Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 1

The Role of Scientific Experts in Writing a Good Public Health Research Grant

Proposal

Dr. Nancy Agens, Head,

Technical Operations, Pubrica

sales@pubrica.com

In Brief

Research Proposal Writing is the most

outstanding dream for people who love to

becomethe best in their research studies,

which are initiatedwith the best research

proposals. Public health research is not easy,

but an essential need that no nation can afford

to ignore'. A broad range of people should

accomplish public health research. Mainly, our

technical team proudly supports the research

scholars in adopting an appropriate high-

quality research proposal writing, scientific

journal editing according to their will.

Keywords: Scientific journal editing,

scientific manuscript editing services, medical

editing services, best scientific manuscript

editing services, academic paper editing

services and scientific paper translation,

editing services for a research paper, medical

editing companies, academic paper editing,

manuscript editing services.

I. INTRODUCTION

Public health research can and should bea

desire by a wide range of people. Even if they

do not plan theirresearch themselves, they

need to catch the principles of the scientific

method to understand the rate and control of

science andable to determine and calculate

results of the study before implementingthem.

This scientific paper translationdirectto

highlight the fundamental concepts to the

students and beginning researchersand inspire

the readers to access the enormous literature

available on research methodologies.

II. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH

Public health is designed to be about the health

of people, as the dispute to individual health -

it is everyone's duty. The approach of public

health is not different and has changed over

the years due to development in the health

status of the people and certain situations of

health. This definition of public health is

directly associated to the broader definition of

health, found in the preamble of the

constitution of the World Health Organisation

(1948), where health is referred to as "A state

of complete physical, mental and social well-

being and not merely the absence of disease.

III. RESEARCH GRAND PROPOSAL:

SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS

Start with a Good Problem:

Good problems lead to the right questions,

which request the scientific activity,it should

be analytical or applied, quantitative or

qualitative. The equitable of a research project

is always to answer those questions. This

sequence of the problem–question–purpose

should be accurate as your thesis. Clarity,

evidence, and a short dissertation will allow

you to develop a project and a convincing

grant proposal. It will leave your reviewers

with something to remember after reading all

of the many other challenging suggestions.

Design to Deliver

The specific research activities and

methodologies that you will undertake should

be very carefully designed and organized to

implant confidence in your reviewer that you

can deliver on your researches.To be clear

about what you will do when, how, and with

what resources, you should as a matter of

practice always include a separate section

Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2

called “project design” where you identify the

specific activities needed to carry outestablish

your resource plan.

Achieve and Communicate Coherence

While writing each part of the description,

completing the budget, putting together your

biographical sketch, and compiling all of the

other parts of the research proposal, you

should seek for integrity among all of the

elements. While you will not be able to

eliminate all possible contradictions from any

text, the idea is to create a complete package

that minimizes a sense of the disjointed.

IV. ELEMENTS OF THE GRANT

PROPOSAL

Title: It should be concise and descriptive. It

must be informative and catchy. A compelling

title not only grabsthe reader's interest but also

incline him/her favourably towards the

proposal. Often claims are stated in terms of a

functional relationship because such titles

indicate the independent and dependent

variable. The title may need to be improved

after the integration of writing of the protocol

to reflect more closely the sense of the study.

Abstract: It is a synopsis of generally 300

words. It should comprise the main research

question, the motivation for the study, the

hypothesis and the method. Explanation of

theprocess may consist of the design,

procedures, the sample and any instruments

that will be used.It should attain on its own,

and not invoke the reader to points in the

project description

Introduction: The introduction provides the

readers with context information. It desires to

establish a structure for the research so that

readers can figure out how it relates to

anotherstudy. It should explain the question of

why the research demand to be made and what

will be its purpose. It establishes the proposal

in context

Objectives: Research purpose are the goals to

be obtainedby conducting the research.They

may be stated as broad and specific ranges.

There are some best scientific manuscript

editing servicesavailable to understand the

research proposals.

Variables: Through the planning stage, it is

essentialto identify thecriticalvariables of the

study and their method of analysis and unit of

frequency must be indicated.

Questions and hypotheses: If you, as a

researcher, know enough to predict what you

are studying, then the interpretation may be

formulated. A thesis can be characterized as

anunsettled indicator or evidence of the bond

between two or more changeable. In other

words, the hypothesis convertsthe problem

statement into anactual, accurate prediction of

expected outcomes. Suggestions are not meant

to be haphazard guesses but should reflect the

depth of knowledge, imagination and

experience of the investigator

Methodology: The method section is

significant because it tells your research

Committee on how you plan to implement

your research problem. The guiding

convention for writing the Methods branch is

that it should containadequateinformation for

the reader to regulate whether the

methodology is reflected. Some even contend

that a good research proposal should

provideenough details for another qualified

researcher to implement the study.

Results & Discussion

Present the results of the paper, in a rational

order, using tables and graphs as mandatory.

Analyse the results and show how they help to

answer the research questions posed in the

introduction. Data does not explain itself; the

products must be presented and then

explained.

V. CONCLUSION

Broadly the research proposal must send the

following questions in any case of your

research area and the methodology you

choose: What you plan to achieve, why do you

want to do it and how it will act as an account

of drawback that iscovering in instant research

field may list. As well as, one leading problem

which is most applicable andexciting to the

scholar’s research area is selected. At the same

time, the issues can be resolved by proposing a

Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2

novel,academic paper editing services and innovative medical editing services

Fig 1. Grant Writing Process

REFERENCES

1. Ong P. How to write a research proposal. International

network on Personal meaning. It was accessed on June

18, 2008.

2. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. On line learning centre with

power web. Accessed June 18, 2008.

3. Pajares F. Elements of proposal 2007. It was accessed on

June 18, 2008.

4. P. Grant is writing as a funding source and collaborative

endeavour. Coll Stud Aff J. 2006; 25:199–208

Rosenzweig JS, Van Deusen SK, Okpara

O, Datillo PA, B rig gs W M, B irk hah n R H.

Authorship, co llaborat ion, and predictors of

extramural funding in the emergency medicine

literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:5–9.

41 Harper FD. Writing research reports

and scholarly manuscripts for journal

publication: Pitfalls and promises. J Negro

Educ. 2006;75:322–34