090151b28036f328.pdf - Environmental Protection Agency
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of 090151b28036f328.pdf - Environmental Protection Agency
Enterpris~ House, Centre Park Road, Cork, Ireland.
T~I: 021-4314388 Fax: 021-4314369
E-mail: [email protected]
www.mescal.ie
Environmental Protection AgencyPOBox 3000Johnstown Castle EstateCo Wexford
10/05110
Dear Sirs
@meSCaL~associates
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
ENVIRONMENTAL p\{0T£CTiONAGENCY
12 MAY 2010
Re: Connacht Gold Dairy Ingredients, BallaghdereenIPPC Licence - P0802-01
Following EPA correspondence re the above on 07/04/10 we make application forreview of the above.
We enclose:
- 1 original- I hardcopy- 2 no CD's- Cheque for €7000.
We trust you will find the above in order.
Faithfully Yours
11(,f: () m5~j~~-~------Michael Mescal
c. Connacht Gold.
Directors: M. Mescal BE, MASc, C Eng, FIEI, MCIWEM, M Cons EI K. Mescal. Mescal & Associates Ltd. VAT No.: IE8229001V REG No.: 229001
Enterpris~ House, Centre Park Road, Cork, Ireland.
T~I: 021-4314388 Fax: 021-4314369
E-mail: [email protected]
www.mescal.ie
Environmental Protection AgencyPOBox 3000Johnstown Castle EstateCo Wexford
10/05110
Dear Sirs
@meSCaL~associates
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
ENVIRONMENTAL p\{0T£CTiONAGENCY
12 MAY 2010
Re: Connacht Gold Dairy Ingredients, BallaghdereenIPPC Licence - P0802-01
Following EPA correspondence re the above on 07/04/10 we make application forreview of the above.
We enclose:
- 1 original- I hardcopy- 2 no CD's- Cheque for €7000.
We trust you will find the above in order.
Faithfully Yours
11(,f: () m5~j~~-~------Michael Mescal
c. Connacht Gold.
Directors: M. Mescal BE, MASc, C Eng, FIEI, MCIWEM, M Cons EI K. Mescal. Mescal & Associates Ltd. VAT No.: IE8229001V REG No.: 229001
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control
(IPPC) Licensing
Application Form
Environmental Protection Agency
P.O. Box 3000, Johnstown Castle Estate, Co. Wexford
Lo Call: 1890 335599 Telephone: 053-9160600 Fax: 053-9160699
Web: www.epa.ie Email: [email protected]
EPA Reg. No: (Office use only)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 2 of 50
CONTENTS
ABOUT THIS APPLICATION FORM .................................................................... 3
SECTION A: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ..................................................... 4
SECTION B: GENERAL .......................................................................................... 5
SECTION C: MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTALLATION ................................ 9
SECTION D: INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION ........................................... 9
SECTION E: EMISSIONS ...................................................................................... 10
SECTION F: CONTROL & MONITORING ....................................................... 12
SECTION G: RESOURCE USE AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY ....................... 13
SECTION H: MATERIALS HANDLING ............................................................ 13
SECTION I: EXISTING ENVIRONMENT & IMPACT OF THE ACTIVITY14
SECTION J: ACCIDENT PREVENTION & EMERGENCY RESPONSE ...... 17
SECTION K: REMEDIATION, DECOMMISSIONING, RESTORATION &
AFTERCARE ........................................................................................................... 17
SECTION L: STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ................................................. 17
SECTION M: DECLARATION ............................................................................. 19
ANNEX 1: TABLES/ATTACHMENTS ............................................................... 20
ANNEX 2: CHECKLIST FOR ARTICLE 10 COMPLIANCE .............................. 45
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 3 of 50
ABOUT THIS APPLICATION FORM
This form is for the purpose of making an application for an Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPC) Licence under the Environmental Protection Agency
Acts, 1992 and 2003. There is a separate application form for applicants who wish to
apply for the Pig & Poultry sector.
The Application Form must be completed in accordance with the instructions provided
in the IPPC Licensing Application Guidance Note. The Guidance Note gives an overview
of IPPC Licensing, outlines the licence application process (including number of copies
required) and specifies the information to be submitted in the application. The
Guidance Note and application forms are available to download from the IPPC
Licensing pages of the EPA’s website at www.epa.ie. A valid application for an IPPC
licence must contain the information prescribed in the Environmental Protection
Agency (Licensing) Regulations, 1994 to 2004. Article 10 of the Regulations sets out
the statutory requirements for information to accompany a licence application. The
application form is designed in such a way as to set out these questions in a
structured manner and not necessarily in the order presented in Article 10. In order
to ensure a legally valid application in respect of Article 10 requirements, please
complete the Article 10 Checklist provided in Annex 2.
This Application Form does not purport to be and should not be considered a legal
interpretation of the provisions and requirements of the Environmental Protection
Agency Acts, 1992 and 2003 and the Environmental Protection Agency (Licensing)
Regulations 1994 to 2004. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy
of the material contained in the Application Form, the EPA assumes no responsibility
and gives no guarantees, undertakings and warranties concerning the accuracy,
completeness or up-to-date nature of the information provided herein and does not
accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions.
Should there be any contradiction between the information requirements set out in
the Application Form and any clarifying explanation contained in the accompanying
Guidance Note, then the requirements in this Application Form shall take precedence.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 4 of 50
SECTION A: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
A non-technical summary of the application is to be included here. The summary should identify all environmental impacts of significance associated with the carrying on of the activity/activities, and describe mitigation measures proposed or existing to address these impacts. This description should also indicate the normal operating hours and days per week of the activity. The following information must be included in the non-technical summary:
A description of:
− the installation and its activities,
− the raw and auxiliary materials, other substances and the energy used in or
generated by the installation,
− the sources of emissions from the installation,
− the environmental conditions of the site of the installation (e.g. soil and
groundwater, air, noise, surface water),
− the nature and quantities of foreseeable emissions from the installation into each
medium as well as identification of significant effects of the emissions on the
environment,
− the proposed technology and other techniques for preventing or, where this is not
possible, reducing emissions from the installation,
− where necessary, measures for the prevention and recovery of waste generated by
the installation,
− further measures planned to comply with the general principles of the basic
obligations of the operator i.e.
(a) all the appropriate preventive measures are taken against pollution, in
particular through application of the Best Available Techniques (BAT);
(b) no significant pollution is caused;
(c) waste production is avoided in accordance with Council Directive 75/442/EEC
of 15 July 1975 on waste; where waste is produced, it is recovered or, where
that is technically and economically impossible, it is disposed of while avoiding
or reducing any impact on the environment;
(d) energy and other resources are used efficiently;
(e) the necessary measures are taken to prevent accidents and limit their
consequences;
(f) the necessary measures are taken upon definitive cessation of activities to
avoid any pollution risk and return the site of operation to a satisfactory state.
− measures planned to monitor emissions into the environment.
Supporting information should form Attachment No A.1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 5 of 50
SECTION B: GENERAL
B.1. Owner/Operator
Name*: Connacht Gold Dairy Ingredients
Address: Dublin Rd
Ballaghadereen
Co Roscommon
Tel: 094 9860114
Fax: 094 9860157
e-mail: [email protected]
* This should be the name of the applicant which is current on the date this IPPC Licence
Application is lodged with the Agency. It should be the name of the legal entity (which
can be a limited company or a sole trader). A trading/business name is not acceptable.
Name and Address for Correspondence
Only application documentation submitted by the applicant and by the nominated person will be
deemed to have come from the applicant.
Name: Connacht Gold Dairy Ingredients
Address: Dublin Rd
Ballaghadereen
Co Roscommon
Tel: 094 9860114
Fax: 094 9860157
e-mail: [email protected]
Address of registered or principal office of Body Corporate (if applicable)
Address: Connacht Gold CoOperative Society Ltd
Tubbercurry
Co Sligo
Tel: 071 9186500
Fax: 071 9185239
e-mail: [email protected]
If the applicant is a body corporate, the following information must be attached as
Attachment B1:
a) a Certified Copy of the Certificate of Incorporation.
b) the Company’s Registration Number from the Companies Registry Office.
c) Particulars of Registered Office of the Company.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:08
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 6 of 50
Name and address of the proprietor(s) of the Land on which the Activity is
situated (if different from applicant named above):
Proprietor’s
Name:
Address:
Tel:
Fax:
e-mail:
Name and address of the owner(s) of the building and ancillary plant in which the
activity is situated ( if different from applicant named above):
Name:
Address:
Tel:
Fax:
e-mail:
B.2. Location of Activity
Name: Connacht Gold Dairy Ingredients
Address*: Dublin Rd
Ballaghadereen
Co Roscommon
Tel: 094 9860114
Fax: 094 9860157
Contact Name: Joe Dillon
Position: Environmental Manager
e-mail: [email protected] * Include any townland.
National Grid Reference
(12 digit 6E,6N)
162697E , 294445N
Location maps (≤A3), appropriately scaled, with legible grid references should be enclosed in Attachment B.2. The site boundary must be outlined on the map in colour.
Geo-referenced digital drawing files (e.g. AutoCAD files) in Irish Grid projection of the site
boundary and overall site plan, including labelled emission, monitoring and sampling
points, are also required. This data should be provided to the Agency on a separate CD-
Rom containing sections B.2, E.6 and F.3.
Name of geo-referenced
digital drawing files
Autocad
Name of CD-Rom with
digital drawing files
Connacht Gold IPPC Application
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 7 of 50
B.3. Class of Activity
Identify the relevant activities in the First, Third or Fourth Schedule of the PoE Act 2004 to
which the activity relates:
Schedule Class DescriptionNote 1
1 7.2.1 The treatment and processing of milk , the quantity
of milk received being greater than 200 tonnes per
day (average value on a yearly basis)
Note 1: In order to give a precise identification select only those words from the
description of the class or classes that best describes the nature of the activity for which the
licence is being applied for.
B.4. Employees/ Capital Cost
Give-
(i) In the case of an established activity, the number of employees and other persons working or engaged in connection with the activity on the date after which a licence is required and during normal levels of operation, or
(ii) In any other case, the gross capital cost of the activity to which the application relates.
Number of Employees (existing facilities): 65
Gross Capital Cost (new proposals) € €75 K
B.5. Relevant Planning Authority
Give the name of the planning authority in whose functional area the activity is or will be
carried out.
Name: Roscommon co Council
Address: Courthouse
Roscommon
Tel: 090 6637100
Fax:
Planning Permission relating to this application:
has been obtained is being processed
is not yet applied for is not required /
Local Authority Planning File Reference
No:
Attachment B.5 should contain all planning permissions, including a copy of all
conditions, and the required copies of any EIS should also be enclosed. For existing
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 8 of 50
activities, Attachment No B.5 should also contain all licences and permits past and
present in force at the time of submission.
B.6. Relevant Sanitary Authority.
In the case of a discharge of any trade effluent or other matter to a sewer of a sanitary
authority, give the name of the sanitary authority in which the sewer is vested or by which it
is controlled.
Name: Roscommon Co Council
Address: Courthouse
Roscommon
Tel: 090 6637100
Fax:
In the case of a discharge of any trade effluent or other matter to a sewer not vested by a
sanitary authority, the applicant must supply as Attachment No B.6; (a) the name and
address of the owner(s) of the sewer and the waste water treatment plant to which the
sewer discharges and who are responsible for the quality of the treated effluent discharging
to waters and (b) a copy of the effluent regulations and the agreement between the
applicant and the aforementioned.
Name:
Address:
Tel:
Fax:
B.7. Relevant Health Board Region
The applicant should indicate the Health Board Region where the activity is or will be
located.
Name: HSE
Address: Merlin Park Regional Hospital
Galway
Tel: 090 662811
Fax:
B.8 Site Notice, Newspaper Advertisement and Planning Authority Notice.
Attachment No B.8 should contain a copy of the text of the site notice, a map (no larger
than A3) showing its location on site (in accordance with Article 7 of the Regulations) and a
copy of the newspaper advertisement. A copy of the notice given to the Planning Authority
should also be included.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 9 of 50
B.9 Seveso II Regulations No
State whether the activity is an establishment to which the EC (Control of Major Accident
Hazards involving Dangerous Substances) Regulations (S.I. No. 74 of 2006) apply.
If yes, outline how the process comes under these regulations.
Supporting information should be included in Attachment No B.9.
B.10 IPPC Directive
Specify whether the activity is a category of industrial activity referred to in Annex I of
the IPPC Directive (2008/1/EC) and if yes specify the category.
No
Supporting information should be included in Attachment No B.10.
SECTION C: MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTALLATION
C.1 Site Management & Control Unchanged
Details should be provided on the management structures for the activity. Organisational
charts and all relevant environmental management policy statements, including
provisions for on-going assessment of environmental performance, are required.
C.2 Environmental Management System (EMS)
Indicate whether an Environmental Management System has been developed for the
installation. If yes, specify which standard and include a copy of the accreditation
certificate.
C.3 Hours of Operation Unchanged
Provide details of the hours of operation for the installation, including:
(a) Proposed hours of operation.
(b) Proposed hours of construction and development works and timeframes.
(c) Any other relevant hours of operation expected.
This information should form Attachment No C.
SECTION D: INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION
D.1. Operational Information Requirements Unchanged
Describe the plant, methods, processes, ancillary processes, abatement, recovery and
treatment systems, and operating procedures for the activity, to include a copy of such
plans, drawings or maps, (site plans and location maps, process flow diagrams), and such
other particulars, reports and supporting documentation as are necessary to describe all
aspects of the activity. Maps and drawings must be no larger than A3 size.
A development and operational history of the site should be included here.
Attachment No D should contain a list of all unit operations (processes) to be carried
out, including flow diagrams of each with any relevant additional information.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 10 of 50
SECTION E: EMISSIONS
E.1. Emissions to Atmosphere Unchanged
E.1.A. Details of all point emissions to atmosphere
Details of all point emissions to atmosphere should be supplied. Complete Table E.1(i)
for Boiler Emissions and Table E.1(ii) and E.1(iii) for all other main emission points.
Complete Table E.1(iv) for minor emission points.
A summary list of the emission points, together with maps and/or drawings (no larger
than A3), and supporting documentation should be included as Attachment No E. Plans
of emission elevations, relevant roof heights, etc., should also be included, as should
detailed descriptions and schematics of all abatement systems.
The applicant should address in particular any emission point where the substances listed
in the Schedule of S.I. 394 of 2004 are emitted.
For emissions outside the BAT guidance limit, a full evaluation of the existing
abatement/treatment system must be provided. A planned programme of improvement
towards meeting upgraded standards is required. This should highlight specific goals and
a time scale, together with options for modification, upgrading or replacement as
required to bring the emissions within the limits as set out in the BAT guidance note(s).
These notes can be found on the EPA website at www.epa.ie.
E.1.B. Fugitive and Potential emissions
Give summary details of fugitive and potential emissions in Table E.1(v).
In relation to activities listed in the Schedule of Council Directive 1999/13/EC on the
limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in
certain activities and installations;
− specify the relevant category of activity in the Schedule
− specify how the requirements in relation to fugitive emissions will be met.
Full details and any supporting information should form Attachment E.1.B
E.2 Emissions to Surface Waters - Cooling Water extended to SW2A
- Final outfall of process SW1 goes to
River via Co Co sewer.
Tables E.2(i) and E.2(ii) should be completed.
A summary list of the emission points, together with maps/drawings (no larger than A3)
and supporting documentation should be included as Attachment No E.2.
The applicant should address in particular any emission point where the substances listed
in the Schedule of S.I. No. 394 of 2004 are emitted.
Details of all List I and List II substances listed in the Annex to EU Directive 76/464/EEC
(as amended), contained in any emission must be presented. All surface water runoff
and storm water drains discharging to surface water bodies must be included. A National
Grid References (12 digit, 6E, 6N) must be given for all discharge points. The identity
and type of receiving water (river, ditch, estuary, lake, etc.) must be stated.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 11 of 50
For emissions outside the BAT guidance limit, a full evaluation of the existing
abatement/treatment system must be provided. A planned programme of improvement
towards meeting upgraded standards is required. This should highlight specific goals and
a time scale, together with options for modification, upgrading or replacement as
required to bring the emissions within the limits as set out in the BAT guidance note(s).
E.3 Emissions to Sewer Unchanged
Tables E.3(i) and E.3(ii) should be completed.
A summary list of the emission points, together with maps and/or drawings (no larger
than A3) and supporting documentation should be included as Attachment No E.3.
Details of all List I and List II substances listed in the Annex to EU Directive 76/464/EEC
(as amended), contained in any emission must be presented. All relevant information on
the receiving sewer, including any effluent treatment/abatement systems, not already
described, with schematics as appropriate should also be included in Attachment No E.3.
For emissions outside BAT guidance limit (where given), a full evaluation of the existing
abatement/treatment system must be provided. A planned programme of improvement
towards meeting upgraded standards is required. This should highlight specific goals and
a time scale, together with options for modification, upgrading or replacement as
required to bring the emissions within any limits set out in the BAT guidance note(s).
E.4. Emissions to Ground Unchanged
Describe the existing or proposed arrangements necessary to give effect to Articles 3,4,5,6,
and 7 of Council Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 on the protection of
groundwater against pollution by certain dangerous substances.
The applicant should supply details of the nature and quality of the substance
(agricultural and non-agricultural waste) to be landspread (slurry, effluent, sludges etc)
as well as the proposed application rates, periods of application and mode of application
(e.g., pipe discharge, tanker).
For emissions outside the BAT guidance limit, a full evaluation of the existing
abatement/treatment system must be provided. A planned programme of improvement
towards meeting upgraded standards is required. This should highlight specific goals and
a time scale, together with options for modification, upgrading or replacement as
required to bring the emissions within the limits as set out in the BAT guidance note(s).
E.5 Noise Emissions Unchanged
Give particulars of the source, location, nature, level, and the period or periods during which
the noise emissions are made or are to be made.
Table E.5(i) should be completed, as relevant, for each source.
Supporting information should form Attachment No E.5
For emissions outside the EPA Guidance Note for Noise in elation to Scheduled Activities
2nd Edition (2006), a full evaluation of the existing abatement/treatment system must be
provided. A planned programme of improvement towards meeting upgraded standards
is required. This should highlight specific goals and a time scale, together with options
for modification, upgrading or replacement as required to bring the emissions within the
limits as set out in the Guidance Note.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 12 of 50
E.6 Tabular Data on Emission Points
Applicants should submit the following information for each emission point:
Point
Code
Point Type Easting Northing Verified Emission
The new information is the proposed SW2A cooling water outfall to River Lung
at E163427,N294807 and the treated effluent outfalling to River Lung
E163196,N294626.
An individual record (i.e. row) is required for each emission point. Acceptable file formats
include Excel, Access or other upon agreement with the Agency. A standard Excel
template can be downloaded from the EPA website at www.epa.ie. This data should be
submitted to the Agency on a separate CD-Rom containing sections B.2, E.6 and F.3.
SECTION F: CONTROL & MONITORING
Describe the proposed technology and other techniques for preventing or,
where this is not possible, reducing emissions from the installation/facility.
F.1: Treatment, Abatement and Control Systems Unchanged
Details of treatment/abatement systems (air and effluent emissions) should be included,
together with schematics as appropriate.
For each Emission Point identified complete Table F.1(i) and include detailed descriptions
and schematics of all abatement systems.
Attachment No F.1 should contain any supporting information.
F.2: Emissions Monitoring and Sampling Points
Unchanged except for temp monitor at SW2A
Identify monitoring and sampling points and outline proposals for monitoring emissions.
Table F.2(i) should be completed (where relevant) for air emissions, for emissions to
surface waters, for emissions to sewers, for emissions to ground, and for waste
emissions. Where ambient environment monitoring is carried out or proposed, Table
F.2(ii) should be completed as relevant for each environmental medium.
Include details of monitoring/sampling locations and methods.
Attachment No F.2 should contain any supporting information.
F.3: Tabular Data on Monitoring and Sampling Points
Applicants should submit the following information for each monitoring and sampling
point:
Point
Code
Point Type Easting Northing Verified Pollutant
Unchanged except for Cooling Water temp to be monitored at SW2A E163427
N294807
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 13 of 50
An individual record (i.e. row) is required for each monitoring and sampling point.
Acceptable file formats include Excel, Access or other upon agreement with the Agency.
A standard Excel template can be downloaded from the EPA website at www.epa.ie. This
data should be submitted to the Agency on a separate CD-Rom containing sections B.2,
E.6 and F.3.
Point source monitoring/sampling refers to monitoring from specific emission points (e.g.
from a boiler stack or outlet from a wastewater treatment plant). Examples of ambient
monitoring includes monitoring of ambient air quality (e.g. boundary or off-site) or
monitoring of river quality upstream/downstream of an effluent discharge.
SECTION G: RESOURCE USE AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Unchanged
G.1 Give a list of the raw and ancillary materials, substances, preparations,
fuels and energy which will be produced by or utilised in the activity.
The list(s) given should be very comprehensive, all materials used, fuels, intermediates,
laboratory chemicals and product should be included.
Particular attention should be paid to materials and product consisting of, or containing,
dangerous substances as described in the EU (Classification, Packaging, Labelling and
Notification of Dangerous Substances) Regulations 1994 [SI 77/94]. The list must
classify these materials in accordance with Article 2 of these Regulations, and must
specify the designated Risk Phrases (R-Phrases) of each substance in accordance with
Schedule 2 of the Regulations
Tables G.1(i) and G.1(ii) must be completed. Copy as required.
Supporting information should be given in Attachment No G.
G.2 Energy Efficiency
A description of the energy used in or generated by the activity must be provided.
Outline the measures taken to ensure that energy is used efficiently and where
appropriate, an energy audit with reference to the EPA Guidance document on Energy
Audits should be carried out.
SECTION H: MATERIALS HANDLING
Unchanged
H.1 Raw Materials, Intermediates and Product Handling
All materials should be listed in Tables G.1(i) and G.(ii) of Section G.
Details of the storage conditions, location within the site, segregation system used and
transport systems within the site should be outlined here. In addition, information
relating to the integrity, impermeability and recent testing of pipes, tanks and bund
areas should be outlined.
H.2 Describe the arrangements for the recovery or disposal of solid and
liquid wastes accepted into or generated by the installation/facility.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 14 of 50
For each waste material, give full particulars of:
(a) Name
(b) Description & nature of waste
(c) Source
(d) Where stored and integrity/impermeability of storage areas
(e) Amount (m3) and tonnage
(f) Period or Periods of generation
(g) Analysis ( include test methods and Q.C. )
(h) European Waste Catalogue Code
(i) Waste Category per EC Reg 1774/2002/EC where relevant
Where any waste would be classified as Hazardous Waste as defined in the Waste
Management Acts, 1996 to 2003, this should be made clear in the information provided.
Summary Tables H.1(i) and H.1(ii) should also be completed, as appropriate, for each
waste. The licence/permit register number of the waste collection agent or
disposal/recovery operator should be supplied as well as the expiry date of the relevant
permits.
Supporting information should form Attachment No H.2
H.3 Waste disposal by on-site landfilling
For wastes to be disposed of by landfilling on-site, full details of the disposal site should
be submitted (to include inter alia, site selection procedures, location maps, (no larger
than A3) geology, hydrogeology, operational plan, containment, gas and leachate
management, post-closure care).
Supporting information should form Attachment No H.3.
SECTION I: EXISTING ENVIRONMENT & IMPACT OF THE ACTIVITY
See Attachments Describe the conditions of the site of the installation.
Provide an assessment of the effects of any emissions on the environment,
including on an environmental medium other than that into which the emissions
are made.
Describe, where appropriate, measures for minimising pollution over long
distances or in the territory of other states.
I.1.Assessment of atmospheric emissions
Describe the existing environment in terms of air quality with particular reference to
ambient air quality standards.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 15 of 50
Provide a statement whether or not emissions of main polluting substances (as defined in
the Schedule of S.I. 394 of 2004) to the atmosphere are likely to impair the
environment.
Give summary details and an assessment of the impacts of any existing or proposed
emissions on the environment, including environmental media other than those into which
the emissions are to be made.
Attachment No I.1 should also contain full details of any dispersion modelling of
atmospheric emissions from the activity, where required. When carrying out dispersion
modelling, regard should be had to the "Guidelines for the Preparation of Dispersion
Modelling Assessments for Compliance with Regulatory Requirements – an Update to Royal Meteorological Society Guidance" or similar guidelines from a recognised authority.
I.2. Assessment of Impact on Receiving Surface Water
Describe the existing environment in terms of water quality with particular reference to
environmental quality standards or other legislative standards. Table I.2(i) should be
completed
Provide a statement whether or not emissions of main polluting substances (as defined in
the Schedule of S.I. 394 of 2004) to water are likely to impair the environment.
Give summary details and an assessment of the impacts of any existing or proposed
emissions on the environment, including environmental media other than those into which
the emissions are to be made.
Full details of the assessment and any other relevant information on the receiving
environment should be submitted as Attachment No I.2.
I.3. Assessment of Impact of Sewage Discharge.
Give summary details and an assessment of the impacts of any existing or proposed
emissions on the environment, including environmental media other than those into which
the emissions are to be made.
Full details of the assessment and any other supporting information should form
Attachment No I.3.
I.4 Assessment of Impact of Ground/Groundwater Emissions
Describe the existing groundwater quality. Tables I.4(i) should be completed.
Give summary details and an assessment of the impacts of any existing or proposed
emissions on the ground (aquifers, soils, sub-soils and rock environment), including any
impact on environmental media other than those into which the emissions are to be made.
This includes landspreading, land injection etc.
Land on which material may be landspread shall be identified on a suitable scaled map
(1:10,560 and 1:50,000) and submitted as no greater than A3 size. All vulnerable (as a
result of ground emissions) surface water bodies must be identified on these maps.
Additional information should be included in Attachment No I.4.
Landspreading of Agricultural/Non Agricultural Wastes
Tables I.4(ii) and I.4.(iii) should be complete where applicable. Further information is
available in the Application Guidance Document.
I.5 Ground and/or Groundwater Contamination
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 16 of 50
Summary details of known ground and/or groundwater contamination, historical or current,
on or under the site must be given.
Full details including all relevant investigative studies, assessments, or reports, monitoring
results, location and design of monitoring installations, plans, drawings, documentation,
including containment engineering, remedial works, and any other supporting information
should be included in Attachment No I.5.
I.6 Assessment of the Environmental Impact of On-site Waste Recovery and/or Disposal.
Describe the arrangements for the prevention and recovery of waste generated by the
activity.
Give details, and an assessment of the impact of any existing or proposed on-site waste
recovery/disposal on the environment, including environmental media other than those
into which the emissions are to be made.
This information should form Attachment No I.6.
I.7 Noise Impact
Give details and an assessment of the impacts of any existing or proposed emissions on the
environment, including environmental media other than those into which the emissions are
to be made.
Ambient noise measurements
Complete Table I.7(i) in relation to the information required below:
(i) State the maximum Sound Pressure Levels which will be experienced at typical
points on the boundary of the operation. (State sampling interval and duration)
(ii) State the maximum Sound Pressure Levels which will be experienced at typical
noise sensitive locations, outside the boundary of the operation.
(iii) Give details of the background noise levels experienced at the site in the absence of
noise from this operation.
Prediction models, maps (no larger than A3), diagrams and supporting documents,
including details of noise attenuation and noise proposed control measures to be
employed, should form Attachment No I.7.
I.8 Environmental Considerations and BAT
Describe in outline the main alternatives, if any, to the proposals contained in
the application.
Describe any environmental considerations which have been made with respect to the
use of cleaner technologies, waste minimisation and raw material substitution.
Describe the measures proposed or in place to ensure that:
(a) The best available techniques are or will be used to prevent or eliminate or, where
that is not practicable, generally reduce an emission from the activity;
(b) no significant pollution is caused;
(c) waste production is avoided in accordance with Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15
July 1975 on waste; where waste is produced, it is recovered or, where that is
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 17 of 50
technically and economically impossible, it is disposed of while avoiding or reducing
any impact on the environment;
(d) energy and other resources are used efficiently;
(e) the necessary measures are taken to prevent accidents and limit their
consequences;
(f) the necessary measures are taken upon definitive cessation of activities to avoid
any pollution risk and return the site of operation to a satisfactory state.
Supporting information should form Attachment No I.8.
SECTION J: ACCIDENT PREVENTION & EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Unchanged
Describe the existing or proposed measures, including emergency procedures, to
minimise the impact on the environment of an accidental emission or spillage.
Also outline what provisions have been made for response to emergency situations
outside of normal working hours, i.e. during night-time, weekends and holiday periods.
Describe the arrangements for abnormal operating conditions including start-up, leaks,
malfunctions or momentary stoppages.
Supporting information should form Attachment No J.
SECTION K: REMEDIATION, DECOMMISSIONING, RESTORATION & AFTERCARE
Unchanged Describe the existing or proposed measures to minimise the impact on the environment
after the activity or part of the activity ceases operation, including provision for post-
closure care of any potentially polluting residuals.
Supporting information should be included as Attachment No. K.
SECTION L: STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Unchanged Indicate how the requirements of Section 83(5)(a)(i) to (v) and (vii) to (x) of the EPA Acts,
1992 and 2003 shall be met, having regard, where appropriate, to any relevant specification
issued by the Agency under section 5 (3) of the Act and the reasons for the selection of the
arrangements proposed.
Indicate whether or not the activity is carried out, or may be carried out, or is located
such that it is liable to have an adverse effect on -
(a) a site placed on a list in accordance with Chapter 1 of SI 94 of 1997, or
(b) a site where consultation has been initiated in accordance with Article 5 of the
EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), or
Indicate whether or not the activity is liable to have an adverse effect on water quality in
light of S.I. No. 258 of 1998 (Local Government (Water Pollution) Act, 1977 (Water
Quality Standards for Phosphorus) Regulations, 1998).
Indicate whether any of the substances specified in the Schedule of the EPA
(Licensing)(Amendment) 2004, S.I. 394 of 2004, are discharged by the activity to the
relevant medium.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 18 of 50
Fit and Proper Person
The PoE Act in Section 83(5)(xi) specifies that the Agency shall not grant a licence unless
it is satisfied that the applicant or licensee or transferee as the case may be is a fit and
proper person. Section 84(4) of the PoE Act specifies the information required to enable
a determination to be made by the Agency.
• Indicate whether the applicant or other relevant person has been convicted under
the PoE Act, the Waste Management Act 1996, the Local Government (Water
pollution) Acts 1977 and 1990 or the Air Pollution Act 1987.
• Provide details of the applicant’s technical knowledge and/or qualifications, along
with that of other relevant employees.
• Provide information to show that the person is likely to be in a position to meet any
financial commitments or liabilities that may have been or will be entered into or
incurred in carrying on the activity to which the application relates or in
consequence of ceasing to carry out that activity.
Supporting information should be included as Attachment No L with reference to where
the information can be found in the application.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPrcA@ication Fon VU07
SECTfOil M: DECLARATION
Declaratlon
I hereby make application for a licence / revised licence, pursuant to ttle provisions of theEnvironmental Protection Agency Acts, 1992 and 2003 and Requlations made thereunder'
I certify that the information given in this application is truthful, accurate and complete.
I give consent to the EPA to copy this application for its own use and to make it availablefor inspection and copying by the public, both in the form of paper files available forinspection at EPA and local authority offices, and via the EPA's website. This consentrelates to this appllcation ltself and to any fufther Informatlon, submlsslon, objectlon' orsubmission to an obJection whether provided by me as Applicant, any person acting onthe Applicant's behalf, or any other person.
Signed(on behalf of the organisation)
Print signature name;
Position In organisation:
Page 19 of 49
Comparry stamp or seal:
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 20 of 50
ANNEX 1: TABLES/ATTACHMENTS A1 Non-Technical Summary B8 Newspaper Advertisement, Letter to Co Council E2.1 Site Drawing A3 + Surface Water Emission Points I2.1 Site Drawing A3 I2.2 Hydraulic and Temperature Calculations I2.3 Observations of temperature made on site I2.4 EPA Flow Data I2.5 EPA River Parameter Data I2.6 Mixing Zones I2.7 Aug 2008 Report on Nutrient contribution to surface water. I2.8 Lagoon Quality I2.9 Cooling Water Temperature I2.10 River Lung Ambient monitoring I2.11 Aquafact report on freshwater macro invertebrate assessment I2.12 Connacht Gold - Discharge Temperature
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 21 of 50
Table E.1 (i) BOILER EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE (1 Page for each emission point) Unchanged
Emission Point:
Emission Point Ref. No:
Location:
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Vent Details
Diameter:
Height above Ground(m):
Date of commencement of emission:
Characteristics of Emission:
Boiler rating Steam Output:
Thermal Input:
kg/hr
MW
Boiler fuel Type:
Maximum rate at which fuel is burned
% sulphur content:
kg/hr
NOx mg/Nm3
0oC. 3% O2(Liquid or Gas), 6% O2(Solid Fuel)
Maximum volume* of emission
m3/hr
0oC, 3 % O2 (liquid or gas), 6 % O2 (solid fuel)
Temperature
oC(max) oC(min) oC(avg)
* Volume flow limits for emissions to atmosphere shall be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0oC,101.3kPa), dry gas; 3% oxygen for liquid and gas fuels; 6% oxygen for solid fuels.
(i) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up/shutdown to be
included):
Periods of Emission
(avg)
min/hr hr/day day/yr
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 22 of 50
TABLE E.1(ii) MAIN EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE (1 Page for each emission point) Unchanged
Emission Point Ref. No:
Source of Emission:
Location:
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Vent Details
Diameter:
Height above Ground(m):
Date of commencement:
Characteristics of Emission:
(i) Volume to be emitted:
Average/day Nm3/d Maximum/day Nm3/d
Maximum rate/hour Nm3/h Min efflux velocity m.sec-1
(ii) Other factors
Temperature oC(max) oC(min) oC(avg)
For Combustion Sources: Volume terms expressed as : � wet. � dry. ________%O2
(iii) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up /shutdown
to be included):
Periods of Emission
(avg)
min/hr hr/day day/yr
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 23 of 50
TABLE E.1(iii): MAIN EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE - Chemical characteristics of the emission Unchanged (1 table per emission point)
Emission Point Reference Number:
Parameter Prior to treatment(1) Brief As discharged(1)
mg/Nm3 kg/h description mg/Nm3 kg/h. kg/year
Avg Max Avg Max of treatment Avg Max Avg Max Avg Max
1. Concentrations should be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0oC,101.3kPa). Wet/dry should be the
same as given in Table E.1(ii) unless clearly stated otherwise.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 24 of 50
TABLE E.1(iv): EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE - Minor atmospheric emissions Unchanged
Emission point Description Emission details1 Abatement system employed
Reference Numbers material mg/Nm3(2)
kg/h. kg/year
1 The maximum emission should be stated for each material emitted, the concentration should be based on the maximum 30
minute mean.
2 Concentrations should be based on Normal conditions of temperature and pressure, (i.e. 0oC101.3kPa). Wet/dry should be
clearly stated. Include reference oxygen conditions for combustion sources.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 25 of 50
TABLE E.1(v): EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE – Fugitive and Potential atmospheric emissions Unchanged
Emission point ref. no.
(as per flow diagram)
Description Malfunction which
could cause an
emission
Emission details
(Potential max. emissions)1
Material mg/Nm3 kg/hour
1 Estimate the potential maximum emission for each malfunction identified.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 26 of 50
TABLE E.2(i): EMISSIONS TO SURFACE WATERS (One page for each emission)
Emission Point:
Emission Point Ref. No: SW2A
Source of Emission: Cooling water
Location : River Lung
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N): E163427,N294807
Name of receiving waters: River Lung
Flow rate in receiving waters: m3.sec-1 Dry Weather Flow
0.51 m3.sec-1 95%ile flow
Available waste assimilative
capacity:
unchanged kg/day
Emission Details:
(i) Volume to be emitted Unchanged
Normal/day m3 Maximum/day m3
Maximum rate/hour m3
(ii) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up /shutdown
to be included): Unchanged
Periods of Emission (avg) min/hr hr/day day/yr
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 27 of 50
TABLE E.2(ii): EMISSIONS TO SURFACE WATERS - Characteristics of the emission (1 table per emission point)
Emission point reference number :
Parameter Prior to treatment As discharged % Efficiency
Max.
hourly
average
(mg/l)
Max. daily
average
(mg/l)
kg/day kg/year Max. hourly
average (mg/l)
Max. daily
average (mg/l)
kg/day kg/year
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 28 of 50
TABLE E.3(i): EMISSIONS TO SEWER (One page for each emission) Unchanged
Emission Point:
Emission Point Ref. No:
Location of connection to sewer:
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Name of sewage undertaker:
Emission Details:
(i) Volume to be emitted
Normal/day m3 Maximum/day m3
Maximum rate/hour m3
(ii) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up /shutdown
to be included):
Periods of Emission
(avg)
min/hr hr/day day/yr
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 29 of 50
TABLE E.3(ii): EMISSIONS TO SEWER - Characteristics of the emission (1 table per emission point) Unchanged
Emission point reference number :
Parameter Prior to treatment As discharged % Efficiency
Max.
hourly
average
(mg/l)
Max. daily
average
(mg/l)
kg/day kg/year Max. hourly
average (mg/l)
Max. daily
average (mg/l)
kg/day kg/year
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 30 of 50
TABLE E.4(i): EMISSIONS TO GROUND (1 Page for each emission point) Unchanged
Emission Point or Area:
Emission Point/Area Ref. No:
Emission Pathway:
(borehole, well, percolation area, soakaway, landspreading, etc.)
Location :
Grid Ref. (12 digit, 6E,6N):
Elevation of discharge: (relative to Ordnance Datum)
Aquifer classification for receiving groundwater body:
Groundwater vulnerability assessment (including vulnerability rating):
Identity and proximity of groundwater sources at risk (wells, springs, etc):
Identity and proximity of surface water bodies at risk:
Emission Details:
(i) Volume to be emitted
Normal/day m3 Maximum/day m3
Maximum rate/hour m3
(ii) Period or periods during which emissions are made, or are to be made, including daily or seasonal variations (start-up /shutdown
to be included):
Periods of Emission (avg) min/hr hr/day day/yr
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 31 of 50
TABLE E.4(ii): EMISSIONS TO GROUND - Characteristics of the emission (1 table per emission point) Unchanged
Emission point/area reference number:
Parameter Prior to treatment As discharged % Efficiency
Max.
hourly
average
(mg/l)
Max. daily
average
(mg/l)
kg/day kg/year Max. hourly
average (mg/l)
Max. daily
average (mg/l)
kg/day kg/year
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 32 of 50
Table E.5(i): NOISE EMISSIONS - Noise sources summary sheet Unchanged
Source Emission
point
Ref. No
Equipment
Ref. No
Sound
Pressure1
dBA at
reference
distance
Octave bands (Hz)
Sound Pressure1 Levels dB(unweighted) per band
Impulsive
or tonal
qualities
Periods
of
Emission
31.5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K
1. For items of plant sound power levels may be used.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 33 of 50
TABLE F.1(i): ABATEMENT / TREATMENT CONTROL UNCHANGED
Emission point reference number :
Control1 parameter Equipment 2 Equipment maintenance Equipment calibration Equipment back-up
Control1 parameter Monitoring to be carried out3 Monitoring equipment Monitoring equipment
calibration
1 List the operating parameters of the treatment / abatement system which control its function. 2 List the equipment necessary for the proper function of the abatement / treatment system. 3 List the monitoring of the control parameter to be carried out.
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 34 of 50
TABLE F.2(i) : EMISSIONS MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS ( 1 table per monitoring point)
Unchanged except for SW2A
Add temperature at SW2A
Emission Point Reference No. : SW2A
Parameter Monitoring frequency Accessibility of Sampling
Points
Sampling method Analysis method/
technique
temperature
continuous
Walk to it
thermometer
No analysis
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 35 of 50
TABLE F.2(ii): AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS ( 1 table per monitoring point)
Unchanged
Monitoring Point Reference No :
Parameter Monitoring frequency Accessibility of
Sampling point
Sampling method Analysis method /
technique
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 36 of 50
Table G.1(i) Details of Process related Raw Materials, Intermediates, Products, etc., used or generated on UNCHANGED
Ref.
No or
Material/
Substance(1)
CAS
Number
Danger(2)
Category
Amount
Stored
Annual
Usage
Nature of Use R(3) -
Phrase
S(3) -
Phrase
Code (tonnes) (tonnes)
Notes: 1. In cases where a material comprises a number of distinct and available dangerous substances, please give details for each
component substance.
2. c.f. Article 2(2) of SI No 77/94 3. c.f. Schedules 9 and 10 of SI No 62/2004
Table G.1(ii) Details of Process related Raw Materials, Intermediates, Products, etc., used or generated on the UNCHANGED
Ref.
No or
Material/
TA Luft
Class 1,
Odour EU Lists I and II
(Tick and specify Group/Family Number)
Code Substance(1) 2 or 3 Odourous
Yes/No
Description
Threshold
Dangerous
Substances Directive
76/464/EEC
Groundwater
Directive
80/68/EEC
µg/m3 List I List II
+1294
List I List II
Notes (cont.): 4. The European Commission priority candidate list
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 37 of 50
TABLE H.1(i): WASTE - Hazardous Waste Recovery/Disposal UNCHANGED
Waste material EWC Code Main source1 Quantity On-site
Recovery/Dispos
al
Off-site
Recovery, reuse
or recycling
Off-site
Disposal
Tonnes /
month
m3 / month
(Method &
Location )
(Method,
Location &
Undertaker)
(Method,
Location &
Undertaker)
1 A reference should be made to the main activity / process for each waste.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 38 of 50
TABLE H.1(ii) WASTE - Other Waste Recovery/Disposal UNCHANGED
Waste
material
EWC Code Main source1 Quantity On-site
recovery/disposal2
Off-site Recovery,
reuse or recycling
Off-site Disposal
Tonnes /
month
m3 / month
(Method &
Location)
(Method, Location
&
Undertaker)
(Method, Location
&
Undertaker)
1 A reference should be made to the main activity/ process for each waste.
2 The method of disposal or recovery should be clearly described and referenced to Attachment H.1
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 39 of 50
Table I.2(i) SURFACE WATER QUALITY UNCHANGED
(Sheet 1 of 2) Monitoring Point/ Grid Reference: _______________________________
Parameter Results
(mg/l)
Sampling
method2
(grab, drift etc.)
Normal
Analytical
Range2
Analysis method
/ technique
Date Date Date Date
pH
Temperature
Electrical conductivity EC
Ammoniacal nitrogen NH4-
N
Chemical oxygen demand
Biochemical oxygen
demand
Dissolved oxygen DO
Calcium Ca
Cadmium Cd
Chromium Cr
Chloride Cl
Copper Cu
Iron Fe
Lead Pb
Magnesium Mg
Manganese Mn
Mercury Hg
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 40 of 50
Surface Water Quality (Sheet 2 of 2)
Parameter Results
(mg/l)
Sampling
method
(grab, drift etc.)
Normal
Analytical Range
Analysis method
/ technique
Date Date Date Date
Nickel Ni
Potassium K
Sodium Na
Sulphate SO4
Zinc Zn
Total alkalinity (as CaCO3)
Total organic carbon TOC
Total oxidised nitrogen
TON
Nitrite NO2
Nitrate NO3
Faecal coliforms (
/100mls)
Total coliforms ( /100mls)
Phosphate PO4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 41 of 50
Table I.4(i) GROUNDWATER QUALITY UNCHANGED
(Sheet 1 of 2) Monitoring Point/ Grid Reference:
Parameter Results
(mg/l)
Sampling
method
(composite etc.)
Normal
Analytical Range
Analysis method
/ technique
Date Date Date Date
pH
Temperature
Electrical conductivity EC
Ammoniacal nitrogen NH4-
N
Dissolved oxygen DO
Residue on evaporation
(180oC)
Calcium Ca
Cadmium Cd
Chromium Cr
Chloride Cl
Copper Cu
Cyanide Cn, total
Iron Fe
Lead Pb
Magnesium Mg
Manganese Mn
Mercury Hg
Nickel Ni
Potassium K
Sodium Na
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 42 of 50
Groundwater Quality (sheet 2 of 2)
Parameter Results
(mg/l)
Sampling method
(composite,
dipper etc.)
Normal Analytical
Range
Analysis method
/ technique
Date Date Date Date
Phosphate PO4
Sulphate SO4
Zinc Zn
Total alkalinity (as CaCO3)
Total organic carbon TOC
Total oxidised nitrogen
TON
Arsenic As
Barium Ba
Boron B
Fluoride F
Phenol
Phosphorus P
Selenium Se
Silver Ag
Nitrite NO2
Nitrate NO3
Faecal coliforms (
/100mls)
Total coliforms ( /100mls)
Water level (m OD)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 43 of 50
TABLE I.4(ii): LIST OF OWNERS/FARMERS OF LAND UNCHANGED
Land Owner
Townlands where landspreading Map
Reference
Fertiliser P requirement for each farm
*NMP must take account of on-farm slurry
Total P requirement of the client List _____________
TABLE I.4(ii): LANDSPREADING UNCHANGED
Land Owner/Farmer________________________________
Map Reference_______________________
Field
ID
Total
Area
(ha)
(a)
Usable
Area
(ha)
Soil
P
Test
Mg/l
Date
of P
test
Crop P
Required
(kg P/ha)
Volume of
On-Farm
Slurry
Returned
(m3/ha)
Estimated P
in On-Farm
Slurry
(kg P/ha)
(b)
Volume to
be Applied
(m3/ha)
P Applied
(kg P/ha)
Total Volume
of imported
slurry per plot
(m3)
TOTAL VOLUME THAT CAN BE IMPORTED ON TO THE FARM:
Concentration of P in landspread material - kg P/m3
Concentration of N in landspread material - kg N/m3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 44 of 50
Table I.7(i): AMBIENT NOISE ASSESSMENT UNCHANGED
Third Octave analysis for noise emissions should be used to determine tonal noises
National Grid
Reference
Sound Pressure Levels
(6N, 6E) L(A)eq L(A)10 L(A)90
1. SITE BOUNDARY
Location 1:
Location 2:
Location 3:
Location 4:
2. NOISE SENSITIVE
LOCATIONS
Location 1:
Location 2:
Location 3:
Location 4:
NOTE: All locations should be identified on accompanying drawings.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 45 of 50
ANNEX 2: CHECKLIST FOR ARTICLE 10 COMPLIANCE
Article 10 of the Environmental Protection Agency (Licensing) Regulations, 1994 to 2004 sets out the statutory requirements for information to
accompany a licence application. The Application Form is designed in such a way as to set out these questions in a structured manner and not
necessarily in the order presented in Article 10. In order to ensure a legally valid application in respect of Article 10 requirements, all Applicants should
complete the following checklist and submit it with the completed Application Form.
Article 10(2)
Section in
Application
Checked by Applicant ����
(a) give the name, address and telephone number of the applicant and, if different, any address to
which correspondence relating to the application should be sent and, if the applicant is a body
corporate, the address of its registered or principal office,
B1
/
(b) give -
(i) in the case of an established activity, the number of employees and other persons working
or engaged in connection with the activity on the date after which a licence is required and
during normal levels of operation, or
(ii) in any other case, the gross capital cost of the activity to which the application relates,
B4
/
(c) give the name of the planning authority in whose functional area the activity is or will be
carried on,
Roscommon CC
/
(d) in the case of a discharge of any trade effluent or other matter (other than domestic sewage or
storm water) to a sewer of a sanitary authority, give the name of the sanitary authority in
which the sewer is vested or by which it is controlled,
Roscommon
CC
/
(e) give the location or postal address (including where appropriate, the name of the relevant
townland or townlands) and the National Grid reference of the premises to which the activity
relates,
Dublin Rd
Ballaghadereen
Co Roscommon
162697E,294445N
/
(f) specify the relevant class or classes in the First Schedule to the Act to which the activity
relates,
7.2.1
/
(g) specify the raw and ancillary materials, substances, preparations, fuels and energy which will
be produced by or utilised in the activity,
Unchanged
/
(h) describe the plant, methods, processes, ancillary processes, abatement, recovery and Unchanged /
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:09
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 46 of 50
treatment systems, and operating procedures for the activity,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 47 of 50
Article 10(2) continued../
Section in
Application
Checked by Applicant ����
(i) indicate how the requirements of section 83(5)(a)(i) to (v) and (vii) to (x) of the Act shall be met,
having regard, where appropriate, to any relevant specification issued by the Agency under section
5(3) of the Act and the reasons for the selection of the arrangements proposed,
unchanged
/
(j) give particulars of the source, nature, composition, temperature, volume, level, rate, method of
treatment and location of emissions, and the period or periods during which the emissions are made
or are to be made,
Unchanged
except for
Section I
/
(k) describe the arrangements for the prevention or minimisation of waste and, where waste is
produced, the on and of site arrangements for the recovery or disposal of solid and liquid wastes,
unchanged
/
(l) specify, by reference to the relevant European Waste Catalogue codes as prescribed by Commission
Decision 2000/532/EC of 03 May 2000, the quantity and nature of the waste or wastes produced or
to be produced by the activity,
unchanged
/
(m) provide:
(i) details, and an assessment, of the impacts of any existing or proposed emissions on the
environment, including on an environmental medium other than that or those into which the
emissions are or are to be made, and
(ii) details of the proposed measures to prevent or eliminate, or where that is not practicable, to
limit, reduce or abate emissions,
Unchanged
except for
Section I
/
(n) identify monitoring and sampling points and outline proposals for monitoring emissions and the
environmental consequences of any such emissions,
Unchanged
except for
Section I
/
(o) describe the condition of the site of the installation,
unchanged /
(p) describe in outline the main alternatives, if any, to the proposals contained in the application which
were studied by the applicant,
Section I /
(q) specify the measures to be taken to comply with an environmental quality standard where such a
standard requires stricter conditions to be attached to a licence than would otherwise be determined
by reference to best available techniques,
unchanged /
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 48 of 50
Article 10(2) continued../
Section in
Application
Checked by Applicant ����
(r) describe the measures to be taken for minimising pollution over long distances or in the territory of
other states,
unchanged /
(s) describe the measures to be taken under abnormal operating conditions, including start-up,
shutdown, leaks, malfunctions, breakdowns and momentary stoppages,
unchanged /
(t) describe the measures to be taken on and following the permanent cessation of the activity or part of
the activity to avoid any risk of environmental pollution and to return the site of the activity to a
satisfactory state,
unchanged /
(u) describe, in the case of an activity which gives, or could give rise, to an emission containing a
hazardous substance which is discharged to an aquifer and is specified in the Annex to Council
Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused
by certain dangerous substances, the arrangements necessary to comply with said Council Directive,
unchanged /
(v) include any other information required under Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2008/1/EC of 15
January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control,
(w) include a non-technical summary of information provided in relation to the matters specified in
paragraphs (f) to (v) above,
Non tech
summary
/
(x) state whether the activity consists of, comprises, or is for the purposes an establishment to which the
European Communities (Control of Major Accident Hazards involving Dangerous Substances)
Regulations, 2000 apply,
unchanged /
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 49 of 50
Article 10(3)
Without prejudice to Article 12(1), an application for a licence shall be accompanied by -
Section in
Application
Checked by Applicant ����
(a) a copy of the relevant page of the newspaper in which the notice in accordance with article 6
has been published,
B8 /
(b) a copy of the text of the site notice erected or fixed on the land or structure in accordance with
article 7,
EPA did not
require as per
letterEPA/Applicant
on 07/04/10
(c) a copy of the notice given to the planning authority under section 85(1)(a) of the Act,
B8 /
(d) a copy of such plans, including a site plan and location map (no larger than A3), and such other
particulars, reports and supporting documentation as are necessary to identify and describe -
Unchanged
except shows new
outfalls
/
(i) the activity
(ii) the position of the site notice in accordance with article 7,
(iii) the point or points from which emissions are made or are to be made, and
Section I /
(iv) monitoring and sampling points, and
Section I /
(e) a fee specified in accordance with section 94 of the Act.
General /
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 50 of 50
Article 10(4)
Checked by Applicant ����
(b) A signed original and 2 hardcopies of the application and accompanying documents/particulars in hardcopy format
plus 2 copies of all files in electronic searchable PDF format on CD-Rom shall be submitted to the headquarters of
the Agency.
In cases where an E.I.S. is required to be submitted to the Agency in support of the application, a signed original
and 2 hardcopies of the EIS plus 16* copies of all files in electronic searchable PDF format on CD-Rom shall be
submitted to the headquarters of the Agency.
* Energy sector applicants = 18 copies
/
Hardcopies submitted.
/
CD version submitted.
/
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
IPPC Application Form V1/07
Page 20 of 50
ANNEX 1: TABLES/ATTACHMENTS A1 Non-Technical Summary B8 Newspaper Advertisement, Letter to Co Council E2.1 Site Drawing A3 + Surface Water Emission Points I2.1 Site Drawing A3 I2.2 Hydraulic and Temperature Calculations I2.3 Observations of temperature made on site I2.4 EPA Flow Data I2.5 EPA River Parameter Data I2.6 Mixing Zones I2.7 Aug 2008 Report on Nutrient contribution to surface water. I2.8 Lagoon Quality I2.9 Cooling Water Temperature I2.10 River Lung Ambient monitoring I2.11 Aquafact report on freshwater macro invertebrate assessment I2.12 Connacht Gold - Discharge Temperature
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
SECTION A NOI\ TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The change from the existing IPPC licence applied for in this application is tooutfall the cooling water to the River Lung. The existing licence has the cooling wateremission point to the West Drain and all of the monitoring taking place there. Thisapplication does not propose to change the existing situation except to have thetemperature read at the outlall to the River Lung instead of at the emission point to theWest Drain. It is proposed to pipe the West Drain across the Town Stream to the headof the existing open ditch. The purpose of this is to benefit fiom the natural coolingthat will occur in travel along the length of the existing open ditch out to the proposednew discharge point. The temperature of the discharge will nct exceed 27"C.
This application also contains details of the amended route of the final treated effluentoutfall pipe from the WWTP to the River Lung. A 700 mm diameter is used to conve),'storm overflow fiom a County Council site on the edge of Ballaghadereen Town.This pipe intercepts the treated effluent outfall pipe and carries its contents down tothe River Lurrg.
SECTION A NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The change from the existing IPPC licence applied for in this application is tooutfall the cooling water to the River Lung. The existing licence has the cooling wateremission point to the West Drain and all of the monitoring taking place there. Thisapplication does not propose to change the existing situation except to have thetemperature read at the outfall to the River Lung instead of at the emission point to theWest Drain. It is proposed to pipe the West Drain across the Town Stream to the headof the existing open ditch. The purpose of this is to benefit trom the natural coolingthat will occur in travel along the length of the existing open ditch out to the proposednew discharge point. The temperature of the discharge will not exceed 27°C.
This application also contains details of the amended route of the final treated effluentoutfall pipe from the WWTP to the River Lung. A 700 mm diameter is used to conveystorm overflow from a County Council site on the edge of Ballaghadereen Town.This pipe intercepts the treated effluent outfall pipe and carries its contents down tothe River Lung.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
'otiiffabh br ollfieosbi- kiiJhffi,-ffi
-iffi-'ffimmiaePunrcGarden. Fully Furnished. and a bridge/culvert with allChurch Local-Shop & Pub associated site works at3 mins walk. Appox 12mls Cloonarragh & DrumdaffRoscommon. l0mls Td, Co. Roscommon. I n l o v
Br id ie4th Ma'
Holcth,
Andb.
A mbt
Ourth
Fondlyher fanAnn iv rSacreRosccWednr10.30 €
Glenamaddy, 3 mls Signed: Kristian HanleyBallymoe. Tel:087 7674019 The planning application
LAlrEsBoRo/BALLyLEA iL?"if '1ioT"1# o^Ti
GUE HOUSE to let, lot of exceeding the reasonableextas, large garage and cost of making a copy, atback garden, 120 per the offices of the planningweek, Sw accepted.Ph: authority during its public0877583837. opening hours and that a
. PERSON,\L
'FREE 60 DayMemembership , l r ishSingles, Meet UnattachedPeople in Your area, FREElnfo Pack & DVD in plainenvelope!"081 8-3001 99.
r PHOTOGRAPHY
. PuBLrc Norrces
Ine applcalron.rTURF
TURF: PLOTS of Turf/Loads of Turf for Sale.Roscommon Area.Call:086-2721812
.VYEDDINGS
EVE'S BRIDAL,Massive Sale, BridalGowns Reduced. Deb'sDresses 507" otf.Gommunion Drsssss50% off. BridesmaidsDresses for Sale or Hire.Appointment only.0860301 097
ROSCOMMON TOWNdouble room available inmodern house/quietestate, Sharing with 2protessionals.All modcons.Please contact Eoinafter spm 087 2323695.
submission or observationin relation to the applicationmay be made to theauthority in writing on pay-ment of the prescribed feewithin a period of 5 weeksbeginning on the date-ofreceipt by the authority of
In lov ing memory o fGeorgina, late of Ballagh,Rahara . who d ied on24th April 2001.
For no-one knowsheartache
That lies behindsmtles.
No one knowsmany fimes,
we have brokenand cried.
We cannot brngold days back,
When we weretogethel
The family chainbroken now,
But memolieslorever.
Sadly missed by yourheartbroken Mother andFather, Mary and Frank.
Mass inRahara rch onSunday 09th May at 10o'clock.
It was apaning,
Too bitter to forget,,Those wlro'loved
dear/14,Are the ones who
forget,They say there is a
reason,They say time
hea/,Eut.neither time
reagon,hl/lll change the
we feelAlways remembered byyour loving brothers andsisters, Cathal, Sinead,Fergal, Sile and Padraigand her God-Son Daniel.
EAEmlag
I3rd Ardied 1(
WerCtito
Thethhz
eac,Wlth,
Noh.to
ourszte
whalaw
Outa,En,
l n lok
weu
W!a
,il,r,
vni
An
A;
tr 0Rf01h, rn*nry( sendcd
tr otio 6333383
Foreilovinlh i sch i ldOlivitson'rlawchildAnn ib e lChur8th c
lhttie ilevinCloonbrackna Ave.
RoscommonMobile:
(087) 2549737
Carrick-on-ShannonTel: (071)-9620084wwwlteaneysphoto.le
PE.TE"SCABSRoscommon
ffi- Contact -
Peter lynch086 8400002 orBrian MeGary,(087) 6190097
APPI.ICATION TOENVIRONilIENIAI.
PROIECflONAGENCY
FOR REVIEW OF
Connocht Gold DoiryIngredients (formerlyShonnonside MilkProducts Ltdl, Dublin Rd,Bolloghodereen, CoRoscommon, NotionolGrid Referende{162650E, 2944r0N)which is licensed fortreolmenl ond processingof milk, quonfity greoterthon 200 tonnes per doy(overoge volue on oyeorly bosisf under Closs7.2.1 Food ond Drink.ore opplyino for o reviewof theii liceice to omendthe dischorge poinis tothe River Luno.
A copy of the"opplicotiontor the licence moy beinspected or obtoinedfrom the heodquorters offhe Aoency os soon osprocfiioble ofter receiptby the ,.Agency of theoppilcoTron ror rnelicence.
TfiiiI<E
PAINTING & DECOMTINGCONTRACTOR
Alhleogue, RoccomrInterior & Exterior
Power washing - Paperhanging- Cwing-Artx
25 YEARS EXPERIENCE
Iel:()90
ccosszs i'ifiYillbbile: r
08684378r I
Aluminium I PVCFpcia, Soffit IGutters
Contact:taman Hegarty
ilobile:Patrick
Rlverslde Avenue,Roscommon.
(4th Annlversary)
Those we love dongo away,
They walk besideevetyday,
Unaeen, Unheard,But always nea4Always loved
forever dearFrom his lov ing wi feMaureen . dauoh te rCaroline and granison
%,ffiFrcm qs little os
gt69.0o incl. VAT
IAn
EAEmlilg
3rd AIdied 1C
We,cito
Thetb.hi
eac,w.th,
Noh~
toour
Site
wh6Iew
'OUla,Eno
In IdIe
weIiIi
We~
)WI;
J:f,,i
W~
,As
Forelovin!hischildOlivilson'!lawchildAnnibe IChUi8th (
In lovBridie4th Ma'
Hollth,
Andb~
Amb~
Ourth
Fondl}her fanAnniviSacreRosccWedn!10.30,
BUCKLEY, PatrickRiverside Avenue,
Roscommon.(4th Anniversary)
Those we love don'go away.
They walk beside useve/yday.
Unseen, Unheard,Butalways near,Always loved an
forever dear.From his loving wifeMaureen, daughterCaroline and grandsonSam.
In loving memory ofGeorgina, late of Ballagh,Rahara, who died on24th April 2001.
For no-one knows theheartache,
That lies behind ousmiles,
No one knows howmany times,
we have broken downandcried,
We cannot bring theolddays back,_
When we were at.together,
The family chain isbroken now,
But memories liveforever.
Sadly missed by yourheartbroken Mother andFather, Mary and Frank.An(liversary Mass inRahara Church onSunday 09th May at 10o'clock.
087-7619820
Tel: 090-6626946
Aluminium & PVCF~ciai Soffit & Gutters
. Contact:Farnan Hegarty
Mobile:
It was a suddenparting,
Too bitterto forget,-T"hose-wlnY!D~edyou
~1II.'=-tl~W.t'~~~~lilrl- dearly... Are the ones who can'tforget,
They say there is areason,
They say time wit.heal,
But neither time noreason
Will change the wawe feel.
Always remembered byyour loving brothers andsisters, Cathal, Sinead,Fergal, Sile and Padraigand her God-Son Daniel.
PAINTING & DECORATINGCONTRACTOR
Athleague, RoscommonInterior & Exterior
Power washing - Paperhanging - Coving - Arta
25 YEARS EXPERIENCE
Tel:090
6663828 [Mobile:
0868437811
MikeKeavelfe
EVE'S BRIDAL,Massive Sale, BridalGowns Reduced, Deb'sDresses 50% off,Communion Dresses50% off, BridesmaidsDresses for Sale or Hire.Appointment only.0860301097
MAC'sCATERING
TM Tradmark QualityTherese: (087) 2961085
All Occasions'110'"
•0wisIenilgs •ConIIUlions•CommaIions •Wons •Weddi1gsRefrigerated Deliveries
Email: ·@Iive.ie
-TURF
-WEDDINGS
TURF: PLOTS of Turf!Loads of Turf for Sale.Roscommon Area.Call: 086-2721812
Mattie NevinCloonbrackna Ave.
RoscommonMobile:
(087) 2549737
srnallads CIroscommoncharnpion.il'
PHONE-------------- -
090 6625051FAX
090 6625053
ROSCOMMONCHAMPION
ADVERTISING
PETE-SCABSRoscommon
- Contact Peter Lynch
086 8400002 orBrian McGarrl_
- (087) 6190097
I GRfG/~1-.1 HackneyiC Service
I 087Cl6333383
and TrikesaTon Mini-Dlggers For
Hire. self Drive
Fuertr. RoscommonPhone (090) 6625862
Wedding PhotographerCarrick-on-ShannonTel: (071)-9620084www.keaneysphoto.le
APPLICATION TOENVIRONMENTAL
PROTEcnON_AGENCY
FOR RMEW OFEXISTING LICENCEConnocht Gold Dairy
Ingredien~s (forme~lyShannohslde MilkProducts Ltd!, Dublin Rd,Ballaghadereen, CoRoscommon, NationalGrid Reference .(162650E, 29441 ON)which is licensed fortreatment and processingof milk, quantity greaterthan 200 tonnes per day(average value on ayearly basis) under Class7.2.1 Food and Drink,are applying for a reviewof their licence to amendthe discharge points tothe River Lung.
A copy of the applicationfor the licence may beinspected or obtainedfrom the headquarters ofthe Agency as soon aspracticable aher receiptby the Agency of theapplication for .the
licence.
- PUBLIC NOTICES
- PHOTOGRAPHY
Ivan Keaney
"FREE 60 DayMemembership , IrishSingles, Meet UnattachedPeople in Your area, FREEInfo Pack & DVD in plainenvelope!'0818-300199.
- PERSONAL
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
Enterprise House, Centre Park Road, Cork, lreland.
Tel. 021 -4314388 Fax: 021-4314369
E-mail: mescal@indigo ie
www.mescal.ie
The SecretaryRoscommon Co CouncilThe CourthouseRoscommon
me5cal &ASSOCiAICS
C O N S U L T I N G
E N G I N E E R S
301041r0
Dear SirRe: Connacht Gold, Ballaghadereeen - IPPC Licence
Application is being made to the EPA for review of their existing revised licence,under section 90 of the EPA Acts 1992 to 2007.Attached for your information is copy of newspaper notice.
Faithfully Yours
---*l---*--*Ll---*rL( J I t'e
Michael Mescal
c. EPAConnacht Gold
Directors: M. Mescal BE, MASc, C Eng, F1El, MCIWEM, M Cons Ei K. Mescal. Mescal & Associates Ltd. VAT No.: 1E8229001V REG No.: 22900'1
Enterprise House, Centre Park Road, Cork, Ireland.
Tel: 021-4314388 Fax: 021-4314369
E-mail: mescal@indigoie
www.mescal.ie
The SecretaryRoscommon Co CouncilThe CourthouseRoscommon
30104/10
Dear Sir
meSCaL&associates
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
Re: Connacht Gold, Ballaghadereeen - IPPC Licence
Application is being made to the EPA for review of their existing revised licence,under section 90 of the EPA Acts 1992 to 2007.Attached for your information is copy of newspaper notice.
Faithfully Yours
, ,
; .. \ ( \A( J t L ........----------~ ...'~---~-Michael Mescal
c.EPAConnacht Gold
Directors: M. Mescal BE, MASc, C Eng, FIEI, MCIWEM, M Cons EI K. Mescal. Mescal & Associates Ltd. VAT No.: IE822900lV REG No.: 229001
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
ATTACHMENT E2.1
Surface Water Emission Points
Code Location Easting Northing
SW1 Final Effluent 162688 294549
SW2 West Drain 162696 294572
SW2A Cooling Water Drain 163427 294807
SW3 Lagoon Discharge 163238 294702
SW4 Before Pumphouse 163204 294523
SW5 After Discharges 163205 294645
Roscommon Co. Council Final Effluent 163196 294626
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
-c.alul4hso-+rlvposes ih g -d"ar,ro ol rs J-,vrl"J-ul-o two
-Sr--f,oJ".+ both th.- hyhdulics -and l.em,,ualyrc crcha nX.L. .,, -
art- -bX---Sr.)-.o9 the hydvavtli-c-a f." Sg--.,lnt-.' -A: Berrrlo-rn3 a. T"p tnlqf<-r Lwc,\ (rw r-) 4| Pt . N
)tu ej,,anne.l wrJt'ta rs J. onn {hra,rlfrou* {he- chc.n,"e-l .
Itt-e.. fnaxrrv\u(n fio^, , Q , g rr/ en bg Co^n^cht_ ga t d rb
5go *t I f,rc,-
Uss t lann,n{s E luohon tb +,^d thc, s lopc, L , assv}nrr r r j \
Twu@ B - - b l ,gZE.
{ ^ .l\^^.'. rn5s Ettu*f,on
O= \ i1 .A R.?'4A
!z
TwL = bi,4*
-38G5lrr -:r'l!rd \.\eryl.fl-a}: -fi. . ? iT_:,:rAr,qcr+uewfEZ;[
\
s fiu '&d;D,jrL' ,o - W^lta-AnJ,'h o n,s-
P+. g P}. AT-'!al!-i: !.1,3q1
nrf ;c-ilso
C) =-'[ =
A=Q=
L
ho*, . ts{ou}wa--r-A- C.o
O.Ob, ,a.,.fura\
&rgA ., t\'
\4.*"f^^- (*J,w:- , t\
' .zl-I*out-
cl.a*r..o-,
- ~
- ------j-------- -~~-~/clJlohon_s ~y :Bac-~j)jJ:CJ, I IlL vJmt-e.:r tv,,_dlohot?s__
---w.r£-;,-------.
TWL ~ ",q.~CJI.,
-P~o e PL A
LW_L..-=- ~9~ 30 I1--~====-=---....:....---~....:::=.::=~2-----====.=..:.--__5I T'N L--;-" ~. So
__+Fe;(__~utL~--P-\AVpO~e..5 the.. _c.ho-lIDe..\ \~ _d-.!~cLtJ~t_o two
____ pcM±S --!ir-:£truL~9-both th<. hy ~~IJ Iic.S _and +.!.rop-VL01lL(~ ~)(c.h() no<-- ° _
_( ~~t>.y'L_ b_~ h~~j'y\_~ Jhe.. h~ dvo-lAlli-S ~ (" S~~ho C\..._ ~ - 12>
-1ct.$f:>Vl'0Y~\~} 0-. To? wc(h~X" Le.-\le.-\ (TW L) ~+ Pt. ~ = <O~. 30.
~'" c.10M\e-\ WIdth I~ J.OM H\{ov~\'ou+ lhe- (h",,~d.
Ilh~ (\,\o..)(.IMV(y\ -Row) QJ ~\vtv\ b'1 Lo1"\llCLt.h.1- qold t~
l.\ ~o ~?, ) ~rJ__
""h -- '{o\JJ\.-.\~~ c...o~'
0- 0 :::> "1AC'+.J (01.\ c. \, o. \\ "'-lV'J
A ::: (X.'t -Lo... ~~ '"2...)
Q. =- ~ C) '"~'-C \"<>...6 ~ \l..J~ J -\. \
"t.- ~ ~-u..\
IU~~ 1'V\~V\Y\\Y\.~~ E"vo.nof'\
ITW\.-.@ ~-:. \c,'·32.5.
I!
0 ._---
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
9{gooooo 'o)
' l
I;iII- 1Ml i
Eiot 'u1 a \* o9t x
tfo sto'o -" /* bzo'o :
.H \ 9 ,6 r , , " u 6 ) . l : t l ,O ' : -
-{ ot, 'bl = eJ 1d 6
9+E ooooO 'o
-'l ' oAotS f . 'J
zw L\ 'h
4./-f o-rh
-,((eCz'zl - b\-" \ ' 9q'o x 8\oo'E =
=w ' o',tV -- V
,u! / r ,
' *oB = O
A ' A1'3o 1a1 f ol
(Zruo:c1 ; f ---
VT-'A
bo'E ;-t -- ?
-- w--:Y){i wr,n4 f "t"ln-:-Md M/
-*---7-'sn ry% ?Il^rr?Afl- 'BrY -
oL'n)+-
q 'E= f
-v
-q9*:Ua-: fllL
V +d.1NLL
,J1", ,u" i*;i&.*
-rt I o oo,lg,?fw 91 ' fo\
' r i :
'^ , ,:*i;{;*; ' Ct*b-
9t9'bl =g ' rd
J...\.~_ __--=----=-=c
-1--------
______uf2.=LPw -------
-j-=-S.c....:e..e.-C-h-"-'=o:-:....("l-'.--._A_-~_--------_--
:',~n(LA_,,~,~Jy(WIic..eo.Jiv.S)_g____________A-::Ace..o...J-(r)"2-_
P'N~\-\1~.;~hcJPt,v,meJif_,M
(
R:.~)(~.0"_______~~(2.o~)(1)
Q::t\O\I\J)VV\1/1,Y'
A-=-~(eA)M'-
I\j~L-\50(VI~I~.c=-\0"1-.10~MIf,..\-=:.0.029MJ5t'-O.09t)ttl""'-\\\~"""2.3lcDOIJ..1J~I\..
\J1·L1~R7.JSYz. :::L-~
)..
-v'I~
.Glx
,~V3) L-=""V\-\.'"\C\.::
2
~0.oC\~~O,()S-:-\.L.\~-Cz.·'2-1"43)J
O,000003'9-S
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
T w L = L q , q 5 L-=--h3.3 o-l
-- F,". J A.,rn *y,Jr^t^It --€*J-r-os--**R'----ors!)-cs-\ Y\A
P-L- c s4.--L1 .t{ o' -- -,
& ' l '12 , F t
- Jr 0, t '2)
tr*. )
v= &A
V = \6r^11hr2- l - L
!.\0.', Lg , V
O
A?row , * t l t^,
,Aa-o. , f..L
Jqq. oJ / f i .
3va - l L .
V
L
F,"J Slope., u
" Ul x e?z *',J'-1n
= (V r o.ob + l .q1
= o, oooDtgl
Twu @ Pb C. = lo1 ,3or
:- g"tJ
\,q1 -- 0. igv'\ f
= uq. 3t{- (o.oooort l xsso)
" ,
___-l- J:_o,_~sl, ...
_ _ . __ . b::.-:~.• ~
Pi:. f?:>_ ~I-~ \0'\·301
~LSS. __,_
-1;1--:t-S -- ---...--
_____-!_s_e.._e-h 0 ('\ ~ - c.... _£\~ d~,,~ lt~ d(~_~",- ----eo.di_v~ , Q'-1-J----'O"......,,5"'--'S_~.:'_~L~ ") .~ _
_______ __1\_11...I-",'- G_ p~ C. ~__1c9_~ 1...\_0 .__
Q - A-::~----
__'xN _A :: A~:c ..~ > (VI~ . _,_
Pw ~ W_.l.B,(...J Pe..V·\Mt-'rq-., _ 'IY\
R ::_~_J.".J,_
J ~ ll, I '\( 2. ')
\/ :: Q
AQ ~ t-\ ow M
1 I ~ r
A ~ A"-LeA.. "fV\"l-
,1()~. S9 ~ J0c3 'ceo N) ~ r
\j \ ,., ~ 2./3 ' Yz.-:: R ~ 'v)(.
~
0~~
l ': (). oS - 1·L49 - R1(~)
O.OOOCl~~
TV\ll G PI:: c.. '= 109. ~Ol +- (0.0000 l'fs~ )( 350)
69. 2> I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
-.1g tr8l .
of- Ja/.I-*
o I ,-ryta- - -=- t . o,3 nr ! -Z*ts -!-3-b-o n',,,----?- ,,aZl n^j
-A =- g 'o+6- r* , - f - - L ,g l Fh-
{ s,.\a-$os \..""-
L-e>t= \L
a
: -tat.J
\bo"F I t^r
= \'UP-3'
. L !,n. Jc-qA,0
\ / = !6Lon, , * , - '
O= F"o-, * ' *31 I ' r
= O. o to t ) * \ t
uq {^*l a*1
h-At-- Volor\r\4- ,
K.,*\VOO
u5a5-_:-3\to n^=/t^-.
3
^-" / 0-.
3g-ls11 */r*,\
= o. \3{ Ja1i<-,
~ - A =
___c. __- ~ ~ _b4, 3 \ - 10 fL 8' _ -= Q-,--a:~d.
__ _bN~J)~~ .'. 0_, co \ -\- \' '0 S :; _\ \_o_~ N\ "- '3. ~~ ~_"2..-
---- --
\ . S ~ ~ '2. to_=-_ _~ _,,-0 ""TS M _!,- ~. ~ \ -8-
.l
_.AJ~ Vb \\) Me.-': ;;l, (;)"+ S '" L'tV' ~_~ 50 IV'.. - \ U.~ 'l. ' co """~
De,\- Q.......~o""
c...-\:::>t:. \l
- -Q
=
~-A
t -- ':i- \j ~ VA \ \j fV'.1I- I tv'3
Q Q ~ Sov..:> ~? / ~~
:: \'-\ S d. .S -~
""\~O N\~ I~("
- --------~- ---- - - - - ---
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
"t,t: v . 4 . r 7 ' - a j
5 i/ l b
Tennp"nftare Co\cr,,.\".\.o-[s tt= - gosL -Nk)"' ^,.n Wr vr\l{-G-^,-E-\sas u r,,n\ t"X,orQ .,!. l,r.lc , br. -Quclho n t,l I
-$cn* ---\LnJr^shr,q\ (lqtcr P't\"tr on -Grfool , EJ L),+r oA r
t. 1.rt: I.' -*
? l - - \f Sw- ro)
___fe:,qvrarrf Q, 1. t\r l t \
+. so\rte -*sr Tw qrves'.J
Tl w
TW = Bo.sror T"*pt".^|rrrc- , "F
\
T; = L'.Qt o,.^f \rJalrr Tv*Fr*{..ocg, ".F
tTo- --
Aa+rn Arr Teqpcol-'se, o V
' = \3 { coe-QQ\cre-*.'t Rrofor\onA.\\ $*.}o. c-o^tcLr.r\\^l
\, t-^"h - franst.-r qoe-tticrt,wt , Sng sur fcr c-c- q( e-a-
lncx e-c. il- t.g, ".'.. cx<-r a\or\ e{ur1v....n-,-.,t , c^--J r,.;.\^.)
a-* \ t.-. * ', \ ' ,V3. $r rr.J.*;q_6 .o,^{,.\ro N S Wrr- lO .
il.sf S.,\, "
T*, k. S.,-\. o n L - fS .
TwrIt
i\j r ;i-ri t o .
t=?=
= bog . !
O . o i€?
\o
15 " r 1've^ \o1 C.o^nc.c-h I Cf "[ J
"{to F ou3. t"^p.,rotu,rcs fworrn Oc.f +r: /.,\arc,L
S,v. . - \ " j Me-f Ei -o. .^-
t-T*
4o'6,
-------1-------
__._ -__ I---,~,-"",em~p~ Co.\c..u..\~nof\~ _~_ ~i:Lo..(,..~ \'J\n.,b'..AI" w.\ ",k_
_Co~~' ~o~5 ~~_ t~~£_J. W-J-~' ~)Jo.ho", T.\\ -- -- ---_kOM \V\~\~\ WQ.t<K ~\\lA.t()" _~f\±r_oll 3(d [i>·\-t-\C{\ •.
--- ------
---- ------
Ea. "1-. \-- --- --,t -:: \\..- - T""
! ('W_-~CA)
__~,<~o..",~ ~L}' \\
---_._---
__Iw_~ bTL 1" Jt To..
~" Jt
Tw
I\':)
Ti.t
:: ~o-.s.'1f\ T~\'V\~,I(CA...-\-u.Y"~ ) OF
~ ~<AS , '" \J L~~ J ~\""
~ LV\~\\')V'i'\t- Wo..t{.1( \~fV'~~\e... J <:l~
';. E0-5\V\ \)~\~,'-~o" \,~) cl~~~
~ l'>\tJ)..v\ h\~ \{.~\o-.-\-~'I\e.) 0 "\='
\~ c... C.Ol!..\f,c.:.,(..~~ ~"o~o~"o('\cS.\-~ k-~\ '-..O"\-CA..\.V"W\~
~e.. tu..o.r -tvO-V\s,"o(...'\ c..Dc..fuc.:\~",-," l ~e SIA"t~~ O-(e.....o-
\,..v\.u- ~CJ,. ~ \- '\ 0 (V"\. 0-.~ 0-...~o l"\ eJ:tQ \ ~ ~N\,.T) 0.. '-"'- J ......v \V'. d0..-........ do ~v.. V\.'\.'\ ~ " \--J. y::; or '\J'..J. V\ \- (..1(" LO V\. ~ \.~ 0 1'\ '::> \Jv~ \ 0 .
c-~.
~ \,,~ \o~ c..o'f"\l"'\.C\..~ t q 0\ do..v~. +-~p~o.ht(C.S tvoM O~J +-0
"",-
5\V~ \c j Me.+- '[ \A..L.<A.l'"\ {\ -
D.O~""t
\0
- 3. 3~ ~t---::... o'S°c. "'- "So~
':. So c.. "- y\ 0 F
I ~,~\-!i
iiI
IiI
I
lb1
ITt,i\0..jI
i!it ~
: t- =
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
l",1'*.q'{', V /r,
L1I)
3. 3\o ! ,Lr9 Lg-.a-hl)
t_--3o.o rc
o\p -*S-"lvc. T; f-o,.''-- -S-e...\-o-.r- b-A-
b.fr_
fu-I*-
\ =
Ti
I.ti
t r , 8\- r w
- La-
= O !
: lo
Ftfto "^
\-
t3 q
c-13L-95
8t- .o?-o Y
\ t o F
J*.-t*
Sr*-J.. o .. rS - A= (r . . t u gu. oz)_* ( to * o. ,sq " { r )
t . r r + Ltoro.rrq)
T* S"Tw
t.\5
18. ur" F ' \ ' ,5 ,90 C-
F ', o) T.* pero fu re I e.ov , 3 B".c-k bit.\"- J r. ,,."..5
\A),^fsnr to^L,ttons ts eb.l 'C : $rvtn obove.Lcsngrro.\l:ct- a'-) \l
sou*-!.,r-c. cl s-o) ft-o.,\6 .
-- - -----
___I-T..L...''IJ:'I ~~ _ ~e.. ....,,"o<,,- e--- ~______ _ ___+ T'N __ ~ (3. ~L. ~ ~S J _T (,\0)( .O~_O~I.._~_~\)
a. '?> \.0 ~ L\0 ')(._,0. C'-9.1-')
------
3L.\~.\o"1-
l1 . 0 0 _
,..... 30 Or._. - 0-1".,;
----- -- - ._._-------, -------
TV'l t-e \ _St..~~ 0 '\'\. .~ -=-A _-= b \, t- J ~ T ~ _ _
b r f\-"
t> ':; ~ , ~\ ~t
T, ':: \w trOM ~ C-~ ~ ~I..o . 01...t:J ~
1:0- ~ 1..0.- ~ ~ c...-~ ~ 11 \ 0 ~
t ;. 0\ \ '3 ~ d~~
J ":. \0
\l:::. - A8\0. 02') i- (, D x D. \ 3 L-\ )I. ~ \ ')
~. ~ \ ~ l \0 '/. O. \ '3'-\J
f"; Y\ oJ Tt YY'I p.e..-'<" 0 tVJe- l eo. V \ (\ !j \So..c...\<. D',-t-c~ <0 V\ \ '"'~
W\I'\.+-~j\r 0.JJ i\ cLvt-lo (\~ , $ ~ '0, ~ 0 L ) ~ \'oJ L-'(\ o.bo \Ie...
\-~""'~v\C>...~\'L- o..--d 4~ i'~c.. <...0 ~~ \.~ S .
- ._--- -------
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
r',1, .: l' 1!:aq'j:T#-tit -, tl "iifi'.E i.1: rt":i,i, |l;ffi
* / , ,
h I u,,ilohan-1_-]}1v- t -Back--Dt!--:.m- Sunnnn u-6oJ h o a5,'
ng lL. *So-mmc-r, e'8-!\ai1--o-o"S'- ,q Qt-o^str^nt
ss the. \<ry$, o+ fl".--Jjf-ch-\^/^s -a'6sonn-eJ
B'.1 usrn$ , -t!.. "hAann La6-€quahan ,--lhe-
reSr"led +" 0' \15.-t-_-o-.15.
dalh wqs
lAann rn3 s
0:
o, \5Wr d { ! r
S.lu.\Ast vr3
tar.rahon
ll1.A.P1'"*1n
G"' . '^ ' .chf ( ; tD\J ,"g
Q)',\-..\ , Z *.
E1*,,ohrr.t t S''.) {\ 'c
U\a . SB 5.
$\ow , e-f s
vovShrtss crr.SFi cie-,rf
o .o 5 nqL^ta) c'ha,nne
Are-q , t* "
HVJ"o.r\ i . eoJ,.rs, Ft
St rg,c
'l bo =/u,
S\ o1e , '",
.O='1A =
=
A=( =
3\ve!"\ b3
"t G.-.L
f iann r nJs
G TwL =
Aug . Dcpl{" o\ f5o--k \ '\')^
\oro. t lS - UU, .-tO = o. \q5 .\n ^r o' b 31 $+
Au3 Uoss S".-ho o A .n-^ , A
I I ^ - qt lI l9 . te6
A= z7o ' \15
t | = o.3n-c-zt 4
---1------ .
--J1Y-~Jic- Ca /WItA."hOfLS_~- --- -- ---'Qt~ . - -
_ . 7 Tw l- :: ~~. ~"I IS _. j')t~ 6 __
'7 -"'LWL ~.lolo •. 8~-O
----
_ ~C (plUA\C\hY\~ ~c. 'S0IYWV'l.eA' (..ol"lo_'\\Q""6 J c?-. (..onsThnt
_d~pTh _Q-QXO$S t~~ k,X\JI'h of- ~e..._d.i~d/'\._ Wo.,'6 ._a.~SvMe...C>
~t 0: \5 . B"\ US\V\~ The.. -'Vv\ltrmfll_~_E.qVAhOf) ~~
de.pth W~7> re-t-'V"le.d +0 o. \"10.
Q :: t-\OW c-t ~I
"YI :. YOV~'nne55 ~e..4-i c.....\'e..Y'\t
-: O. 0 ~ <\o..+\A:vo- ) Q;"-'o. '(\ (I eI
A:: ~'("eA ~ 7-I
'R ~ \-t ~ d(" (AU \ -\ C f2.o-.cL us J ~
'-' -=- Slape..
IQ I \5 ~\ve\'\ ~j ~nVlClc.~1- Gu \d o-S '-\:'0 fV\?)~ '(1 vI,oJ..~\ 0'" ~c-c:.X \:)\~c...,~ 2 ~.I )
ISo\"~ 1{V\ 0. 'II \'\ \ \'\~\.s E~ v o.hG\'\ h ~"'d ~\. e.. S\ ope. I L.J! \
\).~\ V\~ (\ TV-J L _. \.0 \0. e?; S .
{\"3 . Dt?+~ 0\ bo.-G¥:- \::>\~
~~ . ~9 S - ~ I~ ,1-"0 = 0, \ q CO tV\ r-- O. to 3"\ 1M-
A= 2)( O.\~S
O:-~~- N\.:.-'- .__ _ __.._
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
lir,t{ffit' .'F,;t:' **r;**[^J' 'uso K-e- A-fs
R= A ^ ZA -- -Afec\= oD--
-Bu=- W-gJlgl- Po., *.tsr ) .t$
R : - t-lq.rrl- .- --O-_,-.\b 3 rrn,-:--Q-.535 FhI t (o.tqs" 2)
a---8"---
{"\oi, fg-,V e, A-tS
Q=
A=_qA
Wfuo, 31n+
C r . .
f . ]i \oOC - t- , V,
l i t
I *q gz/g .l r | | . R
//V L:t .\ l .q "1
f \o*, ,uo/s
O\vec\ , s-
!!5 3-:$b nn I tnr - =3rooo
"rr./ffr:
o, 32-l n /,sw l .oS f t / t
V
E^J
\t =
L=
A-s
'Yz-
\ae%\
)
= ( \ .05 . o_.os_l. 'r1
o. obgL
O. ooz-Eb
Aoo. , . . ^ = f .oo
@ p+ B ? ut .s16 t 2.oo = (ot .8qB
. o 53s'6)z
=
l =
Lv
I W l -
" '
A-= A(' eo- -.I fV:I~- -- -
_~::. W.trJt~,t J)exUYld'v-) N\
~ ':. _.:l ). _. b , \ 0., S
___________, ~ t_0JQs)l 2 'j
\j ::. Q
AQ:: t\0 W ) (V\~ ) sA -:: CAy {G\ M 'J-
J
\l s_~ :.~S MJ ~'("
3\coo I,U..C..) ~ r
0.32.1 fY\)S
A- \, 0 S tTl s
~~cl S\oPc. ) 'L Q, A-&
\/ \' ~C\ • ~2h ' '17-= . \...
-"'V\
l, -=. (~ . "'"V\ . e.'I" )2...-.\ ,t1 q
.L
1..0, O~O
0, OO'2.~~
... ".. - - --- ._--
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
':1ffiff..{xt11'*t*.'" 'ry
n l[rar-- t ,"- )*y- -
_v_a
V : *Vr-\u ^*,.*1Q = FLo*:-,-tfJt-t
H\bOn
j/ t^a,.
= o .LoU L-
Jtt t^"/ /a*:S,
~ - ~ ----+---~--~--~
--f-------
o t- \r.J~ \-<-V- ~ %--=-&.~~-rh -:. O. \'\S M x.~.o.""," ')( 1-00 M
-=- .:l t- ~ M "'!>
--- --- -
__ ~ ~_t :: .:LQ
\j ~ ~ \rO \V_~__JJ·V\~ , ~
Q -= t"\<Lv-) ('/'.~/ ~\
--:;. 0.\..:,0\0 ~ ...
JLi tvv Id~
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
i.r fi:::,.',:,tr- U. :- <'
Ian+,earatvc€- L\.*\^\o-o s f* !go.g ls,t<.h' ,",- *S-\r-rarnsr(p-n-d-rtupn s u.a \r\3 f-.-krn{_-\)-.,61.--h.- Ev4hon ,_1.-\l_-tqg* - \.n.D,r s\\ *\ \Jofcx Rttuho o -.C"urrtro\ , gJ L) ;-hol,
Eq, 1.\tt
A+-at,ro^"3r- E1. 1.l l |t ' so\v,e. S. Tw 1rvcs \
ebtsrL
i r : . !
a . t
r lb
(
T*\
I i
tTo,
PJ
\ = D.u31 +tTLT". = )oo c- - LB" F
= f3os,'rr Tr-gzrolure, , o F
= [3oc 'r. D"t* , {+= l-$\ue^f \lo.fer
--\.^g"r^t*rre,, oF
= B.^srn bctcn\on t^*,r., )*^il*=
$lan ,\.n T.r*prratur<- , oF -
= I t q. c-rr c(t \ ci cvr.Y ys o\os t\ ocr c*\. !."5 S o*-\ s r
Co ': \^. * .. *\ \\1r f.**t - tror ,n st<-r <-o .tti <, <. .t ,\- $ottc,-C-r- c^.A-!-crs \w,(-,,\-LAA-(-
\rLovr . C^r-^-".-dOff
alyaf**J, ^*S r^)t^), **) t-^^"*^-) -\ . \+-L
S-,^* lv\.! r L-o.*) t \totr-1 .,,tA/l-L ({
C "
So\u ,- Q-. T* t-. lgaho n N - \
3\{ Q,r/\ b1 Co^r,..o.L. t 6o\A
oul. le,mper6qJsue. ko... At" h S.tl
$rvun q 'f\&t 6,^o-r*.ru.
lrr - I^,_
f (r* -r-*)
i = ,:.:'= '*t-
_~l
----- -----------
_____ T~eKo;\yfe.. ~\(.)A'@_O_nS__~~'Te.-~ \ \Y1_S~
_________U>-CL~-hQ{\~ ~ \'C\~-1..y"'VA~g~~ ~_-~vo..ho~-lL_
__ _ ~~o~ __ \"'()u ~"'\ 0.-\ W~.:hx R\ \v'h.o ()_~1:Yo\ I 6f~ t.Y.±XO/)_o __--------- ---------
1. \\
_~_t__ _ T~ __ ~ _k_____ __ ~ S(Tw -J-~J
.I\.L -()..I\.I\(A~~ e~. 1. \\
(_-Cw -;:: ~ TL + _ Lt T~
t> ~ ft
Go..~,~ T~mp..e.V"o.ture...) ., t
6o..~ \""' \)~~) t+~t\v~ \- wc..-te-, 'k YY'lp~(C\\-vre,) o~
B~S , f\ \')~\- ~V"\-\-\. Q .c'\ ~ ""'-A.,1 d0tvv-o.V\ A\A \<fi1'?-L'f~~\<"'} Q~
\~ CA. c..o L~ 'c.:, CL ""-'" ?,o,\OC\' 0,"" ~', \-~ ~"'I..-\- t>,CC"'-\-o...''i'- \~~ ~ ~eo..'r - \-,<-",v--.~~~'("'- (p~~'u~"",,\-)
~ ~.;:)"~c.v<:..L ~"'- \.~ ~O"'" ~CA..--h..o"
e.-'\r'f" ~J, ().. "'-~ W \ --- 6 ~""-~ L v\A.A. d ~v.q- .~c:n...
~"""~" ~p,,,,,,,d\lc\.o,,,-~ ~ 40.
Tw :::
~ =
L.l.. -;
t- o;
TCA~
f ::
O. "0 '3~ ~\
35°,-, "- 9S°r
d.Oo c.. "- l,~C)F
~ \ ..~ ~ lO(\f'\CAe.-h. ~ o.o\Jo.\I~, i-U"" ru-o....h .>\<... ~O<V'\ AfY' ~ St..ft
5\"VV\ ~ ~ WCA..M(\.).
-.-- -- ---
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
.r .'fj$ir$itljl_ :#)r:-
- -Lt --Sr"*..ro R :A
(-q.-r"eq I 1S!-L,1g" o,o-"-g ,. Gt\-_o*,uBq + Ltp l_o.__qtb_)
-__\ , L 51
F__:_ _ )_5-9,' c-
--E",ol Tcrnpe,vafurc. \eav ,r.3I 8",.1 i\, F.l"'S .>* . ,n . - - ,s co* . ) r \o { \S _u t - }6 , t ' C- ,
o\ "..l
g \ c-^.q-6- o-\ \) I c o.".- \ tj) .,-*^-Ql c
J . l c rn l
g !v c-n \-{^-
,.-o".. ) .\ O.na .
HI\'0
Tv\( ~ (o,_~'3~ x q~J ~ L'-\ 0" O,o.'-~ )t 6~)
___ ~.\.~~ ~ L~ D ~ _0----9~_C":? ')
--------
----- ~ \~_~ _'_ ~_o t":>
\,'-o~~ -------
_____ _In cd Tt-rt'Ipe-V'o:\'v, '( L.. \ -e.CA.v \~:J \ I?:>().c.k \':), h:..h\ a\ ur,~ ~S I.:l i"'"' ............~ Co '" ~ "~ 0 l', ~ .....\A d. ~ .~ c> (." ) ~ l \r e....f\ ~
O-~e.lue.. \~,<",,\(~e....-\. -JIC,.. o...~ 6 ~cl~c... L-t:>~ ~ ~~6--{\~.
I
I!
IiI
Ij1ijIII
IIi!
Iiii!
- ---._-_. - -- -- -- - ----
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
' ':i?r;;;'.'.r,.t' ': :'r-n1l"3i. iii.:-:i
r-hqoal h6"-rnle,r -&,^-J- i ! i -onsurtUo--
3,e!, j_kq r o.ob?)
= --3-tH,--l_tr i ____ . ?9 . _L " F tw ,b. l-o_(_
_,.|,8_o-2{
T*, a t, ' ,-, " l . . t l t tb .g l + ( r " x o . rsL f
' \
G^J rh on5 w, l ' [^. f ' 5
. l l " , = (3.3b.q5) ' (S . o.
3 '3U*(trc.ob?)
33J,q35 :10, lot3.1q 5
b8. b- ' F ^/ aO. ' l 'g
3p, ) 'g
rSt.qQr3. ' {1
W, ',,f.t
R
13 -A
Tw= (t- ' t , x qo,\ ) v (s, o.r3r r qr )
b.?t * (Sx 0. r3, { )
bl 1,05]1. '16
= (5 . -+"F ^J 21 ioC
~ (3 .3/0 ~ '\s) 1"" (2.0 ')l 0.0 (g~ ~ '-\ \ ')
_____ 3.3 \., ~ _~ 2.0 'K 0.0'0"")
A
Tw ~ (~.<? I )( 1l:l..\.:.) \- ('2.0)< o. \31i )< "<:2Ie . <g \ + (2.0 "" o. \ ':, Lot \
h00o..1 I.~Fo__ .WI(\t-U C-o(\ ~~b 01"15
"A/I r', t-{.l" Co",d ,h o(\S WI H" f = 5~
T~ = (3. '36 )( qS ') 1- (S )( 0.010l- "K '-\1)
3.3~ ~ (S 'i C.Ol.o")- )
',,:I~;~~'~
AJdi
-- C.
------
---- f-------
Jb -- -~ --
-- ----
(..-
:: ( it, . ~ I 'JI. go. \ ') lr (S /. O. \ 3 ~ )( L.\ \ ')
~.<61 +-(S) O.\~'1)
ii1I
Ij\3-A
I TwIIiII!I
II;
- 3307. 93S ::. '10, 10 \=
3. bq S
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
.t '?:r,ryryJsr*.r'
' - 0roLho-as*--:pL'H' -i:-5-a--
tdAn
Tw:
-L S-*s-r.,
6- ATw=
-,*-- a, Lgs-! -(9o t-a.-r"2-s)
l, sg_3_ _
C nJ,,h "na--w,,-/L - L =--ZL
(o, csq v ?s) * ( zo * q. ozE , La\
O,UOq r (Zu ) . O, IZS)
= 11,7o5 = E3, loF lv J8 ,1oe
l , t3?
___t_AJd;ho(\~l__ )n}o-c- ______t Su£(lm (/r CI2f7dCrrCl11.5__---.WJ tb ----E--::: _5Q
----- -~- -- ~________ _ _T~ = (O'b39 )(_35] t- {50 x 0.02.5 )(b8J _
____~3cL+- (50)( o.Q25) __ . _
1'/5. 105I, tl~_~ _
(
lO. (.,3'1 r 95) + (2 0 x. 0.02.5 x tog)O,~'3'f r(z.O)<O,02S)
:.. qq, 7--05
/, /3 ~
83, /0 F ..28·J./°G
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
tl-,o_zoad i%:T:#"-.
tbu: 0.08 - O'2 IS/S
-ro-Wog Jote Tmtr,l[,w2t.Ct
t7-to-809 ln tnFnat0.9'C O 0:30pnt
la-tl-Ntg ldtr fnFrttw
n*, ti.'ff:otjii{cvs/s
o?-to-aoe 1#ffi^n*:
u_,0_no8 iffi:Tw*m-tO-AOA Jorn fsrnr.ata
t5.5'C
"6d+@' , .
n_matlffiyiw*
t1-10-NE Ja{f,r
no* o.#it9 o.,!|'ofcn-, - , r \ ' . : ' I i ! | d i ' i {n l1a i wY
?ri il'' i6 O"il
rn* ' r r- i lF3 f , i4P Alt+-:srn' ; t, .adr. : i !11 l l , t9r l t f m 14t! t -
o7-to-&Og fabr23.C'C
E.T.P' ::
l
ll-*r.on tcmpmrn25.ec - 11.0'-C
?
14-10-2008 rat... r.m,..,....tUff~10.7"C - nrc "-
07-10-2008 r..,.,. rom,..,....tuN/5.5"C
07-10-2009 A>T Tom,..,....tun10 9"C 0 9' SOp'"
14-10-2008 r..,.,. Tom,..,....t .....IS.O"C - 19.0·C
now: 0.07 - 0.115 JiS!S
07-10-2009 r..,.,. Tom-'ZO.O"C ,..._.....
r ..tor rempmstuno25.0"C - 41.0·C
E.T.P.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
LN
InFluerr| Iomg, 'o, r.L , r r \
( + o k - ^ a , t - r f r n t o + 4 t r ' ^ ) .(t
f r 6BBu l
o6[B
T,"o\, fory,?, oC, T- .. i,i:,* ,.
o
z_;
6
--
{(!
C^
41 BI
9
oot,|
(^o
tG
Ftt l
(rloc)
jrl
t,irt
o
rr.')t
r,,.
t//
tl ltt
t t
ttt lr/
1lh
11'\~I\)Ul4- -~p. -c.. J 'i..( rtjc:...<A At- ""~r- t- O.j. . ...ll1-,C-.).
1JI -o ...,o
v;
~~~
j1 "
"\})
tTl~ \II
"0
\ \0
('
/("'J
~p~
)//1/
IIII
." .~
().)o
-o
-o
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
5*--". Vu\uel
35
31.5
3 5
- , ;30 l -
<t-
E,.a)r
^ a. -6'
^ J s
IL
3o
J 't
JF.
)t(
5 - -;I \
(,A J
l$i *' K6 -l-
2 c >
L o
\
C-\f
Ti. = 3soC Cansfqnt
Tu '3o 'c . C ..stt^.r.t
lo r 2ooo
t lo3 o
Vn\,r "5
\o
Vo.\vw.
?~
J ~ 30
i"""...)~
.1. ....~
~ ~If
~ j ~G
~i'----'
T~ -;: ~SOC: C.Ol'\stCo\¥\+
~~
I'---1\. ~ 30·(. c.. .('\s~"'~
~--.......~
I-----~.............
r---------- -------r------r--------- ---
1A:2o~c..
'2.0
\0 "'\0
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
ATTACHMENT I2.4
Station Number Waterbody Location Station Type
Station Catchment
Area [Km2] DWF (m³/s
95 percentile
(m³/s)
Comment on DWF
95%
26013 LUNG BANADA Autographic Recorder 219.268 0.3400 0.5100
26014 LUNG BANADA BRIDGE Logger/Autographic Recorder 215.137 0.3300 0.5000
Information obtained from http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/water/flows/name,12746,en.html
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
ATTACHMENT I2.5
Station No: 0350 Location: Bridge W. of Banada Date From: 2001 To: 2003
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls outside either an upper or lower
threshold and highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Parameter Parameter
Units Minimum Median Maximum
No of
Samples Source
Source
Type
B.O.D mg O21-1 0.9 1.6 2.9 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Colour Hazen 16 112 249 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Ortho-
Phosphate mg P 1-1 0.00 0.01 0.03 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
Oxidised
Nitrogen mg N 1-1 0.2 0.3 0.7 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
pH
7.3 7.8 8.4 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Temperature oC 3.4 9.6 19.3 32 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Total
Ammonia mg N 1-1 0.01 0.03 0.06 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
Station No: 0400 Location: Bridge u/s Lough Gara Date From: 2001 To: 2003
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls outside either an upper or lower
threshold and highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Parameter Parameter
Units Minimum Median Maximum
No of
Samples Source
Source
Type
B.O.D mg O21-1 1.2 1.8 2.8 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Colour Hazen 34 110 264 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Ortho-
Phosphate mg P 1-1 0.01 0.03 0.28 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
Oxidised
Nitrogen mg N 1-1 0.3 0.7 3.0 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
pH
7.1 7.9 8.3 33 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Temperature oC 3.3 10.2 17.5 32 Lough
Ree Derg LA
Total
Ammonia mg N 1-1 0.02 0.05 0.22 35
Lough
Ree Derg LA
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
\
r|t
OrFI I
d9-I I
9dI I
€FIt qfor= {- r lt tsr55rF}=
*x'o='grE*5(c5ooaor$
Iou6',atpoJ.:i(oCIT
oo:too_
LiF0)
fg.-l - c.t
=q1-\ q o^! / @ - r
=d ^g=$o
E8dil
=c)'6
// =
=
:r!
5(Do
t,
x
--->
HO
\Nto
de
al
""ithm
ixin
gzo
ne
sfo
rp
riority
po
lluta
nt
dis
ch
arg
es
?
Tobias
Bleninger,
Gerhard
H.
Jirka
IfH~Institute
forH
ydromechanics
University
Karlsruhe
Germ
any
Un
lverslta
tKa
rlsruh
e
Institu
tfOr
Hyd
rom
ech
an
ik
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
rg,F}orlq,I
3I IxIT
=
19-
g
oo#I Io5+EI I
*trtfiI I
o5
Y
I
-ro= .No=
$_
(f-i; -L Y
a= :
=
I I
lralrl.
i l l f 4NF g.!i a 3;^s f
E8q; HTtsDaod
F5 ilEw=oi' =-='
GI
oo
9m;rH!Yoo8 nrr 3;-gig
o( -
? FqoS='
$"; Ir 5
{ql-N{o,CL
Etrd
> +: 9 o
x cF ( D
P.toC
mt l
xc*
=Q
il1,
N Iml
Ic lx l
-o= .No:l0r_o-6'= .u=.of
VVFTl=dYs#- i I3A=.=A9=.0)Aqd 3=6=E:tg1.8
.trAxi lq
X rrF
=6=t{\-/
x=r
d
{otoo
Jo
xN
l l
-9= ( J tr |+a>o< l lq to6's5ooo(o(D:f,oo'a
trN
t-
ilIIIEl N
lcIR
j
olwl N
Nm
Aoirr
rFl5l-III
l=III
Io lA F 'a - ' (
l . / r Iv,/ |j r l
\
_r)t t
il'
To
bia
sB
len
lng
er
La
tera
lm
ixin
g(A
dv
ec
tion
+D
iffus
ion
)y&
InstitutfOr
Hydrom
echanik
-B
\nv•u',r
J :(':0
:0n
•U
.-.
point-sourcea
lrive
rb
an
k
Ln
w
for
B:»h
/
A
cry...w
asteplum
e
x
1C
ma 7
x~\
•H
orizontalDiffusivity:
Ey
=uyu*h
•H
orizontaldistribution:cry
=~2Ey~•
Horizontalm
ixing(river
bank)L
ate
ral
mixin
gif
cry~
8,
x=
XM
L
~independent
ofvelocity
~m
orphologydom
inates!
Uz
=0,5
+/-
50%m
oderateheterogeneities
82
82U
B2U
~1
0-
XM
L~
2E=
2(0,5u*h)h
010U
t,
Ex.
1:R
heinn
ea
rK
arlsru
he
XM
L~
10
x25
02/3
=208.000m
~2
00
kmslow
!
Ex.
2:sm
all
river
inS
chw
arzw
ald
(Mu
rg)
XM
L~
10
x52/O
,5=
500m=
0,5
km
late
ralm
ixing
isslo
wp
roce
ss!11
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
\
ltlx!l3E
Io-horl
oo3E
Ioto3IIxI !
5€
se g@g, @gl 3i l I l |G l t t< l rg H=. 6-J = . od
- r a- O =- !
l l =
9 r l(rr g,33
qTCN-U69cq-a,'n24.Hqgoo'Ao6d=;Eqg7'= € q..9)HA=-9F;EE=o f =h I == 8(D= '@-tq\/qt
agoo@coa=acn$oG'- -c==s.OJDidf :
oo=@-tco*.ofu
5= .o-(oo,a
Er l loB
=x.3GI
oa
tctFFo
oaqrN+.:Tr-> Ul = OT D Y q I
913t-
3
q q EE'{_ t i* 3 Eq= = i
N
:to
I
3oot
-
To
bia
sB
len
lng
er
Ex
am
ple
for
co
mp
lete
mix
ing
Passive
po
int
sou
rceat
water
surface
and
riverb
ord
er
Un
lversltlt
Ka
rlsruh
e
InstitutfOr
Hyd
rom
ech
an
ik
Exa
mp
leB
/hM
ixing
len
gh
ts
Ve
rtical
Lm
vH
orizo
nta
lL
mh
A)
Big
river
B=
250m
,h=
3m
B)
Sm
all
river
B=
5m
,h=
0,5m
~80
10
210m
35m
t~fa
st
20
80
00
m
50
0m
tve
ryslow
!
•D
ischargedynam
ics:"A
ctivesource"
•H
eterogeneities:river
curvature,constructions
(bridges,
sluices,pow
erplants)
•P
osition:M
iddleo
friver
crosssection
•m
osteffectiv:
Diffuser
12
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
Report on Nutrient Contributionto Surface Water and to Goundwater
from Shannonside MiIk Products Plant withParticular Reference to Lagoon/Wetland Decommissioning
SHANNONSIDE MILK PRODUCTS
mescal &q,ss ociates
CONSULTINC I}IOIilEERS[nlerprise House,
Cenhe Pork Rood, Co*, lrelond.Telephone: 021 -{31 {388
Fon 021-1J11369emoil: mesccl0indigo.ie
August 2008
Report on Nutrient Contributionto Surface Water and to Goundwater
from Shannonside Milk Products Plant withParticular Reference to Lagoon/Wetland Decommissioning
SHANNONSIDE MILK PRODUCTS
mescaL &associates
August 2008
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Enterprise House,Centre Pork Rood, Cork. Ireland.
Telephone: 021-43U388rox: 021-4314369
email: mescalDindigo.ie
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
I
ItI REPORT ON NUTRIENT CONTRIBUTION TO SURFACEI WATER AND TO GROUNDWATER FROM SHANNONSIDE
MILK PRODUCTS PLANT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE
I ro LAGooN / wETLAND DECoMMrssroNING.
I
I summary
I This report was prepared as required by condition 10.4 of the IPPCI Licence.
I The report outlines the rainfall and runoff from the site. It outlines the
: water quality in the site . It outlines the impact of the runoff from the site
t on the River Lung.
The report outlines the likely impact of the site on groundwater.
- The report outlines the current condition of the lagoon and how this will
t
improve with licence compliance.
I The report proposes a logical and transparent methodology for= decommissioning the lagoon.
Iz Overall lYater Regime
I The 16.5 hectares of lagoon / wetlands at Shannonside Co Op receivenatural inflow of water from 2 sources *
t - direct rainfall onto the 16.5 hectares
:
- runoff from 10.7 hectares adjacent lands due north
f The two above add to give a total catchment of 27.2 hectares.
I The lagoon or pond area typically takes up some 4.1 hectares within the| 16.5 hectares above.L
TII:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
---
REPORT ON NUTRIENT CONTRIBUTION TO SURFACEWATER AND TO GROUNDWATER FROM SHANNONSIDEMILK PRODUCTS PLANT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCETO LAGOON I WETLAND DECOMMISSIONING.
Summary
This report was prepared as required by condition lOA of the JPpeLicence.
The report outlines the rainfall and runoff from the site. It outlines thewater quality in the site. It outlines the impact of the runoff from the siteon the Ri ver Lung.
The report outlines the likely impact of the site on groundwater.
The report outl ines the current condition of the lagoon and how this wi 11improve with licence compliance.
The report proposes a logical and transparent methodology fordecommissioning the lagoon.
Overall Water Regime
The 16.5 hectares of lagoon / wetlands at Shannonside Co Op receivenatural inflow of water from 2 sources-
- direct rainfall onto the 16.5 hectares- runoff from 10.7 hectares adjacent lands due north
The two above add to give a total catchment of 27.2 hectares.The lagoon or pond area typically takes up some 4.1 hectares within the16.5 hectares above.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
TIt!I
ItItttIIIItIIttIII
The above is shown on Attachment l
Water loss occurs in the following ways *
- evapotranspiration ( E-T) from vegetation- evaporation from water surfaces / ponds- percolation through the ground- direct outflow via overflow pipe
The water regime is examined for the following periods *
- annual- winter seixon , November to April- sutnmer season . Mav to October
The winter and summer seasons are taken to correspond with similar datain Teagasc work on which most of this hydrology of this report is based.
The flow paths taken by water in the lagoon / wetlands are shown onAttachment 2.
Inflow
The 30 year annual average rainfall at Ballaghaderreen is 1l56mm,comprising 616mm in winter and 543mm in summer. Rainfall figuresfrom the Meteorological Service are shown on Attachment 3.
Annually, about 50Yo of rcinfall runs off the land in Ireland as a whole.This figure is taken as being representative of the lands in question. Theremainder of the rainfall is lost through E-T and percolation to ground.For the lands contributing to runoff, E-T losses are taken as 42Yoannually, and percolation as 87o (Ref. J. Mulqueen, Teagasc).
In order to estimate the variation in runoff with the seasons, it isnecessary to divide the E-T and percolation losses into summer andwinter components. E-T increases in summer, while percolation generallyfalls. The reverse happens in winter. Field studies by Teagasc at a similarlocation in North Connaught have shown that79o/o of total annual E-T
2
•••I
•••••••••••••II
The above is shown on Attachment 1.
Water loss occurs in the following ways -
- evapotranspiration ( E-T) from vegetation- evaporation from water surfaces / ponds- percolation through the ground- direct outflow via overflow pipe
The water regime is examined for the following periods -
- annual- winter season, November to April- summer season, May to October
The winter and summer seasons are taken to correspond with similar datain Teagasc work on which most of this hydrology of this report is based.
The flow paths taken by water in the lagoon / wetlands are shown onAttachment 2.
Inflow
The 30 year annual average rainfall at Ballaghaderreen is 1156mm,comprising 616mm in winter and 543mm in summer. Rainfall figuresfrom the Meteorological Service are shown on Attachment 3.
AnnuaHy, about 50% of rainfall runs off the land in Ireland as a whole.This figure is taken as being representative of the lands in question. Theremainder of the rainfall is lost through E-T and percolation to ground.For the lands contributing to runoff, E-T losses are taken as 42%annually, and percolation as 8% (Ref. J. Mulqueen, Teagasc).
In order to estimate the variation in runoff with the seasons, it isnecessary to di vide the E-T and percolation losses into summer andwinter components. E-T increases in summer, while percolation generallyfalls. The reverse happens in winter. Field studies by Teagasc at a similarlocation in North Connaught have shown that 79% of total annual E-T
2
----------------------
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
occurs between April and October. For percolation it is assumed thatT1yoof the total annual percolation quantity ir lost during the winter months.These figures allow total annual runoif to be divid"i itto seasonalcomp.nents. A summary of inflow is given in Attachment 4.
Outtlow
Water loss occurs from the 16.5 ha. of Irrigation Lands in the ways listedaloye, The Irrigation Lands compri se l2.iha. of vegetation and +.t tra.of shallow ponds. E-T losses occur from the vegetation, whileevaporation occurs from the ponds.
- Evapolronspiration
Following the same methodology as above, it is assumed that 4zyo ofdirect annual rainfall onto the ti.qna. of vegetation is lost to theatmosphere and to plant growth. The figure is split 79:21betweensummer and winter, respectively.
- Evaporation
Class A Pan evaporation figures for the Ballaghaderreen area are shownin Attachment 3. A correction factor of 0.7 isirsuafiy applied to class APan results, to more accurately estimate field conditions^itt Ireland fn"f.L.M. Mccumiskey; "water in [reland"). This gives a total of 440mmevaporation per annum, splitT5:25 between ,,*rn.. and winterrespectively over the 4.1 ha. of ponds at Shannonside.
- Percolation
The lands are underlain by peat, which perrnits some percolation ofsurface water onto the ground. A small portion of this percolationcontributes to groundwater recharge. The quantity involved is considerednegligible because:f ,lr impermeable nature orirre underlying clay. Theremaining percolation flows parallel to the peat/clay interdce,""-.rgirrginto the field drain and the eastern stream. ih" p"ui is l.5m a""p orr"average, from trial the hole data. The peat layer has a boundaryiength atthe drain and stream of 600m approx. The toial cross-sectional area offlow, A , is therefore 900m2. The permeability, k, is estimated at 5.0 x
occurs between April and October. For percolation it is assumed that 700/0of the total annual percolation quantity is lost during the winter months.These figures allow total annual runoff to be divided into seasonalcomponents. A summary of inflow is given in Attachment 4.
Outflow
Water loss occurs from the 16.5 ha. of Irrigation Lands in the ways listedabove. The Irrigation Lands comprise 12.4 ha. of vegetation and 4.1 ha.of shallow ponds. E-T losses occur from the vegetation, whileevaporation occurs from the ponds.
- Evapo-transpiration
Following the same methodology as above, it is assumed that 420/0 ofdirect annual rainfall onto the 12.4 ha. of vegetation is lost to theatmosphere and to plant growth. The figure is split 79:21 betweensummer and winter, respectively.
- Evaporation
Class A Pan evaporation figures for the BaJlaghaderreen area are shownin Attachment 3. A correction factor of 0.7 is usually applied to Class APan results, to more accurately estimate field conditions in Ireland (Ref.L.M. McCumiskey; "Water in Ireland"). This gives a total of 440mmevaporation per armum, split 75 :25 between summer and winterrespectively over the 4.1 ha. of ponds at Shannonside.
- Percolation
The lands are underlain by peat, which permits some percolation ofsurface water onto the ground. A small portion of this percolationcontributes to groundwater recharge. The quantity involved is considerednegligible because of the impermeable nature of the underlying clay. Theremaining percolation flows parallel to the peat/clay interface, emerginginto the field drain and the eastern stream. The peat is 1.5m deep onaverage, from trial the hole data. The peat layer has a boundary length atthe drain and stream of 600m approx. The total cross-sectional area offlow, A , is therefore 900m2
• The permeability, k, is estimated at 5.0 x
3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
tIIIItIIIIIIIItIItIt
10-5 m/s which is a representative value for shallow unconsolidated peat.This is given in Attachment 9.
The average hydraulic gradient, i , is estimated at 0.01, assuming thehydraulic grade line lies at the top of the peat area. This is based on thelie of the land, the water levels on the land, and the wetness conditions.Total flow is therefore
Q : kAi : 14204 m3 / annum approx.
This flow is assumed to be spread evenly throughout the year, due to thesaturated condition of the peat, and the relatively stable hydraulicconditions on the lands. This low percolation flow is consistent with fieldobservations on site throughout the year.
- Direct Discharge
The remainder of the total inflow discharges via the outflow pipe to thefield drain. As shown by the attachments, the irrigation lands are dividedby a bank. Water entering the upper section percolates through the bankand the peaty ground to contribute to surface water in the lower section.A portion also overflows to the lower section through an overflow pipe.Ultimately this water discharges via the overflow pipe to the field drain
A summary of outflow is given in Attachment 4.
The above sections - Overall Water Regime , Inflow and Outflow havebeen taken from the EIS prepared in 1996. The Water Section in this EISis contained in full in Auachment 14.
Quality of the Discharge to the River Lung
Over a considerable number of years , the quality of the discharge fromthe lagoon / wetland to the River Lung has been monitored. The qualityhas shown an improvement over this period , but varies during thesurnmer and winter seasons. The quality during the summer season islower than during the winter season. There is less outflow in summerseason which mitigates the lower quality somewhat. The qualrty variationis principally as result of natural photosynthesis in summer season, withincreased P concentration being carried out. In addition to this , there wasin most years a start up period in the plant wherein the overall effluentquality was variable. This was generally around mid March at the start up
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
III
~-
'.
10-5 mls which is a representative value for shallow unconsolidated peat.This is given in Attachment 9.
The average hydraulic gradient, i l is estimated at 0.01, assuming thehydraulic grade line lies at the top of the peat area. This is based on thelie of the land, the water levels on the land, and the wetness conditions.Total flow is therefore
Q= kAi = 14200 m3/ annum approx.
This flow is assumed to be spread evenly throughout the year, due to thesaturated condition of the peat, and the relatively stable hydraulicconditions on the lands. Th.is low percolation flow is consistent with fieldobservations on site throughout the year.
- Direct Discharge
The remainder of the total inflow discharges via the outflow pipe to thefield drain. As shown by the attachments, the irrigation lands are dividedby a bank. Water entering the upper section percolates through the bankand the peaty ground to contribute to surface water in the lower section.A portion also overflows to the lower section through an overflow pipe.Ultimately this water discharges via the overflow pipe to the field drain
A summary of outflow is given in Attachment 4.
The above sections - Overall Water Regime, Inflow and Outflow havebeen taken from the EIS prepared in 1996. The Water Section in this EISis contained in full in Attachment 14.
Quality ofthe Discharge to the River Lung
Over a considerable number of years , the quality of the discharge fromthe lagoon / wetland to the River Lung has been monitored. The qualityhas shown an improvement over this period, but varies during thesummer and winter seasons. The quality during the summer season islower than during the winter season. There is less outflow in summerseason which mitigates the lower quality somewhat. The quality variationis principally as result of natural photosynthesis in summer season, withincreased P concentration being carried out. In addition to this, there wasin most years a start up period in the plant wherein the overall effluentquality was variable. This was generally around mid March at the start up
4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:10
II|
ttttI
of high volume operations at the plant. It resulted invariably to somediversion of off standard treated effluent to the lagoon area. This wasrecorded in the plant records.
The new IPPC license will require focus on the start up of high volumeoperations to eliminate its impact on effluent quality completely.Coupled with this there were very infrequent off specification dischargeswhich were automatically diverted to the lagoon area. These were alsorecorded in the plant records. The new IPPC license requires offstandardtreated effluent to be eliminated completely.
The quality of the discharge to the River Lung over the last 5 years hasbeen checked monthly. The nutrient content plus the COD weremeasured. The sampling was done on an approximate monthly basis andthe analyses were carried out by Euro Environmental Services , CoLouth. This is given in Attachment 5.
To quantifu this an estimate is carried out for the summer and winterseasons over the last 5 years. This estimate uses the averageconcentrations analysed for those seasons multiplied by the average dailyflow for the specific half year period. This is shown graphically inAttachment 6.
It is clear from the above that the quality of discharge to the River Lunghas improved progressively over the last 5 years. This will continue toimprove with the further reduction and elimination of discharges fromShannonside.
River Lung Quahty
The River Lung qualrty over the last roughly 10 years is shown onAttachmentT and the trends are graphed in Attachment 8. Thisinformation is from EPA data.
The overall quality of the river has improved considerably over the last10 years. It is currently Q index 4 whereas it was Q index 2 some 8 yearsago. This can be attributed to a number of positive changes that havetaken place with regard to the discharges-
IIIIIItIIIIIttI
IIIIII
III
II
II
I
II
IIIIIIIIIIIII...
of high volume operations at the plant. It resulted invariably to somediversion of off standard treated effluent to the lagoon area. This wasrecorded in the plant records.
The new IPPC license will require focus on the start up of high volumeoperations to eliminate its impact on effluent quality completely.Coupled with this there were very infrequent off specification dischargeswhich were automatically diverted to the lagoon area. These were alsorecorded in the plant records. The new IPPC license requires off standardtreated effluent to be eliminated completely.
The quality of the discharge to the River Lung over the last 5 years hasbeen checked monthly. The nutrient content plus the COD weremeasured. The sampling was done on an approximate monthly basis andthe analyses were carried out by Euro Environmental Services, CoLouth. This is given in Attachment 5.
To quantify this an estimate is carried out for the summer and winterseasons over the last 5 years. This estimate uses the averageconcentrations analysed for those seasons multiplied by the average dailyflow for the specific half year period. This is shown graphically inAttachment 6.
It is clear from the above that the quality of discharge to the River Lunghas improved progressively over the last 5 years. This will continue toimprove with the further reduction and elimination of discharges fromShannonside.
River Lung Quality
The River Lung quality over the last roughly 10 years is shown onAttachment 7 and the trends are graphed in Attachment 8. Thisinformation is from EPA data.
The overall quality of the river has improved considerably over the last10 years. It is currently Q index 4 whereas it was Q index 2 some 8 yearsago. This can be attributed to a nwnber of positive changes that havetaken place with regard to the discharges-
5
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
IIItIIIIIIIIttIItttT
- Town of Ballaghdereeen has installed a secondary treatment plant- Shannonside Milk Products have improved their effluent quality- Meat processing factory has stopped processing- Agriculture has limited fertilizer application to land
The River Lung quality downstream of Ballaghaderreen (station 0350)is still slightly less than that upstream ( station 0400).See Attachment 7.The most recent biological assessment showed a Q rating of 4downstream and 4-5 upstream. The current N and P figures are consistentwith those of the River Lung generally at the present. This is apparentfrom results at the upstream station at Figh Bridge ( 0100). The N and Pwill be fuither improved from Shannonside with year around compliancewith the IPPC standards for discharge. This will reflect in the the RiverLung quality and may even bring it to Q index 4-5 atdownstream station0350.
Quality of the Discharge to Groundwater
It is difficult to be exact on the precise quantity of water from thelagoon/wetland areathat ends up as groundwater. John Mulqueen ,Teagasc, in his work already referenced on this , gave an indicative figureof 8Yo of total from lands contributing to runoff.
Trial holes were dug throughout the land and these are shown onAttachment 9. They all showed a dense saturated grey clay at between 1.5and2 m from surface. This dense saturated grey clay is referred to locallyas 'daub'. This clay is highly impervious. This is overlain by dark brownpeat with thin layer of topsoil over.
The land in this area in the National Land Survey is as described inAttachment 10. In summary this is described as follows:
Association 3 e - 8[#li; ;ffI,?ffi :?ii##:n ffi o,itio,,poorly drained.
6h
II
IIIII
IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIII
-
- Town of Ballaghdereeen has installed a secondary treatment plant- Shannonside Milk Products have improved their effluent quality- Meat processing factory has stopped processing- Agriculture has limited fertilizer application to land
The River Lung quality downstream of Ballaghaderreen (station 0350)is still slightly less than that upstream ( station 0400).See Attachment 7.The most recent biological assessment showed a Q rating of 4downstream and 4-5 upstream. The current N and P figures are consistentwith those of the River Lung generally at the present. This is apparentfrom results at the upstream station at Figh Bridge ( 0100). The Nand Pwill be further improved from Sharmonside with year around compliancewith the IPPC standards for discharge. This will reflect in the the RiverLung quality and may even bring it to Q index 4-5 at downstream station0350.
Quality ofthe Discharge to Groundwater
It is difficult to be exact on the precise quantity of water from thelagoon/wetland area that ends up as groundwater. John Mulqueen,Teagasc, in his work already referenced on this, gave an indicative figureof 8% of total from lands contributing to runoff.
Trial holes were dug throughout the land and these are shown onAttachment 9. They all showed a dense saturated grey clay at between 1.5and 2 m from surface. This dense saturated grey clay is referred to locallyas 'daub'. This clay is highly impervious. This is overlain by dark brownpeat with th inlayer of topsoi lover.
The land in this area in the National Land Survey is as described inAttachment 10. In summary this is described as follows:
Association 39 - Gleys 90% , Grey Brown Podzolodics 10%.- Glacial till predominantly of limestone composition.- poorly drained.
6
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
IIIIttItItttIIIllllII
There is no borehole information for the area available from GSI. Localenquiries from well drillers at locations close to the town ofBallaghadeffeen have wells at between 50 and 200 ft deep. There are noreports of contamination to wells resulting from the lagoon/ wetland area.There was no investigative well sunk in the area for the purpose of thisreport. The indications are clear from the soil type , the presense of the'daub' and from the absence of any reported problems that a well was notrequired. A further difficulty was recognised in that it would be difficultbecause of access to drill a well at the lagoons.
In hydrogeological terms the lagoon/wetland is located on an area of lowvulnerability over a locally important aquifer. See Attachment 11 onAquifer and Attachment 12 on Vulnerability. The low vulnerability to theaquifer classification is due to depth and to coverage type. That therehave been no incidents or repofts of well water contamination resultingfrom the lagoon / wetland is consistent with this low vulnerabilityclassification.
Physical Condition of the Lagoon
The lagoon was constructed in 1995. It is a sound structure. The lagoonwhen originally constructed in 1995 is photographed . The same viewtoday is also photographed showing how the area has matured. Thesephotographs are shown on Attachment 13.
A report on the stability of the lagoon was prepared in 1996. This reportis attached together with some photographs of its original construction.See Attachment 15. The lagoon embankments have been structurallyexamined for stabilify many times since their construction. They havebeen sound.
The lagoon embankments were granted planning permission by the CoCouncil when the factory was constructed in the 1970's. See Attachment16.
)
II
III
IIIIIII
II
II
II,.-
There is no borehole infonnation for the area available from GSI. Localenquiries from well drillers at locations close to the town ofBallaghaderreen have wells at between 50 and 200 ft deep. There are noreports of contamination to wells resulting from the lagoon! wetland area.There was no investigative well sunk in the area for the purpose of thisreport. The indications are clear from the soil type, the presense of the'daub' and from the absence of any reported problems that a well was notrequired. A further difficulty was recognised in that it would be difficultbecause of access to drill a well at the lagoons.
In hydrogeological terms the lagoon/wetland is located on an area of lowvulnerability over a locally important aquifer. See Attachment lIonAquifer and Attachment 12 on Vulnerability. The low vulnerability to theaquifer classification is due to depth and to coverage type. That therehave been no incidents or reports of well water contamination resultingfrom the lagoon / wetland is consistent with this low vulnerabilityclassification.
Physical Condition ofthe Lagoon
The lagoon was constructed in 1995. It is a sound structure. The lagoonwhen originally constructed in 1995 is photographed. The same viewtoday is also photographed showing how the area has matured. Thesephotographs are shown on Attachment 13.
A report on the stability of the lagoon was prepared in 1996. This reportis attached together with some photographs of its original construction.See Attachment 15. The lagoon embankments have been structurallyexamined for stability many times since their construction. They havebeen sound.
The lagoon embankments were granted planning permission by the CoCouncil when the factory was constructed in the 1970's. See Attachment16.
7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
III
Proposed Decommissioning of the Lagoon
The lagoon is currently part of a wetland with much wildlife and birdactivity. Care should be taken to ensure that any decommissioningactivities do not impact this unnecessarily.
The steps required by the IPPC licence will have the effect of notintroducing any additional nutrient or organic matter from the factory tothe lagoon. This will relieve the lagoon of the diversion off standardtreated effluent at the start of the dairy season in mid March. It will alsoeliminate occasional diversion that upset final quality due to shock loadto the treatment plant.
The impact of the discontinuation of the automatic diversion of offstandard treated eflluent will over a relatively short period of time resultin a cleaner discharge to the River Lung. This is particularily the case forsoluble content as it essentially a flushing operation. We would notexpect this period to take more than one year in view of the large volumeof water. This is based on the following figures.
IIII
Storage of 4.1 hectares x I m deep avDischarge annually from lagoonTreated effluent diverted last year ( est 10 days)
: 41,000 m3= 160,613 m3: 15,000 m3
Consequent on the above which is short term , the long term contributionwould be largely attributed to that associated with the settled matter onthe floor of the lagoon. It is not feasible to reliably identiSr itscontribution at this point. It will be more identifiable after the flushingoperation is completed.
Primarily what would be looked at then would be the nutrient content.
The phosphorous content should not be significant on account of it beinglargely soluble which should see it being carried out early.
The nitrogenous content tends to go in and out of solubility more readilywhich leads to it persisting in the outflow over time. Also thenitrogenous content is subject to naturally occurring oxididation andanoxic activity. The anoxic activity causes conversion to nitrogen gaswhich goes to the atmosphere. It is not possible to give u""rrrui"predictions on to what degree , where to and when the nitrogen will havevacated the settled muds. Soils or settled muds everywhere naturallycontain an amount of nitrogen. What is certain however is that the
(,J
8
Primarily what would be looked at then would be the nutrient content.
Proposed Decommissioning ofthe Lagoon
- 41,000 m3= 160,613 m3- 15,000 m3
The phosphorous content should not be signi ficant on account of it beinglargely soluble which should see it being carried out early.
Consequent on the above which is short term, the long term contributionwould be largely attributed to that associated with the settled matter onthe floor of the lagoon. It is not feasible to reliably identify itscontribution at this point. It will be more identifiable after the flushingoperation is completed.
The steps required by the IPPC licence will have the effect of notintroducing any additional nutrient or organic matter from the factory tothe lagoon. This will relieve the lagoon of the diversion off standardtreated effluent at the start of the dairy season in mid March. [t will alsoeliminate occasional diversion that upset final quality due to shock loadto the treatment plant.
The lagoon is currently part of a wetland with much wildlife and birdactivity. Care should be taken to ensure that any decommissioningactivities do not impact this unnecessarily.
The nitrogenous content tends to go in and out of solubility more readilywhich leads to it persisting in the outflow over time. Also thenitrogenous content is subject to naturally occurring oxididation andanoxic activity. The anoxic activity causes conversion to nitrogen gaswhich goes to the atmosphere. It is not possible to give accuratepredictions on to what degree, where to and when the nitrogen will havevacated the settled muds. Soils or settled muds everywhere naturallycontain an amount of nitrogen. What is certain however is that the
The impact of the discontinuation of the automatic diversion of offstandard treated effluent will over a relatively short period of time resultin a cleaner discharge to the River Lung. This is particularily the case forsoluble content as it essentially a flushing operation. We would notexpect this period to take more than one year in view of the large volumeof water. This is based on the following figures.
Storage of 4.1 hectares x 1 m deep avDischarge annually from lagoonTreated effluent diverted last year ( est 10 days)
I
III
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
IIII
III
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
tItrIIItttIIItIIIIII
concentrations of nitrogen in the discharge to the River Lung willdecrease somewhat from its present level.
There is no definite benefit to be got from planting reeds or similar on thefloor. This may increase the rate of nutrient uptake but would add thetending and harvesting to be done. It is likely that much of the settledmud that the nutrient is in is under water. This does not lend itself to easeof planting reeds. To dewater would likely upset the natural wetlandsystem that is there.
The BOD will break dor,vn completely in a relatively short period of timewith the microbiological activity in the lagoon. It should approach naturalrunoff background levels within the first year.
Closure
It is sensible not to upset the natural wetland that is there. The nutrientcontent of the wetland can be monitored to the point wherein thedischarge no longer exceeds the natural background of the River Lung.
Removal of the treated effluent infeed to the lagoon will speed up mattersconsiderably. In light of this a period of monitoring by Shannonside withreporting to EPA should be set up.
An initial period of 3 ypprs of above should be carried out with oncemonthly analyses of lNnd orthophosphate. Should the results of sameindicate extending that period then same would be undertaken byShannonside until the area is deemed decommissioned bv EPA.
$Jr_*A--$^wu(/Michael MescalChartered Engineer
August 2008
•I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
III
I
concentrations of nitrogen in the discharge to the River Lung willdecrease somewhat from its present level.
There is no definite benefit to be got from planting reeds or similar on thefloor. This may increase the rate of nutrient uptake but would add thetending and harvesting to be done. 1t is likely that much of the settledmud that the nutrient is in is under water. This does not lend itself to easeof planting reeds. To dewater would likely upset the natural wetlandsystem that is there.
The BOD will break down completely in a relatively short period of timewith the microbiological activity in the lagoon. It should approach naturalrunoff background levels within the first year.
Closure
It is sensible not to upset the natural wetland that is there. The nutrientcontent of the wetland can be monitored to the point wherein thedischarge no longer exceeds the natural background of the River Lung.
Removal of the treated effluent infeed to the lagoon will speed up mattersconsiderably. In light of this a period of monitoring by Shannonside withreporting to EPA should be set up.
An initial period of3 y~~rs of above should be carried out with oncemonthly analyses of .,~nd orthophosphate. Should the results of sameindicate extending that period then same would be undertaken byShannonside until the area is deemed decommissioned by EPA.
Michael MescalChartered Engineer
August 2008
9
i _
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
l
Attachments:
I - Water Regime Lands2 - Water Regime Flowpaths3 - Rainfall and Evaporation Figures4 - Inflow and Outflow5 - Pond Quality6 - Pond Quahty Trends7 - EPA River Data8 - River Data Trends9 - Trial Holesl0 - Soil Type1l - Aquifer12 - Vulnerabilty13 - Lagoon AlVetland Photographs14 - EIS 1996 - Water Section15 - Report on Stability16 - Planning Permission
l0
IIII
III
I
I
I
II
I
A ttacb ments:
1 - Water Regime Lands2 - Water Regime Flowpaths3 - Rainfall and Evaporation Figures4 - Inflow and Outflow5 - Pond Quality6 - Pond Quality Trends7 - EPA River Data8 - River Data Trends9 - Trial Holes10 - Soil Type11 - Aquifer12 - Vulnerabilty13 - Lagoon fWetland Photographs14 - EIS 1996 - Water Section15 - Report on Stability16 - Planning Pennission
10
-"
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
=oJu_cI=
tI
o)P z-/o rF O
:<z.
@
II
p \ ^ d
t ( ',-zW"
t
vo z.
E.
\
tr*1=!.-\ \{Eo
\.:___\
c
\n
U.-t
' r/ -
a-f o ;
r-*l
:*
a_F-tu
:,
it\i
\
I
D-taj \
CLFa
\........*Qnt /
^ v /\ \ < / ] Q'
Attachment
atLJLLJ
qJ
!
Tl - )
=.]! '
>, )(
,/.
\Vi \
Tl'~
Rf{
FG
I!\-1
[I..
\;\I
).S1/
5000
OV
ERFL
OW
TOFI
ELD
DR
AIN \
---
-",-----
--~,--
"
).-,
,-'
'-..
.......
.....:::-
-
"-","
\(
"xv
~'~v
y.,
'.~<
~,
'''.1
~'X'X\
<>
eAU
AGH
AOER
REEN
\\\-'
N~'{
~~W>
~~OO
~_~~\
~,~~,
::C~
1\~~~
~'\
-"
~~
><"<»~~
~-
'\\~
"\\.d~~
_~
~\___
_~~~
~-/s~
-~_:?,
P-/
i/
-~
/--/
---
II
;
/~
//}
'-""
I'"
/
~"'-';/
"'V
I
><
~O~
",,
/1//
//'
'/
/i
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 2
vv
(,zlJ
tr
trK,>)
uJ(L
E39ILtrIU
ozccu
oJIUtr
zotrt l : z
RSUl
3\arF(L
3oLLuJ=(ttutrtrtuF
=
(LazccFr
o(L
7oY J
, ul ( ,o lo(,E U Jw z
zIF
IootIU(L
zorrdazF OT Z;?d
IU
z
\ d= \>v ' ^
c r i l[ ta u l7
trF
I
o(L
uJz
ttttI
JJ
ILztr
\
JJ
ILz(f
\
JJ
lLz(.f
\
IIIII,6
I•Q
1~
__
.~
---
--..
--.--
.- -
--/R
AIN
FA
LL
jEV
AP
O-
TR
AN
SP
IRA
ION
I r
[ jPE
RC
OL
AT
ION
PE
RC
OL
AT
ION
(NE
GL
IGIB
LE
)
/RA
INF
AL
L
EV
AP
O-
TR
AN
SP
IRA
ION
EV
AP
OR
AT
ION
II
I/'
BA
NK
rO
VE
RF
LO
WP
IPEr=
\P
ON
DIT
.-(I
l~
/RA
INF
AL
L
;E
VA
PO
-T
RA
NS
PIR
AIO
N
FIE
LD
DR
AIN
OV
ER
FL
OW
PIP
E
I
IRR
IGA
TIO
NL
AN
DS
WA
TE
RR
EG
IME
FL
OW
PA
TH
S
~-
~ ;:l:~ ('"
J ;:r 3 rtl
::J .- IV
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 3
a
r r t
r -
t"ttItttI
zll
9 1 t t- . - \ =f - l ; ' ] >
i <'daz:A r.--t {- b ( I \
<rnYr-l r-'l v- - J
^cov <x= = :\
" t v : .:<=- \ -
r _ - H
- H =
4zoc=2
- _ l l
l lIlott <Irui>-I
CrrrO fis
ttt ll i r l o
; | l !i O
- j - - - { - , f ;
t t t - t i; I i l > r. , - ,. , v
. r l l| | ,,i-L I
(')(\l
l
c!
It
i
II
II
l ,i"rrl' / l lu loc | |' io l ! '
+-+,: 16t:l I
t 3 l
l l-: -t lt t l
l ! ' l r, otO
. l; i r i
C\I
, r l i II t8l3
l- t- i -i i
" 2l ' ' a
=. - )
i i i l
t : lt t t
c") r li* i l I t I '1
I
i: ll l
, lI r| <,>
l l
i I i isi-r i?: : I ls'=' l?
J . E . . I I r t s - , € l It ! r o | l i | ' ' l O , n l a o l
= l ( ! l I l a l g | l 9 .: : = l I l t t l S l s( ! G l l i i l l r r l G l
, c r ; t o l , i I l u l : = J ; t -
' iri-, ,lALr-l-:+Er t 1 tf;1*! Hl r ,fii*r l;' : I I | | 'F' , | | EITf.Al.[lIg
r ( i N r i f ! ' , I l < : ) t ! o
I i | '-' '-l
iit i l_,-l ! ':
ffirEtI;i-,ErEl-t ' I rEiFl',
I i ! l: lEl i , ; l; l l ;F it ! , d i I l O . l | l 6 l
•••
...,
..~,..~~
"'1
----"'
.---
--l--
.--
...--4
__
...
_
-~~~
-'B,~~~-
-..
--
----
1--
bEe"
"-Y
EA
R"
-_
._..
._.._
--
862
9
-c---
----
t---
-.-
__-~
NO
V13
.,-\-
.-.-.
I."
-'-"
1--
-._
--~
.--
--l-
-
---r-'
_..-
~-t--
.-
OC
T34
1,
-. f-,'
-~t
-,-A~Gf~~6~:~~r±i
~f---l
t-----.
-1
--
--"U
G'l
'si:
P8~
1-'
58
-
-I--
--.,
----,.
67 JU
L
10
0
-
--
I._
---1
---
-
:::::~
~;~i!,
:~J~f
_?IM~R~lA
:t4M
8~Yp
J~(J
-JUL
_,.-J-
.I\vera
ge
sb
ase
don
p~riod(
1961~0
1___
.__.-
--..
---_
I_
r=_
I_
__
_,_
.-
__
,..
_
--.,--'.
-J'
-[--'
--1
--.-
Ev;\por~lion
(mm
)
~~~:
:h~:
~nil
Ji:_
F~OB~
_-~
~R_._.
A: 3R1-
"o~y+J,~~
JIA
vera
ge
sb
ase
don
periO
d(1
961\
-19
80
)
RA
INF
AL
LA
ND
EV
AP
OR
AT
ION
FIG
UR
ES
IN13
AL
LA
GI·
IAD
ER
EE
NA
RE
A(S
OU
RC
E:
1\-1ETEOI~OLOGIC/\L
SEI~VICI~)
» ;:::+ Ql
n ;:r 3 t'l> ~ .... w
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
ItttIIIIItI
II
It,l^I
lhII
Attachment 4
Annual
Nov - Apr
May - Oct
Rainfallto I6 .5 ha
m'
19123-s
101640
89595
Runofffrom 10.7 ha
m'
62006
47768
14238
TotalInflow
m'
253241
149408
l 03 833
Direct DischarseTo Stream
m
INFLO\4/ TO IRRIGATION LANDS
INFLO\\'
TotalInflou'
nt'
\\,ATER
Evapo- Er.'aporationTranspiration
:m n t
LOSSES
Percolation
nl'
Annual
Nor ' - Ap r
It4ar,- Oct
r 8040
447 4
1 i566
I 4200
7 t00
7r00
OUTFLO\\/ F'RO]\{ IRRIGATION LANDS
Attachment 4
INFLO\V TO IRRIGATION LANDS
35761
124851
16061 :;:
Direcl DischargeTo Stream
m
Rainfall Runoff Total 1;
to 16.5 ha from10.7ha Inflow[t
m m'- m--I"
191235 62006 253241 \ :/""101640 47768 149408II
89595 14238 103833)
\VATER LOSSES
Evapo- EYaporalion PercolalionTransp.iralion
m·- nl m
TotalInflo'w
I~FLO\V
.-\nllual 25.324 ) 60388 ISO~O )4200
I No,· . Apr 149408 12983 4474 7100
Ma~: - Oct 10~S33 4740:' 13:'66 7100
I
I
I
I
I
I Annual
INov - Apr
May - Oct
I
I
I
OUTFLO\\' FROJ\1 IRRIGATION LANDS
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
IItIttIII
Attachment 5
Pond QuafityDate BOD Phosphate {Orthol Ammonia
28/A5/08 8.0 2 .1 0.8L6/Os/a8 < 2.0 2.6 0.6t6/04/08 2.0 1.5 0.308/a4/08 <2 .O 1.1 o.227/o3/08 2.0 1.0 o.2L6/Lt/07 5.0 1 .1 0.725ho/07 < 2.0 0.8 L.920/tO/07 < 2.0 1.2 1 .104/!0/07 < 2.0 L.3 0.8a6/oe/a7 33.0 3.9 < 0.0916/08/07 9.0 6.0 0.1ts/08/07 6.0 6 .1 0.3L8/07/O7 8.0 1.9 < 0.0906/07/07 < 2.0 1.6 0.32ela6/07 9.0 1 .L < 0.0922/06/07 8.0 1.6 0.6oe/06/07 15.0 0.8 < 0.0906/06/07 22.0 1.6 0.3L7/Os/07 L3.0 L.5 L .17t/os/a7 18.0 o.7 L.727/04107 15.0 o.4 1.520/04/07 L0.0 0.5 0.82e/03/07 2.A 0.7 0.312/8/a7 < 1.5 0.6 0.327/02/07 < 1.5 o.2 < 0.092e/n/a6 2.4 0.7 0.227/LO/O6 6.0 1..9 < 0.091.2/70/06 24.0 1.3 0.92slo9/06 < 1 ,5 0.8 L.3
I.
llltll
l
I.
I.
I
II
I
I
r
I
Attachment 5
Pond Quality
Date BOD Phosphate (Ortho) Ammonia
28/05/08 8.0 2.1 0.8
16}05/08 < 2.0 2.6 0.6
16/04/08 2.0 1.5 0.3
08/04/08 < 2.0 1.1 0.2
27/03/08 2.0 1.0 0.2
16/11/07 5.0 1.1 0.7
25/10/07 < 2.0 0.8 1.9
20/10/07 < 2.0 1.2 1.1
04/10/07 < 2.0 1.3 0.8
06/09/07 33.0 3.9 < 0.09
16/08/07 9.0 6.0 0.1
15/08/07 6.0 6.1 0.3
18/07/07 8.0 1.9 < 0.09
06/07/07 < 2.0 1.6 0.3
29/06/07 9.0 1.1 < 0.09
22/06/07 8.0 1.6 0.6
09/06/07 15.0 0.8 <0.09
06/06/07 22.0 1.6 0.3
17/05/07 13.0 1.5 1.1
11/05/07 18.0 0.7 1.7
27/04/07 15.0 0.4 1.5
20/04/07 10.0 0.5 0.8
29/03/07 2.0 0.7 0.3
12/03/07 < 1.5 0.6 0.3
27/02/07 < 1.5 0.2 < 0.09
29/11/06 2.0 0.7 0.2
27/10/06 6.0 1.9 < 0.09
12/10/06 24.0 1.3 0.9
29/09/06 < 1.5 0.8 1.3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
I;I
tI
IIIII
Attachment 5
Date BOD Phgsphate (Orthol Ammonia
21,/06/A6 23.0 L .1 < 0.02
L2lOsl06 4.0 4,7 0.5
t3/04/06 5.0 0.7 0.1
r8/03/06 3.0 0.5 o.2a4/02/a6 2.0 0.9 r.4L3/01,/06 5.0 0.9 1.5
os/12/os 3.0 1..4 1..2
L8/]Jlas 3.0 t .7 0.8
2t/10/05 2t.0 1..9 0.9
04/LOlOs 18.0 2.4 3.3
02/oelos 32.O 3.1 < 0.02
2e/06/05 34.0 3.5 < 0.02
17/06/0s 45.0 3_2 3.4
3uos/os 13.0 2.9 < 0.02
2s/a5/as 27.0 2 .L < 0.02
te/o5/05 26.A < 0.o2
2el04/a5 5.0 2.2 0.1
aLl04/os 4.O 1.3 < 0.02
L6lozlos 2.0 1.4 1.5
0t/02/05 2.A 1 .1
27101/os 3.0 1.5 L.Z
L3/10/04 6.0 3.6 4.8
a7las/04 26.0 3.9 3.1
t3/08/04 32.0 3.2 0.2
n/a6/04 59.0 3.3
t5l05l04 25.0 L.0 < 0.2
20l04/O4 <2 .O 1 .1 <0 .2
04/03/04 2.O L.L 2.3
LLl02/04 2.0 1.7 0.3
28/01/04 3.0 1.5 1.3
I
Attachment 5
Date BOD Phosphate (Ortho) Ammonia
21/06/06 23.0 1.1 < 0.02
12/05/06 4.0 0.7 0.5
13/04/06 6.0 0.7 0.1
18/03/06 3.0 0.5 0.2
04/02/06 2.0 0.9 1.4
13/01/06 5.0 0.9 1.5
09/12/05 3.0 1.4 1.2
18/11/05 3.0 1.7 0.8
21/10/05 21.0 1.9 0.9
04/10/05 18.0 2.4 3.3
02/09/05 32.0 3.1 < 0.02
29/06/05 34.0 3.5 < 0.02
17/06/05 45.0 3.2 3.4
31/05/05 13.0 2.9 < 0.02
25/05/05 27.0 2.1 < 0.02
19/05/05 26.0 ----- < 0.02
29/04/05 5.0 2.2 0.1
01/04/05 4.0 1.3 < 0.02
16/02/05 2.0 1.4 1.5
01/02/05 2.0 1.1 -----
27/01/05 3.0 1.5 1.2
13/10/04 6.0 3.6 4.8
07/09/04 26.0 3.9 3.1
13/08/04 32.0 3.2 0.2
11/06/04 59.0 3.3 -----
15/05/04 25.0 1.0 < 0.2
20/04/04 < 2.0 1.1 < 0.2
04/03/04 2.0 1.1 2.3
11/02/04 2.0 1.7 0.3
28/01/04 3.0 1.6 1.3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 6
Pond Quality Trends
B.O.D.
Nov- May - Nov - May - Nov - May- Nov- May - Nov-April Oct April Oct April Oct April Oct April
* { . r t s *
I BODavg/kg/day
* LimitedAnalysis
2004I
I
Phosphates (Ortho)1 1 . .
0.6 i-
0.s i*0.4 i'"0 .3 - r -
r Phosphatesavglkglday
|l Ammoniaavglkg/day
* LimitedAnalysis
0.2 J--0 .10.0 . !
Nov - May - Nov - May - Nov - May - Nov - May - Nov -April Oct April Oct April Oct April Oct April
:ltltlrrrri Nov- May- Nov- May- Nov- May- Nov- May- Nov-
I April Oct April Oct April Oct April Oct April
i "***i zoo+ 2oos 2006 2oo7 2oo8L***_"_""_-Ij
i Total Ammonia
2007 2008
I
IAttachment 6
Pond Quality Trends
B.O.D.
.BODavgJkgJday
7
6
54 3
21
oI
I
I
I
INovApril
May - Nov-
Oct April
'"
May
Oct
*
Nov- May-April Oct
*
Nov- May-April Oct
NovApril • Limited
Analysis
I2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
• Phosphatesavg/kgjday
Total Ammonia
Phosphates (Ortho)
•Nov - May - Nov- May- Nov- May- Nov-April Oct April Oct April Oct April * Limited
.. '" *Analysis
2005 2006 2007 2008
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
L~;~i~ ~a~-
2004
I
I
I
II
I
.. Limited
Analysis
• AmmoniaavgjkgJday
NovApril
20082007
------
..May - Nov - May -Oct April Oct
2006
May - Nov-Oct April..
2005
May- Nov-Oct April
'*2004
..Nov April
0.80.70.60.50.4
0.30.2 ,
0.1
0.0
I
I
I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
EPA River Data
\ F t o a t B r i d g e
B a l l a g h a d e r r e e n e
Tr ibu tary S t ream
r* - -Frgh Br rdge
Stat ion No: 0100 Locat ion: F igh Br idge
A value d isp layed in BOLD ind icates the va lue fa l ls outs ide e i ther an upper or lowerthreshold or h igh l ights s tat ions where there may be water qual i ty problems.
Chemical Data '1995 - 1997
Attachment 7
Uni ts M in imum M e d i a n Maximum No o f Samples
P P M 0.7 1 .5 2.7 26e5 P P M 0.01 0.02 0.38 2Bn P P M 0.0 0.5 4.9 23
P P M 0.08 o.t4 0.21 24
ParametersB .O .D
!4[e-t!sp-!6Oxidised Nl i t roge
To ta lAmmon ia
Chemical Data 1998 - 2000
Station No: 0350 Location: Bridge W. Of Banada
A value d isp layed in BOLD ind icates the va lue fa l ls outs ide e i ther an upper or lowerthreshold or h igh l ights s tat ions where there may be water qual i ty problems.
Chemical Data 1995 - t997
I
Parameters Uni ts M in imum Median Maximum No o f Samples
B .O.D P P M L.2 2 .2 2.4 3Ortho-Phosphates P P M 0.02 0.02 0.03 3Oxid ised Ni t rogen P P M 1.0 7.4 1 .8 1
To ta lAmmon ia P P M
Biological QualiW2002 1999 1996 1992 1987 1984 1982 1980 L9784-5 4 4 4-5 4-5 5 5 5 4-5
Parameters Uni ts M in imum Median Maximum No of SamplesB .O.D P P M 0.3 L.2 2.3 3BO r th o-Phosph ates P P M 0.01 0.02 2.69 4 I
Oxid ised Ni t rogen P P M 0.0 o.7 4.9 33To ta lAmmon ia P P M 0.09 o .L4 0 .19 5 l _
I
I
I
III
IIII
II
IIIIIIIII
EPA River Data
lribulary Stteam
Station No: 0100 Location: Figh Bridge
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls ou tside either an upper or lowerthreshold or highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Chemical Data 1995 - 1997~
IParameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
8.0.0 PPM 0.7 1.5 2.7 26- .
Ortho- Phosp~ates PPM 0.01 0.02 0.38 28
Oxidised Ni~rog_en _ PPM 0.0 0.5 4.9 23Total Ammonia PPM 0.08 0.14 0.21 24
--
Chemical Data 1998 - 2000
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
8.0.0 PPM 1.2 2.2 2.4 3Ort hooP hosphates PPM 0.02 0.02 0.03 3
Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 1.0 1.4 1.8 2Total Ammonia PPM
Biological Quality
2002 1999 1996 1992 1987 1984 1982 1980 1978
4-5 4 4 4-5 4-5 5 5 5 4-5
Station No: 0350 Location: Bridge W. Of Banada
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls outside either an upper or lowerthreshold or highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Chemical Data 1995 - 1997
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.O PPM 0.3 1,2 2.3 38Ortho-Phosph ates PPM 0.01 0.02 2.69 41Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.0 0.7 4.9 33Total Ammonia PPM 0.09 0.14 0.19 31
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 7
Chemical Data 1998 - 2000
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of SamplesB.O.D PPM 0.3 t.2 2.4 29Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.00 0.01 0.04 30Oxidised Nitrosen PPM o.2 0.4 0.9 30TotalAmmonia PPM 0.01 0.02 0.05 30
Chemical Data 2fi)1- 2003
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of SamplesB.O.D PPM 0.9 1.6 2.9 33Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.00 0.01 0.03 33Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.2 0.2 o.7 35TotalAmmonia PPM 0.01 0.03 0.06 35Biological Quality
1999 1996 1994 1992 t987 1984 1982 1980 19784-5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4-5 4
Station No:0400 Location: Bridge uls Lough Gara
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls outside either an upper or lowerthreshold or highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Chemical Data 1995 - L997
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of SamplesB.O.D PPM 0.5 1.5 5.3 39Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.09 4.93 42Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.1 1.1 5.1 35TotalAmmonia PPM 0.14 0.14 0.60 31
Chemical Data 1998 - 2(X}0Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of SamplesB.O.D PPM 1.0 1.8 2.5 29Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.04 0.43 30Oxidised Nitrogen PPM o.2 0.6 1.0 30TotalAmmonia PPM 0.03 0.06 o.t7 30
II
IL
II
l
Chemical Data 2fi)1- 2OO3
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maxirnum No of SamplesB.O.D PPM L.2 1.8 2.8 33Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.03 0.28 35Oxidised Nitrosen PPM 0.3 o.7 3.0 35TotalAmmonia PPM 0.02 0.05 0.22 35
Biological Quality2002 1999 1996 1994 1992 1987 1984 1982 1980 1982 1980 19784 3 2-3 2 3-4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
I
I
Attachment 7
Chemical Data 1998 - 2000
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.D PPM 0.3 1.2 2.0 29
Ortho- Phosphates PPM 0.00 0.01 0.04 30
Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.2 0.4 0.9 30
Total Ammonia PPM 0.01 0.02 0.06 30
Chemical Data 2001- 2003
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.D PPM 0.9 1.6 2.9 33Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.00 0.01 0.03 33Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.2 0.2 0.7 35Total Ammonia PPM 0.01 0.03 0.06 35Biological Quality
1999 1996 1994 1992 1987 1984 1982 1980 19784-5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4~5 4
Station No: 0400 location: Bridge u/s Lough Gara
A value displayed in BOLD indicates the value falls outside either an upper or lower
threshold or highlights stations where there may be water quality problems.
Chemical Data 1995 - 1997
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.O PPM 0.5 1.6 6.3 39Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.09 4.93 42
Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.1 1.1 5.1 35Total Ammonia PPM 0.14 0.14 0.60 31
Chemical Data 1998 ~ 2000
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.D PPM 1.0 1.8 2.5 29
Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.04 0.43 30Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.2 0.6 1.0 30Total Ammonia PPM 0.03 0.06 0.17 30
Chemical Data 2001 - 2003
Parameters Units Minimum Median Maximum No of Samples
B.O.D PPM 1.2 1.8 2.8 33Ortho-Phosphates PPM 0.01 0.03 0.28 35Oxidised Nitrogen PPM 0.3 0.7 3.0 35Total Ammonia PPM 0.02 0.05 0.22 35
Biological Quality
2002 1999 1996 1994 1992 1987 1984 1982 1980 1982 1980 19784 3 2-3 2 3-4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 8
River Data Trends
B.O.D.
Egg
ooo
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
+1995 -L997
--ts1998 - 2000
--F2001- 2003
-+-1995 - 1997
+1998-2000
+2001-2003
Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
Oxidised Nitrogen1.6
1.4Et t.2
A1os 0.82
3 0'6
* 0.4o
0.2
0
Phosphates (Ortho)0.1
0.090.08
f, o.ozI o.oo* o.osst 0.04
S o.o.o.o20.01
0
-+1995 -1997
+1998 - 2000
-+2001- 2003
Figh Bridge Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s lough Gara
Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s lougb Gara
Attachment 8
River Data Trends
B.O.O.2.5
2 1995 - 1997
E1998 - 2000
0- 1.5c.. 2001 - 200300 1a:.
0.5
0
Figh Bridge Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
Phosphates (Ortho)0.1 ---- _ ..-
0.09
0.08 -+-1995 - 1997E 0.07Q. 1998 - 2000c..
0.06IIIIII 2001 - 2003- 0.05I'll
..c:.Q. 0.04If>0
.J::. 0.03Q.
0.02
0.01
0
Figh Bridge Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
Oxidised Nitrogen1.6
1.4 -+-1995 - 1997Ec.. 1.2 1998 - 20000-
CQl 1 2001 - 2003l>O0...
0.8.!::z"0 0.6IIIIII
:0 0.4x0
0.2
0
jFigh Bridge Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
L -
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Total Ammonia
EILo.gcaEEt!
o
0-16
0.14
o.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
o.o2
0
-F1995 - 1997
-{-1998 -2000
+2001- 2003
Figh Bridge Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
5.0
xtu
E 4.0.=t!3 .
(J
if,
so6 . 'vE
1.0
-\
Attachment 8
*Figh Bridge
-l-Bridge W. Of Banada
*Bridge u/s Lough Gara
Biological Quality
S O ( \ I < t t \ N \ i t . o o t NF € o o € € o l o r c n o r oo t o ) o ' r o r c n o r o r o r o l or{ <{ r{ <{ rl i{ d r{ r.l t\l
*L)
Bridge W. Of Banada Bridge u/s Lough Gara
I
I
I
I
I
I
0.16
0.14
E 0.12Q.Q.
til 0.1'20 0.08EECl: 0.06 -"iii.- 0,040I-
0.02
0
•
Figh Bridge
Total Ammonia
• •
Attachment 8
~1995 -1997
___ 1998 - 2000
2001- 2003
I------ -----------------'
Biological Quality
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
L
5.0
X41
] 4.0>.~n;a 3.0n;u'til~ 2.0iii
1.000 0 N <:t r-- N <:t 'Cl en Nr-- 00 00 00 00 en en en a- Den en en en en en en en en D...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... N
-- -- --- -- -- -
~Figh Bridge
Bridge W. Of Banada
Bridge u/s lough Gara
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
f-
oz=
$f
o
(o
oz
rO
oz
cr)
oz
N
oz
r
.iz
aQs u l
e d:z _ I C )P
J ( U<ot rEF . c
k t Qr o E
5E-6 u i
E d ?
EE#s B:H5 ri"
sp
EE!IH-Fg;o f r H
= I EE H E
E
3e 'z6Ez6 d
XELl
' ' ' i$ ' - \
'\ ,6'rra ' j
. - i t l
" r l i l' i l l'\., \ i '
j t
o i . . . r w iA r \ i /r g ' \ . r v i ^ \o' t",. ..--'-- il \l \ . , \ . 1 , irt---- -'r j, A\---,t'i , \ r / ' i l
. , \' 'i\.-r./=-i_-=-.- . ,
l \ , ti ' \ . r I .
, r\ \., ,#' \ ' i A . i
I - i , * l '
. , \ ( v , / "V !
') u\ - ..'--rli.. j
'r t' i )r --ri i { - r i i ' \
\ . i t ,o,..,' j, 'i' '\,
.t' .r4 i E
I'
~,
:--
'.-
~~
,~
,-
.-,..
..,..
..,..
..,..
.......
--
,....
--
--
NO
.3N
O.6
NO
.7=M
.a.
l.~
l,O
ClIE
YCl
AY
'11m
!~
CO
OEU
StO
Ole
)
g;
1,4
--':
J---"-
'----,.-o~c
lWlK
_PE
Al
-'~c
lWlK
BR
OO
llpt
A1
P't
iCA
£'f0
)..1
(o.<
UIl)
u
-'T
OPS
OIL
'
NO
.5
lWlK
CA£'f
CO
OlIt
YCl
Ay
\IIIN
f'RE
OU
INTl!OULD~
(CK
US)
~gO"
lWlK
_Pf
/.I
,go
.2.
0
p-U
et<f:Y
C\.A
Y(O
OlS
):lo
=l"..J
.c
NO
.4
=l,
O
_-=.
2.0
·-:.0
.4tO
PSOI
L
Il"'
K8I
lO...
.P[
AI
P'l
£C
REY
I;RA
I1ll1
WY
"""
OC
CAS
'Ot<
AI,
CO
B8\
LS(o
.UB
)
ToPS
OIL
.r-
----
t'""
Ol
~Et8~
P[A
1I
IIl
"'K
_Cl
AY
=I,I~
et<f:Y
WI1
llY
ClA
Y=
1.B
I"IIl
<f'R
ECiV
OIT
cooe
u:s
p't
i,Cl
ll:Y
L-..
..L."
'·Z,O
Glt
<\U
lYSUl~
CU
Y(r
wJB
u'<
>'J
.l
NO
.1N
O.2
TR
IAL
HO
LE
S(i
nd
ica
ted
thu
s)~
:t> r+ .-+
Cl.l n ::J"" 3 I'tl
:J ,.... U)
N ~
- ~~
, / ,-..)/ "
i /}i
/
-...._"
~\-.--
\\.
.J"
\--
\.\
\'
!-
...
...,
"'7\\\\
../J'~:~
~":~'<:~--
'---...---
,G
"tJ
/0~-l---
'\YC'~\
;--
-...
'...
,;:/
If".'.
--.:
:Jr
'".--
""
-}\
/"'
\_
I/A
/'/'~~,
-""'
-Jd~
-'-
/~_/"
//
,?
"..
//
,,_..
c\,
"<:
..'..
.."'"~_-,._~
\\
1,,,
",;;--
'"
.-
•"~''
'\.__
:::.
,/'
vC
)'.
\...
.....
..\.
,i
L./..
..(
/'..
~-"'"
,.~
.~.
.~
\".,~
~:;d2d.;;;;~
..
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Soil Type
Parent Material
Attachment 10
3.272.86
Broad PhysiographicDivisions
l*,,ron Il*'''.!I z.gs I
2.78 |
Associated Soils !
Peaty Gleys { 25 } Sandstone glacial tiil
Grey Erown PodrolicsLimestone glacial illlt t 0 l
I s.7s Il 5o8 l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I.
Attachment 10
Soil Type
Broad Physiographic Soil Association I Parent Material Fer C811 0110lai areaDivisions Nos. Prificipal Soil Associmd Soils
I Gleys 1751 PeatY Glays 125 I JsandSlOne glacial lill 2·9521 2'781----------- Grey Brown POdlOlics ILImes(one glacial lill I 3'27 I3 - Gleys" (90 I ( 10) 2·86
I
I
I
I
IL
I
,
l
l
I 44 IBasin Peal ~5'795·08L..--- _
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
,)
tIItIIIItI
IIIIIIIII
I
Attachment L0
SOILS OF FI-/IT TO UNDULATING LOWLAND I 13
The principal soil within the association consists of a moderately well drained Crey BrownPodzolic of loam to clay loam texture and of medium to high base status. The profile is characterisedby a slightly plastic consistency and weak structure which becomes massive in the lower part of the Bhonzon at about 65 cm. Clay and silt contents in the surface horizon are about 25%o and 30Yorespectively but the clay content increases to over 30Yoin the B horizon.
The principal soil gives way very quickly to a less well-drained soil in the flatter areas, whichcomprise about25oh of the association. (This soil has been mapped as Association 40 where it occursextensively). This associated soil has a clay loam surface horizon and a clay loam to silty clay loamBtg horizon with silt content in the B horizon generally greater than 40%o.lt usually has a very highbase status. Some gravelly Brown Earths and minimal Grey Brown Podzolics are also present inplaces to a small extent in this association. These latter soils are found generally on kames, crests ofhillocks and terraces. They are mostly formed from fluvioglacial material. Surface texture is sandyloam to loam, and the soils are moderately shallow with rapid permeability.
SuitabilityThe principal soil has a moderately wide use range. It is suitable for grassland but is also used fortillage, including intensive production of vegetables for the Dublin market. The soil is not ideal fortillage because of its heavy texture, weak structure and sticky consistency but, because it occurs in anarea oflow rainfall, it can be successfully used for these purposes. In grassland, poaching by livestockcan be a problem in spring and autumn but this can be overcome by good grassland management.
The more poorly drained associated Gley (25%) presents greater problems for tillage and hasto be worked when moisture conditions are optimum.
The use range of the associated Brown Earths and Grey Brown Podzolics is moderately goodbut restricted somewhat by slope, shallowness and drought. Due to scale limitation these latter soilsare not shown separately on the soil map.
ASSOCIATION 39:
GLEYS 9070, GREY BROWN PODZOLICS 10%
The soils of this association occupy 3.45% of the country (583,630 ac.; 236,192 ha.). They occurwidely throughout the limestone till areas of the country where they occupy the more lowlyingpositions. The principal soil is a poorly drained Gley of clay loam to clay texture and of high basestatus. It is found mainly in Lirnerick, Roscommon, Galway, Tipperary, Laois, Kilkenny, Kildare.Cork and other counties to a more limited extent. In many places. however, it is not possible to showit separately on the map because of its occurrence in small enclaves. But it constitutes the mainassociated soil in Associations 3l and 34 especially.
The profile is characterised by a thick, strongly gleyed textural B horizon which merges withthe parent material at approximately 150 cm depth. Clay content is high, ranging from about 40/o inthe surface to almost 50%:o in the parent material, while silt contents range from about 30% in thesurface to 40o/o in the oarent material.
•...SOILS OF FLAT TO UNDULATiNG LOWLAND
Attachment 10
113
I
I..-j
The principal soil within the association consists of a moderately well drained Grey BrownPodzolic of loam to clay loam texture and of medium to high base status. The profile is characterisedby a slightly plastic consistency and weak structure which becomes massive in the lower pan of the Bhorizon at about 65 em. Clay and silt contents in (he surface horizon are about 25% and 30%respectively but the clay content increases to over 30% in the B horizon.
The principal soil gives way very quickly to a less well-drained soil in the flatter areas, whichcomprise about 25% of the association. (This soi I has been mapped as Association 40 where it occursextensively). This associated soil has a clay loam surface horizon and a clay loam to silty clay 10a111Btg horizon with silt content in the B horizon generally greater than 40%. H usually has a very highbase status. Some gravelly Brown Earths and minimal Grey Brown Podzolics are also present inplaces to a small extent in this association. These latter soils are found generally on kames, crests ofhillocks and terraces. They are mostly formed from fluvioglacial material. Surface texture is sandyloam to loam, and the soils are moderately shallow with rapid permeability.
SuitabilityThe principal soil has a moderately wide use range. It is suitable for grassland but is also Llsed fortillage, including intensive production of vegetables for the Dublin market. The soil is not ideal fortillage because of its heavy texture, weak structure and sticky consistency but, because it occurs in anarea of low rainfall. it can be successfully used for these purposes. In grassland, poaching by livestockcan be a problem in spring and autumn but this can be overcome by good grassland management.
The more poorly drained associated Gley (25%) presents greater problems for tillage and hasto be worked when moisture conditions are optimum.
The usc range of the associated Brown Eanhs and Grey Brown Podzol ics is moderately goodbut restricted somewhat by slope. shallowness and drought. Due to scale limitation these latter soilsare not shown separately on the soil map.
ASSOCIATlON 39:
GLEYS 90%, GREY BROWN PODZOLICS 10%
The soils of this association occupy 3.45% of the country (583,630 ae.; 236,192 ha.). They occurwidely throughout the limestone till areas of the country where they occupy {he more lowlyingpositions. The principal soil is a poorly drained Gley of clay loam to clay texture and of high basestatus. It is found mainly in Limerick. Roscommon, Galway, Tipperary, Laois. Kilkenny, Kildare.Cork and other counties to a more limited extent. In many places. however, it is nol possible 10 showit separately on the map because of its occurrence in small enclaves. But it constitutes the mainassociated soil in Associations 31 and 34 especially.
The proti Ie is characterised by a th ick, strongly gleyed textural B horizon which merges withthe parent material at approximately 150 cm depth. Clay content is high, ranging from about 40% inthe surface to almost 50% in the parent material, while silt contents range from about 30% in thesurface to 40% in the parent material.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
t 1 4
Attachment 10
EXPLANATORY BULLETIN TO SOIL MAP OF IREI-4ND I98O\ ; i
Plate l7: The heavy-textured Gley soils of Association 39 hwe a serious drainage problem.
Structure is weak in the upper horizons and becomes massive with depth; only tlre upper horizons arefriable. The poor drainage is caused by the heavy texture and by the slow run-off due to the relietwhich is aggravated by the poor perrneability of the soils themselves.
In Laois, where this soil is relatively extensive (Mountmellick, Portlaoise, Mountrath area),there is a strong influence of sandstone in the parent material and the entire profile is more sandy(organic sandy loam). The well-drained associated soil in this area is similar to the principal soil ofAssociation 36 which occurs immediately to the east.
SuitabilityBecause of their poor drainage, these soils have a limited use range and are suited mainly to pasture.Susceptibility to poaching is a problem and good management is necessary to sustain maximumproduction. Ifa suitable outfall can be obtained they can be successfully drained.
As indicated above, this soil is often associated on the landscape with Associations 34 and 31.The well-drained associated soil within this association (10%) is a Grey Brown Podzolic similar to theprincipal soils of Associations 3 I and 34. The use range is also similar.
Ii-
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
114 EXPLANATORY BULLETIN TO SOIL MAP OF iRELAND 1980
Attachment 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plate 17: nle heavy-textured Gley soils ofAssociation 39 have a serious drainage problem.
Structure is weak in the upper horizons and becomes massive with depth; only the upper horizons arefriable. The poor drainage is caused by the heavy texture and by the slow run-off due to the relief.which is aggravated by the poor permeability orthe soils themselves.
In Laois, where this soil is relatively extensive (Mountmellick, Ponlaoise, Mountralh area),there is a strong inOuence of sandstone in the parent material and the entire profile is more sandy(organic sandy loam). The well-drained associated soil in this area is similar to the principal soil ofAssociation 36 which occurs immediately to the east.
SuitabilityBecause of their poor drainage, these soils have a limited use range and are suited mainly to pasture.Susceptibility to poaching is a problem and good management is necessal)' to sustain maximumproduction. lfa suitable outfall can be obtained they can be successfully drained.
As indicated above, this soil is often a~sociatcd on the landscape with Associations 34 and 31.The well-drained associated soil within this association (10%) is a Grey Brown Podzolic similar to theprincipal soils or Associations 31 and 34. The use range is also similar.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 10
SOILS OF FLAT TO UNDULATING LOWL"AND
Principal Soil - Association 39: Gley
Depth (cm)
0 - 1 5
t5-25
25-45
45-60
60-112
Be low 1 l 2
i l5
Topography:Slope;
Altitude:
Vegetation:
Drainage:Parent material:
Horizon
A l l g
A129
A ) o
BZtg
FlatI "
79 m O.D.
Old pasture (Junco Molinietum sub-association ofTrifoluim repens)Poorly drainedGlacial till predominantly of limestone compostion withadmixture of shale, sandstone and volcanics; ofMidlandian age.
Association
CIay to clay loam, dark-brown (10 YR 3/3) with many,fine, faint, yellowish-red (5 YR 4/8) mottles; weak, finecrumb structure; friable; abundant, diffuse roots;gradual, smooth boundary to:Clay to clay loam; light-grey to grey (10 YR 6/1) withmany, fine, distinct, strong-brown (7.5 YR 5/6) mottles;moderately weak, medium sub-angular blockystructure; friable; plentiful, diffuse roots; gradual,smooth boundary to:Clay loam; light brownish-grey (10 YR 6/2) with many,fine, distinct reddish-yellow (7.5 YR 6/6) mottles;massive structure; wet, slightly plastic; few roots;gradual, smooth boundary to:Clay; light brownish-grey (10 YR 612) with common,medium, distinct, strong-brown (7.5 YR 5/6) mottles;massive structure; wet, plastic; few roots; diffuse,smooth boundary to:Silty clay; strong-brown (7.5 YR 5/6) with common,medium, prominent, light-grey to grey (10 YR 6/l)mottles; massive structure; wet, plastic; very few roots
Si l ty clay; grey (10 YR 6/ l ) rnassive structure, moist,sticky and slightly plastic.
Analytical data
B3g
CG
Free
iron%
Hor. sand%
Coarse Fine CEC TEB Base
pH meq/I00g meq/I00g sat. % C% N% C/Nsand o4 Si l t % Clay
A l l eA l 2 9
(A2)eB2tg
B 3 g
5 . 86 .0
6 .8
1 .9
8 .3
29.81 8 . 8
I 1 . 8
r 0.58 . 5
22.71 6 . 8
l689
Sat.
Sat.
Sat.
t 2 13 3 i 42l0 t 4 33 43
i l 15 35 39
683848
664 t41
8 .6 0 .8 | 10 .6 r . 83.7 0.43 8.6 r .8
0.9 0. l4 6.4 | .2
0. i 0 .04 2.0
0 .3 0 .03 t . 7
t
79 m O.D.
Old pasture (Junco Molinietum sub-association ofTrifoluim repens)Poorly drained
Glacial till predominantly of limestone composlion withadmixture of shale, sandstone and volcanics; ofMidlandian age.
Topography:
Slope:
Altitude:
Vegetation:
Drainage:
Parent material:
SOILS OF FLAT TO UNDUUTlNG LOWLAND
Principal Soil- Association 39: GreyFlat
1°
Attachment 10
115
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horizon
Allg
A!2g
A2g
132lg
B3g
CG
Depth (em)
0-15
15-25
25-45
45-60
60-112
Below 112
Association
Clay to clay loam. dark-brown ([ a YR 3/3) with many.fine, faint, yellowish-red (5 YR 4/8) mottles; weak, finecrumb structure; friable; abundant, diffuse roots;gradual. smooth boundary 10:
Clay to clay loam; light-grey to grey (10 YR 6/1) withmany, tine, distinct. strong-brown (7.5 YR 5/6) mOllles;moderately weak. medium sub-angular blockystructure; friable; plent iful. di {fuse roots; gradual.smooth boundary to:Clay loam; light brownish-grey (10 YR 6/2) with many,nne, distinct reddish-yellow (7.5 YR 6/6) mOllles;massive structure; wet, sl ightly plastic; few roots;gradual, smooth boundary to:Clay; light brownish-grey (10 YR 612) with common,med ium, distinct, strong-brown (7.5 Y R 5/6) mottles;massive structure; wet. plastic; few roots; diffuse.smooth boundary to:Silty clay; strong-brown (7.5 YR 5/6) with common,medium. prominenc. light-grey to grey (10 YR 6/l)mottles; massive struCllJre; wet, plastic; very few roots
Silty clay: grey (lOY R 6/1) massive structure. moist.sticky and slightly plastic.
I
l
Analytical data
Coarse Fine CEC TEB Base Free
Hor. sand sand % Sill % Clay pH meq/lOOg meq/ IOOg sal. % C% N% CIN Irono/.) %
All e. 12 13 33 42 5.8 29.8 22.7 76 8.6 0.81 10.6 1.8AI2g 10 14 33 43 6.0 18.8 16.8 89 3.7 0.43 8.6 1.8
(A2)g 11 15 35 39 6.8 11.8 Sat. 0.9 0.14 6.4 1.2
132tg 6 8 38 48 7.9 10.5 Sal. 0.3 0.04 2.0
B3g 6 6 41 47 8.3 8.5 Sat. 0.3 0.03 1.7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
rlrY0t)
I
Io
E
$lori
j|,
IF
l
Attachment 11
to
€
c.I@@
_cL{}I
r{aoFtsc)
B
n
ET'
lsg
E(t)
so
ts
g
_g
cP
*>
t5
sE
;lDEf
CO
sEo
E
E>'0
toE,'g
FJIo*
.i
;+i;::;.
. i " ,
" {} .,-
4r i 1i;;'.1J$! .. $
4 A B:{F#
o
ry
;t -.
in
coE
t-
JooFo-{o
:Iii ( 'r ( Y )i | \
I r"ii-s9-
H
_u('@
E3 E; e l:q;i;:;
iiiiiiiiiiiliIi,i#liiiiil,ii,iis
th
-'FUO(/)
tltrouloJCLGE
{f
€f
Ia
IoP
l00=
I
'fuiT.::l, i
e,...^....,]..--.,--.,ofP~
..rve
y~Iand
__
..•ic
VII!
!I!!I!
IIII
--
----.
_-'
-.._.
--
--
~·tp:I/~.;:mn~.;:.IC/_JqI~'{Slle-_~l~
~~
1I(.;
IIlI(
)I~
4to
~H
elptl
Ma
pL
eg
en
d
Na
tio
na
lD
raft
8f:o
droc
kA
qu
ife
rM
ap
Rl
.R~IOndll)
Imp
ol"
'nlAqult~r
.F
issu
red
bedl
c><:
kR
k.
R4
!1jIO
nd
ll)Im
po
lla
nt
Aq
ulle
-,•
Ka
,sllfl
ed
Rkd
.R~lonally
Impo'lAlnIAQ~lter
.K
a,s
\\lI
ed
Idlf1
US
f:1
Inc·
Re
gio
na
lly
Imp
orl
an
lA
qu
"e'
.K
s,s
\\lI
ed
(co
nd
ulll
lm•
lo<
;all
yIm
po
I",n
lA
qu
ila
r.S
ed
loC
kw
hic
hIS
Ge
ne
rally
Mo
de
'i1e
lyP
'od
uc;
Uve
Lk
•Lo
c:.a
llyIm
po
lla
nlA
qu
ila
r.!<
.<Ir
sUlle
d
LI
.LO
c:.ll
lyIm
pe
ria
l'llA
qu
lle
'.
Be
dra
c'
...h
lc;h
Is,"
,od
e/d
Uly
Pro
c:lu
cll.
eo
nly
InLo
c;al
Zo
ne.
PI
.P
oo
rAqull~r
.B
ed
rOC
kw
hlc
nIS
Ge
ne
lally
Un
p,o
llu
Ctl
ve
uc;e
pt
\0'
Loc.
-.I
,zo
ne
sP
u·1
'00
'A
qu
Ife
r.~rock
wh
ich
IsG
en
era
llyU
np
rod
ucti
ve
Uncl~s'fled
Se
ttin
gs
PI
~S\T~
o2
kmCO;Jy'r!ghll~~
Ord
na
nce
SU
MlY
Ire
lan
d'G
ove
rnm
an
lol1
r8ia
nd
Ord
na
n-:
eS
urv
eyIre~ncJ
lMil;
!ce
nle
r:1
60
71
6.
:<
~ nJ n :r 3 (1)
:l .... I-'
I-'
lof2
Sca
le:
1::8
3,73
3M
apT
ool:
()
Pan
0510
8n00
812
:33
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
.+q:ic.t
ao
c.loo
Attachment 12+o
I
l )l 1
*Eo
- l
$
I,9^t
t i
a1l'l
e:
I
{n
htsc,sc
i ! .
ET
-ghoe
gl
t[
it
trE_{u=cFEYo
c
;oeU'
c$
E
5
E
L.1
@_g$
**t t *l
(,m
c!u(u6
qf
o
ryTF'q
EJ
€f
€f
trIEo.
.f*Etr
J
F6
oE
t€Ihg:F
!?g
: : r q= 4
: 9 5
E g o= : l> , 6 3t - i l l -' : 5 c E 5t - ; - c =L * : = E > 1 4
! $ E ; € 5 Tr g. F = ' ' r d hL u 4 , t ! E r i E i
tteoooJctGE
Io
l5
IoP
jto
l
Va
nffi
--.,tu
gl_
_rv~";lan~.icV~
--
--
--
--
-....,."rp:/f~.,;~
•..:.ie/j~
J4fu
R•. J
vt'?si{eJ!~~._Sj~
~Ei
ft,,,
l{'»
~4t
o~
Help~
Ma
pL
eg
en
d
lril>
hIn
teri
mV
UIi'
)(lr
ab
ility
•E
(Re>
<:.k
l'1...
..'SUlt8C~
01
K~('l1
e.E
.Jr\J~m~
11•
Hig
h
M•
Mo
de
rate
L·
Lo
w
HL
•H
igh
10L
ow
.O
nly
an
Inte
tlm
stu
dy(oo~
p13C
II.
Wa
te'
Se
ttin
gs,
5
.n
~ITt
'0i
'211m
C.o
;Jyr
gh
l't:
Old
n(l
llce
Su
rve
yIr
ela
nd
/Go
vem
me
nlo
lila
lan
dO
rdn
an
ceS
urv
ey
Ir;ll
an
dlM
apce
nte
r:1
60
77
6.~
» ::f w ('I
::T 3 ttl
::J .... ~ IV
lof2
Sca
le:
1:18
3, 7
33
Map
Too
l:f"7
Pa
n
05/0
8120
0812
:34
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
IIIIIIIIIIIr"
.t1
o-(It!r
o!oo
CL
Ec(o
+to=cooat(g
J
/
VI...c0rol....Q(J
o....o
...cQ..
""C00 Co rooN +-'
<lJ
5.........coob.(rtl-.I
IIIIIIIIIII.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
WATER
The Receiving Envi ronment
River Lung
General
The River Lung rises in low hills west of Ballaghaderreen Co. Roscommon. and
follou's an east-south-east course until just south of Ballaghaderreen when it turns
north-west to flou' into the southern basin of Lough Gara. Perhaps because of it's
fairly flat profile. the Lung is a fairll' sluggish river especialh, in summer Previouslr,
the lower reaches around Ballaghaderreen were particularly prone to very extensive
land flooding As a consequence. the OPW instituted an arterial drainage scheme
about to alleviate the floodinq. The scheme began about l4 vears ago at the discharge
to Lough Gara and since then has progressed up the channel lt rvas completed in
r 996
W;ater cpnltt.t - ('hcmrcal
A sumnran of 10 u'ater analvsis runs at four stations on the fuver Lung made between
1987 and 1990 bv the ERU are presented in Table l . The results shou'the water of
the Lun.' to be alkal ine u,i th median pH values and conductivity of 7 6-7.7 and i40-
i80 uSrcm respectivei l , This chemistn, points to a l imestone geoloqv The present
\ry'ater anah'ses. taken during a fallinrr flood in the river also indicate that the water can
be hishh' coloured This obsen'ation is consistent w' i th both recent and historical
measurenrents in Lougii Gai-a (Table 5a & 5b) and probabl), results from peatv soi ls in
the catchnrent
Table I N4edian \ \ /ater analvsis results for l0 sampl ine dates belu,een 1987 and1990 on the lo rver reaches o f the Lung fu r ,e r (F lanagan & Lark in 1992)
Parameters [ j n i ts Banada Br idse Floa t Br idee
DO o/o Sal 90 85
B O.D mq/I. 02'1 .6
l 9
N,IRP ms4. P 00r7 0 r0 :Oxid ised- N i t rosen nrr-/I. N 0 i 80 0. -5 i0
Total Anrnronia mq/I. nN 0 040 0 . t 00
N{RP = lr{olvbdate React ive Phosphate = Ortho-P
z + o
Attachment 14
\VATER
The Receiving Environment
River Lung
Gel/eral
The River Lung rises in low hills west of Ballaghaderreen Co. Roscommon, and
follows an east-sQuth-easl cou rse until juS! south of Ballaghaderreen when it tu ms
nonh-west \(J [10\\' into the southern basin of Lough Gara Perhaps because of It" s
fairly flal profile, !he Lung is a fairly slugg.ish river especially in summer. PrevioLlsh'
the lower reaches around Ballaghaderreen were panicularly prone 10 vef)' eXl enSlve
land flooding As a consequence. (he OPW instituted an anerial drainage scheme
about to alleVlillC' Ihe flooding. The scheme began about 14 years ago at the discharQ.e
10 LOll!!h Garil {ll1d since then has progressed up the channel 11 \Vas complclcd In
1996
A summary of 1(1 W31 er ana 1"51 s ru 115 at f(lU r slalio ns on I he R.i ver Lu ng made bet ween
1987 and 1990 b"lhe ERL are presenled In Table l. The results sho\\ lhe water of
th(' Lung to be alkaline Wilh median pH values and condliClivi\}' of 7 6-7 7 and 340
380 p S/CIl) respcci\\ieiy Thi~ Chenmlf\: poill1s (0 a limeslone geolog:' The prcsem
water 3IJRlvSt'S, taken cJurin~ a falling flood in the river al50 indicate that the water call
be hi!!hl\- coloured This ohservatiol) is consistenl wilh both recenl and hisloric;i1
measurelllt'ms 111 Lough Ga,a (Table :,a & ,':;b) and probablv results frorn peal\' soils 111
the calcln 1\..111
Table J t\1cdi<l1l W(I\er anal\'sis results ror 10 sampling dllles be-tween 1987 and1990 on the lower reaches of the Lung River (r1anJgan &. Larkin 199:2)
Paramc!crs {Inils f3:ln:'\da Bridge float R"id2('
D.O. % sa! 90 S5
13,0.0 nHll1. 02 1 6 19
, t\1RP n1!!/l. P 0.017 0 10:'
I Oxidiscd-~ilrO!!CIl mull. \1 O.~80 0.5:\0
TOla) Ammonia mull. N oO~O o 100
l\1 RP = ~101 \/bd al c RCilCl i \'C' PhOSp!liH C = On ho- J>
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
The nutrient chemistry results would suggest that the catchment of the Lung is not
intensively farmed as the nitrate (oxidised nitrogen), phosphate (MRP) and ammonia
levels were relatively low at Banada Bridge which is upstream of all the main point-
source discharges to the river. More recently these same parameters were again
measured at both Float and Banada Bridges on l3 occasions between August I4th and
November 17 1994 producing generally similar median results (Table 2)
Table 2 Median concentrations of key u,ater quality parameters measured onthe Lung fuver on l3 dates between 2418/94 and 17 ll l/94 b1, the EPA(Kilmartin 1995)
These more recent figures confirm the earlier ERU data and indicate that at Float
Bridge doumstream of ali the main industrial and municipal discharges from the
Ballaghaderreen area. the water qualitl'undergoes a significant change u,ith increases
in BOD. phosphate (N,IRP). total ammonia, and oxidised nitrogen (effectivel1, nitrate)
and a decrease in dissolved ox)'gen (D O.)
It is clear from these fiqures that the lower reaches of fuver Lung betu'een the
confluence of the Triburan' Stream* belou, Banada Bridge and the confluence with
Lough Gara. can be classified as moderatell'polluted or nutrient enriched
Llat c r O ual i r.1, - B r ol og ca I
The biological water qualin'monitoring results generated since the earlv 1970's are
generally in agreement u'ith the water quality results as outlined above. Table i
presents these. includine data for 1996 which has not yet been published bv the EPA
Parameters Uni ts Banada Bridee Float Bridge
D.O men. 02 10 4 95
B O.D men. 02 l6 21
MRP nro/l P 0 022 0 188
Oxidised-Nitroeen ms/l. N 0 298 0 422
Total -Ammonia me/I. N 00r5 0 lo i
A - f
,I
I
I...
Attachment 14
The nutrient chemistry results would suggest that the catchment of the Lung is not
intensively fanned as the nitrate (oxidised nitrogen), phosphate (MRP) and ammonia
levels were relatively low at Banada Bridge which is upstream of all the main point
source discharges to the river. More recently these same parameters were again
measured at both Float and Banada Bridges on J:) occasions between August 14th and
November 17 1994 producing generally similar median results (Table 2)
I
l
Table :2 Median concentrations of key v,-'ater quality parameters measured onthe Lung River on 13 dates between 24/8/94 and 17/1 ]/94 by the EPA(Kilmartin 1995)
1
IlI
I.
..
lI
Parameters Units Banada Bridge FloM Brid2e
D.O. mQ,l1. 02 10.4 9.5
BO.D. mQ./l, 02 1.6 2.1
MRP m~A p 0.022 0.188
Oxid ised -Nit rOQen m!2/l, N 0.29S 0.4:22
Total.'\mmonia mull. ~ 0.01 S 0.103
These more recent figLIres confirm the earlier ERU data and indicate thaI at Floa!
Bridge dO\AlJ\stream of all the main industrial and municipal discharges from the
Ballaghaderreen area. the water qualify undergoes a significant change with increases
in BOD. phosphate ()\.'1RP), tOtal ammonia, and oxidised ni tregen (effect ively mtra te)
and a decrease in dissolved oxygen (D.O.).
11 is clear fTom these figlJres that the lower reaches of Rjver Lung between the
confluence of the Tributary SHeam~' below Banada Bridge and the confluence with
Lough Gara, can be classified ?s moderately polluted or nutrielll enriched
Wafer Qllalil)' - Hlolof:ical
The biological water qualit\· monitoring results generaled since rile earl\' 1970's are
generally in agreement \A1th the water quality results as outlined above. Table.)
presents these, including data for 1996 which has not ye1 been published bv the EPA.
47
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
Table 3 Biological waterand pers. comm.
quality results , 'Q values', (EPA Clabby et al. 1995)
McGarrigle, EPA (1996 results).
III
Station
No.
Station Name
01 00 Figh Bridee
0200 Crunaun Bridee
0250 1 km S. ofBallachaderreen
03 i0 100m d/s sampl ine Stat ion 0300
03 50 Banada Bridqe
0400 Float Bridee (uis Lou.rh Gara)
These results indicate a fair l l ' consistent good to fair water qualiry ( i e non-polluted)in the upper and middle reaches of the River Lung as far as Banada Bndge. u,i th Q -s
Q 4-5 or Q4 predominatine in contrast the lower reaches as exemplif ied by the FloatBridge results have been nroderatel l ' pol luted in recent \/ears. This has beenparticularly obvious since 1994 when a Q2 (serious pollurion) u,as f irsr detecred Themosl recent analysis carried out b1, the EPA indicated some recoven' since 1994 to a
Q 2-3 ( i e. nroderate to senous pollut ion) The reduced u,arer quali t l , in rhe lou,erreaches of the river is also manifested b1, a luxuriate filanrentous {Ireen aleal grou,th
durinq the summer months The 1994 deterioration in quali ty was associated ri , i th averl' serious fish kill on the lo',ver reaches of the river when it is reported that severalthousand course fish rvere killed
Fisherie.r
As the Lunq is quite a slugrish r ir. 'er ir rvould natural l lr tend to favour coarse ratherthan qame fish. The fact that the Lung has also been dredged reinforces rhis tendencvSeveral decades ago the Lunq is reported to have had a qood trout f isher1, Hou,ever.
4 8
Station.
No.
t97r 197 4 r978 1980 1982 1984 r987 t992 1994 1996
0l 00 4-5 5 4-5 4-5
0200 _5 5 A <1 ' J
A.* 5 Aa 4-5
0250 At 4
03r0 4-5
0350 5 4-5 I 4-5 4 4 4 4 40400 5 4-5 J 4 + 3-4 2
t
Table 3
Attachment 14
Biological water quality results, 'Q values', (EPA Clabby et al. 1995)and pers. comm. McGarrigle. EPA (1996 results).
lI..
I..
I..
Station. 1971 1974 1978 ]980 1982 1984 1987 1992 1994 1996
No.
0100 - - 4-5 5 5 5 4-5 4-5 - -
0200 5 S 4-5 4 5 5 4 4-5 - -
0250 - - - - - - 4 4 - -
0310 - - - - - - 4-5 - - -0350 5 4-5 4 4-5 4 4 .3 4 4 4
0400 5' 4-~ ,) ..l 4 4 -' 3-4 2 2-3
Station Station Name
No.
0100 rig,h Bridge
0200 ICrunaun BridQc:'
0250 :' km S or Balla!..'haderreen
0310 100m dIs samp[ill~ Station 0300
0350 Banada BridQC-
0400 Float Brid\!e (UiS Lou!.!h Gara)
These results indicate a fairl~' consistent good to fair water qualiry (i.e nOll-polluted)
in the upper and middle rCilches of the River Lung as far as Banada Bridge. 'With 0 ~
o4-5 or Q4 predominating In contrast the lower reaches as exemplified b~' the Float
Bridge rcsulls havc been moderately polluted in reeCIl! ycars This has been
particularly obvious since 199.:1 when a 02 (serious pollution) was first delccted. The
mOSl recent analysis carried out by the EP A indical ed some recave!)' since 1994 to a
Q 2-~ (i.e modcrate 10 ~erious pollution). The reduced water quality in the lower
reaches of the river is al~o manifested by a luxuriate filamenlous g.reen algal gro\V1h
during the summer months The 1994 deterioration in qUlllily was associmed With (\
Vc!)' serious fish kill on the lower reaches of the river when il is reponed that severa)
thousand course fish were killed
Fisheries
As [he Lung is quite a sluggish ri\'cr it would nalUrally lend to r,1\'OUr coarse rather
than game fish. The facl thal the Lung has also been dredged reinforces this lendency
Several decades ago the Lung 15 reponed 10 have had a good trOllt fishery However.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
it is now dominated by coarse fish, particularly in the lower reaches. even though trout
are occasionally caught in the middle and upper reaches. The main species present are
bream, pike rudd. roach and eel. The river is fished by the Ballaghaderreen & District
Angling Club (B&DAC) with a membership of 70 and an active core of about 20-30
anglers. Competitions are held on a roughly monthly basis both on the Lung and on
Lough Gara.
The river is also fished by visiting British anglers. especially in the months of April and
May before the level in the river drops (pers. comm. Mr. Matt Nolan, Fisheries
Inspector, Shannon Regional Fisheries Board, SRFB) According to a club
spokesman, visiting anglers staying in local accommodation numbered several hundred
in the earll' 1990's and while substantial numbers still come. there has been a
pronounced decline since the 1994 fish kiil. According SRFB Inspector the river has
made a substantial recovery since the 1994 kill, whereas the angling club report
consistently, lower catches since then
The aneling club also believe that the arterial drainaqe schenre which has been onqoins for over a decade has resulted in a substantial bui ld up of sediment in the slacker
flow' stretches of'the lou,er reaches This silt has progressively accumulated in the
lou,er reaches (and presumablv in the upper basin of L Gara as u,el l) as the drainage
operation proqressed steadil l up the channel toward the upper reaches This
conrbined u,ith hear.f' u'eed grou'lh are thought to be adversell, affecting the fishen,
The Lunq is inrportant not just in i tself as a f ishen, but also as a site for spa*'nins for
coarse f ish from the lake All species move up the river to spa\\/n. althouqh. in recenl
vears there is a su_qgestion that bream are unable to successfiJl lv cross the rveir. iust
downstream of Banada Bridqe so that they cannot spa\\,n further upstream from this
point (pers conrm Jinr Coean. B&DAC)
Lorrgh Gara
The Lunq f lorvs into the northern basin of Lough Gara and clearly has implications for
the quali tv of that lake L Gara is a complex lake. having tu,o nrain basins: a northern
one in Co. Sligo, and a southern one in Co Roscomnron. The t 'uvo main inf lou'r ivers
are the Lung and the Brideog, both f lou,inq to the northern basin. al l or a port ion of
r.r,hich is known as Lough Callou'. The lake is drained b),the River Boyle f lou' ins ou1
of the north eastern corner \\ /ater fronr the lake is abstracted for public supplv bt
Roscommon County Counci l
I4 9
lAttachment 14
it is now dominated by coarse fish. panicularly in the lower reaches. even though trout
are occasionally caught in the middle and upper reaches. The main species present are
bream. pike rudd. roach and eel. The river is fished by the Ballaghaderreen & District
Angling Club (B&DAC) with a membership of 70 and an active core of about 20-30
anglers. Competitions are held on a roughly monthly basis both on the Lung and on
Lough Gara.
The river is also fished by visiting British anglers, especially in the months of April and
May before the level in the river drops (pers. comm. Mr. Malt Nolan. Fisheries
Inspector. Shannon Regional Fisheries Board. SRFB) According to a club
spokesman, visi.ting anglers staying in local accommodalion numbered several hundred
in the early 1990's and while substantial numbers still come. there has been a
pronounced decline since the 1994 (ish kill. According SRFB Inspector the river has
made a substantial recovery since the 1994 kill. whereas the angling club repon
consistently lower catches since then
The angling club also believe thaI the anerial drainage scheme which has been 011
going for over (I decade has resulted in a subst3IHiai build up of sedimenl in the slader
now stretches of the lower reaches This sill has progressive)\' accumulated in the
lower reaches (and presurn2bk in the upper basin of L. Gara as well) as the drainage
operation progres~ed steadily up the channel toward the upper reaches. This
combined with hca\y weed gro\\1h ,lie thought 10 be adversely afTccting the fisher:--:
The Lung is imronant flOl JUSl in ilself as a fishery bUI also as a site for spawning for
coarse fish from the I,\!-;e All specIes move up the river 10 spawn. llithough. In recent
years there IS a suggestion that bream are unable 10 successfull~; cross the weir juS!
downstream of Banada Bridge so that they cannOI spawn further upstream from Ihis
point (pers comm Jim Cogan. B8.:DAC)
Lough G;H·~
The Lung flows illlo the northern basin o( Lough Gara and c1carl~ has implications for
Ihe qualil\' of thaI lake L Gara is a complex laKe, having. IwO main basins: a northern
one in Co. Sligo, and a soulhern Olle in Co. Roscommon. The t\Vo main innov-; rivers
are the Lung and Ihe Brideog, both flowing 10 (he northern basin. all or a pOflion of
which is I\no\\'n C.S LOlluh C~I'o\V. The la"e is drained by Ihe RIver Bovle f1owiJl!.'. Olll- • 0' ~
of the nonh eastern corner. Waler from the lake is abstr~c\ed for public supply by
Roscommon Count\, Council
49
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
Lough Gara is a very shallow lake and has a very heavy weed growth. According to a
recent survey (Dr. Kenneth lrvine, TCD) the southern basin contains extensive
growths of submerged macrophytes (aquatic plants) dominated by Water-milfoil
(My'iophyllun) and Pondweeds (Potamogeton spp.) with emergent Common Club-
rush (Scfioerrcplectus lacustris) and extensive floating beds of Yellow Water lily
(Nuphar lutea). The northern bed has not been extensivell, surveyed for macrophytes
but @ntains (at least) exlensive growths of a fine leaved Pondweed either P..filiformis
or P. pectincttus.. Strile both the latter species maJ' occur in nutrient enriched \ /aters.
the latter species is more or less characteristic of such habitats.
The water quality of Lough Gara was first extensi',,g11;5unrsyed in 1974bv An Foras
Forbartha (Flanaean & Toner 1975) when physico/chemical and biological
characteristics were sun,eyed once in Februarv and once in April at several sites in
both basins of the lake. Table 5a.qives a summan/ of some of the kev results obtained
Table 5a Water analt,sisresults (part of) from a 1974 sun,e), of Lough Gara
(Flanaean & T 197_5d l l ( n oner
l9i 4 Cond . pIl Co lou r Secch i Tota l -P Ni t ra te Chloropht ' l l a
uS cntg 25
o(r
Pt Co( l t t i t s
t71 N ' Q t. P mg l ,N lg l
Feb'14i 0-5 I7 -8 1 70 l0 -20 0 052
01170 l17 -0 t 8 l
08 - t 4
-lul '74 370 77 -S t 50 I 0 - l - i 0 055 -01 l t
T 36 -44
Tab le 5b \ l /ater Anah,sis results (part of) f ronr a recelt l sun/ey of Louqh Garacarr ied out bv the Environmental Sciences l- . tni t of TCD and kindlv
ovided bv Dr Ken In, ine. Proiect Director1996 C o n d . p l I Co lou r Secc h i To ta l -P N i t ra te C h l o r o
n h v l l apS cnt, Q . : ) |
Pr (-o
Ilttit.rl r l 1 1 l ( , I P , 1 1 0 pg l
NorthBas in
340-377 8 28 -839
_s0-84 0 8 - r 7 0 0210 0 i 8
0 0 r60 96r
29 -'I
_i
SouthBasin
i04-3 70 79 -88 47 -201 0 9 - l 0 0 0260 029
T r9-35
l2 sarnplc runs ( inc l { for n i t ratc and 6 for Tot-P) nere rnadc in thc nor th basin ( l1 th Apr. - l1 Sept9 srntp les runs ( inc l . I for n i t ratc and 2 for Tot-P) r lcrc rnadc in l l rc south basin ( l l t l r Ju l - l9 Oct)
Accord ing to F lanagan and l -oner ( 1975) . the lake \ \ ,as n resot roph ic . a cond i t ion rvh ich
had no t chanqed over the prev ious 20 \ ,ears Thev base th is assessn len t on a
Attachment 14
I? sample runs (inc!. ~ for rlllr<lIC ;lIld 6 fOJ TOI-P) wcre made in Ihe Ilonh basill (1~lll Apr, - 1-1 ScpU<) s..1lllplcs runs tinc!. I for nilr~\c :ll\d :2 for TOl·PI were llIade ill tile soulll b:lsin (1'111 Jul· 1<; OCll
Water analysis results (pan of) from II 1974 survey of Lough Gara
(Flana!..'.an &. TOller )97::")
Water Anal~'~is results (pan of) from a recent surve\ or Lough Garacarried out b~' the Environmental Sciences Unit or Teo and kindly
·d db D K} P D
Lough Gara is a very shallow lake and has a very' heavy weed growth. According to a
recent survey (Dr. Kenneth Irvine, TCD) the southem basin contains extensive
growths of submerged macrophytes (aquatic plants) dominated by Water-milloil
(Myriophyllum) and Pondweeds (Potamoge/on spp.) with emergent Common Club
rush (Schocnoplectlls /acJtstris) and eXlensive floating beds of Yellow Water lily
(Nuphar lutea). The nOl1hem bed has not been extensively surveyed lor macrophytes
bUl contains (at least) eX1ensive growths of a fine leaved Pondweed either P. fi/[formis
or P. pectinatllL \Vh.ile both the latter species may occur in nutrient enriched waters.
the latter species is more or less characteristic of such habitats
The water quality of Lough Gara was first e>.1ensively surveyed in 1974 by A11 Foras
Forbartha (Flanagan & Toner 1975) when physico/chemical and biological
characteristics were surveyed once in February and once in April at several sites ill
both basins of the lake. Table Sa gives a summary of some of the key resuhs obtained:
Table Sa
Table Sb
According !O Flanagan and Toner ( 1975 l. the lake was mcsolrophic. a condition \vhich
had nOI chi'>nged over the rreviolls 20 ,'cars The,· b(l~e lhi~ aS~CSSnleJ1t on a
-1974 I Condo pH Colour Sc(chi Tot;d-P J\' i t r::l fe ChIaro -
nhyll n
,uS em I>t to 111 111l:! 'l. P I11g I. N pg Iii ]5 l in;ts-
DCFeb ·74 :>0:- 7 7-S, j 70 1.0-2 0 ( .O~2- o 117 - o8 - 1.4
0.117 O.ISI
1
50--
.lui '74 370 7 7-S I 1.0-1 ,::- 0.055- T ~ 6 - 4 4
L I 0.111
proVI e \" f. en rv·lne. relCCI lfcctor1996 Condo pH COJOtll- Srcchi TOI:lI-P Nilnlle Chloro -
nh\'l1 {/
liS em IJ} Co J]} /JIg I. P IJJ~ I. lv' P[! /·i,. ]j (' /...InJ!s
Nonh 340-377 8.28- 50-84 O.S-] 7 0.012 - 0016 - 2.9 -
Basin 8.39 0.038 0,961 15South 304-370 7.9 - 8.8 47-201 0.9-1.0 0026 - T 1.9 - 3.5Basin 0.029
50
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:11
Attachment 14
combination of the chemistry and the phytoplanklon community, which was diverse
and dominated by diatoms, and reference to surveys carried out in the 1950's. The1,
also suggest that the total-P levels are consistent with such a designation. However.
these would be considered higher than one would expect in a mesotrophic lake
(OECD 1982). The 1996 results (Table 5b) are also broadly consistent with a
mesotrophic status with the exception of Secchi Disc transparency which at 0.8-1.7 m
is characteristic of eutrophic waters. The obvious reason for this apparent discrepancl,
is the high colour of the lake u,hich would naturallv reduce transparenci,, quite apart
from phytoplankton growh (measured as chlorophl,ll a) which was not particularll '
h igh in 1996
One might have expected that because of the relarively elevated phosphate levels
associated with the Lunq inflou,. that at least the southern basin of L. Gara would be
eutrophic or even hypertrophic The fact that this has not been noted may relate to the
VeD, dense gro\^rths of macrophl4es present througlrout the lake, especial lY the
southern basin. These mav u,el l be rapidlv moppin,r up nutr ients, rvhich mav erpla'n
u,h1r dul ino julv both in 1914 and 1996 there rvas vir tual lv no ni trate measured in
waler samples at some si tes on the lake The lat ter l laY also suggest that at such t intes
the lake is ni t rate rather than phosphate l imit ing i e that the low levels of ni t rate are
control i ing addit ional pl t . t ' to l t larrHoir grou.th The fact that the water is ven, shal lou
It1&\t qi l rs a competi t ive advantage to the rooted vegetat ion over phr, toplankton.
prevent inq the lat ter f rom developine to bloom ievels The high colour mav also be
panial lv suppressine phyoplankton development due ro arrenuat ion of l ight
The fact that the lake is so hear, i l r , * ,eeded makes i t ven' di f f icul t to travel about in a
boat . par t i cu la r l t ' i n the southern bas in . dur in { r . the sunrmer months (a fac t a lso
ren tarked on in F lanaqan & - i -oner
1975) Th is n rakes f i sh ing a t cer ta in t in res o f the
vear a l l bu t imposs ib le in much o f the lake L ike the Lung R iver . the lake is a coarse
f is l tet l dont ir tated b1' pike. l r reanr. roaclr and rudd l-he shal lowness of the Iake has
been eracerbated b) ' the dra i r rase o f the R iver Bov le a t the lakes ou t le t I f the lake 's
out le t to the Bo1,1g \ /e re cont ro l led b1 , a s lu ice r . r , i t l r a c res l he iqh t o f about ln t . the
anr: l ing club and the SRIrB bel ieve that access bl , anglers u,ould be great l l , intproved
Horvever . th is change rvou ld a lso have to be cons idered in the I iqh t o f po tenr ia l
chanses to the phr . top lank ton-n tacrophv te ba lance in the lake
l
IAttachment 14
combination of the chemistry and the phy1oplanklon community. which was diverse
and dominated by diawms. and reference to surveys carried oul in the 1950's They
also suggest that the total-P levels are consistent with such a designation. However,
these would be considered higher than one would expect in a mesotrophic lake
(OEeD 1992). The 1996 results (Table 5b) are also broadly consistent with a
mesotrophic status with the exception of Secchi Disc transparency which at O.g-I. 7 m
is characteristic of eutrophic waters. The obvious reason for this apparent discrepancy
is the high colour of the lake which would naturally reduce transparency, quile apan
from phytoplanbon growth (measured as chlorophyll a) which was not panicularly
hiQh in 1996.
One might have expected thai because of the relatively elevated phosphcl1 e levels
associated with the Lung inflow. that at least the SOLithern basin ofL Gara would be
eutrophic or even hypertrophic The fact that this has not been noted may relate to lhe
vcry dense gro"'1hs of macroplWles present throughoul the lal-:e. especially the
soulhem basin. These may well be rapidly mopping lip nutrients, which may explain
why dunng July both in 1974 and 1996 I here \Vi1S vinuallv no nitrate measured in
water samples at some siles 01\ lhe la~e The laller mil:-: also suggest that <11 such 11111C5
the lake is nitrate rather than phosphale limiting i c that the low levels of nitrale arc
cOnlroliing additional ph.l'fOjJ/OllkfOIl growth. The felel that the water is very shallo\\
lllay give a competitive ad,·alltage lothe rooled vegetat ion over phytorlank:lon
preventing the latler from devcl ping 10 bloom ievels The high colour may also be
panially suppressing phylOplanklon developmenl due 10 atlenualion of light
The facl thaI the lake is so he;l\·ih- weeded makes ii \·crv difficull 10 travel about in a. .
boat. panicularl.\' in lhe south TIl basin. durin!..! lhe summer months (", fact also
rCnlar~ed en in Flanagan 8:. TOiler 197:') This nl(ll-:cs fishing at cenain limes of (he
\lear all but impossible in much of the lal-;e Like lhe Lun~ River. the lake is a coarse. -fishery donllnalcd by pike. bn:llJl1. roach and nldd The shallowness or the la)..;e has
been CX3ccrba Ied by the drai Ilag.e- of Ihe Ri ver 13()~'le at [he 13 ~ es outlet If (he la J,; C'$
OUIlel (0 lile Bovle were controlled by a sluice Wilh a cresl height of about I m. I he
angling club and Ihe SRFB hcliC\·c Ihat access by anglers v,/(luld be great 1:--' improved
Howcver. this change would iJlso have 10 be collsidcrcd in Ihe light or pOlenlial
changes 10 (he pll\'10planklon-nlacroph~,tc balance in the lal-:e
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
Irr igat ion Lands
G e tte ra I De scri p t i cttr
The Irrigation lands receive on averaqe 230 m3/day of sludge containing 2300kg of
soiids. Under the proposed plan the daily hvdraulic load will be reduced by about 7591,
to 60m-'/d, whereas the solids u,ill only drop by about 3o/o to L25Okglday (see Section
2 Descriprion of Proccss). ln addition on about two da1's per month. high solids
(100mg/l) secondary effluent is discharged through the fail-safe system directly to the
irrigation area. Although they haven't been measured, the sludge solids are likely to be
rich in phosphorus This is confirmed bv the verv elevated P levels in the soil of the
irrigation area (see section on Sbi/.s;
ln the past the irrigation area was netrvorked u,ith drains which discharged during wet
u'eather directly to the fur,er Lunq. Furthermore, during u,inter the entire irrigation
area was l iable to inundation by'the r iver Clearl l ' . both these factors meant that the
escapmenr of phosphorus enriched par"ticulates and run-offto the river was inevitable
In an effort to recti f i ' this situation. al l the land drains in the irr igation area u,ere f i l led
in and their outlets to the river were blocked off Furthermore, to prevent additional
losses associated u' i th inundation bv the River Lung in winter and to promote
settlement rvithin the irriqarion area. an embankment or stank was constructed around
most of irs outer perimeter The latter resulted in the formation of a ponded or
lagooned area u'hose level is controlled bt' the height of the enrbankment and the
presence of 4 overf lou'pipes in the latter .A further embankment divides the irr igation
area internall l , . creating an addit ional sett lenrent area u,i thin the irr igation area
affording the possibi l i tv of further phosphorus attenuaiion u' i thin the area. Bevond the
outer embankntenl a deep drain runs paral lel to the r iver and receives al l the overf lou'
irr igation area This drain . ioins the Lung at the south eastern corner of the irr igation
area arrd acrs as a convenient common sarnpling point for t l te conrbined discharge front
the svstem The above is described in detai l in the fol lou,ing l4'atcr Ragnre section.
prepared br, N4escal & Associates
Attachment 14
Irrigation Lands
Genera! DcscnplJOll
The Irrigation lands receive on average 230 m3/day of sludge containing 2300kg of
solids. Under the proposed plan the daily h~'draulic load will be reduced by about 75%
to 60m'/d. whereas the solids will only drop by about 3% to 2150kg/day (see Section
2 Descrip'ioJJ of Process), In addition on about two days per month, high solids
(J OOmgll) secondary effluent is discharged through the fail-safe system directly to the
irrigation area. Although they haven't been measured, the sludge solids are likely to be
rich in phosphorus. This is confirmed by the very elevated P levels in the soil of the
irrigation area (see section on -"'oils).
III the past the irrigation area was networked with drains which discharged during wet
weather directly 10 the River Lung. Furthemlore, during winter the entire irrigation
area \vas hable 10 inundation by the river Clead\'. bOlh these factors meant that the
escapmem or phosphorus enriched panlcLdalc~ and run-off to the river was inevitable.
111 an effon to reclify this situation. all Ihe land drains in the irrigalion area were filled
in and their outlets to the river were bloded ofT Funhermore. to prevenl additional
losses aSs0clated ",:ilh inundation b\' the River Lung in winter and 10 promOTe
seulemenl within the irrigation area. an elllbanl.:ment or stanl-: was constructed around
most of ilS outer perimeler The lauer resulted In the ronnation or a ponded or
la!looned area whose level is controlled b~' the heighr of Ihe embanKment and the
presence or..:1 overflow pipes in the laller .-\ flirt her embanKment divides the irrigation
area inl emalh', creating an additional seltlemenl area wilhin the irrigation area
affording t he possibility or nmher phosphonls 311ellualion wit hin the area. Beyond the
outer embankmenl a deep drain runs parallel [0 the river and receives all Ihe overtlo\~
Illlgatlon area This drain joins (he Lung al (he soulh e<lSlcrn comer or the irrigiuion
uca and octs as a convenient comlllon sampling poinl for the combined discharge from
the s~'stem The above is described in delilil in the rollowing WalL'1 He.f!llJJL' section.
prepared b\' Me~cal & Associates
52
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
Water Resirne
Irttroduction
The 16.5 ha. of irrigation lands at Shannonside Co-Op receive narural inflow of waterfrom two sources:-
direct rainfall onto lands
runofffrom adjacent landss (See \\/ater Regime Lands).
Water loss occurs in the following wa1's
, evapotranspiration (E-T) from veqetation
evaporation from u,ater surfacesiponds
percolation through ground
direct outflou'via overflow nipe.
The rvater regime is examined for the fol lorvinc periods.
annual averaqe
u,inter season - November to April I
surrrmer season - Mav to October
ln addit ion. the lower Lung catchment. includine the lrr iqation Lands at Shannonside.are prone to f looding during periods of hear.r,rainfal l in u' inler The banks around theperimeter of the lands effectiyglv prevenl this fiom happeninq The flood level rose towithin i00mm of the crest of the bank on one occasion in 1995. bur did not overtop ir.The f lou'paths taken b\ ' \ \ 'ater on the Irr ieation Lands are shou,n in Warer ReqimeFlou/pathS
I ttflrnt
The 30 )/ear annual average rainfal l at Ballaehaderreen is I l- i9mm. comprisinu6l6mm in winter and 54i in sumnrer (Ref Rainfal l f igures from the MeteoroloqicalServ' ice). This contributes directl l , 1o the 16.5 ha. of lrr iqarion Lands. The landscontributing runoffto the Shannonside landd are sho,rvn on \\/ater Re,rinre Lands. Thelotal area involved is l0 7 ha
.Annuall l ' . about 50% of rainfal l runs off the land in Ireland as a u'hole This f igure istaken as being representat ive of the lands in quest ion The remainder of the ra in fa l l is
Attachment 14
Water ReQime
introduction
The '6.5 ha. of irrigation lands at Shannonside Co-Op receive natural inflow of water
ITom twO sources:-
direct rainfall onto lands
runofflTom adjacent landss (See Waler Regime Lands).
Water loss occurs in the following ways:
evapotranspiration (E-T) from vegetation
evaporation from water surfacesiponds
percolation through ground
direct outflow via overflow pipe
The waler regime is examined for lhe following periods:
annual avera!!.e
winter season - November (0 April
summer season - Ma" to October
In addition. the lower Lung catchment. including lhe IrrigalJon Lands at Shannonside.
are prone 10 flooding during peflods of heaV\' rainfall in winter The banks around the
perimeler of the lands effec(ivel~' prevent thiS from happening. The nood level rose 10
within ~OOmm oflhe crest of the ban\.: on one occasion in 1995. but did no! ovenop it.
The Oowpaths laken b~' \\'3ler on lhe Irrigalion Lands are shown in Water Regime
rlowpaths
J/I (lOll
The 30 year' annual average rainfall al Ballaghaderreen is ) I 59mnl. comprising
616mnl in wintcr and S4~ in summer. (Ref. Rainfall ligures from the Meteorological
Serv'ice). This contributcs directly \0 the 16,5 ha, of IrTigation Lands. The lands
contributing flJnofflO lhe Shannonside landd arc shown on Water Regime Lands The
IOlal area involved is 10,7 ha
Annually. about 50% of r<lillfall fll115 off the land in Ireland as a whole. This figure is
ta\.:cn as being rcpresentoli v c of the lands In qlle~lion The rCflloinder of the rainfall is
53
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
lost through E-T and percnlation tolosses are taken as 42Yo annuallr,. and
- Et,apo-l rat t -rp i ra t i ctt t
Fol lou, ing the same methodologr as above.
fainfal l onto the l2 4 ha of ve.,etar ion is lost
The f igure is spl i t 79 21 betrveen sunrnter and
Attachment 14
ground. For the lands contributing runofl E_Tpercolation as 8ot'o iRef, J. Mulqueen, Teagasc).
r t rs assunted that 42ot i of direct annual
to the atmosphere and to plant grou.rh
u, i l t ter
In order to estimate the variation in runoff with the seasons, it is necessary to dividethee E-T and percolation losses into summer and winter components. E-T andpercolation rates vary with the season. E-T increases in summer, while percolation-eenerally falls. The reverse happens in winter. Field studies by Teasasc at a similarlocation in North Connaught have shourn that 799a of total annual E-T occursbetween
April and October (J. Mulqueen, Teagasc). For percolation it is assumed that 70g,o ofthe total annual percolation quantitv is lost durine the rvinter months. These figuresallow total annual runoff to be divided into seasonal components. A summary ofinf lon'results is presented in lnf lou,to Irr iqation Lands.
Otttflov
Water loss occurs from the l6 5 ha of lrr igation Lands in the wavs l isted above. Thelrr i . 'at ion Lands comrjse l2 4 ha of veqetation and 4.1 |,ra of shallo*, ponds. E_Tlosses occur from the vegetatr ion. u,hi le er. 'aporation occurs from the ponds
- l:t,altoratiott
Class 'A Pan evaporat ion f igures for the Bal laqhaderreen area are attached Acorrect ion factor of 0.7 is usual l l ' appl ied to Class A Pan results. to more accurateh.est imate f ie ld condit ions in l reland (Ref. L N4. McCumisket, . " \ \ /ater in l reland").Th is e ivess a to ta l o f 440ntm o f evapora t ion per annunr . sp l i r 75 :25 be t rveen summerand w in te r . over the 4 .1 ha o f ponds a t Shannons ide
- Pcrcolatirtr
The lands are underlain bl peat. u 'hich permits some percolat ion of sur lace \ \ .ater onrothe qround A smal l por t ion o f th is perco la t ion cont r ibu tes ro g roundu,a ter recharqeThe quat i tY involved is considered neql igible impernreable nature of t l re underl ' ingc lav The remain inq perco la t ion f lou 's para l le l to the peat /c la r in te r face . enrerg ins in ro
< ^
Attachment 14
lost through E-T and percolation 10 ground For the lands contributing runoff, £-T
losses are taken as 42% annually, and percolation as 8% :Ref. J. Mulqueen, Teagasc).
In order to estimate the variation in runoff with the seasons, it is necessary to divide
thee E-T and percolation losses into summer and winter components. E-T and
percolation rates vary with the season. E-T increases in summer. while percolation
generally falls. The reverse happens in winter. Field studies by Teagasc at a similar
location in North Connaught have shown that 79% of total annual E-T occurs
between
April and OctO.ber (1, Mulqueen. Teagasc) For percolation it is assumed Ihat 70% of
the IOtaI annual percolation quantit.v i~ lost during the winter months. These fih'l.lreS
allow totaJ annual runoff to be divided into seasonal components. A summary of
inflow results is presented in Inflow to Irrigation Lands.
Water loss occurs from the 16:) Ila of Irrigation Lands in the ways listed above. The
Jrrig':\Iion Lands comt ise 1~ ~ ha of vegetation and 4 J ha of shallow ponds. E-T
losses occur from the vegetanion. while evaporation occurs from Ihe ponds
- £"o/)()-lroll.I/)IJ'mio/l
Following the same methodology ?s tlbove. il is (lssLlll1ed thaI 42% of direct annual
fainfall onto the 12.4 ha of vegetation is lost 10 the <lllllOSpherc and 10 plant !.!rO\\'lh
The figure is splil 79.2' bcw,'ecn SUrlll11Cr and \l"intcr
- E\,(~lP()I'{l1l ()} I
Class A Pan evaporalion figures for the BallauhadefTeen area are attached A
correction factor of 0.7 is usually applied 10 (I(lss A Pan results. 10 more i\ccuratck
eSlimate field' conditions in Ireland (Ref L.M McCumisl.:ey. "WaleI' in Ireland"'),
This givess a 100ai of 4'10mm of evaporation per annum. splil 7~2) between summer
and ,!,.'inler. over Ihe 4 I ha. of ponds al ShannOllside
- h"'I'co/milJlI
The lands. are underlain b" pcm. which permils somc pClcolalion of sUlface "'iller onlo
the ground, A small ponion of Ihis percol;lIion contribules to groundwater recharge
The Cjuariry involved is considered negligible impermeable nalllre of the underlYing
cl? \ The rcmal ni ng percol;n ion flo\\'_ para llel lot he PCClt icl2\' iIlt crfnce. elncrgll1~ in10
54 I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
the field drain and the eastern stream. The peat is l.5m deep on average. from trial
hole data. The peat layer has a boundary length at the drain and stream of 600m
approx. The totat cross-sectional area of flow A is therefore 900m2. The permeability
k is estimated at 5.0 x l0-5m/s which is a reDresentative value for shallow
unconsolidated peat.
The average hydraulic gradient i is estimated at 0.01, assuming the hydraulic srade
line lies at the top of the peat layer. This is based on the lie of the land. the water
levels on the land. and the wetness conditions. Total flow is therefore
Q: kAi :14200 mt/annum approx.
This flou' is assumed to be spread evenly throughout the year. due to the saturated
condition of the peat. and the relatively stable hvdraulic conditions on the lands. This
Iou'percolation flow is consistent u,ith field observ'ations on site throuqhout the vear
- Direct Discharge
The remainder of the total inf low discharee via an overf lou'pipe to the f ield drain. As
shown by the attachments- the irrigation lands are divided by a bank S/ater enterintl
the upper section percolates throueh the bank and the peat\/ ground to contribute to
surface water in the lower section A portion also overfiou,s to the lower section
through an overflow pipe Ultimately this water discharges bv one of the routes
described above.
A summary of outflorv fiqures is presented in Outflou,from lrri-qation Lands
Cortclusiorr
The annual rainfal l and runoff water entering the Shannonside lrr ieation Lands totals
253.241m'' approx. Of this abaout 160.600m: discharges via an overf lorv pipe to the
adjacent f ield drain. l t is estimated that 719" of this dischar.qe occurs durine the winter
period.
q 5
Attachment 14
the field drain and the eastern stream. The peat is J .5m deep on average, from trial
hole data. The peat layer has a boundary length at the drain and Slream of 60001
appro>:. The total cross-sectional area of flow A is therefore 900m 2. The permeability
k is estimated at 5.0 x ]0"5mJS which is a representative value for shallow
unconsolidated peat.
The average hydraulic gradient i is estimated at 0 0 I, assumi ng the hydraulic grad e
line lies at the top of the peat layer. This is based on the lie of the land. the water
levels on the land, and the wetness conditions. TOlal flow is therefore
Q ::= l..:Ai == 14200 m~/annum appro>.:.
This flow is assumed to be spread evenly throughout the year. due to the saturated
condition of the peat and the relatively stable hydraulic conditions on the lands. This
low percolation {low is consistent with field observ'ation~ on site throughoul the year,
- Direct Disc!Jol"f!{'
The. remainder of the tOlal innow discharge via an o\,erf)o\v plpC to the field drain. :\5
shown by the attachments. the irrigation lands are divided by a bank \Vater enterin~~
Ihe upper section percolates through the ban~ and the peaty ground to contribute to
surface wa1er in the lower section A pon.ion also overflows to the lower section
through an overflow pipe Ultimately this \vater discharges bv onc of the routcs
described above.
A summary of Qulllo\.... fIgures IS presented in Outflow from lrrigalion Lands
('ollcluSIO})
The annual rainfall and runoA" water enlering the Shannonside Irrigation Lands lotal~
153.24) 01': 'lIJprox. Of Ihls abaoul 160.600rn: dischuges v\a an oved)o\~' pipe (0 the
adjacent field drain. ]( is estimated lhat 77% oflhis discharge occurs during Ihe winter
period
55
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
Water Oualiry,
Water analysis results from the present study carried out on October 20th (Sites 53 &
54, Table 6) indicate that the overflow from the inigation area is rich in phosphorus
and ammonia and very high in chlorophyll. The latter presumably builds up during the
summer in the ponded area due to run-off of nutrients from the irrigated sludge. The
latter also accounts for the relatively high BOD values measured at 53 the overflou'
from the lagoon and at 54 the outlet drain to the fuver Lung. This BOD was derived
in all probabilitl, fvsm the high phgoplankton respiration rather than the presence or
organic waste per se. High conductivity is consistent with elevated chloride.
potassium and sodium in the laqoon waters.
Phosphonrs Loads
The phvsical alterations to the irr iqation area outl ined above were f irst introduced in
late I99,i and since then some l imited monitorinq of the outfal l from the lagooned area
has been carried out b) ' Rosconron Countl ' Council and the Shannon Regional
Fisheries Board The data from these analvses were combined n,ith one further set of
results produced for the present EIS to estimate the average total phosphorus
concentratiorrs from the irrigation area. The latter were then used r.r,ith flow' data from
the hydroloqv nrodel. also produced 1'or this EIS. in order to estimate the average dail l
total-P load from the irr ieation area This estimation the assumption that total P from
the irrigation area is about twice the concentration of MRP (Molvbdate Reactive
Phosphorus) or solube phosphorus This n'as based on the MRP Total-P ratios of?:l obsen,ed in the present sampling run in overf lor.v water from the laqoon area (see
53 & 54 . Tab le 6 )
Table 1 Phosphate (N{RP) anah,sis results on the overf lou' front the Irr iqat ionA T E A
Conc. of l \{RP (mgn. P) Date So u rce
I6r 0l-04- r e96 RCC
t0 i I 8-06- r 996 RCC. A: 1 I 0-09- r 996 SRFB, - /a+ ?0 - r0 - r996 ASU (EIS)
The mean N4RP concentration denved l 'ronr Table 7 is 2 32 mr/l-
trshSest in ra ted a \ /e raqe to ta l -P concent ra t ion o f 4 64 n t i l l . P .
discharqe volunre of 688 8 mi/dar ' for the period November to
mi/dar ' for N4av to October the fol iou' in.s a\/erage daih, loads can be
P u,hich gives an
the averaqe dai l r '
Apr i l and I 94 .3 5
calculated for the
5 6
Attachment 14
Water Qua/if)'
Water analysis results from the present study carried out on October 20th (Sites 53 &
S4, Table 6) indicate that the overflow from the inigation area is rich in phosphorus
and ammonia and very high in chlorophyll. The latter presumably builds up during the
summer in the ponded area due to run-off of nutrients from the irrigated sludge. The
laner also accounts for the relatively high BOD values measured at 53 the overflow
from the lagoon and at S4 the outlc! drain to the River Lung. This BOD was derived
in aJI probability from the high phylOplanklOn respiration rather than the presence or
organic waste per se. High conductivity is consistent with elevated chloride.
potassium and sodium in the lagoon waters.
Phosphorl/s Loads
Cone. of J\1RP (lllgll. P) Date Source-
3.61 0:>-04-1996 RCC
I 03 18-06-1996 RCC
2.4 10-09-1996 5RfB
2.24 20-10-1996 ASU (EIS)
The ph\'sical allerations to the irrigation area outlined above were firsl introduced in
late 1995 and since then some limited moniloring of the outfall from the lagooned area
has been carried out by Roscomon (ounty Council and the Shannon Regional
Fisheries Board The data from these an(\I\'~es were combined with one further set of
resulls produced for Ihe prescnl EIS 10 estimate the average IOtal phosphorus
conceOlrations from the irrigation area The latter were then Llsed Willi now data frOIl)
the hydrolog\' modcl. also produced fOf thi!> £15. in order to estimate the average daily
(Qtal-P load froll1 the irrigation arca. This estimation the assumption Ihat total P from
the irrigation area is about twice I he concentration of MRP (Molvbdate Reacllve
Phosphor1.l5) or soiube phosphorus ThIS ,,?s based on the MRP TOlal-P ratios of
:.) observed in the rresenl silmplin~ run in ovcr(loH' waler frOI11 (he lagoon area (sec
53 8:. 54. Table 6)
Table 7 Phosphate (tvtRP) allal\'sis rcsulls on lhe overllmv from the In'igalionarea
The mean MRY concentrarion deri\'cd frorn Tl\ble 7 is 2.32 mglL P which gives al\
cSllmaleo Clvera'..!.e to1t~I-P CClnccntr3lioJ) of <1 64 IllvL P Usin!2. the ilVerau.e dail.\- \ ,- -
discharge \'olu me of 6SB S III j/da\ fOf the period No\'cmber 10 :'\ prj) and J 94 .~:'
m:>/da:-' for 1\1;1:-. \0 October the foil wIng (lverage d<lil\' It, d. <l!l be cillculated for rile
56
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
same intervals 3.2 kg P /day (Nov-Apr) and 0.9 kg P /day. This gives an annual
average daily load of 2.05 kgP/day.
To put these figures into perspective it is necessary to compare them with the loads
estimated from other sources within the catchment i.e. including Shannonside ETP.
Ballaghaderreen STP. other industrial point sources and diffirse sources i.e.
background catchment sources and aqriculture.
Shannonside total-P load comprises direct a discharge from the ETP at a rate of
2000m3/day and an averaqe TP conc. of 8.5 mgn, P * (n:q), the cooling water
discharge to the'west drain'7,500 m3/day with a concentration of 0.36 m_q/I. P (n:3)
and contaminated surlace run-off to the 'east drain' with a flow of 240m3/day and
concentration of 0.402 mgn, P (n:5) These data sive a combined averaqe daily total-
P load from Shannonside of 22 26 kg/day making the assumption that MRP Total P
ra t i o i s 1 .1 .3 .
The factory f lou's, cool ing water f lou's and discharqes used in the above calculat ions is
from a Mescal & Associates sun/ev The concentrat ion data u'ere taken I lonr
Roscommon Countv Counci l data for 1996 and Shannon Reqional Fisheries Board
data for the same period
The average dail1, total P load fionr the Ballaqhaderreen STP was estimated at i
kg/dat ' bv the EPA based on a dai l1, per capita P contr ibut ion of i q The EPA also
est intated contr ibut ions from other industr ies in the area as less than 0 5 kg P/day
The same report calculated the averaqe background P contr ibut ion as approximatel l
7 5 ksy 'dar , (a t F loa t Br idge) and fo r agr icu l tu re as rang ing f ron t < 0 .5 kg /da i ,dur ine
drl , months to 58 kg/da1'during rvet nronths also nreasured at Float Br idee. When al l
of these other sources of P load are considered, averaqe dai lv total P loads could range
lront about 35kg/day durinq dr ier nronths to as nruch as l0-5 1iq76.t 'dur inq wet
periods \ \ /hi le al l of these lat ter data area based nrainl l , on a sinqle intensive sampl in: t
per iod between Septenrber 1994 to October 1994 and on internr i t tent lonq term
monitor ing data and are thus somervhat t imited. the1, sen,e nevertheless to put the
est intated total-P load from the irr iqat ion area into perspect ive. In this reqard. the data
u,ould suggest that on a\/erage, the nraximum contr ibut ion o1' the lat ter to the overal l
total-P load rvould be benveen 2 5 16 and 3 o/o of the River Lunq load
' n = t l rc nurnbcr of srnrp l ine mns nrakinq up thc rncrr r
Attachment 14
same intervals 3.2 kg P Iday (Nov-Apr) and 0.9 kg P Iday. This gives an annual
average daily load of 2.05 kg P/day.
To put these figures into perspective it is necessary to compare them with the loads
estimated from other sources within the catchment ie including Shannonside ETP,
Ballaghaderreen STP, other industrial point sources and diffuse sources i.e.
background catchment sources and agriculture.
Shannonside total-P load comprises direct a discharg.e from the ETP at a rate of
2000m3/day and an average TP conc. of 8.5 mgll. P * (n==4), the cooling water
discharge to the 'west drain' 7,500 m3/day with a concentration of 036 mgll, P (n=3)
and contaminated surface run-off to the 'east drain' with a flow of 240m3/day and
concentration 0[0.402 mgJI, P (n=5). These data give a combined average daily tOlal
r load from Shannonside of 22.26 kg/day making the assumption that MRP : Total P
ratio is I: 1.:2.
The factory Oows. cooling water 00\\'5 and discharges used in the above calculations is
from a Mescal 6:. .Associates survey The concenlration data were taj(en from
Roscommon (ounl)' Council data for 1996 and Shannon Regional FIsheries Board
data for the same period
The average daily total P load from the Ballaghadcrreen STP was estimated at .>
kg/day bv the EPA based on a dailv per capita P contribution of:l g The EPA also
eSllmared contributions from other industries in the area as less thall 0 :; kg P/day
The same reran calcula[ed the average background P c01Hriblllioll as approximarel)
7.5 kgJda\' (at ,.Ioal Bridge) and for agriculture as ranging from < 0.:' kg/day during
dry months (0 5S kgJdCl)' during weI months also measured at floal Bndge. When all
or Ihese other sources of P load are considered, average dadv lotal r loads could range
frolll aboul 35kg/day during drier months to as much as 105 kg/da\' during weI
periods While all of tllese lalter data area oased mainly on a single intensive sampling
peri0d between Seplember 199Lj 10 October 1994 and 011 intermittent long term
monitoring data and are lhus somewhat limited, they serve Ilevenheless [0 put the
estimaled total-P load from the irrigation area into perspeclive. In Ihis regard, the data
would suggest lhal on average. the maximum contribution of the lalter 10 the overall
total-P load would be between 2 ) % and 3 % of the River Lung load
• 1\ = lhe nllmber or ~11lIpliJ1g. nlilS ll\~kill~ 11f) llie IllC;'1l
57 j
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
In their draft report. on total P loading to the fuver Lung between September and
November 1994 (Kilmartin 1995), the EPA also refer to an additional total-P load
(over and above those outlined in the preceding paragraph) referred to as the Internal
Shannonside Load which thev calculate as the difference between the measured total
load at Float Bridge and the measured and estimated loads from all sources upstream.
including the Lung catchment, Shannonside effluent, Ballaghaderreen STP. other
industries and agriculture etc. The precise source of this internal load which was
est imated at an average dai ly TP load of 26,30 and 8l kg P/day in September,
October and November respectively, is not clearll ' defined in the report. However. it
is believed to have consisted mainly of deposited solids which accumulated on the bed
of the river and were re-suspended downstream, especialll ' during high flou,s It ma1,
be pertinent, to note that at the stage this survel, was carried out. the irrieation area
was open. such that sludqe and contaminated run-off from this area could have
contr ibuted to this ' internal loading' . I f th is is indeed the case. then the improvements
recent lv carr ied oul to t i re in- icat ion area would reduce the potent ial for phosphorus
r ich sol ids l iom that source accumulat inq on the bed of the Lunq
I m p a c t
The chanee in use of the i rr igat ion area in i ts str ictest sense i .e the reduct ion in the
hydraul ic loadinu fronr 2l0m3ida1' to 60m3/da1, is unl ikel) , in i tsel f to have an1, affect
on the r iver Hou,ever. the chanqe from an open imrrat ion 51,51sp u,hich drained
direct lv to the r iver to one now which is retained behind an embanknrent is l ikelv to
signif icanth' reduce the input of phosphorus part icular ly in the fornr of organic sol ids
durinq to the River Lunq 1-he inrprovenrent is nrost I ikel t , to be apparent dur inq the
wetter months u'hen i t is ntost l ikel t , that in the past run-off f rom the irr i r rat ion area
took p lace
As there are no est imates of the level of P loading fronr the i rr igat ion area in the past i r
i s d i f f i cu l t to assess to \ \ 'ha t e \ ten t the es t imated load l rom the neu,area is an
inrprovenrent. Horvever. qiven that the relat ive contr ibut ion. is est imated on averaqe
not to erceed 2 5 - 3out ' of the total-P load fronr the Lunq (calculated at Float Br idge).
the i rr iqat ion area load is not expecled to cause signi f icant nreasurable deter iorat ion in
the qua l i t t ' o f the r i ver Over t in te i t i s I i ke l l ' tha t phosphorus r i ch s ludge rv i l l g radua lh
bu i ld -up in the lagoon area u ,h ich mav in tunr s ive r i se to the re lease o f phosphare
f rom these sed iments th r . rs cont r ibu t inq to a q radua l r i se in the P conten l o f the
over f lou \ \ ,a te r Shou ld th is occur . the necess i t ) , to renrove the top la l 'e rs o f sed in ten t
and to spread thenr on nrore e ieva ted dr ie r q round u ' i th in thc i r r iga t ion migh t have to
be cons idered
Iq r
Attachment 14
]0 their draft repon. on total P loading to the River Lung between September and
November) 994 (Kilman in 1995). the EPA also refer to an additional total-P load
(over and above those outlined in the preceding paragraph) referred to as the ]ntemal
Shannonside Load wruch they calculate as the difference between the measured total
load at Float Bridge a.nd the measured and estimated loads from all sources upstream.
including the Lung catchment, Shannonside effluent, Ballaghaderreen STP, other
industries and agriculture elC, The precise source of this internal load which was
estimated at an average daily TP load of 26, 30 and 81 kg P/day in September,
October and November respectively, is not clearly defined in the repon, HO\vever, it
is believed 10 have consisted mainly of deposited solids which accumulated on the bed
of the river and,were re-suspended downstream. especially during high fiows It may
be pel1inent. to note thaI at the stage this survey was camed out. the irrigation area
was open. such thaI sludge and contaminated run-off from this area could have
contributed to this 'inlemal loading' If this is indeed the case, then the improvcments
recentl~' carried Ollt to the inigation area would reduce (he potential for phosphorus
rich solids from that source ClcClIOlulating on the bed oflhe Lung
lmpllc.(
The change in use of the irrigallon area ill its strictest sense i,e. the reduction in the:
hydraulic 10<lding frolll 2~Om~/day to 60m3/day is unlikely in itself to have all\' affect
on the ri .....er However. the change from an open inigalion system which drained
directly to the river 10 one now which is relained behind an embankment is likelv to
significanll\' reduce the inpul of phosphorus panicularly in the form of organic solids
during 10 Ihe River Lung The improvement is most likely 10 be apparenl during the
weller montl1s when II IS most hkel~' lhal in the pasl run-off from the irrigallon area
look place
As (here are 11() eSlimal e.. of !I1C level of P loading (Torn lhe irrigation area in (he pas! il
is difficult 10 assess (0 what estCll! Ihe estimated load frolll the ne\~ areil is an
Improvcmcnl However, given that the relative conlribution, is estimated on average
not to e:-.:ceed 25 - 3% of the total-P load from the Lung (calculated at Float Bridge),
the irrigation area load i~ llOI e,\pecled to cause significant measurable deterioration in
the quality of the river Over time it is likely that phosphorus rich sludge will graduall~
build-up in the lagoon area which may in tum give risc to the release of phosphate
from lhese sediments thus contributing 10 a gradual rise in the P COnlCnl of the
ovemo\\' wat cr, ShOll \d 1IllS OCCti r. l he necessi Iy 10 remove 1he lOP la~"crs of sediment
and to spread (hem on more til'\',:terl drier ground within the irrigallon might have 10
be considc:red
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
-N
Attachment 14
If no change is made to the current irrigation regime, i.e. if 2300m3 of sludge
continues to be pumped to the irrigation fields, it would be expected to have no
additional impact over and above that described above for the proposed regime. This
assessment is based on the fact that there will be very little difference in the total
sludge solids applied to the irrigation area in either regime and that the
hydraulics/hydrologl, of the svstem is qoverned by precipitation rather than the
hydraulic load from the irrigation sprayers.
Recommendat ions
Re-zular re-location of irrisation sprayers within the irrigation areas might help to
immobil ise more sludge in the soil layers of the drier parts of the lagoon thus reducing
the amount of run-off to the lagoon or ponded areas and thence to the river Gven
that there is a possibi l i t l ' of a gradual increase in total P- levels in the overf lou, water
fronr the irr igation area u' i th t ime due to internal loading. reqular nronitorins of both
flou,s and phosphorus levels in the outf lou, \\ 'ater would be adr, ' isable
Referenccs
Clabbl', K J , Lucel' i & N4 L \4cGarrigle 1995 Irtterint Ileport ort tha BrologrcalStrrt,e-\'o.f River Oualtn - I?e.w/t.s.fctr ]991 ltrvcstigaticnr.s. EPA Potterl' ft636Dun Laoiqhre. Co Dubfin
Flanaqan. P J & Toner, P F ( l9l)) . -1 l )rc l int i rrun'Srrn,et 'of l rrsh [ , t tkc.; An Foras
. Forbartha, Dubl i rr l t r l p1r
Flanagan. P I & Larkin. P \'1 (19,o2) Ilrarcr Oualtr.t in IrelatrJ 1967-1990 J'at'r '/u'o
- Rit,ar Oualtt.t, I-)oro E-nvironnrental Research Unit, Dublin 507 pp
Ki lnrart i r r . l - (1995) Dra.[ t l l ivcr I t r t tg l l ;arcr Oualr t . t A4ort i tot ' i t tg l lqtorr (Sqttcmber'-
Alot,cntbcr I 991) I-PA l{egional lnspectorarc. Casrlebar
OECD ( 1982) I)ttroTtlticattott of II 'atcrs, A4cntitorrng As-scs.smatrt tttrd Ccttttrol,
OECD Paris
lr4eteorolo gical Service l{ecords
J. N4ulqueen (1991)Sor/ atr l H_tdratt l ic Aagtccts of t l rc l -ard Appl icat ictrr of
A53' icul tural Sl trrr ics tnd Sorlet l l l /atars Proc E,nv Irr ipacl Conf . Sepr l99l
L N4 N4cCumiskev I ' [ 'arer trr ] rc larrd ERU 1991
D Dal i , ( 1991) Grouttdwoter i rr I t elarui CSI
5 9
Attachment 14
If no change is made to the curren! irrigation regime. I.e. if 2300m3 of sludge
continues to be pumped (0 the irrigatton fields, it would be expected to have no
additional impact over and above that described above for the proposed regime. This
assessment is based on the fact that (here will be very little difference in the total
sludge solids applied to (he ilTigation area in either regime and that the
hydraulicslhydrology of the system is govemed by precipitation rather than the
hydraulic load from the irrigation sprayers.
Recommendations
Regular re-Iocation of irrigation sprayers within tne irrigation areas might help to
immobilise more sludge in the soil layers of the drier pans of the lagoon thus reducing
the amount of run-off to the lagoon or ponded areas and thence [0 [he river G1ven
that there is II possibility of i\ gradual increase in IOlal P- levels in lhe o\'crilo\\' w{Iter
from the inigation area with lime due 10 inlemal loading, regular monitoring of both
flows and phosphonls levels i fl 1he ()u I flo \\' water would be advi sah Ie
References
Clabby, K.J , Lucey J 8:. M L .~1cGarrigle 1995 IJJlcnm RC/)(l,., 011 rhe /)/ol0l!I(.ol
Survcy (i R,lleI' Qualm' - J(c.l7drs/or /99-1 11/1'csrrgo[iol1.\. EPA Poncry RoadDun Laoighre, Co D\/blin
Fliln<lgan. P J 8:. Toner. P F (197)) .·1 }),-clifJIfllQ!T ,\lIn}cy of Insh rukes All rora.~
forbanha., Dublin Il'~ I'P
n wag3n. P J 6:. Lark in. P ~ 1 (\992) 1I'0[e,. Qlloli~I' 1/7 /rc lond N/,:";' - Jl)C)O } ',]1'/ I\m
- Nn'l!!' Qlloll(I' nO") [1l\,irOllmenlal Research Unit, Dublin 507 pp
Kilmanin. L (I (95) J)J'{!!J i(Il'{'/" J./lIlf.! WOICJ' QrlOlill' MOlli/orlllg Ref>of'f (\('I)lell/be!"
Nf)\'cmher 191,)./) EPA Regional Inspectorate, Castleb;)J
OECD (19S2) 1~'/{/mjlhJc(lJll)n(!( WtlIC/'S , A1olll/o!"lng AsseS'}I/ll'n! olld ('(II1l!'ul.
GECD PfiriS.
Meteorological Service: Rccord5
J. Mulqueen (J 991 ) So;I (1IIJ lfydfOlIl rc Aaspecrs 0.1 /he / AJlld AfJl)IIL'Dl iOIl of
Agric/lltllral Sh"T/c.\' lIod S(Hled WOlcrS Proc En\' Illlpacl Conf . SCPI 1991
L M. McCLJmis~cy II'{J/er III jl cland ER U 1991
D Dalv (1991 ) Cmllllall"OlCr III he/fwd GSI
59 J
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
T
:lil
-llb0
c)()l<
t<c)7
\
O-{t
tq{
L-.
o')
l
iIL
E(6
o)L
P
L(!
Ptr_o(
F
60
.U
t-an
-(f
t-an
-U
anE
)
m oT
rib
uta
ryS
tream
Riv
erL
ung
y----..<
138n
ada
Brl
dgc
Lou
ghG
:'ln
l
rloaL
Bri
dge
Riv
erB
reed
og
- A ~ ff f"'\ ;;r 3 Ib ::l
r+ ..... l:oo
1o cc=
====
=-_....
.zKf
1AR
EAM
AP
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
..\co\ v 1
o t l-tlt l
. l l' Il l
It l
- I
rt)F4
UZ=o-
U)
M.lrl
=
\i
I
tr
--4-'
a
,-4==
11:::' /
nt 14Attachme
LJZ
'"I"-- ~
V) ~) [-- ..-------;
o'"
\,~
.,,
,I\
\
\\
i\
\\\
\\\\
\\ \.\ ';
\,
\I
\I
\
\
\.,'.
I
I
I
~I
161
V)
•
, ..
-=" :.:..~,- . - J~- ,.-> ' .. I
~/ I-"~~~,,"-', ":;/--_ w,... '.,--,;._. ,_
'..... ...'j l(~;
'--/
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 14
I i o
l Jl ol >| ' Er - l ll : @I . A
l 0 6l t . -I u )t -l ( !l oI L
l o
l <o 5l o) =lo) i ;l r - -I r - . =
l o bl -f l ol o *l e q :f v =
I o r_ 3l e :l = a )l J c )l @ =l o @ llE ' I| _ ( o l
1 .9 "o lI th rDll > @ ll = o lI r u o lI F ! IL o l
<-51r = l
( 5 la 9'lo i l , _ |l- tr l(S - o-l* , : l
: r lv l
* _ l
F ; Io l
E - - t t f- I
(g (Dlo O l
o ) o lso l
- lJ - 1
r c lo lO I
L - s l
O ; l> _ > l _
n l
E = l, - l(o - li l |
6p cul. d I..\
G "OIF6 l
o i F r @ t t : @ r @ r @ t c c i t - - . - , t f ) , @ t @ ( o t r ) ' c v . q. q ' - t u ) l N r N r O l N r O l r C V , ^ . : L O r O t O ; , ,o r i l ; ^ t t * := l ; iE i ' - I + E : R 3 lP- : ( v ) r t N - C !
( o , ( f ) r r o r N r . q . < f , c 9 ! F , ( o . o t J , - r u ) , o N t \ . q o )N . ^ ; : ( o , ( e . @ o ) ' o ' - - i . o s R i l P P o . o c io ' : F - : \ o N . - . r l c { . n -
' q ( O ' O ) c 9 @ , ( O L ! ) ; F - N - O . @ c . l @ - ' q l
j : i ;NJIz=-*RESp.r .1O OOO
I
OioN u ,.R) ' -
zo -o -z 33 ; : - rc), c): c)' (fi: )., or, af)r o): o),/; < o o),
66 .
cc = ' > -= c o . : . =
- > \ E 9 > l -' F a : = ( o t i o = -- ( n - - - L- , L d ) - / n I - q r q !
o - : ! i = 9 - ' i i h n - ' . = € = = 2 . =_ > - : \ u : v v u , ^ ( u -
. c d : r E t r 6 . = , = o , o 5 6 6 b = 6 6F F o - < ' Q ' t - Z C ) i ( D r O , A t F . ( ) c ) O O - @
!
U)
zt lFz
6 2OJ N
Ta
ble
6R
ive
rL
un
ga
nd
Tri
bu
tari
es
-A
na
lysis
Re
sult
s(2
0-1
0-1
99
6)
Ii
1I
II
I.
SI
&S
2=
Tri
bu
tary
slre
am
.S
3&
S-1
=ov
erflo
wfr
on,
irri
ga
tio
na
rea
,S
S8.
6=
Sid
eS
lre
alll
ea
stor
Irri
gallo
nar
ea,
S7
&S
8=
Riv
er
Lu
ng
515
25
35
45
55
657
S8
Tiln
e09
,-1-1
10.2
60
9,2
61
0-1
01
2,0
41
2.1
31
2.4
51
1.0
0..
---~
..----
-T
em
p°C
11.5
12.3
11
.511
11
.51
1.5
111
1.5
...-
-.--.
_---
-_.,
._-
pH7
.tl9
7,6
57
.96
7.5
67
.36
7,3
97
.59
7.5
9tl
,57
80.
073
---..
.---
----..
-'-
-A
mm
on
ia11
19/1.
N0<
113
0'1
32
3.22
'10
.05
20
.01
60.
0<18
---~-
,...
.
Or1
ho
·PI1
1g/l,
P0
.22
80.
761\
3.0
17
2.2
80
.05
0.0
64
0.0
16
0.0
52
1n9f
1,P
..--_
..__
.--.
-..
"--
---
To
lal-
P0.
31\6
0.91
\6
,32
64
.10
80
,10
40
.12
20
.04
90
.09
1--_._~---
..--
-..---
Nit
rale
m~)f
l.N
1.1
57
03
0,4
80
.78
0.6
20
.69
0.7
30
.92
...
--.~-_._.-_.~.----
<;ll
l~ro
f1hy
lla
pg
flN
TN
T3
11
91
99
3NT
NT
2.0
85
6,1
51
.~
....
__._
--
BO
Drn
l)fIO~
II.I
tI5
1\6
27
1,2
1.4
1.3
1.'1
..---
--"
._.-
--...._-
DO
m~1l
02
72
5.9
NT
16
,86
.37.
87.
7,..
--.--
..-
Su
s.S
olid
srn
qll
7.1
7,1
16
61
9.5
3.3
35
5.5
To
lal
Ha
rdn
ess
1T19
/12
00
205
512
1\56
236
23
82
22
2301
,...
..._
--C
on
du
cliv
ilyII
S/e
m@
2S·C
31
66
60
22
01
70
842
443
33
45
357
Co
lou
rP
l/C
oU
nit
s16
215
220
<115
617
016
518
718
9C
hlor
J(J
cm
oll,
CI
15
65
0.7
30
6.3
220.
53
5.1
36,1
15
,617
.6P
ola
ssiu
mrn
g/I
.K
31
28."1
165
102.
22.
12.
41,
73
So(
JiuJ
nm
all,
N::J
t--
..,
\"1
70
.93
05
,621
5.1\
23.1
23
.21
0.9
14
.9N
T=
No
tT
est
ed
II
:f> ::; III n ::J"' 3 co ::J ~ .... +>-
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
\
{IIA
3v14
F-1-\ )
E0
Rttac}tment tq ..'-'\r'/2(
{r/ \=) ,,'\+ , . '
.a
IIli
t{-J
=La
aI
L
, / \\ /
\ /
etrJTJJ
Rr{J
H
t F )
{!
//
/ /
,,/
ocoVJ
---C/)
oz<..J~~
~
v~
c::'~~
f--<~
J
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
\_' \ *l\ f id
7 \ \A $ lv \ -
L \s
{{r(t{.
q,
\ ^A
f,(a-
=q{
\xc\
d . +L gr u: >l 0
F,$R6 d t>cJ)
3 3^W
\r2:lJ
rr, t{a.
lJs
Attachment 14
F . r*fC,o/r.
E\ \H)T \Jffi1 s
F #lbd){WK4i+ lg$ 3i€L--IH3H i
/r' { lt \ { l
l2r\, i
\\ 3iN
e Fllffiz5 iI llD'f/\-'t I
n l, _ l\ , 1
\ t rr { l
l \ *^|lmt i;i $ir 4l s Jo . r U
aFFI
t-4
lft
r-']-Eer l
Fi *i/fr) rb' ';e ] lllD/.,G ti I ilt/\S -
*=_ l/,s"__,ll2 ?,a.
,//s ii(8s-,lI
' VU
F
J3c(UJc!
IF : l l , / l - { l a < h u
Attachment 14
\II
\'V
-A.VI:l.<d.l-,
£:-<>W
-c.(/Iz~I-
::)0-
~:2 l>l
Cl~
~~c..~Ul
~\..~I'\''d,,::~ -"~
0..
-l-.J
<'"'":<:<-
~~Q..Vl~
<<0(
l-I
(::11
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
r it :: t
; l
10,i <Irui>
Otr.,
I.
, !, Ir l iriq i
t t lt t lI r l
--+-]-t l t -: l rr i
i l l -
loluJi O
Il>r O
"z
Rl i i I l,rni_l I-' i , , it l t '
r!lii iar=tiF t Z l '
l i l l l ' 't t - ll l r .l t l: i '
. i t -,c): ! O
. | : . - ' -: i t r :
coN
, r l i I
| | | it'* ,l l
l l
uJo
, i i lI i i i I l fr ,n
i I I I ' , o ' '
l l ! " , i
iii;:i-, :lli:i-i=rr-+tili;=;-i ;'-*il
I : i isi-j '?t i I ls'=, l?I D . I l - r . O' -q l l : 13-Tl-l--l--l-l- E --- .-;-f--f- S.
; ; ,Pr-r ' fr I | 'P'. ' rsr | | lHlul i ;r ,Hiol lsI I t I I I t ( n ' I I o
t t l G t
l_ l- i-T-, ; l l ----;| | I z r r . - ,$ l I i z l ^ , ' g
r ( l N r i t ! ' l < : ) 1 ( o, l l - l - l 6 , i l - , r 1 6
r | > l | | | >| : l < l i , = l I r
r ? l b
. r I l ( q l c t| ' l ^ l p
-F rb| ! r l t r l !| | | l - l r
. .-c, r CII| | r l E l o
, G : E' ' * t a
r s r g
l r
, It l
_ l -
i; iI
i
i l
. F I . D
-r o l i -
l g r <i o , 1 1i o-l cDl a l c: > l -
1 lP:-----v t I
g l l
I .
G I
Attachment 14
O
-(
r t
r-
Zri
V l r t- _ - \ jL | r>z l=i..*dAZ;A r - r (- - '<rrY>c(Pr-'1 r-1 v- r i J
aOov <='-- ,4 9- * . t - \\
I v ; .
-<=x \ -
( i . . :t- -'a l:'
> <9- H - )
{ -25t=2
tF : ' l ) . / l - . ( l 4 . 3 h q
~.-
-,1
-~---=-I~_,
__M~
Y_~,J~N_
'IJU
L9
3~,
_10
31
00
A~GI~
~6±~
~~:_
:!~~
~}-~
~~t~
~:-
..-I-
,---
+..
-~-,
----,
-f--,
...;
---
..-
,---
-+--
-,....
-
-'1
-'-
---
.._
.1--
,--
-I,.
--'
-
-t-
.."
,--
.I
'I
-I--
,DE
C''I-
YE
AR
---6
-"--'
-.6
29
-'N
OV
13
.--+
-,
'OCT 34
-I-.
--"'U
G--1
'S
EP
._
L,
85I
58
-
JU
N.
_+-
_.JU~_
7367
MA
Y
60
--
I._
R,'n"l
Ilmm)~
JI\~~l
!EEi-1
;;~R~-'
~A~.~
jB
alli
'gha
doT
Tec
n1
27
85
996
3
:-,-=,'
,T,_
'-..--
-=-=
-=-~
-_.-.
.-
~~_=J
~A
vera
ge
s!a
se
d0
",pe
~d(1
951
9901
Ev;lpor.;}~ion
{mm
)
(CI3
S~"-
Pilnil
B.~J"N
1-'F.EB
-=-I
-MA,R~I~
A:_R
l"m
8h
oro
'12
20tlO
63.
---
/-,-
--
--
-.,
--
-'IA
vera
ge
S-b
ase
don
pe'ri
od(196~-
i9(0
)
RA
INF
AL
LA
ND
EV
AP
OR
AT
ION
FIG
UR
ES
INll
AL
LA
GH
AD
ER
EE
NA
RE
A(S
Olin
CE
:1\1ETEOr~OLOGICi\LSE[~VrC1~)
"-
}> ::;
....
(lj
;;
() :s-
....
3
,. .c
t1l
::J ,... ~ J:>
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
INFLO\\ '
TotalInflou'
int
\ \ /ATER
Evapora t ion
nl
LOSSES
Percolat ion
Attachment 14
TotalInflou,
:m'
253241
149408
103833
Direct DischargeTo Stream
nt
16061 i
1248 -s I
) l / ( ) '
Rainfallt o 16 .5 ha
m.
Runofffrom l0
m'
62006
47768
14238
7 h a
Annual
Nov - Apr
May - Oct
r9 t235
t01640
89595
Evapo-Transpi rat ion
nt
NFLO\\/ TO IRRIGATION LANDS
Annual
Nor - Apr-
lr4ar'- Oct
15 i24 I
r 49408
1 0 t8 i l
601 88
r l 98 l
4 7405
I 8040
411 4
l ] 566
14200
7 l 00
7 l 00
OUTFLO\\/ FRO]\{ IRRIGATION LANDS
0 7 1 - t l d t t i c l
Attachment 14
Rainfall Runoff Totalto 16.:\ ha from 10.7 ha Inflow
m·' 0nl" m
ivmuaJ 19123:- 62006 253241
Nov - Apr 101 M0 47768 111940S
Mav - Oct 89595 14238 10383:-
INFLO\V TO IRRIGATJON LANDS
r~FLO\V \VATEH LOSSES
TOlal [, apo- [,"apOralloll Percolat ion DlreCl Dischar!!.eInflo\\ T rcl1spira t ion To Stream
:!l1 111 m nl III
Anllual
NO\ - Apr I~9~OS
18040
4474
1:\566
14200
7100
7100
160613
lJ4B" 1
OllTFLO\V FROM IRRJGATlON LANDS
L
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
I R R I G A T I O N L A N D EM BAN KME N T
AT
S H A N N O N S I D E
B A L L A G H A D E R R E E N
C O - O P E R A T I V E ,
, co . RoscoMMoN
R E P O R - I - O N S - T A B I I . _ I - T - Y
lnescal &ASSOCTATES
C O N S L J L T I N G
F N V I R O N I . ' E N T A L &
P O L L I . J T I O N C O N T R O L
E N G I N E E R S
Enterprise House,Centre Park Road, Cork, r r 'e lanci
Telephone; 02 1 -3 1 4i'88Fa :021-314369
Attachment 15
IRRIGATION LAND EMBANKMENT
AT
$HANNON$IDE CO-OPERATIVE,
BALLAGHADERREEN, CO. ROSCOMMON.
REPORT ON STABILITY
mescaL &
associates
CONSUI_T'NG
ENVIR.ONMENTAL 0
r- 0 L L UTI 0 NCO NT'" 0 L
I-::N<.;'NECH .....
l:nt{'lpnse House
(··jr·fa ROll .Ceir,"'lc'
Telcp'10ne: 021·314: 08Fj :021-31<3369
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
IRRIGAT ION LAND EMBANKMENT AT
SHANNONSIDE CO-OPERATIVE ,
BALLAGHADERREEN, CO. ROSCOMMON.
- R E P O R T O N S T A B I L I T Y
1 .
l l
t . z
1 . 3
2 .
2 .1
I N T R O D U C T I O N
T h e e f f l u e n t t r ^ e a t m e n t p l a n t
w a s t e s 1 u d g e s , w h i c h a r e
i r r i g a t i o n I a n d s I o c a t e d n o r t h
T h e p e r i m e t e r e m b a n k m e n t
g e n e r a i i y l o w i n p r o f i l e .
e n d o f t h e 1 a n d s , w h e r e t h e
d L
d ' i
o f
S h a n n o n s i d e
s p o s e d o f ,
t h e f a c t o r y
C o - O p p r o d u c e s
i n p a r t , t o
T h e i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s h a v e a l o w e a r t h e n e m b a n k m e n t a r o u n d
t h e p e r i m e t e r t o p r e v e n t d i r e c t s u r f a c e r u n - o f f . i n t o t h e
R i v e r L u n g . S o m e I o c a l i z e d p o n d i n g o c c u r s b e h i n d t h e
e m b a n k m e n t a t t h e e a s t e r n e n d o f t h e I a n d s .
T h i s r e p o r t e x a m i n e s t h e s t a b i I i t y o f t h e e m b a n k m e n t a t
t h e p e r i m e t e r o f t h e i r r i g a t i o n I a n d s .
E M B A N K M E N T C O N S T R U C T I O N
T h e i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s a r e s h o w n o n t h e a t t a c h e d K e y p l a n .
T h e a r e a i s I o w 1 y i n g , a n d a 1 o n g s i d e t h e R i v e r L u n g . T h e
I a n d s a r e p r o n e t o f 1 o o d i n g d u r i n g p e r i o d s o f h e a v v
r a i n f a ' l I i n w i n t e r .
w a s c o n s t r u c t e d ' l n 1 9 9 S , a n d i s
T h e e x c e p t i o n i s a t t h e e a s t e r n
b a n k l i s e s t o a m a x i m u m h e i q h t
2 ,2
Attachment 15
IRRIGATION LAND EMBANKMENT AT
SHANNONSIDE CO-OPERATIVE,
BALLAGHADERREEN, CO. ROSCOMMON.
REPORT ON STABiLITY
i . INTRODUCTION
1.1 The effluent treatment plant at ShannonSlde Co-Op produces
waste sludges, which are disposed of, in part, to
irr1gation lands located north of the factory.
1.2 The irrigation lands have a low earthen embankment around
the perimeter to prevent direct surface run-off into the
River Lung. Some localized ponding occurs behind the
embankment at the eastern end of the lands.
'.3 This report examines the stability of the embankment at
the perimeter of the irrigation lands.
2. EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION
2.1 The 1rrigation lands are shown on the attached Key Plan.
The area is low lying, and alongside the R\ver Lung. The
lands are prone to flOOding during periods of heavy
rainfall in winter.
2.2 The perimeter embankment was constructed in 1995, and 15
generally low in profile. The exception is at the eastern
end of the lands, where Lhe bank rises to a maximum height
J
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
2 .3
2 . . +
Attachment 15
o f ' l . 5 m . T h e c e n t r e b e r m w i d t h i s 3 . 0 m a n d t h e l e v e l o f
t h e c r e s t i s u n i f o r m a t 7 0 . 6 m a p p r o x . T h e s ' i d e s l o p e s o f
t h e b a n k a r e 5 0 " . c r o s s - s e c t i o n s b a n k a t t h e e a s t e r n e n d
a r e a t t a c h e d ; t h e s e a r e t a k e n a t t h e l o c a t i o n s s h o w n o n
t h e K e y P l a n .
T h e t o p w a t e r l e v e l i n t h e p o n d i s g o v e r n e d b y o v e r f l o w
p i p e s . T h r e e 1 0 0 m m d i a m o v e r f l o w s a r e a t l o . 2 m i n v e r t
1 e v e 1 , a p p r o x i m a t e l y ; a f u r t h e r 1 n o . 1 5 0 m m d i a m p i p e i s
a t 6 9 . 9 m i n v e r t 1 e v e 1 , a p p r o x i m a t e i y . r n n o r m a l c i r c u m -
s t a n c e s t h e w a t e r l e v e l l i e s a t 6 9 . 9 m . D u r i n g h e a v y
r a i n f a 1 1 , t h e I e v e l c a n r i s e t e m p o r a r i 1 y , t o a m a x " i m u m o f
7 0 . 3 m .
A s a r e s u l t o f t h e
c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e r e i s
p r i n c i p a 1 1 y c h i c k w e e d s ,
d ' i s t u r b a n c e o f t h e s o i I d u r i n g
e x t e n s i v e v e g e t a t i o n o n t h e b a n k ,
n e t t 1 e s , g r a s s e s a n d t h i s t I e s .
a
2 1
3 .2
M A T E R I A L
T l i a l h o l e I o g s a r e a t t a c h e d , a s r e c o r d e d a t t h e I o c a t i o n s
s h o w n o n t h e K e y P l a n . G r e y c 1 a y , w i t h s o m e g r a v e l a n d
c o b b l e s , I i e s o n a v e r a g e 1 . 5 m b e l o w s u r f a c e I e v e l i n t h e
a r e a i n q u e s t i o n a n d e x t e n d s t o d e p t h . T h e c i a y i s
o v e r l a i n b y o x i d i s e d u n c o n s o l ' i d a t e d p e a t a n d 3 0 o m m o f
t o p s o i 1 . T h e b a n k i s c o n s t r u c t e d o f m ' i x e d p e a t a n d c 1 a y .
T h e p e r m e a b i i i t y o f t h e p e a t i s e s t i m a t e d a t 5 . 0 x
m / s , w h i c h i s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f s u c h m a t e r i a l . T h e
c i a y h a s a s i g n i f i c a n t l y I o w e r p e r m e a b . i l i t y a t
e s t i m a t e d 5 . 0 x 1 0 - e m / s .
10 -=
g rey
an
Attachment 15
of 1.5m. The centre berm width is 3.0m and the level of
the crest 1S uniform at lO.6m approx. The sideslopes of
the bank are 50°. Cross-sections bank at the eastern end
are attached; these are taken at the locations shown on
the Key Plan.
2.3 The top water level in the pond is governed by overflow
pipes. Three 100mm diam overflows are at lO.2m invert
level, approximately; a further 1 no. 150mm diam pipe 1S
at 69.9m invert level) approximately. In normal circum
stances the water level lies at 69.9m. During heavy
rainfal), the level can rise temporarily, to a maximum of
lO.3m.
2.4 As c result of the disturbance of the soil during
construction, there is extensive vegetation on the bank,
pr1ncipally chickweeds, nettles. grasses and thistles.
3. MATERIAL
3.1 Trial hole logs are attached, as recorded at the locations
shown on the Key Plan. Grey clay, with some gravel and
cobbles, lies on average 1.5m below surface level 1n the
area in question and extends to depth. The clay is
overlain by oxidised unconsolidated peat and 300mm of
topsoil. The bank is constructed of mixed peat and clay.
3.2 The permeability of the peat is estimated at 5.0 x 10- 5
mis, which 1S representative of such material. The grey
clay has a significantly lower permeability at an
estimated 5.0 x 10- 8 m/s.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
4 .
4 . 1
4 .2
4 .3
4 . 4
4 t r .
4 . 6
Attachment 15
FLOW NET ANALYSIS
T h e m o s t c r i t i c a l s e c t i o n o f t h e e m b a n k m e n t , w i t h r e g a r d
t o s t a b i l i t y , i s S e c t i o n N o . 2 . T h e h e i g h t o f t h e b a n k i s
g r e a t e s t a t t h i s p o i n t , a t 1 . 5 m . A f l o w n e t a n a ' l y s i s w a s
c a r r i e d o u t f o r t h i s s e c t i o n , a n d i s a t t a c h e d . T h e
c a l c u l a t i o n r e f e r e n c e i s a t t a c h e d a s a n A p p e n d ' i x .
T h e c ' l a y l a y e r i s a s s u m e d ' i m p e r m e a b l e f o r t h e a n a l y s i s ,
w h i c h i s r e a s o n a b l e , g i v e n t h e s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e i n
t h e p e r m e a b i l i t y o f t h e p e a t a n d t h e c l a y .
T h e p e r m e a b i I i t y ' i s a s s u m e d t o b e c o n s t a n t a n d i s o t r o p i c
i n t h e b a n k a n d t h e u n d r s t u r b e d m a t e l i a l . T h i s . i s
r e a s o n a b l e g i v e n t h e s h a l l o w d e p t h o f t h e p e a t , a n d t h e
f a c t t h a t p e a t v / a s u s e d t o c o n s t r u c t t h e b a n k .
T h e m a x ' i m u m w a t e r I e v e l o f 7 0 . 3 m i s u s e d f o r t h e
a n a l y s i s . I n p r a c t i c e , t h e I e v e l r a r e l y r i s e s a D o v e
6 9 . 9 m . T h e r e f o r e , t h i s a s s u m p t i o n g i v e s a c o n s e r v a t i v e
r e s u l t .
T h e w a t e r t a b l e i s a s s u m e d t o l i e a t s u r f a c e l e v e l o n t h e
d o w n s t r e a m s i d e o f t h e b a n k . I n p r a c t i c e , . i t m a y I i e
3 0 0 m m o r m o r e b e l o w g r o u n d I e v e l . T h i s a s s u m p t . i o n a l s o
g i v e s a c o n s e r v a t i v e r e s u l t .
T h e f l o w c a l c u l a t i o n s a r e s h o w n o n t h e F l o w N e t A n a l y s i s .
T h e s o i l p a r a m e t e r s a r e e s t i m a t e d a t c = 0 . 5 t e / m z a n d
Q = 3 5 ' .
T h e f I o w n e t ' i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e t h e o r e t i c a l p h r e a t i c
s u r f a c e i n t e r s e c t s t h e d o w n s t r e a m f a c e o f t h e b a n k . t o
g i v e a s e e p a g e s u r f a c e a b o u t 2 5 0 m m 1 o n g .
4 . 7
Attachment 15
4. FLOW NET ANALYSIS
4.1 The most critical section of the embankment, with regard
to stability, is Section No.2. The height of the bank is
greatest at this point, at 1.Sm. A flow net analysis was
carried out for this section, and 1S attached. The
calculation reference is attached as an Appendix.
4.2 The clay layer 1S assumed impermeable for the analysis,
which is reasonable, given the significant difference in
the permeability of the peat and the clay.
4.3 The permeability is assumed to be constant and lsotropic
1n the bank and the undisturbed material. This 1S
reasonable given the shallow depth of the peat, and the
fact that peat was used to construct the bank.
4.4 The maximum water level of 70.3m is used for the
analysis. In practice, the level rarely rises above
69.9m. Therefore, this assumption gives a conservative
result.
4.5 The water table 1S assumed to 11e at surface level on the
downstream side of the bank. In practice, it may lie
300mm or more below ground level. This assumption also
gives a conservative result.
4.6 The
The
flow
so i 1
calculatlons are shown on the Flow Net Analysis.
parameters are estimated at c = 0.5 te/m 2 and
4.7 The flow net indicates that the theoretical phreatic
surface intersects the downstream face of the bank, to
give a seepage surface about 250mm long.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
I
5 .
5 .1
Attachment 15
EXAMINATION OF FAILURE MODES
There a re t h ree f a i I u re modes t o be cons i de red i n r e l a t ' i on
to ea r t hen dams .
"P i p ' i ng " and up l i f t due t o seepage p ressune .
"S lough ing " due t o e ros ion o f t he seepage su r f ace .
I ns tab i l i t y due t o s ' l i ppage .
T h e s e m o d e s a r e e x a m i n e d a t t h e c r i t i c a l s e c t i o n .
5 . 2 P i o i n q a n d U p l i f t
P ' i p i n g r e f e r s t o t h e a c c e ' l e r a t i n g d e v e i o p m e n t o f
p r e f e r e n t i a l f 1 o w p a t h s t h r o u g h a n e m b a n k m e n t , I e a d i n g t o
e r o s i o n o f t h e s o i ' l
, a n d e m b a n k m e n t f a i I u r e . T h e c r i t r c a l' l o c a t ' i o n
i n c o n s ' i d e r i n g p i p i n g i s a t t h e t o e o f t h e
e m b a n k m e n t . I t c a n o c c u r w h e n t h e f l o w n e t i n t e r c e p t s t h e
d o w n s t r e a m f a c e o f a n e m b a n k m e n t . ' Q u i c k ' a c t i o n c a n a l s o
o c c u r i m m e d ' i a t e l y o u t s i d e t h e t o e , d u e t o t h e p r e s s u r e o f
r i s i n g w a t e r o v e r c o m i n g t h e s o i I ' s s e ' l f - w e i g h t .
A t t h e c r i t r c a 1 s e c t ' i o n o f t h e e m b a n k m e n t , t h e
s e l f - w e i g h t o f t h e t o e m a t e r i a l a d e q u a t e ' l y r e s i s t s t h e
u p 1 i f t p r e s s u r e s e x e r t e d b y t h e t h e o r e t i c a l s e e p a g e
t h r o u g h t h e b a n k s , d s o u t l i n e d i n t h e F l o w N e t A n a l y s i s .
1 .
2 .
3 .
S o m e t r i c k f i n g h a s b e e n o b s e r v e d a t
t h e v i c i n i t y o f S e c t i o n s 2 a n d 3 .
i n e x t e n t , a n d c o u I d b e e x p e c t e d
m a t e r i a ' l i n t h e b a n k . A ] s o t h e
b a n k s i n c r e a s e s t h e s o i I s t a b i I i t v
t h e b a n k .
t h e t o e o f t h e b a n k ' i n
H o w e v e r , t h ' i s i s m i n o r
g i v e n t h e n a t u r e o f t h e
d e n s e v e g e t a t i o n o n t h e
a n d a b s o r b s w a t e r f r o m
Attachment 15
5. EXAMINATION OF FAILURE MODES
5.1 There are three failure modes to be considered 1n relation
to earthen dams.
1. "Piping" and uplift due to seepage pressure.
2. "Sl oughi ng" due to eros) on of the seepage surface.
3. Instab,lity due to slippage.
These modes are examined at the critical section.
5.2 Piping and Uplift
Piping refers to the accelerating development of
preferentia1 flowpaths through an embankment, leading to
erosion of the soil, and embankment failure. The critical
location 1n considering piping is at the toe of the
embankment. It can occur when the flow net intercepts the
downstream face of an embankment. 'Quick' action can also
occur immediately outside the toe, due to the pressure of
ris1ng water overcoming the soil's self-weight.
sect,on of the embankment. the
toe material adequately resists the
exerted by the theoretical seepage
as outlined in the Flow Net Analysis.
At the critical
self-weight of the
uplift pressures
through the banks,
Some trickl,ng has been observed at the toe of the bank ln
the vicinity of Sections 2 and 3. However, this is minor
ln extent, and could be expected given the nature of the
material In the bank. A1so the dense vegetation on the
banks increases the soil stability and absorbs water from
the bank.
J
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
5 .3 S l o u q h i n q
E m b a n k m e n t " s l o u g h i n g " o c c u r s d u e t o o v e r t o p p ' i n g o f a b a n k
o r t o h i g h s e e p a g e f l o w r a t e s a t t h e t o e o f t h e b a n k .
O v e r t o p p i n g i s p r e v e n t e d b y t h e o v e r f l o w p i p e s . T h e w a t e r
I e v e l t y p i c a 1 1 y l ' i e s a t 6 9 . 9 m , a n d r i s e s o n l y t e m p o r a r i l y
d u r i n g h e a v y r a i n f a i 1 , t o 7 0 . 3 m m a x . T h e r e f o r e
o v e r t o p p i n g i s n o t l i k e l y . R e g a r d i n g s e e p a g e , v i s u a l' i n s p e c t i o n a t t h e t o e o f t h e e x t e r n a l b a n k s s h o w e d o n l y
m i n o r s e e p a g e e m e r g i n g . A g a i n t h e d e n s e v e g e t a t i o n a c t s
t o i n c r e a s e t h e r e s r s t a n c e t o s o i l e r o s i o n .
5 . 4 S l i p p a q e
T h e a t t a c h e d S l i p C i r c l e A n a i y s e s w e r e c a r r i e d o u t t o
a s s e s s t h e s t a b i 1 i t y o f t h e c r i t i c a l s e c t i o n a g a i n s t
s l i p p i n g . T h e s e c t i o n w a s e v a l u a t e d a t b o t h t h e u p s t r e a m
a n d d o w n s t r e a m s i d e s . T h e a n a l y s e s ' i n d i c a t e d f a c t o r s o f
s a f e t y g r e a t e r t h a n 1 , i m p 1 y i n g s t a b l e c o n d i t i o n s . T h i s
c o n c l u s ' i o n i s s u p p o r t e d b y f i e l d o b s e r v a t i o n s , i n t h a t n o
e v i d e n c e o f s l i p p a g e c r a c k s w a s t o b e s e e n .
6 .
6 .1
C O N C L U S I O N
T h e e m b a n k m e n t a t t h e p e r i m e t e r o f t h e s h a n n o n s i d e
i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s i s b u i l t t o c o n t r o ' l l e d p r o f i l e s a n d
l e v e ' 1 s , a n d i s d e n s e l y c o v e r e d w i t h v e g e t a t i o n . F . i e l d
o b s e r v a t i o n s ' i n d ' i c a t e t h a t t h e b a n k . i s s t a b l e . N o
e v i d e n c e o f s l o u g h i n g , s l i p p i n g o r u p l i f t w a s o b s e r v e o .
T h e o b s e r v e d t r i c k l i n g a t t h e t o e o f t h e b a n k a t t h e
e a s t e r n e n d i s n o t s t r u c t u r a l I v s i q n i f i c a n t .
Attachment 15
5.3 Sloughing
Embankment "sloughing" occurs due to overtopping of a bank
or to high seepage flow rates at the toe of the bank.
Overtopping is prevented by the overflow pipes. The water
level typically lies at 69.9m, and rises only temporarily
during heavy rainfall, to lO.3m max. Therefore
overtopping 15 not likely. Regarding seepage, visual
inspection at the toe of the external banks showed only
minor seepage emerging. Again the dense vegetation acts
to increase the resistance to soil erosion.
5.4 Slippage
The attached Slip Circle Analyses were carried out to
assess the stability of the critical section against
slipping. The section was evaluated at both the upstream
and downstream sides. The analyses indicated factors of
safety greater than 1, implY1ng stable conditions. This
conclusion is supported by field observations, in that no
evidence of slippage cracks was to be seen.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1 The embankment at the perimeter of the ShannonSlde
irrigation lands is built to controlled profiles and
levels, and 1S dense1y covered with vegetation. Field
observations indicate that the bank is stable. No
evidence of sloughing, slipping or uplift was observed.
The observed triCkllng at the toe of the bank at the
eastern end is not structurally significant.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
The geo techn i ca1 ana l yses o f t he
suppor t t he conc l us i on above .
i nc l uded i n t h i s r epo r t .
Attachment 15
embankmen t s t ab i l i t y
The ca ] cu l a t i ons a re
I
l
tt:li
6 .2
S ' i gned :
KEVIN F ITZGIBBON BE MEngSc M IE I
f o r Mesca ' l & Assoc i a tes
Da te : November 1996 .
Signed:
Date: November 1996.
Attachment 15
embankment stability
The calculations are
KEVIN FITZGIBBON BE MEngSc MIEI
for Mescal & Associates
The geotechnica1 ana1yseS of the
support the conc1usion above.
included in this report.
6.2
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
-
Attachment 15
=!:B
Lt
-6
s
r)
oz
Z
o-
LU\Z
\\'
\ \\ , \
I,f,t r f i
t { -
< l r
5 l r
Ir, //,
+\
\
\\
\\
/
ftzU
Y
z@sU
a
zJ
z;
d.d
,/-4-
L.Fil ' i
- - - t l it t :
l l il irI l r
\6)zd
3U
\J O.rO Ndc {
r l'2
.z
- . 2
~ .... ClI n 7 3 (l) ::J ... I-'
VI
........
:rrt
·
N A'
'....
o5
010
0M
_..
I
21/'
,~
~·l
,../
'
PL
AN
KEY
---.----
----:--'--:'~~~:-:"'~'-
......--
-..---
IRR
IGA
nO
NL
AN
DS
~---------
----
~~--
-----
_---
-.-~
--._
-.-.
'.-C-C~~
--_
._',.
,--:~\\
.:..
.-'•
•~-
I \' ::'-
-
PR
OP
OS
ED
WO
RK
S
TB
M7
1.9
m
,~ '\ 1;\ \\ \"\ 'l
N~s
.."-,.
EM
BA
NK
ME
NI.
.-'
'j'-~~--""""--"~'"''
•·-
'~·"
:'=~
NOO"
,~'(
~CS._
~~.....
......._
----~~~
~'-'
~r"r
''
........
..~-'
//"
"---~~-r
.----::-
-'lr-_.
".
-v-
J-~.~~
~--
,'"
>h
.'"
:~?
""'-
,-Sl
r>t.
....
NO
,I
L-.L
1
TI(
Jo\l
lit
,11
~
(K
('I
S·"
rli
ON
S .~.~,
~.,~
J"-..-
I.1
:/
,I':.::;
;~I
,",-
----~~------
l~
------
11
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
NO. ' l
NO. 2
NO. 3
NO.5
NO.4
CROSS-SECTIONS 1/7 s
TWL 703Y PO~ /__________7
NO.
TWl 70.3
?OND
NO.2
TWL 703v PON) 1
____~7
NO.3
Tl\'L 70,3
-----'Y'''-------------71PONf\ /
---------'
NO.4
TWL 703-->Y''------__p_O!'I:_\_/
NO.5
70.6\7
70.6D
70 tv
Attachment 15
'" 70.1"''--_----'\7'''-------_
691
7C',0\;
~,'---'-'----
700v
CROSS-SECTIONS 1/75
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
NO. NO.TOPSOIL
DARK BROWN PEAT
PALE GREY CLAY(DAUB)
NO.TCPSOII-
DARK tsROWI! PIAT
GREY CLAY WITHSOME COBBLIS(DAUB)
NO.
TRIAL
DARK BROWN PIAT
PALI GRt\(DAUB)
HOLES
Attachment 15
NO. 1 NO. 2
o
TOPSOIL ~O.3
DAR~~ BROWN PEAT-= 1.4
ALE GREY CLAYDAUB)
-= ],
p(
TOPSOI~
DARK GREY COBBLYCLAY WITH BOULOC:RS(DAU3)
NO. 3 NO. 4" .
~ '.-
D RI< :POV\ -: [ T
I--!..s:z c:..
PALE c;::-,L' I /c,';
mA' '~':
_ _ .=:?- 2.0GREY CLf:. 'SOI\J,E COB(DAUB)
IH.---'---
,------,...:;:z 3.0
TRIAL HOLES)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15\rJe{-
r2F
- I . ". r S t, < bh aa ; 'n l d
- ; + t' $ . \
{ a ." , t ru Q s . )
d : ' I Nl F V i ^4 . A t l v N: i q < xC r o ^ t
i ' - r o * -
Ub r r l L f l
P . - S - r V \ { . _P " { t z' - o l
t o - $ :r - - _ ry { a
' / " i . i ; )13
, . . 1 n \ : -
i ' i l i i I r Nx l t i l i , ' l,ul* ? 6 "o d1- - l i ' { * : i <
| ! , . . " Fr . , l c P r l ? v ]
VlXi{ : , - . i fHani i i $, T i l i . a q a L ! r .n * l , i 9 j $ s c i l
?F 03 iE a
Y \I:
> ds u -
R$ <'
\ ,
t
\
F
t:)
F <L, Lu l u
A r ,
U)(t)
z
FIJJz=
oLt-
N
ozzIFULUV)
i ns \q ( L
l 0 ' l n- N
> d - $
=) a
l0 F
f,- c r r t s0 -! :d u< : i 4 ;o t
i i! , < q - ur l i f : -l r j l . . l I i7 l - h u
l : J
> l , <d in l L d av-l
i-{ +
rLl < i :
xi:,t
I
G.eaa
) : r
r ) d
* :! D \
I
eF
L
f ; ^
q
r< LQ F\ -
\_) {Y t r
I
I. l: li Jllt ql l t ' p
t-
u t I iu l - v
6l r (c t I\ l
n l u t| - s "41 11
r . . l ' ; r 1 : iU l .5r ; ; :{ lR;" " "b l r i r t l l
\ r l ' " . r!01 o-o r\ t d
i)
;C/.~..
......
rOIl
P
P,I
tEc."
ON
OF
~!..Ep",~
E't.~UL"AA.l
r
~r·l
.'"
----
G,lP
.TII
E;{
t;;"
M/Y
JJl:
MO
H/r
r..n
r>.J
'>e~
.JlJ
e,It
t.IC
jA1
tON
~A
T.F
."-
~---,-
I/
'-..,-
.
f----
I
-/.-
" I
----j-
I·
(bllJ
J3)
_,j\;r~
(...
.1.)
';0
_1
0'-....
..,
7c'
~...
rl,/
L
:2
G,I
UY
C-L
A'(
fL;R
M~'
"!l
oIL
IfY
1-I1
i(O
N.V
:l./
f>A
"!P
ITA
I
;'f
.r.~
t:"
(>H
.rrr
~.
It""
-"""/~
/-pP
'.....C
"..,.
'/0
!::C
UIP
Ol~lJ
Tr"L
~
"Y
l>V
\UU
C"i
RA
,",,
'T"7
e
lIT
TO
E
I,
lJ".
<:.
)1A
)...\t
..\tL
.So
0·4
.,
iW
IDT
I-f
-C
.LS
>M
(r~_/t»~
...(O.7-<;;<>/D-~)
~H
=ScE
T'(\
SE
FO
RC
roL.c"sr()~,R.
~~"'-tS
.\\"1
,EQul,/,r~~'rl"Lc;,
rLC
,-/L
IN€
t.€
lJc,r
lls.e
<;M
';';
r-o~c.e
1<'<,
JoC.TltJ~
A4
NN
S"T
IU-.
uJL
T1
Iu7
2.~
,,*/"
'l~
~5
'N4
cv
o~
~OIL
O_'Z~,
K'\
MAS~
(O-d
r?
,
1tr
:.'S
J.\
7A
A'C
Fr
1.I
p.
OIS
IW/l
Tf/
i.7'
AC
·cf;
:-:;
'1D>
~_p'~A.1r>
~\';t'.o
01"4
SlI
D3,
..c.
,'=.
ou
7
NE
T
Al
fhO
V(\J
,5E
:E:"P
/I<3F
:.s
UR
-FA
C.E
.,.
-:.O~
h=
04.7
""1
L,
..I
L.......
hl'l
~·1'14'
"'_1
'-3-
(\.
,.<
.LJ.
r"r.
l{;"
C,
1)(
o_
v,.
;....
Q~~$,Au
c~
,.
-;.-""
A,"
-L"
~~PA'"
EA
xle
b-
en
'"""
Tro
";
SE
CT
ION
AN
AL
YS
ISF
LO
WN
ET
No.
2
» ,..,. ,..,. ll.l
n -::r 3 Cb :l ,.. ~ L
n
~~-----~----
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15,(nM
€-
\
o l |$ qt0
i td nl,; l r u li . l l t L lil co orl f l l ' r 5 l rh l , , < l ;? l> f l :U I * I Y
l o l N
tl8 --,1 ,,x t , ; t -01.4 ,xl *
,-\
A
tl
u
\
t.--
L
c\
lO-O
z:
X^ lcul
Ixl* l
lr'l Is!
,if-
* {51 " $$li*l i s;: ,
"-B l I , . l s i l ' - J
;t , r i j;; :i,2 v ) < 6 < 6
t h - r h r - A
t[JFlt 5ru ftrf t;F'31.{$,u . l " 6 o ' : -
i l ' , '*r-gl-j)E;j:.d$flu-, .. \ ^ =l! * '9i{oxI:lf;ri.* "l [':*..*q,,,el$;i '{ ;.|$l; } *k'
v3 lT ^ 4 1- [ l* h l. i l'
"rl-l( l
lt l
- t lo+ 1
.o
a t rol
il
a v,)F \ {
cfl-!
0I
t\
EA
\j-
q
N
st!^
o
. \
U)LUU)
z
lr-l
UE
TJ
o-=U)
c\
ozzCFULLI(t)
olxt'/l
q{ }
I , F
F P< f :\ ! s
F
'
- _ s o , - {
* t * - lN s - - . J! . - N n
s t S \+ r r i
^ Q s c ' MX \ " U\ F ' r \\ ^ '- \ \ s
t-tu{\ s q \
\ A \ $
,R{ \ .\ \ s
t ^ ' Y s IN \ r ^ J
q s s q
S s $ uX ' o S f *Y \ ! $t r ( r i
t * "1** " . L S t\ \ \ \
, - t; - ,\ a
F l a I
. t l9 ex l w<1.* *fr|tr re-l
l r u^ n l u -
l - < -t.rll _io l - { 3v) l& s
--, Dr 2 . : -
F l o t zz l Q!!t < llJ
$ l - H* l t , ?
e l
l c { -
NH:\ r l5 ,n l9 I
!
rFL!
n
< +n j
F\ \ J
L
v,i
::5ID~
AD
O....
.,.;
CjU
V>I
EN
TSID~
B>U
(?'\
VlD
I~,jT
S'P
.lf'
wT
(.DMPO'II;~l~
rOQ.~wA-n-:R..
Ef.
[.N
ow
v.t
Po~""'W/l7£~
fH.~~l"'AL
NO
.Ie
N\j
c)
T(1
e)FoI2C:~
LI(I
e)f=
opn;
:IJ
'O
r')(o
a.c.
eU
(-Ie
)W
£.<:
.eIV
'(h
:)
OZ~c
(J.o
9{·
0./
75
-eJ
.09
b0
·09
0..
o.e
v{,
1-0.
1..1
'"0
./9
'"IJ
U'-
;;tJ
t»8
0.I
e6
IJ1
,17
-o.
I"3
....r·
n('-
O.I
f:}t
;O
.)
>7.
IJ,O
"C?
(>IS
'S'
1/
19
'7-
t'.
2.1
1·
-I,..
C15e
-(Jo
no
1:0
1-
0.<
941,
o0>
11'
.4
(1J.
-0
.JC
t.
L<
C-,
>I?
'z.
.".
1.6
8z·
-0
.H
lt
SID
E:
A•
'1>
ovJr
Jc,l
tAP
IEJ'
lT
~';,1';,7Al-.lC.E
R..
--C.
~\J
'T
AN
epc.
.c.
<L
O.~
lu
s),
l.o
'J...
./....
>-I'
TJq
J(J
~t1.f{,~
TT
l,)J~"',
0.»
t'<:./
,.,
R..
/.0
8--
D.>~
.'·4
1I~
/"1As
Il."
TIf
'1
.41
"0
'>lit
-">
S71
11>
L.€
S'p
"f,
-un.IU\c>'(;~7
U,q
CO
I,IS
DU
p-\
I~r
P(A
T
» .... .... III
n ::T'
3 III
:J .... ..... lJ1
IS~
¢.0
.'5
1l;
/"I'
c.--
AJ
'TA
N~
•IV
""'T
£fl
..
.o.~~
~1I~
+.e
z:.:
T+
T",
T"",
D.!
+c.
...0
·3=-
o.al~~
=-:>
1>.--I
.IJ<::
IS~TM(.£
f'Ait.A""'eTt:~
l·o
,e/M~
c.'-
f2.E
S-'
-"7
/Wcr
;12
c.•
,09
to:)
""
".l'r
".!
q.
-c.4
B1
-01
1,)
lS'"
,-0
-48
1'7
IiO
"'PD
1::l>
II!."",
!.."7
A>-
>:';;
;"J
>lJG
1'1::>
fJ'
J-J..
..•
No
RM
AL
~N'I
CCtJ
E,,"
,7\"
IflG
;l-n
01
:1N
,.,7U
f;J"'"
+e.
t.--
/-0
8-
OJ.~
'!I
~
Prs
..T
UQ
.Ot!
X;
ro~c;
T~
O.~/
(,~
i
->D
~o
.'S
lbA
s-g
;>:D
X"1
~
U~t.-E
c.o"-l-s.T~tJc.TION
~'SO°
\('
+6~
e·r;;
-e;.'
$.O
IL
'S1J
:>e.
A
2N
o.S
EC
TrO
N
(1:>
1\U
1:)
'1,,
'//k
..-~
(0/
fl~[
EATl
r_::
SUH
AC
.£~
IW
AT
ErJ~-~r:l
GI'.~'(
cL
A'(
\;/,
/y-
'./V
",-
-A/V
\./
'",.)
,;'.
/-,
,/"
,'....
,/...
SID
(;&
nd
"10
.$M
SLIP
CIR
CLE
AN
AL
YSES
bII:
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
APPEIIDIX
EXTRACT FROM "Pr inc ip les of Soi I Mech:n ics" by
Ronald F. Scot t
Adison Wesley Publications Conpany
Inc . 1963 .
: '.:i
'l;il.: -'
APPENDIX
EXTRACT FROM
.~ I~ ••~ ~'._
II Principle.s of Soil Mechanics II by
Ronald F. Scott
Adison Wesley Publications Company
Inc. 1963 .
.::_::";rf-~.·.- _
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15STEADT- TATE FLOW
0.4
0.3
A a i ,o+ la
0 . I
90 120
S. degrees
Frc. -!-13. Determins.t ion of ci ischarge point. (After Casagrende)
top florv line, draw the "basic paraboia " given by Eq. (HJ) using point Dof Irig. +-10(a) as the focus and the value of s from Eq. ({-l6a). ih" dis_tance betrveen tbe point of intersection of the parabola and lhe dorvnstreemslope of the dam .Ie and the discharge point ../ mea=ured along the slope isterrned Aa. The relationship of Ao to (a = Aa) found by sketching
^no,u
nets for a number of dif ierent angles p is plotted on a graph (Fig. j_r:1.The basic parabola is then altered to curve smoothly into the &scha{epoint obtained by stepping off the distance aa from the point -Ie. Sketchiifthe flow net n'ill give successive eorrections to the assumed curve until al-itbe florv and boundrry conditions are met.
Falkovich [33] presents a solution for a in terms of the flow q and theangle p when the upstream face is far from the discharge slope and no tailwater is present. Although the paper does not say so, pr"r.r-"bly the inten-tion is to com.:ute g approximately by meens of Eq. (1.+7).
Solutions for the free-surface florv ijne are given in the literat,ure for otherctses of f lorv. e.g., to a rvell. to a s1'stem of drains in the soil, to or from ariver or cr.nal, etc. i21, 31, 36]. By the use of these soiutions, an approximatedetermination of the free-sunace line cen usuall-"- be made in given condi_tions, end this cen be repeatedly improved as the florv net sketching pro-ceeds under the prevail ing boundary conciirions.
The limitations on the use of sketching as a solution technique havealready been pointed out. It is norv eppropriate to consider other methodsof deeling rvith the problem.
4-4 Electricai analory- The c.neiogy betrveen fluid, thermal and electrica.iflorvs has been mentioned before. The Laplacian equation also describesrhe magnetic f ield about a magnet, the displacement of a rubber membraneperpendicuiar to its plane (the displacement is not necessarily small I i0]),r.nd the irrotational potential f low of f luid. In the present probl.* of-flowin porous media, the flow is undoubtedly rotationai on the ,oi.ror.opic scale,but irrotational from the overe.li vierv. These other physicai situations maynow be considered from the point of vierv of obtaining solutions to seep&geproblems.
The soluti5'n to a problem invoiving the steB,dy-state flow of heet undergiven boundary conditions wiil yield a therms.l field consistinr of iines of
r80r506030
\
\
Attachment 15
STE.ADY-STATE FLOW
13015012090
r- ___ .........
I-...
~
~
I I l~I I I ~Io
30
0.3
0.1
0.2~a
a+~a
0.4.
p. degrees
FrG. ~-l~. Determin.3.tion of disch~rge point.. (-Hter Cn.sagr~nde)
top flow line, draw the "basic parabob tI given by Eq. (+--15) using point Dof fig. -!-lO(a) :l.S the focus and the value of S from Eq. (+---16a). The distance between the point of intersection of the parabola and the downstre:lmslope of the daro J 0 and the discharge point J me~ured along the slope istermed .6a. The relationship of ~a to (a -+- .6a) found by sketching flownets for a number of different angles {3 is plotted on a graph (Fig. 4-12).The basic par:lbola is then altered to curve smoothJy into the dischargepoint obtained by stepping off the disb.nce 6a from the point J o. Sketchingthe flow net will give successive corrections to the assumed curve until allthe fio\l..· and boundary conditions :lTe met.
FaLkovlch [:331 presents a solution for a in terms of the flow q and theangle f3 when the upstream face is far from the discharge slope and no tailwater is present. Although the paper does not say so, presumably the intention is to COIl'Jute q approximately by me3.ns of Eq. (-!--!7).
Solutions for the free-surface flow line :ue given in the uterature ior otherC.1.Ses of flow. e.g., to a well. to a system of drains in the soil, to or from ariver or canal. etc. [21, 31, 36]. By the use of these solution~, an appro;-,.irnatedetermination 01 the free-surface tine c~n usually be made in given conditions, J.nd this c:m be repeatedly impro\."ed ~ the flow net sketching proceeds under the prevailing boundary conci cions.
The lirn.jtations on the use of sketching as a solution technique havealready been pointed out. It is now :l.ppropriate to consider other methodsof de.3.1ing \\.j t.h t.he problem.
4-4 Electrical analogy. The 3.nalogy between fluid, thermal and electric:llflows has been men boned before. The Laplacian equatlon also descri besthe magnetic field about a magnet, the displacement of a rubber membraneperpendicular to its pbne (the displacement is not necessarily small [10]),:l.nd the inotational potential flow of fluid. In the present problem of flowin porous media, the flow is undoubtedly rotational on the microscopic scale,but irrotational from the overall view. These other physical situatiorlS maynow be considered from the point of view of obtaining solutions to seepageproblems.
The solutio-D to :l problem involving the steady-state f1.0\V of he:lt undergiven boundary conditions Vvill yield a therIJ:ill1 field consi..<i,ing of lines of
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
I
Ht
m:o sin A/H
r":".ra--T-)\l i l l ll l l l l
b
Attachment 15
(+-51)
i3, degrees
Flc. - l- I I . Determireetion of length of seepage surfsce. (-\f ter Gilboy)
(l:_+3) and (+-++). \lten p.is less than, or equal to 90o, the top florv line
becomes tangentiel to the d'orvnstree'm slope at the intersecrion' lf B is
;;;1h"o-g0", tbe tangenr to the top ff,orv l ine rt rhe point of irs inter-
section rvith rhe slope is veriicel iJ the permerbii ity of the meterial sup-
porting the toe, or ihe drein' is verv large'
To obtaio "
f lo*-ner solution when 6 has env velue' the leneth of the
seepaee surface o-b.r.u".n the base of the dem D end lhe dischorge p'Lint ' l
(Fig {_lOa) ., ' l ..., be determined. .\ssumine r dorvnstleam slope engie J
oi less r ,han: l0" lC"=rgrt , rde f+l g ives an rDDro-r imete solur ion ior a b:rseci
on ihe DuPuit rssumPtion:r o f f .
n - t 1 -
cosr 6 s in: 13t i
o-;;;-!
-{ more exlct solution for velues of r3 betrveen 0" and 90o rvas deveioped
b-"* Gi iboy [ l : i ] ""J O* inco the. graphicr l folm,of Fig' {- I l bv Tavior [- lgi '
In a given .".",^^J i, .o*puted by either of the trvo methods above' end
the phreetic surfece-pa.raboil i: then drawn tengential lo. the downstrer'm
siope ar the p"ir t l l ' rho*n T Fig.+-10(r) l " :d
passing.through the point '
F in Fig. a-8. Thr. forms the basis for the flow net, which, in the course
of construction, *itt g.o"raliy mod.ify the top flow line somervhat' since
the top flow line;iU f" altered as the net is drewn, Casagrande [4] suggested
an aiternative -.i[oa of soir-irg the probiem. In this case, to sketch the
Attachment 15
90
m=a sin f3IB
2 r-----':-----J~~~---"'-..,.....__...:..
I Im =O.5-~...--......
'-----'-_ m =0.7 :::1=:::::;::~~'::::::::'.....!..c-=::::::::::-_~-I
mi0 9i
OL---~~-----'--~--'--"':---'------":---':::~
o 30
· SOLUTION BY SKETCHmG
12' I,r-b-
bH
p. degrees
FIG. -!-ll. Determina.tion of length of seepag~ surface. (.\.fter Gilboy)
(~3) md (.f--±-!-). \-vnen ~ is less than, or eq©l to 90° , the top flow linebecomes tangential to the downstream slope olt the intersection. If f3 i~
gre:lte~ tb.1.D 90°, the L.1.ngent to the top flow line J.t t,be point of its inte~
section with the slope is vertic:ll if the pe[ffie~bility oi the m:1te!"i.1.L .5Up
poning the we, or the drain. is \"·ery large.To obtain :l now-net solution \vhen B ha~ J.ny v:llue. (he le~gth of [he
seep.1.ge surbce a bet\V"een the base of the dolm D and the discharge pvt:nl J(fig. -:-10.1.) must, be determined. _4..ssuming:l downstre:lm slope angle 3Of le~s lbJ.n :30c
. CJ.s.:lgr:lnde Hl gi\'e~ ::l.D J.pprQx:m:.lte ::olution for a bJ.~eci
00 "he Dupuit J.ssumpLion.:
da= -
cos ,13
f d'2~'cos'2 {3
H~
sin ~ p
_\ more ex~ct. solution for v:llues of i3 bet,ween 0° ::md 90° W.1.S developedby Gilboy (131 :lnd put into the graphical form of Fig. -!-11 by Taylor (-!OI·In <l given case, a is computed by eitber of lbe two metbod~ :lbove, andthe phreatic surface par.:lbob is then drawn t.:lngential to tbe do\vnstreJ.mslope at the poiot J [shown in fig. -1-10(:1) I aod passing through the pointF in Fig. -1-8. This forms the basis for the Row net, wb..ich, in the courseof construction, will gener3.Uy modify the top flow line somewhat. Sincethe top flow line will be altered as the net is drolwn, Casagrande [4] suggestedan alternative method of solving the problem. In tb..is C:lSC, to sketch the
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:12
Attachment 15
PRII{CIPLESOF
.{DDISON-\ ,VES LEY PT BLISHI\ GR E A D I - \ c , M I ' S S a C H U S E T T S P . { L O
SOIL MtrCFIAI{ICS
0tJ
RO\.\LD F. SCOTT
-lssoczale Proiessor oj CtdI Enqinen'ing
C aiiiornio I nstihtte oi T ecimology
^.
YV
CO], iP. \NY, iNC.. { L T O L O N D O N
Attachment 15
PRINCIPLESOF
SOIL MECHANICS
RO\-.-\.LD f. :3COTT
.l ssoc:ate Professor of CiL-il Enqineerinq
Caiijornia I nsLitlile of Technoloqy
:~ D DIS 0 ~- - vV E 5 LEY P t- B L I :3 HI\" G- C 0 :'vIP .\ :; Y J I ~ C ,
READI~G, MASSACHUSETTS P.-\ LO .-\ LTO LO)[DO:-i
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
L
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
Attachment 15
{L _
'$
Attachment 15
\
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
Planning Reference: 5057 Series
Transcribed from a Copy of Part of the Original Planning Permission Attachment 16
R E Q U I R E M E N T N 0 . 4 : T h e d e v e l o p e r s s h a l I s u b m i t ,f o r t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e P l a n n i n g A u r h o r i t y ,d e t a i l e d p l a n s a n d p r o p o s a l s f o r t h e d ' i s p o s a lo f p r o c e s s w a t e r a n d w a s h i n g s f r o m t h e f a c t o r yb y s p r a y i r r i g a t j o n o v e r
' l a n d . T h e d e t a i I e d
p r o p o s a l s s h a l l s h o w , b y m e a n s o f d e t a i l e dd r a w i n g s , m a p s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , t h eb o u n d a r i e s o f t h e l a n d s a n d a r e a s o v e r w h i c he f f l u e n t s a r e t o b e s p r a y i r r i g a t e d ; l a y o u ta n d o f p u m p - h o u s e s ; h o l d i n g t a n k s ; p i p e I i n e sa n d s p r a y a p p a r a t u s a n d m e t h o d s o f o p e r a t i o n .T h e d e v e l o p e r s s h a l l b e r e s p o n s ' i b l e f o r e n s u r -i n g t h a t t h e i r r i g a t e d e f f l u e n t s s h a l l p e r c o i a t eo n l y t h r o u g h t h e s o i l o f t h e i r r i g a t i o n a r e a sa n d t h a t t h e i r r i g a t e d e f f l u e n t s s h a l I n o t f a l Iu p o n , o r e n t e r a n y d r a r n o r w a t e r c o u r s ed i s c h a r g i n g t o t h e L u n g R i v e r .T h e d e v e l o p e r s s h a l l , f o r t h i s p u r p o s e , s e a lo f f a l I e x i s t i n g d r a r n s w i t h i n t h e b o u n d a r i e so f t h e i r r i g a t i o n a r e a t o p r e v e n t d i s c h a r g e st o t h e L u n g R i v e r o r o t h e r w a t e r - c o u r s e sd i s c h a r g i n g i n t o t h e L u n g R i v e r .T h e d e v e ' l o p e r s s h a l I c o n s t r u c t a n d m a i n t a i np r ^ o p e r e m b a n k m e n t s a r o u n d t h e i r r i g a t i o n a r e at o p r e v e n t s u r f a c e r u n - o f f t o w a t e r - c o u r s e so u t s i d e t h e i r r i g a t e d a r e a s . T h e s u b - s o i Id r a i n s t o b e p r o v i d e d b 5 , t h e d e v e l o p e r s s h a l Ib e s o i a i d o u t a n d c o n s t r u c t e d t h a t t h e d i s -c h a r g e s f r o m t h e s e d r a i n s s h a l I b e c o l I e c t e dt o a s i n q l e p o i n t , b e f o r e d i s c h a r g e t o t h er e c e i v i n g w a t e r , g i v e n w i t h t h e c o n s e n t ,i n w r i t i n g , o f t h e P l a n n i n g A u t h o r i t y . A ni n s p e c t j o n c h a m b e r s h a I I b e b u i I t o n t h eo u t l e t d r a i n t o t h e r e c e i v i n a w a t e r o r t oe n a b l e t h e t a k i n g o f s a m p l e s . A m e t e ro r g a u g i n g d e v i c e s h a l I b e r n s t a l l e d i n t h ec h a m b e r t o m e a s u r e t h e r a t e o f f l o w f r o m t h ei r r i g a t i o n a r e a . T h e c h a m b e r a n d m e t e r o fg a u g i n g d e v j c e s h a l l b e t o t h e a p p r o v a l o ft h e P l a n n i n g A u t h o r i t y .
R E O U I R E I \ 4 E N T N 0 . 5 : T h e d e v e I o p e r s s h a I I ,b e f o r e d i s c h a r g i n g o r c a u s i n g , s u f f e r i n g o rp e r m i t t i n g t o b e d i s c h a r g e d t r a d e e f f l u e n tf r o m t h e d e v e l o p m e n t s p r e m i s e s i n t o t h er e c e i v i n g w a t e r o r s e w € r , c a u s e t o b ee l i m i n a t e d f r o m s u c h e f f I u e n t , d o y o f t h ef o l l o w i n q m a t t e r s w h i c h m a v b e c o n t a i n e dt h e r e i n , t h a t i s t o s a y
i o n i n e x c e s s o f 3 0 m o / li ) S o l i d s i n s u s p e n si i ) G r e a s e o r o i l .i i i ) P a t r o l o r a n 5 r i n f l a n r n r a b l e I i g h t o i I s .r v ) C a r b o n b r s s u l p h i d e , t r i c h l o r e t h y l e n e ,
a m y e a c e t a t e o r a n y o t h e r s i m i I a rs o l v e n t s .
Planning Reference: 5057 Series
Transcribed from a Copy of Part of the Original Planning Permission
REQUIREMENT NO.4: The developers shall submit,for the approval of the Planning Aurhority,detailed plans and proposals for the disposalof process water and washings from the factoryby spray irrigation over land. The detailedproposals shall show, by means of detaileddrawings, maps and specifications, theboundaries of the lands and areas over whicheffluents are to be spray irrigated; layoutand of pump-houses; holding tanks; pipe linesand spray apparatus and methods of operation.The developers shall be responsible for ensuring that the irrigated effluents shall percolateonly through the soil of the irrigation areasand that the irrigated effluents shall not fallupon, or enter any drain or watercoursedischarging to the Lung River.The developers shall, for this purpose, sealoff all existing drains within the boundariesof the irrigation area to prevent dischargesto the Lung River or other water-coursesdischarging into the Lung River.The developers shall construct and maintainproper embankments around tile lrrig3tion areato prevent surface run-off to water-coursesoutside the irrigated areas. The sub-soildrains to be provided by the developers shallbe so laidout and constructed that the discharges from these draIns shall be collectedto a sinale point. before dlscharge to thereceiving water, glven with the consent,1n writing, of the Planning Authority. Aninspection chamber shall be bUllt on theoutlet drain to the receIving water or toenable the taking of samples. A meteror gauging device shall be Installed in thechamber to measure the I'ale of flow from theirngat10n area. The chamber and meter ofgauging device shall be to tile approval ofthe Planning Authoritv.
REQUIREMENT NO.5: lhe developers sh~ll,
before discharging or cauSlng, sufferIng orpermittIng to be discharged trade effluentfrom the developments premIses lnto thereceiving water or sewer, cause to beeliminated from such effluent, any of thefollowing matters which may be containedtherein, that is to say:(i) Solids in suspension in excess of 30 mg/l.(i i) Grease or oi 1 .(iii) Patrol or any ,nflammable light oils.(i\') Carbon blssulphide, trichlorethylene,
amye aceta te or' any ot her 5 i mil arsolvent::.
Attachment 16
-==------~~
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
ATTACHMENT I2.8
Lagoon Quality
Date BOD
(ppm)
Phosphate (Ortho)
(ppm)
Ammonia
(ppm)
01/03/10 8.0 0.686 0.98
10/02/10 8.0 1.135 0.98
12/10/09 < 2.0 1.52 <0.286
07/09/09 < 2.0 1.662 <0.21
30/07/09 5.0 0.992 <0.01
22/06/09 12.0 0.783 <0.01
20/05/09 < 2.0 1.784 1.68
20/04/09 13.0 0.965 0.46
18/03/09 9.0 0.927 0.4
04/09/08 < 2.0 3.29 0.7
25/07/08 24.0 1.98 0.75
28/05/08 8.0 2.1 0.8
16/05/08 < 2.0 2.6 0.6
Outfall from Irrigation Lands: Nov – April = 124,851 m3
(See Aug. 2008 Report) May – Oct. = 35,762 m3
BOD
(ppm)
Phosphate (Ortho)
(ppm)
Ammonia
(ppm)
average ppm
over a 2-yr period
5.33 0.825 0.414
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
TD3o
o {( A \
l - lg jd .= ' lt 1{ io t3 l
I ' l
'n-oI
o-l
Nct.l
ooP.t(05o
Io i( D lg r io ta l
E I
o i5 1
l
I
oogf
=g)
o-{o3o-lo)c.to
(,
g!,
IAooi5Ioo
ao,3
EitTI
oI
=o=C'.l
oNNoI
oo99@
$o
1nryA!
n,V,t7qrr9-ffrb-naYe
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
9.09st~-e~~
\;,-~&\f~~·/).QJtD
0.00..11'==='
It[
l..l'>
=-'
=y
,...Y
"-
I
Fri01/01/201008:19:48
arneD
escription--
-S
caleR
angeest_D
rain_Te
mp
EffluentW
estDrain-T
emp,
0.00/100.00
31D
ays00:00:00
Sam
pleFreq.
00
:00
:30
-E
ng.U
nitsD
ecC
-----
Mon
01/02/201008:19:48
LastValue
23])5----
Ii-1I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
ooo
0)o.l
-lo3ooo)c-to
t(l1
J(,
)I\
(
l(
{
,na i'f
P
a)\t?'r<^/)w,\C-t
, \ rf , | / -
\l aOc>
-{> \r(t
vl
Ir-n
,{11v 'IV
G\./
J( 0 0? f t( o or ( t
oo
bol\t
loCD(.t
b,5
(.t
IG'(tt
|\':.1N
90qt
otto
{goorI
NNc'o(oo99(0$s
C^t
gAI
aC'ei5cti5o
r lr ii i ' l li i a
, l ( )l r J
r l OI t . r ,
Til E6 A r r
FotFi ti l lI t ( 0
l li ' G I tr l
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
c~,
\~2PJ,0
2~iJD0~
'SC)1Q~C-~~
Scale
Range
0.001100.00
-D
escription'-
-.
--
._,-
--
Effluent
We
stD
rainT
emp.
9'09'1I
O.O
OJ_
_._
._
---_
_-------------------------------------
Tue01/12/2009
08:19:4831
Days
00:00:00Fri
01/01/201008:19:48
-Sam
pleFreq.
,..--
EniU
nitsLastV
alue0'0:00:30
De
cC
23.05
arneesC
'Drain_T
emp
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
I( o o9 9( 0 0r c t
o l Dg , = it o o
df=.--1(D
3 t lo i i .
l i| \Cnl i ci l :
l i ol S
n c f ' =+ ( D
EH S;E IE, 3 con l r O
E99r : r - l-t; i 19O . .cs
i li l
Q; U,88-- it8zI g r
t ( O lr o l
ooof
€g)
o-{o3
r ( . li J
I i ga q ,o!
i 3 l o
lEr gi + ' i O; 19 . CD, ' l O. i o
r€rol c Lre ). Nr - l
N0 r ] \ )9 0/ oD ( OF. a
: . 1i c ti s. o
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
Wed
02/12/200908:19:48
LasfValue23.05
Eng.
Units
De
cC
-
31D
ays00:00:00
Sa-rnpieFreq.
00:o():30
Scale
Range
00
0/1
00
.00
--
Description
EffluentW
est
Drain
Tem
p.
Su
n01/11/2009
08:19:48
9.09
I
O'OO.l!~~~~~=
18.18
arneest_D
rain_Tem
p
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
I( o oo oi o br c t
{g
o
oNC'o(0(t99J(o.trCI'
Si Fic o .o o i: = .2 9fr 6'u r i = l
c l i Id i i5" i i- { l
9 i i
i i; !pi u)i
8 i 8 l--r i5-i8n '83( o l
i o i
=o)o{o3
(.t
trtAI
oc)Ictoi5o
i li it i
Et $o , I l:E.6 ( D i
r ' n io tI
i ii l: ;
ir i
o r mO 5 ro r ( o
l =
a .
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
9.09
LastValue
23.05
Eng.
Units
DecC~
·~5e·scription------~·--·-
Scale
Range
EffluEmtW
estDrainTemp~
-6
.00
/10
0.0
0--
0.00""1!
Thu01/10/2009
08:19:4831
Days
00:00:00S
un01/11/2009
07:19:48----Sampre~Freq
.~
--OO:()6:3b~~
arne-~.
._-est_D
rain_Tem
p
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
qt
bot\t
t\t\
oobo
(0
I(ocr,3.,ot$
N
N90
$,
3o Ioo
( D l(tt
l * io iI t i3 ' lt+,o l
: o i
{coo
o(oNC'o(0
o99(0Ea
o io lU , io i
E
6' l: t l
v,oo ) r6-rv lo r l= '(oo
oogJ
>
s,o.l--lo3
Eo.to)co
l
. ii , ( | tI l r
,oo u r 0 l9 o tI 3 i @
EB c:dl B; ' 1 0l i e
] l
, , ' T l. l a
, l Or l Ni l . -
(tlY hr ht: 6 06 * - c t
F (o
IFi Fi J (o. F
o
m ic. lo i=€ i( D la
(]tE if l
{q
o
ob lC t l
o io to io i
c r m( l ) fo r (ct i^ , l
5
o i
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
LastValue
23,05
Fri02/10/2009
08:19:48E
ng,U
nitsD
ecC
31D
ays00:00:00
.-SampleF-rE!q.··
.00:00:30
Scale
Range
0,001100,00
9.09
I
O'OO.JI~~~~~~
18.18
Tu
e01/09/2009
08:19:48am
e.--Description
.e-st-O
rain_Temp
EffluentW
estD
rainTem
p,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
E, 5p'; d'8., il= , i i
- l( D , ia i i6 l l
; i C l l!t
i a-F
; i or l l, l \
dg $I E i ( t-= - (oE5 ( to l i @0.i i -r=.i : coq ' 5J Oo
i ig', a',8 i 8 i: r d i8 t z i8 i 3 i
l ( o 'i o l
c)oo=
=g)
o-{o3-l
0)co
qr
o!,
aoIooiio
,,,[ r i3
E ii5-i-'|i- i
O i- o t
io lo i<r lO i( r iO l
j
( 0 0o o( 0 0i o
c, (ooo
o , mO r = 'o , ( o )- - c
r : t l
a
r {. C
o]o. l
or $ r g
3A I"'i Sr Elf . A
l . rr ( g
I , $crt
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
LastV
alue23.05
Tu
e01/09/2009
08:19:48-Eng~
Units
D
ec·C--
31D
ays00:00:00
Sa
mp
leF
req
.·--.
--60:00jo
Sat
01/08/200908:19:48
9.09
I
O.OO.JI~~~~~~
~--_...
-_._---_•.~
.•_--_
._-----_
._--_
..__._.-
arneD
escriptionS
caleR
angeest_D
rain_Te
mp
----.--
EffluenC
West-Drain-Tem
p.0.00/10-6:00
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
-a 0 0< > oa o br e
E l3 :o i
t€ot c Ll c )
P I Ei i {qFa' ct= r 05 t ( o
o99(os@
ooof
=o)o{o3
a!l
oI
ooNoo(oo99(056
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
9.09
ame
---'-.----._~-'-'.-'---
~,~
est_Drain_T
emp
31D
ays00:00:00
LastV
alue23.05
_.-.S
ample
Freq,~
-~
..-_.~--_
..-._-~
_.-_.~-
00
:00
30
-,.------,.---",-------,-.._.-Eng,
Units
-~~-
---
De
cC
Wed
01/07/200908:19:48
-De
scrlptlo
n----------
-----ScaleRange
·-Effl'u
en
TW
estD
rain
-tem
p,----
6,·001100,00
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
-( o o9 9( o ol o
q,
bot\,
!.tG'
gl5it('t
N
;.1N
(r,I90
(l,
9 : oc r oo ( 0
o t l D@ -
l _ : o
! t :='r+i( D l
3 lo i
=o=o
C'(ttNoor0o99(0
5cD
(fiooO r:ct i
6 ' i: t l
ooo= '(o=-
oo-{o3.(Jog)
co
(rt' l l
i i oo u , ! f9 o )9 3 0
o ( D i A
idi F: ' i Oi O
r lr 1
: ]u m ,( D 5c} i (oc ) -
l f lt a l
i
; i
{5
1 c 't o
I i N' r O' r - l
S iF i N^ a . c ta i l o
; ( o
iFi F] Jt 1 6
i 1 5l i C E
;m r+ 1c i|D: t i
o ia
trti8",J l
{ i( D r
3 ,p
l
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
Th
u02/07/2009
08:19:48'LastV
alue2
30
5
Eng.
Units
De
cC
31D
ays00:00:00
'---'.
Sam
pleFreq.-
-00:00:30
ScaleR
ange0.00/100.00
Description"-.
EffluentW
est
Drain
Tem
p.
Mo
n01/06/2009
08:19:48I
0.0
0.J
1--=
---:o-~~~~==
9.09
36.36
18.18
ame
estD
rainT
emp
I27.27
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
tl'v\T(D
mgra
' - {(Dfo_r-l6oF<
ctrl.
€
CI. Ecfo
: JU'
r€3'o_, o€
r(DE
lcrl$F_tr_fmlHImtH.nElwWWElsir
1\,
ts+|tuo
TI=.o,-ogtl
t\,ceCO
c!Tt\,]em
;etrg'
tncPePeo
@?
J
Cr,j
egl
h)oc(0o(trt\,{ct€
mDm
J
Dm'J
WImJ
:mil
mm
J·
~
Edit
Trend
Display
Utility
Options
Window
Help
PiillUm
rml~llt·!1
~I~I~I~~
~
_B
X
gm
]
ifEi]
mIiJ
~
IFri
01/05/200905:27:08
130D
ays00:00:00
~~
IS
un
31/05/200905:27:08
211041201014:24
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
oogf
€g)
o-lo3
o ( ooo
@tr=o
oG'Noo(oo99.l(o5CIt
r o ti r
r ioI 'S i €R 3 0
EE gid. F' 1 ( '
' l or iI
i l
1 l
=oo.o
o5Neo(0
o!9(oFo
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
9.09
Wed
01/04/200909:19:48
La
stV
alue23.05
Eng.
Units
Oe
cC
31D
ays00:00:00
Sam
pleF
req.-
00:00:30
Scale
Range
0.00/100.00
O.O
OJI
I
IS
un01/03/2009
08:19:48--
--,
._"
,._.-----.-
._
.._--
,,~-----
--~,
--
arneD
escriptionI
esCO
rain_Temp
EffluentW
estbrainTem
p,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
oogf
o)co
=q)
o-{o3
( D l D@ I
'oi 'd l= ' l
l l- { r( D i3 i
E r
j U'g=o
oNt9C'o(0o99J@
$q,
g lo iat, Io l--.1
E i
6 ' i=i
iAt,o io ) r6'7 it D iJ(o( D r
(,
tr,!t
ooIooiic,
C":o ' l31
t t l6- l-nl( D r- o i
o ioa5i9 i( t ro
l
g7; lTllO f , ic l r (o lo -
' : ) t, o :
.
t€I r ( Di r e; c ti i 5
i or Cel
3 [ F8v I
E(orei gi i ( o
5o
m l
c ;o tf j
€ lo i@ '
o i;i.i:J
{ i(Df
o i
9 iclo
o iO r
b io r
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
_-__._J
LastV
alue23',05·
Eng,
Units
Dec
CS
caleR
ange-_._-
~-_._~-'.'-
0,00/100,00
0.00-"1
Sun
01/02/200908:19:48
31D
ays00:00:00
Wed
04/03/200908:19:48
-'-~Sampfe'F-req.-----
---"~
.--.---
00
:00
30
9.09
27.27
18.18
ame----'------.--'_.-.-D
escription------
e·s'[Drain_T
emp·---
-.EffluentW
estD
rain-Temp,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
I( o o9 P(o ctr c t
c,boi,
{!e{
Ot3t(DF
(tlI('t(,t
(.)I&oot
t\,lrt\)
(ob(0
ot)o
9o
{:tcoJ
oI
Ncto(looSTN{iio
oogf,(o
0)o-lo3
Eo-l
oc-to
( D ; l D( ' i f
lu ' o
df rl r- {1o :3 i: o i
i
igr Fc . 1 1 no i o:t =.
2sfr 6 'glt f
9 ro , i5- i{ i( I ' !f l
E i
U,ql
(.tI
(tI
T\'oo(0o(tl
le{i5@
Cooling
Water
Temperature
100.00
90.91
81.82
72.73
63.64
54.55
45.45
36.36
27.27
18.18
Sa
t31/01/2009
05:27:08Last
Value
11.95
Eng.
Units
De
cC
30D
ays00:00:00
Sam
pleF
req
.'00:00:30
'
Description
Scale
Range
Effluent
West
Drain
Temp.
o.oohoo.oO
Th
u01/01/2009
05:27:08
9.09
I
O'OO.J!~~S~~~
9me
est-:"Drain_Tem
p
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
ATTACHMENT I2.10
River Lung: Ambient Monitoring
Date Ammonia
(ppm)
BOD
(ppm)
Nitrite/Nitrat
e
(ppm)
Phosphate
(Ortho)
(ppm)
Total
Phosphorus
(ppm)
Suspended
Solids
(ppm)
12/10/09 SW4
SW5
0.025
0.055
<2
<2
0.37
0.58
<0.01
<0.019
<0.031
0.044
3
4
09/09/09 SW4
SW5
0.04
0.14
<2
<2
0.47
<0.27
<0.01
<0.01
0.034
0.18
<2
<2
11/08/09 SW4
SW5
0.03
0.18
<2
<2
<0.27
0.66
<0.01
0.026
0.071
0.045
3
2
30/07/09 SW4
SW5
0.01
<0.01
<2
<2
0.46
0.54
0.012
0.017
0.072
0.042
2
2
22/06/09 SW4
SW5
0.02
0.15
<2
<2
0.18
1.73
0.009
0.118
0.078
0.163
2
3
20/05/09 SW4
SW5
0.06
0.04
<2
<2
0.11
0.35
0.014
0.008
0.038
0.039
<3
5
20/04/09 SW4
SW5
0.02
0.08
<2
<2
1.01
0.57
<0.005
<0.005
0.037
<0.027
<3
<3
18/03/09 SW4
SW5
0.01
0.35
<2
<2
0.67
0.28
0.012
0.009
0.021
0.024
<3
3
18/02/09 SW4
SW5
0.06
0.13
<2
<2
0.61
0.75
<0.004
0.005
0.014
0.032
5
<3
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
ATTACHMENT I2.11
Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Assessment of A Drainage Ditch Adjacent to Connacht Gold Shannonside Dairy plant and the River Lung,
Co. Roscommon
February 2010
Produced by
Aqua-Fact International Services Ltd
On behalf of
Mescal and Associates Consulting Engineers
February 2010
AQUA-FACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES ltd 12 KILKERRIN park TUAM rd GALWAY city www.aquafact.ie
tel +353 (0) 91 756812 fax +353 (0) 91 756888
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 4
2. Methodology ............................................................................................. 4
2.1 Kick sampling method ................................................................................ 4 2.2 The biological river quality classification system (Q-Scheme) .................... 6 2.3 Effluent and Temperature........................................................................... 7
3. Results ...................................................................................................... 7
4. Conclusions ............................................................................................ 10
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
1. Introduction
AQUAFACT International Services Ltd. was commissioned by Mescal and Associates
consulting engineers to carry out a macroinvertebrate assessment on a drainage ditch
situated next to Connacht Gold’s Shannonside dairy processing plant. It is intended to
discharge warm waste water from the plant into this ditch and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) requested that the area be surveyed prior to this.
The drainage ditch in question is situated at the co-ordinates: 53°54’01.39”N
08°33’46.94”W
The ditch was constructed approximately twenty years ago and its purpose was to
collect run off from adjacent stand by sprat irrigation area to ensure that excess nutrients
would not be introduced to the town stream which runs parallel to the ditch. The ditch
runs parallel to the River Lung and joins the river approximately 650 m east of the dairy
processing plant.
AQUAFACT undertook a freshwater biological assessment to discover the species of
macroinvertebrates present and to determine the effect that the waste water will have on
the ditch habitat. A two minute kick sample effort was made on three pre-determined
sites.
2. Methodology
2.1 Kick sampling method
Three sites were selected along the drainage ditch, These can be seen in Figure 1. A
standard pond net (mesh size 500µm) was used to retrieve the samples. Generally it
is best to choose riffled sections of a stream to sample using the kick sampling
method as these tend to contain a larger diversity of pollution sensitive fauna due to
the higher oxygen content. Normally the net is pointed towards the flow of the stream
and the sampler disturbs the stream bed with their foot up to a meter upstream from
the net, dislodging any macroinvertebrates in that area. The sampler moves
diagonally across the stream doing this until two minutes have elapsed. However at
this site there was either very little or no flow in the drainage ditch; therefore, sites
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
were selected as close to the predetermined areas as possible and the samples
were taken by actively sweeping the net through the weeds. The sampling time had
to be reduced from two minutes to one minute per site as the amount of mud on the
stream bottom meant that the nets filled rapidly and were no longer able to sample
effectively.
When sampling was complete, the contents of the net was washed and transferred
to a container. These were then brought back to the lab, washed through a 1mm
mesh and preserved in formalin.
Figure 1 Map showing location of three sample sites along Shannonside drainage ditch, Co
Roscommon
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
2.2 The biological river quality classification system (Q-
Scheme)
The Q-Scheme has been in use in Ireland since 1971. It has undergone a number of
modifications since then and has been included in the Local Government (Water
Pollution) Act, 1977 (Water Quality Standards for Phosphorus) Regulations 1998.
This assessment is routinely carried out by the EPA. The Q-Scheme divides benthic
macroinvertebrates up into five indicator groups according to their tolerance of
pollution, particularly organic pollution. Depending on the groups numerical
distribution in a sample, the overall quality of a water body can be determined.
The samples obtained at the Shannonside drainage ditch were returned to Aquafact
and analysed by a skilled freshwater biologist down to family/genus where possible
with the aid of a stereoscopic microscope, forceps and the relevant keys (see
references).
In order to determine the biological quality of a stream, the analyst must assign a Q-
index to each sample using the macroinvertebrates present. The Q-index is a quality
measurement for freshwater bodies that ranges from Q1 – Q5 with Q1 being the
poorest quality and Q5 being pristine/unpolluted (See Table 1)
Table 1: Relationship between biotic index and water quality
Biotic Index Quality Status Quality
Q5, 4-5, 4 Unpolluted Class A
Q3-4 Slightly polluted Class B
Q3, 2-3 Moderately polluted Class C
Q2, 1-2, 1 Seriously polluted Class D
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
2.3 Effluent and Temperature
The EPA’s handbook entitled “Parameters for Water Quality: Interpretations and
standards” (2001) lays down guidelines and highlights limitations which are placed
on effluents which are discharged into a natural aquatic environment.
This handbook also addresses the issue of water temperature in effluents. It states
that the temperature of the effluent must not exceed the unaffected waters (in this
case the River Lung) by more than 1.5°C and must not be above 21.5°C during the
period of 1st of November and 30
th of April, where species which need colder water
for reproduction are present.
The species of fish occurring in the River Lung include brown trout (Salmo trutta), eel
(Anguilla anguilla), pike (Esox lucius), bream (Abramis brama), roach (Rutilus
rutilus), tench (Tinca tinca), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), carp (Cyprinus
carpio) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) (URL 1). Of these only pike spawn between
November and April and need a water temperature of 8°C.
3. Results
Table 2 below gives the Q-Index results for the three sites sampled at the
Shannonside drainage ditch.
Table 3: Q-Index results for the Shannonside kick sample sites
Site Q-Index Quality Status
St.1 Q2-3 Moderately polluted
St.2 Q2-3 Moderately polluted
St.3 Q2-3 Moderately polluted
Species lists for all three sites can be seen in APPENDIX I.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
Figure 3: Photograph of St. 1. Typha latifolia and grass in the ditch.
Figure 4: Photograph of St. 2. Dead Phragmites sp. stalks and grass.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
Figure 5: Photograph of St. 3. Lemna sp. can be seen at either side of the stream.
The photographs above show the three sections of the ditch which were sampled. At the
time of the survey the ditch was frozen over and ice had to be broken before a sample
could be taken. More photographs of the survey area can be found in APPENDIX II.
The stream bottom at all three sites was composed of anoxic muds and methane gas
was released from the sediment of St. 1 upon disturbance. High numbers of Tubifex sp.
and Lumbriculus variegatus indicate an area which has been severely depleted in
oxygen. Large amounts of duckweed (Lemna sp.) were documented growing on the
surface of the sites.
The ditch is ca 650 m long, ca.1.5 m wide and 1.25 m deep on average. This gives a
volume of ca 1,200 m³ and the proposed volume of warm water is 6,000 m³ per day or
ca 70 l per second.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
4. Conclusions
The results of the kick sampling effort performed by AQUAFACT showed that the
drainage ditch adjacent to the Shannonside dairy processing plant suffered from
moderate pollution and scored a Q-index value of Q2-3 for all three sites sampled.
The area is low in oxygen as indicated by the abundance of Tubifex sp. and Lumbriculus
variegatus in the samples and the present of H2- rich anoxic sediments. Other
macroinvertebrate species present there in significant numbers included Asellus
aquaticus and Chironomus sp. as well as various molluscs such as Aplexa hypnorum,
Anisus vortex and Planorbis planorbis. All of these species are indicative of a poor
habitat. In a healthy water body at this time of year, samples should be yielding high
numbers of pollution sensitive species such as stoneflies and mayflies.
The introduction of warm water into this environment would mean that less oxygen
would be dissolved into the water. However, as the species present are ones which
thrive in polluted, low oxygen habitats this would not have any significant effects on
populations here.
If a significant effect was experienced by the macroinvertebrates in this habitat due to
the introduction of warm effluent water it would be considered acceptable as the original
purpose of the drainage ditch was to mediate the effects of pollution from the nearby
stand by spray irrigation area. The macroinvertebrate species present are both
widespread and common and their loss would not be significant as they are well
represented elsewhere. The drainage ditch should be treated as a buffer zone in this
respect and used as an area in which the effluent water can cool to acceptable levels
before being introduced to the River Lung system.
It is important however that the effluent discharged from the ditch to the River Lung does
not affect the river itself. The river is currently regarded as “at risk of not achieving good
status” in regards to the Water Framework Directive (URL 2) and any element which
could further jeopardise the rivers status should be avoided. This may require that the
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
temperature of the discharged water be monitored to ensure that it is an acceptable
temperature when it is being discharged into the River Lung. .
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
References
A.A Savage and T.T Macan, 1989. Adults of the British Aquatic Hemiptera Heteroptera
P.S. Croft, 1986. A key to the major groups of Freshwater Invertebrates
P. Ashe, J.P O’Connor & D.A Murray, 1998. A checklist of Irish Aquatic Insects
Gloer Peter, 2002. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands: Die Susswassergastropoden Nord und
Mitteleuropas (Die tierwelt deutschlands 73 teil)
Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Parameters of Water Quality: Interpretation
and standards
URL’s
URL 1 www.shannon-fishery-board.ie
URL 2 www.epa.ie
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
APPENDIX I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
JN1044 Connacht Gold (Ballaghadereen - Shannonside) species list from kick sample analyses
Station Collection date
St. 1 26/01/2010
Species Number
Asellus aquaticus 39
Ostracod sp. 110
Eiseniella tetraeda 13
Lumbriculus variegatus 305
Tipula sp. 21
Beetle larvae 24
Chironomus sp. 20
Aplexa hypnorum 38
Tubifex sp. 32
Anisus vortex 37
Eristalis sp. 1
Planorbis carinatus 9
Haliplus fulvus 1
Planorbis planorbis 14
Daphnia sp. 27
Caddis pupa 1
"Cyclops" water flea 16
Hydroporous sp. 5
Gammarus duebeni 7
Gammarus pulex 2
Dicranota sp. 4
Cataclysta lemnata 1
Colombella sp. 2
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:13
JN1044 Connacht Gold (Ballaghadereen - Shannonside) species list from kick sample analyses
Station Collection date
St. 2 26/01/2010
Species Number
Asellus aquaticus 344
Aplexa hypnorum 24
Lumbriculus variegatus 780
Chironomus sp. 402
Anisus vortex 19
Beetle larvae 7
Planorbis planorbis 33
Tubifex sp. 226
Planorbis carinatus 18
Helobdella stagnalis 17
"Cyclops" Water flea 31
Eiseniella tetraeda 12
Baetis atrebatinus 8
JN1044 Connacht Gold (Ballaghadereen - Shannonside) species list from kick sample analyses
Station Collection date
St. 3 26/01/2010
Species Number
Aplexa hypnorum 43
Tubifex sp. 257
Eiseniella tetraeda 5
Asellus aquaticus 18
Anisus vortex 22
Gammarus sp. 2
Haplotaxis gordioides 3
Gammarus duebeni 2
Planorbis planorbis 16
Chironomus sp. 2
Planorbis carinatus 4
Baetis atrebatinus 1
Chirosephalus diaphanus 1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
APPENDIX II
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
Plate 1: Pond area close to St. 1 with Phragmites sp. and Typha sp.
Plate 2: Pond area close to St. 1 with dead Phragmites sp.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
Plate 3: Wetland which makes up area North of the drainage ditch
Plate 4: Photograph of drainage ditch looking from East to West
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
Plate 5: Photograph of drainage ditch looking from West to East
Plate 6: Photograph of town stream which runs parallel to ditch
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
Plate 7: Shannonside Dairy plant with ditch to right of photo
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
1
CONNACHT GOLD – DISCHARGE TEMPERATURE
HEAT DISCHARGED
The following summarizes the position with regard to heated discharges from the
plant.
The process effluent from the plant gravitates from discharges throughout the plant to
the process sewer system. This, in turn, discharges to the WWTP. The heat contained
in the process sewerage dissipates in passing through the WWTP. The WWTP has a
retention period of several days. The treated effluent coming out of the WWTP is
below the licence limit of 25°C.
Heated process effluent discharging to the process sewer is largely limited to plant,
lines and tanker washings. It is not very significant in terms of the total heat load
discharged from the plant.
The bulk of the heat load results from condensate discharge and from cooling water
discharge. The condensate discharged to storm drain is that portion of the water
evaporated off the milk. Approximately 90% of milk is water. The evaporation is
done in what are referred to as ‘effects’. As milk is evaporated, the condensate from
the first effects are sent to the boiler for makeup water , the condensate from the
middle effects are discharged to surface water drain and the condensate from the later
effects can be directed to the process effluent if high conductivity is automatically
detected. The above very briefly summarizes the evaporation at Connacht Gold and
the process is similar to other dairy plants throughout Ireland and overseas.
The cooling water is used throughout for plant cooling. This cooling water is non
contact with the milk being processed. There is a large range of equipment throughout
using cooling water.
The cooling water and a large portion of the condensate are discharged to the surface
water drainage system. At Connacht Gold this gravitates to the ‘West Drain’. Most of
the heat to surface water drain is contained in these streams. This was confirmed in a
study carried on site a number of years ago at the plant.
The plant was examined again in 2009 to check for potential areas where the heat
being currently discharged from the plant could be reused economically in the plant.
This was investigated to identify any practical heat recovery that could be carried out
in the plant. The following areas were examined and a summary of the examinations
is as follows:
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
2
BOILER
The boiler is oil fired. It has capacity of 36,300 kg / hr steam. See attached Fig 4.
To make this steam it uses 0.52 kg water / kg steam. The maximum hourly
requirement is thus 18.8 m3/hr of water.
Part of this is provided as steam condensate return and addition of necessary softened
water from the mains supply.
The remaining part would typically be up to 10 m3/hr of water. This is supplied by
returning part of the total 50 m3/h condensate to the boiler.
It is done by directing the condensate from the evaporator area across to the
condensate tank located in the Service Area.
HOT WATER USE AND DISCHARGE IN THE PLANT
Throughout the plant warmed water is provided by locally controlled steam addition
to cold water for temperature control. There is neither storage, nor a separate water
supply system, for heated water. To use up excess heat contained in the hot discharge
it would be necessary to provide both storage and a separate water supply system. The
majority of the applications for hot water would further not be suited to direct use of
condensate for hygiene reasons. This would necessitate using heat exchange to
additional cold water supplied.
All cleaning hot water discharges, whether they are CIP controlled or manually hose
operated, go to the process drains. The heat is necessary to meet the various cleaning
requirements. The quantities of process effluent discharged from the individual
process areas throughout the plant are shown on Fig 5/1. This work was carried out in
the mid nineties. The quantities discharged are reduced since then and there are some
process alterations that would change this but not to a significant degree. It is shown
here to give the reader a good idea of where water is discharged to the process drain.
It does not indicate anything regarding the effluent temperature. It should be noted
that the heat load in the process effluent does not give difficulty at the final discharge
where the limit is 25°C. Consequently heat is not of significance in the process
effluent.
Heat can be of significance in the SW2 discharge. The bulk of this heat arises from
the milk evaporation and comes from the plant in the form of hot condensate and
heated cooling water. Other plant discharges to SW2 are present but are small in
terms of heat loss relative to the condensate and cooling water.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
3
OVERVIEW OF REUSE OF HEAT IN COOLING WATER AND CONDENSATE
DISCHARGES
It should be noted initially that this heat is unavoidable. An essential part of the
evaporation process is boiling off water from skimmed milk and condensing the
vapours in preheating incoming skim. This use of boiled off water to heat up skim
feed together with the increased pressure of operation results in condensate coming
off at the order of 50°C. In addition the entire processing operation requires a large
amount of high energy pumping. This requires a constant high flow of cooling water
to the system. This cooling water is pumped to the process area. There it takes up the
heat from various operations, particularly the evaporators, and is discharged to drain
at elevated temperature. This water is not in direct contact with the skim milk. It is
however much less useful in considering heat return as its temperature is considerably
lower than the condensate.
A number of potential areas in the plant for reuse of the heated water were considered.
This concluded that the only areas of viability were the lorry wash and the casein
plant. These two are referred to in some detail in the next section. Domestic water
heating and space heating for the office and reception areas was also considered.
These were less attractive in terms of capital recovery. They are also referred to later.
The in automated plant CIP (clean in place) washings throughout generally use 80°C
water. This is considerably warmer than the condensate and cooling water which
would make for very complex hot water supply to incorporate them. The condensate
is warmer but still well below 80°C. More importantly the condensate could not be
used for final CIP of plant items. There would also be considerable concern for
hygiene reasons in using the cooling water. In terms of the quantity , the volumes of
heated water used in the CIP of the various plants is only a fraction of the condensate
and cooling water quantity discharged from the plant. This is evident from the
discharged quantities shown on Figure 5/1. Overall the use of condensate as hot
water to CIP would be limited and the use of cooling water would not be hygienically
acceptable.
POTENTIAL REUSE AREAS
Lorry Wash Area for External Hot Water Hosing
Condensate could be used for external washing in this area. Typically the total volume
of heated water used for external washing here is approximately 50 m3/d in season.
This is at approximately 70°C. This water could be supplied via the Condensate
Tanks on the Service Area side. It would be necessary to provide a smaller washing
tank complete with automated steam addition to raise the temperature. This then
would be fed with a new line from the Condensate Tanks on the Service Area side
with suction out to power hose side.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
4
The use of condensate would be approximately 50 m3/d.
The saving in heated water is approximately 50 m3/d x 30°C = 5.4 mBTU /d
@ 3412 BTU / kWh gives 1582 kWh @ 3.9 c / kWh gives €61 /d.
for 150 days gives € 9150 / y saved on fuel cost.
The cost of providing the facility is as follows:
Extension of steam lines and controls of local temperature 5
Tank 50 m3 complete with insulation and safety facilities 15
Condensate feed line from existing Condensate Tank at Service Area 3
Discharge hosing arrangement and control 2
Miscellaneous 5
---
€30 K
The above would reduce daily heat to drain by less than 5% and the return period for
the investment is 3.3 years.
Separate Washwater Supply at the Casein Plant
When in use the Casein Plant uses up to approximately 70 m3 /d of floor washwater.
This is typically at 70°C. A local separate tank could be provided which would take
condensate, subject to hygiene conditions. . Assume that whatever it takes can
increase temperature by 30°C. It would be necessary to provide an insulated water
tank with automated steam addition to heat to 70°C. This would then be fed with a
new line from the evaporator area for the reused hot water which would entail
pumping. The discharge side of the new tank would be to power hose.
The daily heat reused calculates at 7.6 m BTU’s which saves €85 /d.
The Casein plant over the last number of years has run for approximately 80 days on
average in the year. The long investment return period in this case is due to the
current low market for casein which results in a much reduced no of days of operation
The annual saving would be €4250 /y.
The cost of providing the facility would be some €15K more than that outlined for the
Lorry Wash facility because of the additional on the transfer of the Condensate or the
cooling water from the evaporation area and because of the larger tank. Thus the cost
would be €45K.
The above would reduce daily heat to drain by less than 5% and the return period for
the investment is 10.6 years.
.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
5
Office and Reception Building Heating
Consideration could be given to providing a heating system complete with internal
radiators throughout both the office and the reception building.
This would use the Condensate as it is at the highest temperature. The condensate
taken at 50 to 60°C is not sufficiently high for use in conventional hot water radiator
heating. It would be necessary to augment the heat prior to circulation and to
incorporate this into new heating systems.
Both of the above are single storey structures. The office which is the front part of the
original structure was built some 35 years ago is some 350 m2. The Reception
Building is recent and is some 200 m2. Approximation of the total heating required
based on 4.5 BTU’s / ft3 is 100 kW. This requirement would be readily provided by
the condensate.
This work would entail transfer pipework for the condensate to the 2 areas together
with integration to the existing systems complete with control. The work would also
entail tying in the existing hot water source to give adequate elevated temperature to
the hot water circulated in the existing system to function properly in heating the
existing space. In addition the supply of condensate to the system is only available in
the processing period of the year and the 18 hr in 24 hr availability of the condensate
would have to be accommodated. A very approximate estimate for this work complete
is €70K.
Assuming some 75 of the 100 kW requirements can be met using the condensate this
would reduce the use of the existing source. Based on the existing source as steam
from the boiler the annual cost saving is calculated as follows:
75 kW x 4000 hrs/y = 337,500 kWh @ 3.9c /kWh = €13,200.
The above would reduce the overall heat to drain by less than 5% and the return
period for the investment is 5.3 years.
DISCHARGE TO SW2
Additional Cooling Used
Currently when the plant is in operation it needs to utilize its full volume of cooling
water complete to maintain adequate discharge temperature. The pumping of this
additional cooling water has significant cost.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
6
Cooling Tower
Provision of a cooling tower on the discharge to the West Drain was considered on a
number of occasions.
The cooling tower location considered was at the head of the West Drain.
This work would entail considerable civil and plant work together with new high
volume pumps and fans.
The cost would be the order of €100 to €150K.
.
The energy use in running this cooling tower would be approximately 25 kW for the
submersible pumps feeding and for internal fans in the towers.
This would amount to an annual cost of 25 kW x 4000 hrs /y x € 0.15 kWh =
€15,000/y.
There would be no financial return for this investment.
Coupled with this there would constant tonal noise and very markedly increased water
vapour emission from this part of the site.
Long Outfall via Backfield
Modification to the existing outfall pipework can be carried out. This will enable the
drainage pipe currently taking the West Stream route to be brought across the Town
Stream to the former irrigation field. The existing 0.7 km long open drain around the
side of the former irrigation area will be used to allow maximum natural cooling to
the discharge prior to outfall to the Lung. The discharge temperature will satisfy the
licence requirement.
Attached is Dwg No 0902/0 ‘Cooling Water Outfall Detail’ showing the new
pipework and the Town stream crossing.
Attached also is Dwg No 0903/0 ‘Outfall - Overall Site Plan’ showing the Western
Drain complete out to the River Lung.
The cost of doing this is limited to pipework cost and there is no pumping or other
ongoing costs associated with it.
The EPA has requested a study of the condition of this drain to be carried out.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
7
SUMMARY
Heat required is provided to the plant from the oil fired steam boiler.
The steam is piped to the various points of use within the plant.
The application of the steam is automated throughout the process plant.
The return of hot condensate to the boiler is already being done. It has a limited
impact only on the heat lost to drain. This is because the quantity of water that the
boiler takes in is small.
There are 3 other areas wherein the reuse of hot discharge is assessed. They are as
follows with their investment return periods:
- Lorry Wash …. €30K @ 3.3 yrs return
- Casein Plant …..€45K @ 10.6 yrs return
- Office Heating ..€75K @ 5.3 yrs return
At present the discharge temperature is maintained by additional water pumping.
Provision of a Cooling Tower would cost €100 to €150K with annual expenditure
€15K.
There would be no financial return from a cooling tower.
Take the drainage in the Western Stream across the Town Stream by gravity and
discharge it to the 0.7 km open outfall drain to cool on its passage to the River Lung.
This has no continuous cost associated with it and is thus the most economical way to
satisfactorily meet the discharge temperature requirements.
-----------------------
Michael Mescal of Mescal & Associates
for Connacht Gold
22/12/09
Attachments:
- Dwg No 0902/0 ‘Cooling Water Outfall Detail’
- Dwg No 0903/0 ‘Outfall -Overall Site Plan’
- Fig 2 /1 Original Heat Source Survey
- Fig 4 /1 Steam Boiler
- Fig 5 /1 Summary of Effluent Survey
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
ATTACHMENT I2.12
8
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:19:14