The Economics of Gender
description
Transcript of The Economics of Gender
![Page 1: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Economics of Gender
![Page 2: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Gender vs Sex
• Sex: perbedaan secara biologis– Laki-laki vs perempuan
• Gender: Characteristics as attributed that are socially associated with being female and male– Feminine– Masculine
![Page 3: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is economics of gender ?
• Interaksi agen ekonomi dalam keluarga, perusahaan dan pasar, sebagai laki-laki dan perempuan berbeda.
• Hal ini dipelajari dalam economics of gender
![Page 4: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Seringkali Keliru
Contoh:• – Angka Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Menurut
Gender seharusnya menurut sex (jenis kelamin)
• – Upah Pekerja Industri Manufaktur Menurut Gender ? Padahal kita hanya menyajikan statistik laki laki dan perempuan.‐
![Page 5: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Kajian Gender yang Benar
• Kajian mengapa Angka Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Perempuan selalu lebih rendah dari laki‐laki?
• Jawab: karena budaya patriarki bahwa laki‐laki bekerja di luar rumah, perempuan di dapur dan mengurus anak
![Page 6: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What is Gender Economics ?
• Menerangkan bagaimana perbedaan gender (gender differences) sbg pelaku ekonomi menghasilkan perbedaan keluaran ekonomi (economic outcomes) terhadap masing‐masing jenis kelamin
• Ukurannya ?
![Page 7: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ukuran yang Digunakan
Ukurannya:– Pendapatan, penghasilan, tingkat kemiskinan,
jumlah jam kerja dsb.– Dan ukuran lain yang dipakai para ekonom
untuk menentukan kesejahteraan ekonomi laki laki dan‐ perempuan (alokasi waktu lk vs pr).
![Page 8: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Is Economcs Gender Blind ?
• Is macroeconomic policy gender blind?• They persue aggregate goals, blind to
differential impacts on all individuals– Gender – Sector– Location
![Page 9: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Isu Gender dalam Economi
1. Pelaku ekonomi di masyarakat dapat laki laki‐ atau perempuan
2. Mereka berinteraksi dalam keluarga, perusahaan maupun pasar.
3. Dua hal ini harus dipelajari dalam ekonomi gender untuk dapat dikatakan valid
![Page 10: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Gender Blind
• The omission of gender concerns:– Generates policy with inefficienct macro level
outcomes– Give unpredicted micro level consequences for
women, children and families.
• So what ?
![Page 11: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Isu Gender
• Kesetaraan Gender yaitu kesetaraan dalam akses, partisispasi, kontrol dan manfaat.
• Sehingga: terjadi kesetaraan hak di dalam segala sendi kehidupan
![Page 12: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Di masyarakat kita selalu bertanya mengapa laki laki‐ dan perempuan selalu berbeda dalam kegiatan ekonomi? Pdhl lk maupun pr adalah pelaku ekonomi
• Mengapa pendapatan perempuan selalu lebih rendah dari laki laki?‐
![Page 13: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Mengapa banyak terjadi sex segregation dalam pekerjaan,dan apa akibatnya terhadap perbedaan pendapatan?
• Apakah peningkatan jumlah perempuan dalam pasar kerja menyebabkan peningkatan tabungan rumah tangga, meningkatkan household autonomy, atau perceraian atau jumlah anak sedikit?
![Page 14: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Perspektif Ekonomi Gender
• Pendekatan ekonomi yang menerangkan perbedaan perbedaan gender.‐
• Prinsip ekonomi:– Pengambilan keputusan dalam kelangkaan sumber
daya (Decision making under constraints scarcity)‐– Bhw manusia itu selalu bertindak rasional, yi:
• Konsisten: bertindak sama dlm situasi yg sama• Visioner: mempertimbangkan efek ke depan,jangka
panjang dan dampak tak langsung dari tingkah laku mrk.
![Page 15: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Tetap Gunakan Prinsip Ekonomi
• Scarcity, sumber daya terbatas vs keinginan tidak terbatas
• Opportunity cost, biaya kesempatan yang hilang
• Marginal benefit vs marginal cost• Marginal utility• Market :
– konsep penawaran (supply) dan permintaan(demand) dalam pasar (termasuk pasar kerja)
![Page 16: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Gender Bias in the Economic Theory
• Sen (1990), suggested perception of roles and relative value may influence allocation resources within the household.
• Discrimination suggested that perception of both women and employers affect wage determination in the market (Bruce, 1989)
• Blinkers occure! What is these blinkers?
![Page 17: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in Economic Theory
1. Boundary Blinkers• Invalid assumption about the nature and
importance of boundary between the household and market is boundary blinkers (gender blind)
• Boundary blinkers, failure to correctly specified the “base populartion” for the measurement of economic activity.
![Page 18: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• Consequences:– Movements of productive activities from
household to market are intepreted as an increase in production because the basis for comparison is not the total universe of economic activity (only monitise)
• Taking account this problem:– New household economics (NHE): time allocation
![Page 19: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in Economic Theory
• Clearly seen in:– National accounting system– Measurement of economic growth• Transfer from household production is invisible
• Result of boundary blinkers:– Disinvestments in human resources, as efficient: transfer
burden from public sector (out of monetise economy)– Burden falls to household where real but nonmonetise cst
becomes convieniently invisible– This: false impression of net efficiency gain for both public
sector and economy as a whole
![Page 20: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in Economic Theory
2. Measurement BlinkersIs to take account accurate recognition of women’s contribution to economic preoduction due to under enumeration of their participation in the labor force.
Simple Microec theory asume work or not decision is only about allocation of time between work or leisure
![Page 21: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• Men and women have different activities, women also bear primarily responsibility for biological and social reproduction.
• Men: devide time between mutually exclusive activities
• Women: engage multiple an concurrent activities (biological reproduction and child care: continual and large demand demands of time)
![Page 22: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• GDP, doent measure women and men’s contribution, the lower the FFP for women, the lower the contribution and no particular importance.
• Women’s contribution are overlooked and underenumerated (contribution to wealth and welfare of their family and community)
![Page 23: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
3. The Specification ProblemProblem arise from the failure of conventional
economics to identify and take to account the opportunity cost of women’s time.
Opprtunity cost of working includes:child care, domestic work, community activities.
Nonmarket activities: treated as costless and ignored, it is unpriced resource.
![Page 24: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• The key is to use opportunity cost of nonmonetise activities.
• Women’s domestic activities, create human capital (health and education and quality of future generation) therefore contribute to economic production
![Page 25: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
4. The efficiency ProblemFocus in microec: allocative efficiency, defined
by pareto criterion.Pareto optimum: situation which not posibble to
change allocation of resources without making someone worse off.
At macro level: short term static allocative efficeincy is achieved when it is imposible to rearrange resources to increase total output
![Page 26: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• Dynamic allocative efficiency: Long term resource allocation
• Effect gender bias:– Acts as subsidy, unpaid household inputs are unpaid
the true value– Women’s unpaid family labor subsidised economic
preoduction generally– Unequal acsess on control of resources.– Inability to move between jobs, and to search higher
returns, lack the incentives for HH to provide complementary physical capital or technology to raise women’s labor productivity
![Page 27: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
– Value of women’s reproductive role undervalued– Lower lifetime earnings, lead to no incentive to
undertake human capital investment among women5. Contextual BlinkersIs blinked to the economic significance of social and
institutional context in which economic activity takes place.
Neglect the role: families, households, social and cultural norms, conventions and institutions. (important for women)
![Page 28: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• Family and household considered as moral economy: individual decision to max utility
• NHE, individuals operate using shadow price• Values, attitudes, social conventions, behavioral
norms and cultural mores are overlooked• Neoclassical economic theory assume: agents
behave in fundamentally similar ways. Do they? They differ by norm, cultural and society values
![Page 29: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Blinkers and Problems in the Economic Theory
• This blinker: made owmen to be ignored by social and institutions.
• Contextual blinkers: blind fact that social conventions are another source of allocative inefficiency, restricting free movement of female resources to their most productive use.
• By increasing social and psychological cost and reducing the benefit of market work for women.
![Page 30: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Gender Differentiated Impact of Macroeconomic Policy
• Affect household through income, prices of goods consumed, access to public goods amd household participation in production and work.
• SR: effects depend on role in household• LR: effects human capital formation, will
change incentives or capacity to undertake longrun investments
![Page 31: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Konsep dasar perbedaan laki laki dan‐perempuan dlm ekonomi
• Memakai ukuran ukuran tentang pendapatan, ‐penghasilan, partisipasi angkatankerja, tingkat kemiskinan, pembagian waktu rumah vs pasar kerja dll
• Kajian tentang tren perubahan antar waktu memberikan ilustrasi pemberdayaan peremp.
• Dan mencari latar belakang terjadinya mengapa terjadi perubahan: mis. perubahan setting organisasi kemasyarakatan yg menyebabkan terjadinya perbedaan gender dlm semua aspek ekonomi
![Page 32: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Berapa Banyak Laki-laki dan Perempuan Bekerja
• Diukur dengan Angka Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja (Labor Force Participation Rate).
• Bekerja = melakukan kegiatan untuk upah, gaji atau keuntungan (uang atau non uang)‐
• Menganggur= tidak bekerja tetapi sedang mencari pekerjaan
![Page 33: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Trend TPAK• Data tren TPAK memperlihatkan perubahan
setting dan pemberdayaan perempuan.• TPAK perempuan meningkat tajam, tetapi
tetap lebih rendah dibanding TPAK laki laki‐• TPAK laki laki relatif stabil, tetapi tetap tinggi‐• Mengapa TPAK perempuan meningkat tajam?
(kini lebih banyak perempuan masuk pasar kerja, ini pemberdayaan perempuan atau kemiskinan?
![Page 34: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Pertanyaan perbedaan gender(data USA, 1950 1990)‐
• Mengapa TPAK perempuan selalu lebih rendah dari pada laki laki?‐
• Mengapa peningkatan TPAK Perempuan sangat tajam? Tetapi lebih rendah dari TPAK laki laki?‐
• TPAK laki laki stabil tetap tinggi‐• Mengapa tingkat pengangguran perempuan
selalu lebih tinggi dari laki laki?‐
![Page 35: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• Mengapa terjadi peningkatan TPAK perempuan kawin?
• Terutama TPAK perempuan kawin yang mempunyai anak balita meningkat tajam?
• Perempuan lebih banyak bekerja sebagai clerical work dan sektor jasa
• Laki laki lebih banyak bekerja di menjadi ‐manager dan professional
• Laki laki bekerja di pertambangan, konstruksi,‐ transport dan utilities (listrik, telpon dll).
![Page 36: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Keikutsertaan dalam Serikat Kerja
• Keikut sertaan perempuan pekerja dlm serikat pekerja lebih rendah dr laki laki dan stabil, tidak ‐berubah
• Kasus perempuan yg ditangani serikat pekerja juga rendah (peremp 15% laki 20%)
• Tetapi ada tendensi keanggotaan perempuan dlm SP meningkat dari 18% thn 1950 ke 38%tahun 1990 (jumlh perempuan/jumlh SP).
• Apakah kita punya data tentang ini?
![Page 37: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Gender Gap Penghasilan• Diukur dari rasio penghasilan pr thd lk• Ada tendensi rasio meningkat, artinya ada
peningkatan penghasilan perempuan– Peningkatan kualitas kerja pr vs lk?– Penurunan diskriminsasi thd perempuan di pasar
kerja– Shift struktur pekerjaan ke arah modern sector –
manufacture, finance, foreign trade– Convergence of occupational distribution of men
and women? (pekerjaan bisa dilakukan leh pr maupun lk.)
![Page 38: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Bagaimana Kesejahteraan Perempuan• Penghasilan Pr selalu lebihrendah dari LK• Akses PR terhadap sumber daya keuangan lebih
rendah dr LK, tdk punya kontrol, tdk menikmati manfaat, tdk mendapat hak, ketimpangan gender, tdk ada kesetaraan
• Lk dgn pendapatan tinggi cenderung menikah dgn Pr pendapatan lebih rendah. Msh berlaku?
• Dilihat dlm keluarga: gabungan pendapatan. Less variation of income at family level
![Page 39: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Household as an Economic Unit
![Page 40: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Kompisisi Rumah Tangga (livingarrangement)
• Difinisi rumah tangga (BPS)• Komposisi: jumlah dan siapa anggota RT– Keluarga batih (Ortu + anak)– Keuarga luas (Ortu+anak+orang lain)– Lain2: three generations under one roof
• Bagaimana pembagian kerjanya?• Siapa yang lebih berkuasa dlm pengambilan
keputusan ? Kepala RT, KRT bersama isteri?, Isteri saja?
![Page 41: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Keuntungan tinggal bersama vssendiri
1. Economies of production – belanja bersama, masak bersama dll (cost sharing)
2. Internalisasi dr externalisasi3. Meringankan biaya transaksi4. Meringankan variasi utilitas karena resource
pooling
![Page 42: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Power distribution in household
• Money (yg bawa uang ke rumah lebih powerful)
• Patriarchy (helping husband maintaining harmony)
• Children• Re negotiation of power within a household‐
(kalau suami isteri sama sama bekerja?)
![Page 43: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Money as source of power• Partner yg membawa penghasilan lebih besar
ke rumah, punya power utk ambil keputusan• Tentang hal hal penting: beli rumah, mobil, ‐
perlengkapan rumah, siapa yang tentukan suami?
• Isteri, pengambil keputusan seputar anak, dapur,mengunjungi keluarga
• Siapa menentukan isteri untuk ber KB? Dan jumlah anak yg diinginkan?
![Page 44: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Budaya patriarki dan pembagian kerja
• Idealnya pembagian kerja yg rasional adalah seimbang antara lk dan pr
• Tapi budaya patriarki cenderung mengunggulkan lk sebagai bread winner, ‐diskriminasi perempuan di pasar kerja, menurunkan potensi perempuan untuk memperoleh pendapatan,seumur hidup tergantung suami, akses, kontrol dan manfaat terbatas, tidak ada kesetaraan, gender gap.
![Page 45: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Double burden perempuan bekerja• Meskipun isteri masuk pasar kerja tetapi tetap
mengerjakan pekerjaan rumah tangga, mengasuh anak, masak, nyuci dll.
• Suami? Mana egalitarianisme?• Isteri bekerja : market and non market work• Isteri melepaskan hak leisure time• Leisure time = non market good?, maka isteri
mendapat share lebih kecil dlm HH total production
![Page 46: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
GENDER AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE
![Page 47: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• Gender system: socially constructed expectations for male and female behaviour that are found in the society– Division of labor and responsibility (granted
different rights and obligation)– Side effect: inequality power between sexes,
autonomy, and well being—disdavantage of females
![Page 48: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
• Demographic change: change over time in a population– Fertility– Mortality– Migration (not a focus in researches)
• What specific variabel must be altered to influence fertility and mortality
![Page 49: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Fertility
• Bongaarts proximate detrminant:– Age of women becoming sexually active– Prevalence, duration and intersity of
breastfeeding– Contraceptive use– Use of abortion
![Page 50: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Mortality
• Mosly and Chen: 5 major proximate determianat s of infant and child mortality:– Maternal factors (mothers age, number of
previous births, interval– Environmental contamination– Nutrient deficiency– Injury– Personal illness control
![Page 51: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
• Individual have important role in affectting fertility and mortality
• Difficulties in studying gender and demographic change: no means unique to this topic, mkin strong causal inerence about gender systems and demographic change, complexity of gender system, varying role that of gender system apear to play under different circumstances
![Page 52: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
What DO We Know
• Fertility: – female education and employement to fertility is
consistant and robust than employement fertility (positive, nol)
– The relationship is greater among educated women.
– Female empowerment, reduces fertility and increase contraceptive use
![Page 53: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
What Do We Know
• Chilhood Mortality– Maternal education: increase childhood survival
by women becoming more self confident, communicative relationship with spouse
– Women’s education:strongly related to chilhood survival: health care, hygiene
– Women’s employment: increase resources to improve childrens nutrition or health care
– Partriachal gender system: elevated deaths among female children.
![Page 54: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The Impact of Demographic Change on Gender Systems
• Historically, demographic change has also affected gender system change
• How?• Lower Fertility: women have more fee time-
enter LF, have higher education, have own income, more bargaining power
• The demographic regime: fertility below the replacement level and high life expectancy as precondition to gender change.
![Page 55: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The Impact of Demographic Change on Gender Systems
• Scarcity of women: increase their value in marriage market
• Timing of motherhood and marriage: strong effects on women’s subsequent achievements and well being. (autonomy and power within family)
• Achievement of a modern demographic regime may be one pre-condition for changes in women’s and men’s lives that eventually lead to a less stratified gender system
![Page 56: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
HOW MUCH DO MEN AND WOMEN WORK ?
![Page 57: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
How much Do Men and Women Work?
• By age group, marital status, presence of children (USA, 1948-1992)– Men:
• Participation decrease among youngger and older age• Postpone entering labor market: schooling• Retire at early ages
– Women:• LFP increase, greater among married women, tripling among
women with preschool children• Why ?
– Increase demand this increases their wage, draws them into LF
![Page 58: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Part time Workers as % of Total Employment by Sex, 1970, 1980 and
1992Women Men Total
1970 27,5 9,5 16,4
1980 26,8 9,6 16,9
1992 25,4 10,8 17,5
![Page 59: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Percentage Distribution of Family Income, Median, Mean Family Income by Sex, 1988
Men Women
< $ 5000 2,6 3,9
$ 5000 - 9999 6,5 9,2
$ 10.000- 19.999 16,9 19,2
$20.000 - 29.999 19,5 18,9
$30.000 - 39.999 17,3 16,1
$40.000 - 49.999 13,3 12,3
$50.000 - 74.999 15,3 13,0
$75.000 - 99.999 5,4 4,7
≥ $ 100.000 3,2 2,7
Median Income $32.039 $ 29.087
Mean Income $38.732 $ 35.542
![Page 60: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Allocation of Time: % Distribution of Weekly Time Devoted to Various Activities
by Sex, 1985
Women Men
Personal Care 44 44
Leisure 23 24
Paid Work 13 23
Housework 12 5
Shopping 4 3
Childcare 4 1
![Page 61: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Explanation of Women’s LFP
Demand side:• General rise in labor• Rise in education of womenSupply factors:• Rising wages for women• Changing technology of nonmarket production• Change in family composition• Falling male wages
![Page 62: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Explanation in the Fall of Men’s LFP
Demand side• Sectoral decline in labor demand in sectors
where men predominantly employed (manufacturing)
• Increase in substitution of female for male laborSupply side factors:• Rising real wages• Rises in nonearned income
![Page 63: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Women’s formal labor force participation lowest among all regions
![Page 64: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Characteristics of women in the labor market
Female Education and Labor Force Participation in MENA and EAP, 1970-2000Female Education and Labor Force Participation in MENA and EAP, 1970-2000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1970 1980 1990 2000
Female enrollment in secondary school, MENA
Female labor force particpation, MENA
Female enrollment in secondary school, EAP
Female labor force particpation, EAP
Percent
Note: In East Asia and the Pacific (EAP), secondary enrollment is for 1999 rather than 2000Source: ILO 1996; World Bank 2003d, 2003j
![Page 65: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Characteristics of women in the labor market
Female Unemployment Rates by Educational Level in MENA Countries, Various YearsFemale Unemployment Rates by Educational Level in MENA Countries, Various Years
![Page 66: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Female labor force participation and higher overall employment
Empirical evidence does not support the claim that women’s Empirical evidence does not support the claim that women’s increased labor force participation increases unemploymentincreased labor force participation increases unemployment
![Page 67: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
HOUSEHOLD AS AN ECONOMIC UNIT
![Page 68: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Percentage Distribution of Married Couple Families by Labor Force Status of Spouse, 1991
Percentage
Husband and Wife in LF 54,0
Husband in LF, Wife not in LF 24,3
Both not in LF 17,0
Wife in LF, Husband not in LF 4,7
![Page 69: The Economics of Gender](https://reader036.fdokumen.com/reader036/viewer/2022062315/56815966550346895dc6a332/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
How Power is Distributed inHousehold
• Money as Power• Patriarchy on household sharing• Women care more in children• Renegoriation of sharing rules