03 PPP TTE VLS AND API 510

53
© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd INSPECTING PRESSURE VESSELS (INCLUDING API 510)

Transcript of 03 PPP TTE VLS AND API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

INSPECTING PRESSURE VESSELS (INCLUDING API 510)

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Try this

What are the major design differences between these two

vessels ?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Vessel design

Design has an effect on:

• Where the greatest stresses are

• Which locations are most critical for defects

• Key areas for inspection

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Key design issues related to inspection

1.Shell stresses2.Head/shell ‘discontinuity’ stresses3.The principles of compensation4.Shell distortions

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Shell stresses

1

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

2 basic sets of assumptions:

Thick shell assumptions(mainly headers)

Thin shell assumptions (just about everything else)

Membrane theory (easy)

Lame equations(more complex)

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

So,membrane theory is the main one of relevance for inspectors

This assumes that

a vessel shell is

2-dimensional

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Shell welds

Which weld is the most critical and why?

Longitudinal

Circumferential

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Shell stresses

This is why longitudinal welds are type ‘A’ in ASME V111

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

The evidence

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Head-to-shell stresses

2

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

The head/shell joint

P

How is the shell

trying to deform?

What effect is the

head having

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

The result is:

HERE

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

What affects the size of the head/shell

discontinuity stress?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Discontinuity stresses

Types of head:Ellipsoidal,Torispheroidal

Note the a:b ratio

What is this for?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

How far down the shell do the discontinuity stresses

extend?

?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

3Compensation

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Compensation is needed because vessels have openings

The opening reduces the

strength of the shell

By how much?10%?20%?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

So, compensation needs to be added to restore the shell

strength

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

2 different types of compensation

Use a thicker nozzle

and/or a thicker shell

Use a compensation pad

on the shell

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Method

© Matthews Engineering Training LtdImportant area

Pad-type

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Example:Pad type

Note small width of pad

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

What type is this?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Which type?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

What about this one?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

The effect of nozzle diameter ?

d<D/3 d>D/3

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

From an inspection viewpoint:

Defects on welds on ‘large nozzles’are more ‘significant’

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Examples

Self-reinforcing nozzle :large diameter

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

This one?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

44

Shell distortions

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Out of roundness

OOR produces large

increases in

membrane stresses owing to bending

Typical limits

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

OOR example

What would you conclude about this vessel ?

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Vessel codes have tight limits on other types of shell

distortions

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Other design Other design limitslimits

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Basic vessel design:Summary

• Why is a little bit of design knowledge important in inspection?

• Where are the highest stress levels likely to be in a pressure vessel?

• Which are generally the ‘most critical’ welds

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

API 510

PRESSURE VESSEL

INSPECTION CODE

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

THE PURPOSE OF THE STANDARD IS, BASICALLY:

To fit in with the philosophy of ASME 1 and V111 For activities relating to:

Maintenance inspection Repair Alteration

and re-rating

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

THE US-BASED ‘FAMILIES’ OF CODESComponents

Storage Tanks

Power Boilers

Unfired Vessels

Piping Systems

Valves Pressure Relief Valves

Construction codes (i.e. manufacture only)

API 620 API 1650

ASME 1 ASME VIII-1

ASME B31-1ASME B31.3

ASME 16.34API 600-609

ASME 1ASME VIIIAPI 2000‘In-

service’ codes (covering inspection, repair, and re-rating)

API 653

-

API 510

API 570

API 598API RP 591

API RP 576

‘Support’ technical documents

API 651API 652API RP 575

ASME RP-573ASME II, V, VI, IX

ASME B16.5API RP 572ASME II, V, IX

ASME II, V, IXAPI RP 574

API RP 574ASME V, X

ASME PRC 25API 527ASME V, IX  API RP 579 ‘Fitness for service’

API Guides for Inspection of Refinery Equipment (IRE)

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

SO, MUCH OF THE CONTENT OF API 510 IS DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO:

ASME vessels

(and the specific way that they are designed ,

manufactured and certified By the AI),BUT IT CAN BE USED FOR OTHER

VESSELS ALSO

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

THE SCOPE OF API 510

Vol>0.141 m3 and P>250 psig

Vol>0.042 m3 and P>600psig

P=design pressure (not working pressure)

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

CORROSION AND MINIMUM THICKNESS EVALUATION

API 510 concentrates on

assessing corrosion in regions of circumferential

stresses

WHERE ARE THESE AREAS IN A VESSEL

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

WHAT ABOUT REAL VESSELS WITH NOZZLES?

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

AREAS WITH NOZZLE OPENINGS

The averaging must be done within

the reinforcement limits

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training LtdImportant area

REINFORCEMENT LIMITS

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

‘WIDELY SCATTERED PITS’ CAN BE IGNORED AS LONG AS :

20 cm DIA

2)Total pit area<45 cm2

1)Sum of dimensions along any straight line<5cm

3)<t/2 (excl corrosion allowance)

t

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

WHAT ABOUT THIS?

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

A year-interval

Maximum period between on-stream inspections

= the smaller of:

½ the remaining life of the vessel (based on corrosion rate)

Or

10 Years

10 API

SPECIFIES:

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF CORROSION RATE IS USED:

Remaining life (years)=Thickness(actual)-Thickness (minimum)Corrosion rate (mm/year)

Excluding the design corrosion allowance

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

WHAT API 510 CONSIDERS AS ‘LOW RISK’ VESSELSCorrosion history has been tracked for 5 yearsVessel not in creep rangeVessel not subjected to Hydrogen damage from the process fluidVessel is not strip or plate-lined

ON-STREAM INSPECTIONS ALLOWED(with UT thickness measurements)

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

Low risk vessels

Higher-risk vessels

15 years or 2/3 remaining ‘corrosion-rate life’

10 years or ½ remaining‘corrosion-rate life’

A general acceptance that on-stream inspections can be used

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

IF A VESSEL IS MOVED OR ITS USE CHANGED:

API 510 specifies that an inspection needs to be done

(but the extent of this inspection is up to the user)

API 510

© Matthews Engineering Training Ltd

SUMMARY:SO: API 510:

Specifies principles of vessel inspections……...BUT…….leaves many

technical decisions to the inspector

API 510 is not

particularly definitive by itself