No. 036/S/PPB/19.07/2019

KONTRIBUSI MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP

KETERLIBATAN SISWA (STUDENT ENGAGEMENT) DALAM PROSES

PEMBELAJARAN DI SEKOLAH

(Studi terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 45 Bandung Tahun

Ajaran 2018/2019)

SKRIPSI

Diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk memperoleh gelar

Sarjana Pendidikan Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling

oleh

Triyantini

1506591

DEPARTEMEN PSIKOLOGI PENDIDIKAN DAN BIMBINGAN

FAKULTAS ILMU PENDIDIKAN

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

2019

KONTRIBUSI MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP

KETERLIBATAN SISWA (STUDENT ENGAGEMENT) DALAM PROSES

PEMBELAJARAN DI SEKOLAH

(Studi terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 45 Bandung Tahun

Ajaran 2018/2019)

Oleh

Triyantini

Sebuah skripsi yang diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar

Sarjana Pendidikan pada Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan

© Triyantini 2019

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Juli 2019

Hak Cipta dilindungi undang-undang.

Skripsi ini tidak boleh diperbanyak seluruhya atau sebagian,

dengan dicetak ulang, difoto kopi, atau cara lainnya tanpa ijin dari penulis.

i

ABSTRAK

Triyantini (2019). Kontribusi Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Keterlibatan Siswa

dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Sekolah (Studi terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas VIII di

SMP Negeri 45 Bandung Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019)

Keterlibatan (engagement) merupakan meta-konstruk yang terdiri dari aspek kognitif,

behavioral, dan emosi. Penelitian dilatarbelakangi oleh pengamatan terhadap pola belajar

siswa yang sangat beragam. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan hanya sebagian peserta didik

yang menunjukkan keinginan untuk meraih prestasi dan menjadi unggul. Penelitian

mendeskripsikan besaran kontribusi motivasi berprestasi terhadap keterlibatan siswa.

Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode korelasional.

Penelitian dilakukan pada peserta didik kelas VIII SMP Negeri 45 Bandung Tahun Ajaran

2018/2019 yang terdiri dari 7 kelas sebanyak 135 peserta didik dengan menggunakan

simple random sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan Intrumen Motif Berprestasi

(IMP) dan instrumen keterlibatan siswa yang diadaptasi dari Student Engagement

Instrument (SEI). Analisis data dilakukan dengan analisis regresi linear sederhana untuk

mengungkap kontribusi motivasi berprestasi terhadap keterlibatan siswa dalam proses

pembelajaran di sekolah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat kontribusi motivasi

berprestasi terhadap keterlibatan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran. Rekomendasi

penelitian bagi guru bimbingan dan konseling agar dapat merancang layanan bimbingan

yang bersifat preventif dan pengembangan untuk mengoptimalkan keterlibatan siswa

dalam proses pembelajaran.

Kata Kunci: Keterlibatan siswa, Keterlibatan Perilaku, Keterlibatan Kognitif,

Keterlibatan Emosi, Motivasi Berprestasi

ii

ABSTRACT

Triyantini (2019). Contribution of Achievement Motivation to Student Engagement in

The Learning Processes at School (A Study of student in SMP Negeri 45 Bandung,

Academic Year 2018/2019)

Abstract: Engagement is meta-construct which consists of cognitive, behavioral, and

emotional aspects. This research is motivated by observing on very diverse learning

patterns of students at school. The observation result evidenced that only some students

showed a desire to reach achievement and be excellent. The study describes the magnitude

contribution of achievement motivation to student engagement. It is conducted by using a

quantitative approach and correlational methods. The study was conducted on VIII grade

students in SMP Negeri 45 Bandung 2018/2019 academic year which consist of 7 class as

much as 135 students by using simple random sampling. The data collection uses

Achievement Motives Instrument (IMP) and student engagement instruments adapted from

Student Engagement Instrument (SEI). Data analysis is performed by simple linear

regression analysis to reveal the contribution of achievement motivation to student

engagement in the learning process at school. The results meaning there is a contribution

of achievement motivation towards student engagement in the learning process at school.

The research recommendation given to the counseling teachers is to design preventive

guidance services and development to optimize student engagement in the learning

process.

Keyword: Student Engagement, Behavioral Engagement, Cognitive Engagement,

Emotional Engagement, Achievement Motivation

vi

DAFTAR ISI

ABSTRAK .............................................................................................................. i

KATA PENGANTAR .......................................................................................... iii

UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH.................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

DAFTAR ISI ......................................................................................................... vi

DAFTAR TABEL..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

DAFTAR GRAFIK .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

BAB I PENDAHULUAN ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.1 Latar Belakang Penelitian........................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.2 Identifikasi dan Rumusan Masalah ......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.3 Tujuan Penelitian ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.4 Manfaat Penelitian ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

1.5 Struktur Penulisan ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

BAB II KONSEP MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI DAN KETERLIBATAN

SISWA ....................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.1 Konsep Motivasi Berprestasi ................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.2 Konsep Dasar Keterlibatan Siswa (Student Engagement)............... Error!

Bookmark not defined.

2.3 Karakteristik Remaja ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.4 Konsep Bimbingan dan Konseling .......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.5 Penelitian Terdahulu ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

BAB III METODE PENELITIAN ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.1 Desain Penelitian ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.2 Populasi dan Sampel................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3 Definisi Operasional Variabel ................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.4 Instrumen Penelitian ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.5 Uji Coba Alat Ukur ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

vii

3.6 Prosedur Penelitian .................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.7 Teknik Pengumpulan Data ...................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.8 Teknik Pengolahan Data.......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

BAB IV TEMUAN PENELITIAN DAN PEMBAHASANError! Bookmark not

defined.

4.1 Deskripsi Hasil Temuan Penelitian ......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.2 Pembahasan Hasil Penelitian ................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.3 Rancangan Program Bimbingan Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi

Berprestasi dan Keterlibatan Siswa................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.4 Keterbatasan Penelitian ........................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

BAB V SIMPULAN DAN REKOMENDASI ........ Error! Bookmark not defined.

5.1 Simpulan .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

5.2 Rekomendasi ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA .......................................................................................... 82

82

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Alderman, K. M. (2004). Motivation for Achievement : Possibilities For Teaching

and Learning Second Edition. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, Stuctures, and Student Motivation. Journal

of Education Psychology. 84(3), hlm. 261-271.

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S.L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement

with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct.

Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher

education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.

Atkinson, J. W. & Feather, N. (1966). A Theory of Achievement Motivation. New

york:Wiley and Sons.

Australian Council for Educational Research. 2010. Doing more for learning:

Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Australasian Student Engagement

Report. Camberwell: ACER.

Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student Engagement Techniques : A Handbook for College

Faculty. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Brunstein, J. C., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Achievement motivation. In Motivation

and Action, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_6.

Chaplin, J.P. 2005. Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Terjemahan Kartini Kartono.

Jakarta : Raja Grafindo.

Chen, J. J.-L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and

peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating

role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology

Monographs, 131, 77–127.

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., &

Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A.

Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed.).

Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Christenson, S. L., Wylie, C., & Reschly, A.L. (2012). Handbook of Research on

Student Engagement. Minneapolis: Springer Science+Business Media.

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness:

A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A.

Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota Symposium on

Child Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conner, T. (2011). Academic engagement ratings and instructional preferences: Comparing behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement among three

school-age student cohorts. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning,

4(13), 52-62.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning Conducting and

Evaluating Quantitative and QualitativeResearch (fourth edition). Boston

Pearson Education,inc.

Depdiknas. (2008). Penataan Pendidikan Profesional Konselor dan Layanan

Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam jalur Formal. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral

Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

83

Devito, M. (2016). Factors Influencing Student Engagement . Unpublished

Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield,

CT. Diakses dari http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/edl/11.

Dharmayana, W., dkk. (2012). Keterlibatan Siswa (Student Engagement) sebagai

Mediator Kompetensi Emosi dan Prestasi Akademik.

Djaali. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Eccles, I. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed In W.

Damon (Series Ed.) &N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.) Handbook of child

psychology {5ih ed., Vol. Ill, pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.

Elias, M.J., Wang, M.C., Weissberg, R .P., Zins, J.E., & Walberg, H.J. (2002). The

other side of the report card: Student success depends on more than test

scores. American School Boards Journal, 28–31.

Estell, D. B., & Perdue, N. H. (2013). Social Support and Behavioral and Affective

School Engagement: The Effects of Peer, Parents, and Teachers. Psychology

in the Schools, 50(4), hlm. 325-339.

Feist, G., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2017). Theories of Personality Edisi delapan

Jilid 1. Terjemahan R.A Hadwitia Dewi Pertiwi. Jakarta: PT Salemba

Humanika.

Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for

school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221.

Fredricks, J. A. (2015). Academic Engagement. International Encyclopedia of the

Social & Behavioral Sciences, 1(2), hlm. 31-36.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:

Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational

Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.

Galugu, N. S., & Baharuddin. (2017). Hubungan antara Dukungan Sosial, Motivasi

Berprestasi, dan Keterlibatan Siswa di Sekolah. Journal of Islamic

Education Management. 3(2), HLM. 53-64

Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A., & Wigfield, A. (1996). Growth of

literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-

oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306-323.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2000). Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru

Algensindo.

Handoko, T. H. (1992). Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas

Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Student Engagement in Higher Education:

Theoritical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations.

New York: Routledge.

Hyde, C. E. (2009). The relationship between teacher assessment practice, student

goal orientation, and student engagement in elementary mathematics.

Dissertation. Diunduh dari Proquest. 3355464.

Iskandar. (2016). Implementasi Teori Hirarki Kebutuhan Abraham Maslom

terhadap peningkatan kinerja pustakawan. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan,

Informasi, dan Kearsipan Khizanah Al- Hikmah, 4(1), hlm. 24-34.

Jahja, Yudrik. (2011). Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in

Higher Education, 38(5), hlm. 758-773.

84

Kemendikbud. (2016). Pedoman Bimbingan dan Konseling pada Pendidikan

Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Guru dan

Tenaga Kependidikan

Khaldun, R. (2013). Psikologi: Kemampuan Kognitif dan Sosial-Emosional pada

Anak Usia Remaja Akhir. Al-Tazkiah. 3 (1), hlm. 29-40.

Knowles, dkk. (2005). The Adult Learner. California : Elsevier Inc.

Kraft, M., & Dougherty, S. (2013). The effect of teacher-family communication on

student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal

of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 199-222.

Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the

National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), hlm. 10–17.

Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE.

Change 35(2): 24--32.

Kuh, G.D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student

engagement. Journal of College Student Development 50, 683–706.

Kuh, G.D, dkk. (2007). Piecing Together the Student success Puzzle: Research,

Proposition, and Rekommendation. ASHE Higher Education Report. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kumaat, J. (2017). Hubungan Kebiasaan Belajar dengan Motivasi Berprestasi

Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Motoling. Jurnal Forum Pendidikan. 13(2), hlm. 87-

92

Majid, A., & Arief, Z. A. (2015). Hubungan antara Motivasi Belajar dan Partisipasi

Siswa dengan Hasil Belajar pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika (Survey pada

Siswa Kelas VIII di MTs Attaqwa Cicurug Sukabumi). Jurnal Teknologi

Pendidikan. 4(2), hlm. 1-11

Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the

elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research

Journal, 37, 153–184. doi:10.2307/1163475.

Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and Motivation. Journal

off School PsychologyI, hlm. 351-373.

Morgan, C. T. & King, R. A. (1990). Introduction to psychology. Tokyo : Mcgraw

hill.

National Research Council. (2004). Engaging Schools. Washington DC, The

National Academies Press.

Newmann, F. (1991). Student Engagement in Academic Work: Exspanding the

Prespective on Secondari school effectiveness. Research and Practice, 57-

76.

Nurihsan, J. & Agustin, M. (2013). Dinamika perkembangan anak dan remaja:

Tinjauan psikologi, pendidikan, dan bimbingan. Bandung: PT Refika

Aditama.

Nurihsan, J. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Bandung: Mutiara

Osterman, K. E. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community.

Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367. doi:10.2307/1170786.

Pascarella, E. T. (2001). Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we

even close? Change, 33(3), hlm. 19–23.

Rebecca, A. (2004). Emotional competence as antecedent to performance: A

contingency framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology

Monographs, 130(2), 117–143.

85

Riza, F. M., & Masykur, M. A. (2015). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Berprestasi

dengan Kedisplinan pada Siswa kelas VIII Reguler MtsN Nganjuk. Jurnal

Empati, hlm. 146-152.

Rumini, S. dan Sundari, S. 2004. Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta: PT

Rineka Cipta.

Saarni, C. (2000). Emotional competence, A developmental perspective. In Bar-

On, R., Parker, J.D.A (Eds), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence:

Theory, Development, Assesment, and Application at Home, School, and in

The Workplace (pp.68-91). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Company.

Safrudin, H. (2014). Pengaruh Pelayanan Bimbingan Belajar terhadap Motivasi

Belajar Siswa. Portal garuda: 2(1)

Santrock, J. W. (2003). Adolescensce (Perkembangan Remaja). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2005). Theories of personality. (8th ed.). Belmont,

CA: Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

Shinta, L. A. (2014). Hubungan antara Keterlibatan Akademik dengan Prestasi

Belajar Siswa Kelas X di SMK Negeri 1 Kota Bengkulu. Skripsi:

Universitas Bengkulu. diakses dari

http://repository.unib.ac.id/8315/1/I%2CII%2CIII%2CII-14-len.FK.pdf

Siregar, N. (2017). Hubungan Motivasi Berprestasi dengan Prestasi Akademik Pada

Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Prima Indonesia. Jurnal

Diversita. 3(1), hlm. 40-47.

Skinner, & Pitzer. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping

and everyday resilience. In Christenson, Reschly & wylie. Handbook of

research on student engagement, 21-44.

Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in

school and whether I've got it: The role of perceived control in children's

engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,

82, 22-32.

Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects

of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal

of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. Doi : 10.1037/0022-

0663.85.4.571.

Suciati. (1994). Teori Motivasi dan penerapannya dalam proses belajar-mengajar

(ARCS-Model). Jakarta: Depdikbud-Dirjen Dikti, PPAI-PAU Universitas

Terbuka.

Sugiyanto. (2009). Kontribusi Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Prestasi Akademik

Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 10 Semarang. Jurnal Paradigma, 8(4), hlm.

19-34.

Suherman, U. (2015). Manajemen Bimbingan dan Konseling. Bandung: Rizqi

Press.

Suherman. (t.t). Bimbingan Belajar. Direktori File UPI

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2011). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung:

Remaja Rosdakarya

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015a). Aplikasi model rasch pada assessment

pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunika Publishing House.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015b). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian

ilmu-ilmu social. Cimahi: Trim Komunika Publishing House.

86

Sutherland, S. D. (2010). Student Engagement Literature Review. Heslington: The

Higher Education Academy.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education

Academy. Diakses dari

https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/studentengagementliteratu

rereview_1.pdf.

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A Frame for Interaction and Cognitive

Engagement in Connectivist Learningf Contexts. The International Review

of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 15(2), hlm 121-141.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Development of Achievement Motivation. San

Diego: Academic Press.

Williams, C. K., & Williams, C. C. (2010). Five Key Ingredients for improving

student motivation. The Journal of Education,. hlm 2-23.

Winingsih, E. (2016). Direct Behavioral Consultation (DBC) Untuk Mengurangi

Perilaku Off Task. Jurnal Pendidikan. 1(2), hlm. 124-132.

Wysocki, D. C. (2007). A Study of Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning.

Dissertation. Washington State University, Washington DC.

Yusuf, S. & Nurihsan, J. (2011). Teori Kepribadian. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya Offset.

Yusuf, S. (2017). Bimbingan dan Konseling Perkembangan : Suatu Pendekatan

Komprehensif. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Zins, J.E., Weissberg, R.P., Wang, M.C., & Walberg. H.J. (Eds.). (2004). Building

academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research

say? New York: Teachers College Press.