41731 N/W

(Must be sub, itted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Location/Site: Manteca Hi .h School

PLEA. E TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W/NW)

Sharp TV 25A-M1008 704829 46333 N/W

Sharp VCR VC-A503U 305817758 N/Wil 46374

Xerox Phaser Printer 6120 ygg221856 97693 N/W

HP Laser printer 1 P4014 CNDX807148 106788 N/W

HP Laser printer P2055 CNB9715931 105744 N/W

HP deskjet printer 6540 C8963A 91947 N/W

Dell Monitor E173FPc CNOU4931466335480K9S 93388 N/W


pg 1


Auction: Surplus:

Transferred to:

P36





Requested by: &Irnikr\ita ti 6 n

Authorized by:

Site: t&Zift (j\r‘

Serial #:

Date:

Date:

Item Desc:

District ID #:

32717

(If applicable)

Reason for Surplus: Working (detail): 6A-Vaio4

Fr Not working (detail): y-,<, 6ovA


Location/Site: Room 72/Sierra Hi .h


PLE'• SE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FO WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W/NW)

Dell GX740 computer Optiplex 740 7RF7NF1 72036 NW

Dell GX740 computer Optiplex 740 5B04FH1 104431 NW

Dell GX740 computer Optiplex 740 8TG11F1 105900 NW

Dell GX620 computer Optiplex 620 G7J7Z81 N/A NW

Wyse thin client VXO 6WDD1600228 N/A NW

HP thin client t510/SRP US MXL41411940 N/A NW

HP thin client t510/SRP US MXL4270T75 N/A NW


Location/Site: Room 72/Sierra High



OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT CONDITION MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DECAL # (W/NW)

TYPE COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR

DESCRIPTION

PLEASE I

WORKING,

Dell monitor E198FPf CN-OCNO78-72872-7CA-OCGH N/A NW

i






DISTRICT CONDITION MAKE/MODEL SERIAL # DECAL # (W!NW)

TYPE PLEASE COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR

DESCRIPTION

WORKING,

laptop, IBM Thinkpad T60 200752U 102921 NW

iii

(Must be Submitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)






TYPE PLEASE COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR

DESCRIPTION

WORKING,

HP projector SB21 TW24000115 82282 NW

,




PLEA. E TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

(W/NW)

Smart Board SB580 51692 79564 W

Smart Board floor stand FS570 N/A 79565 W

Smart Board SB1060B LAP3177G31 104446 W




PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W/NW)

scanner, Fuji document Fuji 6130 130754 104447 NW

ELMO document camera , TT-02s 501359 98991 NW

Yamaha electric piano YPP-50 039467 62086 NW


Yamaha electricpiano p YPP-50 039496 62085 NW




Yamaha electric piano i l YPP-50 608959 82213 NW

(Must bel ubmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

Location/Site: Room 72/Sierra


PLEA E TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FORI ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.

DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

(W/NW)

File cabinet, 2D legal w/lock Hon 514C LK # 128R 57300 W

File cabinet, 4D letter w/lock Hon 214P LK # 349T 49021 W



File cabinet, 4D legal w/lock Hon 314CP LK # 324E 49902 W


File cabinet, 4D w/lock Hon LK # 143R 63576 W

File cabinet, 4D letter w/o lock Hon 214P N/A 49037 W

File cabinet, 4D legal w/lock Hon 214 CP LK # 357E 48989 W

File cabinet, 4D legal w/lock Hon 214 CP LK #107 50436 W


(Must be s Jbmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)

Location/Site: Room 72/Sierra Hi •h


PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR ORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


CONDITION (W /NW)

File cabinet, 4D letter w/lock Hon 314P LK # 107 50430 W

cart, Wilson Tuffy Jumbo WTVJ44E N/A 62512 W

chair, Beam 3-seat, no pads N/A N/A 49128 W







chair, Beam 2-seat w/1 table, no pads N/A N/A 49133 W

(Must beisubmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


SURPLUS PROPERTY LISTING (ATTACHMENT)



DESCRIPTION

TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned) WORKING, NON-WORKING AND TECHNOLOGY ITEMS. A SINGLE COVER SHEET CAN BE USED FOR ALL.


chair, blue paisley, low back National 87-MTB N/A 48904 NW

1

(Must bel bmitted as an attachment to the Surplus Property Form)


Auction:

Surplus:

Transferred to:

x





Requested by: Jose Areallano Date: March 30, 2017

Authorized by: March 30, 2017

Site: Weston Ranch High School Item Desc: See the attached

Serial #: See the attached (If applicable)

District ID #: See the attached

Reason for Surplus: x Working (detail): See the attached

Not working (detail): See the attached

Teanology Items nolonger meetmg Distrfft standard systeiff-requirenients:—Items on the attached sheets have reached end of life cycle (beyond 7 years) and/or the repairs or maintenance costs exceed the value of the equipment.

Purchasing\ Surplus \Auction.wpd Rev. 03/11

or.rAe_rJ

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NON-SURPLUS E-Waste and/or Classroom Furniture Removal Reques

(E-mail completed form to [email protected])

Location/Site: ---)151sre)St tc( --..k7 -- ---(All fterns4ntisH) ted ‘Ni Custodian)

P47

Administrator Approval:

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY (Any forms that cannot be read will be returned)

This form to be used for classroom furniture and/or e-waste items with an original purchase price of less than $200.00 (i.e. cords, mice, keyboards, electric staplers, etc.) that are not working or no longer of use to the site. Pickups scheduled within two weeks

of approval.

DESCRIPTION Total Number of CONDITION

Units/Boxes (W or NW)

P48


PkLocation/Site: _av4,. C-L5


DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

/NW

---x-Yvt.- F---4- 2:-D syfu-e\---c-0a- vot6 \iJ LA-.2eAz-Nsc., yit., P7c-fiQi-ssc_a__- rzweas-roic, 3

-7)tb\ -D c--).00 ---ro=b1N- 6'19,tocitO2r-ics— tA)

7.V -.3vx_16-tcie ? -k,21,0 W , V-A-vA. 51,(wick+z),(1.- --p,,.- \ t313 N) iA)

--c_cf,,L141,-- 73•FD--Lic '- 'inv-4-- --rct-14111 ---*cw-k-1( t/J n-l-ni4Q;\-- PA-rz-D



P49

Location/Site:


DISTRICT


MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DECAL #

pN/NWI

f o,A ab.)-- VV\--vv\Tt.-)C512.-- SaW1-3 Kti \ulna) -47)3(k_ -01\--k1A-MC)-(2---- BSW.r2, N UJ

V-Z kjli A-OLIAL- 'Or\ -V YfT/0 1L-- e77)1X 5- NIA) to\a, uu

\ - )uwjA A-abli AA-Akv-Dp 82R1i3 N1LJ •ir 114 \\J\Arlio -(4qt AA -nr+-Tkryr— B3D2-1 iJi),

LI; 6k WilCiA '71r-At -k. AIN—WM UP---- t8-2.4V1

gzroti I\kji

[NAIL) V•t>k \-6& elk 4rilae or\ -r-T-wfi-- ,J--- Ci,c(){0- --4,42- ikhiv-v14- 13, 1-W7D Ar:142zob mo=t)

._/9)J,-- '__O-c--cti-afz-,11)A,v499)-(7_, civrz- \ono VD'i t3fc-- NIki



Agenda Item

Department: Business Services Type: Consent Item

Item Number: 14

DATE: April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Business Services

TITLE: Acceptance of District Warrants

Background/Rationale:

The Warrant Report is for the periods February 27, 2017 through April 9, 2017.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: Administration requests acceptance of the Warrant Report.

Presentation: ®No ri Yes (attached) ❑ Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved By: Business Services Department

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board Agendas

Consent Agenda Item /


BOARD PAYMENT REPORT

MEETING DATE: April 18, 2017

CHECKS DATED: 2/27/17 to 4/9/17

ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated 02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Check Check Number Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object Comment

Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017

Check Amount

10241730 02/27/2017 Granllbakken Tahoe 01-5220 Travel/Conference 759.60

10241731 02/27/2017 Hyatt Regency Sacramento 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,519.27

01-5800 Travel/Conference 2,116.38 3,635.65 10241732 02/27/2017 Hyatt Vineyard Creek Hotel And Spa 01-5220 Travel/Conference 399.40

1024173 02/27/2017 Central Sanitary Supply 01-4310 Custodial Equipment/Supplies 204.86

01-4400 Custodial Equipment/Supplies 4,033 22 4,238.08 10241734 02/27/2017 Illuminate Education Inc 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,197.00 10241735 02/27/2017 Legend Music 01-4400 Instructional Supplies 8,420.98

10244736 02/27/2017 Residence Inn Sacramento Downtown at Capitol Park 01-5220 Travel/Conference 705.46

01-5800 Travel/Conference 1,058.19 1,763.65

10241737 02/27/2017 City of Manteca-Finance Dept 01-5800 Fees 250.00 10241738 02/27/2017 Floral Resources 01-4310 CONFIRMING-Instructional Supplies 332.46

Instructional Supplies 37,08

Unpaid Sales Tax 1.53- 368.01

10241739 02/27/2017 G&K Services 01-5610 Rental Contract 280.82

10241740 02/27/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 406.70 Custodial/Instructional Supplies 133.67 540.37

10241741 02/27/2017 Harvest Power Calif LLC 01-5570 Grounds Dumping Fees 150.89

10241742 02/27/2017 Normac Inc 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 3,163.91

10241743 02/27/2017 Redi-Mark 01-5800 Customization Services/Admin Supplies 21.11

10241744 02/27/2017 Riso Products of Sacramento 01-5640 Maintenance Agreement 116.41

10241745 02/27/2017 Robomatter Inc 01-5800 Software License 1,098.99

10241746 02/27/2017 South San Joaquin Educ Center 01-5100 Outside Services 8,048.74

10241747 02/27/2017 Virco Inc 01-4310 Instructional Furniture 2,168.95

Instructional Supplies 306.97 2,475.92

10241748 02/27/2017 Capital Lumber Company 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 398.76

10241749 02/27/2017 CT Brayton & Sons Inc 21-6210 Construction Services/Lincoln Elem . 722,601.81

Construction Services/Sequoia Elem 519,290.87 1,241,892.68

10241750 02/27/2017 Anthony C. Dahl 01-5220 CA All State Music Ed/MJHS/Feb 478.84

16-19/Final 10241751 02/27/2017 Economic & Planning Systems 25-5800 Outside Services 2,882.50

77-5800 Outside Services 84.37



81-5800 Outside Services 84.37 3,220.00

10241752 02/27/2017 Michael C. Norwood 01-5220 Learning & the Brain Conf/LHS/Feb 255.95

17-19/Final 10241753 02/27/2017 Illuminate Education Inc 01-5220 Travel/Conference 2,793.00

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the I ESCAPE Km= preceding Checks be approved. Page 1 of 55

045 - Manteca Unified School District Generated for Susan Mathern (SUSANMA45), Apr 10 2017 8:19AM

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE

preceding Checks be approved. Page 2 of 55 ONLINE

ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date

Expensed Comment Amount

04/18/2017

Check Number

Check Date Pay to the Order of

Check Amount

10241754 02/27/2017 Dannielle K. Knight 01-5220 CSEA Paraeducator Conf/LHS/Mar 129.60

14-16/Adv Perdiem 10241755 02/27/2017 Cheryl L. Meeker 01-5222 NISL Training/Elem Ed/Feb 7-9/Final 72.01

10241756 02/27/2017 Kenneth S. Myers 09-5222 USS Hornet Field Trip/LHS/Feb 3/Entrance for students/adults

209.00

10241757 02/27/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,921.24

10241758 02/27/2017 Allyson D. Peck Cancelled CSEA paraeducator Conf/N Vision/Mar 129.60 *

14-16/ADv Perdiem

Cancelled on 03/30/201/ 10241759 02/27/2017 Dianna L. Puett 01-5222 WASC Training/SHS/Jan 24/Mileage/Final 66.34

10241760 02/27/2017 Todays Classroom 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 286.80

10241761 02/27/2017 Les F, Wheeler 01-5222 AP Wkshp Psychology/SHS/Jan 75.97

28/Mileage/Final 10241762 02/27/2017 Tyleen M. Williams 01-5220 Learning and the Brain Conf/MHS/Feb 549.00

17-19/Final 10241763 02/27/2017 WOW On Wheels 01-5800 Contract Services 730.02

10241764 02/27/2017 City of Manteca-Finance Dept 01-5510 Utility Water/Garbage/Sewer 26,630.58

Utility/Water/Garbage/Sewer 421.60

01-5570 Refuse Service 146.72 27,198.90

10241765 02/27/2017 CALPERS Fiscal Svcs Division 01-3412 CaIPERS health Premium 14,136.40

10241766 02/27/2017 Evan-Moor Educational 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 136.55

01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books 101.87


10241767 02/27/2017 PG&E 01-5520 Utility - Gas/Electric Service 66,825.18

10241768 02/27/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 09-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books 33.70


10241769 02/27/2017 Valero Marketing & Supply 01-4382 Credit Card Purchases of Fuel 111.12

Fuel 147.97 259.09

10241770 02/27/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 112.28

Admin Supplies 3,599.97

Admin/Instructional Supplies 874.44

Instructional Supplies 10,026.00

Instructional/Library Supplies 271.92 14,884.61

10241771 02/27/2017 Tammy L. Dunbar 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lincoln/March 15-18/Adv 192.00

Perdiem 10241772 02/27/2017 Lesley A. Fontanilla 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 76.80

Perdiem

045 - Manteca Unified School District

Generated for Susan Mathern (SUSANMA45), Apr 10 2017 8:19AM

ReqPayl2c Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment

Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017


Check Amount

10241773 02/27/2017 Alejandra Hill 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10241774 02/27/2017 Suzanne R. McCreath 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10241775 02/27/2017 Roberto F. Rosas 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10241776 02/27/2017 Stacie L. Silveira 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10241777 02/27/2017 Jennifer D. Taylor 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10241778 02/27/2017 Laurie A. Vazquez 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Adv 172.80

Perdiem 10242077 03/01/2017 Kristen A. Buck 01-5222 AET Workshop/EUHS/Feb 100.00

14-115/Registration/Final

10242078 03/01/2017 Christopher L. Courtney 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/SHS/Mar 15-18/Adv 211.20

Perdlem 10242079 03/01/2017 Deanna L. Diggs 01-5220 Learning and the Brain Conf/MHS/Feb 748.45

17-19/Fnal 10242080 03/01/2017 Jennifer N. Lew-Vang 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Health Svcs/Jan 9-30 34.61

10242081 03/01/2017 Kristen L. Messer 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Comp Ed/Mar 15-18/Adv 211.20

Perdiem

10242082 03/01/2017 Tristyn C. Silva 01-5220 Mentoring & Supervising Conf/EUHS/Jan 91.85

30-31/Final 01-5222 AET Workshop/EUHS/Feb 14-15/Final 196.94 288.79

10242083 03/01/2017 Anne P. Steiner 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/DO/Mar 15-19/Adv Perdiem 192.00

10242084 03/01/2017 Stephan W. Unterholzner 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/SHS/Mar 15-18/Adv 243.20

Perdiem

10242085 03/01/2017 Barton Overhead Door Inc 01-5680 Building Repairs 110.00

10242086 03/01/2017 BorderLan Security 01-5800 Software Subscription 77,065.60

10242087 03/01/2017 CA State Parks Ticket Office 01-5800 Admission Tickets 124.00

10242088 03/01/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Student Incentives 381.79

10242089 03/01/2017 CASBO Calif Assc of School Bus Ofcls 01-5222 Travel/Conference 510.00

10242090 03/01/2017 CASCD 01-5222 Travel/Conference 440.00

10242091 03/01/2017 Encore Data Products Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 8,534.43

10242092 03/01/2017 ER Vine & Sons Inc 01-4382 Transportation Fuel/Supplies/Fees 9,071.46

10242093 03/01/2017 Flora Fresh Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,152.48

10242094 03/01/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 7.08

10242095 03/01/2017 G&K Services 01-5600 Rental Services 230.24

10242096 03/01/2017 Give Every Child A Chance 01-5100 Contract Services 118,175.84

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the

preceding Checks be approved.

ESCAPE

ONCINt

Page 3 of 55


Red Payl 2c

Board Report



Board Meeting Date 04/18/2017

Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10242097 03/01/2017 Hilmar Cheese Company 01-4310 Fieldtrip Expense 280.00 10242098 03/01/2017 Holt Of California 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 457.38 10242099 03/01/2017 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co. 01-4200 Books 124.92 10242100 03/01/2017 ION - Wilco Inc. 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 413.09 10242101 03/01/2017 JW Pepper & Son Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 108.88 10242102 03/01/2017 MACK Brass of Virginia 01-4400 Instructional Equipment 18,913.80

Unpaid Sales Tax 1,405.80- 17,508.00 10242103 03/01/2017 National Association For Pupil Transportation 01-5300 Membership Fee 100.00 10242104 03/01/2017 North Valley School Lodi Campus-Div of Victor 01-5800 Outside Services 2,694.93 10242105 03/01/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 820.47

Instructional Equipment/Supplies 26,452.31

Instructional Supplies 162.12

01-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 605.43 28,040.33 10242106 03/01/2017 PG&E 01-5520 UTILITITES GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 5,737.27 10242107 03/01/2017 Redi-Mark 01-5800 CONFIRMING - Customization Services 138.76 10242108 03/01/2017 San Joaquin County Vector & Disease Control Dist 01-5884 Assessment Fees 703.16 10242109 03/01/2017 Santa Rosa FFA 01-4400 Instructional Equipment 3,247.50

Unpaid Sales Tax 247.50- 3,000.00 10242110 03/01/2017 School Services Of Calif 01-5800 Outside Services 230.00 10242111 03/01/2017 School Specialty 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 173.76

Unpaid Sales Tax .40 174.16 10242112 03/01/2017 Shred It Usa Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 155.58 10242113 03/01/2017 Western Building Materials 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 229.79

Unpaid Sales Tax .90- 228.89 10242259 03/02/2017 Adrian Hollins 01-5800 Contract Services 140.00 10242260 03/02/2017 Alfredo Martinez 01-5800 Contract Services 70.00 10242261 03/02/2017 Anna Haley 01-5800 Contract Services 420.00 10242262 03/02/2017 Bank Of New York Mellon Corporate Trust Dept 78-5800 Administration Fees 2,120.00 10242263 03/02/2017 Bobby Wyatt Jr 01-5800 Contract Services 140.00 10242264 03/02/2017 Brandi Sawyer 01-5800 Contract Services 315.00 10242265 03/02/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-5610 Equipment Rental/Instructional Supplies 120.78 10242266 03/02/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 220.54


13-4310 978 - Supplies 73.66

95-4310 Student Incentives 97.92 588.64 10242267 03/02/2017 Daniel Wyatt 01-5800 Contract Services 140.00

10242268 03/02/2017 De'Andre Ragsdale 01-5800 Contract Services 800.00

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the preceding Checks be approved.

ESCAPE

ONLINE

Page 4 of 55



ReqPay12c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10242269 03/02/2017 Deonte Burton 01-5800 Contract Services 535.00 10242270 03/02/2017 Duane Huebner 01-5800 Contract Services 490.00 10242271 03/02/2017 ER Vine & Sons Inc 01-4382 Transportation Fuel/Supplies/Fees 4,399.71 10242272 03/02/2017 Home Depot-Grounds Acct #6035-3225-0399-9108 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 162.98 10242273 03/02/2017 Hunter Johnson 01-5800 Contract Services 840.00 10242274 03/02/2017 International Greenhouse Company 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,052.57

Unpaid Sales Tax 7.26- 1,045.31 10242275 03/02/2017 Joanderson Ajay Menorca 01-5800 Contract Services 310.00 10242276 03/02/2017 Justan Meredith 01-5800 Contract Services 785.00 10242277 03/02/2017 Michael Scott Vander Molen 01-5800 Contract Services 380.00 10242278 03/02/2017 Molly DeRoos 01-5800 Contract Services 105.00 10242279 03/02/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 20.91

Insturctional Supplies 108,29 129.20 10242280 03/02/2017 Richard Louis Nogueira 01-5800 Contract Services 690.00 10242281 03/02/2017 Robert Livers 01-5800 Contract Services 155.00 10242282 03/02/2017 Shaun Wilson 01-5800 Contract Services 140.00 10242283 03/02/2017 Wayne Huit Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies/Services 1,674.84

10242284 03/02/2017 Edges Electrical Group LLC Attn: Accts Receivable 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,786.66 10242285 03/02/2017 Electronic Waste Recovery Center 01-5570 Outside Services/Supplies 765.08 10242286 03/02/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 45.01


Instuctional Supplies 10.04

09-4310 Instructional Supplies 51.16 526.98 10242287 03/02/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 392.17

Custodial/Instructional Supplies 393.70

13-4310 978 - Supplies 4.12 789.99 10242288 03/02/2017 Johnstone Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,763.79

10242289 03/02/2017 Manteca Auto Parts 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 1,189.76 10242290 03/02/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 407.47

Instructional Supplies 713.73 1,121.20 10242291 03/02/2017 PG&E 01-5520 UTILITIES GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,561.81

10242292 03/02/2017 Redi-Mark 01-5800 Customization Services 2,629.78

Customization Services/Supplies 122.76 2,752.54 10242293 03/02/2017 AT&T 01-5943 Utility 7,430.83

10242294 03/02/2017 AT&T 01-5940 Utility - Telephone Service 50.79 10242295 03/02/2017 Carlos Lopez Designs 01-5800 CONFIRMING - Outside Services 300.00

10242296 03/02/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4310 Admin Supplies 6.40


I ESCAPE MUM preceding Checks be approved. Page 5 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Number


Check Amount

10242296 03/02/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 56.23

Unpaid Sales Tax .49- 62.14

10242523 03/03/2017 Batteries Plus Bulbs 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 560.22

10242524 03/03/2017 BSN Sports 01-4310 Athletic Equipment/Supplies 285.80

01-4400 Athletic Equipment/Supplies 2,523.00

Customized Equipment 3,206.76

01-5800 Customized Equipment 107.66 6,123,22

10242525 03/03/2017 Calif Assoc for Bilingual Educ 01-5220 Travel/Conference 3,075.00

10242526 03/03/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 263.42

01-5610 Equipment Rental/Supplies 13.64

11-4400 Instructional Equipment 6,507.99

Unpaid Sales Tax 60.12- 6,724.93

10242527 03/03/2017 California's Great America Attn: Group Sales 01-5800 Admission Tickets 1,212.00

10242528 03/03/2017 Capitol Door Sales 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,399.75

10242529 03/03/2017 CDW Government 01-4400 Technology Equipment 7,729.05

01-5800 Technology Equipment 899.00 8,628.05

10242530 03/03/2017 Custom Electronic Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 974.04

10242531 03/03/2017 D.R. Horton 25-8681 Dev Fee Relmb/Parcel 226-340-35/Square 6,763.68

Footage Reduction

10242532 03/03/2017 D.R. Horton 25-8681 Dev Fee Reimb/Parcel 226-350-44/Square

footage reduction

6,763.68

10242533 03/03/2017 D.R. Horton 25-8681 Dev Fee Reimb/Parcel 226-350-48/Square 1,300.32

Footage Reduction

10242534 03/03/2017 Fastenal Company 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 129.69

09-4310 Instructional Supplies 4.67 134.36

10242535 03/03/2017 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co. 01-4200 Books 12,403.41

Online Subscription 327.75 12,731.16

10242536 03/03/2017 Lakeshore Learning Materials 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 140.46

01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books 44.51 184.97

10242537 03/03/2017 Melford Larson 25-8681 Dev Fee Refund/Parcel 223-110-08/Sq 5,950.56

Footage demolished

10242538 03/03/2017 Melford Larson 25-8681 Dev Fee Refund/Parcel 223-110-10/Sq 2,775.36

Footage demolished

10242539 03/03/2017 San Joaquin Delta College SJDC Choral Dept 01-5800 Entry Fee 140.00

10242540 03/03/2017 Southwest Medical 01-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 1,400.36

01-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 15,101.77 16,502.13

10242541 03/03/2017 US Games 01-4400 Athletic Equipment 516.56

10242542 03/03/2017 Alcatraz Cruises LLC 01-5800 Admission Tickets 2,924.00



ESCAPE 'ONLINE Page 6 of 55






Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10242543 03/03/2017 Kevin C. Allred 01-5220 2017 State Leadership Conf/WRHS/Mar 179.20 16-19/Adv Perdiem

10242544 03/03/2017 Barnes & Noble Inc 01-4200 Admin Books 156.89 10242545 03/03/2017 Tamara L. Basepayne 01-5220 2017 State Leadership Conf/WRHS/Mar 179.20

16-19/Adv Perdiem 10242546 03/03/2017 Dan R. Beukelman 01-5220 Illuminate Ed User Conf/SHS/Feb 662.25

21-22/Final 10242547 03/03/2017 Jeannette M. Boutte 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 340.00

15-18/Registration 10242548 03/03/2017 Buttes/Center State Pipe & Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 679.04 10242549 03/03/2017 Craig Mitchell 01-5800 Contract Services 970.00 10242550 03/03/2017 Crest/Good Mfg Co 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 678.51 10242551 03/03/2017 Orazio V. Davi 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 399.90

10242552 03/03/2017 Georgies Ceramic & Clay 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 221.85


10242553 03/03/2017 Kerry A. Gilmore 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 340.00

15-18/Registration 10242554 03/03/2017 Rebecca J. Hunter 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 340.00

15-18/Registration 10242555 03/03/2017 Ingram & Brauns Musik Shoppe 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 3,233.17

10242556 03/03/2017 Greg R. Leland 01-5220 Illuminate Ed User Conf/LHS/Feb 762.70

21-22/Final 10242557 03/03/2017 Molly T. Lowe 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 340.00

15-18/Registration 10242558 03/03/2017 Cheryl L. Meeker 01-5220 CISC Symposium 2017/DO/Feb 211.90

22-24/Final 10242559 03/03/2017 Lori E. Pellegrino-Jackson 01-5220 Western Regional Forum 2017/EUHS/Feb 350.00

8-10/Registration/Final 10242560 03/03/2017 Megan F. Peterson 01-5220 Western Regional Forum 2017/EUHS/Feb 350.00

8-10/Registration/Final 10242823 03/06/2017 American Trash Management Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 240.00

10242824 03/06/2017 Bowtie Promotions Inc 01-5800 Customization Services 2,608.83


10242825 03/06/2017 Champion Industrial Contractors Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 2,573.82

Unpaid Sales Tax .03 2,573.85

10242826 03/06/2017 Discount Ag Parts Manteca Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies/Repairs 31.01

10242827 03/06/2017 Fun and Function 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 63.05


10242828 03/06/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 585.23


ESCAPE

Generated for Susan Mathern (SUSANMA45), Apr 10 2017 8:19AM 045 - Manteca Unified School District

Expensed

Check Comment

Amount

Amount

Maintenance Supplies

Grounds Supplies

Replenish Stores

Unpaid Sales Tax Instructional Supplies

UTILITIES GAS/ELECTRIC SERVICE

Webinar Fee

Travel/Conference

Instructional Supplies



Farm Supplies

Classroom Furniture

Classroom Furniture

Membership Fee

040 - Program Food

070 - Program Food

270 - Program Food

420 - Program Food

600 - Program Food

620 - Program Food

650 - Program Food

700 - Program Food

750 - Program Food

978 - Uniforms

010 - Food

270 - Food

650 - Food

700 - Food

750 - Food

978 - Supplies 978 - Customization Services/Supplies

Unpaid Sales Tax 978 - Equipment

Presales refund: status change

010 - Food

040 - Food

419.46

752.14

34.22

1.73-

12,748.69

9,653.47

2,494.05

1,157.17

1,897.65

1,473.09

1,169.87

654,86

1,481.28

1,639.78

1,040.64

222.96

183.02

475.02

208.80

469.80

62.07

4.73-

411.30

2,079.20

32.49

1,097.67

9,314.80

1,343.00

1,396,00

12.21

51.42

595.77

1,387.82

22,402.16

145.00

13,008.39

624.56

1,559.60

31.44

57.34 811.88

97.75

ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated 02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017 Board Meeting Date 04/18/2017

Check Number

Check Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object

10242829 03/06/2017 Guntert Steel 01-4310

10242830 03/06/2017 Horizon 01-4310

10242831 03/06/2017 Liberty Flags Inc 01-9320

10242832 03/06/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4310

10242833 03/06/2017 PG&E 01-5520

10242834 03/06/2017 School Services Of Calif 01-5800

10242835 03/06/2017 SkilIpath Seminars 01-5222

10242836 03/06/2017 Snap On Industrial A Div of IDSC Holdings LLC 01-4310

10242837 03/06/2017 Standard Plumbing Supply 01-4310

10242838 03/06/2017 Stockton Fence & Material Co 01-4310

10242839 03/06/2017 Veterinary Service Inc 01-4310

10242840 03/06/2017 Vireo Inc 25-4310

25-4400

10242841 03/06/2017 CAPCA 13-5300

10242842 03/06/2017 Danielsen Company Inc, The 13-4710

10242843 03/06/2017 G&K Services 13-5800

10242844 03/06/2017 Gold Star Foods Inc 13-4710

10242845 03/06/2017 Grainger 13-4310

10242846 03/06/2017 IDville Inc 13-5800

10242847 03/06/2017 JM Equipment 13-4400

10242848 03/06/2017 Rebecca Gaston 13-8634

10242849 03/06/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 13-4710


preceding Checks be approved. Page 8 of 55


I ESCAPE ONLINE

ReqPay12c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment

Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017


Check Amount

10242849 03/06/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 13-4710 070 - Program Food 316.05

190 - Food 1,384.40

420 - Food 490.55

600 - Food 396.80

620 - Food 736.65

650 - Food 3,367.05

700 - Food 474.05

750 - Food 1,160.60 10,816.65

10242850 03/06/2017 United Refrigeration Inc 13-4310 978 - Supplies 385.10

10242851 03/06/2017 Virco Inc 13-4400 Site Equipment 2,155.39

10242852 03/06/2017 Central Restaurant Products 13-4310 979 - Supplies 319.68

10242853 03/06/2017 Cole R. Dutter 13-5222 Conf CAPCA/DO NE/Jan 26/final 12.95

Conf World Ag Expo/DO NE/Feb 15/final 203.91 216.86

10242854 03/06/2017 FedEx 13-5920 978 - Shipping Services 11,61

10242855 03/06/2017 Tracee R. Franks 13-5222 Conf CNIPS NSDT Training/DO 139.53

NE/Jan26/final Conf CSNA Mother Load/DO NE/Feb20/final 70.51 210.04

10242856 03/06/2017 Libby Torres 13-8634 Presales refund: status change 130.00

10242857 03/06/2017 Joe 0. Fires Jr 13-5222 Conf World Ag Expo/DO NE/Feb 15/final 29.50

10242858 03/06/2017 Shred It Usa Inc 13-5800 979 - Outside Services 617.61

10242859 03/06/2017 Sonitrol 13-5800 979 - Maintenance Agreement 186.39

10242860 03/06/2017 Sysco of Central Calif 13-4710 010 Food 319.16

040 Food 1,131.65

190 Food 328.38

420 Food 219.94

600 Food 217.67

750 Food 127.22 2,344.02

10242861 03/06/2017 Wayne Huit Inc 13-4310 978-Supplies 305.75

10242862 03/06/2017 CAL-HOSA 01-5220 Travel/Conference 315.00


10242863 03/06/2017 Calif Assoc Future Farmers Of America 01-5220 Field Trip Expense 220.00

01-5800 Field Trip Expense 1,320.00 1,540.00

10242864 03/06/2017 Champion Industrial Contractors Inc 01-5660 Maintenance Repairs 4,870.11

10242865 03/06/2017 Bradford J. Edom 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/EUHS/Feb 325.60

21-22/Final 10242866 03/06/2017 Deborah M. Forte 01-5220 Title I 2017 conf/Comp Ed/Feb 22-25/Final 57.30

10242867 03/06/2017 Fidel F. Gonzales 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 conf/MHS/Feb 21-22/Final 17.00

10242868 03/06/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 3,438.90


ESCAPE


ReqPayl 2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10242868 03/06/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial/Instructional Supplies 905.25


10242869 03/06/2017 Legend Music 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 272.32

10242870 03/06/2017 Lincoln Aquatics Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 3,022.86

10242871 03/06/2017 Manteca Unified School Dist 01-4200 Revolving Cash Recap #11/Feb 1-28 2017 12.00

01-4310 Revolving Cash Recap #11/Feb 1-28 2017 32.00

01-5800 Revolving Cash Recap #11/Feb 1-28 2017 500.00-

01-8699 Revolving Cash Recap #11/Feb 1-28 2017 6,430.09 5,974.09 10242872 03/06/2017 Megan F. Peterson 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/EUHS/Feb 432.11

21-22/Final 10242873 03/06/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 127.36 10242874 03/06/2017 Julie R. Smith 01-5220 Title I 2017 Conf/Comp Ed/Feb 22-25/Final 375.17

10242875 03/06/2017 Sysco of Central Calif 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 2,002.61

10242876 03/06/2017 The Speech Pathology Group Inc 01-5100 Contracted Services 22,134.00

10242877 03/06/2017 Calif Sport Design 01-5800 Customization Services 1,122.71 10242878 03/06/2017 Follett School Solutions Inc 01-5800 Customization Services 184.88

10242879 03/06/2017 Interstate Truck Center 01-6500 CONFIRMING-Equipment Replacement 13,528.31

10242880 03/06/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Equipment/Supplies 81.19

Admin Supplies 2,549.27


Teacher Awards 90.26

01-4400 Admin Equipment/Supplies 1,689.59 6,888.88 10242881 03/06/2017 Old McGowan's Feed Store 01-4310 Farm Supplies 65.09

10242882 03/06/2017 Perma-Bound 01-4200 Library Books 9.82

10242883 03/06/2017 Put in Cups LLC 01-5800 Customization Services 1,625.79

10242884 03/06/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4200 Admin Books 132,84




10242885 03/06/2017 Cheryl A. Behler 01-5220 HOSA 2017 Conf/MHS/Mar 16-18/Adv 179.20

Perdiem 10242886 03/06/2017 Gregory G. Conway 01-5220 HOSA 2017 Conf/MHS/Mar 16-18/Adv 179.20

Perdiem 10242887 03/06/2017 Andrew M. Lee 01-5220 HOSA 2017 conf/MHS/Mar 16-18/Adv 179.20

Perdiem 10242888 03/06/2017 Ruxandra M. Manu 01-5220 CASP Conf/Spec Ed/Mar 23-25/Adv 44.80

Perdiem


ESCAPE

ONLINE

Page 10 of 55



ReqPay12c

Board Report


Check Check Number Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Amount

10242889 03/06/2017 Denise J. Nagao 01-5220 CASP Conf/Spec Ed/Mar 23-25/Adv 89.60

Perdiem 10242890 03/06/2017 California's Valued Trust Attn: Finance Dept 01-9513 CVT Health Premium 2,342,288.55

10243158 03/07/2017 AA and Bob Allen Inc 01-4310 Landscaping Supplies 1,714.68

10243159 03/07/2017 Beynon Sports Surfaces Inc 01-5600 Outside Service 2,900.00

10243160 03/07/2017 Bovee Environmental Management 21-6283 Testing Fees/Lincoln 350.00

10243161 03/07/2017 Brian Johnson 01-5800 Reimbursement 250.00

10243162 03/07/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-4310 Equipmental Rental/Supplies 318.17

01-5610 Equipmental Rental/Supplies 74.40 392.57

10243163 03/07/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 75.98


10243164 03/07/2017 Daily Fresh Donuts 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 80.00

10243165 03/07/2017 Dons Mobile Glass Inc 01-5600 Outside Services 176.24

10243166 03/07/2017 Elite Shutters and Shadings In c 01-5600 Outside Service 357.23



10243168 03/07/2017 Flora Fresh Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 124.26

10243169 03/07/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 38.69


09-4310 Instructional Supplies 56.71

95-4310 ASB Supplies 178.12 1,418.28


10243171 03/07/2017 Grover Landscape Services Inc 01-4310 Operational Supplies 708.68

10243172 03/07/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 527.93

Custodial/Instructional Supplies

Instructional Supplies 1,547.44 2,075.37

10243173 03/07/2017 Interim Staffing Modesto 01-5100 Contract Services 1,340.00

10243174 03/07/2017 J&J Printing 01-5803 Outside Printing Services 206.15

10243175 03/07/2017 Janis Music Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 68.30

10243176 03/07/2017 Jostens Inc 01-5800 Customization Services 1,041.57

Customization Services/Supplies 2,167.51 3,209.08

10243177 03/07/2017 Lathrop High School 01-5800 Fieldtrip Expense 570.96

10243178 03/07/2017 Lincoln Electric Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 368.37

10243179 03/07/2017 Mc Coy Truck Tire Svc Center 01-4390 Transportation Tires/Supplies/Repairs 1,670.42

10243180 03/07/2017 Modesto Steel Co Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,247.22

10243181 03/07/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 468.46

10243182 03/07/2017 Pacific Copy & Print Inc 01-4310 Print Shop Supplies 1,991.80


ESCAPE




ReqPayl2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243183 03/07/2017 Perma-Bound 01-4200 Books 978.19


10243184 03/07/2017 Photo Warehouse 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 227.70

Unpaid Sales Tax 2.10- 225.60 10243185 03/07/2017 Pinasco Mechanical Contractor 01-5600 Maintenance Repairs 5,724.33

Unpaid Sales Tax 13.16 5,737.49 10243186 03/07/2017 Point Quest Education Inc 01-5100 Outside Services 58,995.82

10243187 03/07/2017 Redi-Mark 01-5800 Customization Services 36.33

10243188 03/07/2017 Sara Nelson 01-5800 Mileage Reimbursement 101.12 10243189 03/07/2017 School Specialty 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 350.58 10243190 03/07/2017 StanIslaus County Office of Education 01-5800 Field Trip Expense 800.00

10243191 03/07/2017 Stockton Environmental Inc 01-5600 Outside Services 670.00 10243192 03/07/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 14.02

Unpaid Sales Tax 1.07- 12.95 10243193 03/07/2017 US Bank Corp Payment System 01-4310 District Purchasing Card 35,381.90 10243194 03/07/2017 US Healthworks Medical Grp Pc 01-5846 Pre-Employment Physicals 106.00 10243195 03/07/2017 Fresno Oxygen/Barnes Welding 11-4310 Instructional Supplies 180.42 10243196 03/07/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 3,098.31

Instructional Equipment/Supplies 14.71


Technology Supplies 930.95

01-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 604.04 17,400.54

10243197 03/07/2017 Veritiv Operating Company 01-4310 Print Shop Supplies 1,486.92

01-9320 Replenish Stores 20,832.06 22,318.98

10243198 03/07/2017 Calif Department Of Education 21-6214 Planning/Golden West ES 7,350.00 Planning/Sequoia ES 6,948.66 14,298.66

10243199 03/07/2017 Fisher Scientific Acct # 497643 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 229.19 10243200 03/07/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 121,54




Unpaid Sales Tax .05- 1,135.12 10243201 03/07/2017 Golden Bay Fence Plus Iron Works Inc 01-4310 Outside Services/Supplies 2,372.84

01-5800 Outside Services/Supplies 412.00

Unpaid Sales Tax 180.84- 2,604.00 10243202 03/07/2017 Interim Staffing Modesto 01-5100 Contract Services 1,340.00 10243203 03/07/2017 Kristi Marguerite Dominguez 01-5800 Mileage Reimbursement 971,56

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the I FSCAPE preceding Checks be approved. Page 12 of 55

045 • Manteca Unified School District


The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the preceding Checks be approved. Page 13 of 55

ReqPay12c Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243204 03/07/2017 Lincoln Aquatics Inc 01-5660 Maintenance Repairs 23,686.85 10243205 03/07/2017 Safety Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 50.33


10243206 03/07/2017 SoftFile 01-5800 Outside Services 4,500.00 10243207 03/07/2017 Spinelli Donald & Nott 67-5810 Legal Services 1,544.80

10243208 03/07/2017 Stericycle Inc 01-5800 Outside Services /Supplies 514.83 10243209 03/07/2017 Stockton Educational Center 01-5100 Outside Services 59,188.86 10243210 03/07/2017 Super Duper Publications 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 105.87

Unpaid Sales Tax 8.07- 97.80 10243211 03/07/2017 The College Board 01-5222 Travel/Conference 225.00

10243212 03/07/2017 US Games 01-9320 Stores Replenishment 1,908.99

10243213 03/07/2017 Brookside Country Club 01-5620 Prom Expenses/Rental Agreement 2,500.00

10243214 03/07/2017 Caesars Palace Las Vegas 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,469.44 10243215 03/07/2017 JW Marriott Austin 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,935.15

10243216 03/07/2017 Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel 01-5220 Travel/Conference 776.37


10243217 03/07/2017 Madonna Inn 01-5220 Travel/Conference 793.26


10243218 03/07/2017 Motel 6 Palm Springs Downtown Cancelled Travel/Conference 492.83 *

Cancelled on 03/30/2017 10243219 03/07/2017 Nugget Casino Resort 01-5220 Travel/Conference 326.32

10243220 03/07/2017 Westin Long Beach Hotel 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,229.82

10243221 03/07/2017 Barnes & Noble Inc 01-4200 Books 416.41

10243222 03/07/2017 Big Valley Ford Inc 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repair 272.27

10243223 03/07/2017 Bovee Environmental Management 21-6283 Testing Fees/Lathrop ES 1,675.00

Testing Fees/Sequia ES 1,250.00 2,925.00

10243224 03/07/2017 Calif School Employees Assoc Federal ID #94-1301733 01-5220 Travel/Conference 327.00

10243225 03/07/2017 Campbell-Keller 01-4310 Admin Furniture 1,742,83

Admin Supplies 1,804.07 3,546.90

10243226 03/07/2017 Cen-Cal Fire Systems Inc 01-5600 Maintenance Repairs 14,120.00

10243227 03/07/2017 Continental Sales 01-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 74.31


10243228 03/07/2017 DLR Group Inc 21-6281 Architect Fees/Golden West 19,027.11

10243229 03/07/2017 Image Zone Printing & Graphics 01-5800 Customization Services 881.87

10243230 03/07/2017 Interstate Truck Center 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repair 1,126.99

10243231 03/07/2017 JW Pepper & Son Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 386.70

10243232 03/07/2017 McCoy Truck Tire Service 01-4390 Transportation Tires/Supplies/Repairs 532.00


ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Number


Check Amount



10243234 03/07/2017 Orbach Huff Suarez & Henderson 01-5810 Legal Services 12,100.25

10243235 03/07/2017 Oriental Trading Company 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 64.63


10243236 03/07/2017 Pape Kenworth 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 24.15

01-5670 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 146.22 170.37

10243237 03/07/2017 PASCO Scientific 01-4310 Admin Supplies 574.03

10243238 03/07/2017 Roadrunner Glass Manteca 01-5600 Maintenance Supplies/Repairs 620.59

10243239 03/07/2017 Calif Fire Life & Safety Systems 01-5800 Security System Monitoring 1,554.00

10243240 03/07/2017 Discount Ag Parts Manteca Inc 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repair 175.56

10243241 03/07/2017 Everything Medical LLC 01-9320 Stores Replenishment 555.65


10243242 03/07/2017 Fresno Oxygen Barnes Welding 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 293.05


10243243 03/07/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 309.58

10243244 03/07/2017 Lammersville Unified School District Bus Svc Dept 01-5800 Outside Services 150.00

10243245 03/07/2017 MCR Engineering Inc 01-5800 Engineering Services 480.00

22-6281 Engineering Services/MHS CTE 1,340.00 1,820.00

10243246 03/07/2017 PG&E 01-5520 UTILITIES GAS ELECTRIC SERVICE 393.62

10243247 03/07/2017 Scholastic Inc 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 91.59



10243248 03/07/2017 The Gift Of Speech A ProfSpeech-Lang Path Corp 01-5100 Contract Services 15,645.00

10243249 03/07/2017 Turf Star Inc 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 521.90

10243250 03/07/2017 Wards Science Contract #C012312 01-9320 Stores Replenish 52.23

10243251 03/07/2017 Alboum & Assoc 01-5800 Outside Services 363.36

10243252 03/07/2017 Flora Fresh Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,587.02


10243253 03/07/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Repairs 60.09

01-5660 Equipment Repairs 1,190.42 1,250.51

10243254 03/07/2017 Photo Warehouse 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,568.88


10243255 03/07/2017 Cheryl A. Behler 01-1999 Timesheet submitted late to payroll 722.06

10243426 03/08/2017 Ag Transmission Repair 01-5670 Transportation PartsNehicle Repairs 817.05

10243427 03/08/2017 Bills Mower & Saw 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 251.06

01-5660 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 618.15 869.21

I ESCAPE vONLIt4E• Page 14 of 55




ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment

Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017


Check Amount

10243428 03/08/2017 CASBO Calif Assc of School Bus Ofcls 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,610.00

01-5300 Travel/Conference 320.83 1,930.83 10243429 03/08/2017 Creative Drinks Inc 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 392.17

10243430 03/08/2017 Department Of Justice Accounting Office 01-5844 Outside Services 2,547.00

10243431 03/08/2017 Elite Entertainment 01-5800 Contract Services 595.00

10243432 03/08/2017 Evans Teamwear 01-5800 Customization Services 566.36

Unpaid Sales Tax 5.07- 561.29 10243433 03/08/2017 Fastenal Company 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 70.93


10243435 03/08/2017 Home Depot-Maintenance Acct #6035-3225-0399-9090 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 3,711.55

10243436 03/08/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 89.12

10243437 03/08/2017 Ingram & Brauns Musik Shoppe 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 133.66 10243438 03/08/2017 J&J Printing 01-5800 Customization Services 113.12

10243439 03/08/2017 JM Equipment 01-4400 Transportation Equipment 1,353.13

10243440 03/08/2017 Jostens Inc 01-5800 Customization Services/Supplies 1,519.46

01-5803 Customization Services 2,175.84 3,695.30

10243441 03/08/2017 Manteca Auto Parts 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 2,118.90

10243442 03/08/2017 Pacific Metro Electric Inc 01-6220 Building Repairs 5,749.00

10243443 03/08/2017 Textbook Warehouse 01-4200 Books 641.63

10243444 03/08/2017 US Healthworks Medical Grp Pc 01-5846 Transportation Physical Exams 212.00

13-5846 Pre-Employment Physicals 106.00 318.00

10243445 03/08/2017 Zonar 01-4310 CONFIRMING- Transportation 3,282.01

Supplies/Services 01-5800 CONFIRMING- Transportation 134.96 3,416.97

Supplies/Services 10243446 03/08/2017 Michelle M. Day 01-1999 Timesheet submitted late to payroll 647.84

10243447 03/08/2017 Gary L. Mueller 01-3712 Retiree Benefit/Medical Prem 979.03

Cap/CaIPERS Deducts/March 2017 10243448 03/08/2017 Stacy L. Young 01-1999 Timesheet received in payroll after payroll

run

1,936.67

10243669 03/09/2017 CAAAE Black Students of Calif United 01-5800 Field Trip Expense 975.00

10243670 03/09/2017 Cerebellum Corporation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 551.73

10243671 03/09/2017 City of Stockton 01-5510 Utility Water/Sewer 3,069.39

10243672 03/09/2017 CUE Cancelled Travel/Conference 390.00 *

Cancelled on 03/31/2017 10243673 03/09/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 3,716.89

Custodial Supplies/Equipment Repairs 504.89

Custodial/Instructional Supplies 869.49 5,091.27

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE tl;N I NE'




•


Checks Dated 0212712017 through 04/09/2017



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243674 03/09/2017 Jostens Inc 01-5800 Customization Services/Supplies 53.35

10243675 03/09/2017 JoyLabz LLC 01-4310 Admin Supplies 2,062.32

10243676 03/09/2017 K&M Signs 01-5800 Customized Services 117.18



10243678 03/09/2017 Really Good Stuff Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 289.10


10243679 03/09/2017 Republic Services #208 01-5570 Disposal Service 13,962.36

10243680 03/09/2017 SJC ACSA 01-5222 Travel/Conference 72.00

10243681 03/09/2017 Leslie J. Agostlni 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Health Svcs/Jan 5-Feb 23 181.65

10243682 03/09/2017 Paul S. Bennett 01-5222 Dreamers Summit/SHS/Feb 24/Final 39.54

10243683 03/09/2017 Allison J. Birakos 01-5220 CADA 2017 Conf/LHS/Mar 1-4/Final 968.03

10243684 03/09/2017 Daniel P. Bourcier 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/DO Induction Coord/Oct 38.45

19-Nov 16 2016 01-5222 Yr 5 Submission Induction 84.36 122.81

Requirements/Comp Ed/Feb 24/Final 10243685 03/09/2017 Joyce K. Braitman 01-5222 Yr 5 Submission Induction 19.20

Requirements/Comp Ed/Feb 24/Final 10243686 03/09/2017 Steven L. Clark 01-5222 ESS Breakfast @ SJCOE/SHS/Feb 23/Reg 84.00

Fee 10243687 03/09/2017 Larry A. Cook 01-5222 History-Social Science Conf/Calla/Mar 190.81

3/Final

10243688 03/09/2017 Troy M. Fast 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/MHS/Feb 21-22/Final 128.10

10243689 03/09/2017 Jillian M. Friend 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Feb 7-24 206.45

10243690 03/09/2017 Bradley W. Harrison 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/WRHS/Feb 229.88

21-22/Final 10243691 03/09/2017 Sherrie L. Jamero 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/Woodward/Feb 57.99

21-22/Final 10243692 03/09/2017 Shelley S. Kulm 01-5210 Mileage Relmb/Spec Ed/Dec 6- Feb 15 68.91

10243693 03/09/2017 Raul E. Mora 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/EUHS/Feb 117.88

21-22/Final 10243694 03/09/2017 Steven V. Moretto 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/Comp Ed/Feb 126.97

21-22/Final 10243695 03/09/2017 Marie E. Olives 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Read 180 Teacher Split 76.93

Sites/Dec 1- Jan 27 10243696 03/09/2017 Fallon N. Phillips 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Program Coord/Nov 4- Jan 14.89

31

10243697 03/09/2017 Kathleen M. Ruble 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Sec Ed/Jan 12- Feb 27 184.83

I ESCAPE



ONLINE Page 16 of 55



ReqPayl 2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243697 03/09/2017 Kathleen M. Ruble 01-5220 HOSA 2017 Conf/Sec Ed/Mar 16-19/Adv 192.00 376.83

Perdiem 10243698 03/09/2017 Ernest L. Williams 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Jan 26- Feb 22 197.36

10243699 03/09/2017 Andrea C. Wright 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Read 180 Teacher Split 40.13

Sites/Feb 1-28 10243700 03/09/2017 Crystal Creamery Dept 33369 13-4710 010 - Milk/Other Dairy 5,481.68

040 - Milk/Other Dairy 5,381.46







650 - Milk/Other Dairy 2,042.59 700 - Milk/Other Dairy 1,265.73

750 - Milk/Other Dairy 1,795.88 35,697.42

10243701 03/09/2017 Danielsen Company Inc, The 13-4710 010 - Program Food 2,934.45

040 - Program Food 825.85

070 - Program Food 1,063.61 190 - Program Food 1,669.23

270 - Program Food 1,857.19






750 - Program Food 1,224.48 13,054.88

10243702 03/09/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 13-4710 010 - Food 284.80


190 - Food 829.65

270 - Food 1,331.40

420 - Food 707.85

600.- Food 377.20

620 - Food 889.70

700 - Food 285.10

750 - Food 538.65 5,469.05

10243703 03/09/2017 American Floor Mats 01-4310 Admin Supplies 806.65



ESCAPE

ONLiOE

Page 17 of 55


ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243704 03/09/2017 Calif Financial Services 25-5800 Outside Services- 9,000.00

77-5800 Outside Services 4,750.00

78-5800 Outside Services 4,750.00


81-5800 Outside Services 4,750.00 23,682.44

10243705 03/09/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies


10243706 03/09/2017 Clutch & Brake Xchange Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 173.59

10243707 03/09/2017 Creative Bus Sales Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies/Vehicle Repair 5,288.44

10243708 03/09/2017 Demco Inc 01-4310 Library Supplies 135.26

10243709 03/09/2017 G&K Services 01-5580 978 - Uniform Service 675.49

10243710 03/09/2017 Hawthorne Educational Svcs Inc 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Book 141.38

01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Book 187.05



Farm Supplies 303.89


IT Supplies 12.84


13-4310 978 - Supplies 41.86 1,717.14

10243712 03/09/2017 Lakeshore Learning Materials 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 997.34

10243713 03/09/2017 Les Schwab Tire Center 01-5670 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 33.00



Library Supplies 1,126.10 3,698.88

10243715 03/09/2017 PG&E 01-5520 UTILITIES GAS ELECTRIC SERVICE 14,778.67

10243716 03/09/2017 Wayne Huit Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies/Services 92.28

10243717 03/09/2017 Charles G. Austin 01-3712 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 314,70

10243718 03/09/2017 Joshua P. Bowers 01-5220 CETPA 2016 Conf/IT/Nov 8-11/Final 64.00

01-5222 Successful Project Mgmt Conf/IT/Feb 38.40 102.40

15-16/Final 10243719 03/09/2017 Cheryl A. Brown Herkenrath 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 365.40

10243720 03/09/2017 Judy A. Cambra 01-3712 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 10.29

10243721 03/09/2017 Kathryn C. Cambra 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/IT/Feb 21-22/Final 270.88

01-5222 Successful Project Mgmt Conf/IT/Feb 38.40 309.28

15-16/Final 10243722 03/09/2017 Colby 0. Clark 01-5220 Illuminate 2017 Conf/IT/Feb 21-22/Final 74.90

10243723 03/09/2017 Dale W. Cretser 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 208.11

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the receding Checks be approved.

ESCAPE

ONLINE

Page 18 of 55


Red Pay '1 2c Board Report


Check Number

Check Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object Comment

Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10243724 03/09/2017 Stephanie A. Cretser 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 208.11 10243725 03/09/2017 Elizabeth S. Culvahouse 01-3711 Medicar Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 208.11 10243726 03/09/2017 Nathalie M. Guerrero 01-5222 Successful Project Mgmt Conf/IT/Feb 38.40

15-19/Final 10243h7 03/09/2017 Carolyn J. Herbst Rooney 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 121.80 10243728 03/09/2017 Harold M. Hughes 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 2,217.00 10243729 03/09/2017 Satinder Kaur 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Feb 14-28 48.69 10243730 03/09/2017 Ronald Mariano 01-5220 CETPA 2016 Conf/IT/Nov 8-11/Final 64.00

01-5222 Successful Project Mgmt Conf/IT/Feb 38.40 102,40 15-16/Final

10243731 03/09/2017 Edwin E. Newburg Jr 01-3711 Medicar Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 118.11 10243732 03/09/2017 Ada J. Queirolo 01-3712 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 314.70 10243733 03/09/2017 Jean L. Roberts Tomek 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 208.11

10243734 03/09/2017 Debra R. Ruger 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Br Elliott/Jan 6- Feb 23 106.09 2017

10243735 03/09/2017 Brenda S. Rushing Parrott 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 118.11

10243736 03/09/2017 Laura Solorio 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Feb 1-28 92.50 10243737 03/09/2017 Jean L. Thut 01-3712 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 165.92

10243738 03/09/2017 Barbara Utting 01-3711 Medicare Relmb/July-Sept 2016 365.40

Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 365.40 730.80

10243739 03/09/2017 Robert S. Winter 01-3711 Medicare Reimb/Oct-Dec 2016 369.00 10243740 03/09/2017 Richard Yanez 01-5220 CETPA 2016 Conf/IT/Nov 8-11/Final 64.00

10243741 03/09/2017 AP by the Sea 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,600.00

10243742 03/09/2017 AT&T 01-5940 Utility - Telephone Service 6,964.57

10243743 03/09/2017 AUS West Lockbox 01-5600 Rental Services 30.40

10243744 03/09/2017 CaISPRA Awards Program Chair Placer County Office of 01-5222 Travel/Conference 867.00

Ed 10243745 03/09/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 01-4400 Technology Equipment 930.94

10243746 03/09/2017 Economy Signs 01-5800 Customization Services 180.00 10243747 03/09/2017 EHD 01-5800 Fees 5,688.00

10243748 03/09/2017 Event Pros Productions 01-5800 Contract Services 995.55

10243749 03/09/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 292.18

10243750 03/09/2017 Jones School Supply 01-4310 Student Incentives 232.16




10243752 03/09/2017 Robin Dragoo 01-5800 Contract Services 250.00

10243753 03/09/2017 Safety Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 119.81


ESCAPE Page 19 of 55

Generated for Susan Mathern (SUSANMA45), Apr 10 2017 8:19AM 045 - Manteca Unified School District



ESCAPE

Page 20 of 55



Check Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Number

Check Amount


10243754 03/09/2017 South San Joaquin Educ Center 01-5100 Outside Services 8,705.78

10243755 03/09/2017 Sparkfun Electronics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,135.54


10243756 03/09/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4200 Books 391.91

01-4310 Admin Supplies 297.13



10243757 03/09/2017 Teacher Created Resources 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 104.72

10243758 03/09/2017 The Basix 01-5800 Customization Services 246.56

10243759 03/09/2017 Vertlv Operating Company 01-9320 Replenish Stores 20,832.06

10244035 03/10/2017 AccuTrain Corporation 01-5220 Travel/Conference 880.00

10244036 03/10/2017 City of Manteca-Finance Dept 01-5800 CONFIRMING - Outside Service 200.00

CONFIRMING-Outside Services 100.00 300.00

10244037 03/10/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 01.4310 Admin Supplies 1,722.24

Instructional Equipment/Supplies 20.06

Technology Equipment/Supplies 238.68

01-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 1,290.88

Technology Equipment/Supplies 649.73 3,921.59



10244040 03/10/2017 IEC Power LLC 01-6210 New Construction 5,610.50

10244041 03/10/2017 Nor Cal Fire Equipment 01-5600 Transportation Supplies/Services 1,859.29

10244042 03/10/2017 Perma-Bound 01-4200 Books 1,064.38

10244043 03/10/2017 Ray's Radio Shop Inc 01-5660 Admin Supplies/Equipment Repairs 66.59


10244045 03/10/2017 Robert Cox 01-5800 Mileage Reimbursement 138.96

10244046 03/10/2017 School Administrators Publishing Company 01-4200 Admin Books 109.22


10244047 03/10/2017 United Inspection Inc 21-6282 Outside Services/Golden West 8,025.00

Outside Services/Shasta 2,525.00 10,550.00

10244048 03/10/2017 Valley Community Counseling Services 01-5100 Contract Services 141,017.50

10244049 03/10/2017 Adorama 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 286.86


10244050 03/10/2017 AUS West Lockbox 01-5580 Towel Service 27.00

10244051 03/10/2017 B&H Photo-Video Remittance Processing Center 09-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 255.78

09-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 814.54


ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

Unpaid Sales Tax 86.12- 984.20 10244052 03/10/2017 Barnes & Noble Inc 01-4200 Books 54.01 10244053 03/10/2017 BMI Educational Services 01-4200 Books 214.48


10244054 03/10/2017 BSN Sports 01-4310 Athletic Supplies 3,660.40

Instructional Supplies 865,90 4,526.30


10244056 03/10/2017 City Of Lathrop 01-5510 Utility Water/Sewer 7,249.22 10244057 03/10/2017 City of Stockton - Finar Revenue Services Division 01-5510 Utility Sewer Chgs based on student ADA 3,915.36

10244058 03/10/2017 EAN Services LLC 01-5220 Travel/Conference 159.28


10244060 03/10/2017 F&H Construction 21-6210 Construction Services/Golden West 12,501.64

10244061 03/10/2017 Flora Fresh Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 53.42 10244062 03/10/2017 Glendale Parade Store 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 402.92


10244063 03/10/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 47.87


Instructional Supplies/Books 7.54


10244064 03/10/2017 IBUYPOWER 09-4400 Technology Equipment 4,233.75


10244065 03/10/2017 Mailfinance 01-5610 Equipment Lease 709.81

10244066 03/10/2017 Speech Therapy Associates 01-5100 Contract Services 11,681.25



10244068 03/10/2017 US Games 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 162.91

10244383 03/13/2017 Cummins Pacific LLC 01-5800 License Renewal 450.00

10244384 03/13/2017 IEC Power LLC 01-5600 Facility Improvement 217,686.98

10244385 03/13/2017 LDA Partners LLP 21-6281 Architect Fees/Sequoia ES 4,009.62

10244386 03/13/2017 Manteca Auto Parts 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 13.08

10244387 03/13/2017 Merced County Office of Education Instr Svcs 01-5222 Travel/Conference 50.00


10244389 03/13/2017 National Aquatic Services Inc 01-5660 Maintenance Repairs 5,420.50

10244390 03/13/2017 NCS Pearson Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 404.27

10244391 03/13/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 1,428.73


10244392 03/13/2017 Old McGowan's Feed Store 01-4310 Farm Supplies 470.35


ESCAPE ONILIN't" Page 21 of 55





Chedk Check Number Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Amount



10244394 03/13/2017 Tamara L. Basepayne 01-5220 NSTA National Conf/WRHS/Mar 29-Apr 256.00

1/Adv Perdiem

10244395 03/13/2017 Jodi L. Beaty 01-5220 NTSA National Conf/WRHS/Mar 29-Apr 256.00

1/Adv Perdiem

10244396 03/13/2017 Jenala C. Cano 01-5220 CADA 2017 Conf/EUHS/Mar 1-4/Final 227.22

10244397 03/13/2017 Tonya F. Despain 01-5220 CABE 2017 conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 29-Apr 172.80

1/Adv Perdiem

10244398 03/13/2017 Crystal L. Fielder 01-5220 CABE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 29-Apr 172.80

1/Adv Perdiem

10244399 03/13/2017 Marcia R. Finke 01-5220 CABe 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 29-Apr 172.80

1/Adv Perdiem

10244400 03/13/2017. Christina A. Jones 01-5220 CADA 2017 Conf/LHS/Mar 1-4/Final 72.23

10244401 03/13/2017 Matthew L. O'Donnell 01-5220 NTSA National Conf/WRHS/Mar 29-Apr 256.00

1/Adv Perdiem 10244402 03/13/2017 Denise R. Runyan 01-5220 CADA 2017 Conf/EUHS/Mar 1-4/Final 113.92

10244403 03/13/2017 David L. Silveira 01-5220 CABE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 29-Apr 172.80

1/Adv Perdiem 10244404 03/13/2017 Jeneva M. Spencer 01-5220 CABE 2017 Conf/Lathrop elem/Mar 29-Apr 172.80

1/Adv Perdlem

10244405 03/13/2017 Joseph R. Verderame 01-5220 NTSA National Conf/WRHS/Mar 29-apr 256.00

2/Adv Perdiem

10244406 03/13/2017 Troy M. White 01-5220 NSTA National Conf/MHS/Mar 29-Apr 1/Adv 256.00

Perdiem

10244514 03/14/2017 A&A Portables Inc 01-5610 Maintenance Rentals 1,485.75


10244516 03/14/2017 BR Funsten - Tom Duffy Co Dept #34426 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 58.58

10244517 03/14/2017 BusWest LLC 01-4310 Transportation Supplies/Vehicle Repairs 1,550.15

10244518 03/14/2017 Buttes/Center State Pipe & Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,891.07

10244519 03/14/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-5610 Transportation Supplies/Tank Rental 8.96

10244520 03/14/2017 CCHAT Center Sacramento 01-5800 Outside Services 2,156.00

10244521 03/14/2017 Contract Coating Corp 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 2,391.23

10244522 03/14/2017 DA Parrish & Sons Inc 01-5600 Maintenance Repairs 1,088.00

10244523 03/14/2017 Edges Electrical Group LLC Attn: Accts Receivable 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,874.11


10244525 03/14/2017 Hotsy Pacific 01-5660 Trans Equipment Repairs/Supplies 839.25


10244526 03/14/2017 I C Electronics Inc 01-5600 CONFIRMING - Maintenance Repairs 240.00

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the I ESCAPE

ONLINE



ReqPayl2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10244527 03/14/2017 Johnstone Supply 01-5222 CONFIRMING Travel/Conference 100.00

10244528 03/14/2017 Les Schwab Tire Center 01-4390 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 1,638.19 10244529 03/14/2017 Lincoln Aquatics Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,191.79


10244531 03/14/2017 Orbach Huff Suarez & Henderson 01-5810 Legal Services 32,333.43 10244532 03/14/2017 Ricoh USA Inc 01-5610 Equipment Lease/Services 3,275.33

01-5800 Equipment Lease/Services 6,861.54 10,136.87 10244533 03/14/2017 Standard Plumbing Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 242.94

10244534 03/14/2017 Stockton Fence & Material Co 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,025.91 10244535 03/14/2017 Tri-Signal Integration Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 305.99

10244536 03/14/2017 United Refrigeration Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,837.02

10244537 03/14/2017 USAirconditioning 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 1,243.82

10244538 03/14/2017 Wenger Corporation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,391.66

10244539 03/14/2017 Advanced Chemical Transport 01-5800 Hazardous Waste Services/Supplies 5,232.87 10244540 03/14/2017 B&H Photo-Video Remittance Processing Center 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 784.34

01-4400 Instructional Supplies 6,061.92


10244541 03/14/2017 Frank R. Bono 01-5220 McDonalds All American Game/MHS/Mar 348.20

26-30/Adv Perdiem 10244542 03/14/2017 Victoria J. Brunn 01-5222 CALSPRA Conf/COIP/Mar 2-4/Fnal 162.60

10244543 03/14/2017 Elizabeth P. Bugarin 01-5222 CALSPRA conf/COIP/Mar 2-4/Final 134.60


10244545 03/14/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 358.42

Instructional Supplies 464.95 823.37

10244546 03/14/2017 Anthony M. Chapman 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/SHS/Dec 22- Mar 4 427.04

10244547 03/14/2017 Children's Home Of Stockton 01-5100 Outside Services 17,955.61

10244548 03/14/2017 Crest/Good Mfg Co 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 771.25

10244549 03/14/2017 Demco Inc 01-4310 Library Supplies 292.44

10244550 03/14/2017 Eaton Interpreting Svcs Inc 01-5100 Contract Services 6,710.00

10244551 03/14/2017 Edges Electrical Group LLC Attn: Accts Receivable 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 261.84

10244552 03/14/2017 Peter N. Gale 01-5222 CALSPRA Conf/COIP/Mar 2-4/Final 154.60

10244553 03/14/2017 Janeen M. George 01-5222 Delta Collaboration Day/MHS/Feb 24/Fnal 23.54

10244554 03/14/2017 Greater Yosemite Council Boy Scouts of America 01-5300 Membership Fees 480.00

10244555 03/14/2017 Nancy T. Leal 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/School Readiness/First 60.88

5/Jan 4-Feb 23 10244556 03/14/2017 Andrew M. Lee 01-5220 Educating for Careers/MHS/Mar 5-7/Final 106.58

10244557 03/14/2017 Ericka L. Meadows 01-5220 Illuminate Coni/Woodward/Feb 21-22/Final 179.81


ESCAPE

.ft•N`L'i '

Page 23 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017


Check Amount

10244558 03/14/2017 James M. Mesimer 01-5220 Illuminate Conf/MHS/Feb 5.00

21-22/Trolley/Final 10244559 03/14/2017 Robert H. Orr 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/PE Teacher/Split Sites/Aug 414.71

4- Dec 9 10244560 03/14/2017 Robert Cox 01-5800 Mileage Reimbursement 154.40

10244561 03/14/2017 Elyce L Ruble 01-5222 Latino Family Literacy Project/MHS/Mar 21.76

8/Final 10244562 03/14/2017 United Refrigeration Inc 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 104.62


979 - Supplies 349.10 31,641.63

10244564 03/14/2017 Discount Ag Parts Manteca Inc 13-4310 978 - Ag Supplies 43.48

10244565 03/14/2017 Gold Star Foods Inc 13-4710 979 - Food 115,542.16

10244566 03/14/2017 Johnstone Supply 13-4310 978 -Supplies 325.41

10244567 03/14/2017 Lorman Education Services 13-5800 Webinar Fee 99.00

10244568 03/14/2017 Sonitrol 13-5800 600 - Maintenance Agreement 330.00

620 - Maintenance Agreement 1,119.00

650 - Maintenance Agreement 729.39


979 - Maintenance Agreement 71,61 2,538.00



10244570 03/14/2017 Academic Innovations LLC 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 93.84

01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books 3,268.05 3,361.89

10244571 03/14/2017 Cassye Spencer 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 135.12

10244572 03/14/2017 Central Valley Autism Project 01-5100 Contract Services 17,668.75


10244574 03/14/2017 First Call 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 43.27

10244575 03/14/2017 ON - Wilco Inc. 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 923.23

10244576 03/14/2017 Jones School Supply 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 441.85


10244577 03/14/2017 L&M Sales 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 340.99

Unpaid Sales Tax .79 341.78

10244578 03/14/2017 Lakeshore Learning Materials 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 365.80

Unpaid Sales Tax 1.49 367.29

10244579 03/14/2017 LDA Partners LLP 22-6281 Architectural & Engineering Services/MHS 1,100.00

CTE AG 10244580 03/14/2017 Lynn Card Company Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 62.73

10244581 03/14/2017 Nor-Cal Battery Co 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 44.52

ONLINE' The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE



Page 24 of 55

ReqPayl2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10244582 03/14/2017 NSPRA 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,390.00

10244583 03/14/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 198.23

10244584 03/14/2017 Perma-Bound 01-4200 Library Books 18.85


10244586 03/14/2017 School Health Corporation 01-4310 Admin Supplies 2,366.36

Unpaid Sales Tax 5.14 2,371.50

10244587 03/14/2017 Tri Services & Sales 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repair 162.00 10244588 03/14/2017 Bills Mower & Saw 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 1,066.15

01-5660 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 1,196.46 2,262.61

10244589 03/14/2017 FedEx 01-5920 Outgoing shipping charges 18.36 10244590 03/14/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 121.57

Custodial/Instructional Supplies 533.35


13-4310 978 - Supplies 162.69 1,111.78

10244591 03/14/2017 Interstate Truck Center 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repair 673.24

10244592 03/14/2017 Manteca Auto Parts 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 1,887.27

10244593 03/14/2017 Mission Linen Supply 09-5580 Outside Services 277.55



09-4310 Instructional Supplies 305.90 2,083.64

10244595 03/14/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 166.86 Admin Supplies 817.60


67-4310 Admin Supplies 13.39 5,826.07



10244598 03/14/2017 Riso Products of Sacramento 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 635.37

01-5640 Maintenace Agreement 22.34

Maintenance Agreement 494.17 1,151.88

10244599 03/14/2017 Cal Traffic 13-5800 978- Customization Service 156.96

10244600 03/14/2017 Comfort Air Inc 13-6500 CONFIRMING - 600 - Equipment 11,756.00

Replacement 10244601 03/14/2017 Bryan K. Ehrenholm 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 89.65

10244602 03/14/2017 Focus Packaging & Supplies 13-4310 979 - Supplies 670.25

10244603 03/14/2017 Hayes Distributing 13-4710 979 - Food 11,208.30

10244604 03/14/2017 P&R Paper Supply Co 13-4310 979 - Supplies for School Lunch Program 19,037.37

10244605 03/14/2017 Pams Lunchroom LIG 13-5800 978 - Fee 3,348.11

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the I ESCAPE L preceding Checks be approved. Page 25 of 55



ReqPay12c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/0912017

Fund-Object Comment


Expensed Check

Amount Amount Check Date Pay to the Order of

10244606 03/14/2017 PG&E 13-5520 Whse utilities for Feb 2017 892.06

10244607 03/14/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 13-4710 979 - Food 30,287.20

10244608 03/14/2017 Steve Kim 13-8634 Presales refund: student left MUSD 81.00


040 Food 986.30

070 Food 957.36

270 Food 784.16

600 Food 243.19

620 Food 254.04

700 Food 222.11

750 Food 411.38

979 - Program Food 46,351.20 50,692.70

10244610 03/14/2017 Van Unen/Mlersma Propane 13-4310 979 - Supplies 8.00

10244798 03/15/2017 Home Depot-Maintenance Acct #6035-3225-0399-9090 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 3,183.77

10244799 03/15/2017 Gold Star Foods Inc 13-4710 040 - Food 342.70

070 - Food 594.80

420 - Food 248.58

600 - Food 295.80

620 - Food 304.50

650 - Food 537.66

700 - Food 475.02 2,799.06

10244800 03/15/2017 Sandra L. Helsel 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 47.19

10244801 03/15/2017 Jennifer N. Lew-Vang 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 46.65

10244802 03/15/2017 Lockhart Seeds 13-4310 978 - Ag Supplies 222,76

10244803 03/15/2017 Maria Padella 13-8634 Presales refund: student left MUSD 171.00

10244804 03/15/2017 National Restaurant Association Solutions 13-4310 978-Admin Supplies 2,078.81

10244805 03/15/2017 Paramount Pest Control 13-5515 650 - Pest Control 35.00

979 - Pest Control 70.00 105.00

10244806 03/15/2017 Cynthia D. Rebeiro 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 71.10


040 - Food 947.05


190 - Food 816.40

270 - Food 852.05

420 - Food 1,444.80

600 - Food 416.25

620 - Food 1,569.10



045 - Manteca Unified School District Generated for Susan Mathern (SUSANMA45), Apr 10 2017 B: 19AM

RedPayl2c

Board Report


Check ' Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount


700 - Food 546.05

750 - Food 1,330.55 11,733.10

10244808 03/15/2017 Joyce A. Rubalcaba 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 46.87


10244810 03/15/2017 Watts Equipment Company Inc 13-5660 979 - Equipment Service and Repair 327.89

10244811 03/15/2017 Annastacia M. Yager 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 57.51

10244812 03/15/2017 Kristy D, Angove 01-5222 Counselor Collaborative Day/SHS/FEb 14.50

24/Mileage/Final 10244813 03/15/2017 Delta Charter Service 01-5824 Outside Transportation 1,239.00


10244815 03/15/2017 Eric Armin Inc 01-4310 Instructinal Supplies 114.13


10244816 03/15/2017 Rachelle M. Fast 01-5220 CADA Conf/SHS/Mar 1-4/Final 55.96 10244817 03/15/2017 Fastenal Company 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 154.48

10244818 03/15/2017 Floral Supply Syndicate-Adm 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 145.87

10244819 03/15/2017 Valerie M. Flores 01-5220 Educating for Careers Conf/SHS/Mar 463.25

5-7/Final 10244820 03/15/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 189.41




10244822 03/15/2017 Jeffrey C. Greene 01-5220 CADA Conf/SHS/Mar 1-4/Final 245.84

10244823 03/15/2017 Melissa G. Harbison 01-5220 CADA Conf/SHS/Mar 1-4/Final 213.54

10244824 03/15/2017 Ingram & Brauns Musik Shoppe 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 2,040.90

10244825 03/15/2017 Jennifer N. Lew-Vang 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Health Services/Feb 2-27 50.13

10244826 03/15/2017 Suzanne R. McCreath 01-5220 MISL Training/Fr Camp/Mar 2-3/final 1,108.08

10244827 03/15/2017 Miklaus Moore Sports Svc 01-5800 Outside Services 7,034.00

10244828 03/15/2017 Sara K. Russell 01-5220 CADA Conf/SHS/Mar 1-4/Final 55.96

10244829 03/15/2017 Storer Coachways 01-5824 Outside Transportation 1,344.95

10244830 03/15/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 01-4310 Admin Supplies 992.79


10244832 03/15/2017 Fresno Convention & Entertainment Center 01-5800 Fieldtrip Expense 120.00

10244833 03/15/2017 Hampton Inn & Suites Clovis Airport N 01-5800 Field Trip Expense 3,617.46

10244834 03/15/2017 Home Depot-Grounds Acct #6035-3225-0399-9108 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 407.98



Maintenance Supplies 411.04






I ESCAPE


ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board

Comment

Meeting Date 04/18/2017

Check Number


Expense Amoun

Check Amount

10244835 03/15/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 225.62 970.02

10244836 03/15/2017 Ruxandra M. Manu 01-5220 PENT 2017 Conf/Spec Ed/Feb 28- Mar 474.76

1/Final

10244837 03/15/2017 Katie R. McCreery 01-5220 Nat'l Title I 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Feb 1,525.96

22-24/Fnal

10244838 03/15/2017 Mlklaus Moore Sports Svc 01-5800 Outside Services 6,243.00

10244839 03/15/2017 Paul M. Ouellette 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Jan 27- Feb 16 120.72


10244841 03/15/2017 University Square Hotel Fresno 01-5800 Field Trip Expense 1,944.36

10244842 03/15/2017 AT&T 01-5800 Utility 143.92

10244843 03/15/2017 Comcast 01-5941 Utility 51,987.15

01-5944 Utility 3,790.73 55,777.88

10244844 03/15/2017 JM Equipment 11-5800 Contract Services 875.00

10244845 03/15/2017 Ricoh USA Inc 01-5610 Equipment Lease 9,589.97

01-5640 2015/2016 CONFIRMING - Maintenance 5,634.99

Agreement 09-5610 Equipment Lease 162.38

11-5610 Equipment Lease 147.22

13-5610 Equipment Lease 177.82 15,712.38

10244846 03/15/2017 Ronnie C. Tiscareno 01-1999 Department did not submit timesheet to

payroll

370.86

10244847 03/15/2017 All In One Poster Company 01-4310 Admin Supplies 577.71

13-4310 Admin Supplies 385.16


10244848 03/15/2017 Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo 01-5810 Legal Services 5,912.82


10244850 03/15/2017 Eryn E. Bowers 01-5220 CADA 2017 Conf/EUHS/Mar 1-4/Final 109.96

10244851 03/15/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-5610 Equipmental Rental/Supplies 67.20


13-4310 978 - Supplies 277.15 524.70

10244853 03/15/2017 Crivelli's Shirts & More 01-5800 Customization Services 536.88

10244854 03/15/2017 Data Management Inc 01-5800 Customization Services 565.32


10244855 03/15/2017 David Shaw 01-5800 CONFIRMING - Contract Services 275.00

10244856 03/15/2017 Lesley A. Fontanilla 01-5220 Title I 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Feb 22-24/Final 1,547.50



10244858 03/15/2017 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co. 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 803.76




ESCAPE Page 29 of 55

ReqPayl2c

Board Report



Board Meeting Date 04118/2017

Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10244859 03/15/2017 Interim Staffing Modesto 01-5100 Contract Services 1,340.00 10244860 03/15/2017 Johnstone Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 3,086.43

10244861 03/15/2017 Suzanne R. McCreath 01-5220 Title I 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Feb 22-24/Final 1,701.47


Instructional Supplies/Equipment 248.33

01-6400 Instructional Supplies/Equipment 6,487.23 6,924.04

10244863 03/15/2017 Remedia Publications 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 247.80


Unpaid Sales Tax 39.42- 477.87 10244864 03/15/2017 Riso Products of Sacramento 01-5640 Maintenance Agreement 56.08

10244865 03/15/2017 Spinelli Donald & Nott 67-5810 Legal Services 1,835.00

10244866 03/15/2017 Anjanette L. Stevenson 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Oct 31- Mar 9 577.84

10244867 03/15/2017 Jennifer D. Taylor 01-5220 Title I 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Feb 22-24/Final 1,631.60

10244868 03/15/2017 The Latino Family Literacy Project 01-5222 Travel/Conference 200.00

10244869 03/15/2017 Therapeutic Pathways Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 3,025.43

10245384 03/17/2017 Danielsen Company Inc, The 13-4710 010 - Program Food 998.74 040 - Program Food 2,956.44


190 - Program Food 1,894.43 270 - Program Food 2,505.44





750 - Program Food 1,486.87 16,399.54

10245385 03/17/2017 Maria Morales 13-8634 Presales refund: status change 26.00


10245387 03/17/2017 Sysco of Central Calif 13-4710 010 Food 3,979.22

040 Food 2,112.14

070 Food 1,580.11

190 Food 6,390.09

270 Food 4,989.64

420 Food 280.55

600 Food 490.09

620 Food 1,178.60

650 Food 263.64

750 Food 26.25- 21,237.83



The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE ONLINE


ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object Comment


Check Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10245388 03/17/2017 Calif Welding Supply Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies/Tank Rental 163.48

10245389 03/17/2017 Clutch & Brake Xchange Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 276.69

10245390 03/17/2017 Glendale Parade Store 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 14.68


10245391 03/17/2017 Herc Rentals Inc 01-5610 Grounds Equipment Rentals 1,103.93


10245392 03/17/2017 Horizon 01-4310 Landscaping Supplies 1,588.45

10245393 03/17/2017 IEC Power LLC 01-5640 Maintenance Agreement 13,879.32

10245394 03/17/2017 JM Equipment 01-5660 Grounds Supplies/Equipment 168.00

Repairs/Inspections 10245395 03/17/2017 Jostens Inc 01-4310 CONFIRMING-Promotion Supplies 1,141.75


10245397 03/17/2017 Mc Coy Truck Tire Svc Center 01-4390 Transportation Tires/Supplies/Repairs 661.70

10245398 03/17/2017 McGraw-Hill School Education Holdings LLC 01-4200 Books 251.13




67-4310 Admin Supplies 7.42 2,660.76

10245401 03/17/2017 P&R Paper Supply Co 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 237.34

10245402 03/17/2017 Paramount Pest Control 01-5515 Grounds Pest Control Services/Supplies 130.00


10245404 03/17/2017 Portland DBT Institute Inc 01-5800 Contract Services 6,400.00

10245405 03/17/2017 Pre-Sort Center 01-5800 Outside Services 330.27

10245406 03/17/2017 Preferred Alliance Inc 01-5846 Outside Services 765.40

10245407 03/17/2017 Quality Service Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 494.00

10245408 03/17/2017 Riso Products of Sacramento 01-5640 Maintenance Agreement 97.17

10245409 03/17/2017 Rockier Woodworking And Hardware 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 605.03

10245410 03/17/2017 Rogue Fitness 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,181.59


10245411 03/17/2017 Standard Plumbing Supply 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 85.04

10245412 03/17/2017 Starfall Education Foundation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 31.66


10245413 03/17/2017 Super Duper Publications 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 269.15




10245415 03/17/2017 Wallace-Kuhl & Assoc 21-6282 Outside Services/Shasta 160.00



ReqPay12c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Number


Check Amount

10245415 03/17/2017 Wallace-Kuhl & Assoc 21-6283 Outside Services/Golden West 1,537.00

Outside Services/Lathrop 157.50

Outside Services/Lincoln 235.00 2,089.50

10245416 03/17/2017 Woodys Golf & Industrial Vehicles 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 443.07

10245417 03/17/2017 A Show of Hands 01-5100 Contract Services 12,217.50

10245418 03/17/2017 A&A Portables Inc 01-5600 Rental Agreement 145.66

01-5610 Equipment Rentals 337.79 483.45 10245419 03/17/2017 Barnes & Noble Inc 01-4200 Books 643.82

10245420 03/17/2017 Bouncin Bins 01-5800 Contract Services 575.00

10245421 03/17/2017 Buyquest 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 66.03


10245422 03/17/2017 CASP 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,060.00

10245423 03/17/2017 David Garcia 01-5800 Reimbursement 990.00

10245424 03/17/2017 Double Stitch 01-5800 Customization Services 952.60

10245425 03/17/2017 Far West Laboratories Inc 01-5883 Outside Services 120.00

10245426 03/17/2017 Fresh Ideas Flower Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 78.38

10245427 03/17/2017 Harvest Power Calif LLC 01-5570 Grounds Dumping Fees 96.56

10245428 03/17/2017 Herff Jones Inc 11-5800 Customization Services 43.88


10245430 03/17/2017 Houghton Mifflin }Harcourt Publishing Co. 01-4200 Books 249.85

10245431 03/17/2017 ISTE 01-5220 Travel/Conference 125.00

10245432 03/17/2017 Microsoft Corporation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 103.90

10245433 03/17/2017 North Valley School Lodi Campus-Div of Victor 01-5800 Outside Services 3,223.54

10245434 03/17/2017 PeopleAdmin Inc 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,500.00

10245435 03/17/2017 Raymus Homes 25-8681 Dev Fee Reimb/Sq ft reduction on parcel226-290-57 lot 139

413.28

10245436 03/17/2017 Raymus Homes 25-8681 Dev Fee Reimb/sq ft reduction on parcel 655.20

226-290-60 1ot142 10245437 03/17/2017 Raymus Homes 25-8681 Dev Fee Reimb/Sq ft reduction on

parcel226-330-01 lot 114

2,244.48

10245438 03/17/2017 Scholastic Book Fairs 01-4200 Books 4,261.42

10245439 03/17/2017 Jamie L. Gonzalez 01-5220 PeopleConnect Conf/Personnel/Apr 3-5/Adv 106.20

Perdiem 10245440 03/17/2017 Lorraine M. Lara 01-5220 PeopleConnect Conf/Personnel/Apr 3-5/Adv 106.20

Perdiem 10245441 03/17/2017 Sherry D. Scharmann 01-5220 PeopleConnect Conf/Personnel/Apr 3-5/Adv 106.20

Perdiem 10245638 03/20/2017 CDW Government 01-4310 Admin Supplies 926.19


ESCAPE Mkt10Er



ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object

Board Meeting Date


04/18/2017

Check Number


Check Amount

10245639 03/20/2017 City of Stockton 01-5800 Storm Drain/Fire Hydrant 1,411.82

Storm Drain/Firey Hydrant 503.60 1,915.42

10245640 03/20/2017 Curriculum Associates Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 82.91


10245642 03/20/2017 Floral Supply Syndicate-Adm 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,002.78


10245643 03/20/2017 Fredriks Nursery 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 599.95

10245644 03/20/2017 George Hills Company Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 346.00


10245646 03/20/2017 Ingram & Brauns Musik Shoppe 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 278.15

Instructional Supplies/Repairs 136.52 414.67

10245647 03/20/2017 Ingram & Brauns Musik Shoppe 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 185.98

10245648 03/20/2017 IPEVO Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 3,983.13

10245649 03/20/2017 J&J Printing 01-5803 Outside Printing Services 104.16

10245650 03/20/2017 Jostens Inc 01-4310 Promotion Supplies 2,286.40

10245651 03/20/2017 Miklaus Moore Sports Svc 01-5800 Outside Services 258.00

10245652 03/20/2017 Pacific Metro Electric Inc 01-5600 Outside Services 8,109.00

10245653 03/20/2017 Pioneer Drama Service 01-5800 Royalty Fees 375.00

10245654 03/20/2017 TETER LLP 21-6281 Architect Fees/Lincloln Elem 20,597.68

10245655 03/20/2017 VS Athletics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 209.54


10245656 03/20/2017 WOW On Wheels 01-5800 Contract Services 3,188.06



10245659 03/20/2017 Jeff P. Caligiuri 01-5220 NCSM Conf/Comp Ed/Apr 3-4/Adv Perdiem 179.20

NCTM Conf/Comp Ed/Apr 5-8/Adv Perdiem 256.00 435.20

10245660 03/20/2017 Neopost USA Inc 01-5930 Postage 55,000.00

10245835 03/21/2017 Central Region CATA c/o CA Dept of Ed 01-5222 CONFIRMING - Travel/Conference 90.00

01-5800 CONFIRMING - Travel/Conference 40.00 130.00

10245836 03/21/2017 Marina D. Crain 01-5222 D.I.R,T. Conf/Calla/Feb 14/Mileage/Final 17.23

10245837 03/21/2017 Shawna M. Denton 01-5222 CLS 2017 Conf/Gr Valley Feb 57.60

24-26/Perdiem/Final

10245838 03/21/2017 Economic & Planning Systems 77-5800 Outside Services 267.18



81-5800 Outside Services 267.18 1,068.75




ESCAPE ONLINE Page 32 of 55


ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10245840 03/21/2017 Eli R. Gibbs II 01-5222 CLS Conf/Gr Valley/Feb 57.60

24-26/Perdiem/Final 10245841 03/21/2017 Home Depot-Sites Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Warehouse Supplies 131.72

10245842 03/21/2017 Kamps Propane 01-4310 Warehouse Supplies 100.64

10245843 03/21/2017 Melissa L. King 01-5222 CLS Conf/Gr Valley/Feb 57.60

24-26/Perdiem/Final 10245844 03/21/2017 Rebecca L. Kinlaw 01-5222 CLS Conf/Gr Valley/Feb 57.60

24-26/Perdiem/Final 10245845 03/21/2017 Amber Land-Denoyer 11-5222 EL civics & Citizenship Conf/MAS/Mar 70.62

3/Mileage 10245846 03/21/2017 Nothing But Treats 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 375.00

10245847 03/21/2017 Karen W. Olsen 11-5222 EL Civics & Citizenship Conf/MAS/Mar 20.00

3/Registration 10245848 03/21/2017 Regal Signs 01-5800 Customization Services 86.17

10245849 03/21/2017 Scholastic Book Fairs 01-4200 Books 3,258.55

10245850 03/21/2017 Tri Valley Line X Inc 01-5660 Equipment Repair 1,349.25

10245851 03/21/2017 Ups 01-5920 Outgoing Freight 61.43

10245852 03/21/2017 Savannah L. Wegner 01-5220 Educating for Careers/N Vision/Mar 96.95

5-7/Final 10245853 03/21/2017 Crystal Creamery Dept 33369 13-4710 010 - Milk/Other Dairy 8,511.50









750 - Milk/Other Dairy 3,575.59 47,956.00

10246093 03/22/2017 Carmelite Roman 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67

10246094 03/22/2017 Christine Boaz 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67

10246095 03/22/2017 Claudia Vazquez 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67

10246096 03/22/2017 Lynda M. Donelson 01-5210 Mileage Feb 1-27 2017 99.19

10246097 03/22/2017 Esther Jackson 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67

10246098 03/22/2017 Fitguard Inc 01-5800 Contract Services 150.00

10246099 03/22/2017 Fonda D Morland 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67


10246101 03/22/2017 Gigli Hay Inc 01-4310 Farm Supplies 584.55


ESCAPE


ReqPayl2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount


Maintenance Supplies 60.68

Warehouse Supplies 51.96

01-9320 Replenish Stores 176.71 5,859.02 10246103 03/22/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 1,406.09



01-5660 Custodial Supplies/Equipment Repairs 990.80 2,843.83 10246104 03/22/2017 Bradley W. Harrison 01-5210 Mileage Feb 7-Mar 15 2017 149.80 10246105 03/22/2017 Jessica Reed 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246106 03/22/2017 Lisa Brown 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246107 03/22/2017 Lisa Christensen 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246108 03/22/2017 Mayte Pichardo 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246109 03/22/2017 Cheryl L. Meeker 01-5222 MISL Training Mar 15-16 2017 Final 182.42 10246110 03/22/2017 Mervat Altaian 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246111 03/22/2017 Molly Khounsy 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246112 03/22/2017 Nicole Moore 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 16.89 10246113 03/22/2017 Patricia Sanchez Medina 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 16.89 10246114 03/22/2017 Pauline Egli 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246115 03/22/2017 Point Break Adolescent Resources 01-5800 Contract Services 480.00 10246116 03/22/2017 Kathrine F. Puck 01-5210 Mileage Jan 9-Mar 3 2017 50.93 10246117 03/22/2017 Rocio Yvonne Razo 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246118 03/22/2017 Sonitrol 01-5800 Maintenance Agreement 1,455.00

Security System Monitoring 30,228.93

13-5800 600 - Maintenance Agreement 261.00

620 - Maintenance Agreement 594,00



979 - Maintenance Agreement 525.00 33,431.93 10246119 03/22/2017 Sparkfun Electronics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 557.97


10246120 03/22/2017 Stephanie Savage 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 50.67 10246121 03/22/2017 SYNCB/Am9zon 01-4310 Admin Supplies 97.32


Unpaid Sales Tax 144.34- 1,756.77 10246122 03/22/2017 Veterinary Service Inc 01-4310 Farm Supplies 419.17



ESCAPE ONLINE preceding Checks be approved. Page 34 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object

Board

Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246123 03/22/2017 Victoria Habiger 01-5800 Non-Employee Expense 16.89

10246124 03/22/2017 Wallace-Kuhl & Assoc 21-6283 Outside Services/Lathrop 3,655.00

Outside Services/Lincoln 780.00

22-6283 Testing Services/P39 MHS 4,536,72 8,971.72

10246125 03/22/2017 CAPCA 13-5222 Travel/Conference 140.00

10246126 03/22/2017 Crystal Creamery Dept 33369 13-4710 270 - Milk/Other Dairy 7,926.75

10246127 03/22/2017 DA Parrish & Sons Inc 13-5600 190 - Outside Services 250.00

10246128 03/22/2017 Grainger 13-4310 978 - Supplies 62.80

10246129 03/22/2017 Johnstone Supply 13-4310 978 -Supplies 1,074.10

10246130 03/22/2017 Jacqueline Meneses 13-5846 SOS Exam reimb 194.00

10246131 03/22/2017 Pacific Southwest Irrigation 13-4310 978 - Ag Supplies 603.73

10246132 03/22/2017 Rohrer Bros Inc 13-4710 979 - Food 1,437.60

10246133 03/22/2017 Slic Co-Op C/O Vallejo City Usd 13-5800 Administrative Fees 50.00

10246134 03/22/2017 Sysco of Central Calif 13-4710 979 - Program Food 62,513.09


10246136 03/22/2017 Utility Trailer Sales of Central Calif 13-4310 978 - Supplies 164.07

10246137 03/22/2017 Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,185.00

10246138 03/22/2017 Blick Art Materials 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 445.72

10246139 03/22/2017 CT Brayton & Sons Inc 01-6220 Construction Services/SHS CTE 43,450.00

21-6285 Construction Services/Lathrop ES 121,873.71 165,323.71


10246141 03/22/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 99.14


Instuctional Supplies 11.04 301.97


10246143 03/22/2017 Pacific Copy & Print Inc 01-5803 Outside Printing Services 956.93

Unpaid Sales Tax 2.21 959.14


10246145 03/22/2017 Scantron 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 259.91

10246146 03/22/2017 Securitas Security Svc USA 01-5800 Security Services 1,050.00

10246147 03/22/2017 Stockton Fence & Material Co 67-5600 BV Maintenance Repairs 1,560.00

10246148 03/22/2017 Tracy Sign Inc 01-4310 Admin Supplies 341.48


10246149 03/22/2017 Wolfe's Camera Shop 01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Equipment 1,376.49

01-4400 Instructional Supplies/Equipment 2,208.00




I ESCAPE



ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Check Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246150 03/22/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin/Instructional Supplies 517.26


Instructional Supplies/Equipment 81.56

IT Supplies 1,890.68

Printshop Supplies 216.23

01-4400 Instructional Supplies/Equipment 1,023.33 15,427.85

10246151 03/22/2017 PG&E 01-5520 UTLIITIES GAS ELECTRIC SERVICE 613.63

10246152 03/22/2017 Joanne R. Balestrerl 01-3711 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

717.87

10246153 03/22/2017 Margaret A. Barnett 01-3711 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

717.87

10246154 03/22/2017 Kelly D. Basile 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246155 03/22/2017 Debra J. Bear 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246156 03/22/2017 Donna F. Beck 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash 729.85

In Lieu/April 2017

10246157 03/22/2017 Susan E. Bloodgood 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246158 03/22/2017 Kari R. Brannon 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246159 03/22/2017 Sandra A. Cabrera 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246160 03/22/2017 Florence P. Campbell 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246161 03/22/2017 Tony C. Fortuny 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246162 03/22/2017 Debbie E. Freeman 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246163 03/22/2017 Judy G. Goo 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246164 03/22/2017 Barbara J. Grizzle 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246165 03/22/2017 Maureen L. Johnson 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

687.11

10246166 03/22/2017 Thomas E. Kaech 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246167 03/22/2017 Doreen E. Kahn 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

I ESCAPE





ReqPay12c

Board Report


Fund-Object


Check Number

Check Date Pay to the Order of Comment

Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246168 03/22/2017 Stephen W. Marleau 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246169 03/22/2017 Janet G. Mattfeld 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

687.11

10246170 03/22/2017 Barbara I. Neuman 01-3711 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

717.87

10246171 03/22/2017 JoAnn M. Parrish 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246172 03/22/2017 Jean C. Richardson 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246173 03/22/2017 Brenda A. Rohrer 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246174 03/22/2017 Kimberly D. Texeira 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246175 03/22/2017 Kathleen L. Ulibarri 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

687.11

10246176 03/22/2017 Cecelia M. Watts 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

729.85

10246177 03/22/2017 Russell D. Williams 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246178 03/22/2017 Shelley J. Williams 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56

10246179 03/22/2017 Denise L. Wong 01-3711 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

717.87

10246180 03/22/2017 Kimberley A. Zunino 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

829.56


10246182 03/22/2017 ACSA's Foundation for Educational Administration 01-5222 Travel/Conference 590.00

10246183 03/22/2017 AIKO K JONES 01-5800 COCA COLA SCHOLARSHIP 2016 300.00

10246184 03/22/2017 Anderson's 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,671.63



01-5600 Rental Services 30.40 58.38



10246188 03/22/2017 Bureau of Educ & Research Inc 01-5222 Travel/Conference 735.00

10246189 03/22/2017 Calif Sport Design 01-5800 Customization Services 1,011.33

10246190 03/22/2017 Center Appliance 01-4310 Admin Supplies 492.54

10246191 03/22/2017 Crivelli's Shirts & More 01-5800 Customization Services 661.43


preceding Checks be approved. Pap 37 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Check Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246192 03/22/2017 Curriculum Associates Inc 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 72.50


10246193 03/22/2017 D&J Rosa Welding 01-5660 Maintenance Supplies/Equipment Repairs 140.00

10246194 03/22/2017 Herff Jones Inc 01-4310 Graduation Supplies/Customization 2,404.51

Services 10246195 03/22/2017 Interstate Music Division of Cascio Music Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 335.91


10246196 03/22/2017 Jameco Electronics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 218.76


10246197 03/22/2017 Jones School Supply 01-4310 Student Incentives 604.76


10246198 03/22/2017 Kaduceus Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 3,500.00

10246199 03/22/2017 Kamps Propane 01-4310 Warehouse Supplies 36.52


10246201 03/22/2017 Perma-Bound 01-4200 Books 81.34

10246202 03/22/2017 Sparkfun Electronics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,108.10


10246203 03/22/2017 Stanislaus County Office of Education 01-5222 Travel/Conference 560.00

10246204 03/22/2017 TPH Architects 21-6281 Architect Fees/Shasta 14,795.00

10246205 03/22/2017 United Cerebral Palsy Of San Joaquin Calaveras & 01-5100 Contract Services 22,827.60

Amador 10246206 03/22/2017 Ups 01-5920 outgoing freight shipping charges 25.60

10246207 03/22/2017 Gary W. Brown 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Relmb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

479.03

10246208 03/22/2017 Gerald B. Brown 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

979.03

10246209 03/22/2017 Charles S. Christian 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

479.03

10246210 03/22/2017 Laurie M. Deboer 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

854.90

10246211 03/22/2017 Danell C. McCleary 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash 1,038.96

In Lieu/April 2017 10246212 03/22/2017 Gary L. Mueller 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

979.03

10246213 03/22/2017 Ada J. Queirolo 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

351.36

10246214 03/22/2017 Yvonne M. Rodrigues 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Relmb/Cash 351.36

In Lieu/April 2017





ReqPayl 2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246215 03/22/2017 Lynette Rogers 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

479.03

10246216 03/22/2017 Dana L. Strmiska 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in Lieu/April 2017

509.52

10246217 03/22/2017 Jean L. Thut 01-3712 Retiree Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash

in Lieu/April 2017

262.08

10246218 03/22/2017 Kathy M. Howe 01-3412 Board Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in 400.63

Lieu/April 2017 10246219 03/22/2017 R Evelyn Moore 01-3412 Board Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in 483.00

Lieu/April 2017 10246220 03/22/2017 Stephen J. Schluer 01-3412 Board Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in 612.00

Lieu/April 2017 10246221 03/22/2017 Nancy S. Telcheira 01-3412 Board Benefits/Medical Cap Reimb/Cash in 548.02

Lieu/April 2017 10246222 03/22/2017 Robert C. Wallace 01-3412 Board Benefits/Medical Cap Relmb/Cash In 687.11

Lieu/April 2017 10246223 03/22/2017 Angie M. Anaya 01-5220 LA/FIDM Per Diem 4/7-8/17 115.20

10246224 03/22/2017 Christopher P. Burr 01-5220 LA/FIDM Per Diem 4/7-8/17 115.20

10246225 03/22/2017 Dawny R. Everson 01-5220 Casbo 2017 Annual Conference Per Diem 153.60

4/12-15/17 10246226 03/22/2017 Samria J. Faria 01-5220 Casbo 2017 Annual Conference Per Diem 153.60

4/12-15/17 10246227 03/22/2017 Valerie M. Flores 01-5220 LA/FIDM Per Diem 4/7-8/17 115.20

10246228 03/22/2017 Fatima F. Ridoloso 01-5220 LA/FIDM Per Diem 4/7-8/17 115.20




10246602 03/24/2017 Hyatt Regency Sacramento 01-5220 Travel/Conference 343.60

10246603 03/24/2017 Lori E. Pellegrino-Jackson 01-5222 IEPI Dual Enrollment Workshop/Dec 1 131.32

2016/Final 10246604 03/24/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 2,297.59

Technology Supplies 21.13


10246605 03/24/2017 Suzan L. Turner 01-5210 Mileage/Sp Ed/Aug 29 2016-Mar 2 2017 436.15

10246606 03/24/2017 Anita M. Weimann 01-5210 Mileage/Sp Ed/Jan 6 - Feb 28 2017 197.74

10246607 03/24/2017 Acco Brands USA 01-4400 Instructional Equipment 1,487.64

01-9320 Replenish Stores 696.39 2,184.03

10246608 03/24/2017 Airgas USA LLC 01-5610 Equipment Rental/Supplies 20.60

10246609 03/24/2017 Barobo Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 8,589.44

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board preceding Checks be approved.

of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE

ONLINE'

Page 39 of 55



ReqPay12c

Board Report


Check Number

Check Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object ComMent

Expensed Amount

Check Amount


10246610 03/24/2017 CASAS 11-5220 Travel/Conference 2,475.00


10246612 03/24/2017 Floral Resources 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 329.73

10246613 03/24/2017 Home Depot-Sltes Acct #6035-3225-0399-9082 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 735.25


10246614 03/24/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 26.58

01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,691.98

Instructional Supplies/Books 34.21 1,752.77

10246615 03/24/2017 Ray's Radio Shop Inc 01-5660 CONFIRMING-Equipment Repairs 109.10


10246617 03/24/2017 Title Boxing 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 268.84


10246618 03/24/2017 Wenger Corporation 01-4400 Instructional Equipment 9,234.02

10246945 03/27/2017 Kathryn C. Cambra 01-5220 CUE conference/Mar 15-18 2017/Final 2,325.06

10246946 03/27/2017 City of Manteca-Finance Dept 01-5510 01-0000-0-0000-8200-5510-000-0000 206.27

Utility Water/Garbage/Sewer 26,898.27 27,104.54

10246947 03/27/2017 Ballard & Tighe Publishers 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 2,859.03

10246948 03/27/2017 Barnes & Noble Inc 01-4200 Admin Books 138.93

Books 985.70 1,124.63

10246949 03/27/2017 Calif Kids Day Care Inc 01-5100 Contract Services 36,002.56

10246950 03/27/2017 Campbell-Keller 01-4310 Admin Furniture 3,485,65

10246951 03/27/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Classroom Supplies 434.89


10246952 03/27/2017 CASCWA Delta Sierra Section 01-5220 Travel/Conference 165.00

10246953 03/27/2017 Condor Earth Technologies Inc 25-5800 Outside Services 9,392,62

10246954 03/27/2017 Davis Demographics and Planning Inc 25-5800 Outside Services 6,120.00

10246955 03/27/2017 Dynatorch 09-6400 Instructional Equipment 19,149.95

11-6400 Instructional Equipment 19,149.94

Unpaid Sales Tax 2,875.89- 35,424.00

10246956 03/27/2017 Follett School Solutions Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 219:64

10246957 03/27/2017 Food 4 Less 01-4310 Student Incentives 105.00

10246958 03/27/2017 Grainger 01-4400 Custodial Equipment 1,965.38

10246959 03/27/2017 Jones School Supply 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,129.63


10246960 03/27/2017 Laerdal Medical Corp 01-4310 Contract Services/Equipment/Supplies 2,835.65

01-4400 Contract Services/Equipment/Supplies 9,359.33




The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the preceding Checks be approved. Page 41 of 55

ReqPayl 2c

Board Report


Check Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10246960 03/27/2017 Laerdal Medical Corp 01-5800 Contract Services/Equipment/Supplies 6,833.13


10246961 03/27/2017 Lakeshore Learning Materials 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,180.71

10246962 03/27/2017 Mission Linen Supply 09-5580 Outside Services 39.65





10246966 03/27/2017 Safe 2 Play-Certified Matters 21-6282 Inspection Fees/Lincoln, Shasta, Golden 875.00

West 10246967 03/27/2017 Scholastic Inc 01-4200 Books 165.64

10246968 03/27/2017 School Outfitters 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 183.79

10246969 03/27/2017 School Specialty 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 175.32

10246970 03/27/2017 Sparkfun Electronics 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 995.01


10246971 03/27/2017 Varsity Spirit Corp 01-4310 CONFIRMING-Instructional Supplies 14,664.85

01-5800 CONFIRMING-Instructional Supplies 2,703.14 17,367.99

10246972 03/27/2017 Woodwind & Brasswind 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 521.77


10246973 03/27/2017 WPS Western Psychological Svcs 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 244.11

10246974 03/27/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 01-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 1,375.34

IT Supplies 55.85 1,431.19



Admin Supplies/Equipment 265.45

Admin/Instructional Supplies 191.44


01-4400 Admin Supplies/Equipment 731.95

01-9320 Stores Replenishment 58,455.00 67,587.43


10247171 03/28/2017 Jeff P. Caligiuri 01-5220 Report Card Training OARS/Mar 7-8 160.00

2017/Final 10247172 03/28/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 50,000.00

10247173 03/28/2017 Julie R. Smith 01-5220 Report Card Training OARS/Mar 7-8 319.90

2017/Final 10247174 03/28/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 13-4310 978- Site Supplies 412.45

10247427 03/29/2017 Apex Lamps 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 344.24

10247428 03/29/2017 Apperson Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 145.60


ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object


Expensed Check Canment Amount Amount

Check Number


10247429 03/29/2017 B&H Photo-Video Remittance Processing Center 01-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 30.24


01-4400 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 864.92




95-4310 ASB Supplies 151.79 259.72

10247432 03/29/2017 Cengage Learning 01-4200 Books 510.83

10247433 03/29/2017 Department Of Justice Accounting Office 01-5844 Outside Services 3,394.00

10247434 03/29/2017 Discount Ag Parts Manteca Inc 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 148.72

10247435 03/29/2017 Guntert Steel 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 304.27


10247437 03/29/2017 'Results LLC 01-5800 Outside Services 30,002.50

10247438 03/29/2017 McGraw-Hill School Education Holdings LLC 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 138,36



10247440 03/29/2017 Neopost USA Inc 01-4310 Postage Meter Supplies 248.97


Promotion Supplies 61.76


10247442 03/29/2017 Penders Music Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 173.90



10247444 03/29/2017 School Outfitters 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 64.47

10247445 03/29/2017 School Services Of Calif 01-5800 Outside Services 230.00

10247446 03/29/2017 CCSESA 01-5222 Travel/Conference 3,500.00

10247447 03/29/2017 Linda E. Clemensen 01-5222 CARS+ Conf/MHS/Feb 24-26/Final 557.68

10247448 03/29/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 21-4400 Technology Equipment 3,483.78




10247452 03/29/2017 Media Fusion Studios Inc 01-5800 Contract Services 4,500.00

10247453 03/29/2017 Nasco Modesto 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 13.34


Instructional Supplies/Books 50.98 614.12

10247454 03/29/2017 Play It Again Sports 01-5800 Customization Services 1,404.83

10247455 03/29/2017 Scott L. Spitsen 01-5222 CARS+ Conf/MHS/Feb 24-26/Final 425.00


ONLINE preceding Checks be approved. Page 42 of 55


ReqPay12c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10247456 03/29/2017 Summit Solutions Consulting 01-5800 Contract Services 1,780.00

10247457 03/29/2017 Stephan W. Unterholzner 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/SHS/March 15-28/Final 1,716.38

10247458 03/29/2017 Ups 01-5920 Outgoing Freight Chgs 135.35

67-5920 Outgoing Freight Chgs 12.99 148.34

10247459 03/29/2017 Assad Insurance Agency Inc 13-5450 979 - Insurance Renewal 2,311.00

10247460 03/29/2017 Downtown Ford Sales 01-6400 New Vehicles 22,497.54

10247581 03/30/2017 C.A.S.H 01-5222 Travel/Conference 548.00

10247582 03/30/2017 Jacalyn A. Davis 01-5222 CLS Conf/Gr Valley/Feb 24-26/Final 184.81


10247584 03/30/2017 Fran's Creative Upholstery 01-5670 Upholstery Repairs 50.00


10247586 03/30/2017 Lisa D. Goodwin 01-5222 CLS Conf/Gr Valley/Feb 24-26/Final 175.81



10247589 03/30/2017 L&M Sales 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 510.22

10247590 03/30/2017 Lake Tahoe Resort Hotel 01-5220 Travel/Conference 510.06

10247591 03/30/2017 Les Schwab Tire Center 01-4390 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 4,098.37


10247593 03/30/2017 Monkeys Auto & RV Services 01-5670 Vehicle Repairs 512.04

10247594 03/30/2017 Amanda E. Piersma 01-5210 Mileage Relmb/Spec Ed/Oct 20-Mar 27 91.30

10247595 03/30/2017 School Services Of Calif 01-5800 Contract Services 2,502.50

10247596 03/30/2017 The Basix 01-5800 Customization Services 852.15


10247598 03/30/2017 Campbell-Keller 01-4310 Admin Furniture 2,168.58


10247600 03/30/2017 Daily Fresh Donuts 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 20.00

10247601 03/30/2017 Elite Entertainment 01-5800 Contract Services 1,195.00

10247602 03/30/2017 Elite Shutters and Shadings In c 01-5600 Outside Services 640.00



10247605 03/30/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 1,843.01

10247606 03/30/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 360.00

Grounds Supplies 250.16 610.16



Custodial/Instructional Supplies 395.91- 1,374.86

10247608 03/30/2017 Izzit.org 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 166.43

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE ON INt



ReqPayl2c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount


10247609 03/30/2017 Mwave.com 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 62.32




10247612 03/30/2017 School Specialty 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 275.58


10247614 03/30/2017 Teacher Direct 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 114.49


10247615 03/30/2017 Tension Relief Sewing 01-4400 Instructional Equipment 1,575.20

Unpaid Sales Tax .37- 1,574.83



95-4310 ASB Supplies 104.33 276.95

10247617 03/30/2017 Home Depot-Maintenance Acct #6035-3225-0399-9090 . 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 3,691.87

10247618 03/30/2017 IPEVO Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 385.46


10247620 03/30/2017 CALPERS Fiscal Svcs Division 01-3412 CaIPERS Health Premium/April 2017 14,137.00

10247621 03/30/2017 AUS West Lockbox 01-5580 Towel Service. 27.00

10247622 03/30/2017 Calif Dept of Educ Office of School Transp 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,000.00

10247623 03/30/2017 Commercial Filter Services 09-4310 Instructional Supplies 364.47

Unpaid Sales Tax .72 365.19

10247624 03/30/2017 Give Every Child A Chance 01-5100 Contract Services 118,175.84


10247626 03/30/2017 Manteca Auto Parts 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 12.39

Transportation Supplies 806.14 818.53

10247627 03/30/2017 Miracle Playsystems Inc 01-4310 Playground Supplies 5,226.74




10247630 03/30/2017 SAC Inc 01-6170 Outside Services 13,600.00

10247631 03/30/2017 Standard Plumbing Supply 01-4400 Maintenance Equipment 759.92

10247632 03/30/2017 Brian Johnson 01-5800 Reimbursement 150.00

10247633 03/30/2017 BusWest LLC 01-4310 Transportation SuppliesNehicle Repairs 2,940.06

10247634 03/30/2017 Buyquest 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 543.46

10247635 03/30/2017 Dell Marketing Lp 01-4310 IT Supplies 79.55





ReqPayl2c

Board Report


Fund-Object Comment


Check Amount

Check Number


Expensed Amount

10247636 03/30/2017 Gigli Hay Inc 01-4310 Farm Supplies 1,204.00


10247638 03/30/2017 ISTE 01-5220 Travel/Conference 3,295.00

10247639 03/30/2017 LDA Partners LLP 22-6281 Architectural & Engineering Services/MHS 602.60

CTE AG 10247640 03/30/2017 Manteca Collision Pros 67-5670 67 - Vehicle Repairs 1,050.00

10247641 03/30/2017 Manteca Every 15 Minutes Program 01-5800 2015/2016 CONFIRMING-Reimbursement 8,081.00

10247642 03/30/2017 Microsoft Corporation 01-4310 Admin Supplies 101.65

10247643 03/30/2017 Rhonda F. Peacock 01-5222 CSNO Annual Conf/Health Svcs/Mar 425.00

16/Reg Fee/Final 10247644 03/30/2017 Point Break Adolescent Resources 01-5800 Contract Services 840.00

10247645 03/30/2017 Kathleen M. Ruble 01-5220 HOSA 2017 Leadership Conf/Sec Ed/Mar 653.88

16-19/Final 10247646 03/30/2017 Ashley J. Schoonover 01-5222 CSHA 2017 Convention/Student Svcs/Mar 280.00

16-19/Reg Fee/Final 10247647 03/30/2017 Kathy B. Snyder 01-5222 NISL Training/Widmer/Mar 15-16/Final 38.40

10247648 03/30/2017 VIA Adventures-California 01-5824 Outside Transportation 1,303.31

10247649 03/30/2017 Wieser Educational 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books 135.56


10247822 03/31/2017 California FCCLA 01-5220 Travel/Conference 319.00

10247823 03/31/2017 Hyatt Place Riverside/Downtown 01-5220 Travel/Conference 465.24


10247825 03/31/2017 Hyatt Place Riverside/Downtown 01-5220 Travel/Conference 465.24

01-5800 Travel/Conference 930.48 1,395.72

10247992 04/03/2017 A&A Portables Inc 01-5610 Equipment Rentals 294.29

10247993 04/03/2017 Aequitas Solutions Inc 01-5800 Contract Services 442.37

10247994 04/03/2017 All Star Heavy Haul & Towing 01-5800 Outside Services 525.00

10247995 04/03/2017 AMS.NET Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 62.55

10247996 04/03/2017 Ruth B. Baker 01-5222 Mgmt Of Employee Benefits/Personnel/Mar 19.20

28/Perdiem/Final

10247997 04/03/2017 Bills Mower & Saw 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 1,396.51

01-5660 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repairs 549.01 1,945.52

10247998 04/03/2017 Developmental Resources 01-5222 Travel/Conference 149.00

10247999 04/03/2017 Dons Mobile Glass Inc 01-5660 Maintenance Repairs 1,059.05

10248000 04/03/2017 Graybar 01-4310 IT Supplies 1,712.74

10248001 04/03/2017 R-J Inc 01-5600 Outside Services 3,780.00

10248002 04/03/2017 San Joaquin County Dept Of Public Works 01-5570 Grounds Dumping Fee 143.07


ESCAPE




ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object Comment


Check Amount


Expensed Amount

10248003 04/03/2017 Sherry D. Scharmann 01-5222 Mgmt of Employee Benefits/Personnel/Mar 19.20

28/Perdiem/Final 10248004 04/03/2017 Scholastic Inc 01-4200 Books 83.12

10248005 04/0312017 Sheraton Seattle Hotel 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,365.35

10248006 04/03/2017 Sparkfun Electronics 01.4310 Instructional Supplies 981.20


10248007 04/03/2017 Standard Plumbing Supply 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 245.50

10248008 04/03/2017 Steve Weiss Music 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 692.69


10248009 04/03/2017 Stockton Kids Club 01-5800 Contract Services 13,075.00


10248011 04/03/2017 The Speech Pathology Group Inc 01-5100 Contracted Services 24,325.98

10248180 04/04/2017 Olivarez Honey Bees Inc 13-4310 978-Ag Supplies 2,500.00

10248181 04/04/2017 Acorn Media Inc 01-4400 Admin Equipment 3,809.39

10248182 04/04/2017 Applegate Teeples Drilling Co 01-5600 CONFIRMING- Outside Services 562.50

10248183 04/04/2017 Nicole D. Burrows 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/LHS/Aug 24-Mar 30 516.09

10248184 04/04/2017 Center Appliance 01-4310 Admin Equipment/Supplies 150.46

01-4400 Admin Equipment/Supplies 746.94 897.40

10248185 04/04/2017 Kathryn A. Coyle 01-5222 UCAC Learning Lab/LHS/Mar 20/Final 127.58

10248186 04/04/2017 Grainger 01-4310 Custodial Supplies 389.96

Maintenance Supplies 405.53 795.49

10248187 04/04/2017 Homewood Suites By Hilton 01-5220 Travel/Conference 215.14

10248188 04/04/2017 IPEVO Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,881.10

10248189 04/04/2017 LEGO Education 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 4,928.61

10248190 04/04/2017 LittleBits Electronics Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 10,278.61


10248191 04/04/2017 Manteca Bulletin 01-5811 RFP Advertisement 158.40

10248192 04/04/2017 Mlxbook.com 01-5800 Yearbooks 848.05

10248193 04/04/2017 Ray's Radio Shop Inc 01-4310 Admin Supplies/Equipment Repairs 234.20



10248196 04/04/2017 The Basix 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,278.77

10248197 04/04/2017 TJM Promotions 01-5800 Customization Services 105.54


10248198 04/04/2017 VEX Robotics Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,014.49


10248199 04/04/2017 Audio Innovations 21-5800 License Fees/Sequoia 454.62





ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated 02127/2017 through 04/09/2017 Board Meeting Date 04/18/2017

Check Number


Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10248200 04/04/2017 B&H Photo-Video Remittance Processing Center 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 2,522.60



10248202 04/04/2017 City of Manteca 01-5510 Utility Water/Garbage/Sewer 707.44

10248203 04/04/2017 CT Brayton & Sons Inc 21-6210 Construction Services/Lincoln Elem 10,518.59


10248205 04/04/2017 Family Career and Community Leaders of America 01-4310 Travel/Conference 18.00

10248206 04/04/2017 Orel B. Garrett 01-5222 AET Record Book Workshop/LHS/Feb 111.28

14-15/Mileage/Final 10248207 04/04/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 37.41


10248208 04/04/2017 Jaswant Abrescy 01-5800 Contract Services 1,500.00

10248209 04/04/2017 Lakeshore Learning Materials 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,272.10


12-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books 1,829.04 3,155.24

10248210 04/04/2017 Cheryl L. Meeker 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Elem Ed/Jan 6- Mar 10 140.12


10248212 04/04/2017 Francisca Montes 01-5210 Mileage Relmb/Health Svs/Jan 6- Mar 28 144.88

10248213 04/04/2017 Steven V. Moretto 01-5222 GRAN Meeting/Comp Ed/March 24 76.29

2017/Mileage 10248214 04/04/2017 Hyatt Regency Orange County 11-5220 Travel/Conference 2,977.65

10248215 04/04/2017 The Cliffs 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,373.28

10248216 04/04/2017 Town and Country Hotel and Convention Center 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,696.56


10248217 04/04/2017 Big Box Property Owner A LLC 13-5620 979 - Warehouse Lease 10,972.99

10248218 04/04/2017 Buddingh Weeder Co 13-4400 978 -Ag Equipment 3,750.00

10248219 04/04/2017 CASBO Calif Assc of School Bus Ofcls 13-5222 978 - Travel/Conference 255.00

10248220 04/04/2017 Central Restaurant Products 13-4310 979 - Supplies 582.43

10248221 04/04/2017 DA Parrish & Sons Inc 13-5600 978- Outside Services 792.25

10248222 04/04/2017 M&J Restaurant Equipment 13-5660 979- Equipment Repairs 9,842.85


979 - Supplies 190.82 13,874.44

10248224 04/04/2017 Diamond Sharp Inc 13-5660 979 - Equipment Repairs 225.00

10248225 04/04/2017 G&K Services 13-5800 978 - Uniforms 346.40


420 - Food 23.90

600 - Food 321.90

620 - Food 165.30


ESCAPE



ReqPayl 2c

Board Report


Check Check Number Date Pay to the Order of Fund-Object

Board

Comment


Expensed Amount

Check Amount


750 - Food 191.40 976.70

10248227 04/04/2017 Lena Valladolid 13-8634 Presales refund: Moved from MUSD 12.00

10248228 04/04/2017 P&R Paper Supply Co 13-4310 979 - Supplies for School Lunch Program 7,520.60



190 - Food 682.10

270 - Food 1,275.50

420 - Food 1,063.18

600 - Food 1,129.00

620 - Food 2,577.75

650 - Food 1,788.15

700 - Food 1,450.00

750 - Food 1,220.30 12,221.28

10248230 04/04/2017 Shred It Usa Inc 13-5800 979 - Outside Services 618.35


040 Food 228.40

070 Food 1,485.38

190 Food 1,887.81

270 Food 1,015.61

420 Food 937.81

600 Food 266.75

650 Food 522.91

700 Food 155.52

750 Food 88.33 7,585.60

10248372 04/05/2017 California's Valued Trust Attn: Finance Dept 01-9513 CVT Health Premium April 2017 2,351,211.09


10248374 04/05/2017 Sonitrol 01-5800 Maintenance Agreement 600.00

21-5600 Fire Alarm Installation/Sequoia 882.23 1,482.23

10248375 04/05/2017 Stanlslaus County Office of Education 01-8096 Mar-Apr 2017 Valley Charter High/Rev in lieu of property tax

469.00




10248377 04/05/2017 US Bank Corp Payment System 01-4310 District Purchasing Card 33,627.21

10248378 04/05/2017 Ricoh USA Inc 01-5640 821-Maintenance Agreement 19.91

Maintenance Agreement 5,668.27

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE ONLINE




ReqPay12c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10248378 04/05/2017 Ricoh USA Inc 01-5640 Maintenance Agreements 191.03

Print Shop Services/Maintenance 6,188.21

Agreement 01-5800 Print Shop Services/Maintenance 20,584.19

Agreement 09-5640 Maintenance Agreement 56.91

11-5640 Maintenance Agreement 50.73

13-5640 978-Maintenance Agreement 139.49 32,898.74

10248379 04/05/2017 AccuTrain Corporation 01-5220 Travel/Conference 440.00

10248380 04/05/2017 American Trash Management Inc 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 690.28


10248381 04/05/2017 AT&T 01-5940 Utilities - Telephone Service 6,615.64

10248382 04/05/2017 AUS West Lockbox 01-5600 Rentpl Services 30.40

10248383 04/05/2017 Francine M. Baird 01-5210 Mileage Dec 20, 2016-Mar 14, 2017 244.05

10248384 04/05/2017 Buttes/Center State Pipe & Supply 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 9,362.48

10248385 04/05/2017 City of Stockton 01-5510 Utilities - Water 5,447.43

Utilities - Water/Sewer 249.90

Utility Water/Sewer 160.22 5,857.55

10248386 04/05/2017 Christopher L. Courtney 01-5220 CUE Conference/Mar 15-18 2017/Final 181.21

10248387 04/05/2017 Kathleen A. Crouse 01-5210 Mileage Jan 6 - Mar 27, 2017 123.48

10248388 04/05/2017 Samantha K. Danley 01-5220 Illuminate Conference/Feb 21-22, 2017/Final

136.60

10248389 04/05/2017 Herff Jones Inc 01-4310 Graduation Supplies 381.16


10248390 04/05/2017 Interstate Music Division of Cascio Music Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 145,70


10248391 04/05/2017 Jared Lee Hefter 01-5800 Contracted Services 3,000.00

10248392 04/05/2017 Jostens Inc 01-5800 Customization Services/Supplies 755.31

10248393 04/05/2017 KW Cages WingzAvian Products 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 67.69


10248394 04/05/2017 Kristen L. Messer 01-5220 Illuminate Conference/Feb 21-22, 2017/Final

228.60



Instructional Suppliles 52.99 1,297.41


10248397 04/05/2017 Lisa M. Schnaidt 01-5220 Illuminate Conference/Feb 21-22, 2017/Final

201.20


I ESCAPE




ReqPayl2c

Board Report

Checks Dated

Check Number

02/27/2017 through 04/09/2017

Fund-Object


Expensed Check Comment Amount Amount


10248398 04/05/2017 Sonitrol 21-5600 Fire Alarm Installation/Shasta Elem 345.00

Phase1

10248399 04/05/2017 Anne P. Steiner 01-5220 Cue Conference/Mar15-19, 2017/Final 527.11

10248590 04/06/2017 AASA 01-5300 Membership Fees 450.00

10248591 04/06/2017 Discount Ag Parts Manteca Inc 01-4310 Grounds Supplies/Equipment Repair 686.79

Maintenance Supplies/Repairs 760.49 1,447.28

10248592 04/06/2017 Tammy L. Dunbar 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lincoln/Mar 15-18/Final 844.65

10248593 04/06/2017 Elite Entertainment 95-5800 Contract Services 300.00

10248594 04/06/2017 Fisher Scientific 01-4310 Instructional Supplies _ 323.93

10248595 04/06/2017 Harry K Wong Publications 01-4200 Instructional Supplies/Books/Online 294.00

Access 01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Books/Online 675.86

Access 01-5800 Instructional Supplies/Books/Online 97.36

Access Unpaid Sales Tax 9.64- 1,057.58

10248596 04/06/2017 JM Equipment 01-5660 Grounds Supplies/Equipment 618.00

Repairs/Inspections 10248597 04/06/2017 Jones School Supply 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 506.99


10248598 04/06/2017 Jostens Inc 01-5800 Customization Services/Supplies 1,685.67


10248600 04/06/2017 Mc Coy Truck Tire SVc Center 01-4390 Transportation Tires/Supplies/Repairs 587.83


10248602 04/06/2017 Microsoft Corporation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 96,624.02

10248603 04/06/2017 MobyMax LLC 01-5800 License Fee 389.00


10248605 04/06/2017 Matthew L. O'Donnell 01-5220 Educating for Careers Conf/WRHS/Mar 121.25

5-7/Final 10248606 04/06/2017 Rondy D. Owens 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/Feb 5- March 17 113.85

10248607 04/06/2017 Roberto F. Rosas 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/March 15-18/Final 1,343.53

10248608 04/06/2017 Tony Byrnes 01-5800 Outside Services 700.00

10248609 04/06/2017 Laurie A. Vazquez 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Mar 15-17/Final 1,343.53

10248610 04/06/2017 Wallace-Kuhl & Assoc 21-6283 Outside Services/Golden West 280.00

10248611 04/06/2017 Ronald R. Wayman 01-5220 Educating for Careers Conf/WRHS/Mar 97.25

5-7/Final

10248612 04/06/2017 Apex Lamps 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 409.30

10248613 04/06/2017 Buttes/Center State Pipe & Supply 01-4400 Maintenance Equipment 2,347.06

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board preceding Checks be approved.

of Trustees. It is recommended that the ESCAPE ONLINE Page 50 of 55


ReqPay12c

Board Report




Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10248614 04/06/2017 Center For The Collaborative Classroom 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 639.38

10248615 04/06/2017 Clutch & Brake Xchange Inc 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 2,677.86

10248616 04/06/2017 Contract Coating Corp 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 3,821.25

10248617 04/06/2017 Corix Water Products Inc 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 178.57

10248618 04/06/2017 Double Stitch 01-5800 Customization Services 3,810.40



Library Supplies 407.34 3,140.14



10248622 04/06/2017 R&B Company 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 622.83



10248624 04/06/2017 Roshambo Fundraising Inc 01-5800 CONFIRMING-Contract Services 350.00

10248625 04/06/2017 VIA Adventures-California 01-5824 Outside Transportation 1,169.25

10248626 04/06/2017 Academic Therapy Publications High Noon Books 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 166.71

10248627 04/06/2017 Advanced Chemical Transport 01-5800 Transportation Outside Services/Supplies 259.00

10248628 04/06/2017 Agra Tech Inc 22-6281 Engineering/2016 CTE Grant -MHS AG Fac 2,741.25

Imp 10248629 04/06/2017 All Volleyball Inc 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 575.51


10248630 04/06/2017 American Trash Management Inc 01-5800 Outside Services 240.00

10248631 04/06/2017 Anaya Construction 01-6170 Outside Services 17,376,00

10248632 04/06/2017 AT&T 01-5940 Utility Telephone Service 52.38

10248633 04/06/2017 Capital One Commercial Costco 01-4310 Instructional Supplies/Printing 163.24

10248634 04/06/2017 Craig D Faitel 21-6282 Inspection Fees/Lincoln, Shasta, Lathrop 270.00

10248635 04/06/2017 DA Parrish & Sons Inc 01-5600 Maintenance Repairs 250.00


10248637 04/06/2017 Educators Publishing Service 01-4200 Books 143.37


10248639 04/06/2017 Floral Supply Syndicate-Adm 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 317.94

10248640 04/06/2017 Fulcrum Management Solutions 01-5800 Software 11,628.00

10248641 04/06/2017 Graybar 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 562.41


10248642 04/06/2017 Hayden-McNeil Publishing 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 1,536.60


10248643 04/06/2017 Holt Of California 01-4310 Transportation Supplies 37.90


I ESCAPE

ONLINE




ReqPart2c

Board Report

Checks Dated 02127/2017 through 04/09/2017



Expensed Amount

Check Amount

10248644 04/06/2017 JM Equipment 01-5660 Maintenance Equipment 1,360.07

Repairs/Inspections 11-5800 Contract Services 1,625.00

Outside Services 225.00 3,210.07

10248645 04/06/2017 Kamps Propane 01-5600 Transportation Supplies/Rental 90.00

10248646 04/06/2017 Kristi Marguerite Dominguez 01-5800 Mileage Reimbursement 666.39

10248647 04/06/2017 Microsoft Corporation 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 267,567.38

10248648 04/06/2017 Parks Wholesale Nursery 01-4310 Grounds Supplies 377.12

10248649 04/06/2017 Poor Richards Press 014310 Admin Supplies 17,898.25


10248650 04/06/2017 Spinitar 01-4310 Instructional Equipment/Supplies 661.67


10248651 04/06/2017 Stericycle Inc 01-5800 Outside Services /Supplies 514.83

10248652 04/06/2017 Stockton Fence & Material Co 01-5600 Outside Services 10,695.00

10248653 04/06/2017 Virco Inc 01-4310 Instruction Supplies 1,117.07

10248654 04/06/2017 Western Building Materials 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 449.15


10248655 04/06/2017 Ofelia Tornero 01-1999 Tlmehseet rec'd from Sec. Ed after payroll run

2,984.35

10248656 04/06/2017 Arabella M. Whitlock 01-1999 Tlmesheet rec'd from Sec Ed after payroll run

70.79

10248657 04/06/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 20,000.00

10248658 04/06/2017 SYNCB/Amazon 01-4310 Admin Supplies 7.57



10248659 04/06/2017 Valley Community Counseling Services 01-5100 Contract Services 161,142.50

01-5800 Contract Services 112.50 161,255.00




270 - Program Food 994.12 600 - Program Food 1,170.37




750 - Program Food 2,774.19 16,344.32

10248661 04/06/2017 Cole R. Dutter 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 51.41

13-5222 Conf CCOF/DO NE/2-27/final 78.37 129,78


I ESCAPE ONLINE Page 52 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report



Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017

Check Amount

10248662 04/06/2017 Bryan K. Ehrenholm 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 74.71 10248663 04/06/2017 Enrigueta C Mejia 13-8634 Presales refund: status change 130.00 10248664 04/06/2017 Sandra L. Helsel 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 34.24 10248665 04/06/2017 Laura J. Howe 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 97.37

10248666 04/06/2017 Jennifer N. Lew-Vang 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 24.24 10248667 04/06/2017 Pams Lunchroom LIc 13-5800 978 - Fee 3,327.92

10248668 04/06/2017 Joe a Pires Jr 13-5222 Conf CCOF/DO NE/2-27/final 19.20 10248669 04/06/2017 Joyce A. Rubalcaba 13-5210 Mileage reimb monthly 45.53

10248670 04/06/2017 Office Depot 01-4310 Admin Supplies 1,742.87 Instructional Supplies 19,156.81

Instructional/Library Supplies 136.69

01-4400 Instructional Equipment 3,379.18 24,415.55

10248671 04/06/2017 Ruth B. Baker 01-5220 Shell Beach Conf/Human Res/Apr 76.80

26-28/Adv Perdiem 10248672 04/06/2017 Cheryl A. Behler 01-5220 HOSA Leadership Conf/MHS/Mar 83.51

16-18/Final 10248673 04/06/2017 Bonnie J. Bennett 01-5220 Shell beach Conf/Human Res/Apr 76.80

26-28/Adv Perdiem 10248674 04/06/2017 Eryn E. Bowers 01-5220 Small Business 536.32

Symposlum/Reissue/EUHS/Feb 17-19 2016/

10248675 04/06/2017 Central Union High School Dist rict 01-5800 Internship/Dank, Montialll/Health-Science-Medical/80+ hrs

3,000.00

10248676 04/06/2017 Kerry A. Gilmore 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 845.41

15-18/Final 10248677 04/06/2017 Roger A. Goatcher 01-5220 Shell Beach Conf/Deputy Supt/Apr 76.80

26-28/Adv Perdiem 10248678 04/06/2017 Rebecca J. Hunter 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 380.49

15-18/Final 10248679 04/06/2017 Molly T. Lowe 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Lathrop Elem/Mar 807.72

15-18/Final 10248680 04/06/2017 Annette B. Medina 01-3712 Retiree Benefit/Medical Cap/Cash in 687.11

Lieu/April 2017 10248681 04/06/2017 Republic Services #208 01-5570 Disposal Service 14,038.37

10248682 04/06/2017 ShowBiz Event Lighting 01-5800 Outside Services 1,000.00

10248683 04/06/2017 Jennifer D. Taylor 01-5220 CUE 2017 Conf/Fr Camp/Mar 15-18/Final 1,343.53

10248684 04/06/2017 Darci J. Tienken 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/Spec Ed/July 25- Mar 28 221.50

2017

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It Is recommended that the preceding Checks be approved.

ESCAPE

ONLINE

Page 53 of 55



ReqPayl2c

Board Report



Board Meeting Date

Expensed Amount

04/18/2017

Check Amount

10248685 04/06/2017 Andrea C. Wright 01-5210 Mileage Reimb/REad 180 Teacher/Split 40.13

Sites/Mar 1-31 10248686 04/06/2017 Eric S. Finks 01-1999 Timehseet submitted late to Payroll 1,216.86

10248687 04/06/2017 Stephen A. Souza 01-1999 Timesheet received in payroll after payroll run

3,901.21

10248809 04/07/2017 AIFD 01-5220 Travel/Conference 1,471.00


10248811 04/07/2017 Comfort Suites Fresno RiverPark 01-5220 Travel/Conference 776.34


10248812 04/07/2017 Fresh Ideas Flower Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 141.74

10248813 04/07/2017 Gottschalk Music Center Inc 01-5660 Equipment Repairs 136.11

10248814 04/07/2017 Janis Music Co 01-4310 Instructional Supplies 319.16

10248815 04/07/2017 Stanislaus County Office of Education 01-8096 Stan. Co Charter School/In Lleu Prop 2,152.00

Tax/Mar/Apr 2017 10248816 04/07/2017 USAIrcondltIonIng 01-4310 Maintenance Supplies 84,41


11119054 03/10/2017 Benjamin R. Garcia Cancelled 3,427.79 *

Cancelled on 03/17/2017, Cancel Register it PM170318

Total Number of Checks 1,275 10,828,460.18

Count Amount

Cancel 4 8,880.44

Net Issue 10,819,579.74

Fund Summary

Fund Description Check Count Expensed Amount

01 01 1,102 8,522,204.58

09 09 33 32,030.22

11 11 14 34,703.93

12 12 1 1,883.14

13 13 110 643,985.81

21 21 21 1,486,454.82

22 22 5 10,320.57

25 25 13 76,663.84

67 67 7 6,023.60

The preceding Checks have been issued in accordance with the District's Policy and authorization of the Board of Trustees. It is recommended that the I ESCAPE ONLINE preceding Checks be approved. Page 54 of 55


ReqPayl 2c

Board Report


Check

Check

Expensed

Check Number

Date

Pay to the Order of

Fund-Object

Comment

Amount

Amount

Fund Summary

Fund Description Check Count Expensed Amount

77 77 3 5,101.55

78 78 4 7,221.55

80 80 3 784.04

81 81 3 5,101.55

95 95 6 912.31

Total Number of Checks 1,271 10,833,391.51

Less Unpaid Sales Tax Liability 9,371.55

Net (Check Amount) 10,824,019.96


preceding Checks be approved. ONLINE,

Page 55 of 55



Agenda Item

Department: SO Type: Action (Report)

Item Number: 1


TITLE: Growth Update From Steering Committee and Davis Demographics Comprehensive Demographic Study

Background/Rationale: Growth Update As part of monitoring the growth and providing updates to the Board, this item is on the agenda should there be any updates from the Steering Committee.

Comprehensive Demographic Study On November 15, 2016, the Board of Education entered into contract with Davis Demographics for the preparation of a Comprehensive Demographic Study. The purpose of this study is to analyze demographic data relevant to the District's facility planning efforts. The scope of the contracted work includes mapping the District, address matching the past student data files, developing a set of five-year and Maturation student population projections. This study was also prepared to assist the District's efforts in evaluating future site requirements, including how many additional sites and where and when they may be needed.

As an optional task in the contract, the Board may also consider utilizing Davis Demographics School Site Planning Suite which would give staff the ability to utilize GIS data generated for the Demographic study to generate mapping and demographic based reports for future planning.

See attached report.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: N/A

Presentation: pi No flYes (attached) [Z] Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By: Approved By: - Superintendent's Office

2271 'Vest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • 13oaal

Manteca Unified School District Manteca, California

Fall 2016/2017 Report

Student Population Projections Fall 2016 – Fall 2021

By Residence and at Maturity

Based on Fall 2016 Data

Prepared by

April 13, 2017

Manteca Unfied School District SY 2016/2017 Report

April 13, 2017 TOC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and District Background Executive Summary Section One: Methodology Sources of Data 1 5 year Projection Methodology 4 Projection Variables 5 Applying Variables to Generate Projections 11 Section Two: Planned Residential Development Planned Development Summary by Study Area 16 Map: Future Development in District 17 Section Three: Attendance Matrices

Attendance Matrices 19 Elementary School Attendance Matrix 20 High School Attendance Matrix 21

Section Four: District Wide Student Projections

District Student Projection Summary 23 School Year 2016/17- School Year 2021/22 and Maturity K-12 Projections Chart 24 K-8 Projections Chart 24 9-12 Projections Chart 24 District Wide Student Projection Trends 25

Section Five: Attendance Area Projections by Residence

Elementary School Attendance Area Projections 26 Elementary School Student Projection Trends 31 Elementary Attendance Area Map 32

High School Attendance Area Projections

High School Projections by Residence 33 High School Student Projection Trends 35 High School Attendance Area Map 36

Appendix A: Study Area Projections Study Area Map 37

Study Area Resident Projections 38

Manteca Unfied School District SY 2016/2017 Report

INTRODUCTIONApril 13, 2017

INTRODUCTION AND DISTRICT BACKGROUND The Manteca Unified School District has contracted with Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. (DDP) to develop and analyze demographic data relevant to the District’s facility planning efforts. The scope of contracted work includes: mapping the District, geocoding a student file that is usually representative of October's official head count, developing and researching pertinent demographic data, identifying future residential development plans, if any, and developing a five year student population projection. DDP will then assist the District in developing solutions for housing future student population. This study was prepared to assist the District’s efforts in evaluating future site requirements and attendance area changes. The purpose of this report is to identify and inform the District of the trends occurring in the community; how these trends may affect future student population; and to assist in illustrating facility adjustments that may be necessary to accommodate the potential student population shifts. The District can then use this information to better plan for the need, location and timing of facility or boundary adjustments. The Sources of Data section details where the two sources of data, geographic and non-geographic, are collected and how each data item is used in the five year student population projection model. The five Year Projection Methodology section discusses, in detail, how the factors used in the study were calculated and why they were used. These factors include: the calculation of incoming kindergarten classes, additional students from new housing (referred to as student yield), the effects of student mobility, and a detailed review of planned residential development within the District. The Student Resident Projection Summary sections are a review of SY 2016/17's student resident projection results. Included in these sections are a district wide student population projection summary and a projected resident student population summary for each existing attendance area and study area. While reading this report, it is important to remember that this is a snapshot of current and potential student population based upon data gathered in fall 2008. Population demographics change, development plans change, funding opportunities can change, District priorities can change, and therefore, new projections and adjustments to the overall Facilities Master Plan will continue to be necessary in the future.

Manteca Unified School District SY 2016/2017 Report

1Section One – PageApril 13, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. is assisting the Manteca Unified School District to plan for future student population changes. By factoring current and historical student data with demographic data and planned residential development, DDP calculated a Five year student population projection. In addition to the five year projection DDP was also contracted to conduct a build out projection that takes into account all potential development to estimate the District’s resident student population at maturity or buildout. These projections are based upon residence of the students and are designed to alert the District as to when and where student population shifts will occur and assist the District in determining how best to add and distribute capacity to house its growing resident student population.

The Manteca Unified School District is expected to continue to grow over the next five years. The bulk of the growth is expected to occur within the District’s K-8 student population as it is expected to climb from a total of 16,400 students to 17,350 students by 2021. This amounts to an increase of 950 students over a 5 year period. Growth is also expected to occur in the District High School student population as well as an additional 377 students are projected to be added during this same period. In the end the District can expect to see its’ high school student population reach 7,84 students at the end of the projection period. Overall this amounts to total increase for the District as a whole of 1,327 TK-12 students. Two keys factors are primarily responsible for the projected growth. This most important of these two factors is the amount of planned residential development that is expected to occur over the next 5 years. Conversations with District staff City Planners and realtors lead us to believe that 2,240 units will be built by 2021 and will help the District’s resident student population to grow. Also contributing to the District’s growth will be the growing size of incoming kindergarten classes expected to enter the District beginning as soon as 2018 to due increasing birth rates that date back to 2012.

To this point that District has been able to manage the Districts’ growing elementary student population through use of an overflow policy that sends students away from impacted sights to sights with excess capacity. The solution will begin to become less effective in providing relief for impacted areas as these same areas are the ones that are expected to see the most growth over the next 5 years. The Veritas and Mossdale elementary attendance areas will add 429 and 361 students respectively to their resident student populations over the next 5 years. As such this will be an area the District will need to be focused on moving forward as capacity at these sites will be greatly surpassed by their resident student populations.

At the high school level there is enough existing capacity to adequately house the District’s high school student population. However the student population could be more efficiently distributed as Manteca High School currently sees a resident student population that is larger than the capacity of the facility itself. This has not been an issue that District has been forced to deal with yet due the that fact that nearly 500 student have elected on their own to attend a school outside their school of residence allowing enrollment of the campus to stay below its capacity.

Due to the amount of land designated for residential development there is potential for the District to see a tremendous amount of growth at buildout/maturation, a point in time in which all developable land is improved upon and neighborhoods have fully matured. Current zoning allows for the potential of 32,286 additional units to be constructed throughout Manteca Unified. This will result in the District adding up to 26,567 students once all of these units are built. Determining how many facilities will be needed out maturity is a function of how large the District would like to see its campuses. :Moving forward District staff plans to being work on exactly as well as addressing how best to address existing and future capacity concerns using the finding and underlying data from this report. Potential solutions include but are not limited to adding addition school sites, adding modular units or classroom wings and even changing attendance boundaries to provide relief to impacted sites.



SECTION ONE – METHODOLOGY SOURCES OF DATA Geographic Map Data Five geographic data layers were created for use in the 5 year student population projections:

1. Street Centerline Database 2. Study Areas 3. Schools 4. Students – Historical and Current 5. Planned Residential Development

1) Street Centerline Data DDP has acquired a digital street centerline map of the School District from San Joaquin County. The street database has associated attributes that contains, but are not limited to, the following fields: full street name, address range and street classification

The main function of the streets is in the geocoding process of the student data. Each student is geocoded to the streets by their given residence address. The geocoding process places a point on the map for every student in the exact location that student resides. This enables DDP to analyze the student data in a geographic manner.

Another vital utilization of the digital street database is in the construction of study areas. Freeways, major streets and neighborhood streets are generally used as boundaries for the study areas. 2) Study Areas Study areas are small geographic areas, similar to neighborhoods, and the building blocks of a school district. Study areas are geographically defined following logical boundaries of the neighborhood such as freeways, streets, railroad tracks, or rivers. Each study area is then coded with the elementary, middle and high school that the area is assigned to attend. By gathering information about the district at the study area level, DDP and the District can closely monitor growth and demographic trends in particular regions and identify potential need for boundary adjustments or new facilities. 3) Schools The District provided school facility location information to DDP for the purpose of mapping the District facilities. The school information includes school name, address, unique code and capacity. 4) Student Data

a. Historical Student Data - Historical enrollment is used to compare past student population growth and trends as well as the effects of mobility (move in, move out from existing housing) throughout the District. DDP utilized the four (4) previous year's (14/15, 15/16, 16/17) geocoded students as historical data.



b. Current Student Data - A student data file for October 6, 2016 (received by computer data file from the School District) summarized by grade level and by study area is used as a base for student population projections. Existing students were categorized by study area through the geocoding process that locates each student within a particular area based upon their given address. The projections run each of the next 5 years from school year 2016/17 through school year 2021/2022. c. Student Accounting The Student Accounting Summary (Table 1) indicates the total student enrollment as of October 6, 2016 and the number of student used in the five year student population projections. The projection model is based upon student residence and excludes students residing outside of the District’s boundaries, students unable to be address matched and special education students (special education students usually attend a school that services their particular need).

Student Accounting Summary School Year 2016/17 Actual Enrollment (10/6/2016)

Total Students Provided by District File (October, 2016) 23,922 Students Living out of District -131 Students Unable to be address matched (incorrect address information) -2 Special Education Student (SDC) -1,107 Independent Study -153 Alternative Education -271 Transitional-Kindergarten Students -502

RESIDENT STUDENTS USED IN PROJECTIONS 21,756

Table 1– Student Accounting Summary

5) Planned Residential Development This data was obtained through discussions with the District, city agencies, county agencies and major developers within the district boundaries. Data includes development name, location, housing type, total number of units and projected move in dates (phasing). Phasing for planned housing is factored into the five year projections. (See SECTION 2 for a detailed listing of the planned residential development). In the student population projection DDP includes all Approved and Tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the projection timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates is a snapshot of the District at the time of this study. All of the information may change and should be updated annually. Data Used for Variables Three sets of data were compiled and reviewed for use in the five year student population projections by residence:

1. Births by Zip Code 2. Mobility Factors 3. Student Yield Factors

1) Births by Zip Code Data Birth data by postal zip code was obtained from the California State Department of Health for the years 2009--2014 and roughly correlated to the Manteca Unified School District. Past



changes in historical birthrates are used to estimate future incoming kindergarten student population from existing housing. 2) Mobility Factors Mobility refers to the increase/decrease in the migration of students within the District boundary (move-in/move-out of students from existing housing). Mobility, which is essentially a modified cohort, is applied as a percentage of increase/decrease among each grade for every year of the projections. 3) Student Yield Factors (SYFs) Student Yield Factors were calculated by DDP from a house count of existing dwelling units throughout the District. This survey includes three housing types: single-family detached, multi-family attached (town- homes, condominiums, duplexes, triplexes, quads) and apartments The student yield factors, combined with planned residential development units are used to determine the number of students generated from new residential housing development projects. Student Yield Factor calculations will be discussed again in the Five Year Projection Methodology section.



FIVE YEAR PROJECTION METHODOLOGY

The projection methodology used in this study combines historical student population counts, past and present demographic characteristics, and planned residential development to forecast future student population at the study area level. District-wide projections are summarized from the individual study area projections. These projections are based on where the students reside and where they should be attending school. We use the actual location of where the students reside, as opposed to their school of enrollment, in order to provide the most accurate estimate of where future school facilities should be located. The best way to plan for future student population shifts is to know where the next group of students will be residing. The following details the methodology used in preparing the student population projections by residence. Five Year Projections Projections are calculated out five years from the date of projection for several reasons. The planning horizon for any type of facility is typically no less than five years, often longer. Five years are usually sufficient to adequately plan for a new facility. It is a short to mid term solution for planning needs. Projections beyond five years are based on speculation due to the lack of reliable information on birthrates, new home construction and economic conditions. Why Projections are Calculated by Residence Typically, school district projections are based on enrollment by school. However, this method is inadequate when used to locate future school facility needs, because the location of the students is not taken into consideration. A school’s enrollment can fluctuate due to variables in the curriculum, program changes, school administration and open enrollment policies. These variables can skew the apparent need for new or additional facilities in an area. The method used by DDP is unique because it modifies a standard cohort projection with demographic factors and actual student location. DDP bases its projections on the belief that school facility planning is more accurate when facilities are located where the greatest number of students reside. The best way to plan for facility requirements is to know where the next group of students will be residing. The following details the methodology used in preparing the student population projections.



PROJECTION VARIABLES Each year of the projections, 12th grade students graduate and continuing students progress through to the next grade level. This normal progression of students is modified by the following factors: 1) Incoming Kindergarten

Live birth data is reported to the California State Department of Health by the resident postal zip code of the mother. DDP uses the birth data by zip code roughly correlating to the District boundary and applies the data accordingly. If need be a different birth factor can be applied to various areas of the District.

Incoming kindergarten classes, for existing homes, are estimated by comparing changes in past births in the area. Table 2 illustrates the total births for each zip code in the Hillsboro School District from 2000 to 2015. DDP assumes the current kindergarten class (2016/17) was born in five years ago (2011). Future incoming kindergarten classes are estimated by comparing the number births in 2011 to the number of births in 2012 – 2015. DDP compared the total births in 2011 to the total births in 2012, to determine a factor for next year's kindergarten class (2017/18). The 2011 births were compared to 2013 (2018/19’s K class), 2011 to 2014 (2019/20’s K class) and 2011 to 2015 (2020/21’s K class).

Table 2 – Births by Zip



2) Student Mobility Factors Student mobility factors further refine the five year student population projections. Mobility refers to the increase/decrease in the migration of students within the District boundary (move-in/move-out of students from existing housing). Mobility, similar to a cohort, is applied as a percentage of increase/decrease to each grade for every year of the projections. A net increase or decrease of zero students over time is represented by a factor of 1.000. A net student loss is represented by a factor less than 1.000 and a net gain by a factor greater than 1.000 (see Table 4).

Example: 100 Kindergarten students in fall 16/17 x 0.93 (August Knodt 1st grade mobility) = 93 1st grade students in fall 17/18

Having historical student data categorized by Study area is extremely helpful in calculating accurate Student Mobility Factors. DDP was able to utilize the last four year’s (school years 2013/14, 2014/15, 2015/16, and 2016/17) student data. The 2013/14 student data was compared to 2014/15, 2014/15 to 2015/16, and 2015/16 to this year’s student data at the Study area level. Grades 1-12 Mobility were all calculated to correspond with the elementary school attendance areas.

Table 3– Mobility Factors



4) Student Yield Factors The Student Yield Factors, when applied to planned residential development units, determine how many additional students will be generated from new construction within the District (see Section Two for details on planned residential development)

Two sets of data are required to calculate Student Yield Factors: a current student file (provided by the District) and current housing unit data (taken from the San Joaquin County Tax Assessor files. Each student record and tax assessor record is geocoded by their given address. The two database sets are then linked by common address. This allows DDP to associate each student with a specific housing unit. For the District, three general categories of housing units were analyzed; Single-Family Detached (SFD), Multi-Family Attached (MFA) and Apartments (APT).

Before the SYFs can be calculated from the current housing stock, the year of construction for each housing type must be determined. In general, new housing attracts young families with elementary school aged children. Over the next 12 to 15 years, the children grow older and pass through the grades. This cycle is then repeated throughout the life of the home. Identifying the year of construction and number of current resident students in recently built housing units assists in estimating the number of new students generated from future residential development.

In addition, other elements apart from the year of construction can be assessed. These elements include, but are not limited to, housing type, number of bedrooms, geographic location (study area), value of home, etc. Once a determining element is decided upon, simple calculations are performed to produce a Student Yield Factor. The total number of units for that housing type then divides the number of current students residing in each housing type.

DDP calculated three different Student Yield Factors in January 2017. All units regardless of year of construction district wide, all units regardless of year of construction for each elementary attendance zone and units built between 2011-2016. Upon examining the results, DDP determine that the Student Yield Factors for units built between 2011-2016 would most accurately estimate the number of students new housing would yield. These units are similar in size a location to the planned residential development. It was decided to apply that SYF to the planned residential development within the District over the next seven years. This sample should reflect a reasonable number of students expected from planned residential developments

***Unit totals include units built after 2011 and exclude age restricted units***

Table 4 – Student Yield Factors



5) Planned Residential Development Closely related to the Student Yield Factors are planned residential development units. Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that will be built over the time frame of the student population projections. The units built within the next five years will have the appropriate SYF applied to it to determine the number of new students the planned residential development will yield. This data was obtained through discussions with the District, city agencies, county agencies and major developers within the District boundaries. Data includes development name, location, housing type, total number of units and projected move in dates (phasing). Phasing for planned housing is factored into the five projections. (See SECTION 2 for a detailed listing of the planned residential development). In the student population projection by residence DDP includes all Approved and Tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the projection timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates is a snapshot of the District at the time of this study. All of the information may change and should be updated annually.



APPLYING THE VARIABLES TO GENERATE THE PROJECTIONS The following paragraphs summarize how DDP uses the factors to determine the student population projections. Remember that these projections are based on residence. Manteca Unified School District has been divided into 314 study areas. Every study area is coded with the school code of the elementary, and high schools attendance area it falls within. The residential projections are calculated at the study area level. This means that DDP conducts 314 individual projections that are based upon the number of students residing in each study area. The first step in calculated the projections is to tally the number of students that live in each study area by each grade (Kindergarten through 12th grade). The current student base (school year 2016/17) is then passed onto the next year's grade (2016/17’s K become 2017/18's 1st graders, 2017/18's 1st graders become 2018/19's 2nd graders, and so on). After the natural progression of students through the grades is applied, then Birth Factors are multiplied to the current kindergarten class to generate a base for the following year's kindergarten class. Next, a Mobility Factor is applied to all grades. Again, these factors take into account the natural in/out migration of students throughout the District. The mobility factor is applied to each student in every grade (K-12). A unique mobility factor is applied to each elementary school attendance area determined by the mobility factor study. The last essential layer applied to the projections deals with additional students from planned residential development. This is a simple calculation, again conducted at the study area level, where the estimated number of new housing units for a particular year is multiplied by the appropriate Student Yield Factor. For example, if 100 single family detached (SF) units are to be built in a specific study area in a given year, then you would multiply this number (100) by the SFD K-6 student yield factor (.167) and the resulting number (16.7) is divided evenly among the seven grades. To finish generating the projections by residence, the same process is conducted for each of the 314 study areas. Once the projections have been run at the study area level, then it is simple addition to determine projections for each of the District's attendance areas or for a district-wide summary. For example, the residential projections for the August Knodt Elementary attendance area is simply the summary of all of the study areas that make up this specific attendance area (see Section Five, Six and Seven) for the projections of each elementary and high school attendance areas). The District Summary for the projections (Section Four) is a total summary of all 314 study areas. The projections excludes all of the students that attend a District school but live completely outside of the District's boundaries, and students unable to be geocoded, special education students and independent study students. These students are factored back into the projections by calculating their current overall percentage of student population, applying the percentage to future years and adding it to the resident projections (please see the Attendance Matrices in Section Three for a breakdown of the out-of-district and unmatched students by school). DDP adds the current total out-of-district and unmatched students to each year of the projections because there is no way to accurately forecast these students in the future. Current and historical students, geographic data and non-geographic data are used to calculate the factors used in the student population projections by residence. These factors are applied using SchoolSite and projections are calculated for each study area for each grade.



Projections by Residence Flowchart



MATURATION PROJECTION METHODOLOGY

The five year student population projections by residence offer a short to mid term view into the future of the Manteca Unified School District. In order to plan for long-term possibilities, DDP provides a maturation, or build out projection. The maturation projection gives a reasonable estimate for the future build out student population that may be expected based upon all vacant land being developed under current zoning policies. There is no specific time frame in which this is to occur. These projections provide the District with a long-term outlook of student population and location, assisting the District in planning for future facility requirements. Maturation projections are calculated separate from the five year projections. These projections show possible student population for the District at build out. The maturity projection process combines current housing (obtained from San Joaquin County Tax Assessor files), planned residential development (San Joaquin County and local developers) and an estimate of additional potential housing (from aerial photographs, area zoning maps and discussions with District officials) for the District. The sum of these three sources totals the potential number of units at build out. This sum is then multiplied by the appropriate Maturation Student Yield Factor to produce the maturation student population projections by residence. The planned residential development, information, phasing estimate and zoning policies is a snapshot of the District at the time of this study. All of the information may change and should be updated when changes occur. Maturation Student Yield Factors Upon examining the results, DDP determine that the District Wide Maturation Student Yield Factor – regardless of the year of construction (see the Appendix B for calculations of MSYFs) would accurately estimate the number of students residing in the District at build out. This MSYF was selected because at build out the District will be comprised of housing units of various ages.

Table 5 – Maturation Student Yield Factors



MATURATION PROJECTIONS BY RESIDENCE FLOW CHART


15April 13, 2017 Section Two – Page

SECTION TWO – PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT This data was obtained through discussions with the major developers within the District boundaries, affiliated Planning Departments and local developers. A database and map of the planned residential development was created, including, when available, project name, location, housing type, total number of units and estimated move in dates (phasing schedule). Projected phasing is based upon occupancy of the unit and is used to help time the arrival of students from these new developments. In the student population projection by residence DDP includes all Approved and Tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the seven year projection timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates is a snapshot of the District at the time of this study. All of the information may change and should be updated annually. Current plans point to 1,889 single family homes and 351 apartment units to be constructed over the next 5 years. These units come from projects that are currently active or have to start date for construction that falls within the scope of the 5 year projections window. There are many other project that are at various stages of the planning process that could possibly become active in the near future. However, due to the fact that no known start date exist for these projects they are not included in the 5 year projection window as Davis Demographics refrains basing its forecast on speculation. It is important to understand that these units are taken into account in the buildout/maturation projection. The maturation projection takes into account all existing units, planned units and any potential units. To determine what the district could possibly look like at build out. 2,240 total units are currently expected to be completed over the next 5 years. In addition to these units there is potential for another 32,286 units based on the current zoning and allowable densities. These numbers may seem a bit overwhelming but are reasonable given the amount of land that is available for residential development. .


16April 13, 2017 Section Two – Page

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LIST1

RESIDENTIAL SUMMARY BY STUDY AREA

1 Projects with known start times or currently active. Planned projects without start dates are included in the buildout

projections.

CA-120 E CA-120

CA-99 NE Louise Ave

W Yosemite Ave

S Ma

in S

t

N Main St

S Au

stin

Rd

E Louise Ave

S Ai

rpor

t Way

N Austin Rd

Cottage Ave

Yosemite Ave

S Union Rd

S Ma

ntec

a Rd

NUn

ion

Rd

E Yosemite Ave

W Louise Ave

ST120

ST120

ST99

MantecaManteca

LathropLathrop

§̈¦5

VISTA VERDE

SUNDANCE

OLEANDERESTATES 1&3

MILNERTERRACE

BLOSSOM GROVE

EVANSESTATES

NO. 2

EVANSESTATES

ATHERTON 2

DE JONGESTATES

TESOROAPARTMENTS

ALMAAPARTMENTS

DUTRA ESTATES

MONTE BELLOESTATES

WOODWARDESTATES

BELLAGOSHORES

1 in = 1 miles0 1 2 3 4Miles

Map Created: 3/23/2017

Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS,NOAA

Tract StatusActiveElementary Boundaries

TracyTracy RiponRipon

SalidaSalida

LathropLathrop MantecaManteca

Del RioDel Rio

FarmingtonFarmingtonFrench CampFrench Camp

San JoaquinSan Joaquin

StanislausStanislaus

Manteca Unified School DistrictProjects with Known Start Dates or Currently Active

17


19April 13, 2017 Section Three - Page

SECTION THREE – ATTENDANCE MATRICES

Two Attendance Matrices have been included to provide a better understanding of where students reside and where they attend school. Remember, DDP projections are based upon where the students reside, not the students school of enrollment. This method allows DDP to provide the most accurate forecast of where shifts in student population may occur and changes to future facilities (if necessary) should be located. Therefore, since the projections are based upon where the students reside, the figures we use as a base for each school's resident projection may be slightly higher or lower than the actual reported enrollment for each school. The best way to plan for future facilities is to know where the next group of students will be coming from, not necessarily which school they are currently attending

Attendance matrices act as a check and balance for student accounting. Illustrating where the students reside (in what School of Residence) based upon their geocoded address and which school they attend (School of Attendance) based upon District provided student data. It is essential to show how the students used in the projections match up to the District’s records of enrollment for each school. Furthermore, intra-district transferring patterns can be determined by comparing School of Residence data to the School of Attendance data.

READING THE MATRIX

Starting with the K-8 Elementary School Attendance Matrix, let's begin with August Knodt as an example. Following down the first column with the August Knodt heading, there are 677 K-8 grade students attending August Knodt and reside in the August Knodt attendance area. Continuing downward, 0 students attending August Knodt that reside in the Brock Elliott attendance area. Next it shows that 6 student attends August Knodt and resides in the French Camp attendance area, and so on.

The row Out of District refers to students living completely outside of the Manteca Unified School District, but attending one of the District's schools. There is 1 Out of District student attending August Knodt. Special Education refers to special education students attending August Knodt, there are 45 Special Education students attending August Knodt. Finally, Unmatched refers to students not geocoded due to address problems. There are 0 unmatched students attending August Knodt. Total Attendance is the total number of students attending a school regardless of where they reside, and reflects the District’s enrollment counts for each school. There are 835 students attending August Knodt.

The next step is to read across the matrix, beginning with the August Knodt attendance area row. We know 677 represents the total number of K-8 grade students residing and attending August Knodt. The next column, Brock Elliott, refers to the number of K-8 grade students residing in the August Knodt attendance area, but attend Brock Elliott there are 0 students residing in the August Knodt attendance area but attending Brock Elliott.

The Total Resident K-8 column is the total number of students living in that particular attendance area. There are 739 K-8 students residing in the August Knodt attendance area. The Total Attendance row is the actual number of students used as the base or actual number for each attendance area in the 2016/17 projections.

What quickly becomes apparent after reviewing the matrix is that there are 3 attendance areas that have resident student populations that exceed the physical capacities of their campuses. These sites include Mossdale, Sequoia and Veritas Elementary Schools. The district has been able to manage the problem by overflowing students other campuses with available capacity but review of the enrollment figures shows that Lathrope and Mossdale Elementary Schools have enrollments that exceed their physical capacities of the sites.

Manteca Unified School District Fall 2016 Report

RESIDENT K-8 TOTALS

SCHO

OL C

APAC

ITY

AUG

UST

KN

ODT

K8

BRO

CK E

LLIO

TT K

8

FREN

CH C

AMP

K8

GEO

RGE

KOM

URE

K8

*

GEO

RGE

McP

ARLA

ND

K8

GO

LDEN

WES

T K8

GREA

T VA

LLEY

SCH

OO

L K8

JOSE

PH W

IDM

ER JR

K8

JOSH

UA

COW

ELL K

8

LATH

ROP

K8

LIN

COLN

K8

MO

SSDA

LE K

8

NEI

L HA

FLEY

K8

NEW

HAV

EN K

8

NIL

E G

ARDE

N K

8

SEQ

UO

IA K

8

SHAS

TA K

8

STEL

LA B

ROCK

MAN

K8

VERI

TAS

K8

WAL

TER

WO

ODW

ARD

K8

AUGUST KNODT K8 739 1000 677 0 2 16 0 0 24 3 0 3 0 6 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 62

BROCK ELLIOTT K8 829 942 0 754 3 0 13 5 0 0 4 1 0 1 3 0 12 7 7 9 4 6 75

FRENCH CAMP K8 656 1000 6 0 581 1 13 0 9 11 2 3 1 3 7 12 1 2 0 2 2 0 75

GEORGE KOMURE K8 924 1000 32 0 5 844 0 0 35 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 80

* GEORGE McPARLAND K8 967 1318 0 2 2 1 902 6 1 0 3 2 5 2 15 5 4 1 0 11 4 1 65

GOLDEN WEST K8 541 806 0 2 0 0 12 425 0 0 6 0 12 1 44 2 5 5 7 14 5 1 116

* GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL K8 1148 1416 69 0 5 22 1 0 1032 4 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 116

JOSEPH WIDMER JR K8 797 986 3 0 1 0 5 1 0 751 0 27 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 46

JOSHUA COWELL K8 488 796 0 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 416 2 9 1 2 25 0 4 6 6 7 2 72

LATHROP K8 821 924 1 3 3 0 4 2 0 21 0 759 0 10 5 0 3 0 1 6 1 2 62

LINCOLN K8 562 790 0 5 0 0 4 11 3 0 6 0 457 0 5 1 4 15 35 4 4 8 105

MOSSDALE K8 990 920 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 2 952 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 38

NEIL HAFLEY K8 640 940 0 1 2 0 20 13 0 2 2 3 10 0 572 3 1 0 3 4 3 1 68

NEW HAVEN K8 614 726 0 3 1 0 19 11 0 0 11 2 2 1 27 503 10 0 5 12 0 7 111

NILE GARDEN K8 349 756 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 324 1 0 4 5 8 25

SEQUOIA K8 918 872 0 21 0 2 9 15 0 0 5 1 16 2 15 4 44 693 6 40 32 13 225

SHASTA K8 738 980 0 2 1 0 6 13 1 3 33 0 25 4 13 3 4 3 614 1 5 7 124

* STELLA BROCKMAN K8 681 1142 0 1 0 0 10 4 0 0 1 1 3 2 4 0 10 8 1 623 4 9 58

VERITAS K8 933 860 1 4 1 1 9 11 0 5 4 2 5 2 7 4 59 4 1 41 709 63 224

WALTER WOODWARD K8 705 900 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 2 12 0 1 3 17 658 47

789 805 607 888 1032 522 1105 815 499 827 554 995 726 564 495 745 691 787 803 791

SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS 45 26 0 40 16 41 0 39 63 50 44 28 50 23 16 0 53 88 35 60

OUT OF DISTRICT STUDENTS 1 5 5 2 6 0 0 5 0 1 5 9 1 5 3 7 0 4 0 13

INDEPENDENT STUDY STUDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION STUDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TRANSITIONAL KINDERGARDEN STUDENTS 0 0 2 0 28 1 0 36 44 55 44 0 21 0 0 45 0 82 0 0

UN-MATCHED STUDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL ENROLLMENT 835 836 614 930 1,082 564 1,105 895 606 933 647 1,032 798 592 515 797 744 961 838 864

TRANSFER STUDENTS 112 51 26 44 130 97 73 64 83 68 97 43 154 61 171 52 77 164 94 133

1000 942 1000 1000 1362 806 1416 986 796 924 790 920 940 726 756 872 980 1142 860 900

* indicate additnal capacity due to annex sites

ENROLLMENT SUBTOTAL:

= SCHOOL ENROLLMENT UNDER CAPACITY. = SCHOOL ENROLLMENT OVER CAPACITY.

SCHO

OL

OF

RESI

DEN

CE

FALL 2016-2017 K-8 SPANS TRANSFER MATRIX

INTR

ADIS

TRIC

T TR

ANSF

ERS

SCHOOLS WITH BOUNDARIES

0

0

358

717

72

1

16,188

1,794

SCHOOL CAPACITY:

= WITHIN 10% OF CAPACITY.

Davis Demographics Planning Inc. 16 March 2017 Page 20

Manteca Unified School District Fall 2016 Report

RESIDENT 9-12 TOTALS

SCHO

OL

CAPA

CITY

EAST

UN

ION

HS

LATH

ROP

HS

MAN

TECA

HS

SIER

RA H

S

WES

TON

RAN

CH H

S

EAST UNION HIGH SCHOOL 1356 1800 1261 18 33 39 5 95

LATHROP HIGH SCHOOL 1210 1741 23 1160 6 20 1 50

MANTECA HIGH SCHOOL 1843 1703 214 17 1388 221 3 455

SIERRA HIGH SCHOOL 1154 1800 26 12 42 1073 1 81

WESTON RANCH HIGH SCHOOL 1153 1533 11 18 1 1 1122 31

274 65 82 281 10

SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS 0 53 77 60 73

OUT OF DISTRICT STUDENTS 0 11 12 7 4

INDEPENDENT STUDY STUDENTS 0 0 0 0 0

ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION STUDENTS 0 0 0 0 0

UN-MATCHED STUDENTS 1 0 0 0 0

TOTAL ENROLLMENT 1536 1289 1559 1421 1209

TRANSFER STUDENTS 274 65 82 281 10

1800 1741 1703 1800 1533

= SCHOOL ENROLLMENT UNDER CAPACITY.

= SCHOOL ENROLLMENT OVER CAPACITY.

FALL 2016-2017 HIGH SCHOOL (9-12) TRANSFER MATRIX

INTR

ADIS

TRIC

T TR

ANSF

ERS

SCHO

OL

OF

RESI

DEN

CE

SCHOOLS WITH BOUNDARIES

ENROLLMENT SUBTOTAL:

SCHOOL CAPACITY:

263

34

1

7,014

712

0

0

Davis Demographics Planning Inc. 16 March 2017 Page 21


22April 13, 2017 Section Four - Page

SECTION FOUR – DISTRICT WIDE STUDENT POPULATION PROJECTION

The student population is projected out five years for each of the study areas, attendance areas and for the Manteca Unified School District. The District Wide Summary enables the District to see a broad overview of future population shifts and what impact these shifts may have on existing and future facilities. Each attendance area is summarized to give a more local view of population changes and identify variances in the district. The study area listings enable the District to monitor student population growth or decline in neighborhood areas within the District.

Together, these projection summaries, present the means for identifying the timing of future population shifts and overall facility adjustments needed to accommodate these shifts. At any time, study areas and their projected resident students can be shifted between schools to assist in balan44cing enrollment, school consolidation among various other analyses.



District Wide Projection



District Wide Projection Trends

The Manteca Unified School District is project to continue to grow over the next five years, with the majority of the growth at the elementary grade level. The K-12 student population is projected to grow by 1,327 students by 2021. The elementary (grades K-8) student population is expected to increase by 950 students. The high school (grades 9-12) student population will increase 377 students by 2021. This growth will be attributed to key factors. First and most important will be the construction of new resident units. Improvements to the housing market and overall economy have caused an increase in development activity throughout the region. A total of 1889 single family units and 351 apartments currently expected to be constructed between now and 2021. Many more units are at different points of the planning process and even more projects can come online from land that is zoned for residential development but plans have yet to be submitted to planners. Only projects with known start times are included in the 5 years projections all other projects and potential units are included in the maturation portion of the projections. Also contributing to growth are rising birth factors. State records indicate that the number of births reported in the area have been climbing since 2012. This will have the effect of causing the District to see an increase in the size of incoming kindergarten classes beginning as soon as 2018 helping the District to grow its resident student population. Additionally the District has been successful in retaining its student population as students progress from one grade to the next. This metric is captured in the mobility calculation and shows that there neither an influx or significant outflow of students into or out the District’s existing housing stock. In the near term capacity will become a growing concern to the District as development activity continues to generate new students. To this point the District has been successful in mitigating the impact of growth at the elementary level by overflowing students from impacted areas of the District to areas with excess capacity. This method of addressing growth will become less effective as the District’s elementary student population continues to grow. For this reason it will be important for the District to being serious discussions to determine how best add capacity and redistribute the resident student population. The District will have seral options to address the concerns that include but are not limited to adding capacity in the form of new comprehensive facilities, adding modular units to existing sites, adding new classroom wings and redrawing attendance boundaries. In addition to the information provide in this report the District will have access to the GIS data that the report is based upon that can be used to evaluate many of these possible scenarios and their potential impacts. District staff currently plans to begin the process of considering all solutions in an effort to determine how best to address the District current and future capacity concerns. This will be even more critical for the District in the future beyond to 2021 as the District continues its progress to maturity, a point in time in which all land zoned for residential development is development and built out. At fully maturity the District can expect to see as many as 50,484 TK-12 students. This amounts to a gain of 26,576 additional students at maturity. The elementary level will account for 18,105 of these students while the remaining 8,461 student expected by full maturity will be split amongst the high school grades. To determine the total number of facilities needed out build out/maturity requires that the District come up with a guide line for the size of new facilities as this number would ultimately determine how many facility the District will ultimate need. As time progress the District should update their projections on an annual basis to determine which if any of the new facilities will be needed over a 5 year period of time. Doing so will alert the district as to when and where a new facility will need to be located. It is important to understand the projections in this report are based upon factors and developments plans as they existed in Fall of 2016. These factors are all subject to changes in market conditions that can change quickly. As such it is always the recommendation of Davis Demographics that District’s revisit their projections on an annual basis to ensure that they latest trends are captured and applied to the population forecast.


26April 13, 2017 Section Five - Page

SECTION FIVE – ATTENDANCE AREA PROJECTIONS BY RESIDENCE Elementary School Projections by Residence

Attendance Area August Knodt ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 89.0 87.9 90.2 93.3 93.3 93.3 86.3 1 90.0 82.8 81.8 83.8 86.7 86.7 86.3 2 74.0 90.9 83.6 82.6 84.7 87.6 86.3 3 86.0 76.2 93.6 86.1 85.1 87.2 86.3 4 80.0 82.6 73.2 89.9 82.7 81.7 86.3 5 85.0 78.4 80.9 71.7 88.1 81.0 86.3 6 82.0 83.3 76.8 79.3 70.3 86.3 86.3 7 68.0 82.0 83.3 76.8 79.3 70.3 92.4 8 85.0 70.7 85.3 86.6 79.9 82.5 92.4 K-8 739.0 734.8 748.7 750.1 750.1 756.6 788.9 Attendance Area Brock Elliott ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 85.0 84.0 86.1 89.1 89.1 89.1 86.6 1 76.0 82.5 81.5 83.5 86.4 86.4 86.6 2 72.0 76.0 82.5 81.5 83.5 86.4 86.6 3 88.0 74.2 78.3 84.9 83.9 86.0 86.6 4 105.0 87.1 73.4 77.5 84.1 83.1 86.6 5 106.0 113.4 94.1 79.3 83.7 90.8 86.6 6 105.0 106.0 113.4 94.1 79.3 83.7 86.6 7 93.0 111.3 112.4 120.2 99.7 84.0 94.2 8 99.0 91.1 109.1 110.1 117.8 97.7 94.2 K-8 829.0 825.6 830.8 820.2 807.5 787.2 794.6 Attendance Area French Camp ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 54.0 53.4 54.7 56.6 56.6 56.6 306.2 1 79.0 50.8 50.2 51.4 53.2 53.2 306.2 2 69.0 76.6 49.2 48.6 49.9 51.6 306.2 3 76.0 68.3 75.9 48.7 48.2 49.4 306.2 4 83.0 69.2 62.2 69.0 44.4 43.8 306.2 5 83.0 84.7 70.5 63.4 70.4 45.2 306.2 6 82.0 79.7 81.3 67.7 60.9 67.6 306.2 7 66.0 78.7 76.5 78.0 65.0 58.4 300.3 8 64.0 66.0 78.7 76.5 78.0 65.0 300.3 K-8 656.0 627.4 599.2 559.9 526.6 490.8 2744.0 Attendance Area George Komure ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 103.0 101.8 104.3 107.9 107.9 107.9 116.8 1 99.0 96.8 95.7 98.1 101.5 101.5 116.8 2 80.0 97.0 94.9 93.7 96.1 99.4 116.8 3 98.0 78.4 95.1 93.0 91.9 94.2 116.8 4 87.0 98.0 78.4 95.1 93.0 91.9 116.8 5 111.0 87.0 98.0 78.4 95.1 93.0 116.8 6 111.0 114.3 89.6 100.9 80.8 97.9 116.8 7 113.0 113.2 116.6 91.4 103.0 82.4 125.0 8 122.0 114.1 114.4 117.8 92.3 104.0 125.0 K-8 924.0 900.6 887.0 876.3 861.6 872.2 1067.6



Attendance Area George McParland ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 114.0 112.6 115.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 111.5 1 108.0 104.9 103.6 106.2 109.9 109.9 111.5 2 100.0 115.6 112.2 110.9 113.7 117.6 111.5 3 106.0 101.0 116.7 113.3 112.0 114.8 111.5 4 111.0 106.0 101.0 116.7 113.3 112.0 111.5 5 107.0 112.1 107.1 102.0 117.9 114.5 111.5 6 104.0 111.3 116.6 111.3 106.1 122.6 111.5 7 101.0 106.1 113.5 118.9 113.6 108.2 115.8 8 116.0 106.1 111.4 119.2 124.9 119.2 115.8 K-8 967.0 975.7 997.6 1018.0 1030.9 1038.3 1012.1 Attendance Area Golden West ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 66.0 65.2 66.9 69.2 69.2 69.2 58.5 1 68.0 66.7 65.9 67.5 69.9 69.9 58.5 2 54.0 62.6 61.3 60.6 62.1 64.3 58.5 3 55.0 50.8 58.8 57.6 57.0 58.4 58.5 4 68.0 53.9 49.7 57.6 56.5 55.8 58.5 5 63.0 69.4 55.0 50.7 58.8 57.6 58.5 6 54.0 60.5 66.6 52.8 48.7 56.4 58.5 7 51.0 51.8 58.1 63.9 50.7 46.8 58.2 8 62.0 51.5 52.4 58.6 64.6 51.2 58.2 K-8 541.0 532.4 534.7 538.5 537.5 529.6 525.9 Attendance Area Great Valley School Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 130.0 128.4 131.7 136.2 136.2 136.2 136.9 1 120.0 122.2 120.7 123.8 128.1 128.1 136.9 2 108.0 122.4 124.6 123.1 126.3 130.6 136.9 3 120.0 111.2 126.1 128.4 126.8 130.1 136.9 4 119.0 121.2 112.4 127.3 129.7 128.1 136.9 5 140.0 120.2 122.4 113.5 128.6 131.0 136.9 6 138.0 138.6 119.0 121.2 112.3 127.3 136.9 7 143.0 143.5 144.1 123.7 126.0 116.8 146.6 8 130.0 144.4 145.0 145.6 125.0 127.3 146.6 K-8 1148.0 1152.1 1146.0 1142.8 1139.0 1155.5 1251.5 Attendance Area Joseph Widmer Jr ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 86.0 85.0 87.1 90.1 90.1 90.1 88.4 1 70.0 78.3 77.3 79.3 82.0 82.0 88.4 2 78.0 75.6 84.5 83.5 85.6 88.6 88.4 3 91.0 78.0 75.6 84.5 83.5 85.6 88.4 4 93.0 94.6 81.1 78.6 87.9 86.8 88.4 5 100.0 91.1 92.7 79.5 77.1 86.1 88.4 6 95.0 102.0 93.0 94.6 81.1 78.6 88.4 7 104.0 96.9 104.0 94.8 96.5 82.7 108.7 8 80.0 100.9 94.0 100.9 92.0 93.6 108.7 K-8 797.0 802.4 789.3 785.8 775.8 774.1 836.2



Attendance Area Joshua Cowell ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 70.0 69.2 70.9 73.4 73.4 73.4 130.0 1 53.0 56.7 56.0 57.4 59.4 59.4 130.0 2 44.0 53.0 56.7 56.0 57.4 59.4 130.0 3 50.0 42.7 51.4 55.0 54.3 55.7 130.0 4 47.0 54.0 46.1 55.5 59.4 58.7 130.0 5 47.0 40.9 47.0 40.1 48.3 51.7 130.0 6 58.0 46.1 40.1 46.0 39.3 47.3 130.0 7 50.0 63.2 50.2 43.7 50.2 42.8 127.8 8 69.0 50.0 63.2 50.2 43.7 50.2 127.8 K-8 488.0 475.8 481.6 477.3 485.4 498.6 1165.6 Attendance Area Lathrop ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 96.0 94.8 97.2 100.6 100.6 100.6 370.0 1 94.0 91.2 90.1 92.4 95.6 95.6 370.0 2 86.0 92.1 89.4 88.3 90.5 93.7 370.0 3 83.0 86.0 92.1 89.4 88.3 90.5 370.0 4 73.0 82.2 85.1 91.2 88.5 87.4 370.0 5 115.0 73.7 83.0 86.0 92.1 89.4 370.0 6 103.0 118.4 75.9 85.5 88.6 94.9 370.0 7 70.0 100.9 116.1 74.4 83.8 86.8 367.7 8 101.0 76.3 110.0 126.5 81.1 91.3 367.7 K-8 821.0 815.6 838.9 834.3 809.1 830.2 3325.4 Attendance Area Lincoln ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 75.0 74.1 76.0 78.6 78.6 78.6 84.7 1 58.0 66.0 65.2 66.9 69.2 69.2 84.7 2 71.0 56.8 64.7 63.9 65.5 67.8 84.7 3 49.0 63.2 50.6 57.6 56.9 58.3 84.7 4 72.0 51.0 65.7 52.6 59.9 59.1 84.7 5 66.0 69.8 49.4 63.7 51.0 58.1 84.7 6 63.0 62.7 66.3 47.0 60.6 48.5 84.7 7 48.0 61.1 60.8 64.4 45.6 58.7 84.1 8 60.0 45.6 58.1 57.8 61.1 43.3 84.1 K-8 562.0 550.3 556.8 552.5 548.4 541.6 761.1 Attendance Area Mossdale ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 146.0 144.2 147.9 153.0 153.0 153.0 180.0 1 114.0 140.2 138.5 142.0 146.9 146.9 180.0 2 105.0 124.3 152.8 150.9 154.8 160.1 180.0 3 99.0 109.2 129.2 158.9 157.0 161.0 180.0 4 98.0 101.0 111.4 131.8 162.1 160.1 180.0 5 120.0 107.8 111.1 122.5 145.0 178.3 180.0 6 106.0 123.6 111.0 114.4 126.2 149.3 180.0 7 89.0 104.9 122.4 109.9 113.3 124.9 161.0 8 113.0 92.6 109.1 127.3 114.3 117.8 161.0 K-8 990.0 1047.8 1133.4 1210.7 1272.6 1351.4 1582.0



Attendance Area Neil Hafley ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 70.0 69.2 70.9 74.6 74.0 74.0 84.5 1 66.0 65.8 65.0 67.8 70.1 69.6 84.5 2 83.0 66.7 66.5 66.9 68.5 70.8 84.5 3 57.0 82.2 66.0 67.0 66.2 67.8 84.5 4 80.0 54.7 78.9 64.5 64.3 63.6 84.5 5 83.0 79.2 54.2 79.3 63.9 63.7 84.5 6 81.0 85.5 81.6 57.1 81.7 65.8 84.5 7 59.0 81.8 86.3 83.2 57.6 82.5 83.5 8 61.0 64.3 89.2 95.0 90.7 62.8 83.5 K-8 640.0 649.4 658.6 655.4 637.0 620.6 758.5 Attendance Area New Haven ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 62.0 61.3 62.8 65.0 65.0 65.0 278.9 1 47.0 60.8 60.0 61.5 63.7 63.7 278.9 2 67.0 49.8 64.4 63.6 65.2 67.5 278.9 3 90.0 61.6 45.8 59.3 58.5 60.0 278.9 4 67.0 89.1 61.0 45.4 58.7 58.0 278.9 5 71.0 69.0 91.8 62.9 46.7 60.4 278.9 6 70.0 69.6 67.6 89.9 61.6 45.8 278.9 7 69.0 68.6 68.2 66.3 88.1 60.4 278.0 8 71.0 66.9 66.5 66.1 64.3 85.5 278.0 K-8 614.0 596.7 588.1 580.0 571.8 566.3 2508.3 Attendance Area Nile Garden ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 43.0 45.7 48.3 54.1 57.1 60.1 705.2 1 51.0 41.6 43.8 48.5 53.7 56.5 705.2 2 43.0 51.0 41.9 46.5 50.9 55.8 705.2 3 37.0 44.4 51.8 45.7 50.1 54.3 705.2 4 32.0 35.4 41.7 50.6 45.2 49.0 705.2 5 39.0 29.6 32.2 39.8 47.2 42.7 705.2 6 31.0 46.1 35.5 41.3 49.5 57.6 705.2 7 34.0 36.1 51.6 43.4 49.5 58.1 704.0 8 39.0 31.7 33.2 48.8 41.8 47.0 704.0 K-8 349.0 361.6 380.0 418.7 445.0 481.1 6344.4 Attendance Area Sequoia ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 106.0 104.7 107.4 111.1 111.1 111.1 113.8 1 88.0 99.6 98.4 100.9 104.4 104.4 113.8 2 107.0 93.3 105.6 104.4 107.0 110.7 113.8 3 102.0 107.0 93.3 105.6 104.4 107.0 113.8 4 103.0 105.1 110.2 96.1 108.8 107.5 113.8 5 104.0 103.0 105.1 110.2 96.1 108.8 113.8 6 100.0 103.0 102.0 104.0 109.1 95.1 113.8 7 112.0 108.0 111.2 110.1 112.3 117.8 115.8 8 96.0 113.1 109.1 112.3 111.2 113.5 115.8 K-8 918.0 936.8 942.3 954.7 964.4 975.9 1028.2



Attendance Area Shasta ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 99.0 97.8 100.3 103.8 103.8 103.8 99.5 1 79.0 91.1 90.0 92.3 95.5 95.5 99.5 2 83.0 76.6 88.3 87.3 89.5 92.6 99.5 3 85.0 83.8 77.4 89.2 88.2 90.4 99.5 4 100.0 83.3 82.2 75.8 87.4 86.4 99.5 5 81.0 98.0 81.6 80.5 74.3 85.7 99.5 6 74.0 82.6 100.0 83.3 82.1 75.8 99.5 7 80.0 69.6 77.7 94.0 78.3 77.2 85.1 8 57.0 77.6 67.5 75.3 91.1 75.9 85.1 K-8 738.0 760.4 765.0 781.5 790.2 783.3 866.7 Attendance Area Stella Brockman ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 87.0 86.0 89.0 104.9 100.2 99.9 127.3 1 73.0 79.2 79.0 93.1 96.7 91.5 127.3 2 67.0 74.5 81.7 94.2 96.3 99.0 127.3 3 85.0 64.3 72.3 91.2 91.7 92.8 127.3 4 73.0 81.6 62.6 82.2 88.8 88.4 127.3 5 85.0 73.0 82.5 75.9 83.5 89.2 127.3 6 76.0 89.2 77.6 100.6 81.1 88.1 127.3 7 58.0 74.5 88.4 85.2 99.9 79.9 127.2 8 77.0 60.3 78.4 101.6 90.0 104.3 127.2 K-8 681.0 682.6 711.5 828.9 828.2 833.1 1145.5 Attendance Area Veritas ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 117.0 120.9 127.6 145.1 148.3 154.6 274.4 1 124.0 110.0 114.4 129.5 140.2 143.5 274.4 2 95.0 122.8 110.4 124.2 133.2 143.9 274.4 3 92.0 101.3 130.3 128.1 136.2 145.9 274.4 4 95.0 93.4 103.2 140.8 133.2 141.5 274.4 5 118.0 101.3 100.6 120.7 153.0 145.8 274.4 6 95.0 136.8 119.3 129.8 145.8 182.3 274.4 7 101.0 97.4 138.9 128.6 136.5 152.7 273.8 8 96.0 109.6 106.9 156.8 143.8 152.5 273.8 K-8 933.0 993.5 1051.6 1203.6 1270.2 1362.7 2468.4 Attendance Area Walter Woodward ES Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 69.0 68.2 69.9 72.3 72.3 72.3 79.3 1 69.0 68.3 67.5 69.2 71.6 71.6 79.3 2 67.0 69.7 69.0 68.2 69.9 72.3 79.3 3 74.0 69.7 72.5 71.8 70.9 72.7 79.3 4 91.0 74.7 70.4 73.2 72.5 71.6 79.3 5 81.0 95.5 78.5 73.9 76.9 76.1 79.3 6 89.0 81.0 95.5 78.5 73.9 76.9 79.3 7 73.0 79.2 72.1 85.0 69.8 65.8 85.3 8 92.0 75.2 81.6 74.3 87.6 71.9 85.3 K-8 705.0 681.5 677.0 666.4 665.4 651.2 725.7



Elementary Attendance Area Student Population Projection Trends

The overall elementary (grades K-8) student population is expected to increase by 950 students at the end of the projection period in 2021. The projected growth for the District will be attributed to residential development currently planned for the region. Areas that will see new units constructed in the coming years are expected to see the largest gains while other areas will actually be in decline. By 2021 11 of the District’s 20 elementary attendance areas will see net gains in their resident student populations. Unfortunately for the District the areas expected to see the most growth also happen to be areas that are already facing capacity concerns. The Veritas Elementary attendance area is projected to add 429 students over the next 5 years brining its resident student population to a total 1,362 students by 2021. The Mossdale attendance area will also see significant growth that will bring its resident student further beyond its capacity. By 2021 the attendance are will see as many as 1,351 students. In each case we see growth in attendance areas that area already hosing resident student populations that are larger than capacity of their campuses. With more growth projected in the coming years the District will need to begin to taking steps to address these growing capacity concerns in these areas. To this point the District has been able to deal with the issue by overflowing students to areas that have capacity but the amount of growth expected in these two regions will likely prevent this from continuing to be plausible solution in the coming years.

In the long term capacity eventually becomes an issue for the French Camp, George Komure, Joshua, Lathrop New Haven and Neil Garden attendances areas. In each case additional capacity will need to be added to accommodate the additional students projected for the District once the region reaches full maturity. The near term projections indicate that the need for additional capacity will arise in the Mossdale, and Veritas attendance areas. The District has several options to consider to add additional capacity. Capacity can be added to the District by adding modular units, additional wings of classrooms or a new facility all together. Redistricting is also a solution that may prove plausible in some instances to move excess capacity from once to a site lacking it. The district currently has plans in place that will allow staff to consider each options viability and can use the data provided in the report as well as the software provided by Davis Demographics that will allow scenarios to be considered.

*indicates annex campuses

Ro b e r t sI s l a n d

Manteca ParkGolf Course

StocktonMetropol itan

Airport


CA-120

CA

-99

N

E Louise Ave

E Roth Rd

S E

l D

or a

do

St

Lathrop Rd

W Yosemite Ave

Arch Airport Rd

N M

ain

St

S A

us

tin

Rd

E Lathrop Rd

S A

irpo

rt Wa

y

SA

irpo

rtW

ay

E Mariposa Rd

Arch Rd

Co

ttag

e A

ve

Yosemite Ave

S U

nio

n R

d

Ro

be

r ts

Rd

W Mathews Rd

Au

sti

n R

d

E Yosemite Ave

W Louise Ave

EFrench Camp

Rd

S M

an

tec

a R

d

W Howard Rd

S A

us

tin R

d

French Camp Rd

SM

ain

St

ST120

ST99

ST99

French CampFrench Camp

MantecaManteca

LathropLathrop

§̈¦5

Lathrop ES

JosephWidmerJr ES

GeorgeMcParland ES

GreatValleySchool

NeilHafley ES

WalterWoodward ES

Mossdale ES

FrenchCamp ES

AugustKnodt ES

Lincoln ES

Veritas ES

Sequoia ES

GoldenWest ES

StellaBrockman ES

Shasta ES

JoshuaCowell ES

NileGarden ES

GeorgeKomure ES

New Haven ES

BrockElliott ES

MantecaCommunityDay ES

Manteca Unified School District2016-17 Elementary School Attendance Boundaries

0 1 2 3 4Miles

1 in = 1 milesMap Created: 3/23/2017

TracyTracy RiponRipon

SalidaSalida

ModestoModesto

LathropLathrop

MantecaManteca

StocktonStockton

Del RioDel Rio

EscalonEscalon

KennedyKennedy

VernalisVernalis

FarmingtonFarmington


Country ClubCountry Club

5 Schools AUGUST KNODT

BROCK ELLIOT

FRENCH CAMP

GEOGRE KOMURE

GOLDEN WEST

GREAT VALLEY

JOSEPH WIDMER JR.

JOSHUA COWELL

LATHROP

LINCOLN

MCPARLAND

MOSSDALE

NEIL HAFLEY

NEW HAVEN

NILE GARDEN

SEQUOIA

SHASTA

STELLA BROCKMAN

VERITAS

WALTER E. WOODWARD

Projected Resident StudentsFall 2016 Fall 2019 Fall 2023 Fall 2026 Maturation Fall 2016 Fall 2019 Fall 2023 Fall 2026 Maturation

August Knodt ES 739.0 750.1 774.1 779.3 788.9 Lincoln ES 562.0 552.5 550.1 564.9 761.1Brock Elliott ES 829.0 820.2 803.8 825.8 794.6 Mossdale ES 990.0 1210.7 1493.9 1557.5 1582.0French Camp ES 656.0 559.9 454.3 437.8 2744.0 Neil Hafley ES 640.0 655.4 618.7 626.9 758.5George Komure ES 924.0 876.3 891.0 903.8 1067.6 New Haven ES 614.0 580.0 541.0 563.0 2508.3George McParland ES 967.0 1018.0 1070.9 1085.9 1012.1 Nile Garden ES 349.0 418.7 451.8 413.2 6344.4Golden West ES 541.0 538.5 543.9 551.4 525.9 Sequoia ES 918.0 954.7 987.6 1018.7 1028.2Great Valley School 1148.0 1142.8 1194.6 1217.8 1251.5 Shasta ES 738.0 781.5 801.5 825.2 866.7Joseph Widmer Jr. ES 797.0 785.8 782.9 805.8 836.2 Stella Brokman ES 681.0 828.9 827.6 822.4 1145.5Joshua Cowel ES 488.0 477.3 521.2 533.2 1165.6 Veritas ES 933.0 1203.6 1352.5 1266.7 2468.4Lathrop ES 821.0 834.3 849.2 860.6 3325.4 Walter Woodward ES 705.0 666.4 657.8 668.4 725.7



High School Projections by Residence

Attendance Area East Union High School Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 319.0 315.2 324.0 337.4 337.5 337.3 802.7 1 317.0 301.2 298.4 308.3 319.7 318.9 802.7 2 328.0 324.3 310.9 309.7 318.6 329.4 802.7 3 344.0 321.6 320.0 307.2 304.8 312.6 802.7 4 356.0 333.7 312.2 312.2 300.3 297.1 802.7 5 362.0 360.3 339.4 318.3 317.1 304.1 802.7 6 348.0 363.3 362.7 342.9 322.1 320.0 802.7 7 302.0 345.8 362.0 362.8 341.9 321.4 799.2 8 325.0 310.4 357.4 376.0 375.9 350.9 799.2 9 342.0 320.4 306.2 352.8 370.6 369.8 811.0 10 380.0 351.2 330.8 317.6 364.1 381.1 819.0 11 362.0 340.1 314.5 298.2 285.4 325.5 804.2 12 272.0 332.5 314.9 290.8 275.7 262.6 795.5 9-12 1356.0 1344.2 1266.4 1259.4 1295.8 1339.0 3229.7 Attendance Area Lathrop HS Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 328.0 324.1 332.3 343.7 343.7 343.7 638.4 1 278.0 309.6 305.9 313.6 324.5 324.5 638.4 2 269.0 292.0 326.7 322.8 330.9 342.4 638.4 3 273.0 273.2 297.0 332.8 328.8 337.1 638.4 4 264.0 277.8 277.6 301.6 338.4 334.4 638.4 5 335.0 272.7 286.8 288.0 314.2 353.8 638.4 6 304.0 344.0 279.9 294.5 295.9 322.8 638.4 7 263.0 302.8 342.5 279.2 293.5 294.4 637.5 8 294.0 269.7 313.2 354.7 287.4 302.7 637.5 9 307.0 308.8 283.4 328.8 372.4 302.1 668.1 10 331.0 308.6 310.9 285.5 330.0 374.0 674.7 11 300.0 313.1 291.3 292.9 270.8 311.6 662.5 12 272.0 277.6 290.7 269.9 271.9 250.5 655.3 9-12 1210.0 1208.1 1176.3 1177.1 1245.1 1238.2 2660.6 Attendance Area Manteca HS Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 519.0 512.8 525.7 556.3 557.5 561.8 660.8 1 454.0 477.3 471.5 494.6 517.6 519.2 660.8 2 455.0 450.5 474.6 480.7 497.9 521.0 660.8 3 438.0 446.5 443.3 478.9 479.7 497.4 660.8 4 495.0 443.8 452.3 460.2 491.3 492.2 660.8 5 463.0 490.6 438.3 459.9 462.0 492.5 660.8 6 453.0 461.3 488.0 450.7 467.2 472.6 660.8 7 432.0 447.7 455.0 487.2 452.0 468.7 651.0 8 451.0 431.8 447.2 464.2 493.9 460.8 651.0 9 511.0 475.0 458.5 483.9 502.6 535.4 668.1 10 473.0 507.4 471.4 465.3 487.7 507.7 674.7 11 419.0 432.4 464.2 440.6 431.9 453.5 662.5 12 440.0 401.7 414.6 454.3 429.6 421.1 655.3 9-12 1843.0 1816.5 1808.7 1844.1 1851.8 1917.7 2660.6



Attendance Area Sierra HS Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 279.0 284.2 296.4 323.4 322.9 328.0 1077.0 1 268.0 265.4 270.6 293.0 306.6 306.1 1077.0 2 239.0 270.1 269.0 286.3 296.2 309.4 1077.0 3 264.0 246.3 277.9 288.9 293.9 303.6 1077.0 4 276.0 261.1 243.7 285.2 284.8 289.2 1077.0 5 309.0 288.1 271.8 264.3 292.7 293.6 1077.0 6 281.0 335.4 312.7 309.8 290.4 321.0 1077.0 7 261.0 294.0 348.8 334.9 323.0 303.3 1083.0 8 283.0 267.0 300.6 362.4 340.8 328.5 1083.0 9 300.0 315.1 301.2 344.5 403.4 379.6 1093.1 10 296.0 303.2 318.8 314.3 348.0 406.4 1104.0 11 285.0 286.7 294.6 317.2 304.9 336.9 1084.0 12 273.0 282.1 284.0 299.7 313.7 302.7 1072.2 9-12 1154.0 1187.1 1198.6 1275.7 1370.0 1425.6 4353.3 Attendance Area Weston Ranch HS Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 322.0 318.1 326.2 337.5 337.5 337.5 339.9 1 309.0 301.8 298.2 305.7 316.3 316.3 339.9 2 262.0 310.3 303.1 299.5 307.1 317.7 339.9 3 304.0 265.9 314.8 307.5 303.8 311.5 339.9 4 286.0 301.8 263.9 312.3 305.3 301.7 339.9 5 336.0 285.6 301.3 263.6 311.8 305.0 339.9 6 331.0 336.2 285.4 301.4 263.4 311.6 339.9 7 324.0 338.7 344.1 292.0 308.3 269.5 363.9 8 337.0 329.3 344.6 350.0 297.2 313.7 363.9 9 270.0 311.1 303.3 318.4 323.4 275.3 344.4 10 316.0 267.9 308.9 301.9 316.4 321.3 347.9 11 291.0 279.3 236.2 272.9 265.9 278.4 341.6 12 276.0 281.5 270.3 228.5 264.0 257.6 337.9 9-12 1153.0 1139.8 1118.7 1121.7 1169.7 1132.6 1371.8



High School Attendance Area Student Population Projection Trends The high school student population is also projected to see growth over the next 5 years. By 2021 the District can expect to see 7,894 students. This amounts to an increase of 377 students over the projection period. Unlike the District’s elementary schools, enough capacity exist to house the projected growth for the District’s high school population as a whole. However, analysis of the capacity of individual highs schools dose reveal that capacity may be a concerns for Manteca High School. The campus has a capacity of 1,703 students but currently (Fall 2016) reports a resident student population of 1,843 students. This number is expected to remain relatively flat over the next 5 years. The District has not been forced to address this is due to voluntary transferring that is occurring. The high school attendance matrix reveals that 455 students transfer out of Sierra high school. 214 of the these students attend East Union High School while another 221 are electing to attend Sierra High School. After conversing with district staff it was revealed that these students are choosing to transfer and are not being forced to attend a campus other than their resident school because of a lack of capacity. The effect has been dropping the enrollment of the to 1,421 students well below the site capacity of 1,843 students. Over the next 5 years Sierra High School is expected to the largest gain as it is projected to see 271 students added to its resident student population by 2021. Manteca High Schools attendance area is expected to add 74 students while Lathrop will add just 28 students during the same period. The District’s 2 remaining attendance areas will see losses of no more than 20 students over the span of the projection period. Much of the District growth at the High School level is expected to take place at some point beyond 2021 as the District approaches maturity when the District high school student population is expected to be nearly double what is currently. This will bring the need for the District to add capacity to each high school with the exception of Weston Ranch High School.

R o b er t sIs la n d

StocktonMetropolitan

Airport


E Louise Ave

E Roth Rd

S El Dorado St

Lathrop Rd

W Yosemite Ave

Arch Airport Rd

S Ma

in S

t

N Main St

S Au

stin

Rd

E Lathrop Rd

S Ai

rpor

t Way

S Airport Way Arch Rd

Cottage Ave

Yosemite Ave

E Mariposa Rd

S Union RdW Mathews Rd

E Yosemite Ave

W Louise Ave

E French Camp RdW Howard Rd

S Ma

ntec

a Rd

S Au

stin

Rd

E West Ripon Rd

French Camp Rd

KennedyKennedy


MantecaManteca

LathropLathrop

Manteca Community Day HS

New VisionEducation Ctr

Calla Alternative HS

beTECHAcademies

Manteca Unified School District2016-17 High School Attendance Boundaries

0 1 2 3 4Miles1 in = 1 miles

Map Created: 3/23/2017



KennedyKennedy


Del RioDel Rio

StocktonStockton

MantecaMantecaLathropLathrop

RiponRiponTracyTracy

SalidaSalida

EAST UNION HSLATHROP HS

MANTECA HSSIERRA HS

WESTON RANCH HS

East Union High SchoolCurrent: 1356.0

2019: 1259.42023: 1336.92026: 1211.1

Maturity: 3229.7

Weston Ranch HSCurrent: 1153.0

2019: 1121.72023: 1056.22026: 1058.6

Maturity: 1371.8

Lathrop HSCurrent: 1210.0

2019: 1177.12023: 1257.12026: 1408.4

Maturity: 2660.6

Sierra HSCurrent: 1154.0

2019: 1275.72023: 1408.52026: 1290.5

Maturity: 4353.3

Manteca HSCurrent: 1843.0

2019: 1844.12023: 1926.22026: 1933.1

Maturity: 2660.6

R o b er t sIs la n d



E CA-120

CA-4

Hamm

ett R

d

W 11th St

W River Rd

W Durham Ferry Rd

Jack Tone Rd

SJa

ckTo

neRd

E Mariposa Rd

Pirrone R d

S Ahern Rd

S Bi

rd R

d

W Lehman Rd

W Linne Rd

E Durham Fer ry Rd

W Grant Line Rd

E River Rd

CA-33

S Mu

rphy

Rd

Robe

rtsRd

French Camp Rd

W Howard Rd

E West Ripon RdKasson Rd

San JoaquinSan JoaquinRiv Nat'lRiv Nat'l

Wildlife RefWildlife Ref

ST99

ST99

ST33

ST120

RiponRipon

§̈¦5

§̈¦205

52

7173

7475

81

85 86879294 959596

100

106107

108

112113

116117121

130131133134135136139

141

158

170177

223224

235 243244

246

247

248249

250253

254256

260

267

268

295 299

318319 320322

323

325

331

353

370372

374

375

377

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

910

11

1213 16

17

1819

20

21

22

23

27

28 30

31 32 3738 39 40

4142

43

4445

4647

48

51

53

5455 56

57

5859

60

6163

64 65

6667 68

6976

78 79

80

82 8388 89 90

91 93 959798

99 101

104105 109110111

122123124125

128129132137140

142143

144

145

146

147

148

149150 153

154

155

156 160161

163

167

168

169

172

173174175

176 180181

182183184

185186

187

188

189190

191

192

193 194

197

198

199

200

201

204

205

206

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

219

220

221222

223225

226 227228

229

230231232233

236237238

241

242

252

258

262263265

266

269

270

271272

276

277

281282283

285286

287

288289

291 292 293294

296 297298

300

301

303304

306307

308

310313

317

321

324

326

327

328

329330

332333

334

335

336337338

339

340

341

342

343 344 345346 347 348

349350

351

352

354355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362 363

364

367

368

369376

378

379

380

381382

383

384 385

386

387

388389

Manteca Unified School District2016-17 Study Areas

1 in = 2 miles0 1 2 3 4

MilesMap Created: 3/23/2017

Study Areas

364

60

188

189

386

154

12

333

215

8

199

6

193

380

220

190

33516

17

359

194 216

389

192

327

310

44

301

9

7

197

342

388

10

40

11

47

378

350368

358

45

304

360

42

61

46

230

347

334

65

143

67

231

258

98

13

357

99

53

37

300

191

28

27

303

122

219

142

68

346

236

223

59

313

343

30

78

348

43

228 221

238

294

32

226

31

155

222345

298

344

225

38

291

15397

227

58

89

48

233

69

229

383

299

149

295

217

39

35479

63 76

66

235

349

51

297292

150

163

111

101

88

80

242

109

296

253

64

108

254 293

107

375

243

104

355

370

75

8790

91

110

95

356

41

52

232

94

22

379

260

73

374

241

387

56

246

224

83

252

116

105

249

237

93

141

81

100

353

121

74

85

112113

86

372

256

92

250

82

96

282

117

271

71

248

287 281283

ST120ST120

Yosemite Ave


247244

106

144 148

2

4

3

173

181

168

132

167

174

169

186

269

317

262

175 140

176

137

266

128

180

267

182

270 172

320

170

265

177

129

324

321 322

184

323

185

183

319

133134

139

135

318

325

130

268

131

263

136

201

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5

§̈¦5


38April 13, 2017 Appendix B - Page

Study Area Projections by Residence Study Area 1 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 24.8 1 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 24.8 2 1.0 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 24.8 3 2.0 1.0 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 24.8 4 0.0 1.8 0.8 2.4 2.1 2.1 24.8 5 3.0 0.0 1.5 0.7 2.0 1.8 24.8 6 0.0 3.3 0.0 1.6 0.8 2.2 24.8 7 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 1.7 0.8 24.8 8 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.4 24.8 9 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 24.9 10 3.0 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 25.1 11 1.0 2.8 0.9 2.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 12 2.0 1.0 2.8 0.9 1.9 0.0 24.4 K-8 14.0 14.6 16.6 18.3 17.5 19.4 223.2 9-12 7.0 6.9 5.8 2.9 5.0 3.0 99.1 K-12 21.0 21.5 22.4 21.2 22.5 22.4 322.3 Study Area 2 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 17.0 16.8 17.2 17.8 17.8 17.8 25.6 1 16.0 16.0 15.8 16.2 16.7 16.7 25.6 2 10.0 15.7 15.7 15.5 15.9 16.4 25.6 3 12.0 9.8 15.4 15.3 15.2 15.5 25.6 4 10.0 12.0 9.8 15.4 15.3 15.2 25.6 5 15.0 10.0 12.0 9.8 15.4 15.3 25.6 6 17.0 15.4 10.3 12.4 10.1 15.8 25.6 7 15.0 17.3 15.8 10.5 12.6 10.3 27.4 8 16.0 15.1 17.5 15.9 10.6 12.7 27.4 9 14.0 14.1 13.3 15.4 14.0 9.3 26.0 10 11.0 14.0 14.1 13.3 15.4 14.0 26.2 11 13.0 10.4 13.3 13.4 12.7 14.6 25.7 12 13.0 12.5 10.0 12.8 12.8 12.2 25.5 K-8 128.0 128.1 129.5 128.8 129.6 135.7 234.0 9-12 51.0 51.0 50.7 54.9 54.9 50.1 103.4 K-12 179.0 179.1 180.2 183.7 184.5 185.8 337.4 Study Area 3 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.7 1 10.0 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.9 5.7 2 2.0 10.1 4.7 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.7 3 6.0 2.1 10.4 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.7 4 3.0 5.8 2.0 10.0 4.6 4.6 5.7 5 4.0 2.9 5.6 1.9 9.8 4.6 5.7 6 6.0 3.9 2.9 5.5 1.9 9.6 5.7 7 4.0 6.0 3.9 2.9 5.5 1.9 6.1 8 5.0 4.2 6.2 4.1 3.0 5.8 6.1 9 2.0 4.9 4.1 6.2 4.0 3.0 5.8 10 8.0 1.9 4.8 4.0 5.9 3.9 5.8 11 7.0 6.9 1.7 4.1 3.4 5.1 5.7 12 4.0 6.7 6.6 1.6 3.9 3.3 5.7 K-8 45.0 44.6 45.4 43.7 44.5 46.4 52.1 9-12 21.0 20.4 17.2 15.9 17.2 15.3 23.0 K-12 66.0 65.0 62.6 59.6 61.7 61.7 75.1



Study Area 4 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 7.0 6.9 7.1 7.3 7.3 7.3 11.9 1 17.0 6.6 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.9 11.9 2 10.0 17.3 6.7 6.6 6.8 7.0 11.9 3 5.0 10.3 17.9 6.9 6.8 7.0 11.9 4 9.0 5.1 10.4 18.0 7.0 6.9 11.9 5 14.0 9.1 5.1 10.5 18.2 7.1 11.9 6 14.0 13.9 9.0 5.0 10.4 18.0 11.9 7 13.0 14.6 14.4 9.4 5.3 10.8 12.7 8 12.0 13.1 14.7 14.6 9.5 5.3 12.7 9 9.0 11.0 12.1 13.5 13.4 8.7 12.1 10 10.0 9.1 11.2 12.2 13.7 13.5 12.2 11 9.0 8.4 7.6 9.4 10.2 11.5 12.0 12 10.0 8.8 8.2 7.5 9.2 10.0 11.8 K-8 101.0 96.9 91.8 85.0 78.2 76.3 108.7 9-12 38.0 37.3 39.1 42.6 46.5 43.7 48.1 K-12 139.0 134.2 130.9 127.6 124.7 120.0 156.8 Study Area 5 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 8.0 7.9 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.4 6.1 1 6.0 7.7 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.0 6.1 2 9.0 6.5 8.4 8.3 8.5 8.8 6.1 3 3.0 9.4 6.8 8.7 8.6 8.8 6.1 4 7.0 3.1 9.5 6.9 8.9 8.8 6.1 5 6.0 7.7 3.4 10.5 7.6 9.8 6.1 6 11.0 6.2 7.9 3.5 10.8 7.9 6.1 7 6.0 10.9 6.1 7.9 3.4 10.7 5.4 8 10.0 6.2 11.3 6.4 8.2 3.6 5.4 9 8.0 10.6 6.6 12.0 6.7 8.7 6.6 10 7.0 8.6 11.3 7.1 12.8 7.2 6.6 11 5.0 6.4 7.9 10.4 6.5 11.8 6.5 12 7.0 4.9 6.2 7.6 10.1 6.3 6.4 K-8 66.0 65.6 69.1 68.4 72.4 74.8 53.5 9-12 27.0 30.5 32.0 37.1 36.1 34.0 26.1 K-12 93.0 96.1 101.1 105.5 108.5 108.8 79.6 Study Area 6 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 102.5 1 0.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 102.5 2 1.0 0.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.0 102.5 3 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 102.5 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.8 1.8 102.5 5 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.9 102.5 6 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 102.5 7 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 102.0 8 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 1.1 1.1 102.0 9 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 1.2 102.9 10 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 103.9 11 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.9 102.0 12 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 100.9 K-8 8.0 9.8 12.0 10.7 12.7 13.8 921.5 9-12 2.0 1.8 1.7 4.1 3.1 4.1 409.7 K-12 10.0 11.6 13.7 14.8 15.8 17.9 1331.2



Study Area 388 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 8 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 9 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 4.4 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 4.3 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 4.3 K-8 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.7 9-12 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 17.3 K-12 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 56.0 Study Area 389 Projection Date 10/5/2016 CURRENT PROJECTED RESIDENT STUDENTS 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MATURITY K 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 7 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 23.9 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 24.1 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 23.7 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.4 K-8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 214.2 9-12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 95.1 K-12 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 309.3


Agenda Item

Department: SO Type: Action Item

Item Number: 2



TITLE: Adoption of Resolution of 16/17 - 71, Statutory School Facilities Fees and Adoption of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption

Background/ Rationale: Consideration and possible adoption of Resolution to increase the Level 1 Developer Fees for Residential and Commercial Development. The School Mitigation Fee Justification Study, adoptions of findings thereon, increase in school facilities fees pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 as established by the State Allocation Board (SAB). Such fees become effective sixty (60) days after adoption of the Resolution. Consideration and adoption of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption.

Please refer the associated Public Hearing for the School Mitigation Fee Justification Study attachment.

Funding Source: -N/A

Presentation: ri No M Yes (attached) ri Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Recommendation: Administration recommends Board adoption.

Prepared By: Approved By: Superintendent's Office

2271 Wiest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA. 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Boar (121gentlas

April 2017 — School Mitigation Fee Justification Study

Manteca Unified School District April 18, 2017

11. corn mmee rcsronds and planr . grnndh wring a co.-qr.-hollow° %Inter io ensure all vont, art hnN—Facdiies. Deferred Mannenan.d. Budge. En rollmrnl. Aalling. and PnAramming—lo mm ah rvolrIng nmln of Al MUSD Audeo,

Meau3311 1••••••18re min, Dos Denspaph., doted 1.11-17 411.1135131#11.1.13a. ra 41,1nit

BwM ludori pen.. nb ll 3.1313elopfed 13-U

1 lark Berle, Raga Coacher, j.icqui Bratenbucher, Same Bowers, MLA Durrsy. Vulg.. !loom,

Top Growth

Concerns

The existing school facilities have limited additional capacity to house students generated

from approved and pending residential projects located in Manteca and Lathrop; specifically, anticipated new growth south of SR 120 and in Lathrop. • Davis Demographics to present a growth and build-out study that will advise the timing

and location of new school facilities. • Currently working with the development community and local agencies in an effort to

mitigate growth impact. • Ed. Spec Pmgram and Options to address growth. • Prioritization of state funding toward modernization vs. growth.

Top

Modernization

Projects

The Next Round of Modernization projects align with Funding available in 2018.

Th.,. Pfl,./..i. a., French Camp / George McParland / Nile Garden I New Haven / Neil flafley

Prior to proceeding with the next round of projects, we must: Identify proposed budget for each project I Develop scope for proposed projects / Align proposed scope with growth

Top Facilities

Conditions /

Needs

The needs identified within the Master Facilities Plan exceeds the deferred maintenance

annual budget of 1800,000, including:

Roofing Repairs / Asphalt Repairs / Flooring Replacement / Playground Replacements / HVAC Replacement / Athletic Fields and Facilities

The Deferred Maintenance budget is allocated across many different management codes which is formulated based on historic expenditures. There is not enough money to address all needs present.

Several Upcoming Projects include: Sierra HS Roofing Replacement / EUHS Roofing Replacement & Repairs / Summer Flooring Replacement - 20 classrooms I Summer Playground Replacement - IC & AK / Summer Asphalt Repairs - potentially 5 sites / Sierra aml EUHS Portable Demolition

Top Fiscal

Funding Issues

No steady income for growth / Lack of funds for new schools / Lack of sufficient funds for modernization / Lack of sufficient funds for deferred maintenance

Growth Steering Committee

Uptolethellfltgaperleslmellorlle 3119.1 preakillsealowthlainq BeAo Poore° Keenalacalon

MIS MAMMA Id I rlti9.11 allln u,,,,,11364NEcemege. holm Apr.A Owen 9-1,

Clan. rommunny Smu Leaderslop worn Groxit ',arm* Dermot* IN Spit I and,houAll AnennVwrAtei Inor and gook bdtarqr'Strm.r1,331.11 .,*

2017 171;1.3

I 1.31,30p on

I

ad All

=1 63 m133 D D j 131 330 tat 4.113skew q (weave pn33.3 ortnAn Inaornoi lording RA

Mol•pdame 3.1,1011 AN ILO la gm. peo,Is I 11-I1

o C33

2017 Sury•y ends 1-31-2017 Steering Committee time Ines and goals Exchange"Summary Input Report reviewed

MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Growth Steering Committee Timeline

Update Level I Developer fees in an effort to

Capacity studies begin

MHS Roundtables 2-7-Land 219-17 Online CoTmunitly "Thought Exchange" begins

Programmatic Descriptions (Ed. Spec.) and "Thought

provide additional growth funding Begin Project Identification and

Approval Process 9-12-2017

Growth Community Senior Leadership reviews Growth

Facilities Planning

Supervisor hired

Measure M

closed 1-13-17

Growth Steering Committee provides

board update 3-7-2017

Growth committee reviews Davis Demographic Board Budget/ LCAP presented 6-6-17

Growth Study presented to board 4-18-2017

and adopted 6-13-17

CB0 provides Financing / Funding Plan /

CFDs / G.O. for growth projects 8-22-17

Growth Steering Committee Members: Jason Messer, Dr. Clark Burke, Roger Goatcher, Jacqui Breitenhucher, Aaron Bowers, Erika Durrer, Victoria Brunn, and Heather Armstrong.

Page 2

Summary of Developer Fees

• School District Must JUSTIFY Fee Amount

• State Sets MAXIMUM Fee Amount (adjusted by State in even years)

• Typically the LOWEST Fee Amount

Level I

Fee

• School District Must JUSTIFY Fee Amount

• Fee Amount Based on STATE Parameters Level II • Typically the HIGHEST Fee Amount

Fee )0--

• School District Must QUALIFY for Level II Fee • Level III Fee Amount is DOUBLE the Level II Fee

• STATE Determines When Level III Applies

Level Ill

Fee

Page 3

+ March 29, 2017 — Developer Outreach

Meeting

+ March 30, 3017 — Notice Provided to

Interested Parties

+ April 8, 2017 — Notice of Public Hearing

Published

+ April 18, 2017— Board Meeting

Timeline for Approval and Imposition of Updated Level I Fee

Updated Level I School Fees

Development Type Current Updated

Fee Fee Change

$3.36 $3.48 $0.12 Residential Development

Commercial/ Industrial Development

Office $0.54 $0.56 $0.02

Retail $0.54 $0.56 $0.02

Industrial $0.54 $0.56 $0.02

Warehouse $0.54 $0.56 $0.02

Self Storage $0.26 $0.26

Age-Restricted Senior Housing $0.29 $0.29 + Public Hearing

+ Approval of School Mitigation Fee Justification Study

+ June 18,2017 — New Level I Developer Fee Goes into Effect

Page 4

tate

Ma

t

Shortfall

School Fees

=111

1Z1

4FTI

MN

FT14

7

Sufficiency of Developer Fees

•:* In CONCEPT, 50% of new development impact is

funded from DEVELOPER FEES and 50% is

funded by STATE GRANTS.

•:* In PRACTICE, most school districts experience a

25% to 40% funding SHORTFALL due to:

÷ Higher ACTUAL facilities costs than the State

generated LOWER budget limits; and

÷ Inadequate STATE generated cost ESCALATION

methodology.

+ In REALITY, Manteca Unified School District is

experiencing a 38% funding SHORTFALL.

Page 5

Level I Fee Justification — Projected Unhoused Students

❖ Based on information received from local

planning agencies there will be over 14,000

residential units developed within the

boundaries of the District.

❖ These residential units will generate almost

8,700 students.

❖ The District can house approximately 1,400 of

these students in existing and funded but not

constructed facilities.

❖ The School Mitigation Fee Justification Study

identifies the costs to provide housing for the

remaining 7,258 unhoused students.

Description

Projected Units

Grades

K-6

Single Family

Grades

9-12

Grades Elementary

7-8 Total

12,969

Projected Students 4020 1184 5204 2491


Funded Capacity

Unhoused Students

339

3767

0 339

781 I

4548

98

1747

Description

Projected Units

Multi-Family

Grades

K-6

1,491

Grades Elementary Grades

7-8 Total 9-12

Projected Students 573 155 728 235

Available Capacity 0 0 0 0

Funded Capacity

Unhoused Students

0

573

0 0

155 I 728 I

0

235

Description

Projected Units

Total

Grades Grades Elementary Grades

K-6 7-8 Total 9-12

14,460

Projected Students 4,593 1,339 5,932 2,726


Funded Capacity

Unhoused Students

339

4,340

0

936

339

5,276

98

1,982

Page 6

Level I Fee Justification — Net Cost of Facilities

+ The District estimates that the cost to

provide facilities for unhoused students

will exceed $397 Million.

+ The District currently owns a number of

proposed school sites. The value of these

sites is estimated to be $24.225 Million.

+ The District estimates that they can

apply for State Grant funding for

approximately $126 Million. [1]

+ After accounting for owned school sites

and State Grants funding the Net Cost of

Facilities is approximately $246.5 Million.

[1] Subject to availability of funds and potential changes in the

State program.

Description Grades

K-8

Grades

9-12 Total

School Facilities Costs

School Facilities Capacity 1,000 1,500

7,258 Unhoused Students 5,276 1,982

School Facilities Required 5.28 1.32

Per Student School Facilite Tc-+: :-:;47,725 $73,30r

School Facilities Costs for Unhoused Students $251,797,100 $145,292,492 $397,089,592

Credit for Current School Sites Owned

Acres of Land Owned 46.90 50.00

Cost per Acre $250,000 $250,000

Credit for Owned Sites $11,725,000 $12,500,000 $24,225,000

State Grants

Unhoused Student Grants $60,668,988 $29,801,496

Site Acquisitions Grants $10,257,233 $2,811,667

Site Development Grants $15,331,848 $7,471,902

Total State Grants $86,258,069 $40,085,065 $126,343,134

Net Costs of Facilities $246,521,458

Page 7

Comparison of Cost of Facilities and Level I Fees

$9.00

sac°

$7.00

$6.00

tarn

54m

$3D0

$2.00

SIDO

SOD°

8.18 $

$3.48

• Net Cost of Facilities (Per Scd Ftd •State Mandated Maximum Level I If,. (Per sn It f

Net Cost of Facilities

Description Amount

Total Facilities Cost $372,864,592

Less: State Grants $126,343,134

Net Cost of Facilities $246,521,458

Total Development (Sq. Ft.) 30,142,250

Net Cost of Facilities (Per Sq. Ft.) $8.18

III lot al State Grant,: O Pr oi(xied I eve' I Devekper Fees • I ies Slxxtfall

Level I Fee Justification — Net Cost of Facilities & Identified Shortfall

Facilities Shortfall

Description Amount

Net Cost of Facilities $372,864,592

State Mandated Maximum Level I Fee (Per Sq. Ft.) $3.48

Total Development (Sq. Ft.) 30,142,250

Less: Projected Level I Developer Fees $104,895,030

Less: State Grants $126,343,134

Facilities Shortfall $141,626,428

Identification of Facilities Shortfall

Page 8



RESOLUTION NO. 16/17 - 71

STATUTORY SCHOOL FACILITIES FEES AND ADOPTION OF CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

WHEREAS, Education Code Section 17620 authorizes school districts to levy a fee, charge or dedication

against any new construction within its boundaries for the purpose of funding the construction or

reconstruction of school facilities; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 65995, Subdivision (b)(3), the fees

authorized by Education Code Section 17620 have presently been established by the State Allocation Board

("SAB") in the amount of $3.48 per square foot for residential development and $0.56 per square foot for

commercial/industrial development; and

WHEREAS, the governing board ("Board") of the Manteca Unified School District

("District") has caused a study to be prepared by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (E PS) entitled School

Mitigation Development School Fee Justification Study (incorporated herein by reference and hereinafter

referred to as the "Study"), which identifies the purpose and use for the fee and sets forth a reasonable

relationship between the fee to be imposed, the type of development project on which the fee is to be

imposed, and the increased school facilities made necessary by virtue of the burden imposed by the

development; and

WHEREAS, Education Code Section 17621 specifically exempts the adoption, increase, or imposition

of any fee, charge, dedication or other requirement pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 from the

provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")(Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et

seq.); and

WHEREAS, upon a determination that the imposition of school facilities fees under

Education Code Section 17620 is exempt from CEQA, the District is entitled to file a Notice of

Exemption with the County Clerk pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15062.

NOW, TH1h.REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

1. The Board makes the following findings: Prior to the adoption of this resolution

("Resolution"), the Board of the District conducted a public hearing at which oral and/or written

presentations were made as part of the Board's regularly scheduled April 18, 2017 meeting. Notice of the

time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered has been

published in the Manteca Bulletin, and Stockton Record for a period of ten days, in accordance with

Government Code Sections 66017 and 66018. At least 10 days prior to the meeting, the District made all

relevant information available to the public indicating the cost, or estimated cost, of the construction or

reconstruction of school facilities made necessary by the residential and/or commercial/industrial

development to which the fee shall apply. Additionally, at least 21 days prior to the public hearing the

District sent courtesy letters to the local Development Community and hosted a meeting on March 29,

2017 to take comment and respond to questions on the Study.

2. The purpose of the fees is to provide adequate school facilities for the students of the District

who will be generated by residential and commercial/industrial development in the District.

3. The fees are to be used to finance the construction and reconstruction of school facilities

4. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the imposition of the fee and

the types of development projects upon which the fees shall be imposed for the purpose of the

construction or reconstruction of school facilities in that residential, commercial and industrial

development will generate students who will attend District schools. These students cannot be

housed by the District without additional school facilities or the reconstruction of existing school

facilities. The fees will be used to fund all or a portion of new school facilities or to reconstruct existing

school facilities.

5. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the

additional or reconstructed school facilities attributable to the development upon which the fee shall

be imposed in that the square footage of these developments has a direct relationship to the number

of students that will be generated, and thus to the facilities the District must add and/or reconstruct in

order to accommodate the additional students.

6. The District maintains a separate capital facilities account or fund as required by

Government Code Section 66006.

7. There are no other adequate sources of funds to meet the District's school facilities

needs occasioned by, and resulting from, the construction of new residential and/or

commercial/industrial development within the District.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board incorporates herein by reference, approves

and adopts the Study entitled Residential/Commercial Development School Fee Justification Study,

dated March 2017, prepared by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) which documents the need for

the school facilities fees.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Developer fee is applicable to the entire are within

the Manteca Unified School District jurisdiction as illustrated on the District Boundary Map attached

hereto as Exhibit "A."

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that since the Study justifies fees at the allowable limits, the

District hereby increases fees on residential development to $3.48 per square foot, and fees on

commercial/industrial developments to $0.56 per square foot, in accordance with Education Code Sections 17620,

et seq., and Government Code Sections 65995, et seq.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the increase in fees shall take effect sixty (60) days after the date

of this Resolution.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Superintendent of the District, or his or her designee, shall

give notice of the Board's action herein to all cities and counties with jurisdiction over the territory of the District

in accordance with the requirements of Education Code Section 17620 and 17621, requesting that no building

permits (or, for manufactured homes and mobile homes, certificates of occupancy) be issued on or after the

date which is sixty (60) days after the date of this Resolution, without certification from the District that the fee

specified herein have been paid. Said notice shall specify that collection of the fees is not subject to the restriction

set forth in Government Code Section 66007, Subdivision (a) but, pursuant to subdivision (b) of that statute, the

fees are to be collected prior to issuance of building permits.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that developers of commercial or industrial development be provided

the opportunity for a healing to appeal the imposition of the fee on their developments.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that nothing contained or expressed in this Resolution shall be

construed to affect the District's authority to increase fees, enter into agreements with developers, or otherwise

adopt or impose, to the extent permitted by law, additional fees, to fully mitigate the impact of residential and/or

commercial/industrial development upon the District's school facilities.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, in the event that the Board takes action in the future to

adopt an alternative fee pursuant to Government Code Section 56995.5 or 65995.7, commonly known as

("Level 2" or "Level 3") fees, respectively, in an amount greater than that authorized by this Resolution,

this Resolution shall be held in abeyance during the time in which the greater (Level 2 or Level 3) fee is

authorized. If, for any reason, any future Board action to adopt a greater (Level 2 or Level 3) fee ceases to

be effective this Resolution shall then immediately return into effect unless otherwise specified by the Board.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the District's administration is authorized to make

expenditures and to incur obligations of the fees for the purposes authorized by law.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby finds that the adoption of increase in fees

hereunder is statutorily exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Education Code Section 17621.

AND BE F1' FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board hereby approves the CEQA Notice of

Exemption regarding the increase in fees and directs the Superintendent, or his or her designee, to file the

CEQA Notice of Exemption, together with a certified copy of this Resolution, with the County Clerk of

each County in which the District shall collect fees pursuant to Education Code Section 17621.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board hereby adopts this Resolution and directs

the Superintendent, or his or her designee, to file a certified copy of this Resolution, together with all relevant

supporting documentation, the map clearly indicating the boundaries of the area subject to the fee, and

attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and to each city and each county in which the District is situated, pursuant to

Education Code Section 17621.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Education of the Manteca Unified School District this

eighteenth day of April, 2017, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

STEPHEN J. SCHLUER, PRESIDENT EVELYN MOORE, CLERK Board of Education Board of Education

Coun

Jack To

ne R

d

-a Cr

o•-•

120'

U

S M

urp

hy R

d

BANTA EMENTARY SD

Exhibit "A" — Manteca Unified School District Boundary Map t:. -

41avy Dr V% 34

J W 8th S

4 °;) o ow e Bost ' S TO C KTON 0 5 ,p

0- ,e, UNIFIED SD .--.....\

0 (1...)

490ri'eo, 0 4,0,

Arch Rd

ESCALON UNIFIED Howard Rd

120

Ja

ck Ton

e R

d

M!ANTECA UNIFIED SD

E Roth Rd

Fr e /ic1/ 2 Ca

)?0, TRACY UNIFIED SD Lathrop Rd

tr

0

Manteca

E Louise Ave

L

it Line Rd ( cr)

S

~RIP`Q,N UNIFIED SD 99 E River Rd

7.4 C

NNE Milgeo Ave

cr) W Main W Ripon Rd

SALIDA UNION ELEMENTARWE

Vi nne Rd ids

-P,

NEW JERUSALEM ELEMENTARY SD

E 0

•cs

HART-RANSOM UNION ELEMENTARY SD

1.5 r 3

Scidt in Miles

33

T

-a Bacon Rd

z

Superintendent's Office: Facilities Planning Manteca Unified School District

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: Office of Planning and Research

P.O. Box 3044, Room 113

Sacramento, CA 95812-3044

San Joaquin County Clerk

44 N. San Joaquin St.

Stockton, CA 95202

FROM: Manteca Unified School District

P.O. Box 32

Manteca, CA 95336

Project Title: Fee Justification Study to Increase Developer Fees

Project Applicant: Manteca Unified School District

Project Location - City: Various (the City of Manteca, and portions of the City of Stockton, City of

Lathrop and San Joaquin County) that fall within the boundaries of the Manteca

Unified School District

Project Location - County: San Joaquin County

Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: Increase of a fee against construction

within the boundaries of the district for funding construction and reconstruction

of school facilities, pursuant to Education Code Section 17620.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Manteca Unified School District

Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:


Exempt Status (check one):

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);

7 Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));

Categorical Exemption. State type and section number.

Statutory Exemptions. State code number: Education Code Section 17621.

Reason why project is Exempt: Increase to developer fees for purpose of school facility construction are

statutorily exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Education Code Section 17621.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Erika Durrer, Facilities Planning Supervisor Phone: (209) 858-0865

Facilities Planning Supervisor

ignature Date Title

- ]Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant

If filed by applicant: 1) Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2) Has a Notice of Exemption

been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes I l No

P.O. Box 32 Manteca, CA 95336 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337

Phone (209) 858-0700 Fax (209) 858-7570

www.naantecausd_net

Board of Education Meeting Board Agenda Item

Department SO/B Type Action

Item Number 3

DATE April 18, 2017 DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Office

TITLE: Consider, Discuss and Give Direction Regarding Elementary Counseling

Background/Rationale This item was tabled from the March 7, 2017 Board meeting.

Based on suggestions from the Board, a small group of district and elementary administrators formed a committee regarding enhancing counseling services at the elementary level. The group presented their report at the December 6, 2016, board meeting. At the request of a Board member, this item is on the agenda for Board discussion.

Funding: N/A

Recommendation: N/A

Presentation o No O Yes (Attached) o Yes. Presented at the Board Meeting


/7 /

77/

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board /1y,enclas


Agenda Item

Department: SO Type: Action

Item Number: 4


TITLE: Report: Joe Contreras Student Board Report

Background/Rationale: At the Board meeting, Student Board Member Joe Contreras will provide the report on the activities and events occurring at the comprehensive high schools.

To read each high school's student representative report, please be sure to view the weekly Highlights on the Outreach page at www.mantecausd.net/outreach/board-highlights.

Funding Source: N/A

Recommendation: N/A

Presentation: n No [1] Yes (attached) Z Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.


2271 Vest Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board Agoida.i.


Agenda Item

Department: OS/HR Type: Action

Item Number: 5


DEPARTMENT: Operational Services

TITLE: Consider Adoption of Resolution 16/17-75, Accepting Final Completion of RFP #P1516-010 Contract for the Boardroom AV System Replacement Project, CompView

Background/ Rationale: The Boardroom AV System Replacement project was contracted by RFP #P1516-010 Agreement with CompView. Ronald Mariano, MUSD Technology Support Supervisor has approved the completion of the Boardroom AV System Replacement project.

A final accounting of the RFP #P1516-010 Agreement with CompView is presented below:

Original Contract

$80,696.09

FINAL COST

$80,696.09

Funding Source: General Fund

Recommendation: Staff Recommends your approval.

Presentation: Z No n Yes (attached) ri Yes. Presented at the Board meeting.

Prepared By:

Approved By: Information Technology Department Clark Burke, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent

2271 West Louise Ave., Manteca, CA 95337 • 209.825.3200 • Board /1,gcwrld.i-

ACTION ITEM:



RESOLUTION NO. 16/17-75

ACCEPTING FINAL COMPLETION OF CONTRACT FOR THE BOARDROOM AV SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

COMP VIEW

WHEREAS, on the 14m day of February, 2017, a Purchase Order was executed by and between the Manteca Unified School District of the County of San Joaquin, State of California, as Owner, and CompView, Inc., of Pleasanton, California, 94588 as Contractor, for the Boardroom AV System Replacement Project in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, that the work contracted for as herein mentioned is declared to have been completed and is hereby accepted by the Manteca Unified School District of the County of San Joaquin, as Owner, and that the balance due under the agreement is to be paid to the Contractor according to its terms.

That Jason Messer is hereby authorized and directed to execute and cause to be recorded a Notice of Completion on behalf of the Owner.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 2017, by the following vote of the Board of Education of the Manteca Unified School District of the County of San Joaquin, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

STEPHEN J SCHLUER, PRESIDENT Board of Education Manteca Unified School District San Joaquin County, California

EVELYN MOORE, CLERK Board of Education Manteca Unified School District San Joaquin County, California

Res. No. 16/17-75 Action Item:

ACTION ITEM:

NOTICE OF FINAL COMPLETION

BOARDROOM AV SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Manteca Unified School District of the County of San Joaquin, State of California, as Owner of the property hereinafter described entered into An Agreement between itself, as Owner, and CompView, Inc. of Pleasanton, California, as Contractor, for the completion of the Boardroom AV System Replacement Project, in accordance with plans and specifications thereof.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the work under the terms of said agreement was completed to the satisfaction of the owner on February 14th, 2017, and by Resolution of Acceptance of Completion passed and adopted by the Board of Education on April 18th, 2017.

The name and address of lessee is Manteca Unified School District, Post Office Box 32, 2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337, and the nature of the interest of such owner is a fee simple title.

The address where the work was performed is located at 2271 W Louise Ave, Manteca, California 95337.

The name of the original contractor is CompView, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, 94588.

MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BY: Jason Messer Superintendent

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me , 20 , by , proved to

me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.

Signature of Notary Public (Seal)

Itcs. No. 16/17-75 :Action turn:

on this

day of

AGENDA MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Regular ...

Documents

Transcript of AGENDA MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Regular ...