2014 Elements of Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts
Transcript of 2014 Elements of Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts
| Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Studies |
Volume 2
series editors
zoltán csabai
department of ancient history
and
tibor grüll
department of ancient history
the university of pécs, hungary – l’harmattan hungary
Studies in Economic and Social History of the Ancient Near East in Memory of Péter Vargyas
edited by: zoltán csabai
Department of Ancient History, The University of Pécsl’harmattan, budapest
2014
Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Studies
edited by Zoltán Csabai and Tibor Grüll
Volume 2
Supporters:
The University of Pécs
The Hungarian Society for Ancient Studies.
The editorial work was supported by the European Union and the State
of Hungary, co-fi nanced by the European Social Fund in the framework of
TÁMOP-4.2.4.A/ 2-11/1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’.
© Authors, 2014
© Zoltán Csabai, 2014
© L’Harmattan, 2014
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrival system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – for example,
electronic, photocopy, recording – without the prior written permission of
the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews.
Table of Contents
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
In memory of Péter Vargyas (1950–2009)
László Török . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Publications of Péter Vargyas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
PART ONE
THIRD AND SECOND MILLENNIUM B.C.
Le prix de rachat des captifs d’après les archives paléo-babyloniennes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Dominique Charpin
Les problèmes économiques d’un sheich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Jean-Marie Durand
On Old Babylonian Palastgeschäft in Larsa. The meaning of sūtum
and the ‘circulation’ of silver in state/private business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Zsombor Földi
The Sumerian verb �ug̃ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119Szilvia Jáka-Sövegjártó
Große „private“ Haushalte in der altbabylonischen Zeit in
der Mittlerrolle zwischen Königtum und Untertanen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Gábor Kalla
From Agade to Samaria: The Infl ationary Price of Barley in Situations of Famine . . . . . . 167
Jacob Klein
8 • Table of Contents
Les clauses en tukum-bi dans les textes de prêt de l’époque d’Ur III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
Bertrand Lafont
Le rôle économique des dattes dans l’Égypte du Nouvel Empire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
Bernadette Menu
Some questions of prices, metals and money in „Old Assyriology” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Zoltán Pálfi
From Counting to Writing: The Quest for Abstraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
Denise Schmandt-Besserat
Aspekte einer Sozialgeschichte der spätfrühdynastischen Zeit. Das Beispiel Lagas,
oder: „The inhabited ghosts of our intellectual ancestors” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
Gebhard J. Selz
Eighteen Cuneiform Inscriptions from the Ur III and Old-Babylonian Periods . . . . . . . . 283
Marcel Sigrist and Uri Gabbay
Alašian products in Hittite sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Itamar Singer (Z’’L) and Graciela Gestoso Singer
Zulapi – eine Grossmacht im spätbronzezeitlichen Syrien? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
Béla Stipich
The semantics of verbal plurality in Sumerian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
Bálint Tanos
Silver in Old Assyrian Trade. Shapes, Qualities and Purifi cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393
Klaas R. Veenhof
Understanding Economic Growth: The Importance of Money
in Economic History and Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423
David A. Warburton
Table of Contents • 9
PART TWO
FIRST MILLENNIUM B.C.
Jenseits der assyrischen Grenze. Das Bild des Feindes in
den neuassyrischen Königsinschriften . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
Tamás K. Árvai
Interpretation of a medical commentary text BAM 401 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
András Bácskay
Elements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
Attila Buhály
Did Seleucid kings impose payments made only in fresh coins
of their own coinages? Units of account, not real coins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531
François de Callataÿ
The Economic Determination of the Changing Interests. A Survey Based on
the Loan Documents of the Neo-Babylonian Sîn-uballi/ Archive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557
Henrietta Cseke
Documentary Evidence on Wine from the Eanna Temple Archives in Uruk . . . . . . . . . 579
Muhammad A. Dandamayev
Babyloniaca from Qumran – Mesopotamian lore in Qumran Aramaic texts . . . . . . . . . 587
Ida Fröhlich
Les marchands mésopotamiens et la théorie des jeux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603
Laetitia Graslin-Thomé
Expositio totius mundi et gentium. A peculiar work on the commerce of Roman Empire
from the mid-fourth century – compiled by a Syrian textile dealer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 629
Tibor Grüll
Die datio in solutum in neubabylonischer Zeit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 643
Alessandro Hirata
A Late Babylonian Astrological Tablet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 657
Hermann Hunger
10 • Table of Contents
Neues zur Verwendung von mah˘
ir im Eanna-Archiv eine Anomalie? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671
Bojana Janković und Michaela Weszeli
Spätbabylonische Sklavenpreise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
Joachim Oelsner
A Sasanian taxation list or an Early Islamic booty? A Medieval Persian source
and the Sasanian taxation system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 701
Miklós Sárközy
Remarks on the Anatolian Background of the Tel Re�ov Bees and
the Historical Geography of the Luwian States in the 10th c. BC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715
Zsolt Simon
Greeks on Phoenicians. Can we rely on what the Greeks have said? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 739
László Vilmos
Double Family Names in Neo-Babylonian Records: The Case of the Ē iru
and ¡ābi�u Families and Their Butchers’ Prebends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751
Cornelia Wunsch
Neo-Assyrian kārus in the Zagros . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 789
Ádám Vér
Chronologische Aspekte der babylonischen Zinsen in der frühneubabylonischen
und neubabylonischen Zeit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811
Zoltán Csabai
Databasing the Commodity Chits of the Idumean Ostraca . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825
Bezalel Porten
Foreword
Family, friends, colleagues and all those who knew them stood bereft of speech following the deaths of Péter Vargyas and Éva Darvas, and were trying to make sense of the personal tragedy of these two wonderful people, looking for ways to alleviate the pain their absence had caused. It was only several months later that we realized the irretrievable loss Hungarian Assyriology had suff ered. Péter Vargyas had been the fi rst and until today only Doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences within the discipline, whose excellence was acknowledged by both the domestic and the international scholarly community. We had been robbed of a scientist with a number of friends in the fi eld, with formidable international experience, and a wide range of connections in the discipline all over the world.
He was a charismatic fi gure of Hungarian Assyriology, who prioritized the quality and the far-reaching, valuable results of research. He always underlined the researcher’s objectivity, and stressed the equality of the participants of a debate. This is the attitude that students at university, and young scholars at domestic academic programs could learn from him, and this won him recognition outside Hungary, as his numerous invitations to international events testify. He intended to use the innovative experiences gathered during his study trips abroad in Hungary as well, but these intentions were sadly not always well-received. The two decades spent at two major Hungarian universities nevertheless have left their mark. The Department of Ancient History at the University of Pécs will attempt to carry on this scholarly and spiritual legacy.
Three research topics stood out from the diverse fi elds that Péter Vargyas’s work touched upon. These were the society and economy of Ugarit, the history of Babylonian prices, and the monetary history of the Ancient Near East. When we fi rst contemplated producing a memorial volume in honour of his scholarly work, these were the areas
12 • Foreword
that came to mind, so we asked the authors to choose their essay topics, if possible, within the broader area of Ancient Near Eastern economic and social history. We hope we have succeeded in assembling a volume that refl ects adequately on Péter Vargyas’ scholarly career.
We would like to thank all the authors of the essays dedicated to the memory of Péter Vargyas, who accepted our call and enriched these volumes with their contributions. We are especially grateful for the patience they displayed during the prolonged editing process. Sadly two of our collaborators could not live to see the publication of the volumes. We learned with great sadness of the death of Itamar Singer in 2012, who repeatedly expressed his support for our eff orts, and always off ered us words of encouragement when we needed them most. It is also with great sorrow that we were informed of the passing of János Everling in spring 2013, who was an exceptionally talented former student of Péter Vargyas.
The participants, apart from the friends and colleagues of Péter Vargyas, also include former students who now work at various Hungarian universities: Henrietta Cseke (Kodolányi János University of Applied Sciences), András Bácskay (Pázmány Péter Catholic University), Miklós Sárközy (Károli Gáspár University of the Hungarian Reformed Church), and the editor of this volume (University of Pécs). He also supported and encouraged several young talents, beginning in the 1980s, many of whom are today internationally known academics in the fi eld of Assyriology.
There is not enough space to thank all the supporters and helpers who facilitated our work, yet we would like to express our gratitude to Ádám Vér and Vera Benczik for their continual assistance. We would also like to extend our thanks to Bálint Tanos, who in the autumn of 2012 substantially contributed to the editorial and pre-printing work of the fi rst volume. I would like to thank Péter Vargyas’ brother, Gábor Vargyas for his patience and the support he off ered for our work in the past more than two years. Finally I would like to extend my thanks to L’Harmattan Hungary Publishers for accepting the work into their Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Studies series, and for facilitating the publication process with off ering us their infrastructure.
Z. Cs.
Abbreviations
Abbreviated titles of editions of cuneiform texts and of assyriological journals are those used in the Chicago Assyrian Dictionary, but note:
AAAH Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
ABAW NF Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Neue Folge
ADFU Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka
AfO Archiv für Orientforschung
AHw Wolfram von Soden: Akkadisches Handwörterbuch. 1–3 Bände. Wiesbaden, 1965–1981.
AJA American Journal of Archaeology
AJSL American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures
ALASPM Abhandlungen zur Literatur Alt-Syrien-Palästinas und Mesopotamiens
AMI Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran
ANEMS Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Studies
ANESS Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement
AnOr Analecta Orientalia
AnSt Anatolian Studies
AOAT Alter Orient und Altes Testament
AoF Altorientalische Forschungen
ArOr Archiv Orientální
ARM Archives Royales de Mari
AS Assyriological Studies
ASAE Annales du service des antiquités de l’Égypte
ASSF Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae
26 • Studies in Social and Economic History of the Ancient Near East
AUWE Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka Endberichte
BA Beiträge zur Assyriologie
BabAr Babylonische Archive
BBVO Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient
BIN Babylonian Inscriptions in the Collection of James B. Nies
BiOr Bibliotheca Orientalis
BaM Baghdader Mitteilungen
BM cuneiform tablets in the collection of the British Museum, London
BPOA Biblioteca del Próximo Oriente Antiguo
BRM Babylonian records in the Library of J. Pierpont Morgan
CAD The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago,
1956–2010.
CDA Black, J. – George, A. – Postgate, N. 2000: A Concise Dictionary of Akkadian,
Wiesbaden.
CDOG Colloquien der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft
CHANE Culture and History of the Ancient Near East
CHD The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago 1989–
CM Cuneiform Monographs
CT Cuneiform Texts from Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum
CTH Laroche, E. 1971: Catalogue des textes hittites. Paris.
CTN Cuneiform Texts from Nimrud
CUA cuneiform tablets in the collection of the Catholic University of America
DMOA Documenta et Monumenta Orientis Antiqui
DTC Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
EAH Entretiens d’Archéologie et d’Histoire
ePSD Electronic version of the Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary. http://psd.museum.
upenn.edu/epsd/index.html
FAOS Freiburger Altorientalische Studien
GMTR Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record
HANES History of the Ancient Near East, Studies
HdO Handbuch der Orientalistik
HSAO Heidelberger Studien zum Alten Orient
IBoT Istanbul Arkeoloji Müzelerinde Bulunan Boğazköy Tabletleri
IEJ Israel Exploration Journal
ISCANEE International Scholars Conference on Ancient Near Eastern Economies
JA Journal Asiatique
Abbreviations • 27
JAC Journal of Ancient Civilizations
JAOS Journal of the American Oriental Society
JBL Journal of Biblical Literature
JCS Journal of Cuneiform Studies
JEA The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
JESHO Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient
JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies
JRAS Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society
KUB Keilschrifturkunden aus Boghazköi
KBo Keilschrifttexte aus Boghazköi, 1916–
Kt Sigla of texts from Kültepe (kt) found in kārum Kaniš
LAOS Leipziger Altorientalistische Studien
LAPO Littératures Anciennes du Proche-Orient
LD Lepsius, K.R. Denkmäler aus Ägypten und Äthiopien, 12 vols. Berlin. 1849–1859
MBAH Münstersche Beiträge zur Antiken Handelsgeschichte
MC Mesopotamian Civilization
MDOG Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft
MEFRA Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Antiquité
MSL Materialien zum sumerischen Lexikon; Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon
MVAEG Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatisch-Aegyptischen Gesellschaft
MVN Materiali per il vocabolario neo-sumerico
NABU Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires
NEA Near Eastern Archaeology
Nisaba Studi Assiriologici Messinesi
OAA Old Assyrian Archives
OBO Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis
OECT Oxford Editions of Cuneiform Texts
OIP Oriental Institute Publications
OIS Oriental Institute Seminars
OJA Oxford Journal of Archaeology
OLA Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta
OLZ Orientalistische Literaturzeitung
OrSP Orientalia Series Prior
ÓTI Ókor-Történet-Írás
PBS Publications of the Babylonian Section, The Museum of the Unviersity of
Pennsylvania
28 • Studies in Social and Economic History of the Ancient Near East
PIHANS Publications de l’Institut historique et archéologique néerlandais de Stamboul
PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
PSBA Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology
RA Revue d’Assyriologie et d’Archéologie Orientale
RB Revue Biblique
RdE Revue d’Égyptologie
RGTC Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiformes
RIMA The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia. Assyrian Periods
RIMB The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia. Babylonian Periods
RIME The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods
RINAP The Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period
RLA Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie. Begründet von E. Ebeling
und B. Meissner, fortgeführt von E. Wiedner, W. von Soden und D. O. Edzard,
herausgegeben von M. P. Streck, München, 1928–
ROMCT Royal Ontario Museum Cuneiform Texts
SAA State Archives of Assyria
SAAB State Archives of Assyria Bulletin
SAAS State Archives of Assyria Studies
SAK Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur
SCCNH Studies on the Civilization and Culture of Nuzi and the Hurrians
SD Studia et Documenta ad Iura Orientis Antiqui Pertinentia
SMEA Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici
StBOT Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten
TCL Textes cunéiformes du Louvre
TCS Texts from Cuneiform Sources
THeth Texte der Hethiter
TIM Texts in the Iraq Museum
TMH Texte und Materialien der Frau Professor Hilprecht Collection
UAVA Untersuchungen zur Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie.
Ergänzungsbände zu Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasitische Archäologie
UCP University of California Publications in Semitic Philology
UET Ur Excavations Texts
VS Vorderasiatische Schriftsdenkmäler
WAW Writings from Ancient World
WdO Die Welt des Orients
WOO Wiener Off ene Orientalistik
Abbreviations • 29
WVDOG Wissenschaftliche Veröff entlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft
YBC cuneiform tablets in the Yale Babylonian Collection
YOS Yale Oriental Series, Babylonian Texts
ZA Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie
ZAR Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte
ZÄS Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde
ZDPV Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins
ZDMG Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft
ZSSR Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte
E lements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts
ATTILA BUHÁLY
College of Nyíregyháza
Urartian rulers regularly made several stele- or rock inscriptions both in their homeland and in conquered territories. The style of these inscriptions has frequently been studied and systematized, but without fi nal conclusions.1 Our goal is now to study in these inscriptions how the royal propaganda, the legalization of the facts of domination and conquest referred either to particular rulers or general symbolic components of royal representations. During the study, we were curious mostly about the next topics:
– Are there any diff erencies in time or place in the inscriptions?– If there are, what could be the reasons for them? According to the Ancient Near East, Joan Westenholz classifi ed the iconographic
and epigraphic components of royal representations in her last work as follows:2
– according to the iconographic representations of kings, the pose of the represented king, his body language;
– the representations and/or descriptions of enemies;– the representation of a bow as the king’s weapon;– appearance of astral symbols;– representations and/or descriptions of enemies as rebellious people;– fi ght with beast; hunting scenes;– representations and/or descriptions of extraordinally exploits or adventorous
actions.Westenholz illustrated the existence of these components from the Accadian king,
Naram-Sin through Assyrian kings to the Persian Darius I, emphasizing that the king’s personality, his royal life circle: birth, his selections by the god(s), inauguration, and
1 See for example Zimansky 1985. About history and culture of Urartu: Salvini 1995.2 Westenholz 2000.
522 • Attila Buhály
perhaps his death play extraordinary role in the emergence of an empire in the Ancient Near East. The king is always a hero loved by god(s), the protector of the divine world order, both on the epigraphic and iconographic material. These mostly iconographic representations are further kinds of channels of communication in illiteral times or areas.3
It is a well known fact that during the emergence of the Urartian state in the age of Sarduri I (ca. 835–825 BC), the new power copied lots of Mesopotamian, especially Assyrian pattern; for example, the inscriptions of Sarduri I were made in Assyrian and they adopted the Neo-Assyrian version of cuneiform writing.4 On the other hand, typical Urartian phenomenon is the almost full lack of iconographic representations connected with representations of power; the stele and rock inscriptions are presenting the acts, authority and commands of kings with the abstract sign of the Mesopotamian cuneiform writing. It’s quite strange at fi rst sight, because the pictoral and iconographical representations for the representing of power seems to be more practical than plain texts. For the solution of this contradiction, perhaps the local or contemporary context of literacy, the contemporary role of rock- and stele inscriptions as „media” could be studied.5
Nevertheless, according to the epigraphic material, there are lots of passages that fi t in the viewpoints collected by Westenholz. First of all, let we off er a brief survey of inscriptions which are relevant for showing of royal representations.
According to this view, we could take apart the epigraphic material into the next groups:
– Votiv objects; secular objects off ered by kings for gods (esp. Haldi): mostly weapons, shields, and short texts on them, declared the fact of off ering;
– Inscriptions like „res gestae” of Argišti I (cca. 790–760 BC) and Sarduri II (760–734 BC) in Vankale: here there seem to be an obvious royal propaganda aimed inwards as supplements of a rock tomb (Argišti I, Horhor) or a memorial (Sarduri II,Hazine Kapısı). (There will be mentioned further simplifi ed as chronicles of the given king.)
– There are signifi cant documents of the royal ideology the stelea of Kelišin and Topzawa; Both inscriptions may attest to importance of Ardini/Muoaoir considering the legitimation and inauguration of kings.
– Phrases of isolated rock inscriptions.
3 Westenholz 2000: 100, 103.4 Wilhelm 1986: 95ff .5 The role of writing systems and literacy in ancient societies: Houston 2004.
Elements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts • 523
This last type is important therefore the Urartian kings regularly erected stelea and rock inscriptions during their several campaign in conquered territories. The goal of these inscriptions were obviously declaring the fact of conquest; it meant a direct or indirect way of the royal representation. In the next paragraph we can have a closer look of Westenholz’s viewpoint, namely what kinds of elements of royal power’s declaration appear in the epigraphic material:
– descriptions of rebellious enemies;– parts of the king’s life cycle: choosen by gods, inauguration; the king as a hero
loved by god(s);– some kind of divine weapon;– extraordinally exploits or adventurous actions;– changing any elements of Westenholz’s viewpoint – the bipolar opposition of
„abandoned” vs. „civilized”.
DESCRIPTIONS OF REBELLIOUS ENEMIES
The determined defi nition of conqered lands and territories as rebellious is surprisingly quite rare. It appears defi nitely in an inscription in Patnos in the reign of Minua (thus in relatively early):
(1) „...(5) Through the might of Haldi, through the word of Haldi (6) Minua, son of Išpuini, (7) when he sat down on (his) father’s throne, Šatiru (8) revolted (du-ur-
ba-i-e ma-nu). Haldi set off , his (9) spear (set off )... (10) ...defeated (11) the land of Šatiru (…) (22) ...In the same year Alze revolted (du-ur-ba-i-e ma-nu): (23) Haldi set off ; Minua, son of Išpuini (24) ...conquered Alze...” (KUKN 148 5-11, 22-24)
Because the original Urartian word „revolted” (durb-)6 is hapax in the whole text corpus, our suggestions are strongly hypothetical. But the verb „to occupy” (kar-)7 is well attested in the second part of the phrase, so durb- would mean an opposite of this, a status of Šatiruans and Alzeans before the Urartian campaign (perhaps „turbulent, resistant”).
6 KUKN: (Šebitu and/or Alze) „восставшей была”; „восставать, быть мятежым” (Djakonov 1963: 88); „дейстовать враждевно, восставать” (Chačikjan 1985: 46); Balkan: „...war ein Aufstand” (Balkan 1960: 116; also HchI p.180; Melikišvili 1971: 81). See Hurrian tur-(u)b- (Djakonov 1963: 88); tur(u)bi „enemy” (Laroche 1980: 274); turub2 „враг” (Chačikjan 1985: 46)
7 „heimsuchen, bezwingen” (HchI: 190); „покорить, подчинить” (Djakonov 1963: 90); „besiegen, überwaltigen” (Melikišvili 1971: 84)
524 • Attila Buhály
THE PASSAGE OF „CHOOSEN BY GODS” AND INAUGURATION
This passage, as we have seen, appears in the sentence above as well. In the case of the inscriptions of Minua’s reign, it seems to be an exception, and his role is just to suggest that Minua had to conquer this two land, Šatiru and Alze, just after his inauguration.
It’s remarkable that this passage appears repeatedly in the late epigraphic material:
– In the fi rst part of Argišti I’s chronicle:
(2) „...Haldi has given the kingship to Argišti, son of Minua, (he) sat down on (his) father’s throne...” (KUKN 174 A3: 17-19)
– During the reign of Sarduri II: • In a similar part of his chronicle (KUKN 241 G: 2; 242 A II+A I: 26-27).• In the inscription of a shrine erected by him in Çavuştepe:
(3) „Sarduri, son of Argišti [have built] this sanctuary for Irmušini […] when (he) sat down on (his) father’s throne...” (KUKN 247: 1-2)
• In an inscription from Karataş (and similar to it but more fragmentary from Armavir8):
(4) „...Sarduri, son of Argišti speaks: when Haldi, the Lord gave me the kingship, I sat down on (my) father’s throne...” (KUKN 274: 2-4)
– The inscription of Argišti II (cca. 714–680 BC) from Erçis:
(5) „...Through the might of Haldi... who strengthened me... who gave me mighty kingship and I sat down on the throne, (who) made me the kingship...” (KUKN 406A:17-26)
– The inscription of Rusa II (680?-) on the shrine of Ayanis:
8 KUKN 271.
Elements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts • 525
(6) „…when Haldi gave me the kingship, I sat down on (my) father’s throne….” (Section I: 4)
„…Rusa, son of Argišti speaks: Haldi presented me success, victory and luck...” (Section VII: 5-6)9
9
– The inscription of „Rusa, son of Erimena” (Rusa III?) found in only lately in Gövelek;10 its structure is similar to Argišti II’s above mentioned insctription from Erçiş.
It’s remarkable that this passage passes throught a specifi c evolution, in contrast with the supposing simply Urartian epigraphic material: while it appears during Minua’s reign very rarely, it has more signifi cant role later, in the Sarduri II’s inscriptions in Çavuştepe, Armavir and Karataş, during the reign of Argišti II, in Erçiş, or Rusa II’s shrine inscriptions and in the stele of Gövelek. (The appearance of passage in Argišti I’ and Sarduri II’s chronicles is quite clear thus there show the whole life of them.) Could be it related to any problems with the enforcing of the royal legitimation in the last cases? Or did any changes happen in the style of inscriptions or in the emphasis of the royal legitimation?
Our above mentioned texts are also remarkable because of two following aspects, as seen in the table:
– the context appeared in the given text;– the person of the speaker.
Relations between the
context and the speaker
The broad context
Military activities The king’s title Establishing of fortress, city,
shrine, vineyard, etc.
The speaker 1Ps. (the
king
speaks)
Sarduri II’s chronicle Sarduri II, Karataş + Armavir (text 4)
Argišti II, Erçiş (text 5)
Rusa II, Ayanis (text 6)
„Rusa, son of Erimena”
(Rusa III?), Gövelek
3Ps. (about
the king
spoken)
Minua (see text 1) Argišti I’s
chronicle (text 2)
Sarduri II, Çavuştepe (text 3)
9 Çilingiroğlu – Salvini 2001.10 Salvini 2008.
526 • Attila Buhály
The mentioned texts suggest the next tendencies:– In the fi rst part of the „story” of the Urartian epigraphical material (Minua and
the chronicles of Argišti I and Sarduri II), the passage appears mainly in broad contexts of military activities, or it is an introductional part of a king's title;
– The speaker could be grammatically 3rd person (about the king spoken – Minua, Argišti I's chronicle) or the 1st person (the king speaks himself – Sarduri II's chronicle);
– in the latter part of the material, from the reign of Sarduri II, is stressed the establishing of buildings or any agricultural facilities (except of his chronicle);
– the speaker changes to 1st person (except of Sarduri II's shrine inscription in Çavuştepe).
In this latter part of texts, two trends seem to be stressed:– the passage of „choosen by gods” and/or inauguration is declared by the king
himself, thus it will be a part of the self-represenatation of kings;11
– the builder, the establisher role of king will be a stressed part of this representation, beside the military activities.
THE MOTIF OF WEAPON
The appearance of any weapons as a symbol in the Urartian context is quite diff erent from Westenholz’s descripition. In Urartu, as we could see above (1), it is associated with the god Haldi, and this weapon is probably a holy spear.12 The passage „Haldi set off , his spear (set off )” is an integrant part of inscriptions representing military activities. They show a characteristic dimension of the campaigns of the Urartians and the Urartian kings, at least regarding to the royal representation: at the start of a war, it is always Haldi who „leaves”, and ritually he „leads” the army with his spear. On the stele of the Akkadian Naram-Sin, the king himself leads his army13; in Urartu it is not the king, but the god Haldi, at least in the ritual meaning: the real and victorius conqueror is not the king but Haldi himself, thus the king and the campaign are fullfi lling Haldi’s will.
11 Houston 2004: 235.12 Or, there is an iconographical representation of Haldi with a spear-like weapon and a bow: Belli
1998: 40 (Çizim 18).13 Referred by Westenholz 2000: 101ff .
Elements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts • 527
EXTRAORDINALLY AND ADVENTUROUS ACTIONS
The Urartian epigraphical material deals only with the acts and decrees of kings. But the appearance of this element is very rare, at least as we known it from Mesopotamia. The acts of the texts, the executives of campaigns from collecting army to conquer of lands of enemies, or the prescribers of the ritual decrees are the kings themselves (or Haldi, as seen above). They also make uninhabitated territories fertile (see below). But the motifs, which tell us about actions „never made before”, are very rare.
The text locus of Minua mentioned above (1) could be similar. It is maybe about a conquer, which „no one of earlier kings managed” – at least if our interpretations are correct. Apart from it, here we could mention maybe diff erent phrases which stress the mighty nature of rulers” acts (military activities, campaigns).
Particular parts of these texts, which stress a king’s personal abilities or almost „sport achievements”. We have two texts of them:
– King Minua jumped over 22 elbows „with a horse named Eagle” (KUKN 136);– King Argišti I shooted an arrow over 950 elbows, „from the garden of Gilurani to
Išpilini, son of Batu.” (KUKN 408)
THE BIPOLAR OPPOSITION OF „ABANDONED” VS. „CIVILIZED”
One of the frequently occured passage of Urartian texts the contrast of „abandoned” and „fertile”; and there is an important element of the royal legitimacy which is about making fertile earlier abandoned territories. Because of the geographical and natural circumstances of the territory, it could be understand literally (see the making of Minua-canal14), but let we see any motifs according to it:
– building a suse-sanctuary, mostly for Haldi (KUKN 39, passim) but for another deities as well (Irmušini, see above, text 3);
– making an inscription (KUKN 39a)– making a stele for Haldi (KUKN 45; 75)– making a „gate” for Haldi (KUKN 48)– establishing a fortress, named after a king himself (KUKN 48)– making a canal (KUKN 187)– establishing a vineyard, orchard, pasture and/or arable land (KUKN 247; 406)
14 KUKN 60–73; Garbrecht 1980; Belli 1997: 18–25 (Turkish), 39–44 (English).
528 • Attila Buhály
This kind of civilisational attitude is very important as supporting the king’s legitimation in our texts, connected moreover to the above mentioned passage of inauguration: one of the important role of by gods (more precisely: by Haldi) choosen king is to make the devastated lands fertile, establish inhabitant and inhabitable territories. According to the whole material, there is even a particular diff erence between the early and late age of Urartu’s history: while in the earlier inscriptions (see Minua, above, text 1) the military activities are dominant, as the verifi cator of the king’s might, later, mostly during the reign of Rusa II, mainly the building activities, the fertilisation of inhabitant territories are stressed.
To sum up, in the Urartian epigraphic material are many of the motifs of royal legitimation analized by Westenholz, although lots of particular elements are noticable. Beside of a lack of iconographic representation, the following epic elements are stressed on the stele and rock inscriptions:
– choosen by gods: the king’s might is got from Haldi – in fact whether it is independent and/or beside of that he inherits it from his father;
– the king’s all acts (from the campaign to establishing cities, agricultural foundations, or only erecting a stele) happen by and through the might and urge of Haldi. Vica versa, the king’s all acts eventually are fulfi lling of Haldi’s will;
– it’s similar in the case of campaigns: the starter and leader of the army are Haldi himself; the campaign is just an execution of Haldi’s will;
– The stressed part of the royal ideology is that the king choosen by gods (Haldi) are the builder of cities, fortresses, founder of agricultural projects (vineyards, orchards), or order of ritual prescriptions.
These elements could be organized and stressed diff erent by the several ages of the Urartian epigraphic material; It would be worth studying if there are several historical events behind these motifs or these are purely diff erent emphasis in the texts and ages.
Elements of the Royal Ideology in Urartian Texts • 529
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Balkan, K.
1960 Ein urartäischer Tempel auf Anzavurtepe bei Patnos und hier entdeckte Inschriften
– Patnos Yakınında Anzavurtepe Bulunan Urartu Tapınağı ve Kitaberleri. Anadolu 5:
99–158.
Belli, O.
1997 Doğu Anadolu’da Urartu Sulama Kanallari – Urartian Irrigitation Canals in Eastern Anatolia.
İstanbul.
1998 Anzaf Kaleleri ve Urartu Tanrilari. İstanbul.
Chačikjan, M. L.
1985 Hurritskij i urartskij jazyki. Erevan.
Çilingiroğlu, A. A. – Salvini, M. (eds.)
2001 Ayanis I. Ten Years’ Excavations at Rusahinili Eiduru-kai. (= Documenta Asiana VI) Roma.
Djakonov, I. M.
1963 Urarskie pis’ma i dokumenty. Moskva – Leningrad.
Garbrecht, G.
1980 The Water Supply System at Tuspa (Urartu). World Archaeology 11/3: 306–312.
HchI
F. W. König Handbuch der chaldischen Inschriften I-II. Graz, 1955–1957.
Houston, S.
2004 The Archaeology of Communication Technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 33/1:
223–250.
KUKN
N. Arutjunjan Korpus urartskich klinoobraznych nadpisej. Erevan, 2001.
Laroche, E.
1980 Glossaire de la langue hourrite. Paris.
Melikišvili, G. A.
1970 Die urartäische Sprache. Roma.
Salvini, M.
1995 Geschichte und Kultur der Urartäer. Darmstadt.
2008 Ein folgendreicher Textanschluss. Antike Welt 2008/2: 35–37.
Westenholz, J.
2000 The King, the Emperor, and the Empire. Continuity and Discontinuity of Royal
Representation in Text and Image. Pp. 99–125 in S. Aro – R. M. Whiting (eds.) The Heirs
of Assyria. Proceedings of the Opening Symposium of the A ssyrian and Babylonian Intellectual
530 • Attila Buhály
Heritage Project. Held in Tvärminne, Finland, October 8-11, 1998. (= Melammu Symposia 1)
Helsinki.
Wilhelm, G.
1986 Urartu als Region der Keilschriftkultur. Pp. 95–113 in V. Haas (ed.) Das Reich Urartu:
Ein altorientalischer Staat im 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Konstanz.
Zimansky, P.
1985 Ecology and Empire. The Structure of the Urartian State. Chicago.