46528-002: Jalalpur Irrigation Project - Asian Development Bank

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP)

Project number: 46528–002 January 2020

PAK: Jalalpur Irrigation Project Prepared by the Irrigation Department, Government of the Punjab for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

JALALPUR IRRIGATION PROJECT

Updated Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP)

for ICB-P3 ( RD 225+500 to RD 379+750) (PART-1)

June, 2019

NATIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PAKISTAN (PVT) LIMITED NESPAK House, 1-C, Block-N, Model Town Extension, Lahore-54700, Pakistan

PABX: 92 42 99090000 Fax: 92 42 99231940 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nespak.com.pk

Sub-Consultants

INTEGRATED CONSULTING SERVICES (PVT) LIMITED766-G/4 JOHAR TOWN, LAHORE

Technical Resource Services (PVT) LIMITED13- L Model Town Extension, Lahore PAKISTAN

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.nespak.com.pk/

JIP-ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3 - RD 225+500 to RD 379+750

NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS i

DETAILED DESIGN OF JALALPUR IRRIGATION PROJECT (JIP)

LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN (LARP)

June, 2019 Issue/ Revision

Date Originator

Reviewer Description

Updated LARP ICB-P3

June, 2019

Rana Abdur Rehman (Social Safeguards Specialist)

Rafaquat Ali (PM)

Final LARP ICB-P3

This LARP has been prepared of Main Canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750 covering 10distributaries and 8 Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs) for ICB-P3, the titled Project and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of PDA Consultants hired for the purpose. The PDA Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify PDA Consultants for all loss or damage resulting therefore. The PDA Consultants accept no further responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned.


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS ii

IMPORTANT FOR REVIEWER/READER Due to huge data of Annexure-II (Land Record Data), the LARP is devided into two Parts: Part-1 Comprises main text Chapters 1 to 9, Appendix and all Annexures except Annexure-II Part-2 Annexure-II, it comprises all data of land to be acquired along with DPs and compensation of

land, crop and trees etc.


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS iii

PART-1


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS iv

ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design of Jalalpur Irrigation Project

LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

LIST OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i

LIST OF ANNEXURES .......................................................................................................................... iii

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... iv

LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. v

ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ viii

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS ..................................................................................................................... ix

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. ES-1

1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 DESIGN LEVEL DETAILS .................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 ROW AND MEASURES TO MINIMIZE RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ............................... 1-3 1.4 OBJECTIVE OF THE LARP ............................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 RESETTLEMENT PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 1-4

2. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ....................................................... 2-1

2.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Collection and Review of Secondary Data/Information .................................................. 2-2 2.1.2 Pre-Test of Questionnaires ............................................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Collection of Primary Data .............................................................................................. 2-2

2.2 PROJECT IMPACTS ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1 Impact on Private Land .................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.2 Project Impact on Government Land.............................................................................. 2-6 2.2.3 Impact on Private Residential structures, Cattlesheds and Fixtures .............................. 2-6 2.2.4 DPs‟ Assessment of Relocation ..................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.5 Impact on Crops ............................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.6 Impacts on Private Owned Non-Fruit Trees ................................................................... 2-7 2.2.7 Impacts on Fruit Trees .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2.8 Impacts on Government Trees ...................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.9 Impact on Public Structures ........................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.10 Impact on Community Structures ............................................................................... 2-9

2.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DPS‟ HOUSEHOLDS ...................... 2-9 2.3.1 Household Composition and Working Household Members ......................................... 2-9 2.3.2 Education and Literacy Level of Household Members ................................................... 2-9

2.4 OCCUPATION, INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF THE SAMPLE RESPONDENTS ... 2-10 2.4.1 Income of the Respondents ......................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.2 Expenditures of Respondents ...................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.3 Land Holding Status of Respondents ........................................................................... 2-13 2.4.4 Vulnerable DPs............................................................................................................. 2-13 2.4.5 Indigenous People ........................................................................................................ 2-14 2.4.6 Available Social Amenities in the Project Area ............................................................ 2-14 2.4.7 Housing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 2-15

2.5 GENDER SURVEY ........................................................................................................... 2-15 2.5.1 Women‟s Role in Socio-economic Activities ................................................................ 2-17


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS v

2.6 CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISM IN THE PROJECT AREA ............................... 2-18 2.7 ASSET VALUATION ......................................................................................................... 2-18

2.7.1 Valuation of Land ......................................................................................................... 2-18 2.7.2 Valuation of Structures ................................................................................................. 2-18 2.7.3 Valuation of Crops ........................................................................................................ 2-19 2.7.4 Valuation of Private Trees ........................................................................................... 2-19 2.7.5 Valuation of Fruit Trees ............................................................................................... 2-20 2.7.6 Valuation of Govt. Owned Trees ................................................................................. 2-20

3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK, POLICY AND ENTITLEMENTS .......................................................... 3-1

3.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 NATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS .................................................................................. 3-1

3.2.1 Constitution of the Republic of Pakistan (1973) ............................................................. 3-1 3.2.2 Land Acquisition Act (1894) ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.3 Pakistan‟s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement ...................... 3-1 3.2.4 ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy ADB‟s Safeguard Policy Statement.................... 3-2 3.2.5 Comparison of Pakistan‟s Land Acquisition Act 1894, and ADB SPS-2009 and Measures to Address the Gap. ....................................................................................... 3-4

3.3 ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENTS .................................................................................. 3-6 3.3.1 Eligibility .......................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.2 Entitlements .................................................................................................................... 3-7

4. CONSULTATIONS, PARTICIPATION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .............. 4-1

4.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................... 4-1

4.3.1 Primary Stakeholders ..................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3.2 Secondary Stakeholders ................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3.3 Key Persons ................................................................................................................... 4-2

4.4 CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................... 4-2 4.4.1 Consultation with Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 4-3 4.4.2 Individual Consultation ................................................................................................. 4-10 4.4.3 Community Priority Needs ............................................................................................ 4-11 4.4.4 General Opinion of Consulted Communities ................................................................ 4-11 4.4.5 Consultations with Relevant Departments ................................................................... 4-11

4.5 GENDER SURVEY AND Consultation ............................................................................. 4-12 4.5.1 Findings of the Gender Survey..................................................................................... 4-13 4.5.2 Actions Taken as a Result of the Consultations ........................................................... 4-17

4.6 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................... 4-21

5. COMPENSATION, RELOCATION AND INCOME RESTORATION ......................................... 5-1

5.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 COMPENSATION FOR AFFECTED LAND ....................................................................... 5-1

5.2.1 Compensation of Private Land ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Compensationof Government Land ............................................................................... 5-1

5.3 COMPENSATION FOR PRIVATELY OWNED STRUCTURES ........................................ 5-1 5.4 COMPENSATION OF COMMUNITY OWNED STRUCTURES ......................................... 5-2 5.5 COMPENSATION OF Public FIXTURES ........................................................................... 5-2 5.6 COMPENSATION OF PRIVATE NON-FRUIT AND FRUIT TREES .................................. 5-2 5.7 COMPENSATION OF GOVT. TREES ............................................................................... 5-2 5.8 COMPENSATION OF CROPS ........................................................................................... 5-3 5.9 RELOCATION OPTIONS ................................................................................................... 5-3

5.9.1 Residential Structures .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.9.2 Additional Assistance for Vulnerable and Severely Affected DPs ................................. 5-3 5.9.3 Income Restoration ........................................................................................................ 5-4

5.10 COMPENSATION FOR DPS WITH LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPEDIMENTS ..... 5-5


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS vi

6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ......................................................................................... 6-1

6.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 PID/PMO(CANALS) ............................................................................................................ 6-1

6.2.1 Social and Environment Unit (SEU) ............................................................................... 6-2 6.2.2 Deputy Director (Social) ................................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.3 Deputy Director – Community Relations ........................................................................ 6-3

6.3 EXTERNAL MONITORING CONSULTANT (EMC) ........................................................... 6-3 6.4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (GRC) .................................................................. 6-4 6.5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR .................................................................................................... 6-4 6.6 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANTS (PIC) .................................................... 6-4 6.7 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART............................................................................................... 6-4

7. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING ......................................................................... 7-1

8. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF LARP .............................................................................. 8-1

8.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ....................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 PROCESS OF LARP IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................... 8-1 8.3 DISCLOSURE OF LARP AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ....................................... 8-2

9. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................................................ 9-1

9.1 INTERNAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION ................................................................. 9-1 9.2 EXTERNAL MONITORING & EVALUATION ..................................................................... 9-1

9.2.1 Scope of work ................................................................................................................. 9-1 9.2.2 Reporting Requirement .................................................................................................. 9-2

LIST OF ANNEXURES Annexure-I: Compensation Details of Private Owned Structures of ICB-P3 Annexure-II: List of Land to be Acquired and Affected DPs Annexure-III: Construction Rates Approved by Buildings Department, Jhelum Annexure-IV: Compensation Cost of Private Non-Fruit Trees under Project Impact of ICB-P3 Annexure-V: Compensation Cost of Government Trees under Project Impact of ICB-P3 Annexure-VI: Compensation of Public Structures (WAPDA Electricity Poles) Annexure-VII: List of Eligible Vulnerable DPs for Additional Assistance Annexure-VIII: Compensation to Severely Affected DPs Annexure-IX: Photographs of 02 Residential Structures under Project Impact Annexure-X: Photographs of Meetings and Field Visits of Project Officials and Local Authorities Annexure-XI: Six Steps for Preparation of DPs Lists by the JIP Revenue Patwaries Annexure-XII: Photographs of Consultations at Various Locations of Canal, Distys and FCCs Annexure-XIII: Photographs of Gender Survey and Consultations (2017-2019) Annexure-XIV: Focus Group Discussions Annexure-XV: Community Consultations Annexure-XVI: Verified Scanned Copies of Vulnerable DPs Annexure-XVII: Local Market Rates for Installation of Private Owned Tube Well Annexure-XVIII: Local Market Rates of Water Pipes for Irrigation Annexure-XIX: Notification of Rate of Govt. Trees, FW&F, Govt. of the Punjab Annexure-XX: Land Price Notification of DPAC, Jhelum and Khushab Districts Annexure-XXI: Agri. Commodity Rates of Local Market, Pind Daden Khan


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS vii

LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: List of Proposed Structures of JIP- ICB-P3 ...................................................................... 1-2

Table 1.2: Distribution of Mouza amongst Main Canal, Distys and FCCsof P-3 ............................... 1-3

Table 2.1: Summary of Impacts and Categories of DPs of P3 .......................................................... 2-4

Table 2.2: Land to be Acquired for JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 ........................................................................ 2-5

Table 2.3: Category of Impacted Land and DPs of ICB-P3 ............................................................... 2-5

Table 2.4: Private Affected Structures Located in the RoW under Project Impacts .......................... 2-6

Table 2.5: Assessment of Relocation of DPs of ICB-P3 ................................................................... 2-6

Table 2.6: Cropped Area and Crop Yields of ICB-P3 ........................................................................ 2-7

Table 2.7: Trees to be Uprooted from ROW under Project Impacts of ICB-P3................................. 2-8 Table 2.8 Govt. Land, Trees and Fixtures under Project Impacts of ICB-03 ………………………2-11 Table 2.9: Percentage of Working Household Members of DPs ....................................................... 2-9

Table 2.10: Literacy Rate and Education Level of Members of DPs‟ Households ............................ 2-10 Table 2.11: Occupationsof Respondent DPs …………………………………………………………...2-

101

Table 2.12: Monthly Income Range of the Respondents of P3 ......................................................... 2-12

Table 2.13: Expenditures of Respondents ........................................................................................ 2-12

Table 2.14: Land Holding Status of Respondents ............................................................................. 2-13

Table 2.15: Access to Social Amenities in the Project Area .............................................................. 2-14

Table 2.16: Housing Conditions of Respondents .............................................................................. 2-15

Table 2.17: Location Wise Number of Participants of Gender Consultations ................................... 2-16

Table 2.18: Women‟s Role in Socio-economic Activities .................................................................. 2-17

Table 2.19: Unit Rates for Valuation of Structures of P3 ................................................................... 2-19

Table 3.1: Salient Features of Pakistan‟s LAA 1894 ......................................................................... 3-1

Table 3.2: Difference between Pakistan‟s Law, ADB Policy and Measures to Address the Differences or Gaps ..................................................................................... 3-4

Table 3.3: Entitlement Matrix for Compensation ............................................................................... 3-7

Table 4.1: Consultations/ Focus Group Discussions with the Participants of P3 .............................. 4-3

Table 4.2: Consultation Meetings with Participants of ICB-P3 .......................................................... 4-4

Table 4.3: Individual Consultation with the DPs of P3 ..................................................................... 4-11

Table 4.4: Consultation/Meetinge with the Departments for ICB-P3 ............................................... 4-12

Table 4.5: Locations and Number of Participants of Gender Consultations ................................... 4-12

Table 4.6: Gender Consultation and Focus Group Discussion of ICB-P3 ...................................... 4-17

Table 4.7: Steps in the Grievance Resolution Process ................................................................... 4-22

Table 5.1: Construction Rates of Various Type of Construction ....................................................... 5-1

Table 6.1: Roles and Responsibilities in LARP Implementation ....................................................... 6-1

Table 7.1: Detailed Resettlement Budget of ICB-P3 ......................................................................... 7-1

Table 8.1: Updated LARP Implementation Schedule of ICB-P3 ....................................................... 8-1

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Map Showing Channels Route and Resettlement Hotspots Sheet 1/3 …. ..1-5 Figure 6.1: Organizational Chart .......................................................................................................... 6-5


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS viii

ABBREVIATIONS AC Assistant Commissioner

ADB Asian Development Bank

AHH Affected Household

AP Affected Person

BoR Board of Revenue

CAP Corrective Action Plan

CCA Culturable Command Areea

CAS Compulsory Acquisition Surcharge

CoI Corridor of Impact

CBO Community Based Organization

DC Deputy Commissioner

DCR District Census Report

DD Deputy Director

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

DP Displaced Person

DPAC District Price Assessment Committee

EA Executing Agency

EM Entitlement Matrix

EMC External Monitoring Consultant

FCC Flood Carrier Channel

FGD Focus Group Discussions

GPS Global Positioning System

GRC Grievance Redress Committee

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

ICB International Contract Bidding

IMR Internal Monitoring Report

IP Indigenous People

LAA Land Acquisition Act

LAC Land Acquisition Collector

LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement

LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

M&E Monitoring & Evaluation

NGO Non-Government Organization

NRSP National Rural Support Program

OPL Official Poverty Line

PIC Project Implementation Consultant

PD Project Director

PDA Project Design Advance

PID Punjab Irrigation Department

PMO (Canals) Project Management Office for Canals

RD Reduced Distance

RF Resettlement Framework

RP Resettlement Plan

RoW Right of Way

SEU Social & Environment Unit

SPS Social Policy Statement


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS ix

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS The following terms and definitions have been used in this Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP).

Affected Household: All members of a household residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit and are adversely affected by the Project, or any of its components. It may consist of a single nuclear family or an extended family group. CoI (Corridor of Impact): CoI is working area falling within RoW or outside the RoW. It is generally used to restrict to carry out any civil/development activity. Compensation: Payment in cash or in kind of the replacement cost of the acquired/lost assets. Cut-off-date: The date that establishes DPs‟ eligibility to receive compensation for affected assets and rehabilitation assistance. Any person who enters in the area after the announced cut-off date or any asset established in corridor of impact after cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. Displaced Person (DP): Displaced persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of involuntary acquisition of land for the Project. Entitlement: Range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation allowance, which are due to DPs, depending on the nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base. Income Restoration: Includes re-establishing income sources and livelihood of the DPs according to their status. Involuntary Resettlement: Any physical or economic displacement where the DPs have no right to refuse the land acquisition by the state that result in their displacement. This occurs when land is acquired through (i) expropriation by invoking the eminent domain power of the state, or (ii) land is acquired through negotiated settlement when the pricing is negotiated in a process where expropriation will be the consequence of a failure in the negotiation. Indigenous People: Refers to “ethnic minorities”, “cultural minorities”, “tribes”, “natives”, “indigenous cultural minorities”, and “aboriginals” whose social or cultural beliefs and practices are distinct from the mainstream society and are, therefore, at greater risk of being disadvantaged in the development process. Land Acquisition: The process whereby a person is compelled by a government agency to acquire all or part of the land, a person owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of the government agency for public purpose in return for compensation. Market Value: The value of an asset determined by market transaction of similar assets and finally arrived at after negotiations with the owners. It includes transaction costs and without the depreciation and deductions for salvaged building material. Marginally Affected: Land or structure is affected less than 10 percent and the remaining portion is still viable for use.


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS x

Participation: A process that allows other stakeholders to influence and share control over development initiatives, decisions and the use of resources that affect them. Relocation: The physical relocation of a DP from her/his pre-Project place of residence or business. Replacement Cost: The value determined to be fair compensation for land based on its productive potential, the replacement cost of houses and structures (current fair market price of building materials and labor without depreciation or deductions for salvaged building material), and the market value of residential land, crops, trees, and other commodities. Resettlement Effect: Loss of physical and non-physical assets; including homes, communities, productive land, income-earning assets & sources, users of resources, cultural sites, social structures, networks/ties, cultural identity and mutual help mechanisms. Severely Affected: DPs who will experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10 percent or more of their productive assets (income generating). Squatters/Informal Settlers: People who occupy and use land without having any legal title, or right to use/possess the land/asset. Stakeholders: Include the DPs and communities, proponents, private and public businesses, the host communities and other concerned departments/agencies that may be affected, benefit, have a role in the implementation or may influence the Project. Vulnerable Groups: The marginalized or those distinct households or people who might face the risk of marginalization and suffer disproportionately from resettlement affects. These may include households with income below the poverty line, the landless, households headed by an elderly DP, female headed households DP, indigenous peoples, and those without legal title to land. Local Terms

pacca - house or structure with concrete construction and burnt bricks semi-pacca - house or structure constructed with burnt bricks and mud kacha - house constructed with un-burnt bricks and mud, or temporary wooden

poles/planks.


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY General The Jalalpur Irrigation Project (JIP) involves the construction of a new irrigation Canal of about 125 km, 23 distributaries and 10 minors to benefit over 315000 rural people of 109 Mouza in Jhelum district and 10 Mouza in Khushab Tehsil of District Khushab. The total CCA 174000 acres will be irrigated through the proposed project. Its direct beneficiaries will be small farmers who would get irrigation supplies and increased agricultural production. Apart from the irrigation development activities, 16 Nos. of Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs) will be constructed included improvement and rehabilitation of existing Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs). The Project would reduce land degradation and salinization being caused due to saline flow from many hill torrents. Other beneficiaries will include farm laborers, agro-based businesses/activities and women earnings through enhanced farming activities. The construction of the main canal, 23 distributaries, 07 minors and 16 flood carrier channels under the project will require the acquisition of land that result in unavoidable involuntary resettlement impacts. The design indicated that a total of acres of land will be acquired (478 acres for the ICB-P1, 4159 acres for ICB-P2 and 4050 acres for ICB-P3. It will also cause the removal of residential structures, cattlesheds, fixures (tube wells etc) and public structures (Schools & WADA electricity poles) and trees. For ICB-P3, to construct Main Canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750,10 distributaries, 05 minors and 08 FCCs, 3840 acres of private land and210 acres of Govt.totaling 4050 acres of land will be acquired.The 53355 DPs were found of the ICB-P3, out of which, 12 DPs will be affected losing their structures like residential, tube wells, water pipe lines,private, wash room and cattle sheds as well. Only 01 residential structures (sitting room) will be partially affected permanently with out physically displacement. The survey indicated that the land to be acquired is less in quantity as compared to land losers. The reason behind that a small piece of land to be acquired belonged to many other shareholders / family members in the revenue record. Moreover, 236 DPs found vulnerable while 1995 private owned trees belonged to 172 DPs will be uprooted for RoW clearance. For the compensation of all these project impacts, budget as per ADB guidelines and SPS 2009 have been allocated. Total 48 household ( with total person of 326) losing more than 10 percent of their productive land. According to ADB policy, preparation of full LARP depends upon the degree of severity caused by a project. In case the impacts are severe i.e. > 200 persons with > 10% percent income loss. Full LARP is also required if 100 or more affected people are vulnerable indigenous people.The Project falls in Category-A. This LARP is prepared and updated for ICB-P3. The implementation of this LARP will be synchronized with the construction schedule in the contract document. The Social and Environment Unit (SEU) under the PMO (Canals) will supervise the implementation of the LARP and resettlement activities at various stages of project. Project Location

The Jalalpur Main Canal with the total discharge of 1350 cusecs will off-take from river Jhelum at Rasool Barrage, about 45 km from Pind Dadan Khan, District Jhelum and 12 km from Mandi Bahauddin city. Its total length is 125 km (379+750 RDs). From the Main Canal, 23 distributaries and 07 minor canals with a length of 210 km (665 RDs) will off-take at various locations. All these distributaries are on the left side of the main canal to irrigate the command area. The nos. of Flood Carrier Channels (FCC) are 16 with the total length of 240 km. The location map of Jalalpur Irrigation Project area is provided as Fig:I.



Resettlement Processing Requirements

ADB approval and disclosure of this LARP is a condition for ADB appraisal of the Project. Subsequent resettlement-related conditions to be satisfied in order to implement the proposed project are as follows:

i. Conditions for awarding contract: approval by ADB and disclosure of the final

LARP based on detailed design.

ii. Condition to initiation of civil works implementation: Completion of compensation payments and assistance as per final LARP provisions as verified by an external monitor.

Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement For the construction of Main Canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750, 08FCCs and 10 distributaries, 4050 acres of land will be acquired. Out of total land to be acquired, 75acres (< 2 %) recorded under cultivation indicates that the DPs of this land will lose their livelihoods. The RoW of 235-250 ft (85 meters), 85-100 ft (33 meters) and 105-175 ft (25-58 meters) will be needed for construction purpose. The land fall in Tehsil Pind daden Khan of District Jhelum and Tehsil Khushab, District Khushab. Out of total structures affected DPs, 02 DPs were losing residential structures (one was under construction) as well. As per ADB guideline, the socio-economic survey of 1052 DPs showed that 48 percent of the DPs were literate. As far as the availability of social amenities were concerned, 93 percent of the surveyed DPs have access to electricity, while 92 percent have primary schools in their villages. The survey also revealed that women were 100 percent independent in their household activities and child caring but had less authority to decide about farm activities, livestock rearing, sale and purchase of property and social obligations. Legal Framework, Policy and Entitlements This LARP aims to ensure that DPs should improve their living conditions or at least not be worse off due to the Project implementation. To achieve the objective, the provisions and requirements under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009) concerning involuntary resettlement were followed. An Entitlement Matrix (EM) was prepared to compensate and assist the DPs in restoring their livelihoods and living conditions. Consultation, Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress The project will exert severe negative impact on the farming community due to construction of new irrigation system.About 94 percent land of Package-3 is barren land. All DPs will lose their land permanently,whileonly 02 DPs will lose their residential structures as well. Irrigation supply will be provided to the farmers to improve their agriculture. The DPs were quite satisfied with the valuation process and compensation rates for their affected assets/structures. Time to time discussions between the resettlement team and the design team, PID and other concerned departments were held to reduce severe negative impacts through design alteration.



Compensation, Relocation and Income Restoration For the LARP preparation, the compensation rates of various construction types are fixed in consideration of the prevailing construction market rates. All affected land and residential structures were considered for the compensation as per ADB Guidelines for resettlement. Land rates with 15 percent compulsory acquisition surcharge are applied, confirmed by the District Price Assessment Committee (DPAC) under the Chairmanship of Deputy Commissioners (DCs) Jhelum and Khushab Districts. Only 02 DPs will lose residential structures fall in Tehsil Pind Daden Khan, District Jhelum The compensation rates obtained from District Buildings Department Jhelum, Government of Punjab were applied, as provided in Annexure-III. In addition, livelihood, shifting and additional assistance allowances for vulnerable DPs have also been provided in the budget of the LARP. Institutional Framework The implementation of the LARP involves the role of different concerned departments including Punjab Irrigation Department (PID) as Executing Agency (EA), PMO (Canals), Project Design Advance (PDA) Consultants and local government. The Land Acquisition Collectors (LACs) has been nominated by the District Collectors for land identification as well as for preparation of land data and valuation of land, being acquired for the project. On the parallel, retired revenue patwaries were also hired to make maps, field books and jama bandies of the DPs for accurate and fair compensation. A Grievance Redress Committees (GRCs) will also be formed to address concerns of DPs and other stakeholders. An External Monitoring Consultant (EMC) will be engaged to monitor the LARP implementation. Resettlement Budget and Financing The resettlement budget is estimated based on the Resettlement survey at Pak Rs. 1112.16 million. This includes the compensation of land to be acquired, assets/structures to be dislocated, removal of trees and crop losses. In addition,severe impact allowance, livelihood, shifting and vulnerable allowances have been provided to the DPs. The cost of field staff training on LARP implementation and cost of M&E is also part of this budget. Implementation Schedule The LARP implementation will be synchronized with the construction schedule to avoid unnecessary and early eviction of the DPs. The DPs will be paid prior to relocation and will be given a period of two months for their shifting. The LARP tentative implementation schedule is presented in Fig: 8.1. Monitoring and Evaluation

Both internal and external monitoring will be carried out according to the Project activity schedule. Internal monitoring will be done by the SEU, with support from the PIC. For external monitoring, a qualified External Monitoring Consultant (EMC) approved by the ADB, will be hired by the PMO(Canals) from the market. For package-wise LARP, the EMC will verify the completion of compensation and provision of assistance and recommend issuing of no-objection for commencing civil works. For the duration of the Project, semi-annual internal and external monitoring reports will be submitted to the ADB for review. All monitoring reports will be disclosed in the PID and ADB websites for general public disclosure.


NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS 1-1

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Islamic Republic of Pakistan has received a loan, “Project Design Advance (PDA)”, from Asian Development Bank (ADB) for financing the cost of preparing detailed engineering design, construction drawings, bidding documents and safeguards plans for Jalalpur Irrigation Project (JIP). The Project is expected to increase agricultural production with development of sustainable agriculture to alleviate poverty in Jhelum, Pind Dadan Khan and Khushab Tehsils of Districts Jhelum and Khushab by providing canal irrigation supplies during Kharif season and reduce the land degradation by minimizing the use of marginal quality groundwater.The overall Project map covering all three Packages is provided in Fig:1. Output of the Project envisages construction of a new irrigation system including a Main Canal, 23 distributaries, 07 minors and appurtenant structures to irrigate about 174,000 acres of land in Tehsil Jhelum, Pind Dadan Khan and Khushab area. It also included the construction of 16 Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs) network to carry saline flood water of hill torrents (debouching over the command area) directly to Jhelum River. The command area of JIP is in the form of long strip of land bounded by the salt range hills on northern side and right bank of the Jhelum River on its southern side. The Main Canal would off-take from the right bank of the Rasool Barrage, for which provision for the canal head regulator already exists. The Main Canal of 1,350 cusec capacity will be about 125 km long and traverses along the foothills of the Salt Range. The distribution system will be about 210 km long comprising of 23 distributaries and 7 minor canals. About 506 structures of various kinds will be constructed across the Main Canal and its distribution system. The 16 FCCs will be constructed that will also act as collector channels for the drainage effluent and will be beneficial in reclaiming land affected by surface salinity. About 66 hill torrents of varying catchment sizes have been identified during the feasibility study which flow across the Project area and ultimately fall in Jhelum River. The Project will primarily benefit over 315,000 rural people of more than 114Mouza falling under the three proposedInternational Contract Biddings (ICBs). However, the list of 41Mouza/villages fall in JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 is provided in Table 1.2. Its direct beneficiaries will be small farmers who would get regular irrigation supplies during Kharif season and increased agricultural production. The Project would reduce land degradation and salinization being caused due to saline flow from many hill torrents. Other beneficiaries will include farm laborers and women through enhanced farming activities. Punjab Irrigation Department (PID) is the Executing Agency (EA). Feasibility study of Jalalpur Irrigation Project was prepared by NESPAK–ICS Joint Venture Consultants under grant ADB PPTA (8404-PAK) in 2015. As part of feasibility study in August 2017, PDA Consultants prepared Draft LARP for the whole project on the basis of detailed design and was submitted to ADB for Approval. Later on, JIP works were divided into three International Contract Packages (ICBs) and was agreed with ADB that LARP shall be prepared for each contract package respectively. For the whole project, 03 LARPs will be prepared corresponding to the three civil works contract packages (ICBs) mentioned below:

JIP/WKS/ICB-P1 RD 0+000 to RD 52+000: Main Canal, 01 Distributary, and 03 Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs).

JIP/WKS/ICB-P2 RD 52+000 to RD 225+500: Main Canal, 12 Distributaries, 02



Minor Canals and 05 Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs).

JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 RD 225+500 to RD 379+750: Main Canal, 10 Distributaries, 05 Minors and 08 Flood Carrier Channels (FCCs).

The Package wise land distribution to be acquired is as below: S.No Tesil-Activity-Canal Reach P1 P2 P3 Total

1 Tehsil Jhelum Main Canal RD 0+000 to RD 33+750

228 - - 228

2 Tesil PD Khan-FCC (1-3) 77 - - 77

3 Tesil PD Khan-Main Canal & Distys 173 1646 1003 2822

4 Tehsil PD Khan-FCCs(4-13) - 2513 1280 3793

5 Tehsil Khushab- Main Canal, Disyts & FCCs - - 1767 1767 Total 478 4159 4050 8687

The present LARP of ICB-P3 includes construction of long reach of main canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750, 10 distributaries, 05 minors and 08 FCCs. The Project falls in Category-A because 4050 acres of land will be acquired resultantly total of 53,355 persons were categorized as DPs under ICB-P3. Out of these, 12DPs will lose structures like residential, sump well/water course, boundary walls and cattle sheds. Only 02 residential structures (one was under construction) will be affected permanently. The survey indicated that the land to be acquired is less in quantity as compared to number of land losers. The reason behind that a small piece of land to be acquired belonged to many other shareholders / family members in the revenue record due to non-mutation of land.

The implementation of LARPs will be synchronized with the construction schedule in the contract document. 1.2 DESIGN LEVEL DETAILS According to the design, proposed appurtenant structures of JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 are given in Table 1.1:

Table 1.1: List of Proposed Structures of JIP- ICB-P3

S.No. Description Main Canal

Distributary Flood Carrier

Network Total

1 Distributary/Minor Head Regulator 9 4 13

2 Vertical Fall Structure 93 93

3 Glacis Fall Structure 17 17

4 Canal Syphon at RD 263+950/Mot0rway Crossing

1 1

Canal Syphon under 1 1

5 Bridges

Village Road Bridges 14 17 35 66 District Road Bridges 2 1 4 7 Arterial Road Bridges 3 2 5

6 Cross DrainageStructures

Depressed Drainage Culvert

8 5 13

Superpassage 1 1 Drainage Culvert 1 1

7 Cattle Ghats 12 11 23

8 Outlets 28 213 241

9 Tail cluster 15 15

10 FCN Outfalls 9 9 Total 79 377 50 506

Source: PDA Consultants, March, 2019.



This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) of JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 is prepared based on the final design from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750 covering 41Mouza. The population of these Mouza was projected at the growth rate of 2.10 percent as 115000. The total DPs of these Mouza were noted as 53355 and total land under project impacts calculated is 4050 acres. Out of which, 210 acres land belonged to government and 3840acres belonged to private owners. The names of these Mouza under irrigation Channels and FCCs are provided in the following Table 1.2.

Table 1.2: Distribution of Mouza amongst Main Canal, Distys and FCCsof P-3

1.3 ROW AND MEASURES TO MINIMIZE RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS The Right of Way (ROW) of the main canal is 265 ft. at start i.e. RD 225+500 and 280 ft. at the end of ICB-P3 i.e. RD 379+750. Between this reach, it varies 275 and 300 ft. Similarly, the average RoW of distribution system was 105 ft. and ROW of FCCs was175 ft. and 300 ft. The RoW of JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 of the main canal is shown as sample in Fig:1. During preparation of design, different alternative design options were considered and studied to minimize the resettlement impacts and ensure execution of the proposed works smoothly and in a sustainable manner. Most of the land is barren and not under cultivation. The farming community is satisfied on the project as they hope that their barren land will become fertile and under cultivation. Due to frequent meetings, consultations and focus group discussions with the DPs, their concerns were given weightage. The DPs concerns were discussed with the design section resulting minimized project impacts significantly in all three LARPs,especially, residential structures were avoided. The final alignment of the Main Canal and its distribution system included FCCs have insignificant impacts on residential and community structures. 1.4 OBJECTIVE OF THE LARP The Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) covers the land acquisition and resettlement impacts of the construction of the main canal, its distribution system and FCCs under JIP- ICB-P3 of the Project. The main objective of the LARP was to identify overall project impacts in the form of quantity and valuation. The LARP provides a clear picture of the project impacts, consultation with potential DPs, measurement of impacted structures and fair valuation for the compensation, procedure of the payment to the DPs and implementation of the LARP. It aims to enhance, or at least restore the livelihoods of all DPs

S. No.

Channel Tehsil/ Distt.

Name of Mouza

1

Main Canal

Jhelum

Bhelowal, Saroba, Ather, Ahmad abad, Langer, Lillah Bhera, Lillah Guj, Lillah Hindwana, Lillah Gharwana, Kahana, Dhuddi Thal, Shadi pur, Musiana,Kandwal.

Khushab Jaswal, Daiwal, Mangwal, Kurar, Talokar, Nari Shumali, Dhak

2

Distribution System

Jhelum Bhelowal, Saroba, Ather, Ahmadabad, Shadipur, Dhok Noora, Khichi, Lillah Guj, Musiana, Kahana, Bugga, Sial.Merey.

Khushab Jaswal, Daiwal, Mangwal,Talokar, Kurar, Nali Shumali, Nari, Dhak, Balwal, Katha saghral

3

FCCs

Jhelum

Bhelowal, Saroba, Ather, Ahmadabad, Thatti,,Langer,Qadirpur, Jandran,Dhuddi Thal, Easawal, Lillah Bhera, Lillah Hindwana, Lillah Bharwana,Shadipur, Dhok Noora, Khihchi, Lillah Guj, Musiana, Bugga, Sial

Khushab

Jaswal, Daiwal, Mangwal,Talokar, Kurar, Nali Shumali, Nari, Dhak, Balwal, Katha Saghral.



in real terms relative to pre-project level; and improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups in accordance with existing laws of Pakistan and according to the ADB SPS-2009. 1.5 RESETTLEMENT PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS Approval and disclosure of the LARP is a condition for ADB appraisal of the Project. Further, the following resettlement-related conditions are to be satisfied for the implementation of civil works under JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 of the Project:

Contract Awards Signing: Conditional to ADB cleared updated/final implementation ready package-wise LARP based on detailed design reflecting final impacts, list of DPs entitled for compensation, updated LARP budget reflective of compensation rates at replacement cost and relocation rehabilitation and income restoration costs with LARP implementation schedule synchronized with the construction activities. Commencement of Civil Works/Issuance of Notice-to-Proceed: Conditional to the full implementation of the LARP, including (a) compensation at full replacement cost paid to each DP for sections that may be handed over for construction; (b) other entitlements listed in the LARP have been provided as confirmed by an external monitoring agency/expert; and (c) a comprehensive income and livelihood rehabilitation program, supported by an adequate budget, is in place. ADB clearance of the internal and external monitoring report and no-objection is a condition for issuing the notice-to-proceed with civil works in sections with LAR impacts.

JIP-ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3 ,RD 225+500 to RD 379+750


Figure 1: Project Map Showing Channels Route and Resettlement Hotspots Sheet 1/3



Figure 1 ( Conti) : Project Map Showing Channels Route and Resettlement Hotspots Sheet 2/3



Figure 1 ( Conti) : Project Map Showing Channels Route and Resettlement Hotspots Sheet 3/3

JIP-ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3, RD 225+500 to RD 379+750


2. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

For the construction of Main Canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750, 10 distributaries with 5 minors and 08 FCCs, 4050 acres of 41 mouza will be acquired. Out of total mouza, 31mouza fall in the Tehsil Pind Daden Khan of District Jhelum and 10 mouza fall in Tehsil Khushab, District Khushab. The RoW of 235-250 ft (85 meters), 100-120 ft (40 meters) and 150-250 ft (50-85 meters) will be needed for the Main Canal, distributaries/minors and FCCs, respectively. Due to consultation with the DPs and meetings with the design engineers, a significant project impacts were minimized and avoided a large number of residential structures etc through the change of canal route. Due to impact on residential area, shrine, mosque and graveyard, the community raised their concerns. Some concerns were highlighted by the social team noted during routine resettlement survey and other were recorded through focus group discussions, while affected persons registered their complaints in writing and sent to higher authorities to address their issues. This caused delay due to repeatedly change of alignment and de-notification of Section 4. However, huge social issues were addressed.

2.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY As per practice adopted in the preparation of LARP ICB-P3, before start of actual resettlement survey, final design was collected, reviewed and consulted with the design engineer. Then demarcation and identification of land to be acquired was marked through GPS (global positioning system) on ground and also on Ux Shajra (Lathha) to find out the land and owners for preparation of DPs list. For this purpose, revenue retired patwaries were recruited, Recommended by the Assistant Commissioner/LAC, who were well conversant and knowledgeable with the local area and community. After identification of land and khasra jaat, data was prepared and formatted for Section-4 notification. According to the data, maps were also developed showing clear picture of channels‟ route and land to be acquired which was also submitted to the Client and the DC Jhelum. As per ADB guidelines, the Census Inventory Survey 100 percent, while Socio-economic was conducted based on final design through a trained and experienced team of sociologists led by Social Safeguards Specialist, by adopting a well-defined approach and methodology and in close coordination with the Revenue Department and LACs. The data was collected through structured questionnaires already approved by the ADB and used for preparation of draft LARP in August 2017 and up-dated LARPs of ICB-P1& P2 for assets inventory, socio-economic survey and gender survey as well. The Project will impact 53355 DPs of land and structures (Annexure-I & II). Out of which, 11 DPs will also be affected losing farm structures including other installations like tube well bore, sump wells and livestock sheds etc. However, 100 percent DPs will lose their part or full land permanently. Thelosing land between from I Marla to 3 kanal. It is pertinent to mention that majority of the DPs will lose their land less than 5 Marla due to non-mutation of land in the family causing significantly increase number of DPs, creating managerial problem and time taking process to pay compensation to all DPs. The value of time and process may be high than the compensation amount to be paid.



Although compensation of these DPs is beyond the control of the PID and are mainly dependent of the action of PMO-Canals with good-faith efforts to (a) contact and notify DPs through their last known address, village heads or kin; (b) inform DPs who to contact or where to proceed to collect their compensation; and (c) explore possible actions that may help them receive their compensation. SEU, with support from its consultants and the districts, will undertake continued community consultations and outreach in order to locate, assist and guide DPs with legal and administrative impediments. SEU with these efforts including multiple visits to villages. pending compensation payments, organizing village meetings, posting of notices in public places, serving notices at last known address of DPs and publishing the names of unpaid DPs in the print media/ announcement through local Cable is needed to demonstrate that due efforts were conducted to facilitate payment of compensation

2.1.1 Collection and Review of Secondary Data/Information All available data/information related to the Project area and Project components were collected from the Client, concerned Local Government Offices, Revenue Departments and Agriculture Departments of Jhelum and Khushab Districts. The District Census Reports (DCR) of Jhelum was also reviewed for projection, comparison and updating. The population of affected Mouza was projected on av. growth rate derived from web site of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Govt.of Pakistan. 2.1.2 Pre-Test of Questionnaires Four types of questionnaires were developed and submitted to the ADB for review. Comments received were incorporated. Moreover, the teams went to the field area for pretesting of the survey tools and modified these questionnaires where needed. The revised questionnaires were also shared with counterpart of ADB. Following four types of questionnaires were finalized for data collection:

Asset inventory census survey questionnaire, Baseline socio-economic survey questionnaire, Gender survey questionnaire,and Consultation

The sample format of these four questionnaires were approved by the ADB for Draft LARP in August 2017. 2.1.3 Collection of Primary Data Before collection of data for updated LARP, orientation of data collection was provided to the field teams comprising enumerators, sociologists and gender specialist by the Social Safeguards Specialist. Main points of the training were as following:

How to introduce yourself Project introduction and objectives of the project Purpose of data collection How to arrange FGDs and Consultation

A 100 percent resettlement survey was carried out to cover ICB-P3 area by using structured questionnaires. The field plan of different settlements having DPs was well planned and announcement made a couple of days in advance and also informed influential persons (Numberdar) with a list of DPs to call them at a common place to discuss and conduct interviews. It is very important to mention that there was a typical situation regarding land and owner of land. The problems faced to contact the DPs are mentioned below:



a) Due to degraded and major portion of barren/banjar land (land not available for cultivation owing to flood prone area, hill torrents and rocks/hilly area) in patches and parcels, major portion of the land was not under cultivation.

b) During socio-economic and resettlement survey, the owners of lands were identified as deceased that would may create a problem during payment of land compensation, because land record of revenue department does not show the dead owners. After 2008, most of the land record was not up dated. Many cases were not transferred to the present cultivators. It is fear that the present owners would not get land compensation because the land was in the name of previous sellers.

c) Keeping in view the quantity of private land to be acquired for ICB-P3, i.e. 4050 acres

seems large numbers, but because due to non-mutation of land, a small piece of land belonged to many shareholders or family members resulting significantly increased in the number of DPs.

d) Through Social Impact Assessment, vulnerable were identified and further verified by

the village head/chairman of Zakat Committee to pay the vulnerable allowance. Apart from socio-economic survey, the land jama bandi of left over Mouza were shared with the Chairmen/Village Numberdar to identify vulnerable(who seek zakat/financial support from the Government).

e) Cut-Off date:Onset of census of DPs i.e. 31-3-2019was established as cut-off date to

determine the eligibility for entitlements of compensation under the Project. The cut-off date was announced publicly during individual consultations as well as group discussions and community was informed that people moving into the ROW after this date will not be considered as entitled to any compensation.

f) The Authenticity of data is the responsibility of the revenue department. The

Consultants have identified the land to be acquired as per final design in association and support of revenue field staff for section-4. As far as affected structures and its DMS is concerned, the Consultants are confident of its validity. As far as land is concerned, due to non mutation of land, several DPs will lose their land in few feet area (less than half Marla) that looked too difficult to calculate of each DP share in land amongst other DPs. However, the Revenue department/LAC have skill and experience to resolve such issues without delay.

2.1.4 Data Analysis/ Computerization After data collection and preparation of field books/Jamabandies of land to be acquired, a huge data of land and DPs was computerized. An experienced team having computer operation skill also manual work spent many days to computerize the data of LARP P1,P2& P3. The photosnaps of working situation in the field office Pind Daden Khan is provided in the following.



2.2 PROJECT IMPACTS ASSESSMENT The Project impact will result in the loss of privately-owned land, trees,crops and structures. Detailed information of affected land included assets fall under JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 recorded during DMS and socio-economic surveys is provided in the following sections. 2.2.1 Impact on Private Land For JIP/WKS/ICB-P3of the Project will require 4050 acres of private included Govt. land. Of these, 792 acres are required for main canal, 808 acres for 10 distributaries and 2450 acres for 8FCCs. The data obtained from revenue departments (computerized jama bandies)indicated that only 75 acres (>2 %) was recorded under cultivation by the actual 1370 cultivators. This land belonged to villages Malyar, Mandehr, Dhaak, Nari shumali and Nalli shumali. Most of these villages are situated near the river Jhelum. The Farmers have installed their own private tubewells for pumping fresh ground water for their agriculture. Out of these 5 mouza, 3 villages fall in Khushab project area. The data is provided in Table 2.2& Table 2.3.The land to be acquired is located in Tehsil Pind Daden Khan of Jhelum district and Tehsil Khushab, District Khushab. There was no informal land users of75 acres under cultivation. The actual cultivators will be considered for the loss of livelihood, but mostly, 4-8 DPs belonged to one family and cannot categorize them vulnerable. A brief on land to be acquired is provided in Table 2.2 below, while Table 2.3 indicates total land included Government land under project impact. The method and procedure of 6 steps used to acquire land was as under, while photographs of procedure are provided in Annexure-XI.

a) Provision of final design; b) Design uploaded in the GPS; c) Land identification survey through revenue patwaries with Ux shajra to mark canal

route and highlight khasra/plot number on Ux shajra; d) Based on marking of canal route on Ux shajra, land to be acquired was identified; e) Based on land identification, the land record for section-4 was prepared; f) With the help of land record, khatooni,field book and jama bandi (Tatimma), share of

each DP and lists of owners were prepared ; g) Lists were used for conducting interviews of socio-economic and resettlement

survey. The Project will impact 1370 actual cultivators of land under cultivation who are losing income from crops, 01 owner of residential land (sitting room) and 51,975 owners of flood-prone/uncultiviable land, 172 DPs losing 1995 trees and 11land owners who are losing fixtures and livestock sheds and No residential structures was found under project impact. Among those losing land under cultivation, 48 owners/cultivators with the total 326 persons will lose 10% or more of their productiveland. There are also 236 affected land owners with the total 1652 persons who are vulnerable. Table 2.1 shows the summary of impacts and the number and categories of persons losing land. Details are provided in Annexures I, II, IV,VII& VIII

Table 2.1: Summary of Impacts and Categories of Land Owners of P3

Type of Persons Displaced Persons Category Number

Persons losing land 53,355

- Agricultural (75 acres of productive land) Present cultivators 1370

- Residential Land owner 01

- Flood-prone/Uncultiviable Land owner 51,975

Persons losing 10% or more of productive land Land owner 48

Persons losing structures 12



Type of Persons Displaced Persons

Category Number

- Residential structures Structure owner 0

-

- Farming and other structures incl. tubewell Structure owner 10

Persons losing income from crops Land owner/cultivator 1370

Persons losing trees

- Non-fruit trees (1995 units) Owner 172 Persons required to relocate. NO need Details are provided in Table 2.5

Owner 0

Persons losing business Owner 0

Persons losing jobs from affected business Worker 0

Vulnerable DPs (236 DPs with 1652 persons) Vulnerable households (household members)

236 (17.22%)

Person women Headed Household Vulnerable/widow 0

All Persons will lose their land permanently. The average lost land betweenfrom 50 sft to >3 kanal. Majority of the DPs will lose less than 5 marla of land. The non-mutation of land records has resulted in the huge number of registered names associated with the land to be acquired. Table 2.2 and 2.3 show the size and type of land to be lost by the DPs.

Table 2.2:Land to be Acquired for JIP/WKS/ICB-P3 (Acres)

Area

Distribution of Land to be Acquired Total

Main Canal Distribution

System Flood Carrier

Channels

Tehsil PD Khan/ Khushab

792

808

2450

4050

Table 2.3:Category of Impacted Land and DPs of ICB-P3

Category Main Canal

(Acres)

Distys. (Acres)

Flood Carrier

Channels (Acres)

Total (Acres)

Total DPs (No.)

Private land for agricultural use

- 25 50

75

(1.9%)

1370

Private, residential use etc 8 2

10 ( 0.2 %)

10

Private, flood prone, banjer qadeem, (gher mumkin kassi) not suitable for agriculture use)

784

768

2203

3755

(92.7 %)

51,975

Govt. land under use of roads,bridges and crossings of channels

0 15 195

210

(5.2 %)

0

Total 792 808 2450

4,050 (100%)

53,355

Source: PDA Design Consultants/JIP revenue staff, -Feb. 2019



Of the total land to be acquired, only 2percent land was identified “good” for agriculture/farming followed by 92.7 percent fall in flood prone area. Only 0.20 percent land was recorded under the use of residence and roads and canal, Distys and FCCs crossings.

2.2.2 Project Impact on Government Land

A small portion of 210 acres land (5.7%) scattered over the project area of ICB-P3 was recorded belonged to Government land. This land is being used for roads and bridges etc. The detai;s of the land is provided in the Annexure-II. No land compensation will be paid as it is already Govt. acquired land, hence no provision is made in the budget. After construction of irrigation channels,these roads and bridges will have to restore for the public use and facility immediately.

2.2.3 Impact on Private Residential structures, Cattlesheds and Fixtures

The survey of the ICB-P3 identified a total 12 privately-owned structures (i.e. sitting room, cattle sheds, sump well, boundary walls and irrigation plastic/cement pipes showed in Table 2.4 below owned by 12 DPs. Among these DPs, one DP will lose only sitting room separate from family main structures and no need to relocate. After conducting DMS, data on the different types of affected privately-owned structures falling in RoW of the distributary and FCCs with the details regarding type of construction, category of affected structures, compensation rates and total compensation cost of each DP has been provided in Annexure-I.

Table 2.4:Private Affected Structures Located in the RoW under Project Impacts

Sr. No. Permanent Affected Structures

Structures (No.)

DPs (No.)

1 Residential Structures (only sitting room) 01 01

2 Cattle shed 03 03

3 Agri. Sump well/ water course 02 02

4 Water pipe lines 02 02

5 Boundarywalls 04 04 Total Structures under project impact 12 12

Source: Census Survey of the Project Area by JIP Social Consultants February- March. 2019

2.2.4 DPs’ Assessment of Relocation of Their Residence One DP will lose only drawing/sitting room (sitting room/ bethak) separate from family main residential structures. He has enough place in the existing plot to reconstruct a room. In both cases, no relocation is needed and no livelihoods will be disturbed. The Table 2.5 provides the details of these DPs.

Table 2.5: Assessment of Relocation of Structure of ICB-P3

Sr. No.

DP’s Name Father’s Name

Persons Living in Structure

(No.)

Relation with family

Location Status/Relocation Preference

FCC-9/1

Wali Mohd

0

Head of Family

Bhelowal

His only sitting room(bethak for outsiders) will be impacted. He has a large family residential structure behind the impacted sitting room ( Photo in Annex-IX).

He has a spacious courtyard between main structure and impacted room.

He can re build a new room in the ourtyard without relocation of other family structures. His livelihoods will not be disturbed and no

1 M.Sadiq



Sr. No.

DP’s Name Father’s Name

Persons Living in Structure

(No.)

Relation with family

Location Status/Relocation Preference

need of relocation.

He will be paid for structure and shifting.

2.2.5 Impact on Crops As far as the impact on crops is concerned, the crop compensation has been calculated as per revenue record. The revenue record showed the type of land i.e. lands fall in river, land is irrigated by the tube wells or land is affected by the flood channels etc. Total private land under project impact is 3840 acres, out of which,75 acres land (600 kanals) found under cultivation by the actual 1370 cultivators (Annexure-II) and the livelihood of the farmers/DPs were depended upon their productive land producing crops. The net income per kanal per year comes out Rs.6813 per annum. Keeping in view the impacts on the crops, the crop compensation of both crop seasons will be provided to the DPs.

On overall basis, about 2 percent land (75 acres in rabi and in kharif) of ICB-P3 was under cultivation. Agriculture was being done through tube wells as well or by lift irrigation from river at few locations. Mostly, wheat and fodder was cultivated in the Rabi season, whereas, seasonal fodder and rice ( in some area) was sown in Kharif season. But the Rabi crop yield was better as compared with Kharif crops. Keeping in view the impacts on the crops, the crop compensation of both crop seasons will be provided to 1370 DPs.

During socio-economic survey of 1052 DPs, data regarding land under cultivation, type of crop, expenditures per acre included land preparation, seed, irrigation water, fertilizer ,pesticides and labor and yield and market value was collected and calculated net income per acre. The calculation indicated that in Rabi season, per acre net income comes out Rs.32000 while in Kharif season, the net income was Rs.22500 per acre. The results are based on land available for agriculture as indicated in Table 2.2. During updating of LARP-P3, no difference was recorded with in gap of LARP-P1 & P2 and same data is applicable as mentioned in the Table 2.6 below.

Table 2.6:Cropped Area and Crop Yields of ICB-P3

Season/Crop Planted Cropped

Area (Acres)

Average Yield Per Acre

(1 ond=40Kg)

Average Price of Crop

(Rs/40 kg)

Average Net Income per Acre

(Rs.)

Rabi Season

Wheat 50 35 1250 32000

Rabi Fodder 25 25 1100 22500 Kharif Season

Rice 5 30 1250 9850

Kharif Fodder 70 40 850 24000 Source: Survey by PDA Social teams, February – May, 2019.

2.2.6 Impacts on Private Owned Non-Fruit Trees

A total numbers of 1995 private non fruit trees of 172 DPs will be uprooted from the RoW of the proposed channels of ICB-P3. All non-fruit trees are kiker followed by shesham(dalbergia). Very few trees were found as sharin and neem (margosa). A brief data of affected trees in the main canal, distributaries and FCCs is provided in Table 2.7. The owners of trees will be compensated as described in the Section of Entitlement Eligibility. The criteria is explained in Section 5.6 and chainage wise details of trees belonged to DPs is provided in Annexure-IV.



Table 2.7:Trees to be Uprooted from ROW under Project Impacts of ICB-P3

Sr. No.

Channel DPs (Ns.)

Trees (No.)

1 Main Canal (684 mature+511 Sapling) 89 1195

2 Distribution system (172 mature+157 sapling) 41 329

3 FCCs (183 mature+ 288 sapling) 42 471

Total 172 1995

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants, Feb - May, 2019.

Due to cutting of large number of trees and to mitigate the adverse environmental impact on surroundings. Plantation through the Forest Department on the both sides of main canal and distributaries will be planned to save the environment. The owners of these trees will be compensated and the compensation amount has been allocated in the budget. 2.2.7 Impacts on Fruit Trees

As far as fruit trees are concerned,during trees counting survey, no fruit trees were recorded under project impacts. The main reason was that a vast area is lying without cultivation due to brackish water and not fit for tree plantation except local and wild plants etc

2.2.8 Impacts on Government Trees

In the alignment of irrigation channels of ICB-P3, total 63trees (58 mature and 5 sapling) grown in the land of Railways, Highways and Shamlat, but these trees belonged to Forest department. All these afftected trees are non-fruit trees. The description of compensation is provided in the Section 5.7. The Valuation of these trees is explained in the Section 2.7.The PMO(Canals) will coordinate with the relevant department to sort out its removal and method of compensation.

2.2.9 Impact on Public Structures In the alignment of ICB-P3, total 18 electricity poles of WAPDA are identified to be removed from the route of irrigation channels of main canal,distributaries and flood carrier channels. The location and compensation cost to shift these electric poles are provided in the Annexure-VI. Following are the the State property/assets under Project impacts:

Table 2.8:Govt. Land,Trees and Fixtures under Project Impacts of ICB-P3

S.No Assets Nos

1 Land (acres) 210

2 Trees 63

3 WAPDA electricity poles 18

Similarly, the irrigation channels and FCCs impacted village metal roads, highways, railways track and Kacha tracks at few places. The rehabilitation and re-installation of these impacted items will be carried out by the Contractor through “WORKS” contract.



2.2.10 Impact on Community Structures

In the ICB-P3 project area, peoples are facing severe problem of fresh drinking water. Availability of sweet water is a miracle that is available in few places. To meet the drinking waterrequirement, several water pumps/turbines are installed on the bank of river Jhelum at various locations. Then through pipes of different length, the sweet water is supplied to the villages and further distributed to each house.

2.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DPS’ HOUSEHOLDS The analysis is based on the findings of the socio-economic survey of 1052 sample DPs. Amongst the total contacted DPs, 983 were male DPs and 69 were female DPs. The study aimed at to assess the present condition of the DPs and to appraise the project impacts on their livelihoods. This section provides information on the demographic characteristics, education, health, Occupations, sources of income, pattern of household expenditures, etc. of the DPs. 2.3.1 Household Composition and Working Household Members Among the surveyed households, there were more males (51 percent) than females (49 percent) members. Around 22 percent of the household members are children below 10 years of age. The average family size works out 6.5. About 1936 household members (44 percent) were in the working age population comparatively low to ICB-P2.. Total 6871 population of 1052 Respondents, the working household members were also calculated. The Data indicated that 4398 persons were in the working age group. Out of this,1936 (44 percent) were engaged in different activities. The details is provided in the following Table:2.9.

Table 2.9:Percentage of Working Household Members of DPs

2.3.2 Education and Literacy Level of Household Members The literacy level of ICB-P3 was different as of ICB-P2 due to income difference. Around 48 percent of the members of the DPs were literate. Out of the total literate, the persons having primary level of education were 10 percent. Household members with middle level education were 14 percent and having matriculation level education were 7 percent. Household members with intermediate and graduation level education were 10 percent. One percent was found having religious education. The illiterate population was recorded at 30 percent. The information in respect of education and literacy level of the members of the DPs‟ households is provided in Table 2.10.

Occupations Working Members

of DPs (No.)

Percentage (%)

Agriculture/ Livestock 684 35

Government and / Privates Service Employees 580 28

Working Abroad 98 5

Laborer 238 12

Service Providers (Including Teachers, Advocates and etc. 127 7

Pensioners 185 10

Business 28 1

Shopkeepers 38 2 Total Working Population 1936 (44%) 100



Table 2.10:Literacy Rate and Education Level of Members of DPs’ Households

Sr. No.

Education Level Number

(No.) Percentage

(%)

1 Primary 729 10

2 Middle 966 14

3 Matriculate 1039 15

4 Intermediate 301 4

5 Graduate 137 2

6 Post Graduate 86 1

7 Others 46 1

Literate 3295 48

8 Illiterate 3072 30

9 Children up to 10 years 1504 22

Total 6871 100

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants,January- May, 2019.

2.4 OCCUPATION, INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF THE SAMPLE RESPONDENTS

All the surveyed DPs were land owners. Due to scarcity of water, the lands were becoming barren and the farmers depended on rains for cultivation. Their cultivation was associated with the intensity of rains. Due to shortage of water and disappointment from yearly low crop yields, many of them have adopted occupations other than farming for their livelihoods. The occupations have been categorized based on primary source of income. The sample survey has revealed that almost, 46 percent DPs were engaged in farming and its related activities including livestock rearing etc., followed by those working in the government, private sectors and abroad (13 percent), the pension holders and service providers with 21 percent and 3 percent, respectively. A small proportion of DPs (5 percent) work as laborers. A small percentage of DPs i.e. 1 percent were involved in business like shop and hotel. Overall, 54 percent interviewed DPs were earning from non-agriculture activities. Most of the interviewed DPs were engaged in one activity. Most of the family members were working in the local factories i.e. three cement factories, Imperial Chemical Industry (ICI) Khewra, Salt mines Khewra and other mines in the Project area of ICB-P3. were engaged inTable 2.11 below shows the occupation of the surveyed DPs.

Table 2.11:Occupationsof Respondent DPs

Sr. No.

Occupation InterviewedDPs

(No.) Percent

(%)

1 Agriculture/livestock 491 46

2 Shopkeeper 18 02

3 Pensioners 217 21

4 Service Providers 37 03

5 Laborer 56 05

6 Govt. /Private Employees 137 13

7 Working Abroad 17 02

8 Business 10 01

9 House wife 69 07

Total 1052 100

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants,January-May, 2019.

The explanation to various occupation categories of interviewed DPs is given below: (i) Agriculturist/Livestock (491 DPs)



In the rural society, land is considered a mark of prestige and mode of power to influence other. If a person has a large piece of land, he possesses influence and power to control other peoples. The DPs under this occupation category will lose their land permanently, but they hope that with the availability of canal supplies, their remaining lands will become under cultivation resultantly more production and more earning.

(ii) Shopkeepers (18 DPs)

The DPs of ICB-P3 had established their own source of income. Their small shops were located outside the RoW and no such DPs will lose his income from small business. They were losing land and not worried about their shops etc.

(iii) Pension Holders (217 DPs)

The district Jhelum is famous due to representation of its population in Pakistan Army. Due to barren land, most of the people joined Pakistan Army for their livelihood. They have also small piece of land that was not sufficient to fulfill the domestic expenditures like kitchen grocery, clothing, education of the children and other social obligations. They were least bothered about their small piece of land to be acquired for the project, because they depend on their pension to support their families.

(iv) Service Providers (37 DPs)

This category of DPs belonged to farming community. But the low income from land never supported to their family needs, so they were forced to adopt different occupation by which they can earn more than that of small piece of land. Such DPs will shift their workplace near by the existing and restart their earning.

(v) Laborers (56 DPs)

These DPs were found doing on daily base job for their livelihood. They showed their feelings that they were happy with the project as they would be able to get job for a long time. These DPs will be compensated against losing their land or structures as per ADB resettlement policy.

(vi) Govt./Private Service (137 DPs)

Out of total DPs, this category was spending their lives comfortably as they have permanent source of income by which, they can fulfill their domestic expenses easily. They were also least bothered about the acquisition of their lands. However, they will be compensated as per ADB policy.

(vii) Working Abroad (17 DPs)

They were working abroad mostly in Middle East countries. Most of them were working over there as drivers and guards etc. They will also lose their land and will be compensated as per ADB IR policy.

(viii) Business (10 DPs)

The DPs of ICB-P3 fall in this category had established their small business. Their business do not exist in ROW and will not be disturbed their livelihoods.



(ix) Housewife (69)

The DPs will also lose their land. Some of them have enough monthly income while other fall in poverty. They will be compensated as per ADB IR policy.

2.4.1 Income of the Respondents Income and source of income is an important factor to run a family system smooyhly. An adequate and permanent source of income leads to rational planning of a family. The monthly income allows a family to plan and manage their kitchen, education of the children, social obligations and living status in the society. Data was collected of the sample respondents and is provided in the following Table 2.12.

Table 2.12:Monthly Income Range of the Respondents of P3

Sr. No.

Income Range (Rs.)

Respondents (No.)

Percent (%)

1 Up to 15000 80 8

2 +15000 to 25000 434 41

3 +25000 to 35000 228 22

4 Above 35000 310 29 Total 1052 100

Average Monthly Income (Rs.) 33618

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants, January-May, 2019.

The average monthly income comes out Rs 33618. Among the surveyed DPs, 80 DPs (8 percent) were found having monthly income below the Official Poverty Line (OPL). The Jamabandi of each Mouza was shared with the Chairman/ Village Numberdar for the verification of DPs fall in vulnerable category (who are registered for zakat). The remaining 156 DPs were found through this process. Thus the total vulnerable were recorded as 236 DPs. 2.4.2 Expenditures of Respondents The expenditures of the household depends on income. The household income permits to the head of household to spend money on different items. If the monthly income is reasonable and enough, the luxurious items like motor cycle, car, air conditioner, refrigerator, quality education of the children and graceful living status will be adopted and followed. In case of limited source of income, the kitchen becomes too difficult and only dream of luxurious life. The baseline information relating to the household expenditure pattern in respect of sample respondents (DPs) is shown in Table 2.13.

Table 2.13:Expenditures of Respondents

Sr. No.

Description Expenditures

Monthly (Rs.) Percent

1 Food Expenses 1.41,11,400 48

2 Non-Food Items 1,01,81,292 39

3 Utilities 26,84,602 09

4 Health Care 11,30,150 04

Total Expenditure of 1052 Respondent DPs 4,42,18,238 100

Average Monthly Expenditure per DP 25,859

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants, January-May, 2019



The data indicates that the expenditure on food and non-food items comes to about 77 percent of total expenditure of a household whereas, the expense on utilities and health care has 9 percent and 4 percent respectively of total household expenditures. The average saving rate was 23 percent. The saving trend indicated that the Project area falls in rural area having traditional culture and social values. The people avoid from lavish and un necessary expenditures. In the whole Project area, there is no cinema hall,luxury restaurants, recreational parks and other entertainment to spend money. Most of the families spend their savings on social obligations, construction of pacca/semi pacca house on priority (98 % pacca house) followed by education of their children, purchase of motor cycle, refrigerator, marriage of siblings and purchase of mobile phone etc. An analysis of the income and expenditures of these households show that they are generally spending less than their income. 2.4.3 Land Holding Status of Respondents

The data of land holding status is comprised 100 percent DPs losing their land due to land acquisition for Jalalpur irrigation Project. The data revealed that majority of the DPs (41 percent) belonged to very small farming community. The data provided in Table 2.10 clearly indicated that 46percent DPs were dependent on land while 54 percent adopted other occupations to meet their household expenditures. The data of Table 2.14 below confirm the situation that DPs were small farmers. Only 23 percent DPs had land above 15 acres depend on rain and land under cultivation was noted as 05 percent only in ICB-P3.The Table 2.14 below shows the land holding status of the surveyed DPs.

Table 2.14:Land Holding Status of Respondents

Sr. No.

Categories Respondents (No.)

Percent (%)

1 Upto 5 acres 432 41

2 +5 to 10 acres 228 22

3 +10 to 15 acres 152 14

4 Above 15 acres 240 23 Total 1052 100

Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants, July 2018- January 2019.

2.4.4 Vulnerable DPs

The distinct people who might face the risk of marginalization and suffer disproportionately from resettlement affects, including the women, destitute persons, squatters; those with historical or cultural usufruct rights; and landless groups. Households which are below the poverty line or zakat deserving DPs are considered vulnerable. In this Project, affectees losing land and structures have been considered for the identification of the vulnerable. 2.4.4.1 IdentifIcation of Vulnerable

During the socio-economic survey, 80 vulnerable were identified from 1052 interviewed, further verified by the Chairmen/Numberdars. Later on, Chairman/Numberdar ofall Mouza/villages were approached and provided Mouza wise land Jamabandi of DPs. They were requested to identify/confirm such DPs among the lists, which are eligible for zakat (financial support to the vulnerable and poor by the government). In this way, further 156 DPs were identified vulnerable confirmed by the Chairman/Numberdars. Out 0f 156 DPs, 34 DPs land was not transferred in their names in the revenue record. The land was still in their fathers,s name but they were actual owners and cultivators hence their monthly income was below OPL(Rs.17500/month) that was verified officially.These 34 vulnerable DPs are not



shown in the Annexure-II, while their details are provided with bold font in the Annex-VII, Whereas, Mouza wise scanned lists of these vulnerable signed by the concerned Chairman/Numberdar are attached in Annexure-XVI.

Severely Affected DPs In the area, the land that was productive producing crops and trees and DPs were dependent their livelihood and kitchen. If they are losing >10 percent,they are considered severely affectees of the project. On the other side, the DPs owning barren and unproductive land were already not earning any thing from the land, so they will lose only land and not losing their livelihood. They will be compensated of their land only. The data was analyzed base on the factor of productive and unproductive land. According to the data provided in Table 2.3, 1370DPs wereactual cultivators/DPs of 75 acres of 5 mouza. Out of these,48were identifiedseverely affected households (losing 10% or more of their productive land). Although these DPs are losing a very small piece of land ( from few marla to 3 kanals), which does not affect their livelihood, hence were considered severely affected DPs. These DPs are provided a severe impact allowance equal to one year crop income has been provided to each DP in the Annexure-II and also in the budget.The list of these severely affected DPs households is provided in Annexure-VIII.

Ethnicity (Caste Group) During the project survey, different caste groups prevailed in the project area. The data indicated almost the same caste as were in P1& P2. Amongst the caste groups, Raja, Dhudhi, Awan, Malik, Mangwal, Lillah, Syed, Shirazi, Jaswal, Musiana, kurar,Gujjar, Malyar, Jatt Tawangar, Arain, Gondal, Baloch,Mughal, Ranjha and Qureshi were the main caste in the area. While Jatt, Raja, Awan and Gondal are the prominent caste in ICB-P3 area. 99.9 percent were Muslims and the rest fall in non-muslim (Christian) community in the area. 2.4.5 Indigenous People As far as existence of Indigenous People (IPs) is concerned, no such tribe/ community was reported in area under Package-3. 2.4.6 Available Social Amenities in the Project Area Electricity was available in the project area. However, not all households have access. Only 07percent of the surveyed households have no access to the electricity but 72 percent showed their satisfaction. Education was the other second facility, which was available in the area to 92 percent of the respondents. Out of them, 91 percent were satisfied with the quality of services, while 09 percent showed their dissatisfaction. Health care facility in shape of BHUs and RHCs was available to about 43 percent of the surveyed population. Out of these, 81 percent were satisfied with the available health facilities. Availability of sewerage/ open drainage facility was reported by 33 percent of the respondents and about 66 percent were satisfied with the quality of services provided. Other amenities like gas and telephone were partially available in the project corridor. The information in respect of access to social amenities and their quality of services is given in Table 2.15.

Table 2.15:Access to Social Amenities in the Project Area (Percent)

Sr. No. Facility Available Not Available Satisfactory

1 Electricity 93 07 72

2 Gas 06 94 100

3 Water Supply 76 24 57

4 Telephone/Mobile 71 29 70



Sr. No. Facility Available Not Available Satisfactory

5 Sewerage 33 67 66

6 BHU 43 57 81

7 School 92 08 91

Source: Updated Survey by JIP Social Consultants, January- May. 2019.

2.4.7 Housing Conditions Housing conditions of the respondents have been analyzed according to the type of houses in which they were residing. These are categorized as pacca house, semi-pacca house and kacha house. The house or building constructed with concrete or burnt bricks fall in pacca category whereas house or building constructed with burnt bricks with mud comes under semi-pacca category while house constructed with mud bricks or temporary wooden logs etc are categorized as kacha house. The information about the housing conditions of the respondent DPs reflected in Table 2.16 below reveals that 93 percent of the respondents lived in pacca houses followed by 06 percent living in semi-pacca and only 01 percent in kacha houses. The reason of constructing pacca houses is that most of the project area falls under the bout of mountain floods and the surroundings. The other reason is hilly flood water damages the kacha house rapidly. The description of income in section 2.4.1 showed reasonable saving i.e. 23 percent forced to build their structures as pacca for long lasting.

Table 2.16:Housing Conditions of Respondents

Sr. Housing Conditions Respondents

(No.) Percent

(%)

1 Pacca 978 93

2 Semi Pacca 59 06

3 Kacha 15 01 Total 1052 100

Source: Updated Survey by JIP Social Consultants, January-May, 2019

2.5 GENDER SURVEY According to the population census 2018, the sex ratio of males and females is 51 and 49 percent respectively. In the rural society, female plays important role in managing household from home chores to work in the fields and taking care of the livestock as well. Rural-women are major contributors in four sub-sectors of the rural economy; (i) crop production,(ii) livestock rearing,(iii) cottage industry and (iv) household & family maintenance activities, such as fetching water, fuel collection and fodder for livestock, food preparation & preservation and caring for children. Most of their work and labor does not carry weight, unrecognized and unappreciated. Regarding education of women,the literacy rate of Pakistani women is among the lowest in the world partly because the educational sector as a whole has been neglected by the successive governments. Girls are far more deprived of education than boys. This deprivation is more severe in the rural areas. There is no prominent difference regarding female status and empowerment between ICB-P2 and P3. The rigid and obstinate traditions and attitudinal problem is the major hurdle in the way of women‟s education in Pakistan especially in the rural areas. People consciously or unconsciously are reluctant to send their daughters to schools. They believe that giving the right of education to a girl may divert her attention from her home responsibilities. Moreover, such people do not consider education as a basic human right; rather they



consider it a luxury, extravagance and a mere wastage of money. Some parents perceive the „costs‟ of educating girls to be high without any return. Since males are supposed to earn for their dependents, therefore, it is believed that there is no need for women‟s education as they do not have to earn for their families rather it will be for her in-laws. Traditionally, a large section of society still considers it highly immoral for a girl to go for a job. Female Education in Pakistan, its status and standard particularly is at the lowest ebb tide. Thousands of girls‟ otherwise intelligent and capable enough to get education, but are deprived of because of multifarious socio-cultural and economic reasons and gender prejudices. This is culturally prevailing in the country that, assets and properties are managed and controlled by the male of the household. In most of the cases, men are titled with the ownership of land but women are also title holder for land ownership in many cases but 100 percent of the respondents reported that female alone cannot sell or purchase their properties. Mostly, the males do such activities. Females are dependent to their male members for land matters. Besides this, the females of the households are the responsibility of their male members. In case of relocation from residential structures, the females will follow the decisions of their male members. Keeping in view the important role of the female in the household as well as in the society, gender consultations were also conducted in 12 settlements to record the views of the females (list of participants is provided in Table 2.17 and photographs are presented in Annexure-XIV. During interviews and consultation, data was also collected to ascertain female social status and gender issues.

Table 2.17:Location Wise Number of Participants of Gender Consultations

Sr. No. Mouza/ Village Name of Channel No. of Participants 1 Thatti MC+ FCC-9/2 19 2 Ather Disty-15, FCc-10 18 3 Saroba Disty-14, FCC-9 & 10 15 4 Lillah Bhera MC+FCC12 18 5 Jaithal MC+FCC12 21 6 Kandwal MC+Disty.18 & 19 22 7 Mangwal MC+Disty-17, FCC14 12 8 Jaswal MC+FCC14 & 15 13 9 Daiwal MC+Disty 17 29 10 Nari Shumali Dist-22 & 23+ FCC16 12 11 Jandran Disty. 17, FCC 11 18 12 Jattu Disty.17 20

Total 217 Source: Survey by JIP Social Consultants May,.2019.

Women participate in various activities including household activities, child caring and importantly in income generation activities like management of livestock and fields work in the season of sowing and harvesting of crops. A very low number in females was reported in the government and private sector to help their male members in managing the household expenses who were serving as teacher in private schools and in a hospital. These females were belonging to villages Rawal, Samanwal,Daulat pur and Kaslian.



Data regarding education of the females revealed that there were no constraints for females in going to schools and colleges except they have to travel a lot to the nearby villages and cities for higher education. In spite of that, the trend of getting education is increasing in the area and parents treat equally to the boys and girls in getting education It was also observed that the participants were not satisfied with the available health facilities. There was no proper and equipped health center for the females. Females were forced to become the victims of the traditional practitioners and midwives. It was also derived from the Consultations that NGOs like NRSP and Akhuwat were existed to provide social services to the community members especially to the females playing pivotal role in poverty alleviation through soft loans. It was also observed that except of few cases, there was no gender based violence prevailed among the surveyed communities. The credit goes to vibrant media to create awareness to stop such malpractice. The new educated generation also discouraged their males from this bad culture. The collected data revealed that the most pressing needs of women were the availability of proper health and education facilities like hospital & college nearby in the area. Establishment of technical training centers and construction of roads may also play role to improve their condition. They were assured that during the construction works, their mobility and privacy will not be disturbed as their residential areas will be protected. 2.5.1 Women’s Role in Socio-economic Activities The survey data of ICB-P3 revealed the similar findings as of ICB-P1& P2 that the participation rate of women in various socio-economic activities in the project corridor is generally high, 100 percent in case of household activities and child caring. Their participation rate in case of property matters, social obligations, farm activities and livestock rearing stood at 10 percent, 100 percent and 10 percent each respectively. None of the respondent females were reported to be involved in the socio-political activities. As far as decision making for different activities is concerned, their involvement in case of child caring matters and household activities was the highest;100 percent whereas, in case of farm activities/matters was at second; about 50 percent. For other matters, the involvement of the women was between these two limits. Information in respect of women‟s participation and decision making in the routine socio-economic life is presented in Table 2.18.

Table 2.18:Women’s Role in Socio-economic Activities

Sr. No.

Item Participation

(%) Decision Making

(%)

1 Household Activities 100 100

2 Child Caring 100 100

3 Farm/Crop Activities 10 50

4 Livestock Rearing/up keeping 10 50

5 Sale & Purchase of Property 10 20

6 Social Obligations 100 90

7 Local Representation - -

Source: Gender Survey by JIP Social Consultants. Februar-May, 2019.



2.6 CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISM IN THE PROJECT AREA In the Rural communities, disputes arise upon minor issues. Generally, local disputes are settled through Panchayat. Panchayat is an informal but well organized conflict resolving mechanism exists in the Project area. At present, this system has been regularized in the prevailing local bodies system. Yet most of the conflicts and disputes are being settled through panchayat. According to the Panchayat mechanism, the influential of the area, a community representative (Chairman/Counselor), local religious leader and village NumberdarChaudhry), after hearing the parties, play their role to resolve the reported dispute/conflict with mutual consensus. If any of the party is not satisfied with the decision of the Panchayat, then they are free to lodge complaint to police station or court of law. Generally, the people prefer to settle their disputes through the Panchayat to avoid from long enmity, wastage of time and resources. Sometimes, if any party is politically strong and influential that does black mail to the weak party to prolong the dispute to obtain vote or penalty. 2.7 ASSET VALUATION The Valuation has been made applying approved rates of relevant departments. Valuation survey was undertaken for compensation of different types of losses, such as land, structures, equipment/fixtures (tube wells etc.) trees and crops. Actual valuation for the specific affected land was determined by the District Price Assessment Committees (DPACs) Jhelum[Rana1][Rana2]& Khushaband valuation of affected structures was applied and approved by the District Buildings Department, Jhelum.The approved Rates are provided in the Annexure-III. 2.7.1 Valuation of Land The DPAC of area (Main canal & Distys) falling in Tehsil PD Khan was held on 28 Feb.2019 and the rates for Main Canal and Disty was approved. The DPAC for the land of FCCs 1 to 13 fall in Tehsil Pind Daden Khan also approved the land rates on 30-4-2019. While the DPAC of Khushab area including Main Canal, Distys and FCCs wasagain held on 21-9-2019 and approved the land price to be acquired for the project. The rates are applied for the Main Canal/disys and FCCs for land compensation to the DPs. The compensation of 3840 acres of private alnd comes out Rs.1075.75 Million provided in the Annexure-II against each DP and also included in the budget of chapter 7. The copies of these Notification are provided in the Annexure- XX. The committee took into account several considerations in ascertaining the value of the land: i) Prevailing market price of the land based on local knowledge by patwaris and

information from property dealers, and ii) Average sale price of preceding one year from the date of publication of Notification

under section 4 of the land acquisition Act. 1894, taking into account the specific situation in the different tehsils .

2.7.2 Valuation of Structures Assessment of structures was made in consultation with the community. Finally, the District Buildings Department Rates, Jhelum were considered in developing the unit rates for valuation of affected structures,Table 2.19 below. The approved unit rates from concerned department are provided in Annexure- III.



Table 2.19:Unit Rates for Valuation of Structures of P3

Sr. No.

Description Unit Type of Construction Rate (Rs.)

A- Private Owned Structures

1 Residential Sq. ft Pacca Semi-Pacca

830 662

2 Cattle Shed, Shed Sq. ft Pacca Semi Pacca

830 662

3 Boundary Wall (B.W) Running ft (5 ft. high &

1 ft. length) Pacca

170

5 Tube well bore Number Single Bore/Drilling

40000

6

Water Pipes for Irrigation -from 6-8 inch dia

Per running foot

Plasitc Cemented

Rs.117-260 Rs.92-230

9 Private Trees Number Average cost of fuel timber adult tree(20 mond, Rs.300/mond

6000

B- Public Structures

11 Electric Cemented Pole Shifting Cost

Per pole Electric Pole Shifting Cost 30000

Source: District Buildings Department, Jhelum and local market rates, 2018-2019.

2.7.3 Valuation of Crops

It was observed that wheat in the rabi and fodder& rice (in some area) in thekharif season was the cropping pattern. Based on socio-economic/agro-economic survey and analysis of the data, the crop compensation have been provided to the DPs on average crop production and net income of the crop per acre.The compensation rateshave been provided in the Annexure-XXI according to the local agricultural commodity market, Pind Daden Khan. Due to the same crop year of 2018-2019, the net income remained same as Rs.32,000 per acre in Rabi season, whereas, for Kharif crop season, it was analyzed that Rs.22500 per acre. Average net income per kanal was Rs.6813. The crop compensation cost of 600 kanals comes out Rs. 4.09 Million provided in the budget.The details are given in Table 2.6. It is worth to mention that during the past year, due to business slump, the land rate and land rent is reduced. Similarly, though the price of commodity is slightly increased but the price of input and pesticides also increased resulting futile situation and net income per acre remained the same. Livestock rearing was a major source of livelihood for the local community of the Project area. In this regards, kharif fodder was almost used for their animals. 2.7.4 Valuation of Private Trees About 1995 (1039 matured and 956 sapling trees) privately owned trees belonged to 172 DPs have been identified under project impact fall in the RoW. Non of the trres are suitable for furnitures and can be used only for fuel.The compensation for the affected trees will be paid to the DPs on market value which is based on the average weight of the tree close to local market price. A tree is observed having the weight of 20 monds (800 kg). The local rate of fuel timber/wood was Rs.300 per mond (40 kg), amounting total compensation cost per tree will be Rs.6000. The mature tree is compensated at Rs.6000, while sapling tree is compensated at Rs.3000.The owner is allowed to take/use tree wood as salvage material.The details have been provided in Annexure-IV. The local fuel timber rate is the same as it was in the last year. Because there is abundance of natural wild bushes in the



area, grow automatically every year without any effort and cost.The compensation cost of Rs.9.10 million has beeb provided in the budget.

2.7.5 Valuation of Fruit Trees

As far as fruit trees are concerned,during trees counting survey, no fruit trees were recorded under project impacts. The main reason was that a vast area is lying without cultivation due to brackish water and not fit for tree plantation except local and wild plants etc.

2.7.6 Valuation of Govt. Owned Trees

Under thev ROW of Main Canal, Distys and FCCs falling ICB-P3, 63 Govt. owned trees (58 matured and 5 sapling) were recorded at various locations and compensation made as per approved rates of Forest, Wildlife & Fisheries, Lahore dated 14 July 2017, Government of the Punjab. 10 new plants/trees against one uprooted tree accounting total 630 trees will be replanted. According to Notification, the compensation of 630 trees has been calculated as below:

No.of Tree Avenue Mile Cost (Rs.) as per Abstract of Forest deptt.

Remarks

500 1 157535 Included all expenses of 5 years

630 1.26 198494 same

The cost of replantation of 630 trees comes out Rs.198494 that is allocated in the budget.The copy of Notification and rates are provided in the Annexure-XIX. The PMO (Canals) will coordinate with the relevant department to sort out its removal and method of compensation. The locations of these trees and compensation cost is provided in the Annexure-VI while the compensation cost of Rs.198494 is also allocated in the budget (Chapter 7).



3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK, POLICY AND ENTITLEMENTS 3.1 GENERAL The legal framework of Pakistan which applies to land acquisition and compensation is discussed in this section together with the relevant Asian Development Bank Policies and describes the land acquisition process. 3.2 NATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS

3.2.1 Constitution of the Republic of Pakistan (1973) The Constitution of Pakistan (1973) clearly addresses the protection of property rights (Article 24) it includes “no person shall be compulsorily deprived of his property save in accordance with law” and “no property shall be compulsorily acquired or taken possession of save for a public purpose, and save by the authority of law which provides for compensation” therefore and either fixes the amount of compensation or specifies the principles on and the manner in which compensation is to be determined and given. Further, Article 4 (sub-clause/a of 1) reiterates the legislative right of the people by stating that: “No action detrimental to the life, liberty, body, reputation or property of any person shall be taken except in accordance with law”. 3.2.2 Land Acquisition Act (1894) In the absence of a specific resettlement policy, the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894 is the de-facto legal instrument governing resettlement and compensation to DPs. However, it does not provide for the Project to give due consideration to social, cultural, economic, and environmental conditions associated with resettlement. Although LAA lays down detailed procedures for acquisition of private properties for public purposes and compensation, but it does not extend to resettlement and rehabilitation of persons as required by donor agencies including the Asian Development Bank. Further, experience in other projects has established that compensation stipulated in the law may not be adequate to provide for equal or enhanced living status to resettled DPs. In this project, huge quantity of private land is being acquired as per LAA 1894. 3.2.3 Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement The LAA 1894 regulates the land acquisition process and enables the provincial government to acquire private land for public purposes. Land acquisition is a provincial responsibility and provinces have also their own province specific implementation rules like Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983. The procedure for acquiring land both by Government for public purposes and for company is described in the Land Acquisition Act. The salient features of major sections of the Act are given in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1: Salient Features of Pakistan’s LAA 1894

Key Sections

Salient Features

Section 4 Publication of preliminary notification and power for conducting survey.

Section 5 Formal notification of land needed for a public purpose. Section 5a covering the need for enquiry of the concerns or grievances of the affected people related to land prices.

Section 5-A Hearing of objection. Thirty days after the issue of the notification.

Section 6 The Government makes a more formal declaration of intent to acquire land.



Key Sections

Salient Features

Section 7 The Commissioner directs the Collector to take order for the acquisition of the land.

Section 8 The LAC directs the land acquired to be physically marked out, measured and planned.

Section 9 The LAC gives notice to all DPs that the Government intends to take possession of the land and if they have any claims for compensation then these claims are to be made to him at an appointed time.

Section 10 The LAC records statements of the DPs in the area of land to be acquired or any part thereof as co-proprietor, sub-proprietor, mortgage, and tenant or otherwise.

Section 11 The LAC makes enquiries into the measurements, value and claim and issues the final “award”. The award includes the land‟s marked area and the valuation of compensation.

Section 12 LAC gives notice of final award to persons interested in the acquired land.

Section 16 When award is made, LAC takes possession and the land shall thereupon vest absolutely in the Government, free from all encumbrances.

Section 17 Special power in case of emergency to take possession of any land needed for public purposes or for a company.

Section 18 In case of dissatisfaction with the award, allows DPs to request the LAC to refer the case onward to the court for a decision. This does not affect the Government taking possession of land.

Section 23 Relates to matters to be considered in determining compensation including i) market value of land, ii) loss of standing crops, trees and structures, iii) any damage sustained at the time of possession, iv) injurious affect to other property (moveable or immoveable) or earnings, v) expenses incidental to compelled relocation of the residence or business and vi) diminution of the profits between the time of publication of Section 6 and the time of taking possession plus 15 percent premium in view of the compulsory nature of the acquisition for public purposes.

Section 28 Collector may be desired to pay interest on excess compensation.Relates to the determination of compensation values and interest premium for land acquisition.

Section 31 Allows the LAC to grant to persons having limited interest on the acquired land other lands in exchange.

Section 48 Completion of acquisition not compulsory, but compensation to be awarded when not completed. If within a period of one year from the date of publication of declaration under section 6 in respect of any land, the Collector has not made an award under section 11 in respect to such land, the owner of the land shall, unless he has been to a material extent responsible for the delay be entitled to receive compensation for the damage suffered by him in consequence of the delay.

3.2.4 ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement The Safeguard Policy Statement, SPS 2009 is based on the following objectives;

to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible;

to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives;

to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and

to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups.

The following principles are applied to achieve these objectives:

i. Screen the project early on to identify past, present and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks;

ii. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of

displaced persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks;



iii. Carry out meaningful consultations with affected persons, host communities, and

concerned non-government organizations. Inform all displaced persons of their entitlements and resettlement options. Ensure their participation in planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation of resettlement programs. Pay particular attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the displaced person‟s concerns. Support the social and cultural institutions of displaced persons and their host population. Where involuntary resettlement impacts and risks are highly complex and sensitive, compensation and resettlement decisions should be preceded by a social preparation phase.

iv. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons through (i)

land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land-based where possible, or cash compensation at replacement costs for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

v. Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed

assistance, including (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.

vi. Improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups,

including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas, provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources; in urban areas, provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.

vii. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land

acquisition is through negotiated settlement to ensure that those people who enter into negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better income and livelihood status as was before the project.

viii. Ensure that displaced persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal

rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.

ix. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on displaced persons‟ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

x. Disclose a draft resettlement plan or the compensation matrix, eligibility criteria or

rates determined for the affected land, structures, trees etc., including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an accessible place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons



and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders.

xi. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project‟s costs and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation.

xii. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical

or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.

xiii. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of

living of displaced persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring.

xiv. Disclose monitoring reports 3.2.5 Comparison of Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act 1894, and ADB SPS-2009 and

Measures to Address the Gap. In principle, Pakistan‟s Law and ADB policy adhere not only to the objective of compensation for affected families, but also the objective of rehabilitation. However, Pakistan‟s law is unclear on how rehabilitation is to be achieved and in practice the provision of rehabilitation is left to ad hoc arrangements taken by the local governments and specific project proponents. The Act does not require preparation of a “plan” documenting the process, structure and consultations undertaken with DPs, valuation and project specific grievance redress mechanism. Other gaps include requirement to compensate and assist DPs without legal rights to land, attention to vulnerable groups, indigenous people and severely affected DPs, importance given to gender issues, monitoring of resettlement implementation, and disclosure of resettlement plans and monitoring reports. In case of emergency acquisition under the LAA, people may be displaced prior to being compensated and assisted. To clarify these issues and reconcile eventual gaps between Pakistan‟s Law and ADB Policy, proposed these measures for the project, ensuring compensation at replacement cost of all items, the rehabilitation of informal settlers and the provision of subsidies or allowances for DPs that may be relocated, suffer business losses or may be severely affected. Difference between Pakistan‟s Law, ADB Policy and measures to address the differences or gaps are outlined in Table: 3.2:

Table 3.2: Difference between Pakistan’s Law, ADB Policy and Measures to Address the Differences or Gaps

Pakistan LAA 1894 ADB SPS 2009 Measures to Address the Gap in the

Project

Compensation for land and other assets is based on average values and department unit rates that do not ensure replacement market value of the property acquired. However, LAA requires that a 15percent compulsory acquisition surcharge supplement the assessed compensation.

DPs are to be compensated for all their losses at replacement cost, including transaction cost and other related expenses, without deducting for depreciation.

Land valuation is to be based on current replacement (market) value with an additional payment of 15percent. The valuation for the acquired housing land and other assets is the full replacement costs keeping in view the fair market values, transaction costs and other applicable payments that may be required.

No provision for resettlement Requires support for Provision will be made to pay for



Pakistan LAA 1894 ADB SPS 2009 Measures to Address the Gap in the

Project

expenses, income/livelihood rehabilitation measures or allowances for displaced poor and vulnerable groups.

rehabilitation of income and livelihood, severe losses, and for vulnerable groups.

resettlement expenses (transportation and transitional allowances), compensate for loss of income, and provide support to vulnerable persons and those severely impacted (considered to be those losing 10percent or more of their productive assets).

Squatters and informal tenants/leaseholders are not entitled to compensation for loss of structures, crops

Lack of formal title is not a bar to compensation and rehabilitation. All DPs, including non-titled DPs, are eligible for compensation of all non-land assets if they occupied the land or structures in the project area prior to the cutoff date for eligibility for resettlement assistance.

Squatters, informal tenants/leaseholders are entitled to compensation for loss of structures and livelihood and for relocation. If they occupied the land or structures in the project area prior to the cutoff date for eligibility for resettlement assistance.

Has no specific requirement for the preparation of a LARP

Requires the preparation of a LARP based on social impact assessment and consultation with DPs elaborating on displaced persons‟ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

Final LARP for ICB-P3 has been prepared based on detailed design and condition for awarding civil works contract.

No convenient grievance redress mechanism except recourse of appeal to formal administrative jurisdiction or the court of law

Requires the establishment of accessible grievance redress mechanisms to receive and facilitate the resolution of DPs‟ concerns about displacement and other impacts, including compensation

Will establish easily accessible grievance redress mechanism available throughout project implementation that will be widely publicized within respective project area and amongst the DPs.

There is no requirement for monitoring resettlement implementation and disclosure of resettlement plans and monitoring reports

Requires that LARP implementation is monitored and LARP and monitoring reports are disclosed in an accessible place and a form and language(s) understandable to DPs and other stakeholders.

LARP implementation will be monitored both internally and externally. The draft and final LARP, and monitoring reports will be disclosed to DPs, posted in the project website and ADB website for general public disclosure.

Has an emergency provision that allows civil works to proceed before compensation is paid.

Requires that DPs are compensated and provided other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement.

Civil works may only proceed after the LARP is implemented and compensation for loss of assets and other allowances are fully paid.



3.3 ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENTS 3.3.1 Eligibility

Cut-off date: The eligibility for compensation will be limited to the BOR‟s announced cut-off date for each section that involves LAR impacts. The cut-off date as 31-3-2019was fixed and announced to prevent influx of outsiders and to avoid false and frivolous claims for compensation, relocation and livelihood rehabilitation entitlements. Any person who enters in the project land after the announced cut of date or any assets established in corridor of impact after cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation however, the affected persons will be served a prior notice to remove their assets and take the salvage free of cost.

In case of acquisition of land and land based assets under LAA provisions, the cut-off date will be the day when formal declaration of land acquisition under Section-6of LAA is notified and published in the official gazette. While for sections within the existing government-owned land and ROW, the start date for the census survey of DPs for the final LARP preparation was fixed as cut-off date and was announced and publicized by the PMO- Canals. However, the efforts were ensured that the land acquisition process and impact assessment and census for LARP preparation is streamlined to coincide with the cut-off date under LAA provisions and for LARP preparation. Each DP was documented through questionnaire filling ( socio-economic and resettlement survey) and issued identification as to confirm his/her presence on the proposed site/alignment of the project prior to the cut-off date and to avoid false and frivolous claims at the time of LARP implementation. The cut-off date was disclosed to the DPs through consultative meetings, focus group discussions, field surveys and other means of communication including face-to-face communication with communities in close coordination with the heads of the villages. The disclosure of cut-off date has been formalized through documentation of consultation meetings and disclosure reports. DPs are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. The persons holding or occupying the land/assets at the subproject site on or before the cut-off date and who face physical or economic displacement due to permanent or temporary loss of their assets including land, structures and other assets appended to the land or their livelihood whether full or partial as a consequence of land acquisition or eviction from public land (ROW) were entitled for compensation and rehabilitation/income restoration provisions under the provisions of this LARP. DPs may include (i) persons or legal entities with formal legal rights to acquired land and/or structures in entirety or in part, (ii) persons who have no formal legal rights to land and/or structures lost wholly or in part but who have claims to such lands that are recognized or recognizable under national law, and (iii) persons who lost the land or structure they occupy in entirety or in part who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land. The eligible DPs entitled for compensation under this LARP may include but not limited to the categories defined below:

Owners of land and assets i.e. structures (residential/commercial or of any other use) with formal legal title to land and the recorded occupiers/users of land/assets as provided in the land record registers and cadasters etc.;

DPs whose rights are not formal or legal but whose claims are recognized or



recognizable under national laws or customs will be eligible for compensation against their affected land/assets. Such DPs may include people who have customary usufruct right to the land that is held either by the community (collectively) or the state or people who have inherited, occupied, and utilized the land for generations but lack titles simply because the state has not formalized the land records and issued title to them.

DPs without formal legal rights or recognizable claims under national law and customs and may include all squatters, tenants, sharecroppers, and wage laborers. Although such DPs lack legal or recognizable rights to the land/asset but because of lost assets or impacted livelihoods they will be considered DPs eligible to receive compensation for assets other than land and resettlement assistance.

Cultivators or those whose livelihood is dependent on acquired land, business operators of affected commercial structures and their employees whether registered under law or informal and the identified vulnerable groups.

3.3.2 Entitlements The proposed criteria of Entitlement Matrix is prepared that will be implemented according to compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with Pakistan‟s Law/regulation, ADB Safeguard Statement Policy (SPS-2009) and measures. Keeping in view the possible project impacts, the following compensation and other assistance/allowances would be permissible to the DPs as provided in Table.3.3.

Replacement cost of the affected structure/asset/property etc., Self-Relocation Allowance;(not applicable in LARP,ICB-P3). Shifting/Transportation Allowance; Livelihood Allowance; not applicable;(not applicable in LARP,ICB-P3). Vulnerability; Women headed Household Allowance; ;(not applicable in LARP,ICB-P3). Agriculture Rehabilitation/Production Allowance; Business/Commercial Loss.

Table 3.3: Entitlement Matrix for Compensation

Asset Specification Eligible Persons Compensation Entitlements

Impacts on Crops on Land to be acquired

All type of affected crops

All users with or without title or registration

Crop compensation for each crop lost during Kharif/Rabi agriculture season based on provincial agriculture department.

Agricultural Land, including uncultivable waste land (permanent impact)

All land fall under project impact

Farmer/ Titleholder Cash compensation at replacement cost plus 15 percent Compulsory Acquisition Surcharge (CAS) free of taxes, registration and transfer costs; or

Land for land compensation through provision of plots of equal value and productivity as determined by the District Revenue Department/BOR, Govt. of Punjab)

Lessee (registered or not) Cash compensation equivalent to market value of gross harvest crop of the affected land for the remaining lease years, up to maximum of three years.




Sharecropper/ Tenant (registered or not)

Cash compensation equal to the market value of gross annual crop yield of lost land, proportionate to their share for two years.

Agriculture Workers (registered or not)

Cash indemnity corresponding to their salary for the remaining part of the agriculture season up to maximum three months.

Squatters/ Informal Setters

No compensation for lost land. One rehabilitation allowance equal to

market value of the gross annual yield of lost land in addition to standard crop compensation.

Additional provision for DPs losing more than 10 percent their total operational agricultural holding.

Farmer/ Titleholder tenant/ Leaseholder

Severe agricultural land impact allowance equal to the market value of the gross annual yield of lost land for one year.

Sharecropper (registered or not)

One severe impact allowance equal to value of share of harvest lost (Additional to standard crop compensation)

Agriculture Workers (registered or not)

Agriculture workers, whose contracts will be interrupted, will receive an indemnity corresponding to three months of income.

Squatters/Informal Settlers

One rehabilitation allowance equal to value of one gross harvest (In addition to crop compensation)

Temporary impact on arable land

Land required temporarily during civil works

All eligible persons, as above (with and without title)

Compensation taking into an account forgone income and mutually agreed rental rate for temporary use and reclaimation of land to original use.

Residential/ Commercial Land

Land required during civil works

Owner (legal/ legalizable)

Cash compensation at replacement cost plus 15 percent compulsory acquisition surcharge (CAS) free of taxes, registration and transfer costs;

Renter/Leaseholder Cash compensation of a value proportionate to the duration of the remaining lease period.

Non-titled user (Squatters, encroachers)

No compensation of lost land

Non-titled owners (squatters) occupying land for dwelling identified by the census (only those actually occupying the land) Non-titled owners (squatters) occupying land for shops/stalls/kiosks identified by the census and inventory of lost

Self-relocation allowance (equivalent to one year‟s income calculated at the prevailing official monthly minimum wage)

Option to set up a stall through a space rental agreement with respective local governments or authority at a designated commercial area in public land and at a location comparable to the lost location.




assets (only those actually occupying the facilities)

Govt. Employees living in govt. Residence

Only Govt. employee

Formal Settler Accommodation in government area, in other Govt. colony or 03 months‟ rent to pay of private house.

Residential Structures

All Affected Persons

Owner(s), titled and non-titled of the structures.

Cash Compensation at replacement cost for affected structures by type of construction.

In case of partial impacts where viability of structure is not affected, cash assistance compensation for the damaged material and restoration of the structure.

A lump sum transportation allowance will be paid to relocating households,

The replacement value approved by the buildings department Jhelum will be applied and annexed.

Apart from above, relocation allowance of 12 months based on minimum wage rate that is Rs.17500 per month (OPL) will be paid.

Commercial, agricultural and community structures

All Affected Persons

Owner(s), titled and non-titled of the structures and squatter(in case of squatters only those actually occupying the structures and incase of community structures, the members of the committee jointly)

Cash Compensation at replacement cost for affected structures by type of construction and other fixed assets.

In case of partial impacts where viability of structure is not affected, cash assistance compensation for the damaged material and restoration of the structure based on approved rates of the Buildings Department, Jhelum.

Salvaged materials will be free of deductions.

A lump sum transportation allowance will be paid to relocating households, businesses, agricultural operations and mosques etc. for shifting their belongings, inventory, equipment and installations.

The replacement value approved by the buildings department Jhelum will be applied and annexed.

Boundary wall, Floor etc

All affected persons

All relevant DPs (including informal settlers)

For Pacca Rs.170/sq.ft.for Semi Pacca Rs.150/sq.ft.and for Kacha structure, Rs.120/sq.ft. Boundary wall will be calculated length x 5-6 ft. height.

Moveable structure/sitting on the ground

Kiosk, cobblers, hair cutter etc

Formal/informal owners of structures

No compensation for moveable structure.

No compensation will be provided to the DPs sitting on the ground like




cobbler, hair cutter etc. as they can move near by the existing place without disturbance of their income.

Trees

All affected trees

Owner Fruit trees: compensation for mature fruit- bearing trees will comprise of the market rate of the yearly crop yield multiplied by the number of years required to grow such tree to the same productive level it was cut; and for immature trees that are yet to bear fruit compensation will be based on the gross expense needed to reproduce the tree to the same age it was cut and include the cost of saplings.

Timber trees will be valued based on the market value of their dry wood weight. The wood of the fallen tree will remain with the owner and its value will not be deducted from the compensation.

Govt.owned trees will be treated as per FW&F deptt. Govt.of Punjab.

Loss of business and employment

Shops, stalls and kiosks

Business owners; (including, renters and informal settlers and squatters) and employees identified by the census.

Cash grant for net income loss for duration of business stoppage (six months for permanent loss and no more than three months for temporary stoppage). One time cash grant will be paid to affected employeesequivalent to 2 months of their formal wages, if not available based on official monthly minimum wage.

Shifting allowance

Shifting of impacted material etc

All DPs affected by the project who need to shift residential or other structures

Rs.10000 per household as shifting allowance.

In case of huge building/ factory, it may be increased up to Rs.30, 000.

Loss of livelihood (Relocation)

Residential structures affected

Head of displaced household losing residential structures

All suchDPs allowing 6 months to move will be awarded 6 OPL as transition allowance.

Affected Vulnerable Households

Poor and female-headed Households and other Vulnerable households, Including the elderly, identified through the SIA.

Head of the household Lump sum assistance allowance in cash equal to 3 OPL. Temporary or permanent employment during construction or operation of the facility that necessitated involuntary resettlement, where feasible.

In case of DP expires

Any structure

Headed of household The next eligible DP will be his wife to get compensation.

No need to provide court succession




letter, only death certificate verified by the affected persons committee will be provided.

In case the DP was only person expires and no other family member recorded during the census survey, no other person will be entitled and compensation will be cancelled.

Unidentified Losses

Unanticipated impacts

All DPs Deal with as appropriate during project implementation according to the ADB Safeguard Policy.

* OPL. Official Poverty Line as declared minimum wage by the Government (2018-2019).



4. CONSULTATIONS, PARTICIPATION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

4.1 BACKGROUND Public consultation and community involvement is one of the key regulatory tools employed to improve transparency, efficiency and effectiveness of regulations for a development project. It involves actively seeking the opinions of those interested or affected by a project. It is a two way flow of information, which may occur at any stage of development from project identification through planning, design, construction and operation. It may be a process or a continuing dialogue between project implementation authority and the affectees. Consultations are increasingly concerned with the objective of gathering information and find the acceptable solution. For new project like Jalalpur Irrigation Project, social contact with the local community and public consultation will not be a single conversation but a series of discussions to create understanding about the project. Due to final design, open Consultation sessions were held with different stakeholder groups, who were affected by the project. The Consultation process was carried out in accordance with the Asian Development Bank Policy on public consultation. The purpose of Consultation process was to carry out and assemble feedback from participants. 4.2 OBJECTIVES Participation mechanisms facilitate the consultative process and include: information sharing and dissemination; disclosure; and participation of all stakeholders of the project related activities so that their views and concerns shall be addressed properly and ensure them that they are actual beneficiaries of the project. It is of basic importance to involve DPs/representatives of local communities‟ right from the start. The institutional arrangements should also be in place for continuous consultation throughout the process of planning to implementation of the project. During the field survey, Consultations and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were arranged and conducted keeping in view their concerns and problems. The consultations were carried out by a full-fledged team of Sociologists in the month of February to May 2019. The purposes of the meetings with stakeholders were to:

Inform the DPs and farmers losing their lands about the objectives of the project and the scope of work involved in the execution of the project;

Provide a forum for the initial feedback of critical social issues;

Discussion over impacts on land and structures and compensation procedure;

Sharing with the local communities the mitigation measures included in the project design to address the potential impacts;

Ascertaining the pressing needs of the local communities to be addressed;

Promoting good will towards the project among the DPs and the communities;

Begin establishing communication and an evolving mechanism for resolution of social and environmental problems,and

Inform Cut-Off Date (31-3-2019) for eligibility of entitlements. 4.3 IDENTIFICATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS Stakeholder analysis/identification is a way of determining who among stakeholders can have the most positive or negative impacts, who is likely to be most affected by the project. The Stakeholders are people, groups, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working in



the area on the same nature of projects, Community Based Organization (CBOs), or institutions that may be affected by, can significantly influence, or are important to the achievement of the stated purpose of a proposed intervention. Generally, stakeholders can be classified into three groups: 4.3.1 Primary Stakeholders Primary stakeholders are those who directly related, either positively or negatively, by an effort or the actions of an agency, institution, or organization. In case of ICB-P3 Jalalpur Irrigation Project, the Primary Stakeholders may include;

Potential DPs were the landowners and owners of different structures whose land and structures are falling in the RoW of the proposed channels of ICB-P3

The general population/residents including institutions, Government departments, NGOs or CBOs were consulted within primary impact zone, who may subject to direct or indirect impact on their residences or access to their workplaces during the construction period, or by any kind of project action, or who may have personal interests or concern with the project.

Farmers in the command area of ICB-P3 of Jalalpur Irrigation Project which were potentially impacted by this project, positively in the long term through supply of the canal water and functionality of the canal, and also, potentially, may be negatively due to the minor risk of disruption during construction of the canal.

4.3.2 Secondary Stakeholders Secondary stakeholders are people or groups that are indirectly affected, either positively or negatively, by the project or the actions of an agency, institution, or organization. During the survey, apart from the DPs, many other stakeholders and residents of the area raised their concerns, which were addressed and made them satisfied. 4.3.3 Key Persons Apart from the DPs, the key stakeholders in case of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3 were political leaders, influential community members and other local representatives including imams, Numberdars and teachers of local schools. All type of these stakeholders had also participated in the general discussion on the project. 4.4 CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS In order to get spontaneous responses, scoping sessions in the project were held to extract qualitative information about the perception and apprehensions about the project. The views of the farmers were formally recorded and effort was made to make those beneficial for the Project. Farmers of the command area of Jalalpur Irrigation Project which may potentially impacted by this project, positively in the long term through supply of the canal water and functionality of the canal, and also, potentially, may be negatively due to the minor risk of disruption during construction of the canal. The Consultations were carried out by a full-fledged team of Sociologists in the months of February- May 2019. Eight consultations and two Focus Group Discussions were conducted at different 10locations have been provided in the Table 4.1,while during socio-economic interviews,1052 DPs of 38villages were consulted.



Apart from this, 12 DPs losing structures/fixtures were also consulted belonged to 4 villages (Annexure-I. The details of Consultations and Focus Group Discussion are provided in the Table 4.2 and scanned copies of these Consultations and Focus Group Discussions are provided in Annexure-XIV & XV.

Table 4.1: Consultations/ Focus Group Discussions with the Participants of P3

Sr. Mouza/Village Location/RD Number of Participants Consultation

1 Kurar Disty-22 & 23 57

2 Jaswal Disty-20 34

3 Rajsar Disty-18 16

4 Kandwal MC+Disty-18 & 19 43

5 Daiwal MC+Disty18 23

6 Tobha Main Canal 18

7 Nari Shumali Disty-23 25

8 Thatti Main Canal 18

9 Individual Consultation (Table 4.3) 04 Mouza 12

10 Consultation during Socio-economic interviews

Various Locations 1052

Total 1298 Focus Group Discussions

1 Malyar Disty-15 12

2 Mangwal Main Canal 28 Total 30

Total Participants

4.4.1 Consultation with Stakeholders In the Project area, consultations were held with the people whose structures fall in the RoW and will be demolished to clear the canal alignment before mobilizing the contractor. Land owners whose land will be acquired for the construction of new canal, distribution system and FCCs were also consulted during these sessions. These consultations held at different locations along the alignment of the proposed channels. All participants were briefed about the importance of the project and the resettlement policy of the ADB. The compensation eligibility and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) were explained in detail. They were also explained about the efforts made to minimize the adverse impacts of the project. During the consultation, it was assessed that mostly people were aware about the project, its benefits and adverse impacts. During discussions, participants have shown keen interest in discussion, gave valuable suggestions and also raised various questions. The local people expressed their willingness and cooperation with the project staff during survey and implementation of the project as most of the land is barren and the owners are hopeful that their barren lands will become fertile and under cultivation. The villages and number of participants of consultations, question raised and response given are provided in Table 4.2. The original documents of Focus Group Discussions and Community Consultations are scanned and provided in Annexures-XIV & XV respectively, while sample form for consultation and focus group discussion is provided in the Appendix-IV.



Table 4.2: Consultation Meetings with Participants of ICB-P3

Case No.

Date Venue Name

1

15-01-19

Mouza Kurar Disty-22 & 23

Allah Diitta s/o Sher Muhammad

Shaukat Hussain s/o Saeed Muhammad

Hussain bukhsh s/o Bhai Khan

Ghulam Hussain s/o Ghulam Muhammad

Sahab Khan s/o Sanwal Khan

Sarfraz s/o Ghulam Haider

M.Ramzan s/o Allah Ditta

Sarfraz Hussain s/o Ghaus Muhammad

Hussain Bux s/o Allah Ditta

M.Yousaf s/o Sultan Bukhsh

Sher Muhammad s/o Dost Muhammad

M.Ramzan s/o Sher Muhammad

Muzaffar Khan s/o Bhai Khan

Dost Muhammad s/o Noor Khan

M.Nawaz s/o Gul Muhammad

Ghulam Abbass s/o Khan Muhammad

Abdul Aziz s/o Altaf Hussain

M.Asif s/o Manzoor Hussain

Ghulam Jafar s/o Shah Wali

M.Bashir s/o Mehdi Khan

Ghulam Mohd s/o Fateh Ali

Sami-ul- Hassan s/o Shafiq-ul-Hassan

Mohd Safeer s/o Bhai Khan

Amir Sohail s/o Muhammad Hussain

Ghulam Qamar s/o Sultan

Haq Nawaz s/o Muzaffar Khan

M.Farooq s/o Abdul Khaliq

Haq Nawaz s/o Jeewan Khan

M.Nawaz s/o Wali Muhammad

Saleh Mohd s/o Sher Muhammad

Shah Mohd s/o Ata Muhammad

Haq Nawaz s/o M.Hayat

M.Yaqoob s/o M.Jafar

Abdul Haseeb s/o Raja Zafar Hussain

Sher Muhammad s/o Khan Mohd

Hasan Shehzad s/o Akhter Nawaz

Mian Mohd s/o Mehdi Khan

Nazir Ahmad s/o Mian Mohd

Rasheed Ahmad s/o Mian Mohd

Allah Ditta s/o Sher Muhammad

M.Farooq s/o Abdul Khaliq

M.Sabtain s/o Allah Ditta

Hakim Khan s/o M.Sharif

Zahir Hussain s/o Chan Khan

Ramzan s/o Mehdi Khan

M.Nawaz s/o Gul Mohd

Nawaz s/o Sanwal Khan

Allah Ditta s/o Sanwal Khan

M. Mukhtiar s/o Gul Muhammad

Fakhr Abbass s/o Sahib Khan

Zafar Iqbal s/o Mehdi Khan

Ejaz Hussain s/o Dost Muhammad

Muhammad Shah s/o Ahmad Shah

Dost Mohd s/o Mohd Arif



Question Raised Response

We are listning about the project, when construction will start?

Please Change the design of Disty. 22 & 23 to irrigate more area?

How much compensation will be paid of our land to be acquired?

Land acquisition is in the process and will be started in June 2019.

Depending upon NSL, the water flow from the river guides the designer to cover the area. The design is finalized based on land level to irrigate maximum land. The left over area can not be irrigated due to up level from the disty.

The price of the land will be determined by the DC office Jhelum after DPAC valuation according to the categories of land at replacement cost will be made to the affected landowners.

2

25-1-19 Mouza Jaswal Disty.-20

Raja Gulsher Khan s/o Kher Mohd

Raja Ghaus s/o Raja Khan

Ahmad Nawaz s/o Bahadur Khan

Ataullah s/o Mohd Haneef

Mohd Ahsan s/o Mohd Haneef

Amir Shehzad s/o Mohd Munsif

Mohd Akber s/o Ghulam mohd

Mohd Yousaf s/o Mohd Nawaz

Mohd Nawaz s/o Nizam Din

Ghulam Rasool s/o Kher Mohd

Fateh Mohd s/o Ata Mohd

Mohd Nawaz s/o Noor mohd

Mohd Azam s/o Ghulam Rasool

Mohd Jahangir s/o Nadir Khan

Ghulam Murtaza s/o Mohd Ishaq

Asad Iqbal s/o Ghulam Mehdi

Mohd Mumtaz s/o Mohd Riaz

Mohd Zahoor s/o Noor Mohd

Waqar Ahmad s/o Gulzar Ahmad

Fakher Iqbal s/o Mohd Sadiq

Ghulam Hussain s/o Mohd Boota

Mohd Anser s/o Sher Mohd

Mohd Fiaz s/o Mohd Nawaz

Waseem Haider s/o Noor Mohd

Sahib Khan s/o Fateh Mohd

Mohd Zeeshan s/o Mohd Ramzan

Mohd Sarfraz

Zafar Iqbal s/o Abdul Sattar

Dost Mohd s/o Mohd Khan

Mohd Lateef s/o Ghulam Jafar

Mohd Yaseen s/o Fateh Mohd

Zafar Iqbal s/o Ghulam Mohd

Mohd Ehsan s/o Fateh Mohd

Shamshad Hussain s/o Mumtaz Khan

Case No.

Date Venue Name

3 18-4-2019 Mouza Rajsar Disty-18

Ghulam Rasool

Mohd Mehmood

Mohd Hayat

Mohd Munir

Mohd Rafique

Mohd Yousaf

Mohd Khan



Mohd Shakeel

Mohd Mumtaz

Allah Rakhha

Mohd Afzal

Mohd Ansar

Mohd Aslam

Ghulam Qadir

Maqbool Ahmad

Mohd Arshed Question Raised Response

Govt. should provide educational facitities in the area?

What is the land rate is fixed for compensation?

There is need of sweet water supply for the community. Is there any scheme with in this project?

A budget is allocated for the repair and maintenance of schools. Data of 45 schools has been collected for this purpose.

Land rate is being determined by the Revenue department keeping in view the type of soil.

There is plan to construct ponds to store canal water to recharge the existing water supply tube wells and also for livestock purpose.

Case No.

Date Venue Name

4

2-5-19

Mouza Kandwal Disty-18 & 19 and Main Canal

Zulfqar Ali s/o Muhabbat Khan

M.Aslam s/o Sarfraz Khan

Azhar Abbass s/o Nazar Hussain

M.Farooq s/o Adalat Khan

M.Riaz s/o Allah Bukhsh

Resham Khan s/o Alam Sher

Nisar Khan s/o Resham Khan

Ghulam Hussain s/o Fateh Ali

M.khan s/o Alam Sher

M.Aslam s/o Fateh Mohd

M.Ilyas s/o Ghulam Hussain

Ghazanfer Malik Vice Chairman UC 22

Khyzer Hayat s/o Mohd Haneef

Mumtaz Hussain s/o Mian Khan

M.Yasrab s/o M.Ehsan

Ghaus M s/o Mohd Afzal

Nadir Khan s/o Ghulam Sher

Rustam Khan s/o Sardar Khan

Sher Bahadur s/o Malik Khan

M. Fayyaz s/o M. Nawaz

Baz Khan s/o Muhabbat Khan

Munawar Abbass s/o Muhabbat Khan

M.Raees s/o Ghulam Abbass

Farman Abbass

M.Imran

M.Nawaz s/o Fateh Ali

Ghulam Abid Malik

Allah Bukhsh s/o Mohd Khan

Zameer Hussain s/o Allah Bukhsh

Muhammad .Iqbal s/o Muhammad.Arif

Fazal Abbass s/o Malik Matloob Hussain

Faisal Abbass s/o Matloob Hussain

Mumtraz Hussain s/o Fateh Ali

Jahan Khan s/o Mohd Khan

Malik Iftekhar s/o Nazar Hayat



Mohd Ameer s/o Mubarak Khan

M.Ehsan s/o Alam Sher

Adnan Haider s/o Malik Khan

Nausherwan Haider s/o Malik Khan

Muntazir Haider s/o Ghulam Haider

M.Aslam s/o Anwer Khan

M.Riaz s/o Ali Mohd

M.Aslam s/o Sain Muhammad

Mateen Ahmad Question Raised Response

With the present design, only 10 % area of our village will be irrigated. The route should be shifted on up level to increase the command area under the project.

Is there any lift irrigation scheme to irrigate the up level lands?

What will be the land compensation?

The left over area is on up level and out of reach of the canal water. That area is at high level than Rasul Barrage.In future, it can be irrigated through lift irrigation.

At present NO. May be in future.

The Revenue department of Khushab District has determined the rates based on type of land + 15 % LAS.

Case No.

Date Venue Name

5 15-5-2019 Daiwal Ghulam Haider s/o Fateh Sher

Imdad Hussain s/o Ghulam Habib

Natiq Hussain s/o Mian Mohd

Ghulam Asghar s/o Ghulam Abbass

Khalid Nawaz s/o Haq Nawaz

Sanwal Khan s/o Ali Muhammad

Mohd Khan s/o Shukrana Khan

Sher Afzal s/o Sahib Khan

Noor Mohd s/o Fateh Mohd

M.Ashraf s/o Mohd Afsar

Mohd Khan s/o Ghulam Mohd

Ghulam Rasool s/o M. Mumtaz

Akhter Rasool s/o Mian Khan

Ghulam Mohd s/o Falak Sher

Ata Mohd s/o Haswar Khan

Ghulam Murtaza s/o Ghulam Mohd

Ghulam Qasim s/o Ghulam Hussain

M.Aslam s/o M.Haneef

Sahib Khan s/o Khuda Bukhsh

M.Ashraf s/o Ata Mohd

Shehbaz Khan s/o Feroz Khan

Ghulam Shabbir s/o Ghulam Abbass

Umer Hayat s/o Mohd Afsar Questiona Responses

What is the land price for the Project?.

When construction will start?.

We need water supply from the canal, is it possible

The DC Khushab has conducted a DPAC and finalized the land rates, which are available with your area Patwari or in the revenue office.

Construction will start in your area in Nov-Dec. 2019.

Ponds are proposed in some mouza to recharge the existing water supply schemes or to install new water suppy schemes.



Case No

Date Venue Name

6 26-4-19 Mouza Tobha-MC Haji Suleman s/o Allah Ditta

M.Ramzan s/o Allah Ditta

Dilawar Hussain s/o Mirza Khan

Rasib Khan s/o Said Mohd

Mohd Khan s/o Pir Bukhsh

M. Akram s/o M. Zaman

M.Ashraf s/o M.Aslam

M.Azeem s/o M.Ramzan

M.Boota s/o Sultan

Haji M/Sabir s/o Haji Abdullah Khan

Ghulam Haider s/o Haji Abdulla Khan

M.Riaz s/o Sanwal Khan

Nizam Din s/o Sattar Mohd

Mushtaq Mohd s/o Dost Mohd

Ghulam Murtaza s/o Said Mohd

M.Nawaz s/o Said Mohd

M.Bashir s/o Ali Mohd

Hafiz Mushtaq Ali s/o M.Bashir

Is there any provision of canal supply on right side?

How much is the width of main canal?

Need land for land to be acquired,

The right side is at high level and not possible to reach the water of Rasool Barrage.

Its about 300 ft.

Land for land is not option because there is no State land in the area. Only compensation will be provided along with other incentives/allownaces.

7 17-5-19 Nari Shumal D-23 Mohd Ashraf s/o Dost Muhammad

M.Aslam s/o Dost Mohd

M.Yousaf s/o M.Ameer

M.Yaqoob s/o Mohd Ali

M.Yousaf s/o Mohd Ali

M.Fiaz s/o Mohd Nawaz

Umer Hayat s/o Sher Mohd

M.Arshed s/o Fateh Mohd

Haq Nawaz s/o Mohd Nawaz

Imdad Hussain s/o Zameer Hussain

M.Hayat s/o Ghulam Musatafa

Imdad Hussain s/o Zameer Hussain ( 2nd

man)

Iqbal Hussain s/o M.Hayat

Shahabal Khan s/o Feroz Khan

Afsar Khan s/o Lashari Khan

Dost Mohd s/o Mian Mohd

Ali Akber s/o Pir Shah

Ghulam Jafar s/o Lashkar Khan

Abdur Rehman s/o M.Nawaz

Sanwal Khan s/o Sultan Khan

Mohd Hussain s/o Dost Mohd

Khushi Mohd s/o Sher Mohd

Ghaus Mohd s/o Sanwal Khan

Fateh Mohd s/o Mohd Ali

Lal Khan s/o Ghulam Mohd



Focus Group Discussions

Case No.

Date Venue Name

1 11-4-19

Mouza Malyar Disty-15

Khawaja Bukhsh s/o Haji Bukhsh

Ahmad Mukhtar s/o Ghulam Haider

Mohd Yousaf s/o Imam Din

Mohd Yar s/o Mohd Khan

Mohd Afzal s/o Sardar Khan

Gulzar Hussain

Raees Qadir s/o Ghulam Qadir

Imam Din s/o Mohd Khan

Maqbool Elahi s/o Mohd Yaseen

Mohd Ashraf s/o Shah Wali

Mohd Riaz s/o Dost Muhammad

Mohd Afzal s/o Faiz Ahmad


Which is the route of disty?

What is the land rate to be acquired?

With the help of drawing, they were explained about the disty route.

The Revenue department has determined the land rate along with other allowancea. It will be a fair compensation.

What is total length and ROW of main Canal?

How much land price will be paid to the farmers?

When construction will start and how much its completion period?

Total lengthis 125 KM and about 300 ft is its ROW.

The DC/DPAC Khushab has determined the land rate. The rate is reasonable.

The construcyion will start in your area in Aug-Sep. and 4 years is completion time of each package.

Case No

Date Venue Name

8 26-4-19 Thatti Main Canal Haji Suleman s/o Allah Ditta

Mohd Ramzan s/o Allah Ditta

Dilawar Hussain s/o Mirza Khan

Rasib Khan s/o Said Mohd

Mohd Khan s/o Pir Bukhsh

Mohd Ikram s/o Mohd Zaman

Mohd Ashraf s/o Mohd Aslam

Mohd Azeem s/o Mohd Ramzan

Mohd Boota s/o Sultan

Haji M. Sabir s/o Haji Abdullah Khan

Ghulam Haider s/o Haji Abdullah Khan

Mohd Riaz s/o Sanwal Khan

Nizam Din s/o Sattar Mohd

Mushtaq Mohd s/o Dost Mohd

Ghulam Murtaza s/o Said Mohd

Mohd Nawaz s/o Abdullah Khan

M.Bashir s/o Ali Mohd

Hafiz Mushtaq Ali s/o Mohd Bashir

What is total length and ROW of main Canal?

Is it possible to irrigate lands on right side?

We need water supply scheme for our mouza, is there any provision?

Total lengthis 125 KM and about 250 ft is its ROW.

The right side of MC is at up level, thatis not possible to irrigate the lands on right side.

The project planned storage ponds in the mouza, where fresh water is not availanle.



Case No.

Date Venue Name

When the construction will be started?

Your area fall in package –II, that will start in August 2019.

Case No.

Date Venue Name

2 18-1-19

Mouza Mangwal Main Canal

Malik Faiz Sultan s/o Malik M. Saeed

Sarfraz Awan s/o Abdul Ghafoor Awan

Rafiq s/o Niaz Ahmad

Sher Zaman s/o M.Afzal

Sher Zaman s/o Ahmad Khan

Sajid Iqbal s/o Haji M.Iqbal

Ansar Abbass s/o Nazar Mohd

Hafiz M. Qasim s/o Hafiz M.Iqbal

M. Zulfiqar s/o M.Gulzar

Sher mohd s/o Mehdi Khan

M/asif s/o Gul Jan

Ata Mohd s/o Dost Mohd

Sher Mohd s/o Ghulam Mohd

M.Mumtaz s/o Baz Khan

Muhammad Khan s/o Ahmad Khan

M. Irfan s/o Mohd Khan

Mumtaz s/o Rehmat Khan

M. Pervaiz s/o Ghulam Abbass

Sher Baz s/o Haq Nawaz

Faiz Mohd s/o Dost Mohd

Ghulam Abbass s/o Mureed Hussain

Mohd Khan s/o Mian Khan

Ata Mohd s/o Feroze Khan

Rab Nawaz s/o Sher Mohd

Ghulam Sher s/o Ahmad Khan

Shafqat hussain s/o Mohd Yar

Mohd Aslam s/o Imam Kham

Sajid Nawaz s/o Rab Nawaz


With the present design, our land are not coming under irrigation except a small area, design should be changed so that more area at right side could be irrigated?

Is there plan of lift irrigation?

What is the cut-off date?

Project design has been finalized and efforts were made to irrigate maximum area. The area situated at up side can not be irrigated.

Not yet plan. .

Cut-off-date was told that after completion of resettlement survey, the cut-off-date will be announced.

4.4.2 Individual Consultation In ICB-P3, DPs losing structures were 12, all DPs were consulted and explained about the canal design and impact on their structures, particularly on residential structures. They were



briefed about the procedure of relocation and compensation payments. The Project objectives, project impacts and ADB IR policy was explained.The names of these 12 DPs are provided in the following Table 4.3.

Table 4.3: Individual Consultation with the DPs of P3

Sr.No. Name Location

1 Ejaz s/o Nazar Shah Bhelowal

2 M.Sadiq s/o Wali Mohd Bhelowal

3 M.Razzaq s/I Ghulam Mohd Bhelowal

4 Zulfiqar s/o M. Lateef Bhelowal

5 Ashraf s/o M.Yasin Bhelowal 6 Ghulam Hussain s/o Fateh Mohd Bhelowal 7 Ramzan s/o Sher Mohd Bhelowal 8 M.Inayat s/o M.Hayat Bhelowal 9 Khawaja Bukhsh s/o Moula Bukhsh Malyar

10 Faryad Shah s/o Walayat Shah Malyar

11 Dost Mohd s/o M.nawaz Kahana

12 Haq Nawaz s/o M.Nawaz Nari Shumali

Source: Social and Resettlement Survey by PDA Consultants Jan- Mar.19

4.4.3 Community Priority Needs Like ICB-LARP P1 & P2, during public Consultations and socio-economic survey in the Project area, the needs of the communities were assessed. The Consultations reveal that road and bridges on the proposed Main canal, Distys and FCCs to connect the communities on the both sides was the top priority need of the people. Moreover, the community demanded safeguards of their children where Canal, Distys and FCCs are passing through/near their houses/settlements. 4.4.4 General Opinion of Consulted Communities Like ICB-P2, the ICB-P3 is also a large project area. The vast area of P3 is barren. The owners are deprived from irrigation water and they adopted various occupations for their livelihoods. They have not much concerns over land acquisition rather they are happy that the project have positive impacts on their lands and area. Moreover, Resettlement impact is minimum and very few DPs are losing their structures and fixtures. Therefore during consultation and socio-economic interviews, the DPs losing land showed their satisfaction.Few DPs has concerns over land acquisition for FCCs that impacted their fertile land. However, they expressed their views that with the availability of irrigation water, it would boost-up the socio-economic characteristics of the local community and modify the ecology of the area. Irrigation practices in the area would result in increasing the cropped area, crop yields and cropping pattern, etc. that will be in conjunction with better quality produce into higher farm incomes in the Project area. Moreover, diversified agriculture, livestock & dairy farming, and farm forestry will open new avenues for the rural poor of the project area to improve their livelihood. 4.4.5 Consultations with Relevant Departments Meetings and Consultations were also held with different departments including the Revenue officials and NGO etc. The following points were discussed to provide information about the project:

Location of the Project area;

Objectives and purpose of the project;

Route of the proposed canal;



Land to be acquired;

Demarcation of land;

Role of Revenue Department. In this context, Consultation/meetings were arranged with the following officials/persons who were contacted for P1 & P2 and same were stakeholders of ICB-P3 as well summarized in the following Table 4.4.

Table 4.4:Consultation/Meetinge with the Departments for ICB-P3

Sr. No. Date Designation/Department

1 Regular when required

( Feb.2019-May.2019)

DC Office Jhelum, PA to DC relevant to JIP matters

2 In Feb, March, April and

May 2019

Additional deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Jhelum

3 Frequent when required LAC/Assistant Commissioner, PD Khan

4 Regular when required Tehsildar PD Khan

5 Regular when required Gardawar, Revenue Dept. PD Khan

6 Frequent when required Assistant Commissioner/ LAC Khushab

7 Feb.2019 to May.2019 Naib Tehsildar, Revenue PD Khan

8 Regular when required Area Manager, NRSP, PD Khan

9 Public Health

Engg.Deptt.

PD Khan5-7 Feb.2019

SDO/Sub Engineer to plan for relocation of water

Supply schemes and other water pipes under impact

10 ICI Management, Khewra

9-2-2019 and 19-3 2019

Regarding Main Canal passing through the Factory.

Water pipe line under project impact.

11 Agriculture deptt. Exchanged and shared the knowledge of canal water

12 OFWM, Lahore

12 & 26 Feb.2019

Regarding installation of Nakkas/outlets and area

Development in PMO canals office.

13 Education Deptt.

23 Feb.& 11-12 Mar.19

For facility improvement under Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) head.

4.5 GENDER SURVEY AND CONSULTATION Keeping in view the important role of the female in the household as well as in the society,

gender consultations were also conducted in12 settlements to record views of the 217

females (list of participants is provided in Table 4.5 and photographs are presented in

Annexure-XIII while locations are being provided in the following Table. During interviews

and consultation, data was also collected to ascertain female social status and gender

issues.

Table 4.5: Locations and Number of Participants of Gender Consultations

Sr. No. Mouza/ Village Name of Channel No. of Participants

1 Thatti MC+ FCC-9/2 19 2 Ather Disty-15, FCc-10 18 3 Saroba Disty-14, FCC-9 & 10 15 4 Lillah Bhera MC+FCC12 18 5 Jaithal MC+FCC12 21 6 Kandwal MC+Disty.18 & 19 22 7 Mangwal MC+Disty-17, FCC14 12



Sr. No. Mouza/ Village Name of Channel No. of Participants 8 Jaswal MC+FCC14 & 15 13 9 Daiwal MC+Disty 17 29 10 Nari Shumali Dist-22 & 23+ FCC16 12 11 Jandran Disty. 17, FCC 11 18 12 Jattu Disty.17 20

Total 217 4.5.1 Findings of the Gender Survey The Project area of ICB-Package-3 has the same geoghraphical, environmental, social and agricultural aspects as of ICB-Package-2. The area was less developed regarding facility of educational institutions, health, road and water supply. The peoples of the area especially women were facing many social problems but the most prominent issue recorded was shortage or unavailability of sweet water. A female of each household has the responsility to manage sweet drinking water and she is always busy to manage it. The following pictures show the situation of shortage of water. However, the females were hopeful that with the availability of JIP canal water, the fresh and sweet water will be available so they were very happy on the proposed project.

The results/findings of the gender survey is explained in the following:

Thatti

This community was extremely poor almost uneducated and vulnerable. Gender division of labor is same like of other villages. They were doing household chores and helping hand with their male in agriculture and livestock rearing. Very few female were educated and doing jobs in health sector. The Tehsil Head Quarter hospital was 15km from the village with insufficient health facilities and basic health unit was 3 km away so they have to go to Jhelum and Rawal Pindi in emergency condition. For that, it requires high expenses which were not affordable by the poor and vulnerable people. The commonly found disease was arthritis and Thyroid which caused goiter due to poor quality of drinking water. The pressing needs of the community were clean drinking water, gas, transportation and higher secondary level education. In the village, few domestic violence cases were observed during gender consultations as they named it “Cultural and Common”. “National Rural Support Program (NRSP)” and Akhuwat were working for the livelihood improvement of the poor community by providing small loans and technical trainings.

Ather

Findings of the gender consultation in this village showed that the female of this village were educated and were doing private and Govt. jobs in health and educational departments.



Rest of the female were housewives and handling household chores along with livestock and limited agricultural activities. Women were involved in decision making of the family. No social or cultural constraints which hinder their decision making. They were allowed to do job and participate in other social activities. The NRSP and one non-governmental organization Akhuwat was working in the area to support women financially in form of small scale loans. Unlike the other villages, the good thing was, the clean drinking water available in the village. The critical needs of the community were, gas, vocational centers, high school and most important proper health care facilities. Community was facing problem to reach hospital as transportation was not easy because of poor road condition and hospital was almost 20 km away in PD Khan from the community. The most prevailing disease in the village was Arthritis and hepatitis while the basic health unit was 3 km away from the village with limited health care facilities.

Saroba The village is located between road and proposed FCC-6. The gender team visited for gender consultation regarding the proposed project. The participatory gender survey was conducted through a structured questionnaire to ascertain gender level of the community. The women of the project area were very less educated and doing household chores along with agriculture and livestock activities at limited level. Few female were working in education department and in health sector. Pressing needs of the community were clean drinking water, gas, health facilities, economic opportunities and high school. Health facilities available by the Government were not sufficient or up to the standard. The People were suffering from water borne diseases and other common diseases like Arthritis and skin allergies. Decisions of the family are taken mutually but males are less sensitive regarding female education and their economic development. Generally, the women were happy from the project. They demanded reasonable and market land price so that they can buy the same quantity of land within the compensation amount.

Lillah Bhera The community of this area was not so different from previous village. They were also deprived of basic needs of life. The females of the farming community were doing work outside the home associated agriculture including preparation of land, sowing, crop harvesting and livestock rearing. Women were educated and were doing jobs in Private, Govt. Health and education departments. The hospital was 2 km away from the village/community. People were suffering from arthritis, blood pressure and kidney diseases. Intense needs were clean drinking water, Gas, High school facility, improved health facilities especially for pre natal and post natal care for baby and mother and income earning opportunities. It was revealed during Focus Group Discussions that almost all the decisions were taken mutually. Overall, they were satisfied with the project and compensation regarding lost economic assets. “National Rural Support Program (NRSP)” and “AKHUWAT” were the only two non-profit organizations trying to facilitate people specially women through different livelihood improvement projects.

Jaithal The gender and social Consultation revealed extreme poverty in this village. The cultural & social values and economic set up of the village was same like other villages. In this village, gender segregation of labor was same like other villages of the project area. Women used to handle all the chores and outside regarding limited agriculture and livestock with their partners. The participants were pleased with the proposed irrigation project. They think that their land will become fertile and valuable with the supply of surface irrigation water. Few number of women working in education and health sectors. Over all women were not so educated but they were serious about the education of their children. Nearest health facility



was about 20 km distance which is inconvenience for the community especially for women who needs pre and post natal health care. High-priority needs demanded by the community were clean drinking water as it was most distinctive need of the community because they have to fetch water from 2 km distance on every day basis for drinking purpose. Although water supply was available but for limited time in a week and quality of water was not good for intake. Along with water, they also demanded free health care facilities for old age persons, vocational centers and they want to get small scale loans to start their own business to enhance their economic opportunity. The ground water was saline and waterborne diarrheal diseases were very common there and other diseases were thyroid, kidney and arthritis. “National Rural Support Program (NRSP) a non-profit organization was working there for their economic uplift. Kandwal In the gender Consultation, it was observed that the village was somehow better in economic condition as compared to others. Women were educated and were earning hands of their family. Decision took mutually regarding every aspect of their day to day life. They wanted more economic opportunities and trainings/ skills for educated women. Pressing needs were included, proper roads for transportation, health care facilities, economic opportunities and most importantly clean drinking water. Although water supply was available but quality was not good. The ground water was saline and waterborne diseases like kidney, arthritis and goiter were observed quite a lot. Distance from nearest health facility was more than 4 km from the village with limited facilities and Inconvenient for the women who need maternal health care. Few domestic violence cases were also observed during focus group discussions. The females knew about the irrigation project but not in details. They were explained the project, project objectives and ADB IR policy. Mangwal The land of this village was slightly fertile as compared to other project areas. The participants were pleased with the proposed irrigation project. They think that their land will become fertile and valuable with the supply of surface irrigation water. In this farming community, limited resources of land affected. While asking about their financial services available to them, female answered “National Rural Support Program (NRSP)” this organization worked for the socio-economic up-lift of the communities at large and still working. Now this organization has won the trust of the people because this organization have many success stories regarding livelihood improvement among these communities. Some educated females are also doing jobs in health and education departments in Govt. and private sectors both. As far as health is concerned, situation is same like other villages. No proper health care facilities were reported. The basic health unit was 1 km away from the village. In emergency they have to go to “Daiwal Khushab” Critical needs of this community were high school, gas, roads, and health care facilities and most importantly clean drinking water because underground water is saline. The people are suffering from water borne diseases, other common diseases thyroid which cause goiter, blood pressure and Arthritis. Improper drainage system and lack of middle & high school facility for girls were other including in critical needs. Jaswal The findings of gender Consultation were almost same from the rest of the situation in other villages. Females of this community seemed more economically empowered as they do not face any cultural restrictions from their families. They are also involved in income generating activities like stitching and embroidery other than Govt. jobs in health and education sectors. The problem facing by the community were poor health facilities, bad road condition and transportation, non-availability of water supply on regular basis and gas. Community was



suffering from water borne diseases like Hepatitis, Stomach issues and common diseases were Arthritis, kidney and goiter. “National Rural Support Program (NRSP)” was working there and people were getting benefit from their financial support in form of loans / small credits. Over all, there were no such social and cultural constraints which hinder women to progress only the lack opportunities. They expressed their views about the proposed project as beneficial for the area. Daiwal During the gender/social consultations, it was revealed that social and cultural norms of all impacted areas are same, the people are sharing the same values. Main roles and responsibilities of the female of the community are also same. They try to help their males in all type of work other than household activities regarding livestock, agricultural responsibilities and in income earning activities. Especially in agriculture, they help in sowing, harvesting and picking vegetables, while in livestock rearing they prepare fodder, feeding animals, bathing & watering animals. Decisions are mostly taken by elders of the family and village. The female are normally allowed to do jobs as such no male dominance was observed. Most of communities are living below the poverty line as their main source of earning is farming. No gender based preferences were observed and male found supportive. The community is deprived of basic needs like clean drinking water, gas, schools, income earning opportunities, vocational training centers, drainage system, proper roads and most importantly proper health care facilities for women in need and for old age people. Common diseases were recorded as skin allergy, stomach issues and arthritis. Women were anemic.

NRSP was working there to support women through small scale loans. Nari Shumali Gender survey was conducted in this village with the affected people or beneficiaries of the proposed project (Main Canal) and resulted that gender roles are same like of other affected villages. The females are spending time in house chores and are helping hand with their counterpart in livestock rearing and agricultural activities. Literacy level is not so high but who are educated they prefer to do jobs in health and education sectors privately. Main reason of illiteracy is non-availability of high school in the community. Only those who can afford the education expenses they send their girls to high school and college in Khushab city. The hospital is 10 km away and basic health unit is 1 km far from the village. Immediate needs demanded by community are clean drinking water, health facilities especially for old age persons, job opportunities, vocational training centers and gas. Jandran The social and economic condition of village Jandran was found same as rest of the areas. The community was suffering from lack of employment opportunities most of them were farmers or daily wages labor while women mostly were housewives and their participation from household to social and economic activities as also found high. There was no health facilities in the nearby town while BHU was 5 km away and hospital was about 40 km in P.D.Khan from the village. The decision making was mostly done by the elders of the family. The community demands were not different as they facing lack of educational opportunities for their children, health, transportation and clean drinking water and income earning opportunities were the un-avoidable needs of the community. Jattu Findings of focus group discussion were that people of this village were very poor and deprived of many basic human needs like clean drinking water, road to towards the village



was not there, only a way from barren land leads toward that community. Water available to that community was full of contamination. Salinity is considered as one of the major abiotic stresses for crop production, as here most of cultivated land adversely effected by salinity. The findings of the gender discussion in village Jattu reveal that women were mostly housewives and girls were allowed to get education but high school was about 25 km away, so very few families could afford to send their girls to school. Similarly, the community was facing severe health problem with the reason that hospital was far from village. The commonly found diseases were arthritis, kidney and stomach. The women were less involved in decision making process but socially allowed to participate in all activates. Very few families were getting financial support from Government poverty alleviation projects. 4.5.2 Actions Taken as a Result of the Consultations Based on the consultations with women, similar to ICB-P3,the following actions were taken by PMO(Canals):

Forwarded the proposals for the construction of canal crossing, cloth washing points, cattle guards and fence to protect children to the design team for incorporation in the detailed design

Facilitate linkage of women members of affected households with relevant livelihood agencies and NGOs i.e. NRSP and Akhuwat, etc.

Conduct of separate consultation meetings with women DPs to disclose compensation packages, entitlement and procedures and grievance redress mechanism and the location/design of the drinking water supply. At several locations,design was changed and project impacts were minimized.

Organizing of women-specific project related activities like tree planting along the irrigation canal.

Conduct of women-specific training on canal water use and related topics.

Table 4.6: Gender Consultation and Focus Group Discussion of ICB-P3 Sr. No.

Date Venue Name of Participants

1

27-5-2019

Thatti

Daulat Bi Shakeela Kausar Mehwish Gul Anaya Bibi Maqsood Bibi Tazeem Akhter Nasreen Akhter Zareena Bibi Anara Bibi Nasreen Bibi Nazia Batool Noor Bhari Sunera Kausar Manzooran Bibi Bashiran Bibi Ghulam Fiza Zarina Begum Farzana Kausar Sanawra Bibi

2

27-5-2019

Saroba

Sumaira Balouch Shaheen Akhter Safia Raza Gulan Ruqayya Tasawar Perveen Shakeela Bibi Shaheen Bibi Rani Sultana Nasreen Akhter Sadia Iqbal



Sr. No.


Tasleem Akhter Zaib un Nisa Tazim Akhter

Sania Mustafa

Naureen Akhtere 3

27-5-19

Ather

Iffat Hayat

Kausar perveen

Halima Bibi

Farhat Yasmeen

Ghulam Qubra

Musarrat Perveen

Fozia Kalsoom

Samreen Akhter

Shaheen Akhter

Riffat Hayat

Kalsoom Akhter

Shazia Batool

Rukhsana Kausar

Muqaddas Abbass

Sardar Bibi

Adeela

Maryam Bibi 4

28-5-19

Lillah bhera

Nazima

Rozina

Asma Perveen

Rasoolan Bibi

Ayesha bibi

Musarrat bibi

Satti Bibi

Asia Perveen

Zaferia Bibi

Zaitoon

Nasreen

Nadia Bibi

Sumera Bibi

Umbreen

Najma Bibi

Shabana Bibi

Anwer bibi

Maria Bibi

5

28-5-2019

Jaithal

Najma

Kausar

Muqaddas

Onaza bibi

Kinza

Kausar Bibi

Ghulam Fatima

Zahida perveen

Zaitoon Bibi

Balqees Bibi

Shahnaz Bibi

Perveen



Sr. No.


Zaitun Bibi

Anwer Bibi

Munawara bibi

Seema Bibi

Sughra Bibi

Razia Bibi

Sat bhirai

Amna Bibi

Bashira Bibi

6

28-5-2019

Kandwal

Rukhsana

Nighat Perveen

Nafeesa

Syeda Bibi

Asma

Surayya

Rukhsar

Rukhsana Afzal

Sana Zafar

Noreen Akhter

Nadia Batool

Hussaina

Naheed

Zohra

Shakeela

Mafia Nawaz

Azmat Batool

Ghulam Kubra

Toba Murtaza

Iram Nawaz

Abida Ashraf

7

28-5-2019

Mangwal

Shah Jahan Bibi

Asma

Musarrat

Sajida

Kaneez Fatima

Naseem Fatima

Aziz Fatima

Pathhani Bibi

Nusrat

Manzoor Fatima

Misbah

Maqsooda Bibi

Shameem 8

29-5-2019

Jaswal

Hamida

Perveen

Rehana

Rukhsana

Perveen

Asmat



Sr. No.


Raffat Batool

Sahib Zadi

Saima

Zohra Bibi

Jabeen Fatima

Bushra Bibi

Nadra Bano

9 29-5-2019

Daiwal

Pathhani

Zahida perveen

Sajida

Perveen

Zubaida Bibi

Munawara

Ghulam Fatima

Shoukat Rani

Ghulam Bani

Alam Khatoon

Raj Bibi

AzizFatima

Manzoor Fatima

Naseem

Perveen Akhter

Bushra Zahra

Musarrat Perveen

Ghulam Fiza

Aneela

Ghulam Ayesha

Nusrat Perveen

Kausar Perveen

Musarrat Shaheen

Rabia Bibi

Khalida Bibi

Aqeel Fatima

Amna

Nadia Perveen

10 29-5-2019

Nari Shumali

Rani Bibi

Perveen Akhter

Sat Bhirai

Nasreen Fatima

Farzana

Sonia

Sadia

Kausar Perveen

Asma

Saman

Kishwar

Mueeba

Haleema

11 30-5-2019

Jandran

Ghulam Sakina

Rasoolan Bibi

Shameem Akhter

Kaneez Fatima



Nasreen

Zubaida Bibi

Rubina Safder

Fozia Muneer

Bushra

Uzma Batool

Sadia

Sidra

Bhag Bhari

Shazia

Sadaf

Shahida Perveen

Nadra

Mehwish

12 30-5-2019

Jattu

Rafia

Taj Bibi

Ghulam Sughran

Taj Bi

Ravia

Soria

Rukhzana

Nasreen

Tahira Zainab

Khan Bibi

Khadija

Atiya

Khajida Bibi

Nasra Batool

Zakia bibi

Saima

Soria Ali

Musarrat Jabeen

Asia Bibi

4.6 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

A project level Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) will be set up to address grievances arising from social and LAR impacts. Efforts will be exhausted to avoid grievances through strong consultations participation and information disclosure strategy and the LAR activities will be conducted in accordance with this LARP provisions. The Project will put in place its GRM structures upon approval of the final LARPs. Problems to be addressed by a GRM may include (i) project alignment and requests to avoid specific affected assets, (ii) omission of impacts and some DPs in a census, (iii) impact assessment and valuation of losses, (iv) disbursement of compensation relative to entitlements stipulated in a LARP, (v) disputes about ownership of affected assets apportionment of compensation with payment delay issues, (vii) delays in payment of relocation and rehabilitation costs and design and completion of relocation sites/facilities, or (viii) the adequacy and appropriateness of income restoration measures etc. The GRM will be set up with a three-level structure; one at the village level through the social mobilizers and village head, second at the district level, and third at the PMO (Canals). The



Social and Environment Unit (SEU) will ensure timely establishment of multi-tiered grievance redress system from village level to Project level. The SEU will support PMO (Canals) to establish the grievance redress committee (GRC) at the village, district and PMO (Canals). The GRC at the PMO (Canals) will include Project Director, PMO-Canals as convener, with SEU Director and LAC as well as Project Design Advance (PDA) Consultants or Project Implementation Condultants (PIC) Resettlement Specialist as its members. In addition, the GRC at the PMO-Canals will have members from 2 districts and 2 DP representatives. At the district level, the GRC will be co-chaired by the SEU Director and LAC for the district. Members will include the SEU Deputy Director Social, SEU Deputy Director Community, and 2 DP representatives, assisted and supported by the PDA/PIC social mobilizers. At the village level, the head of the village will be the de-facto head of the GRC, with 2 DP representatives, PIC/PDA Resettlement Specialist and social mobilizers as members. From community side, a Social Framework Agreement (SFA) will be carried out for the safeguards of the local peoples. Any complaints unresolved at the village and district level will be forwarded to the GRC at the PMO (Canals) by the social mobilizers or the complainant himself. The complaints received will be properly recorded and documented at the SEU by the Deputy Director Community in the Complaint Register. The information recorded in the register will include date of the complaint, particulars of the complainant, description of the grievance, actions/steps taken/to be taken to resolve the complaint at village level, the person responsible to take the action, follow up requirements and the target date for the implementation of the mitigation measure. The register will also record the actual measures taken to mitigate these concerns. The complaint system may be connected electronically to connect with all relevant forum or offices. The aggrieved DP will be kept informed about the actions on his complaint. He/she will be assisted by the social mobilizers to participate in the proceedings at different levels of grievance resolution process. Information on the complaints received, actions taken and status of resolution will be included in the regular progress reporting of the project and the internal resettlement monitoring reports. At any time in the process, the complainant will have the option to raise his/her complaint to a competent court. An overview of the structure and functioning of a typical GRM is presented in Table 4.5 below.

Table 4.7:Steps in the Grievance Resolution Process

A cluster of villages (depend upon the number of DPs) may be assigned a social mobilizer to maintain regular contact with the DPs and village heads to be the first line of contact on issues related to LAR.

Any complaints in the village will be recorded by the social mobilizer, and if possible resolved in the village, with the assistance of PDA/PIC consultants and contractor (if already mobilized) within 7 days.

Any complaint which cannot be resolved in the village will be forwarded by the social mobilizer to the GRC at the district level. The GRC at the district attempt to resolve the issue within 15 days upon receipt and will communicate the decision to the complainant.

Any complaint that cannot be resolved satisfactorily at the district GRC will be forwarded to the GRC at the PMO-Canals. Deputy Director Community will record the complaint. GRC at the PMO-Canals will attempt to resolve the complaint within 30 days from the date complaint is received.

About complaints pertaining to disagreement with land award, DP will be facilitated to challenge the award in appropriate court of law as per the process set out in Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894). However, where law permits, the DPs can access to the courts of law without involving the GRM.



5. COMPENSATION, RELOCATION AND INCOME RESTORATION 5.1 GENERAL This section deals with the compensations for affected land, structures and assets that have been proposed on the basis of the findings of the Census Survey; and under the legal and policy framework of Government of Pakistan (GoP) & Asian Development Bank (ADB) Guidelines. The LARP focuses on providing compensations for the lost assets and suggests measures to restore their livelihoods to former living standards of the DPs. 5.2 COMPENSATION FOR AFFECTED LAND 5.2.1 Compensation of Private Land The project of ICB-P3 will impact 4050 acres to construct Main Canal from RD 225+500 to RD 379+750,10 distributaries and 08 FCCs.The land value per Marla/kanal was determined by the DPAC (District Price Assessment Committee), Jhelum and Khushab included 15 percent compulsory acquisition surcharge (see Annexure-XXI of land price Notification).The compensation of 3840 acres of private land is Rs.107,57,45297 (Rs.1075.75Million).The compensation cost of Government land has not allocated in the budget. 5.2.2 Compensationof Government Land Out of total 4050 acres to be acquired for ICB-P3, 210 acres land noted belonged to the Government. This land is scattered under used of roads, link roads, railways and bridges etc and details is provided in the Annexure-II. At many places, the land will be reclaimed after construction of crossings and bridges etc. The land is already acquired hence compensation is not provided in the budget. 5.3 COMPENSATION FOR PRIVATELY OWNED STRUCTURES The privately owned affected structures include residential, Boundary walls,agri.fixtures, irrigation pipesand cattle sheds etc. The semi pacca and pacca structures have been evaluated separately. To estimate the replacement value of residential and other structures. The assets have been standardized for compensation on an average unit rate per Sq.ft. The compensation rates of residential structures are applied as approved by the District Buildings Department, Jhelum Govt.of Punjab 2018-2019, while for compensation of DPs losing fixtures are compensated as per local market rates, which are provided in Annexure-XVIII. The compensation for various type of main structures is given in Table 5.1 The details of all affected structures along with compensation and allowances to be paid is provided in Annexure-I. A compensation amount of Rs.1.60 million is provided in the budget.

Table 5.1:Construction Rates of Various Type of Construction

Sr. No.

Details of Structures Affected

Area (Sq.ft.)

Unit Rate Rs.sq.ft.

1

Residential Rooms

i) Pacca 300 830

ii) Semi Pacca 496 662 Washroom

i) Pacca 78 830 Boundary Wall

i) Pacca 602 170

2 Livestock Sheds/Room

i) Pacca 189 830



Sr. No.

Details of Structures Affected

Area (Sq.ft.)

Unit Rate Rs.sq.ft.

ii) Semi Pacca 663 662

iii) Water pipes for irrigation ( Running foot)

330 170-260

iv)Tube well Bore Bore 40000

v)Sump well Pacca 45 170

vi) water course Pacca 20 250

Source. Data by Consultants social teams and rates of Buildings Deptt.+local market

5.4 COMPENSATION OF COMMUNITY OWNED STRUCTURES During detailed resettlement survey, the social resettlement teams recorded community structures of community water supply schemes located at various sites serving to different Mouza like Saroba, tobha, Ather, Dhuddi Thal, kahana, Jaithal, Bugga, Jaswal and Daiwal.Majority of the water pipes of these schemes were under impact and need to be re-fixing after construction of irrigation channels and FCCs without interruption of water supply as this is the solely source of drinking water. This will be included in the “WORKS” to be carried out through the Contractor of Package-3 or parent department. 5.5 COMPENSATION OF PUBLIC FIXTURES

The ICB-P1 & P2 had siginificant project impact. There were tubewells, tube well bores and other industries which required electricity through electric poles. In ICB-P3, 18 WAPDA electricity poles(cement/steel) were found under project impacts.The compensation cost of Rs.5,40,000 is allocated in the budget. The location and compensation cost to shift these electric poles are provided in the Annexure-VI. 5.6 COMPENSATION OF PRIVATE NON-FRUIT AND FRUIT TREES Total 1995` (1039 mature and 956 sapling) privately owned trees belonged to 172 DPs were identified in the RoW of main canal,distributaries and FCCs for which compensation have been allocated in the budget.The project will compensate to the DPs owning these trees. A tree is observed having the weight of 20 monds (800 kg). The local rate of fuel timber/wood is Rs.300 per mond (40 kg), amounting total compensation cost per tree will be Rs.6000. The mature tree is compensated at Rs.6000, while sapling tree is compensated at Rs.3000.The owner is allowed to take/use tree wood as salvage material. The total cost of 1995 trees will be Rs.9.10 million. This amount is allocated in the budget. The chain age wise data of non-fruit trees have been provided in the Annexure-IV. As far as fruit trees are concerned,during trees counting survey, no fruit trees were recorded under project impacts. The main reason was that a vast area is lying without cultivation due to brackish water and not fit for tree plantation except local and wild plants etc. 5.7 COMPENSATION OF GOVT. TREES In the ROW of ICB-P3, 63 Govt. owned trees (58 matured and 5 sapling) were recorded at various locations and compensation made as per approved rates of Forest, Wildlife & Fisheries, Lahore dated 14 July 2017, Government of the Punjab. 10 new plants/trees against one uprooted tree accounting total 630 trees will be replanted. The cost of replantation of 630 trees comes out Rs.198494 that is allocated in the budget. The copy of Notification and rates are provided in the Annexure-XIX. The PMO(Canals) will coordinate with the relevant department to sort out its removal and method of compensation. The locations of these trees



and compensation cost is provided in the Annexure-V, while the compensation cost of Rs. 198494 is also allocated in the budget (Chapter 7). 5.8 COMPENSATION OF CROPS

As per revenue record, out of 3973 acres of private land under project impact of ICB-P3,75acres (600 kanals) are currently under cultivation in both crop season, Kharif and Rabi (summer and winter). The compensation of one kanal (both season) is calculated Rs.6813 amounting total crop compensation Rs.4.09 Million, which has been allocated in the budget. The compensation will be provided to 1370 DPs losing crop losses. The crop compensation is calculated based on the local grain market rates, Pind Daden Khan has also been provided in the Annexure-II for each crop affected DP and local agricultural commodity market rates are shown in Annexure-XXI. 5.9 RELOCATION OPTIONS

In LARP-P3, no relocation is required as 01 DP will lose only sitting room separate from family main structures and no need to relocate. He will be compensated for structure and shifting.The details have been provided ion the Section 2.2.3 and Table 2.5. 5.9.1 Residential Structures

01 DP will lose only sitting room separate from family main structures and no need to relocate. He will be compensated for structure and shiftingand don‟t need relocation as their families are not disrurbing.The details of the compensation has been provided in Annex-I.

5.9.2 Additional Assistance for Vulnerable and Severely Affected DPs Vulnerable have been identified from the list of only structures affected DPs and list of DPs whose income was below OPL. An additional vulnerable allowance have been provided to DPs having less income than OPL. To findout vulnerable DPs was a big task based on the following reasons:

a) There were 53355 DPs losing land and structures,

b) Through Socio-economic survey and verification through village Numberdar/Chairman, 236 DPs were contacted and data was collected to find out vulnerable

c) Due to non-mutation of land, a piece of ten acre land was registered to all family member showing small ownership of each member. The family monthly income was more than Rs.50000 that was good enough for their livelihoods. Although, ten acre land is not small land ownership and if one or two acre land is acquired for the project, the owner will not become landless or vulnerable. But in the revenue record, ten acres land is owned by 5-8 members and in case of land acquisition for the project, some family member will become landless and vulnerable. Infact,that was not true.

First, the vulnerable were identified during socio-economic interviews. Second, the land jama bandi of DPs of each Mouza/village were provided to the Chairman/Numberdar and out of that list, he verified the DPs as vulnerable. The list of Vulnerable is provided in the Annexure-VII and verified scanned copies of vulnerable are depicted in Annexure-XVI. The three OPL (minimum wage fixed by the Govt.) as additional assistance/ support i.e. Rs10.62 million to these 236 vulnerable has been provided in the budget.



Similarly, DPs losing >10 percent of their productive land were 48 and crop compensation of one year have been provided in the budget. Although these 48 DPs are losing a very small piece of land for the project and it will not affect their livelihood, hence one year crop income is being paid to these DPs.The total compensation amount is Rs. 23,77,398/= (Rs.2.38 million) provided in the budget.The snaps of productive and unproductive land is provided below for fair comparison.

Productive land of P-3Unproductive land of P-3

5.9.3 Income Restoration Although the Project is anticipated to make a positive impact on the economy of the area, those losing main source of their income (i.e. losing 10 percent or more of their agricultural landwere 48 DPs or those who will be physically displaced from housing and vulnerable households are disproportionally affected and may have more difficulty coping with their displacement. It is estimated that a total of 236 DPs will need additional support to help them to restore their livelihood. The following actions will be made to support severely affected and vulnerable DPs to restore their livelihood. For this important achievement, the services of a Livelihood Specialist shall be hired from either side i.e. through PMO-Canals or Project Implementation Consultant (PIC). His role and responsibilities is discussed in the following section: Role & Responsibilities of Livelihood Specialist:

A number of employment opportunities will be created during the construction phase, particularly for the un-skilled labor. The Livelihood Specialist can prepare a database of DPs or their children who are 18 years and above.

He will prepare an inventory of the DPs/children covering age, health condition, gender, education, relevant experience and willingness to do job with the Contractor.

The Livelihood Specialist will guide and fdacilitate the applicants in arranging police certificate showing that no criminal case is registered aginst them. This is important for security purpose.

He will provide the data to the Contractor and will ask to provide the jobs to the applicants on priority basis keeping in view their education and skill.

The Contractor should prefer to employ the un-skilled/skilled labor (male and female)



from the DPs/local communities under the Contact Clause 6.1, Section 8 Specific Provision of Pariticular Conditions of Contract (Part B).

The Livelihood Specialist will inform the DPs about the available job opportunities on the project.

He will also negotiate with the Contractor in fixing salary/wage of the DPs or their children.

He will also ask the left over applicants (who could not get jobs due to lack of skill) to obtain them technical training in the local cities/towns. For this purpose, the Livelihood Specialist will collect the data of the existing technical institutions/centers in the area and will manage their admission in short courses i.e. welding, shuttering, masonry and other skills related to construction field. In addition to obtaining training in construction related activities, arrangements for the interested applicants in other trades like computer,surveyoretc. will also be arranged. After completing their training/courses, the Livelihood Specialist will arrange their jobs on the project. 5.10 COMPENSATION FOR DPS WITH LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPEDIMENTS A condition for commencing civil works is the completion of compensation payments and provision of allowances to DPs. However, there are cases when compensation cannot be disbursed to certain DPs due to a number of legal and administrative impediments. DPs who are unable to receive their compensation include:

i. DPs who did not accept the award due to objection to (a) the measurement of the land or affected asset, (b) the amount of compensation, (c) the person to whom it is payable, or the apportionment of the compensation among the persons interested;

ii. Absentee land owners (DPs living overseas or in other parts of the country), and without an authorized representative to collect compensation;

iii. DPs with pending inheritance mutations; iv. DPs unenthusiastic to collect meager compensation amount; v. DPs unable to alienate the acquired asset like juveniles with no legally documented

guardian or due to other issues. Compensation for both land and non-land assets is deemed to have been paid when the amount in cash or cheque has been provided to DPs or deposited into their bank account, or in the District Treasury ready to be withdrawn at any time the impediment is resolved. Although compensation of these DPs is beyond the control of the Collector and are mainly dependent of the actions of the DPs or ruling/decision from a third-party i.e. the court or BOR, PMO(Canals) will exert good-faith efforts to (a) contact and notify DPs through their last known address, village heads or kin; (b) inform DPs who to contact or where to proceed to collect their compensation; and (c) explore possible actions that may help them receive their compensation. SEU, with support from its Consultants will undertake continued community consultations and outreach in order to locate, assist and guide DPs with legal and administrative impediments. SEU will make efforts including multiple visits1 to villages with pending compensation payments, organizing village meetings, posting of notices in public places, serving notices at

1 Repeated visits in three consecutive months scheduled for each village by the Land Acquisition Collector / SEU to deliver

compensation to unpaid DPs and identify those with legal and administrative impediments. The repeated visits should be documented showing visit schedule, information disclosure reports, list of persons met and field visit reports duly endorsed by the local community and the village headman confirming number of identified DPs with legal and administrative impediments.



last known address of DPs and publishing the names of unpaid DPs in the print media is needed to demonstrate that due efforts were conducted in addressing cases with impediments.



6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 6.1 INTRODUCTION The Social and Environment Unit (SEU) was established under the PMO-Canals to deal with environment and social safeguards issues of the Project. For implementation of LARP of the Project, the organization set up is presented in Figure 6.1. The Project Director of PMO-Canals has the overall responsibility for the preparation, updating and implementation of the LARPs. He will be assisted by the Director (Social and Environment) of SEU. The Director–Social and Environment will be responsible for project level preparation and implementation of all resettlement activities. SEU will be assisted by the safeguards team from the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC). The institutional set up and roles and responsibilities of various officials and units under the set up are discussed in this section.

• Project Management Office for Canals(PMO-Canals) • Social and Environment Unit (SEU) • Project Implementation Consultant (PIC)/PMO Support Consultant • External Monitoring Consultant (EMC) • Grievance Redress Committee (GRC)

6.2 PID/PMO(CANALS) The Punjab Irrigation Department (PID) will be overall responsible for the project preparation; implementation and financing of all LAR tasks and for cross-agency coordination. PID will exercise its functions through the Project Management Office for Canals (PMO-Canals with general project execution responsibility and through the SEU to be tasked with daily LARP implementation activities at the project level. The coordination involved for various institutions for the preparation and implementation of the LARPs include District government (including concerned Deputy Commissioners (DCs)). The detail of team is given in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1:Roles and Responsibilities in LARP Implementation

Sr. No.

Institution Roles and Responsibilities

1 PMO-Canals Responsible for the implementation and overall supervision of the project, including the implementation and internal monitoring of the LARPs.

2 Contractor Responsible for the construction works under the social and environment conditions.

3 PIC/PMO Support Consultants

Responsible for the planning and design of the project and support PMO-Canals in the implementation and internal monitoring of the LARPs.

4 District Administration

Coordinates with all stakeholders and keep law and order related to security measures.

5 Community Responsible to resolve social conflicts and to safeguard their rights.

6 Independent Monitor/External Monitoring Consultant

PMO(Canals) will hire the services of a Consultants who would be fully responsible for monitoring of LARP implementation and report to PMO (Canals) and the ADB.

7 Asian Development Bank

ADB is the donor of the Jalalpur Irrigation Project and has supervisory role.

8 Revenue Department

District Collector/Deputy Commissioner is responsible for the valuation of the lost assets and disbursement of the compensations of lost assets.



6.2.1 Social and Environment Unit (SEU) The SEU, headed by a Director-Social and Environment, will have the overall responsibility for updating, implementation and monitoring of the LARPs in coordination with the District administration, Revenue Department and other line departments. Specifically, the SEU will:

update the census of DPs linked with project impacts by type, category and severance and prepare compensation packages for each DP on the basis of agreed unit rates and entitlements criterion;

Disclose the LARP to the DPs and place at the union council and PID website;

translate the LARP in local language;

develop and maintain a grievance redress mechanism for the Project and reporting its implementation;

distribute notices to the entitled DPs regarding their payment of compensation;

disburse compensation payment for structures and allowances;

conduct regular monthly meetings to review the progress regarding LARP implementation as per the schedule given in this resettlement plan;

organize, conduct and record meaningful/informed consultations participation with DPs;

develop a database of DPs;

regularly monitor LARP implementation and preparing semi-annual internal monitoring reports;

coordinate closely with all stakeholders–Punjab Government/ officials, project affected community and other concerned for the smooth functioning of project activities;

facilitate the DPs in completing necessary documentation to receive their entitled payments;

help DPs to put their complaints (if any) in front of GRCs, if still issue not resolved consult the Court of law.

oversee the livelihood restoration facilitation support activities for DPs i.e. linking with project-related jobs and other livelihood support programs, livelihood orientation, guidance on proper use of compensation payments,and

facilitatePMO-Canals in recruiting an external monitoring consultant to conduct the external monitoring studies.

The Director-Social and Environment will be supported by the Deputy Director (Social), Deputy Director (Community Relations), Deputy Director (Environment) and Resettlement Specialist (Support Consultant- PMO-Canals in overseeing different aspects of the LARP preparation and implementation. 6.2.2 Deputy Director (Social) The Deputy Director Social will work under the overall guidance and supervision of the Director, Social and Environment and will be directly responsible for overseeing the execution of all tasks of implementing the LARP.



The DD Social will:

oversee the preparation of the package-wise final LARPs;

ensure that LAR activities as per the LARP are implemented within the agreed time schedule;

ensure that the funds necessary for carrying out resettlement activities in the field are released to LAC, and other agencies (as assigned with resettlement tasks) on time and such activities are carried out without any administrative difficulties;

undertake consultation activities with DPs, establish and coordinate with the GRCs and help identify and resolve complaints from DPs and key stakeholders;

take the lead in the livelihood restoration facilitation activities for the DPs;

monitor the implementation of LARP and apprise the Director Social & Environment of required changes, compliance status and additions to the implementation strategy;

monitor to ensure that women headed households have received their compensation payment including the support assistance (in the shape of allowances);

monitor the women capacity building activities and other needs and demands as reflected in the LARP is fully addressed on time;

facilitate consultations and information dissemination for women DPs;and

Submit comprehensive periodic progress reports to PMO-Canals through the Director Social and Environment.

6.2.3 Deputy Director – Community Relations The DD-Communication will:

monitor to ensure that all DPs are fully aware about the on-going resettlement implementation activities;

ensure to disclose the monitoring reports with DPs and also in local language;

ensure to display the monitoring reports on the PID and ADB websites;

coordinate with SEU, PIC and ADB through Director Social & Environment;

support the DD-Social in undertaking consultation activities with DPs, regularly link with the GRCs and DP representatives to help identify and resolve complaints from DPs and key stakeholders; and

support the DD-Social in the livelihood restoration facilitation activities for the DPs particularly in linking with existing livelihood support programs and project-related jobs.

liaise with the concerned district officers of Jhelum responsible for gender development activities;

6.3 EXTERNAL MONITORING CONSULTANT (EMC) PMO(Canals) will hire an individual expert (with team) to conduct independent monitoring for the implementation of LARP. The Consultant shall review the implementation progress throughout the LARP implementation, as reported in the internal monitoring reports (IMR) of the PMO-Canals, evaluate the level of achievement of LARP objectives, assess the process of LARP implementation and its compliance with ADB procedures and standards, identify the



gap if any and propose remedial measures for implementation. The EMC will verify the completion of compensation and provision of assistance recommend the issuance of no-objection for commencing civil works. Prior to the closure of the Project, the EMC will also conduct an evaluation of the overall LARP implementation. 6.4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (GRC) Upon approval of the final LARPs, a grievance redress committee (GRC) will be established for addressing conflicts and appeal procedures regarding eligibility and entitlements followed in the implementation of resettlement activities. GRCs will receive and facilitate the resolution of affected persons‟ concerns and grievances. It explains how the procedures are accessible to DPs and are gender sensitive. The detail is discussed in the following section of this LARP. 6.5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR The District Collector is the Government administrative authority of the district responsible for land acquisition and payment of compensation to the affected landowners as per the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. The District Collector maintains official records and has the legal/administrative authority for land titling and therefore assuring eligibility of DPs for compensation. Cognizant of the fact that the District Collector is under staffed to conduct the land tenure verification and land acquisition process for project affected properties within the project specified time limits, the Project has already allocated funds (provide honorarium) for the deputed revenue staff for working on odd hours. During the implementation process, District Collector has appointed officer as Land Acquisition Collector (LACs) of Tehsils PD Khan and Khushab to assist in establishing the identity of the owners of the affected properties and process the documents for compensation payment. The LAC, assisted by PMO-Canals staff, would be in-charge of land records and revenue. Funds for land acquisition is deposited in the district revenue treasury which the District Collector taps to make payments to the DPs, by way of crossed cheque, following issuance of land award as required by LAA 1894. 6.6 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANTS (PIC) Resettlement specialists of the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) will ensure that sound methodologies and practices are followed in the implementation of LARP. The Consultants will also assist in forming and training the GRCs and other units involved in LARP updating and implementation. The Consultants will advise on required changes in the modalities of the implementation work, participate in meetings with SEU, Director (S&E), DD (Social), DD (Community Relations) and DD (Environment) in monitoring the work of the SEU. The Consultants will also review, on behalf of PD, the implementation progress reports, submitted by the SEU on a regular basis. 6.7 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART An Organogram showing the institutional arrangements for the implementation of LARP has been illustrated through a diagram presented in Figure 6.1.



Figure 1: Organizational Chart ,

District Level Coordination

Social and Environment Unit (SEU) in PMO

(Canals)

• Director Social and Environment

• Deputy Director Resettlement

• Deputy Director (Environment)

• Deputy Director (Community Relations)

Grievance Redress

Committee (GRC)

Project Proponent (PP) (PID)/

Project Management Office for

Canals (PMO-Canals))

Punjab Government

Contractor

External Monitor

Project Implementation Consulant

(PIC) comprising Resettlement &

Livelihood Expert and Project

Support Consultant

District Collector/Deputy Commissioner Land Acquisition Collector/ Assistant

Commissioner Forest Department Agriculture Department Buildings and Works Department

Project DPs



7. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING All the project impacts have been taken in to account and measured accurately. As per ADB,s Resettlement policy, the estimated budget of Rs. 1112.16Million to compensate all DPs and smoothly LARP implementation is allocated. The details of budget are provided in the following Table 7.1.

Table 7.1:Detailed Resettlement Budget of ICB-P3

Sr. No.

Affected Item No. Unit Rate

(Rs.)

Total Land Compensation With 15 percent

LAS

Remarks

1

Private Land of Main Canal, Distys & FCCs (acres)

3840 Refer to Annex-

XXI of DPAC

1,07,57,45297 (Rs.1075.75 Million)

Ref. Annex-II Land price determined by the DPAC, Jhelum& Khushab. No compensation of Govt. Land

Govt.Land (forest & roads) (acres)

210 Annex-II

Sub-total 2

Crop Compensation

Rabi/Kharif (Kanal) 600 Rs.6813/kanal

40,87,800

Ref. Table 2.6 and Section 2.2.5 & 5.8

Sub-total (1-2) 1,07,98,33097 3

Residentials Rooms,Boundarywalls,Washrooms and Livestock sheds etc.

Total No. of Structures

Affected Area (sq.ft.)

Unit Rate/ (sq.ft.)

Total Compensation (Rs.)

Reference No

02 Residential +02 Cattle shed structures

1648

As per approved rates

13,39,773

For details,Ref. Annex-I

4

Compensation of Private Tube well, Water pipes,Farmroom and Water course etc

i)1Tubewells‟ ii) water pipes iii) farm room pacca iv) water course

1 bore 330 ft 157 ft 20 ft

As per approved rates

2,60,969

Table: 5.1 Ref. Annex-I

5 Compensation of Public Structures ( WAPDA Elecricity Poles)

i)Shifting of Poles

18

Rs.30000/pole

5,40,000

Ref.Annex-VI

6

Compensation of Private Trees

i) Non-fruit trees of 172 DPs

Mature= 1039 Sapling=956

Rs.6000 Rs.3000

91,02,000

Section. 2.7, 5.6 Annexture-IV

7

Govt.Trees 630 replacement of 63

Repleshment cost 198494

Section.2.7.6 & 5.7 Annexure-V& XIX

Sub-Total Cost of Item 3-7

1,09,12,74333

8

Other Allowances

a)(Relocation Allowance)

Not applicable

0

0

Annexture-I

b)Vulnerable 236 DPs 52500/ DP 1,23,90,000 Annexture-II & VII



Sr. No.

Affected Item No. Unit Rate

(Rs.)

Total Land Compensation With 15 percent

LAS

Remarks

Allowance 3 months

c)Livelihood Allowance 6 months

Not applicable

-

- Annexure-II

d)Severely Impact Allowance

48 Equal to one crop income

23,77,398 Sec.5.9 Annex-VIII

e)Shifting Allowance 12 DPs Rs.10000/DP

1,20,000 Annexture-I

& Table 5.9.4

Sub-Total of 8 (Allownces) 1,48,87398 9

Other Misc. Costs

M&E TBN Lumpsum 10,00,000 Internal M&E

External Monitoring Consultant

TBN Lumpsum

15,00,000

As per LARP impl.schedule, one month input.

Training cost - Lumpsum 5,00,000 Training of 2-3 days

Provision of budget for the input of Livelihood Expert

Lumpsum -

Budget has been allocated in ICB-P1, as Livelihood Expert will work in three ICBs for 18 months on intermittent basis

Contingencies Lumpsum 30,00,000 Un seen expenses Sub-Total of 9 (Misc) 60,00,000

GrandTotal (Rs) From 1-9

1,11,21,61731 Rs.1112.16 Million

JIP-ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3 , RD 225+00 to RD 379+750


8. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF LARP 8.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE After approval of updated LARP from ADB, the compensation shall be paid to all DPs in accordance with the provisions of the EM. The contractor shall not commence the civil works prior to implementation of the LARP in concurrence with ADB. If it is established that some encroachers or squatters have entered into RoW after cut-of-date, PID/PMO-Canals reserves the right of demolishing such unauthorized structures without paying any compensation; simply by serving a sixty days‟ notice for eviction from the project site. The basic resettlement related steps for implementation of this Updated LARP for ICB-P3 are summarized in Table 8.1.

Table 8.1:Updated LARP Implementation Schedule of ICB-P3

Step Action Responsibility Date of Task Completion

1 Submission of Updated LARP to PMO-Canals PDA Consultants 24-6-2019

2 Approval of Updated LARP ADB 21-7-2019

3 Publication of notification under section 5 of LAA DC/LAC/Commissioner 30-6-2018

4 Urdu Translation and Disclosure of Updated LARP

PMO/Support Consultant

With in one week of ADB approval

5 Conducting Census of DPs (with socio-economic data) immediately following the notification section 6

PDA Completed

6 Land award under section 11 of LAA DC/LAC 20-8-2019

7 Distribution of Notices to DPs for Payment of Compensation for Land, Structures and Allowances

PMO/Support Consultant & LAC

25-8-2019

8 Disbursement of Payment of Compensation for Affected Assets and Allowances


1-9-2019

9 Eviction of 02 residential DPs LAC/Contractor No need to relocate

10 Efforts on Cases with Legal and Administrative Impediment


10-9-2019

11

Hiring and mobilization of EMC PMO/PIC 31-7-2019

12 EMC to Submit Validation Report on LARP Implementation for ADB Approval

EMC 25-8-2019

13 No Objection for Issuance Notice to Proceed (NTP) with Civil work.

ADB 10-9-2019

14 Commencement of Civil Works in the area of P3 Contractor 25-9-2019

8.2 PROCESS OF LARP IMPLEMENTATION The Updated LARP of ICB-P3 will be implemented by PMO-Canals with support from its Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) and inputs from representatives of DPs. The PIC will keep the DPs informed about project‟s activities, compensation and assistance package duly approved by PID and ADB. The DPs will participate in all the decisions relating to implementation of LARP. DPs will also be involved in the grievance redress to review and resolve any dispute concerning compensation and other resettlement issues. The whole process shall be monitored and evaluated by a third party throughout the implementations cycle. According to the proposed timeline of achieving various tasks for LARP implementation. DPs will be served with 60 days advance notices upon receipt of compensation to vacate/ remove



the affected assets/ structures. All activities will be completed in accordance with the resettlement tasks process. 8.3 DISCLOSURE OF LARP AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION This LARP in Urdu will be disclosed to the DPs immediately after the ADB approval. The LARP in English will be posted on the ADB website after the PID endorsement. A notice in Urdu summarizing compensation provisions will be sent to all DPs. Moreover, this LARP will be made available to the Local/District Government of Jhelum as well as PID field office at Jhelum as an official public document. SEU, with the help of PDA and PIC will undertake public disclosure of the LARP along this project corridor of impact considering the following main objectives:

Inform and explain the entitlement policy and various options to the (DPs) prior to payment, compensation and other financial assistance;

Socially prepare the DPs, particularly house-owners and owners/operators for removal/relocation;

Help counter rumors and prevent unnecessary distress;

Bring clarity on issues that might be raised by the DPs, including the affected households about their entitlements and benefits;

Solicit and help the DPs and encourage their participation in LARP implementation;

Attempt to ensure that vulnerable groups understand the process and their needs are specifically taken into consideration.

The participation of DPs is also ensured in the LARP implementation through their involvement in the Grievances Redress Committee (GRC). The PID field office and PIC will establish and continuously maintain interaction with the DPs and community to identify problems to undertake remedial/corrective actions.



9. MONITORING AND EVALUATION Resettlement tasks under the project are subjected to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by the SEU, with support from its PIC. The external monitoring and evaluation will be assigned to an External Monitoring Consultant (EMC). 9.1 INTERNAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION Internal monitoring will be carried out routinely by the SEU at upon completion of payment of compensation and provision of allowances to DPs in sections that are proposed for clearing and handing over for civil works. Indicators set for the internal monitoring will be those relating to process and immediate outputs and results. This information will be collected directly from the field and reported monthly to the PMO-Canals to assess the progress and results of this LARP implementation, and to adjust the work program, if necessary. The monthly reports will be consolidated semi-annually in the standard supervision reports to ADB. Specific monitoring will be:

Information campaign and consultation with DPs;

Extent of requirement for clearing the RoW;

Payment / Compensation for affected land, structures and other assets;

Payment against loss of income;

Payment to vulnerable DPs and

Income restoration activities.

9.2 EXTERNAL MONITORING & EVALUATION The project includes a provision for external monitoring and evaluation o f the implementation of the subproject resettlement plans by an External Monitoring Consultant (EMC). ADB approved Terms of Reference (TOR) would be followed for the procurement. The EMC wil l independently verify the completion of compensation payments and provision of allowances in sections proposed for clearing and handing over for civil works. And review implementation o f LARP biannually and evaluate whether the basic objective of the LARP and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement concerning involuntary resettlement are being met. 9.2.1 Scope of work Brief scope of services of EMC will be as under:but not limited to the following.The ADB may add more scope of work keeping in view the project and LARP requirements:

Identify and select impact indicators;

Confirm the completion of compensation payments and recommend if no-objection for commencing civil works can be issued.

Review and verify internal monitoring reports prepared by LAR Unit and its field offices (PIUs);

Review of the socio-economic baseline census information;

Monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of PMO-Canals, PIC, LAC and NGO/Agency (if any) in LARP Implementation;

Monitor and assess whether resettlement objectives, particularly livelihoods and living standards of the DPs have been restored or enhanced;

Prepare time-bound Corrective Action Plan (CAP) with the help of support Consultants and monitor its implementation;



Assess adequacy of efforts in resolving cases with legal and administrative impediments and recommend measures needed, in case of gaps;

Conduct impact assessment through formal and informal surveys with DPs;

Consultation with DPs, officials, community leaders for preparing review report;

Assess the resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning;

Review and verify the progress in land acquisition/resettlement implementation of the Project and prepare bi-annual reports for the PMO-Canals and ADB.

Evaluate and assess the adequacy of compensation given to the DPs and the livelihood opportunities and incomes as well as the quality of life of DPs of project-induced changes;and

Evaluate and assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the consultative process with affected DPs, particularly those vulnerable, including the adequacy and effectiveness of grievance procedures and legal redress available to DPs, and dissemination of information about these.

9.2.2 Reporting Requirement

The EMC will prepare a compensation completion review report upon the completion of compensation payments and recommend whether no-objection can be issued to hand-over the site for commencing civil works and submit reports biannually external monitoring reports on the agreed impact indicators i.e. implementation of livelihood restoration activities, remaining LARP activities, grievance redress mechanism and consultation with DPs. Copies of the EMC report will be submitted to the PMO-Canals for its review and endorsement to ADB. The language of the reports will be English. Illustrations, if necessary, will be provided as part of the reports.

If significant issues are identified in the external resettlement monitoring report, a time-bound Corrective Action Plan (CAP) will be prepared, reviewed and approved by ADB and disclosed to DPs. The CAP implementation progress will also be reviewed and monitored by the EMC and will be made part of the subsequent monitoring reports. Internal and external monitoring and reporting will continue until all LAR activities have been completed, including restoration of temporarily used land and emerging LAR issues during project implementation.

NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS

ANNEXURES

JIP-ADB PDA 6006: PAK Detailed Design Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan of Jalalpur Irrigation Project ICB-P3 , RD 225+500 To RD 379+750

NESPAK with sub-consultants ICS and TRS 1

Annexure-I: Compensation Details of Private Owned Structures of ICB-P3

ID.

NO Name of DP

Father/

Husband

Name

Locatio

n R

D

Vill

age

Mo

nth

ly Incom

e

Rs.

Str

uctu

re

Cate

gory

Aff

ecte

d

Str

uctu

re

Str

uctu

re T

ype Size ft

Unit R

ate

Rs.

Estim

ate

d C

ost

Rs.

To

tal E

stim

ate

d

Cost

of A

ffecte

d

Str

uctu

re R

s.

Shiftin

g/T

ransport

atio

n A

llow

ance

Rs

Vuln

era

be

Allo

wance R

s.

Liv

elih

ood

Allo

wance R

s.

Self R

elo

catio

n

Allo

wnace.R

s

To

tal E

stim

ate

d

Com

pensatio

n R

s.

Length

Wid

th+

Heig

ht

Are

a S

qft

Disty-13

1 Ejaz Shah

Nazar

Shah 4+00 Bhelowal 50000 B/wall B/Wall Pacca 170 - 170 170 28900 28900 10000 - - - 38900

Disty-16

2 Khawaja

Bukhsh

Moula

Bux 17+00 Malyar 18416

Irrigation

Pipe

Water Pipe

disty

crossed

Plastic 110

8

inch

dia

110 260 28600 28600 10000 - - - 38600

3 Faryad

Shah

Wlalayat

shah 19+050 Malyar 30000

Irrigation

Pipe

Water pipe

disty

crossed

Cement

120

8

inch

dia

120 184 22080 22080 10000 - - - 32080

Disty-18

4 Dost Mohd M.Nawaz 4+750 Kahana 22000 Agriculture

Well Pacca 9 5 45 170 7650

52650 10000 - - - 62650 TW Bore Bore - - 40000 40000

Water

Course Pacca 10 2 20 250 5000

Disty-23

5 Haq Nawaz

M.

Nawaz 29+000 Nari 25000 Farm room Room Pacca 12.30 12.75 156.83 830 130169 130169 10000 - - - 140169

FCC-9/1

6 M.Sadiq Wali

Mohd 2+500 Bhelowal 59000 Residential

Bethak/room Pacca 20 15 300 830 249000

294028 10000 -

No

livelihood

disturbed

No need

of

relocation

304028 W.room Pacca 7 7.75 54.25 830 45028



ID.

NO Name of DP

Father/

Husband

Name

Locatio

n R

D

Vill

age

Mo

nth

ly Incom

e

Rs.

Str

uctu

re

Cate

gory

Aff

ecte

d

Str

uctu

re

Str

uctu

re T

ype Size ft

Unit R

ate

Rs.

Estim

ate

d C

ost

Rs.

To

tal E

stim

ate

d

Cost

of A

ffecte

d

Str

uctu

re R

s.

Shiftin

g/T

ransport

atio

n A

llow

ance

Rs

Vuln

era

be

Allo

wance R

s.

Liv

elih

ood

Allo

wance R

s.

Self R

elo

catio

n

Allo

wnace.R

s

To

tal E

stim

ate

d

Com

pensatio

n R

s.

Length

Wid

th+

Heig

ht

Are

a S

qft

7 Razzaq Ghulam

Hussain 2+500 Bhelowal 47000 Cattle Shed Room

Semi

Pacca 25.5 26 663 662 438906 438906 10000 - - - 448906

8 Zulfiqar M.Lateef 2+500 Bhelowal 18000 Boundary

Wall

Boundary

Wall Pacca 174 - 174 170 29580 29580 10000 - - - 39580

9 Ashraf Yasin 3+070 Bhelowal 40000 Boundary

Wall

Animal

Boundary

Wall

Pacca 190 - 190 170 32300 32300 10000 - - - 42300

10 M.Inayat M.Hayat 3+070 Bhelowal 68000

Residential

under

construction

Room=2 Semi

Pacca 36.75 13.5 496.13 662 328435

348044 10000

No

livelihood

disturbed

No

family

relocation

358044

Latrine Pacca 4.5 5,25 23.63 830 19609

11 Ghulam

Hussain

Fateh

Mohd 3+100 Bhelowal 42000

Boundary

Wall

Boundary

Wall Pacca 68 - 68 170 11560 11560 10000 - - - 21560

12 M.Ramzan Sher

Mohd 3+100 Bhelowal 20000 Cattle Shed Shed Pacca 13 14.5 188.5 830 156455 156455 10000 - - - 166455

Total 1573272 120000 - - 1693272



Annexure-II: Land to be Acquired and list of DPs under ICB-P3

See Separate VolumePART-2



Annexure-III Construction Rates Approved by the District Buildings Department, Jhelum of 2018-2019



Annexure-IV: Compensation Cost of Private Owned Non- Fruit Trees of ICB-P3

Sr. No.

(RD) Owner Location Khasra

No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

Main Canal

1 235+500 Allah Ditta, Fazlan etc Thathi 600 3 18000

2 235+600 Noor,Arshed etc Thathi 625 2 12000

3 235+850 Akram, Nazar etc Thathi 629 1 6000

4 236+000 Ammer Begum, Zafar etc Thathi 836,859 2 12000

5 236+500 Ramzan, Ejaz etc Thathi 891 1+1 Sapling 9000

6 238+500 M.Hussain, Asghar etc Saroba 2496,2494/2495 15+10 Sapling 120000

7 238+500 Aslam, Fazal karim etc Saroba 2508 3 18000

8 239+000 Abid, Akram etc Saroba 2278 3 18000

9 239+250 M.Hussain, Asghar etc Saroba 2284 2 12000

10 239+500 M.Ehsan s/o M. Sardar Saroba 2383 2 12000

11 239+600 Barkaat Ahmad s/o M.Bux Saroba 2277 4+6 Sapling 42000

12 241+150 Nawaz, Gh.Rasool,waqar etc Saroba 2125 2 12000

13 241+150 Anwer Begum, Kaneez Fatima Saroba 2112,2115 8+10 Sapling 78000

14 242+500 Hayat, M. Khan etc Saroba 2035 10 Sapling 30000

15 242+900 Iftkhar,M.Ali Raza etc Saroba 2034,2034/1 5+14 Sapling 72000

16 244+000 Abid Hussain, Akram etc Saroba 2011 4 24000

17 246+800 Sooba Khan s/o Raja Khan Saroba 1849,1853 7+ 4 Sapling 54000

18 248+900 Naveed s/o Hakeem M Waris Saroba 1820 2 12000

19 249+750 M. Hayat s/o M. Bux Saroba 1817 1 6000

20 249+750 Amna Bi d/o M.Bukhsh etc Athar 1623 3 18000

21 251+125 Yaqoob s/o Fateh Mohd etc Athar 1619 14+7 Sapling 105000

22 252+950 Ashraf s/o Ahmad Khan etc Athar 1473 3 18000

23 254+500 Ehasn s/o Ramzan etc Athar 1491 15 90000

24 255+000 Ghulam Fatima d/o Akram Athar 1427 20 Sapling 60000

25 256+100 Hayat Bi wd/o Naimat Khan etc Athar 814 4 24000

26 257+250 Fayaz s/o Dost Mohd etc Athar 839 8 48000

27 259+600 Hayat s/o Ramzan Athar 1101 20 120000

28 262+000 Imran Haider, Inayat etc

Ahmad

Abad

571,573 28 168000

29 264+500 Aslam s/o Imam Din etc

Ahmad

Abad 815 20 120000

30 266+000 Ejaz s/o Anar khan etc

Ahmad

Abad 65 7 42000

31 266+500 Hasan Askari s/o Ghulam Raza

Ahmad

Abad 65 2 12000

32 269+500 Sajadan d/o Ramoon etc Langar 1408 15 90000

33 270+000 Fatim d/o Ramoon etc Langar 1426/2 10 60000

34 274+250 Hayat s/o M.Din etc Langar 1291 12 72000

35 275+000 Ahmad khan s/o M.Din etc Langar 1290 25 150000

36 275+750 Abdul s/o sultan etc Langar 1171 25 150000

37 277+000 Munir,Ghulam Hussain etc Langer 1137, 1140 23 138000



Sr. No.


No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

38 277+800 Allah Din, M.Younas etc Lillah Guj 1046,1070,1047 6+45 sapling 171000

39 281+000 Allah Din, Ali Sher etc Lillah Guj 1479 3 18000

40 281+300 Gul M, Muhammad etc etc Lillah Guj 1475 4 24000

41 282+750 Ejaz, Raja etc Lillah

Bhera 1927 4+ 5 Sapling 39000

42 284+000 Ejaz, Anwer etc Lillah

Bhera 1925

11+ 24

Sapling 138000

43 284+600 M.Zaman etc Lillah

Bhera 1914 2 12000

44 286+500 Allah Bhx, Rehmat Bi etc Lillah

Bhera 1904

3+ 10

sapling 48000

45 287+750 Ali Haider, Ali Bux etc Bhera 1311 26+ 10 Sapling

186000

46 298+750 Hayat s/o Rattay Khan etc Jaithal 842 9 54000

47 299+000 Farhat Abbas etc Jaithal 848 20 120000

48 299+800 Sikander Khan etc Sikander Khan Jaithal 671,672 39 234000

49 300+100 Ibrahim s/0 Ameer etc Jaithal 677 5 30000

50 301+500 Akber s/o Laal etc Jaithal 687 1 6000

51 301+500 Gul Sher etc Jaithal 690 3+ 5 Sapling 33000

52 302+500 Akram s/o Afzal etc Jaithal 701 1 6000

53 302+850 Aslam s/o Akber etc Jaithal 584 3+ 15 Sapling 63000

54 303+000 Akber s/o Laal Khan etc Jaithal 581 11 66000

55 305+850 Asif Ali s/o M.Ali etc Jaithal 379 3 18000

56 306+000 Mushtaq Hussain s/o G.Shabbir Jaithal 381 4+ 3 Sapling 33000

57 306+750 M.Din s/o Khuda Bux etc Jaithal 395 1 6000

58 307+750 Bukhsh s/o Hayat etc Jaithal 418

35+ 20

sapling 270000

59 308+750 Ghulam M s/o Fazal etc Jaithal 415

33+ 30 Sapling

288000

60 309+350 Sakina d/o Sardar etc Jaithal 416 4 24000

61 311+300 Hakim, Ashraf etc Kandwal 4262 20 sapling 60000

62 315+750 Allah Bux, Malik Khan etc Kandwal 4513 40 240000

63 317+600 Allah Bux, Irshad etc Kandwal 2699 1 6000

64 320+000 Bashir, Pehlwan etc Kandwal 2712 1+ 15 Sapling 51000

65 320+100 Arif, Bahader etc Kandwal 2313 1 6000

66 320+600 Asghar, M.Yar etc Kandwal 2233 2 12000

67 320+800 Sabir, Kamran etc Kandwal 2234 1 6000

68 324+400 Ghaus M. Ghulam M etc Kandwal 2110 3 18000

69 324+800 Muzaffar Abbas, Sikander etc Kandwal 2107 2 + 2 Sapling 18000

70 325+300 Nawaz, Shafi etc Kandwal 2061 4+50 Sapling 174000

71 336+400

Gulzar, Iqbal etc Jaswal 662,663 3 18000

72 338+600 Ghulam M, khushi M etc Jaswal 525,526 4 24000

73 339+400 Akram , Noor etc Jaswal 538 1 6000



Sr. No.


No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

74 339+400 Ghulam Hussain, G.Qadir etc Jaswal 522 2 12000

75 341+500 Sahib khan , Fida Hussain etc Jaswal 549 10 60000

76 342+000 Khan M, M.Khan etc Jaswal 489 1 6000

77 342+100 Mehr Khan,Fateh M etc Jaswal 483 3 18000

78 343+000 Fakhar Abbas,Ulfat etc

Daiwal 3726,3729 8+175 Sapling

573000

79 344+600 Nawaz, Riaz etc Daiwal 3694 15 90000

80 346+000 Shehbaz, Akram etc Daiwal 3695 1 6000

81 346+750 Sattar, Mian Khan etc Daiwal 3688 1 6000

82 348+400 Gheba,Aziz etc Mangwal 511 2 12000

83 350+650 M.Hussain, Ahmad etc Mangwal 531 2 12000

84 356+050 Ahmad Khan, M.Aslam etc Mangwal 826 2 12000

85 357+000 Rajan Bi, M.Sadiq etc Daiwal 3853 3 18000

86 357+100 M.Khan , Anwer etc Daiwal 3860 5 30000

87 358+100 Hayat, M.Khan etc Mangwal 112 1 6000

88 359+350 Rajan d/o Sardar,Ali M etc Mangwal 87 6 36000

89 359+700 M.Khan , Mian Mohd etc Mangwal 86 1 6000

Total trees of Main Canal

684+511

Sr.No Chainage

/ (RD) Owner Location

Khasra/ Plot

No. No. of

Trees

Disty-14

90 5+400 Suleman s/o Raja etc Saroba 1187 1

91 7+780 Allah Din s/o Farman etc Saroba 1091 3

Disty-15

92 4+500 Javed Iqbal s/o M.Khan etc Athar 1260 1

Disty- 18

93 3+900 Mushtaq s/o Saparas etc Kandwal 4330 2

Disty- 18 Minor-1

94 5+000 Nazar Hussain s/o Allah Bux Kahana 1166 4

Disty- 23

95 0+750 Bhag Bhari wd/o Hayat etc Kurar 913 2

96 1+250 Sabir Hussain etc Kurar 862 2

97 4+000 Ghulam abbas s/o Hasn etc Kurar 836 1

98 6+650 Ghulam Haider s/o Mehdi et Kurar 580 1

99 7+000 Nawaz s/o Fateh etc Kurar 575 1

100 7+250 Ghulam Abbas s/o Muzaffar etc Kurar 589 1

101 7+750 Yousaf s/o Bhai Khan etc Kurar 603 2

102 9+000 Sattan Bi etc Kurar 276 9

103 9+000 Ghazanfar s/o Allah Ditta etc Kurar 275 1

104 11+750 Shafqat Hussain s/o Hussain Bux Kurar 255 1

105 13+100 Sher khan s/o Sanwal Khan etc Kurar 84 5

106 13+400 Ata M s/o Ali Mohd etc Kurar 73 1



Sr. No.


No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

107 13+600 Bhag Bhari wd/o Subhana etc Kurar 84 1

108 13+700 Allah Ditta s/o Fateh M etc Kurar 74,84 7

109 15+700 Fateh Khan s/o Khuda Bux etc Kurar 90,92,94 4

110 16+750 M.Shah s/o Ahmad Shah Kurar 94 3

111 19+100 Saleem Akhter d/o Haq Nawaz Katha 497,498 5

112 20+300 Falak Sher s/o Laal khan etc Katha 499 1

113 21+700 Bilal Haider s/o sikander etc Katha 625 2

114 22+500 M. Mumtaz s/o M. Khan Katha 735 4

115 51+750

Allah Ditta s/o Ghaus etc

Nalli

5031,4730,4731

4731,4733,4733

4734,4734

16+40

saplings

116 53+800

Ghulam Habib s/o Ghulam Jilani

etc Nalli 4654,4658 18 + 9

Sap11ing

117 55+100 Ashraf s/o Allah Wasaya etc Nalli 4655 4

118 56+250 Mumtaz s/o Nawaz etc Nalli 4652 7 + 7 Sapling

119 56+500 Mumtaz s/o Fateh khan etc Nalli 4598,4582 5

120 57+150 Mian Mohd s/o Alan etc Nalli 4599 3 + 5 Sapling

121 58+350 Gul Mohd s/o Sanwal etc Nalli 4513,4514 3

122 58+750 Dost M s/o Falak Sher etc Nalli 4610 1

123 59+350 Sher M s/o Ali Mohd etc Nalli 4506,4507 15

124 60+000 Nawaz s/o Kamal etc Nalli 4503 1

125 61+250 Muzaffar s/o Ahmad etc Nalli 4277,4280 11+20 sapling

Disty-23 Minor-1

126 15+100 M. Riaz s/o Sahib Khan Talokar 508 3 + 6 Sapling

127 15+750 Saee s/o Ahmad Khan etc Talokar 498 12 + 10

Sapling

128 18+600 Sher Muhammad s/o Rajan Talokar 564 1

129 19+000 Mian Khan s/o Noor Khan Talokar 254 12 + 10

Sapling

130 24+100 M. Khan Sadhwal s/o Sahib Khan Talokar 279 2 + 50 Sapling

Total Trees of Distys 172+157

Sr.No RD Owner Location Khasra/ Plot

No. No. of

Trees

FCC- 11

131 0+700 Begum Bi d/o Saif Ali etc Langer 419 4

132 0+800 Mulazam s/o Khadim Hussain etc Langer 430 1

133 2+100 Zafar Abbas s/o Ghulam Raza etc Langer 455 3 + 26 Saplimg

134 18+250 Sultan s/o M.Bukhsh Jandran 327 3 + 3 Sapling

135 18+300 Siddique s/o Dost Mohd etc Jandran 326 2

136 18+350 Siddique s/o M.Sharif etc Jandran 325 3

137 19+750 Khuda Bukhsh s/o M.Ali etc Jandran 364 40

138 20+000 M. Ameer s/o M. Hayyat Jandran 424 3

138 20+350 Afzal s/o Muhammad etc Jandran 420 2



Sr. No.


No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

140 20+630 Shamim s/o Jahana etc Jandran 415,418 3+36 Sapling

141 21+500 Sultan s/o Rehman etc Jandran 702 1

142 21+500 Zarina Bi d/o Lala etc Jandran 706,707,708 5

FCC- 12

143 23+400 Gul M s/o Qazi Dhok Noora 23/13 7

FCC- 13-2/3

144 4+200 Ghulam Bi d/o Gulla etc Kandwal 1942 2

FCC- 14-2/1

145 8+750 Sanwal Khan Daiwal 3561 1+3 Sapling

FCC- 16

146 0+000 Ghulam M. s/o Sher Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2452 2

147 0+750 Ismaeel s/o Ali Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2628 4

148 1+000 Hayat s/o Ata Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2629 5

149 1+500 Ghaus Mohd s/o Mian Mohd Nari

Shumali 2617 2

150 2+000 Yousaf s/o Sher Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2631 4

151 2+500 Dost Mohd s/o Mian Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2633 5

152 3+000 Malkan wd/o Abdul Majeed etc Nari

Shumali 2637 2

153 3+500 Mumtaz s/o Mian Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2836 8

154 4+500 Soban wd/o Ali etc Nari

Shumali 4189 8

155 6+000 Mian Mohd s/o Fatta etc Nari

Shumali 4197 2

FCC- 16-2

156 1+000 Ramzan s/o Ghaus etc Nari

Shumali 3132 2

157 1+400 Sardar Ali s/o Ghaus etc Nari

Shumali 3144 4

158 2+000 Mian M s/o Fateh Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 3149 3

159 2+600 Ghaus s/o Muzaffar etc Nari

Shumali 3534 4

160 2+900 Fateh Mohd s/o Ahmad Khan etc Nari

Shumali 3535 4

161 2+900 Shaheen wd/o Sawa etc Nari

Shumali 3533 4

162 4+750 Dost Mohd s/o Shahabal etc Nari

Shumali 2918 3

163 5+000 Sat Bhirai d/o Fateh Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2910 2

164 5+500 Gul Jahan s/o M. Ramzan etc Nari

Shumali 2902 4



Sr. No.


No. No. of

Trees

Total

Comp. Cost

165 6+500 Gul Sher s/o Mian Mohd etc Nari

Shumali 2889 4

FCC- 16-1/1

166

0+350 Nazar Hayat s/o M. Hayat etc

Katha

Sagral 661 3

167 2+000 Rub Nawaz s/o Bahadur Khan Katha

Sagral 652 1

168 2+250 Naeem s/o Allah Ditta etc Katha

Sagral 653 1

169 2+500 Allah Ditta s/o bahader Khan etc Katha

Sagral 656

10 + 200

Sapling

170 4+000 Sher Muhammad s/o Sultan Katha

Sagral 669 4+20 Sapling

171 5+000 Ghulam Haider s/o Sahib Khan Katha

Sagral 671 3

172 5+500 Safdar Hayyat s/o Muhammad

Hayyat

Katha

Sagral 676 5

Total Trees of FCCs

183+288

Grand total trees of MC+Distys & Fccs

1039+956 sapling= 1995 Compensation,Rs.Million= 9.10



Annexure-V: Government Trees of ICB-P3

Government Trees Under Project Impact of P3

Sr.No RD Department Location Khasra No. No. of Trees

1 240+400 Highway Saroba, Main Canal Missing 10

2 244+000 Govt. land Saroba 2013 1

3 272+000 Govt.land Saroba 1247 35+5 sapling

4 4+350 Railway Kandwal (Disty- 18) 4590 6

5 5+600 Railway Kandwal (Disty- 18) - 4

6 4+550 Shamlat Kanswal FCC-13/2/3 1942 2

Total

58+5 sapling



Annexure-VI: Public Fixtures (WAPDA POLES) and Compensation Cost

S.No RD/Location Nos.of Pole S.No RD/Location Nos.of Pole MAIN CANAL FCCs

1 228+150 1 13 FCC-11 RD 5+100 1

2 238+750 1 14 FCC-13/1 RD 6+100 1

3 249+400 4 15 FCC-13/1 RD 7+050 1

4 283+700 1 16 FCC 13/2 Kandwal 1

5 326+250 1

6 356+800 1 Distys (D)

7 D-14 RD 3+750 1

8 D-16 RD 8+850 1

9 D-17 RD 26+100 1

10 D-12 RD 28+600 1

11 D-23 RD 63+100 1

12 Total Poles 18 Total Compensation Amount @

Rs.30000 per pole Rs. 540000



Annexure-VII: List of Vulnerables for Additional Assistance under of ICB-P3

Sr. No.

Name Father Name Family

Size Occupation

Av. Monthly Income

(Rs.)

Vulnerability Allowance

(Rs.)

Main Canal. Mouza Saroba

1 Imtiaz Bibi Wd/o M.Iqbal 4 Supported by relatives - 52500

2 Malik Afsar Malik Khan 7 Agriculture 12000 52500

3 Malik Soba Khan Raja Khan 3 Pensioner 10000 52500

4 Maqsood Begum Wd/o Imtiaz 3 Pensioner 7000 52500

5 Awaiz-ul-Hasan Imtiaz Hussain 2 Pensioner 6000 52500

6 Ali Raza Zulfqar Ahmad 5 Supported by relatives - 52500

7 Dost Mohd Sattar Khan 3 Pensioner 10000 52500

8 Rasulan Bini Wd/o Gul Mohd 1 Pensioner 6000 52500

9 Khursheed Begum Wd/oNisar Ahmad 3 Pensioner 12000 52500

10 Zahoor Ahmad Sawa Khan 3 Pensioner 14000 52500

11 Karam Elahi Habib Khan 4 Agri. 10500 52500 Main Canal Mouza Thatti

12 Muhammad Khan Piran Bukhsh 6 Labor 8000 52500

13 Rasulan Bi Wd/o Imam Ali 1 No source - 52500 14 Munazam Khan M.Sultan 6 No source - 52500 15 Nizam Ali Abdul Sattar 5 Labor 5416 52500 16 Maqsood Bi d/o M.Aslam 1 No source - 52500 17 Kalsoom Bi Wd/oGhulam Akber 5 No source - 52500 18 Zarina Bi Wd/o M.Aslam 2 Labor 7000 52500 19 Anara Bi Wd/o M.Aslam 3 Livestock 6000 52500 20 Sher Bano Wd/o Ghulam 1 No source - 52500 21 Amna Bi d/o Allah Ditta 1 No source - 52500 22 Rehana Kausar d/o Khadija 1 No source - 52500

23 Amir Bano d/o Ali Mohd 1 No source - 52500

24 M.Bashir Allah Ditta 3 Labor 8700 52500 25 Abdur Rehman Mailhan Khan 9 Agri. 14083 52500

26 Ghulam Abbass M.Boota 5 Labor 13200 52500 Main Canal Mouza Lillah Guj

27 Khushi Mohd Panda Khan 7 Agri. 8000 52500 Disty-16 Mouza Malyar

28 M.Arshed M.Siddique 2 Pensioner 10000 52500

29 Fatima Wd/o Sardar Ali 2 Labor 10000 52500

30 Faiz Ahmad Dost Mohd 6 Agri. 13583 52500 FCC-15, D-23 Mouza Kurar

31 Ghulam Qamar Sultan Khan 3 Labor 11000 52500

32 Zahid Hussain Chan Khan 4 Labor 12750 52500

33 M.Khan Sahib Khan 2 Agri. 14750 52500

34 M.Nawaz Gul Mohd 1 Agri. 3300 52500

35 Farooq Abdul Khaliq 1 Tailor 10700 52500

36 Ameer Sahib Khan 5 Agri. 14100 52500 37 M.khan Sahib Khan 2 Retired 14750 52500 38 M.Ramzan Allah Ditta 2 Retired 11000 52500 39 M.Safeer Bhai Khan 1 Pvt. Job 10000 52500

FCC-11 Mouza Jandran

40 Safder Hussain Ghulam Mohd 3 Driver 11000 52500

41 Ahmad Khan Jahan Khan 1 Agri. 3500 52500

42 M.Afzal Ghulam Mohd 5 Agri. 11000 52500

43 Akhlaq Hussain Mehdi 6 Pvt.Job 13000 52500

44 Ameer Hayat M.Hayat 4 Pvt.Job 8000 52500

45 Zubaida d/o M.Hayat 1 No source - 52500



Sr. No.


Size Occupation

Av. Monthly Income

(Rs.)


(Rs.)

46 Fatima d/o Ismaeel 1 No source - 52500

47 Shahadat Ali Jahana 1 Agri. 3334 52500

48 Sultan Jahana 1 Agri. 3334 52500

49 Ismaeel Gulla 1 Agri. 5767 52500

50 Ilyas Raza Ghulam Mehdi 5 Service 14333 52500

51 M.Aslam Ahmad Din 4 Agri. 5000 52500

52 Masood Ahmad M.Sharif 6 Agri. 12833 52500 Main Canal Mouza Jaswal

53 Mehr Khan Sher mohd 3 Agri. 12000 52500

54 Sajadan bibi d/o Kher Mohd 5 Supported by reletives - 52500

55 Ameer Shahabal 1 Agri. 9000 52500

56 Naziran Bibi d/o Allah bukhsh 2 Agri. 12000 52500

57 M.Iqbal Noor Mohd 3 Agri. 8900 52500 Disty-20 Mouza Jaswal

58 Mian Mohd Sardar 2 No source - 52500

59 Ghaus Mohd Sardar 3 No source - 52500

60 Shareef Qadeer 6 Agri. 12000 52500 61 Sakina Bibi d/o Ghulam Mohd 5 Livestock 10000 52500

62 M.Aslam Ghulam Hussain 6 Labor 8000 52500

63 M.Khan Abdullah 1 Agri. 5000 52500

64 Khushi Mohd Ata Mohd 1 Agri. 5000 52500

65 Nazar Bibi d/o Allah Bukhsh 1 No source - 52500

66 Sher Mohd M.Khan 5 Labor 4000 52500

67 Ramzan Ditta 1 Agri. 5000 52500

68 Ghulam Abbass Ghulam Haider 7 Agri. 14000 52500

69 Mehr Bukhsh Sher Mohd 3 Agri. 11600 52500

70 Noor Mohd Mutalli 3 Agri. 13500 52500

71 M.Nawaz Faqir Mohd 7 Agri. 10000 52500

72 M.Ashraf Ghaus Mohd 8 Agri. 9916 52500

73 Ghulam Hussain Langer Khan 6 Agri. 11900 52500 FCC-13 Mouza Jaswal

74 Noor Mohd Nadir Khan 2 Pensioner 10000 52500

75 M.Nawaz Noor Mohd 11 Agri 12050 52500

76 Ramzan Elahi bukhsh 3 Labor 9667 52500

77 M.Feroze Zafar Khan 5 Agri. 10833 52500

78 Dost Mohd Sher Mohd 5 Labor 6000 52500

79 M.Hayat Bakhhu 1 No source - 52500

80 Umm-e-Kalsoom d/oGhulam Haider 1 No source - 52500

81 Ghulam Mohd Raja 4 Agri. 14000 52500

82 M.Hayat Jeewan 1 Support fro relatives - 52500

83 M.Arif Murtaza 2 Livestock 13800 52500

84 M.Riaz Ditta 4 Disabled - 52500

85 M.Aslam Ghulam Hassan 7 Agri. 13000 52500

86 Ghulam Mohd Noor Mohd 2 Agri. 10000 52500

87 Abdul Qadeer M.Shareef 3 Agri. 9000 52500

88 M.Saeed M.Shareef 3 Agri. 9000 52500

89 M.Ehsan Fateh Mohd 7 Agri. 14000 52500

90 M.Sultan Kher mohd 5 Support from relatives - 52500

91 Ahmad Yar Kher Mohd 3 Support from relatives - 52500

92 Ghulam Fatima Wd/o Hayat 3 Support from relatives - 52500

93 Shera Sardar Bux 3 Disabled - 52500

94 Ali Mohd Fateh Mohd 3 Agri. 12000 52500

95 M.Khan Abdullah 1 Agri. 12000 52500

96 Khushi Mohd Ata Mohd 1 No source - 52500



Sr. No.


Size Occupation

Av. Monthly Income

(Rs.)


(Rs.)

97 Ramzan Khushi Mohd 6 Agri. 10000 52500

98 Mehtab Bi d/o Noor Mohd 8 Labor 12000 52500

99 Fateh Mohd Qutab Din 5 Agri. 12000 52500

100 Mahmoor Hussain Kher Mohd 5 Agri. 10000 52500

101 Fateh Bi d/o Murad 3 Agri. 10000 52500

102 M.Nawaz Noor Mohd 4 Labor 12000 52500

103 Ghulam Akbar Boota 5 Labor 10000 52500

104 Sat Bharai d/o Khuda Bux 1 No source - 52500 FCC-14 Mouza Jaswal

105 Mohd Sher Murad 5 Agri.Labor 8000 52500

106 Manzooran d/o Fateh Mohd 5 Agri. Labor 8500 52500

107 Raj Bi d/oFaqir Mohd 5 Agri.Labor 7500 52500

108 Zadan d/o Murad 4 Agri.Labor 8000 52500

109 Sarwar Khnjar Khan 6 Agri. 10000 52500

110 M.Shafi M.Taj 8 Agri. 10000 52500

111 M.Siddique Taja 2 Agri. 8000 52500

112 Shumaila d/o Noor Mohd 4 House maid 5000 52500 FCC-14 Mouza Daiwal

113 M.Hayat Wali Mohd 6 Agri. 9000 52500

114 Iqrar Hussain Ghulam Hussain 6 Agri. 8000 52500

115 Hayat s/0 Ali mohd 3 Agri. 10950 52500

116 Sanwal Khan Boota Khan 2 Agri 10667 52500

117 M.Aslam Malik Hayat 7 Retired 14167 52500

118 Umer Hayat M.Afsar 2 Retired 12250 52500

119 Bivi M.Aslam 3 Housewife 14583 52500

120 Kaniz Fatima Mohd Khan 2 Agri. 1167 52500

121 GHulam Bi w/o Haswar Khan 4 Housewife 14500 52500 Disty-17 Rajsar

122 Samina d/o Maqsood Begum 5 Agri./Labor 12300 52500

123 Mudassar Abbass M.Ayub 2 Pvt.Job 15000 52500

124 Mutalli Khan Ali Mohd 3 No source - 52500

125 M.Arshed M.Yaqoob 3 Livestock 10500 52500

125 M.Hayat M.Ramzan 3 Pvt.Job 15000 52500

127 M.Aslam Ali Mohd 6 Pvt.Job 13750 52500

128 M.Altaf Ameer Khan 5 Pvt.Job 12500 52500

129 Khalid Mehmood Ameer Khan 5 Labor 10500 52500

130 M.Ameer M.Nawaz 4 Labor 11200 52500

131 Munawar Imam Din 4 Labor 11400 52500

132 Allah Ditta Fateh Ali 3 Agri. 5754 52500

133 M.Aslam Ali Mohd 6 Labor 12000 52500

134 M.Ayub Ali Mohd 7 Labor 13000 52500

135 Wali Ahmad Khan 1 By Family support - 52500

136 Munawar Bi d/o Ali 4 Agri. Labor 8000 52500

137 Munir Baz Khan 6 Labor 10000 52500

138 Bhai Wali 7 Labor 12000 52500

139 Yousaf Ali 1 No source - 52500

140 Fatima d/o Ali 6 Labor 9000 52500

141 M.Ashraf Ali 6 Pvt.Job 13000 52500

142 Mehtab Bi d/o Mehdi 2 Livestock 10000 52500

143 Ramzan Nawaz 6 Labor 10000 52500

144 M.Ansar M.Nawaz 2 Labor 8000 52500

145 M.Safder M.nawaz 4 Agri. 11300 52500 Disty-17 Jattu

146 M.Ashraf Dost Mohd 6 52500 12000 52500



Sr. No.


Size Occupation

Av. Monthly Income

(Rs.)


(Rs.)

147 RasoolBi Mehdi 2 52500 4000 52500

148 M.Yousaf M.Bukhsh 2 52500 8000 52500

149 Ghulam Abbass M.Bukhsh 6 52500 12000 52500

150 Perveen Akhter Ghulam Hussain 5 52500 14000 52500

151 Manzoor Hussain M.Bukhsh 4 52500 8000 52500

152 Alaan M.Bukhsh 3 52500 10000 52500

153 Bivi d/o Karim Bukhsh 2 52500 - 52500

154 Ghulam Mohd Noor Mohd 4 52500 10000 52500

155 Taj Bi d/o Sohnda 6 52500 12000 52500

156 M.Younas M.Bukhsh 7 52500 12000 52500

157 Raj Bi d/o Sohnda 3 52500 14000 52500

158 M.Farooq Sai Khan 6 52500 13000 52500

159 Sultan Ahmad Mutalli 2 52500 - 52500

160 Elahi Bi Wd/o Sai Khan 2 52500 14900 52500

161 Zafar Hussain M.bukhsh 5 52500 13300 52500

162 M.Mumtaz Ahmad 4 52500 10000 52500

163 Ghulam Aisha Wd/o Dost Mohd 1 52500 - 52500 164 M.Rafique Shah Wali Khan 3 52500 10000 52500

165 Ghulam Raza Haitam Khan 3 52500 11500 52500

166 M.Munawar Dost Mohd 2 52500 13500 52500 Disty-23 Katha Saghral

167 M.Nawaz Wali Mohd 6 Driver 13500 52500

168 Ata Mohd Mahi Khan 5 Labor 10000 52500

169 Haq Nawaz Jeewan Khan 9 Agri. 13000 52500

170 Farooq Ahmad Altaf Hussain 4 Pvt.Job 14500 52500

171 Shaukat Hayat Sikande Ali 4 Labor 12000 52500

172 Nazar Mohd Ghulam Mustafa 5 Labor 13000 52500

173 Memona Zafar w/o Raja Shahid 7 Housewife 10750 52500

174 Mehboob Jafar 6 Labor 5000 52500

175 Maqbool Jafar 5 Pvt. Job 13000 52500

176 Abdul Haseeb Raja Zafar 8 Agri. 11000 52500

177 Gulsheed Wd/o M.Sher 6 Labor 10000 52500 Disty-17 Meray

178 Rehana Kausar d/o Hayat 1 No source - 52500

179 Kalsom Begum d/o Hayat 1 No source - 52500

180 Kaneez Bibi wd/o Muhammad 7 Agri. 11500 52500 Disty-23 Talokar

181 Muzaffar Mehdi (late) 5 No source - 52500

182 Kausar Bi bi Ghulam Qadir 4 Labor 7000 52500

183 Ghulam Fatima d/o Sahib Khan 4 Labor 8000 52500

184 Ghulam Rasool Abdul Aziz 4 Labor 10000 52500

185 Fateh Khan Muzaffar Khan 8 Agri. 11300 52500 Disty-18-19 Kandwal 186 Ghulam Mohd Shahan 2 Agri. 5000 52500 187 Malkani Wd/o Sardar khan 2 Agri. 4000 52500

188 Hayat Bi d/o Falak Sher 6 Pension 10000 52500

189 Malkani Bi d/o M.Anwer 1 Supported by relatives 4000 52500

190 Munawaran d/o Raja Khan 2 Supported by relatives 5000 52500

191 M.Aslam M.Anwer 13 Agri. 13000 52500

192 Nazir Hussain Fateh Ali 8 Agri. Labor 10000 52500

193 M.Aslam Mohd Din 6 Agri. Labor 10000 52500

194 Resham Khan Anwer Khan 5 Agri. Labor 13000 52500



Sr. No.


Size Occupation

Av. Monthly Income

(Rs.)


(Rs.)

195 Khuda Bukhsh Fateh Sher 6 Agri. 11500 52500

196 Ghulam Fatima d/o Mohd Sher 2 Supported by relatives 5000 52500

197 Reshan Khan Sain Mohd 2 Agri. 10500 52500

198 M.Bashir Sher Mohd 3 Agri. 9000 52500

199 M. Fayaz Allah Bukhsh 6 Agri. 10226 52500 Main Canal Mouza Ather

200 M.Khan Gulzar Ahmad 1 Agri. 917 52500 Main Canal Mouza Langer

201 Kausar Perveen d/o Manzoor 2 Agri. 13100 52500

202 Manzoor Hussain Ghulam Rasool 6 Agri. 14350 52500

203 Mohd Hussain Ghulam Rasool 5 Agri. 14350 52500

204 Mohd Aslam Charagh Din 2 Agri. 10609 52500 Main Canal Mouza Jaithal

205 Ghulam Sughran Wd/o M. Yaqoob 6 Maid 4167 52500

206 Sabir Hussain Munawar Khan 6 Agri. 13334 52500

207 Noor Ahmad Fazal 3 Agri. 12800 52500 Main Canal Mouza Lillah Bhera 208 M. Iqbal Wali Mohd 5 Agri. 13333 52500

209 Nazim Khan Wali Mohd 2 Agri. 6300 52500 Disty-17 Lillah Hindwana

210 Ghulam Hussain Ali Sher 3 Agri. 8800 52500

211 Sher Mohd Chaudhry 4 Agri. 8300 52500

212 Rasool Bi d/o Ghulam M 4 Agri. 7750 52500

213 M.Yaseen Fateh Mohd 3 Labor 11000 52500 Disty-23 Mouza Nalli Shumali, Khushab

214 Hafiz Noor Mohd Ghulam Mohd 2 Agri. 7916 52500

215 Umer Draz M. Mumtaz 4 Agri. 7583 52500 Disty-23,FCC-16/1 Mouza Talokar

216 Bahadur Khan Fteh Mohd 2 Retired 13542 52500

217 Ameer Sher Khan 7 Agri. 11500 52500

218 Sahib Khan Mehdi Khan 2 Agri. 13000 52500

219 Nazir Ahmad Bahader =Khan 9 Agri. 13000 52500

220 Naseer Ahmad Bahader Khan 4 Retired 14000 52500

221 Sultan Khan Nawab Khan 7 Agri. 9750 52500 Main Canal Mouza Mangwal

222 Mumtaz Baz Khan 5 Agri. 8950 52500

223 Ata Mohd Dost Mohd 5 Livestock 9333 52500

224 Sajid Iqbal Haji M. Iqbal 4 Shopkeeper 12000 52500

225 Raj Bibi wd/o M.Sultan 4 Housewife 10100 52500

226 Ghulam Rasool Mian Mohd 3 Retired 14000 52500

227 Haji Iqbal Mian Mohd 2 Relatives support - 52500

228 Ghaus Mohd Ghulam Mohd 3 Agri. 10000 52500

FCC-14 Mouza Dhaak

229 Sana Ullah Khan Mehboob Elahi 4 Agri. 14300 52500

230 Ghaus Mohd (late) Ali Mohd 2 Agri. 14600 52500 Disty-23 Mouza Nari Shumali, Khushab

231 Nazar Hayat Ali Mohd 2 Agri. 8083 52500

232 M.Arshed Fateh Khan 6 Agri. 12833 52500 233 Mohd Yousaf Mohd Ali 6 Agri. 11667 52500 234 Mohd Naeem Mohd Nawaz 4 Agri. 10833 52500 235 Dara Khan Dost Mohd 4 Agri. 10866 52500 236 Sanwal Khan Sultan Khan 9 Agri. 12334 52500

Total Vulnerable DPs= 236& Allownace (Rs.) Rs.12.39 Million) 1,23,90,000



*The highlighted 34 names (DPs) are not registered in revenue record, but these vulnerable are actual cultivators

and owners of land and their income is below OPL verified by the village Chairman/ Numberdar etc .



Annexure-VIII: List of Severely Affected DPs under of ICB-P3

S.No Name of DP Father’s Name Location Severity

Allowance(Rs.)

1 Muhammad Younas Mohd Afzal Malyar 39515

2 M.Bukhsh Sher Khuda Bukhsh Malyar 39515

3 M.Ashraf Shah Wali Malyar 25889

4 Ameer Mukhtar Ghulam Haidert Malyar 24867

5 Mohd Afzal Ghulam Haidert Malyar 24867

6 Irshad Begum d/o Raja Malyar 36449

7 Fazlan Bi d/o Raja Malyar 36449

8 Kaneez Fatima d/o Raja Malyar 36449

9 Sardar Ali Ghaus Mohd Nari Shumali 25889

10 Mohd Ramzan Ghaus Mohd Nari Shumali 25889

11 Rafaqat Jabbar Abdul Jabbar Nari Shumali 67789

12 Ghulam Mohd Ali Nalli Shumali 39515

13 Ameer Mian Mohd Nalli Shumali 30318

14 Sher Baz Mian Mohd Nalli Shumali 26571

15 M.Nawaz Mian Mohd Nalli Shumali 35428

16 Sher Mohd Fateh Mohd Nalli Shumali 46328

17 Mohd Iqbal Mohd Nawaz Nalli Shumali 24050

18 Laal Khan Khan Mohd Nalli Shumali 24527

19 Fateh Sher Saif Ali Nalli Shumali 24527

20 Bahader Khan Sardar Ali Nalli Shumali 24867

21 Ghulam Habib Ghulam jilani Nalli Shumali 20780

22 Ghulam Fareed Ghulam jilani Nalli Shumali 20780 23 Abdul Majeed Ghulam jilani Nalli Shumali 20780 24 Abdul Rasheed Ghulam jilani Nalli Shumali 20780 25 Ghulam Jilani Raja Nalli Shumali 22483

26 Gul Mohd Sial Mohd Nalli Shumali 26230

27 Fateh Din Fazal din Dhaak 23914

28 Jannat Bi d/o Baadshah Dhaak 33043

29 Sahibzadi Wd/o Sahib Khan Dhaak 30318

30 M.Ameer Sahib Khan Dhaak 211544

31 Hayat Bi Wd/o Fateh Ali Dhaak 21807

32 M.Sultan s/o Fateh Ali Dhaak 50416

33 M.Hayat s/o Fateh ali Dhaak 50416

34 M.Ramzan Fateh Ali Dhaak 50416

35 Sahibzada K.A.K Afridi Mansab Ali Dhaak 273201

36 M.Hasan Farhat Abbass Dhaak 179863

37 M.Hussain Wali Mohd Dhaak 154996

38 M.Mumtaz Ghulam Hussain Dhaak 154996 39 M.Iqbal Ghulam Hussain Dhaak 154996

40 M.Asghar Rab Nawaz Dhaak 22483

41 M.Afzal Rab Nawaz Dhaak 22483

42 M.Ashraf Rab Nawaz Dhaak 22483

43 M.Akram Rab Nawaz Dhaak 22483

44 Mudassar Rab Nawaz Dhaak 22483

45 Bhal Khan Sultan Ahmad Dhaak 31203

46 Ghulam Mohd Sultan Ahmad Dhaak 31203

47 Rab Nawaz Mohd Nawaz Dhaak 22142

48 Faryad Shah Walayat Shah Mandaher 23505

Total Severe Impact Compensation Cost 23,77,398



Annexure-IX: Photographs of 02 DPs’ Residential Structures Under Project Impact of ICB-P3

Sitting Room( Bethak) under Project Impact on FCC-9/1 Bhelowal Mouza of P3

Project Impacted Rooms under Construction on FCC-9/1 Bhelowal Mouza of P3



Annexure-X: Photographs of Meetings& Field Visits of Project Officials and Local Government Authorities

PD & PM briefing to DC Jhelum about the Project in the Field Social Safeguards Specialist briefing to DC and ADC(Revenure) about the land to be acquired for JIP

AC Pind Daden Khan/ Head LAC JIP visiting Projecr Area

Project Director JIP breifing to DC and the Commissioner

ADB Mission held meeting with AC/ Head, LAC JIP

Project Manager with Public Health Engineers visiting PID colony



Annexure-XI: Six Steps for Preparation of DPs List by the JIP Revenue Satff

1- As per design, land is identifying on Ux shajra ( Lathha)

2- Demarcation of ROW and center line of canal 3- Preparation of map with the help of patwari Lathha

4- Mapping showing canal route and land to be acquired

5- With the help of map, field book is prepared 6- With the help of field book, list of DPs is prepared



Annexure-XII: Photographs of Consultations with DPs at Various Locations of Canal, Dstys and FCCs of ICB-P3



Annexure (Conti): Photographs of Socio-economic Interviews at Various Locations of Canal, Dstys and FCCs of ICB-P3



Annexure-XIII: Photographs of Gender Survey and Consultations during Draft LARP (2017)andFinal LARP of P3 (2019)

Year 2017



2019

Gender Consultation in Thatti Mouza (Village) Gender Consultation in Saroba Mouza

Gender Consultation in Ather Mouza

Gender Consultation in Nari Shumali Village

Gender Consultation in Jaithal Village Gender Consultation in Kandwal Village



Gender Consultation in Lillah Bhera Mouza

Gender Consultation in Daiwal Mouza

Gender Consultation in Mangwal Mouza

Gender Consultation in Jaswal Mouza

Gender Consultation in Jandran Mouza

Gender Consultation in Jattu Mouza



Annexure-XIV: Focus Group Discussions



Annexure-XV: COMMUNITY CONSULTATION



Annexure-XVI: Verified Scanned Copies of Vulnerable DPs of ICB-P3



Annexure-XVII:Local Market Rates of Tubewells Installation



Annexure-XVIII:Local Market Rate of Water Pipe Used for Irrigation



Annexure-XIX: Notofication of Rate of Forest Trees, Govt. of the Punjab



Rate of 500 Forest Trees as Forest Department



Annexure-XX:Land Price Notification of Main Canal & Distys. Jhelum



Annexure-XX:Land Price Notification of DPAC, Khushab (held on 21-9-2019)



Annexure-XX (Conti): Land Price Notification of DPAC, Khushab



Annexure-XXI:Agri.Commodity Rates of Local Grain Market, PD Khan

46528-002: Jalalpur Irrigation Project - Asian Development Bank

Documents

Transcript of 46528-002: Jalalpur Irrigation Project - Asian Development Bank