6: BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of 6: BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK
6: BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK
6.1.INTRODUCTION:
“Health should mean a lot
more than
escape from death or, for
that matter,
escape from desease”.
(K.Park)1
Cancer is the group of more than 200 diseases characterized
by uncontrolled and unregulated growth of cells. It is the major
health problem that occurs in people of all ethnicities.
Although, cancer is often considered a disease of aging, with the
majority of cases diagnosed (76%) in those over the age of 55
years, it occurs in people of all ages. Globally cancers accounts
for 5.1% of total disease burden and 12.5% of all deaths.1
Many management options for cancer exist including:
chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, immunotherapy,
monoclonal antibody therapy and other methods which are used
depending upon the location and grade of the tumour and the stage
of the disease, as well as the general state of a person's
health.2
Chemotherapy is a kind of treatment that uses drugs to
attack cancer cells. It is called a "systemic treatment" since
the drug, entering through the blood stream, travels throughout
the body and kills cancer cells at their sites. The drugs may
rarely be intended to have a local effect, but in most cases, the
intention is to destroy cancer cells wherever they may exist in
the body. Since chemotherapy also affects normal actively
dividing cells such as those in the bone marrow, the
gastrointestinal tract, the reproductive system and in the hair
follicles, most patients experience some degree of side effects
like nausea, vomiting, hair loss, mouth sores, ulcers.3
Chemotherapy is now a mainstay of cancer therapy used in the
treatment of most of solid tumours and hematologic malignancies
like leukaemia’s, lymphomas, myeloma and myelodysplastic
syndromes.1
One of the primary responsibilities of the nurse in the
delivery of chemotherapy is to ensure that the correct dose of
the appropriate drug is given to the appropriate individual.
Despite the fact that safeguards are in place, serious medication
errors do occur. Such tragic events are regrettable but not so
remarkable when one considers the number of chemotherapy doses
given and the number of patients treated. The overall medication
error rate is estimated to be 2-10%. However, one recent survey
revealed that 63% of the respondents reported that errors had
occurred at their workplace. In addition only 3% of the errors
were reported to drug manufacturers or national databases though
most were reported internally. 4
Safe handling of chemotherapeutic agents during
administration and disposal is critical. Most antineoplastic
agents are toxic compounds that are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or
teratogenic. Direct contact may cause irritation of the skin,
eyes, and mucous membranes. Perioperative personnel should know
how to handle hazardous materials safely to protect the patient,
other staff members, and themselves. These safety precautions
include appropriately identifying the patient; correctly
preparing, verifying, and documenting the chemotherapeutic agents
being administered; consistently wearing personal protective
equipment; transporting the chemotherapeutic agent in a puncture-
resistant container labelled “chemotherapy”; properly disposing
of the chemotherapeutic agent and supplies; and handling a spill
if one occurs.5
Educational programmes about cancer and safe handling of
cancer chemotherapeutic drugs provide the nurses to safeguard
themselves as well as patients. Dissemination and current
information permits the nurses in general practice and other
specialities to learn about recent advances in cancer research
and ongoing clinical trials. It also includes providing education
or information about staging, current treatment regimen, clinical
indication for use, guidelines of administration, and
manifestation of toxicity, appropriate intervention. In
addition , the health care professional much be familiar with the
medication, mode of action, side effects an appropriate
administration and disposal procedure.2
Cancer, is the multidisease phenomenon and the word
cancer came from the ‘Father of Medicine’, Hippocrates, a
Greek physican. Hippocrates used the Greek words, Carcinos
and carcinoma to describe tumors, thus killing cancer
‘Karkinos’. In Greek the words refer to ‘carb’2. It is also
found in the animal kingdom is most of the multi cellular
animals like mammals, fish, reptiles and amphibians.3
According to American Cancer Society (ACS), Cancer is a
group of disease characterized by uncontrolled growth and
spread of abnormal cells. If the spread is not controlled,
it can result in death.4
Cancer theraphy has progressed rapidly in the last half
of the 20th century. Many cancers once considred incurable
are now controlled with the discovery of different methods
like surgery, radiation, and chemotherpy.5 Consequently the
attitude towards cancer has become a more positive one bright
with hopes of recovery.2
The era of cancer therapy began in the 1940 with the
first use of nitrogen mustards and folic acid antagonist
drugs6. At the turn of century Paul Ehrlich, who coined the
term chemotherapy and was named the “Father of Chemotherapy”.
The modern era of chemotherapy was initiated by the discovery
of the effective use of estrogen in prostate and breast
cancer.7
Chemotherapy is the use of chemical agents to kill
cells. In conversational usage, the term chemotherapy
refers to the chemical treatment of cancer. Most people
associate chemotherapy with a myriad of horrible side
effects, such as hair loss and nausea. While these side
effects do often accompany chemo regimens, millions of
cancer patients have been able to enjoy long, vibrant
lives because of this treatment option. Furthermore,
chemotherapy side-effect management has progressed
significantly over the past few decades. Many of
chemo’s distressing side effects can be prevented
completely, or controlled using today’s advanced
treatment strategies1.
More than 50% of people diagnosed with cancer are
treated with chemotherapy. For some patients, chemo
serves as their only treatment, whereas other patients
are prescribed chemotherapeutic drugs alongside other
treatment options. In the 1940s, the United States
Department of Defense recruited two pharmacologists,
Louis S. Goodman and Alfred Gilman, to research the
therapeutic properties of chemical warfare agents.
Autopsy findings involving people exposed to nitrogen
mustard (mustard gas) unveiled conditions in the body
conducive to tumor suppression1.
After World War II, the scientific community
embarked on a number of cancer treatment research
projects. These projects included the groundbreaking
use of folate analogues to treat Indian children with
leukemia in 1948. Folate anologues antagonize folic
acid in cells. Folic acid is a vital component of
cellular metabolism. When cellular metabolism is
impaired, cellular division is disrupted, or the cell
dies. Using folate analogues was the first
demonstration of remission in all patients that were
given the chemical agent2.
In the 1950’s, the U.S. government began
incentivizing pharmaceutical companies to develop
anticancer drugs. Since this initial “push” to support
cancer research and drug development, cancer has been
receiving an enormous amount of political and social
attention around the world. This much-needed attention
has led to many breakthrough tests and treatment
options2.
Chemotherapeutic agents are widely used in cancer
therapy because they can inhibit growth by disrupting
cell division and killing actively growing cells. With
increasing understanding of cell biology over the last
four decades, administration of antineoplastic agents
has become one of the most important modalities of
treating cancer2.
Chemotherapeutic drugs are grouped into alkylating
agents, nitrosoureas, antimetabolites, topiosomerase
inhibitors, antitumour antibodies, mitotic spindle
poisons, hormonal agents and miscellaneous drugs that
are not readily classifiable. Chemotherapeutic drugs
inhibit the process of mitosis, or cell division. Since
malignant (cancer) cells divide without control or
order, these drugs effectively target cancerous
growths. Some chemo drugs cause cancer cells to die
altogether by stimulating a process known as apoptosis
(programmed cell-death)3.
Although chemotherapeutic drugs are designed to
target fast-dividing cancer cells, they inadvertently
damage healthy cells. The faster a healthy cell
divides, the more likely it is to be affected by chemo.
This is why your hair may fall out during a chemo
regimen. The cells that compose the hair follicles
divide quickly3.
A study was conducted to indicate the increase in
the potential risk due to occupational exposure to
chemotherapeutic drugs. Nurses and pharmacists are the
main groups exposed to these drugs in the ambulatory
and hospital setting. The pharmacists are exposed to
these drugs while preparing them and the nurses while
administering them4.
6.1: NEED FOR STUDY Cancer is an abnormal cell growth and chemotherapy is a drug
regimen designed to stop that growth. Chemotherapy can also harm
healthy cells, according to the National Institutes of Health
(NIH), and cause side effects in cancer patients. Healthy cells
often recover and side effects gradually disappear in many cases.
Chemotherapy is administered intravenously, orally or
intrathecally. Without taking proper precautions, nurses and
other health industry workers can be exposed to the drugs.6
Cancer is the second most killing disease in the world
which affect man. Stewart (2003) stated that the global burden
of cancer continues to increase, Nearly 5.3 million and 4.7
million women developed malignant tumor and 6.2 million died from
the disease the number of new case is expected to grow by 50%
over the next 20 years to reach, 15 million by2020. 8
According to Global Cancer factsheet, an estimated 12.7
million new cancer cases occurred and 7.6 million deaths (around
13% of all deaths) in 2008. Lung, female breast, colorectal and
stomach cancers accounted for 40% of all cases diagnosed
worldwide. In men, lung cancer was the most common cancer (16.5%
of all new cases in men). Breast cancer was by far the most
common cancer diagnosed in women (23% of all new cases in
women).7
According to Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology:
Kidwai Institute of Oncology, among males cancer of the stomach
is the most predominant site of cancer constituting 9% of the
total cancers among males followed by cancers of the lung (7.0%),
oesophagus (6.6%), prostate (5.3%) and Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
(4.6%). Among females, cancer of the breast is the predominant
site of cancer and has accounted for 24.6% of the total cancers
in females followed by cancer of the cervix (15.9%), ovary
(4.9%), oesophagus (4.7%) and mouth cancers (4.6%). Altogether,
the first ten leading sites of cancers among males and females
accounted for 53.1% of the total cancers in males and about 70.9%
of the total cancers in females.8
A number of studies documented adverse health effects that
are connected with occupational exposure to antineoplastic
chemotherapeutic agents. The most frequent acute toxicities noted
include nausea, vomiting, headaches, dizziness, hair loss, and
liver damage. These acute symptoms were positively correlated
with the number of doses handled and the use of protective
equipment. Additionally, body mass was significantly associated
with the development of acute symptoms. Hepatocellular damage was
noted in nurses employed on an oncology unit. This symptom was
associated with the employee’s duration of work exposure and the
volume of handling.9
The main role of nurses in the field of oncology is
chemotherapy administration which is sensitive domain in oncology
nursing where little negligence or mistake may lead to adverse
consequences for patients, staff and environment. Literature
reveals that, medication errors in chemotherapy are a common
(44%) incidence due to lack of specific knowledge and training of
the staff in chemotherapy, prescription, preparation and
administration. This lacking of knowledge and training of the
staff leads to fatal incidences such as over dose of
chemotherapy, wrong calculations of drugs, wrong route of
transfusion which sometimes result in patient’s death. 10
A study on chemotherapy standard order form: preventing
errors was carried out to describe the development and
implementation of one approach to standardize and document
chemotherapy orders for patients in the acute-care settings. To
avoid errors in ordering, dispensing, and administering
chemotherapy that may have the potential for serious adverse
patient outcomes, a standardized order sheet was developed to
consistently document information regarding chemotherapy ordering
and administration throughout the hospital. Each component of the
form is essential in promoting safety and efficiency in the
chemotherapy ordering and administration process. A standardized
approach dramatically improved ordering, dispensing, and
administering chemotherapy. Multidisciplinary verification and
documentation of dose and schedule helps reduce chemotherapy-
related errors.11
While handling chemotherapy drugs and other potent or
hazardous drugs for their patients, nurses must be extremely
careful not to ingest them in any quantity. The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has released
an alert outlining the risks of handling chemotherapy drugs for
nurses and millions of other health workers. People who handle
chemotherapy drugs at any point from manufacture to patient
dosing and administration are at risk. In a public alert, NIOSH
estimates more than five million workers could be exposed through
various activities. Nurses and other workers are exposed through
prolonged contact with vial exteriors, counting out doses,
crushing tablets, priming intravenous sets and handling
contaminated clothing or waste, among other practices. Handling
chemotherapy drugs can lead to relatively mild symptoms, like
skin rashes. In other cases, adverse reproductive events and
cancer have been linked to exposure.5
The intravenous applications that have been used widely can
lead to some complications such as extravasation, ecchymosis,
hematoma and phlebitis. The extravasation is one of these
complications. Extravasation leads to some undesirable happenings
such as prolonged times of hospitalization of the patients,
unnecessary diagnostic procedures and even unnecessary
treatments, stress effects on the relatives of patients, extra
workload for health staff and the economic loss as well as to
threatening the lives of patients. It is important for the health
professionals, who are responsible for managing of intravenous
applications, to know the drugs that cause tissue injury and take
the necessary measures to prevent extravasation. Therefore, this
article defines the pathogenesis of extravasation, types,
symptoms, and evidence-based management.12
Cancer nursing requires a clinical knowledge of the
disease and its treatment as well as the skills to care for and
support clients and their families.5
Over the last decade concerns about the hazards of handling
chemotherapeutic agents increased as various studies were
published. Analysis of these data suggest possible carcinogenic,
teratogenic and mutagenic risk for health professionals
(predominantly nurses and pharmacists) that handle these drugs.9
Some studies have shown an increased in the number of
people receiving chemotherapy. Current treatment regimens that
include hazardous drugs are more complicated than those employed
in the past. Many regimens include high-dose therapies and use
of multiple drug combinations. While these newer therapies have
significantly improved cancer survival rates, preparing more
drugs and use higher doses of drugs will likely increase workers
exposure to these hazardous drugs.10
An intimate knowledge of the pharmacology and side effects of
each agent, as well as their interactions with one another, is
essential for their use.11 Rapid advancement of medical science
leading to specialization and expectation of improved quality of
hospital care, places an increase in the demand for nursing
services. Due to the changing nature of health care system,
nursing is also undergoing dynamic alteration.12
Most studies demonstrated occupational exposure to hazardous
drugs can occur when safe handling measures fail or when they are
not properly used. Exposure may occur during drug preparation,
transport or administration during the disposal process when
handling patient excreta, and in the event of spills.13
Chemotherapy drugs represent a significant health risk to
healthcare personnel. Such drugs have been found to be
carcinogenic, to cause chromosomal damage and may also cause
damage and may also cause damage to normal skin and necrosis of
compromised skin. The most common exposures are the result
inadvertent ingestion a drug on food, inhalation of drug dusts or
droplets or direct skin contact. Proper training and the use of
personal protective equipments are critical to ensure the safety
of health care workers who handle chemotherapy drugs.14
A study was conducted on “Risk of handling injectable
neoplastic agents” in America. Health care personals, described
physical complaints like skin, mucus membrane and eye irritation,
light headness, facial flushing, hair loss, nausea experienced
following the preparation of antineoplastic drugs.15
Some studies demonstrated that chemotherapy drugs attack
reproducing cells, they cannot differentiate between normal
tissues that are replacing worn-out cells and targeted cancer
cells. The normal cells will be damaged by chemotherapy along
with cancer cells which results in side effects.16
The investigator had exposure to many staff nurses, after
the administration of the cancer chemotherapeutic drugs who were
manifested with skin rashes, itching, dyspnoca etc. The unsafe
handling of the of the drugs is the major cause for these
complaints.The above studies suggest that if appropriate
training, utilization of effective equipment and supplies, and
strict compliance with detailed policies and procedures provides
the best approach to reducing the potential health risks of
occupational exposure to hazardous drugs. Keeping in veiw the
above fact, the investigator planned to conduct the planned
teaching programme on student nurses after assessing their
knowledge on the safe handling of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs
and its side effects. The investiogator also found that this
study will help the student infuture to do the practice in
healthcare effectively and improve their knowledge on the safe
handling of chemotherapeutic drugs.
Cancer nursing requires a clinical knowledge of the disease and
its treatment as well as the skills to care for and support
clients and their families.5
Over the last decade concerns about the hazards of handling
chemotherapeutic agents increased as various studies were
published. Analysis of these data suggest possible carcinogenic,
teratogenic and mutagenic risk for health professionals
(predominantly nurses and pharmacists) that handle these drugs.9
Some studies have shown an increased in the number of
people receiving chemotherapy. Current treatment regimens that
include hazardous drugs are more complicated than those employed
in the past. Many regimens include high-dose therapies and use
of multiple drug combinations. While these newer therapies have
significantly improved cancer survival rates, preparing more
drugs and use higher doses of drugs will likely increase workers
exposure to these hazardous drugs.10
An intimate knowledge of the pharmacology and side effects of
each agent, as well as their interactions with one another, is
essential for their use.11 Rapid advancement of medical science
leading to specialization and expectation of improved quality of
hospital care, places an increase in the demand for nursing
services. Due to the changing nature of health care system,
nursing is also undergoing dynamic alteration.12
Most studies demonstrated occupational exposure to hazardous
drugs can occur when safe handling measures fail or when they are
not properly used. Exposure may occur during drug preparation,
transport or administration during the disposal process when
handling patient excreta, and in the event of spills.13
Chemotherapy drugs represent a significant health risk to
healthcare personnel. Such drugs have been found to be
carcinogenic, to cause chromosomal damage and may also cause
damage and may also cause damage to normal skin and necrosis of
compromised skin. The most common exposures are the result
inadvertent ingestion a drug on food, inhalation of drug dusts or
droplets or direct skin contact. Proper training and the use of
personal protective equipments are critical to ensure the safety
of health care workers who handle chemotherapy drugs.14
A study was conducted on “Risk of handling injectable
neoplastic agents” in America. Health care personals, described
physical complaints like skin, mucus membrane and eye irritation,
light headness, facial flushing, hair loss, nausea experienced
following the preparation of antineoplastic drugs.15
Some studies demonstrated that chemotherapy drugs attack
reproducing cells, they cannot differentiate between normal
tissues that are replacing worn-out cells and targeted cancer
cells. The normal cells will be damaged by chemotherapy along
with cancer cells which results in side effects.16
The investigator had exposure to many staff nurses, after
the administration of the cancer chemotherapeutic drugs who were
manifested with skin rashes, itching, dyspnoca etc. The unsafe
handling of the of the drugs is the major cause for these
complaints.The above studies suggest that if appropriate
training, utilization of effective equipment and supplies, and
strict compliance with detailed policies and procedures provides
the best approach to reducing the potential health risks of
occupational exposure to hazardous drugs. Keeping in veiw the
above fact, the investigator planned to conduct the planned
teaching programme on student nurses after assessing their
knowledge on the safe handling of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs
and its side effects. The investiogator also found that this
study will help the student infuture to do the practice in
healthcare effectively and improve their knowledge on the safe
handling of chemotherapeutic drugs.
6.2: REVIEW OF LITERATUREReview of literature is defined as board comprehensive in
depth systematic and critical review of scholarly
publications in particular topic . The purpose of review of
related literature was to gain an insight in to various
aspects of the problem under study such as design, methods,
instruments, measures and techniques of data collection that
may prove useful in the proposed project.
The literature review is divided into four sections
Section A – literature review on handling of
chemotherapeutic drugs and its side effects
Section B- literature review on knowledge on safe handling
of chemotherapeutic drugs among nurses
Section C- literature review on skill on safe handling of
chemotherapeutic drugs among nurses
SECTION A: LITERATURE REVIEW ON HANDLING OF
CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGS AND ITS EFFECTS A descriptive study on Prevention and Management of
Extravasation of Cytotoxic Drugs revealed that extravasation of
certain cytotoxic agents during peripheral intravenous
administration may cause severe local injuries. Most
extravasation can be prevented with the systematic implementation
of careful administration techniques. However, the management of
this complication, the aim of which is to prevent progression to
tissue necrosis and ulceration, remains an important challenge in
the care of cancer patients. Empirical guidelines recommend the
use of topical Dimethylsulfoxide and cooling after extravasation
of Anthracyclines or Mitomycin, locally injected Hyaluronidase
after extravasation of Vinca alkaloids, and locally injected
sodium thiosulfate (sodium hyposulfite) after extravasation of
Chlormethine (mechlorethamine; mustine). Plastic surgery may be
necessary when conservative treatment fails to prevent
ulceration. The possibility of late local reactions must also be
considered in the management of patients receiving
chemotherapy.17
A case report on Extravasation: a dreaded complication of
chemotherapy shows that extravasation is a severe complication of
chemotherapy. It is defined either as the escape of a
chemotherapeutic agent from a vessel into the surrounding tissues
by leakage or as an involuntary injection of a drug into the
tissues. The frequency of extravasation in adults is considered
to be between 0.1% and 6%.The severity of tissue injury is
dependent on the type and concentration of the chemotherapeutic
agent and the quantity injected. Prevention of extravasation can
be done by adequate guidelines of chemotherapy administration and
training of nurses is of the utmost importance. 18
The cross sectional survey on Patients' perspectives and
safe handling of oral anticancer drugs at an Asian cancer centre
was conducted, the interviewer-administered survey was undertaken
at the outpatient pharmacy. Eligible patients had received at
least one cycle of oral anticancer agent treatment or had been
taking oral anticancer agents continuously for 3 months. The
majority of the patients (94.2%) reported no difficulties in
adherence to their oral anticancer treatment regimens. Forty per
cent of patients reported habitually washing their hands after
administering their anticancer drugs. None of the patients,
except two patients receiving Capecitabine, indicated that they
habitually used gloves to handle their oral anticancer
medications. However, this survey demonstrated the need to
improve patients' understanding of the requirements for storage,
handling and safe administration of oral anticancer drugs. As the
nurses are responsible for providing education , the nurses
should be educated first in order to improve patients’ safe
handling of drugs.19
An analytical cross sectional study on Health Hazards among
Oncology Nurses Exposed to Chemotherapy Drugs consists of a study
group and a control group of nurses. The study group included 35
oncology nurses who were involved in direct patient care and were
exposed to chemotherapeutic drugs during their preparation and
administration. The control group consists of 29 nurses who were
involved in direct patient care without being exposed to
chemotherapeutic drugs. It was found that health hazards among
the study group and controls were: abortions (31.4% vs 10.3%),
infertility & sub-fertility (14.3% vs 3.4% ), premature labour
(14.3% vs 17.2%), soft tissue injuries due to spills & splashes
(14.3% vs 0.0%), and developmental and behavioural abnormalities
among the children of the nurses (8.6% vs 3.4%). Urine samples
from study nurses were more mutagenic than controls (40% vs
10.3%). Risky behaviour among study nurses included: eating food
in drug handling areas (45.7%), use of improper place for
preparing and handling cytotoxic drugs, expelling air from
syringes filled with drugs, needle stick injuries, unsafe
handling of contaminated material and unsafe cleaning of spills.
Only 22.9% of the study nurses attended a training program about
occupational health and safety and 8.6% of them mentioned that
there are nursing care guidelines for procedures for dealing with
patients receiving cytotoxic drugs as well as presence of in-
service training programs. There was poor use of protective
equipment in the study group.20
A study on Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes
of nurses and physicians handling antineoplastic drugs shows that
the frequencies of structural chromosome aberrations of persons
occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs without adequate
protection were measured in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 106
persons from five oncological units and in an adequate control
population. The observed chromosomal aberration frequencies were
3.3 ± 0.1 aberrations per 100 cells in the exposed group and 0.6
± 0.1 aberrations per 100 cells in the controls. Chromosomal
aberration frequencies were not correlated with age, duration of
exposure and smoking habits. The results stress the necessity to
protect hospital staff against the potential risk related to the
handling of antineoplastic drugs. 21
A study on Leukemia and reproductive outcome among nurses
handling antineoplastic drugs consists the study group, female
nurses who potentially had been exposed to antineoplastic drugs
through their work and internal control group of about double the
number of potentially exposed nurses were nurses employed in the
same period in other departments in the same hospitals. It shows
that the crude odd ratio miscarriages among those handling
antineoplastic drugs during pregnancy compared with the control
group was 0.76 (95% Confidence interval 0.38-1.43). The analysis
by exposure level showed a significantly increased risk among
those in the low exposure category. The crude odd ratio for
malformations among those handling antineoplastic drugs during
pregnancy compared with the control group was 1.02 (95%
Confidence Interval 0.47-2.06). Inclusion of all nurses employed
in oncology departments, whether exposed or not, changed the Odd
Ratio to 1.00 (95% Confidence Interval 0.52-1.85).
Standardization according to the age of the mother changed the
risk estimate from 1.02 to 0.99 only. There were no clusters of
specific malformations. The mean birth weight among children live
born to mothers handling Antineoplastic drugs during pregnancy
was 3397 g compared with 3455 g in the control group. The Odd
Ratio for low birth weight according to this definition among
those exposed to Antineoplastic Drugs was 1.06 (95% Confidence
Interval 0. 42-2 .67). The number of observed cancer cases (14)
was close to the expected (11.69) corresponding to an Risk Ratio
of 1.20. The only significantly increased site was lymphatic and
haematopoietic tissue where the increased risk was due to two
cases of leukaemia, giving an Risk Ratio for leukaemia of 10.65
(95% C confidence Interval 1.29-38.5).22
A one year prospective study on Cancer chemotherapeutic
error in hospitalized patients: Attributable damages and extra
costs was conducted in hospital detecting medication errors at
every step of the anticancer chemotherapy use process. A costs
analysis was performed by simulation of potential hospital stays
and valued at the complete hospital cost of the corresponding
diagnosis related groups. Prescription errors represented 91% of
errors followed by pharmaceutical errors (8%) and administration
errors (1%). A statistically significant relationship was found
between the rate of medication errors and month of the year (p =
0.001). May and January were the months most at risk of errors,
while October and November were the least. In total, 13.4% of
avoided errors would have caused a temporary injury, 2.6% a
permanent damage and 2.6% would have compromised the vital
prognosis of the patient (including 4 to 8 potential deaths). If
not avoided, 216 additional hospital days would have been
necessary. Thirteen medication errors reached the patient without
damages except two patients, needing reinforced monitoring. This
study demonstrates that major medication errors take place in
hospital but that a dedicated control quality system allowed
capturing most of them before they reach the patient. Potential
consequences for patients and cost of medication errors justify
the development of preventive actions. Thus, one of the
preventive aspects is preventing administration errors which can
be done by educating the nurses through various educational
programs.23
A study on Preventing Vincristine Sulfate Medication Errors
showed that describe three types of medication errors associated
with its use, and suggest strategies for vincristine sulfate
medication error prevention. Medication errors involving
vincristine sulfate include over dosage (wrong dose), name
confusion (wrong drug), and incorrect administration (wrong
route).Vincristine medication errors are preventable errors that
usually result in serious patient harm and often are lethal.
Nurses need to be aware of the types of medication errors that
can occur with chemotherapy agents and be familiar with clinical
signs and symptoms associated with these errors. Education should
be provided to nurses for proper handling of drugs so that they
can promote patient safety by implementing specific strategies to
prevent vincristine medication errors.24
The above studies show that improper handling of
chemotherapeutic drugs causes harmful effects to both patients
and the nurses who handle them. Extravasation, necrosis ,
ulceration are the challenges infront of health personnel to be
prevented in order to reduce the complications and extra burden
to economy. The nurses are at risk for side effects such as
infertility, preterm labour, leukemia as well as chromosomal
changes. Health care professionals including nurses should be
aware of medicine errors and specific strategies to be developed
to prevent it.
SECTION B: LITERATURE REVIEW RELATED TO KNOWLEGDE ON
SAFE HANDLING OF CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGS AMONG NURSES A study on Knowledge, Attitude and Safe Behaviour of Nurses
Handling Cytotoxic Anticancer Drugs suggests that the level of
knowledge of the nurses concerning antineoplastics was not
satisfactory. Findings for nurses’ safety behaviour and usage of
recommended health safety measures showed that, notwithstanding
the rules and regulations pertaining to chemotherapeutic drugs,
nurses did not comply with them fully. In service training is a
very effective tool to increase the level of knowledge. This
study also revealed the necessity for improvement of the
working environment and the availability of appropriate
protective equipment.25
A survey on knowledge assessment and information needs of
oncology nurses regarding in patient medication was conducted to
determine how nurses master medications prescribed to their
patients and problems nurses may have with prescribed drugs and
identify possible support tools. About ninety four percentages of
dosage were familiar to participants. The problems nurses having
related to medications were, in order of frequency, difficulties
with notions of therapeutic equivalents and generic drugs (89%),
storage condition (81%) and dilution, reconstruction and
administration methods (79%). However, side effects,
contraindications, and drug-drug interactions were not adequately
identified. Nurses reported facing problems mainly related to
drug administration, drug storage, and generic drugs and their
therapeutic equivalence. Nurses need to be made aware regarding
handling of drugs by providing education and multiple tools are
in development to help nurses in these areas. 26
A study on The influence of nurses knowledge,
attitudes and health beliefs on their safe behaviour
with cytotoxic drugs was conducted. Sixty‐one nurses
participated in the study, 31 hospital‐based nurses
daily exposed to cytotoxic drugs for the last 5 years.
A gap was found between the nurses' knowledge and their
actual behaviour concerning the potential risks of
cytotoxic drugs and their use of protective measures
(p< .005). Significant correlations were found among
the components of the extensive Health Belief Model
(perceived susceptibility, barriers, benefits and self‐
efficacy). The study's findings support the need to
promote primary prevention by providing a safe
environment for the employee by means of education,
training with regard to safety measures, clear policy,
written guidelines and their enforcement. 27
A single group pre-test post- test study on
Assessment of knowledge, skill and attitude of oncologynurses in chemotherapy administration in tertiary hospital shows
that The information regarding participants’ working experience
shows that the majority 18 (51%) had more than 10 years of
working experience as a general nurse, while 16 (46%) had less
than 5 years of work experience as a chemo nurse, indicating that
the majority of the study participants 19 (54%) had less work
experience as chemo nurse. Results of the study showed that all
participants were female, majority (80%) were undergraduates and
have less working experience as chemo nurse, and only one third
(30%) were oncology trained, the mean scores of knowledge were
calculated by Cochran’s Q test. The knowledge scores have
significantly increased with ‘educational training’ (p value <
0.001) and the results of the study illustrate value of the
participants attitude was 58.2, which was higher than the other
two components (knowledge and skills). The difference in the
attitude of the nurses was not found to be statistically
significant in repeated measure of ANOVA. 10
The above studies revealed that knowledge of nurse regarding
handling of chemotherapeutic drugs is less and knowledge is to be
improved by conducting inservice education, other educational
programmes written guidelines and making clear policies.
SECTION C: LITERATURE REVIEW RELATED TO SKILL ON SAFE
HANDLING OF CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGS AMONG NURSESA cross sectional study on The handling of anticancer drugs
shows that only seven (58%) of the 12 hospitals investigated, had
a written policy for handling such hazardous chemicals. Staff
nurses were involved in preparation of cytotoxic drugs in three
(25%) hospitals, while domestic staff were involved in cleaning
up spillage in five (42%) hospitals. Administration of these
drugs was mainly carried out by nursing (42%) or both staff. The
site of preparation was considered unsuitable in five hospitals
(42%), due to either lack of essential equipment such as vertical
laminar flow cabinet (33%) or use of the site for preparing other
drugs gloves were used during preparation in all of these
hospitals, while eye spectacles and surgical face masks were used
in six (50%) hospitals, and gowns or aprons were used in 9 (75%).
Special trays or absorbent sheets for preparation were used in
75%, while a special pad to break open ampoules was used in 50%
of investigated hospitals. A vertical laminar flow cabinet was
used in 67%, and Luer lock syringe fittings in 75%. Only in one
hospital was air expelled from syringes into a special pad. The
study revealed serious inadequacies in equipment and expertise in
handling cytotoxic agents in some of the investigated hospitals.
These range from absence of written policies to lack of essential
facilities and proper training and practice. Although some effort
has been made to promote the standard of safety handling of
cytotoxic drugs.28
A descriptive study on Cytotoxic drug spillages among
nursing personnel working in the chemotherapy administration
areas was conducted to determine the patterns of the cytotoxic
drug spillages & the exposure of the nurses to these spillages.
An observational assessment was carried out in the Chemotherapy
administration areas (Radiotherapy Ward, Radiotherapy and Medical
Day Care Rooms)at a tertiary care hospital. During one month
observation, 77.3% of the nurses experienced small spills (< 5ml
or 5 gms). The common site of the spillage for more than half
(52.9%) of the subjects was surface of preparation of the drug
and 47% experienced spillage over both surface of preparation and
the gloves worn by them. The prevalence of spill per person in
all the three research settings was 1.3, 2 and 3.6 respectively
for Radiotherapy Ward, Radiotherapy and Medical Day Care
Chemotherapy rooms. The mean (no. of spillages) ± S.D = 2.53 ±
1.74. The comparison of difference in terms of spills occurrence
in three research settings using Kruskal Walli's test. A
significant difference was observed in occurrence of spills among
three research settings with Kruskal Walli's P value of
0.008.When three Research settings were evaluated for significant
difference among themselves using post hoc analysis, it was found
that subjects in Medical Day Care experienced significantly
higher spills than the subjects working in Radiotherapy Ward and
Radiotherapy Day Care with P value of 0.006 and 0.051. Results
suggest that drug spills are common in chemotherapy
administration areas. Guidelines to manage the cytotoxic drug
spills to be displayed in the unit and a "chemotherapy spill kit"
to manage cytotoxic spills should be made available in all the
chemotherapy administration areas. 29
The above studies show that the skill of nurses handling
cytotoxic drugs is inadequate spills in the administration site
should b properly handled by proper guidelines and making
available chemotherapy spill kit.